{
  "id": 43576,
  "name": "Metric",
  "type": {
    "id": 5,
    "name": "Cardtype",
    "type": "Cardtype",
    "url": "https://wikirate.org/Cardtype.json",
    "codename": "cardtype"
  },
  "url": "https://wikirate.org/Metric",
  "codename": "metric",
  "items": [
    {
      "id": 43733,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Worker Empowerment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Worker_Empowerment.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Worker Empowerment",
      "question": "Is there any indication of workers' empowerment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p> </p>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>Freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining are key ‘enabling rights’. This means that when these rights are respected, workers can use them to ensure that other labour standards, including a living wage, are upheld. A living wage must always be a negotiated figure. We see worker empowerment as central to this. Unfortunately, workers face many barriers to joining or forming a trade union and bargaining collectively. Many governments restrict, undermine, obstruct or even outlaw independent trade unions. Employers often express a hostile attitude toward trade unions and frequently use a range of tactics to prevent unions from emerging, including intimidation, discrimination, dismissal, blacklisting and even physical violence. Brands need to take proactive steps to help prevent these trends and ensure practical respect for freedom of association is upheld.</div>\r\n<div><br><strong>Practical steps we were looking for evidence of included:</strong></div>\r\n<div>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Clear communication of a policy to support freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining for all stakeholders</li>\r\n<li>Training on these rights for a significant proportion of workers and management</li>\r\n<li>Issuing the right to organise guarantee to workers and promoting the use of union access agreements with suppliers; adoption of a credible and well-used complaints mechanism</li>\r\n<li>Work to limit the use of short-term contracts, which are often a barrier to trade-union freedom.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The campaign defines Wages and benefits paid for a standard working week shall meet at least legal or industry minimum standards and always be sufficient to meet basic needs of workers and their families and to provide some discretionary income. (See p.98 of the [[http://wikirate.org/Page_000001541| report]])</p>\r\n<p>In this report, fifty of the most influential or strategic companies retailing in Europe were approached to take part in the study. These represent a mixture of fashion, sportswear, budget and supermarket retailers, as well as luxury fashion brands. Check whether the company you would like answers to this metric has participated in the Campaign’s search and add the score the campaign has determined in relation to worker empowerment?</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "10",
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Worker_Empowerment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 43742,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Living-wage Benchmarks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_wage_Benchmarks.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Living-wage Benchmarks",
      "question": "Does the company report on living-wage benchmarks?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Does the company commit to living-wage benchmarks?</strong></p>\r\n<p><br>Companies must commit to living-wage benchmarks for many reasons. By putting a figure on the living wage, the labour cost can be calculated and embedded into pricing breakdowns, and companies can use this to be sure that suppliers are receiving enough to pay a living wage. If enough companies do this, production-country governments are given a clear signal that putting up the minimum wage to a living-wage level will not risk loss of business. The commitment to a real living-wage benchmark from companies also opens up space in wage negotiations between workers and factory owners. Currently, these negotiations often achieve very little because factory owners say they cannot pay more, due to low prices paid by buyers. But if unions or worker groups know that brands being produced in their factory have committed to a specified living-wage figure, these negotiations are opened up and a living wage becomes a possibility. </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The campaign defines Wages and benefits paid for a standard working week shall meet at least legal or industry minimum standards and always be sufficient to meet basic needs of workers and their families and to provide some discretionary income. (See p.98 of the [[http://wikirate.org/Page_000001541| report]])</p>\r\n<p>In this report, fifty of the most influential or strategic companies retailing in Europe were approached to take part in the study. These represent a mixture of fashion, sportswear, budget and supermarket retailers, as well as luxury fashion brands. Check whether the company you would like answers to this metric has participated in the Campaign’s search and add the score the campaign has determined in relation to whether the company reports on living-wage benchmark?</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_wage_Benchmarks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 43750,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Commitment and Practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Commitment_and_Practices.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Commitment and Practices",
      "question": "How much does the company score in relation to commitment and practice?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p> The Clean Clothes Initiative believes that suppliers must be adequately compensated for the costs involved in meeting compliance demands. This requires that pricing practices do not prevent suppliers from being decent employers. Global buyers must be sure that the prices they pay will, at the very least, cover payment of a living wage. At the same time, global buyers should also express a willingness to establish long-term relations with their suppliers. Lead times and factory capacity must also be taken into account to ensure use of overtime does not become standard practice. Buyers can further take positive steps to drive change by giving incentives for suppliers displaying best practice.</p>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div><br><strong>Practical steps we were looking for evidence of included:</strong></div>\r\n<div>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Adoption of figures for living-wage benchmarks in main production countries and evidence of their use</li>\r\n<li>Buying systems that break down the free-on-board (FOB) price to include specified labour costs; open costing with suppliers</li>\r\n<li>Buying practices that show a preference for factories with high wage standards or factories that support the establishment and functioning of independent trade unions</li>\r\n<li>Work to consolidate supply chains.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The campaign defines Wages and benefits paid for a standard working week shall meet at least legal or industry minimum standards and always be sufficient to meet basic needs of workers and their families and to provide some discretionary income. (See p.98 of the [[http://wikirate.org/Page_000001541| report]])</p>\r\n<p>In this report, fifty of the most influential or strategic companies retailing in Europe were approached to take part in the study. These represent a mixture of fashion, sportswear, budget and supermarket retailers, as well as luxury fashion brands. Check whether the company you would like answers to this metric has participated in the Campaign’s search and add the score the campaign has determined in relation to commitment &amp; practice?</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/10",
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Commitment_and_Practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 43759,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Collaborative Approach",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Collaborative_Approach.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Collaborative Approach",
      "question": "How much does the company score if it implements a collaborative approach policy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The solution to the problem of low wages will involve a number of key players in supply chains being willing to work together, namely brands, suppliers, unions (local, national and global), employer federations and governments. This will require trust and partnership between all parties being built over time. A willingness to be transparent also plays a key role. It is vital that brands play their part in initiating partnerships with corporate and labour stakeholders. Vitally important in all of this is the engagement of workers and their organisations in the design and implementation of any projects to increase wages. So often these partners are overlooked or only briefly consulted.</p>\r\n<p><br><strong>Practical steps we were looking for evidence of included:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Partnership projects with local and international independent trade unions</li>\r\n<li>Central worker involvement in all projects</li>\r\n<li>Collaborations with other brands</li>\r\n<li>Membership of credible MSIs</li>\r\n<li>Work to publicly support national demands for minimum-wage increases to production-country governments</li>\r\n<li>Disclosure of supplier lists and a commitment to transparent working</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The campaign defines Wages and benefits paid for a standard working week shall meet at least legal or industry minimum standards and always be sufficient to meet basic needs of workers and their families and to provide some discretionary income. (See p.98 of the [[http://wikirate.org/Page_000001541| report]])</p>\r\n<p>In this report, fifty of the most influential or strategic companies retailing in Europe were approached to take part in the study. These represent a mixture of fashion, sportswear, budget and supermarket retailers, as well as luxury fashion brands. Check whether the company you would like answers to this metric has participated in the Campaign’s search and add the score the campaign has determined in relation to collaborative approach?</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/10",
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Collaborative_Approach+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 43768,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Strategy.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Strategy",
      "question": "How much does the company score if it implements a robust living-wage strategy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p> </p>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>The lack of a comprehensive approach regarding the implementation of a living wage remains an obstacle to progress. Some companies have already adopted a living-wage standard within their codes of conduct, but unfortunately very few global buyers have come up with comprehensive plan for its implementation. If any progress is to be made, it is vital that companies get behind transparent and credible strategies to follow through on their living-wage commitments. A clearly articulated goal allows clear communication between all players in the supply chain about what change will happen, how and when.</div>\r\n<div><br><strong>Practical steps we were looking for evidence of included:</strong></div>\r\n<div>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Public commitment to delivering a living wage within a specified time frame and a detailed strategy for doing so</li>\r\n<li>Consultation and negotiation with trade unions and worker groups on this strategy</li>\r\n<li>Inclusion of vulnerable workers</li>\r\n<li>Pilot projects demonstrating real wage increases that are up-scalable and create models that can be replicated in other factories</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The campaign defines Wages and benefits paid for a standard working week shall meet at least legal or industry minimum standards and always be sufficient to meet basic needs of workers and their families and to provide some discretionary income. (See p.98 of the [[http://wikirate.org/Page_000001541| report]])</p>\r\n<p>In this report, fifty of the most influential or strategic companies retailing in Europe were approached to take part in the study. These represent a mixture of fashion, sportswear, budget and supermarket retailers, as well as luxury fashion brands. Check whether the company you would like answers to this metric has participated in the Campaign’s search and add the score the campaign has determined in relation to living-wage strategy?</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 43777,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Elimination of APEOs and Phthalates",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Elimination_of_APEOs_and_Phthalates.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Elimination of APEOs and Phthalates",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy regarding elimination of APEOs and Phthalates?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Within the 11 PHC groups, two hazardous chemical groups, widely and deliberately used in textile manufacturing are targeted for elimination far before the final 01 January 2020 deadline. The Detox Catwalk evaluates the elimination status of these two initial priority hazardous chemical groups across the companies’ respective supply chains.</p>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>The elimination of any hazardous chemical must be supported by regular, credible, public documentation via a corporate website, and include case studies on the substitution of hazardous chemicals with safer alternatives, published, for example, via the online Subsport.org platform.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>As a Detox commitment is a continuous process, companies need clear and credible intermediate targets on the elimination of hazardous chemicals (beyond the 11 priority chemical groups) and the introduction of non-hazardous chemistry by the earliest specific date possible. Responsible companies will act now and not wait until 31 December 2019 to eliminate their hazardous chemical use.</p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Elimination of APEOs and Phthalates</strong> – Within the 11 Priority Hazardous Chemical groups Greenpeace has identified for elimination, two are widely and deliberately used in textile manufacturing. These are targeted for elimination far before the final 01 January 2020 deadline.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 18,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Elimination_of_APEOs_and_Phthalates+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 43784,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Elimination of PFCs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Elimination_of_PFCs.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Elimination of PFCs",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy to elimate PFCs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>PFCs are a group of chemicals that are known for their water and oil repellent properties and have been identified as persistent, bio-accumulative and toxic.  The process of eliminating PFCs involves the identification of suitable substitutes for some or all of the functions and attributes of PFC.</p>\r\n<div>\r\n<p>A credible programme of elimination needs to include the whole group of PFCs as well as the entire product range of the company concerned, leading to the elimination of this group of chemicals. Unfortunately, the Greenwashers Nike and Li-Ning do not commit to the elimination of all PFCs with a clear deadline, in all their products and allow the substitution of PFCs that are now subject to regulations, with other PFCs that are not yet regulated, but may be equally hazardous.</p>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": "<p>Responsible Detox brands have committed to phase out (and some have already eliminated from their global supply-chains) any use and discharge of the hazardous chemical group perfluorinated chemicals (PFCs).</p>\r\n<p>PFCs are a group of chemicals that are known for their water and oil repellent properties and have been identified as persistent, bio-accumulative and toxic. The process of eliminating PFCs involves the identification of suitable substitutes for some or all of the functions and attributes of PFCs. Some Detox Leaders have already eliminated the use of PFCs in their products through an elimination programme that includes progressively substituting them with safer alternatives.</p>\r\n<p>A credible programme of elimination needs to include the whole group of PFCs as well as the entire product range of the company concerned, leading to the elimination of this group of chemicals. Unfortunately, the Detox Greenwashers do not commit to the elimination of all PFCs with a clear deadline, in all their products and allow the substitution of PFCs that are now subject to regulations, with other PFCs that are not yet regulated, but may be equally hazardous.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 18,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Elimination_of_PFCs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 43792,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Detox Transparency",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Detox_Transparency.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Detox Transparency",
      "question": "Does the company disclose their chemical data on the IPE platform? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>A credible, individual Detox plan is not possible without transparency on the use and discharge of all hazardous chemicals. Once the reality of hazardous chemical pollution is revealed to the public, the obligation is on those responsible to act rapidly and effectively to achieve zero use of hazardous chemicals. It is crucial that local communities, the general public and public interest organisations can regularly and easily access up to date and detailed information, for example via the IPE (Chinese Institute for Public and Environmental Affairs 13) global online platform. The IPE disclosure platform provides an existing, well-known, publicly accessible and independent online database where a company’s suppliers can disclose chemical discharge data.</p>\r\n<div>\r\n<p>For this version of the Detox Catwalk, brands have been asked to report on the number and percentage of global wet processing suppliers that have disclosed discharge data for the initial 11 priority hazardous chemical groups on the IPE platform (i.e. the percentage of units produced relative to total global \"wet processing\" production and the percentage per country). This information must also be published on the company’s website.</p>\r\n<p>By publishing chemical discharge data via the IPE disclosure platform, a company’s suppliers ensure that the data is credible, that it includes the necessary details to identify the individual facility concerned and that it covers at least the 11 groups of priority hazardous chemicals. Because much of the world’s textiles production takes place in China, companies must ensure data from suppliers in China is disclosed, followed by other major suppliers in the Global South.</p>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Transparency</strong><span> – The public’s right to know which hazardous chemicals are being used and discharged into the environment and where precisely this is happening.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 18,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Detox_Transparency+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 43801,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Seafood Sustainability Initiatives",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Seafood_Sustainability_Initiatives.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Seafood Sustainability Initiatives",
      "question": "How much does the company score in Greenpeace's Seafood Sustainability Initiatives?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Participation in conservation initiatives such as sustainable fishing or protection of marine habitat, like Bering Sea Canyons.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The Greenpeace 2014 Rankings of Seafood Sustainability in U.S. Supermarkets [[http://wikirate.org/Page_000001538| report]] contain information of how well the company scores in its seafood sustainability initiatives. For the 2015 data researchers are encourage to check this [[http://cato.greenpeaceusa.org/Carting-Away-the-Oceans-9.pdf| report]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Seafood_Sustainability_Initiatives+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 43805,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Sustainable Seafood Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Sustainable_Seafood_Policy.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Sustainable Seafood Policy",
      "question": "How much does the company score it Greenpeace's Sustainable Seafood Policy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The systems in place that govern the company's purchasing decisions and how it avoids supporting destructive practices.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The Greenpeace 2014 Rankings of Seafood Sustainability in U.S. Supermarkets [[http://wikirate.org/Page_000001538| report]] contain information of how well the company scores in its seafood sustainability initiatives. For the 2015 data researchers are encourage to check this [[http://cato.greenpeaceusa.org/Carting-Away-the-Oceans-9.pdf| report]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Sustainable_Seafood_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 43809,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Red List Seafood Sales",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Red_List_Seafood_Sales.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Red List Seafood Sales",
      "question": "What's the compnay's score if it sells any destructively caught or endangered marine species on Greenpeace's Red List for seafood?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Whether the retailer sells any destructively caught or endangered marine species on Greenpeace's Red List for seafood.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The Greenpeace 2014 Rankings of Seafood Sustainability in U.S. Supermarkets [[http://wikirate.org/Page_000001538| report]] contain information of how well the company scores in its seafood sustainability initiatives. For the 2015 data researchers are encourage to check this [[http://cato.greenpeaceusa.org/Carting-Away-the-Oceans-9.pdf| report]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/100",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Red_List_Seafood_Sales+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 43813,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Seafood Labeling and Transparency",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Seafood_Labeling_and_Transparency.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Seafood Labeling and Transparency",
      "question": "What is the company's score of transparency about where and who it sources its seafood from, and how clearly this is communicated to customers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company's level of transparency about where and who it sources its seafood from, and how clearly this is communicated to customers.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The Greenpeace 2014 Rankings of Seafood Sustainability in U.S. Supermarkets [[http://wikirate.org/Page_000001538| report]] contain information of how well the company scores in its seafood sustainability initiatives. For the 2015 data researchers are encourage to check this [[http://cato.greenpeaceusa.org/Carting-Away-the-Oceans-9.pdf| report]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/100",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Seafood_Labeling_and_Transparency+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 43844,
      "name": "Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO)+CSR business initiative",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Centre_for_Research_on_Multinational_Corporations_SOMO+CSR_business_initiative.json",
      "designer": "Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO)",
      "title": "CSR business initiative",
      "question": "Has the company adopted any CSR business initatives?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Has the company adopted any CSR business initatives?</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>From the attached source, scroll to the appendix table and check whether the company has adopted any CSR business initiative. If it does, write which inititative in the discussion box.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Philanthropy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Centre_for_Research_on_Multinational_Corporations_SOMO+CSR_business_initiative+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 43906,
      "name": "Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO)+Green procurement policies",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Centre_for_Research_on_Multinational_Corporations_SOMO+Green_procurement_policies.json",
      "designer": "Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO)",
      "title": "Green procurement policies",
      "question": "Does the company have green procurement policies?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The CSR policies of seven digital camera companies (Olympus, Sanyo Electric Co., Samsung, Pentax, Nikon, Fujifilm and Canon) include extensive environmental policies and good quality corporate governance polices. Every company has the environmental management standard ISO14001 certifications for its operations and Green Procurement policies.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>From the attached source, scroll to the appendix table and check whether the company has adopted Green Procurement policies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Centre_for_Research_on_Multinational_Corporations_SOMO+Green_procurement_policies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 43912,
      "name": "Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO)+Freedom of association and collective bargaining",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Centre_for_Research_on_Multinational_Corporations_SOMO+Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining.json",
      "designer": "Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO)",
      "title": "Freedom of association and collective bargaining",
      "question": "Is freedom of association and collective bargaining mentioned in their code of conduct and does it approach the level of the ILO standards 87/98?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Is freedom of association and collective bargaining mentioned in their code of conduct and does it approach the level of the ILO standards 87/98?</p>\r\n<p><br><strong>Definition of Freedom of Association</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>That workers can associate, and demand respect of their rights and the defence of their interests, without fear of having actions taken against them by the companies.</li>\r\n<li>It also means that their collective actions won‟t be blocked by the government, companies or other unions that don‟t represent them.</li>\r\n<li>Freedom of association also means that workers can decide if they join (or not) specific groups or unions, and that their choice won‟t be a reason for sacking them or a requirement for being hired.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Source: Presentation Cereal at stakeholder meeting of the EICC, Mexico, 2010.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>From the attached source, scroll to the appendix table and check whether the company has adopted, promotes or allows Freedom of Association. If the company does mention its support, add how in the discussion box.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Centre_for_Research_on_Multinational_Corporations_SOMO+Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 44054,
      "name": "Roberts Environmental Center+Bribery",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Roberts_Environmental_Center+Bribery.json",
      "designer": "Roberts Environmental Center",
      "title": "Bribery",
      "question": "How much does the company score in implementing its policy to reject bribery?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Does the company report on the rejection of bribery?</strong></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Adoption of Policy</strong><br>1 point is assigned for adoption of a policy standard or for an explicit discussion of an organization’s stance on each of 11 human rights principles <br><br></li>\r\n<li><strong>Action to Reinforce Policy<br></strong>1 point for a description of reinforcement actions to make a policy stronger, such as providing educational programs, training, or other activities to promote awareness<br><br></li>\r\n<li><strong>Monitoring<br></strong>1 point for a description of monitoring measures including mechanisms to detect violations at an early stage, providing systematic reporting, or establishment of committee structure to oversee risky activities.<strong> <br><br></strong></li>\r\n<li><strong>Quantiative Indication of Compliance<br></strong>1 point for a quantitative indication of compliance, such as a description of incidences of failure of compliance, or a statement that there were no such incidences. <br><span></span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": "<p>The team downloads revelant English languages web pages from the main corporate website for the first month of analysis and convert them into a PDF format, then a survey of topics for inclusion in the questionnaire is underway. Data exclusively and independently available outside the main corporate website are omitted to keep transparancy score only to include innate information provided by the company. Although we aim to be objective in our analysis, our analysts are encouraged to expressed their subjective view of what they see in the report, allowing creativity to permeate in the individual analyzes of companies and the industry-wide reporting of topics.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Roberts_Environmental_Center+Bribery+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 44061,
      "name": "Roberts Environmental Center+Anti-corruption Practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Roberts_Environmental_Center+Anti_corruption_Practices.json",
      "designer": "Roberts Environmental Center",
      "title": "Anti-corruption Practices",
      "question": "What does LAQI do to fight corruption?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>What are the company's efforts to uphold the highest standards of business ethics and integrity?</strong></p>\r\n<p>May be found under a Code of Conduct.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Adoption of Policy</strong><br>1 point is assigned for adoption of a policy standard or for an explicit discussion of an organization’s stance on each of 11 human rights principles <br><br></li>\r\n<li><strong>Action to Reinforce Policy<br></strong>1 point for a description of reinforcement actions to make a policy stronger, such as providing educational programs, training, or other activities to promote awareness<br><br></li>\r\n<li><strong>Monitoring<br></strong>1 point for a description of monitoring measures including mechanisms to detect violations at an early stage, providing systematic reporting, or establishment of committee structure to oversee risky activities.<strong> <br><br></strong></li>\r\n<li><strong>Quantiative Indication of Compliance<br></strong>1 point for a quantitative indication of compliance, such as a description of incidences of failure of compliance, or a statement that there were no such incidences.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p>The team downloads revelant English languages web pages from the main corporate website for the first month of analysis and convert them into a PDF format, then a survey of topics for inclusion in the questionnaire is underway. Data exclusively and independently available outside the main corporate website are omitted to keep transparancy score only to include innate information provided by the company. Although we aim to be objective in our analysis, our analysts are encouraged to expressed their subjective view of what they see in the report, allowing creativity to permeate in the individual analyzes of companies and the industry-wide reporting of topics.</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Roberts_Environmental_Center+Anti_corruption_Practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 44069,
      "name": "Roberts Environmental Center+Political Contributions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Roberts_Environmental_Center+Political_Contributions.json",
      "designer": "Roberts Environmental Center",
      "title": "Political Contributions",
      "question": "How much does the company score regarding policies about political contributions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>What are the company's policies about political contributions?</strong></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Adoption of Policy</strong><br>1 point is assigned for adoption of a policy standard or for an explicit discussion of an organization’s stance on each of 11 human rights principles <br><br></li>\r\n<li><strong>Action to Reinforce Policy<br></strong>1 point for a description of reinforcement actions to make a policy stronger, such as providing educational programs, training, or other activities to promote awareness<br><br></li>\r\n<li><strong>Monitoring<br></strong>1 point for a description of monitoring measures including mechanisms to detect violations at an early stage, providing systematic reporting, or establishment of committee structure to oversee risky activities.<strong> <br><br></strong></li>\r\n<li><strong>Quantiative Indication of Compliance<br></strong>1 point for a quantitative indication of compliance, such as a description of incidences of failure of compliance, or a statement that there were no such incidences.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p>The team downloads revelant English languages web pages from the main corporate website for the first month of analysis and convert them into a PDF format, then a survey of topics for inclusion in the questionnaire is underway. Data exclusively and independently available outside the main corporate website are omitted to keep transparancy score only to include innate information provided by the company. Although we aim to be objective in our analysis, our analysts are encouraged to expressed their subjective view of what they see in the report, allowing creativity to permeate in the individual analyzes of companies and the industry-wide reporting of topics.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Roberts_Environmental_Center+Political_Contributions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 44077,
      "name": "Roberts Environmental Center+Elimination of Discrimination",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Roberts_Environmental_Center+Elimination_of_Discrimination.json",
      "designer": "Roberts Environmental Center",
      "title": "Elimination of Discrimination",
      "question": "Does the company commit to not engaging in any kind of discrimination based on ethnicity, religion, disability, sex, age, sexual orientation, union membership, or political affiliation in hiring practices or employee treatment? (score)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Does the company commit to not engaging in any kind of discrimination based on ethnicity, caste, religion, disability, sex, age, sexual orientation, union membership, or political affiliation in hiring practices or employee treatment?</strong></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Adoption of Policy</strong><br>1 point is assigned for adoption of a policy standard or for an explicit discussion of an organization’s stance on each of 11 human rights principles <br><br></li>\r\n<li><strong>Action to Reinforce Policy<br></strong>1 point for a description of reinforcement actions to make a policy stronger, such as providing educational programs, training, or other activities to promote awareness<br><br></li>\r\n<li><strong>Monitoring<br></strong>1 point for a description of monitoring measures including mechanisms to detect violations at an early stage, providing systematic reporting, or establishment of committee structure to oversee risky activities.<strong> <br><br></strong></li>\r\n<li><strong>Quantiative Indication of Compliance<br></strong>1 point for a quantitative indication of compliance, such as a description of incidences of failure of compliance, or a statement that there were no such incidences.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p>The team downloads revelant English languages web pages from the main corporate website for the first month of analysis and convert them into a PDF format, then a survey of topics for inclusion in the questionnaire is underway. Data exclusively and independently available outside the main corporate website are omitted to keep transparancy score only to include innate information provided by the company. Although we aim to be objective in our analysis, our analysts are encouraged to expressed their subjective view of what they see in the report, allowing creativity to permeate in the individual analyzes of companies and the industry-wide reporting of topics.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/100",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Roberts_Environmental_Center+Elimination_of_Discrimination+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 44085,
      "name": "Roberts Environmental Center+Degrading Treatment or Punishment of Employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Roberts_Environmental_Center+Degrading_Treatment_or_Punishment_of_Employees.json",
      "designer": "Roberts Environmental Center",
      "title": "Degrading Treatment or Punishment of Employees",
      "question": "How much does the company score against any corporal/hard labor punishment, mental/physical coercion, or verbal abuse?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Does the company commit to opposing any corporal/hard labor punishment,mental/physical coercion, or verbal abuse?</strong></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Adoption of Policy</strong><br>1 point is assigned for adoption of a policy standard or for an explicit discussion of an organization’s stance on each of 11 human rights principles <br><br></li>\r\n<li><strong>Action to Reinforce Policy<br></strong>1 point for a description of reinforcement actions to make a policy stronger, such as providing educational programs, training, or other activities to promote awareness<br><br></li>\r\n<li><strong>Monitoring<br></strong>1 point for a description of monitoring measures including mechanisms to detect violations at an early stage, providing systematic reporting, or establishment of committee structure to oversee risky activities.<strong> <br><br></strong></li>\r\n<li><strong>Quantiative Indication of Compliance<br></strong>1 point for a quantitative indication of compliance, such as a description of incidences of failure of compliance, or a statement that there were no such incidences.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p>The team downloads revelant English languages web pages from the main corporate website for the first month of analysis and convert them into a PDF format, then a survey of topics for inclusion in the questionnaire is underway. Data exclusively and independently available outside the main corporate website are omitted to keep transparancy score only to include innate information provided by the company. Although we aim to be objective in our analysis, our analysts are encouraged to expressed their subjective view of what they see in the report, allowing creativity to permeate in the individual analyzes of companies and the industry-wide reporting of topics.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/100",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Roberts_Environmental_Center+Degrading_Treatment_or_Punishment_of_Employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46004,
      "name": "Sebastian Jekutsch+CSR Report Available",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sebastian_Jekutsch+CSR_Report_Available.json",
      "designer": "Sebastian Jekutsch",
      "title": "CSR Report Available",
      "question": "Is a recent Corporate Sustainability Report available?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Yes</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>First port of call should be to go to a company's website and look for a corporate social responsibility (CSR) or corporate responsibility (CR) report. If there is a report available then <strong>value = yes</strong>; if no report can be found then <strong>value = no</strong>.</p><p>Where no report can be found, it may not be that a report does not exist. Also please try other methods to explore if there is a CSR report, including contacting the company directly where required.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 136,
      "bookmarkers": 12,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 72,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sebastian_Jekutsch+CSR_Report_Available+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46633,
      "name": "PETA+Vegan Company",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/PETA+Vegan_Company.json",
      "designer": "PETA",
      "title": "Vegan Company",
      "question": "Does the company sell Vegan products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is the largest animal rights organization in the world, with more than 5 million members and supporters. It has a database of companies that test / do not use animal testing.</p>\r\n<p>Peta tools can be found on this [[http://features.peta.org//cruelty-free-company-search/index.aspx| page]]</p>\r\n<p>Peta classifies vegan products as containing no animal-derived ingredients and have not been tested on animals.</p>",
      "methodology": "PETA certifies companies as Vegan when they meet certain criteria.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "true",
        "false"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1703,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 1699,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/PETA+Vegan_Company+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46639,
      "name": "PETA+Animal Testing",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/PETA+Animal_Testing.json",
      "designer": "PETA",
      "title": "Animal Testing",
      "question": "Does the company test its products on animals?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is the largest animal rights organization in the world, with more than 5 million members and supporters. It has a database of companies that test / do not use animal testing.</p>\r\n<p>Peta tools can be found on this [[http://features.peta.org//cruelty-free-company-search/index.aspx| page]]</p>",
      "methodology": "http://www.peta.org/about-peta/how-is-a-company-certified-as-cruelty-free/",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1699,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1699,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/PETA+Animal_Testing+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46665,
      "name": "Ethisphere+Most Ethical Companies",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Ethisphere+Most_Ethical_Companies.json",
      "designer": "Ethisphere",
      "title": "Most Ethical Companies",
      "question": "Is the company listed by Ethisphere as one of the \"World's most ethical companies\"?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Each year the Ethisphere Institute publishes a list of the companies which it believes have put the most effort into improving their ethical impact of their business.",
      "methodology": "http://ethisphere.com/worlds-most-ethical/scoring-methodology/",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "true"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 996,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 279,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Ethisphere+Most_Ethical_Companies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46672,
      "name": "Newsweek+Sustainability Pay Link",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Newsweek+Sustainability_Pay_Link.json",
      "designer": "Newsweek",
      "title": "Sustainability Pay Link",
      "question": "Is the renumeration of senior executives linked to environmental performance targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets. ",
      "methodology": "http://www.newsweek.com/2014-newsweek-green-rankings-243744",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 476,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 475,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Newsweek+Sustainability_Pay_Link+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46679,
      "name": "Newsweek+Sustainability Board Committee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Newsweek+Sustainability_Board_Committee.json",
      "designer": "Newsweek",
      "title": "Sustainability Board Committee",
      "question": "Does the company have a committee, at Board of Directors level, whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters. ",
      "methodology": "http://www.newsweek.com/2014-newsweek-green-rankings-243744",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 476,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 475,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Newsweek+Sustainability_Board_Committee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46686,
      "name": "Newsweek+Environmental figures audited",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Newsweek+Environmental_figures_audited.json",
      "designer": "Newsweek",
      "title": "Environmental figures audited",
      "question": "Does the company provide evidence that the environmental figures it publishes are audited by a third party?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The company provides evidence that the latest reported environmental metrics are audited by a third party.",
      "methodology": "http://www.newsweek.com/2014-newsweek-green-rankings-243744",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 476,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 475,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Newsweek+Environmental_figures_audited+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46693,
      "name": "Newsweek+Newsweek Green Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Newsweek+Newsweek_Green_Score.json",
      "designer": "Newsweek",
      "title": "Newsweek Green Score",
      "question": "Overall green score awarded by Newsweek",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This score is produced by Newsweek as a weighted average of scores for their 8 Key performance Indicators (e.g. Energy Productivity Score, Reputation Score, Sustainability Pay Link, etc.). Yes/No metrics like Sustainability Pay Gap are given scores of 100/0%</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>Companies are scored based on their performance on eight specific indicators. The indicators are described below. A more detailed description of the methodology can be found <a href=\"http://s.newsweek.com/sites/www.newsweek.com/files/newsweek-green-rankings-final-methodology_2015.pdf\">online here</a>.</span></p>\r\n<p><em><strong>Indicator 1: Combined Energy Productivity</strong></em></p>\r\n<p><span><em><strong>Weight:</strong> </em>15%<br><em><strong>Methodology: </strong></em></span>In the first step, each company's Energy Productivity is calculated for 2013 (which is the most recently reported period), with Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ). Each company’s Energy Productivity is then percent-ranked against that of all Industry Group peers in the CKC research universe and multiplied by 0.75. The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) definition of “Industry Group” will be used.</p>\r\n<p><span>In the second step, the change in each company’s Energy Productivity from 2011-2013 is calculated and percent-ranked against that of all same-Industry Group peers within the CKC research universe. If the company’s percent-ranked 2013 Energy Productivity is top quartile, their percent-ranked change in Energy Productivity for 2011-2013 is multiplied by 1 and then by 0.25. If the company’s percent-ranked 2013 Energy Productivity is second quartile, their percent-ranked change in Energy Productivity for 2011-2013 is multiplied by 0.75 and then by </span>0.25. If the company’s percent-ranked 2013 Energy Productivity is third quartile, their percent-ranked change in Energy Productivity for 2011-2013 is multiplied by 0.5 and then by 0.25. If the company’s percent-ranked 2013 Energy Productivity is bottom quartile, their percent-ranked change in Energy Productivity for 2011-2013 is multiplied by 0.25 and then by 0.25.</p>\r\n<p><span>In the third step, the values from the first and second steps are totaled.</span></p>\r\n<p><em><strong>Indicator 2: <span>Combined Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Productivity</span></strong></em><br><em><strong>Weight: </strong></em>15%<br><strong><em>Methodology</em>: </strong>In the first step, each company's GHG Productivity is calculated for 2013, with GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e). Only Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions are included according to the GHG Protocol. Each company’s GHG Productivity is then percent-ranked against that of all Industry Group peers in the CKC research universe and multiplied by 0.75.</p>\r\n<p><span>In the second step, the change in each company’s GHG Productivity from 2011-2013 is calculated and percent-ranked against that of all same-industry group peers within the CKC research universe. If the company’s percent-ranked 2013 GHG Productivity is top quartile, their percent-ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2011-2013 is multiplied by 1 and then by 0.25. If the company’s percent-ranked 2013 GHG Productivity is </span>second quartile, their percent-ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2011-2013 is multiplied by 0.75 and then by 0.25. If the company’s percent-ranked 2013 GHG Productivity is third quartile, their percent-ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2011-2013 is multiplied by 0.5 and then by 0.25. If the company’s percent-ranked 2013 GHG Productivity is bottom quartile, their percent-ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2011-2013 is multiplied by 0.25 and then by 0.25.</p>\r\n<p>In the third step, the values from the first and second steps are totaled and then multiplied by 0.9.</p>\r\n<p>In the fourth step, if the company disclosed Scope 3 GHG emissions in 2013, a score of 100 percent is attributed and then multiplied by 0.1. Otherwise, a score of 0 percent is given.</p>\r\n<p><span>In the final step, the scores from the third and fourth steps are added.</span></p>\r\n<p><em><strong>Indicator 3: <span>Combined Water Productivity</span></strong></em><br><em><strong>Weight:</strong></em> 15%<br><em><strong>Methodology: </strong></em>In the first step, each company's Water Productivity is calculated for 2013. Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3). Each company’s Water Productivity is then percent-ranked against that of all Industry Group peers in the CKC research universe and multiplied by 0.75.</p>\r\n<p><span>In the second step, the change in each company’s Water Productivity from 2011-2013 i</span>s calculated and percent-ranked against that of all same-industry group peers within the CKC research universe. If the company’s percent-ranked 2013 Water Productivity is top quartile, their percent-ranked change in Water Productivity for 2011-2013 is multiplied by 1 and then by 0.25. If the company’ percent-ranked 2013 Water Productivity is second quartile, their percent-ranked change in Water Productivity for 2011-2013 is multiplied by 0.75 and then by 0.25. If the company’s percent-ranked 2013 Water Productivity is third quartile, their percent-ranked change in Water Productivity for 2011-2013 is multiplied by 0.5 and then by 0.25. If the company’s percent-ranked 2013 Water Productivity is bottom quartile, their percent-ranked change in Water Productivity for 2011- 2013 is multiplied by 0.25 and then by 0.25.</p>\r\n<p><span>the third step, the values from the first and second steps are totaled.</span></p>\r\n<p><em><strong>Indicator 4: <span>Combined Waste Productivity</span></strong></em><br><em><strong>Weight:</strong></em> 15%<br><em><strong>Methodology: </strong></em>In the first step, each company's Waste Productivity is calculated for 2013. Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) – waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)]. Each company’s Waste Productivity is then percent-ranked against that of all Industry Group peers in the CKC research universe and multiplied by 0.75.</p>\r\n<p><span>In the second step, the change in each company’s Waste Productivity from 2011-2013 is calculated and percent-ranked against that of all same-industry group peers within the CKC research universe. If the company’s percent-ranked 2013 Waste Productivity is top quartile, their percent-ranked change in Waste Productivity for 2011-2013 is multiplied by 1 and then by 0.25. If the company’s percent-ranked 2013 Waste Productivity is second quartile, their percent-ranked change in Waste Productivity for 2011-2013 is multiplied by 0.75 and then by 0.25. If the company’s percent-ranked 2013 Waste Productivity is third quartile, their percent-ranked change in Waste Productivity for 2011-2013 is multiplied by 0.5 and then by 0.25. If the company’s percent-ranked 2013 Waste Productivity is bottom quartile, their percent-ranked change in Waste Productivity for 2011- 2013 is multiplied by 0.25 and then by 0.25.</span></p>\r\n<p>In the third step, the values from the first and second steps are totaled.</p>\r\n<p><em><strong>Indicator 5: <span>Green Revenue Score</span></strong></em><br><em><strong>Weight:</strong></em> 20%<br><em><strong>Methodology</strong></em></p>\r\n<p>The Green Revenue Score is calculated by HIP Investor.</p>\r\n<p><span>The Green Revenue Score is obtained by breaking down a given company’s revenue into its various segments (according to its FTSE Industry Classification Benchmark, a widely used standard for listed companies) to determine the percentage of a company's revenue that is green — i.e., derived from products and services that contribute positively to environmental sustainability and societal health.</span></p>\r\n<p>For example, if Company A’s revenue is broken down as Medical Equipment (60 percent) and Pharmaceuticals (40 percent) and the Segment Green Rating for Medical Equipment is 0.75 and Pharmaceuticals is 0.7, Company A’s Green Revenue Score is (60 percent x 0.75 + 40 percent x 0.7) = 73 percent.</p>\r\n<p><em><strong><span>Indicator 6: </span>Green Pay Link<br>Weight:</strong></em> 10%<br><em><strong>Methodology: </strong></em>Mechanisms that link senior executive pay to corporate environmental performance. Yes =10 percent. No = 0 percent.</p>\r\n<p><em><strong>Indicator 7: <span>Sustainability Board Committee</span></strong></em><br><em><strong>Weight:</strong></em> 5%<br><em><strong>Methodology: </strong></em>A committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters. Yes =10 percent. No = 0 percent.</p>\r\n<p><em><strong>Indicator 8: <span>Audited Environmental Metrics</span></strong></em><br><em><strong>Weight:</strong></em> 5%<br><em><strong>Methodology: </strong></em>Audit of 2013 environmental metrics by a third party. Yes =10 percent. No = 0 percent.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2091,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1042,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Newsweek+Newsweek_Green_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46699,
      "name": "Newsweek+Newsweek Reputation Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Newsweek+Newsweek_Reputation_Score.json",
      "designer": "Newsweek",
      "title": "Newsweek Reputation Score",
      "question": "A score related to the company's reputation, based on data from RepRisk",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The Reputation score is made up of two components: (1) The RepRisk Index, which is a quantitative measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company exposure to ESG risks. It ranges from zero (lowest) to 100 (highest); the higher the value, the higher the ESG risks exposure. The RepRisk Index value is percent-ranked against all companies in the ranking and multiplied by 0.5. (2) The second component is based on the number of environmental issues that were identified by RepRisk for each company. The environmental issues are: global pollution and climate change, local pollution, impacts on ecosystems and landscapes, overuse and wasting of resources and waste issues; the total number of environmental issues for each company is percent-ranked against all Industry Group peers in the ranking and multiplied by 0.5. The Reputation Score is the sum of the scores from the two above components. Companies whose sub-industry group is _tobacco_ and which are deriving the majority of their revenue from weapons manufacturing and related products/services automatically get a zero for the Reputation Score.",
      "methodology": "http://www.newsweek.com/2014-newsweek-green-rankings-243744",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reputational Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 447,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 446,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Newsweek+Newsweek_Reputation_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46705,
      "name": "Newsweek+Energy Productivity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Newsweek+Energy_Productivity.json",
      "designer": "Newsweek",
      "title": "Energy Productivity",
      "question": "What's the company's efficiency in energy use as compared to other companies in their industry?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>As a first step, each company's Energy Productivity is calculated for 2012, with Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ). Each company's Energy Productivity is then percent-ranked against that of all Industry Group peers in the CKC research universe and multiplied by 0.75. The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) definition of \"Industry Group\" will be used. In the second step, the change in each company's Energy Productivity from 2010-2012 is calculated and percent-ranked against that of all same-Industry Group peers within the CKC research universe. If the company's percent-ranked 2012 Energy Productivity is top quartile, their percent-ranked change in Energy Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 1 and then by 0.25. If the company's percent-ranked 2012 Energy Productivity is second quartile, their percent-ranked change in Energy Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.75 and then by 0.25. If the company's percent-ranked 2012 Energy Productivity is third quartile, their percent-ranked change in Energy Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.5 and then by 0.25. If the company's percent-ranked 2012 Energy Productivity is bottom quartile, their percent-ranked change in Energy Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.25 and then by 0.25. In the third step, the values from the first and second steps are totaled.</p>",
      "methodology": "http://www.newsweek.com/2014-newsweek-green-rankings-243744",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "1-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2137,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 951,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Newsweek+Energy_Productivity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46714,
      "name": "Newsweek+Greenhouse Gas Productivity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Newsweek+Greenhouse_Gas_Productivity.json",
      "designer": "Newsweek",
      "title": "Greenhouse Gas Productivity",
      "question": "A measure of the company's productivity in relation to greenhouse gas emissions as compared to other companies in their industry",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In the first step, each company's GHG Productivity is calculated for 2012, with GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e). Only Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions are included according to the GHG Protocol. Each company_s GHG Productivity is then percent-ranked against that of all Industry Group peers in the CKC research universe and multiplied by 0.75. In the second step, the change in each company_s GHG Productivity from 2010-2012 is calculated and percent-ranked against that of all same-industry group peers within the CKC research universe. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 GHG Productivity is top quartile, their percent-ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 1 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 GHG Productivity is second quartile, their percent-ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.75 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 GHG Productivity is third quartile, their percente ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.5 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 GHG Productivity is bottom quartile, their percent-ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.25 and then by 0.25. In the third step, the values from the first and second steps are totaled and then multiplied by 0.9. In the fourth step, if the company disclosed Scope 3 GHG emissions in 2012, a score of 100% is attributed and then multiplied by 0.1. Otherwise, a score of 0% is given. In the final step, the scores from the third and fourth steps are added.",
      "methodology": "http://www.newsweek.com/2014-newsweek-green-rankings-243744",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "1-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 374,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 372,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Newsweek+Greenhouse_Gas_Productivity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46723,
      "name": "Newsweek+Water Productivity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Newsweek+Water_Productivity.json",
      "designer": "Newsweek",
      "title": "Water Productivity",
      "question": "A measure of the company's productivity in relation to water usage as compared to other companies in their industry",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In the first step, each company's Water Productivity is calculated for 2012. Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3). Each company_s Water Productivity is then percent-ranked against that of all Industry Group peers in the CKC research universe and multiplied by 0.75. In the second step, the change in each company_s Water Productivity from 2010-2012 is calculated and percent-ranked against that of all same-industry group peers within the CKC research universe. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 Water Productivity is top quartile, their percent-ranked change in Water Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 1 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 Water Productivity is second quartile, their percent-ranked change in Water Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.75 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 WaterProductivity is third quartile, their percent-ranked change in Water Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.5 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 Water Productivity is bottom quartile, their percent-ranked change in Water Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.25 and then by 0.25. In the third step, the values from the first and second steps are totaled.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>http://www.newsweek.com/2014-newsweek-green-rankings-243744</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "1-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2010,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 940,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Newsweek+Water_Productivity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46732,
      "name": "Newsweek+Waste Productivity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Newsweek+Waste_Productivity.json",
      "designer": "Newsweek",
      "title": "Waste Productivity",
      "question": "A measure of the company's productivity in relation to resulting waste, as compared to other companies in their industry",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In the first step, each company's Waste Productivity is calculated for 2012. Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) _ waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)]. Each company_s Waste Productivity is then percent-ranked against that of all Industry Group peers in the CKC research universe and multiplied by 0.75. In the second step, the change in each company_s Waste Productivity from 2010-2012 is calculated and percent-ranked against that of all same-industry group peers within the CKC research universe. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 Waste Productivity is top quartile, their percent-ranked change in Waste Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 1 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 Waste Productivity is second quartile, their percent-ranked change in Waste Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.75 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 Waste Productivity is third quartile, their percent-ranked change in Waste Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.5 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 Waste Productivity is bottom quartile, their percent-ranked change in Waste Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.25 and then by 0.25. In the third step, the values from the first and second steps are totaled.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>http://www.newsweek.com/2014-newsweek-green-rankings-243744</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "1-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1955,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 927,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Newsweek+Waste_Productivity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46742,
      "name": "Good Company Index+Good Company Grade",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Good_Company_Index+Good_Company_Grade.json",
      "designer": "Good Company Index",
      "title": "Good Company Grade",
      "question": "Overall grade awarded by the Good Company Index",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>\"Good Company\" examines specific company behavior through three primary roles: how the company acts as an employer, as a seller, and as a steward of the community and environment. A good company is one that starts with good intentions and then puts those into practice concretely through its actions in these three areas. </p>",
      "methodology": "http://www.goodcompanyindex.com/pdfs/GoodCompanyIndex-2014-Methodology.pdf",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "A",
        "B+",
        "B",
        "B-",
        "C+",
        "C",
        "C-",
        "D+",
        "D",
        "D-",
        "F"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 246,
      "bookmarkers": 11,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Good_Company_Index+Good_Company_Grade+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46747,
      "name": "Good Company Index+Good Employer Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Good_Company_Index+Good_Employer_Score.json",
      "designer": "Good Company Index",
      "title": "Good Employer Score",
      "question": "Good Company Index score for treatment of employees (range from -2 to +2)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Based on company's rating on Glassdoor and whether or not they were listed in the Fortune 100 \"Best Companies to Work for\" list",
      "methodology": "http://www.goodcompanyindex.com/pdfs/GoodCompanyIndex-2014-Methodology.pdf",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 246,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Good_Company_Index+Good_Employer_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46754,
      "name": "Good Company Index+Good Steward Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Good_Company_Index+Good_Steward_Score.json",
      "designer": "Good Company Index",
      "title": "Good Steward Score",
      "question": "Good Company Index score for environmental impact",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Based on a number of sources (see methodology)",
      "methodology": "http://www.goodcompanyindex.com/pdfs/GoodCompanyIndex-2014-Methodology.pdf",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 246,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Good_Company_Index+Good_Steward_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46762,
      "name": "BSR+BSR Member",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BSR+BSR_Member.json",
      "designer": "BSR",
      "title": "BSR Member",
      "question": "Is the company a member of BSR (Business for Social Responsibility)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "BSR is a global nonprofit business network and consultancy dedicated to sustainability.",
      "methodology": "<p>To check whether a company you're searching form is a BSR (Business for Social Responsibility) member, check this BSR member [[http://wikirate.org/Page_000003854| list]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "true"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 155,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 154,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BSR+BSR_Member+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46768,
      "name": "EICC+EICC member",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/EICC+EICC_member.json",
      "designer": "EICC",
      "title": "EICC member",
      "question": "Is the company a member of the EICC (Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The EICC is the world's largest industry coalition dedicated to electronics supply chain responsibility.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>From the EICC [[http://www.eiccoalition.org/about/members/| members]] page, check whether the company is listed as an EICC member.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "true"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 44,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 44,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/EICC+EICC_member+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46774,
      "name": "PERI at University of Massachusetts Amherst+Toxic 100 Air Polluters Rank",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/PERI_at_University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst+Toxic_100_Air_Polluters_Rank.json",
      "designer": "PERI at University of Massachusetts Amherst",
      "title": "Toxic 100 Air Polluters Rank",
      "question": "If the company was named by PERI as one of the \"Toxic 100\" Air Polluters, What is their rank?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI), compiled by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in accordance with the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986, annually reports the weight (in pounds) of each of approximately 600 toxic chemicals released into the environment by major industrial facilities in the United States.</p>\r\n<p>The Political Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts AMHERST uses the Toxic 100 Air Polluters index to identify the top U.S. air polluters among the world's largest corporations.</p>\r\n<p>[[http://www.peri.umass.edu/tech_notes/| Source]]</p>",
      "methodology": "http://www.peri.umass.edu/tech_notes/",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "ranked",
      "range": "1-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 199,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 134,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/PERI_at_University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst+Toxic_100_Air_Polluters_Rank+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46781,
      "name": "PERI at University of Massachusetts Amherst+Toxic Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/PERI_at_University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst+Toxic_Score.json",
      "designer": "PERI at University of Massachusetts Amherst",
      "title": "Toxic Score",
      "question": "A measure of toxic releases in the US which takes toxicity and the exposure of the population into account.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI), compiled by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in accordance with the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986, annually reports the weight (in pounds) of each of approximately 600 toxic chemicals released into the environment by major industrial facilities in the United States.</p>\r\n<p>The Political Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts AMHERST uses the Toxic 100 Air Polluters index to identify the top U.S. air polluters among the world's largest corporations.</p>\r\n<p>[[http://www.peri.umass.edu/tech_notes/| Source]]</p>\r\n<p>This is a formula metric which looks for the volume of toxic material released in the United States X Toxicity X Population Exposure.</p>",
      "methodology": "http://www.peri.umass.edu/tech_notes/",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 99,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 99,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/PERI_at_University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst+Toxic_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46788,
      "name": "PERI at University of Massachusetts Amherst+Toxic Incineration Transfers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/PERI_at_University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst+Toxic_Incineration_Transfers.json",
      "designer": "PERI at University of Massachusetts Amherst",
      "title": "Toxic Incineration Transfers",
      "question": "How much toxic material did the company send for incineration in the United States?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI), compiled by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in accordance with the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986, annually reports the weight (in pounds) of each of approximately 600 toxic chemicals released into the environment by major industrial facilities in the United States.</p>\r\n<p>The Political Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts AMHERST uses the Toxic 100 Air Polluters index to identify the top U.S. air polluters among the world's largest corporations.</p>\r\n<p>[[http://www.peri.umass.edu/tech_notes/| Source]]</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "http://www.peri.umass.edu/tech_notes/",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Million Pounds",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 199,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 134,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/PERI_at_University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst+Toxic_Incineration_Transfers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46795,
      "name": "PERI at University of Massachusetts Amherst+Toxic Air Releases",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/PERI_at_University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst+Toxic_Air_Releases.json",
      "designer": "PERI at University of Massachusetts Amherst",
      "title": "Toxic Air Releases",
      "question": "How much toxic material did the company release into the air in the United States?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI), compiled by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in accordance with the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986, annually reports the weight (in pounds) of each of approximately 600 toxic chemicals released into the environment by major industrial facilities in the United States.</p>\r\n<p>The Political Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts AMHERST uses the Toxic 100 Air Polluters index to identify the top U.S. air polluters among the world's largest corporations.</p>\r\n<p>[[http://www.peri.umass.edu/tech_notes/| Source]]</p>\r\n<p>This metric calculates the company's release of toxic materials into the air in the United States (measured in millions of pounds).</p>",
      "methodology": "http://www.peri.umass.edu/tech_notes/",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "millions of pounds",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 199,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 134,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/PERI_at_University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst+Toxic_Air_Releases+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46810,
      "name": "Measure UP+Living Wage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Living_Wage.json",
      "designer": "Measure UP",
      "title": "Living Wage",
      "question": "Does the company have evidence that suppliers are paid enough for workers to be given a living wage?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Company's position is classified as \"Yes\", \"No\" or \"Making Progress\"",
      "methodology": "http://www.measureup.org.uk/indicators/",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Making Progress"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 11,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 11,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Living_Wage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46817,
      "name": "Measure UP+Confidential Audit Interviews",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Confidential_Audit_Interviews.json",
      "designer": "Measure UP",
      "title": "Confidential Audit Interviews",
      "question": "Do audits include confidential interviews with workers selected by the auditor (not, for example, management)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Companies position is classified as \"Yes\", \"No\" or \"Making Progress\"",
      "methodology": "http://www.measureup.org.uk/indicators/",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Making Progress"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Confidential_Audit_Interviews+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46824,
      "name": "Measure UP+Unannounced Factory Checks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Unannounced_Factory_Checks.json",
      "designer": "Measure UP",
      "title": "Unannounced Factory Checks",
      "question": "Are unannounced checks or audits routinely carried out at factories?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Company's position is classified as \"Yes\", \"No\" or \"Making Progress\"",
      "methodology": "http://www.measureup.org.uk/indicators/",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Making Progress"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Unannounced_Factory_Checks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46831,
      "name": "Measure UP+Factory Address List",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Factory_Address_List.json",
      "designer": "Measure UP",
      "title": "Factory Address List",
      "question": "Is a full list of the locations of the company_s supplier factories publicly available?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Companies position is classified as \"Yes\", \"No\" or \"Making Progress\"",
      "methodology": "http://www.measureup.org.uk/indicators/",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Making Progress"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 11,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Factory_Address_List+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46838,
      "name": "Measure UP+Worker Complaint Procedure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Worker_Complaint_Procedure.json",
      "designer": "Measure UP",
      "title": "Worker Complaint Procedure",
      "question": "Has the company put in place a mechanism by which factory workers can confidentially get in contact to raise issues of concern?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Companies position is classified as \"Yes\", \"No\" or \"Making Progress\"",
      "methodology": "http://www.measureup.org.uk/indicators/",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Making Progress"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Worker_Complaint_Procedure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46845,
      "name": "Measure UP+Code of conduct applies to supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Code_of_conduct_applies_to_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Measure UP",
      "title": "Code of conduct applies to supply chain",
      "question": "Is the full supply chain governed by the company_s code of conduct?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Companies position is classified as \"Yes\", \"No\" or \"Making Progress\"",
      "methodology": "http://www.measureup.org.uk/indicators/",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Making Progress"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Code_of_conduct_applies_to_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46852,
      "name": "Measure UP+Ethical Code of Conduct",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Ethical_Code_of_Conduct.json",
      "designer": "Measure UP",
      "title": "Ethical Code of Conduct",
      "question": "Does this company have an ethical code of conduct based on International Labour Organisation (ILO) standards?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Companies position is classified as \"Yes\", \"No\" or \"Making Progress\"",
      "methodology": "http://www.measureup.org.uk/indicators/",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Making Progress"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Ethical_Code_of_Conduct+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46859,
      "name": "Measure UP+Published Audit Results",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Published_Audit_Results.json",
      "designer": "Measure UP",
      "title": "Published Audit Results",
      "question": "Are the company_s social audit results publicly available?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Companies position is classified as \"Yes\", \"No\" or \"Making Progress\"",
      "methodology": "http://www.measureup.org.uk/indicators/",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "yes",
        "no",
        "making progress"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Published_Audit_Results+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46866,
      "name": "Measure UP+Factory Social Audits",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Factory_Social_Audits.json",
      "designer": "Measure UP",
      "title": "Factory Social Audits",
      "question": "Does the company ensure that each of its supplier factories receives a social audit at least every two years?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Companies position is classified as \"Yes\", \"No\" or \"Making Progress\"",
      "methodology": "http://www.measureup.org.uk/indicators/",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "yes",
        "no",
        "making progress"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Factory_Social_Audits+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46873,
      "name": "Measure UP+Staff Visit Factories",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Staff_Visit_Factories.json",
      "designer": "Measure UP",
      "title": "Staff Visit Factories",
      "question": "Do the company_s own staff routinely visit factories to carry out checks or audits?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Companies position is classified as \"Yes\", \"No\" or \"Making Progress\"",
      "methodology": "http://www.measureup.org.uk/indicators/",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "yes",
        "no",
        "making progress"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Measure_UP+Staff_Visit_Factories+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46881,
      "name": "Access to Nutrition Index+Marketing Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Access_to_Nutrition_Index+Marketing_Score.json",
      "designer": "Access to Nutrition Index",
      "title": "Marketing Score",
      "question": "How much does the company score in implementing responsible marketing policies?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Access to Nutrition Index (ATNI) is founded on the premise that Food &amp; Beverage manufacturers can make a strong contribution to addressing poor nutrition and related diseases. The ATNI assesses and ranks the world’s largest manufacturers based on their nutrition-related commitments, practices and performance globally.</p>\r\n<p>[[https://www.accesstonutrition.org/how-index-works| Source]]</p>\r\n<p>This metric considers policy, compliance with that policy, and overall spending - with regard to adults and children and captures the extent to which companies help consumers to make healthy choices by adopting responsible marketing practices and prioritizing the marketing of healthier products. The Category consists of two parallel groups of three criteria:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>All consumers</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>D1 Responsible marketing policy</p>\r\n<p>D2 Auditing and compliance with policy</p>\r\n<p>D3 Spending on marketing healthy products</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Children</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>D4 Responsible marketing policy</p>\r\n<p>D5 Auditing and compliance with policy</p>\r\n<p>D6 Spending on marketing healthy products</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To perform well in this Category, companies should:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Establish and implement a policy for marketing to all consumers that is comprehensive in its scope of guidance and applies equally to all media channels and all markets of operation. The policy should embrace and extend the requirements of the International Chambers of Commerce (ICC) general marketing code as well as the Framework for Responsible Food and Beverage Marketing Communications.</li>\r\n<li>Establish and implement a policy for responsible marketing to children that is comprehensive in its scope and applies equally to all media channels and all markets of operation.</li>\r\n<li>Ensure that the policy for marketing to children sets a low percentage threshold for defining a child audience, i.e. 25% or lower. The policy should also explicitly commit either not to market any products to children under twelve, or to only market healthy products which are defined using a robust Nutrient Profiling System (NPS). Commit to using only responsible marketing techniques, particularly with online media.</li>\r\n<li>Commission or take part in industry-level independent audits of compliance with these policies and disclose individual compliance levels or traditional and new media.</li>\r\n<li>Demonstrate concrete commitments and actions for delivering marketing strategies to reach undernourished populations in developing countries with appropriate products, and report on progress.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>http://www.accesstonutrition.org/methodology-0</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/10",
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 17,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Access_to_Nutrition_Index+Marketing_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46889,
      "name": "Access to Nutrition Index+Lifestyle Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Access_to_Nutrition_Index+Lifestyle_Score.json",
      "designer": "Access to Nutrition Index",
      "title": "Lifestyle Score",
      "question": "How well does the company score in its efforts to promoted and support healthy diets and active lifestyles to their staff and consumers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Access to Nutrition Index (ATNI) is founded on the premise that Food &amp; Beverage manufacturers can make a strong contribution to addressing poor nutrition and related diseases. The ATNI assesses and ranks the world’s largest manufacturers based on their nutrition-related commitments, practices and performance globally.</p>\r\n<p>[[https://www.accesstonutrition.org/how-index-works| Source]]</p>\r\n<p>This metric assesses the extent to which companies support such efforts through three criteria:</p>\r\n<p>E1 Supporting staff healthy and wellness</p>\r\n<p>E2 Supporting breastfeeding mothers in the workplace</p>\r\n<p>E3 Supporting consumer-oriented healthy diet and active lifestyle programs</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To perform well in this Category, companies should:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Offer comprehensive nutrition and healthy lifestyle programs within their overall staff health and wellness programs, for all employees and their families globally.</li>\r\n<li>Set and achieve (or exceed) targets for participation in these programs.</li>\r\n<li>Commission independent evaluations of the health and/or business impacts of these programs, and publish these evaluations.</li>\r\n<li>Offer supportive maternity leave policies, flexible working arrangements and appropriate workplace facilities for breastfeeding mothers when they return to work.</li>\r\n<li>Commit to support integrated, comprehensive consumer-oriented healthy diet and active lifestyle programs and campaigns in all major markets, developed and implemented by independent organizations with relevant expertise.</li>\r\n<li>Commit to not use brand-level sponsorship in association with these programs.</li>\r\n<li>Commission and publish independent evaluations to assess the health impacts that these programs deliver.</li>\r\n<li>Support third-party social marketing campaigns aimed at educating undernourished consumers (or those at risk of undernutrition) on a range of nutrition issues, including breastfeeding, the appropriate introduction of complementary foods, and the benefits of micronutrient supplementation, eating fortified products and a diverse diet.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>http://www.accesstonutrition.org/methodology-0</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/10",
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 17,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Access_to_Nutrition_Index+Lifestyle_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46897,
      "name": "Access to Nutrition Index+Accessibility Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Access_to_Nutrition_Index+Accessibility_Score.json",
      "designer": "Access to Nutrition Index",
      "title": "Accessibility Score",
      "question": "How well does the company score in terms of delivery of affordable, available products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Access to Nutrition Index (ATNI) is founded on the premise that Food &amp; Beverage manufacturers can make a strong contribution to addressing poor nutrition and related diseases. The ATNI assesses and ranks the world’s largest manufacturers based on their nutrition-related commitments, practices and performance globally.</p>\r\n<p>[[https://www.accesstonutrition.org/how-index-works| Source]]</p>\r\n<p>This metric considers product pricing and distribution.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To perform well in this Category, companies should:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>State a clear commitment and have a formal policy and targets on both affordability and availability of healthy and fortified products.</li>\r\n<li>Demonstrate a clear focus on low-income populations and show evidence of conducting market research to inform their strategies.</li>\r\n<li>Apply their approach to affordability and availability across all the markets they operate in - both developed and developing.</li>\r\n<li>Provide evidence of how they are delivering on their commitments.</li>\r\n<li>Publicly disclose their commitments and policies and report evidence of implementing their commitments.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>http://www.accesstonutrition.org/methodology-0</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/10",
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 16,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Access_to_Nutrition_Index+Accessibility_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46905,
      "name": "Access to Nutrition Index+Products Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Access_to_Nutrition_Index+Products_Score.json",
      "designer": "Access to Nutrition Index",
      "title": "Products Score",
      "question": "How well does the company score regarding the nutritional value of products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Access to Nutrition Index (ATNI) is founded on the premise that Food &amp; Beverage manufacturers can make a strong contribution to addressing poor nutrition and related diseases. The ATNI assesses and ranks the world’s largest manufacturers based on their nutrition-related commitments, practices and performance globally.</p>\r\n<p>[[https://www.accesstonutrition.org/how-index-works| Source]]</p>\r\n<p>This metric considers product formulation and nutrient profiling system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To perform well in this Category, companies should:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Make commitments and set targets for R&amp;D spending aimed at improving the nutritional quality of their portfolio.</li>\r\n<li>Set targets for negative and positive nutrients1 to improve the formulation of products across their entire global portfolio, setting a baseline and target year for achieving them.</li>\r\n<li>Demonstrate progress by tracking and publishing the percentage of products that meet the targets, the percentage of products that meet the overall healthy standard and the amount by which that level has increased between 2012 and 2014.</li>\r\n<li>Capture and publish the percentage of products that meet the standard they have set for products to be advertised to children in the U.S., EU and rest of the world.</li>\r\n<li>Demonstrate that healthy options are widely available across their brands for adults and children, and that portion and package sizes for snacks and indulgent products have been limited.</li>\r\n<li>Commit to offering healthy and appropriately fortified foods that help to address undernutrition.</li>\r\n<li>Show that they focus their efforts to tackle undernutrition, funded both commercially and philanthropically, on priority countries and populations. Disclose their commitments, targets and performance in a consistent way that is easy to understand.</li>\r\n<li>Adopt and disclose details of a robust NPS applied to all products in all markets.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>http://www.accesstonutrition.org/methodology-0</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/10",
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 13,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Access_to_Nutrition_Index+Products_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46913,
      "name": "Access to Nutrition Index+Governance Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Access_to_Nutrition_Index+Governance_Score.json",
      "designer": "Access to Nutrition Index",
      "title": "Governance Score",
      "question": "A score which reflects corporate nutrition strategy, management and reporting",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Access to Nutrition Index (ATNI) is founded on the premise that Food &amp; Beverage manufacturers can make a strong contribution to addressing poor nutrition and related diseases. The ATNI assesses and ranks the world’s largest manufacturers based on their nutrition-related commitments, practices and performance globally.</p>\r\n<p>[[https://www.accesstonutrition.org/how-index-works| Source]]</p>\r\n<p>This metric looks at whether a company can better sustain and scale-up its nutrition activities if its commitment starts at the top of the organization and is integrated into its core business strategy, and measures:</p>\r\n<p>A1 Corporate nutrition strategy</p>\r\n<p>A2 Nutrition governance and management systems</p>\r\n<p>A3 Quality of reporting</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To perform well in this Category, companies should:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Commit at Board level to address both obesity and diet-related chronic diseases and undernutrition.</li>\r\n<li>Set clear nutrition strategies, objectives and targetsin all business areas underpinned by strategic market research.</li>\r\n<li>Establish and use incentive and accountability structures at senior management level to reward successful implementation of nutrition strategies.</li>\r\n<li>Seek advice from formal expert bodies with a wide range of expertise.</li>\r\n<li>Demonstrate high and increasing levels of sales of healthy and fortified products.</li>\r\n<li>Pledge to direct undernutrition-related activities to priority population groups in priority countries, i.e. those with the highest levels of undernutrition and related illnesses.</li>\r\n<li>Clearly and comprehensively report on activities to prevent and address obesity and undernutrition, on a global basis.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>http://www.accesstonutrition.org/methodology-0</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/10",
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 17,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Access_to_Nutrition_Index+Governance_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46920,
      "name": "Access to Nutrition Index+Engagement Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Access_to_Nutrition_Index+Engagement_Score.json",
      "designer": "Access to Nutrition Index",
      "title": "Engagement Score",
      "question": "How much does the company score in its engagement with policymakers and other stakeholders?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Access to Nutrition Index (ATNI) is founded on the premise that Food &amp; Beverage manufacturers can make a strong contribution to addressing poor nutrition and related diseases. The ATNI assesses and ranks the world’s largest manufacturers based on their nutrition-related commitments, practices and performance globally.</p>\r\n<p>[[https://www.accesstonutrition.org/how-index-works| Source]]</p>\r\n<p>This metric focuses on companies’ engagement with governmental and non-governmental stakeholders on corporate nutrition practices and nutrition-related issues. Companies are assessed under two criteria:</p>\r\n<p>G1 Lobbying and influencing governments and policymakers</p>\r\n<p>G2 Stakeholder engagement</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To perform well in this Category, companies should:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Publish a policy on lobbying in a Code of Business Ethics, or similar format, which clearly extends to lobbying on nutrition issues.</li>\r\n<li>Disclose fully, on a global basis, their lobbying activities, including their positions on nutrition issues and their membership and funding of industry associations and lobbying organizations.</li>\r\n<li>Disclose any Board seats on such bodies and any potential governance conflicts of interest (or state that none exist).</li>\r\n<li>Commit to playing an active part in supporting the efforts of developing country governments to address undernutrition, and publish examples of such activities.</li>\r\n<li>Demonstrate a comprehensive, structured approach, following the AA1000 Standard (see Box 21).</li>\r\n<li>Provide evidence of extensive engagement with stakeholders to address both obesity and undernutrition on a global basis.</li>\r\n<li>Report on how the input received through stakeholder engagement is used to improve the company’s strategies, policies and/or practices.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>http://www.accesstonutrition.org/methodology-0</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/10",
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Access_to_Nutrition_Index+Engagement_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46927,
      "name": "Access to Nutrition Index+Access to Nutrition Overall Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Access_to_Nutrition_Index+Access_to_Nutrition_Overall_Score.json",
      "designer": "Access to Nutrition Index",
      "title": "Access to Nutrition Overall Score",
      "question": "The Access to Nutrition Index rates companies on their nutrition policies, practices, and performance.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Access to Nutrition Index (ATNI) is founded on the premise that Food &amp; Beverage manufacturers can make a strong contribution to addressing poor nutrition and related diseases. The ATNI assesses and ranks the world’s largest manufacturers based on their nutrition-related commitments, practices and performance globally.</p>\r\n<p>This is an overall score, a weighted average of the company's score in each category.</p>\r\n<p>https://www.accesstonutrition.org/</p>",
      "methodology": "http://www.accesstonutrition.org/methodology-0",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 22,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 17,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Access_to_Nutrition_Index+Access_to_Nutrition_Overall_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46935,
      "name": "Access to Nutrition Index+Labeling Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Access_to_Nutrition_Index+Labeling_Score.json",
      "designer": "Access to Nutrition Index",
      "title": "Labeling Score",
      "question": "What's the company's score reflecting its informative labeling and appropriate use of health and nutrition notes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Access to Nutrition Index (ATNI) is founded on the premise that Food &amp; Beverage manufacturers can make a strong contribution to addressing poor nutrition and related diseases. The ATNI assesses and ranks the world’s largest manufacturers based on their nutrition-related commitments, practices and performance globally.</p>\r\n<p>[[https://www.accesstonutrition.org/how-index-works| Source]]</p>\r\n<p>This metric considers how well the labels on products provide accurate, comprehensive and readily understandable information about the nutritional composition and potential health benefits of what they eat.</p>\r\n<p>The assessment is divided into two criteria:</p>\r\n<p>F1 Product labeling</p>\r\n<p>F2 Health and nutrition claims</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To perform well in this Category, companies should (in addition to observing national standards where they exist):</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Adopt and publish a global policy on labeling that: 1) commits to including all key nutrients on back-ofpack labels (energy, protein, total carbohydrates, total or added/free sugars, trans fat, total fat, saturated fat, dietary fiber, sodium (or salt); 2) presents this information as a percentage of guideline daily amounts or daily values; 3) provides the information appropriately for single and multiple portions; 4) commits to providing nutritional information on the front of packs in an interpretive format; and 5) commits to label the micronutrient content of all products sold in developing countries fortified with or naturally high in micronutrients.</li>\r\n<li>Have already rolled out, or plan to roll out, these labels across all markets and report on progress.</li>\r\n<li>Provide nutritional information online for all products in all markets in order to enhance consumers’ access to information about what they are eating.</li>\r\n<li>Adopt and publish a global policy on the use of both health and nutrition claims that states, in countries where no national regulatory system exists, these claims will only be placed on products if they are in full compliance with the relevant Codex standard.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>http://www.accesstonutrition.org/methodology-0</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/10",
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 15,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Access_to_Nutrition_Index+Labeling_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46944,
      "name": "Fair Labor Association+Fair Labor Participant",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fair_Labor_Association+Fair_Labor_Participant.json",
      "designer": "Fair Labor Association",
      "title": "Fair Labor Participant",
      "question": "Is the company a participant in the Fair Labor Association?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Since 1999, FLA has helped improve the lives of millions of workers around the world. As a collaborative effort of socially responsible companies, colleges and universities, and civil society organizations, FLA creates lasting solutions to abusive labor practices by offering tools and resources to companies, delivering training to factory workers and management, conducting due diligence through independent assessments, and advocating for greater accountability and transparency from companies, manufacturers, factories and others involved in global supply chains. FLA publishes reports on all assessments, complaints and investigations to ensure transparency and accountability.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 361,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 257,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Multi_stakeholder_Initiative_Memberships_MSIs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fair_Labor_Association+Fair_Labor_Participant+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46951,
      "name": "Access to Medicine Index+Access to Medicine Overall Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Access_to_Medicine_Index+Access_to_Medicine_Overall_Score.json",
      "designer": "Access to Medicine Index",
      "title": "Access to Medicine Overall Score",
      "question": "How did the company score in the Access to Medicine Index?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Access to Medicine Index <span>gives insight into what the pharmaceutical industry is doing to improve access to medicine across the world.</span><span> It independently ranks and evaluates the world's largest pharmaceutical companies </span><span>on their policies and practices for improving access to medicine</span><span> in developing countries and has been published every two years since 2008. </span></p>\r\n<p><span>20 companies were analysed by the 2014 Index which together accounts for more than 50% of the global pharmaceutical market.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>More detailed information is available here: http://www.accesstomedicineindex.org/ranking</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The framework is constructed along seven areas of focus, which cover the range of company business activities that experts consider most relevant to access to medicine. Within each area, the Index assesses four aspects of company action: commitment, transparency, performance and innovation. In 2014 there were 95 indicators.</p>\r\n<p>The Index is a relative ranking, where companies are compared with each other rather than against an absolute. The highest attainable scores for each indicator do not reflect an ideal characteristic of industry behaviour, but a culmination of stakeholder views of what can be reasonably expected of companies. Additionally, companies do not receive negative scores in indicators, meaning they can never score below zero.</p>\r\n<p>More detailed methodology is available here: http://www.accesstomedicineindex.org/methodology-0</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-5",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Access_to_Medicine_Index+Access_to_Medicine_Overall_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46959,
      "name": "Enough Project+Verification of refiners or smelters through third parties",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Verification_of_refiners_or_smelters_through_third_parties.json",
      "designer": "Enough Project",
      "title": "Verification of refiners or smelters through third parties",
      "question": "Has the company investigated and come to know precisely which companies refine/smelt the company's supply of 3TG, with third-party verification?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Companies must determine the precise sources of the minerals/metals used \rin their products. Efforts to develop rigorous means of ensuring that the origin and production volume of minerals are transparent are reviewed.",
      "methodology": "Scores based on company submissions in conjunction with publically available information; 0.5 pts for each metal investigated, 0.5 pts for each metal verified, max 4 pts.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/4",
      "range": "0-4",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Verification_of_refiners_or_smelters_through_third_parties+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46966,
      "name": "Enough Project+Publication of refiners",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Publication_of_refiners.json",
      "designer": "Enough Project",
      "title": "Publication of refiners",
      "question": "Has the company published the refiners it uses for 3TG?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Companies must determine the precise sources of the minerals/metals used \rin their products. Efforts to develop rigorous means of ensuring that the origin and production volume of minerals are transparent are reviewed.",
      "methodology": "Scores based on company submissions in conjunction with publically available information; 1 pt for each metal published, max 4 pts.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/4",
      "range": "0-4",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Publication_of_refiners+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46973,
      "name": "Enough Project+Refiner visits",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Refiner_visits.json",
      "designer": "Enough Project",
      "title": "Refiner visits",
      "question": "Has the company visited at least two of its refiners and inquired about the use of conflict minerals within the past year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Companies must determine the precise sources of the minerals/metals used \rin their products. Efforts to develop rigorous means of ensuring that the origin and production volume of minerals are transparent are reviewed.",
      "methodology": "Scores based on company submissions in conjunction with publically available information; Yes = 2 pts, No = 0 pts",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-2",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Refiner_visits+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46980,
      "name": "Enough Project+Stated policy of auditing suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Stated_policy_of_auditing_suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Enough Project",
      "title": "Stated policy of auditing suppliers",
      "question": "Does the company have a stated policy of auditing suppliers of 3TG metals?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies should have detailed examinations of their mineral supply chains conducted to ensure that a) minerals are not sourced from conflict mines and b) no illegal taxes/bribes are paid to armed groups in Congo. Credible third parties should conduct or verify these audits.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Scores based on company submissions in conjunction with publically available information; Yes = 1 pt for each metal (4 pts max), No = 0 pts</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/4",
      "range": "0-4",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Stated_policy_of_auditing_suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46987,
      "name": "Enough Project+Internal audits of suppliers' procurement practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Internal_audits_of_suppliers_procurement_practices.json",
      "designer": "Enough Project",
      "title": "Internal audits of suppliers' procurement practices",
      "question": "Has the company conducted internal audits of the procurement practices of 3TG suppliers down to the level of refiner, at least, within the last year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies should have detailed examinations of their mineral supply chains conducted to ensure that a) minerals are not sourced from conflict mines and b) no illegal taxes/bribes are paid to armed groups in Congo. Credible third parties should conduct or verify these audits.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Scores based on company submissions in conjunction with publically available information; Yes = 1 pt for each metal (4 pts max), No = 0 pts</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/4",
      "range": "0-4",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Internal_audits_of_suppliers_procurement_practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 46994,
      "name": "Enough Project+Third-party audits of suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Third_party_audits_of_suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Enough Project",
      "title": "Third-party audits of suppliers",
      "question": "Has the company had third-party audits conducted of 3TG suppliers down to the level of refiner, at least, within the past year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies should have detailed examinations of their mineral supply chains conducted to ensure that a) minerals are not sourced from conflict mines and b) no illegal taxes/bribes are paid to armed groups in Congo. Credible third parties should conduct or verify these audits.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Scores based on company submissions in conjunction with publically available information; Yes = 1 pt for each metal (4 pts max), No = 0 pts</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/4",
      "range": "0-4",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Third_party_audits_of_suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 47001,
      "name": "Enough Project+Participation in CFS program",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Participation_in_CFS_program.json",
      "designer": "Enough Project",
      "title": "Participation in CFS program",
      "question": "Has the company participated in the Extractives Work Group for the EICC-GeSI conflict-free smelter program (CFS)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies should have detailed examinations of their mineral supply chains conducted to ensure that a) minerals are not sourced from conflict mines and b) no illegal taxes/bribes are paid to armed groups in Congo. Credible third parties should conduct or verify these audits.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Scores based on company submissions in conjunction with publically available information; Yes = 2 pts, No = 0 pts</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/2",
      "range": "0-2",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Participation_in_CFS_program+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 47008,
      "name": "Enough Project+Financial support for audits",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Financial_support_for_audits.json",
      "designer": "Enough Project",
      "title": "Financial support for audits",
      "question": "Has the company provided financial support for auditing for 3TG?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Companies should have detailed examinations of their mineral supply chains \rconducted to ensure that a) minerals are not sourced from conflict mines and b) no \rillegal taxes/bribes are paid to armed groups in Congo. Credible third parties should conduct or verify these audits.",
      "methodology": "Scores based on company submissions in conjunction with publically available information; Yes = 4 pts for support >$100K, 2 pts for support >$50K, 1 pt for support <$50K",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/4",
      "range": "0-4",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Financial_support_for_audits+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 47015,
      "name": "Enough Project+Development of verifiably conflict-free products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Development_of_verifiably_conflict_free_products.json",
      "designer": "Enough Project",
      "title": "Development of verifiably conflict-free products",
      "question": "Has the company developed at least one verifiably conflict-free product, with independently audited supply chains all the way to the point of extraction?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Companies should have detailed examinations of their mineral supply chains \rconducted to ensure that a) minerals are not sourced from conflict mines and b) no \rillegal taxes/bribes are paid to armed groups in Congo. Credible third parties should conduct or verify these audits.",
      "methodology": "Scores based on company submissions in conjunction with publically available information; Yes = 4 pts, No = 0 pts",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/4",
      "range": "0-4",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Development_of_verifiably_conflict_free_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 47022,
      "name": "Enough Project+Stated policy of support for certification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Stated_policy_of_support_for_certification.json",
      "designer": "Enough Project",
      "title": "Stated policy of support for certification",
      "question": "Does the company have a stated policy of support for certification?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "For consumers to be able to purchase conflict-free electronics made with \rCongolese minerals, a certification scheme that builds upon the lessons of the \rKimberley Process will be required. This would be aimed at setting up conflict-free \rmines in Congo that help communities. Donor governments and industry should \rprovide financial and technical assistance to galvanize this process.",
      "methodology": "Scores based on company submissions in conjunction with publically available information; Yes = 2 pts, No = 0 pts",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/2",
      "range": "0-2",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Stated_policy_of_support_for_certification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 47029,
      "name": "Enough Project+Public statements in support of certification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Public_statements_in_support_of_certification.json",
      "designer": "Enough Project",
      "title": "Public statements in support of certification",
      "question": "Has the company made public statements in support of certification?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "For consumers to be able to purchase conflict-free electronics made with \rCongolese minerals, a certification scheme that builds upon the lessons of the \rKimberley Process will be required. This would be aimed at setting up conflict-free \rmines in Congo that help communities. Donor governments and industry should \rprovide financial and technical assistance to galvanize this process.",
      "methodology": "Scores based on company submissions in conjunction with publically available information; Yes = 2 pts, No = 0 pts",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/2",
      "range": "0-2",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Public_statements_in_support_of_certification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 47036,
      "name": "Enough Project+Financial support for certification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Financial_support_for_certification.json",
      "designer": "Enough Project",
      "title": "Financial support for certification",
      "question": "Has the company provided financial support for certification? Participation in the Public Private Alliance (PPA) would count for points; PPA is a step toward certification but not certification, as per the definition: certification as a multi-stakeholder process similar to the Kimberley and/or Forest Stewardship Council processes, which would be an international regime to trace, audit, and certify 3TG metals as being conflict-free. ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "For consumers to be able to purchase conflict-free electronics made with \rCongolese minerals, a certification scheme that builds upon the lessons of the \rKimberley Process will be required. This would be aimed at setting up conflict-free \rmines in Congo that help communities. Donor governments and industry should \rprovide financial and technical assistance to galvanize this process.",
      "methodology": "Scores based on company submissions in conjunction with publically available information; Yes = 2 pts for support > $500K, 1.5 pts for support >$200K, 1 pt for support <$200K, No = 0 pts",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/2",
      "range": "0-2",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Financial_support_for_certification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 47043,
      "name": "Enough Project+Participation in OECD Due Diligence Guidance",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Participation_in_OECD_Due_Diligence_Guidance.json",
      "designer": "Enough Project",
      "title": "Participation in OECD Due Diligence Guidance",
      "question": "Has the company participated in the process for developing the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict- Affected and High Risk Areas and did it commit to piloting the guidance?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "For consumers to be able to purchase conflict-free electronics made with \rCongolese minerals, a certification scheme that builds upon the lessons of the \rKimberley Process will be required. This would be aimed at setting up conflict-free \rmines in Congo that help communities. Donor governments and industry should \rprovide financial and technical assistance to galvanize this process.",
      "methodology": "Scores based on company submissions in conjunction with publically available information; Yes = 2 pts, No = 0 pts",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/2",
      "range": "0-2",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Participation_in_OECD_Due_Diligence_Guidance+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 47050,
      "name": "Enough Project+Meetings with NGO coalition regarding conflict minerals inquiries",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Meetings_with_NGO_coalition_regarding_conflict_minerals_inquiries.json",
      "designer": "Enough Project",
      "title": "Meetings with NGO coalition regarding conflict minerals inquiries",
      "question": "Did the company meet with the NGO coalition regarding inquiries on conflict minerals? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies should disclose whether they have met with the NGO coalition regarding inquiries on conflict minerals in their supply chains to ensure that a) minerals are not sourced from conflict mines and b) no illegal taxes/bribes are paid.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Scores based on company submissions in conjunction with publically available information; Yes = 1 pt, No = 0 pt</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Meetings_with_NGO_coalition_regarding_conflict_minerals_inquiries+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 47056,
      "name": "Enough Project+Communication with NGO coalition regarding conflict minerals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Communication_with_NGO_coalition_regarding_conflict_minerals.json",
      "designer": "Enough Project",
      "title": "Communication with NGO coalition regarding conflict minerals",
      "question": "Has the company held regular communication with NGO coalition regarding conflict minerals (at least bi-monthly)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metrics considers whether a company holds regular communication with the NGO coalition regarding conflict minerals on at least a bi-monthly basis.</p>",
      "methodology": "Scores based on company submissions in conjunction with publically available information; Yes = 1 pt, No = 0 pt",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/1",
      "range": "0-1",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Communication_with_NGO_coalition_regarding_conflict_minerals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 47062,
      "name": "Enough Project+Participation with the SEC",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Participation_with_the_SEC.json",
      "designer": "Enough Project",
      "title": "Participation with the SEC",
      "question": "Did the company participate in the Multi-stakeholder Group of NGOs, companies, and investors to the SEC and sign on to the Group's letters? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric considers whether companies participate in the Multi-stakeholder Group of NGOs, companies, and investors to the SEC and sign on to the Group's letters?</p>",
      "methodology": "Scores based on company submissions in conjunction with publically available information; Yes = 2 pts, No = 0 pts",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/2",
      "range": "0-2",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Participation_with_the_SEC+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 47068,
      "name": "Enough Project+Statement of advocacy for legislation in Europe on conflict minerals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Statement_of_advocacy_for_legislation_in_Europe_on_conflict_minerals.json",
      "designer": "Enough Project",
      "title": "Statement of advocacy for legislation in Europe on conflict minerals",
      "question": "Did the company issue a statement advocating for legislation in Europe on conflict minerals?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric considers whether a company issue a statement advocating for legislation in Europe on conflict minerals.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Scores based on company submissions in conjunction with publically available information; Yes = 2 pts, No = 0 pts</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "0-2",
      "range": "/2",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Statement_of_advocacy_for_legislation_in_Europe_on_conflict_minerals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 47074,
      "name": "Enough Project+Public statement regarding SRC regulations lawsuit",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Public_statement_regarding_SRC_regulations_lawsuit.json",
      "designer": "Enough Project",
      "title": "Public statement regarding SRC regulations lawsuit",
      "question": "Did the company issue a public statement against the threatened lawsuit against the SEC regulations on conflict minerals by the Chamber of Commerce? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies disclose whether they oppose the threatened lawsuit against the SEC regulations on conflict minerals by the Chamber of Commerce.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Scores based on company submissions in conjunction with publically available information; Yes = 2 pts, No = 0 pts</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "0-2",
      "range": "/2",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Enough_Project+Public_statement_regarding_SRC_regulations_lawsuit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 155071,
      "name": "EIC+EICC member",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/EIC+EICC_member.json",
      "designer": "EIC",
      "title": "EICC member",
      "question": "Is the company a member of the EICC (Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The EICC is the world's largest industry coalition dedicated to electronics supply chain responsibility. This metric answers whether a company a member of the EICC (Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition)</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The EICC is the world's largest industry coalition dedicated to electronics supply chain responsibility.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "true"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/EIC+EICC_member+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 168322,
      "name": "Ethical Trading Initiative+ETI Membership",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Ethical_Trading_Initiative+ETI_Membership.json",
      "designer": "Ethical Trading Initiative",
      "title": "ETI Membership",
      "question": "Is the company an ETI Member, and if so, what is its membership status?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The <a href=\"https://www.ethicaltrade.org/\">Ethical Trading Initiative</a> (ETI) is a leading alliance of companies, trade unions and NGOs that promotes respect for workers' rights around the globe. Their vision is a world where all workers are free from exploitation and discrimination, and enjoy conditions of freedom, security and equity.</p>\r\n<p><strong>What is ethical trade?</strong></p>\r\n<p>Ethical trade means that retailers, brands and their suppliers take responsibility for improving the working conditions of the people who make the products they sell. Most of these workers are employed by supplier companies around the world, many of them based in poor countries where laws designed to protect workers' rights are inadequate or not enforced.</p>\r\n<p>Companies with a commitment to ethical trade adopt a code of labour practice that they expect all their suppliers to work towards. Such codes address issues like wages, hours of work, health and safety and the right to join free trade unions.</p>\r\n<p><strong>ETI Base Code</strong><br><br>1. Employment is freely chosen</p>\r\n<p>2. Freedom of association</p>\r\n<p>3. Working conditions are safe and hygienic</p>\r\n<p>4. Child labour shall not be used</p>\r\n<p>5. Living wages are paid</p>\r\n<p>6. Working hours are not excessive</p>\r\n<p>7. No discrimination is practiced</p>\r\n<p>8. Regular employment is provided</p>\r\n<p>9. No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>From the ETI [[http://wikirate.org/Page_000003884| member list]], check the status of the company you are researching. If your company is not on the list select the 'Not a member' option.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Full",
        "Resigned",
        "Terminated",
        "Foundation stage",
        "Suspended",
        "Not a member"
      ],
      "report_type": "Member List",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 699,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 280,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Multi_stakeholder_Initiative_Memberships_MSIs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Ethical_Trading_Initiative+ETI_Membership+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 168974,
      "name": "Rank a brand+Sustainability Grade",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Rank_a_brand+Sustainability_Grade.json",
      "designer": "Rank a brand",
      "title": "Sustainability Grade",
      "question": "A-E grade reflecting sustainability - awarded by rankabrand.org",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>A is the best rating, E is the worst.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>http://manual.rankabrand.com/wiki/Main_Page</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 17,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 17,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Rank_a_brand+Sustainability_Grade+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 169380,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Clean Energy Index",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Clean_Energy_Index.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Clean Energy Index",
      "question": "What is the company's clean energy index rate (%)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Clean Energy Index is calculated by Greenpeace based on estimates of power demand for evaluated facilities.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>See: http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/Global/usa/planet3/PDFs/2015ClickingClean.pdf</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 11,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Clean_Energy_Index+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 169665,
      "name": "CDP+Scope 2 Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/CDP+Scope_2_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "CDP",
      "title": "Scope 2 Emissions",
      "question": "How many tonnes of Scope 2 GHG Emissions has the company produced in the most recent reporting year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies report the emissions from the generation of purchased electricity that is consumed in its owned or controlled equipment or operations as scope 2. Scope 2 emissions are a special category of indirect emissions. For many companies, purchased electricity represents one of the largest sources of GHG emissions and the most significant opportunity to reduce these emissions. Accounting for scope 2 emissions allows companies to assess the risks and opportunities associated with changing electricity and GHG emissions costs.<br><br>For further information you can refer to the <a href=\"http://www.ghgprotocol.org/files/ghgp/public/ghg-protocol-revised.pdf\">Greenhouse Gas Protocol.</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies report the emissions from the generation of purchased electricity that is consumed in its owned or controlled equipment or operations as scope 2. Scope 2 emissions are a special category of indirect emissions. For many companies, purchased electricity represents one of the largest sources of GHG emissions and the most significant opportunity to reduce these emissions. Accounting for scope 2 emissions allows companies to assess the risks and opportunities associated with changing electricity and GHG emissions costs.<br><br>For further information you can refer to the [[http://www.ghgprotocol.org/files/ghgp/public/ghg-protocol-revised.pdf|Greenhouse Gas Protocol]]</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 295,
      "bookmarkers": 28,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 279,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_2.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Scope_2_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/CDP+Scope_2_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 170546,
      "name": "CDP+Scope 1 Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/CDP+Scope_1_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "CDP",
      "title": "Scope 1 Emissions",
      "question": "How many tonnes of Scope 1 GHG Emissions has the company produced in the most recent reporting year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>Companies report GHG emissions from sources they own or control as scope 1. Direct GHG emissions are principally the result of the following types of activities undertaken by the company:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Generation of electricity, heat, or steam. These emissions result from combustion of fuels in stationary sources, e.g., boilers, furnaces, turbines </li>\r\n<li>Physical or chemical processing. Most of these emissions result from manufacture or processing of chemicals and materials, e.g., cement, aluminum, adipic acid, ammonia manufacture, and waste processing</li>\r\n<li>Transportation of materials, products, waste, and employees. These emissions result from the combustion of fuels in  company owned/controlled mobile combustion sources (e.g., trucks, trains, ships, airplanes, buses, and cars)</li>\r\n<li>Fugitive emissions. These emissions result from intentional or unintentional releases, e.g., equipment leaks from joints, seals, packing, and gaskets; methane emissions from coal mines and venting; hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) emissions during the use of refrigeration and air conditioning equipment; and methane leakages from gas transport.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>For further information you can refer to the <a href=\"http://www.ghgprotocol.org/files/ghgp/public/ghg-protocol-revised.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Greenhouse Gas Protocol</a></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies report GHG emissions from sources they own or control as scope 1. Direct GHG emissions are principally the result of the following types of activities undertaken by the company:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Generation of electricity, heat, or steam. These emissions </span><span>result from combustion of fuels in stationary </span><span>sources, e.g., boilers, furnaces, turbines </span></li>\r\n<li><span>Physical or chemical processing. Most of these emissions r</span><span>esult from manufacture or processing of chemicals </span><span>and materials, e.g., cement, aluminum, adipic acid, </span><span>ammonia manufacture, and waste processing</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Transportation of materials, products, waste, and </span><span>employees. These emissions result from the combustion </span><span>of fuels in  company owned/controlled mobile </span><span>combustion sources (e.g., trucks, trains, ships, </span><span>airplanes, buses, and cars)</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Fugitive emissions. These emissions result from intentional </span><span>or unintentional releases, e.g., equipment leaks </span><span>from joints, seals, packing, and gaskets; methane </span><span>emissions from coal mines and venting; hydrofluorocarbon </span><span>(HFC) emissions during the use of refrigeration </span><span>and air conditioning equipment; and methane leakages </span><span>from gas transport.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>For further information you can refer to the [[http://www.ghgprotocol.org/files/ghgp/public/ghg-protocol-revised.pdf|Greenhouse Gas Protocol]]</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 296,
      "bookmarkers": 16,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 280,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_1.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Scope_1_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/CDP+Scope_1_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 171845,
      "name": "CDP+Disclosure Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/CDP+Disclosure_Score.json",
      "designer": "CDP",
      "title": "Disclosure Score",
      "question": "How transparent is the company in relation with their actions aimed at climate change mitigation, adaptation and transparency?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>CDP evaluates every year the level of transparency companies demonstrate in reporting their actions aimed at climate change mitigation and adaptation. This evaluation is based on the information companies voluntarily provide to the organization.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The number of points allocated to each question depends on the amount of data requested. Some questions have more than one point attached to a single piece of information where the information is of particularly high importance, e.g. the gross global Scope 1 emissions figure. Questions which allow text responses are usually judged according to how many of the required data points they achieve. These are set out in the CDP 2014 guidance, and in the detailed [[https://www.cdp.net/Documents/Guidance/2014/CDP-2014-Climate-Change-Scoring-Methodology.pdf|CDP methodology document]].</p>\r\n<p>At the end of scoring, the number of points a company has been awarded is divided by the maximum number that could have been awarded. The fraction is then converted to a percentage by multiplying by 100 and rounded to the nearest whole number.</p>\r\n<p>(Points awarded / points attainable) x 100 = Disclosure Score</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "CDP+Disclosure Score+Richard Mills"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 283,
      "bookmarkers": 7,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 277,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/CDP+Disclosure_Score+Richard_Mills.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/CDP+Disclosure_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 172956,
      "name": "CDP+Performance Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/CDP+Performance_Score.json",
      "designer": "CDP",
      "title": "Performance Score",
      "question": "How well is the company performing in relation with climate change mitigation, adaptation and transparency?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Based on the information companies provide to the organization, CDP conducts a thourough evaluation of the actions that are considered to contribute to climate change mitigation, adaptation and transparency. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Performance points are awarded for evidence provided in the CDP response of actions considered to contribute to climate change mitigation, adaptation and transparency. Actions considered to be more fundamental to progress on combating climate change are awarded more points. External verification/assurance of emissions data is rewarded under the performance scoring as it is considered that this potentially increases the usefulness of the information to decision makers and can act as a pre-qualifier of the data submitted that should be recognized when evaluating performance.</p>\r\n<p>The performance score is also based solely on a company's CDP response. To receive a performance score, a company must achieve a minimum disclosure score of 50. This is to ensure that the judgement is based on sufficient information.</p>\r\n<p><span>Performance scores are converted to percentages in a similar way to the disclosure score percentage is generated. </span><span>At the end of scoring, the number of points a company has been awarded is divided by the maximum number that could have been awarded. The fraction is then converted to a percentage by multiplying by 100 and rounded to the nearest whole number.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>(Points awarded / points attainable) x 100 = Disclosure Score<br></span></p>\r\n<p>The percentages are than grouped into bands and assigned a letter. The <span>percentage range of each of the bands has been set as follows:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>A</li>\r\n<li>A-</li>\r\n<li>B</li>\r\n<li>C</li>\r\n<li>D</li>\r\n<li>E</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span>Further details  can be found </span><span>n the CDP 2014 guidance, and in the detailed [[https://www.cdp.net/Documents/Guidance/2014/CDP-2014-Climate-Change-Scoring-Methodology.pdf|CDP methodology document]].</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "A",
        "A-",
        "B",
        "C",
        "D",
        "E",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "CDP+Performance Score+Richard Mills"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 282,
      "bookmarkers": 8,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 274,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/CDP+Performance_Score+Richard_Mills.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/CDP+Performance_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 175573,
      "name": "Richard Mills+Publishes Smelters & Refiners",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Publishes_Smelters_Refiners.json",
      "designer": "Richard Mills",
      "title": "Publishes Smelters & Refiners",
      "question": "Does the company publish a list of the smelters and refiners it deals with?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Armed groups in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) benefit from the trade of gold, tin, tungsten and tantalum (3TG) mined in the region. These minerals are used in the production of a wide variety of goods. When these minerals are sourced from the DRC region they are commonly referred to as 'Conflict Minerals', their purchase supports armed groups and is contributing to an emergency humanitarian crisis. </p>\r\n<p>One of the major issues here is supply chain opacity - the companies who sell us goods containing these minerals often do not know where they came from originally. The companies who produce products containing these minerals buy them in a refined form from refiners or smelters, they do not buy the ore directly. It is therefore the refining and smelting companies who must be audited to determine if they trade in conflict minerals.</p>\r\n<p>One of the best things the large production companies we are familiar with can do to help with this issue is to make their supply chain more transparent by publishing a full list of the refiners and smelters they deal with.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Anyone can research the appropriate metric value for a company on Wikirate</strong> by looking for a published list of their refiners and smelters and entering what they find as a metric value. When you find a published list of refiners and smelters give the company a value of \"Yes\", add the document containing that list as a source and set the value's year to the year when the document was published. If you search for this kind of list but don't find it, give the company a value of \"No\" and submit the places you looked for the list as sources.</p>\r\n<p>There is a methodology you can follow to conduct this search. [[http://www.sec.gov/News/Overview/Detail/Overview/1365171562058<span>| </span><span>Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act]] mandates that companies who are registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and who use these minerals must submit a report every year describing their efforts to ensure they they are not using Conflict Minerals. If a company which files with the SEC has published a full list of refiners and smelters this is very likely to be found within the documents they submit to the SEC. <strong>Companies that don't file these reports with the SEC might still publish a list of smelters/refiners, a google search for something like \"Company list of smelters\" will often reveal a list.</strong></span></p>\r\n<p><span>You can find a company's SEC filings related to section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act by following this procedure:</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>1.</strong> Search for the company you want to research using the [[http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html | <span>EDGAR company filings search</span><span>]]. Find the right company and click its \"CIK\" number. - Have a look at the [[Determine_whether_companies_published_a_3TG_smelter_or_refiner_list|related project]] to see which companies still require values and you might want to search for.<br></span></p>\r\n<p><span>{{EDGAR-search-example-1|size:large}}</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>2.</strong> The next page may contain a lot of filings, we're looking for one which has a name like \"SD\" - click the Documents button for that filing. EDGAR provides a filtering function; type \"SD\" in the edit box \"Filing type:\". There may be more than one SD filing listed, one for every year since 2014.</p>\r\n<p><span>{{EDGAR-search-example-2|size:large}}</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>3.</strong> Some companies only submit an SD form, others also submit a Conflict Minerals Report as an \"exhibit\". In Apple's case all of the information is in the Conflict Minerals Report exhibit, but for other companies you may need to check both the SD form and any exhibits associated with it.</p>\r\n<p><span>{{EDGAR-search-example-3|size:large}}</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>4.</strong> If these documents contain a list of Smelters and Refiners it is usually quite easy to find (because its long) - you can use the URL of the filing document as a source, and many companies also provide a pdf version somewhere on their own website (this is actually a requirement of the Act) which you could also use as a source.</p>\r\n<p><span>{{Example-Table|size:large}}</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>5. </strong>Add a value to this metric. If you encounter any difficulties, or spot any problems with this methodology, please leave a comment below.</p>\r\n<p><span>{{EDGAR-search-example-4|size:large}}</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Some"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 42,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 38,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Publishes_Smelters_Refiners+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 176616,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Operational GHG emissions and RE supply",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Operational_GHG_emissions_and_RE_supply.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Operational GHG emissions and RE supply",
      "question": "How much does the company score vis-a-vis operational GHG emissions &amp; RE supply?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The 18th Edition of the Guide to Greener Electronics was published by Greenpeace in November 2012 with an updated methodology that were meant to reflect progress within the industry since 2006 and to set a new challenge for the industry to become more sustainable across company operations and supply chains. </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>\"Greenpeace assesses companies based only on their public information and practice to ensure the ranking is transparent. Companies can be held publicly accountable when they do make commitments. Making changes public also helps drive competition between the companies. The only criterion where nonpublic information is accepted is on advocacy, where a company may have voiced a clear position to relevant decision makers but does not make this public.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Further information concerning the methodology is available in the [[http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/initiatives/climate-change/cool-it/Initiative-analysis/Guide-to-Greener-Electronics/FAQ/]].\"</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/8",
      "range": "0-8",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 16,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Operational_GHG_emissions_and_RE_supply+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 379877,
      "name": "Sara Cifani+Elimination of PVC from products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sara_Cifani+Elimination_of_PVC_from_products.json",
      "designer": "Sara Cifani",
      "title": "Elimination of PVC from products",
      "question": "Has the company eliminated PVC from its products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The use of PVC (Polyvinyl Chloride) in electronic products has long been identified as a source of concern related to the risk it carries for human health and for the environment as a whole. Nevertheless, it is still widely used for its specific properties. </p>\r\n<p>For more information about the impacts of PVC on electronic products see: http://www.usgbc.org/Docs/LEED_tsac/PVC/CMPBS%20Original%20Submittal.pdf</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Where companies have an official position on PVC this is often quite easy to find. A google search like \"CompanyX PVC\" or \"CompanyX <span>Polyvinyl Chloride</span><span>\" will usually find this kind of document if it exists. </span></p>\r\n<p><span>Searching within a company's CSR report for terms like \"PVC\" and \"Polyvinyl Chloride\" is another way to find out what the company's position is.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>Based on our initial research we found that it is rare for a company to have eliminated PVC from all their products - companies that seem to be leading the way in this area have only managed to eliminate PVC from some of their products (and tend to list the products which are PVC-free).</span></p>\r\n<p><span>So, we have opted for the following range of values for this metric:</span></p>\r\n<p><span><strong>All products</strong> - the company has stated that all of its products are PVC-free</span></p>\r\n<p><span><strong>Some products</strong> - the company has published a list or statement about certain products which are PVC-free, please try to include such a list as a source</span></p>\r\n<p><span><strong>Commitment</strong> - the company has made a commitment to phasing out PVC but has yet to achieve this for any products, in this case please try to make a comment on the metric value which describes the nature of their commitment (e.g. \"PVC free by 2020\")</span></p>\r\n<p><span><strong>No</strong> - the company does not have a policy or goal to eliminate PVC from its products.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "All Products",
        "Some Products",
        "Commitment",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sara_Cifani+Elimination_of_PVC_from_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 397703,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Supply Chain GHG Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Supply_Chain_GHG_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Supply Chain GHG Emissions",
      "question": "What's the company's supply chain GHG emission ranking?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The 18th Edition of the Guide to Greener Electronics was published by Greenpeace in November 2012 with an updated methodology that were meant to reflect progress within the industry since 2006 and to set a new challenge for the industry to become more sustainable across company operations and supply chains. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Greenpeace assesses companies based only on their public information and practice to ensure the ranking is transparent. Companies can be held publicly accountable when they do make commitments. Making changes public also helps drive competition between the companies. The only criterion where nonpublic information is accepted is on advocacy, where a company may have voiced a clear position to relevant decision makers but does not make this public.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/8",
      "range": "0-8",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 16,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Supply_Chain_GHG_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 397811,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Clean Electricity Plan",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Clean_Electricity_Plan.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Clean Electricity Plan",
      "question": "What's the company's clean electricity plan score?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The 18th Edition of the Guide to Greener Electronics was published by Greenpeace in November 2012 with an updated methodology that were meant to reflect progress within the industry since 2006 and to set a new challenge for the industry to become more sustainable across company operations and supply chains. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>\"Greenpeace assesses companies based only on their public information and practice to ensure the ranking is transparent. Companies can be held publicly accountable when they do make commitments. Making changes public also helps drive competition between the companies. The only criterion where nonpublic information is accepted is on advocacy, where a company may have voiced a clear position to relevant decision makers but does not make this public.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>A clean electricity plan evaluates the company’s implementation plan for achieving its green-house gas commitments through energy efficiency and renewable energy investment and deployment. Full points go to companies with proof of a comprehensive clean energy plan, with a goal and strategy to reach 100 percent of their own operations electricity demand through the use of renewable energy.\"</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/8",
      "range": "0-8",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 16,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Clean_Electricity_Plan+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 401056,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Clean Electricity Policy Advocacy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Clean_Electricity_Policy_Advocacy.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Clean Electricity Policy Advocacy",
      "question": "How much does a company score in clean electricity policy advocay?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The 18th Edition of the Guide to Greener Electronics was published by Greenpeace in November 2012 with an updated methodology that were meant to reflect progress within the industry since 2006 and to set a new challenge for the industry to become more sustainable across company operations and supply chains. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Greenpeace assesses companies based only on their public information and practice to ensure the ranking is transparent. Companies can be held publicly accountable when they do make commitments. Making changes public also helps drive competition between the companies. The only criterion where nonpublic information is accepted is on advocacy, where a company may have voiced a clear position to relevant decision makers but does not make this public.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/8",
      "range": "0-8",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 16,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Clean_Electricity_Policy_Advocacy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 401311,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Product Energy Efficiency",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Product_Energy_Efficiency.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Product Energy Efficiency",
      "question": "What's the company's product energy efficiency score?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The 18th Edition of the Guide to Greener Electronics was published by Greenpeace in November 2012 with an updated methodology that were meant to reflect progress within the industry since 2006 and to set a new challenge for the industry to become more sustainable across company operations and supply chains. </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Greenpeace assesses companies based only on their public information and practice to ensure the ranking is transparent. Companies can be held publicly accountable when they do make commitments. Making changes public also helps drive competition between the companies. The only criterion where nonpublic information is accepted is on advocacy, where a company may have voiced a clear position to relevant decision makers but does not make this public.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/5",
      "range": "0-5",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 16,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Product_Energy_Efficiency+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 401321,
      "name": "Sara Cifani+Elimination of BFRs from products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sara_Cifani+Elimination_of_BFRs_from_products.json",
      "designer": "Sara Cifani",
      "title": "Elimination of BFRs from products",
      "question": "Has the company eliminated BFRs from its products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric looks at whether a company has stated that all of its products and components are BFR-free, or whether certain products (but not all) are BFR-free, whether they have plans or commitments to phasing out BFRs but has yet to achieve this for any products, or whether the company does not have a policy or goal to eliminate BFRs from its products.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Where companies have an official position on BFRs this is often quite easy to find. A google search like \"CompanyX BFR\" or \"CompanyX Brominated Flame Retardant\" will usually find this kind of document if it exists.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Searching within a company's CSR report for terms like \"BFRs\" and \"Brominated Flame Retardant\" is another way to find out what the company's position is.<br><br><br><span>We have opted for the following range of values for this metric:</span><br><strong><br>All Products</strong> = <span>the company has stated that all of its products and components are BFR-free</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>Some Products</strong> = <span>the company has published a list or statement about certain products which are BFR-free, please try to include such a list as a source</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>Commitment</strong> = <span>the company has made a commitment to phasing out BFRs but has yet to achieve this for any products, in this case please try to make a comment on the metric value which describes the nature of their commitment (e.g. \"BFR free by 2020\")</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>No</strong> = <span>the company does not have a policy or goal to eliminate BFRs from its products.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "All Products",
        "Some Products",
        "Commitment",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sara_Cifani+Elimination_of_BFRs_from_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 413415,
      "name": "UN Global Compact+UNGC COP Reporting Level",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/UN_Global_Compact+UNGC_COP_Reporting_Level.json",
      "designer": "UN Global Compact",
      "title": "UNGC COP Reporting Level",
      "question": "What level of reporting does a company have according to the UN Global Compact's standards (Learner, Active, Advanced)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Communication on Progress Report (COP) is an annual effort submitted by companies about their efforts to implement the principles of the UN Global Compact. <span>Companies whose COP reports do not meet the UN Global Compact's minimum requirements receive the </span><strong>Beginner</strong><span> level.</span></p>\r\n<p>Companies whose reports meet all of the minimum requirements receive the <strong>Active</strong> level.</p>\r\n<p>Companies that meet the minimum requirements and also cover the company’s implementation of advanced criteria and best practices receive the <strong>Advanced</strong> level.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>https://www.unglobalcompact.org/participation/report/cop</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "GC Learner",
        "GC Active",
        "GC Advanced"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5101,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 1110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+UNGC_Communication_on_Progress_Reporting_Level.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/UN_Global_Compact+UNGC_COP_Reporting_Level+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 413657,
      "name": "United States Environmental Protection Agency+Green Power Usage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/United_States_Environmental_Protection_Agency+Green_Power_Usage.json",
      "designer": "United States Environmental Protection Agency",
      "title": "Green Power Usage",
      "question": "How much Green Power does the company use annually?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>EPA defines green power as electricity produced from solar, wind, geothermal, biogas, eligible biomass, and low-impact small hydroelectric sources. This metric shows the green energy used by companies who are participating in the EPA's Green Power Partnership. This metric only relates to the company's operations in the United States.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 64,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 64,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/United_States_Environmental_Protection_Agency+Green_Power_Usage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 413667,
      "name": "United States Environmental Protection Agency+Green Power %",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/United_States_Environmental_Protection_Agency+Green_Power.json",
      "designer": "United States Environmental Protection Agency",
      "title": "Green Power %",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's power comes from green sources?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>EPA defines green power as electricity produced from solar, wind, geothermal, biogas, eligible biomass, and low-impact small hydroelectric sources. This metric shows the percentage of a company's power usage which comes from green sources - percentages over 100 indicate that the company is a net producer of green power. This metric only relates to the company's operations in the United States.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/United_States_Environmental_Protection_Agency+Green_Power+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 424795,
      "name": "Union of Concerned Scientists+Deforestation-Free Palm Oil",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Union_of_Concerned_Scientists+Deforestation_Free_Palm_Oil.json",
      "designer": "Union of Concerned Scientists",
      "title": "Deforestation-Free Palm Oil",
      "question": "What's the company's UCS total score regarding its commitment to source palm oil that does not contribute to deforestation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Palm oil is a globally traded commodity used in a wide array of common consumer products, from shampoo to cookies. And much of this palm oil is produced in ways that involve the destruction of tropical forests and peatlands, adding to global warming emissions and reducing habitat for many already threatened species.</p>\r\n<p>The good news is that palm oil can be produced without deforestation—and many companies have begun to make public commitments to use deforestation-free palm oil in their products.</p>\r\n<p>The bad news is that too many companies are lagging behind, with weak commitments or none at all. UCS is asking consumers to tell these companies that deforestation is an unacceptable ingredient in their products.</p>\r\n<p>In 2014 UCS released the first edition of our Palm Oil Scorecard. The scorecard evaluated 30 companies that produce major brands across the packaged food, fast food, and personal care product sectors for their commitments to use deforestation-free palm oil.</p>\r\n<p>For 2015 UCS produced a new edition of the scorecard, recalculating each company's score to account for their progress (or lack thereof) during 2014. UCS also added a new sector to the mix, scoring the store brands of 10 retail stores (including supermarket, pharmacy, and discount stores) for the first time. </p>\r\n<p>(Source: [[http://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/stop-deforestation/palm-oil-scorecard-2015|UCS Palm Oil Scorecard 2015: Fries, Face Wash, Forests]])</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies were evaluated based on their commitment to source palm oil that does not contribute to deforestation for a maximum of 20 points awarded as follows:</p>\r\n<p>Full 20 points: A company needs to commit to protecting all forests and include language referring to secondary, disturbed, or high carbon stock forests.</p>\r\n<p>10 points: A company has a vague commitment to forest protection OR commits to protection of HCV or primary forests OR commits to physically sourcing 100% CSPO or sustainable palm oil.<br><br>(Source: [[http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/03/ucs-palm-oil-methodology-2015_0.pdf|UCS Palm Oil Scorecard Methodology]])</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "0",
        "10",
        "20"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-20",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 60,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 40,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Union_of_Concerned_Scientists+Deforestation_Free_Palm_Oil+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 424802,
      "name": "Union of Concerned Scientists+Peat-free Palm Oil",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Union_of_Concerned_Scientists+Peat_free_Palm_Oil.json",
      "designer": "Union of Concerned Scientists",
      "title": "Peat-free Palm Oil",
      "question": "What's the company's UCS total score regarding its commitment to source palm oil that does not contribute to peatland destruction?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Palm oil is a globally traded commodity used in a wide array of common consumer products, from shampoo to cookies. And much of this palm oil is produced in ways that involve the destruction of tropical forests and peatlands, adding to global warming emissions and reducing habitat for many already threatened species.</p>\r\n<p><span>The good news is that palm oil can be produced without deforestation—and many companies have begun to make public commitments to use deforestation-free palm oil in their products.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>The bad news is that too many companies are lagging behind, with weak commitments or none at all. UCS is asking consumers to tell these companies that deforestation is an unacceptable ingredient in their products.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>In 2014 UCS released the first edition of our Palm Oil Scorecard. The scorecard evaluated 30 companies that produce major brands across the packaged food, fast food, and personal care product sectors for their commitments to use deforestation-free palm oil.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>For 2015 UCS produced a new edition of the scorecard, recalculating each company's score to account for their progress (or lack thereof) during 2014. UCS also added a new sector to the mix, scoring the store brands of 10 retail stores (including supermarket, pharmacy, and discount stores) for the first time. </span></p>\r\n<p><span>(Source: [[http://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/stop-deforestation/palm-oil-scorecard-2015|UCS Palm Oil Scorecard 2015: Fries, Face Wash, Forests]])</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>Companies were evaluated based on their commitment </span>to source palm oil that does not contribute to peatland destruction <span> </span><span>for a maximum of 20 points awarded as follows:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Full 20 points: A company needsto commit to purchase palm </span><span>oil that does not come from new conversion of peatlands and </span><span>if sourcing from existing plantations on peat, ensure that </span><span>those plantations use best management practices (BMPs) that </span><span>are at least as strong as those of the RSPO. The BMPs </span><span>requirement can be fulfilled by committing to physically </span><span>source 100% CSPO or sustainable palm oil.</span></li>\r\n<li><span>15 points: A company has a vague commitment to peatland protection OR it only commits to not sourcing from new conversion.</span></li>\r\n<li><span>5 points: A company commits to physically source 100% CSPO or sustainable palm oil.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span>(Source: [[http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/03/ucs-palm-oil-methodology-2015_0.pdf|UCS Palm Oil Scorecard Methodology]])</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/20",
      "range": "0-20",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 60,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 40,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Union_of_Concerned_Scientists+Peat_free_Palm_Oil+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 427702,
      "name": "Union of Concerned Scientists+Palm Oil Transparency",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Union_of_Concerned_Scientists+Palm_Oil_Transparency.json",
      "designer": "Union of Concerned Scientists",
      "title": "Palm Oil Transparency",
      "question": "What's the company's UCS total score regarding its commitment to transparent annual reporting, time-bound goals to physically source palm oil &amp; its layout a process of verification?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Palm oil is a globally traded commodity used in a wide array of common consumer products, from shampoo to cookies. And much of this palm oil is produced in ways that involve the destruction of tropical forests and peatlands, adding to global warming emissions and reducing habitat for many already threatened species.</p>\r\n<p>The good news is that palm oil can be produced without deforestation—and many companies have begun to make public commitments to use deforestation-free palm oil in their products.</p>\r\n<p>The bad news is that too many companies are lagging behind, with weak commitments or none at all. UCS is asking consumers to tell these companies that deforestation is an unacceptable ingredient in their products.</p>\r\n<p>In 2014 UCS released the first edition of our Palm Oil Scorecard. The scorecard evaluated 30 companies that produce major brands across the packaged food, fast food, and personal care product sectors for their commitments to use deforestation-free palm oil.</p>\r\n<p>For 2015 UCS produced a new edition of the scorecard, recalculating each company's score to account for their progress (or lack thereof) during 2014. UCS also added a new sector to the mix, scoring the store brands of 10 retail stores (including supermarket, pharmacy, and discount stores) for the first time. </p>\r\n<p>(Source: [[http://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/stop-deforestation/palm-oil-scorecard-2015|UCS Palm Oil Scorecard 2015: Fries, Face Wash, Forests]])</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>Companies were scored, for a maximum of 20 points, based on the following criteria:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Annual Reporting of Progress</strong><br><em>Full 10 points:</em> A company must be reporting its progress; including disclosure of the percentage (or volume) of palm oil that meets deforestation-free, peat-free criteria, is CSPO, or is sustainable. This can be satisfied by joining the RSPO and reporting through the ACOP <br><span><em>5 points:</em> A company has made a vague commitment to </span><span>reporting.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Time-bound goals to physically source palm oil <br></strong><span><em>Full 5 points:</em> A company has a time-bound plan with </span><span>intermediate goals to physically source deforestation-free, </span><span>peat-free palm oil OR a company does not have  intermediate </span><span>goals, but commits to physically source deforestation-free, </span><span>peat-free palm oil by 2015.<br><em>3 points:</em> A company has a time-bound plan WITHOUT intermediate goals to physically source deforestation-free, peat-free palm oil by a date after 2015 OR has a time-bound plan WITH intermediate goals to physically source 100% CSPO or sustainable palm oil OR has a time-bound plan WITHOUT intermediate goals if commits to physically source 100% CSPO or sustainable palm oil by 2015.<br><em>1 point:</em> A company has a time-bound plan WITHOUT intermediate goals to physically source 100% CSPO or sustainable palm oil by a date after 2015.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Layout a process of verification</strong><span> <br></span><em>Full 5 points:</em><span> A company outlines how it will work with suppliers to ensure it and its suppliers are meeting all principles in its palm oil commitment.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span>(Source: [[http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/03/ucs-palm-oil-methodology-2015_0.pdf|UCS Palm Oil Scorecard Methodology]])</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/20",
      "range": "0-20",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 60,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 40,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Union_of_Concerned_Scientists+Palm_Oil_Transparency+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 427709,
      "name": "Union of Concerned Scientists+Palm Oil Traceability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Union_of_Concerned_Scientists+Palm_Oil_Traceability.json",
      "designer": "Union of Concerned Scientists",
      "title": "Palm Oil Traceability",
      "question": "What's the company's UCS Palm Oil Traceability total score?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Palm oil is a globally traded commodity used in a wide array of common consumer products, from shampoo to cookies. And much of this palm oil is produced in ways that involve the destruction of tropical forests and peatlands, adding to global warming emissions and reducing habitat for many already threatened species.</p>\r\n<p>The good news is that palm oil can be produced without deforestation—and many companies have begun to make public commitments to use deforestation-free palm oil in their products.</p>\r\n<p>The bad news is that too many companies are lagging behind, with weak commitments or none at all. UCS is asking consumers to tell these companies that deforestation is an unacceptable ingredient in their products.</p>\r\n<p>In 2014 UCS released the first edition of our Palm Oil Scorecard. The scorecard evaluated 30 companies that produce major brands across the packaged food, fast food, and personal care product sectors for their commitments to use deforestation-free palm oil.</p>\r\n<p>For 2015 UCS produced a new edition of the scorecard, recalculating each company's score to account for their progress (or lack thereof) during 2014. UCS also added a new sector to the mix, scoring the store brands of 10 retail stores (including supermarket, pharmacy, and discount stores) for the first time. </p>\r\n<p>(Source: [[http://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/stop-deforestation/palm-oil-scorecard-2015|UCS Palm Oil Scorecard 2015: Fries, Face Wash, Forests]])</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>Companies were evaluated based on two criteria: their commitment to tracing palm oil and their c</span>ommitment to ask suppliers about the GHG footprint of their production; companies were scored as follows:</p>\r\n<p>First Criterion:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Full 15 points: A company must commit to trace its palm oil to the plantation level or that the supply chain is traced to the plantation level in conjunction with a supplier whose tracing can be verified.</li>\r\n<li>10 points: A company has a vague commitment to traceability.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Second Criterion:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Full 5 points: A company answers “yes” to question 2.5 or 5.2 on the 2013-2014 RSPO ACOP OR this information is included in other policies. </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span>(Source: [[http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/03/ucs-palm-oil-methodology-2015_0.pdf|UCS Palm Oil Scorecard Methodology]])</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/20",
      "range": "0-20",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 63,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 40,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Union_of_Concerned_Scientists+Palm_Oil_Traceability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 427716,
      "name": "Union of Concerned Scientists+Palm Oil Sourcing Policies",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Union_of_Concerned_Scientists+Palm_Oil_Sourcing_Policies.json",
      "designer": "Union of Concerned Scientists",
      "title": "Palm Oil Sourcing Policies",
      "question": "What's the company's UCS total score regarding its commitment to responsible sourcing policies?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Palm oil is a globally traded commodity used in a wide array of common consumer products, from shampoo to cookies. And much of this palm oil is produced in ways that involve the destruction of tropical forests and peatlands, adding to global warming emissions and reducing habitat for many already threatened species.</p>\r\n<p><span>The good news is that palm oil can be produced without deforestation—and many companies have begun to make public commitments to use deforestation-free palm oil in their products.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>The bad news is that too many companies are lagging behind, with weak commitments or none at all. UCS is asking consumers to tell these companies that deforestation is an unacceptable ingredient in their products.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>In 2014 UCS released the first edition of our Palm Oil Scorecard. The scorecard evaluated 30 companies that produce major brands across the packaged food, fast food, and personal care product sectors for their commitments to use deforestation-free palm oil.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>For 2015 UCS produced a new edition of the scorecard, recalculating each company's score to account for their progress (or lack thereof) during 2014. UCS also added a new sector to the mix, scoring the store brands of 10 retail stores (including supermarket, pharmacy, and discount stores) for the first time. </span></p>\r\n<p><span>(Source: [[http://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/stop-deforestation/palm-oil-scorecard-2015|UCS Palm Oil Scorecard 2015: Fries, Face Wash, Forests]])</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Current sourcing scores were determined by an averaged percentage of palm fruit oil, palm kernel oil, and palm oil derivatives a company is currently buying which is either:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>deforestation- and peat-free;</span></li>\r\n<li><span>CSPO or sustainable palm oil.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Different forms of palm oil were given different weight:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Deforestation- and peat-free palm oil was given full weight.</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Physically sourced CSPO or sustainable palm fruit oil, CSPO or </span><span>sustainable palm kernel oil (physical or GreenPalm), and CSPO or </span><span>sustainable palm derivatives (physical or GreenPalm) were weighted </span><span>at 0.5.</span></li>\r\n<li><span>CSPO palm fruit oil sourced through GreenPalm (PFOGP) was given a </span><span>weighting of 0.25.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>The following equation was used to determine each companies score for this criterion:</p>\r\n<p>{{UCS equation|size:large}}<br><br>{{UCS legend|size:large}}</p>\r\n<p>(Source: [[http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/03/ucs-palm-oil-methodology-2015_0.pdf|UCS Palmoil Scorecard Methodology]])</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/20",
      "range": "0-20",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 61,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 40,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Union_of_Concerned_Scientists+Palm_Oil_Sourcing_Policies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 427723,
      "name": "Union of Concerned Scientists+Palm Oil Total Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Union_of_Concerned_Scientists+Palm_Oil_Total_Score.json",
      "designer": "Union of Concerned Scientists",
      "title": "Palm Oil Total Score",
      "question": "What's the company's total score regarding the UCS indicators of Sourcing Policies, Traceability, Transparency, Impact on Deforestation, Impact on Peat Land?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Palm oil is a globally traded commodity used in a wide array of common consumer products, from shampoo to cookies. And much of this palm oil is produced in ways that involve the destruction of tropical forests and peatlands, adding to global warming emissions and reducing habitat for many already threatened species.</p>\r\n<p><span>The good news is that palm oil can be produced without deforestation—and many companies have begun to make public commitments to use deforestation-free palm oil in their products.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>The bad news is that too many companies are lagging behind, with weak commitments or none at all. UCS is asking consumers to tell these companies that deforestation is an unacceptable ingredient in their products.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>In 2014 UCS released the first edition of our Palm Oil Scorecard. The scorecard evaluated 30 companies that produce major brands across the packaged food, fast food, and personal care product sectors for their commitments to use deforestation-free palm oil.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>For 2015 UCS produced a new edition of the scorecard, recalculating each company's score to account for their progress (or lack thereof) during 2014. UCS also added a new sector to the mix, scoring the store brands of 10 retail stores (including supermarket, pharmacy, and discount stores) for the first time. </span></p>\r\n<p><span>(Source: [[http://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/stop-deforestation/palm-oil-scorecard-2015|UCS Palm Oil Scorecard 2015: Fries, Face Wash, Forests]])</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Scoring was based on commitments from official company sources, which were publically available as of January 16, 2015. These included pages on each company’s website, press releases, annual sustainability and other corporate reports, company policy documents, and companies’ most recent Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP) to the [[Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)]].</p>\r\n<p>One or more representatives from each company were contacted to let them know they would be appearing in our scorecard. Although we did our own independent research to uncover all relevant materials from a company’s website and reporting to the RSPO, this was done to allow companies the opportunity to weigh in in the unlikely event that an important document was overlooked. <br><br>This metric represent the sum of the scores obtained by companies in the following indicators:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>[[Union_of_Concerned_Scientists+Palm_Oil_Sourcing_Policies|Sourcing Policies]]</li>\r\n<li>[[Union_of_Concerned_Scientists+Palm_Oil_Traceability|Traceability]]</li>\r\n<li>[[Union_of_Concerned_Scientist+Palm_Oil_Transparency|Transparency]]</li>\r\n<li>[[Union_of_Concerned_Scientists+Deforestation_Free_Palm_Oil|Impact on Deforestation]]</li>\r\n<li>[[Union_of_Concerned_Scientists+_Peat_free_Palm_Oil|Impact on Peat Land]]</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>(Source: [[http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/03/ucs-palm-oil-methodology-2015_0.pdf|UCS Palmoil Scorecard Methodology]]) </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/100",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 75,
      "bookmarkers": 7,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 40,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Union_of_Concerned_Scientists+Palm_Oil_Total_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 443112,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Hazardous substances in products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Hazardous_substances_in_products.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Hazardous substances in products",
      "question": "What's the company's hazardous substances in products score?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The 18th Edition of the Guide to Greener Electronics was published by Greenpeace in November 2012 with an updated methodology that were meant to reflect progress within the industry since 2006 and to set a new challenge for the industry to become more sustainable across company operations and supply chains. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Greenpeace assesses companies based only on their public information and practice to ensure the ranking is transparent. Companies can be held publicly accountable when they do make commitments. Making changes public also helps drive competition between the companies. The only criterion where nonpublic information is accepted is on advocacy, where a company may have voiced a clear position to relevant decision makers but does not make this public.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/4",
      "range": "0-4",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 16,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Hazardous_substances_in_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 443344,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Recycled Plastic in Products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Recycled_Plastic_in_Products.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Recycled Plastic in Products",
      "question": "What's the company's recycled plastic in products score?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The 18th Edition of the Guide to Greener Electronics was published by Greenpeace in November 2012 with an updated methodology that were meant to reflect progress within the industry since 2006 and to set a new challenge for the industry to become more sustainable across company operations and supply chains. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Greenpeace assesses companies based only on their public information and practice to ensure the ranking is transparent. Companies can be held publicly accountable when they do make commitments. Making changes public also helps drive competition between the companies. The only criterion where nonpublic information is accepted is on advocacy, where a company may have voiced a clear position to relevant decision makers but does not make this public.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-5",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 16,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Recycled_Plastic_in_Products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 443495,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Product Life Cycle",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Product_Life_Cycle.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Product Life Cycle",
      "question": "What's the company's product life cycle score?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The 18th Edition of the Guide to Greener Electronics was published by Greenpeace in November 2012 with an updated methodology that were meant to reflect progress within the industry since 2006 and to set a new challenge for the industry to become more sustainable across company operations and supply chains. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Greenpeace assesses companies based only on their public information and practice to ensure the ranking is transparent. Companies can be held publicly accountable when they do make commitments. Making changes public also helps drive competition between the companies. The only criterion where nonpublic information is accepted is on advocacy, where a company may have voiced a clear position to relevant decision makers but does not make this public.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/8",
      "range": "0-8",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 16,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Product_Life_Cycle+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 443646,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Chemical Management and Advocacy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Chemical_Management_and_Advocacy.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Chemical Management and Advocacy",
      "question": "How much does the company score in terms of chemical management &amp; advocacy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The 18th Edition of the Guide to Greener Electronics was published by Greenpeace in November 2012 with an updated methodology that were meant to reflect progress within the industry since 2006 and to set a new challenge for the industry to become more sustainable across company operations and supply chains. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Greenpeace assesses companies based only on their public information and practice to ensure the ranking is transparent. Companies can be held publicly accountable when they do make commitments. Making changes public also helps drive competition between the companies. The only criterion where nonpublic information is accepted is on advocacy, where a company may have voiced a clear position to relevant decision makers but does not make this public.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/5",
      "range": "0-5",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 16,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Chemical_Management_and_Advocacy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 443751,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Sustainable Sourcing of Fibers for Paper",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Sustainable_Sourcing_of_Fibers_for_Paper.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Sustainable Sourcing of Fibers for Paper",
      "question": "What's the company's score if they report on sustainable sourcing of fibers for paper?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>The 18th Edition of the Guide to Greener Electronics was published by Greenpeace in November 2012 with an updated methodology that were meant to reflect progress within the industry since 2006 and to set a new challenge for the industry to become more sustainable across company operations and supply chains. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>Greenpeace assesses companies based only on their public information and practice to ensure the ranking is transparent. Companies can be held publicly accountable when they do make commitments. Making changes public also helps drive competition between the companies. The only criterion where nonpublic information is accepted is on advocacy, where a company may have voiced a clear position to relevant decision makers but does not make this public.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/3",
      "range": "0-3",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 16,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Sustainable_Sourcing_of_Fibers_for_Paper+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 443769,
      "name": "Greenpeace+Voluntary Take-Backs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Voluntary_Take_Backs.json",
      "designer": "Greenpeace",
      "title": "Voluntary Take-Backs",
      "question": "What's the company's voluntary take-back score?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The 18th Edition of the Guide to Greener Electronics was published by Greenpeace in November 2012 with an updated methodology that were meant to reflect progress within the industry since 2006 and to set a new challenge for the industry to become more sustainable across company operations and supply chains. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Greenpeace assesses companies based only on their public information and practice to ensure the ranking is transparent. Companies can be held publicly accountable when they do make commitments. Making changes public also helps drive competition between the companies. The only criterion where nonpublic information is accepted is on advocacy, where a company may have voiced a clear position to relevant decision makers but does not make this public.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "/8",
      "range": "0-8",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 16,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Greenpeace+Voluntary_Take_Backs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 538693,
      "name": "2020WoB+Women on Board",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/2020WoB+Women_on_Board.json",
      "designer": "2020WoB",
      "title": "Women on Board",
      "question": "What percentage of people on the company's board of directors are women?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>2020 Women on Boards conducts research studies about the gender composition of the boards of directors of companies.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To search for a company listed on the 2020 Women on Boards directory, check the database here: <a href=\"https://www.2020wob.com/company-directory\">https://www.2020wob.com/company-directory</a>. See also data in the 2014 report <a href=\"http://www.2020wob.com/sites/default/files/2020GDI-2014Report.pdf\">here</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Data Breach Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3569,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 1905,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Women_on_Board.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Women_on_Board.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/2020WoB+Women_on_Board+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 538705,
      "name": "EU Transparency Register+EU lobbying spend",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/EU_Transparency_Register+EU_lobbying_spend.json",
      "designer": "EU Transparency Register",
      "title": "EU lobbying spend",
      "question": "Estimate of the annual costs related to activities covered by the EU Transparency register.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Citizens can, and indeed should, expect the EU decision-making process to be as transparent and open as possible. The more open the process is, the easier it is to ensure balanced representation and avoid undue pressure and illegitimate or privileged access to information or to decision-makers. Transparency is also a key part of encouraging European citizens to participate more actively in the democratic life of the EU.</p>\r\n<p>The transparency register has been set up to answer core questions such as what interests are being pursued, by whom and with what budgets. The system is operated jointly by the European Parliament and the European Commission.</p>\r\n<p>This metric asks companies to estimate how much they spend per year on activities covered by the transparency register (like lobbying).</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/EU_Transparency_Register+EU_lobbying_spend+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 538717,
      "name": "EU Transparency Register+Employees engaged in lobbying",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/EU_Transparency_Register+Employees_engaged_in_lobbying.json",
      "designer": "EU Transparency Register",
      "title": "Employees engaged in lobbying",
      "question": "Number of persons involved in activities covered by the EU transparency register\r\n ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Citizens can, and indeed should, expect the EU decision-making process to be as transparent and open as possible. The more open the process is, the easier it is to ensure balanced representation and avoid undue pressure and illegitimate or privileged access to information or to decision-makers. Transparency is also a key part of encouraging European citizens to participate more actively in the democratic life of the EU.</p>\r\n<p>The transparency register has been set up to answer core questions such as what interests are being pursued, by whom and with what budgets. The system is operated jointly by the European Parliament and the European Commission.</p>\r\n<p>This metric asks companies to declare the number of persons involved in activities (like lobbying) covered by the EU transparency register.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "people",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 884,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 871,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/EU_Transparency_Register+Employees_engaged_in_lobbying+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 538731,
      "name": "RSPO+RSPO Membership",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/RSPO+RSPO_Membership.json",
      "designer": "RSPO",
      "title": "RSPO Membership",
      "question": "Is the company a member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": "",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 15,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 15,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/RSPO+RSPO_Membership+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 543736,
      "name": "Michael Leben+FairWear",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Michael_Leben+FairWear.json",
      "designer": "Michael Leben",
      "title": "FairWear",
      "question": "Is the company a member of the FairWear Foundation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwear Foundation is an NGO that certifies and monitors garment manufacturers. It promotes the ILO norms along the entire supply chain.</p>\r\n<p>http://www.fairwear.de/</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Verification based on factory audits and paper work.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Is the company a member if the FairWear Association?",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Michael_Leben+FairWear+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 564281,
      "name": "Ranking Digital Rights+RDR Total Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Ranking_Digital_Rights+RDR_Total_Score.json",
      "designer": "Ranking Digital Rights",
      "title": "RDR Total Score",
      "question": "What was the total score the company received in Ranking Digital Rights' Corporate Accountability Index?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The 2019 Ranking Digital Rights Corporate Accountability Index evaluated 24 of the world's most powerful internet, mobile and telecommunications companies on their disclosed commitments and policies affecting freedom of expression and privacy of internet users across the world. </p>\r\n<p>Now in its fourth iteration, the RDR Index has continued to expand each year. Beginning in 2015, RDR evaluated 16 internet and telecommunications companies using 31 indicators. Then in 2017, RDR evaluated 22 telecommunications, mobile and internet companies using a revised methodology made up of 35 indicators. Now the fourth edition of the RDR Index has grown to include two more companies, for a total of 24, and RDR is planning to once again revise its methodology and add companies for the next edition of the ranking, scheduled for 2021. </p>\r\n<p> As a note: with the revision of Ranking Digital Rights' methodology in 2017, the 2015 scores are not easily comparable to the second, third and fourth rankings.</p>\r\n<p>Companies' total score consists of the accumulated scores they received across all indicators in the categories 'Goverance', 'Freedom of Expression' and 'Privacy'<br><br>For most recent full results, methodology and background, see <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/\">https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Check how the company ranked overall in this [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/| report]]</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Accountability Index",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+AI Ethics & Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 123,
      "bookmarkers": 11,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 26,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+RDR_Total_Score_10.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Ranking_Digital_Rights+RDR_Total_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 564393,
      "name": "Ranking Digital Rights+Governance Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Ranking_Digital_Rights+Governance_Score.json",
      "designer": "Ranking Digital Rights",
      "title": "Governance Score",
      "question": "What score did Ranking Digital Rights award for public commitments and disclosed policies affecting users’ freedom of expression and privacy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The 2019 Ranking Digital Rights Corporate Accountability Index evaluated 24 of the world's most powerful internet, mobile and telecommunications companies on their disclosed commitments and policies affecting freedom of expression and privacy of internet users across the world.</p>\r\n<p>Now in its fourth iteration, the RDR Index has continued to expand each year. Beginning in 2015, RDR evaluated 16 internet and telecommunications companies using 31 indicators. Then in 2017, RDR evaluated 22 telecommunications, internet and mobile companies using a revised methodology made up of 35 indicators. Now the fourth edition of the RDR Index has grown to include two more companies, for a total of 24, and RDR is planning to once again revise its methodology and add companies for the next edition of the ranking, scheduled for 2021. </p>\r\n<p>As a note: with the revision of Ranking Digital Rights' methodology in 2017, the 2015 scores are not easily comparable to the second, third, and fourth rankings. Additionally, in 2017, this category was renamed \"Governance,\" whereas in 2015, it was known as, \"Commitment.\"<br><br>The Governance category of the Index evaluates whether companies demonstrate that they have governance processes in place to ensure that they respect the human rights to freedom of expression and privacy. Both rights are part of the <a href=\"http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights\">Universal Declaration of Human Rights</a> and are enshrined in the <a href=\"http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx\">International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights</a>. They apply online as well as offline. In order for a company to perform well in this section, the company’s disclosure should at least follow, and ideally surpass, the <a href=\"http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf\">UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights</a> and other industry-specific human rights standards focused on freedom of expression and privacy such as the <a href=\"https://globalnetworkinitiative.org/principles/index.php\">Global Network Initiative Principles.</a><br><br>For a list of 2015 indicators in the Commitment category and their results, see <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2015/categories/commitment\">https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2015/categories/commitment</a></p>\r\n<p>For a list of 2017 indicators in the Governance category and their results, see <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2017/categories/governance\" title=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2017/categories/governance\">https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2017/categories/governance</a></p>\r\n<p>For a list of 2018 indicators in the Governance category and their results, see <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2018/categories/governance/\">https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2018/categories/governance/</a></p>\r\n<p>For a list of 2019 indicators in the Governance category and their results, see <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/categories/governance/\">https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/categories/governance/</a></p>\r\n<p>For full results, methodology and background, see <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/\">https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/</a>.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For a list of indicators in the Governance category and their results, check how the company ranked in this [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/categories/governance/| report]]</p>\r\n<p>For full results, methodology and background, see this [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019| page]]</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Accountability Index",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 123,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 26,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Governance_Score_10.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Ranking_Digital_Rights+Governance_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 564496,
      "name": "Ranking Digital Rights+Freedom of Expression",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Ranking_Digital_Rights+Freedom_of_Expression.json",
      "designer": "Ranking Digital Rights",
      "title": "Freedom of Expression",
      "question": "What score did Ranking Digital Rights award for Freedom of Expression?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The 2019 Ranking Digital Rights Corporate Accountability Index evaluated 24 of the world's most powerful internet, mobile and telecommunications companies on their disclosed commitments and policies affecting freedom of expression and privacy of internet users across the world. </p>\r\n<p>Now in its fourth iteration, the RDR Index has continued to expand each year. Beginning in 2015, RDR evaluated 16 internet and telecommunications companies using 31 indicators. Then in 2017, RDR evalutated 22 telecommunications, internet and mobile companies using a revised methodology made up of 35 indicators. Now the fourth edition of the RDR Index has grown to include two more companies, for a total of 24, and RDR is looking to once again revise its methodology and add companies for the next edition of the ranking, scheduled for 2021. </p>\r\n<p>As a note: with the revision of Ranking Digital Rights' methodology in 2017, the 2015 scores are not easily comparable to the second, third and fourth rankings. <br><br>The Freedom of Expression category contains 11 indicators that measure corporate disclosure of policies affecting users' freedom of expression. Indicators in this category evaluate whether tha company demonstrates concrete ways in which it respects users' right to freedom of expression, as articulated in the <a href=\"http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights\">Universal Declaration of Human Rights</a>, the <a href=\"http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx\">International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights</a>, and other international human rights instruments. A company's disclosed policies should demonstrate how it works to avoid contributing to actions that may interfere with this right, except where such actions are lawful, proportionate, and for a justifiable purpose. Companies that perform well in this category demonstrate a strong public commitment to transparency, not only in terms of how they comply with laws and regulations or respond to government demands, but also how they determine, communicate and enforce private rules and commercial practices that affect users' freedom of expression.   </p>\r\n<p>For a list of indicators in the Freedom of Expression category and their results in 2015, see <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2015/categories/freedom-of-expression/\">https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2015/categories/freedom-of-expression/</a></p>\r\n<p>For a list of indicators in the Freedom of Expression category and their results in 2017, see <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2017/categories/freedom-of-expression/\">https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2017/categories/freedom-of-expression/</a></p>\r\n<p>For a list of indicators in the Freedom of Expression category and their results in 2018, see <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2018/categories/freedom-of-expression/\">https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2018/categories/freedom-of-expression/</a></p>\r\n<p>For a list of indicators in the Freedom of Expression category and their results in 2019, see <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/categories/freedom-of-expression/\">https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/categories/freedom-of-expression/</a></p>\r\n<p>For most recent full results, methodology and background, see <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2015\">https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2017</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For a list of indicators in the Freedom of Expression category and their results, check how the company ranked in this [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/categories/freedom-of-expression| report]]</p>\r\n<p>For full results, methodology and background, see this [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019| page]]</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Accountability Index",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+AI Ethics & Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 123,
      "bookmarkers": 6,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 26,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Freedom_of_Expression_10.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Ranking_Digital_Rights+Freedom_of_Expression+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 564597,
      "name": "Ranking Digital Rights+Privacy Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Ranking_Digital_Rights+Privacy_Score.json",
      "designer": "Ranking Digital Rights",
      "title": "Privacy Score",
      "question": "What score did Ranking Digital Rights award for Privacy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The 2019 Ranking Digital Rights Corporate Accountability Index evaluated 24 of the world's most powerful internet, mobile and telecommunications companies on their disclosed commitments and policies affecting freedom of expression and privacy of internet users across the world.</p>\r\n<p>Now in its fourth iteration, the RDR Index has continued to expand each year. Beginning in 2015, RDR evaluated 16 internet and telecommunications companies using 31 indicators. Then in 2017, RDR evaluated 22 telecommunications, mobile and internet companies using a revised methodology made up of 35 indicators. Now the fourth edition of the RDR Index has grown to include two more companies, for a total of 24, and RDR is planning to once again revise its methodology and add companies for the next edition of the ranking, scheduled for 2021. </p>\r\n<p>As a note: with the revision of Ranking Digitial Rights' methodology in 2017, the 2015 scores are not easily comparable to the second, third and fourth rankings. </p>\r\n<p>The Privacy category contains 18 indicators that measure corporate commitments and disclosure of policies affecting users' privacy. Indicators in this category evaluate whether the company's policies and commitments demonstrate concrete ways in which it respects the right to privacy of users, as articulated in the <a href=\"https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/\">Universal Declaration of Human Rights</a>, the<a href=\"https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx\"> International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights</a>, and other international human rights instruments. The company's disclosed policies should demonstrate how it works to avoid contributing to actions that may interfere with users' privacy, except where such actions are lawful, proportionate, and for a justifiable purpose. They must also demonstrate a strong commitment to protect and defend users' digital security. Companies that perform well on these indicators demonstrate a strong public commitment to transparency not only in terms of how they respond to government and private requests for user information, but also how they determine, communicate, and enforce private rules and commercial practices that affect users' privacy.</p>\r\n<p>For a list of 2015 indicators in the Privacy category and their results see <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2015/categories/privacy/\">https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2015/categories/privacy/</a></p>\r\n<p>For a list of 2017 indicators in the Privacy category and their results see <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2017/categories/privacy/\">https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2017/categories/privacy/</a></p>\r\n<p>For a list of 2018 indicators in the Privacy category and their results see <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2018/categories/privacy/\">https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2018/categories/privacy/</a></p>\r\n<p>For a list of 2019 indicators in the Privacy category and their results see <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/categories/privacy/\">https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/categories/privacy/</a></p>\r\n<p>For full results, methodology and background, see <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/\">https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/</a></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For a list of indicators in the Privacy category and their results, check how the company ranked in this [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/categories/privacy/| report]]</p>\r\n<p>For full results, methodology and background, see this [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019| page]]</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Accountability Index",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 123,
      "bookmarkers": 10,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 26,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Privacy_Score_10.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Ranking_Digital_Rights+Privacy_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 565926,
      "name": "PayScale+CEO to Worker pay",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/PayScale+CEO_to_Worker_pay.json",
      "designer": "PayScale",
      "title": "CEO to Worker pay",
      "question": "What is the ratio between a company CEO's pay and the median employee income?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by PayScale and their analysis can be found [[http://www.payscale.com/data-packages/ceo-income/full-list | here]].</p>\r\n<p><span>Data on CEO Salary was obtained from Equilar’s “100 CEO Pay Study,” an annual study of CEOs at the 100 largest U.S. publicly-traded companies. We summed Salary, Bonus, and Other compensation to get non-stock compensation. This measure is most similar to employee data from the PayScale website.</span><br><br><span>We provide the overall typical median pay for workers at 100 companies, as well as the ratio of CEO-to-worker pay.</span><br><br><span>We also provide the percentage of respondents that report high job satisfaction and meaning, low stress, and would recommend their job.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>Definitions:</span><br><br><span>Total Cash Compensation (TCC):</span><span> TCC combines base annual salary or hourly wage, bonuses, profit sharing, tips, commissions, and other forms of cash earnings as applicable.  It does not include equity (stock) compensation, cash value of retirement benefits, or the value of other non-cash benefits (e.g. healthcare).</span><br><br><span>Typical Median Pay:</span><span> The median pay is the national median (50th Percentile) annual total cash compensation.  Half of the people doing the job earn more than the median, while half earn less.</span><br><br><span>Range in pay within a job can be very wide depending upon years of experience, scope of responsibility, location of work, etc.  For example, pay can be higher than the stated median pay if the worker has more responsibility, chooses a higher paying field, or works in a city like New York.</span><br><br><span>Percentage of High Job Satisfaction</span><span>:</span><span> </span><span>The percentage of respondents who chose the two most extreme options for satisfaction: </span><em>Fairly Satisfied </em><span>and </span><em>Extremely Satisfied </em><span>for the question, \"How satisfied are you in your job?\"</span><br><br><span>Percentage of Low Job Stress</span><span>:</span><span> </span><span>The percentage of respondents who chose the three least extreme options for stress: </span><em>My Job is Relaxing, Not stressful, </em><span>and</span><em> A Little Stressful, </em><span>for the question, \"ow stressful is your job/work environment?\"</span><br><br><span>Percentage of High Job Meaning: </span><span>The percentage of respondents who chose the two most extreme options for job meaning: </span><em>Yes</em><span> and </span><em>Very Much So, </em><span>for the question, \"Does your work make the world a better place?\"</span><br><br><span>Percentage of Would Recommend Job:</span><span> The percentage of respondents who chose the two most extreme options for job recommendation: </span><em>Yes, strongly</em><span> and </span><em>Yes, moderately, </em><span>for the question, \"Do you recommend your current job?\"</span><br><span>Only data that was statistically significant was included for these questions.</span><br><br><span>Company Annual Revenue (in billions)</span><span>:  </span><br><span>As determined by </span><a href=\"http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2013/full_list/\" target=\"_blank\">CNN Money's Fortune 500 list for 2013</a><br><span>For three companies, the company annual revenue was located elsewhere:</span><br><span>- </span><a href=\"http://quotes.morningstar.com/stock/ABBV/s?t=ABBV&amp;region=USA\" target=\"_blank\">AbbVie</a><span> (ABBV)</span><br><span>- </span><a href=\"http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/IROL/97/97513/2013AR/HTML/index.html\" target=\"_blank\">Schlumberger</a><span> (SLB)</span><br><em>- </em><a href=\"http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/foxa/financials\" target=\"_blank\">Twenty-First Century Fox</a><span> (FOXA)</span><br><br><span>CEO-to-Worker Ratio</span><span>: The ratio of a typical worker's pay compared to a company's CEO pay.</span><br><br><span>Percentage Above or Below Market</span><span>: This measures whether a given employer typically pays above, below or at market price for their employees. By utilizing PayScale’s database of over 40 million employee profiles, we have determined how various compensable factors, like work experience, education, and job responsibilities, affect pay, when all else is held equal. From this analysis, PayScale can then calculate what a worker with a given set of compensable factors will earn across different employers.</span><br><br><span>This measure is reported as a percentage premium or loss. Any employer that pays above market will have a positive percentage. The larger the percentage, the higher the premium these employers pay for their workers. On the other hand, if an employer pays below market, the percentage will be negative.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": ":1",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 97,
      "bookmarkers": 23,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 96,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/PayScale+CEO_to_Worker_pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 566682,
      "name": "PayScale+Median Worker Pay",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/PayScale+Median_Worker_Pay.json",
      "designer": "PayScale",
      "title": "Median Worker Pay",
      "question": "How much is the typical worker at this company paid? (median)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>http://www.payscale.com/data-packages/ceo-income/full-list</span></p>\r\n<p><span>Typical Median Pay:</span><span> The median pay is the national median (50th Percentile) annual total cash compensation.  Half of the people doing the job earn more than the median, while half earn less.</span><br><br><span>Range in pay within a job can be very wide depending upon years of experience, scope of responsibility, location of work, etc.  For example, pay can be higher than the stated median pay if the worker has more responsibility, chooses a higher paying field, or works in a city like New York.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>http://www.payscale.com/data-packages/ceo-income/methodology</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 94,
      "bookmarkers": 8,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 94,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/PayScale+Median_Worker_Pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 576365,
      "name": "PayScale+CEO pay",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/PayScale+CEO_pay.json",
      "designer": "PayScale",
      "title": "CEO pay",
      "question": "What is the company's CEO paid?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Data on CEO Salary was obtained from Equilar’s “100 CEO Pay Study,” an annual study of CEOs at the 100 largest U.S. publicly-traded companies. We summed Salary, Bonus, and Other compensation to get non-stock compensation. This measure is most similar to employee data from the PayScale website.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Total Cash Compensation (TCC):</strong> TCC combines base annual salary or hourly wage, bonuses, profit sharing, tips, commissions, and other forms of cash earnings as applicable.  It does not include equity (stock) compensation, cash value of retirement benefits, or the value of other non-cash benefits (e.g. healthcare).</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/PayScale+CEO_pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 703940,
      "name": "Amnesty International+Conflict Minerals Report",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Conflict_Minerals_Report.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available Conflict Minerals Report?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Under US law, certain companies are required to file with the US Securities &amp; Exchange Commission (SEC) a report which describes their efforts to source tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold (3TG) responsibly from the Democratic Republic of the Congo and surrounding countries – called a “Conflict Minerals Report”. This metric states whether a company files a Conflict Minerals Report (or CMR), and links to it as a source when it exists.</p><p>The trade in minerals has been linked to conflict and human rights abuses in countries such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Central African Republic, Afghanistan and Colombia. These minerals – sometimes called “conflict minerals” – are used in a wide variety of goods we use every day like smartphones, laptops and cars.</p><p>The term “adjoining country” or \"covered country\" is defined in Section 1502(e)(1) of the Dodd-Frank Act as a country that shares an internationally recognised border with the Democratic Republic of Congo, which presently includes Angola, Burundi, Central African Republic, the Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia. See [[https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2012/34-67716.pdf| Page 6]] of the Act.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We have collected several hundred \"SD Filings\" submitted by companies in response to the Dodd-Frank Act. Most of these filings include a Conflict Minerals Report - but some companies file to say that they are not required to submit a Conflict Minerals Report.</p><p>If the SD filing source contains a conflict minerals report set the value to \"<strong>Yes</strong>\".</p><p>If the SD filing does not contain (or link to) a conflict minerals report, set the value to \"<strong>No</strong>\". <strong>If this is the case, it is unlikely that you will be able to find answers for the other Amnesty International designed metrics about conflict minerals reports - and so we recommend that you choose a different company to research.</strong></p><p>If you want to research a company that doesn't have existing sources related to Conflict Minerals, [[http://wikirate.org/Finding_Conflict_Minerals_Reports|this page]] has tips on how to find their conflict minerals report.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No",
        "Yes"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10856,
      "bookmarkers": 15,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 1484,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Conflict_Minerals_Report+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 703967,
      "name": "Amnesty International+Conflict Minerals Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Conflict_Minerals_Policy.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "Conflict Minerals Policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available Conflict Minerals Policy or Responsible Sourcing Policy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>Companies should source their minerals responsibly and transparently. </span>Having a publicly available policy setting out how it sources minerals responsibly is a sign that a company takes this issue seriously.</p>\r\n<p><span>The trade in minerals has been linked to conflict and human rights abuses in countries such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Central African Republic, Afghanistan and Colombia. These minerals – sometimes called “conflict minerals” – are used in a wide variety of goods we use every day like smartphones, laptops and cars.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should make their Conflict Minerals Policy or Responsible Sourcing Policy easily accessible, so you may be able to find it using your preferred search engine to search for “[Company Name here] conflict minerals policy” or <span>“[Company Name here] responsible sourcing policy”</span><span>. </span><span>Companies may use another name for this policy – such as “conflict minerals sourcing policy” or “conflict minerals standard”. </span></p>\r\n<p><span>The policy will typically be available in PDF on a company's website. </span>The policy may sometimes form part of a more general company policy (e.g., on supply chains) or may<span> sometimes be included as a section within a company's \"Conflict Minerals Report\". </span>A  “Conflict Minerals Report” is a report that certain companies are required to file on an annual basis under US law. You can find a company’s Conflict Minerals Report and more information about it through <a href=\"/Amnesty_International+Conflict_Minerals_Report\" target=\"_blank\">our metric</a>.</p>\r\n<p><span>If you can find a Conflict Minerals or Responsible Sourcing Policy for a company, set their value to “Yes” and add the source. </span><span>Where applicable, you should also say whether the company has a stand-alone policy on Conflict Minerals or Responsible Sourcing, or whether it forms part of a more general company policy (for example, on supply chains). If the company's policy is not a stand-alone document but included within another document, you should set their value to \"partial\".</span></p>\r\n<p><span>If you can't find a Conflict Minerals or Responsible Sourcing Policy for a company, you should set their value on this metric to “No”, and include some details of how/where you searched as a “Report” source. </span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 17,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Conflict_Minerals_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 703987,
      "name": "Amnesty International+Conflict Minerals Page",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Conflict_Minerals_Page.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "Conflict Minerals Page",
      "question": "Does the company have a page on its website dedicated to conflict minerals or responsible sourcing?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>Companies should send a clear message that they are dedicated to sourcing their minerals responsibly. </span><span>Having a separate page on its website about conflict minerals or responsible sourcing is a sign that the company takes this issue seriously. </span></p>\r\n<p><span>The trade in minerals has been linked to conflict and human rights abuses in countries such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Central African Republic, Afghanistan and Colombia. These minerals – sometimes called “conflict minerals” – are used in a wide variety of goods we use every day like smartphones, laptops and cars.</span></p>\r\n<p><span> </span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Use your preferred search engine to search for “[Company name] conflict minerals” or \"[Company name] responsible sourcing\" – when the company is well known this search should give you some high-ranking results that are pages on the company’s website. For companies that are not so well known, you may wish to limit the search to their official website (e.g. \"site:<a href=\"http://xiaomi-mi.com/\" target=\"_blank\">http://xiaomi-mi.com</a> conflict minerals” or \"site:<a href=\"http://xiaomi-mi.com/\" target=\"_blank\">http://xiaomi-mi.com</a> responsible sourcing”– in Google search).</p>\r\n<p>Having a page on its website dedicated to conflict minerals or responsible sourcing means that the company goes beyond simply having a \"Conflict Minerals Policy\". You can find more information about a company's Conflict Minerals Policy through [[Amnesty_International+Conflict_Minerals_Report| our metric]].</p>\r\n<p>Where the company has a page on their website dedicated to conflict minerals or responsible sourcing, they should receive a value of “Yes” and you should add a link to this page as the source. Where you cannot find a page on the company’s website that is dedicated to conflict minerals or responsible sourcing, set their value to “No” and make a “report” source – describe the domain you searched and give the date (e.g. \"<a href=\"http://xiaomi-mi.com/\" target=\"_blank\">xiaomi-mi.com</a> searched on 15<span>th</span> December 2015, no page about conflict minerals / responsible sourcing found\").</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 17,
      "bookmarkers": 7,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 17,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Conflict_Minerals_Page+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 704020,
      "name": "Amnesty International+Sourcing Minerals Responsibly Globally",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Sourcing_Minerals_Responsibly_Globally.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "Sourcing Minerals Responsibly Globally",
      "question": "Does the company's responsible sourcing policy focus on all conflict-affected or high-risk areas?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies should be taking steps to source minerals responsibly from all conflict-affected or high-risk areas. However, laws on responsible sourcing of minerals tend to focus on the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and its neighbouring countries - the so-called Great Lakes Region. As a result, company may focus their efforts on the DRC or the Great Lakes Region rather than other countries where the trade in minerals is linked to conflict and human rights abuses. If a company's responsible sourcing policy covers all conflict-affected and high-risk areas - as opposed to just the DRC or Great Lakes Region - this would be a good sign that they take the issue seriously and are willing to go beyond the legal requirements.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company's responsible sourcing policy covers all conflict-affected or high-risk areas - not just the DRC or neighbouring countries. To research this metric, you'll need to be familiar with some terms:</p>\r\n<p><strong>Conflict-affected or high-risk area</strong>: A term used in [[http://www.oecd.org/corporate/mne/mining.htm|international standards]] on responsible sourcing of minerals to describe areas where or from which companies need to take extra care when sourcing minerals - for example because they are affected by armed conflict or widespread human rights abuses.  Under international standards, companies should be sourcing minerals responsibly from all conflict-affected or high-risk areas.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Great Lakes Region</strong>: Angola, Burundi, Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Republic of Congo, Kenya, Rwanda, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia.</p>\r\n<p>You should only answer this question with a “Yes” for a company if you find evidence that their responsible sourcing policy covers all conflict-affected and high-risk areas. If you find this kind of evidence and enter a “Yes” value please leave a comment with some details of what you found as a comment. The only way we can find to make this judgment is to read in detail the material the company produces about its responsible sourcing policies and practices. You may be able to make this judgment faster by searching those materials for terms such as \"conflict\" or \"risk\". If you find a faster way to make this judgment while conducting your research, please make a comment and let us know!</p>\r\n<p>You can find relevant materials through the metrics for <a href=\"/Amnesty_International+Conflict_Minerals_Report\" target=\"_blank\">Conflict Minerals Report</a>, <a href=\"/Amnesty_International+Conflict_Minerals_Policy\" target=\"_blank\">Conflict Minerals Policy</a> and <a href=\"/Amnesty_International+Conflict_Minerals_Page\" target=\"_blank\">Conflict Minerals Page</a> – if the company you are researching doesn’t have values for those metrics please consider adding values for those metrics before you add one for this.</p>\r\n<p>If you don’t find any evidence that the company's responsible sourcing policy covers all conflict-affected and high-risk areas – set the company’s value to “No” and include the document(s) you read as source(s) as well as a list of countries covered by the company's policy.</p>\r\n<p>When researching a company on this metric, you might also want to consider researching the [[Amnesty_International+Sourcing_All_Minerals_Responsibly | sourcing all minerals responsibly metric]] because they both involve reading the same sources.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Yes or No",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 9,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Sourcing_Minerals_Responsibly_Globally+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 704035,
      "name": "Amnesty International+Sourcing All Minerals Responsibly",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Sourcing_All_Minerals_Responsibly.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "Sourcing All Minerals Responsibly",
      "question": "Does the company's conflict minerals / responsible sourcing policy focus on minerals other than tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>Laws on responsible sourcing of minerals generally focus on tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold (3TG). If a company has a policy on sourcing other minerals responsibly, this would be a good sign that they take the issue seriously and are willing to go beyond the legal requirements.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To research this metric you need to be familiar with some mineral terms:</p>\r\n<p><strong>cassiterite</strong><span> (the metal ore from which </span><strong>tin</strong><span> is extracted)</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>columbite-tantalite</strong>, also known as <strong>coltan</strong> (the metal ore from which <strong>tantalum</strong> is extracted)</p>\r\n<p><strong>wolframite</strong><span> (the metal ore from which </span><strong>tungsten</strong><span> is extracted)</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>gold</strong></p>\r\n<p><strong>All of the terms above relate to 3TG minerals - tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold</strong>. This metric is asking whether the company's responsible sourcing practices also extend to <strong>non-3TG minerals</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>You should only answer this question with a “Yes” for a company if you find evidence that they have a policy on sourcing responsibly at least one non-3TG mineral - for example diamonds, cobalt or copper. If you find this kind of evidence and enter a “Yes” value please leave a comment with some details of what you found (e.g. which minerals) as a comment. The only way we can find to make this judgment is to read in detail the material the company produces about its sourcing policies and practices. If you find a faster way to make this judgment while conducting your research, please make a comment and let us know!</p>\r\n<p>To research this metric you should read the materials a company produces about its sourcing policies and practices <span>and see if they apply to non-3TG minerals.</span></p>\r\n<p>You can find relevant materials through the metrics for <a href=\"/Amnesty_International+Conflict_Minerals_Report\" target=\"_blank\">Conflict Minerals Report</a><span>, </span><a href=\"/Amnesty_International+Conflict_Minerals_Policy\" target=\"_blank\">Conflict Minerals Policy</a><span> and </span><a href=\"/Amnesty_International+Conflict_Minerals_Page\" target=\"_blank\">Conflict Minerals Page</a> – if the company you are researching doesn’t have values for those metrics please consider adding values for those metrics before you add one for this.</p>\r\n<p><span>If you don’t find any evidence that the company sources minerals other than 3TG responsibly – set the company’s value to “No” and include the document(s) you read as source(s).</span></p>\r\n<p><span>When researching a company on this metric, you might also want to consider researching the [[Amnesty_International+Sourcing_Minerals_Responsibly_Globally | sourcing minerals responsibly globally metric]] because they both involve reading the same sources.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 6,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Sourcing_All_Minerals_Responsibly+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 782530,
      "name": "Global Witness+Does the company purposefully avoid countries covered by the US legislation?",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Witness+Does_the_company_purposefully_avoid_countries_covered_by_the_US_legislation.json",
      "designer": "Global Witness",
      "title": "Does the company purposefully avoid countries covered by the US legislation?",
      "question": "Does the company that you are evaluating include any language in its conflict minerals report that indicates that it has purposefully avoided sourcing from conflict-affected and high risk areas and/or countries covered by the US law?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Section 1502 is a disclosure requirement that calls on companies to determine whether their products contain certain minerals – by carrying out supply chain due diligence – and to report this to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). As such, Section 1502 does not require companies to stop sourcing from the Democratic Republic of Congo or neighbouring countries that are covered by the law. However, some companies have reported in their conflict minerals reports that they have chosen to avoid or stop sourcing from countries that are covered by the law, rather than remain responsibly engaged.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Once you have identified your company's conflict minerals report it's time to read through it! To establish whether the company you are evaluating has chosen to avoid or withdraw from the countries covered by Section 1502 of the Dodd Frank Act (as a reminder, these are: Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Central Africa Republic, South Sudan, Zambia, Angola, The Republic of the Congo,<span>Tanz</span>ania, Burundi, Rwanda, Uganda) you need to read through the report narrative. Watch out for phrases like 'we no longer source from' or 'we avoid buying or sourcing from'. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Witness+Does_the_company_purposefully_avoid_countries_covered_by_the_US_legislation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 801164,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Total water withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_water_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Total water withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)",
      "question": "How much water did the company withdraw (in cubic metres)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000089850\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 303</a> addresses the topic of water and effluents. Access to fresh water is essential for human life and wellbeing, and is recognized by the United Nations (UN) as a human right. The Sustainable Development Goals, adopted by the UN as part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, include key targets related to sustainable water management under Goal 6: ‘Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all’. These targets aim, for example, to achieve universal access to safe and affordable drinking water, improve water quality, and address water scarcity.</p>\r\n<p>The amount of water withdrawn and consumed by an organization and the quality of its discharges, can impact the functioning of the ecosystem in numerous ways. Direct impacts on a catchment can have wider impacts on the quality of life in an area, including social and economic consequences for local communities and indigenous peoples. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Water withdrawal</strong> - sum of all water drawn from surface water, groundwater, seawater, or a third party for any use over the course of the reporting period</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">G4-EN8 is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, and the </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">new GRI 303-3 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Total_water_withdrawals_G4_EN8_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify the total amount of water withdrawn by an organization for a specific year.</p>\r\n<p>Start by looking for publicly available documents that may contain this information, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Annual Report (with Non-Financial Data)</li>\r\n<li>ESG Report</li>\r\n<li>Impact Report</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability Report</li>\r\n<li>Climate Disclosure</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\"><strong>Do NOT use the following reports</strong></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Form 10-K</li>\r\n<li>Annual Information Form (if it contains only financial data)</li>\r\n<li>Interim Report</li>\r\n<li>Quarterly Report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p>- Water</p>\r\n<p>- Withdrawal</p>\r\n<p>- Water use</p>\r\n<p>- 303-3</p>\r\n<p>- GRI</p>\r\n<p>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units</span></p>\r\n<p>Companies may report water withdrawals in hundreds, thousands or millions of litres, gallons or cubic feet. <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">The answer for this metric must be entered into Wikirate in cubic metres (M3)</span>. Make sure you check the unit of measurement and do any conversions necessary. Enter the full number into the answer field.</p>\r\n<p>E.g. If the company reports its total water withdrawals as '5 million gallons' the answer should be converted to cubic feet (M3) and entered on Wikirate as '22730.45 M3'</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "cubic metres",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 303 - Water and Effluents",
        "GRI Standards+303-3 Water withdrawal",
        "GRI Standards+303-3-a Water withdrawal from all areas, broken down by source",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E3 - Water",
        "ESRS Standards+E3.4 - Water metrics",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6: Clean Water and Sanitation",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6.4 Increase water-use efficiency and ensure sustainable freshwater supply to address water scarcity."
      ],
      "scores": [
        "Global Reporting Initiative+Total water withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2996,
      "bookmarkers": 21,
      "datasets": 75,
      "companies": 1146,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_water_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Water_use_per_Profit.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Environmental_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Water_Use.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Water_use_per_dollar_revenue.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Water_use_per_dollar_of_revenue.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Water_Use.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_water_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 801183,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Third-party water withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Third_party_water_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Third-party water withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)",
      "question": "How much third-party water did the company withdraw (in cubic metres)? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000089850\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 303</a> addresses the topic of water and effluents. Access to fresh water is essential for human life and wellbeing, and is recognized by the United Nations (UN) as a human right. The Sustainable Development Goals, adopted by the UN as part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, include key targets related to sustainable water management under Goal 6: ‘Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all’. These targets aim, for example, to achieve universal access to safe and affordable drinking water, improve water quality, and address water scarcity.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The amount of water withdrawn and consumed by an organization and the quality of its discharges, can impact the functioning of the ecosystem in numerous ways. Direct impacts on a catchment can have wider impacts on the quality of life in an area, including social and economic consequences for local communities and indigenous peoples. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Third-party water </strong>- municipal water suppliers and municipal wastewater treatment plants, public or private utilities, and other organizations involved in the provision, transport, treatment, disposal, or use of water and effluent</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">G4-EN8 is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, and the </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">new GRI 303-3 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Municipal_water_withdrawals_G4_EN8_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify the surface water withdrawn by an organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 1rem;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p>- Water</p>\r\n<p>- Third-party water</p>\r\n<p>- Municipal water</p>\r\n<p>- Withdrawal</p>\r\n<p>- 303-3</p>\r\n<p>- GRI</p>\r\n<p>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units</span></p>\r\n<p>Companies may report water withdrawals in hundreds, thousands or millions of litres, gallons or cubic feet. <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">The answer for this metric must be entered into Wikirate in cubic metres (M3)</span>. Make sure you check the unit of measurement and do any conversions necessary. Enter the full number into the answer field.</p>\r\n<p>E.g. If the company reports its municipal water withdrawals as '5 million gallons' the answer should be converted to cubic feet (M3) and entered on Wikirate as '22730.45 M3'</p>\r\n<p><em>Note: The G4 Standard version of this metric only addressed municipal water withdrawals. The new GRI Standard addresses municipal water withdrawals and withdrawals from other organizations. </em></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 303 - Water and Effluents",
        "GRI Standards+303-3 Water withdrawal",
        "GRI Standards+303-3-b-v Third-party water withdrawal from all areas with water stress by the withdrawal sources",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6: Clean Water and Sanitation",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6.4 Increase water-use efficiency and ensure sustainable freshwater supply to address water scarcity."
      ],
      "scores": [
        "Global Reporting Initiative+Third-party water withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2217,
      "bookmarkers": 9,
      "datasets": 34,
      "companies": 929,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Third_party_water_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Third_party_water_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 801317,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Water Recycled (%) (G4-EN10-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Water_Recycled_G4_EN10_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Water Recycled (%) (G4-EN10-b)",
      "question": "What percentage of water used by the company was recycled or reused? (G4-EN10-b)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/water/Pages/G4-EN10.aspx|G4-EN10]] – '<strong>Percentage </strong>and total volume<strong> of water recycled and reused</strong>'. This metric is for recording the total volume of water recycled and reused as a percentage of the total water withdrawal reported under Indicator [[http://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/water/Pages/G4-EN8.aspx | G4-EN8]] .</p><p>​This Indicator measures both water that was treated prior to reuse and water that was not treated prior to reuse. Grey water (that is, collected rainwater and wastewater generated by household processes such as washing dishes, laundry, and bathing) is included.<br><br>The rate of water reuse and recycling is a measure of efficiency and demonstrates the success of the organization in reducing total water withdrawals and discharges. Increased reuse and recycling may result in a reduction of water consumption, treatment, and disposal costs. The reduction of water consumption over time through reuse and recycling may also contribute to local, national, or regional goals for managing water supplies.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the percentage of the water used by the company was recycled or reused</strong> <strong>in cubic metres:</strong></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.</p><ul><li><p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL F, Command F or search button on source window to search for this index and metrics within the report</p></li><li><p>Use G4 codes, G3 codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. G4-EN10 or EN10, water recycled or water reused</p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value</p></li><li><p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><strong>Global Reporting Initiative compliance guidance for companies:</strong></p><p>To calculate Water Recycled (%) - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/water/Pages/G4-EN10.aspx|G4-EN10]]-b:</p><ul><li><p>​​Identify the volume of recycled and reused water.</p></li><li><p>Identify if water or flow meters do not exist and estimation by modeling is required.</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>For example, if the organization has a production cycle that requires 20 cubic meters of water per cycle, the organization withdraws 20 cubic meters of water for one production process cycle and then reuses it for an additional three cycles. The total volume of water recycled and reused for that process is 60 cubic meters.</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Then convert this volume to a percentage of the total water withdrawal reported.</p></li></ul><p>Reporting on this Indicator should include the following contextual information as a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>G4-EN10-c: standards, methodologies, and assumptions used.</p></li></ul><p><strong>Note: </strong>Due to the way this is calculated, where water can be re-used multiple times, it is possible for a company’s recycling rate to be recycle greater than 100%, and at least one company has reported such a rate.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6: Clean Water and Sanitation",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6.3 Improve water quality by reducing pollution, halving untreated wastewater, and increasing recycling and safe reuse."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2133,
      "bookmarkers": 7,
      "datasets": 60,
      "companies": 892,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Water_Recycled_GRI_303_3.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Water_Recycled_G4_EN10_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 801383,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Environmental Fines, GRI 307-1 (formerly G4-EN29-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Fines_GRI_307_1_formerly_G4_EN29_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Environmental Fines, GRI 307-1 (formerly G4-EN29-a)",
      "question": "What is the total monetary value (in USD) of significant fines for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations incurred by the organization?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. <br><br>In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water, and ecosystems.<br><br>GRI 307 addresses the topic of environmental compliance, covering an organization’s compliance with environmental laws and/or regulations. This includes compliance with international declarations, conventions and treaties, as well as national, sub-national, regional, and local regulations. <br><br>Non-compliance within an organization can indicate the ability of management to ensure that operations conform to certain performance parameters. In some circumstances, non-compliance can lead to clean-up obligations or other costly environmental liabilities. The strength of an organization’s compliance record can also affect its ability to expand operations or gain permits.<br><br></p>\r\n<p><em>*In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-EN29 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 307-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found [[https://wikirate.org/Environmental%20fines%20(G4-EN29-a)%20Methodology|here]].</em></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To identify the monetary value of significant fines look for:</p>\r\n<p>-Significant fines and non-monetary sanctions for non-compliance with environmental laws and/or regulations in terms of total monetary value of significant fines.</p>\r\n<p><br>If the organization has not identified any non-compliance with environmental laws and/or regulations, look for their statement of this fact and cite it in the comments section.<br><br><strong>Keywords and search terms for this metric:</strong> <br><br>- Environmental<br>- Compliance<br>- Fines<br>- 307<br>- GRI<br>- GRI Index<br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data. <br><br><strong>Units</strong><br><br>The reporting unit is US Dollars. If the value is reported different currency please consult <a href=\"https://www.ofx.com/en-gb/forex-news/historical-exchange-rates/yearly-average-rates/\">this page</a> to find the conversion rate to use according to the company's reporting year. Once you have found the correct conversion rate, multiply that number by your answer to get the USD rate. Include this calculation in your comments.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reputational Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Global Reporting Initiative+Environmental Fines, GRI 307-1 (formerly G4-EN29-a)+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3457,
      "bookmarkers": 62,
      "datasets": 87,
      "companies": 1306,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Fines_GRI_307_1_formerly_G4_EN29_a+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Environmental_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Wollongong_Research_Group_2020+Wollongong_2020_Climate_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Damage_Protection_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Fines_GRI_307_1_formerly_G4_EN29_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 801523,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Rainwater collected directly and stored (G4-EN8-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Rainwater_collected_directly_and_stored_G4_EN8_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Rainwater collected directly and stored (G4-EN8-a)",
      "question": "How much rainwater did the company collect and store (in cubic metres)? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 standard. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator </span><span>[[http://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/water/Pages/G4-EN8.aspx|G4-EN8]] - 'Total water withdrawal by source'. <span>This metric is for recording the total<strong> </strong></span>volume of rainwater collected and stored by the organization<strong>.</strong><span> </span>Additional sources the indicator specifies that companies should disclose include <span>Surface water (including water from wetlands, rivers, lakes, and oceans), </span><span>Ground water, </span><span>Rainwater collected directly and stored by the organization, </span><span>Waste water from another organization</span><span> or other water utilities. <br></span></span></p>\r\n<p>Reporting the total volume of water withdrawn by source contributes to an understanding of the overall scale of potential impacts and risks associated with the organization’s water use. The total volume withdrawn provides an indication of the organization’s relative size and importance as a user of water, and provides a baseline figure for other calculations relating to efficiency and use.<br><br>The systematic effort to monitor and improve the efficient use of water in the organization is directly linked to water consumption costs. Total water use can also indicate the level of risk posed by disruptions to water supplies or increases in the cost of water. Clean freshwater is becoming increasingly scarce, and can impact production processes that rely on large volumes of water. In regions where water sources are highly restricted, the organization’s water consumption patterns can also influence relations with other stakeholders.<span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the total amount of rainwater the company collects and stores in cubic metres?</strong></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.</p><ul><li><p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL F, Command F or search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p></li><li><p>Use G4 codes, G3 codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. G4-EN8 or EN8, rainwater or rain water </p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value</p></li><li><p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><strong>Global Reporting Initiative compliance guidance for companies:</strong></p><p>​To calculate rainwater collected - [[http://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/water/Pages/G4-EN8.aspx | G4-EN8]]-a:</p><ul><li><p>Identify the total volume of water withdrawn from any water source. This includes the abstraction of cooling water. Identify whether these calculations are estimated, modelled or sourced from direct measurements. If estimation or modelling is required, identify the methods used.</p></li></ul><p>This Indicator may include water that was either withdrawn directly by the organization or through intermediaries such as water utilities.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6: Clean Water and Sanitation",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6.3 Improve water quality by reducing pollution, halving untreated wastewater, and increasing recycling and safe reuse."
      ],
      "scores": [
        "Global Reporting Initiative+Rainwater collected directly and stored (G4-EN8-a)+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1927,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 33,
      "companies": 797,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Rainwater_collected_directly_and_stored_G4_EN8_a+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Rainwater_collected_directly_and_stored_G4_EN8_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 801561,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Groundwater withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Groundwater_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Groundwater withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)",
      "question": "How much groundwater did the company withdraw (in cubic metres)? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000089850\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 303</a> addresses the topic of water and effluents. Access to fresh water is essential for human life and wellbeing, and is recognized by the United Nations (UN) as a human right. The Sustainable Development Goals, adopted by the UN as part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, include key targets related to sustainable water management under Goal 6: ‘Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all’. These targets aim, for example, to achieve universal access to safe and affordable drinking water, improve water quality, and address water scarcity.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The amount of water withdrawn and consumed by an organization and the quality of its discharges, can impact the functioning of the ecosystem in numerous ways. Direct impacts on a catchment can have wider impacts on the quality of life in an area, including social and economic consequences for local communities and indigenous peoples. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong>Groundwater</strong> - water that is being held in, and that can be recovered from, an underground formation</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">G4-EN8 is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, and the </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">new GRI 303-3 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Ground_Water_Withdrawals_G4_EN8_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question, you are being asked to identify the groundwater withdrawn by an organization for a specific year.</p>\r\n<p>Start by looking for <span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>PUBLICLY AVAILABLE </strong></span>documents that may contain this information, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Annual Report (with Non-Financial Data)</li>\r\n<li>ESG Report</li>\r\n<li>Impact Report</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability Report</li>\r\n<li>Climate Disclosure</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\"><strong>Do NOT use the following reports:</strong></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Form 10-K</li>\r\n<li>Annual Information Form (if it contains only financial data)</li>\r\n<li>Interim Report</li>\r\n<li>Quarterly Report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 1rem;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p>- Water</p>\r\n<p>- Groundwater</p>\r\n<p>- Withdrawal</p>\r\n<p>- 303-3</p>\r\n<p>- GRI</p>\r\n<p>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units</span></p>\r\n<p>Companies may report water withdrawals in hundreds, thousands or millions of litres, gallons or cubic feet. <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">The answer for this metric must be entered into Wikirate in cubic metres (M3)</span>. Make sure you check the unit of measurement and do any conversions necessary. Enter the full number into the answer field.</p>\r\n<p>E.g. If the company reports its groundwater withdrawals as '5 million gallons' the answer should be converted to cubic feet (M3) and entered on Wikirate as '22730.45 M3'</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 303 - Water and Effluents",
        "GRI Standards+303-3 Water withdrawal",
        "GRI Standards+303-3-a Water withdrawal from all areas, broken down by source",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E3 - Water",
        "ESRS Standards+E3.4 - Water metrics",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6: Clean Water and Sanitation",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6.4 Increase water-use efficiency and ensure sustainable freshwater supply to address water scarcity.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6.6 Protect and restore water-related ecosystems such as wetlands, rivers, forests, and lakes."
      ],
      "scores": [
        "Global Reporting Initiative+Groundwater withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2240,
      "bookmarkers": 15,
      "datasets": 49,
      "companies": 881,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Groundwater_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Philipp_Kuehl+Groundwater_per_employees.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Groundwater_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 801619,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Waste Water Used (G4-EN8-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Waste_Water_Used_G4_EN8_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Waste Water Used (G4-EN8-a)",
      "question": "How much waste water (from another organization) did the company use (in cubic metres)? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/water/Pages/G4-EN8.aspx|G4-EN8]] – 'Total water withdrawal by source'. This metric is for recording the total volume of<strong> waste water from another organization</strong> used by the company. Additional sources the indicator specifies that companies should disclose include Surface water (including water from wetlands, rivers, lakes, and oceans), Ground water, Rainwater collected directly and stored by the organization, water used by the company from municipal sources or other water utilities.</p><p>​Reporting the total volume of water withdrawn by source contributes to an understanding of the overall scale of potential impacts and risks associated with the organization’s water use. The total volume withdrawn provides an indication of the organization’s relative size and importance as a user of water, and provides a baseline figure for other calculations relating to efficiency and use.</p><p>The systematic effort to monitor and improve the efficient use of water in the organization is directly linked to water consumption costs. Total water use can also indicate the level of risk posed by disruptions to water supplies or increases in the cost of water. Clean freshwater is becoming increasingly scarce, and can impact production processes that rely on large volumes of water. In regions where water sources are highly restricted, the organization’s water consumption patterns can also influence relations with other stakeholders.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the total amount of waste water (from another company) used by the company in cubic metres:</strong></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.</p><ul><li><p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL F, Command F or search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p></li><li><p>Use G4 codes, G3 codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. G4-EN8 or EN8, waste water or waste-water</p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value</p></li><li><p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><strong>Global Reporting Initiative compliance guidance for companies:</strong></p><p>To calculate Waste Water Used - [[http://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/water/Pages/G4-EN8.aspx | G4-EN8]]-a:</p><ul><li><p>​Identify the total volume of water withdrawn from waste water sources from another organization. This includes the abstraction of cooling water. Identify whether these calculations are estimated, modelled or sourced from direct measurements. If estimation or modelling is required, identify the methods used in the comments section.</p></li></ul><p>This Indicator may include water that was either withdrawn directly by the organization or through intermediaries such as water utilities.</p><p><strong>Note</strong>: In some cases, a company reports their total water usage and breaks it down by origin in percentage - in these cases, you can add a value by finding the correct percentage of the total. For example, if a company uses 1000 cubic metres and says that 50% is from waste water sources you can multiply 1000 by 0.50 to find the correct value (500).</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6: Clean Water and Sanitation",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6.3 Improve water quality by reducing pollution, halving untreated wastewater, and increasing recycling and safe reuse."
      ],
      "scores": [
        "Global Reporting Initiative+Waste Water Used (G4-EN8-a)+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1871,
      "bookmarkers": 8,
      "datasets": 38,
      "companies": 794,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Waste_Water_Used_G4_EN8_a+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Waste_Water_Used_G4_EN8_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 802230,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Economic value retained, GRI 201-1 (G4-EC1-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Economic_value_retained_GRI_201_1_G4_EC1_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Economic value retained, GRI 201-1 (G4-EC1-a)",
      "question": "How much economic value does the company retain (Economic Value Generated - Economic Value Distributed)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. <br></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the economic dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the economic conditions of its stakeholders, and on economic systems at local, national, and global levels.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\"> [[https://wikirate.org/Source_000090307|GRI 201]] addresses the topic of economic performance. This includes the economic value generated by an organization; its defined benefit plan obligations; the financial assistance it receives from any government; and the financial implications of climate change. Information on the creation and distribution of economic value provides a basic indication of how an organization has created wealth for stakeholders. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">Several components of the economic value generated and distributed (EVG&amp;D) also provide an economic profile of an organization, which can be useful for normalizing other performance figures. If presented in country-level detail, EVG&amp;D can provide a useful picture of the direct monetary value added to local economies.</span></p>\r\n<hr>\r\n<p><em><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-EC1-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 201-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found [[https://wikirate.org/Economic%20Value%20Retained%20G4-EC1-a%20Methodology|here]]. </span></em></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To calculate the direct economic value that the company retains:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Compile the EVG&amp;D data (see [[https://wikirate.org/GRI_201_Economic_Performance|GRI 201-1]]), where possible, from data in the organization’s audited financial or profit and loss (P&amp;L) statement, or its internally audited management accounts.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Subtract the Economic Value Distributed (EVD) from the Economic Value Generated (EVG), this will give you the Economic Value Retained (EVR).</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 201 - Economic Performance",
        "GRI Standards+201-1 Direct economic value generated and distributed",
        "GRI Standards+201-1-a-iii Economic value retained: \"direct economic value generated\" less \"economic value distributed\""
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 219,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 93,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Economic_value_retained_GRI_201_1_G4_EC1_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 813420,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Ratio of entry-level wage to local minimum-wage by gender, GRI 202 (G4-EC5)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Ratio_of_entry_level_wage_to_local_minimum_wage_by_gender_GRI_202_G4_EC5.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Ratio of entry-level wage to local minimum-wage by gender, GRI 202 (G4-EC5)",
      "question": "Does the organization report the ratios of standard entry level wage by gender compared to local minimum wage at significant locations of operation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Standards. In the context of the GRI Standards, the economic dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the economic conditions of its stakeholders, and on economic systems at local, national, and global levels. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"><strong>GRI 202 addresses the topic of an organization’s market presence, covering its contribution to economic development in the local areas or communities where it operates.</strong> </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">This disclosure applies to those organizations in which a substantial portion of their employees, and workers (excluding employees) performing the organization’s activities, are compensated in a manner or scale that is closely linked to laws or regulations on minimum wage.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Providing wages above the minimum wage can help contribute to the economic well-being of workers performing the organization’s activities. The impacts of wage levels are immediate, and they directly affect individuals, organizations, countries and economies The distribution of wages is crucial for eliminating inequalities, such as wage gap differences between women and men, or nationals and migrants.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Also, entry level wages paid compared to local minimum wages show the competitiveness of an organization’s wages and provide information relevant for assessing the effect of wages on the local labor market. Comparing this information by gender can also be a measure of an organization’s approach to equal  opportunity in the workplace,</span></p>\r\n<hr>\r\n<p><em><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-EC5 -a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 202-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found [[https://wikirate.org/Gender%20Entry%20Level%20Pay%20G4-EC5%20Methodology|here]].</span></em></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify wether the organization discloses the ratios of standard entry level wage by gender compared to local minimum wage for a specific year.</p>\r\n<p>Keywords and search terms for this metric:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Entry level</li>\r\n<li>Minimum wage</li>\r\n<li>202</li>\r\n<li>GRI</li>\r\n<li>GRI Index</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below.</p>\r\n<p>Select the '<strong><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\">Unknown</span></strong>' answer box if the company has not published the data. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": ":1",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 202 - Market Presence",
        "GRI Standards+202-1 Ratios of standard entry level wage by gender compared to local minimum wage",
        "GRI Standards+202-1-a Entry-level-to-minimum wage ratio (by gender and key location) and whether a significant share earn minimum wage."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Ratio_of_entry_level_wage_to_local_minimum_wage_by_gender_GRI_202_G4_EC5+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 813500,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Collective Bargaining (G4-11)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Collective_Bargaining_G4_11.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Collective Bargaining (G4-11)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of total employees covered by collective bargaining agreements?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/general-standard-disclosures/strategy-and-profile/organizational-profile/Pages/G4-11.aspx | G4-11]] -  ‘Report the percentage of total employees covered by collective bargaining agreements’. </p>\r\n<p><span>The percentage of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements is the most direct way to demonstrate an organization’s practices in relation to freedom of association.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>Freedom of association is a human right as defined by international declarations and conventions, particularly International Labour Organization (ILO) Conventions 87 ‘Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention’ and 98 ‘Right to Organize and Collective Bargaining Convention’. Collective bargaining is an important form of stakeholder engagement that helps build institutional frameworks and is seen by many as contributing to a stable society. Together with corporate governance, collective bargaining is part of an overall framework that contributes to responsible management. It is an instrument used by parties to facilitate collaborative efforts to enhance the positive social impacts of an organization. </span><span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the percentage (%) of total employees covered by collective bargaining agreements:</strong></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong><br>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.<br></p><ul><li><p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL F, Command F or search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p></li><li><p>Use G4 codes, G3 codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. G4-11, collective bargaining or union agreements</p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value</p></li><li><p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p></p><p><strong>Global Reporting Initiative compliance guidance for companies:</strong></p><p>To calculate the percentage of total employees covered by collective bargaining agreements - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/general-standard-disclosures/strategy-and-profile/organizational-profile/Pages/G4-11.aspx | G4-11]]:</p><ul><li><p>Identify the total number of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements. Use this data to calculate the percentage.</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 2 - General Disclosures",
        "GRI Standards+2-30 Collective bargaining agreements",
        "GRI Standards+2-30-a Collective bargaining coverage",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+S1 - Own Workforce",
        "ESRS Standards+S1.7 - Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3314,
      "bookmarkers": 20,
      "datasets": 99,
      "companies": 1376,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Social_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Yearly_change_in_collective_bargaining_representation.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Collective_bargaining_GRI_102_41.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Sussex_Research_Group+Diversity_Inclusion_Disclosure.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Collective_Bargaining_G4_11+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 813606,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Highest paid worker to median worker pay ratio (G4-54)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Highest_paid_worker_to_median_worker_pay_ratio_G4_54.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Highest paid worker to median worker pay ratio (G4-54)",
      "question": "What is the ratio of the annual compensation for the organization's highest-paid individual to the median annual compensation for all employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers part of the information required by [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/general-standard-disclosures/governance-and-ethics/governance/remuneration-and-incentives/Pages/G4-54.aspx| G4-54]] - 'Report the ratio of the annual total compensation for the organization’s highest-paid individual in each country of significant operations to the median annual total compensation for all employees (excluding the highest-paid individual) in the same country.'</span><span> </span><span>In addition, G4-54 asks to calculate this ratio for each country of significant operations.</span></p>\r\n<p>The remuneration arrangements support the strategic aims of the organization when aligned with the interests of stakeholders. They can enable the recruitment, motivation, and retention of members of the highest governance body, senior executives, and employees.</p>\r\n<p>The annual total compensation includes salary, bonus, stock awards, option awards, non-equity incentive plan compensation, change in pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation earnings, and all other compensation.  </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To calculate the ratio of the annual total compensation for the organization’s highest-paid individual to the median annual total compensation for all employees (excluding the highest-paid individual) in the same country - <span>[[https://g4.globalreporting.org/general-standard-disclosures/governance-and-ethics/governance/remuneration-and-incentives/Pages/G4-54.aspx| G4-54]]</span>: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Identify the highest-paid individual for the reporting year, defined by total compensation  </span></li>\r\n<li><span></span>Calculate median annual total compensation for all employees except the highest-paid individual</li>\r\n<li>Calculate the ratio of the annual total compensation of the highest-paid individual to the median annual total compensation for all employees </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span>Depending on the organization’s remuneration policy and availability of data, the following components may be considered for the calculation: </span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Base salary: guaranteed, short term, non-variable cash compensation </span></li>\r\n<li><span></span>Cash compensation: sum of base salary + cash allowances + bonuses + commissions + cash profit-sharing + other forms of variable cash payments </li>\r\n<li>Direct compensation: sum of total cash compensation + total fair value of all annual long-term incentives (such as stock option awards, restricted stock shares or units, performance stock shares or units, phantom stock shares, stock appreciation rights, and long-term cash awards) </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<div><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong><span> </span></div>\r\n<div>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</div>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": ":1",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 206,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Number_of_labour_related_GRI_disclosures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Highest_paid_worker_to_median_worker_pay_ratio_G4_54+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 813691,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Reductions in energy requirements of products and services, GRI 302-5 (formerly G4-EN7)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Reductions_in_energy_requirements_of_products_and_services_GRI_302_5_formerly_G4_EN7.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Reductions in energy requirements of products and services, GRI 302-5 (formerly G4-EN7)",
      "question": "In relation to the previous year, how much has the company reduced the energy requirements of its products and/or services?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090311\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 302</a> addresses the topic of energy. An organization can consume energy in various forms, such as fuel, electricity, heating, cooling or steam. Energy can be self-generated or purchased from external sources and it can come from renewable sources (such as wind, hydro or solar) or from non-renewable sources (such as coal, petroleum or natural gas).</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Using energy more efficiently and opting for renewable energy sources is essential for combating climate change and for lowering an organization’s overall environmental footprint. The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to energy, and how it manages them.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Energy reduction</span> - amount of energy no longer used or needed to carry out the same processes or tasks</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">G4-EN7 is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, and the new </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">GRI 302-5 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Reduction_in_energy_requirements_of_products_and_services_G4_EN7_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the percentage reduction of energy requirements of an organization's products and services for a specific year in relation to the previous year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Energy</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Reduction</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- 302-5</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Companies may report energy consumption reduction in hundreds, thousands or millions of gigajoules or joules. The answer for this metric must be entered into Wikirate as a percentage reduction compared to the previous year. If the organization has not achieved any reduction in the energy requirements of its products and services, enter the answer as '0'.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 295,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 13,
      "companies": 155,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Reductions_in_energy_requirements_of_products_and_services_GRI_302_5_formerly_G4_EN7+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 813914,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Recycled Input Materials (%), GRI 301-2 (formerly G4-EN2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Recycled_Input_Materials_GRI_301_2_formerly_G4_EN2.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Recycled Input Materials (%), GRI 301-2 (formerly G4-EN2)",
      "question": "What percentage of materials used are recycled input materials?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090310\">GRI 301</a> addresses the topic of materials. The inputs used to manufacture and package an organization’s products and services can be nonrenewable materials, such as minerals, metals, oil, gas, or coal; or renewable materials, such as wood or water. Both renewable and non-renewable materials can be composed of virgin or recycled input materials. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The type and amount of materials the organization uses can indicate its dependence on natural resources, and the impacts it has on their availability. The organization’s contribution to resource conservation can be indicated by its approach to recycling, reusing and reclaiming materials, products, and packaging. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to materials, and how it manages these impacts.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Recyled input material</span> - material that replaces virgin materials, which are purchased or obtained from internal or external sources, and that are not by-products and non-product outputs (NPO) produced by the organization</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">G4-EN2 is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, and the</span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> new GRI 301-2 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Recycled_Input_Materials_G4_EN2_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the percentage of recycled input materials used by the organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Material</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Product</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Recycled</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Input material</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- 301-2</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Companies may report their recycled input material as a weight rather than a percentage. To calculate the percentage divide the recycled input material weight by the total input material weight and multiply by 100. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 301 - Materials",
        "GRI Standards+301-2 Recycled input materials used",
        "GRI Standards+301-2-a Percentage of recycled input materials used to manufacture primary products and services",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E5 - Resource Use & Circular Economy",
        "ESRS Standards+E5.4 - Resource Inflows"
      ],
      "scores": [
        "Global Reporting Initiative+Recycled Input Materials (%), GRI 301-2 (formerly G4-EN2)+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 298,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 208,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Recycled_Input_Materials_GRI_301_2_formerly_G4_EN2+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Recycled_Input_Materials_GRI_301_2_formerly_G4_EN2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 813970,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) emissions, GRI 305-7-a (formerly G4-EN21-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Volatile_Organic_Compounds_VOC_emissions_GRI_305_7_a_formerly_G4_EN21_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) emissions, GRI 305-7-a (formerly G4-EN21-a)",
      "question": "How many metric tonnes of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) does the company emit?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards).</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Metric is part of a standard set of indicators outlined in the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standard <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">(GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Guidelines</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The full set can be downloaded at</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric covering </span><em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur oxides (SOX), among other significant air emissions</span></em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, the code G4-EN21 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new code <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">GRI 305-7</span> is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Nitrogen%20oxides%20(NOX),%20sulfur%20oxides%20(SOX),%20and%20other%20significant%20air%20emissions%20G4%20EN21%20Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water and ecosystems. GRI 305 addresses emissions into air, which are the discharge of substances from a source into the atmosphere. Types of emissions include: greenhouse gas (GHG), ozone-depleting substances (ODS), and nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur oxides (SOX), among other significant air emissions.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Pollutants such as NOX and SOX have adverse effects on climate, ecosystems, air quality, habitats, agriculture, and human and animal health</span>. Deterioration of air quality, acidification, forest degradation and public health concerns have led to local and international regulations to control emissions of these pollutants.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Reductions in the emission of regulated pollutants lead to improved health conditions for workers and local communities and can enhance relations with affected stakeholders. In regions with emission caps, the volume of emissions also has direct cost implications.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Other significant air emissions include, for example, persistent organic pollutants or particulate matter, as well as air emissions that are regulated under international conventions and/or national laws or regulations, including those listed on an organization’s environmental permits.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question you need to identify in </span><em style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">tonnes</em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, the amount of </span><strong>Volatile Organic Compound</strong><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\"> (VOC) emissions </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">reported by the organization for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> and search terms: Volatile Organic Compound, VOC, GRI, 305-7, Emissions, Pollutants</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">calculations or conversions </span>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report their VOC emissions in thousands or millions of tonnes. Companies may also report using different units, such as <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">kilos rather than tonnes. </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Make sure you check the unit of measurement and enter the full number into the answer field</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">E.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes VOCs' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500,000 tonnes'. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://convertunits.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 305 - Emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-7 Nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and other significant air emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-7-a Significant air emissions by category",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.4 Ensure environmentally sound management of chemicals and waste and reduce their release to air, water, and soil.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13: Climate Action",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13.2 Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2328,
      "bookmarkers": 11,
      "datasets": 41,
      "companies": 975,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Volatile_Organic_Compounds_VOC_emissions_GRI_305_7_a_formerly_G4_EN21_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 814044,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Senior management hired from the local community, GRI 202-2 (formerly G4-EC6-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Senior_management_hired_from_the_local_community_GRI_202_2_formerly_G4_EC6_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Senior management hired from the local community, GRI 202-2 (formerly G4-EC6-a)",
      "question": "What percentage of senior management are hired from the local community at significant locations of operation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines.</p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the economic dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the economic conditions of its stakeholders, and on economic systems at local, national, and global levels.<br><br>[[https://wikirate.org/Source_000090308|GRI 202]] addresses the topic of an organization’s market presence, covering its contribution to economic development in the local areas or communities where it operates. <br><br>Including members from the local community in an organization’s senior management demonstrates the organization’s positive market presence. Including local community members in the management team can enhance human capital. It can also increase the economic benefit to the local community, and improve an organization’s ability to understand local needs.<br><br>The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to market presence, and how it manages them.</p>\r\n<hr>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-EC6-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 202-2 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found [[https://wikirate.org/Senior_management_hired_from_local_community_G4_EC6_a_Methodology|here]].</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify the percentage of senior management at significant locations of operation that are hired from the local community. <br><br><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong><br>Senior management hired from the local community includes those individuals either born or who have the legal right to reside indefinitely (such as naturalized citizens or permanent visa holders) in the same geographic market as the operation. The geographical definition of ‘local’ can include the community surrounding operations, a region within a country, or a country.</p>\r\n<p>To calculate the percentage of senior management hired from the local community:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>​Calculate this percentage using data on full-time employees.</li>\r\n<li>If more than one location is reported, the metric value should relate to the location where the company is headquartered.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords and search terms for this metric</strong><br>- Senior Management<br>- Local Community <br>- 202<br>- GRI<br>- GRI Index<br><br>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate (%). If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. <br><br>p(%) = (P / T) x 100<br><br>Where P is the number of senior management positions hired from the local community, and T is the total number of full time employees.</p>\r\n<p><br>Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data. Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below.</p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 13,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Senior_management_hired_from_the_local_community_GRI_202_2_formerly_G4_EC6_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 814954,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions, GRI 305-7-a (formerly G4-EN21-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Nitrogen_oxide_NOX_emissions_GRI_305_7_a_formerly_G4_EN21_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions, GRI 305-7-a (formerly G4-EN21-a)",
      "question": "How many metric tonnes of mono-nitrogen oxides (NOx) does the company emit (in metric tonnes)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards).</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Metric is part of a standard set of indicators outlined in the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standard <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">(GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Guidelines</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The full set can be downloaded at</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric covering </span><em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur oxides (SOX), among other significant air emissions</span></em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, the code G4-EN21 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new code <strong>GRI 305-7</strong> is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Nitrogen%20oxides%20(NOX),%20sulfur%20oxides%20(SOX),%20and%20other%20significant%20air%20emissions%20G4%20EN21%20Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"font-size: 15.2px; background-color: #ffffff;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water and ecosystems. GRI 305 addresses emissions into air, which are the discharge of substances from a source into the atmosphere. Types of emissions include: greenhouse gas (GHG), ozone-depleting substances (ODS), and nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur oxides (SOX), among other significant air emissions.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong>Pollutants such as NOX and SOX have adverse effects on climate, ecosystems, air quality, habitats, agriculture, and human and animal health</strong>. Deterioration of air quality, acidification, forest degradation and public health concerns have led to local and international regulations to control emissions of these pollutants.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Reductions in the emission of regulated pollutants lead to improved health conditions for workers and local communities and can enhance relations with affected stakeholders. In regions with emission caps, the volume of emissions also has direct cost implications.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Other significant air emissions include, for example, persistent organic pollutants or particulate matter, as well as air emissions that are regulated under international conventions and/or national laws or regulations, including those listed on an organization’s environmental permits.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this question, you need to identify, in tonnes, the amount of <strong>NOX emissions </strong>reported by the organization for a specific year. </p>\r\n<p>Start by looking for <span style=\"color: #000000;\">publicly available </span>documents that may contain this information, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Annual Report (with Non-Financial Data)</li>\r\n<li>ESG Report</li>\r\n<li>Impact Report</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability Report</li>\r\n<li>Climate Disclosure</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\"><strong>Do NOT use the following reports</strong></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Form 10-K</li>\r\n<li>Annual Information Form (if it contains only financial data)</li>\r\n<li>Interim Report</li>\r\n<li>Quarterly Report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> <strong>and search terms</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">NOx,</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">GRI, 305-7,</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Emissions,</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Pollutants</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If <strong>calculations or conversions </strong>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report their NOx emissions in thousands or millions of tonnes. Companies may also report using different units, such as <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">kilos rather than tonnes. </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Make sure you check the unit of measurement and enter the full number into the answer field</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">E.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes NOx' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500,000 tonnes'. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://convertunits.com/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3088,
      "bookmarkers": 9,
      "datasets": 82,
      "companies": 1114,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Emissions_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Nitrogen_oxide_NOX_emissions_GRI_305_7_a_formerly_G4_EN21_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 815022,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Proportion of spending on local suppliers, GRI 204-1 (G4-EC9-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Proportion_of_spending_on_local_suppliers_GRI_204_1_G4_EC9_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Proportion of spending on local suppliers, GRI 204-1 (G4-EC9-a)",
      "question": "What proportion of the company's spending goes to local suppliers? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Standards. In the context of the GRI Standards, the economic dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the economic conditions of its stakeholders, and on economic systems at local, national, and global levels.<br><br>[[https://wikirate.org/Source_000090309|GRI 204]] addresses the topic of procurement practices. This covers an organization’s support forlocal suppliers,or those owned by women or members of vulnerablegroups<br><br>By supporting local suppliers, an organization can indirectly attract additional investment to the local economy. Local sourcing can be a strategy to help ensure supply, support a stable local economy, and maintain community relations. <br><br>The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to market presence, and how it manages them.<br><br>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-EC9-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 204-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found [[https://wikirate.org/Local%20suppliers%20spending%20(G4-EC9-a)%20methodology|here]].</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify percentage of the procurement budget used for significant locations of operation that is spent on suppliers local to that operation (such as percentage of products and services purchased locally).</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong><br>Local purchases can be made either from a budget managed at the location of operation or at an organization’s headquarters.</p>\r\n<p>If more than one location is reported, the metric value should relate to the location where the company is headquartered.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords and search terms for this metric</strong><br>- Procurement<br>- Local suppliers <br>- 204<br>- GRI<br>- GRI Index<br><br>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate (%). If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. <br><br>Select the '<strong><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\">Unknown</span></strong>' answer box if the company has not published the data.<br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below.</p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 204 - Procurement Practices",
        "GRI Standards+204-1 Proportion of spending on local suppliers",
        "GRI Standards+204-1-a Percentage of the procurement budget used for significant locations of operation that is spent on suppliers local to that operation",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG10 - Reduced Inequalities",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.7 Promote sustainable public procurement in line with national priorities."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 107,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 16,
      "companies": 74,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Proportion_of_spending_on_local_suppliers_GRI_204_1_G4_EC9_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 815103,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Health and Safety representation (G4-LA5-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Health_and_Safety_representation_G4_LA5_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Health and Safety representation (G4-LA5-b)",
      "question": "What percentage of the total workforce is represented in formal joint management-worker health and safety committees that help monitor and advise on occupational health and safety programs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines.</span><span>[[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/occupational-health-and-safety/Pages/G4-LA5.aspx |G4-LA5]]</span><span></span><span> - </span><span>‘Percentage of total workforce represented in formal joint management–worker health and safety committees that help monitor and advise on occupational health and safety programs’. This disclosure is broader than depicted within the metric description. It also asks for:</span></p>\r\n<p><span>G4-L5-a. The level at which each formal joint management-worker health and safety committee typically operates within the<br>organization.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>A health and safety committee with joint representation can facilitate a positive health and safety culture. The use of committees is one way to involve workers in driving the improvement of occupational health and safety in the workplace. This indicator provides one measure of the extent to which the workforce is actively involved in health and safety.</span><span></span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>To calculate the <span>percentage of total workforce represented in formal joint management-worker health and safety committees – </span></span><span>[[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/occupational-health-and-safety/Pages/G4-LA5.aspx |G4-LA5]]</span><span><span>-b: </span></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span></span><span>Identify formal health and safety committees that help monitor, collect feedback and advise on occupational safety programs. These committees may exist at the facility level or at multi-facility, region, group or organization levels</span></li>\r\n<li><span></span><span>Calculate the total number of workers represented by these committees, as a percentage of total workforce numbers</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Reporting on this Indicator should include the following contextual information as a comment to the metric value:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>G4-LA5-a: T<span>he level at which each formal joint management-worker health and safety committee typically operates within the organization.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "1-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 403 - Occupational Health and Safety",
        "GRI Standards+403-4 Worker participation, consultation, and communication on occupational health and safety"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 456,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 16,
      "companies": 329,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Number_of_labour_related_GRI_disclosures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Health_and_Safety_representation_G4_LA5_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 815203,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Worker fatalities, GRI 403-9 (formerly G4-LA6-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Worker_fatalities_GRI_403_9_formerly_G4_LA6_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Worker fatalities, GRI 403-9 (formerly G4-LA6-a)",
      "question": "How many workers died because of a work-related incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090317\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 403</a> addresses the topic of occupational health and safety. Healthy and safe work conditions are recognized as a human right and addressed in authoritative intergovernmental instruments, including those of the International Labour Organization (ILO), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and the World Health Organization (WHO).</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Healthy and safe work conditions involve both prevention of physical and mental harm, and promotion of workers’ health.  </p>\r\n<p>Prevention of harm and promotion of health require an organization to demonstrate commitment to workers' health and safety. They also require the organization to engage workers in the development, implementation, and performance evaluation of an occupational health and safety policy, management system and programs that are appropriate to the organization’s size and activities. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">G4-LA6 is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, and the new </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">GRI 403-9 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Worker_fatalities_G4_LA6_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the number of work-related fatalities by an organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Fatalities</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Accident</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Mortality</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- 403-9</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Companies may report fatalities as a rate rather than total number, please note that this metric is looking for the <strong>total number of fatalities</strong>. </p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "0,71"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 403 - Occupational Health and Safety",
        "GRI Standards+403-9 Work-related injuries",
        "GRI Standards+403-9-a-i Number and rate of fatalities as a result of work-related injury"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3597,
      "bookmarkers": 14,
      "datasets": 91,
      "companies": 1461,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Worker_fatalities_of_workforce.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Social_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2021+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/morespecificSylvia+Fatalities_and_injuries_no_change.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Employee_Deaths.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Worker_fatalities_GRI_403_9_formerly_G4_LA6_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 815318,
      "name": "Richard Mills+Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Total_Recordable_Incident_Rate_TRIR.json",
      "designer": "Richard Mills",
      "title": "Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR)",
      "question": "What is the company's Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/occupational-health-and-safety/Pages/G4-LA6.aspx | G4-LA6]] indicator from the Global Reporting Initiative's G4 specification.</p>\r\n<p>​Health and safety performance is a key measure of an organization’s duty of care. Low injury and absentee rates are generally linked to positive trends in staff morale and productivity. This Indicator shows whether health and safety management practices are resulting in fewer occupational health and safety incidents. An evaluation of trends and patterns may also indicate potential workplace inequity.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is based on the GRI G4 indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/occupational-health-and-safety/Pages/G4-LA6.aspx | G4-LA6]]. The GRI's [[http://database.globalreporting.org/search | Sustainability Disclosure Database]] is a good place to find companies that report according to the GRI standard. If you search for the company you want to research on this site, you should find a page like this that links to a HTM/PDF version of the company's report, and a link to an index that should tell you where data for each indicator can be found.</p>\r\n<p>Within the source document (usually a CSR report) there should be a clear statement or table entry reporting the reduction in energy consumption. You can often look up the indicator <strong>G4-LA6</strong> in the Global Reporting index of the CSR report to see which page you need to look at.</p>\r\n<p>The [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/occupational-health-and-safety/Pages/G4-LA6.aspx | G4-LA6]] indicator calls on companies to:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Report types of injury, injury rate (IR), occupational diseases rate (ODR), lost day rate (LDR), absentee rate (AR) and <strong>work-related fatalities,</strong> for the total workforce (that is, total employees plus supervised workers), by:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Region</li>\r\n<li>Gender</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Report types of injury, injury rate (IR), occupational diseases rate (ODR), lost day rate (LDR), absentee rate (AR) and work-related fatalities for independent contractors working on-site to whom the organization is liable for the general safety of the working environment, by:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Region</li>\r\n<li>Gender</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Report the system of rules applied in recording and reporting accident statistics.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>This metric is asking for the company's Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) - a standardised measure of workplace injuries used by many companies. </strong></p>\r\n<p> See [[http://www.bls.gov/iif/osheval.htm | this page]] for more information about how TRIR is calculated. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 11,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Total_Recordable_Incident_Rate_TRIR+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 826615,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 1), GRI 305-1-a (formerly G4-EN15-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Direct_greenhouse_gas_GHG_emissions_Scope_1_GRI_305_1_a_formerly_G4_EN15_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 1), GRI 305-1-a (formerly G4-EN15-a)",
      "question": "What is the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in tonnes of CO2 equivalent) that the organization is directly responsible for?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards).</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">G4-EN15-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span>, and the new </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">GRI 305-1</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span>. The </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <a href=\"/Direct_greenhouse_gas_GHG_emissions_Scope_1_G4_EN15_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water and ecosystems.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000089851\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 305</a> addresses emissions into air, which are the discharge of substances from a source into the atmosphere. Types of emissions include: greenhouse gas (GHG), ozone-depleting substances (ODS), and nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur oxides (SOX), among other significant air emissions.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">GHG emissions are a major contributor to climate change and are governed by the United Nations (UN) ‘Framework Convention on Climate Change’ and the subsequent UN ‘Kyoto Protocol’. This Standard covers the following GHGs:</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>Carbon dioxide (CO2)</li>\r\n<li>Methane (CH4)</li>\r\n<li>Nitrous oxide (N2O)</li>\r\n<li>Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)</li>\r\n<li>Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)</li>\r\n<li>Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)</li>\r\n<li>Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3)</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Some GHGs, including methane, are also air pollutants that have significant adverse impacts on ecosystems, air quality, agriculture, and human and animal health.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">As a result, different national and international regulations and incentive systems, such as emissions trading, aim to control the volume and reward the reduction of GHG emissions.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The GHG Protocol has established a classification of GHG emissions called ‘Scope’: Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3. The GHG emissions standard published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ‘ISO 14064’, represents these classifications of Scope with the following terms:</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>Direct GHG emissions (<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Scope 1</span>): GHG emissions from sources that are owned or controlled by an organization</li>\r\n<li>Energy indirect GHG emissions (<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Scope 2</span>): GHG emissions that result from the generation of purchased or acquired electricity, heating, cooling, and steam consumed by an organization</li>\r\n<li>Other indirect GHG emissions (<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Scope 3</span>): Indirect GHG emissions not included in energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions that occur outside of the organization, including both upstream and downstream emissions</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Instructions</strong></p>\r\n<p>To answer this metric question, identify the organization’s Direct GHG emissions (Scope 1) for a specific year.</p>\r\n<p>Start by looking for publicly available documents that may contain this information, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Annual Report (with Non-Financial Data)</li>\r\n<li>ESG Report</li>\r\n<li>Impact Report</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability Report</li>\r\n<li>Climate Disclosure</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\"><strong>Do NOT use the following reports:</strong></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Form 10-K</li>\r\n<li>Annual Information Form (if it contains only financial data)</li>\r\n<li>Interim Report</li>\r\n<li>Quarterly Report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">GHG</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Greenhouse Gas Emissions</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Scope 1</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">GRI</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">GRI Index</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">305-1</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">EN15</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If any calculations or unit conversions are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> where you found the answer.</span> Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Companies may report their GHG emissions in hundreds, thousands or millions of tonnes. <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Make sure you check the unit of measurement and enter the full number into the answer field</span>.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">E.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes CO2e' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500000 tonnes'<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://convertunits.com/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": " tonnes CO2 equivalent",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 305 - Emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-1-a Gross direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E1 - Climate Change",
        "ESRS Standards+E1.8 - Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 GHG emissions",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG3 - Good Health and Well-Being",
        "UN SDGs+SDG3.9 Reduce deaths and illnesses from hazardous chemicals and pollution of air, water, and soil.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.2 Achieve sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13: Climate Action",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13.2 Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG14 - Life Below Water"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5302,
      "bookmarkers": 101,
      "datasets": 153,
      "companies": 1581,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Combined_Scope_1_and_2_Greenhouse_Gas_emissions.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Progress_Scope_1_Emissions.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Environmental_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_1.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Emissions_and_Energy_Disclosure.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Wollongong_Research_Group_2020+Wollongong_2020_Climate_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Higher_School_of_Economics_Research_Group_2020+From_Farm_to_Fork_2020_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Emissions_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Laureen_van_Breen+Scope_1_GHG_over_number_of_employees.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Gershon_M_Bialer+CO2e_Intensity.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Greenhouse_gas_disclosure_rate_of_investees.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Scope_1_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Direct_greenhouse_gas_GHG_emissions_Scope_1_GRI_305_1_a_formerly_G4_EN15_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 826629,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 2), GRI 305-2 (formerly G4-EN16-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Indirect_greenhouse_gas_GHG_emissions_Scope_2_GRI_305_2_formerly_G4_EN16_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 2), GRI 305-2 (formerly G4-EN16-a)",
      "question": "What is the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in tons of CO2 equivalent) that the organization is indirectly responsible for?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards).</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">G4-EN16-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span>, and the new </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">GRI 305-2</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span>. The </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <a href=\"/Indirect_greenhouse_gas_GHG_emissions_Scope_2_G4_EN16_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water and ecosystems.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000089851\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 305</a> addresses emissions into air, which are the discharge of substances from a source into the atmosphere. Types of emissions include: greenhouse gas (GHG), ozone-depleting substances (ODS), and nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur oxides (SOX), among other significant air emissions.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">GHG emissions are a major contributor to climate change and are governed by the United Nations (UN) ‘Framework Convention on Climate Change’ and the subsequent UN ‘Kyoto Protocol’. This Standard covers the following GHGs:</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>Carbon dioxide (CO2)</li>\r\n<li>Methane (CH4)</li>\r\n<li>Nitrous oxide (N2O)</li>\r\n<li>Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)</li>\r\n<li>Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)</li>\r\n<li>Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)</li>\r\n<li>Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3)</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Some GHGs, including methane, are also air pollutants that have significant adverse impacts on ecosystems, air quality, agriculture, and human and animal health.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">As a result, different national and international regulations and incentive systems, such as emissions trading, aim to control the volume and reward the reduction of GHG emissions.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The GHG Protocol has established a classification of GHG emissions called ‘Scope’: Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3. The GHG emissions standard published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ‘ISO 14064’, represents these classifications of Scope with the following terms:</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>Direct GHG emissions (<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Scope 1</span>): GHG emissions from sources that are owned or controlled by an organization</li>\r\n<li>Energy indirect GHG emissions (<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Scope 2</span>): GHG emissions that result from the generation of purchased or acquired electricity, heating, cooling, and steam consumed by an organization</li>\r\n<li>Other indirect GHG emissions (<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Scope 3</span>): Indirect GHG emissions not included in energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions that occur outside of the organization, including both upstream and downstream emissions</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Instructions</strong></p>\r\n<p>To answer this metric question, you need to identify the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Indirect GHG emissions (Scope 2)</span> of the organization for a specific year.</p>\r\n<p>Start by looking for <span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>PUBLICLY AVAILABLE </strong></span>documents that may contain this information, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Annual Report (with Non-Financial Data)</li>\r\n<li>ESG Report</li>\r\n<li>Impact Report</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability Report</li>\r\n<li>Climate Disclosure</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\"><strong>Do NOT use the following reports:</strong></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Form 10-K</li>\r\n<li>Annual Information Form (if it contains only financial data)</li>\r\n<li>Interim Report</li>\r\n<li>Quarterly Report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric: </span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>GHG</li>\r\n<li>Emissions</li>\r\n<li>GRI</li>\r\n<li>GRI Index</li>\r\n<li>305-2 </li>\r\n<li>EN16</li>\r\n<li>Scope 2</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations: </span>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If any calculations or unit conversions are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> where you found the answer.</span> Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report their GHG emissions in hundreds, thousands or millions of tonnes. <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Make sure you check the unit of measurement and enter the full number into the answer field</span>.</p>\r\n<p>E.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes CO2e' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500000 tonnes'</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2 equivalent",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 305 - Emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-2-a Gross location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E1 - Climate Change",
        "ESRS Standards+E1.6 - Targets related to climate change",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG3 - Good Health and Well-Being",
        "UN SDGs+SDG3.9 Reduce deaths and illnesses from hazardous chemicals and pollution of air, water, and soil.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.4 Ensure environmentally sound management of chemicals and waste and reduce their release to air, water, and soil.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13: Climate Action",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13.2 Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5020,
      "bookmarkers": 57,
      "datasets": 142,
      "companies": 1547,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Combined_Scope_1_and_2_Greenhouse_Gas_emissions.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Environmental_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_2.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Emissions_and_Energy_Disclosure.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Wollongong_Research_Group_2020+Wollongong_2020_Climate_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Indirect_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_2_and_Scope_3_combined_per_Vehicle_Produced.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Emissions_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Gershon_M_Bialer+CO2e_Intensity.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Scope_2_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Indirect_greenhouse_gas_GHG_emissions_Scope_2_GRI_305_2_formerly_G4_EN16_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 828453,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Employees according to gender (G4-LA12)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Employees_according_to_gender_G4_LA12.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Employees according to gender (G4-LA12)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of female employees within the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers part of the requirements of [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/diversity-and-equal-opportunity/Pages/G4-LA12.aspx| G4-LA12]] - 'composition of governance bodies and breakdown of employees per employee category according to gender, age group, minority group membership, and other indicators of diversity'. This metric asks for percentage of total employees who are female.</p><p>This Indicator provides a quantitative measure of diversity within an organization and can be used in conjunction with sectoral or regional benchmarks. The level of diversity within an organization provides insights into the human capital of the organization. Comparisons between broad workforce diversity and management team diversity also offer information on equal opportunity. Detailed information on the composition of the workforce also helps in assessing which issues may be of particular relevance to certain segments of the workforce.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The total number of employees should match that reported in [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/general-standard-disclosures/strategy-and-profile/organizational-profile/Pages/G4-10.aspx| G4-10]] metric.</p>\r\n<p>To calculate the total percentage employees by gender - <span>[[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/diversity-and-equal-opportunity/Pages/G4-LA12.aspx| G4-LA12]]</span>-b:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span></span>Identify the total number of employees within each category by gender.</li>\r\n<li>Calculate percentage and include calculation in comments.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>For further Guidance see the [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/glossary/Pages/default.aspx#Employee-category| employee category]] definition. </p>\r\n<p>Include additional reported percentages (by employees per category) in the comments:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Age group: under 30 years old, 30-50 years old, over 50 years old</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Minority groups (E.g. Percentage of disabled employees)</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Other indicators of diversity where relevant</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see this [[http://wikirate.org/Researching_GRI_Metrics| page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><a href=\"#top\"> </a></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 258,
      "bookmarkers": 10,
      "datasets": 13,
      "companies": 152,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Employees_according_to_gender_G4_LA12+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 835304,
      "name": "Amnesty International+CMR Covers Copper",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Covers_Copper.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "CMR Covers Copper",
      "question": "Does the company's Conflict Minerals Report cover copper?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>Under US law, certain companies are required to file with the US Securities &amp; Exchange Commission (SEC) a report that describes their efforts to responsibly source tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold (3TG) from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries - called a \"Conflict Minerals Report\". If a company's Conflict Minerals Report also covers other minerals this would be a good sign that they take the issue seriously and are willing to go beyond the legal requirements. </span></p>\r\n<p><span>This metric is asking whether the company's Conflict Minerals Report covers copper.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Search the company's Conflict Minerals Report for the word \"copper\". If copper is mentioned, read the surrounding information to determine if copper is simply mentioned in passing (e.g. in the name of one of their smelters/refiners) or whether the company is taking steps to source copper responsibly.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>If it is clear that the company is taking steps to source copper responsibly, the answer for this metric is </span><strong>Yes</strong><span>.</span></li>\r\n<li><span>If copper is not mentioned or only in passing </span>enter <strong>No</strong> as the value.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 54,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 52,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Covers_Copper+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 835331,
      "name": "Amnesty International+CMR Area Covered",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Area_Covered.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "CMR Area Covered",
      "question": "What areas / countries does the company's Conflict Minerals Report cover?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies should be taking steps to source minerals responsibly. However, laws on responsible sourcing of minerals tend to focus on the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and its neighbouring countries. As a result, companies may focus their efforts on the DRC or adjoining/covered countries rather than other countries where the trade in minerals is linked to conflict and human rights abuses. If a company's responsible sourcing policy covers all conflict-affected and high-risk areas - as opposed to just the DRC or Covered Countries - this would be a good sign that they take the issue seriously and are willing to go beyond the legal requirements.</p>\r\n<p>[[https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2012/34-67716.pdf| Page 6]] of the SEC Dodd-Frank Act provides a definition of “adjoining country”; they are also listed in this metric under Methodology.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Identify what areas / countries the company's Conflict Minerals Report covers and select the relevant value from the list below:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>If the company says their due diligence only covers the Democratic Republic of Congo (</span><strong>DRC</strong><span>) that means they are doing less than the minimum requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act.</span></li>\r\n<li><span></span>If the company says their due diligence covers the DRC and its adjoining countries (<strong>DRC &amp;</strong> <strong>Covered Countries</strong>) they are in compliance with the Dodd-Frank Act. The term “adjoining country” is defined in Section 1502(e)(1) of the Act as a country that shares an internationally recognised border with the DRC, which presently includes Angola, Burundi, Central African Republic, the Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia. (Source: [[http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2012/34-67716.pdf|Securities and Exchange Commission]])</li>\r\n<li>If the company covers any country or area <strong>Beyond DRC &amp; Covered Countries</strong>, they are going beyond the minimum requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act. If so, please provide information about the additional areas covered as a comment on your metric value.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "DRC",
        "DRC & Covered Countries",
        "Beyond DRC & Covered Countries"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 58,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 53,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Area_Covered+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 835352,
      "name": "Amnesty International+Uses OECD Standard",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Uses_OECD_Standard.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "Uses OECD Standard",
      "question": "Does the company follow the OECD's guidance on due diligence and apply the 5 Step Framework?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies filing a Conflict Minerals Report must exercise due diligence on the source and chain of custody of their conflict minerals. The due diligence measures must conform to a nationally or internationally recognized due diligence framework, such as the due diligence guidance approved by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).</p><p>Companies filing a Conflict Minerals Report must exercise due diligence on the source and chain of custody of their conflict minerals. The due diligence measures must conform to a nationally or internationally recognized due diligence framework. At the moment, the only such framework is the Organisation\r\nfor Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) due diligence guidance.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) have published robust guidance on [[https://www.oecd.org/corporate/mne/GuidanceEdition2.pdf|Due Diligence for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]]. This guidance includes a <strong>5 Step Framework</strong> for structuring due diligence, the steps are as follows:</p><p>1.Establish Strong Company Management Systems</p><p>2.Identify and Assess Risk in the Supply Chain</p><p>3.Design and Implement a Strategy to Respond to Risks</p><p>4.Carry out Independent Third Party Audit of Supply Chain Due Diligence at Identified Points in the Supply Chain</p><p>5.Report on Supply Chain Due Diligence</p><p>Answer options:</p><ul><li><p><strong>Reports according to 5 Step Framework</strong> - where each of the OECD’s 5 steps appear within the report along with details of how the company applied each step.</p></li><li><p><strong>References OECD guidance</strong> - where the report references the OECD guidance but does not present information following the 5 Step structure (includes cases where some steps are detailed but not others).</p></li><li><p><strong>No</strong> - where the report does not reference the OECD guidance or 5 Step Framework</p></li></ul><p><strong>Tip:</strong> Search (ctrl-f) the company's Conflict Minerals Report for the terms OECD and/or Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, to find the section with relevant information.</p><p>Please add a comment which explains why you chose a particular answer.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No",
        "Reports according to 5 Step Framework",
        "References OECD Guidance"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 67,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 62,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Uses_OECD_Standard+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 835378,
      "name": "Amnesty International+CMR Area Avoidance",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Area_Avoidance.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "CMR Area Avoidance",
      "question": "Does the company avoid sourcing from the Democratic Republic of the Congo or Adjoining Countries entirely?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>One way that a company could comply with the Dodd-Frank Act is to avoid sourcing from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and adjoining/covered countries entirely. We regard this as a problematic approach because it has a damaging effect on the economy of the region. Ideally companies would still source from this region but take care not to source from smelters/refiners that buy raw materials from armed groups.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Identify if the company avoids sourcing from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and adjoining/covered countries entirely. </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>If the company states that none of the minerals in their supply chain originate in the DRC or adjoining/covered countries/region, or they provide a list of  country origins that doesn't include the above, their value should be <strong>Yes</strong>.</li>\r\n<li>If the company states that <span>minerals in their supply chain originate in the DRC or adjoining/covered countries/region, their value should be <strong>No</strong>.</span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 57,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 52,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Area_Avoidance+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 835388,
      "name": "Amnesty International+CMR Covers Human Rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Covers_Human_Rights.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "CMR Covers Human Rights",
      "question": "Does the company's Conflict Minerals Report cover Human Rights issues?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric determines whether companies have reported on whether they have complied with the Act's Statutory Provision of combatting Human Rights violations and abuses in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and any of the Covered Countries.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Identify if the <span>Conflict Minerals Report references the concept of Human Rights.</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>If it does, set the value to <strong>Yes</strong> and quote the relevant piece of the report as a comment on your metric value.</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Otherwise the value should be <strong>No</strong>.</span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 56,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 54,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Covers_Human_Rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 835399,
      "name": "Amnesty International+CMR Auditor of Smelters",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Auditor_of_Smelters.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "CMR Auditor of Smelters",
      "question": "Who carried out the audit of smelters/refiners in the company's supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Under the OECD Guidance, downstream companies are supposed to assess the due diligence practices of their smelters/ refiners. Some companies do conduct due diligence on their smelters /refiners, for example by conducting spot checks or site visits to smelters /refiners and reviewing incident reports to look out for risks linked to the smelters / refiners in their supply chain. Others have outsourced this responsibility entirely by relying on third party schemes such as the [[http://www.conflictfreesourcing.org/| Conflict Free Sourcing Initiative (CFSI)]]'s Conflict Free Smelter Program (CFSP) or the Global e-Sustainability Initiative, who check the due diligence practices of smelters / refiners. While companies can use these schemes as a tool to aid their due diligence, they should not be relying solely on them.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Under the OECD Guidance, downstream companies are supposed to assess the due diligence practices of their smelters/ refiners. Some companies do conduct due diligence on their smelters /refiners, for example by conducting spot checks or site visits to smelters /refiners and reviewing incident reports to look out for risks linked to the smelters / refiners in their supply chain. Others have outsourced this responsibility entirely by relying on third party schemes such as the [[http://www.conflictfreesourcing.org/| Conflict Free Sourcing Initiative (CFSI)]]'s Conflict Free Smelter Program (CFSP) or the Global e-Sustainability Initiative, who check the due diligence practices of smelters / refiners. While companies can use these schemes as a tool to aid their due diligence, they should not be relying solely on them.</p><p>Identify who carried out the audit of smelters/refiners in the company's supply chain. Determine whether the company relies on an external organisation or performs their due diligence in-house, and input the relevant value from the list below:</p><ul><li><p><strong>In-house</strong> - where the report describes the company conducting their own due diligence (e.g. through site visits, reviewing incident reports). For an example see [[http://images.apple.com/supplier-responsibility/pdf/Conflict_Minerals_Report_2016.pdf|Apple’s 2016 report]], which discusses how it reviews reports on incidents that may be linked to its smelters / refiners, conducts spot audits and engages directly with its smelters / refiners: page 4 “Further Due Diligence: Incident Review and Resolution” and page 5“Leveraging Expertise to Drive Desired Outcomes”.</p></li></ul><ul><li><p><strong>CFSI</strong> - where the report relies on the CFSI's Conflict Free Smelter Program (CFSP) for all due diligence assessment of smelters/refiners.</p></li><li><p><strong>Other</strong> - where the report relies on an external auditor that's not CFSI for all due diligence assessment of smelters/refiners. Please add the name(s) of these organisation(s) in the comments.</p></li><li><p><strong>CFSI plus other - </strong>where the report references CFSI but also an additional third-party auditor.</p></li><li><p>Where it is not reported set the value as <strong>Unknown</strong>.</p></li></ul><p><strong>Please add a comment </strong>which quotes relevant material from the conflict minerals report and/or explains why you gave the company a particular answer.</p><p><strong>Tip: </strong>Try searching (ctrl-f) for terms like “CFSI” and “Conflict Free Sourcing Initiative” within the report - many companies rely on the CFSI and where this term is mentioned the description of their due diligence is likely to be nearby.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "CFSI",
        "In-house",
        "Other",
        "CFSI plus other",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 61,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 56,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Auditor_of_Smelters+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 835416,
      "name": "Amnesty International+CMR Company Visits",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Company_Visits.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "CMR Company Visits",
      "question": "Has an employee or representative of the company visited any smelters/refiners?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Sending an employee to visit smelters/refiners in the company's supply chain is an indicator that the company takes their conflict minerals due diligence seriously.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Identify if an employee or representative of the company has visited any smelters/refiners. </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>If the Conflict Minerals Report mentions an employee or representative visiting smelters/refiners as part of the company's conflict minerals due diligence, set the value to <strong>Yes</strong>.</span></li>\r\n<li>Otherwise the value should be <strong>No</strong>.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 54,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 51,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Company_Visits+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 835427,
      "name": "Amnesty International+CMR Risk Management Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Risk_Management_Strategy.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "CMR Risk Management Strategy",
      "question": "Does the company have a strategy to identify and manage risks in relation to Conflict Minerals?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric asks whether the company identifies the steps it has taken or will take to identify, manage and/or mitigate its risks including any steps to improve due diligence.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Determine if the company has a strategy to<span> </span><span>identify and manage risks in relation to conflict minerals. Search the company's Conflict Minerals Report for keywords like \"risk\" or \"mitigation\".</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>If the company's Conflict Minerals Report outlines a clear strategy for identifying and managing risks in relation to Conflict Minerals, set their value to <strong>Yes</strong> and quote the relevant part of the CMR as a comment on your metric value.</li>\r\n<li>Otherwise the value should be <strong>No</strong>.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Risk_Management_Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 835436,
      "name": "Amnesty International+CMR Risks Identified",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Risks_Identified.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "CMR Risks Identified",
      "question": "How many risks related to conflict minerals did the company identify within its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Where the company has identified a number of concrete risks this can be taken as a sign that they are putting a genuine effort into their conflict minerals due diligence.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Determine how many risks related to conflict minerals the company identify within its supply chain, these may be reported individually or numerically.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Where this information is provided enter the <strong>number</strong> of risks identified.</span></li>\r\n<li><span></span>Where it is not reported set the value as <strong>Unknown</strong>.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Risks_Identified+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 835450,
      "name": "Amnesty International+CMR Risk Response",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Risk_Response.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "CMR Risk Response",
      "question": "Does the company have a strategy to respond to identified risks?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies may report on their strategy to identify and manage risks in relation to Conflict Minerals, as well as their strategies or action plans to <strong>respond</strong> to those identified risks.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Determine whether a company reports on its strategies to <strong>respond to</strong> or mitigate risks. <span>Include relevant quotes in the comments.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>Select:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span><span><strong>Yes</strong> - i</span>f they report on response approach. </span></li>\r\n<li><strong>No</strong> - if they report risks, but not response approach.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 38,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 38,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Risk_Response+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 835460,
      "name": "Amnesty International+CMR Lists Origin Countries",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Lists_Origin_Countries.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "CMR Lists Origin Countries",
      "question": "Does the company's Conflict Minerals Report list all of the countries where minerals originate from?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>According to the [[https://www.sec.gov/News/Article/Detail/Article/1365171562058| Dodd-Frank Act]] If the company's products rely on conflict minerals, the company must determine the origin of these minerals, and make any required disclosure regarding conflict minerals, for itself and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Check whether the company has reported <span>a list of the countries where minerals in their supply chain originate from. O</span><span><span>ften this is located in an annex (or a separate sustainability report, if referenced).</span></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span><span>Enter <strong>Yes </strong>w</span>here the list is provided.</span></li>\r\n<li><span><span>Enter <strong>No</strong> </span>where it is not reported.</span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 31,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 29,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Lists_Origin_Countries+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 835491,
      "name": "Amnesty International+CMR Smelters Identified",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Smelters_Identified.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "CMR Smelters Identified",
      "question": "How many smelters/refiners did the company identify in its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Under the US Dodd-Frank Act, companies are required to specify whether they deal with smelters/refiners in their supply chain, whether directly or indirectly.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Identify if the company has reported the number of smelters/refiners in its supply chain.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Enter this <strong>number</strong> as the value. If the value needed to be calculated please add methodology as a comment to the value.</span></li>\r\n<li><span></span>Where it is not reported set the value as <strong>Unknown</strong>.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 62,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 59,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Smelters_Identified+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 835501,
      "name": "Amnesty International+CMR Smelters Audited",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Smelters_Audited.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "CMR Smelters Audited",
      "question": "How many of the smelters/refiners identified in the company's supply chain have been audited or verified conflict free?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric follows the process presented under the [[http://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Smelters_Identified| CMR Smelters Identified]] metric. If the company has identified the number of smelters/refiners in its supply chain, they might also report on the number of audited or verified smelters/refiners determined as conflict-free.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>If the company has reported the number of smelters/refiners in its supply chain, sometimes they report the number <span>of these that have been audited or verified as conflict-free (often in a table within the report).</span><span> Identify if this has been reported.</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Where this information is provided enter the </span><strong>number </strong>that <span>have been audited or verified conflict free as the value.</span></li>\r\n<li>Where it is not reported set the value as <strong>Unknown.</strong></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 59,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 57,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Smelters_Audited+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 835992,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Environmental Non-Monetary Sanctions GRI 307-1 (formerly G4-EN29-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Non_Monetary_Sanctions_GRI_307_1_formerly_G4_EN29_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Environmental Non-Monetary Sanctions GRI 307-1 (formerly G4-EN29-a)",
      "question": "What is the total number of non-monetary sanctions for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations incurred by the organization? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/compliance/Pages/G4-EN29.aspx|G4-EN29]] – ‘Monetary value of significant fines and <strong>total number of non-monetary sanctions</strong> for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations’.</p><p>This Indicator is broader than depicted within the metric description. It also asks for G4-EN29-a – ‘Total monetary value of significant fines, cases brought through dispute resolution mechanisms’ - and G4-EN29-b - ‘Where organizations have not identified any non-compliance with laws or regulations, a brief statement of this fact is sufficient’.</p><p>The level of non-compliance within the organization helps indicate the ability of management to ensure that operations conform to certain performance parameters. From an economic perspective, ensuring compliance helps to reduce financial risks that occur either directly or indirectly. In some circumstances, non-compliance can lead to clean-up obligations or other costly environmental liabilities. The strength of the organization’s compliance record can also affect its ability to expand operations or gain permits.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the number of non-monetary sanctions for non-compliance with environmental laws the company has received:</strong></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.</p><ul><li><p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL F, Command F or search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p></li><li><p>Use G4 codes, G3 codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. G4-EN29 or EN29, non-compliance or non-monetary sanctions</p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value</p></li><li><p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><strong>Global Reporting Initiative compliance guidance for companies:</strong></p><p>To calculate the total number of non-monetary sanctions - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/compliance/Pages/G4-EN29.aspx|G4-EN29]]-a:</p><ul><li><p>Identify administrative or judicial sanctions for failure to comply with environmental laws and regulations, including, as a minimum:</p><ul><li><p>International declarations, conventions, and treaties, as well as national, sub-national, regional, and local regulations. Include non-compliances related to spills</p></li><li><p>Voluntary environmental agreements with regulating authorities that are considered binding and developed as a substitute for implementing new regulations. In certain jurisdictions, such agreements are referred to as ‘covenants’</p></li><li><p>Cases brought against the organization through the use of international dispute mechanisms or national dispute mechanisms supervised by government authorities</p></li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><p>Calculate the total number of non-monetary sanctions</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Global Reporting Initiative+Environmental Non-Monetary Sanctions GRI 307-1 (formerly G4-EN29-a)+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2183,
      "bookmarkers": 10,
      "datasets": 46,
      "companies": 900,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Non_Monetary_Sanctions_GRI_307_1_formerly_G4_EN29_a+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Non_Monetary_Sanctions_GRI_307_1_formerly_G4_EN29_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836037,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions intensity ratio (G4-EN18-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Greenhouse_Gas_GHG_emissions_intensity_ratio_G4_EN18_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions intensity ratio (G4-EN18-a)",
      "question": "What is the organization’s Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions intensity ratio? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator </span><span>[[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/emissions/Pages/G4-EN18.aspx | G4-EN18]]</span><span> - </span><span>‘Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions intensity ratio'.</span></p>\r\n<p>GHG emissions intensity expresses the GHG emissions per unit of activity, output, or any other organization-specific metric. Many organizations track environmental performance with intensity ratios. Intensity ratios are often called normalized environmental impact data. Intensity ratio defines an organization’s GHG emissions in the context of an organization-specific metric.</p>\r\n<p><span>Intensity ratio defines an organization’s GHG emissions in the context of an organization-specific metric. Intensity is calculated by dividing the absolute emissions (the numerator) by an organization-specific metric (the denominator).</span></p>\r\n<p><span></span>In combination with an organization’s absolute GHG emissions, GHG emissions intensity helps to contextualize the organization’s efficiency, including in relation to other organizations. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions intensity ratio:</strong></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.</p><ul><li><p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL F, Command F or search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p></li><li><p>Use G4 codes, G3 codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. G4-EN18 or EN18, GHG emissions or greenhouse gas emissions</p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value</p></li><li><p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><strong>Global Reporting Initiative compliance guidance for companies:</strong></p><p>To calculate GHG emissions intensity - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/emissions/Pages/G4-EN18.aspx | G4-EN18]]-a:</p><ul><li><p>Select an appropriate ratio denominator to represent the per-unit output, activity, or any other organization-specific metric</p></li><li><p>Calculate the intensity ratio by dividing the absolute emissions (the numerator) by the organization-specific metric (the denominator)</p></li></ul><p>Reporting on this Indicator should include the following contextual information as a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>G4-EN18-b: The organization-specific metric (the ratio denominator) chosen to calculate the ratio.</p></li><li><p>G4-EN18-c: The types of GHG emissions included in the intensity ratio: direct (Scope 1), energy indirect (Scope 2), other indirect (Scope 3).</p></li><li><p>G4-EN18-d: Gases included in the calculation.</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": ": 1",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 305 - Emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-4 GHG emissions intensity",
        "GRI Standards+305-4-a GHG emissions intensity ratio and its unit of measurement",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E1 - Climate Change",
        "ESRS Standards+E1.6 - Targets related to climate change"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 644,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 12,
      "companies": 297,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Greenhouse_Gas_GHG_emissions_intensity_ratio_G4_EN18_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836051,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Total Water Discharge, GRI 306-1 (formerly G4-EN22-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_Water_Discharge_GRI_306_1_formerly_G4_EN22_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Total Water Discharge, GRI 306-1 (formerly G4-EN22-a)",
      "question": "What is the organization's total volume of water discharge in cubic meters? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards).</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Metric is part of a standard set of indicators outlined in the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standard <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">(GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Guidelines</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The full set can be downloaded at</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric covering </span><em>Water discharge by quality and destination</em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, the code G4-EN22 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new code <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">GRI 306-1</span> is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Total%20water%20discharge%20(G4-EN22-a)%20Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"font-size: 15.2px; background-color: #ffffff;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water, and ecosystems. GRI 306 addresses the topic of effluents and waste. This includes water discharges; the generation, treatment and disposal of waste; and spills of chemicals, oils, fuels, and other substances.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about <strong>an organization’s impacts related to effluents and waste, and how it manages these impacts</strong>.</span> The unmanaged discharge of effluents with a high chemical or nutrient load (principally nitrogen, phosphorous, or potassium) can affect aquatic habitats, the quality of an available water supply, and an organization’s relationship with communities and other water users.</p>\r\n<p>The generation, treatment and disposal of waste – including its improper transportation – can also pose harm to human health and the environment. This is of particular concern if waste is transported to countries lacking the infrastructure and regulations to handle it.</p>\r\n<p>These concepts are covered by the Basel and Ramsar Conventions, and in key instruments of the International Maritime Organization. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question, you need to identify in </span><em style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">cubic meters</em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> the </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">total water discharge</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">reported by the organization for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. <br></span></p>\r\n<p>Start by looking for publicly available documents that may contain this information, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Annual Report (with Non-Financial Data)</li>\r\n<li>ESG Report</li>\r\n<li>Impact Report</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability Report</li>\r\n<li>Climate Disclosure</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\"><strong>Do NOT use the following reports</strong></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Form 10-K</li>\r\n<li>Annual Information Form (if it contains only financial data)</li>\r\n<li>Interim Report</li>\r\n<li>Quarterly Report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> and search terms: <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Water</span>, GRI, 306-1, Effluents, Waste</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">calculations or conversions </span>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report their water discharge in thousands or millions of cubic meters. Companies may also report using different units<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Make sure you check the unit of measurement and enter the full number into the answer field</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://convertunits.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 303 - Water and Effluents",
        "GRI Standards+303-4 Water discharge",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E3 - Water",
        "ESRS Standards+E3.4 - Water metrics",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6: Clean Water and Sanitation",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6.3 Improve water quality by reducing pollution, halving untreated wastewater, and increasing recycling and safe reuse.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG14 - Life Below Water",
        "UN SDGs+SDG14.1 Reduce marine pollution from land-based activities, including marine debris and nutrient pollution.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG15: Life on Land",
        "UN SDGs+SDG15.1 Protect and restore terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems, including forests and wetlands."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1662,
      "bookmarkers": 21,
      "datasets": 74,
      "companies": 628,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Higher_School_of_Economics_Research_Group_2020+From_Farm_to_Fork_2020_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_Water_Discharge_GRI_306_1_formerly_G4_EN22_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836066,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Female-to-Male basic salary ratio (G4-LA13-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Female_to_Male_basic_salary_ratio_G4_LA13_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Female-to-Male basic salary ratio (G4-LA13-a)",
      "question": "What is the ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men in the organization?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers part of the requirements of Indicator <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/equal-remuneration-for-women-and-men/Pages/G4-LA13.aspx\"><span>G4-LA13</span></a></span><span><span> </span></span><span>– ‘Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men by employee category, by significant locations of operation’. The indicator asks for additional information, not included in this metric, meaning the breakdown by employee category and significant location of operation, and the definition of used for ‘significant locations of operation’ (G4-LA13-b).</span></p>\r\n<p><span>Many countries have introduced legislation to enforce the principle of equal pay for work of equal value. This issue is supported by the International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention 100 ‘Equal Remuneration Convention’. Equality of remuneration is a factor in retaining qualified employees in the workforce. Where imbalances exist, an organization runs a risk to its reputation and legal challenges on the basis of discrimination.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>To calculate the ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men - </span><a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/equal-remuneration-for-women-and-men/Pages/G4-LA13.aspx\">G4-LA13</a><span>-a:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span></span><span>Identify the total number of employees in each employee category across the organization’s operations.</span></li>\r\n<li><span></span><span>Identify the basic salary for women and for men.</span></li>\r\n<li><span></span><span>Calculate the ratios of basic salary and remuneration of women to men.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Organizations reporting on this disclosure should include the definition used for'significant locations of operations' as a comment to the metric value.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 405 - Diversity and Equal Opportunity",
        "GRI Standards+405-2 Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men",
        "GRI Standards+405-2-a Ratio of basic salary and remuneration by employee category and location"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 524,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 15,
      "companies": 384,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Female_to_Male_basic_salary_ratio_G4_LA13_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836080,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Injury rate, GRI 403-9-a (formerly G4-LA6-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Injury_rate_GRI_403_9_a_formerly_G4_LA6_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Injury rate, GRI 403-9-a (formerly G4-LA6-a)",
      "question": "What is the workforce – total employees and supervised workers - injury rate? (Injuries per million hours worked)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090317\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 403</a> addresses the topic of occupational health and safety. Healthy and safe work conditions are recognized as a human right and addressed in authoritative intergovernmental instruments, including those of the International Labour Organization (ILO), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and the World Health Organization (WHO).</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Healthy and safe work conditions involve both prevention of physical and mental harm, and promotion of workers’ health.  </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Prevention of harm and promotion of health require an organization to demonstrate commitment to workers' health and safety. They also require the organization to engage workers in the development, implementation, and performance evaluation of an occupational health and safety policy, management system and programs that are appropriate to the organization’s size and activities. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In addition to preventing harm, an organization can promote workers’ health by offering healthcare services or voluntary health promotion services and programs, which, for example, help workers improve their diet or quit smoking. Data on work-related injuries are a measure of the extent of harm suffered by workers; they are not a measure of safety.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">G4-LA6 is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, and the new </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">GRI 403-9 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Injury_rates_G4_LA6_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the injury rate per million hours worked of an organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\"Lost time injury rates\" (LTIR) are <strong>not appropriate</strong> for this metric, this metric is about recording the </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><strong>total recordable injury frequency rate</strong></span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. If this is presented as a ratio other than \"per million hours worked\", please convert it to \"per million hours worked\".</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Injury / Injuries</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Accident</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Mortality</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- 403-9</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Units</strong></p>\r\n<p>This metric is asking you for an <strong>injury rate</strong>,<strong> not the total number of injuries</strong>. Companies may report their injury rate per 200,000 hours worked or 1 million hours worked. The answer for this metric must be entered into Wikirate in million hours worked. Make sure you check the unit of measurement and do any conversions necessary. </p>\r\n<p>E.g. If the company reports its injury rate as '5 injuries per 200,000 hours worked' the answer should be converted to million hours worked and entered on Wikirate as '25 injuries per million hours worked'</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "injuries per million hours worked",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 403 - Occupational Health and Safety",
        "GRI Standards+403-9 Work-related injuries",
        "GRI Standards+403-9-a Worker-relate injuries among employees and workers"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1618,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 51,
      "companies": 797,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Social_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/morespecificSylvia+Fatalities_and_injuries_no_change.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Injury_rate_GRI_403_9_a_formerly_G4_LA6_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836097,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Employees, GRI 102-8-a (formerly G4-10-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Employees_GRI_102_8_a_formerly_G4_10_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Employees, GRI 102-8-a (formerly G4-10-a)",
      "question": "What is the company's total number of employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this metric you need to find the \"Total number of employees\" (GRI 102-8-a). Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.</p>\r\n<p>Once you have found the answer, add the total number without commas to the answer field. If the organization provides useful context to the answer, such as an explanation of how the data have been compiled, and assumptions made, copy-paste this in the Comments field alongside the <strong>page number</strong> where you found the answer. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 2 - General Disclosures",
        "GRI Standards+2-7 Employees",
        "GRI Standards+2-7-a Total number of employees",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+S1 - Own Workforce",
        "ESRS Standards+S1.5 - Characteristics of the company's employees"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4684,
      "bookmarkers": 45,
      "datasets": 108,
      "companies": 1952,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Greenhouse_Gas_emissions_tons_per_employee.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Alex_H+Percentage_of_Permanent_Employees.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Number_of_labour_related_GRI_disclosures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Female_Workers.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Social_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Philipp_Kuehl+Groundwater_per_employees.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Employee.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Sussex_Research_Group+Diversity_Inclusion_Disclosure.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Higher_School_of_Economics_Research_Group_2020+From_Farm_to_Fork_2020_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2021+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Percentage_of_employees_that_are_temporary.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Gender_Career_Growth_Parity_Index.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Gender_Balance_Index_V2.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Number_of_employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Employees_GRI_102_8_a_formerly_G4_10_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836128,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Permanent employees, GRI 102-8-a (formerly G4-10-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Permanent_employees_GRI_102_8_a_formerly_G4_10_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Permanent employees, GRI 102-8-a (formerly G4-10-a)",
      "question": "What is the total number of employees with indefinite or permanent contacts? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">The GRI Standards are structured as a set of interrelated, modular standards. The full set can be downloaded at www.globalreporting.org/standards/. There are three universal Standards that apply to every organization preparing a sustainability report:</span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 101: Foundation</span></li>\r\n<li><a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1037/gri-102-general-disclosures-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 102: General Disclosures</span></a></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 103: Management Approach</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 102: General Disclosures, which this metric falls within,</span> provide an overview of an organization’s size, geographic location, and activities. This contextual information is important to help stakeholders understand the nature of the organization and its economic, environmental and social impacts.</p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #495057; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric (G4-10a) can be found </span><a href=\"/Employees_G4_10_a_Methodology\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #03998d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">here</span></a><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #495057; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this metric you need to find the \"Total number of <strong>permanent employees</strong>\" (GRI 102-8-a). Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong>: Once you have found the answer, add the total number without commas to the answer field. If the organization provides useful context to the answer, such as an explanation of how the data have been compiled, and assumptions made, copy-paste this in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 2 - General Disclosures",
        "GRI Standards+2-7 Employees",
        "GRI Standards+2-7-b-i Permanent employees",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+S1 - Own Workforce",
        "ESRS Standards+S1.5 - Characteristics of the company's employees"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2410,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 48,
      "companies": 1089,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Alex_H+Percentage_of_Permanent_Employees.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Number_of_labour_related_GRI_disclosures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Social_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2021+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Increased_temporary_employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Permanent_employees_GRI_102_8_a_formerly_G4_10_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836163,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Temporary employees, GRI 102-8-a (formerly G4-10-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Temporary_employees_GRI_102_8_a_formerly_G4_10_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Temporary employees, GRI 102-8-a (formerly G4-10-a)",
      "question": "What is the total number of employees with fixed term or temporary contacts? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">The GRI Standards are structured as a set of interrelated, modular standards. The full set can be downloaded at www.globalreporting.org/standards/. There are three universal Standards that apply to every organization preparing a sustainability report:</span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 101: Foundation</span></li>\r\n<li><a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1037/gri-102-general-disclosures-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 102: General Disclosures</span></a></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 103: Management Approach</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 102: General Disclosures, which this metric falls within,</span> provide an overview of an organization’s size, geographic location, and activities. This contextual information is important to help stakeholders understand the nature of the organization and its economic, environmental and social impacts.</p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #495057; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric (G4-10a) can be found </span><a href=\"/Employees_G4_10_a_Methodology\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #03998d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">here</span></a><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #495057; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this metric you need to find the \"Total number of <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">temporary employees</span>\" (GRI 102-8-a). Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, add the total number without commas to the answer field. If the organization provides useful context to the answer, such as an explanation of how the data have been compiled, and assumptions made, copy-paste this in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Temporary Work",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 2 - General Disclosures",
        "GRI Standards+2-7 Employees",
        "GRI Standards+2-7-b-ii Temporary employees",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+S1 - Own Workforce",
        "ESRS Standards+S1.5 - Characteristics of the company's employees"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2146,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 37,
      "companies": 954,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Number_of_labour_related_GRI_disclosures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Social_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Percentage_of_employees_that_are_temporary.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Yearly_change_temporary_workers.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Increase_in_temporary_workers.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Increased_temporary_employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Temporary_employees_GRI_102_8_a_formerly_G4_10_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836246,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Hazardous Waste Created, GRI 306-2 (formerly G4-EN23-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Hazardous_Waste_Created_GRI_306_2_formerly_G4_EN23_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Hazardous Waste Created, GRI 306-2 (formerly G4-EN23-a)",
      "question": "What is the total amount of hazardous waste created by the organization (in metric tonnes)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The full set can be downloaded at </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-EN23-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">code</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">306-2 </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><em>Waste by type and disposal method</em></span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Waste_Generated_Recycled_EN23_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"font-size: 1rem; background-color: #ffffff;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water, and ecosystems.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090313\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 306</a> addresses the topic of <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">effluents and waste</span>. This includes water discharges; the generation, treatment and disposal of waste; and spills of chemicals, oils, fuels, and other substances.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The generation, treatment and disposal of waste – including its improper transportation – can pose harm to human health and the environment. This is of particular concern if waste is transported to countries lacking the infrastructure and regulations to handle it.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to effluents and waste, and how it manages these impacts.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question you need to identify the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">total hazardous waste created (in </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bold;\">tonnes)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> by the organization </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p>Start by looking for <span style=\"color: #000000;\">publicly available </span>documents that may contain this information, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Annual Report (with Non-Financial Data)</li>\r\n<li>ESG Report</li>\r\n<li>Impact Report</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability Report</li>\r\n<li>Climate Disclosure</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\"><strong>Do NOT use the following reports</strong></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Form 10-K</li>\r\n<li>Annual Information Form (if it contains only financial data)</li>\r\n<li>Interim Report</li>\r\n<li>Quarterly Report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> &amp; search terms: Hazardous,<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Waste</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, GRI, 306-2, EN23</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">calculations or conversions </span>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report the <em>volume</em> in thousands of cubic metres, or using a unit other than cubic meters. If this is the case, convert units to cubic meters (see website below), or add the number of zeros indicated, and fill in the total number in the answer field - e.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500000'. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://convertunits.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 306 - Waste 2020",
        "GRI Standards+306-4 Waste diverted from disposal",
        "GRI Standards+306-4-b Total weight of hazardous waste diverted from disposal",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E5 - Resource Use & Circular Economy"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3296,
      "bookmarkers": 23,
      "datasets": 102,
      "companies": 1156,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Environmental_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Percentage_hazardous_waste_recycled.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Higher_School_of_Economics_Research_Group_2020+From_Farm_to_Fork_2020_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Hazardous_Waste_Created_GRI_306_2_formerly_G4_EN23_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836262,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Non-Hazardous Waste, GRI 306-2 (formerly G4-EN23-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Non_Hazardous_Waste_GRI_306_2_formerly_G4_EN23_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Non-Hazardous Waste, GRI 306-2 (formerly G4-EN23-a)",
      "question": "What is the total amount of non-hazardous waste created by the organization (in metric tonnes)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The full set can be downloaded at </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-EN23-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">code</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">306-2 </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><em>Waste by type and disposal method</em></span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Waste_Generated_Recycled_EN23_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"font-size: 1rem; background-color: #ffffff;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water, and ecosystems.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090313\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 306</a> addresses the topic of <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">effluents and waste</span>. This includes water discharges; the generation, treatment and disposal of waste; and spills of chemicals, oils, fuels, and other substances.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The generation, treatment and disposal of waste – including its improper transportation – can pose harm to human health and the environment. This is of particular concern if waste is transported to countries lacking the infrastructure and regulations to handle it.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to effluents and waste, and how it manages these impacts.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question, you need to identify the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">total non-hazardous waste created (in tonnes)</span> by the organization <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p>Start by looking for publicly available documents that may contain this information, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Annual Report (with Non-Financial Data)</li>\r\n<li>ESG Report</li>\r\n<li>Impact Report</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability Report</li>\r\n<li>Climate Disclosure</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\"><strong>Do NOT use the following reports</strong></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Form 10-K</li>\r\n<li>Annual Information Form (if it contains only financial data)</li>\r\n<li>Interim Report</li>\r\n<li>Quarterly Report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> &amp; search terms: Non-hazardous,<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Waste,</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> GRI, 306-2, EN23</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">calculations or conversions </span>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report the <em>volume</em> in thousands of cubic metres, or using a unit other than cubic meters. If this is the case, convert units to cubic meters (see website below), or add the number of zeros indicated, and fill in the total number in the answer field - e.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500000'. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://convertunits.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 306 - Waste 2020",
        "GRI Standards+306-3 Waste generated",
        "GRI Standards+306-4 Waste diverted from disposal",
        "GRI Standards+306-4-c Total weight of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3032,
      "bookmarkers": 15,
      "datasets": 87,
      "companies": 1069,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Environmental_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Percentage_non_hazardous_waste_recycled.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Non_Hazardous_Waste_GRI_306_2_formerly_G4_EN23_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836274,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Hazardous Waste Recycled, GRI 306-2-a (formerly G4-EN23-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Hazardous_Waste_Recycled_GRI_306_2_a_formerly_G4_EN23_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Hazardous Waste Recycled, GRI 306-2-a (formerly G4-EN23-a)",
      "question": "What is the total amount of hazardous waste recycled by the organization (in metric tonnes)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The full set can be downloaded at </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-EN23-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">code</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">306-2 </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><em>Waste by type and disposal method</em></span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Waste_Generated_Recycled_EN23_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"font-size: 1rem; background-color: #ffffff;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water, and ecosystems.</p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090313\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 306</a> addresses the topic of <strong>effluents and waste</strong>. This includes water discharges; the generation, treatment and disposal of waste; and spills of chemicals, oils, fuels, and other substances.</p>\r\n<p>The generation, treatment and disposal of waste – including its improper transportation – can also pose harm to human health and the environment. This is of particular concern if waste is transported to countries lacking the infrastructure and regulations to handle it.</p>\r\n<p>The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to effluents and waste, and how it manages these impacts.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question you need to identify the <strong>total tonnes of hazardous waste recycled</strong> by the organization <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p>Start by looking for publicly available documents that may contain this information, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Annual Report (with Non-Financial Data)</li>\r\n<li>ESG Report</li>\r\n<li>Impact Report</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability Report</li>\r\n<li>Climate Disclosure</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\"><strong>Do NOT use the following reports</strong></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Form 10-K</li>\r\n<li>Annual Information Form (if it contains only financial data)</li>\r\n<li>Interim Report</li>\r\n<li>Quarterly Report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> &amp; search terms: Hazardous,<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Waste,</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Recycle, GRI, 306-2, EN23</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">calculations or conversions </span>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report the <em>volume</em> in thousands of cubic metres, or using a unit other than cubic meters. If this is the case, convert units to cubic meters (see website below), or add the number of zeros indicated, and fill in the total number in the answer field - e.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500000'. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://convertunits.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 306 - Waste 2020",
        "GRI Standards+306-4 Waste diverted from disposal",
        "GRI Standards+306-4-c-ii Weight of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal by recovery operation: Recycling",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E5 - Resource Use & Circular Economy",
        "ESRS Standards+E5.5 - Resource outflows"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2828,
      "bookmarkers": 26,
      "datasets": 82,
      "companies": 1099,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Percentage_hazardous_waste_recycled.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Hazardous_Waste_Recycled_GRI_306_2_a_formerly_G4_EN23_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836299,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Human Rights Impacts Grievances filed (G4-HR12-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Human_Rights_Impacts_Grievances_filed_G4_HR12_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Human Rights Impacts Grievances filed (G4-HR12-a)",
      "question": "What is the total number of grievances about human rights impacts filed through the organization's formal grievance mechanisms?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span></span><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. </span> It covers one of the requirements of Indicator<span> </span><span>[[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/human-rights/human-rights-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-HR12.aspx| G4-HR12]]</span><span> -  ‘</span><span>Number of grievances about human rights impacts <strong>filed</strong>, addressed, and resolved through formal grievance mechanisms'. </span>This disclosure is broader than depicted within the metric description. It also asks for:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>G4-HR12-a: Total number of grievances about human rights impacts </span><strong>filed</strong><span> through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period.</span></li>\r\n<li><span>G4-HR12-b: Of the identified grievances, how many were:</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span>                    Addressed during the reporting period<br>                  <strong>  </strong>Resolved during the reporting period</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>G4-HR12-c: Total number of grievances about human rights impacts filed prior to the reporting period that were resolved during the reporting period.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span>Disputes may occur over the human rights impacts of an organization’s activities and relationships with others (such as entities in the supply chain). Effective grievance mechanisms play an important role in the successful protection of human rights.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the total number of grievances about human rights impacts filed through the organization's formal grievance mechanisms:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.</p><ul><li><p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL F, Command F or search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p></li><li><p>Use G4 codes, G3 codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. G4-HR12 or HR12, Human Rights violations or grievances filed</p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value</p></li><li><p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p></p><p><strong>Global Reporting Initiative compliance guidance for companies:</strong><br>To calculate the total number of grievances about human rights impacts filed through the organization's formal grievance mechanisms - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/human-rights/human-rights-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-HR12.aspx|G4-HR12]]-a:</p><ul><li><p>​Identify existing formal grievance mechanisms. Formal grievance mechanisms may be managed by the reporting organization or by an external party.</p></li><li><p>Identify the total number of grievances about human rights impact filed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period.</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "grievances",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2258,
      "bookmarkers": 12,
      "datasets": 47,
      "companies": 1106,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Human_Rights_Impacts_Grievances_filed_G4_HR12_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836314,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Incidents of discrimination, GRI 406-1 (G4-HR3-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Incidents_of_discrimination_GRI_406_1_G4_HR3_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Incidents of discrimination, GRI 406-1 (G4-HR3-a)",
      "question": "What is the total number of incidents of discrimination reported by the organization during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s<br>impacts on the social systems within which it operates.</p>\r\n<p>[[https://wikirate.org/Source_000090320|GRI 406]] addresses the topic of non-discrimination. For the purpose of this Standard,<strong> discrimination is defined as the act and the result of treating people unequally by imposing unequal burdens or denying benefits, instead of treating each person fairly on the basis of individual merit.</strong></p>\r\n<p>Discrimination can also include harassment. This is defined as a course of comments or actions that are unwelcome, or should reasonably be known to be unwelcome, to the person towards whom they are addressed.</p>\r\n<p>According to ILO instruments, discrimination can occur on the grounds of race, color, sex, religion,<br>political opinion, national extraction, and social origin. Discrimination can also occur based on factors such<br>as age, disability, migrant status, HIV and AIDS, gender, sexual orientation, genetic predisposition, and lifestyles,<br>among others.</p>\r\n<p>An organization is expected to avoid discriminating against any person on any grounds, including avoiding discrimination against workers at work. It is also expected to avoid discriminating against customers with respect to the provision of products and services, or against any other stakeholder, including suppliers or business partners.</p>\r\n<p>The presence and effective implementation of policies to avoid discrimination are a basic expectation of socially responsible conduct.</p>\r\n<hr>\r\n<p><em>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-HR3-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 406-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found here. code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found [[https://wikirate.org/Incidents%20of%20discrimination%20(G4-HR3-a)%20Methodology|here]].</em></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is looking for the <strong>total number of incidents of discrimination occurred</strong> for the reporting period. <strong><br></strong></p>\r\n<p>In the context of this disclosure, an ‘incident’ refers to a legal action or complaint registered with the reporting<br>organization or competent authorities through a formal process, or an instance of non-compliance identified by the organization through established procedures. Established procedures to identify instances of noncompliance can include management system audits,formal monitoring programs, or grievance mechanisms.</p>\r\n<p>An incident is no longer subject to action if it is resolved, the case is completed, or no further action is required by the organization. For example, an incident for which no further action is required can include cases that were withdrawn or where the underlying circumstances that led to the incident no longer exist.</p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate researchers: </strong></p>\r\n<p>To calculate the total number of incidents of discrimination that occured during the reporting period :</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Identify incidents of discrimination on grounds of race, color, sex, religion, political opinion, national extraction, or social origin as defined by the ILO, or other relevant forms of discrimination involving internal and external stakeholders across operations in the reporting period.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL+F, Command+F or the search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Use the codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. G4-406 or 406, incidents of discrimination</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>Select the '<strong><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\">Unknown</span></strong>' answer box if the company has not published the data.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "incidents",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 406 - Non-discrimination",
        "GRI Standards+406-1 Incidents of discrimination and corrective actions taken",
        "GRI Standards+406-1-a Number of incidents of discrimination during the reporting period",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5.1 End all forms of discrimination against women and girls everywhere.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.8 Protect labour rights and ensure safe, secure working environments for all workers, including migrants."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3570,
      "bookmarkers": 19,
      "datasets": 105,
      "companies": 1422,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Social_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Incidents_of_discrimination_per_employee.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Sussex_Research_Group+Diversity_Inclusion_Disclosure.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2021+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Reported_Incidents_of_Discrimination.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Incidents_of_discrimination_GRI_406_1_G4_HR3_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836608,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Emissions of Ozone-Depleting Substances (ODS), GRI 305-6-a (formerly G4-EN20-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Emissions_of_Ozone_Depleting_Substances_ODS_GRI_305_6_a_formerly_G4_EN20_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Emissions of Ozone-Depleting Substances (ODS), GRI 305-6-a (formerly G4-EN20-a)",
      "question": "How many metric tons of Ozone-Depleting Substances did the company emit (in metric tons of CFC-11 equivalent)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The full set can be downloaded at</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric covering </span><em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Emissions of ozone-depleting substances (ODS), </span></em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">among other significant air emissions</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, the code G4-EN20 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new code <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">GRI 305-6</span> is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Emissions_of_Ozone_Depleting_Substances_ODS_G4_EN20_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"font-size: 15.2px; background-color: #ffffff;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water and ecosystems. <a href=\"/Source_000089851\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 305</a> addresses emissions into air, which are the discharge of substances from a source into the atmosphere. Types of emissions include: greenhouse gas (GHG), <strong>ozone-depleting substances</strong> (ODS), and nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur oxides (SOX), among other significant air emissions.</p>\r\n<p>Ozone-depleting substances (ODS)The ozone layer filters out most of the sun’s biologically harmful ultraviolet (UV-B) radiation. Observed and projected ozone depletion due to ODS generates worldwide concern. The UN Environment Programme (UNEP) ‘Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer’ (‘Montreal Protocol’) regulates the phase-out of ODS internationally.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question, identify the total <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">total emissions of ozone-depleting subtances (ODS)</span> in metric tons, reported by the organization <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> and search terms: ODS, Emissions, , Ozone, EN20, GRI, 305-6</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 305 - Emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-6 Emissions of ozone-depleting substances (ODS)",
        "GRI Standards+305-6-a Production, imports, and exports of ozone-depleting substances (ODS)",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG3 - Good Health and Well-Being",
        "UN SDGs+SDG3.9 Reduce deaths and illnesses from hazardous chemicals and pollution of air, water, and soil.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.4 Ensure environmentally sound management of chemicals and waste and reduce their release to air, water, and soil."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 723,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 16,
      "companies": 525,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Emissions_of_Ozone_Depleting_Substances_ODS_GRI_305_6_a_formerly_G4_EN20_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836651,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Sulfur Oxide (SOx) emissions, GRI 305-7-a (formerly G4-EN21-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Sulfur_Oxide_SOx_emissions_GRI_305_7_a_formerly_G4_EN21_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Sulfur Oxide (SOx) emissions, GRI 305-7-a (formerly G4-EN21-a)",
      "question": "How many metric tonnes of sulfur oxide (SOx) does the company emit?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards).</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Metric is part of a standard set of indicators outlined in the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standard <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">(GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Guidelines</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The full set can be downloaded at</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric covering </span><em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur oxides (SOX), among other significant air emissions</span></em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, the code G4-EN21 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new code <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">GRI 305-7</span> is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Nitrogen%20oxides%20(NOX),%20sulfur%20oxides%20(SOX),%20and%20other%20significant%20air%20emissions%20G4%20EN21%20Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water and ecosystems. GRI 305 addresses emissions into air, which are the discharge of substances from a source into the atmosphere. Types of emissions include: greenhouse gas (GHG), ozone-depleting substances (ODS), and nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur oxides (SOX), among other significant air emissions.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Pollutants such as NOX and SOX have adverse effects on climate, ecosystems, air quality, habitats, agriculture, and human and animal health</span>. Deterioration of air quality, acidification, forest degradation and public health concerns have led to local and international regulations to control emissions of these pollutants.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Reductions in the emission of regulated pollutants lead to improved health conditions for workers and local communities and can enhance relations with affected stakeholders. In regions with emission caps, the volume of emissions also has direct cost implications.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Other significant air emissions include, for example, persistent organic pollutants or particulate matter, as well as air emissions that are regulated under international conventions and/or national laws or regulations, including those listed on an organization’s environmental permits.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question you need to identify in <em>tonnes</em>, the amount of <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">SOX</span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> emissions </span>reported by the organization <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p>Start by looking for publicly available documents that may contain this information, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Annual Report (with Non-Financial Data)</li>\r\n<li>ESG Report</li>\r\n<li>Impact Report</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability Report</li>\r\n<li>Climate Disclosure</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\"><strong>Do NOT use the following reports</strong></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Form 10-K</li>\r\n<li>Annual Information Form (if it contains only financial data)</li>\r\n<li>Interim Report</li>\r\n<li>Quarterly Report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> and search terms: SOx, GRI, 305-7, Emissions, Pollutants</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">calculations or conversions </span>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report their SOx emissions in thousands or millions of tonnes. Companies may also report using different units, such as <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">kilos rather than tonnes. </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Make sure you check the unit of measurement and enter the full number into the answer field</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">E.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes SOx' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500,000 tonnes'. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://convertunits.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 305 - Emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-7 Nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and other significant air emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-7-a Significant air emissions by category",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E2 - Pollution",
        "ESRS Standards+E2.4 - Pollution of air, water and soil"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3090,
      "bookmarkers": 19,
      "datasets": 83,
      "companies": 1110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Emissions_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Sulfur_Oxide_SOx_emissions_GRI_305_7_a_formerly_G4_EN21_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836686,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Persistent organic pollutants (POP), GRI 305-7-a (formerly G4-EN21-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Persistent_organic_pollutants_POP_GRI_305_7_a_formerly_G4_EN21_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Persistent organic pollutants (POP), GRI 305-7-a (formerly G4-EN21-a)",
      "question": "How many metric tonnes of persistent organic pollutants (POP) does the company emit?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards).</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Metric is part of a standard set of indicators outlined in the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standard <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">(GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Guidelines</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The full set can be downloaded at</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric covering </span><em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur oxides (SOX), among other significant air emissions</span></em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, the code G4-EN21 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new code <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">GRI 305-7</span> is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Nitrogen%20oxides%20(NOX),%20sulfur%20oxides%20(SOX),%20and%20other%20significant%20air%20emissions%20G4%20EN21%20Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water and ecosystems. GRI 305 addresses emissions into air, which are the discharge of substances from a source into the atmosphere. Types of emissions include: greenhouse gas (GHG), ozone-depleting substances (ODS), and nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur oxides (SOX), among other significant air emissions.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Pollutants such as NOX and SOX have adverse effects on climate, ecosystems, air quality, habitats, agriculture, and human and animal health</span>. Deterioration of air quality, acidification, forest degradation and public health concerns have led to local and international regulations to control emissions of these pollutants.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Reductions in the emission of regulated pollutants lead to improved health conditions for workers and local communities and can enhance relations with affected stakeholders. In regions with emission caps, the volume of emissions also has direct cost implications.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Other significant air emissions include, for example, persistent organic pollutants or particulate matter, as well as air emissions that are regulated under international conventions and/or national laws or regulations, including those listed on an organization’s environmental permits.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question you need to identify in </span><em style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">tonnes</em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, the amount of <strong>P</strong></span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">ersistent Organic Pollutants (POP)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\"> emissions </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">reported by the organization for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> and search terms: <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">persistent organic pollutants, POP</span>, GRI, 305-7, Emissions, Pollutants</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">calculations or conversions </span>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report their POP emissions in thousands or millions of tonnes. Companies may also report using different units, such as <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">kilos rather than tonnes. </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Make sure you check the unit of measurement and enter the full number into the answer field</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">E.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes POPs' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500,000 tonnes'. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://convertunits.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 305 - Emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-7 Nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and other significant air emissions",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E2 - Pollution",
        "ESRS Standards+E2.4 - Pollution of air, water and soil",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.4 Ensure environmentally sound management of chemicals and waste and reduce their release to air, water, and soil.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13: Climate Action",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13.2 Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2099,
      "bookmarkers": 6,
      "datasets": 39,
      "companies": 920,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Persistent_organic_pollutants_POP_GRI_305_7_a_formerly_G4_EN21_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836736,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) emissions, GRI 305-7-a (formerly G4-EN21-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Hazardous_Air_Pollutant_HAP_emissions_GRI_305_7_a_formerly_G4_EN21_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) emissions, GRI 305-7-a (formerly G4-EN21-a)",
      "question": "How many metric tonnes of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) does the company emit?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards).</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Metric is part of a standard set of indicators outlined in the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standard <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">(GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Guidelines</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The full set can be downloaded at</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric covering </span><em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur oxides (SOX), among other significant air emissions</span></em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, the code G4-EN21 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new code <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">GRI 305-7</span> is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Nitrogen%20oxides%20(NOX),%20sulfur%20oxides%20(SOX),%20and%20other%20significant%20air%20emissions%20G4%20EN21%20Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water and ecosystems. GRI 305 addresses emissions into air, which are the discharge of substances from a source into the atmosphere. Types of emissions include: greenhouse gas (GHG), ozone-depleting substances (ODS), and nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur oxides (SOX), among other significant air emissions.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Pollutants such as NOX and SOX have adverse effects on climate, ecosystems, air quality, habitats, agriculture, and human and animal health</span>. Deterioration of air quality, acidification, forest degradation and public health concerns have led to local and international regulations to control emissions of these pollutants.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Reductions in the emission of regulated pollutants lead to improved health conditions for workers and local communities and can enhance relations with affected stakeholders. In regions with emission caps, the volume of emissions also has direct cost implications.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Other significant air emissions include, for example, persistent organic pollutants or particulate matter, as well as air emissions that are regulated under international conventions and/or national laws or regulations, including those listed on an organization’s environmental permits.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question you need to identify in </span><em style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">tonnes</em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, the amount of </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">hazardous air pollutant (HAP)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\"> emissions </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">reported by the organization for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> and search terms: hazardous air<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> pollutants, HAP</span>, GRI, 305-7, Emissions, Pollutants</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">calculations or conversions </span>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report their  HAP emissions in thousands or millions of tonnes. Companies may also report using different units, such as <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">kilos rather than tonnes. </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Make sure you check the unit of measurement and enter the full number into the answer field</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">E.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes HAPs' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500,000 tonnes'. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://convertunits.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 305 - Emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-7 Nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and other significant air emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-7-a Significant air emissions by category",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG3 - Good Health and Well-Being",
        "UN SDGs+SDG3.9 Reduce deaths and illnesses from hazardous chemicals and pollution of air, water, and soil.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.4 Ensure environmentally sound management of chemicals and waste and reduce their release to air, water, and soil.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13: Climate Action",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13.2 Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2068,
      "bookmarkers": 11,
      "datasets": 38,
      "companies": 923,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Hazardous_Air_Pollutant_HAP_emissions_GRI_305_7_a_formerly_G4_EN21_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836772,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Human Rights Impacts Grievances addressed (G4-HR12-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Human_Rights_Impacts_Grievances_addressed_G4_HR12_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Human Rights Impacts Grievances addressed (G4-HR12-b)",
      "question": "Of the total number of grievances about human rights impacts filed, how many were addressed during the reporting period?\r\n \r\n ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/human-rights/human-rights-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-HR12.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-HR12</a> -  ‘Number of grievances about human rights impacts filed, <strong>addressed</strong>, and resolved through formal grievance mechanisms’. This disclosure is broader than depicted within the metric description. It also asks for:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>G4-HR12-a: Total number of grievances about human rights impacts filed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period.</span></li>\r\n<li><span>G4-HR12-b: Of the identified grievances, how many were:</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span>                    <strong>Addressed during the reporting period</strong><br>                    Resolved during the reporting period</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>G4-HR12-c: Total number of grievances about human rights impacts filed prior to the reporting period that were resolved during the reporting period.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Disputes may occur over the human rights impacts of an organization’s activities and relationships with others (such as entities in the supply chain). Effective grievance mechanisms play an important role in the successful protection of human rights.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>​<span>To calculate </span>the total number grievances about human rights impacts addressed during the reporting period - <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/human-rights/human-rights-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-HR12.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-HR12</a><span></span><span>-b:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>​Identify existing formal grievance mechanisms. Formal grievance mechanisms may be managed by the reporting organization or by an external party.</li>\r\n<li>Identify the total number of grievances about human rights impact filed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period.</li>\r\n<li>Identify the total number of grievances addressed during the reporting period from prior year grievance filings.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "grievances",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institution",
        "UN SDGs+SDG16.3 Promote the rule of law and ensure equal access to justice for all."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 594,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 23,
      "companies": 411,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Human_Rights_Impacts_Grievances_addressed_G4_HR12_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836794,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Particulate Matter (PM) emissions, GRI 305-7-a (formerly G4-EN21-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Particulate_Matter_PM_emissions_GRI_305_7_a_formerly_G4_EN21_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Particulate Matter (PM) emissions, GRI 305-7-a (formerly G4-EN21-a)",
      "question": "How many metric tonnes of particulate matter (PM) does the company emit?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards).</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Metric is part of a standard set of indicators outlined in the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standard <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">(GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Guidelines</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The full set can be downloaded at</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric covering </span><em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur oxides (SOX), among other significant air emissions</span></em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, the code G4-EN21 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new code <a href=\"/Source_000089851\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">GRI 305-7</span></a> is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Nitrogen%20oxides%20(NOX),%20sulfur%20oxides%20(SOX),%20and%20other%20significant%20air%20emissions%20G4%20EN21%20Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water and ecosystems. GRI 305 addresses emissions into air, which are the discharge of substances from a source into the atmosphere. Types of emissions include: greenhouse gas (GHG), ozone-depleting substances (ODS), and nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur oxides (SOX), among other significant air emissions.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Pollutants such as NOX and SOX have adverse effects on climate, ecosystems, air quality, habitats, agriculture, and human and animal health</span>. Deterioration of air quality, acidification, forest degradation and public health concerns have led to local and international regulations to control emissions of these pollutants.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Reductions in the emission of regulated pollutants lead to improved health conditions for workers and local communities and can enhance relations with affected stakeholders. In regions with emission caps, the volume of emissions also has direct cost implications.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Other significant air emissions include, for example, persistent organic pollutants or particulate matter, as well as air emissions that are regulated under international conventions and/or national laws or regulations, including those listed on an organization’s environmental permits.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question you need to identify in <em>tonnes</em>, the amount of <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Particulate Matter (PM)</span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> emissions </span>reported by the organization <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> and search terms: Particulate Matter, GRI, 305-7, Emissions, Pollutants</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">calculations or conversions </span>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report their PM emissions in thousands or millions of tonnes. Companies may also report using different units, such as <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">kilos rather than tonnes. </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Make sure you check the unit of measurement and enter the full number into the answer field</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">E.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes PM' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500,000 tonnes'. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://convertunits.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 305 - Emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-7 Nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and other significant air emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-7-a Significant air emissions by category",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.4 Ensure environmentally sound management of chemicals and waste and reduce their release to air, water, and soil."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2116,
      "bookmarkers": 9,
      "datasets": 41,
      "companies": 896,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Particulate_Matter_PM_emissions_GRI_305_7_a_formerly_G4_EN21_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836828,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Human Rights Impacts Resolved (G4-HR12-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Human_Rights_Impacts_Resolved_G4_HR12_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Human Rights Impacts Resolved (G4-HR12-b)",
      "question": "Of the total number grievances about human rights impacts filed, how many were resolved during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/human-rights/human-rights-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-HR12.aspx|G4-HR12]] - ‘Number of grievances about human rights impacts filed, addressed, and <strong>resolved</strong> through formal grievance mechanisms’. This disclosure is broader than depicted within the metric description. It also asks for:</p><ul><li><p>G4-HR12-a: Total number of grievances about human rights impacts filed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period.</p></li><li><p>G4-HR12-b: Of the identified grievances, how many were:</p></li></ul><p> Addressed during the reporting period<br> <strong>Resolved during the reporting period</strong></p><ul><li><p>G4-HR12-c: Total number of grievances about human rights impacts filed prior to the reporting period that were resolved during the reporting period.</p></li></ul><p>Disputes may occur over the human rights impacts of an organization’s activities and relationships with others (such as entities in the supply chain). Effective grievance mechanisms play an important role in the successful protection of human rights.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the total number grievances about human rights impacts filed, how many were resolved during the reporting period:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.</p><ul><li><p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL F, Command F or search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p></li><li><p>Use G4 codes, G3 codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. G4-HR12 or HR12, Human Rights violations or grievances resolved</p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value</p></li><li><p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p></p><p><strong>Global Reporting Initiative compliance guidance for companies:</strong></p><p>To calculate the total number grievances about human rights impacts resolved during the reporting period - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/human-rights/human-rights-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-HR12.aspx|G4-HR12]]-b:</p><ul><li><p>​Identify existing formal grievance mechanisms. Formal grievance mechanisms may be managed by the reporting organization or by an external party.</p></li><li><p>Identify the total number of grievances about human rights impact filed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period.</p></li><li><p>Identify the total number of grievances resolved during the reporting period from prior year grievance filings.</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "grievances",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institution",
        "UN SDGs+SDG16.3 Promote the rule of law and ensure equal access to justice for all."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 663,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 24,
      "companies": 447,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Human_Rights_Impacts_Resolved_G4_HR12_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836849,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Grievances about labor practices filed (G4-LA16-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Grievances_about_labor_practices_filed_G4_LA16_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Grievances about labor practices filed (G4-LA16-a)",
      "question": "What is the number of grievances about labor practices filed through formal grievance mechanisms?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the information required by Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/labor-practices-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-LA16.aspx| G4-LA16]] – 'Number of grievances about labor practices <strong>filed</strong>, addressed, and resolved through formal grievance mechanisms'. This disclosure is broader than depicted within the metric description. It also asks for: This disclosure is broader than depicted within the metric description. It also asks for:</p>\r\n<p>​G4-LA16-a. Total number of <strong>grievances about labor practices filed through formal grievance mechanisms</strong> during the reporting period.</p>\r\n<p>G4-LA16-​b. Of the identified grievances, how many were:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Addressed during the reporting period</li>\r\n<li>Resolved during the reporting period</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>G4-LA16-​c.Total number of grievances about labor practices filed prior to the reporting period that were resolved during the reporting period.</p>\r\n<p>Disputes may occur over the labor practices of an organization’s activities and relationships with others (such as entities in the supply chain). Effective grievance mechanisms play an important role in remediating impacts for labor practices.</p>\r\n<p>See this [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/glossary/Pages/default.aspx#Formal-grievance-mechanisms| page]] for more information about 'formal grievance mechanisms'. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To calculate the total number of grievances about labor practices filed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period  - <span>[[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/labor-practices-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-LA16.aspx| G4-LA16]]</span>-a:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Identify existing formal grievance mechanisms. Formal grievance mechanisms may be managed by the reporting organization or by an external party.</li>\r\n<li>Identify the total number of grievances about labor practices filed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period.</li>\r\n<li>Identify the total number of grievances addressed or resolved during the reporting period from both current year and prior year grievance filings. </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see this [[http://wikirate.org/Researching_GRI_Metrics| page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "grievances",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 266,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 11,
      "companies": 239,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Grievances_about_labor_practices_filed_G4_LA16_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836869,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Human Rights Impacts Grievances Filed Prior to Reporting Period and Resolved during the Reporting Period (G4-HR12-c)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Human_Rights_Impacts_Grievances_Filed_Prior_to_Reporting_Period_and_Resolved_during_the_Reporting_Period_G4_HR12_c.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Human Rights Impacts Grievances Filed Prior to Reporting Period and Resolved during the Reporting Period (G4-HR12-c)",
      "question": "What is the total number of grievances about human rights impacts filed prior to the reporting period that were resolved during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. <span>It covers one of the requirements of</span> Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/human-rights/human-rights-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-HR12.aspx| G4-HR12]] -  ‘Number of grievances about human rights impacts filed, addressed, and resolved through formal grievance mechanisms’. This disclosure is broader than depicted within the metric description. It also asks for:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>G4-HR12-a: Total number of grievances about human rights impacts filed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period.</span></li>\r\n<li><span>G4-HR12-b: Of the identified grievances, how many were:</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span>                    Addressed during the reporting period<br>                    Resolved during the reporting period</span></p>\r\n<p>Disputes may occur over the human rights impacts of an organization’s activities and relationships with others (such as entities in the supply chain). Effective grievance mechanisms play an important role in the successful protection of human rights.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To calculate the total number of grievances about human rights impacts filed prior to the reporting period that were resolved during the reporting period - <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/human-rights/human-rights-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-HR12.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-HR12</a>-c:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>​Identify existing formal grievance mechanisms. Formal grievance mechanisms may be managed by the reporting organization or by an external party.</li>\r\n<li>Identify the total number of grievances about human rights impact filed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period.</li>\r\n<li>Identify the total number of grievances resolved during the reporting period from prior years grievance filings.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong><span> </span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "grievances",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 197,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Human_Rights_Impacts_Grievances_Filed_Prior_to_Reporting_Period_and_Resolved_during_the_Reporting_Period_G4_HR12_c+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836911,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+New employee hires, GRI 401-1 (G4-LA1-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+New_employee_hires_GRI_401_1_G4_LA1_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "New employee hires, GRI 401-1 (G4-LA1-a)",
      "question": "What is the total number of new employee hires during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the <strong>social dimension</strong> of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. GRI [[https://wikirate.org/Source_000090316|401]] addresses the topic of employment. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">This </span><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. GRI 401 also covers the employment and working conditions in an organization’s supply chain.</span></p>\r\n<p>The number, age, gender, and region of an organization’s new employee hires can indicate its strategy and ability to attract diverse, qualified employees. This information can signify the organization’s efforts to implement<br>inclusive recruitment practices based on age and gender. It can also signify the optimal use of available<br>labor and talent in different regions.</p>\r\n<p>A high rate of employee turnover can indicate levels of uncertainty and dissatisfaction among employees. It can also signal a fundamental change in the structure of an organization’s core operations.</p>\r\n<p>An unevenpattern of turnover by age or gender can indicate incompatibility or potential inequity in the workplace. Turnover results in changes to the human and intellectual capital of the organization and can impact productivity. Turnover has direct cost implications either in terms of reduced payroll or greater expenses for the recruitment of employees.</p>\r\n<hr>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-LA1-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 401-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found [[https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+New_employee_hires_G4_LA1_a%20methodology|here]].</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is looking for the t<strong>otal number of new employee hires</strong> during the reporting period.<strong><br><br>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<p>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL+F, Command+F, or the search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Use 401 codes, 401-1 codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g.  new hires, new employees, or new workers</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value. For instance, if provided, include a breakdown of the new hires by age group, gender, and region.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p>\r\n<p>Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 337,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 16,
      "companies": 247,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Number_of_labour_related_GRI_disclosures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+New_employee_hires_GRI_401_1_G4_LA1_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836932,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Employee turnover, GRI 401-1 (G4-LA1-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Employee_turnover_GRI_401_1_G4_LA1_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Employee turnover, GRI 401-1 (G4-LA1-b)",
      "question": "What is the total number of employees that left the organisation during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines.<br><br>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. GRI [[https://wikirate.org/Source_000090316|401]] addresses the topic of employment.<br><br>This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. GRI 401 also covers the employment and working conditions in an organization’s supply chain.<br><br>The number, age, gender, and region of an organization’s new employee hires can indicate its strategy and ability to attract diverse, qualified employees. This information can signify the organization’s efforts to implement<br>inclusive recruitment practices based on age and gender. It can also signify the optimal use of available<br>labor and talent in different regions.<br><br>A high rate of employee turnover can indicate levels of uncertainty and dissatisfaction among employees. It can also signal a fundamental change in the structure of an organization’s core operations.<br><br>An unevenpattern of turnover by age or gender can indicate incompatibility or potential inequity in the workplace. Turnover results in changes to the human and intellectual capital of the organization and can impact productivity. Turnover has direct cost implications either in terms of reduced payroll or greater expenses for the recruitment of employees.</p>\r\n<hr>\r\n<p><br><em>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-LA1-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 401-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found here. code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found [[https://wikirate.org/Employee_turnover_G4_LA1_b_Methodology|here]].</em></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric ask you to look for the <strong>total</strong> <strong>number of employees that left the organisation</strong> during the reporting period:<strong><br></strong></p>\r\n<p>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL F, Command F or search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Use codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. GRI 401-11 or 401, \"employee turnover\" or \"employees leaving the organisation\".</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value. For instance, if provided, include a breakdown of the new hires by age group, gender, and region.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p>\r\n<p>Select the '<span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\">Unknown</span>' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Termination & Dismissal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 351,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 19,
      "companies": 246,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Number_of_labour_related_GRI_disclosures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Employee_turnover_GRI_401_1_G4_LA1_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836952,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Fuel consumption from non-renewable sources, GRI 302-1-a (formerly G4-EN3-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Fuel_consumption_from_non_renewable_sources_GRI_302_1_a_formerly_G4_EN3_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Fuel consumption from non-renewable sources, GRI 302-1-a (formerly G4-EN3-a)",
      "question": "What is the total amount of fuel consumption from non-renewable sources (in gigajoules) that the organization is responsible for?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090311\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 302</a> addresses the topic of energy. An organization can consume energy in various forms, such as fuel, electricity, heating, cooling or steam. Energy can be self-generated or purchased from external sources and it can come from renewable sources (such as wind, hydro or solar) or from non-renewable sources (such as coal, petroleum or natural gas).</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Using energy more efficiently and opting for renewable energy sources is essential for combating climate change and for lowering an organization’s overall environmental footprint. The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to energy, and how it manages them.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Non-renewable energy source</strong> - energy source that cannot be replenished, reproduced, grown or generated in a short time period through ecological cycles or agricultural processes. Non-renewable energy sources can include:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>fuel distilled from petroleum or crude oil, such as gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel, and heating oil;</li>\r\n<li>natural gas, such as compressed natural gas (CNG), and liquefied natural gas (LNG);</li>\r\n<li>fuels extracted from natural gas processing and petroleum refining, such as butane, propane, and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG);</li>\r\n<li>coal;</li>\r\n<li>nuclear power</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">G4-EN3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, and the </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">new GRI 302-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Fuel_consumption_from_non_renewable_sources_G4_EN3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Instructions</strong></p>\r\n<p>For this metric question, you are being asked to identify the total non-renewable fuel consumption of an organization for a specific year.</p>\r\n<p>Start by looking for <strong>publicly available documents</strong> that may contain this information, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Annual Report (with Non-Financial Data)</li>\r\n<li>ESG Report</li>\r\n<li>Impact Report</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability Report</li>\r\n<li>Climate Disclosure</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\"><strong>Do NOT use the following reports</strong></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Form 10-K</li>\r\n<li>Annual Information Form (if it contains only financial data)</li>\r\n<li>Interim Report</li>\r\n<li>Quarterly Report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Energy</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Fuel</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Renewable</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- 302-1</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong></p>\r\n<p>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Units</strong></p>\r\n<p>Companies may report fuel consumption in hundreds, thousands or millions of gigajoules or joules. The answer for this metric must be entered into Wikirate in gigajoules (GJ). Make sure you check the unit of measurement and do any conversions necessary. Enter the full number into the answer field.</p>\r\n<p>E.g. If the company reports its non-renewable fuel consumption as '5 million megajoules (MJ)' the answer should be converted to gigajoules (GJ) and entered on Wikirate as '5000 GJ'</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Gigajoules",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 302 - Energy",
        "GRI Standards+302-1 Energy consumption within the organization",
        "GRI Standards+302-1-a Fuel consumption from non-renewable sources - total amount and fuel types used",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E1 - Climate Change",
        "ESRS Standards+E1.5 - Actions and resources in relation to climate change",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG7 - Affordable and Clean Energy",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.4 Improve global resource efficiency and decouple economic growth from environmental degradation.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.2 Achieve sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13: Climate Action",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13.2 Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning."
      ],
      "scores": [
        "Global Reporting Initiative+Fuel consumption from non-renewable sources, GRI 302-1-a (formerly G4-EN3-a)+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3769,
      "bookmarkers": 47,
      "datasets": 101,
      "companies": 1318,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Fuel_consumption_from_non_renewable_sources_GRI_302_1_a_formerly_G4_EN3_a+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Measuring_Fitness+energy_is_from_renewable_sources.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Percentage_renewable_fuel_used.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Emissions_and_Energy_Disclosure.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Renewable_Fuel_Consumption.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/theresah+reported_renewable_breakdown.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/theresah+Total_Renewable_Energy_Use.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Climate_Action_Research+Renewables_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Wollongong_Research_Group_2020+Wollongong_2020_Climate_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Higher_School_of_Economics_Research_Group_2020+From_Farm_to_Fork_2020_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Energy_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Renewable_energy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Fuel_consumption_from_non_renewable_sources_GRI_302_1_a_formerly_G4_EN3_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836964,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Fuel consumption from renewable sources, GRI 302-1-b (formerly G4-EN3-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Fuel_consumption_from_renewable_sources_GRI_302_1_b_formerly_G4_EN3_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Fuel consumption from renewable sources, GRI 302-1-b (formerly G4-EN3-b)",
      "question": "What is the total amount of fuel consumption from renewable sources (in gigajoules) that the organization is responsible for? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090311\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 302</a> addresses the topic of energy. An organization can consume energy in various forms, such as fuel, electricity, heating, cooling or steam. Energy can be self-generated or purchased from external sources and it can come from renewable sources (such as wind, hydro or solar) or from non-renewable sources (such as coal, petroleum or natural gas).</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Using energy more efficiently and opting for renewable energy sources is essential for combating climate change and for lowering an organization’s overall environmental footprint. The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to energy, and how it manages them.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Renewable energy source</strong> - energy source that is capable of being replenished in a short time through ecological cycles or agricultural processes. Renewable energy sources can include geothermal, wind, solar, hydro, and biomass.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">G4-EN3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, and the </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">new GRI 302-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Fuel_consumption_from_renewable_sources_G4_EN3_b_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong>Instructions</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question, you are being asked to identify the total renewable fuel consumption of an organization for a specific year.</p>\r\n<p>Start by looking for <span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>PUBLICLY AVAILABLE </strong></span>documents that may contain this information, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Annual Report (with Non-Financial Data)</li>\r\n<li>ESG Report</li>\r\n<li>Impact Report</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability Report</li>\r\n<li>Climate Disclosure</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\"><strong>Do NOT use the following reports:</strong></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Form 10-K</li>\r\n<li>Annual Information Form (if it contains only financial data)</li>\r\n<li>Interim Report</li>\r\n<li>Quarterly Report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Energy</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Fuel</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Renewable</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- 302-1</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units</span></p>\r\n<p>Companies may report fuel consumption in hundreds, thousands or millions of gigajoules or joules. <strong>The answer for this metric must be entered into Wikirate in gigajoules (GJ)</strong>. Make sure you check the unit of measurement and do any conversions necessary. Enter the full number into the answer field.</p>\r\n<p>E.g. If the company reports its consumption as '5 million megajoules (MJ)' the answer should be converted to gigajoules (GJ) and entered on Wikirate as '5000 GJ'</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Gigajoules",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 302 - Energy",
        "GRI Standards+302-1 Energy consumption within the organization",
        "GRI Standards+302-1-b Fuel consumption from renewable sources - total amount and fuel types used",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E1 - Climate Change",
        "ESRS Standards+E1.5 - Actions and resources in relation to climate change",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG7 - Affordable and Clean Energy",
        "UN SDGs+SDG7.2 Substantially increase the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.4 Improve global resource efficiency and decouple economic growth from environmental degradation.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.2 Achieve sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13: Climate Action",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13.2 Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning."
      ],
      "scores": [
        "Global Reporting Initiative+Fuel consumption from renewable sources, GRI 302-1-b (formerly G4-EN3-b)+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3727,
      "bookmarkers": 16,
      "datasets": 102,
      "companies": 1333,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Fuel_consumption_from_renewable_sources_GRI_302_1_b_formerly_G4_EN3_b+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Measuring_Fitness+energy_is_from_renewable_sources.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Percentage_renewable_fuel_used.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Emissions_and_Energy_Disclosure.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Renewable_Fuel_Consumption.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/theresah+reported_renewable_breakdown.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Climate_Action_Research+Renewables_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Wollongong_Research_Group_2020+Wollongong_2020_Climate_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Higher_School_of_Economics_Research_Group_2020+From_Farm_to_Fork_2020_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Energy_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Renewable_energy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Fuel_consumption_from_renewable_sources_GRI_302_1_b_formerly_G4_EN3_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836973,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Labor Practices Screening of New Suppliers  (G4-LA14-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Labor_Practices_Screening_of_New_Suppliers_G4_LA14_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Labor Practices Screening of New Suppliers  (G4-LA14-a)",
      "question": "What percentage of new suppliers were screened using labor practices criteria?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers the information required by [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/supplier-assessment-for-labor-practices/Pages/G4-LA14.aspx| G4-LA14]] - `Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using labor practices criteria`.</p>\r\n<p>This Indicator informs stakeholders about the percentage of suppliers selected or contracted subject to due diligence processes for labor practices. Due diligence should be initiated as early as possible in the development of a new relationship with a supplier. </p>\r\n<p>Significant potential negative impacts for labor practices may be prevented or mitigated at the stage of structuring contracts or other agreements.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To calculate the the percentage of new suppliers that were screened using labor practices criteria - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/supplier-assessment-for-labor-practices/Pages/G4-LA14.aspx| G4-LA14]]-a:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>​Identify the total number of new suppliers that the organization considered selecting or contracting with. </li>\r\n<li>Identify the total number of new suppliers that were screened using labor practices criteria.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Labor practices criteria may include:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Employment practices</li>\r\n<li>Health and safety practices</li>\r\n<li>Incidents (such as of verbal, psychological, physical, or sexual abuse, coercion or harassment)</li>\r\n<li>Industrial relations</li>\r\n<li>Wages and compensation</li>\r\n<li>Working hours</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.8 Protect labour rights and ensure safe, secure working environments for all workers, including migrants.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institution",
        "UN SDGs+SDG16.6 Develop effective, accountable, and transparent institutions at all levels."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1747,
      "bookmarkers": 8,
      "datasets": 79,
      "companies": 805,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2021+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Labor_Practices_Screening_of_New_Suppliers_G4_LA14_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 836991,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Grievances about labor practices addressed (G4-LA16-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Grievances_about_labor_practices_addressed_G4_LA16_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Grievances about labor practices addressed (G4-LA16-b)",
      "question": "What is the number of grievances about labor practices addressed through formal grievance mechanisms?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers part of the information required by Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/labor-practices-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-LA16.aspx| G4-LA16]] – 'Number of grievances about labor practices filed, <strong>addressed</strong>, and resolved through formal grievance mechanisms'. This disclosure is broader than depicted within the metric description. It also asks for:</p>\r\n<p>G4-LA16-​a. Total number of grievances about labor practices filed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period.</p>\r\n<p>​G4-LA16-​b. Of the identified grievances, how many were:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Addressed</strong> during the reporting period</li>\r\n<li>Resolved during the reporting period</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>G4-LA16-​​c. Total number of grievances about labor practices filed prior to the reporting period that were resolved during the reporting period.</p>\r\n<p>Disputes may occur over the labor practices of an organization’s activities and relationships with others (such as entities in the supply chain). Effective grievance mechanisms play an important role in remediating impacts for labor practices.</p>\r\n<p>See [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/glossary/Pages/default.aspx#Formal-grievance-mechanisms| this page]] for more information about 'formal grievance mechanisms'.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To calculate the total number of grievances about labor practices addressed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period  - <span>[[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/labor-practices-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-LA16.aspx| G4-LA16]]</span>-b:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Identify existing formal grievance mechanisms. Formal grievance mechanisms may be managed by the reporting organization or by an external party.</li>\r\n<li>Identify the total number of grievances about human rights impact filed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period.</li>\r\n<li>Identify the total number of grievances addressed during the reporting period . </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[http://wikirate.org/Researching_GRI_Metrics| this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "grievances",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 197,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Grievances_about_labor_practices_addressed_G4_LA16_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837040,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Human Rights Screening of New Suppliers (G4-HR10-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Human_Rights_Screening_of_New_Suppliers_G4_HR10_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Human Rights Screening of New Suppliers (G4-HR10-a)",
      "question": "What percentage of new suppliers were screened using human rights criteria?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. <span>It covers part of the information required by</span><span> [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/human-rights/supplier-human-rights-assessment/Pages/G4-HR10.aspx| G4-HR10]] - `Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using human rights criteria`.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>​This Indicator informs stakeholders about the percentage of suppliers selected or contracted subject to the organization’s human rights due diligence processes. </span></p>\r\n<p><span>The UN <em>Protect, Respect and Remedy: a Framework for Business and Human Rights</em> (107) has confirmed the expectation that organizations should respect human rights throughout their activities and relationships with others. </span></p>\r\n<p><span>Human rights due diligence should be initiated as early as possible in the development of a new relationship with a supplier. Significant potential negative human rights impacts may be prevented or mitigated at the stage of structuring contracts or other agreements.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>To calculate the </span>percentage of new suppliers that were screened using human rights criteria - <span>[[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/human-rights/supplier-human-rights-assessment/Pages/G4-HR10.aspx| G4-HR10]]</span><span>-a:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>​Identify the total number of new suppliers that the organization considered selecting or contracting with. </li>\r\n<li>Identify the total number of new suppliers that were screened using human rights criteria. </li>\r\n<li>Calculate the percentage.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Human rights criteria may include:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Child labor</span></li>\r\n<li><span></span>Discrimination</li>\r\n<li>Forced or compulsory labor</li>\r\n<li>Freedom of association and collective bargaining</li>\r\n<li>Indigenous rights</li>\r\n<li>Security practices</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong><span> </span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 414 - Supplier Social Assessment",
        "GRI Standards+414-1 New suppliers that were screened using social criteria",
        "GRI Standards+414-1-a Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using social criteria"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1659,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 34,
      "companies": 843,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Human_Rights_Screening_of_New_Suppliers_G4_HR10_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837051,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Grievances about labor practices resolved (G4-LA16-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Grievances_about_labor_practices_resolved_G4_LA16_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Grievances about labor practices resolved (G4-LA16-b)",
      "question": "What is the number of grievances about labor practices resolved through formal grievance mechanisms?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers part of the information required by Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/labor-practices-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-LA16.aspx| G4-LA16]] – ‘Number of grievances about labor practices filed, addressed, and <strong>resolved</strong> through formal grievance mechanisms'. This disclosure is broader than depicted within the metric description. It also asks for:<span> </span></p>\r\n<p>​G4-LA16-a. Total number of grievances about labor practices filed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period.</p>\r\n<p>G4-LA16-​b. Of the identified grievances, how many were:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Addressed during the reporting period</li>\r\n<li><strong>Resolved</strong> during the reporting period</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>G4-LA16-​c. Total number of grievances about labor practices filed prior to the reporting period that were resolved during the reporting period.</p>\r\n<p>Disputes may occur over the labor practices of an organization’s activities and relationships with others (such as entities in the supply chain). Effective grievance mechanisms play an important role in remediating impacts for labor practices.</p>\r\n<p>Number of grievances about labor practices filed, addressed, and resolved through formal grievance mechanisms:</p>\r\n<p> See this [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/glossary/Pages/default.aspx#Formal-grievance-mechanisms| page]] for more information about 'formal grievance mechanisms'.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To calculate the total number of grievances about labor practices resolved through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period  - <span>[[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/labor-practices-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-LA16.aspx| G4-LA16]]</span>-b:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Identify existing formal grievance mechanisms. Formal grievance mechanisms may be managed by the reporting organization or by an external party.</li>\r\n<li>Identify the total number of grievances about human rights impact filed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period.</li>\r\n<li>Identify the total number of grievances resolved during the reporting period. </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<p>Please see [[http://wikirate.org/Researching_GRI_Metrics| this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "grievances",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 210,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Grievances_about_labor_practices_resolved_G4_LA16_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837083,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Investment contracts with human rights clauses, screening (total number), GRI 412-3-a (formerly G4-HR1-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Investment_contracts_with_human_rights_clauses_screening_total_number_GRI_412_3_a_formerly_G4_HR1_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Investment contracts with human rights clauses, screening (total number), GRI 412-3-a (formerly G4-HR1-a)",
      "question": "What is the total number of significant investment agreements and contracts that include human rights clauses or that underwent human rights screening?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. The GRI Standards are structured as a set of interrelated, modular standards. The full set can be downloaded at <a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a>. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">I<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">n the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">GRI 412 addresses the topic of human rights assessment</span>. The international standard that establishes the expectations of responsible conduct for organizations with respect to human rights is the United Nations (UN) ‘Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights’, endorsed by the UN Human Rights Council in 2011. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric (G4-HR1) can be found </span><a href=\"/Contracts_with_human_rights_clauses_or_screening_G4_HR1_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">An organization can impact human rights directly, through its own actions and operations. It can also impact human rights indirectly, through its interactions and relationships with others, including governments, local communities and suppliers, and through its investments.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Organizations are responsible for their impacts on the entire range of internationally recognized human rights. These rights include, at a minimum, all rights set out in the International Bill of Rights and the principles set out in the International Labour Organization (ILO) ‘Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work’. The International Bill of Rights includes the following three instruments:</span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">the UN Declaration, ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’, 1948;</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">the UN Convention, ‘International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’, 1966;</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">the UN Convention, ‘International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights’, 1966.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In order to identify, prevent and mitigate negative human rights impacts, an organization can undertake human rights reviews or impact assessments of its operations. It can also implement specialized training that equips employees to address human rights in the course of their regular work.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In addition, an organization can <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">integrate human rights criteria in screening</span>, or include human rights criteria in performance requirements when making contracts and agreements with other parties, such as joint ventures and subsidiaries.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s approach to preventing and mitigating negative human rights impacts. <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Full disclosure guidance can be found here: <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1027/gri-412-human-rights-assessment-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 412: Human Rights Assessment</a></span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this metric question you need to identify for a specific year, the <strong><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">number of investment agreements and contracts that include human rights clauses</span></strong>. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or not found in appropriate documents, select the 'Unknown' answer box.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> and search terms for this metric: Investment, Contract, Agreement, Human Rights, Clause, Supplier, GRI, HR1, 412</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If any calculations are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer. Additionally, i<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">f the organization reports its</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong> definition</strong> of ‘significant investment agreements’, include this in the comments.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "agreements",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 205,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Investment_contracts_with_human_rights_clauses_screening_total_number_GRI_412_3_a_formerly_G4_HR1_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837199,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Non-Hazardous Waste Recycled, GRI 306-2 (formerly G4-EN23-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Non_Hazardous_Waste_Recycled_GRI_306_2_formerly_G4_EN23_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Non-Hazardous Waste Recycled, GRI 306-2 (formerly G4-EN23-a)",
      "question": "What is the total amount of non-hazardous waste recycled by the organization (in metric tonnes)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The full set can be downloaded at </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-EN23-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">code</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">306-2 </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><em>Waste by type and disposal method</em></span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Waste_Generated_Recycled_EN23_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"font-size: 1rem; background-color: #ffffff;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water, and ecosystems.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090313\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 306</a> addresses the topic of <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">effluents and waste</span>. This includes water discharges; the generation, treatment and disposal of waste; and spills of chemicals, oils, fuels, and other substances.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The generation, treatment and disposal of waste – including its improper transportation – can pose harm to human health and the environment. This is of particular concern if waste is transported to countries lacking the infrastructure and regulations to handle it.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to effluents and waste, and how it manages these impacts.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question you need to identify the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">total non-hazardous waste recycled (in </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bold;\">tonnes)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> by the organization </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> &amp; search terms: Non-Hazardous,<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Waste,</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Recycle, GRI, 306-2, EN23</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">calculations or conversions </span>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report the <em>volume</em> in thousands of cubic metres, or using a unit other than cubic meters. If this is the case, convert units to cubic meters (see website below), or add the number of zeros indicated, and fill in the total number in the answer field - e.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500000'. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://convertunits.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 306 - Waste 2020",
        "GRI Standards+306-2 Management of significant waste-related impacts",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.5 Substantially reduce waste generation through prevention, reduction, recycling, and reuse."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2671,
      "bookmarkers": 11,
      "datasets": 70,
      "companies": 1021,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Percentage_non_hazardous_waste_recycled.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Non_Hazardous_Waste_Recycled_GRI_306_2_formerly_G4_EN23_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837229,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Investment contracts with human rights clauses (%), GRI 412-3-a (formerly G4-HR1-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Investment_contracts_with_human_rights_clauses_GRI_412_3_a_formerly_G4_HR1_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Investment contracts with human rights clauses (%), GRI 412-3-a (formerly G4-HR1-a)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of significant investment agreements and contracts that include human rights clauses or that underwent human rights screening?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. The GRI Standards are structured as a set of interrelated, modular standards. The full set can be downloaded at <a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a>. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">I<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">n the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><strong>GRI 412 addresses the topic of human rights assessment</strong>. The international standard that establishes the expectations of responsible conduct for organizations with respect to human rights is the United Nations (UN) ‘Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights’, endorsed by the UN Human Rights Council in 2011. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric (G4-HR1) can be found </span><a href=\"/Contracts_with_human_rights_clauses_or_screening_G4_HR1_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">An organization can impact human rights directly, through its own actions and operations. It can also impact human rights indirectly, through its interactions and relationships with others, including governments, local communities and suppliers, and through its investments. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Organizations are responsible for their impacts on the entire range of internationally recognized human rights. These rights include, at a minimum, all rights set out in the International Bill of Rights and the principles set out in the International Labour Organization (ILO) ‘Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work’. The International Bill of Rights includes the following three instruments:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> the UN Declaration, ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’, 1948; </span></li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">the UN Convention, ‘International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’, 1966;</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">the UN Convention, ‘International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights’, 1966.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In order to identify, prevent and mitigate negative human rights impacts, an organization can undertake human rights reviews or impact assessments of its operations. It can also implement specialized training that equips employees to address human rights in the course of their regular work. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In addition, an organization can <strong>integrate human rights criteria in screening</strong>, or include human rights criteria in performance requirements when making contracts and agreements with other parties, such as joint ventures and subsidiaries. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s approach to preventing and mitigating negative human rights impacts. <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Full disclosure guidance can be found here: <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1027/gri-412-human-rights-assessment-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 412: Human Rights Assessment</a></span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this metric question you need to identify for a specific year, the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">percentage of investment agreements and contracts that include human rights clauses</span></span>. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or not found in appropriate documents, select the 'Unknown' answer box.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> and search terms for this metric: Investment, Contract, Agreement, Human Rights, Clause, Supplier, GRI, HR1, 412</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If any calculations are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer. Additionally, i<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">f the organization reports its</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> definition</span> of ‘significant investment agreements’, include this in the comments.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 206,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 201,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Investment_contracts_with_human_rights_clauses_GRI_412_3_a_formerly_G4_HR1_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837241,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Female employees, GRI 102-8-a (formerly G4-10-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Female_employees_GRI_102_8_a_formerly_G4_10_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Female employees, GRI 102-8-a (formerly G4-10-a)",
      "question": "What is the total number of female employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">The GRI Standards are structured as a set of interrelated, modular standards. The full set can be downloaded at www.globalreporting.org/standards/. There are three universal Standards that apply to every organization preparing a sustainability report:</span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 101: Foundation</span></li>\r\n<li><a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1037/gri-102-general-disclosures-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 102: General Disclosures</span></a></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 103: Management Approach</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 102: General Disclosures, which this metric falls within,</span> provide an overview of an organization’s size, geographic location, and activities. This contextual information is important to help stakeholders understand the nature of the organization and its economic, environmental and social impacts.</p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #495057; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric (G4-10a) can be found </span><a href=\"/Employees_G4_10_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #03998d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">here</span></a><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #495057; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this metric you need to find the \"Total number of <strong>female</strong> <strong>employees</strong>\" (GRI 102-8-a). Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong>: Once you have found the answer, add the total number without commas to the answer field. If the organization provides useful context to the answer, such as an explanation of how the data have been compiled, and assumptions made, copy-paste this in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "female employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 2 - General Disclosures",
        "GRI Standards+2-7 Employees",
        "GRI Standards+2-7 Workforce breakdown by gender and region",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+S1 - Own Workforce",
        "ESRS Standards+S1.5 - Characteristics of the company's employees",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.5 Achieve full and productive employment and equal pay for all, including youth and persons with disabilities.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG10 - Reduced Inequalities",
        "UN SDGs+SDG10.2 Promote social, economic, and political inclusion of all people, regardless of background or status."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4583,
      "bookmarkers": 27,
      "datasets": 136,
      "companies": 2040,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Number_of_labour_related_GRI_disclosures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Female_Workers.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Social_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+female_employee.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Sussex_Research_Group+Diversity_Inclusion_Disclosure.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2021+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Gender_Balance_Index_V2.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Number_of_Female_Employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Female_employees_GRI_102_8_a_formerly_G4_10_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837254,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Male employees, GRI 102-8-a (formerly G4-10-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Male_employees_GRI_102_8_a_formerly_G4_10_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Male employees, GRI 102-8-a (formerly G4-10-a)",
      "question": "What is the total number of male employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">The GRI Standards are structured as a set of interrelated, modular standards. The full set can be downloaded at www.globalreporting.org/standards/. There are three universal Standards that apply to every organization preparing a sustainability report:</span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 101: Foundation</span></li>\r\n<li><a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1037/gri-102-general-disclosures-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 102: General Disclosures</span></a></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 103: Management Approach</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 102: General Disclosures, which this metric falls within,</span> provide an overview of an organization’s size, geographic location, and activities. This contextual information is important to help stakeholders understand the nature of the organization and its economic, environmental and social impacts.</p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #495057; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric (G4-10a) can be found </span><a href=\"/Employees_G4_10_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #03998d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">here</span></a><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #495057; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this metric you need to find the \"Total number of <strong>male</strong> <strong>employees</strong>\" (GRI 102-8-a). Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong>: Once you have found the answer, add the total number without commas to the answer field. If the organization provides useful context to the answer, such as an explanation of how the data have been compiled, and assumptions made, copy-paste this in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG10 - Reduced Inequalities"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4004,
      "bookmarkers": 37,
      "datasets": 106,
      "companies": 1860,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Number_of_labour_related_GRI_disclosures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Social_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Sussex_Research_Group+Diversity_Inclusion_Disclosure.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Number_of_Male_Employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Male_employees_GRI_102_8_a_formerly_G4_10_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837273,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Rate of employee turn over GRI 401-1 (G4-LA1-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Rate_of_employee_turn_over_GRI_401_1_G4_LA1_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Rate of employee turn over GRI 401-1 (G4-LA1-b)",
      "question": "What is the total rate (%) of employees leaving company during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines.<br><br>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. GRI [[https://wikirate.org/Source_000090316|401]] addresses the topic of employment.<br><br>This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. GRI 401 also covers the employment and working conditions in an organization’s supply chain.<br><br>The number, age, gender, and region of an organization’s new employee hires can indicate its strategy and ability to attract diverse, qualified employees. This information can signify the organization’s efforts to implement<br>inclusive recruitment practices based on age and gender. It can also signify the optimal use of available<br>labor and talent in different regions.<br><br>A high rate of employee turnover can indicate levels of uncertainty and dissatisfaction among employees. It can also signal a fundamental change in the structure of an organization’s core operations.<br><br>An unevenpattern of turnover by age or gender can indicate incompatibility or potential inequity in the workplace. Turnover results in changes to the human and intellectual capital of the organization and can impact productivity. Turnover has direct cost implications either in terms of reduced payroll or greater expenses for the recruitment of employees.</p>\r\n<hr>\r\n<p><br><em>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-LA1-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 401-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found here. code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found [[https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Rate_of_employee_turnover_G4_LA1_b_methodology|here]].</em></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is looking for the <strong>total rate (%) of employees leaving the company</strong> during the reporting period:<br><br><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<p>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Use the GRI Index, CTR+ F, Command+F or search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Use 401 codes, 401-1 codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. GRI 401-1, 401, or employee turnover rate</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value. For instance, if provided, include a breakdown of the new hires by age group, gender, and region.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>Select the '<strong><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\">Unknown</span></strong>' answer box if the company has not published the data.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>Global Reporting Initiative compliance guidance for companies:</strong></p>\r\n<p>To calculate the total rate of employee turnover during the reporting period [[https://wikirate.org/Source_000090316|GRI 401]]-b:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Identify the employee turnover (number of employees in a workforce that leave) during the reporting period.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Identify total employee numbers at the end of the reporting period.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Calculate the the total rate (%) of employee turnover.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Termination & Dismissal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 401 - Employment",
        "GRI Standards+401-1 New employee hires and employee turnover",
        "GRI Standards+401-1-b Number and rate of employee turnover during the reporting period"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 445,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 17,
      "companies": 295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Number_of_labour_related_GRI_disclosures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Rate_of_employee_turn_over_GRI_401_1_G4_LA1_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837284,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Reduction of energy consumption, GRI 302-4 (formerly G4-EN6)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Reduction_of_energy_consumption_GRI_302_4_formerly_G4_EN6.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Reduction of energy consumption, GRI 302-4 (formerly G4-EN6)",
      "question": "In relation to the previous year, how much has the company reduced its energy consumption as a direct result of conservation and efficiency initiatives?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090311\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 302</a> addresses the topic of energy. An organization can consume energy in various forms, such as fuel, electricity, heating, cooling or steam. Energy can be self-generated or purchased from external sources and it can come from renewable sources (such as wind, hydro or solar) or from non-renewable sources (such as coal, petroleum or natural gas).</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Using energy more efficiently and opting for renewable energy sources is essential for combating climate change and for lowering an organization’s overall environmental footprint. The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to energy, and how it manages them.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Energy reduction</strong> - amount of energy no longer used or needed to carry out the same processes or tasks</p>\r\n<p><strong>Conservation and efficiency initiatives </strong>- organizational or technological modification that allows a defined process or task to be carried out using less energy</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">G4-EN6 is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, and the new </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">GRI 302-4 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Reduction_of_energy_consumption_G4_EN6_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the reduction of energy consumption as a result of conservation/efficiency initiatives for a specific year in relation to the previous or baseline year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Energy</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Reduction</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Energy efficiency</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">302-4</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">GRI</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">GRI Index</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Companies may report energy consumption reduction in hundreds, thousands or millions of gigajoules or joules. <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">The answer for this metric must be entered into Wikirate in gigajoules (GJ)</span>. Make sure you check the unit of measurement and do any conversions necessary. Enter the full number into the answer field.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">E.g. If the company reports its consumption as '5 million megajoules (MJ)' the answer should be converted to gigajoules (GJ) and entered on Wikirate as '5000 GJ'</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Gigajoules",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 302 - Energy",
        "GRI Standards+302-4 Reduction of energy consumption",
        "GRI Standards+302-4-a Amount of reductions in energy consumption achieved as a direct result of conservation and efficiency initiatives",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG7 - Affordable and Clean Energy",
        "UN SDGs+SDG7.3 Double the global rate of improvement in energy efficiency.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.4 Improve global resource efficiency and decouple economic growth from environmental degradation.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.2 Achieve sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.6 Encourage companies to adopt sustainable practices and include sustainability information in their reporting.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13: Climate Action",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13.2 Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning."
      ],
      "scores": [
        "Global Reporting Initiative+Reduction of energy consumption, GRI 302-4 (formerly G4-EN6)+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 826,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 24,
      "companies": 433,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Reduction_of_energy_consumption_GRI_302_4_formerly_G4_EN6+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Higher_School_of_Economics_Research_Group_2020+From_Farm_to_Fork_2020_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Reduction_of_energy_consumption_GRI_302_4_formerly_G4_EN6+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837320,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Average hours of training, GRI 404-1 (formerly G4-LA9)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Average_hours_of_training_GRI_404_1_formerly_G4_LA9.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Average hours of training, GRI 404-1 (formerly G4-LA9)",
      "question": "What is the average hours of training per employee during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090318\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 404</a> addresses the topic of training and education. This includes an organization’s approach to training and upgrading employee skills, and performance and career development reviews. It also includes transition assistance programs to facilitate continued employability, and the management of career endings due to retirement or termination. </p>\r\n<p>These concepts are covered in key instruments of the International Labour Organization and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. </p>\r\n<p>This disclosure provides insight into the scale of an organization’s investment in training, and the degree to which the investment is made across the entire employee base.</p>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-LA9 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 404-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <a href=\"/Average_hours_of_training_G4_LA9_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify the average hours of training that the organization's employees have undertaken during the reporting period. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 1rem;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p>- Education</p>\r\n<p>- Training</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">- 404-1</span></p>\r\n<p>- GRI</p>\r\n<p>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p>If the company reports the total hours of training given to employees, you need to divide this total by the number of employees in the organization <strong>(average training hours per employee = total number of training hours provided to employees / total number of employees). </strong></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "hours",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 404 - Training and Education",
        "GRI Standards+404-1 Average hours of training per year per employee",
        "GRI Standards+404-1-a Average hours of training per year per employee category",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG4 - Quality Education",
        "UN SDGs+SDG4.5 Eliminate gender and other disparities in education and ensure equal access for vulnerable groups.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG4.7 Ensure all learners gain knowledge and skills for sustainable development, human rights, and global citizenship.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5.5 Ensure women’s full participation and equal opportunities for leadership in political, economic, and public life."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3357,
      "bookmarkers": 12,
      "datasets": 89,
      "companies": 1228,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Number_of_labour_related_GRI_disclosures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Social_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Gender_Career_Growth_Parity_Index.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Average_hours_of_training_GRI_404_1_formerly_G4_LA9+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837335,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Average hours of training (female), GRI 404-1 (formerly G4-LA9)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Average_hours_of_training_female_GRI_404_1_formerly_G4_LA9.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Average hours of training (female), GRI 404-1 (formerly G4-LA9)",
      "question": "What is the average hours of training per female employee during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090318\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 404</a> addresses the topic of training and education. This includes an organization’s approach to training and upgrading employee skills, and performance and career development reviews. It also includes transition assistance programs to facilitate continued employability, and the management of career endings due to retirement or termination. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">These concepts are covered in key instruments of the International Labour Organization and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This disclosure provides insight into the scale of an organization’s investment in training, and the degree to which the investment is made across the entire employee base.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-LA9 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 404-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Average_hours_of_training_female_G4_LA9_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the average hours of training that the organization's female employees have undertaken during the reporting period. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 1rem;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Education</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Training</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">- 404-1</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p>If the company reports the gender breakdown as a percentage, you will need to make a calculation based on the total average hours of training for all employees.  </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "hours",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 404 - Training and Education",
        "GRI Standards+404-1 Average hours of training per year per employee",
        "GRI Standards+404-1-a Average hours of training per year per employee category",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG4 - Quality Education",
        "UN SDGs+SDG4.5 Eliminate gender and other disparities in education and ensure equal access for vulnerable groups.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG4.7 Ensure all learners gain knowledge and skills for sustainable development, human rights, and global citizenship.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5.5 Ensure women’s full participation and equal opportunities for leadership in political, economic, and public life."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2947,
      "bookmarkers": 18,
      "datasets": 72,
      "companies": 1123,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Number_of_labour_related_GRI_disclosures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Gender_Career_Growth_Parity_Index.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Average_hours_of_training_female_GRI_404_1_formerly_G4_LA9+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837346,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Energy intensity, GRI 302-3 (formerly G4-EN5)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Energy_intensity_GRI_302_3_formerly_G4_EN5.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Energy intensity, GRI 302-3 (formerly G4-EN5)",
      "question": "What is the energy intensity ratio for the organization?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090311\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 302</a> addresses the topic of energy. An organization can consume energy in various forms, such as fuel, electricity, heating, cooling or steam. Energy can be self-generated or purchased from external sources and it can come from renewable sources (such as wind, hydro or solar) or from non-renewable sources (such as coal, petroleum or natural gas).</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Using energy more efficiently and opting for renewable energy sources is essential for combating climate change and for lowering an organization’s overall environmental footprint. The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to energy, and how it manages them.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Energy intensity </strong>ratios define energy consumption in the context of an organization-specific metric. These ratios express the energy required per unit of activity, output, or any other organization-specific metric. Intensity ratios are often called normalized environmental impact data.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">G4-EN5 is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, and the new </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">GRI 302-3 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Energy_intensity_G4_EN5_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the energy intensity ratio of the organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Energy</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Intensity</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">302-3</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">GRI</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">GRI Index</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": ": 1",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 302 - Energy",
        "GRI Standards+302-3 Energy intensity",
        "GRI Standards+302-3-a Energy intensity ratio for the organization"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 914,
      "bookmarkers": 7,
      "datasets": 18,
      "companies": 404,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Energy_intensity_GRI_302_3_formerly_G4_EN5+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837376,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Average hours of training (male), GRI 404-1 (formerly G4-LA9)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Average_hours_of_training_male_GRI_404_1_formerly_G4_LA9.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Average hours of training (male), GRI 404-1 (formerly G4-LA9)",
      "question": "What is the average hours of training per male employee during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090318\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 404</a> addresses the topic of training and education. This includes an organization’s approach to training and upgrading employee skills, and performance and career development reviews. It also includes transition assistance programs to facilitate continued employability, and the management of career endings due to retirement or termination. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">These concepts are covered in key instruments of the International Labour Organization and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This disclosure provides insight into the scale of an organization’s investment in training, and the degree to which the investment is made across the entire employee base.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-LA9 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 404-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Average_hours_of_training_male_G4_LA9_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Average_hours_of_training_male_G4_LA9_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">.</a> </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the average hours of training that the organization's male employees have undertaken during the reporting period. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 1rem;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Education</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Training</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">- 404-1</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company reports the gender breakdown as a percentage, you will need to make a calculation based on the total average hours of training for all employees.  </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "hours",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 404 - Training and Education",
        "GRI Standards+404-1 Average hours of training per year per employee",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG4 - Quality Education",
        "UN SDGs+SDG4.7 Ensure all learners gain knowledge and skills for sustainable development, human rights, and global citizenship.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5.5 Ensure women’s full participation and equal opportunities for leadership in political, economic, and public life.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5.b Promote women’s empowerment through technology, especially information and communications technology.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2618,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 57,
      "companies": 1109,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Number_of_labour_related_GRI_disclosures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Gender_Career_Growth_Parity_Index.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Average_hours_of_training_male_GRI_404_1_formerly_G4_LA9+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837420,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (G4-EN19-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Reduction_of_greenhouse_gas_GHG_emissions_G4_EN19_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (G4-EN19-a)",
      "question": "How much reduction in Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions has the company achieved as a direct result of initiatives to reduce emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines.</span> It covers one of the reporting requirements of the Indicator <span><a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/emissions/Pages/G4-EN19.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-EN19</a></span> – 'Reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions', wherein the company is encouraged to <strong>report the amount of GHG emissions reductions</strong> achieved as a direct result of initiatives to reduce emissions, in metric tons of CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent.</p>\r\n<p>GHG emissions are a major contributor to climate change and are governed by the UN ‘United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change’ (<a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#100\" title=\"Reference number 100\">100</a>) and the subsequent UN ‘Kyoto Protocol’. As a result, different national and international regulations and incentive systems (such as tradable emission permits) aim to control the volume, and reward the reduction of GHG emissions. <br><br>This Indicator may be used in combination with Indicators <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/emissions/Pages/G4-EN15.aspx\">G4-EN15</a>, <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/emissions/Pages/G4-EN16.aspx\">G4-EN16</a> and <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/emissions/Pages/G4-EN17.aspx\">G4-EN17</a> to monitor the reduction of GHG emissions with reference to the organization’s targets, or to regulations and trading systems at international or national levels.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>​</p><p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions:</strong></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.</p><ul><li><p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL F, Command F or search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p></li><li><p>Use G4 codes, G3 codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. G4-EN19 or EN19, reduction in GHG emissions or greenhouse gas emissions</p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value</p></li><li><p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><strong>Global Reporting Initiative compliance guidance for companies:</strong></p><p>To calculate reductions in GHG emissions - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/emissions/Pages/G4-EN19.aspx|G4-EN19]]-a:</p><p>Identify initiatives that have been implemented which have reduced the generation of GHG emissions. Initiatives may include but are not limited to:</p><ul><li><p>Process redesign</p></li><li><p>Conversion and retrofitting of equipment</p></li><li><p>Fuel switching</p></li><li><p>Changes in employee behavior</p></li><li><p>Offsets</p></li></ul><p> Organizations with many initiatives for reducing GHG emissions may prioritize reporting the initiatives that were implemented in the reporting period, and that have the potential to contribute significantly to reducing emissions. Initiatives and their reduction targets may be described in the DMA for the Emissions Aspect.</p><p><br>Organizations may choose to report reductions disaggregated by initiatives or groups of initiatives.<br><br>Report the GHG emissions reductions separately for direct (Scope 1), energy indirect (Scope 2), and other indirect (Scope 3) emissions. Reductions in emissions that result from reduced production capacity or outsourcing are not included in this Indicator.<br><br>Reductions from offsets should be reported separately from other reductions.<br><br>Organizations may choose to use either inventory or project method for accounting for emissions reductions. Inventory method compares emissions reductions to a base year while project method compares emissions reductions to a baseline. Further details on the inventory and project reduction accounting methods are available in the WRI and WBCSD 'GHG Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard' and WRI and WBCSD 'GHG Protocol for Project Accounting'. <br><br>Organizations are expected to report standards, methodologies, and assumptions used to calculate and measure reduction of GHG emissions, with a reference to the calculation tools used. Organizations subject to different standards and methodologies should describe the approach to selecting them.</p><p>Reporting on this Indicator should include the following contextual information as a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>​G4-EN19-b: Report gases included in the calculation (whether CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6, NF3, or all).​</p></li><li><p>G4-EN19-c: Report the chosen base year or baseline and the rationale for choosing it.​</p></li><li><p>G4-EN19-d: Report standards, methodologies, and assumptions used.</p></li><li><p>G4-EN19-e: Report whether the reductions in GHG emissions occurred in direct (Scope 1), energy indirect (Scope 2), other indirect (Scope 3) emissions.</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2 equivalent",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 323,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 12,
      "companies": 246,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Reduction_of_greenhouse_gas_GHG_emissions_G4_EN19_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837444,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Female injury rate (G4-LA6-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Female_injury_rate_G4_LA6_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Female injury rate (G4-LA6-a)",
      "question": "What is the injury rate (IR) for the female workforce (employees plus supervised workers)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. </span><span>It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator </span><span>[[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/occupational-health-and-safetz/Pages/G4-LA6.aspx|G4-LA6]] </span>- ‘Type of injury and rates of injury, occupational diseases, lost days, and absenteeism, and total number of work-related fatalities, by region and by <strong>gender</strong>’.</p>\r\n<p>This indicator also asks for type of injury, occupational diseases, lost days, and absenteeism, and number of work-related fatalities, by region and by gender, for the total workforce (total employees plus supervised workers) and for independed contractors working on-site). (G4-LA6-a, G4-LA6-b)</p>\r\n<p><span>​Health and safety performance is a key measure of an organization’s duty of care. Low injury and absentee rates are generally linked to positive trends in staff morale and productivity. This Indicator shows whether health and safety management practices are resulting in fewer occupational health and safety incidents. An evaluation of trends and patterns may also indicate potential workplace inequity.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the workforce injury rate (the number of injuries per million hours worked by female workers in the reporting period). </strong></p><p>\"Lost time injury rates\" are not appropriate for this metric, this metric is about recording the <strong>number of injuries</strong>. If this is presented as a ratio other than \"per million hours worked\", please convert it to \"per million hours worked\".</p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong><br>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.<br></p><ul><li><p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL F, Command F or search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p></li><li><p>Use G4 codes, G3 codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. G4-LA6 or LA6, female injury rate or female IR</p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value</p></li><li><p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p></p><p><strong>Global Reporting Initiative compliance guidance for companies:</strong></p><p>To calculate the female injury rate - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/occupational-health-and-safety/Pages/G4-LA6.aspx|G4-LA6]]-a:</p><ul><li><p>Identify the injury rate (IR) experienced during the reporting period by gender</p></li><li><p>Report this information for the total female workforce (that is total employees and supervised workers)</p></li></ul><p>Reporting on this Indicator should include the following contextual information as a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>G4-LA6-c: ​The system of rules applied in recording and reporting accident statistics.</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.8 Protect labour rights and ensure safe, secure working environments for all workers, including migrants."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1160,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 33,
      "companies": 704,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Female_injury_rate_G4_LA6_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837454,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Full-time employees, GRI 102-8-c (formerly G4-10-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Full_time_employees_GRI_102_8_c_formerly_G4_10_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Full-time employees, GRI 102-8-c (formerly G4-10-b)",
      "question": "What is the total number of permanent full-time employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">The GRI Standards are structured as a set of interrelated, modular standards. The full set can be downloaded at www.globalreporting.org/standards/. There are three universal Standards that apply to every organization preparing a sustainability report:</span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 101: Foundation</span></li>\r\n<li><a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1037/gri-102-general-disclosures-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 102: General Disclosures</span></a></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 103: Management Approach</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 102: General Disclosures, which this metric falls within,</span> provide an overview of an organization’s size, geographic location, and activities. This contextual information is important to help stakeholders understand the nature of the organization and its economic, environmental and social impacts.</p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #495057; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric (G4-10b) can be found </span><a href=\"/Employees_G4_10_b_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #03998d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">here</span></a><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #495057; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this metric you need to find the \"Total number of <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">full-time employees</span>\" (GRI 102-8-c). Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, add the total number without commas to the answer field. If the organization provides useful context to the answer, such as an explanation of how the data have been compiled, and assumptions made, copy-paste this in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2263,
      "bookmarkers": 11,
      "datasets": 46,
      "companies": 990,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Number_of_labour_related_GRI_disclosures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Social_Metrics_Reported.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Full_time_employees_GRI_102_8_c_formerly_G4_10_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837487,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Part-time employees, GRI 102-8-c (formerly G4-10-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Part_time_employees_GRI_102_8_c_formerly_G4_10_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Part-time employees, GRI 102-8-c (formerly G4-10-b)",
      "question": "\r\n\r\n\r\nWhat is the total number of permanent part-time employees?\r\n\r\n\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">The GRI Standards are structured as a set of interrelated, modular standards. The full set can be downloaded at www.globalreporting.org/standards/. There are three universal Standards that apply to every organization preparing a sustainability report:</span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 101: Foundation</span></li>\r\n<li><a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1037/gri-102-general-disclosures-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 102: General Disclosures</a></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 103: Management Approach</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 102: General Disclosures, which this metric falls within,</span> provide an overview of an organization’s size, geographic location, and activities. This contextual information is important to help stakeholders understand the nature of the organization and its economic, environmental and social impacts.</p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #495057; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric (G4-10b) can be found </span><a href=\"/Employees_G4_10_b_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #03998d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">here</span></a><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #495057; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this metric you need to find the \"Total number of <strong>part</strong><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">-time employees</span>\" (GRI 102-8-c). Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, add the total number without commas to the answer field. If the organization provides useful context to the answer, such as an explanation of how the data have been compiled, and assumptions made, copy-paste this in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 2 - General Disclosures",
        "GRI Standards+2-7 Employees",
        "GRI Standards+2-7-b-v Part-time employees",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG10 - Reduced Inequalities"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1977,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 31,
      "companies": 949,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Number_of_labour_related_GRI_disclosures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Social_Metrics_Reported.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Part_time_employees_GRI_102_8_c_formerly_G4_10_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837499,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Male injury rate (G4-LA6-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Male_injury_rate_G4_LA6_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Male injury rate (G4-LA6-a)",
      "question": "What is the injury rate (IR) for the male workforce (employees plus supervised workers)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator <span>[[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/occupational-health-and-safetz/Pages/G4-LA6.aspx|G4-LA6]] -</span> ‘Type of injury and rates of injury, occupational diseases, lost days, and absenteeism, and total number of work-related fatalities, by region and by <strong>gender</strong>’.</p>\r\n<p>This indicator also asks for type of injury, occupational diseases, lost days, and absenteeism, and number of work-related fatalities, by region and by gender, for the total workforce (total employees plus supervised workers) and for independed contractors working on-site). (G4-LA6-a, G4-LA6-b)</p>\r\n<p>​Health and safety performance is a key measure of an organization’s duty of care. Low injury and absentee rates are generally linked to positive trends in staff morale and productivity. This Indicator shows whether health and safety management practices are resulting in fewer occupational health and safety incidents. An evaluation of trends and patterns may also indicate potential workplace inequity.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the workforce injury rate (the number of injuries per million hours worked by male workers in the reporting period). </strong></p><p>\"Lost time injury rates\" are not appropriate for this metric, this metric is about recording the <strong>number of injuries</strong>. If this is presented as a ratio other than \"per million hours worked\", please convert it to \"per million hours worked\".</p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong><br>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.<br></p><ul><li><p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL F, Command F or search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p></li><li><p>Use G4 codes, G3 codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. G4-LA6 or LA6, male injury rate or male IR</p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value</p></li><li><p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p></p><p><strong>Global Reporting Initiative compliance guidance for companies:</strong></p><p>To calculate the male injury rate - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/occupational-health-and-safety/Pages/G4-LA6.aspx|G4-LA6]]-a:</p><ul><li><p>Identify the injury rate (IR) experienced during the reporting period by gender</p></li><li><p>Report this information for the total male workforce (that is total employees and supervised workers)</p></li></ul><p>Reporting on this Indicator should include the following contextual information as a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>G4-LA6-c: ​The system of rules applied in recording and reporting accident statistics.</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.8 Protect labour rights and ensure safe, secure working environments for all workers, including migrants."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1141,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 33,
      "companies": 714,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Male_injury_rate_G4_LA6_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837515,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Female Worker Fatalities (G4-LA6-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Female_Worker_Fatalities_G4_LA6_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Female Worker Fatalities (G4-LA6-a)",
      "question": "How many female workers died because of a work-related incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/occupational-health-and-safety/Pages/G4-LA6.aspx | G4-LA6]] - 'Type of injury and rates of injury, occupational diseases, lost days, and absenteeism, and total number of<strong> work-related fatalities</strong>, by region and <strong>by gender</strong>'.</p>\r\n<p>This indicator also asks for type of injury, occupational diseases, lost days, and absenteeism, and number of work-related fatalities, by region and by gender, for the total workforce (total employees plus supervised workers) and for independed contractors working on-site). (G4-LA6-a, G4-LA6-b)</p>\r\n<p>Health and safety performance is a key measure of an organization’s duty of care. Low injury and absentee rates are generally linked to positive trends in staff morale and productivity. This Indicator shows whether health and safety management practices are resulting in fewer occupational health and safety incidents. An evaluation of trends and patterns may also indicate potential workplace inequity.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the number of female workers who died due to a work related incident:</strong></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong><br>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.<br></p><ul><li><p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL F, Command F or search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p></li><li><p>Use G4 codes, G3 codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. G4-LA6 or LA6, female fatalities or fatal incidents with female employees</p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value</p></li><li><p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p></p><p><strong>Global Reporting Initiative compliance guidance for companies:</strong></p><p>To calculate the total number of work related female fatalities - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/occupational-health-and-safety/Pages/G4-LA6.aspx|G4-LA6]]-a:</p><ul><li><p>Identify the absolute number of female fatalities that occurred during the reporting period.</p></li><li><p>Report this information for the total female workforce (that is, total employees plus supervised workers).</p></li></ul><p>Reporting on this Indicator should include the following contextual information as a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>G4-LA6-c: Report the system of rules applied in recording and reporting accident statistics.</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.8 Protect labour rights and ensure safe, secure working environments for all workers, including migrants."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2444,
      "bookmarkers": 7,
      "datasets": 42,
      "companies": 1006,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Social_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Female_Worker_Fatalities_G4_LA6_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 837526,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Male Worker Fatalities (G4-LA6-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Male_Worker_Fatalities_G4_LA6_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Male Worker Fatalities (G4-LA6-a)",
      "question": "How many male workers died because of a work-related incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/occupational-health-and-safety/Pages/G4-LA6.aspx | G4-LA6]] - 'Type of injury and rates of injury, occupational diseases, lost days, and absenteeism, and total number of<strong> work-related fatalities</strong>, by region and <strong>by gender</strong>'.</p>\r\n<p>This indicator also asks for type of injury, occupational diseases, lost days, and absenteeism, and number of work-related fatalities, by region and by gender, for the total workforce (total employees plus supervised workers) and for independed contractors working on-site). (G4-LA6-a, G4-LA6-b)</p>\r\n<p>Health and safety performance is a key measure of an organization’s duty of care. Low injury and absentee rates are generally linked to positive trends in staff morale and productivity. This Indicator shows whether health and safety management practices are resulting in fewer occupational health and safety incidents. An evaluation of trends and patterns may also indicate potential workplace inequity.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the number of male workers who died due to a work related incident:</strong></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong><br>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.<br></p><ul><li><p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL F, Command F or search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p></li><li><p>Use G4 codes, G3 codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. G4-LA6 or LA6, male fatalities or fatal incidents with male employees</p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value</p></li><li><p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p></p><p><strong>Global Reporting Initiative compliance guidance for companies:</strong></p><p>To calculate the total number of work related male fatalities - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/occupational-health-and-safety/Pages/G4-LA6.aspx|G4-LA6]]-a:</p><ul><li><p>Identify the absolute number of male fatalities that occurred during the reporting period.</p></li><li><p>Report this information for the total male workforce (that is, total employees plus supervised workers).</p></li></ul><p>Reporting on this Indicator should include the following contextual information as a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>G4-LA6-c: Report the system of rules applied in recording and reporting accident statistics.</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 403 - Occupational Health and Safety",
        "GRI Standards+403-9 Work-related injuries",
        "GRI Standards+403-9-a-i Number and rate of fatalities as a result of work-related injury",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.8 Protect labour rights and ensure safe, secure working environments for all workers, including migrants."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2494,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 42,
      "companies": 1040,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Social_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Male_Worker_Fatalities_G4_LA6_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 840076,
      "name": "Amnesty International+Discloses Smelters and Refiners",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Discloses_Smelters_and_Refiners.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "Discloses Smelters and Refiners",
      "question": "Does the company publish a list of the smelters/refiners they have identified in their supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": "<p>Identify if the company has published a list of the smelters/refiners they have identified in their supply chain. It sometimes appears in an annex near the end of the document (in a table like the one below).</p><p>{{Example-Table|size:large}}</p><p>Then input the relevant value from the list below:</p><ul><li><p><strong>Yes</strong> - where the company publishes a list that includes all of their smelters/refiners.</p></li><li><p><strong>Some</strong> - where the company reports a partial list.</p></li><li><p><strong>No</strong> - where the company does not include a list of smelters/refiners in their report.</p><p>If the company includes a list of smelters/refiners, <strong>please copy and paste this</strong> into a comment on your answer. We can run text analysis on these comments to build a profile of the relationships between companies and smelters/refiners. Don’t worry about the formatting of your comment, it is for machines rather than humans to read, and as long as it contains the names of smelters/refiners it will be fine.</p><p></p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Some"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 82,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 74,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Discloses_Smelters_and_Refiners.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Discloses_Smelters_and_Refiners+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 842811,
      "name": "Amnesty International+CMR DRC Conflict Status",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_DRC_Conflict_Status.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "CMR DRC Conflict Status",
      "question": "What overall status did the company report in relation to Conflict Minerals?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The following comes from the  Securities and Exchange Commission's [[https://www.sec.gov/News/Article/Detail/Article/1365171562058 | |Conflict Minerals Fact Sheet]]:</p>\r\n<p><strong><em>What Must Be Included in the Conflict Minerals Report:</em></strong></p>\r\n<p>Under the final rule, companies that are required to file a Conflict Minerals Report (CMR) must exercise due diligence on the source and chain of custody of their conflict minerals. The due diligence measures must conform to a nationally or internationally recognised due diligence framework, such as the due diligence guidance approved by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).</p>\r\n<p><em>DRC Conflict Free — </em>If a company determines that its products are “Democratic Republic of Congo conflict free” — that is the minerals may originate from the [[https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2012/34-67716.pdf| covered countries]] but did not finance or benefit armed groups — then the company must undertake the following audit and certification requirements:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Obtain an independent private sector audit of its Conflict Minerals Report</li>\r\n<li>Certify that it obtained such an audit.</li>\r\n<li>Include the audit report as part of the Conflict Minerals Report.</li>\r\n<li>Identify the auditor.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><em>Not Been Found to Be “DRC Conflict Free” —</em> If a company’s products have not been found to be “DRC conflict free,” then the company in addition to the audit and certification requirements must describe the following in its Conflict Minerals Report:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>The products manufactured or contracted to be manufactured that have not been found to be “DRC conflict free.”</li>\r\n<li>The facilities used to process the conflict minerals in those products.</li>\r\n<li>The country of origin of the conflict minerals in those products.</li>\r\n<li>The efforts to determine the mine or location of origin with the greatest possible specificity.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><em>DRC Conflict Undeterminable</em> — For a temporary two-year period (or four-year period for smaller reporting companies), if the company is unable to determine whether the minerals in its products originated in the covered countries or financed or benefited armed groups in those countries, then those products are considered “DRC conflict undeterminable.”</p>\r\n<p>In that case, the company must describe the following in its Conflict Minerals Report:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Its products manufactured or contracted to be manufactured that are “DRC conflict undeterminable.”</li>\r\n<li>The facilities used to process the conflict minerals in those products, if known.</li>\r\n<li>The country of origin of the conflict minerals in those products, if known.</li>\r\n<li>The efforts to determine the mine or location of origin with the greatest possible specificity.</li>\r\n<li>The steps it has taken or will take, if any, since the end of the period covered in its most recent Conflict Minerals Report to mitigate the risk that its necessary conflict minerals benefit armed groups, including any steps to improve due diligence.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>For those products that are “DRC conflict undeterminable,” the company is not required to obtain an independent private sector audit of the Conflict Minerals Report regarding the conflict minerals in those products.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company's 'specialised disclosure' (SD) filing should include a statement of how they view their current status with regards to conflict minerals. This statement determines which additional information the company should report. Search the report for the Democratic Republic of Congo and its abbreviated acronym DRC.</p>\r\n<p>The language used in the filing should be a close match for one of the following categories* (please select one these as a value):</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>DRC Conflict Free </strong>- <span> if</span> this value applies, note in a comment to the value which auditor provided the certification.</li>\r\n<li><strong>Not Been Found to Be \"DRC Conflict Free\"</strong></li>\r\n<li><strong>DRC Conflict Undeterminable</strong></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> *If unclear please add the relevant quote as a comment to the value.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "DRC Conflict Free",
        "Not Been Found to Be \"DRC Conflict Free\"",
        "DRC Conflict Undeterminable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_DRC_Conflict_Status+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 842971,
      "name": "Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP)+US effective Federal tax rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Institute_on_Taxation_and_Economic_Policy_ITEP+US_effective_Federal_tax_rate.json",
      "designer": "Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP)",
      "title": "US effective Federal tax rate",
      "question": "What was the effective rate of US Federal tax paid by the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric represents data published by Citizens for Tax Justice - see [[http://www.ctj.org/corporatetaxdodgers/sorrystateofcorptaxes.php|this page]] for more information. Below is taken from the same page:</p>\r\n<p><span>Profitable corporations are supposed to pay a 35 percent federal income tax rate on their U.S. profits. But many corporations pay far less, or nothing at all, because of the many tax loopholes and special breaks they enjoy. This report documents just how successful many Fortune 500 corporations have been at using these loopholes and special breaks over the past five years.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>The report looks at the profits and U.S. federal income taxes of the 288 Fortune 500 companies that have been consistently profitable in each of the five years between 2008 and 2012, excluding companies that experienced even one unprofitable year during this period. Most of these companies were included in our November 2011 report, <em>Corporate Taxpayers and Corporate Tax Dodgers</em>, which looked at the years 2008 through 2010. Our new report is broader, in that it includes companies, such as Facebook, that have entered the Fortune 500 since 2011, and narrower, in that it excludes some companies that were profitable during 2008 to 2010 but lost money in 2011 or 2012.</span></p>\r\n<p><strong><em><span>Some Key Findings:</span></em></strong></p>\r\n<p><span>• As a group, the 288 corporations examined paid an effective federal income tax rate of just 19.4 percent over the five-year period — far less than the statutory 35 percent tax rate.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>• Twenty-six of the corporations, including Boeing, General Electric, Priceline.com and Verizon, paid no federal income tax at all over the five year period. A third of the corporations (93) paid an effective tax rate of less than ten percent over that period.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>• Of those corporations in our sample with significant offshore profits, two thirds paid higher corporate tax rates to foreign governments where they operate than they paid in the U.S. on their U.S. profits.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>These findings refute the prevailing view inside the Washington, D.C. Beltway that America’s corporate income tax is more burdensome than the corporate income taxes levied by other countries, and that this purported (but false) excess burden somehow makes the U.S. “uncompetitive.”</span></p>\r\n<p><strong><em><span>Other Findings:</span></em></strong></p>\r\n<p><span>• One hundred and eleven of the 288 companies (39 percent of them) paid zero or less in federal income taxes in at least one year from 2008 to 2012.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>• The sectors with the lowest effective corporate tax rates over the five-year period were utilities (2.9 percent), industrial machinery (4.3 percent), telecommunications (9.8 percent), oil, gas and pipelines (14.4 percent), transportation (16.4 percent), aerospace and defense (16.7 percent) and financial (18.8 percent).</span></p>\r\n<p><span>• The tax breaks claimed by these companies are highly concentrated in the hands of a few very large corporations. Just 25 companies claimed $174 billion in tax breaks over the five years between 2008 and 2012. That’s almost half the $364 billion in tax subsidies claimed by all of the 288 companies in our sample.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>• Five companies — Wells Fargo, AT&amp;T, IBM, General Electric, and Verizon — enjoyed over $77 billion in tax breaks during this five-year period.</span></p>\r\n<p><strong><em><span>Recommendations for Reform:</span></em></strong></p>\r\n<p><span>• Congress should repeal the rule allowing American multinational corporations to indefinitely “defer” their U.S. taxes on their offshore profits. This reform would effectively remove the tax incentive to shift profits and jobs overseas.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>• Limit the ability of tech and other companies to use executive stock options to reduce their taxes by generating phantom “costs” these companies never actually incur.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>• Having allowed “bonus depreciation” to expire at the end of 2013, Congress could take the next step and repeal the rest of accelerated depreciation, too.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>• Reinstate a strong corporate Alternative Minimum Tax that really does the job it was originally designed to do.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>• Require more complete and transparent geography-specific public disclosure of corporate income and tax payments than the Securities and Exchange Commission’s regulations currently mandate.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric expresses the estimated amount of US Federal tax paid by the company as a percentage of their estimated domestic profits.</p>\r\n<p>The [[http://www.ctj.org/corporatetaxdodgers/sorrystateofcorptaxes.php#Methodology|Methodology section on this page]] has details of how these estimates were generated.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1118,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 224,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Institute_on_Taxation_and_Economic_Policy_ITEP+US_effective_Federal_tax_rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 843077,
      "name": "Amnesty International+CMR Covers Diamonds",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Covers_Diamonds.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "CMR Covers Diamonds",
      "question": "Does the company’s conflict minerals due diligence consider the sourcing of diamonds?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Under US law, certain companies are required to file with the US Securities &amp; Exchange Commission (SEC) a report that describes their efforts to responsibly source tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold (3TG) from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries - called a \"Conflict Minerals Report\". If a company's Conflict Minerals Report also covers other minerals this would be a good sign that they take the issue seriously and are willing to go beyond the legal requirements. </p>\r\n<p>This metric is asking whether the company's Conflict Minerals Report covers diamonds.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Search the company's Conflict Minerals Report for the word \"diamonds\". If diamonds are mentioned, read the surrounding information to determine if diamonds are simply mentioned in passing (e.g. in the name of one of their smelters/refiners) or whether the company is taking steps to source copper responsibly.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>If it is clear that the company is taking steps to source diamonds responsibly, the answer for this metric is <strong>Yes</strong>.</li>\r\n<li>If diamonds are not mentioned or only in passing enter <strong>No</strong> as the value.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 53,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 51,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Covers_Diamonds+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 843097,
      "name": "Amnesty International+CMR Covers Cobalt",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Covers_Cobalt.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "CMR Covers Cobalt",
      "question": "Does the company’s conflict minerals due diligence consider the sourcing of Cobalt?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Under US law, certain companies are required to file with the US Securities &amp; Exchange Commission (SEC) a report that describes their efforts to responsibly source tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold (3TG) from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries - called a \"Conflict Minerals Report\". If a company's Conflict Minerals Report also covers other minerals this would be a good sign that they take the issue seriously and are willing to go beyond the legal requirements. </p>\r\n<p>This metric is asking whether the company's Conflict Minerals Report covers cobalt.</p>",
      "methodology": "<div>\r\n<p>Search the company's Conflict Minerals Report for the word \"cobalt\". If cobalt is mentioned, read the surrounding information to determine if cobalt is simply mentioned in passing (e.g. in the name of one of their smelters/refiners) or whether the company is taking steps to source cobalt responsibly.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>If it is clear that the company is taking steps to source cobalt responsibly, the answer for this metric is <strong>Yes</strong>.</span></li>\r\n<li><span></span>If cobalt is not mentioned or only in passing enter <strong>No</strong> as the value.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</div>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 53,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Covers_Cobalt+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 843110,
      "name": "Amnesty International+CMR Covers Coal",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Covers_Coal.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "CMR Covers Coal",
      "question": "Does the company’s conflict minerals due diligence consider the sourcing of Coal?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Under US law, certain companies are required to file with the US Securities &amp; Exchange Commission (SEC) a report that describes their efforts to responsibly source tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold (3TG) from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries - called a \"Conflict Minerals Report\". If a company's Conflict Minerals Report also covers other minerals this would be a good sign that they take the issue seriously and are willing to go beyond the legal requirements. </p>\r\n<p>This metric is asking whether the company's Conflict Minerals Report covers coal.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Search the company's Conflict Minerals Report for the word \"coal\". If coal is mentioned, read the surrounding information to determine if coal is simply mentioned in passing (e.g. in the name of one of their smelters/refiners) or whether the company is taking steps to source coal responsibly.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>If it is clear that the company is taking steps to source coal responsibly, the answer for this metric is <strong>Yes</strong>.</span></li>\r\n<li><span></span>If coal is not mentioned or only in passing enter <strong>No</strong> as the value.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Amnesty International+CMR Covers Coal+Srivigneshwar R Prasad"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 53,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Covers_Coal+Srivigneshwar_R_Prasad.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Covers_Coal+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 846580,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Total energy consumption, GRI 302-1-e (formerly G4-EN3-e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_energy_consumption_GRI_302_1_e_formerly_G4_EN3_e.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Total energy consumption, GRI 302-1-e (formerly G4-EN3-e)",
      "question": "What is the company's total energy consumption (in gigajoules)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090311\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 302</a> addresses the topic of energy. An organization can consume energy in various forms, such as fuel, electricity, heating, cooling or steam. Energy can be self-generated or purchased from external sources and it can come from renewable sources (such as wind, hydro or solar) or from non-renewable sources (such as coal, petroleum or natural gas).</p>\r\n<p>Using energy more efficiently and opting for renewable energy sources is essential for combating climate change and for lowering an organization’s overall environmental footprint. The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to energy, and how it manages them.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">G4-EN3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, and the </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">new GRI 302-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Total_energy_consumption_within_the_organization_G4_EN3_e_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question, you are being asked to identify the total energy consumption of the organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p>Start by looking for publicly available documents that may contain this information, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Annual Report (with Non-Financial Data)</li>\r\n<li>ESG Report</li>\r\n<li>Impact Report</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability Report</li>\r\n<li>Climate Disclosure</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\"><strong>Do NOT use the following reports</strong></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Form 10-K</li>\r\n<li>Annual Information Form (if it contains only financial data)</li>\r\n<li>Interim Report</li>\r\n<li>Quarterly Report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords and search terms for this metric</strong></p>\r\n<p>- Energy</p>\r\n<p>- Fuel</p>\r\n<p>- 302-1</p>\r\n<p>- GRI</p>\r\n<p>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong></p>\r\n<p>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Units</strong></p>\r\n<p>Companies may report energy consumption in hundreds, thousands or millions of gigajoules, joules, MWh or GWh. <strong>The answer for this metric must be entered into Wikirate in gigajoules (GJ)</strong>. Make sure you check the unit of measurement and do any conversions necessary. Enter the full number into the answer field.</p>\r\n<p>E.g. If the company reports its energy consumption as '500,000 MWh' the answer should be converted to GJ and entered on Wikirate as '1800000 gigajoules'</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Gigajoules",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 302 - Energy",
        "GRI Standards+302-1 Energy consumption within the organization",
        "GRI Standards+302-1-e Energy consumption within the organization",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E1 - Climate Change",
        "ESRS Standards+E1.5 - Actions and resources in relation to climate change",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG7 - Affordable and Clean Energy",
        "UN SDGs+SDG7.2 Substantially increase the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG7.3 Double the global rate of improvement in energy efficiency.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.4 Improve global resource efficiency and decouple economic growth from environmental degradation.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.2 Achieve sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.6 Encourage companies to adopt sustainable practices and include sustainability information in their reporting.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13: Climate Action",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13.2 Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning."
      ],
      "scores": [
        "Global Reporting Initiative+Total energy consumption, GRI 302-1-e (formerly G4-EN3-e)+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3916,
      "bookmarkers": 23,
      "datasets": 111,
      "companies": 1356,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_energy_consumption_GRI_302_1_e_formerly_G4_EN3_e+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Environmental_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Energy_Consumption.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Emissions_and_Energy_Disclosure.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/theresah+reported_renewable_breakdown.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/theresah+Total_Renewable_Energy_Use.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Total_Renewable_Energy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Climate_Action_Research+Renewables_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Wollongong_Research_Group_2020+Wollongong_2020_Climate_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Higher_School_of_Economics_Research_Group_2020+From_Farm_to_Fork_2020_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Energy_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Energy_Consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_energy_consumption_GRI_302_1_e_formerly_G4_EN3_e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 848767,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Total Waste Generated, GRI 306-2 (formerly G4-EN23-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_Waste_Generated_GRI_306_2_formerly_G4_EN23_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Total Waste Generated, GRI 306-2 (formerly G4-EN23-a)",
      "question": "What is the total amount of waste generated by the organization (in metric tonnes)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The full set can be downloaded at </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-EN23-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">code</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">306-2 </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><em>Waste by type and disposal method</em></span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Waste_Generated_Recycled_EN23_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"font-size: 1rem; background-color: #ffffff;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water, and ecosystems.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090313\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 306</a> addresses the topic of <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">effluents and waste</span>. This includes water discharges; the generation, treatment and disposal of waste; and spills of chemicals, oils, fuels, and other substances.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The generation, treatment and disposal of waste – including its improper transportation – can pose harm to human health and the environment. This is of particular concern if waste is transported to countries lacking the infrastructure and regulations to handle it.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to effluents and waste, and how it manages these impacts.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question you need to identify the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">total waste created</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bold;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bold;\">(in tonnes)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> by the organization </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. <br></span></p>\r\n<p>Start by looking for publicly available documents that may contain this information, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Annual Report (with Non-Financial Data)</li>\r\n<li>ESG Report</li>\r\n<li>Impact Report</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability Report</li>\r\n<li>Climate Disclosure</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\"><strong>Do NOT use the following reports</strong></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Form 10-K</li>\r\n<li>Annual Information Form (if it contains only financial data)</li>\r\n<li>Interim Report</li>\r\n<li>Quarterly Report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> &amp; search terms: <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Waste</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, GRI, 306-2, EN23</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">calculations or conversions </span>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report the <em>volume</em> in thousands of cubic metres, or using a unit other than cubic meters. If this is the case, convert units to cubic meters (see website below), or add the number of zeros indicated, and fill in the total number in the answer field - e.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500000'. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://convertunits.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Metric Tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 306 - Waste 2020",
        "GRI Standards+306-3 Waste generated"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3759,
      "bookmarkers": 20,
      "datasets": 119,
      "companies": 1336,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Environmental_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Percentage_of_waste_recycled.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Higher_School_of_Economics_Research_Group_2020+From_Farm_to_Fork_2020_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_Waste_Generated_GRI_306_2_formerly_G4_EN23_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 848876,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Total Waste to Landfill, GRI 306-2 (formerly G4-EN23-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_Waste_to_Landfill_GRI_306_2_formerly_G4_EN23_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Total Waste to Landfill, GRI 306-2 (formerly G4-EN23-a)",
      "question": "What is the total waste from the organization going to a landfill (in metric tonnes)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The full set can be downloaded at </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-EN23-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">code</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">306-2 </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><em>Waste by type and disposal method</em></span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Waste_Generated_Recycled_EN23_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"font-size: 1rem; background-color: #ffffff;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water, and ecosystems.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090313\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 306</a> addresses the topic of <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">effluents and waste</span>. This includes water discharges; the generation, treatment and disposal of waste; and spills of chemicals, oils, fuels, and other substances.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The generation, treatment and disposal of waste – including its improper transportation – can pose harm to human health and the environment. This is of particular concern if waste is transported to countries lacking the infrastructure and regulations to handle it.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to effluents and waste, and how it manages these impacts.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question you need to identify the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">total waste to landfill (in</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bold;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bold;\">tonnes)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> reported by the organization </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. <br></span></p>\r\n<p>Start by looking for publicly available documents that may contain this information, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Annual Report (with Non-Financial Data)</li>\r\n<li>ESG Report</li>\r\n<li>Impact Report</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability Report</li>\r\n<li>Climate Disclosure</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\"><strong>Do NOT use the following reports</strong></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Form 10-K</li>\r\n<li>Annual Information Form (if it contains only financial data)</li>\r\n<li>Interim Report</li>\r\n<li>Quarterly Report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> &amp; search terms: <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Waste, Landfill</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, GRI, 306-2, EN23</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">calculations or conversions </span>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report the <em>volume</em> in thousands of cubic metres, or using a unit other than cubic meters. If this is the case, convert units to cubic meters (see website below), or add the number of zeros indicated, and fill in the total number in the answer field - e.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500000'. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://convertunits.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 306 - Effluents and Waste 2016",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 306 - Waste 2020",
        "GRI Standards+306-2 Management of significant waste-related impacts",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.4 Ensure environmentally sound management of chemicals and waste and reduce their release to air, water, and soil."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2540,
      "bookmarkers": 11,
      "datasets": 72,
      "companies": 915,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_Waste_to_Landfill_GRI_306_2_formerly_G4_EN23_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 849019,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Occupational Risk (G4-LA7)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Occupational_Risk_G4_LA7.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Occupational Risk (G4-LA7)",
      "question": "What is the number of workers with high incidence or high risk of diseases related to their occupation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines.</span> It covers the reporting requirements of Indicator <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/occupational-health-and-safety/Pages/G4-LA7.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-LA7</a> – ‘Workers with high incidence or high risk of diseases related to their occupation’.</p>\r\n<p>As part of a preventative strategy for managing the health and safety of its workforce, this Indicator is relevant for all organizations. It has specific relevance for organizations working in countries with a high risk or incidence of communicable diseases, and those in professions that have a high incidence of specific diseases. Preventing serious diseases contributes to the health, satisfaction, and stability of the workforce, and helps maintain the organization’s social license to operate in a community or region.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Identify the number of workers with high incidence or high risk of diseases related to their occupation - <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/occupational-health-and-safety/Pages/G4-LA7.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-LA7</a>. If multiple values are reported, calculate total number and include calculation methodology in the comments.</p>\r\n<p><span><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> </span><span>for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 403 - Occupational Health and Safety",
        "GRI Standards+403-10 Work-related ill health",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.8 Protect labour rights and ensure safe, secure working environments for all workers, including migrants."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 405,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 18,
      "companies": 225,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Occupational_Risk_G4_LA7+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 849130,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Significant Spills, GRI 306-3-a (formerly G4-EN24-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Significant_Spills_GRI_306_3_a_formerly_G4_EN24_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Significant Spills, GRI 306-3-a (formerly G4-EN24-a)",
      "question": "What is the total number of recorded significant spills?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The full set can be downloaded at </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-EN24-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">code</span> <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">306-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <a href=\"/Significant%20Spills%20(G4-EN24)%20Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water, and ecosystems. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090313\" target=\"_blank\"><em>GRI 306</em></a> addresses the topic of <strong>effluents and waste</strong>. This includes water discharges; the generation, treatment and disposal of waste; and spills of chemicals, oils, fuels, and other substances.</p>\r\n<p>The generation, treatment and disposal of waste – including its improper transportation – can also pose harm to human health and the environment. This is of particular concern if waste is transported to countries lacking the infrastructure and regulations to handle it. <strong>Spills</strong> of chemicals, oils, and fuels, among other substances, can potentially affect soil, water, air, biodiversity, and human health.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question you need to identify the total <strong>number of</strong><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> significant spills</span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> </span>reported by the organization <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> and search terms: Chemical, Spills, GRI, 306-3, Effluents, Waste</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">calculations or conversions </span>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report the <em>volume</em> in thousands of cubic metres, or using a unit other than cubic meters. If this is the case, convert units to cubic meters (see website below), or add the number of zeros indicated, and fill in the total number in the answer field - e.g. If the company says '0.5 million cubic meters' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500000'. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://convertunits.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "spills",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 306 - Effluents and Waste 2016",
        "GRI Standards+306-3 Significant spills",
        "GRI Standards+306-3-a Recorded significant spills"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1080,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 54,
      "companies": 396,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Significant_Spills_GRI_306_3_a_formerly_G4_EN24_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 849170,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Risk for Incidents of Forced or Compulsory Labor, by Operation (G4-HR6-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Risk_for_Incidents_of_Forced_or_Compulsory_Labor_by_Operation_G4_HR6_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Risk for Incidents of Forced or Compulsory Labor, by Operation (G4-HR6-a)",
      "question": "Which type of operations and/or suppliers were identified as having significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/human-rights/forced-or-compulsory-labor/Pages/G4-HR6.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-HR6</a> - '</span><strong>Operations and suppliers identified as having significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor</strong>, and measures to contribute to the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labor'.</p>\r\n<p>Not to be subjected to forced or compulsory labor is considered a fundamental human right and is a provision of the UN ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights' (<a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#97\" target=\"_blank\">97</a>) and subject to ILO Conventions 29 'Forced Labour Convention' (<a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#24\" target=\"_blank\">24</a>) and 105 'Abolition of Forced Labour Convention' (<a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#29\" target=\"_blank\">29</a>). Forced or compulsory labor exists in a variety of forms and the data provided will indicate the organization’s challenges in contributing to the elimination of such labor.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Identify operations and suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor, <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/human-rights/forced-or-compulsory-labor/Pages/G4-HR6.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-HR6</a>-a, in terms of:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Type of operations</strong> (such as manufacturing plant) and <strong>suppliers*</strong> (another metric exists for 'Countries or geographical areas with operations and suppliers considered at risk')</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>The process of identification reflects the organization’s approach to risk assessment on this issue and may draw from recognized international data sources such as the ILO<em> Information and reports on the application of Conventions and Recommendations</em> (<a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#57\" target=\"_blank\">57</a>).</p>\r\n<p>If company reported on measures to contribute to the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labor (<a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/human-rights/forced-or-compulsory-labor/Pages/G4-HR6.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-HR6</a><span>-b)</span><span> include relevant quote or page number in the comments. For further guidance on how companies may report this, see the ILO ‘Tripartite Declaration of Principles Concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy' (</span><a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#64\" target=\"_blank\">64</a><span>) and OECD </span><em>Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises</em><span> (</span><a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#73\" target=\"_blank\">73</a><span>).</span></p>\r\n<p>*If specific suppliers are reported, include these in comments.</p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Manufacturing",
        "Merchandising",
        "Service",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 409 - Forced or Compulsory Labor",
        "GRI Standards+409-1 Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor",
        "GRI Standards+409-1-a Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 27,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Risk_for_Incidents_of_Forced_or_Compulsory_Labor_by_Operation_G4_HR6_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 849506,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Risk for Incidents of Forced or Compulsory Labor, by place (G4-HR6-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Risk_for_Incidents_of_Forced_or_Compulsory_Labor_by_place_G4_HR6_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Risk for Incidents of Forced or Compulsory Labor, by place (G4-HR6-a)",
      "question": "\r\nFrom which country or geographic area do operations and suppliers considered at risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor come?\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<div>\r\n<p><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/human-rights/forced-or-compulsory-labor/Pages/G4-HR6.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-HR6</a> - '</span><strong>Operations and suppliers identified as having significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor</strong>, and measures to contribute to the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labor'.</p>\r\n<p>Not to be subjected to forced or compulsory labor is considered a fundamental human right and is a provision of the UN ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights' (<a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#97\" target=\"_blank\">97</a>) and subject to ILO Conventions 29 'Forced Labour Convention' (<a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#24\" target=\"_blank\">24</a>) and 105 'Abolition of Forced Labour Convention' (<a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#29\" target=\"_blank\">29</a>). Forced or compulsory labor exists in a variety of forms and the data provided will indicate the organization’s challenges in contributing to the elimination of such labor.</p>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": "<div>\r\n<p>Identify operations and suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor, <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/human-rights/forced-or-compulsory-labor/Pages/G4-HR6.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-HR6</a>-a, in terms of:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Countries or geographical areas</strong> (another metric exists for 'type of operations and suppliers')</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>The process of identification reflects the organization’s approach to risk assessment on this issue and may draw from recognized international data sources such as the ILO<em> Information and reports on the application of Conventions and Recommendations</em> (<a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#57\" target=\"_blank\">57</a>).</p>\r\n<p>If company reported on measures to contribute to the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labor (<a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/human-rights/forced-or-compulsory-labor/Pages/G4-HR6.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-HR6</a>-b) include relevant quote or page number in the comments. For further guidance on how companies may report this, see the ILO ‘Tripartite Declaration of Principles Concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy' (<a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#64\" target=\"_blank\">64</a>) and OECD <em>Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises</em> (<a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#73\" target=\"_blank\">73</a>).</p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</div>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 27,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Risk_for_Incidents_of_Forced_or_Compulsory_Labor_by_place_G4_HR6_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 849548,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Volume of Significant Spills, GRI 306-3-a (formerly G4-EN24-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Volume_of_Significant_Spills_GRI_306_3_a_formerly_G4_EN24_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Volume of Significant Spills, GRI 306-3-a (formerly G4-EN24-b)",
      "question": "What is the total volume of recorded significant spills in cubic meters?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The full set can be downloaded at </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"font-size: 15.2px; background-color: #ffffff;\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards.</span> For this metric, the code G4-EN24-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">code</span> <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">306-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <a href=\"/Significant%20Spills%20(G4-EN24)%20Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water, and ecosystems. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090313\" target=\"_blank\"><em>GRI 306</em></a> addresses the topic of <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">effluents and waste</span>. This includes water discharges; the generation, treatment and disposal of waste; and spills of chemicals, oils, fuels, and other substances.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The generation, treatment and disposal of waste – including its improper transportation – can also pose harm to human health and the environment. This is of particular concern if waste is transported to countries lacking the infrastructure and regulations to handle it. <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Spills</span> of chemicals, oils, and fuels, among other substances, can potentially affect soil, water, air, biodiversity, and human health.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question you need to identify the total <strong>volume of significant spills</strong><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> </span>reported by the organization <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> and search terms: Chemical, Spills, GRI, 306-3, Effluents, Waste</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">calculations or conversions </span>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report the <em>volume</em> in thousands of cubic metres, or using a unit other than cubic meters. If this is the case, convert units to cubic meters (see website below), or add the number of zeros indicated, and fill in the total number in the answer field - e.g. If the company says '0.5 million cubic meters' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500000'. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://convertunits.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 306 - Effluents and Waste 2016",
        "GRI Standards+306-3 Significant spills",
        "GRI Standards+306-3-a Recorded significant spills"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 518,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 32,
      "companies": 270,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Volume_of_Significant_Spills_GRI_306_3_a_formerly_G4_EN24_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 849642,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 3), GRI 305-3 (formerly G4-EN17-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Indirect_greenhouse_gas_GHG_emissions_Scope_3_GRI_305_3_formerly_G4_EN17_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 3), GRI 305-3 (formerly G4-EN17-a)",
      "question": "What is the amount of other indirect (Scope 3) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in tons of CO2 equivalent) that the organization is indirectly responsible for?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards).</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">G4-EN17-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span>, and the new </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">GRI 305-3</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span>. The </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <a href=\"/Indirect_greenhouse_gas_GHG_emissions_Scope_3_G4_EN17_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water and ecosystems.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000089851\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 305</a> addresses emissions into air, which are the discharge of substances from a source into the atmosphere. Types of emissions include: greenhouse gas (GHG), ozone-depleting substances (ODS), and nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur oxides (SOX), among other significant air emissions.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">GHG emissions are a major contributor to climate change and are governed by the United Nations (UN) ‘Framework Convention on Climate Change’ and the subsequent UN ‘Kyoto Protocol’. This Standard covers the following GHGs:</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>Carbon dioxide (CO2)</li>\r\n<li>Methane (CH4)</li>\r\n<li>Nitrous oxide (N2O)</li>\r\n<li>Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)</li>\r\n<li>Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)</li>\r\n<li>Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)</li>\r\n<li>Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3)</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Some GHGs, including methane, are also air pollutants that have significant adverse impacts on ecosystems, air quality, agriculture, and human and animal health.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">As a result, different national and international regulations and incentive systems, such as emissions trading, aim to control the volume and reward the reduction of GHG emissions.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The GHG Protocol has established a classification of GHG emissions called ‘Scope’: Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3. The GHG emissions standard published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ‘ISO 14064’, represents these classifications of Scope with the following terms:</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>Direct GHG emissions (<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Scope 1</span>): GHG emissions from sources that are owned or controlled by an organization</li>\r\n<li>Energy indirect GHG emissions (<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Scope 2</span>): GHG emissions that result from the generation of purchased or acquired electricity, heating, cooling, and steam consumed by an organization</li>\r\n<li>Other indirect GHG emissions (<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Scope 3</span>): Indirect GHG emissions not included in energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions that occur outside of the organization, including both upstream and downstream emissions</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Instructions</strong></p>\r\n<p>To answer this metric question, you need to identify the <strong>Indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3)</strong> of the organization for a specific year.</p>\r\n<p>Start by looking for <span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>PUBLICLY AVAILABLE </strong></span>documents that may contain this information, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Annual Report (with Non-Financial Data)</li>\r\n<li>ESG Report</li>\r\n<li>Impact Report</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability Report</li>\r\n<li>Climate Disclosure</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\"><strong>Do NOT use the following reports:</strong></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Form 10-K</li>\r\n<li>Annual Information Form (if it contains only financial data)</li>\r\n<li>Interim Report</li>\r\n<li>Quarterly Report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric: </span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>GHG</li>\r\n<li>Emissions</li>\r\n<li>GRI</li>\r\n<li>GRI Index</li>\r\n<li>305-3 </li>\r\n<li>EN17</li>\r\n<li>Scope 3</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations: </span>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If any calculations or unit conversions are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> where you found the answer.</span> Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report their GHG emissions in hundreds, thousands or millions of tonnes. <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Make sure you check the unit of measurement and enter the full number into the answer field</span>.</p>\r\n<p>E.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes CO2e' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500,000 tonnes'</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2 equivalent",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 305 - Emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-3 Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-3-a Gross other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG3 - Good Health and Well-Being",
        "UN SDGs+SDG3.9 Reduce deaths and illnesses from hazardous chemicals and pollution of air, water, and soil.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.4 Ensure environmentally sound management of chemicals and waste and reduce their release to air, water, and soil."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3512,
      "bookmarkers": 25,
      "datasets": 106,
      "companies": 1222,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Environmental_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Combined_Scope_1_2_and_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_GHG.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Emissions_and_Energy_Disclosure.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Wollongong_Research_Group_2020+Wollongong_2020_Climate_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Indirect_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_2_and_Scope_3_combined_per_Vehicle_Produced.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Emissions_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Gershon_M_Bialer+CO2e_Intensity.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Scope_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Indirect_greenhouse_gas_GHG_emissions_Scope_3_GRI_305_3_formerly_G4_EN17_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 884991,
      "name": "Rajinder Singh Randhawa+Business Responsibility Index (India)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Rajinder_Singh_Randhawa+Business_Responsibility_Index_India.json",
      "designer": "Rajinder Singh Randhawa",
      "title": "Business Responsibility Index (India)",
      "question": "",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Rajinder_Singh_Randhawa+Business_Responsibility_Index_India+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 885125,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Total Waste Recycled, GRI 306-2 (formerly G4-EN23-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_Waste_Recycled_GRI_306_2_formerly_G4_EN23_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Total Waste Recycled, GRI 306-2 (formerly G4-EN23-a)",
      "question": "What is the total amount of waste recycled by the organization (in metric tonnes)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The full set can be downloaded at </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-EN23-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">code</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">306-2 </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><em>Waste by type and disposal method</em></span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Waste_Generated_Recycled_EN23_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"font-size: 1rem; background-color: #ffffff;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water, and ecosystems.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090313\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 306</a> addresses the topic of <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">effluents and waste</span>. This includes water discharges; the generation, treatment and disposal of waste; and spills of chemicals, oils, fuels, and other substances.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The generation, treatment and disposal of waste – including its improper transportation – can pose harm to human health and the environment. This is of particular concern if waste is transported to countries lacking the infrastructure and regulations to handle it.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to effluents and waste, and how it manages these impacts.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question, you need to identify the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">total waste recycled (in tonnes)</span> by the organization <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. <br></span></p>\r\n<p>Start by looking for publicly available documents that may contain this information, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Annual Report (with Non-Financial Data)</li>\r\n<li>ESG Report</li>\r\n<li>Impact Report</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability Report</li>\r\n<li>Climate Disclosure</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\"><strong>Do NOT use the following reports</strong></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Form 10-K</li>\r\n<li>Annual Information Form (if it contains only financial data)</li>\r\n<li>Interim Report</li>\r\n<li>Quarterly Report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> &amp; search terms: <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Waste,</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Recycle, GRI, 306-2, EN23</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">calculations or conversions </span>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report the <em>volume</em> in thousands of cubic metres, or using a unit other than cubic meters. If this is the case, convert units to cubic meters (see website below), or add the number of zeros indicated, and fill in the total number in the answer field - e.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500000'. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://convertunits.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 306 - Waste 2020",
        "GRI Standards+306-4 Waste diverted from disposal",
        "GRI Standards+306-4-b-ii Weight of hazardous waste diverted from disposal by recovery operation: Recycling",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.5 Substantially reduce waste generation through prevention, reduction, recycling, and reuse."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3099,
      "bookmarkers": 12,
      "datasets": 95,
      "companies": 1147,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Environmental_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Percentage_of_waste_recycled.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Higher_School_of_Economics_Research_Group_2020+From_Farm_to_Fork_2020_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_Waste_Recycled_GRI_306_2_formerly_G4_EN23_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 887007,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Sector (Industry)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Sector_Industry.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Sector (Industry)",
      "question": "Which sector does the company operate in?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Automotive",
        "Chemicals",
        "Energy",
        "Food and Beverage Products",
        "Metals Products",
        "Telecommunications",
        "Technology Hardware",
        "Textiles and Apparel",
        "Financial Services"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 2 - General Disclosures",
        "GRI Standards+2-6 Activities, value chain and other business relationships",
        "GRI Standards+2-6-a Sectors of activity"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1053,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1043,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Industry.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Garment_Sector.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Financial_Services_Sector.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Food_Beverages_Sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Sector_Industry+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 887254,
      "name": "Pantelis Ieronimakis+Profit Per Year",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Pantelis_Ieronimakis+Profit_Per_Year.json",
      "designer": "Pantelis Ieronimakis",
      "title": "Profit Per Year",
      "question": "How much profit does a company raise per year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Values",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Pantelis_Ieronimakis+Profit_Per_Year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 893890,
      "name": "Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP)+Non-US effective tax rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Institute_on_Taxation_and_Economic_Policy_ITEP+Non_US_effective_tax_rate.json",
      "designer": "Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP)",
      "title": "Non-US effective tax rate",
      "question": "What was the effective rate of tax paid by the company on earnings outside the United States?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric represents data published by Citizens for Tax Justice - see [[http://www.ctj.org/corporatetaxdodgers/sorrystateofcorptaxes.php|this page]] for more information. Below is taken from the same page:</p>\r\n<p>Profitable corporations are supposed to pay a 35 percent federal income tax rate on their U.S. profits. But many corporations pay far less, or nothing at all, because of the many tax loopholes and special breaks they enjoy. This report documents just how successful many Fortune 500 corporations have been at using these loopholes and special breaks over the past five years.</p>\r\n<p>The report looks at the profits and U.S. federal income taxes of the 288 Fortune 500 companies that have been consistently profitable in each of the five years between 2008 and 2012, excluding companies that experienced even one unprofitable year during this period. Most of these companies were included in our November 2011 report, <em>Corporate Taxpayers and Corporate Tax Dodgers</em>, which looked at the years 2008 through 2010. Our new report is broader, in that it includes companies, such as Facebook, that have entered the Fortune 500 since 2011, and narrower, in that it excludes some companies that were profitable during 2008 to 2010 but lost money in 2011 or 2012.</p>\r\n<p><strong><em>Some Key Findings:</em></strong></p>\r\n<p>• As a group, the 288 corporations examined paid an effective federal income tax rate of just 19.4 percent over the five-year period — far less than the statutory 35 percent tax rate.</p>\r\n<p>• Twenty-six of the corporations, including Boeing, General Electric, Priceline.com and Verizon, paid no federal income tax at all over the five year period. A third of the corporations (93) paid an effective tax rate of less than ten percent over that period.</p>\r\n<p>• Of those corporations in our sample with significant offshore profits, two thirds paid higher corporate tax rates to foreign governments where they operate than they paid in the U.S. on their U.S. profits.</p>\r\n<p>These findings refute the prevailing view inside the Washington, D.C. Beltway that America’s corporate income tax is more burdensome than the corporate income taxes levied by other countries, and that this purported (but false) excess burden somehow makes the U.S. “uncompetitive.”</p>\r\n<p><strong><em>Other Findings:</em></strong></p>\r\n<p>• One hundred and eleven of the 288 companies (39 percent of them) paid zero or less in federal income taxes in at least one year from 2008 to 2012.</p>\r\n<p>• The sectors with the lowest effective corporate tax rates over the five-year period were utilities (2.9 percent), industrial machinery (4.3 percent), telecommunications (9.8 percent), oil, gas and pipelines (14.4 percent), transportation (16.4 percent), aerospace and defense (16.7 percent) and financial (18.8 percent).</p>\r\n<p>• The tax breaks claimed by these companies are highly concentrated in the hands of a few very large corporations. Just 25 companies claimed $174 billion in tax breaks over the five years between 2008 and 2012. That’s almost half the $364 billion in tax subsidies claimed by all of the 288 companies in our sample.</p>\r\n<p>• Five companies — Wells Fargo, AT&amp;T, IBM, General Electric, and Verizon — enjoyed over $77 billion in tax breaks during this five-year period.</p>\r\n<p><strong><em>Recommendations for Reform:</em></strong></p>\r\n<p>• Congress should repeal the rule allowing American multinational corporations to indefinitely “defer” their U.S. taxes on their offshore profits. This reform would effectively remove the tax incentive to shift profits and jobs overseas.</p>\r\n<p>• Limit the ability of tech and other companies to use executive stock options to reduce their taxes by generating phantom “costs” these companies never actually incur.</p>\r\n<p>• Having allowed “bonus depreciation” to expire at the end of 2013, Congress could take the next step and repeal the rest of accelerated depreciation, too.</p>\r\n<p>• Reinstate a strong corporate Alternative Minimum Tax that really does the job it was originally designed to do.</p>\r\n<p>• Require more complete and transparent geography-specific public disclosure of corporate income and tax payments than the Securities and Exchange Commission’s regulations currently mandate.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric expresses the estimated amount of corporation tax tax paid by the company as a percentage of their estimated \"foreign\" (i.e. outside US) profits.</p>\r\n<p>The [[http://www.ctj.org/corporatetaxdodgers/sorrystateofcorptaxes.php#Methodology|Methodology section on this page]] has details of how these estimates were generated.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Avoidance Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 346,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 174,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Institute_on_Taxation_and_Economic_Policy_ITEP+Non_US_effective_tax_rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 900276,
      "name": "Richard Mills+Average Male Remuneration Highest-Paid Category (G4-LA13-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Average_Male_Remuneration_Highest_Paid_Category_G4_LA13_a.json",
      "designer": "Richard Mills",
      "title": "Average Male Remuneration Highest-Paid Category (G4-LA13-a)",
      "question": "What is the average male remuneration (total salary + benefits) for the highest-paid category of employees?\r\n ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/equal-remuneration-for-women-and-men/Pages/G4-LA13.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-LA13</a> – 'Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men by employee category, by significant locations of operation'. This metric asks for the <strong>average male remuneration for the highest</strong><strong>-</strong><strong>paid category of employees</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>Many countries have introduced legislation to enforce the principle of equal pay for work of equal value. This issue is supported by the ILO Convention 100 ‘Equal Remuneration Convention’. Equality of remuneration is a factor in retaining qualified employees in the workforce. Where imbalances exist, an organization runs a risk to its reputation and legal challenges on the basis of discrimination.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To calculate the average male remuneration for the highest-paid category of employees - <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/equal-remuneration-for-women-and-men/Pages/G4-LA13.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-LA13</a>-a:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Identify the total number of male employees in the highest-paid employee category across the organization’s operations, using the information from <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/diversity-and-equal-opportunity/Pages/G4-LA12.aspx\">G4-LA12</a>. Employee categories are defined based on the organization’s own human resources system.</li>\r\n<li>Identify the remuneration for men in the highest-paid employee category. Base remuneration upon the average pay.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 237,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 230,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Average_Male_Remuneration_Highest_Paid_Category_G4_LA13_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 900284,
      "name": "Richard Mills+Average male remuneration for lowest-paid category (G4-LA13-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Average_male_remuneration_for_lowest_paid_category_G4_LA13_a.json",
      "designer": "Richard Mills",
      "title": "Average male remuneration for lowest-paid category (G4-LA13-a)",
      "question": "What is the average male remuneration (total salary + benefits) for the lowest-paid category of employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/equal-remuneration-for-women-and-men/Pages/G4-LA13.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-LA13</a> – 'Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men by employee category, by significant locations of operation'. This metric asks for the <strong>average male remuneration for the lowest</strong><strong>-</strong><strong>paid category of employees</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>Many countries have introduced legislation to enforce the principle of equal pay for work of equal value. This issue is supported by the ILO Convention 100 ‘Equal Remuneration Convention’. Equality of remuneration is a factor in retaining qualified employees in the workforce. Where imbalances exist, an organization runs a risk to its reputation and legal challenges on the basis of discrimination.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To calculate the average male remuneration for the lowest-paid category of employees - <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/equal-remuneration-for-women-and-men/Pages/G4-LA13.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-LA13</a>-a:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Identify the total number of male employees in the lowest-paid employee category across the organization’s operations, using the information from </span><a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/diversity-and-equal-opportunity/Pages/G4-LA12.aspx\">G4-LA12</a><span>. Employee categories are defined based on the organization’s own human resources system.</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Identify the remuneration for men in the lowest-paid employee category. Base remuneration upon the average pay.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 202,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 197,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Average_male_remuneration_for_lowest_paid_category_G4_LA13_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 900299,
      "name": "Richard Mills+Average female remuneration for lowest-paid category (G4-LA13-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Average_female_remuneration_for_lowest_paid_category_G4_LA13_a.json",
      "designer": "Richard Mills",
      "title": "Average female remuneration for lowest-paid category (G4-LA13-a)",
      "question": "What is the average female remuneration (total salary + benefits) for the lowest-paid category of employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/equal-remuneration-for-women-and-men/Pages/G4-LA13.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-LA13</a> – 'Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men by employee category, by significant locations of operation'. This metric asks for the <strong>average female remuneration for the lowest-paid category of employees</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>Many countries have introduced legislation to enforce the principle of equal pay for work of equal value. This issue is supported by the ILO Convention 100 ‘Equal Remuneration Convention’. Equality of remuneration is a factor in retaining qualified employees in the workforce. Where imbalances exist, an organization runs a risk to its reputation and legal challenges on the basis of discrimination.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To calculate the average female remuneration for the lowest-paid category of employees - <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/equal-remuneration-for-women-and-men/Pages/G4-LA13.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-LA13</a>-a:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Identify the total number of female employees in the lowest-paid employee category across the organization’s operations, using the information from </span><a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/diversity-and-equal-opportunity/Pages/G4-LA12.aspx\">G4-LA12</a><span>. Employee categories are defined based on the organization’s own human resources system.</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Identify the remuneration for women in the lowest-paid employee category. Base remuneration upon the average pay.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 202,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 196,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Average_female_remuneration_for_lowest_paid_category_G4_LA13_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 900309,
      "name": "Richard Mills+Average Female Remuneration Highest-Paid Category (G4-LA13-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Average_Female_Remuneration_Highest_Paid_Category_G4_LA13_a.json",
      "designer": "Richard Mills",
      "title": "Average Female Remuneration Highest-Paid Category (G4-LA13-a)",
      "question": "What is the average female remuneration (total salary + benefits) for the highest-paid category of employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/equal-remuneration-for-women-and-men/Pages/G4-LA13.aspx | G4-LA13]] – 'Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men by employee category, by significant locations of operation'. This metric asks for the <strong>average female remuneration for the highest</strong><strong>-</strong><strong>paid category of employees</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>Many countries have introduced legislation to enforce the principle of equal pay for work of equal value. This issue is supported by the ILO Convention 100 ‘Equal Remuneration Convention’. Equality of remuneration is a factor in retaining qualified employees in the workforce. Where imbalances exist, an organization runs a risk to its reputation and legal challenges on the basis of discrimination.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To calculate the average female remuneration for the highest-paid category of employees - <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/equal-remuneration-for-women-and-men/Pages/G4-LA13.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">G4-LA13</a>-a:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Identify the total number of female employees in the highest-paid employee category across the organization’s operations, using the information from <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/labor-practices-and-decent-work/diversity-and-equal-opportunity/Pages/G4-LA12.aspx\">G4-LA12</a>. Employee categories are defined based on the organization’s own human resources system.</li>\r\n<li>Identify the remuneration for women in the highest-paid employee category. Base remuneration upon the average pay.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> <strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 236,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 228,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Average_Female_Remuneration_Highest_Paid_Category_G4_LA13_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 924435,
      "name": "Richard Mills+Renewable energy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Renewable_energy.json",
      "designer": "Richard Mills",
      "title": "Renewable energy",
      "question": "Calculated percentage of all energy that came from renewable sources.",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "m1 / (m1+ m2) * 100",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~836964",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~836952",
          "name": "m"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 277,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 91,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Renewable_energy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 944853,
      "name": "Center for Sustainable Organizations+Maximum Allowable OECD CO2 Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_OECD_CO2_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Center for Sustainable Organizations",
      "title": "Maximum Allowable OECD CO2 Emissions",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 11,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Annual_CO2_Emissions_per_C2GDP_Adjusted_per_OECD_norm.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_OECD_CO2_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 944875,
      "name": "Center for Sustainable Organizations+Maximum Allowable OECD CO2 Emissions - Ratio to Baseline",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_OECD_CO2_Emissions_Ratio_to_Baseline.json",
      "designer": "Center for Sustainable Organizations",
      "title": "Maximum Allowable OECD CO2 Emissions - Ratio to Baseline",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 11,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Annual_CO2_Emissions.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Annual_CO2_Emissions_per_C2GDP.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Annual_CO2_Emissions_per_C2GDP_Adjusted_per_OECD_norm.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_OECD_CO2_Emissions_Ratio_to_Baseline+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 944897,
      "name": "Center for Sustainable Organizations+GDP of OECD",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+GDP_of_OECD.json",
      "designer": "Center for Sustainable Organizations",
      "title": "GDP of OECD",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 11,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Annual_CO2_Emissions_per_C2GDP_Adjusted_per_OECD_norm.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+GDP_of_OECD+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 977868,
      "name": "Richard Mills+Combined Scope 1 and 2 Greenhouse Gas emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Combined_Scope_1_and_2_Greenhouse_Gas_emissions.json",
      "designer": "Richard Mills",
      "title": "Combined Scope 1 and 2 Greenhouse Gas emissions",
      "question": "What were the company's combined Scope 1 and 2 Greenhouse gas emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 + m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~826629"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~826615"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 4895,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1520,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Greenhouse_Gas_emissions_tons_per_employee.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Combined_Scope_1_and_2_Greenhouse_Gas_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 978575,
      "name": "Richard Mills+Greenhouse Gas emissions (tons per employee)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Greenhouse_Gas_emissions_tons_per_employee.json",
      "designer": "Richard Mills",
      "title": "Greenhouse Gas emissions (tons per employee)",
      "question": "This metric divides the company's total (Scope 1 and 2) Greenhouse Gas emissions in a year by the number of employees to produce a \"tons of CO2e per employee\" measure.",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~977868"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~836097"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2845,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 1084,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Greenhouse_Gas_emissions_tons_per_employee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 979906,
      "name": "Richard Mills+Percentage of employees that are temporary",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Percentage_of_employees_that_are_temporary.json",
      "designer": "Richard Mills",
      "title": "Percentage of employees that are temporary",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's employees are temporary (as opposed to permanent)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>A simple sample Formula metric</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Temporary Work",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  temporary / all * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~836163",
          "name": "temporary"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~836097",
          "name": "all"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1859,
      "bookmarkers": 6,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 868,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Percentage_of_employees_that_are_temporary+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 980316,
      "name": "Richard Mills+Number of labour-related GRI disclosures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Number_of_labour_related_GRI_disclosures.json",
      "designer": "Richard Mills",
      "title": "Number of labour-related GRI disclosures",
      "question": "For how many labour-related GRI metrics in this selection did the company disclose the answer?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>I created this metric as an example to show one simple way to analyse a company's GRI report - count the number of metrics where they've disclosed in enough detail to allow us to answer the question.</p>\r\n<p><strong>The maximum score a company can achieve on this metric right now is 15.</strong></p>\r\n<p>There's an issue with handling of \"Unknowns\" that limits the metrics this can accurately be applied to for now - once this is addressed I will add additional metrics.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Temporary Work",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Termination & Dismissal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, m8, m9, m10, m11, m12, m13, m14, m15]);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~815103",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~836163",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~836128",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~837376",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~837335",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~837320",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~837273",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m8",
          "metric": "~836932",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m9",
          "metric": "~836911",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m10",
          "metric": "~836097",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m11",
          "metric": "~837487",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m12",
          "metric": "~837241",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m13",
          "metric": "~837254",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m14",
          "metric": "~813606",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m15",
          "metric": "~837454",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 6310,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2274,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Number_of_labour_related_GRI_disclosures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 980818,
      "name": "CDP+Performance Score+Richard Mills",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/CDP+Performance_Score+Richard_Mills.json",
      "designer": "CDP",
      "title": "Performance Score",
      "question": "Maps performance score on to 0-10 scale",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"A\":\"10\",\"A-\":\"9\",\"B\":\"7\",\"C\":\"5\",\"D\":\"3\",\"E\":\"1\",\"Unknown\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 278,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 270,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Example_Rating_CDP_scores.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/CDP+Performance_Score+Richard_Mills+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 981936,
      "name": "CDP+Disclosure Score+Richard Mills",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/CDP+Disclosure_Score+Richard_Mills.json",
      "designer": "CDP",
      "title": "Disclosure Score",
      "question": "Maps Disclosure Score on to 0-10 scale",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 283,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 277,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Example_Rating_CDP_scores.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/CDP+Disclosure_Score+Richard_Mills+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 983047,
      "name": "Richard Mills+Example Rating - CDP scores",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Example_Rating_CDP_scores.json",
      "designer": "Richard Mills",
      "title": "Example Rating - CDP scores",
      "question": "Example Rating using two CDP scores",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This is the first Rating on wikirate.org and it's designed as a simple example to show how the system works. It combines two CDP scores, giving more weight to performance than disclosure.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~981936",
          "weight": "30"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~980818",
          "weight": "70"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 274,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 268,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Example_Rating_CDP_scores+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 984301,
      "name": "Center for Sustainable Organizations+Value-added Contributions to GDP (C2GDP)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Value_added_Contributions_to_GDP_C2GDP.json",
      "designer": "Center for Sustainable Organizations",
      "title": "Value-added Contributions to GDP (C2GDP)",
      "question": "What's the Company's Total Value-Added Contributions to GDP (Gross Margins/Profits)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Annual_CO2_Emissions_per_C2GDP.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Annual_CO2_Emissions_per_C2GDP_Adjusted_per_OECD_norm.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Annual_CO2_Emission_Targets.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Annual_CO2_Emissions_Context_Based_Relative_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Value_added_Contributions_to_GDP_C2GDP+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 984305,
      "name": "Center for Sustainable Organizations+Annual CO2 Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Annual_CO2_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Center for Sustainable Organizations",
      "title": "Annual CO2 Emissions",
      "question": "What's the Company's total CO2 Emissions (tCO2)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 17,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+CO2_Emissions_Relative_to_Gross_Revenue.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Cumulative_CO2_Emissions.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Annual_CO2_Emissions.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Annual_CO2_Emissions_per_C2GDP.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Annual_CO2_Emissions_Context_Based_Relative_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Annual_CO2_Emissions_Context_Based_Absolute_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Annual_CO2_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 984309,
      "name": "Center for Sustainable Organizations+Gross Revenue",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Gross_Revenue.json",
      "designer": "Center for Sustainable Organizations",
      "title": "Gross Revenue",
      "question": "What's the compnay's gross revenue?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+CO2_Emissions_Relative_to_Gross_Revenue.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Gross_Revenue+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 984313,
      "name": "Center for Sustainable Organizations+CO2 Emissions Relative to Gross Revenue",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+CO2_Emissions_Relative_to_Gross_Revenue.json",
      "designer": "Center for Sustainable Organizations",
      "title": "CO2 Emissions Relative to Gross Revenue",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~984305"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~984309"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 8,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+CO2_Emissions_Relative_to_Gross_Revenue+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 984317,
      "name": "Center for Sustainable Organizations+Cumulative CO2 Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Cumulative_CO2_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Center for Sustainable Organizations",
      "title": "Cumulative CO2 Emissions",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1.reduce((function(a, b) {\n    return a + b;\n  }), 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~984305",
          "year": "2006..0"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Cumulative_CO2_Emissions_Context_Free_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Cumulative_CO2_Emissions_Context_Based_Absolute_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Cumulative_CO2_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 984321,
      "name": "Center for Sustainable Organizations+Maximum Allowable Annual CO2 Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Annual_CO2_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Center for Sustainable Organizations",
      "title": "Maximum Allowable Annual CO2 Emissions",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 * m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~984305",
          "year": "2005"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~944875",
          "company": "Center for Sustainable Organizations"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 11,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Cumulative_CO2_Emissions.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Annual_CO2_Emissions_per_C2GDP_Adjusted_per_OECD_norm.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Annual_CO2_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 984325,
      "name": "Center for Sustainable Organizations+Maximum Allowable Cumulative CO2 Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Cumulative_CO2_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Center for Sustainable Organizations",
      "title": "Maximum Allowable Cumulative CO2 Emissions",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1.reduce((function(a, b) {\n    return a + b;\n  }), 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~984321",
          "year": "2006..0"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Cumulative_CO2_Emissions_Context_Free_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Cumulative_CO2_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 984329,
      "name": "Center for Sustainable Organizations+Maximum Allowable Annual CO2 Emissions per C2GDP",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Annual_CO2_Emissions_per_C2GDP.json",
      "designer": "Center for Sustainable Organizations",
      "title": "Maximum Allowable Annual CO2 Emissions per C2GDP",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 * m2 / m3;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~984305",
          "year": "2005"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~944875",
          "company": "Center for Sustainable Organizations"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~984301",
          "year": "2005"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 11,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Annual_CO2_Emissions_per_C2GDP_Adjusted_per_OECD_norm.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Annual_CO2_Emissions_per_C2GDP+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 984333,
      "name": "Center for Sustainable Organizations+Maximum Allowable Annual CO2 Emissions per C2GDP - Adjusted per OECD norm",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Annual_CO2_Emissions_per_C2GDP_Adjusted_per_OECD_norm.json",
      "designer": "Center for Sustainable Organizations",
      "title": "Maximum Allowable Annual CO2 Emissions per C2GDP - Adjusted per OECD norm",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  (m1 * Math.pow(10, 9)) / ((m2 * Math.pow(10, 9) - m3) / (m4 - m5) * (m6 - m7) * m8 + m9 * m10) * m11;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~944853",
          "company": "Center for Sustainable Organizations"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~944853",
          "year": "2005",
          "company": "Center for Sustainable Organizations"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~984321",
          "year": "2005"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~944897",
          "year": "2005",
          "company": "Center for Sustainable Organizations"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~984301",
          "year": "2005"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~944897",
          "company": "Center for Sustainable Organizations"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~984301"
        },
        {
          "name": "m8",
          "metric": "~944875",
          "company": "Center for Sustainable Organizations"
        },
        {
          "name": "m9",
          "metric": "~984329"
        },
        {
          "name": "m10",
          "metric": "~984301"
        },
        {
          "name": "m11",
          "metric": "~984329"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 8,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Annual_CO2_Emission_Targets.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Annual_CO2_Emissions_Context_Based_Relative_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Maximum_Allowable_Annual_CO2_Emissions_per_C2GDP_Adjusted_per_OECD_norm+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 984337,
      "name": "Center for Sustainable Organizations+Annual CO2 Emission Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Annual_CO2_Emission_Targets.json",
      "designer": "Center for Sustainable Organizations",
      "title": "Annual CO2 Emission Targets",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 * m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~984333"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~984301"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 8,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Cumulative_CO2_Emission_Targets.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Annual_CO2_Emissions_Context_Based_Absolute_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Annual_CO2_Emission_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 984341,
      "name": "Center for Sustainable Organizations+Cumulative CO2 Emission Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Cumulative_CO2_Emission_Targets.json",
      "designer": "Center for Sustainable Organizations",
      "title": "Cumulative CO2 Emission Targets",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1.reduce((function(a, b) {\n    return a + b;\n  }), 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~984337",
          "year": "2006..0"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Cumulative_CO2_Emissions_Context_Based_Absolute_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Cumulative_CO2_Emission_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 984345,
      "name": "Center for Sustainable Organizations+Cumulative CO2 Emissions Context-Free Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Cumulative_CO2_Emissions_Context_Free_Score.json",
      "designer": "Center for Sustainable Organizations",
      "title": "Cumulative CO2 Emissions Context-Free Score",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~984317"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~984325"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Cumulative_CO2_Emissions_Context_Free_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 984349,
      "name": "Center for Sustainable Organizations+Annual CO2 Emissions Context-Based Relative Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Annual_CO2_Emissions_Context_Based_Relative_Score.json",
      "designer": "Center for Sustainable Organizations",
      "title": "Annual CO2 Emissions Context-Based Relative Score",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2 / m3;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~984305"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~984301"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~984333"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 8,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Annual_CO2_Emissions_Context_Based_Relative_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 984353,
      "name": "Center for Sustainable Organizations+Annual CO2 Emissions Context-Based Absolute Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Annual_CO2_Emissions_Context_Based_Absolute_Score.json",
      "designer": "Center for Sustainable Organizations",
      "title": "Annual CO2 Emissions Context-Based Absolute Score",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~984305"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~984337"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 8,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Annual_CO2_Emissions_Context_Based_Absolute_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 984357,
      "name": "Center for Sustainable Organizations+Cumulative CO2 Emissions Context-Based Absolute Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Cumulative_CO2_Emissions_Context_Based_Absolute_Score.json",
      "designer": "Center for Sustainable Organizations",
      "title": "Cumulative CO2 Emissions Context-Based Absolute Score",
      "question": "Were the company's CO2 emissions within their \"allowance\" of global emissions (as determined by their value-added contribution to GDP)? The values for this metric are cumulative (i.e. reflect every year since 2005)",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the [[http://www.sustainableorganizations.org/context-based-metrics-in-public-domain.html | Centre for Sustainable Organizations]] context-based carbon metric. It is still considered to be a work in progress.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~984317"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~984341"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Sustainable_Organizations+Cumulative_CO2_Emissions_Context_Based_Absolute_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1173487,
      "name": "Elske Krikhaar+Detox Leader",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Elske_Krikhaar+Detox_Leader.json",
      "designer": "Elske Krikhaar",
      "title": "Detox Leader",
      "question": "Is the company part of the Detox Catwalk leaders group? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Detox Leaders</strong><span> - Detox committed companies leading the industry towards a toxic-free future with credible timelines, concrete actions and on-the-ground implementation.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Detox Leaders</strong><span> - Detox committed companies leading the industry towards a toxic-free future with credible timelines, concrete actions and on-the-ground implementation.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Detox Catwalk 2015: Fashion Brands' Efforts to Eliminate Hazardous Chemicals",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 17,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 16,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Elske_Krikhaar+Detox_Leader+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1173494,
      "name": "Elske Krikhaar+Detox Greenwasher",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Elske_Krikhaar+Detox_Greenwasher.json",
      "designer": "Elske Krikhaar",
      "title": "Detox Greenwasher",
      "question": "Is this company part of the Detox Greenwashers group? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Greenwashers</strong><span> – Detox committed companies that are so far failing to walk the talk and take individual corporate responsibility for their hazardous chemical pollution</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Greenwashers</strong><span> – Detox committed companies that are so far failing to walk the talk and take individual corporate responsibility for their hazardous chemical pollution</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Detox Catwalk 2015: Fashion Brands' Efforts to Eliminate Hazardous Chemicals",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Elske_Krikhaar+Detox_Greenwasher+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1175393,
      "name": "Laureen van Breen+Animal Welfare Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laureen_van_Breen+Animal_Welfare_Policy.json",
      "designer": "Laureen van Breen",
      "title": "Animal Welfare Policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy in place that addresses animal welfare?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The first step for organizations toward reputable animal welfare practices is establishing an intended way of handling the animals that are part of their business acitivities. Ideally such a policy includes a systems that enables the organization to monitor and control these processes. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Using search terms like \"animal welfare\" or \"animal wellbeing\" go through the company's CSR report and establish whether a policy has been put into place that addresses animal welfare practices.</p>\r\n<p>Specify in a comment to the metric value whether this policy is applicable to internal and/or external (for instance in their supply chain) activities. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laureen_van_Breen+Animal_Welfare_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1175416,
      "name": "Laureen van Breen+Antibiotics Ratio",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laureen_van_Breen+Antibiotics_Ratio.json",
      "designer": "Laureen van Breen",
      "title": "Antibiotics Ratio",
      "question": "What is the average number of daily doses of antibiotics per animal on an annual basis?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Part of keeping cattle is keeping the herd healthy. Animal medication can be part of this pursuit. Antibiotics are however a contested substance as it is often added to the animal feed as a preventative measure. This over-use of the substance can have many negative health impacts for both the animals as well as the consumer community. Keeping track of the use of antibiotics in the supply chain of companies as such adds to the transparency of their efforts to ensure the health and safety of both their animals and their customers.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Using search terms like \"antibiotics\", \"animal medicine\" or \"medication\" go through the company's CSR report and establish whether the use of anitbiotics is reported on.</p>\r\n<p>If the ratio is not reported are required by this metric, try to find data that will allow you to calculate the ratio yourself (e.g. total number of animals, number of daily doses used annually, etc.). If you are able to calculate the ratio, please provide your calculations in a comment to the metric value.</p>\r\n<p>If no specific data is reported, provide in a comment to the metric value whether animal medication is reported on at all and possibly which particular kinds of medicine are reported on. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": ": 1",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laureen_van_Breen+Antibiotics_Ratio+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1175450,
      "name": "Laureen van Breen+Space per Animal",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laureen_van_Breen+Space_per_Animal.json",
      "designer": "Laureen van Breen",
      "title": "Space per Animal",
      "question": "What has company set as its minimum space (m2) requirement per animal?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>One of the components directed at causing no unneccesary harm to animals is ensuring that they have adequate space to express normal behavior. By reporting the minimum required square meters of space per animal companies give insight into the living conditions of the animals that are part of business activities. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>Using search terms like \"space per animal\", \"area per animal\" or \"animal living conditions\" go through the company's CSR report and establish what the company has set as the minimum space requirement per animal.</span></p>\r\n<p>In a comment to the metric value specify which kind of animal (pig, cow, chicken, rabit, etc.) this value corresponds to.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laureen_van_Breen+Space_per_Animal+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1175464,
      "name": "Laureen van Breen+Animal Feed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laureen_van_Breen+Animal_Feed.json",
      "designer": "Laureen van Breen",
      "title": "Animal Feed",
      "question": "What is the percentage of the animal feed usage?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The animal feed can affect a lot of different social and environmental factors. It contributes to the safety and quality of food products, the productivity and welfare of the animals, and the conservation (or disruption) of the environment. As such it is widely relevant to a company's reporting transparency.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Using search terms like \"animal feed\" or \"animal food\" go through the company's CSR report and establish what the main component of the animal feed is.</p>\r\n<p>If a more detailed composition of feed is reported on, please add this information as a comment to the metric value.</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laureen_van_Breen+Animal_Feed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1181153,
      "name": "UN Global Compact+CEO Water Mandate Endorsing Companies",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/UN_Global_Compact+CEO_Water_Mandate_Endorsing_Companies.json",
      "designer": "UN Global Compact",
      "title": "CEO Water Mandate Endorsing Companies",
      "question": "Does the organization endorse the CEO Water Mandate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The CEO Water Mandate is an international movement of companies <span>committed</span><span> </span><span>to water stewardship. </span>A company that joins the initiative indicates their endorsement of the CEO Water Mandate and its six elements – Direct Operations, Supply Chain and Watershed Management, Collective Action, Public Policy, Community Engagement, Transparency — is a UN Global Compact signatory, and reports annually on its progress in implementing the Mandate’s six elements.</p>\r\n<p>Companies have a great deal of flexibility in the format and approach taken in their annual reports. Though use of the [[http://ceowatermandate.org/disclosure/|Corporate Water Disclosure Guidelines]] is recommended, companies need only report against the Mandate’s six elements as they deem appropriate.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Find the list of companies endorsing the CEO Water Mandate on the initiative's website: http://ceowatermandate.org/join-us/endorsing-companies/</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 149,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 147,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/UN_Global_Compact+CEO_Water_Mandate_Endorsing_Companies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1182168,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Environmental Screening of New suppliers, GRI 308-1 (formerly G4-EN32)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Screening_of_New_suppliers_GRI_308_1_formerly_G4_EN32.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Environmental Screening of New suppliers, GRI 308-1 (formerly G4-EN32)",
      "question": "What percentage of new suppliers were screened using environmental criteria?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines.</p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water and ecosystems. [[https://wikirate.org/Source_000090315|GRI 308]] addresses the topic of supplier environmental assessment.</p>\r\n<p>An organization might be involved with impacts either through its own activities or as a result of its business relationships with other parties.</p>\r\n<p>Due diligence is expected of an organization in order to prevent andmitigate negative environmental impacts in the supply chain. These include impacts the organization either causes or contributes to, or that are directly linked to its activities, products, or services by its relationship with a supplier.</p>\r\n<p><strong>This disclosure informs stakeholders about the percentage of suppliers selected or contracted subject due diligence processes for environmental impacts.</strong></p>\r\n<p>An organization is expected to initiate due diligence as early as possible in the development of a new relationship with a supplier. Impacts may be prevented or mitigated at the stage of structuring contracts or other agreements, as well as via ongoing collaboration with suppliers.</p>\r\n<hr>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">*In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-EN32 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 308-1 code is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found [[https://wikirate.org/Environmental%20Screening%20of%20New%20Suppliers%20(G4-EN32)%20Methodology|here]].</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify <strong>the percentage of new suppliers were screened using environmental criteria for a specific year. </strong></p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.</p>\r\n<p>Keywords and search terms for this metric:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>GRI</li>\r\n<li>308 </li>\r\n<li>GRI Index</li>\r\n<li>Environmental Screeing</li>\r\n<li>New Suppliers</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>To calculate the percentage of new suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Identify the total number of new suppliers that the organization considered selecting or contracting with.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Identify the total number of new suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>Units </strong></p>\r\n<p>Companies may report this information in absolute numbers. Make sure you check the unit of measurement (%).</p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Select the '<span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\">Unknown</span>' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "1-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Global Reporting Initiative+Environmental Screening of New suppliers, GRI 308-1 (formerly G4-EN32)+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 624,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 35,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Screening_of_New_suppliers_GRI_308_1_formerly_G4_EN32+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Screening_of_New_suppliers_GRI_308_1_formerly_G4_EN32+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1185197,
      "name": "Hala @WR+World Bank Debarred Firms",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Hala_WR+World_Bank_Debarred_Firms.json",
      "designer": "Hala @WR",
      "title": "World Bank Debarred Firms",
      "question": "Is the compnay listed under the most recent World Bank listing of ineligible firms &amp; individuals?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The World Bank publishes and maintains a list of [[http://bit.ly/1dpgAgX| sanctioned]]  companies and individuals under the Bank's fraud and corruption policy. Such sanction was imposed as the result of: </p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>an administrative process conducted by the Bank that permitted the accused firms and individuals to respond to the allegations, or</li>\r\n<li>cross-debarment in accordance with the Agreement for Mutual Enforcement of Debarment Decisions dated 9 April 2010, which, as of July 1, 2011, has been made effective by the World Bank, Asian Development Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Inter-American Development Bank, and African Development Bank.</li>\r\n</ol>",
      "methodology": "<p>To check whether the company you wish to research is debarred by the World Bank, consult the bank's list of [[http://bit.ly/1dpgAgX| sanctioned]] companies and individuals. This page contains a filter engine where you can search their database by company name or by country. If the company you searched for has been sanctioned, check the [[http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPROCUREMENT/Resources/Procurement_GLs_English_Final_Jan2011_revised_July1-2014.pdf| reason]] behind the bank's santions' committee decision and add it in the comments box.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Other",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Hala_WR+World_Bank_Debarred_Firms+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1368135,
      "name": "Electronic Frontier Foundation+Follows industry-accepted best practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Follows_industry_accepted_best_practices.json",
      "designer": "Electronic Frontier Foundation",
      "title": "Follows industry-accepted best practices",
      "question": "Does the company follow industry-accepted best practices?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>These standards were developed over the course of four years of EFF (<a href=\"https://www.eff.org\">Electronic Frontier Foundation</a>) reports, and they encompass three of the main issues at the heart of Who Has Your Back: requiring a warrant before handing over user content, publishing regular transparency reports, and publishing law enforcement guides. The transparency reports and the law enforcement guides help users understand how often and under what circumstances the companies are responding to government data requests, while the warrant for content ensures a strong legal requirement be met before data is handed to law enforcement.</p>\r\n<p>In 2011, no company received credit in all of these categories (or even in two of those categories, since in 2011 we didn’t include a category for requiring warrants for content). In 2015, 23 of the 24 companies in our report have adopted these principles. It’s clear that these best practices truly are accepted by the technology industry. WhatsApp is notably lagging behind. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We live digital lives—from the videos shared on social networks, to location-aware apps on mobile phones, to log-in data for connecting to our email, to our stored documents, to our search history. The personal, the profound, and even the absurd are all transcribed into data packets, whizzing through the fiber-optic arteries of the network.</p>\r\n<p>While our daily lives have upgraded to the 21st century, the law hasn’t kept pace. To date, the U.S. Congress hasn’t managed to update the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act to acknowledge that email stored more than 6 months deserves identical protections to email stored less than 6 months. Congress also dragged its feet on halting the NSA’s indiscriminate surveillance of online communications and has yet to enact the strong reforms we deserve. Congress is even on the precipice of making things far worse, considering proposals that would mandate government backdoors into the technology we rely on to digitally communicate.</p>\r\n<p>In this climate, we increasingly look to technology companies themselves to have the strongest possible policies when it comes to protecting user rights. Which companies will stand by users, insisting on transparency and strong legal standards around government access to user data? And which companies make those policies public, letting the world—and their own users—judge their stances on standing up for privacy rights?</p>\r\n<p>For four years, the Electronic Frontier Foundation documented the practices of major Internet companies and service providers, judging their publicly available policies, and highlighting best practices. Over the course of those first four reports, we watched a transformation take place among the practices of major technology companies. Overwhelmingly, tech giants began publishing annual reports about government data requests, promising to provide users notice when the government sought access to their data, and requiring a search warrant before handing over user content. Those best practices we identified in early reports became industry standards in a few short years, and we’re proud of the role our annual report played in pushing companies to institute these changes.</p>\r\n<p>But times have changed, and now users expect more.</p>\r\n<p>The criteria we used to judge companies in 2011 were ambitious for the time, but they’ve been almost universally adopted in the years since then. Now, users should expect companies to far exceed the standards articulated in the original <em>Who Has Your Back</em> report. Users should look to companies like Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon to be transparent about the types of content that is blocked or censored in response to government requests, as well as what deleted data is kept around in case government agents seek it in the future. We also look to these companies to take a principled stance against government-mandated backdoors.</p>\r\n<p>In this, our fifth annual <em>Who Has Your Back</em> report, we took the main principles of the prior reports and rolled them into a single category: Industry-Accepted Best Practices. We’ve also refined our expectations around providing users notice and added new categories to highlight other important transparency and user rights issues.</p>\r\n<p>We think it’s time to expect more from Silicon Valley. We designed this report to take the basic principles of <em>Who Has Your Back</em> up a notch and see which companies were still leading the pack. Already, our newest report has had a similar effect on the industry as a whole, encouraging companies large and small to strive for more when it comes to standing by their users. In the months since we first told the companies what this year’s criteria would be, we’ve seen significant improvement in company practices. And we hope—and expect—that over the next year, we’ll see even more.</p>\r\n<p>Download the complete <em>Who Has Your Back? 2015: Protecting Your Data From Government Requests</em> report <a href=\"https://www.eff.org/files/2015/06/18/who_has_your_back_2015_protecting_your_data_from_government_requests_20150618.pdf\">as a PDF</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "steps in the right direction"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 26,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 25,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Follows_industry_accepted_best_practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1368411,
      "name": "Electronic Frontier Foundation+Tells users about government data demands",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Tells_users_about_government_data_demands.json",
      "designer": "Electronic Frontier Foundation",
      "title": "Tells users about government data demands",
      "question": "Does the company tell users about government data demands?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2015, <a href=\"https://www.eff.org\">Electronic Frontier Foundation</a> asked companies to do more than simply promise to inform users about government data requests. They also asked them to provide advance notice to users before handing the data to the government. In cases when companies are prohibited from doing so, they asked the companies to promise to provide notice after an emergency has ended or a gag was lifted. Because they knew it would take significant engineering and workflow changes for some of the larger companies to implement these practices, they gave them more than a year’s notice that this criterion would be included in the 2015 report. Two companies who had previously earned credit in our report for telling users about government data requests did not receive credit this year because they did not have policies that tell users after a gag has been lifted or an emergency ended: Google and Twitter.</p>",
      "methodology": "<div>\r\n<p>We live digital lives—from the videos shared on social networks, to location-aware apps on mobile phones, to log-in data for connecting to our email, to our stored documents, to our search history. The personal, the profound, and even the absurd are all transcribed into data packets, whizzing through the fiber-optic arteries of the network.</p>\r\n<p>While our daily lives have upgraded to the 21st century, the law hasn’t kept pace. To date, the U.S. Congress hasn’t managed to update the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act to acknowledge that email stored more than 6 months deserves identical protections to email stored less than 6 months. Congress also dragged its feet on halting the NSA’s indiscriminate surveillance of online communications and has yet to enact the strong reforms we deserve. Congress is even on the precipice of making things far worse, considering proposals that would mandate government backdoors into the technology we rely on to digitally communicate.</p>\r\n<p>In this climate, we increasingly look to technology companies themselves to have the strongest possible policies when it comes to protecting user rights. Which companies will stand by users, insisting on transparency and strong legal standards around government access to user data? And which companies make those policies public, letting the world—and their own users—judge their stances on standing up for privacy rights?</p>\r\n<p>For four years, the Electronic Frontier Foundation documented the practices of major Internet companies and service providers, judging their publicly available policies, and highlighting best practices. Over the course of those first four reports, we watched a transformation take place among the practices of major technology companies. Overwhelmingly, tech giants began publishing annual reports about government data requests, promising to provide users notice when the government sought access to their data, and requiring a search warrant before handing over user content. Those best practices we identified in early reports became industry standards in a few short years, and we’re proud of the role our annual report played in pushing companies to institute these changes.</p>\r\n<p>But times have changed, and now users expect more.</p>\r\n<p>The criteria we used to judge companies in 2011 were ambitious for the time, but they’ve been almost universally adopted in the years since then. Now, users should expect companies to far exceed the standards articulated in the original <em>Who Has Your Back</em> report. Users should look to companies like Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon to be transparent about the types of content that is blocked or censored in response to government requests, as well as what deleted data is kept around in case government agents seek it in the future. We also look to these companies to take a principled stance against government-mandated backdoors.</p>\r\n<p>In this, our fifth annual <em>Who Has Your Back</em> report, we took the main principles of the prior reports and rolled them into a single category: Industry-Accepted Best Practices. We’ve also refined our expectations around providing users notice and added new categories to highlight other important transparency and user rights issues.</p>\r\n<p>We think it’s time to expect more from Silicon Valley. We designed this report to take the basic principles of <em>Who Has Your Back</em> up a notch and see which companies were still leading the pack. Already, our newest report has had a similar effect on the industry as a whole, encouraging companies large and small to strive for more when it comes to standing by their users. In the months since we first told the companies what this year’s criteria would be, we’ve seen significant improvement in company practices. And we hope—and expect—that over the next year, we’ll see even more.</p>\r\n<p>Download the complete <em>Who Has Your Back? 2015: Protecting Your Data From Government Requests</em> report <a href=\"https://www.eff.org/files/2015/06/18/who_has_your_back_2015_protecting_your_data_from_government_requests_20150618.pdf\">as a PDF</a>.</p>\r\n</div>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "steps in the right direction"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 70,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 31,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Tells_users_about_government_data_demands+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1368583,
      "name": "Electronic Frontier Foundation+Discloses policies on data retention",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Discloses_policies_on_data_retention.json",
      "designer": "Electronic Frontier Foundation",
      "title": "Discloses policies on data retention",
      "question": "Does the company disclose policies on data retention?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2015, <a href=\"https://www.eff.org\">Electronic Frontier Foundation</a> evaluated companies on whether they were transparent about what deleted data they stored. Often, users may not realize that data they delete from an email service provider or off a social network is still stored and available to law enforcement agencies upon request. Transparency is the first step to educating users about what happens to their deleted data, so we are evaluating companies on their transparency practices in this category. Note that EFF aren’t making specific requirements about a company deleting data after a certain time. Indeed, some companies publicly state that they maintain deleted data and server logs indefinitely—a practice we think is terrible for users. However, for this report, they’re just asking companies to be clear about retention periods for data collected that may not be easily viewable to the user (including IP addresses and DHCP data) as well as content that users deleted.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We live digital lives—from the videos shared on social networks, to location-aware apps on mobile phones, to log-in data for connecting to our email, to our stored documents, to our search history. The personal, the profound, and even the absurd are all transcribed into data packets, whizzing through the fiber-optic arteries of the network.</p>\r\n<p>While our daily lives have upgraded to the 21st century, the law hasn’t kept pace. To date, the U.S. Congress hasn’t managed to update the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act to acknowledge that email stored more than 6 months deserves identical protections to email stored less than 6 months. Congress also dragged its feet on halting the NSA’s indiscriminate surveillance of online communications and has yet to enact the strong reforms we deserve. Congress is even on the precipice of making things far worse, considering proposals that would mandate government backdoors into the technology we rely on to digitally communicate.</p>\r\n<p>In this climate, we increasingly look to technology companies themselves to have the strongest possible policies when it comes to protecting user rights. Which companies will stand by users, insisting on transparency and strong legal standards around government access to user data? And which companies make those policies public, letting the world—and their own users—judge their stances on standing up for privacy rights?</p>\r\n<p>For four years, the Electronic Frontier Foundation documented the practices of major Internet companies and service providers, judging their publicly available policies, and highlighting best practices. Over the course of those first four reports, we watched a transformation take place among the practices of major technology companies. Overwhelmingly, tech giants began publishing annual reports about government data requests, promising to provide users notice when the government sought access to their data, and requiring a search warrant before handing over user content. Those best practices we identified in early reports became industry standards in a few short years, and we’re proud of the role our annual report played in pushing companies to institute these changes.</p>\r\n<p>But times have changed, and now users expect more.</p>\r\n<p>The criteria we used to judge companies in 2011 were ambitious for the time, but they’ve been almost universally adopted in the years since then. Now, users should expect companies to far exceed the standards articulated in the original <em>Who Has Your Back</em> report. Users should look to companies like Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon to be transparent about the types of content that is blocked or censored in response to government requests, as well as what deleted data is kept around in case government agents seek it in the future. We also look to these companies to take a principled stance against government-mandated backdoors.</p>\r\n<p>In this, our fifth annual <em>Who Has Your Back</em> report, we took the main principles of the prior reports and rolled them into a single category: Industry-Accepted Best Practices. We’ve also refined our expectations around providing users notice and added new categories to highlight other important transparency and user rights issues.</p>\r\n<p>We think it’s time to expect more from Silicon Valley. We designed this report to take the basic principles of <em>Who Has Your Back</em> up a notch and see which companies were still leading the pack. Already, our newest report has had a similar effect on the industry as a whole, encouraging companies large and small to strive for more when it comes to standing by their users. In the months since we first told the companies what this year’s criteria would be, we’ve seen significant improvement in company practices. And we hope—and expect—that over the next year, we’ll see even more.</p>\r\n<p>Download the complete <em>Who Has Your Back? 2015: Protecting Your Data From Government Requests</em> report <a href=\"https://www.eff.org/files/2015/06/18/who_has_your_back_2015_protecting_your_data_from_government_requests_20150618.pdf\">as a PDF</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "steps in the right direction"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Cybersecurity Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Discloses_policies_on_data_retention+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1368621,
      "name": "Electronic Frontier Foundation+Transparent About Legal Takedown Requests",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Transparent_About_Legal_Takedown_Requests.json",
      "designer": "Electronic Frontier Foundation",
      "title": "Transparent About Legal Takedown Requests",
      "question": "Does the company disclose government content removal requests?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The </span><a href=\"https://www.eff.org\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Electronic Frontier Foundation</a><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> </span>examines major tech companies’ content moderation policies in the midst of massive government pressure to censor, assessing companies annually in their <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\"Who Has Your Back\" report.</span></p>\r\n<p>This metric focuses on the company's Transparency About Legal Takedown Requests. To earn a star (Yes) in this category, the service provider must regularly publish records of government requests for takedowns based on claims of legal violations, for instance, in its transparency report. This should include, at a minimum, the information necessary to determine:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>the number of requests received,</li>\r\n<li>the country from which the request originated,</li>\r\n<li>the number of requests acted upon and/or the number of posts removed or restricted or accounts suspended, and</li>\r\n<li>for service providers reporting on multiple products/platforms, the product/platform associated with the requested content or account.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Takedown requests include requests to restrict public access to a post, including geographic limitation, and account suspensions that limit access to posts for a period of time.</p>\r\n<p>Reporting must distinguish legal takedown requests from platform policy takedown requests.</p>\r\n<p>A request is categorized as a “government request” if it is provided through official channels (such as an order issued by a competent judicial authority); if the requestor identifies themselves as a government official or relies upon their governmental position or authority; or if the provider otherwise is aware a government is being represented in the request.</p>\r\n<p>If the service provider is restricted by applicable law from disclosing the request, it may delay including the request until that restriction is lifted and still get credit in this category.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>See EFF's most recent reports to find answers to this question:</p>\r\n<p><em style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"https://www.eff.org/files/2019/06/11/whyb_2019_report.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Who Has Your Back? 2019</a></em></p>\r\n<p><em><a href=\"https://www.eff.org/files/2018/05/31/whyb_2018_report.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Who Has Your Back? 2018</a></em></p>\r\n<p>Star translations to metric categories: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Full star = Yes</li>\r\n<li>No star = No</li>\r\n<li>Half star = Steps in the right direction</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Steps in the right direction"
      ],
      "report_type": "Research Document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 23,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Transparent_About_Legal_Takedown_Requests+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1368744,
      "name": "Electronic Frontier Foundation+Pro-User Public Policy: Opposing Backdoors",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Pro_User_Public_Policy_Opposing_Backdoors.json",
      "designer": "Electronic Frontier Foundation",
      "title": "Pro-User Public Policy: Opposing Backdoors",
      "question": "Has the company taken a public position opposing back-doors?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>One of the big trends <a href=\"https://www.eff.org\">Electronic Frontier Foundation</a> is seeing across the tech industry is a rejection of government-mandated security weaknesses. In fact, 21 of the 24 companies they evaluated took a public position opposing backdoors. This is a powerful statement from the technology community that Congress and the White House should heed.</p>",
      "methodology": "<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p>We live digital lives—from the videos shared on social networks, to location-aware apps on mobile phones, to log-in data for connecting to our email, to our stored documents, to our search history. The personal, the profound, and even the absurd are all transcribed into data packets, whizzing through the fiber-optic arteries of the network.</p>\r\n<p>While our daily lives have upgraded to the 21st century, the law hasn’t kept pace. To date, the U.S. Congress hasn’t managed to update the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act to acknowledge that email stored more than 6 months deserves identical protections to email stored less than 6 months. Congress also dragged its feet on halting the NSA’s indiscriminate surveillance of online communications and has yet to enact the strong reforms we deserve. Congress is even on the precipice of making things far worse, considering proposals that would mandate government backdoors into the technology we rely on to digitally communicate.</p>\r\n<p>In this climate, we increasingly look to technology companies themselves to have the strongest possible policies when it comes to protecting user rights. Which companies will stand by users, insisting on transparency and strong legal standards around government access to user data? And which companies make those policies public, letting the world—and their own users—judge their stances on standing up for privacy rights?</p>\r\n<p>For four years, the Electronic Frontier Foundation documented the practices of major Internet companies and service providers, judging their publicly available policies, and highlighting best practices. Over the course of those first four reports, we watched a transformation take place among the practices of major technology companies. Overwhelmingly, tech giants began publishing annual reports about government data requests, promising to provide users notice when the government sought access to their data, and requiring a search warrant before handing over user content. Those best practices we identified in early reports became industry standards in a few short years, and we’re proud of the role our annual report played in pushing companies to institute these changes.</p>\r\n<p>But times have changed, and now users expect more.</p>\r\n<p>The criteria we used to judge companies in 2011 were ambitious for the time, but they’ve been almost universally adopted in the years since then. Now, users should expect companies to far exceed the standards articulated in the original <em>Who Has Your Back</em> report. Users should look to companies like Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon to be transparent about the types of content that is blocked or censored in response to government requests, as well as what deleted data is kept around in case government agents seek it in the future. We also look to these companies to take a principled stance against government-mandated backdoors.</p>\r\n<p>In this, our fifth annual <em>Who Has Your Back</em> report, we took the main principles of the prior reports and rolled them into a single category: Industry-Accepted Best Practices. We’ve also refined our expectations around providing users notice and added new categories to highlight other important transparency and user rights issues.</p>\r\n<p>We think it’s time to expect more from Silicon Valley. We designed this report to take the basic principles of <em>Who Has Your Back</em> up a notch and see which companies were still leading the pack. Already, our newest report has had a similar effect on the industry as a whole, encouraging companies large and small to strive for more when it comes to standing by their users. In the months since we first told the companies what this year’s criteria would be, we’ve seen significant improvement in company practices. And we hope—and expect—that over the next year, we’ll see even more.</p>\r\n<p>Download the complete <em>Who Has Your Back? 2015: Protecting Your Data From Government Requests</em> report <a href=\"https://www.eff.org/files/2015/06/18/who_has_your_back_2015_protecting_your_data_from_government_requests_20150618.pdf\">as a PDF</a>.</p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "steps in the right direction"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+AI Ethics & Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Pro_User_Public_Policy_Opposing_Backdoors+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1368885,
      "name": "Electronic Frontier Foundation+Publishing Transparency Reports",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Publishing_Transparency_Reports.json",
      "designer": "Electronic Frontier Foundation",
      "title": "Publishing Transparency Reports",
      "question": "Does the company publish transparency reports?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In order to earn a gold star in this category, companies must provide reports on how often they provide data to the government. Users make decisions every day about which companies they will entrust with their data. It’s vital that companies are forthcoming about how often they hand that data to the government.</p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https://www.eff.org\">Electronic Frontier Foundation</a> evaluated whether companies publish the number of government demands they receive for user data, whether it’s an official demand such as a warrant or an unofficial request.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>EFF entrust its most sensitive, private, and important information to technology companies like Google, Facebook, and Verizon. Collectively, these companies are privy to the conversations, photos, social connections, and location data of almost everyone online. The choices these companies make affect the privacy of every one of their users. So which companies stand with their users, embracing transparency around government data requests? Which companies have resisted improper government demands by fighting for user privacy in the courts and on Capitol Hill? In short, which companies have your back?<br><br>These questions are even more important in the wake of the past year’s revelations about mass surveillance, which showcase how the United States government has been taking advantage of the rich trove of data EFF entrust to technology companies to engage in surveillance of millions of innocent people in the US and around the world. Internal NSA documents and public statements by government officials confirm that major telecommunications companies are an integral part of these programs. EFF is also faced with unanswered questions, conflicting statements, and troubling leaked documents which raise real questions about the government’s ability to access to the information they entrust to social networking sites and webmail providers.<br><br>The legal landscape is unsettled. The Electronic Frontier Foundation and other organizations have filed constitutional challenges to mass surveillance programs. Both Congress and President Obama are negotiating legislative reform that could curtail or even end bulk surveillance programs, while other Congressional proposals would instead enshrine them into law. In multiple recent public opinion polls, the American people attest that they believe government surveillance has gone too far.<br><br>In the face of unbounded surveillance, users of technology need to know which companies are willing to take a stand for the privacy of their users.<br><br>In this fourth-annual report, EFF examines the publicly-available policies of major Internet companies—including Internet service providers, email providers, mobile communications tools, telecommunications companies, cloud storage providers, location-based services, blogging platforms, and social networking sites—to assess whether they publicly commit to standing with users when the government seeks access to user data. The purpose of this report is to allow users to make informed decisions about the companies with whom they do business. It is also designed to incentivize companies to adopt best practices, be transparent about how data flows to the government, and to take a stand for their users’ privacy in Congress and in the courts whenever it is possible to do so.<br><br>The categories EFF evaluates in this report represent objectively verifiable, public criteria and so cannot and do not evaluate secret surveillance. They compiled the information in this report by examining each company’s published terms of service, privacy policy, transparency report, and guidelines for law enforcement requests, if any. As part of their evaluation, they contacted each company to explain treir findings and to give them an opportunity to provide evidence of improving policies and practices.</p>\r\n<p>Download the complete <em>Who Has Your Back? 2014: Protecting Your Data From Government Requests</em> report as <a href=\"https://www.eff.org/files/2014/05/15/who-has-your-back-2014-govt-data-requests.pdf\">a PDF</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "steps in the right direction"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 30,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Publishing_Transparency_Reports+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1369161,
      "name": "Electronic Frontier Foundation+Fights for users' privacy rights in courts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Fights_for_users_privacy_rights_in_courts.json",
      "designer": "Electronic Frontier Foundation",
      "title": "Fights for users' privacy rights in courts",
      "question": "Does the company fight for users' privacy rights in courts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies earn recognition in this category by going to court to fight for their users’ privacy interests in response to government demands for information — companies that have actually participated as litigants and made legal arguments defending their users’ privacy rights. Such an action is powerful proof of a company’s commitment to user privacy and its willingness to fight back when faced with an overbroad government request.</p>\r\n<p>Of course some companies may not have had occasion to defend users’ rights in court, others may successfully push back on overreaching law enforcement demands informally thus avoiding a court battle. Still others may be bound by the secrecy of gag orders accompanying National Security Letters, or imposed by court orders or statutes, leaving them unable to disclose the efforts they have made to protect their users’ interests. <strong>As a result, the lack of a star in this category should not be interpreted as a statement that the company failed to stand up for users</strong>. Instead, this category serves as special recognition for companies that were faced with a decision to defend user privacy in court, took action to defend that privacy, and could publicly disclose at least something about their efforts, even if it’s just the fact of having fought in court.</p>",
      "methodology": "<div>\r\n<p>EFF entrust its most sensitive, private, and important information to technology companies like Google, Facebook, and Verizon. Collectively, these companies are privy to the conversations, photos, social connections, and location data of almost everyone online. The choices these companies make affect the privacy of every one of their users. So which companies stand with their users, embracing transparency around government data requests? Which companies have resisted improper government demands by fighting for user privacy in the courts and on Capitol Hill? In short, which companies have your back?<br><br>These questions are even more important in the wake of the past year’s revelations about mass surveillance, which showcase how the United States government has been taking advantage of the rich trove of data EFF entrust to technology companies to engage in surveillance of millions of innocent people in the US and around the world. Internal NSA documents and public statements by government officials confirm that major telecommunications companies are an integral part of these programs. EFF is also faced with unanswered questions, conflicting statements, and troubling leaked documents which raise real questions about the government’s ability to access to the information they entrust to social networking sites and webmail providers.<br><br>The legal landscape is unsettled. The Electronic Frontier Foundation and other organizations have filed constitutional challenges to mass surveillance programs. Both Congress and President Obama are negotiating legislative reform that could curtail or even end bulk surveillance programs, while other Congressional proposals would instead enshrine them into law. In multiple recent public opinion polls, the American people attest that they believe government surveillance has gone too far.<br><br>In the face of unbounded surveillance, users of technology need to know which companies are willing to take a stand for the privacy of their users.<br><br>In this fourth-annual report, EFF examines the publicly-available policies of major Internet companies—including Internet service providers, email providers, mobile communications tools, telecommunications companies, cloud storage providers, location-based services, blogging platforms, and social networking sites—to assess whether they publicly commit to standing with users when the government seeks access to user data. The purpose of this report is to allow users to make informed decisions about the companies with whom they do business. It is also designed to incentivize companies to adopt best practices, be transparent about how data flows to the government, and to take a stand for their users’ privacy in Congress and in the courts whenever it is possible to do so.<br><br>The categories EFF evaluates in this report represent objectively verifiable, public criteria and so cannot and do not evaluate secret surveillance. They compiled the information in this report by examining each company’s published terms of service, privacy policy, transparency report, and guidelines for law enforcement requests, if any. As part of their evaluation, they contacted each company to explain treir findings and to give them an opportunity to provide evidence of improving policies and practices.</p>\r\n<p>Download the complete <em>Who Has Your Back? 2014: Protecting Your Data From Government Requests</em> report as <a href=\"https://www.eff.org/files/2014/05/15/who-has-your-back-2014-govt-data-requests.pdf\">a PDF</a>.</p>\r\n</div>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "steps in the right direction"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Cybersecurity Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 71,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 26,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Fights_for_users_privacy_rights_in_courts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1369619,
      "name": "Electronic Frontier Foundation+Fights for users' privacy rights in Congress",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Fights_for_users_privacy_rights_in_Congress.json",
      "designer": "Electronic Frontier Foundation",
      "title": "Fights for users' privacy rights in Congress",
      "question": "Does the company fight for users' privacy rights in Congress?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>While company policies are important, we shouldn’t be dependent on them to protect our privacy. The law should clearly protect the privacy of users even as technologies change. This is particularly important in the wake of the recent disclosures about mass surveillance, which show how far the government’s interpretation of the law has wandered from the statutory language and Congressional intent and how extensively the government has manipulated the legal language to try to provide leeway for surveillance abuses.</p>\r\n<p>The metric evaluates whether companies are working for lasting, permanent improvements in the law to safeguard their users’ privacy.</p>",
      "methodology": "<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p>EFF entrust its most sensitive, private, and important information to technology companies like Google, Facebook, and Verizon. Collectively, these companies are privy to the conversations, photos, social connections, and location data of almost everyone online. The choices these companies make affect the privacy of every one of their users. So which companies stand with their users, embracing transparency around government data requests? Which companies have resisted improper government demands by fighting for user privacy in the courts and on Capitol Hill? In short, which companies have your back?<br><br>These questions are even more important in the wake of the past year’s revelations about mass surveillance, which showcase how the United States government has been taking advantage of the rich trove of data EFF entrust to technology companies to engage in surveillance of millions of innocent people in the US and around the world. Internal NSA documents and public statements by government officials confirm that major telecommunications companies are an integral part of these programs. EFF is also faced with unanswered questions, conflicting statements, and troubling leaked documents which raise real questions about the government’s ability to access to the information they entrust to social networking sites and webmail providers.<br><br>The legal landscape is unsettled. The Electronic Frontier Foundation and other organizations have filed constitutional challenges to mass surveillance programs. Both Congress and President Obama are negotiating legislative reform that could curtail or even end bulk surveillance programs, while other Congressional proposals would instead enshrine them into law. In multiple recent public opinion polls, the American people attest that they believe government surveillance has gone too far.<br><br>In the face of unbounded surveillance, users of technology need to know which companies are willing to take a stand for the privacy of their users.<br><br>In this fourth-annual report, EFF examines the publicly-available policies of major Internet companies—including Internet service providers, email providers, mobile communications tools, telecommunications companies, cloud storage providers, location-based services, blogging platforms, and social networking sites—to assess whether they publicly commit to standing with users when the government seeks access to user data. The purpose of this report is to allow users to make informed decisions about the companies with whom they do business. It is also designed to incentivize companies to adopt best practices, be transparent about how data flows to the government, and to take a stand for their users’ privacy in Congress and in the courts whenever it is possible to do so.<br><br>The categories EFF evaluates in this report represent objectively verifiable, public criteria and so cannot and do not evaluate secret surveillance. They compiled the information in this report by examining each company’s published terms of service, privacy policy, transparency report, and guidelines for law enforcement requests, if any. As part of their evaluation, they contacted each company to explain treir findings and to give them an opportunity to provide evidence of improving policies and practices.</p>\r\n<p>Download the complete <em>Who Has Your Back? 2014: Protecting Your Data From Government Requests</em> report as <a href=\"https://www.eff.org/files/2014/05/15/who-has-your-back-2014-govt-data-requests.pdf\">a PDF</a>.</p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "steps in the right direction"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 72,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 26,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Fights_for_users_privacy_rights_in_Congress+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1369810,
      "name": "Electronic Frontier Foundation+Publishes law enforcement guidelines",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Publishes_law_enforcement_guidelines.json",
      "designer": "Electronic Frontier Foundation",
      "title": "Publishes law enforcement guidelines",
      "question": "Does the company publish law enforcement guidelines?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Electronic Frontier Foundation also evaluates whether companies publish their guidelines for law enforcement requests for user data. Law enforcement guides might provide insight into issues such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Whether a company requires a warrant for content;</li>\r\n<li>What types of data a company retains, and what kind of legal process the company requires for law enforcement to obtain various kinds of information;</li>\r\n<li>How long data is generally held by the company, and how long will it be held in response to a retention request;</li>\r\n<li>Whether the company has an exception for specific emergency or other kinds of disclosures; and</li>\r\n<li>Whether the company asks for reimbursement for the costs incurred in complying with a request for data.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>These published guidelines help us better understand what standards and rules law enforcement must follow when they seek access to sensitive user data on a variety of different platforms. They also help companies avoid receiving improper requests in the first place, by educating law enforcement about what they can and cannot obtain, and the standards that must be met.</p>",
      "methodology": "<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p>EFF entrust its most sensitive, private, and important information to technology companies like Google, Facebook, and Verizon. Collectively, these companies are privy to the conversations, photos, social connections, and location data of almost everyone online. The choices these companies make affect the privacy of every one of their users. So which companies stand with their users, embracing transparency around government data requests? Which companies have resisted improper government demands by fighting for user privacy in the courts and on Capitol Hill? In short, which companies have your back?<br><br>These questions are even more important in the wake of the past year’s revelations about mass surveillance, which showcase how the United States government has been taking advantage of the rich trove of data EFF entrust to technology companies to engage in surveillance of millions of innocent people in the US and around the world. Internal NSA documents and public statements by government officials confirm that major telecommunications companies are an integral part of these programs. EFF is also faced with unanswered questions, conflicting statements, and troubling leaked documents which raise real questions about the government’s ability to access to the information they entrust to social networking sites and webmail providers.<br><br>The legal landscape is unsettled. The Electronic Frontier Foundation and other organizations have filed constitutional challenges to mass surveillance programs. Both Congress and President Obama are negotiating legislative reform that could curtail or even end bulk surveillance programs, while other Congressional proposals would instead enshrine them into law. In multiple recent public opinion polls, the American people attest that they believe government surveillance has gone too far.<br><br>In the face of unbounded surveillance, users of technology need to know which companies are willing to take a stand for the privacy of their users.<br><br>In this fourth-annual report, EFF examines the publicly-available policies of major Internet companies—including Internet service providers, email providers, mobile communications tools, telecommunications companies, cloud storage providers, location-based services, blogging platforms, and social networking sites—to assess whether they publicly commit to standing with users when the government seeks access to user data. The purpose of this report is to allow users to make informed decisions about the companies with whom they do business. It is also designed to incentivize companies to adopt best practices, be transparent about how data flows to the government, and to take a stand for their users’ privacy in Congress and in the courts whenever it is possible to do so.<br><br>The categories EFF evaluates in this report represent objectively verifiable, public criteria and so cannot and do not evaluate secret surveillance. They compiled the information in this report by examining each company’s published terms of service, privacy policy, transparency report, and guidelines for law enforcement requests, if any. As part of their evaluation, they contacted each company to explain treir findings and to give them an opportunity to provide evidence of improving policies and practices.</p>\r\n<p>Download the complete <em>Who Has Your Back? 2014: Protecting Your Data From Government Requests</em> report as <a href=\"https://www.eff.org/files/2014/05/15/who-has-your-back-2014-govt-data-requests.pdf\">a PDF</a>.</p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "steps in the right direction"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 44,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 26,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Publishes_law_enforcement_guidelines+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1369966,
      "name": "Electronic Frontier Foundation+Requires warrant for content",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Requires_warrant_for_content.json",
      "designer": "Electronic Frontier Foundation",
      "title": "Requires warrant for content",
      "question": "Does the company require the government to get a warrant supported by probable cause before handing over contents of user communications?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies earn recognition if they require the government to get a warrant supported by probable cause before they will hand over the contents of user communications.</p>\r\n<p>EFF have this category because they believe that the Fourth Amendment protects communications stored with service providers, and the government must have a search warrant before it can seize those messages. This view was upheld by the 2010 Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in <cite>United States v. Warshak</cite>. This decision was a critical victory for Internet privacy, but represents the holding of one appeals court—and thus is not binding legal precedent throughout the entire country.</p>\r\n<p>EFF awards stars to companies that commit to following the Warshak standard nationwide. When companies require a warrant before turning over private messages to law enforcement, they ensure that private communications online are treated consistently with the protections the Fourth Amendment gives to communications that occur offline.</p>",
      "methodology": "<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p>EFF entrust its most sensitive, private, and important information to technology companies like Google, Facebook, and Verizon. Collectively, these companies are privy to the conversations, photos, social connections, and location data of almost everyone online. The choices these companies make affect the privacy of every one of their users. So which companies stand with their users, embracing transparency around government data requests? Which companies have resisted improper government demands by fighting for user privacy in the courts and on Capitol Hill? In short, which companies have your back?<br><br>These questions are even more important in the wake of the past year’s revelations about mass surveillance, which showcase how the United States government has been taking advantage of the rich trove of data EFF entrust to technology companies to engage in surveillance of millions of innocent people in the US and around the world. Internal NSA documents and public statements by government officials confirm that major telecommunications companies are an integral part of these programs. EFF is also faced with unanswered questions, conflicting statements, and troubling leaked documents which raise real questions about the government’s ability to access to the information they entrust to social networking sites and webmail providers.<br><br>The legal landscape is unsettled. The Electronic Frontier Foundation and other organizations have filed constitutional challenges to mass surveillance programs. Both Congress and President Obama are negotiating legislative reform that could curtail or even end bulk surveillance programs, while other Congressional proposals would instead enshrine them into law. In multiple recent public opinion polls, the American people attest that they believe government surveillance has gone too far.<br><br>In the face of unbounded surveillance, users of technology need to know which companies are willing to take a stand for the privacy of their users.<br><br>In this fourth-annual report, EFF examines the publicly-available policies of major Internet companies—including Internet service providers, email providers, mobile communications tools, telecommunications companies, cloud storage providers, location-based services, blogging platforms, and social networking sites—to assess whether they publicly commit to standing with users when the government seeks access to user data. The purpose of this report is to allow users to make informed decisions about the companies with whom they do business. It is also designed to incentivize companies to adopt best practices, be transparent about how data flows to the government, and to take a stand for their users’ privacy in Congress and in the courts whenever it is possible to do so.<br><br>The categories EFF evaluates in this report represent objectively verifiable, public criteria and so cannot and do not evaluate secret surveillance. They compiled the information in this report by examining each company’s published terms of service, privacy policy, transparency report, and guidelines for law enforcement requests, if any. As part of their evaluation, they contacted each company to explain treir findings and to give them an opportunity to provide evidence of improving policies and practices.</p>\r\n<p>Download the complete <em>Who Has Your Back? 2014: Protecting Your Data From Government Requests</em> report as <a href=\"https://www.eff.org/files/2014/05/15/who-has-your-back-2014-govt-data-requests.pdf\">a PDF</a>.</p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 44,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 26,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Requires_warrant_for_content+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1371053,
      "name": "Electronic Frontier Foundation+Tells users about data demands",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Tells_users_about_data_demands.json",
      "designer": "Electronic Frontier Foundation",
      "title": "Tells users about data demands",
      "question": "Does the company inform users about Law Enforcement Requests?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric requires a company to make a public promise to let users know when the government comes knocking, unless giving notice is prohibited by law or a court order. This commitment is important because it gives users a chance to defend themselves against government requests. In most situations, a user is in a better position than a company to challenge a government request for personal information, and of course, she has more incentive to do so.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>https://www.eff.org/who-has-your-back-2012</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "steps in the right direction"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 31,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Tells_users_about_data_demands+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1371206,
      "name": "Electronic Frontier Foundation+transparency regarding government requests",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+transparency_regarding_government_requests.json",
      "designer": "Electronic Frontier Foundation",
      "title": "transparency regarding government requests",
      "question": "Is the company transparent about when and how often it hands data to the government?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Electronic Frontier Foundation asks companies to do two things in order to earn a gold star in the transparency category: provide reports on how often they provide data to the government and publish their law enforcement guidelines. Users make decisions every day about which companies they will entrust with their data. It's vital that companies are forthcoming about how often and through what process they hand user data to the government.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>https://www.eff.org/who-has-your-back-2012</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "steps in the right direction"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 31,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+transparency_regarding_government_requests+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1378043,
      "name": "Vasiliki Gkatziaki+Total Scope 1 and 2 (tCO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Total_Scope_1_and_2_tCO2e.json",
      "designer": "Vasiliki Gkatziaki",
      "title": "Total Scope 1 and 2 (tCO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total reported Scope 1 (all direct emissions) and Scope 2 (indirect electricity emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This indicates the total reported Scope 1 (all direct emissions) and Scope 2 (indirect electricity emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Scope 1 emissions represent 'all direct emissions' arising from a company's direct operational activities.</li>\r\n<li>Scope 2 emissions represent 'indirect emissions' generated from the purchase of electricity.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Total GHG emissions are normally reported in tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e). CO2 equivalent is used to express the Global Warming Potential (GWP) of different Greenhouse Gases in one comparable metric. Given that CO2 is the most common man-made Greenhouse Gas, when combining different Greenhouse Gases, they are converted to Carbon Dioxide equivalent.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>http://www.eio.org.uk/etindex.php?page=FAQ#general_definitions_5</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tCO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 838,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 485,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Total_Scope_1_and_2_tCO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1381637,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Direct Economic Value Generated, GRI 201-1 (formerly G4-EC1-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Direct_Economic_Value_Generated_GRI_201_1_formerly_G4_EC1_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Direct Economic Value Generated, GRI 201-1 (formerly G4-EC1-a)",
      "question": "How much direct economic value (revenue) does the company generate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. <br><br>In the context of the GRI Standards, the economic dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the economic conditions of its stakeholders, and on economic systems at local, national, and global levels. GRI 201 addresses the topic of economic performance. <br><br>Information on the creation and distribution of economic value provides a basic indication of how an organization has created wealth for stakeholders. If presented in country-level detail, EVG&amp;D can provide a useful picture of the direct monetary value added to local economies.</p>\r\n<hr>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">*In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-EC1-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new [[https://wikirate.org/Source_000090307|GRI 201-1]] code is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found [[https://wikirate.org/Direct_Economic_Value_Generated_G4_EC1_a%20methodology|here]]. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the total Direct Economic Value Generated (<strong>revenue</strong>) of the organization for a specific year. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. </span></p>\r\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Answers &amp; Calculations </span></strong><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Revenue includes the following:</span><br><br><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"> 1. Revenues from financial investments including cash received as:</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><br><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"> • interest on financial loans;</span><br><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"> • dividends from shareholdings</span><br><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"> • royalties;</span><br><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"> • direct income generated from assets, such as property rental.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">2. Revenues from sale of assets including:</span><br><br><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"> • physical assets, such as property, infrastructure, and equipment;</span><br><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"> • intangibles, such as intellectual property rights, designs, and brand names</span></p>\r\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Units</span></strong><br><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"> The reporting unit is US Dollars. If the value is reported different currency please consult this [[https://wikirate.org/Researching_GRI_Metrics|page]] to find the conversion rate to use according to the company's reporting year. Once you have found the correct conversion rate, multiply that number by your answer to get the USD rate. Include this calculation in your comments.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Select the '<span style=\"background-color: #ffffff; color: #e03e2d;\">Unknown</span>' answer box if the company has not published the data.</span></p>\r\n<p><br><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"> Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 201 - Economic Performance",
        "GRI Standards+201-1 Direct economic value generated and distributed",
        "GRI Standards+201-1-a-i Direct economic value generated: revenues"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1069,
      "bookmarkers": 13,
      "datasets": 20,
      "companies": 498,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Shibojyoti_Dutta+Environmental_Fines_per_Million_Direct_Economic_Value_Generated.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Direct_Economic_Value_Generated_GRI_201_1_formerly_G4_EC1_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1382022,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Environmental impacts of transport (G4-EO3-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_impacts_of_transport_G4_EO3_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Environmental impacts of transport (G4-EO3-a)",
      "question": "Does the organization report on significant environmental impacts of transporting attendees to and from events?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator G4-EO3 – '<strong>Significant environmental</strong> and socio-economic <strong>impacts of transporting attendees to and from the event</strong>, and initiatives taken to address the impacts'.</p>\r\n<p>Attendee transport is often an event’s largest environmental impact. Environmental and socio-economic issues associated with transportation to the event include disruption to neighborhood amenity, localized air and noise pollution, health and safety, security, health impacts, along with greenhouse gas emissions from fuel combustion in the various modes of transport. Assessing the significant environmental and socio-economic impacts of transportation is part of a comprehensive approach to event planning.</p>\r\n<p>Refer to {{G4-EN30 | link; title:G4-EN30}} for reporting on significant environmental and socio-economic impacts of transporting products and other goods and materials used for the organization’s operations, and transporting members of the workforce.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>Indicate whether the organization reports</span><span> on significant environmental impacts of the transportation for attendees to and from the event</span><span> </span><span>by choosing </span><strong>Yes</strong><span> or </span><strong>No</strong><span>.</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>Environmental impacts</strong> of the transportation for attendees includes, but not limited to:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Energy use (e.g., oil, kerosene, fuel, electricity)</li>\r\n<li>Emissions (e.g., greenhouse gas emissions, ozonedepleting substances, NOX, SOX, and other air emissions)</li>\r\n<li>Effluents (e.g., different kinds of chemicals)</li>\r\n<li>Waste (e.g., different types of packaging material)</li>\r\n<li>Spills (e.g., spills of chemicals, oils, and fuels)</li>\r\n<li>Biodiversity</li>\r\n<li>Water</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>Attendees</strong><span> in these Sector Disclosures, refers to people who are present at an event, including delegates, customers, clients, audience, fans, spectators, or others present at the event.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>If provided, in the </span><strong>comments section</strong><span> include:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>The criteria and methodology used to determine which environmental impacts are significant;</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Quantifications of the significant environmental impacts of this transportation for attendees; and,</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Assumptions and methodologies used to compile this Indicator’s information, from event planning through execution.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Information for this Indicator may be found in reports from data providers and summary reports showing transport mode breakdowns and calculations of total; reports from national statistics and transport providers documenting energy demand and relevant emission data of event-related transport vehicles; and from local authorities or other bodies that monitor environmental quality, air and water emissions, noise, littering and relevant local nuisance.</p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 7,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_impacts_of_transport_G4_EO3_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1382051,
      "name": "Vasiliki Gkatziaki+Combined Scope 1, 2 and 3 Intensity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Combined_Scope_1_2_and_3_Intensity.json",
      "designer": "Vasiliki Gkatziaki",
      "title": "Combined Scope 1, 2 and 3 Intensity",
      "question": "What is the company's combined Scope 1, 2, and 3 CO2e Intensity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Combined Scope 1 + 2 + 3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions at 100% (disclosed or inferred) + 50% of Scope 3 emissions (disclosed or inferred). Inferred figures are based on the highest reported intensity for that sector, according to the Benchmark Company Tables.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Scope 1 emissions represent 'all direct emissions' arising from a company's direct operational activities.</li>\r\n<li>Scope 2 emissions represent 'indirect emissions' generated from the purchase of electricity.</li>\r\n<li>Scope 3 emissions represent 'all other indirect emissions', such as distribution of goods, transportation of purchased goods, transportation of waste, disposal of waste, investments, employee commuting, business travel etc. (The GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard proposes a total of 15 categories which can be viewed on the <a href=\"http://www.ghgprotocol.org/standards/scope-3-standard\">GHG Protocol</a> website.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p>http://www.eio.org.uk/etindex.php?page=FAQ#general_definitions_5</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1598,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 918,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Combined_Scope_1_2_and_3_Intensity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1384848,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Direct Economic Value Distributed, GRI 201-1 (G4-EC1-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Direct_Economic_Value_Distributed_GRI_201_1_G4_EC1_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Direct Economic Value Distributed, GRI 201-1 (G4-EC1-a)",
      "question": "How much economic value does the company distribute?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the <strong>economic dimension</strong> of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the economic conditions of its stakeholders, and on economic systems at local, national, and global levels. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">[[https://wikirate.org/Source_000090307|GRI 201]]addresses the topic of e<strong>conomic performance</strong>. This includes the economic value generated by an organization; its defined benefit plan obligations; the financial assistance it receives from any government; and the financial implications of climate change. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Information on the creation and distribution of economic value provides a basic indication of how an organization has created wealth for stakeholders. </span></p>\r\n<hr>\r\n<p><em><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-EC1-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 201-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found [[https://wikirate.org/Economic_Value_Distributed_G4_EC1_a_Methodology|here]].</span></em></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify the total Economic Value <strong>Distributed</strong> (operating costs, employee wages and benefits, payments to providers of capital, payments to government by country, and community investments) of the organization for a specific year.</p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. <br><br>Keywords and search terms for this metric: <br><br>- Economic Value Distributed <br>- 201<br>- GRI<br>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p>The distribution categories include:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Operating costs</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Employee wages and benefits</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Payments to providers of capital</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Payments to government</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li> Community investments</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>You can find more information on these categories [[https://wikirate.org/Source_000090307|here]].</p>\r\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"> Units</span></strong><br><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"> The reporting unit is US Dollars. If the value is reported different currency, please consult this [[https://wikirate.org/Researching_GRI_Metrics|page]] to find the conversion rate to use according to the company's reporting year. Once you have found the correct conversion rate, multiply that number by your answer to get the USD rate. Include this calculation in your comments.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. Select the '<strong><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\">Unknown</span></strong>' answer box if the company has not published the data. </span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Philanthropy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 201 - Economic Performance",
        "GRI Standards+201-1 Direct economic value generated and distributed",
        "GRI Standards+201-1-a-ii Economic value distributed: operating costs, employee wages and benefits, payments to providers of capital, payments to government by country, and community investments"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 244,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 13,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Direct_Economic_Value_Distributed_GRI_201_1_G4_EC1_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1387081,
      "name": "Vasiliki Gkatziaki+Scope 1 and 2 Intensity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Scope_1_and_2_Intensity.json",
      "designer": "Vasiliki Gkatziaki",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 Intensity",
      "question": "What is the company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 CO2e Intensity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions and dividing by its turnover. Where a company falls within the \"Incomplete\" or \"No Data\" categories, an inferred figure based on the highest reported intensity for that sector, across the Global ET Universe, is shown. Please see the Scope 1 + 2 Benchmark Companies Table for further clarification.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Scope 1 emissions represent 'all direct emissions' arising from a company's direct operational activities.</li>\r\n<li>Scope 2 emissions represent 'indirect emissions' generated from the purchase of electricity.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p>http://www.eio.org.uk/etindex.php?page=FAQ#general_definitions_5</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1593,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 919,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Scope_1_and_2_Intensity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1392200,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Socioeconomic impacts of transport (G4-EO3-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Socioeconomic_impacts_of_transport_G4_EO3_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Socioeconomic impacts of transport (G4-EO3-b)",
      "question": "Does the organization report on significant socio-economic impacts of transporting attendees to and from events?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>.  It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator G4-EO3 - '<strong>Significant</strong> environmental and <strong>socio-economic impacts of transporting attendees to and from the event</strong>, and initiatives taken to address the impacts'.</p>\r\n<p>Attendee transport is often an event’s largest environmental impact. Environmental and socio-economic issues associated with transportation to the event include disruption to neighborhood amenity, localized air and noise pollution, health and safety, security, health impacts, along with greenhouse gas emissions from fuel combustion in the various modes of transport. Assessing the significant environmental and socio-economic impacts of transportation is part of a comprehensive approach to event planning.</p>\r\n<p>Refer to {{G4-EN30 | link; title:G4-EN30}} for reporting on significant environmental and socio-economic impacts of transporting products and other goods and materials used for the organization’s operations, and transporting members of the workforce.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Indicate whether the organization reports on significant socio-economic impacts of the transportation for attendees to and from the event by choosing <strong>Yes</strong> or <strong>No</strong>.</p><p><strong>Socio-economic impacts</strong> of the transportation for attendees including, but not limited to:</p><ul><li><p>Littering</p></li><li><p>Noise and nuisance</p></li><li><p>Accessibility</p></li><li><p>Safety and security</p></li><li><p>Damage or deterioration of transport facilities</p></li><li><p>Capacity shortage for local transport</p></li><li><p>Disruption to neighborhood amenity </p></li></ul><p><strong>Attendees</strong> in these Sector Disclosures, refers to people who are present at an event, including delegates, customers, clients, audience, fans, spectators, or others present at the event.</p><p>If provided, in the <strong>comments section</strong> include:</p><ul><li><p>The criteria and methodology used to determine which socio-economic impacts are significant;</p></li><li><p>Quantifications of the significant socio-economic impacts of this transportation for attendees; and,</p></li><li><p>Assumptions and methodologies used to compile this Indicator’s information, from event planning through execution.</p></li></ul><p>Information for this Indicator may be found in reports from data providers and summary reports showing transport mode breakdowns and calculations of total; reports from national statistics and transport providers documenting energy demand and relevant emission data of event-related transport vehicles; and from local authorities or other bodies that monitor environmental quality, air and water emissions, noise, littering and relevant local nuisance.</p><p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate_Social_Responsibility_Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Socioeconomic_impacts_of_transport_G4_EO3_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1392391,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Sales Revenue Net",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Sales_Revenue_Net.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Sales Revenue Net",
      "question": "What is the company's total revenue from sale of goods and services rendered during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Total revenue from sale of goods and services rendered during the reporting period, in the normal course of business, reduced by sales returns and allowances, and sales discounts.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 15346,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 2246,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Sales_Revenue_Net+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1404554,
      "name": "Hala @WR+Ceres Company Network Members",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Hala_WR+Ceres_Company_Network_Members.json",
      "designer": "Hala @WR",
      "title": "Ceres Company Network Members",
      "question": "What are the companies that form the Ceres company network?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies in the Ceres Network understand that environmental and social sustainability issues present risks for their business, and that to achieve competitive advantage they must integrate sustainability considerations into core business strategies and decision-making. See: http://www.ceres.org/company-network/how-we-work-with-companies</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To find out whether a company is a member of the Ceres network, go to the Ceres Company Network [[http://www.ceres.org/company-network/company-directory| page]] and find the company you would like to research.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Hala_WR+Ceres_Company_Network_Members+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1404623,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Transport initiatives (G4-EO3-c)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Transport_initiatives_G4_EO3_c.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Transport initiatives (G4-EO3-c)",
      "question": "Ratio of kg CO2 emitted per tonne transported",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. <span> </span><span>It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator G4-EO3  </span><span>-</span><span> '</span>Significant<span> environmental and </span>socio-economic impacts of transporting attendees to and from the event<span>, and <strong>initiatives taken to address the impacts</strong>'.</span></p>\r\n<p>Attendee transport is often an event’s largest environmental impact. Environmental and socio-economic issues associated with transportation to the event include disruption to neighborhood amenity, localized air and noise pollution, health and safety, security, health impacts, along with greenhouse gas emissions from fuel combustion in the various modes of transport. Assessing the significant environmental and socio-economic impacts of transportation is part of a comprehensive approach to event planning.</p>\r\n<p>Refer to {{G4-EN30 | link; title:G4-EN30}} for reporting on significant environmental and socio-economic impacts of transporting products and other goods and materials used for the organization’s operations, and transporting members of the workforce.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>Indicate whether the organization reports</span><span></span><span> initiatives to improve environmental and social performance and improve the sustainability of a given </span><span>mode of transportation (e.g., switching vehicle fleet from </span><span>diesel to compressed natural gas or electric) </span><span>by choosing </span><strong>Yes</strong><span> or </span><strong>No</strong><span>.</span></p>\r\n<p>If provided, in the <strong>comments section</strong> include the <strong>results of the initiatives</strong> reported on environmental and socio-economic performance.</p>\r\n<p>Information for this Indicator may be found in reports from data providers and summary reports showing transport mode breakdowns and calculations of total; reports from national statistics and transport providers documenting energy demand and relevant emission data of event-related transport vehicles; and from local authorities or other bodies that monitor environmental quality, air and water emissions, noise, littering and relevant local nuisance.</p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Transport_initiatives_G4_EO3_c+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1409467,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Socially inclusive initiatives (G4-EO5-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Socially_inclusive_initiatives_G4_EO5_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Socially inclusive initiatives (G4-EO5-a)",
      "question": "Does the organization report on types of initiatives taken to create socially inclusive events?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator G4-EO5 – '<strong>Type</strong> and impacts <strong>of initiatives to create a socially inclusive event</strong>'.</p>\r\n<p>This Indicator is broader than depicted within this metric description. It also asks for commentary on the<strong> </strong>impacts<strong> </strong>of initiatives taken to create a socially inclusive event.</p>\r\n<p>An event can increase its sustainability potential by sharing its benefits throughout the event life cycle as fairly and meaningfully as possible across all interested parties regardless of race, age, gender, color, religion, sexual orientation, culture, national origin, income or disability (mental, intellectual, sensorial and physical). Every step should be taken to maximize the inclusivity of the event throughout the event life cycle.</p>\r\n<p>Social inclusivity refers to affordability, access to and awareness of the event through public media, accessibility of event content and other relevant information, and access to benefits from the event for all key stakeholders, including those who may otherwise be unable to participate.</p>\r\n<p>Initiatives to address access difficulties can be reported in {{EO6 | link; title:EO6}} ‘Type and impacts of initiatives to create an accessible environment’.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span></span><span>Indicate whether the organization reports on the types of initiatives taken to create a socially inclusive event by choosing <strong>Yes</strong> or <strong>No</strong>.</span><span> </span></p>\r\n<p>An <strong>i<span>nclusive event </span></strong><span>in these Sector Disclosures, refers to a</span>n event that enables stakeholders to: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Freely express who they are, their own opinions and points of view;</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Fully participate in the event equally, safely, confidently, independently, and with dignity regardless of race, age, gender, color, religion, sexual orientation, culture, national origin, income, or disability (mental, intellectual, sensorial and physical); and </span></li>\r\n<li><span>Feel safe from abuse, harassment or unfair criticism.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span>If provided, in the </span><strong>comments section</strong><span> include <strong>e</strong></span><span><strong>xamples of initiatives</strong> to include these stakeholders throughout the event life cycle, including but not limited to: bidding, planning, procurement, recruitment, execution, ticketing attendance, communication and post event.</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 15,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Socially_inclusive_initiatives_G4_EO5_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1415954,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Impacts of socially inclusive initiatives (G4-EO5-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Impacts_of_socially_inclusive_initiatives_G4_EO5_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Impacts of socially inclusive initiatives (G4-EO5-b)",
      "question": "Does the organization report the impacts of initiatives taken to create socially inclusive events?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator G4-EO5 – 'Type and<strong> impacts of initiatives to create a socially inclusive event</strong>'.</p>\r\n<p>An event can increase its sustainability potential by sharing its benefits throughout the event life cycle as fairly and meaningfully as possible across all interested parties regardless of race, age, gender, color, religion, sexual orientation, culture, national origin, income or disability (mental, intellectual, sensorial and physical). Every step should be taken to maximize the inclusivity of the event throughout the event life cycle.</p>\r\n<p>Social inclusivity refers to affordability, access to and awareness of the event through public media, accessibility of event content and other relevant information, and access to benefits from the event for all key stakeholders, including those who may otherwise be unable to participate.</p>\r\n<p>Initiatives to address access difficulties can be reported in {{EO6 | link; title:EO6}} ‘Type and impacts of initiatives to create an accessible environment’.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>Indicate whether the organization reports on the impacts of initiatives taken to create a socially inclusive event by choosing <strong>Yes</strong> or <strong>No</strong>.</span><span> </span></p>\r\n<p>An <strong>inclusive event </strong>in these Sector Disclosures, refers to an event that enables stakeholders to: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Freely express who they are, their own opinions and points of view;</li>\r\n<li>Fully participate in the event equally, safely, confidently, independently, and with dignity regardless of race, age, gender, color, religion, sexual orientation, culture, national origin, income, or disability (mental, intellectual, sensorial and physical); and</li>\r\n<li>Feel safe from abuse, harassment or unfair criticism.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span>If provided, in the </span><strong>comments section</strong><span> include details about:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>The <strong>type and impact of these initiatives</strong> to make the event environment inclusive. For example, where initiatives to provide tickets or access to a specific population are implemented, report the number of recipients or the people impacted.</span></li>\r\n<li>The marketing and communications strategies, designs or amendments that provide <strong>access to information</strong>, before, during and after the event.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Impacts_of_socially_inclusive_initiatives_G4_EO5_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1416048,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Accessibility initiatives (G4-EO6-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Accessibility_initiatives_G4_EO6_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Accessibility initiatives (G4-EO6-a)",
      "question": "Does the organization report on type of initiatives taken to create an accessible environment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator G4-EO6 – '<strong>Type</strong> and impacts <strong>of initiatives to create an accessible environment</strong>'.</p>\r\n<p>Access is a fundamental component of human rights and social justice. An accessible event environment is one with no barriers (including non-physical barriers) preventing it from being used equally, safely, confidently, independently and with dignity by everyone.</p>\r\n<p>Refer to {{EO5 | link; title:EO5}} to report on broader social inclusivity issues.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Indicate whether the organization reports on the types of initiatives taken to create an accessible environment by choosing <strong>Yes</strong> or <strong>No</strong>. </p>\r\n<p><span>An </span><strong><span>accessible environment</span></strong><strong> </strong><span>in these Sector Disclosures, refers to a</span>n environment with no barriers (including nonphysical barriers) preventing it from being used equally, safely, confidently, independently, and with dignity by everyone.</p>\r\n<p>An <strong>event environment</strong><strong> </strong><span>in these Sector Disclosures, refers</span><span> to primary event sites, offsite and satellite events, and any other relevant areas of service activity, including amenities (such as food, sanitation and accommodation) and transportation to the event.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>If provided, in the </span><strong>comments section</strong><span> include <strong>e</strong></span><span><strong>xamples of initiatives</strong> to </span><span>create an accessible environment.</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 15,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Accessibility_initiatives_G4_EO6_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1416857,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Impacts of accessibility initiatives (G4-EO6-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Impacts_of_accessibility_initiatives_G4_EO6_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Impacts of accessibility initiatives (G4-EO6-b)",
      "question": "Does the organization report the impacts of initiatives taken to create an accessible environment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator G4-EO6 – 'Type and <strong>impacts</strong> <strong>of initiatives to create an accessible environment</strong>'.</p>\r\n<p>Access is a fundamental component of human rights and social justice. An accessible event environment is one with no barriers (including non-physical barriers) preventing it from being used equally, safely, confidently, independently and with dignity by everyone.</p>\r\n<p>Refer to {{EO5 | link; title:EO5}} to report on broader social inclusivity issues.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Indicate whether the organization reports on the impacts of initiatives to create an accessible environment <span>by choosing </span><strong>Yes</strong><span> </span><span>or</span><span> </span><strong>No</strong><span>. </span></p>\r\n<p>An <strong>accessible environment</strong><strong> </strong>in these Sector Disclosures, refers to an environment with no barriers (including nonphysical barriers) preventing it from being used equally, safely, confidently, independently, and with dignity by everyone.</p>\r\n<p>An <strong>event environment</strong><strong> </strong>in these Sector Disclosures, refers to primary event sites, offsite and satellite events, and any other relevant areas of service activity, including amenities (such as food, sanitation and accommodation) and transportation to the event.</p>\r\n<p>If provided, in the <strong>comments section</strong> include details about the <strong>impact of these initiatives</strong> to make the event environment accessible. For example, <span>increased numbers of attendees and participants who are content providers now able to participate.</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Impacts_of_accessibility_initiatives_G4_EO6_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1468437,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Total materials used, GRI 301-1 (formerly G4-EN1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_materials_used_GRI_301_1_formerly_G4_EN1.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Total materials used, GRI 301-1 (formerly G4-EN1)",
      "question": "What is the total weight of materials that are used to produce and package the organization's primary products and services during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090310\">GRI 301</a> addresses the topic of materials. The inputs used to manufacture and package an organization’s products and services can be nonrenewable materials, such as minerals, metals, oil, gas, or coal; or renewable materials, such as wood or water. Both renewable and non-renewable materials can be composed of virgin or recycled input materials. </p>\r\n<p>The type and amount of materials the organization uses can indicate its dependence on natural resources, and the impacts it has on their availability. The organization’s contribution to resource conservation can be indicated by its approach to recycling, reusing and reclaiming materials, products, and packaging. </p>\r\n<p>The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to materials, and how it manages these impacts.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">G4-EN1 is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, and the</span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\"> new GRI 301-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Total_Materials_Used_G4_EN1_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify the total weight of materials used by the organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords and search terms for this metric</strong></p>\r\n<p>- Material</p>\r\n<p>- Product</p>\r\n<p>- 301-1</p>\r\n<p>- GRI</p>\r\n<p>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong></p>\r\n<p>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Units</strong></p>\r\n<p>Companies may report material weight in hundreds, thousands or millions of tonnes. Make sure you check the unit of measurement and enter the full number into the answer field.</p>\r\n<p>E.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes material' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500,000 tonnes'</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 301 - Materials",
        "GRI Standards+301-1 Materials used by weight or volume",
        "GRI Standards+301-1-a Materials used to produce and package primary products and services - resource type, total weight, and total volume"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 129,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 10,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_materials_used_GRI_301_1_formerly_G4_EN1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1468458,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Total non-renewable materials used, GRI 301-1 (formerly G4-EN1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_non_renewable_materials_used_GRI_301_1_formerly_G4_EN1.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Total non-renewable materials used, GRI 301-1 (formerly G4-EN1)",
      "question": "What is the total weight of non-renewable materials that are used to produce and package the organization's primary products and services during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090310\">GRI 301</a> addresses the topic of materials. The inputs used to manufacture and package an organization’s products and services can be nonrenewable materials, such as minerals, metals, oil, gas, or coal; or renewable materials, such as wood or water. Both renewable and non-renewable materials can be composed of virgin or recycled input materials. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The type and amount of materials the organization uses can indicate its dependence on natural resources, and the impacts it has on their availability. The organization’s contribution to resource conservation can be indicated by its approach to recycling, reusing and reclaiming materials, products, and packaging. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to materials, and how it manages these impacts.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">G4-EN1 is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, and the</span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> new GRI 301-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Non_renewable_Materials_Used_G4_EN1_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the total weight of non-renewable materials used by the organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Material</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Product</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Non-renewable</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- 301-1</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Companies may report material weight in hundreds, thousands or millions of tonnes. Make sure you check the unit of measurement and enter the full number into the answer field.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">E.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes material' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500,000 tonnes'</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 301 - Materials",
        "GRI Standards+301-1 Materials used by weight or volume"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_non_renewable_materials_used_GRI_301_1_formerly_G4_EN1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1468470,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Total renewable materials used, GRI 301-1 (formerly G4-EN1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_renewable_materials_used_GRI_301_1_formerly_G4_EN1.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Total renewable materials used, GRI 301-1 (formerly G4-EN1)",
      "question": "What is the total weight of renewable materials that are used to produce and package the organization's primary products and services during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090310\">GRI 301</a> addresses the topic of materials. The inputs used to manufacture and package an organization’s products and services can be nonrenewable materials, such as minerals, metals, oil, gas, or coal; or renewable materials, such as wood or water. Both renewable and non-renewable materials can be composed of virgin or recycled input materials. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The type and amount of materials the organization uses can indicate its dependence on natural resources, and the impacts it has on their availability. The organization’s contribution to resource conservation can be indicated by its approach to recycling, reusing and reclaiming materials, products, and packaging. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to materials, and how it manages these impacts.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">G4-EN1 is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, and the</span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> new GRI 301-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Renewable_Materials_Used_G4_EN1_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the total weight of renewable materials used by the organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Material</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Product</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Renewable</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- 301-1</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Companies may report material weight in hundreds, thousands or millions of tonnes. Make sure you check the unit of measurement and enter the full number into the answer field.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">E.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes material' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500,000 tonnes'</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 301 - Materials",
        "GRI Standards+301-2 Recycled input materials used",
        "GRI Standards+301-2-a Percentage of recycled input materials used to manufacture primary products and services"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 137,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 104,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_renewable_materials_used_GRI_301_1_formerly_G4_EN1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1497312,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Modes of transport (G4-EO2-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Modes_of_transport_G4_EO2_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Modes of transport (G4-EO2-a)",
      "question": "Does the organization report the modes of transport taken by attendees to the event?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator G4-EO2 - '<strong>Modes of transport taken by attendees as a percentage of total transportation</strong>, and initiatives to encourage the use of sustainable transport options.'</p>\r\n<p>Attendee transport is often an event’s largest environmental impact. Reporting the proportion of different transport modes used can help to define the impacts of the event, provide an overview of the uptake of more sustainable transport options, and identify opportunities for future improvement.</p>\r\n<p>In some event locations, certain transport modes may not be available or appropriate for all attendees. Contextual information should be provided that explains the local transport situation, including the availability of public transport options and the suitability of these options for event attendees.</p>\r\n<p>In many instances, event organizers will not have direct control over how attendees travel to and from the event. Reporting contextual information would be helpful to explain the level control and influence on attendee behavior, along with the boundary of control and influence that the event organizer has over the transport mode options available.</p>\r\n<p>Refer to {{EO11 | link; title:EO11}} for reporting on number, type and impact of sustainability initiatives designed to raise awareness, share knowledge and impact behavior change and results achieved.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Indicate whether the organization reports the transport used by attendees up to the event ‘access point’ by mode and distance <span>by choosing </span><strong>Yes</strong><span> or </span><strong>No</strong><span>.</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>Access point<span> </span></strong><span>in these Sector Disclosures, refers to </span>point where the event organizer takes over control of attendees’ access to the event venue.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Attendees</strong> in these Sector Disclosures, refers to people who are present at an event, including delegates, customers, clients, audience, fans, spectators, or others present at the event.</p>\r\n<p>If provided, in the <strong>comments section</strong> include the <strong>percentage breakdown </strong>of total transportation, on the basis of <strong>number of people or trips</strong>, broken down by different <strong>distance </strong>categories and <span>by <strong>modes</strong> identified, inlcuding:</span><span><br></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Train</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Coach (inter-city)</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Shuttle service (e.g., from train station to event gate)</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Urban transport (inner city bus, metro, underground,</span></li>\r\n<li><span>light rail, tram)</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Taxi, auto rickshaw, bike rickshaw</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Plane</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Private car (including car sharing)</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Motorcycle/scooter</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Non-automotive mode (bicycle, walking, animal)</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Ferry</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Information for this Indicator may be found in reports from data providers, and summary reports showing transport mode breakdowns and calculations of total; from ticketing providers (for postcode data on ticket purchases, as a proxy for origin destination); from travel agents or internal staff coordinating travel requirements; local authorities or other bodies that monitor transport within the locality, region, or nation; transport providers and car park operators; surveys; registration reports.</p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Modes_of_transport_G4_EO2_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1499518,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Sustainable transport initiatives (G4-EO2-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Sustainable_transport_initiatives_G4_EO2_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Sustainable transport initiatives (G4-EO2-b)",
      "question": "Does the organization report on initiatives undertaken to encourage the use of sustainable transport options?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator G4-EO2 - 'Modes of transport taken by attendees as a percentage of total transportation, and <strong>initiatives to encourage the use of sustainable transport options</strong>.'</p>\r\n<p>Attendee transport is often an event’s largest environmental impact. Reporting the proportion of different transport modes used can help to define the impacts of the event, provide an overview of the uptake of more sustainable transport options, and identify opportunities for future improvement.</p>\r\n<p>In some event locations, certain transport modes may not be available or appropriate for all attendees. Contextual information should be provided that explains the local transport situation, including the availability of public transport options and the suitability of these options for event attendees.</p>\r\n<p>In many instances, event organizers will not have direct control over how attendees travel to and from the event. Reporting contextual information would be helpful to explain the level control and influence on attendee behavior, along with the boundary of control and influence that the event organizer has over the transport mode options available.</p>\r\n<p>Refer to {{EO11 | link; title:EO11}} for reporting on number, type and impact of sustainability initiatives designed to raise awareness, share knowledge and impact behavior change and results achieved.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span></span><span>Indicate whether the organization reports</span> on initiatives undertaken to encourage uptake of the most sustainable transport options by choosing <strong>Yes</strong> or <strong>No</strong>.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Attendees</strong> in these Sector Disclosures, refers to people who are present at an event, including delegates, customers, clients, audience, fans, spectators, or others present at the event.</p>\r\n<p><span>If provided, in the <strong>comments section</strong> include:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>The r</span><span>eported <strong>initiatives</strong> undertaken to encourage uptake of the most sustainable transport options (e.g., incentives to take bus or bicycle to the event).</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Details of</span> any <strong>increases in the uptake</strong> of more sustainable transport options, where comparable data baselines are available.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Information for this Indicator may be found in reports from data providers, and summary reports showing transport mode breakdowns and calculations of total; from ticketing providers (for postcode data on ticket purchases, as a proxy for origin destination); from travel agents or internal staff coordinating travel requirements; local authorities or other bodies that monitor transport within the locality, region, or nation; transport providers and car park operators; surveys; registration reports.</p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Sustainable_transport_initiatives_G4_EO2_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1500914,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Sourcing initiatives (G4-EO9)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Sourcing_initiatives_G4_EO9.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Sourcing initiatives (G4-EO9)",
      "question": "Does the organization report on the type of sustainable sourcing initiatives and quantitative outcomes of sustainable sourcing initiatives?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers the reporting requirements of Indicator G4-EO9 - '<strong>Type</strong> <strong>and sustainability performance</strong> <strong>of sourcing initiatives</strong>'</p>\r\n<p>Event organizers have the potential to influence the sustainability performance of their event through their sourcing management approach. This Indicator will identify whether companies are working with suppliers that are compliant with their sustainable sourcing policy.</p>\r\n<p>Internationally and nationally recognized production standards, certifications and protocols have been developed for a large number of product categories and industries. Detailed sustainability requirements are included. By complying with these standards, basic levels of sustainability are guaranteed on a large number of issues.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span></span><span>Indicate whether the organization reports on the </span><span>on the </span><span>type of sustainable sourcing initiatives and </span><span>quantitative outcomes of sustainable sourcing initiatives</span><span> by choosing </span><strong>Yes</strong><span> or </span><strong>No</strong><span>.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>If provided, in the <strong>comments section</strong> include </span><span>type of sustainable sourcing initiatives and </span><span>quantitative outcomes of sustainable sourcing initiatives, </span><span>such as:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Events (products) procured with enhanced sustainability </span><span>credentials or certifications (for example Marine</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Stewardship Council, Fair trade, organic, eco-label, </span><span>industry codes of practice, Rainforest Alliance </span><span>certification, Forest Stewardship Council);</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Events (products) procured with fair labor practices;</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Reused, recycled or repurposed materials sourced;</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Seasonal and short travelled food;</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Value and/or percentage of spending on local, regional </span><span>and national target communities;</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Proportion of the supply chain that has been </span><span>independently audited for sustainability standards.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Sourcing_initiatives_G4_EO9+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1501029,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Habitats Protected or Restored G4-EN13-a",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Habitats_Protected_or_Restored_G4_EN13_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Habitats Protected or Restored G4-EN13-a",
      "question": "What is the total size of all natural habitat areas that have been protected or restored by the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>​<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. </span><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #495057; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric relating to habitats protected and restored (G4-EN13-a) can be found </span><a href=\"/Habitats_Protected_or_Restored_G4_EN13_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"text-decoration: none;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #03998d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">here</span></a><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial; color: #495057; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water, and ecosystems. </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><strong>GRI 304 addresses the topic of biodiversity</strong>. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Protecting biological diversity is important for ensuring the survival of plant and animal species, genetic diversity, and natural ecosystems. In addition, natural ecosystems provide clean water and air, and contribute to food security and human health. Biodiversity also contributes directly to local livelihoods, making it essential for achieving poverty reduction, and thus sustainable development. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">These concepts are covered in key instruments of the United Nations: see References. The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to biodiversity, and how it manages them.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This disclosure addresses the extent of an organization’s prevention and remediation activities with respect to its impacts on biodiversity.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This disclosure refers to areas where remediation has been completed or where the area is actively protected. Areas where operations are still active can be counted if they conform to the definitions of ‘area restored’ or ‘area protected’.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Definitions</strong>:</p>\r\n<p><strong>Area protected</strong><strong>:</strong> area that is protected from any harm during operational activities, and where the environment remains in its original state with a healthy and functioning ecosystem<br><strong>Area restored</strong><strong>:</strong> area that was used during or affected by operational activities, and where remediation measures have either<br>restored the environment to its original state, or to a state where it has a healthy and functioning ecosystem</p>\r\n<p>[[https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1011/gri-304-biodiversity-2016.pdf|Source: GRI 2016]]</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations: </span>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always add the <strong>page number</strong> where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report using differing methodologies and units. To answer this metric correctly, <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">make sure you check the unit of measurement and enter the correct number according to the metric unit in the answer field</span>.</p>\r\n<p>1 Hectare is equal to 0.01 square kilometer (km2).</p>\r\n<p>1 hectare = 1 × 10000 = <span>10000</span> square meters.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "hectares",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 304 - Biodiversity 2016",
        "GRI Standards+304-3 Habitats protected or restored",
        "GRI Standards+304-3-a Habitat areas protected or restored - size, location, and whether restoration success was validated by external professionals",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E4 - Biodiversity and Ecosystems",
        "ESRS Standards+E4.4 - Targets related to biodiversity and ecosystems"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 295,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 14,
      "companies": 130,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Habitats_Protected_or_Restored_G4_EN13_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1510070,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Operational Sites In or Adjacent to Protect Areas G4-EN11",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Operational_Sites_In_or_Adjacent_to_Protect_Areas_G4_EN11.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Operational Sites In or Adjacent to Protect Areas G4-EN11",
      "question": "What number of operational sites does the company own, lease, manage in, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>​This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/biodiversity/Pages/G4-EN11.aspx|G4-EN11]] - '</span>Operational sites owned, leased, managed in, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas'.</p>\r\n<p><span>​By reporting on the potential impact on land that lies within, contains, or is adjacent to legally protected areas, and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas, an organization can identify and understand certain risks associated with biodiversity. Monitoring which activities are taking place in both protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas makes it possible for the organization to reduce the risks of impacts. It also makes it possible for the organization to manage impacts on biodiversity or to avoid mismanagement. Failure to adequately manage such impacts may result in reputational damage, delays in obtaining planning permission, and the loss of the social license to operate.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>​To calculate the </span>number of operational sites in, or adjacent to, protected areas<span> - </span><span>[[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/biodiversity/Pages/G4-EN11.aspx|G4-EN11]]</span><span>:</span><span>​</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>​Identify the location and size of operational sites that are owned, leased, managed in, adjacent to, or that contain, protected areas or areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas. Include information about sites for which future operations have been formally announced.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>Relevant Definitions:</strong></p>\r\n<p><em> Areas of high biodiversity value</em></p>\r\n<p><span>Areas not subject to legal protection but recognized for important biodiversity features by a number of governmental and non-governmental organizations. These include habitats that are a priority for conservation (often defined in National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans prepared under the UN ‘Convention on Biological Diversity’ (</span><a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#83\" title=\"Reference number 83\">83</a><span>)</span><span>)</span><span>. Several international conservation organizations have identified particular areas of high biodiversity value.</span><br><a></a><br><em>Areas protected</em></p>\r\n<p><span>Areas that are protected from any harm during operational activities, and the environment remains in its original state with a healthy functioning ecosystem.</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><span>Reporting on this Indicator should include the following contextual information as a comment to the metric value:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>G4-EN11-a: the following information for each operational site owned, leased, managed in, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas:</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<ul>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Geographic location</li>\r\n<li>Subsurface and underground land that may be owned, leased, or managed by the organization</li>\r\n<li>Position in relation to the protected area (in the area, adjacent to, or containing portions of the protected area) or the high biodiversity value area outside protected areas</li>\r\n<li>Type of operation (office, manufacturing or production, or extractive)</li>\r\n<li>Size of operational site in km<sup>2</sup></li>\r\n<li>Biodiversity value characterized by:</li>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>The attribute of the protected area or high biodiversity value area outside the protected area (terrestrial, freshwater, or maritime ecosystem)</li>\r\n<li>Listing of protected status (such as IUCN Protected Area Management Categories (<a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#67\" title=\"Reference number 67\">67</a>), Ramsar Convention (<a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#78\" title=\"Reference number 78\">78</a>), national legislation)</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</ul>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "km2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 304 - Biodiversity 2016",
        "GRI Standards+304-1 Operational sites owned, leased, managed in, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas",
        "GRI Standards+304-1-a Operational sites owned, leased, managed in, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E4 - Biodiversity and Ecosystems"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Operational_Sites_In_or_Adjacent_to_Protect_Areas_G4_EN11+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1510684,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Financial and in kind benefits (G4-EO10-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Financial_and_in_kind_benefits_G4_EO10_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Financial and in kind benefits (G4-EO10-a)",
      "question": "Does the organization report on type of benefits, financial and in kind, received by the event organizer from suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers the reporting requirements of Indicator G4-EO9 - '<strong>Type</strong>, amount and impact<strong> of benefits, financial and in kind, received by the event organizer from suppliers</strong>'. </p>\r\n<p>In the event industry, the event organizer may receive financial commissions, in kind products and services and other benefit from the supply chain. Transparent reporting in this area is relevant for stakeholders to understand how sourcing decisions could be influenced.</p>\r\n<p>Financial and in kind benefits can be part of regular business practice, but significant benefits or patterns of the provision of benefits can signal an excessive level of supplier influence.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Indicate whether the organization reports on the on the type of benefits, financial and in kind, received by the event organizer from suppliers<span> by choosing <strong>Yes</strong> or <strong>No</strong>.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>A <strong>b</strong></span><strong><span>enefit</span></strong><strong> </strong><span>in these Sector Disclosures, refers to </span>a gain that improves or promotes wellbeing or provides an advantage. In this Indicator, may include for example a gratuity, gift, commission or sole supplier deal.</p>\r\n<p>If provided, in the <strong>comments section</strong> include details about:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>The type and financial value of each type of financial and in kind benefit received. Benefits should include commissions, gifts and value in kind.</li>\r\n<li>The type of suppliers providing benefits and the percentage of suppliers with whom there is a benefit relationship in place.</li>\r\n<li>The percentage of the organization’s workforce (paid employees, volunteers, contracted labor and, where relevant, participants who are content providers including athletes, artists or speakers) receiving benefits.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Financial_and_in_kind_benefits_G4_EO10_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1510908,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Affected IUCN Red List and Conservation List Species, GRI 304-4-a (formerly G4-EN14)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Affected_IUCN_Red_List_and_Conservation_List_Species_GRI_304_4_a_formerly_G4_EN14.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Affected IUCN Red List and Conservation List Species, GRI 304-4-a (formerly G4-EN14)",
      "question": "What is the total number of IUCN Red List species and national conservation list species with habitats in areas affected by the companies' operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards).</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">G4-EN14-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span>, and the new </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">GRI 304-4</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span>. The </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <a href=\"/Affected_IUCN_Red_List_and_National_Conservation_List_Species_G4_EN14_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water, and ecosystems. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1011/gri-304-biodiversity-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 304</a> addresses the topic of biodiversity. Protecting biological diversity is important for ensuring the survival of plant and animal species, genetic diversity, and natural ecosystems. In addition, natural ecosystems provide clean water and air, and contribute to food security and human health. Biodiversity also contributes directly to local livelihoods, making it essential for achieving poverty reduction, and thus sustainable development. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">These concepts are covered in key instruments of the United Nations. The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to biodiversity, and how it manages them.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this metric question you need identify the <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong>total number of IUCN Red List species and national conservation list species with habitats in areas affected by the operations of the organization</strong>, </span>for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">Relevant Definition: </span><em>IUCN Red List of Threatened Species - </em>An inventory of the global conservation status of plant and animal species developed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (<a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#68\" title=\"Reference number 68\" target=\"_blank\">68</a>). </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric: </span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>Biodiversity</li>\r\n<li>IUCN</li>\r\n<li>Red List</li>\r\n<li>Habitat</li>\r\n<li>GRI</li>\r\n<li>EN14</li>\r\n<li>304</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations: </span>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If any calculations or unit conversions are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> where you found the answer.</span> Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the organization reports information on <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">level of extinction risk </span>(i.e. Critically endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable, Near threatened, Least concern), please include in the comment field.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 304 - Biodiversity 2016",
        "GRI Standards+304-4 IUCN Red List species and national conservation list species with habitats in areas affected by operations",
        "GRI Standards+304-4-a IUCN Red List and nationally listed species with habitats in areas affected by the organization - total number and extinction risk level",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E4 - Biodiversity and Ecosystems",
        "ESRS Standards+E4.5 - Metrics related to biodiversity and ecosystems change"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 13,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 13,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Affected_IUCN_Red_List_and_Conservation_List_Species_GRI_304_4_a_formerly_G4_EN14+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1511385,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Hazardous Waste Handled, GRI 306-4-a (formerly G4-EN25-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Hazardous_Waste_Handled_GRI_306_4_a_formerly_G4_EN25_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Hazardous Waste Handled, GRI 306-4-a (formerly G4-EN25-a)",
      "question": "What is the companies' total weight (in metric tonnes) of transported, imported, exported, or treated waste deemed hazardous under the terms of the Basel Convention (2) Annex I, II, III, and VIII?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The full set can be downloaded at </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-EN23-a is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">code</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">306-4 <em>Transport of hazardous waste</em></span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Hazardous_Waste_Transport_G4_EN25_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 1rem;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water, and ecosystems.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090313\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 306</a> addresses the topic of <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">effluents and waste</span>. This includes water discharges; the generation, treatment and disposal of waste; and spills of chemicals, oils, fuels, and other substances.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The generation, treatment and disposal of waste – including its improper transportation – can pose harm to human health and the environment. This is of particular concern if waste is transported to countries lacking the infrastructure and regulations to handle it.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to effluents and waste, and how it manages these impacts.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question you need to identify the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">total hazardous waste handled (in tonnes)</span> by the organization <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> &amp; search terms: Hazardous,<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Waste,</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Handle, Transport, GRI, 306-4, EN25</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">calculations or conversions </span>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report the <em>volume</em> in thousands of cubic metres, or using a unit other than cubic meters. If this is the case, convert units to cubic meters (see website below), or add the number of zeros indicated, and fill in the total number in the answer field - e.g. If the company says '0.5 million tonnes' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500000'. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://convertunits.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Hazardous_Waste_Handled_GRI_306_4_a_formerly_G4_EN25_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1511460,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Nature of knowledge transfer (G4-EO12-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Nature_of_knowledge_transfer_G4_EO12_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Nature of knowledge transfer (G4-EO12-a)",
      "question": "Does the organization identify the content of knowledge transferred?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - </span><a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a><span>. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator EO12 - '</span><strong>Nature</strong> and extent <strong>of knowledge transfer of best practice, and lessons learned</strong>'.</p>\r\n<p>Throughout the project life cycle, an event organizer can learn from successes and failures. This learning can be transferred to future events and the wider industry to facilitate continual improvement. The transfer of this knowledge to other event organizers and other relevant sectors can add value to the industry.</p>\r\n<p>Transfer of knowledge is not exclusive to sustainability initiatives. Security, operations, transport management, construction and other technologies, sourcing, and standard creation are all examples of potential knowledge transfer areas.</p>\r\n<p>In order to maximize knowledge transfer, the information should be made available to the public and actively promoted and shared.</p>\r\n<p>Legacies can be those that are known, clearly defined and measured, and evident in the project life cycle, and future legacies that are yet to be defined, including initiatives with potential for a positive legacy.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>Indicate whether the organization identified the content of knowledge transferred</span><span> by choosing </span><strong>Yes</strong><span> or </span><strong>No</strong><span>.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>If provided, in the <strong>comments section</strong> include:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>specific lessons learned,</span></li>\r\n<li><span>initiatives implemented,</span></li>\r\n<li><span>standards created,</span></li>\r\n<li><span>or materials produced.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Nature_of_knowledge_transfer_G4_EO12_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1511498,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Hazardous Waste Shipped Internationally, GRI 306-4-b (formerly G4-EN25-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Hazardous_Waste_Shipped_Internationally_GRI_306_4_b_formerly_G4_EN25_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Hazardous Waste Shipped Internationally, GRI 306-4-b (formerly G4-EN25-b)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of transported waste, deemed hazardous under the terms of the Basel Convention (2) Annex I, II, III, and VIII, shipped internationally?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The full set can be downloaded at </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-EN23 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">code</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">306-4 <em>Transport of hazardous waste</em></span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Hazardous_Waste_Transport_G4_EN25_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 1rem;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water, and ecosystems.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090313\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 306</a> addresses the topic of <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">effluents and waste</span>. This includes water discharges; the generation, treatment and disposal of waste; and spills of chemicals, oils, fuels, and other substances.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The generation, treatment and disposal of waste – including its improper transportation – can pose harm to human health and the environment. This is of particular concern if waste is transported to countries lacking the infrastructure and regulations to handle it.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to effluents and waste, and how it manages these impacts.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question you need to identify the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">total hazardous waste shipped internationally (%)</span> by the organization <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> &amp; search terms: Hazardous,<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Waste, Ship</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, International, Transport, GRI, 306-4, EN25</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate (in this case Percentage %). If <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">calculations or conversions </span>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Hazardous_Waste_Shipped_Internationally_GRI_306_4_b_formerly_G4_EN25_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1511810,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Extent of knowledge transfer (G4-EO12-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Extent_of_knowledge_transfer_G4_EO12_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Extent of knowledge transfer (G4-EO12-b)",
      "question": "Does the organization identify the methods of knowledge transferred?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator EO12 - 'Nature and <strong>extent of knowledge transfer of best practice, and lessons learned</strong>'.</p>\r\n<p>Throughout the project life cycle, an event organizer can learn from successes and failures. This learning can be transferred to future events and the wider industry to facilitate continual improvement. The transfer of this knowledge to other event organizers and other relevant sectors can add value to the industry.</p>\r\n<p>Transfer of knowledge is not exclusive to sustainability initiatives. Security, operations, transport management, construction and other technologies, sourcing, and standard creation are all examples of potential knowledge transfer areas.</p>\r\n<p>In order to maximize knowledge transfer, the information should be made available to the public and actively promoted and shared.</p>\r\n<p>Legacies can be those that are known, clearly defined and measured, and evident in the project life cycle, and future legacies that are yet to be defined, including initiatives with potential for a positive legacy.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Indicate whether the organization identified the content of knowledge transferred by choosing <strong>Yes</strong> or <strong>No</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>If provided, in the <strong>comments section</strong> include the identified methods of knowledge transfer, including:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>workshops,</li>\r\n<li><span>documentation</span></li>\r\n<li><span>and other modes of sharing information.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Extent_of_knowledge_transfer_G4_EO12_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1521137,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Affected Water Bodies G4-EN26",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Affected_Water_Bodies_G4_EN26.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Affected Water Bodies G4-EN26",
      "question": "What is the total number of water bodies and related habitats significantly affected by the organization’s discharges of water and runoff?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator</span><span> </span><span>[[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/effluents-and-waste/Pages/G4-EN26.aspx|G4-EN26]]</span><span>​ - '</span>Identity, size, protected status, and biodiversity value of water bodies and related habitats significantly affected by the organization’s discharges of water and runoff.'</p>\r\n<p><span>This Indicator is a qualitative counterpart to quantitative Indicators of water discharge and helps to describe the impact of these discharges. Discharges and runoff affecting aquatic habitats can have a significant impact on the availability of water resources. Identifying water bodies affected by discharges provides an opportunity to identify activities in regions of significant concern, or areas where the organization may face specific risks such as community concerns and limited water resources.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the total number of water bodies and related habitats significantly affected by the organization’s discharges of water and runoff:</strong></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.</p><ul><li><p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL F, Command F or search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p></li><li><p>Use G4 codes, G3 codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. G4-EN26 or EN26, water discharge or water runoff</p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value</p></li><li><p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><strong>Global Reporting Initiative compliance guidance for companies:</strong></p><p>To calculate the total number of affect water bodies and related habitats - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/effluents-and-waste/Pages/G4-EN26.aspx|G4-EN26]]:</p><p>​Identify water bodies significantly affected by the organization’s water discharges that meet one or more of the following criteria:</p><ul><li><p>Discharges account for an average of 5% or more of the annual average volume of the water body</p></li><li><p>Discharges that, on the advice of appropriate professionals (such as municipal authorities), are known to have or are highly likely to have significant impacts on the water body and associated habitats</p></li><li><p>Discharges to water bodies that are recognized by professionals to be particularly sensitive due to their relative size, function, or status as a rare, threatened, or endangered system (or support a particular endangered species of plant or animal)</p></li><li><p>Any discharge to a wetland listed in the Ramsar Convention (<a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#78\" title=\"Reference number 78\">78</a>) or any other nationally or internationally proclaimed conservation area regardless of the rate of discharge</p></li><li><p>The water source has been identified as having high biodiversity value (such as species diversity and endemism, total number of protected species)</p></li><li><p>The water source has been identified as having a high value or importance to local communities</p></li></ul><p>Reporting on this Indicator should include the following contextual information as a comment to the metric value (per water body and related habitat):</p><ul><li><p>Size of water body and related habitat</p></li><li><p>Whether the water body and related habitat is designated as a protected area (nationally or internationally)</p></li><li><p>Biodiversity value (such as total number of protected species)</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "water bodies and habitats affected",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 11,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Affected_Water_Bodies_G4_EN26+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1521369,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Reclaimed Products (%), GRI 301-3 (formerly G4-EN28)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Reclaimed_Products_GRI_301_3_formerly_G4_EN28.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Reclaimed Products (%), GRI 301-3 (formerly G4-EN28)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of products and their packaging materials sold by the company that are reclaimed?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090310\">GRI 301</a> addresses the topic of materials. The inputs used to manufacture and package an organization’s products and services can be nonrenewable materials, such as minerals, metals, oil, gas, or coal; or renewable materials, such as wood or water. Both renewable and non-renewable materials can be composed of virgin or recycled input materials. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The type and amount of materials the organization uses can indicate its dependence on natural resources, and the impacts it has on their availability. The organization’s contribution to resource conservation can be indicated by its approach to recycling, reusing and reclaiming materials, products, and packaging. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to materials, and how it manages these impacts.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Reclaimed products</strong> - refers to collecting, reusing, or recycling products and their packaging materials at the end of their useful lives</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">G4-EN28 is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, and the</span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> new GRI 301-3 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Reclaimed_Products_G4_EN28_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the percentage of reclaimed products used by the organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Material</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Product</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Reclaimed</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Input material</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- 301-3</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Companies may report reclaimed products as a weight rather than a percentage. To calculate the percentage divide the <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">reclaimed product</span> weight by the total product weight and multiply by 100. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 301 - Materials",
        "GRI Standards+301-3 Reclaimed products and their packaging materials",
        "GRI Standards+301-3-a Percentage of products and packaging materials reclaimed, by product category"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 12,
      "companies": 31,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Reclaimed_Products_GRI_301_3_formerly_G4_EN28+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1521529,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Raise awareness (G4-EO11-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Raise_awareness_G4_EO11_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Raise awareness (G4-EO11-a)",
      "question": "How many initiatives and projects occurred in association with the event to raise awareness on sustainability?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - </span><a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a><span>. It covers the reporting requirements of Indicator G4-EO11 - '<strong>Number, type and impact of sustainability initiatives designed to raise awareness</strong>, share knowledge and impact behavior change, and results achieved'.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>Events are a highly effective platform to transfer knowledge </span><span>to stakeholders and can be an important way for advancing </span><span>sustainability, driving innovation and developing society. </span><span>These factors can be used to demonstrate the legacy impact of </span><span>the event. </span></p>\r\n<p><span></span><span>Events influence attendees, participants, guests, viewers and </span><span>others, and can be powerful tools for raising awareness and </span><span>changing behavior. Throughout the project life cycle, an event </span><span>organizer can implement sustainability policies and undertake </span><span>practices and initiatives that may leave a lasting impact, </span><span>transfer knowledge, and influence behavior change among </span><span>stakeholders. Events can also facilitate information sharing </span><span>among gathered attendees and participants, who can learn </span><span>not only from the event and the event’s sustainable operations </span><span>and content, but also from each other. Such learning and </span><span>information-sharing can be a tool for long term and lasting </span><span>behavioral, social, cultural, institutional, and technological </span><span>change.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>Given the nature and scale of events, event organizers have </span><span>both the responsibility and opportunity to communicate </span><span>sustainable development principles and influence enduring </span><span>behavioral change.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>Legacies can be those that are known, clearly defined and </span><span>measured, and evident in the project life cycle, and future </span><span>legacies that are yet to be defined, including initiatives with </span><span>potential for a positive legacy.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To calculate the number of initiatives and projects that occurred in association with the event to raise awareness on sustainability - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">G4-EO11</a>-a:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Report the number of initiatives and projects occurring in association with the event that have lasting social, environmental or economic impact. </span></li>\r\n<li><span>Include initiatives to integrate awareness-raising on sustainability into event content throughout the project life cycle. </span><span>This may include projects supported by event organizers or by independent third parties.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>If provided, in the <strong>comments section</strong> include details about the type of <span>initiatives and projects. </span></p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Initiatives & Projects",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Raise_awareness_G4_EO11_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1521746,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Share knowledge (G4-EO11-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Share_knowledge_G4_EO11_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Share knowledge (G4-EO11-b)",
      "question": "How many sustainability initiatives designed to share knowledge occurred in association with the event?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers the reporting requirements of Indicator G4-EO11 - '<strong>Number, type and impact of sustainability initiatives designed to</strong> raise awareness, <strong>share knowledge</strong> and impact behavior change, and results achieved'.</p>\r\n<p>Events are a highly effective platform to transfer knowledge to stakeholders and can be an important way for advancing sustainability, driving innovation and developing society. These factors can be used to demonstrate the legacy impact of the event. </p>\r\n<p>Events influence attendees, participants, guests, viewers and others, and can be powerful tools for raising awareness and changing behavior. Throughout the project life cycle, an event organizer can implement sustainability policies and undertake practices and initiatives that may leave a lasting impact, transfer knowledge, and influence behavior change among stakeholders. Events can also facilitate information sharing among gathered attendees and participants, who can learn not only from the event and the event’s sustainable operations and content, but also from each other. Such learning and information-sharing can be a tool for long term and lasting behavioral, social, cultural, institutional, and technological change.</p>\r\n<p>Given the nature and scale of events, event organizers have both the responsibility and opportunity to communicate sustainable development principles and influence enduring behavioral change.</p>\r\n<p>Legacies can be those that are known, clearly defined and measured, and evident in the project life cycle, and future legacies that are yet to be defined, including initiatives with potential for a positive legacy.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To calculate the number of sustainability initiatives designed to share knowledge - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">G4-EO11</a>-b:</p>\r\n<p><span>Report the number of activities to share or transfer </span><span>knowledge. For example:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Number of briefing sessions for suppliers;</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Development of standards and local guidelines to </span><span>improve the organization of an event, and/or to improve </span><span>other industries, with respect to sustainability</span><span> </span></li>\r\n<li><span>Webinars, conferences, seminars and workshops </span><span>organized pre-, during and post-event;</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Number and type of reports published;</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Platforms for information sharing between event </span><span>stakeholders; and</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Initiatives to include all populations in the event and the </span><span>provision of its products and services, in terms of legacy, </span><span>specifically targeted at disadvantaged populations.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>If provided, in the <strong>comments section</strong> include details about the type of initiatives. </p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Initiatives",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Share_knowledge_G4_EO11_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1521935,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Impact behavior change (G4-EO11-c)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Impact_behavior_change_G4_EO11_c.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Impact behavior change (G4-EO11-c)",
      "question": "Does the organization report the impact of initiatives that have lasting social, environmental or economic impact and that lead to enduring behavior change?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers the reporting requirements of Indicator G4-EO11 - '<strong>Number, type and impact of sustainability initiatives designed to </strong>raise awareness, share knowledge and <strong>impact behavior change</strong>, and results achieved'.</p>\r\n<p>Events are a highly effective platform to transfer knowledge to stakeholders and can be an important way for advancing sustainability, driving innovation and developing society. These factors can be used to demonstrate the legacy impact of the event. </p>\r\n<p>Events influence attendees, participants, guests, viewers and others, and can be powerful tools for raising awareness and changing behavior. Throughout the project life cycle, an event organizer can implement sustainability policies and undertake practices and initiatives that may leave a lasting impact, transfer knowledge, and influence behavior change among stakeholders. Events can also facilitate information sharing among gathered attendees and participants, who can learn not only from the event and the event’s sustainable operations and content, but also from each other. Such learning and information-sharing can be a tool for long term and lasting behavioral, social, cultural, institutional, and technological change.</p>\r\n<p>Given the nature and scale of events, event organizers have both the responsibility and opportunity to communicate sustainable development principles and influence enduring behavioral change.</p>\r\n<p>Legacies can be those that are known, clearly defined and measured, and evident in the project life cycle, and future legacies that are yet to be defined, including initiatives with potential for a positive legacy.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Indicate whether the organization <span>reports the impact of initiatives that have lasting social, environmental or economic impact and that lead to enduring behavior change</span><span> by choosing </span><strong>Yes</strong><span> or </span><strong>No</strong><span>.</span></p>\r\n<p>If provided, in the <strong>comments section</strong> include <span>the impact of initiatives that have lasting social, </span>environmental or economic impact and that lead to enduring behavior change, post-event and within set time lines. For example: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>change in transportation modes; </span></li>\r\n<li><span>change in waste recycling rates; </span></li>\r\n<li><span>energy conservation behavior change; </span></li>\r\n<li><span>adoption of sustainable sourcing practices; </span></li>\r\n<li><span>adoption of sustainable operating practices; </span></li>\r\n<li><span>attitude and behavior change on selected social issues, (e.g., accessibility); </span></li>\r\n<li><span>and enhancement of civic pride and cultural identity, through citizen or stakeholder surveys, media monitoring or citizen participation tracking, and the number of people impacted. </span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Impact_behavior_change_G4_EO11_c+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1522301,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Environmental Protection Expenditures (G4-EN31-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Protection_Expenditures_G4_EN31_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Environmental Protection Expenditures (G4-EN31-a)",
      "question": "What are the total environmental protection expenditures and investments of the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/overall/Pages/G4-EN31.aspx|G4-EN31]]​ - 'Total environmental protection expenditures and investments by type'</p><p>​Measuring environmental mitigation and protection expenditures allows organizations to assess the efficiency of their environmental initiatives. It also provides valuable input for internal cost-benefit analyses. Data on environmental performance measured against environmental mitigation and protection expenditures offers insights into how effectively the organization uses resources to improve performance. When tracked and analyzed in a comprehensive fashion over time, this expenditures data allows the organization to judge the value of complex organizational or technological investments for improving environmental performance.</p><p>It is possible to establish a full environmental management accounting system within an organization that tracks multiple categories of information. This Indicator focuses on waste disposal, emissions treatment, and remediation costs, as well as prevention and environmental management costs.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is asking for the total environmental protection expenditures and investments of the company in US dollars:</strong></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.</p><ul><li><p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL F, Command F or search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p></li><li><p>Use G4 codes, G3 codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. G4-EN31 or EN31, environmental protection expenditures or environmental protection investments</p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value</p></li><li><p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><strong>Global Reporting Initiative compliance guidance for companies:</strong></p><p>To calculate the total environmental protection expenditures - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/overall/Pages/G4-EN31.aspx|G4-EN31]]​:</p><p>​Identify waste disposal, emissions treatment, and remediation costs based on expenditures which include, as a minimum:</p><ul><li><p>Treatment and disposal of waste</p></li><li><p>Treatment of emissions (such as expenditures for filters, agents)</p></li><li><p>Expenditures for the purchase and use of emissions certificates</p></li><li><p>Expenditure on equipment, maintenance, and operating materials and services, and related personnel costs</p></li><li><p>Insurance for environmental liability</p></li><li><p>Clean-up costs, including costs for remediation of spills as reported in [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/effluents-and-waste/Pages/G4-EN24.aspx|G4-EN24]]</p></li></ul><p>Identify prevention and environmental management costs based on expenditures which include, as a minimum:</p><ul><li><p>Environmental education and training</p></li><li><p>External services for environmental management</p></li><li><p>External certification of management systems</p></li><li><p>Research and development</p></li><li><p>Extra expenditures to install cleaner technologies (such as additional cost beyond standard technologies)</p></li><li><p>Extra expenditures on green purchases</p></li><li><p>Other environmental management costs</p></li></ul><p>The compilation of the expenditures in this Indicator exclude the following categories as defined in the IFAC <em>International Guidance Document on Environmental Management Accounting</em> ([[https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/references/Pages/default.aspx#21|21]]):</p><ul><li><p>Fines for non-compliance with environmental regulation (see [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/compliance/Pages/G4-EN29.aspx|G4-EN29]])</p></li></ul><p>Reporting on this Indicator should include the following contextual information as a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>​The total environmental protection expenditures by:</p><ul><li><p>Waste disposal, emissions treatment, and remediation costs</p></li><li><p>Prevention and environmental management costs</p></li></ul></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 304 - Biodiversity 2016",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13: Climate Action",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13.a Mobilize $100 billion annually for climate action and fully operationalize the Green Climate Fund.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG14 - Life Below Water",
        "UN SDGs+SDG15: Life on Land",
        "UN SDGs+SDG15.a Mobilize financial resources to conserve and sustainably use biodiversity and ecosystems.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG17 - Partnerships for the Goals"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2808,
      "bookmarkers": 24,
      "datasets": 68,
      "companies": 1001,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Environmental_Protection_as_of_revenue.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Higher_School_of_Economics_Research_Group_2020+From_Farm_to_Fork_2020_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Protection_Expenditures_G4_EN31_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1522541,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Physical and technological legacies (G4-EO13-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Physical_and_technological_legacies_G4_EO13_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Physical and technological legacies (G4-EO13-a)",
      "question": "Does the organization identify physical and technological legacies?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - </span><a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a><span>. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator EO13 - '<strong>Number, type and impact of physical and technological legacies</strong>'.</span></p>\r\n<p>Legacy can be the most significant part of an event’s organizing process.</p>\r\n<p>Physical legacies may include infrastructure constructed for the event, improvements to community infrastructure, and environmental protection or enhancements. Technological legacies include increased technological capabilities, capacity, infrastructure and innovation that will last beyond the project life cycle.</p>\r\n<p>Legacies may include lasting impacts on physical infrastructure, and new implemented technologies in the region, the local community and wider society. Legacies may also include new financial mechanisms and funds, particularly those devoted to managing legacy infrastructure.</p>\r\n<p>Legacies can be those that are known, clearly defined and measured, and evident in the project life cycle, and future legacies that are yet to be defined, including initiatives with potential for positive legacy.</p>\r\n<p>It may be relevant to report on baseline measurements to understand legacy impact.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>I<span>ndicate whether the organization identified</span><span> physical and technological legacies</span><span> by choosing </span><strong>Yes</strong><span> or </span><strong>No</strong><span>.</span></p>\r\n<p>If provided, in the <strong>comments section</strong> include details of the identified physical and technological legacies<span> that are </span><span>known, clearly defined and evident in the life cycle of the </span><span>event, and the legacy potential of future and anticipated </span><span>legacy, such as:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Infrastructure constructed for the event by event </span><span>organizers and partners, including buildings, </span><span>transportation systems, and telecommunications, and </span><span>plans for future use;</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Transfer of operations and new operating entities, </span><span>anticipated impacts of organizer’s initiatives on costs of </span><span>operations and maintenance; </span></li>\r\n<li><span>New technologies and innovations designed, </span><span>implemented, or scaled; </span></li>\r\n<li><span>Future plans to replicate or scale these technologies; </span></li>\r\n<li><span>Donation of physical and technological assets and inkind </span><span>contributions; and </span></li>\r\n<li><span>Physical and technological environmental and/or </span><span>community enhancement initiatives that improve </span><span>conditions during or after the project life cycle. This may </span><span>include natural areas created or protected, clean-up </span><span>initiatives, and improved community facilities such as </span><span>schools, parks and public spaces.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 13,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Physical_and_technological_legacies_G4_EO13_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1522663,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Environmental Impacts Grievances Filed G4-EN34-a",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Impacts_Grievances_Filed_G4_EN34_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Environmental Impacts Grievances Filed G4-EN34-a",
      "question": "What is the total number of grievances about environmental impacts filed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/environmental-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-EN34.aspx|G4-EN34]]​ - 'Number of grievances about environmental impacts <strong>filed</strong>, addressed, and resolved through formal grievance mechanisms'</p>\r\n<p>​Disputes may occur over the environmental impacts of an organization’s activities and relationships with others (such as entities in the supply chain). Effective grievance mechanisms play an important role in remediating environmental impacts. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>To calculate the total number of environmental impacts grievances filed - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/environmental-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-EN34.aspx|G4-EN34]]-a</span><span>​:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span></span><span>Identify existing formal grievance mechanisms. Formal grievance mechanisms may be managed by the reporting organization or by an external party. </span></li>\r\n<li><span></span><span>Identify the total number of grievances about environmental impacts filed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period. </span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Reporting on this Indicator should include the following contextual information as a comment to the metric value:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>​<span>If it will provide appropriate context on significant impacts, organizations are encouraged to break down the number of grievances by the nature and location of the grievance, and the party that filed the grievance. Parties that filed the grievance may include:</span>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Internal stakeholders (such as employees)</li>\r\n<li>External stakeholders (such as suppliers, local communities)</li>\r\n<li>Individuals or groups of people identified by:</li>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Membership of underrepresented social groups</li>\r\n<li>Other indicators of diversity</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 17,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 17,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Impacts_Grievances_Filed_G4_EN34_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1522697,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Indirect legacy (G4-EO13-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Indirect_legacy_G4_EO13_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Indirect legacy (G4-EO13-b)",
      "question": "Does the organization identify indirect legacy benefits?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator EO13 - '<strong>Number, type and impact of physical and technological legacies</strong>'.</p>\r\n<p>Legacy can be the most significant part of an event’s organizing process.</p>\r\n<p>Physical legacies may include infrastructure constructed for the event, improvements to community infrastructure, and environmental protection or enhancements. Technological legacies include increased technological capabilities, capacity, infrastructure and innovation that will last beyond the project life cycle.</p>\r\n<p>Legacies may include lasting impacts on physical infrastructure, and new implemented technologies in the region, the local community and wider society. Legacies may also include new financial mechanisms and funds, particularly those devoted to managing legacy infrastructure.</p>\r\n<p>Legacies can be those that are known, clearly defined and measured, and evident in the project life cycle, and future legacies that are yet to be defined, including initiatives with potential for positive legacy.</p>\r\n<p>It may be relevant to report on baseline measurements to understand legacy impact.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Indicate whether the organization identified indirect legacy benefits by choosing <strong>Yes</strong> or <strong>No</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>If provided, in the <strong>comments section</strong> include details Identify indirect legacy benefits, like:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Increased tourism facilities and service capacity in the </span>region, and increased tourism to the region after the event. Identify future sources to track increased tourism after the event and the impacts of that tourism; and</li>\r\n<li>Sourcing policies that take into consideration the legacy benefits of donations.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Indirect_legacy_G4_EO13_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1522732,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Environmental Impacts Grievances Addressed G4-EN34-b",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Impacts_Grievances_Addressed_G4_EN34_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Environmental Impacts Grievances Addressed G4-EN34-b",
      "question": "What is the total number of grievances about environmental impacts addressed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/environmental-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-EN34.aspx|G4-EN34]]​ - 'Number of grievances about environmental impacts filed, <strong>addressed</strong>, and resolved through formal grievance mechanisms'</p>\r\n<p>​Disputes may occur over the environmental impacts of an organization’s activities and relationships with others (such as entities in the supply chain). Effective grievance mechanisms play an important role in remediating environmental impacts. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>To calculate the total number of environmental impacts grievances addressed - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/environmental-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-EN34.aspx|G4-EN34]]-b1</span><span>​:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Identify existing formal grievance mechanisms. Formal grievance mechanisms may be managed by the reporting organization or by an external party. </span></li>\r\n<li><span>Identify the total number of grievances addressed during the reporting period from both current year and prior year grievance filings.</span><span> </span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Reporting on this Indicator should include the following contextual information as a comment to the metric value:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>​If it will provide appropriate context on significant impacts, organizations are encouraged to break down the number of grievances by the nature and location of the grievance, and the party that filed the grievance. Parties that filed the grievance may include:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Internal stakeholders (such as employees)</li>\r\n<li>External stakeholders (such as suppliers, local communities)</li>\r\n<li>Individuals or groups of people identified by:</li>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Membership of underrepresented social groups</li>\r\n<li>Other indicators of diversity</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Impacts_Grievances_Addressed_G4_EN34_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1522764,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Environmental Impacts Grievances Resolved G4-EN34-b",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Impacts_Grievances_Resolved_G4_EN34_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Environmental Impacts Grievances Resolved G4-EN34-b",
      "question": "What is the total number of grievances about environmental impacts resolved through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/environmental-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-EN34.aspx|G4-EN34]]​ - 'Number of grievances about environmental impacts filed, addressed, and <strong>resolved</strong> through formal grievance mechanisms'</p>\r\n<p>​Disputes may occur over the environmental impacts of an organization’s activities and relationships with others (such as entities in the supply chain). Effective grievance mechanisms play an important role in remediating environmental impacts. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>To calculate the total number of environmental impacts grievances resolved - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/environmental-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-EN34.aspx|G4-EN34]]-b2</span><span>​:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Identify existing formal grievance mechanisms. Formal grievance mechanisms may be managed by the reporting organization or by an external party. </li>\r\n<li>Identify the total number of grievances resolved during the reporting period from the current year filings. </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Reporting on this Indicator should include the following contextual information as a comment to the metric value:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>​If it will provide appropriate context on significant impacts, organizations are encouraged to break down the number of grievances by the nature and location of the grievance, and the party that filed the grievance. Parties that filed the grievance may include:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Internal stakeholders (such as employees)</li>\r\n<li>External stakeholders (such as suppliers, local communities)</li>\r\n<li>Individuals or groups of people identified by:</li>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Membership of underrepresented social groups</li>\r\n<li>Other indicators of diversity</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Impacts_Grievances_Resolved_G4_EN34_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1522799,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Prior Environmental Impacts Grievances Resolved G4-EN34-c",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Prior_Environmental_Impacts_Grievances_Resolved_G4_EN34_c.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Prior Environmental Impacts Grievances Resolved G4-EN34-c",
      "question": "What is the total number of grievances about environmental impacts filed through formal grievance mechanisms prior to the reporting period that were resolved during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator</span><span> </span><span>[[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/environmental-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-EN34.aspx|G4-EN34]]</span><span>​ - '</span>Number of grievances about environmental impacts filed, addressed, and <strong>resolved</strong> through formal grievance mechanisms<span>'</span></p>\r\n<p><span>​Disputes may occur over the environmental impacts of an organization’s activities and relationships with others (such as entities in the supply chain). Effective grievance mechanisms play an important role in remediating environmental impacts. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>To calculate the total number of prior environmental impacts grievances resolved - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/environmental-grievance-mechanisms/Pages/G4-EN34.aspx|G4-EN34]]-c</span><span>​:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Identify existing formal grievance mechanisms. Formal grievance mechanisms may be managed by the reporting organization or by an external party. </li>\r\n<li>Identify the total number of grievances resolved during the reporting period from prior year grievance filings. </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Reporting on this Indicator should include the following contextual information as a comment to the metric value:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>​If it will provide appropriate context on significant impacts, organizations are encouraged to break down the number of grievances by the nature and location of the grievance, and the party that filed the grievance. Parties that filed the grievance may include:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Internal stakeholders (such as employees)</li>\r\n<li>External stakeholders (such as suppliers, local communities)</li>\r\n<li>Individuals or groups of people identified by:</li>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Membership of underrepresented social groups</li>\r\n<li>Other indicators of diversity</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Prior_Environmental_Impacts_Grievances_Resolved_G4_EN34_c+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1523012,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Energy consumption outside the organization, GRI 302-2 (formerly G4-EN4)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Energy_consumption_outside_the_organization_GRI_302_2_formerly_G4_EN4.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Energy consumption outside the organization, GRI 302-2 (formerly G4-EN4)",
      "question": "What is the total amount of energy consumption outside of the organization in gigajoules?\r\n \r\n ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090311\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 302</a> addresses the topic of energy. An organization can consume energy in various forms, such as fuel, electricity, heating, cooling or steam. Energy can be self-generated or purchased from external sources and it can come from renewable sources (such as wind, hydro or solar) or from non-renewable sources (such as coal, petroleum or natural gas).</p>\r\n<p>Using energy more efficiently and opting for renewable energy sources is essential for combating climate change and for lowering an organization’s overall environmental footprint. The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to energy, and how it manages them.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Energy consumption can occur outside an organization</strong>, i.e. throughout the organization’s upstream and downstream activities associated with its operations. This can include consumers’ use of products the organization sells, and the end-of-life treatment of products.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">G4-EN4 is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, and the new </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">GRI 302-2 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Energy_Consumption_Outside_the_Organization_G4_EN4_methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the total energy consumption outside of the organization for a specific year. Companies that report according to GRI guidelines will often use the GRI code 302 or 302-2 and will follow GRI guidance for determining the relevant energy consumption outside of the organization.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Search publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports to find the answer. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric: </span>Energy, Fuel, 302-2, GRI, GRI Index</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Companies may report energy consumption in hundreds, thousands or millions of gigajoules or joules. <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">The answer for this metric must be entered into Wikirate in gigajoules (GJ)</span>. Make sure you check the unit of measurement and do any conversions necessary. Enter the full number into the answer field.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">E.g. If the company reports its consumption as '5 million megajoules (MJ)' the answer should be converted to gigajoules (GJ) and entered on Wikirate as '5000 GJ'</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Gigajoules",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 302 - Energy",
        "GRI Standards+302-2 Energy consumption outside of the organization",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG7 - Affordable and Clean Energy",
        "UN SDGs+SDG7.2 Substantially increase the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.4 Improve global resource efficiency and decouple economic growth from environmental degradation.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.2 Achieve sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13: Climate Action",
        "UN SDGs+SDG13.2 Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 941,
      "bookmarkers": 11,
      "datasets": 24,
      "companies": 381,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Wollongong_Research_Group_2020+Wollongong_2020_Climate_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Energy_consumption_outside_the_organization_GRI_302_2_formerly_G4_EN4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1523702,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Direct economic impacts (G4-EO1-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Direct_economic_impacts_G4_EO1_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Direct economic impacts (G4-EO1-a)",
      "question": "Does the organization report the direct economic impacts achieved through sustainability initiatives?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - </span><a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a><span>. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator EO1 - '<strong>Direct economic impacts</strong> and value creation <strong>as a result of sustainability initiatives</strong>'.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>Sustainability initiatives can have a positive and negative </span><span>economic impact on an organization. They also have the </span><span>potential to create additional economic value. </span></p>\r\n<p><span></span><span>The financial implications of sustainability initiatives are of </span><span>interest for many event stakeholders. The business case for </span><span>sustainability initiatives includes returns on investment such </span><span>as resource cost savings, increased brand value, competitive </span><span>advantage and additional revenues. Budgetary savings can </span><span>result from resource conservation, reduced consumption or </span><span>reductions in waste volumes, resulting in direct benefits for </span><span>the event and the organization’s financial performance. Value </span><span>creation can be offered to sponsors, organizers, and other </span><span>stakeholders through innovative sustainability communication </span><span>programs.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>Performance in this Indicator may further support the business </span><span>case for embedding sustainability initiatives into ongoing </span><span>event production and business practice.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>Indirect economic impact and value created for the </span><span>community or other stakeholders is a positive outcome to be </span><span>reported with </span><span>{{G4_EC8 | link; title:G4-EC8}}</span><span>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>Indicate whether the organization </span><span>reports on the direct economic impacts achieved through sustainability initiatives </span><span>by choosing </span><strong>Yes</strong><span> or </span><strong>No</strong><span>.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>If provided, in the <strong>comments section</strong> include details of the</span> direct economic impacts on the reporting organization achieved through sustainability initiatives, for example: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Energy conservation programs;  </span></li>\r\n<li><span>Water conservation programs;  </span></li>\r\n<li><span>Responsible printing practices;  </span></li>\r\n<li><span>Waste management initiatives;  </span></li>\r\n<li><span>Community engagement programs;  </span></li>\r\n<li><span>Safety and security programs;  </span></li>\r\n<li><span>Sustainable and or responsible sourcing initiatives and solutions.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Potential sources of data may include tender documentation, cost estimates for business as usual scenarios, quotes, invoices and reports from suppliers including for environmental services and security, sponsor and media reports.</p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Direct_economic_impacts_G4_EO1_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1536819,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Value creation (G4-EO1-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Value_creation_G4_EO1_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Value creation (G4-EO1-b)",
      "question": "Does the organization report on value creation as a result of sustainability initiatives?\r\n ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator EO1 - 'Direct economic impacts and <strong>value creation</strong> <strong>as a result of sustainability initiatives</strong>'.</p>\r\n<p>Sustainability initiatives can have a positive and negative economic impact on an organization. They also have the potential to create additional economic value. </p>\r\n<p>The financial implications of sustainability initiatives are of interest for many event stakeholders. The business case for sustainability initiatives includes returns on investment such as resource cost savings, increased brand value, competitive advantage and additional revenues. Budgetary savings can result from resource conservation, reduced consumption or reductions in waste volumes, resulting in direct benefits for the event and the organization’s financial performance. Value creation can be offered to sponsors, organizers, and other stakeholders through innovative sustainability communication programs.</p>\r\n<p>Performance in this Indicator may further support the business case for embedding sustainability initiatives into ongoing event production and business practice.</p>\r\n<p>Indirect economic impact and value created for the community or other stakeholders is a positive outcome to be reported with {{G4_EC8 | link; title:G4-EC8}}.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Indicate whether the organization reports value creation <span>achieved through sustainability initiatives by choosing </span><strong>Yes</strong><span> or </span><strong>No</strong><span>.</span></p>\r\n<p><strong><span>Value creation</span></strong><span> in these Sector Disclosures refers to a</span><span>dditional or increased benefit delivered by an organization’s </span><span>activities, including brand value and employee satisfaction, </span><span>among others.</span></p>\r\n<p>If provided, in the <strong>comments section</strong> include details of the <span>value creation for the reporting organization, for </span><span>example:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Increased amount and scale of sponsorship;</span></li>\r\n<li><span></span><span>Increased media reach and impact;</span></li>\r\n<li><span></span><span>Enhanced brand value; or</span></li>\r\n<li><span></span><span>Product and service innovation.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Potential sources of data may include tender documentation, cost estimates for business as usual scenarios, quotes, invoices and reports from suppliers including for environmental services and security, sponsor and media reports.</p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Value_creation_G4_EO1_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1540839,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Expressions of dissent (G4-EO4)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Expressions_of_dissent_G4_EO4.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Expressions of dissent (G4-EO4)",
      "question": "Does the organization report on expressions of dissent by type, issue, scale and response?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers the reporting requirements of Indicator G4-EO4 - '<strong>Expressions of dissent by type, issue, scale and response</strong>'. </p>\r\n<p>All organizations, particularly those organizing events, have stakeholders with a desire to give feedback which may take the form of an expression of dissent. Managing the process of stakeholder engagement throughout the entire event planning and execution process can have a significant impact on the type and scale of stakeholder dissent.</p>\r\n<p>This Indicator allows organizations to demonstrate the ability to self-correct programs and policies based on stakeholder feedback, and to disclose their mechanisms to accept positive and negative feedback. It also allows organizations to report on expressions of dissent throughout the project life cycle, and how proactive measures have reduced the scale of such expressions or planned for freedom, safety and security of expression.</p>\r\n<p>Refer to Standard Disclosure {{G4-27 | link; title:G4-27}} for reporting concerns raised through stakeholder engagement related to general activities and operations.</p>\r\n<p>Refer to the sector specific Guidance for DMA for the Customer Health and Safety Aspect for reporting on crowd control.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Indicate whether the organization reports any expressions of dissent by type, issue, scale and response by choosing <strong>Yes</strong>, <strong>Partially</strong> or <strong>No</strong>.</p>\r\n<p><span>If provided, in the <strong>comments section</strong> include information on the following aspects:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Identify <strong>efforts to track</strong> dissent expressed over time, by </span><span>monitoring or sharing stakeholder evaluation of the event </span><span>before and after.</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Identify <strong>types</strong> of expressions of dissent throughout the </span><span>project cycle, and organizational responses.</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Report on the <strong>scale of action taken</strong> to express dissent </span><span>by type, issue, and stakeholder group, including but not </span><span>limited to physical protests, rallies, marches, petitions </span><span>submitted, and public commentary.</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Report all relevant initiatives for <strong>stakeholder engagement</strong>, </span><span>including public feedback periods during the bid or </span><span>proposal phase, during planning periods, or before, </span><span>during and after the event.</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Report <strong>proactive measures to manage risks</strong>, address stakeholder concerns, and respond to issues and dissent. For example, include reference to any public comment periods, organizational changes based on feedback, and the creation of any public contact point for expressions of dissent such as an ombudsman.</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Report <strong>responses by external parties</strong> (such as civil society groups, government or external security forces) to expressions of dissent to the event, including any efforts to proactively prepare and integrate these external parties.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Expressions_of_dissent_G4_EO4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1564890,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Injuries, fatalities and notifiable incidents (G4-EO7)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Injuries_fatalities_and_notifiable_incidents_G4_EO7.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Injuries, fatalities and notifiable incidents (G4-EO7)",
      "question": "How many injuries, fatalities and notifiable incidents were reported by attendees and other relevant stakeholders during the event?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - </span><a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a><span>. It covers the reporting requirements of Indicator G4-EO7 - '<strong>Number and type of injuries, fatalities and notifiable incidents for attendees, and other relevant stakeholders</strong>'.</span></p>\r\n<p>The number of injuries and fatalities during an event are a useful indicator to determine health and safety practices for all relevant stakeholders. While the event organizer may not be responsible for all such incidents, reporting on them allows for transparency and opportunities for continual improvement.</p>\r\n<p>Injuries, fatalities and notifiable incidents for employees, volunteers and contractors are not reported on under this Indicator.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>To report the number and type of injuries, fatalities and notifiable incidents for attendees, and other relevant stakeholders</span><span> - </span><a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">G4-EO7</a><span>:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Report<strong> total number</strong> of injuries, fatalities and notifiable incidents by attendees and other relevant stakeholders (e.g., service providers, local community).</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>Attendees</strong><span> in these Sector Disclosures, refers to people who are present at an event, including delegates, customers, clients, audience, fans, spectators, or others present at the event.</span></p>\r\n<p><strong><span>Event related injury </span></strong><span>in these Sector Disclosures, refers to </span><span>a non-fatal or fatal injury arising from or in the course of an event.</span></p>\r\n<p><span><strong>Event related fatality</strong> in these Sector Disclosures, refers to </span><span>the death of an attendee, participant or other relevant stakeholder arising from an event-related injury sustained while at the event.</span></p>\r\n<p><strong><span>Notifiable incident </span></strong><span>in these Sector Disclosures, refers to </span><span>a fatality or injury that is required to be reported by law to the regulator or as a matter of policy.</span></p>\r\n<p><span><span>If provided, in the </span><strong>comments section</strong><span> include:</span></span><span><br></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>the <strong>type</strong> of injuries, fatalities and notifiable incidents by attendees and other relevant stakeholders.</span></li>\r\n<li>a <strong>description</strong> of each accident resulting in a fatality and actions taken following the accident. These may be aggregated where the cause of accidents or the actions taken are similar.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Potential information sources include the reporting organization’s event management team, medical teams, health and safety team, legal team, research and development departments, as well as documentation collected through quality management systems.</p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "injuries, fatalities and notifiable incidents",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Injuries_fatalities_and_notifiable_incidents_G4_EO7+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1573825,
      "name": "Richard Mills+Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Slavery_and_Human_Trafficking_Statement.json",
      "designer": "Richard Mills",
      "title": "Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement",
      "question": "Does the company publish a statement about the steps they are taking to ensure that slavery and human trafficking are not taking place in the business (or its supply chains)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The [[http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/30/contents/enacted|Modern Slavery Act 2015]] requires companies that trade in the UK with a turnover of £36 Million or greater to publish a statement on their website detailing the steps they are taking to ensure that slavery and human trafficking are not taking place in the business (or its supply chains).</p>\r\n<p>This metric is being used to research whether relevant companies have published such a statement on their website. Collecting these statements is the first step in a project to investigate what companies are doing to combat slavery - the next step will be to analyse the content of these statements.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>As companies are directed to publish these statements \"on their own website\" there is no single repository where these statements can be accessed (this metric will serve as such a repository).</p>\r\n<p>The [[https://business-humanrights.org/en/registry-of-slavery-human-trafficking-statements-under-uk-modern-slavery-act?page=9|Business &amp; Human Rights Resource Centre]] are maintaining a list of the statements that they're aware of - this is a great resource and should probably be the starting-point to check if the company you're researching has published a statement.</p>\r\n<p>Other than this, the best method I have found for sourcing statements thus far is simply to search for \"[Company name] modern slavery statement\".</p>\r\n<p>If you come up with additional ways to locate these statements please leave a comment or edit this methodology section directly.</p>\r\n<p>If you can't find this kind of statement for a company, set the value to \"No\" with a \"Report\" source describing the steps you took to try and find the statement. Set the \"year\" for this value as the previous year (the company may still release a statement that covers the current year).</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Slavery_and_Human_Trafficking_Statement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1603109,
      "name": "UN Global Compact+UNGC Status",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/UN_Global_Compact+UNGC_Status.json",
      "designer": "UN Global Compact",
      "title": "UNGC Status",
      "question": "What is the company's participation status in UN Global Compact Initiative?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Company's Participation Status in <a href=\"https://www.unglobalcompact.org/\">UN Global Compact</a> initiative.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><a href=\"https://www.unglobalcompact.org/participation/report/cop\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.unglobalcompact.org/participation/report/cop</a></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Active",
        "Delisted",
        "Non-Communicating",
        "Not Listed"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3079,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 1967,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+UNGC_Status.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/UN_Global_Compact+UNGC_Status+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1614051,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Financial value of benefits (G4-EO10-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Financial_value_of_benefits_G4_EO10_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Financial value of benefits (G4-EO10-b)",
      "question": "How much (in US Dollars) did the organization receive in benefits, financial and in kind from suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers the reporting requirements of Indicator G4-EO9 - 'Type, <strong>amount</strong> and impact<strong> of benefits, financial and in kind, received by the event organizer from suppliers</strong>'. </p>\r\n<p>In the event industry, the event organizer may receive financial commissions, in kind products and services and other benefit from the supply chain. Transparent reporting in this area is relevant for stakeholders to understand how sourcing decisions could be influenced.</p>\r\n<p>Financial and in kind benefits can be part of regular business practice, but significant benefits or patterns of the provision of benefits can signal an excessive level of supplier influence.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Report the <strong>total value</strong> of benefits, financial and in kind, received by the event organizer from suppliers.</p>\r\n<p>A <strong>b</strong><strong>enefit</strong><strong> </strong>in these Sector Disclosures, refers to a gain that improves or promotes wellbeing or provides an advantage. In this Indicator, may include for example a gratuity, gift, commission or sole supplier deal.</p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Financial_value_of_benefits_G4_EO10_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1614069,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Impact of benefits (G4-EO10-c)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Impact_of_benefits_G4_EO10_c.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Impact of benefits (G4-EO10-c)",
      "question": "Does the organization report the impacts of benefits, financial and in kind, received by the event organizer from suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers the reporting requirements of Indicator G4-EO9 - 'Type, amount and <strong>impact of benefits, financial and in kind, received by the event organizer from suppliers</strong>'. </p>\r\n<p>In the event industry, the event organizer may receive financial commissions, in kind products and services and other benefit from the supply chain. Transparent reporting in this area is relevant for stakeholders to understand how sourcing decisions could be influenced.</p>\r\n<p>Financial and in kind benefits can be part of regular business practice, but significant benefits or patterns of the provision of benefits can signal an excessive level of supplier influence.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>Indicate whether the organization reports on the impacts of benefits, financial and in kind, received by the event organizer from suppliers</span><span> by choosing <strong>Yes</strong> or <strong>No</strong>.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>A <strong>b</strong></span><strong>enefit</strong><strong> </strong><span>in these Sector Disclosures, refers to </span><span>a gain that improves or promotes wellbeing or provides an advantage. In this Indicator, may include for example a gratuity, gift, commission or sole supplier deal.</span></p>\r\n<p><span>If provided, in the </span><strong>comments section</strong><span> include details about the impacts.</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see [[Researching_GRI_Metrics | this page]] for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Impact_of_benefits_G4_EO10_c+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1614489,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Food and beverage (G4-EO8-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Food_and_beverage_G4_EO8_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Food and beverage (G4-EO8-a)",
      "question": "What percentage of food and beverage offered references national and/or international standards?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator EO8 - '<strong>Percentage of</strong> and access to <strong>food and beverage that meets the organizer's policies or local, national or international standards</strong>'.</p>\r\n<p>Food and beverage is a critical aspect of the attendee and participant experience of an event. Through the provision of food and beverage, event organizers have an opportunity to clearly demonstrate their commitment to sustainability.</p>\r\n<p>Report on environmental impacts of food and beverage packaging, consumables and tableware under Indicators {{G4-EN23 | link; title:G4-EN23}} and {{G4-EN28 | link; title:G4-EN28}}.</p>\r\n<p>Report on attendee and participant satisfaction with provision of food and beverage under Indicator {{G4-PR5 | link; title:G4-PR5}}.</p>\r\n<p>Report on sourcing of food and beverage (as opposed to attendee and participant experience) under the Sourcing category.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To report the percentage of food and beverage offered references national and/or international standards - {{EO8 | link; title:EO8}}-a:</p>\r\n<p>Identify the organizers’ policies and definitions on food and beverages regarding their commitment to sustainability, with reference to national or international standards. For example: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Vegetarian, meat, fish; </li>\r\n<li>Local; Organic; </li>\r\n<li>Seasonal; </li>\r\n<li>Cultural and religious needs; </li>\r\n<li>Dietary and nutritional needs; and </li>\r\n<li>Certified under recognized standards.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Then report the percentages of food and beverage offered that reference national and/or international standards as identified above.</p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "1-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Food_and_beverage_G4_EO8_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1614502,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Access to drinking water (G4-EO8-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Access_to_drinking_water_G4_EO8_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Access to drinking water (G4-EO8-b)",
      "question": "Does the organization report access to drinking water by source (bottled, potable, etc.)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator EO8 - 'Percentage of and <strong>access to food and beverage that meets the organizer's policies or local, national or international standards</strong>'.</p>\r\n<p>Food and beverage is a critical aspect of the attendee and participant experience of an event. Through the provision of food and beverage, event organizers have an opportunity to clearly demonstrate their commitment to sustainability.</p>\r\n<p>Report on environmental impacts of food and beverage packaging, consumables and tableware under Indicators {{G4-EN23 | link; title:G4-EN23}} and {{G4-EN28 | link; title:G4-EN28}}.</p>\r\n<p>Report on attendee and participant satisfaction with provision of food and beverage under Indicator {{G4-PR5 | link; title:G4-PR5}}.</p>\r\n<p>Report on sourcing of food and beverage (as opposed to attendee and participant experience) under the Sourcing category.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>Indicate whether the organization reports access to drinking water by source </span><span>by choosing </span><strong>Yes</strong><span> or </span><strong>No</strong><span>. </span></p>\r\n<p><span>If provided, in the </span><strong>comments section</strong><span> include a list of sources, for example, </span><span>bottled, potable, etc.</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Access_to_drinking_water_G4_EO8_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1614520,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Health, safety and security (G4-EO8-c)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Health_safety_and_security_G4_EO8_c.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Health, safety and security (G4-EO8-c)",
      "question": "Does the organization report systems used to guarantee health, safety and security of food and beverage provision?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator EO8 - 'Percentage of and <strong>access to food and beverage that meets the organizer's policies or local, national or international standards</strong>'.</p>\r\n<p>Food and beverage is a critical aspect of the attendee and participant experience of an event. Through the provision of food and beverage, event organizers have an opportunity to clearly demonstrate their commitment to sustainability.</p>\r\n<p>Report on environmental impacts of food and beverage packaging, consumables and tableware under Indicators {{G4-EN23 | link; title:G4-EN23}} and {{G4-EN28 | link; title:G4-EN28}}.</p>\r\n<p>Report on attendee and participant satisfaction with provision of food and beverage under Indicator {{G4-PR5 | link; title:G4-PR5}}.</p>\r\n<p>Report on sourcing of food and beverage (as opposed to attendee and participant experience) under the Sourcing category.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>Indicate whether the organization reports systems used to guarantee health, safety and security of food and beverage provision by choosing </span><strong>Yes</strong><span> or </span><strong>No</strong><span>. </span></p>\r\n<p><span>If provided, in the </span><strong>comments section</strong><span> include detials of the</span> systems used to guarantee health, safety and security of food and beverage provision.</p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Health_safety_and_security_G4_EO8_c+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1615221,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Communication and information (G4-EO8-d)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Communication_and_information_G4_EO8_d.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Communication and information (G4-EO8-d)",
      "question": "Does the organization report communication and information and labeling strategies to ensure participants and attendees are aware of food and beverage options?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sector Supplement - <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-G4-Event-Organizers-Sector-Disclosures.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Event Organizers</a>. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator EO8 - 'Percentage of and <strong>access to food and beverage that meets the organizer's policies or local, national or international standards</strong>'.</p>\r\n<p>Food and beverage is a critical aspect of the attendee and participant experience of an event. Through the provision of food and beverage, event organizers have an opportunity to clearly demonstrate their commitment to sustainability.</p>\r\n<p>Report on environmental impacts of food and beverage packaging, consumables and tableware under Indicators {{G4-EN23 | link; title:G4-EN23}} and {{G4-EN28 | link; title:G4-EN28}}.</p>\r\n<p>Report on attendee and participant satisfaction with provision of food and beverage under Indicator {{G4-PR5 | link; title:G4-PR5}}.</p>\r\n<p>Report on sourcing of food and beverage (as opposed to attendee and participant experience) under the Sourcing category.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Indicate whether the organization reports <span>communication and information and labeling strategies to ensure participants and attendees are aware of food and beverage options</span> by choosing <strong>Yes</strong> or <strong>No</strong>. </p>\r\n<p>If provided, in the <strong>comments section</strong> include details about the communication and information and labeling <span>strategies </span><span>that ensure participants and attendees are aware </span><span>of food and beverage options as identified in </span>{{EO8 | link; title:EO8}}-a.</p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate Researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Please see <a href=\"/Researching_GRI_Metrics\">this page</a> for guidelines on how to research values for GRI-based metrics.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Communication_and_information_G4_EO8_d+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1617975,
      "name": "UN Global Compact+UNGC Participant Since",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/UN_Global_Compact+UNGC_Participant_Since.json",
      "designer": "UN Global Compact",
      "title": "UNGC Participant Since",
      "question": "When the company joined UN Global Compact initiative?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Date when the company joined <a href=\"http://unglobalcompact.org/\">UN Global Compact</a> initiative</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><a href=\"https://www.unglobalcompact.org/participation/report/cop\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.unglobalcompact.org/participation/report/cop</a></p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1984,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 1959,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/UN_Global_Compact+UNGC_Participant_Since+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1625721,
      "name": "WWF+Palm Oil Scorecard Countries",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/WWF+Palm_Oil_Scorecard_Countries.json",
      "designer": "WWF",
      "title": "Palm Oil Scorecard Countries",
      "question": "In which country is the company headquarters located?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies worldwide can and should be using 100% sustainable palm oil, as certified by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO).</p>\r\n<p>The 2013 Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard assesses the performance of 130 major retailers, food service companies and consumer goods and other manufacturers worldwide on their use of certified sustainable palm oil (CSPO).</p>\r\n<p>This year’s Scorecard – the third WWF has produced – features companies from Europe, Australia, Japan, the US and India.</p>\r\n<p>Source: [[http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/footprint/agriculture/palm_oil/solutions/responsible_purchasing/palm_oil_buyers_scorecard_2013/| WWF website]]</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>This metric indicates where the headquarters the company in question are located.</strong></p>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div> </div>\r\n<div><em>Why did WWF choose to score these companies in particular?</em></div>\r\n<div> </div>\r\n<div><span></span><span>WWF chose to score companies based on their importance either in terms of the total volume of palm oil they use, their role and influence in the supply chain or because of their relevance in national markets where WWF works.</span>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div> </div>\r\n<div> </div>\r\n<div><em>Why did WWF include India and the US alongside Europe and Australia this time? </em> </div>\r\n<div> </div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div><span>Consumption in these countries is increasing rapidly. Between 2009 and 2013, India’s palm oil use has rocketed from 6 to 9 million tonnes. Palm oil consumption in the US has also passed the 1 million tonne mark in the same period. These changes reflect the growing importance of Asian countries, companies and consumers in the palm oil sector – but also their growing potential to be part of the solution to the challenges facing the industry. It also shows the role that US-based companies, and in particular multinationals, will increasingly have in driving transformation. </span><span>At the same time, Europe remains the strongest market for CSPO. It’s more important than ever for European companies to create demand for change in the industry. </span></div>\r\n<div> </div>\r\n<div>Source: [[file:///C:/Users/Laureen/Downloads/po_scorecard_2013_latest.pdf| WWF - Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard Report]]</div>\r\n<div> </div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": "<p>In the attached Palm Oil Manufacturers or Retailers Scorecard, locate the company you wish to assess and check in which country their headquarters can be found.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Australia",
        "USA",
        "Japan",
        "India",
        "EU - Sweden",
        "EU - Germany",
        "EU - UK",
        "EU - Switzerland",
        "EU - Belgium",
        "EU - Denmark",
        "EU - Netherlands",
        "EU - Finland",
        "EU - France",
        "EU - Italy",
        "EU - Norway"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 16,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/WWF+Palm_Oil_Scorecard_Countries+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1626040,
      "name": "WWF+GHG sourcing policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/WWF+GHG_sourcing_policy.json",
      "designer": "WWF",
      "title": "GHG sourcing policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on the Greenhouse Gas emissions of the palm oil they source?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies worldwide can and should be using 100% sustainable palm oil, as certified by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO).</p>\r\n<p>The 2013 Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard assesses the performance of 130 major retailers, food service companies and consumer goods and other manufacturers worldwide on their use of certified sustainable palm oil (CSPO).</p>\r\n<p>This year’s Scorecard – the third WWF has produced – features companies from Europe, Australia, Japan, the US and India. </p>\r\n<p>Source: [[http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/footprint/agriculture/palm_oil/solutions/responsible_purchasing/palm_oil_buyers_scorecard_2013/| WWF website]]</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>This metric indicates whether the company in question has a policy in place on the Greenhouse Gas emissions of the palm oil that they source.</strong></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Since its launch in 2007, the RSPO standard has required existing estates and mills to report and reduce their GHG emissions. As of 2013, new developments have to be planned in ways that minimize their emissions – including by avoiding highcarbon areas like forests and peatlands and by building mills that eliminate methane emissions. Although these are welcome moves, the RSPO standard doesn’t set specific targets or thresholds for emissions from land-use change – and the RSPO does not even yet require public reporting of emissions.</p>\r\n<p>WWF would like to see progressive growers make such climate commitments and report on them. However growers will only be encouraged to go the extra mile if there is a clear market demand for “low-carbon” palm oil. That’s why, for the first time, this Scorecard asks retailers and manufacturers about their GHG policies. </p>\r\n<p>Source: [[file:///C:/Users/Laureen/Downloads/po_scorecard_2013_latest.pdf| WWF - Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard Report]]</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>In the attached Palm Oil Manufactures or Retailers Scorecard,</span><span> locate the company you wish to assess and check whether they have a policy on the Greenhouse Gas emissions produced by the palm oil they source.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Specific_Project_Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 15,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 15,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/WWF+GHG_sourcing_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1626060,
      "name": "WWF+Palm Oil Annual Communication of Progress",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/WWF+Palm_Oil_Annual_Communication_of_Progress.json",
      "designer": "WWF",
      "title": "Palm Oil Annual Communication of Progress",
      "question": "Has the company submitted its 2013 Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP) to the RSPO?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies worldwide can and should be using 100% sustainable palm oil, as certified by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO).</p>\r\n<p><span>The 2013 Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard assesses the performance of 130 major retailers, food service companies and consumer goods and other manufacturers worldwide on their use of certified sustainable palm oil (CSPO).</span></p>\r\n<p><span>This year’s Scorecard – the third WWF has produced – features companies from Europe, Australia, Japan, the US and India. </span></p>\r\n<p><span>Source: [[http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/footprint/agriculture/palm_oil/solutions/responsible_purchasing/palm_oil_buyers_scorecard_2013/| WWF website]]</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>This metric indicates whether the company in question has submitted an Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP) to the RSPO.</strong></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div><span>WWF values transparency and has scored on the basis of publicly disclosed information (either to the RSPO via the ACOP or directly to WWF). In some<br> cases, companies provided different answers to WWF than they did in their ACOP submissions to the RSPO. In such cases we have endeavoured to use the ACOP data, as the information is in the public domain. </span></div>\r\n<div> </div>\r\n<div><span><span>Source: [[file:///C:/Users/Laureen/Downloads/po_scorecard_2013_latest.pdf| WWF - Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard Report]]</span></span></div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>There are 5 categories for ACOP:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li><strong>Yes</strong>: Company submitted an ACOP.</li>\r\n<li><strong>No</strong>: Company didn't.</li>\r\n<li><strong>Previous</strong>: Company hasn’t submitted an ACOP to the RSPO this year but has done in previous years.</li>\r\n<li><strong>No requirement</strong>: Company has been a member of the RSPO for less than a year so isn’t required to submit an ACOP.</li>\r\n<li><strong>N/A</strong>: Data is not available because the company has not reported to WWF or the RSPO</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p>In the attached Palm Oil Manufacturers or Retailers Scorecard, locate the company you wish to report on and determine which of the 5 above categories applies. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Previous",
        "No requirement",
        "N/A",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 15,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 15,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/WWF+Palm_Oil_Annual_Communication_of_Progress+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1626079,
      "name": "WWF+Volume of Palm Oil Used",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/WWF+Volume_of_Palm_Oil_Used.json",
      "designer": "WWF",
      "title": "Volume of Palm Oil Used",
      "question": "What is total volume (in tonnes) of palm oil that is used/bought by the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies worldwide can and should be using 100% sustainable palm oil, as certified by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO).</p>\r\n<p>The 2013 Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard assesses the performance of 130 major retailers, food service companies and consumer goods and other manufacturers worldwide on their use of certified sustainable palm oil (CSPO).</p>\r\n<p>This year’s Scorecard – the third WWF has produced – features companies from Europe, Australia, Japan, the US and India. </p>\r\n<p>Source: [[http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/footprint/agriculture/palm_oil/solutions/responsible_purchasing/palm_oil_buyers_scorecard_2013/| WWF website]]</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>This metric indicates the total volume (in tonnes) of Palm Oil used/bought/sold by the company in question.</strong></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Palm oil is the most widely used vegetable oil on Earth, and demand continues to grow rapidly. It’s an important ingredient in countless products. It’s also a major part of the economy in the tropical areas where it’s grown, helping to lift people out of poverty. Oil palm is highly productive, capable of producing more oil on less land than any other crop.</p>\r\n<p>But it has a serious downside. Clearing land for palm oil plantations has led to widespread loss of rainforests in Indonesia, Malaysia and beyond. This has destroyed habitat for endangered species like rhinos, elephants, tigers and orang-utans, and robbed indigenous people of their land and livelihoods. It also fuels climate change.</p>\r\n<p>By disclosing how much Palm Oil they use, it becomes clear how far along companies are on their way to sustainable supply chains.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <span>[[file:///C:/Users/Laureen/Downloads/po_scorecard_2013_latest.pdf| WWF - Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard Report]]</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span></span><span>In the attached Palm Oil Buyers or Retailers Scorecard</span><span>, locate the company you wish to assess and check what the total volume (in tonnes) is of palm oil used/bought/sold by the company.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Specific_Project_Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 18,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/WWF+Volume_of_Palm_Oil_Used+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1626089,
      "name": "WWF+Commitment to 100% CSPO",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/WWF+Commitment_to_100_CSPO.json",
      "designer": "WWF",
      "title": "Commitment to 100% CSPO",
      "question": "By which year does the company commit to sourcing 100% CSPO?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies worldwide can and should be using 100% sustainable palm oil, as certified by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO).</p>\r\n<p>The 2013 Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard assesses the performance of 130 major retailers, food service companies and consumer goods and other manufacturers worldwide on their use of certified sustainable palm oil (CSPO). [[http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/footprint/agriculture/palm_oil/solutions/responsible_purchasing/palm_oil_buyers_scorecard_2013/| Source]]</p>\r\n<p><strong>This metric indicates whether the company in question has committed to purchasing only sustainable palm oil by a specific year, or whether they have not.</strong></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Does it have a public commitment to use 100% CSPO by 2015 or sooner? To answer this metric, the cateogries of commitment are:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li><span>Stated by <strong>Year</strong> of commitment by company</span></li>\r\n<li><span></span><strong>N/A</strong>: Data is not available because the company has not reported to WWF or the RSPO</li>\r\n<li><strong>Dash (-)</strong>: Company did report but left that question blank</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p>In the attached Palm Oil Manufacturers or Retailers Scorecard, locate the company you wish to assess and check what which of the above values applies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 18,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/WWF+Commitment_to_100_CSPO+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1626100,
      "name": "WWF+Volume of CSPO used",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/WWF+Volume_of_CSPO_used.json",
      "designer": "WWF",
      "title": "Volume of CSPO used",
      "question": "What is total volume (in tonnes) of CSPO that is used/bought by the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies worldwide can and should be using 100% sustainable palm oil, as certified by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO).</p>\r\n<p>The 2013 Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard assesses the performance of 130 major retailers, food service companies and consumer goods and other manufacturers worldwide on their use of certified sustainable palm oil (CSPO).</p>\r\n<p>This year’s Scorecard – the third WWF has produced – features companies from Europe, Australia, Japan, the US and India. </p>\r\n<p>Source: [[http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/footprint/agriculture/palm_oil/solutions/responsible_purchasing/palm_oil_buyers_scorecard_2013/| WWF website]]</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>This metric indicates the total volume (in tonnes) of CSPO used/bought/sold by the company in question.</strong></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>WWF wants to see sustainable palm oil become a commodity in its own right – so that it can be traded in sustainable supply chains separate from the trade in conventional palm oil. Over a longer period, as markets like Europe and the US reach 100 per cent CSPO and demand grows in Asia, we would like to see the trade in non-certified palm oil dwindling and stopping.</p>\r\n<p>To achieve this sustainable palm oil trade, we need to see whole supply chains and associated refineries and processing plants shifting to using only CSPO – so that everything they produce is derived solely from CSPO. In other words, we want to see the “physical” supply chain options growing – and that means all users of palm oil need to work hard with their suppliers and customers to push for faster progress.</p>\r\n<p>Source: [[file:///C:/Users/Laureen/Downloads/po_scorecard_2013_latest.pdf| WWF - Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard Report]]</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>In the attached Palm Oil Buyers or Retailers Scorecard,</span><span> locate the company you wish to assess and check what the total volume is (in tonnes) of CSPO used/bought/sold by the company.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Specific_Project_Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 18,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/WWF+Volume_of_CSPO_used+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1626125,
      "name": "WWF+% CSPO Used",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/WWF+CSPO_Used.json",
      "designer": "WWF",
      "title": "% CSPO Used",
      "question": "What proportion (%) of the company’s total palm oil use/sales were CSPO, irrespective of which supply chain option they use?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies worldwide can and should be using 100% sustainable palm oil, as certified by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO).</p>\r\n<p>The 2013 Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard assesses the performance of 130 major retailers, food service companies and consumer goods and other manufacturers worldwide on their use of certified sustainable palm oil (CSPO).</p>\r\n<p>This year’s Scorecard – the third WWF has produced – features companies from Europe, Australia, Japan, the US and India. </p>\r\n<p>Source: [[http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/footprint/agriculture/palm_oil/solutions/responsible_purchasing/palm_oil_buyers_scorecard_2013/| WWF website]]</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>This metric indicates what the proportion of CSPO is out of the companies total Palm Oil use/sales.</strong></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>WWF wants to see sustainable palm oil become a commodity in its own right – so that it can be traded in sustainable supply chains separate from the trade in conventional palm oil. Over a longer period, as markets like Europe and the US reach 100 per cent CSPO and demand grows in Asia, we would like to see the trade in non-certified palm oil dwindling and stopping.</p>\r\n<p>To achieve this sustainable palm oil trade, we need to see whole supply chains and associated refineries and processing plants shifting to using only CSPO – so that everything they produce is derived solely from CSPO. In other words, we want to see the “physical” supply chain options growing – and that means all users of palm oil need to work hard with their suppliers and customers to push for faster progress.</p>\r\n<p><span>Source: [[file:///C:/Users/Laureen/Downloads/po_scorecard_2013_latest.pdf| WWF - Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard Report]]</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>In the attached Palm Oil Buyers or Retailers Scorecard, locate the company you wish to assess and check what the proportion (%) is of CSPO used/bought/sold by the company.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Specific_Project_Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 18,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/WWF+CSPO_Used+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1626274,
      "name": "WWF+Total Palm Oil Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/WWF+Total_Palm_Oil_Score.json",
      "designer": "WWF",
      "title": "Total Palm Oil Score",
      "question": "What is the total palm oil score of the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies worldwide can and should be using 100% sustainable palm oil, as certified by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO).</p>\r\n<p>The 2013 Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard assesses the performance of 130 major retailers, food service companies and consumer goods and other manufacturers worldwide on their use of certified sustainable palm oil (CSPO).</p>\r\n<p>This year’s Scorecard – the third WWF has produced – features companies from Europe, Australia, Japan, the US and India. </p>\r\n<p>Source: [[http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/footprint/agriculture/palm_oil/solutions/responsible_purchasing/palm_oil_buyers_scorecard_2013/| WWF website]]</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>This metric indicates what the companies' total Palm Oil Score is out of 12.</strong></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>This year (2013), WWF assessed companies on their commitment to CSPO, how much CSPO they use, whether they disclose their palm oil use, whether they are members of the RSPO and if they have a policy on reducing GHG emissions in their supply chain. How did WWF assess the companies in the Scorecard?</p>\r\n<p>They evaluated companies’ performance in relation to the following six questions:</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<table>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n</td>\r\n<td>\r\n<p>Score</p>\r\n</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>\r\n<p>Is the company a member of the RSPO?</p>\r\n</td>\r\n<td>\r\n<p>   1</p>\r\n</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>\r\n<p>Has the company submitted its 2013 Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP) to the RSPO?</p>\r\n</td>\r\n<td>\r\n<p>   1</p>\r\n</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>\r\n<p>Does the company have a policy on sustainable palm oil – specifically a commitment to source 100 per cent RSPO-certified palm oil by 2015 or earlier?</p>\r\n</td>\r\n<td>\r\n<p>   1</p>\r\n</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>\r\n<p>Does the company have a policy on reducing GHG emissions in their supply chain?</p>\r\n</td>\r\n<td>\r\n<p>   1</p>\r\n</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>\r\n<p>Is the company disclosing total volumes of palm oil and/or CSPO used/bought?</p>\r\n</td>\r\n<td>\r\n<p>   2</p>\r\n</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>\r\n<p>What proportion of the company’s total palm oil use/sales were CSPO in 2012-2013, irrespective of which supply chain option they use?</p>\r\n</td>\r\n<td>\r\n<p>   6</p>\r\n</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>\r\n<p><strong>Maximum overall score</strong></p>\r\n</td>\r\n<td>\r\n<p><strong>  12</strong></p>\r\n</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> <span>Source: </span><span>[[file:///C:/Users/Laureen/Downloads/po_scorecard_2013_latest.pdf| WWF - Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard Report]]</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>In the attached Palm Oil Manufacturers or Retailers Scorecard, </span><span>locate the company you wish to assess and check what its total Palm Oil Score is.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Specific_Project_Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-12",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 18,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/WWF+Total_Palm_Oil_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1654026,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Half a Billion Dollars Challenge Pledge",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Half_a_Billion_Dollars_Challenge_Pledge.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Half a Billion Dollars Challenge Pledge",
      "question": "Has the company taken the GSC Half a Billion Dollars Challenge pledge?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric indicates which companies are taking part in the GSC Half-Billion Dollars Challenge and have decided to take an active role in the advancement of the different SDGs. The Global Sourcing Council has initiated this challenge in support of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. The SDGs are estimated to cost US$3 trillion per year to achieve, and much of this will need to come from resources from the private sector. Long-term investments are needed in sustainable energy, infrastructure, transport, and information and communications technologies, among other sectors. Showcasing company leadership to support and promote the SDGs sets an example for businesses worldwide.</p><p>The aim of this challenge is as such to compile tools, resources, case studies, and examples of business leadership on each of the 17 SDGs. It will thus serve as a roadmap for companies and investors wondering how their work is aligned with the SDGs, how they can contribute in a meaningful way, and how to measure their impacts.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge.</p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge.</p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG.</p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of <strong>organizations that have taken the pledge</strong> and check if the company in question is listed.</p></li></ul><p></p><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:</p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Half_a_Billion_Dollars_Challenge_Pledge+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1655689,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Index+Human Rights Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Index+Human_Rights_Policy.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Index",
      "title": "Human Rights Policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on Human Rights?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Human Rights are important indicator for responsible business practice.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To find whether the company has a policy on Human Rights, go through their Annual Report or CSR report using Control (F).</p>\r\n<p>Search words that might be helpful are:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span> policy</span></li>\r\n<li><span>human rights</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Index+Human_Rights_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1655711,
      "name": "InfluenceMap+Performance Band",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/InfluenceMap+Performance_Band.json",
      "designer": "InfluenceMap",
      "title": "Performance Band",
      "question": "What is the company's performance band based on InfluenceMap?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The InfluenceMap performance band is a measure of the influence the organization may have on climate policy based on InfluenceMap's method.</p>\r\n<p>For each corporation, the organizational score and the relationship score are combined to compute an overall rating, placing the corporation in a performance band. There are 20 performance bands from A+ (representing a total score from 95-100%) through to E- (a score of 25-30%), with scores below 25% falling in the red \"F\" band. A score of 60% or more indicates that the corporation is actively supporting policies and regulations towards a low-carbon future. Conversely, scores lower than 40% indicate obstructing behavior. As different sectors face differing regulatory issues, it is most useful to compare the performance bands of corporations within the same sector.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>http://influencemap.org/page/Our-Methodology</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [
        "\"A+\"",
        "\"A\"",
        "\"A-\"",
        "\"B+\"",
        "\"B\"",
        "\"B-\"",
        "\"C+\"",
        "\"C\"",
        "\"C-\"",
        "\"D+\"",
        "\"D\"",
        "\"D-\"",
        "\"E+\"",
        "\"E\"",
        "\"E-\"",
        "\"F\""
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/InfluenceMap+Performance_Band+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1657165,
      "name": "InfluenceMap+Organisation Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/InfluenceMap+Organisation_Score.json",
      "designer": "InfluenceMap",
      "title": "Organisation Score",
      "question": "What is the company's organisation score based on InfluenceMap?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The organizational score represents the degree to which the organization is directly influencing climate policy and legislation (through its political messaging and engagement with policymakers). It is expressed as a percentage, with 100% representing very supportive influence over climate policy. Organizational scores are computed for both corporations and influencers (e.g. trade bodies, chambers of commerce, advocacy groups, etc.) in exactly the same manner.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The InfluenceMap Scoring System</p>\r\n<p>To measure and score corporate influence on climate change policy, <a href=\"http://influencemap.org\">InfluenceMap</a> have developed a comprehensive process of examining publicly available information through reliable data sources (e.g. legislative consultations, respected press, CDP responses). This information is then used to test a set of queries across data sources for each organization (e.g. position on a carbon tax, energy efficiency standards, etc.).<br><br>They score each data cell (data source/query intersection) on a 5-point scale, consistently providing evidence to support their scores. There are 96 such scoring cells in each matrix, and the organization’s (either a corporation or an influencer) organizational score is computed using their proprietary algorithm, which accounts for different cell weightings and irrelevant data sources/queries. The organizational score represents the degree to which the organization is directly influencing climate policy and legislation (through its political messaging and engagement with policymakers). It is expressed as a percentage, with 100% representing very supportive influence over climate policy. Organizational scores are computed for both corporations and influencers (e.g. trade bodies, chambers of commerce, advocacy groups, etc.) in exactly the same manner.<br><br>In addition, a corporation will have a relationship score, computed by aggregating the organizational scores of the influencers with which it has relationships, and weighted by both the strength of these relationships and the relative importance of their influencers in the climate change policy arena. This score is also represented as a percentage, on the same scale as the organizational scores. For each corporation, the organizational score and the relationship score are combined to compute an overall rating, placing the corporation in a performance band. There are 20 performance bands from A+ (representing a total score from 95-100%) through to E- (a score of 25-30%), with scores below 25% falling in the red \"F\" band. A score of 60% or more indicates that the corporation is actively supporting policies and regulations towards a low-carbon future. Conversely, scores lower than 40% indicate obstructing behavior. As different sectors face differing regulatory issues, it is most useful to compare the performance bands of corporations within the same sector.</p>\r\n<p>http://influencemap.org/page/Our-Methodology</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/InfluenceMap+Organisation_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1657861,
      "name": "InfluenceMap+Relationship Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/InfluenceMap+Relationship_Score.json",
      "designer": "InfluenceMap",
      "title": "Relationship Score",
      "question": "What is the company's Relationship score based on InflurenceMap?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>A corporation will have a relationship score, computed by aggregating the organizational scores of the influencers with which it has relationships, and weighted by both the strength of these relationships and the relative importance of their influencers in the climate change policy arena.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The InfluenceMap Scoring System</p>\r\n<p>To measure and score corporate influence on climate change policy, <a href=\"http://influencemap.org\">InfluenceMap</a> have developed a comprehensive process of examining publicly available information through reliable data sources (e.g. legislative consultations, respected press, CDP responses). This information is then used to test a set of queries across data sources for each organization (e.g. position on a carbon tax, energy efficiency standards, etc.).<br><br>They score each data cell (data source/query intersection) on a 5-point scale, consistently providing evidence to support their scores. There are 96 such scoring cells in each matrix, and the organization’s (either a corporation or an influencer) organizational score is computed using their proprietary algorithm, which accounts for different cell weightings and irrelevant data sources/queries. The organizational score represents the degree to which the organization is directly influencing climate policy and legislation (through its political messaging and engagement with policymakers). It is expressed as a percentage, with 100% representing very supportive influence over climate policy. Organizational scores are computed for both corporations and influencers (e.g. trade bodies, chambers of commerce, advocacy groups, etc.) in exactly the same manner.<br><br>In addition, a corporation will have a relationship score, computed by aggregating the organizational scores of the influencers with which it has relationships, and weighted by both the strength of these relationships and the relative importance of their influencers in the climate change policy arena. This score is also represented as a percentage, on the same scale as the organizational scores. For each corporation, the organizational score and the relationship score are combined to compute an overall rating, placing the corporation in a performance band. There are 20 performance bands from A+ (representing a total score from 95-100%) through to E- (a score of 25-30%), with scores below 25% falling in the red \"F\" band. A score of 60% or more indicates that the corporation is actively supporting policies and regulations towards a low-carbon future. Conversely, scores lower than 40% indicate obstructing behavior. As different sectors face differing regulatory issues, it is most useful to compare the performance bands of corporations within the same sector.</p>\r\n<p><a href=\"http://influencemap.org/page/Our-Methodology\">http://influencemap.org/page/Our-Methodology</a></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": " %",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/InfluenceMap+Relationship_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1658328,
      "name": "InfluenceMap+Engagement Intensity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/InfluenceMap+Engagement_Intensity.json",
      "designer": "InfluenceMap",
      "title": "Engagement Intensity",
      "question": "What is the company's Engagement Intensity based on InfluenceMap?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The <strong>engagement intensity</strong> is a metric of the extent to which the company is engaging on climate change policy matters, whether positively or negatively. It is a number from 0 (no engagement at all) to 100 (full engagement on all queries/data points. Clearly energy and energy intensive users more affected by climate regulations will have a higher engagement intensity than, for example retailers. So an organization’s score should be looked at in conjunction with this metric to understand the amount of evidence we are using in each case to base our score on.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The InfluenceMap Scoring System</p><p>To measure and score corporate influence on climate change policy, <a href=\"http://influencemap.org\">InfluenceMap</a> have developed a comprehensive process of examining publicly available information through reliable data sources (e.g. legislative consultations, respected press, CDP responses). This information is then used to test a set of queries across data sources for each organization (e.g. position on a carbon tax, energy efficiency standards, etc.).<br><br>They score each data cell (data source/query intersection) on a 5-point scale, consistently providing evidence to support their scores. There are 96 such scoring cells in each matrix, and the organization’s (either a corporation or an influencer) organizational score is computed using their proprietary algorithm, which accounts for different cell weightings and irrelevant data sources/queries. The organizational score represents the degree to which the organization is directly influencing climate policy and legislation (through its political messaging and engagement with policymakers). It is expressed as a percentage, with 100% representing very supportive influence over climate policy. Organizational scores are computed for both corporations and influencers (e.g. trade bodies, chambers of commerce, advocacy groups, etc.) in exactly the same manner.<br><br>In addition, a corporation will have a relationship score, computed by aggregating the organizational scores of the influencers with which it has relationships, and weighted by both the strength of these relationships and the relative importance of their influencers in the climate change policy arena. This score is also represented as a percentage, on the same scale as the organizational scores. For each corporation, the organizational score and the relationship score are combined to compute an overall rating, placing the corporation in a performance band. There are 20 performance bands from A+ (representing a total score from 95-100%) through to E- (a score of 25-30%), with scores below 25% falling in the red \"F\" band. A score of 60% or more indicates that the corporation is actively supporting policies and regulations towards a low-carbon future. Conversely, scores lower than 40% indicate obstructing behavior. As different sectors face differing regulatory issues, it is most useful to compare the performance bands of corporations within the same sector.</p><p><a href=\"http://influencemap.org/page/Our-Methodology\">http://influencemap.org/page/Our-Methodology</a></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 90,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 89,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/InfluenceMap+Engagement_Intensity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1795218,
      "name": "Edidiong Uwemakpan+Responsible Mining",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Edidiong_Uwemakpan+Responsible_Mining.json",
      "designer": "Edidiong Uwemakpan",
      "title": "Responsible Mining",
      "question": "Does the company publish data that shows it gets it's gems ethically?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate_Social_Responsibility_Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Edidiong_Uwemakpan+Responsible_Mining+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1795244,
      "name": "Edidiong Uwemakpan+Kimberley Process Certification Scheme",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Edidiong_Uwemakpan+Kimberley_Process_Certification_Scheme.json",
      "designer": "Edidiong Uwemakpan",
      "title": "Kimberley Process Certification Scheme",
      "question": "Are their diamonds certified as non-conflict through the Kimberley Process?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Kimberley Process (KP) is a joint governments, industry and civil society initiative to stem the flow of conflict diamonds – rough diamonds used by rebel movements to finance wars against legitimate governments.</p><p>The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) imposes extensive requirements (*) on its members to enable them to certify shipments of rough diamonds as ‘conflict-free' and prevent conflict diamonds from entering the legitimate trade. Under the terms of the KPCS, participating states must meet ‘minimum requirements' and must put in place national legislation and institutions; export, import and internal controls; and also commit to transparency and the exchange of statistical data. Participants can only legally trade with other participants who have also met the minimum requirements of the scheme, and international shipments of rough diamonds must be accompanied by a KP certificate guaranteeing that they are conflict-free.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To add a new value to this metric, simply search the internet for \"Company name\" - Kimberley Process Certification Scheme.</p><p>Companies whose diamonds have been certified by this scheme would usually have it published.</p><p></p><p>If you find a document confirming that a company's diamonds has been certified by this scheme, input the value \"Yes\" citing the source and the year it was published. You can also leave a comment indicating where exactly on the publication this information can be found.</p><p></p><p>If a publication, report or text on the company's site does not confirm this, then it either does not use diamonds or the diamonds it uses have not been Kimberley -Certified.</p><p>If it does use diamonds and it is not Kimberley-Certified, input the value \"No\", citing the source and date of research.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Edidiong_Uwemakpan+Kimberley_Process_Certification_Scheme+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1795275,
      "name": "Edidiong Uwemakpan+Kimberely Process Certification Scheme",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Edidiong_Uwemakpan+Kimberely_Process_Certification_Scheme.json",
      "designer": "Edidiong Uwemakpan",
      "title": "Kimberely Process Certification Scheme",
      "question": "Are their sourced from non- conflict diamond sources, and Kimberley certified?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Edidiong_Uwemakpan+Kimberely_Process_Certification_Scheme+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1798257,
      "name": "Dina Seyer+Distributing leftover food",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Dina_Seyer+Distributing_leftover_food.json",
      "designer": "Dina Seyer",
      "title": "Distributing leftover food",
      "question": "Does the company distribute the unsold food of the days instead of throwing it away?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Dina_Seyer+Distributing_leftover_food+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1798266,
      "name": "Dina Seyer+Distribute Leftover Food",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Dina_Seyer+Distribute_Leftover_Food.json",
      "designer": "Dina Seyer",
      "title": "Distribute Leftover Food",
      "question": "Does the company distribute the unsold food of the day to individuals instead of throwing it away?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate_Social_Responsibility_Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Dina_Seyer+Distribute_Leftover_Food+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1798313,
      "name": "Dina Seyer+Partnering with charities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Dina_Seyer+Partnering_with_charities.json",
      "designer": "Dina Seyer",
      "title": "Partnering with charities",
      "question": "Does the company partner with charities to make leftover food available to individuals in need?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Dina_Seyer+Partnering_with_charities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1809949,
      "name": "Theresa Rabing+Recycling Leftover Food",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Theresa_Rabing+Recycling_Leftover_Food.json",
      "designer": "Theresa Rabing",
      "title": "Recycling Leftover Food",
      "question": "Does the company recycle the leftover food correctly?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Theresa_Rabing+Recycling_Leftover_Food+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1821705,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Water Volume Recycled (G4-EN10-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Water_Volume_Recycled_G4_EN10_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Water Volume Recycled (G4-EN10-a)",
      "question": "What volume of the water used by the company was recycled or reused (in cubic metres)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the reporting requirements of Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/water/Pages/G4-EN10.aspx|G4-EN10]] – 'Percentage and<strong> total volume of water recycled and reused</strong>'. This metric is for recording the total volume of water recycled and reused.</p><p>​This Indicator measures both water that was treated prior to reuse and water that was not treated prior to reuse. Grey water (that is, collected rainwater and wastewater generated by household processes such as washing dishes, laundry, and bathing) is included.<br><br>The rate of water reuse and recycling is a measure of efficiency and demonstrates the success of the organization in reducing total water withdrawals and discharges. Increased reuse and recycling may result in a reduction of water consumption, treatment, and disposal costs. The reduction of water consumption over time through reuse and recycling may also contribute to local, national, or regional goals for managing water supplies.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is asking for the total volume of water recycled by the company in cubic metres</strong>:</p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Companies who align reports to GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Standards often include a GRI Content Index or Annex where GRI disclosures, with GRI codes, are listed.</p><ul><li><p>Use the GRI Index, CTRL F, Command F or search button on source preview to search for this index and metrics within the report</p></li><li><p>Use G4 codes, G3 codes or keywords to quickly find values, keeping in mind that some companies report on the metric using different terms, e.g. G4-EN10 or EN10, water recycled or water volume recycled</p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value</p></li><li><p>If you are unable to locate a metric value in a source you can search for additional sources where the data is available and [[Adding and Tagging New Sources|add a new source]]</p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values for GRI-based metrics is available [[Researching_GRI_Metrics|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><strong>Global Reporting Initiative compliance guidance for companies:</strong></p><p>To calculate Water Volume Recycled - [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/water/Pages/G4-EN10.aspx|G4-EN10-a]]:</p><ul><li><p>​​Identify the volume of recycled and reused water.</p></li><li><p>Identify if water or flow meters do not exist and estimation by modelling is required.</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>For example, if the organization has a production cycle that requires 20 cubic meters of water per cycle, the organization withdraws 20 cubic meters of water for one production process cycle and then reuses it for an additional three cycles. The total volume of water recycled and reused for that process is 60 cubic meters.</p></li></ul><p>Reporting on this Indicator should include the following contextual information as a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>G4-EN10-c: standards, methodologies, and assumptions used.</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate_Social_Responsibility_Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "cubic metres",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 303 - Water and Effluents",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E3 - Water",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6: Clean Water and Sanitation",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6.3 Improve water quality by reducing pollution, halving untreated wastewater, and increasing recycling and safe reuse."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2281,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 61,
      "companies": 808,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Water_Volume_Recycled_GRI_303_3.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Water_Volume_Recycled_G4_EN10_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1822563,
      "name": "Kathleen F.+Reports on water usage in supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kathleen_F+Reports_on_water_usage_in_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Kathleen F.",
      "title": "Reports on water usage in supply chain",
      "question": "Is the company reporting on water usage of external contractors in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>If the company is reporting on water usage of their external contratcors in the supply chain, the value should be <strong>Yes</strong></p><p></p><p>If the company is not reporting on water usage of their external contractors in the supply chain, the value should be <strong>No</strong></p><p></p><p>If the researcher is not 100% confident whether the information found about the company reporting on water usage in the supply chain is sufficient to state yes, the value should be <strong>Unknown</strong></p><p></p><p>Ideally values of <strong>Unknown </strong>should be backed up wit a rationale, where possible.</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>First point of action should be to look at the corporate website and to look for the sustainability report. If they report on external water usage of contractors in the supply chain, then the value should be yes, if no information can be found then the value should be no. </p><p></p><p>When no sustainability report can be found then look for specific sections on the corporate website, whether they are mentioning a water management supervision system and whether they report on water usage of external partners in the supply chain. </p><p></p><p>Please also consider to contact the company directly when necessary. </p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 13,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 7,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kathleen_F+Reports_on_water_usage_in_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1822604,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Water sources significantly affected by withdrawal of water (G4-EN9)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Water_sources_significantly_affected_by_withdrawal_of_water_G4_EN9.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Water sources significantly affected by withdrawal of water (G4-EN9)",
      "question": "What is the number of water sources significantly affected by withdrawal of water?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate_Social_Responsibility_Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 303 - Water and Effluents",
        "GRI Standards+303-3 Water withdrawal",
        "GRI Standards+303-3-b Water withdrawal from water-stressed areas, broken down by source",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E3 - Water"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Water_sources_significantly_affected_by_withdrawal_of_water_G4_EN9+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1823561,
      "name": "Edidiong Uwemakpan+Use of Recycled Precious Metal",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Edidiong_Uwemakpan+Use_of_Recycled_Precious_Metal.json",
      "designer": "Edidiong Uwemakpan",
      "title": "Use of Recycled Precious Metal",
      "question": "Does the company use recycled metal for its jewellery?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>A typical gold ring results in 20 tons of mine waste, and more than 80% of gold mined in the world is used for jewellery. Metal mining in the United States is the single largest toxic polluter. Since metal can be melted down, refined and reused for fine jewellery without compromising the metal's integrity, recycled metal is a sustainable alternative for consumers concerned about the environmental impacts of mining.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Search the company's Corporate Social Responsibility Report for the phrase \"recycled precious metal\". If this is mentioned, read the surrounding information to determine if it was mentioned in passing or whether the company is taking steps to reduce environmental pollution due to metal refining..</p><ul><li><p>If it is clear that the company is taking steps to reduce this toxic pollution, the answer for this metric is <strong>Yes</strong>.</p></li><li><p>If this is not mentioned, or is done only in passing, enter <strong>No</strong> as the value.</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Edidiong_Uwemakpan+Use_of_Recycled_Precious_Metal+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1823605,
      "name": "Edidiong Uwemakpan+Fair-trade gems",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Edidiong_Uwemakpan+Fair_trade_gems.json",
      "designer": "Edidiong Uwemakpan",
      "title": "Fair-trade gems",
      "question": "Does the company track its gems from mine to market to ensure meet the protocols of being fair trade?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Fair Trade Gems are those that are closely tracked from mine to market to ensure that they have been handled according to a strict set of protocols. The protocols include environmental protection, fair labor practices, health and safety standards, and a tight chain of custody that eliminates the possibility of treated gems or synthetics being introduced into the supply chain. The program also includes promotion of cultural diversity, public education and industry accountability. Fair Trade Gems is a proprietary program of a specific gem dealer. Ethically sourced gems may meet the protocols of being fair trade, but not be traded through the supplier who owns the registration for this term</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking puts in extra effort to ensure that beyond mining, the gems it uses are well protected. </p><p>You should only answer this question with a “Yes” for a company if you find evidence the company's sourcing covers areas of \"Fair Trade\", Environmental Protection, Health and Safety Standard. Non-Synthectic Introduction into the supply chain.</p><p>If you find this kind of evidence and enter a “Yes” value please leave a comment with some details of what you found as a comment. </p><p>The only way to make this judgment is to read in detail the material the company produces about its responsible sourcing policies and practices.</p><p> You may be able to make this judgment faster by searching those materials for terms such as \"fair trade\" or \"fair labor\". </p><p>You can find relevant materials through Conflict Mineral Reports of the company.</p><p>If you don’t find any evidence that the company's responsible sourcing policy covers these areas – set the company’s value to “No” and include the document(s) you read as source(s).</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Edidiong_Uwemakpan+Fair_trade_gems+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1823624,
      "name": "Edidiong Uwemakpan+Ethically-Sourced Gems",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Edidiong_Uwemakpan+Ethically_Sourced_Gems.json",
      "designer": "Edidiong Uwemakpan",
      "title": "Ethically-Sourced Gems",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In the absence of universal jewelry industry standards and definitions of fair-trade, \"ethically-sourced\" refers to gems that have been mined, cut and polished with regard for the social and environmental impact. Whether or not a gem is ethically-sourced, the process of mining has significant environmental consequences. However, ethically sourced gems go beyond just conflict-free to indicate a positive community contribution</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Use your preferred search engine to search for “[Company name] Ethically Sourced Gems” or \"[Company name] responsible sourcing\" – when the company is well known this search should give you some high-ranking results that are pages on the company’s website. For companies that are not so well known, you may wish to limit the search to their official website (e.g. \"site: http://www.astleyclarke.com \"Ethically Sourced Gems” or \"site:http://www.astleyclarke.com responsible sourcing”– in Google search).</p><p>Where the company has a press report or page on their website in relation to Ethically Sourcing their Gems, they should receive a value of “Yes” and you should add a link to this page as the source. </p><p>Where you cannot report or a page on the company’s website that is talks about Ethically-Sourced Gems or responsible sourcing, set their value to “No” and make a “report” source – describe the domain you searched and give the date (e.g. \"http://www.astleyclarke.com/ searched on 13th October 2016)</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Edidiong_Uwemakpan+Ethically_Sourced_Gems+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1823737,
      "name": "Edidiong Uwemakpan+Lab-created Diamonds and Gems",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Edidiong_Uwemakpan+Lab_created_Diamonds_and_Gems.json",
      "designer": "Edidiong Uwemakpan",
      "title": "Lab-created Diamonds and Gems",
      "question": "Is there any indication that the company uses man-made stones?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Lab-created or man-made gems are chemically, optically and physically identical to mined gems.</p>\r\n<p>Unlike their mined counterparts, lab-created gems are not treated in any way to bring out a vibrant color. <br><br>The color of lab-created gems is inherent to the process and will not change over time. In reference to gemstones, the term \"lab-created\" is synonymous with man-made, lab-grown and synthetic. <br><br>Often, lab-created gems are only identifiable to a trained jeweler by their high standard of clarity. It is possible for lab-created gems to be perfectly flawless. <br><br>Lab-created gems are considered by many to be the most sustainable option available in gems.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Search -  \"Company Name\" Lab Created Gems or diamonds.</p><p>If a report or text is available to confirm this, enter the value \"Yes\" and cite the source, as well as the year which the source was published. </p><p></p><p>If a report or publication is not available to confirm that a select company uses Lab-created diamonds or gems, then input the value \"No\"; citing the date of research and links searched. </p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Edidiong_Uwemakpan+Lab_created_Diamonds_and_Gems+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1823872,
      "name": "Edidiong Uwemakpan+Canadian Diamonds",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Edidiong_Uwemakpan+Canadian_Diamonds.json",
      "designer": "Edidiong Uwemakpan",
      "title": "Canadian Diamonds",
      "question": "Does this company make use of Canadian Diamonds",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Diamonds that are labeled as Canadian diamonds are guaranteed to be conflict free in that they originate in a country of peace where there is no armed conflict. Most diamonds mined in Canada are shipped to India and Africa for cutting and polishing. Only those with the added certification of being from the Northwest Territories are cut and polished in-country. Of the five diamond mines in Canada, only 1 is majority owned by a Canadian company.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>When a company uses Canadian diamonds instead of sourcing from Africa, it showcases a deeper interest in sourcing minerals responsibly.</p><p>To add a value to this metric, search \"Company Name - Canadian Diamonds\" and check for publications which state that the company sources its diamond from Canada. </p><p>If you find this publication, input the value \"Yes\", citing the source and Year. </p><p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Edidiong_Uwemakpan+Canadian_Diamonds+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1825282,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Total Pledged Amount",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Total_Pledged_Amount.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Total Pledged Amount",
      "question": "What is the total amount that the company has pledged to helping achieve the SDGs in the Half a Billion Dollars Challenge context?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers the goal of the GSC Half-Billion Dollars Challenge in relation to the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. This metric indicates the total budgetary allocation towards one or more of the SDGs by each company. The SDGs are estimated to cost US$3 trillion per year to achieve, and much of this will need to come from private resources. Long-term investments are needed in sustainable energy, infrastructure, transport, and information and communications technologies, among other sectors. Showcasing company leadership to support and promote the SDGs sets an example for businesses worldwide.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge. <br></p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge. <br></p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, determine how much the company in question has <strong>pledged in total to advancing one or more of the SDGs</strong>. </p></li></ul><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:<br></p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council<br></p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br></p></li><li><p>Annual Report<br></p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports<br></p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.<br></p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Total_Pledged_Amount+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1825301,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Company Pledge Depth - SDG1",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG1.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Company Pledge Depth - SDG1",
      "question": "How much did the company pledge to advancing SDG 1?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers Sustainable Development Goal 1 of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 1 aims to end poverty in all forms everywhere by 2030. Poverty includes more than the lack of resources to ensure a sustainable livelihood. SDG 1 has made significant strides to ensure access to education and other basic services and to eliminate hunger, malnutrition and social discrimination. Economic growth will provide sustainable jobs and promote equality.</p><p><br>[[http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/1_Why-it-Matters_Poverty_2p.pdf| No Poverty: Why it Matters]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge.</p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge.</p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG.</p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge.</p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, using the drop-down arrow you can determine how much the company in question has <strong>pledged to advancing SDG 1.</strong></p></li></ul><p></p><p></p><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:</p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [
        "Internally",
        "Externally",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1826166,
      "name": "Ted Fargus+Amount of food donated",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Ted_Fargus+Amount_of_food_donated.json",
      "designer": "Ted Fargus",
      "title": "Amount of food donated",
      "question": "What is the amount of food donated to food banks or other operations (in lbs)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Ted_Fargus+Amount_of_food_donated+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1827651,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+Modern Slavery Statement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Modern_Slavery_Statement.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "question": "Did the company produce a statement in relation to any Modern Slavery legislation or Act?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric records whether the company produced a statement in accordance with the <strong>UK's Modern Slavery Act</strong> 2015, <strong>Australian Modern Slavery Act</strong> 2018, and/or the <strong>California Transparency in Supply Chains Act</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>Since August 2024, this metric also captures whether the statement in question is used to meet the company's obligations under the <strong>Canadian Act (Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act) </strong>and<strong> the Norwegian Transparency Act.</strong></p>\r\n<p>This metric includes only some of the statements available on the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Business and Human Rights Resource Centre's</span> [[http://www.modernslaveryregistry.org/|registry of Modern Slavery Act statements]] - you are encouraged to consult the different available registries directly to find statement that are not yet available on Wikirate.</p>\r\n<p>Section 54 of the UK Modern Slavery Act requires a commercial organisation that has a turnover of over £36 million with operations in the UK to publish a slavery and human trafficking statement each year which sets out the steps it has taken to ensure there is no slavery or trafficking in its supply chains or its own business, or states that it has taken no such steps.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company has published a statement in relation to the Modern Slavery Act 2015, the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act, the Australian Act, the Canadian Act, Norwegian Transparency Act, or none of the above. If you can find a relevant statement give the company a \"<strong>Yes - UK Modern Slavery Act</strong>\" and/or \"<strong>Yes - Australian Modern Slavery Act</strong>\" and/or \"<strong>Yes - California Transparency in Supply Chains Act</strong>\" value, etc, and add/cite that statement as a source. There are other metrics which ask questions about whether the company's statement complies with the law and whether it contains certain kinds of information. For this metric, any statement that is intended as a \"Modern Slavery Act statement\" counts for a \"<strong>Yes</strong>\" value.</p>\r\n<p>The UK and Australian governments maintain registries of statements:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>https://modern-slavery-statement-registry.service.gov.uk/</li>\r\n<li><a href=\"https://modernslaveryregister.gov.au/\">https://modernslaveryregister.gov.au/</a></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Every quarter, Wikirate retrieves as many statements as it can from these registries using semi-automated techinques so you will find many [[https://wikirate.org/Source?filter%5Breport_type%5D=Modern%20Slavery%20Statement|statements waiting to be assessed on Wikirate]].</p>\r\n<p>Furthermore the [[https://business-humanrights.org|Business &amp; Human Rights Resource Centre]] maintains an [[https://www.modernslaveryregistry.org|archive of Modern Slavery Act statements]].</p>\r\n<p>If the company you are researching does not appear on the registries, try searching the web for terms like \"[Company name] modern slavery statement\". These statements should be linked to from a company's homepage but this is not always the case.</p>\r\n<p>These statements can be called things like:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Modern Slavery Act statement</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Slavery and Trafficking statement</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>If you cannot find a relevant statement by the company, and you believe they are required to produce one, add a new \"report\" source that explains how you searched, and give the company a value of \"<strong>No - neither</strong>\".</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<p><br>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018<br>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><br><br></p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - UK Modern Slavery Act",
        "Yes - California Transparency in Supply Chains Act",
        "Yes - Australian Modern Slavery Act",
        "Yes - Norwegian Transparency Act",
        "Yes - Canadian Act",
        "No - neither"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+Modern Slavery Statement+Philipp Kuehl"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 72743,
      "bookmarkers": 33,
      "datasets": 92,
      "companies": 27579,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Modern_Slavery_Statement+Philipp_Kuehl.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_statement_homepage_link.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Garment_Sector.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Hospitality_Sector.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Financial_Services_Sector.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_Registry_Submission.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Food_Beverages_Sector.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_UK_MSA_Requirements.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Modern_Slavery_Statement.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Modern_Slavery_Statement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1827673,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+MSA homepage link",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+MSA_homepage_link.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "MSA homepage link",
      "question": "Does the company publish a link to their modern slavery statement on their homepage? \r\n*Note: The “Year” selected should be the period covered by the Statement. See Methodology.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is about whether the company complied with the <span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">UK Modern Slavery Act </span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">requirement to link to their statement from the homepage of their website. To research this metric first navigate to the company's home page. </span><span style=\"text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">This means <strong>companies provide either a direct link on the homepage, or an appropriately titled link in a drop-down menu</strong> on the homepage (for example, a direct link in a drop-down titled “Sustainability”).</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">If you are researching an international or UK-based company, first navigate to the company's UK home page. If you are researching an Australian company, look at their Australian site. A good starting point to researching this metric is to use a search engine to search for the company name, click through to the company's website, and perform a search on this page (ctrl+f) for terms like “MSA” or \"slavery\".</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">You will probably need to add a new source representing the homepage, so click the \"Add a new source\" button and enter the company's homepage URL as the new source </span><span style=\"text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">or [[https://wikirate.org/Saving_a_webpage_as_a_PDF| save the page as a PDF and add as a file]].</span></p>\r\n<p>If a link to the company's Modern Slavery Act statement appears on the homepage of their website, a value of \"<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes</span>\" should be added, and it should cite the homepage URL as the source. If no mention of the Modern Slavery Act statement can be found on the company's homepage or in a drop-down menu, a \"<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">No</span>\" value should be added, and it should cite the URL of the homepage where you looked for the statement as it's source.</p>\r\n<p>Some companies have a separate \"corporate\" website (e.g. <a href=\"http://btplc.com/\" target=\"_blank\">btplc.com</a> is the corporate site of BT Group), if this is the case then placement on the homepage of this site counts for a \"<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes</span>\" value.</p>\r\n<p>When adding a \"<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes</span>\" value, please include a short comment explaining where you found the link.</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for companies providing homepage link in Dropdown|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #ff0000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">When researching this metric the \"Year\" field should be set to the reporting year of the statement.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">When </span>a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in April 2019 = 2018</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in May 2019 (or later) = 2019</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1016,
      "bookmarkers": 17,
      "datasets": 76,
      "companies": 569,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_statement_homepage_link.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+MSA_homepage_link+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1827915,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+MSA Statement Approval",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+MSA_Statement_Approval.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "MSA Statement Approval",
      "question": "Was the company's Modern Slavery Act statement explicitly approved by the board of directors (or equivalent management body)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The MSA requires that the statements are discussed at senior management level and approved by the Board of Directors, Members, or Partners (who signs it is dependent on the type of company it is). This ensures senior level accountability, leadership and responsibility for modern slavery and gives it the serious attention it deserves.</p>\r\n<p>A<strong> board of directors </strong>(B of D) is a group of individuals that are elected as, or elected to act as, representatives of the stockholders to establish corporate management related policies and to make decisions on major company issues.</p>\r\n<p>A <strong>member </strong>must sign when it is a limited liability partnership. A member is a partner in a business who is only liable for the money they invest in the business, not the business or other partners.</p>\r\n<p>A<strong> partner </strong>must sign when it is a limited partnership, or any other type of organisation. Partners have management control, share the right to use partnership property, share the profits and have joint and liability for debts of the partnership.<br><br>For further information on approval of a statement please read the <a href=\"https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf\">Home Office Guidance, page 13</a>.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Where the statement includes an explicit statement that it has been approved by Board of Directors select the \"<strong>Approved by Board</strong>\" option.</p>\r\n<p>Approval for the statement can usually be found near the end of the document. If the statement has been explicitly approved by some entity or person other than the board of directors, please select \"<strong>Approved - not by Board</strong>\" and add the relevant sentence as a comment on your value. If no explicit approval can be found choose the \"<strong>Approval not explicit in statement</strong>\" value.</p>\r\n<p><strong>NOTE: explicit approval is not the same as signature - this is covered under the metric</strong> [[http://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+MSA_statement_signed| MSA Statement Signed]].</p>\r\n<p>If the entity has a sole director and the report names the sole director and clearly states that the statement has been approved by that individual as the Sole Director, please select \"Approved by Board\". </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Approval not explicit in statement",
        "Approved by Board",
        "Approved - not by Board"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4198,
      "bookmarkers": 8,
      "datasets": 82,
      "companies": 2528,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+MSA_Statement_Approval_binary.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_UK_MSA_Requirements.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+MSA_Statement_Approval+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1828154,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Worker Wage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Worker_Wage.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Worker Wage",
      "question": "What is the average wage of workers compared to the average minimum wage?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers one of the requirements under [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf| PF indicator 1.2]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool* concerned with livelihoods, which refers to the ability of people living in poverty to meet essential needs for themselves and their family, i.e., adequate food, housing, clothing, and healthcare, in the context of supporting and protecting their rights. Beyond earnings, it refers to the opportunity for individuals to pursue options for personal development, upward mobility, career development, and security.</p><p>This indicator, furthermore, falls under the 1st Corporate area Dimension, <em>value chains</em>, which refers to how a company’s value chain and its procurement, manufacturing, and distribution policies and/or practices influence the ability of people living in poverty to access good-quality employment, earn a living wage or sustain a business, and participate in the market.</p><h6><br>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).</h6>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology:</p><ul><li><p>survey workers, and audits</p></li><li><p>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as:</p><ul><li><p>legal minimum wages and benefits entitlement to workers in the country of study</p></li><li><p>wage benchmarks (poverty thresholds, industry average, national average income, etc.)</p></li><li><p>commodity prices (as per market prices)</p></li><li><p>average household sizes (important to consider in living wage calculations)</p></li><li><p>existing living wage calculations</p></li></ul></li></ul><p><br>However, Wikirate researchers may review one of the following company statements using search terms like \"wages\", \"salary\", \"worker pay\" and \"average wage\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>the ratio of worker wage in comparison to the average minimum wage</strong>:</p><ul><li><p>Poverty Footprint</p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li></ul><p><br>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>any additional disclosure regarding wages, e.g. policy statements, the average number of hours, etc.</p></li><li><p>whether the disclosed ratio extends to the entire value chain</p></li><li><p>the page number of the report where this information can be found</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Worker_Wage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1828173,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Male Worker Wage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Male_Worker_Wage.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Male Worker Wage",
      "question": "What is the average wage of male workers compared to the average minimum wage?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers one of the requirements under [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf| PF indicator 1.2]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool* concerned with<em> livelihoods</em>, which refers to the ability of people living in poverty to meet essential needs for themselves and their family, i.e., adequate food, housing, clothing, and healthcare, in the context of supporting and protecting their rights. Beyond earnings, it refers to the opportunity for individuals to pursue options for personal development, upward mobility, career development, and security.</p><p>This indicator, furthermore, falls under the 1st Corporate area Dimension, <em>value chains</em>, which refers to how a company’s value chain and its procurement, manufacturing, and distribution policies and/or practices influence the ability of people living in poverty to access good-quality employment, earn a living wage or sustain a business, and participate in the market.</p><h6><br>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).</h6>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology:</p><ul><li><p>survey workers, and audits</p></li><li><p>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as:</p><ul><li><p>legal minimum wages and benefits entitlement to workers in the country of study</p></li><li><p>wage benchmarks (poverty thresholds, industry average, national average income, etc.)</p></li><li><p>commodity prices (as per market prices)</p></li><li><p>average household sizes (important to consider in living wage calculations)</p></li><li><p>existing living wage calculations</p></li></ul></li></ul><p><br>However, Wikirate researchers may review one of the following company statements using search terms like \"wages\", \"salary\", \"worker pay\" and \"average wage\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>the ratio of male worker wage in comparison to the average minimum wage</strong>:</p><ul><li><p>Poverty Footprint</p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li></ul><p><br>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>any additional disclosure regarding wages, e.g. policy statements, the average number of hours, etc.</p></li><li><p>whether the disclosed ratio extends to the entire value chain</p></li><li><p>the page number of the report where this information can be found</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Male_Worker_Wage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1828190,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Female Worker Wage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Female_Worker_Wage.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Female Worker Wage",
      "question": "What is the average wage of female workers compared to the average minimum wage?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers one of the requirements under [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf| PF indicator 1.2]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool* concerned with <em>livelihoods</em>, which refers to the ability of people living in poverty to meet essential needs for themselves and their family, i.e., adequate food, housing, clothing, and healthcare, in the context of supporting and protecting their rights. Beyond earnings, it refers to the opportunity for individuals to pursue options for personal development, upward mobility, career development, and security.</p><p>This indicator, furthermore, falls under the 1st Corporate area Dimension, <em>value chains</em>, which refers to how a company’s value chain and its procurement, manufacturing, and distribution policies and/or practices influence the ability of people living in poverty to access good-quality employment, earn a living wage or sustain a business, and participate in the market.</p><h6><br>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).</h6>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology:</p><ul><li><p>survey workers, and audits</p></li><li><p>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as:</p><ul><li><p>legal minimum wages and benefits entitlement to workers in the country of study</p></li><li><p>wage benchmarks (poverty thresholds, industry average, national average income, etc.)</p></li><li><p>commodity prices (as per market prices)</p></li><li><p>average household sizes (important to consider in living wage calculations)</p></li><li><p>existing living wage calculations</p></li></ul></li></ul><p><br>However, Wikirate researchers may review one of the following company statements using search terms like \"wages\", \"salary\", \"worker pay\" and \"average wage\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>the ratio of female worker wage in comparison to the average minimum wage</strong>:</p><ul><li><p>Poverty Footprint</p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li></ul><p><br>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>any additional disclosure regarding wages, e.g. policy statements, the average number of hours, etc.</p></li><li><p>whether the disclosed ratio extends to the entire value chain</p></li><li><p>the page number of the report where this information can be found</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Female_Worker_Wage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1828207,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Company Investment Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Company_Investment_Strategy.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Company Investment Strategy",
      "question": "What is the company's planned investments strategy in the country?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers one of the requirements under [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf| PF indicator 2.12]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool* concerned with <em>livelihoods (security of income)</em>, which refers to: earnings, wages and benefits; security of income; labour rights and working conditions; access to training, credit and extension services; upward mobility; and the economic development of the community. </p><p>It covers questions related to macro-economy and how a company’s economic contributions, including distribution of profits, shareholder dividends, taxes, and employment, affect the standard of living of those living in poverty, or the balance of payments, in countries of operation. In general, this indicator demonstrates how the Corporate Areas of the “5 by 5 Framework” may contribute to or impact poverty and also suggests to companies areas or opportunities for improvement.</p><h6><br>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).</h6>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology:</p><ul><li><p>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as:</p><ul><li><p>commodity price volatility</p></li><li><p>seasonal business parttern(s)</p></li><li><p>savings and financial literacy</p></li><li><p>relative purchasing power</p></li></ul></li></ul><p>However, Wikirate researchers may review one of the following company statements using search terms like \"security of income\", \"company investment\", and \"investment strategy\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>what it has planned regarding investments (or divestments) in the country it operates in</strong>:</p><ul><li><p>Poverty Footprint</p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsiblity Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li></ul><p></p><p>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>any additional disclosure regarding investment strategies, e.g. policy statements, company's plans in the country, etc.</p></li><li><p>the page number of the report where this information can be found</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Maintain a similar level of investment in the coming years",
        "Increase its investment or volume of trade",
        "Divest or reduce volume of trade with suppliers and distributors",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Company_Investment_Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1828225,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Collective Bargaining in Value Chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Collective_Bargaining_in_Value_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Collective Bargaining in Value Chain",
      "question": "Do major employers along the value chain and the wider company system negotiate wage and benefits standards through collective agreements?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers one of the requirements under [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf| PF indicator 1.12]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool* concerned with <em>livelihoods</em>, which refers to the ability of people living in poverty to meet essential needs for themselves and their family, i.e., adequate food, housing, clothing, and healthcare, in the context of supporting and protecting their rights. Beyond earnings, it refers to the opportunity for individuals to pursue options for personal development, upward mobility, career development, and security.<br><br>It also highlights how a company’s value chain and its procurement, manufacturing, and distribution policies and/or practices influence the ability of people living in poverty to access good-quality employment, earn a living wage or sustain a business, and participate in the market.The indicator demonstrates how the Corporate Areas of the “5 by 5 Framework” may contribute to or impact poverty. In general, these indicators also suggest to companies areas or opportunities for improvement.</p><p></p><h6>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).</h6>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology:</p><ul><li><p>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as:</p><ul><li><p>legal minimum wages and benefits entitlement to workers in the country of study</p></li><li><p>wage benchmarks (poverty thresholds, industry average, national average income, etc.)</p></li><li><p>commodity prices (as per market prices)</p></li><li><p>average household sizes (important to consider in living wage calculations)</p></li><li><p>existing living wage calculations</p><p></p></li></ul></li></ul><p>However, Wikirate researchers may review one of the following company statements using search terms like \"collective agreements\", \"collective bargaining\", and \"freedom of association\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>whether the company itself as well as major employers along the value chain negotiate wages and/or benefits with their workers</strong>:</p><ul><li><p>Poverty Footprint</p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsiblity Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>Other reports or surveys</p></li></ul><p></p><p>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>any additional disclosure regarding wages, negotiations, etc. like policy statements, percentage applicability and so on. </p></li><li><p>whether the company publicly discloses whether it negotiates wages/benefits with its workers</p></li><li><p>the page number of the report where this information can be found</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Some"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG1 - No Poverty",
        "UN SDGs+SDG1.1 Eradicate extreme poverty everywhere.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.8 Protect labour rights and ensure safe, secure working environments for all workers, including migrants."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 186,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 12,
      "companies": 181,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Collective_Bargaining_in_Value_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1828243,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Fair Trade Mechanism",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Fair_Trade_Mechanism.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Fair Trade Mechanism",
      "question": "Does the company have a mechanism to ensure that small-scale suppliers and/or distributors are paid a fair price for goods, services, and/or crops supplied to the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers one of the requirements under [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf| PF indicator 1.11]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool* concerned with <em>livelihoods</em>, which refers to the ability of people living in poverty to meet essential needs for themselves and their family, i.e., adequate food, housing, clothing, and healthcare, in the context of supporting and protecting their rights. Beyond earnings, it refers to the opportunity for individuals to pursue options for personal development, upward mobility, career development, and security.<br><br>It also highlights how a company’s value chain and its procurement, manufacturing, and distribution policies and/or practices influence the ability of people living in poverty to access good-quality employment, earn a living wage or sustain a business, and participate in the market.The indicator demonstrates how the Corporate Areas of the “5 by 5 Framework” may contribute to or impact poverty. In general, these indicators also suggest to companies areas or opportunities for improvement.</p>\r\n<p>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>legal minimum wages and benefits entitlement to workers in the country of study</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>wage benchmarks (poverty thresholds, industry average, national average income, etc.)</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>commodity prices (as per market prices)</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>average household sizes (important to consider in living wage calculations)</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>existing living wage calculations</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>However, Wikirate researchers may review one of the following company statements using search terms like \"fairtrade\", \"fair trade\", \"fair prices\", and \"local procurement\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>if it has a fairtrade policy/mechanism in place</strong>:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Poverty Footprint</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Annual Report</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Other reports or surveys</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>any additional disclosure regarding supply chain disclosures, local vs. international procurement, etc.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>the page number of the report where this information can be found</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1486,
      "bookmarkers": 15,
      "datasets": 20,
      "companies": 668,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Fair_Trade_Mechanism+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1828256,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Workers with Additional Jobs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Workers_with_Additional_Jobs.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Workers with Additional Jobs",
      "question": "What's the estimated proportion of workers along the value chain who have other jobs to sustain their livelihoods?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers one of the requirements under [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf| PF indicator 1.4]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool* concerned with <em>livelihoods</em>, which refers to the ability of people living in poverty to meet essential needs for themselves and their family, i.e., adequate food, housing, clothing, and healthcare, in the context of supporting and protecting their rights. Beyond earnings, it refers to the opportunity for individuals to pursue options for personal development, upward mobility, career development, and security.</p><p>This indicator, furthermore, falls under the 1st Corporate area Dimension, <em>value chains</em>, which refers to how a company’s value chain and its procurement, manufacturing, and distribution policies and/or practices influence the ability of people living in poverty to access good-quality employment, earn a living wage or sustain a business, and participate in the market.</p><h6><br>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).</h6>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology:</p><ul><li><p>survey workers</p></li><li><p>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as:</p><ul><li><p>legal minimum wages and benefits entitlement to workers in the country of study</p></li><li><p>wage benchmarks (poverty thresholds, industry average, national average income, etc.)</p></li><li><p>commodity prices (as per market prices)</p></li><li><p>average household sizes (important to consider in living wage calculations)</p></li><li><p>existing living wage calculations</p></li></ul></li></ul><p>However, Wikirate researchers may review one of the following company statements using search terms like \"additional work\", \"second job\", and \"partial income\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>an estimated proportion of workers that take up more than one job to sustain their livelihoods</strong>:</p><ul><li><p>Poverty Footprint</p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p><p></p></li></ul><p>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>any additional disclosure regarding workers' livelihoods</p></li><li><p>the page number of the document where this information can be found</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Workers_with_Additional_Jobs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1828279,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Male Workers with Additional Jobs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Male_Workers_with_Additional_Jobs.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Male Workers with Additional Jobs",
      "question": "What's the estimated proportion of male workers along the value chain who have other jobs to sustain their livelihoods?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers one of the requirements under [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf| PF indicator 1.4]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool* concerned with <em>livelihoods</em>, which refers to the ability of people living in poverty to meet essential needs for themselves and their family, i.e., adequate food, housing, clothing, and healthcare, in the context of supporting and protecting their rights. Beyond earnings, it refers to the opportunity for individuals to pursue options for personal development, upward mobility, career development, and security.</p><p>This indicator, furthermore, falls under the 1st Corporate area Dimension, <em>value chains</em>, which refers to how a company’s value chain and its procurement, manufacturing, and distribution policies and/or practices influence the ability of people living in poverty to access good-quality employment, earn a living wage or sustain a business, and participate in the market.</p><h6><br>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).</h6>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology:</p><ul><li><p>survey workers</p></li><li><p>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as:</p><ul><li><p>legal minimum wages and benefits entitlement to workers in the country of study</p></li><li><p>wage benchmarks (poverty thresholds, industry average, national average income, etc.)</p></li><li><p>commodity prices (as per market prices)</p></li><li><p>average household sizes (important to consider in living wage calculations)</p></li><li><p>existing living wage calculations</p></li></ul></li></ul><p>However, Wikirate researchers may review one of the following company statements using search terms like \"additional work\", \"second job\", and \"partial income\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>an estimated proportion of male workers that take up more than one job to sustain their livelihoods</strong>:</p><ul><li><p>Poverty Footprint</p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p><p></p></li></ul><p>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>any additional disclosure regarding workers' livelihoods</p></li><li><p>the page number of the document where this information can be found</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Male_Workers_with_Additional_Jobs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1828301,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Female Workers with Additional Jobs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Female_Workers_with_Additional_Jobs.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Female Workers with Additional Jobs",
      "question": "What's the estimated proportion of female workers along the value chain who have other jobs to sustain their livelihoods?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers one of the requirements under [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf| PF indicator 1.4]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool* concerned with <em>livelihoods</em>, which refers to the ability of people living in poverty to meet essential needs for themselves and their family, i.e., adequate food, housing, clothing, and healthcare, in the context of supporting and protecting their rights. Beyond earnings, it refers to the opportunity for individuals to pursue options for personal development, upward mobility, career development, and security.</p><p>This indicator, furthermore, falls under the 1st Corporate area Dimension, <em>value chains</em>, which refers to how a company’s value chain and its procurement, manufacturing, and distribution policies and/or practices influence the ability of people living in poverty to access good-quality employment, earn a living wage or sustain a business, and participate in the market.</p><h6><br>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).</h6>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology:</p><ul><li><p>survey workers</p></li><li><p>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as:</p><ul><li><p>legal minimum wages and benefits entitlement to workers in the country of study</p></li><li><p>wage benchmarks (poverty thresholds, industry average, national average income, etc.)</p></li><li><p>commodity prices (as per market prices)</p></li><li><p>average household sizes (important to consider in living wage calculations)</p></li><li><p>existing living wage calculations</p></li></ul></li></ul><p>However, Wikirate researchers may review one of the following company statements using search terms like \"additional work\", \"second job\", and \"partial income\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>an estimated proportion of female workers that take up more than one job to sustain their livelihoods</strong>:</p><ul><li><p>Poverty Footprint</p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p><p></p></li></ul><p>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>any additional disclosure regarding workers' livelihoods</p></li><li><p>the page number of the document where this information can be found</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Female_Workers_with_Additional_Jobs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1829113,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Working Overtime",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Working_Overtime.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Working Overtime",
      "question": "What percentage of workers work overtime on a regular basis?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers one of the requirements under [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf| PF indicator 3.4]]<strong> </strong>of the Poverty Footprint Tool.* It is part of the first Poverty Dimension, <em>livelihoods</em>, which refers to the ability of people living in poverty to meet essential needs for themselves and their family, i.e., adequate food, housing, clothing, and healthcare, in the context of supporting and protecting their rights. Beyond earnings, it refers to the opportunity for individuals to pursue options for personal development, upward mobility, career development, and security.</p><p>More specifically, within this dimension, this particular indicator addresses the category <em>labour rights and working conditions</em>. An indicator like this helps determine whether key populations are able to protect their basic rights, and maintain their health and well-being at their place of work.</p><p><strong>Overtime</strong> is the amount of time someone works beyond normal working hours. The term is also used for the pay received for this time. Most nations have overtime labour laws designed to dissuade or prevent employers from forcing their employees to work excessively long hours. (Source: [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overtime|Wikipedia]] )</p><p>As a basis for analysis: Ethical Trading Initiative (ETI) base code standards on overtime stipulates: “Working hours comply with national laws and benchmark industry standards, whichever affords greater protection. In any event, workers shall not on a regular basis be required to work in excess of 48 hours per week and shall be provided with at least one day off for every 7 day period on average. Overtime shall be voluntary, shall not exceed 12 hours per week, shall not be demanded on a regular basis and shall always be compensated at a premium rate.</p><h6>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).</h6>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology:</p><ul><li><p>survey workers, workers' representatives, management, and audits.</p></li><li><p>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as existing labour rights law for the country in question</p></li></ul><p></p><p>However, Wikirate researchers may review one of the following company statements using search terms like \"overtime\", \"over-hours\", and \"working hours\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>the percentage of workers that work overtime on a regular basis</strong>:</p><ul><li><p>Poverty Footprint</p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li></ul><p></p><p>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>any additional disclosure regarding overtime practices, e.g. policy statements, the average number of hours, whether there is compensation for worked overtime in terms of money or time off, etc.</p></li><li><p>whether the disclosed percentage extends to their entire value chain.</p></li><li><p>the page number of the document where the information can be found</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 46,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Working_Overtime+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1829136,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Anti-Corruption Declaration",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Anti_Corruption_Declaration.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Anti-Corruption Declaration",
      "question": "Does the company publicly state that it will work against corruption in all its forms, including bribery and extortion?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf| PF indicator 6.19]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool.* It is part of the first Poverty Dimension,<em> livelihoods</em>, which refers to the ability of people living in poverty to meet essential needs for themselves and their family, i.e., adequate food, housing, clothing, and healthcare, in the context of supporting and protecting their rights. Beyond earnings, it refers to the opportunity for individuals to pursue options for personal development, upward mobility, career development, and security. More specifically, within this dimension, this particular indicator addresses the category <em>Economic Development of Community</em>, which includes impacts of bribery and corruption for local socio-economic development.</p><p></p><p>This indicator, furthermore, falls under the 3rd Corporate area Dimension, <em>institutions and policy</em>, which refers to how the company’s actions regarding institutions and policy affect the well-being of people living in developing countries. It considers the effects of lobbying, direct investment, procurement and distribution practices in relation to the development of institutions (such as producer organizations, unions, social networks, women’s groups) and policies that focus on trade, finance, education, rule of law, and health.</p><p></p><p><strong>Corruption</strong> is a form of dishonest or unethical conduct by a person entrusted with a position of authority, often to acquire personal benefit. Corruption may include many activities including bribery and embezzlement, though it may also involve practices that are legal in many countries. Government, or 'political', corruption occurs when an office-holder or other governmental employee acts in an official capacity for personal gain. (Source: [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption| Wikipedia]] )</p><p></p><h6>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).</h6>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology:</p><ul><li><p>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as:</p><ul><li><p>local economic development conditions</p></li><li><p>corporate tax laws and obligations in relevant jurisdictions</p></li><li><p>corruption/bribery in the local context</p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>However, Wikirate researchers may review one of the following company statements using search terms like \"corruption\", \"anti-corruption\", ''bribery\", and \"anti-bribery\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>that it will work against all forms of corruption</strong>:</p><ul><li><p>Poverty Footprint</p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li></ul><p>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>any additional disclosure regarding anti-corruption practices, e.g. policy statements, number of corruption cases reported, steps taken to fight corruption, etc.</p></li><li><p>whether the anti-corruption commitment extends to their entire value chain</p></li><li><p>the page number of the document where this information can be found</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 466,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 26,
      "companies": 292,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Anti_Corruption_Declaration+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1830032,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Access to Healthcare for Work-related Incidents",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Access_to_Healthcare_for_Work_related_Incidents.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Access to Healthcare for Work-related Incidents",
      "question": "What percentage of workers have access to health services for work-related accidents or diseases made available or paid for by the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers one of the requirements under [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf|PF indicator 13.7]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool.* It is part of the 3rd Poverty Dimension, health and well-being, which refers to the objective that the presence and engagement of the company and its value chain will support – and will not harm – the continuous improvement of health, safety, security, and general well-being of individuals and communities. More specifically, within this dimension, this particular indicator addresses the category Health Status of Men and Women Smallholders and Workers Along the Value Chain.<br></p><h6><br>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).</h6>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>survey local health workers, and local health authorities</li>\r\n<li>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>public health concerns in the community and country of study (e.g. HIV/AIDS, climate change impact on health, etc.)</li>\r\n<li>recommended health and safety practices for workers in the industry (e.g., highest industry standards)</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>However, <strong>Wikirate researchers</strong> may review one of the following company statements using search terms like \"health services\", \"healthcare\", \"health care\", 'healthcare facilities', and ''accessible healthcare\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>the percentage of workers who have access to health services for work-related accidents or diseases, made available or paid for by the company</strong>:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Poverty Footprint</li>\r\n<li>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</li>\r\n<li>Annual Report</li>\r\n<li>CSO Statements or Reports</li>\r\n<li>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>any additional disclosure regarding the provision of health services for work-related incidents, e.g. policy statements, number of cases reported, types of health service available, etc.</li>\r\n<li>whether the provision of health services for work-related incidents extends to their entire value chain.</li>\r\n<li>the page number of the document where the information can be found</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Emergency Preparedness",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1253,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 25,
      "companies": 664,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Access_to_Healthcare_for_Work_related_Incidents+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1830130,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Access to Healthcare for Non-work-related Incidents",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Access_to_Healthcare_for_Non_work_related_Incidents.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Access to Healthcare for Non-work-related Incidents",
      "question": "What percentage of workers have access to health services for other personal health issues (not related to or caused by work) made available or paid for by the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers one of the requirements under [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf|PF indicator 13.7]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool.* It is part of the 3rd Poverty Dimension, <em>health and well-being</em>, which refers to the objective that the presence and engagement of the company and its value chain will support – and will not harm – the continuous improvement of health, safety, security, and general well-being of individuals and communities. More specifically, within this dimension, this particular indicator addresses the category <em>Health Status of Men and Women Smallholders and Workers Along the Value Chain</em>.</p><p></p><h6>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).</h6>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology:</p><ul><li><p>survey local health workers, and local health authorities</p></li><li><p>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as:</p><ul><li><p>public health concerns in the community and country of study (e.g. HIV/AIDS, climate change impact on health, etc.)</p></li><li><p>recommended health and safety practices for workers in the industry (e.g., highest industry standards)</p></li></ul></li></ul><p>However, Wikirate researchers may review one of the following company statements using search terms like \"health services\", \"healthcare\", \"health care\", \"healthcare facilities\", and ''accessible healthcare\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>the percentage of workers who have access to health services for other personal health issues (not related to or caused by work), made available or paid for by the company</strong>:</p><ul><li><p>Poverty Footprint</p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li></ul><p></p><p>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>any additional disclosure regarding the provision of health services for personal incidents, e.g. policy statements, number of cases reported, types of health service available, etc.</p></li><li><p>whether the provision of health services for non-work-related incidents extends to their entire value chain.</p></li><li><p>the page number of the document where the information can be found</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 35,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Access_to_Healthcare_for_Non_work_related_Incidents+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1830146,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Access to Childcare Services",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Access_to_Childcare_Services.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Access to Childcare Services",
      "question": "What percentage of young children of working parents have access to local, affordable and safe childcare services?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf|PF indicator 15.2]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool.* It is part of the 3rd Poverty Dimension, <em>health and well-being</em>, which refers to the objective that the presence and engagement of the company and its value chain will support – and will not harm – the continuous improvement of health, safety, security, and general well-being of individuals and communities. More specifically, within this dimension, this particular indicator addresses the category <em>Child Development (Boys and Girls)</em>.</p><p>This indicator, furthermore, falls under the 1st Corporate area Dimension, <em>value chains</em>, which refers to how a company’s value chain and its procurement, manufacturing, and distribution policies and/or practices influence the ability of people living in poverty to access good-quality employment, earn a living wage or sustain a business, and participate in the market.</p><h6>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).</h6>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology: </p><ul><li><p>survey community representatives, working parents, local authorities </p></li><li><p>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as local school enrollment ratio (for boys and girls) </p></li></ul><p></p><p>However, Wikirate researchers may review one of the following company statements using search terms like 'childcare service', 'childcare facilities', and ''accessible childcare\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>the percentage of young children of working parents who have access to local, affordable and safe childcare services</strong>: </p><ul><li><p>Poverty Footprint </p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report </p></li><li><p>Annual Report </p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports </p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc. </p></li></ul><p></p><p>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value: </p><ul><li><p>any additional disclosure regarding available childcare services, e.g. policy statements, number of use cases, costs, types of childcare services available, etc. </p></li><li><p>whether the percentage of young children of working parents who have access to local, affordable and safe childcare services applies to their entire value chain</p></li><li><p>the page number of the document where this information can be found</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 318,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 22,
      "companies": 133,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Access_to_Childcare_Services+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1830249,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Smallholders with Legal Titles to Natural Resources",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Smallholders_with_Legal_Titles_to_Natural_Resources.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Smallholders with Legal Titles to Natural Resources",
      "question": "What percentage of smallholders in the value chain of the company have secured legal titles to land (and/or other natural resources) on which they rely for their livelihoods?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers one of the requirements under [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf|PF indicator 16.5]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool.* It is part of the 4th Poverty Dimension, <em>stability and security</em>, which refers to enhancing conditions that improve resilience and lowers risks from violence, political instability, unrest, crime, and natural or human-made disasters. It includes access to vital resources (such as drinkable water and land) that are essential to stability, security, and resilience. More specifically, within this dimension, this particular indicator addresses the category <em>Access and Control Over Natural Resources, including Land, Water and Food Commodities</em>.</p><p>This indicator, furthermore, falls under the 1st Corporate area Dimension, <em>value chains</em>, which refers to how a company’s value chain and its procurement, manufacturing, and distribution policies and/or practices influence the ability of people living in poverty to access good-quality employment, earn a living wage or sustain a business, and participate in the market.</p><p><strong>Land rights</strong> refer to the inalienable ability of individuals to freely obtain, utilise, and possess land at their discretion, as long as their activities on the land do not impede on other individuals’ rights. This is not to be confused with access to land, which allows individuals the use of land in an economic sense (i.e. farming). Instead, land rights address the ownership of land which provides security and increases human capabilities. When a person only has access to land, they are in constant threat of expulsion depending on the choices of the land owner, which limits financial stability. (Source: [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_law| Wikipedia]] )</p><h6>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).</h6>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology:</p><ul><li><p>survey local authorities, local NGO/CSOs</p></li><li><p>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as:</p><ul><li><p>local resource endowments</p></li><li><p>resources entitlement (property rights, access, etc.)</p></li><li><p>food security in country/community of study</p></li></ul></li><li><p>consult with local stakeholders to identify which natural resources are critical to livelihoods (land, water and other productive assets) and any concerns due to the company’s presence in the area of study.</p></li></ul><p>However, Wikirate researchers may review one of the following company statements using search terms like \"access to land\", \"land rights\", and ''legal titles to land\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>the percentage of smallholders in the value chain who have secured legal titles to land*</strong>:</p><ul><li><p>Poverty Footprint</p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsiblity Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li></ul><p>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>any additional disclosure regarding land rights, e.g. policy statements, number of cases, types of legal titles, etc.</p></li><li><p>the page number of the document where this information can be found</p><p></p></li></ul><h6><strong>*If community livelihoods rely on forest, marshes, grassland or water (for fishing), provide the data on the legal access to these resources.</strong></h6>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Smallholders_with_Legal_Titles_to_Natural_Resources+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1830276,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Natural Resource Lobbying",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Natural_Resource_Lobbying.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Natural Resource Lobbying",
      "question": "Does the company engage with or influence trade groups, MSI/SIs, local/national/international authorities that address issues related to the use of water, land or other natural resources?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers one of the requirements under [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf|PF indicator 16.15]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool.* It is part of the 4th Poverty Dimension, <em>stability and security</em>, which refers to enhancing conditions that improve resilience and lowers risks from violence, political instability, unrest, crime, and natural or human-made disasters. It includes access to vital resources (such as drinkable water and land) that are essential to stability, security, and resilience. More specifically, within this dimension, this particular indicator addresses the category <em>Access and Control Over Natural Resources, including Land, Water and Food Commodities</em>.</p><p>This indicator, furthermore, falls under the 3rd Corporate area Dimension, <em>institutions and policy</em>, which refers to how the company’s actions regarding institutions and policy affect the well-being of people living in developing countries. It considers the effects of lobbying, direct investment, procurement and distribution practices in relation to the development of institutions (such as producer organizations, unions, social networks, women’s groups) and policies that focus on trade, finance, education, rule of law, and health.</p><p></p><h6>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).</h6>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology:</p><ul><li><p>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as:</p><ul><li><p>local resource endowments</p></li><li><p>resources entitlement (property rights, access, etc.)</p></li><li><p>food security in country/community of study</p></li></ul></li><li><p>consult with local stakeholders to identify which natural resources are critical to livelihoods (land, water and other productive assets) and any concerns due to the company’s presence in the area of study.</p></li></ul><p>However, Wikirate researchers may review one of the following company statements using search terms like \"local stakeholders\", \"natural resources\", \"negotiations\", and ''trade groups\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>if the company engages or influences trade groups, MSI/SIs, local/national/international authorities that address issues related to natural resources</strong>:</p><ul><li><p>Poverty Footprint</p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li></ul><p>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>any additional disclosure regarding engagements with local stakeholders, e.g. policy statements, types of stakeholders involved, specific topics of discussion, company's position(s), etc.</p></li><li><p>the page number of the document where the information can be found <br></p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Natural_Resource_Lobbying+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1830298,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Women in Management Positions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Women_in_Management_Positions.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Women in Management Positions",
      "question": "What percentage of management positions are filled by women?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers one of the requirements under [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf|PF indicator 20.1]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool.* It is part of the 5th Poverty Dimension, <em>gender and diversity</em>, which refers to equal access to jobs, training, advancement, benefits, and other rights for women and minorities, as well as opportunities to maintain cultural identity. Diversity and gender are cross-cutting themes that permeate into all other poverty indicators.** More specifically, within this dimension, this particular indicator addresses the category <em>Diversity, Cultural Rights and Right to Freedom from Discrimination.</em></p>\r\n<p>This indicator, furthermore, falls under the 3rd Corporate area Dimension, <em>institutions and policy</em>, which refers to how the company’s actions regarding institutions and policy affect the well-being of people living in developing countries. It considers the effects of lobbying, direct investment, procurement and distribution practices in relation to the development of institutions (such as producer organizations, unions, social networks, women’s groups) and policies that focus on trade, finance, education, rule of law, and health.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Researchers may find the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 1rem;\">the percentage of management positions filled by women</span> by reviewing <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">company statements for search terms like \"female representation\", \"female employees\", \"female workers\", \"women\", and ''gender diversity\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">this information.</span></p>\r\n<p>Likely sources of information: Annual Reports, CSR Reports, the company website.</p>\r\n<p>If found, cite the correct source and include the <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">page number </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">where the information can be found </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">and any additional context in the Comments field.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">The Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology for companies:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>survey management</li>\r\n<li>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>local patterns of discrimination (structural and informal)</li>\r\n<li>available gender analyses and gender impact studies</li>\r\n<li>country laws and rights that address vulnerable groups (e.g., indigenous peoples, women, etc.)</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5.5 Ensure women’s full participation and equal opportunities for leadership in political, economic, and public life."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2954,
      "bookmarkers": 18,
      "datasets": 92,
      "companies": 1112,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Female_workers_managers_differential.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Social_Metrics_Reported.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Sussex_Research_Group+Diversity_Inclusion_Disclosure.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Women_in_Management_Positions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1830318,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Percentage of Women in Skilled Positions (non-managerial)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Percentage_of_Women_in_Skilled_Positions_non_managerial.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Percentage of Women in Skilled Positions (non-managerial)",
      "question": "What percentage of skilled (non-management) positions is filled by women?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers one of the requirements under [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf|PF indicator 20.1]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool.* It is part of the 5th Poverty Dimension, gender and diversity, which refers to equal access to jobs, training, advancement, benefits, and other rights for women and minorities, as well as opportunities to maintain cultural identity. Diversity and gender are cross-cutting themes that permeate into all other poverty indicators.** More specifically, within this dimension, this particular indicator addresses the category Diversity, Cultural Rights and Right to Freedom from Discrimination.</p>\r\n<p>This indicator, furthermore, falls under the 3rd Corporate area Dimension, institutions and policy, which refers to how the company’s actions regarding institutions and policy affect the well-being of people living in developing countries. It considers the effects of lobbying, direct investment, procurement and distribution practices in relation to the development of institutions (such as producer organizations, unions, social networks, women’s groups) and policies that focus on trade, finance, education, rule of law, and health.</p>\r\n<p>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).</p>\r\n<p>**While ‘diversity and gender equality’ is listed as one of the five dimensions of poverty with its own poverty indicators, it is a topic that has relevance in the other four poverty dimensions (i.e., livelihoods, empowerment, security and stability and health and well-being). It is important to investigate and differentiate the company’s impacts on minority groups, women and other vulnerable groups, including indigenous peoples and youth, within each dimension. By integrating gender considerations throughout the framework, one obtains a complete picture of the company’s impact on its most vulnerable stakeholders.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>survey management</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>local patterns of discrimination (structural and informal)</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>available gender analyses and gender impact studies</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>country laws and rights that address vulnerable groups (e.g., indigenous peoples, women, etc.)</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>However, Wikirate researchers may review one of the following company statements using search terms like \"female representation\", \"female employees\", \"female workers\", \"women\", and ''gender diversity\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>the percentage of skilled (non-managment) positions filled by women</strong>:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Poverty Footprint</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Annual Report</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>CSO Statements or Reports</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>any additional disclosure regarding female representation in skilled positions, e.g. policy statements, number of cases, types of contracts, etc.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>the page number of the document where the information can be found</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>[[https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/finding-a-job/managerial-positions-vs-non-managerial-positions|Useful definitions by www.indeed.com]]</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 644,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 16,
      "companies": 358,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Percentage_of_Women_in_Skilled_Positions_non_managerial+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1830337,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Women in Unskilled Positions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Women_in_Unskilled_Positions.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Women in Unskilled Positions",
      "question": "What percentage of unskilled positions is filled by women?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers one of the requirements under [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf|PF indicator 20.1]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool.* It is part of the 5th Poverty Dimension, gender and diversity, which refers to equal access to jobs, training, advancement, benefits, and other rights for women and minorities, as well as opportunities to maintain cultural identity. Diversity and gender are cross-cutting themes that permeate into all other poverty indicators.** More specifically, within this dimension, this particular indicator addresses the category Diversity, Cultural Rights and Right to Freedom from Discrimination.<br><br>This indicator, furthermore, falls under the 3rd Corporate area Dimension, institutions and policy, which refers to how the company’s actions regarding institutions and policy affect the well-being of people living in developing countries. It considers the effects of lobbying, direct investment, procurement and distribution practices in relation to the development of institutions (such as producer organizations, unions, social networks, women’s groups) and policies that focus on trade, finance, education, rule of law, and health.<br><br>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).<br><br>**While ‘diversity and gender equality’ is listed as one of the five dimensions of poverty with its own poverty indicators, it is a topic that has relevance in the other four poverty dimensions (i.e., livelihoods, empowerment, security and stability and health and well-being). It is important to investigate and differentiate the company’s impacts on minority groups, women and other vulnerable groups, including indigenous peoples and youth, within each dimension. By integrating gender considerations throughout the framework, one obtains a complete picture of the company’s impact on its most vulnerable stakeholders.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology:</p><ul><li><p>survey management</p></li><li><p>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as:</p><ul><li><p>local patterns of discrimination (structural and informal)</p></li><li><p>available gender analyses and gender impact studies</p></li><li><p>country laws and rights that address vulnerable groups (e.g., indigenous peoples, women, etc.)</p></li></ul></li></ul><p>However, Wikirate researchers may review one of the following company statements using search terms like \"female representation\", \"female employees\", \"female workers\", \"women\", and ''gender diversity\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>the percentage of unskilled positions filled by women</strong>:</p><ul><li><p>Poverty Footprint</p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li></ul><p>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>any additional disclosure regarding female representation in unskilled positions, e.g. policy statements, number of cases, types of contracts, etc.</p></li><li><p>the page number of the document where the information can be found</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 520,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 10,
      "companies": 317,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Women_in_Unskilled_Positions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1830379,
      "name": "Poverty Footprint+Equal Opportunities Promotion",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Equal_Opportunities_Promotion.json",
      "designer": "Poverty Footprint",
      "title": "Equal Opportunities Promotion",
      "question": "Does the company have policies/programmes promoting equal opportunities (regardless of gender and other diversities) that explicitly extends to the entire value chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/PovertyFootprintIndicator.pdf|PF indicator 20.10]] of the Poverty Footprint Tool.* It is part of the 5th Poverty Dimension, <em>gender and diversity</em>, which refers to equal access to jobs, training, advancement, benefits, and other rights for women and minorities, as well as opportunities to maintain cultural identity. Diversity and gender are cross-cutting themes that permeate into all other poverty indicators.** More specifically, within this dimension, this particular indicator addresses the category <em>Diversity, Cultural Rights and Right to Freedom from Discrimination</em>.</p>\r\n<p>This indicator, furthermore, falls under the 1st Corporate area Dimension, <em>value chain</em>, which refers to how a company’s value chain and its procurement, manufacturing, and distribution policies and/or practices influence the ability of people living in poverty to access good-quality employment, earn a living wage or sustain a business, and participate in the market.</p>\r\n<p>*It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators).</p>\r\n<p>**While ‘diversity and gender equality’ is listed as one of the five dimensions of poverty with its own poverty indicators, it is a topic that has relevance in the other four poverty dimensions (i.e., livelihoods, empowerment, security and stability and health and well-being). It is important to investigate and differentiate the company’s impacts on minority groups, women and other vulnerable groups, including indigenous peoples and youth, within each dimension. By integrating gender considerations throughout the framework, one obtains a complete picture of the company’s impact on its most vulnerable stakeholders.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For project partners who have set out to research this indicator, the Poverty Footprint guideline suggests the following methodology:</p><ul><li><p>consider using secondary research to identify topics such as</p><ul><li><p>local patterns of discrimination (structural and informal)</p></li><li><p>available gender analyses and gender impact studies</p></li><li><p>country laws and rights that address vulnerable groups (e.g., indigenous peoples, women, etc.)</p></li></ul></li></ul><p>However, Wikirate researchers may review one of the following company statements using search terms like \"equality\", \"equal rights\", \"equal opportunities\", \"anti-discrimination\", and ''promoting diversity\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses <strong>if it has policies/programmes that promote equal opportunities, and that apply to their entire value chain</strong>:</p><ul><li><p>Poverty Footprint</p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li></ul><p>Please provide the following contextual information in a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>any additional disclosure regarding promoting equal opportunities, e.g. policy statements, number of programmes, types of programmes, etc.</p></li><li><p>the page number of the document where the information can be found</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 78,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 71,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Poverty_Footprint+Equal_Opportunities_Promotion+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1831852,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+MSA statement signed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+MSA_statement_signed.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "MSA statement signed",
      "question": "Was the company’s Modern Slavery Act statement signed by an appropriate person?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The MSA requires that the statements are discussed at senior management level and signed by an appropriate senior member of the company (dependent on the type of company it is).<br><br>For further information on signing the statement, please read the <a href=\"https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf\">Home Office Guidance, page 13</a>.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Each statement should be signed by an appropriate senior member of the company. <strong>It does not require a physical signature, but the name of the person who has 'signed' the statement</strong>. These signatures are usually found at the beginning or the end of the document. This metric is asking who signed the company's statement.</p>\r\n<p>The title and name of the individual who has 'signed' should be displayed. The possible values for this metric are as follows:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong>Signed by CEO</strong></p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong>Signed by Director</strong></p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong>Signed by Managing Director</strong></p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong>Signed by Chairman</strong></p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong>Signed by other role</strong> - where there is a signature by a named individual whose role is not covered by one of the above options. Please add a comment with the title of the individual who signed.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong>Signed - no title</strong> - where there is a signature by a named individual but no description of their role. Please add a comment with the name of the individual who signed.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong>Not signed</strong> - where no individual has signed the statement.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>NOTE: Signature is not the same as approval- this is covered under the metric </strong>[[http://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+MSA_Statement_Approval|MSA Statement Approval]]</p>\r\n<p>If the statement is signed by more than one person, please prioritise the following roles in your selection: CEO, Director, Managing Director, or Chairman. If it is signed by multiple people with any of those titles, please select one.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Signed by CEO",
        "Signed by Director",
        "Signed by Managing Director",
        "Signed by Chairman",
        "Signed by other role",
        "Signed - no title",
        "Not signed"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9273,
      "bookmarkers": 10,
      "datasets": 78,
      "companies": 7358,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+MSA_statement_signed_binary.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_UK_MSA_Requirements.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+MSA_statement_signed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1831874,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_policy.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA policy",
      "question": "Does the company’s statement detail their policies to tackle modern slavery?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>MSA encourages businesses to have policies which detail how they respond to modern slavery in their business and supply chain. This metric is a general question regarding these policies and can include general human rights policies, recruitment policies, and procurement policies.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Where the policies are described in the document please select <strong>“Yes”</strong>, and add a comment which either summarises these or copies and pastes them. Where the statement references external documents, please add these as sources on Wikirate and also cite them. If no policies are listed, please select <strong>“No”</strong>. If the business indicates it is developing a modern slavery policy or planning to implement one in the future, please indicate <strong>“In Development”</strong>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "In Development"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1831886,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA policy applies to supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_policy_applies_to_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA policy applies to supply chain",
      "question": "Does the company’s statement detail policies to combat slavery in their supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>Does the company’s statement detail specific policies relating to their supply chains? These policies can apply to their direct supply chain, or apply to their entire supply chain (through subcontractors etc). Policies can include:</p><ol><li><p>requiring all suppliers and contractors to comply with local laws, international law, and company’s policies,</p></li><li><p>prohibiting contractors or suppliers from using forced labour, involuntary labour, debt bondage or human trafficking,</p></li><li><p>can terminate contract based on violation of supplier code, or violation of modern slavery policies,</p></li><li><p>requiring all contracts to include clauses on forced labour or supply chains, or</p></li><li><p>requiring all suppliers to produce their own statement on modern slavery and forced labour.</p></li></ol><p>For further information on policies use the <a href=\"https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf\">Home Office Guidance, Pg 28-30</a></p><p>If the company has a mechanism in place that ensures their policies are adhered to by “direct” or “tier 1” suppliers, they should receive the<strong> “Tier 1”</strong> value. If the company has a mechanism in place through which their policies “cascade” down the supply chain (e.g. by requiring direct suppliers to ensure that their suppliers also adhere to the company’s relevant policies) they should receive the <strong>“Beyond Tier 1”</strong> value. Unless there is specific mention of a mechanism through which the company's policies are applied to suppliers beyond Tier 1, they should receive the \"<strong>Tier 1</strong>\" value. </p><p>If no such policy exists, then please select <strong>“No”</strong>. Please include a comment that copies relevant information from the statement. If the business indicates it is developing a modern slavery supply chain policy or planning to implement one in the future, please indicate <strong>“In Development”</strong>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Tier 1",
        "Beyond Tier 1",
        "In Development",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 35,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 33,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_policy_applies_to_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1831908,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA supply chain disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_supply_chain_disclosure.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA supply chain disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company’s statement name the suppliers in their supply chain and/or the geographic regions where their supply chain operates?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Most companies reporting under the UK Modern Slavery Act would have complex supply chains covering many countries and suppliers. It is therefore important that a company <em>identifies or maps</em> out their supply chain. Disclosing all suppliers and geographic regions within a modern slavery statement illustrates that a company is serious about assessing risks within their supply chain.</p>\r\n<p><br>For further information on disclosure of supply chains please refer to the [[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf|Home Office Guidance, page 27]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Does the company’s statement <strong>identify the suppliers</strong> or <strong>outline the country or geographic regions</strong> where its suppliers are based? This can include a list of the names of suppliers, or list of the specific countries or regions where goods are sourced. Some company statements include graphs or pie charts indicating where their company supply chain is based.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Please note this metric requires a list of the names of countries and/or suppliers, not a statement outlining the total number of countries or suppliers.</strong></p>\r\n<p>If the company specifies at least one region, country or area that feeds into their supply chain, the answer should be <strong>“Geographical”</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>If the company discloses a list of suppliers, the answer should be<strong> “Facility/Supplier”</strong>. If a company provides an active hyperlink to a list of named suppliers that is also sufficient for this answer option.</p>\r\n<p>If the company specifies both a region, country or area <strong>AND</strong> a list of suppliers, then please select both values, <strong>“Geographical”</strong> and <strong>“Facility/Supplier”.</strong></p>\r\n<p>If no such disclosure exists, then please select<strong> “No”</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>If companies identify production sites that are part of their own operations, those sites/factories are not considered to be suppliers.</p>\r\n<p>Please include a comment that copies relevant information from the statement.</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for “Geographical” value|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for “Facility/Supplier” value|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<p><br>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018<br>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Geographical",
        "Facility/Supplier",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3988,
      "bookmarkers": 14,
      "datasets": 80,
      "companies": 2358,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_supply_chain_disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1831920,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Risk Management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Risk_Management.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Risk Management",
      "question": "Does the statement describe how the company has assessed the risks of modern slavery and trafficking in their supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company has taken steps to figure out where in its operations or supply chain the risk of slavery or forced labour is highest. This can include:</p><p>a) questionnaires of new suppliers,</p><p>b) a risk management database or tool (collating secondary data relevant to risk), or</p><p>c) independent research assessing risk. <br><br>For further information on Risk Management please refer to the <a href=\"https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf\">Home Office Guidance on page 34-35</a>.</p><p>Where there are no details of risk management, please give a <strong>“No” </strong>value. If there is a description, please give the company a <strong>“Yes”</strong> value and include a comment describing the tools/approach used. If the business indicates it is developing risk management tools specific to modern slavery or planning to implement one in the future, please indicate <strong>“In Development” </strong>and again include a comment describing the tools being developed.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No",
        "Yes",
        "In Development"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 38,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 37,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Risk_Management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1831932,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Identification of risks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Identification_of_risks.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Identification of risks",
      "question": "Does the company’s statement identify specific geographic regions (e.g. Indonesia), industries (e.g. agriculture), resources (e.g. Palm Oil) or types of workforce (e.g. migrant workers) where the risk of modern slavery is the greatest?\"",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Understanding where the risk of modern slavery occurs, and assessing its level of importance, ensures that companies <em>are able to</em> put the most appropriate remedies in place. Disclosing in a modern slavery statement where this risk is helps to illustrate the effectiveness of risk assessment tools outlined in the previous metric.</p>\r\n<p>For further information on this metric please refer to the [[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf|Home Office Guidance on page 34-35]] and [[http://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/business.walkfreefoundation.org-assets/content/uploads/2016/09/08101240/TacklingModernSlaveryInSupplyChains20141-1.pdf|Walk Free Foundation Guidance, pp.18-19]].</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Does the company’s statement <strong>identify the greatest risks</strong> of modern slavery in its organisation and supply chain? The company must explicitly state the specific geographic regions, industries, resources or types of workforce where the risk is greatest.</p>\r\n<p>The answer to this metric question may thus be one or several of these options:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong>Geographic</strong> - exposure may be greater in countries where protection against breaches of human rights are limited, particularly for migrant workers.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong>Industry</strong> - certain industries are more at risk of modern slavery than others. For example, those working in the extractives industry may differ to the risk in manufacturing. Risks linked to industries are of a more general nature than risks linked to specific resources, products or services.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong>Resource, products and services</strong> - some resources, products and services<span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\"> are more associated with modern slavery than others. For example, the extraction of mica or palm oil has been associated with high levels of debt bondage.</span> Adult care services have been linked to rising modern slavery risks.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong>Workforce</strong> - some workers are more vulnerable to modern slavery than others. For example, temporary, seasonal or migrant workers may not be covered by local labour laws, or may not be as aware of their rights. Prisoners are also vulnerable to modern slavery. </p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p>Please note this metric requires an explicit statement of the risk and where it occurs, it cannot apply to general statements about high levels of risk. Statements of a general nature are accepted, as long as the risks and the specific geographic regions, industries, resources/products/services or types of workforce are identified.</p>\r\n<p>If a company lists countries or geographic regions (such as South Asia) where the risk of modern slavery is high, please select the <strong>“Geographic”</strong> value.</p>\r\n<p>If a company identifies specific industries (such as the mining or apparel industry) where the risk of modern slavery is high, please select the <strong>“Industry”</strong> value.</p>\r\n<p>If a company identifies specific resources (such as mica or palm oil) as being associated with modern slavery, please select the <strong>“Resource”</strong> value.</p>\r\n<p>If a company describes a specific type of worker that is vulnerable to modern slavery, please select the <strong>“Workforce”</strong> value.</p>\r\n<p><strong>***Please select as many values as apply.***</strong></p>\r\n<p>If the business indicates if it will identify risks specific to modern slavery or is planning to do so in the future, please indicate <strong>“In Development”.</strong></p>\r\n<p>Where there are no details of specific risks, please give a <strong>“No” </strong>value.</p>\r\n<p>For each value, please include a comment that copies relevant information from the statement.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>{{Example of <strong>“Geographic”</strong> value|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p>{{Example of <strong>“Industry”</strong> value|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p>{{Example of <strong>“Resource”</strong> value|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p>{{Example of <strong>“Workforce”</strong> value|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<p>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018<br>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": "{\r\n  \"Geographic\": \"Geographic\",\r\n  \"Industry\": \"Industry\",\r\n  \"Resource/products and services\": \"Resource\",\r\n  \"Workforce\": \"Workforce\",\r\n  \"In Development\": \"In Development\",\r\n  \"No\": \"No\"\r\n}",
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4023,
      "bookmarkers": 14,
      "datasets": 84,
      "companies": 2376,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Identification_of_risks_binary.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Identification_of_risks_grouped.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_risk_assessment_risk_identified_binary.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Identification_of_risks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1831952,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Continuous engagement with suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Continuous_engagement_with_suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Continuous engagement with suppliers",
      "question": "Does the company continuously engage with suppliers to ensure that they comply with the company’s policies and local laws?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": "<p>Part of due diligence processes is not just assessing initial risk through questionnaires or having in place policies, but monitoring this risk through continuous engagement with suppliers. This can be done through:</p><ol><li><p>conducting audits of suppliers (including high risk suppliers), either by the company itself or through external agencies,</p></li><li><p>providing suppliers with continuous improvement programs,</p></li><li><p>providing suppliers with correction action plans, or equivalent,</p></li><li><p>conducting on site visits of suppliers, either by the company itself or through external agencies</p></li></ol><p>For further information on this metric please refer to the <a href=\"http://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/business.walkfreefoundation.org-assets/content/uploads/2016/09/08101240/TacklingModernSlaveryInSupplyChains20141-1.pdf\">Walk Free Foundation Guidance, page 37 - 39</a>, and the <a href=\"https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf\">Home Office Guidance, page 32 - 33</a>.</p><p>Where a company details policies or mechanisms to monitor due diligence, please give <strong>“Yes”</strong> value. Please provide detail on the types of policies that are listed, be it audits, on site visits or continuous improvement programs. Where no mention of audits is made, please select <strong>“No”</strong>. If the business indicates it is developing a continuous engagement policy or planning to implement one in the future, please indicate <strong>“In Development”</strong>. Again, please provide detail on the types of processes which are in development</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "In Development"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 38,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 37,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Continuous_engagement_with_suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1831964,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA incidents identified",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_incidents_identified.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA incidents identified",
      "question": "Has the company identified at least one incident related to modern slavery risks?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Given the size of the problem and the complex and far-reaching nature of the supply chains of large companies, it is perhaps not surprising that incidents of modern slavery in supply chains can be common. Companies should present an accurate picture rather than seeking to cover up problems. Revealing these incidents in their statements shows business partners and consumers that companies are taking the issue seriously, and have effective risk assessment strategies in place.</p>\r\n<p>For further information on this metric please refer to the [[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf|Home Office Guidance, pp. 32-36]], and [[http://corporate-responsibility.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/CSO_TISC_guidance_final_digitalversion_16.03.16.pdf|CORE Guidance, pp. 22]].</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Has the company identified at least one incident related to modern slavery risks?</p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">‘Incident’ (violations, non-compliances) is defined as a case study or description of any case of violation of the company policies or local laws involving an individual or group of individuals. Companies can identify different types of violations, ranging from modern slavery cases to other types of incidents, such as health and safety or payment of recruitment fees. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Because definitions of modern slavery vary, incidents described in modern slavery statements (e.g. recruitment fees) do not always qualify as cases of modern slavery or forced labour, even though they are often considered as indicators or risk factors. This is why we are trying to capture the different categories of incidents disclosed by companies. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Please note, the incident </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">must refer to a specific example</span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">, not a general description of risk, which is covered by the metric 'MSA Identification of risks'. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">DO NOT select the answer \"No\" together with another answer. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">The answer options are the following: </span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Modern slavery</span><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">: cases of forced labour, child labour, state-imposed forced labour. </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">The statement must refer to cases of modern slavery that the company recognizes as such, not to cases in which the company has identified a risk of modern slavery. </span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Recruitment fees</span><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">: cases in which workers paid fees to agencies or brokers for recruitment and placement in jobs, abuse of debt, and deposits.</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Freedom of movement and association: </span><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">passport confiscation, restrictions on freedom of movement, confinement at workplace, prohibition of workers association. </span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Wages and benefits</span><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">: underpayment, withholding of wages, unpaid overtime, wages under the legal minimum or living wage level, and wage deductions. </span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Working Hours: </span><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">working hours above the legal maximum, excessive</span><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">overtime, mandatory overtime. </span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Working conditions</span><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">: hazardous/unsafe conditions, health issues caused by work, workplace abuse and harassment.</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Other incidents: </span><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">data protection, discrimination, or incidents that are mentioned but not described</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;\">No: </span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;\">If the company did not identify any incidents</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;\">There is no relevant information in the statement</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">If the company reports incidents but categorizes them so broadly that it is not possible to know in ehcih category theu fit (e.g. Human Rights issues, labor practices). </span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">If the company states clearly that an alleged incident was unfounded. </span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>{{Example for <strong>“Yes” </strong>value|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": "{\r\n  \"Modern slavery\": \"Yes\",\r\n  \"Recruitment fees\": \"Recruitment fees\",\r\n  \"Freedom of movement\": \"Freedom of movement\",\r\n  \"Wages and benefits\": \"Wages and benefits\",\r\n  \"Working Hours\": \"Working Hours\",\r\n  \"Working conditions\": \"Working conditions\",\r\n  \"Other incidents\": \"Other incidents\",\r\n  \"No\": \"No\"\r\n}",
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4007,
      "bookmarkers": 8,
      "datasets": 84,
      "companies": 2375,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+AUS_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_incidents_identified+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1831976,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA incidents remediation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_incidents_remediation.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA incidents remediation",
      "question": "Did the company explain the corrective steps it has taken (or would take) in response to identified problems or incidents?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Has the company outlined a process through which if a supplier is found to be engaging in any activities related to modern slavery or human trafficking, the supplier is subject to consequences set out by the company. Does the company flag such issues to senior management, take action to correct the behaviour (through Corrective Action Plans for example) or cancel the supplier’s contract? This is not necessarily reliant on metric 11- companies can not have identified a case of modern slavery, but still have remediation policies in place.<br><br>For further information on Corrective Action please refer to the <a href=\"http://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/business.walkfreefoundation.org-assets/content/uploads/2016/09/08101240/TacklingModernSlaveryInSupplyChains20141-1.pdf\">Walk Free Foundation Guidance, page 31 - 34.</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric not necessarily reliant on 'MSA incidents identified'- even if a company has not have identified a case of modern slavery, they can still have remediation policies in place and describe these. Where the company has identified at least one incident of slavery, this question can be answered in relation to their response to those incidents. Where the company has not identified any incidents of slavery, this question should be answered on the basis of whether they describe a clear plan for re-mediating such incidents should they be identified in future. Please respond <strong>“Yes”</strong>/ <strong>”No” </strong>as appropriate and include a comment that copies relevant information from the statement. If the business indicates it is developing a remediation policy or planning to implement one in the future, please indicate<strong> “In Development” </strong>and again provide details in the comment.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "In Development"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 35,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 34,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_incidents_remediation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1831988,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Whistleblowing mechanism",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Whistleblowing_mechanism.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Whistleblowing mechanism",
      "question": "Does the company have a grievance mechanism in place to facilitate whistle-blowing or the reporting of suspected incidents of slavery or trafficking? If so, is this grievance or whistleblowing mechanism provided for direct employees, or does it extend to workers within the company’s supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The provision of a hotline or other grievance mechanism for reporting suspected incidents of slavery or trafficking is one step that a company can take to find out about such incidents in their own operations or in their supply chain. For many companies the risk of forced labour is much greater within their supply chain than in their own operations - and as such the provision of a mechanism that extends to workers within the company’s supply chain is regarded as a positive step.<br><br>For further information on grievance mechanisms please refer to the <a href=\"http://corporate-responsibility.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/CSO_TISC_guidance_final_digitalversion_16.03.16.pdf\">CORE Guidance, page 19</a>.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This mechanism may be described as a hotline or approach to grievance reporting. Where a mechanism is described but the intended users of the mechanism are direct employees or are not specified, the answer should assume that the mechanism is aimed at<strong> “Employees”</strong>. If the company provides such a mechanism to workers within the company’s supply chain, and takes steps to make these workers aware of its availability, the answer should be<strong> “Supply chain workers”.</strong> If the company provides a mechanism for employees <strong>AND</strong> supply chains workers, please select<strong> \"Employees and Supply Chain Workers\". </strong>Please include a comment that copies relevant information from the statement. If the business indicates it is developing a whistleblowing or grievance mechanism or planning to implement one in the future, please indicate<strong> “In Development” </strong>and again give details in the comments section. Please select <strong>\"No\" </strong>if no whistleblowing mechanism is described in the statement.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No",
        "Employees",
        "Supply Chain Workers",
        "In Development",
        "Employees and Supply Chain Workers"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 36,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 35,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Whistleblowing_mechanism+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1832012,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Business Performance Indicators",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Business_Performance_Indicators.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Business Performance Indicators",
      "question": "Has the company reviewed business KPIs to ensure they are not increasing risk of modern slavery? (E.g. expansion to production countries that have a lot of migrant workers)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Business Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) can affect the level of risk and how exposed a company is to modern slavery. Companies can provide information in their statements on their existing business KPIs and explain if they have considered whether these KPIs make their business and supply chain more (or less) vulnerable to modern slavery. <br><br>For further information on Business Performance Indicators please refer to [[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf|Home Office Guidance, pp. 36]].</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Does the company <strong>disclose existing business KPIs</strong> that may increase their exposure to the risk of modern slavery?</p>\r\n<p>Examples of these business KPIs include:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>turn-around time,</li>\r\n<li>expansion to new production countries,</li>\r\n<li>the cost of materials, or</li>\r\n<li>efficiency in production.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Business KPIs that increase the risk of modern slavery could be sourcing the cheapest goods in the shortest amount of time, for example.</p>\r\n<p>Select:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Yes.</strong> The company explicitly states having reviewed business (not modern slavery) performance indicators (usually economic led indicators) that might increase risks of Modern Slavery or are incompatible with their modern slavery strategy. Provide details in the comments.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><strong>In Development. </strong>The company indicates it is planning to identify these KPIs in the future. I</span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">nclude any relevant details.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>No</strong>. The company:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Discloses no such KPIs</li>\r\n<li>Mentions it will review its performance for the next report</li>\r\n<li>Mentions it has consulted its subsidiaries or committees or other groups to produce this report</li>\r\n<li>Actions taken to address modern slavery risks</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<div style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"> </div>\r\n<p>{{Example of a <strong>“Yes” </strong>value:|<span style=\"color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;\">closed_bar</span>}}</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "In Development",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3923,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 78,
      "companies": 2342,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+AUS_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_KPIs_combined.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Business_Performance_Indicators+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1832024,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Performance Indicators",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Performance_Indicators.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Performance Indicators",
      "question": "Does the modern slavery statement define the performance indicators against which the company measures the effectiveness of its actions to combat slavery and trafficking? E.g. number of audits done, number of employee training provided",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Modern slavery Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) can help companies measure and track the impact of their policies and due diligence addressing modern slavery. Within their statements, companies can provide information on KPIs they have or will introduce to monitor the performance of future and ongoing anti-slavery actions taken by the company.</p>\r\n<p>For further information on performance indicators please refer to the [[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf|Home Office Guidance, pp. 36]].</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Does the company <strong>measure the impact </strong>of the actions it takes to combat modern slavery?</p>\r\n<p>Relevant KPIs can include:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Any KPIs measuring the impact of training provided to staff on modern slavery,</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Any KPIs related to usage of whistleblowing mechanisms outlined under MSA Whistleblowing</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Any KPIs related to number of incidents identified</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Any KPIs related to remediation- number of contracts cancelled, or number of corrective action plans</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>KPIs related to number of audits, on site visits, <em>suppliers</em> questionnaires, or other labour monitoring mechanisms, etc.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p>Select:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Yes</strong>. The company discloses any of the above or related KPIs or other measures regarding the companies actions to tackle modern slavery. Key words can include, \"measure\", \"review\", \"monitor\", \"track progress\" etc. It is not sufficient if the company mentions it has KPIs, but does not describe these. </li>\r\n<li><strong>In Development. </strong>The company indicates it is planning to implement modern slavery KPIs. Include details on the proposed KPIs.</li>\r\n<li><strong>No.</strong> No such KPIs exist or are described in the statement<strong>. </strong>For example, if the company:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Describes no such KPIs in the statement.</li>\r\n<li>Only describes any awards/recognitions won, entering rankings lists, etc.</li>\r\n<li>Only mentions identifying indicators of modern slavery, but not related to assessing the effectiveness of their interventions.</li>\r\n<li>Only uses indicators of modern slavery to identify modern slavery cases. </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>{{Example for a “Yes” value|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for a \"No\" value in Performance Indicators|view: closed }}</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "In Development",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3926,
      "bookmarkers": 7,
      "datasets": 78,
      "companies": 2342,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_KPIs_combined.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Performance_Indicators+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1837379,
      "name": "theresah+Pregnancy and maternity rights policies (G3-AF27)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/theresah+Pregnancy_and_maternity_rights_policies_G3_AF27.json",
      "designer": "theresah",
      "title": "Pregnancy and maternity rights policies (G3-AF27)",
      "question": "Does the company report policies or actions to protect the pregnancy and maternity rights of women workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative's (GRI) Sustainability Reporting Guidelines &amp; Apparel and Footwear Sector Supplement, pilot version. It covers the requirements of Indicator AF27, from the aspect: diversity and equal opportunity, \"Policy and actions to protect the pregnancy and maternity rights of women workers.\"</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This question relates to issues such as pregnancy testing, forced abortions, women’s health, and child care leave. The disclosure also intends to capture systems and practices to take into account the special circumstances of pregnant women, such as, but not limited to: emergency response; chemical use; work/work station adjustment.</p><p>Select \"yes\" if the company reports that it has a policy or action to protect the pregnancy and maternity rights of women workers, and \"no\" if no such policy is reported.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 7,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/theresah+Pregnancy_and_maternity_rights_policies_G3_AF27+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1840169,
      "name": "UO SPM+Code of Conduct Training",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/UO_SPM+Code_of_Conduct_Training.json",
      "designer": "UO SPM",
      "title": "Code of Conduct Training",
      "question": "Do employees receive code of conduct training?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/UO_SPM+Code_of_Conduct_Training+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1840218,
      "name": "UO SPM+Non-preferred chemicals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/UO_SPM+Non_preferred_chemicals.json",
      "designer": "UO SPM",
      "title": "Non-preferred chemicals",
      "question": "What is the amount of non-preferred chemicals removed from the supply chain? in tons",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/UO_SPM+Non_preferred_chemicals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1884089,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Revenue",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Revenue.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Revenue",
      "question": "What is the company's aggregated revenue recognized during the period (derived from goods sold, services rendered, insurance premiums, or other activities that constitute an entity's earning process)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Aggregate revenue recognized during the period (derived from goods sold, services rendered, insurance premiums, or other activities that constitute an entity's earning process). For financial services companies, also includes investment and interest income, and sales and trading gains.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 201 - Economic Performance",
        "GRI Standards+201-1 Direct economic value generated and distributed",
        "GRI Standards+201-1-a-i Direct economic value generated: revenues"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 33886,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 4271,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Revenue.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Annual_Revenue.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Revenue+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1903323,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Undistributed Earnings of Foreign Subsidiaries",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Undistributed_Earnings_of_Foreign_Subsidiaries.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Undistributed Earnings of Foreign Subsidiaries",
      "question": "What is the company's undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8154,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 1496,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Undistributed_Earnings_of_Foreign_Subsidiaries+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1908858,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Assets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Assets.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Assets",
      "question": "What is the company's sum of the carrying amounts as of the balance sheet date of all assets that are recognized?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Sum of the carrying amounts as of the balance sheet date of all assets that are recognized. Assets are probable future economic benefits obtained or controlled by an entity as a result of past transactions or events.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 68575,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 6368,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Assets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1931162,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Good Will",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Good_Will.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Good Will",
      "question": "What is the company's good will?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Carrying amount as of the balance sheet date, which is the cumulative amount paid and (if applicable) the fair value of any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, adjusted for any amortization recognized prior to the adoption of any changes in generally accepted accounting principles (as applicable) and for any impairment charges, in excess of the fair value of net assets acquired in one or more business combination transactions.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 39968,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 4096,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Good_Will+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1994390,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Deferred Tax Liabilities Undistributed Foreign Earnings",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Deferred_Tax_Liabilities_Undistributed_Foreign_Earnings.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Deferred Tax Liabilities Undistributed Foreign Earnings",
      "question": "What is the company's deferred tax liabilities undistributed foreign earnings?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The amount as of the balance sheet date of the estimated future tax effects attributable to undistributed earnings of subsidiaries and other recognized entities in countries outside the country of domicile which will increase future taxable income when such earnings are distributed into the country of domicile.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5253,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 848,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Deferred_Tax_Liabilities_Undistributed_Foreign_Earnings+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 1998302,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Unrecognized Tax Benefits that would impact Effective Tax Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Unrecognized_Tax_Benefits_that_would_impact_Effective_Tax_Rate.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Unrecognized Tax Benefits that would impact Effective Tax Rate",
      "question": "What are the company's unrecognized tax benefits that would impact effective tax rate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19434,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 2286,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Unrecognized_Tax_Benefits_that_would_impact_Effective_Tax_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2017735,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Comprehensive Income Net of Tax",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Comprehensive_Income_Net_of_Tax.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Comprehensive Income Net of Tax",
      "question": "What is the company's comprehensive income net of tax?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The change in equity [net assets] of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources which are attributable to the reporting entity. It includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners, but excludes any and all transactions which are directly or indirectly attributable to that ownership interest in subsidiary equity which is not attributable to the parent.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48191,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 4651,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Comprehensive_Income_Net_of_Tax+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2035485,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Current Income Tax Expense Benefit",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Current_Income_Tax_Expense_Benefit.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Current Income Tax Expense Benefit",
      "question": "What is the company's income tax expense?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The component of income tax expense for the period representing amounts of income taxes paid or payable (or refundable) for the period for all income tax obligations as determined by applying the provisions of relevant enacted tax laws to relevant amounts of taxable Income or Loss from continuing operations.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 40189,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 3984,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Domestic_Income_Tax_Expense_Benefit.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Current_Income_Tax_Expense_Benefit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2050831,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Net Income Attributable to the company",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Net_Income_Attributable_to_the_company.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Net Income Attributable to the company",
      "question": "What is the company's portion of profit or loss?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The portion of profit or loss for the period, net of income taxes, which is attributable to the parent.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.<br> For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 68951,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 6195,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Net_Income_Attributable_to_the_company+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2070638,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Net Income",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Net_Income.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Net Income",
      "question": "What is the company's consolidated profit or loss, including the portion attributable to the noncontrolling interest?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The consolidated profit or loss for the period, net of income taxes, including the portion attributable to the noncontrolling interest.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 32336,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 3802,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Return_on_Equity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Net_Income+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2082367,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Effective Federal Income Tax Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Effective_Federal_Income_Tax_Rate.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Effective Federal Income Tax Rate",
      "question": "What is the company's domestic federal statutory tax rate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The domestic federal statutory tax rate applicable under enacted tax laws to the Company's pretax income from continuing operations for the period. The \"statutory\" tax rate is the regular tax rate if there are alternative tax systems.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5834,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 966,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Effective_Federal_Income_Tax_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2096465,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Deferred Income Tax Expense Benefit",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Deferred_Income_Tax_Expense_Benefit.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Deferred Income Tax Expense Benefit",
      "question": "What is the company's deferred income tax expense?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The component of income tax expense for the period representing the increase (decrease) in the entity's deferred tax assets and liabilities pertaining to continuing operations.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48189,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 4558,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Deferred_Income_Tax_Expense_Benefit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2118859,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Income Loss From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes Foreign",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Income_Loss_From_Continuing_Operations_Before_Income_Taxes_Foreign.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Income Loss From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes Foreign",
      "question": "What is the company's portion of earnings or loss from continuing operations before income taxes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The portion of earnings or loss from continuing operations before income taxes that is attributable to foreign operations, which is defined as Income or Loss generated from operations located outside the entity's country of domicile.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24018,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 2330,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Income_Loss_From_Continuing_Operations_Before_Income_Taxes_Foreign+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2132092,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Cost of Goods Sold",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Cost_of_Goods_Sold.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Cost of Goods Sold",
      "question": "What is the company's cost of goods sold?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Total costs related to goods produced and sold during the reporting period.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 201 - Economic Performance",
        "GRI Standards+201-1 Direct economic value generated and distributed",
        "GRI Standards+201-1-a-ii Economic value distributed: operating costs, employee wages and benefits, payments to providers of capital, payments to government by country, and community investments"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12027,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 1793,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Cost_of_Goods_Sold+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2140514,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Current Foreign Tax Expense Benefit",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Current_Foreign_Tax_Expense_Benefit.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Current Foreign Tax Expense Benefit",
      "question": "What is the company's income tax expense representing amounts paid as determined by applying the provisions of foreign enacted tax law to the foreign taxable Income or Loss from continuing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The component of income tax expense for the period representing amounts paid or payable (or refundable) as determined by applying the provisions of foreign enacted tax law to the foreign taxable Income or Loss from continuing operations.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 26978,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 2641,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Domestic_Income_Tax_Expense_Benefit.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Current_Foreign_Tax_Expense_Benefit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2153131,
      "name": "The International Council on Clean Transportation+Fuel efficiency: passenger kilometres per liter",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/The_International_Council_on_Clean_Transportation+Fuel_efficiency_passenger_kilometres_per_liter.json",
      "designer": "The International Council on Clean Transportation",
      "title": "Fuel efficiency: passenger kilometres per liter",
      "question": "What is the companies fuel efficiency in passenger kilometers per liter?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/The_International_Council_on_Clean_Transportation+Fuel_efficiency_passenger_kilometres_per_liter+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2157693,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Cost of Goods and Services Sold",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Cost_of_Goods_and_Services_Sold.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Cost of Goods and Services Sold",
      "question": "What is the aggregate costs related to goods produced and sold and services?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The aggregate costs related to goods produced and sold and services rendered by an entity during the reporting period. This excludes costs incurred during the reporting period related to financial services rendered and other revenue generating activities.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 201 - Economic Performance",
        "GRI Standards+201-1 Direct economic value generated and distributed",
        "GRI Standards+201-1-a-ii Economic value distributed: operating costs, employee wages and benefits, payments to providers of capital, payments to government by country, and community investments"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 17652,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 2275,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Cost_of_Goods_and_Services_Sold+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2162718,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Net Income Attributable to Non Controlling Interest",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Net_Income_Attributable_to_Non_Controlling_Interest.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Net Income Attributable to Non Controlling Interest",
      "question": "What is the company's portion of net Income or Loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The portion of net Income or Loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest (if any) deducted in order to derive the portion attributable to the parent.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19654,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 2355,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Net_Income_Attributable_to_Non_Controlling_Interest+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2172335,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Advertising Expense",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Advertising_Expense.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Advertising Expense",
      "question": "What is the company's advertising expense?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Amount charged to advertising expense for the period, which are expenses incurred with the objective of increasing revenue for a specified brand, product or product line.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20094,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 2256,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Advertising_Expense+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2179277,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Effective Income Tax Rate Continuing Operations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Effective_Income_Tax_Rate_Continuing_Operations.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Effective Income Tax Rate Continuing Operations",
      "question": "What is the company's calculated ratio of income tax expense to pretax income?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>A ratio calculated by dividing the reported amount of income tax expense attributable to continuing operations for the period by GAAP-basis pretax income from continuing operations.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 36901,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 3917,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Effective_Income_Tax_Rate_Continuing_Operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2192045,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Unrecognized Tax Benefits Reductions Resulting from Lapse of Applicable statute of Limitations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Unrecognized_Tax_Benefits_Reductions_Resulting_from_Lapse_of_Applicable_statute_of_Limitations.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Unrecognized Tax Benefits Reductions Resulting from Lapse of Applicable statute of Limitations",
      "question": "What is the company's gross amount of decreases in unrecognized tax benefits resulting from lapses of the applicable statutes of limitations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The gross amount of decreases in unrecognized tax benefits resulting from lapses of the applicable statutes of limitations.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19327,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 2198,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Unrecognized_Tax_Benefits_Reductions_Resulting_from_Lapse_of_Applicable_statute_of_Limitations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2204459,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Research and Development Expense",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Research_and_Development_Expense.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Research and Development Expense",
      "question": "What is the company's aggregated costs regarding research and development?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The aggregate costs incurred (1) in a planned search or critical investigation aimed at discovery of new knowledge with the hope that such knowledge will be useful in developing a new product or service, a new process or technique, or in bringing about a significant improvement to an existing product or process; or (2) to translate research findings or other knowledge into a plan or design for a new product or process or for a significant improvement to an existing product or process whether intended for sale or the entity's use, during the reporting period charged to research and development projects, including the costs of developing computer software up to the point in time of achieving technological feasibility, and costs allocated in accounting for a business combination to in-process projects deemed to have no alternative future use.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 25790,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 2604,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Research_and_Development_Expense+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2213945,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Income Taxes Paid Net",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Income_Taxes_Paid_Net.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Income Taxes Paid Net",
      "question": "What is the company's amount of cash paid to foreign, federal, state, and local authorities as taxes on income?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The amount of cash paid during the current period to foreign, federal, state, and local authorities as taxes on income, net of any cash received during the current period as refunds for the overpayment of taxes.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9064,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 994,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Income_Taxes_Paid_Net+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2225944,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Selling and Marketing Expense",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Selling_and_Marketing_Expense.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Selling and Marketing Expense",
      "question": "What is the company's aggregated total amount of expenses directly related to the marketing or selling of products or services?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The aggregate total amount of expenses directly related to the marketing or selling of products or services.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9594,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 1068,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Selling_and_Marketing_Expense+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2228389,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Gross Profits",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Gross_Profits.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Gross Profits",
      "question": "What is the company's aggregated revenue less cost of goods and services sold or operating expenses directly attributable to the revenue generation activity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Aggregate revenue less cost of goods and services sold or operating expenses directly attributable to the revenue generation activity.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form-10K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 30601,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 3245,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Gross_Profits.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Gross_Profits+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2239875,
      "name": "Philipp+Carbon Emissions per Passenger Kilometre",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Philipp+Carbon_Emissions_per_Passenger_Kilometre.json",
      "designer": "Philipp",
      "title": "Carbon Emissions per Passenger Kilometre",
      "question": "What is the airlines carbon emissions per passenger kilometre?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>According to easyjet, \"carbon emissions per passenger kilometre, [is] the standard industry measure of efficiency\".</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Shown in CO2 emissions in grams (g) per kilometer travelled per passenger.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Philipp+Carbon_Emissions_per_Passenger_Kilometre+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2242741,
      "name": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First+Violation Tracker Penalties Total",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Violation_Tracker_Penalties_Total.json",
      "designer": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First",
      "title": "Violation Tracker Penalties Total",
      "question": "What was the total monetary value of penalties imposed by US federal regulatory agencies and the Justice Department?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Data from this metric comes from the [[http://www.goodjobsfirst.org/violation-tracker|Violation Tracker]] provided by [[http://www.goodjobsfirst.org/|Good Jobs First]].</p><p>Violation Tracker is the first US-based national search engine on corporate misconduct. Version 2.0 covers banking, consumer protection, false claims, environmental, health, safety, price-fixing and bribery cases initiated by 30 federal regulatory agencies and the Justice Department since 2010; in all, 112,000 cases with total penalties of $300 billion. Violation Tracker is produced by the [[http://www.corp-research.org/|Corporate Research Project]] of Good Jobs First.</p><p>Presently only the penalty totals across all agencies are available on Wikirate, but the [[http://www.goodjobsfirst.org/violation-tracker|Violation Tracker]] presents a detailed breakdown of these penalties - if you would like more detail this is well worth checking out directly.</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The Corporate Research Project's Violation Tracker collects data on fines and settlements in cases brought by US federal regulatory agencies and the Justice Department. A description of its methodology can be found [[http://www.goodjobsfirst.org/violation-tracker-user-guide|here]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "$",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4833,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 692,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Penalties_Accrued_for_Violations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Violation_Tracker_Penalties_Total+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2257134,
      "name": "Richard Mills+SDG1 Activities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+SDG1_Activities.json",
      "designer": "Richard Mills",
      "title": "SDG1 Activities",
      "question": "Did the company's Communication On Progress describe activities which contribute to achieving SDG1: No Poverty? (List)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>List any activities described in the COP which are relevant to addressing SDG1: No Poverty in the metric value.</p><p>Add a comment with your value that describes these activities in more detail or quotes relevant text from the COP.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+SDG1_Activities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2311236,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Employees Entitled to Parental Leave, GRI 401-3-a (formerly G4-LA3-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_a_formerly_G4_LA3_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Employees Entitled to Parental Leave, GRI 401-3-a (formerly G4-LA3-a)",
      "question": "What is the total number of employees that were entitled to parental leave?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). The full set can be downloaded at <a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a>. </p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090316\">GRI 401</a> addresses the topic of employment.  This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. </p>\r\n<p>Equitable gender choice for maternity and paternity leave, and other leave entitlements, can lead to the greater recruitment and retention of qualified employees. It can also boost employee morale and productivity. Men’s uptake of paternity leave options can indicate the degree to which an organization encourages fathers to take such leave. Men taking advantage of leave entitlements positively impacts women to take such leave without prejudicing their career path.</p>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-LA3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI code 401-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_G4_LA3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this question you need to identify the <strong>total number of employees entitled to parental leave</strong> reported by the organization for a specific year. If the company reports the number by gender, add up the gender totals to get the total number.</p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the Unknown answer box.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords</strong> <strong>and search terms</strong>: Benefits, Employee, LA3, Parental leave, GRI, 401-3</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Parental Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5.5 Ensure women’s full participation and equal opportunities for leadership in political, economic, and public life.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.5 Achieve full and productive employment and equal pay for all, including youth and persons with disabilities.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.8 Protect labour rights and ensure safe, secure working environments for all workers, including migrants."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2283,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 53,
      "companies": 1028,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2021+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Gender_Career_Growth_Parity_Index.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_a_formerly_G4_LA3_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2311262,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Male Employees Entitled to Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Male_Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Male Employees Entitled to Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "question": "What is the total number of male employees that were entitled to parental leave?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). The full set can be downloaded at <a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a>. </p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090316\">GRI 401</a> addresses the topic of employment.  This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. </p>\r\n<p>Equitable gender choice for maternity and paternity leave, and other leave entitlements, can lead to the greater recruitment and retention of qualified employees. It can also boost employee morale and productivity. Men’s uptake of paternity leave options can indicate the degree to which an organization encourages fathers to take such leave. Men taking advantage of leave entitlements positively impacts women to take such leave without prejudicing their career path.</p>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-LA3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI code 401-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_G4_LA3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this question you need to identify the<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> number of male employees who were entitled to parental leave </span>reported by the organization. </p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the Unknown answer box.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">and search terms</span></p>\r\n<p>Benefits, Employee, LA3, Parental leave, GRI, 401-3, Return to work</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>The answer should be expressed as a <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">number (of employees)</span></p>\r\n<p>Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Parental Policies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 401 - Employment",
        "GRI Standards+401-3 Parental leave",
        "GRI Standards+401-3-a Number of employees that were entitled to parental leave, by gender",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.8 Protect labour rights and ensure safe, secure working environments for all workers, including migrants."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 641,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 14,
      "companies": 290,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Male_Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2311271,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Female Employees Entitled to Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Female_Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Female Employees Entitled to Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "question": "What is the total number of female employees that were entitled to parental leave?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). The full set can be downloaded at <a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a>. </p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090316\">GRI 401</a> addresses the topic of employment.  This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. </p>\r\n<p>Equitable gender choice for maternity and paternity leave, and other leave entitlements, can lead to the greater recruitment and retention of qualified employees. It can also boost employee morale and productivity. Men’s uptake of paternity leave options can indicate the degree to which an organization encourages fathers to take such leave. Men taking advantage of leave entitlements positively impacts women to take such leave without prejudicing their career path.</p>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-LA3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI code 401-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_G4_LA3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this question you need to identify the<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> number of female employees who were entitled to parental leave </span>reported by the organization. </p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the Unknown answer box.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">and search terms</span></p>\r\n<p>Benefits, Employee, LA3, Parental leave, GRI, 401-3, Return to work</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>The answer should be expressed as a <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">number (of employees)</span></p>\r\n<p>Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Parental Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 401 - Employment",
        "GRI Standards+401-3 Parental leave",
        "GRI Standards+401-3-a Number of employees that were entitled to parental leave, by gender",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+S1 - Own Workforce",
        "ESRS Standards+S1.1 - Policies related to own workforce",
        "ESRS Standards+S1.14 - Work-life balance metrics",
        "ESRS Standards+S2 - Workers in the Value Chain",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.8 Protect labour rights and ensure safe, secure working environments for all workers, including migrants."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 643,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 16,
      "companies": 291,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Female_Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2311316,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Employees that Took Parental Leave, GRI 401-3-b (formerly G4-LA3-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Employees_that_Took_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_b_formerly_G4_LA3_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Employees that Took Parental Leave, GRI 401-3-b (formerly G4-LA3-b)",
      "question": "What is the total number of employees that took parental leave?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The full set can be downloaded at </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">I</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">n the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards.</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> For this metric, the code G4-LA3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">code 401</span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <a href=\"/Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_G4_LA3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><em>GRI 401</em> addresses the topic of employment. This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. GRI 401 also covers the employment and working conditions in an organization’s supply chain.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Conditions of work are also covered in detail in other Standards:</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>GRI 402: Labor/Management Relations</li>\r\n<li>GRI 403: Occupational Health and Safety</li>\r\n<li>GRI 404: Training and Education</li>\r\n<li>GRI 405: Diversity and Equal Opportunity</li>\r\n<li>GRI 406: Non-discrimination</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question you need to identify the total <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">number of employees entitled to parental leave</span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> </span>reported by the organization <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. If the company reports the number by gender, add up the gender totals to get the total number.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> and search terms: Benefits, Employee, Parental leave, <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">LA3, </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">GRI, 401-3, </span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Parental Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 401 - Employment",
        "GRI Standards+401-3 Parental leave",
        "GRI Standards+401-3-b Number of employees that took parental leave, by gender",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.8 Protect labour rights and ensure safe, secure working environments for all workers, including migrants."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1549,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 19,
      "companies": 678,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Employees_that_Took_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_b_formerly_G4_LA3_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2311347,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Male Employees that Took Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Male_Employees_that_Took_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Male Employees that Took Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "question": "What is the number of male employees that took parental leave?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). The full set can be downloaded at <a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a>. </p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090316\">GRI 401</a> addresses the topic of employment.  This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. </p>\r\n<p>Equitable gender choice for maternity and paternity leave, and other leave entitlements, can lead to the greater recruitment and retention of qualified employees. It can also boost employee morale and productivity. Men’s uptake of paternity leave options can indicate the degree to which an organization encourages fathers to take such leave. Men taking advantage of leave entitlements positively impacts women to take such leave without prejudicing their career path.</p>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-LA3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI code 401-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_G4_LA3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this question you need to identify the<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> number of male employees who took parental leave </span>reported by the organization. </p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the Unknown answer box.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">and search terms</span></p>\r\n<p>Benefits, Employee, LA3, Parental leave, GRI, 401-3, Return to work</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>The answer should be expressed as a <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">number (of employees)</span></p>\r\n<p>Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Parental Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 401 - Employment",
        "GRI Standards+401-3 Parental leave",
        "GRI Standards+401-3-b Number of employees that took parental leave, by gender",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.8 Protect labour rights and ensure safe, secure working environments for all workers, including migrants."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 680,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 17,
      "companies": 306,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Male_Employees_that_Took_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2311365,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Female Employees that Took Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Female_Employees_that_Took_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Female Employees that Took Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "question": "What is the number of female employees that took parental leave?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). The full set can be downloaded at <a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a>. </p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090316\">GRI 401</a> addresses the topic of employment.  This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. </p>\r\n<p>Equitable gender choice for maternity and paternity leave, and other leave entitlements, can lead to the greater recruitment and retention of qualified employees. It can also boost employee morale and productivity. Men’s uptake of paternity leave options can indicate the degree to which an organization encourages fathers to take such leave. Men taking advantage of leave entitlements positively impacts women to take such leave without prejudicing their career path.</p>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-LA3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI code 401-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_G4_LA3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this question you need to identify the<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> number of female employees who took parental leave </span>reported by the organization. </p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the Unknown answer box.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">and search terms</span></p>\r\n<p>Benefits, Employee, LA3, Parental leave, GRI, 401-3, Return to work</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>The answer should be expressed as a <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">number (of employees)</span></p>\r\n<p>Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Parental Policies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 401 - Employment",
        "GRI Standards+401-3 Parental leave",
        "GRI Standards+401-3-b Number of employees that took parental leave, by gender",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.8 Protect labour rights and ensure safe, secure working environments for all workers, including migrants."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 687,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 17,
      "companies": 309,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Female_Employees_that_Took_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2311380,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Employees Returned after Parental Leave, GRI 401-3-c (formerly G4-LA3-c)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Employees_Returned_after_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_c_formerly_G4_LA3_c.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Employees Returned after Parental Leave, GRI 401-3-c (formerly G4-LA3-c)",
      "question": "What is the total number of employees who returned to work after parental leave ended?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The full set can be downloaded at </span><a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">I</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">n the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards.</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> For this metric, the code G4-LA3-c is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">code 401</span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <a href=\"/Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_G4_LA3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090316\">GRI 401</a> addresses the topic of employment. This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. GRI 401 also covers the employment and working conditions in an organization’s supply chain.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question you need to identify the total <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">number of employees who returned after parental leave</span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> </span>reported by the organization <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. If the company reports the number by gender, add up the gender totals to get the total number.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> and search terms: Benefits, Employee, Leave, GRI, 401-3</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Parental Policies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 401 - Employment",
        "GRI Standards+401-3 Parental leave",
        "GRI Standards+401-3-c Number of employees that returned to work in the reporting period after parental leave ended, by gender",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.8 Protect labour rights and ensure safe, secure working environments for all workers, including migrants."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1587,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 20,
      "companies": 680,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Employees_Returned_after_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_c_formerly_G4_LA3_c+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2311388,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Male Employees Returned after Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Male_Employees_Returned_after_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Male Employees Returned after Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "question": "What is the number of male employees who returned to work after parental leave ended?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). The full set can be downloaded at <a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a>. </p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090316\">GRI 401</a> addresses the topic of employment.  This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. </p>\r\n<p>Equitable gender choice for maternity and paternity leave, and other leave entitlements, can lead to the greater recruitment and retention of qualified employees. It can also boost employee morale and productivity. Men’s uptake of paternity leave options can indicate the degree to which an organization encourages fathers to take such leave. Men taking advantage of leave entitlements positively impacts women to take such leave without prejudicing their career path.</p>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-LA3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI code 401-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_G4_LA3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this question you need to identify the<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> number of male employees who returned to work after parental leave ended </span>reported by the organization. </p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the Unknown answer box.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">and search terms</span></p>\r\n<p>Benefits, Employee, LA3, Parental leave, GRI, 401-3, Return to work</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>The answer should be expressed as a <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">number (of employees)</span></p>\r\n<p>Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 401 - Employment",
        "GRI Standards+401-3 Parental leave",
        "GRI Standards+401-3-c Number of employees that returned to work in the reporting period after parental leave ended, by gender"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 635,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 14,
      "companies": 290,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Male_Employees_Returned_after_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2311401,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Female Employees Returned after Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Female_Employees_Returned_after_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Female Employees Returned after Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "question": "What is the number of female employees who returned to work after parental leave ended?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). The full set can be downloaded at <a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a>. </p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090316\">GRI 401</a> addresses the topic of employment.  This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. </p>\r\n<p>Equitable gender choice for maternity and paternity leave, and other leave entitlements, can lead to the greater recruitment and retention of qualified employees. It can also boost employee morale and productivity. Men’s uptake of paternity leave options can indicate the degree to which an organization encourages fathers to take such leave. Men taking advantage of leave entitlements positively impacts women to take such leave without prejudicing their career path.</p>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-LA3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI code 401-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_G4_LA3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this question you need to identify the<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> number of female employees who returned to work after parental leave ended </span>reported by the organization. </p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the Unknown answer box.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">and search terms</span></p>\r\n<p>Benefits, Employee, LA3, Parental leave, GRI, 401-3, Return to work</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>The answer should be expressed as a <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">number (of employees)</span></p>\r\n<p>Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Parental Policies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 401 - Employment",
        "GRI Standards+401-3 Parental leave",
        "GRI Standards+401-3-b Number of employees that took parental leave, by gender",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.8 Protect labour rights and ensure safe, secure working environments for all workers, including migrants."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 639,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 15,
      "companies": 289,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Female_Employees_Returned_after_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2311456,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Employees Returned after Parental Leave and Still Employed 12 Months Later, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Employees_Returned_after_Parental_Leave_and_Still_Employed_12_Months_Later_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Employees Returned after Parental Leave and Still Employed 12 Months Later, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "question": "What is the total number of employees who returned to work after parental leave ended and who were still employed twelve months after their return to work?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). The full set can be downloaded at <a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a>. </p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090316\">GRI 401</a> addresses the topic of employment.  This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. </p>\r\n<p>Equitable gender choice for maternity and paternity leave, and other leave entitlements, can lead to the greater recruitment and retention of qualified employees. It can also boost employee morale and productivity. Men’s uptake of paternity leave options can indicate the degree to which an organization encourages fathers to take such leave. Men taking advantage of leave entitlements positively impacts women to take such leave without prejudicing their career path.</p>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-LA3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI code 401-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_G4_LA3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this question you need to identify the<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> total number of employees who returned to work after parental leave ended and who were still employed twelve months after their return to work </span>reported by the organization. </p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the Unknown answer box.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">and search terms</span></p>\r\n<p>Benefits, Employee, LA3, Parental leave, GRI, 401-3, Return to work</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>The answer should be expressed as a <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">number (of employees)</span></p>\r\n<p>Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 401 - Employment",
        "GRI Standards+401-3 Parental leave",
        "GRI Standards+401-3-d Number of employees that returned to work after parental leave ended that were still employed 12 months after their return to work, by gender"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Employees_Returned_after_Parental_Leave_and_Still_Employed_12_Months_Later_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2311473,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Male Employees Returned after Parental Leave and Still Employed 12 Months Later, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Male_Employees_Returned_after_Parental_Leave_and_Still_Employed_12_Months_Later_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Male Employees Returned after Parental Leave and Still Employed 12 Months Later, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "question": "What is the number of male employees who returned to work after parental leave ended and who were still employed twelve months after their return to work?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). The full set can be downloaded at <a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a>. </p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090316\">GRI 401</a> addresses the topic of employment.  This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. </p>\r\n<p>Equitable gender choice for maternity and paternity leave, and other leave entitlements, can lead to the greater recruitment and retention of qualified employees. It can also boost employee morale and productivity. Men’s uptake of paternity leave options can indicate the degree to which an organization encourages fathers to take such leave. Men taking advantage of leave entitlements positively impacts women to take such leave without prejudicing their career path.</p>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-LA3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI code 401-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_G4_LA3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this question you need to identify the<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> number of male employees who returned to work after parental leave ended and who were still employed twelve months after their return to work </span>reported by the organization. </p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the Unknown answer box.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">and search terms</span></p>\r\n<p>Benefits, Employee, LA3, Parental leave, GRI, 401-3, Return to work</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>The answer should be expressed as a <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">number (of employees)</span></p>\r\n<p>Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 401 - Employment",
        "GRI Standards+401-3 Parental leave",
        "GRI Standards+401-3-d Number of employees that returned to work after parental leave ended that were still employed 12 months after their return to work, by gender"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Male_Employees_Returned_after_Parental_Leave_and_Still_Employed_12_Months_Later_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2311544,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Female Employees Returned after Parental Leave and Still Employed 12 Months Later, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Female_Employees_Returned_after_Parental_Leave_and_Still_Employed_12_Months_Later_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Female Employees Returned after Parental Leave and Still Employed 12 Months Later, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "question": "What is the number of female employees who returned to work after parental leave ended and who were still employed twelve months after their return to work?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). The full set can be downloaded at <a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a>. </p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090316\">GRI 401</a> addresses the topic of employment.  This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. </p>\r\n<p>Equitable gender choice for maternity and paternity leave, and other leave entitlements, can lead to the greater recruitment and retention of qualified employees. It can also boost employee morale and productivity. Men’s uptake of paternity leave options can indicate the degree to which an organization encourages fathers to take such leave. Men taking advantage of leave entitlements positively impacts women to take such leave without prejudicing their career path.</p>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-LA3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI code 401-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_G4_LA3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this question you need to identify the<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> number of female employees who returned to work after parental leave ended and who were still employed twelve months after their return to work </span>reported by the organization. </p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the Unknown answer box.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">and search terms</span></p>\r\n<p>Benefits, Employee, LA3, Parental leave, GRI, 401-3, Return to work</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>The answer should be expressed as a <strong>number (of employees)</strong></p>\r\n<p>Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 401 - Employment",
        "GRI Standards+401-3 Parental leave",
        "GRI Standards+401-3-d Number of employees that returned to work after parental leave ended that were still employed 12 months after their return to work, by gender"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Female_Employees_Returned_after_Parental_Leave_and_Still_Employed_12_Months_Later_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2311569,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Return to Work Rate after Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Return_to_Work_Rate_after_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Return to Work Rate after Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "question": "What is the return to work rate of employees who took parental leave?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). The full set can be downloaded at <a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a>. </p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090316\">GRI 401</a> addresses the topic of employment.  This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. </p>\r\n<p>Equitable gender choice for maternity and paternity leave, and other leave entitlements, can lead to the greater recruitment and retention of qualified employees. It can also boost employee morale and productivity. Men’s uptake of paternity leave options can indicate the degree to which an organization encourages fathers to take such leave. Men taking advantage of leave entitlements positively impacts women to take such leave without prejudicing their career path.</p>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-LA3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI code 401-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_G4_LA3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this question you need to identify the<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> return to work rate of employees who took parental leave </span>reported by the organization. </p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the Unknown answer box.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">and search terms</span></p>\r\n<p>Benefits, Employee, LA3, Parental leave, GRI, 401-3, Return to work</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>The return to work rate should be expressed as a percentage (%).</p>\r\n<p>Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 401 - Employment",
        "GRI Standards+401-3 Parental leave",
        "GRI Standards+401-3-e Return-to-work and retention rates for employees who took parental leave, by gender"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Return_to_Work_Rate_after_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2311582,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Male Return to Work Rate after Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Male_Return_to_Work_Rate_after_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Male Return to Work Rate after Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "question": "What is the return to work rate of male employees who took parental leave?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). The full set can be downloaded at <a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a>. </p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090316\">GRI 401</a> addresses the topic of employment.  This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. </p>\r\n<p>Equitable gender choice for maternity and paternity leave, and other leave entitlements, can lead to the greater recruitment and retention of qualified employees. It can also boost employee morale and productivity. Men’s uptake of paternity leave options can indicate the degree to which an organization encourages fathers to take such leave. Men taking advantage of leave entitlements positively impacts women to take such leave without prejudicing their career path.</p>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-LA3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI code 401-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_G4_LA3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this question you need to identify the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">return to work rate of male employees who took parental leave </span>reported by the organization. </p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the Unknown answer box.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">and search terms</span></p>\r\n<p>Benefits, Employee, LA3, Parental leave, GRI, 401-3, Return to work</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>The return to work rate should be expressed as a percentage (%).</p>\r\n<p>Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 401 - Employment",
        "GRI Standards+401-3 Parental leave",
        "GRI Standards+401-3-e Return-to-work and retention rates for employees who took parental leave, by gender"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Male_Return_to_Work_Rate_after_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2311590,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Female Return to Work Rate after Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Female_Return_to_Work_Rate_after_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Female Return to Work Rate after Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "question": "What is the return to work rate of female employees who took parental leave?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). The full set can be downloaded at <a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a>. </p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090316\">GRI 401</a> addresses the topic of employment.  This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. </p>\r\n<p>Equitable gender choice for maternity and paternity leave, and other leave entitlements, can lead to the greater recruitment and retention of qualified employees. It can also boost employee morale and productivity. Men’s uptake of paternity leave options can indicate the degree to which an organization encourages fathers to take such leave. Men taking advantage of leave entitlements positively impacts women to take such leave without prejudicing their career path.</p>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-LA3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI code 401-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_G4_LA3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this question you need to identify the <strong>return to work rate of female employees who took parental leave </strong>reported by the organization. </p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the Unknown answer box.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">and search terms</span></p>\r\n<p>Benefits, Employee, LA3, Parental leave, GRI, 401-3, Return to work</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>The return to work rate should be expressed as a percentage (%).</p>\r\n<p>Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 401 - Employment",
        "GRI Standards+401-3 Parental leave",
        "GRI Standards+401-3-e Return-to-work and retention rates for employees who took parental leave, by gender"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 13,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Female_Return_to_Work_Rate_after_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2311604,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Retention Rate of Employees who took Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Retention_Rate_of_Employees_who_took_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Retention Rate of Employees who took Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "question": "What is the retention rate of employees who took parental leave?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). The full set can be downloaded at <a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a>. </p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090316\">GRI 401</a> addresses the topic of employment.  This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. </p>\r\n<p>Equitable gender choice for maternity and paternity leave, and other leave entitlements, can lead to the greater recruitment and retention of qualified employees. It can also boost employee morale and productivity. Men’s uptake of paternity leave options can indicate the degree to which an organization encourages fathers to take such leave. Men taking advantage of leave entitlements positively impacts women to take such leave without prejudicing their career path.</p>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-LA3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI code 401-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_G4_LA3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this question you need to identify the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">retention rate of employees who took parental leave</span> reported by the organization. </p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the Unknown answer box.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">and search terms</span></p>\r\n<p>Benefits, Employee, LA3, Parental leave, GRI, 401-3, Retention</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>The retention rate should be expressed as a percentage (%).</p>\r\n<p>Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 401 - Employment",
        "GRI Standards+401-3 Parental leave",
        "GRI Standards+401-3-e Return-to-work and retention rates for employees who took parental leave, by gender"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Retention_Rate_of_Employees_who_took_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2311613,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Retention Rate of Male Employees who took Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Retention_Rate_of_Male_Employees_who_took_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Retention Rate of Male Employees who took Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "question": "What is the retention rate of male employees who took parental leave?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). The full set can be downloaded at <a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a>. </p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090316\">GRI 401</a> addresses the topic of employment.  This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. </p>\r\n<p>Equitable gender choice for maternity and paternity leave, and other leave entitlements, can lead to the greater recruitment and retention of qualified employees. It can also boost employee morale and productivity. Men’s uptake of paternity leave options can indicate the degree to which an organization encourages fathers to take such leave. Men taking advantage of leave entitlements positively impacts women to take such leave without prejudicing their career path.</p>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-LA3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI code 401-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_G4_LA3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this question you need to identify the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">retention rate of male employees who took parental leave</span> reported by the organization. </p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the Unknown answer box.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">and search terms</span></p>\r\n<p>Benefits, Employee, LA3, Parental leave, GRI, 401-3, Retention</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>The retention rate should be expressed as a percentage (%).</p>\r\n<p>Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 401 - Employment",
        "GRI Standards+401-3 Parental leave",
        "GRI Standards+401-3-e Return-to-work and retention rates for employees who took parental leave, by gender"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Retention_Rate_of_Male_Employees_who_took_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2311621,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Retention Rate of Female Employees who took Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Retention_Rate_of_Female_Employees_who_took_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Retention Rate of Female Employees who took Parental Leave, GRI 401-3 (formerly G4-LA3)",
      "question": "What is the retention rate of female employees who took parental leave?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). The full set can be downloaded at <a href=\"http://www.globalreporting.org/standards/\" target=\"_blank\">www.globalreporting.org/standards/</a>. </p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090316\">GRI 401</a> addresses the topic of employment.  This includes an organization’s approach to employment or job creation, that is, an organization’s approach to hiring, recruitment, retention and related practices, and the working conditions it provides. </p>\r\n<p>Equitable gender choice for maternity and paternity leave, and other leave entitlements, can lead to the greater recruitment and retention of qualified employees. It can also boost employee morale and productivity. Men’s uptake of paternity leave options can indicate the degree to which an organization encourages fathers to take such leave. Men taking advantage of leave entitlements positively impacts women to take such leave without prejudicing their career path.</p>\r\n<p>In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Standards. For this metric, the code G4-LA3 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI code 401-3 is used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/Employees_Entitled_to_Parental_Leave_G4_LA3_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this question you need to identify the <strong>retention rate of female employees who took parental leave</strong> reported by the organization. </p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the Unknown answer box.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">and search terms</span></p>\r\n<p>Benefits, Employee, LA3, Parental leave, GRI, 401-3, Retention</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong></p>\r\n<p>The retention rate should be expressed as a percentage (%).</p>\r\n<p>Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 401 - Employment",
        "GRI Standards+401-3 Parental leave",
        "GRI Standards+401-3-e Return-to-work and retention rates for employees who took parental leave, by gender"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Retention_Rate_of_Female_Employees_who_took_Parental_Leave_GRI_401_3_formerly_G4_LA3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2312180,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Company Pledge Depth - SDG2",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG2.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Company Pledge Depth - SDG2",
      "question": "How much did the company pledge to advancing SDG 2?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers Sustainable Development Goal 2 of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 2 aims to end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture. Improved sustainable agriculture is critical as the world’s population grows and demand on global food systems intensifies. Thus, supply chains can benefit from playing a critical role in designing and delivering effective, scalable and practical solutions for food security and sustainable agriculture.</p><p><br>[[http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/2_Why-it-Matters_ZeroHunger_2p.pdf| Zero Hunger: Why it Matters]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge.</p><p></p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge.</p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG.</p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge.</p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, using the drop-down arrow you can determine how much the company in question has <strong>pledged to advancing SDG 2.</strong></p></li></ul><p></p><p>For project partners and data analysts who have set out to research this indicator, the Global Sourcing Council suggests the following methodology:</p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2312189,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Company Pledge Depth - SDG3",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG3.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Company Pledge Depth - SDG3",
      "question": "How much did the company pledge to advancing SDG 3?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers Sustainable Development Goal 3 of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 3 aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. The goal pertains to child health, maternal health, HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases to increase life expectancy. Investing in healthy lives and well-being for all can build reputation in corporate responsibility, while strengthening communities.Investing in healthy lives and well-being for all can build your reputation in corporate responsibility, while strengthening the communities in your supply chain.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge.</p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge.</p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG.</p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge.</p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, using the drop-down arrow you can determine how much the company in question has <strong>pledged to advancing SDG 3.</strong></p></li></ul><p></p><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:</p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2312202,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Company Pledge Depth - SDG4",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG4.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Company Pledge Depth - SDG4",
      "question": "How much did the company pledge to advancing SDG 4?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers Sustainable Development Goal 4 of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 4 aims to ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. Quality education is the foundation for improving lives and sustainable development. A lack of relevant skills in the supply chain deprives businesses of the talent they need. Education can unleash the skills, talent and ingenuity needed for the private sector to thrive. A more educated workforce also leads to greater disposable income for consumer spending. It is in the vital interest of each business entity to actively participate in increasing literacy, and a broad range of other learning and educational opportunities, in areas they operate in, as the foundation for future growth.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge.</p><p></p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge.</p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG.</p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge.</p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, using the drop-down arrow you can determine how much the company in question has <strong>pledged to advancing SDG 4</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:</p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2312212,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Company Pledge Depth - SDG5",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG5.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Company Pledge Depth - SDG5",
      "question": "How much did the company pledge to advancing SDG 5?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers Sustainable Development Goal 5 of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 5 aims to achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls. Women and girls around the world struggle to exercise their rights, face discrimination and violence, receive unequal pay for equal work, and are underrepresented in power and decision-making roles. As entrepreneurs and workers, they are economically disadvantaged and face legal barriers. Empowering women strengthens democracy, contributes to innovation, and increases diversity and inclusiveness in the workplace. It is key to attracting talent, thus advancing companies’ growth and competitiveness in the global marketplace. A worldwide increase in gender equality will improve social progress and development.</p><p><br>[[http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/5_Why-it-Matters_GenderEquality_2p.pdf| Gender Equality: Why it Matters]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge.</p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge. <br></p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, using the drop-down arrow you can determine how much the company in question has <strong>pledged to advancing SDG 5</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:</p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG5+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2312222,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Company Pledge Depth - SDG6",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG6.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Company Pledge Depth - SDG6",
      "question": "How much did the company pledge to advancing SDG 6?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers Sustainable Development Goal 6 of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 6 aims to ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all. Water scarcity and pollution create business risk through scarcity and flooding, water quality affected by pollution, reputational risk, and regulatory risk. Current estimates predict a 40% global shortfall in water supply by 2030, and businesses are recognizing that continuing to manage water the same way will place $63 trillion worth of business at risk – or 1.5 times today’s global economy. Water stewardship helps companies identify and manage water-related business risks and enable more sustainable management of shared freshwater resources. Protecting water resources and ensuring sanitation for all also reduces operational costs, protects the company from water stress; and improves the company’s image in the eyes of consumers, investors, and nearby communities. Improvement in clean and accessible water will positively impact food security, livelihood choices and educational opportunities for poor families across the world.</p><p><br>[[http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/6_Why-it-Matters_Sanitation_2p.pdf| Sanitation: Why it Matters]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge.</p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge. <br></p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, using the drop-down arrow you can determine how much the company in question has <strong>pledged to advancing SDG 6</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:</p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG6+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2312231,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Company Pledge Depth - SDG7",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG7.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Company Pledge Depth - SDG7",
      "question": "How much did the company pledge to advancing SDG 7?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers Sustainable Development Goal 7 of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 7 aims to ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all. SDG 7 has four dimensions, calling for energy to be affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern. The global economy’s reliance on fossil fuels and the increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is visibly affecting the climate on every continent. At the same time, one in five people lacks access to electricity. As the UN Development Programme notes, providing clean energy sources in all developing countries to meet rising demand will encourage growth while helping the environment.</p><p><br>[[http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/7_Why-it-Matters_Goal-7_CleanEnergy_2p.pdf| Clean Energy: Why it Matters]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge.</p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge. <br></p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, using the drop-down arrow you can determine how much the company in question has <strong>pledged to advancing SDG 7</strong>.</p></li></ul><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:<br></p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council<br></p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br></p></li><li><p>Annual Report<br></p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports<br></p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.<br></p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG7+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2312246,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Company Pledge Depth - SDG8",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG8.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Company Pledge Depth - SDG8",
      "question": "How much did the company pledge to advancing SDG 8?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers Sustainable Development Goal 8 of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 8 aims to promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all. Improving workplace practices can raise morale and job satisfaction, and foster creativity and innovation. Upholding freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining can improve industrial relations and lower social auditing costs. Finally, taking action to reduce unemployment supports a more stable business environment.</p><p></p><p>[[http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/8_Why-it-Matters_Goal-8_EconomicGrowth_2p.pdf| Economic Growth: Why it Matters]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge.</p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge. <br></p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, using the drop-down arrow you can determine how much the company in question has <strong>pledged to advancing SDG 8</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:</p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG8+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2312261,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Company Pledge Depth - SDG9",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG9.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Company Pledge Depth - SDG9",
      "question": "How much did the company pledge to advancing SDG 9?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers Sustainable Development Goal 9 of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 9 aims to build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation. Many developing countries lack widespread basic infrastructure – roads, sanitation, water, electrical power, and phone, internet, and other information and communication technologies (ICTs). This creates a major barrier to doing business, inhibits innovation and entrepreneurship, and limits access to health care and education. Improvement in transport, irrigation, energy and information and communication technology is crucial to achieving sustainable development and empowering communities in many countries.</p><p><br>[[http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/9_Why-it-Matters_Goal-9_Industry_1p.pdf| Industry: Why it Matters]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge.</p><p></p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge.</p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG.</p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge.</p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, using the drop-down arrow you can determine how much the company in question has <strong>pledged to advancing SDG 9</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:</p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul><p></p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG9+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2312270,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Company Pledge Depth - SDG10",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG10.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Company Pledge Depth - SDG10",
      "question": "How much did the company pledge to advancing SDG 10?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers Sustainable Development Goal 10 of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 10 aims to reduce inequality within and among countries. Inequalities within countries rose by 11% in developing countries between 1990 and 2010. Growth must be inclusive in all segments of society and involve the three dimensions of sustainable development – economic, social and environmental. Fighting inequality can unlock new markets, attract new business, lead to innovation of new products or services, increase employee morale and productivity and manage risk in communities. The UN Global Compact suggests these steps for business:</p><ul><li><p>Create decent jobs, goods and services that meet basic needs and more inclusive value chains</p></li><li><p>Make strategic social investments and promote public policies that support social sustainability</p></li><li><p>Partner with other businesses, pooling strengths to make a greater positive impact</p></li></ul>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge.</p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge. <br></p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, using the drop-down arrow you can determine how much the company in question has <strong>pledged to advancing SDG 10</strong>.</p></li></ul><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:<br></p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council<br></p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br></p></li><li><p>Annual Report<br></p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports<br></p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.<br></p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG10+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2312282,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Company Pledge Depth - SDG11",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG11.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Company Pledge Depth - SDG11",
      "question": "How much did the company pledge to advancing SDG 11?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers Sustainable Development Goal 11 of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 11 aims to make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. Cities are large-scale users of energy, water and processed and natural products. Cities generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and produce waste beyond the planet’s regenerative and carrying capacity. The challenge and opportunity for economic activity in cities is to create jobs and prosperity while not straining land and resources. Investments are needed in safe and affordable housing, upgrading slum settlements, public transport, creating green public spaces, and improving urban planning and management.</p><p>[[http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/16-00055K_Why-it-Matters_Goal-11_Cities_2p.pdf| Sustainable Cities: Why it Matters]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge.<br></p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge. <br></p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, using the drop-down arrow you can determine how much the company in question has <strong>pledged to advancing SDG 11</strong>.</p></li></ul><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:<br></p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council<br></p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br></p></li><li><p>Annual Report<br></p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports<br></p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.<br></p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG11+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2312297,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Company Pledge Depth - SDG12",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG12.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Company Pledge Depth - SDG12",
      "question": "How much did the company pledge to advancing SDG 12?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers Sustainable Development Goal 12 of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 12 aims to ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns. Its targets address efficiency in the use of natural resources; sustainable management of natural resources; food waste and food losses in production; managing chemicals and wastes to reduce their release into air, water and soil; reducing waste generation (recycling, etc.); corporate sustainability reporting; public procurement; awareness-raising about sustainable lifestyles; sustainable tourism; and wasteful consumption of fossil fuels.</p><p>[[http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/16-00055L_Why-it-Matters_Goal-12_Consumption_2p.pdf| Responsible Consumption and Production: Why it Matters]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge. <br></p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge. <br></p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, using the drop-down arrow you can determine how much the company in question has <strong>pledged to advancing SDG 12</strong>.</p></li></ul><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:<br></p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council<br></p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br></p></li><li><p>Annual Report<br></p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports<br></p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.<br></p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG12+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2312306,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Company Pledge Depth - SDG13",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG13.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Company Pledge Depth - SDG13",
      "question": "How much did the company pledge to advancing SDG 13?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers Sustainable Development Goal 13 of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 13 aims to take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts. Its targets address: resilience to climate related hazards and natural disasters, making climate change and low-carbon development part of national strategies and education and raising awareness.</p><p>[[http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/16-00055_Why_it_Matters_Climate_Action_Business_letter_size_1p.pdf| Climate Action: Why it Matters]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge. <br></p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge. <br></p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, using the drop-down arrow you can determine how much the company in question has <strong>pledged to advancing SDG 13</strong>.</p></li></ul><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:<br></p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council<br></p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br></p></li><li><p>Annual Report<br></p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports<br></p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.<br></p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG13+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2312315,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Company Pledge Depth - SDG14",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG14.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Company Pledge Depth - SDG14",
      "question": "How much did the company pledge to advancing SDG 14?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers Sustainable Development Goal 14 of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 14 aims to conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development. The oceans are estimated to have financial worth of US$24 trillion, including the jobs they generate in tourism, biotechnology, fishing and shipping. Given the scale of the oceans and ocean-related challenges, collaborative platforms are necessary for each actor to have an impact.</p><p>[[http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/14_Why-it-Matters_Goal-14_Life-Below-Water_3p.pdf| Life Below Water: Why it Matters]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge. <br></p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge. <br></p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, using the drop-down arrow you can determine how much the company in question has <strong>pledged to advancing SDG 14</strong>.</p></li></ul><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:<br></p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council<br></p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br></p></li><li><p>Annual Report<br></p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports<br></p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.<br></p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG14+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2312368,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Company Pledge Depth - SDG15",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG15.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Company Pledge Depth - SDG15",
      "question": "How much did the company pledge to advancing SDG 15?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers Sustainable Development Goal 15 of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 15 aims to protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss. People need nature to thrive. Deforestation – which takes place around the world at a rate of 13 million hectares per year – is due largely to commercial agriculture. The loss of forest also causes loss of biodiversity, leading to low crop productivity and value, in a vicious cycle. At the same time, deforestation drives climate change. Where drought and desertification degrades land, 20 million tons of grains could have been grown each year. These interlocking causes and effects are the focus of SDG 15.</p><p>[[http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/15_Why-it-Matters_Goal15__Life-on-Land_3p.pdf| Life on Land: Why it Matters]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge. <br></p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge. <br></p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, using the drop-down arrow you can determine how much the company in question has <strong>pledged to advancing SDG 15</strong>.</p></li></ul><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:<br></p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council<br></p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br></p></li><li><p>Annual Report<br></p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports<br></p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.<br></p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG15+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2312385,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Company Pledge Depth - SDG16",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG16.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Company Pledge Depth - SDG16",
      "question": "How much did the company pledge to advancing SDG 16?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers Sustainable Development Goal 16 of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 16 aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels. SDG 16 addresses: reducing violence, ending violence against children (including trafficking), promoting rule of law and access to justice, reducing illicit flows and combating organized crime, reducing corruption and bribery, developing effective, accountable and transparent institutions, ensuring inclusive, representative decision-making, and ensuring public access to information and protect fundamental freedoms. Conflict and instability pose risks to all parts of the business sector. Anti-corruption engagement increasingly is being used as a litmus test for the overall quality of companies’ business practices and management. Firms also stand to benefit from working with community leaders and other stakeholders to create trust and transparency, thus reducing risk.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge. <br></p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG. <br></p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge. <br></p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, using the drop-down arrow you can determine how much the company in question has <strong>pledged to advancing SDG 16</strong>.</p></li></ul><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:<br></p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council</p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG16+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2312404,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Company Pledge Depth - SDG17",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG17.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Company Pledge Depth - SDG17",
      "question": "How much did the company pledge to advancing SDG 17?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers Sustainable Development Goal 17 of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 17 aims to strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development. Its targets address five areas: Finance; Technology; Capacity-building; Trade; and Systemic issues, such as Policy and institutional coherence, and Data, monitoring and accountability. For businesses to succeed, they require access to energy, good governance and sustainable economic development, to name a few fundamentals. Companies can do much to build this foundation and create long-term value. UBS has said the SDGs create opportunities for “financially attractive investments.\"</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[http://gscouncil.org/challenge/|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge. <br></p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge. </p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG. </p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge. </p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, using the drop-down arrow you can determine how much the company in question has <strong>pledged to advancing SDG 17</strong>.</p></li></ul><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:<br></p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council</p></li><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Company_Pledge_Depth_SDG17+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2313319,
      "name": "Global Sourcing Council+Pledge Breadth - SDGs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Pledge_Breadth_SDGs.json",
      "designer": "Global Sourcing Council",
      "title": "Pledge Breadth - SDGs",
      "question": "Which of the SDGs did the company pledge to for the GSC Half-Billion Dollars Challenge?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric covers the importance of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. SDGs represent a view of what countries, companies and citizens of the world can achieve together to protect and improve all life on earth. This metric indicates which of the SDGs the company has decided to focus its efforts for advancement on. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge page of the Global Sourcing Council [[<a href=\"http://gscouncil.org/challenge/\">http://gscouncil.org/challenge/</a>|website]]. Using the dynamic GSC Half-Billion Challenge Progress Barometer you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge. </p><ul><li><p>Click on the tab “All Pledges” to see the total financial capacity that has been pledged to the SDGs in the Half-Billion Dollars Challenge. </p></li><li><p>Click on the tab “By SDG” to view the breakdown of financial capacity that has been pledged to each SDG. </p></li><li><p>Click on the tab ‘By Organization’ to view the list of organizations that have taken the pledge. </p></li><li><p>Select the company you are to research from the list. Then, using the drop-down arrow you can determine <strong>which of the SDGs the company in question has pledged to advancing. </strong></p></li></ul><p><br></p><p>For further research the Global Sourcing Council suggests reviewing the following additional resources:</p><ul><li><p>Global Sourcing Council</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p></li><li><p>Annual Report</p></li><li><p>CSO Statements or Reports</p></li><li><p>Investigative Reports, Surveys, Articles, etc.</p></li><li><p>SDG Indicators</p></li><li><p>Demographic </p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "SDG1: No Poverty",
        "SDG2: No Hunger",
        "SDG3: Good Health and Well-being",
        "SDG4: Quality Education",
        "SDG5: Gender Equality",
        "SDG6: Clean Water and Sanitation",
        "SDG7: Affordable and Clean Energy",
        "SDG8: Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "SDG9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure",
        "SDG10: Reduced Inequalities",
        "SDG11: Sustainable Cities and Communities",
        "SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "SDG13: Climate Action",
        "SDG14: Life Below Water",
        "SDG15: Life on Land",
        "SDG16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions",
        "SDG17: Partnerships for the Goals"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Sourcing_Council+Pledge_Breadth_SDGs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2313632,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Surface water withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Surface_water_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Surface water withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)",
      "question": "How much Surface Water did the company withdraw (in cubic metres)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000089850\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 303</a> addresses the topic of water and effluents. Access to fresh water is essential for human life and wellbeing, and is recognized by the United Nations (UN) as a human right. The Sustainable Development Goals, adopted by the UN as part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, include key targets related to sustainable water management under Goal 6: ‘Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all’. These targets aim, for example, to achieve universal access to safe and affordable drinking water, improve water quality, and address water scarcity.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The amount of water withdrawn and consumed by an organization and the quality of its discharges, can impact the functioning of the ecosystem in numerous ways. Direct impacts on a catchment can have wider impacts on the quality of life in an area, including social and economic consequences for local communities and indigenous peoples. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Surface water - </strong>water that occurs naturally on the Earth’s surface in ice sheets, ice caps, glaciers, icebergs, bogs, ponds, lakes, rivers, and streams</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">G4-EN8 is used in company reporting prior to 2018</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, and the </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">new GRI 303-3 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Surface_Water_Withdrawals_G4_EN8_a_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify the surface water withdrawn by an organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 1rem;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p>- Water</p>\r\n<p>- Surface water</p>\r\n<p>- Withdrawal</p>\r\n<p>- 303-3</p>\r\n<p>- GRI</p>\r\n<p>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units</span></p>\r\n<p>Companies may report water withdrawals in hundreds, thousands or millions of litres, gallons or cubic feet. <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">The answer for this metric must be entered into Wikirate in cubic metres (M3)</span>. Make sure you check the unit of measurement and do any conversions necessary. Enter the full number into the answer field.</p>\r\n<p>E.g. If the company reports its surface water withdrawals as '5 million gallons' the answer should be converted to cubic feet (M3) and entered on Wikirate as '22730.45 M3'</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "cubic metres",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 303 - Water and Effluents",
        "GRI Standards+303-3 Water withdrawal",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E3 - Water",
        "ESRS Standards+E3.4 - Water metrics",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6: Clean Water and Sanitation",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6.4 Increase water-use efficiency and ensure sustainable freshwater supply to address water scarcity.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6.6 Protect and restore water-related ecosystems such as wetlands, rivers, forests, and lakes."
      ],
      "scores": [
        "Global Reporting Initiative+Surface water withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1944,
      "bookmarkers": 6,
      "datasets": 30,
      "companies": 786,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Surface_water_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Surface_water_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2347634,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+SDG5 (Gender Equality) Activities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG5_Gender_Equality_Activities.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "SDG5 (Gender Equality) Activities",
      "question": "Did the company's Communication On Progress describe activities which contribute to achieving SDG5: Gender Equality? (List)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>[[http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/gender-equality/| UN Sustainable Development Goal 5 - Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>List any activities described in the COP which are relevant to addressing SDG5: Gender Equality as the metric value.</p><p>Add a comment with your value that describes these activities in more detail or quotes relevant text from the COP.</p><p>This metric is being developed collaboratively by the Wikirate community and there is no strict definition of what counts as a contribution to SDG 5. As such, everyone who researches companies on this metric is encouraged to add their thoughts on what kinds of activity should count towards achieving this SDG, both as comments on this metric and also by editing the list of examples below.</p><p>Examples of activities that are relevant to addressing SDG 5: Gender Equality.</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 7,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG5_Gender_Equality_Activities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2527014,
      "name": "Shinduvi Zitha+Nordic Companies Disclosing Climate Change Data",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Shinduvi_Zitha+Nordic_Companies_Disclosing_Climate_Change_Data.json",
      "designer": "Shinduvi Zitha",
      "title": "Nordic Companies Disclosing Climate Change Data",
      "question": "What is the latest CDP score obtained by the company in the latest report?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Shinduvi_Zitha+Nordic_Companies_Disclosing_Climate_Change_Data+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2527126,
      "name": "Shinduvi Zitha+Corporate Water Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Shinduvi_Zitha+Corporate_Water_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "Shinduvi Zitha",
      "title": "Corporate Water Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company participate in the annual report of corporate water disclosure?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Shinduvi_Zitha+Corporate_Water_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2537807,
      "name": "Measuring Fitness+energy is from renewable sources",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Measuring_Fitness+energy_is_from_renewable_sources.json",
      "designer": "Measuring Fitness",
      "title": "energy is from renewable sources",
      "question": "% of total energy from renewable sources",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / (m1 + m2) * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~836964"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~836952"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3521,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1286,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Measuring_Fitness+energy_is_from_renewable_sources+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2551111,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Indigenous rights violations, GRI 411-1 (formerly G4-HR8)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Indigenous_rights_violations_GRI_411_1_formerly_G4_HR8.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Indigenous rights violations, GRI 411-1 (formerly G4-HR8)",
      "question": "What is the total number of identified incidents of violations involving the rights of indigenous peoples during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates.</p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000156540\">GRI 411</a> addresses the rights of indigenous peoples. While there is no universal definition of indigenous peoples, they are generally identified as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>tribal peoples in independent countries whose social, cultural and economic conditions distinguish them from other sections of the national community, and whose status is regulated wholly or partially by their own customs or traditions or by special laws or regulations;</li>\r\n<li>peoples in independent countries who are regarded as indigenous on account of their descent from the populations which inhabited the country, or a geographical region to which the country belongs, at the time of conquest or colonization or the establishment of present state boundaries and who, irrespective of their legal status, retain some or all of their own social, economic, cultural and political institutions.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>In the context of this disclosure, an ‘incident’ refers to a legal action or complaint registered with the reporting organization or competent authorities through a formal process, or an instance of non-compliance identified by the organization through established procedures. Established procedures to identify instances of noncompliance can include management system audits, formal monitoring programs, or grievance mechanisms.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify the total number of identified incidents of violations involving the rights of indigenous peoples during the reporting period. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords and search terms for this metric</strong></p>\r\n<p>- Fine</p>\r\n<p>- Non-compliance</p>\r\n<p>- 419-1</p>\r\n<p>- GRI</p>\r\n<p>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong></p>\r\n<p>If the company reports that there have been no incidents of violations involving the rights of indigenous peoples enter the answer as '0'. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "incidents",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 411 - Rights of Indigenous Peoples",
        "GRI Standards+411-1 Incidents of violations involving rights of indigenous peoples",
        "GRI Standards+411-1-a Number of identified incidents of violations involving the rights of indigenous peoples during the reporting period"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 68,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 41,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Indigenous_rights_violations_GRI_411_1_formerly_G4_HR8+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2551724,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total income",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_income.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total income",
      "question": "What is the higher education providers total income?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total income. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This data will be provided by HESA.<br><br>Total consolidated income of the HEP from all sources (e.g. funding council grants, academic fees and support grants, research grants and contracts, other operating income, endowment income, and interest receivable) or as qualified by headings. Sum total of HESA supplied non-residential income total, HESA supplied catering income and HESA supplied residences income.",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "£",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 11,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_income+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2552521,
      "name": "Amnesty International+Conducts Own Due Diligence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Conducts_Own_Due_Diligence.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "Conducts Own Due Diligence",
      "question": "Does the company conduct its own conflict minerals due diligence?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Under the OECD Guidance, downstream companies are supposed to assess the due diligence practices of their smelters/ refiners. Some companies do conduct due diligence on their smelters /refiners, for example by conducting spot checks or site visits to smelters /refiners and reviewing incident reports to look out for risks linked to the smelters / refiners in their supply chain. Others have outsourced this responsibility entirely by relying on third party schemes such as the<a href=\"http://www.conflictfreesourcing.org/\">Conflict Free Sourcing Initiative (CFSI)</a>'s Conflict Free Smelter Program (CFSP) or the Global e-Sustainability Initiative, who check the due diligence practices of smelters / refiners. While companies can use these schemes as a tool to aid their due diligence, they should not be relying solely on them.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company’s Conflict Minerals Report describes due diligence conducted directly by the company, (e.g. through site visits, reviewing incident reports).</p><p>Some companies have outsourced this responsibility entirely by relying on third party schemes such as the <a href=\"http://www.conflictfreesourcing.org/\">Conflict Free Sourcing Initiative (CFSI)</a>'s Conflict Free Smelter Program (CFSP) or the Global e-Sustainability Initiative, who check the due diligence practices of smelters / refiners.</p><p>Answer options:<br><strong>Yes</strong> - Where the company has undertaken its own due diligence, give a “Yes” value and quote the relevant part of the report as a comment. For an example see <a href=\"http://images.apple.com/supplier-responsibility/pdf/Conflict_Minerals_Report_2016.pdf\">Apple’s 2016 report</a>, which discusses how it reviews reports on incidents that may be linked to its smelters / refiners, conducts spot audits and engages directly with its smelters / refiners: page 4 “Further Due Diligence: Incident Review and Resolution” and page 5 “Leveraging Expertise to Drive Desired Outcomes”.</p><p><strong>No</strong> - Where the company does not describe any due diligence it has conducted directly give a “No“ value. If the report references a third party scheme such as CFSI, please make a note about this as a comment.</p><p></p><p><strong>Tip:</strong> Try searching (ctrl-f) for terms like “visit”, “site“, “facility” or “SOR” - if you find any other good search terms for this metric please add them here.</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 41,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 40,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Conducts_Own_Due_Diligence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2552674,
      "name": "Amnesty International+Identified Specific Risks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Identified_Specific_Risks.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "Identified Specific Risks",
      "question": "Does the company’s conflict minerals report identify any specific “red flags” or risks in its supply chain and describe how it managed these?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Dodd Frank requires companies to undertake due diligence in accordance with the OECD Guidance. Annex II of the OECD Guidance lists specific “red flags” or “risks” that companies should look out for in their supply chains and that trigger the need for due diligence in their minerals supply chain. This includes human rights abuses (such as torture, forced labour and child labour), direct or indirect support to armed groups or security forces, bribery, fraudulent misrepresentation, money laundering and issues with respect to payment of taxes, fees and royalties. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Examples of risks or “red flags” include but are not limited to human rights abuses (such as torture, forced labour and child labour), direct or indirect support to armed groups or security forces, bribery, fraudulent misrepresentation, money laundering and issues with respect to payment of taxes, fees and royalties.</p><p>Answer options:</p><p><strong>Yes </strong>– the company identifies specific red flags or risks and how it dealt with them. For an example see [[http://images.apple.com/supplier-responsibility/pdf/Conflict_Minerals_Report_2016.pdf|Apple’s 2016 report]], which mentions how they managed the specific risk of financing armed groups including the DRC police and national army: , pages 4 “Further Due Diligence: Incident Review and Resolution” and A-1.</p><p><strong>No</strong> – the company does not mention any specific red flags or risks in its supply chain (i.e., it does not mention them at all or it refers only generically to how it manages risks). For an example see [[https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/50863/000119312516595165/d191714dex101.htm|Intel’s 2016 report]], which refers generically to what steps they take to manage risks in their supply chain but provides no example of how they managed any specific risk.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Identified_Specific_Risks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554262,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Teaching income (£)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Teaching_income.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Teaching income (£)",
      "question": "What is the higher education providers teaching income?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about teaching income. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This data will be provided by HESA.<br><br>HEP income teaching total includes the income from the Finance record Table 7 UK 'Income analysed by source' Head 1 'Tuition fees and education contracts'. Plus the following from Table 7 England/Wales/Scotland/Northern Ireland depending on administration:<br><br>England<br>• Head 1a 'HEFCE teaching grant' plus,<br>• Head 1c 'HEFCE other grants' plus,<br>• Head 1d 'SFA funding' plus,<br>• Head 1e 'NCTL funding' plus,<br>• Head 1f 'Capital grants recognised in the year'<br><br>Wales<br>• Head 1a 'Teaching grant - full-time UG provision (including PGCE and premia and per capita funding)' plus,<br>• Head 1b 'Teaching grant - full-time PG provision (including premia and per capita funding)' plus,<br>• Head 1c 'Teaching grant - part-time UG provision (including premia and per capita funding)' plus,<br>• Head 1d 'Teaching grant - part-time PG provision (including premia and per capita funding)' plus,<br>• Head 1f 'Non formula funding grant' plus,<br>• Head 1g 'Capital grants recognised in the year - equipment' plus,<br>• Head 1h 'Capital grants recognised in the year - estates' plus,<br>• Head 1i 'DfES recurrent grants'<br><br>Scotland<br>• Head 1a 'General fund teaching' plus,<br>• Head 1c 'Ring-fenced grants' plus,<br>• Head 1d 'Strategic funds' plus,<br>• Head 1e 'SFC capital maintenance grant' plus,<br>• Head 1f 'Capital grants recognised in the year' plus,<br>• Head 1g 'Grants for FE provision'<br><br>Northern Ireland<br>• Head 1a 'Recurrent (teaching)' plus,<br>• Head 1c 'Recurrent - other (including non-recurrent special funding)' plus,<br>• Head 1d 'Capital grants recognised in the year'",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Teaching_income+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554273,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Research income (£)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Research_income.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Research income (£)",
      "question": "What is the higher education providers research income?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about research income. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reson required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This data will be provided by HESA.<br><br>HEP income research total includes all income from the Finance record Table 7 UK 'Income analysed by source' categorised as:<br>• Head 3aix 'Total BIS Research Councils, The Royal Society, British Academy and The Royal Society of Edinburgh' plus,<br>• Head 3b 'UK-based charities (open competitive process)' plus,<br>• Head 3c 'UK-based charities (other)' plus,<br>• Head 3d 'UK central government bodies/local authorities, health and hospital authorities' plus,<br>• Head 3e 'UK central government tax credits for research and development expenditure' plus,<br>• Head 3f 'UK industry, commerce and public corporations' plus,<br>• Head 3h 'EU government bodies' plus,<br>• Head 3i 'EU-based charities (open competitive process)' plus,<br>• Head 3j 'EU industry, commerce and public corporations' plus,<br>• Head 3k 'EU (excluding UK) other' plus,<br>• Head 3l 'Non-EU-based charities (open competitive process)' plus,<br>• Head 3m 'Non-EU industry, commerce and public corporations' plus,<br>• Head 3n 'Non-EU other' plus,<br>• Head 3g 'UK other sources<br><br>Plus the following from Table 7 England/Wales/Scotland/Northern Ireland depending on<br>administration:<br><br>England<br>• Head 1b 'HEFCE research grant'<br><br>Wales<br>• Head 1e 'QR and PGR funding'<br><br>Scotland<br>• Head 1b 'General fund research and knowledge exchange'<br>Northern Ireland<br>• Head 1b 'Recurrent (research)'",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "<p>£</p>",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Research_income+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554282,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Other non-residential income (£)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Other_non_residential_income.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Other non-residential income (£)",
      "question": "What is the higher education providers other non-residential income?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about other non-residential income. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This data will be provided by HESA.<br><br>HEP income other non-residential includes all income from the Finance record Table 7<br>UK 'Income analysed by source' categorised as:<br><br>• Head 4ai 'BIS Research Councils, UK central government/local authorities, health and hospital authorities, EU government bodies' plus,<br>• Head 4aii 'Other' plus,<br>• Head 4c 'Grants from local authorities' plus,<br>• Head 4d 'Income from health and hospital authorities (excluding teaching contracts for student provision)' plus,<br>• Head 4e 'Other grant income' plus,<br>• Head 4f 'Capital grants recognised in the year' plus,<br>• Head 4g 'Income from intellectual property rights' plus,<br>• Head 4h 'Other operating income' plus,<br>• Head 5 'Investment income'",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Other_non_residential_income+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554291,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential income total (£)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_income_total.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential income total (£)",
      "question": "What is the higher education providers total non-residential income?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about total non-residential income. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This data will be provided by HESA.\r<br><br>Sum total of HESA supplied teaching income, HESA supplied research income, and HESA supplied other non-residential income.",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_income_total+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554300,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total expenditure (£)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_expenditure.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total expenditure (£)",
      "question": "What is the higher education providers total expenditure?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about total expenditure. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This data will be provided by HESA.\r<br><br>Total consolidated revenue expenditure of the HEP including staff costs, other operating expenditure, depreciation and interest payable. Sum total of HESA supplied non-residential expenditure, HESA supplied catering expenditure and HESA supplied residences expenditure.",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_expenditure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554309,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Teaching student headcount",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Teaching_student_headcount.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Teaching student headcount",
      "question": "What is the headcount of students on higher education taught courses?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains the headcount of students on higher education taught courses. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This data will be provided by HESA.\r<br><br>The headcount of students on higher education (HE) taught courses as defined for the Student record where Course.COURSEAIM begins E, M, H, I, J or C.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "student",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+HESA_Total_Amount_of_Energy_kWh_Consumed_per_Student.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Teaching_student_headcount+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554318,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Research student headcount",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Research_student_headcount.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Research student headcount",
      "question": "What is the headcount of higher education research students",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains the headcount of higher education research students. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This data will be provided by HESA.<br><br>The headcount of higher education (HE) research students as defined for the Student record where Course.COURSEAIM begins D or L.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "student",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Research_student_headcount+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554327,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Teaching student FTE",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Teaching_student_FTE.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Teaching student FTE",
      "question": "What is the full-time equivalent data for students on higher education taught courses?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains full-time equivalent data for students on higher education taught courses. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This data will be provided by HESA.\r<br><br>The full-time equivalence (FTE) of students on higher education (HE) taught courses as defined for the Student record where Course.COURSEAIM begins E, M, H, I, J or C.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "FTE",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Teaching_student_FTE+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554336,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Research student FTE",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Research_student_FTE.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Research student FTE",
      "question": "What is the full-time equivalent data for higher education research students?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains full-time equivalent data for higher education research students. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This data will be provided by HESA.\r<br><br>The full-time equivalence (FTE) of higher education research students as defined for the Student record where Course.COURSEAIM begins D or L.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "FTE",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Research_student_FTE+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554345,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total staff FTE",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_staff_FTE.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total staff FTE",
      "question": "What is the total full-time equivalent staff data?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains total full-time equivalent staff data. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total full-time equivalence (FTE) staff. Sum total of Non-residential staff FTE total and Residential staff FTE.<br>\r<br>Total full-time equivalence (FTE) staff includes all academic, research, support, administrative and technical staff. The staff in this field should relate to those used to compile the Finance record Table 8 UK 'Expenditure by activity and HESA cost centre'\r.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "staff",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_staff_FTE+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554354,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total number of sites",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_number_of_sites.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total number of sites",
      "question": "What is the higher education providers total number of sites?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total number of sites. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Figure for the whole estate.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "sites",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 11,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_number_of_sites+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554363,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total number of buildings",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_number_of_buildings.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total number of buildings",
      "question": "What is the total number of buildings for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total number of buildings. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total number of buildings for the whole estate. Sum total of Non-residential number of buildings and Residential number of buildings.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "buildings",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 11,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_number_of_buildings+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554372,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential number of buildings",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_number_of_buildings.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential number of buildings",
      "question": "What is the total number of non-residential buildings maintained and opened by the higher education provider?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the number of non-residential buildings. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the total number of non-residential buildings maintained and operated\r<br>by the HEP.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "buildings",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_number_of_buildings+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554381,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential number of buildings",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_number_of_buildings.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential number of buildings",
      "question": "What is the total number of residential buildings maintained and opened by the higher education provider?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the number of residential buildings. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is the total number of residential buildings maintained and opened by the HEP.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "buildings",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_number_of_buildings+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554390,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total site area (hectares)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_site_area_hectares.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total site area (hectares)",
      "question": "What is the total site area (in hectares)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total site area. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Figure for the whole estate.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "hectares",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_site_area_hectares+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554399,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total grounds area (hectares)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_grounds_area_hectares.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total grounds area (hectares)",
      "question": "What is the total grounds area (in hectares)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about total grounds area. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total grounds area for the whole estate.\r<br><br>The total hectarage of grounds (including residential areas) regularly maintained by the HEP. Include the area of surface level car parks, highways, operational farmland, listed or heritage areas and areas of ground water e.g. ponds, lakes and rivers, which are the maintenance responsibility of the HEP.\r<br><br>Exclude space allocated under Playing fields area, farmland held for investment or primarily commercial purposes and space which is left fallow (e.g. development sites, non-maintained woodland etc.) and any areas of water maintained by others e.g. Department for the Environment, British Waterways Board etc.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "hectares",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_grounds_area_hectares+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554408,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Grounds area water (hectares)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Grounds_area_water_hectares.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Grounds area water (hectares)",
      "question": "What is the total grounds area which is water (in hectares)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about grounds area which is water. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Surface area of water forms owned or managed by the HEP to the nearest 0.1ha for the total estate.\r<br><br>This must only include non-treated water sources and should therefore exclude fountains and other treated water features.\r<br><br>Include sustainable drainage systems (SUDS), but exclude water tanks for the storage of rain water or 'grey water'.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "hectares",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Grounds_area_water_hectares+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554417,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Grounds area listed or heritage (hectares)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Grounds_area_listed_or_heritage_hectares.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Grounds area listed or heritage (hectares)",
      "question": "What is total grounds area of landscaping which has listed or heritage status (in hectares)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about grounds area of landscaping which has listed or heritage status. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Area of landscaping owned or managed by the HEP with a Conservation Area/Listed Status or within English Heritage, Historic Scotland, CADW in Wales, The Register of Parks and Gardens, or The Register of Landscapes of Special Historic Interest.<br><br>This may include areas within listed buildings, such as quadrangles, but only if they have been listed separately.<br><br>Data should be rounded to the nearest 0.1 ha. This figure is for the whole estate.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "hectares",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Grounds_area_listed_or_heritage_hectares+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554426,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total playing fields area (hectares)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_playing_fields_area_hectares.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total playing fields area (hectares)",
      "question": "What is the total  playing fields area(in hectares)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total playing fields area. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total playing fields area for the whole estate.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "hectares",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_playing_fields_area_hectares+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554435,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total GIA (m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_GIA_m2.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total GIA (m2)",
      "question": "What is the total Gross Internal Area (GIA) of the whole estate (in m2)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total Gross Internal Area (GIA) of the whole estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government.",
      "methodology": "Total GIA for the whole estate. Sum total of Non-residential GIA and Residential GIA.<br>\r<br>Commercial space that can be separately identified as a discrete area together with all associated costs, staff, energy, waste, emissions etc. is considered non-returnable and should be excluded from the Estates management record.\r<br><br>Only in circumstances where commercial space cannot be identified in accordance with the aforementioned conditions is it considered returnable and should therefore be included in the Estates management record (together with all associated costs, staff, energy, waste, emissions etc.).\r<br><br>Please note that this field does not use Total GIA commercial space in the calculation. Any returnable commercial space is already included in Non-residential GIA and Residential GIA.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_GIA_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554444,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential GIA (m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_GIA_m2.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential GIA (m2)",
      "question": "What is the Gross Internal Area (GIA) of the non-residential estate (in m2)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the Gross Internal Area (GIA) of the non-residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, financial health monitoring and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Figure for the total non-residential estate. Enter the GIA of non-residential space in accordance with the inclusions under Non-residential NIA total.<br><br>Commercial space that can be separately identified as a discrete area together with all associated costs, staff, energy, waste, emissions etc. is considered non-returnable and should be excluded from the Estates management record.<br><br>Only in circumstances where commercial space cannot be identified in accordance with the aforementioned conditions is it considered returnable and should therefore be included in the Estates management record (together with all associated costs, staff, energy, waste, emissions etc.).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_GIA_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554453,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential GIA (m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_GIA_m2.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential GIA (m2)",
      "question": "What is the Gross Internal Area (GIA) of the residential estate (in m2)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the Gross Internal Area (GIA) of the residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government.",
      "methodology": "Figure for the residential estate. Enter the GIA of residential space in accordance with the inclusions under Residential NIA.<br><br>Commercial space that can be separately identified as a discrete area together with all associated costs, staff, energy, waste, emissions etc. is considered non-returnable and should be excluded from the Estates management record.<br><br>Only in circumstances where commercial space cannot be identified in accordance with the aforementioned conditions is it considered returnable and should therefore be included in the Estates management record (together with all associated costs, staff, energy, waste, emissions etc.).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_GIA_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554462,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential capital expenditure buildings (£)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_capital_expenditure_buildings.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential capital expenditure buildings (£)",
      "question": "What is the capital expenditure incurred on residences?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the capital expenditure incurred on residences. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This data will be provided by HESA.<br>\r<br>This figure is taken from the Finance record Table 9 UK 'Capital expenditure' sub-head 1a 'Residences operations (Buildings)'.\r<br><br>FSR definition\r<br>Residences (Buildings) includes capital expenditure incurred on residences.",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_capital_expenditure_buildings+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554471,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total energy consumption (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_energy_consumption_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total energy consumption (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total energy consumption for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total energy consumption for the whole estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Total energy consumption for the whole estate. Sum total of Energy consumption grid electricity, Energy consumption biofuels, Energy consumption burning oil, Energy consumption compressed natural gas, Energy consumption coal (industrial), Energy consumption fuel oil, Energy consumption gas oil, Energy consumption liquefied natural gas, Energy consumption liquefied petroleum gas, Energy consumption lubricants, Energy consumption natural gas excluding that used as input for a CHP unit, Energy consumption heat consumed from onsite CHP, Energy consumption electricity consumed from onsite CHP, Energy consumption other petroleum gas, Energy consumption petroleum coke, Energy consumption biomass, Energy consumption onsite photovoltaic, Energy consumption onsite wind, Energy consumption steam and hot water, and Energy consumption other onsite renewables.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+HESA_Total_Percentage_of_Renewable_Energy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+HESA_Total_Amount_of_Energy_kWh_Consumed_per_Student.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_energy_consumption_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554480,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption burning oil (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_burning_oil_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption burning oil (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total consumption of burning oil for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the consumption of burning oil. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate - burning oil (kWh).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_burning_oil_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554489,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption fuel oil (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_fuel_oil_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption fuel oil (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total consumption of fuel oil for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the consumption of fuel oil. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate - fuel oil (kWh).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_fuel_oil_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554498,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption gas oil (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_gas_oil_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption gas oil (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total consumption of gas oil for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the consumption of gas oil. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate from gas oil (kWh).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_gas_oil_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554507,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption compressed natural gas (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_compressed_natural_gas_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption compressed natural gas (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the consumption of natural gas for the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the consumption of compressed natural gas. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate - compressed natural gas (kWh).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 11,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_compressed_natural_gas_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554516,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption liquefied natural gas (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_liquefied_natural_gas_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption liquefied natural gas (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total consumption of liquefied natural gas for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the consumption of liquefied natural gas. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate - liquefied natural gas (kWh).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_liquefied_natural_gas_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554525,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption liquefied petroleum gas (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_liquefied_petroleum_gas_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption liquefied petroleum gas (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total consumption of liquefied petroleum gas for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate - liquefied petroleum gas (kWh).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_liquefied_petroleum_gas_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554534,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption natural gas excluding that used as input for a CHP unit (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_natural_gas_excluding_that_used_as_input_for_a_CHP_unit_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption natural gas excluding that used as input for a CHP unit (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total consumption of natural gas for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the consumption of natural gas. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate from natural gas (kWh).\r<br><br>Exlude natural gas that is used as input for a CHP unit.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_natural_gas_excluding_that_used_as_input_for_a_CHP_unit_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554543,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption natural gas used as input for a CHP unit (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_natural_gas_used_as_input_for_a_CHP_unit_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption natural gas used as input for a CHP unit (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total the consumption of natural gas used as input for a CHP?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the consumption of natural gas used as input for a CHP unit. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate - natural gas used as input for a CHP unit (kWh).\r<br><br>This will not be included in the energy consumption totals but the associated carbon emissions will be included in the scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions total.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_natural_gas_used_as_input_for_a_CHP_unit_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554552,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption other petroleum gas (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_other_petroleum_gas_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption other petroleum gas (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total consumption of other petroleum gas for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the consumption of other petroleum gas. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate - other petroleum gas (kWh).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_other_petroleum_gas_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554561,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption grid electricity (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_grid_electricity_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption grid electricity (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total consumption of grid electricty for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the grid electricity consumption. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate - grid electricity (kWh).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_grid_electricity_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554570,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption coal (industrial) (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_coal_industrial_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption coal (industrial) (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total consumption of energy from coal (industrial) for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the consumption of energy from coal (industrial). The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reson required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate - coal (industrial) (kWh).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_coal_industrial_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554579,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption steam and hot water (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_steam_and_hot_water_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption steam and hot water (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total consumption of  consumption of steam and hot water for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the consumption of steam and hot water. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate - steam and hot water (kWh).\r<br><br>Include district heating.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_steam_and_hot_water_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554588,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption other onsite renewables (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_other_onsite_renewables_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption other onsite renewables (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total consumption of other onsite renewables for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the consumption of other onsite renewables. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate - other onsite renewables (kWh).\r<br><br>Examples of other onsite renewables include solar thermal and ground source heat pumps.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+HESA_Total_Renewable_Energy_Consumed_kWh.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_other_onsite_renewables_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554597,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption lubricants (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_lubricants_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption lubricants (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total consumption of lubricants for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the consumption of lubricants. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate lubricants (kWh).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_lubricants_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554606,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption biofuels (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_biofuels_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption biofuels (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total consumption of biofuels ?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the consumption of biofuels. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate - biofuels (kWh).\r<br><br>Please state the type of biofuels and units.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+HESA_Total_Renewable_Energy_Consumed_kWh.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_biofuels_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554615,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption heat consumed from onsite CHP (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_heat_consumed_from_onsite_CHP_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption heat consumed from onsite CHP (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total heat consumed from onsite CHP for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about heat consumed from onsite CHP. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate - heat consumed from onsite CHP (kWh).\r<br><br>This will be included in the energy consumption totals but excluded from the scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+HESA_Total_Renewable_Energy_Consumed_kWh.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_heat_consumed_from_onsite_CHP_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554624,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption electricity consumed from onsite CHP (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_electricity_consumed_from_onsite_CHP_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption electricity consumed from onsite CHP (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total electricity consumption from onsite CHP for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about electricity consumed from onsite CHP. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate - electricity consumed from onsite CHP (kWh).\r<br><br>This will be included in the energy consumption totals but excluded from the scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_electricity_consumed_from_onsite_CHP_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554633,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption petroleum coke (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_petroleum_coke_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption petroleum coke (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total consumption of petroleum coke for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the consumption of petroleum coke. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate - petroleum coke (kWh).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_petroleum_coke_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554642,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption biomass (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_biomass_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption biomass (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total consumption of biomass for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the consumption of biomass. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate - biomass (kWh).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+HESA_Total_Renewable_Energy_Consumed_kWh.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_biomass_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554651,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption onsite photovoltaic (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_onsite_photovoltaic_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption onsite photovoltaic (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total consumption of onsite photovoltaic energy for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the consumption of onsite photovoltaic energy. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate - onsite photovoltaic (kWh).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+HESA_Total_Renewable_Energy_Consumed_kWh.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_onsite_photovoltaic_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554660,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Energy consumption onsite wind (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_onsite_wind_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Energy consumption onsite wind (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total consumption of onsite wind energy for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the consumption of onsite wind energy. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Energy consumption for the whole estate - onsite wind (kWh).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+HESA_Total_Renewable_Energy_Consumed_kWh.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Energy_consumption_onsite_wind_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554669,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential energy consumption total (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_energy_consumption_total_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential energy consumption total (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total energy consumption of the non-residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the energy consumption for the non-residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Figure for the energy consumption of the non-residential estate.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_energy_consumption_total_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554678,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential energy consumption total (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_energy_consumption_total_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential energy consumption total (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total energy consumption of the residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the energy consumption of the residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Figure for the energy consumption of the residential estate.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_energy_consumption_total_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554687,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles aviation spirit (litres)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Fuel_used_in_HEP_owned_vehicles_aviation_spirit_litres.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles aviation spirit (litres)",
      "question": "What is the total volume of aviation spirit used in the Higher Education Provider's owned vehicles?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the aviation spirit used in HEP-owned vehicles. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Fuel used in vehicles owned or leased by the HEP - aviation spirit (litres).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "litres",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Fuel_used_in_HEP_owned_vehicles_aviation_spirit_litres+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554696,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles aviation turbine fuel (litres)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Fuel_used_in_HEP_owned_vehicles_aviation_turbine_fuel_litres.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles aviation turbine fuel (litres)",
      "question": "What is the total volume of aviation turbine fuel used in the Higher Education Provider's owned vehicles?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the aviation turbine fuel used in HEP-owned vehicles. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Fuel used in vehicles owned or leased by the HEP - aviation turbine fuel (litres).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "litres",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Fuel_used_in_HEP_owned_vehicles_aviation_turbine_fuel_litres+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554705,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles biofuels (litres)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Fuel_used_in_HEP_owned_vehicles_biofuels_litres.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles biofuels (litres)",
      "question": "What is the total volume of biofuels used in the Higher Education Provider's owned vehicles?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the biofuels used in HEP-owned vehicles. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Fuel used in vehicles owned or leased by the HEP - biofuels (litres).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "litres",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Fuel_used_in_HEP_owned_vehicles_biofuels_litres+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554714,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles diesel (litres)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Fuel_used_in_HEP_owned_vehicles_diesel_litres.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles diesel (litres)",
      "question": "What is the total volume of diesel used in the Higher Education Provider's owned vehicles?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the diesel used in HEP-owned vehicles. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Fuel used in vehicles owned or leased by the HEP - diesel (retail station biofuel blend) (litres).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "litres",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Fuel_used_in_HEP_owned_vehicles_diesel_litres+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554723,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles liquefied petroleum gas (litres)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Fuel_used_in_HEP_owned_vehicles_liquefied_petroleum_gas_litres.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles liquefied petroleum gas (litres)",
      "question": "What is the total volume of  liquefied petroleum gas used in the Higher Education Provider's owned vehicles?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the liquefied petroleum gas used in HEP-owned vehicles. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Fuel used in vehicles owned or leased by the HEP - liquefied petroleum gas (litres).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "litres",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Fuel_used_in_HEP_owned_vehicles_liquefied_petroleum_gas_litres+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554732,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles petrol (litres)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Fuel_used_in_HEP_owned_vehicles_petrol_litres.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles petrol (litres)",
      "question": "What is the total volume of  petrol used in the Higher Education Provider's owned vehicles?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the petrol used in HEP-owned vehicles. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Fuel used in vehicles owned or leased by the HEP - petrol (retail station biofuel blend) (litres).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "litres",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Fuel_used_in_HEP_owned_vehicles_petrol_litres+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554741,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total fuel used in HEP owned vehicles (litres)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_fuel_used_in_HEP_owned_vehicles_litres.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total fuel used in HEP owned vehicles (litres)",
      "question": "What is the total volume of total fuel used in the Higher Education Provider's owned vehicles?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total fuel used in HEP-owned vehicles. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Total fuel used in vehicles owned or leased by the HEP for the whole estate. Sum total of Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles aviation spirit, Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles aviation turbine fuel, Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles biofuels, Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles diesel, Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles liquefied petroleum gas, and Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles petrol.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "litres",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_fuel_used_in_HEP_owned_vehicles_litres+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554750,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total generation of electricity exported to grid (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_generation_of_electricity_exported_to_grid_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total generation of electricity exported to grid (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total amount of electricity which has been generated and exported to the National Grid or a third party?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The field in this entity contains data about the generation of electricity that is exported to the National Grid for the whole estate. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.",
      "methodology": "This is renewable electricity, defined in kilowatt-hours (kWh), which has been generated and exported to the National Grid or a third party. This should not include generation of electricity by renewable resources that is consumed by the HEP and included in Energy consumption.<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance states that if an organisation is generating electricity and exporting it to the National Grid then an emission reduction should be reported. HESA will include this emission reduction when calculating scope 1 and 2<br>carbon emissions. HESA will use the following guidance when calculating the scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions:<br>• multiplying the consumption figures by the relevant conversion factor for that fuel,<br>• subtracting emissions equivalent to electricity generated and exported to the National Grid.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_generation_of_electricity_exported_to_grid_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554759,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total water consumption (m3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_water_consumption_m3.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total water consumption (m3)",
      "question": "What is the total water consumption of the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total water consumption of the whole estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: part of the move to mandatory reporting of scope 3 carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "Total water consumption for the whole estate. Sum total of Non-residential water consumption and Residential water consumption.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Water_Use.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Water_Use.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_water_consumption_m3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554768,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential water consumption (m3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_water_consumption_m3.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential water consumption (m3)",
      "question": "What is the total water consumption of the residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the water consumption of the residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: part of the move to mandatory reporting of scope 3 carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "Figure for the water consumption of the residential estate.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_water_consumption_m3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554777,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential water consumption (m3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_water_consumption_m3.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential water consumption (m3)",
      "question": "What is the total water consumption of the non-residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the water consumption of the non-residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: part of the move to mandatory reporting of scope 3 carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "Figure for the water consumption of the non-residential estate.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_water_consumption_m3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554786,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions for the whole estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions for the whole estate. Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from vehicles must be excluded from both Non-residential scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions total and Residential scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions total. A vehicle should not be given a non-residential or residential distinction for the purposes of the Estates management record. This ensures that the scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from vehicles are not double counted within Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions.<br><br>Sum total of Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions grid electricity, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions biofuels, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions burning oil, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions compressed natural gas, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions coal (industrial), Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions fuel oil, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions gas oil, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions liquefied natural gas, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions liquefied petroleum gas, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions lubricants, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions natural gas , Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions other petroleum gas, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions petroleum coke, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions biomass, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions onsite photovoltaic, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions onsite wind, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions steam and hot water, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions other onsite renewables, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles aviation spirit, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles aviation turbine fuel, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles biofuels, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles diesel, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles liquefied petroleum gas, and Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles petrol.<br><br>This field is calculated from the sum of each scope 1 and 2 carbon emission constituent as well as each of the scope 1 and 2 vehicle emissions (as listed above). It is anticipated that each of these emissions would have a residential and non-residential split (where applicable), therefore the expected total should match the sum total of Non-residential scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions total, Residential scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions total, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles aviation spirit, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles aviation turbine fuel, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles biofuels, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles diesel, Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles liquefied petroleum gas, and Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles petrol.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554795,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions burning oil (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_burning_oil_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions burning oil (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from burning oil for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from burning oil. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.\r<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from burning oil (kWh) for the whole estate.\r<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Energy consumption burning oil as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_burning_oil_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554804,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions fuel oil (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_fuel_oil_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions fuel oil (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from fuel oil for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from fuel oil. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from fuel oil (kWh) for the whole estate.<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Energy consumption fuel oil as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_fuel_oil_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554813,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions gas oil (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_gas_oil_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions gas oil (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from gas oil for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from gas oil. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from gas oil (kWh) for the whole estate.<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Energy consumption gas oil as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_gas_oil_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554822,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions compressed natural gas (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_compressed_natural_gas_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions compressed natural gas (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from compressed natural gas for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from compressed natural gas. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from compressed natural gas (kWh) for the whole estate.<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Energy consumption compressed natural gas as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_compressed_natural_gas_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554831,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions liquefied natural gas (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_liquefied_natural_gas_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions liquefied natural gas (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from liquefied natural gas for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from liquefied natural gas. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from liquefied natural gas (kWh) for the whole estate.<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Energy consumption liquefied natural gas as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_liquefied_natural_gas_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554840,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions liquefied petroleum gas (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_liquefied_petroleum_gas_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions liquefied petroleum gas (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from liquefied  petroleum gas for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from liquefied petroleum gas. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from liquefied petroleum gas (kWh) for the whole estate.<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Energy consumption liquefied petroleum gas as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_liquefied_petroleum_gas_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554849,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions lubricants (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_lubricants_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions lubricants (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from lubricants for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from lubricants. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from lubricants (kWh) for the whole estate.<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Energy consumption lubricants as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_lubricants_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554858,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions natural gas (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_natural_gas_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions natural gas (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from natural gas for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from natural gas. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from natural gas (kWh) for the whole estate.<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Energy consumption natural gas excluding that used as input for a CHP unit and Energy consumption natural gas used as input for a CHP unit as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_natural_gas_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554867,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions other petroleum gas (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_other_petroleum_gas_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions other petroleum gas (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from other petroleum gas for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from other petroleum gas. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from other petroleum gas (kWh) for the whole estate.<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Energy consumption other petroleum gas as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_other_petroleum_gas_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554876,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions grid electricity (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_grid_electricity_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions grid electricity (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from grid electricity for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from grid electricity. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from grid electricity (kWh) for the whole estate.<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Energy consumption grid electricity as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_grid_electricity_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554886,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions coal (industrial) (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_coal_industrial_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions coal (industrial) (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from coal (industrial) for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from coal (industrial). The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \n\nReason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.\r\n\nTotal scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from coal (industrial) (kWh) for the whole estate.\r\n\nThe Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Energy consumption coal (industrial) as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_coal_industrial_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554895,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions steam and hot water (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_steam_and_hot_water_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions steam and hot water (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from steam and hot water for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from steam and hot water. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.\r<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from steam and hot water (kWh) for the whole estate.\r<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Energy consumption steam and hot water as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_steam_and_hot_water_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554904,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions biofuels (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_biofuels_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions biofuels (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from biofuels for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from biofuels. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from biofuels (Kg CO2 per litre) for the whole estate.<br><br>If a figure was returned under Energy consumption biofuels (kWh), higher education providers (HEPs) will need to calculate the scope 1 and 2 emissions.<br><br>The consumption figure returned by the HEP should be broken down by the type of biofuel, the component figures multiplied by the corresponding Defra conversion factors to produce the scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions. The sum of these should then be returned in this field.<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance to support HEPs in returning this field can be found in the downloadable Excel spreadsheet, under the ‘Bioenergy’ tab.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_biofuels_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554913,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions petroleum coke (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_petroleum_coke_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions petroleum coke (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from petroleum coke for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from petroleum coke. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from petroleum coke (kWh) for the whole estate.<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Energy consumption petroleum coke as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_petroleum_coke_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554922,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions biomass (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_biomass_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions biomass (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from biomass for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from biomass. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from biomass (Kg CO2 per litre) for the whole estate.\r<br><br>If a figure was returned under Energy consumption biomass (kWh), higher education providers (HEPs) will need to calculate the scope 1 and 2 emissions.\r<br><br>The consumption figure returned by the HEP should be broken down by the type of biomass, the component figures multiplied by the corresponding Defra conversion factors to produce the scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions. The sum of these should then be returned in this field.\r<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance to support HEPs in returning this field can be found in the downloadable Excel spreadsheet, under the ‘Bioenergy’ tab.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_biomass_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554931,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions onsite photovoltaic (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_onsite_photovoltaic_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions onsite photovoltaic (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from onsite photovoltaic for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from onsite photovoltaic. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions for the whole estate from onsite photovoltaic.<br><br>A carbon conversion factor of 0 will be used as the emissions from Energy consumption onsite photovoltaic is 0.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_onsite_photovoltaic_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554942,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions onsite wind (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_onsite_wind_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions onsite wind (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from onsite wind for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from onsite wind. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions for the whole estate from onsite wind.<br><br>A carbon conversion factor of 0 will be used as the Energy consumption onsite wind is 0.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_onsite_wind_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554951,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions other onsite renewables (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_other_onsite_renewables_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions other onsite renewables (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from other onsite renewables for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from other onsite renewables. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from other onsite renewables (kWh) for the whole estate.<br><br>A carbon conversion factor of 0 will be used as the emissions from Energy consumption other onsite renewables is 0.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_other_onsite_renewables_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554960,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles aviation spirit (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_vehicles_aviation_spirit_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles aviation spirit (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from vehicles aviation spirit for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from aviation spirit used in HEP-owned vehicles. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from aviation spirit (litres) used in vehicles owned or leased by the HEP.<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles aviation spirit as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_vehicles_aviation_spirit_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554969,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles aviation turbine fuel (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_vehicles_aviation_turbine_fuel_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles aviation turbine fuel (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from vehicles aviation turbine fuel for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from aviation turbine fuel used in HEP-owned vehicles. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.\r<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from aviation turbine fuel type (litres) used in vehicles owned or leased by the HEP.\r<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles aviation turbine fuel as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_vehicles_aviation_turbine_fuel_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554978,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles biofuels (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_vehicles_biofuels_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles biofuels (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from vehicles biofuels for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 emissions from biofuels used in HEP-owned vehicles. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 1 and 2 emissions from biofuels used in vehicles owned or leased by the HEP.<br><br>If a figure was returned under Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles biofuels (litres), higher education providers (HEPs) will need to calculate the scope 1 and 2 emissions.<br><br>The consumption figure returned by the HEP should be broken down by the type of biofuel, the component figures multiplied by the corresponding Defra conversion factors to produce the scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions. The sum of these should then be returned in this field.<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance to support HEPs in returning this field can be found in the downloadable Excel spreadsheet, under the ‘Bioenergy’ tab.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_vehicles_biofuels_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554987,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles diesel (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_vehicles_diesel_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles diesel (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from vehicles diesel for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from diesel used in HEP-owned vehicles. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.\r<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from diesel (retail station biofuel blend) (litres) used in vehicles owned or leased by the HEP.\r<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles diesel as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_vehicles_diesel_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2554996,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles liquefied petroleum gas (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_vehicles_liquefied_petroleum_gas_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles liquefied petroleum gas (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from vehicles liquefied petroleum gas for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from liquefied petroleum gas used in HEP-owned vehicles. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.\r<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from liquefied petroleum gas (litres) used in vehicles owned or leased by the HEP.\r<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles liquefied petroleum gas as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_vehicles_liquefied_petroleum_gas_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555005,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles petrol (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_vehicles_petrol_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions vehicles petrol (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from vehicles petrol gas for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from petrol used in HEP-owned vehicles. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.\r<br><br>Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from petrol (retail station biofuel blend) (litres) used in vehicles owned or leased by the HEP.\r<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Fuel used in HEP owned vehicles petrol as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_vehicles_petrol_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555014,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions total (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_total_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions total (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions for the non-residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions for the non-residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions of the non-residential estate only. <br><br>Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from vehicles must be excluded from both Non-residential scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions total and Residential scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions total. A vehicle should not be given a non-residential or residential distinction for the purposes of the Estates management record. This ensures that the scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from vehicles are not double counted within Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions. <br><br>HEPs will need to enter this figure (as the breakdown collected in Estates management record is not sufficient to enable HESA to calculate this).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_total_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555023,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions total (Kg CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_total_Kg_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions total (Kg CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions for the residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions for the residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for advice to Government, monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets and for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions of the residential estate only.\r<br><br>Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from vehicles must be excluded from both Non-residential scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions total and Residential scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions total. A vehicle should not be given a non-residential or residential distinction for the purposes of the Estates management record. This ensures that the scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions from vehicles are not double counted within Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions.\r<br><br>HEPs will need to enter this figure (as the breakdown collected in Estates management record is not sufficient to enable HESA to calculate this).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_scope_1_and_2_carbon_emissions_total_Kg_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555032,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential volume of wastewater (m3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_volume_of_wastewater_m3.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential volume of wastewater (m3)",
      "question": "What is the total volume of wastewater for the non-residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the volume of wastewater for the non-residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: part of the move to mandatory reporting of scope 3 carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the volume of wastewater for the non-residential estate only.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_volume_of_wastewater_m3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555041,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential volume of wastewater (m3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_volume_of_wastewater_m3.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential volume of wastewater (m3)",
      "question": "What is the total volume of wastewater for the residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the volume of wastewater for the residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: part of the move to mandatory reporting of scope 3 carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the volume of wastewater for the residential estate only.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_volume_of_wastewater_m3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555050,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total volume of wastewater (m3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_volume_of_wastewater_m3.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total volume of wastewater (m3)",
      "question": "What is the total volume of wastewater for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total volume of wastewater for the whole estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: part of the move to mandatory reporting of scope 3 carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "Total volume of wastewater for the whole estate. Sum total of Non-residential volume of wastewater and Residential volume of wastewater.\r<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total scope 3 carbon emissions from wastewater treatment is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_volume_of_wastewater_m3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555059,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel air (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_air_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel air (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from air travel (domestic, short haul and international)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from air travel (domestic, short haul and international). The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 business travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from air travel (domestic, short haul and international).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_air_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555068,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel rail (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_rail_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel rail (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from rail travel (domestic and international)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from rail travel (domestic and international). The value can be recorded to three decimal places.<br> This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 business travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from rail travel (domestic and international).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_rail_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555077,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel grey fleet (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_grey_fleet_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel grey fleet (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from grey fleet (individuals reimbursed for using their private vehicles)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from grey fleet (individuals reimbursed for using their private vehicles). The value can be recorded to three decimal places.<br> This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 business travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from grey fleet (individuals reimbursed for using their private vehicles).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_grey_fleet_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555086,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel leased pools cars (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_leased_pools_cars_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel leased pools cars (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from leased pools cars?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from leased pools cars. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.<br> This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 business travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from leased pools cars classed as scope 3 travel emissions.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_leased_pools_cars_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555095,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel company cars (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_company_cars_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel company cars (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from company cars?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from company cars. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 business travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from company cars classed as scope 3 travel emissions.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_company_cars_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555104,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel leased motorcycles or mopeds (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_leased_motorcycles_or_mopeds_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel leased motorcycles or mopeds (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from leased motorcycles or mopeds?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from leased motorcycles or mopeds. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. <br>This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 business travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from leased motorcycles or mopeds classed as scope 3 emissions.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_leased_motorcycles_or_mopeds_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555113,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel leased vans (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_leased_vans_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel leased vans (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from leased vans?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from leased vans. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 business travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from leased vans classed as scope 3 travel emissions.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_leased_vans_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555122,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel leased buses (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_leased_buses_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel leased buses (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from leased buses?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from leased buses. The  value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 business travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from leased buses classed as scope 3 travel emissions.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_leased_buses_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555131,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel public bus (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_public_bus_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel public bus (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the tscope 3 carbon emissions from public bus?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from public bus. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 business travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from public bus.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_public_bus_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555140,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel underground (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_underground_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel underground (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from underground?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from underground. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 business travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from underground",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_underground_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555149,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel tram (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_tram_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel tram (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions of an higher education provider from trams?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions of an higher education provider (HEP) from trams. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 business travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from trams.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_tram_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555158,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel taxi (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_taxi_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel taxi (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from taxis?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from taxis. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.<br> This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 business travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from taxis.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_taxi_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555167,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel coach (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_coach_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel coach (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from coaches?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from coaches. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 business travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from coaches.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_coach_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555176,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel ferry (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_ferry_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from business travel ferry (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions of an higher education provider from ferries?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the business travel scope 3 carbon emissions of an higher education provider (HEP) from ferries. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 business travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from ferries.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_business_travel_ferry_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555185,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by air (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_air_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by air (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by air (domestic, short haul and international)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by air (domestic, short haul and international). The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (academic and support staff) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from air travel (domestic, short haul and international).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_air_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555194,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by rail (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_rail_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by rail (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by  rail travel (domestic and international)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by rail (domestic and international). The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (academic and support staff) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from rail travel (domestic and international).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_rail_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555203,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by trams (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_trams_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by trams (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by  trams?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by tram. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (academic and support staff) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from trams.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_trams_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555212,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by underground (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_underground_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by underground (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by  underground?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by underground. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (academic and support staff) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from underground.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_underground_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555221,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by public bus (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_public_bus_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by public bus (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by public bus?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by public  bus. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (academic and support staff) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from public bus.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_public_bus_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555230,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by coach (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_coach_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by coach (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by coach?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by coach. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (academic and support staff) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from coach.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_coach_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555239,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by car (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_car_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by car (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by car?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by car. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (academic and support staff) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from car.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_car_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555248,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by taxi (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_taxi_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by taxi (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by taxi?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by taxi. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (academic and support staff) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from taxi.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_taxi_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555257,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by motorcycle or moped (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_motorcycle_or_moped_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by motorcycle or moped (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by motorcycle or moped?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by motorcycle or moped. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (academic and support staff) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from motorcycle or moped.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_motorcycle_or_moped_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555266,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by ferry (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_ferry_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by ferry (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by ferry?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from staff commuting by ferry. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (academic and support staff) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from ferry.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_staff_commuting_by_ferry_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555275,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by air (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_air_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by air (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by air (domestic, short-haul and international)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by air (domestic, short-haul and international). The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (student) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from air travel (domestic, short haul and international).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_air_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555284,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by rail (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_rail_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by rail (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by rail travel (domestic and international)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by rail (domestic and international). The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (student) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from rail travel (domestic and international).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_rail_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555293,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by trams (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_trams_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by trams (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by trams?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions of an higher education provider's (HEP's) students commuting by trams. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (student) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from trams.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_trams_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555302,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by underground (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_underground_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by underground (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by underground?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by underground. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (student) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from underground.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_underground_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555311,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by public bus (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_public_bus_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by public bus (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by public bus?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by public bus. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (student) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from public bus.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_public_bus_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555320,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by coach (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_coach_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by coach (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by coach?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by coach. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (student) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from coach.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_coach_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555329,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by car (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_car_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by car (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by car?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by car. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (student) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from car.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_car_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555338,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by taxi (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_taxi_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by taxi (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by taxi?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by taxi. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (student) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from taxi.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_taxi_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555347,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by motorcycle or moped (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_motorcycle_or_moped_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by motorcycle or moped (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by motorcycle or moped?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by motorcycle or moped. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (student) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from motorcycle or moped.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_motorcycle_or_moped_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555356,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by ferry (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_ferry_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by ferry (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by ferry?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from students commuting by ferry. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 commuter (student) travel greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from ferry.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_students_commuting_by_ferry_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555365,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential scope 3 carbon emissions from waste (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_waste_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential scope 3 carbon emissions from waste (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total non-residential scope 3 carbon emissions from waste?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about non-residential scope 3 carbon emissions from waste. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from waste for the non-residential estate only.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_waste_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555374,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential scope 3 carbon emissions from waste (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_waste_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential scope 3 carbon emissions from waste (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total residential scope 3 carbon emissions from waste?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about residential scope 3 carbon emissions from waste. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from waste for the residential estate only.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_waste_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555383,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total scope 3 carbon emissions from waste (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_waste_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total scope 3 carbon emissions from waste (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from waste?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about total scope 3 carbon emissions from waste. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from waste for the whole estate. Sum total of Non-residential scope 3 carbon emissions from waste and Residential scope 3 carbon emissions from waste.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_waste_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555392,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential method used to calculate scope 3 carbon emissions from waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_method_used_to_calculate_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_waste.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential method used to calculate scope 3 carbon emissions from waste",
      "question": "Which approach has been used to calculate the data returned in Non-residential scope 3 carbon emissions from waste?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the method used to calculate non-residential scope 3 carbon emissions from waste. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Indicate which approach has been used to calculate the data returned in Non-residential scope 3 carbon emissions from waste.<br>• 'Basic approach' should be used where waste data is very limited for both residential and non-residential properties,<br>• 'Medium approach': should be used where waste data and recycling data is available for non-residential and/or residential buildings,<br>• 'Detailed approach': should be used where good quality waste in-house data is available.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "RichText",
        "Medium",
        "Detailed"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_method_used_to_calculate_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555401,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential method used to calculate scope 3 carbon emissions from waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_method_used_to_calculate_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_waste.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential method used to calculate scope 3 carbon emissions from waste",
      "question": "Which approach has been used to calculate the data returned in Residential scope 3 carbon emissions from waste?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the method used to calculate scope 3 carbon emissions from waste for the residential estate. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Indicate which approach has been used to calculate the data returned in Residential scope 3 carbon emissions from waste.<br>• 'Basic approach' should be used where waste data is very limited for both residential and non-residential properties,<br>• 'Medium approach': should be used where waste data and recycling data is available for non-residential and/or residential buildings,<br>• 'Detailed approach': should be used where good quality waste in-house data is available.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "RichText",
        "Medium",
        "Detailed",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_method_used_to_calculate_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555410,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total method used to calculate scope 3 carbon emissions from waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_method_used_to_calculate_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_waste.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total method used to calculate scope 3 carbon emissions from waste",
      "question": "Which approach has been used to calculate the data returned in Total scope 3 carbon emissions from waste?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the method used to calculate scope 3 carbon emissions from waste for the total estate. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Indicate which approach has been used to calculate the data returned in Total scope 3 carbon emissions from waste.<br>• 'Basic approach' should be used where waste data is very limited for both residential and non-residential properties,<br>• 'Medium approach': should be used where waste data and recycling data is available for non-residential and/or residential buildings,<br>• 'Detailed approach': should be used where good quality waste in-house data is available.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "RichText",
        "Medium",
        "Detailed"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_method_used_to_calculate_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555419,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential scope 3 carbon emissions from water supply (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_water_supply_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential scope 3 carbon emissions from water supply (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from water supply for the non-residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from water supply for the non-residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: part of the move to mandatory reporting of scope 3 carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.\r<br><br>This figure is for the scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from the supply for water of the non-residential estate only.\r<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Non-residential water consumption as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_water_supply_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555428,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential scope 3 carbon emissions from water supply (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_water_supply_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential scope 3 carbon emissions from water supply (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from water supply for the residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from water supply for the residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: part of the move to mandatory reporting of scope 3 carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.\r<br><br>This figure is for the scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from the supply of water for the residential estate only.\r<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for Residential water consumption as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_water_supply_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555437,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total scope 3 carbon emissions from water supply (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_water_supply_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total scope 3 carbon emissions from water supply (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions of from water supply for the total estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions of from water supply for the total estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: part of the move to mandatory reporting of scope 3 carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "Total energy consumption for the whole estate. Sum total of Non-residential scope 3 carbon emissions from water supply and Residential scope 3 carbon emissions from water supply.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_water_supply_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555446,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total scope 3 carbon emissions from wastewater treatment (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_wastewater_treatment_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total scope 3 carbon emissions from wastewater treatment (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 carbon emissions from wastewater treatment for the total estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about scope 3 carbon emissions from wastewater treatment for the total estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: part of the move to mandatory reporting of scope 3 carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "This conversion will be undertaken by HESA.\r<br><br>Total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from the treatment of wastewater for the whole estate (kWh).\r<br><br>The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factor that will be used for the sum total of Total volume of wastewater, Total water supply grey water and rain water, and Total water borehole extraction as well as supplemental information.\r<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for the fields Total volume of wastewater, Total water supply grey water and rain water and Total water borehole extraction to ensure that this mandatory field is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_wastewater_treatment_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555455,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain business services (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_business_services_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain business services (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) from the supply chain business services?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from the supply chain business services. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from the supply chain business services.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_business_services_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555464,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain paper products (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_paper_products_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain paper products (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) from the supply chain paper products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from the supply chain paper products. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from the supply chain paper products.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_paper_products_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555473,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain other manufactured products (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_other_manufactured_products_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain other manufactured products (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) from the supply chain other manufactured products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from the supply chain other manufactured products. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from the supply chain other manufactured products.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_other_manufactured_products_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555482,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain manufactured fuels, chemicals, and gases (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_manufactured_fuels_chemicals_and_gases_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain manufactured fuels, chemicals, and gases (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) from the supply chain manufactured fuels, chemicals, and gases?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from the supply chain manufactured fuels, chemicals, and gases. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from the supply chain manufactured fuels, chemicals, and gases.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_manufactured_fuels_chemicals_and_gases_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555491,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain food and catering (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_food_and_catering_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain food and catering (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) from the supply chain food and catering?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from the supply chain food and catering. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from the supply chain food and catering.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_food_and_catering_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555500,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain construction (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_construction_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain construction (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) from the supply chain construction?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from the supply chain construction. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from the supply chain construction.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_construction_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555509,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain information and communication technologies (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_information_and_communication_technologies_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain information and communication technologies (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) from the supply chain information and communication technologies?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from the supply chain information and communication technologies. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from the supply chain information and communication technologies.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_information_and_communication_technologies_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555518,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain waste and water (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_waste_and_water_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain waste and water (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) from supply chain waste and water?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from the supply chain waste and water. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from supply chain waste and water.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_waste_and_water_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555527,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain medical and precision instruments (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_medical_and_precision_instruments_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain medical and precision instruments (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) from supply chain medical and precision instruments?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from the supply chain medical and precision instruments. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from supply chain medical and precision instruments.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_medical_and_precision_instruments_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555536,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain other procurement (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_other_procurement_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain other procurement (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) from the supply chain other procurement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from the supply chain other procurement. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from the supply chain other procurement. The Defra conversion factors and guidance provide the conversion factors as well as supplemental information.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 7,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_other_procurement_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555545,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain unclassified (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_unclassified_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Scope 3 carbon emissions from supply chain unclassified (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) from the supply chain of unclassified items?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 3 carbon emissions from the supply chain of unclassified items. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) from the supply chain of unclassified items.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 7,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Scope_3_carbon_emissions_from_supply_chain_unclassified_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555554,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total carbon reduction target (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_carbon_reduction_target.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total carbon reduction target (%)",
      "question": "What is the total carbon reduction target?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the carbon reduction target. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for monitoring progress towards sector carbon targets.",
      "methodology": "Carbon reduction target for scope 1 and 2 emissions to 2020 against a 2005 baseline for the whole estate.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_carbon_reduction_target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555563,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total scope 1 and 2 emission baseline for 2005 (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_scope_1_and_2_emission_baseline_for_2005_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total scope 1 and 2 emission baseline for 2005 (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the scope 1 and 2 emission baseline in total greenhouse gas emissions (tonnes) for 2005?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the scope 1 and 2 emission baseline for 2005. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.",
      "methodology": "Scope 1 and 2 emission baseline for 2005 for the whole estate.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_scope_1_and_2_emission_baseline_for_2005_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555572,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total number of car parking spaces",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_number_of_car_parking_spaces.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total number of car parking spaces",
      "question": "What is the total number of car parking spaces for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the number of car parking spaces for the whole estate. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total number of car parking spaces for the whole estate. Sum total of Non-residential number of car parking spaces and Residential number of car parking spaces.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "quanity",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 11,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_number_of_car_parking_spaces+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555581,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential number of car parking spaces",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_number_of_car_parking_spaces.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential number of car parking spaces",
      "question": "What is the total number of car parking spaces for the non-residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field describes the number of car parking spaces for the non-residential estate. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Number of car parking spaces for the non-residential estate.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "quanity",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_number_of_car_parking_spaces+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555590,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential number of car parking spaces",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_number_of_car_parking_spaces.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential number of car parking spaces",
      "question": "What is the total number of car parking spaces for the residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the number of car parking spaces for the residential estate. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Number of car parking spaces for the residential estate.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "quanity",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_number_of_car_parking_spaces+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555599,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total percentage of renewable energy purchased through green tariffs (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_percentage_of_renewable_energy_purchased_through_green_tariffs.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total percentage of renewable energy purchased through green tariffs (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of renewable energy purchased via green tariffs for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the percentage of renewable energy purchased via green tariffs for the whole estate. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Percentage of renewable energy purchased through green tariffs (Climate Change Levy exempt) for the whole estate.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_percentage_of_renewable_energy_purchased_through_green_tariffs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555608,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total energy generated onsite by CHP (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_energy_generated_onsite_by_CHP_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total energy generated onsite by CHP (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total annual energy (kWh equivalent) generated onsite from combined heat and power (CHP)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the energy generated onsite from combined heat and power (CHP). The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total annual energy (kWh equivalent) generated onsite from combined heat and power (CHP).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+HESA_Total_Renewable_Energy_Consumed_kWh.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_energy_generated_onsite_by_CHP_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555617,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total renewable energy generated onsite or offsite (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_renewable_energy_generated_onsite_or_offsite_kWh.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total renewable energy generated onsite or offsite (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total annual energy (kWh equivalent) generated through renewable energy sources for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field describes the renewable energy generated on or offsite either by the HEP independently or in partnership with others. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total annual energy (kWh equivalent) generated through renewable energy sources for the whole estate.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_renewable_energy_generated_onsite_or_offsite_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555626,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Use of renewable energy generated onsite or offsite where the ROCs are retained or not claimed (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Use_of_renewable_energy_generated_onsite_or_offsite_where_the_ROCs_are_retained_or_not_claimed.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Use of renewable energy generated onsite or offsite where the ROCs are retained or not claimed (%)",
      "question": "What percentage contribution where ROCs are retained or not claimed by an HEP for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the energy generated through renewable energy sources where Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROCs) are retained or not claimed by an HEP. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Percentage contribution where ROCs are retained or not claimed by an HEP for the whole estate.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Use_of_renewable_energy_generated_onsite_or_offsite_where_the_ROCs_are_retained_or_not_claimed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555635,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Use of renewable energy generated onsite or offsite where the ROCs are sold (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Use_of_renewable_energy_generated_onsite_or_offsite_where_the_ROCs_are_sold.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Use of renewable energy generated onsite or offsite where the ROCs are sold (%)",
      "question": "What percentage contribution where the ROCS are sold by an HEP for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the energy generated through renewable energy sources where the Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROCs) are sold by an HEP. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Percentage contribution where the ROCS are sold by an HEP for the whole estate.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Use_of_renewable_energy_generated_onsite_or_offsite_where_the_ROCs_are_sold+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555644,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total waste mass (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_waste_mass_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total waste mass (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total waste mass for the whole estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics and as part of the move to mandatory reporting of scope 3 carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "Total waste mass for the whole estate. Sum total of Non-residential waste mass total, Residential waste mass total, and Other works waste mass total.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for the fields Non-residential waste mass total, Residential waste mass total and Other works waste mass total to ensure that this mandatory field is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_waste_mass_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555653,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total waste mass recycled (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_waste_mass_recycled_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total waste mass recycled (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (tonnes) for the whole estate that is sent for recycling?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total waste mass for the whole estate that is sent for recycling. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics and as part of the move to mandatory reporting of scope 3 carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "Total waste mass (tonnes) for the whole estate that is sent for recycling. Sum total Non-residential waste mass recycled, Residential waste mass recycled, and Other works waste mass recycled.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for the fields Non-residential waste mass recycled, Residential waste mass recycled and Other works waste mass recycled to ensure that this mandatory field is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_waste_mass_recycled_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555662,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total waste mass incineration (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_waste_mass_incineration_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total waste mass incineration (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (tonnes) for the whole estate that is incinerated?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total waste mass for the whole estate that is incinerated. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics and as part of the move to mandatory reporting of scope 3 carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "Total waste mass (tonnes) for the whole estate that is incinerated. Sum total Non-residential waste mass incineration, Residential waste mass incineration, and Other works waste mass incineration.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for the fields Non-residential waste mass incineration, Residential waste mass incineration and Other works waste mass incineration to ensure that this mandatory field is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_waste_mass_incineration_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555671,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total waste mass composting (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_waste_mass_composting_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total waste mass composting (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (tonnes) for the whole estate that is composted?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total waste mass for the whole estate that is composted. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics and as part of the move to mandatory reporting of scope 3 carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "Total waste mass (tonnes) for the whole estate that is composted. Sum total Non-residential waste mass composting, Residential waste mass composting, and Other works waste mass composting.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for the fields Non-residential waste mass composting, Residential waste mass composting and Other works waste mass composting to ensure that this mandatory field is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_waste_mass_composting_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555680,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total waste mass anaerobic digestion (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_waste_mass_anaerobic_digestion_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total waste mass anaerobic digestion (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (tonnes) for the whole estate that is sent for anaerobic digestion?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total waste mass for the whole estate that is sent for anaerobic digestion. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics and as part of the move to mandatory reporting of scope 3 carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "Total waste mass (tonnes) for the whole estate that is sent for anaerobic digestion. Sum total Non-residential waste mass anaerobic digestion, Residential waste mass anaerobic digestion, and Other works waste mass anaerobic digestion.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for the fields Non-residential waste mass anaerobic digestion, Residential waste mass anaerobic digestion and Other works waste mass anaerobic digestion to ensure that this mandatory field is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_waste_mass_anaerobic_digestion_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555689,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total waste mass landfill (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_waste_mass_landfill_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total waste mass landfill (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (tonnes) for the whole estate that is sent to landfill?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total waste mass for the whole estate that is sent to landfill. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics and as part of the move to mandatory reporting of scope 3 carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "Total waste mass (tonnes) for the whole estate that is sent to landfill. Sum total Non-residential waste mass landfill, Residential waste mass landfill, and Other works waste mass landfill.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for the fields Non-residential waste mass landfill, Residential waste mass landfill and Other works waste mass landfill to ensure that this mandatory field is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_waste_mass_landfill_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555698,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total waste mass other (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_waste_mass_other_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total waste mass other (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (tonnes) for the whole estate that is disposed of by other offsite methods?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total waste mass for the whole estate that is disposed of by other methods offsite. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics and as part of the move to mandatory reporting of scope 3 carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "Total waste mass (tonnes) for the whole estate that is disposed of by other offsite methods. Sum total Non-residential waste mass other, Residential waste mass other, and Other works waste mass other.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for the fields Non-residential waste mass other, Residential waste mass other and Other works waste mass other to ensure that this mandatory field is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_waste_mass_other_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555707,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total waste mass used to create energy (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_waste_mass_used_to_create_energy_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total waste mass used to create energy (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (tonnes) for the whole estate that is used to create energy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total waste mass for the whole estate that is used to create energy. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: for use in producing Capital Investment Framework (CIF) metrics and as part of the move to mandatory reporting of scope 3 carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "Total waste mass (tonnes) for the whole estate that is used to create energy. Sum total Non-residential waste mass used to create energy, Residential waste mass used to create energy, and Other works waste mass used to create energy.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for the fields Non-residential waste mass used to create energy, Residential waste mass used to create energy and Other works waste mass used to create energy to ensure that this mandatory field is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_waste_mass_used_to_create_energy_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555716,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential waste mass total (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_waste_mass_total_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential waste mass total (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass from the non-residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total waste mass from the non-residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total non-residential waste mass. Sum total of Non-residential waste mass recycled, Non-residential waste mass incineration, Non-residential waste mass composting, Non-residential waste mass anaerobic digestion, Non-residential waste mass landfill, Non residential waste mass used to create energy, and Non-residential waste mass other.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_waste_mass_total_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555725,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential waste mass recycled (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_waste_mass_recycled_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential waste mass recycled (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from the non-residential estate that is sent for recycling?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from the non-residential estate that is sent for recycling. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from the non-residential estate that is sent for recycling.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass recycled is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_waste_mass_recycled_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555734,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential waste mass incineration (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_waste_mass_incineration_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential waste mass incineration (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from the non-residential estate that is incinerated?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from the non-residential estate that is incinerated. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from the non-residential estate that is incinerated.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass incineration is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_waste_mass_incineration_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555743,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential waste mass composting (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_waste_mass_composting_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential waste mass composting (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from the non-residential estate that is composted (either onsite or offsite)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from the non-residential estate that is composted. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from the non-residential estate that is composted (either onsite or offsite).<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass composting is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_waste_mass_composting_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555752,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential waste mass anaerobic digestion (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_waste_mass_anaerobic_digestion_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential waste mass anaerobic digestion (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from the non-residential estate that is anaerobically digested (either onsite or offsite)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from the non-residential estate that is sent for anaerobic digestion. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from the non-residential estate that is anaerobically digested (either onsite or offsite).<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass anaerobic digestion is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_waste_mass_anaerobic_digestion_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555761,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential waste mass landfill (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_waste_mass_landfill_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential waste mass landfill (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from the non-residential estate that is sent to landfill?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from the non-residential estate that is sent to landfill. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from the non-residential estate that is sent to landfill.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass landfill is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_waste_mass_landfill_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555770,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential waste mass other (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_waste_mass_other_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential waste mass other (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from the non-residential estate that is disposed of by other offsite methods?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the other waste mass from the non-residential estate that is disposed of by other offsite methods. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from the non-residential estate that is disposed of by other offsite methods. This may include mechanical biological treatment and offsite autoclave.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass other is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_waste_mass_other_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555779,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential waste mass used to create energy (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_waste_mass_used_to_create_energy_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential waste mass used to create energy (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from the non-residential estate that is used to create energy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from the non-residential estate that is used to create energy. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from the non-residential estate that is used to create energy e.g. used for Biomass boilers or CHP. Exclude waste that is incinerated with no energy recovery.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass used to create energy is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_waste_mass_used_to_create_energy_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555788,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential waste mass total (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_waste_mass_total_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential waste mass total (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total residential waste mass for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total waste mass from the residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total residential waste mass for the whole estate. Sum total of Residential waste mass recycled, Residential waste mass incineration, Residential waste mass composting, Residential waste mass anaerobic digestion, Residential waste mass landfill, Residential waste mass used to create energy, and Residential waste mass other.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_waste_mass_total_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555797,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential waste mass recycled (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_waste_mass_recycled_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential waste mass recycled (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from the residential estate that is sent for recycling?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from the residential estate that is sent for recycling. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from the residential estate that is sent for recycling.\r<br>\r<br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass recycled is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_waste_mass_recycled_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555806,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential waste mass incineration (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_waste_mass_incineration_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential waste mass incineration (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from the residential estate that is incinerated?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from the residential estate that is incinerated. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from the residential estate that is incinerated.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass incineration is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_waste_mass_incineration_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555815,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential waste mass composting (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_waste_mass_composting_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential waste mass composting (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from the residential estate that is composted (either onsite or offsite)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from the residential estate that is composted. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from the residential estate that is composted (either onsite or offsite).<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass composting is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_waste_mass_composting_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555824,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential waste mass anaerobic digestion (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_waste_mass_anaerobic_digestion_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential waste mass anaerobic digestion (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from the residential estate that is anaerobically digested (either onsite or offsite)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from the residential estate that is sent for anaerobic digestion. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from the residential estate that is anaerobically digested (either onsite or offsite).<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass anaerobic digestion is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_waste_mass_anaerobic_digestion_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555833,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential waste mass landfill (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_waste_mass_landfill_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential waste mass landfill (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from the residential estate that is sent to landfill?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from the residential estate that is sent to landfill. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from the residential estate that is sent to landfill.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass landfill is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_waste_mass_landfill_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555842,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential waste mass other (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_waste_mass_other_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential waste mass other (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from the residential estate that is disposed of by other offsite methods?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from the residential estate that is disposed of by other offsite methods. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from the residential estate that is disposed of by other offsite methods. This may include mechanical biological treatment and offsite autoclave.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass other is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_waste_mass_other_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555851,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential waste mass used to create energy (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_waste_mass_used_to_create_energy_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential waste mass used to create energy (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from the residential estate that is used to create energy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from the residential estate that is used to create energy. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from the residential estate that is used to create energy e.g. used for Biomass boilers or CHP. Exclude waste that is incinerated with no energy recovery.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass used to create energy is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_waste_mass_used_to_create_energy_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555860,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Other works waste mass total (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Other_works_waste_mass_total_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Other works waste mass total (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass all works of construction, demolition, and excavation not captured elsewhere?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total waste mass from all works of construction, demolition and excavation not elsewhere captured. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total waste mass all works of construction, demolition, and excavation not captured elsewhere. Sum total of Other works waste mass recycled, Other works waste mass incineration, Other works waste mass composting, Other works waste mass anaerobic digestion, Other works waste mass landfill, Other works waste mass used to create energy, and Other works waste mass other.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Other_works_waste_mass_total_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555869,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Other works waste mass recycled (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Other_works_waste_mass_recycled_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Other works waste mass recycled (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from all works of construction, demolition, and excavation not captured elsewhere that is sent for recycling?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from the all works of construction, demolition and excavation not elsewhere captured that is sent for recycling. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from all works of construction, demolition, and excavation not captured elsewhere that is sent for recycling.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass recycled is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Other_works_waste_mass_recycled_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555878,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Other works waste mass incineration (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Other_works_waste_mass_incineration_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Other works waste mass incineration (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from all works of construction, demolition, and excavation not captured elsewhere that is incinerated?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from all works of construction, demolition and excavation not elsewhere captured that is incinerated. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from all works of construction, demolition, and excavation not captured elsewhere that is incinerated.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass incineration is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Other_works_waste_mass_incineration_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555887,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Other works waste mass composting (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Other_works_waste_mass_composting_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Other works waste mass composting (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from all works of construction, demolition, and excavation not captured elsewhere that is composted (either onsite or offsite)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from all works of construction, demolition and excavation not elsewhere captured that is composted. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from all works of construction, demolition, and excavation not captured elsewhere that is composted (either onsite or offsite).<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass composting is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Other_works_waste_mass_composting_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555896,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Other works waste mass anaerobic digestion (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Other_works_waste_mass_anaerobic_digestion_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Other works waste mass anaerobic digestion (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from all works of construction, demolition, and excavation not captured elsewhere that is sent for anaerobically digestion?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from all works of construction, demolition and excavation not elsewhere captured that is sent for anaerobic digestion. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from all works of construction, demolition, and excavation not captured elsewhere that is sent for anaerobically digestion.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass anaerobic digestion is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Other_works_waste_mass_anaerobic_digestion_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555905,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Other works waste mass landfill (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Other_works_waste_mass_landfill_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Other works waste mass landfill (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from all works of construction, demolition, and excavation not captured elsewhere that is sent to landfill?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from all works of construction, demolition and excavation not elsewhere captured that is sent to landfill. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from all works of construction, demolition, and excavation not captured elsewhere that is sent to landfill.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass landfill is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Other_works_waste_mass_landfill_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555914,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Other works waste mass other (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Other_works_waste_mass_other_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Other works waste mass other (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from all works of construction, demolition, and excavation not captured elsewhere that is disposed of by other offsite methods?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from all works of construction, demolition and excavation not elsewhere captured that is disposed of by other offsite methods. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from all works of construction, demolition, and excavation not captured elsewhere that is disposed of by other offsite methods. This may include mechanical biological treatment and offsite autoclave.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass other is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Other_works_waste_mass_other_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555923,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Other works waste mass used to create energy (tonnes)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Other_works_waste_mass_used_to_create_energy_tonnes.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Other works waste mass used to create energy (tonnes)",
      "question": "What is the total waste mass (in tonnes) from all works of construction, demolition, and excavation not captured elsewhere that is used to create energy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the waste mass from all works of construction, demolition and excavation not elsewhere captured that is used to create energy. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "This figure is for the waste mass (tonnes) from all works of construction, demolition, and excavation not captured elsewhere that is used to create energy e.g. used for Biomass boilers or CHP. Exclude waste that is incinerated with no energy recovery.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total waste mass used to create energy is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Other_works_waste_mass_used_to_create_energy_tonnes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555932,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Environmental management system existence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Environmental_management_system_existence.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Environmental management system existence",
      "question": "Does the higher education providers have an externally verified environmental management system?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the existence of an environmental management system. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Does the HEP have an externally verified environmental management system?<br>• 'Yes' must be used when the HEP has an externally verified environmental management system,<br>• 'No' must be used when the HEP does not have an externally verified environmental management system.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Environmental_management_system_existence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555941,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Environmental management system external verification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Environmental_management_system_external_verification.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Environmental management system external verification",
      "question": "What are the name(s) of the system which the higher education provider's environmental management system is externally verified?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This field contains data about the external verification of an environmental management system. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Return the name of the system which the HEP's environmental management system is externally verified to. Valid entires include:<br>• Acorn BS8555 partial<br>• Acorn BS8555 full<br>• Eco Campus Bronze<br>• Eco Campus Silver<br>• Eco Campus Gold<br>• Eco Campus Platinum<br>• EMAS<br>• Green Dragon<br>• ISO14001<br>• Other<br>If other, please include details in the comments box.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Acorn BS8555 partial",
        "Acorn BS8555 full",
        "Eco Campus Bronze",
        "Eco Campus Silver",
        "Eco Campus Gold",
        "Eco Campus Platinum",
        "EMAS",
        "Green Dragon",
        "ISO14001",
        "Other"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Environmental_management_system_external_verification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555950,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Environmental management system external verification coverage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Environmental_management_system_external_verification_coverage.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Environmental management system external verification coverage",
      "question": "If the higher education provider (HEP) has a externally verified environmental management system, is this system for the whole HEP?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the coverage of an environmental management system. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "If the HEP has a externally verified environmental management system, is this system for the whole HEP?<br>• 'Yes' must be used when the HEP has an externally verified environmental management system which covers the whole estate,<br>• 'No' must be used when the HEP does not have an externally verified environmental management system which covers the whole estate.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "NA"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Environmental_management_system_external_verification_coverage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555959,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Environmental reporting total",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Environmental_reporting_total.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Environmental reporting total",
      "question": "Does the higher education provider (HEP) report publicly on the website on its environmental performance?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the public reporting, or not, on the HEP's website of its environmental performance. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Does the HEP report publicly on the website on its environmental performance?<br><br>This may be through Business in the Community, the Global Reporting initiative or against formally agreed and publicly available targets.<br>• 'Yes' must be used when the HEP's environmental performance is displayed on it's website,<br>• 'No' must be used when the HEP's environmental performance is not displayed on it's website.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Environmental_reporting_total+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555968,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Fairtrade accreditation existence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Fairtrade_accreditation_existence.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Fairtrade accreditation existence",
      "question": "Does the higher education provider (HEP) have a Fairtrade certification?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the existence, or not, of an HEP's Fairtrade accreditation. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "The existence of a Fairtrade certification for the HEP. This must relate to entire whole estate i.e. including the Student Union.\r<br>• 'Yes' must be used when the HEP has Fairtrade accreditation,\r<br>• 'No' must be used when the HEP does not have Fairtrade accreditation.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Fairtrade_accreditation_existence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555977,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Percentage modal split for commuting by staff single occupancy car journey (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_staff_single_occupancy_car_journey.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Percentage modal split for commuting by staff single occupancy car journey (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage modal split of staff commuting by single occupancy car journey?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the percentage modal split of staff commuting by single occupancy car journey. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100.  This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Estimated % of academic and support staff who travel to and from their main place of work at the HEP by single occupancy car journey. This should not include business travel.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_staff_single_occupancy_car_journey+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555986,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Percentage modal split for commuting by staff car share (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_staff_car_share.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Percentage modal split for commuting by staff car share (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage modal split of staff commuting by car share?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the percentage modal split of staff commuting by car share. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Estimated % of academic and support staff who travel to and from their main place of work at the HEP by car share. This should not include business travel.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_staff_car_share+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2555995,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Percentage modal split for commuting by staff bus (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_staff_bus.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Percentage modal split for commuting by staff bus (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage modal split of staff commuting by bus?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the percentage modal split of staff commuting by bus. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Estimated % of academic and support staff who travel to and from their main place of work at the HEP by bus. This should not include business travel.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_staff_bus+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556004,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Percentage modal split for commuting by staff train (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_staff_train.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Percentage modal split for commuting by staff train (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage modal split of staff commuting by train?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the percentage modal split of staff commuting by train. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Estimated % of academic and support staff who travel to and from their main place of work at the HEP by train. This should not include business travel.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_staff_train+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556013,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Percentage modal split for commuting by staff cycle (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_staff_cycle.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Percentage modal split for commuting by staff cycle (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage modal split of staff commuting by bicycle?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the percentage modal split of staff commuting by bicycle. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100.  This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Estimated % of academic and support staff who travel to and from their main place of work at the HEP by bicycle. This should not include business travel.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_staff_cycle+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556022,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Percentage modal split for commuting by staff walk (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_staff_walk.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Percentage modal split for commuting by staff walk (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage modal split of staff commuting by walking?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the percentage modal split of staff commuting by walking. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Estimated % of academic and support staff who travel to and from their main place of work at the HEP by walking. This should not include business travel.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_staff_walk+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556031,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Percentage modal split for commuting by staff motorbike (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_staff_motorbike.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Percentage modal split for commuting by staff motorbike (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage modal split of staff commuting by motorbike?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the percentage modal split of staff commuting by motorbike. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Estimated % of academic and support staff who travel to and from their main place of work at the HEP by motorbike. This should not include business travel.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_staff_motorbike+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556040,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Percentage modal split for commuting by staff other (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_staff_other.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Percentage modal split for commuting by staff other (%)",
      "question": "What is the  percentage modal split of staff commuting by means other than single occupancy car journey, car share, bus, train, cycle, walking or motorbike?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the percentage modal split of staff commuting by means other than single occupancy car journey, car share, bus, train, cycle, walking or motorbike. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100.  This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Estimated % of academic and support staff who travel to and from their main place of work at the HEP by means other than single occupancy car journey, car share, bus, train, cycle, walking or motorbike. This should not include business travel.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_staff_other+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556049,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Percentage modal split for commuting by students single occupancy car journey (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_students_single_occupancy_car_journey.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Percentage modal split for commuting by students single occupancy car journey (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage modal split for commuting by students single occupancy car journey?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the percentage modal split of students commuting by single occupancy car journey. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Estimated % of students who travel to and from their term-time address to the HEP by single occupancy car journey. <br><br>This should not include travel from their term-time address to their home (holiday) address.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_students_single_occupancy_car_journey+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556058,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Percentage modal split for commuting by students car share (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_students_car_share.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Percentage modal split for commuting by students car share (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage modal split for commuting by students car share?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the percentage modal split of students commuting by car share. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Estimated % of students who travel to and from their term-time address to the HEP by car share. <br><br>This should not include travel from their term-time address to their home (holiday) address.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_students_car_share+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556067,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Percentage modal split for commuting by students bus (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_students_bus.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Percentage modal split for commuting by students bus (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage modal split for commuting by students bus?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the percentage modal split of students commuting by bus. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Estimated % of students who travel to and from their term-time address to the HEP by bus. <br><br>This should not include travel from their term-time address to their home (holiday) address.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_students_bus+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556076,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Percentage modal split for commuting by students train (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_students_train.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Percentage modal split for commuting by students train (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage modal split for commuting by students train?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the percentage modal split of students commuting by train. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Estimated % of students who travel to and from their term-time address to the HEP by train. <br><br>This should not include travel from their term-time address to their home (holiday) address.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_students_train+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556085,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Percentage modal split for commuting by students cycle (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_students_cycle.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Percentage modal split for commuting by students cycle (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage modal split for commuting by students cycle?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the percentage modal split of students commuting by bicycle. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Estimated % of students who travel to and from their term-time address to the HEP by bicycle. <br><br>This should not include travel from their term-time address to their home (holiday) address.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_students_cycle+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556094,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Percentage modal split for commuting by students walk (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_students_walk.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Percentage modal split for commuting by students walk (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage modal split for commuting by students walk?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the percentage modal split of students commuting by walking. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Estimated % of students who travel to and from their term-time address to the HEP by walking. <br><br>This should not include travel from their term-time address to their home (holiday) address.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_students_walk+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556103,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Percentage modal split for commuting by students motorbike (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_students_motorbike.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Percentage modal split for commuting by students motorbike (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage modal split for commuting by students motorbike?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the percentage modal split of students commuting by motorbike. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Estimated % of students who travel to and from their term-time address to the HEP by motorbike. <br><br>This should not include travel from their term-time address to their home (holiday) address.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_students_motorbike+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556112,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Percentage modal split for commuting by students other (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_students_other.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Percentage modal split for commuting by students other (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage modal split for commuting by students other?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the percentage modal split of students commuting by means other than single occupancy car journey, car share, bus, train, cycle, walking or motorbike. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Estimated % of students who travel to and from their term-time address to the HEP by means other than single occupancy car journey, car share, bus, train, cycle, walking or motorbike. <br><br>This should not include travel from their term-time address to their home (holiday) address.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Percentage_modal_split_for_commuting_by_students_other+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556121,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total number of cycle spaces",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_number_of_cycle_spaces.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total number of cycle spaces",
      "question": "What is the total number of cycle spaces for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total number of cycle spaces for the whole estate. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total number of cycle spaces for the whole estate.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Cycle spaces",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 11,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_number_of_cycle_spaces+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556130,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total water supply grey water and rain water (m3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_water_supply_grey_water_and_rain_water_m3.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total water supply grey water and rain water (m3)",
      "question": "What is the total water supply 'grey water' and rain water for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the water supply from 'grey water' and rain water. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total water supply 'grey water' and rain water for the whole estate.<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total scope 3 carbon emissions from wastewater treatment is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_water_supply_grey_water_and_rain_water_m3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556139,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Total water borehole extraction (m3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_water_borehole_extraction_m3.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Total water borehole extraction (m3)",
      "question": "What is the total water supply borehole extraction for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the total water borehole extraction for the whole estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total water supply borehole extraction for the whole estate of the HEP.\r<br><br>Please note that HEPs in England, Northern Ireland or Wales will need to return a value for this field to ensure that the mandatory field Total scope 3 carbon emissions from wastewater treatment is calculated correctly.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Total_water_borehole_extraction_m3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556148,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Borehole water used for irrigation (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Borehole_water_used_for_irrigation.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Borehole water used for irrigation (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of borehole water used for irrigation and therefore not classed as wastewater?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the percentage of borehole water used for irregation for the whole estate. The value can be recorded to one decimal place and must be between 0 and 100. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "% of borehole water used for irrigation and therefore not classed as wastewater.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Borehole_water_used_for_irrigation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556157,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential GIA in DEC or EPC category A (m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_A_m2.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential GIA in DEC or EPC category A (m2)",
      "question": "What is the GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category A for the non-residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category A for the non-residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Non-residential GIA in DEC/(EPC - Scotland only) Category A.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_A_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556166,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential GIA in DEC or EPC category B (m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_B_m2.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential GIA in DEC or EPC category B (m2)",
      "question": "What is the GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category B for the non-residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category B for the non-residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Non-residential GIA in DEC/(EPC - Scotland only) Category B.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_B_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556175,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential GIA in DEC or EPC category C (m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_C_m2.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential GIA in DEC or EPC category C (m2)",
      "question": "What is the GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category C for the non-residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category C for the non-residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Non-residential GIA in DEC/(EPC - Scotland only) Category C.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_C_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556184,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential GIA in DEC or EPC category D (m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_D_m2.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential GIA in DEC or EPC category D (m2)",
      "question": "What is the GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category D for the non-residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category D for the non-residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Non-residential GIA in DEC/(EPC - Scotland only) Category D.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_D_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556193,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential GIA in DEC or EPC category E (m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_E_m2.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential GIA in DEC or EPC category E (m2)",
      "question": "What is the GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category E for the non-residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category E for the non-residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\rThis is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Non-residential GIA in DEC/(EPC - Scotland only) Category E.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_E_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556202,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential GIA in DEC or EPC category F (m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_F_m2.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential GIA in DEC or EPC category F (m2)",
      "question": "What is the GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category F for the non-residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category F for the non-residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Non-residential GIA in DEC/(EPC - Scotland only) Category F.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_F_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556211,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Non-residential GIA in DEC or EPC category G (m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_G_m2.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Non-residential GIA in DEC or EPC category G (m2)",
      "question": "What is the GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category G for the non-residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category G for the non-residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Non-residential GIA in DEC/(EPC - Scotland only) Category G.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Non_residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_G_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556220,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential GIA in DEC or EPC category A (m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_A_m2.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential GIA in DEC or EPC category A (m2)",
      "question": "What is the GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category A for the residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category A for the residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\rThis is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Residential GIA in DEC/(EPC - Scotland only) Category A.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_A_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556229,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential GIA in DEC or EPC category B (m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_B_m2.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential GIA in DEC or EPC category B (m2)",
      "question": "What is the GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category B for the residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category B for the residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Residential GIA in DEC/(EPC - Scotland only) Category B.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_B_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556238,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential GIA in DEC or EPC category C (m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_C_m2.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential GIA in DEC or EPC category C (m2)",
      "question": "What is the GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category C for the residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category C for the residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Residential GIA in DEC/(EPC - Scotland only) Category C.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_C_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556247,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential GIA in DEC or EPC category D (m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_D_m2.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential GIA in DEC or EPC category D (m2)",
      "question": "What is the GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category D for the residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category D for the residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Residential GIA in DEC/(EPC - Scotland only) Category D.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_D_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556256,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential GIA in DEC or EPC category E (m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_E_m2.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential GIA in DEC or EPC category E (m2)",
      "question": "What is the GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category E for the residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category E for the residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Residential GIA in DEC/(EPC - Scotland only) Category E.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_E_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556265,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential GIA in DEC or EPC category F (m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_F_m2.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential GIA in DEC or EPC category F (m2)",
      "question": "What is the GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category F for the residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category F for the residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Residential GIA in DEC/(EPC - Scotland only) Category F.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_F_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556274,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+Residential GIA in DEC or EPC category G (m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_G_m2.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "Residential GIA in DEC or EPC category G (m2)",
      "question": "What is the GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category G for the residential estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about GIA in DEC or EPC (Scotland only) which falls under rating category G for the residential estate. The value can be recorded to three decimal places.\r This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Residential GIA in DEC/(EPC - Scotland only) Category G.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m2",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+Residential_GIA_in_DEC_or_EPC_category_G_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556283,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+EU Emissions Trading Scheme participation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+EU_Emissions_Trading_Scheme_participation.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "EU Emissions Trading Scheme participation",
      "question": "Does the higher education provider participate in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the participation or not in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Does the HEP participate in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme?<br>• 'Yes' must be used when the HEP participates in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme,<br>• 'No' must be used when the HEP does not participate in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+EU_Emissions_Trading_Scheme_participation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556292,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+EU Emissions Trading Scheme carbon allowance bought or sold (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+EU_Emissions_Trading_Scheme_carbon_allowance_bought_or_sold_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "EU Emissions Trading Scheme carbon allowance bought or sold (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total carbon allowance bought or sold in phase 3 (tonnes of CO2e) for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the carbon allowance bought or sold as part of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total carbon allowance bought or sold in phase 3 (tonnes of CO2e) for the whole estate.<br><br>Launched in 2005, the EU Emissions Trading Scheme is now in its third phase, running from 2013 to 2020. A major revision approved in 2009 in order to strengthen the system means the phase 3 is significantly different from phases 1 and 2 and is based on rules which are far more harmonised than before. The main changes are:<br>• A single, EU-wide cap on emissions applies in place of the previous system of national caps<br>• Auctioning, not free allocation, is now the default method for allocating allowances. In 2013 more than 40% of allowances will be auctioned, and this share will rise progressively each year.<br>• For those allowances still given away for free, harmonised allocation rules apply which are based on ambitious EU-wide benchmarks of emissions performance.<br>• Some more sectors and gases are included.<br>• 300 million allowances set aside in the New Entrants Reserve to fund the deployment of innovative renewable energy technologies as well as carbon capture and storage through the NER 300 programme.<br> <br>Further information on the EU Emissions Trading Scheme can be found on the European Commission website.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+EU_Emissions_Trading_Scheme_carbon_allowance_bought_or_sold_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556301,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+EU Emissions Trading Scheme carbon allowance (tonnes CO2e)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+EU_Emissions_Trading_Scheme_carbon_allowance_tonnes_CO2e.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "EU Emissions Trading Scheme carbon allowance (tonnes CO2e)",
      "question": "What is the total carbon allowance in phase 3 (tonnes of CO2e) for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the carbon allowance as part of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. The value can be recorded to three decimal places. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. <br><br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total carbon allowance in phase 3 (tonnes of CO2e) for the whole estate.<br><br>Launched in 2005, the EU Emissions Trading Scheme is now in its third phase, running from 2013 to 2020. A major revision approved in 2009 in order to strengthen the system means the phase 3 is significantly different from phases 1 and 2 and is based on rules which are far more harmonised than before. The main changes are:<br>• A single, EU-wide cap on emissions applies in place of the previous system of national caps<br>• Auctioning, not free allocation, is now the default method for allocating allowances. In 2013 more than 40% of allowances will be auctioned, and this share will rise progressively each year.<br>• For those allowances still given away for free, harmonised allocation rules apply which are based on ambitious EU-wide benchmarks of emissions performance.<br>• Some more sectors and gases are included.<br>• 300 million allowances set aside in the New Entrants Reserve to fund the deployment of innovative renewable energy technologies as well as carbon capture and storage through the NER 300 programme.<br><br>Further information on the EU Emissions Trading Scheme can be found on the European Commission website.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+EU_Emissions_Trading_Scheme_carbon_allowance_tonnes_CO2e+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2556310,
      "name": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)+EU Emissions Trading Scheme cost (£)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+EU_Emissions_Trading_Scheme_cost.json",
      "designer": "Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)",
      "title": "EU Emissions Trading Scheme cost (£)",
      "question": "What is the total cost of compliance with the EU Emissions Trading Scheme for the whole estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This field contains data about the cost of compliance with the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. This is applicable to higher education providers (HEP) in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. \r<br>\r<br>Reason required: sector use and benchmarking.",
      "methodology": "Total cost of compliance with the EU Emissions Trading Scheme for the whole estate.",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_Education_Statistics_Agency_HESA+EU_Emissions_Trading_Scheme_cost+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2558014,
      "name": "Amnesty International+Due Diligence beyond 3TG",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Due_Diligence_beyond_3TG.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "Due Diligence beyond 3TG",
      "question": "Do the company’s due diligence policies / practices cover minerals other than columbite-tantalite, coltan, cassiterite, gold, wolframite, tantalum, tin or tungsten?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company’s due diligence policies/practices extend beyond the minerals defined as “Conflict Minerals” by the Dodd-Frank Act.</p><p>To answer this metric you should first find the relevant document from the company that sets out their policies and practices regarding their supply chain due diligence (if such a document is not already available on Wikirate). The name of this document varies from company to company, it might be called something like “Supply chain code of conduct“, “Human Rights Policy“, “Responsible Sourcing policy“ or “Supplier Responsibility Standard“. Add this document as a source.</p><p>Within this document, find the part that defines which minerals are covered by due diligence (try searching for the 3TG terms below)</p><p>Value options:</p><p><strong>Yes - </strong>the company’s due diligence policies cover minerals other than those listed (columbite-tantalite, coltan, cassiterite, gold, wolframite, tantalum, tin or tungsten). Please add a comment that describes which additional minerals/materials are covered by the policy, and quote from the source where possible. Example: [[http://images.apple.com/supplier-responsibility/pdf/supplier_responsibility_standards.pdf|Apple’s supplier responsibility standard]] which covers “additional minerals or materials notified to Suppliers by Apple”: , p84 onwards</p><p><strong>No - </strong>the company’s due diligence policies / practices only covers the listed minerals. Example: [[https://www.tesla.com/about/legal?redirect=no#human-rights-and-conflict-minerals-policy|Tesla’s human rights and conflict minerals policy]]  </p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 35,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 32,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Due_Diligence_beyond_3TG+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2558168,
      "name": "Amnesty International+Due diligence beyond DRC region",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Due_diligence_beyond_DRC_region.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "Due diligence beyond DRC region",
      "question": "Do the company’s due diligence policies / practices cover countries other than the Democratic Republic of the Congo and its adjoining / neighbouring countries (e.g., Angola, Burundi, Central African Republic, the Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company’s due diligence policies/practices extend beyond the area covered by the Dodd-Frank Act - the Democratic Republic of the Congo and its adjoining / neighbouring countries (e.g., Angola, Burundi, Central African Republic, the Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia).</p><p>To answer this metric you should first find the relevant document from the company that sets out their policies and practices regarding their supply chain due diligence (if such a document is not already available on Wikirate). The name of this document varies from company to company, it might be called something like “Supply chain code of conduct“, “Human Rights Policy“, “Responsible Sourcing policy“ or “Supplier Responsibility Standard“. Add this document as a source.</p><p>Within this document, find the part that defines which countries are covered by due diligence (try searching for DRC and adjoining countries)</p><p>Value options:</p><p><strong>Yes - </strong>the company’s due diligence policy / policies covers countries other than those listed (Angola, Burundi, Central African Republic, the Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia). Please add a comment that describes which additional minerals/materials are covered by the policy, and quote from the source where possible. Example: [[http://images.apple.com/supplier-responsibility/pdf/supplier_responsibility_standards.pdf|Apple’s supplier responsibility standard]] which covers that originate from or through “High Risk Regions”, p84 onwards</p><p><strong>No -</strong> the company’s due diligence policies / practices only covers the listed countries. Example: [[https://www.tesla.com/about/legal?redirect=no#human-rights-and-conflict-minerals-policy|Tesla’s human rights and conflict minerals policy]]</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 35,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 32,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+Due_diligence_beyond_DRC_region+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2615395,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+SDG8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG8_Decent_Work_and_Economic_Growth_Actions.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "SDG8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) Actions",
      "question": "Did the company's report describe activities which contribute to achieving SDG8: Decent Work and Economic Growth?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>[[http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/economic-growth/|UN Sustainable Development Goal 8: Promote inclusive and sustainable economic growth, employment and decent work for all]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The purpose of this metric is to record actions that a company has taken which contribute to [[https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg8|SDG8]].</p><p>“Actions“ in this context are loosely defined, and the list of relevant actions is a work in progress, please add new response options (through “Update Value Type“) when you see an action which isn’t covered by any of the existing options. The question of what “counts“ as a relevant action for a particular SDG is an open one, and this metric can be used as a space for collaboratively figuring that out.</p><p>To add data for this metric, please select the appropriate categories from the list and&nbsp;<strong>include quotations from the report&nbsp;</strong>that give more detail on the actions. If you see a relevant action in a company’s report that isn’t represented in the current list of options, consider adding a new option for it, following the instructions above.</p><p></p><p>List of possible answers and description of what they mean:</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG8_Decent_Work_and_Economic_Growth_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2615411,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+SDG12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG12_Responsible_Consumption_and_Production_Actions.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "SDG12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) Actions",
      "question": "Did the company's report describe activities which contribute to achieving SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production? (Please list)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>[[http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-consumption-production/|UN Sustainable Development Goal 12: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The purpose of this metric is to record actions that a company has taken which contribute to [[https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg12|SDG12]].</p><p>“Actions“ in this context are loosely defined, and the list of relevant actions is a work in progress, please add new response options (through “Update Value Type“) when you see an action which isn’t covered by any of the existing options. The question of what “counts“ as a relevant action for a particular SDG is an open one, and this metric can be used as a space for collaboratively figuring that out.</p><p>To add data for this metric, please select the appropriate categories from the list and&nbsp;<strong>include quotations from the report&nbsp;</strong>that give more detail on the actions. If you see a relevant action in a company’s report that isn’t represented in the current list of options, consider adding a new option for it, following the instructions above.</p><p></p><p>List of possible answers and description of what they mean:</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 17,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 7,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG12_Responsible_Consumption_and_Production_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2615760,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+SDG11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG11_Sustainable_Cities_and_Communities_Actions.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "SDG11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) Actions",
      "question": "Did the company's report describe activities which contribute to achieving SDG11: Sustainable Cities and Communities? (Please list)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>[[http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/cities/|UN Sustainable Development Goal 11: Make cities inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The purpose of this metric is to record actions that a company has taken which contribute to [[https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg11|SDG11]].</p><p>“Actions“ in this context are loosely defined, and the list of relevant actions is a work in progress, please add new response options (through “Update Value Type“) when you see an action which isn’t covered by any of the existing options. The question of what “counts“ as a relevant action for a particular SDG is an open one, and this metric can be used as a space for collaboratively figuring that out.</p><p>To add data for this metric, please select the appropriate categories from the list and&nbsp;<strong>include quotations from the report&nbsp;</strong>that give more detail on the actions. If you see a relevant action in a company’s report that isn’t represented in the current list of options, consider adding a new option for it, following the instructions above.</p><p></p><p>List of possible answers and description of what they mean:</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG11_Sustainable_Cities_and_Communities_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2621098,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+SDG5 (Gender Equality) Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG5_Gender_Equality_Actions.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "SDG5 (Gender Equality) Actions",
      "question": "Which actions did the company report on which are relevant to addressing SDG 5 (Gender Equality)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The purpose of this metric is to record actions that a company has taken which contribute to [[https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg5|SDG 5 - Gender Equality]].</p><p>“Actions“ in this context are loosely defined, and the list of relevant actions is a work in progress, please add new response options (through “Update Value Type“) when you see an action which isn’t covered by any of the existing options. The question of what “counts“ as a relevant action for a particular SDG is an open one, and this metric can be used as a space for collaboratively figuring that out.</p><p>To add data for this metric, please select the appropriate categories from the list and <strong>include quotations from the report </strong>that give more detail on the actions.</p><p></p><p>List of possible answers and description of what they mean:</p><p><strong>Policy on discrimination that covers gender discrimination - </strong>does the company’s report reference a policy on discrimination that covers gender discrimination? If so, copy and paste details of this policy in a comment.</p><p><strong>Reports on female representation in workforce - </strong>does the company’s report say what percentage of the workforce is female? Is this broken down by category (e.g. female representation in management, on the board?). Quote details in comment.</p><p>{{examples for Reports on female representation in workforce|closed; hide: closed_content}}</p><p><strong>Targets for female representation in workforce: </strong>does the company’s report set targets for female representation in the workforce? Generally or in relation to a specific type of workers (e.g. management)?</p><p><strong>Initiative(s) that aim to increase female representation in workforce: </strong>does the company’s report describe any initiatives that are designed to increase female representation or address specific barriers to women working in particular roles?</p><p>{{examples for <strong>Initiative(s) that aim to increase female representation in workforce</strong>|closed; hide: closed_content}}</p><p><strong>New or updated parental leave policy: </strong>Does the report describe the company’s parental leave policies - specifically any changes to these policies which are intended to improve gender equality.</p><p><strong>Reporting on gender pay gap: </strong>Does the company’s report give details of any pay gap between male and female employees?</p><p><strong>Addressing gender pay gap: </strong>Does the company’s report describe any initiatives which specifically address the gender pay gap?</p><p><strong>Financial support of relevant external initiatives/organisations: </strong>Does the company’s report describe any external initiatives/organisations which aim to promote gender equality that have been supported financially by the company?</p><p><strong>Non-financial support of relevant external initiatives/organisations: </strong>Does the company’s report describe any external initiatives/organisations which aim to promote gender equality that have been supported by the company in ways other than financial support (e.g. provision of in-kind benefits, company staff participation)?</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Policy on discrimination that covers gender discrimination",
        "Reports on female representation in workforce",
        "Targets for female representation in workforce",
        "Initiiative(s) that aim to increase female representation in workforce",
        "New or updated maternity policy",
        "Reporting on gender pay gap",
        "Addressing gender pay gap",
        "Financial support of relevant external initiatives/organisations",
        "Non-financial support of relevant external initiatives/organisations"
      ],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG5_Gender_Equality_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642111,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Institutional Control",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Institutional_Control.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Institutional Control",
      "question": "Which type of control mechanism applies to the institution?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Operational characteristics, like the type of control mechanism, are variables that provide information about the context in which the institution operates. Institutions should report the most recent data available within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the type of control mechanism that applies to the institution:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research.</p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time.<br></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics </strong>- to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Institutional Boundary</strong>. <br></p></li><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the control mechanism that applies to the institution</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>public, private</em>, and <em>control</em>.<br></p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p><p></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information</p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Public",
        "Private for profit",
        "Private non-profit"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Institutional_Control+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642120,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+IECC Climate Region",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+IECC_Climate_Region.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "IECC Climate Region",
      "question": "In which type of IECC climate region is the institution located?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Operational characteristics, like the type of IECC climate region, are variables that provide information about the context in which the institution operates. Institutions should report the most recent data available within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission.",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the type of IECC climate region in which the institution is located:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the[[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research<br></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time.</p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Operational Characteristics</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses<strong> the type of IECC climate region in which the institution is located</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>IECC, </em>and<em> climate.</em></p><p></p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p><p></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information<br></p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p>Climate zones are consistent with the climate designations used by the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) and the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE). <br>The zones correspond to these generalized climate categories:<br>1 - Very Hot<br>2 - Hot<br>3 - Warm<br>4 - Mixed<br>5 - Cool<br>6 - Cold<br>7 - Very Cold<br>8 - Subarctic<br><br>For further guidance, see [[|IECC/ASHRAE Climate Zones]] (U.S) and [[|ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007]]<br>(international).</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Very Hot",
        "Hot",
        "Warm",
        "Mixed",
        "Cool",
        "Cold",
        "Very Cold",
        "Subarctic"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+IECC_Climate_Region+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642131,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Electricity from Geothermal (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Electricity_from_Geothermal.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Electricity from Geothermal (%)",
      "question": "What percentage (%) electricity used by the institution is generated from geothermal?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "For most institutions, energy consumption is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, which cause global climate change. Global climate change is having myriad negative impacts throughout the world, including increased frequency and potency of extreme weather events, sea level rise, species extinction, water shortages, declining agricultural production, ocean acidification, and spread of diseases. The impacts are particularly pronounced for vulnerable and poor communities and countries. In addition to causing global climate change, energy generation from fossil fuels, especially coal, produces air pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury, dioxins, arsenic, cadmium and lead. These pollutants contribute to acid rain as well as health problems such as heart and respiratory diseases and cancer. Coal mining and oil and gas drilling can also damage environmentally and/or culturally significant ecosystems. Nuclear power creates highly toxic and long-lasting radioactive waste. Large-scale hydropower projects flood habitats and disrupt fish migration and can involve the relocation of entire communities.<br><br>Implementing conservation measures and switching to renewable sources of energy can help institutions save money and protect them from utility rate volatility. Renewable energy may be generated locally and allow campuses to support local economic development. Furthermore, institutions can help shape markets by creating demand for cleaner, renewable sources of energy.",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the percentage of electricity used by the institution that is generated from geothermal:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research<br></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. <br></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Operational Characteristics</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the percentage of electricity used by the institution that is generated from geothermal</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>energy source </em>and<em> geothermal.</em><br></p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value<br></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information</p><p></p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:<br></strong></p><p><strong>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission. Institutions may choose the annual start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month period.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>Report all on-site, stationary energy that was consumed by the institution (as the institution is defined in the overall STARS institutional boundary). Transportation fuels are excluded. Reporting on a sample or subset of energy generation and consumption is not allowed for this credit.<br><br>All reported energy figures should be based on site energy (the amount of energy consumed on campus) rather than source energy (the amount of energy consumed on campus plus the energy used off-site to generate and transport the energy to the institution).<br><br>Institutions that convert fuel on-site (e.g., on-campus cogeneration facilities and boilers) should report only the amount of fuel purchased/converted toward the total energy consumption figure, not the resulting heat, steam, hot/chilled water or electricity.<br><br>To aggregate energy consumption data from multiple sources, figures should be converted into MMBtu (one million British thermal units—a standard measure of energy) using the following equivalents:<br><br>---- insert conversion table ----<br><br>A unit conversion tool that includes more detailed conversion factors (e.g., for liquid fuels) is available in the online STARS Reporting Tool (.xls).</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+STARS_Total_Percentage_of_Renewable_Energy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Electricity_from_Geothermal+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642142,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Electricity from Hydro (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Electricity_from_Hydro.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Electricity from Hydro (%)",
      "question": "What percentage (%) electricity used by the institution is generated from hydro?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "For most institutions, energy consumption is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, which cause global climate change. Global climate change is having myriad negative impacts throughout the world, including increased frequency and potency of extreme weather events, sea level rise, species extinction, water shortages, declining agricultural production, ocean acidification, and spread of diseases. The impacts are particularly pronounced for vulnerable and poor communities and countries. In addition to causing global climate change, energy generation from fossil fuels, especially coal, produces air pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury, dioxins, arsenic, cadmium and lead. These pollutants contribute to acid rain as well as health problems such as heart and respiratory diseases and cancer. Coal mining and oil and gas drilling can also damage environmentally and/or culturally significant ecosystems. Nuclear power creates highly toxic and long-lasting radioactive waste. Large-scale hydropower projects flood habitats and disrupt fish migration and can involve the relocation of entire communities.<br><br>Implementing conservation measures and switching to renewable sources of energy can help institutions save money and protect them from utility rate volatility. Renewable energy may be generated locally and allow campuses to support local economic development. Furthermore, institutions can help shape markets by creating demand for cleaner, renewable sources of energy.",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the percentage of electricity used by the institution that is generated from hydro:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research<br></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. <br></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Operational Characteristics</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the percentage of electricity used by the institution that is generated from hydro</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>energy source </em>and<em> hydro.</em><br></p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value<br></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information</p><p></p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:<br><br>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission. Institutions may choose the annual start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month period.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>Report all on-site, stationary energy that was consumed by the institution (as the institution is defined in the overall STARS institutional boundary). Transportation fuels are excluded. Reporting on a sample or subset of energy generation and consumption is not allowed for this credit.<br><br>All reported energy figures should be based on site energy (the amount of energy consumed on campus) rather than source energy (the amount of energy consumed on campus plus the energy used off-site to generate and transport the energy to the institution).<br><br>Institutions that convert fuel on-site (e.g., on-campus cogeneration facilities and boilers) should report only the amount of fuel purchased/converted toward the total energy consumption figure, not the resulting heat, steam, hot/chilled water or electricity.<br><br>To aggregate energy consumption data from multiple sources, figures should be converted into MMBtu (one million British thermal units—a standard measure of energy) using the following equivalents:<br><br>---- insert conversion table ----<br><br>A unit conversion tool that includes more detailed conversion factors (e.g., for liquid fuels) is available in the online STARS Reporting Tool (.xls).</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+STARS_Total_Percentage_of_Renewable_Energy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Electricity_from_Hydro+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642153,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Electricity from Natural Gas (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Electricity_from_Natural_Gas.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Electricity from Natural Gas (%)",
      "question": "What percentage (%) electricity used by the institution is generated from natural gas?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "For most institutions, energy consumption is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, which cause global climate change. Global climate change is having myriad negative impacts throughout the world, including increased frequency and potency of extreme weather events, sea level rise, species extinction, water shortages, declining agricultural production, ocean acidification, and spread of diseases. The impacts are particularly pronounced for vulnerable and poor communities and countries. In addition to causing global climate change, energy generation from fossil fuels, especially coal, produces air pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury, dioxins, arsenic, cadmium and lead. These pollutants contribute to acid rain as well as health problems such as heart and respiratory diseases and cancer. Coal mining and oil and gas drilling can also damage environmentally and/or culturally significant ecosystems. Nuclear power creates highly toxic and long-lasting radioactive waste. Large-scale hydropower projects flood habitats and disrupt fish migration and can involve the relocation of entire communities.<br><br>Implementing conservation measures and switching to renewable sources of energy can help institutions save money and protect them from utility rate volatility. Renewable energy may be generated locally and allow campuses to support local economic development. Furthermore, institutions can help shape markets by creating demand for cleaner, renewable sources of energy.",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the percentage of electricity used by the institution that is generated from natural gas:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research<br></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. <br></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Operational Characteristics</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the percentage of electricity used by the institution that is generated from natural gas</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>energy source </em>and<em> natural gas.</em><br></p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value<br></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information</p><p></p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission. Institutions may choose the annual start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month period.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>Report all on-site, stationary energy that was consumed by the institution (as the institution is defined in the overall STARS institutional boundary). Transportation fuels are excluded. Reporting on a sample or subset of energy generation and consumption is not allowed for this credit.<br><br>All reported energy figures should be based on site energy (the amount of energy consumed on campus) rather than source energy (the amount of energy consumed on campus plus the energy used off-site to generate and transport the energy to the institution).<br><br>Institutions that convert fuel on-site (e.g., on-campus cogeneration facilities and boilers) should report only the amount of fuel purchased/converted toward the total energy consumption figure, not the resulting heat, steam, hot/chilled water or electricity.<br><br>To aggregate energy consumption data from multiple sources, figures should be converted into MMBtu (one million British thermal units—a standard measure of energy) using the following equivalents:<br><br>---- insert conversion table ----<br><br>A unit conversion tool that includes more detailed conversion factors (e.g., for liquid fuels) is available in the online STARS Reporting Tool (.xls).</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Electricity_from_Natural_Gas+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642164,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Electricity from Nuclear (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Electricity_from_Nuclear.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Electricity from Nuclear (%)",
      "question": "What percentage (%) electricity used by the institution is generated from nuclear?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "For most institutions, energy consumption is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, which cause global climate change. Global climate change is having myriad negative impacts throughout the world, including increased frequency and potency of extreme weather events, sea level rise, species extinction, water shortages, declining agricultural production, ocean acidification, and spread of diseases. The impacts are particularly pronounced for vulnerable and poor communities and countries. In addition to causing global climate change, energy generation from fossil fuels, especially coal, produces air pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury, dioxins, arsenic, cadmium and lead. These pollutants contribute to acid rain as well as health problems such as heart and respiratory diseases and cancer. Coal mining and oil and gas drilling can also damage environmentally and/or culturally significant ecosystems. Nuclear power creates highly toxic and long-lasting radioactive waste. Large-scale hydropower projects flood habitats and disrupt fish migration and can involve the relocation of entire communities.",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the percentage of electricity used by the institution that is generated from nuclear:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research<br></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. <br></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Operational Characteristics</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the percentage of electricity used by the institution that is generated from nuclear</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>energy source </em>and<em> nuclear.</em><br></p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value<br></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information</p><p></p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:<br><br>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission. Institutions may choose the annual start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month period.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>Report all on-site, stationary energy that was consumed by the institution (as the institution is defined in the overall STARS institutional boundary). Transportation fuels are excluded. Reporting on a sample or subset of energy generation and consumption is not allowed for this credit.<br><br>All reported energy figures should be based on site energy (the amount of energy consumed on campus) rather than source energy (the amount of energy consumed on campus plus the energy used off-site to generate and transport the energy to the institution).<br><br>Institutions that convert fuel on-site (e.g., on-campus cogeneration facilities and boilers) should report only the amount of fuel purchased/converted toward the total energy consumption figure, not the resulting heat, steam, hot/chilled water or electricity.<br><br>To aggregate energy consumption data from multiple sources, figures should be converted into MMBtu (one million British thermal units—a standard measure of energy) using the following equivalents:<br><br><br><br>A unit conversion tool that includes more detailed conversion factors (e.g., for liquid fuels) is available in the online STARS Reporting Tool (.xls).</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Electricity_from_Nuclear+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642175,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Electricity from Solar Photovoltaic (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Electricity_from_Solar_Photovoltaic.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Electricity from Solar Photovoltaic (%)",
      "question": "What percentage (%) electricity used by the institution is generated from solar photovoltaic?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "For most institutions, energy consumption is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, which cause global climate change. Global climate change is having myriad negative impacts throughout the world, including increased frequency and potency of extreme weather events, sea level rise, species extinction, water shortages, declining agricultural production, ocean acidification, and spread of diseases. The impacts are particularly pronounced for vulnerable and poor communities and countries. In addition to causing global climate change, energy generation from fossil fuels, especially coal, produces air pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury, dioxins, arsenic, cadmium and lead. These pollutants contribute to acid rain as well as health problems such as heart and respiratory diseases and cancer. Coal mining and oil and gas drilling can also damage environmentally and/or culturally significant ecosystems. Nuclear power creates highly toxic and long-lasting radioactive waste. Large-scale hydropower projects flood habitats and disrupt fish migration and can involve the relocation of entire communities.<br><br>Implementing conservation measures and switching to renewable sources of energy can help institutions save money and protect them from utility rate volatility. Renewable energy may be generated locally and allow campuses to support local economic development. Furthermore, institutions can help shape markets by creating demand for cleaner, renewable sources of energy.",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the percentage of electricity used by the institution that is generated from solar photovoltaic:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research<br></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. <br></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Operational Characteristics</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the percentage of electricity used by the institution that is generated from solar photovoltaic</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>energy source </em>and<em> solar photovoltaic.</em><br></p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value<br></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information</p><p></p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p><strong><br>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission. Institutions may choose the annual start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month period.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>Report all on-site, stationary energy that was consumed by the institution (as the institution is defined in the overall STARS institutional boundary). Transportation fuels are excluded. Reporting on a sample or subset of energy generation and consumption is not allowed for this credit.<br><br>All reported energy figures should be based on site energy (the amount of energy consumed on campus) rather than source energy (the amount of energy consumed on campus plus the energy used off-site to generate and transport the energy to the institution).<br><br>Institutions that convert fuel on-site (e.g., on-campus cogeneration facilities and boilers) should report only the amount of fuel purchased/converted toward the total energy consumption figure, not the resulting heat, steam, hot/chilled water or electricity.<br><br>To aggregate energy consumption data from multiple sources, figures should be converted into MMBtu (one million British thermal units—a standard measure of energy) using the following equivalents:<br><br>---- insert conversion table ----<br><br>A unit conversion tool that includes more detailed conversion factors (e.g., for liquid fuels) is available in the online STARS Reporting Tool (.xls).</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+STARS_Total_Percentage_of_Renewable_Energy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Electricity_from_Solar_Photovoltaic+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642186,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Electricity from Wind (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Electricity_from_Wind.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Electricity from Wind (%)",
      "question": "What percentage (%) electricity used by the institution is generated from wind?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "For most institutions, energy consumption is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, which cause global climate change. Global climate change is having myriad negative impacts throughout the world, including increased frequency and potency of extreme weather events, sea level rise, species extinction, water shortages, declining agricultural production, ocean acidification, and spread of diseases. The impacts are particularly pronounced for vulnerable and poor communities and countries. In addition to causing global climate change, energy generation from fossil fuels, especially coal, produces air pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury, dioxins, arsenic, cadmium and lead. These pollutants contribute to acid rain as well as health problems such as heart and respiratory diseases and cancer. Coal mining and oil and gas drilling can also damage environmentally and/or culturally significant ecosystems. Nuclear power creates highly toxic and long-lasting radioactive waste. Large-scale hydropower projects flood habitats and disrupt fish migration and can involve the relocation of entire communities.<br><br>Implementing conservation measures and switching to renewable sources of energy can help institutions save money and protect them from utility rate volatility. Renewable energy may be generated locally and allow campuses to support local economic development. Furthermore, institutions can help shape markets by creating demand for cleaner, renewable sources of energy.",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the percentage of electricity used by the institution that is generated from wind:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research<br></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. <br></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Operational Characteristics</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the percentage of electricity used by the institution that is generated from wind</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>energy source </em>and<em> wind.</em><br></p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value<br></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information</p><p></p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:<br></strong></p><p><strong>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission. Institutions may choose the annual start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month period.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>Report all on-site, stationary energy that was consumed by the institution (as the institution is defined in the overall STARS institutional boundary). Transportation fuels are excluded. Reporting on a sample or subset of energy generation and consumption is not allowed for this credit.<br><br>All reported energy figures should be based on site energy (the amount of energy consumed on campus) rather than source energy (the amount of energy consumed on campus plus the energy used off-site to generate and transport the energy to the institution).<br><br>Institutions that convert fuel on-site (e.g., on-campus cogeneration facilities and boilers) should report only the amount of fuel purchased/converted toward the total energy consumption figure, not the resulting heat, steam, hot/chilled water or electricity.<br><br>To aggregate energy consumption data from multiple sources, figures should be converted into MMBtu (one million British thermal units—a standard measure of energy) using the following equivalents:<br><br>---- insert conversion table ----<br><br>A unit conversion tool that includes more detailed conversion factors (e.g., for liquid fuels) is available in the online STARS Reporting Tool (.xls).</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+STARS_Total_Percentage_of_Renewable_Energy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Electricity_from_Wind+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642197,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Electricity from Other Sources (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Electricity_from_Other_Sources.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Electricity from Other Sources (%)",
      "question": "What percentage (%) electricity used by the institution is generated from other sources?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Since this credit is intended to recognize institutions that are actively supporting the development and use of clean and renewable energy, neither the electric grid mix for the region in which the institution is located nor the grid mix reported by the electric utility that serves the institution (i.e., the utility’s standard or default product) count for this credit.<br><br>The following <em>renewable systems</em> are eligible for this credit:</p><ul><li><p>Concentrated solar thermal</p></li><li><p>Geothermal systems that generate electricity</p></li><li><p>Low-impact hydroelectric power</p></li><li><p>Solar photovoltaic</p></li><li><p>Wave and tidal power</p></li><li><p>Wind<br></p></li></ul><p><br><em>Biofuels</em> from the following sources are eligible:</p><ul><li><p>Agricultural crops</p></li><li><p>Agricultural waste</p></li><li><p>Animal waste</p></li><li><p>Landfill gas</p></li><li><p>Untreated wood waste</p></li><li><p>Other organic waste<br><br></p></li></ul><p>Technologies that reduce the amount of energy used but do not generate renewable energy do not count for this credit (e.g., daylighting, passive solar design, ground-source heat pumps). The benefits of such strategies, as well as the improved efficiencies achieved through using cogeneration technologies, are captured by the Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Building Energy Consumption credits.<br><br>Transportation fuels, which are covered by the Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Campus Fleet credits, are not included.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the percentage of electricity used by the institution that is generated from other sources:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research<br></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. <br></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Operational Characteristics</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the percentage of electricity used by the institution that is generated from other sources</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>energy source </em>and<em> other sources.</em><br></p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value<br></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>A description of the other sources of electricity</strong></p></li></ul><p></p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p></p><p><br><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:<br><br>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission. Institutions may choose the annual start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month period.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>Report all on-site, stationary energy that was consumed by the institution (as the institution is defined in the overall STARS institutional boundary). Transportation fuels are excluded. Reporting on a sample or subset of energy generation and consumption is not allowed for this credit.<br><br>All reported energy figures should be based on site energy (the amount of energy consumed on campus) rather than source energy (the amount of energy consumed on campus plus the energy used off-site to generate and transport the energy to the institution).<br><br>Institutions that convert fuel on-site (e.g., on-campus cogeneration facilities and boilers) should report only the amount of fuel purchased/converted toward the total energy consumption figure, not the resulting heat, steam, hot/chilled water or electricity.<br><br>To aggregate energy consumption data from multiple sources, figures should be converted into MMBtu (one million British thermal units—a standard measure of energy) using the following equivalents:<br><br><br>—insert conversion table ——<br><br><br>A unit conversion tool that includes more detailed conversion factors (e.g., for liquid fuels) is available in the online STARS Reporting Tool (.xls).\"<br></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Electricity_from_Other_Sources+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642208,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Number of Degree-seeking Students",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Number_of_Degree_seeking_Students.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Number of Degree-seeking Students",
      "question": "What is the total number of degree-seeking students registered with the institution?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Operational characteristics, like the number of degree-seeking students, are variables that provide information about the context in which the institution operates. Institutions should report the most recent data available within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission.</p><p><strong>Definition: Degree-seeking students / students enrolled for credit</strong><br>Consistent with U.S. IPEDS, students enrolled for credit include all students enrolled in courses or programs that can be applied towards the requirements for a postsecondary degree, diploma, certificate, or other formal award, regardless of whether or not they are seeking a degree or certificate. This includes:</p><ul><li><p>Students enrolled for credit in off-campus centers</p></li><li><p>High school students taking regular college courses for credit</p></li><li><p>Students taking remedial courses if the student is degree-seeking for the purpose of student financial aid determination</p></li><li><p>Students from overseas enrolled in U.S. courses for credit (e.g., online students)</p></li><li><p>Graduate students enrolled for thesis credits, even when zero credits are awarded as these students are still enrolled and seeking their degree</p></li></ul>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the total number of degree-seeking students registered with the institution:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. </p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value. &nbsp;&nbsp;</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Academics &amp; Demographics</strong>. </p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the total number of degree-seeking students registered at the institution</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>degree, credit, </em>and<em> student.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information</p></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br></p><p><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>Include all students enrolled for credit (undergraduate and graduate); reporting on a sample or subset of students is not allowed.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Students",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+STARS_Total_Amount_of_Energy_kWh_Consumed_per_Student.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Number_of_Degree_seeking_Students+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642219,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Institution-catalyzed carbon offsets generated, performance year",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Institution_catalyzed_carbon_offsets_generated_performance_year.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Institution-catalyzed carbon offsets generated, performance year",
      "question": "How many metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent did the institution manage to reduce through their institution-catalyzed carbon offsets (i.e. local offsets) program during the performance year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Institution-catalyzed carbon offsets</strong> are generated by what are commonly referred to as “local offsets” programs. In such programs, institutions offset their greenhouse gas emissions by implementing projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the local community. </p><p>For example, a local offsets program may engage students in weatherizing homes in the surrounding community. As part of the arrangement with the homeowner, the institution would “own” the emissions reductions that result from the program. Local projects that are to be used as offsets must be third party verified or, at minimum, quantified using a method that is consistent with the World Resources Institute’s [[http://www.ghgprotocol.org/standards/project-protocol|GHG Protocol for Project Accounting]].</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for how many metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent the institution managed to reduce through their institution-catalyzed carbon offsets (i.e. local offsets) program during the performance year:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research<br></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. </p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value. &nbsp;&nbsp;</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Operations </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Air &amp; Climate</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Greenhouse Gas Emissions</strong>. </p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>how many metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent the institution managed to reduce through their institution-catalyzed carbon offsets (i.e. local offsets) program during the performance year</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>institution-catalyzed, local offsets program, </em>and<em> carbon offsets program.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>the start and end date of the performance year</strong></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br></p><p></p><p><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Timeframe</strong><br><em>Performance Year</em><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission. Institutions may use the most recent single year for which data is available or an average from throughout the period. Institutions may choose the annual start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month (or 3-year) period.<br><br>Institutions may choose the start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month (or 3-year) period.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>Institution-catalyzed offsets that are to be counted as offsets must be third party verified or, at minimum, quantified using a method that addresses all of the following accounting issues:<br></p><p>Selection of a baseline scenario (i.e, what would have happened in the absence of the project?);</p><ul><li><p>Demonstration of additionality (i.e., the project has resulted in emission reductions or removals in addition to what would have happened in the absence of the project);</p></li><li><p>Identification and quantification of relevant secondary effects (i.e., small, unintended GHG consequences of a project, include leakage and changes in GHG emissions up- and downstream of the project);</p></li><li><p>Consideration of reversibility (i.e., assessing the risk of reversibility, together with any mitigation or compensation measures included in the project design);</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Avoidance of double-counting (i.e., the reductions giving rise to the offset must occur at sources or sinks not included in the target or cap for which the offset is used).<br><br></p></li></ul><p>To account for Institution-catalyzed offsets institutions may pursue third party verification or else use a credible methodology that addresses all of the accounting issues outlined in B. Criteria. <br>Examples include:</p><ul><li><p>[[|GHG Protocol for Project Accounting]] (World Resources Institute)</p></li><li><p>[[|Land Use, Land Change and Forestry]] (IPCC)</p></li><li><p>[[|Forest Project Protocol]] (Climate Action Reserve),</p></li><li><p>Framework for Forest Management Offset Protocols (Canadian Council of Forest Ministers)</p></li><li><p>The [[|Compliance Offset Protocols]] (COP) adopted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).<br></p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "MtCO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Institution_catalyzed_carbon_offsets_generated_performance_year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642230,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Scope 3 from Business Travel (performance year)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Scope_3_from_Business_Travel_performance_year.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Scope 3 from Business Travel (performance year)",
      "question": "What is the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from business travel that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Scope 3 GHG emissions</strong> are all indirect emissions not covered in Scope 2. Consistent with the [[http://www.ghgprotocol.org/standards/scope-3-standard|WRI Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard]], Scope 3 GHG emissions sources include:<br><br><em><strong>Upstream</strong> Scope 3 emissions</em></p><ul><li><p>Purchased goods and services</p></li><li><p>Capital goods</p></li><li><p>Fuel- and energy-related activities (not included in scope 1 or scope 2)</p></li><li><p>Upstream transportation and distribution</p></li><li><p>Waste generated in operations</p></li><li><p>Business travel</p></li><li><p>Commuting (employee and student)</p></li><li><p>Upstream leased assets</p></li></ul><p></p><p><br><em><strong>Downstream</strong> Scope 3 emissions</em></p><ul><li><p>Downstream transportation and distribution</p></li><li><p>Processing of sold products</p></li><li><p>Use of sold products</p></li><li><p>End-of-life treatment of sold products</p></li><li><p>Downstream leased assets</p></li><li><p>Franchises</p></li><li><p>Investments</p></li></ul>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>This metric is looking for the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from business travel that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p><p></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. <br></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Operations </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Air &amp; Climate</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Greenhouse Gas Emissions</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from </strong><em><strong>business travel</strong></em><strong> that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>Scope 3 </em>and<em> business travel.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>the start and end date of the performance year</strong></p><p></p></li></ul></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Timeframe</strong><br><em>Performance Year</em><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission. Institutions may use the most recent single year for which data is available or an average from throughout the period. Institutions may choose the annual start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month (or 3-year) period.<br><br>Institutions may choose the start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month (or 3-year) period.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>To conduct a GHG emissions inventory, campuses may use the [[|Campus Carbon Calculator/CarbonMAP]], the [[|Scope 3 Evaluator]] tool, and/or any methodology or calculator that is consistent with the World Resources Institute (WRI) Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard and the [[|Scope 3 calculation guidance]] provided by WRI.<br></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "MtCO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Scope_3_from_Business_Travel_performance_year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642241,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Scope 3 from Commuting (performance year)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Scope_3_from_Commuting_performance_year.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Scope 3 from Commuting (performance year)",
      "question": "What is the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from commuting that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Scope 3 GHG emissions</strong> are all indirect emissions not covered in Scope 2. Consistent with the [[http://www.ghgprotocol.org/standards/scope-3-standard|WRI Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard]], Scope 3 GHG emissions sources include:<br><br><em><strong>Upstream</strong> Scope 3 emissions</em></p><ul><li><p>Purchased goods and services</p></li><li><p>Capital goods</p></li><li><p>Fuel- and energy-related activities (not included in scope 1 or scope 2)</p></li><li><p>Upstream transportation and distribution</p></li><li><p>Waste generated in operations</p></li><li><p>Business travel</p></li><li><p>Commuting (employee and student)</p></li><li><p>Upstream leased assets</p></li></ul><p></p><p><br><em><strong>Downstream</strong> Scope 3 emissions</em></p><ul><li><p>Downstream transportation and distribution</p></li><li><p>Processing of sold products</p></li><li><p>Use of sold products</p></li><li><p>End-of-life treatment of sold products</p></li><li><p>Downstream leased assets</p></li><li><p>Franchises</p></li><li><p>Investments</p></li></ul>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from commuting that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p><p></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. <br></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Operations </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Air &amp; Climate</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Greenhouse Gas Emissions</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from </strong><em><strong>commuting</strong></em><strong> that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>Scope 3 </em>and<em> commuting.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>the start and end date of the performance year</strong></p><p></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Timeframe</strong><br><em>Performance Year</em><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission. Institutions may use the most recent single year for which data is available or an average from throughout the period. Institutions may choose the annual start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month (or 3-year) period.<br><br>Institutions may choose the start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month (or 3-year) period.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>To conduct a GHG emissions inventory, campuses may use the [[|Campus Carbon Calculator/CarbonMAP]], the [[|Scope 3 Evaluator]] tool, and/or any methodology or calculator that is consistent with the World Resources Institute (WRI) Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard and the [[|Scope 3 calculation guidance]] provided by WRI.<br></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "MtCO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Scope_3_from_Commuting_performance_year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642252,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Scope 3 from Purchased Goods and Services (performance year)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Scope_3_from_Purchased_Goods_and_Services_performance_year.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Scope 3 from Purchased Goods and Services (performance year)",
      "question": "What is the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from purchased goods and services that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Scope 3 GHG emissions</strong> are all indirect emissions not covered in Scope 2. Consistent with the [[http://www.ghgprotocol.org/standards/scope-3-standard|WRI Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard]], Scope 3 GHG emissions sources include:<br><br><em><strong>Upstream</strong> Scope 3 emissions</em></p><ul><li><p>Purchased goods and services</p></li><li><p>Capital goods</p></li><li><p>Fuel- and energy-related activities (not included in scope 1 or scope 2)</p></li><li><p>Upstream transportation and distribution</p></li><li><p>Waste generated in operations</p></li><li><p>Business travel</p></li><li><p>Commuting (employee and student)</p></li><li><p>Upstream leased assets</p></li></ul><p></p><p><br><em><strong>Downstream</strong> Scope 3 emissions</em></p><ul><li><p>Downstream transportation and distribution</p></li><li><p>Processing of sold products</p></li><li><p>Use of sold products</p></li><li><p>End-of-life treatment of sold products</p></li><li><p>Downstream leased assets</p></li><li><p>Franchises</p></li><li><p>Investments</p></li></ul>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>This metric is looking for the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from purchased goods and services that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p><p></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. <br></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Operations </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Air &amp; Climate</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Greenhouse Gas Emissions</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from </strong><em><strong>purchased goods and services</strong></em><strong> that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>Scope 3 </em>and<em> purchased goods and services.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>the start and end date of the performance year</strong></p><p></p></li></ul></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p><strong><br>Timeframe</strong><br><em>Performance Year</em><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission. Institutions may use the most recent single year for which data is available or an average from throughout the period. Institutions may choose the annual start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month (or 3-year) period.<br><br>Institutions may choose the start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month (or 3-year) period.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>To conduct a GHG emissions inventory, campuses may use the [[|Campus Carbon Calculator/CarbonMAP]], the [[|Scope 3 Evaluator]] tool, and/or any methodology or calculator that is consistent with the World Resources Institute (WRI) Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard and the [[|Scope 3 calculation guidance]] provided by WRI.<br></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "MtCO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Scope_3_from_Purchased_Goods_and_Services_performance_year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642263,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Scope 3 from Capital Goods (performance year)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Scope_3_from_Capital_Goods_performance_year.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Scope 3 from Capital Goods (performance year)",
      "question": "What is the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from capital goods that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Scope 3 GHG emissions</strong> are all indirect emissions not covered in Scope 2. Consistent with the [[http://www.ghgprotocol.org/standards/scope-3-standard|WRI Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard]], Scope 3 GHG emissions sources include:<br><br><em><strong>Upstream</strong> Scope 3 emissions</em></p><ul><li><p>Purchased goods and services</p></li><li><p>Capital goods</p></li><li><p>Fuel- and energy-related activities (not included in scope 1 or scope 2)</p></li><li><p>Upstream transportation and distribution</p></li><li><p>Waste generated in operations</p></li><li><p>Business travel</p></li><li><p>Commuting (employee and student)</p></li><li><p>Upstream leased assets</p></li></ul><p></p><p><br><em><strong>Downstream</strong> Scope 3 emissions</em></p><ul><li><p>Downstream transportation and distribution</p></li><li><p>Processing of sold products</p></li><li><p>Use of sold products</p></li><li><p>End-of-life treatment of sold products</p></li><li><p>Downstream leased assets</p></li><li><p>Franchises</p></li><li><p>Investments</p></li></ul>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from capital goods that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p><p></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. <br></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Operations </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Air &amp; Climate</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Greenhouse Gas Emissions</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from </strong><em><strong>capital goods</strong></em><strong> that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>Scope 3 </em>and<em> capital goods.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>the start and end date of the performance year</strong></p><p></p></li></ul></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p></p><p><br><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Timeframe</strong><br><em>Performance Year</em><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission. Institutions may use the most recent single year for which data is available or an average from throughout the period. Institutions may choose the annual start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month (or 3-year) period.<br><br>Institutions may choose the start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month (or 3-year) period.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>To conduct a GHG emissions inventory, campuses may use the [[|Campus Carbon Calculator/CarbonMAP]], the [[|Scope 3 Evaluator]] tool, and/or any methodology or calculator that is consistent with the World Resources Institute (WRI) Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard and the [[|Scope 3 calculation guidance]] provided by WRI.<br></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "MtCO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Scope_3_from_Capital_Goods_performance_year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642274,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Scope 3 from Fuel- and Energy-related Activities Not Included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 (performance year)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Scope_3_from_Fuel_and_Energy_related_Activities_Not_Included_in_Scope_1_or_Scope_2_performance_year.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Scope 3 from Fuel- and Energy-related Activities Not Included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 (performance year)",
      "question": "What is the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from fuel- and energy-related activities (not included in scope 1 or scope 2) that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Scope 3 GHG emissions</strong> are all indirect emissions not covered in Scope 2. Consistent with the [[http://www.ghgprotocol.org/standards/scope-3-standard|WRI Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard]], Scope 3 GHG emissions sources include:<br><br><em><strong>Upstream</strong> Scope 3 emissions</em></p><ul><li><p>Purchased goods and services</p></li><li><p>Capital goods</p></li><li><p>Fuel- and energy-related activities (not included in scope 1 or scope 2)</p></li><li><p>Upstream transportation and distribution</p></li><li><p>Waste generated in operations</p></li><li><p>Business travel</p></li><li><p>Commuting (employee and student)</p></li><li><p>Upstream leased assets</p></li></ul><p></p><p><br><em><strong>Downstream</strong> Scope 3 emissions</em></p><ul><li><p>Downstream transportation and distribution</p></li><li><p>Processing of sold products</p></li><li><p>Use of sold products</p></li><li><p>End-of-life treatment of sold products</p></li><li><p>Downstream leased assets</p></li><li><p>Franchises</p></li><li><p>Investments</p></li></ul>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>This metric is looking for the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from fuel and energy related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2) that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p><p></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. <br></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Operations </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Air &amp; Climate</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Greenhouse Gas Emissions</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from </strong><em><strong>fuel and energy related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2)</strong></em><strong> that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>Scope 3, fuel </em>and<em> energy.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>the start and end date of the performance year</strong></p><p></p></li></ul></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p></p><p><br><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:<br><br>Timeframe</strong><br><em>Performance Year</em><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission. Institutions may use the most recent single year for which data is available or an average from throughout the period. Institutions may choose the annual start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month (or 3-year) period.<br><br>Institutions may choose the start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month (or 3-year) period.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>To conduct a GHG emissions inventory, campuses may use the [[|Campus Carbon Calculator/CarbonMAP]], the [[|Scope 3 Evaluator]] tool, and/or any methodology or calculator that is consistent with the World Resources Institute (WRI) Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard and the [[|Scope 3 calculation guidance]] provided by WRI.<br></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "MtCO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Scope_3_from_Fuel_and_Energy_related_Activities_Not_Included_in_Scope_1_or_Scope_2_performance_year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642285,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Scope 3 from Waste Generated in Operations (performance year)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Scope_3_from_Waste_Generated_in_Operations_performance_year.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Scope 3 from Waste Generated in Operations (performance year)",
      "question": "What is the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) resulting from waste generated in operations that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Scope 3 GHG emissions</strong> are all indirect emissions not covered in Scope 2. Consistent with the [[http://www.ghgprotocol.org/standards/scope-3-standard|WRI Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard]], Scope 3 GHG emissions sources include:<br><br><em><strong>Upstream</strong> Scope 3 emissions</em></p><ul><li><p>Purchased goods and services</p></li><li><p>Capital goods</p></li><li><p>Fuel- and energy-related activities (not included in scope 1 or scope 2)</p></li><li><p>Upstream transportation and distribution</p></li><li><p>Waste generated in operations</p></li><li><p>Business travel</p></li><li><p>Commuting (employee and student)</p></li><li><p>Upstream leased assets</p></li></ul><p></p><p><br><em><strong>Downstream</strong> Scope 3 emissions</em></p><ul><li><p>Downstream transportation and distribution</p></li><li><p>Processing of sold products</p></li><li><p>Use of sold products</p></li><li><p>End-of-life treatment of sold products</p></li><li><p>Downstream leased assets</p></li><li><p>Franchises</p></li><li><p>Investments</p></li></ul>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from waste generated in operations that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p><p></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. <br></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Operations </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Air &amp; Climate</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Greenhouse Gas Emissions</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from </strong><em><strong>waste generated in operations</strong></em><strong> that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>Scope 3 </em>and<em> waste.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>the start and end date of the performance year</strong></p><p></p></li></ul></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p></p><p><br><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Timeframe</strong><br><em>Performance Year</em><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission. Institutions may use the most recent single year for which data is available or an average from throughout the period. Institutions may choose the annual start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month (or 3-year) period.<br><br>Institutions may choose the start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month (or 3-year) period.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>To conduct a GHG emissions inventory, campuses may use the [[|Campus Carbon Calculator/CarbonMAP]], the [[|Scope 3 Evaluator]] tool, and/or any methodology or calculator that is consistent with the World Resources Institute (WRI) Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard and the [[|Scope 3 calculation guidance]] provided by WRI.<br></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "MtCO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Scope_3_from_Waste_Generated_in_Operations_performance_year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642296,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Scope 3 from Other Categories (performance year)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Scope_3_from_Other_Categories_performance_year.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Scope 3 from Other Categories (performance year)",
      "question": "What is the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from other categories that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Scope 3 GHG emissions</strong> are all indirect emissions not covered in Scope 2. Consistent with the [[http://www.ghgprotocol.org/standards/scope-3-standard|WRI Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard]], Scope 3 GHG emissions sources include:<br><br><em><strong>Upstream</strong> Scope 3 emissions</em></p><ul><li><p>Purchased goods and services</p></li><li><p>Capital goods</p></li><li><p>Fuel- and energy-related activities (not included in scope 1 or scope 2)</p></li><li><p>Upstream transportation and distribution</p></li><li><p>Waste generated in operations</p></li><li><p>Business travel</p></li><li><p>Commuting (employee and student)</p></li><li><p>Upstream leased assets</p></li></ul><p></p><p><br><em><strong>Downstream</strong> Scope 3 emissions</em></p><ul><li><p>Downstream transportation and distribution</p></li><li><p>Processing of sold products</p></li><li><p>Use of sold products</p></li><li><p>End-of-life treatment of sold products</p></li><li><p>Downstream leased assets</p></li><li><p>Franchises</p></li><li><p>Investments</p></li></ul>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from other categories that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p><p></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. <br></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Operations </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Air &amp; Climate</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Greenhouse Gas Emissions</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) generated from </strong><em><strong>other categories</strong></em><strong> that the institution is indirectly responsible for during the performance year</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>Scope 3 </em>and<em> other categories.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>the start and end date of the performance year</strong></p></li><li><p><strong>a brief description of the other categories</strong></p><p></p></li></ul></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p></p><p><br><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Timeframe</strong><br></p><p><em>Performance Year</em><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission. Institutions may use the most recent single year for which data is available or an average from throughout the period. Institutions may choose the annual start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month (or 3-year) period.<br><br>Institutions may choose the start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month (or 3-year) period.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>To conduct a GHG emissions inventory, campuses may use the [[|Campus Carbon Calculator/CarbonMAP]], the [[|Scope 3 Evaluator]] tool, and/or any methodology or calculator that is consistent with the World Resources Institute (WRI) Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard and the [[|Scope 3 calculation guidance]] provided by WRI.<br></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "MtCO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Scope_3_from_Other_Categories_performance_year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642307,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Dining Service Expenditures Allocated to Locally Sourced Food and Beverage (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Dining_Service_Expenditures_Allocated_to_Locally_Sourced_Food_and_Beverage.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Dining Service Expenditures Allocated to Locally Sourced Food and Beverage (%)",
      "question": "How much (%) of the institution's dining services expenditures on food and beverage is local and community-based and/or third party verified?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This credit recognizes institutions that are supporting sustainable food systems through their food and beverage purchases. Institutions can do this by prioritizing the purchase of environmentally and socially preferable food and beverage items. These actions reduce the social and environmental impacts of food production and help foster robust local economies and food security; improved conditions for farm workers; healthier animals, soils and waterways; and secure livelihoods for farmers.<br><br><em>1) Third Party Verified</em><br>The product is ecologically sound, fair and/or humane as determined by one or more recognized food and beverage sustainability standards (see G. Standards and Terms).<br>For example: Certified Organic, Fair Trade, and Humane products (irrespective of geographic origin). Manufactured products that carry a recognized third party label (irrespective of the percentage of ingredients that are certified).<br><br><em>2) Both Local and Community-Based</em> <br>The product does not meet the criteria outlined above, but is grown, raised or caught by a community-based producer within 250 miles (400 kilometres) of the institution. All production, processing and distribution occur within 250 miles.<br></p><p>This category provides a path for campus farms and gardens and small local producers to be recognized in the absence of third party certification. Products from intensive livestock operations (e.g., CAFO- permitted facilities), large producers ($5 million or more in annual sales), and geographically dispersed producers are excluded from this category. Distributors, bottlers and packers are not considered to be producers.<br></p><p>For example: Single ingredient products from on-campus gardens and farms and owner-operated farms and fisheries (and cooperatives of owner-operators) for which all facilities are within 250 miles. Multi-ingredient and multi-source products (e.g., baked goods, dairy products, jams, sauces) from local producers for which 50 percent or more of the ingredients (by weight, excluding water) are both local and community-based (or else third party verified). Local products sourced through a food value chain or food hub, farmers’ market, farm-to-institution program, or equivalent program that aims to support a sustainable local food system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for how much (%) of the institution's dining services expenditures on food and beverage is local and community-based and/or third party verified:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research<br></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. </p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value. &nbsp;&nbsp;</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Operations </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Dining Services</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Food and Beverage Purchasing</strong>. </p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>how much (%) of the institution's dining services expenditures on food and beverage is local and community-based and/or third party verified</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>local, community-based, </em>and<em> dining expenditures.</em></p><p></p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value<br></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>an inventory list or sample of sustainable food and beverage purchases</strong></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br></p><p><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from within the three years prior to the anticipated date of their STARS submission.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>Institutions may choose to track food and beverage purchases for a 12-month consecutive period or use a representative sample that includes data from at least two full months during a 12-month consecutive period (e.g., fiscal or academic year). When using samples, institutions must accommodate seasonal and other variations in sustainable food and beverage availability and purchasing. For example, an institution could select one month in the autumn when seasonal produce is still available (e.g., September or October) and one month in the winter or early spring that falls outside the normal growing season (e.g., February or March).<br><br>This credit is based on total food and beverage expenditures in the following categories:</p><ul><li><p>Dairy - fluid milk, cheese, yogurt, ice cream</p></li><li><p>Meat - beef, lamb, pork, game; including frozen or canned meat products</p></li><li><p>Poultry - chicken, turkey, other fowl</p></li><li><p>Eggs - shelled eggs, liquid egg product, powdered egg</p></li><li><p>Fish/Seafood - all fish or seafood products, including frozen or canned products</p></li><li><p>Produce - fresh, cut, or frozen fruits and vegetables</p></li><li><p>Grocery/Staple - grains; staples; vegetarian/vegan meat alternatives; most boxed, bottled, jarred, and canned products</p></li><li><p>Tea/Coffee - hot and cold coffee and tea products including bottled beverages, coffee beans, loose and bagged tea</p></li><li><p>Other Beverages (non-dairy) - soft drinks, sports drinks, milk alternatives</p></li><li><p>Baked Goods - baked products (pastries, breads, sweets)</p></li></ul><p>Institutions may not exclude any of the product types or categories outlined above from the total food and beverage expenditures figure.<br></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Dining_Service_Expenditures_Allocated_to_Locally_Sourced_Food_and_Beverage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642318,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Vegan Dining Option",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Vegan_Dining_Option.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Vegan Dining Option",
      "question": "Does the institution offer diverse, complete-protein vegan dining options at all meals in at least one dining facility on campus?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This credit recognizes institutions that are supporting sustainable food systems and minimizing the impacts of their dining service operations. An institution can operate its dining services sustainably through its procurement policies and decisions, by preventing food waste and diverting food materials from the waste stream, by making low impact dining options available, and by educating its customers about more sustainable options and practices.<br><br><strong>Definition: Complete-protein vegan options</strong><br>Recognizing that variety is a critical component of a nutritionally sound vegan diet, a “complete protein” vegan option must include, at minimum, two or more of the following food types: soy, whole grains, nuts and seeds, legumes.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking at whether the institution offers diverse, complete-protein vegan dining options at all meals in at least one dining facility on campus:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. <br></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Operations </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Dining Services</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Low Impact Dining</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>whether the institution offers diverse, complete-protein vegan dining options at all meals in at least one dining facility on campus</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>vegan, dining options, </em>and<em> responsible dining.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>a brief description of the vegan dining program, including availability, sample menus, signage and any promotional activities (e.g. “Meatless Mondays”)</strong></p></li><li><p><strong>a brief description of other efforts the institution has made to reduce the impact of its animal-derived food purchases</strong></p></li><li><p><strong>the website URL where information about the vegan dining program is available</strong></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Vegan_Dining_Option+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642329,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+EPEAT Registered Electronics Preference",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+EPEAT_Registered_Electronics_Preference.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "EPEAT Registered Electronics Preference",
      "question": "Does the institution have an institution-wide stated preference to purchase computers and/or other electronic products that are EPEAT registered or meet similar multi-criteria sustainability standards for electronic products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This credit recognizes institutions that are supporting markets for environmentally preferable computers and other electronic products. <br>[[http://www.epeat.net|<br>EPEAT]] is a certification for computers and other electronic products. The standard’s evaluation criteria include: energy efficiency, reduction and elimination of environmentally sensitive materials, materials selection, design for end-of-life, product longevity and life cycle extension, end-of-life management, corporate performance, and packaging characteristics. EPEAT currently registers products in 41 countries and regions.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking at whether the institution has an institution-wide stated preference to purchase computers and/or other electronic products that are EPEAT registered or meet similar multi-criteria sustainability standards for electronic products:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. </p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value. &nbsp;&nbsp;</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Operations </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Purchasing</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Electronics Purchasing</strong>. </p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong> whether the institution has an institution-wide stated preference to purchase computers and/or other electronic products that are EPEAT registered</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>EPEAT, electronics, </em>and<em> certification.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>the electronics purchasing policy, directive, or guidelines</strong></p></li><li><p><strong>a brief description of steps the institution has taken to ensure that the purchasing policy, directives, or guidelines are followed</strong></p></li><li><p><strong>the website URL where information about the institution's electronics purchasing policy, directive, or guidelines is available</strong></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p></p><p><br><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>Institutions may track purchases over a one-year time period or take a representative sample to determine the EPEAT level of electronic equipment purchases. When using a sample, institutions should strive to ensure that the sample recognizes seasonal and other variations that influence purchasing behavior.<br></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+EPEAT_Registered_Electronics_Preference+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642340,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Students Using Sustainable Commuting Options (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Students_Using_Sustainable_Commuting_Options.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Students Using Sustainable Commuting Options (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This credit recognizes institutions where students use preferable modes of transportation to travel to and from the institution. Commute modal split is a common measure used to evaluate the sustainability performance of a transportation system. Using alternative modes of transportation helps reduce local air pollution and GHG emissions. Walking and biking offer health benefits as well.<br><br>Institution's students commute to and from campus using more sustainable commuting options such as walking, bicycling, vanpooling or carpooling, taking public transportation, riding motorcycles or scooters, riding a campus shuttle, or a combination of these options.<br><br>Students who live on campus should be included in the calculation based on how they get to and from their classes.",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p><p></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time.</p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Operations </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Transportation</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Student Commute Modal Split</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>student commute, sustainable commuting, </em>and<em> sustainable transport.</em></p><p></p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value<br></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>a brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting</strong></p></li><li><p><strong>the website URL where information about sustainable transportation for students is available</strong></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br></p><p><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>Institutions may use a representative sample to gather data about student commuting behavior. For information about how to measure commuting behavior, see the guidance provided by the Massachusetts Rideshare Program and the South Coast Air Quality Management District.<br><br>This credit is scored based on the percentage of students (graduate and undergraduate) using alternatives to single-occupancy vehicle commuting (i.e., more sustainable commuting options). Students who do not regularly attend the physical campus (i.e., distance education students) may be excluded.<br></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Students_Using_Sustainable_Commuting_Options+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642351,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Employees Using Sustainable Commuting Options (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Employees_Using_Sustainable_Commuting_Options.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Employees Using Sustainable Commuting Options (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of the institution’s employees that use more sustainable commuting options?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This credit recognizes institutions where employees use preferable modes of transportation to travel to and from the institution. Commute modal split is a common measure used to evaluate the sustainability performance of a transportation system. Using alternative modes of transportation reduces local air pollution and GHG emissions. Walking and biking offer health benefits as well.<br><br>Institution's employees (faculty, staff, and administrators) get to and from campus using more sustainable commuting options such as walking, bicycling, vanpooling or carpooling, taking public transportation, riding motorcycles or scooters, riding a campus shuttle, telecommuting, or a combination of these options.<br><br>Employees who live on campus should be included in the calculation based on how they get to and from their workplace.",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p><p></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time.</p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Operations </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Transportation</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Employee Commute Modal Split</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>employee commute, sustainable commuting, </em>and<em> sustainable transport.</em></p><p></p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value<br></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>a brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting</strong></p></li><li><p><strong>the website URL where information about sustainable transportation for employees is available</strong></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br></p><p><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>Institutions may use a representative sample to gather data about employee commuting behavior. For information about how to measure commuting behavior, see the guidance provided by the [[|Massachusetts Rideshare Program]] and the [[|South Coast Air Quality Management District]].<br><br>This credit is scored based on the percentage of employees using alternatives to single-occupancy vehicle commuting (i.e., more sustainable commuting options).</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Employees_Using_Sustainable_Commuting_Options+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642362,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Institution-wide Electronic Waste Recycling Program",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Institution_wide_Electronic_Waste_Recycling_Program.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Institution-wide Electronic Waste Recycling Program",
      "question": "Does the institution have or participate in a program to responsibly recycle, reuse, and/or refurbish all electronic waste generated by the institution?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This credit recognizes institutions that seek to minimize and safely dispose of all hazardous, universal, and non- regulated chemical waste and that have electronic waste (“e-waste”) recycling and/or reuse programs. Hazardous waste typically contains toxic components such as lead and mercury that can contaminate soil and groundwater and have detrimental human health impacts if handled improperly. At the same time, e-waste contains components that can be recycled. Likewise, computers, cellular phones, and other electronic materials can be donated or re-sold at reduced cost to non-profit organizations and community groups. Given the environmental and workplace health hazards that arise from hazardous waste disposal and e-waste recycling, this credit is reserved for programs that take steps to ensure that workers’ basic safety is protected and environmental standards are met.<br><br><strong>Part 1</strong><br>Institution has strategies in place to safely dispose of all hazardous, special (e.g., coal ash), universal, and non- regulated chemical waste and seeks to minimize the presence of these materials on campus.<br><br><strong>Part 2</strong><br>Institution has a program in place to recycle, reuse, and/or refurbish electronic waste generated by the institution and/or its students. Institution ensures that the electronic waste is recycled responsibly by using a recycler certified under the e-Stewards® and/or Responsible Recycling (R2) standards.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for whether the institution has or participates in a program to responsibly recycle, reuse, and/or refurbish all electronic waste generated by the institution:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. </p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value. &nbsp;&nbsp;</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Operations </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Waste</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Hazardous Waste Management</strong>. <br></p></li><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>whether the institution has or participates in a program to responsibly recycle, reuse, and/or refurbish all electronic waste generated by the institution</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>waste, hazardous waste management, </em>and<em> electronics recycling.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>a brief description of the electronic waste recycling program(s)</strong></p></li><li><p><strong>a brief description of steps taken to ensure that e-waste is recycled responsibly, workers’ basic safety is protected, and environmental standards are met</strong></p></li><li><p><strong>the website URL where information about the institution’s electronic-waste recycling programs is available</strong></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br></p><p><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p><br><strong>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report on current programs at the time of submission.<br></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Institution_wide_Electronic_Waste_Recycling_Program+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642373,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Mechanism for Broad Sustainability Coordination",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Mechanism_for_Broad_Sustainability_Coordination.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Mechanism for Broad Sustainability Coordination",
      "question": "Does the institution have a mechanism for broad sustainability coordination for the entire institution?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This credit recognizes institutions with active committees, offices, or officers charged by the administration or board of trustees to coordinate sustainability work on campus. Institution-wide coordination helps institutions organize, implement, and publicize sustainability initiatives.<br><br>Institutions should have at least one sustainability committee, office, and/or officer tasked by the administration or governing body to advise on and implement policies and programs related to sustainability on campus. The committee, office, and/or officer focuses on sustainability broadly (i.e., not just one sustainability issue, such as climate change) and covers the entire institution.<br><br>An institution that has multiple committees, offices and/or staff with responsibility for subsets of the institution (e.g., schools or departments) may earn points for this credit if it has a mechanism for broad sustainability coordination for the entire campus (e.g., a coordinating committee or the equivalent). A committee, office, and/or officer that focuses on one aspect of sustainability (e.g., an energy efficiency committee) or has jurisdiction over only a part of the institution (e.g., “Academic Affairs Sustainability Taskforce”) does not count toward scoring in the absence of institution-wide coordination.",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for a mechanism for broad sustainability coordination for the entire institution:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p><p></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. </p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value. &nbsp;&nbsp;</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Planning &amp; Administration </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Coordination, Planning and Governance</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Sustainability Coordination</strong>. </p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>a mechanism for broad sustainability coordination for the entire institution</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like<em> sustainability mechanism </em>and<em> coordination.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like if the answer is <strong>yes</strong>:</p><ul><li><p><strong>a brief description of the activities and substantive accomplishments of the institution-wide coordinating body or officer during the previous three years</strong></p></li><li><p><strong>the website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available (optional)</strong></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br></p><p><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p><br>E.g. a campus-wide committee or an officer/office responsible for the entire campus<br></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Mechanism_for_Broad_Sustainability_Coordination+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642384,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Role for Students in Decision-making",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Role_for_Students_in_Decision_making.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Role for Students in Decision-making",
      "question": "Do students have a formal role in decision-making in regard to the following?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This credit recognizes institutions that engage students, staff, faculty and local community members in the ongoing governance of the college or university. Governance includes a variety of organizational functions and decision-making processes, from financial oversight and personnel management to goal-setting and strategic planning. Sustainability requires participatory processes and structures that empower stakeholder groups to come together and work collaboratively to address sustainability challenges through access to and involvement in institutional governance. Without transformed governance structures, many sustainability gains cannot be realized.<br><br><strong>Part 1</strong><br>Institution has adopted a framework for engaging internal stakeholders (i.e., students, staff, faculty) in governance. The framework includes:</p><ul><li><p>Representative bodies through which students, staff and/or faculty can each participate in governance (e.g., student council, staff council, faculty senate);</p></li></ul><p>And/or</p><ul><li><p>Elected student, staff and/or faculty representatives on the institution’s highest governing body. To count, representatives must be elected by their peers or appointed by a representative student, staff or faculty body or organization.</p></li></ul>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for which processes the students have a formal role in decision-making:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. </p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value. &nbsp;&nbsp;</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Planning &amp; Administration </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Coordination, Planning and Governance</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Governance</strong>. </p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>for which processes the students have a formal role in decision-making</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>students, formal role, </em>and<em> decision-making.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value<br></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>a brief description of the formal student role in regard to each area indicated, including examples from the previous three years</strong></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Establishing organizational mission vision and goals",
        "Establishing new policies programs and initiatives",
        "Strategic and long-term planning",
        "Existing or prospective physical resources",
        "Budgeting staffing and financial planning",
        "Communications processes and transparency practices",
        "Prioritization of programs and projects"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Role_for_Students_in_Decision_making+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642395,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Role for Non-supervisory Staff in Decision-making",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Role_for_Non_supervisory_Staff_in_Decision_making.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Role for Non-supervisory Staff in Decision-making",
      "question": "Do non-supervisory staff have a formal role in decision-making in regard to the following?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This credit recognizes institutions that engage students, staff, faculty and local community members in the ongoing governance of the college or university. Governance includes a variety of organizational functions and decision-making processes, from financial oversight and personnel management to goal-setting and strategic planning. Sustainability requires participatory processes and structures that empower stakeholder groups to come together and work collaboratively to address sustainability challenges through access to and involvement in institutional governance. Without transformed governance structures, many sustainability gains cannot be realized.<br><br><strong>Part 1</strong><br>Institution has adopted a framework for engaging internal stakeholders (i.e., students, staff, faculty) in governance. The framework includes:</p><ul><li><p>Representative bodies through which students, staff and/or faculty can each participate in governance (e.g., student council, staff council, faculty senate);</p></li></ul><p>And/or</p><ul><li><p>Elected student, staff and/or faculty representatives on the institution’s highest governing body. To count, representatives must be elected by their peers or appointed by a representative student, staff or faculty body or organization.</p></li></ul>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for which processes the non-supervisory staff have a formal role in decision-making:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. </p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value. &nbsp;&nbsp;</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Planning &amp; Administration </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Coordination, Planning and Governance</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Governance</strong>. </p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>for which processes the staff have a formal role in decision-making</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>non-supervisory staff, formal role, </em>and<em> decision-making.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value<br></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>a brief description of the formal staff role in regard to each area indicated, including examples from the previous three years</strong></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Establishing organizational mission vision and goals",
        "Establishing new policies programs and initiatives",
        "Strategic and long-term planning",
        "Existing or prospective physical resources",
        "Budgeting staffing and financial planning",
        "Communications processes and transparency practices",
        "Prioritization of programs and projects"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Role_for_Non_supervisory_Staff_in_Decision_making+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642406,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Role for Faculty in Decision-making",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Role_for_Faculty_in_Decision_making.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Role for Faculty in Decision-making",
      "question": "Do faculty have a formal role in decision-making in regard to the following?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This credit recognizes institutions that engage students, staff, faculty and local community members in the ongoing governance of the college or university. Governance includes a variety of organizational functions and decision-making processes, from financial oversight and personnel management to goal-setting and strategic planning. Sustainability requires participatory processes and structures that empower stakeholder groups to come together and work collaboratively to address sustainability challenges through access to and involvement in institutional governance. Without transformed governance structures, many sustainability gains cannot be realized.<br><br><strong>Part 1</strong><br>Institution has adopted a framework for engaging internal stakeholders (i.e., students, staff, faculty) in governance. The framework includes:</p><ul><li><p>Representative bodies through which students, staff and/or faculty can each participate in governance (e.g., student council, staff council, faculty senate);</p></li></ul><p>And/or</p><ul><li><p>Elected student, staff and/or faculty representatives on the institution’s highest governing body. To count, representatives must be elected by their peers or appointed by a representative student, staff or faculty body or organization.</p></li></ul>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for which processes the faculty have a formal role in decision-making:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. </p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value. &nbsp;&nbsp;</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Planning &amp; Administration </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Coordination, Planning and Governance</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Governance</strong>. </p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>for which processes the faculty have a formal role in decision-making</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>faculty, formal role, </em>and<em> decision-making.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value<br></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>a brief description of the formal faculty role in regard to each area indicated, including examples from the previous three years</strong></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Establishing organizational mission vision and goals",
        "Establishing new policies programs and initiatives",
        "Strategic and long-term planning",
        "Existing or prospective physical resources",
        "Budgeting staffing and financial planning",
        "Communications processes and transparency practices",
        "Prioritization of programs and projects"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Role_for_Faculty_in_Decision_making+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642417,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Diversity and Equity Post",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Diversity_and_Equity_Post.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Diversity and Equity Post",
      "question": "Does the institution have a diversity and equity committee, office, and/or officer tasked by the administration or governing body to advise on and implement policies, programs, and trainings related to diversity and equity on campus?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This credit recognizes institutions with active committees, offices, or officers charged by the administration or governing body to coordinate diversity, equity, inclusion and human rights work on campus. Diversity and equity coordination increases the ability of an institution to more effectively address these issues.<br><br><strong>Part 1</strong><br>Institution has a diversity and equity committee, office and/or officer (or the equivalent) tasked by the administration or governing body to advise on and implement policies, programs, and trainings related to diversity, equity, inclusion and human rights on campus. The committee, office and/or officer may focus on students and/or employees.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for whether the institution has a diversity and equity committee, office, and/or officer:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. </p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value. &nbsp;&nbsp;</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Planning &amp; Administration </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Diversity &amp; Affordability</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Diversity and Equity Coordination</strong>. </p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>whether the institution has a diversity and equity committee, office, and/or officer</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>committee, office </em>and<em> officer.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>a brief description of the diversity and equity committee, office and/or officer, including purview and activities</strong></p></li><li><p><strong>the website URL where information about the diversity and equity committee, office and/or officer is available</strong></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Diversity_and_Equity_Post+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642428,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Cultural Competence Trainings and Activities - for Students",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Cultural_Competence_Trainings_and_Activities_for_Students.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Cultural Competence Trainings and Activities - for Students",
      "question": "Does the institution make cultural competence trainings and activities available to all students?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This credit recognizes institutions with active committees, offices, or officers charged by the administration or governing body to coordinate diversity, equity, inclusion and human rights work on campus. Diversity and equity coordination increases the ability of an institution to more effectively address these issues.<br><br><strong>Part 2</strong><br>Institution makes cultural competence trainings and activities available to students, staff, and/or faculty.<br><br>The trainings and activities help participants build the awareness, knowledge, and skills necessary to work effectively in cross-cultural situations. Trainings and activities that focus exclusively on awareness, knowledge, or skills do not count.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for whether there are cultural competence trainings/activities available for all students:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time.</p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Planning &amp; Administration </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Diversity &amp; Affordability</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Diversity and Equity Coordination</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>whether there are cultural competence trainings/activities available for all students</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>cultural competence, training </em>and<em> activities.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>a brief description of the cultural competence trainings and activities</strong></p></li><li><p><strong>the website URL where information about the cultural competence trainings is available</strong></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Cultural_Competence_Trainings_and_Activities_for_Students+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642439,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Cultural Competence Trainings and Activities - for Staff",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Cultural_Competence_Trainings_and_Activities_for_Staff.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Cultural Competence Trainings and Activities - for Staff",
      "question": "Does the institution make cultural competence trainings and activities available to all staff?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This credit recognizes institutions with active committees, offices, or officers charged by the administration or governing body to coordinate diversity, equity, inclusion and human rights work on campus. Diversity and equity coordination increases the ability of an institution to more effectively address these issues.<br><br><strong>Part 2</strong><br>Institution makes cultural competence trainings and activities available to students, staff, and/or faculty.<br><br>The trainings and activities help participants build the awareness, knowledge, and skills necessary to work effectively in cross-cultural situations. Trainings and activities that focus exclusively on awareness, knowledge, or skills do not count.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for whether there are cultural competence trainings/activities available for all staff:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time.</p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Planning &amp; Administration </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Diversity &amp; Affordability</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Diversity and Equity Coordination</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>whether there are cultural competence trainings/activities available for all staff</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>cultural competence, training </em>and<em> activities.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>a brief description of the cultural competence trainings and activities</strong></p></li><li><p><strong>the website URL where information about the cultural competence trainings is available</strong></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Cultural_Competence_Trainings_and_Activities_for_Staff+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642450,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Cultural Competence Trainings and Activities - for Faculties",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Cultural_Competence_Trainings_and_Activities_for_Faculties.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Cultural Competence Trainings and Activities - for Faculties",
      "question": "Does the institution make cultural competence trainings and activities available to all faculty?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This credit recognizes institutions with active committees, offices, or officers charged by the administration or governing body to coordinate diversity, equity, inclusion and human rights work on campus. Diversity and equity coordination increases the ability of an institution to more effectively address these issues.<br><br><strong>Part 2</strong><br>Institution makes cultural competence trainings and activities available to students, staff, and/or faculty.<br><br>The trainings and activities help participants build the awareness, knowledge, and skills necessary to work effectively in cross-cultural situations. Trainings and activities that focus exclusively on awareness, knowledge, or skills do not count.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for whether there are cultural competence trainings/activities available for all faculties:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time.</p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Planning &amp; Administration </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Diversity &amp; Affordability</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Diversity and Equity Coordination</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>whether there are cultural competence trainings/activities available for all faculties</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>cultural competence, training </em>and<em> activities.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>a brief description of the cultural competence trainings and activities</strong></p></li><li><p><strong>the website URL where information about the cultural competence trainings is available</strong></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Cultural_Competence_Trainings_and_Activities_for_Faculties+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642461,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Cultural Competence Trainings and Activities - for Administrators",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Cultural_Competence_Trainings_and_Activities_for_Administrators.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Cultural Competence Trainings and Activities - for Administrators",
      "question": "Does the institution make cultural competence training and activities available to all administrators?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This credit recognizes institutions with active committees, offices, or officers charged by the administration or governing body to coordinate diversity, equity, inclusion and human rights work on campus. Diversity and equity coordination increases the ability of an institution to more effectively address these issues.<br><br><strong>Part 2</strong><br>Institution makes cultural competence trainings and activities available to students, staff, and/or faculty.<br><br>The trainings and activities help participants build the awareness, knowledge, and skills necessary to work effectively in cross-cultural situations. Trainings and activities that focus exclusively on awareness, knowledge, or skills do not count.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for whether there are cultural competence trainings/activities available for all administrators:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time.</p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Planning &amp; Administration </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Diversity &amp; Affordability</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Diversity and Equity Coordination</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>whether there are cultural competence trainings/activities available for all administrators</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>cultural competence, training </em>and<em> activities.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>a brief description of the cultural competence trainings and activities</strong></p></li><li><p><strong>the website URL where information about the cultural competence trainings is available</strong></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Cultural_Competence_Trainings_and_Activities_for_Administrators+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642472,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Housing Options to Accommodate Transgender Students",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Housing_Options_to_Accommodate_Transgender_Students.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Housing Options to Accommodate Transgender Students",
      "question": "Does the institution offer housing options to accommodate the special needs of transgender and transitioning students?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This credit recognizes institutions that have programs in place to support underrepresented groups and foster a more diverse and inclusive campus community. Certain challenges accompany being a minority on campus. Schools can help create and maintain a diverse student body and help build diversity within academic disciplines and across higher education broadly by offering support programs to help individuals in underrepresented groups thrive academically and socially.",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for whether the institution offers housing options to accommodate the special needs of transgender and transitioning students:</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. </p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value. &nbsp;&nbsp;<br></p></li><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Planning &amp; Administration </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Diversity &amp; Affordability</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Support for Underrepresented Groups</strong>. </p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>whether the institution offers housing options to accommodate the special needs of transgender and transitioning students</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>transgender, transitioning </em>and<em> special housing needs.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information</p><p></p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Housing_Options_to_Accommodate_Transgender_Students+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642482,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Entering Students from Low-income (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Entering_Students_from_Low_income.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Entering Students from Low-income (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of entering students that come from lower income backgrounds?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This credit recognizes institutions that are implementing strategies to improve their accessibility and affordability. Achieving a college degree is a valuable tool in addressing inequity, but in order for higher education to help society move toward greater equity, schools must be accessible to low-income populations and non-traditional students.",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the percentage of entering students that come from lower income backgrounds:</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time.</p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Planning &amp; Administration </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Diversity &amp; Affordability</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Affordability and Access</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the percentage of entering students that come from lower income backgrounds</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>lower income, </em>and<em> student background.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p><p></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information</p></li></ul><p><br>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br></p><p><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>Report on the institution’s largest admissions group or student cohort (e.g., undergraduate students). Institutions may choose to include or omit smaller schools or departments within the institution.<br><br>Institutions may meet student financial need in a variety of ways, for example:</p><ul><li><p>Scholarships and grants</p></li><li><p>Self-help (e.g., work study, employment)</p></li><li><p>Tuition waivers or not requiring tuition</p></li><li><p>Subsidized or no-interest loans</p></li><li><p>Athletic awards</p></li></ul><p><br>Exclude non-need-based aid, any aid awarded in excess of need, and unsubsidized or interest-bearing loans. Institutions that do not assess student need as a matter of standard practice may report the percentage of cost met, on average, for low-income students.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Entering_Students_from_Low_income+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642493,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Graduation &#47; Success Rate for Low-income Students",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Graduation_Success_Rate_for_Low_income_Students.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Graduation &#47; Success Rate for Low-income Students",
      "question": "What is the institution's graduation/success rate for low-income students?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This credit recognizes institutions that are implementing strategies to improve their accessibility and affordability. Achieving a college degree is a valuable tool in addressing inequity, but in order for higher education to help society move toward greater equity, schools must be accessible to low-income populations and non-traditional students.",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the institution's graduation rate for low-income students:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. </p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value. &nbsp;&nbsp;</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Planning &amp; Administration </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Diversity &amp; Affordability</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Affordability &amp; Access</strong>. </p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the institution's graduation rate for low-income students</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>low-income students, graduation rate, </em>and<em> success rate.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information</p></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br></p><p><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>Report on the institution’s largest admissions group or student cohort (e.g., undergraduate students). Institutions may choose to include or omit smaller schools or departments within the institution.<br><br>Institutions may report graduation rates, success rates and/or combined graduation/success rates as appropriate to their particular context and types of programs offered.<br><br>Institutions may meet student financial need in a variety of ways, for example:</p><ul><li><p>Scholarships and grants</p></li><li><p>Self-help (e.g., work study, employment)</p></li><li><p>Tuition waivers or not requiring tuition</p></li><li><p>Subsidized or no-interest loans</p></li><li><p>Athletic awards</p></li></ul><p><br>Exclude non-need-based aid, any aid awarded in excess of need, and unsubsidized or interest-bearing loans. Institutions that do not assess student need as a matter of standard practice may report the percentage of cost met, on average, for low-income students.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Graduation_Success_Rate_for_Low_income_Students+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642504,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Students Graduating with No Interest-bearing Student Loan Debt (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Students_Graduating_with_No_Interest_bearing_Student_Loan_Debt.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Students Graduating with No Interest-bearing Student Loan Debt (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of students graduating with no interest-bearing student loan debt?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This credit recognizes institutions that are implementing strategies to improve their accessibility and affordability. Achieving a college degree is a valuable tool in addressing inequity, but in order for higher education to help society move toward greater equity, schools must be accessible to low-income populations and non-traditional students.",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the percentage of students graduating with no interest-bearing student loan debt:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research<br></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. </p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value. &nbsp;&nbsp;</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Planning &amp; Administration </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Diversity &amp; Affordability</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Affordability and Access</strong>. </p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the percentage of students graduating with no interest-bearing student loan debt</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>student loan, student debt, </em>and<em> interest-bearing.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value<br></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information</p></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br></p><p><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p><strong><br>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>Report on the institution’s largest admissions group or student cohort (e.g., undergraduate students). Institutions may choose to include or omit smaller schools or departments within the institution.<br><br>Institutions may report graduation rates, success rates and/or combined graduation/success rates as appropriate to their particular context and types of programs offered.<br><br>Institutions may meet student financial need in a variety of ways, for example:</p><ul><li><p>Scholarships and grants</p></li><li><p>Self-help (e.g., work study, employment)</p></li><li><p>Tuition waivers or not requiring tuition</p></li><li><p>Subsidized or no-interest loans</p></li><li><p>Athletic awards</p></li></ul><p><br>Exclude non-need-based aid, any aid awarded in excess of need, and unsubsidized or interest-bearing loans. Institutions that do not assess student need as a matter of standard practice may report the percentage of cost met, on average, for low-income students.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Students_Graduating_with_No_Interest_bearing_Student_Loan_Debt+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642515,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Total Value of Investment Pool",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Total_Value_of_Investment_Pool.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Total Value of Investment Pool",
      "question": "What is the total value ($) of the institution's investment pool?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This credit recognizes institutions that use their investment power to promote sustainability. There are a variety of approaches an institution can take toward sustainable investment, including making positive investments that promote sustainability and engaging with companies in which they already hold investments. Positive investing supports socially and environmentally responsible practices and the development of sustainable products and services. Active investor engagement can help align an institution’s investments with its values, protect the institution from the financial consequences of fines, lawsuits, customer boycotts and damages to a company’s reputation that may result from unsustainable corporate behavior, and improve the sustainability performance of the businesses it invests in. Both types of activities contribute toward a more just and sustainable financial system.",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the total value ($) of the institution's investment pool:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time.</p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Planning &amp; Administration </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Investment</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Sustainable Investment</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the total value ($) of the institution's investment pool</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>investment pool </em>and<em> investment value.</em></p><p></p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value<br></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information<br></p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br></p><p><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:<br><br>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report on current policies and actions taken within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br><em>Option 1</em><br>Report on a snapshot of the entire investment portfolio. Reporting on a sample of the endowment or a special fund of the endowment is not allowed for this credit. Institutions should strive to report on a representative snapshot. Institutions for which investments are handled by the university system, a separate foundation of the institution and/or a management company contracted by the institution should report on the combined activities of those entities to the extent possible and document any anomalies under “Notes about the submission”.<br><br><em>Option 2</em><br>Institutions for which investments are handled by the university system, a separate foundation of the institution and/or a management company contracted by the institution should report on the combined activities of those entities.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "$ US/Canadian",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Total_Value_of_Investment_Pool+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642526,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Holdings in Sustainable Industries",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Holdings_in_Sustainable_Industries.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Holdings in Sustainable Industries",
      "question": "What is the value ($) of the institution's holdings in sustainable industries (e.g. renewable energy or sustainable forestry)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This credit recognizes institutions that use their investment power to promote sustainability. There are a variety of approaches an institution can take toward sustainable investment, including making positive investments that promote sustainability and engaging with companies in which they already hold investments. Positive investing supports socially and environmentally responsible practices and the development of sustainable products and services. Active investor engagement can help align an institution’s investments with its values, protect the institution from the financial consequences of fines, lawsuits, customer boycotts and damages to a company’s reputation that may result from unsustainable corporate behavior, and improve the sustainability performance of the businesses it invests in. Both types of activities contribute toward a more just and sustainable financial system.",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the value ($) of the institution's holdings in sustainable industries:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. </p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value. &nbsp;&nbsp;</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Planning &amp; Administration </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Investment</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Sustainable Investment</strong>. </p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the value ($) of the institution's holdings in sustainable industries</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>sustainable industries, investment, </em>and<em> holding.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>a brief description of the companies, funds, and/or institutions.</strong> Specific disclosure of holdings (e.g., fund or company names) is not required; general information about the industries or fund types represented by the holdings is sufficient</p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br></p><p><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report on current policies and actions taken within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br><em>Option 1</em><br>Report on a snapshot of the entire investment portfolio. Reporting on a sample of the endowment or a special fund of the endowment is not allowed for this credit. Institutions should strive to report on a representative snapshot. Institutions for which investments are handled by the university system, a separate foundation of the institution and/or a management company contracted by the institution should report on the combined activities of those entities to the extent possible and document any anomalies under “Notes about the submission”.<br><br><em>Option 2</em><br>Institutions for which investments are handled by the university system, a separate foundation of the institution and/or a management company contracted by the institution should report on the combined activities of those entities.<br><br>Sustainable industries (e.g., renewable energy or sustainable forestry). <br>This may include any investment directly in an entire industry sector as well as holdings of companies whose entire business is sustainable (e.g., a manufacturer of wind turbines).<br></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "$ US/Canadian",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Holdings_in_Sustainable_Industries+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642537,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Holdings in Exemplary Sustainability Performance Businesses",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Holdings_in_Exemplary_Sustainability_Performance_Businesses.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Holdings in Exemplary Sustainability Performance Businesses",
      "question": "What is the value ($) of the institution's holdings in businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance (e.g. using criteria specified in a sustainable investment policy)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This credit recognizes institutions that use their investment power to promote sustainability. There are a variety of approaches an institution can take toward sustainable investment, including making positive investments that promote sustainability and engaging with companies in which they already hold investments. Positive investing supports socially and environmentally responsible practices and the development of sustainable products and services. Active investor engagement can help align an institution’s investments with its values, protect the institution from the financial consequences of fines, lawsuits, customer boycotts and damages to a company’s reputation that may result from unsustainable corporate behavior, and improve the sustainability performance of the businesses it invests in. Both types of activities contribute toward a more just and sustainable financial system.",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the value ($) of the institution's holdings in businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time.</p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Planning &amp; Administration </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Investment</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Sustainable Investment</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the value ($) of the institution's holdings in businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>exemplary sustainability, investment, </em>and<em> holdings in businesses.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>a brief description of the companies, funds, and/or institutions.</strong> Specific disclosure of holdings (e.g., fund or company names) is not required; general information about the industries or fund types represented by the holdings is sufficient</p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br></p><p><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report on current policies and actions taken within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br><em>Option 1</em><br>Report on a snapshot of the entire investment portfolio. Reporting on a sample of the endowment or a special fund of the endowment is not allowed for this credit. Institutions should strive to report on a representative snapshot. Institutions for which investments are handled by the university system, a separate foundation of the institution and/or a management company contracted by the institution should report on the combined activities of those entities to the extent possible and document any anomalies under “Notes about the submission”.<br><br><em>Option 2</em><br>Institutions for which investments are handled by the university system, a separate foundation of the institution and/or a management company contracted by the institution should report on the combined activities of those entities.<br><br>Businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance (e.g., using criteria specified in a sustainable investment policy). This includes investments made, at least in part, because of a company's social or environmental performance. Existing stock in a company that happens to have socially or environmentally responsible practices should not be included unless the investment decision was based, at least in part, on the company's sustainability performance.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "$ US/Canadian",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Holdings_in_Exemplary_Sustainability_Performance_Businesses+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2642548,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Negative Screens Included in Sustainable Investment Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Negative_Screens_Included_in_Sustainable_Investment_Policy.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Negative Screens Included in Sustainable Investment Policy",
      "question": "Does the institution's sustainable investment policy include negative screens?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This credit recognizes institutions that use their investment power to promote sustainability. There are a variety of approaches an institution can take toward sustainable investment, including making positive investments that promote sustainability and engaging with companies in which they already hold investments. Positive investing supports socially and environmentally responsible practices and the development of sustainable products and services. Active investor engagement can help align an institution’s investments with its values, protect the institution from the financial consequences of fines, lawsuits, customer boycotts and damages to a company’s reputation that may result from unsustainable corporate behavior, and improve the sustainability performance of the businesses it invests in. Both types of activities contribute toward a more just and sustainable financial system.",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for whether the institution's sustainable investment policy include negative screens:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time.</p><p></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Planning &amp; Administration </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Investment</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title:<strong> Sustainable Investment</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>whether the institution's sustainable investment policy include negative screens</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>investment policy, sustainable investment, </em>and<em> negative screens.</em></p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>a brief description of the negative screens and how they have been implemented</strong></p></li><li><p><strong>approximate percentage of endowment that the negative screens apply to (0-100)</strong></p></li><li><p><strong>the website URL where information about the institution's sustainable investment efforts is available</strong></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br></p><p><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report on current policies and actions taken within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br><em>Option 1</em><br>Report on a snapshot of the entire investment portfolio. Reporting on a sample of the endowment or a special fund of the endowment is not allowed for this credit. Institutions should strive to report on a representative snapshot. Institutions for which investments are handled by the university system, a separate foundation of the institution and/or a management company contracted by the institution should report on the combined activities of those entities to the extent possible and document any anomalies under “Notes about the submission”.<br><br><em>Option 2</em><br>Institutions for which investments are handled by the university system, a separate foundation of the institution and/or a management company contracted by the institution should report on the combined activities of those entities.<br><br>This metrics assesses whether the institution has a publicly available investment policy with negative screens, for example to prohibit investment in an industry (e.g., tobacco or weapons manufacturing) or participate in a divestment effort (e.g., targeting fossil fuel production or human rights violations)<br></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Negative_Screens_Included_in_Sustainable_Investment_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2644441,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+SDG1 (No Poverty) Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG1_No_Poverty_Actions.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "SDG1 (No Poverty) Actions",
      "question": "Which actions did the company report on which are relevant to addressing SDG 1 (No Poverty)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The purpose of this metric is to record actions that a company has taken which contribute to [[https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg1|SDG 1]]</p><p>“Actions“ in this context are loosely defined, and the list of relevant actions is a work in progress, please add new response options (through “Update Value Type“) when you see an action which isn’t covered by any of the existing options. The question of what “counts“ as a relevant action for a particular SDG is an open one, and this metric can be used as a space for collaboratively figuring that out.</p><p>To add data for this metric, please select the appropriate categories from the list and <strong>include quotations from the report </strong>that give more detail on the actions. If you see a relevant action in a company’s report that isn’t represented in the current list of options, consider adding a new option for it, following the instructions above.</p><p></p><p>List of possible answers and description of what they mean:</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG1_No_Poverty_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2644456,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+SDG13 (Climate Action) Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG13_Climate_Action_Actions.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "SDG13 (Climate Action) Actions",
      "question": "Did the company report actions taken which are relevant to addressing SDG 13 (Climate Action)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The purpose of this metric is to record actions that a company has taken which contribute to [[https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg13|SDG 13]]</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">“Actions“ in this context are loosely defined - and often by companies themselves. The question of what “counts“ as a relevant action for a particular SDG is an open one, and this metric can be used as a space for collaboratively figuring that out.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">“Actions“ towards an SDG are loosely defined - and often by companies themselves. To find our whether a company reports taking actions relevant to addressing SDG 13 (Climate Action), look at Annual and Sustainability reports to find out. Choose one of the following answers options below according to your research findings:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Yes</strong><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">, and they are related to the company's material operations</span></li>\r\n<li><strong>Yes, and they are not related to the company's material operations</strong></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes, and they include actions both <em>related to,</em> and <em>not related to,</em> the company's material operations </span></li>\r\n<li><strong>No</strong></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Be sure to <strong>include the company's actions in the</strong> <strong>comment field </strong>to provide context. If you see a relevant action in a company’s report that isn’t represented in the current list of options, select \"Yes\" and add the context in the comments.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong>Keywords</strong>: SDG13, Climate Action, SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals, Global Goals</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes, and they are related to the company's material operations",
        "Yes, and they are not related to the company's material operations",
        "Yes, and they include actions both related to, and not related to, the company's material operations",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 201,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 70,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Wollongong_Research_Group_2020+Wollongong_2020_Climate_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG13_Climate_Action_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2644472,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+SDG6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG6_Clean_Water_and_Sanitation_Actions.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "SDG6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) Actions",
      "question": "Which actions did the company report on which are relevant to addressing SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The purpose of this metric is to record actions that a company has taken which contribute to [[https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg6|SDG 6]]</p><p>“Actions“ in this context are loosely defined, and the list of relevant actions is a work in progress, please add new response options (through “Update Value Type“) when you see an action which isn’t covered by any of the existing options. The question of what “counts“ as a relevant action for a particular SDG is an open one, and this metric can be used as a space for collaboratively figuring that out.</p><p>To add data for this metric, please select the appropriate categories from the list and <strong>include quotations from the report </strong>that give more detail on the actions. If you see a relevant action in a company’s report that isn’t represented in the current list of options, consider adding a new option for it, following the instructions above.</p><p></p><p>List of possible answers and description of what they mean:</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG6_Clean_Water_and_Sanitation_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2644500,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+SDG15 (Life on Land) Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG15_Life_on_Land_Actions.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "SDG15 (Life on Land) Actions",
      "question": "Which actions did the company report on which are relevant to addressing SDG 15 (Life on Land)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The purpose of this metric is to record actions that a company has taken which contribute to [[https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg15|SDG 15]]</p><p>“Actions“ in this context are loosely defined, and the list of relevant actions is a work in progress, please add new response options (through “Update Value Type“) when you see an action which isn’t covered by any of the existing options. The question of what “counts“ as a relevant action for a particular SDG is an open one, and this metric can be used as a space for collaboratively figuring that out.</p><p>To add data for this metric, please select the appropriate categories from the list and <strong>include quotations from the report </strong>that give more detail on the actions. If you see a relevant action in a company’s report that isn’t represented in the current list of options, consider adding a new option for it, following the instruction above.</p><p></p><p>List of possible answers and description of what they mean:</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG15_Life_on_Land_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2644517,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+SDG14 (Life below Water) Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG14_Life_below_Water_Actions.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "SDG14 (Life below Water) Actions",
      "question": "Which actions did the company report on which are relevant to addressing SDG 14 (Life below Water)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The purpose of this metric is to record actions that a company has taken which contribute to [[https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg14|SDG 14]]</p><p>“Actions“ in this context are loosely defined, and the list of relevant actions is a work in progress, please add new response options (through “Update Value Type“) when you see an action which isn’t covered by any of the existing options. The question of what “counts“ as a relevant action for a particular SDG is an open one, and this metric can be used as a space for collaboratively figuring that out.</p><p>To add data for this metric, please select the appropriate categories from the list and <strong>include quotations from the report </strong>that give more detail on the actions. If you see a relevant action in a company’s report that isn’t represented in the current list of options, consider adding a new option for it, following the instructions above.</p><p></p><p>List of possible answers and description of what they mean:</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG14_Life_below_Water_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2644647,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+SDG16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG16_Peace_Justice_and_Strong_Institutions_Actions.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "SDG16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) Actions",
      "question": "Did the company's report describe activities which contribute to achieving SDG16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The purpose of this metric is to record actions that a company has taken which contribute to [[https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg16|SDG16]]</p><p>“Actions“ in this context are loosely defined, and the list of relevant actions is a work in progress, please add new response options (through “Update Value Type“) when you see an action which isn’t covered by any of the existing options. The question of what “counts“ as a relevant action for a particular SDG is an open one, and this metric can be used as a space for collaboratively figuring that out.</p><p>To add data for this metric, please select the appropriate categories from the list and <strong>include quotations from the report </strong>that give more detail on the actions. If you see a relevant action in a company’s report that isn’t represented in the current list of options, consider adding a new option for it, following the instructions above.</p><p></p><p>List of possible answers and description of what they mean:</p><p>YES</p><p>NO</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG16_Peace_Justice_and_Strong_Institutions_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2644658,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+SDG2 (No Hunger) Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG2_No_Hunger_Actions.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "SDG2 (No Hunger) Actions",
      "question": "Did the company's report describe activities which contribute to achieving SDG2 (No Hunger)? (Please list)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The purpose of this metric is to record actions that a company has taken which contribute to [[https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg2|SDG2]].</p>\r\n<p>“Actions“ in this context are loosely defined, and the list of relevant actions is a work in progress, please add new response options (through “Update Value Type“) when you see an action which isn’t covered by any of the existing options. The question of what “counts“ as a relevant action for a particular SDG is an open one, and this metric can be used as a space for collaboratively figuring that out.</p>\r\n<p>To add data for this metric, please select the appropriate categories from the list and <strong>include quotations from the report </strong>that give more detail on the actions. If you see a relevant action in a company’s report that isn’t represented in the current list of options, consider adding a new option for it, following the instructions above.</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 22,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG2_No_Hunger_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2644672,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+SDG3 (Good Health and Well-being) Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG3_Good_Health_and_Well_being_Actions.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "SDG3 (Good Health and Well-being) Actions",
      "question": "Did the company's report describe activities which contribute to achieving SDG3 (Good Health and Well-being)? (Please list)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The purpose of this metric is to record actions that a company has taken which contribute to [[https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg3|SDG3]].</p><p>“Actions“ in this context are loosely defined, and the list of relevant actions is a work in progress, please add new response options (through “Update Value Type“) when you see an action which isn’t covered by any of the existing options. The question of what “counts“ as a relevant action for a particular SDG is an open one, and this metric can be used as a space for collaboratively figuring that out.</p><p>To add data for this metric, please select the appropriate categories from the list and&nbsp;<strong>include quotations from the report&nbsp;</strong>that give more detail on the actions. If you see a relevant action in a company’s report that isn’t represented in the current list of options, consider adding a new option for it, following the instructions above.</p><p></p><p>List of possible answers and description of what they mean:</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG3_Good_Health_and_Well_being_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2644682,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+SDG4 (Quality Education) Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG4_Quality_Education_Actions.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "SDG4 (Quality Education) Actions",
      "question": "Did the company's report describe activities which contribute to achieving SDG4 (Quality Education)? (Please list) ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The purpose of this metric is to record actions that a company has taken which contribute to [[https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg4|SDG4]].</p><p>“Actions“ in this context are loosely defined, and the list of relevant actions is a work in progress, please add new response options (through “Update Value Type“) when you see an action which isn’t covered by any of the existing options. The question of what “counts“ as a relevant action for a particular SDG is an open one, and this metric can be used as a space for collaboratively figuring that out.</p><p>To add data for this metric, please select the appropriate categories from the list and&nbsp;<strong>include quotations from the report&nbsp;</strong>that give more detail on the actions. If you see a relevant action in a company’s report that isn’t represented in the current list of options, consider adding a new option for it, following the instructions above.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 29,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 7,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG4_Quality_Education_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2644692,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+SDG7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG7_Affordable_and_Clean_Energy_Actions.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "SDG7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) Actions",
      "question": "Did the company's report describe activities which contribute to achieving SDG7 (Affordable and Clean Energy)? (Please list)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The purpose of this metric is to record actions that a company has taken which contribute to [[https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg7|SDG7]].</p><p>“Actions“ in this context are loosely defined, and the list of relevant actions is a work in progress, please add new response options (through “Update Value Type“) when you see an action which isn’t covered by any of the existing options. The question of what “counts“ as a relevant action for a particular SDG is an open one, and this metric can be used as a space for collaboratively figuring that out.</p><p>To add data for this metric, please select the appropriate categories from the list and&nbsp;<strong>include quotations from the report&nbsp;</strong>that give more detail on the actions. If you see a relevant action in a company’s report that isn’t represented in the current list of options, consider adding a new option for it, following the instructions above.</p><p></p><p>List of possible answers and description of what they mean:</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG7_Affordable_and_Clean_Energy_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2644702,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+SDG9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure)  Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG9_Industry_Innovation_and_Infrastructure_Actions.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "SDG9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure)  Actions",
      "question": "Did the company's report describe activities which contribute to achieving SDG9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure)? (Please list)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The purpose of this metric is to record actions that a company has taken which contribute to [[https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg9|SDG9]]. </p>\r\n<p>“Actions“ in this context are loosely defined, and the list of relevant actions is a work in progress, please add new response options (through “Update Value Type“) when you see an action which isn’t covered by any of the existing options. The question of what “counts“ as a relevant action for a particular SDG is an open one, and this metric can be used as a space for collaboratively figuring that out.</p>\r\n<p>To add data for this metric, please select the appropriate categories from the list and <strong>include quotations from the report </strong>that give more detail on the actions. If you see a relevant action in a company’s report that isn’t represented in the current list of options, consider adding a new option for it, following the instructions above.</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 17,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG9_Industry_Innovation_and_Infrastructure_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2644710,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+SDG10 (Reduced Inequalities) Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG10_Reduced_Inequalities_Actions.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "SDG10 (Reduced Inequalities) Actions",
      "question": "Did the company's report describe activities which contribute to achieving SDG10 (Reduced Inequalities)? (Please list)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The purpose of this metric is to record actions that a company has taken which contribute to [[https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg10|SDG10]].</p><p>“Actions“ in this context are loosely defined, and the list of relevant actions is a work in progress, please add new response options (through “Update Value Type“) when you see an action which isn’t covered by any of the existing options. The question of what “counts“ as a relevant action for a particular SDG is an open one, and this metric can be used as a space for collaboratively figuring that out.</p><p>To add data for this metric, please select the appropriate categories from the list and&nbsp;<strong>include quotations from the report&nbsp;</strong>that give more detail on the actions. If you see a relevant action in a company’s report that isn’t represented in the current list of options, consider adding a new option for it, following the instructions above.</p><p></p><p>List of possible answers and description of what they mean:</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG10_Reduced_Inequalities_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2644732,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+SDG17 (Partnerships for the Goals) Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG17_Partnerships_for_the_Goals_Actions.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "SDG17 (Partnerships for the Goals) Actions",
      "question": "Did the company's report describe activities which contribute to achieving SDG17 (Partnerships for the Goals)? (Please list)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The purpose of this metric is to record actions that a company has taken which contribute to [[https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg17|SDG17]].</p>\r\n<p>“Actions“ in this context are loosely defined, and the list of relevant actions is a work in progress, please add new response options (through “Update Value Type“) when you see an action which isn’t covered by any of the existing options. The question of what “counts“ as a relevant action for a particular SDG is an open one, and this metric can be used as a space for collaboratively figuring that out.</p>\r\n<p>To add data for this metric, please select the appropriate categories from the list and <strong>include quotations from the report </strong>that give more detail on the actions. If you see a relevant action in a company’s report that isn’t represented in the current list of options, consider adding a new option for it, following the instructions above.</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 7,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+SDG17_Partnerships_for_the_Goals_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2671254,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Electricity from Biomass (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Electricity_from_Biomass.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Electricity from Biomass (%)",
      "question": "What percentage (%) electricity used by the institution is generated from biomass?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>For most institutions, energy consumption is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, which cause global climate change. Global climate change is having myriad negative impacts throughout the world, including increased frequency and potency of extreme weather events, sea level rise, species extinction, water shortages, declining agricultural production, ocean acidification, and spread of diseases. The impacts are particularly pronounced for vulnerable and poor communities and countries. In addition to causing global climate change, energy generation from fossil fuels, especially coal, produces air pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury, dioxins, arsenic, cadmium and lead. These pollutants contribute to acid rain as well as health problems such as heart and respiratory diseases and cancer. Coal mining and oil and gas drilling can also damage environmentally and/or culturally significant ecosystems. Nuclear power creates highly toxic and long-lasting radioactive waste. Large-scale hydropower projects flood habitats and disrupt fish migration and can involve the relocation of entire communities.<br><br>Implementing conservation measures and switching to renewable sources of energy can help institutions save money and protect them from utility rate volatility. Renewable energy may be generated locally and allow campuses to support local economic development. Furthermore, institutions can help shape markets by creating demand for cleaner, renewable sources of energy.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the percentage of electricity used by the institution that is generated from biomass:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research<br></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. <br></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Institutional Characteristics</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Operational Characteristics</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the percentage of electricity used by the institution that is generated from biomass</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>energy source </em>and<em> biomass.</em><br></p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value<br></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information</p><p></p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p><strong><br>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission. Institutions may choose the annual start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month period.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>Report all on-site, stationary energy that was consumed by the institution (as the institution is defined in the overall STARS institutional boundary). Transportation fuels are excluded. Reporting on a sample or subset of energy generation and consumption is not allowed for this credit.<br><br>All reported energy figures should be based on site energy (the amount of energy consumed on campus) rather than source energy (the amount of energy consumed on campus plus the energy used off-site to generate and transport the energy to the institution).<br><br>Institutions that convert fuel on-site (e.g., on-campus cogeneration facilities and boilers) should report only the amount of fuel purchased/converted toward the total energy consumption figure, not the resulting heat, steam, hot/chilled water or electricity.<br><br>To aggregate energy consumption data from multiple sources, figures should be converted into MMBtu (one million British thermal units—a standard measure of energy) using the following equivalents:<br><br>---- insert conversion table ----<br><br>A unit conversion tool that includes more detailed conversion factors (e.g., for liquid fuels) is available in the online STARS Reporting Tool (.xls).</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+STARS_Total_Percentage_of_Renewable_Energy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Electricity_from_Biomass+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2671292,
      "name": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)+Total Energy Consumption (MMBtu) - Performance Year",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Total_Energy_Consumption_MMBtu_Performance_Year.json",
      "designer": "Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS)",
      "title": "Total Energy Consumption (MMBtu) - Performance Year",
      "question": "What is the institution’s total energy consumption (all sources, excluding transportation fuels) during the performance year (MMBtu)?\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>For most institutions, energy consumption is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, which cause global climate change. Global climate change is having myriad negative impacts throughout the world, including increased frequency and potency of extreme weather events, sea level rise, species extinction, water shortages, declining agricultural production, ocean acidification, and spread of diseases. The impacts are particularly pronounced for vulnerable and poor communities and countries. In addition to causing global climate change, energy generation from fossil fuels, especially coal, produces air pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury, dioxins, arsenic, cadmium and lead. These pollutants contribute to acid rain as well as health problems such as heart and respiratory diseases and cancer. Coal mining and oil and gas drilling can also damage environmentally and/or culturally significant ecosystems. Nuclear power creates highly toxic and long-lasting radioactive waste. Large-scale hydropower projects flood habitats and disrupt fish migration and can involve the relocation of entire communities.<br><br>Implementing conservation measures and switching to renewable sources of energy can help institutions save money and protect them from utility rate volatility. Renewable energy may be generated locally and allow campuses to support local economic development. Furthermore, institutions can help shape markets by creating demand for cleaner, renewable sources of energy.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p></p><p><strong>This metric is looking for the total amount of energy consumed by the institution during the performance year:</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p><p>Institutions who report to the STARS program are listed on the [[|STARS Participants &amp; Reports]] website.</p><ul><li><p>Use the institution Index, CTRL F, or Command F to search for the institution you want to research<br></p></li><li><p>By clicking on the hyperlinked name of the institution, you will be redirected to the page where all their STARS reports are listed. You can select either the most recent report, or one of the older reports to start tracking their performance over time. <br></p><p><strong>NB:</strong> While the values in the reports might apply to different points in time (performance year, baseline year, most recent, etc.), <strong>the submission date of the report should be listed as the “year” on Wikirate</strong>. This is to ensure that reports of the same submission year can be compared. Any time specific information for the individual values should be included in the comment to that specific metric value.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>To narrow down your search, navigate the reports’ index using the Reporting Category - <strong>Operations </strong>- and Credit Category - <strong>Energy</strong> - to finally select the Credit Title: <strong>Clean and Renewable Energy</strong>.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>You should now be on the report page that discloses <strong>the total amount of energy consumed by the institution during the performance year</strong>. To locate the exact value you can search the page using CTRL F or Command F with keywords like <em>energy consumed </em>and<em> performance year.</em><br></p></li><li><p>Always check the metric question and methodology for the unit of measure or currency - researchers may need to carry out [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] before entering the final metric value<br></p></li><li><p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] to include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value and document any relevant contextual information, like:</p><ul><li><p><strong>the start and end date of the performance year</strong></p></li></ul><p></p></li></ul><p>Further guidance on how to research values is available [[Using Wikirate|here]], including detailed guidance on adding, editing and [[checking metric values]].</p><p><br><strong>STARS compliance guidance for institutions:</strong></p><p><strong><br>Timeframe</strong><br>Institutions should report the most recent data available from within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission. Institutions may choose the annual start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month period.<br><br><strong>Sampling and Data Standards</strong><br>Report all on-site, stationary energy that was consumed by the institution (as the institution is defined in the overall STARS institutional boundary). Transportation fuels are excluded. Reporting on a sample or subset of energy generation and consumption is not allowed for this credit.<br><br>All reported energy figures should be based on site energy (the amount of energy consumed on campus) rather than source energy (the amount of energy consumed on campus plus the energy used off-site to generate and transport the energy to the institution).<br><br>Institutions that convert fuel on-site (e.g., on-campus cogeneration facilities and boilers) should report only the amount of fuel purchased/converted toward the total energy consumption figure, not the resulting heat, steam, hot/chilled water or electricity.<br><br>To aggregate energy consumption data from multiple sources, figures should be converted into MMBtu (one million British thermal units—a standard measure of energy) using the following equivalents:<br><br>---- insert conversion table ----<br><br>A unit conversion tool that includes more detailed conversion factors (e.g., for liquid fuels) is available in the online STARS Reporting Tool (.xls).</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "MMBtu",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+STARS_Total_Renewable_Energy_Consumed_kWh.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+STARS_Total_Amount_of_Energy_kWh_Consumed_per_Student.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainability_Tracking_Assessment_Rating_System_STARS+Total_Energy_Consumption_MMBtu_Performance_Year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2671408,
      "name": "John Callewaert+STARS: Total Percentage of Renewable Energy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+STARS_Total_Percentage_of_Renewable_Energy.json",
      "designer": "John Callewaert",
      "title": "STARS: Total Percentage of Renewable Energy",
      "question": "What is the total percentage (%) of energy consumed by the institution that has been generated from renewable sources?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 + m2 + m3 + m4 + m5;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~2642131"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~2642142"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~2642186"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~2671254"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~2642175"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+STARS_Total_Renewable_Energy_Consumed_kWh.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+STARS_Total_Percentage_of_Renewable_Energy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2671427,
      "name": "John Callewaert+STARS: Total Renewable Energy Consumed (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+STARS_Total_Renewable_Energy_Consumed_kWh.json",
      "designer": "John Callewaert",
      "title": "STARS: Total Renewable Energy Consumed (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total amount (kWh) of energy consumed by the institution that has been generated from renewable sources?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  (m1 * 293.29722222 / 100) * m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~2671292"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~2671408"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+STARS_Total_Renewable_Energy_Consumed_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2671444,
      "name": "John Callewaert+HESA: Total Renewable Energy Consumed (kWh)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+HESA_Total_Renewable_Energy_Consumed_kWh.json",
      "designer": "John Callewaert",
      "title": "HESA: Total Renewable Energy Consumed (kWh)",
      "question": "What is the total amount (kWh) of energy consumed by the institution that has been generated from renewable sources?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 + m2 + m3 + m4 + m5 + m6 + m7;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~2554588"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~2554606"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~2554615"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~2554642"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~2554651"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~2554660"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~2555608"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+HESA_Total_Percentage_of_Renewable_Energy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+HESA_Total_Renewable_Energy_Consumed_kWh+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2671461,
      "name": "John Callewaert+HESA: Total Percentage of Renewable Energy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+HESA_Total_Percentage_of_Renewable_Energy.json",
      "designer": "John Callewaert",
      "title": "HESA: Total Percentage of Renewable Energy",
      "question": "What is the total percentage (%) of energy consumed by the institution that has been generated from renewable sources?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~2671444"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~2554471"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+HESA_Total_Percentage_of_Renewable_Energy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2671480,
      "name": "John Callewaert+HESA: Total Amount of Energy (kWh) Consumed per Student",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+HESA_Total_Amount_of_Energy_kWh_Consumed_per_Student.json",
      "designer": "John Callewaert",
      "title": "HESA: Total Amount of Energy (kWh) Consumed per Student",
      "question": "What is the institution’s ratio for total amount of energy (kWh) consumed per student?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~2554471"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~2554309"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+HESA_Total_Amount_of_Energy_kWh_Consumed_per_Student+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2671497,
      "name": "John Callewaert+STARS: Total Amount of Energy (kWh) Consumed per Student",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+STARS_Total_Amount_of_Energy_kWh_Consumed_per_Student.json",
      "designer": "John Callewaert",
      "title": "STARS: Total Amount of Energy (kWh) Consumed per Student",
      "question": "What is the institution’s ratio for total amount of energy (kWh) consumed per student?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 * 293.29722222 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~2671292"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~2642208"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/John_Callewaert+STARS_Total_Amount_of_Energy_kWh_Consumed_per_Student+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2703917,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+ANDINA",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+ANDINA.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "ANDINA",
      "question": "¿Cual es la cantidad de consumo de agua?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+ANDINA+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2704063,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+impacto ambiental",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+impacto_ambiental.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "impacto ambiental",
      "question": "¿Cual es el impacto ambiental de los productos envasado?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+impacto_ambiental+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2704313,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Recycled  Can (kgs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Recycled_Can_kgs.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Recycled  Can (kgs)",
      "question": "How many kgs of cans were recycled in the period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Recycled_Can_kgs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2704349,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Trained people.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Trained_people.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Trained people.",
      "question": "How many people were trained by the company in the period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Trained_people+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2704375,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Returnable Packaging",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Returnable_Packaging.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Returnable Packaging",
      "question": "What percentage of the production was packed in returnable packaging?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Returnable_Packaging+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2704400,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Saving Emissions of Co2 (kgs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Saving_Emissions_of_Co2_kgs.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Saving Emissions of Co2 (kgs)",
      "question": "How many kgs did Co2 emissions decline?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Saving_Emissions_of_Co2_kgs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2704426,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+SENSIVILIZATION ABOUT HIV",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+SENSIVILIZATION_ABOUT_HIV.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "SENSIVILIZATION ABOUT HIV",
      "question": "How many people in the company work on sensitization programs about VIH?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+SENSIVILIZATION_ABOUT_HIV+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2704461,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+POSTOBON EDUCATION",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+POSTOBON_EDUCATION.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "POSTOBON EDUCATION",
      "question": "How many millions of pesos has POSTOBON donated  to education?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+POSTOBON_EDUCATION+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2704528,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Renewable electricity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Renewable_electricity.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Renewable electricity",
      "question": "What is the percentage of renewable energy consumed by the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Renewable_electricity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2704555,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Recyclable packaging",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Recyclable_packaging.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Recyclable packaging",
      "question": "What percentage of the packaging offered by the company are recyclable?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Recyclable_packaging+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2704844,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Planted trees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Planted_trees.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Planted trees",
      "question": "How many trees were planted by the company for this period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Planted_trees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2704925,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Benefit students",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Benefit_students.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Benefit students",
      "question": "How many students has POSTOBON helped ?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Benefit_students+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2704963,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Support for sport",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Support_for_sport.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Support for sport",
      "question": "How many sporties has POSTOBON supported?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Support_for_sport+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2704986,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Sport investment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Sport_investment.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Sport investment",
      "question": "How much has POSTOBON invested in sports ?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Sport_investment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705008,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Generated Employments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Generated_Employments.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Generated Employments",
      "question": "How many employments has POSTOBON generated?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Generated_Employments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705039,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Soccer schools",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Soccer_schools.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Soccer schools",
      "question": "How many children has been benefited by POSTOBON with soccer schools?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Soccer_schools+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705077,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Water to poor people",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Water_to_poor_people.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Water to poor people",
      "question": "How much Water has POSTOBON given to poor people?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Water_to_poor_people+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705234,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Environment - placeholder",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Environment_placeholder.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Environment - placeholder",
      "question": "How does the company help the environment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Environment_placeholder+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705271,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Investment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Investment.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Investment",
      "question": "How much is the Investment in payrolls social and parafiscal benefits per year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Investment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705300,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Money for tolls",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Money_for_tolls.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Money for tolls",
      "question": "How much money was collected by tolls?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Money_for_tolls+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705328,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Benefits to society",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Benefits_to_society.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Benefits to society",
      "question": "How many children and adolescents were benefited by the project Andres and Lucia of the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Benefits_to_society+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705354,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Participation in society",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Participation_in_society.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Participation in society",
      "question": "How has the company participated in society?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "56 million in donations",
        "Support ludic activities",
        "61.1% in the Colombian Market"
      ],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Participation_in_society+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705378,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Inclusion of disabled persons",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Inclusion_of_disabled_persons.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Inclusion of disabled persons",
      "question": "How many disabled people were hired by the company in the period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 7,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Inclusion_of_disabled_persons+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705415,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Spent water for the production of a liter",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Spent_water_for_the_production_of_a_liter.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Spent water for the production of a liter",
      "question": "How much water is spent for the elavoracion of a liter of drink?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Spent_water_for_the_production_of_a_liter+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705487,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Social Impact",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Social_Impact.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Social Impact",
      "question": "How does the company help the society?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Social_Impact+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705509,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Local companies",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Local_companies.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Local companies",
      "question": "What is the contribution of the company with the local suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Local_companies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705531,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Local agreement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Local_agreement.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Local agreement",
      "question": "What is the local commitment of the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Local_agreement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705557,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Environment contribution",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Environment_contribution.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Environment contribution",
      "question": "What are the contributions of the company with the environment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Environment_contribution+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705591,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Human Rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Human_Rights.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Human Rights",
      "question": "What are the human rights of CBC'?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Human_Rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705620,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Labor Rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Labor_Rights.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Labor Rights",
      "question": "What are the labor rights of LAQI",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Labor_Rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705643,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Environent support",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Environent_support.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Environent support",
      "question": "What does LAQI help the environment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Environent_support+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705669,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Anticorruption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Anticorruption.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Anticorruption",
      "question": "How does CBC help to figh the corruption?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Anticorruption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705880,
      "name": "Luis David Quintero+Sector",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Sector.json",
      "designer": "Luis David Quintero",
      "title": "Sector",
      "question": "What is the sector of the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705904,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+SDG 6: Clean water and sanitation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+SDG_6_Clean_water_and_sanitation.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "SDG 6: Clean water and sanitation",
      "question": "Does the organization comply with the SDG 6?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+SDG_6_Clean_water_and_sanitation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705911,
      "name": "Luis David Quintero+Global Compact status",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Global_Compact_status.json",
      "designer": "Luis David Quintero",
      "title": "Global Compact status",
      "question": "What is the status of the company in The UN Global Compact?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Global_Compact_status+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2705997,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+Ownership",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Ownership.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "Ownership",
      "question": "What is the ownership?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Ownership+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2706016,
      "name": "Luis David Quintero+Employee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Employee.json",
      "designer": "Luis David Quintero",
      "title": "Employee",
      "question": "How many employees does the company has?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Employee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2706148,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+Employee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Employee.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "Employee",
      "question": "How many employees does the company has?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 15,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Employee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709262,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+Environmental Fines",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Environmental_Fines.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "Environmental Fines",
      "question": "How much was the company fined (in US dollars) for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Environmental_Fines+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709270,
      "name": "Luis David Quintero+Resicted Bottles",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Resicted_Bottles.json",
      "designer": "Luis David Quintero",
      "title": "Resicted Bottles",
      "question": "How many bottles does the company recycle?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Resicted_Bottles+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709277,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+Environmental Penalty",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Environmental_Penalty.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "Environmental Penalty",
      "question": "How much was the company fined (in US dollars) for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Environmental_Penalty+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709320,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+Reuse (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Reuse.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "Reuse (%)",
      "question": "How much is the percentage of reuse?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Reuse+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709352,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+CO2 emissions in the production of beer",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+CO2_emissions_in_the_production_of_beer.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "CO2 emissions in the production of beer",
      "question": "How many CO2 emissions are there in beer production (Kg CO2 / Hl beer)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+CO2_emissions_in_the_production_of_beer+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709388,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+Carbon emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Carbon_emissions.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "Carbon emissions",
      "question": "What is the percentage of carbon emissions in the beer production?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Carbon_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709424,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+HFC6 Free Covers In The Market (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+HFC6_Free_Covers_In_The_Market.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "HFC6 Free Covers In The Market (%)",
      "question": "How much do you have free HFC6 freezers on the market?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+HFC6_Free_Covers_In_The_Market+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709434,
      "name": "Luis David Quintero+Energy Saving",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Energy_Saving.json",
      "designer": "Luis David Quintero",
      "title": "Energy Saving",
      "question": "How much energy the company saves in terms of households?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Energy_Saving+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709524,
      "name": "Luis David Quintero+Reduction in CO2 emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Reduction_in_CO2_emissions.json",
      "designer": "Luis David Quintero",
      "title": "Reduction in CO2 emissions",
      "question": "How much the company reduced co2 emissions in terms of cars?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Reduction_in_CO2_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709531,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+Watershed Cooperation Plan",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Watershed_Cooperation_Plan.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "Watershed Cooperation Plan",
      "question": "What are the basins that are within this project?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Watershed_Cooperation_Plan+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709601,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+Tons of sugar",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Tons_of_sugar.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "Tons of sugar",
      "question": "How many tons of sugar do you use during the year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Tons_of_sugar+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709612,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+Recycled Bottles Percentage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Recycled_Bottles_Percentage.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "Recycled Bottles Percentage",
      "question": "What is de percentage of recycled bottles?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Recycled_Bottles_Percentage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709656,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+Responsible cultivation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Responsible_cultivation.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "Responsible cultivation",
      "question": "What did they implement to reduce the impact of water erosion?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Responsible_cultivation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709662,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+Energy Consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Energy_Consumption.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "Energy Consumption",
      "question": "How much is the energy consumption per hectolitre of beer produced (MJ / Hl beer)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Energy_Consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709707,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+Hydrocarbon residues",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Hydrocarbon_residues.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "Hydrocarbon residues",
      "question": "What percentage was reduced by the residues derived from hydrocarbons?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Hydrocarbon_residues+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709731,
      "name": "Luis David Quintero+Percentage of reuse in the production of bottles",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Percentage_of_reuse_in_the_production_of_bottles.json",
      "designer": "Luis David Quintero",
      "title": "Percentage of reuse in the production of bottles",
      "question": "How much is the percentage of reuse in the production of bottles?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Percentage_of_reuse_in_the_production_of_bottles+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709738,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+Water Reuse",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Water_Reuse.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "Water Reuse",
      "question": "What is an initiative to take care of water?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Water_Reuse+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709745,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+Alternating energy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Alternating_energy.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "Alternating energy",
      "question": "What percentage of energies come from alternate and renewable sources?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Alternating_energy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709796,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+Environmental policies",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Environmental_policies.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "Environmental policies",
      "question": "What are the main environmental policies?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Environmental_policies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709805,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+Investment in environmental management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Investment_in_environmental_management.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "Investment in environmental management",
      "question": "How much was the investment in environmental management?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Investment_in_environmental_management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709831,
      "name": "Luis David Quintero+POST-INDUSTRIAL USE OF WASTE",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+POST_INDUSTRIAL_USE_OF_WASTE.json",
      "designer": "Luis David Quintero",
      "title": "POST-INDUSTRIAL USE OF WASTE",
      "question": "How much is the percentage of post-industrial use of waste of the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+POST_INDUSTRIAL_USE_OF_WASTE+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709869,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+Waste Managment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Waste_Managment.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "Waste Managment",
      "question": "What are the actions to increase the index of recycled material?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Waste_Managment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709875,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+Waste Management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Waste_Management.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "Waste Management",
      "question": "How many tons of waste per day are recycled?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Waste_Management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709914,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+Conservation and development",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Conservation_and_development.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "Conservation and development",
      "question": "What percentage of gas is replaced by biomass?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Conservation_and_development+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709919,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+Conservation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Conservation.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "Conservation",
      "question": "What percentage of gas is replaced by biomass?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Conservation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709958,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+greenhouse effect",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+greenhouse_effect.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "greenhouse effect",
      "question": "What percentage of greenhouse gas emissions were reduced in 2015?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+greenhouse_effect+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2709964,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+green house effect",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+green_house_effect.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "green house effect",
      "question": "What percentage of greenhouse gas emissions were reduced in 2015?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+green_house_effect+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710003,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+Salinization",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Salinization.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "Salinization",
      "question": "What did they implement to avoid excessive salinization of soils?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Salinization+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710032,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+Responsible Energy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Responsible_Energy.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "Responsible Energy",
      "question": "How they contribute to the responsible use of energy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Responsible_Energy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710081,
      "name": "Luis David Quintero+Water Care Practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Water_Care_Practices.json",
      "designer": "Luis David Quintero",
      "title": "Water Care Practices",
      "question": "Is the company implementing water care practices?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Water_Care_Practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710113,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+Innovation products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Innovation_products.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "Innovation products",
      "question": "What have been the initiatives to have more sustainable packaging?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Innovation_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710119,
      "name": "Jessica Corona+Recycling",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Recycling.json",
      "designer": "Jessica Corona",
      "title": "Recycling",
      "question": "How many liters of vegetable oil have been recycled?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Recycling+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710165,
      "name": "Luis David Quintero+Water consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Water_consumption.json",
      "designer": "Luis David Quintero",
      "title": "Water consumption",
      "question": "How much water does the company consume?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Water_consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710200,
      "name": "Jessica Corona+Recycling water",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Recycling_water.json",
      "designer": "Jessica Corona",
      "title": "Recycling water",
      "question": "How much water does it recycle?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Recycling_water+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710246,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+Waste Management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Waste_Management.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "Waste Management",
      "question": "Which is the system of waste management with which it counts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Waste_Management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710264,
      "name": "Luis David Quintero+CEO Water Mandate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+CEO_Water_Mandate.json",
      "designer": "Luis David Quintero",
      "title": "CEO Water Mandate",
      "question": "What decrease does the water consumption index show per liter of drink?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+CEO_Water_Mandate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710311,
      "name": "Jessica Corona+Toners",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Toners.json",
      "designer": "Jessica Corona",
      "title": "Toners",
      "question": "What are the benefits of toner recycling?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Toners+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710358,
      "name": "Jessica Corona+environmental project",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+environmental_project.json",
      "designer": "Jessica Corona",
      "title": "environmental project",
      "question": "What are the programs implemented to contribute to the health of our planet?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+environmental_project+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710365,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+Light bottles (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Light_bottles.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "Light bottles (%)",
      "question": "What percentage of lightweight bottles are used?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Light_bottles+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710372,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+Renewable sources",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Renewable_sources.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "Renewable sources",
      "question": "Which is the percentage of the energy that comes from renewable sources?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Renewable_sources+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710413,
      "name": "Luis David Quintero+Water resource care initiatives",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Water_resource_care_initiatives.json",
      "designer": "Luis David Quintero",
      "title": "Water resource care initiatives",
      "question": "which are the water resorce care initiatives of the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Water_resource_care_initiatives+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710435,
      "name": "Jessica Corona+Christmas Campaign",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Christmas_Campaign.json",
      "designer": "Jessica Corona",
      "title": "Christmas Campaign",
      "question": "What was the result of the Christmas tree activity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Christmas_Campaign+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710463,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+Carbon footprint",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Carbon_footprint.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "Carbon footprint",
      "question": "What is the percentage of the company's carbon footprint?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Carbon_footprint+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710497,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+Energy Practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Energy_Practices.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "Energy Practices",
      "question": "What are the practices they have developed for the correct use of energy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Energy_Practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710541,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+greenhouse gases",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+greenhouse_gases.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "greenhouse gases",
      "question": "In which year they began measuring their greenhouse gas emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+greenhouse_gases+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710545,
      "name": "Jessica Corona+Awareness programs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Awareness_programs.json",
      "designer": "Jessica Corona",
      "title": "Awareness programs",
      "question": "What awareness programs does Toks group develop?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Awareness_programs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710576,
      "name": "Jessica Corona+Certifications",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Certifications.json",
      "designer": "Jessica Corona",
      "title": "Certifications",
      "question": "What was the certification they achieved in their restaurants?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Certifications+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710615,
      "name": "Jessica Corona+Technological programs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Technological_programs.json",
      "designer": "Jessica Corona",
      "title": "Technological programs",
      "question": "What technological programs have they developed?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Technological_programs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710662,
      "name": "Jessica Corona+Solar panels",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Solar_panels.json",
      "designer": "Jessica Corona",
      "title": "Solar panels",
      "question": "WHAT WAS THE RESULT OF THE SOLAR PANELS PROGRAM?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Solar_panels+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710669,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+Electrical consumtion (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Electrical_consumtion.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "Electrical consumtion (%)",
      "question": "How much is consumed in electricity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Electrical_consumtion+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710724,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+Environmental Investment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Environmental_Investment.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "Environmental Investment",
      "question": "What has been the investment in actions in favor of the environment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Environmental_Investment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710731,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+Drip irrigation (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Drip_irrigation.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "Drip irrigation (%)",
      "question": "What percentage of vineyards use the drip irrigation system?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Drip_irrigation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710769,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+Tonnes of waste (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Tonnes_of_waste.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "Tonnes of waste (%)",
      "question": "What percentage of tons of waste does the company have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Tonnes_of_waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710820,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+Native forest",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Native_forest.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "Native forest",
      "question": "How many hectares of native forest does the company have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Native_forest+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710846,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+Efficient industry",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Efficient_industry.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "Efficient industry",
      "question": "What is the percentage of reduction of consumption of gas and electric energy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Efficient_industry+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710886,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+Renewable energy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Renewable_energy.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "Renewable energy",
      "question": "What percentage of electric energy comes from renewable energy sources?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Renewable_energy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710922,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+Plastic waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Plastic_waste.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "Plastic waste",
      "question": "How many tons of plastic waste could be saved by lowering the weight of the bottles of milk bottles?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Plastic_waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710949,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+Water Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Water_Actions.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "Water Actions",
      "question": "What have been its actions to reduce water consumption?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Water_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710956,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+carbon",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+carbon.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "carbon",
      "question": "In what percentage was the corporate carbon footprint reduced?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+carbon+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710966,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+SDG6: Clean Water and Sanitation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+SDG6_Clean_Water_and_Sanitation.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "SDG6: Clean Water and Sanitation",
      "question": "Does this company implement the SDG6: Clean water and sanitation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": "",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Business Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+SDG6_Clean_Water_and_Sanitation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2710999,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+SDG12_Responsible_Consumption_and_Production.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
      "question": "Does this company implement the SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 15,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+SDG12_Responsible_Consumption_and_Production+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711021,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+SDG13: Climate Action",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+SDG13_Climate_Action.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "SDG13: Climate Action",
      "question": "Does this company implement the SDG13: Climate Action?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 13,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 11,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+SDG13_Climate_Action+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711028,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+Verification Processes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Verification_Processes.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "Verification Processes",
      "question": "How they carry out their environmental verification processes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Verification_Processes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711047,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+Plan",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Plan.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "Plan",
      "question": "What projects have they implemented to respect the environment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Plan+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711053,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+SDG15: Life on Land",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+SDG15_Life_on_Land.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "SDG15: Life on Land",
      "question": "Does this company implement the SDG15: Life on Land?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+SDG15_Life_on_Land+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711130,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+Energy Consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Energy_Consumption.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "Energy Consumption",
      "question": "How much did the company consume in energy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Energy_Consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711137,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+responsible consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+responsible_consumption.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "responsible consumption",
      "question": "Since 2010 what has been the reduction of water consumption?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+responsible_consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711172,
      "name": "Luis David Quintero+Recycling policies for employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Recycling_policies_for_employees.json",
      "designer": "Luis David Quintero",
      "title": "Recycling policies for employees",
      "question": "What are the recycling policies for employees of the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Recycling_policies_for_employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711204,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+saving",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+saving.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "saving",
      "question": "¿cuanto dinero han ahorrado en el consumo de energia electrica?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+saving+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711242,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+initiative",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+initiative.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "initiative",
      "question": "What is the goal of Forefront Climate Change Cluster?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+initiative+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711265,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+Support for biodiversity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Support_for_biodiversity.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "Support for biodiversity",
      "question": "How they support the care of biodiversity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Support_for_biodiversity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711272,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+reduction",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+reduction.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "reduction",
      "question": "What is the percentage of reduction of emissions of Co2?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+reduction+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711345,
      "name": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas+Ecostars",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Ecostars.json",
      "designer": "Aidee Guadalupe Garcia Rosas",
      "title": "Ecostars",
      "question": "What is the guarantee of the program Ecostar?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aidee_Guadalupe_Garcia_Rosas+Ecostars+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711367,
      "name": "Kelly Ramirez+Environmental Impact",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Environmental_Impact.json",
      "designer": "Kelly Ramirez",
      "title": "Environmental Impact",
      "question": "Does this company implement policies to mitigate its environmental impact?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 13,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Kelly_Ramirez+Environmental_Impact+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711391,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+Reforestation actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Reforestation_actions.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "Reforestation actions",
      "question": "What are the actions carried out by the campaign “Laguna yo te quiero verde” in which they participate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Reforestation_actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711401,
      "name": "Luis David Quintero+Coffee waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Coffee_waste.json",
      "designer": "Luis David Quintero",
      "title": "Coffee waste",
      "question": "What is the percentage of use of the coffee waste of the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Coffee_waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711417,
      "name": "Jessica Corona+Water consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Water_consumption.json",
      "designer": "Jessica Corona",
      "title": "Water consumption",
      "question": "How much water does your company consume?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Water_consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711512,
      "name": "Jessica Corona+Improving the landscape",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Improving_the_landscape.json",
      "designer": "Jessica Corona",
      "title": "Improving the landscape",
      "question": "What is the Landscape Improvement Project?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Improving_the_landscape+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711572,
      "name": "Jessica Corona+Waste Management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Waste_Management.json",
      "designer": "Jessica Corona",
      "title": "Waste Management",
      "question": "What has GrupoPeñaflor implemented to reduce the impact of waste?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Waste_Management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711600,
      "name": "Luis David Quintero+Investigation Project",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Investigation_Project.json",
      "designer": "Luis David Quintero",
      "title": "Investigation Project",
      "question": "Does the company lead a research project to mitigate its environmental impact?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Investigation_Project+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711635,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+Diesel consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Diesel_consumption.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "Diesel consumption",
      "question": "What was the percentage of decrease in diesel consumption between 2013 and 2014?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Diesel_consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711684,
      "name": "Jessica Corona+Water amount",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Water_amount.json",
      "designer": "Jessica Corona",
      "title": "Water amount",
      "question": "How much water was reduced from 2015 to 2016?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Water_amount+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711706,
      "name": "Jessica Corona+Recycled waste (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Recycled_waste.json",
      "designer": "Jessica Corona",
      "title": "Recycled waste (%)",
      "question": "What percentage of waste is reused in 2016?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Recycled_waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711807,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+water treatment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+water_treatment.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "water treatment",
      "question": "Which has been the percentage increase in the amount of water used by specialized treatment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+water_treatment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711825,
      "name": "Jessica Corona+PRODUCTS",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+PRODUCTS.json",
      "designer": "Jessica Corona",
      "title": "PRODUCTS",
      "question": "What certification did you obtain for your products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+PRODUCTS+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711851,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Chocolate Ibarra Training",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Chocolate_Ibarra_Training.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Chocolate Ibarra Training",
      "question": "How many hours did Chocolate Ibarra spend on training in human rights and safety and health? \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Chocolate_Ibarra_Training+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711875,
      "name": "Jessica Corona+Carbon footprint",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Carbon_footprint.json",
      "designer": "Jessica Corona",
      "title": "Carbon footprint",
      "question": "What is the carbon footprint?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+Carbon_footprint+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711893,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+Recycled waste (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Recycled_waste.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "Recycled waste (%)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of recycled waste?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Recycled_waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711899,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Marketing",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Marketing.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Marketing",
      "question": "What are the communication channels of the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Marketing+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2711960,
      "name": "Jessica Corona+ENVIRONMENTAL PRINCIPLES",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+ENVIRONMENTAL_PRINCIPLES.json",
      "designer": "Jessica Corona",
      "title": "ENVIRONMENTAL PRINCIPLES",
      "question": "What are the pillars of the principles for Grupo Peñaflor?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jessica_Corona+ENVIRONMENTAL_PRINCIPLES+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2712033,
      "name": "Luis David Quintero+Environmental sustainability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Environmental_sustainability.json",
      "designer": "Luis David Quintero",
      "title": "Environmental sustainability",
      "question": "Which processes that drive environmental sustainability leads the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Luis_David_Quintero+Environmental_sustainability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2712039,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Training and Education",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Training_and_Education.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Training and Education",
      "question": "How many hours did Chocolate Ibarra spend on training in human rights and safety and health? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Training_and_Education+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2712060,
      "name": "brenda amezquita licea+Consumer savings",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Consumer_savings.json",
      "designer": "brenda amezquita licea",
      "title": "Consumer savings",
      "question": "Which is the result of savings in gasoline, diesel and gas consumption in the distribution fleet?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/brenda_amezquita_licea+Consumer_savings+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2712067,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+HEALTH",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+HEALTH.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "HEALTH",
      "question": "How does Group Chocolate Ibarra contribute to health?\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+HEALTH+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2712132,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+EXPORTS IN THE COMPANY",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+EXPORTS_IN_THE_COMPANY.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "EXPORTS IN THE COMPANY",
      "question": "What countries does Group Ibarra chocolate export their products to?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "US, Honduras, Spain and Nicaragua"
      ],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+EXPORTS_IN_THE_COMPANY+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2712210,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Education in Chocolate Ibarra",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Education_in_Chocolate_Ibarra.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Education in Chocolate Ibarra",
      "question": "How many hours did Chocolate Ibarra spend on training in human rights and safety and health?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Education_in_Chocolate_Ibarra+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2712264,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Comunication",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Comunication.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Comunication",
      "question": "What are the communication channels of the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Comunication+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2712417,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Visits",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Visits.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Visits",
      "question": "How many visits does Chocolate Ibarra  receive per year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Visits+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2712506,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Employee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Employee.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Employee",
      "question": "How many employees does the company have?\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Employee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2712564,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+influence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+influence.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "influence",
      "question": "How does the company positively influence society?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+influence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2712686,
      "name": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Influence on the environment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Influence_on_the_environment.json",
      "designer": "JULIANBOTEROVELEZ",
      "title": "Influence on the environment",
      "question": "How does the Chocolate Ibarra Group participate in environmental improvement? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/JULIANBOTEROVELEZ+Influence_on_the_environment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2718963,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Marketing-related incidents of non-compliance resulting in a fine, GRI 417-3 (formerly G4-PR7)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Marketing_related_incidents_of_non_compliance_resulting_in_a_fine_GRI_417_3_formerly_G4_PR7.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Marketing-related incidents of non-compliance resulting in a fine, GRI 417-3 (formerly G4-PR7)",
      "question": "What is the total number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations concerning marketing communications, including advertising, promotion, and sponsorship, resulting in a fine or penalty?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090325\">GRI 417</a> addresses the topic of product and service information and labeling and marketing communications. This includes customer access to accurate and adequate information on the positive and negative economic, environmental, and social impacts of the products and services they consume – both from a product and service labeling and a marketing communications perspective. </p>\r\n<p>Fair and responsible marketing communications, as well as access to information about the composition of products, and their proper use and disposal, can help customers to make informed choices. </p>\r\n<p>The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to product and service labeling and marketing communications, and how it manages these impacts.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-PR7 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 417-3 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Marketing_related_incidents_of_non_compliance_fined_G4_PR7_a1_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify the number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations concerning marketing communications resulting in a fine or penalty for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords and search terms for this metric</strong></p>\r\n<p>- Fine</p>\r\n<p>- Non-compliance</p>\r\n<p>- 417-3</p>\r\n<p>- GRI</p>\r\n<p>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong></p>\r\n<p>If the company reports that there have been no marketing-related incidents of non-compliance resulting in a fine enter the answer as '0'. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 417 - Marketing and Labeling",
        "GRI Standards+417-3 Incidents of non-compliance concerning marketing communications"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 46,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Marketing_related_incidents_of_non_compliance_resulting_in_a_fine_GRI_417_3_formerly_G4_PR7+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2719115,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Marketing-related incidents of non-compliance resulting in a warning, GRI 417-3 (formerly G4-PR7)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Marketing_related_incidents_of_non_compliance_resulting_in_a_warning_GRI_417_3_formerly_G4_PR7.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Marketing-related incidents of non-compliance resulting in a warning, GRI 417-3 (formerly G4-PR7)",
      "question": "What is the total number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations concerning marketing communications, including advertising, promotion, and sponsorship resulting in a warning?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090325\">GRI 417</a> addresses the topic of product and service information and labeling and marketing communications. This includes customer access to accurate and adequate information on the positive and negative economic, environmental, and social impacts of the products and services they consume – both from a product and service labeling and a marketing communications perspective. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Fair and responsible marketing communications, as well as access to information about the composition of products, and their proper use and disposal, can help customers to make informed choices. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to product and service labeling and marketing communications, and how it manages these impacts.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-PR7 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 417-3 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Marketing_related_incidents_of_non_compliance_warning_G4_PR7_a2_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify the number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations concerning marketing communications resulting in a warning for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords and search terms for this metric</strong></p>\r\n<p>- Warning</p>\r\n<p>- Non-compliance</p>\r\n<p>- 417-3</p>\r\n<p>- GRI</p>\r\n<p>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong></p>\r\n<p>If the company reports that there have been no marketing-related incidents of non-compliance resulting in a warning enter the answer as '0'. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 417 - Marketing and Labeling",
        "GRI Standards+417-3 Incidents of non-compliance concerning marketing communications",
        "GRI Standards+417-3-a Incidents of non-compliance with marketing communications regulations and codes"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 30,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 30,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Marketing_related_incidents_of_non_compliance_resulting_in_a_warning_GRI_417_3_formerly_G4_PR7+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2719148,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Marketing-related incidents of non-compliance with voluntary codes, GRI 417-3 (formerly G4-PR7)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Marketing_related_incidents_of_non_compliance_with_voluntary_codes_GRI_417_3_formerly_G4_PR7.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Marketing-related incidents of non-compliance with voluntary codes, GRI 417-3 (formerly G4-PR7)",
      "question": "What is the total number of incidents of non-compliance with voluntary codes concerning marketing communications, including advertising, promotion, and sponsorship?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090325\">GRI 417</a> addresses the topic of product and service information and labeling and marketing communications. This includes customer access to accurate and adequate information on the positive and negative economic, environmental, and social impacts of the products and services they consume – both from a product and service labeling and a marketing communications perspective. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Fair and responsible marketing communications, as well as access to information about the composition of products, and their proper use and disposal, can help customers to make informed choices. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to product and service labeling and marketing communications, and how it manages these impacts.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-PR7 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 417-3 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Marketing_related_incidents_of_non_compliance_voluntary_codes_G4_PR7_a3_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify the number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations concerning marketing communications for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords and search terms for this metric</strong></p>\r\n<p>- Fine</p>\r\n<p>- Non-compliance</p>\r\n<p>- 417-3</p>\r\n<p>- GRI</p>\r\n<p>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong></p>\r\n<p>If the company reports that there have been no marketing-related incidents of non-compliance enter the answer as '0'. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 417 - Marketing and Labeling",
        "GRI Standards+417-3 Incidents of non-compliance concerning marketing communications",
        "GRI Standards+417-3-a Incidents of non-compliance with marketing communications regulations and codes"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Marketing_related_incidents_of_non_compliance_with_voluntary_codes_GRI_417_3_formerly_G4_PR7+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2719180,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Complaints concerning breaches of customer privacy from outside parties, GRI 418-1-a (formerly G4-PR8-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Complaints_concerning_breaches_of_customer_privacy_from_outside_parties_GRI_418_1_a_formerly_G4_PR8_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Complaints concerning breaches of customer privacy from outside parties, GRI 418-1-a (formerly G4-PR8-a)",
      "question": "What is the total number of substantiated complaints received concerning breaches of customer privacy received from outside parties by the organization?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090326\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 418</a> addresses the topic of customer privacy, including losses of customer data and breaches of customer privacy. These can result from non-compliance with existing laws, regulations and/or other voluntary standards regarding the protection of customer privacy. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To protect customer privacy, an organization is expected to limit its collection of personal data, to collect data by lawful means, and to be transparent about how data are gathered, used, and secured. The organization is also expected to not disclose or use personal customer information for any purposes other than those agreed upon, and to communicate any changes in data protection policies or measures to customers directly.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to customer privacy, and how it manages them.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-PR8 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 418-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Outside_party_complaints_concerning_breaches_of_customer_privacy_G4_PR8_a1_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the number of complaints concerning breaches of customer privacy from outside parties received by an organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Privacy</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Complaint</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- 418-1</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 418 - Customer Privacy",
        "GRI Standards+418-1 Substantiated complaints concerning breaches of customer privacy and losses of customer data",
        "GRI Standards+418-1-a Substantiated complaints regarding breaches of customer privacy, by category"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 27,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 27,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Complaints_concerning_breaches_of_customer_privacy_from_outside_parties_GRI_418_1_a_formerly_G4_PR8_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2719205,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Complaints concerning breaches of customer privacy from regulatory bodies, GRI 418-1-a (formerly G4-PR8-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Complaints_concerning_breaches_of_customer_privacy_from_regulatory_bodies_GRI_418_1_a_formerly_G4_PR8_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Complaints concerning breaches of customer privacy from regulatory bodies, GRI 418-1-a (formerly G4-PR8-a)",
      "question": "What is the total number of substantiated complaints received from regulatory bodies concerning breaches of customer privacy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090326\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 418</a> addresses the topic of customer privacy, including losses of customer data and breaches of customer privacy. These can result from non-compliance with existing laws, regulations and/or other voluntary standards regarding the protection of customer privacy. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To protect customer privacy, an organization is expected to limit its collection of personal data, to collect data by lawful means, and to be transparent about how data are gathered, used, and secured. The organization is also expected to not disclose or use personal customer information for any purposes other than those agreed upon, and to communicate any changes in data protection policies or measures to customers directly.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to customer privacy, and how it manages them.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-PR8 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 418-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Complaints_concerning_breaches_of_customer_privacy_from_regulatory_bodies_G4_PR8_a2_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify the number of complaints concerning breaches of customer privacy from regulatory bodies received by an organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords and search terms for this metric</strong></p>\r\n<p>- Privacy</p>\r\n<p>- Complaint</p>\r\n<p>- 418-1</p>\r\n<p>- GRI</p>\r\n<p>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong></p>\r\n<p>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Complaints",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 418 - Customer Privacy",
        "GRI Standards+418-1 Substantiated complaints concerning breaches of customer privacy and losses of customer data",
        "GRI Standards+418-1-a Substantiated complaints regarding breaches of customer privacy, by category"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 23,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 23,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Complaints_concerning_breaches_of_customer_privacy_from_regulatory_bodies_GRI_418_1_a_formerly_G4_PR8_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2719248,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Customer data leaks, thefts and losses, GRI 418-1-b (formerly G4-PR8-b)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Customer_data_leaks_thefts_and_losses_GRI_418_1_b_formerly_G4_PR8_b.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Customer data leaks, thefts and losses, GRI 418-1-b (formerly G4-PR8-b)",
      "question": "What is the total number of identified leaks, thefts, or losses of customer data?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090326\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 418</a> addresses the topic of customer privacy, including losses of customer data and breaches of customer privacy. These can result from non-compliance with existing laws, regulations and/or other voluntary standards regarding the protection of customer privacy. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To protect customer privacy, an organization is expected to limit its collection of personal data, to collect data by lawful means, and to be transparent about how data are gathered, used, and secured. The organization is also expected to not disclose or use personal customer information for any purposes other than those agreed upon, and to communicate any changes in data protection policies or measures to customers directly.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to customer privacy, and how it manages them.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-PR8 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 418-1 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Customer_data_leaks_thefts_losses_G4_PR8_b_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify the total number of identified leaks, thefts, or losses of customer data from the organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p>- Leak</p>\r\n<p>- Theft</p>\r\n<p>- Data loss</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- 418-1</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>If the company reports their customer data leaks, thefts or losses separately, you will need to add the totals together. <strong>If the company reports that there have been no data leaks, thefts or losses enter the answer as '0'</strong>. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 418 - Customer Privacy",
        "GRI Standards+418-1 Substantiated complaints concerning breaches of customer privacy and losses of customer data"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Customer_data_leaks_thefts_and_losses_GRI_418_1_b_formerly_G4_PR8_b+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2719336,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Fines for products and services non-compliance (G4-PR9-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Fines_for_products_and_services_non_compliance_G4_PR9_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Fines for products and services non-compliance (G4-PR9-a)",
      "question": "What is the total monetary value of significant fines for non-compliance with laws and regulations concerning the provision and use of products and services?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/product-responsibility/compliance/Pages/G4-PR9.aspx|G4-PR9]] - 'Total monetary value of significant fines for non-compliance with laws and regulations concerning the provision and use of products and services'.</p><p>​Customer satisfaction is one measure of an organization’s sensitivity to its customers’ needs and preferences and, from an organizational perspective, is essential for long-term success. In the context of sustainability, customer satisfaction provides insight into how the organization approaches its relationship with one stakeholder group (customers). It may also be used in combination with other sustainability measures.<br><br>Customers’ needs and preferences may differ by gender and other diversity factors. Customer satisfaction may provide insights into the degree to which an organization considers the needs of other stakeholders.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>This metric is looking for the total monetary value of significant fines for non-compliance with laws and regulations concerning the provision and use of products and services.</strong></p><p>For Wikirate researchers:</p><ul><li><p>Identify administrative or judicial sanctions levied against the organization for failure to comply with laws and regulations, including international declarations, conventions and treaties, and national, sub-national, regional, and local regulations concerning the provision and use of the organization’s products and services. Relevant information for this Indicator includes data from [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/product-responsibility/customer-health-and-safety/Pages/G4-PR2.aspx|G4-PR2]], [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/product-responsibility/product-and-service-labeling/Pages/G4-PR4.aspx|G4-PR4]], and [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/product-responsibility/marketing-communications/Pages/G4-PR7.aspx|G4-PR7]].</p></li><li><p><strong>If no significant fines for non-compliance with laws and regulations concerning the provision and use of products and services have been noted, please add “0” as the answer </strong>and include a brief statement of this fact as a comment to the value. If the company does not report this Indicator, submit the answer as “Unknown”.</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 416 - Customer Health and Safety",
        "GRI Standards+416-2 Incidents of non-compliance concerning the health and safety impacts of products and services",
        "GRI Standards+416-2-a Incidents of non-compliance related to product and service health and safety",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+S4 - Consumers and End-users",
        "ESRS Standards+S4.3 - Actions and resources related to consumers and end-users"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 26,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 26,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Fines_for_products_and_services_non_compliance_G4_PR9_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2719409,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Customer satisfaction survey results reported for organization (G4-PR5-a1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Customer_satisfaction_survey_results_reported_for_organization_G4_PR5_a1.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Customer satisfaction survey results reported for organization (G4-PR5-a1)",
      "question": "Does the organization report the results or key conclusions of customer satisfaction surveys (based on statistically relevant sample sizes) conducted in the reporting period relating to information about the organization as a whole?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/product-responsibility/compliance/Pages/G4-PR9.aspx|G4-PR5]] - 'Results of surveys measuring customer satisfaction for the organization as a whole'.</p><p>Customer satisfaction is one measure of an organization’s sensitivity to its customers’ needs and preferences and, from an organizational perspective, is essential for long-term success. In the context of sustainability, customer satisfaction provides insight into how the organization approaches its relationship with one stakeholder group (customers). It may also be used in combination with other sustainability measures.<br><br>Customers’ needs and preferences may differ by gender and other diversity factors. Customer satisfaction may provide insights into the degree to which an organization considers the needs of other stakeholders.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>This metric is looking for reporting on the results of surveys measuring customer satisfaction for the organization as a whole.</strong></p><p>For Wikirate researchers:</p><ul><li><p>Identify whether the company reports results of surveys measuring customer satisfaction for the organization as a whole.</p></li><li><p>For any survey results reported, identify the product or service category, or locations of operations to which they apply, and note these in the comments.</p></li><li><p>If the company reports results or key conclusions of customer satisfaction surveys about the organization as a whole, answer <strong>Yes</strong>.</p></li><li><p>If the company doesn’t report the results, answer <strong>No</strong>. </p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 42,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 30,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Customer_satisfaction_survey_results_reported_for_organization_G4_PR5_a1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2719441,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Customer satisfaction survey results reported for major product or service (G4-PR5-a2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Customer_satisfaction_survey_results_reported_for_major_product_or_service_G4_PR5_a2.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Customer satisfaction survey results reported for major product or service (G4-PR5-a2)",
      "question": "Does the organization report the results or key conclusions of customer satisfaction surveys (based on statistically relevant sample sizes) conducted in the reporting period relating to information about a major product or service category?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/product-responsibility/compliance/Pages/G4-PR9.aspx|G4-PR5]] - 'Results of surveys measuring customer satisfaction about a major product or service category'.</p><p>Customer satisfaction is one measure of an organization’s sensitivity to its customers’ needs and preferences and, from an organizational perspective, is essential for long-term success. In the context of sustainability, customer satisfaction provides insight into how the organization approaches its relationship with one stakeholder group (customers). It may also be used in combination with other sustainability measures.<br><br>Customers’ needs and preferences may differ by gender and other diversity factors. Customer satisfaction may provide insights into the degree to which an organization considers the needs of other stakeholders.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>This metric is looking for reporting on the results of surveys measuring customer satisfaction about a major product or service category.</strong></p><p>For Wikirate researchers:</p><ul><li><p>Identify whether the company reports results of surveys measuring customer satisfaction about a major product or service category.</p></li><li><p>For any survey results reported, identify the product or service category, or locations of operations to which they apply, and note these in the comments.</p></li><li><p>If the company reports results or key conclusions of customer satisfaction surveys about major product or service category, answer <strong>Yes</strong>.</p></li><li><p>If the company doesn’t report the results, answer <strong>No</strong>. </p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 38,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Customer_satisfaction_survey_results_reported_for_major_product_or_service_G4_PR5_a2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2719451,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Customer satisfaction survey results reported for locations of operation (G4-PR5-a3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Customer_satisfaction_survey_results_reported_for_locations_of_operation_G4_PR5_a3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Customer satisfaction survey results reported for locations of operation (G4-PR5-a3)",
      "question": "Does the organization report the results or key conclusions of customer satisfaction surveys (based on statistically relevant sample sizes) conducted in the reporting period relating to information about significant locations of operation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines. It covers one of the requirements of Indicator [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/product-responsibility/compliance/Pages/G4-PR9.aspx|G4-PR5]] - 'Results of surveys measuring customer satisfaction about significant locations of operation'.</p><p>Customer satisfaction is one measure of an organization’s sensitivity to its customers’ needs and preferences and, from an organizational perspective, is essential for long-term success. In the context of sustainability, customer satisfaction provides insight into how the organization approaches its relationship with one stakeholder group (customers). It may also be used in combination with other sustainability measures.<br><br>Customers’ needs and preferences may differ by gender and other diversity factors. Customer satisfaction may provide insights into the degree to which an organization considers the needs of other stakeholders.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>This metric is looking for reporting on the results of surveys measuring customer satisfaction about significant locations of operation.</strong></p><p>For Wikirate researchers:</p><ul><li><p>Identify whether the company reports results of surveys measuring customer satisfaction about significant locations of operation.</p></li><li><p>For any survey results reported, identify the product or service category, or locations of operations to which they apply, and note these in the comments.</p></li><li><p>If the company reports results or key conclusions of customer satisfaction surveys relating to information about significant locations of operation, answer&nbsp;<strong>Yes</strong>.</p></li><li><p>If the company doesn’t report the results, answer&nbsp;<strong>No</strong>.</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 36,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 27,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Customer_satisfaction_survey_results_reported_for_locations_of_operation_G4_PR5_a3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2719473,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Product and service information/labeling incidents of non-compliance resulting in a fine, GRI 417-2 (formerly G4-PR4)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Product_and_service_information_labeling_incidents_of_non_compliance_resulting_in_a_fine_GRI_417_2_formerly_G4_PR4.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Product and service information/labeling incidents of non-compliance resulting in a fine, GRI 417-2 (formerly G4-PR4)",
      "question": "What is the total number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations concerning product and service information and labeling resulting in a fine or penalty?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090325\">GRI 417</a> addresses the topic of product and service information and labeling and marketing communications. This includes customer access to accurate and adequate information on the positive and negative economic, environmental, and social impacts of the products and services they consume – both from a product and service labeling and a marketing communications perspective. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Fair and responsible marketing communications, as well as access to information about the composition of products, and their proper use and disposal, can help customers to make informed choices. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-PR4 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 417-2 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Product_and_service_and_labeling_incidents_of_non_compliance_fined_G4_PR4_a1_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations concerning product and service information and labeling for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Fine</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Non-compliance</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- 417-2</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company reports that there have been no incidents of non-compliance resulting in a fine enter the answer as '0'. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Incidents",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 27,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 27,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Product_and_service_information_labeling_incidents_of_non_compliance_resulting_in_a_fine_GRI_417_2_formerly_G4_PR4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2719506,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Product and service information/labeling incidents of non-compliance resulting in a warning, GRI 417-2 (formerly G4-PR4)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Product_and_service_information_labeling_incidents_of_non_compliance_resulting_in_a_warning_GRI_417_2_formerly_G4_PR4.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Product and service information/labeling incidents of non-compliance resulting in a warning, GRI 417-2 (formerly G4-PR4)",
      "question": "What is the total number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations concerning product and service information and labeling resulting in a warning?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090325\">GRI 417</a> addresses the topic of product and service information and labeling and marketing communications. This includes customer access to accurate and adequate information on the positive and negative economic, environmental, and social impacts of the products and services they consume – both from a product and service labeling and a marketing communications perspective. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Fair and responsible marketing communications, as well as access to information about the composition of products, and their proper use and disposal, can help customers to make informed choices. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-PR4 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 417-2 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Product_and_service_and_labeling_incidents_of_non_compliance_warning_G4_PR4_a2_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations concerning product and service information and labeling resulting in a warning for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Warning</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Non-compliance</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- 417-2</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company reports that there have been no incidents of non-compliance resulting in a warning enter the answer as '0'. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Incidents",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 25,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 25,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Product_and_service_information_labeling_incidents_of_non_compliance_resulting_in_a_warning_GRI_417_2_formerly_G4_PR4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2719516,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Product and service information/labeling incidents of non-compliance with voluntary codes, GRI 417-2 (formerly G4-PR4)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Product_and_service_information_labeling_incidents_of_non_compliance_with_voluntary_codes_GRI_417_2_formerly_G4_PR4.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Product and service information/labeling incidents of non-compliance with voluntary codes, GRI 417-2 (formerly G4-PR4)",
      "question": "What is the total number of incidents of non-compliance with voluntary codes concerning product and service information and labeling?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090325\">GRI 417</a> addresses the topic of product and service information and labeling and marketing communications. This includes customer access to accurate and adequate information on the positive and negative economic, environmental, and social impacts of the products and services they consume – both from a product and service labeling and a marketing communications perspective. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Fair and responsible marketing communications, as well as access to information about the composition of products, and their proper use and disposal, can help customers to make informed choices. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In 2018, the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines were superseded by the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI standards). For this metric, the code G4-PR4 is used in company reporting prior to 2018, and the new GRI 417-2 code used in reporting from 2018 onwards. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric can be found </span><a href=\"/Product_and_service_and_labeling_Incidents_of_non_compliance_to_voluntary_codes_G4_PR4_a3_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations concerning product and service information and labeling for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Voluntary code</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Non-compliance</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- 417-2</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company reports that there have been no incidents of non-compliance with voluntary codes enter the answer as '0'. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Incidents",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 417 - Marketing and Labeling",
        "GRI Standards+417-2 Incidents of non-compliance concerning product and service information and labeling",
        "GRI Standards+417-2-b Brief statement that the organization has not identified any non-compliance with regulations and/or voluntary codes, if applicable"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Product_and_service_information_labeling_incidents_of_non_compliance_with_voluntary_codes_GRI_417_2_formerly_G4_PR4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2722057,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA policy (revised)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_policy_revised.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA policy (revised)",
      "question": "Does the company’s statement detail one or more specific, organisational policies or actions to combat slavery in their direct (tier 1) and/or in-direct (beyond tier 1) supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Establishing effective policies to combat modern slavery is listed as one potential component of a modern slavery statement within the UK Modern Slavery Act and is recommended by the Home Office guidance accompanying it. Clear organisational policies help to set the tone in assessing, preventing and mitigating the risk of, and working to influence and remedy, modern slavery in organisations and their own operations and supply chains. It also helps to demonstrate a company’s commitment to tackling modern slavery.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>For further information on policies use the [[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf|Home Office Guidance, pp. 28-30]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Does the company’s statement detail <strong>clear, organisational modern slavery</strong> policies that apply to their <strong>direct </strong>and/or <strong>beyond tier 1</strong> supply chain? These policies must be explicit and go beyond vague statements of intended actions. </p>\r\n<p>Direct supply chains can also be referred to as tier 1 supply chains and beyond tier 1 includes all players of the supply chain that are not directly tied to the company.</p>\r\n<p>Policies can include:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>requiring all suppliers and contractors to comply with local and international laws (including the UN Guiding Principles, ILO standards, or International Conventions), and company’s policies,</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>prohibiting contractors or suppliers from using modern slavery, forced labour, involuntary labour, debt bondage or human trafficking,</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>prohibiting contractors or suppliers from using child labour,</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>including clauses on forced labour in Codes of Conduct or Supplier Codes,</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>requiring contracts to include clauses on forced labour in supply chains,</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>requiring all suppliers and contractors to respect labour rights more generally, such as paying living wages, or allowing freedom of association,</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>prohibiting all suppliers and contractors to charge employees fees as part of their recruitment,</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>requiring all suppliers and contractors to provide additional protection for migrant workers, or</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>requiring suppliers to produce their own statement on modern slavery and forced labour.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p><strong>Please note this metric refers to organisational policies that are clear and explicitly tackle and prevent modern slavery. </strong>It does not measure supplier engagement such as supplier audits, questionnaires, site visits, etc., this is measured by the metrics: 'MSA risk assessment' and ‘MSA risk management’<br><br><strong>Please select as many policies as apply.</strong> Distinguish whether these policies adhere to <em>“direct”</em> or <em>“Tier 1”</em> suppliers or <em>“Tier 2”</em> or <em>“beyond Tier 1”</em> or <em>“in-direct”</em> suppliers. <strong>If it is not specifically mentioned which supply chain tiers these policies apply to, please assume they cover direct suppliers only. </strong></p>\r\n<p>For example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\"all suppliers\" = direct / tier 1</li>\r\n<li>\"subcontractors\" = beyond tier 1</li>\r\n<li>\"monitoring tier suppliers 2 for compliance\" = beyond tier 1</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>If no such policy exists, then please select <strong>“No”</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>If the business indicates it is developing a modern slavery supply chain policy or is planning to implement one in the future, please indicate <strong>“In Development”</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>For each value, please include a comment that copies relevant information from the statement and page numbers of where you found the information in the statement. If the policy that you wish to include is not listed among the possible metric answers, please add a comment and flag the section for review.</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for “Suppliers comply with laws and company’s policies”, “Prohibit use of forced labour”, \"Prohibit use of child labour \", \"Suppliers protect migrant workers\", :Suppliers respect labour rights (wages / freedom of association etc)\"|<span style=\"color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;\">closed_bar</span>}}</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for “Contracts include clauses on forced labour”|<span style=\"color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;\">closed_bar</span>}}</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for “Beyond Tier 1” policies|<span style=\"color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;\">closed_bar</span>}}</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No",
        "In Development",
        "Suppliers comply with laws and company’s policies (direct / tier 1)",
        "Suppliers comply with laws and company’s policies (beyond tier 1)",
        "Prohibit use of forced labour (direct / tier 1)",
        "Prohibit use of forced labour (beyond tier 1)",
        "Code of conduct or supplier code includes clauses on slavery and human trafficking (direct / tier 1)",
        "Code of conduct or supplier code includes clauses on slavery and human trafficking (beyond tier 1)",
        "Contracts include clauses on forced labour (direct / tier 1)",
        "Contracts include clauses on forced labour (beyond tier 1)",
        "Suppliers produce their own statement (direct / tier 1)",
        "Suppliers produce their own statement (beyond tier 1)",
        "Prohibit charging of recruitment fees to employee (direct / tier 1)",
        "Prohibit charging of recruitment fees to employee (beyond tier 1)",
        "Prohibit use of child labour (direct / tier 1)",
        "Prohibit use of child labour (beyond tier 1)",
        "Suppliers protect migrant workers (direct / tier 1)",
        "Suppliers protect migrant workers (beyond tier 1)",
        "Suppliers respect labour rights (wages / freedom of association etc) (direct / tier 1)",
        "Suppliers respect labour rights (wages / freedom of association etc) (beyond tier 1)"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3943,
      "bookmarkers": 11,
      "datasets": 78,
      "companies": 2342,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_policy_applicable_beyond_tier_1_binary.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_policy_applicable_to_tier_1_binary.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+AUS_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_policy_revised+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2722136,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA policy applies to beyond tier 1 supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_policy_applies_to_beyond_tier_1_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA policy applies to beyond tier 1 supply chain",
      "question": "Does the company’s statement detail specific, organisational policies or actions to combat slavery in beyond tier 1 supply chains?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Establishing effective policies to combat modern slavery is listed as one potential component of a modern slavery statement within the UK Modern Slavery Act and is recommended by the Home Office guidance accompanying it. Clear organisational policies help to set the tone in assessing, preventing and mitigating the risk of, and working to influence and remedy, modern slavery in organisations and their supply chains. It also helps to demonstrate a company’s commitment to tackling modern slavery.</p><p>For further information on policies use the [[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf|Home Office Guidance, pp. 28-30]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Does the company’s statement detail <strong>clear, organisational modern slavery</strong> policies that cascade down their supply chains and apply beyond tier 1? These policies must be explicit and go beyond vague statements.</p><p>Beyond Tier 1 includes the use of sub-contractors, and any non-direct suppliers.</p><p>Policies include:</p><ol><li><p>requiring all suppliers and contractors to comply with local and international laws, and company’s policies,</p></li><li><p>prohibiting contractors or suppliers from using forced labour, involuntary labour, debt bondage or human trafficking,</p></li><li><p>the ability to terminate contracts based on violation of supplier code, or violation of modern slavery policies,</p></li><li><p>requiring contracts to include clauses on forced labour or supply chains, or</p></li><li><p>requiring suppliers to produce their own statement on modern slavery and forced labour.</p></li></ol><p><strong>Please note this metric refers to organisational polices that are clear and explicitly tackle modern slavery. It does not measure supplier engagement such as supplier audits, questionnaires, site visits, etc., this is measured by the metric: ‘Continuous engagement with suppliers.’</strong><br> Please select as many policies as apply. These policies apply to beyond tier 1 suppliers if the company has a mechanism in place through which their policies “cascade” down the supply chain (e.g. by requiring direct suppliers to ensure that their suppliers also adhere to the company’s relevant policies).</p><p>Unless there is specific mention of a mechanism through which the company's policies are applied to suppliers beyond Tier 1, please fill out details under the previous metric.</p><p>If no such policy exists, then please select <strong>“No”</strong>.</p><p>If the business indicates it is developing a modern slavery supply chain policy or planning to implement one in the future, please indicate <strong>“In Development”</strong>.</p><p>For each value, please include a comment that copies relevant information from the statement. If the policy that you wish to include is not listed, please add a comment and flag the section for review.</p><p>{{Example for <strong>“Suppliers comply with laws and company’s\r\npolicies”</strong>, <strong>“Prohibit use of forced\r\nlabour”, “Terminate contracts based on violation”, “Contracts include clauses\r\non forced labour”</strong> for beyond tier 1 suppliers|closed; hide: closed_content}}</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Suppliers comply with laws and company’s policies",
        "Prohibit use of forced labour",
        "Code of conduct or supplier code includes clauses on slavery and human trafficking",
        "Contracts include clauses on forced labour",
        "Suppliers produce their own statement",
        "In Development",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_policy_applies_to_beyond_tier_1_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2722169,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA risk management (revised)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_risk_management_revised.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA risk management (revised)",
      "question": "Does the company continuously monitor suppliers to ensure that they comply with the company’s policies and local laws?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Human rights due diligence is a key concept in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Due diligence processes should include ‘assessing actual and potential human rights impacts, integrating and acting upon the findings, tracking responses, and communicating how impacts are addressed.’ (See the [[http://www.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf&amp;action=default&amp;DefaultItemOpen=1|UN Guiding Principles]]). Part of due diligence processes is not just assessing initial risk through questionnaires or having in place policies, but monitoring this risk through continuous engagement with suppliers.</p><p>For further information on this metric please refer to the [[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf|Home Office Guidance, pp. 32-33]], and the [[http://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/business.walkfreefoundation.org-assets/content/uploads/2016/09/08101240/TacklingModernSlaveryInSupplyChains20141-1.pdf|Walk Free Foundation Guidance, pp. 37-39]].</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Does the company <strong>manage the risk</strong> of modern slavery by <strong>continuously engaging</strong> with suppliers?</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Select as many examples of continuous engagement as apply*</span></p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>conducting <strong>audits</strong> of suppliers (including high risk suppliers) - self reporting &amp; independent</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>conducting <strong>on-site visits</strong> of suppliers<span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\"> </span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">- self reporting &amp; independent</span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p>In some instances, these mechanisms are conducted by the suppliers or company themselves, or are conducted independently. If these are conducted by the company itself or the supplier, please select the value with<strong> (self-reporting)</strong>. If conducted by a third party, or an external, independent agency, please select <strong>(independent)</strong> value.</p>\r\n<p>If no such continuous engagement is described, then please select <strong>“No”</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>If the business indicates it is developing continuous engagement mechanisms, or planning to implement these in the future, please indicate <strong>“In Development”</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>For each value, please include a comment that copies relevant information from the statement. If the example of continuous engagement that you wish to include is not listed among the answer options, please add a comment and flag the section for review.</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for “Audits (independent)” value|<code>closed_bar</code>}}</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for “In Development” value|<code>closed_bar</code>}}</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for <span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">self-reporting and independent </span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">“On-site visits” and \"Audits\"|closed_bar}}</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Audits of suppliers (self- reporting)",
        "Audits of suppliers (independent)",
        "On-site visits (self- reporting)",
        "On-site visits (independent)",
        "In Development",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3935,
      "bookmarkers": 6,
      "datasets": 78,
      "companies": 2343,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_risk_management_grouped.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_supply_chain_due_diligence.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_risk_management_revised+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2722223,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA risk assessment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_risk_assessment.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA risk assessment",
      "question": "How does the company assess the risks of modern slavery and trafficking in their supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>After mapping out their supply chain, a company must then assess the risk of modern slavery occurring within it. This enables the company to take targeted action against modern slavery. This assessment can take place as part of an organisation’s wider approach to risk, but should be proportionate the company’s size, structure, location of supply chains and nature of business.</p><p>For further information on Risk Assessment please refer to the [[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf|Home Office Guidance, pp. 34-35]].</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Does the company’s statement include details about whether the <strong>company has taken steps to assess risk</strong> of slavery or forced labour in its operations and/or supply chain? This metric asks <strong>how</strong> a company assesses risks, not which risks it has identified. The risk assessment tools must be specific to modern slavery and go beyond general tools related to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR).</p>\r\n<p>This can include:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Requiring all new suppliers to complete risk-based questionnaires. If the company reports conducting employee interviews as part of its risk assessment process, this would also fall under \"Risk-based questionnaires\".</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>The use of a specified risk management database or tool, such as Maplecroft or Sedex, or</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Conducting research to assess risk, for example using existing research such as the Global Slavery Index, the Corruption Perception Index, Human Rights Watch reports, Amnesty International Reports or reports produced by the UN.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p><strong>Please note this metric refers to the tools or mechanisms that company’s use to assess risk. Identifying where risk is highest is covered under the metric: ‘MSA Identification of risks’</strong></p>\r\n<p><strong>*Select as many examples of training as apply:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">“Risk-based questionnaires” </strong><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">if a company outlines th</span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">at it requires suppliers or workers to complete questions</span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\"> </span></li>\r\n<li><strong>“Use of risk management tool or software” </strong>if a company describes a tool, such as a risk matrix, or the use of software such as maplecroft or sedex.</li>\r\n<li><strong>“Conducting research”</strong><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\"> if a company describes conducting its own research into its supply chain</span></li>\r\n<li><strong style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">“In Development”</strong> if the business indicates it is developing risk management tools specific to modern slavery or planning to implement one in the future, please indicate </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Select<strong> “No”</strong> where there are no details of risk assessment strategies.</p>\r\n<p>For each value, please include a comment that copies relevant information and page numbers from the statement. If the policy that you wish to include is not listed among the answer options, please add a comment and flag the section for review.</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for <strong>“Risk based questionnaires” </strong>value|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for <strong>“Use of risk management tool or software”</strong> value|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for<strong> “Conducting research” </strong>value|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": "{\r\n  \"Risk-based questionnaires\" : \"Risk-based questionnaires\",\r\n  \"Use of risk management tool or software\" : \"Use of risk management tool or software\",\r\n  \"Conducting desk research including information from third parties/NGO's\": \"Conducting research\",\r\n  \"In Development\": \"In Development\",\r\n  \"No\": \"No\"\r\n} \r\n",
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3941,
      "bookmarkers": 10,
      "datasets": 79,
      "companies": 2338,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Risk_assessment_but_none_identified_binary.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Risk_Assessment_grouped.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_risk_assessment_risk_identified_binary.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Risk_assessment_categories.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_risk_assessment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2722444,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA incidents remediation (revised)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_incidents_remediation_revised.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA incidents remediation (revised)",
      "question": "In the modern slavery statement, does the company explain one or more of the corrective steps it has taken (or would take) in response to modern slavery incidents in their operations and/or supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Should a company find instances of modern slavery in its own operations and/or supply chain, the company has a responsibility to respect the human rights of those affected, and should take steps to investigate and ‘provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes’ ([[http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf|UN Guiding Principles]]). This can include taking <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">collaborative approaches, such as working with the supplier to tackle the problem through corrective action plans, or more </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">punitive action such as cancelling contracts with the supplier. Working with suppliers will help to prevent such instances occurring in the future and will reinforce respect for human rights throughout the supply chain.</span></p>\r\n<p>Remediation policies can be in place regardless of whether incidents have been identified. Where the company has identified at least one incident of slavery, this question can be answered in relation to their response to those incidents.</p>\r\n<p>Where the company has not identified any incidents of slavery, this question should be answered based on whether they describe a clear plan or policy for remediating such incidents should they be identified in future.</p>\r\n<p>For further information on remediation please refer to the [[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf|Home Office Guidance, pp. 34 and 37]].</p>\r\n<p>For further information on Corrective Action Plans please refer to the [[http://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/business.walkfreefoundation.org-assets/content/uploads/2016/09/08101240/TacklingModernSlaveryInSupplyChains20141-1.pdf|Walk Free Foundation Guidance, pp. 31 – 34]].</p>\r\n<p>The option \"Remediation is mentioned but no details of the process or measures\" was added in 2024.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Has the company disclosed the steps it would take if a supplier or internal department is found to be engaging in any activities related to modern slavery or human trafficking?</p>\r\n<p>Examples of corrective steps include:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Providing remediation direct to the worker affected (backpayment of wages, support to prosecute or pursue a civil claim etc)</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Informing senior management of instances of modern slavery</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Taking steps to support or work with the supplier to respond to instances of modern slavery by instigating corrective action plans, or</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Canceling the contracts of suppliers who are found to use modern slavery</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p>If the company specifies the remediation available for individual workers affected by modern slavery, such as backpayment of wages or support to pursue a claim, please select the <strong>“Worker remediation”</strong> value. </p>\r\n<p>If the company specifies that senior management will be informed if instances of modern slavery have been identified, please select the <strong>“Senior management”</strong> value. <span style=\"background-color: #fbeeb8;\">Note: Reports to an authority, only counts if it is clear the </span><span style=\"background-color: #fbeeb8;\">authority </span><span style=\"background-color: #fbeeb8;\">is from  Senior Management.</span></p>\r\n<p>If the company supports the supplier to respond to instances of modern slavery, please select the <strong>“Corrective action plan”</strong> value.</p>\r\n<p>If the company identifies punitive action, by canceling the contracts of suppliers, please select the <strong>“Cancel contracts” </strong>value.<span style=\"background-color: #fbeeb8;\"> Note: Also select this option if the company mentions it didn't cancel any contracts. </span><span style=\"font-size: 13px; color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-family: 'docs-IBM Plex Sans'; font-style: normal; text-decoration-skip-ink: none;\"><br></span></p>\r\n<p>If the company mentions remediation but does not provide any details about the nature of the measures or processes, select <strong>\"Remediation is mentioned but no details of the processes or measures\".</strong></p>\r\n<p>If no such information exists in the statement, then please select<strong> “No”</strong>.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Please select as many options as apply.</strong></p>\r\n<p>Please include a comment that copies relevant information from the statement.</p>\r\n<p>If the remediation action described in the statement is not listed above among the possible answer options, please include the information from the statement in the comments section, and flag for review.</p>\r\n<p>If the business indicates it is developing a remediation policy or planning to implement one in the future, please indicate <strong>“In Development” </strong>and again provide details in the comment.</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for  \"<strong>Worker Remediation\" </strong>value|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for <strong>“Senior Management” </strong>value|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for <strong>“Corrective action plan” and “Cancel contracts” </strong>value|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Worker remediation",
        "Corrective action plan",
        "Senior management",
        "Cancel contracts",
        "In Development",
        "Remediation is mentioned but no details of the process or measures",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4567,
      "bookmarkers": 6,
      "datasets": 89,
      "companies": 2881,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_supply_chain_due_diligence.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_incidents_remediation_binary.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_incidents_remediation_revised+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2722458,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA whistleblowing mechanism (revised)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_whistleblowing_mechanism_revised.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA whistleblowing mechanism (revised)",
      "question": "Does the company describe a grievance mechanism to facilitate whistle-blowing or the reporting of suspected incidents of slavery or trafficking?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Businesses should provide a hotline or other grievance mechanism so that anyone part of or witness to their operations and supply chains may report or flag suspected incidents of slavey or trafficking. As part of business’ responsibility to respect worker’s rights, those affected by modern slavery and those witnessing violations in any part of a company’s operations should be able to freely report incidents. These mechanisms should be clear and transparent, and any incidents should be recorded and monitored. <br><br>For further information on grievance mechanisms please refer to the [[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf|Home Office Guidance, pp. 33]] or the [[http://corporate-responsibility.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/CSO_TISC_guidance_final_digitalversion_16.03.16.pdf|CORE Guidance, pp. 19]].</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Does the company provide a <strong>hotline</strong> or <strong>reporting mechanism</strong> where grievances or suspected incidents of slavery or trafficking can be reported for <strong>direct employees and/or supply chains workers</strong>?</p>\r\n<p>A whistleblowing mechanisms may include:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>A<strong> reporting line or hotline</strong> that workers can call (reporting managed by third parties, or reporting platforms like a 'Speak Up' tool, not policy, fall in this category too) </p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong>Whistleblower protections</strong> for employees so they will not be penalised if they report modern slavery cases (mention of any kind of protection is sufficient e.g. \"<em>we ensure that anyone raising such concern will not suffer dismissal, disciplinary action, threats or other unfavourable treatment as a result\" </em>). If the disclosure specifies that grievances can be reported anonymously or confidentially, that also is sufficient for this answer option. <span style=\"background-color: #fbeeb8;\">Key words: Retaliation, repercussions, fear, reprisal, detriment </span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>An <strong>employee or independent focal point</strong> to whom reports can be made. A focal point is in place permanently. If the statement states that reports of violations can be shared with auditors or other personnel operating at the company on a temporary basis, they would not qualify as a focal point.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p>A <em>direct employee</em> is someone who is working directly for the company either in the company head office or in regional offices.</p>\r\n<p>A <em>supply chain worker</em> is someone who is employed by contractors or sub-contractors further down the supply chain.</p>\r\n<p>For many companies the risk of forced labour is much greater within their supply chain rather than in their own operations - as such the provision of a mechanism that extends to workers within the company’s supply chain is regarded as a positive step.</p>\r\n<p>Please <strong>select as many mechanisms as apply</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>NOTE: 'Speak Up' or any other policy can be sufficient to meet the answer 'Hotline, Email, Contact Form' if details are provided specifying how workers' concerns can be raised. If it is not explicitly stated, it cannot be assumed.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Where there is no mention in the statement of who the mechanism applies to, please assume it applies only to direct employees</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>If the business indicates it is developing a whistleblowing or grievance mechanism or planning to implement one in the future, please indicate<strong> “In Development” </strong>and again give details in the comments section.</p>\r\n<p>Please select <strong>\"No\" </strong>if no whistleblowing mechanism is described in the statement.</p>\r\n<p>For each value, please include a comment that copies relevant information from the statement. If the policy that you wish to include is not listed, please add a comment and flag the section for review.</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for “Hotline” for Employees value|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for “Whistleblower Protections” value|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p>{{Example for “Employee or Independent Focal Point” value|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": "{\r\n  \"Hotline, Email, Contact Form (direct employees)\": \"Hotline (direct employees)\",\r\n  \"Hotline, Email, Contact Form (supply chain workers)\": \"Hotline (supply chain workers)\",\r\n  \"Whistleblower protection (direct employees)\": \"Whistleblower protection (direct employees)\",\r\n  \"Whistleblower protection (supply chain workers)\": \"Whistleblower protection (supply chain workers)\",\r\n  \"Focal Point (direct employees)\": \"Focal Point (direct employees)\",\r\n  \"Focal Point (supply chain workers)\": \"Focal Point (supply chain workers)\",\r\n  \"In Development (direct employees)\": \"In Development (direct employees)\",\r\n  \"In Development (supply chain workers)\": \"In Development (supply chain workers)\",\r\n  \"No\": \"No\"\r\n}",
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4385,
      "bookmarkers": 8,
      "datasets": 86,
      "companies": 2708,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_whistleblowing_mechanism_binary.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_whistleblowing_mechanism_revised+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2722470,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA whistleblowing mechanism for supply chain workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_whistleblowing_mechanism_for_supply_chain_workers.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA whistleblowing mechanism for supply chain workers",
      "question": "Does the company have a grievance mechanism in place to facilitate whistle-blowing or the reporting of suspected incidents of slavery or trafficking for supply chain workers? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Businesses should provide a hotline or\r\nother grievance mechanism so that supply chain workers may report or flag\r\nsuspected incidents of slavey or trafficking. As part of business’\r\nresponsibility to respect worker’s rights, those affected by modern slavery and\r\nthose witnessing violations in any part of a company’s supply chain should be\r\nable to freely report incidents. These mechanisms should be clear and\r\ntransparent, and any incidents should be recorded and monitored. For many\r\ncompanies the risk of forced labour is much greater within their supply chain rather\r\nthan in their own operations - as such the provision of a mechanism that\r\nextends to workers within the company’s supply chain is regarded as a positive\r\nstep.<br>\r\n<br>\r\nFor further information on grievance mechanisms please refer to the [[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf|Home\r\nOffice Guidance, pp. 33]] or the [[http://corporate-responsibility.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/CSO_TISC_guidance_final_digitalversion_16.03.16.pdf|CORE\r\nGuidance, pp. 19]].</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Does the company provide a <strong>hotline</strong> or <strong>reporting mechanism</strong> where grievances or suspected incidents of slavery or trafficking can be reported which extends to <strong>workers within the company’s supply chain</strong>?</p><p>A whistleblowing mechanism may include:</p><ol><li><p>An anonymous reporting line or <strong>hotline</strong> that workers can call</p></li><li><p><strong>Whistleblower protections</strong> for employees and their families so they will not be penalised if they report modern slavery cases</p></li><li><p>An employee or independent <strong>focal point</strong> to whom reports can be made</p></li></ol><p>A <em>supply chain worker</em> is someone who is employed by contractors or sub-contractors further down the supply chain.</p><p>Please select as many mechanisms as apply.</p><p>Where there is no mention of who the mechanism applies to, please assume it applies to employees only and record under the previous metric.</p><p>If the business indicates it is developing a whistleblowing or grievance mechanism or planning to implement one in the future, please indicate<strong> “In Development” </strong>and again give details in the comments section.</p><p>Please select <strong>\"No\" </strong>if no whistleblowing mechanism is described in the statement.</p><p>For each value, please include a comment that copies relevant information from the statement. If the policy that you wish to include is not listed, please add a comment and flag the section for review.</p><p></p><p>{{Example for “Hotline”, “Whistleblower protection” for supply chain workers value|closed; hide: closed_content}}</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Hotline",
        "Whistleblower protection",
        "Focal Point",
        "In Development",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 27,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_whistleblowing_mechanism_for_supply_chain_workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2722482,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA training (revised)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_training_revised.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA training (revised)",
      "question": "Does the statement describe training for staff that is specifically geared towards detecting signs of slavery or trafficking?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Training is important for raising awareness and understanding the importance of modern slavery issues. It helps employees and suppliers identify the risks of modern slavery, and how to address such risks if they find them. Training can be targeted at specific groups of employees, especially those working in procurement, those who deal with supply chains or recruitment, or are in leadership positions. The training can be in any form (face-to-face or online) but should explicitly address modern slavery.<br><br>For further information on training please refer to the [[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf|Home Office Guidance on pp. 37]].</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Does the company provide <strong>training</strong> specifically to <strong>address modern slavery and human trafficking</strong>?</p>\r\n<p>This training can take place as a standalone course on modern slavery,  be part of the code of conduct (explicitly mentioned in the Statement), or be embedded in a wider training program on supply chains or human rights. It can cover many different groups- procurement specialists, and those that work in recruitment or leadership positions.</p>\r\n<p><strong>*Please select as many examples of training as apply.</strong></p>\r\n<p>Select:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Procurement/ purchasing. </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">T</span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">h</span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">e intended recipients of the training are those who work in procurement or purchasing.</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Recruitment/ HR.</span> <span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">T</span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">h</span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">e </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">training is targeting those who work in recruitment or human resources.</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Leadership. </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">T</span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">h</span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">e </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">leadership or management of the company receive training.</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Suppliers. </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">T</span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">h</span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">e </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">training is provided to suppliers and/or contractors.</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Employees (all). </span>Every<span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"> employee</span> (or every new employee) <span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">in the company is receiving training (e.g. induction process).</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Training provided - not specified. </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">The</span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"> recipients of the training are not specified. </span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"><strong>In Development</strong>. The business indicates it is developing a training programme, or plans to implement one in the future. </span>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Please include a comment if the company is planning on including elements of modern slavery to existing training, or developing training specific to modern slavery and human trafficking.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">No modern slavery training provided.</span> <span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">No training on modern slavery or human trafficking is described in the statement.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>For each instance of training, <strong>please include a comment</strong> that copies relevant information from the statement, answering the following questions (where available):</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>who provides the training (e.g. is it in house or outsourced to a training provider),</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>how often the training is conducted, and</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><em>whether or not</em> it is mandatory for the target group.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 12pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">{{Example for </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">“Procurement/ purchasing” </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">value|closed_bar}}</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 12pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">{{Example for </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">“Recruitment/ HR” </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">value|closed_bar}}</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 12pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">{{Example for </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">“Leadership” </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">value|closed_bar}}</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 12pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">{{Example for </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">“Suppliers” </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">value|closed_bar}}</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 12pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">{{Example for </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">“Employees (all)” </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">value|closed_bar}}</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 12pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">{{Example for </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">“Training provided- not specified” </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">value|closed_bar}}</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">{{Example of a </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">“In Development” </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">value|closed_bar}}</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": "{\r\n  \"Employees (all)\": \"Employees (all)\",\r\n  \"Procurement / purchasing\": \"Procurement / purchasing\",\r\n  \"Recruitment / HR\": \"Recruitment / HR\",\r\n  \"Leadership\": \"Leadership\",\r\n  \"Suppliers\": \"Suppliers\",\r\n  \"Training provided - not specified to who\": \"Training provided - not specified\",\r\n  \"In Development\": \"In Development\",\r\n  \"No modern slavery training provided\": \"No\"\r\n}",
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4041,
      "bookmarkers": 6,
      "datasets": 81,
      "companies": 2439,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_training_binary.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+AUS_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_statement_assessed.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_training_revised+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2722836,
      "name": "ReportWatch+ReportWatch Rating",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ReportWatch+ReportWatch_Rating.json",
      "designer": "ReportWatch",
      "title": "ReportWatch Rating",
      "question": "How the annual report of the company is rated by ReportWatch?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Company’s Annual Report rating by ReportWatch</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>http://www.reportwatch.net/home/rating/</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1584,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 508,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ReportWatch+ReportWatch_Rating+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2729679,
      "name": "ReportWatch+ReportWatch Rank",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ReportWatch+ReportWatch_Rank.json",
      "designer": "ReportWatch",
      "title": "ReportWatch Rank",
      "question": "How was the organization's annual report ranked by ReportWatch (out of 400)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Company’s Annual Report rank by ReportWatch</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>http://www.reportwatch.net/home/ranking/</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1586,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 508,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ReportWatch+ReportWatch_Rank+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2735486,
      "name": "PERI at University of Massachusetts Amherst+Peri Toxic 100 Water Polluters Rank",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/PERI_at_University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst+Peri_Toxic_100_Water_Polluters_Rank.json",
      "designer": "PERI at University of Massachusetts Amherst",
      "title": "Peri Toxic 100 Water Polluters Rank",
      "question": "If the company was named by PERI as one of the \"Toxic 100\" Water Polluters, What is their rank?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI), compiled by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in accordance with the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986, annually reports the weight (in pounds) of each of approximately 600 toxic chemicals released into the environment by major industrial facilities in the United States. In all, TRI-reporting facilities released slightly under 230 million pounds of toxic chemicals into water in 2014. (The weight refers to the chemicals themselves, not including solutions or sludge carrying the chemicals.)</p><p>The Political Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts AMHERST uses the Toxic 100 Water Polluters index to identify the top U.S. air polluters among the world's largest corporations.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>https://www.peri.umass.edu/toxic-100-water-polluters-technical-notes</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "ranked",
      "range": "1-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 100,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/PERI_at_University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst+Peri_Toxic_100_Water_Polluters_Rank+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2736090,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Health and Safety incidents of non-compliance fined, GRI 416-2-a1 (formerly G4-PR2-a1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Health_and_Safety_incidents_of_non_compliance_fined_GRI_416_2_a1_formerly_G4_PR2_a1.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Health and Safety incidents of non-compliance fined, GRI 416-2-a1 (formerly G4-PR2-a1)",
      "question": "What is the total number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations concerning health and safety impacts of products and services during their life cycle resulting in a fine or penalty?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society.</p>\r\n<p>The GRI Standards are structured as a set of interrelated, modular standards. The full set can be downloaded at www.globalreporting.org/standards/. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric (G4-PR-2a) can be found <a href=\"/Health_and_Safety_incidents_of_non-compliance%20G4_PR2-a-Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates.</p>\r\n<p>GRI 416 addresses the topic of customer health and safety, including an organization’s systematic efforts to address health and safety across the life cycle of a product or service, and its adherence to customer health and safety regulations and voluntary codes.</p>\r\n<p>These concepts are covered in key instruments of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: see References. The disclosures in this Standard can provide information on an organization’s impacts related to customer health and safety, and how it manages these impacts.</p>\r\n<p>Full disclosure guidance can be found here: <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1031/gri-416-customer-health-and-safety-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 416: Customer Health and Safety</a>. Additional disclosures that relate to this topic can also be found in: <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1032/gri-417-marketing-and-labeling-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 417: Marketing and Labeling</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this metric question you need to identify for a specific year, <strong>fines</strong> the organization has received for <strong>health &amp; safety non-compiance</strong>. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported, or not found, select the 'Unknown' answer box.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords</strong> and search terms: Health, Safety, GRI, PR, fine</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If any calculations are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <strong>page number</strong> where you found the answer.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 416 - Customer Health and Safety",
        "GRI Standards+416-2 Incidents of non-compliance concerning the health and safety impacts of products and services"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 22,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 22,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Health_and_Safety_incidents_of_non_compliance_fined_GRI_416_2_a1_formerly_G4_PR2_a1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2736481,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Health and Safety incidents of non-compliance - warning, GRI 416-2-a2 (formerly G4-PR2-a2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Health_and_Safety_incidents_of_non_compliance_warning_GRI_416_2_a2_formerly_G4_PR2_a2.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Health and Safety incidents of non-compliance - warning, GRI 416-2-a2 (formerly G4-PR2-a2)",
      "question": "What is the total number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations concerning health and safety impacts of products and services during their life cycle resulting in a warning?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The GRI Standards are structured as a set of interrelated, modular standards. The full set can be downloaded at www.globalreporting.org/standards/. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric (G4-PR-2a) can be found <a href=\"/Health_and_Safety_incidents_of_non-compliance%20G4_PR2-a-Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">GRI 416 addresses the topic of customer health and safety, including an organization’s systematic efforts to address health and safety across the life cycle of a product or service, and its adherence to customer health and safety regulations and voluntary codes.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">These concepts are covered in key instruments of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: see References. The disclosures in this Standard can provide information on an organization’s impacts related to customer health and safety, and how it manages these impacts.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Full disclosure guidance can be found here: <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1031/gri-416-customer-health-and-safety-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 416: Customer Health and Safety</a>. Additional disclosures that relate to this topic can also be found in: <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1032/gri-417-marketing-and-labeling-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 417: Marketing and Labeling</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this metric question you need to identify for a specific year, <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">warnings</span> the organization has received for <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">health &amp; safety non-compiance</span>. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported, or not found, select the 'Unknown' answer box.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> and search terms: Health, Safety, GRI, PR, warning</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If any calculations are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 416 - Customer Health and Safety",
        "GRI Standards+416-2 Incidents of non-compliance concerning the health and safety impacts of products and services"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 18,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Health_and_Safety_incidents_of_non_compliance_warning_GRI_416_2_a2_formerly_G4_PR2_a2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2736493,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Health and Safety incidents of non-compliance - voluntary codes, GRI 416-2-a3 (formerly G4-PR2-a3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Health_and_Safety_incidents_of_non_compliance_voluntary_codes_GRI_416_2_a3_formerly_G4_PR2_a3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Health and Safety incidents of non-compliance - voluntary codes, GRI 416-2-a3 (formerly G4-PR2-a3)",
      "question": "What is the total number of incidents of non-compliance with voluntary codes concerning health and safety impacts of products and services during their life cycle?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The GRI Standards are structured as a set of interrelated, modular standards. The full set can be downloaded at www.globalreporting.org/standards/. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric (G4-PR-2a) can be found <a href=\"/Health_and_Safety_incidents_of_non-compliance%20G4_PR2-a-Methodology\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">GRI 416 addresses the topic of customer health and safety, including an organization’s systematic efforts to address health and safety across the life cycle of a product or service, and its adherence to customer health and safety regulations and voluntary codes.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">These concepts are covered in key instruments of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: see References. The disclosures in this Standard can provide information on an organization’s impacts related to customer health and safety, and how it manages these impacts.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Full disclosure guidance can be found here: <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1031/gri-416-customer-health-and-safety-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 416: Customer Health and Safety</a>. Additional disclosures that relate to this topic can also be found in: <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1032/gri-417-marketing-and-labeling-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 417: Marketing and Labeling</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this metric question you need to identify for a specific year, the organization's <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">incidents of non-compliance with voluntary codes of </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bold;\">health &amp; safety</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported, or not found, select the 'Unknown' answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> and search terms: Health, Safety, GRI, PR, voluntary, code</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If any calculations are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Health_and_Safety_incidents_of_non_compliance_voluntary_codes_GRI_416_2_a3_formerly_G4_PR2_a3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2736580,
      "name": "PERI at University of Massachusetts Amherst+Peri Greenhouse 100 Polluters Rank",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/PERI_at_University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst+Peri_Greenhouse_100_Polluters_Rank.json",
      "designer": "PERI at University of Massachusetts Amherst",
      "title": "Peri Greenhouse 100 Polluters Rank",
      "question": "If the company was named by PERI as one of the \"Toxic 100\" Greenhouse Polluters, What is their rank?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program database (GHGRP), compiled by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in response to the FY2008&nbsp;<a href=\"http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collection.action?collectionCode=BILLS\" title=\"Opens external link in new window\">Consolidated Appropriations Act (H.R. 2764; Public Law 110--161)</a>, annually reports the weight (in metric tons) of greenhouse gasses from both large direct emission sources and suppliers of fossil fuels. From an EPA&nbsp;<a href=\"http://www.ccdsupport.com/confluence/display/ghgp/About+the+GHG+Reporting+Program\" title=\"Opens external link in new window\">About the Program page</a>: \"In general, facilities that directly emit 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent or more per year are required to submit annual reports to EPA. In addition, suppliers of certain products that would result in GHG emissions if released, combusted or oxidized are required to report.\" Data has been reported so far (as of January 2016) for 2010 through 2014.&nbsp;</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>https://www.peri.umass.edu/technical-notes-greenhouse-100-polluters-index</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 96,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 96,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/PERI_at_University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst+Peri_Greenhouse_100_Polluters_Rank+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2737338,
      "name": "United States Environmental Protection Agency+Greenhouse Gas Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/United_States_Environmental_Protection_Agency+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "United States Environmental Protection Agency",
      "title": "Greenhouse Gas Emissions",
      "question": "What is the company's Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) in tons of CO2 equivalent?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Company’s Greenhouse Gas emissions in tons of CO2 equivalent</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 99,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 97,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/United_States_Environmental_Protection_Agency+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2737845,
      "name": "United States Environmental Protection Agency+Toxics released to surface water",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/United_States_Environmental_Protection_Agency+Toxics_released_to_surface_water.json",
      "designer": "United States Environmental Protection Agency",
      "title": "Toxics released to surface water",
      "question": "What is the amount of toxics the company released to surface water?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Toxics released to surface water</strong>: Millions of pounds of toxic chemical released directly to water on-site plus estimated post-treatment release to surface water from toxic chemicals transferred to Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) for sewage treatment. Source: U.S. EPA.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "millions of pounds",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 99,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 99,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/United_States_Environmental_Protection_Agency+Toxics_released_to_surface_water+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2738372,
      "name": "United States Environmental Protection Agency+Toxics transferred  to POTW sewage treatment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/United_States_Environmental_Protection_Agency+Toxics_transferred_to_POTW_sewage_treatment.json",
      "designer": "United States Environmental Protection Agency",
      "title": "Toxics transferred  to POTW sewage treatment",
      "question": "What is the amount of toxics the company transfer off-site to Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) for sewage treatment, without weighting for toxicity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Toxics released directly to surface water or transferred to sewage treatment</strong>: Millions of pounds of toxic chemicals released directly to water on-site at each TRI facility or transferred off-site to Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) for sewage treatment, without weighting for toxicity. Source: U.S. EPA.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "millions of pounds",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 99,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 99,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/United_States_Environmental_Protection_Agency+Toxics_transferred_to_POTW_sewage_treatment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2768998,
      "name": "WPP+Female Percentage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/WPP+Female_Percentage.json",
      "designer": "WPP",
      "title": "Female Percentage",
      "question": "What is the female percentage who are employed? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Percentage of females currently employed based on the 2015 sustainability report for WPP. </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/WPP+Female_Percentage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2778477,
      "name": "Elizabeth Potter+Average Cost per Employee on Training",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Elizabeth_Potter+Average_Cost_per_Employee_on_Training.json",
      "designer": "Elizabeth Potter",
      "title": "Average Cost per Employee on Training",
      "question": "What is the average cost per employee on training in the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Elizabeth_Potter+Average_Cost_per_Employee_on_Training+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2879755,
      "name": "EU Transparency Register+Number of employees involved in the EU transparency activities: Full time equivalent (FTE)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/EU_Transparency_Register+Number_of_employees_involved_in_the_EU_transparency_activities_Full_time_equivalent_FTE.json",
      "designer": "EU Transparency Register",
      "title": "Number of employees involved in the EU transparency activities: Full time equivalent (FTE)",
      "question": "Number of persons involved Full time equivalent (FTE) in activities covered by the EU transparency register",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Citizens can, and indeed should, expect the EU decision-making process to be as transparent and open as possible. The more open the process is, the easier it is to ensure balanced representation and avoid undue pressure and illegitimate or privileged access to information or to decision-makers. Transparency is also a key part of encouraging European citizens to participate more actively in the democratic life of the EU.</p><p>The transparency register has been set up to answer core questions such as what interests are being pursued, by whom and with what budgets. The system is operated jointly by the European Parliament and the European Commission.</p><p>This metric asks companies to declare the number of persons&nbsp;(Full time equivalent) involved in activities (like lobbying) covered by the EU transparency register.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "people",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1005,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 683,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/EU_Transparency_Register+Number_of_employees_involved_in_the_EU_transparency_activities_Full_time_equivalent_FTE+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2886406,
      "name": "EU Transparency Register+Number of employees involved in the EU transparency activities from the company expressed in % of working time",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/EU_Transparency_Register+Number_of_employees_involved_in_the_EU_transparency_activities_from_the_company_expressed_in_of_working_time.json",
      "designer": "EU Transparency Register",
      "title": "Number of employees involved in the EU transparency activities from the company expressed in % of working time",
      "question": "What is the number of employees involved in the EU transparency activities from the company expressed in % of working time?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Citizens can, and indeed should, expect the EU decision-making process to be as transparent and open as possible. The more open the process is, the easier it is to ensure balanced representation and avoid undue pressure and illegitimate or privileged access to information or to decision-makers. Transparency is also a key part of encouraging European citizens to participate more actively in the democratic life of the EU.</p><p>The transparency register has been set up to answer core questions such as what interests are being pursued, by whom and with what budgets. The system is operated jointly by the European Parliament and the European Commission.</p><p>This metric asks companies to declare the number of employees involved in the EU transparency activities from the company expressed in % of working time</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 605,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 605,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/EU_Transparency_Register+Number_of_employees_involved_in_the_EU_transparency_activities_from_the_company_expressed_in_of_working_time+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2890253,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+G1. Policy Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+G1_Policy_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "G1. Policy Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company make an explicit, clearly articulated policy commitment to human rights, including freedom of expression and privacy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>The company should publicly commit to respect users’ human rights to freedom of expression and privacy.</strong><br><br>This indicator seeks evidence that the company has made explicit [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#policycommitment|<strong>policy commitment</strong>]] to freedom of expression and privacy. This standard is outlined in the [[http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf|UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights’ Operational Principle 16]], which states that companies should adopt formal policies publicly affirming their commitments to international human rights principles and standards. This indicator seeks disclosure of such a policy commitment in formal policy documents or other communications that reflect official company policy.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Note that this indicator evaluates a company’s official <strong>policy commitment</strong> to<em> both</em> freedom of expression and privacy. These commitments must be publicly available. Companies with policies that mention only one (freedom of expression or privacy) will receive partial credit.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Policy commitment</strong> – A publicly available statement that represents official company policy which has been approved at the highest levels of the company.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company human rights policy</p></li><li><p>Company statements, reports, or other communications that reflect official company policy</p></li><li><p>Company annual report or sustainability report that refers to official policy documents</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+G1_Policy_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2890263,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.1 Access to terms of service - Prepaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_1_Access_to_terms_of_service_Prepaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1.1 Access to terms of service - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "Are the company’s prepaid mobile terms of service easy to find?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>A document that is “<strong>easy to find</strong>” should be located on the home page of the company or service, or at most, on a page that is one or two clicks away from the home page.</p><p></p><p><strong>In the comment to the metric value provide an explanation of where and how you found the document(s).</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Note:</strong> Privacy policies are not included in this indicator since they are covered in separate indicators in the “Privacy” section.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Terms of Service </strong>– This document may also be called Terms of Use, Terms and Conditions, etc. The terms of service “often provide the necessary ground rules for how various online services should be used,” as stated by the EFF, and represent a legal agreement between the company and the user. Companies can take action against users and their content based on information in the terms of service.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.eff.org/issues/terms-of-abuse|Electronic Frontier Foundation, “Terms of (Ab)use”]]</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company terms of service, terms of use, terms and conditions, etc.</p></li><li><p>Company acceptable use policy, community guidelines, rules, etc.</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Terms of Service",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.1 Access to terms of service - Prepaid Mobile+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_1_Access_to_terms_of_service_Prepaid_Mobile+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_1_Access_to_terms_of_service_Prepaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2890273,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.1 Access to terms of service - Postpaid  Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_1_Access_to_terms_of_service_Postpaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1.1 Access to terms of service - Postpaid  Mobile",
      "question": "Are the company’s postpaid mobile terms of service easy to find?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>A document that is “<strong>easy to find</strong>” should be located on the home page of the company or service, or at most, on a page that is one or two clicks away from the home page.</p><p></p><p><strong>In the comment to the metric value provide an explanation of where and how you found the document(s).</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Note:</strong> Privacy policies are not included in this indicator since they are covered in separate indicators in the “Privacy” section.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Terms of Service </strong>– This document may also be called Terms of Use, Terms and Conditions, etc. The terms of service “often provide the necessary ground rules for how various online services should be used,” as stated by the EFF, and represent a legal agreement between the company and the user. Companies can take action against users and their content based on information in the terms of service.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.eff.org/issues/terms-of-abuse|Electronic Frontier Foundation, “Terms of (Ab)use”]]</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company terms of service, terms of use, terms and conditions, etc.</p></li><li><p>Company acceptable use policy, community guidelines, rules, etc.</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Terms of Service",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.1 Access to terms of service - Postpaid  Mobile+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_1_Access_to_terms_of_service_Postpaid_Mobile+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_1_Access_to_terms_of_service_Postpaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2890283,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.1 Access to terms of service - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_1_Access_to_terms_of_service_Fixed_Line_Broadband.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1.1 Access to terms of service - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "Are the company’s fixed line broadband terms of service easy to find?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>A document that is “<strong>easy to find</strong>” should be located on the home page of the company or service, or at most, on a page that is one or two clicks away from the home page.</p><p></p><p><strong>In the comment to the metric value provide an explanation of where and how you found the document(s).</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Note:</strong> Privacy policies are not included in this indicator since they are covered in separate indicators in the “Privacy” section.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Terms of Service </strong>– This document may also be called Terms of Use, Terms and Conditions, etc. The terms of service “often provide the necessary ground rules for how various online services should be used,” as stated by the EFF, and represent a legal agreement between the company and the user. Companies can take action against users and their content based on information in the terms of service.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.eff.org/issues/terms-of-abuse|Electronic Frontier Foundation, “Terms of (Ab)use”]]</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company terms of service, terms of use, terms and conditions, etc.</p></li><li><p>Company acceptable use policy, community guidelines, rules, etc.</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Terms of Service",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.1 Access to terms of service - Fixed Line Broadband+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_1_Access_to_terms_of_service_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_1_Access_to_terms_of_service_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2890311,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.2 Access to terms of service - Prepaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_2_Access_to_terms_of_service_Prepaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1.2 Access to terms of service - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "Are the terms of service for the company’s prepaid mobile services available in the language(s) most commonly spoken by the company’s users?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect a company to take steps to help users understand the information presented in their documents.</p><p></p><p><strong>Note: </strong>Privacy policies are not included in this indicator since they are covered in separate indicators in the “Privacy” section.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Terms of Service </strong>– This document may also be called Terms of Use, Terms and Conditions, etc. The terms of service “often provide the necessary ground rules for how various online services should be used,” as stated by the EFF, and represent a legal agreement between the company and the user. Companies can take action against users and their content based on information in the terms of service.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.eff.org/issues/terms-of-abuse|Electronic Frontier Foundation, “Terms of (Ab)use”]]<br></p></li><li><p><strong>Easy to understand / understandable manner </strong>– The company has taken steps to help users actually understand the Terms of Service. This includes, but is not limited to, providing summaries, tips, or guidance that explain what the terms mean, using section headers, readable font size, or other graphic features to help users understand the document, or writing the terms using readable syntax.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company terms of service, terms of use, terms and conditions, etc.</p></li><li><p>Company acceptable use policy, community guidelines, rules, etc.</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Terms of Service",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.2 Access to terms of service - Prepaid Mobile+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_2_Access_to_terms_of_service_Prepaid_Mobile+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_2_Access_to_terms_of_service_Prepaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2890321,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.2 Access to terms of service - Postpaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_2_Access_to_terms_of_service_Postpaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1.2 Access to terms of service - Postpaid Mobile",
      "question": "Are the terms of service for the company’s postpaid mobile services available in the language(s) most commonly spoken by the company’s users?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect a company to take steps to help users understand the information presented in their documents.</p><p></p><p><strong>Note: </strong>Privacy policies are not included in this indicator since they are covered in separate indicators in the “Privacy” section.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Terms of Service </strong>– This document may also be called Terms of Use, Terms and Conditions, etc. The terms of service “often provide the necessary ground rules for how various online services should be used,” as stated by the EFF, and represent a legal agreement between the company and the user. Companies can take action against users and their content based on information in the terms of service.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.eff.org/issues/terms-of-abuse|Electronic Frontier Foundation, “Terms of (Ab)use”]]<br></p></li><li><p><strong>Easy to understand / understandable manner </strong>– The company has taken steps to help users actually understand the Terms of Service. This includes, but is not limited to, providing summaries, tips, or guidance that explain what the terms mean, using section headers, readable font size, or other graphic features to help users understand the document, or writing the terms using readable syntax.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company terms of service, terms of use, terms and conditions, etc.</p></li><li><p>Company acceptable use policy, community guidelines, rules, etc.</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Terms of Service",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.2 Access to terms of service - Postpaid Mobile+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_2_Access_to_terms_of_service_Postpaid_Mobile+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_2_Access_to_terms_of_service_Postpaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2890337,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.2 Access to terms of service - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_2_Access_to_terms_of_service_Fixed_Line_Broadband.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1.2 Access to terms of service - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "Are the terms of service for the company’s fixed line broadband services available in the language(s) most commonly spoken by the company’s users?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect a company to take steps to help users understand the information presented in their documents.</p><p></p><p><strong>Note: </strong>Privacy policies are not included in this indicator since they are covered in separate indicators in the “Privacy” section.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Terms of Service </strong>– This document may also be called Terms of Use, Terms and Conditions, etc. The terms of service “often provide the necessary ground rules for how various online services should be used,” as stated by the EFF, and represent a legal agreement between the company and the user. Companies can take action against users and their content based on information in the terms of service.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.eff.org/issues/terms-of-abuse|Electronic Frontier Foundation, “Terms of (Ab)use”]]<br></p></li><li><p><strong>Easy to understand / understandable manner </strong>– The company has taken steps to help users actually understand the Terms of Service. This includes, but is not limited to, providing summaries, tips, or guidance that explain what the terms mean, using section headers, readable font size, or other graphic features to help users understand the document, or writing the terms using readable syntax.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company terms of service, terms of use, terms and conditions, etc.</p></li><li><p>Company acceptable use policy, community guidelines, rules, etc.</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Terms of Service",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.2 Access to terms of service - Fixed Line Broadband+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_2_Access_to_terms_of_service_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_2_Access_to_terms_of_service_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891553,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.3 Access to terms of service - Prepaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_3_Access_to_terms_of_service_Prepaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1.3 Access to terms of service - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "Are the terms of service for prepaid mobile presented in an understandable manner?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect a company to take steps to help users understand the information presented in their documents. This includes, but is not limited to, providing summaries, tips, or guidance that explain what the terms mean, using section headers, readable font size, or other graphic features to help users understand the document, or writing the terms using readable syntax.</p><p>This indicator includes a review of other documents such as “community guidelines” or service-specific rules that further explain to users what the terms mean.</p><p></p><p><strong>Note:</strong> Privacy policies are not included in this indicator since they are covered in separate indicators in the “Privacy” section.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Terms of Service </strong>– This document may also be called Terms of Use, Terms and Conditions, etc. The terms of service “often provide the necessary ground rules for how various online services should be used,” as stated by the EFF, and represent a legal agreement between the company and the user. Companies can take action against users and their content based on information in the terms of service.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.eff.org/issues/terms-of-abuse|Electronic Frontier Foundation, “Terms of (Ab)use”]]<br></p></li><li><p><strong>Easy to understand / understandable manner </strong>– The company has taken steps to help users actually understand the Terms of Service. This includes, but is not limited to, providing summaries, tips, or guidance that explain what the terms mean, using section headers, readable font size, or other graphic features to help users understand the document, or writing the terms using readable syntax.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company terms of service, terms of use, terms and conditions, etc.</p></li><li><p>Company acceptable use policy, community guidelines, rules, etc.</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Terms of Service",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.3 Access to terms of service - Prepaid Mobile+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_3_Access_to_terms_of_service_Prepaid_Mobile+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_3_Access_to_terms_of_service_Prepaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891563,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.3 Access to terms of service - Postpaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_3_Access_to_terms_of_service_Postpaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1.3 Access to terms of service - Postpaid Mobile",
      "question": "Are the terms of service for postpaid mobile presented in an understandable manner?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect a company to take steps to help users understand the information presented in their documents. This includes, but is not limited to, providing summaries, tips, or guidance that explain what the terms mean, using section headers, readable font size, or other graphic features to help users understand the document, or writing the terms using readable syntax.</p><p>This indicator includes a review of other documents such as “community guidelines” or service-specific rules that further explain to users what the terms mean.</p><p></p><p><strong>Note:</strong> Privacy policies are not included in this indicator since they are covered in separate indicators in the “Privacy” section.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Terms of Service </strong>– This document may also be called Terms of Use, Terms and Conditions, etc. The terms of service “often provide the necessary ground rules for how various online services should be used,” as stated by the EFF, and represent a legal agreement between the company and the user. Companies can take action against users and their content based on information in the terms of service.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.eff.org/issues/terms-of-abuse|Electronic Frontier Foundation, “Terms of (Ab)use”]]<br></p></li><li><p><strong>Easy to understand / understandable manner </strong>– The company has taken steps to help users actually understand the Terms of Service. This includes, but is not limited to, providing summaries, tips, or guidance that explain what the terms mean, using section headers, readable font size, or other graphic features to help users understand the document, or writing the terms using readable syntax.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company terms of service, terms of use, terms and conditions, etc.</p></li><li><p>Company acceptable use policy, community guidelines, rules, etc.</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Terms of Service",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.3 Access to terms of service - Postpaid Mobile+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_3_Access_to_terms_of_service_Postpaid_Mobile+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_3_Access_to_terms_of_service_Postpaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891580,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.3 Access to terms of service - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_3_Access_to_terms_of_service_Fixed_Line_Broadband.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1.3 Access to terms of service - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "Are the terms of service for fixed line broadband presented in an understandable manner?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect a company to take steps to help users understand the information presented in their documents. This includes, but is not limited to, providing summaries, tips, or guidance that explain what the terms mean, using section headers, readable font size, or other graphic features to help users understand the document, or writing the terms using readable syntax.</p><p>This indicator includes a review of other documents such as “community guidelines” or service-specific rules that further explain to users what the terms mean.</p><p></p><p><strong>Note:</strong> Privacy policies are not included in this indicator since they are covered in separate indicators in the “Privacy” section.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Terms of Service </strong>– This document may also be called Terms of Use, Terms and Conditions, etc. The terms of service “often provide the necessary ground rules for how various online services should be used,” as stated by the EFF, and represent a legal agreement between the company and the user. Companies can take action against users and their content based on information in the terms of service.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.eff.org/issues/terms-of-abuse|Electronic Frontier Foundation, “Terms of (Ab)use”]]<br></p></li><li><p><strong>Easy to understand / understandable manner </strong>– The company has taken steps to help users actually understand the Terms of Service. This includes, but is not limited to, providing summaries, tips, or guidance that explain what the terms mean, using section headers, readable font size, or other graphic features to help users understand the document, or writing the terms using readable syntax.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company terms of service, terms of use, terms and conditions, etc.</p></li><li><p>Company acceptable use policy, community guidelines, rules, etc.</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Terms of Service",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.3 Access to terms of service - Fixed Line Broadband+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_3_Access_to_terms_of_service_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_3_Access_to_terms_of_service_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891590,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P1.1 Access to privacy policies - Prepaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P1_1_Access_to_privacy_policies_Prepaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P1.1 Access to privacy policies - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "Are the company’s privacy policies for prepaid mobile easy to find?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>Privacy policies address how companies collect, manage, use, and secure information about users as well as information provided by users. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate the policy and to make an effort to help users understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>A document that is “<strong>easy to find</strong>” should be located on the home page of the company or service, or at most, on a page that is one or two clicks away from the home page. <br></p><p><strong>In the comment to the metric value provide an explanation of where and how you found the document(s).</strong></p><p><br><strong>Note: </strong>Terms of Service are not included in this indicator since they are covered in separate indicators in the “Freedom of Expression” section.<br></p><p><strong>Defintion(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P1_1_Access_to_privacy_policies_Prepaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891601,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P1.1 Access to privacy policies - Postpaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P1_1_Access_to_privacy_policies_Postpaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P1.1 Access to privacy policies - Postpaid Mobile",
      "question": "Are the company’s privacy policies for postpaid mobile easy to find?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>Privacy policies address how companies collect, manage, use, and secure information about users as well as information provided by users. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate the policy and to make an effort to help users understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>A document that is “<strong>easy to find</strong>” should be located on the home page of the company or service, or at most, on a page that is one or two clicks away from the home page. <br></p><p><strong>In the comment to the metric value provide an explanation of where and how you found the document(s).</strong></p><p><br><strong>Note: </strong>Terms of Service are not included in this indicator since they are covered in separate indicators in the “Freedom of Expression” section.<br></p><p><strong>Defintion(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P1_1_Access_to_privacy_policies_Postpaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891608,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P1.1 Access to privacy policies - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P1_1_Access_to_privacy_policies_Fixed_Line_Broadband.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P1.1 Access to privacy policies - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "Are the company’s privacy policies for fixed line broadband easy to find?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>Privacy policies address how companies collect, manage, use, and secure information about users as well as information provided by users. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate the policy and to make an effort to help users understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>A document that is “<strong>easy to find</strong>” should be located on the home page of the company or service, or at most, on a page that is one or two clicks away from the home page. <br></p><p><strong>In the comment to the metric value provide an explanation of where and how you found the document(s).</strong></p><p><br><strong>Note: </strong>Terms of Service are not included in this indicator since they are covered in separate indicators in the “Freedom of Expression” section.<br></p><p><strong>Defintion(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P1_1_Access_to_privacy_policies_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891625,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P1.2 Access to privacy policies - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P1_2_Access_to_privacy_policies_Fixed_Line_Broadband.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P1.2 Access to privacy policies - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "Are the privacy policies for fixed line broadband available in the language(s) most commonly spoken by the company’s users?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>Privacy policies address how companies collect, manage, use, and secure information about users as well as information provided by users. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate the policy and to make an effort to help users understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect a company to take steps to help users understand the information presented in their documents.</p><p><strong>Note: </strong>Terms of Service are not included in this indicator since they are covered in separate indicators in the “Freedom of Expression” section.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users. </p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]<br></p></li><li><p><strong>Easy to understand / understandable manner </strong>– The company has taken steps to help users actually understand the Privacy Policies. This includes, but is not limited to, providing summaries, tips, or guidance that explain what the terms mean, using section headers, readable font size, or other graphic features to help users understand the document, or writing the terms using readable syntax.</p></li></ul><p></p><p><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P1_2_Access_to_privacy_policies_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891633,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P1.2 Access to privacy policies - Postpaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P1_2_Access_to_privacy_policies_Postpaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P1.2 Access to privacy policies - Postpaid Mobile",
      "question": "Are the privacy policies for postpaid mobile available in the language(s) most commonly spoken by the company’s users?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>Privacy policies address how companies collect, manage, use, and secure information about users as well as information provided by users. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate the policy and to make an effort to help users understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect a company to take steps to help users understand the information presented in their documents.</p><p><strong>Note: </strong>Terms of Service are not included in this indicator since they are covered in separate indicators in the “Freedom of Expression” section.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]<br></p></li><li><p><strong>Easy to understand / understandable manner </strong>– The company has taken steps to help users actually understand the Privacy Policies. This includes, but is not limited to, providing summaries, tips, or guidance that explain what the terms mean, using section headers, readable font size, or other graphic features to help users understand the document, or writing the terms using readable syntax.</p></li></ul><p></p><p><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P1_2_Access_to_privacy_policies_Postpaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891640,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P1.2 Access to privacy policies - Prepaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P1_2_Access_to_privacy_policies_Prepaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P1.2 Access to privacy policies - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "Are the privacy policies for prepaid mobile available in the language(s) most commonly spoken by the company’s users?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>Privacy policies address how companies collect, manage, use, and secure information about users as well as information provided by users. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate the policy and to make an effort to help users understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect a company to take steps to help users understand the information presented in their documents.</p><p><strong>Note: </strong>Terms of Service are not included in this indicator since they are covered in separate indicators in the “Freedom of Expression” section.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]<br></p></li><li><p><strong>Easy to understand / understandable manner </strong>– The company has taken steps to help users actually understand the Privacy Policies. This includes, but is not limited to, providing summaries, tips, or guidance that explain what the terms mean, using section headers, readable font size, or other graphic features to help users understand the document, or writing the terms using readable syntax.</p></li></ul><p></p><p><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P1_2_Access_to_privacy_policies_Prepaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891676,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P1.3 Access to privacy policies - Prepaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P1_3_Access_to_privacy_policies_Prepaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P1.3 Access to privacy policies - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "Are the policies for prepaid mobile presented in an understandable manner?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>Privacy policies address how companies collect, manage, use, and secure information about users as well as information provided by users. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate the policy and to make an effort to help users understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect a company to take steps to help users understand the information presented in their documents. This includes, but is not limited to, providing summaries, tips, or guidance that explain what the terms mean, using section headers, readable font size, or other graphic features to help users understand the document, or writing the terms using readable syntax. </p><p><strong>Note: </strong>Terms of Service are not included in this indicator since they are covered in separate indicators in the “Freedom of Expression” section.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]<br></p></li><li><p><strong>Easy to understand / understandable manner </strong>– The company has taken steps to help users actually understand the Privacy Policies. This includes, but is not limited to, providing summaries, tips, or guidance that explain what the terms mean, using section headers, readable font size, or other graphic features to help users understand the document, or writing the terms using readable syntax.</p></li></ul><p></p><p><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P1_3_Access_to_privacy_policies_Prepaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891683,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P1.3 Access to privacy policies - Postpaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P1_3_Access_to_privacy_policies_Postpaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P1.3 Access to privacy policies - Postpaid Mobile",
      "question": "Are the policies for postpaid mobile presented in an understandable manner?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>Privacy policies address how companies collect, manage, use, and secure information about users as well as information provided by users. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate the policy and to make an effort to help users understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect a company to take steps to help users understand the information presented in their documents. This includes, but is not limited to, providing summaries, tips, or guidance that explain what the terms mean, using section headers, readable font size, or other graphic features to help users understand the document, or writing the terms using readable syntax.</p><p><strong>Note: </strong>Terms of Service are not included in this indicator since they are covered in separate indicators in the “Freedom of Expression” section.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]<br></p></li><li><p><strong>Easy to understand / understandable manner </strong>– The company has taken steps to help users actually understand the Privacy Policies. This includes, but is not limited to, providing summaries, tips, or guidance that explain what the terms mean, using section headers, readable font size, or other graphic features to help users understand the document, or writing the terms using readable syntax.</p></li></ul><p></p><p><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P1_3_Access_to_privacy_policies_Postpaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891690,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P1.3 Access to privacy policies - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P1_3_Access_to_privacy_policies_Fixed_Line_Broadband.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P1.3 Access to privacy policies - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "Are the policies for fixed line broadband presented in an understandable manner?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>Privacy policies address how companies collect, manage, use, and secure information about users as well as information provided by users. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate the policy and to make an effort to help users understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect a company to take steps to help users understand the information presented in their documents. This includes, but is not limited to, providing summaries, tips, or guidance that explain what the terms mean, using section headers, readable font size, or other graphic features to help users understand the document, or writing the terms using readable syntax.</p><p><strong>Note: </strong>Terms of Service are not included in this indicator since they are covered in separate indicators in the “Freedom of Expression” section.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]<br></p></li><li><p><strong>Easy to understand / understandable manner </strong>– The company has taken steps to help users actually understand the Privacy Policies. This includes, but is not limited to, providing summaries, tips, or guidance that explain what the terms mean, using section headers, readable font size, or other graphic features to help users understand the document, or writing the terms using readable syntax.</p></li></ul><p></p><p><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P1_3_Access_to_privacy_policies_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891736,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P2.1 Changes to privacy policies - Prepaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_1_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Prepaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P2.1 Changes to privacy policies - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose that it notifies users about changes to its privacy policies for prepaid mobile?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] that it provides [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#notice|<strong>notice</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#documentation|<strong>documentation</strong>]] to users when it changes its [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]].<br><br>It is common for companies to change their privacy policies as their business evolves. However these changes can significantly impact a user’s privacy rights and what user information companies can collect, share and store. We therefore expect companies to commit to notify users when they change these policies and to provide users with information to help them understand what these changes mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric seeks clear disclosure by companies of whether they notify users about changes to privacy policies. <br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users. </p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]</p></li><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_1_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Prepaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891743,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P2.1 Changes to privacy policies - Postpaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_1_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Postpaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P2.1 Changes to privacy policies - Postpaid Mobile",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose that it notifies users about changes to its privacy policies for postpaid mobile?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] that it provides [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#notice|<strong>notice</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#documentation|<strong>documentation</strong>]] to users when it changes its [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]].<br><br>It is common for companies to change their privacy policies as their business evolves. However these changes can significantly impact a user’s privacy rights and what user information companies can collect, share and store. We therefore expect companies to commit to notify users when they change these policies and to provide users with information to help them understand what these changes mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric seeks clear disclosure by companies of whether they notify users about changes to privacy policies. <br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users. </p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]</p></li><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_1_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Postpaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891750,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P2.1 Changes to privacy policies - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_1_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Fixed_Line_Broadband.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P2.1 Changes to privacy policies - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose that it notifies users about changes to its privacy policies for fixed line broadband?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] that it provides [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#notice|<strong>notice</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#documentation|<strong>documentation</strong>]] to users when it changes its [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]].<br><br>It is common for companies to change their privacy policies as their business evolves. However these changes can significantly impact a user’s privacy rights and what user information companies can collect, share and store. We therefore expect companies to commit to notify users when they change these policies and to provide users with information to help them understand what these changes mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric seeks clear disclosure by companies of whether they notify users about changes to privacy policies. <br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users. </p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]</p></li><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_1_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891766,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P2.2 Changes to privacy policies - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_2_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Fixed_Line_Broadband.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P2.2 Changes to privacy policies - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose how it will directly notify fixed line broadband users of changes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] that it provides [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#notice|<strong>notice</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#documentation|<strong>documentation</strong>]] to users when it changes its [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]].<br><br>It is common for companies to change their privacy policies as their business evolves. However these changes can significantly impact a user’s privacy rights and what user information companies can collect, share and store. We therefore expect companies to commit to notify users when they change these policies and to provide users with information to help them understand what these changes mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric seeks clear disclosure by companies of their <em>direct</em> method for notifying users about changes to privacy policies. <br><br>We expect companies to commit to directly notifying users prior to changes coming into effect. The method of direct notification may differ based on the type of service. For services that contain user accounts, direct notification may involve sending an email or an SMS. For services that do not require a user account, direct notification may involve posting a prominent notice on the main page where users access the service.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]</p></li><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_2_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891773,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P2.2 Changes to privacy policies - Postpaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_2_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Postpaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P2.2 Changes to privacy policies - Postpaid Mobile",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose how it will directly notify postpaid mobile users of changes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] that it provides [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#notice|<strong>notice</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#documentation|<strong>documentation</strong>]] to users when it changes its [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]].<br><br>It is common for companies to change their privacy policies as their business evolves. However these changes can significantly impact a user’s privacy rights and what user information companies can collect, share and store. We therefore expect companies to commit to notify users when they change these policies and to provide users with information to help them understand what these changes mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric seeks clear disclosure by companies of their <em>direct</em> method for notifying users about changes to privacy policies. <br><br>We expect companies to commit to directly notifying users prior to changes coming into effect. The method of direct notification may differ based on the type of service. For services that contain user accounts, direct notification may involve sending an email or an SMS. For services that do not require a user account, direct notification may involve posting a prominent notice on the main page where users access the service.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]</p></li><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_2_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Postpaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891780,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P2.2 Changes to privacy policies - Prepaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_2_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Prepaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P2.2 Changes to privacy policies - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose how it will directly notify prepaid mobile users of changes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] that it provides [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#notice|<strong>notice</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#documentation|<strong>documentation</strong>]] to users when it changes its [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]].<br><br>It is common for companies to change their privacy policies as their business evolves. However these changes can significantly impact a user’s privacy rights and what user information companies can collect, share and store. We therefore expect companies to commit to notify users when they change these policies and to provide users with information to help them understand what these changes mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric seeks clear disclosure by companies of their <em>direct</em> method for notifying users about changes to privacy policies. <br><br>We expect companies to commit to directly notifying users prior to changes coming into effect. The method of direct notification may differ based on the type of service. For services that contain user accounts, direct notification may involve sending an email or an SMS. For services that do not require a user account, direct notification may involve posting a prominent notice on the main page where users access the service.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]</p></li><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_2_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Prepaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891859,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P2.3 Changes to privacy policies - Prepaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_3_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Prepaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P2.3 Changes to privacy policies - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose the timeframe within which it provides notification prior to changes coming into effect for prepaid mobile?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] that it provides [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#notice|<strong>notice</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#documentation|<strong>documentation</strong>]] to users when it changes its [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]].<br><br>It is common for companies to change their privacy policies as their business evolves. However these changes can significantly impact a user’s privacy rights and what user information companies can collect, share and store. We therefore expect companies to commit to notify users when they change these policies and to provide users with information to help them understand what these changes mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric seeks clear disclosure by companies of their timeframe for notifying users about changes to privacy policies. <br><br><br><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users. </p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]</p></li><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_3_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Prepaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891866,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P2.3 Changes to privacy policies - Postpaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_3_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Postpaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P2.3 Changes to privacy policies - Postpaid Mobile",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose the timeframe within which it provides notification prior to changes coming into effect for postpaid mobile?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] that it provides [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#notice|<strong>notice</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#documentation|<strong>documentation</strong>]] to users when it changes its [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]].<br><br>It is common for companies to change their privacy policies as their business evolves. However these changes can significantly impact a user’s privacy rights and what user information companies can collect, share and store. We therefore expect companies to commit to notify users when they change these policies and to provide users with information to help them understand what these changes mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric seeks clear disclosure by companies of their timeframe for notifying users about changes to privacy policies. <br><br><br><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users. </p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]</p></li><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_3_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Postpaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891873,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P2.3 Changes to privacy policies - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_3_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Fixed_Line_Broadband.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P2.3 Changes to privacy policies - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose the timeframe within which it provides notification prior to changes coming into effect for fixed line broadband?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] that it provides [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#notice|<strong>notice</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#documentation|<strong>documentation</strong>]] to users when it changes its [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]].<br><br>It is common for companies to change their privacy policies as their business evolves. However these changes can significantly impact a user’s privacy rights and what user information companies can collect, share and store. We therefore expect companies to commit to notify users when they change these policies and to provide users with information to help them understand what these changes mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric seeks clear disclosure by companies of their timeframe for notifying users about changes to privacy policies. <br><br><br><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users. </p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]</p></li><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_3_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891889,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P2.4 Changes to privacy policies - Prepaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_4_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Prepaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P2.4 Changes to privacy policies - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "Does the company maintain a public archive or change log for prepaid mobile?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] that it provides [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#notice|<strong>notice</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#documentation|<strong>documentation</strong>]] to users when it changes its [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]].<br><br>It is common for companies to change their privacy policies as their business evolves. However these changes can significantly impact a user’s privacy rights and what user information companies can collect, share and store. We therefore expect companies to commit to notify users when they change these policies and to provide users with information to help them understand what these changes mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric seeks evidence that a company provides publicly available records of previous policies so that people can understand how the company’s policies have evolved over time. <br><br><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]</p></li><li><p><strong>Public archive </strong>– A publicly available resource that contains previous versions of the terms of service or comprehensively explains each round of changes the company makes to its terms of service.</p></li><li><p><strong>Change log </strong>— A record that depicts the specific changes in a document, in this case, a terms of service document.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_4_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Prepaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891896,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P2.4 Changes to privacy policies - Postpaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_4_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Postpaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P2.4 Changes to privacy policies - Postpaid Mobile",
      "question": "Does the company maintain a public archive or change log for postpaid mobile?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] that it provides [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#notice|<strong>notice</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#documentation|<strong>documentation</strong>]] to users when it changes its [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]].<br><br>It is common for companies to change their privacy policies as their business evolves. However these changes can significantly impact a user’s privacy rights and what user information companies can collect, share and store. We therefore expect companies to commit to notify users when they change these policies and to provide users with information to help them understand what these changes mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric seeks evidence that a company provides publicly available records of previous policies so that people can understand how the company’s policies have evolved over time. <br><br><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]</p></li><li><p><strong>Public archive </strong>– A publicly available resource that contains previous versions of the terms of service or comprehensively explains each round of changes the company makes to its terms of service.</p></li><li><p><strong>Change log </strong>— A record that depicts the specific changes in a document, in this case, a terms of service document.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_4_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Postpaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891903,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P2.4 Changes to privacy policies - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_4_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Fixed_Line_Broadband.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P2.4 Changes to privacy policies - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "Does the company maintain a public archive or change log for fixed line broadband?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] that it provides [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#notice|<strong>notice</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#documentation|<strong>documentation</strong>]] to users when it changes its [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#privacypolicy|<strong>privacy policies</strong>]].<br><br>It is common for companies to change their privacy policies as their business evolves. However these changes can significantly impact a user’s privacy rights and what user information companies can collect, share and store. We therefore expect companies to commit to notify users when they change these policies and to provide users with information to help them understand what these changes mean.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric seeks evidence that a company provides publicly available records of previous policies so that people can understand how the company’s policies have evolved over time. <br><br><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Privacy policies </strong>– Documents that outline a company’s practices involving the collection and use of information, especially information about users.</p><p>Source: [[https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf|“Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers,” U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2012, p. 77.]]</p></li><li><p><strong>Public archive </strong>– A publicly available resource that contains previous versions of the terms of service or comprehensively explains each round of changes the company makes to its terms of service.</p></li><li><p><strong>Change log </strong>— A record that depicts the specific changes in a document, in this case, a terms of service document.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company data use policy</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P2_4_Changes_to_privacy_policies_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2891995,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P3.1 Collection of user information - Prepaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P3_1_Collection_of_user_information_Prepaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P3.1 Collection of user information - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose what types of user information it collects from prepaid mobile customers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] what [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#userinformation|<strong>user information</strong>]] it [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#collect|<strong>collects</strong>]] and how.<br><br>Companies collect a wide range of personal information from users—from personal details and account profiles to a user’s activities and location.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect companies to <strong>clearly disclose</strong> <em>what types</em> of <strong>user information</strong> (as RDR defines it) they <strong>collect</strong>.</p><p><strong>Note:</strong> In some cases, laws or regulations might require companies to collect certain information or might prohibit or discourage the company from disclosing what user information they collect. Researchers should document situations where this is the case, but a company will still lose points if it fails to meet all elements. This represents a situation where the law causes companies to be uncompetitive, and we encourage companies to advocate for laws that enable them to fully respect users’ rights to freedom of expression and privacy.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li><li><p><strong>Collect / Collection</strong>– All means by which a company may gather information about users. For example, a company may collect this information directly in a range of situations, including when users upload content for public sharing, submit phone numbers for account verification, transmit personal information in private conversation with one another, etc. A company may also collect this information indirectly, for example, by recording log data, account information, metadata, and other related information that describes users and/or documents their activities.</p></li><li><p><strong>User information</strong>— Any data that is connected to an identifiable person, or may be connected to such a person by combining datasets or utilizing data-mining techniques. As further explanation, user Information is any data that documents a user’s characteristics and/or activities. This information may or may not be tied to a specific user account. This information includes, but is not limited to, personal correspondence, user-generated content, account preferences and settings, log and access data, data about a user’s activities or preferences collected from third parties either through behavioral tracking or purchasing of data, and all forms of metadata. User Information is never considered anonymous except when included solely as a basis to generate global measures (e.g. number of active monthly users). For example, the statement, ‘Our service has 1 million monthly active users,’ contains anonymous data, since it does not give enough information to know who those 1 million users are.</p></li><li><p><strong>Anonymous data</strong> is “data that is in no way connected to another piece of information that could enable a user to be identified.”</p><p>This expansive view is necessary to reflect several facts. First, skilled analysts can de-anonymize large data sets. This renders nearly all promises of anonymization unattainable. In essence, any data tied to an “anonymous identifier” is not anonymous; rather, this is often pseudonymous data that may be tied back to the user’s offline identity. Second, metadata may be as or more revealing of a user’s associations and interests than content data, thus this data is of vital interest. Third, entities that have access to many sources of data, such as data brokers and governments, may be able to pair two or more data sources to reveal information about users. Thus, sophisticated actors can use data that seems anonymous to construct a larger picture of a user.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company webpage or section on data protection or data collection</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P3_1_Collection_of_user_information_Prepaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2892005,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P3.1 Collection of user information - Postpaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P3_1_Collection_of_user_information_Postpaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P3.1 Collection of user information - Postpaid Mobile",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose what types of user information it collects from postpaid mobile customers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] what [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#userinformation|<strong>user information</strong>]] it [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#collect|<strong>collects</strong>]] and how.<br><br>Companies collect a wide range of personal information from users—from personal details and account profiles to a user’s activities and location.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect companies to <strong>clearly disclose</strong> <em>what types</em> of <strong>user information</strong> (as RDR defines it) they <strong>collect</strong>.</p><p><strong>Note:</strong> In some cases, laws or regulations might require companies to collect certain information or might prohibit or discourage the company from disclosing what user information they collect. Researchers should document situations where this is the case, but a company will still lose points if it fails to meet all elements. This represents a situation where the law causes companies to be uncompetitive, and we encourage companies to advocate for laws that enable them to fully respect users’ rights to freedom of expression and privacy.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li><li><p><strong>Collect / Collection</strong>– All means by which a company may gather information about users. For example, a company may collect this information directly in a range of situations, including when users upload content for public sharing, submit phone numbers for account verification, transmit personal information in private conversation with one another, etc. A company may also collect this information indirectly, for example, by recording log data, account information, metadata, and other related information that describes users and/or documents their activities.</p></li><li><p><strong>User information</strong>— Any data that is connected to an identifiable person, or may be connected to such a person by combining datasets or utilizing data-mining techniques. As further explanation, user Information is any data that documents a user’s characteristics and/or activities. This information may or may not be tied to a specific user account. This information includes, but is not limited to, personal correspondence, user-generated content, account preferences and settings, log and access data, data about a user’s activities or preferences collected from third parties either through behavioral tracking or purchasing of data, and all forms of metadata. User Information is never considered anonymous except when included solely as a basis to generate global measures (e.g. number of active monthly users). For example, the statement, ‘Our service has 1 million monthly active users,’ contains anonymous data, since it does not give enough information to know who those 1 million users are.</p></li><li><p><strong>Anonymous data</strong> is “data that is in no way connected to another piece of information that could enable a user to be identified.”</p><p>This expansive view is necessary to reflect several facts. First, skilled analysts can de-anonymize large data sets. This renders nearly all promises of anonymization unattainable. In essence, any data tied to an “anonymous identifier” is not anonymous; rather, this is often pseudonymous data that may be tied back to the user’s offline identity. Second, metadata may be as or more revealing of a user’s associations and interests than content data, thus this data is of vital interest. Third, entities that have access to many sources of data, such as data brokers and governments, may be able to pair two or more data sources to reveal information about users. Thus, sophisticated actors can use data that seems anonymous to construct a larger picture of a user.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company webpage or section on data protection or data collection</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P3_1_Collection_of_user_information_Postpaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2892012,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P3.1 Collection of user information - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P3_1_Collection_of_user_information_Fixed_Line_Broadband.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P3.1 Collection of user information - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose what types of user information it collects from fixed line broadband customers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] what [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#userinformation|<strong>user information</strong>]] it [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#collect|<strong>collects</strong>]] and how.<br><br>Companies collect a wide range of personal information from users—from personal details and account profiles to a user’s activities and location.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect companies to <strong>clearly disclose</strong> <em>what types</em> of <strong>user information</strong> (as RDR defines it) they <strong>collect</strong>.</p><p><strong>Note:</strong> In some cases, laws or regulations might require companies to collect certain information or might prohibit or discourage the company from disclosing what user information they collect. Researchers should document situations where this is the case, but a company will still lose points if it fails to meet all elements. This represents a situation where the law causes companies to be uncompetitive, and we encourage companies to advocate for laws that enable them to fully respect users’ rights to freedom of expression and privacy.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li><li><p><strong>Collect / Collection</strong>– All means by which a company may gather information about users. For example, a company may collect this information directly in a range of situations, including when users upload content for public sharing, submit phone numbers for account verification, transmit personal information in private conversation with one another, etc. A company may also collect this information indirectly, for example, by recording log data, account information, metadata, and other related information that describes users and/or documents their activities.</p></li><li><p><strong>User information</strong>— Any data that is connected to an identifiable person, or may be connected to such a person by combining datasets or utilizing data-mining techniques. As further explanation, user Information is any data that documents a user’s characteristics and/or activities. This information may or may not be tied to a specific user account. This information includes, but is not limited to, personal correspondence, user-generated content, account preferences and settings, log and access data, data about a user’s activities or preferences collected from third parties either through behavioral tracking or purchasing of data, and all forms of metadata. User Information is never considered anonymous except when included solely as a basis to generate global measures (e.g. number of active monthly users). For example, the statement, ‘Our service has 1 million monthly active users,’ contains anonymous data, since it does not give enough information to know who those 1 million users are.</p></li><li><p><strong>Anonymous data</strong> is “data that is in no way connected to another piece of information that could enable a user to be identified.”</p><p>This expansive view is necessary to reflect several facts. First, skilled analysts can de-anonymize large data sets. This renders nearly all promises of anonymization unattainable. In essence, any data tied to an “anonymous identifier” is not anonymous; rather, this is often pseudonymous data that may be tied back to the user’s offline identity. Second, metadata may be as or more revealing of a user’s associations and interests than content data, thus this data is of vital interest. Third, entities that have access to many sources of data, such as data brokers and governments, may be able to pair two or more data sources to reveal information about users. Thus, sophisticated actors can use data that seems anonymous to construct a larger picture of a user.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company webpage or section on data protection or data collection</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P3_1_Collection_of_user_information_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2892045,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P3.2 Collection of user information - Prepaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P3_2_Collection_of_user_information_Prepaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P3.2 Collection of user information - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "For each type of user information the company collects from prepaid mobile users, does the company clearly disclose how it collects that user information?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] what [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#userinformation|<strong>user information</strong>]] it [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#collect|<strong>collects</strong>]] and how.<br><br>Companies collect a wide range of personal information from users—from personal details and account profiles to a user’s activities and location.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect companies to <strong>clearly disclose</strong> <em>how</em> they <strong>collect user information</strong> (as RDR defines it). If companies collect multiple types of information, we expect them to provide detail on how they handle each type of information.</p><p><strong>Note:</strong> In some cases, laws or regulations might require companies to collect certain information or might prohibit or discourage the company from disclosing what user information they collect. Researchers will document situations where this is the case, but a company will still lose points if it fails to meet all elements. This represents a situation where the law causes companies to be uncompetitive, and we encourage companies to advocate for laws that enable them to fully respect users’ rights to freedom of expression and privacy.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li><li><p><strong>Collect / Collection</strong>– All means by which a company may gather information about users. For example, a company may collect this information directly in a range of situations, including when users upload content for public sharing, submit phone numbers for account verification, transmit personal information in private conversation with one another, etc. A company may also collect this information indirectly, for example, by recording log data, account information, metadata, and other related information that describes users and/or documents their activities.</p></li><li><p><strong>User information</strong>— Any data that is connected to an identifiable person, or may be connected to such a person by combining datasets or utilizing data-mining techniques. As further explanation, user Information is any data that documents a user’s characteristics and/or activities. This information may or may not be tied to a specific user account. This information includes, but is not limited to, personal correspondence, user-generated content, account preferences and settings, log and access data, data about a user’s activities or preferences collected from third parties either through behavioral tracking or purchasing of data, and all forms of metadata. User Information is never considered anonymous except when included solely as a basis to generate global measures (e.g. number of active monthly users). For example, the statement, ‘Our service has 1 million monthly active users,’ contains anonymous data, since it does not give enough information to know who those 1 million users are.</p></li><li><p><strong>Anonymous data</strong> is “data that is in no way connected to another piece of information that could enable a user to be identified.”</p><p>This expansive view is necessary to reflect several facts. First, skilled analysts can de-anonymize large data sets. This renders nearly all promises of anonymization unattainable. In essence, any data tied to an “anonymous identifier” is not anonymous; rather, this is often pseudonymous data that may be tied back to the user’s offline identity. Second, metadata may be as or more revealing of a user’s associations and interests than content data, thus this data is of vital interest. Third, entities that have access to many sources of data, such as data brokers and governments, may be able to pair two or more data sources to reveal information about users. Thus, sophisticated actors can use data that seems anonymous to construct a larger picture of a user.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company webpage or section on data protection or data collection</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P3_2_Collection_of_user_information_Prepaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2892052,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P3.2 Collection of user information - Postpaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P3_2_Collection_of_user_information_Postpaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P3.2 Collection of user information - Postpaid Mobile",
      "question": "For each type of user information the company collects from postpaid mobile users, does the company clearly disclose how it collects that user information?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] what [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#userinformation|<strong>user information</strong>]] it [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#collect|<strong>collects</strong>]] and how.<br><br>Companies collect a wide range of personal information from users—from personal details and account profiles to a user’s activities and location.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect companies to <strong>clearly disclose</strong> <em>how</em> they <strong>collect user information</strong> (as RDR defines it). If companies collect multiple types of information, we expect them to provide detail on how they handle each type of information.</p><p><strong>Note:</strong> In some cases, laws or regulations might require companies to collect certain information or might prohibit or discourage the company from disclosing what user information they collect. Researchers will document situations where this is the case, but a company will still lose points if it fails to meet all elements. This represents a situation where the law causes companies to be uncompetitive, and we encourage companies to advocate for laws that enable them to fully respect users’ rights to freedom of expression and privacy.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li><li><p><strong>Collect / Collection</strong>– All means by which a company may gather information about users. For example, a company may collect this information directly in a range of situations, including when users upload content for public sharing, submit phone numbers for account verification, transmit personal information in private conversation with one another, etc. A company may also collect this information indirectly, for example, by recording log data, account information, metadata, and other related information that describes users and/or documents their activities.</p></li><li><p><strong>User information</strong>— Any data that is connected to an identifiable person, or may be connected to such a person by combining datasets or utilizing data-mining techniques. As further explanation, user Information is any data that documents a user’s characteristics and/or activities. This information may or may not be tied to a specific user account. This information includes, but is not limited to, personal correspondence, user-generated content, account preferences and settings, log and access data, data about a user’s activities or preferences collected from third parties either through behavioral tracking or purchasing of data, and all forms of metadata. User Information is never considered anonymous except when included solely as a basis to generate global measures (e.g. number of active monthly users). For example, the statement, ‘Our service has 1 million monthly active users,’ contains anonymous data, since it does not give enough information to know who those 1 million users are.</p></li><li><p><strong>Anonymous data</strong> is “data that is in no way connected to another piece of information that could enable a user to be identified.”</p><p>This expansive view is necessary to reflect several facts. First, skilled analysts can de-anonymize large data sets. This renders nearly all promises of anonymization unattainable. In essence, any data tied to an “anonymous identifier” is not anonymous; rather, this is often pseudonymous data that may be tied back to the user’s offline identity. Second, metadata may be as or more revealing of a user’s associations and interests than content data, thus this data is of vital interest. Third, entities that have access to many sources of data, such as data brokers and governments, may be able to pair two or more data sources to reveal information about users. Thus, sophisticated actors can use data that seems anonymous to construct a larger picture of a user.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company webpage or section on data protection or data collection</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P3_2_Collection_of_user_information_Postpaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2892059,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P3.2 Collection of user information - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P3_2_Collection_of_user_information_Fixed_Line_Broadband.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P3.2 Collection of user information - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "For each type of user information the company collects from fixed line broadband users, does the company clearly disclose how it collects that user information?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] what [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#userinformation|<strong>user information</strong>]] it [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#collect|<strong>collects</strong>]] and how.<br><br>Companies collect a wide range of personal information from users—from personal details and account profiles to a user’s activities and location.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect companies to <strong>clearly disclose</strong> <em>how</em> they <strong>collect user information</strong> (as RDR defines it). If companies collect multiple types of information, we expect them to provide detail on how they handle each type of information.</p><p><strong>Note:</strong> In some cases, laws or regulations might require companies to collect certain information or might prohibit or discourage the company from disclosing what user information they collect. Researchers will document situations where this is the case, but a company will still lose points if it fails to meet all elements. This represents a situation where the law causes companies to be uncompetitive, and we encourage companies to advocate for laws that enable them to fully respect users’ rights to freedom of expression and privacy.<br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li><li><p><strong>Collect / Collection</strong>– All means by which a company may gather information about users. For example, a company may collect this information directly in a range of situations, including when users upload content for public sharing, submit phone numbers for account verification, transmit personal information in private conversation with one another, etc. A company may also collect this information indirectly, for example, by recording log data, account information, metadata, and other related information that describes users and/or documents their activities.</p></li><li><p><strong>User information</strong>— Any data that is connected to an identifiable person, or may be connected to such a person by combining datasets or utilizing data-mining techniques. As further explanation, user Information is any data that documents a user’s characteristics and/or activities. This information may or may not be tied to a specific user account. This information includes, but is not limited to, personal correspondence, user-generated content, account preferences and settings, log and access data, data about a user’s activities or preferences collected from third parties either through behavioral tracking or purchasing of data, and all forms of metadata. User Information is never considered anonymous except when included solely as a basis to generate global measures (e.g. number of active monthly users). For example, the statement, ‘Our service has 1 million monthly active users,’ contains anonymous data, since it does not give enough information to know who those 1 million users are.</p></li><li><p><strong>Anonymous data</strong> is “data that is in no way connected to another piece of information that could enable a user to be identified.”</p><p>This expansive view is necessary to reflect several facts. First, skilled analysts can de-anonymize large data sets. This renders nearly all promises of anonymization unattainable. In essence, any data tied to an “anonymous identifier” is not anonymous; rather, this is often pseudonymous data that may be tied back to the user’s offline identity. Second, metadata may be as or more revealing of a user’s associations and interests than content data, thus this data is of vital interest. Third, entities that have access to many sources of data, such as data brokers and governments, may be able to pair two or more data sources to reveal information about users. Thus, sophisticated actors can use data that seems anonymous to construct a larger picture of a user.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company webpage or section on data protection or data collection</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P3_2_Collection_of_user_information_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2892076,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P3.3 Collection of user information - Prepaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P3_3_Collection_of_user_information_Prepaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P3.3 Collection of user information - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose that it limits collection of user information to what is directly relevant and necessary to accomplish the purpose of its prepaid mobile service?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] what [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#userinformation|<strong>user information</strong>]] it [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#collect|<strong>collects</strong>]] and how.<br><br>Companies collect a wide range of personal information from users—from personal details and account profiles to a user’s activities and location.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect companies to commit to the principle of <strong>data minimization</strong> and to demonstrate how this principle shapes their practices regarding <strong>user information</strong>. If companies collect multiple types of information, we expect them to provide detail on how they handle each type of information.</p><p><strong>Note:</strong> In some cases, laws or regulations might require companies to collect certain information or might prohibit or discourage the company from disclosing what user information they collect. Researchers will document situations where this is the case, but a company will still lose points if it fails to meet all elements. This represents a situation where the law causes companies to be uncompetitive, and we encourage companies to advocate for laws that enable them to fully respect users’ rights to freedom of expression and privacy.<br><br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li><li><p><strong>Collect / Collection </strong>– All means by which a company may gather information about users. For example, a company may collect this information directly in a range of situations, including when users upload content for public sharing, submit phone numbers for account verification, transmit personal information in private conversation with one another, etc. A company may also collect this information indirectly, for example, by recording log data, account information, metadata, and other related information that describes users and/or documents their activities.</p></li><li><p><strong>Data minimization – </strong>According to the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), “The principle of ‘data minimization’ means that a data controller [“the institution or body that determines the purposes and means of the processing of personal data”] should limit the collection of personal information to what is directly relevant and necessary to accomplish a specified purpose. They should also retain the data only for as long as is necessary to fulfil that purpose. In other words, data controllers should collect only the personal data they really need, and should keep it only for as long as they need it.”</p><p>Source: [[https://secure.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/edps/site/mySite/pid/74|European Data Protection Supervisor, Data Protection Glossary]]</p></li><li><p><strong>User information</strong>— Any data that is connected to an identifiable person, or may be connected to such a person by combining datasets or utilizing data-mining techniques. As further explanation, user Information is any data that documents a user’s characteristics and/or activities. This information may or may not be tied to a specific user account. This information includes, but is not limited to, personal correspondence, user-generated content, account preferences and settings, log and access data, data about a user’s activities or preferences collected from third parties either through behavioral tracking or purchasing of data, and all forms of metadata. User Information is never considered anonymous except when included solely as a basis to generate global measures (e.g. number of active monthly users). For example, the statement, ‘Our service has 1 million monthly active users,’ contains anonymous data, since it does not give enough information to know who those 1 million users are.</p></li><li><p><strong>Anonymous data</strong> is “data that is in no way connected to another piece of information that could enable a user to be identified.”</p><p>This expansive view is necessary to reflect several facts. First, skilled analysts can de-anonymize large data sets. This renders nearly all promises of anonymization unattainable. In essence, any data tied to an “anonymous identifier” is not anonymous; rather, this is often pseudonymous data that may be tied back to the user’s offline identity. Second, metadata may be as or more revealing of a user’s associations and interests than content data, thus this data is of vital interest. Third, entities that have access to many sources of data, such as data brokers and governments, may be able to pair two or more data sources to reveal information about users. Thus, sophisticated actors can use data that seems anonymous to construct a larger picture of a user.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company webpage or section on data protection or data collection</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P3_3_Collection_of_user_information_Prepaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2892083,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P3.3 Collection of user information - Postpaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P3_3_Collection_of_user_information_Postpaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P3.3 Collection of user information - Postpaid Mobile",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose that it limits collection of user information to what is directly relevant and necessary to accomplish the purpose of its postpaid mobile service?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] what [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#userinformation|<strong>user information</strong>]] it [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#collect|<strong>collects</strong>]] and how.<br><br>Companies collect a wide range of personal information from users—from personal details and account profiles to a user’s activities and location.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect companies to commit to the principle of <strong>data minimization</strong> and to demonstrate how this principle shapes their practices regarding <strong>user information</strong>. If companies collect multiple types of information, we expect them to provide detail on how they handle each type of information.</p><p><strong>Note:</strong> In some cases, laws or regulations might require companies to collect certain information or might prohibit or discourage the company from disclosing what user information they collect. Researchers will document situations where this is the case, but a company will still lose points if it fails to meet all elements. This represents a situation where the law causes companies to be uncompetitive, and we encourage companies to advocate for laws that enable them to fully respect users’ rights to freedom of expression and privacy.<br><br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li><li><p><strong>Collect / Collection </strong>– All means by which a company may gather information about users. For example, a company may collect this information directly in a range of situations, including when users upload content for public sharing, submit phone numbers for account verification, transmit personal information in private conversation with one another, etc. A company may also collect this information indirectly, for example, by recording log data, account information, metadata, and other related information that describes users and/or documents their activities.</p></li><li><p><strong>Data minimization – </strong>According to the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), “The principle of ‘data minimization’ means that a data controller [“the institution or body that determines the purposes and means of the processing of personal data”] should limit the collection of personal information to what is directly relevant and necessary to accomplish a specified purpose. They should also retain the data only for as long as is necessary to fulfil that purpose. In other words, data controllers should collect only the personal data they really need, and should keep it only for as long as they need it.”</p><p>Source: [[https://secure.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/edps/site/mySite/pid/74|European Data Protection Supervisor, Data Protection Glossary]]</p></li><li><p><strong>User information</strong>— Any data that is connected to an identifiable person, or may be connected to such a person by combining datasets or utilizing data-mining techniques. As further explanation, user Information is any data that documents a user’s characteristics and/or activities. This information may or may not be tied to a specific user account. This information includes, but is not limited to, personal correspondence, user-generated content, account preferences and settings, log and access data, data about a user’s activities or preferences collected from third parties either through behavioral tracking or purchasing of data, and all forms of metadata. User Information is never considered anonymous except when included solely as a basis to generate global measures (e.g. number of active monthly users). For example, the statement, ‘Our service has 1 million monthly active users,’ contains anonymous data, since it does not give enough information to know who those 1 million users are.</p></li><li><p><strong>Anonymous data</strong> is “data that is in no way connected to another piece of information that could enable a user to be identified.”</p><p>This expansive view is necessary to reflect several facts. First, skilled analysts can de-anonymize large data sets. This renders nearly all promises of anonymization unattainable. In essence, any data tied to an “anonymous identifier” is not anonymous; rather, this is often pseudonymous data that may be tied back to the user’s offline identity. Second, metadata may be as or more revealing of a user’s associations and interests than content data, thus this data is of vital interest. Third, entities that have access to many sources of data, such as data brokers and governments, may be able to pair two or more data sources to reveal information about users. Thus, sophisticated actors can use data that seems anonymous to construct a larger picture of a user.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company webpage or section on data protection or data collection</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P3_3_Collection_of_user_information_Postpaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2892090,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P3.3 Collection of user information - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P3_3_Collection_of_user_information_Fixed_Line_Broadband.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P3.3 Collection of user information - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose that it limits collection of user information to what is directly relevant and necessary to accomplish the purpose of its fixed line broadband service?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#clearlydisclose|<strong>clearly disclose</strong>]] what [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#userinformation|<strong>user information</strong>]] it [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#collect|<strong>collects</strong>]] and how.<br><br>Companies collect a wide range of personal information from users—from personal details and account profiles to a user’s activities and location.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We expect companies to commit to the principle of <strong>data minimization</strong> and to demonstrate how this principle shapes their practices regarding <strong>user information</strong>. If companies collect multiple types of information, we expect them to provide detail on how they handle each type of information.</p><p><strong>Note:</strong> In some cases, laws or regulations might require companies to collect certain information or might prohibit or discourage the company from disclosing what user information they collect. Researchers will document situations where this is the case, but a company will still lose points if it fails to meet all elements. This represents a situation where the law causes companies to be uncompetitive, and we encourage companies to advocate for laws that enable them to fully respect users’ rights to freedom of expression and privacy.<br><br></p><p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li><li><p><strong>Collect / Collection </strong>– All means by which a company may gather information about users. For example, a company may collect this information directly in a range of situations, including when users upload content for public sharing, submit phone numbers for account verification, transmit personal information in private conversation with one another, etc. A company may also collect this information indirectly, for example, by recording log data, account information, metadata, and other related information that describes users and/or documents their activities.</p></li><li><p><strong>Data minimization – </strong>According to the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), “The principle of ‘data minimization’ means that a data controller [“the institution or body that determines the purposes and means of the processing of personal data”] should limit the collection of personal information to what is directly relevant and necessary to accomplish a specified purpose. They should also retain the data only for as long as is necessary to fulfil that purpose. In other words, data controllers should collect only the personal data they really need, and should keep it only for as long as they need it.”</p><p>Source: [[https://secure.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/edps/site/mySite/pid/74|European Data Protection Supervisor, Data Protection Glossary]]</p></li><li><p><strong>User information</strong>— Any data that is connected to an identifiable person, or may be connected to such a person by combining datasets or utilizing data-mining techniques. As further explanation, user Information is any data that documents a user’s characteristics and/or activities. This information may or may not be tied to a specific user account. This information includes, but is not limited to, personal correspondence, user-generated content, account preferences and settings, log and access data, data about a user’s activities or preferences collected from third parties either through behavioral tracking or purchasing of data, and all forms of metadata. User Information is never considered anonymous except when included solely as a basis to generate global measures (e.g. number of active monthly users). For example, the statement, ‘Our service has 1 million monthly active users,’ contains anonymous data, since it does not give enough information to know who those 1 million users are.</p></li><li><p><strong>Anonymous data</strong> is “data that is in no way connected to another piece of information that could enable a user to be identified.”</p><p>This expansive view is necessary to reflect several facts. First, skilled analysts can de-anonymize large data sets. This renders nearly all promises of anonymization unattainable. In essence, any data tied to an “anonymous identifier” is not anonymous; rather, this is often pseudonymous data that may be tied back to the user’s offline identity. Second, metadata may be as or more revealing of a user’s associations and interests than content data, thus this data is of vital interest. Third, entities that have access to many sources of data, such as data brokers and governments, may be able to pair two or more data sources to reveal information about users. Thus, sophisticated actors can use data that seems anonymous to construct a larger picture of a user.</p></li></ul><p><br><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company privacy policy</p></li><li><p>Company webpage or section on data protection or data collection</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P3_3_Collection_of_user_information_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2892106,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P15.1 Data breaches - Prepaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P15_1_Data_breaches_Prepaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P15.1 Data breaches - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose to prepaid mobile users that it will notify the relevant authorities without undue delay when a data breach occurs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should publicly disclose information about its processes for responding to [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#databreach|<strong>data breaches</strong>]]. <br><br>When the security of users’ data has been compromised due to a data breach, companies should have clearly disclosed processes in place for addressing the security threat and for notifying affected users. Given that data breaches can result in significant threats to an individual’s financial or personal security, in addition to exposing private information, companies should make these security processes publicly available. Individuals can then make informed decisions and consider the potential risks before signing up for a service or giving a company their information.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li><li><p><strong>Data breach – </strong>A data breach occurs when an unauthorized party gains access to user information that a company collects, retains, or otherwise processes, and which compromises the integrity, security, or confidentiality of that information.</p><p></p></li></ul><p><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company terms of service or privacy policy</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Company security guide</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Data Breach Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P15_1_Data_breaches_Prepaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2892114,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P15.1 Data breaches - Postpaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P15_1_Data_breaches_Postpaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P15.1 Data breaches - Postpaid Mobile",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose to postpaid mobile users that it will notify the relevant authorities without undue delay when a data breach occurs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should publicly disclose information about its processes for responding to [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#databreach|<strong>data breaches</strong>]]. <br><br>When the security of users’ data has been compromised due to a data breach, companies should have clearly disclosed processes in place for addressing the security threat and for notifying affected users. Given that data breaches can result in significant threats to an individual’s financial or personal security, in addition to exposing private information, companies should make these security processes publicly available. Individuals can then make informed decisions and consider the potential risks before signing up for a service or giving a company their information.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li><li><p><strong>Data breach – </strong>A data breach occurs when an unauthorized party gains access to user information that a company collects, retains, or otherwise processes, and which compromises the integrity, security, or confidentiality of that information.</p><p></p></li></ul><p><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company terms of service or privacy policy</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Company security guide</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Data Breach Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P15_1_Data_breaches_Postpaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2892122,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P15.1 Data breaches - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P15_1_Data_breaches_Fixed_Line_Broadband.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P15.1 Data breaches - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose to fixed line broadband users that it will notify the relevant authorities without undue delay when a data breach occurs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should publicly disclose information about its processes for responding to [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#databreach|<strong>data breaches</strong>]]. <br><br>When the security of users’ data has been compromised due to a data breach, companies should have clearly disclosed processes in place for addressing the security threat and for notifying affected users. Given that data breaches can result in significant threats to an individual’s financial or personal security, in addition to exposing private information, companies should make these security processes publicly available. Individuals can then make informed decisions and consider the potential risks before signing up for a service or giving a company their information.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li><li><p><strong>Data breach – </strong>A data breach occurs when an unauthorized party gains access to user information that a company collects, retains, or otherwise processes, and which compromises the integrity, security, or confidentiality of that information.</p><p></p></li></ul><p><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company terms of service or privacy policy</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Company security guide</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Data Breach Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P15_1_Data_breaches_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2892136,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P15.2 Data breaches - Prepaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P15_2_Data_breaches_Prepaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P15.2 Data breaches - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose its process for notifying prepaid mobile data subjects who might be affected by a data breach?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should publicly disclose information about its processes for responding to [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#databreach|<strong>data breaches</strong>]]. <br><br>When the security of users’ data has been compromised due to a data breach, companies should have clearly disclosed processes in place for addressing the security threat and for notifying affected users. Given that data breaches can result in significant threats to an individual’s financial or personal security, in addition to exposing private information, companies should make these security processes publicly available. Individuals can then make informed decisions and consider the potential risks before signing up for a service or giving a company their information.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li><li><p><strong>Data breach – </strong>A data breach occurs when an unauthorized party gains access to user information that a company collects, retains, or otherwise processes, and which compromises the integrity, security, or confidentiality of that information.</p><p></p></li></ul><p><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company terms of service or privacy policy</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Company security guide</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Data Breach Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P15_2_Data_breaches_Prepaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2892143,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P15.2 Data breaches - Postpaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P15_2_Data_breaches_Postpaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P15.2 Data breaches - Postpaid Mobile",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose its process for notifying postpaid mobile data subjects who might be affected by a data breach?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should publicly disclose information about its processes for responding to [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#databreach|<strong>data breaches</strong>]]. <br><br>When the security of users’ data has been compromised due to a data breach, companies should have clearly disclosed processes in place for addressing the security threat and for notifying affected users. Given that data breaches can result in significant threats to an individual’s financial or personal security, in addition to exposing private information, companies should make these security processes publicly available. Individuals can then make informed decisions and consider the potential risks before signing up for a service or giving a company their information.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li><li><p><strong>Data breach – </strong>A data breach occurs when an unauthorized party gains access to user information that a company collects, retains, or otherwise processes, and which compromises the integrity, security, or confidentiality of that information.</p><p></p></li></ul><p><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company terms of service or privacy policy</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Company security guide</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Data Breach Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P15_2_Data_breaches_Postpaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2892150,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P15.2 Data breaches - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P15_2_Data_breaches_Fixed_Line_Broadband.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P15.2 Data breaches - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose its process for notifying fixed line broadband data subjects who might be affected by a data breach?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should publicly disclose information about its processes for responding to [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#databreach|<strong>data breaches</strong>]]. <br><br>When the security of users’ data has been compromised due to a data breach, companies should have clearly disclosed processes in place for addressing the security threat and for notifying affected users. Given that data breaches can result in significant threats to an individual’s financial or personal security, in addition to exposing private information, companies should make these security processes publicly available. Individuals can then make informed decisions and consider the potential risks before signing up for a service or giving a company their information.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li><li><p><strong>Data breach – </strong>A data breach occurs when an unauthorized party gains access to user information that a company collects, retains, or otherwise processes, and which compromises the integrity, security, or confidentiality of that information.</p><p></p></li></ul><p><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company terms of service or privacy policy</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Company security guide</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Data Breach Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P15_2_Data_breaches_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2892166,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P15.3 Data breaches - Prepaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P15_3_Data_breaches_Prepaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P15.3 Data breaches - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose what kinds of steps it will take to address the impact of a data breach on its prepaid mobile users?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should publicly disclose information about its processes for responding to [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#databreach|<strong>data breaches</strong>]]. <br><br>When the security of users’ data has been compromised due to a data breach, companies should have clearly disclosed processes in place for addressing the security threat and for notifying affected users. Given that data breaches can result in significant threats to an individual’s financial or personal security, in addition to exposing private information, companies should make these security processes publicly available. Individuals can then make informed decisions and consider the potential risks before signing up for a service or giving a company their information.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li><li><p><strong>Data breach – </strong>A data breach occurs when an unauthorized party gains access to user information that a company collects, retains, or otherwise processes, and which compromises the integrity, security, or confidentiality of that information.</p><p></p></li></ul><p><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company terms of service or privacy policy</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Company security guide</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Data Breach Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P15_3_Data_breaches_Prepaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2892173,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P15.3 Data breaches - Postpaid Mobile",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P15_3_Data_breaches_Postpaid_Mobile.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P15.3 Data breaches - Postpaid Mobile",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose what kinds of steps it will take to address the impact of a data breach on its postpaid mobile users?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should publicly disclose information about its processes for responding to [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#databreach|<strong>data breaches</strong>]]. <br><br>When the security of users’ data has been compromised due to a data breach, companies should have clearly disclosed processes in place for addressing the security threat and for notifying affected users. Given that data breaches can result in significant threats to an individual’s financial or personal security, in addition to exposing private information, companies should make these security processes publicly available. Individuals can then make informed decisions and consider the potential risks before signing up for a service or giving a company their information.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li><li><p><strong>Data breach – </strong>A data breach occurs when an unauthorized party gains access to user information that a company collects, retains, or otherwise processes, and which compromises the integrity, security, or confidentiality of that information.</p><p></p></li></ul><p><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company terms of service or privacy policy</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Company security guide</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Data Breach Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P15_3_Data_breaches_Postpaid_Mobile+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2892180,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+P15.3 Data breaches - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P15_3_Data_breaches_Fixed_Line_Broadband.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "P15.3 Data breaches - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose what kinds of steps it will take to address the impact of a data breach on its fixed line broadband users?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The company should publicly disclose information about its processes for responding to [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#databreach|<strong>data breaches</strong>]]. <br><br>When the security of users’ data has been compromised due to a data breach, companies should have clearly disclosed processes in place for addressing the security threat and for notifying affected users. Given that data breaches can result in significant threats to an individual’s financial or personal security, in addition to exposing private information, companies should make these security processes publicly available. Individuals can then make informed decisions and consider the potential risks before signing up for a service or giving a company their information.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Definition(s):</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Clearly disclose(s) </strong>– The company presents or explains its policies or practices in its public-facing materials in a way that is easy for users to find and understand.</p></li><li><p><strong>Data breach – </strong>A data breach occurs when an unauthorized party gains access to user information that a company collects, retains, or otherwise processes, and which compromises the integrity, security, or confidentiality of that information.</p><p></p></li></ul><p><strong>Potential sources:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Company terms of service or privacy policy</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Company security guide</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "N/A"
      ],
      "report_type": "Data Breach Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+P15_3_Data_breaches_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2896120,
      "name": "National Union of Students (United Kingdom)+Responsible Futures Accreditation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Union_of_Students_United_Kingdom+Responsible_Futures_Accreditation.json",
      "designer": "National Union of Students (United Kingdom)",
      "title": "Responsible Futures Accreditation",
      "question": "Does the university participate in NUS’ Responsible Futures programme?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Responsible Futures is a whole-institution approach to embedding social responsibility and sustainability across the formal and informal curriculum across both HE and FE. It is a supported change programme and accreditation mark that works to put sustainability at the heart of education.</strong></p><p>The Responsible Futures criteria were developed in collaboration with the 2014-15 pilot partnerships, representing FE and HE institutions and students’ unions across the UK as well as the advisory board comprised of various sector organisations including People and Planet, the Association of Colleges, EAUC, EAUC-Scotland, Learning for Sustainability Scotland, Society for the Environment, Higher Education Academy, Knowledge Transfer Network, a selection of academics, and the NUS Sustainability Direction and Oversight Board.</p><p>There are 45 criteria, of which 10 are mandatory, 32 are optional, and 3 are self-defined, giving the partnerships the opportunity to highlight and celebrate unique areas of their work. To achieve the accreditation mark, the Partnership must complete the mandatory criteria and meet or exceed the score threshold of 200 points, out of the maximum 300 points, not including the three self-defined criteria. The criteria cover 8 key themes:</p><ul><li><p>Baselines and benchmarks</p></li><li><p>Partnership and planning</p></li><li><p>Leadership and strategy</p></li><li><p>Policy and commitment</p></li><li><p>Interventions</p></li><li><p>Impacts and outcomes</p></li><li><p>Outreach</p></li><li><p>Self-defined criteria</p></li></ul><p>Further information available here: https://sustainability.nus.org.uk/responsible-futures</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>This metric is asking if the university participates in Responsible Futures.</strong></p><p>You can find the list of participating universities and student unions here: https://sustainability.nus.org.uk/responsible-futures/about/partnerships. Please select the category that accurately reflects the institution’s participation:</p><ul><li><p>Yes - Accredited</p></li><li><p>Yes - Working towards</p></li><li><p>Yes - Working through toolkit</p></li><li><p>Not Participating</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - Accredited",
        "Yes - Working towards",
        "Yes - Working through toolkit",
        "Not Participating"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Union_of_Students_United_Kingdom+Responsible_Futures_Accreditation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2896323,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Social screening of new suppliers, GRI 414-1 (G4-SO9-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Social_screening_of_new_suppliers_GRI_414_1_G4_SO9_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Social screening of new suppliers, GRI 414-1 (G4-SO9-a)",
      "question": "What percentage of new suppliers were screened using criteria for impacts on society?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines.</p>\r\n<p>An organization might be involved with impacts either through its own activities or as a result of its business relationships with other parties.</p>\r\n<p>Due diligence is expected of an organization in order to prevent and mitigate negative social impacts in the supply chain. These include impacts the organization either causes or contributes to, or that are directly linked to its activities, products, or services by its relationship with a supplier. </p>\r\n<p>Impacts may be prevented or mitigated at the stage of structuring contracts or other agreements, as well as via ongoing collaboration with suppliers.</p>\r\n<p><strong>This disclosure informs stakeholders about the percentage of suppliers selected or contracted subject to due diligence processes for social impacts.</strong></p>\r\n<div><hr>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">GRI 414 addresses the topic of supplier social assessment. The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric (G4-SO9) can be found <a href=\"/Societal%20Impacts%20screening%20of%20new%20suppliers%20(G4-SO9)%20Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;\">here</a>.</span></p>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify <strong>the percentage of new suppliers were screened using social criteria for a specific year. </strong></p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.</p>\r\n<p>Keywords and search terms for this metric:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>GRI</li>\r\n<li>414</li>\r\n<li>GRI Index</li>\r\n<li>Social Screeing</li>\r\n<li>New Suppliers</li>\r\n<li>Screening</li>\r\n<li>Impact</li>\r\n<li>Supply chain</li>\r\n<li>Suppliers</li>\r\n<li>SO9 (previously, companies reported this indicator with the code SO9)</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>To calculate the percentage of new suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Identify the total number of new suppliers that the organization considered selecting or contracting with.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Identify the total number of new suppliers that were screened using social criteria.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>Units </strong></p>\r\n<p>Companies may report this information in absolute numbers. Make sure you check the unit of measurement (%).</p>\r\n<p><strong>For Wikirate researchers:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Add [[Adding comments|comments]] documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex [[Conversions and Calculations|calculations or conversions]] made to determine the metric value.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Select the '<span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\">Unknown</span>' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p><br><br></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 414 - Supplier Social Assessment",
        "GRI Standards+414-1 New suppliers that were screened using social criteria",
        "GRI Standards+414-1-a Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using social criteria"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 206,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 9,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Social_screening_of_new_suppliers_GRI_414_1_G4_SO9_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2896334,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Suppliers assessed for social impact, GRI 414-2-a (formerly G4-SO10-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Suppliers_assessed_for_social_impact_GRI_414_2_a_formerly_G4_SO10_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Suppliers assessed for social impact, GRI 414-2-a (formerly G4-SO10-a)",
      "question": "What were the total number of the organizations suppliers subject to assessments for social impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. The GRI Standards are structured as a set of interrelated, modular standards. The full set can be downloaded at www.globalreporting.org/standards/. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">I<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">n the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 414 addresses the topic of supplier social assessment. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric (G4-SO9) can be found </span><a href=\"/Suppliers_with_potential_or_actual_negative_impacts_on_society_G4_SO10_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">An organization might be involved with impacts either through its own activities or as a result of its business relationships with other parties. Due diligence is expected of an organization in order to prevent and mitigate negative social impacts in the supply chain. These include impacts the organization either causes or contributes to, or that are directly linked to its activities, products, or services by its relationship with a supplier. These concepts are covered in key instruments of the United Nations.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s approach to preventing and mitigating negative social impacts in its supply chain. Suppliers can be assessed for a range of social criteria, including human rights (such as child labor and forced or compulsory labor); employment practices; health and safety practices; industrial relations; incidents (such as of abuse, coercion or harassment); wages and compensation; and working hours. Some of these criteria are covered in other GRI Standards in the 400 series (Social topics).</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Full disclosure guidance can be found here: <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1029/gri-414-supplier-social-assessment-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 414 Supplier Social Assessment</a>. </span>Additional disclosures that relate to this topic can also be found in: <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1015/gri-308-supplier-environmental-assessment-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 308: Supplier Environmental Assessment</a> If the reporting organization has identified both topics as material, it can combine its disclosures for GRI 308 and GRI 414. For example, if the organization uses the same approach for managing both topics, it can provide one combined explanation of its management approach.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this metric question you need to identify for a specific year, the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">number of suppliers that were assessed for social impacts</span>. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or not found in appropriate documents, select the 'Unknown' answer box.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> and search terms for this metric: Screening, Social, Impact, Supply chain, Suppliers, GRI, SO10, 414</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If any calculations are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 414 - Supplier Social Assessment",
        "GRI Standards+414-2 Negative social impacts in the supply chain and actions taken",
        "GRI Standards+414-2-a Number of suppliers assessed for social impacts"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 16,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Suppliers_assessed_for_social_impact_GRI_414_2_a_formerly_G4_SO10_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2896344,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Suppliers with actual negative social impacts, GRI 414-2-b1 (formerly G4-SO10-b1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Suppliers_with_actual_negative_social_impacts_GRI_414_2_b1_formerly_G4_SO10_b1.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Suppliers with actual negative social impacts, GRI 414-2-b1 (formerly G4-SO10-b1)",
      "question": "What were the total number of suppliers identified as having significant actual negative social impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. The GRI Standards are structured as a set of interrelated, modular standards. The full set can be downloaded at www.globalreporting.org/standards/. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">I<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">n the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 414 addresses the topic of supplier social assessment. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric (G4-SO9) can be found </span><a href=\"/Suppliers_with_potential_or_actual_negative_impacts_on_society_G4_SO10_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">An organization might be involved with impacts either through its own activities or as a result of its business relationships with other parties. Due diligence is expected of an organization in order to prevent and mitigate negative social impacts in the supply chain. These include impacts the organization either causes or contributes to, or that are directly linked to its activities, products, or services by its relationship with a supplier. These concepts are covered in key instruments of the United Nations.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s approach to preventing and mitigating negative social impacts in its supply chain. Suppliers can be assessed for a range of social criteria, including human rights (such as child labor and forced or compulsory labor); employment practices; health and safety practices; industrial relations; incidents (such as of abuse, coercion or harassment); wages and compensation; and working hours. Some of these criteria are covered in other GRI Standards in the 400 series (Social topics).</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Full disclosure guidance can be found here: <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1029/gri-414-supplier-social-assessment-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 414 Supplier Social Assessment</a>. </span>Additional disclosures that relate to this topic can also be found in: <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1015/gri-308-supplier-environmental-assessment-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 308: Supplier Environmental Assessment</a> If the reporting organization has identified both topics as material, it can combine its disclosures for GRI 308 and GRI 414. For example, if the organization uses the same approach for managing both topics, it can provide one combined explanation of its management approach.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this metric question you need to identify for a specific year, the <strong>number of suppliers identified as having significant <em>actual</em> negative social impacts</strong>. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or not found in appropriate documents, select the 'Unknown' answer box.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> and search terms for this metric: Screening, Negative, Social, Impact, Supply chain, Suppliers, GRI, SO10, 414</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If any calculations are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">See GRI 414-2-b2 to identify suppliers with <em>potential</em> negative social impacts.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 414 - Supplier Social Assessment",
        "GRI Standards+414-2 Negative social impacts in the supply chain and actions taken",
        "GRI Standards+414-2-b Number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 17,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 17,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Suppliers_with_actual_negative_social_impacts_GRI_414_2_b1_formerly_G4_SO10_b1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2896353,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Suppliers with potential negative social impacts, GRI 414-2-b2 (formerly G4-SO10-b2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Suppliers_with_potential_negative_social_impacts_GRI_414_2_b2_formerly_G4_SO10_b2.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Suppliers with potential negative social impacts, GRI 414-2-b2 (formerly G4-SO10-b2)",
      "question": "What were the total number of suppliers identified as having significant potential negative social impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards). These Standards are designed to be used by organizations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and society. The GRI Standards are structured as a set of interrelated, modular standards. The full set can be downloaded at www.globalreporting.org/standards/. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">I<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">n the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">GRI 414 addresses the topic of supplier social assessment. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The methodology for the former G4 standard for this metric (G4-SO9) can be found </span><a href=\"/Suppliers_with_potential_or_actual_negative_impacts_on_society_G4_SO10_Methodology\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">An organization might be involved with impacts either through its own activities or as a result of its business relationships with other parties. Due diligence is expected of an organization in order to prevent and mitigate negative social impacts in the supply chain. These include impacts the organization either causes or contributes to, or that are directly linked to its activities, products, or services by its relationship with a supplier. These concepts are covered in key instruments of the United Nations.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s approach to preventing and mitigating negative social impacts in its supply chain. Suppliers can be assessed for a range of social criteria, including human rights (such as child labor and forced or compulsory labor); employment practices; health and safety practices; industrial relations; incidents (such as of abuse, coercion or harassment); wages and compensation; and working hours. Some of these criteria are covered in other GRI Standards in the 400 series (Social topics).</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Full disclosure guidance can be found here: <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1029/gri-414-supplier-social-assessment-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 414 Supplier Social Assessment</a>. </span>Additional disclosures that relate to this topic can also be found in: <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1015/gri-308-supplier-environmental-assessment-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 308: Supplier Environmental Assessment</a> If the reporting organization has identified both topics as material, it can combine its disclosures for GRI 308 and GRI 414. For example, if the organization uses the same approach for managing both topics, it can provide one combined explanation of its management approach.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this metric question you need to identify for a specific year, the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">number of suppliers identified as having significant <em>potential</em> negative social impacts</span>. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or not found in appropriate documents, select the 'Unknown' answer box.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> and search terms for this metric: Screening, Negative, Social, Impact, Supply chain, Suppliers, GRI, SO10, 414</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If any calculations are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">See GRI 414-2-b1 to identify suppliers with <em>actual</em> negative social impacts</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 414 - Supplier Social Assessment",
        "GRI Standards+414-2 Negative social impacts in the supply chain and actions taken",
        "GRI Standards+414-2-b Number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Suppliers_with_potential_negative_social_impacts_GRI_414_2_b2_formerly_G4_SO10_b2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2896879,
      "name": "National Union of Students (United Kingdom)+Student Switch Off Campaign",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Union_of_Students_United_Kingdom+Student_Switch_Off_Campaign.json",
      "designer": "National Union of Students (United Kingdom)",
      "title": "Student Switch Off Campaign",
      "question": "Does the university participate in NUS’ Student Switch Off Campaign?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Student Switch Off is a not-for-profit international campaign encouraging student action on climate change</strong>. Delivered by the NUS, they run energy-saving and recycling competitions within halls of residence at Universities in the UK, Sweden, Cyprus, Greece, and Lithuania.</p><p>The Student Switch Off uses prize incentives such as Ben &amp; Jerry’s ice cream, tickets to Students’ Union nights out and communal parties and focuses on peer-to-peer communication and creating a sense of competition to provide incentives that go beyond just being more ‘environmentally friendly’. In 2015/16 the Student Switch Off campaign achieved a 6.6% reduction in electricity usage on average across all the participating halls of residence – keeping over 1,800 tonnes of CO2 out of the atmosphere.</p><p>Further information available here: http://studentswitchoff.org/about/</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>This metric is asking if the university participates in the Student Switch Off Campaign</strong>.</p><p>You can find the 2016/17 list of particpating universities here: http://studentswitchoff.org/unis/</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Union_of_Students_United_Kingdom+Student_Switch_Off_Campaign+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2896908,
      "name": "MANA-Vox+Alert Aggregate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/MANA_Vox+Alert_Aggregate.json",
      "designer": "MANA-Vox",
      "title": "Alert Aggregate",
      "question": "How many MANA alerts has the company been involved in?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>When gathering the environmental incident reports that corporations are involved in, MANA’s algorithm captures <em>each individual report</em> of an incident. As one incident may be reported on more than once, the number of incident report is not necessarily a good measure of how frequent companies are involved in such incidents. MANA therefore combines all reports of one incidents into one specific MANA alert.</p>\r\n<p>Assessing the total number of MANA alerts for a given company thus tells us how many environmental incidents the company has been involved in. The higher the number of incidents the more risk its operations pose for the environment and local communities surrounding their operations, which will likely pose a financial risk to the companies’ (potential) investors.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>MANA relies on its network of local and international organisations to report environmental incidents on the Internet and through online media channels like Twitter. Using their sophisticated algorithm, MANA extracts the following information from the identified sources:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Incident location;</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Company concerned;</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Source which made the incident known or identified it as accurate;</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Environmental categorization (forest, deforestation, water, pollution… etc.);</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Evidence (pictures, documents, testimonies of local communities …etc.);</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Response of the company involved in the incident; and</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Degree of public attention generated.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Lastly this data is then aggregated and organized in a suitable format for financiers to analyze it in their risk matrix.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "MANA Alerts",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/MANA_Vox+Alert_Aggregate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2896928,
      "name": "MANA-Vox+Incident Locations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/MANA_Vox+Incident_Locations.json",
      "designer": "MANA-Vox",
      "title": "Incident Locations",
      "question": "In which countries was the company involved in environmental incident reports?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><em>Explain why MANA tracks this data / why it is important to know this</em></p><p>When gathering the environmental incident reports that corporations are involved in, MANA’s algorithm captures lots of characteristics about these incidents, including their <strong>location</strong>. Looking at where these incidents take place helps us to understand if certain countries (or regions) are more likely to be the victims of malpractice and whether company’s have high risk countries where incidents are more frequent.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><em>Explain how MANA tracks this data (i.e. algorithm)</em></p><p>MANA relies on its network of local and international organisations to report environmental incidents on the Internet and through online media channels like Twitter. Using their sophisticated algorithm, MANA extracts the following information from the identified sources:</p><ul><li><p>Incident location;</p></li><li><p>Company concerned;</p></li><li><p>Source which made the incident known or identified it as accurate;</p></li><li><p>Environmental categorization (forest, deforestation, water, pollution… etc.);</p></li><li><p>Evidence (pictures, documents, testimonies of local communities …etc.);</p></li><li><p>Response of the company involved in the incident; and</p></li><li><p>Degree of public attention generated.</p></li></ul><p>Lastly this data is then aggregated and organized in a suitable format for financiers to analyze it in their risk matrix.</p><p><em><br>*** Explain where on the MANA platform the user can find the data and sources ***</em></p><p>To research … go to the [[http://www.mana-vox.org/|MANA website]] and …..</p><p><br>The following details about the incident locations should be provided in a comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>Specific region or city where the incident took place</p></li></ul><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/MANA_Vox+Incident_Locations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2899565,
      "name": "Sebastian Antequera+Long-term Contracts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sebastian_Antequera+Long_term_Contracts.json",
      "designer": "Sebastian Antequera",
      "title": "Long-term Contracts",
      "question": "What percentage of employees has a long-term contract?\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n-",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sebastian_Antequera+Long_term_Contracts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2899572,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.1 Access to terms of service - Fixed Line Broadband+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_1_Access_to_terms_of_service_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1.1 Access to terms of service - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "Are the company’s fixed link broadband terms of service easy to find?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\",\"NA\":\"\",\"N/A\":\"\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_Access_to_terms_of_service_score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_1_Access_to_terms_of_service_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2899578,
      "name": "Sebastian Antequera+female employee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sebastian_Antequera+female_employee.json",
      "designer": "Sebastian Antequera",
      "title": "female employee",
      "question": "how many females employees have the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sebastian_Antequera+female_employee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2899592,
      "name": "Sebastian Antequera+Suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sebastian_Antequera+Suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Sebastian Antequera",
      "title": "Suppliers",
      "question": "how many suppliers does the company have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sebastian_Antequera+Suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2899598,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.1 Access to terms of service - Postpaid  Mobile+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_1_Access_to_terms_of_service_Postpaid_Mobile+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1.1 Access to terms of service - Postpaid  Mobile",
      "question": "Are the company’s postpaid mobile terms of service easy to find?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\",\"N/A\":\"\",\"NA\":\"\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_Access_to_terms_of_service_score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_1_Access_to_terms_of_service_Postpaid_Mobile+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2899610,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.1 Access to terms of service - Prepaid Mobile+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_1_Access_to_terms_of_service_Prepaid_Mobile+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1.1 Access to terms of service - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "Are the company’s prepaid mobile terms of service easy to find?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\",\"NA\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_Access_to_terms_of_service_score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_1_Access_to_terms_of_service_Prepaid_Mobile+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2899623,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.2 Access to terms of service - Fixed Line Broadband+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_2_Access_to_terms_of_service_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1.2 Access to terms of service - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "Are the terms of service for the company’s fixed line broadband services available in the language(s) most commonly spoken by the company’s users?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_Access_to_terms_of_service_score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_2_Access_to_terms_of_service_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2899628,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.2 Access to terms of service - Postpaid Mobile+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_2_Access_to_terms_of_service_Postpaid_Mobile+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1.2 Access to terms of service - Postpaid Mobile",
      "question": "Are the terms of service for the company’s postpaid mobile services available in the language(s) most commonly spoken by the company’s users?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\",\"N/A\":\"\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_Access_to_terms_of_service_score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_2_Access_to_terms_of_service_Postpaid_Mobile+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2899633,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.2 Access to terms of service - Prepaid Mobile+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_2_Access_to_terms_of_service_Prepaid_Mobile+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1.2 Access to terms of service - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "Are the terms of service for the company’s prepaid mobile services available in the language(s) most commonly spoken by the company’s users?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_Access_to_terms_of_service_score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_2_Access_to_terms_of_service_Prepaid_Mobile+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2899640,
      "name": "Sebastian Antequera+study purposes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sebastian_Antequera+study_purposes.json",
      "designer": "Sebastian Antequera",
      "title": "study purposes",
      "question": "How much does the company invested on study purpose?\r\n\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sebastian_Antequera+study_purposes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2899663,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.3 Access to terms of service - Prepaid Mobile+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_3_Access_to_terms_of_service_Prepaid_Mobile+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1.3 Access to terms of service - Prepaid Mobile",
      "question": "Are the terms of service for prepaid mobile presented in an understandable manner?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_Access_to_terms_of_service_score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_3_Access_to_terms_of_service_Prepaid_Mobile+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2899668,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.3 Access to terms of service - Postpaid Mobile+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_3_Access_to_terms_of_service_Postpaid_Mobile+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1.3 Access to terms of service - Postpaid Mobile",
      "question": "Are the terms of service for postpaid mobile presented in an understandable manner?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_Access_to_terms_of_service_score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_3_Access_to_terms_of_service_Postpaid_Mobile+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2899673,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1.3 Access to terms of service - Fixed Line Broadband+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_3_Access_to_terms_of_service_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1.3 Access to terms of service - Fixed Line Broadband",
      "question": "Are the terms of service for fixed line broadband presented in an understandable manner?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_Access_to_terms_of_service_score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_3_Access_to_terms_of_service_Fixed_Line_Broadband+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2899686,
      "name": "Digital Rights Data Sprint+F1. Access to terms of service - score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_Access_to_terms_of_service_score.json",
      "designer": "Digital Rights Data Sprint",
      "title": "F1. Access to terms of service - score",
      "question": "How well did the company score for the accessibility of its terms of service?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>The company should offer [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#tos|<strong>terms of service</strong>]] that are [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytofind|<strong>easy to find</strong>]] and [[https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017-indicators/#easytounderstand|<strong>easy to understand</strong>]].<br><br>A company’s terms of service outline the relationship between the user and the company. The terms contain rules for what activities and content users are permitted to engage in and share on a company’s services, as such these terms directly impact if and how users can exercise their freedom of expression rights. Companies can also take action against users for violating the conditions described in the terms. Given this, we expect companies to ensure that users can easily locate these terms and understand what they mean.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~2899572",
          "weight": "11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2899598",
          "weight": "11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2899610",
          "weight": "11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2899623",
          "weight": "11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2899628",
          "weight": "11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2899633",
          "weight": "11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2899663",
          "weight": "11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2899668",
          "weight": "11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2899673",
          "weight": "11"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Digital_Rights_Data_Sprint+F1_Access_to_terms_of_service_score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2899692,
      "name": "Sebastian Antequera+Flexi-work",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sebastian_Antequera+Flexi_work.json",
      "designer": "Sebastian Antequera",
      "title": "Flexi-work",
      "question": "Does the company have flexi-work?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sebastian_Antequera+Flexi_work+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2899706,
      "name": "Sebastian Antequera+Grants provided",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sebastian_Antequera+Grants_provided.json",
      "designer": "Sebastian Antequera",
      "title": "Grants provided",
      "question": "how many grants did the company provided?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sebastian_Antequera+Grants_provided+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2899719,
      "name": "Sebastian Antequera+trained employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sebastian_Antequera+trained_employees.json",
      "designer": "Sebastian Antequera",
      "title": "trained employees",
      "question": "how many employees are trained",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sebastian_Antequera+trained_employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2899748,
      "name": "Sebastian Antequera+Accidents at work",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sebastian_Antequera+Accidents_at_work.json",
      "designer": "Sebastian Antequera",
      "title": "Accidents at work",
      "question": "how many accidents suffered the company?\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n-",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sebastian_Antequera+Accidents_at_work+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2900346,
      "name": "jaredczitron+Workplace Accidents",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/jaredczitron+Workplace_Accidents.json",
      "designer": "jaredczitron",
      "title": "Workplace Accidents",
      "question": "How many fatal Accidents occurred at the company facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Integrated Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/jaredczitron+Workplace_Accidents+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917011,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Non Discrimination and Equal Opportunity Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Non_Discrimination_and_Equal_Opportunity_Policy.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Non Discrimination and Equal Opportunity Policy",
      "question": "Which business operations are covered by the company's non-discrimination and equal opportunity policies?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>Affirmative action/reservation can be considered as mechanism but not mechanism in detail until there are details about how the mechanism functions</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Recruitment",
        "Career Advancement",
        "Diversity in Board",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "India Responsible Business Forum+Non Discrimination and Equal Opportunity Policy+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Non_Discrimination_and_Equal_Opportunity_Policy+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Non_Discrimination_and_Equal_Opportunity_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917021,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Minorities covered by Non Discrimination and Equal Opportunity Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Minorities_covered_by_Non_Discrimination_and_Equal_Opportunity_Policy.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Minorities covered by Non Discrimination and Equal Opportunity Policy",
      "question": "Which of the following minority groups are identified in and covered by the company's non-discrimination and equal opportunity policies?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Disadvantaged",
        "Women",
        "PWD",
        "Sexual Minorities",
        "SC",
        "ST",
        "Religion",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "India Responsible Business Forum+Minorities covered by Non Discrimination and Equal Opportunity Policy+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Minorities_covered_by_Non_Discrimination_and_Equal_Opportunity_Policy+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Minorities_covered_by_Non_Discrimination_and_Equal_Opportunity_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917037,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Non Discrimination and Equal Opportunity Policy+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Non_Discrimination_and_Equal_Opportunity_Policy+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Non Discrimination and Equal Opportunity Policy",
      "question": "Which business operations are covered by the company's non-discrimination and equal opportunity policies?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Recruitment\":\"3.33\",\"Career Advancement\":\"3.33\",\"Diversity in Board\":\"3.33\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Non_Discrimination_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Non_Discrimination_and_Equal_Opportunity_Policy+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917060,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Minorities covered by Non Discrimination and Equal Opportunity Policy+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Minorities_covered_by_Non_Discrimination_and_Equal_Opportunity_Policy+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Minorities covered by Non Discrimination and Equal Opportunity Policy",
      "question": "Which of the following minority groups are identified in and covered by the company's non-discrimination and equal opportunity policies?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Disadvantaged\":\"1.42\",\"Women\":\"1.42\",\"PWD\":\"1.42\",\"Sexual Minorities\":\"1.42\",\"SC\":\"1.42\",\"ST\":\"1.42\",\"Religion\":\"1.42\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Non_Discrimination_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Minorities_covered_by_Non_Discrimination_and_Equal_Opportunity_Policy+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917084,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Sexual Harassment Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Sexual_Harassment_Policy.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Sexual Harassment Policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on sexual harassment according to the law? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>(Highest band will be applicable only if all the below three components are mentioned) As per law this policy has been defined including the below three components: <br>- Defines sexual harrasment and elaborates procedures for filling complaints <br>- Clealry states composition of committee <br>- Mandates the display of details related to sexual harassment policy in the workspace</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "System",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "India Responsible Business Forum+Sexual Harassment Policy+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Sexual_Harassment_Policy+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Sexual_Harassment_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917106,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Sexual Harassment Policy+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Sexual_Harassment_Policy+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Sexual Harassment Policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on sexual harassment according to the law?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"5\",\"System\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Proactive_Retainment_Employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Sexual_Harassment_Policy+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917112,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Consultation Sexual Harassment Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Consultation_Sexual_Harassment_Policy.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Consultation Sexual Harassment Policy",
      "question": "Has the company consulted stakeholders for the formulation of their policy on sexual harassment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>These stakeholders included employees - permanent and contractual,  women</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "India Responsible Business Forum+Consultation Sexual Harassment Policy+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Consultation_Sexual_Harassment_Policy+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Consultation_Sexual_Harassment_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917121,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Consultation Sexual Harassment Policy+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Consultation_Sexual_Harassment_Policy+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Consultation Sexual Harassment Policy",
      "question": "Has the company consulted stakeholders for the formulation of their policy on sexual harassment?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Proactive_Retainment_Employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Consultation_Sexual_Harassment_Policy+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917135,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Sexual Harassment Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Sexual_Harassment_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Sexual Harassment Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company have a record of complaints received regarding sexual harassment and does it disclose this record?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Record",
        "Disclosure",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "India Responsible Business Forum+Sexual Harassment Disclosure+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Sexual_Harassment_Disclosure+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Sexual_Harassment_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917150,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Maternity Benefits",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Maternity_Benefits.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Maternity Benefits",
      "question": "Does the company policy acknowledge its effort towards creating enabling / facilitating an environment for women?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "India Responsible Business Forum+Maternity Benefits+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Maternity_Benefits+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Maternity_Benefits+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917158,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Maternity Benefits+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Maternity_Benefits+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Maternity Benefits",
      "question": "Does the company policy acknowledge its effort towards creating enabling / facilitating an environment for women?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Proactive_Retainment_Employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Maternity_Benefits+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917164,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Disabled Friendly Workplace",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Disabled_Friendly_Workplace.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Disabled Friendly Workplace",
      "question": "Does the company policy acknowledge its effort towards creating enabling / facilitating an environment for disabled?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "India Responsible Business Forum+Disabled Friendly Workplace+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Disabled_Friendly_Workplace+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Disabled_Friendly_Workplace+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917171,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Skill Development Opportunities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Skill_Development_Opportunities.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Skill Development Opportunities",
      "question": "Does the company policy acknowledge its role in skill enhancement in local area for better employability for:",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Women",
        "SC",
        "ST",
        "Youth",
        "PWD",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "India Responsible Business Forum+Skill Development Opportunities+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Skill_Development_Opportunities+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Skill_Development_Opportunities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917179,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Skill Development Opportunities+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Skill_Development_Opportunities+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Skill Development Opportunities",
      "question": "Does the company policy acknowledge its role in skill enhancement in local area for better employability for:",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Women\":\"3.33\",\"SC\":\"3.33\",\"ST\":\"0\",\"Youth\":\"0\",\"PWD\":\"3.33\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Proactive_Retainment_Employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Skill_Development_Opportunities+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917184,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Disabled Friendly Workplace+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Disabled_Friendly_Workplace+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Disabled Friendly Workplace",
      "question": "Does the company policy acknowledge its effort towards creating enabling / facilitating an environment for disabled?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Proactive_Retainment_Employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Disabled_Friendly_Workplace+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917190,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Proactive Retainment Employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Proactive_Retainment_Employees.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Proactive Retainment Employees",
      "question": "How well are the company’s strategies directed at achieving non-discriminatory environment?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~2917106",
          "weight": "12.5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2917121",
          "weight": "12.5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2917158",
          "weight": "12.5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2917184",
          "weight": "12.5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2917179",
          "weight": "37.5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2933770",
          "weight": "12.5"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Non_Discrimination_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Proactive_Retainment_Employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917321,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Women Representation in Board of Directors",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Women_Representation_in_Board_of_Directors.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Women Representation in Board of Directors",
      "question": "Does the company disclose if women are present in the Board of Directors?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Disclosure",
        "Representation",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "India Responsible Business Forum+Women Representation in Board of Directors+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Women_Representation_in_Board_of_Directors+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Women_Representation_in_Board_of_Directors+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917329,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Women Representation in Board of Directors+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Women_Representation_in_Board_of_Directors+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Women Representation in Board of Directors",
      "question": "Does the company disclose if women are present in the Board of Directors?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Disclosure\":\"10\",\"Representation\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Staff_Diversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Women_Representation_in_Board_of_Directors+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917335,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+PWD Representation in Board of Directors",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+PWD_Representation_in_Board_of_Directors.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "PWD Representation in Board of Directors",
      "question": "Does the company disclose if PWD or SC or ST are present in the Board of Directors?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Disclosure",
        "Representation",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "India Responsible Business Forum+PWD Representation in Board of Directors+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+PWD_Representation_in_Board_of_Directors+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+PWD_Representation_in_Board_of_Directors+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917344,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+PWD Representation in Board of Directors+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+PWD_Representation_in_Board_of_Directors+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "PWD Representation in Board of Directors",
      "question": "Does the company disclose if PWD or SC or ST are present in the Board of Directors?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Disclosure\":\"10\",\"Representation\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Staff_Diversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+PWD_Representation_in_Board_of_Directors+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917350,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Women Representation in Workforce",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Women_Representation_in_Workforce.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Women Representation in Workforce",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the number of permanent women employees in the total workforce?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Disclosure",
        "Representation",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "India Responsible Business Forum+Women Representation in Workforce+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Women_Representation_in_Workforce+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Women_Representation_in_Workforce+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917358,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+PWD Representation in Workforce",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+PWD_Representation_in_Workforce.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "PWD Representation in Workforce",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the number of permanent employees with disabilities in the total workforce?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Disclosure",
        "Representation",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "India Responsible Business Forum+PWD Representation in Workforce+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+PWD_Representation_in_Workforce+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+PWD_Representation_in_Workforce+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917366,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+SC Representation in Workforce",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+SC_Representation_in_Workforce.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "SC Representation in Workforce",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the number of permanent SC employees in the total workforce?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Disclosure",
        "Representation",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "India Responsible Business Forum+SC Representation in Workforce+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+SC_Representation_in_Workforce+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+SC_Representation_in_Workforce+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917374,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+ST Representation in Workforce",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+ST_Representation_in_Workforce.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "ST Representation in Workforce",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the number of permanent ST employees in the total workforce?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Disclosure",
        "Representation",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "India Responsible Business Forum+ST Representation in Workforce+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+ST_Representation_in_Workforce+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+ST_Representation_in_Workforce+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917385,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Women Representation in Workforce+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Women_Representation_in_Workforce+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Women Representation in Workforce",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the number of permanent women employees in the total workforce?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Disclosure\":\"10\",\"Representation\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Staff_Diversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Women_Representation_in_Workforce+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917390,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+PWD Representation in Workforce+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+PWD_Representation_in_Workforce+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "PWD Representation in Workforce",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the number of permanent employees with disabilities in the total workforce?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Disclosure\":\"10\",\"Representation\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Staff_Diversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+PWD_Representation_in_Workforce+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917395,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+SC Representation in Workforce+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+SC_Representation_in_Workforce+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "SC Representation in Workforce",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the number of permanent SC employees in the total workforce?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Disclosure\":\"10\",\"Representation\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Staff_Diversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+SC_Representation_in_Workforce+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917400,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+ST Representation in Workforce+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+ST_Representation_in_Workforce+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "ST Representation in Workforce",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the number of permanent ST employees in the total workforce?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Disclosure\":\"10\",\"Representation\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Staff_Diversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+ST_Representation_in_Workforce+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917406,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Staff Diversity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Staff_Diversity.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Staff Diversity",
      "question": "How well does the company disclose on it’s diversity within the Board Of Directors and among employees?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "0-10",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~2917329",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2917344",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2917385",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2917390",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2917395",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2917400",
          "weight": "16.67"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Non_Discrimination_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Staff_Diversity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917412,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Non Discrimination Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Non_Discrimination_Score.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Non Discrimination Score",
      "question": "How well does the company disclose about it’s non discrimination policies?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  (m1 + m2 + m3 + 4) / 4;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~2917190"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~2917406"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~2917037"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~2917060"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Non_Discrimination_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917735,
      "name": "Supplier Transparency Research Group+Company Website",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Supplier_Transparency_Research_Group+Company_Website.json",
      "designer": "Supplier Transparency Research Group",
      "title": "Company Website",
      "question": "Does the company (supplier) have a website?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>A company website is generally the first port of call for a company’s public communications. When looking for their performance data it is therefore the starting point.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is looking for the company’s website. Go to your favorite search engine and use the company name to find out if they have a website.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Supplier_Transparency_Research_Group+Company_Website+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917742,
      "name": "Supplier Transparency Research Group+Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Supplier_Transparency_Research_Group+Policy.json",
      "designer": "Supplier Transparency Research Group",
      "title": "Policy",
      "question": "Does the company disclose any policies?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Supply chain policies that have been instated by consumer goods companies, often are intended to cascade down the supply chain. It is therefore interesting to track which policies suppliers have in place and whether these are the same policies as their buying companies articulate.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Once on the company website, use Control+F to find out if the company discloses the <strong>policies</strong> it upholds. Search words that can be helpful include:</p><ul><li><p>policy</p></li><li><p>policies</p></li><li><p>guidelines</p></li></ul><p></p><p>Please add any relevant contextual information - like where on their website you found the information - to the comment of the metric answer.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Supplier_Transparency_Research_Group+Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917748,
      "name": "Supplier Transparency Research Group+Number of employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Supplier_Transparency_Research_Group+Number_of_employees.json",
      "designer": "Supplier Transparency Research Group",
      "title": "Number of employees",
      "question": "Does the company disclose their number of employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The size of a workforce provides insight into the scale of impacts created by labor issues. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Once on the company website, use Control+F to find out if the company discloses their <strong>number of employees</strong>. Search words that can be helpful include:</p><ul><li><p>employee</p></li><li><p>worker</p></li><li><p>contractor</p></li></ul><p></p><p>Please add any relevant contextual information - like where on their website you found the information - to the comment of the metric answer.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Employee.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Supplier_Transparency_Research_Group+Number_of_employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2917761,
      "name": "Supplier Transparency Research Group+Certifications",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Supplier_Transparency_Research_Group+Certifications.json",
      "designer": "Supplier Transparency Research Group",
      "title": "Certifications",
      "question": "Does the company disclose which certifications it has?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>For companies that supply products, certifications are helpful quality standard references. It can be insightful indications of the companies strong suits.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Once on the company website, use Control+F to find out if the company discloses the <strong>certifications</strong> it has. Search words that can be helpful include:</p><ul><li><p>certification</p></li><li><p>audit</p></li></ul><p></p><p>Please add any relevant contextual information - like where on their website you found the information - to the comment of the metric answer.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Supplier_Transparency_Research_Group+Certifications+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2929009,
      "name": "Commons+Supplied By",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Supplied_By.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Supplied By",
      "question": "What companies supply this company?",
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": "<p>When global supply chains are opaque, consumers lack meaningful information about where their products were made and under what conditions. Do they enable socially or environmentally irresponsible practices? Without supply chain transparency, there is just no way of knowing.</p>\r\n<p>The first step in making supply chains more transparent is mapping the supplier relationships between companies. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This data has been collected through semi-automated techniques. Where possible it has been scraped from supplier lists that were published by the companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Tier 0 Supplier",
        "Tier 1 Supplier",
        "Tier 2 Supplier",
        "Tier 3 Supplier",
        "Tier 4 Supplier",
        "Beyond Tier 1"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+G1 - Business Conduct",
        "ESRS Standards+General Disclosures",
        "ESRS Standards+SBM.1 - Strategy, business model and value chain"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 778,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 13,
      "companies": 350,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Supplier_List_all.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_suppliers_with_proportion_of_migrant_workers_disclosed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_supplier_with_number_of_workers_disclosed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_suppliers_with_proportion_of_female_workers_disclosed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_suppliers_with_proportion_of_male_workers_disclosed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_suppliers_with_disclosed_address.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Supplied_By+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2929015,
      "name": "Commons+Supplier of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Supplier_of.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Supplier of",
      "question": "Which companies does this supplier supply to?",
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">When global supply chains are opaque, consumers lack meaningful information about where their products were made and under what conditions. Do they enable socially or environmentally irresponsible practices? Without supply chain transparency, there is just no way of knowing.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The first step in making supply chains more transparent is mapping the supplier relationships between companies. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This data has been collected through semi-automated techniques. Where possible it has been scraped from supplier lists that were published by the companies.</span></p>",
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 143832,
      "bookmarkers": 6,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 64470,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Industry.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Supplier_of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2932935,
      "name": "OpenCorporates+Controls",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+Controls.json",
      "designer": "OpenCorporates",
      "title": "Controls",
      "question": "Which companies are controlled (partially or wholly) by the referred company?",
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 390,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 232,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+Controls+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2932941,
      "name": "OpenCorporates+is Controlled by",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+is_Controlled_by.json",
      "designer": "OpenCorporates",
      "title": "is Controlled by",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 577,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 532,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+is_Controlled_by+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2932948,
      "name": "OpenCorporates+Subsidiary Of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+Subsidiary_Of.json",
      "designer": "OpenCorporates",
      "title": "Subsidiary Of",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+Subsidiary_Of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2932954,
      "name": "OpenCorporates+has Subsidiary",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+has_Subsidiary.json",
      "designer": "OpenCorporates",
      "title": "has Subsidiary",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+has_Subsidiary+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2932961,
      "name": "OpenCorporates+has Branch",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+has_Branch.json",
      "designer": "OpenCorporates",
      "title": "has Branch",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+has_Branch+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2932967,
      "name": "OpenCorporates+has Parent Company",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+has_Parent_Company.json",
      "designer": "OpenCorporates",
      "title": "has Parent Company",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+has_Parent_Company+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2932975,
      "name": "Proxy Voting Research Group+has Voting Authority over",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Proxy_Voting_Research_Group+has_Voting_Authority_over.json",
      "designer": "Proxy Voting Research Group",
      "title": "has Voting Authority over",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Majority rule vote",
        "Advisory vote",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 13,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 7,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Proxy_Voting_Research_Group+has_Voting_Authority_over+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2932981,
      "name": "Proxy Voting Research Group+receives shareholder votes from",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Proxy_Voting_Research_Group+receives_shareholder_votes_from.json",
      "designer": "Proxy Voting Research Group",
      "title": "receives shareholder votes from",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Proxy_Voting_Research_Group+receives_shareholder_votes_from+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2932988,
      "name": "Proxy Voting Research Group+has Voting Authority over (weighted)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Proxy_Voting_Research_Group+has_Voting_Authority_over_weighted.json",
      "designer": "Proxy Voting Research Group",
      "title": "has Voting Authority over (weighted)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 13,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 7,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Proxy_Voting_Research_Group+has_Voting_Authority_over_weighted+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2932994,
      "name": "Proxy Voting Research Group+receives shareholder votes from (weighted)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Proxy_Voting_Research_Group+receives_shareholder_votes_from_weighted.json",
      "designer": "Proxy Voting Research Group",
      "title": "receives shareholder votes from (weighted)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Proxy_Voting_Research_Group+receives_shareholder_votes_from_weighted+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2933001,
      "name": "Proxy Voting Research Group+voted with management of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Proxy_Voting_Research_Group+voted_with_management_of.json",
      "designer": "Proxy Voting Research Group",
      "title": "voted with management of",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Proxy_Voting_Research_Group+voted_with_management_of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2933007,
      "name": "Proxy Voting Research Group+management supported by votes of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Proxy_Voting_Research_Group+management_supported_by_votes_of.json",
      "designer": "Proxy Voting Research Group",
      "title": "management supported by votes of",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Proxy_Voting_Research_Group+management_supported_by_votes_of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2933014,
      "name": "OpenCorporates+Shareholder Of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+Shareholder_Of.json",
      "designer": "OpenCorporates",
      "title": "Shareholder Of",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+Shareholder_Of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2933020,
      "name": "OpenCorporates+has Shareholder",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+has_Shareholder.json",
      "designer": "OpenCorporates",
      "title": "has Shareholder",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+has_Shareholder+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2933755,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+Female Workers %",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Female_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "Female Workers %",
      "question": "What percentage of the company’s workers are female?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric calculates the percentage of a company's employees that are female.</p>",
      "methodology": "",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  Females / Employees * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~837241",
          "name": "Females"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~836097",
          "name": "Employees"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3566,
      "bookmarkers": 6,
      "datasets": 10,
      "companies": 1752,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Female_workers_managers_differential.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Percentage_of_Female_Employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Female_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2933763,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+Female workers managers differential",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Female_workers_managers_differential.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "Female workers managers differential",
      "question": "Are women over or under-represented in management positions?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Positive values mean that there are a greater proportion of female managers than female workers, negative values mean that women are under-represented in management relative to their representation in the workforce.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 - m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~1830298"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~2933755"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2085,
      "bookmarkers": 8,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 823,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Yearly_change_in_female_workers_managers_differential.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Female_workers_managers_differential+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2933770,
      "name": "India Responsible Business Forum+Sexual Harassment Disclosure+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Sexual_Harassment_Disclosure+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "India Responsible Business Forum",
      "title": "Sexual Harassment Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company have a record of complaints received regarding sexual harassment and does it disclose this record?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Record\":\"5\",\"Disclosure\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Proactive_Retainment_Employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/India_Responsible_Business_Forum+Sexual_Harassment_Disclosure+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2933781,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+Common Environmental Metrics Reported",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Environmental_Metrics_Reported.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "Common Environmental Metrics Reported",
      "question": "Of a set of 10 commonly reported metrics from the GRI standard, for how many did this company disclose the answers?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reputational Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, m8, m9, m10]);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~826615",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~826629",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~849642",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~848767",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~836262",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~836246",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~885125",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m8",
          "metric": "~801383",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m9",
          "metric": "~846580",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m10",
          "metric": "~801164",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 6594,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 1761,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Environmental_Metrics_Reported+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2934515,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+Common Social Metrics Reported",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Social_Metrics_Reported.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "Common Social Metrics Reported",
      "question": "Of a set of 15 commonly reported Social/Labour metrics from the GRI standard, for how many did this company disclose the answers?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric counts “Unknown” values for a range of social/labour metrics (see formula above) and subtracts these from 15 (the total number of metrics considered) to give a count of the number of reported answers.</p><p>This metric will only be calculated for companies that have some form of answer for all 15 metrics (i.e. an answer or Unknown) - if even one of the metrics has not been assessed for the company it will be excluded from this analysis.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Temporary Work",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, m8, m9, m10, m11, m12, m13, m14, m15]);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~836097",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~837241",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~837254",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~837454",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~837487",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~836128",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~836163",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m8",
          "metric": "~813500",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m9",
          "metric": "~836314",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m10",
          "metric": "~815203",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m11",
          "metric": "~837526",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m12",
          "metric": "~837515",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m13",
          "metric": "~836080",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m14",
          "metric": "~837320",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m15",
          "metric": "~1830298",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 6822,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 2326,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Common_Social_Metrics_Reported+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2939479,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+Percentage of waste recycled",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Percentage_of_waste_recycled.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "Percentage of waste recycled",
      "question": "What percentage of the company’s waste was recycled?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~885125"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~848767"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2989,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 1118,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Percentage_of_waste_recycled+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 2940451,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+Percentage renewable fuel used",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Percentage_renewable_fuel_used.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "Percentage renewable fuel used",
      "question": "What percentage of the organization's energy use came from renewable sources?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / (m1 + m2) * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~836964"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~836952"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3521,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 1286,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Percentage_renewable_fuel_used+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3080893,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Supply Chain Transparency Pledge Alignment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Transparency_Pledge_Alignment.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Supply Chain Transparency Pledge Alignment",
      "question": "Did the company align with the Apparel and Footwear Supply Chain Transparency Pledge?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Supply chain transparency - starting with publishing names, addresses, and other important information about factories producing for global apparel companies - is a powerful tool to assert workers’ human rights, advance ethical business practices, and build stakeholder trust. <br><br>Companies have a responsibility to take steps to prevent human rights risks throughout their supply chains, and to identify and address any abuses that arise despite those preventative efforts. In order to live up to that responsibility, they should adopt industry good practices.<br><br>By publishing factory names, street addresses, and other important information, global apparel companies allow workers and labor and human rights advocates to alert apparel companies to labor rights or other abuses in their supplier factories.<br><br>An apparel company that does not publish its supplier factory information contributes to possible delays in workers or other stakeholders being able to access the company’s complaint mechanisms or other remedies. Workers and labor rights advocates often expend sub- stantial time and effort trying to collect brand labels or using other methods to determine which companies are sourcing from factories where human rights abuses are occurring. Meanwhile, they lose valuable time and put workers at risk of retaliation and continued exposure to dangerous or abusive working conditions. Such delays re- duce the overall effectiveness of grievance redress mech- anisms that apparel companies and other parties put in place.<br><br>Disclosing names, addresses, and other relevant information about supplier factories helps make it possible to determine whether a brand has sufficient leverage or influence in a particular factory or country to achieve re- mediation of worker rights abuses.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Transpency page of the Clean Clothes Campaign website: https://cleanclothes.org/transparency<br>Using the dynamic list of 'Current/Anticipated Disclosure by December 31, 2017 vs. Pledge Standards' you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge.<br><br>Review the list to determine if and to what extend the company has aligned with the Apparel and Footwear Supply Chain Transparency Pledge.<br><br>Provide any specifics about the alignment in the comment to the metric value.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Full alignment",
        "Partial alignment",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 72,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 72,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Transparency_Pledge_Alignment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3080903,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Factory Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Factory_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Factory Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose all authorized production units and processing facilities part of its supply chain, and if so, which information about these facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Supply chain transparency - starting with publishing names, addresses, and other important information about factories producing for global apparel companies - is a powerful tool to assert workers’ human rights, advance ethical business practices, and build stakeholder trust. <br><br>Companies have a responsibility to take steps to prevent human rights risks throughout their supply chains, and to identify and address any abuses that arise despite those preventative efforts. In order to live up to that responsibility, they should adopt industry good practices.<br><br>By publishing factory names, street addresses, and other important information, global apparel companies allow workers and labor and human rights advocates to alert apparel companies to labor rights or other abuses in their supplier factories.<br><br>An apparel company that does not publish its supplier factory information contributes to possible delays in workers or other stakeholders being able to access the company’s complaint mechanisms or other remedies. Workers and labor rights advocates often expend sub- stantial time and effort trying to collect brand labels or using other methods to determine which companies are sourcing from factories where human rights abuses are occurring. Meanwhile, they lose valuable time and put workers at risk of retaliation and continued exposure to dangerous or abusive working conditions. Such delays re- duce the overall effectiveness of grievance redress mech- anisms that apparel companies and other parties put in place.<br><br>Disclosing names, addresses, and other relevant information about supplier factories helps make it possible to determine whether a brand has sufficient leverage or influence in a particular factory or country to achieve re- mediation of worker rights abuses.<br></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Transparency page of the Clean Clothes Campaign website: https://cleanclothes.org/transparency<br>Using the dynamic list of 'Current/Anticipated Disclosure by December 31, 2017 vs. Pledge Standards' you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge.<br><br>Review the list to determine if the company has aligned with the Apparel and Footwear Supply Chain Transparency Pledge.<br><br>If so, review the data sheet to determine which of the following kinds of information it will disclose about all authorized production units and processing facilities part of its supply chain:<br><br>- Name, <br>- Country, <br>- Address, <br>- Ownership, <br>- Product Type, <br>- Number of Workers<br><br>Provide any relevant contextual information in the comment to the metric value.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Name",
        "Country",
        "Address",
        "Ownership",
        "Factory Type",
        "Factory Number",
        "Product Type",
        "Number of Workers",
        "Parent Company",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 329,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 171,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Factory_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3080913,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Frequency of Supply Chain Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Frequency_of_Supply_Chain_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Frequency of Supply Chain Disclosure",
      "question": "How often within a year does/will the company disclose the information it promises to publish about its supply chain in the CCC Transparency Pledge?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Supply chain transparency - starting with publishing names, addresses, and other important information about factories producing for global apparel companies - is a powerful tool to assert workers’ human rights, advance ethical business practices, and build stakeholder trust. <br><br>Companies have a responsibility to take steps to prevent human rights risks throughout their supply chains, and to identify and address any abuses that arise despite those preventative efforts. In order to live up to that responsibility, they should adopt industry good practices.<br><br>By publishing factory names, street addresses, and other important information, global apparel companies allow workers and labor and human rights advocates to alert apparel companies to labor rights or other abuses in their supplier factories.<br><br>An apparel company that does not publish its supplier factory information contributes to possible delays in workers or other stakeholders being able to access the company’s complaint mechanisms or other remedies. Workers and labor rights advocates often expend sub- stantial time and effort trying to collect brand labels or using other methods to determine which companies are sourcing from factories where human rights abuses are occurring. Meanwhile, they lose valuable time and put workers at risk of retaliation and continued exposure to dangerous or abusive working conditions. Such delays re- duce the overall effectiveness of grievance redress mech- anisms that apparel companies and other parties put in place.<br><br>Disclosing names, addresses, and other relevant information about supplier factories helps make it possible to determine whether a brand has sufficient leverage or influence in a particular factory or country to achieve re- mediation of worker rights abuses.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Transpency page of the Clean Clothes Campaign website: https://cleanclothes.org/transparency<br>Using the dynamic list of 'Current/Anticipated Disclosure by December 31, 2017 vs. Pledge Standards' you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge.<br><br>Review the list to determine if the company has aligned with the Apparel and Footwear Supply Chain Transparency Pledge.<br><br>If so, review the data sheet to determine how often within the timespan of a year the company will be disclosing it supply chain information. Usually it ranges between 1 and 6 times a year.<br><br>Provide any relevant contextual information in the comment to the metric value.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "per year",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 44,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 44,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Frequency_of_Supply_Chain_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3080922,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Timeframe Pledge Realization",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Timeframe_Pledge_Realization.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Timeframe Pledge Realization",
      "question": "What is the indicated timeframe in which the company will complete its alignment with the Apparel and Footwear Supply Chain Transparency Pledge?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Supply chain transparency - starting with publishing names, addresses, and other important information about factories producing for global apparel companies - is a powerful tool to assert workers’ human rights, advance ethical business practices, and build stakeholder trust. <br><br>Companies have a responsibility to take steps to prevent human rights risks throughout their supply chains, and to identify and address any abuses that arise despite those preventative efforts. In order to live up to that responsibility, they should adopt industry good practices.<br><br>By publishing factory names, street addresses, and other important information, global apparel companies allow workers and labor and human rights advocates to alert apparel companies to labor rights or other abuses in their supplier factories.<br><br>An apparel company that does not publish its supplier factory information contributes to possible delays in workers or other stakeholders being able to access the company’s complaint mechanisms or other remedies. Workers and labor rights advocates often expend sub- stantial time and effort trying to collect brand labels or using other methods to determine which companies are sourcing from factories where human rights abuses are occurring. Meanwhile, they lose valuable time and put workers at risk of retaliation and continued exposure to dangerous or abusive working conditions. Such delays re- duce the overall effectiveness of grievance redress mech- anisms that apparel companies and other parties put in place.<br><br>Disclosing names, addresses, and other relevant information about supplier factories helps make it possible to determine whether a brand has sufficient leverage or influence in a particular factory or country to achieve re- mediation of worker rights abuses.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Transpency page of the Clean Clothes Campaign website: https://cleanclothes.org/transparency<br>Using the dynamic list of 'Current/Anticipated Disclosure by December 31, 2017 vs. Pledge Standards' you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge.<br><br>Review the list to determine if the company has aligned with the Apparel and Footwear Supply Chain Transparency Pledge.<br><br>If so, review the data sheet to determine by when the company has pledged to disclose its supply chain information.<br><br>Provide any relevant contextual information in the comment to the metric value.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Year",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 44,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 44,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Timeframe_Pledge_Realization+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3080932,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Compensation Tazreen Fire Victims",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Compensation_Tazreen_Fire_Victims.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Compensation Tazreen Fire Victims",
      "question": "Did the company provide compensation for the Tazreen Fire victims?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Tazreen Fashions factory fire</strong></p><p>On 24 November 2012 a fire broke out in the Tazreen Fashions garment factory in Bangladesh. Exits to the outside were locked, which left workers trapped inside the building. The only way out was through windows on the upper floors, while the lower windows were barred. Over a hundred workers were injured by jumping from the windows of the third and fourth floors, sustaining serious back and head injuries which have left many of them in constant pain. For the last three years the families of those killed and injured have been fighting for compensation for the loss of their loved ones or loss of their own ability to earn an income.</p><p></p><p><strong>Tazreen Claims Administration Trust</strong></p><p>An agreement to make payments specifically to cover loss of income and medical treatment was signed by IndustriALL Global Union, the Clean Clothes Campaign, C&amp;A and the C&amp;A Foundation just prior to the second anniversary of the fire in 2014. This agreement led to the creation of the <strong><a href=\"http://www.tazreenclaimstrust.org/\">Tazreen Claims Administration Trust</a></strong> in September 2015 which oversees the claims process, cooperates with organizations representing the families and collects funding to make the payments. <br></p><p>The Trust raised money to cover the payments primarily through contributions from brands and retailers whose products were produced at the Tazreen factory. C&amp;A, Li &amp; Fung (which sourced on behalf of Sean Jean), BRAC USA (on behalf of Walmart), Spanish department store El Corte Ingles and German brand KiK have paid into the fund. Other brands that sourced from Tazreen fashions have thus far failed to take responsibility towards the survivors and the families of the killed workers. <br></p><p>In <strong><a href=\"https://cleanclothes.org/news/2016/07/08/payment-on-claims-from-survivors-and-families-affected-by-tazreen-factory-fire-completed\" title=\"\"\"\">June 2016</a></strong>, the Claims Administration Trust completed its work of providing loss of income payments to all injured workers and to the dependents of those who were killed. This meant an important recognition of the rights of the survivors and families affected by the Tazreen fire, after being overshadowed by the scale of the Rana Plaza disaster. The Tazreen claims process also establishes further both the possibility and the necessity of ensuring that victims of any future disasters are provided with loss of income payments and support in line with international norms and standards.</p><p></p><p>Source: [[https://cleanclothes.org/safety/tazreen|Clean Clothes Campaign]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Tazreen Claims Administration Trust website:</p><p>http://tazreenclaimstrust.org/donors/</p><p></p><p>Review the list to determine if the company has made a contribution to the Tazreen compensation fund.</p><p></p><p>Please provide the following contextual information in the comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p>whether or not it is publicly disclosed how much the company has donated</p></li><li><p>if disclosed, how much was donated</p></li><li><p>using [[https://cleanclothes.org/safety/tazreen|the list of companies in the second paragraph]] find out whether the company’s supply chain included Tazreen Fashions or whether it made a donation voluntarily regardless of their involvement</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "No evidence found of involvement"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 59,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 59,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Compensation_Tazreen_Fire_Victims+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3080940,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Compensation Rana Plaza Victims",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Compensation_Rana_Plaza_Victims.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Compensation Rana Plaza Victims",
      "question": "Did the company provide compensation for the Rana Plaza victims?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The collapse of the Rana Plaza factory building in Bangladesh is the worst ever industrial incident to hit the garment industry. On 24 April 2013, the Rana Plaza building came crashing down, killing 1,134 people and leaving thousands more injured. People all across the world looked on in shock and horror as media reports poured in revealing the true extent of the&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"http://www.worldpressphoto.org/awards/2014/spot-news/taslima-akhter?gallery=1125526\">human toll</a></strong>. There were harrowing stories of survival, of people who had no choice but to amputate their own limbs in order to be freed from the rubble and survive.</p><p>The collapse of Rana Plaza brought worldwide attention to deathtrap workplaces within the garment industry. The public interest and media attention has resulted in more political pressure than ever before to effect change and has led to significant ground-breaking approaches to prevention and remedy, with the establishment of the binding Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh and the Rana Plaza Arrangement involving all major stakeholders, meant to compensate the survivors and the families of the killed workers.</p><p><strong>The Rana Plaza Arrangement</strong></p><p>It is true that no amount can make up for the loss of a loved one or the resulting physical and emotional scars inflicted on those who survived such a tragedy. But what is also true is that the survivors and victims’ families should be compensated for the financial and medical losses they sustained as a direct result of the disaster. After the disaster the Rana Plaza Arrangement was set up, which included a trust fund collecting contributions primarily from the 29 global brands that had recent or current orders with at least one of the five garment factories in the Rana Plaza building. Only after more than two years after the disaster and some vigourous campaigning could the last reluctant brands, such as Benetton, be convinced to pay an approriate amount into the fund and was the target of $30 million compensation reached.</p><p>Read more here:&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https://cleanclothes.org/news/2015/06/08/we-won-rana-plaza-workers-get-full-compensation\" title=\"\"\"\">We won</a></strong>: the announcement of full compensation for the families affected by the Rana Plaza disaster. Three years on we released an&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https://cleanclothes.org/resources/publications/rana-plaza-three-years-on-compensation-justice-and-workers-safety-full-report\" title=\"\"\"\">update</a></strong>&nbsp;on where we stand now.<br></p><p>Despite the long campaign&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https://cleanclothes.org/safety/ranaplaza/who-needs-to-pay-up\" title=\"\"\"\">not all brands</a></strong>&nbsp;that were associated with production in one of the Rana Plaza factories paid up.</p><p></p><p>Source: [[https://cleanclothes.org/safety/ranaplaza|Clean Clothes Campaign]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Rana Plaza Arrangement website:</p><p>http://ranaplaza-arrangement.org/fund/donors</p><p></p><p>Review the list to determine if the company has made a contribution to the Rana Plaza Trust Fund. </p><p></p><p>Please provide the following contextual information in the comment to the metric value:</p><ul><li><p> whether or not it is publicly disclosed how much the company has donated</p></li><li><p>if disclosed, how much was donated</p></li><li><p>using [[https://cleanclothes.org/safety/ranaplaza/who-needs-to-pay-up|this list]] find out whether the company’s supply chain included any Rana Plaza facilities or whether it made a donation voluntarily regardless of their involvement </p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "No evidence found of involvement"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 59,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 59,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Compensation_Rana_Plaza_Victims+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3085559,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+Percentage hazardous waste recycled",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Percentage_hazardous_waste_recycled.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "Percentage hazardous waste recycled",
      "question": "What percentage of the organisation’s hazardous waste was recycled?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~836274"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~836246"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2681,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 1014,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Percentage_hazardous_waste_recycled+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3087109,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+Percentage non-hazardous waste recycled",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Percentage_non_hazardous_waste_recycled.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "Percentage non-hazardous waste recycled",
      "question": "What percentage of the organisation’s non-hazardous waste was recycled?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~837199"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~836262"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2616,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 1010,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Percentage_non_hazardous_waste_recycled+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3094810,
      "name": "Core+Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Guidelines",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Global_Reporting_Initiative_GRI_Guidelines.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Guidelines",
      "question": "Does the company report using the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Guidelines?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 273,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 84,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Global_Reporting_Initiative_GRI_Guidelines+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3094819,
      "name": "Core+Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Index",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Global_Reporting_Initiative_GRI_Index.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Index",
      "question": "Does the company report include an Index with GRI indicators?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Global_Reporting_Initiative_GRI_Index+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3094828,
      "name": "Core+Company Report Available",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Company_Report_Available.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Company Report Available",
      "question": "Does the company publish publicly an Annual Report, CSR Report or other major document that contains environmental, social, or governance data about the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Annual and sustainability reports are provided by many large and multinational enterprises, but even within these, corporate reporting varies. This metric asks whether companies provide publications containing information around their environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance, within an annual report, website, or other sources, to understand how and where these variations occur.</span></p>\r\n<p>Additionally this question helps to show whether small and medium sized companies are publishing this kind of information, and how this compares across geography and company size.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Many companies provide publications containing information around their environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. This question is meant to be answered on a year-by-year basis. Please cite the most appropriate report as the source. If you find no applicable report, answer “no” and cite the company’s website or other relevant page.</p>\r\n<p>To answer this question, search:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Google (or another search engine). “X csr report” or “X Annual Report”</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>The company’s website</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>The <a href=\"https://www.unglobalcompact.org/\" title=\"\"\"\" href=\"https://www.unglobalcompact.org/\"\"\">UN Global Compact website</a>. This contains reports of companies who are signatories to the Compact. Use the search bar and look for their Communication on Progress (COP) submissions to see if these contain any reports. Tip: statements of intent (that do not contain any ESG data) do not meet requirements for a ‘Yes’ answer. If a company COP does not report any concrete data on sustainability performance (like greenhouse gas emissions for example), and publishes no other CSR or Annual reports, the answer is 'No'.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>The Global Reporting Initiative’s <a href=\"http://database.globalreporting.org/\" title=\"\"\"\" href=\"http://database.globalreporting.org/\"\"\">Sustainability Disclosure Database</a></p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Check the Company’s Wikirate page. The sources may already include sustainability and annual reports for the year at which you are looking.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2239,
      "bookmarkers": 54,
      "datasets": 119,
      "companies": 813,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Business_Model_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Company_Report_Available+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3094857,
      "name": "Wolverines+Undergraduate Student Loan Debt",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wolverines+Undergraduate_Student_Loan_Debt.json",
      "designer": "Wolverines",
      "title": "Undergraduate Student Loan Debt",
      "question": "What is the average undergraduate student loan debt upon graduating?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Student loan debt</strong> is a form of debt that is owed by attending an institution. Student debt has important bearing on accessibility of higher education particularly to low- to middle- income students.</p><p>This metric was designed by a group of students at the University of Michigan who are interested in seeing further transparency on this topic. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Although not all universities report this statistic, there are some sources which provide this information. For example:</p><ul><li><p>[[http://www.collegefactual.com/|College Factual]]</p></li></ul><p>If you find additional sources please add them to the list above to help other researchers find the answer.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wolverines+Undergraduate_Student_Loan_Debt+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3095017,
      "name": "International Accord+Bangladesh Accord Signatory",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/International_Accord+Bangladesh_Accord_Signatory.json",
      "designer": "International Accord",
      "title": "Bangladesh Accord Signatory",
      "question": "Is the organization a signatory to the Bangladesh Accord?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>[[http://bangladeshaccord.org/about/|The Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh (the Accord)]] was signed on May 15th 2013. It is a five year independent, legally binding agreement between global brands and retailers and trade unions designed to build a safe and healthy Bangladeshi Ready Made Garment (RMG) Industry. The agreement was created in the immediate aftermath of the Rana Plaza building collapse that led to the death of more than 1100 people and injured more than 2000. In June 2013, an implementation plan was agreed leading to the incorporation of the Bangladesh Accord Foundation in the Netherlands in October 2013.</p>\r\n<p>The agreement consists of six key components:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>A five year legally binding agreement between brands and trade unions to ensure a safe working environment in the Bangladeshi RMG industry</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>An independent inspection program supported by brands in which workers and trade unions are involved</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Public disclosure of all factories, inspection reports and corrective action plans (CAP)</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>A commitment by signatory brands to ensure sufficient funds are available for remediation and to maintain sourcing relationships</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Democratically elected health and safety committees in all factories to identify and act on health and safety risks</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Worker empowerment through an extensive training program, complaints mechanism and right to refuse unsafe work.The Accord has been signed by over 200 apparel brands, retailers and importers from over 20 countries in Europe, North America, Asia and Australia; two global trade unions; and eight Bangladesh trade unions and four NGO witnesses.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<h4>Signatories</h4>\r\n<p>The Accord has been signed by over 200 apparel brands, retailers and importers from over 20 countries in Europe, North America, Asia and Australia; two global trade unions; and eight Bangladesh trade unions and four NGO witnesses.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The list of signatories can be accessed on the International Accord website: <a href=\"https://internationalaccord.org/signatories/?_signatory_categories=bangladesh\">https://internationalaccord.org/signatories/?_signatory_categories=bangladesh</a></p>\r\n<p><strong>Please note</strong>: The International Accord, the Bangladesh Accord, and the Pakistan Accord are separate, legally distinct agreements that operate under the same overarching framework and shared principles. Make sure you are using the company signatory list <strong>for the Bangladesh Accord only</strong>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Yes, not in good standing due to non-payment of membership fees",
        "Yes, Union",
        "Yes, Witness"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1414,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 10,
      "companies": 489,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/International_Accord+Bangladesh_Accord_Signatory+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3095028,
      "name": "International Accord+Bangladesh Accord Factory Covered",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/International_Accord+Bangladesh_Accord_Factory_Covered.json",
      "designer": "International Accord",
      "title": "Bangladesh Accord Factory Covered",
      "question": "Is the factory covered under the Accord inspection program? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>[[http://bangladeshaccord.org/about/|The Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh (the Accord)]] was signed on May 15th 2013. It is a five year independent, legally binding agreement between global brands and retailers and trade unions designed to build a safe and healthy Bangladeshi Ready Made Garment (RMG) Industry. The agreement was created in the immediate aftermath of the Rana Plaza building collapse that led to the death of more than 1100 people and injured more than 2000. In June 2013, an implementation plan was agreed leading to the incorporation of the Bangladesh Accord Foundation in the Netherlands in October 2013.</p>\r\n<p>The agreement consists of six key components:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>A five year legally binding agreement between brands and trade unions to ensure a safe working environment in the Bangladeshi RMG industry</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>An independent inspection program supported by brands in which workers and trade unions are involved</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Public disclosure of all factories, inspection reports and corrective action plans (CAP)</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>A commitment by signatory brands to ensure sufficient funds are available for remediation and to maintain sourcing relationships</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Democratically elected health and safety committees in all factories to identify and act on health and safety risks</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Worker empowerment through an extensive training program, complaints mechanism and right to refuse unsafe work.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<h4>Factories</h4>\r\n<p>All factories producing for Accord signatory companies are subject to independent inspections on fire, electrical and structural safety.</p>\r\n<p>Factories are inspected against the Accord Building Standards, which are largely based on the Bangladesh National Building Code and the product of discussions facilitated by the ILO between the Accord, the National Tripartite Plan of Action, and the Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety (Alliance).</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the Bangladesh Accord factory list on their website <a href=\"https://bangladeshaccord.org/factories\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://bangladeshaccord.org/factories</a><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> for recent years. For 2017, see list from September 2017 on Wikirate </span><a href=\"/Source_000048545\" target=\"_blank\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p>Review the list for the factory name. If the factory is listed as a supplier to an Accord signatory company, then it is covered under the Accord inspection program, choose the answer Yes.</p>\r\n<p>For all other factories (not producing for an Accord signatory, and not terminated), choose the answer No.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Terminated"
      ],
      "report_type": "Signatory List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/International_Accord+Bangladesh_Accord_Factory_Covered+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3095045,
      "name": "International Accord+Bangladesh Accord Supplier Terminated",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/International_Accord+Bangladesh_Accord_Supplier_Terminated.json",
      "designer": "International Accord",
      "title": "Bangladesh Accord Supplier Terminated",
      "question": "If the Suppliers whose business with Accord signatory companies has been terminated for reasons of workplace safety, please give the reason here.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>Suppliers whose business with Accord signatory companies has been terminated for reasons of workplace safety.</strong></p><p>Under the Accord (article 21), “each signatory company shall require that its suppliers in Bangladesh participate fully in the inspection, remediation, health and safety and, where applicable, training activities. If a supplier fails to do so, the signatory will promptly implement a notice and warning process leading to termination of the business relationship if these efforts do not succeed.”</p><p>Examples of a failure to participate include: refusal to temporarily evacuate the factory; lack of progress in finalizing corrective action plans or executing required safety renovations, refusal to resolve worker complaints on safety issues; lack of cooperation with Accord trainers, case handlers and engineers.</p><p>Suppliers listed below have gone through a process of notice and warning by the Accord and the signatory companies, but continue to inadequately participate in the Accord program. Accord signatory companies are required to terminate business with this supplier’s factories in such cases. For further information, please see the <strong><a href=\"http://bangladeshaccord.org/wp-content/uploads/Accord_escalation_flowchart_June_2017.pdf\">Accord Escalation Flowchart.</a></strong></p><p>The Accord policy on fraud will be zero tolerance. A supplier will be terminated with immediate effect where fraudulent acts by that supplier are verified.</p><p><strong>Criteria for identifying RMG company groups</strong><br>“RMG company” is the term used to describe a legal entity producing ready-made garments in one or more factories. “Group” refers to any aggregation of legal and/or natural persons sharing common control of suppliers. Control shall be presumed where there is common ownership, unless proven to the contrary.</p><p>Among the criteria the Accord will consider when deciding if a company is part of an RMG company group are the following:</p><ol><li><p>Companies are presented as a group in their own marketing materials (e.g websites, brochures, or business cards).</p></li><li><p>Companies are presented as being under the same management (e.g. having the same director(s) or same corporate email domain).</p></li><li><p>Registration document(s) of the Bangladesh Office of Registrar of Joint Stock Companies and firms.</p></li><li><p>Companies are listed in BGMEA or BKMEA registration books with the same owner.</p></li><li><p>Company ownership documents show group structures (e.g. Company registration, shareholder information, or annual reports).</p></li><li><p>A supplier has informed Accord or signatories that they own other companies or factory management has informed that they are part of a company group.</p></li><li><p>A company signatory has informed Accord that one of their suppliers is part of a group.</p></li><li><p>Other representations where a company has been presented as part of a group or as a “holding” (e.g. entries in trade association description of the company or group, biographies of owners, presentations of the company at industry conferences).</p></li></ol><p><strong>Requalification</strong><br>A terminated RMG company group may requalify for placement of business by an Accord signatory company after a period of no less than 24 months from the date of termination.</p><p>To requalify after such period, the RMG company group is required to demonstrate that all remediation from the Accord initial inspections at all affected RMG companies has been satisfactorily completed and that an acceptable, time bound corrective action plan is in place to correct any new findings identified after the initial inspections. It shall be the Accord Chief Safety Inspector who determines if initial remediation has been satisfactorily completed through an Accord verification inspection. The onus shall be on the terminated RMG company group, after the above-described 24 month period, to inform the Accord CSI that remediation has been completed and to request an Accord verification inspection.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the list of Terminated Suppliers on the Accord website:</p><p><a href=\"http://bangladeshaccord.org/terminated-suppliers/\" title=\"\"\"\">http://bangladeshaccord.org/terminated-suppliers/</a></p><p>This question should be answered only for Suppliers/Factories listed as Terminated on the Bangladesh Accord site.</p><p>If the Supplier or Factory has been terminated, choose the reason listed for termination:</p><ul><li><p>Failure to submit a Corrective Action Plan</p></li><li><p>Failure to implement workplace safety measures</p></li><li><p>Non-compliance with OSH Complaint Mechanism</p></li><li><p>Falsification of concrete strength test results</p></li><li><p>Refusal to temporarily evacuate factory</p></li><li><p>Refusal to cooperate in the Accord inspections</p></li><li><p>Refusal to implement workplace safety measures</p></li></ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Failure to submit a Corrective Action Plan",
        "Failure to implement workplace safety measures",
        "Non-compliance with OSH Complaint Mechanism",
        "Falsification of concrete strength test results",
        "Refusal to temporarily evacuate factory",
        "Refusal to implement workplace safety measures",
        "Refusal to cooperate in the Accord inspections"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 107,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/International_Accord+Bangladesh_Accord_Supplier_Terminated+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3096295,
      "name": "UN Global Compact+Sector",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/UN_Global_Compact+Sector.json",
      "designer": "UN Global Compact",
      "title": "Sector",
      "question": "What sector does the company operate in, according to the classification scheme used by the United Nations Global Compact?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Beverages",
        "Food Producers"
      ],
      "report_type": "UN Global Compact Organisation page",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 136,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 136,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/UN_Global_Compact+Sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3097354,
      "name": "UN Global Compact+Employee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/UN_Global_Compact+Employee.json",
      "designer": "UN Global Compact",
      "title": "Employee",
      "question": "How many employees does the company have? (according to their UN Global Compact profile page)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/UN_Global_Compact+Employee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3149461,
      "name": "Gloria Andrea Gomez Gomez+Reduction in CO2 emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Gloria_Andrea_Gomez_Gomez+Reduction_in_CO2_emissions.json",
      "designer": "Gloria Andrea Gomez Gomez",
      "title": "Reduction in CO2 emissions",
      "question": "How much has the CO2 emission reduce due to the recycling?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tons",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Gloria_Andrea_Gomez_Gomez+Reduction_in_CO2_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3149495,
      "name": "Gloria Andrea Gomez Gomez+Investment in recycle products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Gloria_Andrea_Gomez_Gomez+Investment_in_recycle_products.json",
      "designer": "Gloria Andrea Gomez Gomez",
      "title": "Investment in recycle products",
      "question": "How much money is invested in recyclable products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Gloria_Andrea_Gomez_Gomez+Investment_in_recycle_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3150401,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+Progress Scope 1 Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Progress_Scope_1_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "Progress Scope 1 Emissions",
      "question": "How has the Scope 1 Emissions changed over one year?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  (m1 / m2) * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~826615"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~826615",
          "year": "-1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3227,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 929,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Progress_Scope_1_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3170728,
      "name": "Alejandra Gómez+Anticorruption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alejandra_Gómez+Anticorruption.json",
      "designer": "Alejandra Gómez",
      "title": "Anticorruption",
      "question": "How does the Company work against corruption in all its forms, including extortion and bribery?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alejandra_Gómez+Anticorruption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3179459,
      "name": "Camila Saldarriaga+Waste Management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Camila_Saldarriaga+Waste_Management.json",
      "designer": "Camila Saldarriaga",
      "title": "Waste Management",
      "question": "How much did the use of waste after production increase (%)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Camila_Saldarriaga+Waste_Management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3179482,
      "name": "Camila Saldarriaga+C02 Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Camila_Saldarriaga+C02_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Camila Saldarriaga",
      "title": "C02 Emissions",
      "question": "How much does the CO2 emission reduce due to the correct use of resources?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 11,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Camila_Saldarriaga+C02_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3182652,
      "name": "Richard Mills+Incidents of discrimination per employee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Incidents_of_discrimination_per_employee.json",
      "designer": "Richard Mills",
      "title": "Incidents of discrimination per employee",
      "question": "How many incidents of discrimination were reported? Expressed as a ratio of “incidents per employee“",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~836314"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3437227"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3051,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1287,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Incidents_of_discrimination_per_employee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3183916,
      "name": "Universidad EAFIT Research Group - MAGP+Number of operating countries (G4-6)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Universidad_EAFIT_Research_Group_MAGP+Number_of_operating_countries_G4_6.json",
      "designer": "Universidad EAFIT Research Group - MAGP",
      "title": "Number of operating countries (G4-6)",
      "question": "What is the number of countries the company operates in?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "1-500",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Universidad_EAFIT_Research_Group_MAGP+Number_of_operating_countries_G4_6+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3186624,
      "name": "Mateo Fernandez Londoño+Amount of Consumed Water",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mateo_Fernandez_Londoño+Amount_of_Consumed_Water.json",
      "designer": "Mateo Fernandez Londoño",
      "title": "Amount of Consumed Water",
      "question": "How much water (m3) is used for industrial and logistics operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mateo_Fernandez_Londoño+Amount_of_Consumed_Water+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3186631,
      "name": "Mateo Fernandez Londoño+Energy Consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mateo_Fernandez_Londoño+Energy_Consumption.json",
      "designer": "Mateo Fernandez Londoño",
      "title": "Energy Consumption",
      "question": "How much energy consumption (in julios) does the company need in your total production?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mateo_Fernandez_Londoño+Energy_Consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3186638,
      "name": "Mateo Fernandez Londoño+CO2 Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mateo_Fernandez_Londoño+CO2_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Mateo Fernandez Londoño",
      "title": "CO2 Emissions",
      "question": "How much was the CO2 emission?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mateo_Fernandez_Londoño+CO2_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3186682,
      "name": "Mateo Fernandez Londoño+Waste Management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mateo_Fernandez_Londoño+Waste_Management.json",
      "designer": "Mateo Fernandez Londoño",
      "title": "Waste Management",
      "question": "How much did the use of waste after production increase (tonn)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mateo_Fernandez_Londoño+Waste_Management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3188145,
      "name": "Valentina Gomez+female employee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+female_employee.json",
      "designer": "Valentina Gomez",
      "title": "female employee",
      "question": "How many female employees does the company have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Data Breach Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+female_employee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3188198,
      "name": "Valentina Gomez+Greenhouse gas reduce",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+Greenhouse_gas_reduce.json",
      "designer": "Valentina Gomez",
      "title": "Greenhouse gas reduce",
      "question": "What is the organization’s Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reduce?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+Greenhouse_gas_reduce+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3188210,
      "name": "Valentina Gomez+Number of wholesalers customers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+Number_of_wholesalers_customers.json",
      "designer": "Valentina Gomez",
      "title": "Number of wholesalers customers",
      "question": "How many number of wholesalers customers does the company have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+Number_of_wholesalers_customers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3188286,
      "name": "Valentina Gomez+Contractors",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+Contractors.json",
      "designer": "Valentina Gomez",
      "title": "Contractors",
      "question": "How man contractors does the company have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+Contractors+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3188310,
      "name": "Valentina Gomez+Ending customers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+Ending_customers.json",
      "designer": "Valentina Gomez",
      "title": "Ending customers",
      "question": "How many industrial ending customers does the company have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+Ending_customers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3188328,
      "name": "Valentina Gomez+Level of compliace",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+Level_of_compliace.json",
      "designer": "Valentina Gomez",
      "title": "Level of compliace",
      "question": "What is the level of compliance of the global compact?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+Level_of_compliace+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3188520,
      "name": "Valentina Gomez+Jobs generate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+Jobs_generate.json",
      "designer": "Valentina Gomez",
      "title": "Jobs generate",
      "question": "How many job does the company generate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+Jobs_generate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3188537,
      "name": "Valentina Gomez+Community projects",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+Community_projects.json",
      "designer": "Valentina Gomez",
      "title": "Community projects",
      "question": "Does the company have community projects?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+Community_projects+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3188554,
      "name": "Valentina Gomez+number of Community projects",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+number_of_Community_projects.json",
      "designer": "Valentina Gomez",
      "title": "number of Community projects",
      "question": "How many community project does the company have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+number_of_Community_projects+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3188565,
      "name": "Valentina Gomez+Compliace",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+Compliace.json",
      "designer": "Valentina Gomez",
      "title": "Compliace",
      "question": "What is the level of compliance ?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Valentina_Gomez+Compliace+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3191456,
      "name": "Philipp Kuehl+Groundwater per employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Philipp_Kuehl+Groundwater_per_employees.json",
      "designer": "Philipp Kuehl",
      "title": "Groundwater per employees",
      "question": "How much water does the company consume per employee?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~801561"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~836097"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1816,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 766,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Philipp_Kuehl+Groundwater_per_employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3193616,
      "name": "Alice NEOMA+CEO Gender",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alice_NEOMA+CEO_Gender.json",
      "designer": "Alice NEOMA",
      "title": "CEO Gender",
      "question": "Is the company's CEO male or female?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was created to capture information on the gender of companies top leaders - CEOs. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This information should be found in companies' annual and sustainability reports, as well as on their website. </p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Man",
        "Woman"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 593,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 28,
      "companies": 313,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alice_NEOMA+CEO_Gender+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3206217,
      "name": "OpenCorporates+Has Brands",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+Has_Brands.json",
      "designer": "OpenCorporates",
      "title": "Has Brands",
      "question": "What brands does this company own?",
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": "<p>Brands are the customer facing version of companies. Sometimes a company will have several brands and might implement different principles and values that guide their operational decisions for each brand. As such it is helpful to understand how a company may operate differently depending on which customer group they are trying to serve.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+Has_Brands+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3206224,
      "name": "OpenCorporates+Is Brand Of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+Is_Brand_Of.json",
      "designer": "OpenCorporates",
      "title": "Is Brand Of",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+Is_Brand_Of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3206235,
      "name": "Commons+Address",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Address.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Address",
      "question": "What is the company / facility’s address?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Disclosing where a company or production facility is located is one of the first steps in communicating about it’s business practices transparently. Sharing this information makes it possible to understand the local context in which the company and it’s workforce operate, as well as that it opens the door to unannounced independent auditing or visits.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking for the address of a specific company or facility. Start by searching on the company’s website for an address or supplier list and within their published documents such as annual reports and sustainability reports.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords and Search Terms</strong></p>\r\n<p>- Supplier list</p>\r\n<p>- Address</p>\r\n<p>- Location</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answer Input</strong></p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information. </p>\r\n<p>The answer to the metric can be entered as free text. Please use commas to separate each line of the address. </p>\r\n<p>If you have looked for the information and have not been able to find it, enter the answer as ‘Unknown’.</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 156871,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 9,
      "companies": 96825,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_suppliers_with_disclosed_address.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Address+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3208244,
      "name": "Alex H+Percentage of Permanent Employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alex_H+Percentage_of_Permanent_Employees.json",
      "designer": "Alex H",
      "title": "Percentage of Permanent Employees",
      "question": "What percentage of employees are on a permanent contract?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~836128"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~836097"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2146,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1015,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alex_H+Percentage_of_Permanent_Employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3211321,
      "name": "ADJALLAH YOANN+Water Used By the Company",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ADJALLAH_YOANN+Water_Used_By_the_Company.json",
      "designer": "ADJALLAH YOANN",
      "title": "Water Used By the Company",
      "question": "What is the Waater consumption of the company in liters?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ADJALLAH_YOANN+Water_Used_By_the_Company+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3212663,
      "name": "ADJALLAH YOANN+Total Waste Recycled",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ADJALLAH_YOANN+Total_Waste_Recycled.json",
      "designer": "ADJALLAH YOANN",
      "title": "Total Waste Recycled",
      "question": "What is the percentage of the recycled Waste",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 17,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ADJALLAH_YOANN+Total_Waste_Recycled+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3213354,
      "name": "Agathe Parois+Annual energy consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Agathe_Parois+Annual_energy_consumption.json",
      "designer": "Agathe Parois",
      "title": "Annual energy consumption",
      "question": "What is the annual energy consumption of the company? (in GWh)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 11,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Agathe_Parois+Annual_energy_consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3213383,
      "name": "Agathe Parois+percentage of women within the board of director",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Agathe_Parois+percentage_of_women_within_the_board_of_director.json",
      "designer": "Agathe Parois",
      "title": "percentage of women within the board of director",
      "question": "percentage of women within the board of director",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Agathe_Parois+percentage_of_women_within_the_board_of_director+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3213402,
      "name": "Agathe Parois+Number of sites certified  ISO 14001",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Agathe_Parois+Number_of_sites_certified_ISO_14001.json",
      "designer": "Agathe Parois",
      "title": "Number of sites certified  ISO 14001",
      "question": "What is the Number of sites certified ISO 14001?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Agathe_Parois+Number_of_sites_certified_ISO_14001+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3213453,
      "name": "Agathe Parois+Percentage of natural & renewable gas use annualy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Agathe_Parois+Percentage_of_natural_renewable_gas_use_annualy.json",
      "designer": "Agathe Parois",
      "title": "Percentage of natural & renewable gas use annualy",
      "question": "What is the percentage of natural &amp; renewable gas use annualy ?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Agathe_Parois+Percentage_of_natural_renewable_gas_use_annualy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3213652,
      "name": "Lu Han+Promotion of diversity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Lu_Han+Promotion_of_diversity.json",
      "designer": "Lu Han",
      "title": "Promotion of diversity",
      "question": "Does the company have any internal diversity programs or policies?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The answer can be found on companies’ official websites, annual reports, CSR reports, etc.</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Lu_Han+Promotion_of_diversity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3214177,
      "name": "Madina Ba+Frequency of injuries",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Madina_Ba+Frequency_of_injuries.json",
      "designer": "Madina Ba",
      "title": "Frequency of injuries",
      "question": "What is the frequency of incidents per specific period of time ?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Madina_Ba+Frequency_of_injuries+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3214195,
      "name": "marion gueneugues+overall employee satisfaction",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/marion_gueneugues+overall_employee_satisfaction.json",
      "designer": "marion gueneugues",
      "title": "overall employee satisfaction",
      "question": "how well the company satisfy employee’s needs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/marion_gueneugues+overall_employee_satisfaction+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3214303,
      "name": "marion gueneugues+Absenteeism rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/marion_gueneugues+Absenteeism_rate.json",
      "designer": "marion gueneugues",
      "title": "Absenteeism rate",
      "question": "What is the total rate of absenteeism ?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/marion_gueneugues+Absenteeism_rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3214329,
      "name": "Madina Ba+Numbers of hours of training per employee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Madina_Ba+Numbers_of_hours_of_training_per_employee.json",
      "designer": "Madina Ba",
      "title": "Numbers of hours of training per employee",
      "question": "How many hours of training does an employee get ?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Madina_Ba+Numbers_of_hours_of_training_per_employee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3214350,
      "name": "marion gueneugues+Women's Empowerment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/marion_gueneugues+Women_s_Empowerment.json",
      "designer": "marion gueneugues",
      "title": "Women's Empowerment",
      "question": "How big is the percentage of women at managing positions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/marion_gueneugues+Women_s_Empowerment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3214373,
      "name": "Madina Ba+Accident severity rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Madina_Ba+Accident_severity_rate.json",
      "designer": "Madina Ba",
      "title": "Accident severity rate",
      "question": "Numbers of accident per million of hours worked .",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Madina_Ba+Accident_severity_rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3214398,
      "name": "ali asadi , demilade olowosuko+Gender Equality",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ali_asadi_demilade_olowosuko+Gender_Equality.json",
      "designer": "ali asadi , demilade olowosuko",
      "title": "Gender Equality",
      "question": "What has been done to improve Gender Gap ? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ali_asadi_demilade_olowosuko+Gender_Equality+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3214410,
      "name": "ali asadi , demilade olowosuko+Atmospheric pollution",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ali_asadi_demilade_olowosuko+Atmospheric_pollution.json",
      "designer": "ali asadi , demilade olowosuko",
      "title": "Atmospheric pollution",
      "question": "What has been done for Atmospheric pollution? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ali_asadi_demilade_olowosuko+Atmospheric_pollution+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3214425,
      "name": "ali asadi , demilade olowosuko+Gas Emission",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ali_asadi_demilade_olowosuko+Gas_Emission.json",
      "designer": "ali asadi , demilade olowosuko",
      "title": "Gas Emission",
      "question": "What has been down for gas emission ? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ali_asadi_demilade_olowosuko+Gas_Emission+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3214435,
      "name": "ali asadi , demilade olowosuko+Risk Management Enviroment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ali_asadi_demilade_olowosuko+Risk_Management_Enviroment.json",
      "designer": "ali asadi , demilade olowosuko",
      "title": "Risk Management Enviroment",
      "question": "Land and Water ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ali_asadi_demilade_olowosuko+Risk_Management_Enviroment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3214745,
      "name": "Barbara LEPERRE+Human Rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Barbara_LEPERRE+Human_Rights.json",
      "designer": "Barbara LEPERRE",
      "title": "Human Rights",
      "question": "How does the company address human rights ?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Efficiently",
        "Poorly",
        "Does not adress human rights"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 7,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Barbara_LEPERRE+Human_Rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3215292,
      "name": "Lu Han+Women in executive committees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Lu_Han+Women_in_executive_committees.json",
      "designer": "Lu Han",
      "title": "Women in executive committees",
      "question": "What is the percentage of women in Executive Committees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Lu_Han+Women_in_executive_committees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3215341,
      "name": "ADJALLAH YOANN+Training on Ethics",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ADJALLAH_YOANN+Training_on_Ethics.json",
      "designer": "ADJALLAH YOANN",
      "title": "Training on Ethics",
      "question": "How many employees have completed a training on Ethics",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ADJALLAH_YOANN+Training_on_Ethics+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3218329,
      "name": "Wesley+Ethics",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wesley+Ethics.json",
      "designer": "Wesley",
      "title": "Ethics",
      "question": "What is the company's strategy for sustainability ?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wesley+Ethics+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3218339,
      "name": "Wesley+Equality in the workforce",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wesley+Equality_in_the_workforce.json",
      "designer": "Wesley",
      "title": "Equality in the workforce",
      "question": "How does the company create equality in the workforce ?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wesley+Equality_in_the_workforce+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3233883,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Male Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Male_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Male Workers",
      "question": "What is the percentage of male workers at the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 29763,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 11,
      "companies": 19103,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Male_Supply_Chain_Workers_Disclosed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Percentage_of_Female_Employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Male_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3233894,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Female Workers %",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Female_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Female Workers %",
      "question": "What is the percentage of female workers at the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 31794,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 11,
      "companies": 20226,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Female_Supply_Chain_Workers_Disclosed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Percentage_of_Female_Employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Female_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3238230,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Approximate Number of Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Approximate_Number_of_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Approximate Number of Workers",
      "question": "What is the approximate number of workers of the company",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4188,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 4084,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Approximate_Number_of_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3283908,
      "name": "Alex H+Total number of students",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alex_H+Total_number_of_students.json",
      "designer": "Alex H",
      "title": "Total number of students",
      "question": "What is the total number of students at the institution (teaching and research)? ",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alex_H+Total_number_of_students+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3316848,
      "name": "UN Global Compact+UNGC Participant",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/UN_Global_Compact+UNGC_Participant.json",
      "designer": "UN Global Compact",
      "title": "UNGC Participant",
      "question": "Is the company or organization a signatory to the UN Global Compact?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The <strong>UN Global Compact </strong>is a voluntary initiative based on CEO commitments to implement universal sustainability principles and to take steps to support UN goals.</p>\r\n<p>Participants are required to:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong>Attain commitment from the chief executive (or equivalent, for non-business entities) – with support from the Board</strong>. This commits the organization to meet fundamental responsibilities in four areas: human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption. All four areas are important; responsible businesses know that good practices in one area do not offset harm in another.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong>Produce an annual Communication on Progress (COP) report that outlines its efforts to operate responsibly and support society</strong>. This could be part of a sustainability or annual report, or another public document. UN Global Compact posts these communications on their website, and more than 28,000 have been issued by participants to date.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ol>",
      "methodology": "<p>Check the UN Global Compact website's [[https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/participants/|list of participants.]]</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong>Answer ‘Yes’</strong> if the company or organization is a current participant for the year you are researching.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong>Answer ‘No’</strong> if you do not find that the organization is a participant.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Additional metrics on UN Global Compact companies are here - including ‘Status’, ‘Participant Since’, and ‘COP Reporting Level’: <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/UN_Global_Compact\" title=\"\"\" href=\"http://wikirate.org/UN_Global_Compact\"\">http://wikirate.org/UN_Global_Compact</a></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 170,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 124,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/UN_Global_Compact+UNGC_Participant+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3331651,
      "name": "Wikirate SDG Metric design+Water use per $ Profit",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Water_use_per_Profit.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate SDG Metric design",
      "title": "Water use per $ Profit",
      "question": "How many litres of water were used per dollar of profit generated?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is based on </span><span>UNCTAD proposed core SDGs reporting indicators </span><span>B.1</span></p>\r\n<p><span>SDG 6: Disclosures 6.4</span><span></span></p>\r\n<p><span>Calls for: </span><span>Liters per unit of $ currency</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 * 1000 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~801164"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3413593"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1316,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 570,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Water_use_per_Profit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3341261,
      "name": "Core+Gross Profits",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Gross_Profits.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Gross Profits",
      "question": "How much gross profit did the company make (in USD)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is for recording a company's Gross Profit: Revenue - Cost of Sales</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Gross Profit should be reported in any company's Annual Report. It may also be possible to find this information in other sources. Any source is acceptable, but in case of discrepancy the official Annual Report should be taken as the correct answer.</p>\r\n<p>Where a company reports profits for their financial year, which differs from the calander year, the answer should be assigned to the earlier year. So for example if a company's annual report runs from September 2016 - September 2017 the year should be 2016.</p>\r\n<p>The <strong>Monetary unit for this metric is US Dollars</strong>. If the value is reported in a currency other than US dollars, please consult convert to USD, and <strong>add conversion details</strong> in the comments section. The following website provides yearly average conversion rates: http://www.mawnlawconsulting.com/yearly-exchange-rates</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1664,
      "bookmarkers": 10,
      "datasets": 45,
      "companies": 520,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Gross_Profits.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Higher_School_of_Economics_Research_Group_2020+From_Farm_to_Fork_2020_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Gross_Profits+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3341320,
      "name": "Core+Revenue",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Revenue.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Revenue",
      "question": "What was the company's total revenue (or sales) for the year (in USD)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In accounting, revenue is the income that a business has from its normal business activities, usually from the sale of goods and services to customers. Revenue is also referred to as sales or turnover. </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Revenue should be reported in any company's Annual Report. It may also be possible to find this information in other sources. Any source is acceptable, but in case of discrepancy the official Annual Report should be taken as the correct answer.</p>\r\n<p>Where a company reports revenue for their financial year, which differs from the calander year, the answer should be assigned to the earlier year. So for example if a company's annual report runs from September 2016 - September 2017 the year should be 2016.</p>\r\n<p>The <strong>Monetary unit for this metric is US Dollars ($)</strong>. If the value is reported in a currency other than US dollars, please consult convert to USD, and <strong>add conversion details</strong> in the comments section. The following website provides yearly average conversion rates: http://www.mawnlawconsulting.com/yearly-exchange-rates</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3441,
      "bookmarkers": 13,
      "datasets": 133,
      "companies": 1014,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Wollongong_Research_Group_2020+Wollongong_2020_Climate_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Higher_School_of_Economics_Research_Group_2020+From_Farm_to_Fork_2020_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Economic_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Gershon_M_Bialer+CO2e_Intensity.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Revenue.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Annual_Revenue.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Revenue+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3341341,
      "name": "Core+Employee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Employee.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Employee",
      "question": "What is the company's total number of employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The size of a workforce provides insight into the scale of impacts created by labor issues. It is also used as a basis for calculations with other indicators as a measure of a company's size and impact. Monitoring the size of a company's workforce over time is an important basis for measuring a company's economic development and sustainability. </p>\r\n<p>The total number of employees in a company includes both full-time and part-time members of a workforce.  </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Number of employees may be reported in a company's sustainability report, annual report and/or integrated report. The company may also report these figures directly on their website.</p>\r\n<p>To find the answer, try searching in these documents for keywords such as 'employee', 'workforce' or 'personnel'. The company may report this figure in a section of their report focused on their workforce, they may also include the figure in a summary data page at the beginning of a report. </p>\r\n<p>Add a comment documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of any calculations you made. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2063,
      "bookmarkers": 35,
      "datasets": 90,
      "companies": 882,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Employee.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Wollongong_Research_Group_2020+Wollongong_2020_Climate_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Number_of_employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Employee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3400461,
      "name": "Susana+Accidentalidad colaboradores hombres",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Susana+Accidentalidad_colaboradores_hombres.json",
      "designer": "Susana",
      "title": "Accidentalidad colaboradores hombres",
      "question": "Cuál es la cifra de accidentalidad de hombres?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Accidentes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Susana+Accidentalidad_colaboradores_hombres+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3400482,
      "name": "Susana+Accidentalidad colaboradores mujeres",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Susana+Accidentalidad_colaboradores_mujeres.json",
      "designer": "Susana",
      "title": "Accidentalidad colaboradores mujeres",
      "question": "Cuál es la cifra de accidentalidad de mujeres colaboradoras?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Accidentes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Susana+Accidentalidad_colaboradores_mujeres+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3400501,
      "name": "Susana+Accidentalidad contratistas hombres",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Susana+Accidentalidad_contratistas_hombres.json",
      "designer": "Susana",
      "title": "Accidentalidad contratistas hombres",
      "question": "Cuál es la cifra de accidentalidad de contratistas hombres?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Accidentes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Susana+Accidentalidad_contratistas_hombres+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3400518,
      "name": "Susana+Accidentalidad contratistas mujeres",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Susana+Accidentalidad_contratistas_mujeres.json",
      "designer": "Susana",
      "title": "Accidentalidad contratistas mujeres",
      "question": "Cuál es la cifra de accidentalidad de mujeres contratistas?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Accidentes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Susana+Accidentalidad_contratistas_mujeres+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3400537,
      "name": "Susana+Horas de formación",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Susana+Horas_de_formación.json",
      "designer": "Susana",
      "title": "Horas de formación",
      "question": "Cúantas horas son destinadas a formación?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Horas",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Susana+Horas_de_formación+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3400562,
      "name": "Susana+Multas ambientales",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Susana+Multas_ambientales.json",
      "designer": "Susana",
      "title": "Multas ambientales",
      "question": "Que multas tuvo la compañía en valor monetario por no acatar las leyes y regulaciones ambientales ?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Susana+Multas_ambientales+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3400577,
      "name": "Susana+Emisiones de óxido de azufre",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Susana+Emisiones_de_óxido_de_azufre.json",
      "designer": "Susana",
      "title": "Emisiones de óxido de azufre",
      "question": "Cuantas toneladas de óxido de azufre emite la compañía?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Toneladas",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Susana+Emisiones_de_óxido_de_azufre+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3400601,
      "name": "Susana+Emisión de material particulado",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Susana+Emisión_de_material_particulado.json",
      "designer": "Susana",
      "title": "Emisión de material particulado",
      "question": "Cuantas toneladas de material particulado genera la compañía?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Toneladas",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Susana+Emisión_de_material_particulado+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3400623,
      "name": "Susana+Emisión de exafluoruro de azufre",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Susana+Emisión_de_exafluoruro_de_azufre.json",
      "designer": "Susana",
      "title": "Emisión de exafluoruro de azufre",
      "question": "Cuantas toneladas de exafluoruro de azufre genera la compañía?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Toneladas",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Susana+Emisión_de_exafluoruro_de_azufre+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3401041,
      "name": "Leonardo  Herrera+Residuos",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Leonardo_Herrera+Residuos.json",
      "designer": "Leonardo  Herrera",
      "title": "Residuos",
      "question": "Cuantas toneladas de residuos generó la organización?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Toneladas",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Leonardo_Herrera+Residuos+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3401112,
      "name": "Alejandro Parra+Tasa de rotación",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alejandro_Parra+Tasa_de_rotación.json",
      "designer": "Alejandro Parra",
      "title": "Tasa de rotación",
      "question": "Que tasa de rotación de colaboradores hay en la compañía?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alejandro_Parra+Tasa_de_rotación+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3401129,
      "name": "Alejandro Parra+Captación de agua",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alejandro_Parra+Captación_de_agua.json",
      "designer": "Alejandro Parra",
      "title": "Captación de agua",
      "question": "Cuantos m3 capta la compañía?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alejandro_Parra+Captación_de_agua+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3402646,
      "name": "Sarah Bolaño+Tasa de accidentalidad laboral",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sarah_Bolaño+Tasa_de_accidentalidad_laboral.json",
      "designer": "Sarah Bolaño",
      "title": "Tasa de accidentalidad laboral",
      "question": "Tasa de accidentalidad laboral",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sarah_Bolaño+Tasa_de_accidentalidad_laboral+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3411227,
      "name": "Commons+Revenue",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Revenue.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Revenue",
      "question": "What was the company's total revenue (or sales) for the year (in USD)?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In accounting, revenue is the income that a business has from its normal business activities, usually from the sale of goods and services to customers. Revenue is also referred to as sales or turnover. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Revenue should be reported in any company's Annual Report. It may also be possible to find this information in other sources. Any source is acceptable, but in case of discrepancy the official Annual Report should be taken as the correct answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Where a company reports revenue for their financial year, which differs from the calander year, the answer should be assigned to the earlier year. So for example if a company's annual report runs from September 2016 - September 2017 the year should be 2016.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Monetary unit for this metric is US Dollars</span>. If the value is reported in a currency other than US dollars, please consult convert to USD, and <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">add conversion details</span> in the comments section. The following website provides yearly average conversion rates: https://www.ofx.com/en-gb/forex-news/historical-exchange-rates/yearly-average-rates/</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~1884089"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~3341320"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~14312111"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 41069,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 9,
      "companies": 6497,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Greenhouse_gas_emissions_per_dollar_revenue.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Energy_consumption_per_dollar_of_revenue.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Water_use_per_dollar_revenue.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Water_use_per_dollar_of_revenue.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Environmental_Protection_as_of_revenue.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2021+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Revenue+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3413593,
      "name": "Commons+Gross Profits",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Gross_Profits.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Gross Profits",
      "question": "How much gross profit did the company make (in USD)?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": "<p>This metric brings together data about Gross Profit (sometimes called Gross Margin) from other metrics which have this kind of data. Data can also be added directly to this metric, or edited here.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Gross Profit should be reported in any company's Annual Report. It may also be possible to find this information in other sources. Any source is acceptable, but in case of discrepancy the official Annual Report should be taken as the correct answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Where a company reports profits for their financial year, which differs from the calander year, the answer should be assigned to the earlier year. So for example if a company's annual report runs from September 2016 - September 2017 the year should be 2016.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Monetary unit for this metric is US Dollars</span>. If the value is reported in a currency other than US dollars, please consult convert to USD, and <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">add conversion details</span> in the comments section. The following website provides yearly average conversion rates: <a href=\"https://www.ofx.com/en-gb/forex-news/historical-exchange-rates/yearly-average-rates/\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.ofx.com/en-gb/forex-news/historical-exchange-rates/yearly-average-rates/</a></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~2228389"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~3341261"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 32244,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 3768,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_SDG_Metric_design+Water_use_per_Profit.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Greenhouse_Gas_emissions_per_dollar_profit.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Energy_consumption_per_dollar_of_profit.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Energy_consumption_per_dollar_profit.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Gross_Profits+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3414422,
      "name": "Commons+Water Use",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Water_Use.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Water Use",
      "question": "How much water did the company use? (in cubic metres)",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Business Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~801164"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2554759"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3011,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1156,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Water_Use+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3415560,
      "name": "Commons+Energy Consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Energy_Consumption.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Energy Consumption",
      "question": "How much energy did the company consume? (in GigaJoules)",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~846580"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3926,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1358,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Energy_consumption_per_dollar_of_revenue.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Energy_consumption_per_dollar_of_profit.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Energy_consumption_per_dollar_profit.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Energy_consumption_per_employee.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Energy_Consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3415940,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+Energy consumption per dollar profit",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Energy_consumption_per_dollar_profit.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "Energy consumption per dollar profit",
      "question": "How much energy was consumed per dollar of gross profit generated? ",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3415560"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3413593"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1553,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 626,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Energy_consumption_per_dollar_profit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3416183,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+Water use per dollar revenue",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Water_use_per_dollar_revenue.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "Water use per dollar revenue",
      "question": "How many litres of water did the company use per dollar of revenue generated?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "litres per $ revenue",
      "range": "",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 * 1000 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~801164"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3411227"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1533,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 715,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Water_use_per_dollar_revenue+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3430748,
      "name": "Commons+Greenhouse Gas Emissions Scope 1",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_1.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Scope 1",
      "question": "What were the company's direct (scope 1) greenhouse gas emissions (in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent)?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "metric tonnes of CO2 eq",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~170546"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~826615"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 5524,
      "bookmarkers": 6,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1694,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_1_and_2_combined.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Combined_Scope_1_2_and_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_GHG.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3431550,
      "name": "Commons+Greenhouse Gas Emissions Scope 2",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_2.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Scope 2",
      "question": "What were the company's indirect (scope 2) greenhouse gas emissions (in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent)?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~169665"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~826629"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 5239,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1659,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_1_and_2_combined.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Combined_Scope_1_2_and_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_GHG.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3432335,
      "name": "Commons+Greenhouse Gas Emissions Scope 1 and 2 combined",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_1_and_2_combined.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Scope 1 and 2 combined",
      "question": "What were the company's cumilative direct (scope 1) and indirect (scope 2) greenhouse gas emissions (in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric's value shows the company's cumulative direct (Scope 1) and indirect (Scope 2) greenhouse gas emissions in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent. As shown above, the metric is an automatized formula that adds the researched values (if available) for Greenhouse Gass Emissions Scope 1 and the Greenhouse Gass Emissions Scope 2.</p>\r\n<p>Learn more about how to create calculated and formula metrics on Wikirate <a href=\"/About_Metrics\">here</a>.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 + m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3430748"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3431550"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 5135,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 1636,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Greenhouse_Gas_emissions_per_dollar_profit.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Greenhouse_Gas_emissions_per_employee.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Greenhouse_gas_emissions_per_dollar_revenue.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+Yearly_Change_Scope_1_and_2_Emissions.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Direct_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_1_and_Indirect_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_2_per_Vehicle_Produced.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_1_and_2_combined+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3433103,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+Greenhouse Gas emissions per dollar profit",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Greenhouse_Gas_emissions_per_dollar_profit.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "Greenhouse Gas emissions per dollar profit",
      "question": "How many tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions (scope 1+2 combined, CO2 equivalent) did the company report per each dollar of profit?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3432335"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3413593"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1724,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 661,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Greenhouse_Gas_emissions_per_dollar_profit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3436611,
      "name": "Commons+female employee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+female_employee.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "female employee",
      "question": "How many female employees does the company have?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "female employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~837241"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 4470,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1965,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+female_employee.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+female_employee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3437215,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+female employee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+female_employee.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "female employee",
      "question": "What percentage of the company’s employees are female?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3436611"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3437227"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 4173,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 1847,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+female_employee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3437227,
      "name": "Commons+Employee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Employee.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Employee",
      "question": "How many employees does the company have?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~836097"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2917748"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~3341341"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8674786"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 69189,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 11,
      "companies": 13309,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+female_employee.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Greenhouse_Gas_emissions_per_employee.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Worker_fatalities_of_workforce.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Incidents_of_discrimination_per_employee.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Laureen_van_Breen+Scope_1_GHG_over_number_of_employees.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Energy_consumption_per_employee.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Employee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3446414,
      "name": "Core+Living Wage Policy (direct employees)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Living_Wage_Policy_direct_employees.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Living Wage Policy (direct employees)",
      "question": "Is the company committed to paying its own workers a living wage?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on a set of indicators from the [[https://www.corporatebenchmark.org/guide-benchmark|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark]]. Specifically, it is based on indicator D1.1.a/D2.1.a/D3.1 from the [[https://www.corporatebenchmark.org/sites/default/files/CHRB%202018%20Methodology%20Web%20Version.pdf|2018 methodology]].</p>\r\n<p>The indicator is described as follows:</p>\r\n<p>\"The Company pays all its workers a living wage, which is regularly reviewed and negotiated through collective bargaining with relevant trade unions where they are operating. There are numerous definitions of living wage but the core concept is to provide a decent standard of living for a worker and his or her family based on a regular work week not including overtime hours. A living wage is sufficient to cover food, water, clothing, transport, education, health care and other essential needs for workers and their entitled official dependents and provide some discretionary income. Workers also receive equal pay for equal work.\"</p>\r\n<p>The categories for this metric have been determined by considering CHRB's scoring criteria.</p>\r\n<p>The CHRB sets the following criteria for awarding a <strong>Score of 1</strong>:</p>\r\n<div>The Company indicates its target timeframe for paying all workers a living wage AND the Company describes how it determines a living wage for the regions where it operates, which includes involvement of relevant trade unions.</div>\r\n<div> </div>\r\n<div>The CHRB sets the following criteria for awarding a <strong>Score of 2</strong>:</div>\r\n<div>As well as describing how it determines a living wage for the regions where it operates, the Company indicates that it has</div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>achieved paying the living wage AND that it regularly reviews its definition of the living wage including with relevant trade unions</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company has <strong>committed to paying its own workers</strong> (direct employees) a living wage.</p>\r\n<p>Information about this metric could be found in a company's sustainability report or corporate social responsibility report, but it may also be found in other documents the company has published detailing its policies on payment of workers.</p>\r\n<p>This metric is about collecting data on how living wage policies are described, it is therefore <strong>important to include quotations from sources that describe the company's living wage policies/practices.</strong></p>\r\n<p>Answer options should be selected as follows:</p>\r\n<p><strong>No Living Wage Policy: </strong>Where the company does not refer to a policy of paying workers a living wage or refer to this concept in a description of how pay rates are set.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Living Wage mentioned:</strong> Where the company refers to the concept of a living wage in relation to their employees</p>\r\n<p><strong>Living Wage Timeframe set: </strong>Where the company sets a target time by which all of its workers will be paid a living wage.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Living Wage Methodology described: </strong>Where the company describes how the rate of pay which constitutes a living wage is determined.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Living Wage Achieved:</strong> Where the company explains how the living wage has been determined for the regions in which it operates <strong>and</strong> <strong>states that all workers are currently receiving a living wage.</strong></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If no such policy is found, the answer is </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">No Living Wage Policy</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> (</span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">not Unknown</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">).</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Living Wage Policy",
        "Living Wage mentioned",
        "Living Wage Timeframe set",
        "Living Wage Methodology described",
        "Living Wage Achieved"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG1 - No Poverty",
        "UN SDGs+SDG1.1 Eradicate extreme poverty everywhere.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG1.4 Ensure equal access to resources, services, property, and finance for all."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1556,
      "bookmarkers": 6,
      "datasets": 50,
      "companies": 753,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Living_Wage_Policy_direct_employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3446430,
      "name": "Core+Living Wage Policy (supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Living_Wage_Policy_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Living Wage Policy (supply chain)",
      "question": "Is the company committed to ensuring that workers in its supply chain receive a Living Wage?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on a set of indicators from the [[https://www.corporatebenchmark.org/guide-benchmark|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark]]. Specifically, it is based on indicator D1.1.b/D2.1.b from the [[https://www.corporatebenchmark.org/sites/default/files/CHRB%202018%20Methodology%20Web%20Version.pdf|2018 methodology]].</p>\r\n<p>The indicator is described as follows:</p>\r\n<p>\"The Company ensures its suppliers pay their workers a living wage, which is regularly reviewed and negotiated through collective bargaining with relevant trade unions where they are operating. There are numerous definitions of living wage but the core concept is to provide a decent standard of living for a worker and his or her family based on a regular work week not including overtime hours. A living wage is sufficient to cover food, water, clothing, transport, education, health care and other essential needs for workers and their entitled official dependents and provide some discretionary income. Workers also receive equal pay for equal work.\"</p>\r\n<p>The categories for this metric have been determined by considering CHRB's scoring criteria.</p>\r\n<p>The CHRB sets the following criteria for awarding a <strong>Score of 1</strong>:</p>\r\n<p>The Company includes living wage guidelines in its contractual arrangements with its suppliers or its supplier code of conduct OR the Company describes how it works with suppliers to improve their living wage practices.</p>\r\n<div>The CHRB sets the following criteria for awarding a <strong>Score of 2</strong>:</div>\r\n<div>The Company meets both of the requirements under Score 1 AND provides an analysis of trends in progress made.</div>",
      "methodology": "<p>Information about this metric could be found in a company's sustainability report or corporate social responsibility report, but it may also be found in other documents the company has published, most notably a <strong>supply chain policy or code of conduct document</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>This metric is about collecting data on how living wage policies are described, it is therefore <strong>important to include quotations from sources that describe the company's living wage policies/practices.</strong></p>\r\n<p>Answer options should be selected as follows:</p>\r\n<p><strong>No Living Wage Policy: </strong>Where the company does not refer a living wage or a similar concept in relation to its communications with suppliers.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Living Wage guidelines:</strong> Where the company includes living wage guidelines in its contractual arrangements with its suppliers or its supplier code of conduct.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Living Wage practices: </strong>Where the company describes how it works with suppliers to improve their living wage practices.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Living Wage progress: </strong>Where the company provides an analysis of trends in progress made.</p>\r\n<p>If no such policy is found, the answer is <strong>No Living Wage Policy</strong> (<strong>not Unknown</strong>).</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Living Wage Policy",
        "Living Wage guidelines",
        "Living Wage practices",
        "Living Wage progress"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG1 - No Poverty",
        "UN SDGs+SDG1.1 Eradicate extreme poverty everywhere.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG1.4 Ensure equal access to resources, services, property, and finance for all."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1459,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 46,
      "companies": 731,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Living_Wage_Policy_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3446450,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Water discharge impact (GRI Standard 306-5)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Water_discharge_impact_GRI_Standard_306_5.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Water discharge impact (GRI Standard 306-5)",
      "question": "Did the company report water bodies or related habitats significantly affected by water discharges and/or runoff?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the environmental dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on living and non-living natural systems, including land, air, water, and ecosystems. <a href=\"/Source_000090313\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 306</a> addresses the topic of effluents and waste. This includes water discharges; the generation, treatment and disposal of waste; and spills of chemicals, oils, fuels, and other substances.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">covers one of the requirements of the indicator under the disclosure </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">306-5 Water bodies affected by water discharges and/or runoff</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">The impacts of water discharges vary depending on the quantity, quality, and destination of the discharge. The unmanaged discharge of effluents with a high chemical or nutrient load (principally nitrogen, phosphorous, or potassium) can affect aquatic habitats, the quality of an available water supply, and an organization’s relationship with communities and other water users.The generation, treatment and disposal of waste – including its improper transportation – can also pose harm to human health and the environment. This is of particular concern if waste is transported to countries lacking the infrastructure and regulations to handle it. Spills of chemicals, oils, and fuels, among other substances, can potentially affect soil, water, air, biodiversity, and human health.</span></p>\r\n<p>These concepts are covered by the Basel and Ramsar Conventions, and in key instruments of the International Maritime Organization.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric asks whether the company reports <strong>water bodies or habitats affected by water discharges and/or runoff</strong>, covered by the GRI Standard Disclosure 306-5: Water bodies affected by water discharges and/or runoff.</p>\r\n<p>Search appropriate sources such as Annual and Sustainability Reports for this information</p>\r\n<p>Keywords &amp; search terms: 306, EN26, Water, Discharge, Habitat, GRI</p>\r\n<p>If the company does report on Water bodies and related habitats affected by water discharges and/or runoff, the answer will be 'Yes'. If the company does not report this, the answer will be 'No'. If no relevant sources were found (such as annual or sustainability reports), select <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">'Unknown'.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Make sure to add the page number where the answer was found, and include any contextual information provided in the report in the 'Comment' field.</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 180,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 9,
      "companies": 77,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Water_discharge_impact_GRI_Standard_306_5+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3446459,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Incidents of Corruption (GRI Standard 205-3-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Incidents_of_Corruption_GRI_Standard_205_3_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Incidents of Corruption (GRI Standard 205-3-a)",
      "question": "What is the number of confirmed incidents of corruption in the organization?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards Guidelines</span> [[https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-download-center/|(see details on indicators here)]].</p>\r\n<p><span>It covers one of the requirements </span><span>(part a.)</span><span> </span><span>of the indicator</span><span> under </span><span><strong>Disclosure 205-3: Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions</strong>. </span><span>The full indicator covers the following:</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>a. Total number and nature of confirmed incidents of corruption. </strong></p>\r\n<p>b. Total number of confirmed incidents in which employees were dismissed or disciplined for corruption. </p>\r\n<p>c. Total number of confirmed incidents when contracts with business partners were terminated or not renewed due to violations related to corruption. </p>\r\n<p>d. Public legal cases regarding corruption brought against the organization or its employees during the reporting period and the outcomes of such cases.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Guidance<span> </span></strong></p>\r\n<p><em>Guidance for Disclosure 205-3<span> </span></em></p>\r\n<p>For stakeholders, there is an interest in both the occurrence of incidents and an organization’s response to the incidents. Public legal cases regarding corruption can include current public investigations, prosecutions, or closed cases.<span> </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric asks what is<span> Total number and nature of confirmed incidents of corruption </span>covered under the GRI Standard Disclosure 205-3: Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions.</p>\r\n<p>Search the report for the GRI Standard code 205-3 or look for mentions of corruption to find where or whether the information is included. If found, add the <strong>'number of confirmed incidents of corruption' to the answer field according to the correct year</strong>, and include information on the 'nature of the confirmed incidents' in the comment field.</p>\r\n<p>Companies may use an earlier [[https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/social/society/anti-corruption/Pages/G4-SO5.aspx|GRI G4-SO-5]] code to report this indicator.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "incidents",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 205 - Anti-corruption",
        "GRI Standards+205-3 Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions taken",
        "GRI Standards+205-3-a Confirmed corruption incidents - total number and nature"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1677,
      "bookmarkers": 6,
      "datasets": 46,
      "companies": 835,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Anti_Corruption_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Incidents_of_Corruption_GRI_Standard_205_3_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3447767,
      "name": "Core+Female workers' pay (as a percentage of male workers' pay)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Female_workers_pay_as_a_percentage_of_male_workers_pay.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Female workers' pay (as a percentage of male workers' pay)",
      "question": "What is the average (mean) pay of female workers, expressed as a percentage of male workers' average pay?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is loosely based on the UK legislation requiring disclosure of gender pay gaps by companies based in the UK: [[https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2017/9780111152010|The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017]].</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>There are many ways to report on gender pay gaps, for example averages can be calculated as a mean or median, and the figures can be based on basic (hourly or annual) pay or (include) bonus pay.</p>\r\n<p>The UK Equality Act requires disclosure on a range of variables, and in relation to those disclosures this metric equates to the <strong>mean hourly wage difference</strong>. Check whether the company disclosed to the UK Equality Act and find their reports here: [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results]]</p>\r\n<p>For companies that are not bound by the UK's equality act, it can be quite rare to find any figures about gender pay gaps at all, and so this metric is designed to be quite flexible. Ideally, the answer would cover all of the companies employees globally, but this information is rarely provided at the scale of global operations. </p>\r\n<p>If only one figure is reported, use that figure and make a comment explaining how it was calculated if that information is provided. In particular, <strong>does it cover employees globally or just in a particular country? </strong>Is it a mean or a median, or do they state this? Does it include bonus pay or is it based on a basic hourly rate? Comments that record these details are important because they help us to figure out how companies are reporting, and therefore how their answers should be interpreted.</p>\r\n<p>Sometimes this data is expressed as a ratio, for example, 0.87 to 1 - this would be recorded as 87%.</p>\r\n<p>Numbers greater than 100% are acceptable, these would indicate that female workers at  the company earn more than male workers on average.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Gender Pay Gap Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5.1 End all forms of discrimination against women and girls everywhere.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5.5 Ensure women’s full participation and equal opportunities for leadership in political, economic, and public life.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8.5 Achieve full and productive employment and equal pay for all, including youth and persons with disabilities."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2085,
      "bookmarkers": 20,
      "datasets": 79,
      "companies": 949,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Sussex_Research_Group+Diversity_Inclusion_Disclosure.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Gender_Career_Growth_Parity_Index.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Female_workers_pay_as_a_percentage_of_male_workers_pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3453141,
      "name": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service+Mean Gender Pay Gap (Hourly Pay)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Mean_Gender_Pay_Gap_Hourly_Pay.json",
      "designer": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service",
      "title": "Mean Gender Pay Gap (Hourly Pay)",
      "question": "What was the difference between the mean hourly rate of pay for female employees and the mean hourly rate of pay for male employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>This metric is </span><span> based on the UK legislation requiring disclosure of gender pay gaps by companies based in the UK: [[https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2017/9780111152010|The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017]].</span><span></span></p>\r\n<p><span>Data for this metric only comes from the </span><span>[[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]], and as such it <strong>only concerns the performance of UK-based companies</strong>. Where this metric is applied to the performance of a multi-national company based outside the UK, the answer relates to the performance of some UK-based subsidiary (see the source for details).</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>A negative number means female employees earned more than male employees.</strong></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The data for this metric is taken from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]].</p>\r\n<p>From the legislation:</p>\r\n<p><span>2.</span>—(1) A relevant employer must publish, for 2017 and each subsequent year, the following information—</p>\r\n<p><span>(a)</span><strong><span>the difference between the mean hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 8);</span></strong></p>\r\n<p><span>(b)</span><span>the difference between the median hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 9);</span></p>\r\n<p><span>(c)</span><span>the difference between the mean bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 10);</span></p>\r\n<p><span>(d)</span><span>the difference between the median bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 11);</span></p>\r\n<p><span>(e)</span><span>the proportions of male and female relevant employees who were paid bonus pay (see regulation 12); and</span></p>\r\n<p><span>(f)</span><span>the proportions of male and female full-pay relevant employees in the lower, lower middle, upper middle and upper quartile pay bands (see regulation 13).</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Gender Pay Gap Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 63341,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 10,
      "companies": 11098,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Mean_Hourly_Pay_Equality_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Mean_Gender_Pay_Gap_Hourly_Pay.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Mean_Gender_Pay_Gap_Hourly_Pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3479243,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+Greenhouse Gas emissions per employee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Greenhouse_Gas_emissions_per_employee.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "Greenhouse Gas emissions per employee",
      "question": "How many tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined, CO2 equivalent) did the company emit per employee?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3432335"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3437227"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3666,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 10,
      "companies": 1310,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Emissions_yearly_change.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Greenhouse_Gas_emissions_per_employee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3479761,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+Greenhouse gas emissions per dollar revenue",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Greenhouse_gas_emissions_per_dollar_revenue.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "Greenhouse gas emissions per dollar revenue",
      "question": "How many tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions (scope 1+2 combined, CO2 equivalent) did the company report per each dollar of revenue?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3432335"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3411227"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2673,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 988,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Yearly_change_in_GHG_emissions_per_dollar_revenue.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Greenhouse_gas_emissions_per_dollar_revenue+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3480077,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+Energy consumption per dollar of revenue",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Energy_consumption_per_dollar_of_revenue.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "Energy consumption per dollar of revenue",
      "question": "How many GigaJoules of energy did the compnay consume per dollar of revenue?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3415560"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3411227"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2296,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 899,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Energy_consumption_per_dollar_of_revenue+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3480351,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+Energy consumption per dollar of profit",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Energy_consumption_per_dollar_of_profit.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "Energy consumption per dollar of profit",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3415560"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3413593"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1553,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 626,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Energy_consumption_per_dollar_of_profit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3481668,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+Energy consumption per employee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Energy_consumption_per_employee.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "Energy consumption per employee",
      "question": "How many gigajoules of energy did the company consume per employee?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "gigajoules",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~3415560",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~3437227",
          "name": "m2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3236,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 10,
      "companies": 1157,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Energy_consumption_per_employee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3482023,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+Worker fatalities (% of workforce)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Worker_fatalities_of_workforce.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "Worker fatalities (% of workforce)",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's workforce died due to work-related incidents?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~815203"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3437227"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3125,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 1336,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Worker_fatalities_of_workforce+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3488048,
      "name": "Core+Company Reporting Guidelines",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Company_Reporting_Guidelines.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Company Reporting Guidelines",
      "question": "Does the company's reporting (CSR, annual reports, etc.) use any of the following reporting frameworks?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Many companies provide <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">information around their environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance </span>according to standardized metrics, designed by organizations like the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Integrated Reporting (IR), among others.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the company's annual or sustainability report, does the company cite the standards or guidelines it follows for reporting? For the report that you are citing, indicate which of these, if any, the company uses to report. <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Choose from the following answer options (as many as apply):</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Yes - GRI</strong>: if the company mentions Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) or uses GRI codes</li>\r\n<li><strong>Yes - IR</strong><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">:</span> if the company mentions Integrated Reporting (IR)</li>\r\n<li><strong>Yes - SASB</strong>: if the company mentions the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)</li>\r\n<li><strong>Yes - Other</strong>: if the company report follows ISO, OECD guidelines, or another standard for reporting. Indicate which standard used in the comment field for your answer</li>\r\n<li><strong> No</strong> - if no standards are mentioned in the company report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Unknown should not be used as an option. If the company has not provided ESG reporting the answer will also be No.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - GRI",
        "Yes - IR",
        "Yes - SASB",
        "Yes - UN Global Compact",
        "Yes - OECD Guidelines - OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises or general or sectoral due diligence guidances",
        "Yes - CDP",
        "Yes - Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1115,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 10,
      "companies": 768,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Company_Reporting_Guidelines+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3493315,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Water discharge quality (GRI Standard 306-1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Water_discharge_quality_GRI_Standard_306_1.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Water discharge quality (GRI Standard 306-1)",
      "question": "How many tonnes of organic material (BOD) was contained in the company's water discharge? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards Guidelines <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-download-center/\" target=\"_blank\">(see details on indicators here)</a>. It covers one of the requirements of the indicator under <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1013/gri-306-effluents-and-waste-2016.pdf\">Disclosure 306-1</a> </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Water discharge by quality and destination</span>. The full indicator covers the following:</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">a. Total volume of planned and unplanned water discharges by:</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px; padding-left: 30px;\">i. destination;</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px; padding-left: 30px;\">ii. <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">quality of the water</span>, including treatment method;</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px; padding-left: 30px;\">iii. whether the water was reused by another organization.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">b. Standards, methodologies, and assumptions used.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The amount and quality of the water discharged by the organization is directly linked to ecological impact and operational costs. By progressively improving the quality of discharged water or reducing volumes, the organization has the potential to reduce its impact on the surrounding environment. Unmanaged discharge of effluents with a high chemical or nutrient load (principally nitrogen, phosphorous, or potassium) can have a significant impact on receiving waters. This, in turn, can affect the quality of the water supply available to the organization and its relationship with communities and other water users.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Water effluents can be discharged to subsurface waters, surface waters, sewers that lead to rivers, oceans, lakes, wetlands, treatment facilities, and ground water. Discharge of collected rainwater and domestic sewage is not regarded as water discharge.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) </span>is a measurement of the amount of dissolved oxygen needed by anaerobic organisms to break down organic material in a water sample at a certain temperature over a certain period of time. This measurement can be used to assess the degree of organic pollution in water discharge and is used as an indicator of water quality. BOD can be reported in tonnes of organic material or in kilograms per tonne of product produced. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">This metric is looking for the amount of organic material in tonnes (may be labelled as \"Biological Oxygen Demand\" or \"Biochemical Oxygen Demand\") contained in the company's water discharge. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Search the report for the GRI Standard code <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">306-1</span> or do a keyword search of 'BOD' or 'oxygen demand' or 'water discharge'. If found, add the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">BOD value in tonnes </span>and include a <a href=\"/Adding_comments\">comment</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">documenting exactly where within the source you found the information (page number) and include details of simple or complex</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><a href=\"/Conversions_Calculations\">calculations or conversions</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">made to determine the metric value.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the BOD value is reported in kilograms per tonne of product produced (kg/t.p.), you will need to convert this value into tonnes. To do so, find the tonnes of product produced in the report (if possible) and multiply the kg/t.p. by this value. Then convert the answer from kilograms into tonnes. Make sure you explain your working in the comments section. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If you cannot find the BOD value in the company's report or cannot convert the value as reported, check the '<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Unknown</span>' box, and add any relevant comments before hitting submit. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Companies may use an earlier <a href=\"https://g4.globalreporting.org/specific-standard-disclosures/environmental/effluents-and-waste/Pages/G4-EN22.aspx\">G4-EN22</a> code to report this indicator.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 187,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 9,
      "companies": 70,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Water_discharge_quality_GRI_Standard_306_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3514253,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Impact on Company Behaviour",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Impact_on_Company_Behaviour.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Impact on Company Behaviour",
      "question": "Does the company’s statement describe a change in their policy that occurred as a direct result of the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 was one of the first legislations of its kind in the world. The result of the introduction of the Act is that all commercial organisations with an annual turnover of over £36 million in the UK must publish a slavery and human trafficking statement. However, the extent to which the introduction of the Act has shaped the modern slavery policies of companies is currently unknown. Knowing whether or not a company has shaped their modern slavery policy in response to the Act, helps us to <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">better </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">understand the normative impact that the Act may have had on company behaviour. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company’s statement identifies <strong>any changes to their policies and due diligence which came about as a direct result of the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015</strong>. Some companies specifically say in their statement that their behaviour has changed as a result of the Act. </p>\r\n<p>Examples of this type of change include:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>Updating the company’s code of conduct and/or supplier code</li>\r\n<li>Developing a new modern slavery policy </li>\r\n<li>Changing their risk assessment strategy</li>\r\n<li>Updating their supplier contracts</li>\r\n<li>Developing (or adapting) their training programme</li>\r\n<li>Developing new key performance indicators</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p>In each case, for the answer value to be ‘yes’ the company must say that a change has occurred as a <strong>direct result of the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>If the company identifies one or more changes which have occurred as a direct result of the Act, enter the answer value ‘<strong>Yes</strong>’. </p>\r\n<p>Where there is no information given about whether the Act has shaped the company’s policy, please enter a ‘<strong>No</strong>’ value.</p>\r\n<p>For each value, please include a comment that copies relevant information from the statement. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2134,
      "bookmarkers": 6,
      "datasets": 44,
      "companies": 1235,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Impact_on_Company_Behaviour+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3525949,
      "name": "Sara Velásquez Posada+Employee Turnover",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sara_Velásquez_Posada+Employee_Turnover.json",
      "designer": "Sara Velásquez Posada",
      "title": "Employee Turnover",
      "question": "What is the percentage of employee turnover?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 229,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 61,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sara_Velásquez_Posada+Employee_Turnover+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3525982,
      "name": "Sara Echeverri Quintero+Energy Consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sara_Echeverri_Quintero+Energy_Consumption.json",
      "designer": "Sara Echeverri Quintero",
      "title": "Energy Consumption",
      "question": "What is the amount of energy (MWh) consumed by employee?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "MWh",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 207,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 53,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sara_Echeverri_Quintero+Energy_Consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3526102,
      "name": "Sara Velásquez Posada+Promotion opportunities (Women)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sara_Velásquez_Posada+Promotion_opportunities_Women.json",
      "designer": "Sara Velásquez Posada",
      "title": "Promotion opportunities (Women)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of promotion opportunities for women?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 193,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 53,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sara_Velásquez_Posada+Promotion_opportunities_Women+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3526117,
      "name": "Sara Velásquez Posada+Promotion opportunities (men)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sara_Velásquez_Posada+Promotion_opportunities_men.json",
      "designer": "Sara Velásquez Posada",
      "title": "Promotion opportunities (men)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of promotion opportunities for men?\r\n \r\n \r\n ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 195,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 54,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sara_Velásquez_Posada+Promotion_opportunities_men+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3528541,
      "name": "Mariana+Waste in Manufacturing",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mariana+Waste_in_Manufacturing.json",
      "designer": "Mariana",
      "title": "Waste in Manufacturing",
      "question": "In what percentage was the waste in manufacturing reduced?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mariana+Waste_in_Manufacturing+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3528587,
      "name": "Mariana+Front-of-pack calorie labelling.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mariana+Front_of_pack_calorie_labelling.json",
      "designer": "Mariana",
      "title": "Front-of-pack calorie labelling.",
      "question": "In what percentage of the portfolio is the \"Front-of-pack calorie\" label?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mariana+Front_of_pack_calorie_labelling+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3528648,
      "name": "Mariana+Packaging reduced",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mariana+Packaging_reduced.json",
      "designer": "Mariana",
      "title": "Packaging reduced",
      "question": "How many pounds of packaging has been eliminated?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mariana+Packaging_reduced+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3528683,
      "name": "Mariana+Invest into communities to promote healthy lifestyles",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mariana+Invest_into_communities_to_promote_healthy_lifestyles.json",
      "designer": "Mariana",
      "title": "Invest into communities to promote healthy lifestyles",
      "question": "How much did the company invested into healthy lifestyle community partnerships?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mariana+Invest_into_communities_to_promote_healthy_lifestyles+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3533606,
      "name": "Mariana+Countries with partnership",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mariana+Countries_with_partnership.json",
      "designer": "Mariana",
      "title": "Countries with partnership",
      "question": "With how many countries does the company has partnership programs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mariana+Countries_with_partnership+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3536207,
      "name": "Luisa Fernanda Serna+Emisiones de CO2 por año",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Luisa_Fernanda_Serna+Emisiones_de_CO2_por_año.json",
      "designer": "Luisa Fernanda Serna",
      "title": "Emisiones de CO2 por año",
      "question": "¿Cual es la cantidad de toneladas de CO2 emitidas por esta empresa en el año?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Luisa_Fernanda_Serna+Emisiones_de_CO2_por_año+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3554695,
      "name": "Laura Velez+Kilos of recycled material",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Kilos_of_recycled_material.json",
      "designer": "Laura Velez",
      "title": "Kilos of recycled material",
      "question": "How many kilos of material were recycled in the year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Kilos_of_recycled_material+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3556017,
      "name": "Laura Velez+Accredited programs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Accredited_programs.json",
      "designer": "Laura Velez",
      "title": "Accredited programs",
      "question": "How many programs does the university have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Accredited_programs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3588791,
      "name": "Laura Velez+Research at the University",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Research_at_the_University.json",
      "designer": "Laura Velez",
      "title": "Research at the University",
      "question": "How many research programs has the univertsity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Research_at_the_University+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3588815,
      "name": "Laura Velez+Foreign students",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Foreign_students.json",
      "designer": "Laura Velez",
      "title": "Foreign students",
      "question": "How many foreign students does the university have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "foreign students",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Foreign_students+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3588881,
      "name": "Laura Velez+Energy Saving",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Energy_Saving.json",
      "designer": "Laura Velez",
      "title": "Energy Saving",
      "question": "How much was the energy saving in kw/h?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kw/h",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Energy_Saving+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3588905,
      "name": "Laura Velez+Water saving",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Water_saving.json",
      "designer": "Laura Velez",
      "title": "Water saving",
      "question": "How much was the water saving in liters?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "liters",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Water_saving+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3588922,
      "name": "Laura Velez+Mineral saving",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Mineral_saving.json",
      "designer": "Laura Velez",
      "title": "Mineral saving",
      "question": "How much was the mineral savings?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "oil/liters",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Mineral_saving+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3588961,
      "name": "Laura Velez+Recovered trees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Recovered_trees.json",
      "designer": "Laura Velez",
      "title": "Recovered trees",
      "question": "how many trees were recovered?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "trees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Recovered_trees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3588976,
      "name": "Laura Velez+CO2 decrease",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+CO2_decrease.json",
      "designer": "Laura Velez",
      "title": "CO2 decrease",
      "question": "how much was the CO2 Decrease (Kg)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kg",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+CO2_decrease+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3588992,
      "name": "Laura Velez+Landfill space",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Landfill_space.json",
      "designer": "Laura Velez",
      "title": "Landfill space",
      "question": "Landfill space (m3) at the year",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Landfill_space+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3589013,
      "name": "Laura Velez+Bauxite consumption decrease",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Bauxite_consumption_decrease.json",
      "designer": "Laura Velez",
      "title": "Bauxite consumption decrease",
      "question": "which was the decrease in bauxite consumption? (Kg)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "kg",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Bauxite_consumption_decrease+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3594541,
      "name": "Laura Velez+Geenmetric",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Geenmetric.json",
      "designer": "Laura Velez",
      "title": "Geenmetric",
      "question": "In what place is Eafit of the classification?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "place",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Geenmetric+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3594567,
      "name": "Laura Velez+Performance indicator",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Performance_indicator.json",
      "designer": "Laura Velez",
      "title": "Performance indicator",
      "question": "How many has increased or decreased the performance indicator?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Percentage (%)",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Performance_indicator+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3596610,
      "name": "Laura Velez+Innovacion Eafit",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Innovacion_Eafit.json",
      "designer": "Laura Velez",
      "title": "Innovacion Eafit",
      "question": "What is the average number of people that this program has benefited?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "people",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Innovacion_Eafit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3603769,
      "name": "Santiago Escobar+patents approved",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Santiago_Escobar+patents_approved.json",
      "designer": "Santiago Escobar",
      "title": "patents approved",
      "question": "How Many Patents Where approved in 2017?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Santiago_Escobar+patents_approved+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3605286,
      "name": "Laura Velez+Scholarships",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Scholarships.json",
      "designer": "Laura Velez",
      "title": "Scholarships",
      "question": "How many beneficiaries in scholarships are there?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "beneficiaries",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Scholarships+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3605310,
      "name": "Laura Velez+Teachers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Teachers.json",
      "designer": "Laura Velez",
      "title": "Teachers",
      "question": "How many teachers are there in the institution?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "teachers",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Teachers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3605334,
      "name": "Laura Velez+Continuing education",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Continuing_education.json",
      "designer": "Laura Velez",
      "title": "Continuing education",
      "question": "How many participants in continuing education?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "participants",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Continuing_education+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3605349,
      "name": "Laura Velez+Innovation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Innovation.json",
      "designer": "Laura Velez",
      "title": "Innovation",
      "question": "How many patents granted in innovation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "patents",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laura_Velez+Innovation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3605435,
      "name": "Danielle Keller Aviram+Minerals_Origin",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Danielle_Keller_Aviram+Minerals_Origin.json",
      "designer": "Danielle Keller Aviram",
      "title": "Minerals_Origin",
      "question": "Does the company specify the regional origin of the mineral materials they source? \r\n \r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">An important element of responsible sourcing is to put in place chain of custody systems to trace gold and diamonds to their mines of origin, and systematically record this information, resulting in traceability of material.</p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Traceability and chain of custody information are not guarantees that international human rights and environmental standards are respected in the mines of origin but are useful tools for jewelers who seek to assess and monitor human rights risks at the mine level.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Source</strong>: Human Rights Watch. 2018.\"The Hidden Cost of Jewelry Human Rights in Supply Chains and the Responsibility of Jewelry Companies, p.41\".</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<div>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Go through the <a href=\"https://www.hrw.org/report/2018/02/08/hidden-cost-jewelry/human-rights-supply-chains-and-responsibility-jewelry\">The Hidden Cost of Jewelry</a> Report to find out whether the company you are researching publishes information on the regional origin of the mineral materials they source.<br><br>If the company is not part of the Report, browse the Corporate Social Responsibility section of the company's Website and see if you can find information on the geographical origin of sourced gold &amp; diamonds. <br><br>Usually, you will find this information on documents titled \"Conflict Minerals” or \"Responsible Sourcing\" or \"Sustainability Report\".</p>\r\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span><span>Enter <strong>Yes </strong>if</span> the list is provided.</span></li>\r\n<li><span><span>Enter <strong>No</strong> </span>if it is not reported.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"> </p>\r\n<h5 style=\"text-align: justify;\"> </h5>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 15,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 15,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Danielle_Keller_Aviram+Minerals_Origin+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3605540,
      "name": "Danielle Keller Aviram+Supplier Code of Conduct",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Danielle_Keller_Aviram+Supplier_Code_of_Conduct.json",
      "designer": "Danielle Keller Aviram",
      "title": "Supplier Code of Conduct",
      "question": "Does the company have a Supplier’s Code of Conduct?\r\n \r\n ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>A Supplier Code of Conduct is a document drafted by a company to make sure all of its suppliers and subcontractors share certain principles of sustainability and other ethical and legal obligations. The document is made available to the company's suppliers with the goal of strengthening mutual understanding of how sustainability and relevant regulations are to be practiced in day-to-day business.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go through the <a href=\"https://www.hrw.org/report/2018/02/08/hidden-cost-jewelry/human-rights-supply-chains-and-responsibility-jewelry\">The Hidden Cost of Jewelry</a> Report to find out whether the company you are researching is publishing a Suppliers Code of Conduct or similar document. If the company you are researching is not part of the report, browse the Corporate Social <span>Responsibility</span>'s section on the company's Website.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Code of Conduct, Suppliers Policy.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>If the company publishes its Supplier’s Code of Conduct, select \"<strong>Yes</strong>\".</li>\r\n<li>If the company does not publish its Supplier’s Code of Conduct, select \"<strong>No</strong>\".</li>\r\n<li>If the company claims to be working on a Supplier’s Code of Conduct, select \"<strong>In Development</strong>\".</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "In development"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 17,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Danielle_Keller_Aviram+Supplier_Code_of_Conduct+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3605637,
      "name": "Danielle Keller Aviram+Suppliers_Certifications",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Danielle_Keller_Aviram+Suppliers_Certifications.json",
      "designer": "Danielle Keller Aviram",
      "title": "Suppliers_Certifications",
      "question": "Which of the following certifications does the company comply with?\r\n ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In addition to the <a href=\"https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/un-guiding-principles\" target=\"_blank\">United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights</a>, other global standards exist for precious metals and stones. Among the main standards <span style=\"font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri Light',sans-serif; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;\"></span>developed to guide companies to adopt responsible sourcing practices are:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>The <a href=\"http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Due Diligence Guidance</a> for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD),</li>\r\n<li>the <a href=\"https://www.kimberleyprocess.com/en/kpcs-core-document\" target=\"_blank\">Kimberley Process Certification Scheme</a></li>\r\n<li>Two standards by the <a href=\"https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/files/FAQs-on-Membership-Member-Responsibilities-20121.pdf\">Responsible Jewellery Council</a> (Member Certification and Chain of Custody Certification).</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Go through the <a href=\"https://www.hrw.org/report/2018/02/08/hidden-cost-jewelry/human-rights-supply-chains-and-responsibility-jewelry\">The Hidden Cost of Jewelry</a> <span>Report to find out whether the company you are researching complies with relevant certifications. If the company you are researching is not part of the report, </span><span>browse the company's Website and see if the company displays any of the following certifications: </span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Select \"<strong>RJC-Chain of Custody Certification (CoC)</strong>\" if you find the company is certified by the Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC).</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Select \"<strong>RJC-Code of Practices Certification (CoP)</strong>\" if you find the company is certified by the Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC).</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Select \"<strong>Fairmined Standard</strong>\" if you find the company has such certification.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Select \"<strong>Fairmined Gold Standard</strong>\" if you find the company has such certification.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Select \"<strong>Kimberly Process Certification Scheme</strong>\" if you find the company hold a KPCS certification.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Select \"<strong>Others</strong>\" if you find the company is certified by standard that is not listed here and cite the complete name in the Comment section.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If you cannot find information about a certification or standard, select \"<strong>Unknown</strong>\".</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "RJC-Chain of Custody Certification (CoC)",
        "RJC-Code of Practices Certification (CoP)",
        "Fairmined Standard",
        "Fairtrade Gold Standard",
        "Kimberly Process Certification Scheme (KPCS)",
        "Others (add details in the comments section)",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 15,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 15,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Danielle_Keller_Aviram+Suppliers_Certifications+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3605689,
      "name": "Lucia Ixtacuy+Artisanal_Small-Scale_Mines",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Artisanal_Small_Scale_Mines.json",
      "designer": "Lucia Ixtacuy",
      "title": "Artisanal_Small-Scale_Mines",
      "question": "Does the company source gold from artisanal and small-scale mines? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "In development"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Artisanal_Small_Scale_Mines+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3605707,
      "name": "Danielle Keller Aviram+Artisanal_Small-Scale_Mines",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Danielle_Keller_Aviram+Artisanal_Small_Scale_Mines.json",
      "designer": "Danielle Keller Aviram",
      "title": "Artisanal_Small-Scale_Mines",
      "question": " How does the company claim to support artisanal and small-scale mines?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>A good practice among the industry is the support for artisanal and small-scale mines as a way to foster higher ethical, social, and environmental standards. The Responsible Artisanal Gold Solutions Forum (RAGSF) and the Diamond Development Initiative are among the main organizations working for the formalization and promotion of responsible artisanal diamond mining.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go through<a href=\"https://www.hrw.org/report/2018/02/08/hidden-cost-jewelry/human-rights-supply-chains-and-responsibility-jewelry\"> The Hidden Cost of Jewelry</a> Report to find out whether the company you are researching publishes information on how it supports artisanal and small-scale mines.</p>\r\n<p>If the company is not part of the Report, browse the Corporate Social Responsibility section of the company's Website and look for the information.</p>\r\n<p>Usually, documents entitled Statement on Gemstone Sourcing, Conflict Minerals or Corporate Social Responsibility Report may contain information about it.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If the company claims to support artisanal/small-scale mines financially, select “<strong>Financial support</strong>”.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If the company claims to sources responsible from artisanal/small-scale mines, select “<strong>Sourcing responsibly</strong>”.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If the company claims to be developing ways to support artisanal/small-scale mines, select “<strong>In development</strong>”.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If the company clearly states that it does not support artisanal/small-scale mines, select “<strong>Does not support artisanal/small-scale mines</strong>”.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If you cannot find information on this regard, select “<strong>Unknown</strong>”.  <span style=\"font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"><br></span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Financial support",
        "Sourcinging Responsible",
        "In development",
        "Does not support artisanal/small-scale mines"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 15,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 15,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Danielle_Keller_Aviram+Artisanal_Small_Scale_Mines+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3605753,
      "name": "Danielle Keller Aviram+Company Audit",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Danielle_Keller_Aviram+Company_Audit.json",
      "designer": "Danielle Keller Aviram",
      "title": "Company Audit",
      "question": "Have the company's own operations been audited or verified by a third party?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The so-called third-party audits are a way in which a company can verify their own conduct and that of their suppliers. It consists of systematic independent examinations carried out by an external auditor. <span style=\"font-size: 11.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri Light',sans-serif; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;\"><br></span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go through<a href=\"https://www.hrw.org/report/2018/02/08/hidden-cost-jewelry/human-rights-supply-chains-and-responsibility-jewelry\"> The Hidden Cost of Jewelry</a> Report to find out whether the company you are researching has been audited by a third party.</p>\r\n<p>If the company is not part of the Report, browse the Corporate Social Responsibility section of the company's Website and look for this information. Usually the following documents may contain information about this: Statement on Gemstone Sourcing, Responsible Jewellery Council Policy, Conflict Minerals, Corporate Social Responsibility.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If you find that the company’s conduct is audited or verified by a third party, select “<strong>Yes</strong>”.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If the company clearly states that it is not audited nor verified by a third party, select “<strong>No</strong>”.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If you cannot find information on this regard, select “<strong>Unknown</strong>”.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 15,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 15,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Danielle_Keller_Aviram+Company_Audit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3605763,
      "name": "Danielle Keller Aviram+Recycled Gold",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Danielle_Keller_Aviram+Recycled_Gold.json",
      "designer": "Danielle Keller Aviram",
      "title": "Recycled Gold",
      "question": "What is the percentage of recycled gold that the company purchases?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Gold mining is very damaging for the environment. It pollutes the air and water with toxic substances (e.g. cyanide and mercury). Recycling gold is an environmentally friendly solution. Currently, some companies are disclosing the percentage of the gold they purchase that is recycled and the percentage that is newly mined. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Go through <a href=\"https://www.hrw.org/report/2018/02/08/hidden-cost-jewelry/human-rights-supply-chains-and-responsibility-jewelry\">The Hidden Cost of Jewelry</a> Report to find out whether the company you are researching publishes information on the percentage of recycled gold that it purchases. If the company is not part of the Report, browse the Corporate Social Responsibility section of the company's Website and look for the information.</p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Usually, documents entitled <em>Statement on Gemstone Sourcing</em>, <em>Conflict Minerals</em> or <em>Corporate Social Responsibility Report</em> may contain information about it.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>If you find about the <strong>percentage</strong> of newly mined gold purchased by the company capture the figure in the Answer box.</li>\r\n<li>If you find no information about it, select \"<strong>Unknown</strong>\".</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Be aware that the question asks for a percentage and you may have to do a <strong>calculation</strong>.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 15,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 15,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Danielle_Keller_Aviram+Recycled_Gold+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3605858,
      "name": "Danielle Keller Aviram+Environmental Risks Response",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Danielle_Keller_Aviram+Environmental_Risks_Response.json",
      "designer": "Danielle Keller Aviram",
      "title": "Environmental Risks Response",
      "question": "Does the company respond to its environmental risks?\r\n ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Businesses highly dependent on access to natural resources (i.e. air, water, soil, minerals) often face a high level of environmental risk. In turn, gold and diamond mining operations may cause serious environmental damage and threaten people’s rights to health, water, food, and a healthy environment through the dumping of mine residues, leakages, and other accidents.</p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Environmental risks are potential negative consequences to a business that result from its impacts on the natural environment. Failure to effectively manage environmental issues in a business can lead to a range of financial, legal and reputational consequences for the company.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>Browse the Corporate Social Responsibility section of the company's Website and look for the information.</span></p>\r\n<p>Usually, documents entitled <em>Statement on Gemstone Sourcing, Conflict Minerals </em>or <em>Corporate Social Responsibility Report may contain information about it.</em></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If the company identifies <strong>targets for improving their negative impact on the environment </strong> (e.g. introducing a waste-minimisation programme or efficient new equipment), select “<strong>Yes</strong>”.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If the company <strong>does not identify</strong> targets for improving their negative impact on the environment, select “<strong>No</strong>”.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 15,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 15,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Danielle_Keller_Aviram+Environmental_Risks_Response+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3605883,
      "name": "Danielle Keller Aviram+Environmental Risk Assessment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Danielle_Keller_Aviram+Environmental_Risk_Assessment.json",
      "designer": "Danielle Keller Aviram",
      "title": "Environmental Risk Assessment",
      "question": "Does the company assess its environmental risks?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Environmental risks are potential negative consequences to a business that result from its impacts on the natural environment. Gold and diamond mining operations may cause serious environmental damage and threaten people’s rights to health, water, food, and a healthy environment through the dumping of mine residues, leakages, and other accidents.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span>Browse the Corporate Social Responsibility section of the company's Website and look for the information.</span></p>\r\n<p>Usually, documents entitled <em>Statement on Gemstone Sourcing, Conflict Minerals </em>or <em>Corporate Social Responsibility Report may contain information about it.</em></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If the company identifies <strong>possible sources of harm</strong> to the environment OR identifies the <strong>precautions taken</strong> to avoid harm  the environment, select “<strong>Yes</strong>”.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If the company <strong>does not identify possible sources of harm</strong> to the environment OR <strong>does not identify precautions taken t</strong>o avoid harm to the environment, select “<strong>No</strong>”.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 15,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 15,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Danielle_Keller_Aviram+Environmental_Risk_Assessment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3605910,
      "name": "Danielle Keller Aviram+Owns Manufacturing Facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Danielle_Keller_Aviram+Owns_Manufacturing_Facilities.json",
      "designer": "Danielle Keller Aviram",
      "title": "Owns Manufacturing Facilities",
      "question": "Does the company owns manufacturing plants or facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Processed gold and polished diamonds are transformed into jewelry in manufacturing plants and artisan workshop. By integrating manufacturing into its own operations, a company can have a better control over working conditions in manufacturing in their supply chain.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go through<a href=\"https://www.hrw.org/report/2018/02/08/hidden-cost-jewelry/human-rights-supply-chains-and-responsibility-jewelry\"> The Hidden Cost of Jewelry</a> Report to find out whether the company you are researching owns manufacturing plants or facilities (i.e. if it integrates manufacturing into its operations).</p>\r\n<p>If the company is not part of the Report, browse the Corporate Social Responsibility section of the company's Website and look for the information.</p>\r\n<p>Usually, documents entitled <em>Statement on Gemstone Sourcing, Conflict Minerals or Corporate Social Responsibility Report,</em> may contain information about it.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If you find that the company owns manufacturing plants or facilities, select “<strong>Yes</strong>”.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If you find that the company has plans to acquire manufacturing plants or facilities, select “<strong>In Development</strong>”.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If the company clearly states that it does not owns manufacturing plants or facilities, select “<strong>No</strong>”.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>If you cannot find information on this regard, select “<strong>Unknown</strong>”.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "In Development"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 15,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Danielle_Keller_Aviram+Owns_Manufacturing_Facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3620310,
      "name": "Amnesty International+CMR Covers Coal+Srivigneshwar R Prasad",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Covers_Coal+Srivigneshwar_R_Prasad.json",
      "designer": "Amnesty International",
      "title": "CMR Covers Coal",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 53,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Amnesty_International+CMR_Covers_Coal+Srivigneshwar_R_Prasad+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3622535,
      "name": "Commons+Has Factory",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Has_Factory.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Has Factory",
      "question": "What factories does this company own?",
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Manufacturing",
        "Processing",
        "Fabric & Yarn"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 130,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 130,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Has_Factory+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3622542,
      "name": "Commons+Factory of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Factory_of.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Factory of",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 218,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 218,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Factory_of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3624408,
      "name": "Core+Market Cap",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Market_Cap.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Market Cap",
      "question": "What was the company's market cap for the year (in US Dollars)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Market capitalization refers to the total dollar market value of a company's outstanding shares. Commonly referred to as \"market cap,\" it is calculated by multiplying a company's shares outstanding by the current market price of one share. The investment community uses this figure to determine a company's size, as opposed to using sales or total asset figures.</p>\r\n<p>Using market capitalization to show the size of a company is important because company size is a basic determinant of various characteristics in which investors are interested, including risk.</p>\r\n<p>source: [[https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/marketcapitalization.asp]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">A company's market cap can be found in stock listings among other sources. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If you are able to find the number of shares for the company you are researching, and what they are selling for, the market cap is easy to calculate: For example, a company with 20 million shares selling at $100 a share would have a market cap of $2 billion.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">Monetary unit for this metric is US Dollars</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. If the value is reported in a currency other than US dollars, be sure to convert the units to USD, and <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">add conversion details</span> in the comments section. The following website provides yearly average conversion rates: </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"https://www.ofx.com/en-gb/forex-news/historical-exchange-rates/yearly-average-rates/\">https://www.ofx.com/en-gb/forex-news/historical-exchange-rates/yearly-average-rates/</a></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Include the date you found this data in the comments section, along with any calculation you did. </span></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3341,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 739,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Economic_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Market_Cap+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3641487,
      "name": "Financial Times+Market Cap",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Financial_Times+Market_Cap.json",
      "designer": "Financial Times",
      "title": "Market Cap",
      "question": "What was the company's market cap for the year (in US Dollars)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<div style=\"box-sizing: border-box; overflow: inherit; white-space: normal;\">\r\n<div style=\"box-sizing: border-box; width: 780.312px; color: #404040; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15.2px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: #ffffff; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;\">\r\n<div style=\"box-sizing: border-box; position: absolute; right: 8px;\"> </div>\r\n</div>\r\n<div>The Financial Times (FT) is a Japanese-owned (since 2015), English-language international daily newspaper headquartered in London, with a special emphasis on business and economic news. FT publishes a section consisting of financial data and news about companies and markets (source <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_Times\">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_Times</a>).</div>\r\n<div> </div>\r\n<div>Market capitalization refers to the total dollar market value of a company's outstanding shares. Commonly referred to as \"market cap,\" it is calculated by multiplying a company's shares outstanding by the current market price of one share. The investment community uses this figure to determine a company's size, as opposed to using sales or total asset figures.</div>\r\n<div> </div>\r\n<div>Using market capitalization to show the size of a company is important because company size is a basic determinant of various characteristics in which investors are interested, including risk (source: <a href=\"https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/marketcapitalization.asp\">https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/marketcapitalization.asp</a>)</div>\r\n</div>\r\n<div style=\"box-sizing: border-box; overflow: inherit; white-space: normal;\">\r\n<div style=\"box-sizing: border-box; overflow: inherit; white-space: normal;\"> </div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric, a company's market cap can be found in the data section of the FT website: <a href=\"https://markets.ft.com/data/equities\">https://markets.ft.com/data/</a></p>\r\n<p>The <strong>Monetary unit for this metric is US Dollars</strong>. If the value is reported in a currency other than US dollars, be sure to convert the unit to USD, and <strong>add conversion</strong> details in the comments section. The following website provides yearly average conversion rates: <a href=\"https://www.ofx.com/en-gb/forex-news/historical-exchange-rates/yearly-average-rates/\">https://www.ofx.com/en-gb/forex-news/historical-exchange-rates/yearly-average-rates/ </a></p>\r\n<p>Include the date you found this data in the comments section, along with any calculation you did.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Financial_Times+Market_Cap+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3641501,
      "name": "Commons+Country of origin",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Country_of_origin.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Country of origin",
      "question": "In which country the company is located?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2610,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 2610,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Country.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Country_of_origin+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3651527,
      "name": "Commons+Subsidiary Of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Subsidiary_Of.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Subsidiary Of",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": "<p>A parent company is a company that has a controlling interest in another company, giving it control of its operations. Parent companies can be either hands-on or hands-off owners of its <a href=\"https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/subsidiary.asp\">subsidiaries</a>, depending on the amount of managerial control given to subsidiary managers, but will always maintain a certain level of active control.</p>\r\n<p>Source: [[https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/parentcompany.asp|Investopedia]]</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16541,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 11872,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Subsidiary_Of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3651534,
      "name": "Commons+Parent of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Parent_of.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Parent of",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3349,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 2313,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Parent_of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3654379,
      "name": "Commons+uses Gold smelted by",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+uses_Gold_smelted_by.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "uses Gold smelted by",
      "question": "Which companies supply Gold to this company?",
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 472,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 237,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Discloses_Smelters_and_Refiners.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+uses_Gold_smelted_by+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3654387,
      "name": "Vasiliki Gkatziaki+is Gold supplier of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+is_Gold_supplier_of.json",
      "designer": "Vasiliki Gkatziaki",
      "title": "is Gold supplier of",
      "question": "Which companies source Gold from this smelter/refiner?",
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3467,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1429,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Industry.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+is_Gold_supplier_of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3753795,
      "name": "Investor Transparency Research Group+Principles for Responsible Investment Signatory",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+Principles_for_Responsible_Investment_Signatory.json",
      "designer": "Investor Transparency Research Group",
      "title": "Principles for Responsible Investment Signatory",
      "question": "Is the company a signatory of the Principles for Responsible Investment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The six Principles for Responsible Investment are a voluntary and aspirational set of investment principles that offer a menu of possible actions for incorporating ESG issues into investment practice.</p>\r\n<p>Principles for Responsible Investment signatories include asset owners, investment managers and service providers.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To find out whether the investment company you are researching is a Principles for Responsible Investment signatory, search the <a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/searchresults?qkeyword=&amp;parametrics=WVSECTION%7cSignatories\">PRI signatory database</a>. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company can be found in the signatory database, enter the '<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes</span>' value and add/cite the company's signatory database page as a source. If the company cannot be found in the signatory database, enter the '<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">No</span>' value and add/cite the signatory database as a source. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Responsible Investment Transparency Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 17,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+Principles_for_Responsible_Investment_Signatory+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3753816,
      "name": "Investor Transparency Research Group+Principles for Responsible Investment Category",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+Principles_for_Responsible_Investment_Category.json",
      "designer": "Investor Transparency Research Group",
      "title": "Principles for Responsible Investment Category",
      "question": "What category of PRI signatory is the company? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The six Principles for Responsible Investment are a voluntary and aspirational set of investment principles that offer a menu of possible actions for incorporating ESG issues into investment practice.</p>\r\n<p>Principles for Responsible Investment signatories are divided into three categories: asset owners, investment managers and service providers.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To find out which PRI category the company you are researching falls under, search the <a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/searchresults?qkeyword=&amp;parametrics=WVSECTION%7cSignatories\">PRI signatory database</a>. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company can be found in the signatory database, <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">enter the PRI category that the company has been assigned </span>and add/cite the company's signatory database page as a source.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company cannot be found in the signatory database, enter '<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">No</span>' and add/cite the signatory database as a source. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">'<strong>Unknown</strong>' is not a possible answer for this metric question. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Asset Owner",
        "Investment Manager",
        "Service Provider"
      ],
      "report_type": "Responsible Investment Transparency Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 17,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 17,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+Principles_for_Responsible_Investment_Category+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3753850,
      "name": "Investor Transparency Research Group+Assets under Management (AUM)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+Assets_under_Management_AUM.json",
      "designer": "Investor Transparency Research Group",
      "title": "Assets under Management (AUM)",
      "question": "What were the company's total assets under management at the end of the reporting year (in USD)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Assets under management refer to the total market value of all the financial assets that a financial services company manages on behalf of itself and its clients. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To find the total assets under management for the company you are researching, look in the company's responsible investment transparency report. The answer for the metric can be found under the indicator <strong>OO 04.4 - </strong><strong>Organisational Overview: </strong><strong style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Reporting year and AUM</strong><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p>Enter the AUM value into the answer box and add/cite the company's transparency report as a source. If the answer cannot be found, enter 'Unknown' as your answer.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">Monetary unit for this metric is US Dollars</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. If the value is reported in a currency other than US dollars, please consult convert to USD, and <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">add conversion details</span> in the comments section. The following page provides yearly average conversion rates: </span><a href=\"/currency_conversions\">https://wikirate.org/currency_conversions</a> </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Responsible investment transparency reports can be found on the Principles for Responsible Investment website </span><a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/signatories/transparency-reports-2018/3350.article\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Further information on the PRI Reporting Framework 2018 for the Organisational Overview module can be found </span><a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/Uploads/l/s/i/1.-OO-2018---final.pdf\">here.</a></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Responsible Investment Transparency Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 186,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 175,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+Assets_under_Management_AUM+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3753881,
      "name": "Investor Transparency Research Group+ESG Incorporation into Investment Decisions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+ESG_Incorporation_into_Investment_Decisions.json",
      "designer": "Investor Transparency Research Group",
      "title": "ESG Incorporation into Investment Decisions",
      "question": "In which asset classes does the company incorporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria into their investment decisions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>ESG incorporation refers to the review and use of ESG information in the investment decision-making process. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To find the answer, look in the company's responsible investment transparency report. The answer for the metric can be found under the indicator </span><strong>OO 11.1</strong><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\"> - Organisational Overview: </span><strong>ESG incorporation practices for all assets</strong><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Under each class of asset, the company will either select '</span>We address ESG incorporation' or 'We do not do ESG incorporation'. Enter the asset classes which the company <strong>does </strong>address ESG incorporation <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">and add/cite the company's transparency report as a source. If the answer cannot be found, enter '<strong>Unknown</strong>' as your answer.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Responsible investment transparency reports can be found on the Principles for Responsible Investment website <a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/signatories/transparency-reports-2018/3350.article\">here</a>. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Further information on the PRI Reporting Framework 2018 for the Organisational Overview module can be found <a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/Uploads/l/s/i/1.-OO-2018---final.pdf\">here.</a></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Listed Equity",
        "Fixed Income - SSA",
        "Fixed income - Corporate (Financial)",
        "Fixed income - Corporate (Non-financial)",
        "Fixed income - Securitised",
        "Private Equity",
        "Property",
        "Infrastructure",
        "Commodities",
        "Hedge Funds",
        "Forestry",
        "Farmland",
        "Inclusive Finance",
        "Cash",
        "Other",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Responsible Investment Transparency Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Responsible_Investor_Disclosures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+ESG_Incorporation_into_Investment_Decisions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3753932,
      "name": "Draft+Corporation Tax Paid",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Corporation_Tax_Paid.json",
      "designer": "Draft",
      "title": "Corporation Tax Paid",
      "question": "How much corporation tax, or tax on profits, did the company pay in this year? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Corporation_Tax_Paid+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3753943,
      "name": "Draft+Tax paid on profits",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Tax_paid_on_profits.json",
      "designer": "Draft",
      "title": "Tax paid on profits",
      "question": "How much corporation tax, or tax on profits, did the company pay?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is intended to take a broad view of tax paid and is flexible with the data that is permissable. In order of preference, the answer should reflect:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>All tax paid on profits worldwide, by all of the company's subsidiaries</li>\r\n<li>Summed taxes paid on profits from as many durisdictions as are available</li>\r\n<li>Tax on profits paid in the jurisdiction where most tax was paid (usually where the company is headquartered)</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Tax_paid_on_profits+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3753951,
      "name": "Draft+Domestic Income Tax Expense/Benefit",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Domestic_Income_Tax_Expense_Benefit.json",
      "designer": "Draft",
      "title": "Domestic Income Tax Expense/Benefit",
      "question": "How much tax did the company pay domestically?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 - m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~2035485"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~2140514"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 22720,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2248,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Domestic_Income_Tax_Expense_Benefit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3754986,
      "name": "Investor Transparency Research Group+AUM Invested in Environmental and Social Themed Areas (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+AUM_Invested_in_Environmental_and_Social_Themed_Areas.json",
      "designer": "Investor Transparency Research Group",
      "title": "AUM Invested in Environmental and Social Themed Areas (%)",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's total assets under management (AUM) does the company invest in environmental and social themed areas? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Environmental and social themed investments are financial investments which help to solve environmental and social challenges as well as bring market-rate returns to the investor.  </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Assets under management refer to the total market value of all the financial assets that a financial services company manages on behalf of itself and its clients. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To find the answer for the company you are researching, look in the company's responsible investment transparency report. The answer for the metric can be found under the indicator </span><strong>SG 15.2</strong><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\"> - Strategy and Governance: </span><strong><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Allocation of assets to environmental and social themed areas</span></strong><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Enter the percentage value into the answer box and add/cite the company's transparency report as a source. This indicator is <strong>voluntary to complete </strong>which means that it may not be disclosed by all PRI signatories. <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the answer cannot be found, enter 'Unknown' as your answer.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Responsible investment transparency reports can be found on the Principles for Responsible Investment website </span><a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/signatories/transparency-reports-2018/3350.article\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Further information on the PRI Reporting Framework 2018 for the Strategy and Governance module can be found <a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/Uploads/e/n/z/2.-SG-2018---final.pdf\">here</a>.</span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Responsible Investment Transparency Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 13,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 13,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Responsible_Investor_Disclosures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+AUM_Invested_in_Environmental_and_Social_Themed_Areas+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3755191,
      "name": "Draft+Percentage water consumption from water stressed areas",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Percentage_water_consumption_from_water_stressed_areas.json",
      "designer": "Draft",
      "title": "Percentage water consumption from water stressed areas",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's water consumption is from areas that are subject to high water stress?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is loosely based on the <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1909/gri-303-water-and-effluents-2018.pdf\">GRI Standards 303 Water and Effluents</a>, which includes the following reporting recommendations:</p>\r\n<div style=\"left: 159.58px; top: 625.56px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.994656);\">b.</div>\r\n<div style=\"left: 187.097px; top: 625.56px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.03983);\">Total water withdrawal from all areas with</div>\r\n<div style=\"left: 507.799px; top: 625.56px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.01941);\">water stress</div>\r\n<div style=\"left: 599.376px; top: 625.56px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.00541);\">in megaliters, and a breakdown of this</div>\r\n<div style=\"left: 187.1px; top: 645.56px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.01045);\">total by the following sources, if applicable:</div>\r\n<div style=\"left: 187.1px; top: 645.56px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.01045);\"> </div>\r\n<p>2.2 The reporting organization should report the following additional information: 2.2.1 A breakdown of total water withdrawal in megaliters by withdrawal source categories listed in Disclosure 303-3, at each facility in areas with water stress; 2.2.2 Total water withdrawal in megaliters by suppliers with significant water-related impacts in areas with water stress.</p>\r\n<p>This metric is for recording the <strong>percentage of the company's water consumption that came from water stressed regions</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>This [[Draft+Water_consumption_from_water_stressed_areas|other metric]] is for recording water use from water stressed areas as a total volume of water consumed. Only one of these is required for a company in a given year, assuming the total water consumption is also available the other one can be calculated.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Percentage_water_consumption_from_water_stressed_areas+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3755201,
      "name": "Draft+Water consumption from water stressed areas",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Water_consumption_from_water_stressed_areas.json",
      "designer": "Draft",
      "title": "Water consumption from water stressed areas",
      "question": "How much water did the company withdraw from water stressed areas?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is loosely based on the <a href=\"https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1909/gri-303-water-and-effluents-2018.pdf\">GRI Standards 303 Water and Effluents</a>, which includes the following reporting recommendations:</p>\r\n<div style=\"left: 159.58px; top: 625.56px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.994656);\">b.</div>\r\n<div style=\"left: 187.097px; top: 625.56px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.03983);\">Total water withdrawal from all areas with</div>\r\n<div style=\"left: 507.799px; top: 625.56px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.01941);\">water stress</div>\r\n<div style=\"left: 599.376px; top: 625.56px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.00541);\">in megaliters, and a breakdown of this</div>\r\n<div style=\"left: 187.1px; top: 645.56px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.01045);\">total by the following sources, if applicable:</div>\r\n<p>2.2 The reporting organization should report the following additional information: 2.2.1 A breakdown of total water withdrawal in megaliters by withdrawal source categories listed in Disclosure 303-3, at each facility in areas with water stress; 2.2.2 Total water withdrawal in megaliters by suppliers with significant water-related impacts in areas with water stress.</p>\r\n<p>This metric is for recording the <strong>volume</strong> of water withdrawn<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> from water stressed regions</span>.</p>\r\n<p>This [[Draft+Percentage_water_consumption_from_water_stressed_areas|other metric]] is for recording water use from water stressed areas as a percentage of total consumption. Only one of these is required for a company in a given year, assuming the total water consumption is also available the other one can be calculated.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "cubic metres",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Water_consumption_from_water_stressed_areas+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3756479,
      "name": "Investor Transparency Research Group+Responsible Investment Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+Responsible_Investment_Policy.json",
      "designer": "Investor Transparency Research Group",
      "title": "Responsible Investment Policy",
      "question": "Does the investment company have a responsible investment policy? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>A responsible investment policy is the commitment from a company to integrate environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) factors into their investment strategy and ownership practices. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To find the answer for the company you are researching, look in the company's responsible investment transparency report. The answer for the metric can be found under the indicator </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">SG 01.1</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\"> - Strategy and Governance: </span><strong>RI policy and coverage</strong>.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company indicates that they have an investment policy that covers their responsible investment approach, enter the '<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes</span>' value and add/cite the company's transparency report as a source.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the answer cannot be found in the company's transparency report, or the company is not a signatory to the PRI, then search on the company's website for a responsible investment policy document. <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company does not have a responsible investment policy, enter the '</span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">No</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">' value and add/cite the company website or transparency report as a source.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Responsible investment transparency reports can be found on the Principles for Responsible Investment website </span><a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/signatories/transparency-reports-2018/3350.article\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Further information on the PRI Reporting Framework 2018 for the Strategy and Governance module can be found <a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/Uploads/e/n/z/2.-SG-2018---final.pdf\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Responsible Investment Transparency Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 7,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Responsible_Investor_Disclosures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+Responsible_Investment_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3756503,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Sustainable Sourcing Procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Sustainable_Sourcing_Procedures.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Sustainable Sourcing Procedures",
      "question": "Does the company have procedures in place for sustainable sourcing?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">These questions are a part of the National Guidelines on Social, Environmental and Economic Responsibilities for Business. They provide the bedrock on which responsible business in Indian companies are laid. Hence to have a yes to any of these questions or a company policy on these aspects strengthens the #ESG aspects of the company.<br><br>This particular metric question is inspired by <strong>NVG Principle 2: Businesses should provide goods and services that are safe and contribute to sustainability throughout their life cycle.</strong><br><br><em>The principle emphasizes that in order to function effectively and profitably, businesses should work to improve the quality of life of people.</em><br><br><em>The principle recognizes that all stages of the product life cycle, right from design to final disposal of the goods and services after use, have an impact on society and the environment. Responsible businesses, therefore, should engineer value in their goods and services by keeping in mind these impacts.</em><br><br><em>The principle, while appreciating that businesses are increasingly aware of the need to be internally efficient and responsible, exhorts them to extend their processes to cover the entire value chain – from sourcing of raw materials or process inputs to distribution and disposal.</em><br><br>Source: [[http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latestnews/National_Voluntary_Guidelines_2011_12jul2011.pdf| Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs]]</span></p>\r\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Sustainable Sourcing </span></strong><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">is when companies integrate environmental and social factors into their practices for selecting suppliers</span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Does the company have <strong>procedures in place for sustainable sourcing</strong>? The answer to this question may be found in the company's <strong>Bu</strong><strong>siness Responsibility Report</strong>. </span></span></p>\r\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Note:</span></span></strong><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"> The <strong>Business Responsibility Report </strong>may be found within the company's <strong>Annual Report</strong> and/or <strong>Sustainability Report</strong>.  </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company reports directly to the NVG principles, the answer can be found under <strong>Principle 2</strong> or <strong>Principle 2.3</strong>. </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company does not report directly to the NVG principles, search in the company's reporting for any procedures related to sustainable sourcing. </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">When looking for the answer in the source, <strong>key words to search for</strong> include:<br></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Principle 2</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Sourcing</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Extraction</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">If the company <strong>does </strong>have one or more procedures in place for sustainable sourcing, select the answer <strong>Yes </strong>and cite the report where you found this information as a source. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">If the company <strong>does not </strong>have any sustainable sourcing procedures, select the answer <strong>No </strong>and cite the relevant report as a source.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Note:</span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"> Sustainable sourcing procedures include </span><em style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">transportation</em><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">.</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">The company may report in fiscal years - in this case,<strong> please use the latest year which is cited. </strong></span></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">A report for 2016/17 should be used for adding data for the year 2017 </span></span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Business Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "National Voluntary Guidelines+Sustainable Sourcing Procedures+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Sustainable_Sourcing_Procedures+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Sustainable_Sourcing_Procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3756512,
      "name": "Investor Transparency Research Group+Responsible Investment Policy (Supply Chain Workers)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+Responsible_Investment_Policy_Supply_Chain_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Investor Transparency Research Group",
      "title": "Responsible Investment Policy (Supply Chain Workers)",
      "question": "Does the company refer to any investment policy or action that relates to improving labor conditions for supply chain workers? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">A responsible investment policy is the commitment from a company to integrate environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) factors into their investment strategy and ownership practices. As part of assessing the ESG risk of an investment, the investor should take into account the social impacts that the investment may have on workforces. Workers in supply chains are known to be at high-risk of exploitation and poor working conditions. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To find the answer for the company you are researching, look in the company's responsible investment transparency report. The company may disclose their responsible investment policies and actions throughout different sections of the report. Search the report for the keywords '<strong>supply chain</strong>', '<strong>labor conditions</strong>' and '<strong>worker rights</strong>'. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company indicates that they have an investment policy and/or action that relates to improving labour conditions for supply chain workers, enter the '<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes</span>' value and add/cite the company's transparency report as a source. Please also include the page number and quote from the source. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the answer cannot be found in the company's transparency report, or the company is not a signatory to the PRI, then search on the company's website for any reference to policies or actions related to labour conditions in supply chains. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If you cannot find any such policy or action, enter the '</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">No</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">' value and add/cite the signatory database as a source.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Responsible investment transparency reports can be found on the Principles for Responsible Investment website </span><a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/signatories/transparency-reports-2018/3350.article\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Further information on the PRI Reporting Framework 2018 for the Strategy and Governance module can be found <a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/Uploads/e/n/z/2.-SG-2018---final.pdf\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Responsible Investment Transparency Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Responsible_Investor_Disclosures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+Responsible_Investment_Policy_Supply_Chain_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3756526,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Local SME Production",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Local_SME_Production.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Local SME Production",
      "question": "Has the company taken any steps to procure goods and services from local and small producers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">These questions are a part of the National Guidelines on Social, Environmental and Economic Responsibilities for Business. They provide the bedrock on which responsible business in Indian companies are laid. Hence to have a yes to any of these questions or a company policy on these aspects strengthens the #ESG aspects of the company.</span><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">This particular metric question is inspired by </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">NVG Principle 2: Businesses should provide goods and services that are safe and contribute to sustainability throughout their life cycle.</span><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><em style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">The principle emphasizes that in order to function effectively and profitably, businesses should work to improve the quality of life of people.</em><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><em style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">The principle recognizes that all stages of the product life cycle, right from design to final disposal of the goods and services after use, have an impact on society and the environment. Responsible businesses, therefore, should engineer value in their goods and services by keeping in mind these impacts.</em><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><em style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">The principle, while appreciating that businesses are increasingly aware of the need to be internally efficient and responsible, exhorts them to extend their processes to cover the entire value chain – from sourcing of raw materials or process inputs to distribution and disposal.</em><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Source: [[http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latestnews/National_Voluntary_Guidelines_2011_12jul2011.pdf| Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs]]</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Has the company taken any steps to <strong>procure goods and services from local and small producers</strong>? The answer to this question may be found in the company's </span></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">Bu</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">siness Responsibility Report</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">. </span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Note:</span></span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"> The <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Business Responsibility Report </span>may be found within the company's <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Annual Report</span> and/or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Sustainability Report</span>.  </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company reports directly to the NVG principles, the answer can be found under <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 2</span> or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 2.4</span>. </span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company does not report directly to the NVG principles, search in the company's reporting for any reference to procurement from local and small producers. </span>When looking for the answer in the source, <strong>key words to search for</strong> include:<br></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Principle 2</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Local</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Community</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">SME</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">If the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">does </span>procure goods and services from local and small producers, select the answer <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes </span>and cite the report where you found this information as a source. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">If the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">does not </span>mention </span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">procuring goods and services from local and small producers</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;\">, select the answer </span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bolder;\">No </span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;\">and cite the relevant report as a source.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Note:</span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"> In particular this includes communities surrounding their place of work.</span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">The company may report in fiscal years - in this case,<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> please use the latest year which is cited. </span></span></span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">A report for 2016/17 should be used for adding data for the year 2017 </span></span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Business Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "National Voluntary Guidelines+Local SME Production+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Local_SME_Production+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Local_SME_Production+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3756537,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Recycling Products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Recycling_Products.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Recycling Products",
      "question": "Does the company have a mechanism to recycle products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">These questions are a part of the National Guidelines on Social, Environmental and Economic </span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Responsibilities</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"> for Business. They provide the bedrock on which responsible business in Indian companies are laid. Hence to have a yes to any of these questions or a company policy on these aspects strengthens the #ESG aspects of the company.</span></p>\r\n<p><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">This particular metric question is inspired by </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">NVG Principle 2: Businesses should provide goods and services that are safe and contribute to sustainability throughout their life cycle.</span><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><em style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">The principle emphasizes that in order to function effectively and profitably, businesses should work to improve the quality of life of people.</em><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><em style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">The principle recognizes that all stages of the product life cycle, right from design to final disposal of the goods and services after use, have an impact on society and the environment. Responsible businesses, therefore, should engineer value in their goods and services by keeping in mind these impacts.</em><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><em style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">The principle, while appreciating that businesses are increasingly aware of the need to be internally efficient and responsible, exhorts them to extend their processes to cover the entire value chain – from sourcing of raw materials or process inputs to distribution and disposal.</em><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Source: [[http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latestnews/National_Voluntary_Guidelines_2011_12jul2011.pdf| Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs]]</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Does the company have <strong>a mechanism to recycle products</strong>? The answer to this question may be found in the company's </span></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">Bu</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">siness Responsibility Report</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">. </span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Note:</span></span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"> The <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Business Responsibility Report </span>may be found within the company's <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Annual Report</span> and/or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Sustainability Report</span>.  </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company reports directly to the NVG principles, the answer can be found under <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 2</span> or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 2.5</span>. </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company does not report directly to the NVG principles, search in the company's reporting to find any reference to a mechanism to recycle products. </span>When looking for the answer in the source, <strong>key words to search for</strong> include:<br></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Principle 2</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Recycle<br></span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Recycling</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Product</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">If the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">does </span>have a mechanism in place to recycle products, select the answer <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes </span>and cite the report where you found this information as a source. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">If the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">does not </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">have a mechanism in place to recycle products</span>, select the answer <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">No </span>and cite the relevant report as a source.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">The company may report in fiscal years - in this case,<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> please use the latest year which is cited. </span></span></span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">A report for 2016/17 should be used for adding data for the year 2017 </span></span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Business Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "National Voluntary Guidelines+Recycling Products+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Recycling_Products+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Recycling_Products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3756546,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Recycling Waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Recycling_Waste.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Recycling Waste",
      "question": "Does the company have a mechanism to recycle waste?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">These questions are a part of the National Guidelines on Social, Environmental and Economic Responsibilities for Business. They provide the bedrock on which responsible business in Indian companies are laid. Hence to have a yes to any of these questions or a company policy on these aspects strengthens the #ESG aspects of the company.</span><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">This particular metric question is inspired by </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">NVG Principle 2: Businesses should provide goods and services that are safe and contribute to sustainability throughout their life cycle.</span><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><em style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">The principle emphasizes that in order to function effectively and profitably, businesses should work to improve the quality of life of people.</em><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><em style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">The principle recognizes that all stages of the product life cycle, right from design to final disposal of the goods and services after use, have an impact on society and the environment. Responsible businesses, therefore, should engineer value in their goods and services by keeping in mind these impacts.</em><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><em style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">The principle, while appreciating that businesses are increasingly aware of the need to be internally efficient and responsible, exhorts them to extend their processes to cover the entire value chain – from sourcing of raw materials or process inputs to distribution and disposal.</em><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><br style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Source: [[http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latestnews/National_Voluntary_Guidelines_2011_12jul2011.pdf| Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs]]</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Does the company have <strong>a mechanism to recycle waste</strong>? The answer to this question may be found in the company's </span></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">Bu</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">siness Responsibility Report</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">. </span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Note:</span></span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"> The <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Business Responsibility Report </span>may be found within the company's <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Annual Report</span> and/or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Sustainability Report</span>.  </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company reports directly to the NVG principles, the answer can be found under <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 2</span> or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 2.5</span>. </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company does not report directly to the NVG principles, search in the company's reporting for any mechanism to recycle waste. </span>When looking for the answer in the source, <strong>key words to search for</strong> include:<br></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Principle 2</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Recycle</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Recycling</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Waste</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">If the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">does </span>have <span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">a mechanism to recycle waste</span>, select the answer <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes </span>and cite the report where you found this information as a source. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">If the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">does not </span>have <span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">a mechanism to recycle waste</span>, select the answer <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">No </span>and cite the relevant report as a source.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">The company may report in fiscal years - in this case,<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> please use the latest year which is cited. </span></span></span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">A report for 2016/17 should be used for adding data for the year 2017 </span></span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Business Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "National Voluntary Guidelines+Recycling Waste+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Recycling_Waste+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Recycling_Waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3756559,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+NVG Principle 6 Policy Applicable Beyond Own Operations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+NVG_Principle_6_Policy_Applicable_Beyond_Own_Operations.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "NVG Principle 6 Policy Applicable Beyond Own Operations",
      "question": "Does the policy related to Principle 6 apply to the broader company network, thus going beyond its own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">These questions are a part of the National Guidelines on Social, Environmental and Economic Responsibilities for Business. They provide the bedrock on which responsible business in Indian companies are laid. Hence to have a yes to any of these questions or a company policy on these aspects strengthens the #ESG aspects of the company.<br><br>This particular metric question is inspired by <strong>NVG Principle 6: Business should respect, protect, and make efforts to restore the environment.</strong><br><br><em>The principle recognizes that environmental responsibility is a prerequisite for sustainable economic growth and for the well being of society.</em><br><br><em>The principle emphasizes that environmental issues are interconnected at the local, regional and global levels which makes it imperative for businesses to address issues such as global warming, biodiversity conservation and climate change in a comprehensive and systematic manner.</em><br><br><em>The principle encourages businesses to understand and be accountable for direct and indirect environmental impacts of their operations, products and services and to strive to make them more environment friendly.</em><br><br></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Source: [[http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latestnews/National_Voluntary_Guidelines_2011_12jul2011.pdf| Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs]]</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Does the <strong>policy related to Principle 6 apply to the broader company network</strong>, thus going beyond its own operations? The answer to this question may be found in the company's </span></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">Bu</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">siness Responsibility Report</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">. </span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Note:</span></span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"> The <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Business Responsibility Report </span>may be found within the company's <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Annual Report</span> and/or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Sustainability Report</span>.  </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company reports directly to the NVG principles, the answer can be found under <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 6</span> or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 6.1</span>. </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company does not report directly to the NVG principles, search in the company's reporting to find if the company has a environmental protection policy which applies their broader company network. </span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><strong>Note:</strong> The broader company network should include entities like the <em>Group / Holding, Joint Ventures, Suppliers, Contractors, NGOs, others</em>.<br><br>When looking for the answer in the source, <strong>key words to search for</strong> include:<br></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Principle 6</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Policy</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Answer:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><strong>Yes</strong>, if one or more of the company's policies apply to one or more of it's business relations.<br></span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><strong>No</strong>, if only the company itself is covered by its policies, or no explicit statement is made that it also applies to others in their network.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">The company may report in fiscal years - in this case,<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> please use the latest year which is cited. </span></span></span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">A report for 2016/17 should be used for adding data for the year 2017 </span></span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Business Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "National Voluntary Guidelines+NVG Principle 6 Policy Applicable Beyond Own Operations+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+NVG_Principle_6_Policy_Applicable_Beyond_Own_Operations+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+NVG_Principle_6_Policy_Applicable_Beyond_Own_Operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3756570,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Addressing Global Environmental Issues",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Addressing_Global_Environmental_Issues.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Addressing Global Environmental Issues",
      "question": "Does the company have strategies or initiatives in place to address global environmental issues such as climate change and global warming?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">These questions are a part of the National Guidelines on Social, Environmental and Economic Responsibilities for Business. They provide the bedrock on which responsible business in Indian companies are laid. Hence to have a yes to any of these questions or a company policy on these aspects strengthens the #ESG aspects of the company.<br><br>This particular metric question is inspired by <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">NVG Principle 6: Business should respect, protect, and make efforts to restore the environment.</span><br><br><em>The principle recognizes that environmental responsibility is a prerequisite for sustainable economic growth and for the well being of society.</em><br><br><em>The principle emphasizes that environmental issues are interconnected at the local, regional and global levels which makes it imperative for businesses to address issues such as global warming, biodiversity conservation and climate change in a comprehensive and systematic manner.</em><br><br><em>The principle encourages businesses to understand and be accountable for direct and indirect environmental impacts of their operations, products and services and to strive to make them more environment friendly.</em><br><br></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Source: [[http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latestnews/National_Voluntary_Guidelines_2011_12jul2011.pdf| Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs]]</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Does the company have strategies or initiatives in place <strong>to address global environmental issues such as climate change and global warming</strong>? The answer to this question may be found in the company's </span></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">Bu</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">siness Responsibility Report</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">. </span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Note:</span></span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"> The <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Business Responsibility Report </span>may be found within the company's <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Annual Report</span> and/or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Sustainability Report</span>.  </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company reports directly to the NVG principles, the answer can be found under <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 6</span> or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 6.2</span>.</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company does not report directly to the NVG principles, search in the company's reporting for any strategies/initiatives related to global environmental issues. </span>When looking for the answer in the source, <strong>key words to search for</strong> include:<br></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Principle 6</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Climate change</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Global warming</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Project</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Strategy</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Initiative</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 13.3333px;\">does </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">have </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">strategies/initiatives related to global environmental issues</span>, </span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">select the answer <strong>Yes </strong>and </span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;\">please add a hyperlink of the webpage that describes the project as a second source and cite both that and the company's report in which you found the answer to the metric question.</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;\"></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">does not </span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">have </span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">strategies/initiatives related to global environmental issues</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">, select the answer </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">No </span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">and cite the relevant report as a source.</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;\"></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">The company may report in fiscal years - in this case,<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> please use the latest year which is cited. </span></span></span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">A report for 2016/17 should be used for adding data for the year 2017 </span></span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Business Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "National Voluntary Guidelines+Addressing Global Environmental Issues+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Addressing_Global_Environmental_Issues+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Addressing_Global_Environmental_Issues+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3756581,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Identifies Environmental Risks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Identifies_Environmental_Risks.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Identifies Environmental Risks",
      "question": "Does the company identify potential environmental risks?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">These questions are a part of the National Guidelines on Social, Environmental and Economic </span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Responsibilities</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;\"> for Business. They provide the bedrock on which responsible business in Indian companies are laid. Hence to have a yes to any of these questions or a company policy on these aspects strengthens the #ESG aspects of the company.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><br>This particular metric question is inspired by <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">NVG Principle 6: Business should respect, protect, and make efforts to restore the environment.</span><br><br><em>The principle recognizes that environmental responsibility is a prerequisite for sustainable economic growth and for the well being of society.</em><br><br><em>The principle emphasizes that environmental issues are interconnected at the local, regional and global levels which makes it imperative for businesses to address issues such as global warming, biodiversity conservation and climate change in a comprehensive and systematic manner.</em><br><br><em>The principle encourages businesses to understand and be accountable for direct and indirect environmental impacts of their operations, products and services and to strive to make them more environment friendly.</em><br><br></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Source: [[http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latestnews/National_Voluntary_Guidelines_2011_12jul2011.pdf| Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs]]</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Does the company <strong>identify potential environmental risks</strong>? The answer to this question may be found in the company's </span></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">Bu</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">siness Responsibility Report</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">. </span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Note:</span></span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"> The <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Business Responsibility Report </span>may be found within the company's <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Annual Report</span> and/or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Sustainability Report</span>.  </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company reports directly to the NVG principles, the answer can be found under <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 6</span> or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 6.3</span>. </span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company does not report directly to the NVG principles, search in the company's reporting for identified environmental risks. </span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">When looking for the answer in the source,</span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bolder;\">key words to search for</span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">include:</span></span></span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Principle 6</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Risk</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Identify</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Identification</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><strong>Note:</strong> A general risk identification mechanism is<strong> not</strong> sufficient to reward a \"Yes\", the company should <em>explicitly</em> state that it identifies <em>environmental</em> risks. </span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">If the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">does </span>identify potential environmental risks, select the answer <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes </span>and cite the report where you found this information as a source. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 13.3333px;\">If details are provided</span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"> about the environmental risk identification strategies or mechanisms, add these to the comments.</span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">If the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">does not </span>identify potential environmental risks, select the answer <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">No </span>and cite the relevant report as a source.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">The company may report in fiscal years - in this case,<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> please use the latest year which is cited. </span></span></span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">A report for 2016/17 should be used for adding data for the year 2017</span></span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Business Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "National Voluntary Guidelines+Identifies Environmental Risks+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Identifies_Environmental_Risks+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Identifies_Environmental_Risks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3756594,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Assesses Environmental Risks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Assesses_Environmental_Risks.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Assesses Environmental Risks",
      "question": "Does the company assess potential environmental risks?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">These questions are a part of the National Guidelines on Social, Environmental and Economic </span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Responsibilities</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;\"> for Business. They provide the bedrock on which responsible business in Indian companies are laid. Hence to have a yes to any of these questions or a company policy on these aspects strengthens the #ESG aspects of the company.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><br>This particular metric question is inspired by <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">NVG Principle 6: Business should respect, protect, and make efforts to restore the environment.</span><br><br><em>The principle recognizes that environmental responsibility is a prerequisite for sustainable economic growth and for the well being of society.</em><br><br><em>The principle emphasizes that environmental issues are interconnected at the local, regional and global levels which makes it imperative for businesses to address issues such as global warming, biodiversity conservation and climate change in a comprehensive and systematic manner.</em><br><br><em>The principle encourages businesses to understand and be accountable for direct and indirect environmental impacts of their operations, products and services and to strive to make them more environment friendly.</em><br><br></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Source: [[http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latestnews/National_Voluntary_Guidelines_2011_12jul2011.pdf| Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs]]</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Does the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">assess potential environmental risks</span>? The answer to this question may be found in the company's </span></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">Bu</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">siness Responsibility Report</span><span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">. </span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Note:</span></span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"> The <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Business Responsibility Report </span>may be found within the company's <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Annual Report</span> and/or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Sustainability Report</span>.  </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company reports directly to the NVG principles, the answer can be found under <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 6</span> or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 6.3</span>. </span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company does not report directly to the NVG principles, search in the company's reporting for environmental risk assessment. </span>When looking for the answer in the source, <strong>key words to search for</strong> include:<br></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Principle 6</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Risk </span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Assessment</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Note:</span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"> A general risk assessment is <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">not</span> sufficient to reward a \"Yes\", the company should <em>explicitly</em> state that it does <em>environmental</em> risk assessments. </span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">does </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">assess potential environmental risks, select the answer </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">and cite the report where you found this information as a source. </span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><strong>If details are provided</strong> about the environmental risk assessment strategies or mechanisms, add these to the comment box of the metric answer.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">does not </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">assess potential environmental risks, select the answer </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">No </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">and cite the relevant report as a source.</span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">The company may report in fiscal years - in this case,<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> please use the latest year which is cited. </span></span></span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">A report for 2016/17 should be used for adding data for the year 2017</span></span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Business Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "National Voluntary Guidelines+Assesses Environmental Risks+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Assesses_Environmental_Risks+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Assesses_Environmental_Risks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3756605,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Clean Development Mechanism Project(s)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Clean_Development_Mechanism_Project_s.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Clean Development Mechanism Project(s)",
      "question": "Does the company have any project related to the Clean Development Mechanism?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">These questions are a part of the National Guidelines on Social, Environmental and Economic Responsibilities for Business. They provide the bedrock on which responsible business in Indian companies are laid. Hence to have a yes to any of these questions or a company policy on these aspects strengthens the #ESG aspects of the company.<br><br>This particular metric question is inspired by <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">NVG Principle 6: Business should respect, protect, and make efforts to restore the environment.</span><br><br><em>The principle recognizes that environmental responsibility is a prerequisite for sustainable economic growth and for the well being of society.</em><br><br><em>The principle emphasizes that environmental issues are interconnected at the local, regional and global levels which makes it imperative for businesses to address issues such as global warming, biodiversity conservation and climate change in a comprehensive and systematic manner.</em><br><br><em>The principle encourages businesses to understand and be accountable for direct and indirect environmental impacts of their operations, products and services and to strive to make them more environment friendly.</em><br><br></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Source: [[http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latestnews/National_Voluntary_Guidelines_2011_12jul2011.pdf| Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs]]</span></p>\r\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Clean Development Mechanism:</span></strong><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"> The Clean Development Mechanism was defined in the Kyoto Protocol. It allows emission-reduction projects in developing countries to earn Certified Emission Reduction (CER) credits. These CERs can be traded and sold in emissions trading schemes.</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Source: </span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">[[https://cdm.unfccc.int/about/index.html| United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change]]</span></span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Does the company have <strong>any project related to the Clean Development Mechanism</strong>? The answer to this question may be found in the company's </span></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">Bu</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">siness Responsibility Report</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">. </span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Note:</span></span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"> The <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Business Responsibility Report </span>may be found within the company's <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Annual Report</span> and/or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Sustainability Report</span>.  </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company reports directly to the NVG principles, the answer can be found under <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 6</span> or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 6.4</span>. </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company does not report directly to the NVG principles, search in the company's reporting for references to Clean Development Mechanism projects. </span>When looking for the answer in the source, <strong>key words to search for</strong> include:<br></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Principle 6</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Clean Development Mechanism (or CDM)</span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"></span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Certified Emission Reduction (or CER)</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 13.3333px;\">does </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">have a project related to the Clean Development Mechanism, select the answer </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Yes </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">and cite the report where you found this information as a source. Please also </span><strong>provide details</strong> about the Clean Development Mechanism project (about 50 words or so) in the comment box of the metric answer.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 13.3333px;\">does not </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">have </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">a project related to the Clean Development Mechanism</span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">, select the answer </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 13.3333px;\">No </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">and cite the relevant report as a source.</span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">The company may report in fiscal years - in this case,<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> please use the latest year which is cited. </span></span></span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">A report for 2016/17 should be used for adding data for the year 2017 </span></span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Business Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "National Voluntary Guidelines+Clean Development Mechanism Project(s)+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Clean_Development_Mechanism_Project_s+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Clean_Development_Mechanism_Project_s+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3756616,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Additional Environmental Initiatives",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Additional_Environmental_Initiatives.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Additional Environmental Initiatives",
      "question": "Has the company undertaken any other initiatives on, for instance, clean technology, energy efficiency, renewable energy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">These questions are a part of the National Guidelines on Social, Environmental and Economic Responsibilities for Business. They provide the bedrock on which responsible business in Indian companies are laid. Hence to have a yes to any of these questions or a company policy on these aspects strengthens the #ESG aspects of the company.<br><br>This particular metric question is inspired by <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">NVG Principle 6: Business should respect, protect, and make efforts to restore the environment.</span><br><br><em>The principle recognizes that environmental responsibility is a prerequisite for sustainable economic growth and for the well being of society.</em><br><br><em>The principle emphasizes that environmental issues are interconnected at the local, regional and global levels which makes it imperative for businesses to address issues such as global warming, biodiversity conservation and climate change in a comprehensive and systematic manner.</em><br><br><em>The principle encourages businesses to understand and be accountable for direct and indirect environmental impacts of their operations, products and services and to strive to make them more environment friendly.</em><br><br></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Source: [[http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latestnews/National_Voluntary_Guidelines_2011_12jul2011.pdf| Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs]]</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\"></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Has the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">undertaken any other initiatives on, for instance, clean technology, energy efficiency, renewable energy</span>? The answer to this question may be found in the company's </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">Bu</span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">siness Responsibility Report</span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<div>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Note:</span></span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"> The <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Business Responsibility Report </span>may be found within the company's <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Annual Report</span> and/or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Sustainability Report</span>.  </span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company reports directly to the NVG principles, the answer can be found under <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 6</span> or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 6.5</span>. </span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company does not report directly to the NVG principles, search in the company's reporting for references to environmental initiatives. </span>When looking for the answer in the source, <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">key words to search for</span> include:<br></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Principle 6</span></span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Clean</span></span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Efficiency</span></span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Efficient</span></span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Renewable</span></span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 13.3333px;\">does </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">have additional environmental initiatives, select the answer </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Yes </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">and cite the report where you found this information as a source. Please also </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">provide details</span> about the additional environmental initiatives (about 50 words or so) in the comment box of the metric answer.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 13.3333px;\">does not </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">have </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">additional environmental initiatives</span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">, select the answer </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 13.3333px;\">No </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">and cite the relevant report as a source.</span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">The company may report in fiscal years - in this case,<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> please use the latest year which is cited. </span></span></span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">A report for 2016/17 should be used for adding data for the year 2017 </span></span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</div>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial; color: #000000;\"> </span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Business Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "National Voluntary Guidelines+Additional Environmental Initiatives+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Additional_Environmental_Initiatives+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Additional_Environmental_Initiatives+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3756627,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+CPCB / SPCB Limits Disclosure (Emissions)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+CPCB_SPCB_Limits_Disclosure_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "CPCB / SPCB Limits Disclosure (Emissions)",
      "question": "Does the company report on their emissions generated in relation to the limits set by the CPCB/SPCB for the financial year being reported?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">These questions are a part of the National Guidelines on Social, Environmental and Economic Responsibilities for Business. They provide the bedrock on which responsible business in Indian companies are laid. Hence to have a yes to any of these questions or a company policy on these aspects strengthens the #ESG aspects of the company.<br><br>This particular metric question is inspired by <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">NVG Principle 6: Business should respect, protect, and make efforts to restore the environment.</span><br><br><em>The principle recognizes that environmental responsibility is a prerequisite for sustainable economic growth and for the well being of society.</em><br><br><em>The principle emphasizes that environmental issues are interconnected at the local, regional and global levels which makes it imperative for businesses to address issues such as global warming, biodiversity conservation and climate change in a comprehensive and systematic manner.</em><br><br><em>The principle encourages businesses to understand and be accountable for direct and indirect environmental impacts of their operations, products and services and to strive to make them more environment friendly.</em><br><br></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Source: [[http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latestnews/National_Voluntary_Guidelines_2011_12jul2011.pdf| Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs]]</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">The <strong>Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) </strong>is a statutory organisation that reports to the Indian Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. The CPCB is responsible for implementing programmes to reduce and control environmental pollution. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">A <strong>State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) </strong>is a state-specific counterpart to the CPCB. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Source: [[http://cpcb.nic.in/Introduction/| Central Pollution Control Board]]</span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Does the company </span></span></span></span></span></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><strong>report on their emissions generated in relation to the limits set by the CPCB/SPCB</strong>? The answer to this question may be found in the company's </span></span></span></span></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">Bu</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">siness Responsibility Report</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">. </span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Note:</span></span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"> The <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Business Responsibility Report </span>may be found within the company's <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Annual Report</span> and/or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Sustainability Report</span>.  </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company reports directly to the NVG principles, the answer can be found under <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 6</span> or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 6.6</span>. </span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company does not report directly to the NVG principles, search in the company's reporting for mention of CPCB/SPCB limits. </span>When looking for the answer in the source,<strong> key words to search for</strong> include:<br></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Principle 6</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Emission</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">CPCB</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">SPCB</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Limit</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">If the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">does </span>report on CPCB/SPCB limits, select the answer <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes </span>and cite the report where you found this information as a source. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">If the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">does not </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">report on CPCB/SPCB limits</span>, select the answer <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">No </span>and cite the relevant report as a source.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">The company may report in fiscal years - in this case,<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> please use the latest year which is cited. </span></span></span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">A report for 2016/17 should be used for adding data for the year 2017</span></span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Business Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "National Voluntary Guidelines+CPCB / SPCB Limits Disclosure (Emissions)+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+CPCB_SPCB_Limits_Disclosure_Emissions+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+CPCB_SPCB_Limits_Disclosure_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3756636,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+CPCB / SPCB Limits Disclosure (Waste)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+CPCB_SPCB_Limits_Disclosure_Waste.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "CPCB / SPCB Limits Disclosure (Waste)",
      "question": "Does the company report on their waste generated in relation to the limits set by the CPCB/SPCB for the financial year being reported? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">These questions are a part of the National Guidelines on Social, Environmental and Economic Responsibilities for Business. They provide the bedrock on which responsible business in Indian companies are laid. Hence to have a yes to any of these questions or a company policy on these aspects strengthens the #ESG aspects of the company.<br><br>This particular metric question is inspired by <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">NVG Principle 6: Business should respect, protect, and make efforts to restore the environment.</span><br><br><em>The principle recognizes that environmental responsibility is a prerequisite for sustainable economic growth and for the well being of society.</em><br><br><em>The principle emphasizes that environmental issues are interconnected at the local, regional and global levels which makes it imperative for businesses to address issues such as global warming, biodiversity conservation and climate change in a comprehensive and systematic manner.</em><br><br><em>The principle encourages businesses to understand and be accountable for direct and indirect environmental impacts of their operations, products and services and to strive to make them more environment friendly.</em><br><br></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Source: [[http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latestnews/National_Voluntary_Guidelines_2011_12jul2011.pdf| Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs]]</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">The <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) </span>is a statutory organisation that reports to the Indian Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. The CPCB is responsible for implementing programmes to reduce and control environmental pollution. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">A <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) </span>is a state-specific counterpart to the CPCB. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Source: [[http://cpcb.nic.in/Introduction/| Central Pollution Control Board]]</span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Does the company </span></span></span></span></span></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><strong>report on their waste generated in relation to the limits set by the CPCB/SPCB</strong>? The answer to this question may be found in the company's </span></span></span></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">Bu</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\">siness Responsibility Report</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">. </span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Note:</span></span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"> The <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Business Responsibility Report </span>may be found within the company's <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Annual Report</span> and/or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Sustainability Report</span>.  </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"></span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company reports directly to the NVG principles, the answer can be found under <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 6</span> or <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Principle 6.6</span>. </span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">If the company does not report directly to the NVG principles, search in the company's reporting for mention of CPCB/SPCB limits. </span>When looking for the answer in the source, <strong>key words to search for</strong> include:<br></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Principle 6</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Waste</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">CPCB</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">SPCB</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Limit</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">If the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">does </span>report on CPCB/SPCB limits, select the answer <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes </span>and cite the report where you found this information as a source. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">If the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">does not </span><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">report on CPCB/SPCB limits</span>, select the answer <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">No </span>and cite the relevant report as a source.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">The company may report in fiscal years - in this case,<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> please use the latest year which is cited. </span></span></span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">A report for 2016/17 should be used for adding data for the year 2017</span></span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Business Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "National Voluntary Guidelines+CPCB / SPCB Limits Disclosure (Waste)+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+CPCB_SPCB_Limits_Disclosure_Waste+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+CPCB_SPCB_Limits_Disclosure_Waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3756667,
      "name": "Investor Transparency Research Group+Responsible Investment Objectives (Labor Issues in Garment Sector)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+Responsible_Investment_Objectives_Labor_Issues_in_Garment_Sector.json",
      "designer": "Investor Transparency Research Group",
      "title": "Responsible Investment Objectives (Labor Issues in Garment Sector)",
      "question": "Does the investment company cover labor issues specific to the garment sector in their responsible investment objectives?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Responsible investment is an investment approach that considers both financial returns and environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) factors in decision-making.</span></p>\r\n<p>Responsible investment objectives are decided upon by companies and include objectives related to responsible investment processes, financial performance of investments, ESG characteristics of investments and capacity and resources. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To find the answer for the company you are researching, look in the company's responsible investment transparency report. The answer for the metric can be found under the indicator </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">SG 06.1</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\"> - Strategy and Governance: </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">RI policy and coverage</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p>Read through the company's responsible investment objectives and look for specific references to labor issues in the garment industry. Enter the labor standards issues that the company includes in their objectives or select '<strong>No</strong>' if the company does not include any. <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This indicator is </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">voluntary to disclose </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">which means that it may not be disclosed by all PRI signatories. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the answer cannot be found, enter '<strong>Unknown</strong>' as your answer.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Responsible investment transparency reports can be found on the Principles for Responsible Investment website </span><a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/signatories/transparency-reports-2018/3350.article\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Further information on the PRI Reporting Framework 2018 for the Strategy and Governance module can be found <a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/Uploads/e/n/z/2.-SG-2018---final.pdf\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Labor standards",
        "Living wage",
        "Modern slavery",
        "Child labor",
        "Protection of migrant workers",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Responsible Investment Transparency Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Responsible_Investor_Disclosures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+Responsible_Investment_Objectives_Labor_Issues_in_Garment_Sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3756707,
      "name": "Investor Transparency Research Group+ESG Incident Process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+ESG_Incident_Process.json",
      "designer": "Investor Transparency Research Group",
      "title": "ESG Incident Process",
      "question": "Does the investment company have a process for identifying and managing ESG incidents that occur within their portfolio? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Responsible investment is an investment approach that considers both financial returns and environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) factors in decision-making. An ESG incident is an incident in which corporate activity has caused a negative social and/or environmental impact. Some examples ESG incidents include environmental law violations, bribery scandals, modern slavery incidents etc. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To find the answer for the company you are researching, look in the company's responsible investment transparency report. The answer for the metric can be found under the indicator </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">SG 04.1</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\"> - Strategy and Governance: </span><strong>Identifying incidents occurring within portfolios</strong><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company indicates that they have a process for identifying and managing ESG incidents, enter the '<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes</span>' value and add/cite the company's transparency report as a source.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the answer cannot be found in the company's transparency report, or the company is not a signatory to the PRI, then search on the company's website for a responsible investment policy document. <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company does not mention that they have an ESG incident process in their policy document, enter the '</span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">No</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">' value and add/cite the company website or transparency report as a source.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Responsible investment transparency reports can be found on the Principles for Responsible Investment website </span><a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/signatories/transparency-reports-2018/3350.article\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Further information on the PRI Reporting Framework 2018 for the Strategy and Governance module can be found <a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/Uploads/e/n/z/2.-SG-2018---final.pdf\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Responsible Investment Transparency Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Responsible_Investor_Disclosures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+ESG_Incident_Process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3756757,
      "name": "Investor Transparency Research Group+Responsible Investment ESG Training",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+Responsible_Investment_ESG_Training.json",
      "designer": "Investor Transparency Research Group",
      "title": "Responsible Investment ESG Training",
      "question": "Does the investment company provide ESG training to their employees? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Responsible investment is an investment approach that considers both financial returns and environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) factors in decision-making.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Part of capacity building for responsible investment is for investment companies to provide their staff with training on how to take into account ESG factors when making investment decisions. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To find the answer for the company you are researching, look in the company's responsible investment transparency report. The company may report on ESG training in several sections of the report. Search the report for the keywords '<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">ESG training</span>' and '<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">training</span>'. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The company may report the answer under the indicators </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">SG 08</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\"> - Strategy and Governance: </span><strong style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">RI in performance management, reward and/or personal development </strong>and <strong>SG 06.1 - Strategy and Governance: RI policy and coverage</strong>.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company indicates that they provide some form of ESG training to their employees, enter the '<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes</span>' value and add/cite the company's transparency report as a source. Please also include the page number and quote from the source. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the answer cannot be found in the company's transparency report, or the company is not a signatory to the PRI, then search on the company's website for any reference to ESG training for investment staff. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If you cannot find any such reference, enter the '</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">No</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">' value and add/cite the company website.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Responsible investment transparency reports can be found on the Principles for Responsible Investment website </span><a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/signatories/transparency-reports-2018/3350.article\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Further information on the PRI Reporting Framework 2018 for the Strategy and Governance module can be found <a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/Uploads/e/n/z/2.-SG-2018---final.pdf\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Responsible Investment Transparency Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Responsible_Investor_Disclosures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Investor_Transparency_Research_Group+Responsible_Investment_ESG_Training+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3757235,
      "name": "Richard Mills+Responsible Investor Disclosures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Responsible_Investor_Disclosures.json",
      "designer": "Richard Mills",
      "title": "Responsible Investor Disclosures",
      "question": "How many of a set of optional Principles of Responsible Investment disclosures metrics did the company make public?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7]);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3753881",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3754986",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~3756479",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~3756512",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~3756667",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~3756757",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~3756707",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 13,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Responsible_Investor_Disclosures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3763177,
      "name": "ShareAction+Signatory Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Signatory_Workforce_Disclosure_Initiative_WDI.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Signatory Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI)",
      "question": "Is the company a signatory of the Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>There are too many poor quality and precarious jobs around the world. The United Nations recognised this in the 2015 Sustainable Development Goals. <a href=\"http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/economic-growth/\" target=\"_blank\">Goal 8</a> calls for ‘decent work for all’. Multinational companies have a key role to play in meeting this goal. Through their operations and supply chains, they are responsible for the pay and wellbeing of millions of workers.</p>\r\n<div>\r\n<p>Importantly, it’s been shown that both companies and workers can benefit from creating better quality jobs.</p>\r\n<p>As shareholders of these companies, institutional investors are well placed to make a difference. The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) mobilises these investors to push for better jobs. The first step is to make sure companies disclose comparable workforce information. Investors can then use this data to engage with companies and drive a race to the top.</p>\r\n<p>The WDI brings investors together to request comparable data from companies via an annual survey. Its ultimate goal is to improve the quality of jobs in multinational companies’ operations and supply chains.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://shareaction.org/wdi/\">ShareAction, Workforce Disclosure Initiative </a></p>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 608,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 9,
      "companies": 601,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Signatory_Workforce_Disclosure_Initiative_WDI.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_shareholders_WDI_signatory.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Signatory_Workforce_Disclosure_Initiative_WDI+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3763188,
      "name": "ShareAction+Invited to Disclose Workforce Data",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Invited_to_Disclose_Workforce_Data.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Invited to Disclose Workforce Data",
      "question": "Was the company invited to disclose workforce data in response to the Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) survey?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"color: #565656; font-family: Roboto, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;\">There are too many poor quality and precarious jobs around the world. The United Nations recognised this in the 2015 Sustainable Development Goals. </span><a href=\"http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/economic-growth/\" target=\"_blank\">Goal 8</a><span style=\"color: #565656; font-family: Roboto, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;\"> </span><span style=\"color: #565656; font-family: Roboto, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;\">calls for ‘decent work for all’. Multinational companies have a key role to play in meeting this goal. Through their operations and supply chains, they are responsible for the pay and wellbeing of millions of workers.</span></p>\r\n<div style=\"float: left; width: 780px; color: #565656; font-family: Roboto, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;\">\r\n<p style=\"margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 11.5px; margin-left: 0px; color: #565656;\">Importantly, it’s been shown that both companies and workers can benefit from creating better quality jobs.</p>\r\n<p style=\"margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 11.5px; margin-left: 0px; color: #565656;\">As shareholders of these companies, institutional investors are well placed to make a difference. The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) mobilises these investors to push for better jobs. The first step is to make sure companies disclose comparable workforce information. Investors can then use this data to engage with companies and drive a race to the top.</p>\r\n<p style=\"margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 11.5px; margin-left: 0px; color: #565656;\">The WDI brings investors together to request comparable data from companies via an annual survey. Its ultimate goal is to improve the quality of jobs in multinational companies’ operations and supply chains.</p>\r\n<p style=\"margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 11.5px; margin-left: 0px; color: #565656;\">Source: <a href=\"https://shareaction.org/wdi/\">ShareAction, Workforce Disclosure Initiative </a></p>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Invited_to_Disclose_Workforce_Data+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3763843,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+Disclosure rate on selected social and environmental metrics",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "Disclosure rate on selected social and environmental metrics",
      "question": "Of this set of metrics, how many did the company disclose the answer for (i.e. not Unknown)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, m8, m9, m10, m11, m12, m13, m14, m15, m16, m17, m18, m19, m20, m21, m22]);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~1821705",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3447767",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~3341320",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~3446459",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~3446450",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~814954",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~836651",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m8",
          "metric": "~826629",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m9",
          "metric": "~1522301",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m10",
          "metric": "~813500",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m11",
          "metric": "~836964",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m12",
          "metric": "~836952",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m13",
          "metric": "~846580",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m14",
          "metric": "~801164",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m15",
          "metric": "~837241",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m16",
          "metric": "~815203",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m17",
          "metric": "~3446430",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m18",
          "metric": "~3446414",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m19",
          "metric": "~826615",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m20",
          "metric": "~801317",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m21",
          "metric": "~836097",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m22",
          "metric": "~1830298",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 8414,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 2464,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Yearly_change_in_disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3764380,
      "name": "Richard Mills+Water use per dollar of revenue",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Water_use_per_dollar_of_revenue.json",
      "designer": "Richard Mills",
      "title": "Water use per dollar of revenue",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~801164"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3411227"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1533,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 715,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Water_use_per_dollar_of_revenue+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3764831,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+Yearly change in GHG emissions per dollar revenue",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Yearly_change_in_GHG_emissions_per_dollar_revenue.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "Yearly change in GHG emissions per dollar revenue",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  (m1 - m2) / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3479761"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3479761",
          "year": "-1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1424,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 489,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Yearly_change_in_GHG_emissions_per_dollar_revenue+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3765022,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+Environmental Protection (as % of revenue)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Environmental_Protection_as_of_revenue.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "Environmental Protection (as % of revenue)",
      "question": "Environmental protection expenditure as a percentage of total revenue",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~1522301"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3411227"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1396,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 623,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Yearly_change_in_environmental_protection_expenditure_as_of_revenue.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Environmental_Protection_as_of_revenue+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3765329,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+Yearly change in environmental protection expenditure as % of revenue",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Yearly_change_in_environmental_protection_expenditure_as_of_revenue.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "Yearly change in environmental protection expenditure as % of revenue",
      "question": "Did the percentage of a company's revenue spent on environmental protection measures increase or decrease from the previous year?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  (m1 - m2) / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3765022"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3765022",
          "year": "-1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 677,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 301,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Yearly_change_in_environmental_protection_expenditure_as_of_revenue+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3765760,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Emission Reported",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Emission_Reported.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Emission Reported",
      "question": "Does the company report the amount of emissions generated?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">These questions are a part of the National Guidelines on Social, Environmental and Economic Responsibilities for Business. They provide the bedrock on which responsible business in Indian companies are laid. Hence to have a yes to any of these questions or a company policy on these aspects strengthens the #ESG aspects of the company.<br><br>This particular metric question is inspired by <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">NVG Principle 6: Business should respect, protect, and make efforts to restore the environment.</span><br><br><em>The principle recognizes that environmental responsibility is a prerequisite for sustainable economic growth and for the well being of society.</em><br><br><em>The principle emphasizes that environmental issues are interconnected at the local, regional and global levels which makes it imperative for businesses to address issues such as global warming, biodiversity conservation and climate change in a comprehensive and systematic manner.</em><br><br><em>The principle encourages businesses to understand and be accountable for direct and indirect environmental impacts of their operations, products and services and to strive to make them more environment friendly.</em><br><br></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Source: [[http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latestnews/National_Voluntary_Guidelines_2011_12jul2011.pdf| Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs]]</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Does the company</span></span></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"> <strong>report the amount of emissions generated</strong>? The answer to this question may be found in the company's <strong>Sustainability</strong></span></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\"> or CSR Report</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Search in the company's environmental reporting to find out whether they report their emissions. </span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;\">When looking for the answer in the source, <strong>key words to search for</strong> </span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;\">include:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Emission</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Generated</span></span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">CO<sub style=\"color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif;\">2</sub></span></span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">If the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">does </span>report their emissions, select the answer <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes </span>and cite the report where you found this information as a source. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">If the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">does not </span>report their emissions select the answer <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">No </span>and cite the relevant report as a source.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">The company may report in fiscal years - in this case,<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> please use the latest year which is cited. </span></span></span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">A report for 2016/17 should be used for adding data for the year 2017 </span></span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Business Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "National Voluntary Guidelines+Emission Reported+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Emission_Reported+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Emission_Reported+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3765769,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Waste Reported",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Waste_Reported.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Waste Reported",
      "question": "Does the company report the amount of waste generated?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">These questions are a part of the National Guidelines on Social, Environmental and Economic Responsibilities for Business. They provide the bedrock on which responsible business in Indian companies are laid. Hence to have a yes to any of these questions or a company policy on these aspects strengthens the #ESG aspects of the company.<br><br>This particular metric question is inspired by <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">NVG Principle 6: Business should respect, protect, and make efforts to restore the environment.</span><br><br><em>The principle recognizes that environmental responsibility is a prerequisite for sustainable economic growth and for the well being of society.</em><br><br><em>The principle emphasizes that environmental issues are interconnected at the local, regional and global levels which makes it imperative for businesses to address issues such as global warming, biodiversity conservation and climate change in a comprehensive and systematic manner.</em><br><br><em>The principle encourages businesses to understand and be accountable for direct and indirect environmental impacts of their operations, products and services and to strive to make them more environment friendly.</em><br><br></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">Source: [[http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latestnews/National_Voluntary_Guidelines_2011_12jul2011.pdf| Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs]]</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Does the company</span></span></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\"> <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">report the amount of waste generated</span>? The answer to this question may be found in the company's <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Sustainability</span></span></span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; font-weight: bolder;\"> or CSR Report</span><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">Search in the company's environmental reporting to find out whether they report their generated waste. </span>When looking for the answer in the source, <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">key words to search for</span> include:<br></span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Principle 6</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Waste</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">Generated</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">If the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">does </span>report their <span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">waste generated</span>, select the answer <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes </span>and cite the report where you found this information as a source. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">If the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">does not </span>report their <span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">waste generated</span> select the answer <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">No </span>and cite the relevant report as a source.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">The company may report in fiscal years - in this case,<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"> please use the latest year which is cited. </span></span></span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">A report for 2016/17 should be used for adding data for the year 2017 </span></span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Business Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "National Voluntary Guidelines+Waste Reported+Laureen van Breen"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Waste_Reported+Laureen_van_Breen.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Waste_Reported+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3767331,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+Yearly change in disclosure rate on selected social and environmental metrics",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Yearly_change_in_disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "Yearly change in disclosure rate on selected social and environmental metrics",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 - m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3763843"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3763843",
          "year": "-1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 5463,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1344,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Yearly_change_in_disclosure_rate_on_selected_social_and_environmental_metrics+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3767414,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+Yearly change in collective bargaining representation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Yearly_change_in_collective_bargaining_representation.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "Yearly change in collective bargaining representation",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 - m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~813500"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~813500",
          "year": "-1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1515,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 591,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Yearly_change_in_collective_bargaining_representation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3767733,
      "name": "Commons+Industry",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Industry.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Industry",
      "question": "What are the company's industry or industries?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": "{\r\n  \"Agriculture, forestry and fishing\": \"A\",\r\n  \"Mining and quarrying\": \"B\",\r\n  \"Manufacturing\": \"C\",\r\n  \"Energy supply\": \"D\",\r\n  \"Water and waste management\": \"E\",\r\n  \"Construction\": \"F\",\r\n  \"Wholesale and retail trade\": \"G\",\r\n  \"Transportation and storage\": \"H\",\r\n  \"Accommodation and food services\": \"I\",\r\n  \"Information and communication\": \"J\",\r\n  \"Finance and insurance\": \"K\",\r\n  \"Real estate\": \"L\",\r\n  \"Professional, scientific and technical\": \"M\",\r\n  \"Administrative and support services\": \"N\",\r\n  \"Public administration and defence\": \"O\",\r\n  \"Education\": \"P\",\r\n  \"Human health and social work\": \"Q\",\r\n  \"Arts, entertainment and recreation\": \"R\",\r\n  \"Other service activities\": \"S\",\r\n  \"Households as employers\": \"T\",\r\n  \"Extraterritorial organizations\": \"U\"\r\n}\r\n",
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var act, actMap, anyKnown, financeMetrics, gri, griMap, hasBrands, isKnown, isicSection, mappedCodes, sicDivision, sicMap, supplierMetrics, val;\n\n  isicSection = m1;\n\n  sicDivision = m2;\n\n  hasBrands = m3;\n\n  financeMetrics = [m4, m5];\n\n  supplierMetrics = [m6, m7, m8, m9, m10];\n\n  gri = m11;\n\n  act = m12;\n\n  sicMap = {\n    A: \"A\",\n    B: \"B\",\n    C: \"F\",\n    D: \"C\",\n    F: \"G\",\n    G: \"G\",\n    H: \"K\",\n    J: \"O\"\n  };\n\n  griMap = {\n    \"Automotive\": [\"C\", \"G\"],\n    \"Chemicals\": \"C\",\n    \"Energy\": \"D\",\n    \"Metals Products\": \"C\",\n    \"Telecommunications\": \"J\",\n    \"Financial Services\": \"K\"\n  };\n\n  actMap = {\n    \"Consumption\": \"G\",\n    \"Energy & Resource Extraction\": \"D\",\n    \"Financials\": \"K\",\n    \"Health Care\": \"Q\",\n    \"Resource Transformation\": \"C\",\n    \"Technology & Communications\": \"J\",\n    \"Transportation\": \"H\"\n  };\n\n  isKnown = function(answer) {\n    return answer !== \"Unknown\";\n  };\n\n  anyKnown = function(answerList) {\n    return answerList.find(isKnown);\n  };\n\n  mappedCodes = function(answer, map) {\n    var codes;\n    if (!isKnown(answer)) {\n      return;\n    }\n    codes = answer.map(function(a) {\n      return map[a];\n    });\n    codes = codes.filter(Boolean);\n    if (codes.length) {\n      return codes;\n    }\n  };\n\n  if (isKnown(isicSection)) {\n    isicSection;\n  } else if (val = mappedCodes(sicDivision, sicMap)) {\n    val;\n  } else if (isKnown(hasBrands)) {\n    \"G\";\n  } else if (anyKnown(financeMetrics)) {\n    \"K\";\n  } else if (anyKnown(supplierMetrics)) {\n    \"C\";\n  } else if (val = griMap[gri]) {\n    val;\n  } else if (val = mappedCodes(act, actMap)) {\n    val;\n  } else {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3767741",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~7825123",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~5768810",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~4049102",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~5645712",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~4316413",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~3654387",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m8",
          "metric": "~4316776",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m9",
          "metric": "~4316896",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m10",
          "metric": "~2929015",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m11",
          "metric": "~887007",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m12",
          "metric": "~6248523",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 82099,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 82099,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Company_Category.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Industry+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3767741,
      "name": "ISIC+Industry Section",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ISIC+Industry_Section.json",
      "designer": "ISIC",
      "title": "Industry Section",
      "question": "What is the company's industry \"section\" (or sections) according to the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">see https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesM/seriesm_4rev4e.pdf</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": "{\r\n  \"Agriculture, forestry and fishing\": \"A\",\r\n  \"Mining and quarrying\": \"B\",\r\n  \"Manufacturing\": \"C\",\r\n  \"Energy supply\": \"D\",\r\n  \"Water and waste management\": \"E\",\r\n  \"Construction\": \"F\",\r\n  \"Wholesale and retail trade\": \"G\",\r\n  \"Transportation and storage\": \"H\",\r\n  \"Accommodation and food services\": \"I\",\r\n  \"Information and communication\": \"J\",\r\n  \"Finance and insurance\": \"K\",\r\n  \"Real estate\": \"L\",\r\n  \"Professional, scientific and technical\": \"M\",\r\n  \"Administrative and support services\": \"N\",\r\n  \"Public administration and defence\": \"O\",\r\n  \"Education\": \"P\",\r\n  \"Human health and social work\": \"Q\",\r\n  \"Arts, entertainment and recreation\": \"R\",\r\n  \"Other service activities\": \"S\",\r\n  \"Households as employers\": \"T\",\r\n  \"Extraterritorial organizations\": \"U\"\r\n}\r\n",
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var ranges, result;\n\n  ranges = {\n    A: [1, 3],\n    B: [5, 9],\n    C: [10, 33],\n    D: [35, 35],\n    E: [36, 39],\n    F: [41, 43],\n    G: [45, 47],\n    H: [49, 53],\n    I: [55, 56],\n    J: [58, 63],\n    K: [64, 66],\n    L: [68, 68],\n    M: [69, 75],\n    N: [77, 82],\n    O: [84, 84],\n    P: [85, 85],\n    Q: [86, 88],\n    R: [90, 93],\n    S: [94, 96],\n    T: [97, 98],\n    U: [99, 99]\n  };\n\n  result = [];\n\n  Object.keys(ranges).forEach(function(letter) {\n    var vals;\n    vals = ranges[letter];\n    return [m1].flat().forEach(function(number) {\n      if (number >= vals[0] && number <= vals[1]) {\n        return result.push(letter);\n      }\n    });\n  });\n\n  result;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3767749"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1351,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1350,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Industry.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ISIC+Industry_Section+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3767749,
      "name": "ISIC+Industry Division",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ISIC+Industry_Division.json",
      "designer": "ISIC",
      "title": "Industry Division",
      "question": "What is the company's industry \"division\" (or divisions) according to the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">see https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesM/seriesm_4rev4e.pdf</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": "{\r\n  \"Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities\": \"01\",\r\n  \"Forestry and logging\": \"02\",\r\n  \"Fishing and aquaculture\": \"03\",\r\n  \"Mining of coal and lignite\": \"05\",\r\n  \"Extraction of crude petroleum and natural gas\": \"06\",\r\n  \"Mining of metal ores\": \"07\",\r\n  \"Other mining and quarrying\": \"08\",\r\n  \"Mining support service activities\": \"09\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of food products\": \"10\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of beverages\": \"11\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of tobacco products\": \"12\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of textiles\": \"13\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of wearing apparel\": \"14\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of leather and related products\": \"15\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of wood and of products of wood and cork, except furniture; manufacture of articles of straw and plaiting materials\": \"16\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of paper and paper products\": \"17\",\r\n  \"Printing and reproduction of recorded media\": \"18\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of coke and refined petroleum products\": \"19\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of chemicals and chemical products\": \"20\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of pharmaceuticals, medicinal chemical and botanical products\": \"21\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of rubber and plastics products\": \"22\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products\": \"23\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of basic metals\": \"24\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of fabricated metal products, except machinery and equipment\": \"25\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of computer, electronic and optical products\": \"26\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of electrical equipment\": \"27\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of machinery and equipment n.e.c.\": \"28\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers\": \"29\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other transport equipment\": \"30\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of furniture\": \"31\",\r\n  \"Other manufacturing\": \"32\",\r\n  \"Repair and installation of machinery and equipment\": \"33\",\r\n  \"Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply\": \"35\",\r\n  \"Water collection, treatment and supply\": \"36\",\r\n  \"Sewerage\": \"37\",\r\n  \"Waste collection, treatment and disposal activities;  materials recovery\": \"38\",\r\n  \"Remediation activities and other waste management services\": \"39\",\r\n  \"Construction of buildings\": \"41\",\r\n  \"Civil engineering\": \"42\",\r\n  \"Specialized construction activities\": \"43\",\r\n  \"Wholesale and retail trade and repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles\": \"45\",\r\n  \"Wholesale trade, except of motor vehicles and motorcycles\": \"46\",\r\n  \"Retail trade, except of motor vehicles and motorcycles\": \"47\",\r\n  \"Land transport and transport via pipelines\": \"49\",\r\n  \"Water transport\": \"50\",\r\n  \"Air transport\": \"51\",\r\n  \"Warehousing and support activities for transportation\": \"52\",\r\n  \"Postal and courier activities\": \"53\",\r\n  \"Accommodation\": \"55\",\r\n  \"Food and beverage service activities\": \"56\",\r\n  \"Publishing activities\": \"58\",\r\n  \"Motion picture, video and television programme production, sound recording and music publishing activities\": \"59\",\r\n  \"Programming and broadcasting activities\": \"60\",\r\n  \"Telecommunications\": \"61\",\r\n  \"Computer programming, consultancy and related activities\": \"62\",\r\n  \"Information service activities\": \"63\",\r\n  \"Financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding\": \"64\",\r\n  \"Insurance, reinsurance and pension funding, except compulsory social security\": \"65\",\r\n  \"Activities auxiliary to financial service and insurance activities\": \"66\",\r\n  \"Real estate activities\": \"68\",\r\n  \"Legal and accounting activities\": \"69\",\r\n  \"Activities of head offices;  management consultancy activities\": \"70\",\r\n  \"Architectural and engineering activities;  technical testing and analysis\": \"71\",\r\n  \"Scientific research and development\": \"72\",\r\n  \"Advertising and market research\": \"73\",\r\n  \"Other professional, scientific and technical activities\": \"74\",\r\n  \"Veterinary activities\": \"75\",\r\n  \"Rental and leasing activities\": \"77\",\r\n  \"Employment activities\": \"78\",\r\n  \"Travel agency, tour operator, reservation service and related activities\": \"79\",\r\n  \"Security and investigation activities\": \"80\",\r\n  \"Services to buildings and landscape activities\": \"81\",\r\n  \"Office administrative, office support and other business support activities\": \"82\",\r\n  \"Public administration and defence; compulsory social security\": \"84\",\r\n  \"Education\": \"85\",\r\n  \"Human health activities\": \"86\",\r\n  \"Residential care activities\": \"87\",\r\n  \"Social work activities without accommodation\": \"88\",\r\n  \"Creative, arts and entertainment activities\": \"90\",\r\n  \"Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities\": \"91\",\r\n  \"Gambling and betting activities\": \"92\",\r\n  \"Sports activities and amusement and recreation activities\": \"93\",\r\n  \"Activities of membership organizations\": \"94\",\r\n  \"Repair of computers and personal and household goods\": \"95\",\r\n  \"Other personal service activities\": \"96\",\r\n  \"Activities of households as employers of domestic personnel\": \"97\",\r\n  \"Undifferentiated goods- and services-producing activities of private households for own use\": \"98\",\r\n  \"Activities of extraterritorial organizations and bodies\": \"99\"\r\n}\r\n",
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var results;\n\n  results = [];\n\n  [m1].flat().forEach(function(number) {\n    return results.push(String(number).padStart(3, \"0\").slice(0, 2));\n  });\n\n  results;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3767757"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1351,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1350,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/ISIC+Industry_Section.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ISIC+Industry_Division+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3767757,
      "name": "ISIC+Industry Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ISIC+Industry_Group.json",
      "designer": "ISIC",
      "title": "Industry Group",
      "question": "What is the company's industry \"group\" (or groups) according to the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>see https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesM/seriesm_4rev4e.pdf</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": "{\r\n  \"Growing of non-perennial crops\": \"011\",\r\n  \"Growing of perennial crops\": \"012\",\r\n  \"Plant propagation\": \"013\",\r\n  \"Animal production\": \"014\",\r\n  \"Mixed farming\": \"015\",\r\n  \"Support activities to agriculture and post-harvest crop activities\": \"016\",\r\n  \"Hunting, trapping and related service activities\": \"017\",\r\n  \"Silviculture and other forestry activities\": \"021\",\r\n  \"Logging\": \"022\",\r\n  \"Gathering of non-wood forest products\": \"023\",\r\n  \"Support services to forestry\": \"024\",\r\n  \"Fishing\": \"031\",\r\n  \"Aquaculture\": \"032\",\r\n  \"Mining of hard coal\": \"051\",\r\n  \"Mining of lignite\": \"052\",\r\n  \"Extraction of crude petroleum\": \"061\",\r\n  \"Extraction of natural gas\": \"062\",\r\n  \"Mining of iron ores\": \"071\",\r\n  \"Mining of non-ferrous metal ores\": \"072\",\r\n  \"Quarrying of stone, sand and clay\": \"081\",\r\n  \"Mining and quarrying n.e.c.\": \"089\",\r\n  \"Support activities for petroleum and natural gas extraction\": \"091\",\r\n  \"Support activities for other mining and quarrying\": \"099\",\r\n  \"Processing and preserving of meat\": \"101\",\r\n  \"Processing and preserving of fish, crustaceans and molluscs\": \"102\",\r\n  \"Processing and preserving of fruit and vegetables\": \"103\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of vegetable and animal oils and fats\": \"104\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of dairy products\": \"105\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of grain mill products, starches and starch products\": \"106\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other food products\": \"107\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of prepared animal feeds\": \"108\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of beverages\": \"110\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of tobacco products\": \"120\",\r\n  \"Spinning, weaving and finishing of textiles\": \"131\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other textiles\": \"139\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of wearing apparel, except fur apparel\": \"141\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of articles of fur\": \"142\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of knitted and crocheted apparel\": \"143\",\r\n  \"Tanning and dressing of leather; manufacture of luggage, handbags, saddlery and harness; dressing and dyeing of fur\": \"151\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of footwear\": \"152\",\r\n  \"Sawmilling and planing of wood\": \"161\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of products of wood, cork, straw and plaiting materials\": \"162\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of paper and paper products\": \"170\",\r\n  \"Printing and service activities related to printing\": \"181\",\r\n  \"Reproduction of recorded media\": \"182\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of coke oven products\": \"191\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of refined petroleum products\": \"192\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of basic chemicals, fertilizers and nitrogen compounds, plastics and synthetic rubber in primary forms\": \"201\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other chemical products\": \"202\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of man-made fibres\": \"203\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of pharmaceuticals, medicinal chemical and botanical products\": \"210\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of rubber products\": \"221\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of plastics products\": \"222\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of glass and glass products\": \"231\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of non-metallic mineral products n.e.c.\": \"239\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of basic iron and steel\": \"241\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of basic precious and other non-ferrous metals\": \"242\",\r\n  \"Casting of metals\": \"243\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of structural metal products, tanks, reservoirs and steam generators\": \"251\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of weapons and ammunition\": \"252\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other fabricated metal products;  metalworking service activities\": \"259\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of electronic components and boards\": \"261\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of computers and peripheral equipment\": \"262\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of communication equipment\": \"263\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of consumer electronics\": \"264\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of measuring, testing, navigating and control equipment; watches and clocks\": \"265\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of irradiation, electromedical and electrotherapeutic equipment\": \"266\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of optical instruments and photographic equipment\": \"267\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of magnetic and optical media\": \"268\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of electric motors, generators, transformers and electricity distribution and control apparatus\": \"271\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of batteries and accumulators\": \"272\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of wiring and wiring devices\": \"273\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of electric lighting equipment\": \"274\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of domestic appliances\": \"275\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other electrical equipment\": \"279\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of general-purpose machinery\": \"281\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of special-purpose machinery\": \"282\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of motor vehicles\": \"291\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of bodies (coachwork) for motor vehicles;  manufacture of trailers and semi-trailers\": \"292\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of parts and accessories for motor vehicles\": \"293\",\r\n  \"Building of ships and boats\": \"301\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of railway locomotives and rolling stock\": \"302\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of air and spacecraft and related machinery\": \"303\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of military fighting vehicles\": \"304\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of transport equipment n.e.c.\": \"309\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of furniture\": \"310\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of jewellery, bijouterie and related articles\": \"321\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of musical instruments\": \"322\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of sports goods\": \"323\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of games and toys\": \"324\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of medical and dental instruments and supplies\": \"325\",\r\n  \"Other manufacturing n.e.c.\": \"329\",\r\n  \"Repair of fabricated metal products, machinery and equipment\": \"331\",\r\n  \"Installation of industrial machinery and equipment\": \"332\",\r\n  \"Electric power generation, transmission and distribution\": \"351\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of gas;  distribution of gaseous fuels through mains\": \"352\",\r\n  \"Steam and air conditioning supply\": \"353\",\r\n  \"Water collection, treatment and supply\": \"360\",\r\n  \"Sewerage\": \"370\",\r\n  \"Waste collection\": \"381\",\r\n  \"Waste treatment and disposal\": \"382\",\r\n  \"Materials recovery\": \"383\",\r\n  \"Remediation activities and other waste management services\": \"390\",\r\n  \"Construction of buildings\": \"410\",\r\n  \"Construction of roads and railways\": \"421\",\r\n  \"Construction of utility projects\": \"422\",\r\n  \"Construction of other civil engineering projects\": \"429\",\r\n  \"Demolition and site preparation\": \"431\",\r\n  \"Electrical, plumbing and other construction installation activities\": \"432\",\r\n  \"Building completion and finishing\": \"433\",\r\n  \"Other specialized construction activities\": \"439\",\r\n  \"Sale of motor vehicles\": \"451\",\r\n  \"Maintenance and repair of motor vehicles\": \"452\",\r\n  \"Sale of motor vehicle parts and accessories\": \"453\",\r\n  \"Sale, maintenance and repair of motorcycles and related parts and accessories\": \"454\",\r\n  \"Wholesale on a fee or contract basis\": \"461\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of agricultural raw materials and live animals\": \"462\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of food, beverages and tobacco\": \"463\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of household goods\": \"464\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of machinery, equipment and supplies\": \"465\",\r\n  \"Other specialized wholesale\": \"466\",\r\n  \"Non-specialized wholesale trade\": \"469\",\r\n  \"Retail sale in non-specialized stores\": \"471\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of food, beverages and tobacco in specialized stores\": \"472\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of automotive fuel in specialized stores\": \"473\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of information and communications equipment in specialized stores\": \"474\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of other household equipment in specialized stores\": \"475\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of cultural and recreation goods in specialized stores\": \"476\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of other goods in specialized stores\": \"477\",\r\n  \"Retail sale via stalls and markets\": \"478\",\r\n  \"Retail trade not in stores, stalls or markets\": \"479\",\r\n  \"Transport via railways\": \"491\",\r\n  \"Other land transport\": \"492\",\r\n  \"Transport via pipeline\": \"493\",\r\n  \"Sea and coastal water transport\": \"501\",\r\n  \"Inland water transport\": \"502\",\r\n  \"Passenger air transport\": \"511\",\r\n  \"Freight air transport\": \"512\",\r\n  \"Warehousing and storage\": \"521\",\r\n  \"Support activities for transportation\": \"522\",\r\n  \"Postal activities\": \"531\",\r\n  \"Courier activities\": \"532\",\r\n  \"Short term accommodation activities\": \"551\",\r\n  \"Camping grounds, recreational vehicle parks and trailer parks\": \"552\",\r\n  \"Other accommodation\": \"559\",\r\n  \"Restaurants and mobile food service activities\": \"561\",\r\n  \"Event catering and other food service activities\": \"562\",\r\n  \"Beverage serving activities\": \"563\",\r\n  \"Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing activities\": \"581\",\r\n  \"Software publishing\": \"582\",\r\n  \"Motion picture, video and television programme activities\": \"591\",\r\n  \"Sound recording and music publishing activities\": \"592\",\r\n  \"Radio broadcasting\": \"601\",\r\n  \"Television programming and broadcasting activities\": \"602\",\r\n  \"Wired telecommunications activities\": \"611\",\r\n  \"Wireless telecommunications activities\": \"612\",\r\n  \"Satellite telecommunications activities\": \"613\",\r\n  \"Other telecommunications activities\": \"619\",\r\n  \"Computer programming, consultancy and related activities\": \"620\",\r\n  \"Data processing, hosting and related activities;  web portals\": \"631\",\r\n  \"Other information service activities\": \"639\",\r\n  \"Monetary intermediation\": \"641\",\r\n  \"Activities of holding companies\": \"642\",\r\n  \"Trusts, funds and similar financial entities\": \"643\",\r\n  \"Other financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding activities\": \"649\",\r\n  \"Insurance\": \"651\",\r\n  \"Reinsurance\": \"652\",\r\n  \"Pension funding\": \"653\",\r\n  \"Activities auxiliary to financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding\": \"661\",\r\n  \"Activities auxiliary to insurance and pension funding\": \"662\",\r\n  \"Fund management activities\": \"663\",\r\n  \"Real estate activities with own or leased property\": \"681\",\r\n  \"Real estate activities on a fee or contract basis\": \"682\",\r\n  \"Legal activities\": \"691\",\r\n  \"Accounting, bookkeeping and auditing activities;  tax consultancy\": \"692\",\r\n  \"Activities of head offices\": \"701\",\r\n  \"Management consultancy activities\": \"702\",\r\n  \"Architectural and engineering activities and related technical consultancy\": \"711\",\r\n  \"Technical testing and analysis\": \"712\",\r\n  \"Research and experimental development on natural sciences and engineering\": \"721\",\r\n  \"Research and experimental development on social sciences and humanities\": \"722\",\r\n  \"Advertising\": \"731\",\r\n  \"Market research and public opinion polling\": \"732\",\r\n  \"Specialized design activities\": \"741\",\r\n  \"Photographic activities\": \"742\",\r\n  \"Other professional, scientific and technical activities n.e.c.\": \"749\",\r\n  \"Veterinary activities\": \"750\",\r\n  \"Renting and leasing of motor vehicles\": \"771\",\r\n  \"Renting and leasing of personal and household goods\": \"772\",\r\n  \"Renting and leasing of other machinery, equipment and tangible goods\": \"773\",\r\n  \"Leasing of intellectual property and similar products, except copyrighted works\": \"774\",\r\n  \"Activities of employment placement agencies\": \"781\",\r\n  \"Temporary employment agency activities\": \"782\",\r\n  \"Other human resources provision\": \"783\",\r\n  \"Travel agency and tour operator activities\": \"791\",\r\n  \"Other reservation service and related activities\": \"799\",\r\n  \"Private security activities\": \"801\",\r\n  \"Security systems service activities\": \"802\",\r\n  \"Investigation activities\": \"803\",\r\n  \"Combined facilities support activities\": \"811\",\r\n  \"Cleaning activities\": \"812\",\r\n  \"Landscape care and maintenance service activities\": \"813\",\r\n  \"Office administrative and support activities\": \"821\",\r\n  \"Activities of call centres\": \"822\",\r\n  \"Organization of conventions and trade shows\": \"823\",\r\n  \"Business support service activities n.e.c.\": \"829\",\r\n  \"Administration of the State and the economic and social policy of the community\": \"841\",\r\n  \"Provision of services to the community as a whole\": \"842\",\r\n  \"Compulsory social security activities\": \"843\",\r\n  \"Pre-primary and primary education\": \"851\",\r\n  \"Secondary education\": \"852\",\r\n  \"Higher education\": \"853\",\r\n  \"Other education\": \"854\",\r\n  \"Educational support activities\": \"855\",\r\n  \"Hospital activities\": \"861\",\r\n  \"Medical and dental practice activities\": \"862\",\r\n  \"Other human health activities\": \"869\",\r\n  \"Residential nursing care facilities\": \"871\",\r\n  \"Residential care activities for mental retardation, mental health and substance abuse\": \"872\",\r\n  \"Residential care activities for the elderly and disabled\": \"873\",\r\n  \"Other residential care activities\": \"879\",\r\n  \"Social work activities without accommodation for the elderly and disabled\": \"881\",\r\n  \"Other social work activities without accommodation\": \"889\",\r\n  \"Creative, arts and entertainment activities\": \"900\",\r\n  \"Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities\": \"910\",\r\n  \"Gambling and betting activities\": \"920\",\r\n  \"Sports activities\": \"931\",\r\n  \"Other amusement and recreation activities\": \"932\",\r\n  \"Activities of business, employers and professional membership organizations\": \"941\",\r\n  \"Activities of trade unions\": \"942\",\r\n  \"Activities of other membership organizations\": \"949\",\r\n  \"Repair of computers and communication equipment\": \"951\",\r\n  \"Repair of personal and household goods\": \"952\",\r\n  \"Other personal service activities\": \"960\",\r\n  \"Activities of households as employers of domestic personnel\": \"970\",\r\n  \"Undifferentiated goods-producing activities of private households for own use\": \"981\",\r\n  \"Undifferentiated service-producing activities of private households for own use\": \"982\",\r\n  \"Activities of extraterritorial organizations and bodies\": \"990\"\r\n}\r\n",
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var results;\n\n  results = [];\n\n  [m1].flat().forEach(function(number) {\n    return results.push(String(number).padStart(4, \"0\").slice(0, 3));\n  });\n\n  results;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3767765"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1351,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1350,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/ISIC+Industry_Division.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ISIC+Industry_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3767765,
      "name": "ISIC+Industry Class",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ISIC+Industry_Class.json",
      "designer": "ISIC",
      "title": "Industry Class",
      "question": "What is the company's industry \"class\" (or classes) according to the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC)?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">see https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesM/seriesm_4rev4e.pdf</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": "{\r\n  \"Growing of cereals (except rice), leguminous crops and oil seeds\": \"0111\",\r\n  \"Growing of rice\": \"0112\",\r\n  \"Growing of vegetables and melons, roots and tubers\": \"0113\",\r\n  \"Growing of sugar cane\": \"0114\",\r\n  \"Growing of tobacco\": \"0115\",\r\n  \"Growing of fibre crops\": \"0116\",\r\n  \"Growing of other non-perennial crops\": \"0119\",\r\n  \"Growing of grapes\": \"0121\",\r\n  \"Growing of tropical and subtropical fruits\": \"0122\",\r\n  \"Growing of citrus fruits\": \"0123\",\r\n  \"Growing of pome fruits and stone fruits\": \"0124\",\r\n  \"Growing of other tree and bush fruits and nuts\": \"0125\",\r\n  \"Growing of oleaginous fruits\": \"0126\",\r\n  \"Growing of beverage crops\": \"0127\",\r\n  \"Growing of spices, aromatic, drug and pharmaceutical crops\": \"0128\",\r\n  \"Growing of other perennial crops\": \"0129\",\r\n  \"Plant propagation\": \"0130\",\r\n  \"Raising of cattle and buffaloes\": \"0141\",\r\n  \"Raising of horses and other equines\": \"0142\",\r\n  \"Raising of camels and camelids\": \"0143\",\r\n  \"Raising of sheep and goats\": \"0144\",\r\n  \"Raising of swine/pigs\": \"0145\",\r\n  \"Raising of poultry\": \"0146\",\r\n  \"Raising of other animals\": \"0149\",\r\n  \"Mixed farming\": \"0150\",\r\n  \"Support activities for crop production\": \"0161\",\r\n  \"Support activities for animal production\": \"0162\",\r\n  \"Post-harvest crop activities\": \"0163\",\r\n  \"Seed processing for propagation\": \"0164\",\r\n  \"Hunting, trapping and related service activities\": \"0170\",\r\n  \"Silviculture and other forestry activities\": \"0210\",\r\n  \"Logging\": \"0220\",\r\n  \"Gathering of non-wood forest products\": \"0230\",\r\n  \"Support services to forestry\": \"0240\",\r\n  \"Marine fishing\": \"0311\",\r\n  \"Freshwater fishing\": \"0312\",\r\n  \"Marine aquaculture\": \"0321\",\r\n  \"Freshwater aquaculture\": \"0322\",\r\n  \"Mining of hard coal\": \"0510\",\r\n  \"Mining of lignite\": \"0520\",\r\n  \"Extraction of crude petroleum\": \"0610\",\r\n  \"Extraction of natural gas\": \"0620\",\r\n  \"Mining of iron ores\": \"0710\",\r\n  \"Mining of uranium and thorium ores\": \"0721\",\r\n  \"Mining of other non-ferrous metal ores\": \"0729\",\r\n  \"Quarrying of stone, sand and clay\": \"0810\",\r\n  \"Mining of chemical and fertilizer minerals\": \"0891\",\r\n  \"Extraction of peat\": \"0892\",\r\n  \"Extraction of salt\": \"0893\",\r\n  \"Other mining and quarrying n.e.c.\": \"0899\",\r\n  \"Support activities for petroleum and natural gas extraction\": \"0910\",\r\n  \"Support activities for other mining and quarrying\": \"0990\",\r\n  \"Processing and preserving of meat\": \"1010\",\r\n  \"Processing and preserving of fish, crustaceans and molluscs\": \"1020\",\r\n  \"Processing and preserving of fruit and vegetables\": \"1030\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of vegetable and animal oils and fats\": \"1040\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of dairy products\": \"1050\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of grain mill products\": \"1061\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of starches and starch products\": \"1062\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of bakery products\": \"1071\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of sugar\": \"1072\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of cocoa, chocolate and sugar confectionery\": \"1073\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of macaroni, noodles, couscous and similar farinaceous products\": \"1074\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of prepared meals and dishes\": \"1075\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other food products n.e.c.\": \"1079\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of prepared animal feeds\": \"1080\",\r\n  \"Distilling, rectifying and blending of spirits\": \"1101\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of wines\": \"1102\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of malt liquors and malt\": \"1103\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of soft drinks;  production of mineral waters and other bottled waters\": \"1104\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of tobacco products\": \"1200\",\r\n  \"Preparation and spinning of textile fibres\": \"1311\",\r\n  \"Weaving of textiles\": \"1312\",\r\n  \"Finishing of textiles\": \"1313\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of knitted and crocheted fabrics\": \"1391\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of made-up textile articles, except apparel\": \"1392\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of carpets and rugs\": \"1393\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of cordage, rope, twine and netting\": \"1394\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other textiles n.e.c.\": \"1399\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of wearing apparel, except fur apparel\": \"1410\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of articles of fur\": \"1420\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of knitted and crocheted apparel\": \"1430\",\r\n  \"Tanning and dressing of leather; dressing and dyeing of fur\": \"1511\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of luggage, handbags and the like, saddlery and harness\": \"1512\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of footwear\": \"1520\",\r\n  \"Sawmilling and planing of wood\": \"1610\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of veneer sheets and wood-based panels\": \"1621\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of builders carpentry and joinery\": \"1622\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of wooden containers\": \"1623\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other products of wood; manufacture of articles of cork, straw and plaiting materials\": \"1629\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of pulp, paper and paperboard\": \"1701\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of corrugated paper and paperboard and of containers of paper and paperboard\": \"1702\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other articles of paper and paperboard\": \"1709\",\r\n  \"Printing\": \"1811\",\r\n  \"Service activities related to printing\": \"1812\",\r\n  \"Reproduction of recorded media\": \"1820\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of coke oven products\": \"1910\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of refined petroleum products\": \"1920\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of basic chemicals\": \"2011\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of fertilizers and nitrogen compounds\": \"2012\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of plastics and synthetic rubber in primary forms\": \"2013\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of pesticides and other agrochemical products\": \"2021\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of paints, varnishes and similar coatings, printing ink and mastics\": \"2022\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of soap and detergents, cleaning and polishing preparations, perfumes and toilet preparations\": \"2023\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other chemical products n.e.c.\": \"2029\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of man-made fibres\": \"2030\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of pharmaceuticals, medicinal chemical and botanical products\": \"2100\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of rubber tyres and tubes; retreading and rebuilding of rubber tyres\": \"2211\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other rubber products\": \"2219\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of plastics products\": \"2220\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of glass and glass products\": \"2310\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of refractory products\": \"2391\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of clay building materials\": \"2392\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other porcelain and ceramic products\": \"2393\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of cement, lime and plaster\": \"2394\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of articles of concrete, cement and plaster\": \"2395\",\r\n  \"Cutting, shaping and finishing of stone\": \"2396\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products n.e.c.\": \"2399\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of basic iron and steel\": \"2410\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of basic precious and other non-ferrous metals\": \"2420\",\r\n  \"Casting of iron and steel\": \"2431\",\r\n  \"Casting of non-ferrous metals\": \"2432\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of structural metal products\": \"2511\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of tanks, reservoirs and containers of metal\": \"2512\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of steam generators, except central heating hot water boilers\": \"2513\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of weapons and ammunition\": \"2520\",\r\n  \"Forging, pressing, stamping and roll-forming of metal\": \"2591\",\r\n  \"Treatment and coating of metals\": \"2592\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of cutlery, hand tools and general hardware\": \"2593\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other fabricated metal products n.e.c.\": \"2599\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of electronic components and boards\": \"2610\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of computers and peripheral equipment\": \"2620\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of communication equipment\": \"2630\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of consumer electronics\": \"2640\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of measuring, testing, navigating and control equipment\": \"2651\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of watches and clocks\": \"2652\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of irradiation, electromedical and electrotherapeutic equipment\": \"2660\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of optical instruments and photographic equipment\": \"2670\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of magnetic and optical media\": \"2680\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of electric motors, generators, transformers and electricity distribution and control apparatus\": \"2710\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of batteries and accumulators\": \"2720\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of fibre optic cables\": \"2731\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other electronic and electric wires and cables\": \"2732\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of wiring devices\": \"2733\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of electric lighting equipment\": \"2740\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of domestic appliances\": \"2750\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other electrical equipment\": \"2790\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of engines and turbines, except aircraft, vehicle and cycle engines\": \"2811\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of fluid power equipment\": \"2812\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other pumps, compressors, taps and valves\": \"2813\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of bearings, gears, gearing and driving elements\": \"2814\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of ovens, furnaces and furnace burners\": \"2815\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of lifting and handling equipment\": \"2816\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of office machinery and equipment (except computers and peripheral equipment)\": \"2817\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of power-driven hand tools\": \"2818\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other general-purpose machinery\": \"2819\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of agricultural and forestry machinery\": \"2821\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of metal-forming machinery and machine tools\": \"2822\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of machinery for metallurgy\": \"2823\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of machinery for mining, quarrying and construction\": \"2824\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of machinery for food, beverage and tobacco processing\": \"2825\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of machinery for textile, apparel and leather production\": \"2826\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other special-purpose machinery\": \"2829\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of motor vehicles\": \"2910\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of bodies (coachwork) for motor vehicles\": \"2920\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of parts and accessories for motor vehicles\": \"2930\",\r\n  \"Building of ships and floating structures\": \"3011\",\r\n  \"Building of pleasure and sporting boats\": \"3012\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of railway locomotives and rolling stock\": \"3020\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of air and spacecraft and related machinery\": \"3030\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of military fighting vehicles\": \"3040\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of motorcycles\": \"3091\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of bicycles and invalid carriages\": \"3092\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other transport equipment n.e.c.\": \"3099\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of furniture\": \"3100\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of jewellery and related articles\": \"3211\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of imitation jewellery and related articles\": \"3212\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of musical instruments\": \"3220\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of sports goods\": \"3230\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of games and toys\": \"3240\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of medical and dental instruments and supplies\": \"3250\",\r\n  \"Other manufacturing n.e.c.\": \"3290\",\r\n  \"Repair of fabricated metal products\": \"3311\",\r\n  \"Repair of machinery\": \"3312\",\r\n  \"Repair of electronic and optical equipment\": \"3313\",\r\n  \"Repair of electrical equipment\": \"3314\",\r\n  \"Repair of transport equipment, except motor vehicles\": \"3315\",\r\n  \"Repair of other equipment\": \"3319\",\r\n  \"Installation of industrial machinery and equipment\": \"3320\",\r\n  \"Electric power generation, transmission and distribution\": \"3510\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of gas\": \"3520\",\r\n  \"Steam and air conditioning supply\": \"3530\",\r\n  \"Water collection, treatment and supply\": \"3600\",\r\n  \"Sewerage\": \"3700\",\r\n  \"Collection of non-hazardous waste\": \"3811\",\r\n  \"Collection of hazardous waste\": \"3812\",\r\n  \"Treatment and disposal of non-hazardous waste\": \"3821\",\r\n  \"Treatment and disposal of hazardous waste\": \"3822\",\r\n  \"Materials recovery\": \"3830\",\r\n  \"Remediation activities and other waste management services\": \"3900\",\r\n  \"Construction of buildings\": \"4100\",\r\n  \"Construction of roads and railways\": \"4210\",\r\n  \"Construction of utility projects\": \"4220\",\r\n  \"Construction of other civil engineering projects\": \"4290\",\r\n  \"Demolition\": \"4311\",\r\n  \"Site preparation\": \"4312\",\r\n  \"Electrical installation\": \"4321\",\r\n  \"Plumbing, heat and air-conditioning installation\": \"4322\",\r\n  \"Other construction installation\": \"4329\",\r\n  \"Building completion and finishing\": \"4330\",\r\n  \"Other specialized construction activities\": \"4390\",\r\n  \"Sale of motor vehicles\": \"4510\",\r\n  \"Maintenance and repair of motor vehicles\": \"4520\",\r\n  \"Sale of motor vehicle parts and accessories\": \"4530\",\r\n  \"Sale, maintenance and repair of motorcycles and related parts and accessories\": \"4540\",\r\n  \"Wholesale on a fee or contract basis\": \"4610\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of agricultural raw materials and live animals\": \"4620\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of food, beverages and tobacco\": \"4630\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of textiles, clothing and footwear\": \"4641\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of other household goods\": \"4649\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of computers, computer peripheral equipment and software\": \"4651\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of electronic and telecommunications equipment and parts\": \"4652\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of agricultural machinery, equipment and supplies\": \"4653\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of other machinery and equipment\": \"4659\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels and related products\": \"4661\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of metals and metal ores\": \"4662\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of construction materials, hardware, plumbing and heating equipment and supplies\": \"4663\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of waste and scrap and other products n.e.c.\": \"4669\",\r\n  \"Non-specialized wholesale trade\": \"4690\",\r\n  \"Retail sale in non-specialized stores with food, beverages or tobacco predominating\": \"4711\",\r\n  \"Other retail sale in non-specialized stores\": \"4719\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of food in specialized stores\": \"4721\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of beverages in specialized stores\": \"4722\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of tobacco products in specialized stores\": \"4723\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of automotive fuel in specialized stores\": \"4730\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of computers, peripheral units, software and telecommunications equipment in specialized stores\": \"4741\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of audio and video equipment in specialized stores\": \"4742\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of textiles in specialized stores\": \"4751\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of hardware, paints and glass in specialized stores\": \"4752\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of carpets, rugs, wall and floor coverings in specialized stores\": \"4753\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of electrical household appliances, furniture, lighting equipment and other household articles in specialized stores\": \"4759\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of books, newspapers and stationary in specialized stores\": \"4761\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of music and video recordings in specialized stores\": \"4762\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of sporting equipment in specialized stores\": \"4763\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of games and toys in specialized stores\": \"4764\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of clothing, footwear and leather articles in specialized stores\": \"4771\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of pharmaceutical and medical goods, cosmetic and toilet articles in specialized stores\": \"4772\",\r\n  \"Other retail sale of new goods in specialized stores\": \"4773\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of second-hand goods\": \"4774\",\r\n  \"Retail sale via stalls and markets of food, beverages and tobacco products\": \"4781\",\r\n  \"Retail sale via stalls and markets of textiles, clothing and footwear\": \"4782\",\r\n  \"Retail sale via stalls and markets of other goods\": \"4789\",\r\n  \"Retail sale via mail order houses or via Internet\": \"4791\",\r\n  \"Other retail sale not in stores, stalls or markets\": \"4799\",\r\n  \"Passenger rail transport, interurban\": \"4911\",\r\n  \"Freight rail transport\": \"4912\",\r\n  \"Urban and suburban passenger land transport\": \"4921\",\r\n  \"Other passenger land transport\": \"4922\",\r\n  \"Freight transport by road\": \"4923\",\r\n  \"Transport via pipeline\": \"4930\",\r\n  \"Sea and coastal passenger water transport\": \"5011\",\r\n  \"Sea and coastal freight water transport\": \"5012\",\r\n  \"Inland passenger water transport\": \"5021\",\r\n  \"Inland freight water transport\": \"5022\",\r\n  \"Passenger air transport\": \"5110\",\r\n  \"Freight air transport\": \"5120\",\r\n  \"Warehousing and storage\": \"5210\",\r\n  \"Service activities incidental to land transportation\": \"5221\",\r\n  \"Service activities incidental to water transportation\": \"5222\",\r\n  \"Service activities incidental to air transportation\": \"5223\",\r\n  \"Cargo handling\": \"5224\",\r\n  \"Other transportation support activities\": \"5229\",\r\n  \"Postal activities\": \"5310\",\r\n  \"Courier activities\": \"5320\",\r\n  \"Short term accommodation activities\": \"5510\",\r\n  \"Camping grounds, recreational vehicle parks and trailer parks\": \"5520\",\r\n  \"Other accommodation\": \"5590\",\r\n  \"Restaurants and mobile food service activities\": \"5610\",\r\n  \"Event catering\": \"5621\",\r\n  \"Other food service activities\": \"5629\",\r\n  \"Beverage serving activities\": \"5630\",\r\n  \"Book publishing\": \"5811\",\r\n  \"Publishing of directories and mailing lists\": \"5812\",\r\n  \"Publishing of newspapers, journals and periodicals\": \"5813\",\r\n  \"Other publishing activities\": \"5819\",\r\n  \"Software publishing\": \"5820\",\r\n  \"Motion picture, video and television programme production activities\": \"5911\",\r\n  \"Motion picture, video and television programme post-production activities\": \"5912\",\r\n  \"Motion picture, video and television programme distribution activities\": \"5913\",\r\n  \"Motion picture projection activities\": \"5914\",\r\n  \"Sound recording and music publishing activities\": \"5920\",\r\n  \"Radio broadcasting\": \"6010\",\r\n  \"Television programming and broadcasting activities\": \"6020\",\r\n  \"Wired telecommunications activities\": \"6110\",\r\n  \"Wireless telecommunications activities\": \"6120\",\r\n  \"Satellite telecommunications activities\": \"6130\",\r\n  \"Other telecommunications activities\": \"6190\",\r\n  \"Computer programming activities\": \"6201\",\r\n  \"Computer consultancy and computer facilities management activities\": \"6202\",\r\n  \"Other information technology and computer service activities\": \"6209\",\r\n  \"Data processing, hosting and related activities\": \"6311\",\r\n  \"Web portals\": \"6312\",\r\n  \"News agency activities\": \"6391\",\r\n  \"Other information service activities n.e.c.\": \"6399\",\r\n  \"Central banking\": \"6411\",\r\n  \"Other monetary intermediation\": \"6419\",\r\n  \"Activities of holding companies\": \"6420\",\r\n  \"Trusts, funds and similar financial entities\": \"6430\",\r\n  \"Financial leasing\": \"6491\",\r\n  \"Other credit granting\": \"6492\",\r\n  \"Other financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding activities, n.e.c.\": \"6499\",\r\n  \"Life insurance\": \"6511\",\r\n  \"Non-life insurance\": \"6512\",\r\n  \"Reinsurance\": \"6520\",\r\n  \"Pension funding\": \"6530\",\r\n  \"Administration of financial markets\": \"6611\",\r\n  \"Security and commodity contracts brokerage\": \"6612\",\r\n  \"Other activities auxiliary to financial service activities\": \"6619\",\r\n  \"Risk and damage evaluation\": \"6621\",\r\n  \"Activities of insurance agents and brokers\": \"6622\",\r\n  \"Other activities auxiliary to insurance and pension funding\": \"6629\",\r\n  \"Fund management activities\": \"6630\",\r\n  \"Real estate activities with own or leased property\": \"6810\",\r\n  \"Real estate activities on a fee or contract basis\": \"6820\",\r\n  \"Legal activities\": \"6910\",\r\n  \"Accounting, bookkeeping and auditing activities\": \"6920\",\r\n  \"Activities of head offices\": \"7010\",\r\n  \"Management consultancy activities\": \"7020\",\r\n  \"Architectural and engineering activities and related technical consultancy\": \"7110\",\r\n  \"Technical testing and analysis\": \"7120\",\r\n  \"Research and experimental development on natural sciences and engineering\": \"7210\",\r\n  \"Research and experimental development on social sciences and humanities\": \"7220\",\r\n  \"Advertising\": \"7310\",\r\n  \"Market research and public opinion polling\": \"7320\",\r\n  \"Specialized design activities\": \"7410\",\r\n  \"Photographic activities\": \"7420\",\r\n  \"Other professional, scientific and technical activities n.e.c.\": \"7490\",\r\n  \"Veterinary activities\": \"7500\",\r\n  \"Renting and leasing of motor vehicles\": \"7710\",\r\n  \"Renting and leasing of recreational and sports goods\": \"7721\",\r\n  \"Renting of video tapes and disks\": \"7722\",\r\n  \"Renting and leasing of other personal and household goods\": \"7729\",\r\n  \"Renting and leasing of other machinery, equipment and tangible goods\": \"7730\",\r\n  \"Leasing of intellectual property and similar products, except copyrighted works\": \"7740\",\r\n  \"Activities of employment placement agencies\": \"7810\",\r\n  \"Temporary employment agency activities\": \"7820\",\r\n  \"Other human resources provision\": \"7830\",\r\n  \"Travel agency activities\": \"7911\",\r\n  \"Tour operator activities\": \"7912\",\r\n  \"Other reservation service and related activities\": \"7990\",\r\n  \"Private security activities\": \"8010\",\r\n  \"Security systems service activities\": \"8020\",\r\n  \"Investigation activities\": \"8030\",\r\n  \"Combined facilities support activities\": \"8110\",\r\n  \"General cleaning of buildings\": \"8121\",\r\n  \"Other building and industrial cleaning activities\": \"8129\",\r\n  \"Landscape care and maintenance service activities\": \"8130\",\r\n  \"Combined office administrative service activities\": \"8211\",\r\n  \"Photocopying, document preparation and other specialized office support activities\": \"8219\",\r\n  \"Activities of call centres\": \"8220\",\r\n  \"Organization of conventions and trade shows\": \"8230\",\r\n  \"Activities of collection agencies and credit bureaus\": \"8291\",\r\n  \"Packaging activities\": \"8292\",\r\n  \"Other business support service activities n.e.c.\": \"8299\",\r\n  \"General public administration activities\": \"8411\",\r\n  \"Regulation of the activities of providing health care, education, cultural services and other social services, excluding social security\": \"8412\",\r\n  \"Regulation of and contribution to more efficient operation of businesses\": \"8413\",\r\n  \"Foreign affairs\": \"8421\",\r\n  \"Defence activities\": \"8422\",\r\n  \"Public order and safety activities\": \"8423\",\r\n  \"Compulsory social security activities\": \"8430\",\r\n  \"Pre-primary and primary education\": \"8510\",\r\n  \"General secondary education\": \"8521\",\r\n  \"Technical and vocational secondary education\": \"8522\",\r\n  \"Higher education\": \"8530\",\r\n  \"Sports and recreation education\": \"8541\",\r\n  \"Cultural education\": \"8542\",\r\n  \"Other education n.e.c.\": \"8549\",\r\n  \"Educational support activities\": \"8550\",\r\n  \"Hospital activities\": \"8610\",\r\n  \"Medical and dental practice activities\": \"8620\",\r\n  \"Other human health activities\": \"8690\",\r\n  \"Residential nursing care facilities\": \"8710\",\r\n  \"Residential care activities for mental retardation, mental health and substance abuse\": \"8720\",\r\n  \"Residential care activities for the elderly and disabled\": \"8730\",\r\n  \"Other residential care activities\": \"8790\",\r\n  \"Social work activities without accommodation for the elderly and disabled\": \"8810\",\r\n  \"Other social work activities without accommodation\": \"8890\",\r\n  \"Creative, arts and entertainment activities\": \"9000\",\r\n  \"Library and archives activities\": \"9101\",\r\n  \"Museums activities and operation of historical sites and buildings\": \"9102\",\r\n  \"Botanical and zoological gardens and nature reserves activities\": \"9103\",\r\n  \"Gambling and betting activities\": \"9200\",\r\n  \"Operation of sports facilities\": \"9311\",\r\n  \"Activities of sports clubs\": \"9312\",\r\n  \"Other sports activities\": \"9319\",\r\n  \"Activities of amusement parks and theme parks\": \"9321\",\r\n  \"Other amusement and recreation activities n.e.c.\": \"9329\",\r\n  \"Activities of business and employers membership organizations\": \"9411\",\r\n  \"Activities of professional membership organizations\": \"9412\",\r\n  \"Activities of trade unions\": \"9420\",\r\n  \"Activities of religious organizations\": \"9491\",\r\n  \"Activities of political organizations\": \"9492\",\r\n  \"Activities of other membership organizations n.e.c.\": \"9499\",\r\n  \"Repair of computers and peripheral equipment\": \"9511\",\r\n  \"Repair of communication equipment\": \"9512\",\r\n  \"Repair of consumer electronics\": \"9521\",\r\n  \"Repair of household appliances and home and garden equipment\": \"9522\",\r\n  \"Repair of footwear and leather goods\": \"9523\",\r\n  \"Repair of furniture and home furnishings\": \"9524\",\r\n  \"Repair of other personal and household goods\": \"9529\",\r\n  \"Washing and (dry-) cleaning of textile and fur products\": \"9601\",\r\n  \"Hairdressing and other beauty treatment\": \"9602\",\r\n  \"Funeral and related activities\": \"9603\",\r\n  \"Other personal service activities n.e.c.\": \"9609\",\r\n  \"Activities of households as employers of domestic personnel\": \"9700\",\r\n  \"Undifferentiated goods-producing activities of private households for own use\": \"9810\",\r\n  \"Undifferentiated service-producing activities of private households for own use\": \"9820\",\r\n  \"Activities of extraterritorial organizations and bodies\": \"9900\"\r\n}",
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~3767776"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1353,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1352,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/ISIC+Industry_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ISIC+Industry_Class+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3767776,
      "name": "OpenCorporates+Industry Class",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+Industry_Class.json",
      "designer": "OpenCorporates",
      "title": "Industry Class",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": "{\r\n  \"Growing of cereals (except rice), leguminous crops and oil seeds\": \"0111\",\r\n  \"Growing of rice\": \"0112\",\r\n  \"Growing of vegetables and melons, roots and tubers\": \"0113\",\r\n  \"Growing of sugar cane\": \"0114\",\r\n  \"Growing of tobacco\": \"0115\",\r\n  \"Growing of fibre crops\": \"0116\",\r\n  \"Growing of other non-perennial crops\": \"0119\",\r\n  \"Growing of grapes\": \"0121\",\r\n  \"Growing of tropical and subtropical fruits\": \"0122\",\r\n  \"Growing of citrus fruits\": \"0123\",\r\n  \"Growing of pome fruits and stone fruits\": \"0124\",\r\n  \"Growing of other tree and bush fruits and nuts\": \"0125\",\r\n  \"Growing of oleaginous fruits\": \"0126\",\r\n  \"Growing of beverage crops\": \"0127\",\r\n  \"Growing of spices, aromatic, drug and pharmaceutical crops\": \"0128\",\r\n  \"Growing of other perennial crops\": \"0129\",\r\n  \"Plant propagation\": \"0130\",\r\n  \"Raising of cattle and buffaloes\": \"0141\",\r\n  \"Raising of horses and other equines\": \"0142\",\r\n  \"Raising of camels and camelids\": \"0143\",\r\n  \"Raising of sheep and goats\": \"0144\",\r\n  \"Raising of swine/pigs\": \"0145\",\r\n  \"Raising of poultry\": \"0146\",\r\n  \"Raising of other animals\": \"0149\",\r\n  \"Mixed farming\": \"0150\",\r\n  \"Support activities for crop production\": \"0161\",\r\n  \"Support activities for animal production\": \"0162\",\r\n  \"Post-harvest crop activities\": \"0163\",\r\n  \"Seed processing for propagation\": \"0164\",\r\n  \"Hunting, trapping and related service activities\": \"0170\",\r\n  \"Silviculture and other forestry activities\": \"0210\",\r\n  \"Logging\": \"0220\",\r\n  \"Gathering of non-wood forest products\": \"0230\",\r\n  \"Support services to forestry\": \"0240\",\r\n  \"Marine fishing\": \"0311\",\r\n  \"Freshwater fishing\": \"0312\",\r\n  \"Marine aquaculture\": \"0321\",\r\n  \"Freshwater aquaculture\": \"0322\",\r\n  \"Mining of hard coal\": \"0510\",\r\n  \"Mining of lignite\": \"0520\",\r\n  \"Extraction of crude petroleum\": \"0610\",\r\n  \"Extraction of natural gas\": \"0620\",\r\n  \"Mining of iron ores\": \"0710\",\r\n  \"Mining of uranium and thorium ores\": \"0721\",\r\n  \"Mining of other non-ferrous metal ores\": \"0729\",\r\n  \"Quarrying of stone, sand and clay\": \"0810\",\r\n  \"Mining of chemical and fertilizer minerals\": \"0891\",\r\n  \"Extraction of peat\": \"0892\",\r\n  \"Extraction of salt\": \"0893\",\r\n  \"Other mining and quarrying n.e.c.\": \"0899\",\r\n  \"Support activities for petroleum and natural gas extraction\": \"0910\",\r\n  \"Support activities for other mining and quarrying\": \"0990\",\r\n  \"Processing and preserving of meat\": \"1010\",\r\n  \"Processing and preserving of fish, crustaceans and molluscs\": \"1020\",\r\n  \"Processing and preserving of fruit and vegetables\": \"1030\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of vegetable and animal oils and fats\": \"1040\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of dairy products\": \"1050\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of grain mill products\": \"1061\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of starches and starch products\": \"1062\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of bakery products\": \"1071\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of sugar\": \"1072\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of cocoa, chocolate and sugar confectionery\": \"1073\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of macaroni, noodles, couscous and similar farinaceous products\": \"1074\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of prepared meals and dishes\": \"1075\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other food products n.e.c.\": \"1079\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of prepared animal feeds\": \"1080\",\r\n  \"Distilling, rectifying and blending of spirits\": \"1101\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of wines\": \"1102\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of malt liquors and malt\": \"1103\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of soft drinks;  production of mineral waters and other bottled waters\": \"1104\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of tobacco products\": \"1200\",\r\n  \"Preparation and spinning of textile fibres\": \"1311\",\r\n  \"Weaving of textiles\": \"1312\",\r\n  \"Finishing of textiles\": \"1313\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of knitted and crocheted fabrics\": \"1391\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of made-up textile articles, except apparel\": \"1392\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of carpets and rugs\": \"1393\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of cordage, rope, twine and netting\": \"1394\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other textiles n.e.c.\": \"1399\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of wearing apparel, except fur apparel\": \"1410\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of articles of fur\": \"1420\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of knitted and crocheted apparel\": \"1430\",\r\n  \"Tanning and dressing of leather; dressing and dyeing of fur\": \"1511\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of luggage, handbags and the like, saddlery and harness\": \"1512\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of footwear\": \"1520\",\r\n  \"Sawmilling and planing of wood\": \"1610\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of veneer sheets and wood-based panels\": \"1621\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of builders carpentry and joinery\": \"1622\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of wooden containers\": \"1623\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other products of wood; manufacture of articles of cork, straw and plaiting materials\": \"1629\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of pulp, paper and paperboard\": \"1701\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of corrugated paper and paperboard and of containers of paper and paperboard\": \"1702\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other articles of paper and paperboard\": \"1709\",\r\n  \"Printing\": \"1811\",\r\n  \"Service activities related to printing\": \"1812\",\r\n  \"Reproduction of recorded media\": \"1820\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of coke oven products\": \"1910\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of refined petroleum products\": \"1920\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of basic chemicals\": \"2011\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of fertilizers and nitrogen compounds\": \"2012\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of plastics and synthetic rubber in primary forms\": \"2013\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of pesticides and other agrochemical products\": \"2021\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of paints, varnishes and similar coatings, printing ink and mastics\": \"2022\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of soap and detergents, cleaning and polishing preparations, perfumes and toilet preparations\": \"2023\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other chemical products n.e.c.\": \"2029\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of man-made fibres\": \"2030\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of pharmaceuticals, medicinal chemical and botanical products\": \"2100\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of rubber tyres and tubes; retreading and rebuilding of rubber tyres\": \"2211\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other rubber products\": \"2219\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of plastics products\": \"2220\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of glass and glass products\": \"2310\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of refractory products\": \"2391\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of clay building materials\": \"2392\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other porcelain and ceramic products\": \"2393\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of cement, lime and plaster\": \"2394\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of articles of concrete, cement and plaster\": \"2395\",\r\n  \"Cutting, shaping and finishing of stone\": \"2396\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products n.e.c.\": \"2399\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of basic iron and steel\": \"2410\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of basic precious and other non-ferrous metals\": \"2420\",\r\n  \"Casting of iron and steel\": \"2431\",\r\n  \"Casting of non-ferrous metals\": \"2432\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of structural metal products\": \"2511\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of tanks, reservoirs and containers of metal\": \"2512\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of steam generators, except central heating hot water boilers\": \"2513\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of weapons and ammunition\": \"2520\",\r\n  \"Forging, pressing, stamping and roll-forming of metal\": \"2591\",\r\n  \"Treatment and coating of metals\": \"2592\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of cutlery, hand tools and general hardware\": \"2593\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other fabricated metal products n.e.c.\": \"2599\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of electronic components and boards\": \"2610\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of computers and peripheral equipment\": \"2620\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of communication equipment\": \"2630\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of consumer electronics\": \"2640\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of measuring, testing, navigating and control equipment\": \"2651\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of watches and clocks\": \"2652\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of irradiation, electromedical and electrotherapeutic equipment\": \"2660\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of optical instruments and photographic equipment\": \"2670\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of magnetic and optical media\": \"2680\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of electric motors, generators, transformers and electricity distribution and control apparatus\": \"2710\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of batteries and accumulators\": \"2720\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of fibre optic cables\": \"2731\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other electronic and electric wires and cables\": \"2732\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of wiring devices\": \"2733\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of electric lighting equipment\": \"2740\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of domestic appliances\": \"2750\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other electrical equipment\": \"2790\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of engines and turbines, except aircraft, vehicle and cycle engines\": \"2811\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of fluid power equipment\": \"2812\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other pumps, compressors, taps and valves\": \"2813\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of bearings, gears, gearing and driving elements\": \"2814\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of ovens, furnaces and furnace burners\": \"2815\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of lifting and handling equipment\": \"2816\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of office machinery and equipment (except computers and peripheral equipment)\": \"2817\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of power-driven hand tools\": \"2818\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other general-purpose machinery\": \"2819\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of agricultural and forestry machinery\": \"2821\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of metal-forming machinery and machine tools\": \"2822\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of machinery for metallurgy\": \"2823\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of machinery for mining, quarrying and construction\": \"2824\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of machinery for food, beverage and tobacco processing\": \"2825\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of machinery for textile, apparel and leather production\": \"2826\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other special-purpose machinery\": \"2829\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of motor vehicles\": \"2910\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of bodies (coachwork) for motor vehicles\": \"2920\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of parts and accessories for motor vehicles\": \"2930\",\r\n  \"Building of ships and floating structures\": \"3011\",\r\n  \"Building of pleasure and sporting boats\": \"3012\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of railway locomotives and rolling stock\": \"3020\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of air and spacecraft and related machinery\": \"3030\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of military fighting vehicles\": \"3040\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of motorcycles\": \"3091\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of bicycles and invalid carriages\": \"3092\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of other transport equipment n.e.c.\": \"3099\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of furniture\": \"3100\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of jewellery and related articles\": \"3211\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of imitation jewellery and related articles\": \"3212\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of musical instruments\": \"3220\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of sports goods\": \"3230\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of games and toys\": \"3240\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of medical and dental instruments and supplies\": \"3250\",\r\n  \"Other manufacturing n.e.c.\": \"3290\",\r\n  \"Repair of fabricated metal products\": \"3311\",\r\n  \"Repair of machinery\": \"3312\",\r\n  \"Repair of electronic and optical equipment\": \"3313\",\r\n  \"Repair of electrical equipment\": \"3314\",\r\n  \"Repair of transport equipment, except motor vehicles\": \"3315\",\r\n  \"Repair of other equipment\": \"3319\",\r\n  \"Installation of industrial machinery and equipment\": \"3320\",\r\n  \"Electric power generation, transmission and distribution\": \"3510\",\r\n  \"Manufacture of gas\": \"3520\",\r\n  \"Steam and air conditioning supply\": \"3530\",\r\n  \"Water collection, treatment and supply\": \"3600\",\r\n  \"Sewerage\": \"3700\",\r\n  \"Collection of non-hazardous waste\": \"3811\",\r\n  \"Collection of hazardous waste\": \"3812\",\r\n  \"Treatment and disposal of non-hazardous waste\": \"3821\",\r\n  \"Treatment and disposal of hazardous waste\": \"3822\",\r\n  \"Materials recovery\": \"3830\",\r\n  \"Remediation activities and other waste management services\": \"3900\",\r\n  \"Construction of buildings\": \"4100\",\r\n  \"Construction of roads and railways\": \"4210\",\r\n  \"Construction of utility projects\": \"4220\",\r\n  \"Construction of other civil engineering projects\": \"4290\",\r\n  \"Demolition\": \"4311\",\r\n  \"Site preparation\": \"4312\",\r\n  \"Electrical installation\": \"4321\",\r\n  \"Plumbing, heat and air-conditioning installation\": \"4322\",\r\n  \"Other construction installation\": \"4329\",\r\n  \"Building completion and finishing\": \"4330\",\r\n  \"Other specialized construction activities\": \"4390\",\r\n  \"Sale of motor vehicles\": \"4510\",\r\n  \"Maintenance and repair of motor vehicles\": \"4520\",\r\n  \"Sale of motor vehicle parts and accessories\": \"4530\",\r\n  \"Sale, maintenance and repair of motorcycles and related parts and accessories\": \"4540\",\r\n  \"Wholesale on a fee or contract basis\": \"4610\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of agricultural raw materials and live animals\": \"4620\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of food, beverages and tobacco\": \"4630\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of textiles, clothing and footwear\": \"4641\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of other household goods\": \"4649\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of computers, computer peripheral equipment and software\": \"4651\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of electronic and telecommunications equipment and parts\": \"4652\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of agricultural machinery, equipment and supplies\": \"4653\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of other machinery and equipment\": \"4659\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels and related products\": \"4661\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of metals and metal ores\": \"4662\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of construction materials, hardware, plumbing and heating equipment and supplies\": \"4663\",\r\n  \"Wholesale of waste and scrap and other products n.e.c.\": \"4669\",\r\n  \"Non-specialized wholesale trade\": \"4690\",\r\n  \"Retail sale in non-specialized stores with food, beverages or tobacco predominating\": \"4711\",\r\n  \"Other retail sale in non-specialized stores\": \"4719\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of food in specialized stores\": \"4721\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of beverages in specialized stores\": \"4722\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of tobacco products in specialized stores\": \"4723\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of automotive fuel in specialized stores\": \"4730\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of computers, peripheral units, software and telecommunications equipment in specialized stores\": \"4741\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of audio and video equipment in specialized stores\": \"4742\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of textiles in specialized stores\": \"4751\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of hardware, paints and glass in specialized stores\": \"4752\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of carpets, rugs, wall and floor coverings in specialized stores\": \"4753\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of electrical household appliances, furniture, lighting equipment and other household articles in specialized stores\": \"4759\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of books, newspapers and stationary in specialized stores\": \"4761\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of music and video recordings in specialized stores\": \"4762\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of sporting equipment in specialized stores\": \"4763\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of games and toys in specialized stores\": \"4764\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of clothing, footwear and leather articles in specialized stores\": \"4771\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of pharmaceutical and medical goods, cosmetic and toilet articles in specialized stores\": \"4772\",\r\n  \"Other retail sale of new goods in specialized stores\": \"4773\",\r\n  \"Retail sale of second-hand goods\": \"4774\",\r\n  \"Retail sale via stalls and markets of food, beverages and tobacco products\": \"4781\",\r\n  \"Retail sale via stalls and markets of textiles, clothing and footwear\": \"4782\",\r\n  \"Retail sale via stalls and markets of other goods\": \"4789\",\r\n  \"Retail sale via mail order houses or via Internet\": \"4791\",\r\n  \"Other retail sale not in stores, stalls or markets\": \"4799\",\r\n  \"Passenger rail transport, interurban\": \"4911\",\r\n  \"Freight rail transport\": \"4912\",\r\n  \"Urban and suburban passenger land transport\": \"4921\",\r\n  \"Other passenger land transport\": \"4922\",\r\n  \"Freight transport by road\": \"4923\",\r\n  \"Transport via pipeline\": \"4930\",\r\n  \"Sea and coastal passenger water transport\": \"5011\",\r\n  \"Sea and coastal freight water transport\": \"5012\",\r\n  \"Inland passenger water transport\": \"5021\",\r\n  \"Inland freight water transport\": \"5022\",\r\n  \"Passenger air transport\": \"5110\",\r\n  \"Freight air transport\": \"5120\",\r\n  \"Warehousing and storage\": \"5210\",\r\n  \"Service activities incidental to land transportation\": \"5221\",\r\n  \"Service activities incidental to water transportation\": \"5222\",\r\n  \"Service activities incidental to air transportation\": \"5223\",\r\n  \"Cargo handling\": \"5224\",\r\n  \"Other transportation support activities\": \"5229\",\r\n  \"Postal activities\": \"5310\",\r\n  \"Courier activities\": \"5320\",\r\n  \"Short term accommodation activities\": \"5510\",\r\n  \"Camping grounds, recreational vehicle parks and trailer parks\": \"5520\",\r\n  \"Other accommodation\": \"5590\",\r\n  \"Restaurants and mobile food service activities\": \"5610\",\r\n  \"Event catering\": \"5621\",\r\n  \"Other food service activities\": \"5629\",\r\n  \"Beverage serving activities\": \"5630\",\r\n  \"Book publishing\": \"5811\",\r\n  \"Publishing of directories and mailing lists\": \"5812\",\r\n  \"Publishing of newspapers, journals and periodicals\": \"5813\",\r\n  \"Other publishing activities\": \"5819\",\r\n  \"Software publishing\": \"5820\",\r\n  \"Motion picture, video and television programme production activities\": \"5911\",\r\n  \"Motion picture, video and television programme post-production activities\": \"5912\",\r\n  \"Motion picture, video and television programme distribution activities\": \"5913\",\r\n  \"Motion picture projection activities\": \"5914\",\r\n  \"Sound recording and music publishing activities\": \"5920\",\r\n  \"Radio broadcasting\": \"6010\",\r\n  \"Television programming and broadcasting activities\": \"6020\",\r\n  \"Wired telecommunications activities\": \"6110\",\r\n  \"Wireless telecommunications activities\": \"6120\",\r\n  \"Satellite telecommunications activities\": \"6130\",\r\n  \"Other telecommunications activities\": \"6190\",\r\n  \"Computer programming activities\": \"6201\",\r\n  \"Computer consultancy and computer facilities management activities\": \"6202\",\r\n  \"Other information technology and computer service activities\": \"6209\",\r\n  \"Data processing, hosting and related activities\": \"6311\",\r\n  \"Web portals\": \"6312\",\r\n  \"News agency activities\": \"6391\",\r\n  \"Other information service activities n.e.c.\": \"6399\",\r\n  \"Central banking\": \"6411\",\r\n  \"Other monetary intermediation\": \"6419\",\r\n  \"Activities of holding companies\": \"6420\",\r\n  \"Trusts, funds and similar financial entities\": \"6430\",\r\n  \"Financial leasing\": \"6491\",\r\n  \"Other credit granting\": \"6492\",\r\n  \"Other financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding activities, n.e.c.\": \"6499\",\r\n  \"Life insurance\": \"6511\",\r\n  \"Non-life insurance\": \"6512\",\r\n  \"Reinsurance\": \"6520\",\r\n  \"Pension funding\": \"6530\",\r\n  \"Administration of financial markets\": \"6611\",\r\n  \"Security and commodity contracts brokerage\": \"6612\",\r\n  \"Other activities auxiliary to financial service activities\": \"6619\",\r\n  \"Risk and damage evaluation\": \"6621\",\r\n  \"Activities of insurance agents and brokers\": \"6622\",\r\n  \"Other activities auxiliary to insurance and pension funding\": \"6629\",\r\n  \"Fund management activities\": \"6630\",\r\n  \"Real estate activities with own or leased property\": \"6810\",\r\n  \"Real estate activities on a fee or contract basis\": \"6820\",\r\n  \"Legal activities\": \"6910\",\r\n  \"Accounting, bookkeeping and auditing activities\": \"6920\",\r\n  \"Activities of head offices\": \"7010\",\r\n  \"Management consultancy activities\": \"7020\",\r\n  \"Architectural and engineering activities and related technical consultancy\": \"7110\",\r\n  \"Technical testing and analysis\": \"7120\",\r\n  \"Research and experimental development on natural sciences and engineering\": \"7210\",\r\n  \"Research and experimental development on social sciences and humanities\": \"7220\",\r\n  \"Advertising\": \"7310\",\r\n  \"Market research and public opinion polling\": \"7320\",\r\n  \"Specialized design activities\": \"7410\",\r\n  \"Photographic activities\": \"7420\",\r\n  \"Other professional, scientific and technical activities n.e.c.\": \"7490\",\r\n  \"Veterinary activities\": \"7500\",\r\n  \"Renting and leasing of motor vehicles\": \"7710\",\r\n  \"Renting and leasing of recreational and sports goods\": \"7721\",\r\n  \"Renting of video tapes and disks\": \"7722\",\r\n  \"Renting and leasing of other personal and household goods\": \"7729\",\r\n  \"Renting and leasing of other machinery, equipment and tangible goods\": \"7730\",\r\n  \"Leasing of intellectual property and similar products, except copyrighted works\": \"7740\",\r\n  \"Activities of employment placement agencies\": \"7810\",\r\n  \"Temporary employment agency activities\": \"7820\",\r\n  \"Other human resources provision\": \"7830\",\r\n  \"Travel agency activities\": \"7911\",\r\n  \"Tour operator activities\": \"7912\",\r\n  \"Other reservation service and related activities\": \"7990\",\r\n  \"Private security activities\": \"8010\",\r\n  \"Security systems service activities\": \"8020\",\r\n  \"Investigation activities\": \"8030\",\r\n  \"Combined facilities support activities\": \"8110\",\r\n  \"General cleaning of buildings\": \"8121\",\r\n  \"Other building and industrial cleaning activities\": \"8129\",\r\n  \"Landscape care and maintenance service activities\": \"8130\",\r\n  \"Combined office administrative service activities\": \"8211\",\r\n  \"Photocopying, document preparation and other specialized office support activities\": \"8219\",\r\n  \"Activities of call centres\": \"8220\",\r\n  \"Organization of conventions and trade shows\": \"8230\",\r\n  \"Activities of collection agencies and credit bureaus\": \"8291\",\r\n  \"Packaging activities\": \"8292\",\r\n  \"Other business support service activities n.e.c.\": \"8299\",\r\n  \"General public administration activities\": \"8411\",\r\n  \"Regulation of the activities of providing health care, education, cultural services and other social services, excluding social security\": \"8412\",\r\n  \"Regulation of and contribution to more efficient operation of businesses\": \"8413\",\r\n  \"Foreign affairs\": \"8421\",\r\n  \"Defence activities\": \"8422\",\r\n  \"Public order and safety activities\": \"8423\",\r\n  \"Compulsory social security activities\": \"8430\",\r\n  \"Pre-primary and primary education\": \"8510\",\r\n  \"General secondary education\": \"8521\",\r\n  \"Technical and vocational secondary education\": \"8522\",\r\n  \"Higher education\": \"8530\",\r\n  \"Sports and recreation education\": \"8541\",\r\n  \"Cultural education\": \"8542\",\r\n  \"Other education n.e.c.\": \"8549\",\r\n  \"Educational support activities\": \"8550\",\r\n  \"Hospital activities\": \"8610\",\r\n  \"Medical and dental practice activities\": \"8620\",\r\n  \"Other human health activities\": \"8690\",\r\n  \"Residential nursing care facilities\": \"8710\",\r\n  \"Residential care activities for mental retardation, mental health and substance abuse\": \"8720\",\r\n  \"Residential care activities for the elderly and disabled\": \"8730\",\r\n  \"Other residential care activities\": \"8790\",\r\n  \"Social work activities without accommodation for the elderly and disabled\": \"8810\",\r\n  \"Other social work activities without accommodation\": \"8890\",\r\n  \"Creative, arts and entertainment activities\": \"9000\",\r\n  \"Library and archives activities\": \"9101\",\r\n  \"Museums activities and operation of historical sites and buildings\": \"9102\",\r\n  \"Botanical and zoological gardens and nature reserves activities\": \"9103\",\r\n  \"Gambling and betting activities\": \"9200\",\r\n  \"Operation of sports facilities\": \"9311\",\r\n  \"Activities of sports clubs\": \"9312\",\r\n  \"Other sports activities\": \"9319\",\r\n  \"Activities of amusement parks and theme parks\": \"9321\",\r\n  \"Other amusement and recreation activities n.e.c.\": \"9329\",\r\n  \"Activities of business and employers membership organizations\": \"9411\",\r\n  \"Activities of professional membership organizations\": \"9412\",\r\n  \"Activities of trade unions\": \"9420\",\r\n  \"Activities of religious organizations\": \"9491\",\r\n  \"Activities of political organizations\": \"9492\",\r\n  \"Activities of other membership organizations n.e.c.\": \"9499\",\r\n  \"Repair of computers and peripheral equipment\": \"9511\",\r\n  \"Repair of communication equipment\": \"9512\",\r\n  \"Repair of consumer electronics\": \"9521\",\r\n  \"Repair of household appliances and home and garden equipment\": \"9522\",\r\n  \"Repair of footwear and leather goods\": \"9523\",\r\n  \"Repair of furniture and home furnishings\": \"9524\",\r\n  \"Repair of other personal and household goods\": \"9529\",\r\n  \"Washing and (dry-) cleaning of textile and fur products\": \"9601\",\r\n  \"Hairdressing and other beauty treatment\": \"9602\",\r\n  \"Funeral and related activities\": \"9603\",\r\n  \"Other personal service activities n.e.c.\": \"9609\",\r\n  \"Activities of households as employers of domestic personnel\": \"9700\",\r\n  \"Undifferentiated goods-producing activities of private households for own use\": \"9810\",\r\n  \"Undifferentiated service-producing activities of private households for own use\": \"9820\",\r\n  \"Activities of extraterritorial organizations and bodies\": \"9900\"\r\n}",
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1352,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1351,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/ISIC+Industry_Class.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/OpenCorporates+Industry_Class+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 3832331,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+Yearly change in female workers/managers differential",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Yearly_change_in_female_workers_managers_differential.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "Yearly change in female workers/managers differential",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 - m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~2933763"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~2933763",
          "year": "-1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1010,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 401,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Yearly_change_in_female_workers_managers_differential+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4015884,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Collective bargaining (GRI 102-41)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Collective_bargaining_GRI_102_41.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Collective bargaining (GRI 102-41)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of total employees covered by collective bargaining agreements?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": "<p>GRI 102: General Disclosures, which includes <em>102-41 Collective Bargaining</em>, sets out reporting requirements on contextual information about an organization and its sustainability reporting practices. This Standard can be used by an organization of any size, type, sector or geographic location.</p>\r\n<p>This disclosure (102-41) asks for the percentage of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements. It does not ask for the percentage of employees belonging to trade unions.</p>\r\n<p>Collective bargaining refers to all negotiations which take place between one or more employers or employers' organizations, on the one hand, and one or more workers' organizations (trade unions), on the other, for determining working conditions and terms of employment or for regulating relations between employers and workers. Therefore, a collective bargaining agreement represents a form of joint decision-making concerning the organization’s operations.</p>\r\n<p>By definition, collective bargaining agreements are obligations (often legally binding) that the organization has undertaken. The organization is expected to understand the coverage of the agreement (the workers to whom it is obligated to apply the terms of the agreement).</p>\r\n<p>Collective agreements can be made at various levels and for categories and groups of workers. Collective agreements can be at the level of the organization; at the industry level, in countries where that is the practice; or at both. Collective agreements can cover specific groups of workers; for example, those performing a specific activity or working at a specific location.</p>\r\n<p>See full background <a href=\"/Source_000088315\">here</a>.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">How to research answer:</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Look into annual and sustainability reports to find the answer to this metric question. Keyword search using the GRI code (GRI 102-41) and words like Collective and Bargaining. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company reports the number of employees covered, you will need to calculate the percentage to fit to this question.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Use the <em>comments</em> field to <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">include additional details</span>, such as where you found the information (<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span>), quotes from the source cited, and any conversions or calculations done. For this metric, GRI requires the reporting organization to report the information: <em>The basis for identifying and selecting stakeholders with whom to engage</em>. If found, this can also be added to the comments field.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~813500"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3270,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 1319,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Collective_bargaining_GRI_102_41+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4016739,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Water Volume Recycled (GRI 303-3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Water_Volume_Recycled_GRI_303_3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Water Volume Recycled (GRI 303-3)",
      "question": "What volume of the water used by the company was recycled or reused (in cubic metres)?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "cubic metres",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~1821705"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2276,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 807,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Water_Volume_Recycled_GRI_303_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4017516,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Water Recycled (%) (GRI 303-3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Water_Recycled_GRI_303_3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Water Recycled (%) (GRI 303-3)",
      "question": "What percentage of water used by the company was recycled or reused?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~801317"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2136,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 891,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Water_Recycled_GRI_303_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4049102,
      "name": "Commons+Shareholder Of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Shareholder_Of.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Shareholder Of",
      "question": "What companies does this company have shares in, and what percentage of shares does it hold?",
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 854,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 581,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Industry.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Greenhouse_gas_disclosure_rate_of_investees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Shareholder_Of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4049109,
      "name": "Commons+has Shareholder",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+has_Shareholder.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "has Shareholder",
      "question": "Which companies have shares in this company?",
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 320,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 123,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Shareholder_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_shareholders_WDI_signatory.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+has_Shareholder+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4061542,
      "name": "Climate Action 100 Plus+Investor Signatories",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Climate_Action_100_Plus+Investor_Signatories.json",
      "designer": "Climate Action 100 Plus",
      "title": "Investor Signatories",
      "question": "Has this investor organization signed the \"Climate Action 100+ Sign-on Statement\" that sets out investor signatories’ commitment and expectations of the companies on the initiative’s focus list?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><a href=\"https://www.climateaction100.org/\">Climate Action 100+</a> requires investors to sign on to the <strong>Climate Action 100+ Sign-on Statement</strong> that sets out the investor signatories’ commitment and expectations of the companies on the initiative’s focus list. To date, it has been signed by <strong>310 investors from across dozens of countries, who collectively manage more than USD $32 trillion in assets under management</strong>.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">See the Climate Action 100+ website to determine whether an investment company is a signatory to the initiative: <a href=\"https://climateaction100.wordpress.com/investors/\">https://www.climateaction100.org/whos-involved/investors/</a></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Responsible Investment Transparency Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 108,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 108,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Climate_Action_100_Plus+Investor_Signatories+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4316191,
      "name": "Commons+uses Tin smelted by",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+uses_Tin_smelted_by.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "uses Tin smelted by",
      "question": "Which companies supply Tin to this company?",
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 392,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 221,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Discloses_Smelters_and_Refiners.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+uses_Tin_smelted_by+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4316413,
      "name": "Commons+is Tin supplier of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+is_Tin_supplier_of.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "is Tin supplier of",
      "question": "Which companies source Tin from this smelter/refiner?",
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3657,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1785,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Industry.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+is_Tin_supplier_of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4316768,
      "name": "Commons+uses Tantalum smelted by",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+uses_Tantalum_smelted_by.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "uses Tantalum smelted by",
      "question": "Which companies supply Tantalum to this company?",
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 361,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 199,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Discloses_Smelters_and_Refiners.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+uses_Tantalum_smelted_by+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4316776,
      "name": "Commons+is Tantalum supplier of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+is_Tantalum_supplier_of.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "is Tantalum supplier of",
      "question": "Which companies source Tantalum from this smelter/refiner?",
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 863,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 378,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Industry.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+is_Tantalum_supplier_of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4316889,
      "name": "Commons+uses Tungsten smelted by",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+uses_Tungsten_smelted_by.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "uses Tungsten smelted by",
      "question": "Which companies supply Tungsten to this company?",
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 359,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 199,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Discloses_Smelters_and_Refiners.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+uses_Tungsten_smelted_by+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4316896,
      "name": "Commons+is Tungsten supplier of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+is_Tungsten_supplier_of.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "is Tungsten supplier of",
      "question": "Which companies source Tungsten from this smelter/refiner?",
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1040,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 466,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Industry.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+is_Tungsten_supplier_of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4572894,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Total energy consumption, GRI 302-1-e (formerly G4-EN3-e)+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_energy_consumption_GRI_302_1_e_formerly_G4_EN3_e+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Total energy consumption, GRI 302-1-e (formerly G4-EN3-e)",
      "question": "Did the company disclose what its total energy consumption (in gigajoules) is?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (isKnown(answer)) {\n    10;\n  } else {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3905,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1355,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Disclosure_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_energy_consumption_GRI_302_1_e_formerly_G4_EN3_e+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4574021,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Sustainable Sourcing Procedures+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Sustainable_Sourcing_Procedures+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Sustainable Sourcing Procedures",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Performance_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Sustainable_Sourcing_Procedures+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4574033,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Local SME Production+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Local_SME_Production+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Local SME Production",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Performance_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Local_SME_Production+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4574040,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Recycling Products+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Recycling_Products+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Recycling Products",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Performance_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Recycling_Products+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4574047,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Recycling Waste+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Recycling_Waste+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Recycling Waste",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Performance_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Recycling_Waste+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4574054,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+NVG Principle 6 Policy Applicable Beyond Own Operations+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+NVG_Principle_6_Policy_Applicable_Beyond_Own_Operations+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "NVG Principle 6 Policy Applicable Beyond Own Operations",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Performance_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+NVG_Principle_6_Policy_Applicable_Beyond_Own_Operations+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4574138,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Addressing Global Environmental Issues+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Addressing_Global_Environmental_Issues+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Addressing Global Environmental Issues",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Performance_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Addressing_Global_Environmental_Issues+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4574209,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Identifies Environmental Risks+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Identifies_Environmental_Risks+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Identifies Environmental Risks",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Performance_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Identifies_Environmental_Risks+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4574222,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Assesses Environmental Risks+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Assesses_Environmental_Risks+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Assesses Environmental Risks",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Performance_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Assesses_Environmental_Risks+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4574233,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Clean Development Mechanism Project(s)+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Clean_Development_Mechanism_Project_s+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Clean Development Mechanism Project(s)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Performance_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Clean_Development_Mechanism_Project_s+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4574240,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Additional Environmental Initiatives+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Additional_Environmental_Initiatives+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Additional Environmental Initiatives",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Performance_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Additional_Environmental_Initiatives+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4574247,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Emission Reported+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Emission_Reported+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Emission Reported",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Performance_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Emission_Reported+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4574254,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+CPCB / SPCB Limits Disclosure (Emissions)+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+CPCB_SPCB_Limits_Disclosure_Emissions+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "CPCB / SPCB Limits Disclosure (Emissions)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Performance_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+CPCB_SPCB_Limits_Disclosure_Emissions+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4574262,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+Waste Reported+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Waste_Reported+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "Waste Reported",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Performance_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+Waste_Reported+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4574269,
      "name": "National Voluntary Guidelines+CPCB / SPCB Limits Disclosure (Waste)+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+CPCB_SPCB_Limits_Disclosure_Waste+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "National Voluntary Guidelines",
      "title": "CPCB / SPCB Limits Disclosure (Waste)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Performance_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/National_Voluntary_Guidelines+CPCB_SPCB_Limits_Disclosure_Waste+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4574283,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Fuel consumption from non-renewable sources, GRI 302-1-a (formerly G4-EN3-a)+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Fuel_consumption_from_non_renewable_sources_GRI_302_1_a_formerly_G4_EN3_a+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Fuel consumption from non-renewable sources, GRI 302-1-a (formerly G4-EN3-a)",
      "question": "Did the company disclose what their total amount of fuel consumption from non-renewable sources (in gigajoules) is?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (isKnown(answer)) {\n    10;\n  } else {\n    0;\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3769,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1319,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Disclosure_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Fuel_consumption_from_non_renewable_sources_GRI_302_1_a_formerly_G4_EN3_a+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4574925,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Fuel consumption from renewable sources, GRI 302-1-b (formerly G4-EN3-b)+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Fuel_consumption_from_renewable_sources_GRI_302_1_b_formerly_G4_EN3_b+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Fuel consumption from renewable sources, GRI 302-1-b (formerly G4-EN3-b)",
      "question": "Did the company disclose what their total amount of fuel consumption from renewable sources (in gigajoules) is?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (isKnown(answer)) {\n    10;\n  } else {\n    0;\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3725,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1333,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Disclosure_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Fuel_consumption_from_renewable_sources_GRI_302_1_b_formerly_G4_EN3_b+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4575565,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Reduction of energy consumption, GRI 302-4 (formerly G4-EN6)+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Reduction_of_energy_consumption_GRI_302_4_formerly_G4_EN6+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Reduction of energy consumption, GRI 302-4 (formerly G4-EN6)",
      "question": "Did the company disclose how much reduction in energy consumption (in gigajoules) it has achieved as a direct result of conservation and efficiency initiatives?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  ({\n    \"Unknown\": \"0\",\n    \"else\": \"10\"\n  });\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 824,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 431,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Disclosure_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Reduction_of_energy_consumption_GRI_302_4_formerly_G4_EN6+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4575897,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Total water withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_water_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Total water withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)",
      "question": "Did the company disclose how much water it withdrew (in cubic metres)?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (isKnown(answer)) {\n    10;\n  } else {\n    0;\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1147,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Disclosure_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_water_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4576573,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Third-party water withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Third_party_water_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Third-party water withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)",
      "question": "Did the company disclose how much water it used (in cubic metres) from municipal (public) sources?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (isKnown(answer)) {\n    10;\n  } else {\n    0;\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2216,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 929,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Disclosure_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Third_party_water_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4577062,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Groundwater withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Groundwater_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Groundwater withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)",
      "question": "Did the company disclose how much Ground Water it withdrew (in cubic metres)? ",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (isKnown(answer)) {\n    10;\n  } else {\n    0;\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2240,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 881,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Disclosure_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Groundwater_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4577388,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Surface water withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Surface_water_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Surface water withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a (formerly G4-EN8-a)",
      "question": "Did the company disclose how much Surface Water it withdrew (in cubic metres)?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  ({\n    \"Unknown\": \"0\",\n    \"else\": \"10\"\n  });\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1943,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 786,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Disclosure_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Surface_water_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a_formerly_G4_EN8_a+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4577687,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Waste Water Used (G4-EN8-a)+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Waste_Water_Used_G4_EN8_a+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Waste Water Used (G4-EN8-a)",
      "question": "Did the company disclose how much waste water (from another organization) it used (in cubic metres)? ",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (isKnown(answer)) {\n    10;\n  } else {\n    0;\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1870,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 793,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Disclosure_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Waste_Water_Used_G4_EN8_a+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4577999,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Rainwater collected directly and stored (G4-EN8-a)+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Rainwater_collected_directly_and_stored_G4_EN8_a+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Rainwater collected directly and stored (G4-EN8-a)",
      "question": "Did the company disclose how much rainwater it collected and stored (in cubic metres)? ",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (\"Unknown\") {\n    0;\n  } else {\n    10;\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1927,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 797,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Disclosure_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Rainwater_collected_directly_and_stored_G4_EN8_a+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4578309,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Environmental Fines, GRI 307-1 (formerly G4-EN29-a)+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Fines_GRI_307_1_formerly_G4_EN29_a+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Environmental Fines, GRI 307-1 (formerly G4-EN29-a)",
      "question": "Did the company disclose how much they were fined (in US dollars) for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reputational Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (isKnown(answer)) {\n    10;\n  } else {\n    0;\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3457,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1307,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Disclosure_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Fines_GRI_307_1_formerly_G4_EN29_a+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4579145,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Environmental Non-Monetary Sanctions GRI 307-1 (formerly G4-EN29-a)+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Non_Monetary_Sanctions_GRI_307_1_formerly_G4_EN29_a+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Environmental Non-Monetary Sanctions GRI 307-1 (formerly G4-EN29-a)",
      "question": "Did the company disclose how many non-monetary sanctions for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations it incurred? ",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (isKnown(answer)) {\n    10;\n  } else {\n    0;\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2183,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 900,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Disclosure_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Shibojyoti_Dutta+Environmental_Fines_per_Million_Direct_Economic_Value_Generated.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Non_Monetary_Sanctions_GRI_307_1_formerly_G4_EN29_a+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4579739,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Environmental Screening of New suppliers, GRI 308-1 (formerly G4-EN32)+Laureen van Breen",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Screening_of_New_suppliers_GRI_308_1_formerly_G4_EN32+Laureen_van_Breen.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Environmental Screening of New suppliers, GRI 308-1 (formerly G4-EN32)",
      "question": "Did the company disclose what percentage of new suppliers were screened using environmental criteria?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (\"Unknown\") {\n    0;\n  } else {\n    10;\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 624,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Disclosure_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Environmental_Screening_of_New_suppliers_GRI_308_1_formerly_G4_EN32+Laureen_van_Breen+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4579815,
      "name": "Oxfam India+Environmental Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
      "designer": "Oxfam India",
      "title": "Environmental Score",
      "question": "How transparent is the company about their environmental performance?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reputational Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~4579739",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4578309",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4572894",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574021",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574033",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574040",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574047",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574054",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4579145",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574138",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574209",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574222",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574233",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574240",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574247",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574254",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574262",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574269",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574283",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574925",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4575565",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4575897",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4576573",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4577062",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4577388",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4577687",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4577999",
          "weight": "3.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7437458",
          "weight": "3.57"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 17,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 17,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4710572,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Labour Union",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Labour_Union.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Labour Union",
      "question": "Do the company's workers have a trade union?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8696,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 6756,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Labour_Union+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4710580,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Workers Committee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Committee.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Workers Committee",
      "question": "Do the company's workers have a committee?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Organ of workforce representation in enterprises or workplaces with 50 or more employees; its purpose is to defend and promote employees' interests at work. In contrast to trade union representatives, its members are elected by and from among all the employees and hold their mandate for four years. Its powers and responsibilities include the right to negotiate company or workplace agreements; the right to information or consultation on financial, commercial and labour matters; responsibility for supervising and monitoring compliance with regulations on labour matters, social security, employment and health and safety; and the right to take administrative and legal action. Its members must observe professional confidentiality.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8569,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 6370,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Committee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4780588,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Number of Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Number_of_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Number of Workers",
      "question": "How many workers does this company have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The number of workers, especially for production and manufacturing facilities, is a good indication for the capacity the company has. By, for example, combining this kind of information with number of products produced it could then be established whether the company's turnout is exceeding its capacity which could be an indication of workers doing overtime or (illegal) subcontracting.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Workers",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 41236,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 10,
      "companies": 23958,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Supply_Chain_Workers_Disclosed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+Number_of_Workers_Yearly_Change.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Migrant_Workers_Disclosed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Number_of_employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Number_of_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4781556,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Migrant Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Migrant_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Migrant Workers",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's workforce are migrant workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Migrant workers are a particularly vulnerable group of workers as they are often dealing with language barriers and might not have the legal documentation that could get them access to local institutions and authorities in case their rights are violated. Extra due diligence to ensure this workforce is not exploited is therefore needed.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7062,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 9,
      "companies": 6131,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Migrant_Workers_Disclosed.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Migrant_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4940606,
      "name": "Oxfam India+Environmental Performance Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Performance_Score.json",
      "designer": "Oxfam India",
      "title": "Environmental Performance Score",
      "question": "How well does the company perform environmentally according to their NVG disclosures?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~4574269",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574138",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574054",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574021",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574033",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574040",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574047",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574209",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574222",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574233",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574240",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574247",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574254",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574262",
          "weight": "7.14"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Performance_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 4940816,
      "name": "Oxfam India+Environmental Disclosure Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Disclosure_Score.json",
      "designer": "Oxfam India",
      "title": "Environmental Disclosure Score",
      "question": "How much does the company disclose about their environmental performance in alignment with GRI-G4?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reputational Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~4574283",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4574925",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4575565",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4575897",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4576573",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4577062",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4577388",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4577687",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4577999",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4578309",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4579145",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4579739",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~4572894",
          "weight": "7.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7437458",
          "weight": "7.14"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Disclosure_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5251331,
      "name": "Laureen van Breen+Modern Slavery Act Disclosure Rate of Portfolio Companies",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laureen_van_Breen+Modern_Slavery_Act_Disclosure_Rate_of_Portfolio_Companies.json",
      "designer": "Laureen van Breen",
      "title": "Modern Slavery Act Disclosure Rate of Portfolio Companies",
      "question": "What percentage of the investor's portfolio companies have published a Modern Slavery Act statement?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric indicates the percentage of an investor's portfolio companies that have published a Modern Slavery Act statement. As such we can now begin to hold investors accountable for non-disclosure on the part of their investees.</p>\r\n<p>NB: Only data that is available on the Wikirate platform feeds into this assessment. In case the relationship between an investor and it's portfolio company is not capture on Wikirate.org, or if it is not known whether a company has publish an MSA statement, the case does not feed into this assessment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([statements].flat()) / tea * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "company": "Commons+Tea_Supplied_By",
          "metric": "~5253627",
          "name": "statements"
        },
        {
          "year": "latest",
          "metric": "~8040073",
          "name": "tea"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laureen_van_Breen+Modern_Slavery_Act_Disclosure_Rate_of_Portfolio_Companies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5253627,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+Modern Slavery Statement+Philipp Kuehl",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Modern_Slavery_Statement+Philipp_Kuehl.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "question": "Has the company published a Modern Slavery statement?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No - neither\":\"0\", \"else\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 72743,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 27579,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Laureen_van_Breen+Modern_Slavery_Act_Disclosure_Rate_of_Portfolio_Companies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Modern_Slavery_Statement+Philipp_Kuehl+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5256588,
      "name": "Richard Mills+Greenhouse gas disclosure rate of investees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Greenhouse_gas_disclosure_rate_of_investees.json",
      "designer": "Richard Mills",
      "title": "Greenhouse gas disclosure rate of investees",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's investees have disclosed green house gas emissions figures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([disclosers].flat()) / investees * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "company": "Commons+Shareholder Of",
          "metric": "~826615",
          "name": "disclosers"
        },
        {
          "year": "latest",
          "metric": "~4049102",
          "name": "investees"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2360,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 518,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Richard_Mills+Greenhouse_gas_disclosure_rate_of_investees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5306792,
      "name": "Climate Action Research+TCFD Supporter",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Climate_Action_Research+TCFD_Supporter.json",
      "designer": "Climate Action Research",
      "title": "TCFD Supporter",
      "question": "Has the organization expressed its support for the TCFD (Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures) recommendations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies can express their support for the TCFD recommendations by having their name added to the list of supporters on the TCFD website: <a href=\"https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/supporters-landing/\">https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/supporters-landing/ </a></p>\r\n<p>Types of <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">organizations supporting the TCFD recommendations include organizations with public debt or equity and asset managers and owners ─ the preparers and users of financial disclosures. Other supporters range from industry associations, to central banks, governments, regulators and others. [Source: </span>https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/TCFD-FAQ-Supporting-the-TCFD-Recommendations-June-2018.pdf]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>See the list of supporting organizations here: <a href=\"https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/supporters-landing/\">https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/supporters-landing/</a></p>\r\n<p>If the organization being researched is not listed, it has not signed as a supporter and the answer is \"No\".</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1948,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 14,
      "companies": 1163,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Climate_Action_Research+TCFD_Supporter+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5306839,
      "name": "Commons+Combined Scope 1, 2 and 3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Combined_Scope_1_2_and_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_GHG.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Combined Scope 1, 2 and 3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG)",
      "question": "What are the company's combined Scope 1, 2 and 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in tons of CO2 equivalent)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 + m2 + m3;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3430748"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3431550"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~849642"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3378,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1186,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Combined_Scope_1_2_and_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_GHG+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5312044,
      "name": "Commons+Women on Board",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Women_on_Board.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Women on Board",
      "question": "What percentage of people on the company's board of directors are women?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": "<p>Gender representation on corporate boards of directors refers to the proportion of men and women who occupy board member positions. To measure gender diversity on corporate boards, studies often use the percentage of women holding corporate board seats and the percentage of companies with at least one woman on their board. Globally, men occupy more board seats than women. Indeed, in 2015, women held 17.9% of the board seats on Fortune 1000 companies.</p>\r\n<p>The reasons behind the disproportionate gender ratio of directors is a subject of much debate. A survey of more than 4000 directors found that male directors over the age of 55 cited a lack of qualified female candidates as the main reason behind the stagnant number of female directors. In contrast, in the same study, female directors and younger male directors considered the male-dominated networking that often led to the appointment of directors to be the reason behind women's slow progress.</p>\r\n<p>Given that gender diversity on boards is an issue rooted in the principle of equality of treatment, inequality in gender representation on boards can be combatted through equality of opportunity reforms or equality of outcome reforms. Governments and corporations have attempted to address the disproportionality of gender representation on corporate boards through both types of measures, including legislation mandating gender quotas (a reform based on the principle of equality of outcome) and comply or explain guidelines (a reform based on the principle of equality of opportunity).</p>\r\n<p>Source: [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_representation_on_corporate_boards_of_directors|Wikipedia]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"text-align: left;\">This metric is looking for the <strong>percentage of women on the company's board of directors</strong>. Most companies include a list of their board members on the company <strong>website</strong>. Otherwise, this information may be included in an annual report.</p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">For US companies, the information may also be found in the 2020 Women on Boards [[https://www.2020wob.com/company-directory|company directory]].</p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">If you cannot find the data, answer \"Unknown\". </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5.5 Ensure women’s full participation and equal opportunities for leadership in political, economic, and public life."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~538693"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5358814"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12631591"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 5381,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 31,
      "companies": 2814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Sussex_Research_Group+Diversity_Inclusion_Disclosure.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2021+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Women_on_Board+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5314281,
      "name": "Sussex Research Group+Diversity Inclusion Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sussex_Research_Group+Diversity_Inclusion_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "Sussex Research Group",
      "title": "Diversity Inclusion Disclosure",
      "question": "How many metrics of this set did the company disclose the answer for?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, m8]);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~836097",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~837254",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~837241",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~813500",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~3447767",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~5312044",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~1830298",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m8",
          "metric": "~836314",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10548,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4405,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sussex_Research_Group+Diversity_Inclusion_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5316170,
      "name": "Climate Action 100 Plus+Climate Action 100 Plus Companies",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Climate_Action_100_Plus+Climate_Action_100_Plus_Companies.json",
      "designer": "Climate Action 100 Plus",
      "title": "Climate Action 100 Plus Companies",
      "question": "Is the company part of the Climate Action 100+ list of companies? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><a href=\"https://www.climateaction100.org\">Climate Action 100+</a> is an investor initiative that seeks to spur the world's largest corporate greenhouse gas emitters to take action on climate change.</p>\r\n<p>In December 2017, Climate Action 100+ identified a list of 100 focus companies that are systemically important greenhouse gas emitters globally. These emitters account for two-thirds of annual global industrial emissions. </p>\r\n<p>In July 2018, an additional 61 companies were added to the focus list. These companies, nominated by investor signatories, are material to to their investment portfolios, have significant opportunity to drive clean energy transition and/or may be exposed to climate-related financial risks.</p>\r\n<p>In October 2020, the initiative has total engagement to across 167 firms.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>See the Climate Action 100+ website to determine whether a company is part of the Climate Action 100+: https://www.climateaction100.org/whos-involved/companies/</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 327,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 178,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Climate_Action_100_Plus+Climate_Action_100_Plus_Companies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5340657,
      "name": "Responsible Sourcing Network+Signatory Uzbek Cotton Pledge",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Responsible_Sourcing_Network+Signatory_Uzbek_Cotton_Pledge.json",
      "designer": "Responsible Sourcing Network",
      "title": "Signatory Uzbek Cotton Pledge",
      "question": "Is the company a signatory of the pledge against forced labor in the cotton sector of Uzbekistan?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<h4>The Problem with Uzbek Cotton</h4>\r\n<p>The Uzbek government uses local government officials, hospital directors, and school presidents to mobilize workers; and detains and tortures human rights defenders seeking to monitor the harvests. The government dictates the price of inputs (seeds and fertilizers), controls irrigation, tells the farmers what to plant and when to plant it, and purchases the crops for below the market price. This abusive practice, a relic of Uzbekistan’s Soviet past, earns the Government of Uzbekistan over one billion dollars annually.</p>\r\n<p>Your participation in the Uzbek Cotton Pledge - by signing as a brand or retailer, or by supporting companies that have signed the pledge - will help end these atrocious human rights violations.</p>\r\n<h6>----</h6>\r\n<h4>Company Pledge Against Forced Labor in the Cotton Sector of Uzbekistan</h4>\r\n<p><em style=\"overflow-wrap: break-word;\">We, the undersigned companies are working to ensure that forced labor does not find its way into our products. We are aware of reports documenting the systemic use of forced labor in Uzbekistan's cotton production. We are collaborating with a multi-stakeholder coalition to raise awareness of this very serious concern, and press for its elimination.</em></p>\r\n<p><em style=\"overflow-wrap: break-word;\">As a signatory to this pledge, we are stating our firm opposition to the use of forced labor in Uzbekistan's cotton production. We commit to not knowingly source Uzbek cotton for the manufacturing of any of our products until the Government of Uzbekistan ends the practice of forced labor in its cotton sector. Until the elimination of this practice is independently verified by the International Labour Organization as well as determined by the Cotton Campaign, we will maintain this pledge.</em></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 19px;\">----</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In response to the evolving situation in Uzbekistan, the pledge was updated on July 10, 2018. To read more about the 2017 harvest and the recent edits to the pledge, check out this <a href=\"https://www.sourcingnetwork.org/blog/2018/7/9/as-commitments-escalate-in-uzbekistan-to-end-forced-labor-vigilance-needs-to-continue\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: #cf7019; transition: border-color 0.15s ease-out 0s, color 0.15s ease-out 0s; padding-bottom: 0.05em; border-bottom: 1px solid rgba(207, 112, 25, 0.3); overflow-wrap: break-word;\">blog post</a>. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Companies do not need to re-sign the pledge. Please email the Responsible Sourcing Network with any further questions.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: <a href=\"https://www.sourcingnetwork.org/uzbek-cotton-pledge\">Responsible Sourcing Network</a></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">More info on the Pledge Signatories: [[https://www.cottoncampaign.org/uzbek-cotton-pledge|Uzbek Cotton Pledge]]</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1685,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 406,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Responsible_Sourcing_Network+Signatory_Uzbek_Cotton_Pledge+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5340897,
      "name": "Responsible Sourcing Network+Signatory Turkmen Cotton Pledge",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Responsible_Sourcing_Network+Signatory_Turkmen_Cotton_Pledge.json",
      "designer": "Responsible Sourcing Network",
      "title": "Signatory Turkmen Cotton Pledge",
      "question": "Is the company a signatory of the pledge against forced labor in the cotton sector of Turkmenistan?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<h4>The Problem with Turkmen Cotton</h4>\r\n<p>Each cotton season, Turkmen public sector workers are forced by the government to fulfill cotton picking quotas and private businesses are forced to contribute to the efforts financially or with labor. To fulfill these quotas, parents often have to recruit their children’s help, despite national and international laws against forced and child labor. Every year, the harvest leaves schools, businesses, and health institutions understaffed or closed, placing a huge burden on the health, education, and general well-being of Turkmen citizens.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">----</span></p>\r\n<h4>Company Pledge Against Forced Labor in the Cotton Sector of Turkmenistan</h4>\r\n<p><em style=\"overflow-wrap: break-word;\">We, the undersigned companies are working to ensure that forced labor does not find its way into our products. We are aware of reports documenting the systemic use of forced labor in Turkmenistan’s cotton production. We are collaborating with a multi-stakeholder coalition to raise awareness of this very serious concern, and press for its elimination.</em></p>\r\n<p><em style=\"overflow-wrap: break-word;\">As a signatory to this pledge, we are stating our firm opposition to the use of forced labor in Turkmenistan’s cotton production. We commit to not knowingly source Turkmen cotton for the manufacturing of any of our products until the Government of Turkmenistan ends the practice of forced labor in its cotton sector. Until the elimination of this practice is independently verified by the International Labour Organization, as well as determined by the Cotton Campaign, we will maintain this pledge.</em></p>\r\n<p><em style=\"overflow-wrap: break-word;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-style: normal;\">----</span></em></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Your participation in the Turkmen Cotton Pledge - by signing as a brand or retailer, or by supporting companies that have signed the pledge - will help end these atrocious human rights violations.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Want to learn more? <a href=\"https://www.sourcingnetwork.org/blog/2018/6/19/the-price-for-turkmen-cotton-is-too-high\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: #cf7019; transition: border-color 0.15s ease-out 0s, color 0.15s ease-out 0s; padding-bottom: 0.05em; border-bottom: 1px solid rgba(207, 112, 25, 0.3); overflow-wrap: break-word;\">Read our latest blog post.</a></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">[[https://www.sourcingnetwork.org/turkmensignatories|List of signatories]].</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: </span><a href=\"https://www.sourcingnetwork.org/turkmen-cotton-pledge\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">Responsible Sourcing Network</a></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1302,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 412,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Responsible_Sourcing_Network+Signatory_Turkmen_Cotton_Pledge+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5346135,
      "name": "Responsible Sourcing Network+YESS Supporter",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Responsible_Sourcing_Network+YESS_Supporter.json",
      "designer": "Responsible Sourcing Network",
      "title": "YESS Supporter",
      "question": "Does the company support YESS (Yarn Ethically & Sustainably Sourced) as one approach to help drive slavery out of cotton production?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>RSN has created the initiative YESS: Yarn Ethically &amp; Sustainably Sourced to drive modern slavery out of cotton production by eliminating the market for cotton produced with forced labor, and increasing the use of ethical and sustainable cotton.</p>\r\n<p>YESS utilizes the<a href=\"http://mneguidelines.oecd.org/responsible-supply-chains-textile-garment-sector.htm\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: #cf7019; padding-bottom: 0.05em; border-bottom: 1px solid rgba(207, 112, 25, 0.3); transition: border-color 0.15s ease-out 0s, color 0.15s ease-out 0s; overflow-wrap: break-word;\"> OECD risk-based due diligence approach</a> to identify and eliminate modern slavery from cotton production and apparel supply chains. YESS is coordinating its activities with numerous sustainable cotton initiatives and other complementary programs to ensure harmonization of a due diligence system for the entire industry.</p>\r\n<h4> </h4>\r\n<h4>The Value of Creating YESS is to:</h4>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Assist companies in complying with anti-slavery regulations.</li>\r\n<li>Contribute to achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 8 and Indicator 8.7.</li>\r\n<li>Increase marketability for yarn spinners and brands sourcing ethical cotton.  </li>\r\n<li>Give consumers assurance that brands are working together to eliminate forced labor from the cotton industry.  </li>\r\n<li>Minimize verification costs and improve efficiencies.</li>\r\n<li>Train and enable yarn spinners to implement effective due diligence systems.</li>\r\n<li>Establish an industry-wide traceability approach and a global list of verified spinners and mills.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.sourcingnetwork.org/yess\">Responsible Sourcing Network</a></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 535,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 192,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Responsible_Sourcing_Network+YESS_Supporter+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5349988,
      "name": "University of Sydney SDG Research Group 2019+Emissions and Energy Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Emissions_and_Energy_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "University of Sydney SDG Research Group 2019",
      "title": "Emissions and Energy Disclosure",
      "question": "What is the company's disclosure rate out of six GHG Emissions and Energy indicators?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "/6",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6]);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~826615",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~826629",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~849642",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~846580",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~836952",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~836964",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 5856,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 1644,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Emissions_and_Energy_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Emissions_and_Energy_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5358814,
      "name": "Core+Women on Board",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Women_on_Board.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Women on Board",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's board of directors are women?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Gender representation on corporate boards of directors refers to the proportion of men and women who occupy board member positions. To measure gender diversity on corporate boards, studies often use the percentage of women holding corporate board seats and the percentage of companies with at least one woman on their board. Globally, men occupy more board seats than women. Indeed, in 2015, women held 17.9% of the board seats on Fortune 1000 companies.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The reasons behind the disproportionate gender ratio of directors is a subject of much debate. A survey of more than 4000 directors found that male directors over the age of 55 cited a lack of qualified female candidates as the main reason behind the stagnant number of female directors. In contrast, in the same study, female directors and younger male directors considered the male-dominated networking that often led to the appointment of directors to be the reason behind women's slow progress.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Given that gender diversity on boards is an issue rooted in the principle of equality of treatment, inequality in gender representation on boards can be combatted through equality of opportunity reforms or equality of outcome reforms. Governments and corporations have attempted to address the disproportionality of gender representation on corporate boards through both types of measures, including legislation mandating gender quotas (a reform based on the principle of equality of outcome) and comply or explain guidelines (a reform based on the principle of equality of opportunity).</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To find w<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">hat percentage of a company's board of directors are women, look for</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> the details on a company's website or in their sustainability or annual reports. Companies may report the number of women and number of men (and then you will need to calculate the percentage).</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For US companies, you can check the 2020 Women on Boards</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><a href=\"https://www.2020wob.com/company-directory\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"font-size: 15.2px; background-color: #ffffff;\">company directory</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If you cannot find the data, answer \"Unknown\". </span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 766,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 50,
      "companies": 400,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Women_on_Board.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Women_on_Board.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Women_on_Board+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5386232,
      "name": "Research project 2019 SDG 6+Dangerous Waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_project_2019_SDG_6+Dangerous_Waste.json",
      "designer": "Research project 2019 SDG 6",
      "title": "Dangerous Waste",
      "question": "How many tons of dangerous waste and RAEES does the company have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_project_2019_SDG_6+Dangerous_Waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5386240,
      "name": "Research project 2019 SDG 6+PCB free transformers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_project_2019_SDG_6+PCB_free_transformers.json",
      "designer": "Research project 2019 SDG 6",
      "title": "PCB free transformers",
      "question": "What is the percentage of PCB-free transformers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "1-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_project_2019_SDG_6+PCB_free_transformers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5394261,
      "name": "University of Sydney SDG Research Group 2019+Emissions and Energy Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Emissions_and_Energy_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "University of Sydney SDG Research Group 2019",
      "title": "Emissions and Energy Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following six GHG Emissions and Energy indicators are disclosed?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric looks at companies' disclosure rates based on six emissions and energy metrics researched by the University of Sydney research group on metrics relevant to SDG7 and SDG13. </span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / 6 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5349988"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 5856,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 1644,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Emissions_and_Energy_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5394701,
      "name": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group+Emissions yearly change",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Emissions_yearly_change.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate Calculated Metric Design Group",
      "title": "Emissions yearly change",
      "question": "What is the percentage change from the previous year of the company's GHG emissions (Scope 1&2) per employee?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  (m1 - m2) / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3479243"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3479243",
          "year": "-1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1940,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 671,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_Calculated_Metric_Design_Group+Emissions_yearly_change+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5395162,
      "name": "University of Sydney SDG Research Group 2019+Social Metrics Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "University of Sydney SDG Research Group 2019",
      "title": "Social Metrics Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following seven social indicators are disclosed?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric looks at companies' disclosure rates based on seven social metrics researched by the University of Sydney research group on metrics relevant to SDG3, SDG5 &amp; SDG8. </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  (numKnown([m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7])) / 7 * 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~836080",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~837254",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~837241",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~836097",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~815203",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~836973",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~836314",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 6601,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2301,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2019+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5402509,
      "name": "Aileen Rob+Yearly Change Scope 1 and 2 Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+Yearly_Change_Scope_1_and_2_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Aileen Rob",
      "title": "Yearly Change Scope 1 and 2 Emissions",
      "question": "What is the yearly change of the company's combined scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions? ",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  (m1 - m2) / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3432335"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3432335",
          "year": "-1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2942,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 872,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+Yearly_Change_Scope_1_and_2_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5405527,
      "name": "Ellen MacArthur Foundation+Make Fashion Circular Participant",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Ellen_MacArthur_Foundation+Make_Fashion_Circular_Participant.json",
      "designer": "Ellen MacArthur Foundation",
      "title": "Make Fashion Circular Participant",
      "question": "Is the company a participant or core partner of the Make Fashion Circular Initiative?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><a href=\"https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/our-work/activities/make-fashion-circular\">Make Fashion Circular</a> drives collaboration between industry leaders and other key stakeholders to create a textiles economy fit for the 21st century. Its ambition is to ensure clothes are made from safe and renewable materials, new business models increase their use, and old clothes are turned into new. This new textiles economy would benefit business, society, and the environment. The initiative was set-up by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation.</p>\r\n<p>Participants from across the fashion industry will drive the momentum towards the vision to Make Fashion Circular.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Check the <a href=\"https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/our-work/activities/make-fashion-circular/participants\">Make Fashion Circular participant list</a> for the company you are researching.</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answer ‘Core Partner’</span> if the company or organization is a listed on as a core partner.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answer ‘Participant’</span> if the company or organization is listed on the participant list.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Answer ‘No’</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></strong><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">if the company or organization is not listed.</span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Core Partner",
        "Participant",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Member List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 61,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 12,
      "companies": 58,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Ellen_MacArthur_Foundation+Make_Fashion_Circular_Participant+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5405969,
      "name": "Nottingham Trent SDG Summer School 2019 Research Group+Nottingham Trent SDG Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Nottingham Trent SDG Summer School 2019 Research Group",
      "title": "Nottingham Trent SDG Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What is the company's disclosure rate out of 25 SDG indicators?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric calculates a company's disclosure rate based on 25 SDG metrics researched by the <a href=\"/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_Research_2019\">Nottingham Trent SDG Summer School 2019</a> on indicators relevant to SDG 9, SDG 10, SDG 12, SDG 13 and SDG 14.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, m8, m9, m10, m11, m12, m13, m14, m15, m16, m17, m18, m19, m20, m21, m22, m23, m24, m25]) * 4;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~836246",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~836274",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~826615",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~837254",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~849642",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~836794",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~836952",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m8",
          "metric": "~3341320",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m9",
          "metric": "~1828243",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m10",
          "metric": "~836262",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m11",
          "metric": "~849130",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m12",
          "metric": "~836651",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m13",
          "metric": "~837241",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m14",
          "metric": "~1830298",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m15",
          "metric": "~5358814",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m16",
          "metric": "~848767",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m17",
          "metric": "~837199",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m18",
          "metric": "~848876",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m19",
          "metric": "~826629",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m20",
          "metric": "~836964",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m21",
          "metric": "~1522301",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m22",
          "metric": "~846580",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m23",
          "metric": "~814954",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m24",
          "metric": "~849548",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m25",
          "metric": "~3447767",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 8242,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2392,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Summer_School_2019_Research_Group+Nottingham_Trent_SDG_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5406500,
      "name": "Textile Exchange+Textile Exchange Member",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Textile_Exchange+Textile_Exchange_Member.json",
      "designer": "Textile Exchange",
      "title": "Textile Exchange Member",
      "question": "Is the company a member of the Textile Exchange? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Textile Exchange is a global non-profit that works closely with our members to drive industry transformation in preferred fibers, integrity and standards and responsible supply networks.</p>\r\n<p>Members may be new to sustainability practices or want to take their strategy to the next level. Textile Exchange members include textile suppliers, service providers, manufacturers, brands and retailers, and farmers.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Check the <a href=\"https://textileexchange.org/members/\">Textile Exchange member list</a> for the company you are researching.</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answer ‘Yes’</span> if the company or organization is listed.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Answer ‘No’</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">if the company or organization is not listed.</span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Member List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 841,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 12,
      "companies": 459,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Textile_Exchange+Textile_Exchange_Member+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5410970,
      "name": "Fair Wear Foundation+Fair Wear Foundation Member",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fair_Wear_Foundation+Fair_Wear_Foundation_Member.json",
      "designer": "Fair Wear Foundation",
      "title": "Fair Wear Foundation Member",
      "question": "Is the company a member of the Fair Wear Foundation? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Fair Wear Foundation works with brands and industry influencers to improve working conditions in the clothing industry. </p>\r\n<p>When companies join Fair Wear Foundation, they commit to implementing the FWF Code of Labour Practices in their supply chains. During the annual Performance Check, FWF assesses whether brands meet the requirements that follow from this commitment.</p>\r\n<p>Fair Wear Foundation Code of Labour Practices:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>Employment is freely chosen</li>\r\n<li>There is no discrimination in employment</li>\r\n<li>No exploitation of child labour</li>\r\n<li>Freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining</li>\r\n<li>Payment of a living wage</li>\r\n<li>Reasonable hours of work</li>\r\n<li>Safe and healthy working conditions</li>\r\n<li>Legally binding employment relationship</li>\r\n</ol>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Check the <a href=\"https://www.fairwear.org/brands/\">Fair Wear Foundation member list</a> for the company you are researching.</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answer ‘Current Member’</span> if the company is listed on the current members page.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answer ‘Suspended’</span> if the company is listed on the suspended members page. </p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Answer ‘Former Member’</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">if the company is listed on the former members page. Make sure you select the correct year(s) given for the period of membership.</span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li><strong><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Answer 'No'</span></strong><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> if the company is not listed on any of the members pages. </span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Current Member",
        "Former Member",
        "Suspended",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Member List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 383,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 162,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Multi_stakeholder_Initiative_Memberships_MSIs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fair_Wear_Foundation+Fair_Wear_Foundation_Member+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5412042,
      "name": "Center for Responsive Politics+US Lobbying Expenditure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Responsive_Politics+US_Lobbying_Expenditure.json",
      "designer": "Center for Responsive Politics",
      "title": "US Lobbying Expenditure",
      "question": "What is the company's total annual US lobbying expenditure?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><a href=\"https://www.opensecrets.org/\">The Center for Responsive Politics</a> is a nonprofit with a mission to track money in US politics and its effect on elections and policy. Their vision is to inform, empower and advocate citizens by providing them with clear and unbiased information about political spending. The mission of the CRP is to produce and disseminate data and analysis on money in politics. </p>\r\n<p>The Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 requires all active registrants to file quarterly reports with the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives and Secretary of the U.S. Senate. The Center for Responsive Politics has created an <a href=\"https://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/index.php\">open database</a> of lobbying disclosure data on their website opensecrets.org which is regularly updated. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the <a href=\"https://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/search.php\">Lobbying Database</a> of the Center for Responsive Politics. Search the company you are researching in the client search. Find their <em>Total Lobbying Expenditures </em>and enter the total in the answer box. Cite the page where you found the information as a source.</p>\r\n<p>If you cannot find the company in the database, enter 'Unknown' as the answer and cite the Lobbying Database as a source. </p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Accountability Index",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 40,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 22,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Responsive_Politics+US_Lobbying_Expenditure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5412778,
      "name": "Center for Responsive Politics+Employees Engaged in US Lobbying",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Responsive_Politics+Employees_Engaged_in_US_Lobbying.json",
      "designer": "Center for Responsive Politics",
      "title": "Employees Engaged in US Lobbying",
      "question": "What is the total annual number of lobbyists representing the company in the US?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"https://www.opensecrets.org/\">The Center for Responsive Politics</a> is a nonprofit with a mission to track money in US politics and its effect on elections and policy. Their vision is to inform, empower and advocate citizens by providing them with clear and unbiased information about political spending. The mission of the CRP is to produce and disseminate data and analysis on money in politics. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 requires all active registrants to file quarterly reports with the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives and Secretary of the U.S. Senate. The Center for Responsive Politics has created an <a href=\"https://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/index.php\">open database</a> of lobbying disclosure data on their website opensecrets.org which is regularly updated. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Go to the <a href=\"https://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/search.php\">Lobbying Database</a> of the Center for Responsive Politics. Search the company you are researching in the client search. Go to the tab <em>Lobbyists </em>and enter the <em>Total Number of Lobbyists</em> into the answer box. Cite the page where you found the information as a source.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If you cannot find the company in the database, enter 'Unknown' as the answer and cite the Lobbying Database as a source. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Accountability Index",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Responsive_Politics+Employees_Engaged_in_US_Lobbying+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5412982,
      "name": "ACT Action, Collaboration, Transformation+ACT Member",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ACT_Action_Collaboration_Transformation+ACT_Member.json",
      "designer": "ACT Action, Collaboration, Transformation",
      "title": "ACT Member",
      "question": "Is the company an ACT (Action, Collaboration, Transformation) corporate signatory? \r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>ACT (Action, Collaboration, Transformation) is a ground-breaking agreement between global brands and retailers and trade unions to transform garment, textile and footwear industry and achieve living wages for workers through collective bargaining at industry level linked to purchasing practices.</p>\r\n<p>ACT is the first global commitment on living wages in the sector that provides a framework through which all relevant actors, including brands and retailers, trade unions, manufacturers, and governments, can exercise their responsibility and role in achieving living wages.</p>\r\n<p>ACT members have agreed the following the principles:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>A joint approach is needed where all participants in global supply chains assume their respective responsibilities in achieving freedom of association, collective bargaining and living wages.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Agreement on a living wage should be reached through collective bargaining between employers and workers and their representatives, at industry level.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Workers must be free and able to exercise their right to organize and bargain collectively in accordance with ILO Conventions.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<div>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Check the<a href=\"https://actonlivingwages.com/who-we-are/list-of-members/\"> ACT Member list</a> for the company you are researching.</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answer ‘Yes’</span> if the company or organization is listed.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Answer ‘No’</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">if the company or organization is not listed.</span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</div>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Member List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 246,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 120,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ACT_Action_Collaboration_Transformation+ACT_Member+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5414321,
      "name": "Textile Exchange+Responsible Down Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Textile_Exchange+Responsible_Down_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "Textile Exchange",
      "title": "Responsible Down Commitment",
      "question": "Has the company made a public commitment to source products certified to the Responsible Down Standard? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The <a href=\"https://responsibledown.org/\">Responsible Down Standard</a> is an initiative of the <a href=\"https://textileexchange.org/\">Textile Exchange</a> to safeguard the welfare of geese and ducks involved in the down and feather industry. Companies who certify their products to the Responsible Down Standard abide by certain conditions, including: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Any removal of down and feathers from live birds (live-plucking or molt-harvesting) is prohibited</li>\r\n<li>Force-feeding is prohibited</li>\r\n<li>Holistic respect for animal welfare of the birds from hatching to slaughter</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Read the full Responsible Down Standard <a href=\"https://responsibledown.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/RDS-101-V3.0-2019.07.01.pdf\">here</a>. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Browse the <a href=\"https://responsibledown.org/find-responsible-down-standard/\">Responsible Down Standard commitment list</a> for the company you are researching.</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answer ‘Yes’</span> if the company or organization is listed.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Answer ‘No’</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">if the company or organization is not listed.</span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Signatory List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 704,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 162,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Textile_Exchange+Responsible_Down_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5414787,
      "name": "Textile Exchange+Responsible Down Standard Certification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Textile_Exchange+Responsible_Down_Standard_Certification.json",
      "designer": "Textile Exchange",
      "title": "Responsible Down Standard Certification",
      "question": "Is the company a Responsible Down Standard certified supplier? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The <a href=\"https://responsibledown.org/\">Responsible Down Standard</a> is an initiative of the <a href=\"https://textileexchange.org/\">Textile Exchange</a> to safeguard the welfare of geese and ducks involved in the down and feather industry. Companies who certify their products to the Responsible Down Standard abide by certain conditions, including: </p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>Any removal of down and feathers from live birds (live-plucking or molt-harvesting) is prohibited</li>\r\n<li>Force-feeding is prohibited</li>\r\n<li>Holistic respect for animal welfare of the birds from hatching to slaughter</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Read the full Responsible Down Standard <a href=\"https://responsibledown.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/RDS-101-V3.0-2019.07.01.pdf\">here</a>. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Browse the [[https://textileexchange.org/standards/find-certified-company/rds-certified/|Responsible Down Supplier List]] </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">or the company you are researching.</span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answer ‘Yes’</span> if the company or organization is listed.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Answer ‘No’</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">if the company or organization is not listed.</span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Standard",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 339,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 9,
      "companies": 339,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Textile_Exchange+Responsible_Down_Standard_Certification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5418087,
      "name": "Textile Exchange+Responsible Wool Standard Certification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Textile_Exchange+Responsible_Wool_Standard_Certification.json",
      "designer": "Textile Exchange",
      "title": "Responsible Wool Standard Certification",
      "question": "Is the company a Responsible Wool Standard certified organization? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The <a href=\"https://responsiblewool.org/\">Responsible Wool Standard</a> is an initiative of the <a href=\"https://textileexchange.org/\">Textile Exchange</a> to safeguard the welfare of sheep involved in the wool industry. Companies who certify their products to the Responsible Wool Standard abide by certain conditions, including: </p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>To respect the <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_freedoms\">Five Freedoms</a> of the animals who provide the wool</li>\r\n<li>To meet their obligations to respect the land</li>\r\n<li>To meet the trust of consumers who choose RWS products</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Read the full Responsible Wool Standard <a href=\"https://responsiblewool.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/RWS-standard.pdf\">here</a>. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Browse the <a href=\"https://responsiblewool.org/find-rws-certified-organizations/\">Responsible Wool Standard certification list</a> for the company you are researching.</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answer ‘Yes’</span> if the company or organization is listed.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Answer ‘No’</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">if the company or organization is not listed.</span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Standard",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 275,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 9,
      "companies": 178,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Textile_Exchange+Responsible_Wool_Standard_Certification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5434801,
      "name": "Public Eye Research Group+References to a living wage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Public_Eye_Research_Group+References_to_a_living_wage.json",
      "designer": "Public Eye Research Group",
      "title": "References to a living wage",
      "question": "Mentioning \"living wage\": Does the company mention \"living wage\" or equivalent terms or translations on its website or in public company documents? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Why is that important? Just mentioning a \"living wage\" does not increase any salary. But if the company uses the term, the link to the source provides a valuable starting point for deeper research into the companies' engagement on wages. Therefore this question is less important in practice, but very useful for research and advocacy work. </p>\r\n<p><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   \r\n  \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   Normal \r\n   0 \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   21 \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   false \r\n   false \r\n   false \r\n   \r\n   DE-CH \r\n   JA \r\n   AR-SA \r\n   \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n  \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 10]>\r\n \r\n /* Style Definitions */\r\n table.MsoNormalTable\r\n\t{mso-style-name:\"Normale Tabelle\";\r\n\tmso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-tstyle-colband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-style-noshow:yes;\r\n\tmso-style-priority:99;\r\n\tmso-style-parent:\"\";\r\n\tmso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-top:0cm;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-right:0cm;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-left:0cm;\r\n\tline-height:107%;\r\n\tmso-pagination:widow-orphan;\r\n\tfont-size:11.0pt;\r\n\tfont-family:\"Calibri\",sans-serif;\r\n\tmso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;\r\n\tmso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;\r\n\tmso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;\r\n\tmso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;\r\n\tmso-bidi-font-family:Arial;\r\n\tmso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;\r\n\tmso-fareast-language:EN-US;}\r\ntable.MsoTableGrid\r\n\t{mso-style-name:Tabellenraster;\r\n\tmso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-tstyle-colband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-style-priority:39;\r\n\tmso-style-unhide:no;\r\n\tborder:solid windowtext 1.0pt;\r\n\tmso-border-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;\r\n\tmso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;\r\n\tmso-border-insideh:.5pt solid windowtext;\r\n\tmso-border-insidev:.5pt solid windowtext;\r\n\tmso-para-margin:0cm;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;\r\n\tmso-pagination:widow-orphan;\r\n\tfont-size:11.0pt;\r\n\tfont-family:\"Calibri\",sans-serif;\r\n\tmso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;\r\n\tmso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;\r\n\tmso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;\r\n\tmso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;\r\n\tmso-bidi-font-family:Arial;\r\n\tmso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;\r\n\tmso-fareast-language:EN-US;}\r\n \r\n<![endif]--></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   \r\n  \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   Normal \r\n   0 \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   21 \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   false \r\n   false \r\n   false \r\n   \r\n   DE-CH \r\n   X-NONE \r\n   X-NONE \r\n   \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n   \r\n   \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n  \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 10]>\r\n \r\n /* Style Definitions */\r\n table.MsoNormalTable\r\n\t{mso-style-name:\"Normale Tabelle\";\r\n\tmso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-tstyle-colband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-style-noshow:yes;\r\n\tmso-style-priority:99;\r\n\tmso-style-parent:\"\";\r\n\tmso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-top:0cm;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-right:0cm;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-left:0cm;\r\n\tline-height:107%;\r\n\tmso-pagination:widow-orphan;\r\n\tfont-size:11.0pt;\r\n\tfont-family:\"Calibri\",sans-serif;\r\n\tmso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;\r\n\tmso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;\r\n\tmso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;\r\n\tmso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;\r\n\tmso-bidi-font-family:\"Times New Roman\";\r\n\tmso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;\r\n\tmso-fareast-language:EN-US;}\r\n \r\n<![endif]--></p>\r\n<p>Mentioning \"living wage\"</p>\r\n<p>Does the company mention \"living wage\" or equivalent terms or translations on its website or in public company documents?</p>\r\n<p>Options</p>\r\n<p>- yes</p>\r\n<p>- partial</p>\r\n<p>- nothing found</p>\r\n<p>Select yes if:<br>- one of the following terms or a direct synonyms or direct translation appears on the website or in a public document of the company. Please cite the exact term found in the comment field. Examples for equivalent terms include \"Living Wage\", Living Wages\", \"Living Income\", \"Living Incomes\", \"Existenzlohn\", \"Existenzlöhne\", \"Existenzsichernder Lohn\", \"Existenzsichernde Löhne\", \"Existenzsichernde Einkommen\", Existenzsicherndes Entgelt\", \"Salaire Vital\".</p>\r\n<p>Select partial if:<br>- the company does not use the term \"Living Wage\" or a direct synomym or translation, but the company still provides meaninfgul information on wages in its supply chain, such as an explanation of its apprach to ensure fair wages.</p>\r\n<p>Select \"nothing found\" if:<br>- None of the terms were found found.<br>- No other meaningful information on wages in the supply chain was found.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": "{ \"yes\": \"ccc-pe-19.yes\", \"partial\": \"ccc-pe-19.partial\", \"nothing found\": \"ccc-pe-19.notFound\"}",
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 266,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 266,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Public_Eye_Research_Group+References_to_a_living_wage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5434811,
      "name": "Public Eye Research Group+Action plan for living wages",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Public_Eye_Research_Group+Action_plan_for_living_wages.json",
      "designer": "Public Eye Research Group",
      "title": "Action plan for living wages",
      "question": "Time-bound living wage roadmap: Does the company have a public, time-bound roadmap or strategy for how it will achieve a living wage for all workers across its supplier network for garments in a reasonable time? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">Why is that important? Without a time-bound roadmap (or strategy), a commitment to a living wage lacks substance. It is relatively easy for a company to only generally commit to a Living Wage without undertaking any concrete steps to ensure it becomes reality. A public roadmap in contrast allows workers, trade unions, consumers and citizens to assess what a company is doing to increase wages in its supply chain until at least living wage level has been reached. It is important that such a roadmap or strategy is time-bound, transparent and the company reports about the progress, because otherwise it is not possible to assess whether there is real progress. Addditionally, roadmaps can provide examples for other companies on how to move towards living wages.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\"> <br></span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   \r\n  \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   Normal \r\n   0 \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   21 \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   false \r\n   false \r\n   false \r\n   \r\n   DE-CH \r\n   X-NONE \r\n   X-NONE \r\n   \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n   \r\n   \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n  \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 10]>\r\n \r\n /* Style Definitions */\r\n table.MsoNormalTable\r\n\t{mso-style-name:\"Normale Tabelle\";\r\n\tmso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-tstyle-colband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-style-noshow:yes;\r\n\tmso-style-priority:99;\r\n\tmso-style-parent:\"\";\r\n\tmso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-top:0cm;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-right:0cm;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-left:0cm;\r\n\tline-height:107%;\r\n\tmso-pagination:widow-orphan;\r\n\tfont-size:11.0pt;\r\n\tfont-family:\"Calibri\",sans-serif;\r\n\tmso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;\r\n\tmso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;\r\n\tmso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;\r\n\tmso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;\r\n\tmso-bidi-font-family:\"Times New Roman\";\r\n\tmso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;\r\n\tmso-fareast-language:EN-US;}\r\n \r\n<![endif]--></p>\r\n<p><strong><span style=\"mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">Time-bound living wage roadmap</span></strong></p>\r\n<p><strong><span style=\"mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">Does the company have a public, time-bound roadmap or strategy for how it will achieve a living wage for all workers across its supplier network for garments in a reasonable time?</span></strong></p>\r\n<p><strong>Reply options</strong></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">yes</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">partial</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">nothing found</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 106%; mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">Select yes if:<br>- Company presents evidence that all or nearly all workers at suppliers earn at least a living wage<br>Or<br>- Company publish a roadmap or comparable strategy the explains how the company will secure living wages to all or nearly all workers in its supply chain for garments within no more than 10 years.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 106%; mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">Select partial if:<br>- Company publishes a roadmap for how to achieve living wages for all or a majority of its garment workers but not with meeting all requirements for a yes (for example because the roadmap is not timebound)</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 106%; mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">select \"nothing found\" if:<br>- Company publishes nothing<br>or<br>- Company publishes nothing meaningful</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": "{ \"yes\": \"ccc-pe-19.yes\", \"partial\": \"ccc-pe-19.partial\", \"nothing found\": \"ccc-pe-19.notFound\"}",
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Public_Eye_Research_Group+Action_plan_for_living_wages+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5434821,
      "name": "Public Eye Research Group+Transparency in Supply Chains",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Public_Eye_Research_Group+Transparency_in_Supply_Chains.json",
      "designer": "Public Eye Research Group",
      "title": "Transparency in Supply Chains",
      "question": "Supply Chain Transparency: Does the company disclose names, addresses and other relevant information about its suppliers? \r\n\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   \r\n  \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   Normal \r\n   0 \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   21 \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   false \r\n   false \r\n   false \r\n   \r\n   DE-CH \r\n   X-NONE \r\n   X-NONE \r\n   \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n   \r\n   \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n  \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 10]>\r\n \r\n /* Style Definitions */\r\n table.MsoNormalTable\r\n\t{mso-style-name:\"Normale Tabelle\";\r\n\tmso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-tstyle-colband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-style-noshow:yes;\r\n\tmso-style-priority:99;\r\n\tmso-style-parent:\"\";\r\n\tmso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-top:0cm;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-right:0cm;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-left:0cm;\r\n\tline-height:107%;\r\n\tmso-pagination:widow-orphan;\r\n\tfont-size:11.0pt;\r\n\tfont-family:\"Calibri\",sans-serif;\r\n\tmso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;\r\n\tmso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;\r\n\tmso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;\r\n\tmso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;\r\n\tmso-bidi-font-family:\"Times New Roman\";\r\n\tmso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;\r\n\tmso-fareast-language:EN-US;}\r\n \r\n<![endif]--></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\">Why is that important?<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">  </span>Supply chain transparency allows workers and trade unions to know which brands source from a specific factory and allows them to report issues and campaign or negotiate for higher wages directly with a brand. It allows for independent investigations in the suppling factories and helps to monitor if a company has a stable supplier base with long lasting business relationships.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">   </span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   \r\n  \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   Normal \r\n   0 \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   21 \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   false \r\n   false \r\n   false \r\n   \r\n   DE-CH \r\n   X-NONE \r\n   X-NONE \r\n   \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n   \r\n   \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n  \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 10]>\r\n \r\n /* Style Definitions */\r\n table.MsoNormalTable\r\n\t{mso-style-name:\"Normale Tabelle\";\r\n\tmso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-tstyle-colband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-style-noshow:yes;\r\n\tmso-style-priority:99;\r\n\tmso-style-parent:\"\";\r\n\tmso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-top:0cm;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-right:0cm;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-left:0cm;\r\n\tline-height:107%;\r\n\tmso-pagination:widow-orphan;\r\n\tfont-size:11.0pt;\r\n\tfont-family:\"Calibri\",sans-serif;\r\n\tmso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;\r\n\tmso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;\r\n\tmso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;\r\n\tmso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;\r\n\tmso-bidi-font-family:\"Times New Roman\";\r\n\tmso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;\r\n\tmso-fareast-language:EN-US;}\r\n \r\n<![endif]--></p>\r\n<p><strong><span style=\"mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">Supply Chain Transparency</span></strong></p>\r\n<p><strong><span style=\"mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">Does the company disclose names, addresses and other relevant information about its suppliers?</span></strong></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\"><strong>Reply options</strong><span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">   </span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">yes</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">partial</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">nothing found</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 106%; mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">Select yes if:<br>- Company discloses names and addresses of authorized factories and subcontractors and information on number of workers, product types and parent companies (ownership of suppliers).<br>or<br>- Company if fully aligned with the transparency pledge, see data at Clean Clothes Campaign website: https://cleanclothes.org/transparency</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 106%; mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">Select partial if:<br>- Company discloses names and addresses of some, but not all of its factories and subcontractors<br>or<br>- Company discloses names and addresses of its suppliers, but no information on numbers of workers and type of products.<br>or<br>- Company if partially aligned with the transparency pledge, see data at Clean Clothes Campaign website: https://cleanclothes.org/transparency</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 106%; mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">Select \"nothing found\" if:<br>- Company does not publish names or adresses of suppliers<br>or<br>- Company only publishes names and adresses of a minor part of ist suppliers (for example a portrait of one supplier, but nothing on other supliers)</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": "{ \"yes\": \"ccc-pe-19.yes\", \"partial\": \"ccc-pe-19.partial\", \"nothing found\": \"ccc-pe-19.notFound\"}",
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 249,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 249,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Public_Eye_Research_Group+Transparency_in_Supply_Chains+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5434831,
      "name": "Public Eye Research Group+Wage Transparency",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Public_Eye_Research_Group+Wage_Transparency.json",
      "designer": "Public Eye Research Group",
      "title": "Wage Transparency",
      "question": "Wage transparency: Does the company publish information on wages currently paid to workers at its suppliers? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   \r\n  \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   Normal \r\n   0 \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   21 \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   false \r\n   false \r\n   false \r\n   \r\n   DE-CH \r\n   X-NONE \r\n   X-NONE \r\n   \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n   \r\n   \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n  \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 10]>\r\n \r\n /* Style Definitions */\r\n table.MsoNormalTable\r\n\t{mso-style-name:\"Normale Tabelle\";\r\n\tmso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-tstyle-colband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-style-noshow:yes;\r\n\tmso-style-priority:99;\r\n\tmso-style-parent:\"\";\r\n\tmso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-top:0cm;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-right:0cm;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-left:0cm;\r\n\tline-height:107%;\r\n\tmso-pagination:widow-orphan;\r\n\tfont-size:11.0pt;\r\n\tfont-family:\"Calibri\",sans-serif;\r\n\tmso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;\r\n\tmso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;\r\n\tmso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;\r\n\tmso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;\r\n\tmso-bidi-font-family:\"Times New Roman\";\r\n\tmso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;\r\n\tmso-fareast-language:EN-US;}\r\n \r\n<![endif]--></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">Why is that important? If inequality and exploitation are as pronounced as in the global supply chains of the fashion industry, then the question of actually paid wages should not be a secret but should be dicussed in public. With the publication of concrete payroll data, companies allow to understand where they and their suppliers stand and how they progress on wages. And they fuel the necessary public debate about wages in the textile industry.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   \r\n  \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   Normal \r\n   0 \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   21 \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   false \r\n   false \r\n   false \r\n   \r\n   DE-CH \r\n   X-NONE \r\n   X-NONE \r\n   \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n   \r\n   \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n  \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 10]>\r\n \r\n /* Style Definitions */\r\n table.MsoNormalTable\r\n\t{mso-style-name:\"Normale Tabelle\";\r\n\tmso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-tstyle-colband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-style-noshow:yes;\r\n\tmso-style-priority:99;\r\n\tmso-style-parent:\"\";\r\n\tmso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-top:0cm;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-right:0cm;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-left:0cm;\r\n\tline-height:107%;\r\n\tmso-pagination:widow-orphan;\r\n\tfont-size:11.0pt;\r\n\tfont-family:\"Calibri\",sans-serif;\r\n\tmso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;\r\n\tmso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;\r\n\tmso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;\r\n\tmso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;\r\n\tmso-bidi-font-family:\"Times New Roman\";\r\n\tmso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;\r\n\tmso-fareast-language:EN-US;}\r\n \r\n<![endif]--></p>\r\n<p><strong><span style=\"mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">Wage transparency</span></strong></p>\r\n<p><strong><span style=\"mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">Does the company publish information on wages currently paid to workers at its suppliers?</span></strong></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>Reply options </strong></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">yes</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">partial</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">nothing found</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 106%; mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">Select yes if:<br>- Company publishes detailed and specific information on wages in its supply chain, including concrete amounts, covering a major part of its suppliers and workers in the supply chain.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 106%; mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">Select partial if:<br>- Company publishes wage information only in a very general form or only gives some examples.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10.0pt; line-height: 106%; mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; color: black; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: DE-CH;\">select \"nothing found\" if:<br>- Company publishes nothing<br>or<br>- Company publishes nothing meaningful</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-ansi-language: EN-US;\"> </span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": "{ \"yes\": \"ccc-pe-19.yes\", \"partial\": \"ccc-pe-19.partial\", \"nothing found\": \"ccc-pe-19.notFound\"}",
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 247,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 247,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Public_Eye_Research_Group+Wage_Transparency+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5448628,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA historic record",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_historic_record.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA historic record",
      "question": "Does the company provide links to their modern slavery statements from previous years (either on their website or in their current statement)?\r\n*Note: When researching this metric the \"Year\" field should be set to the current year.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>To be able to assess whether companies are improving their modern slavery due diligence over time, the Modern Slavery Act requires companies to publish a statement for every financial year and to make these publicly available. However, companies will often remove statements from previous years, once a new statement is released. This hampers the ability of stakeholders to make year-on-year assessments and hold business to account over a longer period of time.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Does the company <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">provide a historic record of their modern slavery statements</span>?</p>\r\n<p>*This metric refers only to Modern Slavery Act Statements (UK or AUS). It does not apply to companies publishing a record of statements covering the California Supply Chain Transparency Act.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">You will probably need to add a new source representing the homepage, so click the \"Add a new source\" button and enter the company's homepage URL as the new source </span><span style=\"text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">or [[https://wikirate.org/Saving_a_webpage_as_a_PDF| save the page as a PDF and add as a file]].</span></p>\r\n<p>Select:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Yes. </strong>The company provides links to any of their previous statements (either on their website or in their current statement). Provide details about where you found it and how many previous statements they link to in the comment section.</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">No. </span>If no such links exist on their website or in the current statement.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">When researching this metric the \"</span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">Year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\" field should be set to the <strong>current year</strong>.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2412,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 66,
      "companies": 1263,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_historic_record+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5454264,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Organizational structure and operations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Organizational_structure_and_operations.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Organizational structure and operations",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the ownership structures (or business models) of its brands, subsidiaries, and other businesses?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p> </p>\r\n<p>The UK and Australian Modern Slavery Acts requires that organisations disclose their structure, business, and operations. This is to allow those assessing the statements to understand the boundaries of the statement and to support the identification of risk based on business models, location of operations, goods and services sourced, and <a style=\"mso-comment-reference: PC_1; mso-comment-date: 20190920T1110;\">workforce.</a></p>\r\n<div style=\"mso-element: footnote-list;\">\r\n<div style=\"mso-element: footnote;\">Source: <a href=\"http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/30/section/54/enacted\">UK Government 2015, “Modern Slavery Act”</a></div>\r\n<div style=\"mso-element: footnote;\">Source: [[https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/criminal-justice/files/modern-slavery-reporting-entities.pdf|Australian Guidance for Reporting Entities]]</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Does the company <strong>disclose the structure, operations and/or business model(s)</strong> of its brands, subsidiaries, and other businesses covered by their modern slavery statement?</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Such disclosures can include: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">the legal and organisational form of the company, including legal classification, number of employees, geographic location, whether it is part of a larger group of companies, and whether it owns or controls other entities (structure).</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">the activities undertaken by the company to pursue its business objectives or strategy, for example, processing and production, direct employment of workers, construction, provision and delivery of products and services, financial services etc (operations)</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Please select <strong>\"Yes\"</strong>, providing quotations and page numbers in the comment section, if the company:</p>\r\n<div>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Discloses the<strong> legal and organisational form of the company</strong>, including at least one subsidiaries, controlled entities, parent companies, joint ventures. Please note that licensees do not count as subsidiaries. </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>OR</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Explicitly states that <strong>it does not control or own any other companies</strong>. </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>AND/OR</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Discloses <strong>any information on its business model and operations</strong>, including the types of activities it undertakes.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</div>\r\n<p>Please select <strong>\"No\"</strong>, if the company:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Discloses no such information in the statement.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Please note that any information on supply chains does not meet the requirements of this metric and is covered under MSA Supply Chain Disclosure.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3056,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 67,
      "companies": 1817,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Organizational_structure_and_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5454288,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Project Just Brand",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Project_Just_Brand.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Project Just Brand",
      "question": "Has the brand been researched by Project JUST?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Research Document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 184,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 170,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Project_Just_Brand+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5456201,
      "name": "Core+Headquarters Location",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Headquarters_Location.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Headquarters Location",
      "question": "Where is the company headquarters located?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates)",
        "Afghanistan",
        "Ajman (United Arab Emirates)",
        "Alabama (United States)",
        "Åland Islands",
        "Alaska (United States)",
        "Albania",
        "Alberta (Canada)",
        "Algeria",
        "American Samoa",
        "Andaman and Nicobar Islands",
        "Andhra Pradesh",
        "Andorra",
        "Angola",
        "Anguilla",
        "Anhui (China)",
        "Antarctica",
        "Antigua and Barbuda",
        "Argentina",
        "Arizona (United States)",
        "Arkansas (United States)",
        "Armenia",
        "Aruba",
        "Arunachal Pradesh",
        "Assam",
        "Australia",
        "Austria",
        "Azerbaijan",
        "Bahamas",
        "Bahrain",
        "Bangladesh",
        "Barbados",
        "Beijing (China)",
        "Belarus",
        "Belgium",
        "Belize",
        "Benin",
        "Bermuda",
        "Bhutan",
        "Bihar",
        "Bolivia",
        "Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba",
        "Bosnia and Herzegovina",
        "Botswana",
        "Bouvet Island",
        "Brazil",
        "British Columbia (Canada)",
        "British Indian Ocean Territory",
        "British Virgin Islands",
        "Brunei Darussalam",
        "Bulgaria",
        "Burkina Faso",
        "Burundi",
        "California (United States)",
        "Cambodia",
        "Cameroon",
        "Canada",
        "Cape Verde",
        "Cayman Islands",
        "Central African Republic",
        "Chad",
        "Chandigarh",
        "Chhattisgarh",
        "Chile",
        "China",
        "Chongqing (China)",
        "Christmas Island",
        "Cocos (Keeling) Islands",
        "Colombia",
        "Colorado (United States)",
        "Comoros",
        "Congo",
        "Connecticut (United States)",
        "Cook Islands",
        "Costa Rica",
        "Côte d'Ivoire",
        "Croatia",
        "Cuba",
        "Curaçao",
        "Cyprus",
        "Czech Republic",
        "Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu",
        "Delaware (United States)",
        "Delhi",
        "Democratic Republic of the Congo",
        "Denmark",
        "District of Columbia (United States)",
        "Djibouti",
        "Dominica",
        "Dominican Republic",
        "Dubai (United Arab Emirates)",
        "Ecuador",
        "Egypt",
        "El Salvador",
        "Equatorial Guinea",
        "Eritrea",
        "Estonia",
        "Ethiopia",
        "Falkland Islands (Malvinas)",
        "Faroe Islands",
        "Fiji",
        "Finland",
        "Florida (United States)",
        "France",
        "French Guiana",
        "French Polynesia",
        "French Southern Territories",
        "Fujairah (United Arab Emirates)",
        "Fujian (China)",
        "Gabon",
        "Gambia",
        "Gansu (China)",
        "Georgia",
        "Georgia (United States)",
        "Germany",
        "Ghana",
        "Gibraltar",
        "Goa",
        "Greece",
        "Greenland",
        "Grenada",
        "Guadeloupe",
        "Guam",
        "Guangdong (China)",
        "Guangxi (China)",
        "Guatemala",
        "Guernsey",
        "Guinea",
        "Guinea-Bissau",
        "Guizhou (China)",
        "Gujarat",
        "Guyana",
        "Hainan (China)",
        "Haiti",
        "Haryana",
        "Hawaii (United States)",
        "Heard Island and McDonald Islands",
        "Hebei (China)",
        "Heilongjiang (China)",
        "Henan (China)",
        "Himachal Pradesh",
        "Holy See (Vatican City State)",
        "Honduras",
        "Hong Kong",
        "Hubei (China)",
        "Hunan (China)",
        "Hungary",
        "Iceland",
        "Idaho (United States)",
        "Illinois (United States)",
        "Indiana (United States)",
        "India",
        "Indonesia",
        "Inner Mongolia (China)",
        "Iowa (United States)",
        "Iran",
        "Iraq",
        "Ireland",
        "Isle of Man",
        "Israel",
        "Italy",
        "Jamaica",
        "Jammu and Kashmir",
        "Japan",
        "Jersey",
        "Jharkhand",
        "Jiangsu (China)",
        "Jiangxi (China)",
        "Jilin (China)",
        "Jordan",
        "Kansas (United States)",
        "Karnataka",
        "Kazakhstan",
        "Kentucky (United States)",
        "Kenya",
        "Kerala",
        "Kiribati",
        "Korea, Democratic People's Republic of",
        "Korea, Republic of",
        "Kosovo",
        "Kuwait",
        "Kyrgyzstan",
        "Ladakh",
        "Lakshadweep",
        "Laos",
        "Lao People's Democratic Republic",
        "Latvia",
        "Lebanon",
        "Lesotho",
        "Liaoning (China)",
        "Liberia",
        "Libya",
        "Liechtenstein",
        "Lithuania",
        "Louisiana (United States)",
        "Luxembourg",
        "Macao",
        "Macau (China)",
        "Madagascar",
        "Madhya Pradesh",
        "Maharashtra",
        "Maine (United States)",
        "Malawi",
        "Malaysia",
        "Maldives",
        "Mali",
        "Malta",
        "Manipur",
        "Manitoba (Canada)",
        "Marshall Islands",
        "Martinique",
        "Maryland (United States)",
        "Massachusetts (United States)",
        "Mauritania",
        "Mauritius",
        "Mayotte",
        "Meghalaya",
        "Mexico",
        "Michigan (United States)",
        "Micronesia, Federated States of",
        "Minnesota (United States)",
        "Mississippi (United States)",
        "Missouri (United States)",
        "Mizoram",
        "Moldova",
        "Monaco",
        "Mongolia",
        "Montana (United States)",
        "Montenegro",
        "Montserrat",
        "Morocco",
        "Mozambique",
        "Myanmar",
        "Nagaland",
        "Namibia",
        "Nauru",
        "Nebraska (United States)",
        "Nepal",
        "Netherlands",
        "Nevada (United States)",
        "New Brunswick (Canada)",
        "New Caledonia",
        "New Hampshire (United States)",
        "New Jersey (United States)",
        "New Mexico (United States)",
        "New York (United States)",
        "New Zealand",
        "Newfoundland and Labrador (Canada)",
        "Nicaragua",
        "Niger",
        "Nigeria",
        "Ningxia (China)",
        "Niue",
        "Norfolk Island",
        "North Carolina (United States)",
        "North Dakota (United States)",
        "North Macedonia",
        "Northern Mariana Islands",
        "Northwest Territories (Canada)",
        "Norway",
        "Nova Scotia (Canada)",
        "Nunavut (Canada)",
        "Odisha",
        "Ohio (United States)",
        "Oklahoma (United States)",
        "Oman",
        "Ontario, Canada",
        "Oregon (United States)",
        "Pakistan",
        "Palau",
        "Palestinian Territory",
        "Panama",
        "Papua New Guinea",
        "Paraguay",
        "Pennsylvania (United States)",
        "Peru",
        "Philippines",
        "Pitcairn",
        "Poland",
        "Portugal",
        "Prince Edward Island (Canada)",
        "Puducherry",
        "Puerto Rico",
        "Punjab",
        "Qatar",
        "Qinghai (China)",
        "Quebec (Canada)",
        "Ras Al-khaimah (United Arab Emirates)",
        "Rajasthan",
        "Réunion",
        "Rhode Island (United States)",
        "Romania",
        "Russia",
        "Rwanda",
        "Saint Barthélemy",
        "Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha",
        "Saint Kitts and Nevis",
        "Saint Lucia",
        "Saint Martin (French part)",
        "Saint Pierre and Miquelon",
        "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines",
        "Samoa",
        "San Marino",
        "Sao Tome and Principe",
        "Saskatchewan (Canada)",
        "Saudi Arabia",
        "Senegal",
        "Serbia",
        "Seychelles",
        "Shaanxi (China)",
        "Shandong (China)",
        "Shanghai (China)",
        "Shanxi (China)",
        "Sharjah (United Arab Emirates)",
        "Sichuan (China)",
        "Sierra Leone",
        "Sikkim",
        "Singapore",
        "Sint Maarten (Dutch part)",
        "Slovakia",
        "Slovenia",
        "Solomon Islands",
        "Somalia",
        "South Africa",
        "South Carolina (United States)",
        "South Dakota (United States)",
        "South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands",
        "South Sudan",
        "Spain",
        "Sri Lanka",
        "Sudan",
        "Suriname",
        "Svalbard and Jan Mayen",
        "Swaziland",
        "Sweden",
        "Switzerland",
        "Syrian Arab Republic",
        "Taiwan",
        "Tajikistan",
        "Tamil Nadu",
        "Tanzania",
        "Telangana",
        "Tennessee (United States)",
        "Texas (United States)",
        "Thailand",
        "Tianjin (China)",
        "Tibet (China)",
        "Timor-Leste",
        "Togo",
        "Tokelau",
        "Tonga",
        "Trinidad and Tobago",
        "Tripura",
        "Tunisia",
        "Turks and Caicos Islands",
        "Turkey",
        "Turkmenistan",
        "Tuvalu",
        "U.S. Virgin Islands",
        "Uganda",
        "Ukraine",
        "Umm Al-quwain (United Arab Emirates)",
        "United Arab Emirates",
        "United Kingdom",
        "United States",
        "United States Minor Outlying Islands",
        "Uruguay",
        "Utah (United States)",
        "Uttar Pradesh",
        "Uttarakhand",
        "Uzbekistan",
        "Vanuatu",
        "Venezuela",
        "Vermont (United States)",
        "Vietnam",
        "Virginia (United States)",
        "Wallis and Futuna",
        "Washington (United States)",
        "West Bengal",
        "West Virginia (United States)",
        "Western Sahara",
        "Wisconsin (United States)",
        "Wyoming (United States)",
        "Xinjiang (China)",
        "Yemen",
        "Yukon (Canada)",
        "Yunnan (China)",
        "Zambia",
        "Zhejiang (China)",
        "Zimbabwe"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 138730,
      "bookmarkers": 12,
      "datasets": 13,
      "companies": 138730,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Core+ILO_Region.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Core+Country.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Economic_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Country.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Headquarters_Location+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5458827,
      "name": "Core+Supplier List",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Supplier_List.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Supplier List",
      "question": "Does the company publish a public list of its suppliers names and addresses?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Certain companies publicly disclose a list of their suppliers. This list may also give additional information such as the supplier's address, country, product category, number of workers and tier of the supply chain.</p>\r\n<p>Publishing a supplier list increases a company's transparency and provides a channel through which the company can be alerted of any issues in their supply chain e.g. worker's rights violations, environmental non-compliance, or corruption.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"color: #34495e; background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\">This metric is asking whether or not the company you are researching publishes a list of its suppliers. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #34495e; background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\">The quickest way to find this information is to search online for the name of the company and 'supplier list'. The company may publish this list in a PDF file or directly on its website. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #34495e; background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\">The Open Apparel Registry is an open-source tool that maps garment facilities worldwide. If your company is part of the apparel industry, you can search for whether or not they disclose their suppliers on openapparel.org.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #34495e; background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\">The answer to this metric question may thus be : </span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"color: #0e101a; background: transparent; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\">\r\n<li style=\"color: #0e101a; background: transparent; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; ; list-style-type: disc;\"><span style=\"color: #34495e;\"><strong style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\">Yes, Tier 1 only. </span></strong><span style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\">The company publishes a list of suppliers, and it specifies that the list covers its Tier 1 suppliers. Consider Tier 1 if the list does not specify the Tier. </span></span></li>\r\n<li style=\"color: #0e101a; background: transparent; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; ; list-style-type: disc;\"><span style=\"color: #34495e;\"><strong style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\">Yes, Tier 1 &amp; 2.</span></strong><span style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"> The company publishes a list of suppliers, and it explicitly states that the list published covers its Tier 1 &amp; Tier 2 suppliers. </span></span></li>\r\n<li style=\"color: #0e101a; background: transparent; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; ; list-style-type: disc;\"><span style=\"color: #34495e;\"><strong style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\">Yes, all suppliers.</span></strong><span style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"> The company explicitly states that the list covers </span><strong style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\">all of its suppliers</span></strong><span style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\">. </span></span></li>\r\n<li style=\"color: #0e101a; background: transparent; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; ; list-style-type: disc;\"><span style=\"color: #34495e;\"><strong style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\">No.</span></strong><span style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"> No information on the company's suppliers was found.</span></span></li>\r\n<li style=\"color: #0e101a; background: transparent; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; ; list-style-type: disc;\"><span style=\"color: #34495e;\"><span style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\">Unknown answers should not be selected as an option</span></span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #34495e;\"><span style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\">Pay attention to the </span><strong style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\">publication date</span></strong><span style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"> of the list. Use the year of the publication date as the year for your value on Wikirate. </span><strong style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\">If there is no date, enter the current year.</span></strong><span style=\"background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"> </span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes, Tier 1 only",
        "Yes, Tier 1 & 2",
        "Yes, all suppliers",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 198,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 26,
      "companies": 147,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Supplier_List_all.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Supplier_List+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5458839,
      "name": "Commons+Supplier List (all)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Supplier_List_all.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Supplier List (all)",
      "question": "Does the company/brand share a public list of its suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var m2yes, m3yes;\n\n  m2yes = [\"Yes\", \"Partial\"];\n\n  m3yes = [\"Yes, Tier 1 only\", \"Yes, Tier 1 & 2\", \"Yes, all suppliers\"];\n\n  if (m1 > 0 || m2yes.includes(m2) || m3yes.includes(m3)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~2929009",
          "not_researched": "0",
          "unknown": "0"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5768854",
          "not_researched": "NR"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~5458827",
          "not_researched": "NR"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1106,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 13,
      "companies": 465,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Supplier_List_all+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5460043,
      "name": "Electronic Frontier Foundation+Transparent About Platform Policy Takedown Requests",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Transparent_About_Platform_Policy_Takedown_Requests.json",
      "designer": "Electronic Frontier Foundation",
      "title": "Transparent About Platform Policy Takedown Requests",
      "question": "Does the company report transparently on government platform policy takedown requests?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The </span><a href=\"https://www.eff.org/\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 1rem;\">Electronic Frontier Foundation</a><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">examines major tech companies’ content moderation policies in the midst of massive government pressure to censor, assessing companies annually in their </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\"Who Has Your Back\" report.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric focuses on the company's</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span>Transparency About Platform Policy Takedown Requests. To earn a star (Yes) in this category, the service provider must regularly publish records of content or account restrictions based upon identifiable government allegations of violations of the provider’s policies, such as Terms of Service or Community Standards, regardless of whether the request came through channels for government requests or through customer service channels. This includes government requests alleging facts that lead to a content or account restriction based on a provider's policies.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The provider’s reporting should include, at a minimum, the information necessary to determine:</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>the number of requests received, </li>\r\n<li>the country from which the request originated, and</li>\r\n<li>the number of requests acted upon and/or the number of posts removed or restricted or the number of accounts suspended, and</li>\r\n<li>for service providers reporting on multiple products/platforms, the product/platform associated with the requested content or account.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Reporting must distinguish legal takedown requests from platform policy takedown requests.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">A request is identifiably from a government if it is provided through official channels (such as an order issued by a competent judicial authority); if the requestor identifies themselves as a government official or relies upon their governmental position or authority; or if the provider otherwise is aware a government is being represented in the request.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">See EFF's most recent reports to find answers to this question:</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"https://www.eff.org/files/2019/06/11/whyb_2019_report.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><em style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Who Has Your Back? 2019</em></a></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"https://www.eff.org/files/2018/05/31/whyb_2018_report.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><em style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Who Has Your Back? 2018</em></a></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Star translations to metric categories: </p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>Full star = Yes</li>\r\n<li>No star = No</li>\r\n<li>Half star = Steps in the right direction</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Steps in the right direction"
      ],
      "report_type": "Research Document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Transparent_About_Platform_Policy_Takedown_Requests+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5460558,
      "name": "Electronic Frontier Foundation+Provides Meaningful Notice",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Provides_Meaningful_Notice.json",
      "designer": "Electronic Frontier Foundation",
      "title": "Provides Meaningful Notice",
      "question": "Does the service provider publicly commit to provide meaningful notice to users of every removal and suspension?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The </span><a href=\"https://www.eff.org/\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 1rem;\">Electronic Frontier Foundation</a><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">examines major tech companies’ content moderation policies in the midst of massive government pressure to censor, assessing companies annually in their </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\"Who Has Your Back\" report.</span></p>\r\n<p>Provides Meaningful Notice To earn a star in this category, the service provider must publicly commit to provide meaningful notice to users of every removal and suspension, unless prohibited by law, in very narrow and defined emergency situations,* or if doing so would be futile or ineffective**.</p>\r\n<p>For legal takedowns and suspensions, the notice must (1) identify the specific content that allegedly violates the law, and (2) inform the user that it was a legal takedown request. If the takedown is a “geoblock”—that is, a content restriction limited to the jurisdiction where the provider is legally required to restrict it—then the users must also be notified of the geographic scope of the takedown. For policy takedowns and suspensions, this notice must (1) identify the specific content that allegedly violates a provider policy, and (2) include the specific provider policy the content allegedly violates.</p>\r\n<p>*<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> The exceptions should not be broader than the emergency exceptions provided in the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC § 2702 (b)(8): “if the provider, in good faith, believes that an emergency involving danger of death or serious physical injury to any person requires disclosure without delay of communications relating to the emergency[.]” </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">** An example of a futile scenario would be if a user’s account has been compromised or their mobile device stolen, and informing the “user“ would concurrently—or only—inform the attacker.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">See EFF's most recent reports to find answers to this question:</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"https://www.eff.org/files/2019/06/11/whyb_2019_report.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><em style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Who Has Your Back? 2019</em></a></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"https://www.eff.org/files/2018/05/31/whyb_2018_report.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><em style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Who Has Your Back? 2018</em></a></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Star translations to metric categories: </p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>Full star = Yes</li>\r\n<li>No star = No</li>\r\n<li>Half star = Steps in the right direction</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Steps in the right direction"
      ],
      "report_type": "Research Document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Provides_Meaningful_Notice+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5460573,
      "name": "Electronic Frontier Foundation+Appeals Mechanisms",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Appeals_Mechanisms.json",
      "designer": "Electronic Frontier Foundation",
      "title": "Appeals Mechanisms",
      "question": "Does the service provider publicly commit to provide users with an appeals process and be transparent about the results of that process?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The </span><a href=\"https://www.eff.org/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 1rem;\">Electronic Frontier Foundation</a><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">examines major tech companies’ content moderation policies in the midst of massive government pressure to censor, assessing companies annually in their </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\"Who Has Your Back\" report.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric focuses on the company's</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Appeals Mechanisms. </span>To earn a star (Yes) in this category, the service provider must publicly commit to provide users with an appeals process and be transparent about the results of that process.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This appeals process must provide users with effective mechanisms to appeal all provider-policy based content and account restriction decisions, including during temporary suspensions. Upon a successful appeal, the account or material must be reinstated promptly.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">See EFF's most recent reports to find answers to this question:</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"https://www.eff.org/files/2019/06/11/whyb_2019_report.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><em style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Who Has Your Back? 2019</em></a></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"https://www.eff.org/files/2018/05/31/whyb_2018_report.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><em style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Who Has Your Back? 2018</em></a></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Star translations to metric categories: </p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\r\n<li>Full star = Yes</li>\r\n<li>No star = No</li>\r\n<li>Half star = Steps in the right direction</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Steps in the right direction"
      ],
      "report_type": "Research Document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation+Appeals_Mechanisms+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5460660,
      "name": "Sussex Research Group+Right to Erasure of Personal Data",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sussex_Research_Group+Right_to_Erasure_of_Personal_Data.json",
      "designer": "Sussex Research Group",
      "title": "Right to Erasure of Personal Data",
      "question": "Does the company give its users the right to have their personal data erased, and if so does this extend to its global operations or only users in Europe? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The <a href=\"https://eugdpr.org/\">EU General Data Protection Regulation</a> (GDPR) came into force on the 25th of May 2018. The regulation aims to give individuals control over their personal data by enforcing rules concerning data protection, privacy and the transfer of personal data outside of the EU and EEA areas. </p>\r\n<p>GDPR Article 17 states that 'The data subject shall have the right to obtain from the data controller the erasure of personal data concerning him or her without undue delay'. This is known as '<strong>the Right to Erasure</strong>' or '<strong>the Right to be Forgotten</strong>'.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This question is asking whether the company gives its users the right to have their personal data erased. This is known as '<strong>the Right to Erasure</strong>' or '<strong>the Right to be Forgotten</strong>'. </p>\r\n<p>This information can be found in the company's privacy policy. Search the company's privacy policy for keywords such as '<strong>erase</strong>', '<strong>erasure</strong>', '<strong>delete</strong>' and '<strong>forgotten</strong>'.</p>\r\n<p>The company may also have a page which specifically addresses their GDPR policies. </p>\r\n<p>If the company clearly states that it does provide its users with the right to have their personal data erased and they state that this only covers its operations in Europe select '<strong>Yes, Europe</strong>'.</p>\r\n<p>If the company clearly states that its users have the right to have their personal data erased and states that this covers their users globally select '<strong>Yes, Global</strong>'. </p>\r\n<p>If the company does not clearly state in their privacy policy that it gives users the right to erasure, select '<strong>No</strong>'.</p>\r\n<p>Please note, '<strong>Unknown</strong>' is not a possible option because the company <em>must</em> set out their data processing procedures in their privacy policy. If the company has no privacy policy select '<strong>No</strong>' as the answer option. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes, Global",
        "Yes, Europe only",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sussex_Research_Group+Right_to_Erasure_of_Personal_Data+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5467295,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Number of garments produced annually",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Number_of_garments_produced_annually.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Number of garments produced annually",
      "question": "How many garments does the brand make annually?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a robust methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the <strong>Business Model</strong> category of questions, focusing on the size of the business and its operations; how many employees, annual revenue, the type of business model, and so on.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Use publicly available reports from the brand OR third-party reported information for the</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Project JUST category: </span><a href=\"/PJ_Categories\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">Size and Business Model</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> to answer this question. Visit the brand’s website or conduct a browser search to find a Corporate Responsibility Report, or any information on their CSR or sustainability policies.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Keywords and search terms: <strong>product</strong>, <strong>garment</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>Some companies report this information clearly, [[Project_Just_Research_Group+Number_of_garments_produced_annually+Benetton_Group_Spa+2018|<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">see this Benetton </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">example]]. If you are unable to find the number reported, click “Unknown” for the correct year you are researching, and submit.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Garments",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 225,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 33,
      "companies": 128,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Business_Model_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Number_of_garments_produced_annually+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5467309,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Number of apparel collections produced annually",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Number_of_apparel_collections_produced_annually.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Number of apparel collections produced annually",
      "question": "How many collections does the brand release annually?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a robust methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Business Model</span> category of questions, focusing on the size of the business and its operations; how many employees, annual revenue, the type of business model, and so on.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Use publicly available reports from the brand OR third-party reported information for the</span> Project JUST category: <a href=\"/PJ_Categories\" target=\"_blank\">Size and Business Model</a> to answer this question. Visit the brand’s website or conduct a browser search to find a Corporate Responsibility Report, or any information on their CSR or sustainability policies. <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The company may include a list of their collections on their website. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong>Keywords</strong> and search terms include: <strong>Collection</strong>, <strong>Line</strong>. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Some companies report this information clearly, see this Benetton [[http://www.benettongroup.com/media-press/image-gallery/collections/|example]]. If you are unable to find the number reported, click “Unknown” for the correct year you are researching, and submit.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Collections",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 351,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 36,
      "companies": 138,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Wollongong_Research_Group_2020+Wollongong_2020_Climate_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Business_Model_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Number_of_apparel_collections_produced_annually+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5467323,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Sustainable lead times",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Sustainable_lead_times.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Sustainable lead times",
      "question": "Does the brand have policies in place to ensure reasonable lead times and reasonable and sustainable order placement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a robust methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the <strong>Social</strong> section of questions, which looks at how a brand is treating the people in its supply chain. </span></p>\r\n<p>Reasonable lead times ensure that suppliers can fulfill contracted orders without incurring excessive overtime or otherwise increasing their risk of worker abuse. Reasonable and sustainable order placement also reduces risk of worker abuse by allowing suppliers to responsibly schedule shifts and product output, as well as payroll and other expenses.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Use publicly available reports from the brand OR third-party reported information for the</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Project JUST category</span>: [[PJ Categories|Social]] to answer this question. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Visit the brand’s website or conduct a browser search to find</span> Annual, Integrated, CR Reports, <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">policies, statements or </span>codes that address sustainable lead times.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once an answer is found, select one of the below answer options for the correct year you are researching, and submit.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and there is third party evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and the brand provides evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and the brand does not provide evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and there is third party evidence of non-compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- No</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Unknown is only a correct answer if no reporting on the brand is found.</span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes, and there is third party evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and the brand provides evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and the brand does not provide evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and there is third party evidence of non-compliance",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 198,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 31,
      "companies": 123,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Sustainable_lead_times+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5467337,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Stable price guarantee (suppliers)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Stable_price_guarantee_suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Stable price guarantee (suppliers)",
      "question": "Is a stable price guaranteed to suppliers regardless of world price fluctuation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing.</p>\r\n<p>To do so, they developed a robust methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices.</p>\r\n<p>While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </p>\r\n<p>This metric falls within the <strong>Social</strong> section of questions, which looks at how a brand is treating the people in its supply chain. </p>\r\n<p>This metric is asking whether the brand offers any written guarantee that they will pay suppliers a set price per unit for product, even if exchange rates or commodity prices fluctuate on a global scale. The stability that a guaranteed price provides suppliers means that they can plan to cover their own costs consistently, which reduces the risk of worker exploitation.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Use publicly available reports from the brand OR third-party reported information for the</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Project JUST category:</span> [[PJ Categories|Social]] to answer this question. <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Visit the brand’s website or conduct a browser search to find</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Annual, Integrated, CR Reports, </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">policies, statements or </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">codes that address</span> supplier price guarantees.</p>\r\n<p>Once found, select either the 'Yes' or 'No' answer option for the correct year you are researching, and submit.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Visit the brand’s website or conduct a browser search to find</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Annual, Integrated, CR Reports, </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">policies, statements or </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">codes that address</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 198,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 31,
      "companies": 122,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Stable_price_guarantee_suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5467351,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Subcontracting policy (supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Subcontracting_policy_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Subcontracting policy (supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the brand have a policy that addresses subcontracting in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a robust methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Social</span> section of questions, which looks at how a brand is treating the people in its supply chain. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Use publicly available reports from the brand OR third-party reported information for the</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Project JUST category: </span>[[PJ Categories|Social]] to answer this question. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Visit the brand’s website or conduct a browser search to find a Corporate Responsibility Report, or any information on their CSR or sustainability policies that</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> address</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> subcontracting in the supply chain.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once an answer is found, select one of the below answer options for the correct year you are researching, and submit.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and there is third party evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and the brand provides evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and the brand does not provide evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and there is third party evidence of non-compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- No</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Unknown is only a correct answer if no reporting on the brand is found.</span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes, and there is third party evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and the brand provides evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and the brand does not provide evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and there is third party evidence of non-compliance",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 203,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 31,
      "companies": 125,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Subcontracting_policy_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5467365,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Freedom of association (supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Freedom_of_association_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Freedom of association (supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the brand address, or have a code, that addresses freedom of association in its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a robust methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Social</span> section of questions, which looks at how a brand is treating the people in its supply chain. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Use publicly available reports from the brand OR third-party reported information for the</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Project JUST category</span>: [[PJ Categories|Social]] to answer this question. Conduct a browser search or v</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">isit the brand’s website to find Annual, Integrated or CR Reports and to find policies, statements, or commitments that reference a Code addressing freedom of association.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once found, select one of the below answer options for the correct year you are researching, and submit.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and there is third party evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and the brand provides evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and the brand does not provide evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and there is third party evidence of non-compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- No</span></p>\r\n<p>Unknown is only a correct answer when no reporting on the brand is found.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes, and there is third party evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and the brand provides evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and the brand does not provide evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and there is third party evidence of non-compliance",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 205,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 31,
      "companies": 128,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Freedom_of_association_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5467379,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Rights to collective bargaining (supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Rights_to_collective_bargaining_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Rights to collective bargaining (supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the brand address, or have a code that addresses, rights to collective bargaining in its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a robust methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Social</span> section of questions, which looks at how a brand is treating the people in its supply chain. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Use publicly available reports from the brand OR third-party reported information for the</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Project JUST category:</span> [[PJ Categories|Social]] to answer this question. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Visit the brand’s website or conduct a browser search to find Annual, Integrated, CR Reports, policies, statements, or commitments that reference a code, and/or a Code addressing rights to collective bargaining.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once the answer is found, select one of the below answer options for the correct year you are researching, and submit.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and there is third party evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and the brand provides evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and the brand does not provide evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and there is third party evidence of non-compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- No</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Unknown is only a correct answer if no reporting on the brand is found.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes, and there is third party evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and the brand provides evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and the brand does not provide evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and there is third party evidence of non-compliance",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 265,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 39,
      "companies": 157,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Rights_to_collective_bargaining_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5467393,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Prohibit regular excessive overtime (supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Prohibit_regular_excessive_overtime_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Prohibit regular excessive overtime (supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the brand address, or have a code that addresses, prohibiting regular excessive overtime in their supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a well-regarded methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Social</span> section of questions, which looks at how a brand is treating the people in its supply chain.</span></p>\r\n<p>The <a href=\"https://www.ethicaltrade.org/eti-base-code/6-working-hours-are-not-excessive\">Ethical Trading Initiative</a> and the <a href=\"https://www.fairlabor.org/our-work/code-of-conduct#targetText=Hours%20of%20Work&amp;targetText=The%20regular%20work%20week%20shall,work%20at%20a%20premium%20rate.\">Fair Labor Association</a> stipulate that employers must comply with national laws on overtime. Working hours, excluding overtime, must be limited to 8 hours a days, 48 hours per week. Apart from in exceptional circumstances, working hours <strong>should not exceed 60 hours per week</strong> (12 hours of overtime on top of the 48-hour working week). Workers should also be given one day off in each 7-day period, or 2 days off within each 14 day period. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Use publicly available reports from the brand OR third-party reported information for the</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Project JUST category</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">:</span> [[PJ Categories|Social]] to answer this question. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Visit the brand’s website or conduct a browser search to find a Corporate Responsibility Report, or any information on their CSR or sustainability policies that</span> address </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">prohibiting excessive overtime.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once an answer is found, select one of the below answer options for the correct year you are researching, and submit.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and there is third party evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and the brand provides evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and the brand does not provide evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and there is third party evidence of non-compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- No</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Unknown is only a correct answer if no reporting on the brand is found.</span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes, and there is third party evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and the brand provides evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and the brand does not provide evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and there is third party evidence of non-compliance",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 238,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 33,
      "companies": 126,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Prohibit_regular_excessive_overtime_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5467407,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Code of conduct included in supplier contracts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Code_of_conduct_included_in_supplier_contracts.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Code of conduct included in supplier contracts",
      "question": "Is a code of conduct included in supplier contracts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a robust methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Social</span> section of questions, which looks at how a brand is treating the people in its supply chain. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Use publicly available reports from the brand OR third-party reported information for the Project JUST category: [[PJ Categories|Social]] to answer this question.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Check the brand’s website to find policies, statements or commitments that state the brand <strong>includes a code of conduct in supplier contracts</strong>. If the company publishes a Modern Slavery Act statement, this can sometimes be found there. In order to anser \"Yes\" to this question, the <strong>company must explicitly state</strong> the inclusion of CoCs in supplier contracts or purchasing agreements. If the company states that it \"requires all suppliers to comply with its Code of Conduct\" this is insufficient for a Yes answer. Example of a Yes answer is: \"our contractual process requires every service provider to agree that all of their business dealings will be in alignment with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (p. 5 [[https://wikirate.org/Source_000088323|source]])</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Unknown is only a correct answer where a supplier or vendor Code of Conduct is not found. Otherwise select 'Yes' or 'No' accordingly.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 213,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 32,
      "companies": 128,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Code_of_conduct_included_in_supplier_contracts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5467442,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Renewable energy use (supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Renewable_energy_use_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Renewable energy use (supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the brand use renewable energy at any stage of the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a robust methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">Environment</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> category, which covers key measurable aspects of environmental sustainability for a fashion retail brand, from material impact to energy and waste conservation. Many of the answers to these questions can be found in a brand’s annual CSR report or in other publicly accessible publications. However, please note that a few of the others may require more indepth research or even a company-insider’s input.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Researchers will need to look through information about a brand that is publicly available, either self-reported OR third-party reported information for the Project JUST category: [[PJ Categories|<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Environment]]</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">We suggest familiarizing yourself with the brand’s reporting by visiting the brand’s website, Annual, Integrated or CR Reports, or any information on their CSR or sustainability policies to find information about the brand's renewable energy use. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">As the question applies to the company's supply chain, the answer may be found in a separate policy document. Use keyword searches (Renewable, Energy, Suppliers) to find the answer.</span></strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Select:<br></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><em><strong><span style=\"background-color: #bfedd2;\">Yes, at all locations/facilities</span> - </strong></em>If the company mentions renewable energy is used in <strong>ALL locations/facilitites</strong> of its supply chain.</span></span></li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong><em><span style=\"background-color: #bfedd2;\">Yes, but only at some locations/facilities</span>- </em></strong></span></span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company mentions renewable energy is used in <strong>SPECIFIC</strong> locations/facilitites of its supply chain. </span></span></li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong><em><span style=\"background-color: #bfedd2;\">No-</span> </em></strong></span></span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company explixitly states it <strong>DOES NOT USE</strong> renewable energy in the supply chain. </span></span></span></li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; background-color: #bfedd2;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; background-color: #bfedd2;\"><strong><em>Uknown- </em></strong></span></span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If you <strong>cannot find information</strong> on renewable energy use in the supply chain </span></span></span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Submit an answer by selecting one of the answer options and clicking <span style=\"background-color: #bfedd2;\"><strong>Submit</strong></span>.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes, at all locations/facilities",
        "Yes, but only at some locations/facilities",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 33,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Renewable_energy_use_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5467456,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Sustainable material use (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Sustainable_material_use.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Sustainable material use (%)",
      "question": "What percentage of the brand's overall material use is labelled sustainable or renewable?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a robust methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">Environment</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> category, which covers key measurable aspects of environmental sustainability for a fashion retail brand, from material impact to energy and waste conservation. Many of the answers to these questions can be found in a brand’s annual CSR report or in other publicly accessible publications. However, please note that a few of the others may require more indepth research or even a company-insider’s input.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This addresses whether the brand goes above and beyond simply sourcing and utilizing readily available sustainable fabrics and trims, and rather actively partakes in textile/trim experimentation internally or through partnerships with textile mills and labs.<br><br>Researchers will need to comb through all information about a brand that is publicly available, either self-reported OR third-party reported information for the Project JUST category: [[PJ Categories|<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Environment]]</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In researching this question, we suggest familiarizing yourself with the brand’s reporting by visiting the brand’s website, looking to see if they have released a Corporate Responsibility Report, or any information on their CSR or sustainability policies. Keyword search “material” and “renewable” in key reports.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If you are unable to find the number reported, click “Unknown” for the correct year you are researching, and submit.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 11,
      "companies": 18,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Sustainable_material_use+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5467470,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Forced labour remediation policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Forced_labour_remediation_policy.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Forced labour remediation policy",
      "question": "If forced labour is discovered, does the brand facilitate the individual’s reintegration into the labour market?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a robust methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Social</span> section of questions, which looks at how a brand is treating the people in its supply chain. </span></p>\r\n<p>If forced labor is identified, there is a responsibility to provide support services to the individual to help them get back on their feet and find legitimate work alternatives. This can be accomplished directly or indirectly. Indicate whether the brand addresses reintegration for individuals released from forced labor, providing them with support to find safe alternative work opportunities.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Use publicly available reports from the brand OR third-party reported information for the</span> Project JUST category: [[PJ Categories|Social]] to answer this question. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Visit the brand’s website or conduct a browser search to find Annual, Integrated, CR Reports, policies or statements that cover a forced labour remediation policy.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once an answer is found, select one of the below answer options for the correct year you are researching, and submit.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, at all locations/facilities (HQ, Stores, Distro centres, all supplier tiers)</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, but only Tier 1 Suppliers</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, but only at Tier 1 &amp; 2 Suppliers</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, but only all Supplier Tiers</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, but only at HQ/Stores/Distribution Centers</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- No</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Unknown is only a correct answer if no reporting on the brand is found.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes, at all locations/facilities (HQ, Stores, Distro centres, all supplier tiers)",
        "Yes, but only Tier 1 Suppliers",
        "Yes, but only at Tier 1 & 2 Suppliers",
        "Yes, but only all Supplier Tiers",
        "Yes, but only at HQ/Stores/Distribution Centres",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Forced_labour_remediation_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5467484,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Child labour remediation policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Child_labour_remediation_policy.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Child labour remediation policy",
      "question": "If child labour is discovered, does the brand find a way to provide for the child’s education and replace lost income to the family?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a robust methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Social</span> section of questions, which looks at how a brand is treating the people in its supply chain. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If child labor is identified, there is a responsibility to not only remove the child from the labor situation, but also to provide support to help the child with things like missed education and safety from being forced back into a similar situation. This can be accomplished directly or through local partnerships. This metric is asking whether the brand addresses education gaps for child laborers and actively searches for alternate means for the child’s family to replace the lost income, so that the child is not at risk of being sent to work elsewhere.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Use publicly available reports from the brand OR third-party reported information for the</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Project JUST category</span>: [[PJ Categories|Social]] to answer this question. W</span>e suggest familiarizing yourself with the brand’s reporting by visiting the brand’s website, looking to see if they have released a Corporate Responsibility Report, or any information on their CSR or sustainability policies.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Keyword search “<strong>child labor</strong>” and “<strong>remediation</strong>” in reports and policy documents. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company has published supplier policies, but does not cover child labor remediation, the answer will be \"No\".</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Child_labour_remediation_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5467750,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Migrant worker protection policy (supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Migrant_worker_protection_policy_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Migrant worker protection policy (supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the brand have policies in place to protect migrant workers in their supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a well-regarded methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Social</span> section of questions, which looks at how a brand is treating the people in its supply chain. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">A migrant worker is a person who moves from place to place to get work; a person who either migrates within their home country or outside of it to pursue work, such as seasonal work. This metric is asking whether the brand specifically addresses migrant workers in their supplier policies, assuming that this is a salient issue for the brand.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Use publicly available reports from the brand OR third-party reported information for the</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Project JUST category:</span> [[PJ Categories|Social]]. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Visit the brand’s website or conduct a browser search to find a Corporate Responsibility Report, or any information on their CSR or sustainability policies that</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> address migrant worker protection in the supply chain.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once an answer is found, select one of the below answer options for the correct year you are researching, and submit.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and there is third party evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and the brand provides evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and the brand does not provide evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and there is third party evidence of non-compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- No</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Unknown is only a correct answer if no reporting on the brand is found.</span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes, and there is third party evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and the brand provides evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and the brand does not provide evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and there is third party evidence of non-compliance",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Migrant_worker_protection_policy_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5467764,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Grievance resolution mechanism (supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Grievance_resolution_mechanism_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Grievance resolution mechanism (supply chain)",
      "question": "Is there a mechanism in place to resolve any issues workers report?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a well-regarded methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Social</span> section of questions, which looks at how a brand is treating the people in its supply chain. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Use publicly available reports from the brand OR third-party reported information for the</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Project JUST category</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">:</span> [[PJ Categories|Social]] to answer this question. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Visit the brand’s website or conduct a browser search to find</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Annual, Integrated, CR Reports,</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> policies, statements or </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">codes that </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">report on the company's grievance mechanism.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once an answer is found, select one of the below answer options for the correct year you are researching, and submit.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and there is third party evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and the brand provides evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and the brand does not provide evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and there is third party evidence of non-compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- No</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Unknown is only a correct answer if no reporting on the brand is found.</span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes, and there is third party evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and the brand provides evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and the brand does not provide evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and there is third party evidence of non-compliance",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Grievance_resolution_mechanism_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5468183,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Supplier country disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Supplier_country_disclosure.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Supplier country disclosure",
      "question": "Does the brand share the countries its suppliers are located in?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a robust methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the <strong>Transparency and Traceability</strong> category, which focuses on how open a brand is about communicating about its supply chain, and its social and environmental impact. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Researchers will need to comb through all information about a brand that is publicly available, either self-reported OR third-party reported information for the Project JUST category: Transparency and Traceability</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">We suggest familiarizing yourself with the brand’s reporting by visiting the brand’s website, </span>as well as searching on openapparel.org, and conducting a web search for the brand's supplier lists<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span>If you find the brand publishes a list of its suppliers, most of the time the brands will indicate at which level these are.<br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The following categorical answer options are designed to cover all possible answers to this question - i.e. Unknown is never a correct answer. If a brand does publish supplier countries, but does not indicate at which level, select \"only Tier 1\". Once the answer is found, select one of the below for the correct year you are researching, and submit.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, at all locations/facilities (HQ, Stores, Distro centres, all supplier tiers)</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, but only Tier 1 Suppliers</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, but only Tier 1 &amp; 2 Suppliers</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, but only all Supplier Tiers</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, but only HQ/Stores/Distribution Centers</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- No</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes, at all locations/facilities (HQ, Stores, Distribution centres, all supplier tiers)",
        "Yes, but only Tier 1 Suppliers",
        "Yes, but only Tier 1 & 2 Suppliers",
        "Yes, but only all Supplier Tiers",
        "Yes, but only HQ/Stores/Distribution Centers",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Supplier_country_disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5468197,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Existence of labour standards code",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Existence_of_labour_standards_code.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Existence of labour standards code",
      "question": "Does the brand have a code that addresses labour standards?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a robust methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the <strong>Social</strong> section of questions, which looks at how a brand is treating the people in its supply chain. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Use publicly available reports from the brand OR third-party reported information</span> for the Project JUST category: [[PJ Categories|Social]] to answer this question. </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">We suggest familiarizing yourself with the brand’s reporting by visiting the brand’s website, or Annual, Integrated or CR Reports to find </span>any policies, statements or commitments that reference a code, and/or a Code<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> addressing labor standards.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The following categorical answer options are designed to cover all possible answers to this question - i.e. Unknown is never a correct answer. Once found, select one of the below answer options for the correct year you are researching, and submit.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and there is third party evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and the brand provides evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and the brand does not provide evidence of compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Yes, and there is third party evidence of non-compliance</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- No</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes, and there is third party evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and the brand provides evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and the brand does not provide evidence of compliance",
        "Yes, and there is third party evidence of non-compliance",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Existence_of_labour_standards_code+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5468211,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Material innovation investment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Material_innovation_investment.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Material innovation investment",
      "question": "Does the brand invest in any material innovation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a robust methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">Environment</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> category, which covers key measurable aspects of environmental sustainability for a fashion retail brand, from material impact to energy and waste conservation. Many of the answers to these questions can be found in a brand’s annual CSR report or in other publicly accessible publications. However, please note that a few of the others may require more indepth research or even a company-insider’s input.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric addresses whether the brand goes above and beyond simply sourcing and utilizing readily available sustainable fabrics and trims, and rather actively partakes in textile/trim experimentation internally or through partnerships with textile mills and labs.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This addresses whether the brand goes above and beyond simply sourcing and utilizing readily available sustainable fabrics and trims, and rather actively partakes in textile/trim experimentation internally or through partnerships with textile mills and labs.<br><br>Researchers will need to comb through all information about a brand that is publicly available, either self-reported OR third-party reported information for the Project JUST category: [[PJ Categories|<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Environment]]</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">We suggest familiarizing yourself with the brand’s reporting by visiting the brand’s website, Annual, Integrated or CR Reports, or any information on their CSR or sustainability policies to find information about the brand's investments in material innovation. Examples of investment in material innovation include:</p>\r\n<table border=\"1\" style=\"border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; height: 516px;\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 23px;\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 4.16667%; height: 23px;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 23px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Raw Materials</span></td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 23px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Processing</span></td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 23px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Cut - Make - Trim</span></td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 23px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Retail &amp; Use</span></td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 23px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">End of Use</span></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 45px;\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 4.16667%; height: 45px;\">Textile</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\">Biosynthetics e.g. PLA, PHA</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\">Microbial Dye/ Fixing</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\">Additive Manufacturing</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\">Circular Business Models</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\">Chemical Recycling</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 45px;\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 4.16667%; height: 45px;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\">Regenerated Firbres e.g. algae, chitin</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\">Plasma, Ultrasonic, Nano, Foam, CO2</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\">Automation</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\">Customization Solutions</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\">Automated Sorting</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 67px;\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 4.16667%; height: 67px;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\">Man-made Cellulosics</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\">Pre-Treatment: (e.g. Enzymes, Cationic)</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\">Mass Customization</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\">Visualization Solutions (e.g. virtual fitting)</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\">Mechanical Recycling</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 67px;\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 4.16667%; height: 67px;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\">Natural Fibres e.g. wood, bast, agri waste</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\">Digital Printing, Laser Finishing</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\">Zero Waste Manufacturing</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\">Microfibre Solutions</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\"> </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 45px;\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 4.16667%; height: 45px;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\">Regenerative Agriculture</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\">Plant-Based Dyes &amp; Pigments</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\">Optimized Yarn &amp; Fabric Construction</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\"> </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 45px;\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 4.16667%; height: 45px;\">Leather</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\">Lab-Based Leather</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\">Alternative Tanning, Preservation</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\">Recycled Leather</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 67px;\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 4.16667%; height: 67px;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\">Plant/Fungi/Fish \"Leathers\" Alternatives</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\"> </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 45px;\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 4.16667%; height: 45px;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\">Cross-Supply Chain Innovations</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 45px;\"> </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 67px;\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 4.16667%; height: 67px;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\">Transparency</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\">Traceability</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\">Worker Empowerment</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\">Supply Chain Redesign</td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.6667%; height: 67px;\">Warehousing, Transport &amp; Packaging</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Table: Investment in innovative technologies and processes in fashion. Source: Fashion for Good's \"<a href=\"https://d2be5ept72nvlo.cloudfront.net/2019/10/FashionForGood_Investment.pdf\">Investing in Textile Innovation Report</a>\"</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The categorical answer options Yes and No are designed to cover all possible answers to this question - i.e. Unknown is never a correct answer. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Material_innovation_investment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5468225,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Retail stores",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Retail_stores.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Retail stores",
      "question": "How many physical retail stores does the brand have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a robust methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the <strong>Business Model</strong> category of questions, focusing on the size of the business and its operations; how many employees, annual revenue, the type of business model, and so on.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Researchers will need to comb through all the information about a brand that is publicly available, either self-reported OR third-party reported information for the <a href=\"/PJ_Categories\">Project JUST category</a>: Size and Business Model.  </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In researching this question, we suggest familiarizing yourself with the brand’s reporting by visiting the brand’s website, looking to see if they have released a CR Report, or any information on their CSR or sustainability policies. Keyword search “store” and “retail” in key reports.</p>\r\n<p>Some companies report this information clearly, see this Benetton [[http://www.benettongroup.com/sustainability/integrated-report/|example]]. If you are unable to find the number reported, click “Unknown” for the correct year you are researching, and submit.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Stores",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 334,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 23,
      "companies": 137,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Wollongong_Research_Group_2020+Wollongong_2020_Climate_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Business_Model_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Retail_stores+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5629440,
      "name": "Isabela Botero+Female workers' pay (as a percentage of male workers' pay)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Isabela_Botero+Female_workers_pay_as_a_percentage_of_male_workers_pay.json",
      "designer": "Isabela Botero",
      "title": "Female workers' pay (as a percentage of male workers' pay)",
      "question": "How much female workers are pay",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "percentage ",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Isabela_Botero+Female_workers_pay_as_a_percentage_of_male_workers_pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5645712,
      "name": "Principles for Responsible Investment+PRI Signatory",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Principles_for_Responsible_Investment+PRI_Signatory.json",
      "designer": "Principles for Responsible Investment",
      "title": "PRI Signatory",
      "question": "Is the company a signatory of the Principles for Responsible Investment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The <a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/\">PRI</a> is a UN supported organisation which works to understand the investment implications of ESG factors and to support its network of investor signatories to incorporate these factors into their investment and ownership decisions.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The six Principles for Responsible Investment are a voluntary and aspirational set of investment principles that offer a menu of possible actions for incorporating ESG issues into investment practice.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Principle 1: We will incorporate ESG issues into investment analysis and decision-making processes.</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Principle 2: We will be active owners and incorporate ESG issues into our ownership policies and practices.</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Principle 3: We will seek appropriate disclosure on ESG issues by the entities in which we invest.</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Principle 4: We will promote acceptance and implementation of the Principles within the investment industry.</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Principle 5: We will work together to enhance our effectiveness in implementing the Principles.</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Principle 6: We will each report on our activities and progress towards implementing the Principles.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Principles for Responsible Investment signatories are divided into three categories: Asset Owners, Investment Managers and Service Providers.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To find out which PRI category the company you are researching falls under, search the <a href=\"https://www.unpri.org/searchresults?qkeyword=&amp;parametrics=WVSECTION%7cSignatories\">PRI signatory database</a>. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company can be found in the signatory database, <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">enter the PRI category that the company has been assigned </span>and add/cite the company's signatory database page as a source.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company cannot be found in the signatory database, enter '<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">No</span>' and add/cite the signatory database as a source. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">'</span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">Unknown</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">' is not a possible answer for this metric question. </span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - Asset Owner",
        "Yes - Investment Manager",
        "Yes - Service Provider",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Signatory List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 26186,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 5157,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Industry.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Financial_Services_Sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Principles_for_Responsible_Investment+PRI_Signatory+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5661570,
      "name": "Global Organic Textile Standard+GOTS Certification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Organic_Textile_Standard+GOTS_Certification.json",
      "designer": "Global Organic Textile Standard",
      "title": "GOTS Certification",
      "question": "In which product categories does the company hold GOTS certifications?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) is recognised as the world's leading processing standard for textiles made from organic fibres. It defines high-level environmental criteria along the entire organic textiles supply chain and requires compliance with social criteria as well.<br><br>Only textile products that contain a minimum of 70% organic fibres can become GOTS certified. All chemical inputs such as dyestuffs and auxiliaries used must meet certain environmental and toxicological criteria. The choice of accessories is limited in accordance with ecological aspects as well. A functional waste water treatment plant is mandatory for any wet-processing unit involved and all processors must comply with social criteria. The key criteria of GOTS, its quality assurance system and the principles of the review and revision procedure are summarised in this section.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.global-standard.org/the-standard.html\">https://www.global-standard.org/the-standard.html</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>---------</p>\r\n<p><strong>You can find the details about the specific product that has been certified in the comments.</strong></p>\r\n<p>---------</p>\r\n<p>The following criteria are applied to the GOTS Version 5.0 certification:</p>\r\n<p>The consensus of the Founding Organizations was that a clear and unambiguous understanding of the content required that the Global Standard itself focuses on compulsory criteria only. The standard covers the processing, manufacturing, packaging, labelling, trading and distribution of all textiles made from at least 70% certified organic natural fibres. The final products may include, but are not limited to fibre products, yarns, fabrics, clothes and home textiles. The standard does not set criteria for leather products.</p>\r\n<h6>Key criteria for fibre production:</h6>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Organic certification of fibres on basis of recognised international or national standards (IFOAM family of standards, EEC 834/2007, USDA NOP)</li>\r\n<li>Certification of fibres from conversion period is possible if the applicable farming standard permits such certification</li>\r\n<li>A textile product carrying the GOTS label grade ‘organic’ must contain a minimum of 95% certified organic fibres whereas a product with the label grade ‘made with organic’ must contain a minimum of 70% certified organic fibres</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<h6>Key criteria for processing and manufacturing:</h6>\r\n<p><strong>Environmental Criteria</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>At all stages through the processing organic fibre products must be separated from conventional fibre products and must to be clearly identified</li>\r\n<li>All chemical inputs (e.g. dyes, auxiliaries and process chemicals) must be evaluated and meeting basic requirements on toxicity and biodegradability/eliminability</li>\r\n<li>Prohibition of critical inputs such as toxic heavy metals, formaldehyde, aromatic solvents, functional nano particles, genetically modified organisms (GMO) and their enzymes</li>\r\n<li>The use of synthetic sizing agents is restricted; knitting and weaving oils must not contain heavy metals</li>\r\n<li>Bleaches must be based on oxygen (no chlorine bleaching)</li>\r\n<li>Azo dyes that release carcinogenic amine compounds are prohibited</li>\r\n<li>Discharge printing methods using aromatic solvents and plastisol printing methods using phthalates and PVC are prohibited</li>\r\n<li>Restrictions for accessories (e.g. no PVC, nickel or chrome permitted)</li>\r\n<li>All operators must have an environmental policy including target goals and procedures to minimise waste and discharges</li>\r\n<li>Wet processing units must keep full records of the use of chemicals, energy, water consumption and waste water treatment, including the disposal of sludge. The waste water from all wet processing units must be treated in a functional waste water treatment plant.</li>\r\n<li>Packaging material must not contain PVC. Paper or cardboard used in packaging material, hang tags, swing tags etc. must be recycled or certified according to FSC or PEFC</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>Technical Quality and Human Toxicity Criteria</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Technical quality parameters must be met (s.a. rubbing, perspiration, light and washing fastness and shrinkage values)</li>\r\n<li>Raw materials, intermediates, final textile products as well as accessories must meet stringent limits regarding unwanted residues</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>Social Criteria</strong></p>\r\n<p>Social criteria based on the key norms of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) must be met by all processors and manufacturers. They must have a social compliance management with defined elements in place to ensure that the social criteria can be met. For adequate implementation and assessment of the following social criteria topics the listed apparel <a href=\"http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12030:0::NO:::\" target=\"_blank\">key conventions of the International Labour Organization (ILO)</a> have to be taken as the relevant basis for interpretation.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Employment is freely chosen<br>C29 - Forced Labour Convention<br>C105 - Abolition of Forced Labour Convention</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining are respected<br>C87 - Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention<br>C98 - Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention<br>C135 - Workers' Representatives Convention<br>C154 - Collective Bargaining Convention</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Working conditions are safe and hygienic<br>C155 - Occupational Safety and Health Convention</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Child labour must not be used<br>C138 - Minimum Age Convention<br>C182 - Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Living wages<br>C95 - Protection of Wages Convention<br>C131 - Minimum Wage Fixing Convention</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Working hours are not excessive<br>C1 - Hours of Work (Industry) Convention<br>C14 - Weekly Rest (Industry) Convention<br>C30 - Hours of Work (Commerce and Offices) Convention<br>C106 - Weekly Rest (Commerce and Offices) Convention</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>No discrimination is practised<br>C100 - Equal Remuneration Convention<br>C111 - Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Regular employment is provided<br>C158: Termination of Employment Convention<br>C175: Part-time Work Convention<br>C177: Homework Convention<br>C181 Private Employment Agencies Convention</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Harsh or inhumane treatment is prohibited<br>C29 - Forced Labour Convention<br>C105 - Abolition of Forced Labour Convention</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Source: [[https://www.global-standard.org/the-standard/general-description.html|GOTS General Description of the Standard]]</p>\r\n<p>More details on the criteria can be found here, pages 7-32: [[https://www.global-standard.org/images/GOTS_Documents/GOTS_Standard_5.0_EN.pdf|GOTS Standard 5.0]] </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Accessories",
        "Babywear",
        "Children's wear",
        "Fabrics",
        "Garments",
        "Home textiles",
        "Hygiene products",
        "Ladieswear",
        "Leasure wear",
        "Men's wear",
        "Non-wovens",
        "Raw fibres",
        "Socks",
        "Sportswear",
        "Technical textiles",
        "Toys",
        "Underwear",
        "Yarn",
        "Other"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Organic_Textile_Standard+GOTS_Certification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5661916,
      "name": "Open Supply Hub+OS Hub Contributor",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Supply_Hub+OS_Hub_Contributor.json",
      "designer": "Open Supply Hub",
      "title": "OS Hub Contributor",
      "question": "Is this company a contributor to the Open Supply Hub?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The [[https://opensupplyhub.org/|Open Supply Hub]] is an open source map and database of global supply chain facilities, their affiliations and unique OS Hub IDs assigned to each facility.</p>\r\n<p>The OS Hub can be freely used to:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Update and standardize facility names and addresses against the database</li>\r\n<li>Understand affiliations of current and prospect facilities to identify opportunities for collaboration</li>\r\n<li>Find potential new suppliers, listed with their credentials and affiliations</li>\r\n<li>Leverage the OS Hub ID as a unique and shared ID across software systems and databases</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go directly to the <span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">[[https://opensupplyhub.org/|Open Supply Hub]] </span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">to find the organization you are researching. Click the \"search\" tab to search contributors. If you do not find the organization you are looking for, the answer is \"No\". </span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Yes, year not cited",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 474,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 358,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Supply_Hub+OS_Hub_Contributor+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5662009,
      "name": "Project JUST Research Group+Overstock policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Overstock_policy.json",
      "designer": "Project JUST Research Group",
      "title": "Overstock policy",
      "question": "Does the organization have a system in place to manage its overstock?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Project JUST was created to transform the fashion industry into a transparent, accountable and sustainable system that celebrates the stories, the people and the resources behind the clothing.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To do so, they developed a robust methodology for researching brands and their sustainability practices for their searchable brand directory. The directory provides comparable research on brands to empower shoppers to make more informed and ethical purchasing decisions and to put pressure on brands to improve their practices.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While Project JUST dissolved in 2018, the research methodology can be continued through data contributions on Wikirate. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric falls within the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Environment</span> section of questions,</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> which covers key measurable aspects of environmental sustainability for a fashion retail brand, from material impact to energy and waste conservation.</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Use publicly available reports from the brand OR third-party reported information for the</span> Project JUST category: <a href=\"/PJ_Categories\" target=\"_blank\">Environment</a> to answer this question. <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">We suggest familiarizing yourself with the brand’s reporting by visiting the brand’s website, or Annual, Integrated or CR Reports.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Managing overstock is important, as it showcases which brands are <strong>keeping added waste out of landfills by choosing not to destroy any overstock garments</strong>.</span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong>For example</strong>, Lululemon specifically has a section on its website titled “We Made Too Much” where they report how that they sell overstock merchandise at a discounted price and at final sale. Many companies incinerate overstock. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> and search terms: Overstock, Burn, Incinerate, Unsold</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Once found, select one of the below answer options for the correct year you are researching, and submit.</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Yes, and brand provides evidence or detail of the process/procedure</li>\r\n<li>Yes, but no evidence or detail provided</li>\r\n<li>No</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>\"No\" should be selected if you are unable to find a policy mentioned in public documents.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes, and brand provides evidence or detail of the process/procedure",
        "Yes, but no evidence or detail provided",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 333,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 16,
      "companies": 133,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Wollongong_Research_Group_2020+Wollongong_2020_Climate_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Damage_Protection_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Project_JUST_Research_Group+Overstock_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5662479,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Seawater withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Seawater_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Seawater withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a",
      "question": "How much seawater did the company withdraw (in cubic metres)? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000089850\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 303</a> addresses the topic of water and effluents. Access to fresh water is essential for human life and wellbeing, and is recognized by the United Nations (UN) as a human right. The Sustainable Development Goals, adopted by the UN as part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, include key targets related to sustainable water management under Goal 6: ‘Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all’. These targets aim, for example, to achieve universal access to safe and affordable drinking water, improve water quality, and address water scarcity.</p>\r\n<p>The amount of water withdrawn and consumed by an organization and the quality of its discharges, can impact the functioning of the ecosystem in numerous ways. Direct impacts on a catchment can have wider impacts on the quality of life in an area, including social and economic consequences for local communities and indigenous peoples. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Seawater</strong> - water in a sea or in an ocean</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify the seawater water withdrawn by an organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords and search terms for this metric</strong></p>\r\n<p>- Water</p>\r\n<p>- Seawater</p>\r\n<p>- Withdrawal</p>\r\n<p>- 303-3</p>\r\n<p>- GRI</p>\r\n<p>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong></p>\r\n<p>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Units</strong></p>\r\n<p>Companies may report water withdrawals in hundreds, thousands or millions of litres, gallons or cubic feet. <strong>The answer for this metric must be entered into Wikirate in cubic metres (M3)</strong>. Make sure you check the unit of measurement and do any conversions necessary. Enter the full number into the answer field.</p>\r\n<p>E.g. If the company reports its seawater withdrawals as '5 million gallons' the answer should be converted to cubic feet (M3) and entered on Wikirate as '22730.45 M3'</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "M3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 73,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Seawater_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5662650,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Fines for socioeconomic non-compliance, GRI 419-1",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Fines_for_socioeconomic_non_compliance_GRI_419_1.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Fines for socioeconomic non-compliance, GRI 419-1",
      "question": "How much was the company fined (in US dollars) for non-compliance with laws and regulations in the social and economic area?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   \r\n  \r\n <![endif]--> <!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   Normal \r\n   0 \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   false \r\n   false \r\n   false \r\n   \r\n   EN-GB \r\n   X-NONE \r\n   X-NONE \r\n   \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n   \r\n   \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n    \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]> \r\n  \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n   \r\n  \r\n <![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 10]>\r\n \r\n /* Style Definitions */\r\n table.MsoNormalTable\r\n\t{mso-style-name:\"Table Normal\";\r\n\tmso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-tstyle-colband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-style-noshow:yes;\r\n\tmso-style-priority:99;\r\n\tmso-style-parent:\"\";\r\n\tmso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;\r\n\tmso-para-margin:0cm;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;\r\n\tmso-pagination:widow-orphan;\r\n\tfont-size:12.0pt;\r\n\tfont-family:\"Calibri\",sans-serif;\r\n\tmso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;\r\n\tmso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;\r\n\tmso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;\r\n\tmso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;\r\n\tmso-bidi-font-family:\"Times New Roman\";\r\n\tmso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;\r\n\tmso-fareast-language:EN-US;}\r\n \r\n<![endif]--> </p>\r\n<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines.</p>\r\n<p>In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates.</p>\r\n<p><a href=\"/Source_000090327\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 419</a> addresses the topic of socioeconomic compliance. This includes an organization’s overall compliance record, as well as compliance with specific laws or regulations in the social and economic area. Compliance can relate to accounting and tax fraud, corruption, bribery, competition, the provision of products and services, or labor issues, such as workplace discrimination, among others. This includes compliance with international declarations, conventions, and treaties, as well as national, sub-national, regional, and local regulations.</p>\r\n<p>These concepts are covered in key instruments of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The disclosures in this Standard can provide information on an organization’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and with other instruments.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify amount of fines (in USD) the organization has received for non-compliance with social and economic laws and regulations for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords and search terms for this metric</strong></p>\r\n<p>- Fine</p>\r\n<p>- Non-compliance</p>\r\n<p>- 419-1</p>\r\n<p>- GRI</p>\r\n<p>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong></p>\r\n<p>If the company reports that there have been no socioeconomic fines for non-compliance enter the answer as '0'. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Units</strong></p>\r\n<p><strong>The answer for this metric must be in US dollars.</strong> If the fines reported by the organization are not in US dollars convert them to US dollars using <a href=\"https://www.ofx.com/en-gb/forex-news/historical-exchange-rates/yearly-average-rates/\" target=\"_blank\">this currency converter</a>. Make sure you select the year in which report was published as the year for the currency conversion. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 2 - General Disclosures",
        "GRI Standards+2-27 Compliance with laws and regulations",
        "GRI Standards+2-27-a-i Cases with fines",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+G1 - Business Conduct",
        "ESRS Standards+G1.4 - Metrics related to Incidents of corruption or bribery"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Fines_for_socioeconomic_non_compliance_GRI_419_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5662666,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Non-monetary sanctions for socioeconomic non-compliance, GRI 419-1",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Non_monetary_sanctions_for_socioeconomic_non_compliance_GRI_419_1.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Non-monetary sanctions for socioeconomic non-compliance, GRI 419-1",
      "question": "How many non-monetary sanctions for socioeconomic non-compliance did the organization incur?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090327\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 419</a> addresses the topic of socioeconomic compliance. This includes an organization’s overall compliance record, as well as compliance with specific laws or regulations in the social and economic area. Compliance can relate to accounting and tax fraud, corruption, bribery, competition, the provision of products and services, or labor issues, such as workplace discrimination, among others. This includes compliance with international declarations, conventions, and treaties, as well as national, sub-national, regional, and local regulations.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">These concepts are covered in key instruments of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The disclosures in this Standard can provide information on an organization’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and with other instruments.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify the number of non-monetary sanctions the organization has received for non-compliance with social and economic laws and regulations for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords and search terms for this metric</strong></p>\r\n<p>- Sanction</p>\r\n<p>- Non-compliance</p>\r\n<p>- 419-1</p>\r\n<p>- GRI</p>\r\n<p>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong></p>\r\n<p>If the company reports that there have been no socioeconomic non-monetary sanctions for non-compliance enter the answer as '0'. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 2 - General Disclosures",
        "GRI Standards+2-27 Compliance with laws and regulations",
        "GRI Standards+2-27-a Significant non-compliance cases",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+G1 - Business Conduct",
        "ESRS Standards+G1.4 - Metrics related to Incidents of corruption or bribery"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 23,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Non_monetary_sanctions_for_socioeconomic_non_compliance_GRI_419_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5662676,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Cases brought through dispute mechanisms for socioeconomic non-compliance, GRI 419-1",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Cases_brought_through_dispute_mechanisms_for_socioeconomic_non_compliance_GRI_419_1.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Cases brought through dispute mechanisms for socioeconomic non-compliance, GRI 419-1",
      "question": "How many cases for socioeconomic non-compliance were brought through dispute mechanisms against the organization? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090327\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 419</a> addresses the topic of socioeconomic compliance. This includes an organization’s overall compliance record, as well as compliance with specific laws or regulations in the social and economic area. Compliance can relate to accounting and tax fraud, corruption, bribery, competition, the provision of products and services, or labor issues, such as workplace discrimination, among others. This includes compliance with international declarations, conventions, and treaties, as well as national, sub-national, regional, and local regulations.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">These concepts are covered in key instruments of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The disclosures in this Standard can provide information on an organization’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and with other instruments.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify the number of cases brought through dispute resolution mechanisms the organization has received for non-compliance with social and economic laws and regulations for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords and search terms for this metric</strong></p>\r\n<p>- Dispute resolution</p>\r\n<p>- Non-compliance</p>\r\n<p>- 419-1</p>\r\n<p>- GRI</p>\r\n<p>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong></p>\r\n<p>If the company reports that there have been no cases brought through dispute resolution mechanisms for non-compliance enter the answer as '0'. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 2 - General Disclosures",
        "GRI Standards+2-27 Compliance with laws and regulations",
        "GRI Standards+2-27-a Significant non-compliance cases",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+G1 - Business Conduct",
        "ESRS Standards+G1.4 - Metrics related to Incidents of corruption or bribery"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Cases_brought_through_dispute_mechanisms_for_socioeconomic_non_compliance_GRI_419_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5663035,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Produced water withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Produced_water_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Produced water withdrawals, GRI 303-3-a",
      "question": "How much produced water did the company withdraw (in cubic metres)? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000089850\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 303</a> addresses the topic of water and effluents. Access to fresh water is essential for human life and wellbeing, and is recognized by the United Nations (UN) as a human right. The Sustainable Development Goals, adopted by the UN as part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, include key targets related to sustainable water management under Goal 6: ‘Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all’. These targets aim, for example, to achieve universal access to safe and affordable drinking water, improve water quality, and address water scarcity.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The amount of water withdrawn and consumed by an organization and the quality of its discharges, can impact the functioning of the ecosystem in numerous ways. Direct impacts on a catchment can have wider impacts on the quality of life in an area, including social and economic consequences for local communities and indigenous peoples. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Produced water </strong>- water that enters an organization’s boundary as a result of extraction (e.g., crude oil), processing (e.g., sugar cane crushing), or use of any raw material, and has to consequently be managed by the organization</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify the produced water withdrawn by an organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 1rem;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p>- Water</p>\r\n<p>- Produced water</p>\r\n<p>- Withdrawal</p>\r\n<p>- 303-3</p>\r\n<p>- GRI</p>\r\n<p>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units</span></p>\r\n<p>Companies may report water withdrawals in hundreds, thousands or millions of litres, gallons or cubic feet. <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">The answer for this metric must be entered into Wikirate in cubic metres (M3)</span>. Make sure you check the unit of measurement and do any conversions necessary. Enter the full number into the answer field.</p>\r\n<p>E.g. If the company reports its produced water withdrawals as '5 million gallons' the answer should be converted to cubic feet (M3) and entered on Wikirate as '22730.45 M3'</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "M3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 303 - Water and Effluents",
        "GRI Standards+303-3 Water withdrawal",
        "GRI Standards+303-3-a Water withdrawal from all areas, broken down by source",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E3 - Water",
        "ESRS Standards+E3.4 - Water metrics"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 70,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Produced_water_withdrawals_GRI_303_3_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5663400,
      "name": "As You Sow+CEO pay",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+CEO_pay.json",
      "designer": "As You Sow",
      "title": "CEO pay",
      "question": "How much did the company's Chief Executive Officer get paid?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Over 300:1. That’s the ratio of CEO to employee pay in the United States. The U.S. leads the world in excessive executive compensation, to the detriment of shareholders. The current system of executive pay distorts incentives, exacerbates income inequality, and leads consumers and employees to think the game is rigged against them.</p>\r\n<p>As You Sow’s Executive Compensation initiative encourages shareholders to use the power of the proxy to better control and reduce unjustified CEO pay and to create greater equity in compensation across all publicly traded US companies. Our goal is to help shareholders, including mutual funds, pensions, foundation, endowments, and individuals to create proactive change in a broken system. The initiative:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Engages shareholders and helping them hold money managers accountable for their votes;</li>\r\n<li>Pushes companies to develop new social and environmental performance criteria, and working with them to do so;</li>\r\n<li>Identifies the most overpaid executives, the money managers that approved the compensation plans, the consultants that proposed them, and the compensation committee board directors that approved their compensation packages;</li>\r\n<li>Encourages foundations and public funds to adopt stringent voting guidelines to address specific disconnects between pay and performance, as well as the systemic issues that drive the increases, such as peer group selection and inflationary ratcheting up of compensation.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>The median pay for S&amp;P 500 CEOs is now well over  $10 million dollars. The current system of executive pay:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Contributes to the destabilizing effects of income inequality;</li>\r\n<li>Makes investors, consumers and employees wonder if they are playing in a game rigged against them;</li>\r\n<li>Distorts incentives, leading to a short-term focus rather than sustainable growth for companies.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>A r<a href=\"https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/13/executive-pay-poll_n_4780170.html\">ecent poll showed</a> that only 18% of Americans think the pay of top corporate executives is appropriate. Yet for the most part, shareholder advisory votes (which are required under corporate reform) give rubber-stamp approval to astronomical executive compensation packages, with average support of over 90 percent.</p>\r\n<p>Source: [[https://www.asyousow.org/our-work/ceo-pay|As You Sow]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>CEO Pay data included here is either taken from As You Sow's research or gathered through desk research. For researchers, look for this information to be published in a company's annual or sustainability report or [[https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch|SEC Proxy Report (US companies)]] . If the answer is not found, mark \"Unknown\".</p>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div class=\"w-full\">\r\n<p>When dealing with companies that have multiple CEOs, calculate the average pay and provide in the comments all relevant information. This should include specifying the number of CEOs considered, noting that an average was calculated, and indicating the exact page number in the cited report or document where one can locate the answer.</p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 981,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 12,
      "companies": 365,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+CEO_pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5663409,
      "name": "As You Sow+Expected CEO Pay",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Expected_CEO_Pay.json",
      "designer": "As You Sow",
      "title": "Expected CEO Pay",
      "question": "Assuming CEO pay is based on performance and therefore related to total shareholder return (TSR), how much should the company be paying their Chief Executive Officer?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Although we, like many other analysts, find very weak links between pay amounts and company financial performance, the usual justification for high executive pay is that they are connected to enhanced profits and above-average capital appreciation for the shareholders who foot the bill. If we grant the assumption that pay should be determined by performance, and then use a basic statistical technique to map actual performance outcomes to predicted levels of pay relative to those outcomes, we can then see how much the CEO pay package exceeded such a prediction.</p>\r\n<p>Source: [[https://www.asyousow.org/report/the-100-most-overpaid-ceos-2019|As You Sow]]</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Research Document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 595,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 261,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Expected_CEO_Pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5663418,
      "name": "As You Sow+Excess CEO Pay (USD)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Excess_CEO_Pay_USD.json",
      "designer": "As You Sow",
      "title": "Excess CEO Pay (USD)",
      "question": "How much more did the company's CEO get paid, than what would be expected if the pay was determined in relation to the company's total shareholder return (TSR)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Although we, like many other analysts, find very weak links between pay amounts and company financial performance, the usual justification for high executive pay is that they are connected to enhanced profits and above-average capital appreciation for the shareholders who foot the bill. If we grant the assumption that pay should be determined by performance, and then use a basic statistical technique to map actual performance outcomes to predicted levels of pay relative to those outcomes, we can then see how much the CEO pay package exceeded such a prediction.</p>\r\n<p>Source: [[https://www.asyousow.org/report/the-100-most-overpaid-ceos-2019|As You Sow]]</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Research Document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 595,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 261,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Excess_CEO_Pay_USD+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5663427,
      "name": "As You Sow+Excess CEO Pay (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Excess_CEO_Pay.json",
      "designer": "As You Sow",
      "title": "Excess CEO Pay (%)",
      "question": "How much more did the company's CEO get paid, than what would be expected if the pay was determined in relation to the company's total shareholder return (TSR)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Although we, like many other analysts, find very weak links between pay amounts and company financial performance, the usual justification for high executive pay is that they are connected to enhanced profits and above-average capital appreciation for the shareholders who foot the bill. If we grant the assumption that pay should be determined by performance, and then use a basic statistical technique to map actual performance outcomes to predicted levels of pay relative to those outcomes, we can then see how much the CEO pay package exceeded such a prediction.</p>\r\n<p>Source: [[https://www.asyousow.org/report/the-100-most-overpaid-ceos-2019|As You Sow]]</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Research Document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 593,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 260,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Excess_CEO_Pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5663436,
      "name": "As You Sow+Median Employee Pay",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Median_Employee_Pay.json",
      "designer": "As You Sow",
      "title": "Median Employee Pay",
      "question": "What is the company's median employee pay?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Thanks to the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform bill, shareholders gained access to new information in 2018. Companies must now disclose the ratio of pay between the CEO and the company’s median employee, shining a brighter light on how high CEO pay has become. This new information can also be used in other ways, as the city of Portland, Oregon demonstrates, being the first to introduce a corporation tax rate based on this ratio.</p>\r\n<p>The AFL-CIO has been tracking these ratios as they appear in company proxy statements. The average of these CEO pay to median worker pay ratios as of Sep. 5, 2018 was approximately 273:1. This contrasts sharply with around the world as reported in a BBC article. In the United Kingdom — the only other non-U.S. country besides India where CEOs make more than 200 times their employees — the ratio is estimated at 201:1. In the Netherlands the ratio is 171:1; in Switzerland it is 152:1. In Germany, where workers are represented on boards of directors, it is 136:1.</p>\r\n<p>Source: [[https://www.asyousow.org/report/the-100-most-overpaid-ceos-2019|As You Sow]]</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Research Document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 100,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Median_Employee_Pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5663445,
      "name": "As You Sow+CEO to Worker Pay Ratio",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+CEO_to_Worker_Pay_Ratio.json",
      "designer": "As You Sow",
      "title": "CEO to Worker Pay Ratio",
      "question": "What is the company's CEO to median worker pay ratio?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Thanks to the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform bill, shareholders gained access to new information in 2018. Companies must now disclose the ratio of pay between the CEO and the company’s median employee, shining a brighter light on how high CEO pay has become. This new information can also be used in other ways, as the city of Portland, Oregon demonstrates, being the first to introduce a corporation tax rate based on this ratio.</p>\r\n<p>The AFL-CIO has been tracking these ratios as they appear in company proxy statements. The average of these CEO pay to median worker pay ratios as of Sep. 5, 2018 was approximately 273:1. This contrasts sharply with around the world as reported in a BBC article. In the United Kingdom — the only other non-U.S. country besides India where CEOs make more than 200 times their employees — the ratio is estimated at 201:1. In the Netherlands the ratio is 171:1; in Switzerland it is 152:1. In Germany, where workers are represented on boards of directors, it is 136:1.</p>\r\n<p>Source: [[https://www.asyousow.org/report/the-100-most-overpaid-ceos-2019|As You Sow]]</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Research Document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": ":1",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 199,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 149,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+CEO_to_Worker_Pay_Ratio+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5663454,
      "name": "As You Sow+Ranking for Most Overpaid CEOs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Ranking_for_Most_Overpaid_CEOs.json",
      "designer": "As You Sow",
      "title": "Ranking for Most Overpaid CEOs",
      "question": "How high did the company rank in As You Sow's study on The 100 Most Overpaid CEOs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>HIP Investor regression we’ve used every year that computes excess CEO pay assuming such pay is related to total shareholder return (TSR). The second ranking identified the companies where the most shares were voted against the CEO pay package. These two rankings were weighted 2:1, with the regression analysis being the majority. We then excluded those CEOs whose total disclosed compensation (TDC) was in the lowest third of all the S&amp;P 500 CEO pay packages.</p>\r\n<p>Source: [[https://www.asyousow.org/report/the-100-most-overpaid-ceos-2019|As You Sow]]</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Research Document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "1-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 588,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 260,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Ranking_for_Most_Overpaid_CEOs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5663463,
      "name": "As You Sow+Shareholder Votes to Approve CEO Pay",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Shareholder_Votes_to_Approve_CEO_Pay.json",
      "designer": "As You Sow",
      "title": "Shareholder Votes to Approve CEO Pay",
      "question": "What percentage of shareholders voted to approve the company's CEO pay?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>We have analyzed how the largest investors in S&amp;P 500 companies, namely mutual funds, ETFs, and public pension funds, have voted their shares on the issue of CEO pay. This enables us to see which funds are exercising their fiduciary responsibility and which are acquiescing to management in squandering company resources.</p>\r\n<p>Source: [[https://www.asyousow.org/report/the-100-most-overpaid-ceos-2019|As You Sow]]</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Research Document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 195,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 152,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Shareholder_Votes_to_Approve_CEO_Pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5663472,
      "name": "As You Sow+Shareholder Votes Against CEO Pay",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Shareholder_Votes_Against_CEO_Pay.json",
      "designer": "As You Sow",
      "title": "Shareholder Votes Against CEO Pay",
      "question": "What percentage of shareholders voted against the company's CEO pay?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>We have analyzed how the largest investors in S&amp;P 500 companies, namely mutual funds, ETFs, and public pension funds, have voted their shares on the issue of CEO pay. This enables us to see which funds are exercising their fiduciary responsibility and which are acquiescing to management in squandering company resources.</p>\r\n<p>The most common reason cited to vote against pay packages is that they are not strongly connected to performance, but disclosure failures and other issues also factor heavily. Here is some specific language — collected from guidelines or disclosure on particular votes — that illustrates reasons for opposition. All of these are explanations for why a fund may, or may already have, voted against pay packages.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Pay disconnected from performance; excessive potential pay; peer issues. Funds have policies that vote against: </strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>CEO pay plans that have no absolute limit on the amount of some or all of various bonus payments;</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>CEO pay plans that have discretionary payments;</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Some or all of CEO pay awards vest automatically as time passes instead requiring the meeting of some performance requirement at each vesting point;</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Any performance requirement that allows vesting when performance is below the median of peers;</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Any payment in the form of stock options.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>Failure of adequate disclosure: </strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>The short-term incentive program or long-term incentive program thresholds and maximums are not sufficiently disclosed;</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>No identifiable limit for each of the different components within the policy.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>Insufficient long-term emphasis and risk mitigation practices: </strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Long-term incentive plans with performance cycles shorter than 3 years;</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>The absence of clawbacks of variable remuneration;</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Insufficient holding period requirements.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Source: [[https://www.asyousow.org/report/the-100-most-overpaid-ceos-2019|As You Sow]]</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Research Document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 100,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Shareholder_Votes_Against_CEO_Pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5663508,
      "name": "Commons+Renewable Fuel Consumption (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Renewable_Fuel_Consumption.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Renewable Fuel Consumption (%)",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's fuel consumption comes from renewable sources? ",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / (m1 + m2) * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~836964"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~836952"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3521,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 1286,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Renewable_Fuel_Consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5664290,
      "name": "Aileen Rob+RE100 Company",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+RE100_Company.json",
      "designer": "Aileen Rob",
      "title": "RE100 Company",
      "question": "Has the company made a public commitment to 100% renewable power as part of the RE100 initiative? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The RE100 is a collaborative initiative, led by The Climate Group in partnership with CDP, which brings together the world’s most influential businesses committed to 100% renewable power. RE100 members, including Global Fortune 500 companies, operate in a diverse range of sectors.</p>\r\n<p>To join the campaign, companies must meet a number of criteria, including to be willing to make a public commitment to sourcing 100% renewable electricity throughout their entire operations, and <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">have a renewable power strategy that includes credible deadlines for achieving 100% RE</span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">. The minimum requirements are</span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>100% by 2050, with interim steps of at least</li>\r\n<li>60% by 2030</li>\r\n<li>90% by 2040 </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>See full <a href=\"http://media.virbcdn.com/files/83/a63c2f326b040f9f-RE100JoiningCriteria.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">RE100 joining criteria</a>.</p>\r\n<p>See the full list of <a href=\"http://there100.org/companies\" target=\"_blank\">RE100 companies</a> and their commitments.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Information on company membership can be found on the homepage <a href=\"http://there100.org/companies\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">there100.org/companies</a></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1019,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 516,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+RE100_Company+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5664658,
      "name": "theresah+reported renewable breakdown",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/theresah+reported_renewable_breakdown.json",
      "designer": "theresah",
      "title": "reported renewable breakdown",
      "question": "Did the company report a breakdown of renewable energy use alongside total energy use?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This formula uses three metrics to assess whether a company has reported a their total energy use, but not a breakdown of renewable and non-renewable use.</p>\r\n<p>If the company has been researched and has reported the total energy use, but has not reported the non-renewable fuel or the renewable fuel use, it is not possible to assess the company's percentage fo renewable energy use.  </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No, only reports total energy use"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if ((m1 > 0) && (m2 > 0) && (m3 > 0)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No, only reports total energy use\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~846580",
          "unknown": "0"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~836964",
          "unknown": "0"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~836952",
          "unknown": "0"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3139,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1144,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/theresah+reported_renewable_breakdown+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5664680,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Total injuries, GRI 403-9-a",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_injuries_GRI_403_9_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Total injuries, GRI 403-9-a",
      "question": "How many employee work-related injuries were recorded during the reporting year? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090317\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 403</a> addresses the topic of occupational health and safety. Healthy and safe work conditions are recognized as a human right and addressed in authoritative intergovernmental instruments, including those of the International Labour Organization (ILO), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and the World Health Organization (WHO).</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Healthy and safe work conditions involve both prevention of physical and mental harm, and promotion of workers’ health.  </p>\r\n<p>Data on work-related injuries are a measure of the extent of harm suffered by workers; they are not a measure of safety.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Recordable work-related injuries</strong>: work-related injury that results in any of the following: death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness; or significant injury diagnosed by a physician or other licensed healthcare professional, even if it does not result in death, days away from work, restricted work or job transfer, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify total number of recordable injuries in an organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords and search terms for this metric</strong></p>\r\n<p>- Injury / Injuries</p>\r\n<p>- Accident</p>\r\n<p>- 403-9</p>\r\n<p>- GRI</p>\r\n<p>- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations</strong></p>\r\n<p>Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "injuries",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 403 - Occupational Health and Safety",
        "GRI Standards+403-9 Work-related injuries",
        "GRI Standards+403-9-a Worker-relate injuries among employees and workers"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 34,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 11,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Total_injuries_GRI_403_9_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5664692,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Cases of work-related ill health, GRI 403-10-a",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Cases_of_work_related_ill_health_GRI_403_10_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Cases of work-related ill health, GRI 403-10-a",
      "question": "How many cases of work-related ill health were recorded during the reporting year? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090317\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 403</a> addresses the topic of occupational health and safety. Healthy and safe work conditions are recognized as a human right and addressed in authoritative intergovernmental instruments, including those of the International Labour Organization (ILO), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and the World Health Organization (WHO).</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Healthy and safe work conditions involve both prevention of physical and mental harm, and promotion of workers’ health. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Work-related ill health </strong>can include acute, recurring, and chronic health problems caused or aggravated by work conditions or practices. They include musculoskeletal disorders, skin and respiratory diseases, malignant cancers, diseases caused by physical agents (e.g., noise-induced hearing loss, vibration-caused diseases), and mental illnesses (e.g., anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder).</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify total number of cases of work-related ill health in an organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Illness</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Health</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- 403-10</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "cases of work-related ill health",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 403 - Occupational Health and Safety",
        "GRI Standards+403-10 Work-related ill health",
        "GRI Standards+403-10-a-ii Number of cases of recordable work-related ill health",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+S1 - Own Workforce",
        "ESRS Standards+S1.13 - Health and Safety metrics"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 34,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 13,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Cases_of_work_related_ill_health_GRI_403_10_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5664718,
      "name": "Climate Action Research+Renewable Energy Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Climate_Action_Research+Renewable_Energy_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "Climate Action Research",
      "title": "Renewable Energy Commitment",
      "question": "What commitment has the organization made towards use of renewable energy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The role of renewable energy solutions in mitigating climate change is proven. The heavy reliance on fossil fuels and inefficient and outdated coal-fired power plants is one of the main reasons for the energy sector’s high contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions. This not only elevates global temperatures but seriously impacts on air quality and human health. Transitioning to renewable energies therefore supports significant progress on the Paris Agreement on climate change, as well as on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: </span><a href=\"https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/2030-agenda-for-sustainable-development/planet/sustainable-energy/renewable-energy.html\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">UNDP</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The answer should fill in the blank in the sentence below:</p>\r\n<p>\"The company has committed to _______\" <br><br>E.g. If the company has committed to 100% renewable energy by 2050, you should enter '100% renewable energy by 2050' in the answer box. </p>\r\n<p>Include short statements from the company's sustainability or annual reports, or, <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">if the company is a member,</span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> from the <a href=\"http://there100.org/companies\" target=\"_blank\">RE100</a>. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">If a reference to a renewable energy committment cannot be found in the appropriate sources, the answer should be <strong><em>Unknown</em></strong>. </span></p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Climate_Action_Research+Renewable_Energy_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5666127,
      "name": "theresah+Total Renewable Energy Use",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/theresah+Total_Renewable_Energy_Use.json",
      "designer": "theresah",
      "title": "Total Renewable Energy Use",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  (m1 - m2) / m1 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~846580"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~836952"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3239,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1165,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/theresah+Total_Renewable_Energy_Use+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5672934,
      "name": "Core+Reporting Format",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Reporting_Format.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Reporting Format",
      "question": "In what format(s) did the company publish its ESG data?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Corporate transparency is not only about <strong><em>what</em></strong> information is disclosed, but also about <em><strong>how</strong> </em>this information is disclosed. Tucking information away in text heavy documents with hundreds of pages and in a format that is not 'machine-readable' is simply not transparent. It requires individuals to digg through these reports, which is time and resource intense, and is not a realistic expectation when you want society to be able to use the information published.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric asks in what format(s) companies provide information around their environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. The focus of this question is on <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">the file type and if it is text or in table format.</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p>Multiple answer options may apply.</p>\r\n<p>Please cite all appropriate reports and files as a source. When you file the source, please make sure to tag the source with the content type (see the drop down menu in the field \"Report Type\" when creating a new source).  </p>\r\n<p>If the file format that you have found is not listed among the answer options, please select \"Other\" and explain in the comments what file type it is.</p>\r\n<p>If you find no applicable report, answer “No” and cite the company’s website or other relevant page.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "PDF (text)",
        "PDF (table)",
        "Excel (xlsx)",
        "CSV",
        "HTML (text)",
        "HTML (table)",
        "Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Reporting_Format+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5672942,
      "name": "Core+ESG Report Audited",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+ESG_Report_Audited.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "ESG Report Audited",
      "question": "Has the company’s ESG report been audited, and if so by whom?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Annual and sustainability reports are provided by many large and multinational enterprises, but even within these, corporate reporting varies. This metric asks whether the <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">environmental, social and governance (ESG) </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">reports and disclosures that companies provide have been verified through a third party audit.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric asks whether the company's report containing information about its environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance, has been audited by a third party. </p>\r\n<p>Such information is likely to be located at the start or end of the document, possibly in a footnote or clause on the inside of the title page.</p>\r\n<p>Helpful keywords to search for may include:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>audit</li>\r\n<li>verified</li>\r\n<li>verification</li>\r\n<li>the names of the individual consulting firms listed as the answer options</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>If the ESG report has been audited by a third party not listed among the answer options, please select \"Other\" and explain in the comments which third party conducted the audit.</p>\r\n<p>If you can find no information about such an audit being done, answer “No” and cite the sources in which you looked for the information.</p>\r\n<p><em><strong>Please note</strong> that an ESG report audit is different from audits that might be done at factories in a company's supply chain. This particular metric question is looking for evidence of an audit being done on the report more generally.</em></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "KPMG",
        "Deloitte",
        "Ernst & Young",
        "Accenture",
        "PWC",
        "McKinsey",
        "Bain & Company Inc",
        "BCG",
        "Mercer",
        "Booz Allen Hamilton",
        "Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+ESG_Report_Audited+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5677877,
      "name": "Global Organic Textile Standard+GOTS Certifier",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Organic_Textile_Standard+GOTS_Certifier.json",
      "designer": "Global Organic Textile Standard",
      "title": "GOTS Certifier",
      "question": "Which companies are certified by this company?",
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Organic_Textile_Standard+GOTS_Certifier+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5677885,
      "name": "Global Organic Textile Standard+GOTS Certified",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Organic_Textile_Standard+GOTS_Certified.json",
      "designer": "Global Organic Textile Standard",
      "title": "GOTS Certified",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Organic_Textile_Standard+GOTS_Certified+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5711168,
      "name": "Aileen Rob+Top 100 Shareholders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+Top_100_Shareholders.json",
      "designer": "Aileen Rob",
      "title": "Top 100 Shareholders",
      "question": "Is the company a shareholder of a FashionUnited Top 100 Index company? ",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (numKnown([fashion].flat()) > 0) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "company": "Commons+Shareholder Of",
          "metric": "~5711237",
          "name": "fashion"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 486,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 486,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+Top_100_Shareholders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5711237,
      "name": "Top 100 Fashion Project Research Group+FashionUnited Top 100 Index",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Top_100_Fashion_Project_Research_Group+FashionUnited_Top_100_Index.json",
      "designer": "Top 100 Fashion Project Research Group",
      "title": "FashionUnited Top 100 Index",
      "question": "Is the company part of the FashionUnited Top 100 Index?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Standard",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Top 100 Fashion Project Research Group+FashionUnited Top 100 Index+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 96,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 96,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Top_100_Fashion_Project_Research_Group+FashionUnited_Top_100_Index+Aileen_Rob.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+Top_100_Shareholders.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Top_100_Fashion_Project_Research_Group+FashionUnited_Top_100_Index+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5712020,
      "name": "Top 100 Fashion Project Research Group+FashionUnited Top 100 Index+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Top_100_Fashion_Project_Research_Group+FashionUnited_Top_100_Index+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "Top 100 Fashion Project Research Group",
      "title": "FashionUnited Top 100 Index",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 96,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 96,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Top_100_Fashion_Project_Research_Group+FashionUnited_Top_100_Index+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5746387,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Product Types Produced",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Product_Types_Produced.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Product Types Produced",
      "question": "What product types does the company produce/manufacture?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Product_Types_Produced+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5749381,
      "name": "Climate Action Research+Total renewable energy consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Climate_Action_Research+Total_renewable_energy_consumption.json",
      "designer": "Climate Action Research",
      "title": "Total renewable energy consumption",
      "question": "What is the company's total renewable energy consumption (in gigajoules)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>An organization can consume energy in various forms, such as fuel, electricity, heating, cooling or steam. Energy can be self-generated or purchased from external sources and it can come from renewable sources (such as wind, hydro or solar) or from non-renewable sources (such as coal, petroleum or natural gas).</p>\r\n<p>Using energy more efficiently and opting for renewable energy sources is essential for combating climate change and for lowering an organization’s overall environmental footprint. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the total renewable energy consumption of the organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Energy</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Renewable</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Solar</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Wind</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Hydro</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Companies may report energy consumption in hundreds, thousands or millions of gigajoules, joules, MWh or GWh. <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">The answer for this metric must be entered into Wikirate in gigajoules (GJ)</span>. Make sure you check the unit of measurement and do any conversions necessary. Enter the full number into the answer field.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">E.g. If the company reports its energy consumption as '500,000 MWh' the answer should be converted to GJ and entered on Wikirate as '1800000 gigajoules'</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Gigajoules",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 61,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Total_Renewable_Energy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Climate_Action_Research+Total_renewable_energy_consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5749396,
      "name": "Climate Action Research+100% Renewable Electricity Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Climate_Action_Research+100_Renewable_Electricity_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "Climate Action Research",
      "title": "100% Renewable Electricity Commitment",
      "question": "Has the organization made a commitment to use 100% renewable electricity and, if yes, by what year have they committed to achieve this? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The role of renewable energy solutions in mitigating climate change is proven. The heavy reliance on fossil fuels and inefficient and outdated coal-fired power plants is one of the main reasons for the energy sector’s high contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions. This not only elevates global temperatures but seriously impacts on air quality and human health. Transitioning to renewable energies therefore supports significant progress on the Paris Agreement on climate change, as well as on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).</p>\r\n<p>The RE100 initiative was launched in 2014 to bring together influential businesses to commit to 100% renewable electricity by 2050. You can find out which companies have signed up, and more about their commitments in the <a href=\"http://there100.org/companies\">RE100 company list</a>.</p>\r\n<p>Sources: <a href=\"https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/2030-agenda-for-sustainable-development/planet/sustainable-energy/renewable-energy.html\">UNDP</a>, <a href=\"http://there100.org/\">RE100</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify whether the company has made a commitment to use 100% renewable electricity by a specified future year.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company is a RE100 member, you can find further details about their commitment on the <a href=\"http://there100.org/companies\">RE100 company list</a>. If the company is not a member, they may have made the commitment on their website, in a policy document or in a sustainability report. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The following categorical answer options are designed to cover all possible answers to this question (i.e. <em>Unknown</em> is never a correct answer)</span>: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong>Already Achieved: </strong>The company has already achieved 100% renewable electricity in its operations. Add in the comments by what year they have achieved this if the information is available</li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">By 2020</strong><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">: The company has committed to 100% renewable electricity by 2020</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">By 2030</strong><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">: </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The company has committed to achieving 100% renewable electricity by 2021 up to 2030</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">By 2040</strong><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">: </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The company has committed to </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">achieving </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">100% renewable electricity by 2031 up to 2040</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">By 2050</strong><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">: </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The company has committed to </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">achieving </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">100% renewable electricity by 2041 up to 2050</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">After 2050</strong><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">: </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The company has committed to </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">achieving </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">100% renewable electricity by 2051 or later</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">No</strong><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">: Select this option if </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">you cannot find a reference to a renewable energy committment in the appropriate sources</span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Already Achieved",
        "By 2020",
        "By 2023",
        "By 2025",
        "By 2030",
        "By 2040",
        "By 2050",
        "After 2050",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 552,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 31,
      "companies": 266,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Wollongong_Research_Group_2020+Wollongong_2020_Climate_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Climate_Action_Research+100_Renewable_Electricity_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5755995,
      "name": "Commons+Total Renewable Energy %",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Total_Renewable_Energy.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Total Renewable Energy %",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's total energy consumption comes from renewable sources? ",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5749381"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~846580"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 60,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Climate_Action_Research+Renewables_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Total_Renewable_Energy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5757610,
      "name": "Climate Action Research+Renewables Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Climate_Action_Research+Renewables_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Climate Action Research",
      "title": "Renewables Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What is the company's disclosure rate out of the 4 indicators?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric calculates the disclosure rate of the four energy use metrics above to showcase how companies are reporting.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([m1, m2, m3, m4]) * 25;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~846580",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~836952",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~836964",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~5755995",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 4504,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1489,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Climate_Action_Research+Renewables_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5760163,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Company Type",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Company_Type.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Company Type",
      "question": "What type of company is the organization considered as part of the minerals sourcing research project?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Downstream",
        "Midstream",
        "SoR (non-3TG)",
        "SoR (3TG+C)",
        "Midstream - International trader",
        "Midstream - Local Mineral Exporter",
        "Upstream Industrial",
        "Upstream Junior",
        "Upstream ASM"
      ],
      "report_type": "Research Document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 505,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 504,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Company_Type+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5763695,
      "name": "Ewha Womans University Research Group+Ewha 2020 - SDG12 Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Ewha Womans University Research Group",
      "title": "Ewha 2020 - SDG12 Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following nineteen SDG12 indicators are disclosed?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric looks at company disclosure rates based on nineteen metrics researched by the Ewha Womans University on metrics relevant to SDG12. </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reputational Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var ms;\n\n  ms = [m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, m8, m9, m10, m11, m12, m13, m14, m15, m16, m17, m18, m19];\n\n  numKnown(ms) / ms.length * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~826615",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~826629",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~849642",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~801164",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~801561",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~801183",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~2313632",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m8",
          "metric": "~5663035",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m9",
          "metric": "~5662479",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m10",
          "metric": "~836051",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m11",
          "metric": "~848767",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m12",
          "metric": "~836246",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m13",
          "metric": "~836262",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m14",
          "metric": "~885125",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m15",
          "metric": "~849130",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m16",
          "metric": "~801383",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m17",
          "metric": "~836097",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m18",
          "metric": "~3341320",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m19",
          "metric": "~3341261",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 8077,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2429,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG12_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5763712,
      "name": "Ewha Womans University Research Group+Ewha 2020 - SDG5 Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Ewha Womans University Research Group",
      "title": "Ewha 2020 - SDG5 Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following eighteen SDG5 indicators are disclosed?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric looks at company disclosure rates based on nineteen metrics researched by the Ewha Womans University on metrics relevant to SDG5. </span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Parental Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, m8, m9, m10, m11, m12, m13, m14, m15, m16, m17, m18]) / 18.0 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~836097",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~837254",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~837241",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~1830298",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~5358814",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~3447767",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~2311262",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m8",
          "metric": "~2311347",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m9",
          "metric": "~2311388",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m10",
          "metric": "~2311271",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m11",
          "metric": "~2311365",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m12",
          "metric": "~2311401",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m13",
          "metric": "~836314",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m14",
          "metric": "~837320",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m15",
          "metric": "~837376",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m16",
          "metric": "~837335",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m17",
          "metric": "~3341320",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m18",
          "metric": "~3341261",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 7174,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2377,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Ewha_Womans_University_Research_Group+Ewha_2020_SDG5_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5768792,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Responsive to Wage Transparency Survey",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Responsive_to_Wage_Transparency_Survey.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Responsive to Wage Transparency Survey",
      "question": "Did the company respond to Clean Clothes Campaign's brand survey on Wage Transparency?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric, the answer 'Yes' is selected if the company responded to the Clean Clothes Campaign brand survey on Wage Transparency. If the company did not respond, the answer 'No' is given and the reason included in the comments. <br><br><em>Please note that this metric can only be researched by the organizations conducting the survey and cannot be included in desk research projects.</em></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Research Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 243,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 126,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Responsive_to_Wage_Transparency_Survey+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5768810,
      "name": "Commons+Has Brands",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Has_Brands.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Has Brands",
      "question": "What brands does this company own, and in which sector(s) does the brand operate?",
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": "<p>Brands are the customer facing version of companies. Sometimes a company will have several brands and might implement different principles and values that guide their operational decisions for each brand. As such it is helpful to understand how a company may operate differently depending on which customer group they are trying to serve.</p>\r\n<p>The sector list in this metric mirrors that of the International Labour Organisation. For more information see: <a href=\"https://www.ilo.org/global/industries-and-sectors/lang--en/index.htm\">ILO Industries and Sectors</a>. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking you to find the brands which the company you are researching owns. Start by looking on the company's website for a list of brands, this information may also be found in the company's annual or integrated reports. </p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commerce",
        "Education",
        "Financial Services and Professional Services",
        "Food/ Drink and Tobacco",
        "Forestry/ Wood and/ Pulp and Paper",
        "Health Services",
        "Hotels/ Tourism and Catering",
        "Mining",
        "Mechanical and Electrical Engineering",
        "Media/ Culture and Graphics",
        "Oil and Gas Production/ and Oil Refining",
        "Postal and Telecommunications Services",
        "Public Service",
        "Shipping/ Ports/ Fisheries and Inland Waterways",
        "Textiles/ Clothing/ Leather and Footwear",
        "Transport",
        "Transport Equipment Manufacturing",
        "Utilities"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 268,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 9,
      "companies": 214,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Industry.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Business_Model_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Has_Brands+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5768831,
      "name": "Commons+Is Brand Of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Is_Brand_Of.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Is Brand Of",
      "question": "Which company is the brand owned by, and in which sector(s) do they operate?",
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [
        "Commerce",
        "Education",
        "Financial Services and Professional Services",
        "Food/ Drink and Tobacco",
        "Forestry/ Wood and/ Pulp and Paper",
        "Health Services",
        "Hotels/ Tourism and Catering",
        "Mining",
        "Mechanical and Electrical Engineering",
        "Media/ Culture and Graphics",
        "Oil and Gas Production/ and Oil Refining",
        "Postal and Telecommunications Services",
        "Public Service",
        "Shipping/ Ports/ Fisheries and Inland Waterways",
        "Textiles/ Clothing/ Leather and Footwear",
        "Transport",
        "Transport Equipment Manufacturing",
        "Utilities"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1109,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 933,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Is_Brand_Of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5768836,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Generic CSR Department Email",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Generic_CSR_Department_Email.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Generic CSR Department Email",
      "question": "What is the company's CSR department email address?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking for the email address of the company's CSR department. Start by searching on the company’s website for a dedicated CSR or sustainability webpage for the department's contact details. This information may also be found in published documents such as CSR policies and sustainability reports.<br><br><strong>Keywords and Search Terms</strong><br><br>- Contact<br>- Sustainability department<br>- CSR department<br><br><strong>Answer Input</strong><br><br>Always cite the source where you found the answer and include any excerpts from the source you find relevant in the Comments field.<br><br>The answer to the metric can be entered as free text but must be in the form of an email address. If you have looked for the information and have not been able to find it, enter the answer as ‘Unknown’.<br><br><em>Note: The email address should be that of a generalized CSR or sustainability department. <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">DO NOT enter the email address of an individual</span> as this could constitute a breach of their privacy.</em></p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 126,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 109,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Generic_CSR_Department_Email+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5768845,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Public Commitment on Living Wage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Public_Commitment_on_Living_Wage.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Public Commitment on Living Wage",
      "question": "Has the company made a public commitment to pay living wages across its supply network?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, Fashion Checker, is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative transparency tool.<br><br><a href=\"https://fashionchecker.org/\">Fashion Checker</a> enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>Clean Clothes Campaign defines a living wage as wage that is <em>earned in a standard working week of no more than 48 hours and allows the garment worker to be able to buy food for herself and her family, pay the rent, pay for healthcare, clothing, transportation and education and have a small amount of savings for when something unexpected happens.</em></p>\r\n<p>(Source: <a href=\"https://cleanclothes.org/faq/pay-living-wages\">CCC</a>)</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company has made a public commitment to achieve payment of living wages across its supply network.</p>\r\n<p>The public commitment<strong> must mention</strong> that a living wage is (1) enough to cover workers’ basic needs, (2) is a family wage and (3) is paid for a regular working week of maximum 48 hours (excluding overtime).</p>\r\n<p>Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents, annual reports and sustainability reports.<br><br><strong>Keywords and Search Terms</strong><br><br>- Living wage<br>- Wages<br>- Supply chain<br><br><strong>Answer Input</strong><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information. <br><br>If the company has made a commitment to pay their workers a living wage in line with the definition in the About section (see above), enter the answer as 'Yes'. <br><br>If the company has not made any such commitment, enter the answer as 'No'. <br><br>From 2024 onwards, <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">'Partial' has been phased out </span>as an answer option.<br><br>Please note: 'Unknown' is not a possible answer for this metric.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 391,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 127,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Policy_Promise_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Public_Commitment_on_Living_Wage_Combined.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Public_Commitment_on_Living_Wage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5768854,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Supplier Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supplier_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Supplier Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company publicly disclose details about their suppliers in alignment with the Transparency Pledge?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project is co-funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative tool called Fashion Checker.<br><br><a href=\"https://fashionchecker.org/\">Fashion Checker</a> enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br><strong>The Transparency Pledge</strong>: The objective of the [[https://transparencypledge.org/|Transparency Pledge]] is to help the garment industry reach a common minimum standard for supply chain disclosures by getting companies to publish standardized, meaningful information on all factories in the manufacturing phase of their supply chains.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company publicly discloses details about their suppliers in alignment with the [[https://transparencypledge.org/|Transparency Pledge]]. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents for a list of suppliers.</p>\r\n<p>The<strong> five disclosure specifications</strong> of the Transparency Pledge are:<br><br><strong>1. Name</strong>: The full name of all authorized production units and processing facilities (Processing factories include printing, embroidery, laundry, and so on)<br><strong>2. Address</strong>: The site addresses<br><strong>3. Parent company</strong>: The parent company of the business at the site<br><strong>4. Product type</strong>: Type of products made (apparel, footwear, home textile, accessories)<br><strong>5. Worker number</strong>: Worker numbers at each site (ranges are accepted)<br><br><strong>Keywords and Search Terms</strong><br><br>- Supplier list<br>- Vendor list<br>- Supply chain<br><br><strong>Answer Input</strong><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information.<br><br>If the company publishes a supplier disclosure in alignment with <strong>all five disclosure specifications</strong> of the Transparency Pledge, enter the answer as 'Yes'. <br><br>If the company publishes a supplier disclosure in alignment with <strong>some, but not all, of the five disclosure specifications</strong> of the Transparency Pledge, enter the answer as 'Partial'. <br><br>If the company has <strong>not made any such disclosure</strong>, enter the answer as 'No'. <br><br>Please note: 'Unknown' is not a possible answer for this metric.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List, Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Clean Clothes Campaign+Supplier Disclosure+Clean Clothes Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 271,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 142,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supplier_Disclosure+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Supplier_List_all.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supplier_Disclosure_combined.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supplier_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5768863,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Open Format for Supply Chain Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Open_Format_for_Supply_Chain_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Open Format for Supply Chain Disclosure",
      "question": "<p>Does the company make its supply chain disclosure available in a downloadable or open data format?</p>",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project is co-funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative tool called Fashion Checker.<br><br><a href=\"https://fashionchecker.org/\">Fashion Checker</a> enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company makes its supply chain disclosures available in a downloadable or open data format. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents for the company's supply chain disclosures. This might be a supply chain report or a list of suppliers. </p>\r\n<p>An open format includes <strong>csv</strong>, <strong>json</strong> and <strong>xlsx</strong>. Publishing a list on <strong><a href=\"https://opensupplyhub.org/\">Open Supply Hub</a> </strong>automatically means the list is available in an open format.</p>\r\n<p><br><strong>Keywords and Search Terms</strong><br><br>- Supply chain<br>- Supply chain disclosure<br>- Supplier list<br><br><strong>Answer Input</strong><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information. <br><br>If the company does publish their supply chain disclosures in a downloadable or open data format, enter the answer as 'Yes'. You can find out about types of open data format for supplier disclosures at odsas.org. They include csv, json and xlsx.  If the company publishes their supplier list on Open Supply Hub, this is also a 'Yes'. <br><br>If the company does not publish their disclosures in a downloadable or open data format, enter the answer as 'No'. <br><br>Please note: 'Unknown' is not a possible answer for this metric.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List, Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Clean Clothes Campaign+Open Format for Supply Chain Disclosure+Clean Clothes Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 259,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 132,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Open_Format_for_Supply_Chain_Disclosure+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Open_Format_for_Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Combined.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Open_Format_for_Supply_Chain_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5768872,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Transparency Beyond Basic Pledge Standard",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Transparency_Beyond_Basic_Pledge_Standard.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Transparency Beyond Basic Pledge Standard",
      "question": "Does the company provide extra information, for instance gender and migrant composition of the workforce or trade union recognition",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company provides extra information about their supply chain. This extra information might include gender and migrant compositions of their workforce, or trade union recognition. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents for the company's supply chain disclosures. This might be a supply chain report or a list of suppliers. <br><br><strong>Keywords and Search Terms</strong><br><br>- Gender<br>- Migrant worker<br>- Trade union / collective bargaining<br>- Supply chain disclosure<br>- Supplier list<br><br><strong>Answer Input</strong><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information. <br><br>If the company does publish extra information about their supply chain, enter the answer as 'Yes'. Make sure you write in the comments what this extra information is and where you found it in the source. <br><br>If the company does not publish extra information about their supply chain, enter the answer as 'No'. <br><br>Please note: 'Unknown' is not a possible answer for this metric.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List, Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Clean Clothes Campaign+Transparency Beyond Basic Pledge Standard+Clean Clothes Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 258,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 132,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Transparency_Beyond_Basic_Pledge_Standard+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Transparency_Beyond_Basic_Pledge_Standard_Combined.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Transparency_Beyond_Basic_Pledge_Standard+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5768881,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Living Wage Action Plan",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wage_Action_Plan.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Living Wage Action Plan",
      "question": "<p>Does the company have a public time bound action plan to pay living wage in their supply chain?</p>",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, Fashion Checker, is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative transparency tool.<br><br><a href=\"https://fashionchecker.org/\">Fashion Checker</a> enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>Clean Clothes Campaign defines a living wage as wage that is <em>earned in a standard working week of no more than 48 hours and allows the garment worker to be able to buy food for herself and her family, pay the rent, pay for healthcare, clothing, transportation and education and have a small amount of savings for when something unexpected happens.</em></p>\r\n<p>(Source: <a href=\"https://cleanclothes.org/faq/pay-living-wages\">CCC</a>)</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company has a public time bound action plan to pay living wages to its workers. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents, annual reports and sustainability reports.</p>\r\n<p>The public action plan or strategy <strong>must describe</strong> how the company will achieve a living wage that (1) covers all workers in the brand’s supplier network (2) within a reasonable time frame (=no more than 5 years).<br><br><strong>Keywords and Search Terms</strong><br><br>- Living wage<br>- Wages<br>- Supply chain<br><br><strong>Answer Input</strong><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information. <br><br>If the company has published a time-bound, public action plan describing how it will achieve a living wage for workers in its supply chain, enter the answer as 'Yes'. <br><br>If the company has no public plan describing how to improve wages for workers across its supplier network, enter the answer as 'No'.<br><br>From 2024 onwards, <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">'Partial' has been phased out</span> as an answer option.<br><br>Please note: 'Unknown' is not a possible answer for this metric.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document, Corporate Social Responsibility Report, Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 391,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 127,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Policy_Promise_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wage_Action_Plan_Combined.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wage_Action_Plan+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5768890,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Current Supply Chain Wages",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Current_Supply_Chain_Wages.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Current Supply Chain Wages",
      "question": "Does the company disclose information about current supply chain wages?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company discloses information about current wages in their supply chain. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents, annual reports and sustainability reports.<br><br><strong>Keywords and Search Terms</strong><br><br>- Wages<br>- Salary<br>- Pay<br>- Supply chain<br><br><strong>Answer Input</strong><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information. <br><br>If the company does disclose information about current wages in their supply chain, enter the type(s) of disclosure that they publish: <br><br>- Aggregate data about wage compliance<br>- Aggregate data about wages at suppliers, per country<br>- Lowest wages per supplier<br>- Wages per supplier, by gender<br>- Other wage data<br><br>If the company does not disclose information about current wages in their supply chain, enter the answer as 'No'. <br><br>Please note: 'Unknown' is not a possible answer for this metric.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Aggregate data about wage compliance",
        "Aggregate data about wages at suppliers, per country",
        "Lowest wages per supplier",
        "Wages per supplier, by gender",
        "Other wage data",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document, Corporate Social Responsibility Report, Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 203,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 125,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Current_Supply_Chain_Wages+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5768899,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Uses Living Wage Benchmark",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Uses_Living_Wage_Benchmark.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Uses Living Wage Benchmark",
      "question": "Does the company use any living wage benchmark(s)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, Fashion Checker, is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative transparency tool.<br><br><a href=\"https://fashionchecker.org/\">Fashion Checker</a> enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>Clean Clothes Campaign defines a living wage as wage that is <em>earned in a standard working week of no more than 48 hours and allows the garment worker to be able to buy food for herself and her family, pay the rent, pay for healthcare, clothing, transportation and education and have a small amount of savings for when something unexpected happens.</em></p>\r\n<p>(Source: <a href=\"https://cleanclothes.org/faq/pay-living-wages\">CCC</a>)</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company uses any living wage benchmarks. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents, annual reports and sustainability reports.</p>\r\n<p>Living wage benchmarks are independently calculated, location-specific thresholds representing the exact income a worker needs to afford a decent standard of living, including food, housing, childcare, healthcare, and unexpected events.<br><br><strong>Keywords and Search Terms</strong><br><br>- Wages<br>- Supply chain<br>- Asia Floor Wage<br>- Global Living Wage Coalition / Anker<br>- Fair Wear Foundation Wage Ladder<br>- Fair Labor Association (FLA) Wage Ladder<br><br><strong>Answer Input</strong><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information. <br><br>If the company does use one or more living wage benchmarks, select the benchmark(s) from the list: <br><br>- Yes, Asia Floor Wage<br>- Yes, Global Living Wage Coalition (Anker)<br>- Yes, Fair Wear Foundation Wage Ladders<br>- Yes, FLA Wage Ladders<br>- Yes, other<br><br>If you select the answer 'Yes, other', please explain in the comments what this living wage benchmark is. <br><br>If the company does not use any living wage benchmarks, enter the answer as 'No'. <br><br>Please note: 'Unknown' is not a possible answer for this metric.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes Asia Floor Wage",
        "Yes Global Living Wage Coalition (Anker)",
        "Yes Fair Wear Foundation Wage Ladders",
        "Yes FLA Wage Ladders",
        "Yes Wage Indicator",
        "Yes Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document, Corporate Social Responsibility Report, Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 208,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 131,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Uses_Living_Wage_Benchmark_Combined.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Uses_Living_Wage_Benchmark+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5768908,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Quantity of Suppliers Paying Living Wage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Quantity_of_Suppliers_Paying_Living_Wage.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Quantity of Suppliers Paying Living Wage",
      "question": "What percentage of its suppliers is paying the company's stated living wage?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, Fashion Checker, is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative transparency tool. <br><br><a href=\"https://fashionchecker.org/\">Fashion Checker</a> enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>Clean Clothes Campaign defines a living wage as wage that is <em>earned in a standard working week of no more than 48 hours and allows the garment worker to be able to buy food for herself and her family, pay the rent, pay for healthcare, clothing, transportation and education and have a small amount of savings for when something unexpected happens</em> (Source: <a href=\"https://cleanclothes.org/faq/pay-living-wages\">CCC</a>)</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking for the percentage of the company's suppliers who pay the company's stated living wage. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents, annual reports and sustainability reports.<br><br><strong>Keywords and Search Terms</strong><br><br>- Living wage<br>- Supply chain<br>- Supplier list<br><br><strong>Answer Input</strong><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information. <br><br>If the company does disclose the percentage of its suppliers paying their workers the company's stated living wage, select the percentage range from the list: <br><br>- 0<br>- &gt; 1%<br>- &gt; 25%<br>- &gt; 50%<br>- 100<br><br>If the company does not disclose the percentage of its suppliers paying their workers the company's stated living wage, enter the answer as 'Unknown'.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "0%",
        "> 1%",
        "> 25%",
        "> 50%",
        "100%"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document, Corporate Social Responsibility Report, Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 93,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 52,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Quantity_of_Suppliers_Paying_Living_Wage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5768917,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Isolating Labour Cost",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Isolating_Labour_Cost.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Isolating Labour Cost",
      "question": "Does the company have a method for isolating labour cost?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.<br><br><strong>Labour Cost</strong>: Labour cost is the cost incurred by the employer in the employment of labour. This comprises remuneration for work performed, payments in respect of time paid for but not worked, bonuses and gratuities, the cost of food, drink and other payments in kind, cost of workers’ housing borne by employers, employers’ social security expenditures, cost to the employer for vocational training, welfare services and miscellaneous items, such as transport of workers, work clothes and recruitment, together with taxes regarded as labour cost. (Source: [[https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=1484|ILO]])</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company has a method for isolating labour cost. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents, annual reports and sustainability reports. You can also search on the [[https://actonlivingwages.com/|ACT]] and [[https://www.fairwear.org/|Fair Wear Foundation]] websites.<br><br><strong>Keywords and Search Terms</strong><br><br>- Labour cost<br>- Supply chain<br>- Fair Wear Foundation<br>- ACT<br><br><strong>Answer Input</strong><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information. <br><br>If the company does have a method for isolating labour cost, select the method type from the list: <br><br>- Yes, Fair Wear Foundation<br>- Yes, ACT<br>- Yes, other<br><br>If the company does not use any living wage benchmarks, enter the answer as 'No'. <br><br>Please note: 'Unknown' is not a possible answer for this metric.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes, Fair Wear Foundation",
        "Yes, ACT",
        "Yes, Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document, Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 380,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 127,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Policy_Promise_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Isolating_Labour_Cost_Combined.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Isolating_Labour_Cost+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5768926,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Addressing Gender Pay Gap in Supply Chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Addressing_Gender_Pay_Gap_in_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Addressing Gender Pay Gap in Supply Chain",
      "question": "<p>What does the company disclose on addressing the gender pay gap in its supply chain?</p>",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.<br><br><strong>Gender pay gap</strong>: The difference in average gross earnings between women and men. (Source: [[europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20200109STO69925/understanding-the-gender-pay-gap-definition-and-causes|European Parliament]])</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company discloses information on addressing the gender pay gap in its supply chain. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents, annual reports and sustainability reports.<br><br><strong>Keywords and Search Terms</strong><br><br>- Gender pay gap<br>- Gender wage gap<br>- Wage breakdown<br>- Supply chain<br><br><strong>Answer Input</strong><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information. <br><br>If the company does disclose information on addressing the gender pay gap in its supply chain, enter the type(s) of disclosure that they publish: <br><br>- Publishes information on gender breakdown in its supplier factories;<br>- Publishes information on gender pay gaps in its supplier factories;<br>- Publicly reports on programmes/methodologies to address gender pay gaps in supplier factories<br><br>If the company does not disclose information about current wages in their supply chain, enter the answer as 'No public disclosure'. <br><br>Please note: 'Unknown' is not a possible answer for this metric.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Publishes information on gender breakdown in its supplier factories",
        "Publishes information on gender pay gaps in its supplier factories",
        "Publicly reports on programmes/methodologies to address gender pay gaps in supplier factories",
        "No public disclosure"
      ],
      "report_type": "Gender Pay Gap Report, Supply Chain Policy document, Corporate Social Responsibility Report, Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 208,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 132,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Addressing_Gender_Pay_Gap_in_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5768935,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Top 3 Production Countries",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Top_3_Production_Countries.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Top 3 Production Countries",
      "question": "What are the company's top 3 production countries (by volume of products sourced)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking for the company's top three production countries (by volume of products sourced). Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents, annual reports and sustainability reports.<br><br><strong>Keywords and Search Terms</strong><br><br>- Production<br>- Country<br>- Supplier location<br><br><strong>Answer Input</strong><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information. <br><br>If the company does disclose their top three production countries, select the countries from the list. The company may supply from fewer than three countries, in that case you can select one or two countries. <br><br>If the company does not disclose their top three production countries, enter the answer as 'Unknown'.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Armenia",
        "Bangladesh",
        "Belgium",
        "Bosnia and Herzegovina",
        "Brazil",
        "Bulgaria",
        "Cambodia",
        "China",
        "Czech Republic",
        "Estonia",
        "India",
        "Indonesia",
        "Italy",
        "Laos",
        "Lithuania",
        "Madagascar",
        "Morocco",
        "Mexico",
        "Myanmar",
        "North Macedonia",
        "Pakistan",
        "Portugal",
        "Romania",
        "Thailand",
        "Tunisia",
        "Turkey",
        "United Kingdom",
        "Vietnam",
        "Germany",
        "Greece",
        "Taiwan"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List, Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 128,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 111,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Top_3_Production_Countries+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5780245,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Number of Tier 1 Suppliers in Supplier List",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Number_of_Tier_1_Suppliers_in_Supplier_List.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Number of Tier 1 Suppliers in Supplier List",
      "question": "How many tier 1 suppliers does the company account for its Supplier List?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool.<br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">This metric is asking for the number of the company's tier 1 suppliers. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents, annual reports and sustainability reports.<br><br></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold;\">Keywords and Search Terms<br></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"><br>- Suppliers<br>- Supplier list<br>- Tier 1<br><br></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold;\">Answer Input<br></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information.<br><br>If the company does disclose their suppliers, enter the number of tier 1 suppliers as the answer. In the comments, include the company's definition of a tier 1 and a tier 2 supplier.<br><br>If the company does not disclose their tier 1 suppliers, enter the answer as 'Unknown'.<br></span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Tier 1 Suppliers",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Quantity_of_Tier_1_Suppliers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Number_of_Tier_1_Suppliers_in_Supplier_List+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5780256,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Number of Tier 2 Suppliers in Supplier List",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Number_of_Tier_2_Suppliers_in_Supplier_List.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Number of Tier 2 Suppliers in Supplier List",
      "question": "How many tier 2 suppliers does the company account for its Supplier List?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool.<br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">This metric is asking for the number of the company's tier 2 suppliers. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents, annual reports and sustainability reports.<br><br></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold;\">Keywords and Search Terms<br></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"><br>- Suppliers<br>- Supplier list<br>- Tier 2<br><br></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold;\">Answer Input<br></span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information.<br><br>If the company does disclose their suppliers, enter the number of tier 2 suppliers as the answer. In the comments, include the company's definition of a tier 1 and a tier 2 supplier.<br><br>If the company does not disclose their tier 2 suppliers, enter the answer as 'Unknown'.<br></span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Tier 2 Suppliers",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Quantity_of_Tier_2_Suppliers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Number_of_Tier_2_Suppliers_in_Supplier_List+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5780267,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Revenue (EUR)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Revenue_EUR.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Revenue (EUR)",
      "question": "What was the company's total revenue for the year (in EUR)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project is co-funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative tool called Fashion Checker.<br><br><a href=\"https://fashionchecker.org/\">Fashion Checker</a> enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking for the total revenue of the company in a specific year. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as annual reports and sustainability reports.<br><br><strong>Keywords and Search Terms</strong><br><br>- Revenue<br>- Sales<br>- Direct economic value<br>- Financials<br>- Key data<br><br><strong>Answer Input</strong><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information.<br><br>If you have looked for the information and have not been able to find it, enter the answer as ‘Unknown’.<br><br><strong>Units</strong><br><br>The <strong>reporting unit is Euros</strong>. If the value is reported in a different currency please consult [[https://commission.europa.eu/funding-tenders/procedures-guidelines-tenders/information-contractors-and-beneficiaries/exchange-rate-inforeuro_en|this currency converter]] to find the conversion rate to use according to the company's reporting year. Once you have found the correct conversion rate, multiply that number by your answer to get the EUR rate. Include this calculation in your comments.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "EUR",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 214,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 130,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Core+Revenue_EUR.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Revenue_EUR+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5780278,
      "name": "Core+Profit (EUR)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Profit_EUR.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Profit (EUR)",
      "question": "What was the company's total profit for the year (in EUR)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Profit is the amount left after expenses have been paid during a reporting period. The entirety of money collected by a company is its revenue and profit is this revenue minus the cost of sales/expenses. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking for the total profit of the company in a specific year. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as annual reports and sustainability reports.<br><br><strong>Keywords and Search Terms</strong><br><br>- Profit<br>- Margin<br>- Financials<br>- Key data<br><br><strong>Answer Input</strong><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information.<br><br>If you have looked for the information and have not been able to find it, enter the answer as ‘Unknown’.<br><br><strong>Units</strong><br><br>The reporting unit is Euros. If the value is reported in a different currency please consult [[https://commission.europa.eu/funding-tenders/procedures-guidelines-tenders/information-contractors-and-beneficiaries/exchange-rate-inforeuro_en|this currency converter]] to find the conversion rate to use according to the company's reporting year. Once you have found the correct conversion rate, multiply that number by your answer to get the EUR rate. Include this calculation in your comments.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "EUR",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 191,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 126,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Profit_EUR+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5780291,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Supplier Disclosure+Clean Clothes Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supplier_Disclosure+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Supplier Disclosure",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 273,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 144,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supplier_Disclosure+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5780408,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Open Format for Supply Chain Disclosure+Clean Clothes Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Open_Format_for_Supply_Chain_Disclosure+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Open Format for Supply Chain Disclosure",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 261,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 134,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Open_Format_for_Supply_Chain_Disclosure+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5780522,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Transparency Beyond Basic Pledge Standard+Clean Clothes Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Transparency_Beyond_Basic_Pledge_Standard+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Transparency Beyond Basic Pledge Standard",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 260,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 134,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Transparency_Beyond_Basic_Pledge_Standard+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5780639,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Supply Chain Transparency Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Transparency_Score.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Supply Chain Transparency Score",
      "question": "What score did the company receive for supply chain transparency? ",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|<em>Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency</em>]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool.<br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.</p>\r\n<h2>Scoring in detail:</h2>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>The brand does not disclose any information about its suppliers: <strong>1 star</strong></li>\r\n<li>The brand discloses a full list of facilities including facility name and address: <strong>2 stars</strong></li>\r\n<li>The brand discloses a full list of facilities including facility name, address, parent company and product/service type: <strong>3 stars</strong></li>\r\n<li>The brand discloses a full list of facilities including facility name, address, parent company and product/service type in a machine readable format*: <strong>4 stars</strong></li>\r\n<li>The brand discloses a full list of facilities including facility name, address, parent company and product/service type in a machine readable format AND discloses the lowest average wage at facility-level*: <strong>5 stars</strong></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><em>* </em><em>A downloadable format could be Excel, Json, CSV.</em></p>\r\n<p><strong>Please note:</strong> in the Transparency Tool, this Transparency Score is represented a 4 point scale. However, here the score is represented on a 10 point scale, for the sake of comparability and compatibility with other assessment frameworks hosted on Wikirate.org This means a \"1\" score in the Transparency Tool is equivalent to a \"2.5\" score here.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7733755",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7733759",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22334497",
          "weight": 25
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1567,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 361,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Transparency_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5780757,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Policy Promise Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Policy_Promise_Score.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Policy Promise Score",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, <a href=\"https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap\" target=\"_blank\">Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency</a>, is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool.<br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if ((m1 === \"Yes\") && (m2 === \"Yes\") && m3.match(/^Yes/)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if ((m1 === \"No\") && (m2 === \"No\") && (m3 === \"No\")) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partial\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5768845",
          "unknown": "No"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5768881",
          "unknown": "No"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~5768917",
          "unknown": "No"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 382,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 129,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Policy_Promise_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5781910,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Number of Tier 1 Suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Number_of_Tier_1_Suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Number of Tier 1 Suppliers",
      "question": "<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\">How many tier 1 suppliers does the company have?</span></p>",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool.<br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">T</span></span>his metric is asking for the number of the company's tier 1 suppliers. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents, annual reports and sustainability reports.<br><br><strong>Keywords and Search Terms</strong><br><br>- Suppliers<br>- Supplier list<br>- Tier 1<br><br><strong>Answer Input</strong><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information.<br><br>If the company does disclose their suppliers, enter the number of tier 1 suppliers as the answer. In the comments, include the company's definition of a tier 1 and a tier 2 supplier.<br><br>If the company does not disclose their tier 1 suppliers, enter the answer as 'Unknown'.<span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"><br></span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Tier 1 Suppliers",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 123,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Quantity_of_Tier_1_Suppliers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Number_of_Tier_1_Suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5781917,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Number of Tier 2 Suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Number_of_Tier_2_Suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Number of Tier 2 Suppliers",
      "question": "How many tier 2 suppliers does the company have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool.<br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking for the number of the company's tier 2 suppliers. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents, annual reports and sustainability reports.<br><br><strong>Keywords and Search Terms</strong><br><br>- Suppliers<br>- Supplier list<br>- Tier 2<br><br><strong>Answer Input</strong><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information.<br><br>If the company does disclose their suppliers, enter the number of tier 2 suppliers as the answer. In the comments, include the company's definition of a tier 1 and a tier 2 supplier.<br><br>If the company does not disclose their tier 2 suppliers, enter the answer as 'Unknown'.<span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"><br></span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Tier 2 Suppliers",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 117,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 109,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Quantity_of_Tier_2_Suppliers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Number_of_Tier_2_Suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5781955,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Quantity of Tier 1 Suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Quantity_of_Tier_1_Suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Quantity of Tier 1 Suppliers",
      "question": "How many tier 1 suppliers does the company have?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool.<br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Tier 1 Suppliers",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5781910"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5780245"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 124,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Quantity_of_Tier_1_Suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5781964,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Quantity of Tier 2 Suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Quantity_of_Tier_2_Suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Quantity of Tier 2 Suppliers",
      "question": "How many tier 2 suppliers does the company have?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool.<br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Tier 2 Suppliers",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5781917"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5780256"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 118,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Quantity_of_Tier_2_Suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5809535,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Fashion Transparency Index 2020",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2020.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Fashion Transparency Index 2020",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index 2020? ",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Fashion Transparency Index 2020 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This year for the first time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5975428",
          "weight": "18.8"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5976190",
          "weight": "4.8"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5978738",
          "weight": "31.6"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5978992",
          "weight": "25.2"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5974669",
          "weight": "19.6"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 10,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2020+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821698,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.1 Own Operations Policies",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_1_Own_Operations_Policies.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.1 Own Operations Policies",
      "question": "What are the company’s human rights and environmental policies?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "These policies evidence the company's operating guidelines and outline the standards that must be implemented across the company's activities. Policies are a way for a company to communicate its commitments to human rights, social impacts and environmental protection. If they have policies in place we know they are considering these topics within their business.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify the company's human rights and environmental policies. Start by searching within published documents which set out the company's human rights standards and environmental standards (as related to its own company operations in its head offices, stores, warehouses, and owned production facilities)<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Employee Handbook (if publicly available)<br>- Careers section of the company website<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Animal Welfare<br>- Annual Leave &amp; Public Holidays<br>- Anti-bribery, &amp; Corruption &amp; Presentation of False Information<br>- Biodiversity &amp; Conservation<br>- Child Labour <br>- Community Engagement<br>- Contracts &amp; Terms of Employment<br>- Discrimination<br>- Diversity &amp; Inclusion <br>- Effluents<br>- Energy &amp; Carbon Emissions<br>- Equal Pay <br>- Forced or Bonded Labour<br>- Foreign &amp; Migrant Labour <br>- Freedom of Association, Right to Organise &amp; Collective Bargaining<br>- Harassment &amp; Violence<br>- Health &amp; Safety<br>- Living Conditions/Dormitories<br>- Maternity Rights &amp; Parental Leave <br>- Notice Period, Dismissal &amp; Disciplinary Action<br>- Overtime Pay<br>- Restricted Substance List<br>- Sub-contracting, Outsourcing &amp; Homeworkers<br>- Wages &amp; Financial Benefits (e.g. bonuses, insurance, social security, pensions)<br>- Waste &amp; Recycling (Textiles) <br>- Waste &amp; Recycling (Other) <br>- Water Effluents &amp; Treatment<br>- Water Usage &amp; Footprint<br>- Working Hours &amp; Rest Breaks<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Supplier Code of Conducts do not count toward this metric question, unless they explicitly state that they apply to the company's own employees.<br>- Some of the policies in this section can be found in an Employee Handbook, if publicly available, or sometimes in the Careers section of the website.<br>- Environmental policies are often separate company policies, not included in an Employee Handbook.<br>- Restricted Substance List itself must be published, not sufficient if they just say that they have a RSL in place.<br>- For Waste &amp; Recycling (Textiles), we are looking specific for policies on off-cuts and textile wastage or policy on waste resulting from defective stock or production samples. <br>- Equal Pay policy can sometimes be found within a discrimination policy. The discrimination policy must explicitly state that it includes pay/remuneration and gender/sex<br>- Biodiversity and Conservation policy can include deforestation and forest-based fibre policies<br>- Banning the use of any animal derived fibre isn't sufficient for points for Animal Welfare. We are looking for a policy such as the Five Freedoms approach, which covers issues such as husbandry and use of animal derived materials.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Animal Welfare",
        "Annual Leave & Public Holidays",
        "Anti-bribery Corruption & Presentation of False Information",
        "Biodiversity & Conservation",
        "Community Engagement",
        "Contracts & Terms of Employment",
        "Discrimination",
        "Diversity & Inclusion",
        "Energy & Carbon Emissions",
        "Equal Pay",
        "Freedom of Association Right to Organise & Collective Bargaining",
        "Harassment & Violence",
        "Health & Safety",
        "Maternity Rights & Parental Leave",
        "Mental Health & Wellbeing (2021 only)",
        "Notice Period Dismissal & Disciplinary Action",
        "Restricted Substance List",
        "Wages & Financial Benefits (e.g. bonuses/insurance/social security/pensions)",
        "Waste & Recycling (Packaging/Office/Retail)",
        "Waste & Recycling (Product/Textiles)",
        "Water Usage & Footprint",
        "Working Hours & Rest Breaks",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+1.1 Own Operations Policies+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
        "Fashion Revolution+1.1 Own Operations Policies+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 11,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_1_Own_Operations_Policies+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_1_Own_Operations_Policies+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Annual_leave_and_public_holidays_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Energy_and_carbon_emissions_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_effluents_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_usage_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_and_recycling_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Contracts_and_terms_of_employment_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Maternity_rights_and_parental_leave_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Notice_period_and_dismissal_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Wages_and_financial_benefits_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Discrimination_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Diversity_and_inclusion_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Harassment_and_violence_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Health_and_safety_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Working_hours_and_rest_breaks_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Anti_corruption_bribery_and_presentation_of_false_information_policy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_1_Own_Operations_Policies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821708,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Supply Chain Policies",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Supply Chain Policies",
      "question": "What are the company’s vendor/supplier policies covering human rights and environmental standards across the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Policies outline the minimum human rights and environmental standards that companies require their vendors and partners to implement throughout the supply chain. Having supplier policies in place shows that the company takes some responsibility for the practises that happen within its supply chain.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify the company’s vendor/supplier policies covering human rights and environmental standards across the supply chain. Start by searching for published documents which set out the minimum human rights and environmental standards expected by the company for suppliers and/or vendors. <br><br><strong>Documents to look for include:</strong><br>- Code of Conduct<br>- Terms of Engagement<br>- Supplier Guidebook<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>NB: Code of Ethics that typically apply to the previous metric question (looking at policies that apply to the company's own operations) and do not count in this metric question, unless they explicitly state that the policies apply to suppliers. <br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Animal Welfare<br>- Annual Leave &amp; Public Holidays<br>- Anti-bribery, &amp; Corruption &amp; Presentation of False Information<br>- Biodiversity &amp; Conservation<br>- Child Labour <br>- Community Engagement<br>- Contracts &amp; Terms of Employment<br>- Discrimination<br>- Effluents<br>- Energy &amp; Carbon Emissions<br>- Equal Pay <br>- Forced or Bonded Labour<br>- Foreign &amp; Migrant Labour <br>- Freedom of Association, Right to Organise &amp; Collective Bargaining<br>- Harassment &amp; Violence<br>- Health &amp; Safety<br>- Living Conditions/Dormitories<br>- Maternity Rights &amp; Parental Leave <br>- Notice Period, Dismissal &amp; Disciplinary Action<br>- Overtime Pay<br>- Restricted Substance List<br>- Sub-contracting, Outsourcing &amp; Homeworkers<br>- Wages &amp; Financial Benefits (e.g. bonuses, insurance, social security, pensions)<br>- Waste &amp; Recycling (Textiles) <br>- Waste &amp; Recycling (Other) <br>- Water Effluents &amp; Treatment<br>- Water Usage &amp; Footprint<br>- Working Hours &amp; Rest Breaks<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- All of these issues must be explicitly stated in any policies.<br>- Business/Company code of conducts only apply if they explicitly state that they also apply to suppliers.<br>- For Waste &amp; Recycling (Textiles), we are looking specific for policies on off-cuts and textile wastage or policy on waste resulting from defective stock or production samples. <br>- Equal Pay policy can sometimes be found within a discrimination policy. The discrimination policy must explicitly state that it includes pay/remuneration and gender/sex<br>- Biodiversity and Conservation policy can include deforestation and forest-based fibre policies<br>- Living Conditions/Dormitories policy can often be found within a health and safety policy</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Annual Leave & Public Holidays",
        "Anti-bribery Corruption & Presentation of False Information",
        "Biodiversity & Conservation",
        "Child Labour",
        "Community Engagement",
        "Contracts & Terms of Employment",
        "Discrimination",
        "Energy & Carbon Emissions",
        "Equal Pay",
        "Forced & Bonded Labour",
        "Foreign & Migrant Labour",
        "Freedom of Association Right to Organise & Collective Bargaining",
        "Harassment & Violence",
        "Health & Safety",
        "Homeworking (2021 only)",
        "Living Conditions/Dormitories",
        "Maternity Rights & Parental Leave",
        "Manufacturing Restricted Substances List (MRSL) (2021 only)",
        "Notice Period Dismissal & Disciplinary Action",
        "Overtime Pay",
        "Sub-contracting Outsourcing & Homeworkers",
        "Sub-contracting (2021 only)",
        "Wages & Financial Benefits (e.g. bonuses/insurance/social security/pensions)",
        "Waste & Recycling (Packaging/Office/Facility)",
        "Waste & Recycling (Product/Textiles)",
        "Water Effluents & Treatment",
        "Water Usage & Footprint",
        "Working Hours & Rest Breaks",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Supply Chain Policies+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
        "Fashion Revolution+Supply Chain Policies+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 11,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Annual_leave_and_public_holidays_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Energy_and_carbon_emissions_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_effluents_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_usage_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_and_recycling_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Contracts_and_terms_of_employment_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Maternity_rights_and_parental_leave_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Notice_period_and_dismissal_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Wages_and_financial_benefits_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Discrimination_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Diversity_and_inclusion_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Harassment_and_violence_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Health_and_safety_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Working_hours_and_rest_breaks_policy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Child_labour_policy_supply_chain.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Forced_and_bonded_labour_policy_supply_chain.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Foreign_and_migrant_labour_policy_supply_chain.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Anti_corruption_bribery_and_presentation_of_false_information_policy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821718,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Supply Chain Policies Align with International Standards",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies_Align_with_International_Standards.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Supply Chain Policies Align with International Standards",
      "question": "Does the company state that its supplier/vendor policies are based on credible international standards such as the Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code, relevant UN and ILO Conventions, UN Global Compact?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Designing policies on credible international standards shows a company’s willingness to align with credible international benchmarks and work collaboratively.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company's supplier/vendor policies are based on credible international standards such as the Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code, relevant UN and ILO Conventions, UN Global Compact. Start by searching for published documents which set out the minimum human rights and environmental standards expected by the company for suppliers and/or vendors that states that they are based on international standards and benchmarks. <br><br><strong>Documents to look for include:</strong><br>- Code of conduct <br>- Terms of engagement <br>- Supplier guidebook<br>- Vendor agreements<br>- Supplier terms of engagement <br>- Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Policies <br>- Vendors/Suppliers<br>- Code of Conduct <br>- Supplier Guidebook<br>- Modern slavery statement<br>- Terms of engagement<br>- International Labour Organisation (ILO)<br>- The Ethical Trading Initiative (ETI) Base Code<br>- UN Global Compact<br>- OECD guidelines <br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- That the benchmarks referred to are recognised and credible such as; The Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code, United Nations frameworks and conventions, International Labour Organisation’s conventions and recommendations</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Supply Chain Policies Align with International Standards+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies_Align_with_International_Standards+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies_Align_with_International_Standards+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821728,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Supply Chain Policies Are Contractual",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies_Are_Contractual.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Supply Chain Policies Are Contractual",
      "question": "Does the company publish whether the policy (or policies) is part of the purchase agreement or if a supplier signature is required?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Requiring a signature on supplier policies or explicitly ensuring that adherence to suppliers policies is part of the contractual trading agreement reinforces the importance of compliance and demonstrates that the company is serious about suppliers' performance on social and environmental issues.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify if the company publishes whether the policy (or policies) is part of the purchase agreement or if a supplier signature is required. Start by searching for a statement that the policy (or policies) is part of a purchasing agreement or requires the suppliers/vendors signature. <br><br><strong>This statement may appear in/on:</strong><br>- The Code of Conduct<br>- The supplier terms of engagement <br>- The supplier guidebook<br>- The vendor agreements<br>- A Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency <br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Act disclosure<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Signature<br>- Sign<br>- Contractual relationship<br>- Purchasing Agreement<br>- Contractually required<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Information should only be used from a parent company documents or website when the brand has linked to the parent company from their own website</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Supply Chain Policies Are Contractual+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies_Are_Contractual+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies_Are_Contractual+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821738,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Supply Chain Policies in Local Language",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies_in_Local_Language.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Supply Chain Policies in Local Language",
      "question": "Does the company publish the supplier / vendor policy (or policies) / Code of Conduct translated into local languages of production and sourcing countries?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Publishing translations of supplier policies/code of conduct in the local languages of the production/sourcing vendors ensures supplier teams and workers are able to fully understand the requirements and can allow workers to better understand their workplace rights.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify if the company states that the supplier/vendor policy (or policies) is translated into local languages. Start by searching for translations of the supplier/vendor policies/Code of Conduct in local languages of production/sourcing countries. <br><br><strong>This may appear in/on:</strong><br>- The Code of Conduct<br>- The supplier terms of engagement <br>- The supplier guidebook<br>- The vendor agreements<br>- In a Corporate Responsibility microsite<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Translations<br>- Languages<br>- Code of Conduct<br>- Policies<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Brands must be publicly publishing the translated documents to receive the point not just stating that translations are available</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Supply Chain Policies in Local Language+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies_in_Local_Language+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies_in_Local_Language+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821748,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.3 Management Procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Management_Procedures.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.3 Management Procedures",
      "question": "Which of the company’s human rights and environmental policies are reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "These management procedures identify how the company is putting its policies into action. It is important for a company to have procedures that apply to their suppliers and own employees. This shows that they are working to uphold their commitments to human rights, social impacts and environmental protection and that the company takes some steps to improve practises across the company and/or the supply chain.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company's human rights and environmental policies are reflected in their management procedures. Start by searching for published documents which detail the human rights standards and environmental procedures within their own operations and in their supply chains. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Animal Welfare<br>- Annual Leave &amp; Public Holidays<br>- Anti-bribery, &amp; Corruption &amp; Presentation of False Information<br>- Biodiversity &amp; Conservation<br>- Child Labour <br>- Community Engagement<br>- Contracts &amp; Terms of Employment<br>- Discrimination<br>- Diversity &amp; Inclusion <br>- Effluents<br>- Emissions, Energy &amp; Carbon Emissions<br>- Equal Pay <br>- Forced or Bonded Labour<br>- Foreign &amp; Migrant Labour <br>- Freedom of Association, Right to Organise &amp; Collective Bargaining<br>- Harassment &amp; Violence<br>- Health &amp; Safety<br>- Living Conditions/Dormitories<br>- Maternity Rights &amp; Parental Leave <br>- Notice Period, Dismissal &amp; Disciplinary Action<br>- Overtime Pay<br>- Restricted Substance List<br>- Sub-contracting, Outsourcing &amp; Homeworkers<br>- Wages &amp; Financial Benefits (e.g. bonuses, insurance, social security, pensions)<br>- Waste &amp; Recycling (Textiles) <br>- Waste &amp; Recycling (Other) <br>- Water Effluents &amp; Treatment<br>- Water Usage &amp; Footprint<br>- Working Hours &amp; Rest Breaks<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Information should only be used from a parent company documents or website when the brand has linked to the parent company from their own website.<br>- Simply auditing for compliance is not enough <br>- Reports published after Jan 15<br>- Animal Welfare procedure could be participation in the Leather Working Group, Responsible Down Standard, Responsible Wool Standard, Peta certification, etc. <br>- Annual Leave and Public holidays procedure could be evidence of a system in place that ensures employees actually receive annual leave. This could be a record system to track employees annual leave or an annual leave approval system. <br>- Anti-bribery procedure could be something like dedicated training for employees/workers on bribery and corruption or a dedicated hotline for employees/workers to report bribery, corruption, fraud.<br>- Biodiversity &amp; Conservation procedure could be working with FSC or Canopy to ensure sources of cellulose-based fibres are not contributing to biodiversity loss, by ensuring that exotic plants and leather adhere to the CITES convention or by restoring soil health and increasing biodiversity through regenerative agriculture.<br>- Child labour procedure could be evidence of due diligence, partnerships or programs that work to eliminate child labour. <br>- Community engagement procedure could be evidence of partnerships and programs that support communities in the areas impacted by the company<br>- Contracts &amp; Terms of Employment procedure could be ensuring all contracts are in the local language, are signed by both parties and that employees are given a copy of the contract. <br>- Discrimination procedure could be evidence of partnerships and/or specific programs that seek to prevent, mitigate or remedy discrimination. <br>- Diversity &amp; Inclusion procedure could be evidence of partnerships and/or specific programs that fosters diversity and inclusion.<br>- Energy &amp; Carbon Emissions procedure could be the implementation of any energy-saving and reduction initiatives or how they proactively work to reduce their carbon emissions. Brand could receive points for being a part of UN Fashion Charter for Climate Action or the G7 Pact.<br>- Equal Pay procedure could be evidence of work beyond a policy to ensure equal pay; could be evidence of training on this issue, partnerships or specific programs that address this topic explicitly.<br>- Forced and Bonded Labour procedure could be evidence of due diligence, partnerships or programs that work to eliminate forced and bonded labour - the type of procedural information which might be include in a UK Modern Slavery Act or California Transparency in Supply Chains Act statement.<br>- For Foreign &amp; Migrant Labour procedure, we are looking for evidence of due diligence, partnerships or programs that work to support migrant workers within their supply chain such as the AAFA/FLA Apparel &amp; Footwear Industry Commitment to Responsible Recruitment. <br>- Freedom of Association, Right to Organise &amp; Collective Bargaining procedure could be via a Global Framework Agreement or partnerships that proactively support freedom of association and CB such as ACT, Indonesia Protocol or partnerships with local unions.<br>- Harassment &amp; Violence procedure could include initiatives such as training for factory managers and workers, dedicated hotline to anonymously report harassment/abuse/violence and other sensitisation type activities.<br>- For a Health &amp; Safety procedure, we are looking for how health and safety policies are put into practice such as topical training for workers.<br>- For Living Conditions/Dormitories procedure, we are looking for programs in supplier facilities focused on improving conditions in hostels/dormitories where workers are living onsite. For example, supporting hostel registration or providing provisions to increase quality of life for workers living in hostels/dormitories.<br>- For Maternity Rights &amp; Parental Leave, we are looking for procedures and programs that seek to protect maternity rights and ensure parental leave for employees. For example, schemes that allow employees to work remotely or part-time after returning from maternity leave.<br>- Notice Period, Dismissal &amp; Disciplinary Action procedure could be any evidence of work beyond a policy to prevent unreasonable dismissals or disciplinary action. This could be a clear disciplinary procedure which is communicated to employees and accompanied by clear documentation.<br>- For Overtime Pay procedure, we are looking for initiatives or procedures that manage overtime pay for employees. This could be documentation of overtime hours and pay through an overtime management system.<br>- Restricted Substance List procedure could be evidence of testing, e.g. working with ZDHC programme (if link to ZDHC provided)<br>- For Sub-contracting, Outsourcing &amp; Homeworkers procedure, we are looking for evidence of partnerships and specific programs that seek to address and support better homeworking practices or traceability of sub-contracting. <br>- For Wages &amp; Benefits (e.g. bonuses, insurance, social security, pensions), we are looking for evidence of partnerships and programs that proactively support improving wages and benefits. For example, ACT membership, Fair Wear Foundation’s Fair Wage Ladder, calculating and benchmarking wages using Anker or Asia Floor Wage. Or, it could be by providing detailed information about wage management systems.<br>- Waste &amp; Recycling (Packaging/Office/Facility/Retail) procedure could include initiatives or procedures that are in action to reduce/reuse waste such as paper, plastic and glass, packaging, etc.<br>- Waste &amp; Recycling (Product/Textiles) procedure could be initiatives or practices that reduce/reuse/repurpose off-cuts and textile wastage, defective stock, production samples and/or post-consumer waste.<br>- Water Effluents &amp; Treatment procedure could be working with ZDHC programme is sufficient (if link to ZDHC provided)<br>- Water Usage &amp; Footprint could be initiatives or procedures that are in action to reduce/minimise the use of water in business or supplier activities.<br>- For Working Hours &amp; Rest Breaks, we are looking for initiatives or procedures that ensure workers/employees receive an adequate number of paid rest breaks for a healthy person within normal working hours. Or, initiatives or procedures that ensure workers/employees are working normal, legal hours in a day.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Animal Welfare",
        "Annual Leave & Public Holidays",
        "Anti-bribery Corruption & Presentation of False Information",
        "Biodiversity & Conservation",
        "Child Labour",
        "Community Engagement",
        "Contracts & Terms of Employment",
        "Discrimination",
        "Diversity & Inclusion",
        "Energy & Carbon Emissions",
        "Equal Pay",
        "Forced & Bonded Labour",
        "Foreign & Migrant Labour",
        "Freedom of Association Right to Organise & Collective Bargaining",
        "Harassment & Violence",
        "Health & Safety",
        "Homeworking (2021 only)",
        "Living Conditions/Dormitories",
        "Maternity Rights & Parental Leave",
        "Manufacturing Restricted Substances List (MRSL) (2021 only)",
        "Mental Health & Wellbeing (2021 only)",
        "Notice Period Dismissal & Disciplinary Action",
        "Overtime Pay",
        "Restricted Substance List",
        "Sub-contracting Outsourcing & Homeworkers",
        "Sub-contracting (2021 only)",
        "Wages & Financial Benefits (e.g. bonuses/insurance/social security/pensions)",
        "Waste & Recycling (Packaging/Office/Facility/Retail)",
        "Waste & Recycling (Product/Textiles)",
        "Water Effluents & Treatment",
        "Water Usage & Footprint",
        "Working Hours & Rest Breaks",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+1.3 Management Procedures+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
        "Fashion Revolution+1.3 Management Procedures+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 11,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Management_Procedures+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Management_Procedures+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_effluents_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_usage_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_and_recycling_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Maternity_rights_and_parental_leave_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Energy_and_carbon_emissions_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Annual_leave_and_public_holidays_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Contracts_and_terms_of_employment_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Notice_period_and_dismissal_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Wages_and_financial_benefits_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Discrimination_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Diversity_and_inclusion_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Harassment_and_violence_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Health_and_safety_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Working_hours_and_rest_breaks_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Child_labour_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Foreign_and_migrant_labour_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Forced_and_bonded_labour_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Anti_corruption_and_bribery_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Management_Procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821758,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Describes Process to Identify Impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Process_to_Identify_Impacts.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Describes Process to Identify Impacts",
      "question": "Does the company describe the process for identifying its most material human rights and environmental impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "A materiality assessment discloses how the company identifies its most material human rights and environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses how it identifies its most material human rights and environmental impacts. Start by searching for public disclosures on the company's most material human rights and environmental impacts, typically a materiality matrix or a similar assessment. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Materiality Assessment<br>- Materiality Matrix<br>- Priority issues/challenges<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- The availability of the CSR/sustainability report by itself is not sufficient for any points under this question.<br>- A description of the process to identify material impacts is typically a materiality assessment, whereas publishing the results of that materiality assessment would be considered disclosing what the most material impacts are (next question).<br>- If found in the company's CSR/Sustainability report, it must be included in the current report even if the assessment was conducted in previous years.<br>- Reports published after January 18</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Describes Process to Identify Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Process_to_Identify_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Process_to_Identify_Impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821768,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Material Impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Material_Impacts.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Material Impacts",
      "question": "Does the company disclose what its most material or significant human rights and environmental impacts are?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "A materiality assessment discloses how the company identifies its most material human rights and environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses its most material human rights and environmental impacts. Start by searching for public disclosures on the company's most material human rights and environmental impacts, typically a materiality matrix or a similar assessment. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Materiality Assessment<br>- Materiality Matrix<br>- Priority issues/challenges<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- The availability of the CSR/sustainability report by itself is not sufficient for any points under this question.<br>- A description of the process to identify material impacts is typically a materiality assessment (previous question), whereas publishing the results of that materiality assessment would be considered disclosing what the most material impacts are.<br>- If found in the company's CSR/Sustainability report, it must be included in the current report even if the assessment was conducted in previous years.<br>- Reports published after January 18</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Material Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Material_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Material_Impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821778,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Plan for Improving Human Rights Impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Plan_for_Improving_Human_Rights_Impacts.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Plan for Improving Human Rights Impacts",
      "question": "Does the company publish measurable, time-bound and long-term commitments, targets or goals for improving their human rights impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "It is important for a brand to publish a strategic plan, targets or goals in order to drive improvements in their human rights and environmental impact. When brands publish their progress towards achieving human rights and environmental goals, it allows citizens to understand more about brands and how they can hold the brands to account to their goals.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes a strategic plan towards progressively improving their human rights impacts. Start by looking for a strategic plan published by the company, which could be a roadmap, vision, commitments, targets or goals. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Goals<br>- Targets<br>- Commitments<br>- Strategy<br>- Strategic plan<br>- Roadmap<br>- Vision<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Must cover dates in the future<br>- If the brand has a 5 year strategy and they are at the end of that 5 years and reporting on progress then that is still acceptable.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Plan for Improving Human Rights Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Plan_for_Improving_Human_Rights_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Plan_for_Improving_Human_Rights_Impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821788,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Plan for Improving Environmental Impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Plan_for_Improving_Environmental_Impacts.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Plan for Improving Environmental Impacts",
      "question": "Does the company publish measurable, time-bound and long-term commitments, targets or goals for improving their environmental impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "It is important for a brand to publish a strategic plan, targets or goals in order to drive improvements in their human rights and environmental impact. When brands publish their progress towards achieving human rights and environmental goals, it allows citizens to understand more about brands and how they can hold the brands to account to their goals.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes a strategic plan towards progressively improving their environmental impacts. Start by looking for a strategic plan published by the company, which could be a roadmap, vision, commitments, targets or goals. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Goals<br>- Targets<br>- Commitments<br>- Strategy<br>- Strategic plan<br>- Roadmap<br>- Vision<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Must cover dates in the future<br>- If the brand has a 5 year strategy and they are at the end of that 5 years and reporting on progress then that is still acceptable.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Plan for Improving Environmental Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Plan_for_Improving_Environmental_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Plan_for_Improving_Environmental_Impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821798,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Reports on Efforts to Improve Human Rights Impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reports_on_Efforts_to_Improve_Human_Rights_Impacts.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Reports on Efforts to Improve Human Rights Impacts",
      "question": "Does the company release annual, up-to-date disclosure of progress towards achieving its measurable, time-bound and long-term human rights commitments, targets or goals?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "It is important for a brand to publish a strategic plan, targets or goals in order to drive improvements in their human rights and environmental impact. When brands publish their progress towards achieving human rights and environmental goals, it allows citizens to understand more about brands and how they can hold the brands to account to their goals.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company releases annual, up-to-date disclosure of progress towards achieving its measurable, time-bound and long-term human rights commitments, targets or goals. Start by looking for a strategic plan published by the company, which could be a roadmap, vision, commitments, targets or goals, next look for evidence that they are reporting on their progress to achieving these goals.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Goals<br>- Targets<br>- Commitments<br>- Strategy<br>- Strategic plan<br>- Roadmap<br>- Vision<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Must cover dates in the future<br>- If the brand has a 5 year strategy and they are at the end of that 5 years and reporting on progress then that is still acceptable.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Reports on Efforts to Improve Human Rights Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reports_on_Efforts_to_Improve_Human_Rights_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reports_on_Efforts_to_Improve_Human_Rights_Impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821808,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Reports on Efforts to Improve Environmental Impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reports_on_Efforts_to_Improve_Environmental_Impacts.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Reports on Efforts to Improve Environmental Impacts",
      "question": "Does the company release annual, up-to-date disclosure of progress towards achieving its measurable, time-bound and long-term environmental commitments, targets or goals?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "It is important for a brand to publish a strategic plan, targets or goals in order to drive improvements in their human rights and environmental impact. When brands publish their progress towards achieving human rights and environmental goals, it allows citizens to understand more about brands and how they can hold the brands to account to their goals.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company releases annual, up-to-date disclosure of progress towards achieving its measurable, time-bound and long-term environmental commitments, targets or goals. Start by looking for a strategic plan published by the company, which could be a roadmap, vision, commitments, targets or goals, next look for evidence that they are reporting on their progress to achieving these goals.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Goals<br>- Targets<br>- Commitments<br>- Strategy<br>- Strategic plan<br>- Roadmap<br>- Vision<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Must cover dates in the future<br>- If the brand has a 5 year strategy and they are at the end of that 5 years and reporting on progress then that is still acceptable.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Reports on Efforts to Improve Environmental Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reports_on_Efforts_to_Improve_Environmental_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reports_on_Efforts_to_Improve_Environmental_Impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821818,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.5 Verified Sustainability Report",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_5_Verified_Sustainability_Report.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.5 Verified Sustainability Report",
      "question": "Does the company publish an annual sustainability or corporate social responsibility report that is audited or verified by an independent third party?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Verified sustainability reporting assures the quality and credibility of the information.
",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes an annual sustainability or corporate social responsibility report that is audited or verified by an independent third party. Start by looking for an annual sustainability or corporate social responsibility report (could also be found within annual company report) that is audited or verified by an independent third party (e.g. as required by French law)<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Audit<br>- Verified<br>- Independent<br>- Third party<br>- Sustainability report<br>- CSR report<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Reports published after January 18<br>- Must state clearly that the sustainability information is audited and not just the financial data within the report, or if unclear then we cannot count</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+1.5 Verified Sustainability Report+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_5_Verified_Sustainability_Report+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_5_Verified_Sustainability_Report+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821828,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2.1 Identifies Lead Responsibility for Human Rights & Environmental Issues",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Identifies_Lead_Responsibility_for_Human_Rights_Environmental_Issues.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2.1 Identifies Lead Responsibility for Human Rights & Environmental Issues",
      "question": "Does the company publicly disclose who in the company has the lead responsibility for human rights and environmental issues?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "When brands publish contact details for their sustainability team this demonstrates that they are open to dialogue between the brand and its customers and stakeholders.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses who has the lead responsibility for human rights and environmental issues. Start by looking for direct contact details for the relevant department or individual with lead responsibility. This can be an email address, phone number or address. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Contact page<br>- Company Code of Conduct<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Sustainability team/department<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility team<br>- Head of Sustainability<br>- Sustainability Director<br>- @ <br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- It can often be found at the bottom of documents <br><br><strong>For example:</strong><br>- If the contact details of the relevant department are provided, this could be the email address and/or phone number of sustainability or CSR team<br>- If the contact details of the relevant person are provided, this could be their email address or phone number. Do make sure this is the lead responsibility for human rights and environmental impacts in the business</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Discloses direct contact details for relevant department",
        "Discloses name and direct contact details of the relevant person",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+2.1 Identifies Lead Responsibility for Human Rights & Environmental Issues+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
        "Fashion Revolution+2.1 Identifies Lead Responsibility for Human Rights & Environmental Issues+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Identifies_Lead_Responsibility_for_Human_Rights_Environmental_Issues+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Identifies_Lead_Responsibility_for_Human_Rights_Environmental_Issues+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Identifies_Lead_Responsibility_for_Human_Rights_Environmental_Issues+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821838,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Accountable Board Member Identified",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Accountable_Board_Member_Identified.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Accountable Board Member Identified",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the name of the board member responsible for human rights and environmental issues in the business?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "When a brand discloses the board member responsible for overseeing social and environmental performance within the company it provides an indication of the significance placed on addressing these issues within the company.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses which board member or board committee is accountable for human rights and environmental issues. Start by looking for the name of the board member or board committee who is responsible for social and environmental issues. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Investor relations documents<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Contact page<br>- Company Code of Conduct<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Governance<br>- Board member<br>- Board committee<br>- Board of Directors<br>- Chair of Committee<br>- Committee<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- This must be a specific board member, an individual person, such as the chair of the relevant committee.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Accountable Board Member Identified+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Accountable_Board_Member_Identified+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Accountable_Board_Member_Identified+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821848,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Implementation of Board Level Accountability Described",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Implementation_of_Board_Level_Accountability_Described.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Implementation of Board Level Accountability Described",
      "question": "Does the company publish a description of how board level accountability is implemented in practice?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "When a brand discloses how board level accountability is implemented within the company it provides an indication of the significance placed on addressing these issues within the company.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses how board level oversight on issues like human rights and the environment is implemented in practice. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Investor relations documents<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Contact page<br>- Company Code of Conduct<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Governance<br>- Board member<br>- Board committee<br>- Board of Directors<br>- Chair of Committee<br>- Committee</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Implementation of Board Level Accountability Described+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Implementation_of_Board_Level_Accountability_Described+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Implementation_of_Board_Level_Accountability_Described+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821858,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Employee Incentives to Improve Impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Employee_Incentives_to_Improve_Impacts.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Employee Incentives to Improve Impacts",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how employees beyond the CSR / sustainability / ethical trade team incentives are tied to improvements in human rights impacts and environmental management?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Incentivising staff beyond the CSR/Sustainability team such as sourcing, production, buying and design to contribute towards improving social and environmental impacts ensures there is accountability for those within the company whose decision making has an influence. While incentivising suppliers to improve social and environmental performance can be accomplished through guaranteeing longer contracts, increased order size, price premiums and fewer audits can motivate suppliers to improve and drive changes in their own operations and throughout their supply chain.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes how it incorporates human rights and environmental performance into purchasing practices. Start by looking for a disclosure of how employees beyond the CSR team are incentivised to improve human rights impacts and environmental management. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Incentives<br>- Performance reviews<br>- Bonuses<br>- Purchasing practices<br>- Remuneration<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for: </strong><br>- We are looking for disclosure of how these incentives are implemented, it is not enough to say that they are in place<br>- With \"employees beyond the CSR/sustainability/ethical trade team\" we mean e.g. employees from sourcing, production, buying, design, etc departments<br>- With employee \"incentives\" we mean e.g. pay, bonuses, part of employee performance reviews, etc.<br>- Training is not sufficient</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Employee Incentives to Improve Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Employee_Incentives_to_Improve_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Employee_Incentives_to_Improve_Impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821868,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Executive Incentives to Improve Impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Executive_Incentives_to_Improve_Impacts.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Executive Incentives to Improve Impacts",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how executive incentives are tied to improvements in human rights impacts and environmental management?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Incentivising staff beyond the CSR/Sustainability team such as sourcing, production, buying and design to contribute towards improving social and environmental impacts ensures there is accountability for those within the company whose decision making has an influence. While incentivising suppliers to improve social and environmental performance can be accomplished through guaranteeing longer contracts, increased order size, price premiums and fewer audits can motivate suppliers to improve and drive changes in their own operations and throughout their supply chain.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes how it incorporates human rights and environmental performance into purchasing practices. Start by looking for a disclosure of how executives are incentivised to improve human rights impacts and environmental management. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Incentives<br>- Performance reviews<br>- Bonuses<br>- Purchasing practices<br>- Remuneration<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for: </strong><br>- We are looking for disclosure of how these incentives are implemented, it is not enough to say that they are in place<br>- With \"executive\" we mean e.g. CEO, CFO, president<br>- With executive \"incentives\" we mean e.g. pay, bonuses, part of employee performance reviews, etc.<br>- Training is not sufficient</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Executive Incentives to Improve Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Executive_Incentives_to_Improve_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Executive_Incentives_to_Improve_Impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821878,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Supplier Incentives to Improve Impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supplier_Incentives_to_Improve_Impacts.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Supplier Incentives to Improve Impacts",
      "question": "Does the company describe how suppliers incentives are tied to improvement in good labour practices and environmental management?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Incentivising staff beyond the CSR/Sustainability team such as sourcing, production, buying and design to contribute towards improving social and environmental impacts ensures there is accountability for those within the company whose decision making has an influence. While incentivising suppliers to improve social and environmental performance can be accomplished through guaranteeing longer contracts, increased order size, price premiums and fewer audits can motivate suppliers to improve and drive changes in their own operations and throughout their supply chain.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes how it incorporates human rights and environmental performance into purchasing practices. Start by looking for a disclosure of how suppliers are incentivised to improve human rights impacts and environmental management. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Long-term supplier relation<br>- Purchasing practices<br>- Price premium<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for: </strong><br>- We are looking for disclosure of how these incentives are implemented, it is not enough to say that they are in place<br>- With supplier \"incentives\" we mean e.g. long-term commitments to purchase, longer contracts, increased orders, price premiums, fewer audits<br>- Training is not sufficient</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Supplier Incentives to Improve Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supplier_Incentives_to_Improve_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supplier_Incentives_to_Improve_Impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821888,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3.1 Tier One Factory Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_1_Tier_One_Factory_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3.1 Tier One Factory Disclosure",
      "question": "What information does the company publish about its factories that is has a direct relationship with? (e.g production units, Cut Make and Trim (CMT) facilities, garment finishing, full package production and packaging and storage)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Disclosing first tier supplier lists is a crucial step towards transparency for major fashion brands. It can help facilitate the identification and escalation of labour rights and environmental issues by trade unions, NGOs and other stakeholders directly to brands enabling them to take urgent actions to address and remediate issues raised.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify what information the company publishes about its tier one factories. Start by looking for a list of the company's first tier suppliers (direct relationship with buyer e.g. production units, Cut Make Trim (CMT) facilities, garment sewing, garment finishing, full package production and packaging and storage).<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Tier one<br>- First tier<br>- Supplier/Vendor/Factory list<br>- Factory locations<br>- Factory map<br>- Manufacturing<br>- Cut, Make and Trim/Sew <br>- Open Apparel Registry (OAR)<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- We are looking for a map or list that represents a significant proportion of their suppliers<br>- If a brand links to OAR and you can find suppliers linked to the brand on the platform, then we will allow points.<br>- Where brands says their list includes \"all\" their suppliers, we assume this means 100% and we give them the point<br>- If brand says list updated every X months accepted <br>- Online maps and PDF documents do not count as not machine readable. Looking specifically for Excel or csv documents. Publishing the information in csv or excel formats makes this information easy to use for third parties like trade unions and NGOs (for more information, see: https://odsas.org/)<br>- Worker-management committees are not sufficient. Committees must be independent, otherwise workers power is potentially quite limited.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Name of Facility",
        "Address",
        "Type of products or services",
        "Approximate number of workers at each site",
        "Sex-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site",
        "If facility has trade union",
        "If the facility has an independent worker committee",
        "% or number of migrant or contract workers",
        "Certifications the facility has (if any) (2021 only)",
        "Name of Parent Company (for each facility if applicable)",
        "List is publicly available as a csv or Excel spreadsheet",
        "Discloses what percentage of its tier one factories is published",
        "Discloses 95% or higher of tier one factories are included in the list/map",
        "Publishes that this list or map of tier one factories has been updated within the past 6 months",
        "Race-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site (FTI Brazil only)",
        "Supplier list contributed to the Open Apparel Registry (assessed from 2022)",
        "Discloses aggregate business volume and percentage of suppliers (assessed from 2022)",
        "Weekly take-home wage (assessed from 2023)",
        "Length of time worked with facility (assessed from 2023)",
        "Nothing"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+3.1 Tier One Factory Disclosure+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
        "Fashion Revolution+3.1 Tier One Factory Disclosure+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
        "Fashion Revolution+3.1 Tier One Factory Disclosure+Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021 - Scoring",
        "Fashion Revolution+3.1 Tier One Factory Disclosure+Fashion Transparency Index 2022 - Scoring",
        "Fashion Revolution+3.1 Tier One Factory Disclosure+Fashion Transparency Index 2023 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1094,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 9,
      "companies": 347,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_1_Tier_One_Factory_Disclosure+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_1_Tier_One_Factory_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_1_Tier_One_Factory_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021_Scoring.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_1_Tier_One_Factory_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2022_Scoring.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_1_Tier_One_Factory_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2023_Scoring.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Open_Format_for_Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Combined.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supplier_Disclosure_combined.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Transparency_Beyond_Basic_Pledge_Standard_Combined.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Wage_Data_Disclosure.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_1_Tier_One_Factory_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821898,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3.2 Processing Facilities Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_2_Processing_Facilities_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3.2 Processing Facilities Disclosure",
      "question": "What information does the company publish about its processing facilities? (e.g. ginning and spinning, knitting, weaving, sub-contractors, dyeing and wet processing, tanneries, embroidering, printing, fabric finishing, dye-houses, laundries, etc.)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Disclosing a list of suppliers beyond the first tier shows that a brand is working to map deeper levels of their supply chain and takes some responsibility for its direct and indirect sourcing relationships. It can help facilitate the identification and escalation of labour rights and environmental issues by trade unions, NGOs and other stakeholders directly to brands enabling them to take urgent actions to address and remediate issues raised. This is especially important beyond the first tier where brands may not be able to monitor their suppliers as easily.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify what information the company publishes about its processing facilities. Start by looking for a list of processing facilities (e.g. ginning and spinning, knitting, weaving, sub-contractors, dyeing and wet processing, tanneries, embroidering, printing, fabric finishing, dye-houses, laundries, etc.).<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Processing factories/facilities<br>- Tier 2<br>- Wet processing<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Where brands says their list includes \"all\" their suppliers, we assume this means 100% and we give them the point<br>- If brand says list updated every X months accepted <br>- We are looking for a map or list that represents a significant proportion of their suppliers. Disclosing one or two suppliers is not sufficient unless it specifies that these suppliers supply a significant chunk of the company's overall product volume.<br>- Worker-management committees are not sufficient. Committees must be independent, otherwise workers power is potentially quite limited.<br>- Online maps and PDF documents do not count as not machine readable. Looking specifically for Excel or csv documents.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Name of Facility",
        "Address",
        "Type of products or services",
        "Approximate number of workers at each site",
        "Sex-disaggregated breakdown of workers",
        "If facility has trade union",
        "If the facility has an independent worker committee",
        "% or number of migrant or contract workers",
        "Certifications the facility has (if any) (2021 only)",
        "Name of Parent Company (for each facility if applicable)",
        "Discloses which tier one facility (or facilities) this processing facility works with",
        "List is publicly available as a csv or Excel spreadsheet",
        "Discloses what percentage of processing facilities is published",
        "Discloses 95% or higher of processing facilities are included in the list/map",
        "Publishes that this list or map of processing facilities has been updated within the past 6 months",
        "Race-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site (FTI Brazil only)",
        "Supplier list contributed to the Open Apparel Registry (assessed from 2022)",
        "Discloses aggregate business volume and percentage of suppliers (assessed from 2022)",
        "Nothing"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+3.2 Processing Facilities Disclosure+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
        "Fashion Revolution+3.2 Processing Facilities Disclosure+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
        "Fashion Revolution+3.2 Processing Facilities Disclosure+Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021 - Scoring",
        "Fashion Revolution+3.2 Processing Facilities Disclosure+Fashion Transparency Index 2022 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_2_Processing_Facilities_Disclosure+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_2_Processing_Facilities_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_2_Processing_Facilities_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021_Scoring.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_2_Processing_Facilities_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2022_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_2_Processing_Facilities_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821908,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3.3 Raw Materials Suppliers Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_3_Raw_Materials_Suppliers_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3.3 Raw Materials Suppliers Disclosure",
      "question": "What information does the company publish about its suppliers of raw materials? (e.g. raw material providers, farms, slaughter houses, sewing yarn suppliers, filament and staple, chemical suppliers, etc.)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Disclosing raw material suppliers shows that a brand is working to trace its whole supply chain and takes some responsibility for its direct and indirect sourcing relationships. It can help facilitate the identification and escalation of labour rights and environmental issues by trade unions, NGOs and other stakeholders directly to brands enabling them to take urgent actions to address and remediate issues raised. This is especially important beyond the first tier where brands may not be able to monitor their suppliers as easily.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify what information the company publishes about its suppliers of raw materials. Start by looking for a list of raw material suppliers (e.g. raw material providers, farms, slaughter houses, sewing yarn suppliers, filament and staple, chemical suppliers, etc.) <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Raw materials<br>- Supplier list<br>- Sourcing<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- May only be publishing for one type of raw material. e.g. cotton or wool.<br>- Where brands says their list includes \"all\" their suppliers, we assume this means 100% and we give them the point<br>- If brand says list updated every X months accepted <br>- We are looking for a map or list that represents a significant proportion of their suppliers. Disclosing one or two suppliers is not sufficient unless it specifies that these suppliers supply a significant chunk of the company's overall product volume. However, will accept if list covers only one or two types of fibre such as viscose, wool, cotton, etc.<br>- Online maps and PDF documents do not count as not machine readable. Looking specifically for Excel or csv documents.<br>- Efforts to trace raw materials might include taking part in Leather Working Group or using Responsible Down/Wool Standard, Global Recycling Standard, Content Claim Standard, Organic Cotton Standard, GOTS, FAIRTRADE Certified Cotton Mark and Cotton Programme, Cotton Made in Africa HIP, Oeko-Tex SteP/Made in Green or company/parent group's own initiatives such as using blockchain or transaction certifications or DNA schemes.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Name of supplier (e.g. parent company) (2021 only)",
        "Name of Supplier (e.g. facility or farm)",
        "Address",
        "Type of raw material products or services",
        "Approximate number of workers",
        "Sex-disaggregated breakdown of workers",
        "% or number of migrant or contract workers",
        "List is publicly available as a csv or Excel spreadsheet",
        "Discloses what percentage of raw materials suppliers is published",
        "Discloses supplier list that covers more than one raw material type (2021 only)",
        "Discloses 95% or higher of raw materials suppliers are included in the list/map",
        "Publishes that this list or map of raw materials suppliers has been updated within the past 12 months",
        "Discloses whether the company is tracing the source/supplier of one or more specific raw materials",
        "Race-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site (FTI Brazil only)",
        "Nothing"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+3.3 Raw Materials Suppliers Disclosure+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
        "Fashion Revolution+3.3 Raw Materials Suppliers Disclosure+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
        "Fashion Revolution+3.3 Raw Materials Suppliers Disclosure+Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_3_Raw_Materials_Suppliers_Disclosure+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_3_Raw_Materials_Suppliers_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_3_Raw_Materials_Suppliers_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_3_Raw_Materials_Suppliers_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821918,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Describes Due Diligence Process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Due_Diligence_Process.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Describes Due Diligence Process",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how it works to identify human rights and environmental risks, impacts and violations in its supply chain (its approach to conducting due diligence)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses human rights and environmental due diligence processes.<br><br>Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse impacts. Due diligence can be included within broader enterprise risk management systems, provided that it goes beyond simply identifying and managing material risks to the enterprise itself to include issues occurring within their supply chain and focuses on identifying the most salient risks to workers, farmers and other affected stakeholders themselves.<br><br>Start by taking a look at a brand's Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure, due diligence processes and results are often there but can also be described in annual reports. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Due Diligence<br>- Risk <br>- Risk Assessment<br>- Analysis<br>- UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>- OECD<br>- Priorities<br>- Identifying salient Human Rights or Environmental issues<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Will allow points in this subsection for data covering human rights or environmental topics but best practice is covering both.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Describes Due Diligence Process+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 573,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Due_Diligence_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Due_Diligence_Process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821928,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Stakeholder Engagement in Due Diligence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Due_Diligence.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Stakeholder Engagement in Due Diligence",
      "question": "Does the company disclose that worker/producer/farmer representatives, unions and other affected stakeholders are involved in the due diligence process and explain how they are involved?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses whether worker/producer/farmer representatives, unions and other affected stakeholders are involved in the due diligence process.<br><br>Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse impacts. Due diligence can be included within broader enterprise risk management systems, provided that it goes beyond simply identifying and managing material risks to the enterprise itself to include issues occurring within their supply chain and focuses on identifying the most salient risks to workers, farmers and other affected stakeholders themselves.<br><br>Start by taking a look at a brand's Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure, due diligence processes and results are often there but can also be described in annual reports. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Due Diligence<br>- Risk <br>- Risk Assessment<br>- Analysis<br>- UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>- OECD<br>- Priorities<br>- Identifying salient Human Rights or Environmental issues</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Stakeholder Engagement in Due Diligence+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 573,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Due_Diligence+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Due_Diligence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821938,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Risks Impacts and Violations Identified",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Risks_Impacts_and_Violations_Identified.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Risks Impacts and Violations Identified",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the human rights and environmental risks, impacts and violations identified and their prioritisation (low, medium, high)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses the risks/impacts identified and their prioritisation (low, medium, high).<br><br>Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse impacts. Due diligence can be included within broader enterprise risk management systems, provided that it goes beyond simply identifying and managing material risks to the enterprise itself to include issues occurring within their supply chain and focuses on identifying the most salient risks to workers, farmers and other affected stakeholders themselves.<br><br>Start by taking a look at a brand's Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure, due diligence processes and results are often there but can also be described in annual reports. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Due Diligence<br>- Risk <br>- Risk Assessment<br>- Analysis<br>- UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>- OECD<br>- Priorities<br>- Identifying salient Human Rights or Environmental issues<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- A materiality matrix may be partially based on a company's due diligence process but they do not get points in this section purely for publishing a materiality matrix. <br>- Will allow points in this subsection for data covering human rights or environmental topics but best practice is covering both.<br>- We are looking for geographic hotspots and thematic risks and impacts to be identified.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Risks Impacts and Violations Identified+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 573,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Risks_Impacts_and_Violations_Identified+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Risks_Impacts_and_Violations_Identified+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821948,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Prevention Mitigation and Remediation of Risks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Prevention_Mitigation_and_Remediation_of_Risks.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Prevention Mitigation and Remediation of Risks",
      "question": "Does the company disclose evidence of steps taken to cease, prevent, mitigate and remedy human rights and environmental risks, impacts and violations identified?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses steps taken to cease, prevent, mitigate and remedy violations identified.<br><br>Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse impacts. Due diligence can be included within broader enterprise risk management systems, provided that it goes beyond simply identifying and managing material risks to the enterprise itself to include issues occurring within the supply chain and focuses on identifying the most salient risks to workers, farmers and other affected stakeholders.<br><br>Start by taking a look at a brand's Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure, due diligence processes and results are often there but can also be described in annual reports. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Due Diligence<br>- Risk <br>- Risk Assessment<br>- Analysis<br>- UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>- OECD<br>- Priorities<br>- Identifying salient Human Rights or Environmental issues<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Will allow points in this sub-section for data covering human rights or environmental topics but best practice is covering both.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Prevention Mitigation and Remediation of Risks+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 573,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Prevention_Mitigation_and_Remediation_of_Risks+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Prevention_Mitigation_and_Remediation_of_Risks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821958,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Risk Prevention and Remediation Outcomes Published",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Risk_Prevention_and_Remediation_Outcomes_Published.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Risk Prevention and Remediation Outcomes Published",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the outcomes or results of steps taken to cease, prevent, mitigate and remedy human rights and environmental risks, impacts and violations identified?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses the outcomes of steps taken to remedy risks.<br><br>Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse impacts. Due diligence can be included within broader enterprise risk management systems, provided that it goes beyond simply identifying and managing material risks to the enterprise itself to include issues occurring within their supply chain and focuses on identifying the most salient risks to workers, farmers and other affected stakeholders themselves.<br><br>Start by taking a look at a brand's Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure, due diligence processes and results are often there but can also be described in annual reports. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Due Diligence<br>- Risk <br>- Risk Assessment<br>- Analysis<br>- UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>- OECD<br>- Priorities<br>- Identifying salient Human Rights or Environmental issues<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Will allow points in this sub-section for data covering human rights or environmental topics but best practice is covering both.<br>- Will accept outcomes or results of steps taken even if the results cover just one topic or one intervention made.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Risk Prevention and Remediation Outcomes Published+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 573,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Risk_Prevention_and_Remediation_Outcomes_Published+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Risk_Prevention_and_Remediation_Outcomes_Published+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821968,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Facility Level Assessment Description",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Facility_Level_Assessment_Description.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Facility Level Assessment Description",
      "question": "Does the company publish a description of the facility-level assessment process?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes a description of the facility-level assessment process. Start by looking for a description of if and how the company conducts supply chain audits or other forms of supplier assessment. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company websites<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Audit<br>- Factory visit/Assessment<br>- Supplier Compliance<br>- Social Compliance<br>- Assessment<br>- Monitoring<br>- Measurement or Performance Standards<br>- Off-site interview<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- This question is looking for them to describe their procedure determining whether their suppliers are meeting their ethical and sustainability standards (as usually set out of the Code of Conduct or similar document).<br>- Good place to look for section 4 questions might be a company's Modern Slavery Statement or if they publish their Know The Chain response as well as their annual report.<br>- Facility-level assessment processes are typically audits</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Facility Level Assessment Description+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 573,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Facility_Level_Assessment_Description+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Facility_Level_Assessment_Description+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821978,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Third-party Audit Standards Disclosed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Third_party_Audit_Standards_Disclosed.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Third-party Audit Standards Disclosed",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the external/third-party supplier audit standard(s) used?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses the external/third-party audit standard(s) they use. Start by looking for a description of if and how the company conducts supply chain audits or other forms of supplier assessment. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company websites<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Audit<br>- Factory visit/Assessment<br>- Supplier Compliance<br>- Social Compliance<br>- Assessment<br>- Monitoring<br>- Measurement or Performance Standards<br>- Off-site interview<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Good place to look for section 4 questions might be a company's Modern Slavery Statement or if they publish their Know The Chain response as well as their annual report.<br>- Facility-level assessment processes are typically audits<br>- We are specifically looking for the external or third-party standards that their supply chain partners will be assessed against or the tools that they use to conduct audits e.g. BSCI, Smeta, SAI/SAAS, WRAP, FLA, SLCP, Higg Index facility module.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Third-party Audit Standards Disclosed+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Third_party_Audit_Standards_Disclosed+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Third_party_Audit_Standards_Disclosed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821988,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+New Production Facility Criteria",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+New_Production_Facility_Criteria.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "New Production Facility Criteria",
      "question": "Does the company disclose criteria for taking on new facilities before production commences to ensure the facility meets its policies and standards?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses their criteria for taking on new facilities before production commences to ensure the facility meets policies and standards. Start by looking for a description of if and how the company conducts supply chain audits or other forms of supplier assessment. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company websites<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Audit<br>- Factory visit/Assessment<br>- Supplier Compliance<br>- Social Compliance<br>- Assessment<br>- Monitoring<br>- Measurement or Performance Standards<br>- Off-site interview<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- There may be a requirement that the facility passes an audit before manufacturing commences or at a certain stage of commencing production/completing a first order.<br>- Good place to look for section 4 questions might be a company's Modern Slavery Statement or if they publish their Know The Chain response as well as their annual report.<br>- Facility-level assessment processes are typically audits<br>- Examples of criteria in place for new facilities to assure compliance with policies include self-assessments or audit requirements</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+New Production Facility Criteria+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+New_Production_Facility_Criteria+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+New_Production_Facility_Criteria+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5821998,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Assessment Frequency Disclosed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Assessment_Frequency_Disclosed.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Assessment Frequency Disclosed",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its policy on the frequency of supplier assessments?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses their policy on the frequency of assessments. Start by looking for a description of if and how the company conducts supply chain audits or other forms of supplier assessment. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company websites<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Audit<br>- Factory visit/Assessment<br>- Supplier Compliance<br>- Social Compliance<br>- Assessment<br>- Monitoring<br>- Measurement or Performance Standards<br>- Off-site interview<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Good place to look for section 4 questions might be a company's Modern Slavery Statement or if they publish their Know The Chain response as well as their annual report.<br>- Facility-level assessment processes are typically audits<br>- A company statement saying they “regularly” do assessments is not sufficient, rather we are looking for more specific disclosure, for example saying \"annually\" or \"biannually\"</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Assessment Frequency Disclosed+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Assessment_Frequency_Disclosed+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Assessment_Frequency_Disclosed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822008,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Percentage of Facility Assessments Disclosed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Facility_Assessments_Disclosed.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Percentage of Facility Assessments Disclosed",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the percentage (%) of supplier assessments that are announced, semi-announced or unannounced?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses the percentage (%) of facility assessments that are announced, semi-announced or unannounced. Start by looking for a description of if and how the company conducts supply chain audits or other forms of supplier assessment. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company websites<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Audit<br>- Factory visit/Assessment<br>- Supplier Compliance<br>- Social Compliance<br>- Assessment<br>- Monitoring<br>- Measurement or Performance Standards<br>- Off-site interview<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Good place to look for section 4 questions might be a company's Modern Slavery Statement or if they publish their Know The Chain response as well as their annual report.<br>- Facility-level assessment processes are typically audits</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Percentage of Facility Assessments Disclosed+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 573,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Facility_Assessments_Disclosed+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Facility_Assessments_Disclosed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822018,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Facility Assessments Beyond Tier 1",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Facility_Assessments_Beyond_Tier_1.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Facility Assessments Beyond Tier 1",
      "question": "Does the company disclose that the scope of supplier assessments goes beyond first tier facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses that the scope of facility assessments goes beyond tier 1 facilities. Start by looking for a description of if and how the company conducts supply chain audits or other forms of supplier assessment. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company websites<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Audit<br>- Factory visit/Assessment<br>- Supplier Compliance<br>- Social Compliance<br>- Assessment<br>- Monitoring<br>- Measurement or Performance Standards<br>- Off-site interview<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Good place to look for section 4 questions might be a company's Modern Slavery Statement or if they publish their Know The Chain response as well as their annual report.<br>- Facility-level assessment processes are typically audits<br>- \"Beyond tier 1 facilities\" would be tier 2/3/4 etc, by which we mean processing facilities, textile mills, laundries and dye houses, suppliers of raw materials, farms, tanneries</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Facility Assessments Beyond Tier 1+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Facility_Assessments_Beyond_Tier_1+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Facility_Assessments_Beyond_Tier_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822028,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Off-site Worker Interviews",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Off_site_Worker_Interviews.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Off-site Worker Interviews",
      "question": "Does the company disclose that supplier assessments include offsite worker interviews?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses that supplier assessments include off site worker interviews. Start by looking for a description of if and how the company conducts supply chain audits or other forms of supplier assessment. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company websites<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Audit<br>- Factory visit/Assessment<br>- Supplier Compliance<br>- Social Compliance<br>- Assessment<br>- Monitoring<br>- Measurement or Performance Standards<br>- Off-site interview<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Good place to look for section 4 questions might be a company's Modern Slavery Statement or if they publish their Know The Chain response as well as their annual report.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Off-site Worker Interviews+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Off_site_Worker_Interviews+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Off_site_Worker_Interviews+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822038,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Number or % of off-site worker interviews",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Number_or_of_off_site_worker_interviews.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Number or % of off-site worker interviews",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the number or percentage (%) of workers interviewed offsite as part of supplier assessments?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses the number or percentage (%) of workers interviewed offsite as part of supplier assessments. Start by looking for a description of if and how the company conducts supply chain audits or other forms of supplier assessment. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company websites<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Audit<br>- Factory visit/Assessment<br>- Supplier Compliance<br>- Social Compliance<br>- Assessment<br>- Monitoring<br>- Measurement or Performance Standards<br>- Off-site interview<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Good place to look for section 4 questions might be a company's Modern Slavery Statement or if they publish their Know The Chain response as well as their annual report.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Number or % of off-site worker interviews+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Number_or_of_off_site_worker_interviews+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Number_or_of_off_site_worker_interviews+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822048,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Summary of Assessment Findings",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Summary_of_Assessment_Findings.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Summary of Assessment Findings",
      "question": "For which facility-level(s) does the company publish a summary of assessment findings or aggregate rating without naming individual facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Publishing audit results can drive improvements in supplier compliance and provide stakeholders with useful information that can enable labour and environmental issues to be resolved quickly and collaboratively.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify for which facility-level (tier 1 level, beyond tier 1 e.g. processing facilities, and at raw material level) the company publishes a summary of assessment findings or aggregate rating without naming individual facilities. Start by looking at whether the company publishes a summary of assessment findings or aggregate facility rating without naming individual facilities. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Audit<br>- Supplier Compliance<br>- Social Compliance<br>- Assessment<br>- Monitoring<br>- Measurement or Performance Standards<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Summary of assessment findings are often statements such as: 90% of our factories audited received a C or above<br>- This can also be a table/text with number or percent of factories per audit grade e.g. 45 facilities received a gold rating, 25 facilities receive a silver rating...</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "At tier 1 level",
        "Beyond tier 1",
        "Raw material level",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Summary of Assessment Findings+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Summary_of_Assessment_Findings+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Summary_of_Assessment_Findings+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822058,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Ratings by Named Facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Ratings_by_Named_Facilities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Ratings by Named Facilities",
      "question": "For which facility-level(s) does the company publish ratings by named facility?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Publishing facility-level ratings for named suppliers provides tangible evidence of a supplier’s compliance level and can help drive improvements in supplier compliance over time. It also provides stakeholders with useful information that can enable labour and environmental issues to be resolved quickly and collaboratively.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify for which facility-level(s) the company publishes ratings by named facility. Start by looking at whether the company publishes a summary of assessment findings or aggregate facility-level rating by named facility (e.g. at factories, processing facilities, and farms). They may also include this information as part of a supplier/factory list.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Supplier/Factory list<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Audit<br>- Supplier Compliance<br>- Social Compliance<br>- Assessment<br>- Monitoring<br>- Measurement or Performance Standards<br>- Factory/Supplier list<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for: </strong><br>- Each factory will be graded or rated e.g. A - F, 1 to 5 Star factories, Gold, Silver, Bronze rated factories.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "At tier 1 level",
        "Beyond tier 1",
        "Raw material level",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Ratings by Named Facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Ratings_by_Named_Facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Ratings_by_Named_Facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822068,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Selected Audit Findings by Named Facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Selected_Audit_Findings_by_Named_Facilities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Selected Audit Findings by Named Facilities",
      "question": "For which facility-level(s) does the company publish selected audit findings by named facility?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Publishing audit results for specific named facilities shows a clear commitment to transparency from brands and can drive improvements in supplier compliance. It also provides stakeholders with useful information that can enable labour and environmental issues to be resolved quickly and collaboratively.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify for which facility-level(s) the company publishes selected audit findings. Start by looking at whether the company discloses selected audit findings (e.g. at factories, processing facilities, and farms) or look for evidence of work with ILO Better Work or Bangladesh Accord.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Audit<br>- Supplier Compliance<br>- Social Compliance<br>- Assessment<br>- Monitoring<br>- Measurement or Performance Standards<br>- Bangladesh Accord<br>- Transition Accord<br>- ILO Better Work<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- Where brands are publishing tier one supplier list in Section 3 and are members of the Bangladesh/Transition Accord or part of the ILO Better Work programme, and the Accord/Better Work is linked to from the brand's own website, then they should receive these points. This is because you could technically cross-reference their list with the Accord inspection reports or BW compliance reports for specific factories. <br>- There must be a link to Bangladesh Accord or Better Work from the brand's website<br>- ILO Better Work only applies to Tier 1 level<br>- Bangladesh Accord applies to Tier 1 level and Beyond Tier 1 level <br>- Bangladesh Alliance no longer counts as it has ceased operations.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "At tier 1 level",
        "Beyond tier 1",
        "Raw material level",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Selected Audit Findings by Named Facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Selected_Audit_Findings_by_Named_Facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Selected_Audit_Findings_by_Named_Facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822078,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Full Audit Reports by Named Facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Full_Audit_Reports_by_Named_Facilities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Full Audit Reports by Named Facilities",
      "question": "For which facility-level(s) does the company publish full audit reports naming individual facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Publishing full audit results for specific named facilities shows a clear commitment to transparency from brands and can drive improvements in supplier compliance. It also provides stakeholders with useful information that can enable labour and environmental issues to be resolved quickly and collaboratively. It also allows stakeholders to report inaccuracies or discrepancies between the audit findings and workers' actual experience in the workplace or other evidence.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify for which facility-level(s) the company publishes full audit reports naming individual facilities. Start by looking at whether the company discloses full audit reports naming individual facilities (e.g. at factories, processing facilities, and farms). <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Audit<br>- Supplier Compliance<br>- Social Compliance<br>- Assessment<br>- Monitoring<br>- Measurement or Performance Standards<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for:</strong><br>- We have yet to see a brand disclosing this so please contact a member of the team should you come across a brand disclosing at this level.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "At tier 1 level",
        "Beyond tier 1",
        "Raw material level",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Full Audit Reports by Named Facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Full_Audit_Reports_by_Named_Facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Full_Audit_Reports_by_Named_Facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822088,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Remediation Process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Remediation_Process.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Remediation Process",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the process for remediation when non-compliances are found in a facility?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Disclosing a company’s processes for remediation implies that the company is taking action to remedy human rights and environmental issues happening within their supply chain.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses the process for remediation when non-compliances are found in a facility. In other words, what do companies expect suppliers to do to fix problems found during audits, and are they committed to supporting the process. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Non compliance<br>- Remediation<br>- Corrective action plans (CAPs)<br>- Warning letters<br>- Stop work notices<br>- Supplementary training<br>- Zero-tolerance<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind: </strong><br>- For example, remediation processes might be corrective action plans that include stop-work notices, warning letters, supplementary training, and/or policy revision</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Remediation Process+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Remediation_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Remediation_Process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822098,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Affected Stakeholder Engagement in Remediation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Affected_Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Remediation.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Affected Stakeholder Engagement in Remediation",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how they engage with workers/producers/farmers, trade unions and any other affected stakeholders in the development and implementation of remediation/corrective action plans?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Including affected stakeholders, such as workers, farmers and trade unions, in the remediation process demonstrates that companies are seeking to design outcomes that will benefit the people it is intended to.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses how they engage with workers/producers/farmers, trade unions and any other affected stakeholders in the development and implementation of remediation/corrective action plans. Start by looking for information about what brands expect suppliers to do to fix problems found during audits and then look whether they detail whether stakeholders are involved.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Non-compliance<br>- Remediation<br>- Corrective action plans (CAPs)<br>- Stakeholders e.g. workers, producers, farmers and trade unions<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- We are looking for evidence that stakeholders have been consulted in the creation of the remediation plan and implementation process</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Affected Stakeholder Engagement in Remediation+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Affected_Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Remediation+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Affected_Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Remediation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822108,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Exit Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Exit_Strategy.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Exit Strategy",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its exit strategy for terminating relationships with suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "We are looking to see if the company has a responsible exit strategy in place when ending supplier relationships rather than cutting and running. We are looking to see if a company explains how they address and manage potential adverse impacts and risks to supply chain workers during the process.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses their exit strategy for when they end a relationship with a supplier. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Non-compliance<br>- Remediation<br>- Corrective action plans (CAPs)<br>- Exit strategy<br>- Responsible exit strategy<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- We are looking to see if the company has a policy that is beyond cutting-and-running when ending relationships with suppliers. We are looking to see if they disclose how they work to manage the possible adverse impacts and risks to workers during the process.<br>- It is not sufficient to say they have an exit plan in place if they do not disclose the exit plan itself<br>- we will only allow point for exit plans disclosed that describe a process beyond cutting and running</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Exit Strategy+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Exit_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Exit_Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822118,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Summary of Remediation Plans and Status",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Summary_of_Remediation_Plans_and_Status.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Summary of Remediation Plans and Status",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the percentage (%) breakdown or number of facilities with remediation plans and status, without naming individual facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "When companies disclose an aggregated breakdown of suppliers' remediation plans and status it can give an indication of the overall compliance trends within their supply chain and can allow stakeholders to track progress over time.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the number of facilities with remediation plans (e.g., Corrective Action Plans) and their status (complete, on-track or behind schedule), without naming individual facilities. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Non-compliance<br>- Remediation<br>- Corrective action plans (CAPs)<br>- Status<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Example of a remediation plan would be Corrective Action Plans<br>- Examples of the status would be: complete, on-track or behind schedule)<br>- This is often a statement e.g. 50% of suppliers have remediation plans in progress, 10% of suppliers have completed their completed their corrective action plans.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "At tier 1 level",
        "Beyond tier 1",
        "Raw material level",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Summary of Remediation Plans and Status+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Summary_of_Remediation_Plans_and_Status+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Summary_of_Remediation_Plans_and_Status+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822128,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Remediation Plan and Status by Named Facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Remediation_Plan_and_Status_by_Named_Facilities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Remediation Plan and Status by Named Facilities",
      "question": "Does the company disclose Corrective Action Plans and the remediation status by named-facility?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "When companies disclose remediation plans and status by named facilities it shows a clear commitment to transparency from brands and can drive improvements in supplier compliance. It also provides stakeholders with useful information that can enable labour and environmental issues to be resolved quickly and collaboratively.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses remediation status by named-facility (complete, on-track, behind schedule). <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Noncompliance<br>- Remediation<br>- Corrective action plans (CAPs)<br>- Status<br>- supplier list<br>- supplier name <br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Example of a remediation plan would be Corrective Action Plans<br>- Examples of the status would be: complete, on-track or behind schedule)<br>- Where brands are publishing tier one supplier list in Section 3 and are members of the Bangladesh/Transition Accord, and the Accord is linked to from the brand's own website, then they should receive these points. This is because you could technically cross-reference their list with the Accord reports and find inspection reports and corrective action plans for specific factories. <br>- Bangladesh Alliance no longer counts as it has ceased operations.<br>- Bangladesh Accord applies for tier 1 level and beyond tier 1 level</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "At tier 1 level",
        "Beyond tier 1",
        "Raw material level",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Remediation Plan and Status by Named Facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Remediation_Plan_and_Status_by_Named_Facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Remediation_Plan_and_Status_by_Named_Facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822138,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Mechanism - Direct Employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Direct_Employees.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism - Direct Employees",
      "question": "Does the company describe a confidential whistleblowing or grievance mechanism (e.g. web form, email, hotline) for direct employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Grievance mechanisms or whistleblowing channels allow direct employees in the company to report any human rights or environmental issues to upper management so that action can be taken to address issues raised.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses if has a confidential mechanism in place to capture human rights and environmental grievances from direct employees. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Grievance mechanisms<br>- Whistleblowing<br>- Ethics Line/Point<br>- Email Addresses<br>- @<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind: </strong><br>- No points given if whistleblowing is only for reasons of financial misconduct<br>- The grievance mechanism itself must be published, not sufficient if they just say that they have it in place</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Mechanism - Direct Employees+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Direct_Employees+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Grievance_Mechanisms.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Direct_Employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822148,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Mechanism Implementation - Direct Employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Implementation_Direct_Employees.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism Implementation - Direct Employees",
      "question": "Does the company explain how the whistleblowing or grievance mechanism for direct employees is implemented?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Grievance mechanisms or whistleblowing channels allow direct employees in the company to report any human rights or environmental issues to upper management so that action can be taken to address issues raised.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses how it implements its grievance or whistleblowing mechanism for direct employees. Start by looking for a public disclosure detailing how the company capture human rights and environmental grievances from direct employees. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Grievance mechanisms<br>- Whistleblowing<br>- Ethics Line/Point<br>- Email Addresses <br>- @<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind: </strong><br>- No points given if whistleblowing is only for reasons of financial misconduct<br>- An example of how the mechanism is implemented is an explanation of how the company responds to complaints and/or reported violations of policies and standards</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Mechanism Implementation - Direct Employees+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 573,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Implementation_Direct_Employees+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Implementation_Direct_Employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822158,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Reporting - Direct Employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Reporting_Direct_Employees.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Grievance Reporting - Direct Employees",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the number of reported violations or grievances from direct employees that are filed, addressed and resolved?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Grievance mechanisms or whistleblowing channels allow direct employees in the company to report any human rights or environmental issues to upper management so that action can be taken to address issues raised. Disclosing data findings demonstrates that a company is taking active steps to implement this grievance mechanism and resolve any grievances filed.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses the number of violations or grievances from direct empolyees that were filed, addressed and resolved. Start by looking for a public disclosure detailing how the company captures and addresses human rights and environmental grievances from direct employees. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Grievance mechanisms<br>- Whistleblowing<br>- Ethics Line/Point<br>- Email Addresses <br>- @<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind: </strong><br>- No points given if whistleblowing is only for reasons of financial misconduct<br>- The company should receive the point for discloses data about the grievances if they disclose the number of grievances filed. The company should not receive the point if they only disclose the number of grievances address or resolved without disclosing the number of grievances made in the first place. Best practice is when companies disclose all three.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Reporting - Direct Employees+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 573,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Reporting_Direct_Employees+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Reporting_Direct_Employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822168,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Mechanism - Supply Chain Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Supply_Chain_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism - Supply Chain Workers",
      "question": "Does the company describe a confidential whistleblowing or grievance mechanism (e.g. web form, email, hotline) for supply chain workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Confidential grievance mechanisms or whistleblowing channels enable workers in the supply chain to report any human rights or environmental issues directly to the company so that action can be taken to address issues raised.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company ensures human rights and environmental grievances from workers within their supply chain are captured and addressed. Start by looking for public disclosure detailing how the company captures and addresses human rights and environmental grievances from employees in the supply chain.<br><br>Please note: Reports published after January 18<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Grievance mechanisms<br>- Whistleblowing<br>- Ethics Line/Point<br>- Email Addresses <br>- @<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind: </strong><br>- No points given if whistleblowing is only for reasons of financial misconduct<br>- No points given if onus is solely on the supplier to set up a grievance mechanism<br>- The grievance mechanism itself must be published in public documents of the company. It is not sufficient if they just say that they have it in place.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Mechanism - Supply Chain Workers+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Supply_Chain_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Grievance_Mechanisms.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Supply_Chain_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822178,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Mechanism Implementation - Supply Chain Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Implementation_Supply_Chain_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism Implementation - Supply Chain Workers",
      "question": "Does the company explain how the whistleblowing or grievance mechanism for supply chain workers is implemented?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Confidential grievance mechanisms or whistleblowing channels enable workers in the supply chain to report any human rights or environmental issues directly to the company so that action can be taken to address issues raised.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company ensures human rights and environmental grievances from workers within their supply chain are captured and addressed. Start by looking for public disclosure detailing how the company captures and addresses human rights and environmental grievances from employees in the supply chain.<br><br>Please note: Reports published after January 18<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Grievance mechanisms<br>- Whistleblowing<br>- Ethics Line/Point<br>- Email Addresses <br>- @<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind: </strong><br>- No points given if whistleblowing is only for reasons of financial misconduct<br>- No points given if onus is solely on the supplier to set up a grievance mechanism</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Mechanism Implementation - Supply Chain Workers+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Implementation_Supply_Chain_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Implementation_Supply_Chain_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822188,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Mechanism Disseminated to Supply Chain Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Disseminated_to_Supply_Chain_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism Disseminated to Supply Chain Workers",
      "question": "Does the company explain how supply chain workers are informed of the whistleblowing or grievance mechanism?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Confidential grievance mechanisms or whistleblowing channels enable workers in the supply chain to report any human rights or environmental issues directly to the company so that action can be taken to address issues raised.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company ensures human rights and environmental grievances from workers within their supply chain are captured and addressed. Start by looking for public disclosure detailing how the company captures and addresses human rights and environmental grievances from employees in the supply chain.<br><br>Please note: Reports published after January 18<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Grievance mechanisms<br>- Whistleblowing<br>- Ethics Line/Point<br>- Email Addresses <br>- @<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind: </strong><br>- No points given if whistleblowing is only for reasons of financial misconduct<br>- No points given if onus is solely on the supplier to set up a grievance mechanism<br>- Examples of how workers might be informed about the grievance mechanisms available could be; posted on a wall or board in the facility or via a training session.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Mechanism Disseminated to Supply Chain Workers+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Disseminated_to_Supply_Chain_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Disseminated_to_Supply_Chain_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822198,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Mechanism in Supplier Policies",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_in_Supplier_Policies.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism in Supplier Policies",
      "question": "Does the company disclose if the whistleblowing procedure or grievance mechanism is included in the supplier/vendor policies?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Confidential grievance mechanisms or whistleblowing channels enable workers in the supply chain to report any human rights or environmental issues directly to the company so that action can be taken to address issues raised.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company ensures human rights and environmental grievances from workers within their supply chain are captured and addressed. Start by looking for public disclosure detailing how the company captures and addresses human rights and environmental grievances from employees in the supply chain.<br><br>Please note: Reports published after January 18<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Grievance mechanisms<br>- Whistleblowing<br>- Ethics Line/Point<br>- Email Addresses <br>- @<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind: </strong><br>- No points given if whistleblowing is only for reasons of financial misconduct<br>- No points given if onus is solely on the supplier to set up a grievance mechanism<br>- In the supplier/vendor policies (e.g. Code of Conduct) the grievance mechanism itself must be published. It is not sufficient if they just say that they have it in place.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Mechanism in Supplier Policies+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_in_Supplier_Policies+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_in_Supplier_Policies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822208,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Reporting - Supply Chain Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Reporting_Supply_Chain_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Grievance Reporting - Supply Chain Workers",
      "question": "Does the company disclose data about the number of reported violations or grievances from supply chain workers that are filed, addressed and resolved?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Confidential grievance mechanisms or whistleblowing channels enable workers in the supply chain to report any human rights or environmental issues directly to the company so that action can be taken to address issues raised. Disclosing data findings demonstrates that a company is taking active steps to implement this grievance mechanism and resolve any grievances filed.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company ensures human rights and environmental grievances from workers within their supply chain are captured and addressed. Start by looking for public disclosure detailing how the company captures and addresses human rights and environmental grievances from employees in the supply chain.<br><br>Please note: Reports published after January 18<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Grievance mechanisms<br>- Whistleblowing<br>- Ethics Line/Point<br>- Email Addresses <br>- @<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind: </strong><br>- No points given if whistleblowing is only for reasons of financial misconduct<br>- The company should receive the point for discloses data about the grievances if they disclose only the number of grievances filed. The company should not receive the point if they disclose the number of grievances address or resolved without disclosing the number of grievances made in the first place. Best practice is when companies disclose all three.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Reporting - Supply Chain Workers+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Reporting_Supply_Chain_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Reporting_Supply_Chain_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822218,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Approach to Recruitment Fees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Approach_to_Recruitment_Fees.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Approach to Recruitment Fees",
      "question": "Does the company disclose their approach to recruitment fees in the supply chain, including whether the company requires that no fees or related costs be charged to supply chain workers during recruitment processes and that the company ensures that fees or related costs paid by workers are reimbursed?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "A major cause of forced labour in today’s global supply chains is the charging of recruitment fees to migrant workers. Such payments can create situations of debt bondage and leave low-wage workers vulnerable to human trafficking and further exploitation. When a company discloses information about its approach to recruitment fees being paid by workers in the supply chain it demonstrates that the company is taking steps to address and mitigate the prevalence of modern slavery.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company states their approach to recruitment fees in the supply chain, such as ensuring no fees or related costs be charged to supply chain workers during recruitment processes.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Recruitment<br>- Modern Slavery<br>- Forced Labour<br>- Bonded Labour<br>- Migrant workers<br>- Recruitment Fees <br>- Debt bondage<br>- Employer Pays Principle<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- A good place to look for information on modern slavery might be a company's Modern Slavery Statement or a California Transparency in Supply Chains Act statement.<br>- This could be signing up to the Employer Pays Principle</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Approach to Recruitment Fees+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 795,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 313,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Approach_to_Recruitment_Fees+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Approach_to_Recruitment_Fees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822228,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Supplier's Recruitment Agencies",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supplier_s_Recruitment_Agencies.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Supplier's Recruitment Agencies",
      "question": "Does the company disclose information on the recruitment agencies used by its suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "A major cause of forced labour in today’s global supply chains is the charging of recruitment fees to migrant workers. Such payments can create situations of debt bondage and leave low-wage workers vulnerable to human trafficking and further exploitation. When a company discloses information about its approach to recruitment fees being paid by workers in the supply chain it demonstrates that the company is taking steps to address and mitigate the prevalence of modern slavery.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses information on the recruitment agencies used by its suppliers.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Recruitment Agency<br>- Modern Slavery<br>- Forced Labour<br>- Bonded Labour<br>- Migrant workers<br>- Recruitment Fees <br>- Debt bondage<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- A good place to look for information on modern slavery might be a company's Modern Slavery Statement or a California Transparency in Supply Chains Act statement.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Supplier's Recruitment Agencies+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supplier_s_Recruitment_Agencies+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supplier_s_Recruitment_Agencies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822238,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Conducts Worker Interviews on Recruitment Process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Conducts_Worker_Interviews_on_Recruitment_Process.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Conducts Worker Interviews on Recruitment Process",
      "question": "Does the company disclose whether interviews are conducted with workers about their recruitment journey to establish if any fees or related costs have been paid?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "A major cause of forced labour in today’s global supply chains is the charging of recruitment fees to migrant workers. Such payments can create situations of debt bondage and leave low-wage workers vulnerable to human trafficking and further exploitation. Interviews with workers specifically about their recruitment journey can help a company detect indicators of modern slavery related violations.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company interview workers within their supply chain to understand more about the recruitment journeys they have been through and if they were required to pay any fees or related costs.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Recruitment Agency<br>- Modern Slavery<br>- Forced Labour<br>- Bonded Labour<br>- Migrant workers<br>- Recruitment Fees <br>- Debt bondage<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- A good place to look for information on modern slavery might be a company's Modern Slavery Statement or a California Transparency in Supply Chains Act statement.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Conducts Worker Interviews on Recruitment Process+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 295,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Conducts_Worker_Interviews_on_Recruitment_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Conducts_Worker_Interviews_on_Recruitment_Process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822248,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Data on Modern Slavery Prevalence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Data_on_Modern_Slavery_Prevalence.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Data on Modern Slavery Prevalence",
      "question": "Does the company publish data on the prevalence of modern slavery related violations in supplier facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "When a company discloses data on the prevalence of modern slavery related violations identified in its supply chain, such as when workers pay recruitment fees or their passports are withheld, it demonstrates that the company is taking steps to identify, address, prevent or remedy the prevalence of modern slavery.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses data on the prevalence of modern slavery related violations in their supply chain. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Recruitment Agency<br>- Modern Slavery<br>- Forced Labour<br>- Bonded Labour<br>- Migrant workers<br>- Recruitment Fees <br>- Debt bondage<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Examples of modern slavery related violations include; restricted freedom of movement, retaining workers' passports or other identity/personal documents, forced overtime, withholding wages, debt bondage, grievances related to recruitment practices<br>- A good place to look for information on modern slavery might be a company's Modern Slavery Statement or a California Transparency in Supply Chains Act statement.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Data on Modern Slavery Prevalence+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 796,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 313,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Data_on_Modern_Slavery_Prevalence+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Data_on_Modern_Slavery_Prevalence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822258,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Approach to Living Wage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Approach_to_Living_Wage.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Approach to Living Wage",
      "question": "Does the company disclose their approach to achieving the payment of living wages to workers in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The majority of garment workers around the world are paid below a living wage rate. When a company discloses information about its approach towards achieving the payment of living wages to workers in the supply chain, it demonstrates that the company considers this issue important.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company describes its approach to achieving the payment of living wages to workers in the supply chain. The living wage questions refer to garment workers, factory workers and other supply chain producer involved in production. It doesn't include retail workers, warehouse staff or other employees in the company's owned operations. This question must be evidenced through a credible process such as ACT membership, Fair Wear Foundation Fair Wage Ladder, Fairtrade Textile Standard, FLA's Fair Compensation Strategy. With regards to disclosure of membership in multi-stakeholder initiatives, best practice would include a description of what specific measures the brand is taking beyond disclosure of membership to the MSI. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or <br>- California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Living wage<br>- Anker methodology<br>- Asia Floor Wage<br>- ACT<br>- Fair Labor Association<br>- Fair Wage Ladder <br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- The living wage questions refer to garment workers, factory workers and other supply chain producer involved in production. It doesn't include retail workers, warehouse staff or other employees in the company's owned operations.<br>- This question must be evidenced through a credible process such as ACT membership, Fair Wear Foundation’s Fair Wage Ladder, Fairtrade Textile Standard, FLA's Fair Compensation Strategy.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Approach to Living Wage+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1554,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 348,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Approach_to_Living_Wage+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Public_Commitment_on_Living_Wage_Combined.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Approach_to_Living_Wage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822268,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Strategy to Achieving Living Wage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Strategy_to_Achieving_Living_Wage.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Strategy to Achieving Living Wage",
      "question": "Does the company publish a time-bound, measurable roadmap/strategy for how it will achieve a living wage for all workers across its supplier chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The majority of garment workers around the world are paid below a living wage rate. A wage increase is an urgent matter for supply chain workers enabling them to support themselves and their families. When a company discloses a time-bound commitment to paying living wages for all workers within its supply chain then it shows that it plans to take urgent and active steps towards increasing wages for workers.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes a time-bound, measurable roadmap/strategy for how it will achieve a living wage for all workers across its supplier chain.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or <br>- California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Living wage<br>- ACT<br>- Fair Labor Association<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- The living wage questions refer to garment workers, factory workers and other supply chain producers working within the companies supply chain only and not the companies direct workers</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Strategy to Achieving Living Wage+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1554,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 348,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Strategy_to_Achieving_Living_Wage+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wage_Action_Plan_Combined.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Strategy_to_Achieving_Living_Wage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822278,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress toward the payment of a Living Wage to workers in the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_toward_the_payment_of_a_Living_Wage_to_workers_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress toward the payment of a Living Wage to workers in the supply chain",
      "question": "Does the company report annual, measurable progress towards paying living wages to workers in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The majority of garment workers around the world are paid below a living wage rate. A wage increase is an urgent matter for supply chain workers enabling them to support themselves and their families. When a company reports annually on progress towards the payment of living wages to workers in its supply chain, it gives stakeholders an indication of the outcomes of a company's efforts to increase workers' wages.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company reports on annual measurable progress on achieving the payment of a living wage for workers within the supply chain. This could include data such as the number of wage management systems set up/improved, the outcomes of worker capacity building related to wage increases, outcomes of participation in initiatives such as ACT or FLA, the % of wage increases workers in the supply chain have received as result of brand's effort to improve wages, etc.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>No points will be awarded for this indicator if no roadmap or strategy is disclosed in the previous metric.</p>\r\n<p><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or <br>- California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Living wage<br>- ACT<br>- Fair Labor Association<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- The living wage questions refer to garment workers, factory workers and other supply chain producer involved in production. It doesn't include retail workers, warehouse staff or other employees in the company's owned operations.<br>- This could include data such as the number of wage management systems set up/improved, the outcomes of worker capacity building related to wage increases, outcomes of participation in initiatives such as ACT or FLA, the % of wage increases workers in the supply chain have received as result of brand's effort to improve wages, etc.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress toward the payment of a Living Wage to workers in the supply chain+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1527,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 346,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_toward_the_payment_of_a_Living_Wage_to_workers_in_the_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_toward_the_payment_of_a_Living_Wage_to_workers_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822288,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Living Wage Estimates Used for Benchmarking",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Living_Wage_Estimates_Used_for_Benchmarking.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Living Wage Estimates Used for Benchmarking",
      "question": "Does the company disclose what living wage estimates they use to track and benchmark wages for workers in its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "When a company discloses the living wage methodology it uses to benchmark the wage rates that workers are paid in its supply chain, it allows stakeholders to scrutinise the credibility of the company's approach.",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>2025 Methodology update</strong><br>We are looking for information about how brands calculate and benchmark living wage rates for workers in their supply chain, such as by using the Anker methodology, Asia Floor Wage or WageIndicator Foundation data. They could be using multiple benchmarks. We will also accept if the brand uses in-house methods of calculating living wages but only if they disclose their calculation methodology. Please note, disclosure on membership to initiatives alone is not sufficient to receive points. <br><br><strong>Previous Methodology</strong><br>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses what living wage estimates they use to track and benchmark wages for workers in its supply chain.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or <br>- California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Living wage<br>- Anker methodology<br>- Asia Floor Wage<br>- ACT<br>- Fair Labor Association<br>- Fair Wage Ladder <br>- WageIndicator Foundation data<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- We are looking for information about how brands calculate and benchmark living wage rates for workers in their supply chain, such as by using the Anker methodology, Asia Floor Wage or WageIndicator Foundation data. They could be using multiple benchmarks.<br>- We will also accept if the brand uses in-house methods of calculating living wages but only if they disclose their calculation methodology.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Living Wage Estimates Used for Benchmarking+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1482,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 301,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Living_Wage_Estimates_Used_for_Benchmarking+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Uses_Living_Wage_Benchmark_Combined.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Living_Wage_Estimates_Used_for_Benchmarking+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822298,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Percentage of Workers Paid Above Minimum Wage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Percentage_of_Workers_Paid_Above_Minimum_Wage.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Percentage of Workers Paid Above Minimum Wage",
      "question": "Does the company publish the % above the minimum wage workers are getting paid in its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Disclosing wage data for workers in the supply chain demonstrates tangible outcomes of the company’s efforts to increase wages and take steps towards the payment of living wages to workers in its supply chain.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the percentage (%) above the minimum wage that workers are paid in its supply chain.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or <br>- California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Living wage<br>- Workers<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Will accept if data only covers a small number of selected supplier facilities <br>- The living wage questions refer to garment workers, factory workers and other supply chain producer involved in production. It doesn't include retail workers, warehouse staff or other employees in the company's owned operations.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Percentage of Workers Paid Above Minimum Wage+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1527,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 346,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Percentage_of_Workers_Paid_Above_Minimum_Wage+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Percentage_of_Workers_Paid_Above_Minimum_Wage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822308,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Percentage or Number of Workers Earning a Living Wage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Percentage_or_Number_of_Workers_Earning_a_Living_Wage.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Percentage or Number of Workers Earning a Living Wage",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the % or number of workers in supply chain that are being paid a living wage rate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Disclosing wage data for workers in the supply chain demonstrates tangible outcomes of the company’s efforts to increase wages and take steps towards the payment of living wages to workers in its supply chain.",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>2025 Methodology update</strong><br>Will accept if data only if the living wage methodology used is disclosed. For example, the disclosure must be against a target that has been determined using credible methodologies such as the Anker methodology, Asia Floor Wage or WageIndicator Foundation. Unsubstantiated disclosure will not be accepted. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Previous Methodology</strong><br><br>In this question you are being asked to identify whether company discloses the percentage (%) above the minimum wage that workers are getting paid in its supply chain.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or <br>- California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Living wage<br>- Workers<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Will accept if data only covers a small number of selected supplier facilities <br>- The living wage questions refer to garment workers, factory workers and other supply chain producers involved in production. It doesn't include retail workers, warehouse staff or other employees in the company's owned operations.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Percentage or Number of Workers Earning a Living Wage+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1527,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 346,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Percentage_or_Number_of_Workers_Earning_a_Living_Wage+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Percentage_or_Number_of_Workers_Earning_a_Living_Wage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822318,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Protects Labour Costs in Price Negotiations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Protects_Labour_Costs_in_Price_Negotiations.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Protects Labour Costs in Price Negotiations",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its method for calculating and ring-fencing labour costs in price negotiations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers. Ensuring that adequate labour costs are factored into price negoitations is one way to ensure that the payment of living wages to workers in the supply chain is possible.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses their method for calculating and ring-fencing labour costs in price negotiations.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or <br>- California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Ring-fencing<br>- Labour Isolation<br>- Labour cost<br>- Purchasing Practices<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Ring-fencing labour cost such as wage rates + overtime, social security, sick leave, vacation and other forms of leave as well as the cost of indirect labour and wage increases<br>- Most of these indicators are required as part of ACT brand membership.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Protects Labour Costs in Price Negotiations+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1095,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 347,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Protects_Labour_Costs_in_Price_Negotiations+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Isolating_Labour_Cost_Combined.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Protects_Labour_Costs_in_Price_Negotiations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822328,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Orders with Labor Cost Protection",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Orders_with_Labor_Cost_Protection.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Quantity of Orders with Labor Cost Protection",
      "question": "Does the company publish the % of orders/volume for which wages and other labour costs (such as wages increases) are isolated/ring-fenced?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers. Ensuring that adequate labour costs are factored into price negoitations is one way to ensure that the payment of living wages to workers in the supply chain is possible.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the percentage (%) of orders/volume for which wages and other labour costs (such as wages increases) are isolated/ring-fenced.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or <br>- California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Ring-fencing<br>- Labour Isolation<br>- Labour cost<br>- Purchasing Practices<br>- Orders<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- if a brand discloses this it is industry best practice</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Orders with Labor Cost Protection+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Orders_with_Labor_Cost_Protection+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Orders_with_Labor_Cost_Protection+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822338,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Policy to Pay Supplier Within 60 Days",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Policy_to_Pay_Supplier_Within_60_Days.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Policy to Pay Supplier Within 60 Days",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a policy to pay suppliers within a maximum of 60 days?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers. Prompt and fair terms of payment helps suppliers with cash flow enabling them to pay workers on time and adequately.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses having a policy to pay suppliers within a maximum of 60 days.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or <br>- California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Prompt payment<br>- Policy<br>- Purchasing Practices<br>- 60 days<br>- 30 days<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- A policy on timely supplier payments might for example be put in place via UK Prompt Payment Code commitments</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Policy to Pay Supplier Within 60 Days+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Policy_to_Pay_Supplier_Within_60_Days+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Policy_to_Pay_Supplier_Within_60_Days+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822348,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Orders Paid On-time",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Orders_Paid_On_time.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Quantity of Orders Paid On-time",
      "question": "Does the company publish the % of orders with on-time payment to suppliers, according to agreed terms?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers. Prompt and fair terms of payment helps suppliers with cash flow enabling them to pay workers on time and adequately.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes the percentage (%) of orders with on-time payment to suppliers, according to agreed terms.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or <br>- California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- On-time<br>- Purchase Order<br>- Purchasing Practices<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Extended and long payment terms can impact a supplier’s ability to provide decent employment conditions</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Orders Paid On-time+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Orders_Paid_On_time+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Orders_Paid_On_time+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822358,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Orders Changed After Original Agreement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Orders_Changed_After_Original_Agreement.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Quantity of Orders Changed After Original Agreement",
      "question": "Does the company publish the % of retrospective changes made to orders or payment terms after the original purchase order agreement was made?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers. Making last minute changes to product design and purchase agreements can create knock-on effects for workers who may be forced to work excessive overtime in order to deliver these changes.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the percentage (%) of retrospective changes made to orders or payment terms after the original purchase order agreement was made.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or <br>- California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Purchasing Practices<br>- Payment terms<br>- Purchase order<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- When a company fails to meet agreed payment terms it can have server impact on the workers within its supply chain</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Orders Changed After Original Agreement+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1028,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 296,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Orders_Changed_After_Original_Agreement+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Orders_Changed_After_Original_Agreement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822368,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Supplier Feedback on Purchasing Practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Supplier_Feedback_on_Purchasing_Practices.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Supplier Feedback on Purchasing Practices",
      "question": "Does the company disclose supplier feedback on the company's purchasing practices through a formal process?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers. Disclosure of suppliers' feedback on the company's purchasing practices through a formal process shows that the company is listening and taking steps to improve their practices.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses supplier feedback on the its purchasing practices through a formal process.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or <br>- California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Better Buying<br>- Supplier feedback<br>- Purchasing Practices<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Publishing of supplier feedback might happen via the Better Buying platform, Supplier Summits, internal surveys of suppliers of brands’ purchasing practices<br>- Feedback itself must be publish, not enough to state that feedback is gathered<br>- Audits not sufficient</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Supplier Feedback on Purchasing Practices+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Supplier_Feedback_on_Purchasing_Practices+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Supplier_Feedback_on_Purchasing_Practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822378,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses number or % of supplier facilities that have independent, democratically elected trade unions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_number_or_of_supplier_facilities_that_have_independent_democratically_elected_trade_unions.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses number or % of supplier facilities that have independent, democratically elected trade unions",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the number or % of supplier facilities that have independent, democratically elected trade unions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Freedom of association and collective bargaining are fundamental labour rights enshrined within international law. When workers are able to freely join independent, democratically elected unions they are able to take collective action to negotiate with their employers for better working conditions, including wages and benefits.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the number or percentage (%) of supplier facilities that have independent, democratically elected unions. We are looking for this information for at least product manufacturing factories. Worker-management or worker participation committees do not count, we are looking for trade unions specifically. Note: some geographies do not permit independent unions. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Trade Union<br>- Collective bargaining<br>- Freedom of Association<br><br><strong>
Things to watch out for: </strong><br>- Worker-management or worker participation committees do not count, we are looking for democratically elected trade unions specifically <br>- Must be in supply chain, information relating to the companies own employees does not count for this question</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses number or % of supplier facilities that have independent, democratically elected trade unions+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1532,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 347,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_number_or_of_supplier_facilities_that_have_independent_democratically_elected_trade_unions+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_number_or_of_supplier_facilities_that_have_independent_democratically_elected_trade_unions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822388,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses number or % of Workers covered by Collective Bargaining Agreements",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_number_or_of_Workers_covered_by_Collective_Bargaining_Agreements.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses number or % of Workers covered by Collective Bargaining Agreements",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the number or % of workers in the supply chain that are covered by collective bargaining agreements?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Collective bargaining agreements allow employers and unions to negotiate on important issues such as fair wages and working conditions.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the number or percentage (%) of workers in the supply chain that are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Freedom of association is an enabling right. Engaging with workers and their representatives is critical in achieving a Just Transition. Brands have a responsibility to respect workers' freedom of association and their right to collectively bargain on working conditions, including how their jobs will be affected by climate strategies.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Trade Union<br>- Collective bargaining<br>- Freedom of Association<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for: </strong><br>- Must be in supply chain<br>- Global Framework Agreements are good examples</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses number or % of Workers covered by Collective Bargaining Agreements+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1532,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 347,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_number_or_of_Workers_covered_by_Collective_Bargaining_Agreements+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_number_or_of_Workers_covered_by_Collective_Bargaining_Agreements+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822398,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Approach to Involving Women in Human Rights Due Diligence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Approach_to_Involving_Women_in_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Approach to Involving Women in Human Rights Due Diligence",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how it involves potentially affected women, women’s organisations, women human rights defenders and gender experts in all stages of human rights due diligence?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Including the participation of affected women stakeholders and gender experts in a company's due diligence processes shows that a company is taking steps to understand, address, prevent and remedy gender specific issues in the supply chain.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses how it involves potentially affected women, women’s organisations, women human rights defenders and gender experts in all stages of its human rights due diligence.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Due Diligence<br>- Risk Assessment<br>- Gender Equality<br>- Women<br>- Stakeholders<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- This point can only be give if they describe the process for involving potentially affected women in ALL aspects of human rights due diligence</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Approach to Involving Women in Human Rights Due Diligence+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Approach_to_Involving_Women_in_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Approach_to_Involving_Women_in_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822408,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Gender-based Labour Violations Data",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Gender_based_Labour_Violations_Data.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Gender-based Labour Violations Data",
      "question": "Does the company publish data on the prevalence of gender-based labour violations within its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Publishing data on gender-based violations in the supply chain shows that a company is committed to working to identify and improve conditions for female supply chain workers.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses data on the prevalence of gender-based labour violations in the supply chain. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Gender equality<br>- Sexual harassment<br>- Gender-based violence<br>- Labour violations<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind: </strong><br>- For example we are looking for data related to sexual harassment and other forms of gender-based violence; treatment and firing of pregnant workers; maternity pay; bathroom breaks during periods, etc; women in supervisor/middle management roles; gender pay gap; women on Worker Participations Committees and in unions; etc.<br>- We are looking for data that covers workers within the company supply chain, not their own employees</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Gender-based Labour Violations Data+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Gender_based_Labour_Violations_Data+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Gender_based_Labour_Violations_Data+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822418,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Sex-disaggregated Job Distribution",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Sex_disaggregated_Job_Distribution.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Sex-disaggregated Job Distribution",
      "question": "At which levels of its operations does the company publish annual sex-disaggregated distribution of job roles?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Disclosure of sex-disaggregated data on job roles both within the operations of a company and within its supply chain helps the company and stakeholders better understand gender disparities and to design initiatives to empower and upskill women.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses data on the annual sex-disaggregated distribution of job roles throughout their own operations and supply chain.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Gender equality<br>- Executive <br>- Managers<br>- Women<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind: </strong><br>- In the supply chain, this could be gender breakdown of employees such as helpers, machinists verses supervisors/managers<br>- In the company's own operations, this could be the gender breakdown of executive level, managers/supervisors vs employees</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Own operations",
        "Supply chain",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Sex-disaggregated Job Distribution+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Sex_disaggregated_Job_Distribution+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Sex_disaggregated_Job_Distribution+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822428,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Gender Pay Gap",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Gender_Pay_Gap.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Gender Pay Gap",
      "question": "Does the company publish its annual gender pay gap?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Gender pay gap data is an important indicator of what a company is doing to ensure gender parity and tackle systemic gender discrimination.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes an annual gender pay gap report (e.g. as required by UK law beginning in April 2017).<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Gender Pay Gap Disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Gender equality<br>- Gender pay gap<br>- Pay equity<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind: </strong><br>- Often found as a separate document<br>- This is a required by UK law beginning in April 2017</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth"
      ],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Gender Pay Gap+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Gender_Pay_Gap+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Gender_Pay_Gap+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822438,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Products Produced",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Products_Produced.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Quantity of Products Produced",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the quantity of products produced during the annual reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Disclosing data on the amount of clothing and products made by a company annually gives external stakeholders insight into global production and consumption patterns. It helps us understand which companies are contributing most to the overall volume of clothing made each year.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the quantity of products they produced per year. <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">We are looking to see how many individual items a brand produced in the past year — for example, “We produced 1.5 billion products in 2024.” This indicator is aligned with The OR Foundation's Speak Volumes campaign, and refers specifically to the count of products, not their weight or volume.</span></p>\r\n<p><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Product volume<br>- Produced this year<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- We are looking to see how many items brands produced in the past year. For example, 'we produced over 1.5 billion products in 2019.'</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Products Produced+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1523,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 9,
      "companies": 342,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Products_Produced+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Products_Produced+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822448,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Product / Textile Waste Generated During The Annual Reporting Period",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Product_Textile_Waste_Generated_During_The_Annual_Reporting_Period.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Product / Textile Waste Generated During The Annual Reporting Period",
      "question": "Does the company publish the % or tonnes of product/textile waste generated during the annual reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Publishing data on the volume of textile/product waste generated annually demonstrates that a company is taking steps to measure and understand its approach to waste management.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses the quantity of products produced during the annual reporting period.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Textile<br>- Waste<br>- Production waste<br>
- Offcut<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- We will accept information provided that is both a % or number of tonnes <br>- This information should be relating to the last reporting period and we will not accept information for previous reporting periods before 2018</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Product / Textile Waste Generated During The Annual Reporting Period+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Product_Textile_Waste_Generated_During_The_Annual_Reporting_Period+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Product_Textile_Waste_Generated_During_The_Annual_Reporting_Period+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822458,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Products Destroyed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Products_Destroyed.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Quantity of Products Destroyed",
      "question": "Does the company publish the % or tonnes of product volume or number of items destroyed (typically incinerated) during the annual reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Publishing data on textile/product incineration shows that a company is taking steps to measure and understand its approach to responsible waste management. It also enables external stakeholders to hold companies to account for incinerating perfectly good materials and products.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether company publicly discloses the percentage (%) or tonnes of product volume or number of items destroyed (typically incinerated) during the annual reporting period. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Textile<br>- Product<br>- Waste <br>- Incineration<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind: </strong><br>- Brands typically destroy excess products by incineration but there are calls for this practise to stop</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Products Destroyed+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Products_Destroyed+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Products_Destroyed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822468,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Reducing Pre-Consumer Waste Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reducing_Pre_Consumer_Waste_Strategy.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Reducing Pre-Consumer Waste Strategy",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its strategy on reducing pre-consumer surplus/waste?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Around one quarter of the industry’s resources are wasted as leftovers of textile and garment production every year. This is why it is useful for understanding what a company is doing to reduce pre-consumer waste.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses a strategy towards reducing pre-consumer surplus/waste. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Textile<br>- Product<br>- Waste <br>- Pre-consumer<br>- Off-cuts<br>- Unsold and defective stock<br>- Samples<br>- Circularity<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Pre-consumer waste/surplus includes off-cuts, unsold and defective stock, production samples.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Reducing Pre-Consumer Waste Strategy+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reducing_Pre_Consumer_Waste_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reducing_Pre_Consumer_Waste_Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822478,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress On Reducing Pre-Consumer Waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_On_Reducing_Pre_Consumer_Waste.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress On Reducing Pre-Consumer Waste",
      "question": "Does the company disclose measurable progress towards reducing pre-consumer surplus/waste?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Around one quarter of the industry’s resources are wasted as leftovers of textile and garment production every year. This is why it is useful to understand what progress a company is making to reduce pre-consumer waste.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses measurable progress towards reducing pre-consumer surplus/waste. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Textile<br>- Product<br>- Waste <br>- Pre-consumer<br>- Off-cuts<br>- Unsold and defective stock<br>- Samples<br>- Circularity<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Pre-consumer waste/surplus includes off-cuts, unsold and defective stock, production samples.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress On Reducing Pre-Consumer Waste+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_On_Reducing_Pre_Consumer_Waste+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_On_Reducing_Pre_Consumer_Waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822488,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Offers Take-back Schemes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Offers_Take_back_Schemes.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Offers Take-back Schemes",
      "question": "Does the company offer permanent, year-round take-back schemes or in-store recycling?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Take-back clothing and textile recycling schemes encourage consumers to recycle their old garments rather throwing them into landfill. These schemes can help prolong the life of garments, enable clothing to be resold or reused and help facilitate textile-to-textile recycling.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company offers permanent, year-round take-back schemes/in-store recycling. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include: </strong><br>- Take-back<br>- Recycling<br>- In-store<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for: </strong><br>- One-off or irregular projects not sufficient for the point<br>- This can sometimes be in a FAQ for customers</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Offers Take-back Schemes+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Offers_Take_back_Schemes+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Offers_Take_back_Schemes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822498,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Offers Repair Services",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Offers_Repair_Services.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Offers Repair Services",
      "question": "Does the company offer and advertise repair services to their customers in order to help extend the life of products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Clothing repair services help customers to extend the life of their garments and enables materials to stay in circulation for longer, which reduces the overall environmental impact of a garment throughout its lifecycle.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company offers repair services in order to help extend the life of products.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include: </strong><br>- Repair<br>- Services<br>- Circular Economy<br>- Mending<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for: </strong><br>- This is often with information about the brands efforts towards a circular economy or in the FAQ section of their website for consumers</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Offers Repair Services+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Offers_Repair_Services+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Offers_Repair_Services+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822508,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Sustainable Materials Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Sustainable_Materials_Strategy.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Sustainable Materials Strategy",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a time-bound and measurable sustainable materials strategy, roadmap or targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This disclosure indicates that a company is taking a systemic and measurable approach to the integration of more sustainable materials in its products and collections.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes a time-bound and measurable sustainable materials strategy, roadmap or targets.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Materials<br>- Sustainable <br>- Cotton<br>- Leather<br>- Polyester<br>- Viscose<br>- Wool<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Examples of sustainable material targets include; what % of materials are made using conventional/virgin materials verses more sustainable materials such as organic/Fairtrade/BCI cotton, recycled/repurposed, recycled and sustainable wool, recycled polyester, chrome-free/recycled leather, sustainably sourced forest based fabrics.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Sustainable Materials Strategy+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1323,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Sustainable_Materials_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Sustainable_Materials_Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822518,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress on Sustainable Materials Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Sustainable_Materials_Strategy.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress on Sustainable Materials Strategy",
      "question": "Does the company publish annual progress on achieving sustainable material targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This disclosure demonstrates a company's measurable progress towards switching to the use of more sustainable materials and enables the company and its stakeholders to track progress over time. This disclosure can also highlight challenges and opportunities related to sourcing different sustainable materials.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes annual progress on achieving sustainable material targets (e.g. what % of materials are made using conventional/virgin materials verses more sustainable materials).<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Materials<br>- Sustainable <br>- Cotton<br>- Leather<br>- Polyester<br>- Viscose<br>- Wool<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Examples of sustainable material targets include; what % of materials are made using conventional/virgin materials verses more sustainable materials such as organic/Fairtrade/BCI cotton, recycled/repurposed, recycled and sustainable wool, recycled polyester, chrome-free/recycled leather, sustainably sourced forest based fabrics</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress on Sustainable Materials Strategy+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1323,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Sustainable_Materials_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Sustainable_Materials_Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822528,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Targets to Reduce Virgin Plastics",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Targets_to_Reduce_Virgin_Plastics.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Targets to Reduce Virgin Plastics",
      "question": "Does the company publish measurable, time-bound targets for the reduction of the use of virgin plastics?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Disclosing a strategy to reduce the use of virgin plastics shows that the company acknowledges that moving away from virgin plastics is necessary to minimise the environmental impacts of the materials and packaging the company uses.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes measurable, time-bound targets for the reduction of the use of virgin plastics.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Polyester<br>- Plastic<br>- Synthetic<br>- Materials<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Virgin plastics include textiles, accessories, hangers, packaging</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Targets to Reduce Virgin Plastics+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Targets_to_Reduce_Virgin_Plastics+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Targets_to_Reduce_Virgin_Plastics+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822538,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress to Reducing Virgin Plastics",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_to_Reducing_Virgin_Plastics.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress to Reducing Virgin Plastics",
      "question": "Does the company publish measurable progress towards reducing the use of virgin plastics?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Disclosing data on a company's progress towards reducing the use of virgin plastics shows that the company is taking active steps minimise the environmental impacts of the materials and packaging the company uses.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes measurable progress towards reducing the use of virgin plastics.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Polyester<br>- Plastic<br>- Synthetic<br>- Materials<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Virgin plastics include textiles, accessories, hangers, packaging</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress to Reducing Virgin Plastics+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_to_Reducing_Virgin_Plastics+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_to_Reducing_Virgin_Plastics+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822548,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Minimizing Impact of Microfibres",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Minimizing_Impact_of_Microfibres.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Minimizing Impact of Microfibres",
      "question": "Does the company disclose what they are doing to minimise the impact of microfibres?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Textiles are now the largest source of global primary microplastic pollution and have even been detected in the deepest parts of the ocean. This is why it is useful to understand what companies are doing to address and minimise the impact of microfibres on <br>\nDisclosing information on how the environment, oceans, marine animals and our health.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses what they are doing to minimise the impact of microfibers. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Microfibre/Microfiber<br>- Polyester<br>- Plastic<br>- Synthetic<br>- Materials<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- This could through testing of materials to understand microfibre impacts or partnering with research bodies to understand microfiber impacts or by supporting an industry body such as Ocean Clean Wash or the Outdoor Industry Association’s Microfibre Taskforce.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Minimizing Impact of Microfibres+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Minimizing_Impact_of_Microfibres+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Minimizing_Impact_of_Microfibres+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822558,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Evidence of Developing Circular Solutions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Evidence_of_Developing_Circular_Solutions.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Evidence of Developing Circular Solutions",
      "question": "Does the company disclose evidence of developing circular solutions that enable textile-to-textile recycling beyond reuse and downcycling?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The aim of textile-to-textile recycling is that eventually the fibres and textiles used in clothing will be able to be used repeatedly and for much longer, dramatically reducing the need to create new clothes from virgin resources. This is why it is useful to understand what companies are doing to invest in the development of these technologies and move towards a more circular system of production.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses evidence of developing circular solutions that enable textile to textile recycling beyond reuse and downcycling. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Circularity<br>- Closed-loop<br>- Recycling<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Examples of circular solutions include closed loop textile recycling<br>- Use of recycled materials is not sufficient</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Evidence of Developing Circular Solutions+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Evidence_of_Developing_Circular_Solutions+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Evidence_of_Developing_Circular_Solutions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822568,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses % of Circular Products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_of_Circular_Products.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses % of Circular Products",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the % of products that are designed to enable textile-to-textile recycling at end of life?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Disclosing the percentage of products designed to enable textile-textile recycling indicates a company’s progress on moving towards more circular systems of production.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the percentage (%) of products that are designed to enable closed loop or textile to textile recycling at end of life. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Circularity<br>- Closed-loop<br>- Recycling<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Use of recycled materials is not sufficient</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses % of Circular Products+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_of_Circular_Products+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_of_Circular_Products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822578,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Commitment to Eliminate Hazardous Chemicals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Commitment_to_Eliminate_Hazardous_Chemicals.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Commitment to Eliminate Hazardous Chemicals",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a time-bound commitment/roadmap to eliminate the use of hazardous chemicals as aligned with international standards such as ZDHC?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Many hazardous chemicals are used to treat, finish, dye and launder materials used in fashion. This disclosure indicates that a company is taking a systemic and measurable approach to reducing the hazardous chemicals used in its products.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses time-bound commitments/roadmaps to eliminate the use of hazardous chemicals. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Restricted Substance List<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Chemicals<br>- Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals (ZDHC)<br>- Detox<br>- Hazardous waste<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Must be aligned with international standards such as ZDHC</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Commitment to Eliminate Hazardous Chemicals+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
        "Fashion Revolution+Commitment to Eliminate Hazardous Chemicals+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Commitment_to_Eliminate_Hazardous_Chemicals+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Commitment_to_Eliminate_Hazardous_Chemicals+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Commitment_to_Eliminate_Hazardous_Chemicals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822588,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress to Eliminate Hazardous Chemicals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_to_Eliminate_Hazardous_Chemicals.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress to Eliminate Hazardous Chemicals",
      "question": "Does the company disclose measurable progress towards eliminating the use of hazardous chemicals as aligned with international standards such as ZDHC?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Many hazardous chemicals are used to treat, finish, dye and launder materials used in fashion. This disclosure indicates that a company making progress on its systemic and measurable approach towards reducing the hazardous chemicals used in its products.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses measurable progress towards eliminating the use of hazardous chemicals. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Restricted Substance List<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Chemicals<br>- Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals (ZDHC)<br>- Detox<br>- Hazardous waste<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Must be aligned with international standards such as ZDHC</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress to Eliminate Hazardous Chemicals+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress to Eliminate Hazardous Chemicals+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_to_Eliminate_Hazardous_Chemicals+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_to_Eliminate_Hazardous_Chemicals+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_to_Eliminate_Hazardous_Chemicals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822598,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Environmental Profit and Loss Statement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Environmental_Profit_and_Loss_Statement.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Environmental Profit and Loss Statement",
      "question": "Does the company publish a report that maps environmental impacts directly to its financial statements?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This disclosure indicates that a company is taking steps to integrate environmental impacts, including its business operations and its supply chain, into its profit motive and financial decision making processes.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes reports that maps social and environmental impacts directly to financial statements (e.g. Environmental P&amp;L). <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Environmental Profit and Loss<br>- Financial statements<br>- Social and Environmental Impacts<br>- Monetary value<br><br><strong>Things to watch out for: </strong><br>- This may also be in an Annual report or Integrated annual report</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Environmental Profit and Loss Statement+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Environmental_Profit_and_Loss_Statement+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Environmental_Profit_and_Loss_Statement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822608,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Science Based Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Science_Based_Targets.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Science Based Targets",
      "question": "Does the company publish Science Based Targets covering climate and/or other environmental topics?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Setting Science-Based Targets shows that a company is committed to reducing its carbon emissions in line with the Paris Agreement.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes Science Based Targets (such as those approved by Science Based Targets Initiative) covering climate and/or other environmental topics. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Science-based targets<br>- SBT<br>- Climate<br>- Carbon<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- These should be targets such as those approved by Science Based Targets Initiative</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Science Based Targets+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1323,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 10,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Science_Based_Targets+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Top_100_Fashion_Project_Research_Group+Science_Based_Targets.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Science_Based_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822618,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Zero Deforestation Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Zero_Deforestation_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Zero Deforestation Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company publish a time-bound, measurable commitment to zero deforestation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Limiting deforestation is a crucial part of mitigating global carbon emissions. A zero-deforestation commitment shows that the company is working to minimise its use of fibres derived from ancient and endangered forests and forested areas that have been cleared or converted.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes a time-bound, measurable commitment to zero deforestation. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Deforestation<br>- Forest<br>- Viscose<br>- Man-made cellulosic fibres<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Will not allow net zero deforestation which allows for the clearance or conversion of forests in one area as long as an equal area is replanted elsewhere. Looking for best practice on this issue which is zero deforestation.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Zero Deforestation Commitment+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Zero_Deforestation_Commitment+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Zero_Deforestation_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822628,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Carbon Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Carbon Emissions",
      "question": "At which levels of its operations does the company publish its annual carbon footprint or GHG emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Measuring and publishing carbon emissions data shows that a company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.<br><br>Please note: In 2022, the methodology was updated to state that the company will only receive the points for:<br><br>- '<strong>Supply chain</strong>' if they publish their annual value chain/scope 3 carbon footprint, focusing on detailed calculations on GHG emissions in the supply chain (e.g. at manufacturing and processing facilities, textile production), with estimations for downstream impacts</p>\r\n<p>- '<strong>Raw Material Level (2021 only)</strong>' if they publish their annual value chain/carbon footprint at a raw material level, with estimations for downstream impacts</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes their annual carbon footprint or GHG emissions at the different tiers of their supply chain.</p>\r\n<p><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Carbon<br>- Climate<br>- GHG<br>- Emissions<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.<br>- Suppliers could be publishing emissions through IPE.org.cn</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Owned and operated facilities",
        "Supply chain",
        "Raw material level (2021 only)",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Carbon Emissions+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Carbon Emissions+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Carbon Emissions+Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021 - Scoring",
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Carbon Emissions+Fashion Transparency Index 2024 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1323,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Emissions+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Emissions+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Emissions+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021_Scoring.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Emissions+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2024_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822638,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Renewable Energy Use",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Renewable_Energy_Use.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Renewable Energy Use",
      "question": "At which levels of its operations does the company publish its % of energy use coming from renewable sources?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing renewable energy data shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes the percentage (%) of energy use coming from renewable sources.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Renewable<br>- Energy<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Owned and operated facilities",
        "Supply chain",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Renewable Energy Use+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Renewable Energy Use+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Renewable Energy Use+Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Renewable_Energy_Use+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Renewable_Energy_Use+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Renewable_Energy_Use+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Renewable_Energy_Use+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5822648,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Water Use",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Water_Use.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Water Use",
      "question": "At which levels of its operations does the company publish its annual water footprint?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing water usage data shows that a company is taking steps to understand and reduce its water footprint across its operations and supply chain.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes its annual water footprint at the different tiers of their supply chain. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information</strong>:<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include</strong>:<br>- Water<br>- Footprint<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind</strong>:<br>- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.<br>- Fibre production/raw material level could include all fibres together or an individual breakdown of water use per fibre type</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Owned and operated facilities",
        "Manufacturing and processing facilities",
        "Raw material level",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.2 Achieve sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.6 Encourage companies to adopt sustainable practices and include sustainability information in their reporting."
      ],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Water Use+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Water Use+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Water_Use+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Water_Use+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Water_Use+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5948012,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Gender-based Labour Violations Data+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Gender_based_Labour_Violations_Data+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Gender-based Labour Violations Data",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Publishing data on gender-based violations in the supply chain shows that a company is committed to working to identify and improve conditions for female supply chain workers.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Gender_based_Labour_Violations_Data+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5948020,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Gender Pay Gap+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Gender_Pay_Gap+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Gender Pay Gap",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Gender pay gap data is an important indicator of what a company is doing to ensure gender parity and tackle systemic gender discrimination.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Gender_Pay_Gap+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5948273,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Sex-disaggregated Job Distribution+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Sex_disaggregated_Job_Distribution+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Sex-disaggregated Job Distribution",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Disclosure of sex-disaggregated data on job roles both within the operations of a company and within its supply chain helps the company and stakeholders better understand gender disparities and to design initiatives to empower and upskill women.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Own operations\":\"5\",\"Supply chain\":\"5\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Sex_disaggregated_Job_Distribution+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5948526,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Approach to Involving Women in Human Rights Due Diligence+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Approach_to_Involving_Women_in_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Approach to Involving Women in Human Rights Due Diligence",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Including the participation of affected women stakeholders and gender experts in a company's due diligence processes shows that a company is taking steps to understand, address, prevent and remedy gender specific issues in the supply chain. </p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1_Know_Show_Fix_Due_Diligence_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1A_Know_Show_Fix_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Approach_to_Involving_Women_in_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5948779,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses number or % of supplier facilities that have independent, democratically elected trade unions+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_number_or_of_supplier_facilities_that_have_independent_democratically_elected_trade_unions+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses number or % of supplier facilities that have independent, democratically elected trade unions",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Freedom of association and collective bargaining are fundamental labour rights enshrined within international law. When workers are able to freely join independent, democratically elected unions they are able to take collective action to negotiate with their employers for better working conditions, including wages and benefits.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1532,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 347,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Unionisation_and_Collective_Bargaining_Score_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Unionisation_and_Collective_Bargaining_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_number_or_of_supplier_facilities_that_have_independent_democratically_elected_trade_unions+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5949032,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses number or % of Workers covered by Collective Bargaining Agreements+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_number_or_of_Workers_covered_by_Collective_Bargaining_Agreements+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses number or % of Workers covered by Collective Bargaining Agreements",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Collective bargaining agreements allow employers and unions to negotiate on important issues such as fair wages and working conditions.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1532,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 347,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Unionisation_and_Collective_Bargaining_Score_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Unionisation_and_Collective_Bargaining_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_number_or_of_Workers_covered_by_Collective_Bargaining_Agreements+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5949285,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Supplier Feedback on Purchasing Practices+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Supplier_Feedback_on_Purchasing_Practices+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Supplier Feedback on Purchasing Practices",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers. Disclosure of suppliers' feedback on the company's purchasing practices through a formal process shows that the company is listening and taking steps to improve their practices.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Supplier_Feedback_on_Purchasing_Practices+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5949538,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Orders Changed After Original Agreement+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Orders_Changed_After_Original_Agreement+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Quantity of Orders Changed After Original Agreement",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers. Making last minute changes to product design and purchase agreements can create knock-on effects for workers who may be forced to work excessive overtime in order to deliver these changes.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1028,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 296,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Orders_Changed_After_Original_Agreement+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5949789,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Orders Paid On-time+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Orders_Paid_On_time+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Quantity of Orders Paid On-time",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers. Prompt and fair terms of payment helps suppliers with cash flow enabling them to pay workers on time and adequately. </p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Orders_Paid_On_time+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5950042,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Policy to Pay Supplier Within 60 Days+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Policy_to_Pay_Supplier_Within_60_Days+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Policy to Pay Supplier Within 60 Days",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers. Prompt and fair terms of payment helps suppliers with cash flow enabling them to pay workers on time and adequately.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Policy_to_Pay_Supplier_Within_60_Days+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5950295,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Orders with Labor Cost Protection+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Orders_with_Labor_Cost_Protection+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Quantity of Orders with Labor Cost Protection",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers. Ensuring that adequate labour costs are factored into price negoitations is one way to ensure that the payment of living wages to workers in the supply chain is possible.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Orders_with_Labor_Cost_Protection+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5950548,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Protects Labour Costs in Price Negotiations+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Protects_Labour_Costs_in_Price_Negotiations+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Protects Labour Costs in Price Negotiations",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers. Ensuring that adequate labour costs are factored into price negoitations is one way to ensure that the payment of living wages to workers in the supply chain is possible.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1095,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 347,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Protects_Labour_Costs_in_Price_Negotiations+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5950801,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Percentage or Number of Workers Earning a Living Wage+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Percentage_or_Number_of_Workers_Earning_a_Living_Wage+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Percentage or Number of Workers Earning a Living Wage",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Disclosing wage data for workers in the supply chain demonstrates tangible outcomes of the company’s efforts to increase wages and take steps towards the payment of living wages to workers in its supply chain.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Percentage_or_Number_of_Workers_Earning_a_Living_Wage+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5951055,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Percentage of Workers Paid Above Minimum Wage+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Percentage_of_Workers_Paid_Above_Minimum_Wage+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Percentage of Workers Paid Above Minimum Wage",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Disclosing wage data for workers in the supply chain demonstrates tangible outcomes of the company’s efforts to increase wages and take steps towards the payment of living wages to workers in its supply chain.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1527,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 346,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Percentage_of_Workers_Paid_Above_Minimum_Wage+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5951308,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Living Wage Estimates Used for Benchmarking+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Living_Wage_Estimates_Used_for_Benchmarking+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Living Wage Estimates Used for Benchmarking",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>When a company discloses the living wage methodology it uses to benchmark the wage rates that workers are paid in its supply chain, it allows stakeholders to scrutinise the credibility of the company's approach.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1482,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 301,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Living_Wage_Estimates_Used_for_Benchmarking+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5951561,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress toward the payment of a Living Wage to workers in the supply chain+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_toward_the_payment_of_a_Living_Wage_to_workers_in_the_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress toward the payment of a Living Wage to workers in the supply chain",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The majority of garment workers around the world are paid below a living wage rate. A wage increase is an urgent matter for supply chain workers enabling them to support themselves and their families. When a company reports annually on progress towards the payment of living wages to workers in its supply chain, it gives stakeholders an indication of the outcomes of a company's efforts to increase workers' wages.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1527,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 346,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_toward_the_payment_of_a_Living_Wage_to_workers_in_the_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5951816,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Strategy to Achieving Living Wage+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Strategy_to_Achieving_Living_Wage+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Strategy to Achieving Living Wage",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The majority of garment workers around the world are paid below a living wage rate. A wage increase is an urgent matter for supply chain workers enabling them to support themselves and their families. When a company discloses a time-bound commitment to paying living wages for all workers within its supply chain then it shows that it plans to take urgent and active steps towards increasing wages for workers.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1554,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 348,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Strategy_to_Achieving_Living_Wage+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5952070,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Approach to Living Wage+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Approach_to_Living_Wage+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Approach to Living Wage",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The majority of garment workers around the world are paid below a living wage rate. When a company discloses information about its approach towards achieving the payment of living wages to workers in the supply chain, it demonstrates that the company considers this issue important.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1554,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 348,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Approach_to_Living_Wage+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5952325,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Data on Modern Slavery Prevalence+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Data_on_Modern_Slavery_Prevalence+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Data on Modern Slavery Prevalence",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>When a company discloses data on the prevalence of modern slavery related violations identified in its supply chain, such as when workers pay recruitment fees or their passports are withheld, it demonstrates that the company is taking steps to identify, address, prevent or remedy the prevalence of modern slavery.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 795,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 313,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Tackling_Modern_Slavery_Score_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Tackling_Modern_Slavery_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Tackling_Modern_Slavery_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Data_on_Modern_Slavery_Prevalence+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5952578,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Conducts Worker Interviews on Recruitment Process+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Conducts_Worker_Interviews_on_Recruitment_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Conducts Worker Interviews on Recruitment Process",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>A major cause of forced labour in today’s global supply chains is the charging of recruitment fees to migrant workers. Such payments can create situations of debt bondage and leave low-wage workers vulnerable to human trafficking and further exploitation. Interviews with workers specifically about their recruitment journey can help a company detect indicators of modern slavery related violations.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 295,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Tackling_Modern_Slavery_Score_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Tackling_Modern_Slavery_Score_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Conducts_Worker_Interviews_on_Recruitment_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5952831,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Supplier's Recruitment Agencies+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supplier_s_Recruitment_Agencies+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Supplier's Recruitment Agencies",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>A major cause of forced labour in today’s global supply chains is the charging of recruitment fees to migrant workers. Such payments can create situations of debt bondage and leave low-wage workers vulnerable to human trafficking and further exploitation. When a company discloses information about its approach to recruitment fees being paid by workers in the supply chain it demonstrates that the company is taking steps to address and mitigate the prevalence of modern slavery.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Tackling_Modern_Slavery_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supplier_s_Recruitment_Agencies+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5953084,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Approach to Recruitment Fees+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Approach_to_Recruitment_Fees+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Approach to Recruitment Fees",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>A major cause of forced labour in today’s global supply chains is the charging of recruitment fees to migrant workers. Such payments can create situations of debt bondage and leave low-wage workers vulnerable to human trafficking and further exploitation. When a company discloses information about its approach to recruitment fees being paid by workers in the supply chain it demonstrates that the company is taking steps to address and mitigate the prevalence of modern slavery.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 795,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 313,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Tackling_Modern_Slavery_Score_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Tackling_Modern_Slavery_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Tackling_Modern_Slavery_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Approach_to_Recruitment_Fees+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5953337,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Offers Repair Services+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Offers_Repair_Services+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Offers Repair Services",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Clothing repair services help customers to extend the life of their garments and enables materials to stay in circulation for longer, which reduces the overall environmental impact of a garment throughout its lifecycle.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Consumption.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Offers_Repair_Services+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5953588,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Offers Take-back Schemes+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Offers_Take_back_Schemes+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Offers Take-back Schemes",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Take-back clothing and textile recycling schemes encourage consumers to recycle their old garments rather throwing them into landfill. These schemes can help prolong the life of garments, enable clothing to be resold or reused and help facilitate textile-to-textile recycling.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Consumption.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Offers_Take_back_Schemes+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5953840,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress On Reducing Pre-Consumer Waste+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_On_Reducing_Pre_Consumer_Waste+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress On Reducing Pre-Consumer Waste",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Around one quarter of the industry’s resources are wasted as leftovers of textile and garment production every year. This is why it is useful to understand what progress a company is making to reduce pre-consumer waste.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_On_Reducing_Pre_Consumer_Waste+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5954093,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Reducing Pre-Consumer Waste Strategy+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reducing_Pre_Consumer_Waste_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Reducing Pre-Consumer Waste Strategy",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Around one quarter of the industry’s resources are wasted as leftovers of textile and garment production every year. This is why it is useful for understanding what a company is doing to reduce pre-consumer waste.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reducing_Pre_Consumer_Waste_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5954346,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Products Destroyed+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Products_Destroyed+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Quantity of Products Destroyed",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Publishing data on textile/product incineration shows that a company is taking steps to measure and understand its approach to responsible waste management. It also enables external stakeholders to hold companies to account for incinerating perfectly good materials and products.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Consumption.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Products_Destroyed+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5954599,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Product / Textile Waste Generated During The Annual Reporting Period+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Product_Textile_Waste_Generated_During_The_Annual_Reporting_Period+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Product / Textile Waste Generated During The Annual Reporting Period",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Publishing data on the volume of textile/product waste generated annually demonstrates that a company is taking steps to measure and understand its approach to waste management.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Product_Textile_Waste_Generated_During_The_Annual_Reporting_Period+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5954852,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Products Produced+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Products_Produced+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Quantity of Products Produced",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Publishing data on textile/product incineration shows that a company is taking steps to measure and understand its approach to responsible waste management. It also enables external stakeholders to hold companies to account for incinerating perfectly good materials and products.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1523,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 342,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Consumption.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_2023.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Overconsumption_Materials.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Overproduction.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Products_Produced+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5955105,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress to Eliminate Hazardous Chemicals+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_to_Eliminate_Hazardous_Chemicals+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress to Eliminate Hazardous Chemicals",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Many hazardous chemicals are used to treat, finish, dye and launder materials used in fashion. This disclosure indicates that a company making progress on its systemic and measurable approach towards reducing the hazardous chemicals used in its products.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Composition.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_5_Water_Chemicals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_to_Eliminate_Hazardous_Chemicals+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5955358,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Commitment to Eliminate Hazardous Chemicals+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Commitment_to_Eliminate_Hazardous_Chemicals+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Commitment to Eliminate Hazardous Chemicals",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Many hazardous chemicals are used to treat, finish, dye and launder materials used in fashion. This disclosure indicates that a company is taking a systemic and measurable approach to reducing the hazardous chemicals used in its products.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Composition.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_5_Water_Chemicals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Commitment_to_Eliminate_Hazardous_Chemicals+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5955611,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses % of Circular Products+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_of_Circular_Products+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses % of Circular Products",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Disclosing the percentage of products designed to enable textile-textile recycling indicates a company’s progress on moving towards more circular systems of production.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Composition.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_of_Circular_Products+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5955864,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Evidence of Developing Circular Solutions+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Evidence_of_Developing_Circular_Solutions+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Evidence of Developing Circular Solutions",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The aim of textile-to-textile recycling is that eventually the fibres and textiles used in clothing will be able to be used repeatedly and for much longer, dramatically reducing the need to create new clothes from virgin resources. This is why it is useful to understand what companies are doing to invest in the development of these technologies and move towards a more circular system of production.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Composition.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Evidence_of_Developing_Circular_Solutions+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5956117,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Minimizing Impact of Microfibres+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Minimizing_Impact_of_Microfibres+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Minimizing Impact of Microfibres",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Textiles are now the largest source of global primary microplastic pollution and have even been detected in the deepest parts of the ocean. This is why it is useful to understand what companies are doing to address and minimise the impact of microfibres on the environment, oceans, marine animals and our health. </p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Composition.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Sustainable_Sourcing_Materials.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Minimizing_Impact_of_Microfibres+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5956370,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress to Reducing Virgin Plastics+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_to_Reducing_Virgin_Plastics+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress to Reducing Virgin Plastics",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Disclosing data on a company's progress towards reducing the use of virgin plastics shows that the company is taking active steps minimise the environmental impacts of the materials and packaging the company uses.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Composition.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Sustainable_Sourcing_Materials.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_to_Reducing_Virgin_Plastics+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5956623,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Targets to Reduce Virgin Plastics+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Targets_to_Reduce_Virgin_Plastics+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Targets to Reduce Virgin Plastics",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Disclosing a strategy to reduce the use of virgin plastics shows that the company acknowledges that moving away from virgin plastics is necessary to minimise the environmental impacts of the materials and packaging the company uses.</p>\r<br>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Composition.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Sustainable_Sourcing_Materials.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Targets_to_Reduce_Virgin_Plastics+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5956876,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress on Sustainable Materials Strategy+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Sustainable_Materials_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress on Sustainable Materials Strategy",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This disclosure demonstrates a company's measurable progress towards switching to the use of more sustainable materials and enables the company and its stakeholders to track progress over time. This disclosure can also highlight challenges and opportunities related to sourcing different sustainable materials.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1323,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Composition.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Sustainable_Sourcing_Materials.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Overconsumption_Materials.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Sustainable_Materials_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5957129,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Sustainable Materials Strategy+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Sustainable_Materials_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Sustainable Materials Strategy",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This disclosure indicates that a company is taking a systemic and measurable approach to the integration of more sustainable materials in its products and collections.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1323,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Composition.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Sustainable_Sourcing_Materials.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Overconsumption_Materials.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Sustainable_Materials_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5957382,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Water Use+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Water_Use+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Water Use",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Measuring and publishing water usage data shows that a company is taking steps to understand and reduce its water footprint across its operations and supply chain. </p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Owned and operated facilities\":\"3.333333333333333\",\"Manufacturing and processing facilities\":\"3.333333333333333\",\"Raw material level\":\"3.333333333333333\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Climate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Water_Use+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5957635,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Renewable Energy Use+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Renewable_Energy_Use+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Renewable Energy Use",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Measuring and publishing renewable energy data shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Owned and operated facilities\":\"5\",\"Supply chain\":\"5\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Climate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Renewable_Energy_Use+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5957888,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Carbon Emissions+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Emissions+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Carbon Emissions",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Measuring and publishing carbon emissions data shows that a company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Owned and operated facilities\":\"5\",\"Supply chain\":\"5\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Climate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Emissions+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5958141,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Zero Deforestation Commitment+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Zero_Deforestation_Commitment+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Zero Deforestation Commitment",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Limiting deforestation is a crucial part of mitigating global carbon emissions. A zero-deforestation commitment shows that the company is working to minimise its use of fibres derived from ancient and endangered forests and forested areas that have been cleared or converted.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Climate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Zero_Deforestation_Commitment+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5958394,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Science Based Targets+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Science_Based_Targets+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Science Based Targets",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Setting Science-Based Targets shows that a company is committed to reducing its carbon emissions in line with the Paris Agreement.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1323,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Climate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2023.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Science_Based_Targets+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5958647,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Environmental Profit and Loss Statement+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Environmental_Profit_and_Loss_Statement+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Environmental Profit and Loss Statement",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This disclosure indicates that a company is taking steps to integrate environmental impacts, including its business operations and its supply chain, into its profit motive and financial decision making processes.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Climate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Environmental_Profit_and_Loss_Statement+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5958900,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.5 Verified Sustainability Report+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_5_Verified_Sustainability_Report+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.5 Verified Sustainability Report",
      "question": "<p>What score did the company achieve for 1.5 Verified Sustainability Report in the Fashion Transparency Index?</p>",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Verified sustainability reporting assures the quality and credibility of the information.
</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Policy_Commitments_Score_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Policy_Commitments_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_5_Verified_Sustainability_Report+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5959154,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Reports on Efforts to Improve Environmental Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reports_on_Efforts_to_Improve_Environmental_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Reports on Efforts to Improve Environmental Impacts",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">It is important for a brand to publish a strategic plan, targets or goals in order to drive improvements in their human rights and environmental impact. When brands publish their progress towards achieving human rights and environmental goals, it allows citizens to understand more about brands and how they can hold the brands to account to their goals.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_5_Strategic_Plan_for_Improving_Impacts.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_4_Identification_of_Impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reports_on_Efforts_to_Improve_Environmental_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5959406,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Reports on Efforts to Improve Human Rights Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reports_on_Efforts_to_Improve_Human_Rights_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Reports on Efforts to Improve Human Rights Impacts",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">It is important for a brand to publish a strategic plan, targets or goals in order to drive improvements in their human rights and environmental impact. When brands publish their progress towards achieving human rights and environmental goals, it allows citizens to understand more about brands and how they can hold the brands to account to their goals.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_5_Strategic_Plan_for_Improving_Impacts.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_4_Identification_of_Impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reports_on_Efforts_to_Improve_Human_Rights_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5959659,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Plan for Improving Human Rights Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Plan_for_Improving_Human_Rights_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Plan for Improving Human Rights Impacts",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">It is important for a brand to publish a strategic plan, targets or goals in order to drive improvements in their human rights and environmental impact. When brands publish their progress towards achieving human rights and environmental goals, it allows citizens to understand more about brands and how they can hold the brands to account to their goals.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_5_Strategic_Plan_for_Improving_Impacts.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_4_Identification_of_Impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Plan_for_Improving_Human_Rights_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5959912,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Plan for Improving Environmental Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Plan_for_Improving_Environmental_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Plan for Improving Environmental Impacts",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">It is important for a brand to publish a strategic plan, targets or goals in order to drive improvements in their human rights and environmental impact. When brands publish their progress towards achieving human rights and environmental goals, it allows citizens to understand more about brands and how they can hold the brands to account to their goals.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_5_Strategic_Plan_for_Improving_Impacts.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_4_Identification_of_Impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Plan_for_Improving_Environmental_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5960165,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Material Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Material_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Material Impacts",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>A materiality assessment discloses how the company identifies its most material human rights and environmental impacts. </p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_4_Identification_of_Impacts_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Material_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5960418,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Describes Process to Identify Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Process_to_Identify_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Describes Process to Identify Impacts",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">A materiality assessment discloses how the company identifies its most material human rights and environmental impacts.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_4_Identification_of_Impacts_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Process_to_Identify_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5960671,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.3 Management Procedures+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Management_Procedures+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.3 Management Procedures",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 1.3 Management Procedures in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>These management procedures identify how the company is putting its policies into action. It is important for a company to have procedures that apply to their suppliers and own employees. This shows that they are working to uphold their commitments to human rights, social impacts and environmental protection and that the company takes some steps to improve practises across the company and/or the supply chain.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Animal Welfare\":\"0.357\",\"Annual Leave & Public Holidays\":\"0.357\",\"Anti-bribery Corruption & Presentation of False Information\":\"0.357\",\"Biodiversity & Conservation\":\"0.357\",\"Child Labour\":\"0.357\",\"Community Engagement\":\"0.357\",\"Contracts & Terms of Employment\":\"0.357\",\"Discrimination\":\"0.357\",\"Diversity & Inclusion\":\"0.357\",\"Energy & Carbon Emissions\":\"0.357\",\"Equal Pay\":\"0.357\",\"Forced & Bonded Labour\":\"0.357\",\"Foreign & Migrant Labour\":\"0.357\",\"Freedom of Association Right to Organise & Collective Bargaining\":\"0.357\",\"Harassment & Violence\":\"0.357\",\"Health & Safety\":\"0.357\",\"Living Conditions/Dormitories\":\"0.357\",\"Maternity Rights & Parental Leave\":\"0.357\",\"Notice Period Dismissal & Disciplinary Action\":\"0.357\",\"Overtime Pay\":\"0.357\",\"Restricted Substance List\":\"0.357\",\"Sub-contracting Outsourcing & Homeworkers\":\"0.357\",\"Wages & Financial Benefits (e.g. bonuses/insurance/social security/pensions)\":\"0.357\",\"Waste & Recycling (Packaging/Office/Facility/Retail)\":\"0.357\",\"Waste & Recycling (Product/Textiles)\":\"0.357\",\"Water Effluents & Treatment\":\"0.357\",\"Water Usage & Footprint\":\"0.357\",\"Working Hours & Rest Breaks\":\"0.357\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Policy_Commitments_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Management_Procedures+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5960924,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Supply Chain Policies in Local Language+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies_in_Local_Language+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Supply Chain Policies in Local Language",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Publishing translations of supplier policies/code of conduct in the local languages of the production/sourcing vendors ensures supplier teams and workers are able to fully understand the requirements and can allow workers to better understand their workplace rights. </p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Supply_Chain_Policies_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Supply_Chain_Policies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies_in_Local_Language+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5961177,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Supply Chain Policies Are Contractual+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies_Are_Contractual+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Supply Chain Policies Are Contractual",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Requiring a signature on supplier policies or explicitly ensuring that adherence to suppliers policies is part of the contractual trading agreement reinforces the importance of compliance and demonstrates that the company is serious about suppliers' performance on social and environmental issues. </p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1072,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Supply_Chain_Policies_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Supply_Chain_Policies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies_Are_Contractual+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5961430,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Supply Chain Policies Align with International Standards+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies_Align_with_International_Standards+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Supply Chain Policies Align with International Standards",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Designing policies on credible international standards shows a company’s willingness to align with credible international benchmarks and work collaboratively.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Supply_Chain_Policies_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Supply_Chain_Policies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies_Align_with_International_Standards+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5961683,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Supply Chain Policies+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Supply Chain Policies",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Policies outline the minimum human rights and environmental standards that companies require their vendors and partners to implement throughout the supply chain. Having supplier policies in place shows that the company takes some responsibility for the practises that happen within its supply chain.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Annual Leave & Public Holidays\":\"0.4\",\"Anti-bribery Corruption & Presentation of False Information\":\"0.4\",\"Biodiversity & Conservation\":\"0.4\",\"Child Labour\":\"0.4\",\"Community Engagement\":\"0.4\",\"Contracts & Terms of Employment\":\"0.4\",\"Discrimination\":\"0.4\",\"Energy & Carbon Emissions\":\"0.4\",\"Equal Pay\":\"0.4\",\"Forced & Bonded Labour\":\"0.4\",\"Foreign & Migrant Labour\":\"0.4\",\"Freedom of Association Right to Organise & Collective Bargaining\":\"0.4\",\"Harassment & Violence\":\"0.4\",\"Health & Safety\":\"0.4\",\"Living Conditions/Dormitories\":\"0.4\",\"Maternity Rights & Parental Leave\":\"0.4\",\"Notice Period Dismissal & Disciplinary Action\":\"0.4\",\"Overtime Pay\":\"0.4\",\"Sub-contracting Outsourcing & Homeworkers\":\"0.4\",\"Wages & Financial Benefits (e.g. bonuses/insurance/social security/pensions)\":\"0.4\",\"Waste & Recycling (Packaging/Office/Facility)\":\"0.4\",\"Waste & Recycling (Product/Textiles)\":\"0.4\",\"Water Effluents & Treatment\":\"0.4\",\"Water Usage & Footprint\":\"0.4\",\"Working Hours & Rest Breaks\":\"0.4\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Supply_Chain_Policies_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5961936,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.1 Own Operations Policies+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_1_Own_Operations_Policies+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.1 Own Operations Policies",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 1.1 Own Operations Policies in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">These policies evidence the company's operating guidelines and outline the standards that must be implemented across the company's activities. Policies are a way for a company to communicate its commitments to human rights, social impacts and environmental protection. If they have policies in place we know they are considering these topics within their business.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Animal Welfare\":\"0.476\",\"Annual Leave & Public Holidays\":\"0.476\",\"Anti-bribery Corruption & Presentation of False Information\":\"0.476\",\"Biodiversity & Conservation\":\"0.476\",\"Community Engagement\":\"0.476\",\"Contracts & Terms of Employment\":\"0.476\",\"Discrimination\":\"0.476\",\"Diversity & Inclusion\":\"0.476\",\"Energy & Carbon Emissions\":\"0.476\",\"Equal Pay\":\"0.476\",\"Freedom of Association Right to Organise & Collective Bargaining\":\"0.476\",\"Harassment & Violence\":\"0.476\",\"Health & Safety\":\"0.476\",\"Maternity Rights & Parental Leave\":\"0.476\",\"Notice Period Dismissal & Disciplinary Action\":\"0.476\",\"Restricted Substance List\":\"0.476\",\"Wages & Financial Benefits (e.g. bonuses/insurance/social security/pensions)\":\"0.476\",\"Waste & Recycling (Packaging/Office/Retail)\":\"0.476\",\"Waste & Recycling (Product/Textiles)\":\"0.476\",\"Water Usage & Footprint\":\"0.476\",\"Working Hours & Rest Breaks\":\"0.476\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Policy_Commitments_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_1_Own_Operations_Policies+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5962188,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Supplier Incentives to Improve Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supplier_Incentives_to_Improve_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Supplier Incentives to Improve Impacts",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Incentivising staff beyond the CSR/Sustainability team such as sourcing, production, buying and design to contribute towards improving social and environmental impacts ensures there is accountability for those within the company whose decision making has an influence. While incentivising suppliers to improve social and environmental performance can be accomplished through guaranteeing longer contracts, increased order size, price premiums and fewer audits can motivate suppliers to improve and drive changes in their own operations and throughout their supply chain.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Incorporation_of_Human_Rights_Environmental_Performance_in_Purchasing_Practices.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_4_Incorporation_of_Human_Rights_Environmental_Performance_in_Purchasing_Practices.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supplier_Incentives_to_Improve_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5962441,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Executive Incentives to Improve Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Executive_Incentives_to_Improve_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Executive Incentives to Improve Impacts",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Incentivising staff beyond the CSR/Sustainability team such as sourcing, production, buying and design to contribute towards improving social and environmental impacts ensures there is accountability for those within the company whose decision making has an influence. While incentivising suppliers to improve social and environmental performance can be accomplished through guaranteeing longer contracts, increased order size, price premiums and fewer audits can motivate suppliers to improve and drive changes in their own operations and throughout their supply chain.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Incorporation_of_Human_Rights_Environmental_Performance_in_Purchasing_Practices.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_4_Incorporation_of_Human_Rights_Environmental_Performance_in_Purchasing_Practices.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Executive_Incentives_to_Improve_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5962694,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Employee Incentives to Improve Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Employee_Incentives_to_Improve_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Employee Incentives to Improve Impacts",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Incentivising staff beyond the CSR/Sustainability team such as sourcing, production, buying and design to contribute towards improving social and environmental impacts ensures there is accountability for those within the company whose decision making has an influence. While incentivising suppliers to improve social and environmental performance can be accomplished through guaranteeing longer contracts, increased order size, price premiums and fewer audits can motivate suppliers to improve and drive changes in their own operations and throughout their supply chain.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Incorporation_of_Human_Rights_Environmental_Performance_in_Purchasing_Practices.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_4_Incorporation_of_Human_Rights_Environmental_Performance_in_Purchasing_Practices.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Employee_Incentives_to_Improve_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5962947,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Implementation of Board Level Accountability Described+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Implementation_of_Board_Level_Accountability_Described+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Implementation of Board Level Accountability Described",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>When a brand discloses how board level accountability is implemented within the company it provides an indication of the significance placed on addressing these issues within the company.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1072,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Board_Accountability_for_Human_Rights_Environmental_Issues_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Board_Accountability_for_Human_Rights_Environmental_Issues.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Implementation_of_Board_Level_Accountability_Described+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5963200,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Accountable Board Member Identified+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Accountable_Board_Member_Identified+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Accountable Board Member Identified",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>When a brand discloses the board member responsible for overseeing social and environmental performance within the company it provides an indication of the significance placed on addressing these issues within the company.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1072,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Board_Accountability_for_Human_Rights_Environmental_Issues_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Board_Accountability_for_Human_Rights_Environmental_Issues.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Accountable_Board_Member_Identified+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5963453,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2.1 Identifies Lead Responsibility for Human Rights & Environmental Issues+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Identifies_Lead_Responsibility_for_Human_Rights_Environmental_Issues+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2.1 Identifies Lead Responsibility for Human Rights & Environmental Issues",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 2.1 Identifies Lead Responsibility for Human Rights & Environmental Issues in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>When brands publish contact details for their sustainability team this demonstrates that they are open to dialogue between the brand and its customers and stakeholders.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Discloses direct contact details for relevant department\":\"5\",\"Discloses name and direct contact details of the relevant person\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Governance_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Identifies_Lead_Responsibility_for_Human_Rights_Environmental_Issues+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5963706,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3.3 Raw Materials Suppliers Disclosure+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_3_Raw_Materials_Suppliers_Disclosure+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3.3 Raw Materials Suppliers Disclosure",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 3.3 Raw Materials Suppliers Disclosure in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Disclosing raw material suppliers shows that a brand is working to trace its whole supply chain and takes some responsibility for its direct and indirect sourcing relationships.  It can help facilitate the identification and escalation of labour rights and environmental issues by trade unions, NGOs and other stakeholders directly to brands enabling them to take urgent actions to address and remediate issues raised. This is especially important beyond the first tier where brands may not be able to monitor their suppliers as easily.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Name of Supplier (e.g. facility or farm)\":\"1.667\",\"Address\":\"1.667\",\"Type of raw material products or services\":\"1.667\",\"Approximate number of workers\":\"1.667\",\"Sex-disaggregated breakdown of workers\":\"0.834\",\"% or number of migrant or contract workers\":\"0.417\",\"List is publicly available as a csv or Excel spreadsheet\":\"0.417\",\"Discloses what percentage of raw materials suppliers is published\":\"0.417\",\"Discloses 95% or higher of raw materials suppliers are included in the list/map\":\"0.417\",\"Publishes that this list or map of raw materials suppliers has been updated within the past 12 months\":\"0.417\",\"Discloses whether the company is tracing the source/supplier of one or more specific raw materials\":\"0.417\",\"Nothing\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_3_Raw_Materials_Suppliers_Disclosure+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5963958,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3.2 Processing Facilities Disclosure+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_2_Processing_Facilities_Disclosure+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3.2 Processing Facilities Disclosure",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 3.2 Processing Facilities Disclosure in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Disclosing a list of suppliers beyond the first tier shows that a brand is working to map deeper levels of their supply chain and takes some responsibility for its direct and indirect sourcing relationships. It can help facilitate the identification and escalation of labour rights and environmental issues by trade unions, NGOs and other stakeholders directly to brands enabling them to take urgent actions to address and remediate issues raised. This is especially important beyond the first tier where brands may not be able to monitor their suppliers as easily.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Name of Facility\":\"1.429\",\"Address\":\"1.429\",\"Type of products or services\":\"1.429\",\"Approximate number of workers at each site\":\"1.429\",\"Sex-disaggregated breakdown of workers\":\"0.714\",\"If facility has trade union\":\"0.714\",\"If the facility has an independent worker committee\":\"0.357\",\"% or number of migrant or contract workers\":\"0.357\",\"Name of Parent Company (for each facility if applicable)\":\"0.357\",\"Discloses which tier one facility (or facilities) this processing facility works with\":\"0.357\",\"List is publicly available as a csv or Excel spreadsheet\":\"0.357\",\"Discloses what percentage of processing facilities is published\":\"0.357\",\"Discloses 95% or higher of processing facilities are included in the list/map\":\"0.357\",\"Publishes that this list or map of processing facilities has been updated within the past 6 months\":\"0.357\",\"Nothing\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_2_Processing_Facilities_Disclosure+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5964211,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Exit Strategy+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Exit_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Exit Strategy",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>We are looking to see if the company has a responsible exit strategy in place when ending supplier relationships rather than cutting and running. We are looking to see if a company explains how they address and manage potential adverse impacts and risks to supply chain workers during the process.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4A_Fix_Remediation_Process_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4A_Fix_Remediation_Process.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Exit_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5964464,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Affected Stakeholder Engagement in Remediation+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Affected_Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Remediation+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Affected Stakeholder Engagement in Remediation",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Including affected stakeholders, such as workers, farmers and trade unions, in the remediation process demonstrates that companies are seeking to design outcomes that will benefit the people it is intended to.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4A_Fix_Remediation_Process_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4A_Fix_Remediation_Process.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Affected_Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Remediation+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5964717,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Remediation Process+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Remediation_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Remediation Process",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Disclosing a company’s processes for remediation implies that the company is taking action to remedy human rights and environmental issues happening within their supply chain.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4A_Fix_Remediation_Process_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4A_Fix_Remediation_Process.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Remediation_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5964970,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Remediation Plan and Status by Named Facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Remediation_Plan_and_Status_by_Named_Facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Remediation Plan and Status by Named Facilities",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>When companies disclose remediation plans and status by named facilities it shows a clear commitment to transparency from brands and can drive improvements in supplier compliance. It also provides stakeholders with useful information that can enable labour and environmental issues to be resolved quickly and collaboratively.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"At tier 1 level\":\"3.3333\",\"Beyond tier 1\":\"3.3333\",\"Raw material level\":\"3.3333\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_B_Fix_Remediation_Status.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Remediation_Plan_and_Status_by_Named_Facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5965223,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Summary of Remediation Plans and Status+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Summary_of_Remediation_Plans_and_Status+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Summary of Remediation Plans and Status",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>When companies disclose an aggregated breakdown of suppliers' remediation plans and status it can give an indication of the overall compliance trends within their supply chain and can allow stakeholders to track progress over time.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"At tier 1 level\":\"3.333\",\"Beyond tier 1\":\"3.333\",\"Raw material level\":\"3.333\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_B_Fix_Remediation_Status.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Summary_of_Remediation_Plans_and_Status+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5965476,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Mechanism - Direct Employees+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Direct_Employees+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism - Direct Employees",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Grievance mechanisms or whistleblowing channels allow direct employees in the company to report any human rights or environmental issues to upper management so that action can be taken to address issues raised.<span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 8pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\"><br></span></span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievances_Employees.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_B_Fix_Grievance_Management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Direct_Employees+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5965729,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Mechanism Implementation - Direct Employees+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Implementation_Direct_Employees+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism Implementation - Direct Employees",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Grievance mechanisms or whistleblowing channels allow direct employees in the company to report any human rights or environmental issues to upper management so that action can be taken to address issues raised.<span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 8pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\"><br></span></span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 573,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievances_Employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Implementation_Direct_Employees+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5965982,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Reporting - Direct Employees+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Reporting_Direct_Employees+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Grievance Reporting - Direct Employees",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Grievance mechanisms or whistleblowing channels allow direct employees in the company to report any human rights or environmental issues to upper management so that action can be taken to address issues raised. Disclosing data findings demonstrates that a company is taking active steps to implement this grievance mechanism and resolve any grievances filed.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 573,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievances_Employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Reporting_Direct_Employees+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5966235,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Mechanism - Supply Chain Workers+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Supply_Chain_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism - Supply Chain Workers",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Confidential grievance mechanisms or whistleblowing channels enable workers in the supply chain to report any human rights or environmental issues directly to the company so that action can be taken to address issues raised.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1072,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievances_Supply_Chain_Workers_and_Suppliers.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_B_Fix_Grievance_Management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Supply_Chain_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5966488,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Mechanism Implementation - Supply Chain Workers+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Implementation_Supply_Chain_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism Implementation - Supply Chain Workers",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Confidential grievance mechanisms or whistleblowing channels enable workers in the supply chain to report any human rights or environmental issues directly to the company so that action can be taken to address issues raised.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievances_Supply_Chain_Workers_and_Suppliers.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_B_Fix_Grievance_Management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Implementation_Supply_Chain_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5966741,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Mechanism Disseminated to Supply Chain Workers+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Disseminated_to_Supply_Chain_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism Disseminated to Supply Chain Workers",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Confidential grievance mechanisms or whistleblowing channels enable workers in the supply chain to report any human rights or environmental issues directly to the company so that action can be taken to address issues raised.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievances_Supply_Chain_Workers_and_Suppliers.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_B_Fix_Grievance_Management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_Disseminated_to_Supply_Chain_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5966994,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Mechanism in Supplier Policies+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_in_Supplier_Policies+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism in Supplier Policies",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Confidential grievance mechanisms or whistleblowing channels enable workers in the supply chain to report any human rights or environmental issues directly to the company so that action can be taken to address issues raised.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1072,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievances_Supply_Chain_Workers_and_Suppliers.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_B_Fix_Grievance_Management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Mechanism_in_Supplier_Policies+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5967247,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Grievance Reporting - Supply Chain Workers+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Reporting_Supply_Chain_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Grievance Reporting - Supply Chain Workers",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Confidential grievance mechanisms or whistleblowing channels enable workers in the supply chain to report any human rights or environmental issues directly to the company so that action can be taken to address issues raised. Disclosing data findings demonstrates that a company is taking active steps to implement this grievance mechanism and resolve any grievances filed.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievances_Supply_Chain_Workers_and_Suppliers.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_B_Fix_Grievance_Management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievance_Reporting_Supply_Chain_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5967500,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Full Audit Reports by Named Facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Full_Audit_Reports_by_Named_Facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Full Audit Reports by Named Facilities",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Publishing full audit results for specific named facilities shows a clear commitment to transparency from brands and can drive improvements in supplier compliance. It also provides stakeholders with useful information that can enable labour and environmental issues to be resolved quickly and collaboratively. It also allows stakeholders to report inaccuracies or discrepancies between the audit findings and workers' actual experience in the workplace or other evidence.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"At tier 1 level\":\"3.333\",\"Beyond tier 1\":\"3.333\",\"Raw material level\":\"3.333\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_3_Show_Facility_Assessments_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_3_Show_Facility_Assessments.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_3_Show_Facility_Assessments_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Full_Audit_Reports_by_Named_Facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5967753,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Selected Audit Findings by Named Facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Selected_Audit_Findings_by_Named_Facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Selected Audit Findings by Named Facilities",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Publishing audit results for specific named facilities shows a clear commitment to transparency from brands and can drive improvements in supplier compliance. It also provides stakeholders with useful information that can enable labour and environmental issues to be resolved quickly and collaboratively.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"At tier 1 level\":\"3.333\",\"Beyond tier 1\":\"3.333\",\"Raw material level\":\"3.333\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_3_Show_Facility_Assessments_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_3_Show_Facility_Assessments.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_3_Show_Facility_Assessments_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Selected_Audit_Findings_by_Named_Facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5968006,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Ratings by Named Facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Ratings_by_Named_Facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Ratings by Named Facilities",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Publishing facility-level ratings for named suppliers provides tangible evidence of a supplier’s compliance level and can help drive improvements in supplier compliance over time. It also provides stakeholders with useful information that can enable labour and environmental issues to be resolved quickly and collaboratively.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"At tier 1 level\":\"3.333\",\"Beyond tier 1\":\"3.333\",\"Raw material level\":\"3.333\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_3_Show_Facility_Assessments_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_3_Show_Facility_Assessments.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_3_Show_Facility_Assessments_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Ratings_by_Named_Facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5968259,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Summary of Assessment Findings+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Summary_of_Assessment_Findings+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Summary of Assessment Findings",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Publishing audit results can drive improvements in supplier compliance and provide stakeholders with useful information that can enable labour and environmental issues to be resolved quickly and collaboratively.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"At tier 1 level\":\"3.333\",\"Beyond tier 1\":\"3.333\",\"Raw material level\":\"3.333\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_3_Show_Facility_Assessments_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_3_Show_Facility_Assessments.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_3_Show_Facility_Assessments_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Summary_of_Assessment_Findings+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5968512,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Facility Level Assessment Description+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Facility_Level_Assessment_Description+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Facility Level Assessment Description",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 572,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Facility_Level_Assessment_Description+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5968765,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Number or % of off-site worker interviews+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Number_or_of_off_site_worker_interviews+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Number or % of off-site worker interviews",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Number_or_of_off_site_worker_interviews+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5969053,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Facility Assessments Beyond Tier 1+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Facility_Assessments_Beyond_Tier_1+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Facility Assessments Beyond Tier 1",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Facility_Assessments_Beyond_Tier_1+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5969341,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Percentage of Facility Assessments Disclosed+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Facility_Assessments_Disclosed+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Percentage of Facility Assessments Disclosed",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 573,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Facility_Assessments_Disclosed+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5969594,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Assessment Frequency Disclosed+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Assessment_Frequency_Disclosed+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Assessment Frequency Disclosed",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Assessment_Frequency_Disclosed+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5969847,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+New Production Facility Criteria+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+New_Production_Facility_Criteria+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "New Production Facility Criteria",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1072,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+New_Production_Facility_Criteria+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5970100,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Third-party Audit Standards Disclosed+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Third_party_Audit_Standards_Disclosed+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Third-party Audit Standards Disclosed",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Third_party_Audit_Standards_Disclosed+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5970357,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Off-site Worker Interviews+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Off_site_Worker_Interviews+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Off-site Worker Interviews",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Off_site_Worker_Interviews+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5970609,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Risk Prevention and Remediation Outcomes Published+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Risk_Prevention_and_Remediation_Outcomes_Published+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Risk Prevention and Remediation Outcomes Published",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts. </p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 573,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1_Know_Show_Fix_Due_Diligence.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1_Know_Show_Fix_Due_Diligence_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Risk_Prevention_and_Remediation_Outcomes_Published+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5970862,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Prevention Mitigation and Remediation of Risks+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Prevention_Mitigation_and_Remediation_of_Risks+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Prevention Mitigation and Remediation of Risks",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts. </p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 573,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1_Know_Show_Fix_Due_Diligence.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1_Know_Show_Fix_Due_Diligence_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Prevention_Mitigation_and_Remediation_of_Risks+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5971115,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Risks Impacts and Violations Identified+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Risks_Impacts_and_Violations_Identified+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Risks Impacts and Violations Identified",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts. </p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 572,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1_Know_Show_Fix_Due_Diligence.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1_Know_Show_Fix_Due_Diligence_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Risks_Impacts_and_Violations_Identified+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5971368,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Stakeholder Engagement in Due Diligence+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Due_Diligence+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Stakeholder Engagement in Due Diligence",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 573,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1_Know_Show_Fix_Due_Diligence.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1_Know_Show_Fix_Due_Diligence_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Due_Diligence+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5971621,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Describes Due Diligence Process+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Due_Diligence_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Describes Due Diligence Process",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 572,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1_Know_Show_Fix_Due_Diligence.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1_Know_Show_Fix_Due_Diligence_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Due_Diligence_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5971874,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3.1 Tier One Factory Disclosure+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_1_Tier_One_Factory_Disclosure+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3.1 Tier One Factory Disclosure",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 3.1 Tier One Factory Disclosure in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Disclosing first tier supplier lists is a crucial step towards transparency for major fashion brands. It can help facilitate the identification and escalation of labour rights and environmental issues by trade unions, NGOs and other stakeholders directly to brands enabling them to take urgent actions to address and remediate issues raised.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Name of Facility\":\"1.48\",\"Address\":\"1.48\",\"Type of products or services\":\"1.48\",\"Approximate number of workers at each site\":\"1.48\",\"Sex-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site\":\"0.74\",\"If facility has trade union\":\"0.74\",\"If the facility has an independent worker committee\":\"0.37\",\"% or number of migrant or contract workers\":\"0.37\",\"Name of Parent Company (for each facility if applicable)\":\"0.37\",\"List is publicly available as a csv or Excel spreadsheet\":\"0.37\",\"Discloses what percentage of its tier one factories is published\":\"0.37\",\"Discloses 95% or higher of tier one factories are included in the list/map\":\"0.37\",\"Publishes that this list or map of tier one factories has been updated within the past 6 months\":\"0.37\",\"Nothing\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 256,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_1_Tier_One_Factory_Disclosure+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5972128,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.2 Supply Chain Policies (2020)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Supply_Chain_Policies_2020.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.2 Supply Chain Policies (2020)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 1.2 Supply Chain Policies in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Policies outline the minimum human rights and environmental standards that companies require their vendors and partners to implement throughout the supply chain. Having supplier policies in place shows that the company takes some responsibility for the practises that happen within its supply chain.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5960924",
          "weight": "6.45"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5961177",
          "weight": "6.45"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5961683",
          "weight": "80.65"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5961430",
          "weight": "6.45"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Policy_Commitments_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Supply_Chain_Policies_2020+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5972383,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Gender Equality Score (2020)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score_2020.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Gender Equality Score (2020)",
      "question": "<p>What score did the company achieve for gender equality in the Fashion Transparency Index?</p>",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5948012",
          "weight": "20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5948020",
          "weight": "20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5948273",
          "weight": "40"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5948526",
          "weight": "20"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Conditions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score_2020+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5972638,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Unionisation and Collective Bargaining Score (2020)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Unionisation_and_Collective_Bargaining_Score_2020.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Unionisation and Collective Bargaining Score (2020)",
      "question": "<p>What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?</p>",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Freedom of association and collective bargaining are fundamental labour rights enshrined within international law. When workers are able to freely join independent, democratically elected unions they are able to take collective action to negotiate with their employers for better working conditions, including wages and benefits.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5948779",
          "weight": "50.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5949032",
          "weight": "50.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Conditions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Unionisation_and_Collective_Bargaining_Score_2020+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5972893,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Purchasing Practices Score (2020)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_2020.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Purchasing Practices Score (2020)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5949285",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5949538",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5949789",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5950042",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5950295",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5950548",
          "weight": "16.67"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Conditions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_2020+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5973146,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Towards Paying Living Wages Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Towards Paying Living Wages Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>The majority of garment workers around the world are paid below a living wage rate. A wage increase is an urgent matter for supply chain workers enabling them to support themselves and their families. </p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5950801",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5951055",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5951308",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5951561",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5951816",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5952070",
          "weight": "16.67"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1028,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 296,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Conditions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5973400,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Tackling Modern Slavery Score (2020)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Tackling_Modern_Slavery_Score_2020.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Tackling Modern Slavery Score (2020)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5952325",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5952578",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5952831",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5953084",
          "weight": "25.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Conditions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Tackling_Modern_Slavery_Score_2020+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5973655,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.1 Conditions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Conditions.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.1 Conditions",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5.1 Conditions in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>According to the ILO, working conditions are at the core of decent and dignified work. Generally speaking, working conditions cover a broad range of topics and issues, from working time (hours of work, rest periods, and work schedules) to remuneration, as well as the physical conditions and mental demands that exist in the workplaces. Here, we put the spotlight on some of the more egregious, thorny, endemic or hidden working conditions issues.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5973400",
          "weight": "17.39"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5973146",
          "weight": "26.09"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5972893",
          "weight": "26.09"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5972638",
          "weight": "8.70"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5972383",
          "weight": "21.74"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Conditions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5973907,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.2 Consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Consumption.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.2 Consumption",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5.2 Consumption in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Ensuring sustainable production and consumption patterns, minimising excess, tackling textile waste and moving towards circularity.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5953337",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5953588",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5953840",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5954093",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5954346",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5954852",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5954599",
          "weight": "14.29"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5974159,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.3 Composition",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Composition.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.3 Composition",
      "question": "<p>What score did the company achieve for 5.3 Composition in the Fashion Transparency Index?</p>",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Reducing salient environmental risks through material selection, the elimination of hazardous chemicals and moving towards circularity.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5955105",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5955358",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5955611",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5955864",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5956117",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5956370",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5956623",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5956876",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5957129",
          "weight": "11.11"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Composition+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5974414,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.4 Climate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Climate.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.4 Climate",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5.4 Climate in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Taking urgent action to combat climate breakdown and working towards sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5958647",
          "weight": "10"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5958394",
          "weight": "10"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5958141",
          "weight": "10"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5957888",
          "weight": "20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5957635",
          "weight": "20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5957382",
          "weight": "30"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Climate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5974669,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5. Spotlight Issues Score (2020)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2020.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5. Spotlight Issues Score (2020)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5. Spotlight Issues in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Fashion Transparency Index 2020 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This year for the first time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5973655",
          "weight": "46.94"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5973907",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5974159",
          "weight": "18.37"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5974414",
          "weight": "20.41"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2020+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5974919,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.5 Strategic Plan for Improving Impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_5_Strategic_Plan_for_Improving_Impacts.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.5 Strategic Plan for Improving Impacts",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 1.5 Strategic Plan for Improving Impacts in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>It is important for a brand to publish a strategic plan, targets or goals in order to drive improvements in their human rights and environmental impact. When brands publish their progress towards achieving human rights and environmental goals, it allows citizens to understand more about brands and how they can hold the brands to account to their goals.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5959154",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5959406",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5959659",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5959912",
          "weight": "25.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Policy_Commitments_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_5_Strategic_Plan_for_Improving_Impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5975173,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.4 Identification of Impacts (2020)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_4_Identification_of_Impacts_2020.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.4 Identification of Impacts (2020)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 1.4 Identification of Impacts in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>A materiality assessment discloses how the company identifies its most material human rights and environmental impacts.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5960418",
          "weight": "50.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5960165",
          "weight": "50.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Policy_Commitments_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_4_Identification_of_Impacts_2020+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5975428,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1. Policy & Commitments Score (2020)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Policy_Commitments_Score_2020.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1. Policy & Commitments Score (2020)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 1. Policy & Commitments in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Fashion Transparency Index 2020 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This year for the first time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5961936",
          "weight": "22.34"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5972128",
          "weight": "32.98"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5960671",
          "weight": "29.79"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5975173",
          "weight": "4.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5974919",
          "weight": "8.51"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5958900",
          "weight": "2.13"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Policy_Commitments_Score_2020+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5975680,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2.3 Incorporation of Human Rights & Environmental Performance in Purchasing Practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Incorporation_of_Human_Rights_Environmental_Performance_in_Purchasing_Practices.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2.3 Incorporation of Human Rights & Environmental Performance in Purchasing Practices",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 2.3 Incorporation of Human Rights & Environmental Performance in Purchasing Practices in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Incentivising staff beyond the CSR/Sustainability team such as sourcing, production, buying and design to contribute towards improving social and environmental impacts ensures there is accountability for those within the company whose decision making has an influence. While incentivising suppliers to improve social and environmental performance can be accomplished through guaranteeing longer contracts, increased order size, price premiums and fewer audits can motivate suppliers to improve and drive changes in their own operations and throughout their supply chain.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5962188",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5962441",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5962694",
          "weight": "33.33"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Governance_Score_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Governance_Score_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Incorporation_of_Human_Rights_Environmental_Performance_in_Purchasing_Practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5975935,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2.2 Board Accountability for Human Rights & Environmental Issues (2020)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Board_Accountability_for_Human_Rights_Environmental_Issues_2020.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2.2 Board Accountability for Human Rights & Environmental Issues (2020)",
      "question": "<p>What score did the company achieve for 2.2 Board Accountability for Human Rights &amp; Environmental Issues in the Fashion Transparency Index?</p>",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>When a brand discloses the board member responsible for overseeing social and environmental performance within the company, and how that works in practice, it provides an indication of the significance placed on addressing these issues within the company.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5962947",
          "weight": "50.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5963200",
          "weight": "50.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Governance_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Board_Accountability_for_Human_Rights_Environmental_Issues_2020+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5976190,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2. Governance Score (2020)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Governance_Score_2020.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2. Governance Score (2020)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 2. Governance in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Fashion Transparency Index 2020 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This year for the first time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5963453",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5975935",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5975680",
          "weight": "50.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Governance_Score_2020+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5976445,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Grievances - Supply Chain Workers and Suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievances_Supply_Chain_Workers_and_Suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Grievances - Supply Chain Workers and Suppliers",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Confidential grievance mechanisms or whistleblowing channels enable workers in the supply chain to report any human rights or environmental issues directly to the company so that action can be taken to address issues raised.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5966235",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5966488",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5966741",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5966994",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5967247",
          "weight": "20.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1072,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_5_Fix_Grievance_Management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievances_Supply_Chain_Workers_and_Suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5976700,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Grievances - Employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievances_Employees.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Grievances - Employees",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Grievance mechanisms or whistleblowing channels allow direct employees in the company to report any human rights or environmental issues to upper management so that action can be taken to address issues raised.<span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 8pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\"><br></span></span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5965476",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5965729",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5965982",
          "weight": "33.33"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 573,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_5_Fix_Grievance_Management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Grievances_Employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5976955,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4.5 Fix: Grievance Management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_5_Fix_Grievance_Management.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4.5 Fix: Grievance Management",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 4.5 Fix: Grievance Management in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Fashion Transparency Index 2020 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This year for the first time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5976700",
          "weight": "37.50"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5976445",
          "weight": "62.50"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 572,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 334,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_Fix_Remediation_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_5_Fix_Grievance_Management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5977210,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4.4.B Fix: Remediation Status",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_B_Fix_Remediation_Status.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4.4.B Fix: Remediation Status",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 4.4.B Fix: Remediation Status in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Fashion Transparency Index 2020 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This year for the first time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5965223",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5964970",
          "weight": "66.67"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_Fix_Remediation_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_B_Fix_Remediation_Status+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5977465,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4.4A Fix: Remediation Process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4A_Fix_Remediation_Process.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4.4A Fix: Remediation Process",
      "question": "<p>What score did the company achieve for 4.4A Fix: Remediation Process in the Fashion Transparency Index?</p>",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Fashion Transparency Index 2020 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This year for the first time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5964717",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5964464",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5964211",
          "weight": 33.33
        }
      ],
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_Fix_Remediation_2020.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_Fix_Remediation_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4A_Fix_Remediation_Process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5977720,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4.4 Fix: Remediation (2020)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_Fix_Remediation_2020.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4.4 Fix: Remediation (2020)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 4.4 Fix: Remediation in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Fashion Transparency Index 2020 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This year for the first time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5977465",
          "weight": "25"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5977210",
          "weight": "75"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_Fix_Remediation_2020+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5977975,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4.3 Show: Facility Assessments (2020)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_3_Show_Facility_Assessments_2020.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4.3 Show: Facility Assessments (2020)",
      "question": "<p>What score did the company achieve for 4.3 Show: Facility Assessments in the Fashion Transparency Index?</p>",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Fashion Transparency Index 2020 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This year for the first time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5968259",
          "weight": "10"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5968006",
          "weight": "20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5967753",
          "weight": "30"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5967500",
          "weight": "40"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_3_Show_Facility_Assessments_2020+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5978229,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4.2 Know: Implementation of Supply Chain Policies (2020)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies_2020.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4.2 Know: Implementation of Supply Chain Policies (2020)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 4.2 Know: Implementation of Supply Chain Policies in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised. </p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5968512",
          "weight": "12.50"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5970100",
          "weight": "12.50"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5969847",
          "weight": "12.50"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5969594",
          "weight": "12.50"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5969341",
          "weight": "12.50"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5969053",
          "weight": "12.50"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5970357",
          "weight": "12.50"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5968765",
          "weight": "12.50"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies_2020+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5978483,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4.1 Know, Show & Fix: Due Diligence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1_Know_Show_Fix_Due_Diligence.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4.1 Know, Show & Fix: Due Diligence",
      "question": "<p>What score did the company achieve for 4.1 Know, Show &amp; Fix: Due Diligence in the Fashion Transparency Index?</p>",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5971621",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5971368",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5971115",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5970862",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5970609",
          "weight": "20.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1_Know_Show_Fix_Due_Diligence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5978738,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3. Traceability Score (2020)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2020.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3. Traceability Score (2020)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 3. Traceability in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r<br>\n<p>The Fashion Transparency Index 2020 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r<br>\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r<br>\n<p>This year for the first time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r<br>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5971874",
          "weight": "34.18"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5963958",
          "weight": "35.44"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5963706",
          "weight": "30.38"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2020+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5978992,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4. Know, Show & Fix Score (2020)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2020.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4. Know, Show & Fix Score (2020)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 4. Know, Show & Fix in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Fashion Transparency Index 2020 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This year for the first time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r<br>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5978483",
          "weight": "7.94"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5978229",
          "weight": "12.70"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5977975",
          "weight": "47.62"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5977720",
          "weight": "19.05"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5976955",
          "weight": "12.70"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2020+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 5990097,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Living Wages Paid Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wages_Paid_Score.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Living Wages Paid Score",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative tool called Fashion Checker.<br><br>The <a href=\"https://fashionchecker.org/\">Fashion Checker</a> enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</p>",
      "methodology": "<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A</span>: The brand publicly claims that 100% of its supplier factories pay workers a living wage, states which living wage benchmark is used and discloses wage levels at facility-level in their supply chain.</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">B</span>: The brand publicly claims that they pay more than 50% of its supplier factories pay workers a living wage, states which living wage benchmark is used and discloses wage levels at a facility-level in their supply chain.</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">C</span>: The brand publicly claims they pay more than 26% of its supplier factories pay workers a living wage, states which living wage benchmark is used and which portion of the supply chain they are referring (at minimum by country level).</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">D</span>: The brand publicly claims they pay between 1 and 25% of its supplier factories pay workers a living wage, states which living wage benchmark is used and which portion of the supply chain they are referring (at minimum by country level).</li>\r\n<li><strong>E</strong>: The brand does not (claim to) pay a living wage to any of its workers.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "A",
        "B",
        "C",
        "D",
        "E"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1632,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 389,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wages_Paid_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6008262,
      "name": "University of Wollongong Research Group 2020+Wollongong 2020 - Climate Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Wollongong_Research_Group_2020+Wollongong_2020_Climate_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "University of Wollongong Research Group 2020",
      "title": "Wollongong 2020 - Climate Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following fifteen climate-related metrics does the company disclose? ",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This disclosure metric assesses how many of the above indicators were reported by a company on a specific year. The metric selection is based on research done by a group of University of Wollongong students, who are contributing research t<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">o better understand how</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> some of the largest apparel companies</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> are reporting with regards to their environmental impacts and </span><a href=\"https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg13\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">Sustainable Development Goal 13: Climate Action</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The apparel industry is of particular relevance as one of the world’s most polluting industries, responsible for an estimated 8.1% of global greenhouse gas emissions in 2016, amounting to 3,290 million tonnes of CO2eq.</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reputational Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var answers, m14, m15;\n\n  if (m14 === \"No\") {\n    m14 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  if (m15 === \"No\") {\n    m15 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  answers = [m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, m8, m9, m10, m11, m12, m13, m14, m15];\n\n  numKnown(answers) * 100 / 15;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~826615",
          "unknown": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~801383",
          "unknown": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~826629",
          "unknown": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~836952",
          "unknown": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~3341341",
          "unknown": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~1523012",
          "unknown": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~846580",
          "unknown": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m8",
          "metric": "~849642",
          "unknown": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m9",
          "metric": "~836964",
          "unknown": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m10",
          "metric": "~3341320",
          "unknown": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m11",
          "metric": "~5468225",
          "unknown": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m12",
          "metric": "~5467309",
          "unknown": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m13",
          "metric": "~2644456",
          "unknown": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m14",
          "metric": "~5749396",
          "unknown": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m15",
          "metric": "~5662009",
          "unknown": "Unknown"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 181,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 63,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Wollongong_Research_Group_2020+Wollongong_2020_Climate_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6018839,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Responsible Minerals Initiative Membership",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Responsible_Minerals_Initiative_Membership.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Responsible Minerals Initiative Membership",
      "question": "Is the organization a member of the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) and if so which member type?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>See the public RMI member list here: https://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/about/members-and-collaborations/</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Vendor Member",
        "Association Partner",
        "Association Member",
        "Company Member",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 640,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 640,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Responsible_Minerals_Initiative_Membership+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6018880,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+International Copper Alliance Membership",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+International_Copper_Alliance_Membership.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "International Copper Alliance Membership",
      "question": "Is the organization a member of the International Copper Alliance (ICA) and if so which member type?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>See the public ICA member list here: https://copperalliance.org/ica-membership/ica-members/</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Midstream Smelter/Refiner",
        "Fabricator",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 521,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 521,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+International_Copper_Alliance_Membership+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6018906,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Cobalt Institute Membership",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Cobalt_Institute_Membership.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Cobalt Institute Membership",
      "question": "Is the organization a member of the Cobalt Institute (CI) and if so which member type?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">See the public CI member list here: </span><a href=\"https://www.cobaltinstitute.org/members-directory.html\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.cobaltinstitute.org/members-directory.html</a></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Full",
        "Associate Industrial",
        "Associate Services",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 528,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 528,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Cobalt_Institute_Membership+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6018924,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Aluminium Stewardship Initiative Membership",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Aluminium_Stewardship_Initiative_Membership.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Aluminium Stewardship Initiative Membership",
      "question": "Is the organization a member of the Aluminium Stewardship Initiative (ASI) and if so which member type?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">See the public ASI member list here: </span><a href=\"https://aluminium-stewardship.org/about-asi/current-members/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://aluminium-stewardship.org/about-asi/current-members/</a></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Associations",
        "Civil Society",
        "Downstream Supporters",
        "General Supporters",
        "Industrial Users",
        "Production and Transformation",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 518,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 517,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Aluminium_Stewardship_Initiative_Membership+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6018947,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+ResponsibleSteel Membership",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+ResponsibleSteel_Membership.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "ResponsibleSteel Membership",
      "question": "Is the organization a member of ResponsibleSteel (RS) and if so which member type?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">See the public RS member list here: </span><a href=\"https://www.responsiblesteel.org/membership/members-and-associates/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.responsiblesteel.org/membership/members-and-associates/</a></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Business",
        "Civil Society & Social/Environmental",
        "Associates",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 541,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 541,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+ResponsibleSteel_Membership+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019393,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Surveyed Workers Under Age of 26",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Surveyed_Workers_Under_Age_of_26.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Surveyed Workers Under Age of 26",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers is under the age of 25?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 62,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 47,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Surveyed_Workers_Under_Age_of_26+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019404,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Surveyed Workers in Age Range 26-40",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Surveyed_Workers_in_Age_Range_26_40.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Surveyed Workers in Age Range 26-40",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers is in the age range 25-40?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 62,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 47,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Surveyed_Workers_in_Age_Range_26_40+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019415,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Surveyed Workers Over 40",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Surveyed_Workers_Over_40.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Surveyed Workers Over 40",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers is over the age of 40?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 56,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 47,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Surveyed_Workers_Over_40+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019426,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Workers Surveyed - Male",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Surveyed_Male.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Workers Surveyed - Male",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers identify as male?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 335,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 261,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Surveyed_Male+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019437,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Workers Surveyed - Female",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Surveyed_Female.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Workers Surveyed - Female",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers identify as female?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 335,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 261,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Surveyed_Female+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019448,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Workers Surveyed - Neither Male or Female",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Surveyed_Neither_Male_or_Female.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Workers Surveyed - Neither Male or Female",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers identify as neither male or female?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Surveyed_Neither_Male_or_Female+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019459,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Surveyed Workers with Children",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Surveyed_Workers_with_Children.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Surveyed Workers with Children",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers have children?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Surveyed_Workers_with_Children+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019470,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Surveyed Workers Living at Same Residence as Their Children",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Surveyed_Workers_Living_at_Same_Residence_as_Their_Children.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Surveyed Workers Living at Same Residence as Their Children",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers live at the same residence as their children?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Surveyed_Workers_Living_at_Same_Residence_as_Their_Children+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019481,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Factory Region / Province",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Factory_Region_Province.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Factory Region / Province",
      "question": "What region or province is this factory based in?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 206,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 202,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Factory_Region_Province+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019491,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Factory City",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Factory_City.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Factory City",
      "question": "What city is this factory based in?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Factory_City+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019511,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Surveyed Workers Who Know Which Brands They Produce For",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Surveyed_Workers_Who_Know_Which_Brands_They_Produce_For.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Surveyed Workers Who Know Which Brands They Produce For",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers knows which brands their factory makes products for?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 39,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Surveyed_Workers_Who_Know_Which_Brands_They_Produce_For+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019522,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Percentage of Surveyed Workers Able to Meet 0-20% of Production Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Percentage_of_Surveyed_Workers_Able_to_Meet_0_20_of_Production_Target.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Percentage of Surveyed Workers Able to Meet 0-20% of Production Target",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers is able to meet 0-20% of their production target or (daily) quota, without working overtime?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Percentage_of_Surveyed_Workers_Able_to_Meet_0_20_of_Production_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019533,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Percentage of Surveyed Workers Able to Meet 20-40% of Production Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Percentage_of_Surveyed_Workers_Able_to_Meet_20_40_of_Production_Target.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Percentage of Surveyed Workers Able to Meet 20-40% of Production Target",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers is able to meet 20-40% of their production target or (daily) quota, without working overtime?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Percentage_of_Surveyed_Workers_Able_to_Meet_20_40_of_Production_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019544,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Percentage of Surveyed Workers Able to Meet 40-60% of Production Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Percentage_of_Surveyed_Workers_Able_to_Meet_40_60_of_Production_Target.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Percentage of Surveyed Workers Able to Meet 40-60% of Production Target",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers is able to meet 40-60% of their production target or (daily) quota, without working overtime?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Percentage_of_Surveyed_Workers_Able_to_Meet_40_60_of_Production_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019555,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Percentage of Surveyed Workers Able to Meet 60-80% of Production Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Percentage_of_Surveyed_Workers_Able_to_Meet_60_80_of_Production_Target.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Percentage of Surveyed Workers Able to Meet 60-80% of Production Target",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers is able to meet 60-80% of their production target or (daily) quota, without working overtime?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Percentage_of_Surveyed_Workers_Able_to_Meet_60_80_of_Production_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019566,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Percentage of Surveyed Workers Able to Meet 80-100% of Production Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Percentage_of_Surveyed_Workers_Able_to_Meet_80_100_of_Production_Target.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Percentage of Surveyed Workers Able to Meet 80-100% of Production Target",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers is able to meet 80-100% of their production target or (daily) quota, withour working overtime?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Percentage_of_Surveyed_Workers_Able_to_Meet_80_100_of_Production_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019577,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Average Monthly Worker Overtime",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Average_Monthly_Worker_Overtime.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Average Monthly Worker Overtime",
      "question": "What is the average monthly overtime for the company's surveyed workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Hours",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 316,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 244,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Average_Monthly_Worker_Overtime+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019588,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Average Number of Days Worked Exceeding Official Workdays (Monthly)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Average_Number_of_Days_Worked_Exceeding_Official_Workdays_Monthly.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Average Number of Days Worked Exceeding Official Workdays (Monthly)",
      "question": "What is the average number of days worked exceeding official workdays by the company's surveyed workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Days",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Average_Number_of_Days_Worked_Exceeding_Official_Workdays_Monthly+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019599,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Average Worker Commute (Daily)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Average_Worker_Commute_Daily.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Average Worker Commute (Daily)",
      "question": "What is the average daily communte time for the company's surveyed workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Minutes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Average_Worker_Commute_Daily+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019610,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Surveyed Workers with Written Contract",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Surveyed_Workers_with_Written_Contract.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Surveyed Workers with Written Contract",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers has a written employement contract?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Surveyed_Workers_with_Written_Contract+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019621,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Surveyed Workers with Permanent Contract",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Surveyed_Workers_with_Permanent_Contract.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Surveyed Workers with Permanent Contract",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's workers has a permanent employment contract?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 39,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 35,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Surveyed_Workers_with_Permanent_Contract+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019632,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Surveyed Workers with Temporary Contract",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Surveyed_Workers_with_Temporary_Contract.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Surveyed Workers with Temporary Contract",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's workers has a temporary employment contract?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 32,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Surveyed_Workers_with_Temporary_Contract+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019643,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Average Duration of Temporary Contracts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Average_Duration_of_Temporary_Contracts.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Average Duration of Temporary Contracts",
      "question": "What is the average duration of the temporary employment contracts of the company's surveyed workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Months",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Average_Duration_of_Temporary_Contracts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019654,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Workers Directly Employed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Directly_Employed.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Workers Directly Employed",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers is directly employed by the company/factory itself?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Directly_Employed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019665,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Workers Employed by Labour Intermediary",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Employed_by_Labour_Intermediary.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Workers Employed by Labour Intermediary",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers is employed by a labour intermediary?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Employed_by_Labour_Intermediary+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019676,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Workers Self-employed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Self_employed.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Workers Self-employed",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's workers is officially self-employed?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Self_employed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019687,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Average Net Worker Salary (EUR equivalent)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Average_Net_Worker_Salary_EUR_equivalent.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Average Net Worker Salary (EUR equivalent)",
      "question": "<p>What is the monthly, average net salary in the EUR equivalent of the local currency (excluding bonuses and overtime) of the company's surveyed workers?</p>",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.</p>\r\n<p>Clean Clothes Campaign defines a living wage as wage that is 'earned in a standard working week of no more than 48 hours and allows the garment worker to be able to buy food for herself and her family, pay the rent, pay for healthcare, clothing, transportation and education and have a small amount of savings for when something unexpected happens.' (Source: [[https://cleanclothes.org/living-wages|CCC]])</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br><br>To conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br><br>If you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br><br>Please note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "EUR",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 345,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 266,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Average_Wage_Gap_Minimum_to_Actual_Wage.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Yearly_Change_in_Average_Net_Worker_Salary_EUR_equivalent.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wage_Gap_Actual_Wages_as_of_Living_Wage_Benchmark.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Average_Net_Worker_Salary_EUR_equivalent+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019698,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Workers with Specific Payslip",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_with_Specific_Payslip.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Workers with Specific Payslip",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers recieves a payslip specifying their wage?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_with_Specific_Payslip+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019709,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Workers with Incorrect Payslip",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_with_Incorrect_Payslip.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Workers with Incorrect Payslip",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers recieves a payslip with incorrect or incomplete information?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_with_Incorrect_Payslip+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019720,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Average Gross Worker Salary (EUR equivalent)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Average_Gross_Worker_Salary_EUR_equivalent.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Average Gross Worker Salary (EUR equivalent)",
      "question": "<p>What is the monthly, average gross salary in EUR equivalent of the local currency (including taxes, social insurrance, and additional allowances) listed on the payslip of the company's surveyed workers?</p>",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br><br>To conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br><br>If you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br><br>Please note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.</p>\r\n<p><strong>***Please Note***</strong></p>\r\n<blockquote>\r\n<div>\r\n<blockquote>\r\n<div>\r\n<blockquote>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<blockquote>\r\n<div>\r\n<p>In a number of cases it was impossible to get to a workers' actual gross wage. The gross salary is not always listed on workers' payslips. Gross wages might therefore not always be accurate, as we listed what workers reported.</p>\r\n</div>\r\n</blockquote>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n</blockquote>\r\n</div>\r\n</blockquote>\r\n</div>\r\n</blockquote>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "EUR",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Average_Gross_Worker_Salary_EUR_equivalent+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019731,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Workers Not Paid for Overtime",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Not_Paid_for_Overtime.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Workers Not Paid for Overtime",
      "question": "<p>What percentage of the company's surveyed workers do not get paid for overtime?</p>",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br><br>To conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br><br>If you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br><br>Please note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "0-20",
        "20-40",
        "40-60",
        "60-80",
        "80-100"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Not_Paid_for_Overtime+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019742,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Workers Who Have Fainted",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Who_Have_Fainted.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Workers Who Have Fainted",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers have fainted while at work?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Who_Have_Fainted+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019753,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Workers Who Had a Glucose Drip",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Who_Had_a_Glucose_Drip.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Workers Who Had a Glucose Drip",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers has received a glucose drip in order to return to work after fainting?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Who_Had_a_Glucose_Drip+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019764,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Workers Who Have Experienced Violence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Who_Have_Experienced_Violence.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Workers Who Have Experienced Violence",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers has faced violence in the factory?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br>\n<br>\nTo conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br>\n<br>\nIf you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br>\n<br>\nPlease note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Who_Have_Experienced_Violence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019775,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Workers Who Have Been Pregnant",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Who_Have_Been_Pregnant.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Workers Who Have Been Pregnant",
      "question": "<p>What percentage of the company's surveyed workers has been pregnant during employment at the factory?</p>",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br><br>To conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br><br>If you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br><br>Please note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Who_Have_Been_Pregnant+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019786,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Workers Who Had Pregnancy Leave",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Who_Had_Pregnancy_Leave.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Workers Who Had Pregnancy Leave",
      "question": "<p>What percentage of the company's surveyed workers, who have been pregnant during their time at the company, had pregnancy leave?</p>",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br><br>To conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br><br>If you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br><br>Please note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Who_Had_Pregnancy_Leave+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019797,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Childcare Provided in Factory",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Childcare_Provided_in_Factory.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Childcare Provided in Factory",
      "question": "Does the company provide childcare in the factory?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br>\n<br>\nThe Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br>\n<br>\nThe aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nThe research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br><br>To conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br><br>If you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br><br><em>Please note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.</em></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Childcare_Provided_in_Factory+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6019808,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Time Spent on Domestic Work",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Time_Spent_on_Domestic_Work.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Time Spent on Domestic Work",
      "question": "<p>What is the mode (most frequently reported) amount of time that the company's surveyed workers spend on domestic work (cooking, cleaning, child care, etc.) on a daily basis?</p>",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. <br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. <br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. <br><br>To conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.<br><br>If you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. <br><br>Please note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "less than 1 hour",
        "1-1.5 hrs",
        "1.6-2 hrs",
        "2.1-2.5 hrs",
        "2.6-3 hrs",
        "3.1-3.5 hrs",
        "3.6-4 hrs",
        "more than 4 hrs"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Hours",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Time_Spent_on_Domestic_Work+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6020891,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Supervisor Gender Balance",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supervisor_Gender_Balance.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Supervisor Gender Balance",
      "question": "For every female supervisor, how many male supervisors are there at the company / factory? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. </p>\r\n<p>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. </p>\r\n<p>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</p>\r\n<p>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. </p>\r\n<p>To conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.</p>\r\n<p>If you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. </p>\r\n<p><em>Please note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.</em></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": ":1",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supervisor_Gender_Balance+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6020927,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Collective Bargaining Agreement (% of Surveyed Workers)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Collective_Bargaining_Agreement_of_Surveyed_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Collective Bargaining Agreement (% of Surveyed Workers)",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers are covered by a collective agreement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. </p>\r\n<p>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. </p>\r\n<p>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</p>\r\n<p>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Collective Bargaining Agreement</span>: </span>written agreements regarding working conditions and terms of employment concluded between one or more employers or employers' organizations, on the one hand, and one or more representative workers' organizations or duly elected and authorised representatives of the workers (according to national laws and regulations), on the other. Ministries of Labour often maintain administrative records on CBA, including information on collective bargaining coverage, content and duration of the agreements.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: <a href=\"https://www.ilo.org/ilostat-files/Documents/Statistical%20Glossary.pdf\">ILO</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. </p>\r\n<p>To conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.</p>\r\n<p>If you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. </p>\r\n<p><em>Please note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.</em></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 291,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 238,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Collective_Bargaining_Agreement_of_Surveyed_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6059550,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Reports on Unionization",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Reports_on_Unionization.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Reports on Unionization",
      "question": "Does the company publicly report information on unions and collective bargaining agreements in supplier operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is asking whether the company publicly reports information on unions and collective bargaining agreements in their supplier operations. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents, annual reports and sustainability reports.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">Keywords and Search Terms</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Collective bargaining</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Unionization</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Union</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Supply chain</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">Answer Input</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">publicly reports on unionization and worker representatives in its supplier factories</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, enter the answer as 'Yes'. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company reports publicly some information on the number of supplier facilities with democratically elected unions or those covered by collective bargaining agreements, enter the answer as 'Partial'. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company does not publicly report on unionization of workers nor on existing collective bargaining agreements in its supplier factories, enter the answer as 'No'. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Please note: 'Unknown' is not a possible answer for this metric.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 108,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 108,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Reports_on_Unionization+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6126342,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Worker Activities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Worker_Activities.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Worker Activities",
      "question": "What are the main activities reported by the company's surveyed workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><em>Please note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.</em></p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Cutting",
        "Ironing/pressing",
        "Packaging",
        "Sewing",
        "Other"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 285,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 222,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Worker_Activities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6126355,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Workers with Daily Quotas",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_with_Daily_Quotas.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Workers with Daily Quotas",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers have daily quotas?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><em>Please note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.</em></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 25,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 25,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_with_Daily_Quotas+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6126364,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Workers Reaching Daily Quotas",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Reaching_Daily_Quotas.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Workers Reaching Daily Quotas",
      "question": "What share of their daily quotas do the company's surveyed workers typically meet?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><em>Please note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.</em></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "0-20%",
        "20-40%",
        "40-60%",
        "60-80%",
        "80-100%"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Reaching_Daily_Quotas+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6126379,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Workers Who Do Not Know If They Have CBA",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Who_Do_Not_Know_If_They_Have_CBA.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Workers Who Do Not Know If They Have CBA",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's surveyed workers knows whether they are covered by a Collective Bargaining Agreement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, </span><a href=\"https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong>Collective Bargaining Agreement</strong>: </span>written agreements regarding working conditions and terms of employment concluded between one or more employers or employers' organizations, on the one hand, and one or more representative workers' organizations or duly elected and authorised representatives of the workers (according to national laws and regulations), on the other. Ministries of Labour often maintain administrative records on CBA, including information on collective bargaining coverage, content and duration of the agreements.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.ilo.org/ilostat-files/Documents/Statistical%20Glossary.pdf\">ILO</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at </span><a href=\"mailto:info@wikirate.org\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">info@wikirate.org</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> for more information about the research process.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Please note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.</span></em></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Workers_Who_Do_Not_Know_If_They_Have_CBA+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6126388,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Hours of Sleep",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Hours_of_Sleep.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Hours of Sleep",
      "question": "How many daily hours of sleep did the company’s surveyed workers report on average?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, </span><a href=\"https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">, is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at </span><a href=\"mailto:info@wikirate.org\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">info@wikirate.org</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> for more information about the research process.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><em><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Please note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.</span></em></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "hours",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Hours_of_Sleep+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6126450,
      "name": "Core+Country",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Country.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Country",
      "question": "In which country is the company primarily based? ",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Afghanistan",
        "Albania",
        "Algeria",
        "American Samoa",
        "Andorra",
        "Angola",
        "Anguilla",
        "Antarctica",
        "Antigua and Barbuda",
        "Argentina",
        "Armenia",
        "Aruba",
        "Australia",
        "Austria",
        "Azerbaijan",
        "Bahamas",
        "Bahrain",
        "Bangladesh",
        "Barbados",
        "Belarus",
        "Belgium",
        "Belize",
        "Benin",
        "Bermuda",
        "Bhutan",
        "Bolivia",
        "Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba",
        "Bosnia and Herzegovina",
        "Botswana",
        "Bouvet Island",
        "Brazil",
        "British Indian Ocean Territory",
        "British Virgin Islands",
        "Brunei Darussalam",
        "Bulgaria",
        "Burkina Faso",
        "Burundi",
        "Cambodia",
        "Cameroon",
        "Canada",
        "Cape Verde",
        "Cayman Islands",
        "Central African Republic",
        "Chad",
        "Chile",
        "China",
        "Christmas Island",
        "Cocos (Keeling) Islands",
        "Colombia",
        "Comoros",
        "Congo",
        "Cook Islands",
        "Costa Rica",
        "Croatia",
        "Cuba",
        "Curaçao",
        "Cyprus",
        "Czech Republic",
        "Côte d'Ivoire",
        "Democratic Republic of the Congo",
        "Denmark",
        "Djibouti",
        "Dominica",
        "Dominican Republic",
        "Ecuador",
        "Egypt",
        "El Salvador",
        "Equatorial Guinea",
        "Eritrea",
        "Estonia",
        "Ethiopia",
        "Falkland Islands (Malvinas)",
        "Faroe Islands",
        "Fiji",
        "Finland",
        "France",
        "French Guiana",
        "French Polynesia",
        "French Southern Territories",
        "Gabon",
        "Gambia",
        "Georgia",
        "Germany",
        "Ghana",
        "Gibraltar",
        "Greece",
        "Greenland",
        "Grenada",
        "Guadeloupe",
        "Guam",
        "Guatemala",
        "Guernsey",
        "Guinea",
        "Guinea-Bissau",
        "Guyana",
        "Haiti",
        "Heard Island and McDonald Islands",
        "Holy See (Vatican City State)",
        "Honduras",
        "Hong Kong",
        "Hungary",
        "Iceland",
        "India",
        "Indonesia",
        "Iran",
        "Iraq",
        "Ireland",
        "Isle of Man",
        "Israel",
        "Italy",
        "Jamaica",
        "Japan",
        "Jersey",
        "Jordan",
        "Kazakhstan",
        "Kenya",
        "Kiribati",
        "Korea, Democratic People's Republic of",
        "Korea, Republic of",
        "Kosovo",
        "Kuwait",
        "Kyrgyzstan",
        "Lao People's Democratic Republic",
        "Laos",
        "Latvia",
        "Lebanon",
        "Lesotho",
        "Liberia",
        "Libya",
        "Liechtenstein",
        "Lithuania",
        "Luxembourg",
        "Macao",
        "Madagascar",
        "Malawi",
        "Malaysia",
        "Maldives",
        "Mali",
        "Malta",
        "Marshall Islands",
        "Martinique",
        "Mauritania",
        "Mauritius",
        "Mayotte",
        "Mexico",
        "Micronesia, Federated States of",
        "Moldova",
        "Monaco",
        "Mongolia",
        "Montenegro",
        "Montserrat",
        "Morocco",
        "Mozambique",
        "Myanmar",
        "Namibia",
        "Nauru",
        "Nepal",
        "Netherlands",
        "New Caledonia",
        "New Zealand",
        "Nicaragua",
        "Niger",
        "Nigeria",
        "Niue",
        "Norfolk Island",
        "North Macedonia",
        "Northern Mariana Islands",
        "Norway",
        "Oman",
        "Pakistan",
        "Palau",
        "Palestinian Territory",
        "Panama",
        "Papua New Guinea",
        "Paraguay",
        "Peru",
        "Philippines",
        "Pitcairn",
        "Poland",
        "Portugal",
        "Puerto Rico",
        "Qatar",
        "Romania",
        "Russia",
        "Rwanda",
        "Réunion",
        "Saint Barthélemy",
        "Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha",
        "Saint Kitts and Nevis",
        "Saint Lucia",
        "Saint Martin (French part)",
        "Saint Pierre and Miquelon",
        "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines",
        "Samoa",
        "San Marino",
        "Sao Tome and Principe",
        "Saudi Arabia",
        "Senegal",
        "Serbia",
        "Seychelles",
        "Sierra Leone",
        "Singapore",
        "Sint Maarten (Dutch part)",
        "Slovakia",
        "Slovenia",
        "Solomon Islands",
        "Somalia",
        "South Africa",
        "South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands",
        "South Sudan",
        "Spain",
        "Sri Lanka",
        "Sudan",
        "Suriname",
        "Svalbard and Jan Mayen",
        "Swaziland",
        "Sweden",
        "Switzerland",
        "Syrian Arab Republic",
        "Taiwan",
        "Tajikistan",
        "Tanzania",
        "Thailand",
        "Timor-Leste",
        "Togo",
        "Tokelau",
        "Tonga",
        "Trinidad and Tobago",
        "Tunisia",
        "Turkey",
        "Turkmenistan",
        "Turks and Caicos Islands",
        "Tuvalu",
        "U.S. Virgin Islands",
        "Uganda",
        "Ukraine",
        "United Arab Emirates",
        "United Kingdom",
        "United States",
        "United States Minor Outlying Islands",
        "Uruguay",
        "Uzbekistan",
        "Vanuatu",
        "Venezuela",
        "Vietnam",
        "Wallis and Futuna",
        "Western Sahara",
        "Yemen",
        "Zambia",
        "Zimbabwe",
        "Åland Islands"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  country(m1);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5456201"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 138707,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 138704,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Country+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6140253,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Twitter Handle",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Twitter_Handle.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Twitter Handle",
      "question": "What is the company's twitter handle? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is asking for the company's Twitter handle. Start by searching for the company name on twitter: </span>https://twitter.com/explore</p>\r\n<p>If the company is a parent company of a fashion brand, they may use the brand name as their twitter handle. This can be added as the answer. </p>\r\n<p>If you find the company's twitter handle, enter it into the answer box making sure to include the '@' at the beginning of the handle. Cite the company's twitter profile page as the source. </p>\r\n<p>If you cannot find a twitter handle, enter the answer as 'Unknown' and cite the company's website as the source. </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 101,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 89,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Twitter_Handle+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6147050,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Net Minimum Wage (EUR equivalent)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Net_Minimum_Wage_EUR_equivalent.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Net Minimum Wage (EUR equivalent)",
      "question": "What is the monthly, net minimum wage in euro equivalent at this company/facility?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric question has been adapted from a questionnaire created by Clean Clothes Campaign to survey factory employees on working conditions in their place of work. To obtain a factory-wide metric answer and protect the workers who have taken part, the data from these individual surveys is aggregated and an average result calculated across all the workers surveyed from a particular factory. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To conduct this research, the Clean Clothes Campaign research team created a questionnaire which can be administered in a face-to-face interview, telephone interview or through a digital survey.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If you would like to use this research metric to gather data on working conditions, please contact us at info@wikirate.org for more information about the research process. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Please note that this metric must be researched through directly surveying factory workers and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "EUR",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 545,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 152,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Average_Wage_Gap_Minimum_to_Actual_Wage.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Net_Minimum_Wage_EUR_equivalent+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6147188,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Average Wage Gap - Minimum to Actual Wage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Average_Wage_Gap_Minimum_to_Actual_Wage.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Average Wage Gap - Minimum to Actual Wage",
      "question": "What is the monthly, average gap between minimum and actual wages (in EUR) for workers at this company/facility?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This calculated metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "EUR",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 - m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~6019687"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~6147050"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 183,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 148,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Average_Wage_Gap_Minimum_to_Actual_Wage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6200405,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Living Wages Paid Score (Text)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wages_Paid_Score_Text.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Living Wages Paid Score (Text)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.",
        "There was no evidence found on the brand’s claims that it pays a living wage and no plausible explanation was given. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.",
        "The company claims that it has started contributing towards a living wage by paying higher prices factories in its supply chain but these prices still do not cover labour costs. Which means the majority of the workers making their clothes do not earn enough to live on.",
        "The brand claims that between 1 and 25% of supplier factories in the company’s supply chain pay workers a living wage. This is public information. The majority of workers in the brand’s supply chain do not earn enough to live on.",
        "The brand claims that 50% or more of its supplier factories are paying a living wage to all their workers, some plausible explanation is given, but the evidence is not public. Which means many of the workers making their clothes do not earn enough to live on."
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 109,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 109,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wages_Paid_Score_Text+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6222564,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Supply Chain Transparency Score (Text)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Transparency_Score_Text.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Supply Chain Transparency Score (Text)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "This brand provides information beyond the basics in a practical, machine-readable format such as Excel spreadsheets which makes the data usable for others.",
        "This brand provides some, but not enough information on the factories and garment workers in its supply chain - it publishes in a practical, machine-readable format.",
        "This brand provides some, but not enough information on the supplier factories and garment workers in its supply chain.",
        "This brand provides basic information like factory names and addresses, product type, number of workers, and supplier group, if the factory is part of a larger entity.",
        "This brand provides no information on the supplier factories and garment workers in its supply chain which is required by the transparency pledge.",
        "This brand provides some information beyond the basics, in a practical, machine-readable format, but but falls short of the minimum needed for the transparency pledge.",
        "This brand provides some information beyond the basics, but falls short of the minimum needed for the transparency pledge.",
        "This brand provides basic information in a practical, machine-readable format such as Excel spreadsheets which makes the data usable for others.",
        "This brand provides information beyond the basics such as the gender composition of the workforce, if there is a union or if there is a collective bargaining agreement in place."
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 109,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 109,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Transparency_Score_Text+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6248523,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Sector",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Sector.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Sector",
      "question": "What is the company's primary sector(s)? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Apparel & Textiles",
        "Consumption",
        "Energy & Resource Extraction",
        "Financials",
        "Food & Beverages",
        "Health Care",
        "Hospitality & Recreation",
        "Infrastructure",
        "Resource Transformation",
        "Services",
        "Technology & Communications",
        "Transportation"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1133,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Industry.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Company_Category.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Garment_Sector.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Hospitality_Sector.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Financial_Services_Sector.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Food_Beverages_Sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6261809,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Living Wages Paid Score (Key)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wages_Paid_Score_Key.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Living Wages Paid Score (Key)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": "{\r\n  \"The brand publicly claims that they pay more than 50% of its supplier factories pay workers a living wage, states which living wage benchmark is used and discloses wage levels at a facility-level in their supply chain.\": \"lw_b\",\r\n  \"The brand claims that 50% or more of its supplier factories are paying a living wage to all their workers, some plausible explanation is given, but the evidence is not public. Which means many of the workers making their clothes do not earn enough to live on.\": \"lw_c_50_plausible_notpublic\",\r\n  \"The brand claims that between 1 and 25% of supplier factories in the company’s supply chain pay workers a living wage. This is public information. The majority of workers in the brand’s supply chain do not earn enough to live on.\":\"lw_d_25_public\",\r\n  \"The company claims that it has started contributing towards a living wage by paying higher prices factories in its supply chain but these prices still do not cover labour costs. Which means the majority of the workers making their clothes do not earn enough to live on.\":\"lw_d_started\",\r\n  \"The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.\":\"lw_e_noclaim_notpublic\",\r\n  \"There was no evidence found on the brand’s claims that it pays a living wage and no plausible explanation was given. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.\":\"lw_e_noevidence\"\r\n}",
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1632,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 389,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wages_Paid_Score_Key+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6261816,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Supply Chain Transparency Score (Key)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Transparency_Score_Key.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Supply Chain Transparency Score (Key)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": "{\r\n  \"This brand provides no information on the supplier factories and garment workers in its supply chain which is required by the transparency pledge.\":\"transp_none\",\r\n  \"This brand provides some, but not enough information on the supplier factories and garment workers in its supply chain.\":\"transp_partial\",\r\n  \"This brand provides some information beyond the basics, but falls short of the minimum needed for the transparency pledge.\":\"transp_partial_additional\",\r\n  \"This brand provides some information beyond the basics, in a practical, machine-readable format, but but falls short of the minimum needed for the transparency pledge.\":\"transp_partial_additional_machinereadable\",\r\n  \"This brand provides some, but not enough information on the factories and garment workers in its supply chain - it publishes in a practical, machine-readable format.\":\"transp_partial_machinereadable\",\r\n  \"This brand provides basic information like factory names and addresses, product type, number of workers, and supplier group, if the factory is part of a larger entity.\":\"transp_pledge\",\r\n  \"This brand provides information beyond the basics such as the gender composition of the workforce, if there is a union or if there is a collective bargaining agreement in place.\":\"transp_pledge_additional\",\r\n  \"This brand provides information beyond the basics in a practical, machine-readable format such as Excel spreadsheets which makes the data usable for others.\":\"transp_pledge_additional_machinereadable\",\r\n  \"This brand provides basic information in a practical, machine-readable format such as Excel spreadsheets which makes the data usable for others.\": \"transp_pledge_machinereadable\"\r\n}\r\n",
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 107,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 107,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Transparency_Score_Key+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6282832,
      "name": "George Read+Total Number of Employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Total_Number_of_Employees.json",
      "designer": "George Read",
      "title": "Total Number of Employees",
      "question": "How many people are employed by the organisation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Standard",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Total_Number_of_Employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6282934,
      "name": "George Read+Number of Vehicles Produced",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Number_of_Vehicles_Produced.json",
      "designer": "George Read",
      "title": "Number of Vehicles Produced",
      "question": "How many vehicles did the company produce in this year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Direct_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_1_and_Indirect_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_2_per_Vehicle_Produced.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Waste_for_Disposal_per_Vehicle_Produced.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Indirect_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_2_and_Scope_3_combined_per_Vehicle_Produced.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Number_of_Vehicles_Produced+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6283068,
      "name": "George Read+Direct Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Scope 1) and Indirect Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Scope 2) per Vehicle Produced",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Direct_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_1_and_Indirect_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_2_per_Vehicle_Produced.json",
      "designer": "George Read",
      "title": "Direct Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Scope 1) and Indirect Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Scope 2) per Vehicle Produced",
      "question": "What is the amount of direct and indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (in tonnes of CO2 equivalent) that the organization is directly responsible for per vehicle it produces?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg per Vehicle",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2 * 1000;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3432335"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~6282934"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Direct_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_1_and_Indirect_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_2_per_Vehicle_Produced+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6283316,
      "name": "As You Sow+Environmental Shareholder Resolutions Filed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Environmental_Shareholder_Resolutions_Filed.json",
      "designer": "As You Sow",
      "title": "Environmental Shareholder Resolutions Filed",
      "question": "What environmental shareholder resolutions were filed with the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Carbon Asset Risk",
        "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Management",
        "Unconventional Fossil Energy",
        "Energy Solutions",
        "Deforestation",
        "Recycling and Waste",
        "Water",
        "Nuclear Power and Bhopal",
        "Antibiotics",
        "Animal Products"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Environmental_Shareholder_Resolutions_Filed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6283325,
      "name": "As You Sow+Social Shareholder Resolutions Filed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Social_Shareholder_Resolutions_Filed.json",
      "designer": "As You Sow",
      "title": "Social Shareholder Resolutions Filed",
      "question": "What social shareholder resolutions were filed with the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Animal Treatment",
        "Lobbying",
        "Elections",
        "Other Political Activity",
        "Decent Work",
        "Diversity in the Workplace",
        "Health",
        "Human Rights",
        "Media and Cybersecurity",
        "Other Social Issues"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Philanthropy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Social_Shareholder_Resolutions_Filed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6283334,
      "name": "As You Sow+Governance Shareholder Resolutions Filed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Governance_Shareholder_Resolutions_Filed.json",
      "designer": "As You Sow",
      "title": "Governance Shareholder Resolutions Filed",
      "question": "What governance shareholder resolutions were filed with the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Board Diversity",
        "Board Oversight",
        "Sustainability Metrics Disclosure",
        "ESG Pay Links",
        "Proxy Voting",
        "Ethical Finance",
        "Conservative Groups"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Governance_Shareholder_Resolutions_Filed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6283803,
      "name": "Commons+S&P 500 Index",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+S_P_500_Index.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "S&P 500 Index",
      "question": "Is the company part of the S&P 500 Index?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The S&amp;P 500 <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_market_index\" title=\"Stock market index\">stock market index</a>, maintained by <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%26P_Dow_Jones_Indices\" title=\"S&amp;P Dow Jones Indices\">S&amp;P Dow Jones Indices</a>, comprises 505 <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_stock\" title=\"Common stock\">common stocks</a> issued by 500 <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_capitalization\" title=\"Market capitalization\">large-cap</a> companies and traded on American stock exchanges (including the 30 companies that compose the <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_Jones_Industrial_Average\" title=\"Dow Jones Industrial Average\">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a>), and covers about 80 percent of the American equity market by capitalization. The index is weighted by free-float market capitalization, so more valuable companies account for relatively more of the index. The index constituents and the constituent weights are updated regularly using rules published by S&amp;P Dow Jones Indices. Although called the S&amp;P 500, the index contains 505 stocks because it includes two share classes of stock from 5 of its component companies.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #202122; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;\">Source: [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_S%26P_500_companies|Wikipedia]]</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 500,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+S_P_500_Index+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6285970,
      "name": "Commons+FTSE 250 list",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+FTSE_250_list.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "FTSE 250 list",
      "question": "Is the company on the FTSE 250 list?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The FTSE 250 Index (<a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA/English\" title=\"Help:IPA/English\">/ˈfʊtsiː/</a> <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Pronunciation_respelling_key\" title=\"Help:Pronunciation respelling key\">FUUT-see</a>) is a <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalization-weighted_index\" title=\"Capitalization-weighted index\">capitalisation-weighted index</a> consisting of the 101st to the 350th largest companies listed on the <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Stock_Exchange\" title=\"London Stock Exchange\">London Stock Exchange</a>. Promotions and demotions to and from the index occur quarterly in March, June, September, and December. The Index is calculated in <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_computing\" title=\"Real-time computing\">real-time</a> and published every minute.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Related indices are the <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTSE_100_Index\" title=\"FTSE 100 Index\">FTSE 100 Index</a> (which lists the largest 100 companies), the <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTSE_350_Index\" title=\"FTSE 350 Index\">FTSE 350 Index</a> (which combines the FTSE 100 and 250), the <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTSE_SmallCap_Index\" title=\"FTSE SmallCap Index\">FTSE SmallCap Index</a> and the <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTSE_All-Share_Index\" title=\"FTSE All-Share Index\">FTSE All-Share Index</a> (an aggregation of the FTSE 100 Index, the FTSE 250 Index and the FTSE SmallCap Index).</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Many companies within the index are <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investment_trust\" title=\"Investment trust\">investment trusts</a>. As of 30 September 2008, the net market capitalisation of the FTSE 250 Index was £161 billion (or 13 per cent of the FTSE 100 Index).</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTSE_250_Index|Wikipedia]]</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+FTSE_250_list+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6287167,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Fatalities resulting from work-related ill health, GRI 403-10-a",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Fatalities_resulting_from_work_related_ill_health_GRI_403_10_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Fatalities resulting from work-related ill health, GRI 403-10-a",
      "question": "How many workers died because of work-related ill-health? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><a href=\"/Source_000090317\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 403</a> addresses the topic of occupational health and safety. Healthy and safe work conditions are recognized as a human right and addressed in authoritative intergovernmental instruments, including those of the International Labour Organization (ILO), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and the World Health Organization (WHO).</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Healthy and safe work conditions involve both prevention of physical and mental harm, and promotion of workers’ health. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Work-related ill health </span>can include acute, recurring, and chronic health problems caused or aggravated by work conditions or practices. They include musculoskeletal disorders, skin and respiratory diseases, malignant cancers, diseases caused by physical agents (e.g., noise-induced hearing loss, vibration-caused diseases), and mental illnesses (e.g., anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder).</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify total number of fatalities resulting from work-related ill health that occurred in an organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.  </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Illness</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Health</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- 403-10</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- GRI Index</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If it does not, convert or calculate the answer and document your approach in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "fatalities",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 403 - Occupational Health and Safety",
        "GRI Standards+403-10 Work-related ill health",
        "GRI Standards+403-10-a-i Number of fatalities as a result of work-related ill health",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+S1 - Own Workforce",
        "ESRS Standards+S1.13 - Health and Safety metrics"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Fatalities_resulting_from_work_related_ill_health_GRI_403_10_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6287272,
      "name": "George Read+Proportion of Total Energy Consumed from Renewable Sources",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Proportion_of_Total_Energy_Consumed_from_Renewable_Sources.json",
      "designer": "George Read",
      "title": "Proportion of Total Energy Consumed from Renewable Sources",
      "question": "What is the proportion of a company's total energy consumption that comes from renewable sources?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Proportion_of_Total_Energy_Consumed_from_Renewable_Sources+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6287498,
      "name": "George Read+Total Waste for Disposal",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Total_Waste_for_Disposal.json",
      "designer": "George Read",
      "title": "Total Waste for Disposal",
      "question": "What is the total volume of disposable waste generated by the organisation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Disposable waste is any form of waste that is not reused, recovered or recycled</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric looks for the total waste that:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>goes to landfill</li>\r\n<li>is incinerated</li>\r\n<li>comes under 'other' methods of disposal.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Tons",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Waste_for_Disposal_per_Vehicle_Produced.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Total_Waste_for_Disposal+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6287540,
      "name": "George Read+Waste for Disposal per Vehicle Produced",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Waste_for_Disposal_per_Vehicle_Produced.json",
      "designer": "George Read",
      "title": "Waste for Disposal per Vehicle Produced",
      "question": "How much disposable waste does the organisation generate per vehicle that it produces?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg per Vehicle",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2 * 1000;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~6287498"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~6282934"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Waste_for_Disposal_per_Vehicle_Produced+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6287819,
      "name": "George Read+Proportion of Employees That Have Disabilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Proportion_of_Employees_That_Have_Disabilities.json",
      "designer": "George Read",
      "title": "Proportion of Employees That Have Disabilities",
      "question": "What proportion of the total workforce have disabilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Disability Inclusion",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Proportion_of_Employees_That_Have_Disabilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6287884,
      "name": "George Read+Indirect Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Scope 2 and Scope 3 combined) per Vehicle Produced",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Indirect_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_2_and_Scope_3_combined_per_Vehicle_Produced.json",
      "designer": "George Read",
      "title": "Indirect Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Scope 2 and Scope 3 combined) per Vehicle Produced",
      "question": "What is the amount of indirect greenhouse gas (scope 2 and scope 3) emissions (in tonnes of CO2 equivalent) that the organisation is directly responsible for per vehicle it produces?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Kg per Vehicle",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  (m1 + m2) / m3 * 1000;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~826629"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~849642"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~6282934"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Indirect_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Scope_2_and_Scope_3_combined_per_Vehicle_Produced+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6287909,
      "name": "Asset Owners Disclosure Project+Climate Risk Management Rating",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Asset_Owners_Disclosure_Project+Climate_Risk_Management_Rating.json",
      "designer": "Asset Owners Disclosure Project",
      "title": "Climate Risk Management Rating",
      "question": "What climate risk management rating was the company rewarded on the AODP Global Climate Index?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "AAA",
        "AA",
        "A",
        "BBB",
        "BB",
        "B",
        "CCC",
        "CC",
        "C",
        "D",
        "X",
        "Not Rated"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 738,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 575,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Asset_Owners_Disclosure_Project+Climate_Risk_Management_Rating+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6287918,
      "name": "Asset Owners Disclosure Project+Climate Risk Management Rank",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Asset_Owners_Disclosure_Project+Climate_Risk_Management_Rank.json",
      "designer": "Asset Owners Disclosure Project",
      "title": "Climate Risk Management Rank",
      "question": "What climate risk management rank was the company rewarded on the AODP Global Climate Index?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 726,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 575,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Asset_Owners_Disclosure_Project+Climate_Risk_Management_Rank+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6287926,
      "name": "Asset Owners Disclosure Project+Insurance Type",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Asset_Owners_Disclosure_Project+Insurance_Type.json",
      "designer": "Asset Owners Disclosure Project",
      "title": "Insurance Type",
      "question": "What type of insurance provider is this company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Mixed",
        "Life",
        "Reinsurance",
        "Property & Casualty"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 88,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 81,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Asset_Owners_Disclosure_Project+Insurance_Type+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6287935,
      "name": "Asset Owners Disclosure Project+Asset Owner Type",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Asset_Owners_Disclosure_Project+Asset_Owner_Type.json",
      "designer": "Asset Owners Disclosure Project",
      "title": "Asset Owner Type",
      "question": "What type of asset owner is this company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Pension fund",
        "Sovereign wealth fund",
        "Endowment",
        "Insurance company",
        "Foundation",
        "Mutual fund"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 694,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 526,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Asset_Owners_Disclosure_Project+Asset_Owner_Type+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6319669,
      "name": "George Read+Average Shareholder Equity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Average_Shareholder_Equity.json",
      "designer": "George Read",
      "title": "Average Shareholder Equity",
      "question": "What is the average shareholder equity of the company in question?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>Average shareholder equity is calculated by adding the shareholder equity at the start of the time period in question to the shareholder equity at the end of the same period and diving by 2. This way an average is found for the time period being looked at.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Return_on_Equity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Average_Shareholder_Equity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6319726,
      "name": "George Read+Return on Equity (%)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Return_on_Equity.json",
      "designer": "George Read",
      "title": "Return on Equity (%)",
      "question": "What is the return on equity for shareholders of the company?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~2070638"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~6319669"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Return_on_Equity_per_ESG_Point_Scored.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Return_on_Equity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6319785,
      "name": "George Read+Earnings per Share of Common Stock",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Earnings_per_Share_of_Common_Stock.json",
      "designer": "George Read",
      "title": "Earnings per Share of Common Stock",
      "question": "What are the earnings per share of common (basic) stock for shareholders of the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>Companies will state this figure in annual and financial reports.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+Earnings_per_Share_of_Common_Stock_USD_per_ESG_Point_Scored.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Earnings_per_Share_of_Common_Stock+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6320007,
      "name": "George Read+Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Earnings_Before_Interest_and_Tax_EBIT.json",
      "designer": "George Read",
      "title": "Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT)",
      "question": "What are the companies earnings before interest and tax are taken into account?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>This figure is usualy stated on income statements included in a company's annual report.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Return_on_Capital_Employed.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Earnings_Before_Interest_and_Tax_EBIT+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6320112,
      "name": "George Read+Capital Employed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Capital_Employed.json",
      "designer": "George Read",
      "title": "Capital Employed",
      "question": "What is the total capital employed, in terms of assets and liabilities, of the company in question?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>This is calculated by finding the 'total assets' of a company for a specific year and then subtracting its 'current liabilities' for the same year.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Return_on_Capital_Employed.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Capital_Employed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6320137,
      "name": "George Read+Return on Capital Employed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Return_on_Capital_Employed.json",
      "designer": "George Read",
      "title": "Return on Capital Employed",
      "question": "What is the return on capital employed of the company?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~6320007"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~6320112"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Return_on_Capital_Employed_per_ESG_Point_Scored.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Return_on_Capital_Employed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6320743,
      "name": "Higher School of Economics Research Group 2020+From Farm to Fork 2020: Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_School_of_Economics_Research_Group_2020+From_Farm_to_Fork_2020_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Higher School of Economics Research Group 2020",
      "title": "From Farm to Fork 2020: Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following thirteen SDG12 & SDG13 indicators are disclosed?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric looks at company disclosure rates based on thirteen metrics researched by the Higher School of Economics on metrics relevant to SDG12 and SDG13. </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, m8, m9, m10, m11, m12, m13]) / 13 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~826615",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~836952",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~836097",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~836051",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~1522301",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~836246",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~848767",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m8",
          "metric": "~846580",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m9",
          "metric": "~3341261",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m10",
          "metric": "~836964",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m11",
          "metric": "~3341320",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m12",
          "metric": "~885125",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m13",
          "metric": "~837284",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 5224,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1131,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Higher_School_of_Economics_Research_Group_2020+From_Farm_to_Fork_2020_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6321601,
      "name": "Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi)+Science Based Target Classification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Science_Based_Targets_Initiative_SBTi+Science_Based_Target_Classification.json",
      "designer": "Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi)",
      "title": "Science Based Target Classification",
      "question": "To what target level has the company committed based on the Science Based Targets Initiative classification system? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Science Based Targets initiative champions science-based target setting as a powerful way of boosting companies’ competitive advantage in the transition to the low-carbon economy.</p>\r\n<p>It is a collaboration between CDP, the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC), World Resources Institute (WRI), and the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and one of the We Mean Business Coalition commitments.</p>\r\n<p>The initiative’s overall aim is that by 2020, science-based target setting will become standard business practice and corporations will play a major role in driving down global greenhouse gas emissions. Embedding science-based targets as a fundamental component of sustainability management practices is crucial in achieving this.</p>\r\n<p>Committed companies have 24 months to have their targets approved and published by the SBTi, or they will be removed from the SBTi website, unless specific circumstances apply. See the protocol to manage expired commitments for more information. All committed companies before April 8th, 2020, have been offered extensions as per the first version of the Protocol to manage expired commitments.</p>\r\n<p>All scope 1 and 2 targets are classified under one of three categories: 2°C, well-below 2°C and 1.5°C. The assessment does not include a classification of scope 3 targets. As of October 15th 2019, the SBTi will only accept target submissions of scope 1 and 2 targets that are in line with either well-below 2°C or 1.5°C trajectory.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To find the answer for the metric, search the <a href=\"https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action/\">Science Based Targets Initiative database</a>. You can type the company's name in the 'Company Name' search box. Alternatively, download the excel file of the data.</p>\r\n<p>The answer can be found under the column 'Target Classification'. Select the answer option appropriate. If the company is not listed on the database, or there is no answer for the company, select 'Unknown' as the answer. </p>\r\n<p>Cite either the database website or the excel file as the source. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "1.5°C",
        "Well-below 2°C",
        "2°C"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 626,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 425,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Science_Based_Targets_Initiative_SBTi+Science_Based_Target_Classification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6321616,
      "name": "Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi)+Science Based Targets Status",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Science_Based_Targets_Initiative_SBTi+Science_Based_Targets_Status.json",
      "designer": "Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi)",
      "title": "Science Based Targets Status",
      "question": "Has the company set a science based target commitment and if so, what is the status of that commitment? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Science Based Targets initiative champions science-based target setting as a powerful way of boosting companies’ competitive advantage in the transition to the low-carbon economy.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">It is a collaboration between CDP, the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC), World Resources Institute (WRI), and the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and one of the We Mean Business Coalition commitments.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The initiative’s overall aim is that by 2020, science-based target setting will become standard business practice and corporations will play a major role in driving down global greenhouse gas emissions. Embedding science-based targets as a fundamental component of sustainability management practices is crucial in achieving this.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Committed companies have 24 months to have their targets approved and published by the SBTi, or they will be removed from the SBTi website, unless specific circumstances apply. See the protocol to manage expired commitments for more information. All committed companies before April 8th, 2020, have been offered extensions as per the first version of the Protocol to manage expired commitments.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">All scope 1 and 2 targets are classified under one of three categories: 2°C, well-below 2°C and 1.5°C. The assessment does not include a classification of scope 3 targets. As of October 15th 2019, the SBTi will only accept target submissions of scope 1 and 2 targets that are in line with either well-below 2°C or 1.5°C trajectory.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To find the answer for the metric, search the <a href=\"https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action/\">Science Based Targets Initiative database</a>. You can type the company's name in the 'Company Name' search box. Alternatively, download the excel file of the data.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The answer can be found under the column 'Status'. Select the answer option appropriate. If the company is not listed on the database, or there is no answer for the company, select 'Unknown' as the answer. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Cite either the database website or the excel file as the source.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Committed",
        "Targets Set",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2610,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 11,
      "companies": 1281,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Top_100_Fashion_Project_Research_Group+Science_Based_Targets.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Science_Based_Targets_Initiative_SBTi+Science_Based_Targets_Status+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6336628,
      "name": "George Read+Total ESG Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Total_ESG_Score.json",
      "designer": "George Read",
      "title": "Total ESG Score",
      "question": "What was the overall ESG performance score for the company between the years 2017, 2018 and 2019?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The figures are exclusive to this study, due to being dependent on the relative performance of the other companies and cannot be used in isolation.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This figure was calculated by finding the mean average for every metric of each company over the years 2017, 2018 and 2019.</p>\r\n<p>Each company was then ranked by these averages from best (1) to worst (6) for all 12 ESG metrics in the study.</p>\r\n<p>All 12 metric scores are then accumulated to form the overall ESG score for every company.</p>\r\n<p>The lower the score, the better the ESG performance.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+Earnings_per_Share_of_Common_Stock_USD_per_ESG_Point_Scored.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Return_on_Equity_per_ESG_Point_Scored.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Return_on_Capital_Employed_per_ESG_Point_Scored.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Total_ESG_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6336784,
      "name": "Aileen Rob+Earnings per Share of Common Stock (USD) per ESG Point Scored",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+Earnings_per_Share_of_Common_Stock_USD_per_ESG_Point_Scored.json",
      "designer": "Aileen Rob",
      "title": "Earnings per Share of Common Stock (USD) per ESG Point Scored",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~6319785"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~6336628"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+Earnings_per_Share_of_Common_Stock_USD_per_ESG_Point_Scored+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6336829,
      "name": "George Read+Return on Equity (%) per ESG Point Scored",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Return_on_Equity_per_ESG_Point_Scored.json",
      "designer": "George Read",
      "title": "Return on Equity (%) per ESG Point Scored",
      "question": "What is the return on equity seen per ESG point scored in the company?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~6319726"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~6336628"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Return_on_Equity_per_ESG_Point_Scored+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6336840,
      "name": "George Read+Return on Capital Employed (%) per ESG Point Scored",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Return_on_Capital_Employed_per_ESG_Point_Scored.json",
      "designer": "George Read",
      "title": "Return on Capital Employed (%) per ESG Point Scored",
      "question": "What is the return on capital employed seen per ESG point scored in the company?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~6320137"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~6336628"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/George_Read+Return_on_Capital_Employed_per_ESG_Point_Scored+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6354190,
      "name": "Aileen Rob+FTSE All-World Index",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+FTSE_All_World_Index.json",
      "designer": "Aileen Rob",
      "title": "FTSE All-World Index",
      "question": "What is the company's constituent weight in the FTSE All-World index?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 385,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 385,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+FTSE_All_World_Index+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6391465,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Sub-sector",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Sub_sector.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Sub-sector",
      "question": "What are the company's sub-sector(s)? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Air Transportation",
        "Alternative Energy",
        "Banking & Investment Banking",
        "Chemicals",
        "Coal",
        "Construction",
        "Construction materials",
        "Consumer goods producers",
        "Consumer goods retailers",
        "Electric utilities",
        "Ethical Banking",
        "Facilities",
        "Food & Beverages producers",
        "Food & Beverages retailers",
        "Industrials",
        "Infrastructure",
        "Insurance",
        "Land Transportation",
        "Manufacturers",
        "Marine Transportation",
        "Metals & Mining",
        "Oil & Gas",
        "Real Estate",
        "Technology",
        "Telecommunications",
        "Utilities",
        "Waste Management"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 293,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 293,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Sub_sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406074,
      "name": "Core+Revenue (EUR)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Revenue_EUR.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Revenue (EUR)",
      "question": "What was the company's total revenue for the year (in EUR)?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In accounting, revenue is the income that a business has from its normal business activities, usually from the sale of goods and services to customers. Revenue is also referred to as sales or turnover. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Revenue should be reported in any company's Annual Report. It may also be possible to find this information in other sources. Any source is acceptable, but in case of discrepancy the official Annual Report should be taken as the correct answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Where a company reports revenue for their financial year, which differs from the calander year, the answer should be assigned to the earlier year. So for example if a company's annual report runs from September 2016 - September 2017 the year should be 2016.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">Monetary unit for this metric is Euros (</span><strong>€</strong><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">)</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. If the value is reported in a currency other than Euros, please consult convert to Euros, and</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; font-weight: bolder;\">add conversion details</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">in the comments section. The following website provides yearly average conversion rates: https://www.ofx.com/en-gb/forex-news/historical-exchange-rates/yearly-average-rates/</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "EUR",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5780267"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 518,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 432,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Revenue_EUR+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406710,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Non-Financial Statement Published (id 1.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Non_Financial_Statement_Published_id_1_1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Non-Financial Statement Published (id 1.1)",
      "question": "Does the company publish a non-financial statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company publishes a non-financial statement. This may be found in an annual report or integrated report.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Refers to its parent company's report",
        "Included within the annual report",
        "Publishes a separate non-financial report",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Non_Financial_Statement_Published_id_1_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406721,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Non-Financial Information Traceability (id 1.3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Non_Financial_Information_Traceability_id_1_3.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Non-Financial Information Traceability (id 1.3)",
      "question": "How traceable is the information provided within the company's non-financial statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking how traceable the information is provided within the company's non-financial statement. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Good",
        "Some information is traced",
        "Not traceable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Non_Financial_Information_Traceability_id_1_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406732,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Non-Financial Documents Consulted (1.3.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Non_Financial_Documents_Consulted_1_3_1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Non-Financial Documents Consulted (1.3.1)",
      "question": "How many documents were consulted for research on the company's non-financial reporting?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking how many company documents were consulted for the non-financial reporting research.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Non_Financial_Documents_Consulted_1_3_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406742,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Non-Financial Documents Linked (1.3.2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Non_Financial_Documents_Linked_1_3_2.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Non-Financial Documents Linked (1.3.2)",
      "question": "Does the company include links to other documents in order to offer broader information?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company provides additional links that offer broader information in their non-financial reporting.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Non_Financial_Documents_Linked_1_3_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406753,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Non-Financial Document KPIs (id 1.4)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Non_Financial_Document_KPIs_id_1_4.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Non-Financial Document KPIs (id 1.4)",
      "question": "How does the company present KPIs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking how the company present KPIs within its non-financial reporting.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "KPIs provided in a summarized statement(s)",
        "KPIs provided in different parts of the report(s)",
        "No KPIs provided"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Non_Financial_Document_KPIs_id_1_4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406764,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Structure of Information Disclosed (id 1.5)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Structure_of_Information_Disclosed_id_1_5.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Structure of Information Disclosed (id 1.5)",
      "question": "Does the company provide information on policies, outcomes, risks, and KPIs in a clear structure?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company provides information on policies, outcomes, risks, and KPIs in a clear structure.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Structure_of_Information_Disclosed_id_1_5+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406775,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Comprehensiveness & Clarity of  Information Disclosed (id 1.6)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Comprehensiveness_Clarity_of_Information_Disclosed_id_1_6.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Comprehensiveness & Clarity of  Information Disclosed (id 1.6)",
      "question": "Does the company report enable an understanding of the undertaking's development, performance, position and impact of its activity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking how comprehensive and clear the company non-financial reporting is and whether it enables understanding of development, performance, position and impact of its activity.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Comprehensiveness_Clarity_of_Information_Disclosed_id_1_6+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406786,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Materiality approach (id 1.10)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Materiality_approach_id_1_10.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Materiality approach (id 1.10)",
      "question": "Is the approach taken to determining the materiality clearly articulated?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company's approach taken to determining the materiality is clearly articulated.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Materiality Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Materiality_approach_id_1_10+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406797,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Business Model Risks (id 2.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Business_Model_Risks_id_2_1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Business Model Risks (id 2.1)",
      "question": "Does the company describe specific risks that may affect its business model, strategy and financial planning?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company describes specific risks that may affect its business model, strategy and financial planning.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Environmental challenges (in general)",
        "Climate change",
        "Explains opportunities related to sustainability challenges",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Business_Model_Risks_id_2_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406808,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Executive Compensation and ESG criteria (id 3.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Executive_Compensation_and_ESG_criteria_id_3_1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Executive Compensation and ESG criteria (id 3.1)",
      "question": "Does the company describe how executive compensation is affected by their performance against ESG criteria?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company describes how executive compensation is affected by their performance against ESG criteria. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Executive_Compensation_and_ESG_criteria_id_3_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406819,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Workforce Representation in Sustainability Strategy (id 3.2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Workforce_Representation_in_Sustainability_Strategy_id_3_2.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Workforce Representation in Sustainability Strategy (id 3.2)",
      "question": "Does the company provide information on engagement of workforce representatives in setting sustainability strategy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company provides information on engagement of workforce representatives in setting sustainability strategy. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Workforce_Representation_in_Sustainability_Strategy_id_3_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406830,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Corporate Governance Sustainability Arrangements (id 3.3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Corporate_Governance_Sustainability_Arrangements_id_3_3.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Corporate Governance Sustainability Arrangements (id 3.3)",
      "question": "Does the company describe corporate governance arrangements to support sustainability, e.g. independent sustainability or impact committee to provide feedback to the Board?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company describes corporate governance arrangements to support sustainability, e.g. independent sustainability or impact committee to provide feedback to the Board. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Corporate_Governance_Sustainability_Arrangements_id_3_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406841,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Sustainability Matters Addressed by Board (id 3.4)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Sustainability_Matters_Addressed_by_Board_id_3_4.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Sustainability Matters Addressed by Board (id 3.4)",
      "question": "Does the company identify sustainability matters addressed by the Board in the previous year and decisions (i.e. delegated actions to management)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company identifies sustainability matters addressed by the Board in the previous year and decisions (i.e. delegated actions to management). This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Sustainability_Matters_Addressed_by_Board_id_3_4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406852,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Non-Financial Statement Frameworks (id 4.1-4.15)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Non_Financial_Statement_Frameworks_id_4_1_4_15.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Non-Financial Statement Frameworks (id 4.1-4.15)",
      "question": "Which of the following national, international or European frameworks does the company's non-financial statement specify it relies on?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company's non-financial statement specifies which frameworks it relies on (national, international or European frameworks). This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "National standards",
        "GRI - Global Reporting Initiative",
        "IIRC - International Integrated Reporting Council",
        "SASB - Sustainability Accounting Standards Board",
        "UNGP - United Nations Guiding Principles Reporting Framework",
        "UNGC - UN Global Compact",
        "OECD Guidelines - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises or general or sectoral due diligence guidances",
        "SDG - United Nations Sustainable Development Goals",
        "Future-Fit Business Benchmark",
        "ISO 26000",
        "CDP environmental reporting system and framework",
        "ILO - International Labour Organization standards",
        "European Commission Guidelines on Non-Financial Reporting",
        "Others",
        "None",
        "Climate Disclosure Standards Board Framework"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Core+Reporting_Frameworks.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Non_Financial_Statement_Frameworks_id_4_1_4_15+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406863,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Climate Change Coverage (id aa)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_Coverage_id_aa.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Climate Change Coverage (id aa)",
      "question": "Does the company address the issue of climate change in its non-financial statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company has addressed climate change in its non-financial statement. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n- Policies<br>\n- Risks<br>\n- Outcomes<br>\n- KPIs<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No, argues lack of risks",
        "No, different explanation",
        "No, no explanation"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_Coverage_id_aa+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406874,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Climate Change Policy (id ab)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_Policy_id_ab.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Climate Change Policy (id ab)",
      "question": "Is a policy related to climate change described in the company's non-financial statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company describes its climate change policy. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n- Policies<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Policy is described or referenced",
        "Policy description specifies key issues and objectives",
        "No information provided"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_Policy_id_ab+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406885,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Climate Change Policy Additional Criteria Reported (id ab1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_Policy_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_ab1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Climate Change Policy Additional Criteria Reported (id ab1)",
      "question": "Which additional criteria related to climate change policy are described?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether additional criteria related to climate change policy are described. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n- Policies<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Company has a climate target",
        "Actions taken to achieve the climate target",
        "Outcomes in terms of meeting the climate targets",
        "Company's climate target is science-based / aligned with the Paris Agreement (i.e. well below 2 degrees C)",
        "Board oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities",
        "(only for financial companies) Describes how the financial institution ensures that its climate-related strategy is aligned with the climate preferences of its clients",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_Policy_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_ab1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406896,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Climate Change Risks Management (id ac)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_Risks_Management_id_ac.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Climate Change Risks Management (id ac)",
      "question": "Are there climate-related risks that could have a material financial impact on the organization described in the company's non-financial statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies’ sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company describes risks related to climate change. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n- Risks<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Description of specific risks",
        "Vague risks identification",
        "No risks identified"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_Risks_Management_id_ac+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406907,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Climate Change Risks Additional Criteria Reported (id ac1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_Risks_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_ac1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Climate Change Risks Additional Criteria Reported (id ac1)",
      "question": "Which additional criteria related to climate change risks are described?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies’ sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether additional criteria related to climate change risks are described. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n- Risks<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Risks & opportunities is provided for each time horizon (short/medium/long term - while each horizon is indicated in years)",
        "Physical risks are addressed (exposure to physical impacts directly caused by climate change)",
        "Transition to a low-carbon economy risks are addressed",
        "Breakdown of risks by activity or region",
        "Effects of climate-related risks & opportunities on the organization's business model financial planning or performance",
        "Clear management approach for the identified risks and impacts",
        "Climate-related scenarios used for risk assessment including a 1.5 degrees C/well below 2 degrees C scenario",
        "(only for fin. comp.) How risk management processes including internal stress testing consider climate-related risks",
        "(only for fin. comp.) Degree of alignment of the different portfolios against the Paris Agreement target",
        "(only for fin. comp.) Amount or percentage of carbon-related assets in each portfolio or exposure of assets to climate risks",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_Risks_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_ac1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406918,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Climate Change Outcomes (id ad)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_Outcomes_id_ad.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Climate Change Outcomes (id ad)",
      "question": "Are outcomes of the company's climate-related policy described in the non-financial statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company describes outcomes related to climate change policy. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n- Outcomes<br>\n- Policies<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Description provided",
        "Outcomes in terms of meeting policy targets",
        "No description"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_Outcomes_id_ad+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406929,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Climate Change Outcomes Additional Criteria Reported (id ad1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_Outcomes_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_ad1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Climate Change Outcomes Additional Criteria Reported (id ad1)",
      "question": "Which additional criteria related to climate change outcomes are described?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether additional criteria related to climate change outcomes are described. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n- Outcomes<br>\n- Policies<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Data / KPI provided for outcomes",
        "(only for asset management companies) The development trend of the amount of carbon-related assets in the different portfolios against any relevant target set and the related risks over time",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_Outcomes_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_ad1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406940,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Climate Change Renewable & Non-renewable Energy Coverage (id ae)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_Renewable_Non_renewable_Energy_Coverage_id_ae.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Climate Change Renewable & Non-renewable Energy Coverage (id ae)",
      "question": "How does the company provide information related to its renewable or non-renewable energy production and/or consumption?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking how the company provides information related to its renewable or non-renewable energy production and/or consumption. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report. <br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n- Energy<br>\n- Renewable<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "KPI aggregated",
        "KPI disaggregated for country",
        "Isolated examples / Qualitative description",
        "No information provided"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_Renewable_Non_renewable_Energy_Coverage_id_ae+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406951,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Climate Change Renewable & Non-renewable Energy Reported (id ae1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_Renewable_Non_renewable_Energy_Reported_id_ae1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Climate Change Renewable & Non-renewable Energy Reported (id ae1)",
      "question": "Does the company publish targets and assurance related to its renewable or non-renewable energy production and/or consumption?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company publishes targets and assurance related to its renewable or non-renewable energy production and/or consumption. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n- Energy<br>\n- Renewable<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Energy efficiency target",
        "Renewable energy production/consumption target",
        "Data is independently assured",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_Renewable_Non_renewable_Energy_Reported_id_ae1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406962,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Climate Change GHG Scope 1 Coverage (id af)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_GHG_Scope_1_Coverage_id_af.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Climate Change GHG Scope 1 Coverage (id af)",
      "question": "How does the company provide information related to its GHG emission total Scope 1?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company provides information related to its GHG emission total Scope 1. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n- Emissions<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "KPI aggregated",
        "KPI disaggregated for country",
        "Isolated examples / Qualitative description",
        "No information provided"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_GHG_Scope_1_Coverage_id_af+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406973,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Climate Change GHG Scope 1 Reported (id af1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_GHG_Scope_1_Reported_id_af1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Climate Change GHG Scope 1 Reported (id af1)",
      "question": "Does the company publish targets and assurance related to its Scope 1 GHG emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company publishes targets and assurance related to its Scope 1 GHG emissions. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n- Emissions<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "GHG emission target",
        "Data are independently assured",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_GHG_Scope_1_Reported_id_af1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406984,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Climate Change GHG Scope 2 Coverage (id ag)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_GHG_Scope_2_Coverage_id_ag.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Climate Change GHG Scope 2 Coverage (id ag)",
      "question": "How does the company provide information related to its GHG emission total Scope 2?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company provides information related to its GHG emission total Scope 2. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n- Emissions<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "KPI aggregated",
        "KPI disaggregated for country",
        "Isolated examples / Qualitative description",
        "No information provided"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_GHG_Scope_2_Coverage_id_ag+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6406995,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Climate Change GHG Scope 2 Reported (id ag1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_GHG_Scope_2_Reported_id_ag1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Climate Change GHG Scope 2 Reported (id ag1)",
      "question": "Does the company publish targets and assurance related to its Scope 2 GHG emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company publishes targets and assurance related to its Scope 2 GHG emissions. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n- Emissions<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "GHG emission target",
        "Data are independently assured",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_GHG_Scope_2_Reported_id_ag1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407006,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Climate Change GHG Scope 3 Coverage (id ah)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_GHG_Scope_3_Coverage_id_ah.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Climate Change GHG Scope 3 Coverage (id ah)",
      "question": "How does the company provide information related to its GHG emission total Scope 3?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company provides information related to its GHG emission total Scope 3. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n- Emissions<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "KPI aggregated",
        "KPI disaggregated for country",
        "Isolated examples / Qualitative description",
        "No information provided"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_GHG_Scope_3_Coverage_id_ah+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407017,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Climate Change GHG Scope 3 Reported (id ah1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_GHG_Scope_3_Reported_id_ah1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Climate Change GHG Scope 3 Reported (id ah1)",
      "question": "Does the company publish targets and assurance related to its Scope 3 GHG emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company publishes targets and assurance related to its Scope 3 GHG emissions. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n- Emissions<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "GHG emission target",
        "Data are independently assured",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_GHG_Scope_3_Reported_id_ah1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407028,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Climate Change GHG Intensity Coverage (id ai)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_GHG_Intensity_Coverage_id_ai.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Climate Change GHG Intensity Coverage (id ai)",
      "question": "How does the company provide information related to its GHG emission intensity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company provides information related to its GHG emission intensity. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n- Emissions<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "KPI aggregated",
        "KPI disaggregated for country",
        "Isolated examples / Qualitative description",
        "No information provided"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_GHG_Intensity_Coverage_id_ai+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407039,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Climate Change GHG Intensity Reported (id ai1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_GHG_Intensity_Reported_id_ai1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Climate Change GHG Intensity Reported (id ai1)",
      "question": "Does the company publish targets and assurance related to its GHG emission intensity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company publishes targets and assurance related to its GHG emissions intensity. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n- Emissions<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "GHG intensity target",
        "Data are independently assured",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Climate_Change_GHG_Intensity_Reported_id_ai1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407050,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Natural Resource Use Coverage (id aj)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Natural_Resource_Use_Coverage_id_aj.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Natural Resource Use Coverage (id aj)",
      "question": "Does the company address the issue of natural resource use in its non-financial statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company has addressed natural resources use in its non-financial statement. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Natural Resource Use<br>\n- Policies<br>\n- Risks<br>\n- Outcomes<br>\n- KPIs<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No, argues lack of risks",
        "No, different explanation",
        "No, no explanation"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Natural_Resource_Use_Coverage_id_aj+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407061,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Natural Resource Use Policy (id ak)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Natural_Resource_Use_Policy_id_ak.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Natural Resource Use Policy (id ak)",
      "question": "Is a policy related to natural resource use described in the company's non-financial statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company describes its natural resource use policy. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Natural Resource Use<br>\n- Policies<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Policy is described or referenced",
        "Policy description specifies key issues and objectives",
        "No information provided"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Materiality Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Natural_Resource_Use_Policy_id_ak+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407072,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Natural Resource Use Policy Additional Criteria Reported (id ak1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Natural_Resource_Use_Policy_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_ak1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Natural Resource Use Policy Additional Criteria Reported (id ak1)",
      "question": "Which additional criteria related to natural resource use policy are described?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether additional criteria related to climate natural resource use are described. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Natural Resource Use<br>\n- Policies<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes company's targets",
        "Actions taken to achieve targets",
        "Board oversight of risks and opportunities",
        "Engagement with upstream & downstream value chain to reduce impacts described",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Natural_Resource_Use_Policy_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_ak1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407083,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Natural Resource Use Risks Management (id al)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Natural_Resource_Use_Risks_Management_id_al.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Natural Resource Use Risks Management (id al)",
      "question": "Are there natural resource use risks described in the company's non-financial statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company describes risks related to natural resource use. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Natural Resource Use<br>\n- Risks<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Description of specific risks",
        "Vague risks identification",
        "No risks identified"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Natural_Resource_Use_Risks_Management_id_al+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407094,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Natural Resource Use Risks Additional Criteria Reported (id al1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Natural_Resource_Use_Risks_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_al1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Natural Resource Use Risks Additional Criteria Reported (id al1)",
      "question": "Which additional criteria related to natural resource use risks are described?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether additional criteria related to natural resource use risks are described. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Natural Resource Use<br>\n- Risks<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "States risks for the environment",
        "Effects of risks & opportunities on the organization's business model financial planning or performance",
        "Clear management approach for the identified risks and impacts",
        "Breakdown of risks by activity or region",
        "Identification of locations that are critical to value chains including operations suppliers and markets",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Natural_Resource_Use_Risks_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_al1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407105,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Natural Resource Use Outcomes (id am)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Natural_Resource_Use_Outcomes_id_am.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Natural Resource Use Outcomes (id am)",
      "question": "Are outcomes of the company's natural resource policy described in the non-financial statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company describes outcomes related to natural resource use policy. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Natural Resource Use<br>\n- Outcomes<br>\n- Policies<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Description provided",
        "Outcomes in terms of meeting policy targets",
        "No description"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Natural_Resource_Use_Outcomes_id_am+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407116,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Natural Resource Use Outcomes Additional Criteria Reported (id am1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Natural_Resource_Use_Outcomes_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_am1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Natural Resource Use Outcomes Additional Criteria Reported (id am1)",
      "question": "Which additional criteria related to natural resources use outcomes are described?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether additional criteria related to natural resource use outcomes are described. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Natural Resource Use<br>\n- Outcomes<br>\n- Policies<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Data / KPI provided for outcomes",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Natural_Resource_Use_Outcomes_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_am1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407127,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Natural Resource Use, Water Coverage (id an)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Natural_Resource_Use_Water_Coverage_id_an.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Natural Resource Use, Water Coverage (id an)",
      "question": "How does the company provide information related to its water use?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company provides information related to its water use. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Natural Resource Use<br>\n- Water<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "KPI aggregated",
        "KPI disaggregated for country",
        "Isolated examples / Qualitative description",
        "No information provided"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Natural_Resource_Use_Water_Coverage_id_an+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407138,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Natural Resource Use, Water Reported (id an1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Natural_Resource_Use_Water_Reported_id_an1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Natural Resource Use, Water Reported (id an1)",
      "question": "Which of the following water use information does the company publish?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking which kinds of  water use information the company publishes. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Natural Resource Use<br>\n- Water<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Data includes impacts in supply chain",
        "Risks to local water stress are addressed",
        "Water consumption in water scarce and borderline areas",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Natural_Resource_Use_Water_Reported_id_an1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407149,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Polluting Discharges Coverage (id ao)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_Coverage_id_ao.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Polluting Discharges Coverage (id ao)",
      "question": "Does the company address the issue of polluting discharges in its non-financial statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company has addressed polluting discharges in its non-financial statement. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Polluting Discharges<br>\n- Policies<br>\n- Risks<br>\n- Outcomes<br>\n- KPIs<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No, argues lack of risks",
        "No, different explanation",
        "No, no explanation"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_Coverage_id_ao+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407160,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Polluting Discharges Policy (id ap)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_Policy_id_ap.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Polluting Discharges Policy (id ap)",
      "question": "Is a policy related to polluting discharges described in the company's non-financial statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company describes its polluting discharges policy. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Polluting Discharges<br>\n- Policies<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Policy is described or referenced",
        "Policy description specifies key issues and objectives",
        "No information provided"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_Policy_id_ap+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407171,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Polluting Discharges Policy Additional Criteria Reported (id ap1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_Policy_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_ap1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Polluting Discharges Policy Additional Criteria Reported (id ap1)",
      "question": "Which additional criteria related to polluting discharges policy are described?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether additional criteria related to polluting discharges policy are described. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Polluting Discharges<br>\n- Policies<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes company's targets",
        "Actions taken to achieve targets",
        "Board oversight of risks and opportunities",
        "Engagement with upstream & downstream value chain to reduce impacts described",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_Policy_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_ap1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407182,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Polluting Discharges Risks Management (id aq)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_Risks_Management_id_aq.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Polluting Discharges Risks Management (id aq)",
      "question": "Are there polluting discharges risks described in the company's non-financial statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company describes risks related to polluting discharges. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Polluting Discharges<br>\n- Risks<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Description of specific risks",
        "Vague risks identification",
        "No risks identified"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_Risks_Management_id_aq+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407193,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Polluting Discharges Risks Additional Criteria Reported (id aq1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_Risks_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_aq1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Polluting Discharges Risks Additional Criteria Reported (id aq1)",
      "question": "Which additional criteria related to polluting discharges risks are described?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether additional criteria related to polluting discharges risks are described. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Polluting Discharges<br>\n- Risks<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "States risks for the environment or human health",
        "Effects of risks & opportunities on the organization's business model financial planning or performance",
        "Clear management approach for the identified risks and impacts",
        "Breakdown of risks by activity or region",
        "Identification of locations that are critical to value chains including operations suppliers and markets",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_Risks_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_aq1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407204,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Polluting Discharges Outcomes (id ar)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_Outcomes_id_ar.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Polluting Discharges Outcomes (id ar)",
      "question": "Are outcomes of the company's polluting discharges policy described in the non-financial statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company describes outcomes related to polluting discharges policy. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Polluting Discharges<br>\n- Outcomes<br>\n- Policies<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Description provided",
        "Outcomes in terms of meeting policy targets",
        "No description"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_Outcomes_id_ar+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407215,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Polluting Discharges Outcomes Additional Criteria Reported (id ar1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_Outcomes_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_ar1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Polluting Discharges Outcomes Additional Criteria Reported (id ar1)",
      "question": "Which additional criteria related to polluting discharges outcomes are described?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether additional criteria related to polluting discharges outcomes are described. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Polluting Discharges<br>\n- Outcomes<br>\n- Policies<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Data / KPI provided for outcomes",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_Outcomes_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_ar1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407226,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Polluting Discharges to Air Coverage (id as)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_to_Air_Coverage_id_as.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Polluting Discharges to Air Coverage (id as)",
      "question": "How does the company provide information related to discharges to air (other than GHG emissions)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company provides information related to discharges to air (other than GHG emissions). This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Polluting Discharges<br>\n- Emissions<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "KPI aggregated",
        "KPI disaggregated for country",
        "Isolated examples / Qualitative description",
        "No information provided"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_to_Air_Coverage_id_as+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407237,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Polluting Discharges to Air Reported (id as1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_to_Air_Reported_id_as1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Polluting Discharges to Air Reported (id as1)",
      "question": "Which of the following air discharges (other than GHG emissions) information does the company publish?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking which air discharges (other than GHG emissions) the company publishes. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Polluting Discharges<br>\n- Emissions<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Data includes impacts in supply chain",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_to_Air_Reported_id_as1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407248,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Polluting Discharges to Water Coverage (id at)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_to_Water_Coverage_id_at.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Polluting Discharges to Water Coverage (id at)",
      "question": "How does the company provide information related to discharges to water?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company provides information related to discharges to water. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Polluting Discharges<br>\n- Water<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "KPI aggregated",
        "KPI disaggregated for country",
        "Isolated examples / Qualitative description",
        "No information provided"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_to_Water_Coverage_id_at+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407259,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Polluting Discharges to Water Reporting (id at1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_to_Water_Reporting_id_at1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Polluting Discharges to Water Reporting (id at1)",
      "question": "Which of the following water discharges information does the company publish?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking which water discharges the company publishes. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Polluting Discharges<br>\n- Water<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Data includes impacts in supply chain",
        "Data provided on spills",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_to_Water_Reporting_id_at1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407270,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Polluting Discharges to Soil Coverage (id au)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_to_Soil_Coverage_id_au.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Polluting Discharges to Soil Coverage (id au)",
      "question": "How does the company provide information related to discharges to soil?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company provides information related to discharges to soil. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Polluting Discharges<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "KPI aggregated",
        "KPI disaggregated for country",
        "Isolated examples / Qualitative description",
        "No information provided"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Soil Contamination",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_to_Soil_Coverage_id_au+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407281,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Polluting Discharges to Soil Reported (id au1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_to_Soil_Reported_id_au1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Polluting Discharges to Soil Reported (id au1)",
      "question": "Which of the following soil discharges information does the company publish?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking which soil discharges the company publishes. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Polluting Discharges<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Data includes impacts in supply chain",
        "Data provided on spills",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Soil Contamination",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Polluting_Discharges_to_Soil_Reported_id_au1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407292,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Coverage (id av)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Coverage_id_av.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Coverage (id av)",
      "question": "Does the company address the issue of biodiversity and ecosystem conservation in its non-financial statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company has addressed biodiversity and ecosystem conservation in its non-financial statement. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Biodiversity and ecosystem conservation<br>\n- Policies<br>\n- Risks<br>\n- Outcomes<br>\n- KPIs<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No, argues lack of risks",
        "No, different explanation",
        "No, no explanation"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Coverage_id_av+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407303,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Policy (id aw)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Policy_id_aw.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Policy (id aw)",
      "question": "Is a policy related to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation described in the company's non-financial statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company describes its biodiversity and ecosystem conservation policy. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Biodiversity and ecosystem conservation<br>\n- Policies<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Policy is described or referenced",
        "Policy description specifies key issues and objectives",
        "No information provided"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Policy_id_aw+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407314,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Policy Additional Criteria Reported (id aw1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Policy_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_aw1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Policy Additional Criteria Reported (id aw1)",
      "question": "Which additional criteria related to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation policy are described?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether additional criteria related to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation policy are described. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Biodiversity and ecosystem conservation<br>\n- Policies<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes company's targets",
        "Company's commitment/target to zero adverse impact on Biodiversity",
        "Actions taken to achieve the targets",
        "Boards oversight of risks and opportunities",
        "Engagement with upstream & downstream value chain to reduce impacts described",
        "(only for financial companies) Discloses how the financial institution ensures that its biodiversity-related strategy is aligned with the biodiveristy preferences of its clients",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Policy_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_aw1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407325,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Risks Management (id ax)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Risks_Management_id_ax.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Risks Management (id ax)",
      "question": "Are there biodiversity and ecosystem conservation risks described in the company's non-financial statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company describes risks related to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Biodiversity and ecosystem conservation<br>\n- Risks<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Description of specific risks",
        "Vague risks identification",
        "No risks identified"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Risks_Management_id_ax+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407336,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Risks Additional Criteria Reported (id ax1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Risks_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_ax1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Risks Additional Criteria Reported (id ax1)",
      "question": "Which additional criteria related to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation risks are described?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether additional criteria related to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation risks are described. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Biodiversity and ecosystem conservation<br>\n- Risks<br>\n<br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Includes a clear description of actual impacts",
        "Concrete operations and/or business partners associated with salient issues and impacts are identified",
        "Risks provided for long-term horizons",
        "Breakdown of risks by activity or region",
        "Clear management approach for the identified risks and impacts",
        "Identification of locations that are critical to value chains including operations suppliers and markets",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Risks_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_ax1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407347,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Outcomes (id ay)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Outcomes_id_ay.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Outcomes (id ay)",
      "question": "Are outcomes of the company's biodiversity and ecosystem conservation policy described in the non-financial statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company describes outcomes related to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation policy. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Biodiversity and ecosystem conservation<br>\n- Outcomes<br>\n- Policies<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Description provided",
        "Outcomes in terms of meeting policy targets",
        "No description"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Outcomes_id_ay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407358,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Outcomes Additional Criteria Reported (id ay1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Outcomes_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_ay1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Outcomes Additional Criteria Reported (id ay1)",
      "question": "Which additional criteria related to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation outcomes are described?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether additional criteria related to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation outcomes are described. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Biodiversity and ecosystem conservation<br>\n- Outcomes<br>\n- Policies<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Data / KPI provided for outcomes",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Outcomes_Additional_Criteria_Reported_id_ay1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407369,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Operations Coverage (id az)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Operations_Coverage_id_az.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Operations Coverage (id az)",
      "question": "Does the company report on operations in ecosystems of high ecological importance, notably internationally or nationally recognised/protected areas?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company reports on operations in ecosystems of high ecological importance, notably internationally or nationally recognised/protected areas. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Biodiversity and ecosystem conservation<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Company's policy",
        "Outcomes (KPIs or management of concrete cases)",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Operations_Coverage_id_az+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407380,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Habitat & Environment Coverage (id aaa)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Habitat_Environment_Coverage_id_aaa.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Habitat & Environment Coverage (id aaa)",
      "question": "Does the company report on habitat, landscape or environmental functions conversion (incl. deforestation)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company reports on habitat, landscape or environmental functions conversion (incl. deforestation). This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Biodiversity and ecosystem conservation<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Company's policy",
        "Outcomes (KPIs or management of concrete cases)",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Habitat_Environment_Coverage_id_aaa+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407391,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Marine Coverage (id abb)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Marine_Coverage_id_abb.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Marine Coverage (id abb)",
      "question": "Does the company report on marine ecosystems (notably fisheries and aquaculture)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company reports on marine ecosystems (notably fisheries and aquaculture). This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Biodiversity and ecosystem conservation<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Company's policy",
        "Outcomes (KPIs or management of concrete cases)",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Conservation_Marine_Coverage_id_abb+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407402,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Positive Impacts, Strategy Climate Change Mitigation & Adaptation Coverage (id ba)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Positive_Impacts_Strategy_Climate_Change_Mitigation_Adaptation_Coverage_id_ba.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Positive Impacts, Strategy Climate Change Mitigation & Adaptation Coverage (id ba)",
      "question": "Does the company publish a strategy or initiatives for products or services focusing on sustainable development opportunities for climate change mitigation and adaptation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company publishes a strategy or initiatives for products or services focusing on sustainable development opportunities for climate change mitigation and adaptation. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Positive_Impacts_Strategy_Climate_Change_Mitigation_Adaptation_Coverage_id_ba+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407413,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Positive Impacts, Strategy Climate Change Mitigation & Adaptation Reported (id ba1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Positive_Impacts_Strategy_Climate_Change_Mitigation_Adaptation_Reported_id_ba1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Positive Impacts, Strategy Climate Change Mitigation & Adaptation Reported (id ba1)",
      "question": "Which of the following criteria related to positive impacts of a company's products or services on climate change mitigation & adaptation does the company publish?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking which criteria related to positive impacts of a company's products or services on climate change mitigation & adaptation the company publishes. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Climate Change<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Turnover",
        "Capital expenditure (investment)",
        "Alignment with EU Sustainability Taxonomy",
        "Green Bonds/Green debt",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Positive_Impacts_Strategy_Climate_Change_Mitigation_Adaptation_Reported_id_ba1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407424,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Positive Impacts, Strategy Other Environmental Issues Coverage (id bb)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Positive_Impacts_Strategy_Other_Environmental_Issues_Coverage_id_bb.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Positive Impacts, Strategy Other Environmental Issues Coverage (id bb)",
      "question": "Does the company publish a strategy or initiatives for products or services focusing on sustainable development opportunities for other environmental issues (beyond climate change mitigation & adaptation)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking whether the company publishes a strategy or initiatives for products or services focusing on sustainable development opportunities for other environmental issues (beyond climate change mitigation & adaptation). This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Environment<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Positive_Impacts_Strategy_Other_Environmental_Issues_Coverage_id_bb+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6407435,
      "name": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency+Positive Impacts, Strategy Other Environmental Issues Reported (id bb1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Positive_Impacts_Strategy_Other_Environmental_Issues_Reported_id_bb1.json",
      "designer": "Alliance for Corporate Transparency",
      "title": "Positive Impacts, Strategy Other Environmental Issues Reported (id bb1)",
      "question": "Which of the following criteria related to positive impacts of a company's products or services onother environmental issues (beyond climate change mitigation & adaptation) does the company publish?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric belongs to the research implemented by Frank Bold, which analysed the disclosures of European companies pursuant to the rules introduced by the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The research is part of the [[https://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]] project, an initiative gathering leading NGOs to assess and monitor companies' sustainability reporting in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve and develop the legal framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive lays down the rules on the disclosure of non-financial information by large companies based in the European Union. The Directive came into force for company reporting in 2018 and applies to large public-interest companies with more than 500 employees,covering approximately 6,000 companies across the EU. Under the Directive, companies have to publish reports on the policies they implement on:<br>\n<br>\n- environmental protection<br>\n- social responsibility and treatment of employees<br>\n- respect for human rights<br>\n- anti-corruption and bribery<br>\n- diversity on company boards (in terms of age, gender, educational and professional background) <br>\n<br>\nA proposal to reform the legislation is expected to be presented in early 2021 in order to improve the quality, consistency and reliability of corporate disclosure. This reform is central to the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Finance agenda. <br>\n<br>\nFor more information:<br>\n<br>\n[[http://www.allianceforcorporatetransparency.org/|Alliance for Corporate Transparency]]<br>\n<br>\n[[https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/non-financial-reporting_en|European Commission]]",
      "methodology": "This metric is asking which criteria related to positive impacts of a company's products or services on other environmental issues (beyond climate change mitigation & adaptation) the company publishes. This may be found within an annual report, integrated report and/or sustainability report.<br>\n<br>\nKeywords and Search Terms<br>\n- Environment<br>\n <br>\nWhere possible, page numbers are included in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where information was found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Turnover",
        "Capital expenditure (investment)",
        "Alignment with EU Sustainability Taxonomy",
        "Green Bonds/Green debt",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Alliance_for_Corporate_Transparency+Positive_Impacts_Strategy_Other_Environmental_Issues_Reported_id_bb1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519046,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Zero emissions commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_emissions_commitment.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Zero emissions commitment",
      "question": "Does the company commit to reaching zero emissions before 2030?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This question is in line with the scientific basis for the 2015 Paris Agreement, which establishes the limit of global warming below 1.5ºC above pre-industrial levels is the limit to reduce the worst impact on our planet and its inhabitants especially in frontline communities, which will be the most affected. That is why this agreement sets the goal of achieving a net zero level of emissions by 2050.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We will assign a \"YES\" if the company declares to establish a goal of \"zero emissions\" of greenhouse gases (GHG) for 2030 as a deadline.</p>\r\n<p>We will assign a \"NO\" if:</p>\r\n<p>• We did not find statements in this regard in any of the reports.</p>\r\n<p>• The time goal is greater than 2030</p>\r\n<p>• No deadline is set</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>This information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:</p>\r\n<p>• Annual memory</p>\r\n<p>• Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p>\r\n<p>• Sustainability Report</p>\r\n<p>• Environmental Report</p>\r\n<p>• Report on Carbon Footprint</p>\r\n<p>• Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Zero emissions commitment+Luis Leyton"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_emissions_commitment+Luis_Leyton.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_emissions_commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519130,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Commitment -30% of GHG emissions in 5 years",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Commitment_30_of_GHG_emissions_in_5_years.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Commitment -30% of GHG emissions in 5 years",
      "question": "La empresa ha establecido objetivos cuantitativos de reducción y/o compensación de sus propias emisiones (alcance 1 y 2) en al menos un 30% en 5 años versus año base.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta pregunta está en línea con la base científica del Acuerdo de París de 2015, que establece que el límite de calentamiento global por debajo de 1,5ºC por encima de los niveles preindustriales es el límite para reducir el peor impacto en nuestro planeta y sus habitantes especialmente en las comunidades de primera línea, que será el más afectado.</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">El objetivo de reducción del 30% en los próximos 5 años con respecto al año base es el compromiso cuantitativo y temporal representativo de las \"mejores prácticas\" del sector retail actualmente en España. </span><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Según los últimos informes corporativos publicados a finales de 2020, al menos 2 de las empresas evaluadas declararon este objetivo</span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Responderemos \"SÍ\" si la empresa declara establecer una meta para reducir sus emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero (GEI) de al menos un 30% en los próximos 5 años.</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-bookmark: _olk_signature;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Responderemos \"NO\" si:</span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-bookmark: _olk_signature;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">• No encontramos declaraciones al respecto en ninguno de los informes.</span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">• Las declaraciones se refieren a una reducción de menos del 30%</span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-bookmark: _olk_signature;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">• El objetivo de tiempo es superior a 5 años </span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-bookmark: _olk_signature;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">• No se fija ninguna fecha límite</span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-bookmark: _olk_signature;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-bookmark: _olk_signature;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta información se puede encontrar en cualquiera de los siguientes informes publicados en su sitio web:</span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-bookmark: _olk_signature;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">• Memoria anual</span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-bookmark: _olk_signature;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">• Informe de Responsabilidad Social Corporativa</span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-bookmark: _olk_signature;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">• Reporte de Sostenibilidad</span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-bookmark: _olk_signature;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">• Informe medioambiental</span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-bookmark: _olk_signature;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">• Informe de Huella de Carbono</span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"mso-bookmark: _olk_signature;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">• Declaración de información no financiera (EINF)</span></span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Commitment -30% of GHG emissions in 5 years+Luis Leyton"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Commitment_30_of_GHG_emissions_in_5_years+Luis_Leyton.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Commitment_30_of_GHG_emissions_in_5_years+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519142,
      "name": "Grupo de Investigación Eticinsum+Objetivo de reducción de emisiones un 25%",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Grupo_de_Investigación_Eticinsum+Objetivo_de_reducción_de_emisiones_un_25.json",
      "designer": "Grupo de Investigación Eticinsum",
      "title": "Objetivo de reducción de emisiones un 25%",
      "question": "La empresa ha establecido objetivos cuantitativos de reducción y/o compensación de sus propias emisiones (alcance 1 y 2) en al menos un 25% en 5 años versus año base.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"color: #666666; font-family: docs-Calibri; font-size: 22px; white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: #eef3ec;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta pregunta está en liínea con la base científica de cara al Acuerdo de París de 2015, que establece el límite del calentamiento global por debajo de los 1,5ºC sobre los niveles preindustriales es el límite para reducir el peor impacto sobre nuestro planeta y sus habitantes , especialmente en las comunidades de primera línea, que serán las más afectadas. </span></span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #666666; font-family: docs-Calibri; font-size: 22px; white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: #eef3ec;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">El objetivo de reducción de un 25% en los próximos 5 años con respecto al año base es el que hemos observado como segundo nivel de compromiso en el sector retail actualmente en España, tras el objetivo de reducción de un 40% que es el referente como mejor práctica. </span></span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #666666; font-family: docs-Calibri; font-size: 22px; white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: #eef3ec;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"> </span></span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"color: #666666; font-family: docs-Calibri; font-size: 18px; white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: #eef3ec; vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Se asignará un SI cuando este objetivo se haya establecido al menos en los últimos 3 años y se haga mención a él en alguno de los informes corporativos del año evaluado. </span></span></span><span style=\"color: #666666; font-family: docs-Calibri; font-size: 18px; white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: #eef3ec; vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Se asignará también un SI cuando la empresa ya haya realizado dicha reducción de un 25% de sus emisiones en los últimos 3 años (Ver caso de ECI que ha conseguido reducir drasticamente sus emisiones un 70% desde el año 2017 gracias a la compra de energia renovable)</span></span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Grupo de Investigación Eticinsum+Objetivo de reducción de emisiones un 25%+Luis Leyton"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Grupo_de_Investigación_Eticinsum+Objetivo_de_reducción_de_emisiones_un_25+Luis_Leyton.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Grupo_de_Investigación_Eticinsum+Objetivo_de_reducción_de_emisiones_un_25+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519153,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+GHG Emission reduction target achieved",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+GHG_Emission_reduction_target_achieved.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "GHG Emission reduction target achieved",
      "question": "The company has met its emission reduction targets established in previous years or shows its good evolution to achieve them",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This question constitutes the effective achievement of the objectives established by the company. It will be the question to watch in the coming years in correspondence with the currently declared temporary objectives. It is useless to make declarations of commitments to be achieved within 5 years, for example if they are not fulfilled by that date</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We will assign a \"YES\" if:</p>\r\n<p>• The company clearly communicates in some of its reports that it has already reached its main objective related to a significant reduction (at least 10%) of its emissions announced in previous years.</p>\r\n<p>• The company does not report having reached any reduction target set in previous years, but we verify that it has still reduced its emissions by at least 30% in the last 5 years or in relation to its base year (it has been assigned a YES in the metric \"Reduction of own GHG emissions by 30%\")</p>\r\n<p>We will assign a \"NO\" if:</p>\r\n<p>• We did not find statements in this regard in any of the reports</p>\r\n<p>• The company declares that it has met its emission reduction target, but this is less than 10%</p>\r\n<p>• No reduction target has been set in the previous year.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>This information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:</p>\r\n<p>• Annual memory</p>\r\n<p>• Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p>\r\n<p>• Sustainability Report</p>\r\n<p>• Environmental Report</p>\r\n<p>• Report on Carbon Footprint</p>\r\n<p>• Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+GHG Emission reduction target achieved+Luis Leyton"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+GHG_Emission_reduction_target_achieved+Luis_Leyton.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+GHG_Emission_reduction_target_achieved+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519240,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Measures to reduce GHG emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_GHG_emissions.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Measures to reduce GHG emissions",
      "question": "La empresa ha establecido 3 o más medidas \"relevantes\" de reducción y/o compensación de sus propias emisiones ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">We consider relevant measures those of great impact in order to reduce GHGs, which are associated with the main sources of emissions of the sector to which the company belongs and which serve as an example to other competitors</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We value with a \"YES\" if the company has implemented at least 3 significant measures in terms of reducing emissions during the year of its reports and they are clearly detailed in any of its annual reports. Some examples of relevant actions are:</p>\r\n<p>- Energy consumption from energies 100% of renewable origin.</p>\r\n<p>- Self-consumption of renewable energy through photovoltaic installations</p>\r\n<p>- Low emission transport such as electric</p>\r\n<p>- Logistics efficiency measures (route optimization, fleet with Euro V rating and higher, ..)</p>\r\n<p>-Reduction of refrigerant gas leaks (leak detectors,</p>\r\n<p>-Improvement of the efficiency of the refrigeration systems (better insulation, optimization of the temperature, ..)</p>\r\n<p>-Concrete energy efficiency measures (Installation of home automation, LED lights</p>\r\n<p>- ISO 50001 Energy Efficiency Certification</p>\r\n<p>-Cold chain certified by AENOR</p>\r\n<p>-Compensation of emissions through investment in projects</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>We will assign a \"NO\" if:</p>\r\n<p>• We did not find statements in this regard in any of the reports.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif; mso-ascii-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-fareast; mso-hansi-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language: ES; mso-fareast-language: ES; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;\">• The company only communicates less than 3 relevant measures</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14.6667px;\">This information can be found in any of the following reports published on its website:</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14.6667px;\">• Annual memory</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14.6667px;\">• Corporate Social Responsibility Report</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14.6667px;\">• Sustainability Report</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14.6667px;\">• Environmental Report</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14.6667px;\">• Report on Carbon Footprint</span></span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14.6667px;\">• Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)</span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Use of Carbon Offsets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Measures to reduce GHG emissions+Luis Leyton"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_GHG_emissions+Luis_Leyton.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_GHG_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519277,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Commitment -30% of GHG emissions in 5 years+Luis Leyton",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Commitment_30_of_GHG_emissions_in_5_years+Luis_Leyton.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Commitment -30% of GHG emissions in 5 years",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Unknown\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_1_CO2_Emission_reduction_objectives_and_actions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Commitment_30_of_GHG_emissions_in_5_years+Luis_Leyton+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519289,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Zero emissions commitment+Luis Leyton",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_emissions_commitment+Luis_Leyton.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Zero emissions commitment",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Unknown\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_1_CO2_Emission_reduction_objectives_and_actions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_emissions_commitment+Luis_Leyton+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519292,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Measures to reduce GHG emissions+Luis Leyton",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_GHG_emissions+Luis_Leyton.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Measures to reduce GHG emissions",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Use of Carbon Offsets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Unknown\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_1_CO2_Emission_reduction_objectives_and_actions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_GHG_emissions+Luis_Leyton+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519295,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+GHG Emission reduction target achieved+Luis Leyton",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+GHG_Emission_reduction_target_achieved+Luis_Leyton.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "GHG Emission reduction target achieved",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Unknown\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_1_CO2_Emission_reduction_objectives_and_actions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+GHG_Emission_reduction_target_achieved+Luis_Leyton+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519298,
      "name": "Grupo de Investigación Eticinsum+Objetivo de reducción de emisiones un 25%+Luis Leyton",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Grupo_de_Investigación_Eticinsum+Objetivo_de_reducción_de_emisiones_un_25+Luis_Leyton.json",
      "designer": "Grupo de Investigación Eticinsum",
      "title": "Objetivo de reducción de emisiones un 25%",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Grupo_de_Investigación_Eticinsum+Objetivo_de_reducción_de_emisiones_un_25+Luis_Leyton+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519871,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+1.1 CO2 Emission reduction objectives and actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_1_CO2_Emission_reduction_objectives_and_actions.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "1.1 CO2 Emission reduction objectives and actions",
      "question": "Does the company establish specific initiatives and objectives in order to reduce its GHG emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of the Eticonsum research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector in environmental, social and ethical matters.</p>\r\n<p>Eticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialized in corporate performance ESG (environment, social, governance) applied to consumer knowledge.</p>\r\n<p>We research and analyze the ethical market of the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values, and companies to compete on ethical reputation.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>With this metric, we evaluate the objectives established by the company in terms of reducing and / or offsetting its carbon footprint with specific and quantified objectives and measures. In this sense and throughout our ratings, in those indicators that include the evaluation of objectives, we value that these are SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and temporary), not simple declarations of intent without specification or deadlines.</p>\r\n<p>In the event that a company has already made significant efforts in terms of reduction and is at a time when these measures are exhausted, we value emissions compensation as a valid alternative and so on until reaching the ideal goal that would be to become one \" zero emissions company \".</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Use of Carbon Offsets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6519277",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6519922",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6519295",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6534869",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6519289",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6519292",
          "weight": "16.67"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_Climate_Change.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_1_CO2_Emission_reduction_objectives_and_actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519894,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Exhaustive and disaggregated publication of CO2 emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Exhaustive_and_disaggregated_publication_of_CO2_emissions.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Exhaustive and disaggregated publication of CO2 emissions",
      "question": "The company measures and publishes its scope 1 and 2 emissions in a comprehensive and itemized manner",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:</p>\r\n<p>• Scope 1 and 2 emissions are clearly published separately by adding the breakdown of the sources of the emissions included in each type</p>\r\n<p>• Scope 1 and 2 emissions are clearly published separately and although their components are not broken down, at least it is clearly indicated which sources of emissions include the data for each type of scope.</p>\r\n<p> In the case of supermarkets, it is normal for Scope 1 to mainly include emissions from their refrigerant gases and the fuel for their heating and their own transport. Scope 2 emissions would correspond fundamentally to electricity consumption.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>We will assign a \"NO\" if:</p>\r\n<p>• Relevant sources are omitted within each type of emissions, such as that corresponding to refrigerant gases or emissions from own transport within scope 1.</p>\r\n<p>• The company does not classify its emissions according to the Scope 1,2 and 3 names as stipulated in the main GRI, CPD standards or the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol. We require this nomenclature for a better interpretation, homogenization and comparability of the data.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>This information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:</p>\r\n<p>• Annual memory</p>\r\n<p>• Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p>\r\n<p>• Sustainability Report</p>\r\n<p>• Environmental Report</p>\r\n<p>• Report on Carbon Footprint</p>\r\n<p>• Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Exhaustive and disaggregated publication of CO2 emissions+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Exhaustive_and_disaggregated_publication_of_CO2_emissions+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Exhaustive_and_disaggregated_publication_of_CO2_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519900,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Exhaustive and disaggregated publication of CO2 emissions+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Exhaustive_and_disaggregated_publication_of_CO2_emissions+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Exhaustive and disaggregated publication of CO2 emissions",
      "question": "What is the score of the company for this indicatot?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Unknown\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_2_Publication_of_scope_1_2_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Exhaustive_and_disaggregated_publication_of_CO2_emissions+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519905,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Independent verification of published GHG emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Independent_verification_of_published_GHG_emissions.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Independent verification of published GHG emissions",
      "question": "Is the published GHG emission data subject to independent external verification ?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Independent verification of published GHG emissions+Luis Leyton"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Independent_verification_of_published_GHG_emissions+Luis_Leyton.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Independent_verification_of_published_GHG_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519911,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Independent verification of published GHG emissions+Luis Leyton",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Independent_verification_of_published_GHG_emissions+Luis_Leyton.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Independent verification of published GHG emissions",
      "question": "What is the score of the company for this indicator?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Unknown\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_2_Publication_of_scope_1_2_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Independent_verification_of_published_GHG_emissions+Luis_Leyton+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519916,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Measures to reduce emissions of refrigerant gas",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_emissions_of_refrigerant_gas.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Measures to reduce emissions of refrigerant gas",
      "question": "Does the company establish important measures to reduce HFC refrigerant gas emissions ?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>HFCs are hydrofluorocarbon gases with high global warming potential and long atmospheric permanence. In Europe, the F-Gas regulation, which came into force in 2015, established that they should be phased out by 2030, but illegal imports make it difficult to achieve the 80% reduction target by that date. The environmental impact of these gases is represented in kg of CO2 emitted. For example, each kilo of R-134A gas emitted is equivalent to 1,200 tonnes of CO2 emitted into the atmosphere, and 1 kg of R-404 is equivalent to about 4,000 tonnes of CO2, according to industry sources.  </p>\r\n<p>These are also present in homes, offices and cars, but, as ECODES points out, it is the large-scale distribution sector, that of supermarkets, which has to make the greatest efforts in the transition to climate-friendly technologies. </p>\r\n<p>We demand that supermarkets at least make efforts to invest in and commit to more environmentally friendly alternatives such as natural refrigerants, adopt technologies with low warming power (Global warming power GWP) or at least reduce refrigerant leakage, and gradually reduce HFCs in line with the EIA: </p>\r\n<p>In October 2014, the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) published its sixth and latest report called Chilling Facts: Closing the Doors on HFCs. in which it recommended that retailers should:</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>1. commit to installing only HFC-free systems in all new shops and renovations, statewide, including their food transportation systems and international operations;</p>\r\n<p>2. Commit to a total phase-out by 2025 at the latest (the UK Government will ban the use of HFCs with a GWP above 2500 from 2020).</p>\r\n<p>3. Install doors on all chiller and freezer units as standard.</p>\r\n<p>4. Phase out HFCs with a GWP above 2500 in existing equipment as a priority. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We will assign a \"YES\" to this question if:</p>\r\n<p>• The company publishes the weight of its emissions derived from refrigerant gases</p>\r\n<p>OR:</p>\r\n<p>• The company is a transnational group and publishes at least its emissions derived from refrigerant gases at the group level</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>This information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>• Annual memory</p>\r\n<p>• Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p>\r\n<p>• Sustainability Report</p>\r\n<p>• Environmental Report</p>\r\n<p>• Report on Carbon Footprint</p>\r\n<p>• Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Measures to reduce emissions of refrigerant gas+Luis Leyton"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_emissions_of_refrigerant_gas+Luis_Leyton.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_emissions_of_refrigerant_gas+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519922,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Measures to reduce emissions of refrigerant gas+Luis Leyton",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_emissions_of_refrigerant_gas+Luis_Leyton.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Measures to reduce emissions of refrigerant gas",
      "question": "What is the score of the company for this indicator?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Unknown\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_1_CO2_Emission_reduction_objectives_and_actions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_emissions_of_refrigerant_gas+Luis_Leyton+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519927,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of refrigerant gas emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_refrigerant_gas_emissions.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of refrigerant gas emissions",
      "question": "Does the company publish its HFC refrigerant gas emissions ?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of refrigerant gas emissions+Luis Leyton"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_refrigerant_gas_emissions+Luis_Leyton.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_refrigerant_gas_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519933,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of refrigerant gas emissions+Luis Leyton",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_refrigerant_gas_emissions+Luis_Leyton.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of refrigerant gas emissions",
      "question": "What is the score of the company for this indicator ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Unknown\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_2_Publication_of_scope_1_2_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_refrigerant_gas_emissions+Luis_Leyton+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519938,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of scope 1 and 2 emissions.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_scope_1_and_2_emissions.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of scope 1 and 2 emissions.",
      "question": "Does the company measure and publish its direct emissions (scope 1 and 2) ?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of scope 1 and 2 emissions.+Luis Leyton"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_scope_1_and_2_emissions+Luis_Leyton.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_scope_1_and_2_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6519944,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of scope 1 and 2 emissions.+Luis Leyton",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_scope_1_and_2_emissions+Luis_Leyton.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of scope 1 and 2 emissions.",
      "question": "What is the score of the company for this indicator?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Unknown\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_2_Publication_of_scope_1_2_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_scope_1_and_2_emissions+Luis_Leyton+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6534862,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Commitment -10% of GHG emissions in 5 years",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Commitment_10_of_GHG_emissions_in_5_years.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Commitment -10% of GHG emissions in 5 years",
      "question": "Does the company commit to reducing their GHG emissions by 10%  in 5 years vs. baseline?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This question is in line with the scientific basis for the 2015 Paris Agreement, which establishes the limit of global warming below 1.5ºC above pre-industrial levels is the limit to reduce the worst impact on our planet and its inhabitants especially in frontline communities, which will be the most affected. That is why this agreement sets the goal of achieving a net zero level of emissions by 2050.</p>\r\n<p>The objective of reduction of 10% in the next 5 years required in this question is an unambitious quantitative and temporary commitment, but feel a minimum commitment on the part of the companies in this regard.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We will answer \"YES\" if the company declares to establish a goal to reduce its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of at least 10% in the next 5 years.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>We will answer \"NO\" if:</p>\r\n<p>• We did not find statements in this regard in any of the reports.</p>\r\n<p>• The declarations refer to a reduction of less than 10%</p>\r\n<p>• The time objective is greater than 5 years</p>\r\n<p>• No deadline is set</p>\r\n<p>                  </p>\r\n<p>This information can be found in any of the following reports published on its website:</p>\r\n<p>• Annual memory</p>\r\n<p>• Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p>\r\n<p>• Sustainability Report</p>\r\n<p>• Environmental Report</p>\r\n<p>• Report on Carbon Footprint</p>\r\n<p>• Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Commitment -10% of GHG emissions in 5 years+Luis Leyton"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Commitment_10_of_GHG_emissions_in_5_years+Luis_Leyton.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Commitment_10_of_GHG_emissions_in_5_years+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6534869,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Commitment -10% of GHG emissions in 5 years+Luis Leyton",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Commitment_10_of_GHG_emissions_in_5_years+Luis_Leyton.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Commitment -10% of GHG emissions in 5 years",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>This question is in line with the scientific basis for the 2015 Paris Agreement, which establishes the limit of global warming below 1.5ºC above pre-industrial levels is the limit to reduce the worst impact on our planet and its inhabitants especially in frontline communities, which will be the most affected. That is why this agreement sets the goal of achieving a net zero level of emissions by 2050.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>The objective of reduction of 10% in the next 5 years required in this question is an unambitious quantitative and temporary commitment, but feel a minimum commitment on the part of the companies in this regard.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Unknown\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_1_CO2_Emission_reduction_objectives_and_actions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Commitment_10_of_GHG_emissions_in_5_years+Luis_Leyton+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6619083,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Income Tax Expense Benefit",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Income_Tax_Expense_Benefit.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Income Tax Expense Benefit",
      "question": "How much tax did the company pay?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Amount of current income tax expense (benefit) and deferred income tax expense (benefit) pertaining to continuing operations.</p>",
      "methodology": "<div>\r\n<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p>\r\n<p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>\r\n</div>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 59592,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 5599,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Income_Tax_Expense_Benefit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6825352,
      "name": "Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions publication exhaustively and disaggregated+Eticonsum Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication_exhaustively_and_disaggregated+Eticonsum_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Eticonsum",
      "title": "Scope 3 emissions publication exhaustively and disaggregated",
      "question": "The company publishes its indirect scope 3 emissions exhaustively and disaggregated",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : 1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 4<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": "The most frequent sources of Scope 3 GHG emissions in the case of supermarkets are ...\":<br>\n<br>\n- Fuel consumption in road and air travel for business trips<br>\n- Production of diesel consumed in road transport in logistics<br>\n- Diesel from work trips (from well to tank) <br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines<br>\n<br>\nAnswer YES if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes its Scope 3 emissions data as comprehensively as possible and broken down by each of the main sources of emissions. We require at least 2 source categories using the above examples as a basis.<br>\n<br>\n- At least the company specifies the sources of emissions included in the computation.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-financial information statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication_exhaustively_and_disaggregated+Eticonsum_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6825364,
      "name": "Eticonsum+Scope 3 GHG emission reduction objective+Eticonsum Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Scope_3_GHG_emission_reduction_objective+Eticonsum_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Eticonsum",
      "title": "Scope 3 GHG emission reduction objective",
      "question": "The company establishes objectives for reducing and / or offsetting its scope 3 emissions.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 3 \"\"<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": "Answer YES if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company sets a reduction target for at least some of its scope 3 emissions (see listing question above). For now in this question we do not require % reduction or time horizon.<br>\n<br>\n-The company has already reduced or offset its Scope 3 emissions significantly in the last 2 years (you have scored YES in the question \"Reduction or offset of Scope 3 emissions vs. previous year\").<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-financial information statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Use of Carbon Offsets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Scope_3_GHG_emission_reduction_objective+Eticonsum_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6825376,
      "name": "Eticonsum+Measures to reduce scope 3 emissions+Eticonsum Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_scope_3_emissions+Eticonsum_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Eticonsum",
      "title": "Measures to reduce scope 3 emissions",
      "question": "The company declares measures to facilitate or encourage the use of tools to minimize emissions among its employees and collaborators.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 3 \"\"<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": "Answer YES if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company establishes or encourages initiatives in order to reduce scope 3 emissions produced by its collaborators while traveling to work. Some examples can be teleworking, videoconferencing, cycling, carsharing, electric company cars, aids that involve public transport, etc ...<br>\nThese actions must be clearly detailed in any of the reports published by the company<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-financial information statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_scope_3_emissions+Eticonsum_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6825388,
      "name": "Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions publication+Eticonsum Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication+Eticonsum_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Eticonsum",
      "title": "Scope 3 emissions publication",
      "question": "The company publishes the indirect emissions of scope 3.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 3 \"\"<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": "We assess with a YES if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes some data on scope 3 emissions, although specific emission sources are not specified. We value the completeness and breakdown in the first question \"\" Comprehensive and disaggregated publication of Scope 3 emissions \"<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-financial information statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication+Eticonsum_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6825400,
      "name": "Eticonsum+Small supermarket (< 1000m2)+Eticonsum Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Small_supermarket_1000m2+Eticonsum_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Eticonsum",
      "title": "Small supermarket (< 1000m2)",
      "question": "The company's establishments are of a \"proximity\" format (super small < 1000m2).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The \"proximity supermarket\" format, both medium-sized supermarkets (smaller than 2500m2), but especially small supermarkets (smaller than 1000m), have the lowest environmental impact due to their capacity to reduce gas emissions into the atmosphere at all stages of the food distribution process: from the collection of products at their point of origin and their reception in the shop to customer access to the shop and home delivery.  <br>\nThese shops are often located in urban centres in close proximity to consumers' homes and workplaces, which means that the vast majority of customers shop on foot (85% if we also include large supermarkets between 2501 and 5000m2). <br>\nWe relate this characteristic of supermarkets to their Scope 3 emissions linked to the impact of their customers' travel and goods transport flows.",
      "methodology": "We value with a YES when the chain's store network (GROUP) corresponds to the super small format (  5000m2)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Small_supermarket_1000m2+Eticonsum_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6825412,
      "name": "Eticonsum+Small or medium supermarket (< 2500m2)+Eticonsum Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Small_or_medium_supermarket_2500m2+Eticonsum_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Eticonsum",
      "title": "Small or medium supermarket (< 2500m2)",
      "question": "The company's establishments are of a \"proximity\" format (super small or medium < 2500m2).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The \"proximity supermarket\" format, both medium-sized supers (under 2500m2), but especially small supermarkets (under 1000m), are shown to have the lowest environmental impact due to their ability to reduce atmospheric emissions at all stages of the food distribution process: from the collection of products at their point of origin and their reception in the shop to customer access to the shop and delivery to the customer's home.  <br>\nThese shops are often located in urban centres in close proximity to consumers' homes and workplaces, which means that the vast majority of customers shop on foot (85% if we also include large supermarkets between 2501 and 5000m2). <br>\nWe relate this characteristic of supermarkets to their Scope 3 emissions linked to the impact of their customers' travel and goods transport flows.<br>\n We value with a YES when the chain's (GROUP's) shop network corresponds to the super small format (< 1000m2) in most of its shops and does not include Hypermarkets (> 5000m2).",
      "methodology": "We value with a YES when the chain's network of stores corresponds to the super small format (<1000m2) or super medium format (<2500m2) mostly and does not include hypermarkets. Example Mercadona, which does not have hypermarkets and has mostly medium-sized stores, although it has quite a few large supermarkets (from 2501 to 4999m2)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Small_or_medium_supermarket_2500m2+Eticonsum_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6825478,
      "name": "Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions publication exhaustively and disaggregated+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication_exhaustively_and_disaggregated+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Eticonsum",
      "title": "Scope 3 emissions publication exhaustively and disaggregated",
      "question": "The company publishes its indirect scope 3 emissions exhaustively and disaggregated",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : 1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 4<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": "The most frequent sources of Scope 3 GHG emissions in the case of supermarkets are ...\":<br>\n<br>\n- Fuel consumption in road and air travel for business trips<br>\n- Production of diesel consumed in road transport in logistics<br>\n- Diesel from work trips (from well to tank) <br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines<br>\n<br>\nAnswer YES if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes its Scope 3 emissions data as comprehensively as possible and broken down by each of the main sources of emissions. We require at least 2 source categories using the above examples as a basis.<br>\n<br>\n- At least the company specifies the sources of emissions included in the computation.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-financial information statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication_exhaustively_and_disaggregated+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6825488,
      "name": "Eticonsum+Scope 3 GHG emission reduction objective+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Scope_3_GHG_emission_reduction_objective+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Eticonsum",
      "title": "Scope 3 GHG emission reduction objective",
      "question": "The company establishes objectives for reducing and / or offsetting its scope 3 emissions.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 3 \"\"<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": "Answer YES if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company sets a reduction target for at least some of its scope 3 emissions (see listing question above). For now in this question we do not require % reduction or time horizon.<br>\n<br>\n-The company has already reduced or offset its Scope 3 emissions significantly in the last 2 years (you have scored YES in the question \"Reduction or offset of Scope 3 emissions vs. previous year\").<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-financial information statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Use of Carbon Offsets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Scope_3_GHG_emission_reduction_objective+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6825498,
      "name": "Eticonsum+Measures to reduce scope 3 emissions+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_scope_3_emissions+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Eticonsum",
      "title": "Measures to reduce scope 3 emissions",
      "question": "The company declares measures to facilitate or encourage the use of tools to minimize emissions among its employees and collaborators.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 3 \"\"<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": "Answer YES if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company establishes or encourages initiatives in order to reduce scope 3 emissions produced by its collaborators while traveling to work. Some examples can be teleworking, videoconferencing, cycling, carsharing, electric company cars, aids that involve public transport, etc ...<br>\nThese actions must be clearly detailed in any of the reports published by the company<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-financial information statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_scope_3_emissions+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6825508,
      "name": "Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions publication+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Eticonsum",
      "title": "Scope 3 emissions publication",
      "question": "The company publishes the indirect emissions of scope 3.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 3 \"\"<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": "We assess with a YES if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes some data on scope 3 emissions, although specific emission sources are not specified. We value the completeness and breakdown in the first question \"\" Comprehensive and disaggregated publication of Scope 3 emissions \"<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-financial information statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6825518,
      "name": "Eticonsum+Small supermarket (< 1000m2)+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Small_supermarket_1000m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Eticonsum",
      "title": "Small supermarket (< 1000m2)",
      "question": "The company's establishments are of a \"proximity\" format (super small < 1000m2).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The \"proximity supermarket\" format, both medium-sized supermarkets (smaller than 2500m2), but especially small supermarkets (smaller than 1000m), have the lowest environmental impact due to their capacity to reduce gas emissions into the atmosphere at all stages of the food distribution process: from the collection of products at their point of origin and their reception in the shop to customer access to the shop and home delivery.  <br>\nThese shops are often located in urban centres in close proximity to consumers' homes and workplaces, which means that the vast majority of customers shop on foot (85% if we also include large supermarkets between 2501 and 5000m2). <br>\nWe relate this characteristic of supermarkets to their Scope 3 emissions linked to the impact of their customers' travel and goods transport flows.",
      "methodology": "We value with a YES when the chain's store network (GROUP) corresponds to the super small format (  5000m2)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Small_supermarket_1000m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6825528,
      "name": "Eticonsum+Small or medium supermarket (< 2500m2)+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Small_or_medium_supermarket_2500m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Eticonsum",
      "title": "Small or medium supermarket (< 2500m2)",
      "question": "The company's establishments are of a \"proximity\" format (super small or medium < 2500m2).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The \"proximity supermarket\" format, both medium-sized supers (under 2500m2), but especially small supermarkets (under 1000m), are shown to have the lowest environmental impact due to their ability to reduce atmospheric emissions at all stages of the food distribution process: from the collection of products at their point of origin and their reception in the shop to customer access to the shop and delivery to the customer's home.  <br>\nThese shops are often located in urban centres in close proximity to consumers' homes and workplaces, which means that the vast majority of customers shop on foot (85% if we also include large supermarkets between 2501 and 5000m2). <br>\nWe relate this characteristic of supermarkets to their Scope 3 emissions linked to the impact of their customers' travel and goods transport flows.<br>\n We value with a YES when the chain's (GROUP's) shop network corresponds to the super small format (< 1000m2) in most of its shops and does not include Hypermarkets (> 5000m2).",
      "methodology": "We value with a YES when the chain's network of stores corresponds to the super small format (<1000m2) or super medium format (<2500m2) mostly and does not include hypermarkets. Example Mercadona, which does not have hypermarkets and has mostly medium-sized stores, although it has quite a few large supermarkets (from 2501 to 4999m2)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Eticonsum+Small_or_medium_supermarket_2500m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6825569,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions publication exhaustively and disaggregated",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication_exhaustively_and_disaggregated.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Scope 3 emissions publication exhaustively and disaggregated",
      "question": "The company publishes its indirect scope 3 emissions exhaustively and disaggregated",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : 1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 4<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": "The most frequent sources of Scope 3 GHG emissions in the case of supermarkets are ...\":<br>\n<br>\n- Fuel consumption in road and air travel for business trips<br>\n- Production of diesel consumed in road transport in logistics<br>\n- Diesel from work trips (from well to tank) <br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines<br>\n<br>\nAnswer YES if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes its Scope 3 emissions data as comprehensively as possible and broken down by each of the main sources of emissions. We require at least 2 source categories using the above examples as a basis.<br>\n<br>\n- At least the company specifies the sources of emissions included in the computation.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-financial information statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions publication exhaustively and disaggregated+Eticonsum",
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions publication exhaustively and disaggregated+Research Group Eticonsum",
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions publication exhaustively and disaggregated+Luis Leyton"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication_exhaustively_and_disaggregated+Eticonsum.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication_exhaustively_and_disaggregated+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication_exhaustively_and_disaggregated+Luis_Leyton.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication_exhaustively_and_disaggregated+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6825579,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Scope 3 emission reduction objective",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emission_reduction_objective.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Scope 3 emission reduction objective",
      "question": "The company establishes objectives for reducing and / or offsetting its scope 3 emissions.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 3 \"\"<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": "<p>Answer YES if:<br><br>- The company sets a reduction target for at least some of its scope 3 emissions (see listing question above). For now in this question we do not require % reduction or time horizon.<br>Or:<br>-The company has already reduced or offset its Scope 3 emissions significantly in the last 2 years (you have scored YES in the question \"Reduction or offset of Scope 3 emissions vs. previous year\").<br><br>This information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br><br>- Annual memory<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>- Sustainability Report<br>- Environmental Report<br>- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>- Non-financial information statement (EINF)</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Scope 3 emission reduction objective+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emission_reduction_objective+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emission_reduction_objective+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6825589,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Measures to reduce scope 3 emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_scope_3_emissions.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Measures to reduce scope 3 emissions",
      "question": "The company declares measures to facilitate or encourage the use of tools to minimize emissions among its employees and collaborators.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 3 \"\"<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": "Answer YES if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company establishes or encourages initiatives in order to reduce scope 3 emissions produced by its collaborators while traveling to work. Some examples can be teleworking, videoconferencing, cycling, carsharing, electric company cars, aids that involve public transport, etc ...<br>\nThese actions must be clearly detailed in any of the reports published by the company<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-financial information statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Measures to reduce scope 3 emissions+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_scope_3_emissions+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_scope_3_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6825599,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions publication",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Scope 3 emissions publication",
      "question": "The company publishes the indirect emissions of scope 3.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 3 \"\"<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": "We assess with a YES if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes some data on scope 3 emissions, although specific emission sources are not specified. We value the completeness and breakdown in the first question \"\" Comprehensive and disaggregated publication of Scope 3 emissions \"<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-financial information statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions publication+Research Group Eticonsum",
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions publication+Luis Leyton"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication+Luis_Leyton.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6825609,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Small supermarket (< 1000m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Small_supermarket_1000m2.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Small supermarket (< 1000m2)",
      "question": "The company's establishments are of a \"proximity\" format (super small < 1000m2).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">El formato \"supermercado de proximidad\", tanto los supermercados medianos (menores de 2500m2), pero especialmente los pequeños supermercados (menores de 1000m), tienen un menor impacto ambiental debido a su capacidad para reducir las emisiones de gases a la atmósfera en todas las etapas de la alimentación. proceso de distribución: desde la recogida de los productos en su punto de origen y su recepción en la tienda hasta el acceso del cliente a la tienda y la entrega a domicilio. </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Estas tiendas suelen estar ubicadas en núcleos urbanos muy próximos a los hogares y lugares de trabajo de los consumidores, lo que significa que la gran mayoría de los clientes compra a pie (85% si también incluimos grandes supermercados entre 2501 y 5000m2). </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Relacionamos esta característica de los supermercados con sus emisiones de Alcance 3 ligadas al impacto de la movilidad de sus clientes.</span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "We value with a YES when the chain's store network (GROUP) corresponds to the super small format (  5000m2)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Small supermarket (< 1000m2)+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Small_supermarket_1000m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Small_supermarket_1000m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6825619,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Small or medium supermarket (< 2500m2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Small_or_medium_supermarket_2500m2.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Small or medium supermarket (< 2500m2)",
      "question": "The company's establishments are of a \"proximity\" format (super small or medium < 2500m2).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The \"proximity supermarket\" format, both medium-sized supers (under 2500m2), but especially small supermarkets (under 1000m), are shown to have the lowest environmental impact due to their ability to reduce atmospheric emissions at all stages of the food distribution process: from the collection of products at their point of origin and their reception in the shop to customer access to the shop and delivery to the customer's home.  <br>\nThese shops are often located in urban centres in close proximity to consumers' homes and workplaces, which means that the vast majority of customers shop on foot (85% if we also include large supermarkets between 2501 and 5000m2). <br>\nWe relate this characteristic of supermarkets to their Scope 3 emissions linked to the impact of their customers' travel and goods transport flows.<br>\n We value with a YES when the chain's (GROUP's) shop network corresponds to the super small format (< 1000m2) in most of its shops and does not include Hypermarkets (> 5000m2).",
      "methodology": "We value with a YES when the chain's network of stores corresponds to the super small format (<1000m2) or super medium format (<2500m2) mostly and does not include hypermarkets. Example Mercadona, which does not have hypermarkets and has mostly medium-sized stores, although it has quite a few large supermarkets (from 2501 to 4999m2)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Small or medium supermarket (< 2500m2)+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Small_or_medium_supermarket_2500m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Small_or_medium_supermarket_2500m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826152,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Carbon neutral or net zero emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Carbon_neutral_or_net_zero_emissions.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Carbon neutral or net zero emissions",
      "question": "The company certifies a net level of zero GHG emissions or carbon neutrality",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Carbon neutrality, or zero carbon footprint, refers to achieving net zero carbon dioxide emissions by balancing the amount of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere with an equivalent amount removed from the atmosphere or fixed by plants, or by purchasing sufficient carbon credits. <br>\nThe concept of carbon neutrality can be extended to include other greenhouse gases (GHGs) measured in terms of their equivalence to carbon dioxide (CO2e).<br>\nBest practice for organisations and individuals seeking to be carbon neutral involves first reducing or avoiding as many GHG emissions as possible, so that they then only need to offset unavoidable emissions. Neutrality is generally achieved in two ways:<br>\n<br>\nUsing only renewable energy, which does not produce carbon dioxide (this is also called a low-carbon economy, decarbonised economy or post-carbon economy).<br>\nCarbon offsets, by paying others to capture and store 100% of the carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere - for example by planting trees - or by financing carbon projects that should lead to preventing future emissions, or by buying carbon credits, which, in practice, are rights to emit GHGs, and there are a limited number of them on the carbon market.<br>\n<br>\nWhat are the main differences between carbon neutrality and net zero emissions?<br>\n<br>\nCarbon neutrality imposes a minimum requirement to cover scope 1 and 2 emissions, and recommends the inclusion of scope 3 emissions. Net zero emissions should cover emissions from all three scopes, 1, 2 and 3.<br>\n<br>\nTo achieve carbon neutrality, companies are not required to reduce their emissions along a given trajectory. To reach net zero emissions, organisations must reduce their emissions along a 1.5�C trajectory in Scopes 1, 2 and 3.<br>\n<br>\nCarbon neutrality certification is proof of an organisation's commitment to decarbonisation and neutralisation of the remaining impact by supporting environmental projects.  <br>\n<br>\nSome examples of certifications acquired by companies are :<br>\n<br>\n- PAS 2060 : is based on the PAS 2050 environmental standard. It sets out requirements for the quantification, reduction and offsetting of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from organisations, products and events. <br>\n<br>\n- GHG Protocol, ISO 14067",
      "methodology": "We will assign a\" \"YES\" \"if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares in some of its reports that it has reached a net zero GHG emissions level and details the type of certification achieved and the verification company<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company declares that it has achieved carbon neutrality and details the type of certification achieved and the verification company<br>\n<br>\nSome examples of certifications acquired by companies can be:<br>\n<br>\n- PAS 2060: it is based on the PAS 2050 environmental standard. It establishes the requirements for the quantification, reduction and compensation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from organizations, products and events.<br>\n<br>\n- ISO 14067<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-financial information statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Carbon neutral or net zero emissions+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Carbon_neutral_or_net_zero_emissions+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Carbon_neutral_or_net_zero_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826163,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Intensity of GHG emissions <150 kg of CO2-eq per m2",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Intensity_of_GHG_emissions_150_kg_of_CO2_eq_per_m2.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Intensity of GHG emissions <150 kg of CO2-eq per m2",
      "question": "The company's own GHG emissions (scope 1 and 2) are less than 150 kg of CO2-eq per m2 of commercial surface per year. .",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.4 GHG emissions intensity\"\"<br>\nGHG emissions intensity is a key indicator when monitoring the real relative impact of a company's carbon footprint. We therefore value companies including this indicator in their reporting, albeit with different denominators to the one we have chosen. <br>\nThe measure we have selected to assess the intensity of GHG emissions in the retail sector in a homogeneous way is TnCO2eq per m2.",
      "methodology": "This question is intended to reward the most efficient and least polluting companies in terms of emissions, taking into account the \"Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Intensity GRI 305-4\" indicator of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). This indicator, which measures the intensity ratio of scope 1 and 2 emissions, allows the degree of air pollution of an entity to be assessed and compared homogeneously in relation to a unit of activity, production, surface area or any other specific parameter, thus helping to contextualise the efficiency of the organisation, including in relation to other organisations. In our methodology for supermarkets we use as a specific parameter (denominator) the sales area in m2 as it is the most representative variable used in the sector.<br>\n <br>\nIn case the company does not directly publish its emissions intensity or does so using another parameter, the data will be collected from its absolute Scope 1 and 2 emissions and its total sales area in m2 :<br>\n<br>\n                Emission intensity = Total Scope 1 and 2 emissions in TnCo2 eq. / Sales area in m2<br>\n<br>\nThe sales area figure should be the same as the one used by the company for its emissions computation, so if the company does not publish it in its reports we will calculate it from another published ratio (electricity, waste or water per m2).<br>\nSo for example, if their total electricity consumption is 1000,000 kWh and they publish a consumption ratio of 100 kWh per m2, the company's surface area would be 1000,000 / 100 = 10,000 m2.<br>\n<br>\n In case the company does not publish any other ratio based on its commercial surface we will use the one published by reference sources such as Alimarket, InfoRetail, Statista, Nielsen, Kantar, IRI, etc. If this is the case, the source and the measurement method should be the same for the same company and years of evaluation.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"YES\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company's scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity is less than 150 kg CO2-eq per m2 of commercial floor area per year. <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-financial information statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Intensity of GHG emissions <150 kg of CO2-eq per m2+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Intensity_of_GHG_emissions_150_kg_of_CO2_eq_per_m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Intensity_of_GHG_emissions_150_kg_of_CO2_eq_per_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826174,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Intensity of GHG emissions <350 kg of CO2-eq per m2",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Intensity_of_GHG_emissions_350_kg_of_CO2_eq_per_m2.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Intensity of GHG emissions <350 kg of CO2-eq per m2",
      "question": "The company's own GHG emissions (scope 1 and 2) are less than 350 kg of CO2-eq per m2 of commercial area per year.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.4 GHG emissions intensity\"\"<br>\nGHG emissions intensity is a key indicator when monitoring the real relative impact of a company's carbon footprint. We therefore value companies including this indicator in their reporting, albeit with different denominators to the one we have chosen. <br>\nThe measure we have selected to assess the intensity of GHG emissions in the retail sector in a homogeneous way is TnCO2eq per m2.",
      "methodology": "This question is intended to reward the most efficient and least polluting companies in terms of emissions, taking into account the \"Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Intensity GRI 305-4\" indicator of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). This indicator, which measures the intensity ratio of scope 1 and 2 emissions, allows the degree of air pollution of an entity to be assessed and compared homogeneously in relation to a unit of activity, production, surface area or any other specific parameter, thus helping to contextualise the efficiency of the organisation, including in relation to other organisations. In our methodology for supermarkets we use as a specific parameter (denominator) the sales area in m2 as it is the most representative variable used in the sector.<br>\n <br>\nIn case the company does not directly publish its emissions intensity or does so using another parameter, the data will be collected from its absolute Scope 1 and 2 emissions and its total sales area in m2 :<br>\n<br>\n                Emission intensity = Total Scope 1 and 2 emissions in TnCo2 eq. / Sales area in m2<br>\n<br>\nThe sales area figure should be the same as the one used by the company for its emissions computation, so if the company does not publish it in its reports, we will calculate it from another published ratio (electricity, waste or water per m2).<br>\nSo for example, if their total electricity consumption is 1000,000 kWh and they publish a consumption ratio of 100 kWh per m2, the company's surface area would be 1000,000 / 100 = 10,000 m2.<br>\n<br>\n In case the company does not publish any other ratio based on its commercial surface we will use the one published by reference sources such as Alimarket, InfoRetail, Nielsen, Kantar, IRI, etc. If this is the case, the source and the measurement method should be the same for the same company and years of evaluation.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\"YES\"\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company's scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity is less than 350kg CO2-eq per m2 of commercial floor area per year.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-financial information statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Intensity of GHG emissions <350 kg of CO2-eq per m2+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Intensity_of_GHG_emissions_350_kg_of_CO2_eq_per_m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Intensity_of_GHG_emissions_350_kg_of_CO2_eq_per_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826185,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Intensity of GHG emissions <500 kg of CO2-eq per m2",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Intensity_of_GHG_emissions_500_kg_of_CO2_eq_per_m2.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Intensity of GHG emissions <500 kg of CO2-eq per m2",
      "question": "The company's own GHG emissions (scope 1 and 2) are less than 500kg of CO2-eq per m2 of commercial area per year.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.4 GHG emissions intensity\"\"<br>\nGHG emissions intensity is a key indicator when monitoring the real relative impact of a company's carbon footprint. We therefore value companies including this indicator in their reporting, albeit with different denominators to the one we have chosen. <br>\nThe measure we have selected to assess the intensity of GHG emissions in the retail sector in a homogeneous way is TnCO2eq per m2.",
      "methodology": "This question is intended to reward the most efficient and least polluting companies in terms of emissions, taking into account the \"Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Intensity GRI 305-4\" indicator of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). This indicator, which measures the intensity ratio of scope 1 and 2 emissions, allows the degree of air pollution of an entity to be assessed and compared homogeneously in relation to a unit of activity, production, surface area or any other specific parameter, thus helping to contextualise the efficiency of the organisation, including in relation to other organisations. In our methodology for supermarkets we use as a specific parameter (denominator) the sales area in m2 as it is the most representative variable used in the sector.<br>\n <br>\nIn case the company does not directly publish its emissions intensity or does so using another parameter, the data will be collected from its absolute Scope 1 and 2 emissions and its total sales area in m2 :<br>\n<br>\n                Emission intensity = Total Scope 1 and 2 emissions in TnCo2 eq. / Sales area in m2<br>\n<br>\nThe sales area figure should be the same as the one used by the company for its emissions computation, so if the company does not publish it in its reports, we will calculate it from another published ratio (electricity, waste or water per m2).<br>\nSo for example, if their total electricity consumption is 1000,000 kWh and they publish a consumption ratio of 100 kWh per m2, the company's surface area would be 1000,000 / 100 = 10,000 m2.<br>\n<br>\n In case the company does not publish any other ratio based on its commercial surface we will use the one published by reference sources such as Alimarket, InfoRetail, Nielsen, Kantar, IRI, etc. If this is the case, the source and the measurement method should be the same for the same company and years of evaluation.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\"YES\"\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company's scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity is less than 500kg CO2-eq per m2 of commercial floor area per year. <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-financial information statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Intensity of GHG emissions <500 kg of CO2-eq per m2+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Intensity_of_GHG_emissions_500_kg_of_CO2_eq_per_m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Intensity_of_GHG_emissions_500_kg_of_CO2_eq_per_m2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826196,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the intensity of GHG emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_intensity_of_GHG_emissions.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the intensity of GHG emissions",
      "question": "The company publishes the intensity of its emissions (per m2, sales, merchandise unit, etc.).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.4 GHG emissions intensity\"\"<br>\nGHG emissions intensity is a key indicator when monitoring the real relative impact of a company's carbon footprint. We therefore value companies including this indicator in their reporting, albeit with different denominators to the one we have chosen. <br>\nThe measure we have selected to assess the intensity of GHG emissions in the retail sector in a homogeneous way is TnCO2eq per m2.",
      "methodology": "The best way to establish a registration system that allows monitoring and improvement of the relative impact of GHGs emitted by a retail company with a large number of physical stores would be the registration in relation to the m2 of sales surface.<br>\nHowever, we will also answer with YES those data on the intensity of emissions with another type of denominator as established in the GRI 305-4 standard, Intensity of GHG emissions.<br>\nIn this sense, this denominator can be sales in � per year, m3 of merchandise, number of employees, etc ...<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-financial information statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the intensity of GHG emissions+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_intensity_of_GHG_emissions+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_intensity_of_GHG_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826207,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of the intensity of GHG emissions by 10%",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_the_intensity_of_GHG_emissions_by_10.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of the intensity of GHG emissions by 10%",
      "question": "The company has reduced the intensity of its own emissions (scope 1 & 2)  vs  previous year or base year by at least 10%.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.4 GHG emissions intensity\"\"<br>\nGHG emissions intensity is a key indicator when monitoring the real relative impact of a company's carbon footprint. We therefore value companies including this indicator in their reporting, albeit with different denominators to the one we have chosen. <br>\nThe measure we have selected to assess the intensity of GHG emissions in the retail sector in a homogeneous way is TnCO2eq per m2.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a\" \"YES\" \"if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it has reduced the intensity of its own emissions 1 + 2 with respect to the previous year or base year by at least 10%. The base year must be specified by the company in its report<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company does not make a statement in this regard, but it is possible to calculate said reduction based on the previous year. In this case, we must have the emissions ratio for the current year and the previous year, or have the surface data and total emissions for both years <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-financial information statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of the intensity of GHG emissions by 10%+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_the_intensity_of_GHG_emissions_by_10+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_the_intensity_of_GHG_emissions_by_10+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826218,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of GHG emissions by 60%",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_60.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of GHG emissions by 60%",
      "question": "The company has reduced or offset more than 60% of its Scope 1 and 2 emissions in the last 5 years or in relation to its base year",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.5 Reduction of GHG emissions \"\"<br>\n With this metric, based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) \"Content 305-5 GHG Emissions Reduction\", we aim to assess the performance of companies in reducing their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to have reduced its own emissions by 60% (scope 1 and 2) in the last 5 years or vs. base year.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company does not claim to have reduced its own emissions by 60% (scope 1 and 2) in the last 5 years or vs. base year, but it is possible to calculate said reduction from its current and historical data. The data of the oldest year published in the same report will be used as a reference for the calculation.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not claim to have reduced its own emissions by 60% (scope 1 and 2) and it is not possible to compare its current emissions with those of the previous year. The company does not publish emissions data from previous years in the same report<br>\nOr:<br>\n- After calculating the total emissions of the company compared to the previous year, there has not been a reduction of at least 60%<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of GHG emissions by 60%+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_60+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_60+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826229,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of GHG emissions by 30%",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_30.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of GHG emissions by 30%",
      "question": "The company has reduced or offset more than 30% of its Scope 1 and 2 emissions in the last 5 years or in relation to its base year",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.5 Reduction of GHG emissions \"\"<br>\n With this metric, based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) \"Content 305-5 GHG Emissions Reduction\", we aim to assess the performance of companies in reducing their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to have reduced its own emissions by 30% (scope 1 and 2) in the last 5 years or vs. base year.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company does not declare that it has reduced its own emissions by 30% (scope 1 and 2) in the last 5 years or vs. base year, but it is possible to calculate said reduction from its current and historical data. The data of the oldest year published in the same report will be used as a reference for the calculation.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not claim to have reduced its own emissions by 30% (scope 1 and 2) and it is not possible to compare its current emissions with those of the previous year. The company does not publish emissions data from previous years in the same report<br>\nOr:<br>\n- After calculating the company's total emissions with respect to the previous year, there has not been a reduction of at least 30%<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of GHG emissions by 30%+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_30+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_30+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826240,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of GHG emissions by 10%",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_10.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of GHG emissions by 10%",
      "question": "The company has reduced or offset more than 10% of its Scope 1 and 2 emissions in the last 5 years or in relation to its base year",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.5 Reduction of GHG emissions \"\"<br>\n With this metric, based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) \"Content 305-5 GHG Emissions Reduction\", we aim to assess the performance of companies in reducing their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it has reduced its own emissions by 10% (scope 1 and 2) in the last 5 years or vs. base year.<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not declare that it has reduced its own emissions by 10% (scope 1 and 2) in the last 5 years or vs. base year, but it is possible to calculate such reduction from its current and historical data. The data of the oldest year published in the same report will be used as a reference for the calculation.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not declare having reduced its own emissions by 10% (scope 1 and 2) and it is not possible to compare its current emissions with those of the previous year. The company does not publish emissions data from previous years in the same report<br>\nOr:<br>\n- After calculating the total emissions of the company with respect to those of the previous year, there has not been a reduction of at least 10%<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of GHG emissions by 10%+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_10+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_10+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826251,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of historical data on GHG emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_historical_data_on_GHG_emissions.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of historical data on GHG emissions",
      "question": "The company publishes the historical data of its emissions in the same report (at least those of the previous year).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.5 Reduction of GHG emissions \"\"<br>\n With this metric, based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) \"Content 305-5 GHG Emissions Reduction\", we aim to assess the performance of companies in reducing their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.",
      "methodology": "With this question we want to reward the transparency and willingness of the company to give more visibility of its data and the possibility of checking and seeing the evolution of its performance.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the year of its report and for at least the previous year<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company only publishes the emissions data for the year of its report<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of historical data on GHG emissions+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_historical_data_on_GHG_emissions+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_historical_data_on_GHG_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826262,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of GHG emissions by 5%",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_5.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of GHG emissions by 5%",
      "question": "The company has reduced or offset more than 5% of its Scope 1 and 2 emissions in the last 5 years or in relation to its base year",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.5 Reduction of GHG emissions \"\"<br>\n With this metric, based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) \"Content 305-5 GHG Emissions Reduction\", we aim to assess the performance of companies in reducing their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to have reduced its own emissions by 5% (scope 1 and 2) in the last 5 years or vs. base year.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company does not declare that it has reduced its own emissions by 5% (scope 1 and 2) in the last 5 years or vs. base year, but it is possible to calculate said reduction from its current and historical data. The data of the oldest year published in the same report will be used as a reference for the calculation.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not declare that it has reduced its own emissions by 5% (scope 1 and 2) and it is not possible to compare its current emissions with those of the previous year. The company does not publish emissions data from previous years in the same report<br>\nOr:<br>\n- After calculating the total emissions of the company with respect to those of the previous year, there has not been a reduction of at least 5%<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of GHG emissions by 5%+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_5+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_5+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826273,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions reduction or compensation vs. last year",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_reduction_or_compensation_vs_last_year.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Scope 3 emissions reduction or compensation vs. last year",
      "question": "The company has offset or reduced scope 3 emissions from the previous year.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.5 Reduction of GHG emissions \"\"<br>\n With this metric, based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) \"Content 305-5 GHG Emissions Reduction\", we aim to assess the performance of companies in reducing their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- Scope 1 and 2 emissions are clearly published separately by adding the breakdown of the sources of the emissions included in each type<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- Relevant sources are omitted within each type of emissions, such as<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF) \"",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Use of Carbon Offsets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions reduction or compensation vs. last year+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_reduction_or_compensation_vs_last_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_reduction_or_compensation_vs_last_year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826284,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+More than 90% of suppliers are from Spain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_90_of_suppliers_are_from_Spain.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "More than 90% of suppliers are from Spain",
      "question": "More than 90% of the company's suppliers are Spanish.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The regionalisation of suppliers ensures the marketing of fresh and local products. In addition, it allows products that are specific to a given locality to be made known to the rest of the country, thus adapting to the demands of different customers. It also reduces emissions by shortening transport distances and promotes the local economy.                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Here we address the proportion of the company's purchasing of local or regional products either in terms of the number of local suppliers or the amount in � of the purchase based on the GRI 204-1 standard Proportion of spending on local suppliers.  <br>\n<br>\nCompanies often publish data on the ratio of their local or national suppliers to their total suppliers. In the case of supermarkets, depending on the activities and services offered by the company at group level, in addition to food, drugstore and perfumery products, their suppliers may include textiles, hardware, electronics, etc.",
      "methodology": "The% can be on the number of total suppliers, the assortment of references / products or on the total purchase expense, leaving us with the highest figure in case the company publishes a% in relation to more than one variable.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a YES if the company publishes any data on the proportion of products of national origin (number of national suppliers, purchases from national suppliers or assortment of national origin over the total and this is greater than 90%. In case of publishing more than one, we will keep the highest<br>\n<br>\nIf the company does not publish this data directly, we assess with a YES if we can at least calculate the ratio and it is higher than 90%. In this case we should see published the total number of suppliers, purchases in � or products purchased and the number of national suppliers (purchases in �, products, ...).<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a NO if the company does not publish any data in this regard, or it does publish it or it is possible to calculate it, but this is less than 90% or else.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+More than 90% of suppliers are from Spain+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_90_of_suppliers_are_from_Spain+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_90_of_suppliers_are_from_Spain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826295,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+More than 80% of suppliers are from Spain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_80_of_suppliers_are_from_Spain.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "More than 80% of suppliers are from Spain",
      "question": "More than 80% of the company's suppliers are Spanish.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The regionalisation of suppliers ensures the marketing of fresh and local products. In addition, it allows products that are specific to a given locality to be made known to the rest of the country, thus adapting to the demands of different customers. It also reduces emissions by shortening transport distances and promotes the local economy.                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Here we address the proportion of the company's purchasing of local or regional products either in terms of the number of local suppliers or the amount in � of the purchase based on the GRI 204-1 standard Proportion of spending on local suppliers.  <br>\n<br>\nCompanies often publish data on the ratio of their local or national suppliers to their total suppliers. In the case of supermarkets, depending on the activities and services offered by the company at group level, in addition to food, drugstore and perfumery products, their suppliers may include textiles, hardware, electronics, etc.",
      "methodology": "The% can be on the number of total suppliers, the assortment of references / products or on the total purchase expense, leaving us with the highest figure in case the company publishes a% in relation to more than one variable.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a YES if the company publishes any data on the proportion of products of national origin (number of national suppliers, purchases from national suppliers or assortment of national origin over the total and this is greater than 80%. In case of publishing more than one, we will keep the highest<br>\n<br>\nIf the company does not publish this data directly, we assess with a YES if we can at least calculate the ratio and this is higher than 80%. In this case we should see published the total number of suppliers, purchases in � or products purchased and the number of national suppliers (purchases in �, products, ...).<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a NO if the company does not publish any data in this regard, or it does publish it or it is possible to calculate it, but this is less than 80% or else.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+More than 80% of suppliers are from Spain+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_80_of_suppliers_are_from_Spain+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_80_of_suppliers_are_from_Spain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826306,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+More than 70% of suppliers are from Spain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_70_of_suppliers_are_from_Spain.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "More than 70% of suppliers are from Spain",
      "question": "More than 70% of the company's suppliers are Spanish.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The regionalisation of suppliers ensures the marketing of fresh and local products. In addition, it allows products that are specific to a given locality to be made known to the rest of the country, thus adapting to the demands of different customers. It also reduces emissions by shortening transport distances and promotes the local economy.                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Here we address the proportion of the company's purchasing of local or regional products either in terms of the number of local suppliers or the amount in � of the purchase based on the GRI 204-1 standard Proportion of spending on local suppliers.  <br>\n<br>\nCompanies often publish data on the ratio of their local or national suppliers to their total suppliers. In the case of supermarkets, depending on the activities and services offered by the company at group level, in addition to food, drugstore and perfumery products, their suppliers may include textiles, hardware, electronics, etc.",
      "methodology": "The% can be on the number of total suppliers, the assortment of references / products or on the total purchase expense, leaving us with the highest figure in case the company publishes a% in relation to more than one variable.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a YES if the company publishes any data on the proportion of products of national origin (number of national suppliers, purchases from national suppliers or assortment of national origin over the total and this is greater than 70%. In case of publishing more than one, we will keep the highest<br>\n<br>\nIf the company does not publish this data directly, we assess with a YES if we can at least calculate the ratio and it is higher than 70%. In this case we should see published the total number of suppliers, purchases in � or products purchased and the number of national suppliers (purchases in �, products, ...).<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a NO if the company does not publish any data in this regard, or it does publish it or it is possible to calculate it, but this is less than 70% or else.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+More than 70% of suppliers are from Spain+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_70_of_suppliers_are_from_Spain+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_70_of_suppliers_are_from_Spain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826317,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Visibility of the national/local product in physical and online store",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Visibility_of_the_national_local_product_in_physical_and_online_store.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Visibility of the national/local product in physical and online store",
      "question": "The company makes the national / regional product visible both on its shelves and in its online store above the rest.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This question evaluates how the company promotes the choice of Spanish and regional products at the point of sale. <br>\n<br>\nAlthough here we include this question within the environmental dimension and in particular linked to the carbon footprint, the prevalence of Spanish products also encompasses other social aspects such as the promotion of local economy and development, so this metric is also included in our evaluation related to the social impact of companies. <br>\nIn the case of the online shop, there should be a section that highlights and differentiates national, local and/or regional products from the rest. <br>\n<br>\nAs an example of good practice we highlight Eroski, which identifies 20,000 products with the drawing of the flag of each community",
      "methodology": "We assess with a YES any merchandising or shopper experience strategy to facilitate the visibility of the national and / or local product both in physical stores and in the online store, for example:<br>\n<br>\n- Distinctive in the labeling of own brand products (regional or national flag)<br>\n<br>\n- Location of the products at an average height of the line (more within reach of the buyer)<br>\n<br>\n- Any indicative such as visible signage, \"\" displays \"\", gondola header, etc ..<br>\n<br>\n- In the case of the online store, there must be a section that highlights and differentiates national, local and / or regional products from the rest.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found by visiting the supermarket stores or in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)<br>\n- The company's online store",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Visibility of the national/local product in physical and online store+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Visibility_of_the_national_local_product_in_physical_and_online_store+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Visibility_of_the_national_local_product_in_physical_and_online_store+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826328,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Distinction of the national product in the labeling",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Distinction_of_the_national_product_in_the_labeling.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Distinction of the national product in the labeling",
      "question": "The company distinguishes the national or regional origin in the labeling of its own brand products or establishes it as a goal before 2022.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The entry into force of Regulation (EU) 2018/775, which regulates information on the origin of foodstuffs in the European Union, makes it possible to know in greater detail the origin of the products we find on the market. Consumers will be able to know more easily the origin of the food they buy on the market. <br>\nOne of the requirements consists of detailing the country of origin. As already advanced in Regulation 1169/2011, the country of origin must be indicated when omitting it could mislead the consumer about the real origin of the product (for example, when the place of origin of the product is not the same as that of its primary ingredient). <br>\n<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess that companies go a step further and make it easier for consumers through labelling to better visually distinguish the origin of their own-brand products.",
      "methodology": "We assess with a YES if the company's own brand products, especially fescos (fruit and vegetables, dairy products, meat and fish) carry a distinctive on their labeling to facilitate the visibility of their national and / or local origin, for example :<br>\n<br>\n- Regional or national icon or flag<br>\n<br>\n- Distinction \"\" origin Spain, Galicia, Andalusia, .... \"\" made in Spain \"\", etc ..<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found by visiting the supermarket stores, visiting the website https://es.openfoodfacts.org/ or in any of the following reports published on the companies website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)<br>\n- Online store of the company",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Distinction of the national product in the labeling+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Distinction_of_the_national_product_in_the_labeling+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Distinction_of_the_national_product_in_the_labeling+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826339,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Campaigns to promote local products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Campaigns_to_promote_local_products.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Campaigns to promote local products",
      "question": "The company has developed or will develop relevant campaigns in order to promote local products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.6 Local suppliers\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, based on GRI 204-1 Proportion of expenditure on local suppliers, we assess the local sourcing of products offered by retailers, especially fresh produce. <br>\nThese products are likely to have the greatest environmental impact due to delocalisation because of their sales volume: in 2016, according to Femex data, in Spain we imported 1.6 million tonnes of fruit and 1.2 million tonnes of vegetables. Organisations such as Greenpeace warn of the CO2 emissions involved in this process (transport, cold storage...). Specifically, a review of studies carried out by Engineering Without Borders attributed between 15% and 20% of the greenhouse gas emissions produced by the agricultural industry to processing, packaging and transport.",
      "methodology": "We assess with a YES if the company carries out any initiative to promote regional products and thus bring the production of small producers closer to its customers, for example:<br>\n<br>\n- Organization or participation in regional fairs<br>\n- Promotion campaigns in physical stores<br>\n- Marketing campaigns (online or offline)<br>\n- Training programs, awareness<br>\n- Awards ceremony for regional producers<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)<br>\n- Online store of the company",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Campaigns to promote local products+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Campaigns_to_promote_local_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Campaigns_to_promote_local_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826350,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+More than 80% of fruit & vegetables of national origin",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_80_of_fruit_vegetables_of_national_origin.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "More than 80% of fruit & vegetables of national origin",
      "question": "More than 80% of the fruit and vegetables are of national origin.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "With this metric we aim to assess the national provenance of fruit and vegetables offered by supermarkets.",
      "methodology": "We will see if the data is published directly by the chain in its reports, or if not, we will use the latest report published by Afrucat.<br>\n<br>\n This is a study prepared by the Infolineal cabinet for the Associaci� Empresarial de Fruita de Catalunya (Afrucat) in which the origins of apples and pears are audited on the sales lines of the main Spanish supermarkets in the cities of Barcelona , Madrid, Zaragoza, Lleida.<br>\n<br>\nFor our last evaluation of 2019, we have taken the latest reports of this ranking (April and September 2019) and we have assigned a YES to supermarkets that exceed 80% of apples and pears of origin Spain on average in the last 2 audited periods.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- According to the Afrucat \"\" Infolineal \"\" report, the supermarket exceeds 50% of apples and pears from Spain on average in the last 2 audited periods<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company publishes the ratio of its fruit and vegetables of Spain origin over the total and this is higher than 50%<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish any information on its proportion of fruit and vegetables of national origin<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company publishes its proportion of fruit and vegetables of national origin and this is less than 80%<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company does not publish data, but according to Afrucat's \"\" Infolineal \"\" report, the supermarket does not exceed 80% of apples and pears from Spain on average in the last 2 audited periods<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)<br>\n<br>\nIf the company does not publish this information, we will consult the latest \"\" Infolineal \"\" report from Afrucat on the origin of apples and pears in Spanish supermarkets.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+More than 80% of fruit & vegetables of national origin+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_80_of_fruit_vegetables_of_national_origin+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_80_of_fruit_vegetables_of_national_origin+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826361,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+More than 50% of food of regional origin",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_50_of_food_of_regional_origin.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "More than 50% of food of regional origin",
      "question": "More than 50% of the own food brand are purchased from local or regional suppliers (at least within the same autonomous community).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "With this metric, based on the GRI 204-1 Proportion of expenditure on local suppliers standard, we aim to assess the national origin of own-brand products offered by supermarkets. <br>\n<br>\nThe regionalisation of suppliers ensures the marketing of fresh and local products. In addition, it allows products that are specific to a locality to be made known to the rest of the country, thus adapting to the demands of different customers. It also reduces emissions by shortening transport journeys and promotes the local economy",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes some data on commercial suppliers and local producers by autonomous community (or other territorial unit) and we can verify that the proportion of local suppliers (in number, total purchases in �, number of references, etc ...) is higher 50%<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company declares in some of its reports that the proportion of its regional suppliers is greater than 50% with respect to the total number of commercial suppliers (in total number of suppliers, total purchases in �, number of references, etc ...).<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish any information that quantifies its regional suppliers with respect to the total total suppliers<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company publishes its proportion of regional suppliers and this is less than 50%.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Report on Suppliers<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+More than 50% of food of regional origin+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_50_of_food_of_regional_origin+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_50_of_food_of_regional_origin+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826372,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+More than 30% of food of regional origin",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_30_of_food_of_regional_origin.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "More than 30% of food of regional origin",
      "question": "More than 30% of the own brand of food are bought from local or regional suppliers (at least within the same autonomous community).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "With this metric, based on the GRI 204-1 Proportion of expenditure on local suppliers standard, we aim to assess the national origin of own-brand products offered by supermarkets. <br>\n<br>\nThe regionalisation of suppliers ensures the marketing of fresh and local products. In addition, it allows products that are specific to a locality to be made known to the rest of the country, thus adapting to the demands of different customers. It also reduces emissions by shortening transport journeys and promotes the local economy",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes the total number of commercial suppliers and local producers by autonomous community (or other territorial unit) and we can verify that the proportion of local suppliers is higher than 30%<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company declares in some of its reports that the proportion of its regional suppliers is higher than 30% with respect to the total number of commercial suppliers.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish any information that quantifies its regional suppliers with respect to the total total suppliers<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company publishes its proportion of regional suppliers and this is less than 30%.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Report on Suppliers<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+More than 30% of food of regional origin+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_30_of_food_of_regional_origin+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_30_of_food_of_regional_origin+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826383,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+50% of light transport covered with zero emission vehicles.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_of_light_transport_covered_with_zero_emission_vehicles.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "50% of light transport covered with zero emission vehicles.",
      "question": "More than 50% of the company's light transport is carried out with zero-emission vehicles.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "A light transport vehicle or delivery vehicle is a cargo vehicle used to deliver goods of small volume and weight over short distances, as opposed to a trailer or freight train, for example. We refer mainly to the transport, both own or subcontracted, used by supermarkets for home delivery, online orders, last mile, short transfers in general.<br>\n<br>\nBy \"zero emission\" transport we mean electric vehicles according to the classification of vehicles derived from the National Plan for Air Quality and Atmospheric Protection 2013-2016 (Air Plan) and mechanical traction vehicles such as bicycles:<br>\n<br>\nBattery Electric Vehicles (BEV), Range Extended Electric Vehicle (REEV), Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) with a minimum range of 40 kilometres or fuel cell vehicles.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares in some of its reports that at least 50% of its light transport is classified as \"\" zero emissions \"\"<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish any information regarding the proportion of its zero emission light transport means with respect to the total or this is less than 50%.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+50% of light transport covered with zero emission vehicles.+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_of_light_transport_covered_with_zero_emission_vehicles+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_of_light_transport_covered_with_zero_emission_vehicles+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826394,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Introduction of zero emission vehicles in light transport.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Introduction_of_zero_emission_vehicles_in_light_transport.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Introduction of zero emission vehicles in light transport.",
      "question": "The company introduces zero-emission vehicles in its light and last-mile logistics processes or sets concrete goals to do so.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "A light transport vehicle or delivery vehicle is a cargo vehicle used to deliver goods of small volume and weight over short distances, as opposed to a trailer or freight train, for example. We refer mainly to the transport, both own or subcontracted, used by supermarkets for home delivery, online orders, last mile, short transfers in general.<br>\n<br>\nBy \"zero emission\" transport we mean electric vehicles according to the classification of vehicles derived from the National Plan for Air Quality and Atmospheric Protection 2013-2016 (Air Plan) and mechanical traction vehicles such as bicycles:<br>\n<br>\nBattery Electric Vehicles (BEV), Range Extended Electric Vehicle (REEV), Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) with a minimum range of 40 kilometres or fuel cell vehicles.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares in some of its reports that it includes \"\" zero emissions \"\" means of transport in its light transport, although it does not specify in what proportion<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company declares in some of its reports that it has specific objectives of including \"\" zero emissions \"\" means of transport in its light transport with an established deadline<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish any information in this regard.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Introduction of zero emission vehicles in light transport.+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Introduction_of_zero_emission_vehicles_in_light_transport+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Introduction_of_zero_emission_vehicles_in_light_transport+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826405,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+80% of the transport covered under the EURO 5 standard.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_the_transport_covered_under_the_EURO_5_standard.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "80% of the transport covered under the EURO 5 standard.",
      "question": "More than 80% of the company's ground transportation is carried out with vehicles at least under the EURO 5 and EURO V standards.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Here we refer to heavier transport for large volumes of goods between purchasing centres and sales outlets for example. <br>\nEuropean pollutant emission standards can be defined as the set of requirements that regulate the acceptable limits for internal combustion gas emissions from new vehicles sold in the EU Member States.<br>\n<br>\nThey are defined in a series of progressively implemented directives that are becoming increasingly restrictive, hence the increasing number of different standards (Euro 4, Euro 5, Euro 6...).<br>\nAt present, EURO VI applies to heavy-duty vehicles and EURO 6 to passenger cars, with different emission limits for petrol and diesel vehicles. <br>\n<br>\nWe require in this metric that 80% of the company's transport is at least EURO 5, although the most current version is EURO 6, which in turn has evolved with various temporary regulations (Euro 6c, Euro 6d, Euro 6d-TEMP EVAP-ISC...)",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that 80% of its heavy transport is at least under the EURO V standard or it is possible to calculate this ratio from the data published on its vehicles.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish data on the standards of its transport vehicles. Or:<br>\n- Less than 80% of its heavy transport is at least under the EURO V standard. This data is declared in a report or it is possible to calculate it.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+80% of the transport covered under the EURO 5 standard.+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_the_transport_covered_under_the_EURO_5_standard+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_the_transport_covered_under_the_EURO_5_standard+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826416,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+80% of the transport covered under the EURO 6 standard.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_the_transport_covered_under_the_EURO_6_standard.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "80% of the transport covered under the EURO 6 standard.",
      "question": "More than 80% of the company's land transport is carried out with vehicles at least under the EURO 6 and EURO VI standard.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Here we refer to heavier transport for large volumes of goods between purchasing centres and sales outlets for example. <br>\nEuropean pollutant emission standards can be defined as the set of requirements that regulate the acceptable limits for internal combustion gas emissions from new vehicles sold in the EU Member States.<br>\n<br>\nThey are defined in a series of progressively implemented directives that are becoming increasingly restrictive, hence the increasing number of different standards (Euro 4, Euro 5, Euro 6...).<br>\nAt present, EURO VI applies to heavy-duty vehicles and EURO 6 to passenger cars, with different emission limits for petrol and diesel vehicles. <br>\n<br>\nWe require in this metric that 80% of the company's transport is at least EURO 5, although the most current version is EURO 6, which in turn has evolved with various temporary regulations (Euro 6c, Euro 6d, Euro 6d-TEMP EVAP-ISC...)",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that 80% of its heavy transport is at least under the EURO VI standard or it is possible to calculate this ratio from the data published on its vehicles.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish data on the standards of its transport vehicles. Or:<br>\n- Less than 80% of its heavy transport is at least under the EURO VI standard. This data is declared in a report or it is possible to calculate it<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+80% of the transport covered under the EURO 6 standard.+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_the_transport_covered_under_the_EURO_6_standard+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_the_transport_covered_under_the_EURO_6_standard+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826427,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Introduction of vehicles under the EURO 6 standard.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Introduction_of_vehicles_under_the_EURO_6_standard.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Introduction of vehicles under the EURO 6 standard.",
      "question": "The company has started to introduce vehicles at least under the EURO 6 / VI standard or establishes concrete objectives to do so.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Here we refer to heavier transport for large volumes of goods between purchasing centres and sales outlets for example. <br>\nEuropean pollutant emission standards can be defined as the set of requirements that regulate the acceptable limits for internal combustion gas emissions from new vehicles sold in the EU Member States.<br>\n<br>\nThey are defined in a series of progressively implemented directives that are becoming increasingly restrictive, hence the increasing number of different standards (Euro 4, Euro 5, Euro 6...).<br>\nAt present, EURO VI applies to heavy-duty vehicles and EURO 6 to passenger cars, with different emission limits for petrol and diesel vehicles. <br>\n<br>\nWe require in this metric that 80% of the company's transport is at least EURO 5, although the most current version is EURO 6, which in turn has evolved with various temporary regulations (Euro 6c, Euro 6d, Euro 6d-TEMP EVAP-ISC...)",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares in some of its reports that it includes vehicles under the Euro VI standard although it does not specify in what proportion.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company declares in some of its reports that it has specific objectives of including vehicles under the Euro VI standard with an established deadline.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish any statement in this regard.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Introduction of vehicles under the EURO 6 standard.+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Introduction_of_vehicles_under_the_EURO_6_standard+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Introduction_of_vehicles_under_the_EURO_6_standard+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826438,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Heavy vehicle fill rate over 80%.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Heavy_vehicle_fill_rate_over_80.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Heavy vehicle fill rate over 80%.",
      "question": "The fill index of its heavy vehicles is over 80%.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "With this metric we aim to assess the efficiency of the companies' transport. The enormous load of goods that a supermarket carries makes it essential to optimise routes and consolidate container loads in order to increase their capacity and thus reduce their carbon footprint.<br>\nWe have considered the average occupancy rate of its heavy goods vehicles or \"fill rate\" as an indicator.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares in some a filling index of its transport trucks higher than 80%. Both in own or outsourced fleet<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company reports that the filling rate of its transport trucks is less than 80% or we do not find statements about it in its reports.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Heavy vehicle fill rate over 80%.+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Heavy_vehicle_fill_rate_over_80+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Heavy_vehicle_fill_rate_over_80+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826449,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Training on ecological driving for carriers.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Training_on_ecological_driving_for_carriers.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Training on ecological driving for carriers.",
      "question": "The company provides training in eco-driving techniques to its drivers.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "With this metric we evaluate the companies' efforts to raise awareness and train their own and subcontracted fleet drivers in Green Driving to improve freight transport efficiency and thus reduce fuel consumption.<br>\n<br>\nSome best practices collected in the sector are :<br>\n<br>\n- Information on the use of natural gas in both maritime and land transport.<br>\n- Information on the location of compressed natural gas refuelling stations.<br>\n- Communication of legislative developments.<br>\n- Information on the existing supply of alternative energy vehicles.<br>\n- How to drive more fuel-efficiently<br>\n- Training in eco-driving techniques",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it prescribes or provides training in ecological driving to drivers of both its own or subcontracted fleet<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Training on ecological driving for carriers.+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Training_on_ecological_driving_for_carriers+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Training_on_ecological_driving_for_carriers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826460,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Actions to improve logistics efficiency.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Actions_to_improve_logistics_efficiency.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Actions to improve logistics efficiency.",
      "question": "The company develops other concrete actions to improve its logistics efficiency.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "We use this metric to assess all the actions implemented by the company to improve the efficiency of its transport.<br>\nThe following is a summary of the best practices in the sector in terms of logistics efficiency:<br>\n<br>\n- Biofuels <br>\n- Transport by rail instead of road whenever possible.<br>\n- Adherence to the Lean & Green programme which recognises the quantifiable reduction of carbon emissions.<br>\n- Reverse logistics. Planning of journeys, both outbound and return, avoids unnecessary journeys. <br>\n- Targets to reduce the number of kilometres travelled per year.<br>\n- Measurement of CO2 emissions generated by the transport of goods from your establishments.<br>\n- Use of mixed bitemperature lorries that can accommodate both dry and refrigerated food products in the same lorry.<br>\n- Low rolling resistance and roof spoilers on trucks to reduce fuel consumption.<br>\n- Natural gas vehicles<br>\n- Improved demand planning. <br>\n- Continuous optimisation of the source purchase transport model. <br>\n- Concentration and simplification of the platform map.<br>\n - Implementation of a Transport Manager System, which optimises the planning and monitoring of routes and the filling of goods.<br>\n - Collaboration with suppliers to optimise the use of vehicles.<br>\n- Renewal of the fleet with the incorporation of vehicles adapted to the new European Union Euro 6 anti-pollution regulations. <br>\n- Use of fuel additives that can reduce greenhouse gases.<br>\n - Promotion of the use of electric vehicles. <br>\n- Use of vehicles that allow for more optimal filling, such as city trailers. <br>\n- Use of vehicles that use liquefied petroleum gas as fuel.<br>\n- Megatrailers or Megatrucks of high capacity (at least 100m�).<br>\n- Slow Steaming, (speed in maritime transport significantly lower than its maximum speed). in order to reduce fuel costs: With this practice it is possible to reduce it by 59%.<br>\n- Consolidation at origin. This allows national transport to be reduced to a minimum, as it is sent directly from the ports of arrival to the nearest destination warehouse, thus minimising road transport.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it has implemented at least 2 measures to improve logistics efficiency (see previous list of best practices as an example)<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company communicates declarations without specifying concrete actions such as \"\" we will improve our logistics efficiency \"\"; \"\" we have sustainable, responsible, ecological transport, etc ... \"\"; \"\" we work to reduce the emissions associated with logistics transport \"\", etc ...<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF) \"",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Actions to improve logistics efficiency.+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Actions_to_improve_logistics_efficiency+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Actions_to_improve_logistics_efficiency+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826471,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of logistics emissions by 15%.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_logistics_emissions_by_15.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of logistics emissions by 15%.",
      "question": "The company has managed to reduce its logistics carbon footprint by at least 15% in the last 5 years.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.7 Sustainable logistics\"\"<br>\nThe responsibility of shopping centres and in particular supermarkets for pollutant emissions lies mainly in their large logistical activity.<br>\n In Europe, lorries account for 22% of road transport emissions, although they account for only 2% of the vehicles on the roads. The EU recently set a 30% reduction target for pollutant emissions from new trucks from 2030, with an average target of 15% in 2025 compared to the levels recorded in 2019.<br>\n<br>\nIn this section, we value agile and responsible logistics, capable of adapting to changes and incorporating environmental aspects in its strategy.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it has reduced CO2 emissions from its logistics transport by at least 15% in the last 5 years.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company does not make any declarations in this regard, but it is possible to verify a reduction of 15% by comparing its logistics emissions for the last 2 years in its report.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company participates in the Lean & Green program and has achieved its first star, for which it is recognized for having reduced its logistics emissions by 20% in the last 5 years.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- Relevant sources are omitted within each type of emissions, such as<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of logistics emissions by 15%.+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_logistics_emissions_by_15+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_logistics_emissions_by_15+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826482,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Objective to reduce logistics emissions by 20%.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Objective_to_reduce_logistics_emissions_by_20.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Objective to reduce logistics emissions by 20%.",
      "question": "The company sets concrete targets to reduce its logistics carbon footprint by at least 20% in the next 5 years.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.7 Sustainable logistics\"\"<br>\nThe responsibility of shopping centres and in particular supermarkets for pollutant emissions lies mainly in their large logistical activity.<br>\n In Europe, lorries account for 22% of road transport emissions, although they account for only 2% of the vehicles on the roads. The EU recently set a 30% reduction target for pollutant emissions from new trucks from 2030, with an average target of 15% in 2025 compared to the levels recorded in 2019.<br>\n<br>\nIn this section, we value agile and responsible logistics, capable of adapting to changes and incorporating environmental aspects in its strategy.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares a specific objective of reducing CO2 emissions from its logistics transport by at least 20% in the next 5 years.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company participates in the Lean & Green program, by which it undertakes to reduce its logistics emissions by 20% in the next 5 years<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- There are no statements in this regard in any of the reports.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Objective to reduce logistics emissions by 20%.+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Objective_to_reduce_logistics_emissions_by_20+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Objective_to_reduce_logistics_emissions_by_20+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826493,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+10% reduction in waste generated vs. last year",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+10_reduction_in_waste_generated_vs_last_year.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "10% reduction in waste generated vs. last year",
      "question": "The company has reduced the net waste generated by more than 10% compared to the previous year.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.1 Waste reduction and prevention\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts in waste reduction and waste prevention",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company publicly declares in one of its reports that it has reduced the weight of its waste by at least 10% compared to the previous year, or it publishes its waste data from the previous year in order to calculate and verify said reduction<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish its total waste and does not mention any reduction in its report in this regard<br>\n- The company publishes its waste generated in the last 2 years and this has not been reduced by at least 10%<br>\n- The company declares that it has reduced its waste by less than 10% or increased it.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+10% reduction in waste generated vs. last year+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+10_reduction_in_waste_generated_vs_last_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+10_reduction_in_waste_generated_vs_last_year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826504,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+5% reduction in waste generated vs. last year",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_reduction_in_waste_generated_vs_last_year.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "5% reduction in waste generated vs. last year",
      "question": "The company has reduced the net waste generated by at least 5% compared to the previous year.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.1 Waste reduction and prevention\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts in waste reduction and waste prevention",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company publicly declares in some of its reports that it has reduced the weight of its waste by at least 5% compared to the previous year, or it publishes its waste data from the previous year in order to calculate and verify said reduction<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish its total waste and does not mention any reduction in its report in this regard<br>\n- The company publishes its waste generated in the last 2 years and this has not been reduced by at least 5%<br>\n- The company declares that it has reduced its waste by less than 5% or increased it.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+5% reduction in waste generated vs. last year+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_reduction_in_waste_generated_vs_last_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_reduction_in_waste_generated_vs_last_year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826515,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Zero waste in all establishments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_waste_in_all_establishments.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Zero waste in all establishments",
      "question": "The company is declared and / or certified as \"zero waste\" in all its facilities.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "AENOR is currently the entity that issues the 'Zero Waste' certificate and awards it to those organisations that recover more than 90% of the waste they generate. Therefore, it is important to clarify that having this seal does not indicate the non-generation of waste, but rather an organised management that makes it possible to reduce its generation, prepare it to be used again or transform it into new raw materials to reintroduce it into the value chain.<br>\n<br>\nZero waste therefore from a certification point of view means sending as little waste as possible to landfill, recycling and valorising each of the waste fractions generated.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company has reached the category of \"\" zero waste \"\", either through a certification such as AENOR \"\" Zero waste \"\" or through the management of a specialized external company (for example Saica Natur in the case of Auchan Spain).<br>\nThe company must be certified \"\" zero waste \"\" in all its points of sale in Spain.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- If you have an international presence and meet this condition only in a country outside of Spain<br>\n- If the company is certified \"\" zero residue \"\" only in some points of sale in Spain.<br>\n- We did not find any statement in this regard<br>\n- The company declares that it has revalued at least 90% of its waste, but does not have any certification or external company to verify this.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Zero waste in all establishments+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_waste_in_all_establishments+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_waste_in_all_establishments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826526,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Zero waste certification in all establishments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_waste_certification_in_all_establishments.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Zero waste certification in all establishments",
      "question": "The company is declared and / or certified as zero waste in more than 10 of its facilities.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>We consider it a very important first step for retailers to start certifying at least part of their establishments as zero waste.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br><br>- The company has reached the category of \"\" zero waste \"\", either through a certification such as AENOR \"\" Zero waste \"\" or through the management of a specialized external company (for example Saica Natur in the case of Auchan Spain) in at least 10 of its facilities.<br>These can be logistics platforms or stores both in Spain and in foreign subsidiaries<br><br><br>We will assign a \"NO\" if:<br><br>- If the company has an international presence and meet this condition only in a country outside of Spain. Or:<br>- If the company is certified \"\" zero residue \"\" only in some points of sale in Spain. Or:<br>- We did not find any statement in this regard. Or:<br>- The company declares that it has revalued at least 90% of its waste, but does not have any certification or external company to verify this.<br><br>This information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br><br>- Annual memory<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>- Sustainability Report<br>- Environmental Report<br>- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_waste_certification_in_all_establishments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826537,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+No distribution of advertising support on paper",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+No_distribution_of_advertising_support_on_paper.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "No distribution of advertising support on paper",
      "question": "The company does not distribute advertising material on paper.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In the case of supermarkets, brochures are a very effective promotional tool to publicise their assortment, novelties and promotions, although very inefficient from a production point of view, as thousands of catalogues end up in the rubbish bin without even being read.<br>\n From an environmental point of view it is a completely dispensable waste load, especially in the digital age in which we live.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- If the company does not use physical advertising material such as brochures, flyers, product catalogs, etc ...<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- We check the presence of advertising material in any of the company's stores.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be verified in any physical store of the evaluated supermarket or we can consult the reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+No distribution of advertising support on paper+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+No_distribution_of_advertising_support_on_paper+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+No_distribution_of_advertising_support_on_paper+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826548,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+5% waste reduction per m2 vs previous year",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_waste_reduction_per_m2_vs_previous_year.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "5% waste reduction per m2 vs previous year",
      "question": "The company has reduced its total waste per m2 by 5% vs. the previous year.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric measures the intensity ratio of waste generated by a company with which we intend to evaluate and compare homogeneously the degree of waste generation in relation to a unit, in this case the commercial area, and thus allow us to contextualise the efficiency of the company according to its size and compare it with that of its competitors.",
      "methodology": "In case of not obtaining directly the data of reduction of waste per m2 in the reports of the companies, we will have to start calculating the intensity of waste per m2 for the last 2 years:<br>\n<br>\nIntensity of waste generated per m2 of surface (Kg / m2) = Total waste generated (Tn) / Total commercial surface (m2)<br>\n<br>\nThe data of the total commercial area in m2 will be obtained from the reports published on the chain's website for the year evaluated. The company may not publish it, but may use an intensity indicator based on its surface (of CO2 emissions per m2, for example), from which the total surface of the chain can be calculated.<br>\nFailing that, we may use the data published by some specialized reference sources such as Alimarket, Inforetail, DataRetail, Statista, Nielsen, Kantar, IRI Infoscan, ...<br>\nThis data must be homogeneous and comparable for the 2 years analyzed, so the source of data on the commercial area must be the same. Thus, if we use Alimarket to find out the total commercial area of ??a chain in a given year, we must use the same source to compare with the previous year.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The reduction in waste intensity per m2 is at least 5% compared to the previous year<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The reduction in waste intensity per m2 is less than 5% compared to the previous year<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The intensity of waste per m2 has increased compared to the previous year<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company does not publish enough data on its generated waste to be able to calculate this reduction.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+5% waste reduction per m2 vs previous year+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_waste_reduction_per_m2_vs_previous_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_waste_reduction_per_m2_vs_previous_year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826559,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Waste reduction policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_reduction_policy.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Waste reduction policy",
      "question": "The company develops a waste reduction policy with specific measures and actions.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "With this metric we want to assess that companies communicate a real policy and strategy focused on waste reduction with specific initiatives carried out in the year of evaluation and concrete and dated commitments.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company addresses the issue of waste management by detailing its concrete actions and objectives to reduce waste (at least 4 actions).<br>\nThe following is a summary of best practices in the sector as an example:<br>\n<br>\n- Recycling of all cardboard, plastic, poliexpan and wood waste by authorised waste managers. <br>\n- Optimisation of order management to avoid surpluses in shop. -- Development of initiatives against food waste. <br>\n- Donation of non-marketable food (the amount and the receiving entity must be communicated).<br>\n- Recycling of 100% of cardboard, plastic, poliexpan<br>\nand wood through authorised waste managers<br>\n- Waste reduction targets with specific % and deadlines.<br>\n- Food waste reduction targets with specific % and deadlines.<br>\n- Recycling of 100% of the waste managed in the logistics platforms.<br>\nlogistics platforms.<br>\n- AENOR Zero Waste Certification or equivalent.<br>\n- Development of textile recycling initiatives.<br>\n- Replacement or recycling of expanded polystyrene (EPS) fish boxes.<br>\n- Projects related to the reduction, reuse or recycling of WEEE (Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment).<br>\n- Packaging eco-design<br>\n- Quantifiable and time-bound plastic packaging reduction targets.<br>\n- Reverse logistics processes, from the shops to the platforms and supplier companies, which<br>\nplatforms and supplier companies, which allow for the correct<br>\nreuse and recycling of waste.<br>\n- Reuse of logistics packaging (pallets, boxes, etc.).<br>\n- Recycling of LDPE plastic films: <br>\n- Specific training in waste management.<br>\n- Prohibition of the use of plastic shrink wrapping to protect cardboard display boxes.<br>\n- Use of non-recyclable materials in incineration plants to obtain energy.<br>\nWe will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question also if :<br>\n- The company already recovers and recycles more than 90% of its waste in all its facilities or is certified \"zero waste\".<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not communicate at least 4 concrete waste reduction actions or targets. Or:<br>\n- The company only issues general declarations without specifics, quantifiable basis or timeframe.<br>\nSome examples of this type of statements can be :<br>\n<br>\n- \"We establish a correct management of the recoverable waste we generate\".<br>\n- \"We promote the Circular Economy\".<br>\n- \"We support sustainability through research.<br>\n- \"We give priority to eco-design,... recyclability\", etc... <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Waste reduction policy+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_reduction_policy+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_reduction_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826570,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Waste recovery and recycling rate higher than 90%",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_recovery_and_recycling_rate_higher_than_90.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Waste recovery and recycling rate higher than 90%",
      "question": "The company has recycled or recovered more than 90% of its declared waste.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "According to Directive 2008/98/EC on waste, recovery is defined as:<br>\n<br>\nOperation whose main result is that the waste serves a useful purpose by replacing other materials that would otherwise have been used to fulfil a particular function.<br>\nPreparation of the waste to fulfil a particular function, either in the facility or in the economy at large. <br>\nRecycling involves a process aimed at converting waste into new products or raw materials for further use. The difference is therefore very subtle, the former being considered as the preparation of the waste and the latter as the direct re-use of the waste as a new product or raw material.<br>\nIn practice, all waste that supermarkets do not recover would go to landfill",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to have recovered at least 90% of its total annual waste generated in relation to the previous year, or publishes the necessary data to calculate it (total waste generated and total waste recovered for the last 2 years).<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish sufficient data on its waste generated to be able to calculate this reduction.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company declares to have recovered less than 90% of its total annual waste generated compared to the previous year, or publishes the necessary data to prove that it has reduced it by less than 90% or even increased it.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Waste recovery and recycling rate higher than 90%+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_recovery_and_recycling_rate_higher_than_90+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_recovery_and_recycling_rate_higher_than_90+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826581,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Waste recovery and recycling rate higher than 80%",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_recovery_and_recycling_rate_higher_than_80.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Waste recovery and recycling rate higher than 80%",
      "question": "The company has recycled or recovered more than 80% of its declared waste.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "According to Directive 2008/98/EC on waste, recovery is defined as:<br>\n<br>\nOperation whose main result is that the waste serves a useful purpose by replacing other materials that would otherwise have been used to fulfil a particular function.<br>\nPreparation of the waste to fulfil a particular function, either in the facility or in the economy at large. <br>\nRecycling involves a process aimed at converting waste into new products or raw materials for further use. The difference is therefore very subtle, the former being considered as the preparation of the waste and the latter as the direct re-use of the waste as a new product or raw material.<br>\nIn practice, all waste that supermarkets do not recover would go to landfill",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to have recovered at least 80% of its total annual waste generated in relation to the previous year, or publishes the necessary data to calculate it (Total waste generated and Total waste recovered for the last 2 years).<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish sufficient data on its waste generated to be able to calculate this reduction.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company declares to have recovered less than 80% of its total annual waste generated compared to the previous year, or publishes the necessary data to prove that it has reduced it by less than 80% or even increased it.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Waste recovery and recycling rate higher than 80%+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_recovery_and_recycling_rate_higher_than_80+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_recovery_and_recycling_rate_higher_than_80+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826592,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Waste recovery and recycling rate higher than 70%",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_recovery_and_recycling_rate_higher_than_70.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Waste recovery and recycling rate higher than 70%",
      "question": "The company has recycled or recovered more than 60% of its declared waste.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "According to Directive 2008/98/EC on waste, recovery is defined as:<br>\n<br>\nOperation whose main result is that the waste serves a useful purpose by replacing other materials that would otherwise have been used to fulfil a particular function.<br>\nPreparation of the waste to fulfil a particular function, either in the facility or in the economy at large. <br>\nRecycling involves a process aimed at converting waste into new products or raw materials for further use. The difference is therefore very subtle, the former being considered as the preparation of the waste and the latter as the direct re-use of the waste as a new product or raw material.<br>\nIn practice, all waste that supermarkets do not recover would go to landfill",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to have recovered at least 70% of its total annual waste generated in relation to the previous year, or publishes the necessary data to calculate it (Total waste generated and Total waste recovered for the last 2 years).<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish sufficient data on its waste generated to be able to calculate this reduction.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company declares to have recovered less than 70% of its total annual waste generated compared to the previous year, or publishes the necessary data to prove that it has reduced it by less than 70% or even increased it.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Waste recovery and recycling rate higher than 70%+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_recovery_and_recycling_rate_higher_than_70+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_recovery_and_recycling_rate_higher_than_70+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826603,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+100% recycling of cardboard, paper, wood and plastic",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_recycling_of_cardboard_paper_wood_and_plastic.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "100% recycling of cardboard, paper, wood and plastic",
      "question": "The company declares that it facilitates the recycling of 100% of the cardboard, plastic, paper and wood generated in its facilities by authorized managers.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "As a retailer, the main resources that supermarkets can directly give a second life to are the packaging used for transporting goods. This mainly consists of cardboard and flexible plastics. Shops must participate in the recycling of these materials by separating and recovering their waste as much as possible.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company sends at least 100% of its cardboard, paper, wood and flexible plastics materials (packaging used for the transport of goods) to official managers (Authorised Integrated Management Systems,..)<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish data in this respect <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the company's website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+100% recycling of cardboard, paper, wood and plastic+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_recycling_of_cardboard_paper_wood_and_plastic+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_recycling_of_cardboard_paper_wood_and_plastic+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826614,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Recycling rate increase vs previous year",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recycling_rate_increase_vs_previous_year.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Recycling rate increase vs previous year",
      "question": "The company has increased its recovery / recycling rate compared to the previous year.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.2 Performance and recycling policy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to assess companies' efforts in recycling and waste recovery",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company publicly states in one of its reports that it has increased its waste recycling rate, or we can compare its performance against the previous year (publishes its previous year's data in its latest report). <br>\nFor the time being we do not require a minimum percentage, given the low compliance of the sector with this indicator. <br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company's recycling/valuation ratio is already above 95%, so there is little room for improvement.<br>\n<br>\nA \"NO\" will be assigned if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish sufficient data on recycling to allow us to know if it has increased its recycling rate compared to the previous year.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company has reduced its recycling rate compared to the previous year.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the company's website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Recycling rate increase vs previous year+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recycling_rate_increase_vs_previous_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recycling_rate_increase_vs_previous_year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826625,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Provision of physical points for post-consumer recycling",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Provision_of_physical_points_for_post_consumer_recycling.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Provision of physical points for post-consumer recycling",
      "question": "The company offers its clients collection points for toxic materials or post-consumer recycling.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.2 Performance and recycling policy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to assess companies' efforts in recycling and waste recovery",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company makes waste collection systems available to its customers.<br>\nWe consider the presence of collection systems for at least the following waste:<br>\n<br>\n- coffee capsules<br>\n- batteries<br>\n- energy accumulators<br>\n- waste oil<br>\n- electrical and electronic equipment<br>\n- textile materials.<br>\n<br>\n  The delivery of these materials to authorized plants that are responsible for the reuse of a part and the cutting of the rest must be guaranteed to guarantee their subsequent recycling.<br>\n <br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- Relevant sources are omitted within each type of emissions, such as<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be verified by visiting the supermarket stores (although the fact that some stores do not have recycling points cannot be generalized) or in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Provision of physical points for post-consumer recycling+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Provision_of_physical_points_for_post_consumer_recycling+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Provision_of_physical_points_for_post_consumer_recycling+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826636,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Recycling of high impact materials",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recycling_of_high_impact_materials.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Recycling of high impact materials",
      "question": "The company has or collaborates with programs related to the recycling of high impact waste (Bricks, coffee capsules).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.2 Performance and recycling policy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to assess companies' efforts in recycling and waste recovery",
      "methodology": "This question should not be confused with the previous one regarding the presence of clean points for the collection of materials and post-consumer products. What we consider here is participation in projects that go beyond the simple provision of containers so that customers can recycle batteries, clothes, etc ...<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to participate in projects and initiatives of third parties or its own in order to facilitate the recycling of packaging materials or products with a high environmental impact and complex recyclability such as bricks, coffee capsules, material, Waste from<br>\nElectrical Equipment (WEEE), textile, etc.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- We did not find statements about it in any of the company's reports.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Recycling of high impact materials+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recycling_of_high_impact_materials+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recycling_of_high_impact_materials+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826647,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the recycled waste rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_recycled_waste_rate.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the recycled waste rate",
      "question": "The company publishes the rate of its recycled, recovered and dumped waste.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.3 Publication of waste generated\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"GRI 306-2 Waste by Type and Disposal Method\" standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish the waste they generate based on the common thread of our assessment methodology: What is not measured cannot be improved. What is good that is not published does not exist",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes its waste recycling or recovery ratio expressed as % of waste recycled or recovered as a percentage of total waste generated.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company does not report its waste recycling ratio, but publishes the necessary data to be able to calculate it directly. <br>\nTo do this, we need to find in its reports the total weight of its waste generated and the weight of its waste recycled. <br>\n<br>\n  Calculation : <br>\nRatio of recycled waste = Total weight of recycled waste (Tn) / Total weight of waste generated (Tn) X 100.<br>\n<br>\nA \"NO\" will be assigned if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish its waste recycling or recovery ratio. Or:<br>\n- The company does not publish sufficient data on waste generated or recycled to calculate this ratio.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the company's website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the recycled waste rate+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_recycled_waste_rate+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_recycled_waste_rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826658,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of waste broken down by type",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_waste_broken_down_by_type.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of waste broken down by type",
      "question": "The company publishes the weight of its annual waste broken down by type.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.3 Publication of waste generated\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"GRI 306-2 Waste by Type and Disposal Method\" standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish the waste they generate based on the common thread of our assessment methodology: What is not measured cannot be improved. What is good that is not published does not exist",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes data on the weight (in tonnes) of its waste generated, broken down at least by the main types: paper and cardboard, plastic, wood, scrap, etc..<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company only publishes data on the total weight of its waste generated without a breakdown by type of waste.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the company's website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of waste broken down by type+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_waste_broken_down_by_type+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_waste_broken_down_by_type+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826669,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the total weight of waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_total_weight_of_waste.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the total weight of waste",
      "question": "The company publishes the total weight of its generated waste.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.3 Publication of waste generated\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"GRI 306-2 Waste by Type and Disposal Method\" standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish the waste they generate based on the common thread of our assessment methodology: What is not measured cannot be improved. What is good that is not published does not exist",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes at least the total weight (in tonnes) of its waste generated, even if it does not break down its main types of waste.<br>\n<br>\nWe will give a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company only publishes partial waste data on the total weight of its waste generated without a breakdown by waste type.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the company's website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the total weight of waste+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_total_weight_of_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_total_weight_of_waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826680,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the weight of paper used for advertising",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_paper_used_for_advertising.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the weight of paper used for advertising",
      "question": "The company publishes the total weight of the paper consumed in advertising.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.3 Publication of waste generated\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"GRI 306-2 Waste by Type and Disposal Method\" standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish the waste they generate based on the common thread of our assessment methodology: What is not measured cannot be improved. What is good that is not published does not exist",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes the total weight of paper used for advertising (flyers, brochures, catalogues, etc.).<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company does not make use of physical advertising material (flyers, brochures, leaflets, etc.).<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- There are no statements in the reports<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the weight of paper used for advertising+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_paper_used_for_advertising+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_paper_used_for_advertising+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826691,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of waste intensity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_waste_intensity.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of waste intensity",
      "question": "The company publishes an indicator that measures the intensity of its waste.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.3 Publication of waste generated\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"GRI 306-2 Waste by Type and Disposal Method\" standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish the waste they generate based on the common thread of our assessment methodology: What is not measured cannot be improved. What is good that is not published does not exist",
      "methodology": "We value that the company records some relative indicator that measures the emission intensity of its waste to demonstrate its environmental performance in relation to its size or production capacity and at the same time to be able to control the generation and reduction of waste. It can be in % per Tn of manufactured product, based on Kg of product served, m2 of commercial surface, etc... .<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"YES\" to this question if... :<br>\n<br>\n- Scope 1 and 2 emissions are clearly published separately by adding the source breakdown of the emissions included in each type.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- Relevant sources are omitted within each type of emissions, such as: \"Emissions of scope 1 and 2 are published separately.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of waste intensity+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_waste_intensity+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_waste_intensity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826702,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Zero waste target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_waste_target.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Zero waste target",
      "question": "The company has set a zero waste target by 2030.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.4 Waste reduction targets\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' waste reduction efforts against specific targets. We exclude from this question those targets related to other areas of the assessment, such as food waste",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"YES\" if the company declares textually to set a target of \"zero waste\" by 2030 as a deadline in all its establishments. <br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- We did not find any statements in any of the reports.<br>\n- The time target is longer than 2030 <br>\n- No deadline is set<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Zero waste target+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 22,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_waste_target+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_waste_target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826713,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+20% waste reduction target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+20_waste_reduction_target.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "20% waste reduction target",
      "question": "The company has set a waste reduction target of at least 20% by 2025.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.4 Waste reduction targets\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' waste reduction efforts against specific targets. We exclude from this question those targets related to other areas of the assessment, such as food waste",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares a reduction target of at least 20% of its waste by 2025. <br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company presents temporary targets of \"zero waste\" for at least 20% of its shops (or another indicator that corresponds approximately to a 20% reduction of its waste by 2025). <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+20% waste reduction target+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+20_waste_reduction_target+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+20_waste_reduction_target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826724,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the weight of organic waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_organic_waste.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the weight of organic waste",
      "question": "The company publishes the total weight of its organic waste broken down by type.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "With this metric we aim to check that the company includes food waste within its annual waste inventory by publishing the total weight of its organic waste from meat, fish, fruit and vegetables, bread, dairy, etc",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares the total weight of organic waste and each of its main sources (meat, fish, fruit and vegetables, bread, dairy, etc). We ask for a breakdown of at least 3 categories.<br>\n<br>\n Not to be confused with the total % of recovered organic waste (evaluated in another question).<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company only publishes the weight of its recovered organic waste. This practice is very common among the supermarkets assessed so far.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company only publishes the total weight of its organic waste without any breakdown.   <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the weight of organic waste+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_organic_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_organic_waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826735,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Recovery of organic waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recovery_of_organic_waste.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Recovery of organic waste",
      "question": "Does the company recover at least part of its organic waste?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.5 Food waste management\"\"<br>With this metric we aim to assess supermarkets' efforts on Food Waste by focusing on how they manage and publish their various measures and targets to prevent and reduce it.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br><br>- The company demonstrates that it recovers at least part of its organic waste with some data (weight in tonnes of recovered organic waste (e.g. Eroski).<br>Or:<br>- In the case of transnational companies, a \"YES\" is given if the % of organic waste recycling is significant (&gt; 70%) in at least one country, even if it is not Spain (e.g. DIA). <br><br>We will assign a \"NO\" if :<br><br>- The company only declares to recover its organic waste, but does not publish data.<br><br>This information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br><br>- Annual Report<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>- Sustainability Report<br>- Environmental Report<br>- Carbon Footprint Report<br>- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Recovery of organic waste+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recovery_of_organic_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recovery_of_organic_waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826746,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the organic waste recovery rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_organic_waste_recovery_rate.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the organic waste recovery rate",
      "question": "The company publishes the recovery rate for its organic waste.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.5 Food waste management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess supermarkets' efforts on Food Waste by focusing on how they manage and publish their various measures and targets to prevent and reduce it.",
      "methodology": "<table cellpadding=\"0\" border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" style=\"width: 739px; height: 1066px;\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr style=\"mso-height-source: userset; height: 15.75pt;\">\r\n<td style=\"height: 15.75pt; width: 739px;\">\r\n<p>Asignaremos un \"SI\" a esta pregunta si :<br><br>• La empresa publica su tasa o ratio de valorizacion, recuperación o reciclaje de residuos orgánicos expresada en % de residuos orgánicos valorizados sobre el total de residuos orgánicos generados, o bien :</p>\r\n<p><br>• La empresa no comunica su su tasa  de valorizacion de residuos orgánicos, pero publica los datos necesarios para poder calcularlo directamente. <br>Para esto debemos encontrar en sus informes el peso total de sus residuos orgánicos generados y el de sus residuos orgánicos reciclados, valorizados o recuperados. <br><br>  Cálculo : <br>Tasa de residuos orgánicos valorizados = Peso total de residuos orgánicos valorizados (Tn) / Peso total de residuos orgánicos generados (Tn) X 100<br><br>Asignaremos un “NO” si :<br><br>• La empresa no publica su ratio de reciclaje o valorización de residuos orgánicos<br>• La empresa no publica datos sobre residuos orgánicos suficientes como para calcular este ratio<br><br>Esta información la podremos encontrar en cualquiera de los siguientes informes publicados en la página web de las compañías :<br><br>• Memoria Anual<br>• Informe de Responsabilidad Social Corporativa<br>• Informe de Sostenibilidad<br>• Informe Medioambiental<br>• Informe sobre Huella de Carbono<br>• Estado de Información No Financiera (EINF)</p>\r\n</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the organic waste recovery rate+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_organic_waste_recovery_rate+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_organic_waste_recovery_rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826757,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Target to reduce food waste by 25%",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Target_to_reduce_food_waste_by_25.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Target to reduce food waste by 25%",
      "question": "The company sets a food waste reduction target of at least 25% by 2025.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.5 Food waste management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess supermarkets' efforts on Food Waste by focusing on how they manage and publish their various measures and targets to prevent and reduce it.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company states a concrete target to reduce the total weight of its waste generated by at least 25% by 2025.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company has already managed to reduce its food waste by 50% in previous years, it is close to zero or if at least 30% of its food waste is recovered. <br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- No such statements can be found in any of the reports.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Target to reduce food waste by 25%+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Target_to_reduce_food_waste_by_25+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Target_to_reduce_food_waste_by_25+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826768,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Non-marketable food donation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Non_marketable_food_donation.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Non-marketable food donation",
      "question": "The company has a systematic non-marketable food donation program and publishes its data.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In this metric, we include only donations of food in perfect conditions for consumption, but not suitable for commercialisation, in order to fight against food waste by avoiding the waste of millions of tonnes per year (1.3 billion tonnes in the world to be exact).<br>\ntonnes in the world to be more precise). <br>\nWe therefore do not take into account donations made by customers in the shops, even if the collection campaign was carried out on the company's premises.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"YES\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to make donations that have involved at least 50% of its shops, involve more than 100 tonnes of food or at least 70% of the supermarket's total unmarketable food.<br>\nThe company must specify that the donation is linked to reducing food waste and carry out this practice on a programmatic basis at least annually and provide some quantitative data (the % or number of shops that have participated, detail the total weight of food donated or % of total unmarketable food) and to whom it is destined (food bank, soup kitchens, animal welfare association, NGOs, etc.).  <br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The donations declared by the company correspond to marketable food (those made by clients or by the company itself in solidarity campaigns, for example). <br>\n- The company declares to make donations, but omits some of the following data: the % or number of shops that have participated, the total weight or quantity of food donated or % over the total of non-marketable food, name of the receiving entity (food bank, social canteens, animal association, NGOs,...).  <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Non-marketable food donation+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Non_marketable_food_donation+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Non_marketable_food_donation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826779,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Promotion against food waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_against_food_waste.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Promotion against food waste",
      "question": "The company has developed or participated in awareness / promotion campaigns against food waste.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "With this metric, we aim to assess the company's efforts to raise awareness of food waste among consumers and employees.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company organises or participates in initiatives to raise awareness on food waste. We value the involvement in at least 2 actions, among which we include below some examples in the sector:<br>\n<br>\n- Support to campaigns against food waste (MAPA \"More food, less waste\", \"Anti-waste week\", etc.).<br>\n- Participation in the AECOC initiative \"Food has no waste, make the most of it\".<br>\nFood has no waste, make the most of it\"\".<br>\n- Sponsorship of competitions (e.g. \"Brainstorming against waste\", \"Anti-waste recipes\").<br>\n- Participation in R&D actions to help new companies to minimise food waste.<br>\n- Organisation of workshops on how to make better use of food.<br>\n <br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Promotion against food waste+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_against_food_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_against_food_waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826790,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Innovative initiatives against food waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Innovative_initiatives_against_food_waste.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Innovative initiatives against food waste",
      "question": "The company develops or collaborates with innovative initiatives to reduce food waste.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.5 Food waste management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess supermarkets' efforts on Food Waste by focusing on how they manage and publish their various measures and targets to prevent and reduce it.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to develop, participate or collaborate in any innovative initiative to curb food waste.<br>\nExamples of actions and initiatives collected in the supermarket sector include :<br>\n<br>\n- Collaboration with APPs and startups specialising in food waste and circular economy (Tafel, Too Good To Go, Refood, HopHopFood ).<br>\n- Proprietary tool to adjust daily fresh produce orders<br>\ndaily fresh produce orders.<br>\n- Bio-waste recovery projects.<br>\n- Reuse and recycling of waste (e.g. meat by-products, bread, flour, pasta, etc.) for the production of flour for animal feed, biogas or energy recovery. - - <br>\n- Organic waste converted into organic earthworm hummus. <br>\n- Oils that are recycled into Biodiesel <br>\n- Organic waste for composting<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Innovative initiatives against food waste+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Innovative_initiatives_against_food_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Innovative_initiatives_against_food_waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826801,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Incentives for the sale of products about to expire",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Incentives_for_the_sale_of_products_about_to_expire.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Incentives for the sale of products about to expire",
      "question": "The company encourages the purchase of products about to expire with promotions.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This question, together with the following one, takes into account the company's efforts to optimise the marketing and/or recovery of products excluded from sales channels, which would otherwise be discarded.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company applies purchase incentives to products that are close to their expiry date (discount, \"2 for one\" or \"buy get\" promotion, etc.), or extends the best-before date for its own-brand products. <br>\n <br>\nThis information can be checked \"in situ\" in one of the company's shops or in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Incentives for the sale of products about to expire+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Incentives_for_the_sale_of_products_about_to_expire+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Incentives_for_the_sale_of_products_about_to_expire+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826812,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Incentives for the sale of \"ugly\" fruits and vegetables",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Incentives_for_the_sale_of_ugly_fruits_and_vegetables.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Incentives for the sale of \"ugly\" fruits and vegetables",
      "question": "The company encourages the marketing of so-called \"ugly\" fruits and vegetables.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This question takes into account the company's efforts to optimise the marketing and/or valorisation of products excluded from sales channels, which would otherwise be discarded.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company applies purchasing incentives to those fruits and vegetables classified as second class because of their appearance or size, but with full nutritional and organoleptic quality.<br>\nExamples of incentives can be discounts, gifts, promotion and marketing, etc....<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be checked \"in situ\" in one of the company's shops or in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Incentives for the sale of \"ugly\" fruits and vegetables+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Incentives_for_the_sale_of_ugly_fruits_and_vegetables+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Incentives_for_the_sale_of_ugly_fruits_and_vegetables+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826823,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the weight of hazardous waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_hazardous_waste.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the weight of hazardous waste",
      "question": "The company registers and publishes the weight of hazardous waste generated.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.6 Hazardous waste management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"GRI 306-2 Waste by Type and Disposal Method\" standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish data related to the management and recycling of their hazardous waste.<br>\nIn the case of supermarkets, this waste can be batteries, fluorescent bulbs, used oil, car batteries and fluorescent bulbs containing mercury, electronic and computer equipment, toners, etc...<br>\nNot to be confused with hazardous waste collected from customers via in-store collection points",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company records and publishes the total weight of its hazardous waste generated (in tonnes or kg).<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the weight of hazardous waste+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_hazardous_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_hazardous_waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826834,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the recycling rate for hazardous waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_recycling_rate_for_hazardous_waste.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the recycling rate for hazardous waste",
      "question": "The company registers and publishes the recycling rate for its hazardous waste",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.6 Hazardous waste management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"GRI 306-2 Waste by Type and Disposal Method\" standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish data related to the management and recycling of their hazardous waste.<br>\nIn the case of supermarkets, this waste can be batteries, fluorescent bulbs, used oil, car batteries and fluorescent bulbs containing mercury, electronic and computer equipment, toners, etc...<br>\nNot to be confused with hazardous waste collected from customers via in-store collection points",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes the ratio of hazardous waste recycled expressed as :<br>\n<br>\nRatio of hazardous waste recycled = Total hazardous waste recycled (Tn ) / Total hazardous waste generated * 100<br>\nOr::<br>\n- The company does not publish the ratio of hazardous waste recycled, but provides the total tonnes of its hazardous waste generated and recycled in order to calculate it.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the recycling rate for hazardous waste+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_recycling_rate_for_hazardous_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_recycling_rate_for_hazardous_waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826845,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+100% recycling of hazardous waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_recycling_of_hazardous_waste.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "100% recycling of hazardous waste",
      "question": "The company recycles all the hazardous waste generated.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.6 Hazardous waste management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"GRI 306-2 Waste by Type and Disposal Method\" standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish data related to the management and recycling of their hazardous waste.<br>\nIn the case of supermarkets, this waste can be batteries, fluorescent bulbs, used oil, car batteries and fluorescent bulbs containing mercury, electronic and computer equipment, toners, etc...<br>\nNot to be confused with hazardous waste collected from customers via in-store collection points",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company recycles 100% of its generated hazardous waste and publishes the weight of its generated and recycled hazardous waste.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- the company only declares to recycle 100% of its hazardous waste, but does not publish data on the weight of its hazardous waste. <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the company's website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+100% recycling of hazardous waste+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_recycling_of_hazardous_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_recycling_of_hazardous_waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826856,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the weight of private label packaging",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_private_label_packaging.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the weight of private label packaging",
      "question": "The company publishes the total weight of containers and packaging of its own brand and breaks it down by type of material",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is based on GRI 301-1 Materials used by weight or volume, whereby companies are required to measure and report the total weight or volume of materials used to produce and package the organisation's main products and services during the reporting period.<br>\n<br>\nWe value in this metric the information on at least the Materials used in own-brand products and packaging declared to the collective systems of extended producer responsibility (ECOEMBES, ECOTIC, ECOPILAS, SIGAUS, AMBILAMP, etc.). It is a way of rewarding at least those companies that provide this type of information, however we will ask in future evaluations that companies have centralised information on the quantity and type of materials used in all their own branded products. Some companies are already working along these lines, such as Eroski, which states that it is developing a process to compile details of own-brand packaging materials in its systems and provide this information in future reports.<br>\n<br>\n GRI 301-1 Materials used by weight or volume:<br>\n The total weight or volume of materials used to produce and package the organization's main products and services during the reporting period",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes the total weight of its packaging broken down by type of material (plastic, steel, aluminium, paper, cardboard, wood, glass, etc.) and specifies that it includes packaging used in its own brand. <br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes the weight of the consumption of materials (paper and cardboard, plastics, aluminium and others). Specifies that the data is linked to the indicator \"GRI 301_1 Materials used by weight or volume\". but does not include the packaging used in its own brand. <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the weight of private label packaging+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_private_label_packaging+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_private_label_packaging+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826867,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reuse of 90% of logistics packaging",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reuse_of_90_of_logistics_packaging.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reuse of 90% of logistics packaging",
      "question": "The company declares to reuse more than 90% of its containers / logistics packaging (pallets, plastic boxes, etc).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "With a reusable crate packaging system, breakage and damage during the transport of fruit and vegetables is significantly reduced.<br>\n According to a study by the Fraunhofer Institute for Material Flow and Logistics (IML), the breakage rate for single-use cartons along the entire supply chain was 4.2%, while that for reusable crates was only 0.1%.<br>\nAdded to this is the environmental benefit of reusing the same carton in the transport of goods.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to reuse or recover at least 90% of the packaging material in logistic processes of transporting goods.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to reuse or recycle its logistic packaging or to apply more sustainable measures, but does not specify in which % or if it does it for all transport packaging.<br>\n<br>\nSuch statements can include<br>\n<br>\nWe replace single-use cardboard boxes with reusable boxes.<br>\n-We give a second life to packaging used for the transport of goods\".<br>\n- We implement logistics packaging recovery systems\".)<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Reuse of 90% of logistics packaging+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reuse_of_90_of_logistics_packaging+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reuse_of_90_of_logistics_packaging+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826878,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of the weight of packaging by 10%",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_the_weight_of_packaging_by_10.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of the weight of packaging by 10%",
      "question": "The company has reduced the total weight of its private label packaging by 10% in the last 3 years or has set specific targets to do so by the end of 2025.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.7 Management of containers and packaging\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we evaluate companies' efforts in packaging management by focusing on their actions on recycling, reduction and reuse, use of sustainable materials, publication of their data, prevention and education.",
      "methodology": "This metric refers to the total weight of supermarkets' own-brand product packaging expressed in absolute Tn, or relative to volumes sold, units sold etc.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to have reduced the weight of its own brand packaging by at least 10% over the last 3 years. This can refer only to plastic packaging<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company sets a target to reduce the weight of its own-brand packaging by at least 10% by 2025. Can refer to plastic only<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to have reduced the weight of its packaging or to commit to do so, but does not specify the amount or the deadline. <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of the weight of packaging by 10%+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_the_weight_of_packaging_by_10+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_the_weight_of_packaging_by_10+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826889,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Commitment to 100% recyclable /reusable packaging by 2030",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Commitment_to_100_recyclable_reusable_packaging_by_2030.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Commitment to 100% recyclable /reusable packaging by 2030",
      "question": "The company is committed to making 100% of its packaging recyclable or reusable by 2030.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is in line with the targets set by the European Union in the Plastics Strategy 2030 (The objective is that all plastic packaging on the European Union (EU) market should be recyclable or reusable by 2030, that the consumption of throwaway plastics should be reduced and that the deliberate use of microplastics should be restricted). This same demand includes the Global Plastics Declaration initiated by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation to make it a market standard for packaging to be 100% recyclable, reusable or compostable by 2025, to which many companies have signed up.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company sets a target that all its plastic packaging for own-brand products will be 100% recyclable or reusable by 2030 in accordance with EU requirements.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares its intention to make all its plastic packaging of own-brand products 100% recyclable or reusable by 2030 in accordance with EU requirements, but does not specify the deadline. <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Commitment to 100% recyclable /reusable packaging by 2030+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Commitment_to_100_recyclable_reusable_packaging_by_2030+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Commitment_to_100_recyclable_reusable_packaging_by_2030+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826900,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable packaging in home deliveries",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_packaging_in_home_deliveries.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Sustainable packaging in home deliveries",
      "question": "The company uses more sustainable or reusable packaging and packaging materials in its home deliveries or sets concrete goals to do so.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.7 Management of containers and packaging\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we evaluate companies' efforts in packaging management by focusing on their actions on recycling, reduction and reuse, use of sustainable materials, publication of their data, prevention and education.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company serves its home deliveries in lower environmental impact packaging such as paper instead of plastic, minimises packaging as much as possible or enables the reuse of bags or packaging material.<br>\n<br>\nHere are some best practices in the sector:<br>\n<br>\n- The possibility for customers to hand over plastic bags to the delivery staff to be passed on to the suppliers in charge of recycling.<br>\n- 100% recycled and recyclable cardboard used in online packaging.<br>\n- Expansion of order collection points in addition to the shops themselves. (This allows customers to bring their own packaging).<br>\n- Reusable baskets for Supermarket deliveries.<br>\n- Use of recycled cardboard boxes and FSC or PEFC certified paper bags to replace plastic. <br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- Relevant sources are omitted within each type of emissions, such as: - Use of recycled cardboard boxes and FSC or PEFC certified paper bags instead of plastic.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable packaging in home deliveries+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_packaging_in_home_deliveries+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_packaging_in_home_deliveries+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826911,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Measures to avoid overpacking",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_avoid_overpacking.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Measures to avoid overpacking",
      "question": "The company establishes concrete measures to avoid overpacking of its private label.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.7 Management of containers and packaging\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we evaluate companies' efforts in packaging management by focusing on their actions on recycling, reduction and reuse, use of sustainable materials, publication of their data, prevention and education.",
      "methodology": "We value in this metric the measures aimed at reducing or eliminating unnecessary packaging such as:<br>\n<br>\n- increase bulk sales of products such as legumes, frozen foods, beverages, etc.<br>\n- unpacking fruits and vegetables (it is not worth replacing plastic with biodegradable / compostable)<br>\n- install dispensers and / or implement returnable containers that avoid the accumulation of disposable containers<br>\n- remove trays for meat, fish, ...<br>\n<br>\nWe will also assess with a YES if there is a firm commitment on the part of the company to eliminate overpackaging of its products by 2025 (Eroski is an example in this regard).<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- Scope 1 and 2 emissions are clearly published separately by adding the breakdown of the sources of the emissions included in each type<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- Relevant sources are omitted within each type of emissions, such as<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Measures to avoid overpacking+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_avoid_overpacking+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_avoid_overpacking+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826922,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Materials recycling education",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Materials_recycling_education.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Materials recycling education",
      "question": "The company has developed internal and / or external education campaigns for the recycling of materials.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "With this metric we aim to assess the company's efforts to raise awareness and inform consumers and partners about recycling materials and thus promote their importance to our environment.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company organizes or participates in awareness and education initiatives on recycling. We value the involvement in at least 2 actions, among which we include below some examples in the sector:<br>\n<br>\n- Development or collaboration with mobile applications specialized in recycling<br>\n- Training workshops on recycling<br>\n- Disclosure and information to collaborators and clients through posters<br>\n- Periodic information through newsletters, blogs, magazines<br>\n<br>\n This information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Materials recycling education+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Materials_recycling_education+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Materials_recycling_education+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826933,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Roadmap against single-use plastic",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Roadmap_against_single_use_plastic.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Roadmap against single-use plastic",
      "question": "The company has a roadmap with dates and specific actions to reduce single-use plastics from its products and establishments through the progressive elimination of them.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta información se puede encontrar en el informe de Greenpeace \"\" Ranking de supermercados según su huella plástica \"\": https://es.greenpeace.org/es/trabagamos-en/consumismo/plasticos/ranking-de-supermercados- against- the-plastic / </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Greenpeace califica a los 8 supermercados más grandes del país de 1 (peor calificación) a 10 (mejor calificación) en función de su desempeño como resultado de las demandas de esta organización en cuanto a la gestión de plásticos.</span></span></p>\r\n<p>Asignaremos un \"SI\" a esta pregunta si :</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>• La compañía recibe una puntuación superior o igual a 5.0 sobre 10 en este  \"Ranking de Huella Plástica de los supermercados\" llevado a cabo a finales de 2018 y finales 2019 por la organización Greenpeace. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Roadmap against single-use plastic+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Roadmap_against_single_use_plastic+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Roadmap_against_single_use_plastic+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826944,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Investment plans in reusable packaging",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Investment_plans_in_reusable_packaging.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Investment plans in reusable packaging",
      "question": "The company has plans to invest in reusable packaging and new product distribution systems to reduce the amount of single-use packaging used for its products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta información se puede encontrar en el informe de Greenpeace \"\" Ranking de supermercados según su huella plástica \"\": https://es.greenpeace.org/es/trabagamos-en/consumismo/plasticos/ranking-de-supermercados- against- the-plastic / </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Greenpeace califica a los 8 supermercados más grandes del país de 1 (peor calificación) a 10 (mejor calificación) en función de su desempeño como resultado de las demandas de esta organización en cuanto a la gestión de plásticos.</span></span></p>\r\n<p>Asignaremos un \"SI\" a esta pregunta si :</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>• La compañía recibe una puntuación superior o igual a 5.0 sobre 10 en este  \"Ranking de Huella Plástica de los supermercados\" llevado a cabo a finales de 2018 y finales 2019 por la organización Greenpeace. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Investment plans in reusable packaging+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Investment_plans_in_reusable_packaging+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Investment_plans_in_reusable_packaging+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826955,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Absence of false solutions against plastic",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Absence_of_false_solutions_against_plastic.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Absence of false solutions against plastic",
      "question": "The company does not promote bogus solutions based on a throwaway culture.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta información se puede encontrar en el informe de Greenpeace \"\" Ranking de supermercados según su huella plástica \"\": https://es.greenpeace.org/es/trabagamos-en/consumismo/plasticos/ranking-de-supermercados- against- the-plastic / </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Greenpeace califica a los 8 supermercados más grandes del país de 1 (peor calificación) a 10 (mejor calificación) en función de su desempeño como resultado de las demandas de esta organización en cuanto a la gestión de plásticos.</span></span></p>\r\n<p>Asignaremos un \"SI\" a esta pregunta si :</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>• La compañía recibe una puntuación superior o igual a 5.0 sobre 10 en el  \"Ranking de Huella Plástica de los supermercados\" llevado a cabo a finales de 2018 y finales 2019 por la organización Greenpeace. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Absence of false solutions against plastic+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Absence_of_false_solutions_against_plastic+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Absence_of_false_solutions_against_plastic+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826966,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Elimination of single-use packaging for fruit and vegetables",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_single_use_packaging_for_fruit_and_vegetables.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Elimination of single-use packaging for fruit and vegetables",
      "question": "The company has concrete plans to phase out single-use fruit and vegetable packaging from\r\nprogressive form",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta submétrica se utiliza para evaluar la métrica: \"\" 2.8 Gestión de plásticos de un solo uso \"\" </span></span></span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta métrica se basa en el estudio de evaluación de Greenpeace España \"Ranking de la huella plástica de los supermercados\" realizado a finales de 2018 y finales de 2019. </span></span></span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Aunque el comportamiento de las empresas en lo que respeta al uso y disposición del plástico en sus puntos de venta conviene incluirlo en nuestra métrica anterior \"2.7 Gestión de embalajes\" creemos que por el impacto de este material en el medio ambiente merece ser tratado individualmente.</span></span></span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Para ello hemos utilizado el más completo y riguroso estudio de evaluación corporativa sobre uso de plásticos que existe actualmente en España y que se especializa en la calificación de supermercados, como este \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".</span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta información se puede encontrar en el informe de Greenpeace \"\" Ranking de supermercados según su huella plástica \"\": https://es.greenpeace.org/es/trabagamos-en/consumismo/plasticos/ranking-de-supermercados- against- the-plastic / </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Greenpeace califica a los 8 supermercados más grandes del país de 1 (peor calificación) a 10 (mejor calificación) en función de su desempeño como resultado de las demandas de esta organización en cuanto a la gestión de plásticos.</span></span></p>\r\n<p>Asignaremos un \"SI\" a esta pregunta si :</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>• La compañía recibe una puntuación superior o igual a 5.0 sobre 10 en el  \"Ranking de Huella Plástica de los supermercados\" llevado a cabo a finales de 2018 y finales 2019 por la organización Greenpeace. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Elimination of single-use packaging for fruit and vegetables+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_single_use_packaging_for_fruit_and_vegetables+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_single_use_packaging_for_fruit_and_vegetables+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826977,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Increase in bulk sales",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Increase_in_bulk_sales.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Increase in bulk sales",
      "question": "The company has concrete plans to increase its bulk sales.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta información se puede encontrar en el informe de Greenpeace \"\" Ranking de supermercados según su huella plástica \"\": https://es.greenpeace.org/es/trabagamos-en/consumismo/plasticos/ranking-de-supermercados- against- the-plastic / </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Greenpeace califica a los 8 supermercados más grandes del país de 1 (peor calificación) a 10 (mejor calificación) en función de su desempeño como resultado de las demandas de esta organización en cuanto a la gestión de plásticos.</span></span></p>\r\n<p>Asignaremos un \"SI\" a esta pregunta si :</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>• La compañía recibe una puntuación superior o igual a 5.0 sobre 10 en el  \"Ranking de Huella Plástica de los supermercados\" llevado a cabo a finales de 2018 y finales 2019 por la organización Greenpeace. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Increase in bulk sales+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Increase_in_bulk_sales+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Increase_in_bulk_sales+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826988,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Disposal of single-use bags",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Disposal_of_single_use_bags.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Disposal of single-use bags",
      "question": "The company has concrete plans to eliminate single-use bags from its stores, both at the checkout and in the section.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta información se puede encontrar en el informe de Greenpeace \"\" Ranking de supermercados según su huella plástica \"\": https://es.greenpeace.org/es/trabagamos-en/consumismo/plasticos/ranking-de-supermercados- against- the-plastic / </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Greenpeace califica a los 8 supermercados más grandes del país de 1 (peor calificación) a 10 (mejor calificación) en función de su desempeño como resultado de las demandas de esta organización en cuanto a la gestión de plásticos.</span></span></p>\r\n<p>Asignaremos un \"SI\" a esta pregunta si :</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>• La compañía recibe una puntuación superior o igual a 5.0 sobre 10 en el  \"Ranking de Huella Plástica de los supermercados\" llevado a cabo a finales de 2018 y finales 2019 por la organización Greenpeace. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Disposal of single-use bags+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Disposal_of_single_use_bags+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Disposal_of_single_use_bags+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6826999,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Disposal of non-recyclable single-use items",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Disposal_of_non_recyclable_single_use_items.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Disposal of non-recyclable single-use items",
      "question": "The company has plans to eliminate single-use and non-recyclable items such as silverware, plates or straws.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta información se puede encontrar en el informe de Greenpeace \"\" Ranking de supermercados según su huella plástica \"\": https://es.greenpeace.org/es/trabagamos-en/consumismo/plasticos/ranking-de-supermercados- against- the-plastic / </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Greenpeace califica a los 8 supermercados más grandes del país de 1 (peor calificación) a 10 (mejor calificación) en función de su desempeño como resultado de las demandas de esta organización en cuanto a la gestión de plásticos.</span></span></p>\r\n<p>Asignaremos un \"SI\" a esta pregunta si :</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>• La compañía recibe una puntuación superior o igual a 5.0 sobre 10 en el  \"Ranking de Huella Plástica de los supermercados\" llevado a cabo a finales de 2018 y finales 2019 por la organización Greenpeace. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Disposal of non-recyclable single-use items+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Disposal_of_non_recyclable_single_use_items+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Disposal_of_non_recyclable_single_use_items+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827010,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of plastic consumption data",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_plastic_consumption_data.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of plastic consumption data",
      "question": "The company makes public the data of plastic consumption in its products and establishments to be transparent about its plastic footprint.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta información se puede encontrar en el informe de Greenpeace \"\" Ranking de supermercados según su huella plástica \"\": https://es.greenpeace.org/es/trabagamos-en/consumismo/plasticos/ranking-de-supermercados- against- the-plastic / </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Greenpeace califica a los 8 supermercados más grandes del país de 1 (peor calificación) a 10 (mejor calificación) en función de su desempeño como resultado de las demandas de esta organización en cuanto a la gestión de plásticos.</span></span></p>\r\n<p>Asignaremos un \"SI\" a esta pregunta si :</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>• La compañía recibe una puntuación superior o igual a 5.0 sobre 10 en el  \"Ranking de Huella Plástica de los supermercados\" llevado a cabo a finales de 2018 y finales 2019 por la organización Greenpeace. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of plastic consumption data+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_plastic_consumption_data+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_plastic_consumption_data+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827021,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of single-use plastics in the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_single_use_plastics_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of single-use plastics in the supply chain",
      "question": "The company plans to work with suppliers of non-white label products with the goal of reducing single-use plastics from the supply chain.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta información se puede encontrar en el informe de Greenpeace \"\" Ranking de supermercados según su huella plástica \"\": https://es.greenpeace.org/es/trabagamos-en/consumismo/plasticos/ranking-de-supermercados- against- the-plastic / </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Greenpeace califica a los 8 supermercados más grandes del país de 1 (peor calificación) a 10 (mejor calificación) en función de su desempeño como resultado de las demandas de esta organización en cuanto a la gestión de plásticos.</span></span></p>\r\n<p>Asignaremos un \"SI\" a esta pregunta si :</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>• La compañía recibe una puntuación superior o igual a 5.0 sobre 10 en el  \"Ranking de Huella Plástica de los supermercados\" llevado a cabo a finales de 2018 y finales 2019 por la organización Greenpeace. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of single-use plastics in the supply chain+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_single_use_plastics_in_the_supply_chain+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_single_use_plastics_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827032,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Elimination of non-100% recyclable packaging",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_non_100_recyclable_packaging.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Elimination of non-100% recyclable packaging",
      "question": "The company plans to eliminate all packaging that is not 100% recyclable.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta información se puede encontrar en el informe de Greenpeace \"\" Ranking de supermercados según su huella plástica \"\": https://es.greenpeace.org/es/trabagamos-en/consumismo/plasticos/ranking-de-supermercados- against- the-plastic / </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Greenpeace califica a los 8 supermercados más grandes del país de 1 (peor calificación) a 10 (mejor calificación) en función de su desempeño como resultado de las demandas de esta organización en cuanto a la gestión de plásticos.</span></span></p>\r\n<p>Asignaremos un \"SI\" a esta pregunta si :</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>• La compañía recibe una puntuación superior o igual a 5.0 sobre 10 en el  \"Ranking de Huella Plástica de los supermercados\" llevado a cabo a finales de 2018 y finales 2019 por la organización Greenpeace. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Elimination of non-100% recyclable packaging+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_non_100_recyclable_packaging+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_non_100_recyclable_packaging+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827043,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of energy within the organization",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_energy_within_the_organization.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of energy within the organization",
      "question": "The company records and publishes its total energy consumption (Kw / h) within the organization.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is based on GRI 302-1 Energy consumption within the organisation.<br>\n<br>\nThe company should record and publish its total energy consumption (fuels and electricity) from renewable and non-renewable sources within the organisation in joules or multiples. This refers to the total consumption of sources within a company's physical spaces, which would typically be :<br>\n<br>\n- electricity consumption  <br>\n- heating consumption  <br>\n- cooling consumption  <br>\n- steam consumption",
      "methodology": "With this metric we intend to evaluate the specific commitment of companies to achieve a more efficient and sustainable energy consumption and the correct disclosure of their data and actions regarding:<br>\n <br>\n - Registration and publication of energy consumption data<br>\n - Energy saving and efficiency<br>\n - Renewable energy<br>\n <br>\n Wikirate vs. Eticonsum:<br>\n <br>\n Eticonsum's scoring system is over 100 points, where 0 is the lowest score and 100 is the highest, while the standardized Wikirate system is over 10. Thus, a score of 75/100 on the Eticonsum platform would equal 7 , 5/10 on Wikirate.org",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of energy within the organization+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_energy_within_the_organization+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_energy_within_the_organization+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827054,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of energy outside the organization",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_energy_outside_the_organization.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of energy outside the organization",
      "question": "The company records and publishes the total energy consumption (Kw / h) outside the organization.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is based on GRI 302-2 Energy consumption outside the organisation.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy consumption can also occur outside an organisation, i.e. through upstream (design, procurement of raw materials, production, transport) and downstream (product use, recycling, waste management) activities associated with the organisation's operations. This may include the use by consumers of the products sold by the organisation and the end-of-life treatment of these products. Quantifying energy consumption outside the organisation can provide the basis for calculating some of the other indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nAccording to the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the organisation can use the following upstream and downstream categories and activities of the \"Corporate Standard on Value Chain Accounting and Reporting (Scope 3)\", related to the GHG protocol, to identify energy consumption outside the organisation: <br>\n<br>\nCategories of upstream activities :<br>\n<br>\n1. purchased goods and services<br>\n2. capital goods<br>\n3.  Fuel and energy-related activities (not included in Content 302-1) <br>\n4. Upstream transport and distribution<br>\n5. Wastes generated from operations<br>\n6. Business travel <br>\n7. Employee commuting <br>\n8. Upstream leased assets Other upstream activities<br>\n<br>\n Categories of downstream activities : <br>\n<br>\n9. Transport and distribution downstream<br>\n10. Processing of products sold <br>\n11. Use of the products sold <br>\n12. End-of-life treatment of the sold products<br>\n13. Downstream leased assets",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes energy consumption outside the organization that includes at least one relevant source of consumption (For example, Eroski includes only fuel and electricity consumed by work trips by road, train and plane)<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of energy outside the organization+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_energy_outside_the_organization+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_energy_outside_the_organization+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827065,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the intensity of energy consumed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_intensity_of_energy_consumed.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the intensity of energy consumed",
      "question": "The company records and publishes its energy intensity ((eg, in relation to m2 of commercial space, revenue in euros, volume produced, etc.).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is based on GRI 302-3 Energy Intensity.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy intensity ratios define energy consumption in terms of the specific parameters of an organisation. <br>\nThey express the energy required per unit of activity, production or any other organisation-specific parameter. <br>\nIntensity ratios are often referred to as normalised environmental impact data. <br>\nTogether with the organisation's total energy consumption, which is reported in GRI Content 302-1 and 302-2, energy intensity helps to contextualise the organisation's efficiency, including in relation to other organisations.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- the company publishes its energy consumption ratio based on a denominator that allows its comparability with previous years and in the terms stipulated in the GRI 302-3 standard Energy intensity:<br>\nThe reporting organization must submit the following information:<br>\n<br>\nto. The organization's energy intensity ratio.<br>\nb. The specific parameters (denominator) that have been selected to calculate the ratio (eg, in relation to m2 of retail space, revenue in euros, volume produced, product units, number of employees, etc.).<br>\nc. The types of energy included in the intensity ratio (fuel, electricity, heating, cooling, steam or all).<br>\nd. If the ratio covers energy consumption within the organization, outside it, or both.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the intensity of energy consumed+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_intensity_of_energy_consumed+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_intensity_of_energy_consumed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827076,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of consumed energy broken down by primary sources",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_consumed_energy_broken_down_by_primary_sources.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of consumed energy broken down by primary sources",
      "question": "The company records and publishes its total energy consumption (Kw / h) broken down by primary sources.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.1 Registration and publication of the energy consumed\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the GRI 302: Energy standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish their energy consumption inside and outside the organisation.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes the breakdown of its energy consumption, at least electricity and fuel (gas, diesel, diesel, ...) used in its facilities and by its logistical means when these are controlled by the company.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company only reports on its total consumption without breaking down by its primary sources of consumption<br>\n- The company only publishes its electricity consumption<br>\n- The company only publishes fuel consumption<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of consumed energy broken down by primary sources+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_consumed_energy_broken_down_by_primary_sources+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_consumed_energy_broken_down_by_primary_sources+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827087,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the energy consumed in the last 2 years",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_energy_consumed_in_the_last_2_years.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the energy consumed in the last 2 years",
      "question": "The company publishes data on its energy consumption for at least the last 2 years.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.1 Registration and publication of the energy consumed\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the GRI 302: Energy standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish their energy consumption inside and outside the organisation.",
      "methodology": "We value that the company publishes its results from previous years, at least from the previous year, in order to be able to compare, evaluate and verify its progress. We evaluate with an SI if the company includes data from at least the previous year or another measure that helps to evaluate their historical energy performance such as the% reduction or increase in their consumption compared to the previous year<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the energy consumed in the last 2 years+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_energy_consumed_in_the_last_2_years+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_energy_consumed_in_the_last_2_years+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827098,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Measures to improve energy efficiency",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_improve_energy_efficiency.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Measures to improve energy efficiency",
      "question": "The company develops significant and concrete measures to improve its energy efficiency.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.2 Efficiency and energy saving\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we refer to the 2 most important aspects of sustainable energy consumption: Efficiency and Savings.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy saving involves a change in consumption habits such as avoiding energy waste.<br>\nEnergy efficiency is the fact of minimising the amount of energy needed to satisfy the demand without affecting its quality; it means replacing one piece of equipment with another that, with the same performance, consumes less electricity, for example.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it has implemented at least 3 specific and relevant measures to improve its energy efficiency.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company declares that it has implemented important measures to improve its energy efficiency and communicates the% of effective savings achieved thanks to them.<br>\n<br>\nSome examples of measures developed in the retail sector are:<br>\n<br>\n In stores :<br>\n<br>\n- Improvements in the insulation of both the envelope and the cold cabinets<br>\n- Use of LED lighting in all facilities<br>\n- Smart management of energy consumption<br>\n- Doors on frozen islands,<br>\n- Floating condensation in the refrigeration system to regulate the cooling according to the outside temperature, double glazing and - - Carpentry with thermal bridge break<br>\n- Home automation or remote management to control energy consumption<br>\n- Reduction of \"LEAKS\" in food cold facilities<br>\n- Self-supply of low impact energy (photovoltaic)<br>\n- Energy certifications<br>\n<br>\nIn offices :<br>\n<br>\n- Equipment: Energy Star certified appliances, automatic energy saving mode, timers to monitor energy after working hours, etc.<br>\n - Lighting: natural light, compact fluorescent lamps, presence sensors, lighting regulators, task lighting, LED lighting, etc.<br>\n - Air conditioning: programmable thermostats, timers, presence sensors, blocking of solar exposure on the walls, double-glazed windows, etc.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Measures to improve energy efficiency+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_improve_energy_efficiency+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_improve_energy_efficiency+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827109,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+25% energy saving target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+25_energy_saving_target.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "25% energy saving target",
      "question": "The company has set concrete energy saving targets of at least 25% by 2025.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is based on \"\"Content 302-4 Reduction of energy consumption\"\" of the \"\"GRI 302: Energy\"\" standard. <br>\n<br>\nGuidelines for Content 302-4 Reducing Energy Consumption :<br>\n<br>\nThe reporting organisation may prioritise the reporting of reduction initiatives that will be implemented in the reporting period and that can contribute significantly to reductions. Reduction initiatives and their targets can be described in the topic management approach.<br>\nReduction initiatives may include:<br>\n<br>\n- process redesign<br>\n- transformation and retrofitting<br>\n    equipment transformation and refurbishment<br>\n- behavioural changes;<br>\n- operational changes.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares a goal to reduce its energy consumption by at least 25% compared to its base year before 2025<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- Relevant sources are omitted within each type of emissions, such as<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+25% energy saving target+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+25_energy_saving_target+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+25_energy_saving_target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827120,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of energy intensity by 10%",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_energy_intensity_by_10.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of energy intensity by 10%",
      "question": "The company has reduced its energy intensity by 10% compared to the base year or previous year.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is based on \"Content 302-3 Energy Intensity\" of the \"GRI 302: Energy\" standard.\" <br>\n<br>\n The requirements in the terms required by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) for reporting by the organisation are as follows :<br>\n<br>\na. The energy intensity ratio of the organisation.<br>\nb. The specific parameters (denominator) that have been selected to calculate the ratio.<br>\nc. The types of energy included in the intensity ratio (fuel, electricity, heating, cooling, steam, or all),<br>\ncooling, steam, or all).<br>\nd. Whether the ratio covers energy consumption within the organisation, outside the organisation, or both.<br>\n<br>\nHowever, if the company does not publish its energy intensity and we have to calculate it on the basis of the available data, we will only consider the consumption corresponding to electricity, as this is the source that allows us the greatest homogeneity in the publications and therefore comparability between companies",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it has reduced its energy intensity (per m2 of commercial area, m3 of merchandise, sales unit or any other unit of measurement) by at least 10% in relation to its base year or previous year.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company does not publish its energy intensity, but this reduction of 10% can be calculated from the published historical consumption data (at least for the last 2 years) and its surface in m2.<br>\nIn this case, we will only consider the consumption corresponding to electricity, since it is the source that allows us greater homogeneity in the publications and therefore comparability between companies.<br>\n<br>\nElectricity consumption intensity = Total electric consumption in Kwh / Commercial surface in m2<br>\n<br>\nThe data of the total commercial area in m2 will be obtained from the reports published on the chain's website for the year evaluated. The company may not publish it, but may use an intensity indicator based on its surface (of CO2 emissions per m2, for example), from which the total surface of the chain can be calculated.<br>\nFailing that, we may use the data published by some specialized reference sources such as Alimarket, Inforetail, DataRetail, Statista, Nielsen, Kantar, IRI Infoscan, ...<br>\nThis data must be homogeneous and comparable for the 2 years analyzed, so the source of data on the commercial area must be the same. Thus, if we use Alimarket to find out the total commercial area of ??a chain in a given year, we must use the same source to compare with the previous year.<br>\n<br>\nNOTE: the fact that a company is supplied with electricity from renewable sources only affects its GHG emissions, not its consumption ratio, so its consumption must be included in the total electricity calculation<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of energy intensity by 10%+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_energy_intensity_by_10+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_energy_intensity_by_10+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827131,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction in energy intensity compared to the previous year",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_in_energy_intensity_compared_to_the_previous_year.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction in energy intensity compared to the previous year",
      "question": "The company has reduced its energy intensity from its base year or previous year.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is based on \"Content 302-3 Energy Intensity\" of the \"GRI 302: Energy\" standard.\" <br>\n<br>\n The requirements in the terms required by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) for reporting by the organisation are as follows :<br>\n<br>\na. The energy intensity ratio of the organisation.<br>\nb. The specific parameters (denominator) that have been selected to calculate the ratio.<br>\nc. The types of energy included in the intensity ratio (fuel, electricity, heating, cooling, steam, or all),<br>\ncooling, steam, or all).<br>\nd. Whether the ratio covers energy consumption within the organisation, outside the organisation, or both.<br>\n<br>\nHowever, if the company does not publish its energy intensity and we have to calculate it on the basis of the available data, we will only consider the consumption corresponding to electricity, as this is the source that allows us the greatest homogeneity in the publications and therefore comparability between companies",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it has reduced its energy intensity (per m2 of commercial area, m3 of merchandise, sales unit or any other unit of measure) in relation to its base year or previous year. Here we do not require any% reduction.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company does not publish its energy intensity, but we can calculate its reduction from the published historical data (at least for the last 2 years).<br>\nIn this case, we will only consider the consumption corresponding to electricity, since it is the source that allows us greater homogeneity in the publications and therefore comparability between companies.<br>\n<br>\nElectricity consumption intensity = Total electric consumption in Kwh / Commercial surface in m2<br>\n<br>\nThe data of the total commercial area in m2 will be obtained from the reports published on the chain's website for the year evaluated. The company may not publish it, but may use an intensity indicator based on its surface (of CO2 emissions per m2, for example), from which the total surface of the chain can be calculated.<br>\nFailing that, we may use the data published by some specialized reference sources such as Alimarket, Inforetail, DataRetail, Statista, Nielsen, Kantar, IRI Infoscan, ...<br>\nThis data must be homogeneous and comparable for the 2 years analyzed, so the source of data on the commercial area must be the same. Thus, if we use Alimarket to find out the total commercial area of ??a chain in a given year, we must use the same source to compare with the previous year.<br>\n<br>\nNOTE: the fact that a company sources its electricity from renewable sources only affects its GHG emissions, not its consumption ratio<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction in energy intensity compared to the previous year+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_in_energy_intensity_compared_to_the_previous_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_in_energy_intensity_compared_to_the_previous_year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827142,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy certification in all facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_certification_in_all_facilities.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Energy certification in all facilities",
      "question": "The company has some energy certification (ISO 50001 or similar) in all its facilities",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The energy certification of reference today is ISO 50001, an international standard developed by ISO (International Organization for Standardization or International Organization for Standardization) that aims to maintain and improve an organisation's energy management system, the purpose of which is to enable it to continuously improve energy efficiency, energy security, energy use and energy consumption in a systematic approach. This standard aims to enable organisations to continuously improve efficiency, energy-related costs, and greenhouse gas emissions.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it has a reference and recognized energy certification (ISO 50001 or equivalent) in all its facilities in Spain.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy certification in all facilities+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_certification_in_all_facilities+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_certification_in_all_facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827153,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy certification in some facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_certification_in_some_facilities.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Energy certification in some facilities",
      "question": "The company has some energy certification (ISO 50001 or similar) in some of its facilities.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The energy certification of reference today is ISO 50001, an international standard developed by ISO (International Organization for Standardization or International Organization for Standardization) that aims to maintain and improve an organisation's energy management system, the purpose of which is to enable it to continuously improve energy efficiency, energy security, energy use and energy consumption in a systematic approach. This standard aims to enable organisations to continuously improve efficiency, energy-related costs, and greenhouse gas emissions.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company has a reference energy certification (ISO 50001 or equivalent) in a facility in Spain or in most facilities in another country.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- Relevant sources are omitted within each type of emissions, such as<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy certification in some facilities+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_certification_in_some_facilities+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_certification_in_some_facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827164,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy savings of 5% compared to the previous year",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_savings_of_5_compared_to_the_previous_year.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Energy savings of 5% compared to the previous year",
      "question": "The company has achieved total energy savings of at least 5% compared to the previous year.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is based on \"\"Content 302-4 Reducing Energy Consumption\"\" of the \"\"GRI 302: Energy\"\" standard.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it has reduced at least 5% in total energy consumption compared to the previous year or from the base year established by the company<br>\nOr:<br>\nHere we count the total energy consumption declared by the company and which includes all its sources of consumption (electricity, logistic fuel, natural gas, etc.).<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company does not claim to have reduced at least 5% in energy consumption, but this reduction can be calculated from published historical data (at least from the last 2 years).<br>\n<br>\nHere we count the total energy consumption declared by the company and which includes all its sources of consumption (electricity, logistic fuel, natural gas, etc.).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy savings of 5% compared to the previous year+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_savings_of_5_compared_to_the_previous_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_savings_of_5_compared_to_the_previous_year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827175,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Electricity less than 100 Kwh per m2 of commercial surface",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Electricity_less_than_100_Kwh_per_m2_of_commercial_surface.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Electricity less than 100 Kwh per m2 of commercial surface",
      "question": "The company's electricity consumption ratio is less than 100 kWh per m2 of commercial space.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.2 Efficiency and energy saving\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we refer to the 2 most important aspects of sustainable energy consumption: Efficiency and Savings.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy saving involves a change in consumption habits such as avoiding energy waste.<br>\nEnergy efficiency is the fact of minimising the amount of energy needed to satisfy the demand without affecting its quality; it means replacing one piece of equipment with another that, with the same performance, consumes less electricity, for example.",
      "methodology": "Within the energy consumption of supermarket chains, we consider in this question only electricity for the purpose of intensity ratio in order to ensure homogeneity and comparability among all the companies evaluated. In any case, electricity consumption represents around the 80% of total energy consumption in this sector.<br>\n<br>\nIt is very unlikely that companies will publish their intensity of electricity consumption per m2 of surface area, so this ratio will have to be calculated from the electricity consumption published by the company and its total m2 of commercial surface with the formula:<br>\n<br>\nElectricity consumption intensity = Total electric consumption in Kwh / Commercial surface in m2<br>\n<br>\nThe data of the total commercial area in m2 will be obtained from the reports published on the chain's website for the year evaluated. The company may not publish it, but may use an intensity indicator based on its surface (of CO2 emissions per m2, for example), from which the total surface of the chain can be calculated.<br>\nFailing that, we may use the data published by some specialized reference sources such as Alimarket, Inforetail, DataRetail, Statista, Nielsen, Kantar, IRI Infoscan, ...<br>\nThis data must be homogeneous and comparable for the 2 years analyzed, so the source of data on the commercial area must be the same. Thus, if we use Alimarket to find out the total commercial area of ??a chain in a given year, we must use the same source to compare with the previous year.<br>\n<br>\nNOTE: We must exclude from electricity consumption, that from low impact renewable energy (solar, wind, etc ..).<br>\n<br>\nThe tranches have been selected after analyzing the relative consumption of the supermarket sector and the best performances as a reference.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The intensity of electricity consumption calculated or published by the company is less than 100Kwh per m2<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish data on electricity consumption<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Electricity less than 100 Kwh per m2 of commercial surface+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Electricity_less_than_100_Kwh_per_m2_of_commercial_surface+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Electricity_less_than_100_Kwh_per_m2_of_commercial_surface+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827186,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Electricity  less than 350 Kwh per m2 of commercial area",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Electricity_less_than_350_Kwh_per_m2_of_commercial_area.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Electricity  less than 350 Kwh per m2 of commercial area",
      "question": "The company's electricity consumption ratio is less than 350 kWh per m2 of commercial space.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.2 Efficiency and energy saving\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we refer to the 2 most important aspects of sustainable energy consumption: Efficiency and Savings.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy saving involves a change in consumption habits such as avoiding energy waste.<br>\nEnergy efficiency is the fact of minimising the amount of energy needed to satisfy the demand without affecting its quality; it means replacing one piece of equipment with another that, with the same performance, consumes less electricity, for example.",
      "methodology": "Within the energy consumption of supermarket chains, we consider in this question only electricity for the purpose of intensity ratio in order to ensure homogeneity and comparability among all the companies evaluated. In any case, electricity consumption represents around the 80% of total energy consumption in this sector.<br>\n<br>\nIt is very unlikely that companies will publish their intensity of electricity consumption per m2 of surface area, so this ratio will have to be calculated from the electricity consumption published by the company and its total m2 of commercial surface with the formula:<br>\n<br>\nElectricity consumption intensity = Total electric consumption in Kwh / Commercial surface in m2<br>\n<br>\nThe data of the total commercial area in m2 will be obtained from the reports published on the chain's website for the year evaluated. The company may not publish it, but may use an intensity indicator based on its surface (of CO2 emissions per m2, for example), from which the total surface of the chain can be calculated.<br>\nFailing that, we may use the data published by some specialized reference sources such as Alimarket, Inforetail, DataRetail, Statista, Nielsen, Kantar, IRI Infoscan, ...<br>\nThis data must be homogeneous and comparable for the 2 years analyzed, so the source of data on the commercial area must be the same. Thus, if we use Alimarket to find out the total commercial area of ??a chain in a given year, we must use the same source to compare with the previous year.<br>\n<br>\nNOTE: We must exclude from electricity consumption, that from low impact renewable energy (solar, wind, etc ..).<br>\n<br>\nThe tranches have been selected after analyzing the relative consumption of the supermarket sector and the best performances as a reference.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The intensity of electricity consumption calculated or published by the company is less than 350Kwh per m2<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish data on electricity consumption<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Electricity  less than 350 Kwh per m2 of commercial area+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Electricity_less_than_350_Kwh_per_m2_of_commercial_area+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Electricity_less_than_350_Kwh_per_m2_of_commercial_area+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827197,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Electricity less than 750 Kwh per m2 of commercial surface",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Electricity_less_than_750_Kwh_per_m2_of_commercial_surface.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Electricity less than 750 Kwh per m2 of commercial surface",
      "question": "The company's electricity consumption ratio is less than 750 kWh per m2 of commercial space.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.2 Efficiency and energy saving\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we refer to the 2 most important aspects of sustainable energy consumption: Efficiency and Savings.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy saving involves a change in consumption habits such as avoiding energy waste.<br>\nEnergy efficiency is the fact of minimising the amount of energy needed to satisfy the demand without affecting its quality; it means replacing one piece of equipment with another that, with the same performance, consumes less electricity, for example.",
      "methodology": "Within the energy consumption of supermarket chains, we consider in this question only electricity for the purpose of intensity ratio in order to ensure homogeneity and comparability among all the companies evaluated. In any case, electricity consumption represents around the 80% of total energy consumption in this sector.<br>\n<br>\nIt is very unlikely that companies will publish their intensity of electricity consumption per m2 of surface area, so this ratio will have to be calculated from the electricity consumption published by the company and its total m2 of commercial surface with the formula:<br>\n<br>\nElectricity consumption intensity = Total electric consumption in Kwh / Commercial surface in m2<br>\n<br>\nThe data of the total commercial area in m2 will be obtained from the reports published on the chain's website for the year evaluated. The company may not publish it, but may use an intensity indicator based on its surface (of CO2 emissions per m2, for example), from which the total surface of the chain can be calculated.<br>\nFailing that, we may use the data published by some specialized reference sources such as Alimarket, Inforetail, DataRetail, Statista, Nielsen, Kantar, IRI Infoscan, ...<br>\nThis data must be homogeneous and comparable for the 2 years analyzed, so the source of data on the commercial area must be the same. Thus, if we use Alimarket to find out the total commercial area of ??a chain in a given year, we must use the same source to compare with the previous year.<br>\n<br>\nNOTE: We must exclude from electricity consumption, that from low impact renewable energy (solar, wind, etc ..).<br>\n<br>\nThe tranches have been selected after analyzing the relative consumption of the supermarket sector and the best performances as a reference.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The intensity of electricity consumption calculated or published by the company is less than 750Kwh per m2<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish data on electricity consumption<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Electricity less than 750 Kwh per m2 of commercial surface+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Electricity_less_than_750_Kwh_per_m2_of_commercial_surface+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Electricity_less_than_750_Kwh_per_m2_of_commercial_surface+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827208,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Campaigns that promote energy saving",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Campaigns_that_promote_energy_saving.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Campaigns that promote energy saving",
      "question": "The company develops or participates in internal or external campaigns that promote energy saving.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.2 Efficiency and energy saving\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we refer to the 2 most important aspects of sustainable energy consumption: Efficiency and Savings.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy saving involves a change in consumption habits such as avoiding energy waste.<br>\nEnergy efficiency is the fact of minimising the amount of energy needed to satisfy the demand without affecting its quality; it means replacing one piece of equipment with another that, with the same performance, consumes less electricity, for example.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company organizes or participates in energy saving awareness and education initiatives. We value the involvement in at least 2 actions, among which we include below some examples in the sector:<br>\n<br>\n- Awareness campaigns (the company joins Earth Hour)<br>\n- Responsible energy consumption workshops<br>\n- Training and awareness for customers and employees<br>\n- Signage in workspaces to raise awareness of the importance of rationalizing energy consumption<br>\n- Collaboration in public programs for citizen participation (eg \"Activate +\" of the Provincial Council of Bizkaia, based on the international program Global Action Plan)<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Education Initiatives",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Campaigns that promote energy saving+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Campaigns_that_promote_energy_saving+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Campaigns_that_promote_energy_saving+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827219,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy 100% renewable",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_100_renewable.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Energy 100% renewable",
      "question": "100% of the energy used by the company comes from low-impact renewable resources.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.3 Renewable energy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts to source energy from both purchased and self-generated renewable sources.<br>\n<br>\nRenewable energy or 'green energy' generally emits fewer GHG emissions than other energy sources that supply the electricity grid. <br>\n<br>\nExamples are solar photovoltaic panels, solar thermal, geothermal energy, landfill gas, low-impact hydropower and wind turbines. This description can be found on page 98 and chapter 4 of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that 100% of the electricity it consumes comes from renewable sources in all its facilities, whether purchased or self-generated.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy 100% renewable+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_100_renewable+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_100_renewable+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827230,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy 75% renewable",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_75_renewable.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Energy 75% renewable",
      "question": "At least 75% of the energy used by the company comes from low-impact renewable resources.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.3 Renewable energy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts to source energy from both purchased and self-generated renewable sources.<br>\n<br>\nRenewable energy or 'green energy' generally emits fewer GHG emissions than other energy sources that supply the electricity grid. <br>\n<br>\nExamples are solar photovoltaic panels, solar thermal, geothermal energy, landfill gas, low-impact hydropower and wind turbines. This description can be found on page 98 and chapter 4 of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that at least 75% of the electricity it consumes comes from renewable sources in all its facilities.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy 75% renewable+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_75_renewable+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_75_renewable+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827241,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy 50% renewable",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_50_renewable.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Energy 50% renewable",
      "question": "At least 50% of the energy used by the company comes from low-impact renewable resources.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.3 Renewable energy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts to source energy from both purchased and self-generated renewable sources.<br>\n<br>\nRenewable energy or 'green energy' generally emits fewer GHG emissions than other energy sources that supply the electricity grid. <br>\n<br>\nExamples are solar photovoltaic panels, solar thermal, geothermal energy, landfill gas, low-impact hydropower and wind turbines. This description can be found on page 98 and chapter 4 of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that at least 50% of the electricity it consumes comes from renewable sources in all its facilities.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy 50% renewable+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_50_renewable+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_50_renewable+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827252,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy 30% renewable",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_30_renewable.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Energy 30% renewable",
      "question": "At least 30% of the energy used by the company is self-generated from low-impact renewable resources.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.3 Renewable energy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts to source energy from both purchased and self-generated renewable sources.<br>\n<br>\nRenewable energy or 'green energy' generally emits fewer GHG emissions than other energy sources that supply the electricity grid. <br>\n<br>\nExamples are solar photovoltaic panels, solar thermal, geothermal energy, landfill gas, low-impact hydropower and wind turbines. This description can be found on page 98 and chapter 4 of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that at least 30% of the electricity it consumes comes from renewable sources in all its facilities.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy 30% renewable+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_30_renewable+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_30_renewable+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827263,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Use of self-generated renewable energy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Use_of_self_generated_renewable_energy.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Use of self-generated renewable energy",
      "question": "The company uses self-generated renewable energy from low-impact sources.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.3 Renewable energy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts to source energy from both purchased and self-generated renewable sources.<br>\n<br>\nRenewable energy or 'green energy' generally emits fewer GHG emissions than other energy sources that supply the electricity grid. <br>\n<br>\nExamples are solar photovoltaic panels, solar thermal, geothermal energy, landfill gas, low-impact hydropower and wind turbines. This description can be found on page 98 and chapter 4 of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.",
      "methodology": "This question only addresses the (on-site) generation of renewable energy by the company itself.<br>\nHere we do not ask for a specific percentage of energy obtained at the moment, but we consider at least any type of action aimed at obtaining self-produced energy, usually from low-impact sources such as solar panels and to a lesser extent windmills. (when the location and respect for the environment's bio-diversity allow it). These modalities are currently the maximum reference as a \"\" best practice \"\" in the retail sector.<br>\nWe exclude biomass as renewable sources due to its lack of consensus regarding its sustainability and impacts on the climate and forests.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it is self-sufficient with renewable energy generated by itself.<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it is self-sufficient with renewable energy, but it comes from biomass<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Use of self-generated renewable energy+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Use_of_self_generated_renewable_energy+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Use_of_self_generated_renewable_energy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827274,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Goals on renewable energy supply",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Goals_on_renewable_energy_supply.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Goals on renewable energy supply",
      "question": "The company sets concrete targets for renewable energy sourcing by 2025.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.3 Renewable energy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts to source energy from both purchased and self-generated renewable sources.<br>\n<br>\nRenewable energy or 'green energy' generally emits fewer GHG emissions than other energy sources that supply the electricity grid. <br>\n<br>\nExamples are solar photovoltaic panels, solar thermal, geothermal energy, landfill gas, low-impact hydropower and wind turbines. This description can be found on page 98 and chapter 4 of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.",
      "methodology": "Through self-supply or purchased, we assess the quantifiable and temporary objectives in terms of obtaining renewable energy before 2025. We also assign an SI to those companies that have already achieved a goal of 100% renewable energy supply<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares a target for the supply of energy from renewable sources by 2025, either purchased or self-generated. Here we do not ask for any%<br>\n<br>\n- The company is supplied with 100% energy from renewable sources<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Goals on renewable energy supply+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Goals_on_renewable_energy_supply+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Goals_on_renewable_energy_supply+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827285,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of water consumption in m3",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_water_consumption_in_m3.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of water consumption in m3",
      "question": "The company records and publishes its total water consumption in m3.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is based on the \"Content 303-5 Water consumption\" of the standard \"GRI 302: Water and effluents",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes its total water consumption for all areas. The unit of measurement can be megalitres as stipulated in GRI Content 303-5 or m3 which is commonly used in supermarket publications.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of water consumption in m3+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_water_consumption_in_m3+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_water_consumption_in_m3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827296,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the water consumption ratio",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_water_consumption_ratio.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the water consumption ratio",
      "question": "The company registers and publishes a water consumption ratio in (L / m2, M3 / store, etc).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The intensity of water consumption by a company (expressed in liters or cubic meters per m2, store, sales unit or other unit) is a fundamental indicator when evaluating its relative water consumption based on its size and to be able to compare it fairly with that of the rest of its competitors.<br>\n<br>\nThat is why we value with this metric that companies include this indicator in their reports, even with different denominators.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes a water consumption ratio. We will accept any denominator that allows us to evaluate its consumption relative to the size of the company such as m2 of floor space, shop, unit of goods, etc....<br>\nThus, we should find, for example, X litres per m2, X m3 per shop, etc...<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the water consumption ratio+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_water_consumption_ratio+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_water_consumption_ratio+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827307,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the water footprint of the own brand",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_water_footprint_of_the_own_brand.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the water footprint of the own brand",
      "question": "The company measures and publishes the water footprint of some of its own brand products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "According to the Water Footprint Network, a corporate water footprint is defined as the total volume of fresh water that is used directly and indirectly to manage and support a business.<br>\n<br>\nThe water footprint of a company consists of two components:<br>\n<br>\nThe water footprint of the supply chain (indirect) which is the water used in a company's own supply chain. This is the indirect use of water.<br>\nThe operational (direct) water footprint, which is the water used by a company for production or manufacturing purposes, and for support activities. This is the direct use of water.<br>\n<br>\nThis metric is a first step in our demands regarding the registration and publication of a water footprint as complete as possible that reflects the comprehensive impact of the service or products offered by a company throughout the value chain.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes the water footprint of at least one own-brand product (direct and indirect). <br>\n<br>\n- The company sets a target related to the certification of the water footprint of at least one of its products (ISO 14046 or similar).<br>\n<br>\nISO 14046 is currently the reference standard for companies to measure and verify their water footprint.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the water footprint of the own brand+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_water_footprint_of_the_own_brand+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_water_footprint_of_the_own_brand+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827318,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Water consumption reduction by 10%",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_consumption_reduction_by_10.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Water consumption reduction by 10%",
      "question": "The company has reduced its water consumption by at least 10% vs. previous year or base year.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"4.2 Management and reduction of water consumption\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the standard \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" we intend to evaluate the efforts of companies to reduce and sustainably manage their water consumption and take the first steps in order to control the water impact in their chain of supply",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company publicly states in any of its reports that it has reduced its total water consumption by at least 10% compared to the previous year or base year, or publishes its consumption data for the previous year in order to calculate and verify this reduction.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish its water consumption and does not mention that it has reduced its water consumption. Or:<br>\n- The company publishes its water consumption for the last 2 years and this has been reduced by less than 10%.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Water consumption reduction by 10%+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_consumption_reduction_by_10+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_consumption_reduction_by_10+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827329,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of the water consumption rate by 5%",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_the_water_consumption_rate_by_5.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of the water consumption rate by 5%",
      "question": "The company has reduced its water consumption ratio by at least 5% vs. the previous year or base year.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The intensity or ratio of water consumption by a company (expressed in liters or cubic meters per m2, store, sales unit or other unit) is a fundamental indicator when evaluating its relative water consumption based on its size and to be able to compare it fairly with that of the rest of its competitors.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\nThe company declares to have reduced its water consumption ratio by at least 5% compared to the previous year or the base year. <br>\nThis ratio can be expressed in m3 per m2 of commercial area, per shop, per product unit or any other denominator that allows to assess the intensity of its consumption regardless of its growth and expansion. <br>\n<br>\nIf there are no declarations in this respect, the possible reduction will be calculated on the basis of the data of the last 2 years (if included in the last report of the company).<br>\n<br>\nThe ratio will have to be calculated from the company's published water consumption and its total m2 of commercial space with the formula :<br>\n<br>\nIntensity of water consumption = Total water consumption in L or m3 / Commercial surface in m2<br>\n<br>\nThe total commercial area in m2 shall be obtained from the reports published on the chain's website for the year under assessment. The company may not publish it, but may use an intensity indicator based on its surface area (e.g. CO2 emissions per m2 ), from which the total surface area of the chain can be calculated.<br>\nFailing that, we can resort to the data published by some specialised reference sources such as Alimarket, Inforetail, DataRetail, Statista, Nielsen, Kantar, IRI Infoscan, ... <br>\nThis data must be homogeneous and comparable for the 2 years analysed, so the source of data on retail space must be the same. Thus, if we use Alimarket to know the total retail area of a chain in a given year, we must use the same source to compare it with the previous year.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of the water consumption rate by 5%+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_the_water_consumption_rate_by_5+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_the_water_consumption_rate_by_5+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827340,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Objectives to reduce water consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Objectives_to_reduce_water_consumption.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Objectives to reduce water consumption",
      "question": "The company has established quantifiable goals for reducing water consumption in direct operations.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"4.2 Management and reduction of water consumption\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the standard \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" we intend to evaluate the efforts of companies to reduce and sustainably manage their water consumption and take the first steps in order to control the water impact in their chain of supply",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to set concrete quantitative and temporal targets for the reduction of its water consumption. This should include the % to be reduced and the timeframe. We do not require a minimum target here.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Objectives to reduce water consumption+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Objectives_to_reduce_water_consumption+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Objectives_to_reduce_water_consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827351,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Water consumption requirements for the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_consumption_requirements_for_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Water consumption requirements for the supply chain",
      "question": "The company establishes some kind of requirement of responsibility and commitment to the management and protection of water in its supply chain.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is especially relevant for those establishments with textile departments due to the impact of this industry on water resources, but also the agricultural and livestock sectors, common to all evaluated supermarkets, due to their link to the production of their own brands.<br>\n<br>\n Among all the 8 supermarkets evaluated so far, the best practices in this regard can be found in Aldi Germany (See Aldi Germany Water Protection Policy).",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company publishes some kind of code of conduct that requires its main textile and/or agricultural suppliers to comply with water saving and water protection standards.<br>\nIn the case of multinational companies, this policy must be applied in Spain or in at least 2 of its international subsidiaries. <br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares some kind of requirements to its suppliers, but these are not concrete, nor do they go beyond what is required by the legislation itself:<br>\nSome examples of statements in the sector are :<br>\n<br>\n- All our suppliers have to work in accordance with the Guidelines of Conduct\".<br>\n- We have included environmental and social clauses in our cleaning specifications and demand that service providers take measures to limit water consumption. <br>\n-Our supplier audits allow us to verify the compliance of factories in terms of water consumption and waste water and effluent treatment.<br>\n- We demand compliance with the regulations on water discharges,...\".<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Water consumption requirements for the supply chain+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_consumption_requirements_for_the_supply_chain+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_consumption_requirements_for_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827362,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Water saving measures in own facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_saving_measures_in_own_facilities.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Water saving measures in own facilities",
      "question": "The company develops methods for saving and reducing water consumption in its own facilities.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"4.2 Management and reduction of water consumption\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the standard \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" we intend to evaluate the efforts of companies to reduce and sustainably manage their water consumption and take the first steps in order to control the water impact in their chain of supply",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares concrete measures (at least 3) aimed at saving water consumption such as:<br>\n<br>\n- Water saving taps, toilets, urinals or showers/shower heads - - - - Use of grey water for irrigation Low volume irrigation. <br>\n- Rainwater harvesting <br>\n- Automated faucets <br>\n- Water monitoring and leakage prevention systems<br>\n- Irrigation water recovery system. <br>\n- Implementation of osmosis processes for water use.<br>\n- Water consumption rationalisation plan of general application.<br>\n- Use of self-cleaning ovens (pre-baking) that can be cleaned without water. <br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Water saving measures in own facilities+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_saving_measures_in_own_facilities+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_saving_measures_in_own_facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827373,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Water saving measures in the production chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_saving_measures_in_the_production_chain.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Water saving measures in the production chain",
      "question": "The company develops methods for saving and reducing water consumption in its production chain.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Many of the private label products may be subject to water-related risks in the countries of manufacture and production. This applies in particular to agricultural products, whose production accounts for about 70% of global water use and to finishing processes for textiles and footwear.<br>\nHere we value the initiatives around food, perfumery and hygiene products (common to all the supers evaluated), although we will also take into account the actions in the textile field for those supermarkets that work with this line of products.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to develop water saving methods in the manufacturing of any of its own branded product lines.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Water saving measures in the production chain+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_saving_measures_in_the_production_chain+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_saving_measures_in_the_production_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827384,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Actions to promote the protection and saving of water",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Actions_to_promote_the_protection_and_saving_of_water.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Actions to promote the protection and saving of water",
      "question": "The company develops internal or external initiatives that promote water saving and protection.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"4.2 Management and reduction of water consumption\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the standard \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" we intend to evaluate the efforts of companies to reduce and sustainably manage their water consumption and take the first steps in order to control the water impact in their chain of supply",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company organises or participates in internal and external water saving awareness and education initiatives. We value involvement in at least one action, of which the following are some examples in the sector:<br>\n<br>\n- Awareness campaigns (e.g. \"Save water, it's the centre of life\" campaign).<br>\n- Workshops on responsible water consumption<br>\n- Training and awareness-raising for customers and employees<br>\n- Posters in workplaces to raise awareness of the importance of rationalising water consumption. <br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Actions to promote the protection and saving of water+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Actions_to_promote_the_protection_and_saving_of_water+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Actions_to_promote_the_protection_and_saving_of_water+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827395,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Solid microplastics removal",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Solid_microplastics_removal.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Solid microplastics removal",
      "question": "The company establishes concrete measures to remove solid microplastics from its private label products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Microplastics are small pieces of plastic in the form of tiny microscopic particles that pollute the environment and in particular the water of our aceans. Although it is still debated from what size they can be considered microplastics, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) uses the parameter of less than 5mm in diameter to classify them.These come from a wide variety of sources, including cosmetics, plastic paints, clothing, fishing items, everyday plastic waste, and industrial processes.<br>\n<br>\nDue to the fact that it does not biodegrade and only disintegrates into smaller parts, these microplastics end up being absorbed or ingested by many organisms, staying in their bodies, tissues4 and after their death due to poisoning, as they cannot differentiate between their food. marine, increasing the problem, among seabirds, fish, sharks, aquatic mammals, such as a beached whale that died from ingesting plastic. The complete cycle and movement of microplastics in the environment is not yet fully known, but it is a topic that is currently being investigated.5 The possible consequences of these microplastics that end up housed in the human body, which have been found in some foods from the sea, such as salt, bottled water and tap water.<br>\n<br>\nA large part of the products susceptible to incorporating these agents in their manufacture can be found in our supermarket basket, so we demand with this metric that the reduction of these microplastics be part of the environmental strategies of large distribution within its Policy for water protection",
      "methodology": "This metric refers to the proportion of solid microplastics (microbeads) mainly in personal care and cosmetic products, detergents, cleaning products and textiles. <br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to have eliminated microplastics in the manufacture of at least one own-brand product line within the textile, cosmetics, hygiene, perfumery or any other category likely to incorporate them.<br>\n   This action must be carried out in Spain or in at least 2 foreign delegations in the case of multi-national companies.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- Relevant sources are omitted within each type of emissions, such as: - The information can be found in any of the following sources.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Solid microplastics removal+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 22,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Solid_microplastics_removal+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Solid_microplastics_removal+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827406,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Recycling of water in the production chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recycling_of_water_in_the_production_chain.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Recycling of water in the production chain",
      "question": "The company implements water recycling methods in its production chain",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Of the total world consumption, only 11% is destined for domestic use, 19% is used in the textile industry, especially in the generation of energy, and around 70% is used by agriculture.<br>\n<br>\nWith this metric we want to check the reuse of industrial and agricultural wastewater by large distributors in terms of the production of their own brand, which we believe is a responsibility and a necessity to combat water stress.<br>\n<br>\nIn this sense, the recycling of wastewater has a determining role. Through the application of different purification and treatment processes, it is possible to ensure that used water is not wasted, reducing the risk of environmental contamination and allowing companies to benefit from benefits such as reducing costs or increasing operating efficiency.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares the implementation of recycling or reuse systems for water used in its own brand production chain (recycling of waste water in textile, agricultural or manufacturing processes).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)\".<br>\n\"We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to develop systems to recycle, reuse or recover water in its own commercial, administrative and logistic facilities (grey water from washing processes, toilets, showers, rainwater recovery, etc.).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Recycling of water in the production chain+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recycling_of_water_in_the_production_chain+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recycling_of_water_in_the_production_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827417,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Water recycling in own facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_recycling_in_own_facilities.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Water recycling in own facilities",
      "question": "The company implements water recycling or recovery methods in its own facilities.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Although due to the type of activity of supermarkets, the consumption of water in their stores, logistics platforms or offices is not significant, especially in comparison to industrial and agricultural consumption in their supply chain, we still want to evaluate with this question whether These companies apply gray water recycling methods as a result of a corporate and responsible policy regarding the use of this increasingly important and threatened natural resource.<br>\n<br>\nIn this sense, what we value with this metric are the initiatives in the matter of water recovery, such as retention of rainwater for irrigation as we have verified that Mercadona and Lidl carry out or the promotion of green buildings in Aldi Germany that reduce the demand for drinking water by recycling wastewater and using local resources<br>\n<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nAlthough the water consumption of supermarkets in their facilities is much less relevant, we do want to evaluate also with this question if they apply gray water recycling methods as a result of a corporate and responsible policy regarding the use of water<br>\n<br>\nIn this sense, the recycling of wastewater plays a determining role. Through the application of different purification and treatment processes, it is possible to ensure that used water is not wasted, reducing the risk of environmental contamination and allowing companies to opt for benefits such as reducing costs or increasing operating efficiency.",
      "methodology": "With this metric we aim to assess the commitment and performance of companies in favour of Biodiversity and the correct disclosure of their data and actions in the field of :<br>\n <br>\n - Recognition of the impact of their activities and measures for the protection of biodiversity<br>\n - Sustainable fisheries<br>\n - Offering of organic and sustainable products<br>\n - Sustainable wood and paper<br>\n - Monocultures (palm oil, soya, cotton)<br>\n - Genetic modification<br>\n - Conflict crops (Cocoa, coffee and tea)<br>\n <br>\n Wikirate vs. Eticonsum scoring system:<br>\n <br>\n Eticonsum's scoring system is out of 100 points, where 0 is the lowest score and 100 the highest, while Wikirate's standardised system is out of 10. Thus, a score of 75/100 on Eticonsum's platform would be equivalent to 7.5/10 on Wikirate.org",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Water recycling in own facilities+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_recycling_in_own_facilities+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_recycling_in_own_facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827428,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Declarations on impacts on biodiversity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Declarations_on_impacts_on_biodiversity.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Declarations on impacts on biodiversity",
      "question": "The company addresses the issue of biodiversity in some way in its public reports.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric supposes a minimum requirement for companies in matters of Biodiversity. The basic thing we can expect from them is that they at least dedicate space in their public documents to provide some type of information on the recognition of the impact of their activity on Biodiversity above all for the responsibility that corresponds to them with respect to their supply chain.<br>\n<br>\nHere we are very few demanding and we do not consider concrete or quantifiable results, which may give rise to some subjective appreciation by the evaluator, but what we intend with this question is to at least penalize more those companies that do not make any kind of mention of this matter and they do not even include aspects related to Biodiversity as a relevant or material topic in their reports.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company makes a statement in its reporting that demonstrates its recognition of the impact of its activity (agricultural and livestock production in its own-brand supply chain) and the importance of protecting biodiversity and ecosystems.<br>\nThis statement must be reinforced with a relevant project, practice or policy on biodiversity protection.<br>\n<br>\nRelevant projects, practices or policies in the sector may include :<br>\n<br>\n- Raw materials policy, responsible sourcing (in relation to sustainable fresh produce, palm oil or monocultures in general, controversial crops such as cocoa, coffee and tea, genetic modification, wood and paper, flowers and plants, sustainable fish, etc.).<br>\n- Collaboration with organisations such as WWF (World Wildlife Fund for Nature) on biodiversity issues.<br>\n- Fair Trade policy<br>\n- Specific strategy for the supply of organic products<br>\n- <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Declarations on impacts on biodiversity+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Declarations_on_impacts_on_biodiversity+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Declarations_on_impacts_on_biodiversity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827439,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Compliance and impact assessment of the new facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Compliance_and_impact_assessment_of_the_new_facilities.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Compliance and impact assessment of the new facilities",
      "question": "The company declares to comply with the legislation and evaluate the impact of its new facilities on Biodiversity.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "We value with this metric that the company declares to carry out a technical study on biodiversity and respect for the fauna and flora of the land where a new supermarket will be or has been established, as well as with the aim of reducing the environmental impacts of construction works and, in particular, their impacts on water and biodiversity. In this way, it is guaranteed that the environmental impact of the implantation of a new supermarket in a certain area is not detrimental to it and allows a sustainable development of the environment.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to pre-assess the land and environment of the site of its new facilities in order to reduce its impact on biodiversity. This can be done through a technical study or a certification (e.g. \"Breean New Building\", \"Breean in Use\" environmental certification). <br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Compliance and impact assessment of the new facilities+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Compliance_and_impact_assessment_of_the_new_facilities+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Compliance_and_impact_assessment_of_the_new_facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827450,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Impacts on biodiversity in the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Impacts_on_biodiversity_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Impacts on biodiversity in the supply chain",
      "question": "The company recognizes and reports on the impacts of its supply chain on Biodiversity.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is based on the\" \"Content 304-2 Significant impacts of activities, products and services on biodiversity\" \"of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)<br>\n<br>\nWe know that the major buyers of palm oil, soybean and other resources from over-exploited and devastated tropical regions such as the Amazon and Southeast Asia are the main European manufacturers and distributors for the production of their processed products and animal feed.<br>\n<br>\nThe least that we could expect as consumers of their products is that companies know the practices of their raw material suppliers, report on their possible impacts on ecosystems and establish a minimum of measures to remedy them.<br>\nWith this metric, we do not require companies to specify their direct link, for example, with soy suppliers related to deforestation and illegal burning of forests in the Amazon (that if such link does not exist and is communicated, it would be an achievement and differentiating element within the sector, worthy of note in style.). What we ask is that they at least address and explain in their reports the most pressing problems associated with Biodiversity within their value chain, among which we highlight:<br>\n<br>\n- The degradation, deforestation and conversion of natural ecosystems, especially in tropical regions, due to the expansion and industrial production of soybeans, intensive livestock, the timber industry and the overexploitation of other resources such as minerals, especially in the Amazon.<br>\n<br>\n- Deforestation caused by the cultivation of palm oil especially in Indonesia and Malaysia.<br>\n<br>\n- Agricultural expansion, both for livestock and animal feed, is a major driver of deforestation and is also responsible for approximately 60% of direct global greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture<br>\n<br>\n- The loss of marine biodiversity due to overfishing and destructive harvesting systems",
      "methodology": "What we expect with this metric is that companies recognise and explain the impacts on Biodiversity associated with their activity within their long supply chains and in particular their sourcing of raw materials such as soy, palm oil, meat, paper and wood, fisheries, aquaculture, pesticide use and the impact of their activity on agriculture. <br>\n We scored YES if the company describes at least one of the above impacts.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Impacts on biodiversity in the supply chain+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Impacts_on_biodiversity_in_the_supply_chain+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Impacts_on_biodiversity_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827461,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Promotion of the reduction of meat consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_the_reduction_of_meat_consumption.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Promotion of the reduction of meat consumption",
      "question": "The company promotes the reduction of the consumption of meat and dairy products from intensive livestock farming.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "With this metric we intend to encourage food distributors to encourage a moderation in the consumption of meat and dairy products as the main measure to curb the impacts of livestock and intensive soy.<br>\nSolving the deforestation of tropical forests due to the cultivation of soybeans does not mean transferring its production to less devastated and safer regions, according to Greenpeace in its report \"\" Hooked on the meat \"\" would need another 110,000 km2 (an area the size of Austria and Belgium together110) to grow all the soy currently imported by the EU.<br>\n<br>\nThe most sustainable solution in this regard is to get the EU to reduce its consumption of meat and dairy. This must be achieved through political instruments, including a radical reform of the CAP to prevent factory farms and meat producers from being subsidized and to redirect subsidies towards a diet model based on plant-based products and organic livestock.<br>\nIn this, supermarkets have an essential role as the main buyers and distributors",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to establish or develop some kind of measure or initiative to promote moderation of meat and dairy consumption among its consumers.<br>\nSo far, after 8 companies assessed in the supermarket sector we have not found any such initiative that we can include here as an example of good practice.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Promotion of the reduction of meat consumption+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_the_reduction_of_meat_consumption+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_the_reduction_of_meat_consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827472,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Biodiversity protection measures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Biodiversity_protection_measures.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Biodiversity protection measures",
      "question": "The company develops multiple relevant and specific actions to protect Biodiversity.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.1 Protection of biodiversity and management of the impacts of the activity\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"\" GRI 304: Biodiversity \"\" standard, we intend to evaluate how companies recognize and manage the impacts of their activity on biodiversity and establish measures to minimize and preserve them",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it has carried out concrete and relevant measures to protect biodiversity. We value any action related to projects, campaigns or initiatives, both our own and those of third parties.<br>\n<br>\nWe summarize some good practices carried out by the supermarkets evaluated so far:<br>\n<br>\n- Construction of landscaped roofs with nest boxes, drinkers and feeders for birds and hotels for insects, etc ...<br>\n- Initiatives for the recovery of natural spaces<br>\n- Participation in tree reforestation programs<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy of raw materials with less impact on biodiversity<br>\n - Programs to promote environmental sustainability aimed at schoolchildren<br>\n- Maintenance of the garden areas with sustainable methods (without pesticides and manual methods)<br>\n- Creation of �biodiversity� reserves<br>\n- Forest restoration projects<br>\n- Promotion and Marketing of traditional horticultural varieties �. - Recover FROM traditional seeds<br>\n -Organization of cleaning operations of natural spaces<br>\n- Actions for the protection of bees (prohibition of chemicals in harmful fruit and vegetables, BEE FRIENDLY label, which guarantees good agricultural practices in relation to pollinating insects.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Biodiversity protection measures+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Biodiversity_protection_measures+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Biodiversity_protection_measures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827483,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Fish labeling compliance",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Fish_labeling_compliance.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Fish labeling compliance",
      "question": "The company strictly complies with the EU labeling regulations for fresh and frozen fish (own brand).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": "The European regulation indicates that the establishments must show the commercial denomination and the scientific name of the species; if the specimen has been caught in the sea or in fresh water or if it is breeding; the waters where it was fished or the country where their rearing period has concluded, the fishing gear used or if the product has been previously thawed, they must also reflect the final price.<br>\n<br>\nIn order to offer the maximum transparency of their own brand fish products, distributors must clearly have the following information on their labeling and packaging:<br>\n<br>\n- Wild fishing: Designation / origin, geographical area of ??capture, sub-geographical area (if available) and methods of capture.<br>\n- Aquaculture: Spanish denomination, South American denomination and country of origin.<br>\n <br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to comply strictly with the Labeling Law or there is no evidence that it does not comply with it through audits in stores or documented complaints via social networks. We invite all our collaborating researchers to update this metric for the companies evaluated by providing photographic evidence in case of non-compliance.<br>\n<br>\nSo far, with 8 companies evaluated, we assign a YES to all supermarkets presuming compliance with the Law, but we leave this score alive pending any eventual non-compliance detected<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- Through audits in stores or complaints documented via RRSS, at least one own-brand frozen product or 2 fresh fish counters from the evaluated company does not correctly comply with the labeling in the terms indicated above.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Fish labeling compliance+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Fish_labeling_compliance+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Fish_labeling_compliance+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827494,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Promotion of sustainable fishing products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_sustainable_fishing_products.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Promotion of sustainable fishing products",
      "question": "The company promotes the information and purchase of sustainable fish products among consumers.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to establish concrete actions in order to promote the purchase of sustainable and equitable fishery products among consumers.<br>\nSome examples of good practices developed by the sector in this regard are:<br>\n<br>\n- Promotion of the consumption of sustainable fish products through advertising brochures,<br>\n- Participation in campaigns to promote sustainable fishing (\"\" #MaresPara Siempre \"\" promoted by the non-profit association MSC - - Communication and education programs on sustainable fishing.<br>\n- Actions at the point of sale and through consumer information channels (Consumer Magazine)<br>\n- Participation in the Responsible Fishing Week, organized by the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) and the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Promotion of sustainable fishing products+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_sustainable_fishing_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_sustainable_fishing_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827505,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable fishing purchasing policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_fishing_purchasing_policy.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Sustainable fishing purchasing policy",
      "question": "The company publishes a comprehensive, updated and transparent Policy for the Sustainable Purchase of Fish and Seafood based on specific actions and objectives.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": "What do we understand by a Sustainable Fishing Policy?<br>\n<br>\nThe company must document and publish in an accessible, clear and exhaustive way a specific and comprehensive policy regarding the purchase of fishery products with which it demonstrates its commitment to the sustainability of the species and the marine environment, the legislation and the correct traceability of everything the process (from its capture, transport and distribution to making it available to consumers), the capture or breeding, the origin of the raw material, to the correct labeling and information to the consumer.<br>\nIt must be based on specific actions and initiatives and be reviewed every year based on the evolution of the company's performance and the new challenges and risks of the sector in terms of sustainability.<br>\n<br>\nFinally, the company must make this sustainable purchasing policy public and make it easily accessible to any interested party through an individual document or clearly differentiated in any of its non-financial reports.<br>\n <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable fishing purchasing policy+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_fishing_purchasing_policy+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_fishing_purchasing_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827516,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Illegal fishing ban",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Illegal_fishing_ban.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Illegal fishing ban",
      "question": "The company declares that it prohibits any provision of Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (or farming) (IUU).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing accounts for more than 50% of the total catch in almost all fisheries, depleting fish stocks, destroying marine habitats and harming fishermen who carry out their activity in a legal and responsible manner (Eticonsum, \"Illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing\"), <br>\n<br>\nThis practice also causes potential damage to public health by allowing the marketing of seafood or fish that is not sanitary controlled and could be contaminated. <br>\nAccording to the report \"Te lo vas a comer\" of La Sexta broadcast in June 2019, the so-called \"Japanese clam\" illegally fished in Portugal and sent to treatment plants throughout Spain (mainly Galicia), from where its commercialisation is laundered, reaches the markets and supermarkets as legal clams, even of Galician origin in some cases... <br>\n<br>\nTropical tuna fishing is one of the most punished by the interference of illegal fleets around the world. Currently, according to the FAO, illegal fishing is a global business of between 9 and 23 billion dollars.<br>\nConsumers have the right to know what is on their plates, where it comes from, how it is caught, what species it is and also to be certain that the fish they buy is legal.<br>\nMost of the tuna on supermarket shelves comes from foreign fleets - the ones most suspected of illegal fishing. In Spain, 70% of fresh, frozen and canned fish is bought in supermarkets, so they have a key role to play in helping to increase and improve the sustainability of the fishing sector and its product offer",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to guarantee in its reports that its own brand fishery products do not come from \"\" Illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing \"\".<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company certifies with sustainable labels at least 50% of its own brand fish offer<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Illegal fishing ban+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Illegal_fishing_ban+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Illegal_fishing_ban+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827527,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+No commercialization of conflictive species",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+No_commercialization_of_conflictive_species.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "No commercialization of conflictive species",
      "question": "The company declares that it does not commercialize any conflictive species (small, threatened, endangered, overexploited or captured with more harmful methods).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "To curb the threat posed by overfishing and destructive fishing practices on the marine environment, Greenpeace has compiled a list of 22 of the marine species that, for different reasons, should not be sold.<br>\nSome of the species that make up the list are among the most consumed, such as cod or tuna. The communities of these fish have decreased by 90% due to overfishing.<br>\nOther species on the list are monkfish, hake, sole and flounder, which are often fished with trawl nets. This method damages the seabed and is very inaccurate. Up to 70% of the catch can be of other species that die before being returned to the sea.<br>\n<br>\nAlso on the list are salmon and prawns, which are raised on fish farms. In this case, the pressure is on other smaller fish that are used to feed them.<br>\n<br>\nThe Maritime Cluster, the institution that integrates all sectors related to the sea in Spain, coincides in many of the species on the red list and adds others such as shark, marlin or eel, also in danger.<br>\nhttps://www.clustermaritimo.es/2016/06/09/las-diez-especies-de-peces-mas-amenazados-por-la-pesca/",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it has eliminated from its assortment of fresh and frozen fish all species in danger of extinction according to the Greenpeace and / or Maritime Cluster red list and at least until the conditions that make the return possible have been re-established. to his capture.<br>\n<br>\nExamples of other international lists of protected species are:<br>\n<br>\n- The IUCN Red List (International Union for the<br>\nConservation of Nature)<br>\n- CITES (Convention on International Trade in Species<br>\nThreatened Wild Fauna and Flora)<br>\n- The OSPAR Convention on Endangered Species and Habitats<br>\n- China Red List<br>\n- The US Endangered Species Act<br>\n- The Canadian Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife<br>\n- The New Threat Classification System<br>\nZeeland.<br>\nWe will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question also if:<br>\n- The company certifies with sustainable labels at least 50% of its own brand fish offer<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+No commercialization of conflictive species+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+No_commercialization_of_conflictive_species+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+No_commercialization_of_conflictive_species+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827538,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Principles of sustainable aquaculture",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Principles_of_sustainable_aquaculture.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Principles of sustainable aquaculture",
      "question": "The company adopts the main requirements of sustainable aquaculture.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company openly declares to respect the principles of sustainable aquaculture and lists in its reports its main requirements to its aquaculture suppliers.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company certifies fish from this type of farming in all or most of its fish shops (e.g. GLOBALG.A.P GGN, Bio, Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) certificates).<br>\n<br>\nThe main requirements for sustainable aquaculture include :<br>\n<br>\n- Choice of sustainable sites for aquaculture, with special consideration for the surrounding ecosystems, and reduction of negative impact on the surrounding flora and fauna.<br>\n- Breeding and stocking according to the species.<br>\n- No wild fishing for animal feed.<br>\n- No genetically modified offspring and no use of food from plants that have been genetically modified or whose cultivation involves the destruction of the forest.<br>\n- Priority use by the supplier of waste generated by the fishing process, as well as plant components, for animal feed.<br>\n- Strict ecological standards for further processing.<br>\n- Full traceability throughout the entire production chain.<br>\n- No use of chemicals or preventive antibiotics. In case of use for diseases or pest infestations, producers are encouraged to use medicines and chemicals of the prescribed type and kind.<br>\nNo use of growth promoters and hormones.<br>\n- Avoidance of excessive breeding of fish.<br>\n- Prohibition of restocking with wild-caught eggs or young animals.<br>\n- No use of farming practices that have a negative impact on the surrounding flora and fauna, i.e. mangrove forests and native wildlife, as well as the habitat of other species.<br>\n- Gradual conversion of all fish and seafood to aquaculture from certified sources (e.g. GLOBALG.A.P., Bio, Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) certified).<br>\n- Properly functioning faecal water, waste and water management system.<br>\n- Compliance with minimum social standards throughout the production chain, with the support of our suppliers (labour standards according to the International Labour Organisation ILO/BSCI Code), i.e. from the fishing boats through processing to sales.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Principles of sustainable aquaculture+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Principles_of_sustainable_aquaculture+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Principles_of_sustainable_aquaculture+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827549,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+80% of certified fresh fish",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_certified_fresh_fish.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "80% of certified fresh fish",
      "question": "At least 80% of the company's own brand fresh and frozen fish product is certified sustainable or is set as a target within 3 years.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In Spain the market share of certified sustainable fish is around 2%. The consumer's work in their individual purchase decisions is essential, but even more so is that of the distributors with their purchasing policies ...<br>\n According to the latest survey carried out by MSC together with the Global Scan consultancy, 54% have changed their habits for a more responsible one with regard to the purchase of fish (reduction, change of species, certification, etc.)<br>\nOur recommendation is to prefer certified fish, Atlantic species, diversify, seasonal, local (although it does not guarantee that it is sustainable)",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares a proportion of certified sustainable fish products in proportion to the total number of fish products is 80% or more, both fresh and frozen. You must clearly indicate what type of certifcations you offer.<br>\nIn the case of frozen fish, we consider only the own brand.<br>\nAmong the main certifications and reference standards in sustainable fishing are:<br>\n<br>\n Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC), Naturland, Bioland, BAP Best Aquaculture Practice, social and environmental sustainability label �Friends of the Sea�, principles of the ISSF (International Seafood Sustainability Foundation), Fishing Tuna Responsible APR of Aenor Confort, ISO 195006 Sustainable fishing,, Dolphin Safe, Fad-free, GLOBALG.AP and organic farming of the<br>\nEU.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish its proportion of certified sustainable fish or it is less than 80%<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+80% of certified fresh fish+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_certified_fresh_fish+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_certified_fresh_fish+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827560,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+50% of certified fresh fish",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_of_certified_fresh_fish.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "50% of certified fresh fish",
      "question": "At least 50% of the company's own brand fresh and frozen fish product is certified sustainable or set as a target within 3 years.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares a proportion of certified sustainable fish products in proportion to the total number of fish products is 50% or more, both fresh and frozen. You must clearly indicate what type of certifcations you offer.<br>\nIn the case of frozen fish, we consider only the own brand.<br>\nAmong the main certifications and reference standards in sustainable fishing are:<br>\n<br>\n Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC), Naturland, Bioland, BAP Best Aquaculture Practice, social and environmental sustainability label �Friends of the Sea�, principles of the ISSF (International Seafood Sustainability Foundation), Fishing Tuna Responsible APR of Aenor Confort, ISO 195006 Sustainable fishing,, Dolphin Safe, Fad-free, GLOBALG.AP and organic farming of the<br>\nEU.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not publish its proportion of certified sustainable fish or it is less than 50%<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+50% of certified fresh fish+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_of_certified_fresh_fish+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_of_certified_fresh_fish+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827571,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Offer of certified fresh fish",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Offer_of_certified_fresh_fish.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Offer of certified fresh fish",
      "question": "The company declares that it sells fresh and/or frozen fish products of its own brand with sustainable certification.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it has certified sustainable fishery products, both fresh or frozen under its own brand. It does not inform about its proportion with respect to the total of fishing products, but it must clearly indicate what type of certifcations it offers.<br>\n<br>\nIf the company does not publish this information in its reports, check its assortment in its online store, in a physical store, on the Openfoodfact platform (https://es.openfoodfacts.org/) or simply by calling Customer Service.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nAmong the main certifications and reference standards in sustainable fishing are:<br>\n<br>\n Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC), Naturland, Bioland, BAP Best Aquaculture Practice, social and environmental sustainability label �Friends of the Sea�, principles of the ISSF (International Seafood Sustainability Foundation), Fishing Tuna Responsible APR of Aenor Confort, ISO 195006 Sustainable fishing,, Dolphin Safe, Fad-free, GLOBALG.AP and organic farming of the<br>\nEU.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not make any statements in this regard or does not indicate the type of certification of its products.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in the online stores of supermarkets, visiting their physical stores, on the website https://es.openfoodfacts.org/ or in any of the following reports published on the companies website:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Offer of certified fresh fish+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Offer_of_certified_fresh_fish+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Offer_of_certified_fresh_fish+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827582,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+80% of certified canned fish",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_certified_canned_fish.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "80% of certified canned fish",
      "question": "At least 80% of own brand canned fish is certified sustainable or sets it as a target within 3 years.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares a proportion of canned fish with sustainable certification of 80% or more, with respect to the total of canned fish. You must clearly indicate what type of certifcations you offer.<br>\n<br>\nAmong the main certifications and reference standards in sustainable fishing are:<br>\n<br>\n Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC), Naturland, Bioland, BAP Best Aquaculture Practice, social and environmental sustainability label �Friends of the Sea�, principles of the ISSF (International Seafood Sustainability Foundation), Fishing Tuna Responsible APR of Aenor Confort, ISO 195006 Sustainable fishing,, Dolphin Safe, Fad-free, GLOBALG.AP and organic farming of the<br>\nEU.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+80% of certified canned fish+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_certified_canned_fish+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_certified_canned_fish+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827593,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+50% of certified canned fish",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_of_certified_canned_fish.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "50% of certified canned fish",
      "question": "At least 50% of own brand canned fish is certified sustainable or sets it as a target within 3 years.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares a proportion of canned fish with sustainable certification of 50% or more, with respect to the total of canned fish. You must clearly indicate what type of certifcations you offer.<br>\n<br>\nAmong the main certifications and reference standards in sustainable fishing are:<br>\n<br>\n Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC), Naturland, Bioland, BAP Best Aquaculture Practice, social and environmental sustainability label �Friends of the Sea�, principles of the ISSF (International Seafood Sustainability Foundation), Fishing Tuna Responsible APR of Aenor Confort, ISO 195006 Sustainable fishing,, Dolphin Safe, Fad-free, GLOBALG.AP and organic farming of the<br>\nEU.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+50% of certified canned fish+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_of_certified_canned_fish+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_of_certified_canned_fish+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827604,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Offer of certified canned fish",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Offer_of_certified_canned_fish.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Offer of certified canned fish",
      "question": "The company sells canned fish of its own certified brand or of sustainable origin.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it has canned fish with sustainable certification. It does not report its proportion with respect to the total canned fish, but it must clearly indicate what type of certifcations it offers.<br>\n<br>\nIf the company does not publish this information in its reports, check its assortment in its online store, in a physical store, on the Openfoodfact platform (https://es.openfoodfacts.org/) or simply by calling Customer Service.<br>\n<br>\nAmong the main certifications and reference standards in sustainable fishing are:<br>\n<br>\n Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC), Naturland, Bioland, BAP Best Aquaculture Practice, social and environmental sustainability label �Friends of the Sea�, principles of the ISSF (International Seafood Sustainability Foundation), Fishing Tuna Responsible APR of Aenor Confort, ISO 195006 Sustainable fishing,, Dolphin Safe, Fad-free, GLOBALG.AP and organic farming of the<br>\nEU.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company does not make any statements in this regard or does not indicate the type of certification of its products.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in the online stores of supermarkets, visiting their physical stores, on the website https://es.openfoodfacts.org/ or in any of the following reports published on the companies website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Offer of certified canned fish+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Offer_of_certified_canned_fish+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Offer_of_certified_canned_fish+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827615,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable fishing policy required of suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_fishing_policy_required_of_suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Sustainable fishing policy required of suppliers",
      "question": "The company declares that it requires a sustainable fishing policy from all its suppliers of fish products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company openly declares that it requires a Code of Conduct or written commitments from its suppliers that contemplate responsible fishing practices focused on a more sustainable fish catch and production.<br>\nWe value any type of governance system, with efficient control and audit measures that guarantee the practice of a Sustainable Fishing Policy among its suppliers.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- Relevant sources are omitted within each type of emissions, such as<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable fishing policy required of suppliers+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_fishing_policy_required_of_suppliers+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_fishing_policy_required_of_suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827626,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Pesticide residue rate lower than legal",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Pesticide_residue_rate_lower_than_legal.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Pesticide residue rate lower than legal",
      "question": "The company sets lower pesticide residue rate limits than those legally allowed on its \"non-organic\" fruit and vegetables or sets specific targets to reduce their use.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "On the one hand, agrochemicals can be beneficial for crops and producers, as they help their growth and development. However, beyond the damage to the health of people who consume fruits or vegetables that have been in contact With these substances, the absence of pesticide residues benefits the environment in terms of reducing phytosanitary treatments. In this sense, we highlight Auchan's goal in 2019 of producing 56,000 tons of fruits and vegetables without pesticide residues, allowing to reduce the use of phytosanitary products in about 66,800 liters.<br>\n<br>\nAlthough the use of these products is legal, the problem arises when agrochemical residues remain in the products that are available for sale and consumption by people.<br>\n<br>\nTo prevent pesticide residues from being present at levels that may pose an unacceptable risk to humans and animals, the European Commission has set and harmonized, since 2008, the maximum residue limits (MRLs) of pesticides allowed in food and feed in the European Union and has established that the member states of the European Union carry out surveillance and control programs of residues in food and feed.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it establishes pesticide residue rate limits lower than those legally allowed on its \"\" non-bio \"\" fruit and vegetables.<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to establish concrete objectives to establish lower pesticide residue rate limits than those legally allowed in its \"\" non-organic \"\" fruit and vegetables. The objective must have a specific deadline.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Pesticide residue rate lower than legal+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Pesticide_residue_rate_lower_than_legal+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Pesticide_residue_rate_lower_than_legal+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827643,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Environmental certification in fruit and vegetables",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Environmental_certification_in_fruit_and_vegetables.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Environmental certification in fruit and vegetables",
      "question": "The company's \"non-organic\" fruit and vegetable suppliers have some type of recognized environmental certification.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.3 Organic and sustainable products\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the distribution and promotion of organic products and the level of pesticide residues and sustainable origin of their fruit and vegetables.<br>\n<br>\nThe organic products business is worth 1,000 million euros in Spain, with year-on-year growth of 25%, thanks mainly to fruit, vegetables, vegetable drinks and eggs.<br>\nLidl is the chain with the best sales success in organic products with the highest share of the organic market, specifically 16.5 points, according to 2018 data from the consultancy firm Kantar Worldpanel. It is followed by Carrefour (14.7 points) and Aldi (12.4 points).",
      "methodology": "In this metric it is valued that the fruit and vegetables of the evaluated supermarkets, that although they do not have organic certification, are from sustainable agriculture, according to reference accreditations such as Global GAP, Rainforest Alliance or any certification that includes the agrochemicals used and their impact on the land, the product and the workers.<br>\nRegarding the Integrated Production model and its respective seals according to the Community, which are accredited by some supermarkets, we would only consider it if it is accompanied by other sustainable agriculture certifications such as those mentioned above.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it offers fruit and vegetables with sustainable agriculture accreditations (Global GAP, Rainforest Alliance or equivalent)<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Environmental certification in fruit and vegetables+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Environmental_certification_in_fruit_and_vegetables+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Environmental_certification_in_fruit_and_vegetables+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827654,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Green Products Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Green_Products_Strategy.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Green Products Strategy",
      "question": "The company communicates a concrete and specific strategy on the distribution and promotion of organic products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.3 Organic and sustainable products\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the distribution and promotion of organic products and the level of pesticide residues and sustainable origin of their fruit and vegetables.<br>\n<br>\nThe organic products business is worth 1,000 million euros in Spain, with year-on-year growth of 25%, thanks mainly to fruit, vegetables, vegetable drinks and eggs.<br>\nLidl is the chain with the best sales success in organic products with the highest share of the organic market, specifically 16.5 points, according to 2018 data from the consultancy firm Kantar Worldpanel. It is followed by Carrefour (14.7 points) and Aldi (12.4 points).",
      "methodology": "This question supposes a minimum level of positioning of the company in favor of organic production and although it has certain subjectivity when considering a specific policy on the commercialization of organic products, it is intended to highlight those companies that do not even they mention these types of products in their reports.<br>\nWe assign a YES to those companies that specify.<br>\n<br>\n Among the 8 supermarkets evaluated until the end of 2020, all had statements of this type, except Mercadona.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares in its reports some type of action, commitment or position with respect to organic products (describe what is its offer of bios products, its initiatives for the promotion and distribution of this type of products, etc ...).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Green Products Strategy+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Green_Products_Strategy+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Green_Products_Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827665,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Promotion of the consumption of organic products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_the_consumption_of_organic_products.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Promotion of the consumption of organic products",
      "question": "The company has participated in projects or actions to promote the consumption of organic products",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.3 Organic and sustainable products\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the distribution and promotion of organic products and the level of pesticide residues and sustainable origin of their fruit and vegetables.<br>\n<br>\nThe organic products business is worth 1,000 million euros in Spain, with year-on-year growth of 25%, thanks mainly to fruit, vegetables, vegetable drinks and eggs.<br>\nLidl is the chain with the best sales success in organic products with the highest share of the organic market, specifically 16.5 points, according to 2018 data from the consultancy firm Kantar Worldpanel. It is followed by Carrefour (14.7 points) and Aldi (12.4 points).",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it has participated in projects or actions to promote and consume organic products.<br>\n<br>\nSome good practices collected in the large distribution sector are:<br>\n<br>\n- Participation in BIO products fairs (Biocultura, Bionatura, ..).<br>\n- Elimination of VAT on fresh BIO products to make them more accessible<br>\n- Collaboration and synergies with farmers in the development of organic products<br>\n- Contest of projects and Actions in favor of organic agriculture;<br>\n- Platform for open and collaborative exchange with organic suppliers<br>\n<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Promotion of the consumption of organic products+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_the_consumption_of_organic_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_the_consumption_of_organic_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827676,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Own range of organic products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Own_range_of_organic_products.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Own range of organic products",
      "question": "The company markets a range of own brand organic products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.3 Organic and sustainable products\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the distribution and promotion of organic products and the level of pesticide residues and sustainable origin of their fruit and vegetables.<br>\n<br>\nThe organic products business is worth 1,000 million euros in Spain, with year-on-year growth of 25%, thanks mainly to fruit, vegetables, vegetable drinks and eggs.<br>\nLidl is the chain with the best sales success in organic products with the highest share of the organic market, specifically 16.5 points, according to 2018 data from the consultancy firm Kantar Worldpanel. It is followed by Carrefour (14.7 points) and Aldi (12.4 points).",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company markets a range of its own brand of organic products with at least 3 categories of food and 3 references for each category<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)<br>\n<br>\nIf the company does not publish this information in its reports, check its assortment in its online store, in a physical store, on the Openfoodfact platform (https://es.openfoodfacts.org/) or simply by calling Customer Service.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Own range of organic products+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Own_range_of_organic_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Own_range_of_organic_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827687,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Support to suppliers in the conversion to organic production",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Support_to_suppliers_in_the_conversion_to_organic_production.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Support to suppliers in the conversion to organic production",
      "question": "The company develops policies or initiatives to help its local suppliers migrate towards an ecological production model.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.3 Organic and sustainable products\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the distribution and promotion of organic products and the level of pesticide residues and sustainable origin of their fruit and vegetables.<br>\n<br>\nThe organic products business is worth 1,000 million euros in Spain, with year-on-year growth of 25%, thanks mainly to fruit, vegetables, vegetable drinks and eggs.<br>\nLidl is the chain with the best sales success in organic products with the highest share of the organic market, specifically 16.5 points, according to 2018 data from the consultancy firm Kantar Worldpanel. It is followed by Carrefour (14.7 points) and Aldi (12.4 points).",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to develop policies or initiatives to help its local suppliers to migrate towards an ecological production model or to improve the one they already have.<br>\n<br>\nAn example of good practice in this regard are the agreements signed by Carrefour with its suppliers in 2019 for collaboration from production to<br>\nlong-term guaranteeing prices, or the commitments of this company to accompany local producers in their transition to<br>\nthe farm changes needed to address the production of organic products<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Support to suppliers in the conversion to organic production+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Support_to_suppliers_in_the_conversion_to_organic_production+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Support_to_suppliers_in_the_conversion_to_organic_production+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827698,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Top 1 in organic products sales",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Top_1_in_organic_products_sales.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Top 1 in organic products sales",
      "question": "The company has the largest market share of organic food products in Spain.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "According to the latest annual study by the consulting firm Kantar Worldpanel on the market share of organic products among all Spanish supermarket chains in 2019 Lidl has positioned itself at the top with 16.5 points, followed by Carrefour (14.7 points) and Aldi ( 12.4 points).",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company has the largest market share in Spain for the sale of organic products.<br>\n<br>\nThe data must correspond to updated information from at least one year ago and come from reliable sources of Consultants or public organizations: Kantar, Statista, Nielsen, IRI Infoscan, INE (National Institute of Statistics) ...).<br>\nThis information can be found on the internet through digital media specialized in Large distribution: Foodretail, Revistamercados, Alimarket, etc .....<br>\nThe consulting firm Kantar Worldpanel usually publishes an annual study on the market share of organic products among all Spanish supermarket chains.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Top 1 in organic products sales+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Top_1_in_organic_products_sales+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Top_1_in_organic_products_sales+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827709,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Top 2 in organic products sales",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Top_2_in_organic_products_sales.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Top 2 in organic products sales",
      "question": "The company is one of the 2 with the largest market share of organic food products in Spain.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "According to the latest annual study by the consulting firm Kantar Worldpanel on the market share of organic products among all Spanish supermarket chains in 2019 Lidl has positioned itself at the top with 16.5 points, followed by Carrefour (14.7 points) and Aldi ( 12.4 points).",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company is among the 2 with the largest market share in Spain for the sale of organic products.<br>\n<br>\nThe data must correspond to updated information from at least one year ago and come from reliable sources of Consultants or public organizations: Kantar, Statista, Nielsen, IRI Infoscan, INE (National Institute of Statistics) ...).<br>\nThis information can be found on the internet through digital media specialized in Large distribution: Foodretail, Revistamercados, Alimarket, etc .....<br>\nThe consulting firm Kantar Worldpanel usually publishes an annual study on the market share of organic products among all Spanish supermarket chains.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Top 2 in organic products sales+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Top_2_in_organic_products_sales+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Top_2_in_organic_products_sales+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827720,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Top 3 in organic products sales",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Top_3_in_organic_products_sales.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Top 3 in organic products sales",
      "question": "The company is one of the 3 companies with the largest market share of organic food products in Spain.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "According to the latest annual study by the consulting firm Kantar Worldpanel on the market share of organic products among all Spanish supermarket chains in 2019 Lidl has positioned itself at the top with 16.5 points, followed by Carrefour (14.7 points) and Aldi ( 12.4 points).",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company is among the 3 with the largest market share in Spain for the sale of organic products.<br>\n<br>\nThe data must correspond to updated information from at least one year ago and come from reliable sources of Consultants or public organizations: Kantar, Statista, Nielsen, IRI Infoscan, INE (National Institute of Statistics) ...).<br>\nThis information can be found on the internet through digital media specialized in Large distribution: Foodretail, Revistamercados, Alimarket, etc .....<br>\nThe consulting firm Kantar Worldpanel usually publishes an annual study on the market share of organic products among all Spanish supermarket chains.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Top 3 in organic products sales+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Top_3_in_organic_products_sales+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Top_3_in_organic_products_sales+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827731,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Wood and derivatives purchase policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Wood_and_derivatives_purchase_policy.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Wood and derivatives purchase policy",
      "question": "The company publishes a comprehensive and updated Policy for the sustainable purchase of wood and derivatives.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.4 Wood and paper\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we intend to make known and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the recycled and sustainable origin of the raw material of forest origin used both in the elements used by their customers and collaborators (paper bags, material advertising and office), as in the assortment of own brand products on the shelves.<br>\nThese policies are summarized in the following 3 areas of action in terms of the sustainable use of wood, paper and cardboard:<br>\n<br>\n- Certifications that guarantee the sustainability of these raw materials (FSC, PEFC, ECOLABEL, ..)<br>\n- Recycled Paper / Cardboard / Wood (PCM)<br>\n- Initiatives of reduction (less quantity of paper / wood used), of replacement (by digitization actions such as digital purchase receipt, ...) or elimination (such as the non-distribution of paper brochures)",
      "methodology": "A responsible policy for the purchase of wood and derivatives by a retail company must apply both to articles for internal use such as office paper, business cards, stationery (pencils, notebooks, etc.) and other products derived from wood, such as toilet paper, kitchen paper or napkins), as well as own-brand products (primary packaging of food products mainly) and press and advertising materials that contain or are made of the following materials:<br>\n<br>\n- Wood (solid wood, wood products)<br>\n- Cellulose (paper, cardboard)<br>\n- Viscose and cellulose-based non-woven fibers (hygiene, cleaning products and household items)<br>\n- Bamboo<br>\n<br>\n This Policy must be based on specific actions and objectives in relation to the commercialization and supply of these raw materials for own brand products and material in stores and offices. It must include a strategic approach basically focused on the Conservation of resources.<br>\n The use of recycled materials is the most indicated, but if virgin fiber is to be used, it must come from at least a certified source (by the Forest Stewardship Council� (FSC) for example)<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company must clearly document and publish a specific and comprehensive policy regarding the purchase and use of wood and paper in the aforementioned terms by means of an individual document or clearly differentiated in any of its non-financial reports.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Wood and derivatives purchase policy+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Wood_and_derivatives_purchase_policy+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Wood_and_derivatives_purchase_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827748,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Use of sustainable paper in stores and offices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Use_of_sustainable_paper_in_stores_and_offices.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Use of sustainable paper in stores and offices",
      "question": "The company uses sustainable paper, cardboard and wood for most of its material in stores and offices.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Currently among the main certifications and reference standards are:<br>\n<br>\n- Forest Stewardship Council� (FSC�). The FSC� logo designates wood products and derivatives from responsible forest management according to its international environmental and social standards. The certification consists of ten principles of sustainability that the wood or paper product must comply with: full evidence must be provided about the wood production chain, the wood must not come from protected forests or reserved areas, rights must be protected of indigenous tribes and the ecological balance of the forest area must be preserved in the long term.<br>\nwww.es.fsc.org<br>\n<br>\n- Program for the Endorsement of Forest Certifcation (PEFC �). The PEFC � logo distinguishes wood and paper products from sustainable forest management. PEFC �, from the English Program for the Endorsement of Forest Certifcation, is a transparent and independent system that guarantees sustainable forest management. The PEFC � regulation encompasses environmental, economic and social aspects that must be fulfilled as a precondition for the PEFC � logo to be awarded. For example, no more trees can be cut than remain and forests must be a safe space for animals and plants. Furthermore, the rights of people who live and / or depend on the forest must be protected. Compliance with these requirements is periodically verified by independent organizations.<br>\nwww.pefc.es<br>\n<br>\n- The EU Ecolabel. The EU ecolabel was created by the European Commission in 1992 and identifies products and services that have a low environmental impact compared to other similar products.<br>\nwww.ecolabel.eu",
      "methodology": "Examples of elements in the store and office are promotional material (brochures, catalogs, ...), office material, paper bags, fruit and vegetable packaging, gift packaging, tickets (cash, cut sections, parking ,. .).<br>\n<br>\n What we consider as the sustainable use of paper is that which guarantees the responsible management of forests. This today can only be accredited by reference and highly recognized certifications such as FSC, PEFC and ECOLABEL.<br>\nHowever, there is another even more sustainable policy considered in this question that is the use of the famous 5Rs of the Circular Economy (Recycle, Reuse, Replace, Reduce or Reject the paper consumed by distributors in their stores and offices<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to use certified sustainable or recycled paper in its materials in commercial stores or offices, or it applies policies to reduce its consumption or eliminate it with digitization processes.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Use of sustainable paper in stores and offices+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Use_of_sustainable_paper_in_stores_and_offices+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Use_of_sustainable_paper_in_stores_and_offices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827759,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of paper consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_paper_consumption.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of paper consumption",
      "question": "The company has reduced its consumption of paper and cardboard vs. last year.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.4 Wood and paper\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we intend to make known and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the recycled and sustainable origin of the raw material of forest origin used both in the elements used by their customers and collaborators (paper bags, material advertising and office), as in the assortment of own brand products on the shelves.<br>\nThese policies are summarized in the following 3 areas of action in terms of the sustainable use of wood, paper and cardboard:<br>\n<br>\n- Certifications that guarantee the sustainability of these raw materials (FSC, PEFC, ECOLABEL, ..)<br>\n- Recycled Paper / Cardboard / Wood (PCM)<br>\n- Initiatives of reduction (less quantity of paper / wood used), of replacement (by digitization actions such as digital purchase receipt, ...) or elimination (such as the non-distribution of paper brochures)",
      "methodology": "<p>We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br><br>- The company has reduced the weight of paper and cardboard consumed (Advertising brochures, Magazines, Purchase tickets, consumed at Headquarters) compared to the previous year.<br>This metric does not consider the consumption of paper and cardboard used in the manufacture of its own brand.<br>If the company does not declare that it has reduced said consumption, it must report the weight of the paper and cardboard consumed for both the year of the report and the previous year in order to verify said reduction<br><br><br>This information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br><br>- Annual memory<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>- Sustainability Report<br>- Environmental Report<br>- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of paper consumption+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_paper_consumption+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_paper_consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827770,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable paper and wood in all packaging and products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_paper_and_wood_in_all_packaging_and_products.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Sustainable paper and wood in all packaging and products",
      "question": "The company uses certified or recycled paper/cardboard/wood in all its own brand products and packaging or sets specific goals to do so.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Currently among the main certifications and reference standards are:<br>\n<br>\n- Forest Stewardship Council� (FSC�). The FSC� logo designates wood products and derivatives from responsible forest management according to its international environmental and social standards. The certification consists of ten principles of sustainability that the wood or paper product must comply with: full evidence must be provided about the wood production chain, the wood must not come from protected forests or reserved areas, rights must be protected of indigenous tribes and the ecological balance of the forest area must be preserved in the long term.<br>\nwww.es.fsc.org<br>\n<br>\n- Program for the Endorsement of Forest Certifcation (PEFC �). The PEFC � logo distinguishes wood and paper products from sustainable forest management. PEFC �, from the English Program for the Endorsement of Forest Certifcation, is a transparent and independent system that guarantees sustainable forest management. The PEFC � regulation encompasses environmental, economic and social aspects that must be fulfilled as a precondition for the PEFC � logo to be awarded. For example, no more trees can be cut than remain and forests must be a safe space for animals and plants. Furthermore, the rights of people who live and / or depend on the forest must be protected. Compliance with these requirements is periodically verified by independent organizations.<br>\nwww.pefc.es<br>\n<br>\n- The EU Ecolabel. The EU ecolabel was created by the European Commission in 1992 and identifies products and services that have a low environmental impact compared to other similar products.<br>\nwww.ecolabel.eu",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to use certified or recycled paper / cardboard / wood in all its own brand products and packaging<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company declares a specific objective of using certified or recycled paper / cardboard / wood in all its own brand products and packaging. A specific deadline must be included.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable paper and wood in all packaging and products+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_paper_and_wood_in_all_packaging_and_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_paper_and_wood_in_all_packaging_and_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827781,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable paper and wood in some packaging and products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_paper_and_wood_in_some_packaging_and_products.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Sustainable paper and wood in some packaging and products",
      "question": "The company uses certified or recycled paper/cardboard/wood in some private label products and packaging.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Currently among the main certifications and reference standards are:<br>\n<br>\n- Forest Stewardship Council� (FSC�). The FSC� logo designates wood products and derivatives from responsible forest management according to its international environmental and social standards. The certification consists of ten principles of sustainability that the wood or paper product must comply with: full evidence must be provided about the wood production chain, the wood must not come from protected forests or reserved areas, rights must be protected of indigenous tribes and the ecological balance of the forest area must be preserved in the long term.<br>\nwww.es.fsc.org<br>\n<br>\n- Program for the Endorsement of Forest Certifcation (PEFC �). The PEFC � logo distinguishes wood and paper products from sustainable forest management. PEFC �, from the English Program for the Endorsement of Forest Certifcation, is a transparent and independent system that guarantees sustainable forest management. The PEFC � regulation encompasses environmental, economic and social aspects that must be fulfilled as a precondition for the PEFC � logo to be awarded. For example, no more trees can be cut than remain and forests must be a safe space for animals and plants. Furthermore, the rights of people who live and / or depend on the forest must be protected. Compliance with these requirements is periodically verified by independent organizations.<br>\nwww.pefc.es<br>\n<br>\n- The EU Ecolabel. The EU ecolabel was created by the European Commission in 1992 and identifies products and services that have a low environmental impact compared to other similar products.<br>\nwww.ecolabel.eu",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it uses certified or recycled paper / cardboard / wood in some own brand products and packaging. You must specify in what type of products and the certifications used.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable paper and wood in some packaging and products+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_paper_and_wood_in_some_packaging_and_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_paper_and_wood_in_some_packaging_and_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827792,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Requirements to suppliers of wood and derivatives",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Requirements_to_suppliers_of_wood_and_derivatives.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Requirements to suppliers of wood and derivatives",
      "question": "The company demands from its suppliers sustainability and traceability criteria in the use of wood and derivatives",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.4 Wood and paper\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we intend to make known and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the recycled and sustainable origin of the raw material of forest origin used both in the elements used by their customers and collaborators (paper bags, material advertising and office), as in the assortment of own brand products on the shelves.<br>\nThese policies are summarized in the following 3 areas of action in terms of the sustainable use of wood, paper and cardboard:<br>\n<br>\n- Certifications that guarantee the sustainability of these raw materials (FSC, PEFC, ECOLABEL, ..)<br>\n- Recycled Paper / Cardboard / Wood (PCM)<br>\n- Initiatives of reduction (less quantity of paper / wood used), of replacement (by digitization actions such as digital purchase receipt, ...) or elimination (such as the non-distribution of paper brochures)",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it requires sustainability and traceability criteria in the use of wood and its derivatives from all its own brand suppliers. These requirements must be materialized in Codes of Conduct, binding agreements, clauses in their Policies for the purchase of wood and cellulose, etc.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company does not declare that it requires these conditions from its suppliers, however, most of its own brand wood and paper products are certified (FSC, PFC).<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Requirements to suppliers of wood and derivatives+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Requirements_to_suppliers_of_wood_and_derivatives+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Requirements_to_suppliers_of_wood_and_derivatives+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827803,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Innovative initiatives on sustainable use of paper",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Innovative_initiatives_on_sustainable_use_of_paper.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Innovative initiatives on sustainable use of paper",
      "question": "The company has developed some relevant and innovative initiative related to the sustainable use of paper / cardboard / wood (substitution, reduction,).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.4 Wood and paper\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we intend to make known and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the recycled and sustainable origin of the raw material of forest origin used both in the elements used by their customers and collaborators (paper bags, material advertising and office), as in the assortment of own brand products on the shelves.<br>\nThese policies are summarized in the following 3 areas of action in terms of the sustainable use of wood, paper and cardboard:<br>\n<br>\n- Certifications that guarantee the sustainability of these raw materials (FSC, PEFC, ECOLABEL, ..)<br>\n- Recycled Paper / Cardboard / Wood (PCM)<br>\n- Initiatives of reduction (less quantity of paper / wood used), of replacement (by digitization actions such as digital purchase receipt, ...) or elimination (such as the non-distribution of paper brochures)",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it has developed a relevant and innovative initiative aimed at replacing or reducing paper or its more sustainable use.<br>\n<br>\nAmong the actions carried out by supermarkets in this regard, the following stand out:<br>\n<br>\n- The implementation of measures such as digitalization to eliminate paper both in stores, central offices and offices (eg digitalization of the purchase receipt at Carrefour).<br>\n- Elimination or non-use of advertising on paper (brochures, flyers, ...) by Mercadona.<br>\n<br>\nRegarding certification, we only value the substitution of conventional paper / cardboard for the certificate, not the substitution of other materials (usually plastic) for certified cardboard / paper.<br>\n<br>\nWe can find this information by visiting the stores of the companies evaluated or in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Innovative initiatives on sustainable use of paper+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Innovative_initiatives_on_sustainable_use_of_paper+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Innovative_initiatives_on_sustainable_use_of_paper+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827814,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Responsible palm oil policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Responsible_palm_oil_policy.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Responsible palm oil policy",
      "question": "The company recognizes the impact of palm oil and communicates a responsible policy around its own brand sourcing.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "A specific policy on the use of palm oil is a first step in any food chain towards recognizing the impact that this monoculture has caused and is causing on both biodiversity and the environment.<br>\nThe Great Distribution cannot ignore in its reports such a controversial issue as the role of monocultures in the degradation of Biodiversity.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n-  The company<br>\npublishes a comprehensive policy on the purchase of palm oil for its food, cosmetic and hygiene products, based on specific actions and commitments.<br>\nSaid policy must include some type of statement of recognition and the positioning of the company regarding the use of palm oil in its own brand products, in addition to being presented as an individual or clearly differentiated document in any of its non-financial reports. .<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Responsible palm oil policy+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Responsible_palm_oil_policy+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Responsible_palm_oil_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827825,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable palm oil in all hygiene and cosmetic products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_palm_oil_in_all_hygiene_and_cosmetic_products.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Sustainable palm oil in all hygiene and cosmetic products",
      "question": "The company avoids palm fat wherever possible or is of certified organic or sustainable origin in all its own-brand cosmetic and hygiene products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Regarding the use of palm oil by the food chains, we have adopted the following assessment spectrum and best practices in order from best (1) to least negative impact (3):<br>\n<br>\n1) Elimination of palm oil, replacing it wherever possible with \"\" sustainable \"\" fats, of proximity and free from deforestation, such as sunflower or rapeseed oil<br>\n2) Use of organic palm oil<br>\n3) Use of RSPO certified palm oil (CSPO)<br>\n<br>\nWe consider the best practice regarding the use of palm oil to eliminate it, replacing it with healthier and more environmentally sustainable vegetable fats such as sunflower oil, ... above the use of certified palm oil, which we estimate should be second option, for those products in which the substitution of palm fat is technically more complicated.<br>\n<br>\nThe CSPO (Certified Sustainable Palm Oil) certification of the Round Table for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) establishes criteria and auditing systems that aim to ensure that production respects labor rights and indigenous communities, that new areas are not occupied of high environmental value and that biodiversity is not threatened, in addition to promoting cleaner agricultural practices. Now, according to the Organization of Consumers and Users (OCU), this organization fulfills its objectives, but with nuances:<br>\n<br>\n- It is valid for new plantations, but it does not solve the problems created in the past by companies that are now members of the RSPO.<br>\n- It can be improved, since there are aspects such as climate change or the prohibition of especially dangerous pesticides, such as paraquat, that have not yet been addressed.<br>\n- Impact studies have not yet been carried out to guarantee that they really represent an improvement on the ground.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to avoid palm fat where possible or it is of certified ecological or sustainable origin (CSPO, Certified Sustainable Palm Oil) in all its own brand cosmetic and hygiene products<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable palm oil in all hygiene and cosmetic products+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_palm_oil_in_all_hygiene_and_cosmetic_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_palm_oil_in_all_hygiene_and_cosmetic_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827836,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable palm oil in 50% of hygiene and cosmetic products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_palm_oil_in_50_of_hygiene_and_cosmetic_products.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Sustainable palm oil in 50% of hygiene and cosmetic products",
      "question": "The company avoids palm fat wherever possible or it is of certified organic or sustainable origin in more than 50% of its own-brand cosmetic and hygiene products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Regarding the use of palm oil by the food chains, we have adopted the following assessment spectrum and best practices in order from best (1) to least negative impact (3):<br>\n<br>\n1) Elimination of palm oil, replacing it wherever possible with \"\" sustainable \"\" fats, of proximity and free from deforestation, such as sunflower or rapeseed oil<br>\n2) Use of organic palm oil<br>\n3) Use of RSPO certified palm oil (CSPO)<br>\n<br>\nWe consider the best practice regarding the use of palm oil to eliminate it, replacing it with healthier and more environmentally sustainable vegetable fats such as sunflower oil, ... above the use of certified palm oil, which we estimate should be second option, for those products in which the substitution of palm fat is technically more complicated.<br>\n<br>\nThe CSPO (Certified Sustainable Palm Oil) certification of the Round Table for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) establishes criteria and auditing systems that aim to ensure that production respects labor rights and indigenous communities, that new areas are not occupied of high environmental value and that biodiversity is not threatened, in addition to promoting cleaner agricultural practices. Now, according to the Organization of Consumers and Users (OCU), this organization fulfills its objectives, but with nuances:<br>\n<br>\n- It is valid for new plantations, but it does not solve the problems created in the past by companies that are now members of the RSPO.<br>\n- It can be improved, since there are aspects such as climate change or the prohibition of especially dangerous pesticides, such as paraquat, that have not yet been addressed.<br>\n- Impact studies have not yet been carried out to guarantee that they really represent an improvement on the ground.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to avoid palm fat wherever possible or it is of certified ecological or sustainable origin (CSPO, Certified Sustainable Palm Oil) in at least 50% of its own brand cosmetic and hygiene products<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable palm oil in 50% of hygiene and cosmetic products+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_palm_oil_in_50_of_hygiene_and_cosmetic_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_palm_oil_in_50_of_hygiene_and_cosmetic_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827847,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable palm oil in all food products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_palm_oil_in_all_food_products.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Sustainable palm oil in all food products",
      "question": "The company avoids palm fat \"where possible\" or it is of certified organic or sustainable origin in all its own brand food products or sets a specific goal to do so within the next 3 years.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Regarding the use of palm oil by the food chains, we have adopted the following assessment spectrum and best practices in order from best (1) to least negative impact (3):<br>\n<br>\n1) Elimination of palm oil, replacing it wherever possible with \"\" sustainable \"\" fats, of proximity and free from deforestation, such as sunflower or rapeseed oil<br>\n2) Use of organic palm oil<br>\n3) Use of RSPO certified palm oil (CSPO)<br>\n<br>\nWe consider the best practice regarding the use of palm oil to eliminate it, replacing it with healthier and more environmentally sustainable vegetable fats such as sunflower oil, ... above the use of certified palm oil, which we estimate should be second option, for those products in which the substitution of palm fat is technically more complicated.<br>\n<br>\nThe CSPO (Certified Sustainable Palm Oil) certification of the Round Table for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) establishes criteria and auditing systems that aim to ensure that production respects labor rights and indigenous communities, that new areas are not occupied of high environmental value and that biodiversity is not threatened, in addition to promoting cleaner agricultural practices. Now, according to the Organization of Consumers and Users (OCU), this organization fulfills its objectives, but with nuances:<br>\n<br>\n- It is valid for new plantations, but it does not solve the problems created in the past by companies that are now members of the RSPO.<br>\n- It can be improved, since there are aspects such as climate change or the prohibition of especially dangerous pesticides, such as paraquat, that have not yet been addressed.<br>\n- Impact studies have not yet been carried out to guarantee that they really represent an improvement on the ground.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to avoid palm fat where possible or it is of certified organic or sustainable origin (CSPO, Certified Sustainable Palm Oil) in all its own brand food products<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company sets a specific goal to avoid palm fat where possible or where it is of certified organic or sustainable origin (CSPO, Certified Sustainable Palm Oil) in all its own brand food products in the next 3 years.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable palm oil in all food products+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_palm_oil_in_all_food_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_palm_oil_in_all_food_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827858,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Elimination of palm oil in some products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_palm_oil_in_some_products.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Elimination of palm oil in some products",
      "question": "The company reports that it has removed palm fat from some private label products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Regarding the use of palm oil by the food chains, we have adopted the following assessment spectrum and best practices in order from best (1) to least negative impact (3):<br>\n<br>\n1) Elimination of palm oil, replacing it wherever possible with \"\" sustainable \"\" fats, of proximity and free from deforestation, such as sunflower or rapeseed oil<br>\n2) Use of organic palm oil<br>\n3) Use of RSPO certified palm oil (CSPO)<br>\n<br>\nWe consider the best practice regarding the use of palm oil to eliminate it, replacing it with healthier and more environmentally sustainable vegetable fats such as sunflower oil, ... above the use of certified palm oil, which we estimate should be second option, for those products in which the substitution of palm fat is technically more complicated.<br>\n<br>\nThe CSPO (Certified Sustainable Palm Oil) certification of the Round Table for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) establishes criteria and auditing systems that aim to ensure that production respects labor rights and indigenous communities, that new areas are not occupied of high environmental value and that biodiversity is not threatened, in addition to promoting cleaner agricultural practices. Now, according to the Organization of Consumers and Users (OCU), this organization fulfills its objectives, but with nuances:<br>\n<br>\n- It is valid for new plantations, but it does not solve the problems created in the past by companies that are now members of the RSPO.<br>\n- It can be improved, since there are aspects such as climate change or the prohibition of especially dangerous pesticides, such as paraquat, that have not yet been addressed.<br>\n- Impact studies have not yet been carried out to guarantee that they really represent an improvement on the ground.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it has eliminated palm fat in some of its own brand products and is not replacing it with another \"\" conflict \"\" monoculture.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company has eliminated palm fat from all its own brand products<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Elimination of palm oil in some products+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_palm_oil_in_some_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_palm_oil_in_some_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827869,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Responsible policy on the use of soy in animal feed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Responsible_policy_on_the_use_of_soy_in_animal_feed.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Responsible policy on the use of soy in animal feed",
      "question": "The company recognizes the environmental impact of soy and communicates a responsible policy for its use in animal feed of its own brand products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "According to a report by the Dutch committee of the IUCN and the organization The Sustainable Trade Initiative (IDH), only 22% of the soy used in Europe in 2017 met the standards or criteria established by the European Federation of Feed Manufacturers (European Feed Manufacturers' Federation, FEFAC), to consider such soy \"sustainable\" or free from deforestation. As Greenpeace points out in its report \"Enganchados a la carne\": \"Beyond the doubts about the traceability and rigor of these standards created by the feed industry itself, it is a very relevant fact that not a single ton of soybeans the industry considers the Spanish market as \"sustainable\" in 2017.",
      "methodology": "With this question, we demand that companies communicate at least one specific policy on the use of soy in animal feed for their own brand products, such as meat, fish and milk. This policy, which must be supported by initiatives and concrete objectives constitutes the first step by supermarkets in their scale of responsibility and performance in this matter, based on their recognition of the impact of this monoculture on deforestation.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company communicates a specific policy on the use of soy in animal feed for its own brand products, such as meat, fish and milk. This policy, which must be supported by specific initiatives and objectives, constitutes the first step by supermarkets in their scale of responsibility and performance in this matter, based on their recognition of the impact of soy on deforestation.<br>\nSaid policy must be presented by means of an individual document or clearly differentiated in one of its non-financial reports.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- Relevant sources are omitted within each type of emissions, such as<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Responsible policy on the use of soy in animal feed+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Responsible_policy_on_the_use_of_soy_in_animal_feed+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Responsible_policy_on_the_use_of_soy_in_animal_feed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827880,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+The animal feed of 100% of products is with sustainable soy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+The_animal_feed_of_100_of_products_is_with_sustainable_soy.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "The animal feed of 100% of products is with sustainable soy",
      "question": "The company uses sustainable soy in animal feed for 100% of its own brand products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "For food chains, whether by using soy directly in their products or indirectly through livestock feeding of their own brand products, there are potentially serious reputational risks in their supply chains. The reason is that There is no legal requirement that requires companies to document the geographical origin of soybeans, or, failing that, to provide evidence that it has been produced legally, without causing environmental or human damage. In this sense, their situation is very similar to that of palm oil, which, like this monoculture, has certification standards that in principle prove that it has been produced in a sustainable way:<br>\n<br>\n- The International Association for Responsible Soy (RTRS) is an international initiative in which soy producers, traders and processors work together with banks and social organizations to ensure the sustainable cultivation of soy worldwide, as well as the social responsibility of the soy sector. the soy.<br>\n- Standards or criteria established by the European Feed Manufacturers' Federation (FEFAC), to consider soy \"sustainable\" or free from deforestation<br>\n- Pro terra certification. Based on the Basel criteria, developed by WWF and COOP Switzerland, ProTerra is a certification standard that covers environmental sustainability, genetic modification, health and safety, social responsibility, human rights, traceability among others.<br>\n<br>\nBut like RSPO for palm oil, these standards are not without criticism and doubts regarding their traceability, rigor, and effectiveness in actually avoiding monocultures and their impacts on biodiversity. These standards have been created by the industry itself (manufacturers of food and feed products)<br>\n<br>\nEven so, we value with this metric that supermarkets, as the main agents in the chain of production and distribution related to this raw material, adhere to these standards of \"\" sustainable soy \"\" or \"\" free from deforestation \"\". At the moment, in the absence of stricter elements that allow us to really know the sustainable origin of this monoculture, we consider the adoption of these certifications as the best practice for obtaining soy from the supermarket's own brand products",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to use sustainable soy in animal feed for 100% of its own brand products (chicken, pork, beef, milk, farmed fish).<br>\nSustainable soy is understood to be that coming from any of the following certification standards:<br>\n<br>\n- The International Association for Responsible Soy (RTRS)<br>\n- Standards or criteria established by the European Feed Manufacturers' Federation (FEFAC),<br>\n- Pro terra certification. Based on the Basel criteria, developed by WWF and COOP Switzerland,<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+The animal feed of 100% of products is with sustainable soy+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+The_animal_feed_of_100_of_products_is_with_sustainable_soy+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+The_animal_feed_of_100_of_products_is_with_sustainable_soy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827891,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+The animal feed of 50% of products is with sustainable soy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+The_animal_feed_of_50_of_products_is_with_sustainable_soy.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "The animal feed of 50% of products is with sustainable soy",
      "question": "The company uses sustainable soy in animal feed for 50% of its own brand products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "For food chains, whether by using soy directly in their products or indirectly through livestock feeding of their own brand products, there are potentially serious reputational risks in their supply chains. The reason is that There is no legal requirement that requires companies to document the geographical origin of soybeans, or, failing that, to provide evidence that it has been produced legally, without causing environmental or human damage. In this sense, their situation is very similar to that of palm oil, which, like this monoculture, has certification standards that in principle prove that it has been produced in a sustainable way:<br>\n<br>\n- The International Association for Responsible Soy (RTRS) is an international initiative in which soy producers, traders and processors work together with banks and social organizations to ensure the sustainable cultivation of soy worldwide, as well as the social responsibility of the soy sector. the soy.<br>\n- Standards or criteria established by the European Feed Manufacturers' Federation (FEFAC), to consider soy \"sustainable\" or free from deforestation<br>\n- Pro terra certification. Based on the Basel criteria, developed by WWF and COOP Switzerland, ProTerra is a certification standard that covers environmental sustainability, genetic modification, health and safety, social responsibility, human rights, traceability among others.<br>\n<br>\nBut like RSPO for palm oil, these standards are not without criticism and doubts regarding their traceability, rigor, and effectiveness in actually avoiding monocultures and their impacts on biodiversity. These standards have been created by the industry itself (manufacturers of food and feed products)<br>\n<br>\nEven so, we value with this metric that supermarkets, as the main agents in the chain of production and distribution related to this raw material, adhere to these standards of \"\" sustainable soy \"\" or \"\" free from deforestation \"\". At the moment, in the absence of stricter elements that allow us to really know the sustainable origin of this monoculture, we consider the adoption of these certifications as the best practice for obtaining soy from the supermarket's own brand products",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it uses sustainable soy in animal feed for 50% of its own brand products (chicken, pork, beef, milk, farmed fish).<br>\nSustainable soy is understood to be that coming from any of the following certification standards:<br>\n<br>\n- The International Association for Responsible Soy (RTRS)<br>\n- Standards or criteria established by the European Feed Manufacturers' Federation (FEFAC),<br>\n- Pro terra certification. Based on the Basel criteria, developed by WWF and COOP Switzerland,<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+The animal feed of 50% of products is with sustainable soy+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+The_animal_feed_of_50_of_products_is_with_sustainable_soy+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+The_animal_feed_of_50_of_products_is_with_sustainable_soy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827902,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+The animal feed of some products is with sustainable soy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+The_animal_feed_of_some_products_is_with_sustainable_soy.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "The animal feed of some products is with sustainable soy",
      "question": "The company uses sustainable soy in animal feed for part of its own brand products .",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "For food chains, whether by using soy directly in their products or indirectly through livestock feeding of their own brand products, there are potentially serious reputational risks in their supply chains. The reason is that There is no legal requirement that requires companies to document the geographical origin of soybeans, or, failing that, to provide evidence that it has been produced legally, without causing environmental or human damage. In this sense, their situation is very similar to that of palm oil, which, like this monoculture, has certification standards that in principle prove that it has been produced in a sustainable way:<br>\n<br>\n- The International Association for Responsible Soy (RTRS) is an international initiative in which soy producers, traders and processors work together with banks and social organizations to ensure the sustainable cultivation of soy worldwide, as well as the social responsibility of the soy sector. the soy.<br>\n- Standards or criteria established by the European Feed Manufacturers' Federation (FEFAC), to consider soy \"sustainable\" or free from deforestation<br>\n- Pro terra certification. Based on the Basel criteria, developed by WWF and COOP Switzerland, ProTerra is a certification standard that covers environmental sustainability, genetic modification, health and safety, social responsibility, human rights, traceability among others.<br>\n<br>\nBut like RSPO for palm oil, these standards are not without criticism and doubts regarding their traceability, rigor, and effectiveness in actually avoiding monocultures and their impacts on biodiversity. These standards have been created by the industry itself (manufacturers of food and feed products)<br>\n<br>\nEven so, we value with this metric that supermarkets, as the main agents in the chain of production and distribution related to this raw material, adhere to these standards of \"\" sustainable soy \"\" or \"\" free from deforestation \"\". At the moment, in the absence of stricter elements that allow us to really know the sustainable origin of this monoculture, we consider the adoption of these certifications as the best practice for obtaining soy from the supermarket's own brand products",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it uses sustainable soy in animal feed for a significant number of its own brand products (in number of references, complete ranges by product or animal species).<br>\n<br>\nSustainable soy is understood to be that coming from any of the following certification standards:<br>\n<br>\n- The International Association for Responsible Soy (RTRS)<br>\n- Standards or criteria established by the European Feed Manufacturers' Federation (FEFAC),<br>\n- Pro terra certification. Based on the Basel criteria, developed by WWF and COOP Switzerland,<br>\n<br>\n- The company communicates a sustainable soy policy of general application to all its products of animal origin (in Spain or at least in one of the subsidiaries in the case of transnational companies).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+The animal feed of some products is with sustainable soy+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+The_animal_feed_of_some_products_is_with_sustainable_soy+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+The_animal_feed_of_some_products_is_with_sustainable_soy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827913,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable soy in all vegetarian products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_soy_in_all_vegetarian_products.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Sustainable soy in all vegetarian products",
      "question": "The company uses sustainable or European-sourced soy in 100% of its vegetarian or vegan products or sets it as a target by 2022.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.5 Monocultures\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main retailers in Spain regarding the use of monocultures (palm oil, soy and cotton) in their own-brand products and their recognition of their environmental impact.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it uses sustainable or European-origin soy in 100% of its vegetarian or vegan products<br>\nSustainable soy is understood to be that coming from any of the following certification standards:<br>\n<br>\n- The International Association for Responsible Soy (RTRS)<br>\n- Standards or criteria established by the European Feed Manufacturers' Federation (FEFAC),<br>\n- Pro terra certification. Based on the Basel criteria, developed by WWF and COOP Switzerland,<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to establish as a goal to use sustainable or European-origin soy in 100% of its vegetarian or vegan products by 2025<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable soy in all vegetarian products+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_soy_in_all_vegetarian_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_soy_in_all_vegetarian_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827924,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Absence of GMOs in 100% of own brand animal feed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Absence_of_GMOs_in_100_of_own_brand_animal_feed.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Absence of GMOs in 100% of own brand animal feed",
      "question": "The company communicates that it does not use GMOs in the animal feed of any of its own brand fresh products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.6 Genetic modification\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the performance of the main distributors in Spain in relation to the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the animal feed of their own-brand products.<br>\nWe are not referring to the distributors' fresh or packaged finished products, which by law must not contain GMOs. In this respect, statements such as \"No products of our brands contain genetically modified organisms (GMOs)\" are meaningless. What we evaluate is the animal feed of fresh products (meat, poultry, fish,...). Excluded from this section would be certified \"organic\" products, which by law should not be exposed to genetically modified feed.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company communicates that it does not use GMOs in the animal feed of any of its own brand fresh products.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Absence of GMOs in 100% of own brand animal feed+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Absence_of_GMOs_in_100_of_own_brand_animal_feed+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Absence_of_GMOs_in_100_of_own_brand_animal_feed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827935,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Objective of eliminating GMOs from own brand",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Objective_of_eliminating_GMOs_from_own_brand.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Objective of eliminating GMOs from own brand",
      "question": "The company sets a goal to eliminate GMOs in animal feed for its own brand products in the next 5 years",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.6 Genetic modification\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the performance of the main distributors in Spain in relation to the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the animal feed of their own-brand products.<br>\nWe are not referring to the distributors' fresh or packaged finished products, which by law must not contain GMOs. In this respect, statements such as \"No products of our brands contain genetically modified organisms (GMOs)\" are meaningless. What we evaluate is the animal feed of fresh products (meat, poultry, fish,...). Excluded from this section would be certified \"organic\" products, which by law should not be exposed to genetically modified feed.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company sets a goal to eliminate GMOs in animal feed for its own brand products in the next 5 years.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Objective of eliminating GMOs from own brand+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Objective_of_eliminating_GMOs_from_own_brand+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Objective_of_eliminating_GMOs_from_own_brand+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827946,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+100% certified coffee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_certified_coffee.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "100% certified coffee",
      "question": "The company sources certified sustainable agricultural coffee for 100% of its own brand products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.7 Cocoa, coffee and tea\"\"<br>\n With this metric, we aim to show and compare the performance of leading retailers in Spain in sourcing the so-called high-risk crops of cocoa, coffee and tea for their own brand.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to source coffee from certified sustainable agriculture for 100% of its own brand products.<br>\n<br>\nCertified sustainable agriculture is defined as agriculture with one of the main certifications in this field such as Rainforest Alliance, Fairtrade, UTZ, Global GAP or EU Organic Farming. <br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+100% certified coffee+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_certified_coffee+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_certified_coffee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827957,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+100% certified teas and infusions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_certified_teas_and_infusions.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "100% certified teas and infusions",
      "question": "The company sources certified sustainable agriculture infusions for 100% of its own brand products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.7 Cocoa, coffee and tea\"\"<br>\n With this metric, we aim to show and compare the performance of leading retailers in Spain in sourcing the so-called high-risk crops of cocoa, coffee and tea for their own brand.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to source tea and herbal teas from certified sustainable agriculture for 100% of its own-brand products.<br>\n<br>\nCertified sustainable agriculture is defined as agriculture with one of the main sustainable agriculture certifications such as Rainforest Alliance, Fairtrade, UTZ, Global GAP or EU Organic Farming. <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+100% certified teas and infusions+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_certified_teas_and_infusions+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_certified_teas_and_infusions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827968,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+100% certified cocoa",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_certified_cocoa.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "100% certified cocoa",
      "question": "The company sources cocoa from certified sustainable agriculture for 100% of its own brand products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.7 Cocoa, coffee and tea\"\"<br>\n With this metric, we aim to show and compare the performance of leading retailers in Spain in sourcing the so-called high-risk crops of cocoa, coffee and tea for their own brand.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company chooses to source cocoa from certified sustainable agriculture for 100% of its own-brand products.<br>\n<br>\nCertified sustainable agriculture means certified sustainable agriculture with one of the main sustainable agriculture certifications such as Rainforest Alliance, Fairtrade, Fairtrade CocoaProgram, UTZ, Global GAP or EU Organic Farming. <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+100% certified cocoa+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 22,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_certified_cocoa+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_certified_cocoa+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827979,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+50% certified coffee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_certified_coffee.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "50% certified coffee",
      "question": "The company sources certified sustainably grown coffee for at least 50% of its own brand products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.7 Cocoa, coffee and tea\"\"<br>\n With this metric, we aim to show and compare the performance of leading retailers in Spain in sourcing the so-called high-risk crops of cocoa, coffee and tea for their own brand.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to source coffee from certified sustainable agriculture for at least 50% of its own branded products.<br>\n<br>\nCertified sustainable agriculture means certified sustainable agriculture with one of the main sustainable agriculture certifications such as Rainforest Alliance, Fairtrade, UTZ, Global GAP or EU organic farming. <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+50% certified coffee+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_certified_coffee+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_certified_coffee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6827990,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+50% certified teas and infusions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_certified_teas_and_infusions.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "50% certified teas and infusions",
      "question": "The company sources certified sustainable agriculture tea and infusions for at least 50% of its own brand products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.7 Cocoa, coffee and tea\"\"<br>\n With this metric, we aim to show and compare the performance of leading retailers in Spain in sourcing the so-called high-risk crops of cocoa, coffee and tea for their own brand.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to source tea and herbal teas from certified sustainable agriculture for at least 50% of its own-brand products.<br>\n<br>\nCertified sustainable agriculture is defined as agriculture with one of the main sustainable agriculture certifications such as Rainforest Alliance, Fairtrade, UTZ, Global GAP or EU Organic Farming. <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+50% certified teas and infusions+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_certified_teas_and_infusions+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_certified_teas_and_infusions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828001,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+50% certified cocoa",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_certified_cocoa.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "50% certified cocoa",
      "question": "The company sources certified sustainably grown cocoa for at least 50% of its own brand products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.7 Cocoa, coffee and tea\"\"<br>\n With this metric, we aim to show and compare the performance of leading retailers in Spain in sourcing the so-called high-risk crops of cocoa, coffee and tea for their own brand.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to source cocoa from certified sustainable agriculture for at least 50% of its own-brand products.<br>\n<br>\nCertified sustainable agriculture means certified sustainable agriculture with one of the main sustainable agriculture certifications such as Rainforest Alliance, Fairtrade, Fairtrade CocoaProgram, UTZ, Global GAP or EU Organic Farming. <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Carbon Footprint Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+50% certified cocoa+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 22,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_certified_cocoa+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_certified_cocoa+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828012,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Support projects for local cocoa, coffee or tea producers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Support_projects_for_local_cocoa_coffee_or_tea_producers.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Support projects for local cocoa, coffee or tea producers",
      "question": "The company has participated in relevant projects to support local cocoa, tea or coffee producers",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.7 Cocoa, coffee and tea\"\"<br>\n With this metric, we aim to show and compare the performance of leading retailers in Spain in sourcing the so-called high-risk crops of cocoa, coffee and tea for their own brand.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it has participated in relevant projects to support local cocoa, tea or coffee producers.<br>\nWe value at least one project related to any of these 3 crops or another of those considered \"\" in danger \"\" (tropical fruits for example)<br>\n <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Environmental Report<br>\n- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Support projects for local cocoa, coffee or tea producers+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Support_projects_for_local_cocoa_coffee_or_tea_producers+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Support_projects_for_local_cocoa_coffee_or_tea_producers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828023,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Policy on Animal Welfare",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Policy_on_Animal_Welfare.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Policy on Animal Welfare",
      "question": "The company publishes a specific, comprehensive and updated Policy on Animal Welfare based on specific actions and objectives.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": "We will assign a\" \"YES\" \"when the company communicates a comprehensive and accessible policy on Animal Welfare in an individual document or within some of its reports, respecting the following terms:<br>\n<br>\nThe company must communicate a clearly differentiated and developed policy around Animal Welfare (BA) measures applied to the supply of its products of animal origin at least of its own brand.<br>\nThis must be based on concrete, quantifiable and temporary actions and objectives, beyond the minimum legal requirements in BA matters.<br>\n<br>\nWe value that this policy includes the adoption of BA certifications, a description of the importance of animal treatment in the livestock industry, recognition of the impact of the large-scale distribution sector in this matter, as well as the demands on its suppliers regarding:<br>\n<br>\n- Food<br>\n- Antibiotics<br>\n- Accommodation<br>\n- Physical and mental health<br>\n- Good deal<br>\n- Behavior<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Policy on Animal Welfare+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Policy_on_Animal_Welfare+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Policy_on_Animal_Welfare+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828034,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Animal welfare requirements for all products and species",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_requirements_for_all_products_and_species.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Animal welfare requirements for all products and species",
      "question": "The company establishes requirements on Animal Welfare for all species and fresh own brand products (meat, poultry, dairy products and eggs)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": "This metric is related to the previous question on\" \"Policy on Animal Welfare\" \", defines the scope of application of the requirements stipulated in said policy, which in this case must cover all species and fresh products of own brand of origin animal:<br>\n<br>\n- Eggs<br>\n- Milk and dairy products<br>\n- Birds<br>\n- Meat (mainly beef and pork)<br>\n- Rest of meats (rabbit, lamb, etc ..)<br>\n<br>\nThese requirements must reflect the company's commitment to good practices on animal treatment, based both on demands above the legal requirements for all its suppliers, at least those of its own brand, and on a minimum of responsibilities that guarantee the main standards and Animal Welfare protocols such as the EU Animal Welfare Quality project, the IRTA (Agri-Food Ecological Center, which in turn endorses the AENOR standards), the EOI, animal welfare guarantee schemes promoted by the sector, INTERPORC, ProVacuno , etc..:<br>\nThese responsibilities consist of ensuring an adequate (a):<br>\n<br>\n- Food<br>\n- Accommodation<br>\n- Physical and mental health<br>\n- Good deal<br>\n- Behavior<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to establish requirements on Animal Welfare for all species and fresh products of its own brand of animal origin (meat, poultry, dairy products and eggs).<br>\nThese requirements will have to be accompanied by elements that guarantee compliance with basic conditions of Animal Welfare: certification of animal welfare, audits by the company or third parties.<br>\nWe will not take into account a simple statement of general requirements on animal welfare.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Animal welfare requirements for all products and species+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_requirements_for_all_products_and_species+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_requirements_for_all_products_and_species+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828045,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Target of Animal Welfare requirements for all products and species in 2025",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Target_of_Animal_Welfare_requirements_for_all_products_and_species_in_2025.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Target of Animal Welfare requirements for all products and species in 2025",
      "question": "The company establishes or will establish before 2025 requirements on Animal Welfare to all species and fresh own-brand products (meat, poultry, dairy products and eggs)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": "This metric is related to the previous question on\" \"Policy on Animal Welfare\" \", it defines the scope and temporal objective of application of the requirements stipulated in said policy, which in this case must be total for all species and fresh products own brand of animal origin and within a period no later than 2025:<br>\n<br>\nThese requirements must reflect the company's commitment to good practices on animal treatment, based both on demands above the legal requirements for all its suppliers, at least those of its own brand, and on a minimum of responsibilities that guarantee the main standards and Animal Welfare protocols such as the EU Animal Welfare Quality project, the IRTA (Agri-Food Ecological Center, which in turn endorses the AENOR standards), the EOI, animal welfare guarantee schemes promoted by the sector, INTERPORC, ProVacuno , etc..:<br>\nThese responsibilities consist of ensuring an adequate (a):<br>\n<br>\n- Food<br>\n- Accommodation<br>\n- Physical and mental health<br>\n- Good deal<br>\n- Behavior<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to establish requirements on Animal Welfare to all species and fresh products of its own brand of animal origin (meat, poultry, dairy products and eggs)<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company establishes a goal for 2025 to establish requirements on Animal Welfare for all species and fresh products of its own brand of animal origin (meat, poultry, dairy products and eggs)<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Target of Animal Welfare requirements for all products and species in 2025+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 22,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Target_of_Animal_Welfare_requirements_for_all_products_and_species_in_2025+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Target_of_Animal_Welfare_requirements_for_all_products_and_species_in_2025+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828056,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Animal welfare requirements for 50% of the products and species",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_requirements_for_50_of_the_products_and_species.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Animal welfare requirements for 50% of the products and species",
      "question": "The company establishes requirements on Animal Welfare for more than 50% of its own brand fresh species and products (meat, poultry, dairy products and eggs)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": "This metric is related to the previous question on\" \"Policy on Animal Welfare\" \", it defines the scope of application of the requirements stipulated in said policy, which in this case must cover at least 50% of the species and fresh products of own brand of animal origin:<br>\n<br>\n- Eggs<br>\n- Milk and dairy products<br>\n- Birds<br>\n- Meat (mainly beef and pork)<br>\n- Rest of meats (rabbit, lamb, etc ..)<br>\n<br>\nThese requirements must reflect the company's commitment to good practices on animal treatment, based both on demands above the legal requirements for all its suppliers, at least those of its own brand, and on a minimum of responsibilities that guarantee the main standards and Animal Welfare protocols such as the EU Animal Welfare Quality project, the IRTA (Agri-Food Ecological Center, which in turn endorses the AENOR standards), the EOI, animal welfare guarantee schemes promoted by the sector, INTERPORC, ProVacuno , etc..:<br>\nThese responsibilities consist of ensuring an adequate (a):<br>\n<br>\n- Food<br>\n- Accommodation<br>\n- Physical and mental health<br>\n- Good deal<br>\n- Behavior<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to establish requirements on Animal Welfare for at least 50% of the species and fresh products of its own brand of animal origin (meat, poultry, dairy products and eggs).<br>\nThese requirements will have to be accompanied by elements that guarantee compliance with basic conditions of Animal Welfare: certification of animal welfare, audits by the company or third parties.<br>\nWe will not take into account a simple statement of general requirements on animal welfare.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Animal welfare requirements for 50% of the products and species+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_requirements_for_50_of_the_products_and_species+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_requirements_for_50_of_the_products_and_species+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828067,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Animal welfare requirements in some products and species",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_requirements_in_some_products_and_species.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Animal welfare requirements in some products and species",
      "question": "The company establishes requirements on Animal Welfare for some of its own brand fresh products (meat, poultry, dairy products and eggs)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": "This metric is related to the previous question on\" \"Policy on Animal Welfare\" \", it defines the scope of application of the requirements stipulated in said policy, which in this case must cover at least some of the species and fresh brand products own of animal origin:<br>\n<br>\n- Eggs<br>\n- Milk and dairy products<br>\n- Birds<br>\n- Meat (mainly beef and pork)<br>\n- Rest of meats (rabbit, lamb, etc ..)<br>\n<br>\nThese requirements must reflect the company's commitment to good practices on animal treatment, based both on demands above the legal requirements for all its suppliers, at least those of its own brand, and on a minimum of responsibilities that guarantee the main standards and Animal Welfare protocols such as the EU Animal Welfare Quality project, the IRTA (Agri-Food Ecological Center, which in turn endorses the AENOR standards), the EOI, animal welfare guarantee schemes promoted by the sector, INTERPORC, ProVacuno , etc..:<br>\nThese responsibilities consist of ensuring an adequate (a):<br>\n<br>\n- Food<br>\n- Accommodation<br>\n- Physical and mental health<br>\n- Good deal<br>\n- Behavior<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"\" YES \"\" to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to establish requirements on Animal Welfare to at least some of the species and fresh products of its own brand of animal origin (meat, poultry, dairy products and eggs).<br>\n<br>\n- The requirements on Animal Welfare apply to a whole range of products (more than 5 references) or the entire species (beef, chicken, pork, milk, etc.)<br>\nEggs are considered in another metric<br>\n<br>\nIn the case of multinational groups with a significant presence in other countries (Auchan, Carrefour, Aldi, Lidl) an SI will be assigned only if this requirement is applicable in Spain.<br>\n<br>\nThese requirements will have to be accompanied by elements that guarantee compliance with basic conditions of Animal Welfare: certification of animal welfare, audits by the company or third parties.<br>\nWe will not take into account a simple statement of general requirements on animal welfare.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Animal welfare requirements in some products and species+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_requirements_in_some_products_and_species+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_requirements_in_some_products_and_species+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828078,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Responsible use of antibiotics",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Responsible_use_of_antibiotics.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Responsible use of antibiotics",
      "question": "The company establishes requirements on the responsible use of antibiotics for its own-brand suppliers",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The responsibility of companies for the welfare of animals must also cover the field of antibiotics that are administered to them when they fall ill and help prevent the growth of resistance to these drugs, whose excessive use is causing the proliferation of bacteria and microbes .<br>\n<br>\nMore than 400,000 people die each year from foodborne illness, mostly from microbes or bacteria that, if they become resistant to antibiotics, cannot be treated.<br>\n<br>\nIn many farms today, drugs are used in animals that live crowded and stressed in small spaces in order to avoid infections and increase productivity.<br>\n<br>\nThe reduction in the use of antibiotics in the livestock and aquaculture industry involves improving the living conditions of these animals by reducing their stress and their relationship with humans.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to establish responsible antibiotic use requirements for its own brand suppliers (at least for one animal species).<br>\n<br>\nThe following are some good practices in the sector in this respect: <br>\n<br>\n- Adherence of livestock and aquaculture farms of feed suppliers to the commitments officially published in the National Antibiotic Resistance Plan. <br>\n- Establishment of preventive measures to reduce the use of antibiotics for the treatment of infectious diseases. <br>\n- Encourage antibiotic reduction programmes during the rearing of animals for human consumption.<br>\n- Plan for the elimination and reduction of antibiotics in own-brand products of animal origin. <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy <br>\n- Responsible Purchasing Policy<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Responsible use of antibiotics+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Responsible_use_of_antibiotics+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Responsible_use_of_antibiotics+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828089,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Animal welfare policies for all non-food products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_policies_for_all_non_food_products.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Animal welfare policies for all non-food products",
      "question": "The company establishes an Animal Welfare policy for all its own brand cosmetics, textiles and footwear.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to establish a policy on Animal Welfare for all its own-brand cosmetics, textiles and footwear.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company declares to include in its Animal Welfare Purchasing Policy requirements for its suppliers of non-food products. <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy <br>\n- Responsible Purchasing Policy<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Animal welfare policies for all non-food products+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_policies_for_all_non_food_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_policies_for_all_non_food_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828100,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Animal welfare policies for some non-food products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_policies_for_some_non_food_products.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Animal welfare policies for some non-food products",
      "question": "The company establishes an Animal Welfare policy for most of its own-brand cosmetics, textiles and footwear.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to have an Animal Welfare policy in place for some of its own branded cosmetics, textiles and footwear (at least one whole range or 3 product categories).<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company declares to have an Animal Welfare policy for all of its own branded cosmetics, textiles and footwear.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company declares to include in its Animal Welfare Purchasing Policy requirements for its suppliers of non-food products. <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy <br>\n- Responsible Purchasing Policy<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Animal welfare policies for some non-food products+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_policies_for_some_non_food_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_policies_for_some_non_food_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828111,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Elimination of \"cage eggs\"",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_cage_eggs.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Elimination of \"cage eggs\"",
      "question": "The company does not sell eggs from caged hens (category 3) of any brand",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "At present, seven out of ten Spanish households prefer to consume eggs from free-range chickens, according to a survey carried out by Lidl, a chain that already markets this type of product and is the first to do so.<br>\nThere are currently four types of eggs on the market, which are determined by numbers (0,1,2 and 3) that head the codes that we find in all of them and give us information about the breeding and feeding of the hen. The 0 eggs are from organic production; the 1 come from free-range hens, raised in freedom; the 2 of so-called floor hens, raised in chicken coops or sheds, and the 3 of hens raised in cages.<br>\n<br>\nAs the NGO Animal Equality emphasizes, \"\" �cage-free� does not imply �abuse-free�, but it undoubtedly improves the quality of life of animals and significantly reduces their suffering. \"<br>\n<br>\nDespite the fact that the production of eggs free of caged gallians has gone from 7% in 2017 to 23% in 2020, according to this same organization the industry in Spain continues to be at the bottom of the European Union since it is the country with the highest number of caged animals. In Europe 53% of hens live in cages, a small figure compared to 77% that remain confined in Spain.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it does not market eggs from caged hens (category 3) of any brand. This includes its own branded eggs as well as all other brands.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares not to market caged hen eggs (category 3) only own brand eggs.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy <br>\n- Responsible Purchasing Policy<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Elimination of \"cage eggs\"+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_cage_eggs+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_cage_eggs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828122,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Goal of elimination of \"cage eggs\" in 2025",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Goal_of_elimination_of_cage_eggs_in_2025.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Goal of elimination of \"cage eggs\" in 2025",
      "question": "The company does not market cage eggs of any brand or sets a goal to stop doing so before the end of 2025",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "At present, seven out of ten Spanish households prefer to consume eggs from free-range chickens, according to a survey carried out by Lidl, a chain that already markets this type of product and is the first to do so.<br>\nThere are currently four types of eggs on the market, which are determined by numbers (0,1,2 and 3) that head the codes that we find in all of them and give us information about the breeding and feeding of the hen. The 0 eggs are from organic production; the 1 come from free-range hens, raised in freedom; the 2 of so-called floor hens, raised in chicken coops or sheds, and the 3 of hens raised in cages.<br>\n<br>\nAs the NGO Animal Equality emphasizes, \"\" �cage-free� does not imply �abuse-free�, but it undoubtedly improves the quality of life of animals and significantly reduces their suffering. \"<br>\n<br>\nDespite the fact that the production of eggs free of caged gallians has gone from 7% in 2017 to 23% in 2020, according to this same organization the industry in Spain continues to be at the bottom of the European Union since it is the country with the highest number of caged animals. In Europe 53% of hens live in cages, a small figure compared to 77% that remain confined in Spain.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company sets a target to stop marketing eggs from caged hens of any brand by 2025.<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company does not market any branded eggs from caged hens. <br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company sets a target to stop marketing eggs from caged hens of any brand by 2025 or later.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy <br>\n- Responsible Purchasing Policy<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Goal of elimination of \"cage eggs\" in 2025+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Goal_of_elimination_of_cage_eggs_in_2025+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Goal_of_elimination_of_cage_eggs_in_2025+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828133,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Elimination of own brand \"cage eggs\"",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_own_brand_cage_eggs.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Elimination of own brand \"cage eggs\"",
      "question": "The company does not sell own brand cage eggs (category 3)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "At present, seven out of ten Spanish households prefer to consume eggs from free-range chickens, according to a survey carried out by Lidl, a chain that already markets this type of product and is the first to do so.<br>\nThere are currently four types of eggs on the market, which are determined by numbers (0,1,2 and 3) that head the codes that we find in all of them and give us information about the breeding and feeding of the hen. The 0 eggs are from organic production; the 1 come from free-range hens, raised in freedom; the 2 of so-called floor hens, raised in chicken coops or sheds, and the 3 of hens raised in cages.<br>\n<br>\nAs the NGO Animal Equality emphasizes, \"\" �cage-free� does not imply �abuse-free�, but it undoubtedly improves the quality of life of animals and significantly reduces their suffering. \"<br>\n<br>\nDespite the fact that the production of eggs free of caged gallians has gone from 7% in 2017 to 23% in 2020, according to this same organization the industry in Spain continues to be at the bottom of the European Union since it is the country with the highest number of caged animals. In Europe 53% of hens live in cages, a small figure compared to 77% that remain confined in Spain.",
      "methodology": "We will assign a \"\"YES\"\" to this question if :<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it does not market own-brand eggs from caged hens (category 3). <br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy <br>\n- Responsible Purchasing Policy<br>\n- Annual Report<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Elimination of own brand \"cage eggs\"+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_own_brand_cage_eggs+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_own_brand_cage_eggs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828144,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Elimination of own brand \"cage eggs\" in 2023",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_own_brand_cage_eggs_in_2023.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Elimination of own brand \"cage eggs\" in 2023",
      "question": "The company sets a goal of not selling cage eggs by 2023",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "At present, seven out of ten Spanish households prefer to consume eggs from free-range chickens, according to a survey carried out by Lidl, a chain that already markets this type of product and is the first to do so.<br>\nThere are currently four types of eggs on the market, which are determined by numbers (0,1,2 and 3) that head the codes that we find in all of them and give us information about the breeding and feeding of the hen. The 0 eggs are from organic production; the 1 come from free-range hens, raised in freedom; the 2 of so-called floor hens, raised in chicken coops or sheds, and the 3 of hens raised in cages.<br>\n<br>\nAs the NGO Animal Equality emphasizes, \"\" �cage-free� does not imply �abuse-free�, but it undoubtedly improves the quality of life of animals and significantly reduces their suffering. \"<br>\n<br>\nDespite the fact that the production of eggs free of caged gallians has gone from 7% in 2017 to 23% in 2020, according to this same organization the industry in Spain continues to be at the bottom of the European Union since it is the country with the highest number of caged animals. In Europe 53% of hens live in cages, a small figure compared to 77% that remain confined in Spain.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company sets a goal to stop marketing its own brand cage eggs by 2023<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company does not sell its own brand caged eggs.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company establishes a goal to stop marketing its own brand caged hen eggs with a term greater than 2023<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Elimination of own brand \"cage eggs\" in 2023+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_own_brand_cage_eggs_in_2023+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_own_brand_cage_eggs_in_2023+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828155,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Ingredients of private label products without cage eggs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Ingredients_of_private_label_products_without_cage_eggs.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Ingredients of private label products without cage eggs",
      "question": "The company does not use cage eggs (category 3) in ingredients of private label products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "At present, seven out of ten Spanish households prefer to consume eggs from free-range chickens, according to a survey carried out by Lidl, a chain that already markets this type of product and is the first to do so.<br>\nThere are currently four types of eggs on the market, which are determined by numbers (0,1,2 and 3) that head the codes that we find in all of them and give us information about the breeding and feeding of the hen. The 0 eggs are from organic production; the 1 come from free-range hens, raised in freedom; the 2 of so-called floor hens, raised in chicken coops or sheds, and the 3 of hens raised in cages.<br>\n<br>\nAs the NGO Animal Equality emphasizes, \"\" �cage-free� does not imply �abuse-free�, but it undoubtedly improves the quality of life of animals and significantly reduces their suffering. \"<br>\n<br>\nDespite the fact that the production of eggs free of caged gallians has gone from 7% in 2017 to 23% in 2020, according to this same organization the industry in Spain continues to be at the bottom of the European Union since it is the country with the highest number of caged animals. In Europe 53% of hens live in cages, a small figure compared to 77% that remain confined in Spain.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it does not use caged chicken eggs (category 3) in ingredients of its own brand products.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Ingredients of private label products without cage eggs+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Ingredients_of_private_label_products_without_cage_eggs+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Ingredients_of_private_label_products_without_cage_eggs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828166,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Ingredients of private label products without cage eggs in 2025",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Ingredients_of_private_label_products_without_cage_eggs_in_2025.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Ingredients of private label products without cage eggs in 2025",
      "question": "The company sets a goal of not using cage eggs (category 3) in ingredients of private label products by 2025.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "At present, seven out of ten Spanish households prefer to consume eggs from free-range chickens, according to a survey carried out by Lidl, a chain that already markets this type of product and is the first to do so.<br>\nThere are currently four types of eggs on the market, which are determined by numbers (0,1,2 and 3) that head the codes that we find in all of them and give us information about the breeding and feeding of the hen. The 0 eggs are from organic production; the 1 come from free-range hens, raised in freedom; the 2 of so-called floor hens, raised in chicken coops or sheds, and the 3 of hens raised in cages.<br>\n<br>\nAs the NGO Animal Equality emphasizes, \"\" �cage-free� does not imply �abuse-free�, but it undoubtedly improves the quality of life of animals and significantly reduces their suffering. \"<br>\n<br>\nDespite the fact that the production of eggs free of caged gallians has gone from 7% in 2017 to 23% in 2020, according to this same organization the industry in Spain continues to be at the bottom of the European Union since it is the country with the highest number of caged animals. In Europe 53% of hens live in cages, a small figure compared to 77% that remain confined in Spain.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company sets a goal of not using cage eggs (category 3) in ingredients of private label products by 2025. Or:<br>\n- The company declares that it does not use caged chicken eggs (category 3) in ingredients of its own brand products.<br>\n<br>\nWe will assign a \"NO\" if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company establishes a goal of not using caged chicken eggs (category 3) in ingredients of its own brand products with a term greater than 2025<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Ingredients of private label products without cage eggs in 2025+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Ingredients_of_private_label_products_without_cage_eggs_in_2025+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Ingredients_of_private_label_products_without_cage_eggs_in_2025+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828177,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Control to avoid premature death of male chickens",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Control_to_avoid_premature_death_of_male_chickens.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Control to avoid premature death of male chickens",
      "question": "The company claims to control its supply chain to prevent premature death of male chickens in private label eggs.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The industry raises two types of birds: layers, which lay eggs, and broilers, raised to be killed and eaten.<br>\nIf a male chick is born in the egg-laying industry, it is useless and will likely be thrown into some sort of grinder as soon as it hatches and its gender is identified.<br>\nAt the same time they are considered unsuitable for fattening because they take longer to gain weight and are not the size of a chicken of the type used for slaughter.<br>\nThe killing and elimination of male chicks shortly after hatching is a common practice in food production throughout the world. The mechanical maceration method, a kind of crushing, is the most widely adopted.<br>\nThe topic is taboo in the industry because there is still no solution that can be adopted on a large scale. According to many veterinarians \"\" an animal is being sentenced to death because it was born with the wrong sex \"\".<br>\n<br>\nIn France, they agreed to ban the practice of squashing unwanted male chicks by the end of 2021, as part of animal welfare reforms. However, the alternatives are still being discussed.<br>\n<br>\nIn Germany, a court ruled that the practice can continue temporarily as long as a viable alternative is found. Last year in Switzerland shredding was banned.<br>\n<br>\nControl teams in Germany and the Netherlands developed a technology that makes it possible to identify the sex of a chicken in the early stages of incubation, which lasts 21 days.<br>\nThus, males can be discarded before hatching.<br>\nA German company, Selectegg, sells eggs using this technology in supermarket chains in France and Germany. They are called \"\" respecteggs \"\".",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to control its supply chain to avoid premature death of male chickens in its own brand eggs.<br>\nIn the case of multinational companies, we value that this practice is carried out in at least one country, even if it is not Spain.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Control to avoid premature death of male chickens+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Control_to_avoid_premature_death_of_male_chickens+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Control_to_avoid_premature_death_of_male_chickens+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828188,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Campaigns to moderate meat consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Campaigns_to_moderate_meat_consumption.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Campaigns to moderate meat consumption",
      "question": "The company encourages the moderation of meat and chicken consumption with consumer awareness campaigns.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric coincides with\" \"Fostering the reduction of intensive livestock consumption\" \"within the metric 5.1 Protection of biodiversity and management of the impacts of the activity.<br>\nBoth are focused on encouraging food distributors to encourage a moderation of meat consumption, but while the latter does so from an environmental perspective, the former does so from the point of view of animal treatment.<br>\n<br>\nThe most sustainable solution in this regard is to get the EU to reduce its consumption of meat and dairy products. This must be achieved through political instruments, including a radical reform of the CAP to prevent factory farms and meat producers from being subsidized and to redirect subsidies towards a diet model based on plant-based products and organic livestock.<br>\nIn this, supermarkets have an essential role as the main buyers and distributors",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to encourage the moderation of the consumption of meat and / or chicken with awareness campaigns for consumers.<br>\n<br>\nSo far, after 8 companies evaluated in the supermarket sector, we have not found any initiative in this regard that we can include here as an example of good practice.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Campaigns to moderate meat consumption+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Campaigns_to_moderate_meat_consumption+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Campaigns_to_moderate_meat_consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828199,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Own range of organic products of animal origin",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Own_range_of_organic_products_of_animal_origin.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Own range of organic products of animal origin",
      "question": "The company offers ranges of private label bio products of animal origin (meat, poultry, eggs, dairy).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company offers ranges of bio products of animal origin of its own brand (meat, poultry, eggs, dairy).<br>\nAt least 2 species between meat, poultry, pork, eggs<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)<br>\n<br>\nIf the company does not publish this information in its reports, check its assortment in its online store, in a physical store, on the Openfoodfact platform (https://es.openfoodfacts.org/) or simply by calling Customer Service.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Own range of organic products of animal origin+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Own_range_of_organic_products_of_animal_origin+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Own_range_of_organic_products_of_animal_origin+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828210,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Own range of vegetarian or vegan products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Own_range_of_vegetarian_or_vegan_products.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Own range of vegetarian or vegan products",
      "question": "The company offers ranges of private label vegetarian / vegan products as alternatives to products of animal origin.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company offers ranges of own brand vegetarian / vegan products as alternatives to products of animal origin.<br>\nAt least 1 vegan alternative to beef burger, sausage, chicken, etc.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)<br>\n<br>\nIf the company does not publish this information in its reports, check its assortment in its online store, in a physical store, on the Openfoodfact platform (https://es.openfoodfacts.org/) or simply by calling Customer Service.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Own range of vegetarian or vegan products+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Own_range_of_vegetarian_or_vegan_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Own_range_of_vegetarian_or_vegan_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828221,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Promotion of Animal Welfare",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_Animal_Welfare.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Promotion of Animal Welfare",
      "question": "The company has carried out specific promotional actions on Animal Welfare in the last year.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it has carried out specific promotional actions on Animal Welfare in the last year (online content, dissemination in networks, support for third-party campaigns, workshops, seminars, etc.)<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Promotion of Animal Welfare+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_Animal_Welfare+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_Animal_Welfare+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828232,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+All products with Animal Welfare certification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+All_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "All products with Animal Welfare certification",
      "question": "The company offers animal welfare certifications for all its species and own brand products of animal origin.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "We start from the basis that at least companies comply with current legislation on animal welfare. In this sense and taking into account the lack of transparency and rigor in relation to the fulfillment of certain requirements by the food industry and inspections in this regard, we demand that companies go beyond the minimum in their animal treatment practices. legal and certify their performance through certifications.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it offers animal welfare certifications for all its species and its own brand products of animal origin.<br>\n<br>\nProducts with some type of certification must be: meat (at least beef and pork), poultry (at least chicken), dairy (at least UHT / fresh milk and eggs.<br>\nWe consider any of the following reference certifications in Animal Welfare:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare certified Welfare by AENOR. This independent certification, which follows the Welfare Quality protocol, is approved by the Institute for Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA).<br>\n<br>\n- Interporc Animal Welfare Spain (IAWS). Created by the Organizaci�n Interprofesional Agroalimentaria del Porcino de Capa Blanca (Interporc), this regulation endorses good practices in all links of the value chain of this type of pig.<br>\n<br>\n- GO. The seal of the National Association for the Defense of Animals certifies the eggs of free-range and organic hens whose living and production conditions go beyond the minimums set by the legislation on animal welfare.<br>\n<br>\n- Ecological certifications according to the European Regulation of Ecological Agricultural Production<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+All products with Animal Welfare certification+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+All_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+All_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828243,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Most products with Animal Welfare certification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Most_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Most products with Animal Welfare certification",
      "question": "The company offers animal welfare certifications for most species of its own brand products of animal origin.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "We start from the basis that at least companies comply with current legislation on animal welfare. In this sense and taking into account the lack of transparency and rigor in relation to the fulfillment of certain requirements by the food industry and inspections in this regard, we demand that companies go beyond the minimum in their animal treatment practices. legal and certify their performance through certifications.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it offers animal welfare certifications for most species of its own brand products of animal origin.<br>\n<br>\nProducts with some type of certification must include at least 3 of the 4 following groups: meat (at least beef and pork), poultry (at least chicken), dairy (at least UHT / fresh milk and eggs.<br>\nHere we refer to the animal species of the product, not the references. For the same species, chicken for example, the company can offer a set of many products and references (type of cut, weight, piece, etc.)<br>\nWe consider any of the following reference certifications in Animal Welfare:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare certified Welfare by AENOR. This independent certification, which follows the Welfare Quality protocol, is approved by the Institute for Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA).<br>\n<br>\n- Interporc Animal Welfare Spain (IAWS). Created by the Organizaci�n Interprofesional Agroalimentaria del Porcino de Capa Blanca (Interporc), this regulation endorses good practices in all links of the value chain of this type of pig.<br>\n<br>\n- GO. The seal of the National Association for the Defense of Animals certifies the eggs of free-range and organic hens whose living and production conditions go beyond the minimums set by the legislation on animal welfare.<br>\n<br>\n- Ecological certifications according to the European Regulation of Ecological Agricultural Production<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Most products with Animal Welfare certification+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Most_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Most_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828254,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Relevant number of products with Animal Welfare certification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Relevant_number_of_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Relevant number of products with Animal Welfare certification",
      "question": "The company offers animal welfare certifications on a significant number of its own brand products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "We start from the basis that at least companies comply with current legislation on animal welfare. In this sense and taking into account the lack of transparency and rigor in relation to the fulfillment of certain requirements by the food industry and inspections in this regard, we demand that companies go beyond the minimum in their animal treatment practices. legal and certify their performance through certifications.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company offers animal welfare certifications in a significant number of its own brand products<br>\n<br>\nProducts with some type of certification must be at least 2 of the following 4 groups: meat (at least beef and pork), poultry (at least chicken), dairy (at least UHT / fresh milk and eggs.<br>\n<br>\n- The company has specific and differentiated lines or ranges of products with Animal Welfare certification that include at least 5 references of at least one species (beef, pork, chicken, turkey, etc.) or category (milk, dairy, eggs, etc. ..). Example Eroski Natur, Alcampo Controlled Production.<br>\nIt is not necessary for the certification to include 100% of the own brand species (meat, pork, chicken, ...) or category (milk, eggs, ..)<br>\n<br>\nWe consider any of the following reference certifications in Animal Welfare:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare certified Welfare by AENOR. This independent certification, which follows the Welfare Quality protocol, is approved by the Institute for Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA).<br>\n<br>\n- Interporc Animal Welfare Spain (IAWS). Created by the Organizaci�n Interprofesional Agroalimentaria del Porcino de Capa Blanca (Interporc), this regulation endorses good practices in all links of the value chain of this type of pig.<br>\n<br>\n- GO. The seal of the National Association for the Defense of Animals certifies the eggs of free-range and organic hens whose living and production conditions go beyond the minimums set by the legislation on animal welfare.<br>\n<br>\n- Ecological certifications according to the European Regulation of Ecological Agricultural Production<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Relevant number of products with Animal Welfare certification+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Relevant_number_of_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Relevant_number_of_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828265,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Some products with Animal Welfare certification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Some_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Some products with Animal Welfare certification",
      "question": "The company offers at least some products with animal welfare certification.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "We start from the basis that at least companies comply with current legislation on animal welfare. In this sense and taking into account the lack of transparency and rigor in relation to the fulfillment of certain requirements by the food industry and inspections in this regard, we demand that companies go beyond the minimum in their animal treatment practices. legal and certify their performance through certifications.",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company offers at least some products with animal welfare certification<br>\n<br>\nThe company must market at least some references (more than 5 EAN codes) of its own brand products with Animal Welfare certification without the need for the certification to cover the entire animal species or category (meat, poultry, milk, eggs, etc. ...) or that is identified with a specific range or line of products. Auchan example for your APC organic veal and gourmet cooked ham.<br>\n<br>\nWe consider any of the following reference certifications in Animal Welfare:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare certified Welfare by AENOR. This independent certification, which follows the Welfare Quality protocol, is approved by the Institute for Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA).<br>\n<br>\n- Interporc Animal Welfare Spain (IAWS). Created by the Organizaci�n Interprofesional Agroalimentaria del Porcino de Capa Blanca (Interporc), this regulation endorses good practices in all links of the value chain of this type of pig.<br>\n<br>\n- GO. The seal of the National Association for the Defense of Animals certifies the eggs of free-range and organic hens whose living and production conditions go beyond the minimums set by the legislation on animal welfare.<br>\n<br>\n- Ecological certifications according to the European Regulation of Ecological Agricultural Production<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Some products with Animal Welfare certification+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Some_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Some_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828276,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Audit on Animal Welfare to Suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Audit_on_Animal_Welfare_to_Suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Audit on Animal Welfare to Suppliers",
      "question": "The company conducts audits and inspections of its main suppliers on the conditions of the animals of all its products (meat, poultry, milk, eggs).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.3 Animal welfare in the supply chain \"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the efforts of the main distributors in Spain in applying their animal welfare policy to their supply chain, focusing mainly on :<br>\n<br>\n- carrying out audits and inspections of major suppliers<br>\n- support and training of suppliers on animal welfare<br>\n- animal welfare requirements for non-branded suppliers",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to carry out audits or inspections to its main suppliers on the conditions of the animals of some of its products<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company declares that it offers animal welfare certifications for all its species and its own brand products of animal origin.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Audit on Animal Welfare to Suppliers+Luis Leyton"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Audit_on_Animal_Welfare_to_Suppliers+Luis_Leyton.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Audit_on_Animal_Welfare_to_Suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828287,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Demands on Animal Welfare to non private label suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Demands_on_Animal_Welfare_to_non_private_label_suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Demands on Animal Welfare to non private label suppliers",
      "question": "The company requires its suppliers Animal Welfare policies for all non-private label products.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.3 Animal welfare in the supply chain \"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the efforts of the main distributors in Spain in applying their animal welfare policy to their supply chain, focusing mainly on :<br>\n<br>\n- carrying out audits and inspections of major suppliers<br>\n- support and training of suppliers on animal welfare<br>\n- animal welfare requirements for non-branded suppliers",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares that it requires its suppliers Animal Welfare policies for any non-own brand products<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Demands on Animal Welfare to non private label suppliers+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Demands_on_Animal_Welfare_to_non_private_label_suppliers+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Demands_on_Animal_Welfare_to_non_private_label_suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6828298,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Support and training on Animal Welfare for suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Support_and_training_on_Animal_Welfare_for_suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Support and training on Animal Welfare for suppliers",
      "question": "The company provides support, awareness and training to its suppliers on animal welfare.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.3 Animal welfare in the supply chain \"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the efforts of the main distributors in Spain in applying their animal welfare policy to their supply chain, focusing mainly on :<br>\n<br>\n- carrying out audits and inspections of major suppliers<br>\n- support and training of suppliers on animal welfare<br>\n- animal welfare requirements for non-branded suppliers",
      "methodology": "We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:<br>\n<br>\n- The company declares to provide support or training to its suppliers on animal welfare<br>\nOr:<br>\n- The company declares that it offers animal welfare certifications for all its species and its own brand products of animal origin.<br>\n<br>\nThis information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:<br>\n<br>\n- Animal Welfare Policy<br>\n- Responsible purchasing policy<br>\n- Annual memory<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>\n- Sustainability Report<br>\n- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Support and training on Animal Welfare for suppliers+Research Group Eticonsum"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Support_and_training_on_Animal_Welfare_for_suppliers+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Support_and_training_on_Animal_Welfare_for_suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6830976,
      "name": "Ayesha Tareen+Hazardous Waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Ayesha_Tareen+Hazardous_Waste.json",
      "designer": "Ayesha Tareen",
      "title": "Hazardous Waste",
      "question": "What is the total amount of hazardous waste created by the organization?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "metric tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Ayesha_Tareen+Hazardous_Waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6833433,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions publication exhaustively and disaggregated+Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication_exhaustively_and_disaggregated+Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Scope 3 emissions publication exhaustively and disaggregated",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 3\"\"<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication_exhaustively_and_disaggregated+Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862330,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions publication exhaustively and disaggregated+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication_exhaustively_and_disaggregated+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Scope 3 emissions publication exhaustively and disaggregated",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 3\"\"<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_3_Indirect_GHG_Emissions_Scope_3.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication_exhaustively_and_disaggregated+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862342,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Scope 3 emission reduction objective+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emission_reduction_objective+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Scope 3 emission reduction objective",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 3\"\"<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_3_Indirect_GHG_Emissions_Scope_3.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emission_reduction_objective+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862350,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Measures to reduce scope 3 emissions+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_scope_3_emissions+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Measures to reduce scope 3 emissions",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 3\"\"<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_3_Indirect_GHG_Emissions_Scope_3.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_reduce_scope_3_emissions+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862358,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions publication+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Scope 3 emissions publication",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 3\"\"<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_3_Indirect_GHG_Emissions_Scope_3.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862366,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Small supermarket (< 1000m2)+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Small_supermarket_1000m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Small supermarket (< 1000m2)",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 3\"\"<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_3_Indirect_GHG_Emissions_Scope_3.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Small_supermarket_1000m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862374,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Small or medium supermarket (< 2500m2)+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Small_or_medium_supermarket_2500m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Small or medium supermarket (< 2500m2)",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 3\"\"<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_3_Indirect_GHG_Emissions_Scope_3.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Small_or_medium_supermarket_2500m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862382,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Carbon neutral or net zero emissions+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Carbon_neutral_or_net_zero_emissions+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Carbon neutral or net zero emissions",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.4 GHG emissions intensity\"\"<br>\nGHG emissions intensity is a key indicator when monitoring the real relative impact of a company's carbon footprint. We therefore value companies including this indicator in their reporting, albeit with different denominators to the one we have chosen. <br>\nThe measure we have selected to assess the intensity of GHG emissions in the retail sector in a homogeneous way is TnCO2eq per m2.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_4_GHG_emissions_intensity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Carbon_neutral_or_net_zero_emissions+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862394,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Intensity of GHG emissions <150 kg of CO2-eq per m2+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Intensity_of_GHG_emissions_150_kg_of_CO2_eq_per_m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Intensity of GHG emissions <150 kg of CO2-eq per m2",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.4 GHG emissions intensity\"\"<br>\nGHG emissions intensity is a key indicator when monitoring the real relative impact of a company's carbon footprint. We therefore value companies including this indicator in their reporting, albeit with different denominators to the one we have chosen. <br>\nThe measure we have selected to assess the intensity of GHG emissions in the retail sector in a homogeneous way is TnCO2eq per m2.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_4_GHG_emissions_intensity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Intensity_of_GHG_emissions_150_kg_of_CO2_eq_per_m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862402,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Intensity of GHG emissions <350 kg of CO2-eq per m2+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Intensity_of_GHG_emissions_350_kg_of_CO2_eq_per_m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Intensity of GHG emissions <350 kg of CO2-eq per m2",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.4 GHG emissions intensity\"\"<br>\nGHG emissions intensity is a key indicator when monitoring the real relative impact of a company's carbon footprint. We therefore value companies including this indicator in their reporting, albeit with different denominators to the one we have chosen. <br>\nThe measure we have selected to assess the intensity of GHG emissions in the retail sector in a homogeneous way is TnCO2eq per m2.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_4_GHG_emissions_intensity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Intensity_of_GHG_emissions_350_kg_of_CO2_eq_per_m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862410,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Intensity of GHG emissions <500 kg of CO2-eq per m2+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Intensity_of_GHG_emissions_500_kg_of_CO2_eq_per_m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Intensity of GHG emissions <500 kg of CO2-eq per m2",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.4 GHG emissions intensity\"\"<br>\nGHG emissions intensity is a key indicator when monitoring the real relative impact of a company's carbon footprint. We therefore value companies including this indicator in their reporting, albeit with different denominators to the one we have chosen. <br>\nThe measure we have selected to assess the intensity of GHG emissions in the retail sector in a homogeneous way is TnCO2eq per m2.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_4_GHG_emissions_intensity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Intensity_of_GHG_emissions_500_kg_of_CO2_eq_per_m2+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862418,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the intensity of GHG emissions+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_intensity_of_GHG_emissions+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the intensity of GHG emissions",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.4 GHG emissions intensity\"\"<br>\nGHG emissions intensity is a key indicator when monitoring the real relative impact of a company's carbon footprint. We therefore value companies including this indicator in their reporting, albeit with different denominators to the one we have chosen. <br>\nThe measure we have selected to assess the intensity of GHG emissions in the retail sector in a homogeneous way is TnCO2eq per m2.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_4_GHG_emissions_intensity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_intensity_of_GHG_emissions+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862426,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of the intensity of GHG emissions by 10%+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_the_intensity_of_GHG_emissions_by_10+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of the intensity of GHG emissions by 10%",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.4 GHG emissions intensity\"\"<br>\nGHG emissions intensity is a key indicator when monitoring the real relative impact of a company's carbon footprint. We therefore value companies including this indicator in their reporting, albeit with different denominators to the one we have chosen. <br>\nThe measure we have selected to assess the intensity of GHG emissions in the retail sector in a homogeneous way is TnCO2eq per m2.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_4_GHG_emissions_intensity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_the_intensity_of_GHG_emissions_by_10+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862434,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of GHG emissions by 60%+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_60+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of GHG emissions by 60%",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.5 Reduction of GHG emissions \"\"<br>\n With this metric, based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) \"Content 305-5 GHG Emissions Reduction\", we aim to assess the performance of companies in reducing their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_5_Reduction_of_GHG_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_60+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862446,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of GHG emissions by 30%+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_30+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of GHG emissions by 30%",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.5 Reduction of GHG emissions \"\"<br>\n With this metric, based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) \"Content 305-5 GHG Emissions Reduction\", we aim to assess the performance of companies in reducing their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_5_Reduction_of_GHG_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_30+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862454,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of GHG emissions by 10%+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_10+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of GHG emissions by 10%",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.5 Reduction of GHG emissions \"\"<br>\n With this metric, based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) \"Content 305-5 GHG Emissions Reduction\", we aim to assess the performance of companies in reducing their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_5_Reduction_of_GHG_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_10+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862462,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of historical data on GHG emissions+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_historical_data_on_GHG_emissions+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of historical data on GHG emissions",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.5 Reduction of GHG emissions \"\"<br>\n With this metric, based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) \"Content 305-5 GHG Emissions Reduction\", we aim to assess the performance of companies in reducing their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_5_Reduction_of_GHG_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_historical_data_on_GHG_emissions+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862470,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of GHG emissions by 5%+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_5+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of GHG emissions by 5%",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.5 Reduction of GHG emissions \"\"<br>\n With this metric, based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) \"Content 305-5 GHG Emissions Reduction\", we aim to assess the performance of companies in reducing their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_5_Reduction_of_GHG_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_GHG_emissions_by_5+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862478,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions reduction or compensation vs. last year+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_reduction_or_compensation_vs_last_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Scope 3 emissions reduction or compensation vs. last year",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.5 Reduction of GHG emissions \"\"<br>\n With this metric, based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) \"Content 305-5 GHG Emissions Reduction\", we aim to assess the performance of companies in reducing their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Use of Carbon Offsets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_5_Reduction_of_GHG_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_reduction_or_compensation_vs_last_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862486,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+More than 90% of suppliers are from Spain+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_90_of_suppliers_are_from_Spain+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "More than 90% of suppliers are from Spain",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.6 Local suppliers\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, based on GRI 204-1 Proportion of expenditure on local suppliers, we assess the local sourcing of products offered by retailers, especially fresh produce. <br>\nThese products are likely to have the greatest environmental impact due to delocalisation because of their sales volume: in 2016, according to Femex data, in Spain we imported 1.6 million tonnes of fruit and 1.2 million tonnes of vegetables. Organisations such as Greenpeace warn of the CO2 emissions involved in this process (transport, cold storage...). Specifically, a review of studies carried out by Engineering Without Borders attributed between 15% and 20% of the greenhouse gas emissions produced by the agricultural industry to processing, packaging and transport.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_6_Local_suppliers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_90_of_suppliers_are_from_Spain+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862498,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+More than 80% of suppliers are from Spain+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_80_of_suppliers_are_from_Spain+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "More than 80% of suppliers are from Spain",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.6 Local suppliers\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, based on GRI 204-1 Proportion of expenditure on local suppliers, we assess the local sourcing of products offered by retailers, especially fresh produce. <br>\nThese products are likely to have the greatest environmental impact due to delocalisation because of their sales volume: in 2016, according to Femex data, in Spain we imported 1.6 million tonnes of fruit and 1.2 million tonnes of vegetables. Organisations such as Greenpeace warn of the CO2 emissions involved in this process (transport, cold storage...). Specifically, a review of studies carried out by Engineering Without Borders attributed between 15% and 20% of the greenhouse gas emissions produced by the agricultural industry to processing, packaging and transport.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_6_Local_suppliers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_80_of_suppliers_are_from_Spain+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862506,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+More than 70% of suppliers are from Spain+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_70_of_suppliers_are_from_Spain+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "More than 70% of suppliers are from Spain",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.6 Local suppliers\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, based on GRI 204-1 Proportion of expenditure on local suppliers, we assess the local sourcing of products offered by retailers, especially fresh produce. <br>\nThese products are likely to have the greatest environmental impact due to delocalisation because of their sales volume: in 2016, according to Femex data, in Spain we imported 1.6 million tonnes of fruit and 1.2 million tonnes of vegetables. Organisations such as Greenpeace warn of the CO2 emissions involved in this process (transport, cold storage...). Specifically, a review of studies carried out by Engineering Without Borders attributed between 15% and 20% of the greenhouse gas emissions produced by the agricultural industry to processing, packaging and transport.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_6_Local_suppliers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_70_of_suppliers_are_from_Spain+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862514,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Visibility of the national/local product in physical and online store+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Visibility_of_the_national_local_product_in_physical_and_online_store+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Visibility of the national/local product in physical and online store",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.6 Local suppliers\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, based on GRI 204-1 Proportion of expenditure on local suppliers, we assess the local sourcing of products offered by retailers, especially fresh produce. <br>\nThese products are likely to have the greatest environmental impact due to delocalisation because of their sales volume: in 2016, according to Femex data, in Spain we imported 1.6 million tonnes of fruit and 1.2 million tonnes of vegetables. Organisations such as Greenpeace warn of the CO2 emissions involved in this process (transport, cold storage...). Specifically, a review of studies carried out by Engineering Without Borders attributed between 15% and 20% of the greenhouse gas emissions produced by the agricultural industry to processing, packaging and transport.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_6_Local_suppliers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Visibility_of_the_national_local_product_in_physical_and_online_store+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862522,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Distinction of the national product in the labeling+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Distinction_of_the_national_product_in_the_labeling+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Distinction of the national product in the labeling",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.6 Local suppliers\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, based on GRI 204-1 Proportion of expenditure on local suppliers, we assess the local sourcing of products offered by retailers, especially fresh produce. <br>\nThese products are likely to have the greatest environmental impact due to delocalisation because of their sales volume: in 2016, according to Femex data, in Spain we imported 1.6 million tonnes of fruit and 1.2 million tonnes of vegetables. Organisations such as Greenpeace warn of the CO2 emissions involved in this process (transport, cold storage...). Specifically, a review of studies carried out by Engineering Without Borders attributed between 15% and 20% of the greenhouse gas emissions produced by the agricultural industry to processing, packaging and transport.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_6_Local_suppliers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Distinction_of_the_national_product_in_the_labeling+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862530,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Campaigns to promote local products+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Campaigns_to_promote_local_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Campaigns to promote local products",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.6 Local suppliers\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, based on GRI 204-1 Proportion of expenditure on local suppliers, we assess the local sourcing of products offered by retailers, especially fresh produce. <br>\nThese products are likely to have the greatest environmental impact due to delocalisation because of their sales volume: in 2016, according to Femex data, in Spain we imported 1.6 million tonnes of fruit and 1.2 million tonnes of vegetables. Organisations such as Greenpeace warn of the CO2 emissions involved in this process (transport, cold storage...). Specifically, a review of studies carried out by Engineering Without Borders attributed between 15% and 20% of the greenhouse gas emissions produced by the agricultural industry to processing, packaging and transport.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_6_Local_suppliers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Campaigns_to_promote_local_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862538,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+More than 80% of fruit & vegetables of national origin+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_80_of_fruit_vegetables_of_national_origin+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "More than 80% of fruit & vegetables of national origin",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.6 Local suppliers\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, based on GRI 204-1 Proportion of expenditure on local suppliers, we assess the local sourcing of products offered by retailers, especially fresh produce. <br>\nThese products are likely to have the greatest environmental impact due to delocalisation because of their sales volume: in 2016, according to Femex data, in Spain we imported 1.6 million tonnes of fruit and 1.2 million tonnes of vegetables. Organisations such as Greenpeace warn of the CO2 emissions involved in this process (transport, cold storage...). Specifically, a review of studies carried out by Engineering Without Borders attributed between 15% and 20% of the greenhouse gas emissions produced by the agricultural industry to processing, packaging and transport.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_6_Local_suppliers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_80_of_fruit_vegetables_of_national_origin+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862550,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+More than 50% of food of regional origin+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_50_of_food_of_regional_origin+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "More than 50% of food of regional origin",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.6 Local suppliers\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, based on GRI 204-1 Proportion of expenditure on local suppliers, we assess the local sourcing of products offered by retailers, especially fresh produce. <br>\nThese products are likely to have the greatest environmental impact due to delocalisation because of their sales volume: in 2016, according to Femex data, in Spain we imported 1.6 million tonnes of fruit and 1.2 million tonnes of vegetables. Organisations such as Greenpeace warn of the CO2 emissions involved in this process (transport, cold storage...). Specifically, a review of studies carried out by Engineering Without Borders attributed between 15% and 20% of the greenhouse gas emissions produced by the agricultural industry to processing, packaging and transport.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_6_Local_suppliers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_50_of_food_of_regional_origin+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862558,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+More than 30% of food of regional origin+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_30_of_food_of_regional_origin+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "More than 30% of food of regional origin",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.6 Local suppliers\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, based on GRI 204-1 Proportion of expenditure on local suppliers, we assess the local sourcing of products offered by retailers, especially fresh produce. <br>\nThese products are likely to have the greatest environmental impact due to delocalisation because of their sales volume: in 2016, according to Femex data, in Spain we imported 1.6 million tonnes of fruit and 1.2 million tonnes of vegetables. Organisations such as Greenpeace warn of the CO2 emissions involved in this process (transport, cold storage...). Specifically, a review of studies carried out by Engineering Without Borders attributed between 15% and 20% of the greenhouse gas emissions produced by the agricultural industry to processing, packaging and transport.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_6_Local_suppliers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+More_than_30_of_food_of_regional_origin+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862566,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+50% of light transport covered with zero emission vehicles.+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_of_light_transport_covered_with_zero_emission_vehicles+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "50% of light transport covered with zero emission vehicles.",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.7 Sustainable logistics\"\"<br>\nThe responsibility of shopping centres and in particular supermarkets for pollutant emissions lies mainly in their large logistical activity.<br>\n In Europe, lorries account for 22% of road transport emissions, although they account for only 2% of the vehicles on the roads. The EU recently set a 30% reduction target for pollutant emissions from new trucks from 2030, with an average target of 15% in 2025 compared to the levels recorded in 2019.<br>\n<br>\nIn this section, we value agile and responsible logistics, capable of adapting to changes and incorporating environmental aspects in its strategy.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_7_Sustainable_logistics.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_of_light_transport_covered_with_zero_emission_vehicles+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862574,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Introduction of zero emission vehicles in light transport.+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Introduction_of_zero_emission_vehicles_in_light_transport+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Introduction of zero emission vehicles in light transport.",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.7 Sustainable logistics\"\"<br>\nThe responsibility of shopping centres and in particular supermarkets for pollutant emissions lies mainly in their large logistical activity.<br>\n In Europe, lorries account for 22% of road transport emissions, although they account for only 2% of the vehicles on the roads. The EU recently set a 30% reduction target for pollutant emissions from new trucks from 2030, with an average target of 15% in 2025 compared to the levels recorded in 2019.<br>\n<br>\nIn this section, we value agile and responsible logistics, capable of adapting to changes and incorporating environmental aspects in its strategy.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_7_Sustainable_logistics.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Introduction_of_zero_emission_vehicles_in_light_transport+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862582,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+80% of the transport covered under the EURO 5 standard.+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_the_transport_covered_under_the_EURO_5_standard+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "80% of the transport covered under the EURO 5 standard.",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.7 Sustainable logistics\"\"<br>\nThe responsibility of shopping centres and in particular supermarkets for pollutant emissions lies mainly in their large logistical activity.<br>\n In Europe, lorries account for 22% of road transport emissions, although they account for only 2% of the vehicles on the roads. The EU recently set a 30% reduction target for pollutant emissions from new trucks from 2030, with an average target of 15% in 2025 compared to the levels recorded in 2019.<br>\n<br>\nIn this section, we value agile and responsible logistics, capable of adapting to changes and incorporating environmental aspects in its strategy.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_7_Sustainable_logistics.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_the_transport_covered_under_the_EURO_5_standard+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862590,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+80% of the transport covered under the EURO 6 standard.+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_the_transport_covered_under_the_EURO_6_standard+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "80% of the transport covered under the EURO 6 standard.",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.7 Sustainable logistics\"\"<br>\nThe responsibility of shopping centres and in particular supermarkets for pollutant emissions lies mainly in their large logistical activity.<br>\n In Europe, lorries account for 22% of road transport emissions, although they account for only 2% of the vehicles on the roads. The EU recently set a 30% reduction target for pollutant emissions from new trucks from 2030, with an average target of 15% in 2025 compared to the levels recorded in 2019.<br>\n<br>\nIn this section, we value agile and responsible logistics, capable of adapting to changes and incorporating environmental aspects in its strategy.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_7_Sustainable_logistics.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_the_transport_covered_under_the_EURO_6_standard+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862602,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Introduction of vehicles under the EURO 6 standard.+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Introduction_of_vehicles_under_the_EURO_6_standard+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Introduction of vehicles under the EURO 6 standard.",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.7 Sustainable logistics\"\"<br>\nThe responsibility of shopping centres and in particular supermarkets for pollutant emissions lies mainly in their large logistical activity.<br>\n In Europe, lorries account for 22% of road transport emissions, although they account for only 2% of the vehicles on the roads. The EU recently set a 30% reduction target for pollutant emissions from new trucks from 2030, with an average target of 15% in 2025 compared to the levels recorded in 2019.<br>\n<br>\nIn this section, we value agile and responsible logistics, capable of adapting to changes and incorporating environmental aspects in its strategy.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_7_Sustainable_logistics.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Introduction_of_vehicles_under_the_EURO_6_standard+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862610,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Heavy vehicle fill rate over 80%.+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Heavy_vehicle_fill_rate_over_80+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Heavy vehicle fill rate over 80%.",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.7 Sustainable logistics\"\"<br>\nThe responsibility of shopping centres and in particular supermarkets for pollutant emissions lies mainly in their large logistical activity.<br>\n In Europe, lorries account for 22% of road transport emissions, although they account for only 2% of the vehicles on the roads. The EU recently set a 30% reduction target for pollutant emissions from new trucks from 2030, with an average target of 15% in 2025 compared to the levels recorded in 2019.<br>\n<br>\nIn this section, we value agile and responsible logistics, capable of adapting to changes and incorporating environmental aspects in its strategy.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_7_Sustainable_logistics.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Heavy_vehicle_fill_rate_over_80+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862618,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Training on ecological driving for carriers.+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Training_on_ecological_driving_for_carriers+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Training on ecological driving for carriers.",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.7 Sustainable logistics\"\"<br>\nThe responsibility of shopping centres and in particular supermarkets for pollutant emissions lies mainly in their large logistical activity.<br>\n In Europe, lorries account for 22% of road transport emissions, although they account for only 2% of the vehicles on the roads. The EU recently set a 30% reduction target for pollutant emissions from new trucks from 2030, with an average target of 15% in 2025 compared to the levels recorded in 2019.<br>\n<br>\nIn this section, we value agile and responsible logistics, capable of adapting to changes and incorporating environmental aspects in its strategy.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_7_Sustainable_logistics.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Training_on_ecological_driving_for_carriers+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862626,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Actions to improve logistics efficiency.+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Actions_to_improve_logistics_efficiency+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Actions to improve logistics efficiency.",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.7 Sustainable logistics\"\"<br>\nThe responsibility of shopping centres and in particular supermarkets for pollutant emissions lies mainly in their large logistical activity.<br>\n In Europe, lorries account for 22% of road transport emissions, although they account for only 2% of the vehicles on the roads. The EU recently set a 30% reduction target for pollutant emissions from new trucks from 2030, with an average target of 15% in 2025 compared to the levels recorded in 2019.<br>\n<br>\nIn this section, we value agile and responsible logistics, capable of adapting to changes and incorporating environmental aspects in its strategy.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_7_Sustainable_logistics.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Actions_to_improve_logistics_efficiency+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862634,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of logistics emissions by 15%.+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_logistics_emissions_by_15+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of logistics emissions by 15%.",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.7 Sustainable logistics\"\"<br>\nThe responsibility of shopping centres and in particular supermarkets for pollutant emissions lies mainly in their large logistical activity.<br>\n In Europe, lorries account for 22% of road transport emissions, although they account for only 2% of the vehicles on the roads. The EU recently set a 30% reduction target for pollutant emissions from new trucks from 2030, with an average target of 15% in 2025 compared to the levels recorded in 2019.<br>\n<br>\nIn this section, we value agile and responsible logistics, capable of adapting to changes and incorporating environmental aspects in its strategy.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_7_Sustainable_logistics.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_logistics_emissions_by_15+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862642,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Objective to reduce logistics emissions by 20%.+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Objective_to_reduce_logistics_emissions_by_20+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Objective to reduce logistics emissions by 20%.",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"1.7 Sustainable logistics\"\"<br>\nThe responsibility of shopping centres and in particular supermarkets for pollutant emissions lies mainly in their large logistical activity.<br>\n In Europe, lorries account for 22% of road transport emissions, although they account for only 2% of the vehicles on the roads. The EU recently set a 30% reduction target for pollutant emissions from new trucks from 2030, with an average target of 15% in 2025 compared to the levels recorded in 2019.<br>\n<br>\nIn this section, we value agile and responsible logistics, capable of adapting to changes and incorporating environmental aspects in its strategy.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_7_Sustainable_logistics.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Objective_to_reduce_logistics_emissions_by_20+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862654,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+10% reduction in waste generated vs. last year+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+10_reduction_in_waste_generated_vs_last_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "10% reduction in waste generated vs. last year",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.1 Waste reduction and prevention\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts in waste reduction and waste prevention",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_1_Waste_reduction_and_prevention.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+10_reduction_in_waste_generated_vs_last_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862662,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+5% reduction in waste generated vs. last year+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_reduction_in_waste_generated_vs_last_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "5% reduction in waste generated vs. last year",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.1 Waste reduction and prevention\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts in waste reduction and waste prevention",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_1_Waste_reduction_and_prevention.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_reduction_in_waste_generated_vs_last_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862670,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Zero waste in all establishments+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_waste_in_all_establishments+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Zero waste in all establishments",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.1 Waste reduction and prevention\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts in waste reduction and waste prevention",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_1_Waste_reduction_and_prevention.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_waste_in_all_establishments+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862686,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+No distribution of advertising support on paper+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+No_distribution_of_advertising_support_on_paper+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "No distribution of advertising support on paper",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.1 Waste reduction and prevention\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts in waste reduction and waste prevention",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_1_Waste_reduction_and_prevention.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+No_distribution_of_advertising_support_on_paper+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862694,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+5% waste reduction per m2 vs previous year+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_waste_reduction_per_m2_vs_previous_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "5% waste reduction per m2 vs previous year",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.1 Waste reduction and prevention\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts in waste reduction and waste prevention",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_1_Waste_reduction_and_prevention.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_waste_reduction_per_m2_vs_previous_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862702,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Waste reduction policy+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_reduction_policy+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Waste reduction policy",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.1 Waste reduction and prevention\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts in waste reduction and waste prevention",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_1_Waste_reduction_and_prevention.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_reduction_policy+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862714,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Waste recovery and recycling rate higher than 90%+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_recovery_and_recycling_rate_higher_than_90+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Waste recovery and recycling rate higher than 90%",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.2 Performance and recycling policy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to assess companies' efforts in recycling and waste recovery",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_2_Performance_and_recycling_policy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_recovery_and_recycling_rate_higher_than_90+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862722,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Waste recovery and recycling rate higher than 80%+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_recovery_and_recycling_rate_higher_than_80+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Waste recovery and recycling rate higher than 80%",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.2 Performance and recycling policy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to assess companies' efforts in recycling and waste recovery",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_2_Performance_and_recycling_policy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_recovery_and_recycling_rate_higher_than_80+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862730,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Waste recovery and recycling rate higher than 70%+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_recovery_and_recycling_rate_higher_than_70+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Waste recovery and recycling rate higher than 70%",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.2 Performance and recycling policy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to assess companies' efforts in recycling and waste recovery",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_2_Performance_and_recycling_policy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Waste_recovery_and_recycling_rate_higher_than_70+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862738,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+100% recycling of cardboard, paper, wood and plastic+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_recycling_of_cardboard_paper_wood_and_plastic+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "100% recycling of cardboard, paper, wood and plastic",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.2 Performance and recycling policy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to assess companies' efforts in recycling and waste recovery",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_2_Performance_and_recycling_policy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_recycling_of_cardboard_paper_wood_and_plastic+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862746,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Recycling rate increase vs previous year+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recycling_rate_increase_vs_previous_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Recycling rate increase vs previous year",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.2 Performance and recycling policy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to assess companies' efforts in recycling and waste recovery",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_2_Performance_and_recycling_policy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recycling_rate_increase_vs_previous_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862754,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Provision of physical points for post-consumer recycling+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Provision_of_physical_points_for_post_consumer_recycling+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Provision of physical points for post-consumer recycling",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.2 Performance and recycling policy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to assess companies' efforts in recycling and waste recovery",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_2_Performance_and_recycling_policy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Provision_of_physical_points_for_post_consumer_recycling+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862766,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Recycling of high impact materials+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recycling_of_high_impact_materials+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Recycling of high impact materials",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.2 Performance and recycling policy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to assess companies' efforts in recycling and waste recovery",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_2_Performance_and_recycling_policy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recycling_of_high_impact_materials+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862774,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the recycled waste rate+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_recycled_waste_rate+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the recycled waste rate",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.3 Publication of waste generated\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"GRI 306-2 Waste by Type and Disposal Method\" standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish the waste they generate based on the common thread of our assessment methodology: What is not measured cannot be improved. What is good that is not published does not exist",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_3_Publication_of_waste_generated.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_recycled_waste_rate+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862782,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of waste broken down by type+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_waste_broken_down_by_type+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of waste broken down by type",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.3 Publication of waste generated\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"GRI 306-2 Waste by Type and Disposal Method\" standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish the waste they generate based on the common thread of our assessment methodology: What is not measured cannot be improved. What is good that is not published does not exist",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_3_Publication_of_waste_generated.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_waste_broken_down_by_type+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862790,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the total weight of waste+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_total_weight_of_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the total weight of waste",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.3 Publication of waste generated\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"GRI 306-2 Waste by Type and Disposal Method\" standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish the waste they generate based on the common thread of our assessment methodology: What is not measured cannot be improved. What is good that is not published does not exist",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_3_Publication_of_waste_generated.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_total_weight_of_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862798,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the weight of paper used for advertising+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_paper_used_for_advertising+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the weight of paper used for advertising",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.3 Publication of waste generated\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"GRI 306-2 Waste by Type and Disposal Method\" standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish the waste they generate based on the common thread of our assessment methodology: What is not measured cannot be improved. What is good that is not published does not exist",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_3_Publication_of_waste_generated.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_paper_used_for_advertising+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862806,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of waste intensity+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_waste_intensity+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of waste intensity",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.3 Publication of waste generated\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"GRI 306-2 Waste by Type and Disposal Method\" standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish the waste they generate based on the common thread of our assessment methodology: What is not measured cannot be improved. What is good that is not published does not exist",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_3_Publication_of_waste_generated.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_waste_intensity+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862818,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Zero waste target+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_waste_target+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Zero waste target",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.4 Waste reduction targets\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' waste reduction efforts against specific targets. We exclude from this question those targets related to other areas of the assessment, such as food waste",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 22,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_4_Waste_reduction_targets.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_waste_target+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862826,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+20% waste reduction target+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+20_waste_reduction_target+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "20% waste reduction target",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.4 Waste reduction targets\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' waste reduction efforts against specific targets. We exclude from this question those targets related to other areas of the assessment, such as food waste",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_4_Waste_reduction_targets.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+20_waste_reduction_target+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862834,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the weight of organic waste+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_organic_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the weight of organic waste",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.5 Food waste management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess supermarkets' efforts on Food Waste by focusing on how they manage and publish their various measures and targets to prevent and reduce it.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_5_Food_waste_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_organic_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862842,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Recovery of organic waste+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recovery_of_organic_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Recovery of organic waste",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.5 Food waste management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess supermarkets' efforts on Food Waste by focusing on how they manage and publish their various measures and targets to prevent and reduce it.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_5_Food_waste_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recovery_of_organic_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862850,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the organic waste recovery rate+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_organic_waste_recovery_rate+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the organic waste recovery rate",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.5 Food waste management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess supermarkets' efforts on Food Waste by focusing on how they manage and publish their various measures and targets to prevent and reduce it.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_5_Food_waste_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_organic_waste_recovery_rate+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862862,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Target to reduce food waste by 25%+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Target_to_reduce_food_waste_by_25+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Target to reduce food waste by 25%",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.5 Food waste management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess supermarkets' efforts on Food Waste by focusing on how they manage and publish their various measures and targets to prevent and reduce it.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_5_Food_waste_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Target_to_reduce_food_waste_by_25+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862870,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Non-marketable food donation+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Non_marketable_food_donation+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Non-marketable food donation",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.5 Food waste management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess supermarkets' efforts on Food Waste by focusing on how they manage and publish their various measures and targets to prevent and reduce it.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_5_Food_waste_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Non_marketable_food_donation+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862878,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Promotion against food waste+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_against_food_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Promotion against food waste",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.5 Food waste management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess supermarkets' efforts on Food Waste by focusing on how they manage and publish their various measures and targets to prevent and reduce it.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_5_Food_waste_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_against_food_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862886,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Innovative initiatives against food waste+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Innovative_initiatives_against_food_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Innovative initiatives against food waste",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.5 Food waste management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess supermarkets' efforts on Food Waste by focusing on how they manage and publish their various measures and targets to prevent and reduce it.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_5_Food_waste_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Innovative_initiatives_against_food_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862894,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Incentives for the sale of products about to expire+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Incentives_for_the_sale_of_products_about_to_expire+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Incentives for the sale of products about to expire",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.5 Food waste management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess supermarkets' efforts on Food Waste by focusing on how they manage and publish their various measures and targets to prevent and reduce it.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_5_Food_waste_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Incentives_for_the_sale_of_products_about_to_expire+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862902,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Incentives for the sale of \"ugly\" fruits and vegetables+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Incentives_for_the_sale_of_ugly_fruits_and_vegetables+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Incentives for the sale of \"ugly\" fruits and vegetables",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.5 Food waste management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess supermarkets' efforts on Food Waste by focusing on how they manage and publish their various measures and targets to prevent and reduce it.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_5_Food_waste_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Incentives_for_the_sale_of_ugly_fruits_and_vegetables+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862910,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the weight of hazardous waste+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_hazardous_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the weight of hazardous waste",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.6 Hazardous waste management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"GRI 306-2 Waste by Type and Disposal Method\" standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish data related to the management and recycling of their hazardous waste.<br>\nIn the case of supermarkets, this waste can be batteries, fluorescent bulbs, used oil, car batteries and fluorescent bulbs containing mercury, electronic and computer equipment, toners, etc...<br>\nNot to be confused with hazardous waste collected from customers via in-store collection points",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_6_Hazardous_waste_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_hazardous_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862918,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the recycling rate for hazardous waste+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_recycling_rate_for_hazardous_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the recycling rate for hazardous waste",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.6 Hazardous waste management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"GRI 306-2 Waste by Type and Disposal Method\" standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish data related to the management and recycling of their hazardous waste.<br>\nIn the case of supermarkets, this waste can be batteries, fluorescent bulbs, used oil, car batteries and fluorescent bulbs containing mercury, electronic and computer equipment, toners, etc...<br>\nNot to be confused with hazardous waste collected from customers via in-store collection points",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_6_Hazardous_waste_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_recycling_rate_for_hazardous_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862926,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+100% recycling of hazardous waste+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_recycling_of_hazardous_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "100% recycling of hazardous waste",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.6 Hazardous waste management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"GRI 306-2 Waste by Type and Disposal Method\" standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish data related to the management and recycling of their hazardous waste.<br>\nIn the case of supermarkets, this waste can be batteries, fluorescent bulbs, used oil, car batteries and fluorescent bulbs containing mercury, electronic and computer equipment, toners, etc...<br>\nNot to be confused with hazardous waste collected from customers via in-store collection points",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_6_Hazardous_waste_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_recycling_of_hazardous_waste+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862938,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the weight of private label packaging+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_private_label_packaging+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the weight of private label packaging",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.7 Management of containers and packaging\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we evaluate companies' efforts in packaging management by focusing on their actions on recycling, reduction and reuse, use of sustainable materials, publication of their data, prevention and education.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_7_Management_of_containers_and_packaging.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_weight_of_private_label_packaging+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862946,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reuse of 90% of logistics packaging+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reuse_of_90_of_logistics_packaging+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reuse of 90% of logistics packaging",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.7 Management of containers and packaging\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we evaluate companies' efforts in packaging management by focusing on their actions on recycling, reduction and reuse, use of sustainable materials, publication of their data, prevention and education.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_7_Management_of_containers_and_packaging.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reuse_of_90_of_logistics_packaging+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862954,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of the weight of packaging by 10%+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_the_weight_of_packaging_by_10+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of the weight of packaging by 10%",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.7 Management of containers and packaging\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we evaluate companies' efforts in packaging management by focusing on their actions on recycling, reduction and reuse, use of sustainable materials, publication of their data, prevention and education.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_7_Management_of_containers_and_packaging.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_the_weight_of_packaging_by_10+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862962,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Commitment to 100% recyclable /reusable packaging by 2030+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Commitment_to_100_recyclable_reusable_packaging_by_2030+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Commitment to 100% recyclable /reusable packaging by 2030",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.7 Management of containers and packaging\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we evaluate companies' efforts in packaging management by focusing on their actions on recycling, reduction and reuse, use of sustainable materials, publication of their data, prevention and education.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_7_Management_of_containers_and_packaging.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Commitment_to_100_recyclable_reusable_packaging_by_2030+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862970,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable packaging in home deliveries+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_packaging_in_home_deliveries+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Sustainable packaging in home deliveries",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.7 Management of containers and packaging\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we evaluate companies' efforts in packaging management by focusing on their actions on recycling, reduction and reuse, use of sustainable materials, publication of their data, prevention and education.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_7_Management_of_containers_and_packaging.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_packaging_in_home_deliveries+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862978,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Measures to avoid overpacking+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_avoid_overpacking+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Measures to avoid overpacking",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.7 Management of containers and packaging\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we evaluate companies' efforts in packaging management by focusing on their actions on recycling, reduction and reuse, use of sustainable materials, publication of their data, prevention and education.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_7_Management_of_containers_and_packaging.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_avoid_overpacking+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862990,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Materials recycling education+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Materials_recycling_education+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Materials recycling education",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.7 Management of containers and packaging\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we evaluate companies' efforts in packaging management by focusing on their actions on recycling, reduction and reuse, use of sustainable materials, publication of their data, prevention and education.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_7_Management_of_containers_and_packaging.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Materials_recycling_education+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6862998,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Roadmap against single-use plastic+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Roadmap_against_single_use_plastic+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Roadmap against single-use plastic",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_8_Single_use_plastic_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Roadmap_against_single_use_plastic+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863006,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Investment plans in reusable packaging+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Investment_plans_in_reusable_packaging+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Investment plans in reusable packaging",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_8_Single_use_plastic_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Investment_plans_in_reusable_packaging+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863014,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Absence of false solutions against plastic+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Absence_of_false_solutions_against_plastic+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Absence of false solutions against plastic",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_8_Single_use_plastic_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Absence_of_false_solutions_against_plastic+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863022,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Elimination of single-use packaging for fruit and vegetables+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_single_use_packaging_for_fruit_and_vegetables+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Elimination of single-use packaging for fruit and vegetables",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_8_Single_use_plastic_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_single_use_packaging_for_fruit_and_vegetables+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863030,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Increase in bulk sales+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Increase_in_bulk_sales+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Increase in bulk sales",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_8_Single_use_plastic_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Increase_in_bulk_sales+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863038,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Disposal of single-use bags+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Disposal_of_single_use_bags+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Disposal of single-use bags",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_8_Single_use_plastic_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Disposal_of_single_use_bags+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863050,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Disposal of non-recyclable single-use items+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Disposal_of_non_recyclable_single_use_items+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Disposal of non-recyclable single-use items",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_8_Single_use_plastic_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Disposal_of_non_recyclable_single_use_items+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863062,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of plastic consumption data+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_plastic_consumption_data+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of plastic consumption data",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_8_Single_use_plastic_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_plastic_consumption_data+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863074,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of single-use plastics in the supply chain+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_single_use_plastics_in_the_supply_chain+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of single-use plastics in the supply chain",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_8_Single_use_plastic_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_single_use_plastics_in_the_supply_chain+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863082,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Elimination of non-100% recyclable packaging+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_non_100_recyclable_packaging+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Elimination of non-100% recyclable packaging",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.8  Single-use plastic management\"\"<br>\nThis metric is based on Greenpeace Spain's evaluation study \"Ranking of supermarkets' plastic footprint\" carried out in late 2018 and late 2019.    <br>\n<br>\nAlthough the behaviour of companies with regard to the use and disposal of plastic at their points of sale should be included in our previous metric \"\"2.7 Packaging management\"\" we believe that due to the impact of this material on the environment it deserves to be treated individually. <br>\nFor this we have used the most complete and rigorous corporate evaluation study on plastic use that currently exists in Spain and which specialises in the rating of supermarkets, such as this \"Greenpeace Plastic Footprint Ranking\".",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_8_Single_use_plastic_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_non_100_recyclable_packaging+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863090,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of energy within the organization+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_energy_within_the_organization+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of energy within the organization",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.1 Registration and publication of the energy consumed\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the GRI 302: Energy standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish their energy consumption inside and outside the organisation.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_1_Registration_and_publication_of_the_energy_consumed.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_energy_within_the_organization+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863098,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of energy outside the organization+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_energy_outside_the_organization+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of energy outside the organization",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.1 Registration and publication of the energy consumed\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the GRI 302: Energy standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish their energy consumption inside and outside the organisation.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_1_Registration_and_publication_of_the_energy_consumed.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_energy_outside_the_organization+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863106,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the intensity of energy consumed+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_intensity_of_energy_consumed+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the intensity of energy consumed",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.1 Registration and publication of the energy consumed\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the GRI 302: Energy standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish their energy consumption inside and outside the organisation.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_1_Registration_and_publication_of_the_energy_consumed.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_intensity_of_energy_consumed+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863114,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of consumed energy broken down by primary sources+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_consumed_energy_broken_down_by_primary_sources+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of consumed energy broken down by primary sources",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.1 Registration and publication of the energy consumed\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the GRI 302: Energy standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish their energy consumption inside and outside the organisation.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_1_Registration_and_publication_of_the_energy_consumed.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_consumed_energy_broken_down_by_primary_sources+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863126,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the energy consumed in the last 2 years+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_energy_consumed_in_the_last_2_years+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the energy consumed in the last 2 years",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.1 Registration and publication of the energy consumed\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the GRI 302: Energy standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish their energy consumption inside and outside the organisation.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_1_Registration_and_publication_of_the_energy_consumed.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_energy_consumed_in_the_last_2_years+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863134,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Measures to improve energy efficiency+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_improve_energy_efficiency+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Measures to improve energy efficiency",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.2 Efficiency and energy saving\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we refer to the 2 most important aspects of sustainable energy consumption: Efficiency and Savings.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy saving involves a change in consumption habits such as avoiding energy waste.<br>\nEnergy efficiency is the fact of minimising the amount of energy needed to satisfy the demand without affecting its quality; it means replacing one piece of equipment with another that, with the same performance, consumes less electricity, for example.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_2_Efficiency_and_energy_saving.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Measures_to_improve_energy_efficiency+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863142,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+25% energy saving target+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+25_energy_saving_target+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "25% energy saving target",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.2 Efficiency and energy saving\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we refer to the 2 most important aspects of sustainable energy consumption: Efficiency and Savings.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy saving involves a change in consumption habits such as avoiding energy waste.<br>\nEnergy efficiency is the fact of minimising the amount of energy needed to satisfy the demand without affecting its quality; it means replacing one piece of equipment with another that, with the same performance, consumes less electricity, for example.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_2_Efficiency_and_energy_saving.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+25_energy_saving_target+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863150,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of energy intensity by 10%+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_energy_intensity_by_10+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of energy intensity by 10%",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.2 Efficiency and energy saving\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we refer to the 2 most important aspects of sustainable energy consumption: Efficiency and Savings.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy saving involves a change in consumption habits such as avoiding energy waste.<br>\nEnergy efficiency is the fact of minimising the amount of energy needed to satisfy the demand without affecting its quality; it means replacing one piece of equipment with another that, with the same performance, consumes less electricity, for example.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_2_Efficiency_and_energy_saving.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_energy_intensity_by_10+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863158,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction in energy intensity compared to the previous year+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_in_energy_intensity_compared_to_the_previous_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction in energy intensity compared to the previous year",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.2 Efficiency and energy saving\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we refer to the 2 most important aspects of sustainable energy consumption: Efficiency and Savings.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy saving involves a change in consumption habits such as avoiding energy waste.<br>\nEnergy efficiency is the fact of minimising the amount of energy needed to satisfy the demand without affecting its quality; it means replacing one piece of equipment with another that, with the same performance, consumes less electricity, for example.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_2_Efficiency_and_energy_saving.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_in_energy_intensity_compared_to_the_previous_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863166,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy certification in all facilities+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_certification_in_all_facilities+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Energy certification in all facilities",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.2 Efficiency and energy saving\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we refer to the 2 most important aspects of sustainable energy consumption: Efficiency and Savings.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy saving involves a change in consumption habits such as avoiding energy waste.<br>\nEnergy efficiency is the fact of minimising the amount of energy needed to satisfy the demand without affecting its quality; it means replacing one piece of equipment with another that, with the same performance, consumes less electricity, for example.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_2_Efficiency_and_energy_saving.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_certification_in_all_facilities+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863183,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy certification in some facilities+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_certification_in_some_facilities+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Energy certification in some facilities",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.2 Efficiency and energy saving\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we refer to the 2 most important aspects of sustainable energy consumption: Efficiency and Savings.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy saving involves a change in consumption habits such as avoiding energy waste.<br>\nEnergy efficiency is the fact of minimising the amount of energy needed to satisfy the demand without affecting its quality; it means replacing one piece of equipment with another that, with the same performance, consumes less electricity, for example.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_2_Efficiency_and_energy_saving.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_certification_in_some_facilities+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863191,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy savings of 5% compared to the previous year+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_savings_of_5_compared_to_the_previous_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Energy savings of 5% compared to the previous year",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.2 Efficiency and energy saving\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we refer to the 2 most important aspects of sustainable energy consumption: Efficiency and Savings.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy saving involves a change in consumption habits such as avoiding energy waste.<br>\nEnergy efficiency is the fact of minimising the amount of energy needed to satisfy the demand without affecting its quality; it means replacing one piece of equipment with another that, with the same performance, consumes less electricity, for example.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_2_Efficiency_and_energy_saving.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_savings_of_5_compared_to_the_previous_year+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863199,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Electricity less than 100 Kwh per m2 of commercial surface+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Electricity_less_than_100_Kwh_per_m2_of_commercial_surface+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Electricity less than 100 Kwh per m2 of commercial surface",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.2 Efficiency and energy saving\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we refer to the 2 most important aspects of sustainable energy consumption: Efficiency and Savings.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy saving involves a change in consumption habits such as avoiding energy waste.<br>\nEnergy efficiency is the fact of minimising the amount of energy needed to satisfy the demand without affecting its quality; it means replacing one piece of equipment with another that, with the same performance, consumes less electricity, for example.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_2_Efficiency_and_energy_saving.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Electricity_less_than_100_Kwh_per_m2_of_commercial_surface+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863207,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Electricity  less than 350 Kwh per m2 of commercial area+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Electricity_less_than_350_Kwh_per_m2_of_commercial_area+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Electricity  less than 350 Kwh per m2 of commercial area",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.2 Efficiency and energy saving\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we refer to the 2 most important aspects of sustainable energy consumption: Efficiency and Savings.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy saving involves a change in consumption habits such as avoiding energy waste.<br>\nEnergy efficiency is the fact of minimising the amount of energy needed to satisfy the demand without affecting its quality; it means replacing one piece of equipment with another that, with the same performance, consumes less electricity, for example.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_2_Efficiency_and_energy_saving.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Electricity_less_than_350_Kwh_per_m2_of_commercial_area+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863215,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Electricity less than 750 Kwh per m2 of commercial surface+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Electricity_less_than_750_Kwh_per_m2_of_commercial_surface+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Electricity less than 750 Kwh per m2 of commercial surface",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.2 Efficiency and energy saving\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we refer to the 2 most important aspects of sustainable energy consumption: Efficiency and Savings.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy saving involves a change in consumption habits such as avoiding energy waste.<br>\nEnergy efficiency is the fact of minimising the amount of energy needed to satisfy the demand without affecting its quality; it means replacing one piece of equipment with another that, with the same performance, consumes less electricity, for example.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_2_Efficiency_and_energy_saving.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Electricity_less_than_750_Kwh_per_m2_of_commercial_surface+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863227,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Campaigns that promote energy saving+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Campaigns_that_promote_energy_saving+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Campaigns that promote energy saving",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.2 Efficiency and energy saving\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we refer to the 2 most important aspects of sustainable energy consumption: Efficiency and Savings.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy saving involves a change in consumption habits such as avoiding energy waste.<br>\nEnergy efficiency is the fact of minimising the amount of energy needed to satisfy the demand without affecting its quality; it means replacing one piece of equipment with another that, with the same performance, consumes less electricity, for example.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Education Initiatives",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_2_Efficiency_and_energy_saving.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Campaigns_that_promote_energy_saving+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863235,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy 100% renewable+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_100_renewable+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Energy 100% renewable",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.3 Renewable energy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts to source energy from both purchased and self-generated renewable sources.<br>\n<br>\nRenewable energy or 'green energy' generally emits fewer GHG emissions than other energy sources that supply the electricity grid. <br>\n<br>\nExamples are solar photovoltaic panels, solar thermal, geothermal energy, landfill gas, low-impact hydropower and wind turbines. This description can be found on page 98 and chapter 4 of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_3_Renewable_energy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_100_renewable+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863243,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy 75% renewable+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_75_renewable+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Energy 75% renewable",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.3 Renewable energy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts to source energy from both purchased and self-generated renewable sources.<br>\n<br>\nRenewable energy or 'green energy' generally emits fewer GHG emissions than other energy sources that supply the electricity grid. <br>\n<br>\nExamples are solar photovoltaic panels, solar thermal, geothermal energy, landfill gas, low-impact hydropower and wind turbines. This description can be found on page 98 and chapter 4 of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_3_Renewable_energy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_75_renewable+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863251,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy 50% renewable+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_50_renewable+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Energy 50% renewable",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.3 Renewable energy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts to source energy from both purchased and self-generated renewable sources.<br>\n<br>\nRenewable energy or 'green energy' generally emits fewer GHG emissions than other energy sources that supply the electricity grid. <br>\n<br>\nExamples are solar photovoltaic panels, solar thermal, geothermal energy, landfill gas, low-impact hydropower and wind turbines. This description can be found on page 98 and chapter 4 of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_3_Renewable_energy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_50_renewable+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863259,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Energy 30% renewable+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_30_renewable+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Energy 30% renewable",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.3 Renewable energy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts to source energy from both purchased and self-generated renewable sources.<br>\n<br>\nRenewable energy or 'green energy' generally emits fewer GHG emissions than other energy sources that supply the electricity grid. <br>\n<br>\nExamples are solar photovoltaic panels, solar thermal, geothermal energy, landfill gas, low-impact hydropower and wind turbines. This description can be found on page 98 and chapter 4 of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_3_Renewable_energy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Energy_30_renewable+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863267,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Use of self-generated renewable energy+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Use_of_self_generated_renewable_energy+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Use of self-generated renewable energy",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.3 Renewable energy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts to source energy from both purchased and self-generated renewable sources.<br>\n<br>\nRenewable energy or 'green energy' generally emits fewer GHG emissions than other energy sources that supply the electricity grid. <br>\n<br>\nExamples are solar photovoltaic panels, solar thermal, geothermal energy, landfill gas, low-impact hydropower and wind turbines. This description can be found on page 98 and chapter 4 of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_3_Renewable_energy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Use_of_self_generated_renewable_energy+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863279,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Goals on renewable energy supply+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Goals_on_renewable_energy_supply+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Goals on renewable energy supply",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"3.3 Renewable energy\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts to source energy from both purchased and self-generated renewable sources.<br>\n<br>\nRenewable energy or 'green energy' generally emits fewer GHG emissions than other energy sources that supply the electricity grid. <br>\n<br>\nExamples are solar photovoltaic panels, solar thermal, geothermal energy, landfill gas, low-impact hydropower and wind turbines. This description can be found on page 98 and chapter 4 of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_3_Renewable_energy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Goals_on_renewable_energy_supply+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863292,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of water consumption in m3+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_water_consumption_in_m3+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of water consumption in m3",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"4.1 Publication of water consumption\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" standard, we intend to evaluate the efforts of companies to measure and publish their absolute and relative water consumption and take the first steps towards measuring the water footprint of the minus some of their products.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_1_Publication_of_water_consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_water_consumption_in_m3+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863300,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the water consumption ratio+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_water_consumption_ratio+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the water consumption ratio",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"4.1 Publication of water consumption\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" standard, we intend to evaluate the efforts of companies to measure and publish their absolute and relative water consumption and take the first steps towards measuring the water footprint of the minus some of their products.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_1_Publication_of_water_consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_water_consumption_ratio+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863308,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Publication of the water footprint of the own brand+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_water_footprint_of_the_own_brand+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Publication of the water footprint of the own brand",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"4.1 Publication of water consumption\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" standard, we intend to evaluate the efforts of companies to measure and publish their absolute and relative water consumption and take the first steps towards measuring the water footprint of the minus some of their products.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_1_Publication_of_water_consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Publication_of_the_water_footprint_of_the_own_brand+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863316,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Water consumption reduction by 10%+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_consumption_reduction_by_10+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Water consumption reduction by 10%",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"4.2 Management and reduction of water consumption\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the standard \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" we intend to evaluate the efforts of companies to reduce and sustainably manage their water consumption and take the first steps in order to control the water impact in their chain of supply",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_2_Management_and_reduction_of_water_consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_consumption_reduction_by_10+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863324,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of the water consumption rate by 5%+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_the_water_consumption_rate_by_5+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of the water consumption rate by 5%",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"4.2 Management and reduction of water consumption\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the standard \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" we intend to evaluate the efforts of companies to reduce and sustainably manage their water consumption and take the first steps in order to control the water impact in their chain of supply",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_2_Management_and_reduction_of_water_consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_the_water_consumption_rate_by_5+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863336,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Objectives to reduce water consumption+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Objectives_to_reduce_water_consumption+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Objectives to reduce water consumption",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"4.2 Management and reduction of water consumption\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the standard \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" we intend to evaluate the efforts of companies to reduce and sustainably manage their water consumption and take the first steps in order to control the water impact in their chain of supply",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_2_Management_and_reduction_of_water_consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Objectives_to_reduce_water_consumption+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863344,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Water consumption requirements for the supply chain+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_consumption_requirements_for_the_supply_chain+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Water consumption requirements for the supply chain",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"4.2 Management and reduction of water consumption\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the standard \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" we intend to evaluate the efforts of companies to reduce and sustainably manage their water consumption and take the first steps in order to control the water impact in their chain of supply",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_2_Management_and_reduction_of_water_consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_consumption_requirements_for_the_supply_chain+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863352,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Water saving measures in own facilities+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_saving_measures_in_own_facilities+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Water saving measures in own facilities",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"4.2 Management and reduction of water consumption\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the standard \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" we intend to evaluate the efforts of companies to reduce and sustainably manage their water consumption and take the first steps in order to control the water impact in their chain of supply",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_2_Management_and_reduction_of_water_consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_saving_measures_in_own_facilities+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863360,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Water saving measures in the production chain+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_saving_measures_in_the_production_chain+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Water saving measures in the production chain",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"4.2 Management and reduction of water consumption\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the standard \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" we intend to evaluate the efforts of companies to reduce and sustainably manage their water consumption and take the first steps in order to control the water impact in their chain of supply",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_2_Management_and_reduction_of_water_consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_saving_measures_in_the_production_chain+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863368,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Actions to promote the protection and saving of water+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Actions_to_promote_the_protection_and_saving_of_water+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Actions to promote the protection and saving of water",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"4.2 Management and reduction of water consumption\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the standard \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" we intend to evaluate the efforts of companies to reduce and sustainably manage their water consumption and take the first steps in order to control the water impact in their chain of supply",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_2_Management_and_reduction_of_water_consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Actions_to_promote_the_protection_and_saving_of_water+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863380,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Solid microplastics removal+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Solid_microplastics_removal+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Solid microplastics removal",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"4.3 Wastewater and recycling\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the standard \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" we intend to take a first step in the area of ??responsibility of mass consumption companies regarding the impact of their production chain on water, specifically regarding regarding microplastics dumped in textile and cosmetic manufacturing, in addition to knowing if they adopt recycling and reuse measures of water in order to achieve greater efficiency in their consumption",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 22,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_3_Wastewater_and_recycling.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Solid_microplastics_removal+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863388,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Recycling of water in the production chain+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recycling_of_water_in_the_production_chain+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Recycling of water in the production chain",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"4.3 Wastewater and recycling\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the standard \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" we intend to take a first step in the area of ??responsibility of mass consumption companies regarding the impact of their production chain on water, specifically regarding regarding microplastics dumped in textile and cosmetic manufacturing, in addition to knowing if they adopt recycling and reuse measures of water in order to achieve greater efficiency in their consumption",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_3_Wastewater_and_recycling.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Recycling_of_water_in_the_production_chain+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863396,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Water recycling in own facilities+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_recycling_in_own_facilities+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Water recycling in own facilities",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"4.3 Wastewater and recycling\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the standard \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" we intend to take a first step in the area of ??responsibility of mass consumption companies regarding the impact of their production chain on water, specifically regarding regarding microplastics dumped in textile and cosmetic manufacturing, in addition to knowing if they adopt recycling and reuse measures of water in order to achieve greater efficiency in their consumption",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_3_Wastewater_and_recycling.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Water_recycling_in_own_facilities+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863404,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Declarations on impacts on biodiversity+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Declarations_on_impacts_on_biodiversity+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Declarations on impacts on biodiversity",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.1 Protection of biodiversity and management of the impacts of the activity\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"\" GRI 304: Biodiversity \"\" standard, we intend to evaluate how companies recognize and manage the impacts of their activity on biodiversity and establish measures to minimize and preserve them",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_1_Protection_of_biodiversity_and_management_of_the_impacts_of_the_activity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Declarations_on_impacts_on_biodiversity+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863412,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Compliance and impact assessment of the new facilities+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Compliance_and_impact_assessment_of_the_new_facilities+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Compliance and impact assessment of the new facilities",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.1 Protection of biodiversity and management of the impacts of the activity\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"\" GRI 304: Biodiversity \"\" standard, we intend to evaluate how companies recognize and manage the impacts of their activity on biodiversity and establish measures to minimize and preserve them",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_1_Protection_of_biodiversity_and_management_of_the_impacts_of_the_activity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Compliance_and_impact_assessment_of_the_new_facilities+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863420,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Impacts on biodiversity in the supply chain+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Impacts_on_biodiversity_in_the_supply_chain+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Impacts on biodiversity in the supply chain",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.1 Protection of biodiversity and management of the impacts of the activity\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"\" GRI 304: Biodiversity \"\" standard, we intend to evaluate how companies recognize and manage the impacts of their activity on biodiversity and establish measures to minimize and preserve them",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_1_Protection_of_biodiversity_and_management_of_the_impacts_of_the_activity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Impacts_on_biodiversity_in_the_supply_chain+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863428,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Promotion of the reduction of meat consumption+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_the_reduction_of_meat_consumption+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Promotion of the reduction of meat consumption",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.1 Protection of biodiversity and management of the impacts of the activity\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"\" GRI 304: Biodiversity \"\" standard, we intend to evaluate how companies recognize and manage the impacts of their activity on biodiversity and establish measures to minimize and preserve them",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_1_Protection_of_biodiversity_and_management_of_the_impacts_of_the_activity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_the_reduction_of_meat_consumption+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863438,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Biodiversity protection measures+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Biodiversity_protection_measures+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Biodiversity protection measures",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.1 Protection of biodiversity and management of the impacts of the activity\"\"<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"\" GRI 304: Biodiversity \"\" standard, we intend to evaluate how companies recognize and manage the impacts of their activity on biodiversity and establish measures to minimize and preserve them",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_1_Protection_of_biodiversity_and_management_of_the_impacts_of_the_activity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Biodiversity_protection_measures+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863448,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Fish labeling compliance+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Fish_labeling_compliance+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Fish labeling compliance",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_2_Sustainable_fishing.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Fish_labeling_compliance+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863456,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Promotion of sustainable fishing products+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_sustainable_fishing_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Promotion of sustainable fishing products",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_2_Sustainable_fishing.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_sustainable_fishing_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863464,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable fishing purchasing policy+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_fishing_purchasing_policy+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Sustainable fishing purchasing policy",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_2_Sustainable_fishing.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_fishing_purchasing_policy+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863472,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Illegal fishing ban+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Illegal_fishing_ban+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Illegal fishing ban",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_2_Sustainable_fishing.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Illegal_fishing_ban+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863480,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+No commercialization of conflictive species+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+No_commercialization_of_conflictive_species+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "No commercialization of conflictive species",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_2_Sustainable_fishing.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+No_commercialization_of_conflictive_species+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863488,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Principles of sustainable aquaculture+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Principles_of_sustainable_aquaculture+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Principles of sustainable aquaculture",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_2_Sustainable_fishing.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Principles_of_sustainable_aquaculture+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863500,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+80% of certified fresh fish+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_certified_fresh_fish+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "80% of certified fresh fish",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_2_Sustainable_fishing.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_certified_fresh_fish+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863508,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+50% of certified fresh fish+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_of_certified_fresh_fish+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "50% of certified fresh fish",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_2_Sustainable_fishing.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_of_certified_fresh_fish+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863516,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Offer of certified fresh fish+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Offer_of_certified_fresh_fish+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Offer of certified fresh fish",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_2_Sustainable_fishing.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Offer_of_certified_fresh_fish+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863524,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+80% of certified canned fish+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_certified_canned_fish+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "80% of certified canned fish",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_2_Sustainable_fishing.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+80_of_certified_canned_fish+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863532,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+50% of certified canned fish+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_of_certified_canned_fish+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "50% of certified canned fish",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_2_Sustainable_fishing.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_of_certified_canned_fish+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863540,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Offer of certified canned fish+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Offer_of_certified_canned_fish+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Offer of certified canned fish",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_2_Sustainable_fishing.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Offer_of_certified_canned_fish+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863552,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable fishing policy required of suppliers+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_fishing_policy_required_of_suppliers+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Sustainable fishing policy required of suppliers",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.2 Sustainable fishing\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainab",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_2_Sustainable_fishing.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_fishing_policy_required_of_suppliers+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863560,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Pesticide residue rate lower than legal+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Pesticide_residue_rate_lower_than_legal+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Pesticide residue rate lower than legal",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.3 Organic and sustainable products\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the distribution and promotion of organic products and the level of pesticide residues and sustainable origin of their fruit and vegetables.<br>\n<br>\nThe organic products business is worth 1,000 million euros in Spain, with year-on-year growth of 25%, thanks mainly to fruit, vegetables, vegetable drinks and eggs.<br>\nLidl is the chain with the best sales success in organic products with the highest share of the organic market, specifically 16.5 points, according to 2018 data from the consultancy firm Kantar Worldpanel. It is followed by Carrefour (14.7 points) and Aldi (12.4 points).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_3_Organic_and_sustainable_products.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Pesticide_residue_rate_lower_than_legal+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863568,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Environmental certification in fruit and vegetables+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Environmental_certification_in_fruit_and_vegetables+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Environmental certification in fruit and vegetables",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.3 Organic and sustainable products\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the distribution and promotion of organic products and the level of pesticide residues and sustainable origin of their fruit and vegetables.<br>\n<br>\nThe organic products business is worth 1,000 million euros in Spain, with year-on-year growth of 25%, thanks mainly to fruit, vegetables, vegetable drinks and eggs.<br>\nLidl is the chain with the best sales success in organic products with the highest share of the organic market, specifically 16.5 points, according to 2018 data from the consultancy firm Kantar Worldpanel. It is followed by Carrefour (14.7 points) and Aldi (12.4 points).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_3_Organic_and_sustainable_products.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Environmental_certification_in_fruit_and_vegetables+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863581,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Green Products Strategy+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Green_Products_Strategy+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Green Products Strategy",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.3 Organic and sustainable products\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the distribution and promotion of organic products and the level of pesticide residues and sustainable origin of their fruit and vegetables.<br>\n<br>\nThe organic products business is worth 1,000 million euros in Spain, with year-on-year growth of 25%, thanks mainly to fruit, vegetables, vegetable drinks and eggs.<br>\nLidl is the chain with the best sales success in organic products with the highest share of the organic market, specifically 16.5 points, according to 2018 data from the consultancy firm Kantar Worldpanel. It is followed by Carrefour (14.7 points) and Aldi (12.4 points).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_3_Organic_and_sustainable_products.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Green_Products_Strategy+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863589,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Promotion of the consumption of organic products+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_the_consumption_of_organic_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Promotion of the consumption of organic products",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.3 Organic and sustainable products\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the distribution and promotion of organic products and the level of pesticide residues and sustainable origin of their fruit and vegetables.<br>\n<br>\nThe organic products business is worth 1,000 million euros in Spain, with year-on-year growth of 25%, thanks mainly to fruit, vegetables, vegetable drinks and eggs.<br>\nLidl is the chain with the best sales success in organic products with the highest share of the organic market, specifically 16.5 points, according to 2018 data from the consultancy firm Kantar Worldpanel. It is followed by Carrefour (14.7 points) and Aldi (12.4 points).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_3_Organic_and_sustainable_products.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_the_consumption_of_organic_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863597,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Own range of organic products+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Own_range_of_organic_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Own range of organic products",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.3 Organic and sustainable products\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the distribution and promotion of organic products and the level of pesticide residues and sustainable origin of their fruit and vegetables.<br>\n<br>\nThe organic products business is worth 1,000 million euros in Spain, with year-on-year growth of 25%, thanks mainly to fruit, vegetables, vegetable drinks and eggs.<br>\nLidl is the chain with the best sales success in organic products with the highest share of the organic market, specifically 16.5 points, according to 2018 data from the consultancy firm Kantar Worldpanel. It is followed by Carrefour (14.7 points) and Aldi (12.4 points).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_3_Organic_and_sustainable_products.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Own_range_of_organic_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863605,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Support to suppliers in the conversion to organic production+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Support_to_suppliers_in_the_conversion_to_organic_production+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Support to suppliers in the conversion to organic production",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.3 Organic and sustainable products\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the distribution and promotion of organic products and the level of pesticide residues and sustainable origin of their fruit and vegetables.<br>\n<br>\nThe organic products business is worth 1,000 million euros in Spain, with year-on-year growth of 25%, thanks mainly to fruit, vegetables, vegetable drinks and eggs.<br>\nLidl is the chain with the best sales success in organic products with the highest share of the organic market, specifically 16.5 points, according to 2018 data from the consultancy firm Kantar Worldpanel. It is followed by Carrefour (14.7 points) and Aldi (12.4 points).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_3_Organic_and_sustainable_products.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Support_to_suppliers_in_the_conversion_to_organic_production+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863617,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Top 1 in organic products sales+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Top_1_in_organic_products_sales+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Top 1 in organic products sales",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.3 Organic and sustainable products\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the distribution and promotion of organic products and the level of pesticide residues and sustainable origin of their fruit and vegetables.<br>\n<br>\nThe organic products business is worth 1,000 million euros in Spain, with year-on-year growth of 25%, thanks mainly to fruit, vegetables, vegetable drinks and eggs.<br>\nLidl is the chain with the best sales success in organic products with the highest share of the organic market, specifically 16.5 points, according to 2018 data from the consultancy firm Kantar Worldpanel. It is followed by Carrefour (14.7 points) and Aldi (12.4 points).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_3_Organic_and_sustainable_products.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Top_1_in_organic_products_sales+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863625,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Top 2 in organic products sales+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Top_2_in_organic_products_sales+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Top 2 in organic products sales",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.3 Organic and sustainable products\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the distribution and promotion of organic products and the level of pesticide residues and sustainable origin of their fruit and vegetables.<br>\n<br>\nThe organic products business is worth 1,000 million euros in Spain, with year-on-year growth of 25%, thanks mainly to fruit, vegetables, vegetable drinks and eggs.<br>\nLidl is the chain with the best sales success in organic products with the highest share of the organic market, specifically 16.5 points, according to 2018 data from the consultancy firm Kantar Worldpanel. It is followed by Carrefour (14.7 points) and Aldi (12.4 points).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_3_Organic_and_sustainable_products.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Top_2_in_organic_products_sales+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863633,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Top 3 in organic products sales+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Top_3_in_organic_products_sales+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Top 3 in organic products sales",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.3 Organic and sustainable products\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the distribution and promotion of organic products and the level of pesticide residues and sustainable origin of their fruit and vegetables.<br>\n<br>\nThe organic products business is worth 1,000 million euros in Spain, with year-on-year growth of 25%, thanks mainly to fruit, vegetables, vegetable drinks and eggs.<br>\nLidl is the chain with the best sales success in organic products with the highest share of the organic market, specifically 16.5 points, according to 2018 data from the consultancy firm Kantar Worldpanel. It is followed by Carrefour (14.7 points) and Aldi (12.4 points).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_3_Organic_and_sustainable_products.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Top_3_in_organic_products_sales+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863641,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Wood and derivatives purchase policy+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Wood_and_derivatives_purchase_policy+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Wood and derivatives purchase policy",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.4 Wood and paper\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we intend to make known and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the recycled and sustainable origin of the raw material of forest origin used both in the elements used by their customers and collaborators (paper bags, material advertising and office), as in the assortment of own brand products on the shelves.<br>\nThese policies are summarized in the following 3 areas of action in terms of the sustainable use of wood, paper and cardboard:<br>\n<br>\n- Certifications that guarantee the sustainability of these raw materials (FSC, PEFC, ECOLABEL, ..)<br>\n- Recycled Paper / Cardboard / Wood (PCM)<br>\n- Initiatives of reduction (less quantity of paper / wood used), of replacement (by digitization actions such as digital purchase receipt, ...) or elimination (such as the non-distribution of paper brochures)",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_4_Wood_and_paper.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Wood_and_derivatives_purchase_policy+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863649,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Use of sustainable paper in stores and offices+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Use_of_sustainable_paper_in_stores_and_offices+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Use of sustainable paper in stores and offices",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.4 Wood and paper\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we intend to make known and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the recycled and sustainable origin of the raw material of forest origin used both in the elements used by their customers and collaborators (paper bags, material advertising and office), as in the assortment of own brand products on the shelves.<br>\nThese policies are summarized in the following 3 areas of action in terms of the sustainable use of wood, paper and cardboard:<br>\n<br>\n- Certifications that guarantee the sustainability of these raw materials (FSC, PEFC, ECOLABEL, ..)<br>\n- Recycled Paper / Cardboard / Wood (PCM)<br>\n- Initiatives of reduction (less quantity of paper / wood used), of replacement (by digitization actions such as digital purchase receipt, ...) or elimination (such as the non-distribution of paper brochures)",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_4_Wood_and_paper.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Use_of_sustainable_paper_in_stores_and_offices+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863661,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Reduction of paper consumption+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_paper_consumption+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Reduction of paper consumption",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.4 Wood and paper\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we intend to make known and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the recycled and sustainable origin of the raw material of forest origin used both in the elements used by their customers and collaborators (paper bags, material advertising and office), as in the assortment of own brand products on the shelves.<br>\nThese policies are summarized in the following 3 areas of action in terms of the sustainable use of wood, paper and cardboard:<br>\n<br>\n- Certifications that guarantee the sustainability of these raw materials (FSC, PEFC, ECOLABEL, ..)<br>\n- Recycled Paper / Cardboard / Wood (PCM)<br>\n- Initiatives of reduction (less quantity of paper / wood used), of replacement (by digitization actions such as digital purchase receipt, ...) or elimination (such as the non-distribution of paper brochures)",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_4_Wood_and_paper.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Reduction_of_paper_consumption+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863669,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable paper and wood in all packaging and products+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_paper_and_wood_in_all_packaging_and_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Sustainable paper and wood in all packaging and products",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.4 Wood and paper\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we intend to make known and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the recycled and sustainable origin of the raw material of forest origin used both in the elements used by their customers and collaborators (paper bags, material advertising and office), as in the assortment of own brand products on the shelves.<br>\nThese policies are summarized in the following 3 areas of action in terms of the sustainable use of wood, paper and cardboard:<br>\n<br>\n- Certifications that guarantee the sustainability of these raw materials (FSC, PEFC, ECOLABEL, ..)<br>\n- Recycled Paper / Cardboard / Wood (PCM)<br>\n- Initiatives of reduction (less quantity of paper / wood used), of replacement (by digitization actions such as digital purchase receipt, ...) or elimination (such as the non-distribution of paper brochures)",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_4_Wood_and_paper.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_paper_and_wood_in_all_packaging_and_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863677,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable paper and wood in some packaging and products+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_paper_and_wood_in_some_packaging_and_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Sustainable paper and wood in some packaging and products",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.4 Wood and paper\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we intend to make known and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the recycled and sustainable origin of the raw material of forest origin used both in the elements used by their customers and collaborators (paper bags, material advertising and office), as in the assortment of own brand products on the shelves.<br>\nThese policies are summarized in the following 3 areas of action in terms of the sustainable use of wood, paper and cardboard:<br>\n<br>\n- Certifications that guarantee the sustainability of these raw materials (FSC, PEFC, ECOLABEL, ..)<br>\n- Recycled Paper / Cardboard / Wood (PCM)<br>\n- Initiatives of reduction (less quantity of paper / wood used), of replacement (by digitization actions such as digital purchase receipt, ...) or elimination (such as the non-distribution of paper brochures)",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_4_Wood_and_paper.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_paper_and_wood_in_some_packaging_and_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863685,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Requirements to suppliers of wood and derivatives+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Requirements_to_suppliers_of_wood_and_derivatives+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Requirements to suppliers of wood and derivatives",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.4 Wood and paper\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we intend to make known and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the recycled and sustainable origin of the raw material of forest origin used both in the elements used by their customers and collaborators (paper bags, material advertising and office), as in the assortment of own brand products on the shelves.<br>\nThese policies are summarized in the following 3 areas of action in terms of the sustainable use of wood, paper and cardboard:<br>\n<br>\n- Certifications that guarantee the sustainability of these raw materials (FSC, PEFC, ECOLABEL, ..)<br>\n- Recycled Paper / Cardboard / Wood (PCM)<br>\n- Initiatives of reduction (less quantity of paper / wood used), of replacement (by digitization actions such as digital purchase receipt, ...) or elimination (such as the non-distribution of paper brochures)",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_4_Wood_and_paper.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Requirements_to_suppliers_of_wood_and_derivatives+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863693,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Innovative initiatives on sustainable use of paper+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Innovative_initiatives_on_sustainable_use_of_paper+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Innovative initiatives on sustainable use of paper",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.4 Wood and paper\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we intend to make known and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the recycled and sustainable origin of the raw material of forest origin used both in the elements used by their customers and collaborators (paper bags, material advertising and office), as in the assortment of own brand products on the shelves.<br>\nThese policies are summarized in the following 3 areas of action in terms of the sustainable use of wood, paper and cardboard:<br>\n<br>\n- Certifications that guarantee the sustainability of these raw materials (FSC, PEFC, ECOLABEL, ..)<br>\n- Recycled Paper / Cardboard / Wood (PCM)<br>\n- Initiatives of reduction (less quantity of paper / wood used), of replacement (by digitization actions such as digital purchase receipt, ...) or elimination (such as the non-distribution of paper brochures)",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_4_Wood_and_paper.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Innovative_initiatives_on_sustainable_use_of_paper+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863701,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Responsible palm oil policy+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Responsible_palm_oil_policy+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Responsible palm oil policy",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.5 Monocultures\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main retailers in Spain regarding the use of monocultures (palm oil, soy and cotton) in their own-brand products and their recognition of their environmental impact.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_5_Monocultures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Responsible_palm_oil_policy+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863709,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable palm oil in all hygiene and cosmetic products+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_palm_oil_in_all_hygiene_and_cosmetic_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Sustainable palm oil in all hygiene and cosmetic products",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.5 Monocultures\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main retailers in Spain regarding the use of monocultures (palm oil, soy and cotton) in their own-brand products and their recognition of their environmental impact.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_5_Monocultures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_palm_oil_in_all_hygiene_and_cosmetic_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863721,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable palm oil in 50% of hygiene and cosmetic products+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_palm_oil_in_50_of_hygiene_and_cosmetic_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Sustainable palm oil in 50% of hygiene and cosmetic products",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.5 Monocultures\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main retailers in Spain regarding the use of monocultures (palm oil, soy and cotton) in their own-brand products and their recognition of their environmental impact.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_5_Monocultures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_palm_oil_in_50_of_hygiene_and_cosmetic_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863729,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable palm oil in all food products+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_palm_oil_in_all_food_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Sustainable palm oil in all food products",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.5 Monocultures\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main retailers in Spain regarding the use of monocultures (palm oil, soy and cotton) in their own-brand products and their recognition of their environmental impact.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_5_Monocultures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_palm_oil_in_all_food_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863737,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Elimination of palm oil in some products+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_palm_oil_in_some_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Elimination of palm oil in some products",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.5 Monocultures\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main retailers in Spain regarding the use of monocultures (palm oil, soy and cotton) in their own-brand products and their recognition of their environmental impact.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_5_Monocultures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_palm_oil_in_some_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863745,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Responsible policy on the use of soy in animal feed+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Responsible_policy_on_the_use_of_soy_in_animal_feed+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Responsible policy on the use of soy in animal feed",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.5 Monocultures\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main retailers in Spain regarding the use of monocultures (palm oil, soy and cotton) in their own-brand products and their recognition of their environmental impact.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_5_Monocultures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Responsible_policy_on_the_use_of_soy_in_animal_feed+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863753,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+The animal feed of 100% of products is with sustainable soy+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+The_animal_feed_of_100_of_products_is_with_sustainable_soy+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "The animal feed of 100% of products is with sustainable soy",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.5 Monocultures\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main retailers in Spain regarding the use of monocultures (palm oil, soy and cotton) in their own-brand products and their recognition of their environmental impact.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_5_Monocultures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+The_animal_feed_of_100_of_products_is_with_sustainable_soy+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863761,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+The animal feed of 50% of products is with sustainable soy+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+The_animal_feed_of_50_of_products_is_with_sustainable_soy+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "The animal feed of 50% of products is with sustainable soy",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.5 Monocultures\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main retailers in Spain regarding the use of monocultures (palm oil, soy and cotton) in their own-brand products and their recognition of their environmental impact.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_5_Monocultures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+The_animal_feed_of_50_of_products_is_with_sustainable_soy+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863769,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+The animal feed of some products is with sustainable soy+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+The_animal_feed_of_some_products_is_with_sustainable_soy+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "The animal feed of some products is with sustainable soy",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.5 Monocultures\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main retailers in Spain regarding the use of monocultures (palm oil, soy and cotton) in their own-brand products and their recognition of their environmental impact.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_5_Monocultures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+The_animal_feed_of_some_products_is_with_sustainable_soy+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863777,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Sustainable soy in all vegetarian products+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_soy_in_all_vegetarian_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Sustainable soy in all vegetarian products",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.5 Monocultures\"\"<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main retailers in Spain regarding the use of monocultures (palm oil, soy and cotton) in their own-brand products and their recognition of their environmental impact.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_5_Monocultures.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Sustainable_soy_in_all_vegetarian_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863789,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Absence of GMOs in 100% of own brand animal feed+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Absence_of_GMOs_in_100_of_own_brand_animal_feed+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Absence of GMOs in 100% of own brand animal feed",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.6 Genetic modification\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the performance of the main distributors in Spain in relation to the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the animal feed of their own-brand products.<br>\nWe are not referring to the distributors' fresh or packaged finished products, which by law must not contain GMOs. In this respect, statements such as \"No products of our brands contain genetically modified organisms (GMOs)\" are meaningless. What we evaluate is the animal feed of fresh products (meat, poultry, fish,...). Excluded from this section would be certified \"organic\" products, which by law should not be exposed to genetically modified feed.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_6_Genetic_modification.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Absence_of_GMOs_in_100_of_own_brand_animal_feed+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863801,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Objective of eliminating GMOs from own brand+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Objective_of_eliminating_GMOs_from_own_brand+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Objective of eliminating GMOs from own brand",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.6 Genetic modification\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the performance of the main distributors in Spain in relation to the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the animal feed of their own-brand products.<br>\nWe are not referring to the distributors' fresh or packaged finished products, which by law must not contain GMOs. In this respect, statements such as \"No products of our brands contain genetically modified organisms (GMOs)\" are meaningless. What we evaluate is the animal feed of fresh products (meat, poultry, fish,...). Excluded from this section would be certified \"organic\" products, which by law should not be exposed to genetically modified feed.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_6_Genetic_modification.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Objective_of_eliminating_GMOs_from_own_brand+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863809,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+100% certified coffee+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_certified_coffee+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "100% certified coffee",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.7 Cocoa, coffee and tea\"\"<br>\n With this metric, we aim to show and compare the performance of leading retailers in Spain in sourcing the so-called high-risk crops of cocoa, coffee and tea for their own brand.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_7_Cocoa_coffee_and_tea.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_certified_coffee+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863817,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+100% certified teas and infusions+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_certified_teas_and_infusions+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "100% certified teas and infusions",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.7 Cocoa, coffee and tea\"\"<br>\n With this metric, we aim to show and compare the performance of leading retailers in Spain in sourcing the so-called high-risk crops of cocoa, coffee and tea for their own brand.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_7_Cocoa_coffee_and_tea.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_certified_teas_and_infusions+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863825,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+100% certified cocoa+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_certified_cocoa+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "100% certified cocoa",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.7 Cocoa, coffee and tea\"\"<br>\n With this metric, we aim to show and compare the performance of leading retailers in Spain in sourcing the so-called high-risk crops of cocoa, coffee and tea for their own brand.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 22,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_7_Cocoa_coffee_and_tea.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+100_certified_cocoa+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863833,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+50% certified coffee+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_certified_coffee+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "50% certified coffee",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.7 Cocoa, coffee and tea\"\"<br>\n With this metric, we aim to show and compare the performance of leading retailers in Spain in sourcing the so-called high-risk crops of cocoa, coffee and tea for their own brand.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_7_Cocoa_coffee_and_tea.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_certified_coffee+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863841,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+50% certified teas and infusions+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_certified_teas_and_infusions+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "50% certified teas and infusions",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.7 Cocoa, coffee and tea\"\"<br>\n With this metric, we aim to show and compare the performance of leading retailers in Spain in sourcing the so-called high-risk crops of cocoa, coffee and tea for their own brand.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_7_Cocoa_coffee_and_tea.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_certified_teas_and_infusions+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863849,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+50% certified cocoa+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_certified_cocoa+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "50% certified cocoa",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.7 Cocoa, coffee and tea\"\"<br>\n With this metric, we aim to show and compare the performance of leading retailers in Spain in sourcing the so-called high-risk crops of cocoa, coffee and tea for their own brand.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 22,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_7_Cocoa_coffee_and_tea.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+50_certified_cocoa+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863861,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Support projects for local cocoa, coffee or tea producers+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Support_projects_for_local_cocoa_coffee_or_tea_producers+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Support projects for local cocoa, coffee or tea producers",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"5.7 Cocoa, coffee and tea\"\"<br>\n With this metric, we aim to show and compare the performance of leading retailers in Spain in sourcing the so-called high-risk crops of cocoa, coffee and tea for their own brand.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_7_Cocoa_coffee_and_tea.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Support_projects_for_local_cocoa_coffee_or_tea_producers+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863869,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Policy on Animal Welfare+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Policy_on_Animal_Welfare+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Policy on Animal Welfare",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Policy_on_Animal_Welfare+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863877,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Animal welfare requirements for all products and species+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_requirements_for_all_products_and_species+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Animal welfare requirements for all products and species",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_requirements_for_all_products_and_species+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863885,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Target of Animal Welfare requirements for all products and species in 2025+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Target_of_Animal_Welfare_requirements_for_all_products_and_species_in_2025+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Target of Animal Welfare requirements for all products and species in 2025",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 22,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Target_of_Animal_Welfare_requirements_for_all_products_and_species_in_2025+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863893,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Animal welfare requirements for 50% of the products and species+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_requirements_for_50_of_the_products_and_species+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Animal welfare requirements for 50% of the products and species",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_requirements_for_50_of_the_products_and_species+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863901,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Animal welfare requirements in some products and species+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_requirements_in_some_products_and_species+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Animal welfare requirements in some products and species",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_requirements_in_some_products_and_species+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863913,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Responsible use of antibiotics+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Responsible_use_of_antibiotics+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Responsible use of antibiotics",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Responsible_use_of_antibiotics+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863921,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Animal welfare policies for all non-food products+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_policies_for_all_non_food_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Animal welfare policies for all non-food products",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_policies_for_all_non_food_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863929,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Animal welfare policies for some non-food products+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_policies_for_some_non_food_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Animal welfare policies for some non-food products",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Animal_welfare_policies_for_some_non_food_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863937,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Elimination of \"cage eggs\"+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_cage_eggs+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Elimination of \"cage eggs\"",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_cage_eggs+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863945,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Goal of elimination of \"cage eggs\" in 2025+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Goal_of_elimination_of_cage_eggs_in_2025+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Goal of elimination of \"cage eggs\" in 2025",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Goal_of_elimination_of_cage_eggs_in_2025+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863953,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Elimination of own brand \"cage eggs\"+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_own_brand_cage_eggs+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Elimination of own brand \"cage eggs\"",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_own_brand_cage_eggs+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863961,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Elimination of own brand \"cage eggs\" in 2023+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_own_brand_cage_eggs_in_2023+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Elimination of own brand \"cage eggs\" in 2023",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Elimination_of_own_brand_cage_eggs_in_2023+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863973,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Ingredients of private label products without cage eggs+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Ingredients_of_private_label_products_without_cage_eggs+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Ingredients of private label products without cage eggs",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Ingredients_of_private_label_products_without_cage_eggs+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863981,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Ingredients of private label products without cage eggs in 2025+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Ingredients_of_private_label_products_without_cage_eggs_in_2025+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Ingredients of private label products without cage eggs in 2025",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Ingredients_of_private_label_products_without_cage_eggs_in_2025+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863989,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Control to avoid premature death of male chickens+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Control_to_avoid_premature_death_of_male_chickens+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Control to avoid premature death of male chickens",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Control_to_avoid_premature_death_of_male_chickens+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6863997,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Campaigns to moderate meat consumption+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Campaigns_to_moderate_meat_consumption+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Campaigns to moderate meat consumption",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Campaigns_to_moderate_meat_consumption+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6864005,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Own range of organic products of animal origin+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Own_range_of_organic_products_of_animal_origin+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Own range of organic products of animal origin",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Own_range_of_organic_products_of_animal_origin+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6864013,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Own range of vegetarian or vegan products+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Own_range_of_vegetarian_or_vegan_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Own range of vegetarian or vegan products",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Own_range_of_vegetarian_or_vegan_products+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6864021,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Promotion of Animal Welfare+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_Animal_Welfare+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Promotion of Animal Welfare",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.1 Animal welfare policies and management\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Promotion_of_Animal_Welfare+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6864033,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+All products with Animal Welfare certification+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+All_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "All products with Animal Welfare certification",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.2 Animal welfare certifications\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by leading retailers in Spain in their efforts to certify the animal welfare of their own-brand products.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_2_Animal_welfare_certifications.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+All_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6864041,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Most products with Animal Welfare certification+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Most_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Most products with Animal Welfare certification",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.2 Animal welfare certifications\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by leading retailers in Spain in their efforts to certify the animal welfare of their own-brand products.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_2_Animal_welfare_certifications.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Most_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6864049,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Relevant number of products with Animal Welfare certification+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Relevant_number_of_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Relevant number of products with Animal Welfare certification",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.2 Animal welfare certifications\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by leading retailers in Spain in their efforts to certify the animal welfare of their own-brand products.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_2_Animal_welfare_certifications.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Relevant_number_of_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6864057,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Some products with Animal Welfare certification+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Some_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Some products with Animal Welfare certification",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.2 Animal welfare certifications\"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by leading retailers in Spain in their efforts to certify the animal welfare of their own-brand products.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_2_Animal_welfare_certifications.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Some_products_with_Animal_Welfare_certification+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6864082,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Demands on Animal Welfare to non private label suppliers+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Demands_on_Animal_Welfare_to_non_private_label_suppliers+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Demands on Animal Welfare to non private label suppliers",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.3 Animal welfare in the supply chain \"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the efforts of the main distributors in Spain in applying their animal welfare policy to their supply chain, focusing mainly on :<br>\n<br>\n- carrying out audits and inspections of major suppliers<br>\n- support and training of suppliers on animal welfare<br>\n- animal welfare requirements for non-branded suppliers",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_3_Animal_welfare_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Demands_on_Animal_Welfare_to_non_private_label_suppliers+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6864090,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Support and training on Animal Welfare for suppliers+Research Group Eticonsum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Support_and_training_on_Animal_Welfare_for_suppliers+Research_Group_Eticonsum.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Support and training on Animal Welfare for suppliers",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.3 Animal welfare in the supply chain \"\"<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the efforts of the main distributors in Spain in applying their animal welfare policy to their supply chain, focusing mainly on :<br>\n<br>\n- carrying out audits and inspections of major suppliers<br>\n- support and training of suppliers on animal welfare<br>\n- animal welfare requirements for non-branded suppliers",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Unknown\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Yes\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_3_Animal_welfare_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Support_and_training_on_Animal_Welfare_for_suppliers+Research_Group_Eticonsum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6891907,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+1. Climate Change",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_Climate_Change.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "1. Climate Change",
      "question": "What is the company's score according to its carbon emissions management performance disclosed in its reports?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta métrica forma parte del estudio de investigación de Eticonsum sobre la evaluación de las empresas del sector Retail Food en materia medioambiental, social y ética. </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Eticonsum es una agencia de investigación de mercado sin fines de lucro especializada en desempeño corporativo ESG (medioambiental, social, gobernanza) aplicado al conocimiento del consumidor. </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Investigamos y analizamos el mercado ético del sector de bienes de consumo y evaluamos el desempeño ambiental y social de las empresas con el fin de ayudar tanto a los consumidores conscientes a decidir según sus valores, como a las empresas a competir en reputación ética.</span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Las empresas son evaluadas en base a toda su información publicada sobre desempeño extra-financiero, entre los que se encuentran sus Informes de Responsabilidad Social Corporativa, Informes Anuales, Códigos de Conducta, Informes de Sostenibilidad, Informes de Estado de Información No Financiera (NFRD/EINF) de acuerdo con la Ley 11 /. 2018, etc..., además de estudios de evaluación socio-ambiental de otras organizaciones.</span></span><span style=\"font-size: 8pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif;\"><br></span><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Creemos que estos informes, con todo su potencial de mejora, ofrecen una gran cantidad de información válida y reveladora sobre el desempeño y transparencia de las empresas en materia ambiental, social y ética y representan hoy en día su principal medio de divulgación y herramienta de verificación disponible para sus partes interesadas. </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Nuestra misión en este sentido es democratizar el acceso e interpretación de estos informes e intentar traducirlos </span></span><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">en un esquema de indicadores comparables que, complementado con otros indicadores menos estandarizados y específicos para cada sector de actividad, permite a cualquier usuario desarrollar su propio ranking en función de sus prioridades de evaluación eco-social </span></span><br><br></p>\r\n<p>En este apartado evaluamos cómo miden, gestionan y publican las cadenas de supermercados sus emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero (GEI) y establecen políticas y compromisos para reducirlas. Analizamos igualmente sus políticas y desempeño en cuanto a la elección de proveedores locales y de transporte más sostenible tanto pesado como de última milla, ya sea en su propia flota o subcontratado.</p>\r\n<p>En resumen, con esta métrica pretendemos evaluar el compromiso de forma específica de las compañías para luchar contra el cambio climático y la correcta divulgación de sus datos y acciones en materia de :</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li> Emisiones de CO2, tanto directas como indirectas</li>\r\n<li> Intensidad de Emisiones</li>\r\n<li> Reducción y/o compensación de emisiones</li>\r\n<li> Oferta de producto local</li>\r\n<li> Logística sostenible</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<h5><strong>Emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero (GEI)</strong></h5>\r\n<p>Las emisiones de GEI son un importante contribuyente al cambio climático y se rigen por la 'Convención Marco sobre el Cambio Climático' de las Naciones Unidas (ONU) y el subsiguiente 'Protocolo de Kioto' de la ONU. Incluyen ;Dióxido de carbono (CO2), Metano (CH4) , Óxido nitroso (N2O, Hidrofluorocarbonos (HFC) ,Perfluorocarbonos (PFC), Hexafluoruro de azufre (SF6), Trifluoruro de nitrógeno (NF3)</p>\r\n<p>El Protocolo de GEI ha establecido una clasificación de emisiones de GEI llamada 'Alcance': Alcance 1, Alcance 2 y Alcance 3. El estándar de emisiones de GEI publicado por la Organización Internacional de Normalización (ISO), 'ISO 14064', representa estas clasificaciones de Alcance con los siguientes términos:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Emisiones directas de GEI = Alcance I</li>\r\n<li>Emisiones indirectas de GEI por energía = Alcance 2</li>\r\n<li>Otras emisiones indirectas de GEI = Alcance 3</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> Las reducciones en la emisión de contaminantes regulados conducen a mejores condiciones de salud para los trabajadores y las comunidades locales y pueden mejorar las relaciones con las partes interesadas afectadas.</p>\r\n<p>Fuente: globalreporting.org</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Use of Carbon Offsets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6519871",
          "weight": "15"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6915971",
          "weight": "10"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6891916",
          "weight": "14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6891925",
          "weight": "15"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6891934",
          "weight": "15"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6891944",
          "weight": "15"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6891953",
          "weight": "16"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Environmental_Performance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_Climate_Change+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6891916,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 3",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_3_Indirect_GHG_Emissions_Scope_3.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "1.3 Indirect GHG Emissions Scope 3",
      "question": "How does the company measure, publish and reduce the annual carbon footprint of its indirect emissions (Scope 3)? .",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of Eticonsum's research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector on environmental, social and ethical issues.   <br>\nEticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialising in ESG (environment, social, governance) corporate performance applied to consumer insights. <br>\nWe research and analyse the ethical market in the FMCG sector and assess the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n<br>\nThis question is linked to GRI Standard 305-3 Other gross indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3).<br>\n<br>\nScope 3 emissions refer to emissions from sources that are not owned or controlled by the company. <br>\nIn the case of retailers, examples of Scope 3 emissions sources would be :<br>\n<br>\n- Water consumption<br>\n- Waste management<br>\n- Business travel by road and air<br>\n- Customer travel to shops<br>\n- Diesel production consumed in road transport in logistics.<br>\n- Paper consumption in headquarters, advertising and magazines.<br>\n<br>\nThere is considerable heterogeneity in how companies report these types of emissions, the measurement and publication of which is not mandatory under the GHG Protocol (\"Companies must account and report separately for scopes 1 and 2, as a minimum), nor is it required by LAW 11/2018, in fact many companies in the retail sector do not publish at least some of their sources. <br>\n<br>\nHowever, although they are more difficult to quantify and control, the emissions included in this scope in many cases account for the vast majority of a company's total emissions, as in the retail sector.  According to the GHG Protocol Guidebook, Ikea's emissions from customer trips to its shops accounted for 66% of its total emissions inventory, according to the company's own data.<br>\n<br>\n In this sense, we value in this section the maximum level of detail in terms of their measurement, registration and publication, as well as all the efforts and actions of the companies to avoid and reduce them.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6862358",
          "weight": "19"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862330",
          "weight": "19"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862350",
          "weight": "19"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862366",
          "weight": "12"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862374",
          "weight": "12"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862342",
          "weight": "19"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_Climate_Change.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_3_Indirect_GHG_Emissions_Scope_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6891925,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+1.4 GHG emissions intensity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_4_GHG_emissions_intensity.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "1.4 GHG emissions intensity",
      "question": "What is the relative degree of pollution of the company according to the intensity of its GHG emissions (Scope 1 and 2)?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of Eticonsum's research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector on environmental, social and ethical issues.   <br>\nEticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialising in ESG (environment, social, governance) corporate performance applied to consumer insight. <br>\nWe research and analyse the ethical market in the FMCG sector and assess the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n<br>\nGHG emissions intensity is a key indicator when monitoring the real relative impact of a company's carbon footprint. We therefore value companies including this indicator in their reporting, albeit with different denominators to the one we have chosen. <br>\nThe measure we have selected to assess the intensity of GHG emissions in the retail sector in a homogeneous way is TnCO2eq per m2. <br>\n<br>\nHowever, few companies measure their intensity in relation to their surface area, so in this case we have calculated this indicator based on their total own emissions (scope 1 and 2) and the published sales surface area in m2 (on the basis of which the company has calculated its emissions and supply consumption).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6862418",
          "weight": "16"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862426",
          "weight": "16"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862382",
          "weight": "20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862394",
          "weight": "16"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862402",
          "weight": "16"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862410",
          "weight": "16"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_Climate_Change.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_4_GHG_emissions_intensity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6891934,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+1.5 Reduction of GHG emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_5_Reduction_of_GHG_emissions.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "1.5 Reduction of GHG emissions",
      "question": "How has the company reduced or offset emissions from its 'own operations' (Scope 1 and 2)?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of Eticonsum's research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector on environmental, social and ethical issues.   <br>\nEticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialising in ESG (environment, social, governance) corporate performance applied to consumer insights. <br>\nWe research and analyse the ethical market in the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n<br>\n With this metric, based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) \"Content 305-5 GHG Emissions Reduction\", we aim to assess the performance of companies in reducing their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.",
      "methodology": "This question is based on an absolute indicator such as the total emissions in Tn of CO2 eq. From an ecological point of view, the absolute indicators are only a main focus, since they represent the consumption of resources by the company and its emission of polluting substances (CO2 emissions, amount of waste in Tn, energy consumption in Kw / h) and provide the basis for setting environmental objectives and goals.<br>\n However, in order to evaluate the efficiency of the company in terms of reducing emissions in this case, these absolute indicators must be examined in proportion to valid reference figures such as the m2 of surface as we do in our previous metric \"\" 1.4 Intensity of GHG emissions \"\" qualifying the reduction of the emissions ratio based on the m2 of total sales area of ??the company<br>\n<br>\nThe relative indicators, therefore, demonstrate the environmental performance of a company in relation to its size or production capacity",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Use of Carbon Offsets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6862462",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862434",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862446",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862454",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862470",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862478",
          "weight": "16.67"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_Climate_Change.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_5_Reduction_of_GHG_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6891944,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+1.6 Local suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_6_Local_suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "1.6 Local suppliers",
      "question": "What is the performance of the company regarding the choice of local suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of Eticonsum's research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector on environmental, social and ethical issues.   <br>\nEticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialising in ESG (environment, social, governance) corporate performance applied to consumer insights. <br>\nWe research and analyse the ethical market in the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n<br>\nWith this metric, based on GRI 204-1 Proportion of expenditure on local suppliers, we assess the local sourcing of products offered by retailers, especially fresh produce. <br>\nThese products are likely to have the greatest environmental impact due to delocalisation because of their sales volume: in 2016, according to Femex data, in Spain we imported 1.6 million tonnes of fruit and 1.2 million tonnes of vegetables. Organisations such as Greenpeace warn of the CO2 emissions involved in this process (transport, cold storage...). Specifically, a review of studies carried out by Engineering Without Borders attributed between 15% and 20% of the greenhouse gas emissions produced by the agricultural industry to processing, packaging and transport.  <br>\n<br>\nFurthermore, the import of fruit and vegetables from countries outside the EU means that crops are often treated with pesticides that are not authorised for use in the EU, banned because of their risks to health and the environment. <br>\n<br>\nA policy of proximity on the part of companies when choosing their suppliers of products, as well as supporting local development at market and community level, contributes significantly to the reduction of emissions by shortening the transport routes for goods. In the case of supermarkets, it is particularly relevant that certain products such as fruit and vegetables are brought from remote places such as South America, the Maghreb, South Africa, etc., with Spain being the main market garden in Europe. <br>\n<br>\nThe ideal situation in this sense is for supermarkets to prioritise purchases in Spain and only import produce from other markets if it is not available in the country (or any of its specific varieties which are in high demand by the consumer), or if its quality is not adequate due to circumstances related to the harvest.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6862486",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862498",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862506",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862514",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862522",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862530",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862538",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862550",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862558",
          "weight": "11.11"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_Climate_Change.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_6_Local_suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6891953,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+1.7 Sustainable logistics",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_7_Sustainable_logistics.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "1.7 Sustainable logistics",
      "question": "What is the performance of the company in terms of sustainable transport ?.",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of Eticonsum's research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector on environmental, social and ethical issues.   <br>\nEticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialising in ESG (environment, social, governance) corporate performance applied to consumer insights. <br>\nWe research and analyse the ethical market in the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n<br>\nThe responsibility of shopping centres and in particular supermarkets for pollutant emissions lies mainly in their large logistical activity.<br>\n In Europe, lorries account for 22% of road transport emissions, although they account for only 2% of the vehicles on the roads. The EU recently set a 30% reduction target for pollutant emissions from new trucks from 2030, with an average target of 15% in 2025 compared to the levels recorded in 2019.<br>\n<br>\nIn this section, we value agile and responsible logistics, capable of adapting to changes and incorporating environmental aspects in its strategy.<br>\n<br>\nThe means of logistical transport that we consider in this metric is generally land transport, both in our own or subcontracted fleets, from the headquarters to the point of sale and the last mile. However, we will also consider, where appropriate, means of transport such as air and sea for retailers that cover business lines with longer supply chains such as textiles.<br>\n<br>\nWith regard to the use of alternative energy vehicles (AEVs), our assessment is limited to those for which there is more consensus in the field of heavy transport and at the regulatory level, such as electric vehicles and the most advanced version of the Euro Law (EURO VI for heavy vehicles or EURO 6 for light vehicles)",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6862566",
          "weight": "10"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862574",
          "weight": "5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862582",
          "weight": "5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862590",
          "weight": "10"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862602",
          "weight": "5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862610",
          "weight": "10"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862618",
          "weight": "10"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862634",
          "weight": "20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862626",
          "weight": "10"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862642",
          "weight": "15"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_Climate_Change.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_7_Sustainable_logistics+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6891962,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+2. Waste and Materials",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_Waste_and_Materials.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "2. Waste and Materials",
      "question": "What is the company's score according to the waste management performance disclosed in its reports?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta métrica forma parte del estudio de investigación de Eticonsum sobre la evaluación de las empresas del sector Retail Food en cuestiones medioambientales, sociales y éticas. </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Eticonsum es una agencia de investigación de mercado sin fines de lucro que se especializa en el desempeño corporativo de ESG (medio ambiente, social, gobernanza) aplicado a los conocimientos del consumidor. </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Investigamos y analizamos el mercado ético en el sector de bienes de consumo y evaluamos el desempeño ambiental y social de las empresas para ayudar tanto a los consumidores conscientes a decidir según sus valores como a las empresas a competir en reputación ética. </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Los principales residuos que se producen en el sector FMCG en sus hipermercados, supermercados, centros comerciales y plataformas logísticas proceden de: </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">- Envases secundarios (cartones de embalaje de productos, plásticos de embalaje y poliestireno);</span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">- Residuos orgánicos de alimentos caducados o sobras del procesamiento de productos en los talleres de las tiendas; </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">- En menor medida, chatarra y madera (palets y cajas). </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Sin olvidar la principal fuente de residuos que es la distribución de millones de productos envasados, principalmente a base de plástico. </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">La Fundación Ellen MacArthur advierte que si seguimos consumiendo plástico como lo hacemos hoy, en 2050, por cada kilo de pescado habrá más de 1 kg de plástico. </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">La Global Footprint Network estima que la población mundial utiliza 1,5 veces los recursos renovables del planeta cada año.</span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Por lo tanto, uno de los mayores desafíos colectivos e individuales del siglo XXI es evitar el desperdicio y, al mismo tiempo, reducir la (s) cantidad (s) de energía (s) necesaria para fabricar bienes y tratar los residuos que generan.</span></span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6891971",
          "weight": "20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6891980",
          "weight": "15"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6891989",
          "weight": "10"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6891998",
          "weight": "7"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892007",
          "weight": "16"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892016",
          "weight": "4"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892025",
          "weight": "18"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892034",
          "weight": "10"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Environmental_Performance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_Waste_and_Materials+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6891971,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+2.1 Waste reduction and prevention",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_1_Waste_reduction_and_prevention.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "2.1 Waste reduction and prevention",
      "question": "How does the company reduce and prevent the waste it generates?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta métrica forma parte del estudio de investigación de Eticonsum sobre la evaluación de las empresas del sector Retail Food en cuestiones medioambientales, sociales y éticas. </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Eticonsum es una agencia de investigación de mercado sin fines de lucro que se especializa en el desempeño corporativo de ESG (medio ambiente, social, gobernanza) aplicado a los conocimientos del consumidor. </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Investigamos y analizamos el mercado ético en el sector de bienes de consumo y evaluamos el desempeño ambiental y social de las empresas para ayudar tanto a los consumidores conscientes a decidir según sus valores como a las empresas a competir en reputación ética.</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span>Con esta métrica pretendemos evaluar los esfuerzos de las compañías en materia de reducción y prevención de residuos analizando las acciones concretas de sus políticas de residuos, sus certificaciones de \"residuo cero\"</span> <span>y sus porcentajes de disminución de deshechos generados respecto al año anterior.</span> <span>Premiamos igualmente a aquellas empresas que no distribuyen material publicitario en papel</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6862654",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862662",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6921531",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862670",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862686",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862694",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862702",
          "weight": "14.29"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_Waste_and_Materials.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_1_Waste_reduction_and_prevention+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6891980,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+2.2 Performance and recycling policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_2_Performance_and_recycling_policy.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "2.2 Performance and recycling policy",
      "question": "What are the company's policies and performance around recycling and waste recovery?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta métrica forma parte del estudio de investigación de Eticonsum sobre la evaluación de las empresas del sector Retail Food en cuestiones medioambientales, sociales y éticas. </span></span></span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Eticonsum es una agencia de investigación de mercado sin fines de lucro que se especializa en el desempeño corporativo de ESG (medio ambiente, social, gobernanza) aplicado a los conocimientos del consumidor. </span></span></span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Investigamos y analizamos el mercado ético en el sector de bienes de consumo y evaluamos el desempeño ambiental y social de las empresas para ayudar tanto a los consumidores a decidir según sus valores como a las empresas a competir en reputación ética.</span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Con esta métrica pretendemos evaluar los esfuerzos de las compañías en materia de reciclaje y valorización de residuos analizando:</span></span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Sus tasas anuales de recuperación de residuos, </span></span></span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">La gestión con respecto al reciclaje del cartón, plástico, papel y madera generados en sus instalaciones por gestores autorizados, </span></span></span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">La disposición en sus establecimientos de puntos de recogida de materiales tóxicos o de reciclaje postconsumo.</span></span></span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Por último, sus iniciativas en relación al reciclaje de residuos de alto impacto como Bricks, cápsulas de café, etc ...</span></span></span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6862714",
          "weight": "14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862722",
          "weight": "14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862730",
          "weight": "14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862738",
          "weight": "14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862746",
          "weight": "20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862754",
          "weight": "14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862766",
          "weight": "10"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_Waste_and_Materials.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_2_Performance_and_recycling_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6891989,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+2.3 Publication of waste generated",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_3_Publication_of_waste_generated.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "2.3 Publication of waste generated",
      "question": "How does the company measure and publish its waste management? .",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of Eticonsum's research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector in terms of environmental, social and ethical issues.   <br>\nEticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialising in ESG (environment, social, governance) corporate performance applied to consumer insight. <br>\nWe research and analyse the ethical market in the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"GRI 306-2 Waste by Type and Disposal Method\" standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish the waste they generate based on the common thread of our assessment methodology: What is not measured cannot be improved. What is good that is not published does not exist",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6862774",
          "weight": "22"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862782",
          "weight": "22"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862790",
          "weight": "22"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862798",
          "weight": "12"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862806",
          "weight": "22"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_Waste_and_Materials.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_3_Publication_of_waste_generated+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6891998,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+2.4 Waste reduction targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_4_Waste_reduction_targets.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "2.4 Waste reduction targets",
      "question": "What are the objectives of the company in terms of waste reduction?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta métrica forma parte del estudio de investigación de Eticonsum sobre la evaluación de las empresas del sector Retail Food en cuestiones medioambientales, sociales y éticas. </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Eticonsum es una agencia de investigación de mercado sin fines de lucro que se especializa en el desempeño corporativo de ESG (medio ambiente, social, gobernanza) aplicado a los conocimientos del consumidor. </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Investigamos y analizamos el mercado ético en el sector de bienes de consumo y evaluamos el desempeño ambiental y social de las empresas para ayudar tanto a los consumidores conscientes a decidir según sus valores como a las empresas a competir en reputación ética. </span></span><br><br><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Con esta métrica pretendemos evaluar los esfuerzos de las compañías en materia de reducción de residuos con objetivos concretos orientados a la máxima aspiración en este sentido que es alcanzar el \"residuo cero\" o al menos una disminución de un 20% para 2025 .</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6862818",
          "weight": "50.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862826",
          "weight": "50.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_Waste_and_Materials.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_4_Waste_reduction_targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892007,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+2.5 Food waste management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_5_Food_waste_management.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "2.5 Food waste management",
      "question": "How does the company minimize food waste and report on its results?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "According to the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, one third of the food produced is wasted, while more than 800 million people go hungry every day. Just a quarter of these losses could feed almost 870 million people.  <br>\n<br>\n According to a definition by the French Ministry of Agriculture and Food, food wastage means \"any food intended for human consumption that is lost, thrown away or spoiled at some stage of the food chain\". The causes of food wastage in households are manifold and are associated in particular with the loss of monetary and symbolic value of food in relation to other expenditure and activities, changes in society and family organisation, new ways of eating, changes in the pace of life, etc. However, in addition to this individual responsibility, food wastage is observed at all stages of the food chain and applies to all actors: producers, processors, distributors, restaurateurs and transporters.<br>\n<br>\nReducing food wastage is a threefold challenge.<br>\nchallenge:<br>\n- Environmental: on a global scale, food waste is a vector of significant GHG emissions, taking into account the energy needed to produce, process, preserve, package and transport,<br>\npackaging and transport. It is also a significant waste of natural resources, in particular water;<br>\n- Economic: food waste inevitably involves a huge monetary waste;<br>\n- Ethical and social: throwing food away is even more unacceptable in the perspective of a global food crisis, as well as in the current social context specific to each country.<br>\n<br>\nAlthough the retail sector is responsible for 5% of food waste compared to 42% at household level, the ability of the retail sector to act is crucial in managing food waste.<br>\nMost of the food bought in supermarkets that spoils and cannot be \"recycled\" is fresh, with a waste rate of 2.05% in this category, according to the report \"Food waste management in large-scale retail\" produced by Nielsen and Checkpoint in collaboration with Aecoc.<br>\n<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess supermarkets' efforts on Food Waste by focusing on how they manage and publish their various measures and targets to prevent and reduce it.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6862842",
          "weight": "12"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862850",
          "weight": "12"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862862",
          "weight": "15"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862870",
          "weight": "12"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862878",
          "weight": "12"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862886",
          "weight": "8"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862894",
          "weight": "8"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862902",
          "weight": "9"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862834",
          "weight": "12"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_Waste_and_Materials.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_5_Food_waste_management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892016,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+2.6 Hazardous waste management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_6_Hazardous_waste_management.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "2.6 Hazardous waste management",
      "question": "How does the company manage and publish its hazardous waste?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "With this metric based on the \"GRI 306-2 Waste by Type and Disposal Method\" standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish data related to the management and recycling of their hazardous waste.<br>\nIn the case of supermarkets, this waste can be batteries, fluorescent bulbs, used oil, car batteries and fluorescent bulbs containing mercury, electronic and computer equipment, toners, etc...<br>\nNot to be confused with hazardous waste collected from customers via in-store collection points",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6862910",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862926",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862918",
          "weight": "33.33"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_Waste_and_Materials.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_6_Hazardous_waste_management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892025,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+2.7 Management of containers and packaging",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_7_Management_of_containers_and_packaging.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "2.7 Management of containers and packaging",
      "question": "How does the company minimize the environmental impact of its containers and packaging and report on its results?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "Packaging waste is the largest part of the total waste generated by a supermarket (more than 80% of the total). Packaging is indispensable for many items in order to protect the product and ensure quality, so it cannot be completely avoided. <br>\nHowever, there is much room for improvement by these companies, as private label manufacturers and retailers, to make these materials less harmful to our environment and actually avoid them when they are not entirely necessary. <br>\nThe 3Rs maxim: \"Reduce, Recycle, Reuse\" must always be present throughout the supermarket value chain in innovation, manufacturing, supplier selection, transport of goods, storage and all those processes that can add to the huge amount of waste we generate.     <br>\n<br>\nWith this metric we evaluate companies' efforts in packaging management by focusing on their actions on recycling, reduction and reuse, use of sustainable materials, publication of their data, prevention and education.          <br>\n<br>\nAspects related to plastic use, such as the use of single-use plastics, promotion and supply of bulk products, plastic bags, etc., are dealt with separately in metric 2.8 Single-use plastic management.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6862938",
          "weight": "12"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862946",
          "weight": "12"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862954",
          "weight": "17"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862962",
          "weight": "18"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862970",
          "weight": "12"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862978",
          "weight": "17"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6862990",
          "weight": "12"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_Waste_and_Materials.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_7_Management_of_containers_and_packaging+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892034,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+2.8  Single-use plastic management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_8_Single_use_plastic_management.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "2.8  Single-use plastic management",
      "question": "How does the company address the single-use plastic problem with measures to reduce it and report on their results?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Esta métrica se basa en el estudio de evaluación elaborado por Greenpeace España \"Ranking de Huella Plástica de los supermercados\" llevado a cabo a finales de 2018 y finales 2019.    </p>\r\n<p>Aunque el comportamiento de las empresas con respecto al uso y disposición del plástico en sus puntos de ventas debería estar incluido en nuestra anterior métrica  \"2.7 Gestión de envases y embalajes\" creemos que por el impacto de este material en el medioambiente merece ser tratado de forma individual. </p>\r\n<p>Para ello hemos utilizado el estudio de evaluación corporativo más completo  y riguroso en cuanto al uso del plástico que existe actualmente en España y que precisamente se especializa en la calificación de supermercados como este \"Ranking de Huella Plástica de Greenpeace\".    </p>\r\n<p>Algunos parámetros que evalúa Greenpeace en este ranking pueden ser redundantes con los considerados en nuestro apartado de Gestion de residuos y materiales,  pero solo hemos querido dar visibilidad a este estudio y ampliar el ámbito de evaluación en esta área de la Economía Circular aprovechando la experiencia de la organización ambientalista.                                                                                                                                          En cualquier caso, le hemos dado una ponderación muy baja a esta métrica dentro del apartado de Residuos teniendo en cuenta que no es una investigación directa de Eticonsum y que hemos tenido que adaptar su sistema de calificación y sus puntuaciones a nuestra metodología de preguntas.</p>",
      "methodology": "In 2018 Greenpeace identified the supermarkets with the largest market share, level of overpacking, and customer ratings. Those chosen were: Mercadona, Carrefour, D?a, Eroski, Lidl, Alcampo, El Corte Ingl?s, and Aldi. Lawsuits presented to achieve a reduction in plastics were ten in total associated with each of the 10 questions included in this metric:<br>\n<br>\nThe company :<br>\n<br>\n1) It has a roadmap with dates and specific actions to reduce single-use plastics from its products and establishments by gradually eliminating them.<br>\n2) It has plans to invest in reusable packaging and in new product distribution systems to reduce the amount of single-use packaging used for its products.<br>\n3) It does not encourage false solutions based on the culture of throwaway.<br>\n4) It has concrete plans to phase out single-use fruit and vegetable packaging progressively.<br>\n5) You have concrete plans to increase your bulk sales.<br>\n6) It has concrete plans to eliminate single-use bags from its establishments, both in the box and in the section.<br>\n7) You have plans to dispose of non-recyclable single-use items such as silverware, plates, or straws.<br>\n8) It makes public the data of plastic consumption in its products and establishments to be transparent about its plastic footprint.<br>\n9) Has plans to work with suppliers of non-private label products to reduce single-use plastics from the supply chain<br>\n10) You have plans to eliminate all packaging that is not 100% recyclable<br>\n<br>\nAccording to the environmental organization, each demand and each submitted commitment has been analyzed in situ in the different supermarkets. One of the key factors in this evaluation is transparency in their plastic footprint, that is, the goal is for supermarkets to make public information about all the plastics they use each year and all those they reduce so that we can know what their commitments mean. and be transparent with consumers. This exercise was carried out in both 2018 and 2019.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6862998",
          "weight": "18"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863006",
          "weight": "18"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863014",
          "weight": "18"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863022",
          "weight": "8"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863030",
          "weight": "8"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863038",
          "weight": "8"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863050",
          "weight": "8"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863062",
          "weight": "8"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863074",
          "weight": "4"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863082",
          "weight": "2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_Waste_and_Materials.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_8_Single_use_plastic_management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892044,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+3. Energy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_Energy.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "3. Energy",
      "question": "How does the company manage energy consumption in an efficient and sustainable way, limiting its impact and reporting its results?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of Eticonsum's research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector on environmental, social and ethical issues. <br>\n Eticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialising in ESG (environment, social, governance) corporate performance applied to consumer insights. <br>\n We research and analyse the ethical market in the FMCG sector and assess the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n <br>\n Companies are evaluated on the basis of all their published information on extra-financial performance, including their Corporate Social Responsibility reports, Annual Reports, Codes of Conduct, Sustainability Reports, Non-Financial Information according to law 11/2018, etc ....<br>\n<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess how the company manages energy consumption in an efficient and sustainable way, limiting its impact and reporting its results.<br>\n <br>\nAs the European Environment Agency explains, at the heart of the climate change mitigation challenges is our global energy consumption and our dependence on fossil fuels. To limit global warming, we urgently need to use energy efficiently, as well as switch to clean energy sources for transport, heating or cooling.<br>\n Globally, energy consumption represents by far the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions from human activities. Around two-thirds of global greenhouse gas emissions are linked to the burning of fossil fuels used for heating, electricity, transport and industry.<br>\n <br>\n Supermarkets are one of the most energy intensive retail sectors, with the majority of their energy consumption coming from refrigeration systems (around 60% of total energy expenditure); lighting (18%); air conditioning (approximately 15%)",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Education Initiatives",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6892053",
          "weight": "20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892062",
          "weight": "50"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892072",
          "weight": "30"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Environmental_Performance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_Energy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892053,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+3.1 Registration and publication of the energy consumed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_1_Registration_and_publication_of_the_energy_consumed.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "3.1 Registration and publication of the energy consumed",
      "question": "How does the company monitor, record and publish its energy consumption?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of Eticonsum's research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector on environmental, social and ethical issues.   <br>\nEticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialising in ESG (environment, social, governance) corporate performance applied to consumer insights. <br>\nWe research and analyse the ethical market in the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n<br>\nWith this metric based on the GRI 302: Energy standard, we aim to assess companies' efforts to measure and publish their energy consumption inside and outside the organisation.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6863090",
          "weight": "22"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863098",
          "weight": "15"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863106",
          "weight": "24"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863114",
          "weight": "24"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863126",
          "weight": "15"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_Energy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_1_Registration_and_publication_of_the_energy_consumed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892062,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+3.2 Efficiency and energy saving",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_2_Efficiency_and_energy_saving.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "3.2 Efficiency and energy saving",
      "question": "How does the company save its energy consumption and make it more efficient?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of Eticonsum's research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector on environmental, social and ethical issues.   <br>\nEticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialising in ESG (environment, social, governance) corporate performance applied to consumer insights. <br>\nWe research and analyse the ethical market in the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n<br>\nWith this metric we refer to the 2 most important aspects of sustainable energy consumption: Efficiency and Savings.<br>\n<br>\nEnergy saving involves a change in consumption habits such as avoiding energy waste.<br>\nEnergy efficiency is the fact of minimising the amount of energy needed to satisfy the demand without affecting its quality; it means replacing one piece of equipment with another that, with the same performance, consumes less electricity, for example.<br>\n<br>\nIn order to reduce energy consumption as much as possible, energy saving and energy efficiency measures should be combined.",
      "methodology": "With this metric based on the\" \"content 302-4 Reduction of energy consumption\" \"of the standard\" \"GRI 302: Energy\" \"we intend to evaluate the efforts of companies to improve the efficiency and saving of their energy consumption, focusing on the following indicators:<br>\n<br>\n- Improvements in energy efficiency<br>\n- Savings objectives<br>\n- Reduction of energy intensity<br>\n- Energy certifications<br>\n- Relative consumption per m2<br>\n- Promotion of energy saving",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Education Initiatives",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6863134",
          "weight": "9.5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863142",
          "weight": "9.5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863150",
          "weight": "9.5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863158",
          "weight": "9.5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863166",
          "weight": "9.5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863183",
          "weight": "9.5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863191",
          "weight": "9.5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863199",
          "weight": "9.5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863207",
          "weight": "9.5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863215",
          "weight": "9.5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863227",
          "weight": "5"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_Energy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_2_Efficiency_and_energy_saving+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892072,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+3.3 Renewable energy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_3_Renewable_energy.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "3.3 Renewable energy",
      "question": "To what extent does the energy used by the company come from low-impact renewable resources?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of Eticonsum's research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector on environmental, social and ethical issues.   <br>\nEticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialising in ESG (environment, social, governance) corporate performance applied to consumer insights. <br>\nWe research and analyse the ethical market in the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n<br>\nWith this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts to source energy from both purchased and self-generated renewable sources.<br>\n<br>\nRenewable energy or 'green energy' generally emits fewer GHG emissions than other energy sources that supply the electricity grid. <br>\n<br>\nExamples are solar photovoltaic panels, solar thermal, geothermal energy, landfill gas, low-impact hydropower and wind turbines. This description can be found on page 98 and chapter 4 of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.<br>\n<br>\nThe complexity of the energy industry means that although the energy supplied to the grid can be green or 'brown' (i.e. from fossil fuels), the type of electricity generated from both is identical and indistinguishable. Moreover, there is no separate 'green electricity grid', which would be economically unviable.<br>\n As a result, buying green electricity does not actually mean that green electricity is tapped from the grid, it only means that the supplier added electricity from green power to the grid, which must be properly guaranteed by a Certificate of Guarantee of Origin issued by the trading company. <br>\n<br>\nFor this reason, it is important that the \"additionality\" criteria, whereby investment in new renewable assets that will reduce the generation of energy from polluting sources is made viable in the signing of long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) between the renewable developer and the consumer (the company assessed in this metric), are met",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6863235",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863243",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863251",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863259",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863267",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863279",
          "weight": "16.67"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_Energy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+3_3_Renewable_energy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892081,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+4. Water",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_Water.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "4. Water",
      "question": "What is the company's score according to its performance in water management disclosed in its reports?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta métrica forma parte del estudio de investigación de Eticonsum sobre la evaluación de las empresas del sector Retail Food en materia medioambiental, social y ética. </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Eticonsum es una agencia de investigación de mercado sin fines de lucro especializada en desempeño corporativo ESG (medioambiental, social, gobernanza) aplicado al conocimiento del consumidor. </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Investigamos y analizamos el mercado ético del sector de bienes de consumo y evaluamos el desempeño ambiental y social de las empresas con el fin de ayudar tanto a los consumidores conscientes a decidir según sus valores, como a las empresas a competir en reputación ética. </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Con esta métrica pretendemos evaluar cómo la empresa gestiona y publica su consumo, extracción y vertido de agua de forma eficiente y sostenible.</span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Parte de la responsabilidad hídrica de los supermercados está vinculada al consumo de agua procedente de la actividad de los sectores comerciales (carnicería, pescadería, panadería, pastelería, etc.), limpieza de suelos, producción de hielo para pescado, personal de higiene de los empleados, riego de espacios verdes, etc. Una buena gestión y racionalización del agua debe abarcar no solo los puntos de venta sino también las plataformas logísticas y oficinas.</span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Ahora, la parte importante en cuanto al impacto hídrico de los supermercados está relacionada con la comercialización de los productos que tienen (o deben) controlar, que son su propia marca. </span><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Su producción puede estar sujeta a riesgos relacionados con el agua en los países fabricantes y productores. </span><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esto se aplica en particular a los productos agrícolas y ganaderos, cuya producción representa alrededor del 70% del uso mundial de agua, y a la industria textil. </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Se necesitan 15.400 litros de agua para producir un kilo de carne de vacuno, se necesitan 2.700 litros para hacer una camiseta o 4.400 para hacer un par de zapatillas.</span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Si bien el consumo de agua de los minoristas en sus áreas comerciales, oficinas y plataformas logísticas es importante, en esta evaluación nos gustaría incorporar más elementos sobre la huella hídrica que afecta la producción de marcas propias en los supermercados, que es donde se encuentra. </span><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">el verdadero impacto hídrico de estas entidades. </span><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Sin embargo, aunque damos un peso mucho mayor a aquellas cuestiones relacionadas con la gestión del agua en su cadena de suministro, no podemos ir más lejos en cuanto a indicadores principalmente cuantitativos debido a las limitaciones informativas de sus publicaciones al respecto. </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Nuestro objetivo es seguir investigando fuentes secundarias para obtener más información.</span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Con esta métrica pretendemos evaluar cómo la empresa gestiona y publica su consumo, extracción y vertido de agua de forma eficiente y sostenible y comunica sus datos y acciones respecto a: </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">- Registrar y reportar su consumo de agua </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">- Gestión y reducción de su consumo de agua </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">- Veridos e impacto de las aguas residuales </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">- Reciclaje y reutilización de agua </span></span><br><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Wikirate vs. Eticonsum: </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">El sistema de puntuación de Eticonsum es superior a 100 puntos, donde 0 es la puntuación más baja y 100 es la más alta, mientras que el sistema Wikirate estandarizado es superior a 10. Así, una puntuación de 75/100 en la plataforma Eticonsum equivaldría a 7, 5/10 en Wikirate.org</span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6892091",
          "weight": "24"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892100",
          "weight": "60"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892109",
          "weight": "16"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Environmental_Performance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_Water+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892091,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+4.1 Publication of water consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_1_Publication_of_water_consumption.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "4.1 Publication of water consumption",
      "question": "How does the company monitor, record and publish its water consumption?.",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of the Eticonsum research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector in environmental, social and ethical matters.<br>\nEticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialized in corporate performance ESG (environment, social, governance) applied to consumer knowledge.<br>\nWe research and analyze the ethical market of the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values, and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" standard, we intend to evaluate the efforts of companies to measure and publish their absolute and relative water consumption and take the first steps towards measuring the water footprint of the minus some of their products.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6863292",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863300",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863308",
          "weight": "33.33"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_Water.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_1_Publication_of_water_consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892100,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+4.2 Management and reduction of water consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_2_Management_and_reduction_of_water_consumption.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "4.2 Management and reduction of water consumption",
      "question": "How does the company manage the reduction of its own water consumption and that of its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of the Eticonsum research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector in environmental, social and ethical matters.<br>\nEticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialized in corporate performance ESG (environment, social, governance) applied to consumer knowledge.<br>\nWe research and analyze the ethical market of the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values, and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n<br>\nWith this metric based on the standard \"\" GRI 303: WATER <strong>AND</strong> EFFLUENTS \"\" we intend to evaluate the efforts of companies to reduce and sustainably manage their water consumption and take the first steps in order to control the water impact in their chain of supply",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6863316",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863324",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863336",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863344",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863352",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863360",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863368",
          "weight": "14.29"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_Water.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_2_Management_and_reduction_of_water_consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892109,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+4.3 Wastewater and recycling",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_3_Wastewater_and_recycling.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "4.3 Wastewater and recycling",
      "question": "How does the company manage wastewater discharges and water recycling?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of the Eticonsum research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector in environmental, social and ethical matters.<br>Eticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialized in corporate performance ESG (environment, social, governance) applied to consumer knowledge.<br>We investigate and analyze the ethical market of the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values, as well as companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br><br>With this metric based on the standard \"\" GRI 303: WATER AND EFFLUENTS \"\" we intend to take a first step in the area of responsibility of mass consumption companies regarding the impact of their production chain on water, specifically regarding microplastics dumped in textile and cosmetic manufacturing, in addition to knowing if they adopt recycling and reuse measures of water in order to achieve greater efficiency in their consumption.<br><br></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6863380",
          "weight": "50"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863388",
          "weight": "25"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863396",
          "weight": "25"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_Water.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+4_3_Wastewater_and_recycling+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892118,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+5. Biodiversity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_Biodiversity.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "5. Biodiversity",
      "question": "What is the company's score according to its performance in relation to biodiversity disclosed in its reports?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta métrica forma parte del estudio de investigación de Eticonsum sobre la evaluación de las empresas del sector Retail Food en materia medioambiental, social y ética. </span></span></span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Eticonsum es una agencia de investigación de mercado sin fines de lucro especializada en desempeño corporativo ESG (medioambiental, social, gobernanza) aplicado al conocimiento del consumidor. </span></span></span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Investigamos y analizamos el mercado ético del sector de bienes de consumo y evaluamos el desempeño ambiental y social de las empresas con el fin de ayudar tanto a los consumidores conscientes a decidir según sus valores, como a las empresas a competir en reputación ética.</span></span></span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">El desempeño de la biodiversidad entendida como un indicador ambiental según el Global Reporting Initiative (GRI 304_Biodiversity) y el reglamento 11/2018 sobre el estado de la información no financiera (? Medidas tomadas para preservar o restaurar la biodiversidad.? Impactos causados ​​por actividades u operaciones en áreas protegidas) generalmente no se considera dentro del análisis de materialidad del sector minorista de alimentos. </span></span></span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Teniendo en cuenta que, en general, las instalaciones comerciales, productivas y logísticas de los supermercados no suelen estar ubicadas en terrenos considerados urbanos y sus impactos en la biodiversidad de áreas protegidas o áreas de alta biodiversidad son insignificantes, las cadenas de supermercados no incluyen este indicador en sus informes ambientales.</span></span></span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Sin embargo, son muchos los aspectos relacionados con la Biodiversidad y el hábitat en los que estas empresas tienen gran influencia e impacto y por tanto una obligación constante de mantener estándares de responsabilidad a la altura de su tamaño y facturación: pesca sostenible, forestal, productos orgánicos, agricultura sostenible, monocultivos, etc. </span></span></span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">La responsabilidad de los supermercados en este sentido comienza en su cadena de suministro a partir de la producción y fabricación de sus propios productos de marca blanca. </span></span></span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">La agricultura intensiva, la sobrepesca y la deforestación son amenazas de proporciones globales que deben estar muy presentes en sus políticas de abastecimiento y evaluaciones de impacto de sus actividades.</span></span></span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Por tanto, las empresas deben ser conscientes de las posibles consecuencias de su actividad sobre la creciente sobrecarga de los ecosistemas, que a su vez puede afectar la disponibilidad de materias primas para sus propios productos.</span></span></span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Con esta métrica pretendemos evaluar el compromiso y desempeño de las empresas a favor de la Biodiversidad y la correcta divulgación de sus datos y acciones en el campo de: </span></span></span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">- Reconocimiento del impacto de sus actividades y medidas para proteger la biodiversidad </span></span></span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">- Pesca sustentable </span></span></span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">- Oferta de productos orgánicos y sostenibles </span></span></span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">- Madera y papel sostenibles </span></span></span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">- Monocultivos (aceite de palma, soja, algodón) </span></span></span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">- Modificación genética </span></span></span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">- Cultivos en conflicto (cacao, café y té) </span></span></span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Sistema de puntuación Wikirate vs.Eticonsum:</span></span></span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">El sistema de puntuación de Eticonsum es de 100 puntos, donde 0 es la puntuación más baja y 100 la más alta, mientras que el sistema estandarizado de Wikirate es de 10. Por lo tanto, una puntuación de 75/100 en la plataforma de Eticonsum sería equivalente a 7,5 / 10 en Wikirate. </span><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">org</span></span></span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6892128",
          "weight": "15"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892137",
          "weight": "22"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892146",
          "weight": "15"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892155",
          "weight": "15"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892164",
          "weight": "18"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892173",
          "weight": "4"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892182",
          "weight": "11"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Environmental_Performance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_Biodiversity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892128,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+5.1 Protection of biodiversity and management of the impacts of the activity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_1_Protection_of_biodiversity_and_management_of_the_impacts_of_the_activity.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "5.1 Protection of biodiversity and management of the impacts of the activity",
      "question": "How does the company recognize and manage the impacts of its activity on biodiversity?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of the Eticonsum research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector in environmental, social and ethical matters.<br>\nEticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialized in corporate performance ESG (environment, social, governance) applied to consumer knowledge.<br>\nWe research and analyze the ethical market of the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values, and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n<br>\nWith this metric based on the \"\" GRI 304: Biodiversity \"\" standard, we intend to evaluate how companies recognize and manage the impacts of their activity on biodiversity and establish measures to minimize and preserve them",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6863404",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863412",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863420",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863428",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863438",
          "weight": "20.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_1_Protection_of_biodiversity_and_management_of_the_impacts_of_the_activity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892137,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+5.2 Sustainable fishing",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_2_Sustainable_fishing.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "5.2 Sustainable fishing",
      "question": "How does the company establish policies on the purchase of sustainable fish and ensure correct information to the consumer?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of Eticonsum's research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector on environmental, social and ethical issues.   <br>\nEticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialising in ESG (environment, social, governance) corporate performance applied to consumer insights. <br>\nWe research and analyse the ethical market in the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by the main distributors in Spain regarding the responsible purchasing and marketing of their fish and aquaculture products and their efforts in certification, labelling, legislative compliance, non-commercialisation of illegal fishing, no conflicting fish and the promotion of sustainable fishing.         <br>\n<br>\nUp to 20% of the world's fisheries are illegal, according to the United Nations (UN), which negatively affects the marine ecosystem. Moreover, 33% of the world's fish stocks are overfished.<br>\nAccording to this organisation, sustainable fishing must be carried out at a level that allows it to continue indefinitely. To this it adds that \"fishing operations must be carried out with care, so that other species and habitats within the ecosystem remain in good condition\".     <br>\n<br>\nAccording to the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), three quarters of the world's fish stocks are fully exploited or overfished; 88% of EU stocks are overfished, compared to a global average of 25%. Moreover, worldwide, stocks of large predators such as cod, tuna and swordfish have declined by 90%, mainly due to overfishing. <br>\nIn Spain, consumers spend more than 5.6 billion euros annually on fish products, almost 70% in supermarkets and hypermarkets, as large supermarkets account for the majority of fish sales compared to small fishmongers.      <br>\n<br>\nThe power of the large distributors, by acquiring and marketing the majority of fish products in Spain, puts them in a very important strategic position to influence the fishing industry.<br>\n<br>\nPublic, political and corporate recognition of the threat that unsustainable fishing poses to the marine environment has meant that supermarkets have made great strides in sourcing sustainable fish.  Even so, many of the species that can currently be found on the fish counters of Spanish supermarkets, whether fresh, frozen or canned, continue to come, for the most part, from overexploited stocks or from catches that use fishing methods that are highly destructive to the marine environment.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6863448",
          "weight": "7.69"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863456",
          "weight": "7.69"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863464",
          "weight": "7.69"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863472",
          "weight": "7.69"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863480",
          "weight": "7.69"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863488",
          "weight": "7.69"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863500",
          "weight": "7.69"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863508",
          "weight": "7.69"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863516",
          "weight": "7.69"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863524",
          "weight": "7.69"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863532",
          "weight": "7.69"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863540",
          "weight": "7.69"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863552",
          "weight": "7.69"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_2_Sustainable_fishing+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892146,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+5.3 Organic and sustainable products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_3_Organic_and_sustainable_products.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "5.3 Organic and sustainable products",
      "question": "What is the company's position regarding ecological / sustainable production and how does it promote it among its suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of Eticonsum's research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector on environmental, social and ethical issues.   <br>\nEticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialising in ESG (environment, social, governance) corporate performance applied to consumer insights. <br>\nWe research and analyse the ethical market in the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the distribution and promotion of organic products and the level of pesticide residues and sustainable origin of their fruit and vegetables.<br>\n<br>\nThe organic products business is worth 1,000 million euros in Spain, with year-on-year growth of 25%, thanks mainly to fruit, vegetables, vegetable drinks and eggs.<br>\nLidl is the chain with the best sales success in organic products with the highest share of the organic market, specifically 16.5 points, according to 2018 data from the consultancy firm Kantar Worldpanel. It is followed by Carrefour (14.7 points) and Aldi (12.4 points).<br>\n<br>\nThere is a certain consensus that organic products generally offer many more guarantees than conventional products and are therefore, a priori, a better option for both the environment and health.<br>\nIn this sense, in this metric we focus on eco-certifications as an element of objective measurement and comparability, although we also include other accreditations of environmental guarantees for fruit and vegetables, as well as pesticide requirements. <br>\n<br>\nIn any case, we must make it clear that the BIO certifications do not accredit the origin of the product, so we can find ingruences such as in those organic products grown in Asia or America, packaged in another EU country and sold in Spain (e.g. organic packaged rice, grown in India and packaged in Italy). <br>\nIf we add to this the fact that organic products are often over-packaged and that they do not always respect natural cycles and seasonality, we come to the conclusion that buying organic in these cases is \"worse the cure than the disease\". <br>\n<br>\nThe ideal situation in this sense would be for the chains to include an offer of organic products, but with environmental coherence and not only because of the boom in demand in this niche, that the production, processing and packaging has been carried out in Spain, especially in those cases in which the raw material/product is available in our territory without having to resort to foreign countries. In this case, the EU label must include \"Agricultura Espa?a\" above \"Agricultura UE\" and above all above \"Agricultura no UE\". <br>\nSpain is the main organic producer in Europe and the fifth in the world, and a large part of the production is exported, so there is no excuse for not offering national organic products.<br>\n<br>\nTherefore, organic products (ecological, organic,...) YES, but local, as \"naked\" as possible (without packaging) and seasonal, respecting the natural cycles of cultivation",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6863560",
          "weight": "13"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863568",
          "weight": "13"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863581",
          "weight": "13"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863589",
          "weight": "13"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863597",
          "weight": "13"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863605",
          "weight": "13"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863617",
          "weight": "7.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863625",
          "weight": "7.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863633",
          "weight": "7.33"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_3_Organic_and_sustainable_products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892155,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+5.4 Wood and paper",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_4_Wood_and_paper.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "5.4 Wood and paper",
      "question": "What policies and initiatives does the company establish for the purchase and sustainable use of paper and wood?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of the Eticonsum research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector in environmental, social and ethical matters.<br>\nEticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialized in corporate performance ESG (environment, social, governance) applied to consumer knowledge.<br>\nWe investigate and analyze the ethical market of the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values, as well as companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n<br>\nWith this metric we intend to make known and compare the actions and policies of the main distributors in Spain regarding the recycled and sustainable origin of the raw material of forest origin used both in the elements used by their customers and collaborators (paper bags, material advertising and office), as in the assortment of own brand products on the shelves.<br>\nThese policies are summarized in the following 3 areas of action in terms of the sustainable use of wood, paper and cardboard:<br>\n<br>\n- Certifications that guarantee the sustainability of these raw materials (FSC, PEFC, ECOLABEL, ..)<br>\n- Recycled Paper / Cardboard / Wood (PCM)<br>\n- Initiatives of reduction (less quantity of paper / wood used), of replacement (by digitization actions such as digital purchase receipt, ...) or elimination (such as the non-distribution of paper brochures)<br>\n<br>\nBasically we start from the basis that if companies use paper, cardboard or wood, at least their impact on forests is the most controlled (which guarantees certification) or minimal possible (due to their recycled origin, their reduction or substitution).",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6863641",
          "weight": "20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863649",
          "weight": "13"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863661",
          "weight": "14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863669",
          "weight": "14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863677",
          "weight": "13"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863685",
          "weight": "13"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863693",
          "weight": "13"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_4_Wood_and_paper+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892164,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+5.5 Monocultures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_5_Monocultures.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "5.5 Monocultures",
      "question": "What supply policies does the company establish with regard to conflictive monocultures (palm oil, soybeans and cotton)?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of Eticonsum's research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector on environmental, social and ethical issues.   <br>\nEticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialising in ESG (environment, social, governance) corporate performance applied to consumer insights. <br>\nWe research and analyse the ethical market in the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n<br>\nWith this metric, we aim to provide insight into and compare the actions and policies of the main retailers in Spain regarding the use of monocultures (palm oil, soy and cotton) in their own-brand products and their recognition of their environmental impact. <br>\n<br>\nThe expansion of palm oil crops, especially in Southeast Asia, has been associated with the deforestation of tropical forests, the appropriation of land belonging to indigenous communities, human rights abuses and the death of different animal species, such as elephants and orangutans.<br>\nThe WHO (World Health Organisation) denounces that the palm oil industry is using similar tactics to the alcohol and tobacco industries to influence research related to the health effects of palm oil. It is an industry that according to the WHO has \"\"little control\"\" and whose \"\"main concerns\"\" are around the effect of exposure to palm oil particles on foetal and infant mortality.<br>\n<br>\nAccording to Greenpeace's \"Hooked on Meat\" report, approximately half of the soy produced globally is GM. The technology on which the different GM soya varieties are based is owned by a small handful of multinationals led by Bayer. Their main aim is to make the GM plants resistant to herbicide spraying. Of the GM soya grown in Brazil, 40% is genetically modified to be herbicide tolerant and 60% is genetically modified to be both glyphosate tolerant and insect resistant. Similarly, in Argentina, 83% of GM soybeans are tolerant to herbicides (again, mostly glyphosate) and 17% to insects.<br>\nThe large-scale conversion of natural habitats to intensive soybean cultivation and the heavy reliance on GM seeds resistant to insects and chemical pesticides inevitably contributes to biodiversity loss.<br>\n The most widely used broad-spectrum herbicide is glyphosate, which the World Health Organisation has described as \"probably carcinogenic to humans\". Fungicides and insecticides are also routinely used in soy cultivation.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6863701",
          "weight": "10.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863709",
          "weight": "10.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863721",
          "weight": "10.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863729",
          "weight": "10.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863737",
          "weight": "10.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863745",
          "weight": "10.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863753",
          "weight": "10.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863761",
          "weight": "10.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863769",
          "weight": "10.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863777",
          "weight": "10.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_5_Monocultures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892173,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+5.6 Genetic modification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_6_Genetic_modification.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "5.6 Genetic modification",
      "question": "What policies does the company establish with regard to GMOs in its own brand products?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of Eticonsum's research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector on environmental, social and ethical issues.   <br>\nEticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialising in ESG (environment, social, governance) corporate performance applied to consumer insights. <br>\nWe research and analyse the ethical market in the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n<br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the performance of the main distributors in Spain in relation to the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the animal feed of their own-brand products.<br>\nWe are not referring to the distributors' fresh or packaged finished products, which by law must not contain GMOs. In this respect, statements such as \"No products of our brands contain genetically modified organisms (GMOs)\" are meaningless. What we evaluate is the animal feed of fresh products (meat, poultry, fish,...). Excluded from this section would be certified \"organic\" products, which by law should not be exposed to genetically modified feed.<br>\n<br>\nAs Greenpeace points out in its report \"Hooked on meat\", in Brazil and Argentina more than 95% of soya is GM, which is accompanied by intensive use of herbicides and other dangerous chemical inputs.<br>\nPesticide use per unit area has increased by more than 170% in both countries since the 1990s. The result is not only large monoculture plots with extremely reduced biodiversity, but also massive use of pesticides with a high probability of damaging the health of farm workers and populations living in the vicinity.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6863789",
          "weight": "50.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863801",
          "weight": "50.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_6_Genetic_modification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892182,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+5.7 Cocoa, coffee and tea",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_7_Cocoa_coffee_and_tea.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "5.7 Cocoa, coffee and tea",
      "question": "What sustainable agriculture policies does the company establish for the supply of private label cocoa, coffee and tea?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of Eticonsum's research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector on environmental, social and ethical issues.   <br>\nEticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialising in ESG (environment, social, governance) corporate performance applied to consumer insights. <br>\nWe research and analyse the ethical market in the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n<br>\n With this metric, we aim to show and compare the performance of leading retailers in Spain in sourcing the so-called high-risk crops of cocoa, coffee and tea for their own brand. <br>\n<br>\nAs the Fair Trade movement warns, \"the large-scale production model, developed by the conventional food industry, based on large extensions of monoculture and the maximisation of short-term yields causes deforestation, desertification, soil erosion and loss of biodiversity of flora and fauna\".<br>\nThe most important crops that exemplify these impacts, beyond palm oil and soybeans discussed elsewhere, are cocoa, coffee and tea. These share production chains with many intermediaries and many benefits, although the first link in the chain, small farmers in southern countries, get the crumbs.<br>\n<br>\nBut aside from the social impact behind the cultivation of these commodities, what we consider in this section are their environmental consequences.<br>\n<br>\nIn the case of coffee, as the Coordinadora Estatal de Comercio Justo points out, in order to extend the crops and increase production in the short term, the felling of shade trees increases. This causes soil erosion, decreases climate regulation and hinders the maintenance of soil fertility and humidity, as well as the loss of diversity. Furthermore, this type of agribusiness model is oriented towards unshaded coffee monoculture systems that generate higher yields per hectare in the short term, but require a high use of synthetic chemicals, increase production costs and replace traditional practices.  <br>\n<br>\nCocoa has similarities to coffee. Its trees need shade to grow properly. In fact, its original environment was the Mesoamerican rainforest, which naturally provides shade trees. However, in order to make land available for cocoa cultivation, it is necessary to remove some trees and often the entire forest is removed to encourage faster growth of the trees and increase their yield in the short and medium term. But as cocoa trees age, their productivity declines and they become more vulnerable to disease.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6863809",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863817",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863825",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863833",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863841",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863849",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863861",
          "weight": "14.29"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+5_7_Cocoa_coffee_and_tea+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892191,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+6. Animal Welfare",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_Animal_Welfare.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "6. Animal Welfare",
      "question": "What is the company's animal welfare performance score disclosed in its reports?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta métrica forma parte del estudio de investigación de Eticonsum sobre la evaluación de las empresas del sector Retail Food en cuestiones medioambientales, sociales y éticas. </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Eticonsum es una agencia de investigación de mercado sin fines de lucro que se especializa en el desempeño corporativo de ESG (medio ambiente, social, gobernanza) aplicado a los conocimientos del consumidor. </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Investigamos y analizamos el mercado ético en el sector de bienes de consumo y evaluamos el desempeño ambiental y social de las empresas para ayudar tanto a los consumidores conscientes a decidir según sus valores como a las empresas a competir en reputación ética. </span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Con esta métrica pretendemos mostrar y comparar las políticas adoptadas por los principales minoristas de España sobre bienestar animal y cómo lo aplican en su cadena de suministro, así como sus esfuerzos para certificar sus productos animales de marca propia.</span></span><br><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">En el actual sistema de producción y consumo desenfrenado, donde los animales se crían cada vez más en sistemas intensivos, es aún más necesario establecer estándares para garantizar el Bienestar Animal. </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Los consumidores, preocupados por las condiciones en las que viven los animales, están obligando a las empresas a implementar cada vez más sistemas que garanticen mejores condiciones para los animales. </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Las 2 principales áreas de responsabilidad de los supermercados en relación a la producción y distribución de productos con materias primas de origen animal es por un lado respetar las condiciones de vida de los animales y por otro lado reconocer, explicar y minimizar el impacto negativo de la ganadería cada vez más intensiva en la que los minoristas son los principales actores.</span></span></p>\r\n<p><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Nuestro espectro de criterios y preguntas en esta métrica cubre los esfuerzos de certificación de Bienestar Animal de los minoristas. </span><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Sin embargo, también cubre aspectos que en principio no están cubiertos por tales certificaciones o pueden ser cumplidos por empresas sin necesariamente alcanzar el alcance general de los requisitos para obtener un sello. </span></span><br><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Por ejemplo, muchas empresas pueden desarrollar una política específica como eliminar los huevos de las gallinas enjauladas de su gama de productos, tener una amplia gama de alternativas veganas, exigir políticas favorables a los animales de sus proveedores, invertir en proyectos para mejorar el bienestar animal, etc. y no tener una certificación de Bienestar Animal</span></span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6892200",
          "weight": "72"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892209",
          "weight": "16"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892218",
          "weight": "12"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Environmental_Performance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_Animal_Welfare+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892200,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+6.1 Animal welfare policies and management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "6.1 Animal welfare policies and management",
      "question": "How does the company manage Animal Welfare, establish specific policies and objectives and report on the results?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of Eticonsum's research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector on environmental, social and ethical issues. <br>\n Eticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialising in ESG (environment, social, governance) corporate performance applied to consumer insights. <br>\n We research and analyse the ethical market in the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n <br>\nWith this metric we aim to show and compare the management of the main distributors in Spain with regard to the treatment of animals, focusing mainly on the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\n- The communication of a specific and comprehensive policy on Animal Welfare.<br>\n- The requirements to their own brand suppliers<br>\n- Responsible use of antibiotics<br>\n- Their requirements on the animal treatment of their non-food products.<br>\n- Their offer of eggs not from caged hens<br>\n- its policy on common malpractice (premature death of male chickens)<br>\n- Its initiatives to encourage the reduction of meat consumption<br>\n- Their offer of products free of animal abuse (vegetarian, organic).<br>\n<br>\nThis spectrum of criteria and questions covers aspects that in principle are not covered by animal welfare certifications or can be fulfilled by companies without necessarily reaching the overall scope of requirements to obtain a label. <br>\nFor example, many companies can develop a specific policy such as eliminating eggs from caged hens from their product range, have a wide range of vegan alternatives, demand animal welfare policies from their suppliers, invest in projects to improve animal welfare, etc. and not have a specific certification.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6863869",
          "weight": "5.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863877",
          "weight": "5.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863885",
          "weight": "5.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863893",
          "weight": "5.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863901",
          "weight": "5.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863913",
          "weight": "5.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863921",
          "weight": "5.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863929",
          "weight": "5.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863937",
          "weight": "5.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863945",
          "weight": "5.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863953",
          "weight": "5.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863961",
          "weight": "5.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863973",
          "weight": "5.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863981",
          "weight": "5.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863989",
          "weight": "5.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6863997",
          "weight": "5.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6864005",
          "weight": "5.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6864013",
          "weight": "5.26"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6864021",
          "weight": "5.26"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_Animal_Welfare.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_1_Animal_welfare_policies_and_management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892209,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+6.2 Animal welfare certifications",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_2_Animal_welfare_certifications.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "6.2 Animal welfare certifications",
      "question": "How does the company demonstrate its performance in Animal Welfare through certifications and recognitions?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of Eticonsum's research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector on environmental, social and ethical issues. <br>Eticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialising in ESG (environment, social, governance) corporate performance applied to consumer insights. <br>We research and analyse the ethical market in the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br><br>With this metric we aim to publicise and compare the policies adopted by leading retailers in Spain in their efforts to certify the animal welfare of their own-brand products.<br><br>The animal welfare seal allows consumers to identify food that has been produced under specific animal husbandry and handling conditions.<br>In recent years, consumer purchasing criteria have changed. They no longer only value aspects such as best-before date, nutritional value or food safety, but are increasingly interested in information on how animals are treated on farms and in livestock facilities.<br><br>Eurobarometer 2016 already indicated that 64% of Europeans (71% of Spaniards) demand more information on the conditions under which farm animals are reared. For this reason, there are increasing calls for common animal welfare labelling, which would better inform consumers about the different products on the market in this respect, as is already the case for eggs.<br>In the meantime, which we doubt at least in the short term, the most widely used and most widely used reference labels for animal welfare by companies are :<br><br>- <strong>Animal Welfare certified by AENOR</strong>. This independent certification, which follows the Welfare Quality protocol, is approved by the Instituto de Investigaci?n y Tecnolog?a Agroalimentarias (IRTA).<br><br>- <strong>Interporc Animal Welfare Spain (IAWS)</strong>. Created by the Organizaci?n Interprofesional Agroalimentaria del Porcino de Capa Blanca (Interporc), this regulation guarantees the good practices in all the links of the value chain of this type of pig.<br><br>- <strong>ANDA</strong>. The seal of the National Association for the Defence of Animals certifies eggs from free-range and organic hens whose living and production conditions go beyond the minimum standards set by animal welfare legislation.<br><br>In this section we also consider the organic certifications of products of animal origin, which ensure good animal treatment in terms of rearing conditions for example (total freedom in the case of chicken and 81 days of growth, compared to 50 days for industrial chicken)</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6864033",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6864041",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6864049",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6864057",
          "weight": "25.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_Animal_Welfare.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_2_Animal_welfare_certifications+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892218,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+6.3 Animal welfare in the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_3_Animal_welfare_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "6.3 Animal welfare in the supply chain",
      "question": "How does the company apply Animal Welfare policies to its suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "This metric is part of Eticonsum's research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector on environmental, social and ethical issues. <br>\n Eticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialising in ESG (environment, social, governance) corporate performance applied to consumer insights. <br>\n We research and analyse the ethical market in the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values and companies to compete on ethical reputation.<br>\n <br>\nWith this metric we aim to publicise and compare the efforts of the main distributors in Spain in applying their animal welfare policy to their supply chain, focusing mainly on :<br>\n<br>\n- carrying out audits and inspections of major suppliers<br>\n- support and training of suppliers on animal welfare<br>\n- animal welfare requirements for non-branded suppliers",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6864082",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6864090",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6940576",
          "weight": "33.33"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_Animal_Welfare.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_3_Animal_welfare_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892247,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Forced Labor Risk Identification, GRI 409-1",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Forced_Labor_Risk_Identification_GRI_409_1.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Forced Labor Risk Identification, GRI 409-1",
      "question": "Does the company identify operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In the context of the GRI Standards, the social dimension of sustainability concerns an organization’s impacts on the social systems within which it operates. </span><strong><a href=\"/Source_000090321\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 409</a> </strong><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong>addresses the topic of forced or compulsory labor</strong>.</span></p>\r\n<p>Not to be subjected to forced or compulsory labor is a fundamental human right. According to International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention 29 ‘Forced Labour Convention’, forced or compulsory labor is defined as ‘all work or service which is exacted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered himself voluntarily.’</p>\r\n<p>Forced and compulsory labor affects all world regions, countries, and economic sectors, and includes workers in both formal and informal employment. Some of the most common forms of forced labor include forced labor in prisons (except for prisoners that have been convicted in a court of law, and whose labor is under the supervision and control of a public authority), human trafficking for the purpose of forced labor, coercion in employment, forced labor linked to exploitative labor contract systems, and debt-induced forced labor, also known as ‘debt-bondage’ or ‘bonded labor’.</p>\r\n<p>The victims are most likely from groups subject to discrimination or performing work on an informal or precarious basis. This can include women and girls forced into prostitution, migrants trapped in debt bondage, and sweatshop or farm workers, among other groups.</p>\r\n<p>Due diligence is expected of an organization in order to prevent and combat all forms of forced or compulsory labor within its activities. It is also expected to avoid contributing to or becoming linked to the use of forced or compulsory labor through its relationships with others (e.g., suppliers, clients).</p>\r\n<p>These concepts are covered in key instruments of the ILO, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and the United Nations: see References.</p>\r\n<p><strong>The disclosures in this Standard can provide information about an organization’s impacts related to forced or compulsory labor, and how it manages these impacts.</strong> Disclosures on the related topic of child labor can be found in: <a href=\"/Source_000090659\" target=\"_blank\">GRI 408: Child Labor</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric question you are being asked to look for identified forced or compulsory labor risks for the companies' operations and suppliers.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This information may be found in publicly available documents like Annual and Sustainability reports, and on the company website.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong>Keywords</strong> and search terms include: GRI, 409, GRI Index, Risks, Forced, Compulsory, Labor, Labour, Suppliers</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answer Yes</strong>: <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">If the company has reported that it has identified locations (countries, regions, etc.), or by operations type (minerals, manufacturing, etc.).</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong>Answer No</strong>: </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">If there is no reporting on risks found, or the company has mentioned risks, but not clearly stated the identification of places or types of operations</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For this metric '<span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\">Unknown</span>' is only appropriate where the company has published no reports whatsoever, or has no website. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 409 - Forced or Compulsory Labor",
        "GRI Standards+409-1 Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor",
        "GRI Standards+409-1-a Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+General Disclosures",
        "ESRS Standards+SBM.3 - Interaction of material impacts risks and opportunities with strategy and business model, and financial effects"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 362,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 16,
      "companies": 246,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2021+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Forced_Labor_Risk_Identification_GRI_409_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892313,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions publication exhaustively and disaggregated+Luis Leyton",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication_exhaustively_and_disaggregated+Luis_Leyton.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Scope 3 emissions publication exhaustively and disaggregated",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"\",\"No\":\"\",\"Unknown\":\"\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication_exhaustively_and_disaggregated+Luis_Leyton+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6892351,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Scope 3 emissions publication+Luis Leyton",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication+Luis_Leyton.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Scope 3 emissions publication",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"\",\"No\":\"\",\"Unknown\":\"\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Scope_3_emissions_publication+Luis_Leyton+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6899063,
      "name": "Walk Free+UK MSA Beyond Compliance Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "UK MSA Beyond Compliance Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What is the companies' disclosure rate on the 12 metrics formulated based on the UK home office statutory guidance accompanying the UK Modern Slavery Act?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Based on the Home Office guidance, 12 metrics were formulated which go beyond the minimum requirements of the UK Modern Slavery Act, looking for disclosure on the due diligence measures and actions that the UK government urges companies to report on.  This metric assesses how many of those 12 elements a company provides more information on.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Formula logic:</strong></p>\r\n<p>From the total amount of metrics (12), count the number of metrics that have not been disclosed to in the company's Modern Slavery statement (<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\"No\" if not present in the statement or \"Unknown\" if no statement could be found)</span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "/12",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (meets_minimum_uk_requirements === \"Yes\") {\n    [m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, m8, m9, m10, m11, MSA].filter(function(v) {\n      var ref;\n      return (ref = [v].flat()[0]) !== \"No\" && ref !== \"In Development\" && ref !== \"Remediation is mentioned but no details of the process or measures\";\n    }).length;\n  } else {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "No",
          "metric": "~5454264",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "No",
          "metric": "~1831908",
          "name": "m2"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "No",
          "metric": "~2722057",
          "name": "m3"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "No",
          "metric": "~2722223",
          "name": "m4"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "No",
          "metric": "~2722169",
          "name": "m5"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "No",
          "metric": "~1831964",
          "name": "m6"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "No",
          "metric": "~2722444",
          "name": "m7"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "No",
          "metric": "~2722458",
          "name": "m8"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "No",
          "metric": "~2722482",
          "name": "m9"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "No",
          "metric": "~1832024",
          "name": "m10"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "No",
          "metric": "~1832012",
          "name": "m11"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "No",
          "metric": "~1831932",
          "name": "MSA"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6901749",
          "name": "meets_minimum_uk_requirements"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2745,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1647,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6900269,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Emissions Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Emissions_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Emissions Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following emissions indicators did the company disclose?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">This metric assesses how much a company discloses about their emissions. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Below is a list of the metrics that are included in this assessment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Apparel Research Group+Emissions Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var m6, m7, researched;\n\n  if (m6 === \"No\") {\n    m6 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  if (m7 === \"No\") {\n    m7 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  researched = [m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7].filter(function(val) {\n    return val !== \"NR\";\n  });\n\n  numKnown(researched) / researched.length * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~826615",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~849642",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~826629",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~836651",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~814954",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~7910277",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~7910332",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 280,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 99,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Emissions_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Emissions_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6901749,
      "name": "Walk Free+Meets Minimum UK MSA Requirements",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_UK_MSA_Requirements.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Meets Minimum UK MSA Requirements",
      "question": "Does the company meet the minimum legal requirements of the UK Modern Slavery Act?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Formula logic:</p>\r\n<p>If the company:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>provides a homepage link to their modern slavery statement (any year), and</li>\r\n<li>the statement has been explicitly approved by the board of directors, and</li>\r\n<li>the statement has been signed by the appropriate person (CEO, Director, Managing Director, or Chairman)</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Then \"Yes\" they did meet the minimum requirements of the UK MSA. </p>\r\n<p>If they did not meet one or multiple of the criteria listed above, then \"No\" they did not meet the minimum requirements of the UK MSA.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Yes - but statement partially assessed",
        "Yes - but non-UK statement",
        "No",
        "No - but statement partially assessed",
        "No - but non-UK statement"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var c1, c2, c3, c4, c5, c6, c7, m3Options, statement;\n\n  m3Options = [\"Signed by CEO\", \"Signed by Director\", \"Signed by Managing Director\", \"Signed by Chairman\"];\n\n  c1 = uk_msa_assessed === \"Yes\";\n\n  c2 = m1 === \"Yes\";\n\n  c3 = m2 === \"Approved by Board\";\n\n  c4 = [m3].flat().filter(function(v) {\n    return m3Options.includes(v);\n  }).length;\n\n  statement = [statement].flat();\n\n  c5 = isKnown(statement) && (statement.includes(\"Yes - UK Modern Slavery Act\"));\n\n  c6 = isKnown(statement) && (statement.includes(\"Yes - Australian Modern Slavery Act\"));\n\n  c7 = isKnown(statement) && (statement.includes(\"Yes - California Transparency in Supply Chains Act\"));\n\n  if (c2 && c3 && c4) {\n    if (c1 && c5) {\n      \"Yes\";\n    } else if (c6 || c7) {\n      \"Yes - but non-UK statement\";\n    } else {\n      \"Yes - but statement partially assessed\";\n    }\n  } else if (c5 && (m1 !== \"Unknown\")) {\n    if (c1) {\n      \"No\";\n    } else {\n      \"No - but statement partially assessed\";\n    }\n  } else if ((c6 || c7) && (m1 !== \"Unknown\")) {\n    \"No - but non-UK statement\";\n  } else {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1827915",
          "name": "m2"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1831852",
          "name": "m3"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~7046195",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1827651",
          "name": "statement"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~12602618",
          "name": "uk_msa_assessed"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3768,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2212,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_UK_MSA_Requirements+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6908650,
      "name": "Walk Free+Human Rights investment policy (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Human_Rights_investment_policy_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Human Rights investment policy (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the investor disclose in its modern slavery statement that it has a human rights investment policy covering any portfolios under management?\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Investors have [[https://www.unpri.org/policy/fiduciary-duty|fiduciary duties]] to incorporate Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) considerations into investment decisions to ensure long-term sustainability and financial growth over maximising short-term profits.</p>\r\n<p>Part of the 'S' can include human rights policies that applies to investment decisions and portfolios under management. Examples of these types of policy include exclusionary policies.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">This metric was developed by </span>Walk Free, Wikirate, and the Business &amp; Human Rights Resource Centre, to assess the statements produced by 91 asset managers identified as having to report under the UK Modern Slavery Act. For more information, please visit the [[https://www.walkfree.org/projects/strengthening-supply-chain-transparency/|project page]].</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Does the investor disclose it <strong>has a human rights investment policy covering any portfolios</strong> under management?</p>\r\n<p>Examples include any form of policy that applies to investment decisions or portfolios under management, such as exclusionary or divestment policies. The policy must refer to human rights, or relevant synonyms such as modern slavery, or labour rights.</p>\r\n<p>If the company discloses that it has a human rights investment policy, please indicate <strong>“Yes”</strong>, and provide details.</p>\r\n<p>If no such policy exists or is described in the statement, please select <strong>\"No\"</strong>.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 295,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 147,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MS_Due_Diligence_Processes_in_Investments_sector_specific.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Considers_MS_Risks_in_Investments_sector_specific.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Human_Rights_investment_policy_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6908670,
      "name": "Walk Free+Cascading reporting obligations under MSA (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Cascading_reporting_obligations_under_MSA_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Cascading reporting obligations under MSA (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the investor disclose in its modern slavery statement that it requires investee companies to meet their reporting obligations under the UK Modern Slavery Act?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Requiring investee companies to meet their reporting obligations under modern slavery legislation helps investors not only gain greater visibility of their supply chains, but also pushes for more transparency across multiple sectors.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">This metric was developed by </span>Walk Free, Wikirate, and the Business &amp; Human Rights Resource Centre, to assess the statements produced by 91 asset managers identified as having to report under the UK Modern Slavery Act. For more information, please visit the [[https://www.walkfree.org/projects/strengthening-supply-chain-transparency/|project page]].</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Does the investor disclose it <strong>requires investee companies to meet their reporting obligations under the UK Modern Slavery Act</strong>? </p>\r\n<p>To meet this metric, the statement must mention the following:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Reporting obligations: This refers to producing a modern slavery statement, when the investee is caught under the scope of the Modern Slavery Act.</li>\r\n<li>Requires: The investor must disclose that they <strong>require</strong>, rather than expect, investees to fulfill these reporting obligations.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>If the company discloses that it requires investee companies to meet their reporting obligations under the UK Modern Slavery Act, please indicate <strong>“Yes”</strong>, and provide details.</p>\r\n<p>If no obligation exists or is described in the statement, please select <strong>\"No\"</strong>.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 296,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 147,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MS_Due_Diligence_Processes_in_Investments_sector_specific.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Considers_MS_Risks_in_Investments_sector_specific.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Cascading_reporting_obligations_under_MSA_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6908693,
      "name": "Walk Free+Assesses MS risks of investee companies (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Assesses_MS_risks_of_investee_companies_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Assesses MS risks of investee companies (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the investor disclose in its modern slavery statement that it assesses investee companies prior to investment to identify potential modern slavery risk areas? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>As part of active engagement, investors should assess a company prior to investing in order to determine any potential modern slavery risks. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">This metric was developed by </span>Walk Free, Wikirate, and the Business &amp; Human Rights Resource Centre, to assess the statements produced by 91 asset managers identified as having to report under the UK Modern Slavery Act. For more information, please visit the [[https://www.walkfree.org/projects/strengthening-supply-chain-transparency/|project page]].</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt;\">Does the investor disclose it <strong>assesses investee companies prior to investment</strong> to identify potential modern slavery risk areas?</span></p>\r\n<p>To meet this metric, the statement must mention that the investor assesses, or has assessed, investee companies <strong>prior to investment</strong> in terms of modern slavery risks. <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">The assessment <strong>must be targeted towards modern slavery risks</strong>, not just broader human rights issues. </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">This does not include ongoing monitoring, engagement, or assessment throughout the business relationship with the investee. This assessment can be negative (screening out of high risk companies) or positive (deliberately selecting 'ethical' investees). </span></p>\r\n<p>Please note that this metric refers to the assessment of investee companies, not suppliers. Assessment of risks relating to suppliers is covered under metrics such as the [[https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free_Foundation+MSA_risk_assessment?filter%5Bproject%5D=UK+Modern+Slavery+Act+Research&amp;filter%5Bstatus%5D=all|MSA risk assessment]].</p>\r\n<p>If the company discloses that it assesses investee companies prior to investment for modern slavery risks, please indicate <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">“Yes”</span>, and provide details.</p>\r\n<p>If no pre-assessment exists or is described in the statement, please select <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">\"No\"</span>.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 295,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 147,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MS_Due_Diligence_Processes_in_Investments_sector_specific.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Considers_MS_Risks_in_Investments_sector_specific.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Assesses_MS_risks_of_investee_companies_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6908714,
      "name": "Walk Free+Engagement on MS with investee companies (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Engagement_on_MS_with_investee_companies_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Engagement on MS with investee companies (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the investor disclose in its modern slavery statement active engagement with investee companies on their (investee companies’) modern slavery/ labour exploitation/ human trafficking risks in value chains and business relationships? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Investors conduct due diligence in their investments by actively engaging with investee companies, either directly or through intermediaries. This continuous engagement helps investors to understand and address <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">modern slavery risks in their investees' value chains and business relationships.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">This metric was developed by </span>Walk Free, Wikirate, and the Business &amp; Human Rights Resource Centre, to assess the statements produced by 91 asset managers identified as having to report under the UK Modern Slavery Act. For more information, please visit the [[https://www.walkfree.org/projects/strengthening-supply-chain-transparency/|project page]].</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Does the investor disclose <strong>stewardship or </strong><strong>active engagement, either directly or through intermediaries, with investee companies</strong> on their (investee companies’) modern slavery/ labour exploitation/ human trafficking risks in value chains and business relationships?</p>\r\n<p>Relevant engagement can include:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Engagement with current or potential investees</li>\r\n<li>Files or supports shareholder resolutions / voting at shareholder meetings</li>\r\n<li>Direct roles on investee boards and board committees</li>\r\n<li>Engagement policy/ Leverage policy</li>\r\n<li>Litigation</li>\r\n<li>On-site visits, social audits, or self-assessment reviews</li>\r\n<li>Civil society monitoring</li>\r\n<li>Training</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>[[https://www.unpri.org/stewardship/about-stewardship/6268.article|PRI defines stewardship]]as: \"the use of influence by institutional investors to maximise overall long-term value including the value of common economic, social and environmental assets, on which returns and clients' and beneficiaries' interests depend.\" </p>\r\n<p>Please note that this engagement is with investee companies, not suppliers. Supplier engagement is covered under metrics such as the [[https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free_Foundation+MSA_risk_management_revised?filter%5Bproject%5D=UK+Modern+Slavery+Act+Research&amp;filter%5Bstatus%5D=all|MSA risk management (revised)]]. </p>\r\n<p>Synonyms for modern slavery include human trafficking, labour exploitation or forced labour.</p>\r\n<p>If the company discloses that it actively engages, either directly or through intermediaries, with investee companies on modern slavery, please indicate <strong>“Yes”</strong>, and provide details.</p>\r\n<p>If no engagement exists or is described in the statement, please select <strong>\"No\"</strong>.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 295,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 147,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MS_Due_Diligence_Processes_in_Investments_sector_specific.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Considers_MS_Risks_in_Investments_sector_specific.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Engagement_on_MS_with_investee_companies_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6914234,
      "name": "Walk Free+MS Due Diligence Processes in Investments (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MS_Due_Diligence_Processes_in_Investments_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MS Due Diligence Processes in Investments (sector specific)",
      "question": "Did the investor disclose in their modern slavery statement that they are conducting some form of due diligence on human rights or modern slavery issues in their portfolios?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if ([m1, m2, m3, m4].flat().includes(\"Yes\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~6908650"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~6908670"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~6908693"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~6908714"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 294,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 147,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MS_Due_Diligence_Processes_in_Investments_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6914295,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA whistleblowing mechanism (binary)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_whistleblowing_mechanism_binary.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA whistleblowing mechanism (binary)",
      "question": "Does the company describe a grievance mechanism to facilitate whistle-blowing or the reporting of suspected incidents of slavery or trafficking?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": "{\r\n  \"Yes\": \"Yes\",\r\n  \"No\": \"No\",\r\n  \"Unknown\": \"Unknown\"\r\n}",
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var optionsNo, optionsYes;\n\n  optionsYes = [\"Hotline (direct employees)\", \"Hotline (supply chain workers)\", \"Focal Point (direct employees)\", \"Focal Point (supply chain workers)\"];\n\n  optionsNo = [\"Whistleblower protection (direct employees)\", \"Whistleblower protection (supply chain workers)\", \"In Development (direct employees)\", \"In Development (supply chain workers)\", \"No\"];\n\n  if (optionsYes.filter(function(v) {\n    return m1.includes(v);\n  }).length) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (optionsNo.filter(function(v) {\n    return m1.includes(v);\n  }).length) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722458",
          "name": "m1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 4374,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 2705,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Grievance_Mechanisms.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_whistleblowing_mechanism_binary+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6915789,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+MSA Statement Approval (binary)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+MSA_Statement_Approval_binary.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "MSA Statement Approval (binary)",
      "question": "Was the company's Modern Slavery Act statement explicitly approved by the board of directors (or equivalent management body)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var opts;\n\n  opts = [\"Approved - not by Board\", \"Approval not explicit in statement\"];\n\n  if ([m1].flat().filter(function(v) {\n    return opts.includes(v);\n  }).length) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Yes\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~1827915"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 4183,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2523,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+MSA_Statement_Approval_binary+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6915800,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+MSA statement signed (binary)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+MSA_statement_signed_binary.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "MSA statement signed (binary)",
      "question": "Was the company’s Modern Slavery Act statement signed by an appropriate person?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var opts;\n\n  opts = [\"Signed by CEO\", \"Signed by Director\", \"Signed by Managing Director\", \"Signed by Chairman\"];\n\n  if ([m1].flat().filter(function(v) {\n    return opts.includes(v);\n  }).length) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~1831852",
          "name": "m1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 9253,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 7352,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+MSA_statement_signed_binary+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6915846,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA policy applicable beyond tier 1 (binary)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_policy_applicable_beyond_tier_1_binary.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA policy applicable beyond tier 1 (binary)",
      "question": "Does the company’s modern slavery statement detail specific, organisational policies or actions to combat slavery in their beyond tier 1 supply chains?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var options;\n\n  options = [\"Suppliers comply with laws and company’s policies (beyond tier 1)\", \"Prohibit use of forced labour (beyond tier 1)\", \"Code of conduct or supplier code includes clauses on slavery and human trafficking (beyond tier 1)\", \"Contracts include clauses on forced labour (beyond tier 1)\", \"Suppliers produce their own statement (beyond tier 1)\", \"Prohibit charging of recruitment fees to employee (beyond tier 1)\", \"Prohibit use of child labour (beyond tier 1)\", \"Suppliers protect migrant workers (beyond tier 1)\"];\n\n  if ([m1].flat().filter(function(v) {\n    return options.includes(v);\n  }).length) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~2722057"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3934,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2339,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Policy_grouped.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_policy_applicable_beyond_tier_1_binary+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6915857,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA policy applicable to tier 1 (binary)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_policy_applicable_to_tier_1_binary.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA policy applicable to tier 1 (binary)",
      "question": "Does the company’s modern slavery statement detail specific, organisational policies or actions to combat slavery in their tier 1 supply chains?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var options;\n\n  options = [\"Suppliers comply with laws and company’s policies (direct / tier 1)\", \"Prohibit use of forced labour (direct / tier 1)\", \"Code of conduct or supplier code includes clauses on slavery and human trafficking (direct / tier 1)\", \"Contracts include clauses on forced labour (direct / tier 1)\", \"Suppliers produce their own statement (direct / tier 1)\", \"Prohibit charging of recruitment fees to employee (direct / tier 1)\", \"Prohibit use of child labour (direct / tier 1)\", \"Suppliers protect migrant workers (direct / tier 1)\"];\n\n  if ([m1].flat().filter(function(v) {\n    return options.includes(v);\n  }).length) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~2722057"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3934,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2339,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Policy_grouped.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_policy_applicable_to_tier_1_binary+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6915917,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA risk assessment & risk identified (binary)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_risk_assessment_risk_identified_binary.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA risk assessment & risk identified (binary)",
      "question": "Did the company describe in their modern slavery statement how they conduct their risk assessment AND what risks were identified?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var intersect, m1Options, m2Options;\n\n  intersect = function(array1, array2) {\n    return [array1].flat().filter(function(v) {\n      return array2.includes(v);\n    }).length;\n  };\n\n  m1Options = [\"Risk-based questionnaires\", \"Use of risk management tool or software\", \"Conducting research\"];\n\n  m2Options = [\"Geographic\", \"Industry\", \"Resource\", \"Workforce\"];\n\n  if (intersect(m1, m1Options) && intersect(m2, m2Options)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (m1.includes(\"Unknown\") && m2.includes(\"Unknown\")) {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722223",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1831932",
          "name": "m2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 4044,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2378,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_risk_assessment_risk_identified_binary+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6915949,
      "name": "Walk Free+Asset Managers: AUM Range",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Asset_Managers_AUM_Range.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Asset Managers: AUM Range",
      "question": "In which Assets Under Management (AUM) range does the investor fall?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>High is over 1 trillion USD</p>\r\n<p>Medium is between 200 billion and 1 trillion USD</p>\r\n<p>Low is below 200 billion USD</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "High",
        "Medium",
        "Low"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Asset_Managers_AUM_Range+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6915961,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA supply chain due diligence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_supply_chain_due_diligence.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA supply chain due diligence",
      "question": "Did the company disclose in their modern slavery statement that they are conducting some form of due diligence on modern slavery issues in their supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var containsAny, m1Opts, m2Opts;\n\n  m1Opts = [\"Audits of suppliers (self- reporting)\", \"Audits of suppliers (independent)\", \"On-site visits (self- reporting)\", \"On-site visits (independent)\"];\n\n  m2Opts = [\"Worker remediation\", \"Corrective action plan\", \"Senior management\", \"Cancel contracts\", \"Remediation is mentioned but no details of the process or measures\"];\n\n  containsAny = function(metric, options) {\n    return [metric].flat().filter(function(v) {\n      return options.includes(v);\n    }).length;\n  };\n\n  if (containsAny(m1, m1Opts) || containsAny(m2, m2Opts)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (m1.includes(\"Unknown\") && m2.includes(\"Unknown\")) {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722169",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722444",
          "name": "m2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3768,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2236,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_supply_chain_due_diligence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6915971,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+1.2 Publication of scope 1 & 2 emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_2_Publication_of_scope_1_2_emissions.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "1.2 Publication of scope 1 & 2 emissions",
      "question": "How does the company measure and publish the carbon footprint of its own emissions (scope 1 and 2)?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of the Eticonsum research study on the evaluation of companies in the Retail Food sector in environmental, social and ethical matters.</p>\r\n<p>Eticonsum is a non-profit market research agency specialized in corporate performance ESG (environment, social, governance) applied to consumer knowledge.</p>\r\n<p>We research and analyze the ethical market of the FMCG sector and evaluate the environmental and social performance of companies in order to help both conscious consumers to decide according to their values, and companies to compete on ethical reputation.</p>\r\n<p>With this metric we evaluate how the company measures and publishes its scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which we classify as:</p>\r\n<p><strong>Scope 1:</strong></p>\r\n<p>This scope covers direct GHG emissions, from sources that are owned or controlled by the organization, such as refrigerant gases, diesel or natural gas.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Scope 2:</strong></p>\r\n<p>Scope 2 considers indirect GHG gas emissions from the generation and use of electricity.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6519900",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6519944",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6519933",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6519911",
          "weight": "25.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_Climate_Change.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+1_2_Publication_of_scope_1_2_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6916105,
      "name": "Walk Free+Considers MS Risks in Investments (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Considers_MS_Risks_in_Investments_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Considers MS Risks in Investments (sector specific)",
      "question": "Did the investor disclose in their modern slavery statement that they are conducting some form of due diligence on human rights or modern slavery issues in their portfolios and/or that it collaborates with industry and non-industry stakeholders on the topic of modern slavery?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if ([m1, m2, m3, m4, m5].flat().includes(\"Yes\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if ([m1, m2, m3, m4, m5].flat().every((function(_this) {\n    return function(v) {\n      return v === \"Unknown\";\n    };\n  })(this))) {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~6908650",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~6908670",
          "name": "m2"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~6908693",
          "name": "m3"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~6908714",
          "name": "m4"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~15850813",
          "name": "m5"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 269,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 127,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Considers_MS_Risks_in_Investments_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6916200,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Risk assessment but none identified (binary)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Risk_assessment_but_none_identified_binary.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Risk assessment but none identified (binary)",
      "question": "Did the company describe in their modern slavery statement how they conduct their risk assessment but refrain from disclosing the risks that were identified?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var options;\n\n  options = [\"Risk-based questionnaires\", \"Use of risk management tool or software\", \"Conducting research\"];\n\n  if ([m1].flat().filter(function(v) {\n    return options.includes(v);\n  }).length && m2 === \"No\") {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~2722223"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~6916242"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3912,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2326,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Risk_assessment_but_none_identified_binary+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6916242,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Identification of risks (binary)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Identification_of_risks_binary.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Identification of risks (binary)",
      "question": "Does the company’s statement identify specific geographic regions (e.g. Indonesia), industries (e.g. agriculture), resources (e.g. Palm Oil) or types of workforce (e.g. migrant workers) where the risk of modern slavery is the greatest?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var options;\n\n  options = [\"Geographic\", \"Industry\", \"Resource\", \"Workforce\"];\n\n  if ([m1].flat().filter(function(v) {\n    return options.includes(v);\n  }).length) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~1831932",
          "name": "m1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 4021,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2375,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Risk_assessment_but_none_identified_binary.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Risk_assessment_categories.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Identification_of_risks_binary+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6921161,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Zero waste in some establishments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_waste_in_some_establishments.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Zero waste in some establishments",
      "question": "The company is declared and/or certified as zero waste in more than 10 of its facilities.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>We consider it a very important first step for retailers to start certifying at least part of their establishments as zero waste.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We will \"assign a\" \"YES\" \"to this question if:</p>\r\n<p>- The company has reached the category of \"\" zero waste \"\", either through a certification such as AENOR \"\" Zero waste \"\" or through the management of a specialized external company (for example Saica Natur in the case of Auchan Spain) in at least 10 of its facilities.</p>\r\n<p>These can be logistics platforms or stores both in Spain and in foreign subsidiaries</p>\r\n<p>We will assign a \"NO\" if:</p>\r\n<p>- If the company has an international presence and meet this condition only in a country outside of Spain. Or:</p>\r\n<p>- If the company is certified \"\" zero residue \"\" only in some points of sale in Spain. Or:</p>\r\n<p>- We did not find any statement in this regard. Or:</p>\r\n<p>- The company declares that it has revalued at least 90% of its waste, but does not have any certification or external company to verify this.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>This information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:</p>\r\n<p>- Annual memory</p>\r\n<p>- Corporate Social Responsibility Report</p>\r\n<p>- Sustainability Report</p>\r\n<p>- Environmental Report</p>\r\n<p>- Report on Carbon Footprint</p>\r\n<p>- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF) </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Research Group Eticonsum+Zero waste in some establishments+Luis Leyton"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_waste_in_some_establishments+Luis_Leyton.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_waste_in_some_establishments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6921531,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Zero waste in some establishments+Luis Leyton",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_waste_in_some_establishments+Luis_Leyton.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Zero waste in some establishments",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"2.1 Waste reduction and prevention\"\"</p>\r\n<p>With this metric we aim to assess companies' efforts in waste reduction and waste prevention</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Unknown\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+2_1_Waste_reduction_and_prevention.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Zero_waste_in_some_establishments+Luis_Leyton+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6933622,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Risk assessment categories",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Risk_assessment_categories.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Risk assessment categories",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Performs assessment and identifies risks",
        "Performs assessment but does not identify risks",
        "Does not perform assessment or identify risks",
        "Does not perform assessment but identifies risks"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var opts;\n\n  opts = [\"Risk-based questionnaires\", \"Use of risk management tool or software\", \"Conducting research\"];\n\n  if (m1.includes(\"Unknown\") && m2.includes(\"Unknown\")) {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  } else if ([m1].flat().filter(function(v) {\n    return opts.includes(v);\n  }).length) {\n    if (m2 === \"No\") {\n      \"Performs assessment but does not identify risks\";\n    } else {\n      \"Performs assessment and identifies risks\";\n    }\n  } else {\n    if (m2 === \"No\") {\n      \"Does not perform assessment or identify risks\";\n    } else {\n      \"Does not perform assessment but identifies risks\";\n    }\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722223",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~6916242",
          "name": "m2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3912,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2326,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Risk_assessment_categories+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6940576,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Audit on Animal Welfare to Suppliers+Luis Leyton",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Audit_on_Animal_Welfare_to_Suppliers+Luis_Leyton.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Audit on Animal Welfare to Suppliers",
      "question": "How does the company score for this indicator in the Eticonsum Planet Assessment - Supermarkets ?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : \"\"6.3 Animal welfare in the supply chain \"\"</p>\r\n<p>With this metric we aim to publicise and compare the efforts of the main distributors in Spain in applying their animal welfare policy to their supply chain, focusing mainly on :</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>- carrying out audits and inspections of major suppliers</p>\r\n<p>- support and training of suppliers on animal welfare</p>\r\n<p>- animal welfare requirements for non-branded suppliers</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Unknown\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+6_3_Animal_welfare_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Audit_on_Animal_Welfare_to_Suppliers+Luis_Leyton+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6940921,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Environmental Performance",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Environmental_Performance.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Environmental Performance",
      "question": "What score do the main supermarkets in Spain obtain according to their environmental performance disclosed in their reports?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Esta métrica forma parte del estudio de investigación de Eticonsum sobre la evaluación de las mayores cadenas de alimentación en España en materia medioambiental, social y ética.</span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Eticonsum es una agencia de investigación de mercado sin fines de lucro especializada en desempeño corporativo ESG (medioambiental, social, gobernanza) aplicado al conocimiento del consumidor.</span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Investigamos y analizamos el mercado ético del sector de bienes de consumo y evaluamos el desempeño ambiental y social de las empresas con el fin de ayudar tanto a los consumidores conscientes a decidir según sus valores, como a las empresas a competir en reputación ética.</span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Las empresas son evaluadas en base a toda su información publicada sobre desempeño extra-financiero, entre los que se encuentran sus Informes de Responsabilidad Social Corporativa, Informes Anuales, Códigos de Conducta, Informes de Sostenibilidad, Directiva de Informes No Financieros de la UE (NFRD ) de acuerdo con la Ley 11 /. </span><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">2018, etc. ...</span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Dependiendo del aspecto a evaluar y de forma puntual, complementamos la información obtenida con fuentes de terceros como ONGs, asociaciones de consumidores, Tribunales de Justicia, organismos de supervisión, comunicados de prensa entre otros.</span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Creemos que estos informes, con todo su potencial de mejora, ofrecen una gran cantidad de información válida y reveladora sobre el desempeño y transparencia de las empresas en materia ambiental, social y ética y son hoy su principal herramienta integral de divulgación y verificación a disposición de sus grupos de interés. </span><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">.</span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Nuestra misión en este sentido es democratizar el acceso e interpretación de estos informes e intentar traducirlos en un esquema de indicadores comparables que, complementado con otros indicadores menos estandarizados y específicos para cada sector de actividad, permitir a cualquier usuario desarrollar su propio ranking basado en sus prioridades de evaluación eco-social</span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Eticonsum se une a la plataforma de datos abierta e interactiva Wikirate para hacer accesibles sus rankings y evaluaciones a cualquier investigador, usuario o partes interesadas de la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa.</span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\"><span style=\"vertical-align: inherit;\">Wikirate nos permite poner nuestras metodologías de evaluación a disposición de los colaboradores que quieran ampliar el alcance de nuestros rankings a más empresas y sectores, así como comprobar o incluso cuestionar el rigor y la veracidad de su información.</span></span></span></span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Use of Carbon Offsets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Food Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Education Initiatives",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6891907",
          "weight": "25"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6891962",
          "weight": "20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892044",
          "weight": "10"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892081",
          "weight": "5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892118",
          "weight": "20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6892191",
          "weight": "20"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Environmental_Performance+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6946370,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA KPIs (combined)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_KPIs_combined.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA KPIs (combined)",
      "question": "Does the modern slavery statement define performance indicators against which the company measures 1) the effectiveness of its actions to combat slavery and trafficking, and/or 2) how it's changing business operations might be increasing the risk of modern slavery?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Effectiveness KPIs",
        "Business KPIs",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var vals;\n\n  vals = [];\n\n  if (m1 === \"Yes\") {\n    vals.push(\"Effectiveness KPIs\");\n  }\n\n  if (m2 === \"Yes\") {\n    vals.push(\"Business KPIs\");\n  }\n\n  if (m1.includes(\"Unknown\") && m2.includes(\"Unknown\")) {\n    vals.push(\"Unknown\");\n  }\n\n  if (!vals.length) {\n    vals = \"No\";\n  }\n\n  vals;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1832024",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1832012",
          "name": "m2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3884,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2328,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_KPIs_combined+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6948944,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA risk management (grouped)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_risk_management_grouped.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA risk management (grouped)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Audits of suppliers (self- reporting)",
        "Audits of suppliers (independent)",
        "On-site visits (self- reporting)",
        "On-site visits (independent)",
        "Neither (self- reporting)",
        "Neither (independent)"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var ind, m1, self;\n\n  m1 = [m1].flat();\n\n  self = m1.filter(function(v) {\n    return v.match(\"self\");\n  });\n\n  ind = m1.filter(function(v) {\n    return v.match(\"independent\");\n  });\n\n  if (!self.length) {\n    self = [\"Neither (self- reporting)\"];\n  }\n\n  if (!ind.length) {\n    ind = [\"Neither (independent)\"];\n  }\n\n  [self, ind].flat();\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~2722169"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3921,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2339,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_risk_management_grouped+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6948985,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Risk Assessment (grouped)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Risk_Assessment_grouped.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Risk Assessment (grouped)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": "{\r\n  \"Risk-based questionnaires\" : \"Risk-based questionnaires\",\r\n  \"Use of risk management tool or software\" : \"Use of risk management tool or software\",\r\n  \"Conducting desk research\": \"Conducting research\",\r\n  \"None of the Above\": \"None\"\r\n} ",
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var dropOption, options;\n\n  options = [\"Risk-based questionnaires\", \"Use of risk management tool or software\", \"Conducting research\"];\n\n  dropOption = \"In Development\";\n\n  if ([m1].flat().filter(function(v) {\n    return options.includes(v);\n  }).length) {\n    m1.filter(function(v) {\n      return v !== dropOption;\n    });\n  } else {\n    \"None\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~2722223"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3937,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2336,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Risk_Assessment_grouped+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6949027,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Identification of risks (grouped)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Identification_of_risks_grouped.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Identification of risks (grouped)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Geographic",
        "Industry",
        "Resource",
        "Workforce",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var dropOption, options;\n\n  options = [\"Geographic\", \"Industry\", \"Resource\", \"Workforce\"];\n\n  dropOption = \"In Development\";\n\n  if ([m1].flat().filter(function(v) {\n    return options.includes(v);\n  }).length) {\n    m1.filter(function(v) {\n      return v !== dropOption;\n    });\n  } else {\n    \"None\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~1831932"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 4022,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 2375,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Identification_of_risks_grouped+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6962981,
      "name": "Gender Data Research+Prohibits violence & harassment in supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Gender_Data_Research+Prohibits_violence_harassment_in_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Gender Data Research",
      "title": "Prohibits violence & harassment in supply chain",
      "question": "Does the company prohibit violence and harassment in its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was created to gather information on companies' policies in their supply chains.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This information can be found in a company's <strong>Supplier or Vendor Code of Conduct</strong>, on it's website, or in annual and sustainability reports. </p>\r\n<p>Key search terms: Violence, Harassment</p>\r\n<p>Answer options:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Yes</strong>: If the company reports a prohibition of violence and harassment <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">(or equivalent) </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">in its supply chain, answer Yes.</span></li>\r\n<li><strong>No</strong>: If no such information is found in the correct documents, answer No. </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Unknown is only an option for companies which have no reports or website available.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 49,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 35,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Gender_Data_Research+Prohibits_violence_harassment_in_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6966022,
      "name": "Gender Data Research+Gender Equality Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Gender_Data_Research+Gender_Equality_Targets.json",
      "designer": "Gender Data Research",
      "title": "Gender Equality Targets",
      "question": "Does the company specify targets on gender equality and women’s empowerment in operations (for example 50% of women in leadership positions by 2025)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was created to gather information on what kinds of targets companies are setting themselves related to women's empowerment and gender equality in their own operations and in the supply chain.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This information can be found in a company's <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Annual or Sustainability Report</span>, on it's website, or in annual and sustainability reports. </p>\r\n<p>Key search terms: Target, Goal, Gender Equality, Women, Empowerment</p>\r\n<p><strong>Answer options</strong>: Multiple answer options can be selected. If a relevant target has been found and the category is not listed in the options, select <strong>Other</strong>, and include the target in the comments field.</p>\r\n<p>If no targets are found, select <strong>No</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>Unknown is only an option for companies which have no reports or website available.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Women in leadership",
        "Women on board",
        "Equal pay",
        "Health care",
        "Parental leave",
        "Training",
        "Access to childcare services",
        "Empowerment targets for supply chain",
        "Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 99,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 81,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Gender_Data_Research+Gender_Equality_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6966591,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA incidents remediation (binary)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_incidents_remediation_binary.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA incidents remediation (binary)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var opts;\n\n  opts = [\"Worker remediation\", \"Corrective action plan\", \"Senior management\", \"Cancel contracts\"];\n\n  if ([m1].flat().filter(function(v) {\n    return opts.includes(v);\n  }).length) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~2722444",
          "name": "m1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 4558,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2878,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_incidents_remediation_binary+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 6966599,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA training (binary)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_training_binary.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA training (binary)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var opts;\n\n  opts = [\"Employees (all)\", \"Procurement / purchasing\", \"Recruitment / HR\", \"Leadership\", \"Suppliers\", \"Training provided - not specified\"];\n\n  if ([m1].flat().filter(function(v) {\n    return opts.includes(v);\n  }).length) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~2722482"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 4038,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2438,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_training_binary+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7046195,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA statement homepage link",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_statement_homepage_link.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA statement homepage link",
      "question": "Does the company have a MSA statement AND link to it from its homepage?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"No - neither\")) {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  } else if ((isKnown(m1) && m2 === \"Yes\") || (isKnown(m1) && m3 === \"Yes\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1827651",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1827673",
          "name": "m2"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~12536905",
          "name": "m3"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 72195,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 26910,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Statement_Publication.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_UK_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_statement_homepage_link+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7046212,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Living Wage Estimate (EUR equivalent)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wage_Estimate_EUR_equivalent.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Living Wage Estimate (EUR equivalent)",
      "question": "What is the estimated living wage in euro equivalent for workers at this company/facility?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context. </span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</span><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Clean Clothes Campaign defines a </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">living wage</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> as wage that is 'earned in a standard working week of no more than 48 hours and allows the garment worker to be able to buy food for herself and her family, pay the rent, pay for healthcare, clothing, transportation and education and have a small amount of savings for when something unexpected happens.' (Source: [[https://cleanclothes.org/living-wages|CCC]])</span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The figures used to answer this metric come from the<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Asia Floor Wage Alliance, the WageIndicator Foundation and the Europe Floor Wage Benchmark</span>, an initiative of Clean Clothes Campaign, and have been converted from the national currency of the facility/company into Euros using the relevant yearly average exchange rate.<br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Please note that this metric can only be researched through consultation with the metric designer and therefore cannot be included in desk research projects.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "EUR",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 867,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 257,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wage_Gap_Actual_Wages_as_of_Living_Wage_Benchmark.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wage_Estimate_EUR_equivalent+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7046260,
      "name": "Core+ILO Region",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+ILO_Region.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "ILO Region",
      "question": "In which region (as defined by the International Labour Organization) is the company primarily based? ",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Source: https://www.ilo.org/global/regions/lang--en/index.htm</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Africa",
        "Americas",
        "Arab States",
        "Asia and the Pacific",
        "Europe and Central Asia",
        "Needs Mapping"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  iloRegion(m1);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5456201"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 138733,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 138731,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+ILO_Region+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7161919,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+RDR Total Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+RDR_Total_Score.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "RDR Total Score",
      "question": "Total score received by the main tech companies for their \"Governance\", \"Freedom of Expression\" and \"Privacy\" in the \"Ranking Digital Rights Corporate Accountability Index\".",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This metric has been created to be able to view the results of the Ranking Digital Right Index (RDR) on the Eticonsum platform.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\"The 2019 Ranking Digital Rights Corporate Accountability Index evaluated 24 of the world's most powerful internet, mobile and telecommunications companies on their disclosed commitments and policies affecting freedom of expression and privacy of internet users across the world. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Now in its fourth iteration, the RDR Index has continued to expand each year. Beginning in 2015, RDR evaluated 16 internet and telecommunications companies using 31 indicators. Then in 2017, RDR evaluated 22 telecommunications, mobile and internet companies using a revised methodology made up of 35 indicators. Now the fourth edition of the RDR Index has grown to include two more companies, for a total of 24, and RDR is planning to once again revise its methodology and add companies for the next edition of the ranking, scheduled for 2021. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Companies' total score consists of the accumulated scores they received across all indicators in the categories 'Goverance', 'Freedom of Expression' and 'Privacy'\"<br><br>For most recent full results, methodology and background, see <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/\" target=\"_blank\">https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/</a></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+AI Ethics & Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7162817",
          "weight": "100.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 123,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 26,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+RDR_Total_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7162817,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+RDR Total Score/10",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+RDR_Total_Score_10.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "RDR Total Score/10",
      "question": "What was the total score the company received in Ranking Digital Rights' Corporate Accountability Index?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+AI Ethics & Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~564281"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 123,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 26,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+RDR_Total_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+RDR_Total_Score_10+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7165473,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Privacy Score/10",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Privacy_Score_10.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Privacy Score/10",
      "question": "What score did Ranking Digital Rights award for Privacy?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~564597"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 123,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 26,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Privacy_Score_10+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7165483,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Governance Score/10",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Governance_Score_10.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Governance Score/10",
      "question": "What score did Ranking Digital Rights award for public commitments and disclosed policies affecting users’ freedom of expression and privacy?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~564393"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 123,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 26,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Governance_Score_10+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7165492,
      "name": "Research Group Eticonsum+Freedom of Expression/10",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Freedom_of_Expression_10.json",
      "designer": "Research Group Eticonsum",
      "title": "Freedom of Expression/10",
      "question": "What score did Ranking Digital Rights award for Freedom of Expression?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+AI Ethics & Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~564496"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 123,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 26,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Research_Group_Eticonsum+Freedom_of_Expression_10+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7269085,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Energy Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Energy_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Energy Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following energy use indicators did the company disclose?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric assesses how much a company discloses about their energy use and management. </p>\r\n<p>Below is a list of the metrics that are included in this assessment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Apparel Research Group+Energy Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var researched;\n\n  researched = [m1, m2, m3].filter(function(val) {\n    return val !== \"NR\";\n  });\n\n  numKnown(researched) / researched.length * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~846580",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~836952",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~836964",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1479,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 812,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Energy_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Energy_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7269107,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Water Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Water Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following water use metrics did the company disclose?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">This metric assesses how much a company discloses </span>about their water use and management. </p>\r\n<p>Below is a list of the metrics that are included in this assessment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Apparel Research Group+Water Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var m6, m7, m8, m9, researched;\n\n  if (m6 === \"No\") {\n    m6 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  if (m7 === \"No\") {\n    m7 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  if (m8 === \"No\") {\n    m8 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  if (m9 === \"No\") {\n    m9 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  researched = [m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, m8, m9].filter(function(val) {\n    return val !== \"NR\";\n  });\n\n  numKnown(researched) / researched.length * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~836051",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~801164",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~801317",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~1821705",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~801561",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~7910257",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~7910342",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m8",
          "metric": "~7910267",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m9",
          "metric": "~7910352",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1676,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 950,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7309885,
      "name": "Commons+Textile Mill",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Textile_Mill.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Textile Mill",
      "question": "Has this facility been identified as a textile mill? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Picking up the Threads is an effort to map the supplier relationships of textile mills to fashion brands. The project has created a centralized database of textile mills that links them to the brands and retailers they supply. </span></p>\r\n<p>This project is part of a wider push by organizations to shine a light on the more hidden parts of apparel supply chains and better understand where companies are at when it comes to disclosing their production sites beyond the first tier of the supply chain.</p>\r\n<p>Our research used publicly available sources to create a preliminary list of supply chain relationships between textile mills and brands.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">A full spreadsheet with the mill-brand relationships, industry initiative memberships, company identifiers (OpenCorporates and Open Apparel Registry) can be accessed </span><a href=\"/Source_000105479\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 16px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">. </span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 704,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 703,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Textile_Mill+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7333916,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Workforce Disclosure Rate - Own Operations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Workforce Disclosure Rate - Own Operations",
      "question": "What percentage of the following (direct) workforce indicators did the company disclose?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">This metric assesses how much a company discloses about their own workforce (excluding their supply chain workforce). </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Below is a list of the metrics that are included in this assessment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Apparel Research Group+Workforce Disclosure Rate - Own Operations+Apparel Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var researched;\n\n  researched = [m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6].filter(function(val) {\n    return val !== \"NR\";\n  });\n\n  numKnown(researched) / researched.length * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3437227",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~837241",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~5312044",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~1830298",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~3447767",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~5663400",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 296,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations+Apparel_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7333929,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Workforce Disclosure Rate - Supply Chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Workforce Disclosure Rate - Supply Chain",
      "question": "What percentage of the following (indirect) workforce indicators did the company disclose?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">This metric assesses how much a company discloses about their supply chain workforce (demographic). </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Below is a list of the metrics that are included in this assessment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Apparel Research Group+Workforce Disclosure Rate - Supply Chain+Apparel Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var numPositive, researched;\n\n  researched = [m1, m2, m3, m4].filter(function(val) {\n    return val !== \"NR\";\n  });\n\n  numPositive = researched.filter(function(val) {\n    return val > 0;\n  }).length;\n\n  numPositive / researched.length * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~7910600",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "0",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~7910611",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "0",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~7910622",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "0",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~7910633",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "0",
          "year": "latest"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1050,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 350,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Supply_Chain+Apparel_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7333941,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Terms of Employment Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Terms of Employment Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following terms of employment indicators did the company disclose?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric assesses how much a company discloses about the terms of employment for their own and supply chain workforces. </p>\r\n<p>Below is a list of the metrics that are included in this assessment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Apparel Research Group+Terms of Employment Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var all, known, m2, m3, numNo, researched, unknownIfNo;\n\n  if ([m2].flat()[0] === \"No Living Wage Policy\") {\n    m2 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  if ([m3].flat()[0] === \"No Living Wage Policy\") {\n    m3 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  unknownIfNo = [m4, m5, m6, m7, m8, m9, m10, m11, m12, m13, m14, m15, m16];\n\n  all = [m1, m2, m3].concat(unknownIfNo);\n\n  numNo = unknownIfNo.filter(function(v) {\n    return [v].flat()[0] === \"No\";\n  }).length;\n\n  researched = all.filter(function(val) {\n    return val !== \"NR\";\n  });\n\n  known = numKnown(researched) - numNo;\n\n  known / researched.length * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~813500",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3446414",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~3446430",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~5467365",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~5467379",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~5467393",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~7910137",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m8",
          "metric": "~7910372",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m9",
          "metric": "~7910147",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m10",
          "metric": "~7910382",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m11",
          "metric": "~7910157",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m12",
          "metric": "~7910392",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m13",
          "metric": "~7910167",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m14",
          "metric": "~7910402",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m15",
          "metric": "~7910177",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m16",
          "metric": "~7910412",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 196,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7335011,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Energy Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Energy_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Energy Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for energy disclosure?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. This score is here to convert the underlying data to this 10-point scale and make it comparable. To see what data is feeding into this standardized score, dig one layer deeper.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1479,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 812,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Energy_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7335017,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Water Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Water Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for water disclosure?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. This score is here to convert the underlying data to this 10-point scale and make it comparable. To see what data is feeding into this standardized score, dig one layer deeper.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1676,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 950,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7335022,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Emissions Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Emissions_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Emissions Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for emissions disclosure?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. This score is here to convert the underlying data to this 10-point scale and make it comparable. To see what data is feeding into this standardized score, dig one layer deeper.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 280,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 99,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Emissions_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7335366,
      "name": "Core+Reporting Frameworks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Reporting_Frameworks.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Reporting Frameworks",
      "question": "Which of the following national or international frameworks does the company's reporting rely on?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "GRI - Global Reporting Initiative",
        "IIRC - International Integrated Reporting Council",
        "SASB - Sustainability Accounting Standards Board",
        "UNGC - UN Global Compact",
        "UNGP - United Nations Guiding Principles Reporting Framework",
        "OECD Guidelines - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises or general or sectoral due diligence guidances",
        "European Commission Guidelines on Non-Financial Reporting",
        "SDG - United Nations Sustainable Development Goals",
        "ILO - International Labour Organization standards",
        "National standards",
        "Future-Fit Business Benchmark",
        "ISO 26000",
        "CDP environmental reporting system and framework",
        "Climate Disclosure Standards Board Framework",
        "Others",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6406852"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 303,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 303,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Reporting_Frameworks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7337046,
      "name": "MSI-TN+MSI-TN Participating Factory",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/MSI_TN+MSI_TN_Participating_Factory.json",
      "designer": "MSI-TN",
      "title": "MSI-TN Participating Factory",
      "question": "Has this factory participated in training provided by the MSI-TN and if yes, what type of facility is the factory?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>MSI- TN, Established in 2014 under the leadership of SAVE by inviting the group of NGOs, employers and Government officials at Tirupur. In 2018 expanded the scope of MSI TN under the aegis of Partnership Initiative for Sustainable Textiles aims towards systemic improvements of labour conditions in the Tamil Nadu Textile and Garment industry with a thrust to spinning sector.</p>\r\n<p>With the Secretariat in Tirupur, this initiative has its operation across the State of Tamil Nadu. The dedicated team of MSI TN comprising Programme Manager, Coordinators for Training and Dialogue, Trainers and Partner NGOs is engaged to implement in-factory training programs and social dialogue process which are necessary to ensure fair, ethical and sustainable labour practices in the spinning and garment sector.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://msi-tn.com/about\">MSI-TN</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The list of factories who have participated in MSI-TN training can be found here: <a href=\"https://msi-tn.com/factories\">https://msi-tn.com/factories</a></p>\r\n<p>Click on the 'Action' buttons next to the district names to see the full list per district. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Spinning Mill",
        "Garments",
        "Knitting",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Signatory List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/MSI_TN+MSI_TN_Participating_Factory+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7337059,
      "name": "Tamilnadu Spinning Mills Association+TASMA Member",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Tamilnadu_Spinning_Mills_Association+TASMA_Member.json",
      "designer": "Tamilnadu Spinning Mills Association",
      "title": "TASMA Member",
      "question": "Is this company a member of the Tamilnadu Spinning Mills Association? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The list of member mills of the Tamilnadu Spinning Mills Association (TASMA) can be found here: https://www.tasma.in/tasma-members</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Signatory List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Tamilnadu_Spinning_Mills_Association+TASMA_Member+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7343129,
      "name": "University of Sydney SDG Research Group 2021+Social Metrics Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2021+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "University of Sydney SDG Research Group 2021",
      "title": "Social Metrics Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following ten social indicators are disclosed? ",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Parental Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, m8, m9, m10]) * 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5312044",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~836128",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~837241",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~836097",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~815203",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~836973",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~836314",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m8",
          "metric": "~2311236",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m9",
          "metric": "~3411227",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m10",
          "metric": "~6892247",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 46737,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8572,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/University_of_Sydney_SDG_Research_Group_2021+Social_Metrics_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7347357,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Living Wage Gap - Actual Wages as % of Living Wage Benchmark",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wage_Gap_Actual_Wages_as_of_Living_Wage_Benchmark.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Living Wage Gap - Actual Wages as % of Living Wage Benchmark",
      "question": "What is the average worker wage in this facility as a percentage of the living wage benchmark for the region? ",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, [[https://cleanclothes.org/campaigns/filling-the-gap|Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency]], is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool.<br><br>The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers in Europe with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and more sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.<br><br>The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the factory worker survey portion of the research.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Clean Clothes Campaign defines a living wage as wage that is 'earned in a standard working week of no more than 48 hours and allows the garment worker to be able to buy food for herself and her family, pay the rent, pay for healthcare, clothing, transportation and education and have a small amount of savings for when something unexpected happens.' (Source: [[https://cleanclothes.org/living-wages|CCC]])</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The living wage benchmarks used in this calculation come from the <strong>Asia Floor Wage Alliance</strong>, the <strong>WageIndicator Foundation</strong> and the <strong>Europe Floor Wage Benchmark</strong>, an initiative of <strong>Clean Clothes Campaign</strong>, and have been converted from the national currency of the facility/company into Euros using the relevant yearly average exchange rate.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6019687",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7046212",
          "name": "m2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 322,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 257,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wage_Gap_Actual_Wages_as_of_Living_Wage_Benchmark+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7437458,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Recycled Input Materials (%), GRI 301-2 (formerly G4-EN2)+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Recycled_Input_Materials_GRI_301_2_formerly_G4_EN2+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Recycled Input Materials (%), GRI 301-2 (formerly G4-EN2)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  ({\n    \"Unknown\": \"0\",\n    \"else\": \"10\"\n  });\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 298,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 9,
      "companies": 208,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_India+Environmental_Disclosure_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Recycled_Input_Materials_GRI_301_2_formerly_G4_EN2+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7444932,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Supplier Disclosure (combined)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supplier_Disclosure_combined.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Supplier Disclosure (combined)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Clean Clothes Campaign+Supplier Disclosure (combined)+Clean Clothes Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var getResult;\n\n  getResult = function(m1, m2, location, address, products, parent) {\n    var opts;\n    opts = [\"Name of Facility\", \"Address\", \"Type of products or services\", \"Approximate number of workers at each site\", \"Name of Parent Company (for each facility if applicable)\"];\n    if ([\"Yes\", \"Partial\"].includes(m1)) {\n      return m1;\n    } else if ([m2].flat().filter(function(v) {\n      return opts.includes(v);\n    }).length === 5) {\n      return \"Yes\";\n    } else if ([m2].flat().some(function(v) {\n      return opts.includes(v);\n    })) {\n      return \"Partial\";\n    } else if ([location, address, products, parent].filter(function(v) {\n      return v === \"Yes\";\n    }).length === 4) {\n      return \"Yes\";\n    } else if ([location, address, products, parent].some(function(v) {\n      return v === \"Yes\";\n    })) {\n      return \"Partial\";\n    } else {\n      return \"No\";\n    }\n  };\n\n  getResult(m1, m2, location, address, products, parent);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "metric": "~5768854",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "metric": "~5821888",
          "name": "m2"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "metric": "~19689660",
          "name": "location"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "metric": "~19689670",
          "name": "address"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "metric": "~19689678",
          "name": "products"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "metric": "~19689785",
          "name": "parent"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1809,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 434,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supplier_Disclosure_combined+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supplier_Disclosure_combined+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7444942,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Environmental Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Environmental Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What is the company's score on disclosure of environmental indicators?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p>This rating <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">assesses the availability of corporate data </span>for the largest 100 apparel companies across 50+ indicators, sourced from a number of different projects on <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>. These indicators cover standard reporting measurements of <strong>environmental</strong> performance, and focus on the <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">company's policies, performance, and collaborations.</span></p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> </div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reputational Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7335017",
          "weight": "19"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7615215",
          "weight": "19"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7335011",
          "weight": "19"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7335022",
          "weight": "19"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8039245",
          "weight": "5"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8062869",
          "weight": "19"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 176,
      "bookmarkers": 5,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 99,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+ESG_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7447686,
      "name": "Top 100 Fashion Project Research Group+Science Based Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Top_100_Fashion_Project_Research_Group+Science_Based_Targets.json",
      "designer": "Top 100 Fashion Project Research Group",
      "title": "Science Based Targets",
      "question": "Does the company publish Science Based Targets for climate and/or environmental issues?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Formula logic:</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">If</span> a company's answer to 'Science Based Targets Status' <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">or</span> 'Science Based Targets' is not \"No\", then show \"Yes\". If neither are true, show \"No\". </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var opts;\n\n  opts = [\"Targets Set\", \"Committed\"];\n\n  if ((m1 === \"Yes\") || [m2].flat().filter(function(v) {\n    return opts.includes(v);\n  }).length) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5822608",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~6321616",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3607,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 1560,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Top_100_Fashion_Project_Research_Group+Science_Based_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449376,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Worker Representation on Board",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Worker_Representation_on_Board.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Worker Representation on Board",
      "question": "Does the company have worker representation on their corporate board of directors?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Worker representation on the corporate board of directors is important because it ensures worker voice is incorporated at the decision making level.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company has worker representation on their corporate board of directors. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Investor relations documents<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Contact page<br>- Company Code of Conduct<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Governance<br>- Board member<br>- Board committee<br>- Board of Directors<br>- Chair of Committee<br>- Committee<br>- Worker representative</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Worker Representation on Board+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Worker_Representation_on_Board+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Worker_Representation_on_Board+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449387,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2.3 Disclosure of Spending on Managing and Implementing CSR Activities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Disclosure_of_Spending_on_Managing_and_Implementing_CSR_Activities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2.3 Disclosure of Spending on Managing and Implementing CSR Activities",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the amount spent on CSR and sustainability efforts (including staff) as percentage of overall budget or revenue.?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Disclosing the amount spent on CSR and sustainability efforts as a percentage of overall budget or revenue serves to publicly acknowledge how the company prioritises money spent on managing and implementing CSR and sustainability activities.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to whether the company discloses the amount spent on CSR and sustainability efforts (including staff) as percentage of overall budget or revenue.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Investor relations documents<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Contact page<br>- Company Code of Conduct<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Budget<br>- Revenue<br>- Sustainability budget<br>- CSR<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Must disclose a % of overall budget as this helps to understand how important and to what extent CSR and sustainability efforts are prioritised</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+2.3 Disclosure of Spending on Managing and Implementing CSR Activities+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 323,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 323,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Disclosure_of_Spending_on_Managing_and_Implementing_CSR_Activities+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Disclosure_of_Spending_on_Managing_and_Implementing_CSR_Activities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449398,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Percentage of Audited Facilities Beyond Tier 1",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Audited_Facilities_Beyond_Tier_1.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Percentage of Audited Facilities Beyond Tier 1",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the percentage of facilities beyond tier 1 (e.g. tier 2/3/4 by which we mean processing facilities, textile mills, laundries and dye houses, suppliers of raw materials, farms) which are audited?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses the percentage of facilities beyond tier 1 (e.g. tier 2/3/4 by which we mean processing facilities, textile mills, laundries and dye houses, suppliers of raw materials, farms) which are audited. Start by looking for a description of if and how the company conducts supply chain audits or other forms of supplier assessment. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company websites<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Audit<br>- Factory visit/Assessment<br>- Supplier Compliance<br>- Social Compliance<br>- Assessment<br>- Monitoring<br>- Measurement or Performance Standards<br>- Off-site interview<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Good place to look for section 4 questions might be a company's Modern Slavery Statement or if they publish their Know The Chain response as well as their annual report.<br>- Facility-level assessment processes are typically audits</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Percentage of Audited Facilities Beyond Tier 1+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 323,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 323,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Audited_Facilities_Beyond_Tier_1+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Audited_Facilities_Beyond_Tier_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449409,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Percentage of Audits including Trade Union Representative",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Audits_including_Trade_Union_Representative.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Percentage of Audits including Trade Union Representative",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the percentage of audits which included a trade union representative?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised. Having a trade union representative present during the audit process helps ensure that workers' voice is considered during the due diligence process and effective remedy is actioned.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses the percentage of audits which included a trade union representative.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company websites<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Audit<br>- Factory visit/Assessment<br>- Supplier Compliance<br>- Social Compliance<br>- Assessment<br>- Monitoring<br>- Measurement or Performance Standards<br>- Trade union representative<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Good place to look for section 4 questions might be a company's Modern Slavery Statement or if they publish their Know The Chain response as well as their annual report.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Percentage of Audits including Trade Union Representative+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Audits_including_Trade_Union_Representative+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Audits_including_Trade_Union_Representative+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449420,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Orders Partially or Completely Cancelled (COVID-19 Response)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Orders_Partially_or_Completely_Cancelled_COVID_19_Response.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Orders Partially or Completely Cancelled (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the percentage of orders since the outbreak of COVID-19 where partial or complete order cancellations applied?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Brands purchasing practices during Covid-19 have had a huge impact on suppliers' ability to pay workers on time and adequately. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workers across global supply chains. Disclosing partial or complete order cancellations highlights brands' responses to COVID 19 and their direct impact on suppliers.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the percentage of orders since the outbreak of COVID-19 where partial or complete order cancellations applied.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Order cancellation<br>- Partial cancellation<br>- Cancellation<br>- Order<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Must disclose a % of partial or complete order cancellations</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Orders Partially or Completely Cancelled (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Orders_Partially_or_Completely_Cancelled_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Orders_Partially_or_Completely_Cancelled_COVID_19_Response+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449431,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Orders Cancelled and Not Paid in Full (COVID-19 Response)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Orders_Cancelled_and_Not_Paid_in_Full_COVID_19_Response.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Orders Cancelled and Not Paid in Full (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the percentage of orders since the outbreak of COVID-19 that have been cancelled and not been reinstated and paid in full?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Brands purchasing practices during Covid-19 have had a huge impact on suppliers' ability to pay workers on time and adequately. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workers across global supply chains.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the percentage of orders since the outbreak of COVID-19 that have been cancelled and not been reinstated and paid in full<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Order cancellation<br>- Partial cancellation<br>- Cancellation<br>- Order<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Must disclose a % of orders cancelled and not reinstated and paid in full</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Orders Cancelled and Not Paid in Full (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Orders_Cancelled_and_Not_Paid_in_Full_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Orders_Cancelled_and_Not_Paid_in_Full_COVID_19_Response+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449442,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Orders Discounted (COVID-19 Response)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Orders_Discounted_COVID_19_Response.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Orders Discounted (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the percentage of orders since the outbreak of COVID-19 for which discounts on the previously agreed payment terms have been renegotiated?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Brands purchasing practices during Covid-19 have had a huge impact on suppliers' ability to pay workers on time and adequately. Some brands cancelled orders then reinstated them, asking for discounts. Any changes on previously agreed upon prices has significant impacts on workers across supply chains as suppliers are already operating on thin margins. Therefore, it is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workers across global supply chains.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the percentage of orders since the outbreak of COVID-19 for which discounts on the previously agreed payment terms have been renegotiated.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Order cancellation<br>- Partial cancellation<br>- Cancellation<br>- Order<br>- Discount<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Must disclose a % of orders with agreed payment terms that were renegotiated during COVID 19</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Orders Discounted (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Orders_Discounted_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Orders_Discounted_COVID_19_Response+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449453,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Late Wage Payments (COVID-19 Response)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Late_Wage_Payments_COVID_19_Response.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Late Wage Payments (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the percentage of workers that received late wage payments due to the COVID-19 pandemic?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Brands purchasing practices during Covid-19 have had a huge impact on suppliers' ability to pay workers on time and adequately. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workers across global supply chains.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the percentage of workers that received late wage payments due to the COVID-19 pandemic.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Order cancellation<br>- Partial cancellation<br>- Cancellation<br>- Order<br>- Late wage<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Not enough to say workers were paid; need to know what % received late wage payments</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Late Wage Payments (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 295,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Late_Wage_Payments_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Late_Wage_Payments_COVID_19_Response+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449464,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Supply Chain Workers Laid-off (COVID-19 Response)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supply_Chain_Workers_Laid_off_COVID_19_Response.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Supply Chain Workers Laid-off (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the percentage or number of workers in the brand’s supply chain that have been laid off as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "As an outcome of the pandemic, many workers lost their jobs through facility closures, unlawful firings and union busting. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workers across global supply chains.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the percentage or number of workers in the brand’s supply chain that have been laid off as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Order cancellation<br>- Partial cancellation<br>- Cancellation<br>- Order<br><br><strong>Things keep in mind:</strong><br>- Must disclose % or number of workers laid off, i.e. stating that a brand is ensuring no job losses is not sufficient</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Supply Chain Workers Laid-off (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 295,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supply_Chain_Workers_Laid_off_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supply_Chain_Workers_Laid_off_COVID_19_Response+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449475,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Free on Board (FOB) Price Changes (COVID-19 Response)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Free_on_Board_FOB_Price_Changes_COVID_19_Response.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Free on Board (FOB) Price Changes (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose whether the brand’s Free On Board (FOB) prices have increased or decreased on average in the past 12 months?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "FOB are up-front costs assumed by suppliers, holding them liable for transportation of goods, in the case they are damaged or destroyed—this is in addition to the raw material costs suppliers pay in advance. Brands' purchasing practices influence suppliers' ability to keep the lights on in their facilities and pay workers on time, so any changes in prices could impact this.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses that Free On Board (FOB) prices have increased or decreased on average in the past 12 months.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Order cancellation<br>- Partial cancellation<br>- Cancellation<br>- Free on Board<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Must specifically reference FOB; not acceptable to state i.e. \"We have not changed our payment terms\"</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Free on Board (FOB) Price Changes (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 257,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Free_on_Board_FOB_Price_Changes_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Free_on_Board_FOB_Price_Changes_COVID_19_Response+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449486,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Percentage of Workers Receiving Wage Payments Digitally",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Percentage_of_Workers_Receiving_Wage_Payments_Digitally.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Percentage of Workers Receiving Wage Payments Digitally",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the % of workers that are receiving wage payments digitally?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Evidence suggests digital payments positively correlate with better working conditions. Digital payments enable financial inclusion, where women can manage their own bank accounts, offering women garment workers more autonomy over how money is spent, building confidence and independence.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the percentage of workers that are receiving wage payments digitally. Best practice would include a full breakdown on the percentage of workers paid digitally, by cash and cheque.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or <br>- California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Wage payment<br>- Digital payment<br>- Wages paid<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Must include a figure or % of -- i.e. saying \"all workers in our partner factories are paid digitally\" is not acceptable.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Percentage of Workers Receiving Wage Payments Digitally+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1232,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 291,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Percentage_of_Workers_Receiving_Wage_Payments_Digitally+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Percentage_of_Workers_Receiving_Wage_Payments_Digitally+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449497,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Standard Supplier Agreement Template",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Standard_Supplier_Agreement_Template.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Standard Supplier Agreement Template",
      "question": "Does the company publish a standard supplier agreement template, setting out typical order and payment terms and conditions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers. Disclosure of payment terms is important because it helps suppliers plan and as they front the costs of production (in most cases), having this information better enables prompt and fair payment terms as suppliers are able to plan and pay workers on time and adequately.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes a standard supplier agreement template, setting out typical order and payment terms and conditions.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company supplier code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Supplier template<br>- Supplier agreement<br>- Template<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Extended and long payment terms can impact a supplier’s ability to provide decent employment conditions</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Standard Supplier Agreement Template+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Standard_Supplier_Agreement_Template+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Standard_Supplier_Agreement_Template+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449508,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Policy on Up-Front Supplier Payments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Policy_on_Up_Front_Supplier_Payments.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Policy on Up-Front Supplier Payments",
      "question": "Does the company disclose policy on what % of the purchase order the brand typically pays to the supplier up front before production begins (in order to cover things such as the cost of raw materials)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers. Disclosure of payment terms is important because it helps suppliers plan and as they front the costs of production (in most cases) having this information better enables rompt and fair terms of payment helps suppliers with cash flow enabling them to pay workers on time and adequately.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses a policy on what % of the purchase order the brand typically pays to the supplier up front before production begins.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or <br>- California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- On-time<br>- Purchase Order<br>- Purchasing Practices<br>- Payment terms<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Extended and long payment terms can impact a supplier’s ability to provide decent employment conditions<br>- Long payment terms mean suppliers have to 'front' the costs of raw materials, often buying them on credit</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Policy on Up-Front Supplier Payments+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Policy_on_Up_Front_Supplier_Payments+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Policy_on_Up_Front_Supplier_Payments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449519,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Time Taken to Pay Purchase Orders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Time_Taken_to_Pay_Purchase_Orders.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Time Taken to Pay Purchase Orders",
      "question": "Does the company discloses the average number of days in which purchase orders are paid in full to suppliers after delivery?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers. Prompt and fair terms of payment helps suppliers with cash flow enabling them to pay workers on time and adequately.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the average number of days in which purchase orders are paid in full to suppliers after delivery/<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or <br>- California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- On-time<br>- Purchase Order<br>- Purchasing Practices<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Extended and long payment terms can impact a supplier’s ability to provide decent employment conditions<br>- Long payment terms mean suppliers have to 'front' the costs of raw materials, often buying them on credit</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Time Taken to Pay Purchase Orders+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Time_Taken_to_Pay_Purchase_Orders+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Time_Taken_to_Pay_Purchase_Orders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449530,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Number of Collective Bargaining Agreements Providing Wages Above Legal Minimum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Number_of_Collective_Bargaining_Agreements_Providing_Wages_Above_Legal_Minimum.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Number of Collective Bargaining Agreements Providing Wages Above Legal Minimum",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the number of collective bargaining agreements that provide wages that are higher than required by local law for workers in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Collective bargaining agreements allow employers and unions to negotiate on important issues such as fair wages and working conditions. Disclosing whether a company has collective bargaining agreements to pay higher wages than local law is important because local laws are insufficient to cover a living wage, which are a human right recognised by the United Nations, and it means being paid enough to afford food, water, housing, education, health care, transportation, clothing.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the number of collective bargaining agreements that provide wages that are higher than required by local law for workers in the supply chain.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Trade Union<br>- Collective bargaining<br>- Freedom of Association<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Must be in supply chain<br>- Global Framework Agreements are good examples</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Number of Collective Bargaining Agreements Providing Wages Above Legal Minimum+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Number_of_Collective_Bargaining_Agreements_Providing_Wages_Above_Legal_Minimum+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Number_of_Collective_Bargaining_Agreements_Providing_Wages_Above_Legal_Minimum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449541,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Prevalance of Collective Bargaining Violations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Prevalance_of_Collective_Bargaining_Violations.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Prevalance of Collective Bargaining Violations",
      "question": "Does the company publish data on the prevalence of collective bargaining and freedom of association related violations in supplier facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Collective bargaining agreements allow employers and unions to negotiate on important issues such as fair wages and working conditions. It is important to disclose the prevalence of violations on freedom of association and collective bargaining because if these violations are not monitored and disclosed, they are hard to remedy.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes data on the prevalence of collective bargaining and freedom of association related violations in supplier facilities.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Trade Union<br>- Collective bargaining<br>- Freedom of Association<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Must be in supply chain</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Prevalance of Collective Bargaining Violations+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Prevalance_of_Collective_Bargaining_Violations+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Prevalance_of_Collective_Bargaining_Violations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449552,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Racial Equality Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Racial_Equality_Actions.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Racial Equality Actions",
      "question": "Does the company publish actions focusing on the promotion of race equality in supplier facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "It is important that brands publish information on the promotion of racial equality because it evidences their commitment to address these issues internally.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses actions focusing on the promotion of race equality in supplier facilities.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Gender Pay Gap Report<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Race<br>- Racial<br>- Racism <br>- Ethnic<br>- Ethnicity<br>- Equality<br>- Empowerment<br>- Equal Opportunity</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Racial Equality Actions+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 795,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 302,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Racial_Equality_Actions+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Racial_Equality_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449563,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Ethnicity Pay Gap",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Ethnicity_Pay_Gap.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Ethnicity Pay Gap",
      "question": "Does the company publish an annual ethnicity pay gap, including by distribution of job roles, within the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Publishing annual ethnicity pay gap data is important because it is a tangible output that holds brands accountable to their commitment on racial equality.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes an annual race pay gap, including by distribution of job roles, within the company.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Gender Pay Gap Report<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Race<br>- Racial<br>- Racism <br>- Ethnic<br>- Ethnicity<br>- Equality<br>- Empowerment<br>- Equal Opportunity<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- disclosure must be about supplier facilities (supply chain worker data)</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Ethnicity Pay Gap+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 795,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 302,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Ethnicity_Pay_Gap+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Ethnicity_Pay_Gap+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449574,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Race-disaggregated Job Distribution",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Race_disaggregated_Job_Distribution.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Race-disaggregated Job Distribution",
      "question": "Does the company publish race/ethnicity breakdown by distribution of job roles (e.g. executive level, managers/supervisors, employees) within the company (head office, retail stories, owned and operated facilities)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Publishing the distribution of job roles within a company's own operations by race/ethnicity is important because it is a tangible output that holds brands accountable to their commitment on racial equality.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses actions focusing on the promotion of race equality<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Gender Pay Gap Report<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Race<br>- Racial<br>- Racism <br>- Ethnic<br>- Ethnicity<br>- Equality<br>- Empowerment<br>- Equal Opportunity</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Race-disaggregated Job Distribution+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 795,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 302,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Race_disaggregated_Job_Distribution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Race_disaggregated_Job_Distribution+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449585,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Sourced Fibre Breakdown",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Sourced_Fibre_Breakdown.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Sourced Fibre Breakdown",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the breakdown (% or tonnes) of types of fibres sourced annually (i.e. the fibre mix)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Disclosure what fibres are used in the products made by the brand, for example 80% cotton and 20% polyester. Publishing this information is important because it helps monitor what types of resources are being used and how much. Different raw materials have different environmental impacts - brands need account for the environmental impacts of each material they use.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the breakdown (% or tonnes) of types of fibres sourced annually (i.e. the fibre mix).<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Materials<br>- Sustainable <br>- Cotton<br>- Leather<br>- Polyester<br>- Viscose<br>- Wool<br><br><strong>To keep in mind:</strong><br>- The breakdown of fibres used should be dislcosed in tonnes or %</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Sourced Fibre Breakdown+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 331,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Sourced_Fibre_Breakdown+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Sourced_Fibre_Breakdown+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449596,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Approach to Defining Sustainable Materials",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Approach_to_Defining_Sustainable_Materials.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Approach to Defining Sustainable Materials",
      "question": "Does the company explain what tool or process they use to define what is considered a 'sustainable' material?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Sustainability is not a protected term in describing materials. This means brands can use the term 'sustainable' about their materials without following a specific standard. Therefore it is useful for brands to disclose what they mean when they say 'sustainable cotton' or 'sustainable viscose'",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company explains what tool or process they use to define what is considered a 'sustainable' material.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Materials<br>- Sustainable <br>- Definition<br>- Sustainability<br>- Fibre<br>- Sustainable Sourcing<br>- Sustainable Material<br>- Cotton<br>- Leather<br>- Polyester<br>- Viscose<br>- Wool</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Approach to Defining Sustainable Materials+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Approach_to_Defining_Sustainable_Materials+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Approach_to_Defining_Sustainable_Materials+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449607,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Targets to Reduce Textiles Derived from Virgin Fossil Fuels",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Targets_to_Reduce_Textiles_Derived_from_Virgin_Fossil_Fuels.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Targets to Reduce Textiles Derived from Virgin Fossil Fuels",
      "question": "Does the company publish measurable, time-bound targets for the reduction of textiles deriving from virgin fossil fuels?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Some textiles are made from virgin fossil fuels. This indicator looks for disclosure of a measurable, time-bound targets for the reduction of textiles deriving from virgin fossil fuels. Disclosure on this is important because it informs our understanding on the link between textiles and fossil fuels and how brands are mitigating these impacts.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes measurable, time-bound targets for the reduction of textiles deriving from virgin fossil fuels.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Polyester<br>- Plastic<br>- Synthetic<br>- Materials<br>- Recycled<br>- Virgin Fossil Fuels</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Targets to Reduce Textiles Derived from Virgin Fossil Fuels+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Targets_to_Reduce_Textiles_Derived_from_Virgin_Fossil_Fuels+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Targets_to_Reduce_Textiles_Derived_from_Virgin_Fossil_Fuels+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449618,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress to Reducing Textiles Derived from Virgin Fossil Fuels",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_to_Reducing_Textiles_Derived_from_Virgin_Fossil_Fuels.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress to Reducing Textiles Derived from Virgin Fossil Fuels",
      "question": "Does the company publish annual progress on the reduction of textiles deriving from virgin fossil fuels?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Some textiles are made from virgin fossil fuels. This indicator looks for disclosure about progress on the reduction of textiles deriving from virgin fossil fuels. Disclosure on this is important because it informs our understanding on the link between textiles and fossil fuels and how brands are tangibly mitigating these impacts.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes annual progress on the reduction of textiles deriving from virgin fossil fuels.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Polyester<br>- Plastic<br>- Synthetic<br>- Materials<br>- Recycled<br>- Virgin Fossil Fuels</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress to Reducing Textiles Derived from Virgin Fossil Fuels+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_to_Reducing_Textiles_Derived_from_Virgin_Fossil_Fuels+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_to_Reducing_Textiles_Derived_from_Virgin_Fossil_Fuels+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449629,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Pre-Production Waste Generated",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Pre_Production_Waste_Generated.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Quantity of Pre-Production Waste Generated",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the quantity of pre-production waste generated annually (e.g. offcuts, scraps, threads, end of roll fabrics)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Around one quarter of the industry’s resources are wasted as leftovers of textile and garment production every year. This is why it is useful for understanding what a company is doing to reduce pre-consumer waste.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses the quantity of pre-production waste generated annually (e.g. offcuts, scraps, threads, end of roll fabrics). <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Textile<br>- Product<br>- Waste <br>- Pre-consumer<br>- Off-cuts<br>- Unsold and defective stock<br>- Samples<br>- Circularity<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Pre-consumer waste/surplus includes off-cuts, unsold and defective stock, production samples.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Pre-Production Waste Generated+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Pre_Production_Waste_Generated+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Pre_Production_Waste_Generated+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449640,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Post-production Waste Generated",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Post_production_Waste_Generated.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Quantity of Post-production Waste Generated",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the quantity of post-production/pre-consumer waste generated annually (e.g. deadstock, overstock, samples)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Around one quarter of the industry’s resources are wasted as leftovers of textile and garment production every year. This is why it is useful for understanding what a company is doing to reduce pre-consumer waste.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses the quantity of post-production/pre-consumer waste generated annually (e.g. deadstock, overstock, samples). <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Textile<br>- Product<br>- Waste <br>- Pre-consumer<br>- Off-cuts<br>- Unsold and defective stock<br>- Samples<br>- Circularity<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Pre-consumer waste/surplus includes off-cuts, unsold and defective stock, production samples.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Post-production Waste Generated+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Post_production_Waste_Generated+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Post_production_Waste_Generated+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449651,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Breakdown of Reuse/Recyling of Pre-consumer Waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Breakdown_of_Reuse_Recyling_of_Pre_consumer_Waste.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Breakdown of Reuse/Recyling of Pre-consumer Waste",
      "question": "Does the company disclose breakdown (% or tonnes) of how pre-consumer waste is reused or recycled (e.g. downcycled, resold locally, used for energy recovery, resold into other markets, upcycled, recycled into new textiles)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Around one quarter of the industry’s resources are wasted as leftovers of textile and garment production every year. This is why it is useful for understanding whether a company is reusing or recycling pre-consumer waste through different methods such as energy recovery, recycling into new fabric or selling this waste on other markets.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses breakdown (% or tonnes) of how pre-consumer waste is reused or recycled (e.g. downcycled, resold locally, used for energy recovery, resold into other markets, upcycled, recycled into new textiles). <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Textile<br>- Product<br>- Waste <br>- Pre-consumer<br>- Off-cuts<br>- Unsold and defective stock<br>- Samples<br>- Circularity<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Pre-consumer waste/surplus includes off-cuts, unsold and defective stock, production samples.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Breakdown of Reuse/Recyling of Pre-consumer Waste+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Breakdown_of_Reuse_Recyling_of_Pre_consumer_Waste+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Breakdown_of_Reuse_Recyling_of_Pre_consumer_Waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449662,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Take-back Scheme Outcomes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Take_back_Scheme_Outcomes.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Take-back Scheme Outcomes",
      "question": "Does the company disclose what happens to clothes received through take-back scheme (e.g. how much is resold locally, resold into other markets, downcycled, upcycled, recycled into new textiles)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Take-back clothing and textile recycling schemes encourage consumers to recycle their old garments rather throwing them into landfill. These schemes can help prolong the life of garments, enable clothing to be resold or reused and help facilitate textile-to-textile recycling.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses what happens to clothes received through take-back scheme (e.g. how much is resold locally, resold into other markets, downcycled, upcycled, recycled into new textiles).<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong> <br>- Take-back<br>- Recycling<br>- In-store<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- One-off or irregular projects not sufficient for the point<br>- This can sometimes be in a FAQ for customers</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Take-back Scheme Outcomes+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Take_back_Scheme_Outcomes+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Take_back_Scheme_Outcomes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449673,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Offers Clothing Longevity Business Models",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Offers_Clothing_Longevity_Business_Models.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Offers Clothing Longevity Business Models",
      "question": "Does the company offer new business models that support clothing longevity and slow down consumption of new clothing such as renting and reselling?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Clothing repair services help customers to extend the life of their garments and enables materials to stay in circulation for longer, which reduces the overall environmental impact of a garment throughout its lifecycle.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company offer new business models that support clothing longevity and slow down consumption of new clothing such as renting and reselling.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong> <br>- Repair<br>- Services<br>- Circular Economy<br>- Mending<br>- Renting<br>- Reselling<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong> <br>- This is often with information about the brands efforts towards a circular economy or in the FAQ section of their website for consumers</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Offers Clothing Longevity Business Models+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Offers_Clothing_Longevity_Business_Models+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Offers_Clothing_Longevity_Business_Models+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449684,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Supplier Wastewater Test Results",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Supplier_Wastewater_Test_Results.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Supplier Wastewater Test Results",
      "question": "Does the company publish supplier wastewater test results, such as in alignment with Detox campaign commitments?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Disclosing wastewater test results publicly helps inform understanding around potential human health and environmental impacts and design appropriate remediation and capacity building.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes supplier wastewater test results, such as in alignment with Detox campaign commitments. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Water<br>- Footprint<br>- Wastewater<br>- Water test</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6: Clean Water and Sanitation",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6.3 Improve water quality by reducing pollution, halving untreated wastewater, and increasing recycling and safe reuse.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.2 Achieve sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.6 Encourage companies to adopt sustainable practices and include sustainability information in their reporting."
      ],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Supplier Wastewater Test Results+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Supplier_Wastewater_Test_Results+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Supplier_Wastewater_Test_Results+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449695,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Water-Related Risk Assessment Process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Water_Related_Risk_Assessment_Process.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Water-Related Risk Assessment Process",
      "question": "Does the company disclose their process or methodology for conducting water-related risk assessments?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Disclosing whether a company is conducting water-related risk assessments helps inform understanding around the environmental risks of a company's water footprint, as many companies source from/ operate in water-stressed countries and regions.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes water-related risk assessments.<br><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Water<br>- Footprint<br>- Risk assessment</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6: Clean Water and Sanitation",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6.3 Improve water quality by reducing pollution, halving untreated wastewater, and increasing recycling and safe reuse.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12.6 Encourage companies to adopt sustainable practices and include sustainability information in their reporting."
      ],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Water-Related Risk Assessment Process+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Water_Related_Risk_Assessment_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Water_Related_Risk_Assessment_Process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449706,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Decarbonisation Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Decarbonisation Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company publish a time-bound, measurable commitment to decarbonisation (e.g. commitment to a complete coal phase out and/or renewable energy targets for own operations and supply chain)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Decarbonisation is key to addressing a company's environmental impacts. Disclosing a commitment to decarbonisation across the supply chain means a company is commited to reducing its carbon footprint in its own operations and across its supply chain.",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>2025 Methodology update<br></strong></p>\r\n<p>We are looking for targets that cover Scopes 1, 2 and 3, i.e. supply chain and own operations. These figures must be verified by the Science Based Targets Initiative. You must include a link to the SBTI website from the brand website. </p>\r\n<p>Please note that while we accept both absolute and intensity-based emissions reduction targets, best practice is an absolute target. We will specifically track which brands have absolute targets versus those with intensity-based targets.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Previous methodology</strong><br><br>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes measurable commitments on decarbonisation. <br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Carbon footprint<br>- Decarbonisation<br>- GHG footprint<br>- GHG emissions<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Will not allow decarbonisation that does not account for emissions within the supply chain.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Decarbonisation Commitment+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1273,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 332,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Commitment+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449717,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Decarbonisation Progress",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Progress.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Decarbonisation Progress",
      "question": "Does the company publish measurable progress towards decarbonisation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Decarbonisation is key to addressing a company's environmental impacts. Disclosing a progress on decarbonisation across the supply chain means a company shows how it is taking action to reduce its carbon footprint in its own operations and across its supply chain.",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>2025 Methodology update</strong></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Targets must be SBTI verified. No points will be awarded unless a clear target is defined in 2.1.1 or 2.1.2.</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Progress is explicitly defined as emissions reduction against the base year of the disclosed target (not year-on-year). For points to be awarded, the base year emission data should be included in the report. </span></span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>Previous methodology</strong><br><br>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes measurable towards decarbonisations.</p>\r\n<p><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Carbon footprint<br>- Decarbonisation<br>- GHG footprint<br>- GHG emissions</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Decarbonisation Progress+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1273,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 332,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Progress+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Progress+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449728,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Zero Deforestation Progress",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Zero_Deforestation_Progress.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Zero Deforestation Progress",
      "question": "Does the company publish measurable progress towards achieving zero deforestation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Limiting deforestation is a crucial part of mitigating global carbon emissions. A zero-deforestation commitment shows that the company is working to minimise its use of fibres derived from ancient and endangered forests and forested areas that have been cleared or converted.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes measurable progress towards achieving zero deforestation. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Deforestation<br>- Forest<br>- Viscose<br>- Man-made cellulosic fibres<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Will not allow net zero deforestation which allows for the clearance or conversion of forests in one area as long as an equal area is replanted elsewhere. Looking for best practice on this issue which is zero deforestation.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Zero Deforestation Progress+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Zero_Deforestation_Progress+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Zero_Deforestation_Progress+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449739,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Implementation of Regenerative Farming Practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Implementation_of_Regenerative_Farming_Practices.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Implementation of Regenerative Farming Practices",
      "question": "Does the company disclose evidence of implementing regenerative farming practices in one or more raw material sources?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The fashion inudstry heavily relies on agriculture to produce its raw materials and yet, the environmental impacts of current agricutlural practices are often forgotten. Regenerative Agriculture is a system of farming principles and practices that increases biodiversity, enriches soils, improves watersheds, and enhances ecosystem services, including carbon sequestration.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company implements regenerative farming practices for one or more raw materials.<br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Regenerative agriculture<br>- Eco-farming<br>- Carbon positive farming<br>- Agroforestry</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Implementation of Regenerative Farming Practices+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Implementation_of_Regenerative_Farming_Practices+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Implementation_of_Regenerative_Farming_Practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7449750,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Absolute Energy Reduction",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Absolute_Energy_Reduction.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Absolute Energy Reduction",
      "question": "Does the company disclose data on absolute energy reduction in the supply chain (e.g. at manufacturing and processing facilities, fibre production level)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This indicator focuses on absolute data rather than intensity. Absolute refers to the total amount of energy reduced in the supply chain. Whereas intensity is a metric that normalises a company's emissions or energy consumption relative to the businesses revenue, which allows emissions or energy use to increase as revenue increases.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes measurable progress towards achieving zero deforestation. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Absolute energy reduction<br>- Energy reduction<br>- Energy use<br>- Carbon footprint<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- We look at absolute energy reduction, not energy intensity reduction</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Absolute Energy Reduction+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Absolute_Energy_Reduction+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Absolute_Energy_Reduction+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7452786,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Open Format for Supply Chain Disclosure (Combined)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Open_Format_for_Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Combined.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Open Format for Supply Chain Disclosure (Combined)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Clean Clothes Campaign+Open Format for Supply Chain Disclosure (Combined)+Clean Clothes Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1 === \"Yes\" || m3 === \"Yes\" || [m2].flat().includes(\"List is publicly available as a csv or Excel spreadsheet\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "metric": "~5768863",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "metric": "~5821888",
          "name": "m2"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "metric": "~19689687",
          "name": "m3"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1807,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 431,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Open_Format_for_Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Combined+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Open_Format_for_Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Combined+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7469659,
      "name": "Commons+Shareholder Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Shareholder_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Shareholder Disclosure",
      "question": "Is there a public record of the company’s largest (institutional) shareholders?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"color: #34495e;\">A shareholder (also known as stockholder) is an <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individual\" title=\"Individual\" style=\"color: #34495e;\">individual</a> or institution (including a <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation\" title=\"Corporation\" style=\"color: #34495e;\">corporation</a>) that legally owns one or more <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Share_(finance)\" title=\"Share (finance)\" style=\"color: #34495e;\">shares</a> of the <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Share_capital\" title=\"Share capital\" style=\"color: #34495e;\">share capital</a> of a <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_company\" title=\"Public company\" style=\"color: #34495e;\">public</a> or <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_corporation\" title=\"Private corporation\" style=\"color: #34495e;\">private corporation</a>. Shareholders may be referred to as members of a <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation\" title=\"Corporation\" style=\"color: #34495e;\">corporation</a>. A person or legal entity becomes a shareholder in a corporation when their name and other details are entered in the corporation's register of shareholders or members.<a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shareholder#cite_note-1\" style=\"color: #34495e;\">[1]</a> </span></p>\r\n<p>The influence of a shareholder on the business is determined by the shareholding percentage owned.</p>\r\n<p>Source: [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shareholder|Wikipedia]].</p>",
      "methodology": "<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Scour the company’s website - companies often give information about their major shareholders on the investment sections of their websites.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>Scour the company’s latest Annual Report- companies often report about their major shareholders on  their Reports under section such as \"Shareholder Information\".</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<hr>\r\n<p>Example: https://corporate.zalando.com/en/investor-relations/shareholder-structure</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes, disclosed by the company",
        "Yes, disclosed by an external party",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 47,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Shareholder_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7482651,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Waste Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Waste Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following waste indicators did the company disclose?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric assesses how much a company discloses about their waste management. </p>\r\n<p>Below is a list of the metrics that are included in this assessment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Apparel Research Group+Waste Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var m8, m9, researched;\n\n  if (m8 === \"No\") {\n    m8 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  if (m9 === \"No\") {\n    m9 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  researched = [m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, m8, m9].filter(function(val) {\n    return val !== \"NR\";\n  });\n\n  numKnown(researched) / researched.length * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~848767",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~885125",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~836246",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~836274",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~836262",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~837199",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~848876",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m8",
          "metric": "~7910362",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m9",
          "metric": "~7910247",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "+1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1757,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 974,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7605766,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.1 Own Operations Policies+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_1_Own_Operations_Policies+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.1 Own Operations Policies",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "These policies evidence the company's operating guidelines and outline the standards that must be implemented across the company's activities. Policies are a way for a company to communicate its commitments to human rights, social impacts and environmental protection. If they have policies in place we know they are considering these topics within their business.<br>\n<br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Animal Welfare\":\"0.5\",\"Annual Leave & Public Holidays\":\"0.5\",\"Anti-bribery Corruption & Presentation of False Information\":\"0.5\",\"Biodiversity & Conservation\":\"0.5\",\"Community Engagement\":\"0.5\",\"Contracts & Terms of Employment\":\"0\",\"Discrimination\":\"0.5\",\"Diversity & Inclusion\":\"0.5\",\"Energy & Carbon Emissions\":\"0.5\",\"Equal Pay\":\"0.5\",\"Freedom of Association Right to Organise & Collective Bargaining\":\"0.5\",\"Harassment & Violence\":\"0.5\",\"Health & Safety\":\"0.5\",\"Maternity Rights & Parental Leave\":\"0.5\",\"Mental Health & Wellbeing (2021 only)\":\"0.5\",\"Notice Period Dismissal & Disciplinary Action\":\"0\",\"Restricted Substance List\":\"0.5\",\"Wages & Financial Benefits (e.g. bonuses/insurance/social security/pensions)\":\"0.5\",\"Waste & Recycling (Packaging/Office/Retail)\":\"0.5\",\"Waste & Recycling (Product/Textiles)\":\"0.5\",\"Water Usage & Footprint\":\"0.5\",\"Working Hours & Rest Breaks\":\"0.50\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Policy_Commitments_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_1_Own_Operations_Policies+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7605775,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Supply Chain Policies+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Supply Chain Policies",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Policies outline the minimum human rights and environmental standards that companies require their vendors and partners to implement throughout the supply chain. Having supplier policies in place shows that the company takes some responsibility for the practises that happen within its supply chain.<br>\n<br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Annual Leave & Public Holidays\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Anti-bribery Corruption & Presentation of False Information\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Biodiversity & Conservation\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Child Labour\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Community Engagement\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Contracts & Terms of Employment\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Discrimination\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Energy & Carbon Emissions\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Equal Pay\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Forced & Bonded Labour\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Foreign & Migrant Labour\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Freedom of Association Right to Organise & Collective Bargaining\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Harassment & Violence\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Health & Safety\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Homeworking (2021 only)\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Living Conditions/Dormitories\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Maternity Rights & Parental Leave\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Manufacturing Restricted Substances List (MRSL) (2021 only)\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Notice Period Dismissal & Disciplinary Action\":\"\",\"Overtime Pay\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Sub-contracting Outsourcing & Homeworkers\":\"\",\"Sub-contracting (2021 only)\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Wages & Financial Benefits (e.g. bonuses/insurance/social security/pensions)\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Waste & Recycling (Packaging/Office/Facility)\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Waste & Recycling (Product/Textiles)\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Water Effluents & Treatment\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Water Usage & Footprint\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Working Hours & Rest Breaks\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Supply_Chain_Policies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supply_Chain_Policies+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7605811,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.3 Management Procedures+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Management_Procedures+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.3 Management Procedures",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>These management procedures identify how the company is putting its policies into action. It is important for a company to have procedures that apply to their suppliers and own employees. This shows that they are working to uphold their commitments to human rights, social impacts and environmental protection and that the company takes some steps to improve practises across the company and/or the supply chain. <br><br><br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Animal Welfare\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Annual Leave & Public Holidays\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Anti-bribery Corruption & Presentation of False Information\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Biodiversity & Conservation\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Child Labour\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Community Engagement\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Contracts & Terms of Employment\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Discrimination\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Diversity & Inclusion\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Energy & Carbon Emissions\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Equal Pay\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Forced & Bonded Labour\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Foreign & Migrant Labour\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Freedom of Association Right to Organise & Collective Bargaining\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Harassment & Violence\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Health & Safety\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Homeworking (2021 only)\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Living Conditions/Dormitories\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Maternity Rights & Parental Leave\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Manufacturing Restricted Substances List (MRSL) (2021 only)\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Mental Health & Wellbeing (2021 only)\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Notice Period Dismissal & Disciplinary Action\":\"0\",\"Overtime Pay\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Restricted Substance List\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Sub-contracting Outsourcing & Homeworkers\":\"0\",\"Sub-contracting (2021 only)\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Wages & Financial Benefits (e.g. bonuses/insurance/social security/pensions)\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Waste & Recycling (Packaging/Office/Facility/Retail)\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Waste & Recycling (Product/Textiles)\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Water Effluents & Treatment\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Water Usage & Footprint\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"Working Hours & Rest Breaks\":\"0.333333333333333\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Policy_Commitments_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Management_Procedures+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7605856,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2.1 Identifies Lead Responsibility for Human Rights & Environmental Issues+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Identifies_Lead_Responsibility_for_Human_Rights_Environmental_Issues+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2.1 Identifies Lead Responsibility for Human Rights & Environmental Issues",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "When brands publish contact details for their sustainability team this demonstrates that they are open to dialogue between the brand and its customers and stakeholders. <br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Discloses direct contact details for relevant department\":\"10\",\"Discloses name and direct contact details of the relevant person\":\"\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Governance_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Governance_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Identifies_Lead_Responsibility_for_Human_Rights_Environmental_Issues+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7605883,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Worker Representation on Board+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Worker_Representation_on_Board+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Worker Representation on Board",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Worker representation on the corporate board of directors is important because it ensures worker voice is incorporated at the decision making level.<br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Board_Accountability_for_Human_Rights_Environmental_Issues.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Worker_Representation_on_Board+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7605919,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3.1 Tier One Factory Disclosure+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_1_Tier_One_Factory_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3.1 Tier One Factory Disclosure",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Disclosing first tier supplier lists is a crucial step towards transparency for major fashion brands. It can help facilitate the identification and escalation of labour rights and environmental issues by trade unions, NGOs and other stakeholders directly to brands enabling them to take urgent actions to address and remediate issues raised.<br><br><br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Name of Facility\":\"1.153846153846155\",\"Address\":\"1.153846153846155\",\"Type of products or services\":\"0.769230769230769\",\"Approximate number of workers at each site\":\"0.769230769230769\",\"Sex-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"If facility has trade union\":\"0.769230769230769\",\"If the facility has an independent worker committee\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"% or number of migrant or contract workers\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Certifications the facility has (if any) (2021 only)\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Name of Parent Company (for each facility if applicable)\":\"1.153846153846155\",\"List is publicly available as a csv or Excel spreadsheet\":\"1.153846153846155\",\"Discloses what percentage of its tier one factories is published\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Discloses 95% or higher of tier one factories are included in the list/map\":\"0.769230769230769\",\"Publishes that this list or map of tier one factories has been updated within the past 6 months\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Race-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site (FTI Brazil only)\":\"\",\"Nothing\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 278,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 278,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_1_Tier_One_Factory_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7605928,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3.2 Processing Facilities Disclosure+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_2_Processing_Facilities_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3.2 Processing Facilities Disclosure",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Disclosing a list of suppliers beyond the first tier shows that a brand is working to map deeper levels of their supply chain and takes some responsibility for its direct and indirect sourcing relationships. It can help facilitate the identification and escalation of labour rights and environmental issues by trade unions, NGOs and other stakeholders directly to brands enabling them to take urgent actions to address and remediate issues raised. This is especially important beyond the first tier where brands may not be able to monitor their suppliers as easily. <br><br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Name of Facility\":\"1.153846153846155\",\"Address\":\"1.153846153846155\",\"Type of products or services\":\"0.769230769230769\",\"Approximate number of workers at each site\":\"0.769230769230769\",\"Sex-disaggregated breakdown of workers\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"If facility has trade union\":\"0.769230769230769\",\"If the facility has an independent worker committee\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"% or number of migrant or contract workers\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Certifications the facility has (if any) (2021 only)\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Name of Parent Company (for each facility if applicable)\":\"1.153846153846155\",\"Discloses which tier one facility (or facilities) this processing facility works with\":\"\",\"List is publicly available as a csv or Excel spreadsheet\":\"1.153846153846155\",\"Discloses what percentage of processing facilities is published\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Discloses 95% or higher of processing facilities are included in the list/map\":\"0.769230769230769\",\"Publishes that this list or map of processing facilities has been updated within the past 6 months\":\"0.384615384615385\",\"Race-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site (FTI Brazil only)\":\"\",\"Nothing\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 278,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 278,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_2_Processing_Facilities_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7605937,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3.3 Raw Materials Suppliers Disclosure+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_3_Raw_Materials_Suppliers_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3.3 Raw Materials Suppliers Disclosure",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Disclosing raw material suppliers shows that a brand is working to trace its whole supply chain and takes some responsibility for its direct and indirect sourcing relationships. It can help facilitate the identification and escalation of labour rights and environmental issues by trade unions, NGOs and other stakeholders directly to brands enabling them to take urgent actions to address and remediate issues raised. This is especially important beyond the first tier where brands may not be able to monitor their suppliers as easily. <br><br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Name of supplier (e.g. parent company) (2021 only)\":\"1.428571429\",\"Name of Supplier (e.g. facility or farm)\":\"1.428571429\",\"Address\":\"1.428571429\",\"Type of raw material products or services\":\"0.9523809524\",\"Approximate number of workers\":\"0.9523809524\",\"Sex-disaggregated breakdown of workers\":\"0.4761904762\",\"% or number of migrant or contract workers\":\"0.4761904762\",\"List is publicly available as a csv or Excel spreadsheet\":\"0.9523809524\",\"Discloses what percentage of raw materials suppliers is published\":\"0.4761904762\",\"Discloses supplier list that covers more than one raw material type (2021 only)\":\"0.4761904762\",\"Discloses 95% or higher of raw materials suppliers are included in the list/map\":\"\",\"Publishes that this list or map of raw materials suppliers has been updated within the past 12 months\":\"0.4761904762\",\"Discloses whether the company is tracing the source/supplier of one or more specific raw materials\":\"0.4761904762\",\"Race-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site (FTI Brazil only)\":\"\",\"Nothing\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 778,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 285,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_3_Raw_Materials_Suppliers_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606027,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Percentage of Audited Facilities Beyond Tier 1+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Audited_Facilities_Beyond_Tier_1+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Percentage of Audited Facilities Beyond Tier 1",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.  <br>\n<br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 322,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 322,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Audited_Facilities_Beyond_Tier_1+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606045,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Percentage of Audits including Trade Union Representative+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Audits_including_Trade_Union_Representative+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Percentage of Audits including Trade Union Representative",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised. Having a trade union representative present during the audit process helps ensure that workers' voice is considered during the due diligence process and effective remedy is actioned.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Audits_including_Trade_Union_Representative+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606090,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Orders Partially or Completely Cancelled (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Orders_Partially_or_Completely_Cancelled_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Orders Partially or Completely Cancelled (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Brands purchasing practices during Covid-19 have had a huge impact on suppliers' ability to pay workers on time and adequately. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workers across global supply chains. Disclosing partial or complete order cancellations highlights brands' responses to COVID 19 and their direct impact on suppliers. <br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Orders_Partially_or_Completely_Cancelled_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606099,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Orders Cancelled and Not Paid in Full (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Orders_Cancelled_and_Not_Paid_in_Full_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Orders Cancelled and Not Paid in Full (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Brands purchasing practices during Covid-19 have had a huge impact on suppliers' ability to pay workers on time and adequately. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workers across global supply chains. <br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Orders_Cancelled_and_Not_Paid_in_Full_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606108,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Orders Discounted (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Orders_Discounted_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Orders Discounted (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Brands purchasing practices during Covid-19 have had a huge impact on suppliers' ability to pay workers on time and adequately. Some brands cancelled orders then reinstated them, asking for discounts. Any changes on previously agreed upon prices has significant impacts on workers across supply chains as suppliers are already operating on thin margins. Therefore, it is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workers across global supply chains. <br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Orders_Discounted_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606117,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Supply Chain Workers Laid-off (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supply_Chain_Workers_Laid_off_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Supply Chain Workers Laid-off (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "As an outcome of the pandemic, many workers lost their jobs through facility closures, unlawful firings and union busting. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workers across global supply chains. <br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 295,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supply_Chain_Workers_Laid_off_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606126,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Free on Board (FOB) Price Changes (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Free_on_Board_FOB_Price_Changes_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Free on Board (FOB) Price Changes (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "FOB are up-front costs assumed by suppliers, holding them liable for transportation of goods, in the case they are damaged or destroyed—this is in addition to the raw material costs suppliers pay in advance.  Brands' purchasing practices influence suppliers' ability to keep the lights on in their facilities and pay workers on time, so any changes in prices could impact this.<br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 257,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Free_on_Board_FOB_Price_Changes_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606171,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Percentage of Workers Receiving Wage Payments Digitally+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Percentage_of_Workers_Receiving_Wage_Payments_Digitally+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Percentage of Workers Receiving Wage Payments Digitally",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Evidence suggests digital payments positively correlate with better working conditions. Digital payments enable financial inclusion, where women can manage their own bank accounts, offering women garment workers more autonomy over how money is spent, building confidence and independence. <br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 782,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 289,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Percentage_of_Workers_Receiving_Wage_Payments_Digitally+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606225,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Standard Supplier Agreement Template+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Standard_Supplier_Agreement_Template+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Standard Supplier Agreement Template",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers. Disclosure of payment terms is important because it helps suppliers plan and as they front the costs of production (in most cases), having this information better enables prompt and fair payment terms as suppliers are able to plan and pay workers on time and adequately.<br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Standard_Supplier_Agreement_Template+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606234,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Policy on Up-Front Supplier Payments+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Policy_on_Up_Front_Supplier_Payments+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Policy on Up-Front Supplier Payments",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers. Disclosure of payment terms is important because it helps suppliers plan and as they front the costs of production (in most cases) having this information better enables  rompt and fair terms of payment helps suppliers with cash flow enabling them to pay workers on time and adequately. <br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Policy_on_Up_Front_Supplier_Payments+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606243,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Time Taken to Pay Purchase Orders+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Time_Taken_to_Pay_Purchase_Orders+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Time Taken to Pay Purchase Orders",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers. Prompt and fair terms of payment helps suppliers with cash flow enabling them to pay workers on time and adequately. <br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Time_Taken_to_Pay_Purchase_Orders+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606288,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Number of Collective Bargaining Agreements Providing Wages Above Legal Minimum+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Number_of_Collective_Bargaining_Agreements_Providing_Wages_Above_Legal_Minimum+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Number of Collective Bargaining Agreements Providing Wages Above Legal Minimum",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Collective bargaining agreements allow employers and unions to negotiate on important issues such as fair wages and working conditions. Disclosing whether a company has collective bargaining agreements to pay higher wages than local law is important because local laws are insufficient to cover a living wage, which are a human right recognised by the United Nations, and it means being paid enough to afford food, water, housing, education, health care, transportation, clothing. <br>\n<br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Unionisation_and_Collective_Bargaining_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Number_of_Collective_Bargaining_Agreements_Providing_Wages_Above_Legal_Minimum+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606297,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Prevalance of Collective Bargaining Violations+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Prevalance_of_Collective_Bargaining_Violations+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Prevalance of Collective Bargaining Violations",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Collective bargaining agreements allow employers and unions to negotiate on important issues such as fair wages and working conditions. It is important to disclose the prevalence of violations on freedom of association and collective bargaining because if these violations are not monitored and disclosed, they are hard to remedy. <br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Unionisation_and_Collective_Bargaining_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Prevalance_of_Collective_Bargaining_Violations+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606333,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Racial Equality Actions+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Racial_Equality_Actions+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Racial Equality Actions",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>It is important that brands publish information on the promotion of racial equality because it evidences their commitment to address these issues internally. <br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 795,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 302,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Racial_Equality_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Racial_Equality_Score_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Racial_Equality_Actions+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606342,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Ethnicity Pay Gap+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Ethnicity_Pay_Gap+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Ethnicity Pay Gap",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 795,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 302,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Racial_Equality_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Racial_Equality_Score_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Ethnicity_Pay_Gap+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606351,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Race-disaggregated Job Distribution+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Race_disaggregated_Job_Distribution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Race-disaggregated Job Distribution",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Publishing the distribution of job roles within a company's own operations by race/ethnicity is important because it is a tangible output that holds brands accountable to their commitment on racial equality. <br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 795,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 302,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Racial_Equality_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Racial_Equality_Score_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Race_disaggregated_Job_Distribution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606360,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Sourced Fibre Breakdown+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Sourced_Fibre_Breakdown+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Sourced Fibre Breakdown",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Disclosure what fibres are used in the products made by the brand, for example 80% cotton and 20% polyester. Publishing this information is important because it helps monitor what types of resources are being used and how much. Different raw materials have different environmental impacts - brands need account for the environmental impacts of each material they use. <br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Sustainable_Sourcing_Materials.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Overconsumption_Materials.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Sourced_Fibre_Breakdown+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606387,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Approach to Defining Sustainable Materials+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Approach_to_Defining_Sustainable_Materials+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Approach to Defining Sustainable Materials",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Sustainability is not a protected term in describing materials. This means brands can use the term 'sustainable' about their materials without following a specific standard. Therefore it is useful for brands to disclose what they mean when they say 'sustainable cotton' or 'sustainable viscose'<br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Sustainable_Sourcing_Materials.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Approach_to_Defining_Sustainable_Materials+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606396,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Targets to Reduce Textiles Derived from Virgin Fossil Fuels+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Targets_to_Reduce_Textiles_Derived_from_Virgin_Fossil_Fuels+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Targets to Reduce Textiles Derived from Virgin Fossil Fuels",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Some textiles are made from virgin fossil fuels. This indicator looks for disclosure of a measurable, time-bound targets for the reduction of textiles deriving from virgin fossil fuels. Disclosure on this is important because it informs our understanding on the link between textiles and fossil fuels and how brands are mitigating these impacts. <br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Sustainable_Sourcing_Materials.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Targets_to_Reduce_Textiles_Derived_from_Virgin_Fossil_Fuels+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606405,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress to Reducing Textiles Derived from Virgin Fossil Fuels+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_to_Reducing_Textiles_Derived_from_Virgin_Fossil_Fuels+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress to Reducing Textiles Derived from Virgin Fossil Fuels",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Some textiles are made from virgin fossil fuels. This indicator looks for disclosure about progress on the reduction of textiles deriving from virgin fossil fuels. Disclosure on this is important because it informs our understanding on the link between textiles and fossil fuels and how brands are tangibly mitigating these impacts. <br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Sustainable_Sourcing_Materials.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_to_Reducing_Textiles_Derived_from_Virgin_Fossil_Fuels+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606432,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Pre-Production Waste Generated+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Pre_Production_Waste_Generated+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Quantity of Pre-Production Waste Generated",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Around one quarter of the industry’s resources are wasted as leftovers of textile and garment production every year. This is why it is useful for understanding what a company is doing to reduce pre-consumer waste.<br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Pre_Production_Waste_Generated+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606441,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Post-production Waste Generated+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Post_production_Waste_Generated+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Quantity of Post-production Waste Generated",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Around one quarter of the industry’s resources are wasted as leftovers of textile and garment production every year. This is why it is useful for understanding what a company is doing to reduce pre-consumer waste.<br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Post_production_Waste_Generated+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606450,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Breakdown of Reuse/Recyling of Pre-consumer Waste+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Breakdown_of_Reuse_Recyling_of_Pre_consumer_Waste+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Breakdown of Reuse/Recyling of Pre-consumer Waste",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Around one quarter of the industry’s resources are wasted as leftovers of textile and garment production every year. This is why it is useful for understanding whether a company is reusing or recycling pre-consumer waste through different methods such as energy recovery, recycling into new fabric or selling this waste on other markets. <br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Breakdown_of_Reuse_Recyling_of_Pre_consumer_Waste+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606477,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Take-back Scheme Outcomes+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Take_back_Scheme_Outcomes+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Take-back Scheme Outcomes",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Take-back clothing and textile recycling schemes encourage consumers to recycle their old garments rather throwing them into landfill. These schemes can help prolong the life of garments, enable clothing to be resold or reused and help facilitate textile-to-textile recycling.<br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Take_back_Scheme_Outcomes+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606486,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Offers Clothing Longevity Business Models+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Offers_Clothing_Longevity_Business_Models+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Offers Clothing Longevity Business Models",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Clothing repair services help customers to extend the life of their garments and enables materials to stay in circulation for longer, which reduces the overall environmental impact of a garment throughout its lifecycle.<br><br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Offers_Clothing_Longevity_Business_Models+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606540,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Supplier Wastewater Test Results+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Supplier_Wastewater_Test_Results+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Supplier Wastewater Test Results",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Disclosing wastewater test results publicly helps inform understanding around potential human health and environmental impacts and design appropriate remediation and capacity building. <br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_5_Water_Chemicals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Supplier_Wastewater_Test_Results+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606549,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Water Use+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Water_Use+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Water Use",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Measuring and publishing water usage data shows that a company is taking steps to understand and reduce its water footprint across its operations and supply chain. <br><br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Owned and operated facilities\":\"2\",\"Manufacturing and processing facilities\":\"4\",\"Raw material level\":\"4\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_5_Water_Chemicals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Water_Use+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606558,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Water-Related Risk Assessment Process+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Water_Related_Risk_Assessment_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Water-Related Risk Assessment Process",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Disclosing whether a company is conducting water-related risk assessments helps inform understanding around the environmental risks of a company's water footprint, as many companies source from/ operate in water-stressed countries and regions. <br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_5_Water_Chemicals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Water_Related_Risk_Assessment_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606567,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Decarbonisation Commitment+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Commitment+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Decarbonisation Commitment",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Decarbonisation is key to addressing a company's environmental impacts. Disclosing a commitment to decarbonisation across the supply chain means a company is commited to reducing its carbon footprint in its own operations and across its supply chain. <br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1273,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 332,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2023.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Commitment+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606576,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Decarbonisation Progress+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Progress+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Decarbonisation Progress",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Decarbonisation is key to addressing a company's environmental impacts. Disclosing a progress on decarbonisation across the supply chain means a company shows how it is taking action to reduce its carbon footprint in its own operations and across its supply chain.<br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1273,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 332,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2023.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Progress+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606612,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Zero Deforestation Progress+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Zero_Deforestation_Progress+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Zero Deforestation Progress",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Limiting deforestation is a crucial part of mitigating global carbon emissions. A zero-deforestation commitment shows that the company is working to minimise its use of fibres derived from ancient and endangered forests and forested areas that have been cleared or converted. <br><br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Zero_Deforestation_Progress+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606621,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Implementation of Regenerative Farming Practices+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Implementation_of_Regenerative_Farming_Practices+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Implementation of Regenerative Farming Practices",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>The fashion inudstry heavily relies on agriculture to produce its raw materials and yet, the environmental impacts of current agricutlural practices are often forgotten. Regenerative Agriculture is a system of farming principles and practices that increases biodiversity, enriches soils, improves watersheds, and enhances ecosystem services, including carbon sequestration. <br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Implementation_of_Regenerative_Farming_Practices+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606630,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Carbon Emissions+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Emissions+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Carbon Emissions",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Measuring and publishing carbon emissions data shows that a company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.<br><br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Owned and operated facilities\":\"2\",\"Supply chain\":\"4\",\"Raw material level (2021 only)\":\"4\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 778,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 285,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Emissions+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606639,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Absolute Energy Reduction+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Absolute_Energy_Reduction+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Absolute Energy Reduction",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This indicator focuses on absolute data rather than intensity. Absolute refers to the total amount of energy reduced in the supply chain. Whereas intensity is a metric that normalises a company's emissions or energy consumption relative to the businesses revenue, which allows emissions or energy use to increase as revenue increases.<br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Use_Score_2021_and_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Use_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Use_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Absolute_Energy_Reduction+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606648,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Renewable Energy Use+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Renewable_Energy_Use+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Renewable Energy Use",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing renewable energy data shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.<br>\n<br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Owned and operated facilities\":\"3.333333333333333\",\"Supply chain\":\"6.666666666666667\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Use_Score_2021_and_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Use_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Renewable_Energy_Use+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606743,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Late Wage Payments (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Late_Wage_Payments_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Late Wage Payments (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Brands purchasing practices during Covid-19 have had a huge impact on suppliers' ability to pay workers on time and adequately. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workers across global supply chains. <br>\nA note on the scoring system<br>\n<br>\nWikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 295,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Late_Wage_Payments_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606771,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2.2 Board Accountability for Human Rights & Environmental Issues",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Board_Accountability_for_Human_Rights_Environmental_Issues.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2.2 Board Accountability for Human Rights & Environmental Issues",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 2.2 Board Accountability for Human Rights & Environmental Issues in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>When a brand discloses the board member responsible for overseeing social and environmental performance within the company, and how that works in practice, it provides an indication of the significance placed on addressing these issues within the company.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7605883",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5962947",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5963200",
          "weight": 33.33
        }
      ],
      "answer": 822,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Governance_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Governance_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Board_Accountability_for_Human_Rights_Environmental_Issues+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606779,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2. Governance Score (2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Governance_Score_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2. Governance Score (2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 2. Governance in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p>The Fashion Transparency Index 2021 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p>This year for the second time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5975680",
          "weight": "46.15"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606794",
          "weight": "15.38"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7605856",
          "weight": "15.38"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606771",
          "weight": "23.08"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 322,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 322,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Mexico_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Governance_Score_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606787,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+COVID-19 Response",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "COVID-19 Response",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for their COVID-19 Response in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606090",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606099",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606108",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606743",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606117",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606126",
          "weight": "16.67"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606794,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2.3 Disclosure of Spending on Managing and Implementing CSR Activities+Fashion Transparency Index 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Disclosure_of_Spending_on_Managing_and_Implementing_CSR_Activities+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2.3 Disclosure of Spending on Managing and Implementing CSR Activities",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0 \"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 323,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 323,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Governance_Score_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Disclosure_of_Spending_on_Managing_and_Implementing_CSR_Activities+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606800,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Towards Paying Living Wages Score (2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Towards Paying Living Wages Score (2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for Towards Paying a Living Wage in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The majority of garment workers around the world are paid below a living wage rate. A wage increase is an urgent matter for supply chain workers enabling them to support themselves and their families. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5952070",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5951816",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5951561",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5951308",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5951055",
          "weight": "22.22"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5950801",
          "weight": "22.22"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606171",
          "weight": "11.11"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 778,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 285,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_Mexico_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_2022.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606808,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3. Traceability Score (2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3. Traceability Score (2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 3. Traceability in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p>The Fashion Transparency Index 2021 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p>This year for the second time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7605919",
          "weight": 35.14
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7605928",
          "weight": 35.14
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7605937",
          "weight": 29.73
        }
      ],
      "answer": 278,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 278,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Mexico_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606816,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.2 Supply Chain Policies",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Supply_Chain_Policies.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.2 Supply Chain Policies",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 1.2 Supply Chain Policies in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Policies outline the minimum human rights and environmental standards that companies require their vendors and partners to implement throughout the supply chain. Having supplier policies in place shows that the company takes some responsibility for the practises that happen within its supply chain.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7605775",
          "weight": "72.22"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5961430",
          "weight": "5.56"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5961177",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5960924",
          "weight": "11.11"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 822,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Policy_Commitments_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Supply_Chain_Policies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606824,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.4 Identification of Impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_4_Identification_of_Impacts.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.4 Identification of Impacts",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 1.4 Identification of Impacts in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>A materiality assessment discloses how the company identifies its most material human rights and environmental impacts.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5959659",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5959912",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5959406",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5959154",
          "weight": 33.33
        }
      ],
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Policy_Commitments_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_4_Identification_of_Impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606832,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Purchasing Practices Score (2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Purchasing Practices Score (2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5950548",
          "weight": "9.09"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5950295",
          "weight": "9.09"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606225",
          "weight": "18.18"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606234",
          "weight": "9.09"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5950042",
          "weight": "9.09"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606243",
          "weight": "18.18"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5949538",
          "weight": "18.18"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5949285",
          "weight": "9.09"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 778,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 285,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_Mexico_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606840,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1. Policy & Commitments Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Policy_Commitments_Score.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1. Policy & Commitments Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 1. Policy & Commitments in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7605766",
          "weight": "15.15"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606816",
          "weight": "27.27"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7605811",
          "weight": "45.45"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606824",
          "weight": "9.09"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5958900",
          "weight": "3.03"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 822,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Mexico_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Policy_Commitments_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606847,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Unionisation and Collective Bargaining Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Unionisation_and_Collective_Bargaining_Score.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Unionisation and Collective Bargaining Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Freedom of association and collective bargaining are fundamental labour rights enshrined within international law. When workers are able to freely join independent, democratically elected unions they are able to take collective action to negotiate with their employers for better working conditions, including wages and benefits.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5948779",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5949032",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606288",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606297",
          "weight": 25
        }
      ],
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_Mexico_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Unionisation_and_Collective_Bargaining_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606855,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.1 Decent Work & Purchasing Practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.1 Decent Work & Purchasing Practices",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5.1 Decent Work & Purchasing Practices in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>According to the ILO, working conditions are at the core of decent and dignified work. Generally speaking, working conditions cover a broad range of topics and issues, from working time (hours of work, rest periods, and work schedules) to remuneration, as well as the physical conditions and mental demands that exist in the workplaces. Here, we put the spotlight on some of the more egregious, thorny, endemic or hidden working conditions issues.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606787",
          "weight": "20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606800",
          "weight": "30"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606832",
          "weight": "36.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606847",
          "weight": "13.33"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606863,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Gender Equality Score (2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Gender Equality Score (2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for gender equality in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5948012",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5948273",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5948020",
          "weight": 25
        }
      ],
      "answer": 278,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 278,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Gender_Racial_Equality_Score_Mexico_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Gender_Racial_Equality_Score_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606871,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Racial Equality Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Racial_Equality_Score.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Racial Equality Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for racial equality in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606333",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606342",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606351",
          "weight": 33.33
        }
      ],
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 257,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Gender_Racial_Equality_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Gender_Racial_Equality_Score_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Racial_Equality_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606879,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.2 Gender & Racial Equality Score (2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Gender_Racial_Equality_Score_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.2 Gender & Racial Equality Score (2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for Gender & Racial Equality in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606863",
          "weight": 57.14
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606871",
          "weight": 42.86
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Gender_Racial_Equality_Score_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606886,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4.1 Know, Show & Fix: Due Diligence (2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1_Know_Show_Fix_Due_Diligence_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4.1 Know, Show & Fix: Due Diligence (2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 4.1 Know, Show & Fix: Due Diligence in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5971621",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5971368",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5948526",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5971115",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5970862",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5970609",
          "weight": "16.67"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 321,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 321,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1_Know_Show_Fix_Due_Diligence_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606894,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.4 Overconsumption, Waste & Circularity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.4 Overconsumption, Waste & Circularity",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5.4 Overconsumption, Waste & Circularity in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Ensuring sustainable production and consumption patterns, minimising excess, tackling textile waste and moving towards circularity.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5954852",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606432",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606441",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606450",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5954346",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5953588",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606477",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606486",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5953337",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5955864",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5955611",
          "weight": 9.09
        }
      ],
      "answer": 775,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 282,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_Mexico_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2022.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606902,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4.2 Know: Implementation of Supply Chain Policies (2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4.2 Know: Implementation of Supply Chain Policies (2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 4.2 Know: Implementation of Supply Chain Policies in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their labour and environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5968512",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5969847",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5969341",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606027",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606045",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5968765",
          "weight": "16.67"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 322,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 322,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606910,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.3 Sustainable Sourcing & Materials",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Sustainable_Sourcing_Materials.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.3 Sustainable Sourcing & Materials",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5.3 Sustainable Sourcing & Materials in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606360",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5957129",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5956876",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606387",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606396",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606405",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5956623",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5956370",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5956117",
          "weight": 11.11
        }
      ],
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_Mexico_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_3_Sustainable_Sourcing_Materials+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606918,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4.3 Show: Facility Assessments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_3_Show_Facility_Assessments.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4.3 Show: Facility Assessments",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 4.3 Show: Facility Assessments in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p>The Fashion Transparency Index 2020 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p>This year for the first time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5968259",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5968006",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5967753",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5967500",
          "weight": 37.5
        }
      ],
      "answer": 573,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 327,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2022.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_3_Show_Facility_Assessments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606925,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.5 Water & Chemicals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_5_Water_Chemicals.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.5 Water & Chemicals",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5.5 Water & Chemicals in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5955358",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5955105",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606540",
          "weight": "11.11"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606549",
          "weight": "55.56"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606558",
          "weight": "11.11"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 330,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_Mexico_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_5_Water_Chemicals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606941,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Decarbonisation, Deforestation and Regeneration Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Decarbonisation, Deforestation and Regeneration Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for Decarbonisation, Deforestation and Regeneration in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606567",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606576",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5958394",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5958647",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5958141",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606612",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606621",
          "weight": "14.29"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 323,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 323,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606948,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4. Know, Show & Fix Score (2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4. Know, Show & Fix Score (2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 4. Know, Show & Fix in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p>The Fashion Transparency Index 2021 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p>This year for the second time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606886",
          "weight": "12.77"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606902",
          "weight": "12.77"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606918",
          "weight": "51.06"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606957",
          "weight": "23.40"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 320,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 320,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Mexico_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606957,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4.4 Fix: Remediation (2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_Fix_Remediation_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4.4 Fix: Remediation (2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 4.4 Fix: Remediation in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p>The Fashion Transparency Index 2021 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p>This year for the second time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5977465",
          "weight": "27.27"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5976955",
          "weight": "72.73"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 322,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 322,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_Fix_Remediation_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606970,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Energy Use Score (2021 and 2022)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Use_Score_2021_and_2022.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Energy Use Score (2021 and 2022)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for Energy Use in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606639",
          "weight": 40
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606648",
          "weight": 60
        }
      ],
      "answer": 775,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 282,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity_2022.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Use_Score_2021_and_2022+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606978,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.6 Climate Change & Biodiversity (2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.6 Climate Change & Biodiversity (2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5.6 Climate Change & Biodiversity in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606941",
          "weight": 41.18
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606630",
          "weight": 29.41
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606970",
          "weight": 29.41
        }
      ],
      "answer": 278,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 278,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_Mexico_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7606986,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5. Spotlight Issues Score (2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5. Spotlight Issues Score (2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5. Spotlight Issues in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Fashion Transparency Index 2021 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This year for the first time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606855",
          "weight": "36.14"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606879",
          "weight": "8.43"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606910",
          "weight": "10.84"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606894",
          "weight": "13.25"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606925",
          "weight": "10.84"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606978",
          "weight": "20.48"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7608103,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Fashion Transparency Index 2021",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Fashion Transparency Index 2021",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021? ",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p>The Fashion Transparency Index 2021 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p>This year for the second time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606840",
          "weight": "13.20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606779",
          "weight": "5.20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606808",
          "weight": "29.60"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606948",
          "weight": "18.80"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606986",
          "weight": "33.20"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 247,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 247,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7615153,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Human Rights Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Human Rights Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following human rights performance indicators did the company disclose?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">This metric assesses how much a company discloses about their human rights policies, due diligence and mechanisms. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Below is a list of the metrics that are included in this assessment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Apparel Research Group+Human Rights Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var m3, m4, m5, noIsUnknown, numNo, researched;\n\n  if ([m3].flat()[0] === \"None\") {\n    m3 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  if ([m4].flat()[0] === \"In Development\") {\n    m4 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  if ([m5].flat()[0] === \"No - neither\") {\n    m5 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  noIsUnknown = [m4, m5, m6, m7, m8, m9, m10, m11, m12, m13, m14, m15, m16, m17, m18, m19, m20, m21, m22, m23];\n\n  numNo = noIsUnknown.filter(function(a) {\n    return [a].flat()[0] === \"No\";\n  }).length;\n\n  researched = [m1, m2, m3].concat(noIsUnknown).flat().filter(function(val) {\n    return val !== \"NR\";\n  });\n\n  (numKnown(researched) - numNo) / researched.length * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~837040",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~836973",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~6949027",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~2722444",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~1827651",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~7910568",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~5822088",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m8",
          "metric": "~7910187",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m9",
          "metric": "~7910422",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m10",
          "metric": "~7910197",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m11",
          "metric": "~7910432",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m12",
          "metric": "~7910207",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m13",
          "metric": "~7910442",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m14",
          "metric": "~7910217",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m15",
          "metric": "~7910452",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m16",
          "metric": "~7910227",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m17",
          "metric": "~7910462",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m18",
          "metric": "~7910287",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m19",
          "metric": "~7910472",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m20",
          "metric": "~7910297",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m21",
          "metric": "~7910492",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m22",
          "metric": "~7910307",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m23",
          "metric": "~7910513",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "+1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 291,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 97,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7615175,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Environmental Damage & Protection Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Damage_Protection_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Environmental Damage & Protection Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following environmental damage and protection indicators did the company disclose?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">This metric assesses how much a company discloses about their impact on the environment in terms of damages and protection. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Below is a list of the metrics that are included in this assessment.</p>",
      "methodology": "",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reputational Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Apparel Research Group+Environmental Damage & Protection Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var m2, researched;\n\n  if (m2 === \"No\") {\n    m2 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  researched = [m1, m2].filter(function(val) {\n    return val !== \"NR\";\n  });\n\n  numKnown(researched) / researched.length * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~801383",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5662009",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "-1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1260,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 727,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Damage_Protection_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Damage_Protection_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7615215,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Waste Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Waste Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for waste disclosure?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. This score is here to convert the underlying data to this 10-point scale and make it comparable. To see what data is feeding into this standardized score, dig one layer deeper.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1757,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 974,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7615219,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Workforce Disclosure Rate - Own Operations+Apparel Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations+Apparel_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Workforce Disclosure Rate - Own Operations",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for workforce disclosure - own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. This score is here to convert the underlying data to this 10-point scale and make it comparable. To see what data is feeding into this standardized score, dig one layer deeper.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 296,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Business_substainbility_and_social_impact_Group+Seek_Limited_SDG8.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations+Apparel_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7615233,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Workforce Disclosure Rate - Supply Chain+Apparel Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Supply_Chain+Apparel_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Workforce Disclosure Rate - Supply Chain",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for workforce disclosure - supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. This score is here to convert the underlying data to this 10-point scale and make it comparable. To see what data is feeding into this standardized score, dig one layer deeper.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1050,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 350,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Business_substainbility_and_social_impact_Group+Seek_Limited_SDG8.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Supply_Chain+Apparel_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7616258,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Public Commitment on Living Wage (Combined)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Public_Commitment_on_Living_Wage_Combined.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Public Commitment on Living Wage (Combined)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1 === \"Yes\") {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (m1 === \"No\") {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (m1 === \"Partial\") {\n    \"Partial\";\n  } else if (m2 === \"Yes\") {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (m2 === \"No\") {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "metric": "~5768845",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "metric": "~5822258",
          "name": "m2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1849,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 426,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Public_Commitment_on_Living_Wage_Combined+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7616271,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Isolating Labour Cost (Combined)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Isolating_Labour_Cost_Combined.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Isolating Labour Cost (Combined)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Yes Fair Wear Foundation",
        "Yes ACT",
        "Yes Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.match(/^Yes/)) {\n    m1.replace(\",\", \"\");\n  } else {\n    m2;\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5768917",
          "not_researched": "NR"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5822318",
          "unknown": "No",
          "not_researched": "No"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1132,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 320,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Isolating_Labour_Cost_Combined+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7616291,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Uses Living Wage Benchmark (Combined)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Uses_Living_Wage_Benchmark_Combined.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Uses Living Wage Benchmark (Combined)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Yes Asia Floor Wage",
        "Yes Global Living Wage Coalition (Anker)",
        "Yes Fair Wear Foundation Wage Ladders",
        "Yes FLA Wage Ladders",
        "Yes Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if ([m1].flat()[0].match(/^Yes/)) {\n    m1;\n  } else {\n    m2;\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5768899",
          "not_researched": "No"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5822288",
          "not_researched": "No",
          "unknown": "No"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Uses_Living_Wage_Benchmark_Combined+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7622473,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Responsible Sourcing Team (Step 1.B.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Responsible_Sourcing_Team_Step_1_B_1.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Responsible Sourcing Team (Step 1.B.1)",
      "question": "Does the company describe the management team in charge of responsible mineral sourcing/trade?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "<p>This question is looking to understand the company's management structure and responsibilities allocated to minerals due diligence and sourcing.</p>\r\n<p>A 'Yes' answer can include any kind of description of the individuals, departments or teams in charge of responsible minerals sourcing, and/or involvment of executives in such.</p>\r\n<p>If the management structure is not described in relevant reports, the answer will be 'No'.</p>\r\n<p>The answer will only be 'Unknown' if the company has no reporting for a particular year.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 629,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 354,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Responsible_Sourcing_Team_Step_1_B_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7622485,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Risk Mitigation Plan (Step 3.A.X)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risk_Mitigation_Plan_Step_3_A_X.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Risk Mitigation Plan (Step 3.A.X)",
      "question": "Does the company describe a risk mitigation plan?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "<p>This information will most likely be found in a Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report. </p>\r\n<p>If the company describes either the actions taken in case of identified risks (e.g. termination, continuation, suspension), or some kind of corrective action plan for supplier improvement, the answer will be 'Yes'.</p>\r\n<p>If the company has a Modern Slavery statement that is also a place where you might find this information, but the details must be explicitly related to the minerals chain in order to receive a 'Yes'.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (plan === \"Yes\") {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7624704",
          "name": "plan"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 804,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 459,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risk_Mitigation_Plan_Step_3_A_X+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7622497,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Supply Chain Audits (Step 4)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Supply_Chain_Audits_Step_4.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Supply Chain Audits (Step 4)",
      "question": "Does the downstream company audit its supply chain, specifically its Smelter and Refiners (SoRs)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This information will most likely be found in a Responsible Sourcing Policy, Code of Conduct, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report.</p>\r\n<p>This can be supply chain auditing conducted directly or through a third party.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 418,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 249,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Supply_Chain_Audits_Step_4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7622509,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Public Due Diligence Reporting (Step 5.X)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Public_Due_Diligence_Reporting_Step_5_X.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Public Due Diligence Reporting (Step 5.X)",
      "question": "Does the company report publicly on its supply chain due diligence?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information will most likely be found in a Responsible Sourcing Policy, Code of Conduct, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report.<br>\n<br>\nDisclosure on any sort of actions or activities aimed at monitoring supply chains (e.g. supplier engagement) are sufficient for a 'Yes' answer.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 698,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 424,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Public_Due_Diligence_Reporting_Step_5_X+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624093,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Living Wage Action Plan (Combined)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wage_Action_Plan_Combined.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Living Wage Action Plan (Combined)",
      "question": "Does the company have a public time bound action plan to pay living wage in their supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1 === \"Yes\" || m2 === \"Yes\") {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (m1 === \"Partial\") {\n    \"Partial\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "metric": "~5768881",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "metric": "~5822268",
          "name": "m2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1849,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 426,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wage_Action_Plan_Combined+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624260,
      "name": "Core+Minerals Sourced",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Minerals_Sourced.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Minerals Sourced",
      "question": "Which minerals does the company source?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "Select as many of the minerals as the company sources. If additional minerals are found, select 'Other' and list these in the Comments field.<br>\n<br>\nIf the minerals the company sources are not found, or the company does not source any minerals, the answer will be 'Unknown'.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Tin",
        "Tungsten",
        "Tantalum",
        "Gold",
        "Cobalt",
        "Copper",
        "Aluminuium",
        "Iron",
        "Other"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Minerals_Sourced+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624272,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy - Dated (Step 1.A.3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Responsible_Minerals_Sourcing_Policy_Dated_Step_1_A_3.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy - Dated (Step 1.A.3)",
      "question": "Is the company's due diligence policy for responsible minerals trade dated?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "Select an answer from the following options:<br>\nYes: responsible minerals sourcing policy has a date<br>\nNo: the company has a minerals sourcing policy, but it is not dated<br>\nUnknown: the company has no minerals sourcing policy<br>\nInclude the date in the Comments field.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 77,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 77,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Responsible_Minerals_Sourcing_Policy_Dated_Step_1_A_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624284,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy - 5-Step Framework Alignement (Step 1.A.4)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Responsible_Minerals_Sourcing_Policy_5_Step_Framework_Alignement_Step_1_A_4.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy - 5-Step Framework Alignement (Step 1.A.4)",
      "question": "Does the company report according to the OECD 5-Step framework in its responsible minerals sourcing policy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "If the company has a Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy, look for reporting according to the five steps in the OECD 5-step framework:<br>\nSTEP 1: Establish Strong Company Management Systems<br>\nSTEP 2: Identify and Assess Risks in the Supply Chain<br>\nSTEP 3: Respond to and Manage Risks<br>\nSTEP 4: Audit of Smelter and Refiner Due Diligence Practices<br>\nSTEP 5: Publicly Report on Due Diligence Actions<br>\n<br>\nIf reporting covers the 5-steps, the answer will be 'Yes'.<br>\nIf the company has a policy, but it doesn not align to the 5-steps, the answer will be 'No', and if the company does not have a Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy at all, the answer will be 'Unknown'.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 790,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 442,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Responsible_Minerals_Sourcing_Policy_5_Step_Framework_Alignement_Step_1_A_4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624296,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy - Frameworks (Step 1.A.5)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Responsible_Minerals_Sourcing_Policy_Frameworks_Step_1_A_5.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy - Frameworks (Step 1.A.5)",
      "question": "Does the company's responsible minerals sourcing policy mention any of the following frameworks: OECD Minerals Guidance, or Chinese Chamber of Commerce for Metals, Minerals & Chemicals (CCCMC) Guidelines?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "Select as many of the frameworks mentioned in the policy.<br>\nIf the company has a responsible sourcing policy, but mentions neither of the frameworks, the answer will be 'No'.<br>\nIf the company does not have a responsible sourcing policy, the answer will be 'Unknown'.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "OECD Minerals Guidance",
        "Chinese Chamber of Commerce for Metals",
        "Minerals & Chemicals (CCCMC) Guidelines",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 97,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 97,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Responsible_Minerals_Sourcing_Policy_Frameworks_Step_1_A_5+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624308,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Identified Conflict Affected and High Risk Areas (Step 1.A.6)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Identified_Conflict_Affected_and_High_Risk_Areas_Step_1_A_6.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Identified Conflict Affected and High Risk Areas (Step 1.A.6)",
      "question": "Does the company identify Conflict Affected and High Risk Areas (CAHRAs)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span></p>\r\n<p><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "Look for identification of Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (CAHRAs). This can be found in other documents besides the responsible sourcing policy (Code of Conduct, Webiste, Annual or Sustainability Report).<br>\n<br>\nInclude tools used for identification in the Comments field.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 77,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 77,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Identified_Conflict_Affected_and_High_Risk_Areas_Step_1_A_6+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624320,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy - Due Diligence Standards (Step 1.A.7)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Responsible_Minerals_Sourcing_Policy_Due_Diligence_Standards_Step_1_A_7.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy - Due Diligence Standards (Step 1.A.7)",
      "question": "Does the company's responsible minerals sourcing policy describe the standards against which due diligence should be conducted?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "Select as many of the standards mentioned in the policy.<br>\n<br>\n'Other' can include the Cobalt Industry Responsible Assessment Framework (CIRAF), Copper Mark, ResponsibleSteel or Aluminium Stewardship Initiative (ASI). Include the standard(s) mentioned in the Comments field.<br>\n<br>\nIf the company does not have a minerals sourcing policy, the answer will be 'Unknown'.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMAP)",
        "Responsible Jewelery Council (CoC and CoP)",
        "London Bullion Market Association (Gold Guidance)",
        "Dubai Multi Commodities Center (Rules for RBD-GPM)",
        "Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 100,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Responsible_Minerals_Sourcing_Policy_Due_Diligence_Standards_Step_1_A_7+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624332,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy - Public (Step 1.A.8.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Responsible_Minerals_Sourcing_Policy_Public_Step_1_A_8_1.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy - Public (Step 1.A.8.1)",
      "question": "Is the company's responsible minerals sourcing policy is accessible to the public?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "If the company has published its responsible minerals sourcing policy, the answer will be 'Yes'. If the company mentions having such a policy, but the policy cannot be found, the answer will be 'No'. <br>\nAs this question regards public reporting, 'Unknown' is not an answer option.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 794,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 447,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Responsible_Minerals_Sourcing_Policy_Public_Step_1_A_8_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624344,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Policy Inclusion (Step 1.A.8.2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Policy_Inclusion_Step_1_A_8_2.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Policy Inclusion (Step 1.A.8.2)",
      "question": "In which formats is the company’s responsible mineral policy included in its Sustainability (or similar) report?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "Select as many of the formats as were found included in other reports. If the company does not mention its responsible sourcing policy in other reports, the answer will be 'Not included'.<br>\n<br>\nIf the company does not have a minerals sourcing policy, the answer will be 'Unknown'.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Link to policy in report",
        "Policy included in full",
        "Not included"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 100,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Policy_Inclusion_Step_1_A_8_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624356,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Policy Format (Step 1.A.8.3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Policy_Format_Step_1_A_8_3.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Policy Format (Step 1.A.8.3)",
      "question": "In which formats is responsible minerals sourcing policy accessible: Downloadable document (e.g. PDF), Webpage?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "Select as many of the formats as were found.<br>\n<br>\nIf the company does not have a minerals sourcing policy, the answer will be 'Unknown'.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Downloadable document",
        "Webpage"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 101,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 101,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Policy_Format_Step_1_A_8_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624368,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Internal Management Structure - Due Diligence Program (Step 1.B.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Internal_Management_Structure_Due_Diligence_Program_Step_1_B_1.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Internal Management Structure - Due Diligence Program (Step 1.B.1)",
      "question": "Does the company describe the internal management of the minerals due diligence program including, the management structure and/or role of senior management?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "This question is looking to understand the company's management structure and whether senior management is included in decision making on minerals due diligence issues.<br>\n<br>\nSelect as many of the descriptions as were found.<br>\n<br>\nThe answer will only be 'Unknown' if the company has no reporting for a particular year. If relevant reports are found, but the management structure is not described, the answer will be 'No'.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes management structure",
        "Describes role of senior management",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 101,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 101,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Internal_Management_Structure_Due_Diligence_Program_Step_1_B_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624380,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Internal Management Resources - Due Diligence Program (Step 1.B.2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Internal_Management_Resources_Due_Diligence_Program_Step_1_B_2.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Internal Management Resources - Due Diligence Program (Step 1.B.2)",
      "question": "Does the company ensure availability of resources for internal management of its minerals due diligence program, including Financial, Human, Technical and/or General?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This question is looking to understand which resources a company uses for internal management of minerals due diligence. Any reources mentioned needs to be explicitly related to minerals due diligence.<br>\nExamples of statements: <br>\n'General Statement' example: Trainings <br>\n'Financial' example: A statement around financial support for the development of incident review process (with ITSCI)  <br>\n'Human' example: Hiring people for positions specifically dedicated to supply chain due diligence processes<br>\n<br>\nSelect as many of the resources as were found. If none of these are found the answer will be 'Unknown'.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Financial",
        "Human",
        "Technical",
        "General statement"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 100,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Internal_Management_Resources_Due_Diligence_Program_Step_1_B_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624392,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Chain of Custody/Traceability/Transparency System (Step 1.C.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Chain_of_Custody_Traceability_Transparency_System_Step_1_C_1.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Chain of Custody/Traceability/Transparency System (Step 1.C.1)",
      "question": "Does the company describe having a supply chain transparency, chain of custody, or traceability system in place?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>If the company mentions or describes implementing either a <strong>traceability</strong> system, a <strong>chain of custody</strong> system, or a <strong>supply chain transparency system</strong> the answer will be '<strong>Yes</strong>'.</p>\r\n<p>Include the description of the system in the Comments field.</p>\r\n<p>For <strong>upstream companies</strong>, look for a <strong>chain of custody</strong> or <strong>traceability system</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>For <strong>downstream companies</strong>, look for a <strong>transparency system</strong> that is used to identify SoRs, countries of origin, and transport and transit of the minerals for each of their SoRs.</p>\r\n<p>Key search words include: Certificate, Transport, Mine, Origin, Export, Import, Record, Trace, Chain.</p>\r\n<p>A Traceability System will have the ability to follow the trail of minerals along the supply chain by monitoring and tracking chain of custody.*</p>\r\n<p>A Chain of Custody system refers to all steps in a supply chain that take possession of the product, including miners, transporters, exporters, processors and manufacturers. It provides record of the sequence of entities that have custody of minerals as they move through a supply chain that allows the ability to trace a material back to its origin. Chain of custody will include documentation such as mine origin certificate, transport documentation, export and import records and factory*<br>A transparency system should identify and track Smelters or Refiners (SoRs), all countries of origins, and transport and transit of the minerals of each SoR.</p>\r\n<p>*see OECD Due Diligence Guidance for more detail http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (alignment.includes(\"No\")) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Yes\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7624452",
          "name": "alignment"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 723,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 445,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Chain_of_Custody_Traceability_Transparency_System_Step_1_C_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624404,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Minerals Supply Chain Mapping (Step 1.C.2.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Minerals_Supply_Chain_Mapping_Step_1_C_2_1.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Minerals Supply Chain Mapping (Step 1.C.2.1)",
      "question": "Has the company mapped its minerals supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "Companies that publish their minerals supply chain will typically do so on their websites, or if they have published a Conflict Minerals Report [see EDGAR SEC filings here], Smelters and Refiners are often listed there.Companies should not just say they have mapped their supply chain, but you should be able to find the names of suppliers in a list orl map.<br>\nAny additional details such as level of mapping (how many and which supplier types), can be added to the Comments field.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 771,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 433,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Minerals_Supply_Chain_Mapping_Step_1_C_2_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624416,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Minerals Supply Chain Source (Step 1.C.2.2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Minerals_Supply_Chain_Source_Step_1_C_2_2.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Minerals Supply Chain Source (Step 1.C.2.2)",
      "question": "Does the company provide the source of its minerals supply chain mapping information?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This question is looking for information about which sources were used to create the company's minerals supplier mapping. <br>\nSelect one of more of the categories which are mentioned and include relevant details in the Comments field.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Public- or Supplier-provided information",
        "Audit program",
        "Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 97,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 97,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Minerals_Supply_Chain_Source_Step_1_C_2_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624428,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Minerals Policy Alignment - Smelters and Refiners (Step 1.C.3.3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Minerals_Policy_Alignment_Smelters_and_Refiners_Step_1_C_3_3.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Minerals Policy Alignment - Smelters and Refiners (Step 1.C.3.3)",
      "question": "Is the company's responsible minerals policy aligned with recommendations specific to their supply chain location (Smelters and Refiners)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information is typically mentioned in the company's minerals sourcing policy, but could also be found in documents like Sustainability or Annual Reports.<br>\nAnswer option \"Contractually requires all local exporters, processors and international traders to disclose information listed under 1.C.3.1 of the grid\" includes 1) Taxes, fees and royalties paid to government for the extraction, trade, transport and export of minerals ; 2) Other payments to government; 3) Payment for public and/or private security forces or other armed groups; 4) Ownership structure; 5) Mine of minerals origin; 6) Quantity, dates and methods of extraction; 7) Location of minerals consolidated, traded and processed; 8) Identification of all upstream actors; 9) Identification of transportation routes<br>\nFor more details on alignment to the OECD Guidance, see Section C.3 of the Guidance (page 38) [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|here]]",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Contractually requires all local exporters processors and international traders to disclose information listed under 1.C.3.1 of the grid",
        "Maintains all Chain of Custody information for 5 years",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 34,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 34,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Minerals_Policy_Alignment_Smelters_and_Refiners_Step_1_C_3_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624440,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Minerals Policy Alignment - Upstream Companies (Step 1.C.3.4.2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Minerals_Policy_Alignment_Upstream_Companies_Step_1_C_3_4_2.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Minerals Policy Alignment - Upstream Companies (Step 1.C.3.4.2)",
      "question": "Is the company's responsible minerals policy aligned with recommendations specific to their supply chain location (Upstream Companies)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information is typically mentioned in the company's minerals sourcing policy, but could also be found in documents like Sustainability or Annual Reports.<br>\nFor more details on alignment to the OECD Guidance, see Section C.4 of the Guidance (page 38-39) [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|here]]",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Provides information collected on Chain of Custody/Traceability Systems to downstream purchasers and institutionalized mechanisms",
        "Adopts a cash-less policy or avoid when possible cash transfer",
        "Publicly supports the implementation of the EITI",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 15,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 15,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Minerals_Policy_Alignment_Upstream_Companies_Step_1_C_3_4_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624452,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Minerals Policy Alignment - Downstream Companies (Step 1.C.3.5)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Minerals_Policy_Alignment_Downstream_Companies_Step_1_C_3_5.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Minerals Policy Alignment - Downstream Companies (Step 1.C.3.5)",
      "question": "Is the company's responsible minerals policy aligned with recommendations specific to their supply chain location (Downstream Companies)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "<p>This information is typically mentioned in the company's minerals sourcing policy, but could also be found in documents like Sustainability or Annual Reports.</p>\r\n<p>For more details on alignment to the OECD Guidance, see Section C.5.1 and C.5.3 of the Guidance (page 39) [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|here]]</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Implements a smelter/refiner identification system",
        "Has transparency system through which they identify all countries of origin and transport and transit for the minerals in the supply chains of each of their smelters/refiners",
        "Supports digital information sharing systems on suppliers (including smelters/refiners)",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Chain_of_Custody_Traceability_Transparency_System_Step_1_C_1.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Minerals_Policy_Alignment_Downstream_Companies_Step_1_C_3_5+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624464,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Supplier Accountability (Step 1.D.1.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Supplier_Accountability_Step_1_D_1_1.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Supplier Accountability (Step 1.D.1.1)",
      "question": "Does the company say it requires suppliers to comply with the OECD Minerals Guidance?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information will most likely be found in the company's policy documents, though annual or sustainability reports can also be used as sources. <br>\n<br>\nKeyword search for 'OECD' and the 'Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development' to find references to the OECD Minerals Guidance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 75,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 75,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Supplier_Accountability_Step_1_D_1_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624476,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+OECD Minerals Guidance - Supplier Documents (Step 1.D.1.2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Supplier_Documents_Step_1_D_1_2.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "OECD Minerals Guidance - Supplier Documents (Step 1.D.1.2)",
      "question": "Does the company mention the OECD Minerals Guidance in supplier facing documents (e.g. Supplier Code of Conduct)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information will be found in Supplier-facing documents such as Codes of Conduct. <br>\n<br>\nKeyword search for 'OECD' and the 'Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development' to find references to the OECD Minerals Guidance.<br>\n<br>\nInclude information on which document mentions the Guidance in the Comments field.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 78,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 78,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Supplier_Documents_Step_1_D_1_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624488,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy - Purchasing Documents (Step 1.D.1.3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Responsible_Minerals_Sourcing_Policy_Purchasing_Documents_Step_1_D_1_3.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy - Purchasing Documents (Step 1.D.1.3)",
      "question": "Does the company include their responsible minerals sourcing policy in purchasing documents?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information will most likely be found in a Purchasing Policy document or Conflict Minerals Report. An example would be a statement that the company includes their responsible sourcing policy requirements in purchasing orders, contracts or similar documents.<br>\n<br>\nInclude information on which documents are mentioned in the Comments field.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 78,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 78,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Responsible_Minerals_Sourcing_Policy_Purchasing_Documents_Step_1_D_1_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624500,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy - Supplier Requirements (Step 1.D.1.4)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Responsible_Minerals_Sourcing_Policy_Supplier_Requirements_Step_1_D_1_4.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy - Supplier Requirements (Step 1.D.1.4)",
      "question": "Does the company describe cascading down responsible mineral sourcing/trading requirements for suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information could be found in a Code of Conduct, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report, for example. The description of cascading down requirements needs to be explicitly related to minerals sourcing/trade (e.g. requesting suppliers to also have a responsible minerals policy in place).<br>\nInclude information on which type of requirements are mentinoed in the Comments field.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 74,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 74,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Responsible_Minerals_Sourcing_Policy_Supplier_Requirements_Step_1_D_1_4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624512,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Direct Supplier Visits (Step 1.D.2.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Direct_Supplier_Visits_Step_1_D_2_1.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Direct Supplier Visits (Step 1.D.2.1)",
      "question": "Does the company describe visiting direct suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information could be found in a Responsible Sourcing Policy, Code of Conduct, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report for example. A 'Yes' answer includes site visits, but not most audits (as audits are primarily third-party).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 73,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 73,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Direct_Supplier_Visits_Step_1_D_2_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624524,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Bilateral SoR Engagement - Downstream Companies (Step 1.D.2.2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Bilateral_SoR_Engagement_Downstream_Companies_Step_1_D_2_2.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Bilateral SoR Engagement - Downstream Companies (Step 1.D.2.2)",
      "question": "Does the (downstream) company describe engaging bilateraly with Smelters and Refiners (SoRs)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information could be found in a Code of Conduct, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report, for example. This metric is only applicable to downstream companies.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 34,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 34,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Bilateral_SoR_Engagement_Downstream_Companies_Step_1_D_2_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624536,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Supplier Capacity Building (Step 1.D.2.3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Supplier_Capacity_Building_Step_1_D_2_3.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Supplier Capacity Building (Step 1.D.2.3)",
      "question": "Does the company describe capacity building programs with suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "<p>This information could be found in a Code of Conduct, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report, for example.</p>\r\n<p>Trainings or developing due diligence programs with minerals suppliers are examples of engagement.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Direct Support (bilateral)",
        "Indirect Support (industry organization)",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 101,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 101,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Supplier_Capacity_Building_Step_1_D_2_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624548,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Supplier Improvement Plan (Step 1.D.2.4)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Supplier_Improvement_Plan_Step_1_D_2_4.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Supplier Improvement Plan (Step 1.D.2.4)",
      "question": "Does the company describe a measurable, quantitative supplier improvement plan?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This question is looking for continuous improvement plans. For example, companies may provide statements with be timelines for improvement (\"we give the supplier 6 months...\").<br>\n<br>\nThe information will most likely be found in a Responsible Sourcing Policy, Code of Conduct, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 78,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 78,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Supplier_Improvement_Plan_Step_1_D_2_4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624560,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Grievance Mechanism (Step 1.E.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Grievance_Mechanism_Step_1_E_1.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism (Step 1.E.1)",
      "question": "Has the company has developed a grievance mechanism system?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "<p>This information could be found on a company website, in Policy documents, Codes of Conduct, Conflict Minerals Reports or Sustainability and Annual Reports. <br>The grievance mechanism can be a general mechanism (for all sorts of grievances) as long as it also specifically available to suppliers and/or other supply chain stakeholders, and is mentioned in relation to the minerals supply chain or within such documents. <br>Please include details about the grievance mechanism in the Comments field.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 775,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 442,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Grievance_Mechanism_Step_1_E_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624572,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Grievance Mechanism - All Parties (Step 1.E.2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Grievance_Mechanism_All_Parties_Step_1_E_2.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism - All Parties (Step 1.E.2)",
      "question": "Has the company opened its grievance system to all parties?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "A grievance mechanism that is open to all parties will mention this within the policy or system description. If the mechanism is public, include the email address, website URL and other key details in the Comments field.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 75,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 75,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Grievance_Mechanism_All_Parties_Step_1_E_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624584,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Grievance Mechanism - Collaborative (Step 1.E.3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Grievance_Mechanism_Collaborative_Step_1_E_3.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism - Collaborative (Step 1.E.3)",
      "question": "Is the company involved in a collaborative grievance system?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "A grievance mechanism that involves a third party will mention this. It could be a general statement or mention the specific collaboration - such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) Grievance Platform or Responsible Jewelery Council (RJC) complaints system.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 72,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 72,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Grievance_Mechanism_Collaborative_Step_1_E_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624596,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Step 1 Information Review (Step 2.A.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Step_1_Information_Review_Step_2_A_1.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Step 1 Information Review (Step 2.A.1)",
      "question": "Has the company established a system to accurately review the information they gathered in Step 1?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "<p>The information will most likely be found in a Responsible Sourcing Policy, Code of Conduct, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report, and needs to be explicitly related to the minerals chain.</p>\r\n<p>Information gathered in Step 1 includes: the country of origin of minerals and the types of risks and incidents they have identified through their grievance mechanism system, supplier engagement, and the chain of custody and traceability system. </p>\r\n<p>The statement from companies that they \"review the information\" will not be sufficient for a 'Yes' answer.</p>\r\n<p>The statements can be brief, but must include a description of the review process. In particular, search for Red Flags Assessments (RFA) as a key word.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Materiality Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 776,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 440,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Step_1_Information_Review_Step_2_A_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624608,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+CAHRAs Risk Comparison (Step 2.A.2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+CAHRAs_Risk_Comparison_Step_2_A_2.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "CAHRAs Risk Comparison (Step 2.A.2)",
      "question": "Does the company compare the risk/incident information gathered in Step 1 against its own definition of Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (CAHRAs)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "The information will most likely be found in a Responsible Sourcing Policy, Code of Conduct, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report, but needs to be explicitly related to the minerals chain.<br>\nThe company first need to define Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (CAHRAs) in its reporting. If this is done, and the company also mentions assessment of supplier risk/incident information within the CAHRAs identification, this counts as a 'Yes'.<br>\nConflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (CAHRAs) are countries and/or regions defined by the company as posing risks related to the extraction, trade, handling and transportation of its minerals. No official lists of these countries/regions exists and the definition is left to the discretion of the companies.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 78,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 78,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+CAHRAs_Risk_Comparison_Step_2_A_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624620,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Supply Chain Risk Identification (Step 2.A.3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Supply_Chain_Risk_Identification_Step_2_A_3.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Supply Chain Risk Identification (Step 2.A.3)",
      "question": "Has the company identified any risks in its minerals supply chains?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "<p>The information will most likely be found in a Responsible Sourcing Policy, Code of Conduct, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report, but needs to be explicitly related to the minerals chain.</p>\r\n<p>The company <strong>must clearly state that no red flags or risks have been identified</strong>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 76,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 76,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Supply_Chain_Risk_Identification_Step_2_A_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624632,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+On the Ground Assessments - Upstream Companies (Step 2.A.4)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+On_the_Ground_Assessments_Upstream_Companies_Step_2_A_4.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "On the Ground Assessments - Upstream Companies (Step 2.A.4)",
      "question": "Has the upstream company developed on-the-ground assessment systems, including one or more of the following?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "The information will most likely be found in a Responsible Sourcing Policy, Code of Conduct, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report, but needs to be explicitly related to the minerals chain.<br>\n<br>\nAssessments teams' roles will be clearly defined and must include first hand evidence of the conditions of extraction (e.g. militarization of mines), and handling and exports (e.g. illegal taxation).<br>\nThird parties are exclusively parties that are not linked to the company. It must be clearly stated that these visits are unannounced.<br>\nLocal traders and exporters identification includes companies that extract, handle and export minerals. There is no minimum number of identified companies, so as long as one company is identified, this suffices for a check mark. <br>\nAn evidence-based approach is understood to mean verifiable, reliable and up-to-date. For this category, a company must describe such a system and each of the three other criteria must be included for it to receive a check mark.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "On-the-ground assessment team",
        "Unannounced visits to mine sites by third parties",
        "Identification of local exporters and traders",
        "Use of evidence-based approach",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 53,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 53,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+On_the_Ground_Assessments_Upstream_Companies_Step_2_A_4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624644,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Supply Chain Risk Assessment Frameworks - Upstream Companies (Step 2.A.5)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Supply_Chain_Risk_Assessment_Frameworks_Upstream_Companies_Step_2_A_5.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Supply Chain Risk Assessment Frameworks - Upstream Companies (Step 2.A.5)",
      "question": "Does the upstream company asses its supply chain risks in line with the following documents/frameworks?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "The information will most likely be found in a Responsible Sourcing Policy, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report, but needs to be explicitly related to the minerals chain.<br>\nBusiness agreements include for example Client's Supplier Code of Conduct or minerals statement<br>\nInternational instruments include for example OECD MNE or ILO Conventions<br>\nInclude information on which instruments were used in the Comments field.<br>\nFor more detail see OECD Annex II Guidance [insert link]",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "OECD Guidance Annex II",
        "National Laws",
        "Business Agreements",
        "International Instruments",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 53,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 53,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Supply_Chain_Risk_Assessment_Frameworks_Upstream_Companies_Step_2_A_5+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624656,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+SoRs Identified - Downstream Companies (Step 2.A.6)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+SoRs_Identified_Downstream_Companies_Step_2_A_6.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "SoRs Identified - Downstream Companies (Step 2.A.6)",
      "question": "Has the downstream company identified Smelters or Refiners (SoRs) in its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "The information will most likely be found on the company's website or in a Conflict Minerals Report.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 36,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 36,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+SoRs_Identified_Downstream_Companies_Step_2_A_6+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624668,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+SoRs Reviewed - Downstream Companies (Step 2.A.7)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+SoRs_Reviewed_Downstream_Companies_Step_2_A_7.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "SoRs Reviewed - Downstream Companies (Step 2.A.7)",
      "question": "Does the downstream company review Smelters or Refiners' (SoRs) due diligence practices?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "This information will most likely be found in a Sustainability Report, Conflict Minerals Report or on the company's website.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 36,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 36,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+SoRs_Reviewed_Downstream_Companies_Step_2_A_7+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624680,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Risk Mitigation Actions (Step 3.A.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Risk_Mitigation_Actions_Step_3_A_1.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Risk Mitigation Actions (Step 3.A.1)",
      "question": "Has the company defined one or more of the following actions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information will most likely be found in a Sustainability Report, Conflict Minerals Report or Responsible Sourcing Policy, in relation to actions taken with suppliers as part of the company's risk mitigation actions. A statement that says they defined the different categories is sufficient for Yes. If definitions are disclosed, include these in the Comments field.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Continuation",
        "Suspension",
        "Termination",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 100,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Risk_Mitigation_Actions_Step_3_A_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624692,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Supplier Risk Engagement - Downstream Companies (Step 3.A.2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Supplier_Risk_Engagement_Downstream_Companies_Step_3_A_2.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Supplier Risk Engagement - Downstream Companies (Step 3.A.2)",
      "question": "Has the downstream company engaged directly with upstream suppliers regarding identified risks?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information will most likely be found in a Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report. Include relevant details in the Comments field.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 64,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 64,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Supplier_Risk_Engagement_Downstream_Companies_Step_3_A_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624704,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Risk Mitigation Plan (Step 3.A.3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risk_Mitigation_Plan_Step_3_A_3.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Risk Mitigation Plan (Step 3.A.3)",
      "question": "Has the company created a measurable risk mitigation plan?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "<p>This information will most likely be found in a Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report.</p>\r\n<p>For example, after an audit, the company may give the audited supplier a check-list with improvement points (often refered to as a Corrective Action Plan).</p>\r\n<p>If the company has a Modern Slavery statement that is also a place where you might find this information, but the details must be explicitly related to the minerals chain in order to receive a 'Yes'.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 77,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 77,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risk_Mitigation_Plan_Step_3_A_X.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risk_Mitigation_Plan_Step_3_A_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624716,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Risk Mitigation Plan - Stakeholders (Step 3.A.4)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risk_Mitigation_Plan_Stakeholders_Step_3_A_4.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Risk Mitigation Plan - Stakeholders (Step 3.A.4)",
      "question": "Has the company created a risk mitigation plan with input from stakeholders?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "This information will most likely be found in a Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 76,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 76,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risk_Mitigation_Plan_Stakeholders_Step_3_A_4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624728,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Risk Assessment Publication - Upstream Companies (Step 3.A.5)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Risk_Assessment_Publication_Upstream_Companies_Step_3_A_5.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Risk Assessment Publication - Upstream Companies (Step 3.A.5)",
      "question": "Has the upstream company published their risk assessment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information will most likely be found in a Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report. Include any relevant details in the Comments field.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Risk_Assessment_Publication_Upstream_Companies_Step_3_A_5+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624740,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Supply Chain Management Publication - Upstream Companies (Step 3.A.6)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Supply_Chain_Management_Publication_Upstream_Companies_Step_3_A_6.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Supply Chain Management Publication - Upstream Companies (Step 3.A.6)",
      "question": "Has the upstream company published the supply chain management plan?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information will most likely be found on the company's website or in a Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report. A supply chain management plan could include how the company engages with its clients and its clients Smelters or Refiners. Include any relevant details in the Comments field.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Supply_Chain_Management_Publication_Upstream_Companies_Step_3_A_6+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624752,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Ongoing Risk Mitigation Measures (Step 3.B.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Ongoing_Risk_Mitigation_Measures_Step_3_B_1.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Ongoing Risk Mitigation Measures (Step 3.B.1)",
      "question": "Does the company implement ongoing and proactive risk mitigation measures?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information will most likely be found on the company's website or in a Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report. An example of ongoing and proactive risk mitigation measures would be the company supporting SoRs that are not yet part of its supply chain to improve their due diligence. This could be for instance in a mineral supply chain that they do not operate in (e.g. Volkswagen supporting improvement in the lithium supply chain in South America).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 74,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 74,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Ongoing_Risk_Mitigation_Measures_Step_3_B_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624764,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Risks Mitigation Assessments - Mid- Long-term (Step 3.B.2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risks_Mitigation_Assessments_Mid_Long_term_Step_3_B_2.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Risks Mitigation Assessments - Mid- Long-term (Step 3.B.2)",
      "question": "Does the company implement medium to long-term assessment reviews of mitigated risks?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "This information will most likely be found on the company's website or in a Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report, and includes repeated and continued vetting and auditing of suppliers.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 777,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 442,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risks_Mitigation_Assessments_Mid_Long_term_Step_3_B_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624776,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Third-party Certification Audits Supported (Step 4.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Third_party_Certification_Audits_Supported_Step_4_1.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Third-party Certification Audits Supported (Step 4.1)",
      "question": "Does the downstream company support third-party certification audits, including one or more of the following?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "This information will most likely be found on the company's website or in a Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report, and includes repeated and continued vetting and auditing of suppliers.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI)",
        "London Bullion Market Association (LBMA)",
        "Responsible Jewelery Council (RJC)",
        "Dubai Multi Commodity Center (DMCC)",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Third_party_Certification_Audits_Supported_Step_4_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624788,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Third-party Certification Audits Supported (Step 4.2, 4.3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Third_party_Certification_Audits_Supported_Step_4_2_4_3.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Third-party Certification Audits Supported (Step 4.2, 4.3)",
      "question": "Does the company (upstream or midstream) support third-party certification audits, including one or more of the following?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "According to the OECD Guidance, downstream companies should be publishing these results. Nevertheless, sometimes other companies share this information, and this metric is designed to capture these cases.<br>\nThe answers will most likely be found in a Responsible Sourcing Policy, Code of Conduct, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report. Select as many of the options as found.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Aluminium Stewardship Initiative (ASI)",
        "Cobalt Industry Responsible Assessment Framework (CIRAF)",
        "The Copper Mark",
        "Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA)",
        "International Tin Supply Chain Initiative (ITSCI)",
        "Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI)/Responsible Cobalt Initiative (RCI)",
        "ResponsibleSteel Standard",
        "Toward Sustainability in Mining (TSM)",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 44,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 44,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Third_party_Certification_Audits_Supported_Step_4_2_4_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624800,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Third-party Certification Audits Publication (Step 4.4)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Third_party_Certification_Audits_Publication_Step_4_4.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Third-party Certification Audits Publication (Step 4.4)",
      "question": "Does the company (downstream or upstream) publish certification audit reports directly or via a third-party?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "According to the OECD Guidance, Smelters or Refiners (SoRs), or the third party auditors, should be publishing these results. Nevertheless, sometimes other companies share this information, and this metric is designed to capture these cases.<br>\nThe answer will most likely be found in a Responsible Sourcing Policy, Code of Conduct, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report. If the company mentions the following third-party auditors which publish results, they receive a 'Yes': Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), London Bullion Market Association (LBMA), or Responsible Jewelery Council (RJC)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Third_party_Certification_Audits_Publication_Step_4_4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624811,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Third-party Certification Audits Publication (Step 4.4)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Third_party_Certification_Audits_Publication_Step_4_4.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Third-party Certification Audits Publication (Step 4.4)",
      "question": "Does the smelter or refiner company publish certification audit reports directly or via a third-party?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "<p>This information will most likely be found in a Responsible Sourcing Policy, Code of Conduct, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report.</p>\r\n<p>If the company mentions the following third-party auditors which publish results, they receive a 'Yes':</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI),</li>\r\n<li>London Bullion Market Association (LBMA), or</li>\r\n<li>Responsible Jewelery Council (RJC)</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 29,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 29,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Third_party_Certification_Audits_Publication_Step_4_4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624823,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Risks Listed - Serious Abuses (6.A.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risks_Listed_Serious_Abuses_6_A_1.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Risks Listed - Serious Abuses (6.A.1)",
      "question": "Which of the following serious abuse risks does the company include in its responsible minerals sourcing policy (select all options that apply)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "The answers must be found in the company's responsible minerals sourcing/trading policy. A sustainability report, supplier code of conduct, or other document does not apply.<br>\nIt is important the same keywords are mentioned.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Serious abuses associated with the extraction transport or trade of minerals",
        "Torture cruel and inhumane treatment",
        "Forced or compulsory work",
        "Child Labor/Worst Forms of Child Labor",
        "Other forms of violence",
        "War crimes and international humanitarian law violations",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 791,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 443,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risks_Listed_Serious_Abuses_6_A_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624835,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Risks Listed - Non-State Armed Groups (6.A.2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risks_Listed_Non_State_Armed_Groups_6_A_2.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Risks Listed - Non-State Armed Groups (6.A.2)",
      "question": "Does the company include direct or indirect support to non-state armed groups as a risk in its responsible minerals sourcing policy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "The answer must be found in the company's responsible minerals sourcing/trading policy. A sustainability report, supplier code of conduct, or other document does not apply.<br>\nIt is important the same keywords are mentioned.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 789,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 442,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risks_Listed_Non_State_Armed_Groups_6_A_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624847,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Risks Listed - Public or private security forces (6.A.3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risks_Listed_Public_or_private_security_forces_6_A_3.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Risks Listed - Public or private security forces (6.A.3)",
      "question": "Does the company include public or private security forces as a risk in its responsible minerals sourcing policy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "The answer must be found in the company's responsible minerals sourcing/trading policy. A sustainability report, supplier code of conduct, or other document does not apply.<br>\nIt is important the same keywords are mentioned.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 786,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 441,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risks_Listed_Public_or_private_security_forces_6_A_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624859,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Risks Listed - Bribery (6.A.4)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risks_Listed_Bribery_6_A_4.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Risks Listed - Bribery (6.A.4)",
      "question": "Does the company include bribery and fraudulent misrepresentation of the origin of minerals as a risk in public facing documents?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "This information could be found in a Responsible Sourcing Policy, Code of Conduct, or Sustainability, Annual or Conflict Minerals Report.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 340,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 272,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risks_Listed_Bribery_6_A_4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624871,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Risks Listed - Money Laundering (6.A.5)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risks_Listed_Money_Laundering_6_A_5.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Risks Listed - Money Laundering (6.A.5)",
      "question": "Does the company include money laundering as a risk in its responsible minerals sourcing policy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "The answer must be found in the company's responsible minerals sourcing/trading policy. A sustainability report, supplier code of conduct, or other document does not apply.<br>\nIt is important the same keywords are mentioned.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 374,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 277,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risks_Listed_Money_Laundering_6_A_5+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624883,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Risks Listed - Government taxes, fees and royalties (6.A.6)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risks_Listed_Government_taxes_fees_and_royalties_6_A_6.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Risks Listed - Government taxes, fees and royalties (6.A.6)",
      "question": "Does the company include payment of taxes, fees and royalties due to governments as a risk in its responsible minerals sourcing policy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "The answer must be found in the company's responsible minerals sourcing/trading policy. A sustainability report, supplier code of conduct, or other document does not apply.<br>\nIt is important the same keywords are mentioned.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 788,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 441,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risks_Listed_Government_taxes_fees_and_royalties_6_A_6+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624895,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Risks Listed - EITI Standard (6.A.6.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risks_Listed_EITI_Standard_6_A_6_1.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Risks Listed - EITI Standard (6.A.6.1)",
      "question": "Does the company recognize the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "This information could be found in a Responsible Sourcing Policy, Code of Conduct, or Sustainability, Annual or Conflict Minerals Report.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 791,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 442,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Risks_Listed_EITI_Standard_6_A_6_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624907,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+OECD Minerals Guidance (Step 1.A.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Step_1_A_1.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "OECD Minerals Guidance (Step 1.A.1)",
      "question": "Has the company mentioned the OECD Minerals Guidance in public documents?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "<p>Look for reference to the OECD Minerals Guidance in Annual or Sustainability Reports, Codes of Conduct, and other public documents. The company may include a mention to the full title of the Minerals Guidance or a shorter version. <br><br>Keyword search for 'OECD' and the 'Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development' to find references.<br><br>In order to receive a 'Yes', the guidance mentioned must be the Minerals Guidance (not for example the OECD guidance for Multinational Enterprises or Responsible Business Conduct).<br><br>If you do not find any mention of the Minerals Guidance, the answer is 'No'. As this question regards public reporting, 'Unknown' is not an answer option.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 777,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 437,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Step_1_A_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624919,
      "name": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)+Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy (Step 1.A.2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Responsible_Minerals_Sourcing_Policy_Step_1_A_2.json",
      "designer": "Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD)",
      "title": "Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy (Step 1.A.2)",
      "question": "Has the company developed a due diligence policy for responsible minerals trade?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.<br>\n<br>\nThe [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.",
      "methodology": "Look for a policy covering Responsible Minerals Sourcing. Such policies may be referred to using different terms including: responsible minerals sourcing, responsible minerals trading or due diligence policy for responsible minerals.<br>\n<br>\nTo receive a 'Yes' answer, the company policy must be focused on minerals sourcing and/or raw materials. A Conflict Minerals Report filed to the SEC, or a Code of Conduct document does not count as a responsible minerals sourcing policy. Some companies will include a link to their Conflict Minerals Policy in the Conflict Minerals Report, or include the entire policy in an annex to the Report and in those cases, the Conflict Minerals Policy counts as a 'Yes'.<br>\n<br>\nSearch for companies' Conflict Minerals Report filings (which may link to responsible sourcing policies) in the [[https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html|EDGAR company filings database]]. Find tips for navigating the database [[https://wikirate.org/Finding_Conflict_Minerals_Reports|here]].<br>\n<br>\nFor holding companies, if such a policy is referenced for one of its related entities that produce or distribute minerals, the policy may also count as the holding company's policy.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 789,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 443,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Organisation_for_Economic_Cooperation_Development_OECD+Responsible_Minerals_Sourcing_Policy_Step_1_A_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624931,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Minerals Policy Alignment - Local Mineral Exporters (Step 1.C.3.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Minerals_Policy_Alignment_Local_Mineral_Exporters_Step_1_C_3_1.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Minerals Policy Alignment - Local Mineral Exporters (Step 1.C.3.1)",
      "question": "Is the company's responsible minerals policy aligned with recommendations specific to their supply chain location (Local Mineral Exporters)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information is typically mentioned in the company's minerals sourcing policy, but could also be found in documents like Sustainability or Annual Reports.<br>\n<br>\nFor more details on the alignment to the OECD Guidance, see Section C.1 of the Guidance (page 37) [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|here]]",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Taxes fees and royalties paid to government for the extraction trade transport and export of mineral",
        "Other payments to government",
        "Payment for public and/or private security forces or other armed groups",
        "Company's ownership structure",
        "Mine of minerals origin",
        "Quantity, dates and methods of extraction",
        "Location of minerals consolidated, traded and processed",
        "Identification of all upstream actors",
        "Identification of trading routes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Minerals_Policy_Alignment_Local_Mineral_Exporters_Step_1_C_3_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624943,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Minerals Policy Alignment - International Traders (Step 1.C.3.2)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Minerals_Policy_Alignment_International_Traders_Step_1_C_3_2.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Minerals Policy Alignment - International Traders (Step 1.C.3.2)",
      "question": "Is the company's responsible minerals policy aligned with recommendations specific to their supply chain location (International Traders)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information is typically mentioned in the company's minerals sourcing policy, but could also be found in documents like Sustainability or Annual Reports.<br>\nAnswer option \"Contractually requires local exporters to disclose information listed under 1.C.3.1 of the grid\" includes 1) Taxes, fees and royalties paid to government for the extraction, trade, transport and export of minerals ; 2) Other payments to government; 3) Payment for public and/or private security forces or other armed groups; 4) Ownership structure; 5) Mine of minerals origin; 6) Quantity, dates and methods of extraction; 7) Location of minerals consolidated, traded and processed; 8) Identification of all upstream actors; 9) Identification of transportation routes<br>\nFor more details on the alignment to the OECD Guidance, see Section C.2 of the Guidance (page 38) [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|here]]",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Contractually requires local exporters to disclose information listed under 1.C.3.1 of the grid",
        "Provides all import/export documentation to immediate downstream purchasers and institutionalized mechanisms",
        "Provides identification of upstream suppliers (local exporters) to immediate downstream purchasers and institutionalized mechanisms",
        "Provides 1.C.3.1. information obtained from local exporters to immediate downstream purchasers and institutionalized mechanisms",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Minerals_Policy_Alignment_International_Traders_Step_1_C_3_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624955,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Minerals Policy Alignment - Upstream Traceability & Chain of Custody (Step 1.C.3.4.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Minerals_Policy_Alignment_Upstream_Traceability_Chain_of_Custody_Step_1_C_3_4_1.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Minerals Policy Alignment - Upstream Traceability & Chain of Custody (Step 1.C.3.4.1)",
      "question": "Does the company's responsible minerals policy include a chain of custody or traceability system through which they gather one or more of the following?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information is typically mentioned in the company's minerals sourcing policy, but could also be found in documents like Sustainability or Annual Reports.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Mine of minerals origin",
        "Quantity dates and method of extraction",
        "Location where minerals are consolidated traded and processed",
        "Taxes fees and royalties paid to government for the purposes of extraction trade transport and export of minerals or other payments to governments",
        "Taxes and payments for public and/or private security forces or other armed groups",
        "Identification of all upstream actors",
        "Identification of transportation routes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Minerals_Policy_Alignment_Upstream_Traceability_Chain_of_Custody_Step_1_C_3_4_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624970,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Volume of Minerals Produced/Used - Tin",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Volume_of_Minerals_Produced_Used_Tin.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Volume of Minerals Produced/Used - Tin",
      "question": "How much Tin has the company used or produced (in metric tonnes)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information will most likely be found in on the company's website or in an Annual or Sustainability Report. <br>\nBe sure to convert units where volumes are reported in a unit other than metric tons. Conversions should be noted in the Comments field.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mining Impacts on Land",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 155,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Volume_of_Minerals_Produced_Used_Tin+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624982,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Volume of Minerals Produced/Used - Tungsten",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Volume_of_Minerals_Produced_Used_Tungsten.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Volume of Minerals Produced/Used - Tungsten",
      "question": "How much Tungsten  has the company used or produced (in metric tonnes)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information will most likely be found in on the company's website or in an Annual or Sustainability Report. <br>\nBe sure to convert units where volumes are reported in a unit other than metric tons. Conversions should be noted in the Comments field.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 129,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 91,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Volume_of_Minerals_Produced_Used_Tungsten+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7624994,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Volume of Minerals Produced/Used - Tantalum",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Volume_of_Minerals_Produced_Used_Tantalum.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Volume of Minerals Produced/Used - Tantalum",
      "question": "How much Tantalum has the company used or produced (in metric tonnes)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information will most likely be found in on the company's website or in an Annual or Sustainability Report. <br>\nBe sure to convert units where volumes are reported in a unit other than metric tons. Conversions should be noted in the Comments field.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 80,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Volume_of_Minerals_Produced_Used_Tantalum+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7625006,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Volume of Minerals Produced/Used - Gold",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Volume_of_Minerals_Produced_Used_Gold.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Volume of Minerals Produced/Used - Gold",
      "question": "How much Gold has the company used or produced (in metric tonnes)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information will most likely be found in on the company's website or in an Annual or Sustainability Report. <br>\nBe sure to convert units where volumes are reported in a unit other than metric tons. Conversions should be noted in the Comments field.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mining Impacts on Land",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 232,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 151,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Volume_of_Minerals_Produced_Used_Gold+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7625018,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Volume of Minerals Produced/Used - Cobalt",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Volume_of_Minerals_Produced_Used_Cobalt.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Volume of Minerals Produced/Used - Cobalt",
      "question": "How much Cobalt has the company used or produced (in metric tonnes)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "This information will most likely be found in on the company's website or in an Annual or Sustainability Report. <br>\nBe sure to convert units where volumes are reported in a unit other than metric tons. Conversions should be noted in the Comments field.",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 63,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Volume_of_Minerals_Produced_Used_Cobalt+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7625030,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Volume of Minerals Produced/Used - Copper",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Volume_of_Minerals_Produced_Used_Copper.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Volume of Minerals Produced/Used - Copper",
      "question": "How much Copper has the company used or produced (in metric tonnes)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a></span><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This information will most likely be found in on the company's website or in an Annual or Sustainability Report.</p>\r\n<p>Be sure to convert units where volumes are reported in a unit other than metric tons. Conversions should be noted in the Comments field.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mining Impacts on Land",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 121,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 76,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Volume_of_Minerals_Produced_Used_Copper+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7731490,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Transparency Beyond Basic Pledge Standard (Combined)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Transparency_Beyond_Basic_Pledge_Standard_Combined.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Transparency Beyond Basic Pledge Standard (Combined)",
      "question": "Does the company provide extra information, for instance gender and migrant composition of the workforce or trade union recognition?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Clean Clothes Campaign+Transparency Beyond Basic Pledge Standard (Combined)+Clean Clothes Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var options;\n\n  options = [\"Sex-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site\", \"If facility has trade union\", \"If the facility has an independent worker committee\", \"% or number of migrant or contract workers\", \"Certifications, if any, the facility has (2021 only)\", \"List is publicly available as a csv or Excel spreadsheet\", \"Discloses what percentage of its tier one factories is published\"];\n\n  if (ccc_beyond === \"Yes\" || [tier1_disclosure].flat().some(function(v) {\n    return options.includes(v);\n  }) || open_list === \"Yes\") {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "metric": "~5768872",
          "name": "ccc_beyond"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "metric": "~5821888",
          "name": "tier1_disclosure"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "metric": "~19689687",
          "name": "open_list"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1807,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 431,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Transparency_Beyond_Basic_Pledge_Standard_Combined+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Transparency_Beyond_Basic_Pledge_Standard_Combined+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7733755,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Supplier Disclosure (combined)+Clean Clothes Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supplier_Disclosure_combined+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Supplier Disclosure (combined)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1809,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 434,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Transparency_Score_testing.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Transparency_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supplier_Disclosure_combined+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7733759,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Open Format for Supply Chain Disclosure (Combined)+Clean Clothes Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Open_Format_for_Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Combined+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Open Format for Supply Chain Disclosure (Combined)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1807,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 431,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Transparency_Score_testing.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Transparency_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Open_Format_for_Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Combined+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7733764,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Transparency Beyond Basic Pledge Standard (Combined)+Clean Clothes Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Transparency_Beyond_Basic_Pledge_Standard_Combined+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Transparency Beyond Basic Pledge Standard (Combined)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1807,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 431,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Transparency_Beyond_Basic_Pledge_Standard_Combined+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7761172,
      "name": "Commons+Standard Industrial Classification Code",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Standard_Industrial_Classification_Code.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Standard Industrial Classification Code",
      "question": "What is the company's Industry Code based on the Standard Industrial Classification system?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The <strong>Standard Industrial Classification</strong> (SIC) is a system for <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industry_classification\" title=\"\"\" href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industry_classification\"\">classifying industries</a> by a four-digit code. Established in the <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States\" title=\"United States\">United States</a> in 1937, it is used by government agencies to classify industry areas. The SIC system is also used by agencies in other countries, e.g., by the <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom\" title=\"\"\" href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom\"\">United Kingdom</a>'s <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Companies_House\" title=\"United Kingdom\">Companies House</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": "{\r\n\t\"Agricultural Production-Crops\": \"0100\",\r\n\t\"Agricultural Prod-Livestock & Animal Specialties\": \"0200\",\r\n\t\"Agricultural Services\": \"0700\",\r\n\t\"Forestry\": \"0800\",\r\n\t\"Fishing Hunting and Trapping\": \"0900\",\r\n\t\"Metal Mining\": \"1000\",\r\n\t\"Gold and Silver Ores\": \"1040\",\r\n\t\"Miscellaneous Metal Ores\": \"1090\",\r\n\t\"Bituminous Coal & Lignite Mining\": \"1220\",\r\n\t\"Bituminous Coal & Lignite Surface Mining\": \"1221\",\r\n\t\"Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas\": \"1311\",\r\n\t\"Drilling Oil & Gas Wells\": \"1381\",\r\n\t\"Oil & Gas Field Exploration Services\": \"1382\",\r\n\t\"Oil & Gas Field Services NEC\": \"1389\",\r\n\t\"Mining & Quarrying of Nonmetallic Minerals (No Fuels)\": \"1400\",\r\n\t\"General Bldg Contractors - Residential Bldgs\": \"1520\",\r\n\t\"Operative Builders\": \"1531\",\r\n\t\"General Bldg Contractors - Nonresidential Bldgs\": \"1540\",\r\n\t\"Heavy Construction Other Than Bldg Const - Contractors\": \"1600\",\r\n\t\"Water Sewer Pipeline Comm & Power Line Construction\": \"1623\",\r\n\t\"Heavy Construction Not Elsewhere Classified[9]\": \"1629\",\r\n\t\"Construction - Special Trade Contractors\": \"1700\",\r\n\t\"Electrical Work\": \"1731\",\r\n\t\"Food and Kindred Products\": \"2000\",\r\n\t\"Meat Packing Plants\": \"2011\",\r\n\t\"Sausages & Other Prepared Meat Products\": \"2013\",\r\n\t\"Poultry Slaughtering and Processing\": \"2015\",\r\n\t\"Dairy Products\": \"2020\",\r\n\t\"Ice Cream & Frozen Desserts\": \"2024\",\r\n\t\"Canned Frozen & Preserved Fruit Veg & Food Specialties\": \"2030\",\r\n\t\"Canned Fruits Veg Preserves Jams & Jellies\": \"2033\",\r\n\t\"Grain Mill Products\": \"2040\",\r\n\t\"Bakery Products\": \"2050\",\r\n\t\"Cookies & Crackers\": \"2052\",\r\n\t\"Sugar & Confectionery Products\": \"2060\",\r\n\t\"Fats & Oils\": \"2070\",\r\n\t\"Beverages\": \"2080\",\r\n\t\"Malt Beverages\": \"2082\",\r\n\t\"Bottled & Canned Soft Drinks & Carbonated Waters\": \"2086\",\r\n\t\"Miscellaneous Food Preparations & Kindred Products\": \"2090\",\r\n\t\"Prepared Fresh or Frozen Fish & Seafood\": \"2092\",\r\n\t\"Tobacco Products\": \"2100\",\r\n\t\"Cigarettes\": \"2111\",\r\n\t\"Textile Mill Products\": \"2200\",\r\n\t\"Broadwoven Fabric Mills Cotton\": \"2211\",\r\n\t\"Broadwoven Fabric Mills Man Made Fiber & Silk\": \"2221\",\r\n\t\"Knitting Mills\": \"2250\",\r\n\t\"Knit Outerwear Mills\": \"2253\",\r\n\t\"Carpets & Rugs\": \"2273\",\r\n\t\"Apparel & Other Finished Prods of Fabrics & Similar Matl\": \"2300\",\r\n\t\"Men's & Boys' Furnishings Work Clothing & Allied Garments\": \"2320\",\r\n\t\"Women's Misses' and Juniors Outerwear\": \"2330\",\r\n\t\"Women's Misses' Children's & Infant's Undergarments\": \"2340\",\r\n\t\"Miscellaneous Fabricated Textile Products\": \"2390\",\r\n\t\"Lumber & Wood Products (No Furniture)\": \"2400\",\r\n\t\"Sawmills & Planing Mills General\": \"2421\",\r\n\t\"Millwood Veneer Plywood & Structural Wood Members\": \"2430\",\r\n\t\"Mobile Homes\": \"2451\",\r\n\t\"Prefabricated Wood Bldgs & Components\": \"2452\",\r\n\t\"Household Furniture\": \"2510\",\r\n\t\"Wood Household Furniture (No Upholstered)\": \"2511\",\r\n\t\"Office Furniture\": \"2520\",\r\n\t\"Office Furniture (No Wood)\": \"2522\",\r\n\t\"Public Bldg & Related Furniture\": \"2531\",\r\n\t\"Partitions Shelvg Lockers & office & Store Fixtures\": \"2540\",\r\n\t\"Miscellaneous Furniture & Fixtures\": \"2590\",\r\n\t\"Papers & Allied Products\": \"2600\",\r\n\t\"Pulp Mills\": \"2611\",\r\n\t\"Paper Mills\": \"2621\",\r\n\t\"Paperboard Mills\": \"2631\",\r\n\t\"Paperboard Containers & Boxes\": \"2650\",\r\n\t\"Converted Paper & Paperboard Prods (No Containers/Boxes)\": \"2670\",\r\n\t\"Plastics Foil & Coated Paper Bags\": \"2673\",\r\n\t\"Newspapers: Publishing or Publishing & Printing\": \"2711\",\r\n\t\"Periodicals: Publishing or Publishing & Printing\": \"2721\",\r\n\t\"Books: Publishing or Publishing & Printing\": \"2731\",\r\n\t\"Book Printing\": \"2732\",\r\n\t\"Miscellaneous Publishing\": \"2741\",\r\n\t\"Commercial Printing\": \"2750\",\r\n\t\"Manifold Business Forms\": \"2761\",\r\n\t\"Greeting Cards\": \"2771\",\r\n\t\"Blankbooks Looseleaf Binders & Bookbinding & Related Work\": \"2780\",\r\n\t\"Service Industries For The Printing Trade\": \"2790\",\r\n\t\"Chemicals & Allied Products\": \"2800\",\r\n\t\"Industrial Inorganic Chemicals\": \"2810\",\r\n\t\"Plastic Material Synth Resin/Rubber Cellulos (No Glass)\": \"2820\",\r\n\t\"Plastic Materials Synth Resins & Nonvulcan Elastomers\": \"2821\",\r\n\t\"Medicinal Chemicals & Botanical Products\": \"2833\",\r\n\t\"Pharmaceutical Preparations\": \"2834\",\r\n\t\"In Vitro & In Vivo Diagnostic Substances\": \"2835\",\r\n\t\"Biological Products (No Diagnostic Substances)\": \"2836\",\r\n\t\"Soap Detergents Cleaning Preparations Perfumes Cosmetics\": \"2840\",\r\n\t\"Specialty Cleaning Polishing and Sanitation Preparations\": \"2842\",\r\n\t\"Perfumes Cosmetics & Other Toilet Preparations\": \"2844\",\r\n\t\"Paints Varnishes Lacquers Enamels & Allied Prods\": \"2851\",\r\n\t\"Industrial Organic Chemicals\": \"2860\",\r\n\t\"Agricultural Chemicals\": \"2870\",\r\n\t\"Miscellaneous Chemical Products\": \"2890\",\r\n\t\"Adhesives & Sealants\": \"2891\",\r\n\t\"Petroleum Refining\": \"2911\",\r\n\t\"Asphalt Paving & Roofing Materials\": \"2950\",\r\n\t\"Miscellaneous Products of Petroleum & Coal\": \"2990\",\r\n\t\"Tires & Inner Tubes\": \"3011\",\r\n\t\"Rubber & Plastics Footwear\": \"3021\",\r\n\t\"Gaskets Packg & Sealg Devices & Rubber & Plastics Hose\": \"3050\",\r\n\t\"Fabricated Rubber Products NEC\": \"3060\",\r\n\t\"Miscellaneous Plastics Products\": \"3080\",\r\n\t\"Unsupported Plastics Film & Sheet\": \"3081\",\r\n\t\"Plastics Foam Products\": \"3086\",\r\n\t\"Plastics Products NEC\": \"3089\",\r\n\t\"Leather & Leather Products\": \"3100\",\r\n\t\"Footwear (No Rubber)\": \"3140\",\r\n\t\"Flat Glass\": \"3211\",\r\n\t\"Glass & Glassware Pressed or Blown\": \"3220\",\r\n\t\"Glass Containers\": \"3221\",\r\n\t\"Glass Products Made of Purchased Glass\": \"3231\",\r\n\t\"Cement Hydraulic\": \"3241\",\r\n\t\"Structural Clay Products\": \"3250\",\r\n\t\"Pottery & Related Products\": \"3260\",\r\n\t\"Concrete Gypsum & Plaster Products\": \"3270\",\r\n\t\"Concrete Products Except Block & Brick\": \"3272\",\r\n\t\"Cut Stone & Stone Products\": \"3281\",\r\n\t\"Abrasive Asbestos & Misc Nonmetallic Mineral Prods\": \"3290\",\r\n\t\"Steel Works Blast Furnaces & Rolling & Finishing Mills\": \"3310\",\r\n\t\"Steel Works Blast Furnaces & Rolling Mills (Coke Ovens)\": \"3312\",\r\n\t\"Steel Pipe & Tubes\": \"3317\",\r\n\t\"Iron & Steel Foundries\": \"3320\",\r\n\t\"Primary Smelting & Refining of Nonferrous Metals\": \"3330\",\r\n\t\"Primary Production of Aluminum\": \"3334\",\r\n\t\"Secondary Smelting & Refining of Nonferrous Metals\": \"3341\",\r\n\t\"Rolling Drawing & Extruding of Nonferrous Metals\": \"3350\",\r\n\t\"Drawing & Insulating of Nonferrous Wire\": \"3357\",\r\n\t\"Nonferrous Foundries (Castings)\": \"3360\",\r\n\t\"Miscellaneous Primary Metal Products\": \"3390\",\r\n\t\"Metal Cans\": \"3411\",\r\n\t\"Metal Shipping Barrels Drums Kegs & Pails\": \"3412\",\r\n\t\"Cutlery Handtools & General Hardware\": \"3420\",\r\n\t\"Heating Equip Except Elec & Warm Air; & Plumbing Fixtures\": \"3430\",\r\n\t\"Heating Equipment Except Electric & Warm Air Furnaces\": \"3433\",\r\n\t\"Fabricated Structural Metal Products\": \"3440\",\r\n\t\"Metal Doors Sash Frames Moldings & Trim\": \"3442\",\r\n\t\"Fabricated Plate Work (Boiler Shops)\": \"3443\",\r\n\t\"Sheet Metal Work\": \"3444\",\r\n\t\"Prefabricated Metal Buildings & Components\": \"3448\",\r\n\t\"Screw Machine Products\": \"3451\",\r\n\t\"Bolts Nuts Screws Rivets & Washers\": \"3452\",\r\n\t\"Metal Forgings & Stampings\": \"3460\",\r\n\t\"Coating Engraving & Allied Services\": \"3470\",\r\n\t\"Ordnance & Accessories (No Vehicles/Guided Missiles)\": \"3480\",\r\n\t\"Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Products\": \"3490\",\r\n\t\"Engines & Turbines\": \"3510\",\r\n\t\"Farm Machinery & Equipment\": \"3523\",\r\n\t\"Lawn & Garden Tractors & Home Lawn & Gardens Equip\": \"3524\",\r\n\t\"Construction Mining & Materials Handling Machinery & Equip\": \"3530\",\r\n\t\"Construction Machinery & Equip\": \"3531\",\r\n\t\"Mining Machinery & Equip (No Oil & Gas Field Mach & Equip)\": \"3532\",\r\n\t\"Oil & Gas Field Machinery & Equipment\": \"3533\",\r\n\t\"Industrial Trucks Tractors Trailers & Stackers\": \"3537\",\r\n\t\"Metalworkg Machinery & Equipment\": \"3540\",\r\n\t\"Machine Tools Metal Cutting Types\": \"3541\",\r\n\t\"Special Industry Machinery (No Metalworking Machinery)\": \"3550\",\r\n\t\"Printing Trades Machinery & Equipment\": \"3555\",\r\n\t\"Special Industry Machinery NEC\": \"3559\",\r\n\t\"General Industrial Machinery & Equipment\": \"3560\",\r\n\t\"Pumps & Pumping Equipment\": \"3561\",\r\n\t\"Ball & Roller Bearings\": \"3562\",\r\n\t\"Industrial & Commercial Fans & Blowers & Air Purifying Equip\": \"3564\",\r\n\t\"Industrial Process Furnaces & Ovens\": \"3567\",\r\n\t\"General Industrial Machinery & Equipment NEC\": \"3569\",\r\n\t\"Computer & office Equipment\": \"3570\",\r\n\t\"Electronic Computers\": \"3571\",\r\n\t\"Computer Storage Devices\": \"3572\",\r\n\t\"Computer Terminals\": \"3575\",\r\n\t\"Computer Communications Equipment\": \"3576\",\r\n\t\"Computer Peripheral Equipment NEC\": \"3577\",\r\n\t\"Calculating & Accounting Machines (No Electronic Computers)\": \"3578\",\r\n\t\"Office Machines NEC\": \"3579\",\r\n\t\"Refrigeration & Service Industry Machinery\": \"3580\",\r\n\t\"Air-Cond & Warm Air Heatg Equip & Comm & Indl Refrig Equip\": \"3585\",\r\n\t\"Misc Industrial & Commercial Machinery & Equipment\": \"3590\",\r\n\t\"Electronic & Other Electrical Equipment (No Computer Equip)\": \"3600\",\r\n\t\"Power Distribution & Specialty Transformers\": \"3612\",\r\n\t\"Switchgear & Switchboard Apparatus\": \"3613\",\r\n\t\"Electrical Industrial Apparatus\": \"3620\",\r\n\t\"Motors & Generators\": \"3621\",\r\n\t\"Household Appliances\": \"3630\",\r\n\t\"Electric Housewares & Fans\": \"3634\",\r\n\t\"Electric Lighting & Wiring Equipment\": \"3640\",\r\n\t\"Household Audio & Video Equipment\": \"3651\",\r\n\t\"Phonograph Records & Prerecorded Audio Tapes & Disks\": \"3652\",\r\n\t\"Telephone & Telegraph Apparatus\": \"3661\",\r\n\t\"Radio & TV Broadcasting & Communications Equipment\": \"3663\",\r\n\t\"Communications Equipment NEC\": \"3669\",\r\n\t\"Electronic Components & Accessories\": \"3670\",\r\n\t\"Printed Circuit Boards\": \"3672\",\r\n\t\"Semiconductors & Related Devices\": \"3674\",\r\n\t\"Electronic Coils Transformers & Other Inductors\": \"3677\",\r\n\t\"Electronic Connectors\": \"3678\",\r\n\t\"Electronic Components NEC\": \"3679\",\r\n\t\"Miscellaneous Electrical Machinery Equipment & Supplies\": \"3690\",\r\n\t\"Magnetic & Optical Recording Media\": \"3695\",\r\n\t\"Motor Vehicles & Passenger Car Bodies\": \"3711\",\r\n\t\"Truck & Bus Bodies\": \"3713\",\r\n\t\"Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories\": \"3714\",\r\n\t\"Truck Trailers\": \"3715\",\r\n\t\"Motor Homes\": \"3716\",\r\n\t\"Aircraft & Parts\": \"3720\",\r\n\t\"Aircraft\": \"3721\",\r\n\t\"Aircraft Engines & Engine Parts\": \"3724\",\r\n\t\"Aircraft Parts & Auxiliary Equipment NEC\": \"3728\",\r\n\t\"Ship & Boat Building & Repairing\": \"3730\",\r\n\t\"Railroad Equipment\": \"3743\",\r\n\t\"Motorcycles Bicycles & Parts\": \"3751\",\r\n\t\"Guided Missiles & Space Vehicles & Parts\": \"3760\",\r\n\t\"Miscellaneous Transportation Equipment\": \"3790\",\r\n\t\"Search Detection Navigation Guidance Aeronautical Sys\": \"3812\",\r\n\t\"Laboratory Apparatus & Furniture\": \"3821\",\r\n\t\"Auto Controls For Regulating Residential & Comml Environments\": \"3822\",\r\n\t\"Industrial Instruments For Measurement Display and Control\": \"3823\",\r\n\t\"Totalizing Fluid Meters & Counting Devices\": \"3824\",\r\n\t\"Instruments For Meas & Testing of Electricity & Elec Signals\": \"3825\",\r\n\t\"Laboratory Analytical Instruments\": \"3826\",\r\n\t\"Optical Instruments & Lenses\": \"3827\",\r\n\t\"Measuring & Controlling Devices NEC\": \"3829\",\r\n\t\"Surgical & Medical Instruments & Apparatus\": \"3841\",\r\n\t\"Orthopedic Prosthetic & Surgical Appliances & Supplies\": \"3842\",\r\n\t\"Dental Equipment & Supplies\": \"3843\",\r\n\t\"X-Ray Apparatus & Tubes & Related Irradiation Apparatus\": \"3844\",\r\n\t\"Electromedical & Electrotherapeutic Apparatus\": \"3845\",\r\n\t\"Ophthalmic Goods\": \"3851\",\r\n\t\"Photographic Equipment & Supplies\": \"3861\",\r\n\t\"Watches Clocks Clockwork Operated Devices/Parts\": \"3873\",\r\n\t\"Jewelry Silverware & Plated Ware\": \"3910\",\r\n\t\"Jewelry Precious Metal\": \"3911\",\r\n\t\"Musical Instruments\": \"3931\",\r\n\t\"Dolls & Stuffed Toys\": \"3942\",\r\n\t\"Games Toys & Children's Vehicles (No Dolls & Bicycles)\": \"3944\",\r\n\t\"Sporting & Athletic Goods NEC\": \"3949\",\r\n\t\"Pens Pencils & Other Artists' Materials\": \"3950\",\r\n\t\"Costume Jewelry & Novelties\": \"3960\",\r\n\t\"Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries\": \"3990\",\r\n\t\"Railroads Line-Haul Operating\": \"4011\",\r\n\t\"Railroad Switching & Terminal Establishments\": \"4013\",\r\n\t\"Local & Suburban Transit & Interurban Hwy Passenger Trans\": \"4100\",\r\n\t\"Trucking & Courier Services (No Air)\": \"4210\",\r\n\t\"Trucking (No Local)\": \"4213\",\r\n\t\"Public Warehousing & Storage\": \"4220\",\r\n\t\"Terminal Maintenance Facilities For Motor Freight Transport\": \"4231\",\r\n\t\"Water Transportation\": \"4400\",\r\n\t\"Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight\": \"4412\",\r\n\t\"Air Transportation Scheduled\": \"4512\",\r\n\t\"Air Courier Services\": \"4513\",\r\n\t\"Air Transportation Nonscheduled\": \"4522\",\r\n\t\"Airports Flying Fields & Airport Terminal Services\": \"4581\",\r\n\t\"Pipe Lines (No Natural Gas)\": \"4610\",\r\n\t\"Transportation Services\": \"4700\",\r\n\t\"Arrangement of Transportation of Freight & Cargo\": \"4731\",\r\n\t\"Radiotelephone Communications\": \"4812\",\r\n\t\"Telephone Communications (No Radiotelephone)\": \"4813\",\r\n\t\"Telegraph & Other Message Communications\": \"4822\",\r\n\t\"Radio Broadcasting Stations\": \"4832\",\r\n\t\"Television Broadcasting Stations\": \"4833\",\r\n\t\"Cable & Other Pay Television Services\": \"4841\",\r\n\t\"Communications Services NEC\": \"4899\",\r\n\t\"Electric Gas & Sanitary Services\": \"4900\",\r\n\t\"Electric Services\": \"4911\",\r\n\t\"Natural Gas Transmission\": \"4922\",\r\n\t\"Natural Gas Transmission & Distribution\": \"4923\",\r\n\t\"Natural Gas Distribution\": \"4924\",\r\n\t\"Electric & Other Services Combined\": \"4931\",\r\n\t\"Gas & Other Services Combined\": \"4932\",\r\n\t\"Water Supply\": \"4941\",\r\n\t\"Sanitary Services\": \"4950\",\r\n\t\"Refuse Systems\": \"4953\",\r\n\t\"Hazardous Waste Management\": \"4955\",\r\n\t\"Steam & Air-Conditioning Supply\": \"4961\",\r\n\t\"Co-generation Services & Small Power Producers\": \"4991\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Durable Goods\": \"5000\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Motor Vehicles & Motor Vehicle Parts & Supplies\": \"5010\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Motor Vehicle Supplies & New Parts\": \"5013\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Furniture & Home Furnishings\": \"5020\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Lumber & Other Construction Materials\": \"5030\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Lumber Plywood millwork & Wood Panels\": \"5031\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Professional & Commercial Equipment & Supplies\": \"5040\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Computers & Peripheral Equipment & Software\": \"5045\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Medical Dental & Hospital Equipment & Supplies\": \"5047\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Metals & Minerals (No Petroleum)\": \"5050\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Metals Service Centers & Offices\": \"5051\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Electrical Apparatus & Equipment Wiring Supplies\": \"5063\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Electrical Appliances TV & Radio Sets\": \"5064\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Electronic Parts & Equipment NEC\": \"5065\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Hardware & Plumbing & Heating Equipment & Supplies\": \"5070\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Hardware\": \"5072\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Machinery Equipment & Supplies\": \"5080\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Construction & Mining (No Petro) Machinery & Equip\": \"5082\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Industrial Machinery & Equipment\": \"5084\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Misc Durable Goods\": \"5090\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Jewelry Watches Precious Stones & Metals\": \"5094\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Durable Goods NEC\": \"5099\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Paper & Paper Products\": \"5110\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Drugs Proprietaries & Druggists' Sundries\": \"5122\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Apparel Piece Goods & Notions\": \"5130\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Groceries & Related Products\": \"5140\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Groceries General Line (merchandise)\": \"5141\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Farm Product Raw Materials\": \"5150\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Chemicals & Allied Products\": \"5160\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Petroleum Bulk Stations & Terminals\": \"5171\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Petroleum & Petroleum Products (No Bulk Stations)\": \"5172\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Beer Wine & Distilled Alcoholic Beverages\": \"5180\",\r\n\t\"Wholesale-Miscellaneous Non-durable Goods\": \"5190\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Building Materials Hardware Garden Supply\": \"5200\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Lumber & Other Building Materials Dealers\": \"5211\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Mobile Home Dealers\": \"5271\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Department Stores\": \"5311\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Variety Stores\": \"5331\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Misc General Merchandise Stores\": \"5399\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Food Stores\": \"5400\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Grocery Stores\": \"5411\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Convenience Stores\": \"5412\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Auto Dealers & Gasoline Stations\": \"5500\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Auto & Home Supply Stores\": \"5531\",\r\n\t\"Boat Dealers\": \"5551\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Apparel & Accessory Stores\": \"5600\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Women's Clothing Stores\": \"5621\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Family Clothing Stores\": \"5651\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Shoe Stores\": \"5661\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Home Furniture Furnishings & Equipment Stores\": \"5700\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Furniture Stores\": \"5712\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Radio TV & Consumer Electronics Stores\": \"5731\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Computer & Computer Software Stores\": \"5734\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Record & Prerecorded Tape Stores\": \"5735\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Eating & Drinking Places\": \"5810\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Eating Places\": \"5812\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Miscellaneous Retail\": \"5900\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Drug Stores and Proprietary Stores\": \"5912\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Miscellaneous Shopping Goods Stores\": \"5940\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Jewelry Stores\": \"5944\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Hobby Toy & Game Shops\": \"5945\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Nonstore Retailers\": \"5960\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Catalog & Mail-Order Houses\": \"5961\",\r\n\t\"Retail-Retail Stores NEC\": \"5990\",\r\n\t\"Pay Day Lenders\": \"6012\",\r\n\t\"National Commercial Banks\": \"6021\",\r\n\t\"State Commercial Banks\": \"6022\",\r\n\t\"Commercial Banks NEC\": \"6029\",\r\n\t\"Savings Institution Federally Chartered\": \"6035\",\r\n\t\"Savings Institutions Not Federally Chartered\": \"6036\",\r\n\t\"Functions Related To Depository Banking NEC\": \"6099\",\r\n\t\"Federal & Federally Sponsored Credit Agencies\": \"6111\",\r\n\t\"Personal Credit Institutions\": \"6141\",\r\n\t\"Short-Term Business Credit Institutions\": \"6153\",\r\n\t\"Miscellaneous Business Credit Institution\": \"6159\",\r\n\t\"Mortgage Bankers & Loan Correspondents\": \"6162\",\r\n\t\"Loan Brokers\": \"6163\",\r\n\t\"Finance Lessors\": \"6172\",\r\n\t\"Asset-Backed Securities\": \"6189\",\r\n\t\"Finance Services\": \"6199\",\r\n\t\"Security & Commodity Brokers Dealers Exchanges & Services\": \"6200\",\r\n\t\"Security Brokers Dealers & Flotation Companies\": \"6211\",\r\n\t\"Commodity Contracts Brokers & Dealers\": \"6221\",\r\n\t\"Investment Advice\": \"6282\",\r\n\t\"Life Insurance\": \"6311\",\r\n\t\"Accident & Health Insurance\": \"6321\",\r\n\t\"Hospital & Medical Service Plans\": \"6324\",\r\n\t\"Fire Marine & Casualty Insurance\": \"6331\",\r\n\t\"Surety Insurance\": \"6351\",\r\n\t\"Title Insurance\": \"6361\",\r\n\t\"Insurance Carriers NEC\": \"6399\",\r\n\t\"Insurance Agents Brokers & Service\": \"6411\",\r\n\t\"Real Estate\": \"6500\",\r\n\t\"Real Estate Operators (No Developers) & Lessors\": \"6510\",\r\n\t\"Operators of Nonresidential Buildings\": \"6512\",\r\n\t\"Operators of Apartment Buildings\": \"6513\",\r\n\t\"Lessors of Real Property NEC\": \"6519\",\r\n\t\"Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others)\": \"6531\",\r\n\t\"Real Estate Dealers (For Their Own Account)\": \"6532\",\r\n\t\"Land Subdividers & Developers (No Cemeteries)\": \"6552\",\r\n\t\"Blank Checks\": \"6770\",\r\n\t\"Oil Royalty Traders\": \"6792\",\r\n\t\"Patent Owners & Lessors\": \"6794\",\r\n\t\"Mineral Royalty Traders\": \"6795\",\r\n\t\"Real Estate Investment Trusts\": \"6798\",\r\n\t\"Investors NEC\": \"6799\",\r\n\t\"Hotels Rooming Houses Camps & Other Lodging Places\": \"7000\",\r\n\t\"Hotels & Motels\": \"7011\",\r\n\t\"Services-Personal Services\": \"7200\",\r\n\t\"Services-Advertising\": \"7310\",\r\n\t\"Services-Advertising Agencies\": \"7311\",\r\n\t\"Services-Consumer Credit Reporting Collection Agencies\": \"7320\",\r\n\t\"Services-Mailing Reproduction Commercial Art & Photography\": \"7330\",\r\n\t\"Services-Direct Mail Advertising Services\": \"7331\",\r\n\t\"Services-Photocopying and Duplicating Services\": \"7334\",\r\n\t\"Services-To Dwellings & Other Buildings\": \"7340\",\r\n\t\"Services-Miscellaneous Equipment Rental & Leasing\": \"7350\",\r\n\t\"Services-Equipment Rental & Leasing NEC\": \"7359\",\r\n\t\"Services-Employment Agencies\": \"7361\",\r\n\t\"Services-Help Supply Services\": \"7363\",\r\n\t\"Services-Computer Programming Data Processing Etc.\": \"7370\",\r\n\t\"Services-Computer Programming Services\": \"7371\",\r\n\t\"Services-Prepackaged Software\": \"7372\",\r\n\t\"Services-Computer Integrated Systems Design\": \"7373\",\r\n\t\"Services-Computer Processing & Data Preparation\": \"7374\",\r\n\t\"Services-Computer Rental & Leasing\": \"7377\",\r\n\t\"Services-Miscellaneous Business Services\": \"7380\",\r\n\t\"Services-Detective Guard & Armored Car Services\": \"7381\",\r\n\t\"Services-Photofinishing Laboratories\": \"7384\",\r\n\t\"Services-Telephone Interconnect Systems\": \"7385\",\r\n\t\"Services-Business Services NEC\": \"7389\",\r\n\t\"Services-Automotive Repair Services & Parking\": \"7500\",\r\n\t\"Services-Auto Rental & Leasing (No Drivers)\": \"7510\",\r\n\t\"Services-Miscellaneous Repair Services\": \"7600\",\r\n\t\"Services-Motion Picture & Video Tape Production\": \"7812\",\r\n\t\"Services-Allied To Motion Picture Production\": \"7819\",\r\n\t\"Services-Motion Picture & Video Tape Distribution\": \"7822\",\r\n\t\"Services-Allied To Motion Picture Distribution\": \"7829\",\r\n\t\"Services-Motion Picture Theaters\": \"7830\",\r\n\t\"Services-Video Tape Rental\": \"7841\",\r\n\t\"Services-Amusement & Recreation Services\": \"7900\",\r\n\t\"Services-Racing Including Track Operation\": \"7948\",\r\n\t\"Services-Miscellaneous Amusement & Recreation\": \"7990\",\r\n\t\"Services-Video Game Arcades\": \"7994\",\r\n\t\"Services-Gambling Transactions\": \"7995\",\r\n\t\"Services-Amusement Parks\": \"7996\",\r\n\t\"Services-Membership Sports & Recreation Clubs\": \"7997\",\r\n\t\"Services-Health Services\": \"8000\",\r\n\t\"Services-Offices & Clinics of Doctors of Medicine\": \"8011\",\r\n\t\"Services-Nursing & Personal Care Facilities\": \"8050\",\r\n\t\"Services-Skilled Nursing Care Facilities\": \"8051\",\r\n\t\"Services-Hospitals\": \"8060\",\r\n\t\"Services-General Medical & Surgical Hospitals NEC\": \"8062\",\r\n\t\"Services-Medical Laboratories\": \"8071\",\r\n\t\"Services-Home Health Care Services\": \"8082\",\r\n\t\"Services-Misc Health & Allied Services NEC\": \"8090\",\r\n\t\"Services-Specialty Outpatient Facilities NEC\": \"8093\",\r\n\t\"Services-Legal Services\": \"8111\",\r\n\t\"Services-Educational Services\": \"8200\",\r\n\t\"Services-Social Services\": \"8300\",\r\n\t\"Services-Child Day Care Services\": \"8351\",\r\n\t\"Services-Membership organizations\": \"8600\",\r\n\t\"Services-Engineering Accounting Research Management\": \"8700\",\r\n\t\"Services-Engineering Services\": \"8711\",\r\n\t\"Services-Commercial Physical & Biological Research\": \"8731\",\r\n\t\"Services-Testing Laboratories\": \"8734\",\r\n\t\"Services-Management Services\": \"8741\",\r\n\t\"Services-Management Consulting Services\": \"8742\",\r\n\t\"Services-Facilities Support Management Services\": \"8744\",\r\n\t\"Business Consulting Services Not Elsewhere Classified\": \"8748\",\r\n\t\"American Depositary Receipts\": \"8880\",\r\n\t\"Foreign Governments\": \"8888\",\r\n\t\"Services-Services NEC\": \"8900\",\r\n\t\"International Affairs\": \"9721\",\r\n\t\"Non-Operating Establishments\": \"9995\"\r\n}",
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6082,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6082,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Standard_Industrial_Classification_Division.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Standard_Industrial_Classification_Code+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7825123,
      "name": "Commons+Standard Industrial Classification Division",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Standard_Industrial_Classification_Division.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Standard Industrial Classification Division",
      "question": "What is the company's Industry Division based on the Standard Industrial Classification system?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": "{ \r\n  \"Agriculture / Forestry / Fishing\" : \"A\",\r\n  \"Mining\" : \"B\",\r\n  \"Construction\" : \"C\",\r\n  \"Manufacturing\" : \"D\",\r\n  \"Transportation / Communications / Electric / Gas / Sanitary service\" : \"E\",\r\n  \"Wholesale Trade\" : \"F\",\r\n  \"Retail Trade\" : \"G\",\r\n  \"Finance / Insurance / Real Estate\" : \"H\",\r\n  \"Services\" : \"I\",\r\n  \"Public Administration\" : \"J\"\r\n}",
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var ceilings, toDivision;\n\n  ceilings = {\n    A: 1000,\n    B: 1500,\n    C: 1800,\n    D: 4000,\n    E: 5000,\n    F: 5200,\n    G: 6000,\n    H: 6800,\n    I: 9000,\n    J: 9730\n  };\n\n  toDivision = function(code) {\n    var ceiling, division;\n    for (division in ceilings) {\n      ceiling = ceilings[division];\n      if (code < ceiling) {\n        return division;\n      }\n    }\n    return \"Unknown\";\n  };\n\n  sicCodes.map(toDivision);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "sicCodes",
          "metric": "~7761172"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 6080,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6080,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Industry.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Company_Category.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Standard_Industrial_Classification_Division+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7826286,
      "name": "Commons+Company Category",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Company_Category.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Company Category",
      "question": "Which category or categories apply to this company?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>It seems like such a simple question; what industry or sector does a company belong to? While the question might be simple, the answer hardly is.</p>\r\n<p>Depending on the your perspective a company like  [[https://wikirate.org/Zalando_SE|Zalando SE]] might be an apparel company (it sells apparel products), a tech company (it is an online market place), a financial services company (it is a holding of other companies), or all of the above.</p>\r\n<p>As a result methodology designers often apply the industry or sector that makes most sense for their assessment. Pragmatic and understandable of course, but where does that leave us in terms of comparability across datasets?</p>\r\n<p>[[https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/ISIC.cshtml|ISIC]] has defined an international classification of productive activities which lots of nations have adopted to classify their companies and to which lots of different classifications and taxonomies have been mapped - the largest effort to date to harmonize the different systems and approaches out there.</p>\r\n<p>Wikirate sources these ISIC codes from the [[https://opencorporates.com/|OpenCorporates]] registry. However, not all companies on Wikirate have been assigned ISIC code (as of September 2021 not even 5%).</p>\r\n<p>That is where this metric comes in; an attempt to classify all companies on Wikirate by building on the ISIC and other widely used categorizations. As much as possible the data is sourced from other categorization schemes (see formula below), which is then manually supplemented through other research efforts.</p>\r\n<p>This categorization is adapted slightly from ISIC Division categories to a somewhat more simplified number of categories that mostly show what place in the value chain companies find themselves in.</p>\r\n<p>Possible categories include:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Financial</strong></li>\r\n<li><strong>Wholesale and retail</strong></li>\r\n<li><strong>Raw material producer</strong> (including agriculture, forestry, fishing, mining, and quarrying)</li>\r\n<li><strong>Infrastructure</strong> (including energy supply, water and waste management, construction, transportation and storage, real estate)</li>\r\n<li><strong>Health and education</strong></li>\r\n<li><strong>Science and technology</strong> (including information and communication, professional, scientific and technical)</li>\r\n<li><strong>Other </strong>(including accommodation and food services, adminstrative and support services, public administration and defense, and arts, entertainment, and recreation)</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>This should be considered a work in progress and a first step in developing a more robust system on Wikirate to organizing companies in industry and sector groups.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\">Note:</span> Across prominent data pages on the Wikirate platform, you will find a Company Category filter. This will help you quickly narrow down the list of companies that you might be interested in.</p>\r\n<p>Want this metric to be even more prominent? If you bookmark it, it will show up in your quick filters on the different pages.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": "{\r\n  \"Financial\": \"F\",\r\n  \"Health and education\": \"H\",\r\n  \"Infrastructure\": \"I\",\r\n  \"Manufacturing\": \"M\",\r\n  \"Raw material producer\": \"R\",\r\n  \"Science and technology\": \"S\",\r\n  \"Wholesale and retail\": \"W\",\r\n  \"Other\": \"O\"\r\n}",
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var actMap, isicMap, mappedCodes, sicMap;\n\n  isicMap = {\n    A: \"R\",\n    B: \"R\",\n    C: \"M\",\n    D: \"I\",\n    E: \"I\",\n    F: \"I\",\n    G: \"W\",\n    H: \"I\",\n    I: \"O\",\n    J: \"S\",\n    K: \"F\",\n    L: \"I\",\n    M: \"S\",\n    N: \"O\",\n    O: \"O\",\n    P: \"H\",\n    Q: \"H\",\n    R: \"O\",\n    S: \"O\",\n    T: \"O\",\n    U: \"O\"\n  };\n\n  sicMap = {\n    E: \"I\",\n    I: \"O\"\n  };\n\n  actMap = {\n    \"Infrastructure\": \"I\",\n    \"Hospitality & Recreation\": \"O\",\n    \"Services\": \"O\"\n  };\n\n  mappedCodes = function(answer, answerMap) {\n    var codes;\n    if (!isKnown(answer)) {\n      return;\n    }\n    codes = answer.map(function(a) {\n      return answerMap[a];\n    });\n    codes = codes.filter(Boolean);\n    if (codes.length) {\n      return codes;\n    }\n  };\n\n  mappedCodes(isic, isicMap) || mappedCodes(sic, sicMap) || mappedCodes(act, actMap) || \"Unknown\";\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "isic",
          "metric": "~3767733",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "sic",
          "metric": "~7825123",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "act",
          "metric": "~6248523",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 82099,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 82099,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Company_Category+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7840773,
      "name": "Core+Company Ownership",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Company_Ownership.json",
      "designer": "Core",
      "title": "Company Ownership",
      "question": "What type of company ownership structure does the organization have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Public",
        "Private",
        "State-owned",
        "State-controlled"
      ],
      "report_type": "Research Document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Core+Company_Ownership+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7868421,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Supply Chain Audits (Step 4)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Supply_Chain_Audits_Step_4.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Supply Chain Audits (Step 4)",
      "question": "Does the (mid- or up-stream) company audit its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 282,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 176,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Supply_Chain_Audits_Step_4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7887776,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress to Eliminate Hazardous Chemicals+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_to_Eliminate_Hazardous_Chemicals+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress to Eliminate Hazardous Chemicals",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_to_Eliminate_Hazardous_Chemicals+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7887780,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Commitment to Eliminate Hazardous Chemicals+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Commitment_to_Eliminate_Hazardous_Chemicals+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Commitment to Eliminate Hazardous Chemicals",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Commitment_to_Eliminate_Hazardous_Chemicals+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7891998,
      "name": "C-MORE+Sustainability Report",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Sustainability_Report.json",
      "designer": "C-MORE",
      "title": "Sustainability Report",
      "question": "Does the organisation have a sustainability report?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Verified sustainability reporting assures the quality and credibility of the information.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes an annual sustainability or corporate social responsibility report that is audited or verified by an independent third party. Start by looking for an annual sustainability or corporate social responsibility report (could also be found within annual company report) that is audited or verified by an independent third party (e.g. as required by French law)

</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Where to look for this information:
</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Corporate Social Responsibility report
</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Company documents
</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Company policies
</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Company websites</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">
- Company code of conduct
</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)
</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">-</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">
- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)
</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">

Good keywords for your searches include:
</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Audit</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">
- Verified</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">
- Independent</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">
- Third party
</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Sustainability report
</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- CSR report

</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Things to watch out for:
</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">- Reports published after January 18
</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">-</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> Must state clearly that the sustainability information is audited and not just the financial data within the report, or if unclear then we cannot count</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No, not aware",
        "Not known",
        "No, but in development",
        "No, but aware",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Sustainability_Report+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7892071,
      "name": "C-MORE+Social / Human Rights Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Social_Human_Rights_Policy.json",
      "designer": "C-MORE",
      "title": "Social / Human Rights Policy",
      "question": "Does the organisation have a social / human rights / modern slavery policy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Social sustainability policy",
        "Human rights policy",
        "Modern slavery policy",
        "Social sustainability policy for suppliers / supplier code",
        "Human rights policy for suppliers / supplier code",
        "A modern slavery policy for suppliers / supplier code",
        "Ethics code",
        "Diversity Equity Inclusion+Belonging policy",
        "Diversity Equity Inclusion+Belonging policy for suppliers",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Social_Human_Rights_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7892132,
      "name": "C-MORE+Environmental policies",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Environmental_policies.json",
      "designer": "C-MORE",
      "title": "Environmental policies",
      "question": "Does the organisation have an environmental policy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "General environmental policy",
        "General environmental policy for suppliers",
        "Water and air pollution",
        "Chemical and oil spills",
        "Smog",
        "Drinking water quality",
        "Land conservation and management",
        "Wildlife protection",
        "Animal cruelty",
        "Waste",
        "Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Environmental_policies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7892143,
      "name": "C-MORE+Governance of social issues / human rights / modern slavery",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Governance_of_social_issues_human_rights_modern_slavery.json",
      "designer": "C-MORE",
      "title": "Governance of social issues / human rights / modern slavery",
      "question": "Does the organisation have a governance structure or body responsible for social issues / human rights / modern slavery? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Board of Directors",
        "Committee",
        "Dedicated team",
        "Focal point",
        "Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Governance_of_social_issues_human_rights_modern_slavery+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7892153,
      "name": "C-MORE+Governance of environmental issues",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Governance_of_environmental_issues.json",
      "designer": "C-MORE",
      "title": "Governance of environmental issues",
      "question": "Does the organisation have a governance structure or body responsible for environmental issues? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Board of Directors",
        "Committee",
        "Dedicated team",
        "Focal point",
        "Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Governance_of_environmental_issues+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7892166,
      "name": "C-MORE+Risk assessment of social issues",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Risk_assessment_of_social_issues.json",
      "designer": "C-MORE",
      "title": "Risk assessment of social issues",
      "question": "Does the organisation conduct risk assessment of social issues / human rights / modern slavery?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Supplier questionnaires",
        "Risk assessment tools or software",
        "Desk review / consulting indexes and reporting frameworks",
        "Audits",
        "On-site visits",
        "Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Risk_assessment_of_social_issues+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7892176,
      "name": "C-MORE+Risk assessment of environmental issues",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Risk_assessment_of_environmental_issues.json",
      "designer": "C-MORE",
      "title": "Risk assessment of environmental issues",
      "question": "Does the organisation conduct risk assessment of environmental issues?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Supplier questionnaire",
        "Risk assessment tools or software",
        "Desk review / consulting indexes and other reporting frameworkers",
        "Audits",
        "On-site visits",
        "Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Risk_assessment_of_environmental_issues+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7892187,
      "name": "C-MORE+Identification of social risks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Identification_of_social_risks.json",
      "designer": "C-MORE",
      "title": "Identification of social risks",
      "question": "Does the organisation identify any social / human rights / modern slavery risks or incidents?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>Please select all that apply: types of risks / incidents and vulnerable groups identified.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Location: Direct operations",
        "Location: Supplier(s) tier 1",
        "Location: Supplier(s) beyond tier 1",
        "Type of risk: Social risks / incidents",
        "Type of risk: Human rights",
        "Type of risk: Modern slavery",
        "Type of risk: Child labour",
        "Type of risk: Sector or type of work",
        "Type of risk: Other",
        "Vulnerable group: Migrant workers",
        "Vulnerable group: Ethnic minority",
        "Vulnerable group: Women",
        "Vulnerable group: Children / youth",
        "Vulnerable group: Local communities",
        "Vulnerable group: Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Identification_of_social_risks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7892199,
      "name": "C-MORE+Identification of environmental risks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Identification_of_environmental_risks.json",
      "designer": "C-MORE",
      "title": "Identification of environmental risks",
      "question": "Does the organisation identify any environmental risks or incidents?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>Please select all that apply.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Where it reads risk, it should also be considered incident.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Location: Direct operations",
        "Location: Supplier(s) tier 1",
        "Location: Supplier(s) beyond tier 1",
        "Type of risk: lack of energy efficiency",
        "Type of risk: chemical pollution",
        "Type of risk: carbon emissions",
        "Type of risk: climate change",
        "Type of risk: disease-causing microbes",
        "Type of risk: lack of access to health care",
        "Type of risk: poor infrastructure and poor water quality.",
        "Type of risk: poor water quality",
        "Type of risk: deflorestation",
        "Type of risk: reducing biodiversity",
        "Type of risk: poor waste management",
        "Type of risk: animal cruelty",
        "Type of risk: other",
        "Vulnerable group: local community",
        "Vulnerable group: animals",
        "Vulnerable group: ethnic minority",
        "Vulnerable group: migrant workers",
        "Vulnerable group: women",
        "Vulnerable group: children",
        "Vulnerable group: other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Identification_of_environmental_risks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7892211,
      "name": "C-MORE+Remediation of environmental issues",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Remediation_of_environmental_issues.json",
      "designer": "C-MORE",
      "title": "Remediation of environmental issues",
      "question": "Does the organisation have remediation procedures in place to address environmental issues?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Worker remediation",
        "Cancel supplier / partner contract",
        "Report to senior management",
        "Corrective action plan",
        "Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Remediation_of_environmental_issues+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7892222,
      "name": "C-MORE+Remediation of social issues",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Remediation_of_social_issues.json",
      "designer": "C-MORE",
      "title": "Remediation of social issues",
      "question": "Does the organisation have remediation procedures in place to address social / human rights / modern slavery issues?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Worker remediation",
        "Cancel supplier / partner contract",
        "Report to senior management",
        "Corrective action plan",
        "Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Remediation_of_social_issues+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7892237,
      "name": "C-MORE+Training on social issues",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Training_on_social_issues.json",
      "designer": "C-MORE",
      "title": "Training on social issues",
      "question": "Does the organisation provide training on social issues / human rights / modern slavery?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Board of Directors",
        "Senior management",
        "Procurement / purchasing department",
        "Human Resources",
        "All employees",
        "New starters",
        "Suppliers",
        "Partners",
        "Community Impact",
        "Unspecified",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Training_on_social_issues+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7892248,
      "name": "C-MORE+Training on environmental issues",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Training_on_environmental_issues.json",
      "designer": "C-MORE",
      "title": "Training on environmental issues",
      "question": "Does the organisation provide training on environmental issues?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Board of Directors",
        "Senior management",
        "Procurement / purchasing department",
        "Human Resources",
        "All employees",
        "New starters",
        "Suppliers",
        "Partners",
        "Community Impact",
        "Unspecified",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Education Initiatives",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Training_on_environmental_issues+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7892259,
      "name": "C-MORE+Environmental issues KPIs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Environmental_issues_KPIs.json",
      "designer": "C-MORE",
      "title": "Environmental issues KPIs",
      "question": "Does the organisation have any Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to monitor efforts / actions to identify, remediate and/or prevent environmental issues?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Environmental_issues_KPIs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7892270,
      "name": "C-MORE+Social issues KPIs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Social_issues_KPIs.json",
      "designer": "C-MORE",
      "title": "Social issues KPIs",
      "question": "Does the organisation have any Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to monitor efforts / actions to identify, remediate and/or prevent social / human rights / modern slavery issues?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/C_MORE+Social_issues_KPIs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910137,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Annual leave and public holidays policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Annual_leave_and_public_holidays_policy.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Annual leave and public holidays policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on annual leave and public holidays for their own operations and/or supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - own operations",
        "Yes - supply chain",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var policy_value, vals;\n\n  policy_value = \"Annual Leave & Public Holidays\";\n\n  vals = [];\n\n  if (m1.includes(policy_value)) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - own operations\");\n  }\n\n  if (m2.includes(policy_value)) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - supply chain\");\n  }\n\n  if (vals.length) {\n    vals;\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821698"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5821708"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Annual_leave_and_public_holidays_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910147,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Contracts and terms of employment policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Contracts_and_terms_of_employment_policy.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Contracts and terms of employment policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on contracts and terms of employment for their own operations and/or supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - own operations",
        "Yes - supply chain",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var policy_value, vals;\n\n  policy_value = \"Contracts & Terms of Employment\";\n\n  vals = [];\n\n  if (m1.includes(policy_value)) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - own operations\");\n  }\n\n  if (m2.includes(policy_value)) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - supply chain\");\n  }\n\n  if (vals.length) {\n    vals;\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821698"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5821708"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Contracts_and_terms_of_employment_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910157,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Maternity rights and parental leave policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Maternity_rights_and_parental_leave_policy.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Maternity rights and parental leave policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on maternity rights and parental leave for their own operations and/or supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - own operations",
        "Yes - supply chain",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var policy_value, vals;\n\n  policy_value = \"Maternity Rights & Parental Leave\";\n\n  vals = [];\n\n  if (m1.includes(policy_value)) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - own operations\");\n  }\n\n  if (m2.includes(policy_value)) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - supply chain\");\n  }\n\n  if (vals.length) {\n    vals;\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821698"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5821708"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Maternity_rights_and_parental_leave_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910167,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Notice period and dismissal policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Notice_period_and_dismissal_policy.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Notice period and dismissal policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on notice period, dismissal and disciplinary action for their own operations and/or supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - own operations",
        "Yes - supply chain",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var policy_value, vals;\n\n  policy_value = \"Notice Period Dismissal & Disciplinary Action\";\n\n  vals = [];\n\n  if (m1.includes(policy_value)) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - own operations\");\n  }\n\n  if (m2.includes(policy_value)) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - supply chain\");\n  }\n\n  if (vals.length) {\n    vals;\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821698"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5821708"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Notice_period_and_dismissal_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910177,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Wages and financial benefits policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Wages_and_financial_benefits_policy.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Wages and financial benefits policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on wages and financial benefits for their own operations and/or supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - own operations",
        "Yes - supply chain",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var policy_value, vals;\n\n  policy_value = \"Wages & Financial Benefits (e.g. bonuses/insurance/social security/pensions)\";\n\n  vals = [];\n\n  if (m1.includes(policy_value)) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - own operations\");\n  }\n\n  if (m2.includes(policy_value)) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - supply chain\");\n  }\n\n  if (vals.length) {\n    vals;\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821698"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5821708"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Wages_and_financial_benefits_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910187,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Discrimination policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Discrimination_policy.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Discrimination policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on discrimination for their own operations and/or supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - own operations",
        "Yes - supply chain",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var vals;\n\n  vals = [];\n\n  if (m1.includes(\"Discrimination\")) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - own operations\");\n  }\n\n  if (m2.includes(\"Discrimination\")) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - supply chain\");\n  }\n\n  if (vals.length) {\n    vals;\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821698"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5821708"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Discrimination_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910197,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Diversity and inclusion policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Diversity_and_inclusion_policy.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Diversity and inclusion policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on diversity & inclusion for their own operations and/or supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - own operations",
        "Yes - supply chain",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var vals;\n\n  vals = [];\n\n  if (m1.includes(\"Diversity & Inclusion\")) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - own operations\");\n  }\n\n  if (m2.includes(\"Diversity & Inclusion\")) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - supply chain\");\n  }\n\n  if (vals.length) {\n    vals;\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821698"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5821708"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Diversity_and_inclusion_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910207,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Harassment and violence policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Harassment_and_violence_policy.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Harassment and violence policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on harassment & violence for their own operations and/or supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - own operations",
        "Yes - supply chain",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var vals;\n\n  vals = [];\n\n  if (m1.includes(\"Harassment & Violence\")) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - own operations\");\n  }\n\n  if (m2.includes(\"Harassment & Violence\")) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - supply chain\");\n  }\n\n  if (vals.length) {\n    vals;\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821698"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5821708"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Harassment_and_violence_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910217,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Health and safety policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Health_and_safety_policy.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Health and safety policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on health & safety for their own operations and/or supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<div>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>\r\n</div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - own operations",
        "Yes - supply chain"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var vals;\n\n  vals = [];\n\n  if (m1.includes(\"Health & Safety\")) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - own operations\");\n  }\n\n  if (m2.includes(\"Health & Safety\")) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - supply chain\");\n  }\n\n  if (vals.length) {\n    vals;\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821698"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5821708"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Health_and_safety_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910227,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Working hours and rest breaks policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Working_hours_and_rest_breaks_policy.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Working hours and rest breaks policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on working hours & rest breaks for their own operations and/or supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<div>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>\r\n</div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - own operations",
        "Yes - supply chain",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var vals;\n\n  vals = [];\n\n  if (m1.includes(\"Working Hours & Rest Breaks\")) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - own operations\");\n  }\n\n  if (m2.includes(\"Working Hours & Rest Breaks\")) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - supply chain\");\n  }\n\n  if (vals.length) {\n    vals;\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821698",
          "not_researched": "NR"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5821708",
          "not_researched": "NR"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Working_hours_and_rest_breaks_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910237,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Anti-corruption, bribery and presentation of false information policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Anti_corruption_bribery_and_presentation_of_false_information_policy.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Anti-corruption, bribery and presentation of false information policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on anti-corruption, bribery and presentation of false information for their own operations and/or supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<div>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>\r\n</div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - own operations",
        "Yes - supply chain",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var answers;\n\n  answers = [];\n\n  if (m1.includes(\"Anti-bribery Corruption & Presentation of False Information\")) {\n    answers.push(\"Yes - own operations\");\n  }\n\n  if (m2.includes(\"Anti-bribery Corruption & Presentation of False Information\")) {\n    answers.push(\"Yes - supply chain\");\n  }\n\n  if (answers.length) {\n    answers;\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821698",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5821708",
          "not_researched": "Unknown"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Anti_Corruption_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Anti_corruption_bribery_and_presentation_of_false_information_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910247,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Waste and recycling policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_and_recycling_policy.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Waste and recycling policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on waste & recycling for their own operations and/or supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </div>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - own operations",
        "Yes - supply chain",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var policies, vals;\n\n  policies = [\"Waste & Recycling (Packaging/Office/Facility/Retail)\", \"Waste & Recycling (Product/Textiles)\"];\n\n  vals = [];\n\n  if (policies.filter(function(p) {\n    return m1.includes(p);\n  }).length) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - own operations\");\n  }\n\n  if (policies.filter(function(p) {\n    return m2.includes(p);\n  }).length) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - supply chain\");\n  }\n\n  if (vals.length) {\n    vals;\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821698"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5821708"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_and_recycling_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910257,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Water usage policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_usage_policy.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Water usage policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on water usage for their own operations and/or supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - own operations",
        "Yes - supply chain",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var policy_value, vals;\n\n  policy_value = \"Water Usage & Footprint\";\n\n  vals = [];\n\n  if (m1.includes(policy_value)) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - own operations\");\n  }\n\n  if (m2.includes(policy_value)) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - supply chain\");\n  }\n\n  if (vals.length) {\n    vals;\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821698"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5821708"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_usage_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910267,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Water effluents policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_effluents_policy.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Water effluents policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on water effluents for their own operations and/or supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - own operations",
        "Yes - supply chain"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var policy_value, vals;\n\n  policy_value = \"Water Effluents & Treatment\";\n\n  vals = [];\n\n  if (m1.includes(policy_value)) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - own operations\");\n  }\n\n  if (m2.includes(policy_value)) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - supply chain\");\n  }\n\n  if (vals.length) {\n    vals;\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821698"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5821708"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_effluents_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910277,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Energy and carbon emissions policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Energy_and_carbon_emissions_policy.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Energy and carbon emissions policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on energy & carbon emissions for their own operations and/or supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - own operations",
        "Yes - supply chain",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var policy_value, vals;\n\n  policy_value = \"Energy & Carbon Emissions\";\n\n  vals = [];\n\n  if (m1.includes(policy_value)) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - own operations\");\n  }\n\n  if (m2.includes(policy_value)) {\n    vals.push(\"Yes - supply chain\");\n  }\n\n  if (vals.length) {\n    vals;\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821708"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5821698"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Emissions_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Energy_and_carbon_emissions_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910287,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Child labour policy (supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Child_labour_policy_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Child labour policy (supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on child labour for their supply chain operations?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Child Labour\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821708"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Child_labour_policy_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910297,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Forced and bonded labour policy (supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Forced_and_bonded_labour_policy_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Forced and bonded labour policy (supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on forced & bonded labour for their supply chain operations?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Forced & Bonded Labour\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821708"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Forced_and_bonded_labour_policy_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910307,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Foreign and migrant labour policy (supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Foreign_and_migrant_labour_policy_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Foreign and migrant labour policy (supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on foreign & migrant labour for their supply chain operations?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Foreign & Migrant Labour\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821708"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Foreign_and_migrant_labour_policy_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910332,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Energy and carbon emissions policy reflected in management procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Energy_and_carbon_emissions_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Energy and carbon emissions policy reflected in management procedures",
      "question": "Is the company's energy & carbon emissions policy reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Energy & Carbon Emissions\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821748"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Emissions_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Energy_and_carbon_emissions_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910342,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Water usage policy reflected in management procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_usage_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Water usage policy reflected in management procedures",
      "question": "Is the company's water usage policy reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Water Usage & Footprint\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821748"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_usage_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910352,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Water effluents policy reflected in management procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_effluents_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Water effluents policy reflected in management procedures",
      "question": "Is the company's water effluents policy reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Water Effluents & Treatment\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821748"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Water_effluents_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910362,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Waste and recycling policy reflected in management procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_and_recycling_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Waste and recycling policy reflected in management procedures",
      "question": "Is the company's waste & recycling policy reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var policies;\n\n  policies = [\"Waste & Recycling (Packaging/Office/Facility/Retail)\", \"Waste & Recycling (Product/Textiles)\"];\n\n  if (policies.filter(function(p) {\n    return m1.includes(p);\n  }).length) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821748"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Waste_and_recycling_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910372,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Annual leave and public holidays policy reflected in management procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Annual_leave_and_public_holidays_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Annual leave and public holidays policy reflected in management procedures",
      "question": "Is the company's annual leave and public holidays policy reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Annual Leave & Public Holidays\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821748"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Annual_leave_and_public_holidays_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910382,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Contracts and terms of employment policy reflected in management procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Contracts_and_terms_of_employment_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Contracts and terms of employment policy reflected in management procedures",
      "question": "Is the company's contracts and terms of employment policy reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Contracts & Terms of Employment\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821748"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Contracts_and_terms_of_employment_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910392,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Maternity rights and parental leave policy reflected in management procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Maternity_rights_and_parental_leave_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Maternity rights and parental leave policy reflected in management procedures",
      "question": "Is the company's maternity rights and parental leave policy reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Maternity Rights & Parental Leave\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821748"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Maternity_rights_and_parental_leave_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910402,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Notice period and dismissal policy reflected in management procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Notice_period_and_dismissal_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Notice period and dismissal policy reflected in management procedures",
      "question": "Is the company's notice periods and dismissal policy reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Notice Period Dismissal & Disciplinary Action\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821748"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Notice_period_and_dismissal_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910412,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Wages and financial benefits policy reflected in management procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Wages_and_financial_benefits_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Wages and financial benefits policy reflected in management procedures",
      "question": "Is the company's wages and financial benefits policy reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Wages & Financial Benefits (e.g. bonuses/insurance/social security/pensions)\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821748"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Wages_and_financial_benefits_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910422,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Discrimination policy reflected in management procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Discrimination_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Discrimination policy reflected in management procedures",
      "question": "Is the company's discrimination policy reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Discrimination\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821748"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Discrimination_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910432,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Diversity and inclusion policy reflected in management procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Diversity_and_inclusion_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Diversity and inclusion policy reflected in management procedures",
      "question": "Is the company's diversity & inclusion policy reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Diversity & Inclusion\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821748"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Diversity_and_inclusion_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910442,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Harassment and violence policy reflected in management procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Harassment_and_violence_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Harassment and violence policy reflected in management procedures",
      "question": "Is the company's harassment and violence leave policy reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Harassment & Violence\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821748"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Harassment_and_violence_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910452,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Health and safety policy reflected in management procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Health_and_safety_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Health and safety policy reflected in management procedures",
      "question": "Is the company's health & safety policy reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Health & Safety\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821748"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Health_and_safety_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910462,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Working hours and rest breaks policy reflected in management procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Working_hours_and_rest_breaks_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Working hours and rest breaks policy reflected in management procedures",
      "question": "Is the company's working hours & rest breaks policy reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Working Hours & Rest Breaks\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821748"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Working_hours_and_rest_breaks_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910472,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Child labour policy reflected in management procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Child_labour_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Child labour policy reflected in management procedures",
      "question": "Is the company's child labour policy reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Child Labour\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821748"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Child_labour_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910492,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Forced and bonded labour policy reflected in management procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Forced_and_bonded_labour_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Forced and bonded labour policy reflected in management procedures",
      "question": "Is the company's forced & bonded labour policy reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Forced & Bonded Labour\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821748"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1073,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 341,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Forced_and_bonded_labour_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910513,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Foreign and migrant labour policy reflected in management procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Foreign_and_migrant_labour_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Foreign and migrant labour policy reflected in management procedures",
      "question": "Is the company's foreign & migrant labour policy reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Foreign & Migrant Labour\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821748"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 251,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 67,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Foreign_and_migrant_labour_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910523,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Anti-corruption and bribery policy reflected in management procedures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Anti_corruption_and_bribery_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Anti-corruption and bribery policy reflected in management procedures",
      "question": "Is the company's anti-corruption, bribery and presentation of false information policy reflected in their management procedures?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1.includes(\"Anti-bribery Corruption & Presentation of False Information\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5821748"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Anti_Corruption_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Anti_corruption_and_bribery_policy_reflected_in_management_procedures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910568,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Grievance Mechanisms",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Grievance_Mechanisms.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanisms",
      "question": "Does the company describe a grievance mechanism that is available to direct employees and/or supply chain workers?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - direct employees",
        "Yes - supply chain workers",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var answers, m3;\n\n  m3 = [m3].flat();\n\n  answers = [];\n\n  if ((m1 === \"Yes\") || m3.includes(\"Hotline (direct employees)\")) {\n    answers.push(\"Yes - direct employees\");\n  }\n\n  if ((m2 === \"Yes\") || m3.includes(\"Hotline (supply chain workers)\")) {\n    answers.push(\"Yes - supply chain workers\");\n  }\n\n  if (answers.length) {\n    answers;\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5822138",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5822168",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~6914295",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "latest"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 8504,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 2941,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Grievance_Mechanisms+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910589,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Percentage of suppliers with disclosed address",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_suppliers_with_disclosed_address.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Percentage of suppliers with disclosed address",
      "question": "For what percentage (%) of the company's known suppliers has the address been disclosed?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([m1].flat()) / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "company": "Commons+Supplied By",
          "metric": "~3206235",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2929009",
          "name": "m2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 673,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 288,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_suppliers_with_disclosed_address+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910600,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Percentage of supplier with number of workers disclosed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_supplier_with_number_of_workers_disclosed.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Percentage of supplier with number of workers disclosed",
      "question": "For what percentage (%) of the company's known suppliers has the number of workers been disclosed?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([disclosures].flat()) / suppliers * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "company": "Commons+Supplied By",
          "metric": "~8093394",
          "name": "disclosures"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2929009",
          "name": "suppliers"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 778,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 350,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Supply_Chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_supplier_with_number_of_workers_disclosed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910611,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Percentage of suppliers with proportion of female workers disclosed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_suppliers_with_proportion_of_female_workers_disclosed.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Percentage of suppliers with proportion of female workers disclosed",
      "question": "For what percentage (%) of the company's known suppliers has the proportion of female workers been disclosed?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> </p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([disclosures].flat()) / suppliers * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "company": "Commons+Supplied By",
          "metric": "~8093374",
          "name": "disclosures"
        },
        {
          "year": "latest",
          "metric": "~2929009",
          "name": "suppliers"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 12143,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 350,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Supply_Chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_suppliers_with_proportion_of_female_workers_disclosed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910622,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Percentage of suppliers with proportion of male workers disclosed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_suppliers_with_proportion_of_male_workers_disclosed.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Percentage of suppliers with proportion of male workers disclosed",
      "question": "For what percentage (%) of the company's known suppliers has the proportion of male workers been disclosed?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([males].flat()) / suppliers * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "company": "Commons+Supplied By",
          "metric": "~8089792",
          "name": "males"
        },
        {
          "year": "latest",
          "metric": "~2929009",
          "name": "suppliers"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 12143,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 350,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Supply_Chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_suppliers_with_proportion_of_male_workers_disclosed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7910633,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Percentage of suppliers with proportion of migrant workers disclosed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_suppliers_with_proportion_of_migrant_workers_disclosed.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Percentage of suppliers with proportion of migrant workers disclosed",
      "question": "For what percentage (%) of the company's known suppliers has the proportion of migrant workers been disclosed?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  numKnown([m1].flat()) / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "company": "Commons+Supplied By",
          "metric": "~8089465",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "year": "latest",
          "metric": "~2929009",
          "name": "m2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1289,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 274,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Workforce_Disclosure_Rate_Supply_Chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_suppliers_with_proportion_of_migrant_workers_disclosed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 7913633,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Public Due Diligence Reporting (Step 5.1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Public_Due_Diligence_Reporting_Step_5_1.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Public Due Diligence Reporting (Step 5.1)",
      "question": "Does the company publish annually or integrate due diligence information on any of the following?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.</p>\r\n<p>However, upon further review the assessment's focus was narrowed down to a set of core metrics which this metric is not part of. The narrowed down assessment can be found here: <a href=\"/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research\">https://wikirate.org/OECD_Minerals_Guidance_Research</a><br><br>The [[http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf|OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas]] (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This information will most likely be found in a Responsible Sourcing Policy, Code of Conduct, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report. Select as many of the options as found.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Management systems",
        "Risk assessment",
        "Risk assessment and management",
        "Risk mitigation",
        "Audit reports (directly or via third party)",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Code of Conduct",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 101,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 101,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Public_Due_Diligence_Reporting_Step_5_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8039226,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Environmental Initiatives, Commitments & Certifications Participation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Environmental Initiatives, Commitments & Certifications Participation",
      "question": "Did the company take part in any environmental initiatives, commitments or certification schemes?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">This metric assesses whether a company discloses being part of industry initiatives, commitments or certifications that aim to improve environmental impacts at an industry level.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Below is a list of the initiatives and certifications that are included in this assessment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Apparel Research Group+Environmental Initiatives, Commitments & Certifications Participation+Apparel Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var m7, m8;\n\n  if ([\"Already Achieved\", \"By 2020\", \"By 2030\", \"By 2040\", \"By 2050\", \"After 2050\"].includes(m7)) {\n    m7 = \"Yes\";\n  }\n\n  if ([\"Core Partner\", \"Participant\"].includes(m8)) {\n    m8 = \"Yes\";\n  }\n\n  if ([m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, m8].includes(\"Yes\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5406500",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5414321",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~5414787",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~5418087",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~7447686",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~5306792",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~5749396",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m8",
          "metric": "~5405527",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 23541,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 3363,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation+Apparel_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8039245,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Environmental Initiatives, Commitments & Certifications Participation+Apparel Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation+Apparel_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Environmental Initiatives, Commitments & Certifications Participation",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for taking part in environmental industry initiatives, commitments or certifications?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. This score is here to convert the underlying data to this 10-point scale and make it comparable. To see what data is feeding into this standardized score, dig one layer deeper.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 23541,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 3363,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation+Apparel_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8039716,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Social Initiatives, Commitments & Certifications Participation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Social Initiatives, Commitments & Certifications Participation",
      "question": "Did the company take part in any social industry initiatives, commitments or certification schemes?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric assesses whether a company discloses being part of industry initiatives, commitments or certifications that aim to improve social impacts at an industry level.</p>\r\n<p>Below is a list of the initiatives and certifications that are included in this assessment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Apparel Research Group+Social Initiatives, Commitments & Certifications Participation+Apparel Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var m6, m7;\n\n  if ((typeof m6 === 'string') && m6.match(\"Yes\")) {\n    m6 = \"Yes\";\n  }\n\n  if ([\"Full\", \"Foundation stage\"].includes(m7)) {\n    m7 = \"Yes\";\n  }\n\n  if ([m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7].includes(\"Yes\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5346135",
          "not_researched": "No",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5340897",
          "not_researched": "No",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~5340657",
          "not_researched": "No",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~46944",
          "not_researched": "No",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~5412982",
          "not_researched": "No",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~3095017",
          "not_researched": "No",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~168322",
          "not_researched": "No",
          "year": "latest"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3648,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1216,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation+Apparel_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8039725,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Social Initiatives, Commitments & Certifications Participation+Apparel Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation+Apparel_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Social Initiatives, Commitments & Certifications Participation",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for taking part in social industry initiatives, commitments or certifications?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. This score is here to convert the underlying data to this 10-point scale and make it comparable. To see what data is feeding into this standardized score, dig one layer deeper.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3648,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 1216,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Business_substainbility_and_social_impact_Group+Seek_Limited_SDG8.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Initiatives_Commitments_Certifications_Participation+Apparel_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8039732,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Supply Chain Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Supply Chain Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following indicators did the company disclose?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">This metric assesses how much a company discloses about their supply chain. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Below is a list of the metrics that are included in this assessment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Apparel Research Group+Supply Chain Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var m1, numNo, researched;\n\n  if (m1 === 0) {\n    m1 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  researched = [m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7].filter(function(val) {\n    return val !== \"NR\";\n  });\n\n  numNo = researched.filter(function(a) {\n    return [a].flat()[0] === \"No\";\n  }).length;\n\n  (numKnown(researched) - numNo) / researched.length * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~7910589",
          "year": "latest",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5458839",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~5467323",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~5467351",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~5467337",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m6",
          "metric": "~5467407",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m7",
          "metric": "~5661916",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "latest"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 300,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8039741,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Supply Chain Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Supply Chain Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for supply chain disclosure?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. This score is here to convert the underlying data to this 10-point scale and make it comparable. To see what data is feeding into this standardized score, dig one layer deeper.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 300,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Governance_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8039749,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Anti-Corruption Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Anti_Corruption_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Anti-Corruption Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following indicators did the company disclose?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">This metric assesses how much a company discloses about their (anti)corruption policies and procedures. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Below is a list of the metrics that are included in this assessment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Apparel Research Group+Anti-Corruption Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var m2, m3, researched;\n\n  if (m2 === \"No\") {\n    m2 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  if (m3 === \"No\") {\n    m3 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  researched = [m1, m2, m3].filter(function(val) {\n    return val !== \"NR\";\n  });\n\n  numKnown(researched) / researched.length * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3446459",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~7910237",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "+1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~7910523",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "+1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 193,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 99,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Anti_Corruption_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Anti_Corruption_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8039758,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Anti-Corruption Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Anti_Corruption_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Anti-Corruption Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for anti-corruption disclosure?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. This score is here to convert the underlying data to this 10-point scale and make it comparable. To see what data is feeding into this standardized score, dig one layer deeper.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 193,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 99,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Governance_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Anti_Corruption_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8039764,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Business Model Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Business_Model_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Business Model Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following indicators did the company disclose?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">This metric assesses how much a company discloses about (the sustainability of) their business model. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Below is a list of the metrics that are included in this assessment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Apparel Research Group+Business Model Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var researched;\n\n  researched = [m1, m2, m3, m4, m5].filter(function(val) {\n    return val !== \"NR\";\n  });\n\n  numKnown(researched) / researched.length * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5467309",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~5467295",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~5468225",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~5768810",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~3094828",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "latest"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 297,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 99,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Business_Model_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Business_Model_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8039773,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Business Model Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Business_Model_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Business Model Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for business model disclosure?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. This score is here to convert the underlying data to this 10-point scale and make it comparable. To see what data is feeding into this standardized score, dig one layer deeper.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 297,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 99,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Governance_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Business_Model_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8039779,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Economic Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Economic_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Economic Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following indicators did the company disclose?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">This metric assesses how much a company discloses about their economic situation and jurisdiction. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Below is a list of the metrics that are included in this assessment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Apparel Research Group+Economic Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var inputs, researched;\n\n  inputs = [m1, m2, m3];\n\n  researched = inputs.filter(function(val) {\n    return val !== \"NR\";\n  });\n\n  numKnown(researched) / researched.length * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~5456201",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~3624408",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~3341320",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 297,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 99,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Economic_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Economic_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8039788,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Economic Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Economic_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Economic Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for economic disclosure?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. This score is here to convert the underlying data to this 10-point scale and make it comparable. To see what data is feeding into this standardized score, dig one layer deeper.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 297,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 99,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Governance_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Economic_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8039794,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Shareholder Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Shareholder_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Shareholder Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What percentage of the following indicators did the company disclose?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric assesses how much is publicly known about company's shareholders. </p>\r\n<p>Below is a list of the metrics that are included in this assessment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Apparel Research Group+Shareholder Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var m1, researched;\n\n  if (m1 === \"0\") {\n    m1 = \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n  researched = [m1, m2].filter(function(val) {\n    return val !== \"NR\";\n  });\n\n  numKnown(researched) / researched.length * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~8085660",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "latest"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~4049109",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "latest"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 400,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Shareholder_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Shareholder_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8039803,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Shareholder Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Shareholder_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Shareholder Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for shareholder disclosure?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. This score is here to convert the underlying data to this 10-point scale and make it comparable. To see what data is feeding into this standardized score, dig one layer deeper.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 400,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Governance_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Shareholder_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8040073,
      "name": "Commons+Tea Supplied By",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Tea_Supplied_By.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Tea Supplied By",
      "question": "What companies supply tea to this company?",
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": "<p>Without supply chain transparency, tea workers don’t know where the tea they pick goes and remediation for abuses from forced labour to gender-based violence stop at the estate instead of going up the chain to where most of the value lies.  </p>\r\n<p>The Business &amp; Human Rights Resource Centre addressed this gap by approaching 65 companies with a request for them to disclose the estates and bought-leaf factories that they source their tea from, to be held centrally in the first Tea Transparency Tracker - hosted by Wikirate. We now have 3100+ estates and factories linked to 20 companies on the Tracker. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This data has been collected either by the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre through company responses to their Tea Transparency Tracker project or through public disclosures on company websites</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Estate",
        "Factory",
        "Intermediary"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 30,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Laureen_van_Breen+Modern_Slavery_Act_Disclosure_Rate_of_Portfolio_Companies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Tea_Supplied_By+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8040080,
      "name": "Commons+Tea Supplier Of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Tea_Supplier_Of.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Tea Supplier Of",
      "question": "What companies does this company supply tea to?",
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Without supply chain transparency, tea workers don’t know where the tea they pick goes and remediation for abuses from forced labour to gender-based violence stop at the estate instead of going up the chain to where most of the value lies.  </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">The Business &amp; Human Rights Resource Centre addressed this gap by approaching 65 companies with a request for them to disclose the estates and bought-leaf factories that they source their tea from, to be held centrally in the first Tea Transparency Tracker - hosted by Wikirate. We now have 3100+ estates and factories linked to 20 companies on the Tracker. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">This data has been collected by the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre through company responses to their Tea Transparency Tracker project. </span></p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6178,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3723,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Tea_Supplier_Of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8040224,
      "name": "Rainforest Alliance+Tea Volume",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Rainforest_Alliance+Tea_Volume.json",
      "designer": "Rainforest Alliance",
      "title": "Tea Volume",
      "question": "What is the yearly volume of tea produced by this facility (in tonnes)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Rainforest Alliance is an international non-profit organization working at the intersection of business, agriculture, and forests to make responsible business the new normal.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Farms, forest communities, and businesses that participate in the RA certification program are audited against sustainability standards based on the triple bottom line: environmental, economic, and social well-being. More than two million farmers follow the RA agriculture standards in 70 countries around the globe. Our programs focus on coffee, cocoa, tea, bananas, and other commodity sectors facing urgent environmental and social challenges.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: <a href=\"http://rainforest-alliance.org/\" target=\"_blank\">rainforest-alliance.org</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The data in this metric reflects the data in the Rainforest Alliance list of certified farms and CoC operations. The list can be found </span><a href=\"https://www.rainforest-alliance.org/business/certification/certificate-search-and-public-summaries/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Tonnes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 497,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 497,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Rainforest_Alliance+Tea_Volume+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8040234,
      "name": "Rainforest Alliance+Rainforest Alliance Certification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Rainforest_Alliance+Rainforest_Alliance_Certification.json",
      "designer": "Rainforest Alliance",
      "title": "Rainforest Alliance Certification",
      "question": "Is the company a Rainforest Alliance certified entity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Rainforest Alliance is an international non-profit organization working at the intersection of business, agriculture, and forests to make responsible business the new normal.</p>\r\n<p>Farms, forest communities, and businesses that participate in the RA certification program are audited against sustainability standards based on the triple bottom line: environmental, economic, and social well-being. More than two million farmers follow the RA agriculture standards in 70 countries around the globe. Our programs focus on coffee, cocoa, tea, bananas, and other commodity sectors facing urgent environmental and social challenges.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.rainforest-alliance.org/approach/\">rainforest-alliance.org</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The data in this metric reflects the Rainforest Alliance list of certified farms and CoC operations. The list can be found </span><a href=\"https://www.rainforest-alliance.org/business/certification/certificate-search-and-public-summaries/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Cattle",
        "Cereal",
        "Cocoa",
        "Coffee",
        "Fruit",
        "Herb & Spices",
        "Multi-ingredient consumer product",
        "Nuts and other seeds",
        "Oilseeds and oleaginous",
        "Ornamental & medicinal plants",
        "Rooibos",
        "Rubber Tree",
        "Tea",
        "Vegetable",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 497,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 497,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+Rainforest_Alliance_and_Fairtrade_Certified.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Number_of_Identified_Rainforest_Alliance_Certified_Tea_Suppliers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Rainforest_Alliance+Rainforest_Alliance_Certification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8040244,
      "name": "Fairtrade+Fairtrade Certification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairtrade+Fairtrade_Certification.json",
      "designer": "Fairtrade",
      "title": "Fairtrade Certification",
      "question": "Is the company Fairtrade certified?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Fairtrade certification is a product certification system where social, economic and environmental aspects of production are certified against Fairtrade Standards for Producers and Traders.</p>\r\n<p>The Fairtrade system monitors the buying and the selling of the product until it is consumer packaged and labelled. Certificates are only issued after a physical inspection has confirmed that all relevant Fairtrade Standards have been complied with.</p>\r\n<p>To find out more about Fairtrade certification click <a href=\"https://www.flocert.net/solutions/standard-assurance/fairtrade-certification/\">here</a>.</p>\r\n<p>Fair Trade certification refers to certification according to Fair Trade standards. To find out more visit <a href=\"http://www.wfto.com\">www.wfto.com</a>.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.flocert.net/glossary/fairtrade-certification-fair-trade-certification/\">Flocert.net</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To research whether an entity is a Fairtrade producer, search the <a href=\"https://www.fairtrade.net/finder\" target=\"_blank\">Fairtrade Finder</a>. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Certified",
        "Not Certified",
        "Suspended"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 660,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 660,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+Rainforest_Alliance_and_Fairtrade_Certified.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Fairtrade_Suppliers_Suspended.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Number_of_Identified_Fairtrade_Certified_Tea_Suppliers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairtrade+Fairtrade_Certification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8040254,
      "name": "Ethical Tea Partnership+Ethical Tea Partnership Member",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Ethical_Tea_Partnership+Ethical_Tea_Partnership_Member.json",
      "designer": "Ethical Tea Partnership",
      "title": "Ethical Tea Partnership Member",
      "question": "Is the company a member of the Ethical Tea Partnership?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Ethical Tea Partnership is a Private Limited Company that has been working with tea producers and tea companies to improve the sustainability of the tea industry since 1997. This industry-wide initiative, which was originally called the Tea Sourcing Partnership, was established by a number of large UK tea packing companies who took the decision to work together to improve the social conditions in their supply chains. Later on, ETP membership opened up to non UK-based tea packers, and extended the scheme to include environmental issues as well.</p>\r\n<p>The ETP works in all the main tea producing regions, with a London-based Secretariat, and five regional managers based in Kenya, India, Indonesia, Sri Lanka and China.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethical_Tea_Partnership\">wikipedia.org</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The data in this metric reflects the Ethical Tea Partnership member list. The list can be found <a href=\"https://www.ethicalteapartnership.org/our-members-2/\">here</a>. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Member List",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 94,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 51,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Ethical_Tea_Partnership+Ethical_Tea_Partnership_Member+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8040264,
      "name": "Fairtrade+Product Categories",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairtrade+Product_Categories.json",
      "designer": "Fairtrade",
      "title": "Product Categories",
      "question": "Which Fairtrade product categories does this company produce?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Fairtrade certification is a product certification system where social, economic and environmental aspects of production are certified against Fairtrade Standards for Producers and Traders.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Fairtrade system monitors the buying and the selling of the product until it is consumer packaged and labelled. Certificates are only issued after a physical inspection has confirmed that all relevant Fairtrade Standards have been complied with.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To find out more about Fairtrade certification click <a href=\"https://www.flocert.net/solutions/standard-assurance/fairtrade-certification/\">here</a>.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Fair Trade certification refers to certification according to Fair Trade standards. To find out more visit <a href=\"http://www.wfto.com\">www.wfto.com</a>.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: <a href=\"https://www.flocert.net/glossary/fairtrade-certification-fair-trade-certification/\">Flocert.net</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To research which product category the entity produces, search the </span><a href=\"https://www.fairtrade.net/finder\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">Fairtrade Finder</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p><em>Please note that this metric is multi-category and so more than one option can be selected.</em></p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Banana",
        "Cane sugar",
        "Carbon Credits",
        "Cereals",
        "Cocoa",
        "Coffee",
        "Cotton",
        "Dried fruit",
        "Dried vegetables",
        "Flowers and Plants",
        "Fonio",
        "Fresh fruit",
        "Fruit juices",
        "Gold & associated Precious Metals",
        "Gold ASP",
        "herbal teas & spices",
        "Honey",
        "Nuts",
        "Oilseeds and Oleaginous fruit",
        "Pulp",
        "Quinoa",
        "Rice",
        "Seed cotton",
        "Shrimps",
        "Sports Balls",
        "Tea",
        "Textile",
        "Timber",
        "Vegetables",
        "Wine grapes",
        "Herbs"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 662,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 662,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairtrade+Product_Categories+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8061828,
      "name": "Aileen Rob+Rainforest Alliance and Fairtrade Certified",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+Rainforest_Alliance_and_Fairtrade_Certified.json",
      "designer": "Aileen Rob",
      "title": "Rainforest Alliance and Fairtrade Certified",
      "question": "Is this facility both Rainforest Alliance and Fairtrade certified?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric calculates whether an entity is both <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Rainforest Alliance and Fairtrade</span> certified. </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if ((m1 === \"Tea\") && (m2 === \"Certified\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~8040234",
          "not_researched": "No"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~8040244",
          "not_researched": "No"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+Rainforest_Alliance_and_Fairtrade_Certified+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8062856,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Terms of Employment Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Terms of Employment Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for terms of employment disclosure?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. This score is here to convert the underlying data to this 10-point scale and make it comparable. To see what data is feeding into this standardized score, dig one layer deeper.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 196,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 100,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Business_substainbility_and_social_impact_Group+Seek_Limited_SDG8.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Terms_of_Employment_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8062869,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Environmental Damage & Protection Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Damage_Protection_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Environmental Damage & Protection Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for environmental damage and protection disclosure?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. This score is here to convert the underlying data to this 10-point scale and make it comparable. To see what data is feeding into this standardized score, dig one layer deeper.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reputational Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1260,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 727,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Environmental_Damage_Protection_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8062877,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Human Rights Disclosure Rate+Apparel Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Human Rights Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for human rights disclosure?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. This score is here to convert the underlying data to this 10-point scale and make it comparable. To see what data is feeding into this standardized score, dig one layer deeper.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 291,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 97,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Business_substainbility_and_social_impact_Group+Seek_Limited_SDG8.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Human_Rights_Disclosure_Rate+Apparel_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8062911,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+1.1 Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_1_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "1.1 Commitment",
      "question": "What did this company score for 1.1 Commitment in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company publicly demonstrates its commitment to addressing forced labor and human trafficking. The company:<br><br>(1) publicly demonstrates its commitment to addressing forced labor and human trafficking.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+1.1 Commitment+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_1_Commitment+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_1_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8062922,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+1.2 Supplier Code of Conduct",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_2_Supplier_Code_of_Conduct.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "1.2 Supplier Code of Conduct",
      "question": "What did this company score for 1.2 Supplier Code of Conduct in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company has a supplier code of conduct that requires suppliers throughout its supply chains to respect the ILO core labor standards, including the elimination of forced labor. The standard is easily accessible on the company’s website, is regularly updated, is communicated to the company's suppliers, and requires suppliers to cascade the standards to their own suppliers. The company's supplier code of conduct: <br><br>(1) requires suppliers to respect the ILO core labor standards, which include the elimination of forced labor;<br><br>(2) is easily accessible from the company's website; <br><br>(3) is updated regularly, following internal review and input from external stakeholders; <br><br>(4) is communicated to the company's suppliers; and<br><br>(5) requires its first-tier suppliers to take steps to ensure that their own suppliers implement standards that are in-line with the company's supply chain policies addressing forced labor and human trafficking.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+1.2 Supplier Code of Conduct+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_2_Supplier_Code_of_Conduct+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_2_Supplier_Code_of_Conduct+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8062933,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+1.3 Management and Accountability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_3_Management_and_Accountability.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "1.3 Management and Accountability",
      "question": "What did this company score for 1.3 Management and Accountability in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company has established clear responsibilities and accountability for the implementation of its supply chain policies that address forced labor and human trafficking, both within the company and at the board level. The company:<br><br>(1) has a committee, team, program, or officer responsible for the implementation of its supply chain policies that address forced labor and human trafficking; and <br><br>(2) has tasked a board member or board committee with oversight of its supply chain policies that address forced labor and human trafficking.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+1.3 Management and Accountability+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_3_Management_and_Accountability+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_3_Management_and_Accountability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8062944,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+1.4 Training",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_4_Training.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "1.4 Training",
      "question": "What did this company score for 1.4 Training in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company takes steps to ensure that relevant decision-makers within the company and in different tiers of its supply chains are aware of risks related to forced labor and human trafficking and are effectively implementing the company's policies. The company:<br><br>(1) trains all relevant decision-makers within the company on risks and policies that address forced labor and human trafficking; <br><br>(2) trains its first-tier suppliers on risks and policies that address forced labor and human trafficking and discloses the percentage of first-tier suppliers trained; and<br><br>(3) engages in capacity building to enable its suppliers to cascade its supply chain policies that address forced labor and human trafficking to their own supply chains and/or trains suppliers below the first tier on such policies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+1.4 Training+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_4_Training+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_4_Training+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8062955,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+1.5 Stakeholder Engagement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_5_Stakeholder_Engagement.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "1.5 Stakeholder Engagement",
      "question": "What did this company score for 1.5 Stakeholder Engagement in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company engages with relevant stakeholders on forced labor and human trafficking. This includes engaging with policy makers, worker rights organizations, or local NGOs in countries in which its first- and lower-tier suppliers operate, as well as actively participating in one or more multi-stakeholder or industry initiatives. To fully understand and address working conditions in sourcing countries, companies need to engage with potentially affected groups and local stakeholders such as trade unions, worker organizations, or local NGOs—in addition to engaging suppliers. Furthermore, as forced labor risks tend to be systemic in nature, collaboration with other companies, for example, to engage policy makers to strengthen labor legislation, is needed to address forced labor in supply chains.<br><br>In the last three years, the company has engaged relevant stakeholders by:<br><br>(1) providing at least two examples of engagements on forced labor and human trafficking with stakeholders such as policy makers, worker rights organizations, or local NGOs in countries in which its first-tier suppliers and suppliers below the first tier operate; and<br><br>(2) actively participating in one or more multi-stakeholder or industry initiatives focused on eradicating forced labor and human trafficking across the industry.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+1.5 Stakeholder Engagement+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_5_Stakeholder_Engagement+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_5_Stakeholder_Engagement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8062966,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+2.1 Traceability and Supply Chain Transparency",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+2_1_Traceability_and_Supply_Chain_Transparency.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "2.1 Traceability and Supply Chain Transparency",
      "question": "What did this company score for 2.1 Traceability and Supply Chain Transparency in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company demonstrates an understanding of the suppliers and their workers throughout its supply chains by publicly disclosing the names and addresses of its first-tier suppliers, the countries of its below-first-tier suppliers, the sourcing countries of raw materials at high risk of forced labor and human trafficking, and several data points on its suppliers' workforce. The company discloses:<br><br>(1) the names and addresses of its first-tier suppliers;<br><br>(2) the countries of its below-first-tier suppliers (this does not include raw material suppliers);<br><br>(3) the sourcing countries of at least three raw materials at high risk of forced labor and human trafficking; and<br><br>(4) at least two types of data points on its suppliers' workforce (e.g., the number of workers, gender or migrant worker ratio, or level of unionization per supplier).</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+2.1 Traceability and Supply Chain Transparency+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+2_1_Traceability_and_Supply_Chain_Transparency+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+2_1_Traceability_and_Supply_Chain_Transparency+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8062977,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+2.2 Risk Assessment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+2_2_Risk_Assessment.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "2.2 Risk Assessment",
      "question": "What did this company score for 2.2 Risk Assessment in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company has a process to assess forced labor risks, and it publicly discloses forced labor risks identified in different tiers of its supply chains. Risk assessment involves evaluating the potential that a company has (by virtue of who its suppliers are and where they are located) of being linked to forced labor and human trafficking. Risk assessment is a process that is carried out in addition to and outside of auditing. It helps identify potential forced labor risks as well as actual impacts that may be hard to detect through audits. This process may involve engaging local stakeholders, labor rights experts, independent sources, and assessing risks associated with specific raw materials, regions, or groups of workers such as migrant workers.<br><br>The company discloses:<br><br>(1) details on how it conducts human rights supply chain risk or impact assessments that include forced labor risks or assessments that focus specifically on forced labor risks; and <br><br>(2) details on forced labor risks identified in different tiers of its supply chains.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+2.2 Risk Assessment+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+2_2_Risk_Assessment+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+2_2_Risk_Assessment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8062988,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+3.1 Purchasing Practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_1_Purchasing_Practices.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "3.1 Purchasing Practices",
      "question": "What did this company score for 3.1 Purchasing Practices in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company is taking steps toward responsible raw materials sourcing. Further, it is adopting responsible purchasing practices in the first tier of its supply chains, which it demonstrates through disclosing quantitative data points and providing procurement incentives to first-tier suppliers to encourage or reward good labor practices. Purchasing practices and pricing may both positively impact labor standards in the company's supply chains and increase risks of forced labor and human trafficking. The company:<br><br>(1) is taking steps toward responsible raw materials sourcing; <br><br>(2) is adopting responsible purchasing practices in the first tier of its supply chains, which include planning and forecasting; <br><br>(3) provides procurement incentives to first-tier suppliers to encourage or reward good labor practices (such as price premiums, increased orders, and longer-term contracts); and<br><br>(4) discloses two quantitative data points demonstrating that it has responsible purchasing practices in place that address the risk of forced labor and human trafficking.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+3.1 Purchasing Practices+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_1_Purchasing_Practices+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_1_Purchasing_Practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8062999,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+3.2 Supplier Selection",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_2_Supplier_Selection.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "3.2 Supplier Selection",
      "question": "What did this company score for 3.2 Supplier Selection in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company assesses risks of forced labor at potential suppliers before entering into any contracts with them and discloses the outcomes of this process. The company:<br><br>(1) assesses risks of forced labor at potential suppliers before entering into any contracts with them and discloses details on the outcomes of this process.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+3.2 Supplier Selection+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_2_Supplier_Selection+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_2_Supplier_Selection+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8063010,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+3.3 Integration into Supplier Contracts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_3_Integration_into_Supplier_Contracts.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "3.3 Integration into Supplier Contracts",
      "question": "What did this company score for 3.3 Integration into Supplier Contracts in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company integrates the ILO core labor standards, which include the elimination of forced labor, into supplier contracts, and requires its suppliers to do the same. The company:<br><br>(1) integrates the ILO core labor standards, which include the elimination of forced labor, into supplier contracts; <br><br>(2) discloses the percentage of suppliers whose contracts include such standards; and<br><br>(3) requires its suppliers to integrate such standards into contracts with their own suppliers.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+3.3 Integration into Supplier Contracts+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_3_Integration_into_Supplier_Contracts+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_3_Integration_into_Supplier_Contracts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8063021,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+4.1 Recruitment Approach",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_1_Recruitment_Approach.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "4.1 Recruitment Approach",
      "question": "What did this company score for 4.1 Recruitment Approach in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company has a policy that requires direct employment in its supply chains. It specifies that employment and recruitment agencies in its supply chains respect the ILO core labor standards, which include the elimination of forced labor. The company discloses information on the recruitment agencies used by its suppliers. The company:<br><br>(1) has a policy that requires direct employment in its supply chains;<br><br>(2) requires employment and recruitment agencies used by its suppliers to respect the ILO core labor standards, which include the elimination of forced labor; and <br><br>(3) discloses information on the recruitment agencies used by its suppliers.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+4.1 Recruitment Approach+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_1_Recruitment_Approach+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_1_Recruitment_Approach+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8063032,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+4.2 Recruitment Fees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_2_Recruitment_Fees.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "4.2 Recruitment Fees",
      "question": "What did this company score for 4.2 Recruitment Fees in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company requires that no worker in its supply chains should pay for a job—the costs of recruitment (i.e., recruitment fees and related costs) should be borne not by the worker but by the employer (\"Employer Pays Principle\"). If it discovers that fees have been paid by workers in its supply chains, the company takes steps to ensure that such fees are reimbursed to the workers and/or provides evidence of payment of recruitment-related fees by suppliers. According to the ILO, workers should not be charged directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, any fees for recruitment or related costs (such as costs for training, medical tests, or travel).<br><br>The company:<br><br>(1) requires that no worker in its supply chains should pay for a job—the costs of recruitment (i.e., recruitment fees and related costs) should be borne not by the worker but by the employer (\"Employer Pays Principle\"); and<br><br>(2) takes steps to ensure that such fees are reimbursed to the workers and/or provides evidence of payment of recruitment-related fees by suppliers if it discovers that fees have been paid by workers in its supply chains.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+4.2 Recruitment Fees+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_2_Recruitment_Fees+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_2_Recruitment_Fees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8063043,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+4.3 Monitoring and Responsible Recruitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_3_Monitoring_and_Responsible_Recruitment.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "4.3 Monitoring and Responsible Recruitment",
      "question": "What did this company score for 4.3 Monitoring and Responsible Recruitment in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company takes steps to ensure the employment and/or recruitment agencies used in its supply chains are monitored to assess and address risks of forced labor and human trafficking. Further, it provides details of how it supports responsible recruitment in its supply chains. The company:<br><br>(1) takes steps to ensure employment and/or recruitment agencies used by its suppliers are monitored to assess and address risks of forced labor and human trafficking; and<br><br>(2) provides details of how it supports responsible recruitment in its supply chains (e.g., by collaborating with stakeholders to engage policy makers to strengthen recruitment standards).</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+4.3 Monitoring and Responsible Recruitment+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_3_Monitoring_and_Responsible_Recruitment+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_3_Monitoring_and_Responsible_Recruitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8063054,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+4.4 Rights of Workers in Vulnerable Conditions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_4_Rights_of_Workers_in_Vulnerable_Conditions.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "4.4 Rights of Workers in Vulnerable Conditions",
      "question": "What did this company score for 4.4 Rights of Workers in Vulnerable Conditions in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To avoid the exploitation of migrant workers and other workers in vulnerable conditions in its supply chains, the company takes steps to ensure these workers understand the terms and conditions of their recruitment and employment and also understand their rights. It further takes steps to ensure its suppliers refrain from restricting workers’ movement, and it provides evidence of how it works with suppliers to ensure the rights of workers in vulnerable conditions are respected. Migrant workers and other workers in vulnerable conditions are at a higher risk of being in forced labor, and additional steps are needed to ensure their rights are respected. Conditions which render workers vulnerable may include characteristics such as gender or age and external factors, including workers' legal status, employment status, economic conditions, and work environment (such as isolation, dependency on the employer, or language barriers).<br><br>The company:<br><br>(1) takes steps to ensure migrant workers in its supply chains understand the terms and conditions of their recruitment and employment and also understand their rights; <br><br>(2) takes steps to ensure its suppliers refrain from restricting workers’ movement, including through the retention of passports or other personal documents against workers' will; and<br><br>(3) discloses at least two outcomes of steps it has taken to ensure respect of the fundamental rights and freedoms of supply chain workers in vulnerable conditions (those articulated in the ILO core labor standards, which include the elimination of forced labor).</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+4.4 Rights of Workers in Vulnerable Conditions+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_4_Rights_of_Workers_in_Vulnerable_Conditions+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_4_Rights_of_Workers_in_Vulnerable_Conditions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8063065,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+5.1 Worker Engagement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_1_Worker_Engagement.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "5.1 Worker Engagement",
      "question": "What did this company score for 5.1 Worker Engagement in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company takes steps to ensure that its forced labor and human trafficking policies are communicated to workers in its supply chains. The company further works with relevant stakeholders to engage with and educate workers in its supply chains on their labor rights and/or supports worker-led efforts on labor rights education. The company provides evidence of the positive impact of worker engagement in its supply chains. The company:<br><br>(1) takes steps to ensure its supply chain policies that address forced labor and human trafficking are communicated to workers in its supply chains;<br><br>(2) takes steps to ensure that relevant stakeholders engage with and educate workers in its supply chains on their labor rights and/or supports worker-led efforts on labor rights education; <br><br>(3) provides evidence of the positive impact of worker engagement in its supply chains; and<br><br>(4) provides at least two examples of worker engagement initiatives covering different supply chain contexts.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+5.1 Worker Engagement+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_1_Worker_Engagement+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_1_Worker_Engagement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8063076,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+5.2 Freedom of Association",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_2_Freedom_of_Association.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "5.2 Freedom of Association",
      "question": "What did this company score for 5.2 Freedom of Association in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To support collective worker empowerment, the company works with local or global trade unions to support freedom of association in its supply chains. It enters into a global framework agreement that covers its supply chains and/or an enforceable supply chain labor rights agreement with trade unions or worker organizations. Where there are regulatory constraints on freedom of association, the company ensures workplace environments in which workers are able to pursue alternative forms of organizing. The company:<br><br>(1) works with independent local or global trade unions to support freedom of association in its supply chains; <br><br>(2) discloses that it is party to a global framework agreement that covers its supply chains and/or an enforceable supply chain labor rights agreement with trade unions or worker organizations;<br><br>(3) takes steps to ensure workplace environments in which its suppliers' workers are able to pursue alternative forms of organizing (e.g., worker councils or worker-management dialogues) where there are regulatory constraints on freedom of association; and<br><br>(4) provides at least two examples covering different supply chain contexts of how it improved freedom of association and/or collective bargaining for its suppliers' workers such as migrant workers (e.g., by taking action where suppliers impede workers' rights to freedom of association and/or collective bargaining or by engaging policy makers to improve respect for such rights).</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+5.2 Freedom of Association+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_2_Freedom_of_Association+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_2_Freedom_of_Association+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8063087,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+5.3 Grievance Mechanism",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_3_Grievance_Mechanism.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "5.3 Grievance Mechanism",
      "question": "What did this company score for 5.3 Grievance Mechanism in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company takes steps to ensure a formal mechanism to report a grievance to an impartial entity regarding labor conditions in the company's supply chains is available to its suppliers' workers and their legitimate representatives. The company ensures that the mechanism is effective across its supply chains. The company: <br><br>(1) takes steps to ensure a formal mechanism to report a grievance to an impartial entity regarding labor conditions in the company's supply chains is available to its suppliers' workers and their legitimate representatives;<br><br>(2) takes steps to ensure that the existence of the mechanism is communicated to its suppliers' workers; <br><br>(3) takes steps to ensure that its suppliers' workers or their legitimate representatives are involved in the design and/or performance of the mechanism, to ensure that the workers trust the mechanism;<br><br>(4) discloses data about the practical operation of the mechanism, such as the number of grievances filed, addressed, and resolved, or an evaluation of the effectiveness of the mechanism; and<br><br>(5) provides evidence that the mechanism is available and used by workers below the first tier in its supply chains.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+5.3 Grievance Mechanism+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_3_Grievance_Mechanism+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_3_Grievance_Mechanism+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8063098,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+6.1 Monitoring Process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+6_1_Monitoring_Process.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "6.1 Monitoring Process",
      "question": "What did this company score for 6.1 Monitoring Process in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To track and improve implementation of its supply chain policies that address forced labor and human trafficking, the company monitors its suppliers. The process includes non-scheduled visits, a review of relevant documents, off-site interviews with workers, and visits to associated production facilities and related worker housing. The company also takes steps to ensure suppliers below the first tier are monitored. To improve implementation of its supply chain policies, conditions at supplier level can be monitored in different ways. This could include specialized audits to detect forced labor at higher-risk suppliers or worker-driven monitoring (i.e., monitoring undertaken by independent organizations that includes worker participation and is guided by workers’ rights and priorities). <br><br>The company has a supplier monitoring process that includes: <br><br>(1) non-scheduled visits; <br><br>(2) a review of relevant documents; <br><br>(3) off-site interviews with workers; <br><br>(4) visits to associated production facilities and related worker housing; and<br><br>(5) steps to ensure that suppliers below the first tier are monitored.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+6.1 Monitoring Process+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+6_1_Monitoring_Process+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+6_1_Monitoring_Process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8063109,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+6.2 Monitoring Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+6_2_Monitoring_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "6.2 Monitoring Disclosure",
      "question": "What did this company score for 6.2 Monitoring Disclosure in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company publicly discloses the following information on the results of its monitoring efforts: the percentage of suppliers monitored annually, the percentage of unannounced monitoring visits, the number or percentage of workers interviewed, information on the qualification of the monitoring organization used, and a summary of findings, including details regarding any violations revealed. The company may want to use worker-driven monitoring (i.e., monitoring undertaken by independent organizations, such as local worker-led organizations, unions, or local civil society partners) to ensure full identification of labor rights violations by those who are on the ground, all year round. The company discloses:<br><br>(1) the percentage of suppliers monitored annually;<br><br>(2) the percentage of unannounced monitoring visits; <br><br>(3) the number or percentage of workers interviewed; and<br><br>(4) information on the qualification of the monitoring organization used and/or the use of worker-driven monitoring (i.e., monitoring undertaken by independent organizations that includes worker participation and is guided by workers’ rights and priorities); and<br><br>(5) a summary of findings, including details regarding any violations revealed.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+6.2 Monitoring Disclosure+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+6_2_Monitoring_Disclosure+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+6_2_Monitoring_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8063120,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+7.1 Corrective Action Plans",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+7_1_Corrective_Action_Plans.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "7.1 Corrective Action Plans",
      "question": "What did this company score for 7.1 Corrective Action Plans in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company has a process to create corrective action plans with suppliers found to violate its policies, with the goal of improving conditions and achieving respect of the ILO core labor standards, which include the elimination of forced labor. The company's corrective action plans include potential actions taken in case of non-compliance, a means to verify remediation and/or implementation of corrective actions, and potential consequences if corrective actions are not taken. The company discloses:<br><br>(1) a corrective action process for its suppliers and potential actions taken in cases of non-compliance, such as stop-work notices, warning letters, supplementary training, and policy revision; <br><br>(2) a means to verify remediation and/or implementation of corrective actions, such as record review, employee interviews, or spot-checks;<br><br>(3) potential consequences if corrective actions are not taken; and<br><br>(4) a summary or an example of its corrective action process in practice.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+7.1 Corrective Action Plans+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+7_1_Corrective_Action_Plans+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+7_1_Corrective_Action_Plans+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8063131,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+7.2 Remedy Programs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+7_2_Remedy_Programs.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "7.2 Remedy Programs",
      "question": "What did this company score for 7.2 Remedy Programs in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>KnowTheChain benchmarks current corporate practices, develops insights, and provides practical resources that inform investor decisions and enable companies to comply with growing legal obligations while operating more transparently and responsibly.<br><br>The KnowTheChain benchmarks aim to help companies protect the wellbeing of workers by incentivizing companies and identifying gaps in each sector evaluated. <br><br>The KnowTheChain methodology is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and covers policy commitments, due diligence, and remedy. The methodology uses the ILO core labor standards (which cover the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work: freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, and the elimination of forced labor, child labor, and discrimination) as a baseline standard. The methodology has been developed through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and a review of other benchmarks, frameworks, and guidelines such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The company has a process to provide remedy to workers in its supply chains in cases of forced labor and human trafficking.<br><br>If no allegation regarding forced labor in the company's supply chains has been identified, the company discloses examples of outcomes of its remedy process for its suppliers' workers. A. If no allegation regarding forced labor in the first or lower tier of a company's supply chains has been identified and disclosed by a third party(ies) in the last three years, the company discloses:<br><br>(1) a process for responding to potential complaints and/or reported violations of policies that address forced labor and human trafficking; and<br><br>(2) at least two examples of outcomes of its remedy process in practice, covering different supply chain contexts, for its suppliers' workers. <br><br>If one or more allegations regarding forced labor in the company's supply chains have been identified, the company engages in a dialogue with the stakeholders reportedly affected in the allegation and takes steps to ensure the provision of remedy that is satisfactory to the victims or groups representing the victims. <br><br>B.1. If one or more allegations regarding forced labor in the first or lower tier of a company's supply chains have been identified and disclosed by a third party(ies) in the last three years, the company discloses:<br><br>(1) a process for responding to potential complaints and/or reported violations of policies that address forced labor and human trafficking; <br><br>(2) that it engages in a dialogue with the stakeholders reportedly affected in the allegation(s);<br><br>(3) outcomes of the remedy process in the case of the allegation(s); and<br><br>(4) evidence that remedy(ies) are satisfactory to the victims or groups representing the victims.<br><br>If one or more allegations regarding forced labor in the company's supply chains have been identified, and the company denies the allegation(s), the company discloses that it engages in a dialogue with the stakeholders reportedly affected in the allegation (or requires its supplier[s] to do so), and it discloses a description of what actions it would take to prevent and remediate the alleged impacts. <br><br>B.2. If one or more allegations regarding forced labor in the first or lower tier of a company's supply chains have been identified and disclosed by a third party(ies) in the last three years, and the company denies the allegation, the company discloses:<br><br>(1) a process for responding to potential complaints and/or reported violations of policies that address forced labor and human trafficking; <br><br>(2) a description of what actions it would take to prevent and remediate the alleged impacts; and<br><br>(3) that it engages in a dialogue with the stakeholders reportedly affected in the allegation or requires its supplier(s) to do so.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Points",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "KnowTheChain+7.2 Remedy Programs+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+7_2_Remedy_Programs+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+7_2_Remedy_Programs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8064320,
      "name": "Oxfam International+Oxfam Supermarkets Scorecard: Total Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_International+Oxfam_Supermarkets_Scorecard_Total_Score.json",
      "designer": "Oxfam International",
      "title": "Oxfam Supermarkets Scorecard: Total Score",
      "question": "What is the company's total score in the Oxfam Supermarket Scorecard? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Oxfam analysed the supermarkets’ policies and practices on human rights in their supply chains and asked whether supermarkets are transparent and accountable in the ways they ensure that workers’ rights are respected, farmers are prosperous and resilient and the women who produce our food are treated fairly.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The data in this metric can be found on the <a href=\"https://www.oxfam.org/en/take-action/campaigns/end-suffering-behind-your-food/supermarkets-scorecard\" target=\"_blank\">Oxfam Supermarket Scorecard</a> website. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 32,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 16,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Oxfam_International+Oxfam_Supermarkets_Scorecard_Total_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8076372,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+1.1 Commitment+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_1_Commitment+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "1.1 Commitment",
      "question": "What did this company score for 1.1 Commitment in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_Commitment_Governance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_1_Commitment+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8076389,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+7.2 Remedy Programs+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+7_2_Remedy_Programs+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "7.2 Remedy Programs",
      "question": "What did this company score for 7.2 Commitment in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+7_Remedy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+7_2_Remedy_Programs+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8076394,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+7.1 Corrective Action Plans+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+7_1_Corrective_Action_Plans+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "7.1 Corrective Action Plans",
      "question": "What did this company score for 7.1 Corrective Action Plans in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+7_Remedy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+7_1_Corrective_Action_Plans+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8076399,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+6.2 Monitoring Disclosure+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+6_2_Monitoring_Disclosure+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "6.2 Monitoring Disclosure",
      "question": "What did this company score for 6.2 Monitoring Disclosure in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+6_Monitoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+6_2_Monitoring_Disclosure+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8076404,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+5.3 Grievance Mechanism+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_3_Grievance_Mechanism+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "5.3 Grievance Mechanism",
      "question": "What did this company score for 5.3 Grievance Mechanism in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_Worker_Voice.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_3_Grievance_Mechanism+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8076409,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+6.1 Monitoring Process+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+6_1_Monitoring_Process+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "6.1 Monitoring Process",
      "question": "What did this company score for 6.1 Monitoring Process in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+6_Monitoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+6_1_Monitoring_Process+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8076414,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+5.2 Freedom of Association+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_2_Freedom_of_Association+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "5.2 Freedom of Association",
      "question": "What did this company score for 5.2 Freedom of Association in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_Worker_Voice.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_2_Freedom_of_Association+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8076419,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+5.1 Worker Engagement+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_1_Worker_Engagement+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "5.1 Worker Engagement",
      "question": "What did this company score for 5.1 Worker Engagement in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_Worker_Voice.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_1_Worker_Engagement+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8076424,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+4.3 Monitoring and Responsible Recruitment+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_3_Monitoring_and_Responsible_Recruitment+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "4.3 Monitoring and Responsible Recruitment",
      "question": "What did this company score for 4.3 Monitoring and Responsible Recruitment in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_Recruitment.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_3_Monitoring_and_Responsible_Recruitment+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8076429,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+4.4 Rights of Workers in Vulnerable Conditions+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_4_Rights_of_Workers_in_Vulnerable_Conditions+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "4.4 Rights of Workers in Vulnerable Conditions",
      "question": "What did this company score for 4.4 Rights of Workers in Vulnerable Conditions in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_Recruitment.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_4_Rights_of_Workers_in_Vulnerable_Conditions+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8076434,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+4.2 Recruitment Fees+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_2_Recruitment_Fees+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "4.2 Recruitment Fees",
      "question": "What did this company score for 4.2 Recruitment Fees in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_Recruitment.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_2_Recruitment_Fees+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8076439,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+4.1 Recruitment Approach+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_1_Recruitment_Approach+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "4.1 Recruitment Approach",
      "question": "What did this company score for 4.1 Recruitment Approach in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_Recruitment.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_1_Recruitment_Approach+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8076444,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+3.3 Integration into Supplier Contracts+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_3_Integration_into_Supplier_Contracts+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "3.3 Integration into Supplier Contracts",
      "question": "What did this company score for 3.3 Integration into Supplier Contracts in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_Purchasing_Practices.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_3_Integration_into_Supplier_Contracts+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8076449,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+3.1 Purchasing Practices+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_1_Purchasing_Practices+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "3.1 Purchasing Practices",
      "question": "What did this company score for 3.1 Purchasing Practices in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_Purchasing_Practices.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_1_Purchasing_Practices+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8076454,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+3.2 Supplier Selection+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_2_Supplier_Selection+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "3.2 Supplier Selection",
      "question": "What did this company score for 3.2 Supplier Selection in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_Purchasing_Practices.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_2_Supplier_Selection+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8077988,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+2.2 Risk Assessment+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+2_2_Risk_Assessment+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "2.2 Risk Assessment",
      "question": "What did this company score for 2.2 Risk Assessment in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+2_Traceability_and_Risk_Assessment.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+2_2_Risk_Assessment+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8078021,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+2.1 Traceability and Supply Chain Transparency+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+2_1_Traceability_and_Supply_Chain_Transparency+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "2.1 Traceability and Supply Chain Transparency",
      "question": "What did this company score for 2.1 Traceability and Supply Chain Transparency in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+2_Traceability_and_Risk_Assessment.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+2_1_Traceability_and_Supply_Chain_Transparency+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8078088,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+1.5 Stakeholder Engagement+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_5_Stakeholder_Engagement+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "1.5 Stakeholder Engagement",
      "question": "What did this company score for 1.5 Stakeholder Engagement in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_Commitment_Governance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_5_Stakeholder_Engagement+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8078097,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+1.3 Management and Accountability+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_3_Management_and_Accountability+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "1.3 Management and Accountability",
      "question": "What did this company score for 1.3 Management and Accountability in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_Commitment_Governance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_3_Management_and_Accountability+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8078102,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+1.4 Training+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_4_Training+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "1.4 Training",
      "question": "What did this company score for 1.4 Training in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_Commitment_Governance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_4_Training+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8079171,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+1. Commitment & Governance",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_Commitment_Governance.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "1. Commitment & Governance",
      "question": "What did this company score for 1. Commitment & Governance in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8076372",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8079233",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8078097",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8078102",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8078088",
          "weight": "20.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+KnowTheChain_Final_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_Commitment_Governance+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8079178,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+2. Traceability and Risk Assessment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+2_Traceability_and_Risk_Assessment.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "2. Traceability and Risk Assessment",
      "question": "What did this company score for 2. Traceability and Risk Assessment in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8078021",
          "weight": "50.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8077988",
          "weight": "50.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+KnowTheChain_Final_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+2_Traceability_and_Risk_Assessment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8079185,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+3. Purchasing Practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_Purchasing_Practices.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "3. Purchasing Practices",
      "question": "What did this company score for 3. Purchasing Practices in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8076449",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8076454",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8076444",
          "weight": "33.33"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+KnowTheChain_Final_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+3_Purchasing_Practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8079192,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+4. Recruitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_Recruitment.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "4. Recruitment",
      "question": "What did this company score for 4. Recruitment in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8076439",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8076434",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8076424",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8076429",
          "weight": "25.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+KnowTheChain_Final_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+4_Recruitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8079199,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+5. Worker Voice",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_Worker_Voice.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "5. Worker Voice",
      "question": "What did this company score for 5. Worker Voice in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8076419",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8076414",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8076404",
          "weight": "33.33"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+KnowTheChain_Final_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+5_Worker_Voice+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8079206,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+6. Monitoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+6_Monitoring.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "6. Monitoring",
      "question": "What did this company score for 6. Monitoring in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8076409",
          "weight": "50.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8076399",
          "weight": "50.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+KnowTheChain_Final_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+6_Monitoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8079227,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+7. Remedy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+7_Remedy.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "7. Remedy",
      "question": "What did this company score for 7. Remedy in the KnowTheChain benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8076394",
          "weight": "50.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8076389",
          "weight": "50.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+KnowTheChain_Final_Score_2020.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+7_Remedy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8079233,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+1.2 Supplier Code of Conduct+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_2_Supplier_Code_of_Conduct+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "1.2 Supplier Code of Conduct",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_Commitment_Governance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+1_2_Supplier_Code_of_Conduct+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8079317,
      "name": "KnowTheChain+KnowTheChain Final Score 2020",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+KnowTheChain_Final_Score_2020.json",
      "designer": "KnowTheChain",
      "title": "KnowTheChain Final Score 2020",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in KnowTheChain 2020? ",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8079171",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8079178",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8079185",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8079192",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8079199",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8079206",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8079227",
          "weight": "14.29"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/KnowTheChain+KnowTheChain_Final_Score_2020+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8079652,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Governance Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Governance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Governance Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What is the company's rating on disclosure of governance indicators?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">This rating </span><span style=\"font-size: 16px; font-weight: bolder;\">assesses the availability of corporate data </span><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">for the largest 100 apparel companies across nearly 40 indicators, sourced from a number of different projects on </span><a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 16px;\">Wikirate.org</a><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">. These indicators cover standard reporting measurements of </span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 16px;\">governance</span><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> performance, and focus on the </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">company's own, shareholder and supply chain policies, performance, and collaborations.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8039803",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8039741",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8039773",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8039788",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8039758",
          "weight": "20.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 193,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 99,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+ESG_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Governance_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8079667,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Social Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Social Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What is the company's rating on disclosure of social indicators?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This rating <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">assesses the availability of corporate data </span>for the largest 100 apparel companies across 85 indicators, sourced from a number of different projects on <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;\">Wikirate.org</a>. These indicators cover standard reporting measurements of <strong>social</strong> performance, and focus on the <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">company's own and supply chain policies, performance, and collaborations.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8062877",
          "weight": "23.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8062856",
          "weight": "23.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7615233",
          "weight": "23.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7615219",
          "weight": "23.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8039725",
          "weight": "8"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 187,
      "bookmarkers": 4,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 96,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+ESG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Business_substainbility_and_social_impact_Group+Seek_Limited_SDG8.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Social_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8080278,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Corporate Human Rights Benchmark Final Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Corporate_Human_Rights_Benchmark_Final_Score.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Corporate Human Rights Benchmark Final Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Business can create jobs and secure livelihoods, provide products and services, support community development and provide tax revenue for the state to invest in the well-being of its people.</p>\r\n<p>Yet, without a sound commitment to human rights and implementation through due diligence, jobs can be precarious with poverty wages, indigenous peoples can be dispossessed of their ancestral lands and individuals can be subjected to modern day slavery, amongst a range of other potential impacts.</p>\r\n<p>The <a href=\"https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/corporate-human-rights-benchmark/\" target=\"_blank\">Corporate Human Rights Benchmark</a> provides a comparative snapshot year-on-year of the largest companies on the planet, looking at the policies, processes, and practices they have in place to systematise their human rights approach and how they respond to serious allegations. This is a public good for all stakeholders.</p>\r\n<p>The ultimate aim of the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark will be achieved incrementally by adding new industries and companies over time.</p>\r\n<p>The <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Corporate Human Rights Benchmark</span> is an initiative of the <a href=\"https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/\" target=\"_blank\">World Benchmarking Alliance</a>. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\">The data and methodology in this metric should be used accordance with the WBA's <a href=\"https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/fair-use-donations/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: #e03e2d;\">fair-use donation model </a>and data licensing, under Creative Commons <a href=\"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: #e03e2d;\">Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The scores in this benchmark are calculcated by the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark team within the World Benchmarking Alliance. </p>\r\n<p>The methodology for the scoring and full dataset can be found <a href=\"https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/corporate-human-rights-benchmark/\" target=\"_blank\">on the World Benchmarking Alliance's website. </a></p>\r\n<p><em>Please note that the methodology for the benchmark is updated yearly. </em></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "out of 100 points",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Corporate_Human_Rights_Benchmark_Final_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8085540,
      "name": "Minerals Sourcing+Discloses Smelters and Refiners",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Discloses_Smelters_and_Refiners.json",
      "designer": "Minerals Sourcing",
      "title": "Discloses Smelters and Refiners",
      "question": "Does the company publish a list of the smelters/refiners they have identified in their supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var m5yes;\n\n  m5yes = [\"Yes\", \"Some\"];\n\n  if (m1 > 0 || m2 > 0 || m3 > 0 || m4 > 0 || m5yes.includes(m5)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~4316191",
          "not_researched": "0",
          "unknown": "0"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~4316768",
          "not_researched": "0",
          "unknown": "0"
        },
        {
          "name": "m3",
          "metric": "~4316889",
          "not_researched": "0",
          "unknown": "0"
        },
        {
          "name": "m4",
          "metric": "~3654379",
          "not_researched": "0",
          "unknown": "0"
        },
        {
          "name": "m5",
          "metric": "~840076",
          "not_researched": "NR"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 568,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 314,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Minerals_Sourcing+Discloses_Smelters_and_Refiners+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8085660,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Percentage of shareholders WDI signatory",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_shareholders_WDI_signatory.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Percentage of shareholders WDI signatory",
      "question": "What percentage of the companies known shareholders are signatories to the Workforce Disclosure Initiative?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var yesses;\n\n  yesses = disclosures.filter(function(a) {\n    return a === \"Yes\";\n  });\n\n  yesses.length / shareholders * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "company": "Commons+has Shareholder",
          "metric": "~3763177",
          "name": "disclosures"
        },
        {
          "year": "latest",
          "metric": "~4049109",
          "name": "shareholders"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 134,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 115,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Shareholder_Disclosure_Rate.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_shareholders_WDI_signatory+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8085834,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+ESG Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+ESG_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "ESG Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What is the company's score on disclosure of environmental, social and governance indicators?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This rating <strong>assesses the availability of corporate sustainability data </strong>for the largest 100 apparel companies across nearly 200 indicators, sourced from more than 25 different projects on Wikirate.org. These indicators cover standard reporting measurements of environmental, social and governance performance, and focus on the <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">company's own, shareholder and supply chain performance.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reputational Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7444942",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8079667",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8079652",
          "weight": "33.33"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 166,
      "bookmarkers": 6,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 96,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+ESG_Disclosure_Rate_Delta.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Ethan_McCutchen+test_delta.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+ESG_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8089032,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+Global Framework Agreement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Global_Framework_Agreement.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "Global Framework Agreement",
      "question": "Has this company signed a Global Framework Agreement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>To find out whether the company has signed a Global Framework Agreement, go to the IndustriALL website and search for the company in the 'Current Agreements' list. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 47,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 47,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Global_Framework_Agreement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8089465,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Migrant Workers Disclosed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Migrant_Workers_Disclosed.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Migrant Workers Disclosed",
      "question": "What is the percentage of migrant workers at the supplier company?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var value;\n\n  value = \"Unknown\";\n\n  if (isKnown(percentage_of_migrant_workers)) {\n    value = percentage_of_migrant_workers;\n  } else if (isKnown(number_of_workers) && isKnown(number_of_migrant_workers)) {\n    value = number_of_migrant_workers * 100 / number_of_workers;\n  }\n\n  if (value <= 100) {\n    value;\n  } else {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~4781556",
          "name": "percentage_of_migrant_workers"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~4780588",
          "name": "number_of_workers"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~12450421",
          "name": "number_of_migrant_workers"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 34470,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 21678,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_suppliers_with_proportion_of_migrant_workers_disclosed.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Migrant_Workers_Disclosed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8089792,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Male Supply Chain Workers Disclosed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Male_Supply_Chain_Workers_Disclosed.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Male Supply Chain Workers Disclosed",
      "question": "What is the percentage of male workers at the supplier company?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3233883"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 24204,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 17350,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_suppliers_with_proportion_of_male_workers_disclosed.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Male_Supply_Chain_Workers_Disclosed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8092924,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+IDH Living Wage Call to Action Signatory",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+IDH_Living_Wage_Call_to_Action_Signatory.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "IDH Living Wage Call to Action Signatory",
      "question": "Is the company a signatory of the IDH Living Wage Call to Action?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The IDH, Sustainable Trade Initiative launched a Call to Action to companies to join the effort to build a living wage economy. </p>\r\n<p>The signatory companies commit to the following ten actions: </p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Identifying living wage gaps in our own operations and supply chains, with a specific focus on the gender pay gap.</span></li>\r\n<li>Establishing shared frameworks with supply chain partners to close the gap, with concrete milestones.</li>\r\n<li>Joining in multi-stakeholder partnerships that target areas with large living wage gaps.</li>\r\n<li>Building awareness and understanding among consumers of how they contribute to better livelihoods.</li>\r\n<li>Implementing practical solutions to remove barriers and close living wage gaps and share costs in an equitable way.</li>\r\n<li>Supporting freedom of association with robust social dialogue and wage setting mechanisms.</li>\r\n<li>Adopting sustainable procurement and trading practices, including living wage requirements as part of commercial specifications, sourcing policies and/or contractual clauses/purchasing agreements.</li>\r\n<li>Ensuring that value created actually reaches workers.</li>\r\n<li>Transparently reporting on progress towards a living wage.</li>\r\n<li>Sharing learnings, challenges and solutions to inform and elevate all efforts as we find new pathways for reaching living wages.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.idhsustainabletrade.com/cta-living-wages/\">IDH, the Sustainable Trade Initiative</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The signatories are listed <a href=\"https://www.idhsustainabletrade.com/cta-living-wages/#companies\" target=\"_blank\">on the IDH website</a>. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Signatory List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+IDH_Living_Wage_Call_to_Action_Signatory+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8093374,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Female Supply Chain Workers Disclosed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Female_Supply_Chain_Workers_Disclosed.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Female Supply Chain Workers Disclosed",
      "question": "What is the percentage of female workers at the supplier company?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3233894"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 24640,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 17688,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_suppliers_with_proportion_of_female_workers_disclosed.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Female_Supply_Chain_Workers_Disclosed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8093394,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Supply Chain Workers Disclosed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Supply_Chain_Workers_Disclosed.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Supply Chain Workers Disclosed",
      "question": "What is the number of workers at the supplier company?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~4780588"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 24155,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 17397,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Percentage_of_supplier_with_number_of_workers_disclosed.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Supply_Chain_Workers_Disclosed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8104502,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+Number of Identified Fairtrade Certified Tea Suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Number_of_Identified_Fairtrade_Certified_Tea_Suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "Number of Identified Fairtrade Certified Tea Suppliers",
      "question": "What is the number of certified Fairtrade suppliers that could be identified from the company's supplier disclosure?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre's Tea Transparency Tracker project. </p>\r\n<p>Without supply chain transparency, workers don’t know where the tea they pick goes and remediation for abuses from forced labour to gender-based violence stop at the estate instead of going up the chain to where most of the value lies.  </p>\r\n<p>The Business &amp; Human Rights Resource Centre addressed this gap by approaching 65 companies with a request for them to disclose the estates and bought-leaf factories that they source their tea from, to be held centrally in the first Tea Transparency Tracker - hosted by Wikirate. We now have 3100+ estates and factories linked to 20 companies on the Tracker. </p>\r\n<p>A map of the tea supply chain and further information about the project can be found <a href=\"https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/from-us/tea-transparency-tracker/\">on the BHRRC's website.</a></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Suppliers",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var certified;\n\n  certified = [m1].flat().filter(function(a) {\n    return a === \"Certified\";\n  });\n\n  certified.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "company": "Commons+Tea Supplied By",
          "metric": "~8040244",
          "name": "m1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 21,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Number_of_Identified_Fairtrade_Certified_Tea_Suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8112359,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+Number of Identified Rainforest Alliance Certified Tea Suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Number_of_Identified_Rainforest_Alliance_Certified_Tea_Suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "Number of Identified Rainforest Alliance Certified Tea Suppliers",
      "question": "What is the number of suppliers certified by the Rainforest Alliance that could be identified from the company's supplier disclosure?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre's Tea Transparency Tracker project. </p>\r\n<p>Without supply chain transparency, workers don’t know where the tea they pick goes and remediation for abuses from forced labour to gender-based violence stop at the estate instead of going up the chain to where most of the value lies.  </p>\r\n<p>The Business &amp; Human Rights Resource Centre addressed this gap by approaching 65 companies with a request for them to disclose the estates and bought-leaf factories that they source their tea from, to be held centrally in the first Tea Transparency Tracker - hosted by Wikirate. We now have 3100+ estates and factories linked to 20 companies on the Tracker. </p>\r\n<p>A map of the tea supply chain and further information about the project can be found <a href=\"https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/from-us/tea-transparency-tracker/\">on the BHRRC's website.</a></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Suppliers",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  certifications.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "company": "Commons+Tea_Supplied_By",
          "metric": "~8040234",
          "name": "certifications"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Number_of_Identified_Rainforest_Alliance_Certified_Tea_Suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8115197,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Signatory Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Signatory_Workforce_Disclosure_Initiative_WDI.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Signatory Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI)",
      "question": "Is the company a signatory of the Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~3763177"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 608,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 601,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Signatory_Workforce_Disclosure_Initiative_WDI+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8119431,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+Fairtrade Suppliers (Suspended)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Fairtrade_Suppliers_Suspended.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "Fairtrade Suppliers (Suspended)",
      "question": "How many of the company's suppliers have the status 'Suspended' in the Fairtrade Certification programme? ",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre's Tea Transparency Tracker project. </p>\r\n<p>Without supply chain transparency, workers don’t know where the tea they pick goes and remediation for abuses from forced labour to gender-based violence stop at the estate instead of going up the chain to where most of the value lies.  </p>\r\n<p>The Business &amp; Human Rights Resource Centre addressed this gap by approaching 65 companies with a request for them to disclose the estates and bought-leaf factories that they source their tea from, to be held centrally in the first Tea Transparency Tracker - hosted by Wikirate. We now have 3100+ estates and factories linked to 20 companies on the Tracker. </p>\r\n<p>A map of the tea supply chain and further information about the project can be found <a href=\"https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/from-us/tea-transparency-tracker/\">on the BHRRC's website.</a></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Suppliers",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var suspended;\n\n  suspended = m1.filter(function(a) {\n    return a === \"Suspended\";\n  });\n\n  suspended.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "company": "Commons+Tea_Supplied_By",
          "metric": "~8040244",
          "name": "m1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 21,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Fairtrade_Suppliers_Suspended+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8133699,
      "name": "Rainforest Alliance+Rainforest Alliance Certification Status",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Rainforest_Alliance+Rainforest_Alliance_Certification_Status.json",
      "designer": "Rainforest Alliance",
      "title": "Rainforest Alliance Certification Status",
      "question": "What is the company's certification status in the Rainforest Alliance certification program? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Rainforest Alliance is an international non-profit organization working at the intersection of business, agriculture, and forests to make responsible business the new normal.</p>\r\n<p>Farms, forest communities, and businesses that participate in the RA certification program are audited against sustainability standards based on the triple bottom line: environmental, economic, and social well-being. More than two million farmers follow the RA agriculture standards in 70 countries around the globe. Our programs focus on coffee, cocoa, tea, bananas, and other commodity sectors facing urgent environmental and social challenges.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.rainforest-alliance.org/approach/\">rainforest-alliance.org</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The data in this metric reflects the Rainforest Alliance list of certified farms and CoC operations. The list can be found </span><a href=\"https://www.rainforest-alliance.org/business/certification/certificate-search-and-public-summaries/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 15.2px;\">here</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. </span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Active",
        "Suspended",
        "Cancelled"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 497,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 497,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Rainforest_Alliance_Cancelled.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Rainforest_Alliance_Suspended.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Rainforest_Alliance+Rainforest_Alliance_Certification_Status+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8145965,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+Rainforest Alliance (Cancelled)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Rainforest_Alliance_Cancelled.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "Rainforest Alliance (Cancelled)",
      "question": "<p>How many of the company's suppliers have the status 'Cancelled' in the Rainforest Alliance Certification programme? </p>",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre's Tea Transparency Tracker project. </p>\r\n<p>Without supply chain transparency, workers don’t know where the tea they pick goes and remediation for abuses from forced labour to gender-based violence stop at the estate instead of going up the chain to where most of the value lies.  </p>\r\n<p>The Business &amp; Human Rights Resource Centre addressed this gap by approaching 65 companies with a request for them to disclose the estates and bought-leaf factories that they source their tea from, to be held centrally in the first Tea Transparency Tracker - hosted by Wikirate. We now have 3100+ estates and factories linked to 20 companies on the Tracker. </p>\r\n<p>A map of the tea supply chain and further information about the project can be found <a href=\"https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/from-us/tea-transparency-tracker/\">on the BHRRC's website.</a></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var cancelled;\n\n  cancelled = m1.filter(function(a) {\n    return a === \"Cancelled\";\n  });\n\n  cancelled.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "company": "Commons+Tea_Supplied_By",
          "metric": "~8133699",
          "name": "m1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Rainforest_Alliance_Cancelled+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8158479,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+Owner of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Owner_of.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "Owner of",
      "question": "Which tea suppliers does this company own?",
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre's Tea Transparency Tracker project. </p>\r\n<p>Without supply chain transparency, workers don’t know where the tea they pick goes and remediation for abuses from forced labour to gender-based violence stop at the estate instead of going up the chain to where most of the value lies.  </p>\r\n<p>The Business &amp; Human Rights Resource Centre addressed this gap by approaching 65 companies with a request for them to disclose the estates and bought-leaf factories that they source their tea from, to be held centrally in the first Tea Transparency Tracker - hosted by Wikirate. We now have 3100+ estates and factories linked to 20 companies on the Tracker. </p>\r\n<p>A map of the tea supply chain and further information about the project can be found <a href=\"https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/from-us/tea-transparency-tracker/\">on the BHRRC's website.</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This data was collected through a survey of tea companies and a request for supply chain disclosure. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "",
      "range": "",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 523,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 523,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Owner_of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8158489,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+Owned by",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Owned_by.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "Owned by",
      "question": "Which company owns this tea supplier?",
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1491,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1491,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Owned_by+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8158781,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+Rainforest Alliance (Suspended)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Rainforest_Alliance_Suspended.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "Rainforest Alliance (Suspended)",
      "question": "How many of the company's suppliers have the status 'Suspended' in the Rainforest Alliance certification programme? ",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre's Tea Transparency Tracker project. </p>\r\n<p>Without supply chain transparency, workers don’t know where the tea they pick goes and remediation for abuses from forced labour to gender-based violence stop at the estate instead of going up the chain to where most of the value lies.  </p>\r\n<p>The Business &amp; Human Rights Resource Centre addressed this gap by approaching 65 companies with a request for them to disclose the estates and bought-leaf factories that they source their tea from, to be held centrally in the first Tea Transparency Tracker - hosted by Wikirate. We now have 3100+ estates and factories linked to 20 companies on the Tracker. </p>\r\n<p>A map of the tea supply chain and further information about the project can be found <a href=\"https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/from-us/tea-transparency-tracker/\">on the BHRRC's website.</a></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var suspended;\n\n  suspended = m1.filter(function(a) {\n    return a === \"Suspended\";\n  });\n\n  suspended.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "company": "Commons+Tea_Supplied_By",
          "metric": "~8133699",
          "name": "m1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Rainforest_Alliance_Suspended+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8171094,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Corporate Human Rights Benchmark UNGP Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Corporate_Human_Rights_Benchmark_UNGP_Score.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Corporate Human Rights Benchmark UNGP Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for the UNGP indicators in the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Business can create jobs and secure livelihoods, provide products and services, support community development and provide tax revenue for the state to invest in the well-being of its people.</p>\r\n<p>Yet, without a sound commitment to human rights and implementation through due diligence, jobs can be precarious with poverty wages, indigenous peoples can be dispossessed of their ancestral lands and individuals can be subjected to modern day slavery, amongst a range of other potential impacts.</p>\r\n<p>The <a href=\"https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/corporate-human-rights-benchmark/\" target=\"_blank\">Corporate Human Rights Benchmark</a> provides a comparative snapshot year-on-year of the largest companies on the planet, looking at the policies, processes, and practices they have in place to systematise their human rights approach and how they respond to serious allegations. This is a public good for all stakeholders.</p>\r\n<p>The ultimate aim of the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark will be achieved incrementally by adding new industries and companies over time.</p>\r\n<p>The <span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Corporate Human Rights Benchmark</span> is an initiative of the <a href=\"https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/\" target=\"_blank\">World Benchmarking Alliance</a>. </p>\r\n<p>In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated impacts around the world, the apparel, agricultural product, extractive and ICT manufacturing companies, which were assessed in previous iterations of the benchmark, were only assessed on a subset of the methodology in 2020, namely the CHRB core UNGP indicators. These are 13 non-industry specific indicators that focus on three key areas of the UNGPs: high-level commitments, human rights due diligence and access to remedy.</p>\r\n<p><strong>This metric compiles the company scores out of 26 points on the UNGP indicators.  </strong></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\">The data and methodology in this metric should be used accordance with the WBA's <a href=\"https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/fair-use-donations/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: #e03e2d;\">fair-use donation model </a>and data licensing, under Creative Commons <a href=\"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: #e03e2d;\">Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The UNGP scores are calculcated by the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark team within the World Benchmarking Alliance. </p>\r\n<p>The methodology for the scoring and full dataset can be found <a href=\"https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/corporate-human-rights-benchmark/\" target=\"_blank\">on the World Benchmarking Alliance's website. </a></p>\r\n<p><em>Please note that the methodology for the benchmark is updated yearly. </em></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "out of 26 points",
      "range": "0-26",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 392,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 203,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Corporate_Human_Rights_Benchmark_UNGP_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8218654,
      "name": "Home Office+MS Statement Includes Org Structure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Includes_Org_Structure.json",
      "designer": "Home Office",
      "title": "MS Statement Includes Org Structure",
      "question": "Did the company report in the UK Modern Slavery Registry portal, that its modern slavery statement includes information about its organizational structure?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 51888,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 21711,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Includes_Org_Structure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8218664,
      "name": "Home Office+MS Statement Includes Policies",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Includes_Policies.json",
      "designer": "Home Office",
      "title": "MS Statement Includes Policies",
      "question": "Did the company report in the UK Modern Slavery Registry portal, that its modern slavery statement includes information about policies?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55329,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 21756,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Includes_Policies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8218674,
      "name": "Home Office+MS Statement Includes Risks Assessment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Includes_Risks_Assessment.json",
      "designer": "Home Office",
      "title": "MS Statement Includes Risks Assessment",
      "question": "Did the company report in the UK Modern Slavery Registry portal, that its modern slavery statement includes information about conducting a risk assessment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55836,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 21761,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Includes_Risks_Assessment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8218684,
      "name": "Home Office+MS Statement Includes Due Diligence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Includes_Due_Diligence.json",
      "designer": "Home Office",
      "title": "MS Statement Includes Due Diligence",
      "question": "Did the company report in the UK Modern Slavery Registry portal, that its modern slavery statement includes information about conducting due diligence?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55851,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 21758,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Includes_Due_Diligence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8218694,
      "name": "Home Office+MS Statement Includes Training",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Includes_Training.json",
      "designer": "Home Office",
      "title": "MS Statement Includes Training",
      "question": "Did the company report in the UK Modern Slavery Registry portal, that its modern slavery statement includes information about conducting trainings?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55855,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 21759,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Includes_Training+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8218704,
      "name": "Home Office+MS Statement Includes Goals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Includes_Goals.json",
      "designer": "Home Office",
      "title": "MS Statement Includes Goals",
      "question": "Did the company report in the UK Modern Slavery Registry portal, that its modern slavery statement includes information about its goals on modern slavery?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 52737,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 21715,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Includes_Goals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8218714,
      "name": "Home Office+Organisation Sectors",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+Organisation_Sectors.json",
      "designer": "Home Office",
      "title": "Organisation Sectors",
      "question": "Which organizational sector(s) has the company been assigned in the UK Modern Slavery Registry?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Automotive/ machinery and heavy electrical equipment",
        "Charitable / not-for-profit activities",
        "Cleaning and security services",
        "Construction/ civil engineering and building products",
        "Consumer services/ including accommodation/ hospitality/ tourism and leisure",
        "Cosmetics and toiletries",
        "Defence and aerospace",
        "Durable consumer goods/ including electronics and appliances/ home furnishings and other accessories",
        "Education and research",
        "Fashion/ textiles/ apparel and luxury goods",
        "Financial/ insurance and real estate activities",
        "Food and beverages/ agriculture and fishing",
        "Forestry/ timber products/ paper and containers and packaging",
        "Healthcare and pharmaceuticals",
        "Information technology and telecommunication",
        "Media/ publishing/ arts and entertainment",
        "Mining/ metals/ chemicals and resources (including oil and gas)",
        "Professional and administrative services and supplies/ including legal/ consulting and accounting services",
        "Public sector",
        "Transportation/ logistics/ and storage",
        "Utilities gas/ water and electricity",
        "Waste management and recycling",
        "Other"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 13750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6427,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Sector.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Garment_Sector.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Hospitality_Sector.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Financial_Services_Sector.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Food_Beverages_Sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+Organisation_Sectors+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8218724,
      "name": "Home Office+Turnover (range)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+Turnover_range.json",
      "designer": "Home Office",
      "title": "Turnover (range)",
      "question": "Which turnover range has the company been assign in the UK Modern Slavery Registry?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Under £36 million",
        "£36 million to £60 million",
        "£60 million to £100 million",
        "£100 million to £500 million",
        "Over £500 million"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 15460,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6490,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_reporting_threshold.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Company_size.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+Turnover_range+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8218912,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+Percentage of Tea Supply Chain Disclosed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Percentage_of_Tea_Supply_Chain_Disclosed.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "Percentage of Tea Supply Chain Disclosed",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's tea supply chain was disclosed in their sourcing disclosure? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre's Tea Transparency Tracker project. </p>\r\n<p>Without supply chain transparency, workers don’t know where the tea they pick goes and remediation for abuses from forced labour to gender-based violence stop at the estate instead of going up the chain to where most of the value lies.  </p>\r\n<p>The Business &amp; Human Rights Resource Centre addressed this gap by approaching 65 companies with a request for them to disclose the estates and bought-leaf factories that they source their tea from, to be held centrally in the first Tea Transparency Tracker - hosted by Wikirate. We now have 3100+ estates and factories linked to 20 companies on the Tracker. </p>\r\n<p>A map of the tea supply chain and further information about the project can be found <a href=\"https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/from-us/tea-transparency-tracker/\">on the BHRRC's website.</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This data was collected through a survey of tea companies and a request for supply chain disclosure. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Percentage_of_Tea_Supply_Chain_Disclosed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8228714,
      "name": "Australian Border Force+Revenue (range)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Australian_Border_Force+Revenue_range.json",
      "designer": "Australian Border Force",
      "title": "Revenue (range)",
      "question": "Which revenue range (AUD) has the company been assign in the AUS Modern Slavery Register?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "AU$ 0-99M",
        "AU$ 100-150M",
        "AU$ 150-200M",
        "AU$ 200-250M",
        "AU$ 250-300M",
        "AU$ 300-350M",
        "AU$ 350-400M",
        "AU$ 400-450M",
        "AU$ 450-500M",
        "AU$ 500-600M",
        "AU$ 600-700M",
        "AU$ 700-800M",
        "AU$ 800-900M",
        "AU$ 900M-1BN",
        "AU$ 1BN+"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7554,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2801,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_reporting_threshold.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Company_size.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Australian_Border_Force+Revenue_range+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8228797,
      "name": "Australian Border Force+Industry Sectors",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Australian_Border_Force+Industry_Sectors.json",
      "designer": "Australian Border Force",
      "title": "Industry Sectors",
      "question": "Which industry sector(s) has the company been assigned in the AUS Modern Slavery Register?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Automotive/ machinery and heavy electrical equipment",
        "Charitable / not-for-profit activities",
        "Cleaning and security services",
        "Consumer services/ including accommodation/ hospitality/ tourism and leisure",
        "Construction/ civil engineering and building products",
        "Cosmetics and toiletries",
        "Defence and aerospace",
        "Durable consumer goods/ including electronics and appliances/ home furnishings and other accessories",
        "Education and research",
        "Fashion/ textiles/ apparel and luxury goods",
        "Financial/ insurance and real estate activities",
        "Food and beverages/ agriculture and fishing",
        "Forestry/ timber products/ paper and containers and packaging",
        "Healthcare and pharmaceuticals",
        "Information technology and telecommunication",
        "Media/ publishing/ arts and entertainment",
        "Mining/ metals/ chemicals and resources (including oil and gas)",
        "Professional and administrative services and supplies/ including legal/ consulting and accounting services",
        "Transportation/ logistics/ and storage",
        "Utilities gas/ water and electricity",
        "Waste management and recycling",
        "Other"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6306,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2797,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Sector.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Garment_Sector.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Hospitality_Sector.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Financial_Services_Sector.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Food_Beverages_Sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Australian_Border_Force+Industry_Sectors+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8228826,
      "name": "Australian Border Force+Overseas Reporting Obligations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Australian_Border_Force+Overseas_Reporting_Obligations.json",
      "designer": "Australian Border Force",
      "title": "Overseas Reporting Obligations",
      "question": "Which overseas reporting obligations has the company disclosed it has in the AUS Modern Slavery Register?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "United Kingdom Modern Slavery Act 2015",
        "California Transparency in Supply Chains Act 2010",
        "French Corporate Duty of Vigilance Law 2017",
        "Netherlands Child Labour Due Diligence Law 2019",
        "German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act 2021",
        "NSW Modern Slavery Act 2018",
        "Norway Transparency Act 2021",
        "Canada Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act 2023"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5403,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2920,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Australian_Border_Force+Overseas_Reporting_Obligations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8394513,
      "name": "Home Office+MS Statement Policies Provisions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Policies_Provisions.json",
      "designer": "Home Office",
      "title": "MS Statement Policies Provisions",
      "question": "In the UK Modern Slavery Registry portal, which provisions did the company disclose as being part of their modern slavery policies (in relation to its domestic and international supply chains, as well as its own operations)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>None = when the company disclosed not covering any policy provisions in their MS statement</p>\r\n<p>Unknown = when the company did not provide an answer for this question in the UK Registry</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Freedom of workers to terminate employment",
        "Freedom of movement",
        "Freedom of association",
        "Prohibits any threat of violence/ harassment and intimidation",
        "Prohibits the use of worker-paid recruitment fees",
        "Prohibits compulsory overtime",
        "Prohibits child labour",
        "Prohibits discrimination",
        "Prohibits confiscation of workers original identification documents",
        "Provides access to remedy/ compensation and justice for victims of modern slavery",
        "Other",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 17993,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9767,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Policies_Provisions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8395018,
      "name": "Walk Free+Mention of sex trafficking or exploitation (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Mention_of_sex_trafficking_or_exploitation_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Mention of sex trafficking or exploitation (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the company, in its modern slavery statement, discuss the risk of sexual exploitation or trafficking in its operations and/or supply chains?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span class=\"\"\" dir=\"ltr\" style=\"left: 118.116px; top: 655.593px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.936098);\" role=\"presentation\"\" style=\"left: 118.116px; top: 655.593px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.936098);\">Hotels can also be the venue or transit location for forced sexual </span><span style=\"left: 118.116px; top: 675.593px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.937996);\">exploitation of adults and children. In the US, there are reports of third </span><span class=\"\"\" dir=\"ltr\" style=\"left: 118.116px; top: 695.593px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.94342);\" role=\"presentation\"\" style=\"left: 118.116px; top: 695.593px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.94342);\">parties renting rooms, “selling” victims, forcing victims into sexual acts </span><span style=\"left: 118.116px; top: 715.593px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.909641);\">for financial gain, or having victims meet potential clients in hotels.* </span><span style=\"left: 118.109px; top: 735.601px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.921284);\">A 2015 report by Polaris identified 1,434 cases of trafficking in hotels </span><span style=\"left: 118.109px; top: 755.601px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.927646);\">and motels in the US between December 2007 and February 2015. </span><span style=\"left: 118.109px; top: 775.601px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.920593);\">From these cases, 1,867 victims were identified, 92 percent of whom </span><span class=\"\"\" dir=\"ltr\" style=\"left: 118.109px; top: 795.601px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.929014);\" role=\"presentation\"\" style=\"left: 118.109px; top: 795.601px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.929014);\">had experienced sex trafficking, five percent labour trafficking, and </span><span style=\"left: 118.109px; top: 815.601px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.926671);\">two percent had experienced both. Ninety-four percent were female.**</span></p>\r\n<p>* ECPAT USA 2017. “No Vacancy for Child Sex Traf f ickers Impact Repor t.” Available from: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/594970e91b631b3571be12e2/t/59c9b6bf b07869cc5d792b8c/1506391761747/NoVacany_Repor t.pdf. [23 August 2019].</p>\r\n<p>** Polaris 2015, “Human Trafficking the Hotel Industry”. Available from: https://polarisproject.org /sites/default/f iles/human-trafficking-hotel-industry-recommendations.pdf. [23 August 2019].</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Read the content of the statement and select:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Yes- If the company makes reference to the risk of sexual explotation/trafficking in its operations and/or supply chains?</li>\r\n<li>No- If the company makes reference to the risk of sexual explotation/trafficking in its operations and/or supply chains?</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>For each value, please include a comment that copies relevant information and page numbers from the statement.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 213,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 76,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Mention_of_sex_trafficking_or_exploitation_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8395721,
      "name": "Home Office+MS Statement Training Provisions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Training_Provisions.json",
      "designer": "Home Office",
      "title": "MS Statement Training Provisions",
      "question": "In the UK Modern Slavery Registry portal, which types of training did the company disclose as being covered in their modern slavery statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>None = when the company disclosed not covering any policy provisions in their MS statement</p>\r\n<p>Unknown = when the company did not provide an answer for this question in the UK Registry</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Whole organization",
        "Front line staff",
        "Human resources",
        "Executive-level staff",
        "Procurement staff",
        "Suppliers",
        "Wider community",
        "None",
        "Other"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20532,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10414,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Training_Provisions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8395846,
      "name": "Walk Free+ITP Membership (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+ITP_Membership_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "ITP Membership (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose that it is part of the International Tourism Partnership (ITP)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span class=\"\"\" dir=\"ltr\" style=\"left: 118.11px; top: 536.704px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.926662);\" role=\"presentation\"\" style=\"left: 118.11px; top: 536.704px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.926662);\">The International Tourism Partnership (ITP), </span><span style=\"left: 118.11px; top: 556.704px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.933405);\">an industry association that supports the principles outlined in the UN </span><span class=\"\"\" dir=\"ltr\" style=\"left: 118.11px; top: 576.704px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.909893);\" role=\"presentation\"\" style=\"left: 118.11px; top: 576.704px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.909893);\">Declaration of Human Rights and the UNGPs. The ITP has developed </span><span style=\"left: 118.11px; top: 596.704px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.909006);\">a Human Trafficking Position Statement, a Know How Guide, and </span><span class=\"\"\" dir=\"ltr\" style=\"left: 118.11px; top: 616.704px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.91442);\" role=\"presentation\"\" style=\"left: 118.11px; top: 616.704px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.91442);\">Guidelines for Checking Recruitment Agencies.* More recently the ITP </span><span style=\"left: 118.109px; top: 636.703px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.922588);\">has developed three key Principles on Forced Labour: that every worker </span><span style=\"left: 118.109px; top: 656.703px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.913862);\">should have freedom of movement, no worker should pay for a job, and </span><span style=\"left: 118.109px; top: 676.703px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.912133);\">no worker should be indebted or coerced to work.**</span></p>\r\n<p>* International Tourism Par tnership 2019, “Human Rights”. Available from: https://www.tourismpartnership.org/human-rights//. [16 September 2019].</p>\r\n<p>** International Tourism Par tnership 2019, “News”. Available from: https://www.tourismpartnership.org/blog/itp-launches-principles-on-forced-labour/. [16 September 2019].</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Read the statment and identify wether the company is member of the ITP.</p>\r\n<p>Select Yes if the company is a member of the ITP.</p>\r\n<p>Select No if there is no information about the company being a member of the ITP.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Philanthropy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 163,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 76,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+ITP_Membership_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8396326,
      "name": "Home Office+MS Statement Working Conditions Engagement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Working_Conditions_Engagement.json",
      "designer": "Home Office",
      "title": "MS Statement Working Conditions Engagement",
      "question": "In the UK Modern Slavery Registry portal, which types of working conditions engagement did the company disclose as being covered in their modern slavery statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>None = when the company disclosed not covering any working conditions engagements in their MS statement</p>\r\n<p>Unknown = when the company did not provide an answer for this question in the UK Registry</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Suppliers",
        "Trade unions or worker representative groups",
        "Civil society organisations",
        "Professional auditors",
        "Workers within own organization",
        "Workers within supply chain",
        "Central or local government",
        "Law enforcement/ GLAA and other local labour market inspectorates",
        "Businesses in the industry or sector",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19641,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10071,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Working_Conditions_Engagement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8396423,
      "name": "Home Office+MS Statement Social Audit Provisions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Social_Audit_Provisions.json",
      "designer": "Home Office",
      "title": "MS Statement Social Audit Provisions",
      "question": "In the UK Modern Slavery Registry portal, which types of social audit did the company disclose as being covered in their modern slavery statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>None = when the company disclosed not covering any social audit provisions in their MS statement</p>\r\n<p>Unknown = when the company did not provide an answer for this question in the UK Registry</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Audit conducted by own staff",
        "Third party audit arranged by own organization",
        "Audit conducted by suppliers staff",
        "Third party audit arranged by supplier",
        "Announced audit",
        "Unannounced audit",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 19283,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9959,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Social_Audit_Provisions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8396438,
      "name": "Home Office+MS Statement Grievance Mechanism Provisions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Grievance_Mechanism_Provisions.json",
      "designer": "Home Office",
      "title": "MS Statement Grievance Mechanism Provisions",
      "question": "In the UK Modern Slavery Registry portal, which grievance mechanism(s) for workers to report concerns or complaints did the company disclose as being covered in their modern slavery statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>None = when the company disclosed not covering any grievance mechanism provisions in their MS statement</p>\r\n<p>Unknown = when the company did not provide an answer for this question in the UK Registry</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Using anonymous whistleblowing services such as a helpline or mobile phone app",
        "Through trade unions or other worker representative groups",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20171,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10203,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+MS_Statement_Grievance_Mechanism_Provisions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8396509,
      "name": "Home Office+ILO Indicators in MS Statement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+ILO_Indicators_in_MS_Statement.json",
      "designer": "Home Office",
      "title": "ILO Indicators in MS Statement",
      "question": "In the UK Modern Slavery Registry portal, which ILO indicators of forced labour did the company disclose as being covered in their modern slavery statement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>None = when the company disclosed not covering any ILO indicators of forced labor in their MS statement</p>\r\n<p>Unknown = when the company did not provide an answer for this question in the UK Registry</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Abuse of vulnerability",
        "Deception",
        "Restriction of movement",
        "Isolation",
        "Physical and sexual violence",
        "Intimidation and threats",
        "Retention of identity documents",
        "Withholding of wages",
        "Debt bondage",
        "Abusive working and living conditions",
        "Excessive overtime",
        "Other",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 17119,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9138,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+ILO_Indicators_in_MS_Statement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8396519,
      "name": "Home Office+Response to ILO indicator findings in MS Statement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+Response_to_ILO_indicator_findings_in_MS_Statement.json",
      "designer": "Home Office",
      "title": "Response to ILO indicator findings in MS Statement",
      "question": "In the UK Modern Slavery Registry portal, did the company disclose that in their modern slavery statement they cover any actions they took after finding ILO indicators of forced labour?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>None = when the company disclosed not covering any actions in response to ILO force labor indicator findings in their MS statement</p>\r\n<p>Unknown = when the company did not provide an answer for this question in the UK Registry</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Financial remediation including repayment of recruitment fees",
        "Change in policy",
        "Change in training",
        "Referring potential victims to government services",
        "Supporting victims via NGO",
        "Supporting investigations by relevant authorities",
        "Other",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2984,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1916,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Home_Office+Response_to_ILO_indicator_findings_in_MS_Statement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8396561,
      "name": "Walk Free+Agency Labor (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Agency_Labor_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Agency Labor (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose, in its modern slavery statement, any considerations with regards to agency labor in their (supply chain) workforce?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<div>\r\n<p>Read the statment and identify whether the company discloses, in its modern slavery statement, any considerations with regards to agency labor in their (supply chain) workforce.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</div>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 97,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 73,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Agency_Labor_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8396572,
      "name": "Walk Free+Migrant Workers (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Migrant_Workers_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Migrant Workers (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose, in its modern slavery statement, any considerations with regards to migrant workers in their (supply chain) workforce?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<div>\r\n<p>Read the statment and identify whether the company discloses, in its modern slavery statement, any considerations with regards to migrant workers in their (supply chain) workforce.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</div>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 97,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 73,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Migrant_Workers_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8412181,
      "name": "Walk Free+Employee dialogue (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Employee_dialogue_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Employee dialogue (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the company mention engaging directly in dialogue with suppliers’ workers at one or more levels of the supply chain (raw materials, textiles, manufacturing) as part of their due diligence? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Beyond providing avenues for raising grievances, for example through a whistleblowing mechanism, garment brands should be providing avenues for worker voice and worker representation throughout its supply chain.</p>\r\n<p style=\"mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;\"><span style=\"mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-AU; mso-fareast-language: EN-AU;\">This metric was devised by Walk Free and Wikirate, and is part of a project assessing Modern Slavery Act statements produced by garment companies in the UK and Australia. More on the project can be found <a href=\"/Research_MSA_AUS_and_UK_apparel_companies\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;\">To meet this metric, companies must disclose that it has engaged in dialogue with supply chain workers or with groups representing supply chain workers.</p>\r\n<p style=\"mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;\">Engaging dialogue can mean one or more of the following:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">through worker interviews</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">mobile surveys</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;\">engaging with labour unions</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; line-height: normal;\"><span style=\"mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-AU; mso-fareast-language: EN-AU;\">If the company discloses that it has engaged in dialogue with supply chain workers or worker groups, please indicate <strong>“Yes”</strong>, and provide details.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;\"><span style=\"mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-AU; mso-fareast-language: EN-AU;\">If no action exists or is described in the statement, please select <strong>\"No\"</strong>.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">If yes, in your comment please add the relevant section of the statement, including what form of engagement the company discloses.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "In development"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 187,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 101,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Employee_dialogue_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8412610,
      "name": "Walk Free+Supply chain wages (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Supply_chain_wages_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Supply chain wages (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose that they provide living wage to workers in their supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Low and underpayment of wages are an indicator of forced labour. Due to fast turnaround times, and low costs of clothing, low wages can be common in the garment industry.</p>\r\n<p style=\"mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;\"><span style=\"mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-AU; mso-fareast-language: EN-AU;\">This metric was devised by Walk Free and Wikirate, and is part of a project assessing Modern Slavery Act statements produced by garment companies in the UK and Australia. More on the project can be found <a href=\"/Research_MSA_AUS_and_UK_apparel_companies\">here</a>.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;\">To meet this metric, companies must disclose that it has made commitments, or taken action, to <strong>tackle low or underpayment of wages in their supply chains</strong>.</p>\r\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0cm; text-align: justify; line-height: normal;\">This can include:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: normal;\"><span style=\"text-indent: -18pt; font-size: 1rem;\">Commitment to paying living wage or fair wages</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: normal;\"><span style=\"text-indent: -18pt; font-size: 1rem;\">Action plan to pay living wage</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: normal;\"><span style=\"text-indent: -18pt; font-size: 1rem;\">Number of suppliers where living wage is paid</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: normal;\"><span style=\"text-indent: -18pt; font-size: 1rem;\">% of suppliers that have committed to pay living wage</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0cm; text-align: justify; line-height: normal;\"> </p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">These must be general commitments outside of commitments made in direct response to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\r\n<p style=\"mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; line-height: normal;\"><span style=\"mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-AU; mso-fareast-language: EN-AU;\">If the company discloses that it has made these commitments, or taken these actions to ensure that supply chain workers are paid a fair wage, please indicate <strong>“Yes”</strong>, and provide details.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;\"><span style=\"mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-AU; mso-fareast-language: EN-AU;\">If no action exists or is described in the statement, please select <strong>\"No\"</strong>.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">If yes, in your comment please add the relevant section of the statement, including what type of information on supply chain workers’ wages is disclosed.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</strong></span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April </strong>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 187,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 101,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Supply_chain_wages_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8674635,
      "name": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service+Median Gender Pay Gap (Hourly Pay)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Median_Gender_Pay_Gap_Hourly_Pay.json",
      "designer": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service",
      "title": "Median Gender Pay Gap (Hourly Pay)",
      "question": "What is the difference between the median hourly rate of pay for female employees and the median hourly rate of pay for male employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is  based on the UK legislation requiring disclosure of gender pay gaps by companies based in the UK: [[https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2017/9780111152010|The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017]].<br>\n<br>\nData for this metric only comes from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]], and as such it only concerns the performance of UK-based companies. Where this metric is applied to the performance of a multi-national company based outside the UK, the answer relates to the performance of some UK-based subsidiary (see the source for details).",
      "methodology": "The data for this metric is taken from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]].<br>\n<br>\nFrom the legislation:<br>\n<br>\n2.—(1) A relevant employer must publish, for 2017 and each subsequent year, the following information—<br>\n<br>\n(a)the difference between the mean hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 8);<br>\n<br>\n(b)the difference between the median hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 9);<br>\n<br>\n(c)the difference between the mean bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 10);<br>\n<br>\n(d)the difference between the median bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 11);<br>\n<br>\n(e)the proportions of male and female relevant employees who were paid bonus pay (see regulation 12); and<br>\n<br>\n(f)the proportions of male and female full-pay relevant employees in the lower, lower middle, upper middle and upper quartile pay bands (see regulation 13).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Gender Pay Gap Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 63119,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Median_Gender_Pay_Gap_Hourly_Pay.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Median_Hourly_Pay_Equality_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Median_Gender_Pay_Gap_Hourly_Pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8674646,
      "name": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service+Mean Gender Pay Gap (Bonus Pay)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Mean_Gender_Pay_Gap_Bonus_Pay.json",
      "designer": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service",
      "title": "Mean Gender Pay Gap (Bonus Pay)",
      "question": "What is the difference between the mean bonus pay for female employees and the mean bonus pay for male employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is  based on the UK legislation requiring disclosure of gender pay gaps by companies based in the UK: [[https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2017/9780111152010|The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017]].<br>\n<br>\nData for this metric only comes from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]], and as such it only concerns the performance of UK-based companies. Where this metric is applied to the performance of a multi-national company based outside the UK, the answer relates to the performance of some UK-based subsidiary (see the source for details).",
      "methodology": "The data for this metric is taken from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]].<br>\n<br>\nFrom the legislation:<br>\n<br>\n2.—(1) A relevant employer must publish, for 2017 and each subsequent year, the following information—<br>\n<br>\n(a)the difference between the mean hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 8);<br>\n<br>\n(b)the difference between the median hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 9);<br>\n<br>\n(c)the difference between the mean bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 10);<br>\n<br>\n(d)the difference between the median bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 11);<br>\n<br>\n(e)the proportions of male and female relevant employees who were paid bonus pay (see regulation 12); and<br>\n<br>\n(f)the proportions of male and female full-pay relevant employees in the lower, lower middle, upper middle and upper quartile pay bands (see regulation 13).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Gender Pay Gap Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 52138,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 10556,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Mean_Bonus_Pay_Equality_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Mean_Gender_Pay_Gap_Bonus_Pay.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Mean_Gender_Pay_Gap_Bonus_Pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8674661,
      "name": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service+Median Gender Pay Gap (Bonus Pay)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Median_Gender_Pay_Gap_Bonus_Pay.json",
      "designer": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service",
      "title": "Median Gender Pay Gap (Bonus Pay)",
      "question": "What is the difference between the median bonus pay for female employees and the median bonus pay for male employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is  based on the UK legislation requiring disclosure of gender pay gaps by companies based in the UK: [[https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2017/9780111152010|The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017]].<br>\n<br>\nData for this metric only comes from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]], and as such it only concerns the performance of UK-based companies. Where this metric is applied to the performance of a multi-national company based outside the UK, the answer relates to the performance of some UK-based subsidiary (see the source for details).",
      "methodology": "The data for this metric is taken from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]].<br>\n<br>\nFrom the legislation:<br>\n<br>\n2.—(1) A relevant employer must publish, for 2017 and each subsequent year, the following information—<br>\n<br>\n(a)the difference between the mean hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 8);<br>\n<br>\n(b)the difference between the median hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 9);<br>\n<br>\n(c)the difference between the mean bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 10);<br>\n<br>\n(d)the difference between the median bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 11);<br>\n<br>\n(e)the proportions of male and female relevant employees who were paid bonus pay (see regulation 12); and<br>\n<br>\n(f)the proportions of male and female full-pay relevant employees in the lower, lower middle, upper middle and upper quartile pay bands (see regulation 13).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Gender Pay Gap Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 52137,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 10556,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Median_Gender_Pay_Gap_Bonus_Pay.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Median_Bonus_Pay_Equality_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Median_Gender_Pay_Gap_Bonus_Pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8674672,
      "name": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service+Percentage Receiving Bonus Pay (Male)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Receiving_Bonus_Pay_Male.json",
      "designer": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service",
      "title": "Percentage Receiving Bonus Pay (Male)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of men receiving bonus pay?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is  based on the UK legislation requiring disclosure of gender pay gaps by companies based in the UK: [[https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2017/9780111152010|The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017]].<br>\n<br>\nData for this metric only comes from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]], and as such it only concerns the performance of UK-based companies. Where this metric is applied to the performance of a multi-national company based outside the UK, the answer relates to the performance of some UK-based subsidiary (see the source for details).",
      "methodology": "The data for this metric is taken from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]].<br>\n<br>\nFrom the legislation:<br>\n<br>\n2.—(1) A relevant employer must publish, for 2017 and each subsequent year, the following information—<br>\n<br>\n(a)the difference between the mean hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 8);<br>\n<br>\n(b)the difference between the median hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 9);<br>\n<br>\n(c)the difference between the mean bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 10);<br>\n<br>\n(d)the difference between the median bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 11);<br>\n<br>\n(e)the proportions of male and female relevant employees who were paid bonus pay (see regulation 12); and<br>\n<br>\n(f)the proportions of male and female full-pay relevant employees in the lower, lower middle, upper middle and upper quartile pay bands (see regulation 13).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Gender Pay Gap Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 63120,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Bonus_Pay_Participation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Receiving_Bonus_Pay_Male+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8674683,
      "name": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service+Percentage Receiving Bonus Pay (Female)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Receiving_Bonus_Pay_Female.json",
      "designer": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service",
      "title": "Percentage Receiving Bonus Pay (Female)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of women receiving bonus pay?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is  based on the UK legislation requiring disclosure of gender pay gaps by companies based in the UK: [[https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2017/9780111152010|The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017]].<br>\n<br>\nData for this metric only comes from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]], and as such it only concerns the performance of UK-based companies. Where this metric is applied to the performance of a multi-national company based outside the UK, the answer relates to the performance of some UK-based subsidiary (see the source for details).",
      "methodology": "The data for this metric is taken from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]].<br>\n<br>\nFrom the legislation:<br>\n<br>\n2.—(1) A relevant employer must publish, for 2017 and each subsequent year, the following information—<br>\n<br>\n(a)the difference between the mean hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 8);<br>\n<br>\n(b)the difference between the median hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 9);<br>\n<br>\n(c)the difference between the mean bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 10);<br>\n<br>\n(d)the difference between the median bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 11);<br>\n<br>\n(e)the proportions of male and female relevant employees who were paid bonus pay (see regulation 12); and<br>\n<br>\n(f)the proportions of male and female full-pay relevant employees in the lower, lower middle, upper middle and upper quartile pay bands (see regulation 13).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Gender Pay Gap Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 63120,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Bonus_Pay_Participation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Receiving_Bonus_Pay_Female+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8674694,
      "name": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service+Percentage Lower Pay Quartile (Male)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Lower_Pay_Quartile_Male.json",
      "designer": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service",
      "title": "Percentage Lower Pay Quartile (Male)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of men in the lower hourly pay quarter?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is  based on the UK legislation requiring disclosure of gender pay gaps by companies based in the UK: [[https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2017/9780111152010|The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017]].<br>\n<br>\nData for this metric only comes from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]], and as such it only concerns the performance of UK-based companies. Where this metric is applied to the performance of a multi-national company based outside the UK, the answer relates to the performance of some UK-based subsidiary (see the source for details).",
      "methodology": "The data for this metric is taken from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]].<br>\n<br>\nFrom the legislation:<br>\n<br>\n2.—(1) A relevant employer must publish, for 2017 and each subsequent year, the following information—<br>\n<br>\n(a)the difference between the mean hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 8);<br>\n<br>\n(b)the difference between the median hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 9);<br>\n<br>\n(c)the difference between the mean bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 10);<br>\n<br>\n(d)the difference between the median bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 11);<br>\n<br>\n(e)the proportions of male and female relevant employees who were paid bonus pay (see regulation 12); and<br>\n<br>\n(f)the proportions of male and female full-pay relevant employees in the lower, lower middle, upper middle and upper quartile pay bands (see regulation 13).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Gender Pay Gap Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 62796,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Lower_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Lower_Pay_Quartile_Male+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8674705,
      "name": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service+Percentage Lower Pay Quartile (Female)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Lower_Pay_Quartile_Female.json",
      "designer": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service",
      "title": "Percentage Lower Pay Quartile (Female)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of women in the lower hourly pay quarter?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is  based on the UK legislation requiring disclosure of gender pay gaps by companies based in the UK: [[https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2017/9780111152010|The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017]].<br>\n<br>\nData for this metric only comes from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]], and as such it only concerns the performance of UK-based companies. Where this metric is applied to the performance of a multi-national company based outside the UK, the answer relates to the performance of some UK-based subsidiary (see the source for details).",
      "methodology": "The data for this metric is taken from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]].<br>\n<br>\nFrom the legislation:<br>\n<br>\n2.—(1) A relevant employer must publish, for 2017 and each subsequent year, the following information—<br>\n<br>\n(a)the difference between the mean hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 8);<br>\n<br>\n(b)the difference between the median hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 9);<br>\n<br>\n(c)the difference between the mean bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 10);<br>\n<br>\n(d)the difference between the median bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 11);<br>\n<br>\n(e)the proportions of male and female relevant employees who were paid bonus pay (see regulation 12); and<br>\n<br>\n(f)the proportions of male and female full-pay relevant employees in the lower, lower middle, upper middle and upper quartile pay bands (see regulation 13).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Gender Pay Gap Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 62796,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Lower_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Lower_Pay_Quartile_Female+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8674716,
      "name": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service+Percentage Lower Middle Pay Quartile (Male)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Lower_Middle_Pay_Quartile_Male.json",
      "designer": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service",
      "title": "Percentage Lower Middle Pay Quartile (Male)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of men in the lower middle hourly pay quarter?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is  based on the UK legislation requiring disclosure of gender pay gaps by companies based in the UK: [[https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2017/9780111152010|The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017]].<br>\n<br>\nData for this metric only comes from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]], and as such it only concerns the performance of UK-based companies. Where this metric is applied to the performance of a multi-national company based outside the UK, the answer relates to the performance of some UK-based subsidiary (see the source for details).",
      "methodology": "The data for this metric is taken from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]].<br>\n<br>\nFrom the legislation:<br>\n<br>\n2.—(1) A relevant employer must publish, for 2017 and each subsequent year, the following information—<br>\n<br>\n(a)the difference between the mean hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 8);<br>\n<br>\n(b)the difference between the median hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 9);<br>\n<br>\n(c)the difference between the mean bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 10);<br>\n<br>\n(d)the difference between the median bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 11);<br>\n<br>\n(e)the proportions of male and female relevant employees who were paid bonus pay (see regulation 12); and<br>\n<br>\n(f)the proportions of male and female full-pay relevant employees in the lower, lower middle, upper middle and upper quartile pay bands (see regulation 13).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Gender Pay Gap Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 62796,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Lower_Middle_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Lower_Middle_Pay_Quartile_Male+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8674727,
      "name": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service+Percentage Lower Middle Pay Quartile (Female)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Lower_Middle_Pay_Quartile_Female.json",
      "designer": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service",
      "title": "Percentage Lower Middle Pay Quartile (Female)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of women in the lower middle hourly pay quarter?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is  based on the UK legislation requiring disclosure of gender pay gaps by companies based in the UK: [[https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2017/9780111152010|The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017]].<br>\n<br>\nData for this metric only comes from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]], and as such it only concerns the performance of UK-based companies. Where this metric is applied to the performance of a multi-national company based outside the UK, the answer relates to the performance of some UK-based subsidiary (see the source for details).",
      "methodology": "The data for this metric is taken from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]].<br>\n<br>\nFrom the legislation:<br>\n<br>\n2.—(1) A relevant employer must publish, for 2017 and each subsequent year, the following information—<br>\n<br>\n(a)the difference between the mean hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 8);<br>\n<br>\n(b)the difference between the median hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 9);<br>\n<br>\n(c)the difference between the mean bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 10);<br>\n<br>\n(d)the difference between the median bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 11);<br>\n<br>\n(e)the proportions of male and female relevant employees who were paid bonus pay (see regulation 12); and<br>\n<br>\n(f)the proportions of male and female full-pay relevant employees in the lower, lower middle, upper middle and upper quartile pay bands (see regulation 13).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Gender Pay Gap Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 62796,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Lower_Middle_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Lower_Middle_Pay_Quartile_Female+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8674742,
      "name": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service+Percentage Upper Middle Pay Quartile (Male)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Upper_Middle_Pay_Quartile_Male.json",
      "designer": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service",
      "title": "Percentage Upper Middle Pay Quartile (Male)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of men in the upper middle hourly pay quarter?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is  based on the UK legislation requiring disclosure of gender pay gaps by companies based in the UK: [[https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2017/9780111152010|The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017]].<br>\n<br>\nData for this metric only comes from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]], and as such it only concerns the performance of UK-based companies. Where this metric is applied to the performance of a multi-national company based outside the UK, the answer relates to the performance of some UK-based subsidiary (see the source for details).",
      "methodology": "The data for this metric is taken from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]].<br>\n<br>\nFrom the legislation:<br>\n<br>\n2.—(1) A relevant employer must publish, for 2017 and each subsequent year, the following information—<br>\n<br>\n(a)the difference between the mean hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 8);<br>\n<br>\n(b)the difference between the median hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 9);<br>\n<br>\n(c)the difference between the mean bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 10);<br>\n<br>\n(d)the difference between the median bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 11);<br>\n<br>\n(e)the proportions of male and female relevant employees who were paid bonus pay (see regulation 12); and<br>\n<br>\n(f)the proportions of male and female full-pay relevant employees in the lower, lower middle, upper middle and upper quartile pay bands (see regulation 13).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Gender Pay Gap Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 62796,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Upper_Middle_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Upper_Middle_Pay_Quartile_Male+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8674753,
      "name": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service+Percentage Upper Middle Pay Quartile (Female)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Upper_Middle_Pay_Quartile_Female.json",
      "designer": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service",
      "title": "Percentage Upper Middle Pay Quartile (Female)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of women in the upper middle hourly pay quarter?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is  based on the UK legislation requiring disclosure of gender pay gaps by companies based in the UK: [[https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2017/9780111152010|The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017]].<br>\n<br>\nData for this metric only comes from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]], and as such it only concerns the performance of UK-based companies. Where this metric is applied to the performance of a multi-national company based outside the UK, the answer relates to the performance of some UK-based subsidiary (see the source for details).",
      "methodology": "The data for this metric is taken from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]].<br>\n<br>\nFrom the legislation:<br>\n<br>\n2.—(1) A relevant employer must publish, for 2017 and each subsequent year, the following information—<br>\n<br>\n(a)the difference between the mean hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 8);<br>\n<br>\n(b)the difference between the median hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 9);<br>\n<br>\n(c)the difference between the mean bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 10);<br>\n<br>\n(d)the difference between the median bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 11);<br>\n<br>\n(e)the proportions of male and female relevant employees who were paid bonus pay (see regulation 12); and<br>\n<br>\n(f)the proportions of male and female full-pay relevant employees in the lower, lower middle, upper middle and upper quartile pay bands (see regulation 13).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Gender Pay Gap Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 62796,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Upper_Middle_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Upper_Middle_Pay_Quartile_Female+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8674764,
      "name": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service+Percentage Top Pay Quartile (Male)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Top_Pay_Quartile_Male.json",
      "designer": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service",
      "title": "Percentage Top Pay Quartile (Male)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of men in the top hourly pay quarter?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is  based on the UK legislation requiring disclosure of gender pay gaps by companies based in the UK: [[https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2017/9780111152010|The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017]].<br>\n<br>\nData for this metric only comes from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]], and as such it only concerns the performance of UK-based companies. Where this metric is applied to the performance of a multi-national company based outside the UK, the answer relates to the performance of some UK-based subsidiary (see the source for details).",
      "methodology": "The data for this metric is taken from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]].<br>\n<br>\nFrom the legislation:<br>\n<br>\n2.—(1) A relevant employer must publish, for 2017 and each subsequent year, the following information—<br>\n<br>\n(a)the difference between the mean hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 8);<br>\n<br>\n(b)the difference between the median hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 9);<br>\n<br>\n(c)the difference between the mean bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 10);<br>\n<br>\n(d)the difference between the median bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 11);<br>\n<br>\n(e)the proportions of male and female relevant employees who were paid bonus pay (see regulation 12); and<br>\n<br>\n(f)the proportions of male and female full-pay relevant employees in the lower, lower middle, upper middle and upper quartile pay bands (see regulation 13).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Gender Pay Gap Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 62795,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Top_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Top_Pay_Quartile_Male+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8674775,
      "name": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service+Percentage Top Pay Quartile (Female)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Top_Pay_Quartile_Female.json",
      "designer": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service",
      "title": "Percentage Top Pay Quartile (Female)",
      "question": "What is the percentage of women in the top hourly pay quarter?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is  based on the UK legislation requiring disclosure of gender pay gaps by companies based in the UK: [[https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2017/9780111152010|The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017]].<br>\n<br>\nData for this metric only comes from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]], and as such it only concerns the performance of UK-based companies. Where this metric is applied to the performance of a multi-national company based outside the UK, the answer relates to the performance of some UK-based subsidiary (see the source for details).",
      "methodology": "The data for this metric is taken from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]].<br>\n<br>\nFrom the legislation:<br>\n<br>\n2.—(1) A relevant employer must publish, for 2017 and each subsequent year, the following information—<br>\n<br>\n(a)the difference between the mean hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 8);<br>\n<br>\n(b)the difference between the median hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 9);<br>\n<br>\n(c)the difference between the mean bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 10);<br>\n<br>\n(d)the difference between the median bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 11);<br>\n<br>\n(e)the proportions of male and female relevant employees who were paid bonus pay (see regulation 12); and<br>\n<br>\n(f)the proportions of male and female full-pay relevant employees in the lower, lower middle, upper middle and upper quartile pay bands (see regulation 13).",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Gender Pay Gap Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 62796,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Top_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Percentage_Top_Pay_Quartile_Female+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8674786,
      "name": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service+Employer Size",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Employer_Size.json",
      "designer": "GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service",
      "title": "Employer Size",
      "question": "How many people does this entity employ?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is  based on the UK legislation requiring disclosure of gender pay gaps by companies based in the UK: [[https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2017/9780111152010|The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017]].<br>\n<br>\nData for this metric only comes from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]], and as such it only concerns the performance of UK-based companies. Where this metric is applied to the performance of a multi-national company based outside the UK, the answer relates to the performance of some UK-based subsidiary (see the source for details).",
      "methodology": "The data for this metric is taken from the [[https://gender-pay-gap.service.gov.uk/Viewing/search-results|GOV.UK Gender Pay Gap Service]].<br>\n<br>\nFrom the legislation:<br>\n<br>\n2.—(1) A relevant employer must publish, for 2017 and each subsequent year, the following information—<br>\n<br>\n(a)the difference between the mean hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 8);<br>\n<br>\n(b)the difference between the median hourly rate of pay of male full-pay relevant employees and that of female full-pay relevant employees (see regulation 9);<br>\n<br>\n(c)the difference between the mean bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 10);<br>\n<br>\n(d)the difference between the median bonus pay paid to male relevant employees and that paid to female relevant employees (see regulation 11);<br>\n<br>\n(e)the proportions of male and female relevant employees who were paid bonus pay (see regulation 12); and<br>\n<br>\n(f)the proportions of male and female full-pay relevant employees in the lower, lower middle, upper middle and upper quartile pay bands (see regulation 13).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Less than 250",
        "250 to 499",
        "500 to 999",
        "1000 to 4999",
        "5000 to 19,999",
        "20,000 or more",
        "Not Provided"
      ],
      "report_type": "Gender Pay Gap Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 63120,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Employee.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Number_of_employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GOV_UK_Gender_Pay_Gap_Service+Employer_Size+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8687905,
      "name": "Better Cotton Initiative (BCI)+Supplier Type",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Better_Cotton_Initiative_BCI+Supplier_Type.json",
      "designer": "Better Cotton Initiative (BCI)",
      "title": "Supplier Type",
      "question": "What type of supplier is the entity listed as in the Better Cotton Platform (BCP)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "End Product Manufacturer",
        "Fabric Maker",
        "Integrated Spinner",
        "Non-Lint Trader",
        "Sourcing Agent",
        "Spinner",
        "Trader",
        "Vertically Integrated Mill"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 115,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 115,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Better_Cotton_Initiative_BCI+Supplier_Type+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8687983,
      "name": "Better Cotton Initiative (BCI)+Better Cotton Supplier",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Better_Cotton_Initiative_BCI+Better_Cotton_Supplier.json",
      "designer": "Better Cotton Initiative (BCI)",
      "title": "Better Cotton Supplier",
      "question": "Is the entity a Better Cotton Initiative listed supplier? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Better_Cotton_Initiative_BCI+Better_Cotton_Supplier+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 8772491,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Consultation Process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Consultation_Process.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Consultation Process",
      "question": "Does the statement describe consulting with any entities that it owns or controls?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Australian Modern Slavery Act 2018 requires companies to describe how it consulted on its statement with any entities it owns or controls. If it is a “Joint Statement”, the company will need to describe how it consulted with each reporting entity described as part of the group statement.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>There is no specific criteria for what 'consultation' means, but it must be clear that this consultation has occurred and is sufficient to ensure that the modern slavery risks relating to other entities have been appropriately identified, assessed and addressed and that other entity is aware of what actions they need to take. Companies that do not own or control any other entities do not need to respond to this criterion. Likewise, larger companies that may own or control other entities that do not have actual physical operations or assets (ie a company that may perform a group-wide treasury function) does also not have to describe detailed consultation.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>See [[https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/criminal-justice/files/modern-slavery-reporting-entities.pdf|Australian Guidance for Reporting Entities]], p. 57 for more details.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"color: #404040; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;\">This metric is asking whether the <strong>company has consulted with any owned or controlled entities to produce its Modern Slavery Act statement.</strong> </span></p>\r\n<p>This consultation could include descriptions of: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>regular meetings between each entity's sustainability or procurement or other relevant teams to discuss the statement</li>\r\n<li>review of the statement by other entities</li>\r\n<li>opportunity for other entities to input into the statement</li>\r\n<li>briefings for the boards of the other entities on the statement</li>\r\n<li>the reporting entity’s senior management being aware of the content and development of the statement</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Such a statement would often be found at either the beginning or the end of the statement. In the case of Joint Statements, this would more likely be found at the end of the statement in the context of the approval of the statement.</p>\r\n<p>If a company <strong>clearly describes consultation</strong> with its owned or controlled entities to prepare the statement, please select the <strong>\"Yes\"</strong> value. </p>\r\n<p>Note that approval from owned or controlled entities is not sufficient for a \"Yes\" value as this approval is measured by another metric. </p>\r\n<p>If a company has <strong>previously mentioned in its statement that it owns or controls any entities but does not disclose having consulted with them</strong>, please select the<strong> “No”</strong> value.</p>\r\n<p>However, if a company <strong>does not disclose owning or controlling other entities</strong>, please select the <strong>\"Not Applicable\"</strong> value. </p>\r\n<p>Similarly, if a company <strong>discloses that it owns or control entities but these do not have any physical operations or assets</strong> (this could be a holding company), please select <strong>“Not Applicable”</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>While this forms part of mandatory criteria for the Australian Modern Slavery Act 2018, it would also be considered good practice for the UK Modern Slavery Act. </p>\r\n<p>{{Example where consultation occured|closed_bar}}</p>\r\n<p>{{Example where consultation did not occur|closed_bar}}</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1196,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 30,
      "companies": 714,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Consultation_Process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 9031518,
      "name": "Green Peace+Elimination of PFCs (open)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Green_Peace+Elimination_of_PFCs_open.json",
      "designer": "Green Peace",
      "title": "Elimination of PFCs (open)",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy to elimate PFCs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<div>\r\n<p>PFCs are a group of chemicals that are known for their water and oil repellent properties and have been identified as persistent, bio-accumulative and toxic.  The process of eliminating PFCs involves the identification of suitable substitutes for some or all of the functions and attributes of PFC.</p>\r\n<div>\r\n<p>A credible programme of elimination needs to include the whole group of PFCs as well as the entire product range of the company concerned, leading to the elimination of this group of chemicals. Unfortunately, the Greenwashers Nike and Li-Ning do not commit to the elimination of all PFCs with a clear deadline, in all their products and allow the substitution of PFCs that are now subject to regulations, with other PFCs that are not yet regulated, but may be equally hazardous.</p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": "<div>\r\n<p>Responsible Detox brands have committed to phase out (and some have already eliminated from their global supply-chains) any use and discharge of the hazardous chemical group perfluorinated chemicals (PFCs).</p>\r\n<p>PFCs are a group of chemicals that are known for their water and oil repellent properties and have been identified as persistent, bio-accumulative and toxic. The process of eliminating PFCs involves the identification of suitable substitutes for some or all of the functions and attributes of PFCs. Some Detox Leaders have already eliminated the use of PFCs in their products through an elimination programme that includes progressively substituting them with safer alternatives.</p>\r\n<p>A credible programme of elimination needs to include the whole group of PFCs as well as the entire product range of the company concerned, leading to the elimination of this group of chemicals. Unfortunately, the Detox Greenwashers do not commit to the elimination of all PFCs with a clear deadline, in all their products and allow the substitution of PFCs that are now subject to regulations, with other PFCs that are not yet regulated, but may be equally hazardous.</p>\r\n</div>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Green_Peace+Elimination_of_PFCs_open+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12072864,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+Ownership Share of Tea Supplier",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Ownership_Share_of_Tea_Supplier.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "Ownership Share of Tea Supplier",
      "question": "Does this company have an ownership share in its disclosed supplier? ",
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre's Tea Transparency Tracker project. </p>\r\n<p>Without supply chain transparency, workers don’t know where the tea they pick goes and remediation for abuses from forced labour to gender-based violence stop at the estate instead of going up the chain to where most of the value lies.  </p>\r\n<p>The Business &amp; Human Rights Resource Centre addressed this gap by approaching 65 companies with a request for them to disclose the estates and bought-leaf factories that they source their tea from, to be held centrally in the first Tea Transparency Tracker - hosted by Wikirate. We now have 3100+ estates and factories linked to 20 companies on the Tracker. </p>\r\n<p>A map of the tea supply chain and further information about the project can be found <a href=\"https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/from-us/tea-transparency-tracker/\">on the BHRRC's website.</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This data was collected through a survey of tea companies and a request for supply chain disclosure. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Ownership_Share_of_Tea_Supplier+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12072875,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+Ownership Share by Tea Company",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Ownership_Share_by_Tea_Company.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "Ownership Share by Tea Company",
      "question": "Does the company which buys tea from this supplier have an ownership share in the supplier? ",
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 53,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 53,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+Ownership_Share_by_Tea_Company+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12137098,
      "name": "Aileen Rob+Number of Workers (Yearly Change)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+Number_of_Workers_Yearly_Change.json",
      "designer": "Aileen Rob",
      "title": "Number of Workers (Yearly Change)",
      "question": "What is the yearly change in the number of workers at this facility?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  (m1 - m2) / m2 * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "name": "m1",
          "metric": "~4780588"
        },
        {
          "name": "m2",
          "metric": "~4780588",
          "year": "-1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 13368,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8546,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+Number_of_Workers_Yearly_Change+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12137272,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Actions to Regulate Foreign Migrant Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Actions_to_Regulate_Foreign_Migrant_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Actions to Regulate Foreign Migrant Workers",
      "question": "Does the company publish actions related to the regularisation of foreign migrant workers in its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "A major cause of forced labour in today’s global supply chains is the charging of recruitment fees to migrant workers. Such payments can create situations of debt bondage and leave low-wage workers vulnerable to human trafficking and further exploitation.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes its actions related to the regularisation of foreign migrant workers in its supply chain.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Recruitment Agency<br>\n- Modern Slavery<br>\n- Forced Labour<br>\n- Bonded Labour<br>\n- Migrant workers<br>\n- Recruitment Fees<br>\n- Debt bondage<br>\n<br>\nThings to keep in mind:<br>\n- A good place to look for information on modern slavery might be a company's Modern Slavery Statement or a California Transparency in Supply Chains Act statement.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Actions to Regulate Foreign Migrant Workers+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Actions_to_Regulate_Foreign_Migrant_Workers+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Actions_to_Regulate_Foreign_Migrant_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12137283,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Reduced Salaries (COVID-19 Response)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Reduced_Salaries_COVID_19_Response.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Reduced Salaries (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the percentage or number of employees who have had reduced salaries as a result of COVID-19?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "As an outcome of the pandemic, many workers have had their salaries reduced. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workers across global supply chains.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the percentage or number of employees who have had reduced salaries as a result of COVID-19.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Reduced salary<br>\n- Wage reduction<br>\n- Pay cut",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Termination & Dismissal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Reduced Salaries (COVID-19 Response)+Aileen Rob"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Reduced_Salaries_COVID_19_Response+Aileen_Rob.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Reduced_Salaries_COVID_19_Response+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12137294,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Protective Measures (COVID-19 Response)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Protective_Measures_COVID_19_Response.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Protective Measures (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose which protective measures have been implemented in the workplace due to COVID-19?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Work locations such as factory floors and textile production facilities are risk environments for COVID-19 transmission. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workers across global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nExamples of protective measures would be periodic cleaning of workstations, requirement to wear a mask, availability of alcohol for hand hygiene, employee rotation and/or establishment of shifts between different teams, etc.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the protective measures implemented in the workplace due to COVID-19.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- COVID-19<br>\n- Mask<br>\n- Hygiene<br>\n- Protection",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Emergency Preparedness",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mental Health Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Protective Measures (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 73,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 73,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Protective_Measures_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Protective_Measures_COVID_19_Response+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12137305,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Use of Emergency Aid (COVID-19 Response)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Use_of_Emergency_Aid_COVID_19_Response.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Use of Emergency Aid (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose whether it used, and in which way, the emergency aid provided by the government to companies to tackle the COVID-19 crisis?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Apparel companies may have received emergency economic aid from the government as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. It is important brands are disclosing how this aid was used as it helps inform understanding of where the impact was highest. <br>\n<br>\nExamples of aid available to companies would be lines of credit, loans to pay off payrolls, use of MP 936/20, which allowed the reduction of working hours and the temporary suspension of contracts due to the pandemic.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company used, and in which way, the emergency aid provided by the government to companies to tackle the COVID-19 crisis.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- COVID-19<br>\n- Aid<br>\n- MP 935/20<br>\n- Loan",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Use of Emergency Aid (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Use_of_Emergency_Aid_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Use_of_Emergency_Aid_COVID_19_Response+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12137316,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Home Office Regime Implementation (COVID-19 Response)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Home_Office_Regime_Implementation_COVID_19_Response.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Home Office Regime Implementation (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how it implemented the home office regime for employees as a strategy to reduce the chances of contagion by COVID-19?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "As an outcome of the pandemic, some companies implemented work-from-home policies for sections of their workforce. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workers around the world.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company used, and in which way, the emergency aid provided by the government to companies to tackle the COVID-19 crisis.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- COVID-19<br>\n- Homeworking<br>\n- Work from home",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Emergency Preparedness",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Home Office Regime Implementation (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Home_Office_Regime_Implementation_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Home_Office_Regime_Implementation_COVID_19_Response+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12137327,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Career Development Mechanisms to Address Gender Inequality",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Career_Development_Mechanisms_to_Address_Gender_Inequality.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Career Development Mechanisms to Address Gender Inequality",
      "question": "Does the company disclose information on mechanisms or programmes for career development aiming at reducing gender inequality and promoting opportunities for growth and career evolution for women?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Some companies have implemented mechanisms and programmes for career development aimed at reducing gender inequalities within their workforce.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses  information on mechanisms or programmes for career development aimed at reducing gender inequality and promoting opportunities for growth and career evolution for women.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Gender equality<br>\n- Career development<br>\n- Women",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production"
      ],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Career Development Mechanisms to Address Gender Inequality+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Career_Development_Mechanisms_to_Address_Gender_Inequality+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Career_Development_Mechanisms_to_Address_Gender_Inequality+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12137338,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Career Development Mechanisms to Address Racial Inequality",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Career_Development_Mechanisms_to_Address_Racial_Inequality.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Career Development Mechanisms to Address Racial Inequality",
      "question": "Does the company disclose information on mechanisms or programmes for career development aiming at reducing inequality between races and promoting growth and evolution opportunities for black employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Some companies have implemented mechanisms and programmes for career development aimed at reducing racial inequalities within their workforce.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses  information on mechanisms or programmes for career development aimed at reducing inequality between races and promoting growth and evolution opportunities for black employees.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Gender equality<br>\n- Career development<br>\n- Race<br>\n- Racial<br>\n- Racism<br>\n- Ethnic<br>\n- Ethnicity<br>\n- Equality<br>\n- Empowerment<br>\n- Equal Opportunity",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion Policies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Career Development Mechanisms to Address Racial Inequality+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Career_Development_Mechanisms_to_Address_Racial_Inequality+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Career_Development_Mechanisms_to_Address_Racial_Inequality+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12137349,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Ethnicity Pay Gap (Supply Chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Ethnicity_Pay_Gap_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Ethnicity Pay Gap (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "Does the company publish annual ethnicity pay gap, including by distribution of job roles (e.g. employees such as helpers, machinists verses supervisors/managers) in supplier facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Publishing annual ethnicity pay gap data including by distribution of job roles in supply chains is important because it is a tangible output that holds brands accountable to their commitment on racial equality.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses ethnicity pay gap data, including by distribution of job roles in supplier facilities. For example, employees such as helpers, machinists verses supervisors/managers<br><br>Where to look for this information:<br>- Gender Pay Gap Report<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>Good keywords for your searches include:<br>- Race<br>- Racial<br>- Racism<br>- Ethnic<br>- Ethnicity<br>- Equality<br>- Empowerment<br>- Equal Opportunity</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Ethnicity Pay Gap (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Ethnicity_Pay_Gap_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Ethnicity_Pay_Gap_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12137360,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Products Produced in Brazil",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Products_Produced_in_Brazil.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Quantity of Products Produced in Brazil",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the quantity of its products that are produced in Brazil?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Knowing the quantity of products produced in a country helps us to understand the social, environmental and economic impact that company has on the region.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the quantity of its products that are produced in Brazil<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Brazil<br>\n- Brasil<br>\n- Annual production<br>\n- Product",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Products Produced in Brazil+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Products_Produced_in_Brazil+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Products_Produced_in_Brazil+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12152903,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Actions to Regulate Foreign Migrant Workers+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Actions_to_Regulate_Foreign_Migrant_Workers+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Actions to Regulate Foreign Migrant Workers",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">A major cause of forced labour in today’s global supply chains is the charging of recruitment fees to migrant workers. Such payments can create situations of debt bondage and leave low-wage workers vulnerable to human trafficking and further exploitation.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Tackling_Modern_Slavery_Score_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Actions_to_Regulate_Foreign_Migrant_Workers+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12153094,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Reduced Salaries (COVID-19 Response)+Aileen Rob",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Reduced_Salaries_COVID_19_Response+Aileen_Rob.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Reduced Salaries (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">As an outcome of the pandemic, many workers have had their salaries reduced. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workers across global supply chains.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Termination & Dismissal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Reduced_Salaries_COVID_19_Response+Aileen_Rob+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12153225,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Protective Measures (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Protective_Measures_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Protective Measures (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Work locations such as factory floors and textile production facilities are risk environments for COVID-19 transmission. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workers across global supply chains.</span><br style=\"font-size: 16px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 16px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Examples of protective measures would be periodic cleaning of workstations, requirement to wear a mask, availability of alcohol for hand hygiene, employee rotation and/or establishment of shifts between different teams, etc.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Emergency Preparedness",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mental Health Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 73,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 73,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response_Brazil_2021.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response_Mexico_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Protective_Measures_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12153314,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Use of Emergency Aid (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Use_of_Emergency_Aid_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Use of Emergency Aid (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Apparel companies may have received emergency economic aid from the government as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. It is important brands are disclosing how this aid was used as it helps inform understanding of where the impact was highest.</span><br style=\"font-size: 16px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 16px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Examples of aid available to companies would be lines of credit, loans to pay off payrolls, use of MP 936/20, which allowed the reduction of working hours and the temporary suspension of contracts due to the pandemic.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Use_of_Emergency_Aid_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12153437,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Home Office Regime Implementation (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Home_Office_Regime_Implementation_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Home Office Regime Implementation (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">As an outcome of the pandemic, some companies implemented work-from-home policies for sections of their workforce. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workers around the world.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Emergency Preparedness",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Home_Office_Regime_Implementation_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12153536,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Career Development Mechanisms to Address Gender Inequality+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Career_Development_Mechanisms_to_Address_Gender_Inequality+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Career Development Mechanisms to Address Gender Inequality",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Some companies have implemented mechanisms and programmes for career development aimed at reducing gender inequalities within their workforce.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Career_Development_Mechanisms_to_Address_Gender_Inequality+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12153633,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Career Development Mechanisms to Address Racial Inequality+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Career_Development_Mechanisms_to_Address_Racial_Inequality+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Career Development Mechanisms to Address Racial Inequality",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Some companies have implemented mechanisms and programmes for career development aimed at reducing racial inequalities within their workforce.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion Policies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Racial_Equality_Score_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Career_Development_Mechanisms_to_Address_Racial_Inequality+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12153717,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Ethnicity Pay Gap (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Ethnicity_Pay_Gap_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Ethnicity Pay Gap (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Publishing annual ethnicity pay gap data is important because it is a tangible output that holds brands accountable to their commitment on racial equality.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Racial_Equality_Score_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Ethnicity_Pay_Gap_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12154160,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Quantity of Products Produced in Brazil+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Products_Produced_in_Brazil+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Quantity of Products Produced in Brazil",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Knowing the quantity of products produced in a country helps us to understand the social, environmental and economic impact that company has on the region.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Quantity_of_Products_Produced_in_Brazil+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12171084,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3.1 Tier One Factory Disclosure+Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_1_Tier_One_Factory_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3.1 Tier One Factory Disclosure",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Name of Facility\":\"1.153846154\",\"Address\":\"1.153846154\",\"Type of products or services\":\"0.7692307692\",\"Approximate number of workers at each site\":\"0.7692307692\",\"Sex-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site\":\"0.3846153846\",\"If facility has trade union\":\"0.3846153846\",\"If the facility has an independent worker committee\":\"0.3846153846\",\"% or number of migrant or contract workers\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Certifications the facility has (if any) (2021 only)\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Name of Parent Company (for each facility if applicable)\":\"1.153846154\",\"List is publicly available as a csv or Excel spreadsheet\":\"1.153846154\",\"Discloses what percentage of its tier one factories is published\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Discloses 95% or higher of tier one factories are included in the list/map\":\"0.7692307692\",\"Publishes that this list or map of tier one factories has been updated within the past 6 months\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Race-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site (FTI Brazil only)\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Nothing\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_1_Tier_One_Factory_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12171279,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3.2 Processing Facilities Disclosure+Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_2_Processing_Facilities_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3.2 Processing Facilities Disclosure",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Name of Facility\":\"1.153846154\",\"Address\":\"1.153846154\",\"Type of products or services\":\"0.7692307692\",\"Approximate number of workers at each site\":\"0.7692307692\",\"Sex-disaggregated breakdown of workers\":\"0.3846153846\",\"If facility has trade union\":\"0.3846153846\",\"If the facility has an independent worker committee\":\"0.3846153846\",\"% or number of migrant or contract workers\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Certifications the facility has (if any) (2021 only)\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Name of Parent Company (for each facility if applicable)\":\"1.153846154\",\"Discloses which tier one facility (or facilities) this processing facility works with\":\"\",\"List is publicly available as a csv or Excel spreadsheet\":\"1.153846154\",\"Discloses what percentage of processing facilities is published\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Discloses 95% or higher of processing facilities are included in the list/map\":\"0.7692307692\",\"Publishes that this list or map of processing facilities has been updated within the past 6 months\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Race-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site (FTI Brazil only)\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Nothing\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_2_Processing_Facilities_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12171331,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3.3 Raw Materials Suppliers Disclosure+Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_3_Raw_Materials_Suppliers_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3.3 Raw Materials Suppliers Disclosure",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Name of supplier (e.g. parent company) (2021 only)\":\"1.304347826\",\"Name of Supplier (e.g. facility or farm)\":\"1.304347826\",\"Address\":\"1.304347826\",\"Type of raw material products or services\":\"0.8695652174\",\"Approximate number of workers\":\"0.8695652174\",\"Sex-disaggregated breakdown of workers\":\"0.4347826087\",\"% or number of migrant or contract workers\":\"0.4347826087\",\"List is publicly available as a csv or Excel spreadsheet\":\"1.304347826\",\"Discloses what percentage of raw materials suppliers is published\":\"0.4347826087\",\"Discloses supplier list that covers more than one raw material type (2021 only)\":\"0.4347826087\",\"Discloses 95% or higher of raw materials suppliers are included in the list/map\":\"\",\"Publishes that this list or map of raw materials suppliers has been updated within the past 12 months\":\"0.4347826087\",\"Discloses whether the company is tracing the source/supplier of one or more specific raw materials\":\"0.4347826087\",\"Race-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site (FTI Brazil only)\":\"0.4347826087\",\"Nothing\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_3_Raw_Materials_Suppliers_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12171510,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3. Traceability Score (Brazil 2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3. Traceability Score (Brazil 2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 3. Traceability in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">The Fashion Transparency Index Brazil is an annual review of the largest Brazilian fashion brands and retailers ranked according to their level of public disclosure on human rights and environmental policies, practices and impacts in their own operations and in their supply chains. Read the full Index for 2021 <a href=\"https://issuu.com/fashionrevolution/docs/fashiontransparencyindexbrazil_2021\">here</a>. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">O Índice de Transparência da Moda Brasil é uma análise anual de grandes marcas e varejistas de moda que operam no país, classificadas de acordo com o nível de informações que divulgam publicamente sobre suas políticas, práticas e impactos nos direitos humanos e meio ambiente, em suas operações próprias e em suas cadeias de fornecimento. Leia o Índice completo para 2021 <a href=\"https://issuu.com/fashionrevolution/docs/indicedetranparenciadamodabrasil_2021\">aqui.</a></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~12171084",
          "weight": "34.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12171279",
          "weight": "34.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12171331",
          "weight": "30.67"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_Brazil_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12171580,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+COVID-19 Response (Brazil 2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response_Brazil_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "COVID-19 Response (Brazil 2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for their COVID-19 Response in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Termination & Dismissal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Emergency Preparedness",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mental Health Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~12153094",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12153225",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12153314",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606743",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606117",
          "weight": "16.67"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12153437",
          "weight": "16.67"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response_Brazil_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12171656,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Towards Paying Living Wages Score (Brazil 2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Towards Paying Living Wages Score (Brazil 2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for Towards Paying a Living Wage in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The majority of garment workers around the world are paid below a living wage rate. A wage increase is an urgent matter for supply chain workers enabling them to support themselves and their families. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5952070",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5951816",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5951561",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5951055",
          "weight": "28.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5950801",
          "weight": "28.57"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_Brazil_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12171726,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Purchasing Practices Score (Brazil 2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Purchasing Practices Score (Brazil 2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5950548",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5950295",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606225",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606234",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5950042",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5949285",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606243",
          "weight": "14.29"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score_Brazil_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12171790,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.1 Decent Work & Purchasing Practices (Brazil 2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_Brazil_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.1 Decent Work & Purchasing Practices (Brazil 2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5.1 Decent Work & Purchasing Practices in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>According to the ILO, working conditions are at the core of decent and dignified work. Generally speaking, working conditions cover a broad range of topics and issues, from working time (hours of work, rest periods, and work schedules) to remuneration, as well as the physical conditions and mental demands that exist in the workplaces. Here, we put the spotlight on some of the more egregious, thorny, endemic or hidden working conditions issues.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Termination & Dismissal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Emergency Preparedness",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mental Health Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~12171580",
          "weight": "21.43"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12171656",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12171726",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606847",
          "weight": "14.29"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12173743",
          "weight": "14.29"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_Brazil_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12172060,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Gender Equality Score (Brazil 2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Gender Equality Score (Brazil 2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~12153536",
          "weight": "20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5948012",
          "weight": "20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5948273",
          "weight": "40"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5948020",
          "weight": "20"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Gender_Racial_Equality_Score_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score_Brazil_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12172154,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Racial Equality Score (Brazil 2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Racial_Equality_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Racial Equality Score (Brazil 2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for racial equality in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~12153633",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606333",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12153717",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606342",
          "weight": "20.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606351",
          "weight": "20.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Gender_Racial_Equality_Score_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Racial_Equality_Score_Brazil_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12172207,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.2 Gender & Racial Equality Score (Brazil 2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Gender_Racial_Equality_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.2 Gender & Racial Equality Score (Brazil 2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for Gender & Racial Equality in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~12172060",
          "weight": "50.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12172154",
          "weight": "50.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Gender_Racial_Equality_Score_Brazil_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12172281,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.4 Overconsumption, Waste & Circularity (Brazil 2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_Brazil_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.4 Overconsumption, Waste & Circularity (Brazil 2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5.4 Overconsumption, Waste & Circularity in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<div>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Ensuring sustainable production and consumption patterns, minimising excess, tackling textile waste and moving towards circularity.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~12154160",
          "weight": "8.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5954852",
          "weight": "8.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606432",
          "weight": "8.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606441",
          "weight": "8.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606450",
          "weight": "8.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5954346",
          "weight": "8.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5953588",
          "weight": "8.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606477",
          "weight": "8.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606486",
          "weight": "8.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5953337",
          "weight": "8.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5955864",
          "weight": "8.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5955611",
          "weight": "8.33"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_Brazil_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12172346,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Carbon Emissions+Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Emissions+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Carbon Emissions",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Measuring and publishing carbon emissions data shows that a company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Owned and operated facilities\":\"2.5\",\"Supply chain\":\"2.5\",\"Raw material level (2021 only)\":\"5\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Emissions+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12172404,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Energy Use Score (Brazil 2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Use_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Energy Use Score (Brazil 2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for Energy Use in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606639",
          "weight": "33.33"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12172434",
          "weight": "66.66"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Use_Score_Brazil_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12172434,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Renewable Energy Use+Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Renewable_Energy_Use+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Renewable Energy Use",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Owned and operated facilities\":\"5\",\"Supply chain\":\"5\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Use_Score_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Renewable_Energy_Use+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12172498,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.6 Climate Change & Biodiversity (Brazil 2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity_Brazil_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.6 Climate Change & Biodiversity (Brazil 2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5.6 Climate Change & Biodiversity in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606941",
          "weight": "50"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12172346",
          "weight": "28.57"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12172404",
          "weight": "21.43"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity_Brazil_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12173501,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5. Spotlight Issues Score (Brazil 2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5. Spotlight Issues Score (Brazil 2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5. Spotlight Issues in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">The Fashion Transparency Index Brazil is an annual review of the largest Brazilian fashion brands and retailers ranked according to their level of public disclosure on human rights and environmental policies, practices and impacts in their own operations and in their supply chains. Read the full Index for 2021 <a href=\"https://issuu.com/fashionrevolution/docs/fashiontransparencyindexbrazil_2021\">here</a>. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">O Índice de Transparência da Moda Brasil é uma análise anual de grandes marcas e varejistas de moda que operam no país, classificadas de acordo com o nível de informações que divulgam publicamente sobre suas políticas, práticas e impactos nos direitos humanos e meio ambiente, em suas operações próprias e em suas cadeias de fornecimento. Leia o Índice completo para 2021 <a href=\"https://issuu.com/fashionrevolution/docs/indicedetranparenciadamodabrasil_2021\">aqui.</a></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Termination & Dismissal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Emergency Preparedness",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mental Health Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~12171790",
          "weight": "34.15"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12172207",
          "weight": "12.20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606910",
          "weight": "10.98"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12172281",
          "weight": "14.63"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606925",
          "weight": "10.98"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12172498",
          "weight": "17.07"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_Brazil_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12173743,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Tackling Modern Slavery Score (Brazil 2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Tackling_Modern_Slavery_Score_Brazil_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Tackling Modern Slavery Score (Brazil 2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5953084",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5952578",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5952325",
          "weight": "25.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12152903",
          "weight": "25.00"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_Brazil_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Tackling_Modern_Slavery_Score_Brazil_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12174207,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index Brazil 2021? ",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>The Fashion Transparency Index Brazil is an annual review of the largest Brazilian fashion brands and retailers ranked according to their level of public disclosure on human rights and environmental policies, practices and impacts in their own operations and in their supply chains. Read the full Index for 2021 <a href=\"https://issuu.com/fashionrevolution/docs/fashiontransparencyindexbrazil_2021\">here</a>. </p>\r\n<p>O Índice de Transparência da Moda Brasil é uma análise anual de grandes marcas e varejistas de moda que operam no país, classificadas de acordo com o nível de informações que divulgam publicamente sobre suas políticas, práticas e impactos nos direitos humanos e meio ambiente, em suas operações próprias e em suas cadeias de fornecimento. Leia o Índice completo para 2021 <a href=\"https://issuu.com/fashionrevolution/docs/indicedetranparenciadamodabrasil_2021\">aqui.</a></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Termination & Dismissal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Emergency Preparedness",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mental Health Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606840",
          "weight": "13.20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606779",
          "weight": "5.20"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12171510",
          "weight": "30.00"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606948",
          "weight": "18.80"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12173501",
          "weight": "32.80"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Brazil_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12280187,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Number of Female Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Number_of_Female_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Number of Female Workers",
      "question": "How many female workers does this company have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The number of female workers, especially for production and manufacturing facilities, is a good indication for the capacity the company has.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Workers",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12301,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 9485,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Number_of_Female_Employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Number_of_Female_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12280848,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Number of Male Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Number_of_Male_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Number of Male Workers",
      "question": "How many male workers does this company have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The number of male workers, especially for production and manufacturing facilities, is a good indication for the capacity the company has.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Workers",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 11647,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 8999,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Number_of_Male_Employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Number_of_Male_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12322145,
      "name": "As You Sow+Corporate Plastic Pollution Scorecard",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Corporate_Plastic_Pollution_Scorecard.json",
      "designer": "As You Sow",
      "title": "Corporate Plastic Pollution Scorecard",
      "question": "How much plastic pollution do companies make",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Ranks companies positively for the presence of goals; it is up to investors, policy makers, and the public to hold Coca-Cola and other companies in this report accountable for actually meeting their targets and taking tangible action to reduce the enormous plastic mess already in our oceans and avert the chilling predictions of massive future pollution.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/As_You_Sow+Corporate_Plastic_Pollution_Scorecard+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12322163,
      "name": "Jonah Docter-Loeb+Forest 500 Total Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jonah_Docter_Loeb+Forest_500_Total_Score.json",
      "designer": "Jonah Docter-Loeb",
      "title": "Forest 500 Total Score",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Accountability Index",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-1",
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Jonah Docter-Loeb+Forest 500 Total Score+Jonah Docter-Loeb"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Jonah_Docter_Loeb+Forest_500_Total_Score+Jonah_Docter_Loeb.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jonah_Docter_Loeb+Forest_500_Total_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12322665,
      "name": "Jonah Docter-Loeb+Forest 500 Total Score+Jonah Docter-Loeb",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jonah_Docter_Loeb+Forest_500_Total_Score+Jonah_Docter_Loeb.json",
      "designer": "Jonah Docter-Loeb",
      "title": "Forest 500 Total Score",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jonah_Docter_Loeb+Forest_500_Total_Score+Jonah_Docter_Loeb+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12450421,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Number of Migrant Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Number_of_Migrant_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Number of Migrant Workers",
      "question": "How many migrant workers does this company have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Migrant workers are a particularly vulnerable group of workers as they are often dealing with language barriers and might not have the legal documentation that could get them access to local institutions and authorities in case their rights are violated. Extra due diligence to ensure this workforce is not exploited is therefore needed.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Workers",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4578,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 4122,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Migrant_Workers_Disclosed.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Number_of_Migrant_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12536905,
      "name": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre+MSA homepage link (archived)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+MSA_homepage_link_archived.json",
      "designer": "Business & Human Rights Resource Centre",
      "title": "MSA homepage link (archived)",
      "question": "Does the company publish a link to their modern slavery statement on their homepage?\r\n*Note: When researching this metric the \"Year\" field should be set to the current year.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">MSA requires that the statements are visible and easily accessible to the public. This means that the statement should be available on the website of a particular company, and ideally that there must be a prominent link to this statement on the homepage or landing page of the company’s website.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">By having the statement in a prominent place on the homepage of the website, it is available to anyone who wishes to read it. Many of the statements that have been collected on the <a href=\"https://business-humanrights.org/en/uk-modern-slavery-act-registry\" target=\"_blank\">Business &amp; Human Rights Resource Centre Modern Slavery Act Registry</a> were buried in the companies’ websites.<br><br>For further information on publishing the statement please refer to the <a href=\"https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf\">Home Office Guidance, page 15</a>.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">This metric is about finding out whether the company complied with the requirement (of the UK Modern Slavery Act) to link to their statement from the homepage of their website. To research this metric first navigate to the company's home page. You will probably have to add a new source representing the homepage, so click the \"Add a new source\" button and enter the company's homepage URL as the new source.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">If a link to the company's Modern Slavery Act statement appears on the homepage of their website, a value of \"<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes</span>\" should be added, and it should cite the homepage URL as the source. If no mention of the Modern Slavery Act statement can be found on the company's homepage, a \"<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">No</span>\" value should be added, and it should cite the URL of the homepage where you looked for the statement as it's source.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">A good starting point to researching this metric is to use a search engine to search for the <em>company name</em>, click through to company's website, and perform a search on this page (ctrl+f) for terms like \"slavery\" or \"trafficking\".</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">If a link to the company's Modern Slavery Act statement can be found within an appropriately titled drop-down menu on the homepage, this is also sufficient for giving the company a \"<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes</span>\" value. So, before entering a \"<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">No</span>\" value please take a quick look in any drop-down menus that might contain a link to the statement.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Some companies have a separate \"corporate\" website (e.g. <a href=\"http://btplc.com/\" target=\"_blank\">btplc.com</a> is the corporate site of BT Group), if this is the case then placement on the homepage of this site counts for a \"<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes</span>\" value.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">When adding a \"<span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Yes</span>\" value, please include a short comment explaining where you found the link.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">When researching this metric the \"</span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 15.2px;\">Year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\" field should be set to the<strong> year that you are completing this research.</strong></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2149,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1473,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_statement_homepage_link.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+MSA_homepage_link_archived+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12536930,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA registry submission",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_registry_submission.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA registry submission",
      "question": "Does the company provide their modern statement to one or both of the national modern slavery registries?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Both the UK and Australian MSA require that the statements are visible and easily accessible to the public. Under the Australian Act companies are mandated to submit their statements to the central, government run register. In the UK there is now also a central government run register, but submission is not (yet) mandatory. Instead companies are mandated under the UK Act to publish a link to their most recent statement on their homepage. These homepage links are tracked through another research metric on Wikirate: https://wikirate.org/Business_Human_Rights_Resource_Centre+MSA_homepage_link</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The data for this metric is gathered and add to Wikirate through semi-automated techniques (no manual research is needed). It is retrieved directly from the UK and Australian modern slavery registries on a quarterly basis. Annually, a new mapping exercise is done to match the companies in the Wikirate database to the databases of the registries.</p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https://modern-slavery-statement-registry.service.gov.uk/\">https://modern-slavery-statement-registry.service.gov.uk/</a></p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https://modernslaveryregister.gov.au/\">https://modernslaveryregister.gov.au/</a> </p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "UK Registry submission",
        "Australian Registry submission",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Registry Submission",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 63910,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 25869,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Statement_Publication.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_Registry_Submission.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_registry_submission+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12552057,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Statement Publication",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Statement_Publication.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Statement Publication",
      "question": "Does the company either publish their statement on their homepage (UK) or provide the statement to the registry (Australia)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">MSA requires that the statements are visible and easily accessible to the public.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Under the <strong>UK Act</strong>, this means that the statement should be available on the website of a particular company, and ideally that there must be a prominent link to this statement on the homepage or landing page of the company’s website. For further information on publishing the statement please refer to the <a href=\"https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/471996/Transparency_in_Supply_Chains_etc__A_practical_guide__final_.pdf\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;\">Home Office Guidance, page 15</a>.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Under the <strong>Australian Act</strong>, it means that companies should submit their statements to the central, government run [[https://modernslaveryregister.gov.au/|Modern Slavery Register]].</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\"><br><br><br></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var accepted;\n\n  accepted = [\"Australian Registry submission\"];\n\n  if ((isKnown(submission) && accepted.some(function(v) {\n    return submission.indexOf(v) >= 0;\n  })) || homepage === \"Yes\") {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~12536930",
          "name": "submission"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~7046195",
          "name": "homepage"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 73463,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 27603,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Modern_Slavery_Statement.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Statement_Publication+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12601871,
      "name": "Walk Free+Meets Minimum Australian MSA Requirements",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Meets Minimum Australian MSA Requirements",
      "question": "Does the company meet the minimum legal requirements of the Australian Modern Slavery Act?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Under the Australian Act, a company is compliant if it's Australian Modern Slavery statement meets all of the following criteria:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>has <strong>submitted their statement to the Australian Modern Slavery Register</strong></li>\r\n<li>has been <strong>approved by the Board</strong></li>\r\n<li>has been <strong>signed by the appropriate person</strong></li>\r\n<li>describes its <strong>organizational structure</strong> AND/OR discloses details about its <strong>supply chain</strong></li>\r\n<li>describes a modern slavery <strong>policy</strong> <span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">AND/OR <strong>remediation</strong> strategy </span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">AND/OR an <strong>incident of modern slavery</strong> that they have identified </span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">AND/OR a <strong>whistleblowing mechanism</strong></span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">describes how they do their <strong>risk assessment</strong> </span>AND/OR r<strong>isk management</strong> AND/OR what <strong>risks they have identified</strong></li>\r\n<li>describes <strong>KPIs for monitoring the affectiveness</strong> of their anti-slavery policies and actions AND/OR <strong>business KPIs</strong> that monitor if changes to their business are increasing or decreasing the risk of modern slavery occuring</li>\r\n<li>describes how they have <strong>consulted with their owned/controlled entities</strong></li>\r\n</ol>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Yes - but non-AUS statement",
        "Yes - but statement partially assessed",
        "No",
        "No - but statement partially assessed",
        "No - but non-AUS statement",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var c1, c10, c11, c12, c13, c14, c15, c16, c17, c18, c19, c2, c3, c4, c5, c6, c7, c8, c9, grievance_mechanism_accepted_values, incident_remediation_accepted_values, policy_revised_not_accepted_values, risk_assessment_accepted_values, risk_identification_accepted_values, risk_management_accepted_values, signature_accepted_values, supply_chain_disclosure_accepted_values;\n\n  signature_accepted_values = [\"Signed by CEO\", \"Signed by Director\", \"Signed by Managing Director\", \"Signed by Chairman\"];\n\n  supply_chain_disclosure_accepted_values = [\"Geographical\", \"Facility/Supplier\"];\n\n  risk_identification_accepted_values = [\"Geographic\", \"Resource\", \"Workforce\", \"Industry\"];\n\n  incident_remediation_accepted_values = [\"Worker remediation\", \"Corrective action plan\", \"Senior management\", \"Cancel contracts\", \"Remediation is mentioned but no details of the process or measures\"];\n\n  grievance_mechanism_accepted_values = [\"Hotline (direct employees)\", \"Hotline (supply chain workers)\", \"Whistleblower protection (direct employees)\", \"Whistleblower protection (supply chain workers)\", \"Focal Point (direct employees)\", \"Focal Point (supply chain workers)\"];\n\n  risk_assessment_accepted_values = [\"Risk-based questionnaires\", \"Use of risk management tool or software\", \"Conducting research\"];\n\n  risk_management_accepted_values = [\"Audits of suppliers (self- reporting)\", \"Audits of suppliers (independent)\", \"On-site visits (self- reporting)\", \"On-site visits (independent)\"];\n\n  policy_revised_not_accepted_values = [\"No\", \"In Development\"];\n\n  c1 = signature_accepted_values.includes(signature);\n\n  c2 = board_approval === \"Approved by Board\";\n\n  c3 = registry_submission === \"Yes\";\n\n  c4 = organizational_structure === \"Yes\";\n\n  c5 = supply_chain_disclosure_accepted_values.some((function(_this) {\n    return function(v) {\n      return supply_chain_disclosure.indexOf(v) >= 0;\n    };\n  })(this));\n\n  c6 = risk_identification_accepted_values.some((function(_this) {\n    return function(v) {\n      return risk_identification.indexOf(v) >= 0;\n    };\n  })(this));\n\n  c7 = grievance_mechanism_accepted_values.some((function(_this) {\n    return function(v) {\n      return grievance_mechanism.indexOf(v) >= 0;\n    };\n  })(this));\n\n  c8 = kpis_effectiveness === \"Yes\";\n\n  c9 = consultation_process === \"Yes\";\n\n  c10 = risk_assessment_accepted_values.some((function(_this) {\n    return function(v) {\n      return risk_assessment.indexOf(v) >= 0;\n    };\n  })(this));\n\n  c11 = risk_management_accepted_values.some((function(_this) {\n    return function(v) {\n      return risk_management.indexOf(v) >= 0;\n    };\n  })(this));\n\n  c12 = incident_remediation_accepted_values.some((function(_this) {\n    return function(v) {\n      return incident_remediation.indexOf(v) >= 0;\n    };\n  })(this));\n\n  c13 = assessed_statement === \"Yes\";\n\n  c14 = isKnown(statement) && (statement.includes(\"Yes - UK Modern Slavery Act\"));\n\n  c15 = isKnown(statement) && (statement.includes(\"Yes - Australian Modern Slavery Act\"));\n\n  c16 = isKnown(statement) && (statement.includes(\"Yes - California Transparency in Supply\"));\n\n  c17 = kpis_business === \"Yes\";\n\n  c18 = !policy_revised_not_accepted_values.includes(policy_revised);\n\n  c19 = incidents_identified === \"Yes\";\n\n  if (c1 && c2 && c3 && (c4 || c5) && (c18 || c12 || c19 || c7) && (c10 || c11 || c6) && (c8 || c17) && c9) {\n    if (c13 && c15) {\n      \"Yes\";\n    } else if (c14 || c16) {\n      \"Yes - but non-AUS statement\";\n    } else {\n      \"Yes - but statement partially assessed\";\n    }\n  } else if (c15) {\n    if (c13) {\n      \"No\";\n    } else {\n      \"No - but statement partially assessed\";\n    }\n  } else if (c14 || c16) {\n    \"No - but non-AUS statement\";\n  } else {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1831852",
          "name": "signature"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1827915",
          "name": "board_approval"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~5454264",
          "name": "organizational_structure"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1831908",
          "name": "supply_chain_disclosure"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1831932",
          "name": "risk_identification"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722223",
          "name": "risk_assessment"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722169",
          "name": "risk_management"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722444",
          "name": "incident_remediation"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722458",
          "name": "grievance_mechanism"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1832024",
          "name": "kpis_effectiveness"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~8772491",
          "name": "consultation_process"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~12602630",
          "name": "assessed_statement"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~12621116",
          "name": "registry_submission"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1827651",
          "name": "statement"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722057",
          "name": "policy_revised"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1832012",
          "name": "kpis_business"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1831964",
          "name": "incidents_identified"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1147,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 693,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+AUS_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12601980,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA reporting threshold",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_reporting_threshold.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA reporting threshold",
      "question": "Is the company's turnover (UK) or revenue (Australian) under or over the threshold that determines whether a company is mandated to report or does so voluntarily? ",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Under",
        "Over"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (turnover === \"Under £36 million\" || revenue === \"AU$ 0-99M\") {\n    \"Under\";\n  } else {\n    \"Over\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~8218724",
          "name": "turnover"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~8228714",
          "name": "revenue"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_reporting_threshold+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12601994,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Sector",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Sector.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Sector",
      "question": "Which sector(s) is the company part of under the Beyond Compliance project?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Garment",
        "Financial",
        "Hospitality",
        "Other"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (org_sectors.includes(\"Fashion/ textiles/ apparel and luxury goods\" || ind_sectors.includes(\"Fashion/ textiles/ apparel and luxury goods\"))) {\n    \"Garment\";\n  } else if (org_sectors.includes(\"Consumer services/ including accommodation/ hospitality/ tourism and leisure\" || ind_sectors.includes(\"Consumer services/ including accommodation/ hospitality/ tourism and leisure\"))) {\n    \"Hospitality\";\n  } else if (org_sectors.includes(\"Financial/ insurance and real estate activities\" || ind_sectors.includes(\"Financial/ insurance and real estate activities\"))) {\n    \"Financial\";\n  } else {\n    \"Other\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~8218714",
          "name": "org_sectors"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~8228797",
          "name": "ind_sectors"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12602030,
      "name": "UNFCCC secretariat (UN Climate Change)+Signatory Fashion Industry Charter for Climate Action",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/UNFCCC_secretariat_UN_Climate_Change+Signatory_Fashion_Industry_Charter_for_Climate_Action.json",
      "designer": "UNFCCC secretariat (UN Climate Change)",
      "title": "Signatory Fashion Industry Charter for Climate Action",
      "question": "Is the company a signatory of the Fashion Industry Charter for Climate Action?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Signatories to the Fashion Industry Charter for Climate Action are committed to support the implementation of the principles contained in it, both by pursuing the principles within their own organizations and by working collectively with other Signatories.</p>\r\n<p>Organizations, also professionally engaged in the fashion sector, that are in a position to substantially contribute to the realization of the Fashion Industry Charter for Climate Action may also participate in this work. It is recognized that the Supporting Organizations are committed to the principles of the Fashion Industry Charter for Climate Action but that they may not be in a position to apply and implement all of them within their own organizations.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Source: https://unfccc.int/climate-action/sectoral-engagement/global-climate-action-in-fashion/fashion-industry-charter-for-climate-action/participants-in-the-fashion-industry-charter-for-climate-action#eq-2</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Member List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/UNFCCC_secretariat_UN_Climate_Change+Signatory_Fashion_Industry_Charter_for_Climate_Action+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12602527,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Beyond Compliance Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Beyond Compliance Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What is the companies' disclosure rate on the metrics formulated based on either the UK home office statutory guidance accompanying the UK Modern Slavery Act or the Australian Modern Slavery Act guidance?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "/15",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Walk Free+MSA Beyond Compliance Disclosure Rate+Abigail Munroe"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var c1, c10, c11, c12, c13, c14, c15, c16, c2, c3, c5, c6, c7, c8, c9, grievance_mechanism_accepted_values, incidents_remediation_accepted_values, policies_accepted_values, risk_assessment_accepted_values, risk_identification_accepted_values, risk_management_accepted_values, signature_accepted_values, supply_chain_disclosure_accepted_values, training_accepted_values;\n\n  signature_accepted_values = [\"Signed by CEO\", \"Signed by Director\", \"Signed by Managing Director\", \"Signed by Chairman\"];\n\n  supply_chain_disclosure_accepted_values = [\"Geographical\", \"Facility/Supplier\"];\n\n  risk_identification_accepted_values = [\"Geographic\", \"Resource\", \"Workforce\", \"Industry\"];\n\n  incidents_remediation_accepted_values = [\"Worker remediation\", \"Corrective action plan\", \"Senior management\", \"Cancel contracts\"];\n\n  grievance_mechanism_accepted_values = [\"Hotline (direct employees)\", \"Hotline (supply chain workers)\", \"Whistleblower protection (direct employees)\", \"Whistleblower protection (supply chain workers)\", \"Focal Point (direct employees)\", \"Focal Point (supply chain workers)\"];\n\n  policies_accepted_values = [\"Suppliers comply with laws and company’s policies (direct / tier 1)\", \"Suppliers comply with laws and company’s policies (beyond tier 1)\", \"Prohibit use of forced labour (direct / tier 1)\", \"Prohibit use of forced labour (beyond tier 1)\", \"Code of conduct or supplier code includes clauses on slavery and human trafficking (direct / tier 1)\", \"Code of conduct or supplier code includes clauses on slavery and human trafficking (beyond tier 1)\", \"Contracts include clauses on forced labour (direct / tier 1)\", \"Contracts include clauses on forced labour (beyond tier 1)\", \"Suppliers produce their own statement (direct / tier 1)\", \"Suppliers produce their own statement (beyond tier 1)\", \"Prohibit charging of recruitment fees to employee (direct / tier 1)\", \"Prohibit charging of recruitment fees to employee (beyond tier 1)\", \"Prohibit use of child labour (direct / tier 1)\", \"Prohibit use of child labour (beyond tier 1)\", \"Suppliers protect migrant workers (direct / tier 1)\", \"Suppliers protect migrant workers (beyond tier 1)\", \"Suppliers respect labour rights (wages / freedom of association etc) (direct / tier 1)\", \"Suppliers respect labour rights (wages / freedom of association etc) (beyond tier 1)\"];\n\n  risk_assessment_accepted_values = [\"Risk-based questionnaires\", \"Use of risk management tool or software\", \"Conducting research\"];\n\n  risk_management_accepted_values = [\"Audits of suppliers (self- reporting)\", \"Audits of suppliers (independent)\", \"On-site visits (self- reporting)\", \"On-site visits (independent)\"];\n\n  training_accepted_values = [\"Employees (all)\", \"Procurement / purchasing\", \"Recruitment / HR\", \"Leadership\", \"Suppliers\", \"Training provided - not specified to who\"];\n\n  c1 = signature_accepted_values.includes(signature);\n\n  c2 = board_approval === \"Approved by Board\";\n\n  c3 = statement_publication === \"Yes\";\n\n  c5 = organizational_structure === \"Yes\";\n\n  c6 = supply_chain_disclosure_accepted_values.some((function(_this) {\n    return function(v) {\n      return supply_chain_disclosure.indexOf(v) >= 0;\n    };\n  })(this));\n\n  c7 = policies_accepted_values.some((function(_this) {\n    return function(v) {\n      return policies.indexOf(v) >= 0;\n    };\n  })(this));\n\n  c8 = risk_assessment_accepted_values.some((function(_this) {\n    return function(v) {\n      return risk_assessment.indexOf(v) >= 0;\n    };\n  })(this));\n\n  c9 = risk_identification_accepted_values.some((function(_this) {\n    return function(v) {\n      return risk_identification.indexOf(v) >= 0;\n    };\n  })(this));\n\n  c10 = risk_management_accepted_values.some((function(_this) {\n    return function(v) {\n      return risk_management.indexOf(v) >= 0;\n    };\n  })(this));\n\n  c11 = grievance_mechanism_accepted_values.some((function(_this) {\n    return function(v) {\n      return grievance_mechanism.indexOf(v) >= 0;\n    };\n  })(this));\n\n  c12 = incidents_identified === \"Yes\";\n\n  c13 = incidents_remediation_accepted_values.some((function(_this) {\n    return function(v) {\n      return incidents_remediation.indexOf(v) >= 0;\n    };\n  })(this));\n\n  c14 = training_accepted_values.some((function(_this) {\n    return function(v) {\n      return training.indexOf(v) >= 0;\n    };\n  })(this));\n\n  c15 = effectiveness_kpis === \"Yes\";\n\n  c16 = business_kpis === \"Yes\";\n\n  [c1, c2, c3, c5, c6, c7, c8, c9, c10, c11, c12, c13, c14, c15, c16].filter(Boolean).length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~1831852",
          "name": "signature"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~1827915",
          "name": "board_approval"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~12552057",
          "name": "statement_publication"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~5454264",
          "name": "organizational_structure"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~1831908",
          "name": "supply_chain_disclosure"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~2722057",
          "name": "policies"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~2722223",
          "name": "risk_assessment"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~1831932",
          "name": "risk_identification"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~2722169",
          "name": "risk_management"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~2722458",
          "name": "grievance_mechanism"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~1831964",
          "name": "incidents_identified"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~2722444",
          "name": "incidents_remediation"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~2722482",
          "name": "training"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~1832024",
          "name": "effectiveness_kpis"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~1832012",
          "name": "business_kpis"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2538,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1584,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate+Abigail_Munroe.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12602618,
      "name": "Walk Free+UK MSA statement assessed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "UK MSA statement assessed",
      "question": "Has the company's UK Modern Slavery Act statement been assessed against the Beyond Compliance project metrics?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially assessed",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if ((statement.includes(\"Yes - UK Modern Slavery Act\")) && isKnown(signature) && isKnown(board_approval) && isKnown(organizational_structure) && isKnown(supply_chain_disclosure) && isKnown(policies) && isKnown(risk_assessment) && isKnown(risk_identification) && isKnown(risk_management) && isKnown(grievance_mechanism) && isKnown(incidents_identified) && isKnown(incidents_remediation) && isKnown(training) && isKnown(effectiveness_kpis) && isKnown(business_kpis)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if ((statement.includes(\"Yes - UK Modern Slavery Act\")) && (isKnown(signature) || isKnown(board_approval) || isKnown(organizational_structure) || isKnown(supply_chain_disclosure) || isKnown(policies) || isKnown(risk_assessment) || isKnown(risk_identification) || isKnown(risk_management) || isKnown(grievance_mechanism) || isKnown(incidents_identified) || isKnown(incidents_remediation) || isKnown(training) || isKnown(effectiveness_kpis) || isKnown(business_kpis))) {\n    \"Partially assessed\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1827651",
          "name": "statement"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1831852",
          "name": "signature"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1827915",
          "name": "board_approval"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~5454264",
          "name": "organizational_structure"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1831908",
          "name": "supply_chain_disclosure"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722057",
          "name": "policies"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722223",
          "name": "risk_assessment"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1831932",
          "name": "risk_identification"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722169",
          "name": "risk_management"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722458",
          "name": "grievance_mechanism"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1831964",
          "name": "incidents_identified"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722444",
          "name": "incidents_remediation"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722482",
          "name": "training"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1832024",
          "name": "effectiveness_kpis"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1832012",
          "name": "business_kpis"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 72379,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 27413,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_UK_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+UK_MSA_statement_assessed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12602630,
      "name": "Walk Free+Australian MSA statement assessed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_statement_assessed.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Australian MSA statement assessed",
      "question": "Has the company's Australian Modern Slavery Act statement been assessed against the Beyond Compliance project metrics?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially assessed",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if ((statement.includes(\"Yes - Australian Modern Slavery Act\")) && isKnown(signature) && isKnown(board_approval) && isKnown(organizational_structure) && isKnown(supply_chain_disclosure) && isKnown(policies) && isKnown(risk_assessment) && isKnown(risk_identification) && isKnown(risk_management) && isKnown(grievance_mechanism) && isKnown(incidents_identified) && isKnown(incidents_remediation) && isKnown(training) && isKnown(effectiveness_kpis) && isKnown(business_kpis) && isKnown(consultation_process)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if ((statement.includes(\"Yes - Australian Modern Slavery Act\")) && (isKnown(signature) || isKnown(board_approval) || isKnown(organizational_structure) || isKnown(supply_chain_disclosure) || isKnown(policies) || isKnown(risk_assessment) || isKnown(risk_identification) || isKnown(risk_management) || isKnown(grievance_mechanism) || isKnown(incidents_identified) || isKnown(incidents_remediation) || isKnown(training) || isKnown(effectiveness_kpis) || isKnown(business_kpis) || isKnown(consultation_process))) {\n    \"Partially assessed\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1827651",
          "name": "statement"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1831852",
          "name": "signature"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1827915",
          "name": "board_approval"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~5454264",
          "name": "organizational_structure"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1831908",
          "name": "supply_chain_disclosure"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722057",
          "name": "policies"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722223",
          "name": "risk_assessment"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1831932",
          "name": "risk_identification"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722169",
          "name": "risk_management"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722458",
          "name": "grievance_mechanism"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1831964",
          "name": "incidents_identified"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722444",
          "name": "incidents_remediation"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2722482",
          "name": "training"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1832024",
          "name": "effectiveness_kpis"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1832012",
          "name": "business_kpis"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown-Value",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~8772491",
          "name": "consultation_process"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 72379,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 27413,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_statement_assessed.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_statement_assessed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12610074,
      "name": "Vectoria.org+Women in management/leadership positions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Vectoria_org+Women_in_management_leadership_positions.json",
      "designer": "Vectoria.org",
      "title": "Women in management/leadership positions",
      "question": "What percentage of management / leadership positions are filled by women?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify; line-height: normal;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', 'serif';\">The UN has identified 9 targets and 15 indicators for progress in SDG 5. Indicator 5.5.2 is the \"proportion of women in managerial positions\". This is measured as the percentage of firms in any given country with a female as the top manager and the share of middle or senior management positions filled by a female. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify; line-height: normal;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', 'serif';\">Goal by 2030: \"ensure women´s full and effective participation and equal opportunities for leadership at all levels of decision-making in political life\"</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Researchers may find the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 1rem;\">the percentage of management /leadership positions filled by women</span> by reviewing <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">company statements for search terms like \"female representation\", \"female leadership\", \"women manager\", \"women\",''gender diversity\", \"inclusion &amp; diversity\" to determine whether the company in question publicly discloses </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">this information.</span></p>\r\n<p>Sources of information: Annual Reports, CSR Reports, the company website.</p>\r\n<p>If found, cite the correct source and include the <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">page number </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">where the information can be found </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">and any additional context in the Comments field as type of information founded (leadership, manager positions, directors+managers).</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">If information founded is numerical it must be transformed in percentage and the data must be included in the Comments.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Vectoria_org+Women_in_management_leadership_positions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12612042,
      "name": "Commons+WBA SDG2000 List",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+WBA_SDG2000_List.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "WBA SDG2000 List",
      "question": "Is the company on the World Benchmarking Alliance SDG2000 list?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>\"The private sector is critical to achieving the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. The SDG2000 list identifies the 2,000 most influential companies, from Algeria to Vietnam. These are the companies that are going to shape our future. In the coming years through benchmarking, WBA’s benchmarks can promote a ‘race to the top’ in which leaders are motivated to do more and laggards are held to account. This information will be free and available for everyone.\" </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+WBA_SDG2000_List+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12613570,
      "name": "Laureen van Breen+Scope 1 GHG over number of employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Laureen_van_Breen+Scope_1_GHG_over_number_of_employees.json",
      "designer": "Laureen van Breen",
      "title": "Scope 1 GHG over number of employees",
      "question": "What is the amount of scope 1 GHG emissions relative to the number of employees?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric calculates how many metric tonnes of direct (scope 1) CO2 emissions the company emits, per employee. This give as sense of it's emissions relative to the size of their organization.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "metric tonnes of GHG per employee",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  GHG / Employee;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~3437227",
          "name": "Employee"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~826615",
          "name": "GHG"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3803,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1339,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Laureen_van_Breen+Scope_1_GHG_over_number_of_employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12614108,
      "name": "Commons+Child Labour Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Child_Labour_Policy.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Child Labour Policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available Child Labour Policy?\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Child labor refers to work that deprives children of their childhood and affects their schooling, their potential and their dignity. It’s work that’s harmful to them mentally, physically and socially.</p>\r\n<p>Every company is expected to make a public commitment to respect internationally recognised human rights, which include the right to be free from child labour. Not all companies are expected to have a stand alone policy on child labour. Whatever approach a company chooses, it should reflect its potential involvement with child labour risks. For instance, a company in an industry with significant and widespread child labour risks may choose to develop a separate child labour statement. Regardless of what form it takes,the commitment should be embedded throughout the organization, which means drivingrespect for human rights across the organization and into its business values and culture.</p>\r\n<p>ILO CHILD LABOUR [[https://www.ilo.org/ipec/Informationresources/WCMS_IPEC_PUB_27555/lang--en/index.htm|Guidance]] TOOL FOR BUSINESS</p>",
      "methodology": "<div>\r\n<p>This metric captures whether companies have a Child Labour Policy, and if so, if it is easily accessible. Companies may use another name for this policy – such as “Child and Forced Labour” or \"Anti-Child Labour Policy\".</p>\r\n<p>The policy will typically be available in on a company's website. The policy may sometimes form part of a more general company policy (e.g., on human rights).</p>\r\n<p>If you can find a Child Labour Policy for a company, set their value to “<strong>Yes</strong>” and add the source. </p>\r\n<p>Where applicable, you should also say whether the company has a stand-alone policy on Child Labour Policy, or whether it forms part of a more general company policy (for example, on human rights). If the company's policy is not a stand-alone document but included within another document, you should set their value to \"<strong>partial</strong>\".</p>\r\n<p>If you can't find a Child Labour Policy for a company, you should set their value on this metric to “<strong>No</strong>” and include some details of how/where you searched as a “Report” source.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n</div>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Partial"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Child_Labour_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12615795,
      "name": "Commons+Responsible Subcontracting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Responsible_Subcontracting.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Responsible Subcontracting",
      "question": "Does the brand have a policy that addresses subcontracting in the supply chain?\r\n\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Subcontracting is the practice of assigning, or outsourcing, part of the obligations and tasks under a contract to another party known as a subcontractor.</p>\r\n<p>Subcontracting is especially prevalent in areas where complex projects are the norm, such as construction and information technology. Subcontractors are hired by the project's general contractor, who continues to have overall responsibility for project completion and execution within its stipulated parameters and deadlines.</p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\">Source. [[https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/subcontracting.asp|Investopedia 2022]]</p>\r\n<p>Responsible businesses can ensure that their subcontracted workers are paid a livable wage, receive equitable benefits, have the right to a voice at work without fear of discrimination or retaliation, do not suffer mass layoffs when contracts change hands, and are protected from misclassification and other forms of wage theft.</p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\">Source [[https://www.wpusa.org/files/reports/TechsInvisibleWorkforce.pdf|Working Partnerships USA. ]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Visit the company's website or conduct a browser search to find a Sustainability Report or any information sustainability policies that address subcontracting in the supply chain.</p>\r\n<p>Once an answer is found, select one of the answer options for the correct year you are researching, and submit.</p>\r\n<p>If you find a Subcontracting Policy for a company, set their value to <strong>Yes</strong> and add the source. </p>\r\n<p>If the company mentions its approach to subcontracting as part of a more general company policy (for example, a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics), set its value to <strong>Partial</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>If you cannot find a Subcontracting Policy for a company, you should set their value on this metric to <strong>No</strong> and include some details of how/where you searched as a Report source.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>*Unknown is only a correct answer if no reporting is found.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supply Chain Policy document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 11,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 11,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Responsible_Subcontracting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12616714,
      "name": "Walk Free+Garment Sector",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Garment_Sector.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Garment Sector",
      "question": "Is the company considered to be part of the garment sector?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric checks whether a company that has produced a Modern Slavery statement, is part of the garment sector.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Standard",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var c1, c2, c3, c4;\n\n  c1 = m1.includes(\"Fashion/ textiles/ apparel and luxury goods\");\n\n  c2 = m2.includes(\"Fashion/ textiles/ apparel and luxury goods\");\n\n  c3 = m3.includes(\"Textiles and Apparel\");\n\n  c4 = m4.includes(\"Apparel & Textiles\");\n\n  if (statement.includes(\"No - neither\")) {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  } else if (c1 || c2 || c3 || c4) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~8218714",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~8228797",
          "name": "m2"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~887007",
          "name": "m3"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~6248523",
          "name": "m4"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1827651",
          "name": "statement"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 72168,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 27340,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Garment_Sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12616745,
      "name": "Walk Free+Hospitality Sector",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Hospitality_Sector.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Hospitality Sector",
      "question": "Is the company considered to be part of the hospitality sector?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">This metric checks whether a company that has produced a Modern Slavery statement, is part of the hospitality sector.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Standard",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var c1, c2, c3;\n\n  c1 = m1.includes(\"Hospitality & Recreation\");\n\n  c2 = m2.includes(\"Consumer services/ including accommodation/ hospitality/ tourism and leisure\");\n\n  c3 = m3.includes(\"Consumer services/ including accommodation/ hospitality/ tourism and leisure\");\n\n  if (c1 || c2 || c3) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~6248523",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~8218714",
          "name": "m2"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~8228797",
          "name": "m3"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1827651",
          "name": "statement"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 72170,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 27339,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Hospitality_Sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12616761,
      "name": "Walk Free+Financial Services Sector",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Financial_Services_Sector.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Financial Services Sector",
      "question": "Is the company considered to be part of the financial services sector?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">This metric checks whether a company that has produced a Modern Slavery statement, is part of the financial services sector.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Standard",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var c1, c2, c3, c4, c5, c6, c7;\n\n  c1 = m1.includes(\"Financial/ insurance and real estate activities\");\n\n  c2 = m2.includes(\"Financial/ insurance and real estate activities\");\n\n  c3 = m3.includes(\"Financials\");\n\n  c4 = m4.includes(\"Financial Services\");\n\n  c5 = m5.includes(\"Yes - Asset Owner\");\n\n  c6 = m5.includes(\"Yes - Investment Manager\");\n\n  c7 = m5.includes(\"Yes - Service Provider\");\n\n  if (statement.includes(\"No - neither\")) {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  } else if (c1 || c2 || c3 || c4 || c5 || c6 || c7) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~8218714",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~8228797",
          "name": "m2"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~6248523",
          "name": "m3"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~887007",
          "name": "m4"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1827651",
          "name": "statement"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~5645712",
          "name": "m5"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 72170,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 27338,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Financial_Services_Sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12616892,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Policy (grouped)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Policy_grouped.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Policy (grouped)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Direct Supply Chain",
        "Beyond Tier 1 Supply Chain",
        "Both",
        "Neither"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (beyond_tier_1 === \"Yes\" && direct === \"Yes\") {\n    \"Both\";\n  } else if (beyond_tier_1 === \"Yes\") {\n    \"Beyond Tier 1 Supply Chain\";\n  } else if (direct === \"Yes\") {\n    \"Direct Supply Chain\";\n  } else {\n    \"Neither\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6915846",
          "name": "beyond_tier_1"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~6915857",
          "name": "direct"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3934,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2339,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Policy_grouped+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12620676,
      "name": "Walk Free+AUS MSA Beyond Compliance Disclosure Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+AUS_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "AUS MSA Beyond Compliance Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What is the companies' disclosure rate on the 4 metrics formulated based on the statutory guidance accompanying the Australian Modern Slavery Act?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Based on the statutory guidance, 4 metrics were formulated which go beyond the minimum requirements of the Australian Modern Slavery Act, looking for disclosure on the due diligence measures and actions that the Australian government urges companies to report on.  This metric assesses how many of those 4 elements a company provides more information on.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Formula logic:</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">From the total amount of metrics (4), count the number of metrics that have not been disclosed to in the company's Modern Slavery statement (<span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">\"No\" if not present in the statement or \"Unknown\" if no statement could be found)</span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">. </span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "/4",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (meets_minimum_aus_requirements === \"Yes\") {\n    [policy, incidentsID, training, bizKPI].filter(function(v) {\n      return [v].flat()[0] !== \"No\";\n    }).length;\n  } else {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "No",
          "metric": "~2722057",
          "name": "policy"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "No",
          "metric": "~1831964",
          "name": "incidentsID"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "No",
          "metric": "~2722482",
          "name": "training"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "No",
          "metric": "~1832012",
          "name": "bizKPI"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12601871",
          "name": "meets_minimum_aus_requirements"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1130,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 676,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+AUS_MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12620974,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Beyond Compliance",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Beyond Compliance",
      "question": "Does the company disclose any information that goes beyond the minimum requirements of the modern slavery legislation that it is reporting to (UK or Australian)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (UK > 0 || AUS > 0) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~6899063",
          "name": "UK"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~12620676",
          "name": "AUS"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2749,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1650,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12621044,
      "name": "Walk Free+MS User policy (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MS_User_policy_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MS User policy (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose in its modern slavery statement that it has a modern slavery policy covering any social media platforms it owns or distributes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Clear organisational policies help set the tone in assessing, preventing, and mitigating the risk of, and working to influence and remedy, modern slavery. Businesses have a responsibility to prevent or mitigate adverse impacts linked to their operations, products or services (UN Guiding Principles). Policies covering social media platforms should be established to detect, prevent, and remedy modern slavery that occurs through use of the platform. It also helps to demonstrate a company’s commitment to tackling modern slavery.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is assessing <strong>whether policies exist to combat modern slavery that occurs on the social media platform</strong>, <strong>not</strong> organisational policies on modern slavery that do not mention whether they apply to the social media platform and its users.</p>\r\n<p><strong>For example,</strong> the policy states that use of the social media platform to facilitate modern slavery/exploitation is prohibited, or content or behaviours that may lead to modern slavery are prohibited.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> Users may include non-paying users, paying users (customers) such as businesses paying to advertise or recruit, and developers (individuals or companies) who build applications for social media platforms. </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 16px;\">\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">April </span>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">May</span> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 27,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MS_User_policy_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12621057,
      "name": "Walk Free+Detecting MS on social media (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Detecting_MS_on_social_media_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Detecting MS on social media (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose in its modern slavery statement that it seeks to detect modern slavery on any social media platforms it owns or distributes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>Companies must undertake efforts to detect instances of modern slavery that occur through the use of any social media platforms it owns or distributes. This enables the company to take targeted action against modern slavery and address risk factors to prevent future incidents. Efforts to detect modern slavery should consider the language and geographic spread of platform users.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric assesses whether the <strong>company </strong>discloses in its modern slavery statement that it <strong>seeks to detect modern slavery on any social media platforms it owns or distributes</strong>.</p>\r\n<p><strong>For example</strong>, they have a dedicated team to actively monitor content for indicators of modern slavery; they use AI to detect modern-slavery related content; they have mechanisms for users to report modern slavery risks or incidents.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Select as many answer options as apply.</strong></p>\r\n<p>Select ‘<strong>in development’</strong> when the company does not explicitly state that it actively detects risk, but instead uses terms like ‘investing in’ or ‘building’/‘in the process’ of adopting tools to detect risk.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> the core [[https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_risk_assessment|MSA risk assessment]] metric assesses whether the company discloses how it assesses the risk of slavery and trafficking in its supply chain. <strong>This metric is asking specifically whether the company discloses how it detects risks of modern slavery on the social media platform itself.</strong></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 16px;\">\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">April </span>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">May</span> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - A dedicated team monitors for indicators of modern slavery",
        "Yes - The company uses AI or technology to detect modern slavery",
        "Yes - Users can report modern-slavery related content",
        "Yes - Users can report that themselves or someone else is in a situation of modern slavery",
        "Yes - Other",
        "In Development",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 27,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Detecting_MS_on_social_media_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12621070,
      "name": "Walk Free+Social media incidents remediation (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Social_media_incidents_remediation_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Social media incidents remediation (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose in its modern slavery statement any actions taken in response to modern slavery incidents identified or reported on any social media platforms it owns or distributes? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>Should a company find instances of modern slavery occurring on its social media platform, the company has a responsibility to respect the human rights of those affected, and should take steps to investigate and ‘provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes’ (</span><span><a href=\"https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf\"><span>UN Guiding Principles</span></a></span><span>). This can include cooperating with law enforcement, removing violating content, or referring affected users to support services. Content removal should be accompanied by efforts to investigate and remove the source of risk to prevent future occurrences.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The metric assesses whether the <strong>company discloses</strong> in its modern slavery statement <strong>any actions taken in response to modern slavery incidents identified or reported on any social media platforms it owns or distributes.</strong></p>\r\n<p><strong>For example</strong>, the company cooperates with law enforcement (while safeguarding privacy and human rights); the company removes content; the company refers victims to support services.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> this metric is asking specifically whether the company discloses the corrective steps it has taken (or would take) in response to modern slavery<strong> incidents</strong> <strong>occurring on the social media platform itself</strong>.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 16px;\">\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">April </span>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">May</span> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - Cooperates with law enforcement",
        "Yes - Removes content or user accounts or apps",
        "Yes - Remediation for affected users",
        "Yes - Other",
        "In Development",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 27,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Social_media_incidents_remediation_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12621082,
      "name": "Walk Free+Preventing MS on social media (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Preventing_MS_on_social_media_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Preventing MS on social media (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose in their modern slavery statement any steps they have taken to prevent modern slavery risks on social media?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Businesses have a responsibility to prevent or mitigate adverse impacts linked to their operations, products or services (UN Guiding Principles). Companies should undertake efforts to actively identify and prevent potential modern slavery risks among users engaging on their platform. Social media platforms are also uniquely placed to raise awareness among at-risk users. Efforts to prevent risk help to demonstrate a company’s commitment to tackling modern slavery.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric assesses whether the company discloses in their modern slavery statement any steps they have taken to prevent modern slavery, for example, by reducing vulnerability to modern slavery among at-risk users, or introducing modern slavery considerations in the product design and development stages.</p>\r\n<p style=\"margin: 0in 0in 8pt; line-height: 15.6933px; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: #000000;\"> </p>\r\n<p>Note: this metric is looking for disclosure on measures to <strong>actively prevent risks on the platform or reduce vulnerability among users of the social media platform.</strong></p>\r\n<p><strong>Select as many answer options as apply.</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Yes - Raises awareness of risks for users (<strong>e.g.</strong> risks associated with labour migration or online recruitment)</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Yes - Information on support services available for users (<strong>e.g.</strong> resources or ads for anti-slavery organisations or hotlines)</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Yes - Recruitment advertisements and business pages are verified (<strong>e.g.</strong> through research, screening, or risk-based questionnaires)</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Yes - Modern slavery training for software developers</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Yes - Modern slavery guidelines for software developers</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>Yes - Other</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>In Development</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 15.6933px; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: #000000;\">No</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 16px;\">\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">April </span>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">May</span> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"margin: 0in 0in 8pt; line-height: 15.6933px; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: #000000;\"> </p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - Raises awareness of risks for users",
        "Yes - Information on support services available for users",
        "Yes - Recruitment advertisements and business pages are verified",
        "Yes - Modern slavery training for software developers",
        "Yes - Modern slavery guidelines for software developers",
        "Yes - Other",
        "In Development",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 27,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Preventing_MS_on_social_media_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12621093,
      "name": "Walk Free+Initiatives and collaborations (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Initiatives_and_collaborations_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Initiatives and collaborations (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose in its modern slavery statement that it collaborates with industry and non-industry stakeholders to learn from experts and peers and/or lift the industry standard for preventing, identifying, and mitigating modern slavery, labour exploitation and human trafficking risks, and enabling effective remedy for harms caused or contributed to? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>Social media companies should cooperate to lift industry standards, innovate solutions, and ensure that modern slavery risks are not merely displaced to another platform. Such cooperation should also involve meaningful consultation with survivors and anti-slavery experts. Partnerships should have sufficient geographic spread to ensure risk is addressed in different contexts.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric assesses whether the company discloses in its modern slavery statement that it collaborates with industry and non-industry stakeholders to learn from experts and peers and/or lift the industry standard for preventing, identifying, and mitigating modern slavery, labour exploitation and human trafficking risks, and enabling effective remedy for harms caused or contributed to.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Select as many answer options as apply.</strong></p>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> industry initiatives and collaborations must include efforts to combat modern slavery on social media, not collaborations that seek to combat modern slavery in supply chains but do not explicitly mention combatting modern slavery on social media platforms.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 16px;\">\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">April </span>2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">May</span> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - industry stakeholders",
        "Yes - non-industry stakeholders",
        "Yes - survivors",
        "In Development",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 27,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Initiatives_and_collaborations_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12621116,
      "name": "Walk Free+Australian MSA Registry Submission",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_Registry_Submission.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Australian MSA Registry Submission",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if ((isKnown(statement) && (statement.includes(\"Yes - Australian Modern Slavery Act\"))) && (isKnown(registry_submission) && (registry_submission.includes(\"Australian Registry submission\")))) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1827651",
          "name": "statement"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~12536930",
          "name": "registry_submission"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 72831,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 27603,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Australian_MSA_Registry_Submission+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12621772,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA statement assessed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_statement_assessed.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA statement assessed",
      "question": "Has the company's Modern Slavery Act statement been assessed against UK's or Australian's Beyond Compliance project metrics?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (uk_assessed === \"Yes\" || aus_assessed === \"Yes\") {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~12602618",
          "name": "uk_assessed"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~12602630",
          "name": "aus_assessed"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 71023,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 27296,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_statement_assessed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12625086,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Changes to Purchasing Practices (COVID-19 Response)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Changes_to_Purchasing_Practices_COVID_19_Response.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Changes to Purchasing Practices (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose any changes to purchasing practices or supplier agreements as a result of economic pressures of COVID-19?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Brands purchasing practices during Covid-19 have had a huge impact on suppliers' ability to pay workers on time and adequately. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workers across global supply chains.<br>\n<br>\nExamples of changes to purchasing practices changes would include the percentage of orders cancelled or disclosure of any changes to payment terms faced by suppliers (late payments).",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses any changes to purchasing practices or supplier agreements as a result of economic pressures of COVID-19.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Purchasing practices<br>\n- Cancelled orders<br>\n- Late payments",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Changes to Purchasing Practices (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Changes_to_Purchasing_Practices_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Changes_to_Purchasing_Practices_COVID_19_Response+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12625097,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Support Given to Direct Employees and Families (COVID-19 Response)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Support_Given_to_Direct_Employees_and_Families_COVID_19_Response.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Support Given to Direct Employees and Families (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose what types of support, beyond the legal requirements, has been offered to direct employees and their families impacted by COVID-19?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "For example, checking home workspaces were ergonomic, such as the provision of chairs, computers and other work tools, as well as evidence of compensation for expenses for internet use, electricity, etc. and policies around flexible woring hours.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses what types of support, beyond the legal requirements, has been offered to direct employees and their families impacted by COVID-19s.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- COVID-19<br>\n- Homeworking<br>\n- Compensation",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mental Health Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Support Given to Direct Employees and Families (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Support_Given_to_Direct_Employees_and_Families_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Support_Given_to_Direct_Employees_and_Families_COVID_19_Response+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12625108,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Support Offered for Homeworking (COVID-19 Response)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Support_Offered_for_Homeworking_COVID_19_Response.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Support Offered for Homeworking (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose any support or equipment offered to employees during Covid-19 which enabled them to work safely from home where possible?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "As an outcome of the pandemic, some companies implemented work-from-home policies for sections of their workforce. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workforces around the world.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses any support or equipment offered to employees during Covid-19 which enabled them to work safely from home where possible.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- COVID-19<br>\n- Work from home<br>\n- Homeworking",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Support Offered for Homeworking (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Support_Offered_for_Homeworking_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Support_Offered_for_Homeworking_COVID_19_Response+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12625119,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Career Development Mechanisms",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Career_Development_Mechanisms.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Career Development Mechanisms",
      "question": "Does the company disclose information on employee career development programmes or activities focused on helping employees acquire skills, move to higher positions and increase their salaries?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Career development programmes are an important part of supporting employee growth.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses  information on employee career development programmes or activities focused on helping employees acquire skills, move to higher positions and increase their salaries.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Promotion<br>\n- Career development",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Career Development Mechanisms+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Career_Development_Mechanisms+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Career_Development_Mechanisms+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12625130,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Demonstrates Respect for Culture and Heritage of Indigenous and Afro-Mexican Communities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Demonstrates_Respect_for_Culture_and_Heritage_of_Indigenous_and_Afro_Mexican_Communities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Demonstrates Respect for Culture and Heritage of Indigenous and Afro-Mexican Communities",
      "question": "Does the company demonstrate that it respects the intellectual property of the culture and heritage of indigenous and Afro-Mexican communities - through a policy that shows consent, credit and compensation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This question seeks design practices that consider issues of obtaining consent and giving credit and compensation to indigenous and Afro-Mexican communities for any design practices or craftsmanship used in the retailer's designs.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company demonstrates that it respects the intellectual property of the culture and heritage of indigenous and Afro-Mexican communities - through a policy that shows consent, credit and compensation.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Indigenous<br>\n- Intellectual property<br>\n- Heritage<br>\n- Compensation<br>\n- Craftmanship",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Demonstrates Respect for Culture and Heritage of Indigenous and Afro-Mexican Communities+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Demonstrates_Respect_for_Culture_and_Heritage_of_Indigenous_and_Afro_Mexican_Communities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Demonstrates_Respect_for_Culture_and_Heritage_of_Indigenous_and_Afro_Mexican_Communities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12631591,
      "name": "PODER+Women on Board",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/PODER+Women_on_Board.json",
      "designer": "PODER",
      "title": "Women on Board",
      "question": "What percentage of people on the company's board of directors are women?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is capturing the data research by the Women in the Stock Market project, an initiative of the Project on Organization, Development, Education and Research <a href=\"https://www.projectpoder.org/es/\" target=\"_blank\">(PODER)</a> in alliance with <a href=\"https://www.datasketch.co/\" target=\"_blank\">Datasketch</a>, <a href=\"https://cuestionpublica.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Cuestión Pública</a>, <a href=\"https://www.lanacion.com.ar/data\" target=\"_blank\">La Nación</a>, <a href=\"https://elfaro.net/\" target=\"_blank\">El Faro</a>, <a href=\"https://www.plazapublica.com.gt/\" target=\"_blank\">Plaza Pública</a>, <a href=\"https://wayka.pe/\" target=\"_blank\">Wayka</a>, <a href=\"https://semanariouniversidad.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Semanario Universidad</a>, <a href=\"http://www.managuafuriosa.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Managua Furiosa</a>, <a href=\"http://www.lostiempos.com/\">Los Tiempos</a>, <a href=\"https://metrolibre.com/\" target=\"_blank\">Metro Libre</a>, <a href=\"https://ladiaria.com.uy/\" target=\"_blank\">La Diaria</a>, <a href=\"https://elsurti.com/\" target=\"_blank\">El Surtidor</a>, <a href=\"https://www.eldesconcierto.cl/\" target=\"_blank\">El Desconcierto</a>, <a href=\"https://brasil.elpais.com/\" target=\"_blank\">El País</a> y <a href=\"https://tierradenadie.ec/\" target=\"_blank\">Tierra de Nadie</a>, which seeks to make visible the presence of women in decision-making spaces in the private sector.</p>\r\n<p>The project has had two editions 2019 and 2020. <br><br>For 2020, the data used was published by companies listed on the stock exchanges of <strong>Latin America and Spain</strong> on their <strong>boards of directors</strong>. In addition, the Guayaquil Stock Exchange (BVG), Ecuador, and the Institutional Stock Exchange (BIVA) of Mexico were added.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For 2020, the data used was published by companies listed on Latin American and Spanish stock exchanges on their boards of directors. In addition, for Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay, automated scrapers were developed that took the information from the different sources in each country, so we believe that the data is more comprehensive this year.<br><br>If you would like to understand more about the data, have comments or interest in replicating the project, please contact at contacte@mujeresenlabolsa.org.<br><br><br></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 522,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 522,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Women_on_Board.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Women_on_Board.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/PODER+Women_on_Board+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12637606,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Changes to Purchasing Practices (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Changes_to_Purchasing_Practices_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Changes to Purchasing Practices (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Mexico 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Brands purchasing practices during Covid-19 have had a huge impact on suppliers' ability to pay workers on time and adequately. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workers across global supply chains.</p>\r\n<p>Examples of changes to purchasing practices changes would include the percentage of orders cancelled or disclosure of any changes to payment terms faced by suppliers (late payments).</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response_Mexico_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Changes_to_Purchasing_Practices_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12637612,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Support Given to Direct Employees and Families (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Support_Given_to_Direct_Employees_and_Families_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Support Given to Direct Employees and Families (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Mexico 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>For example, checking home workspaces were ergonomic, such as the provision of chairs, computers and other work tools, as well as evidence of compensation for expenses for internet use, electricity, etc. and policies around flexible woring hours.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mental Health Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response_Mexico_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Support_Given_to_Direct_Employees_and_Families_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12637618,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Support Offered for Homeworking (COVID-19 Response)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Support_Offered_for_Homeworking_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Support Offered for Homeworking (COVID-19 Response)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Mexico 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>As an outcome of the pandemic, some companies implemented work-from-home policies for sections of their workforce. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workforces around the world.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>As an outcome of the pandemic, some companies implemented work-from-home policies for sections of their workforce. It is important brands are monitoring and disclosing this information as it helps inform understanding of how Covid-19 response has impacted workforces around the world.</p>",
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response_Mexico_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Support_Offered_for_Homeworking_COVID_19_Response+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12637625,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Career Development Mechanisms+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Career_Development_Mechanisms+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Career Development Mechanisms",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Mexico 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Career development programmes are an important part of supporting employee growth.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_Mexico_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Career_Development_Mechanisms+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12637631,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Demonstrates Respect for Culture and Heritage of Indigenous and Afro-Mexican Communities+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Demonstrates_Respect_for_Culture_and_Heritage_of_Indigenous_and_Afro_Mexican_Communities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Demonstrates Respect for Culture and Heritage of Indigenous and Afro-Mexican Communities",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index Mexico 2021?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>This question seeks design practices that consider issues of obtaining consent and giving credit and compensation to indigenous and Afro-Mexican communities for any design practices or craftsmanship used in the retailer's designs.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Gender_Racial_Equality_Score_Mexico_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Demonstrates_Respect_for_Culture_and_Heritage_of_Indigenous_and_Afro_Mexican_Communities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12637642,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+COVID-19 Response (Mexico 2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response_Mexico_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "COVID-19 Response (Mexico 2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for their COVID-19 Response in the Fashion Transparency Index Mexico 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mental Health Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Emergency Preparedness",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~12637606",
          "weight": 16.66666666666667
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12637612",
          "weight": 33.33333333333333
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12637618",
          "weight": 16.66666666666667
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12153225",
          "weight": 33.33333333333333
        }
      ],
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_Mexico_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+COVID_19_Response_Mexico_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12637658,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.1 Decent Work & Purchasing Practices (Mexico 2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_Mexico_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.1 Decent Work & Purchasing Practices (Mexico 2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5.1 Decent Work & Purchasing Practices in the Fashion Transparency Index Mexico 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p>According to the ILO, working conditions are at the core of decent and dignified work. Generally speaking, working conditions cover a broad range of topics and issues, from working time (hours of work, rest periods, and work schedules) to remuneration, as well as the physical conditions and mental demands that exist in the workplaces. Here, we put the spotlight on some of the more egregious, thorny, endemic or hidden working conditions issues.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mental Health Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Emergency Preparedness",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~12637642",
          "weight": 18.75
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606800",
          "weight": 28.125
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12637625",
          "weight": 6.25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606832",
          "weight": 34.375
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606847",
          "weight": 12.5
        }
      ],
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_Mexico_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_Mexico_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12637666,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.2 Gender & Racial Equality Score (Mexico 2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Gender_Racial_Equality_Score_Mexico_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.2 Gender & Racial Equality Score (Mexico 2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for Gender & Racial Equality in the Fashion Transparency Index Mexico 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606863",
          "weight": 80
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12637631",
          "weight": 20
        }
      ],
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_Mexico_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Gender_Racial_Equality_Score_Mexico_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12637685,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5. Spotlight Issues Score (Mexico 2021)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_Mexico_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5. Spotlight Issues Score (Mexico 2021)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5. Spotlight Issues in the Fashion Transparency Index Mexico 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The Fashion Transparency Index 2021 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">This year for the first time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mental Health Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Emergency Preparedness",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~12637658",
          "weight": 38.55421686746989
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12637666",
          "weight": 6.02409638554217
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606910",
          "weight": 10.843373493975903
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606894",
          "weight": 13.25301204819277
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606925",
          "weight": 10.843373493975903
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606978",
          "weight": 20.481927710843372
        }
      ],
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Mexico_2021.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_Mexico_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12637696,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Fashion Transparency Index Mexico 2021",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Mexico_2021.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Fashion Transparency Index Mexico 2021",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index Mexico 2021? ",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>The Fashion Transparency Index in Mexico is an initiative that analyses how much information is disclosed by the 31 largest fashion and footwear brands in our country (by large we mean those with the highest annual turnover) about their social and environmental commitments, practices and impacts in their own operations and along their supply chain. It aims to contribute to improving the quality of life of workers involved in the industry by increasing accountability and, therefore, stimulating safety, traceability and social and environmental justice.</p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https://issuu.com/fashionrevolution/docs/006ar_fti_reporte_2021_ingle_s_071221\">Read the full report here</a></p>\r\n<p>El Índice de Transparencia de la Moda en México es una iniciativa que analiza cuánta información revelan las 31 marcas de moda y calzado más grandes de nuestro país (por grandes entendemos las de mayor facturación anual) sobre sus compromisos, prácticas e impactos sociales y ambientales en sus propias operaciones y a lo largo de su cadena de suministro. Su objetivo es contribuir a mejorar la calidad de vida de los trabajadores de la industria, aumentando la responsabilidad y, por tanto, estimulando la seguridad, la trazabilidad y la justicia social y medioambiental.</p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https://issuu.com/fashionrevolution/docs/006ar_fti_reporte_2021_espan_ol_071221\">Lea el reporte completo aqui</a></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mental Health Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Emergency Preparedness",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606840",
          "weight": 13.2
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606779",
          "weight": 5.2
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606808",
          "weight": 29.6
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606948",
          "weight": 18.8
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12637685",
          "weight": 33.2
        }
      ],
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_Mexico_2021+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12639510,
      "name": "Walk Free+Company size",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Company_size.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Company size",
      "question": "What is the companies relative size, based on the turnover or revenue range recorded in the UK or Australian Modern Slavery registries respectively?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Small",
        "Medium",
        "Large"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (turnover === \"Under £36 million\" || turnover === \"£36 million to £60 million\" || turnover === \"£60 million to £100 million\" || revenue === \"AU$ 0-99M\" || revenue === \"AU$ 100-150M\" || revenue === \"AU$ 150-200M\" || revenue === \"AU$ 200-250M\") {\n    \"Small\";\n  } else if (turnover === \"£100 million to £500 million\" || revenue === \"AU$ 250-300M\" || revenue === \"AU$ 300-350M\" || revenue === \"AU$ 350-400M\" || revenue === \"AU$ 400-450M\" || revenue === \"AU$ 450-500M\" || revenue === \"AU$ 500-600M\" || revenue === \"AU$ 600-700M\" || revenue === \"AU$ 700-800M\") {\n    \"Medium\";\n  } else if (turnover === \"Over £500 million\" || revenue === \"AU$ 800-900M\" || revenue === \"AU$ 900M-1BN\" || revenue === \"AU$ 1BN+\") {\n    \"Large\";\n  } else {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~8218724",
          "name": "turnover"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~8228714",
          "name": "revenue"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 23012,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 9289,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Company_size+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12642257,
      "name": "Walk Free+Meets Minimum MSA Requirements",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_MSA_Requirements.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Meets Minimum MSA Requirements",
      "question": "Does the company meet the minimum legal requirements either of the UK Modern Slavery Act or of the Australian Modern Slavery Act?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Partially assessed statement",
        "Unknown"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (meets_min_uk_requirements === \"Yes\" || meets_min_aus_requirements === \"Yes\") {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (meets_min_uk_requirements === \"No\" || meets_min_aus_requirements === \"No\") {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (meets_min_uk_requirements !== \"Unknown\" || meets_min_aus_requirements !== \"Unknown\") {\n    \"Partially assessed statement\";\n  } else {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Not Researched",
          "metric": "~6901749",
          "name": "meets_min_uk_requirements"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Not Researched",
          "metric": "~12601871",
          "name": "meets_min_aus_requirements"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3772,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 2215,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Meets_Minimum_MSA_Requirements+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12644728,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Responsible Tax Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Responsible_Tax_Strategy.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Responsible Tax Strategy",
      "question": "Does the company publish a responsible tax strategy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "A responsible tax strategy seeks to ensure that a company is paying a fair share of tax on their profits. Shining a spotlight on corporate tax practices can change the way tax is perceived and treated by businesses.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes a responsible tax strategy.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Tax / Responsible tax<br>\n- Tax strategy<br>\n- Tax practice",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Responsible Tax Strategy+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Responsible_Tax_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Responsible_Tax_Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12644739,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Executive Pay Linked to Environmental and Social Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Executive_Pay_Linked_to_Environmental_and_Social_Targets.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Executive Pay Linked to Environmental and Social Targets",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the percentage of executive pay and bonuses that are linked to environmental and social targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Incentivising staff beyond the CSR/Sustainability team such as sourcing, production, buying and design to contribute towards improving social and environmental impacts ensures there is accountability for those within the company whose decision making has an influence.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes the percentage of executive pay and bonuses that are linked to environmental and social targets. <br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Incentives<br>\n- Performance reviews<br>\n- Bonuses<br>\n- Executive pay<br>\n<br>\nThings to watch out for: <br>\n- We are looking for disclosure of how these incentives are implemented, it is not enough to say that they are in place<br>\n- With 'executive' we mean e.g. CEO, CFO, president",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Executive Pay Linked to Environmental and Social Targets+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Executive_Pay_Linked_to_Environmental_and_Social_Targets+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Executive_Pay_Linked_to_Environmental_and_Social_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12644750,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Describes Human Rights Due Diligence Process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence_Process.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Describes Human Rights Due Diligence Process",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how it works to identify human rights risks, impacts and violations in its supply chain (its approach to conducting due diligence)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Human rights due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights impacts.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses human rights due diligence processes.<br>\n<br>\nDue diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse impacts. Due diligence can be included within broader enterprise risk management systems, provided that it goes beyond simply identifying and managing material risks to the enterprise itself to include issues occurring within their supply chain and focuses on identifying the most salient risks to workers, farmers and other affected stakeholders themselves.<br>\n<br>\nStart by taking a look at a brand's Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure, due diligence processes and results are often there but can also be described in annual reports. <br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Due Diligence<br>\n- Risk <br>\n- Risk Assessment<br>\n- Analysis<br>\n- UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\n- OECD<br>\n- Priorities<br>\n- Identifying salient Human Rights issues",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Describes Human Rights Due Diligence Process+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence_Process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12644761,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Stakeholder Engagement in Human Rights Due Diligence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Stakeholder Engagement in Human Rights Due Diligence",
      "question": "Does the company disclose that worker/producer/farmer representatives, unions and other affected stakeholders are involved in the due diligence process and explain how they are involved?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Human rights due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights impacts.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses whether worker/producer/farmer representatives, unions and other affected stakeholders are involved in the due diligence process.<br>\n<br>\nDue diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse impacts. Due diligence can be included within broader enterprise risk management systems, provided that it goes beyond simply identifying and managing material risks to the enterprise itself to include issues occurring within their supply chain and focuses on identifying the most salient risks to workers, farmers and other affected stakeholders themselves.<br>\n<br>\nStart by taking a look at a brand's Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure, due diligence processes and results are often there but can also be described in annual reports. <br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Due Diligence<br>\n- Risk <br>\n- Risk Assessment<br>\n- Analysis<br>\n- UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\n- OECD<br>\n- Priorities<br>\n- Identifying salient Human Rights issues",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Stakeholder Engagement in Human Rights Due Diligence+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12644772,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Human Rights Risks Impacts and Violations Identified",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Human_Rights_Risks_Impacts_and_Violations_Identified.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Human Rights Risks Impacts and Violations Identified",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the human rights risks, impacts and violations identified and their prioritisation (low, medium, high)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Human rights due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights impacts.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses the risks/impacts identified and their prioritisation (low, medium, high).<br>\n<br>\nDue diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse impacts. Due diligence can be included within broader enterprise risk management systems, provided that it goes beyond simply identifying and managing material risks to the enterprise itself to include issues occurring within their supply chain and focuses on identifying the most salient risks to workers, farmers and other affected stakeholders themselves.<br>\n<br>\nStart by taking a look at a brand's Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure, due diligence processes and results are often there but can also be described in annual reports. <br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Due Diligence<br>\n- Risk <br>\n- Risk Assessment<br>\n- Analysis<br>\n- UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\n- OECD<br>\n- Priorities<br>\n- Identifying salient Human Rights or Environmental issues<br>\n<br>\nThings to watch out for:<br>\n- A materiality matrix may be partially based on a company's due diligence process but they do not get points in this section purely for publishing a materiality matrix. <br>\n- We are looking for geographic hotspots and thematic risks and impacts to be identified.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Human Rights Risks Impacts and Violations Identified+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Human_Rights_Risks_Impacts_and_Violations_Identified+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Human_Rights_Risks_Impacts_and_Violations_Identified+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12644783,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Prevention Mitigation and Remediation of Human Rights Risks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Prevention_Mitigation_and_Remediation_of_Human_Rights_Risks.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Prevention Mitigation and Remediation of Human Rights Risks",
      "question": "Does the company disclose evidence of steps taken to cease, prevent, mitigate and remedy human rights risks, impacts and violations identified?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Human rights due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights impacts.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses steps taken to cease, prevent, mitigate and remedy violations identified.<br>\n<br>\nDue diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse impacts. Due diligence can be included within broader enterprise risk management systems, provided that it goes beyond simply identifying and managing material risks to the enterprise itself to include issues occurring within the supply chain and focuses on identifying the most salient risks to workers, farmers and other affected stakeholders.<br>\n<br>\nStart by taking a look at a brand's Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure, due diligence processes and results are often there but can also be described in annual reports. <br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Due Diligence<br>\n- Risk <br>\n- Risk Assessment<br>\n- Analysis<br>\n- UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\n- OECD<br>\n- Priorities<br>\n- Identifying salient Human Rights issues",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Prevention Mitigation and Remediation of Human Rights Risks+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Prevention_Mitigation_and_Remediation_of_Human_Rights_Risks+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Prevention_Mitigation_and_Remediation_of_Human_Rights_Risks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12644794,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Human Rights Risk Prevention and Remediation Outcomes Published",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Human_Rights_Risk_Prevention_and_Remediation_Outcomes_Published.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Human Rights Risk Prevention and Remediation Outcomes Published",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the outcomes or results of steps taken to cease, prevent, mitigate and remedy human rights risks, impacts and violations identified?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Human rights due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights impacts.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses the outcomes of steps taken to remedy risks.<br>\n<br>\nDue diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse impacts. Due diligence can be included within broader enterprise risk management systems, provided that it goes beyond simply identifying and managing material risks to the enterprise itself to include issues occurring within their supply chain and focuses on identifying the most salient risks to workers, farmers and other affected stakeholders themselves.<br>\n<br>\nStart by taking a look at a brand's Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure, due diligence processes and results are often there but can also be described in annual reports. <br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Due Diligence<br>\n- Risk <br>\n- Risk Assessment<br>\n- Analysis<br>\n- UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\n- OECD<br>\n- Priorities<br>\n- Identifying salient Human Rights issues",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Human Rights Risk Prevention and Remediation Outcomes Published+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Human_Rights_Risk_Prevention_and_Remediation_Outcomes_Published+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Human_Rights_Risk_Prevention_and_Remediation_Outcomes_Published+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12644805,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Describes Environmental Due Diligence Process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Environmental_Due_Diligence_Process.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Describes Environmental Due Diligence Process",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how it works to identify environmental risks, impacts and violations in its supply chain (its approach to conducting due diligence)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Environmental due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses environmental due diligence processes.<br>\n<br>\nDue diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse impacts. Due diligence can be included within broader enterprise risk management systems, provided that it goes beyond simply identifying and managing material risks to the enterprise itself to include issues occurring within their supply chain and focuses on identifying the most salient risks to workers, farmers and other affected stakeholders themselves.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Due Diligence<br>\n- Risk <br>\n- Risk Assessment<br>\n- Analysis<br>\n- OECD<br>\n- Priorities<br>\n- Identifying salient environmental issues",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Describes Environmental Due Diligence Process+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Environmental_Due_Diligence_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Environmental_Due_Diligence_Process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12644816,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Stakeholder Engagement in Environmental Due Diligence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Environmental_Due_Diligence.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Stakeholder Engagement in Environmental Due Diligence",
      "question": "Does the company disclose that worker/producer/farmer representatives, unions and other affected stakeholders are involved in the due diligence process and explain how they are involved?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Environmental due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses whether worker/producer/farmer representatives, unions and other affected stakeholders are involved in the due diligence process.<br>\n<br>\nDue diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse impacts. Due diligence can be included within broader enterprise risk management systems, provided that it goes beyond simply identifying and managing material risks to the enterprise itself to include issues occurring within their supply chain and focuses on identifying the most salient risks to workers, farmers and other affected stakeholders themselves.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Due Diligence<br>\n- Risk <br>\n- Risk Assessment<br>\n- Analysis<br>\n- OECD<br>\n- Priorities<br>\n- Identifying salient environmental issues",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Stakeholder Engagement in Environmental Due Diligence+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Environmental_Due_Diligence+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Environmental_Due_Diligence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12644827,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Environmental Risks Impacts and Violations Identified",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Environmental_Risks_Impacts_and_Violations_Identified.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Environmental Risks Impacts and Violations Identified",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the environmental risks, impacts and violations identified and their prioritisation (low, medium, high)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Environmental due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses the risks/impacts identified and their prioritisation (low, medium, high).<br>\n<br>\nDue diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse impacts. Due diligence can be included within broader enterprise risk management systems, provided that it goes beyond simply identifying and managing material risks to the enterprise itself to include issues occurring within their supply chain and focuses on identifying the most salient risks to workers, farmers and other affected stakeholders themselves.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Due Diligence<br>\n- Risk <br>\n- Risk Assessment<br>\n- Analysis<br>\n- OECD<br>\n- Priorities<br>\n- Identifying salient environmental issues<br>\n<br>\nThings to watch out for:<br>\n- A materiality matrix may be partially based on a company's due diligence process but they do not get points in this section purely for publishing a materiality matrix. <br>\n- We are looking for geographic hotspots and thematic risks and impacts to be identified.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Environmental Risks Impacts and Violations Identified+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Environmental_Risks_Impacts_and_Violations_Identified+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Environmental_Risks_Impacts_and_Violations_Identified+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12644838,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Prevention Mitigation and Remediation of Environmental Risks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Prevention_Mitigation_and_Remediation_of_Environmental_Risks.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Prevention Mitigation and Remediation of Environmental Risks",
      "question": "Does the company disclose evidence of steps taken to cease, prevent, mitigate and remedy environmental risks, impacts and violations identified?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Environmental due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses steps taken to cease, prevent, mitigate and remedy violations identified.<br>\n<br>\nDue diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse impacts. Due diligence can be included within broader enterprise risk management systems, provided that it goes beyond simply identifying and managing material risks to the enterprise itself to include issues occurring within the supply chain and focuses on identifying the most salient risks to workers, farmers and other affected stakeholders.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Due Diligence<br>\n- Risk <br>\n- Risk Assessment<br>\n- Analysis<br>\n- OECD<br>\n- Priorities<br>\n- Identifying salient environmental issues",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Prevention Mitigation and Remediation of Environmental Risks+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Prevention_Mitigation_and_Remediation_of_Environmental_Risks+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Prevention_Mitigation_and_Remediation_of_Environmental_Risks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12644849,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Environmental Risk Prevention and Remediation Outcomes Published",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Environmental_Risk_Prevention_and_Remediation_Outcomes_Published.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Environmental Risk Prevention and Remediation Outcomes Published",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the outcomes or results of steps taken to cease, prevent, mitigate and remedy environmental risks, impacts and violations identified?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Environmental due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses the outcomes of steps taken to remedy risks.<br>\n<br>\nDue diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse impacts. Due diligence can be included within broader enterprise risk management systems, provided that it goes beyond simply identifying and managing material risks to the enterprise itself to include issues occurring within their supply chain and focuses on identifying the most salient risks to workers, farmers and other affected stakeholders themselves.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Due Diligence<br>\n- Risk <br>\n- Risk Assessment<br>\n- Analysis<br>\n- OECD<br>\n- Priorities<br>\n- Identifying salient environmental issues",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Environmental Risk Prevention and Remediation Outcomes Published+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Environmental_Risk_Prevention_and_Remediation_Outcomes_Published+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Environmental_Risk_Prevention_and_Remediation_Outcomes_Published+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12644860,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Scope, Process and Accreditation for Environmental Audits",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Scope_Process_and_Accreditation_for_Environmental_Audits.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Scope, Process and Accreditation for Environmental Audits",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the scope, process and accreditation for their environmental audits?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Environmental audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the scope, process and accreditation for environmental audits. <br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Audit<br>\n- Factory visit/Assessment<br>\n- Supplier Compliance<br>\n- Social Compliance<br>\n- Assessment<br>\n- Monitoring<br>\n- Measurement or Performance Standards",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Scope, Process and Accreditation for Environmental Audits+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Scope_Process_and_Accreditation_for_Environmental_Audits+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Scope_Process_and_Accreditation_for_Environmental_Audits+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12644871,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Findings of Corrective Action Plans by Named Facility",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Findings_of_Corrective_Action_Plans_by_Named_Facility.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Findings of Corrective Action Plans by Named Facility",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the individual findings and root cause analysis of the Corrective Action Plans (such as non-compliances, observations and good examples) by named facility?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "When companies disclose remediation plans and status by named facilities it shows a clear commitment to transparency from brands and can drive improvements in supplier compliance. It also provides stakeholders with useful information that can enable labour and environmental issues to be resolved quickly and collaboratively.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses  the individual findings and root cause analysis of the Corrective Action Plans (such as non-compliances, observations and good examples) by named facility<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands <br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Noncompliance<br>\n- Remediation<br>\n- Corrective action plans (CAPs)<br>\n- Status<br>\n- supplier list<br>\n- supplier name",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Findings of Corrective Action Plans by Named Facility+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Findings_of_Corrective_Action_Plans_by_Named_Facility+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Findings_of_Corrective_Action_Plans_by_Named_Facility+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12644882,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Number of Workers Affected by Recruitment Fees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Number_of_Workers_Affected_by_Recruitment_Fees.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Number of Workers Affected by Recruitment Fees",
      "question": "Does the company discloses the number of workers in the supply chain affected by the payment of recruitment fees or related costs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "A major cause of forced labour in today’s global supply chains is the charging of recruitment fees to migrant workers. Such payments can create situations of debt bondage and leave low-wage workers vulnerable to human trafficking and further exploitation. When a company discloses information about its approach to recruitment fees being paid by workers in the supply chain it demonstrates that the company is taking steps to address and mitigate the prevalence of modern slavery.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the number of workers in the supply chain affected by the payment of recruitment fees or related costs.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Recruitment<br>\n- Modern Slavery<br>\n- Forced Labour<br>\n- Bonded Labour<br>\n- Migrant workers<br>\n- Recruitment Fees<br>\n- Debt bondage<br>\n- Employer Pays Principle",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Number of Workers Affected by Recruitment Fees+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Number_of_Workers_Affected_by_Recruitment_Fees+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Number_of_Workers_Affected_by_Recruitment_Fees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12644893,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Responsible Purchasing Code of Conduct",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Responsible_Purchasing_Code_of_Conduct.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Responsible Purchasing Code of Conduct",
      "question": "Does the company publish a Responsible Purchasing Code of Conduct (aka Buyer Code)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes a Responsible Purchasing Code of Conduct (aka Buyer Code).<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- In Modern Slavery Statement or <br>\n- California Transparency Act disclosure<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Purchasing Practices<br>\n- Responsible Purchasing Code<br>\n- Buyer Code",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Responsible Purchasing Code of Conduct+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Responsible_Purchasing_Code_of_Conduct+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Responsible_Purchasing_Code_of_Conduct+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12644904,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Gender Equality Actions in Supplier Facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Gender_Equality_Actions_in_Supplier_Facilities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Gender Equality Actions in Supplier Facilities",
      "question": "Does the company disclose actions focusing on the promotion of gender equality in supplier facilities (such as steps taken to address instances of gender-based violence or initiatives to promote women workers into leadership positions)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric covers actions and programs that foster a culture in favour of gender equality, inclusion of women in managerial and executive positions, and the promotion of gender equality in integration events of new workers.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses actions focusing on the promotion of gender equality in supplier facilities (such as steps taken to address instances of gender-based violence or initiatives to promote women workers into leadership positions).<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Gender equality<br>\n- Supply chain<br>\n- Women",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production"
      ],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Gender Equality Actions in Supplier Facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Gender_Equality_Actions_in_Supplier_Facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Gender_Equality_Actions_in_Supplier_Facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12644926,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Content of Scope 1, 2 and 3 Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Content_of_Scope_1_2_and_3_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Content of Scope 1, 2 and 3 Emissions",
      "question": "Does the company explain what is included in the company's scopes 1, 2 and 3 emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "When calculating their carbon footprint, brands do not always disclose what is in and out of scope.<br>\nBest practice would include listing the different categories accounted for in Scope 3, in alignment with the GHG Protocol.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company explains what is included in the company's scopes 1, 2 and 3 emissions. <br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Carbon<br>\n- Climate<br>\n- GHG<br>\n- Emissions<br>\n- Scope 3",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Content of Scope 1, 2 and 3 Emissions+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 254,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Content_of_Scope_1_2_and_3_Emissions+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Content_of_Scope_1_2_and_3_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12649250,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Corrective Action Plans and Status by Named Facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Corrective_Action_Plans_and_Status_by_Named_Facilities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Corrective Action Plans and Status by Named Facilities",
      "question": "Does the company disclose Corrective Action Plans and status by named-facility (open, on-track, behind schedule, complete)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>When companies disclose remediation plans and status by named facilities it shows a clear commitment to transparency from brands and can drive improvements in supplier compliance. It also provides stakeholders with useful information that can enable labour and environmental issues to be resolved quickly and collaboratively.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly discloses Corrective Action Plans and status by named-facility (open, on-track, behind schedule, complete).</p>\r\n<p><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong></p>\r\n<p>- Corporate Social Responsibility report</p>\r\n<p>- In Modern Slavery Statement or California Transparency Act disclosure</p>\r\n<p>- Company documents</p>\r\n<p>- Company policies</p>\r\n<p>- Company websites</p>\r\n<p>- Company code of conduct</p>\r\n<p>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands </p>\r\n<p><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong></p>\r\n<p>- Remediation</p>\r\n<p>- Corrective action plans (CAPs)</p>\r\n<p>- Status</p>\r\n<p>- supplier list</p>\r\n<p>- supplier name</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Corrective Action Plans and Status by Named Facilities+Fashion Transparency Index 2022 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Corrective_Action_Plans_and_Status_by_Named_Facilities+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2022_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Corrective_Action_Plans_and_Status_by_Named_Facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12649967,
      "name": "Commons+Biodiversity Definition",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Biodiversity_Definition.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Biodiversity Definition",
      "question": "Does the company define Biodiversity?  \r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>\"Biodiversity includes the wide variety of flora and fauna which populates the world and permits the development of human life. Its loss is ranked in the top 5 existential threats that humanity will face withinthe next 10 years according to the World Economic Forum’s 2021 Global Risks Report.\"</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\">Source: [[https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5df776f6866c14507f2df68a/t/61960a8e66fd8250876e5840/1637223057417/Biodiversity_Industry_2021_Blueprint.pdf|Integrating Biodiveristy in Business]]</span></p>\r\n<p>\"Biodiversity is a fundamental component of long-term business survival. Businesses rely on genes, species, and ecosystem services as critical inputs into their production processes and depend on healthy ecosystems to treat and dissipate waste, maintain soil and water quality and help control the air composition. For example, agribusiness relies on the diversity of wild relatives of major food crops, as a resource to ensure crop resistance to disease and pests.<span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\"><br style=\"font-family: verdana,helvetica,sans-serif;\"></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\">Source: [[https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/sustainability-at-ifc/publications/biodiversityguide_understanding_business|IFC-World Bank]]</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company includes a definition of biodiversity on their public reports.</p>\r\n<p>The information is most likely to be found on a company's sustainability report, annual report, or integrated report.</p>\r\n<p>If you can find the company defines Biodiveristy, set their value to “<strong>Yes</strong>”. In this case, please <strong>add the definition to the comments</strong> and indicate the page number where you found it.</p>\r\n<p>If the company does not include a definition of biodiversity, you should set their value on this metric to “<strong>No</strong>”.</p>\r\n<p>Keywords and Search Terms<br>- Biodiversity</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 30,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Biodiversity_Definition+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12650147,
      "name": "Commons+Zero Deforestation Progress",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Zero_Deforestation_Progress.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Zero Deforestation Progress",
      "question": "Does the company publish measurable progress towards achieving zero deforestation?\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Limiting deforestation is a crucial part of mitigating global carbon emissions. A zero-deforestation commitment shows that the company is working to minimise its use of fibres derived from ancient and endangered forests and forested areas that have been cleared or converted.</p>\r\n<p>This metric is the researchable version of a metric originally used by Fashion Revolution and the FTI to assess deforestation commitments in the fashion industry.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes measurable progress towards achieving zero deforestation. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Deforestation<br>- Forest<br>- Viscose<br>- Man-made cellulosic fibres<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Will not allow net zero deforestation which allows for the clearance or conversion of forests in one area as long as an equal area is replanted elsewhere. Looking for best practice on this issue which is zero deforestation.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Zero_Deforestation_Progress+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12650164,
      "name": "Commons+Zero Deforestation Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Zero_Deforestation_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Zero Deforestation Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company publish a time-bound, measurable commitment to zero deforestation?\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Limiting deforestation is a crucial part of mitigating global carbon emissions. A zero-deforestation commitment shows that the company is working to minimise its use of fibres derived from ancient and endangered forests and forested areas that have been cleared or converted.</p>\r\n<p>*This metric is the researchable version of a metric originally used by Fashion Revolution and the FTI to assess deforestation commitments in the fashion industry.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes a time-bound, measurable commitment to zero deforestation. <br><br><strong>Where to look for this information:</strong><br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br><strong>Good keywords for your searches include:</strong><br>- Deforestation<br>- Forest<br>- Viscose<br>- Man-made cellulosic fibres<br><br><strong>Things to keep in mind:</strong><br>- Will not allow net zero deforestation which allows for the clearance or conversion of forests in one area as long as an equal area is replanted elsewhere. Looking for best practice on this issue which is zero deforestation.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 15,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Zero_Deforestation_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12773481,
      "name": "Commons+Gender Equality Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Gender_Equality_Policy.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Gender Equality Policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available Gender Equality Policy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Gender, social inclusion, and diversity policies are important organizational building blocks that create an enabling environment for equality, enable organizations to set and track progress towards goals, and support organizations to develop a business case for gender equality. When effective, gender equality, diversity, and inclusion policies set the tone of an organization, demonstrate leadership commitment, and enable organizations to achieve gender equality. [[https://www.usaid.gov/engendering-industries/gender-equality-guides/policies|Source.]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric captures whether companies have a Gender Equality Policy, and if so, if it is easily accessible. Companies may use another name for this policy – such as “Gender Equality Strategy” or \"Empowerment of Women Policy\".</p>\r\n<p>The policy will typically be available in on a company's website. The policy may sometimes form part of a more general company policy.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>If you can find a Gender Equality Policy for a company, set their value to “<strong>Yes</strong>” and add the source. </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Where applicable, you should also say whether the company has a stand-alone policy on Gender Equality Policy, or whether it forms part of a more general company policy (for example, on human rights). If the company's policy is not a stand-alone document but included within another document, you should set their value to \"<strong>Partial</strong>\".</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>If you can't find a Gender Equality Policy for a company, you should set their value on this metric to “<strong>No</strong>” and include some details of how/where you searched as a “Report” source.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Partial"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion Policies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 5,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Gender_Equality_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 12983804,
      "name": "André Meinhard+Biodiversity Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/André_Meinhard+Biodiversity_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "André Meinhard",
      "title": "Biodiversity Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report on its strategy to minimize its impact on biodiversity's and the environment (including measurable targets)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>This metric asks whether the company reports on its biodiversity impact strategy and targets. This information may be found within an annual report, an integrated report, or a sustainability report.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Select \"<strong>The company has a policy\"</strong> if you can find a Biodiversity related policy</li>\r\n<li>Select \"<strong>The company reports KPIs (Key Performance Indicators)</strong>\" if you find a list of indicators that the company has set to measure progress toward the company's environment-related targets or objectives.</li>\r\n<li>Select \"None\" if you cannot find a Biodiversity-related policy nor a list of indicators to measure progress toward the company's environment-related targets or objectives.</li>\r\n<li><strong>*Select as many options as may apply:</strong></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>Keywords and Search Terms.</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Biodiversity</li>\r\n<li>Ecosystem</li>\r\n<li>Habitat</li>\r\n<li>Key Performance Indicators (KPI)</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>If KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) are found, please list them along  in the Comments field.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "The company has a policy",
        "The company reports KPIs (Key Performance Indicators)",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/André_Meinhard+Biodiversity_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13006134,
      "name": "Walk Free+Supply chain wages disclosure (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Supply_chain_wages_disclosure_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Supply chain wages disclosure (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose any information about the wages workers receive in their supply chain? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span>Low and underpayment of wages are an indicator of forced labour. Due to chronic poverty of farmers, agriculture characterised by small-scale farming, fluctuations and extremely low prices of cocoa, low wages can be common in the cocoa sector.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To meet this metric, companies must disclose that it has made commitments, or has taken action, to tackle low or underpayment of wages in their supply chains.</p>\r\n<p><span>This can include:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span>Commitment to increasing farmer income through premiums</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Acknowledge and support the Living Income Differential fee</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Commitment to paying living wage or fair wages</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Action plan to pay living wage</span></li>\r\n<li><span>Number of suppliers where living wage is paid</span></li>\r\n<li><span>% of suppliers that have committed to pay living wage</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span><strong>Note</strong>: </span><span>these must be general commitments outside of commitments made in direct response to the COVID-19 pandemic.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 60,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 38,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Supply_chain_wages_disclosure_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13006147,
      "name": "Walk Free+Addressing and monitoring child labour (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Addressing_and_monitoring_child_labour_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Addressing and monitoring child labour (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the company have a Child Labour Monitoring and Remediation System (CLMRS) in place that covers 100% of their cocoa sources, is assessed by a third party and references ongoing commitments to improve/expand?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Child Labour Monitoring and Remediation Systems (CLMRS) represent a means of targeting prevention, mitigation and remediation assistance to children involved in or at risk of child labour, as well as to their families and communities. It uses the structure of the supply chain and community groups to identify where children are working and remedy those cases. Companies with a robust CLMRS in place allows them to identify instances in their supply chain of illegal child labour (in that country), find alternative solutions and prevent the use of illegal child labour by raising awareness around the topic. CLMRS is endorsed by Tony’s Chocoloney, a case study of a promising practice in the industry.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To meet this metric, companies must be actively implementing a CLMRS, that is assessed independently by a third party and be referencing ongoing commitments and improvements.  </p>\r\n<p>Examples of the types of action companies may disclose, include: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>References a CLMRS system in place, and gives a detailed description about their company specific CLMRS, in coordination with associated bodies (E.g. ICI), tracks progress, discusses areas of weakness and how they are going to revise and improve protocols</li>\r\n<li>CLMRS should use a combination of household visits and farm visits to increase the likelihood that all cases of child labour are identified in supply chain and can be addressed</li>\r\n<li>CLMRS includes training and awareness-raising for farming households and community members, as well as monitoring and remediation of child labor</li>\r\n<li>The company uses an independent/ external third-party to assess CLMRS effectiveness</li>\r\n<li>The remediation process includes at least two consecutive visits after child is found in a situation of hazardous/ forced labour</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "In Development",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 60,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 38,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Addressing_and_monitoring_child_labour_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13006342,
      "name": "Gershon M. Bialer+CO2e Intensity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Gershon_M_Bialer+CO2e_Intensity.json",
      "designer": "Gershon M. Bialer",
      "title": "CO2e Intensity",
      "question": "What is the emission intensity?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "CO2e/$",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  (m1 + m2 + m3) / r;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~826615",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~826629",
          "name": "m2"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~849642",
          "name": "m3"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~3341320",
          "name": "r"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 953,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 602,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Gershon_M_Bialer+CO2e_Intensity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13006690,
      "name": "Lucia Ixtacuy+Wastewater discharged",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Wastewater_discharged.json",
      "designer": "Lucia Ixtacuy",
      "title": "Wastewater discharged",
      "question": "What is the total amount of wastewater discharged  created by the company (in cubic metrics)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<div>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">To answer this question you need to identify the <strong>total wastewater discharged </strong><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><strong>by the organization</strong> </span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">for a specific year</span><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. If the answer is not reported or found in appropriate documents, select the <em>Unknown</em> answer box.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords</span> &amp; search terms: wastewater, discharged</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span>: Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">calculations or conversions </span>are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">page number</span> where you found the answer.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Units: </span>Companies may report the <em>volume</em> in thousands of cubic metres, or using a unit other than cubic meters. If this is the case, convert units to cubic meters (see website below), or add the number of zeros indicated, and fill in the total number in the answer field - e.g. If the company says '0.5 million cubic metrics' the answer should be entered on Wikirate as '500000'. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">For conversions, </span><a href=\"http://Convertunits.com\" target=\"_blank\">Convertunits.com</a><span style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"> can be helpful.</span></p>\r\n</div>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "cubic meters",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 26,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 26,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Wastewater_discharged+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13006706,
      "name": "Lucia Ixtacuy+Wastewater management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Wastewater_management.json",
      "designer": "Lucia Ixtacuy",
      "title": "Wastewater management",
      "question": "Does the company publish how it manages its wastewater?\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<h5> </h5>",
      "methodology": "<p>Select <strong>Yes</strong> if the company publishes information on how it manages wastewater. Add it to the comments section. <br>Select <strong>No</strong> if you cannot find information on how the company manages wastewater.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 21,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Wastewater_management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13010310,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Fashion Transparency Index 2022",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2022.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Fashion Transparency Index 2022",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index 2022?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<div style=\"font-size: 16px;\">\r\n<div>\r\n<p>While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p>The Fashion Transparency Index 2022 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p>This year for the third time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>\r\n<p>The Fashion Transparency Index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). It is not a Free Culture Licence. Please see the link for more information: <a href=\"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/\" target=\"_blank\">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</a></p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>\r\n<div style=\"font-size: 16px;\">\r\n<div> </div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606840",
          "weight": 13.2
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174525",
          "weight": 4.4
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174558",
          "weight": 29.2
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174788",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174862",
          "weight": 33.2
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2022+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13010531,
      "name": "Lucia Ixtacuy+Approach to Child Sexual Abuse Material",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Approach_to_Child_Sexual_Abuse_Material.json",
      "designer": "Lucia Ixtacuy",
      "title": "Approach to Child Sexual Abuse Material",
      "question": "Does the company address the issue of child sexual abuse material?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Approach_to_Child_Sexual_Abuse_Material+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13010549,
      "name": "Lucia Ixtacuy+Technology to detect child sexual abuse or grooming",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Technology_to_detect_child_sexual_abuse_or_grooming.json",
      "designer": "Lucia Ixtacuy",
      "title": "Technology to detect child sexual abuse or grooming",
      "question": "Does the company discloses if it has technology in place to detect child abuse or child grooming?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Technology_to_detect_child_sexual_abuse_or_grooming+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13025357,
      "name": "Lucia Ixtacuy+COVID Public Finance Support",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+COVID_Public_Finance_Support.json",
      "designer": "Lucia Ixtacuy",
      "title": "COVID Public Finance Support",
      "question": "How much was the company granted in public finance support (state aid) because of the COVID-19 pandemic ?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Euro",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+COVID_Public_Finance_Support+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13173037,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Responsible Tax Strategy+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Responsible_Tax_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Responsible Tax Strategy",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Governance_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Responsible_Tax_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13173053,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Executive Pay Linked to Environmental and Social Targets+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Executive_Pay_Linked_to_Environmental_and_Social_Targets+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Executive Pay Linked to Environmental and Social Targets",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Incentivising staff beyond the CSR/Sustainability team such as sourcing, production, buying and design to contribute towards improving social and environmental impacts ensures there is accountability for those within the company whose decision making has an influence.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_4_Incorporation_of_Human_Rights_Environmental_Performance_in_Purchasing_Practices.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Executive_Pay_Linked_to_Environmental_and_Social_Targets+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13173059,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Describes Human Rights Due Diligence Process+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Describes Human Rights Due Diligence Process",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Human rights due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights impacts.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1A_Know_Show_Fix_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13173065,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Stakeholder Engagement in Human Rights Due Diligence+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Stakeholder Engagement in Human Rights Due Diligence",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Human rights due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights impacts.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1A_Know_Show_Fix_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13173071,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Human Rights Risks Impacts and Violations Identified+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Human_Rights_Risks_Impacts_and_Violations_Identified+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Human Rights Risks Impacts and Violations Identified",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Human rights due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights impacts.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1A_Know_Show_Fix_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Human_Rights_Risks_Impacts_and_Violations_Identified+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13173077,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Prevention Mitigation and Remediation of Human Rights Risks+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Prevention_Mitigation_and_Remediation_of_Human_Rights_Risks+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Prevention Mitigation and Remediation of Human Rights Risks",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Human rights due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights impacts.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1A_Know_Show_Fix_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Prevention_Mitigation_and_Remediation_of_Human_Rights_Risks+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13173083,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Human Rights Risk Prevention and Remediation Outcomes Published+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Human_Rights_Risk_Prevention_and_Remediation_Outcomes_Published+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Human Rights Risk Prevention and Remediation Outcomes Published",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Human rights due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights impacts.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1A_Know_Show_Fix_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Human_Rights_Risk_Prevention_and_Remediation_Outcomes_Published+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13173089,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Describes Environmental Due Diligence Process+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Environmental_Due_Diligence_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Describes Environmental Due Diligence Process",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Environmental due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1B_Know_Show_Fix_Environmental_Due_Diligence.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Describes_Environmental_Due_Diligence_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13173095,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Stakeholder Engagement in Environmental Due Diligence+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Environmental_Due_Diligence+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Stakeholder Engagement in Environmental Due Diligence",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Environmental due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1B_Know_Show_Fix_Environmental_Due_Diligence.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Stakeholder_Engagement_in_Environmental_Due_Diligence+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13173101,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Environmental Risks Impacts and Violations Identified+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Environmental_Risks_Impacts_and_Violations_Identified+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Environmental Risks Impacts and Violations Identified",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Environmental due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1B_Know_Show_Fix_Environmental_Due_Diligence.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Environmental_Risks_Impacts_and_Violations_Identified+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13173107,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Prevention Mitigation and Remediation of Environmental Risks+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Prevention_Mitigation_and_Remediation_of_Environmental_Risks+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Prevention Mitigation and Remediation of Environmental Risks",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Environmental due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1B_Know_Show_Fix_Environmental_Due_Diligence.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Prevention_Mitigation_and_Remediation_of_Environmental_Risks+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13173113,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Environmental Risk Prevention and Remediation Outcomes Published+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Environmental_Risk_Prevention_and_Remediation_Outcomes_Published+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Environmental Risk Prevention and Remediation Outcomes Published",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Environmental due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1B_Know_Show_Fix_Environmental_Due_Diligence.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Environmental_Risk_Prevention_and_Remediation_Outcomes_Published+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13173119,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Scope, Process and Accreditation for Environmental Audits+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Scope_Process_and_Accreditation_for_Environmental_Audits+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Scope, Process and Accreditation for Environmental Audits",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Environmental audits represent a snapshot in time at a particular supplier facility and can help companies understand if suppliers are complying with their environmental standards. Audits can be used to monitor ongoing compliance with a company's standards where risks are deemed high and issues have been raised.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Scope_Process_and_Accreditation_for_Environmental_Audits+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13173125,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Findings of Corrective Action Plans by Named Facility+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Findings_of_Corrective_Action_Plans_by_Named_Facility+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Findings of Corrective Action Plans by Named Facility",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "When companies disclose remediation plans and status by named facilities it shows a clear commitment to transparency from brands and can drive improvements in supplier compliance. It also provides stakeholders with useful information that can enable labour and environmental issues to be resolved quickly and collaboratively.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4A_Fix_Remediation_Process_2022.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Findings_of_Corrective_Action_Plans_by_Named_Facility+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13173131,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Number of Workers Affected by Recruitment Fees+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Number_of_Workers_Affected_by_Recruitment_Fees+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Number of Workers Affected by Recruitment Fees",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "A major cause of forced labour in today’s global supply chains is the charging of recruitment fees to migrant workers. Such payments can create situations of debt bondage and leave low-wage workers vulnerable to human trafficking and further exploitation. When a company discloses information about its approach to recruitment fees being paid by workers in the supply chain it demonstrates that the company is taking steps to address and mitigate the prevalence of modern slavery.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Tackling_Modern_Slavery_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Number_of_Workers_Affected_by_Recruitment_Fees+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13173137,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publishes Responsible Purchasing Code of Conduct+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Responsible_Purchasing_Code_of_Conduct+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publishes Responsible Purchasing Code of Conduct",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Purchasing practices are the way that a company interacts and does business with the manufacturers that supply their products. It encompasses strategic planning, sourcing, development, purchasing (buying) and the underlying behaviours, values and principles which impact workers.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publishes_Responsible_Purchasing_Code_of_Conduct+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13173143,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Gender Equality Actions in Supplier Facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Gender_Equality_Actions_in_Supplier_Facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Gender Equality Actions in Supplier Facilities",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2021?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "This metric covers actions and programs that foster a culture in favour of gender equality, inclusion of women in managerial and executive positions, and the promotion of gender equality in integration events of new workers.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Gender_Equality_Actions_in_Supplier_Facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13173149,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Content of Scope 1, 2 and 3 Emissions+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Content_of_Scope_1_2_and_3_Emissions+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Content of Scope 1, 2 and 3 Emissions",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 254,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2023.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Greenhouse_Gas_GHG_Footprint.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Content_of_Scope_1_2_and_3_Emissions+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174510,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2.4 Incorporation of Human Rights & Environmental Performance in Purchasing Practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_4_Incorporation_of_Human_Rights_Environmental_Performance_in_Purchasing_Practices.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2.4 Incorporation of Human Rights & Environmental Performance in Purchasing Practices",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 2.4 Incorporation of Human Rights & Environmental Performance in Purchasing Practices in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Incentivising staff beyond the CSR/Sustainability team such as sourcing, production, buying and design to contribute towards improving social and environmental impacts ensures there is accountability for those within the company whose decision making has an influence. While incentivising suppliers to improve social and environmental performance can be accomplished through guaranteeing longer contracts, increased order size, price premiums and fewer audits can motivate suppliers to improve and drive changes in their own operations and throughout their supply chain.</p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system:</p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5962694",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5962441",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13173053",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5962188",
          "weight": 33.33
        }
      ],
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Governance_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_4_Incorporation_of_Human_Rights_Environmental_Performance_in_Purchasing_Practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174525,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2. Governance Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Governance_Score.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2. Governance Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 2. Governance in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7605856",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606771",
          "weight": 27.27
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13173037",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174510",
          "weight": 54.55
        }
      ],
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Governance_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174542,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3.1 Tier One Factory Disclosure+Fashion Transparency Index 2022 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_1_Tier_One_Factory_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2022_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3.1 Tier One Factory Disclosure",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2022?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Name of Facility\":\"1.153846154\",\"Address\":\"1.153846154\",\"Type of products or services\":\"0.7692307692\",\"Approximate number of workers at each site\":\"0.7692307692\",\"Sex-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site\":\"0.3846153846\",\"If facility has trade union\":\"0.7692307692\",\"If the facility has an independent worker committee\":\"0.3846153846\",\"% or number of migrant or contract workers\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Certifications the facility has (if any) (2021 only)\":\"0.7692307692\",\"Name of Parent Company (for each facility if applicable)\":\"1.153846154\",\"List is publicly available as a csv or Excel spreadsheet\":\"0.7692307692\",\"Discloses what percentage of its tier one factories is published\":\"\",\"Discloses 95% or higher of tier one factories are included in the list/map\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Publishes that this list or map of tier one factories has been updated within the past 6 months\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Race-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site (FTI Brazil only)\":\"\",\"Supplier list contributed to the Open Apparel Registry (assessed from 2022)\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Discloses aggregate business volume and percentage of suppliers (assessed from 2022)\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Nothing\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 254,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 254,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2022.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_1_Tier_One_Factory_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2022_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174549,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3.2 Processing Facilities Disclosure+Fashion Transparency Index 2022 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_2_Processing_Facilities_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2022_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3.2 Processing Facilities Disclosure",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index 2022?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Disclosing a list of suppliers beyond the first tier shows that a brand is working to map deeper levels of their supply chain and takes some responsibility for its direct and indirect sourcing relationships. It can help facilitate the identification and escalation of labour rights and environmental issues by trade unions, NGOs and other stakeholders directly to brands enabling them to take urgent actions to address and remediate issues raised. This is especially important beyond the first tier where brands may not be able to monitor their suppliers as easily.<br><br>A note on the scoring system<br><br>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Name of Facility\":\"1.153846154\",\"Address\":\"1.153846154\",\"Type of products or services\":\"0.7692307692\",\"Approximate number of workers at each site\":\"0.7692307692\",\"Sex-disaggregated breakdown of workers\":\"0.3846153846\",\"If facility has trade union\":\"0.7692307692\",\"If the facility has an independent worker committee\":\"0.3846153846\",\"% or number of migrant or contract workers\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Certifications the facility has (if any) (2021 only)\":\"0.7692307692\",\"Name of Parent Company (for each facility if applicable)\":\"1.153846154\",\"Discloses which tier one facility (or facilities) this processing facility works with\":\"\",\"List is publicly available as a csv or Excel spreadsheet\":\"0.7692307692\",\"Discloses what percentage of processing facilities is published\":\"\",\"Discloses 95% or higher of processing facilities are included in the list/map\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Publishes that this list or map of processing facilities has been updated within the past 6 months\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Race-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site (FTI Brazil only)\":\"\",\"Supplier list contributed to the Open Apparel Registry (assessed from 2022)\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Discloses aggregate business volume and percentage of suppliers (assessed from 2022)\":\"0.3846153846\",\"Nothing\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_2_Processing_Facilities_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2022_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174558,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3. Traceability Score (2022)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2022.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3. Traceability Score (2022)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 3. Traceability in the Fashion Transparency Index 2022?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p>The Fashion Transparency Index 2021 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p>This year for the second time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~13174542",
          "weight": 35.62
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174549",
          "weight": 35.62
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7605937",
          "weight": 28.77
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2022.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2022+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174608,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4.1A Know, Show & Fix: Human Rights Due Diligence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1A_Know_Show_Fix_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4.1A Know, Show & Fix: Human Rights Due Diligence",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 4.1A Know, Show & Fix: Human Rights Due Diligence in the Fashion Transparency Index 2022?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights impacts.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~13173059",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13173065",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5948526",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13173071",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13173077",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13173083",
          "weight": 16.67
        }
      ],
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1A_Know_Show_Fix_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174622,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4.1B Know, Show & Fix: Environmental Due Diligence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1B_Know_Show_Fix_Environmental_Due_Diligence.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4.1B Know, Show & Fix: Environmental Due Diligence",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~13173089",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13173095",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13173101",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13173107",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13173113",
          "weight": 20
        }
      ],
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_1B_Know_Show_Fix_Environmental_Due_Diligence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174726,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4.2 Know: Implementation of Supply Chain Policies",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4.2 Know: Implementation of Supply Chain Policies",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 4.2 Know: Implementation of Supply Chain Policies in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~13173119",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5969847",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5968765",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606045",
          "weight": 25
        }
      ],
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_2_Know_Implementation_of_Supply_Chain_Policies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174755,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Corrective Action Plans and Status by Named Facilities+Fashion Transparency Index 2022 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Corrective_Action_Plans_and_Status_by_Named_Facilities+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2022_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Corrective Action Plans and Status by Named Facilities",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index? ",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>When companies disclose remediation plans and status by named facilities it shows a clear commitment to transparency from brands and can drive improvements in supplier compliance. It also provides stakeholders with useful information that can enable labour and environmental issues to be resolved quickly and collaboratively.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4A_Fix_Remediation_Process_2022.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Corrective_Action_Plans_and_Status_by_Named_Facilities+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2022_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174763,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4.4A Fix: Remediation Process (2022)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4A_Fix_Remediation_Process_2022.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4.4A Fix: Remediation Process (2022)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 4.4A Fix: Remediation Process in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5964717",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5964464",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5964211",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174755",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13173125",
          "weight": 20
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_Fix_Remediation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4A_Fix_Remediation_Process_2022+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174772,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4.4.B Fix: Grievance Management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_B_Fix_Grievance_Management.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4.4.B Fix: Grievance Management",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 4.4.B Fix: Grievance Management in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5965476",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5966235",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5966488",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5966741",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5966994",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5967247",
          "weight": 16.67
        }
      ],
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_Fix_Remediation.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_B_Fix_Grievance_Management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174780,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4.4 Fix: Remediation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_Fix_Remediation.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4.4 Fix: Remediation",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 4.4 Fix: Remediation in the Fashion Transparency Index 2022?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~13174763",
          "weight": 45.45
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174772",
          "weight": 54.55
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2022.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_4_Fix_Remediation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174788,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4. Know, Show & Fix Score (2022)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2022.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4. Know, Show & Fix Score (2022)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 4. Know, Show & Fix in the Fashion Transparency Index 2022?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p>The Fashion Transparency Index 2022 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~13174608",
          "weight": 12
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174622",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174726",
          "weight": 8
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606918",
          "weight": 48
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174780",
          "weight": 22
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2022.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score_2022+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174798,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Tackling Modern Slavery Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Tackling_Modern_Slavery_Score.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Tackling Modern Slavery Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5953084",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13173131",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5952325",
          "weight": 33.33
        }
      ],
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Tackling_Modern_Slavery_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174807,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Purchasing Practices Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Purchasing Practices Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5950548",
          "weight": 8.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5950295",
          "weight": 8.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606126",
          "weight": 8.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606225",
          "weight": 8.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13173137",
          "weight": 8.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606234",
          "weight": 8.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5950042",
          "weight": 8.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606243",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5949538",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5949285",
          "weight": 8.33
        }
      ],
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Purchasing_Practices_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174816,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.1 Decent Work & Purchasing Practices (2022)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_2022.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.1 Decent Work & Purchasing Practices (2022)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5.1 Decent Work & Purchasing Practices in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>According to the ILO, working conditions are at the core of decent and dignified work. Generally speaking, working conditions cover a broad range of topics and issues, from working time (hours of work, rest periods, and work schedules) to remuneration, as well as the physical conditions and mental demands that exist in the workplaces. Here, we put the spotlight on some of the more egregious, thorny, endemic or hidden working conditions issues.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~13174798",
          "weight": 10.71
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606800",
          "weight": 32.14
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174807",
          "weight": 42.86
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606847",
          "weight": 14.29
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2022.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_2022+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174825,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Gender Equality Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Gender Equality Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for Gender Equality in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5948012",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5948273",
          "weight": 40
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5948020",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13173143",
          "weight": 20
        }
      ],
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Gender_Racial_Equality_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Gender_Equality_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174834,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.2 Gender & Racial Equality Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Gender_Racial_Equality_Score.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.2 Gender & Racial Equality Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for Gender & Racial Equality in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~13174825",
          "weight": 62.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606871",
          "weight": 37.5
        }
      ],
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 253,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2022.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Gender_Racial_Equality_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174842,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Decarbonisation, Deforestation and Regeneration Score (2022)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2022.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Decarbonisation, Deforestation and Regeneration Score (2022)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for Decarbonisation, Deforestation and Regeneration in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606567",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606576",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13173149",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5958394",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5958647",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5958141",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606612",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606621",
          "weight": 12.5
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity_2022.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2022+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174853,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.6 Climate Change & Biodiversity (2022)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity_2022.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.6 Climate Change & Biodiversity (2022)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5.6 Climate Change & Biodiversity in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~13174842",
          "weight": 44.44
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606630",
          "weight": 27.78
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606970",
          "weight": 27.78
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2022.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity_2022+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13174862,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5. Spotlight Issues Score (2022)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2022.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5. Spotlight Issues Score (2022)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5. Spotlight Issues in the Fashion Transparency Index 2022?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~13174816",
          "weight": 33.73
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174834",
          "weight": 9.64
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606910",
          "weight": 10.84
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606894",
          "weight": 13.25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606925",
          "weight": 10.84
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174853",
          "weight": 21.69
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2022.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2022+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13177685,
      "name": "Lucia Ixtacuy+Income Tax Expense (Euro)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Income_Tax_Expense_Euro.json",
      "designer": "Lucia Ixtacuy",
      "title": "Income Tax Expense (Euro)",
      "question": "How much income tax did the company pay (in Euros)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>What Is Income Tax?</p>\r\n<p>The term income tax refers to a type of tax that governments impose on income generated by businesses and individuals within their jurisdiction. By law, taxpayers must file an income tax return annually to determine their tax obligations.</p>\r\n<p>Income taxes are a source of revenue for governments. They are used to fund public services, pay government obligations, and provide goods for citizens.</p>\r\n<p>[[https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/incometax.asp|Source: Invistopedia]]</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Integrated Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Euro",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Income_Tax_Expense_Euro+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13178503,
      "name": "Lucia Ixtacuy+Net Zero Interim Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Net_Zero_Interim_Targets.json",
      "designer": "Lucia Ixtacuy",
      "title": "Net Zero Interim Targets",
      "question": "Has the company set interim targets to achieve its Net Zero goals?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Carbon neutrality is a state of net-zero carbon dioxide emissions. This can be achieved by balancing emissions of carbon dioxide with its removal (often through carbon offsetting) or by eliminating emissions from society (the transition to the \"post-carbon economy\").[1] The term is used in the context of carbon dioxide-releasing processes associated with transportation, energy production, agriculture, and industry.  Source: [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_neutrality|Wikipedia]].</p>\r\n<div>\"Specific short and medium-term interim targets requiring immediate action and accountability are of primary importance for credible corporate commitments to fight climate change, and should be the main focus of corporate target setting.\" [[https://newclimate.org/sites/default/files/2022/02/NewClimate_CCRM2022_Methodoloy.pdf|Source: New Climate Institute. Corporate Climate Responsibility Report 2022 ]]</div>\r\n<div> </div>",
      "methodology": "<p>The metric is based on the research and recommendations made in the GUIDANCE AND ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR GOOD PRACTICE CORPORATE EMISSION REDUCTION AND NET-ZERO TARGETS by the New Cimate Institute.</p>\r\n<blockquote><em>Select:</em></blockquote>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong><em> Yes. </em></strong>If the company discloses interim targets and reports on the progress against these targets, towards a state of net-zero carbon dioxide emissions.</li>\r\n<li><em><strong>No. </strong></em>If the company does not provide information about its interim targets.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>For example:</p>\r\n<p>Sony corporation pledged to achieve Zero environmental footprint by 20150. The corporation reports the following interim targets:</p>\r\n<p>• S1&amp;2: -72% by 2035 from 2018<br>• S3: -45% by 2035 from 2018</p>\r\n<p>Source: [[https://www.sony.com/en/SonyInfo/csr/library/reports/SustainabilityReport2021_E.pdf|Sony Sustainability Report 2021, p. 25. ]]</p>\r\n<p>Keywords: <strong>Medium-Term Environmental Targets, Environmental Target, </strong></p>\r\n<p>Note: A company that has a target to be achieved y 2040 or 20250 may report interim target to be achieved by 2025, 2030, 2035. <strong><br></strong></p>\r\n<p>The information can be found at any of the following reports published on the website of companies:<br><br>- Annual report<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility<br>- Sustainability Report<br>- Environmental Report<br>- Report on Carbon Footprint<br>- Non-financial information statement (EINF).</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 61,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 40,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Net_Zero_Interim_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13178783,
      "name": "Singh Anjali+Percentage of Sustainable Products",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Singh_Anjali+Percentage_of_Sustainable_Products.json",
      "designer": "Singh Anjali",
      "title": "Percentage of Sustainable Products",
      "question": "Does the company report the percentage of their products that are sustainable or eco-friendly?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies publish the percentage of their products that are sustainable or ecofriendly via advertisements and company reports.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go throught the company Sustainability Report and find out wheter the company discloses the percentage of sustainable products it produces.</p>\r\n<p>Select:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Yes- and company provides evidence or detail.</strong> When the company discloses such percentage and provides details tu sustain this claim. Include the percentage in the coments.</li>\r\n<li><strong>Yes, but no evidence or detail provided</strong>- When the company discloses such percentage but does not provide further details to sustain such claim. Include the percentage in the comments.</li>\r\n<li><strong>No</strong>- When the company does not report the percentage of products that are sustainable or ecofreindly.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes- and company provides evidence or detail",
        "Yes- but no evidence or detail provided",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Singh_Anjali+Percentage_of_Sustainable_Products+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13179121,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Reports on Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Reports_on_Freedom_of_Association_and_Collective_Bargaining.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Reports on Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining",
      "question": "Does the company report publicly on the number or percentage of supplier facilities with democratically elected unions and that are covered by collective bargaining agreements?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project is co-funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative tool called Fashion Checker.<br><br><a href=\"https://fashionchecker.org/\">Fashion Checker</a> enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company reports publicly on the number or percentage of supplier facilities with democratically elected unions and that are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents, annual reports and sustainability reports.<br><br><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and Search Terms</span><br><br>- Freedom of Association<br>- Collective bargaining<br>- Unionisation<br><br><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answer Input</span><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information.<br><br>Please note: 'Unknown' is not a possible answer for this metric.</p>\r\n<p>If the company has reported <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">publicly on the number or percentage of supplier facilities with democratically elected unions and that are covered by collective bargaining agreements</span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">, enter the answer as 'Yes'.</span></p>\r\n<p>If the company has not reported this information, enter the answer as 'No'.</p>\r\n<p>Please note: 'Unknown' is not a possible answer for this metric.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 61,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 35,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Reports_on_Freedom_of_Association_and_Collective_Bargaining+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13219256,
      "name": "Chris Adams+24/7 Carbon-free Energy Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Chris_Adams+24_7_Carbon_free_Energy_Target.json",
      "designer": "Chris Adams",
      "title": "24/7 Carbon-free Energy Target",
      "question": "Do companies have a specific target date for achieving a 24/7 carbon-free electricity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong>\"24/7 Carbon-free Energy Compact</strong></p>\r\n<p>An ambitious global effort is needed to accelerate the decarbonization of the world’s electricity systems to mitigate climate change and ensure access to clean and affordable electricity for all in line with SDG7.</p>\r\n<p>In response to the urgent need to drive rapid decarbonization across the global economy, a group of energy buyers, energy suppliers, governments, system operators, solutions providers, investors and other organizations has joined together to accelerate the decarbonization of electricity grids by adopting, enabling, and advancing 24/7 Carbon-free Energy (CFE).</p>\r\n<p><strong>24/7 Carbon-free Energy (CFE) means that every kilowatt-hour of electricity consumption is met with carbon-free electricity sources, every hour of every day, everywhere. It is both the end state of a fully decarbonized electricity system, and a transformative approach to energy procurement, supply, and policy design that is critical to accelerating its arrival.</strong></p>\r\n<p>The <a href=\"https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/2021/10/24-7cfe_compact_-_v2_updated.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">24/7 Carbon-free Energy Compact</a> is a set of <a href=\"https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/2021/09/principles_-_updated.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">principles</a> and actions that stakeholders across the energy ecosystem can commit to in order to drive systemic change. Due to the remarkable ongoing progress in clean energy and enabling technologies, the transition to a fully decarbonized electricity sector is possible. Achieving it will require a concerted and targeted effort by all stakeholders to develop and scale the energy policies, technologies, procurement practices, and solutions to transform the broader energy ecosystem to enable rapid and cost-effective achievement of 24/7 CFE for all.</p>\r\n<p>(...)</p>\r\n<p>To learn more about the growing movement for 24/7 Carbon-Free Energy, please visit <a href=\"https://www.gocarbonfree247.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.gocarbonfree247.com</a>.\" [[https://www.un.org/en/energy-compacts/page/compact-247-carbon-free-energy|Source]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<div>Select \"<strong>YES</strong>\" if:<br><br>- The company states a concrete target date to achieve 24/7 carbon free energy<br><br>Select  \"<strong>NO</strong>\" if :<br><br>- No such target can be found in any of the reports.<br><br>This information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' websites:<br><br>- Annual Report<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility Report<br>- Sustainability Report<br>- Environmental Report<br>- Carbon Footprint Report<br>- Statement of Non-Financial Information (NFI)</div>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 17,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 17,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Chris_Adams+24_7_Carbon_free_Energy_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13615491,
      "name": "Chris Adams+Net Zero Interim Target for 2025",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Chris_Adams+Net_Zero_Interim_Target_for_2025.json",
      "designer": "Chris Adams",
      "title": "Net Zero Interim Target for 2025",
      "question": "Has the company established an Net Zero interim target for 2025?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<blockquote><em>Select:</em></blockquote>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong><em> Yes. </em></strong>If the company has disclosed any form of carbon reduction interim targets for 2025 or earlier on the way to reaching net zero in the future.</li>\r\n<li><em><strong>No. </strong></em>If the company does not have an interim targets on the way to a stated net zero date in the future.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Integrated Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 128,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 7,
      "companies": 83,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Chris_Adams+Net_Zero_Interim_Target_for_2025+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13615502,
      "name": "Chris Adams+Net Zero Interim target for 2030",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Chris_Adams+Net_Zero_Interim_target_for_2030.json",
      "designer": "Chris Adams",
      "title": "Net Zero Interim target for 2030",
      "question": "Has the company established an Net Zero interim target for 2030?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Integrated Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 27,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Chris_Adams+Net_Zero_Interim_target_for_2030+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13619888,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Collective Bargaining Agreement in Place",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Collective_Bargaining_Agreement_in_Place.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Collective Bargaining Agreement in Place",
      "question": "Is there a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) in place at this facility?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p><strong>Collective Bargaining Agreement</strong>: written agreements regarding working conditions and terms of employment concluded between one or more employers or employers' organizations, on the one hand, and one or more representative workers' organizations or duly elected and authorised representatives of the workers (according to national laws and regulations), on the other. Ministries of Labour often maintain administrative records on CBA, including information on collective bargaining coverage, content and duration of the agreements.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.ilo.org/ilostat-files/Documents/Statistical%20Glossary.pdf\">ILO</a></p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": "<p>This information may be found: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>In a company supplier list / factory list</li>\r\n<li>In a trade union statement or report</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 621,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 621,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Collective_Bargaining_Agreement_in_Place+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13619900,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+% of Workers Covered by Collective Bargaining Agreement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+of_Workers_Covered_by_Collective_Bargaining_Agreement.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "% of Workers Covered by Collective Bargaining Agreement",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's workers are covered by a collective bargaining agreement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p><strong>Collective Bargaining Agreement</strong>: written agreements regarding working conditions and terms of employment concluded between one or more employers or employers' organizations, on the one hand, and one or more representative workers' organizations or duly elected and authorised representatives of the workers (according to national laws and regulations), on the other. Ministries of Labour often maintain administrative records on CBA, including information on collective bargaining coverage, content and duration of the agreements.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.ilo.org/ilostat-files/Documents/Statistical%20Glossary.pdf\">ILO</a></p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": "<p>This information may be found: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>In a company supplier list / factory list</li>\r\n<li>In a trade union statement or report</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 88,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 88,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+of_Workers_Covered_by_Collective_Bargaining_Agreement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13621136,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Human Rights Due Diligence Legislation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Human_Rights_Due_Diligence_Legislation.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Human Rights Due Diligence Legislation",
      "question": "Which mandatory human rights due diligence (mHRDD) laws apply to this company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>There is a growing number of legislations from governments, particularly in the EU, on mandatory human rights due diligence. This metric tracks which companies are subject to these laws. </p>\r\n<h5>German Supply Chain Act</h5>\r\n<p>The Supply Chain Act (Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz) is a German law requiring companies to monitor human rights and environmental risks in their supply chains.</p>\r\n<p>The law requires companies to carry out analyses on supply chain contracts to identify risks to human rights and requires companies to take action against identified risks. The companies will have to publish an annual report containing the analyses. Companies must also establish a complaint procedure for workers to report potential risks. The law additionally gives civil society organisations the ability to sue companies on behalf of workers over breaches of human rights in supply chains. Companies that fail to respect the terms of the law can face fines of up to two percent of the company's annual revenues.</p>\r\n<p>From 2023: Companies based in Germany with more than 3,000 employees, or German-registered branches of foreign companies with more than 3,000 employees</p>\r\n<p>From 2024: Companies based in Germany with more than 1,000 employees, or German-registered branches of foreign companies with more than 1,000 employees.</p>\r\n<p>Source: [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply_Chain_Act|Wikipedia.org]]</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 26,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 26,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Human_Rights_Due_Diligence_Legislation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13621353,
      "name": "Business Sustainability and Social Impact+Decent Work and Economic growth",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Sustainability_and_Social_Impact+Decent_Work_and_Economic_growth.json",
      "designer": "Business Sustainability and Social Impact",
      "title": "Decent Work and Economic growth",
      "question": "Did Seek limited perform something related to SDG8?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [
        "SDG 8"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Business Sustainability and Social Impact+Decent Work and Economic growth+Cong Danh Trieu"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Business_Sustainability_and_Social_Impact+Decent_Work_and_Economic_growth+Cong_Danh_Trieu.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Sustainability_and_Social_Impact+Decent_Work_and_Economic_growth+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13622994,
      "name": "Business Sustainability and Social Impact+Decent Work and Economic growth+Cong Danh Trieu",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Sustainability_and_Social_Impact+Decent_Work_and_Economic_growth+Cong_Danh_Trieu.json",
      "designer": "Business Sustainability and Social Impact",
      "title": "Decent Work and Economic growth",
      "question": "Did Seek Limited business start any processes to succeed on SDG 8 aim?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Business_substainbility_and_social_impact_Group+Seek_Limited_SDG8.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_Sustainability_and_Social_Impact+Decent_Work_and_Economic_growth+Cong_Danh_Trieu+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13652590,
      "name": "Business sustainability+SDGs8",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_sustainability+SDGs8.json",
      "designer": "Business sustainability",
      "title": "SDGs8",
      "question": "Did many companies follow SDGs to make them stronger?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"color: #4d4d4d; font-family: Roboto, Oswald;\">The Agenda for Sustainability Development, adopted by all United Nations Member States in 2015, provides a shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, now and into the future. At its heart are the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which are an urgent call for action by all countries - developed and developing - in a global partnership. They recognize that ending poverty and other deprivations must go hand-in-hand with strategies that improve health and education, reduce inequality, and spur economic growth – all while tackling climate change and working to preserve our oceans and forests.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Based on the annual report year, and the report's sustainability to see, which company follow SDGs?</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Business sustainability+SDGs8+Cong Danh Trieu"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Business_sustainability+SDGs8+Cong_Danh_Trieu.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_sustainability+SDGs8+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13652613,
      "name": "Business sustainability+SDGs8+Cong Danh Trieu",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_sustainability+SDGs8+Cong_Danh_Trieu.json",
      "designer": "Business sustainability",
      "title": "SDGs8",
      "question": "Did Seek Limited company have any process related to SDG8?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"box-sizing: inherit; color: #212121; font-family: Roboto-Regular; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: baseline;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: inherit; color: black;\"> SEEK is one of Australia’s Top</span> <span style=\"box-sizing: inherit; color: black;\">50* listed companies, employing more than 3,000 people across the globe. With a clear purpose of helping people live more fulfilling and productive working lives and help</span>ing<span style=\"box-sizing: inherit; color: black;\"> organisations succeed, SEEK has </span></span><span style=\"color: #212121; font-family: Roboto-Regular; font-size: 14px;\">exposure to 900 million people</span><span style=\"box-sizing: inherit; color: #212121; font-family: Roboto-Regular; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: baseline;\">,<span style=\"box-sizing: inherit; color: black;\"> 50 million candidate relationships and 300,000 hirer relationships. And What things can make Seek stronger and be the one of business sustainability. </span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Based on Seek Limited report's sustainability 2021</p>",
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"15\",\"No\":\"5\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Business_substainbility_and_social_impact_Group+Seek_Limited_SDG8.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_sustainability+SDGs8+Cong_Danh_Trieu+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13652666,
      "name": "Business substainbility and social impact Group+Seek Limited SDG8",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_substainbility_and_social_impact_Group+Seek_Limited_SDG8.json",
      "designer": "Business substainbility and social impact Group",
      "title": "Seek Limited SDG8",
      "question": "Did Seek Limited Company help the economy grow up?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"box-sizing: inherit; color: #212121; font-family: Roboto-Regular; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: baseline;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: inherit; color: black;\">SEEK is one of Australia’s Top</span> <span style=\"box-sizing: inherit; color: black;\">50* listed companies, employing more than 3,000 people across the globe. With a clear purpose of helping people live more fulfilling and productive working lives and help</span>ing<span style=\"box-sizing: inherit; color: black;\"> organisations succeed, SEEK has </span></span><span style=\"color: #212121; font-family: Roboto-Regular; font-size: 14px;\">exposure to 900 million people</span><span style=\"box-sizing: inherit; color: #212121; font-family: Roboto-Regular; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: baseline;\">,<span style=\"box-sizing: inherit; color: black;\"> 50 million candidate relationships and 300,000 hirer relationships.</span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Based on Seek Limited report sustainability 2021.</p>",
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8079667",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8062856",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7615233",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7615219",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8039725",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8062877",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13622994",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13652613",
          "weight": 12.5
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Business_substainbility_and_social_impact_Group+Seek_Limited_SDG8+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13652747,
      "name": "Cong Danh Trieu+MR",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Cong_Danh_Trieu+MR.json",
      "designer": "Cong Danh Trieu",
      "title": "MR",
      "question": "Did Seek Limited Company help the economy grow up?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>ABCDasdasdasdasdasdad</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>ABCDasdasdasd</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Cong_Danh_Trieu+MR+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13660278,
      "name": "B Lab+Overall B Impact Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/B_Lab+Overall_B_Impact_Score.json",
      "designer": "B Lab",
      "title": "Overall B Impact Score",
      "question": "What is the company's overall B Impact score?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": " \r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: 400;\">As a comprehensive impact management tool, the B Impact Assessment is categorized into five distinct impact areas that represent the company’s Governance and four key stakeholder groups: Workers, Community, Environment, and Customers.</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<ul style=\"margin-bottom: 0px;\">\r\n<li style=\"list-style-type: disc; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: 400;\">\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: bold;\">Governance</span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: 400;\"> evaluates a company's overall mission, engagement around its social/environmental impact, ethics, and transparency. This section also evaluates the ability of a company to protect their mission and formally consider stakeholders in decision making through their corporate structure (e.g. benefit corporation) or corporate governing documents.</span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<ul style=\"margin-bottom: 0px;\">\r\n<li style=\"list-style-type: disc; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: 400;\">\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: bold;\">Workers</span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: 400;\"> evaluates a company’s contributions to its employees’ financial security, health &amp; safety, wellness, career development, and engagement &amp; satisfaction. In addition, this section recognizes business models designed to benefit workers, such as companies that are at least 40% owned by non-executive employees and those that have workforce development programs to support individuals with barriers to employment.</span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<ul style=\"margin-bottom: 0px;\">\r\n<li style=\"list-style-type: disc; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: 400;\">\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: bold;\">Community</span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: 400;\"> evaluates a company’s engagement with and impact on the communities in which it operates, hires from, and sources from. Topics include diversity, equity &amp; inclusion, economic impact, civic engagement, charitable giving, and supply chain management. In addition, this section recognizes business models that are designed to address specific community-oriented problems, such as poverty alleviation through fair trade sourcing or distribution via microenterprises, producer cooperative models, locally focused economic development, and formal charitable giving commitments.</span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<ul style=\"margin-bottom: 0px;\">\r\n<li style=\"list-style-type: disc; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: 400;\">\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: bold;\">Environment</span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: 400;\"> evaluates a company’s overall environmental management practices as well as its impact on the air, climate, water, land, and biodiversity. This includes the direct impact of a company’s operations and, when applicable its supply chain and distribution channels. This section also recognizes companies with environmentally innovative production processes and those that sell products or services that have a positive environmental impact. Some examples might include products and services that create renewable energy, reduce consumption or waste, conserve land or wildlife, provide less toxic alternatives to the market, or educate people about environmental problems.</span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<ul style=\"margin-bottom: 0px;\">\r\n<li style=\"list-style-type: disc; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: 400;\">\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: bold;\">Customers</span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: 400;\"> evaluates a company’s stewardship of its customers through the quality of its products and services, ethical marketing, data privacy and security, and feedback channels. In addition, this section recognizes products or services that are designed to address a particular social problem for or through its customers, such as health or educational products, arts &amp; media products, serving underserved customers/clients, and services that improve the social impact of other businesses or organizations.</span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"> </p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"> </p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"> </p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: 400;\">Each impact area is organized by “Impact Topics” that describe the specific dimensions of impact relevant to that stakeholder.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"> </p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: 400;\">Within impact topics, weighted questions provide an indicator of a company’s positive impact based on its policies, practices, outputs, and outcomes. Impact topics may also include unweighted metric questions that provide additional context and assist in the accuracy of self-reporting.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"> </p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-weight: 400;\">[[https://kb.bimpactassessment.net/support/solutions/articles/43000574682-b-impact-assessment-structure|Source]].</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"> </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/B_Lab+Overall_B_Impact_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13660491,
      "name": "B Lab+B Corp Certification Status",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/B_Lab+B_Corp_Certification_Status.json",
      "designer": "B Lab",
      "title": "B Corp Certification Status",
      "question": "What is the company's (B Corp) certification status?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span><span>Certified B Corporations, or B Corps, are <strong>companies verified by B Lab to meet high standards of social and environmental performance, transparency, and accountability</strong>. B Corporation. B Corp Movement: Transforming the global economy to benefit all people, communities, and the planet.</span></span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Certified",
        "De-certified"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4712,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 4712,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/B_Lab+B_Corp_Certification_Status+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13662078,
      "name": "B Lab+Community B Impact Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/B_Lab+Community_B_Impact_Score.json",
      "designer": "B Lab",
      "title": "Community B Impact Score",
      "question": "What is the company's Community B Impact Score? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Investment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/B_Lab+Community_B_Impact_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13662298,
      "name": "B Lab+Customers B Impact Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/B_Lab+Customers_B_Impact_Score.json",
      "designer": "B Lab",
      "title": "Customers B Impact Score",
      "question": "What is the company's Customers B Impact Score? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/B_Lab+Customers_B_Impact_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13662320,
      "name": "B Lab+Governance B Impact Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/B_Lab+Governance_B_Impact_Score.json",
      "designer": "B Lab",
      "title": "Governance B Impact Score",
      "question": "What is the company's Governance B Impact Score? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/B_Lab+Governance_B_Impact_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13662372,
      "name": "B Lab+Workers B Impact Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/B_Lab+Workers_B_Impact_Score.json",
      "designer": "B Lab",
      "title": "Workers B Impact Score",
      "question": "What is the company's Workers B Impact Score? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/B_Lab+Workers_B_Impact_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13664645,
      "name": "B Lab+Best for the World Award",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/B_Lab+Best_for_the_World_Award.json",
      "designer": "B Lab",
      "title": "Best for the World Award",
      "question": "Has the company won a Best for the World award (specify category)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Every year, B Lab recognizes the top-performing B Corps creating great impact through their businesses. These B Corps are named Best for the World™, as their verified scores in the five impact areas evaluated on the B Impact Assessment - community, customers, environment, governance, and workers - are amongst the global top 5% in their corresponding size group. These businesses are proving that competing not only to be the best in the world, but the best for the world, is a winning strategy, and they can lead the way as more businesses continue to join the movement that is transforming the global economy to benefit all people, communities, and the planet.</p>\r\n<p>[[https://www.bcorporation.net/en-us/best-for-the-world|Source]].</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Change Maker",
        "Community Impact",
        "Customers",
        "Environment",
        "Governance",
        "Workers",
        "Overall"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4274,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1668,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/B_Lab+Best_for_the_World_Award+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13669756,
      "name": "B Lab+Industry Category",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/B_Lab+Industry_Category.json",
      "designer": "B Lab",
      "title": "Industry Category",
      "question": "Which industry category does the company operate in?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Accommodation & food service",
        "Administrative & support services",
        "Agriculture forestry & fishing",
        "Arts entertainment & recreation",
        "Construction",
        "Education",
        "Energy",
        "Energy Heating & Cooling",
        "Financial & insurance activities",
        "Human health & social work",
        "Information  communication & technology",
        "Manufactured Goods",
        "Other services",
        "Professional & technical services",
        "Publishing - Print",
        "Real estate design & building",
        "Rental & Repair",
        "Retail",
        "Transportation & storage",
        "Waste Management & Recycling",
        "Water & Sewerage",
        "Wholesale"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4712,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4712,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/B_Lab+Industry_Category+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13727080,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Digital Payment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Digital_Payment.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Digital Payment",
      "question": "Are workers in this facility paid their salary digitally?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>A digital payment, sometimes called an electronic payment, is the transfer of value from one payment account to another using a digital device such as a mobile phone, POS (Point of Sales) or computer, a digital channel communications such as mobile wireless data or SWIFT (Society for the Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication). This definition includes payments made with bank transfers, mobile money, and payment cards including credit, debit and prepaid cards.</p>\r\n<p>- Source: [[https://www.betterthancash.org/define-digital-payments|betterthancash.org]]</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Partially"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 141,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 141,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Digital_Payment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 13876554,
      "name": "B Lab+Approximate Number of Employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/B_Lab+Approximate_Number_of_Employees.json",
      "designer": "B Lab",
      "title": "Approximate Number of Employees",
      "question": "What is the approximate number of employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "0",
        "1-9",
        "10-49",
        "50-249",
        "250-999",
        "250+",
        "1000+"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7305,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4712,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Number_of_employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/B_Lab+Approximate_Number_of_Employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14019233,
      "name": "Walk Free+Living wage in supply chains",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Living_wage_in_supply_chains.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Living wage in supply chains",
      "question": "Does the company provide a commitment on, or detail their action to ensure living wages throughout their supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Low and underpayment of wages are an indicator of forced labour. Due to complex supply chains which span geographies that may not have strong national legislation/policies around living wages for workers, low wages can be common in the energy sector. Companies have a responsibility to ensure fair living wages for workers to reduce inequality and build more resilient supply chain.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">T</span>o meet this metric, companies must disclose that they have made commitments, or taken action, to <strong>tackle low or underpayment of wages in their supply chains</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>This can include:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Commitment to paying living wage or fair wages</li>\r\n<li>Action plan to pay living wage</li>\r\n<li>Number of suppliers where living wage is paid</li>\r\n<li>% of suppliers that have committed to pay living wage</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>These must be general commitments outside of commitments made in direct response to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\r\n<p>If the company discloses that it has made these commitments, or taken these actions to ensure that supply chain workers are paid a fair wage, please indicate <strong>“Yes”</strong>, and provide details.</p>\r\n<p>Mention of minimum wage is <strong>not</strong> sufficient.</p>\r\n<p>If no action exists or is described in the statement, please select <strong>“No”</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>If yes, in your comment please add the relevant section of the statement, including what type of information on supply chain workers’ wages is disclosed.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #e03e2d;\">* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>April</strong> 2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <strong>May</strong> 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 621,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 18,
      "companies": 394,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Living_wage_in_supply_chains+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14019271,
      "name": "Walk Free+Supply chain policy on labour outsourcing (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Supply_chain_policy_on_labour_outsourcing_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Supply chain policy on labour outsourcing (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose having a policy on labour outsourcing?\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p> </p>\r\n<p>In energy supply chains, labour outsourcing is a model that is particularly common at mining sites. It is used by multinational companies to reduce labour costs, limit their legal liabilities and prevent workers from unionizing. An in depth <a href=\"https://www.raid-uk.org/blog/cobalt-workers-exploitation\">study by RAID </a>on cobalt and copper mines in the DRC found that workers hired indirectly by mines earn extremely low wages, have limited or no healthcare benefits, and are often exposed to human rights abuses such as violence and discrimination.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">To meet this metric, companies must disclose that they have a policy on labour outsourcing, either </span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">prohibiting</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"> it or </span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">requiring suppliers to ensure the human and labor rights are respected for both direct and indirect workers</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p><strong style=\"font-weight: normal;\"> </strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">If the company discloses such a policy or measure, please indicate </span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">“Yes”</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">, and provide details.</span></p>\r\n<p><strong style=\"font-weight: normal;\"> </strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">If no such policy is mentioned in the statement, please select </span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">“No”</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"> </p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">A policy on 'contracting' or 'contractors' is not sufficient for a 'Yes', useless it specifies that in explicitly covers contracting a labor force. </span></p>\r\n<p><strong style=\"font-weight: normal;\"> </strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; text-align: justify; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #ff0000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; text-align: justify; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; text-align: justify; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Statement for FY2018/19 ending in </span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">April</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"> 2019 = 2018</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Statement for FY2018/19 ending in </span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">May</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"> 2019 (or later) = 2019</span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 83,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 6,
      "companies": 60,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Supply_chain_policy_on_labour_outsourcing_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14019285,
      "name": "Walk Free+Conflict mineral sourcing (sector specific)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Conflict_mineral_sourcing_sector_specific.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Conflict mineral sourcing (sector specific)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose any information on extra due diligence or precautions they are taking when it comes to sourcing minerals from conflict affected areas?\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p> </p>\r\n<p>“In conflict-affected and high-risk areas, companies involved in mining and trade in minerals have the potential to generate income, growth and prosperity, sustain livelihoods and foster local development. In such situations, companies may also be at risk of contributing to or being associated with significant adverse impacts, including serious human rights abuses and conflict.” <a href=\"https://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf\">OECD Guidelines</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">To meet this metric, the company must disclose that it takes extra precautions or due diligence steps with regards to sourcing minerals that come from conflict affected areas.</span></p>\r\n<p><strong style=\"font-weight: normal;\"> </strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">As per the </span><a href=\"https://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Due-Diligence-Guidance-Minerals-Edition3.pdf\" style=\"text-decoration: none;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #1155cc; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: underline; -webkit-text-decoration-skip: none; text-decoration-skip-ink: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">OECD Guidelines</span></a><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">:</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">“Conflict-affected and high-risk areas (CAHRAs) are identified by the presence of armed conflict, widespread violence or other risks of harm to people. Armed conflict may take a variety of forms, such as a conflict of international or non-international character, which may involve two or more states, or may consist of wars of liberation, or insurgencies, civil wars, etc. High-risk areas may include areas of political instability or repression, institutional weakness, insecurity, collapse of civil infrastructure and widespread violence. Such areas are often characterised by widespread human rights abuses and violations of national or international law.”</span></p>\r\n<p><strong style=\"font-weight: normal;\"> </strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">This is an indicative non-exhaustive </span><a href=\"https://www.cahraslist.net/\" style=\"text-decoration: none;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #1155cc; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: underline; -webkit-text-decoration-skip: none; text-decoration-skip-ink: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">list of CAHRAs</span></a><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"> under the EU regulation on conflict minerals.</span></p>\r\n<p><strong style=\"font-weight: normal;\"> </strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Examples of the types of policies or action companies may disclose, include: </span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Conflict minerals policy</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Responsible mineral sourcing policy</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Key words:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Conflict</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Mineral</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">CM policy</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">OECD</span><strong style=\"font-weight: normal;\"><br><br></strong></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; text-align: justify; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #ff0000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; text-align: justify; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; text-align: justify; background-color: #ffffff; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Statement for FY2018/19 ending in </span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">April</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans',sans-serif; color: #34343b; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"> 2019 = 2018</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Statement for FY2018/19 ending in </span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">May</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"> 2019 (or later) = 2019</span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 214,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 8,
      "companies": 187,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Conflict_mineral_sourcing_sector_specific+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14023600,
      "name": "Lucia Ixtacuy+Gender Equality Disclosure Rate - Own Operations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations.json",
      "designer": "Lucia Ixtacuy",
      "title": "Gender Equality Disclosure Rate - Own Operations",
      "question": "What percentage of the following (direct) gender equality indicators does the company disclose?\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var metrics, researched;\n\n  metrics = [M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M7, M8, M9, M10, M11, M12, M13, M14, M15, M16, M17, M18, M19];\n\n  researched = metrics.filter(function(val) {\n    return val !== \"NR\";\n  });\n\n  numKnown(researched) / researched.length * 100;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~836080",
          "name": "M1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~3193616",
          "name": "M2"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~836066",
          "name": "M3"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~837444",
          "name": "M4"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~900276",
          "name": "M5"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~837499",
          "name": "M6"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~5312044",
          "name": "M7"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~6966022",
          "name": "M8"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~900309",
          "name": "M9"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~836097",
          "name": "M10"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~837254",
          "name": "M11"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~837241",
          "name": "M12"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~1830298",
          "name": "M13"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~837335",
          "name": "M14"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~837320",
          "name": "M15"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~828453",
          "name": "M16"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~837515",
          "name": "M17"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~837526",
          "name": "M18"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "NR",
          "year": "2021",
          "metric": "~837376",
          "name": "M19"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1096,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 1096,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Lucia_Ixtacuy+Gender_Equality_Disclosure_Rate_Own_Operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14166621,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Number of Businesses Acquired",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Number_of_Businesses_Acquired.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Number of Businesses Acquired",
      "question": "What is the number of Businesses acquired by the company the reported year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri,Arial; font-style: normal; color: #000000;\">The number of businesses acquired by the entity during the period.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<div>\r\n<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p>\r\n<p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a></p>\r\n</div>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "business",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 185,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 77,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Number_of_Businesses_Acquired+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14172500,
      "name": "Commons+Partnership for Sustainable Textiles Member",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Partnership_for_Sustainable_Textiles_Member.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Partnership for Sustainable Textiles Member",
      "question": "Is the company a member of the German Partnership for Sustainable Textiles (Bündnis für nachhaltige Textilien)? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>As a multi-stakeholder initiative, the Textile Partnership brings together companies, associations, non-governmental organisations, standards organisations, trade unions and the German government. In addition, the Textiles Partnership cooperates with European and international initiatives in order to disseminate best practices and increase the leverage for its commitment.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.textilbuendnis.com/en/portrait-textilbuendnis/\">Partnership for Sustainable Textiles</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The member list of the Partnership for Sustainable Textiles can be found here: https://www.textilbuendnis.com/en/uebersicht/</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Member List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 71,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 71,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Multi_stakeholder_Initiative_Memberships_MSIs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Partnership_for_Sustainable_Textiles_Member+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14176892,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+Multi-stakeholder Initiative Memberships (MSIs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Multi_stakeholder_Initiative_Memberships_MSIs.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "Multi-stakeholder Initiative Memberships (MSIs)",
      "question": "Which multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) is this company a member of?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Fair Labor Association",
        "Ethical Trading Initiative - Full",
        "Ethical Trading Initiative - Foundation Stage",
        "Fair Wear Foundation",
        "Partnership for Sustainable Textiles",
        "Better Cotton Initiative",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": "Member List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var vals;\n\n  vals = [];\n\n  if (FLA === \"Yes\") {\n    vals.push(\"Fair Labor Association\");\n  }\n\n  if (ETI === \"Full\") {\n    vals.push(\"Ethical Trading Initiative - Full\");\n  }\n\n  if (ETI === \"Foundation Stage\") {\n    vals.push(\"Ethical Trading Initiative - Foundation Stage\");\n  }\n\n  if (PST === \"Yes\") {\n    vals.push(\"Partnership for Sustainable Textiles\");\n  }\n\n  if (BCI === \"Yes\") {\n    vals.push(\"Better Cotton Initiative\");\n  }\n\n  if (FWF === \"Current Member\") {\n    vals.push(\"Fair Wear Foundation\");\n  }\n\n  if (!vals.length) {\n    vals = \"None\";\n  }\n\n  vals;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~46944",
          "name": "FLA"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~168322",
          "name": "ETI"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~14172500",
          "name": "PST"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~5410970",
          "name": "FWF"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~14208578",
          "name": "BCI"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 450,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Multi_stakeholder_Initiative_Memberships_MSIs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14208578,
      "name": "Better Cotton Initiative (BCI)+Better Cotton Member",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Better_Cotton_Initiative_BCI+Better_Cotton_Member.json",
      "designer": "Better Cotton Initiative (BCI)",
      "title": "Better Cotton Member",
      "question": "Is this company a member of the Better Cotton Initiative?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><a href=\"https://bettercotton.org/\">Better Cotton Initative (BCI)</a> is an international nonprofit organization focused on setting standards for cotton production. It develops guidelines covering environmental management, social conditions, and farm-level practices. The organization works with implementing partners to provide training and support to cotton farmers in multiple countries. Its activities are supported by membership from farmers, suppliers, brands, retailers, and civil society organizations.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The list of Better Cotton members can be found here: bettercotton.org/membership/find-members/</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Member List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 501,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 361,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+Multi_stakeholder_Initiative_Memberships_MSIs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Better_Cotton_Initiative_BCI+Better_Cotton_Member+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311781,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Last Updated",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Last_Updated.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Last Updated",
      "question": "When was the end target last updated?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge. Data available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Last_Updated+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311788,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+ID Code",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+ID_Code.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "ID Code",
      "question": "What is the company's Net Zero Tracker ID?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+ID_Code+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311795,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+ISIN Id",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+ISIN_Id.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "ISIN Id",
      "question": "What is the company's ISIN ID?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+ISIN_Id+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311802,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Race To Zero Member",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Race_To_Zero_Member.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Race To Zero Member",
      "question": "Is the company member of the Race To Zero Campaign?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4897,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 4,
      "companies": 2029,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Race_To_Zero_Member+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311810,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+End Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "End Target",
      "question": "How does the company describe its target?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "1.5 C target",
        "Absolute emissions target",
        "Carbon negative",
        "Carbon neutral(ity)",
        "Climate neutral",
        "Climate positive",
        "Emissions intensity target",
        "Emissions reduction target",
        "GHG neutral(ity)",
        "Net zero",
        "No target",
        "Other",
        "Reduction v. BAU",
        "Science-based target",
        "Zero carbon",
        "Zero emissions"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4893,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2029,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311818,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+End Target Percentage Reduction",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Percentage_Reduction.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "End Target Percentage Reduction",
      "question": "What is the company's end target percentage reduction (in percentage)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>Data available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br><br>Source: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>More info: https://zerotracker.net/</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 668,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 445,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Percentage_Reduction+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311825,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+End Target Baseline Year",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Baseline_Year.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "End Target Baseline Year",
      "question": "What year is the end target to be achieved?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 689,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 462,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Baseline_Year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311832,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+End Target Intensity Unit",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Intensity_Unit.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "End Target Intensity Unit",
      "question": "What is the unit of the end target intensity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 84,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 58,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Intensity_Unit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311839,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+End Target Baseline Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Baseline_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "End Target Baseline Emissions",
      "question": "What is the end target baseline emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "MTCO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Baseline_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311847,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+End Target Target Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Target_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "End Target Target Emissions",
      "question": "What are the end-target target emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "MT CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 7,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Target_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311855,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+End Target Bau Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Bau_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "End Target Bau Emissions",
      "question": "What are the end target BAU emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "MTCO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Bau_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311863,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+End Target Other",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Other.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "End Target Other",
      "question": "What is another target of the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 100,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 85,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Other+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311870,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+End Target Year",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Year.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "End Target Year",
      "question": "What is the end target year?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net-zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge. Data available with attribution under a [[https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/| Creative Commons BY 4.0 License.]]<br><br>Source: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022.</p>\r\n<p><br>More info: [[https://zerotracker.net/ |https://zerotracker.net/]], [[https://zerotracker.net/methodology|https://zerotracker.net/methodology]]</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3154,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1544,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311877,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+End Target Status",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Status.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "End Target Status",
      "question": "What is the current status of the target?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>Data available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br><br>Source: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>More info: https://zerotracker.net/</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>\"Select the highest level that applies, ordered as:<br><br>Achieved (externally validates): Describe source of validation in notes<br><br>Achieved (self-declared): For net zero targets, include countries that report a negative GHG inventory to the UNFCCC<br><br>In law: Target prescribed in legislation or administrative order, has legal force.<br><br>In policy document: Target set in policy or planning document, including for countries Nationally Determined Contributions or Long Term Strategies in the UNFCCC.<br><br>In corporate strategy :Target set in policy or planning document. <br><br>Declaration / pledge: Entity has announced a target but not yet institutionalized that pledge in any way (e.g. just press release, verbal announcement, etc.)<br><br>Proposed / in discussion: The entity’s leadership has said it is considering a target or has joined an international initiative (like Climate Neutrality Coalition or Climate Ambition Alliance) pledging to set a net zero target but has not yet taken steps to operationalize this.\"</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Achieved (externally validated)",
        "Achieved (self-declared)",
        "In corporate strategy",
        "Declaration / pledge",
        "Proposed / In discussion"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3240,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1582,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Status+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311886,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Status Date",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Status_Date.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Status Date",
      "question": "What year was the current target status reached?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": "<p>Enter year when current target status was reached . For example, if current status is “in law”, enter the year the law came into force.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3119,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1562,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Status_Date+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311893,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Interim Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Interim Target",
      "question": "What is the company’s earliest interim target?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Absolute emissions target",
        "Emissions intensity target",
        "Emissions reduction target",
        "No target",
        "Other",
        "Reduction v. BAU"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4747,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 2018,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311901,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Interim Target Baseline Year",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target_Baseline_Year.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Interim Target Baseline Year",
      "question": "What is the interim target baseline?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1752,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 987,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target_Baseline_Year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311908,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Interim Target Intensity Unit",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target_Intensity_Unit.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Interim Target Intensity Unit",
      "question": "What is the unit of the interim target?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 125,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 87,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target_Intensity_Unit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311915,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Interim Target Baseline Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target_Baseline_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Interim Target Baseline Emissions",
      "question": "What are the interim target baseline emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "MTCO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 15,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 13,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target_Baseline_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311923,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Interim Target Target Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target_Target_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Interim Target Target Emissions",
      "question": "What are the interim target target emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "MT CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 17,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 15,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target_Target_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311931,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Interim Target BAU Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target_BAU_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Interim Target BAU Emissions",
      "question": "What is the interim target BAU emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "MTCO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target_BAU_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311939,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Interim Target Year",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target_Year.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Interim Target Year",
      "question": "What is the year for the company's earliest interim target?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1914,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1142,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target_Year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311946,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+End Target Text",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Text.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "End Target Text",
      "question": "Quote a text from a source describing the target.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2754,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1549,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+End_Target_Text+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311953,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Interim Target Text",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target_Text.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Interim Target Text",
      "question": "Direct quote from a source describing the target.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1870,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1124,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target_Text+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311960,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Target Notes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Target_Notes.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Target Notes",
      "question": "Brief description of targets and archived links to sources.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2360,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1430,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Target_Notes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311967,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Gasses Coverage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Gasses_Coverage.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Gasses Coverage",
      "question": "What gases are covered by the end target?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Carbon dioxide only",
        "Carbon dioxide and other GHGs",
        "Not specified"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4802,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2016,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Gasses_Coverage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311975,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Scope 1",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Scope_1.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Scope 1",
      "question": "Does the company publish information on its Scope 1 emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not specified"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3668,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1733,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Scope_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311983,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Scope 2",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Scope_2.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Scope 2",
      "question": "Does the company publish information on its Scope 2 emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not specified"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3666,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1732,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Scope_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311991,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Scope 3",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Scope_3.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Scope 3",
      "question": "Does the company publish information on its Scope 3 emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not specified",
        "Partial"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3659,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1730,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Scope_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14311999,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Historical Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Historical_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Historical Emissions",
      "question": "Does the target include historical emissions emitted by the entity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": "This question asks if the net zero target scope includes a goal to neutralise all historical emissions ever emitted by the entity? This is very rare e.g. Microsoft and Google are part of only a handful of current entities that plan to do this.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3265,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1580,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Historical_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312008,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Coverage Notes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Coverage_Notes.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Coverage Notes",
      "question": "Brief description of coverage and archived links to sources.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": "\"Brief description in your own words, including any key points not captured in the indicators above. Include relevant weblinks. \"",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1847,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1111,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Coverage_Notes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312016,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Has Plan",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Has_Plan.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Has Plan",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available plan that lays out steps toward its target?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": "\"We capture information on publicly available plans, recognizing that some may not be public. <br>\n<br>\nA plan is defined as a technical document that outlines concrete steps and measures that will be taken to advance toward the target, including a timeframe in which they will be taken. <br>\n<br>\nA detailed plan should include:<br>\nMeasures for all emission scopes that are covered by the target. For example, if the target covers all gases, but the plan only addresses carbon, this would not be met. <br>\nInformation on the emission reductions expected from these measures within a certain time period. For example, switching to renewable energy will save XX MT of emissions per year.<br>\nInformation on the extent to which measures will be applied (e.g. if switching to EVs, what share of the fleet; if installing an own solar PV installation, what is the installed capacity)<br>\nSchedule for regular review of measures. Is there a plan for regular review and updating? <br>\n\"",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3549,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1676,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Has_Plan+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312025,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Plan Options",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Plan_Options.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Plan Options",
      "question": "What are the plan options?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Information on the emission reductions expected from these measures within a certain time period",
        "Information on the extent to which measures will be applied (e.g. if switching to EVs what share of the fleet; if installing an own solar PV installation what is the installed capacity)",
        "Measures for all emission scopes that are covered by the target",
        "Schedule for regular review of measures"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1532,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 810,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Plan_Options+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312032,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Reporting Mechanism",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Reporting_Mechanism.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Reporting Mechanism",
      "question": "Does the actor have a public reporting mechanism?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No reporting mechanism",
        "Less than annual reporting",
        "Annual reporting"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3555,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1693,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Reporting_Mechanism+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312040,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Equity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Equity.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Equity",
      "question": "Does target plan refer to equity? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3458,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1656,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Equity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312048,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Governance Notes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Governance_Notes.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Governance Notes",
      "question": "Brief description of coverage and archived links to sources.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1766,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1042,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Governance_Notes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312055,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Carbon Credit Offsets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Carbon_Credit_Offsets.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Carbon Credit Offsets",
      "question": "Does the target allow for traded credits (offsets) from outside the actor’s territory / value chain to meet the target?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": "\"Many actors do not specify. <br>\n<br>\nOnly select yes if the sinks/credits will be obtained from outside the actor’s value chain. “Internal” removals are recorded in S4. For example, a region that is aiming to remove some of its emissions via a tree-planting programme within its own boundaries, administered by the regional government, would be recorded under S4, while that same region would be recorded under S1 if was purchasing credits from tree-planting programs elsewhere.\"",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not specified"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Use of Carbon Offsets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3547,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1672,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Carbon_Credit_Offsets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312064,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Carbon Credit Conditions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Carbon_Credit_Conditions.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Carbon Credit Conditions",
      "question": "If the target allow for traded credits (offsets) from outside the actor’s territory / value chain to meet the target, does the target impose conditions on trading credits (offsets)? Select all that apply.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No conditions specified",
        "Must be high environmental integrity",
        "Avoid social harm",
        "Avoid biodiversity harm",
        "Not include avoided emissions (e.g. via renewable energy projects)",
        "Not include emissions reductions (e.g. via greater efficiency)",
        "Not include biological sequestration (e.g. via afforestation)",
        "Maximum percentage of emissions that can be offset",
        "Other conditions"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Use of Carbon Offsets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1155,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 611,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Carbon_Credit_Conditions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312072,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Conditions Other",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Conditions_Other.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Conditions Other",
      "question": "Conditions Other",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 190,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 109,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Conditions_Other+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312079,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Removals Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Removals_Targets.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Removals Targets",
      "question": "Does the company have separate targets for emissions reductions and removals?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": "\"This is rare, as most entities do not separate their targets into reducing their emissions and neutralizing any residuals / historical emissions. <br>\nWhile currently rare, some actors differentiate their emissions reductions targets from their removals targets. For example, a company may say it is reducing its emissions from 100MT to 20MT (an 80% reduction), but then also committing to remove 20MT through other project.s <br>\nIf yes, please provide details in the notes. \"",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3280,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1608,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Removals_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312088,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Sinks And Credits Notes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Sinks_And_Credits_Notes.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Sinks And Credits Notes",
      "question": "Brief description of coverage and archived links to sources.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1412,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 860,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Sinks_And_Credits_Notes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312095,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Memberships",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Memberships.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Memberships",
      "question": "Is the entity part of any of the following? Tick all that apply.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Race to Zero (sub/non-state)",
        "Climate Ambition Alliance (countries)"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Memberships+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312103,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+GDP Real (PPP)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+GDP_Real_PPP.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "GDP Real (PPP)",
      "question": "What is the actor GDP real? (USD (note currency year when uploaded, e.g. constant 2019 dollars)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+GDP_Real_PPP+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312111,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Annual Revenue",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Annual_Revenue.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Annual Revenue",
      "question": "What is the company's Annual Revenue (USD (note currency year when uploaded, e.g. constant 2019 dollars)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4877,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2023,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Revenue.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Annual_Revenue.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Annual_Revenue+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312119,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Population",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Population.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Population",
      "question": "What is the actor's population?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Population+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312125,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Number of employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Number_of_employees.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Number of employees",
      "question": "What is the company's total number of employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "Employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4547,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1902,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Number_of_employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Number_of_employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312133,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Market Index",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Market_Index.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Market Index",
      "question": "What Market Index is the company listed on?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "S&P 500 (SPX)",
        "Dow Jones (DJI)",
        "Nasdaq (IXIC)",
        "FTSE 100 (UKX)",
        "Nikkei (NI225)"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Market_Index+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312141,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+GHG",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+GHG.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "GHG",
      "question": "What is the amount of GHG (in MT CO2e, Metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "MT CO2e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 17,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+GHG+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312149,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Inventory Year",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Inventory_Year.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Inventory Year",
      "question": "What is the year of inventory?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 69,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Inventory_Year+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312156,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Higher Net Zero",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Higher_Net_Zero.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Higher Net Zero",
      "question": "Does a higher administrative unit that the entity belongs to have a net-zero target in place?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>\nData available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br>\n<br>\nSource: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>\nMore info:  https://zerotracker.net/",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 31,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 16,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Higher_Net_Zero+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312209,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Sector",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Sector.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Sector",
      "question": "Which sector does the company operate in?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; font-style: normal;\">Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>Data available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br><br>Source: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>More info: https://zerotracker.net/</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 759,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 318,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312216,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Industry",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Industry.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Industry",
      "question": "Which industry does the company operate in?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; font-style: normal;\">Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>Data available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br><br>Source: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>More info: https://zerotracker.net/</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4889,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2026,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Industry+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312230,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Plans for carbon removal (CDR)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Plans_for_carbon_removal_CDR.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Plans for carbon removal (CDR)",
      "question": "Does the actor use or plan to use carbon removal within its target boundary (ie not external offsets)? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>Data available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br><br>Source: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>More info: https://zerotracker.net/</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>\"Target boundary refers to the coverage of emissions an entity is including in its target, defined by the “coverage” indicators above. For businesses this is often scopes 1 and 2 and sometimes 3, while for other entities it is typically territorial emissions.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>While many entities will rely on external offsets, some may take removal activities within their own operations. This is most common for countries and regions that plan to engage in land-use related projects, and relatively rare for other actor types.</p>\r\n<p>...\"</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes (unspecified)",
        "Yes (nature-based removals e.g. Forestation, soil carbon enhancement)",
        "Yes (CCS-based removals e.g. BECCS, DACCS)",
        "Yes (nature-based and CCS-based removals)",
        "No",
        "Not Specified"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Use of Carbon Offsets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3404,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1645,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Plans_for_carbon_removal_CDR+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312244,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Max Emissions Offset",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Max_Emissions_Offset.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Max Emissions Offset",
      "question": "What is the maximum percentage of emissions that can be offset?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>Data available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br><br><strong>Source</strong>: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br><strong>More info:</strong> https://zerotracker.net/</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Use of Carbon Offsets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Max_Emissions_Offset+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312253,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Accountability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Accountability.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Accountability",
      "question": "Is the leadership of the entity formally accountable for delivery on the target?\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; font-style: normal;\">Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>Data available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br><br>Source: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>More info: https://zerotracker.net/</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies: Is executive pay linked to the climate deliverables?</p>\r\n<p>For more info check the Net Zero Tracker codebook.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No",
        "Yes",
        "Not specified"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3538,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 1680,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Accountability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312264,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Source URL",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Source_URL.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Source URL",
      "question": "Link to the website(/s) where the information submitted into the form has come from, i.e. a link to the Net Zero plan.\r\n\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; font-style: normal;\">Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>Data available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br><br>Source: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>More info: https://zerotracker.net/</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Source_URL+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312275,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Interim Target Other",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target_Other.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Interim Target Other",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; font-style: normal;\">Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>Data available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br><br>Source: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>More info: https://zerotracker.net/</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Measures or steps that will be taken for all emission scopes that are covered by the target",
        "Information on the emission reductions expected from these measures within a certain time period",
        "Information on the extent to which measures/steps will be taken (e.g. if switching to EVs what share of the fleet; if installing an own solar PV installation what is the installed capacity)",
        "Schedule for regular review of measures"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target_Other+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14312285,
      "name": "Net Zero Tracker+Interim Target Percentage Reduction",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target_Percentage_Reduction.json",
      "designer": "Net Zero Tracker",
      "title": "Interim Target Percentage Reduction",
      "question": "What is the interim target percentage reduction?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Net Zero Tracker provides an overview of the 2 000 largest publicly-traded companies in the world by revenue. For those companies with a net zero (or other) target, Net Zero Tracker analyses the key components of that pledge.<br>Data available with attribution under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License. <br><br>Source: Net Zero Tracker. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, Data-Driven EnviroLab, NewClimate Institute, Oxford Net Zero. 2022. <br>More info: https://zerotracker.net/</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"> </span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1748,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 993,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Net_Zero_Tracker+Interim_Target_Percentage_Reduction+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14476013,
      "name": "Le Basic+Dividends",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Le_Basic+Dividends.json",
      "designer": "Le Basic",
      "title": "Dividends",
      "question": "How much dividends the company gave to its' shareholders",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>On s'intéresse au montant total des dividendes effectivement versés aux actionnaires de la maison mère.</p>\r\n<p>Pas les dividendes versé aux intérêts minoritaires.</p>\r\n<p>Pas le dividende par action.</p>\r\n<p>Les rapports annuels (\"document de référence\" ou \"document d'enregistrement universel\") contiennent cette information.</p>\r\n<p>Le rapport annuel d'une année X contient souvent un historique des dividendes versés et le montant qu'il est prévu de voter à l'Assemblée Générale suivante, puis distribuer au cours de l'année X+1.</p>\r\n<p>Ce dividende doit être associé à l'année X (l'année où les bénéfices qui sont distribués ont été fait), et non l'année X+1 (année où les dividendes sont effectivement distribué).</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "EUR",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 37,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 37,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Le_Basic+Dividends+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14477905,
      "name": "Le Basic+Share buyback",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Le_Basic+Share_buyback.json",
      "designer": "Le Basic",
      "title": "Share buyback",
      "question": "How much the company spent for share buyback?\r\nCombien la compagnie a dépensé en rachat d'action?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<h3>Qu'est-ce qu'on cherche ?</h3>\r\n<p>Ce qui nous intéresse, c'est le montant dépensé par l'entreprise pour racheter des actions de cette même entreprise, en vu de les annuler, et ainsi soutenir son cours de bourse.</p>\r\n<h3>Dans quel document chercher ?</h3>\r\n<p>Pour les entreprises côtées en bourse, cette information est présente dans les documents de référence annuels.</p>\r\n<p>En anglais (et donc sur wikirate) ces documents sont appelés \"Annual Report\", ou bien \"Universal Registration Document\" plus récemment.</p>\r\n<p>Ce sont des documents de plusieurs centaines de pages (à ne pas confondre avec des documents de quelques dizaines de pages donc).</p>\r\n<h3>Comment trouver l'information dans le document?</h3>\r\n<p>Une fois le document ouvert, en cherchant \"rachat\" si c'est en français, ou \"buyback\" pour l'anglais, vous devriez pouvoir balayer l'ensemble du document assez rapidement, pour trouver l'endroit où ça parle du \"programme de rachat d'actions\" (ou \"share buy-back program) de l'entreprise.</p>\r\n<p>Il faut trouver celui où ils parlent du bilan du programme de rachat d'action :</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Ne pas confondre avec le nombre d'actions achetées (on veut le montant en €uros)</li>\r\n<li>Ni le nombre d'action annulées (on veut les dépenses d'achat d'actions, pas le montant que représentent les actions annulées)</li>\r\n<li>Ni le montant total d'achat d'actions incluant les achats d'actions faits dans le cadre du programme de liquidité de l'entreprise sur ses propres actions, afin de rendre + liquide son action</li>\r\n<li>Ni des rachats d'actions d'autres entreprises, comme par exemple rachat de minoritaires</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<h5>Cas particuliers</h5>\r\n<p>Il se peut que le document ne mentionne pas de rachat d'actions. Dans ce cas, cela veut dire que l'entreprise n'en a pas fait. Il faut donc enregistrer zéro dans wikirate, et mettre en commentaire la recherche que vous avez fait sans rien trouver (par exemple : \"<em>j'ai cherché \"rachat\" dans tous le document, et aucun endroit ne mentionne de rachat d'actions</em>\", ou alors \"<em>J'ai cherché \"buyback\", \"buy-back\" et même \"buy\" et je n'ai rien trouvé de pertinent</em>\").</p>\r\n<p>Il se peut que le document mentionne une Autorisation donnée par l’Assemblée Générale au conseil d'administration de racheter des actions, mais sans montant associé. Dans ce cas, cela veut dire que l'entreprise n'en a pas fait. Il faut donc enregistrer zéro dans wikirate, et mettre en commentaire la page qui mentionne le programme sans donner de montant.</p>\r\n<h3>Comment noter le montant dans wikirate?</h3>\r\n<p>Une fois que vous avez trouvé le montant voulu, notez le montant dans wikirate ainsi que les informations suivantes dans le commentaire :</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>le numéro de page du fichier PDF (le numéro de page qui s'affiche dans le lecteur PDF, et pas le numéro de page écrit en bas de la page)</li>\r\n<li>le paragraphe contenant la réponse, ou le nom du tableau ( + ligne + colonne éventuellement)</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<h3>Comment commencer doucement?</h3>\r\n<p>Pour commencer la collecte sans prendre trop de risque, vous pouvez commencer par vérifier des données déjà collectées par quelqu'un.</p>\r\n<p>Vous pouvez aussi collecter des montant de rachat d'actions pas encore entré dans wikirate, et même si vous vous trompez sur le montant, si vous associez déjà le bon document à la réponse, cela simplifie le travail de vérification.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "EUR",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 531,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 98,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Le_Basic+Share_buyback+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14494609,
      "name": "Worker Rights Consortium+Facility Investigations: Issues Identified",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Worker_Rights_Consortium+Facility_Investigations_Issues_Identified.json",
      "designer": "Worker Rights Consortium",
      "title": "Facility Investigations: Issues Identified",
      "question": "What issues were identified by Worker Rights Consortium during investigations into this facility?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Worker Rights Consortium (WRC) maintains a global team of field investigators who have built an extensive network of relationships with unions, human rights groups, women’s organizations, and other civil society groups around the world.</p>\r\n<p>As part of this work, the WRC has conducted hundreds of factory investigations in more than two dozen countries, many in response to complaints from workers and worker organizations.</p>\r\n<p>This metric summarizes the issues found at specific facilities during the investigations.</p>\r\n<p>On the [[<span style=\"text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">https://www.workersrights.org/our-work/factory-investigations/|</span><span style=\"text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">WRC website]]</span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\"> you can find more information and browse case summaries, full public reports, and related documents and background information for many of these investigations. <br><br>Source: [[https://www.workersrights.org/our-work/factory-investigations/|Worker Rights Consortium]]</span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\"><span style=\"color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0);\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight);\">]</span></span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The data included in this metric is found on the Worker Rights Consortium website in their [[https://www.workersrights.org/our-work/factory-investigations/|Factory Investigations database]].</p>\r\n<p>Please note that because of the sensitivity of the dataset, this metric is non-researchable and data may only be added by the Designer.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Freedom of Association Violations",
        "Wrongful Termination",
        "Wage Theft",
        "Abuse and Harassment",
        "Health & Safety Violations",
        "Statutory Benefit Violations",
        "Gender-based Violence and Discrimination",
        "Wage and hour violations",
        "COVID-19",
        "Violence Against Workers",
        "Child Labor",
        "Living Wage",
        "Overtime Violations",
        "Factory Closure"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 83,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 80,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Worker_Rights_Consortium+Facility_Investigations_Issues_Identified+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14494620,
      "name": "Apparel Research Group+ESG Disclosure Rate Delta",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+ESG_Disclosure_Rate_Delta.json",
      "designer": "Apparel Research Group",
      "title": "ESG Disclosure Rate Delta",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reputational Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  rate - previous_rate;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "year": "2020",
          "metric": "~8085834",
          "name": "rate"
        },
        {
          "year": "2019",
          "metric": "~8085834",
          "name": "previous_rate"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 60,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 60,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Apparel_Research_Group+ESG_Disclosure_Rate_Delta+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14497077,
      "name": "Open Supply Hub+Facility Type",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Supply_Hub+Facility_Type.json",
      "designer": "Open Supply Hub",
      "title": "Facility Type",
      "question": "What type of facility is this? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The [[https://opensupplyhub.org/|Open Supply Hub]] is an open source map and database of global supply chain facilities, their affiliations and unique OS Hub IDs assigned to each facility.</p>\r\n<p>The OS Hub can be freely used to:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Update and standardize facility names and addresses against the database</li>\r\n<li>Understand affiliations of current and prospect facilities to identify opportunities for collaboration</li>\r\n<li>Find potential new suppliers, listed with their credentials and affiliations</li>\r\n<li>Leverage the OS Hub ID as a unique and shared ID across software systems and databases</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go directly to the <span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">[[https://opensupplyhub.org/|Open Supply Hub]] </span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">to find the facility you are researching and find the facility type(s).</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Final Product Assembly",
        "Office / HQ",
        "Printing / Product Dyeing / Laundering",
        "Raw Material Processing or Production",
        "Textile or Material Production",
        "Warehousing / Distribution"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3301,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2756,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Supply_Hub+Facility_Type+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14497224,
      "name": "Augusto Mathurin+Y/N simple question test",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Augusto_Mathurin+Y_N_simple_question_test.json",
      "designer": "Augusto Mathurin",
      "title": "Y/N simple question test",
      "question": "This is just a test.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Augusto_Mathurin+Y_N_simple_question_test+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14512079,
      "name": "Open Supply Hub+Processing Type",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Supply_Hub+Processing_Type.json",
      "designer": "Open Supply Hub",
      "title": "Processing Type",
      "question": "What is the processing type of this facility?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The [[https://opensupplyhub.org/|Open Supply Hub]] is an open source map and database of global supply chain facilities, their affiliations and unique OS Hub IDs assigned to each facility.</p>\r\n<p>The OS Hub can be freely used to:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Update and standardize facility names and addresses against the database</li>\r\n<li>Understand affiliations of current and prospect facilities to identify opportunities for collaboration</li>\r\n<li>Find potential new suppliers, listed with their credentials and affiliations</li>\r\n<li>Leverage the OS Hub ID as a unique and shared ID across software systems and databases</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go directly to the <span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">[[https://opensupplyhub.org/|Open Supply Hub]] </span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">to find the facility you are researching and find the facility's processing type(s).</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assembly",
        "Cut & Sew",
        "Cutting",
        "Final Product Assembly",
        "Finished Goods",
        "Ironing",
        "Knit Composite",
        "Knitwear Assembly",
        "Linking",
        "Making up",
        "Manufacturing",
        "Marker Making",
        "Molding",
        "Packaging",
        "Pattern Grading",
        "Pleating",
        "Product Finishing",
        "Ready Made Garment",
        "Sample Making",
        "Seam taping",
        "Sewing",
        "Steaming",
        "Stitching",
        "Tailoring",
        "Batch Dyeing",
        "Coating",
        "Continuous dyeing",
        "Direct Digital Ink Printing",
        "Dyeing",
        "Fabric All Over Print",
        "Fabric Chemical Finishing",
        "Fiber Dye",
        "Finishing",
        "Flat Screen Printing",
        "Garment Dyeing",
        "Garment Finishing",
        "Garment Place Print",
        "Garment Wash",
        "Hand Dye",
        "Laundering",
        "Laundry",
        "Pre-treatment",
        "Printing",
        "Product Dyeing and Laundering",
        "Product Dyeing",
        "Rotary Printing",
        "Screen Printing",
        "Spray Dye",
        "Sublimation",
        "Textile Chemical Finishing",
        "Textile Dyeing",
        "Textile Mechanical Finishing",
        "Textile Printing",
        "Tye Dye",
        "Washing",
        "Wet Processing",
        "Wet roller printing",
        "Yarn Dyeing",
        "Biological Recycling",
        "Boiling",
        "Breeding",
        "Chemical Recycling",
        "Chemical Synthesis",
        "Collecting",
        "Concentrating",
        "Disassembly",
        "Down Processing",
        "Dry Spinning",
        "Extrusion",
        "Ginning",
        "Hatchery",
        "Mechanical Recycling",
        "Melt Spinning",
        "Preparation",
        "Preparatory",
        "Processing Site",
        "Pulp making",
        "Raw Material Processing or Production",
        "Retting",
        "Scouring",
        "Shredding",
        "Slaughterhouse",
        "Slaughtering",
        "Sorting",
        "Spinning",
        "Standardization / Chemical finishing",
        "Synthetic Leather Production",
        "Tannery",
        "Tanning",
        "Textile Recycling",
        "Top making",
        "Twisting/Texturizing Facility",
        "Wet Spinning",
        "Yarn spinning",
        "Blending",
        "Bonding",
        "Buffing",
        "Circular Knitting",
        "Components",
        "Doubling",
        "Embellishment",
        "Embossing",
        "Embroidery",
        "Fabric mill",
        "Flat Knit",
        "Fusing",
        "Garment Accessories manufacturing",
        "Knitting",
        "Knitting Seamless",
        "Knitting V Bed",
        "Knitting Warp",
        "Lace Knitting",
        "Laminating",
        "Material Creation",
        "Material Production",
        "Mill",
        "Nonwoven Processing",
        "Nonwoven manufacturing",
        "Painting",
        "Pelletizing",
        "Pressing",
        "Spraying",
        "Straight Bar Knitting",
        "Textile Mill",
        "Textile or Material Production",
        "Weaving",
        "Welding",
        "Packing",
        "Warehousing / Distribution",
        "Office / HQ"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3176,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2685,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Supply_Hub+Processing_Type+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14543988,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Governance Structure (GRI 2-9-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Governance_Structure_GRI_2_9_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Governance Structure (GRI 2-9-a)",
      "question": "Does the company describe its governance structure, including committees of the highest governance body?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The governance disclosure metrics provide<span class=\"\"\" dir=\"ltr\" style=\"left: 9.58%; top: 13.53%; font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.00px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.03167);\" role=\"presentation\"\" style=\"left: 9.58%; top: 13.53%; font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.00px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.03167);\"> information about the organization’s governance structure (including committees)</span><span style=\"left: 9.58%; top: 14.95%; font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.00px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.0348);\">.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"left: 9.58%; top: 25.64%; font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.00px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.02396);\">Look if the company discloses in it sustainability report or any oficial document or page information about the</span><span class=\"\"\" dir=\"ltr\" style=\"left: 9.58%; top: 13.53%; font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.00px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.03167);\" role=\"presentation\"\" style=\"left: 9.58%; top: 13.53%; font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.00px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.03167);\"> structure, composition, </span><span style=\"left: 9.58%; top: 14.95%; font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.00px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.0348);\">knowledge, roles, and remuneration of its highest governing body (organization with </span><span style=\"left: 36.48%; top: 65.46%; font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.00px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.01415);\">the highest authority in the company or organization</span><span style=\"left: 9.58%; top: 14.95%; font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.00px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.0348);\">). </span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 2 - General Disclosures",
        "GRI Standards+2-9 Governance structure and composition",
        "GRI Standards+2-9-a Governance structure and committees"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Governance_Structure_GRI_2_9_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14544000,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Selection Process for Highest Governance Body (GRI 2-10-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Selection_Process_for_Highest_Governance_Body_GRI_2_10_a.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Selection Process for Highest Governance Body (GRI 2-10-a)",
      "question": "Does the company describe the nomination and selection processes for the highest governance body and its committees? \r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">This metric is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard Guidelines. </span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"left: 9.58%; top: 25.64%; font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.00px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.02396);\"> </span>This governance disclosure metric provides<span class=\"\"\" dir=\"ltr\" style=\"left: 9.58%; top: 13.53%; font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.00px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.03167);\" role=\"presentation\"\" style=\"left: 9.58%; top: 13.53%; font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.00px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.03167);\"> information about the nomination and selection processes for the highest governance body and its committees. </span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"left: 9.58%; top: 25.64%; font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.00px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.02396);\">Look if the company discloses in it sustainability report or any oficial document or page information about how the members of its </span><span style=\"left: 9.58%; top: 14.95%; font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.00px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.0348);\">highest governing body (organization with </span><span style=\"left: 36.48%; top: 65.46%; font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.00px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.01415);\">the highest authority in the company or organization) are nominated and selected. </span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 2 - General Disclosures",
        "GRI Standards+2-10 Nomination and selection of the highest governance body",
        "GRI Standards+2-10-a Nomination and selection process"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Selection_Process_for_Highest_Governance_Body_GRI_2_10_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14544012,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Percentage of employees receiving performance and career development reviews ( GRI 404-3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Percentage_of_employees_receiving_performance_and_career_development_reviews_GRI_404_3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Percentage of employees receiving performance and career development reviews ( GRI 404-3)",
      "question": "Does the company reports the percentage of employees receiving regular performance and career development reviews?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Knowledge Sharing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 404 - Training and Education",
        "GRI Standards+404-3 Percentage of employees receiving regular performance and career development reviews",
        "GRI Standards+404-3-a Performance and career development reviews by gender and employee category",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+S1 - Own Workforce",
        "ESRS Standards+S1.12 - Training and skills development metrics"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Percentage_of_employees_receiving_performance_and_career_development_reviews_GRI_404_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14544581,
      "name": "Open Supply Hub+Number of Workers (Range)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Supply_Hub+Number_of_Workers_Range.json",
      "designer": "Open Supply Hub",
      "title": "Number of Workers (Range)",
      "question": "How many workers does this company have?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The [[https://opensupplyhub.org/|Open Supply Hub]] is an open source map and database of global supply chain facilities, their affiliations and unique OS Hub IDs assigned to each facility.</p>\r\n<p>The OS Hub can be freely used to:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Update and standardize facility names and addresses against the database</li>\r\n<li>Understand affiliations of current and prospect facilities to identify opportunities for collaboration</li>\r\n<li>Find potential new suppliers, listed with their credentials and affiliations</li>\r\n<li>Leverage the OS Hub ID as a unique and shared ID across software systems and databases</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go directly to the <span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">[[https://opensupplyhub.org/|Open Supply Hub]] </span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">to find the facility you are researching and find the number of workers.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Less than 1000",
        "1001-5000",
        "5001-10000",
        "More than 10000"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4839,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4836,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Number_of_employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Supply_Hub+Number_of_Workers_Range+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14545360,
      "name": "Walk Free+Food & Beverages Sector",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Food_Beverages_Sector.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Food & Beverages Sector",
      "question": "Is the company considered to be part of the Food and Beverages sector?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var c1, c2, c3, c4;\n\n  c1 = m1.includes(\"Food and beverages/ agriculture and fishing\");\n\n  c2 = m2.includes(\"Food and Beverages Products\");\n\n  c3 = m3.includes(\"Food and beverages/ agriculture and fishing\");\n\n  c4 = m4.includes(\"Food & Beverages\");\n\n  if (statement.includes(\"No - Neither\")) {\n    \"Unknown\";\n  } else if (c1 || c2 || c3 || c4) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~8218714",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~887007",
          "name": "m2"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~8228797",
          "name": "m3"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~6248523",
          "name": "m4"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1827651",
          "name": "statement"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 72161,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 27338,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Food_Beverages_Sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14551649,
      "name": "Global Reporting Initiative+Percentage of female employees receiving performance and career development reviews ( GRI 404-3)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Percentage_of_female_employees_receiving_performance_and_career_development_reviews_GRI_404_3.json",
      "designer": "Global Reporting Initiative",
      "title": "Percentage of female employees receiving performance and career development reviews ( GRI 404-3)",
      "question": "Does the company reports the percentage of FEMALE employees receiving regular performance and career development reviews?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 404 - Training and Education",
        "GRI Standards+404-3 Percentage of employees receiving regular performance and career development reviews",
        "GRI Standards+404-3-a Performance and career development reviews by gender and employee category",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+S1 - Own Workforce",
        "ESRS Standards+S1.12 - Training and skills development metrics"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Global_Reporting_Initiative+Percentage_of_female_employees_receiving_performance_and_career_development_reviews_GRI_404_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14554858,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Beyond Compliance Disclosure Rate+Abigail Munroe",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate+Abigail_Munroe.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Beyond Compliance Disclosure Rate",
      "question": "What is the companies' disclosure rate on the metrics formulated based on either the UK home office statutory guidance accompanying the UK Modern Slavery Act or the Australian Modern Slavery Act guidance?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>This metric transposes the Beyond Compliance Disclosure Rate to a 10 point scale.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 15 * 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2538,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1584,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_disclosure_rate_overtime.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_Disclosure_Rate+Abigail_Munroe+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14554956,
      "name": "Ethan McCutchen+test delta",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Ethan_McCutchen+test_delta.json",
      "designer": "Ethan McCutchen",
      "title": "test delta",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Industrial Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Organic and Sustainable Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reputational Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  rate - previous_rate;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8085834",
          "name": "rate"
        },
        {
          "year": "-1",
          "metric": "~8085834",
          "name": "previous_rate"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 70,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 60,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Ethan_McCutchen+test_delta+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14555418,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Yearly Change in Average Net Worker Salary (EUR equivalent)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Yearly_Change_in_Average_Net_Worker_Salary_EUR_equivalent.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Yearly Change in Average Net Worker Salary (EUR equivalent)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "EUR",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  m1 - m2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~6019687",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "year": "-1",
          "metric": "~6019687",
          "name": "m2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 30,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 27,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Yearly_Change_in_Average_Net_Worker_Salary_EUR_equivalent+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14557991,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Beyond Compliance disclosure rate overtime",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_disclosure_rate_overtime.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Beyond Compliance disclosure rate overtime",
      "question": "How is the company's disclosure rate on the MSA Beyond Compliance metrics changing year on year?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  rate - previous_rate;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~14554858",
          "name": "rate"
        },
        {
          "year": "-1",
          "metric": "~14554858",
          "name": "previous_rate"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 586,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 366,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Beyond_Compliance_disclosure_rate_overtime+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14559761,
      "name": "RDR Testing+P17.1",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_1.json",
      "designer": "RDR Testing",
      "title": "P17.1",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose that it deploys advanced authentication methods to prevent fraudulent access?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Does the company clearly disclose that it deploys advanced authentication methods to prevent fraudulent access?</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Indicator guidance:</strong></p>\r\n<p>Companies should help users keep their accounts secure. They should clearly disclose that they use advanced authentication techniques to prevent unauthorized access to user accounts and information. We also expect companies to provide users with tools that enable them to secure their accounts and to know when their accounts may be compromised.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Potential Sources:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Company security center</li>\r\n<li>Company help pages or community support page</li>\r\n<li>Company account settings page</li>\r\n<li>Company blog</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "No disclosure found"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Cybersecurity Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "RDR Testing+P17.1+Augusto Mathurin"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_1+Augusto_Mathurin.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14559781,
      "name": "RDR Testing+P17.1+Augusto Mathurin",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_1+Augusto_Mathurin.json",
      "designer": "RDR Testing",
      "title": "P17.1",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose that it deploys advanced authentication methods to prevent fraudulent access? (Score)",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Cybersecurity Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\",\"No disclosure found\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_1+Augusto_Mathurin+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14559797,
      "name": "RDR Testing+P17.2",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_2.json",
      "designer": "RDR Testing",
      "title": "P17.2",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose that users can view their recent account activity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Does the company clearly disclose that users can view their recent account activity?</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Indicator guidance:</strong></p>\r\n<p>Companies should help users keep their accounts secure. They should clearly disclose that they use advanced authentication techniques to prevent unauthorized access to user accounts and information. We also expect companies to provide users with tools that enable them to secure their accounts and to know when their accounts may be compromised.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Potential Sources:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Company security center</li>\r\n<li>Company help pages or community support page</li>\r\n<li>Company account settings page</li>\r\n<li>Company blog</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "No disclosure found"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "RDR Testing+P17.2+Augusto Mathurin"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_2+Augusto_Mathurin.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14559809,
      "name": "RDR Testing+P17.2+Augusto Mathurin",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_2+Augusto_Mathurin.json",
      "designer": "RDR Testing",
      "title": "P17.2",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose that users can view their recent account activity? (Score)",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\",\"No disclosure found\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_2+Augusto_Mathurin+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14559817,
      "name": "RDR Testing+P17.3",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_3.json",
      "designer": "RDR Testing",
      "title": "P17.3",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose that it notifies users about unusual account activity and possible unauthorized access to their accounts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Does the company <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2020-indicators/#glossary-clearlydisclose\">clearly disclose</a> that it <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2020-indicators/#glossary-notifies\">notifies</a> <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2020-indicators/#glossary-user\">users</a> about unusual account activity and possible unauthorized access to their accounts?</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Indicator guidance:</strong></p>\r\n<p>Companies should help users keep their accounts secure. They should clearly disclose that they use advanced authentication techniques to prevent unauthorized access to user accounts and information. We also expect companies to provide users with tools that enable them to secure their accounts and to know when their accounts may be compromised.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Potential Sources:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Company security center</li>\r\n<li>Company help pages or community support page</li>\r\n<li>Company account settings page</li>\r\n<li>Company blog</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No",
        "No disclosure found"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Cybersecurity Risk & Resilience"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "RDR Testing+P17.3+Augusto Mathurin"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_3+Augusto_Mathurin.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14559829,
      "name": "RDR Testing+P17.3+Augusto Mathurin",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_3+Augusto_Mathurin.json",
      "designer": "RDR Testing",
      "title": "P17.3",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose that it notifies users about unusual account activity and possible unauthorized access to their accounts? (Score)",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Cybersecurity Risk & Resilience"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\",\"No disclosure found\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_3+Augusto_Mathurin+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14559838,
      "name": "RDR Testing+P17",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17.json",
      "designer": "RDR Testing",
      "title": "P17",
      "question": "Account security (digital platforms)",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>The company should help users keep their <a href=\"https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2020-indicators/#glossary-account\">accounts</a> secure.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Cybersecurity Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Cybersecurity Risk & Resilience"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~14559781",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~14559809",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~14559829",
          "weight": 33.33
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_Service_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14559884,
      "name": "RDR Testing+has service",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+has_service.json",
      "designer": "RDR Testing",
      "title": "has service",
      "question": "What services does this company own, and in which proportion?",
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_Service_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+has_service+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14559894,
      "name": "RDR Testing+is service owned by",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+is_service_owned_by.json",
      "designer": "RDR Testing",
      "title": "is service owned by",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+is_service_owned_by+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14559909,
      "name": "RDR Testing+P17 Service Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_Service_Score.json",
      "designer": "RDR Testing",
      "title": "P17 Service Score",
      "question": "P17 Account security (digital platforms) score.",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Score",
      "range": "0 to 10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Cybersecurity Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Cybersecurity Risk & Resilience"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  AVERAGE([p17]);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~14559884",
          "name": "has"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "company": "RDR Testing+has service",
          "metric": "~14559838",
          "name": "p17"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/RDR_Testing+P17_Service_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14569694,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Aircraft Rental",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Aircraft_Rental.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Aircraft Rental",
      "question": "What are the company's expenses incurred related to the lease of aircraft from outside third parties that are used in the entity's business operations.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Expenses incurred related to the lease of aircraft from outside third parties that are used in the entity's business operations.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 191,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 18,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Aircraft_Rental+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14569710,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Net Assets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Net_Assets.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Net Assets",
      "question": "What is the company's net of assets and liabilities.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The net of assets and liabilities.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 591,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 159,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Net_Assets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14569726,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Bank Loans",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Bank_Loans.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Bank Loans",
      "question": "What are the company's amounts due on short-term bank loans secured by customers' securities on the balance sheet date.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amounts due on short-term bank loans secured by customers' securities on the balance sheet date.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 33,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Bank_Loans+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14569742,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Business Development",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Business_Development.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Business Development",
      "question": "How much did the company spend on business development?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Business development involves the development of products and services, their delivery, design and their implementation. Business development includes a number of techniques designed to grow an economic enterprise. Such techniques include, but are not limited to, assessments of marketing opportunities and target markets, intelligence gathering on customers and competitors, generating leads for possible sales, follow-up sales activity, formal proposal writing and business model design. Business development involves evaluating a business and then realizing its full potential, using such tools as marketing, sales, information management and customer service.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 494,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 87,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Business_Development+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14569758,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Cash",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Cash.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Cash",
      "question": "What is the amount of currency on hand as well as demand deposits with banks or financial institutions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of currency on hand as well as demand deposits with banks or financial institutions. Includes other kinds of accounts that have the general characteristics of demand deposits. Excludes cash and cash equivalents within disposal group and discontinued operation.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10119,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1704,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Cash+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14569774,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Communications and Information Technology",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Communications_and_Information_Technology.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Communications and Information Technology",
      "question": "What is amount of company's expense in the period for communications and data processing?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The amount of expense in the period for communications and data processing expense.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethical Use of Technology",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1616,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 173,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Communications_and_Information_Technology+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14569790,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Compensation and Benefits Trust",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Compensation_and_Benefits_Trust.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Compensation and Benefits Trust",
      "question": "What is the value of a trust established by the company to hold the stock of an employee compensation and benefits plan?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The value of a trust established to hold the stock of an employee compensation and benefits plan as of the balance sheet date.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 140,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 29,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Compensation_and_Benefits_Trust+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14569936,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Cost of Revenue",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Cost_of_Revenue.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Cost of Revenue",
      "question": "What are the aggregated cost of goods produced and sold by the company and services rendered?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The aggregate cost of goods produced and sold and services rendered during the reporting period.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12949,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1764,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Cost_of_Revenue+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14569952,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Costs and Expenses",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Costs_and_Expenses.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Costs and Expenses",
      "question": "What are the total costs of sales of the company and operating expenses?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Total costs of sales and operating expenses for the period.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 16567,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1777,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Costs_and_Expenses+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14569968,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Costs of Franchised Outlets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Costs_of_Franchised_Outlets.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Costs of Franchised Outlets",
      "question": "What are the company's costs incurred that are directly related to generating franchise revenues from franchised outlets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Costs incurred that are directly related to generating franchise revenues from franchised outlets.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Costs_of_Franchised_Outlets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14569984,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Current Federal Tax Expense (Benefit)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Current_Federal_Tax_Expense_Benefit.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Current Federal Tax Expense (Benefit)",
      "question": "What is the amount of current federal tax expense (benefit)of the company pertaining to income (loss) from continuing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of current federal tax expense (benefit) pertaining to income (loss) from continuing operations.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 40730,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4132,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Current_Federal_Tax_Expense_Benefit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570000,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Current State and Local Tax Expense (Benefit)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Current_State_and_Local_Tax_Expense_Benefit.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Current State and Local Tax Expense (Benefit)",
      "question": "What is the amount of current state and local tax expense (benefit) of the company pertaining to income (loss) from continuing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of current state and local tax expense (benefit) pertaining to income (loss) from continuing operations.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 40574,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4004,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Current_State_and_Local_Tax_Expense_Benefit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570016,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Deferred Costs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Deferred_Costs.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Deferred Costs",
      "question": "What is the carrying amount of deferred costs of the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The carrying amount of deferred costs.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 916,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 205,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Deferred_Costs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570032,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Deferred Federal Income Tax Expense (Benefit)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Deferred_Federal_Income_Tax_Expense_Benefit.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Deferred Federal Income Tax Expense (Benefit)",
      "question": "What is the amount of deferred federal income tax expense (benefit) of the company pertaining to income (loss) from continuing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of deferred federal income tax expense (benefit) pertaining to income (loss) from continuing operations.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 40126,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4000,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Deferred_Federal_Income_Tax_Expense_Benefit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570048,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Deferred Foreign Income Tax Expense (Benefit)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Deferred_Foreign_Income_Tax_Expense_Benefit.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Deferred Foreign Income Tax Expense (Benefit)",
      "question": "What is the amount of deferred foreign income tax expense (benefit) of the company pertaining to income (loss) from continuing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of deferred foreign income tax expense (benefit) pertaining to income (loss) from continuing operations.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 23905,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2406,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Deferred_Foreign_Income_Tax_Expense_Benefit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570064,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Deferred Revenue",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Deferred_Revenue.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Deferred Revenue",
      "question": "What is the amount of deferred income and obligation of the company to transfer product and service to customer for which consideration has been received or is receivable?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of deferred income and obligation to transfer product and service to customer for which consideration has been received or is receivable.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4976,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1139,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Deferred_Revenue+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570080,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Dividends Payable",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Dividends_Payable.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Dividends Payable",
      "question": "What is the carrying value of the company of dividends declared but unpaid on equity securities issued by the entity and outstanding?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Carrying value as of the balance sheet date of dividends declared but unpaid on equity securities issued by the entity and outstanding.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4520,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 733,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Dividends_Payable+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570096,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Dividends Receivable",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Dividends_Receivable.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Dividends Receivable",
      "question": "What is the carrying amount of the company of dividends declared but not received?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Carrying amount as of the balance sheet date of dividends declared but not received.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 94,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Dividends_Receivable+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570112,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Environmental Expense and Liabilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Environmental_Expense_and_Liabilities.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Environmental Expense and Liabilities",
      "question": "What is the company's ajustment to exclude the noncash portion of, and include cash payments for environmental costs when calculating operating cash flows under the indirect method?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The adjustment to exclude the noncash portion of, and include cash payments for environmental costs when calculating operating cash flows under the indirect method. The adjustment can include the increase (decrease) during an accounting period in total estimated obligations recorded for probable future loss attributable to environmental contamination issues.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 152,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 29,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Environmental_Expense_and_Liabilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570128,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Environmental Remediation Expense",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Environmental_Remediation_Expense.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Environmental Remediation Expense",
      "question": "What is the charge against company's earnings for known or estimated future costs arising from requirements to perform environmental remediation activities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The charge against earnings in the period for known or estimated future costs arising from requirements to perform environmental remediation activities.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 908,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 170,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Environmental_Remediation_Expense+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570144,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Exploration Expense",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Exploration_Expense.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Exploration Expense",
      "question": "What are the exploration expenses of the compan (including prospecting) related to oil and gas producing entities and would be included in operating expenses of that entity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Exploration expenses (including prospecting) related to oil and gas producing entities and would be included in operating expenses of that entity. Costs incurred in identifying areas that may warrant examination and in examining specific areas that are considered to have prospects of containing oil and gas reserves, including costs of drilling exploratory wells and exploratory-type stratigraphic test wells. Exploration costs may be incurred both before acquiring the related property (sometimes referred to in part as prospecting costs) and after acquiring the property. Principal types of exploration costs, which include depreciation and applicable operating costs of support equipment and facilities and other costs of exploration activities, are: (i) Costs of topographical, geographical and geophysical studies, rights of access to properties to conduct those studies, and salaries and other expenses of geologists, geophysical crews, and others conducting those studies. Collectively, these are sometimes referred to as geological and geophysical or \"G&G\" costs. (ii) Costs of carrying and retaining undeveloped properties, such as delay rentals, ad valorem taxes on properties, legal costs for title defense, and the maintenance of land and lease records. (iii) Dry hole contributions and bottom hole contributions. (iv) Costs of drilling and equipping exploratory wells. (v) Costs of drilling exploratory-type stratigraphic test wells.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 956,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 132,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Exploration_Expense+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570160,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Franchisor Costs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Franchisor_Costs.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Franchisor Costs",
      "question": "What is the copany's aggregated costs incurred that are directly related to activities, including but not limited to, generating franchise revenues from franchisor owned outlets and franchised outlets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Aggregate costs incurred that are directly related to activities, including but not limited to, generating franchise revenues from franchisor owned outlets and franchised outlets.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 44,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 7,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Franchisor_Costs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570176,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Fuel Costs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Fuel_Costs.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Fuel Costs",
      "question": "How much was the company 's spending on fuel incurred that was directly related to goods produced and sold and services rendered?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Fuel costs incurred that are directly related to goods produced and sold and services rendered during the reporting period.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 711,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 68,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Fuel_Costs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570192,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Gain (Loss) on Contract Termination",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Gain_Loss_on_Contract_Termination.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Gain (Loss) on Contract Termination",
      "question": "What is the company's gain (loss) related to the termination of a contract between the parties?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Gain (loss) related to the termination of a contract between the parties. The termination may be due to many causes including early termination of a lease by a lessee, a breach of contract by one party, or a failure to perform.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1336,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 417,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Gain_Loss_on_Contract_Termination+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570208,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Gain (Loss) on Investments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Gain_Loss_on_Investments.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Gain (Loss) on Investments",
      "question": "What is the amount of realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4858,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 896,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Gain_Loss_on_Investments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570224,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+General Insurance Expense",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+General_Insurance_Expense.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "General Insurance Expense",
      "question": "What is the company's expense incurred with respect to protection provided by insurance entities against risks other than risks associated with production?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The expense in the period incurred with respect to protection provided by insurance entities against risks other than risks associated with production (which are allocated to cost of sales).",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1149,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 166,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+General_Insurance_Expense+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570240,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Income Taxes Paid",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Income_Taxes_Paid.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Income Taxes Paid",
      "question": "What is the company's amount of cash paid to foreign, federal, state, and local authorities as taxes on income?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The amount of cash paid during the current period to foreign, federal, state, and local authorities as taxes on income.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 25794,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3312,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Income_Taxes_Paid+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570256,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Income Taxes Receivable",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Income_Taxes_Receivable.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Income Taxes Receivable",
      "question": "What is the carrying amount as of the balance sheet date of income taxes of the company previously overpaid to tax authorities representing refunds of overpayments or recoveries based on agreed-upon resolutions of disputes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Carrying amount as of the balance sheet date of income taxes previously overpaid to tax authorities (such as U.S. Federal, state and local tax authorities) representing refunds of overpayments or recoveries based on agreed-upon resolutions of disputes. Also called income tax refund receivable.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Avoidance Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2847,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 590,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Income_Taxes_Receivable+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570277,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Increase (Decrease) in Income Taxes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Increase_Decrease_in_Income_Taxes.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Increase (Decrease) in Income Taxes",
      "question": "What is the increase (decrease)in the amounts payable to taxing authorities for taxes that are based on the reporting entity's earnings, net of amounts receivable from taxing authorities for refunds of overpayments or recoveries of income taxes, and in deferred and other tax liabilities and assets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The increase (decrease) during the reporting period in the amounts payable to taxing authorities for taxes that are based on the reporting entity's earnings, net of amounts receivable from taxing authorities for refunds of overpayments or recoveries of income taxes, and in deferred and other tax liabilities and assets.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1965,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 342,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Increase_Decrease_in_Income_Taxes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570293,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Increase (Decrease) in Income Taxes Receivable",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Increase_Decrease_in_Income_Taxes_Receivable.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Increase (Decrease) in Income Taxes Receivable",
      "question": "What is the increase (decrease) in income taxes receivable, which represents the amount due from tax authorities for refunds of overpayments or recoveries of income taxes paid?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The increase (decrease) during the reporting period in income taxes receivable, which represents the amount due from tax authorities for refunds of overpayments or recoveries of income taxes paid.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4655,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 688,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Increase_Decrease_in_Income_Taxes_Receivable+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570309,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Increase (Decrease) in Operating Assets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Increase_Decrease_in_Operating_Assets.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Increase (Decrease) in Operating Assets",
      "question": "What is the increase (decrease) in the aggregate amount of assets used to generate operating income?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The increase (decrease) during the reporting period in the aggregate amount of assets used to generate operating income.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 777,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 118,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Increase_Decrease_in_Operating_Assets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570325,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Increase (Decrease) in Operating Liabilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Increase_Decrease_in_Operating_Liabilities.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Increase (Decrease) in Operating Liabilities",
      "question": "What is the increase (decrease) in the aggregate amount of liabilities that result from activities that generate operating income?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The increase (decrease) during the reporting period in the aggregate amount of liabilities that result from activities that generate operating income.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1316,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 206,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Increase_Decrease_in_Operating_Liabilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570341,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Increase (Decrease) in Workers' Compensation Liabilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Increase_Decrease_in_Workers_Compensation_Liabilities.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Increase (Decrease) in Workers' Compensation Liabilities",
      "question": "What is the increase (decrease) in the amount due for insurance (or actual expenses) to cover the medical expenses and lost income for employees that are injured during the course of doing work-related activities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The increase (decrease) during the reporting period in the amount due for insurance (or actual expenses) to cover the medical expenses and lost income for employees that are injured during the course of doing work-related activities.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Personal Protective Equipment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 307,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 41,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Increase_Decrease_in_Workers_Compensation_Liabilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570357,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Information Technology and Data Processing",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Information_Technology_and_Data_Processing.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Information Technology and Data Processing",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's expenses incurred for information technology and data processing products and services?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The amount of expenses incurred in the period for information technology and data processing products and services.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3974,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 389,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Information_Technology_and_Data_Processing+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570373,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Insurance Investment Income",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Insurance_Investment_Income.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Insurance Investment Income",
      "question": "What is the investment income associated with the company's insurance services?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Investment income associated with the company's insurance services.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Insurance_Investment_Income+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570389,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Insurance Recoveries",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Insurance_Recoveries.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Insurance Recoveries",
      "question": "What is the amount recovered for the company from insurance?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The amount recovered from insurance. These recoveries reduce costs and losses that are reported as a separate line item under operating expenses.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 961,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 287,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Insurance_Recoveries+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570405,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Insurance Services Revenue",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Insurance_Services_Revenue.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Insurance Services Revenue",
      "question": "What is the company's revenue from insurance services, including net premiums earned, gain on sale of insurance block, agency management fees and insurance contract fees and commissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Revenue from insurance services, including net premiums earned, gain on sale of insurance block, agency management fees and insurance contract fees and commissions.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 249,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 35,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Insurance_Services_Revenue+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570421,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Insurance Settlements Receivable",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Insurance_Settlements_Receivable.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Insurance Settlements Receivable",
      "question": "What is the amount due in settlement of a claim for reimbursement from an insurance company when the Company has suffered a loss covered under an insurance policy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount due in settlement of a claim for reimbursement from an insurance company when the Company has suffered a loss covered under an insurance policy.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 386,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 150,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Insurance_Settlements_Receivable+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570437,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Interest Payable",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Interest_Payable.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Interest Payable",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's interest payable on debt, including, but not limited to, trade payables?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of interest payable on debt, including, but not limited to, trade payables.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5296,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 963,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Interest_Payable+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570453,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Interest Receivable",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Interest_Receivable.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Interest Receivable",
      "question": "Whay is the carrying amount of the company as of the balance sheet date of interest earned but not received?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Carrying amount as of the balance sheet date of interest earned but not received. Also called accrued interest or accrued interest receivable.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4993,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 717,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Interest_Receivable+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570468,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Investment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Investment.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Investment",
      "question": "What is the sum of the carrying amounts of the company as of the balance sheet date of all investments?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Sum of the carrying amounts as of the balance sheet date of all investments.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3726,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 613,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Investment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570484,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Land",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Land.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Land",
      "question": "What is the amount before accumulated depletion of real estate held for productive use by the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount before accumulated depletion of real estate held for productive use, excluding land held for sale.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Urban Development Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9271,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1162,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Land+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570500,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Legal Fees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Legal_Fees.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Legal Fees",
      "question": "What is the amount of expense of the company provided for legal costs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The amount of expense provided in the period for legal costs incurred on or before the balance sheet date pertaining to resolved, pending or threatened litigation, including arbitration and mediation proceedings.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2367,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 672,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Legal_Fees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570516,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Liabilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Liabilities.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Liabilities",
      "question": "What is the sum of the carrying amounts of the company as of the balance sheet date of all liabilities that are recognized?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Sum of the carrying amounts as of the balance sheet date of all liabilities that are recognized. Liabilities are probable future sacrifices of economic benefits arising from present obligations of an entity to transfer assets or provide services to other entities in the future.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 53075,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5345,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Liabilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570532,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Loans Assumed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Loans_Assumed.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Loans Assumed",
      "question": "What is the fair value of loans assumed in noncash investing or financing activities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The fair value of loans assumed in noncash investing or financing activities.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 465,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 135,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Loans_Assumed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570548,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Long-term Debt",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Long_term_Debt.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Long-term Debt",
      "question": "What is the amount, after unamortized (discount) premium and debt issuance costs, of the company's long-term debt.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount, after unamortized (discount) premium and debt issuance costs, of long-term debt. Includes, but not limited to, notes payable, bonds payable, debentures, mortgage loans and commercial paper. Excludes capital lease obligations.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 24439,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3656,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Long_term_Debt+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570564,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Long-term Investments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Long_term_Investments.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Long-term Investments",
      "question": "What is the total amount spend of investments that are intended to be held for an extended period of time?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The total amount of investments that are intended to be held for an extended period of time (longer than one operating cycle).",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 638,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Long_term_Investments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570580,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Long-term Pollution Control Bond",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Long_term_Pollution_Control_Bond.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Long-term Pollution Control Bond",
      "question": "What is the company's current and noncurrent portions of a debt security issued by a state to finance the construction of air- or water-pollution control facilities or sewage or solid waste disposal facilities pursuant to federal law?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Represents the current and noncurrent portions of a debt security issued by a state, certain agencies or authorities, a local government, or development corporation to finance the construction of air- or water-pollution control facilities or sewage or solid waste disposal facilities pursuant to federal law. The bonds are backed by the credit of the beneficiary of the financing rather than the credit of the issuer.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 77,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 13,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Long_term_Pollution_Control_Bond+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570596,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Long-term Transition Bond",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Long_term_Transition_Bond.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Long-term Transition Bond",
      "question": "What is the company's Long-Term transition bonds?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Long-Term transition bonds are bonds under the Competition Act in which the proceeds of Transition Bonds are required to be used principally to reduce qualified stranded costs and the related capitalization of the utility. This represents the current and noncurrent portions. The initial maturity is beyond one year or beyond the normal operating cycle, if longer.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Long_term_Transition_Bond+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570612,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Management Fee Expense",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Management_Fee_Expense.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Management Fee Expense",
      "question": "What is the amount of expenses related to the managing member or general partner for management of the day-to-day business functions of the limited liability company (LLC) or limited partnership (LP)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of expenses related to the managing member or general partner for management of the day-to-day business functions of the limited liability company (LLC) or limited partnership (LP).",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 771,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 184,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Management_Fee_Expense+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570628,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Manufacturing Costs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Manufacturing_Costs.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Manufacturing Costs",
      "question": "What is the aggregate costs of the company incurred in the production of goods for sale?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The aggregate costs incurred in the production of goods for sale.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 134,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 34,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Manufacturing_Costs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570644,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Marketing and Advertising Expense",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Marketing_and_Advertising_Expense.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Marketing and Advertising Expense",
      "question": "What is the total expense of the company recognized for promotion, public relations, and brand or product advertising?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The total expense recognized in the period for promotion, public relations, and brand or product advertising.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 5847,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 716,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Marketing_and_Advertising_Expense+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570660,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Mineral Rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Mineral_Rights.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Mineral Rights",
      "question": "What is the carrying amount at the balance sheet date of mineral rights of the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Carrying amount at the balance sheet date of mineral rights, or rights to extract a mineral from the earth or to receive payment in the form of a royalty for the extraction of minerals, net of amortization.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 227,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Mineral_Rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570687,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Net Investment Income",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Net_Investment_Income.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Net Investment Income",
      "question": "What is the amount, after investment expense, of income earned by the company from investments in securities and real estate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount, after investment expense, of income earned from investments in securities and real estate. Includes, but is not limited to, real estate investment, policy loans, dividends, and interest. Excludes realized gain (loss) on investments.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1673,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 172,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Net_Investment_Income+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570703,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Operating Expenses",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Operating_Expenses.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Operating Expenses",
      "question": "What is the generally recurring costsof the company associated with normal operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Generally recurring costs associated with normal operations except for the portion of these expenses which can be clearly related to production and included in cost of sales or services. Includes selling, general and administrative expense.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 32199,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3565,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Operating_Expenses+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570719,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Operating Income (Loss)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Operating_Income_Loss.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Operating Income (Loss)",
      "question": "What is the net result of the company for the period of deducting operating expenses from operating revenues?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The net result for the period of deducting operating expenses from operating revenues.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55233,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5190,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Operating_Income_Loss+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570735,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payment for Administrative Fees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payment_for_Administrative_Fees.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payment for Administrative Fees",
      "question": "What is the amount paid by the company to managing member or general partner for administrative services provided to the LLC or LP but not limited to, salaries, rent, or overhead costs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount paid to managing member or general partner, affiliate of managing member or general partner, or affiliate of limited liability company (LLC) or limited partnership (LP) for administrative services provided to the LLC or LP, for example, but not limited to, salaries, rent, or overhead costs.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 52,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payment_for_Administrative_Fees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570751,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payment for Incentive Fee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payment_for_Incentive_Fee.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payment for Incentive Fee",
      "question": "What is the amount paid by the company for incentive rights held by the managing member or general partner, of limited liability company (LLC) or limited partnership (LP)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount paid for incentive rights held by the managing member or general partner, of limited liability company (LLC) or limited partnership (LP).",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 7,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payment_for_Incentive_Fee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570767,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payment for Management Fee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payment_for_Management_Fee.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payment for Management Fee",
      "question": "What is the amount paid by the company to managing member or general partner for management of the day-to-day business functions of the limited liability company (LLC) or limited partnership (LP)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount paid to managing member or general partner for management of the day-to-day business functions of the limited liability company (LLC) or limited partnership (LP).",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 88,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 32,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payment_for_Management_Fee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570783,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments for Brokerage Fees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Brokerage_Fees.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments for Brokerage Fees",
      "question": "What is the amount of cash paid by the company for brokerage fees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The amount of cash paid for brokerage fees during the current period. This element is intended to represent the brokerage fees paid by and between financial industry participants.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 47,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Brokerage_Fees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570799,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments for Commissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Commissions.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments for Commissions",
      "question": "What is the amount of cash paid by the company for commissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The amount of cash paid for commissions during the current period.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 233,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 76,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Commissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570815,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments for Environmental Liabilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Environmental_Liabilities.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments for Environmental Liabilities",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's cash outflow for environmental remediation activities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Cash outflows made during the period for environmental remediation activities.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 252,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Environmental_Liabilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570831,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments for Legal Settlements",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Legal_Settlements.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments for Legal Settlements",
      "question": "What is the amount of cash paid by the company for the settlement of litigation or for other legal issues?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The amount of cash paid for the settlement of litigation or for other legal issues during the period.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 699,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 333,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Legal_Settlements+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570847,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments for Loans",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Loans.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments for Loans",
      "question": "How much did the company spend on payments for principal collection on loans related to operating activities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Cash payments for and related to principal collection on loans related to operating activities.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 232,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 101,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Loans+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570863,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments for Merger Related Costs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Merger_Related_Costs.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments for Merger Related Costs",
      "question": "What is the amount of cash paid by the company for charges associated with the mergers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The amount of cash paid during the reporting period for charges associated with the mergers.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 221,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 107,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Merger_Related_Costs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570879,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments for Nuclear Fuel",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Nuclear_Fuel.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments for Nuclear Fuel",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's cash outflow associated with the purchase of any material that is commonly used in the generation of nuclear energy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Cash outflow associated with the purchase of any material that is commonly used in the generation of nuclear energy.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 52,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Nuclear_Fuel+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570895,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments for Operating Activities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Operating_Activities.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments for Operating Activities",
      "question": "What is the total amount of cash paid by the company for operating activities during the current period.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Total amount of cash paid for operating activities during the current period.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 49,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Operating_Activities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570911,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments for Postemployment Benefits",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Postemployment_Benefits.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments for Postemployment Benefits",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's cash outflow for payments of postemployment benefits?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Cash outflows for payments of postemployment benefits (such as severance pay and health insurance benefits) recognized during the period. Postemployment benefits are benefits paid to employees after employment but before retirement.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Termination & Dismissal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 195,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 59,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Postemployment_Benefits+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570927,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments for (Proceeds from) Investments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Proceeds_from_Investments.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments for (Proceeds from) Investments",
      "question": "What is the net cash paid (received) by the company associated with the acquisition or disposal of all investments?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The net cash paid (received) associated with the acquisition or disposal of all investments, including securities and other assets.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1773,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 404,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Proceeds_from_Investments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570938,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments for (Proceeds from) Life Insurance Policies",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Proceeds_from_Life_Insurance_Policies.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments for (Proceeds from) Life Insurance Policies",
      "question": "What is the net cash inflow or outflow of the company for net proceeds and payments derived from carrying life insurance policies for which the entity is the beneficiary?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The net cash outflow or inflow for net proceeds and payments derived from carrying life insurance policies for which the entity is the beneficiary.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 532,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 111,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Proceeds_from_Life_Insurance_Policies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570959,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments for (Proceeds from) Nuclear Fuel",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Proceeds_from_Nuclear_Fuel.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments for (Proceeds from) Nuclear Fuel",
      "question": "What is the net cash inflow or outflow of the company from any material that is commonly used in the generation of nuclear energy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The net cash inflow or outflow from any material that is commonly used in the generation of nuclear energy.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 7,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Proceeds_from_Nuclear_Fuel+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570975,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments for Removal Costs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Removal_Costs.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments for Removal Costs",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's cash outflow related to disposal costs of plants?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Cash outflow related to disposal costs of plants, whether by demolishing, dismantling, abandoning, sale, and so forth during the period.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 87,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 15,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Removal_Costs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14570991,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments for Royalties",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Royalties.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments for Royalties",
      "question": "What is the amount of cash paid by the company for royalties?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The amount of cash paid for royalties during the current period.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 156,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 62,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_for_Royalties+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571007,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments to Acquire Buildings",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Buildings.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments to Acquire Buildings",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's cash outflow for acquisition of buildings (properties) whether for investment or use?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The cash outflow for acquisition of buildings (properties) whether for investment or use.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Urban Development Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 232,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 76,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Buildings+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571023,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments to Acquire Furniture and Fixtures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Furniture_and_Fixtures.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments to Acquire Furniture and Fixtures",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's cash outflow for acquisition of furniture and fixtures?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The cash outflow for acquisition of furniture and fixtures.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 233,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 53,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Furniture_and_Fixtures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571039,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments to Acquire Land",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Land.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments to Acquire Land",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's cash outflow from the acquisition of real estate intended to generate income for the owner?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The cash outflow from the acquisition of real estate intended to generate income for the owner, excludes land acquired for use by the owner.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Urban Development Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Conversion for Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 197,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 61,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Land+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571055,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments to Acquire Mineral Rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Mineral_Rights.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments to Acquire Mineral Rights",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's cash outflow from the acquisition of a mineral right?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The cash outflow from the acquisition of a mineral right which is the right to extract a mineral from the earth or to receive payment, in the form of royalty, for the extraction of minerals.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mining Impacts on Land",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 294,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 79,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Mineral_Rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571071,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments to Acquire Mining Assets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Mining_Assets.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments to Acquire Mining Assets",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's cash outflow from the purchase of mining and mining related assets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The cash outflow from the purchase of mining and mining related assets during the period.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mining Impacts on Land",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 146,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 42,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Mining_Assets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571087,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments to Acquire Oil and Gas Property",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Oil_and_Gas_Property.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments to Acquire Oil and Gas Property",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's cash outflow to purchase of mineral interests in oil and gas properties?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The cash outflow to purchase of mineral interests in oil and gas properties for use in the normal oil and gas operations and not intended for resale.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 647,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 122,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Oil_and_Gas_Property+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571103,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments to Acquire Real Estate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Real_Estate.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments to Acquire Real Estate",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's cash outflow from the acquisition of a piece of land?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The cash outflow from the acquisition of a piece of land, anything permanently fixed to it, including buildings, structures on it and so forth, includes real estate intended to generate income for the owner, excludes real estate acquired for use by the owner.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Urban Development Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1569,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 244,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Real_Estate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571119,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments to Acquire Waste Water Systems",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Waste_Water_Systems.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments to Acquire Waste Water Systems",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's cash outflow for  the purchase of waste water systems?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The cash outflow for the purchase of waste water systems which includes the waste treatment and disposal facility and equipment to households and industry.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Waste_Water_Systems+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571135,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments to Acquire Water and Waste Water Systems",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Water_and_Waste_Water_Systems.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments to Acquire Water and Waste Water Systems",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's cash outflow for the purchase of a facility and equipment that provides water supply?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The cash outflow for the purchase of a facility and equipment that provides water supply which includes wells, reservoirs, pumping stations, and control facilities, and waste water systems which includes the waste treatment and disposal facility and equipment to households and industry.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 54,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 5,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Water_and_Waste_Water_Systems+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571151,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments to Acquire Water Systems",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Water_Systems.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments to Acquire Water Systems",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's cash outflow for the purchase of a facility and equipment that provides water supply?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The cash outflow for the purchase of a facility and equipment that provides water supply which includes wells, reservoirs, pumping stations, and control facilities.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 45,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 7,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Acquire_Water_Systems+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571167,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payments to Suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Suppliers.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payments to Suppliers",
      "question": "What is the amount paid by the company to suppliers for goods and services during the current period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Payments of cash to suppliers for goods and services during the current period.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 85,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payments_to_Suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571183,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payment for Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payment_for_Pension_and_Other_Postretirement_Benefits.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payment for Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's cash outflow for pension and other postretirement benefits?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of cash outflow for pension and other postretirement benefits. Includes, but is not limited to, employer contribution to fund plan asset and payment to retiree.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1424,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 171,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payment_for_Pension_and_Other_Postretirement_Benefits+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571199,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Payment for Pension Benefits",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payment_for_Pension_Benefits.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Payment for Pension Benefits",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's cash outflow for pension benefit?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of cash outflow for pension benefit. Includes, but is not limited to, employer contribution to fund plan asset and payment to retiree. Excludes other postretirement benefit.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1894,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 270,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Payment_for_Pension_Benefits+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571215,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Prepaid Advertising",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Prepaid_Advertising.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Prepaid Advertising",
      "question": "What is the amount of asset related to consideration paid by the company in advance for advertising?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of consideration paid in advance for advertising that provides economic benefits within a future period of one year or the normal operating cycle, if longer.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1007,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 161,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Prepaid_Advertising+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571231,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Prepaid Insurance",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Prepaid_Insurance.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Prepaid Insurance",
      "question": "What is the amount of asset related to consideration paid by the company in advance for insurance?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of asset related to consideration paid in advance for insurance that provides economic benefits within a future period of one year or the normal operating cycle, if longer.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2699,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 465,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Prepaid_Insurance+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571247,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Prepaid Rent",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Prepaid_Rent.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Prepaid Rent",
      "question": "What is the Amount of asset related to consideration paid by the company in advance for rent?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of asset related to consideration paid in advance for rent that provides economic benefits within a future period of one year or the normal operating cycle, if longer.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 824,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 218,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Prepaid_Rent+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571263,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Prepaid Royalties",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Prepaid_Royalties.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Prepaid Royalties",
      "question": "What is the amount of asset related to consideration paid by the company in advance for royalties?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of asset related to consideration paid in advance for royalties that provide economic benefits within a future period of one year or the normal operating cycle, if longer.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 319,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 75,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Prepaid_Royalties+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571277,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Prepaid Taxes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Prepaid_Taxes.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Prepaid Taxes",
      "question": "What is the amount of asset related to consideration paid by the company in advance for income and other taxes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of asset related to consideration paid in advance for income and other taxes that provide economic benefits within a future period of one year or the normal operating cycle, if longer.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3532,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 540,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Prepaid_Taxes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571295,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Proceeds from Pollution Control Bond",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Proceeds_from_Pollution_Control_Bond.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Proceeds from Pollution Control Bond",
      "question": "How much cash inflow did the company have from amounts received from a long-term debt security issued by a state to finance the construction of air- or water-pollution control facilities or sewage or solid waste disposal facilities pursuant to federal law?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The cash inflow from amounts received from a long-term debt security issued by a state, certain agencies or authorities, a local government, or development corporation to finance the construction of air- or water-pollution control facilities or sewage or solid waste disposal facilities pursuant to federal law. The bonds are backed by the credit of the beneficiary of the financing rather than the credit of the issuer.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Proceeds_from_Pollution_Control_Bond+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571311,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Professional Fees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Professional_Fees.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Professional Fees",
      "question": "How much did the company pay for services from professionals such as doctors, lawyers and accountants?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "A fee charged for services from professionals such as doctors, lawyers and accountants. The term is often expanded to include other professions, for example, pharmacists charging to maintain a medicinal profile of a client or customer.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10736,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1543,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Professional_Fees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571327,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Repayments of Pollution Control Bond",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Repayments_of_Pollution_Control_Bond.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Repayments of Pollution Control Bond",
      "question": "How much cash outflow did the company have from settlements of a long-term debt security issued by a state of air- or water-pollution control facilities or sewage or solid waste disposal facilities pursuant to federal law?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The cash outflow from settlement of a long-term debt security issued by a state, certain agencies or authorities, a local government, or development corporation to finance the construction of air- or water-pollution control facilities or sewage or solid waste disposal facilities pursuant to federal law. The bonds are backed by the credit of the beneficiary of the financing rather than the credit of the issuer.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Repayments_of_Pollution_Control_Bond+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571343,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Retention Payable",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Retention_Payable.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Retention Payable",
      "question": "What is the amounts the company owed to vendors and subcontractors that have been withheld because of retainage provisions in a contract?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amounts owed to vendors and subcontractors that have been withheld because of retainage provisions in a contract.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 98,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 24,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Retention_Payable+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571359,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Royalty Expense",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Royalty_Expense.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Royalty Expense",
      "question": "What is the company's amount of expense related to royalty payments?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of expense related to royalty payments under a contractual arrangement such as payment for mineral and drilling rights and use of technology or intellectual property.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1426,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 270,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Royalty_Expense+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571370,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Severance Costs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Severance_Costs.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Severance Costs",
      "question": "How much did the company pay for special or contractual termination benefits provided to current employees involuntarily terminated under a benefit arrangement associated exit or disposal activities pursuant to an authorized plan?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of expenses for special or contractual termination benefits provided to current employees involuntarily terminated under a benefit arrangement associated exit or disposal activities pursuant to an authorized plan. Excludes expenses related to one-time termination benefits, a discontinued operation or an asset retirement obligation.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Termination & Dismissal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2746,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 795,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Severance_Costs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571386,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Sponsor Fees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Sponsor_Fees.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Sponsor Fees",
      "question": "How much did the company spend to advisors who provide certain management support and administrative oversight services?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Fees paid to advisors who provide certain management support and administrative oversight services including the organization and sale of stock, investment funds, limited partnerships and mutual funds.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 129,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 40,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Sponsor_Fees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571402,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Stock Issued",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Stock_Issued.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Stock Issued",
      "question": "How much is the fair value of company's stock issued in noncash financing activities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The fair value of stock issued in noncash financing activities.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6387,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1751,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Stock_Issued+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571418,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Prepaid Supplies",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Prepaid_Supplies.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Prepaid Supplies",
      "question": "What is the amount of consideration paid by the company in advance for supplies that provide economic benefits within a future? period",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Amount of consideration paid in advance for supplies that provide economic benefits within a future period of one year or the normal operating cycle, if longer.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 599,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 107,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Prepaid_Supplies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571434,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Taxes Payable",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Taxes_Payable.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Taxes Payable",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's payable taxes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Carrying value as of the balance sheet date of obligations incurred and payable for statutory income, sales, use, payroll, excise, real, property and other taxes.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1236,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 266,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Taxes_Payable+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571450,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Travel and Entertainment Expense",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Travel_and_Entertainment_Expense.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Travel and Entertainment Expense",
      "question": "What are the company's travel and entertainment expense?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Expenses incurred for travel and entertainment during the period.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 938,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 173,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Travel_and_Entertainment_Expense+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571466,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Trustee Fees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Trustee_Fees.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Trustee Fees",
      "question": "How much did the company pay for the professional services of a trustee?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Fees charged annually for the professional services of a trustee, usually quoted as a percentage of the funds being managed. The fee for appointing an offshore Trustee is included in the trust price.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 72,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 15,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Trustee_Fees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571482,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Unsecured Debt",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Unsecured_Debt.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Unsecured Debt",
      "question": "What is the amount of the company's unsecured debt?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Including the current and noncurrent portions, carrying value as of the balance sheet date of uncollateralized debt obligations (with maturities initially due after one year or beyond the operating cycle if longer).",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1434,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 283,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Unsecured_Debt+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571498,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Water Production Costs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Water_Production_Costs.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Water Production Costs",
      "question": "What is the company's water production costs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Cost incurred related to water production and may include cost of treatment plants, pumps, pipes and reservoir, purchased water, power and pump taxes as well as the cost of reducing water leakage.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 35,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Water_Production_Costs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571514,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Wells in Process of Drilling",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Wells_in_Process_of_Drilling.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Wells in Process of Drilling",
      "question": "What is the number of wells in process of drilling?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The number of wells in the process of being drilled in each geographic area as of the date listed.",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p><p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Wells_in_Process_of_Drilling+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14571530,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Workers' Compensation Liability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Workers_Compensation_Liability.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Workers' Compensation Liability",
      "question": "What is the company's carrying value of obligations and payables pertaining to claims incurred of a workers compensation nature?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Carrying value as of the balance sheet date of obligations and payables pertaining to claims incurred of a workers compensation nature.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies should report their financial performance in their annual financial reports, and these are the best places to find this information.</p>\r\n<p>For companies that file with the SEC, this information can be found within their \"Form 10-K\" filings. You can often find these documents by searching for \"Company 10-k\", or they can be found through the <a href=\"http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html\">SEC's EDGAR search</a>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Form 10-K",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 518,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 77,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Workers_Compensation_Liability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14612129,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Percentage of Workers Paid By Piece Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Percentage_of_Workers_Paid_By_Piece_Rate.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Percentage of Workers Paid By Piece Rate",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the approximate percentage of workers paid by piece rate in their supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Piece rate is defined as work paid according to the number of units produced (e.g. the number of T-shirts produced) instead of being paid on the basis of time spent on the job.<br>\nSource: [[https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---dialogue/documents/publication/wcms_663063.pdf|ILO]]. <br>\n<br>\n\"Workers whose pay is jointly determined by hourly pay and a piece rate (described as partial piece rate pay) are more likely to report reduced emotional and physical health compared to workers paid by the hour. Typically in these systems, workers receive the hourly base salary, which is often very low, and the incentive pay, based on the output, is obtained only if a certain output threshold is reached...suggesting that uncertainty or unpredictability in how payments are determined may be the driving factor of these detrimental effects.\"<br>\nSource: [[https://betterwork.org/2018/12/20/piece-rate-pay-brings-mixed-results-for-garment-workers-new-study-shows/|Better Work Programme]].",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the approximate percentage of workers paid by piece rate in their supply chain. This metric is looking for a disclosure which also shares the geographies/product types where piece rate pay is most prevalent.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Piece rate<br>\n- Per unit<br>\n- Hourly pay",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Percentage of Workers Paid By Piece Rate+Vasiliki Gkatziaki"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 704,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Percentage_of_Workers_Paid_By_Piece_Rate+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Percentage_of_Workers_Paid_By_Piece_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14612140,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Reports on Minimum Wage Paid for Daily / Piece Rate Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reports_on_Minimum_Wage_Paid_for_Daily_Piece_Rate_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Reports on Minimum Wage Paid for Daily / Piece Rate Workers",
      "question": "Does the company report on the proportion of piece-rate workers and/or daily wage workers who receive at least minimum wage payment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Disclosing wage data for workers in the supply chain demonstrates tangible outcomes of the company’s efforts to increase wages and take steps towards the payment of living wages to workers in its supply chain.<br>\n<br>\nDaily wage is defined as when the worker is paid a fixed rate for the hours they worked. Piece rate is defined as work paid according to the number of units produced (e.g. the number of T-shirts produced) instead of being paid on the basis of time spent on the job.<br>\nSource: [[https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---dialogue/documents/publication/wcms_663063.pdf|ILO]].",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company reports on the proportion of piece-rate workers and/or daily wage workers who receive at least minimum wage payment.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Piece rate<br>\n- Per unit<br>\n- Hourly pay<br>\n- Minimum wage",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Reports on Minimum Wage Paid for Daily / Piece Rate Workers+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 704,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reports_on_Minimum_Wage_Paid_for_Daily_Piece_Rate_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reports_on_Minimum_Wage_Paid_for_Daily_Piece_Rate_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14612151,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Proportion of Workers Paid Minimum Wage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Proportion_of_Workers_Paid_Minimum_Wage.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Proportion of Workers Paid Minimum Wage",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the proportion of factory workers who are paid at least minimum wages?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Disclosing wage data for workers in the supply chain demonstrates tangible outcomes of the company’s efforts to increase wages and take steps towards the payment of living wages to workers in its supply chain.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company reports on the proportion of factory workers who are paid at least minimum wages.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Hourly pay<br>\n- Minimum wage",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Proportion of Workers Paid Minimum Wage+Fashion Transparency Index 2023 - Scoring"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Proportion_of_Workers_Paid_Minimum_Wage+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2023_Scoring.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Proportion_of_Workers_Paid_Minimum_Wage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14612162,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Commitment to Degrowth",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Commitment_to_Degrowth.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Commitment to Degrowth",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a commitment to degrowth?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The degrowth movement prioritises social and ecological well-being instead of corporate profits, over-production and excess consumption. It requires radical redistribution, reduction in the material size of the global economy, and a shift in common values towards care, solidarity and autonomy. Importantly, this should be viewed primarily as the deliberate reduction of socially and environmentally damaging practices, like overproduction, excess consumption and usage of finite resources by the Global North.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses a commitment to degrowth.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Over-production<br>\n- Consumption<br>\n- Degrowth<br>\n- Redistribution",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Commitment to Degrowth+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 700,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 3,
      "companies": 252,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Commitment_to_Degrowth+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Commitment_to_Degrowth+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14612173,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Efforts to Invest in Supply Chain Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Efforts_to_Invest_in_Supply_Chain_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Efforts to Invest in Supply Chain Workers",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its efforts to provide upskilling and or investment in supply chain workers for a Just Transition to Circular Economy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The environmental and commercial benefits of a transition to circular fashion are clear, but the social impacts have received less attention. While a shift to circularity will create new roles and important opportunities for entrepreneurship, there are also serious challenges around marginalized groups, reskilling, and labor market disruption. <br>\n<br>\nSource: bsr.org/en/reports/circular-fashion-keeping-workers-in-the-loop",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses its efforts to provide upskilling and or investment in supply chain workers for a Just Transition to Circular Economy.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Just transition<br>\n- Circular economy / Circularity<br>\n- Upskill",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Efforts to Invest in Supply Chain Workers+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Efforts_to_Invest_in_Supply_Chain_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Efforts_to_Invest_in_Supply_Chain_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14612184,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Annual Investment in Decarbonisation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Annual_Investment_in_Decarbonisation.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Annual Investment in Decarbonisation",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the level of annual investment in decarbonisation to demonstrate action on decarbonisation targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Example of investments in decarbonisation include: investments in R&D, purchases of facilities, helping suppliers access finance to cover costs of a green transition, sustainability-linked loans, insetting back into supply chain such as investments in renewables or regenerative farming",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the level of annual investment in decarbonisation to demonstrate action on decarbonisation targets.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Supply chain investment<br>\n- Decarbonisation<br>\n- R&D<br>\n- Renewables<br>\n- Regenerative farming",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Annual Investment in Decarbonisation+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Annual_Investment_in_Decarbonisation+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Annual_Investment_in_Decarbonisation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14612195,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Coal Use",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Coal_Use.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Coal Use",
      "question": "Does the company disclose what proportion of production is powered by coal, including which geographies and sectors are affected?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This indicator tracks disclosure of brands' usage of suppliers powered by coal-fired boilers across their value chain. The first iteration of this indicator is to get a baseline understanding of if and how brands are disclosing this information.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the proportion of production is powered by coal, including which geographies and sectors are affected.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Coal-fired<br>\n- Coal",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Coal Use+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Coal_Use+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Coal_Use+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 14612936,
      "name": "Anaavce+Equity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Anaavce+Equity.json",
      "designer": "Anaavce",
      "title": "Equity",
      "question": "Is there gender balance in leadership positions at Qantas airways?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The idea is to show if there is gender balance in leadership positions at Qantas airways</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Research document</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "female employee"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Anaavce+Equity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15174608,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3.1 Tier One Factory Disclosure+Fashion Transparency Index 2023 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_1_Tier_One_Factory_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2023_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3.1 Tier One Factory Disclosure",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Name of Facility\":\"1.111111111111111\",\"Address\":\"1.111111111111111\",\"Type of products or services\":\"0.740740740740741\",\"Approximate number of workers at each site\":\"0.37037037037037\",\"Sex-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site\":\"0.37037037037037\",\"If facility has trade union\":\"0.740740740740741\",\"If the facility has an independent worker committee\":\"0.37037037037037\",\"% or number of migrant or contract workers\":\"0.37037037037037\",\"Certifications the facility has (if any) (2021 only)\":\"0.740740740740741\",\"Name of Parent Company (for each facility if applicable)\":\"1.111111111111111\",\"List is publicly available as a csv or Excel spreadsheet\":\"0.740740740740741\",\"Discloses what percentage of its tier one factories is published\":\"\",\"Discloses 95% or higher of tier one factories are included in the list/map\":\"0.37037037037037\",\"Publishes that this list or map of tier one factories has been updated within the past 6 months\":\"0.37037037037037\",\"Race-disaggregated breakdown of workers at each site (FTI Brazil only)\":\"\",\"Supplier list contributed to the Open Apparel Registry (assessed from 2022)\":\"0.37037037037037\",\"Discloses aggregate business volume and percentage of suppliers (assessed from 2022)\":\"0.37037037037037\",\"Weekly take-home wage (assessed from 2023)\":\"0.37037037037037\",\"Length of time worked with facility (assessed from 2023)\":\"0.37037037037037\",\"Nothing\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 255,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_1_Tier_One_Factory_Disclosure+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2023_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15221816,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3. Traceability Score (2023)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2023.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3. Traceability Score (2023)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 3. Traceability in the Fashion Transparency Index 2023?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\">While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\">The Fashion Transparency Index 2021 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\">Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\">This year for the second time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~15174608",
          "weight": 36.48648648648649
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174549",
          "weight": 35.13513513513514
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7605937",
          "weight": 28.37837837837838
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Traceability_Score_2023+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15366267,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4.3 Show: Facility Assessments (2023)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_3_Show_Facility_Assessments_2023.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4.3 Show: Facility Assessments (2023)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 4.3 Show: Facility Assessments in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5968259",
          "weight": 16.666666666666668
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5968006",
          "weight": 16.666666666666668
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5967753",
          "weight": 33.333333333333336
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5967500",
          "weight": 33.333333333333336
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_3_Show_Facility_Assessments_2023+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15366276,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4. Know, Show & Fix Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4. Know, Show & Fix Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 4. Know, Show & Fix in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~13174608",
          "weight": 14.285714285714286
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174622",
          "weight": 11.904761904761905
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174726",
          "weight": 9.523809523809524
        },
        {
          "metric": "~15366267",
          "weight": 42.857142857142854
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5977465",
          "weight": 7.142857142857143
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174772",
          "weight": 14.285714285714286
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Know_Show_Fix_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15366305,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Reports on Minimum Wage Paid for Daily / Piece Rate Workers+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reports_on_Minimum_Wage_Paid_for_Daily_Piece_Rate_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Reports on Minimum Wage Paid for Daily / Piece Rate Workers",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 685,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Reports_on_Minimum_Wage_Paid_for_Daily_Piece_Rate_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15366309,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Proportion of Workers Paid Minimum Wage+Fashion Transparency Index 2023 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Proportion_of_Workers_Paid_Minimum_Wage+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2023_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Proportion of Workers Paid Minimum Wage",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 445,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Proportion_of_Workers_Paid_Minimum_Wage+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2023_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15366314,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Towards Paying Living Wages Score (2023)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2023.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Towards Paying Living Wages Score (2023)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">The majority of garment workers around the world are paid below a living wage rate. A wage increase is an urgent matter for supply chain workers enabling them to support themselves and their families. </p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5952070",
          "weight": 9.090909090909092
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5951816",
          "weight": 9.090909090909092
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5951561",
          "weight": 9.090909090909092
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5951308",
          "weight": 9.090909090909092
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606171",
          "weight": 9.090909090909092
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5951055",
          "weight": 9.090909090909092
        },
        {
          "metric": "~15366305",
          "weight": 9.090909090909092
        },
        {
          "metric": "~15366309",
          "weight": 9.090909090909092
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5950801",
          "weight": 18.18181818181818
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23424749",
          "weight": 9.090909090909092
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2023+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15366322,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.1 Decent Work & Purchasing Practices (2023)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_2023.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.1 Decent Work & Purchasing Practices (2023)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5.1 Decent Work & Purchasing Practices in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>According to the ILO, working conditions are at the core of decent and dignified work. Generally speaking, working conditions cover a broad range of topics and issues, from working time (hours of work, rest periods, and work schedules) to remuneration, as well as the physical conditions and mental demands that exist in the workplaces. Here, we put the spotlight on some of the more egregious, thorny, endemic or hidden working conditions issues.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~13174798",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~15366314",
          "weight": 36.666666666666664
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174807",
          "weight": 40
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606847",
          "weight": 13.33333333333333
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Decent_Work_Purchasing_Practices_2023+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15366331,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Annual Investment in Decarbonisation+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Annual_Investment_in_Decarbonisation+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Annual Investment in Decarbonisation",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Annual_Investment_in_Decarbonisation+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15366336,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Decarbonisation, Deforestation and Regeneration Score (2023)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2023.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Decarbonisation, Deforestation and Regeneration Score (2023)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for Decarbonisation, Deforestation and Regeneration in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606567",
          "weight": 11.11111111111111
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606576",
          "weight": 11.11111111111111
        },
        {
          "metric": "~15366331",
          "weight": 11.11111111111111
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13173149",
          "weight": 11.11111111111111
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5958394",
          "weight": 11.11111111111111
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5958647",
          "weight": 11.11111111111111
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5958141",
          "weight": 11.11111111111111
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606612",
          "weight": 11.11111111111111
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606621",
          "weight": 11.11111111111111
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Decarbonisation_Deforestation_and_Regeneration_Score_2023+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15366343,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Coal Use+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Coal_Use+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Coal Use",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Use_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Coal_Use+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15366348,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Energy Use Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Use_Score.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Energy Use Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for Energy Use in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606639",
          "weight": 33.333333333333336
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606648",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~15366343",
          "weight": 16.666666666666668
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Use_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15366357,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Commitment to Degrowth+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Commitment_to_Degrowth+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Commitment to Degrowth",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 700,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 252,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_2023.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Overconsumption_Materials.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Overproduction.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Commitment_to_Degrowth+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15366361,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Efforts to Invest in Supply Chain Workers+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Efforts_to_Invest_in_Supply_Chain_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Efforts to Invest in Supply Chain Workers",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Efforts_to_Invest_in_Supply_Chain_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15366366,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.4 Overconsumption, Waste & Circularity (2023)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_2023.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.4 Overconsumption, Waste & Circularity (2023)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5.4 Overconsumption, Waste & Circularity in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<div style=\"box-sizing: border-box; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; background-color: #ffffff; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;\">\r\n<div style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\"> </div>\r\n</div>\r\n<div style=\"box-sizing: border-box; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; background-color: #ffffff; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;\">\r\n<div style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; font-size: 15.2px;\">Ensuring sustainable production and consumption patterns, minimising excess, tackling textile waste and moving towards circularity.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"box-sizing: border-box; transition: all 0.3s ease 0s; color: #7164d0; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-offset: 2px;\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>\r\n</div>\r\n</div>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5954852",
          "weight": 7.142857142857143
        },
        {
          "metric": "~15366357",
          "weight": 14.285714285714286
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606432",
          "weight": 7.142857142857143
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606441",
          "weight": 7.142857142857143
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606450",
          "weight": 7.142857142857143
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5954346",
          "weight": 7.142857142857143
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5953588",
          "weight": 7.142857142857143
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606477",
          "weight": 7.142857142857143
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606486",
          "weight": 7.142857142857143
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5953337",
          "weight": 7.142857142857143
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5955864",
          "weight": 7.142857142857143
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5955611",
          "weight": 7.142857142857143
        },
        {
          "metric": "~15366361",
          "weight": 7.142857142857143
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_4_Overconsumption_Waste_Circularity_2023+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15366427,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.6 Climate Change & Biodiversity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.6 Climate Change & Biodiversity",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5.6 Climate Change & Biodiversity in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~15366336",
          "weight": 45
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606630",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~15366348",
          "weight": 30
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_6_Climate_Change_Biodiversity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15366435,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5. Spotlight Issues Score (2023)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2023.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5. Spotlight Issues Score (2023)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for 5. Spotlight Issues in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~15366322",
          "weight": 33.333333333333336
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174834",
          "weight": 8.88888888888889
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606910",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~15366366",
          "weight": 15.555555555555555
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606925",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~15366427",
          "weight": 22.22222222222222
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Spotlight_Issues_Score_2023+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15366442,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Fashion Transparency Index 2023",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2023.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Fashion Transparency Index 2023",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index 2023?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p>The Fashion Transparency Index 2023 reviews and ranks 250 of the biggest global fashion and apparel brands and retailers according to how much information they disclose about their suppliers, supply chain policies and practices, and social and environmental impact.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p>This year for the fourth time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate’s open data platform. Having recently launched their benchmarks program, Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>\r\n<p>The Fashion Transparency Index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). It is not a Free Culture Licence. Please see the link for more information: <a href=\"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</a></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606840",
          "weight": 13.2
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13174525",
          "weight": 4.4
        },
        {
          "metric": "~15221816",
          "weight": 29.6
        },
        {
          "metric": "~15366276",
          "weight": 16.8
        },
        {
          "metric": "~15366435",
          "weight": 36
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2023+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15519369,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Fashion Transparency Index",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Fashion Transparency Index",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": "<p>The <strong>[[https://www.fashionrevolution.org/fashion-transparency-index/|</strong><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; font-size: 1rem;\">Fashion Transparency Index (FTI)</span><strong style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">]]</strong><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">, developed by [[https://www.fashionrevolution.org/|Fashion Revolution]], evaluates and ranks major global fashion brands and retailers based on the public disclosure of their social and environmental policies, practices, and impacts. The Index aims to promote greater transparency in the fashion industry by encouraging brands to reveal more information about their operations and supply chains.</span></p>\r\n<p>Each year, Fashion Revolution updates the FTI's scoring methodology. This descendant metric compiles all yearly scores in one place, providing an overview of how companies' transparency scores evolve over time.<br>For those interested in exploring the specific methodology or scoring details of a given year, please refer to the individual yearly metrics - <em>Fashion Revolution + Fashion Transparency Index {Year}</em>.<br>Links to all yearly metrics can be found in the <strong>Formula</strong> section of this metric.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion in Transition Planning",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5809535"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7608103"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13010310"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~15366442"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689949"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22254195"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1447,
      "bookmarkers": 2,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 269,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+FTI_Delta.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15519437,
      "name": "Aileen Rob+FTI Delta",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+FTI_Delta.json",
      "designer": "Aileen Rob",
      "title": "FTI Delta",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Crisis Response & Resilience",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+General Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Deforestation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion in Transition Planning",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  rate - previous_rate;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~15519369",
          "name": "rate"
        },
        {
          "year": "-1",
          "metric": "~15519369",
          "name": "previous_rate"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1174,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 258,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aileen_Rob+FTI_Delta+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15521506,
      "name": "Le Basic+Personnel Expenses",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Le_Basic+Personnel_Expenses.json",
      "designer": "Le Basic",
      "title": "Personnel Expenses",
      "question": "How much does the company allocate for employee expenses, including salaries, contributions, interests, etc.?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<h3>Qu'est-ce qu'on cherche ?</h3>\r\n<p>Ce qui nous intéresse, c'est le montant dépensé par l'entreprise pour son personnel (salaire et cotisation et intéressement etc...)</p>\r\n<h3>Dans quel document chercher ?</h3>\r\n<p>Pour les entreprises côtées en bourse, cette information est présente dans les documents de référence annuels.</p>\r\n<p>En anglais (et donc sur wikirate) ces documents sont appelés \"Annual Report\", ou bien \"Universal Registration Document\" plus récemment.</p>\r\n<p>Ce sont des documents de plusieurs centaines de pages (à ne pas confondre avec des documents de quelques dizaines de pages donc).</p>\r\n<h3>Comment trouver l'information dans le document?</h3>\r\n<p>Une fois le document ouvert, il faut trouver l'endroit où ils parlent des frais de personnel, en cherchant par mot clef (frais, personnel, salaire, etc...) ou en regardant dans le sommaire</p>\r\n<h3>Comment noter le montant dans Wikirate?</h3>\r\n<p>Une fois que vous avez trouvé le montant voulu, notez le montant dans Wikirate ainsi que les informations suivantes dans le commentaire :</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>le numéro de page du fichier PDF (le numéro de page qui s'affiche dans le lecteur PDF, et pas le numéro de page écrit en bas de la page)</li>\r\n<li>le paragraphe contenant la réponse, ou le nom du tableau ( + ligne + colonne éventuellement)</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<h3>Comment commencer doucement?</h3>\r\n<p>Pour commencer la collecte sans prendre trop de risque, vous pouvez commencer par vérifier des données déjà collectées par quelqu'un·e.</p>\r\n<p>Vous pouvez aussi collecter des montant de rachat d'actions pas encore entré dans Wikirate, et même si vous vous trompez sur le montant, si vous associez déjà le bon document à la réponse, cela simplifie le travail de vérification.</p>\r\n<hr>\r\n<h2>Methodology</h2>\r\n<h3><br>What are we looking for?</h3>\r\n<p>We're interested in the amount spent by the company on its staff (wages and contributions, profit-sharing, etc.).</p>\r\n<h3><br>What documents are we looking for?</h3>\r\n<p>For companies listed on the stock exchange, this information can be found in the annual reference documents.<br><br>In English (and thus on Wikirate) these documents are called \"Annual Report\", or more recently \"Universal Registration Document\".<br>These documents run to several hundred pages (not to be confused with documents of just a few dozen pages).</p>\r\n<h3>How do I find the information in the document ?</h3>\r\n<p><br>Once you've opened the document, you need to find the place where they talk about personnel costs, by searching by keyword (costs, personnel, salary, etc...) or by looking in the table of contents.</p>\r\n<h3><br>How do I enter the amount in Wikirate?</h3>\r\n<p><br>Once you've found the amount you're looking for, enter it in Wikirate along with the following information in the commentary: the page number of the PDF file (the page number displayed in the PDF reader, not the page number written at the bottom of the page) the paragraph containing the answer, or the name of the table ( + line + column if applicable)</p>\r\n<h3>How to get a smooth start?</h3>\r\n<p><br>To start collecting data without taking too much risk, you can begin by checking data already collected by someone else.<br><br>You can also collect share buyback amounts not yet entered into Wikirate, and even if you're wrong about the amount, if you already associate the right document with the answer, it simplifies the verification work.</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "EUR",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Le_Basic+Personnel_Expenses+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15523419,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Industry",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Industry.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Industry",
      "question": "What is the company's industry?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The private sector is critical to achieving the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. The SDG2000 list, created by the World Benchmarking Alliance, identifies the 2,000 most influential companies, from Algeria to Vietnam. These are the companies that are going to shape our future. In the coming years through benchmarking, WBA’s benchmarks can promote a ‘race to the top’ in which leaders are motivated to do more and laggards are held to account. This information will be free and available for everyone.</p>\r\n<p>The WBA relied primarily on Thomson Reuters Business Classification (TRBC) to build initial lists and supplemented this with wide-ranging additional research. The SDG 2000 list uses an industry categorisation developed by WBA but based on TRBC. </p>\r\n<p>- Source: [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/sdg2000/|World Benchmarking Alliance]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The industry of each company in the SDG2000 can be found <a href=\"https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/sdg2000/\">on this page</a>. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Agricultural Products",
        "Apparel & Footwear",
        "Asset Managers",
        "Automobiles & Components",
        "Banks",
        "Capital Goods",
        "Chemicals",
        "Conglomerates",
        "Construction & Engineering",
        "Construction Materials & Supplies",
        "Containers & Packaging",
        "Electronics",
        "Food & Beverage",
        "Hotels",
        "Insurance",
        "IT Software & Services",
        "Logistics",
        "Metals & Mining",
        "Oil & Gas",
        "Paper & Forest Products",
        "Passenger Transport",
        "Pension Funds",
        "Personal & Household Products",
        "Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology",
        "Real Estate",
        "Retail",
        "Sovereign Wealth Fund",
        "Telecommunications",
        "Tyres & Rubber",
        "Utilities",
        "Waste Management"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1986,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1986,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Industry+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15542989,
      "name": "Bill Ho+Total Waste Recycled, GRI 306-2 (formerly G4-EN23-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Bill_Ho+Total_Waste_Recycled_GRI_306_2_formerly_G4_EN23_a.json",
      "designer": "Bill Ho",
      "title": "Total Waste Recycled, GRI 306-2 (formerly G4-EN23-a)",
      "question": "What is the total amount of waste recycled by the organization (in metric tonnes)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Waste (tonnes) - recycled</p>\r\n<p>FY23 - 301,817 tonnes</p>\r\n<p>Covers 1 July 2022- 30 June 2023 (except the data received from Cleanaway which cover 27 June 2022 to 25 June 2023).</p>\r\n<p>Solid material diverted from landfill e.g. reused, recycled, repurposed, composted or converted to energy. Excludes all liquids, except high-strength sludges and liquids diverted for use as food.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "301,817",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Bill_Ho+Total_Waste_Recycled_GRI_306_2_formerly_G4_EN23_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15544226,
      "name": "Shibojyoti Dutta+Environmental Fines per Million Direct Economic Value Generated",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Shibojyoti_Dutta+Environmental_Fines_per_Million_Direct_Economic_Value_Generated.json",
      "designer": "Shibojyoti Dutta",
      "title": "Environmental Fines per Million Direct Economic Value Generated",
      "question": "\"Environmental Fines, GRI 307-1 (formerly G4-EN29-a)\" per Million \"Direct Economic Value Generated, GRI 201-1 (formerly G4-EC1-a)\"\r\n",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [
        "Estimated equivalent Financial Liability of Non-monetary Fine and impact on Brand impairment"
      ],
      "report_type": "Integrated Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Units per Million Units Value Generated",
      "range": "0 to 1000000",
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var Fine;\n\n  Fine = a / b * 1000000;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~4579145",
          "name": "a"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~1381637",
          "name": "b"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Shibojyoti_Dutta+Environmental_Fines_per_Million_Direct_Economic_Value_Generated+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15552685,
      "name": "Phu Ho+Total Waste Recycled by Coles, GRI 306-2 (formerly G4-EN23-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Phu_Ho+Total_Waste_Recycled_by_Coles_GRI_306_2_formerly_G4_EN23_a.json",
      "designer": "Phu Ho",
      "title": "Total Waste Recycled by Coles, GRI 306-2 (formerly G4-EN23-a)",
      "question": "What is the total amount of waste recycled by the organization?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Waste (tonnes) - recycled</span></strong><br style=\"color: #7ac774;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">FY23 - 301,817 tonnes</span></strong><br style=\"color: #7ac774;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Covers 1 July 2022- 30 June 2023 (except the data received from Cleanaway which cover 27 June 2022 to 25 June 2023).</span></strong><br style=\"color: #7ac774;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Solid material diverted from landfill e.g. reused, recycled, repurposed, composted or converted to energy. Excludes all liquids, except high-strength sludges and liquids diverted for use as food.</span></strong></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Reviewed from: <a href=\"https://www.colesgroup.com.au/sustainability/?page=sustainability-report\" style=\"font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">Sustainability Report | Coles Group </a></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "301,817",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Phu_Ho+Total_Waste_Recycled_by_Coles_GRI_306_2_formerly_G4_EN23_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15607673,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Temporary Workers %",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Temporary_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Temporary Workers %",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's workers has a temporary employment contract?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Temporary Work",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Temporary_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15638698,
      "name": "Manali Rana+Code of conduct includes harassment, discrimination or workplace violence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Manali_Rana+Code_of_conduct_includes_harassment_discrimination_or_workplace_violence.json",
      "designer": "Manali Rana",
      "title": "Code of conduct includes harassment, discrimination or workplace violence",
      "question": "Does the company’s Code of Conduct covers harassment, discrimination or workplace violence?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>A company code of conduct is a set of rules which is commonly written for employees of a company, which protects the business and informs the employees of the company's expectations. Source: [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_conduct|Wikipedia]]</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p> </p>\r\n<p>For this metric question, you are being asked to identify whether the organization's code of conduct encompasses provisions on harassment, discrimination or workplace violence.</p>\r\n<p>Use publicly available reports such as Annual Report, CSR report or code of conduct document.</p>\r\n<p>In order to answer \"Yes\" to this question, the company must explicitly state the inclusion of harassment, discrimination or workplace violence clause in the code of conduct. If yes, please select as many as apply.</p>\r\n<p>Unknown is only a correct answer where a company's Code of Conduct is not found. Otherwise, select 'Yes' or 'No' accordingly.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - Own Operations",
        "Yes - Supply Chain",
        "Yes - Portfolio Companies",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 23,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 23,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Manali_Rana+Code_of_conduct_includes_harassment_discrimination_or_workplace_violence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15638718,
      "name": "Manali Rana+Disability-Inclusive communications in reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Manali_Rana+Disability_Inclusive_communications_in_reporting.json",
      "designer": "Manali Rana",
      "title": "Disability-Inclusive communications in reporting",
      "question": "Does the company communicate its efforts to promote the inclusion of persons with disabilities in mainstream reporting processes, e.g. CSR, sustainability, human rights?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Persons with disabilities include those who have long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairments which in interaction with various barriers may hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others.<br>Source: [[https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/article-1-purpose.html|UN]]</p>\r\n<p><br>Businesses can contribute to disability inclusion not only through their actions but also through transparent reporting.<br>Inclusive and accessible communications benefit everyone, both persons with disabilities and the public. By practicing disability-inclusive communications, we can reflect the true diversity of our societies. [[https://www.globalreporting.org/news/news-center/new-guidance-for-disability-reporting/|GRI]].</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>For this metric question you are being asked to identify whether the organization has communicated its efforts to promote the inclusion of persons with disabilities in mainstream reporting processes, e.g. related to corporate social responsibility, sustainability, human rights.</p>\r\n<p><br>Use publicly available reports such as Annual Report, CSR report, Sustainability report or Human Rights Statement.</p>\r\n<p><br>In order to answer \"Yes\" to this question, the company must explicitly state the inclusion of their commitment to respecting and promoting the rights of people with disabilities. Also, what steps have they taken in this direction?</p>\r\n<p><br>If the business indicates it is developing or planing to disclose communication related to disability in the future, select \"In development\".</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "In Development"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Disability Inclusion",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 22,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 22,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Manali_Rana+Disability_Inclusive_communications_in_reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15638731,
      "name": "Manali Rana+Discrimination and Harassment Training",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Manali_Rana+Discrimination_and_Harassment_Training.json",
      "designer": "Manali Rana",
      "title": "Discrimination and Harassment Training",
      "question": "Does the company provide training specifically to address discrimination and harassment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p> </p>\r\n<p>Training is important for raising awareness on the issues of discrimination and harassment. It helps people identify what is considered appropriate behavior in the workplace and how to address it if they notice them.</p>\r\n<p><br>Training can be targeted at entire employees or employees in managerial positions.</p>\r\n<p><br>The training can be in any form, but should explicitly address discrimination and harassment.<span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\"><br></span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p> </p>\r\n<p>For this metric question, you are being asked to identify whether the organization's employees and/or managers have undertaken any training specifically to address issues of discrimination and harassment during the reporting period.</p>\r\n<p><br>This training can take place as a standalone course on discrimination and harassment, be part of the code of conduct, or be embedded in human rights. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports.</p>\r\n<p><br>Select:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Employees (all). Every employee in the company is receiving training.</li>\r\n<li>Managers. The leadership or management of the company receive training.</li>\r\n<li>In Development. The business indicates it is developing a training programme, or plans to implement one in the future.</li>\r\n<li>No. No training on discrimination and harassment is described.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<h6>Keywords and search terms for this metric.</h6>\r\n<p><strong>- Training</strong><br><strong>- Education</strong></p>\r\n<h6><br>Answers &amp; Calculations</h6>\r\n<p><br>Once you have found the answer, select the applicable answer.</p>\r\n<p><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - all employees",
        "Yes - managers only",
        "Training provided - not specified to who",
        "In development",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 21,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Manali_Rana+Discrimination_and_Harassment_Training+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15638746,
      "name": "Manali Rana+Harassment and Violence Prevention Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Manali_Rana+Harassment_and_Violence_Prevention_Policy.json",
      "designer": "Manali Rana",
      "title": "Harassment and Violence Prevention Policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy for preventing harassment and violence?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p> </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\">This metric emphasizes on a company's policy that defines its commitment to a workplace free of violence and harassment, provide an overview of the responsibilities of all employees and outlines the procedures for reporting and investigating workplace violence and harassment.<br></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\">Harassment and Violence includes --<br>(a) the term “violence and harassment” in the world of work refers to a range of unacceptable behaviours and practices, or threats thereof, whether a single occurrence or repeated, that aim at, result in, or are likely to result in physical, psychological, sexual or economic harm, and includes gender-based violence and harassment;<br>(b) the term “gender-based violence and harassment” means violence and harassment directed at persons because of their sex or gender, or affecting persons of a particular sex or gender disproportionately, and includes sexual harassment.<br>Source :[[https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C190|ILO]]</span></span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is looking for clear policies that include reporting and investigation procedures to prevent workplace violence and harassment.</p>\r\n<p>To answer the metric, start by searching publicly available documents like Annual, CSR and company's code of conduct.</p>\r\n<h6>Keywords and search terms for this metric</h6>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Anti-harassment</li>\r\n<li>Violence</li>\r\n<li>Harassment</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<h6>Answers &amp; Calculations</h6>\r\n<p>Once you have found the answer, mark ‘Yes’ otherwise ‘No’. <br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - own operations",
        "Yes - supply chain",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 21,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Manali_Rana+Harassment_and_Violence_Prevention_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15638758,
      "name": "Manali Rana+Non-Discrimination policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Manali_Rana+Non_Discrimination_policy.json",
      "designer": "Manali Rana",
      "title": "Non-Discrimination policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy on discrimination for their own operations or supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric emphasizes on a company's policy that defines its efforts toward creating a safe and inclusive workplace by prohibiting discrimination based on protected characteristics. It details the behaviors considered discriminatory and the actions taken against such behaviors to ensure fairness and equality for all employees.</p>\r\n<p><br>Discrimination includes--<br>(a) any distinction, exclusion or preference made on the basis of race, colour, sex, religion, political opinion, national extraction or social origin, which has the effect of nullifying or impairing equality of opportunity or treatment in employment or occupation;<br>(b) such other distinction, exclusion or preference which has the effect of nullifying or impairing equality of opportunity or treatment in employment or occupation as may be determined by the Member concerned after consultation with representative employers' and workers' organisations, where such exist, and with other appropriate bodies.<br>Source: [[https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_Ilo_Code:C111|ILO]]<br>Harassment is a specific form of discrimination. Because harassment raises unique issues, some organizations have separate policies for harassment and for other forms of discrimination.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is looking for a clear-cut policies that make it clear that harassment and discrimination will not be tolerated, and set standards and expectations for behaviour.<br>To answer the metric, start by searching publicly available documents like Annual, CSR and company's code of conduct.</p>\r\n<h6><br>Keywords and search terms for this metric</h6>\r\n<p>- Anti-discrimination<br>- Anti-harassment<br>- Discrimination<br>- Harassment</p>\r\n<h6><br>Answers &amp; Calculations</h6>\r\n<p><br>Once you have found the answer, mark ‘Yes’ otherwise ‘No’.</p>\r\n<p><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - own operations",
        "Yes - supply chain",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 21,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Manali_Rana+Non_Discrimination_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15638771,
      "name": "Manali Rana+ESG training for top leadership positions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Manali_Rana+ESG_training_for_top_leadership_positions.json",
      "designer": "Manali Rana",
      "title": "ESG training for top leadership positions",
      "question": "Does the company provide training on ESG to Top Leadership positions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\">Companies face opportunities and threats from emerging environmental, social and governance issues. As a board member, it is important to stay informed and updated to ensure effective oversight over strategy and risk, as well as manage the company's ability to meet rapidly evolving investor, market and regulatory expectations. </span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\"><br>Although the fundamental duties of directors have not changed, the board is now expected to monitor the company's key ESG risks and opportunities, as well as its overall strategy to measure, integrate and manage these matters. These issues have taken a strong hold on companies of all sizes, in all industries and in all markets, meaning boards must align ESG with broader business strategy and cannot afford to be careless. </span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\"><br>This metric falls within the </span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal;\">social</span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\"> section of questions, which covers how companies and company boards of directors are taking a multipronged approach at re-skilling and upskilling board members to meet the demand of building and bringing in-house ESG expertise. </span></span><a href=\"https://www.pwc.com/us/en/services/governance-insights-center/library/assets/pwc-gic-acds-2023.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">[[https://www.pwc.com/us/en/services/governance-insights-center/library/assets/pwc-gic-acds-2023.pdf|Source. ]]</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\">For this metric question you are being asked to identify the training that the organization's board or C-suit employees have undertaken on ESG during the reporting period. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual, CSR and Corporate governance reports. </span></span></p>\r\n<h6><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\"><br></span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric</span></span></h6>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\">- Education<br>- Training<br>- Upskilling<br>- Development</span></span></p>\r\n<h6><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal;\">Answers &amp; Calculations</span></span></h6>\r\n<p><br>Once you have found the answer, mark ‘Yes’ otherwise ‘No’ or 'In Development', if the business indicates it is developing a training programme, or plans to implement one in the future.</p>\r\n<p><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field.<br><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: IBM Plex Sans,Arial; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;\"><br><br></span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "In Development"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Manali_Rana+ESG_training_for_top_leadership_positions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15696487,
      "name": "ShareAction+Voting Matters Social Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Voting_Matters_Social_Score.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Voting Matters Social Score",
      "question": "What percentage of shareholder-sponsored resolutions related to the topic of social issues did the asset manager vote in favor of?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/reports/voting-matters-2022/findings-on-social-resolutions|here]].</p>\r\n<p>In this 2022 edition of ShareAction’s Voting Matters report, it is revealed how 68 of the world’s largest asset managers voted on 252 shareholder resolutions designed to address current environmental and social crises. It examines voting performance on environmental and social issues, and how it differs from our findings in 2021. For the first time, it analyses shareholder-filed governance resolutions that directly relate to environmental and social issues, grouped together as Pay and Politics resolutions.</p>\r\n<p>ShareAction's annual Voting Matters publication forms part of it's campaign to hold asset managers to account and empower their clients. It is intended to be used alongside ShareAction's research on voting accountability and the asset management industry, including our Voting Expectations publication, list of Resolutions to Watch and ShareAction's biannual Global Asset Management Benchmark.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This score shows how many shareholder-sponsored resolutions each manager voted ‘for’, as a percentage of the total number of resolutions the manager was able to vote on. Asset managers were therefore not penalized for not having holdings in companies.</p>\r\n<p>ShareAction gave all asset managers the opportunity to verify the data and, of the 68 asset managers, 60 returned verified datasets to us. The eight asset managers who chose not to verify the data were: American Century Investments, Coronation Fund Managers, Morgan Stanley Investment Management, Nuveen Asset Management, PGGM Investments, State Street Global Advisors, Veritas Asset Management and Vontobel Asset Management.</p>\r\n<p>The full methodology can be found [[https://shareaction.org/reports/voting-matters-2022/methods|here]]</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Voting_Matters_Social_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15698007,
      "name": "ShareAction+Voting Matters Environmental Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Voting_Matters_Environmental_Score.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Voting Matters Environmental Score",
      "question": "What percentage of shareholder-sponsored resolutions related to the topic of the environment did the asset manager vote in favor of?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/reports/voting-matters-2022/findings-on-environmental-resolutions|here]].</p>\r\n<p>In this 2022 edition of ShareAction’s Voting Matters report, it is revealed how 68 of the world’s largest asset managers voted on 252 shareholder resolutions designed to address current environmental and social crises. It examines voting performance on environmental and social issues, and how it differs from our findings in 2021. For the first time, it analyses shareholder-filed governance resolutions that directly relate to environmental and social issues, grouped together as Pay and Politics resolutions.</p>\r\n<p>ShareAction's annual Voting Matters publication forms part of it's campaign to hold asset managers to account and empower their clients. It is intended to be used alongside ShareAction's research on voting accountability and the asset management industry, including our Voting Expectations publication, list of Resolutions to Watch and ShareAction's biannual Global Asset Management Benchmark.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This score shows how many shareholder-sponsored resolutions each manager voted ‘for’, as a percentage of the total number of resolutions the manager was able to vote on. Asset managers were therefore not penalized for not having holdings in companies.</p>\r\n<p>ShareAction gave all asset managers the opportunity to verify the data and, of the 68 asset managers, 60 returned verified datasets to us. The eight asset managers who chose not to verify the data were: American Century Investments, Coronation Fund Managers, Morgan Stanley Investment Management, Nuveen Asset Management, PGGM Investments, State Street Global Advisors, Veritas Asset Management and Vontobel Asset Management.</p>\r\n<p>The full methodology can be found [[https://shareaction.org/reports/voting-matters-2022/methods|here]]</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Voting_Matters_Environmental_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15699264,
      "name": "ShareAction+Voting Matters Pay and Politics Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Voting_Matters_Pay_and_Politics_Score.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Voting Matters Pay and Politics Score",
      "question": "What percentage of shareholder-sponsored resolutions related to the topics of pay and politics did the asset manager vote in favor of?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/reports/voting-matters-2022/findings-on-pay-and-politics-resolutions|here]].</p>\r\n<p>In this 2022 edition of ShareAction’s Voting Matters report, it is revealed how 68 of the world’s largest asset managers voted on 252 shareholder resolutions designed to address current environmental and social crises. It examines voting performance on environmental and social issues, and how it differs from our findings in 2021. For the first time, it analyses shareholder-filed governance resolutions that directly relate to environmental and social issues, grouped together as Pay and Politics resolutions.</p>\r\n<p>ShareAction's annual Voting Matters publication forms part of it's campaign to hold asset managers to account and empower their clients. It is intended to be used alongside ShareAction's research on voting accountability and the asset management industry, including our Voting Expectations publication, list of Resolutions to Watch and ShareAction's biannual Global Asset Management Benchmark.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This score shows how many shareholder-sponsored resolutions each manager voted ‘for’, as a percentage of the total number of resolutions the manager was able to vote on. Asset managers were therefore not penalized for not having holdings in companies.</p>\r\n<p>ShareAction gave all asset managers the opportunity to verify the data and, of the 68 asset managers, 60 returned verified datasets to us. The eight asset managers who chose not to verify the data were: American Century Investments, Coronation Fund Managers, Morgan Stanley Investment Management, Nuveen Asset Management, PGGM Investments, State Street Global Advisors, Veritas Asset Management and Vontobel Asset Management.</p>\r\n<p>The full methodology can be found [[https://shareaction.org/reports/voting-matters-2022/methods|here]]</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Voting_Matters_Pay_and_Politics_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15850813,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Collaborations and Memberships",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Collaborations_and_Memberships.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Collaborations and Memberships",
      "question": "Does the company mention membership in, or partnership with, multi-stakeholder initiatives that address modern slavery issues?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Industry and non-industry initiatives represent valuable opportunities for garment companies to learn from experts and peers. It also helps to lift the industry standard for preventing, identifying, and mitigating modern slavery, labour exploitation, and human trafficking risks, and facilitates effective remediation. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">This metric assesses whether the company discloses in its modern slavery statement that it collaborates with industry and non-industry stakeholders to learn from experts and peers to prevent, identify, and mitigate modern slavery, labour exploitation and human trafficking risks, and enable effective remedy for harms caused or contributed to.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The statement must mention that the company engages or collaborates with this stakeholder or initiative in some way. The metric is not met if the statement mentions the initiative or stakeholder but no relationship is clearly established.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">If the company discloses that it collaborates with industry and non-industry initiatives or stakeholders, please indicate “Yes”, and provide details.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">If no collaboration exists or is described in the statement, please select \"No\".</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Relevant industry and non-industry stakeholders and initiatives can include (but are not limited to):</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Mekong Club</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">Corporate sustainability reporting coalition</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA)</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">UN Global Compact</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"text-align: justify; text-indent: -18pt; font-size: 1rem; color: #000000;\">The Coalition to End Forced Labour in the Uyghur Region</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"text-align: justify; text-indent: -18pt; font-size: 1rem; color: #000000;\">Amfori</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem; color: #000000;\">For minerals/electronics/renewable energy </span><span style=\"caret-color: #000000; color: #000000; font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">(non-exhaustive list)</span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #000000; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Responsible Business Alliance (RBA)</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #000000; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Solar Stewardship Initiative</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #000000; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA)</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #000000; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM)</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #000000; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Australasian Convenience and Petroleum Marketers Association (ACAPMA)</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #000000; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Minerals Council of Australia</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">For the financial sector (</span><span style=\"caret-color: #000000; color: #000000; font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">non-exhaustive list)</span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Finance Against Slavery and Trafficking (FAST) initiative</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">UN Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI)</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Investors Against Slavery and Trafficking (IAST- APAC) initiative</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">ShareAction</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">CCLA \"Find it, Fix it, Prevent it\" initiative</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">For the apparel sector </span><span style=\"color: #000000;\">(</span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align); caret-color: #000000; color: #000000;\">non-exhaustive list)</span><span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem; color: #000000;\">The Better Cotton Initiative,</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"text-align: justify; text-indent: -18pt; font-size: 1rem; color: #000000;\">Sustainable Apparel Coalition</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem; color: #000000;\">Fair Wear Foundation,</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem; color: #000000;\">Partnership for Sustainable Textiles,</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 1rem; color: #000000;\">Sustainable Fibre Alliance</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Statement for FY2018/19 ending in April 2019 = 2018</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Statement for FY2018/19 ending in May 2019 (or later) = 201</span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1138,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 14,
      "companies": 512,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Considers_MS_Risks_in_Investments_sector_specific.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Collaborations_and_Memberships+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15850841,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA COVID-19 Response",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_COVID_19_Response.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA COVID-19 Response",
      "question": "Does the company mention that it provides any type of support to suppliers and/or supply chain workers as the result of the COVID-19 pandemic?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"caret-color: #000000; color: #000000; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; white-space: pre-wrap;\">In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, there were reports of increases in forms of modern slavery related to the energy sector. We’re looking for evidence that companies were more proactive in their approach to the pandemic and addressed the specific impacts of what may have increased vulnerability of supply chain workers to modern slavery.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; line-height: 1.38; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">To meet this metric, companies must disclose what action they took to respond to the risks of modern slavery</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-weight: bold; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"> among supply chain workers</span> <span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-weight: bold; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">. This can include </span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-weight: bold; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">engaging with suppliers</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"> and/or </span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-weight: bold; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">working directly with supply chain workers</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 12pt; line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Examples of the types of action companies may disclose, include: </span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Paying suppliers for completed work and extending orders over time</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Avoiding varying contracts unreasonably or seeking discounts from suppliers</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Asking suppliers for information on steps they have taken to protect workers from COVID-19, including provision of protective equipment, providing sick leave, and increasing cleaning in factories</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Asking suppliers whether new or changed orders will require them to take on additional workers or require additional overtime from current workers</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Adjusting due diligence and remediation processes linked to evolving supply chains and changing workforce structures, e.g. ensuring workers still have access to a grievance mechanism</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Collaborating with suppliers to inform and educate workers about modern slavery risks linked to COVID-19</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Redeploying workers to mitigate impact of workforce reductions</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Supporting the safe return of migrant workers</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; line-height: 1.38; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">If the company discloses that it did take any of the above action to respond to modern slavery risks as a result of COVID-19, please indicate </span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-weight: bold; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">“Yes”</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">, and provide details.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; line-height: 1.38; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">If no action exists or is described in the statement, please select</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-weight: bold; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"> “No”</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; line-height: 1.38; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #ff0000; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; line-height: 1.38; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 12pt; line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Statement for FY2018/19 ending in </span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-weight: bold; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">April</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"> 2019 = 2018</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Statement for FY2018/19 ending in </span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-weight: bold; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">May</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\"> 2019 (or later) = 2019</span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 330,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 199,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_COVID_19_Response+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15850854,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA State-imposed forced labour",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_State_imposed_forced_labour.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA State-imposed forced labour",
      "question": "Does the company explicitly state restricting or excluding suppliers working in or sourcing from regions where the state is involved in the exploitation of workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"text-align: justify;\">When state-imposed forced labour occurs, it becomes impossible for brands to conduct third-party audits or due diligence to verify the absence of forced labour, prevent or mitigate forced labour, or remediate forced labour. In these instances, the UN Guiding Principles allows for withdrawal from relationships with suppliers.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To meet this metric, companies must disclose that it has restricted, stopped or avoided sourcing of raw materials, production, or manufacturing from regions where the state is involved in the exploitation of workers.</p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This metric goes beyond identifying these areas as high risk to actively controlling for this high risk and recognising that meaningful engagement is limited where the state is directly involved in the exploitation of workers.</p>\r\n<p>Regions where there has been evidence of state-imposed forced labour include (but are not limited to): </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"text-align: justify; text-indent: -18pt; font-size: 1rem;\">Xinjiang, China, </span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"text-align: justify; text-indent: -18pt; font-size: 1rem;\">Uzbekistan</span></li>\r\n<li><span style=\"text-align: justify; text-indent: -18pt; font-size: 1rem;\">Turkmenistan.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>This disclosure must be separate to any disclosure related to impact of COVID-19. </p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: normal;\">If the company discloses that it has restricted/ stopped/ avoided sourcing, producing or manufacturing in any of these regions, please indicate “Yes”, and provide details.</p>\r\n<p>If no action exists or is described in the statement, please select \"No\".</p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">If yes, in your comment please add the relevant section of the statement, including details on: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-indent: -18pt; font-size: 1rem;\">whether the company explicitly state this absence, restriction, or avoidance of sourcing from high-risk regions is a response to calls from multi-stakeholder initiatives, such as, The Coalition to End Forced Labour in the Uyghur Region, The Better Cotton Initiative or Clean Clothes Campaign</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-indent: -18pt; font-size: 1rem;\">if the company mentions requiring certifications for suppliers at any level of the supply chain: raw materials, textiles and manufacturing, such as Global Organic Textile Standard, Global Recycled Standard, YESS standard for Spinners.</span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</span></p>\r\n<p>Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p>When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in April 2019 = 2018</li>\r\n<li>Statement for FY2018/19 ending in May 2019 (or later) = 2019</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 402,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 288,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_State_imposed_forced_labour+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 15928634,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Workers Engagement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Workers_Engagement.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Workers Engagement",
      "question": "Does the company engage with workers or trade unions in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Beyond providing avenues for raising grievances, for example through a whistleblowing mechanism, companies should be providing avenues for worker voice and worker representation throughout its supply chain.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To meet this metric, the company must disclose that it has engaged in dialogue with supply chain workers or with groups representing supply chain workers.</p>\r\n<p>The engagement can be part of the risk assessment, management or remediation process. Engaging in dialogue can mean one or more of the following:</p>\r\n<p>- through worker interviews, mobile surveys, or workshops with workers</p>\r\n<p>- engaging with labour unions or workers representaives</p>\r\n<p>If the company discloses that it has engaged in dialogue with supply chain workers, please indicate “Yes, with supply chain workers”, and provide details.</p>\r\n<p>If the company discloses that it has engaged in dialogue with supply chain workers representatives or labour unions, please indicate “Yes, with labour unions”, and provide details.</p>\r\n<p>If no action exists or is described in the statement, please select \"No\". If yes, in your comment please add the relevant section of the statement, including what form of engagement the company discloses.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes with workers",
        "Yes with labor unions",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 535,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 14,
      "companies": 381,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Workers_Engagement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16089676,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Forced overtime",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Forced_overtime.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Forced overtime",
      "question": "Does the statement identifies excessive overtime as a risk or indicator of forced labour, including forced or involuntary overtime?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>According to the ILO, forced overtime \"occurs if overtime exceeds the weekly or monthly limits allowed by law and is made compulsory by threats of a penalty, irrespective of the reasons for such overtime\". It is a form of forced labour and is present in electronics supply chains. Dismissal, poor reviews, or wages below the legal minimum are examples of threats or penalties used to make overtime compulsory.</p>\r\n<p>In this context, the ILO identifies excessive overtime as an indicator of forced overtime. With this metric, we are trying to understadn whether companies are aware of the risk in their supply chains.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To meet this metric, companies must state that they have identified <strong>excessive overtime as a risk</strong> or indicator of forced labour in their supply chain. They do not need to explain how they address the issue, but if they do, please include the relevant paragraphs in your comment.</p>\r\n<p>If the company explicitely identifies (excessive) overtime as a risk, select \"Yes\". </p>\r\n<p>If it does not explicitely identify (<span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">excessive) overtime as a risk, select \"No\".</span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">If the company reports incidents associated with forced overtime, but does not state that forced overtime is a risk in their supply chain, please select \"No\". There is a metric that captures reports of incidents, where you can add information about incidents and violations. </span></p>\r\n<p>Keywords: overtime, working hours, excessive, working week, 60 hours, RBA, involuntary overtime, forced overtime, compulsory overtime</p>\r\n<p>{{+Example for a \"Yes\" in Forced Overtime|view: closed }}</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 113,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 109,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Forced_overtime+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16091083,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Purchasing Practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Purchasing_Practices.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Purchasing Practices",
      "question": "Does the Statement describe efforts to ensure responsible purchasing practices?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Purchasing practices refer to the ways companies interact with suppliers: the demands they place on them (e.g. price, deadlines, order volumes) and how those demands are negotiated. Research has showed that certain purchasing practices increase the risks of forced labour. For example, if a buyer increases the volume of an order at short notice, this can force suppliers to rely on forced overtime work to meet the buyer's requirements.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>With this metric, we want to understand whether companies take actions to improve their purchasing practices. Companies might show that they ensure responsible purchasing practices in the following ways (non-exhaustive list):</p>\r\n<p>- mention a \"two way\" supplier code of conduct or shared responsibility contracting</p>\r\n<p>- mention of avoiding the following practices (irresponsible or unfair trading practices): cancelling and delaying orders; refusing to pay for orders; demanding retrospective discounts; issuing sudden changes in order volumes; and paying for orders very late</p>\r\n<p>- mention of the following practices: consulting suppliers on deadlines, prompt payment, taking into account cost of labour and living/fair wages fin price negotiations, considerations for the impact of contract requirements on suppliers and workers</p>\r\n<p>- company-wide communications about responsible purchasing practices</p>\r\n<p>- analysis on the impact of sustainable purchasing practices on business relevant outcomes</p>\r\n<p>- explicitely linking purchasing practices and increased risks of violations</p>\r\n<p>- membership in Better Buying https://betterbuying.org/download/bbpi-report-2023/</p>\r\n<p>Please note that statements might refer to \"responsible purchasing practices\" to make general statements about their engagement strategy with suppliers. It does not automatically mean that they meet the criteria for this metric. Companies should explain what they are doing to ensure responsible purchasing practices. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "In development"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 113,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 109,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Purchasing_Practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16091284,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Artisanal and Small Scale Mining",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Artisanal_and_Small_Scale_Mining.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Artisanal and Small Scale Mining",
      "question": "Does the company disclose any considerations, actions or due diligence measures it takes with regard to its engagement with artisanal and small-scale mining operations in its mineral supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) is considered to be a high risk environment for forced labour. However, small scale operations, when legitimate and legal, can benefit miners by enabling them to keep the wealth created through mining in the local community. It is important for companies to adopt procedures that address the risks linked to ASM while empowering local communities.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Read the statement to identify whether the company discloses any <strong>actions, procedures or policies in relation to Artisanal and Small Scale Mining</strong>. This could include special training, due diligence processes, engagement with mining communities.</p>\r\n<p>Identifying Artisanal and Small Scale Mining as a risk in the supply chain is not sufficient to meet this metric.</p>\r\n<p>To meet this metric, the statement must state special measures taken when engaging with small scale and artisanal mining operations. <strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">General comments regarding responsible mining policies are not sufficient. </span></strong></p>\r\n<p>In your comment, please provide details about the measure, action or policy.</p>\r\n<p>{{+Example - Value \"Yes\" ASM|view: closed }}</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "In development"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 132,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 128,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Artisanal_and_Small_Scale_Mining+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16091889,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Agency workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Agency_workers.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Agency workers",
      "question": "Does the company take actions to minimise the risk of modern slavery among contract/agency workers throughout the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Research has shown that agency, contract or temporary workers are particularly vulnerable to forced labour, since they do not benefit from the protections granted to other workers. Companies or suppliers might hire temporary workers through agencies that are engaged in forced labour.</p>\r\n<p>Agency or contract workers might also be referred to as \"contingent workers\".</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial; font-size: 13px; white-space-collapse: preserve;\"> </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Read the statement and identify whether the company discloses any actions they are taking to minimise the risk of modern slavery among contract/agency workers throughout the supply chain.</p>\r\n<p>Policies that simply state protecting the rights of agency, contract or temporary workers do not count as actions for this metric. To meet this metric, companies must show that they have put in place specific processes.</p>\r\n<p>Actions might include (but are not limited to):</p>\r\n<p>- Conduct additional assessments in areas/suppliers that pose risks to migrant workers</p>\r\n<p>- Provide training for supplier or agencies</p>\r\n<p>- Monitor or publish the percentage of contract workers working for suppliers</p>\r\n<p>Select \"Yes\" if the company discloses actions to protect migrant workers.</p>\r\n<p>Select \"No\" if you cannot find any actions. </p>\r\n<p>Select \"In development\" if the company states that it is in the process of designing such actions. </p>\r\n<p>Please provide details of the actions taken in the comment.</p>\r\n<p>Keywords: agency, temporary, contract, contingent</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "In development"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 113,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 109,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Agency_workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16092507,
      "name": "Walk Free+MSA Migrant Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Migrant_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "MSA Migrant Workers",
      "question": "Does the company take actions to minimise the risk of modern slavery among migrant workers in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Research has shown that migrant workers are particularly vulnerable to forced labour. They might be dependent on their employers for the right to stay in the country where they work; they might not know the local language and laws. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Read the statement and identify whether the company discloses, in its modern slavery statement, any actions that they are taking to minimise the risk of modern slavery among migrant workers throughout the supply chain.</p>\r\n<p>Policies specifically aimed at protecting migrant workers do not count as actions, unless they involve specific measures, processes, or risk assessments. This metric does not focus on policies (e.g. Migrant Workers Policy). It aims to capture concrete actions taken by the company itself (as opposed to placing responsibilities on the suppliers).</p>\r\n<p>Actions or measures might include:</p>\r\n<p>- Conduct additional assessments for high risk suppliers</p>\r\n<p>- Provide training for supplier or agencies</p>\r\n<p>- Monitor the percentage of migrant workers working for suppliers</p>\r\n<p>- Provide information/data on feed repayment to workers (in case workers were charged recruitment fees)</p>\r\n<p>- Tracing labour agencies used by suppliers to get an understanding of where risks lie in the recruitment supply chain</p>\r\n<p>- Mapping migrant worker corridors</p>\r\n<p>- Predeparture orientation training for migrant workers</p>\r\n<p>Select \"Yes\" if the company discloses actions to protect migrant workers.</p>\r\n<p>Select \"No\" if you cannot find any actions. </p>\r\n<p>Select \"In development\" if the company states that it is in the process of designing such actions. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "In development"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 113,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 109,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+MSA_Migrant_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097747,
      "name": "ShareAction+Human Rights Due Diligence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Human_Rights_Due_Diligence.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Human Rights Due Diligence",
      "question": "Does the company conduct ongoing human rights due diligence to identify, prevent, mitigate and account for human rights risks and adverse impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 162,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 162,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Human_Rights_Due_Diligence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097759,
      "name": "ShareAction+Responding to Human Rights Risks Across the Value Chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Responding_to_Human_Rights_Risks_Across_the_Value_Chain.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Responding to Human Rights Risks Across the Value Chain",
      "question": "Is prison labour used in the company’s value chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 133,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 133,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Responding_to_Human_Rights_Risks_Across_the_Value_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097775,
      "name": "ShareAction+Structure and Location of Direct Operations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Structure_and_Location_of_Direct_Operations.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Structure and Location of Direct Operations",
      "question": "What is the total number of employees in the company's direct operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 166,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 166,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Structure_and_Location_of_Direct_Operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097786,
      "name": "ShareAction+Contract Types Breakdown - Indefinite",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_Breakdown_Indefinite.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Contract Types Breakdown - Indefinite",
      "question": "What is the total number of direct operations employees on indefinite/permanent contracts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 119,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 119,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_Breakdown_Indefinite+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097800,
      "name": "ShareAction+Contract Types Breakdown - Temporary",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_Breakdown_Temporary.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Contract Types Breakdown - Temporary",
      "question": "What is the total number of direct operations employees on fixed-term/temporary contracts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Temporary Work",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 112,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 112,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_Breakdown_Temporary+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097811,
      "name": "ShareAction+Contract Types Breakdown - Full-time",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_Breakdown_Full_time.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Contract Types Breakdown - Full-time",
      "question": "What is the total number of direct operations employees on full-time contracts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": "",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_Breakdown_Full_time+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097822,
      "name": "ShareAction+Contract Types Breakdown - Part-time",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_Breakdown_Part_time.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Contract Types Breakdown - Part-time",
      "question": "What is the total number of direct operations employees on part-time contracts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 103,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 103,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_Breakdown_Part_time+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097838,
      "name": "ShareAction+Contract Types Breakdown - Non-guaranteed hours",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_Breakdown_Non_guaranteed_hours.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Contract Types Breakdown - Non-guaranteed hours",
      "question": "What is the total number of direct operations employees on non-guaranteed hours employees (casual workers, on-call employees, zero-hours contracts) contracts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Temporary Work",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 52,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 52,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_Breakdown_Non_guaranteed_hours+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097849,
      "name": "ShareAction+Contract Types Non-employees - Contractors",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_Non_employees_Contractors.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Contract Types Non-employees - Contractors",
      "question": "What is the total number of contractors (independent, self-employed) in the direct operations workforce?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Temporary Work",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 49,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 49,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_Non_employees_Contractors+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097864,
      "name": "ShareAction+Contract Types Non-employees - Agency workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_Non_employees_Agency_workers.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Contract Types Non-employees - Agency workers",
      "question": "What is the total number of agency workers (e.g. labour agency, recruitment agency workers) in the direct operations workforce?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Temporary Work",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 43,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 43,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_Non_employees_Agency_workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097875,
      "name": "ShareAction+Contract Types Non-employees - Franchisee workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_Non_employees_Franchisee_workers.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Contract Types Non-employees - Franchisee workers",
      "question": "What is the total number of franchisee workers in the direct operations workforce?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Temporary Work",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 29,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 29,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_Non_employees_Franchisee_workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097890,
      "name": "ShareAction+Contract Types Non-employees - Other workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_Non_employees_Other_workers.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Contract Types Non-employees - Other workers",
      "question": "What is the total number of other workers (e.g. subcontracted service workers, third-party workers) in the direct operations workforce?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Temporary Work",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 36,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 36,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_Non_employees_Other_workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097901,
      "name": "ShareAction+Contract Types contingent workers change",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_contingent_workers_change.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Contract Types contingent workers change",
      "question": "Has the proportion of workers on contingent contracts (i.e. fixed-term/temporary employees, contractors, agency workers and/or third party on site workers) increased or decreased substantively over the last reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Temporary Work",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 123,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 123,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Contract_Types_contingent_workers_change+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097916,
      "name": "ShareAction+Monitoring Diversity and Inclusion - Other Data Collection",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Monitoring_Diversity_and_Inclusion_Other_Data_Collection.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Monitoring Diversity and Inclusion - Other Data Collection",
      "question": "Does the company collect any other categories of diversity data, if any?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Sexual orientation",
        "Gender identity",
        "Disability",
        "Religion and belief",
        "Other"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 139,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 139,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Monitoring_Diversity_and_Inclusion_Other_Data_Collection+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097928,
      "name": "ShareAction+Discrimination and Harassment Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Discrimination_and_Harassment_Policy.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Discrimination and Harassment Policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a public policy on discrimination and harassment, or similar?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 163,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 163,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Discrimination_and_Harassment_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097945,
      "name": "ShareAction+Discrimination and Harassment Incidents Reported",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Discrimination_and_Harassment_Incidents_Reported.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Discrimination and Harassment Incidents Reported",
      "question": "What is the number of discrimination and harassment incidents reported during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 107,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 107,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Reported_Incidents_of_Discrimination.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Discrimination_and_Harassment_Incidents_Reported+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097956,
      "name": "ShareAction+Discrimination and Harassment Incidents Resolved",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Discrimination_and_Harassment_Incidents_Resolved.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Discrimination and Harassment Incidents Resolved",
      "question": "What is the number of discrimination and harassment incidents resolved during the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 95,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 95,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Discrimination_and_Harassment_Incidents_Resolved+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097971,
      "name": "ShareAction+Wage Levels - Living Wage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Wage_Levels_Living_Wage.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Wage Levels - Living Wage",
      "question": "To what extent does the company pay its employees a living wage or above?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not in any direct operations",
        "1 location only",
        "More than 1 location",
        "All global operations"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 131,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 131,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Wage_Levels_Living_Wage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097983,
      "name": "ShareAction+Tracking Training and Development Hours - Female",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Tracking_Training_and_Development_Hours_Female.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Tracking Training and Development Hours - Female",
      "question": "What is the average number of hours of training provided to female employees (on an FTE basis)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 106,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Tracking_Training_and_Development_Hours_Female+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16097997,
      "name": "ShareAction+Tracking Training and Development Hours - Male",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Tracking_Training_and_Development_Hours_Male.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Tracking Training and Development Hours - Male",
      "question": "What is the average number of hours of training provided to male employees (on an FTE basis)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 106,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Tracking_Training_and_Development_Hours_Male+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098008,
      "name": "ShareAction+Tracking Training and Development Hours - Indefinite Contract",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Tracking_Training_and_Development_Hours_Indefinite_Contract.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Tracking Training and Development Hours - Indefinite Contract",
      "question": "What is the average number of hours of training provided to employees on an indefinite/permanent contract (on an FTE basis)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Tracking_Training_and_Development_Hours_Indefinite_Contract+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098022,
      "name": "ShareAction+Tracking Training and Development Hours - Temporary Contract",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Tracking_Training_and_Development_Hours_Temporary_Contract.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Tracking Training and Development Hours - Temporary Contract",
      "question": "What is the average number of hours of training provided to employees on a fixed-term/temporary contract (on an FTE basis)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Temporary Work",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 79,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 79,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Tracking_Training_and_Development_Hours_Temporary_Contract+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098037,
      "name": "ShareAction+Occupational Health and Safety- Consulting with Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Occupational_Health_and_Safety_Consulting_with_Workers.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Occupational Health and Safety- Consulting with Workers",
      "question": "Does the company consult with workers and/or worker representative bodies when developing and evaluating health and safety policies and practices?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 152,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 152,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Occupational_Health_and_Safety_Consulting_with_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098049,
      "name": "ShareAction+Occupational Health and Safety- Employee Injury and Illness",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Occupational_Health_and_Safety_Employee_Injury_and_Illness.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Occupational Health and Safety- Employee Injury and Illness",
      "question": "What is the total number of recordable work-related injuries or ill health (excluding fatalities) for employees since the last reporting period in the company's most significant operating locations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].. It was calculated by totaling the number of injuries and illnesses at all the significant locations listed.<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 167,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 167,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Occupational_Health_and_Safety_Employee_Injury_and_Illness+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098060,
      "name": "ShareAction+Occupational Health and Safety- Employee Fatalities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Occupational_Health_and_Safety_Employee_Fatalities.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Occupational Health and Safety- Employee Fatalities",
      "question": "What is the total number of fatalities for employees as a result of a work-related injury since the last reporting period in the company's most significant operating locations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]]. It was calculated by totaling the number of fatalities at all the significant locations listed.<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 168,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 168,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Employee_Deaths.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Occupational_Health_and_Safety_Employee_Fatalities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098076,
      "name": "ShareAction+Occupational Health and Safety- Non-Employee Injury and Illness",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Occupational_Health_and_Safety_Non_Employee_Injury_and_Illness.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Occupational Health and Safety- Non-Employee Injury and Illness",
      "question": "What is the total number of recordable work-related injuries or ill health (excluding fatalities) for non-employee direct operations workers since the last reporting period in the company's most significant operating locations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]]. It was calculated by totaling the number of injuries and illnesses at all the significant locations listed.<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 168,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 168,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Occupational_Health_and_Safety_Non_Employee_Injury_and_Illness+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098087,
      "name": "ShareAction+Occupational Health and Safety- Non-Employee Fatalities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Occupational_Health_and_Safety_Non_Employee_Fatalities.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Occupational Health and Safety- Non-Employee Fatalities",
      "question": "What is the total number of fatalities for non-employee direct operations workers as a result of a work-related injury since the last reporting period in the company's most significant operating locations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]]. It was calculated by totaling the number of fatalities at all the significant locations listed.<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Emergency Preparedness",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 168,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 168,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Occupational_Health_and_Safety_Non_Employee_Fatalities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098098,
      "name": "ShareAction+Mental Health Risks and Safeguarding Monitoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Mental_Health_Risks_and_Safeguarding_Monitoring.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Mental Health Risks and Safeguarding Monitoring",
      "question": "Does the company monitor and report on employee mental health and well-being, such as sick days due to mental health?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mental Health Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 146,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 146,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Mental_Health_Risks_and_Safeguarding_Monitoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098113,
      "name": "ShareAction+Integrated Mental Health Risks and Safeguarding",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Integrated_Mental_Health_Risks_and_Safeguarding.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Integrated Mental Health Risks and Safeguarding",
      "question": "Does the company integrate mental health safeguarding into job design and workplace conditions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mental Health Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 147,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 147,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Integrated_Mental_Health_Risks_and_Safeguarding+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098125,
      "name": "ShareAction+Worker Wellbeing",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Worker_Wellbeing.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Worker Wellbeing",
      "question": "Does the company offer a health and well-being programme?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Mental Health Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 155,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 155,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Worker_Wellbeing+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098140,
      "name": "ShareAction+Freedom of association and collective bargaining",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Freedom of association and collective bargaining",
      "question": "What is the percentage (%) of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements for all locations in the direct operations",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": "",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 134,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 134,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098152,
      "name": "ShareAction+Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining Risks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Freedom_of_Association_and_Collective_Bargaining_Risks.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining Risks",
      "question": "Has the company identified any risks or restrictions to employees' right to freedom of association or collective bargaining in any of its direct operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 126,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 126,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Freedom_of_Association_and_Collective_Bargaining_Risks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098164,
      "name": "ShareAction+Grievance Mechanisms for Non-Employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Grievance_Mechanisms_for_Non_Employees.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanisms for Non-Employees",
      "question": "Are channel(s)/mechanism(s) through which employees can raise complaints or concerns accessible to the company’s non-employee direct operations workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 149,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 149,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Grievance_Mechanisms_for_Non_Employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098176,
      "name": "ShareAction+Assessing Grievance Mechanisms Against UNGPBHR",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Assessing_Grievance_Mechanisms_Against_UNGPBHR.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Assessing Grievance Mechanisms Against UNGPBHR",
      "question": "Does the company assess the effectiveness of its grievance mechanism(s) against the criteria in Principle 31 of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (that is, whether the mechanism(s) is legitimate, accessible, predictable, equitable, transparent, and compatible with human rights)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 137,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 137,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Assessing_Grievance_Mechanisms_Against_UNGPBHR+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098192,
      "name": "ShareAction+Grievance Mechanisms - Grievances reported",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Grievance_Mechanisms_Grievances_reported.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanisms - Grievances reported",
      "question": "What is the number of grievances relating to human rights and/or workers’ rights reported in the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 112,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 112,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Grievance_Mechanisms_Grievances_reported+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098203,
      "name": "ShareAction+Grievance Mechanisms - Grievances Resolved",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Grievance_Mechanisms_Grievances_Resolved.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanisms - Grievances Resolved",
      "question": "What is the number of grievances relating to human rights and/or workers’ rights resolved in the reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 94,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 94,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Grievance_Mechanisms_Grievances_Resolved+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098217,
      "name": "ShareAction+Supply Chain Structure and Location",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Supply_Chain_Structure_and_Location.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Supply Chain Structure and Location",
      "question": "Does the company publicly disclose the results of its supply chain mapping?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 132,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 132,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Supply_Chain_Structure_and_Location+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098229,
      "name": "ShareAction+First-Tier Supply Chain Numbers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+First_Tier_Supply_Chain_Numbers.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "First-Tier Supply Chain Numbers",
      "question": "What is the estimated number of workers in the company's first-tier supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": "",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 86,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 86,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+First_Tier_Supply_Chain_Numbers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098239,
      "name": "ShareAction+Supply Chain Gender Composition Numbers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Supply_Chain_Gender_Composition_Numbers.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Supply Chain Gender Composition Numbers",
      "question": "Does the company collect data on the gender composition of its supply chain workforce?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 131,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 131,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Supply_Chain_Gender_Composition_Numbers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098256,
      "name": "ShareAction+Sourcing Strategy Assessment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Sourcing_Strategy_Assessment.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Sourcing Strategy Assessment",
      "question": "Does the company assess supplier performance against its own human rights commitments, as applicable, as part of the process for selecting new suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 154,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 154,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Sourcing_Strategy_Assessment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098268,
      "name": "ShareAction+Sourcing Strategy Assessment Standards",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Sourcing_Strategy_Assessment_Standards.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Sourcing Strategy Assessment Standards",
      "question": "Does the company require suppliers to respect a minimum set of labour standards of workers’ rights in a supplier code of conduct, or similar?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 160,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 160,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Sourcing_Strategy_Assessment_Standards+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098282,
      "name": "ShareAction+Monitoring Suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Monitoring_Suppliers.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Monitoring Suppliers",
      "question": "Do the company’s responsible sourcing policies and practices apply to third party labour providers (labour agencies, logistics, cleaning, security, etc.)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 156,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 156,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Monitoring_Suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098296,
      "name": "ShareAction+Workers' Rights in the Supply Chain Monitoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Workers_Rights_in_the_Supply_Chain_Monitoring.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Workers' Rights in the Supply Chain Monitoring",
      "question": "Does the company monitor whether supply chain workers have access to a grievance mechanism?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 136,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 136,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Workers_Rights_in_the_Supply_Chain_Monitoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16098308,
      "name": "ShareAction+Violations of Workers' Rights in the Supply Chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Violations_of_Workers_Rights_in_the_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Violations of Workers' Rights in the Supply Chain",
      "question": "Has the company identified any instances of forced labour, modern slavery and human trafficking in its supply chain in this reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 130,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 130,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Violations_of_Workers_Rights_in_the_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16137132,
      "name": "ShareAction+Governance Structure and Management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Governance_Structure_and_Management.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Governance Structure and Management",
      "question": "Which workforce-related topics are subject to Board level oversight (Board members and committees), if any? Select all that apply.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Attracting and retaining workers",
        "Diversity and Inclusion",
        "Forced labour and modern slavery and Human trafficking",
        "Gender pay equity",
        "Grievance and whistle blowing processes",
        "Human Resources",
        "Human rights",
        "Mental health in the workplace",
        "Occupational health and safety",
        "Responsible sourcing",
        "Training and development",
        "Wage levels / living wages",
        "Worker engagement",
        "Other"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 165,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 165,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Governance_Structure_and_Management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16137151,
      "name": "ShareAction+Human Rights Policy Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Human_Rights_Policy_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Human Rights Policy Commitment",
      "question": "Which public commitments on human rights has the company made?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "A commitment to respect all internationally recognised human rights that is approved at Board level",
        "A commitment to prohibiting and identifying and preventing forced labour and modern slavery and human trafficking in its operations and supply chains",
        "A commitment to provide a remedy where it has caused or contributed to adverse human rights impacts affecting/linked to its business operations and relationships"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 158,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 158,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Human_Rights_Policy_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16137165,
      "name": "ShareAction+Direct Operations Parental Leave",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Direct_Operations_Parental_Leave.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Direct Operations Parental Leave",
      "question": "Does the company have a shared parental leave policy that exceeds the statutory minimum requirements?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "",
      "methodology": "",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Parental Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 155,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 155,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Direct_Operations_Parental_Leave+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16137189,
      "name": "ShareAction+Response to COVID-19",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Response_to_COVID_19.json",
      "designer": "ShareAction",
      "title": "Response to COVID-19",
      "question": "Which workers are covered by measures the company has in place to ensure that workers who are unwell due to COVID-19 take sick leave, and other necessary leave, and are protected economically if they need to do so?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by ShareAction, more information can be found [[https://shareaction.org/investor-initiatives/workforce-disclosure-initiative|here]].<br><br>The Workforce Disclosure Initiative (WDI) aims to improve corporate transparency and accountability on workforce issues, provide companies and investors with comprehensive and comparable data and help increase the provision of good jobs worldwide.<br><br>Designed with the input of investors, companies, trade unions and subject matter experts, the WDI survey has been designed to gather information on the issues most crucial to decent work and human rights in the workplace. The WDI survey is aligned with other reporting frameworks including DJSI, GRI, the UNGPs and the SDGs, and offers a comprehensive and comparable reporting system.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies are asked to disclose the information using an online platform during the disclosure period. After the disclosing period ends, companies will receive a Disclosure Score and a Disclosure Scorecard – only viewable to your company, the WDI signatories and WDI partners – which evaluate a response based on the level of completeness and provide a basic benchmark to peer groups of responding companies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Indefinite/Permanent employees",
        "Fixed-term/temporary employees",
        "Non-guaranteed hours employees (e.g. casual workers/on-call employees/zero-hours contracts/on-call employees)",
        "Contractors (e.g. independent/self-employed)",
        "Agency workers (e.g. labour agency/recruitment agency workers)",
        "Franchisee workers",
        "Third-party on site workers  (e.g. subcontracted service workers/third-party contract workers)"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 143,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 143,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ShareAction+Response_to_COVID_19+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16563121,
      "name": "Manali Rana+Scope 2 emissions - Market based",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Manali_Rana+Scope_2_emissions_Market_based.json",
      "designer": "Manali Rana",
      "title": "Scope 2 emissions - Market based",
      "question": "How many Scope 2 indirect emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) does this company report using the market-based methodology?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Scope 2 is an indirect emission category that includes GHG emissions from the generation of purchased or acquired electricity, steam, heat, or cooling consumed by the reporting company. Calculating scope 2 emissions requires a method of determining the emissions associated with electricity consumption.</p>\r\n<p>Primarily, two methods have been used by companies, programs, and policymakers to “allocate” the GHG emissions created by electricity generation to the end consumers of a given grid. Consumer GHG accounting in scope 2 completes this allocation process through emission factors applied to each unit of energy consumption.</p>\r\n<p>This guidance terms these methods the (a) location-based and (b) market-based methods.</p>\r\n<p><strong>In short, the market-based method reflects emissions from electricity that companies have purposefully chosen (or their lack of choice), while the location-based method reflects the average emissions' intensity of grids on which energy consumption occurs.</strong></p>\r\n<p><strong> </strong>Source: <a href=\"https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/2023-03/Scope%202%20Guidance.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">GHG</a></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this metric question, you need to identify the value of Indirect GHG emissions (Scope 2), which has been calculated using <strong>Market - based method,</strong> of the organization for a specific year.</p>\r\n<p>Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. Keywords and search terms for this metric:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>GHG</li>\r\n<li>Emissions</li>\r\n<li>Scope 2</li>\r\n<li>Market based</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><br><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations:</strong> Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If any calculations or unit conversions are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the page number where you found the answer. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.<br><br><strong>Units</strong>: Companies may report their GHG emissions in hundreds, thousands or millions of metric tonnes. Make sure you check the unit of measurement and enter the full number into the answer field.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Tip: Most of the companies disclose their methodology by marking an asterisk or superscript. </strong></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Metric tons of CO2 equivalent",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Manali_Rana+Scope_2_emissions_Market_based+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16564905,
      "name": "Manali Rana+Scope 2 emissions - Location based",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Manali_Rana+Scope_2_emissions_Location_based.json",
      "designer": "Manali Rana",
      "title": "Scope 2 emissions - Location based",
      "question": "How many Scope 2 indirect emissions (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent) does this company report using the location-based methodology?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<div>\r\n<div>The location-based and market-based methodologies are two ways to report scope 2 emissions.</div>\r\n<div> </div>\r\n</div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div><strong>The location-based method reflects the average emissions' intensity of grids where energy consumption occurs. </strong></div>\r\n<div> </div>\r\n<div>This method quantifies scope 2 GHG emissions based on average energy generation emission factors for defined geographic locations, including local, subnational, or national boundaries.</div>\r\n</div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div> </div>\r\n<div>On the other hand, the market-based method takes into account the specific green energy contracts a company may have.</div>\r\n<div> </div>\r\n</div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>Companies are advised to report scope 2 emissions using both methods, and use the higher of the two values for aggregate emission reporting and target setting.</div>\r\n</div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>This approach encourages energy efficiency and renewable energy procurement</div>\r\n</div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>However, some companies only prominently display the market-based method, which is usually the lower of the two.</div>\r\n<div> </div>\r\n<div>Sources: Corporate<a href=\"https://newclimate.org/sites/default/files/2022-06/CorporateClimateResponsibilityMonitor2022.pdf#page=98\" target=\"_blank\"> Climate Responsibility Monitor 2022</a> &amp; <a href=\"https://newclimate.org/sites/default/files/2023-02/NewClimate_CorporateClimateResponsibilityMonitor2023_Feb23.pdf#page=21\" target=\"_blank\">Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor 2023</a></div>\r\n</div>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To answer this metric question you need identify the value of Indirect GHG emissions (Scope 2), which has been calculated using Market - based method, of the organization for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. Keywords and search terms for this metric:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>GHG</li>\r\n<li>Emissions</li>\r\n<li>Scope 2</li>\r\n<li>Location based</li>\r\n<li>Market based</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><br><strong>Answers &amp; Calculations:</strong> Once you have found the answer, make sure the unit of measurement fits to the question on Wikirate. If any calculations or unit conversions are done, include these in the Comments field alongside the page number where you found the answer. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.<br><br><strong>Units:</strong> Companies may report their GHG emissions in hundreds, thousands or millions of metric tonnes. Make sure you check the unit of measurement and enter the full number into the answer field.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Tip: Most of the companies disclose their methodology by marking an asterisk or superscript. </strong></p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Metric tons of CO2 equivalent",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Manali_Rana+Scope_2_emissions_Location_based+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 16568951,
      "name": "Vincent Manier+Types of purchased energy tracked (Scope 2 emissions)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Vincent_Manier+Types_of_purchased_energy_tracked_Scope_2_emissions.json",
      "designer": "Vincent Manier",
      "title": "Types of purchased energy tracked (Scope 2 emissions)",
      "question": "What types of purchased energy does the company report as sources of indirect emissions (Scope 2)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial; font-style: normal;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial; font-style: normal;\">Scope 2 includes emissions from all purchased/acquired and consumed electricity, heat, steam, or cooling. Companies can identify these energy uses on the basis of utility bills or metered energy consumption at facilities within the inventory boundary.<br>Source: </span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial; font-style: normal; text-decoration: underline; -webkit-text-decoration-skip: none; text-decoration-skip-ink: none; color: #1155cc;\"><a href=\"https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/2023-03/Scope%202%20Guidance.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">GHG</a></span></span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial; font-style: normal;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial; font-style: normal;\">To answer this metric question you need identify the various sources from which the company has purchased electricity for a specific year. Start by searching publicly available documents like Annual and CSR reports. <br><br></span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal;\">Keywords and search terms for this metric:</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial; font-style: normal;\"> <br><br>GHG<br>Emissions<br>Scope 2<br>Sources<br>Electricity<br>Steam<br>Heating<br>Cooling</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial; font-style: normal;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial; font-style: normal;\">Thermal </span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial; font-style: normal;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal;\">Answers &amp; Calculations:</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial; font-style: normal;\"> Once you have found the answer, select the applicable answer.<br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field below. Select the 'Unknown' answer box if the company has not published the data.</span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "A. Electricity",
        "B. Steam",
        "C. Heating",
        "D. Cooling"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Vincent_Manier+Types_of_purchased_energy_tracked_Scope_2_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18021839,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.1.S1 Commitment to respect human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_1_S1_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.1.S1 Commitment to respect human rights",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect human rights OR a publicly available policy statement committing it to the rights under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) OR a publicly available policy statement committing it to the International Bill of Human Rights?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.1.S1 Commitment to respect human rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_1_S1_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_1_S1_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18021851,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.1.S2 Commitment to respect human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_1_S2_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.1.S2 Commitment to respect human rights",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement that also commits it to respecting: the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) OR a publicly available policy statement also commits it to respecting: the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.1.S2 Commitment to respect human rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_1_S2_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_1_S2_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18021866,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.2.a.S1 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights\nat Work",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_S1_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.2.a.S1 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights\nat Work",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work  AND does the company’s policy statement include explicit commitments to respect: freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining and the rights not to be subject to forced labour, child labour or discrimination in respect of employment and occupation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commitment to ILO core principles",
        "Explicitly lists all four ILO core principles",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.2.a.S1 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights\nat Work+Vasiliki Gkatziaki"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_S1_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_S1_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18021878,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.2.a.S2 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights\nat Work",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_S2_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.2.a.S2 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights\nat Work",
      "question": "Does the company’s publicly available policy statement also expect its suppliers/extractive business partners to commit to respecting the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work AND the company’s publicly available policy statement explicitly lists them in that commitment.?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Expects suppliers to commit to ILO core principles",
        "Explicitly lists all four ILO core principles for suppliers",
        "Expects BPs/JVs to commit to ILO core principles",
        "Explicitly lists all four ILO core principles for BPs/JVs",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.2.a.S2 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights\nat Work+Vasiliki Gkatziaki"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_S2_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_S2_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_S2_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18021890,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.2.b.S1 Health and safety and working hours",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_b_S1_Health_and_safety_and_working_hours.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.2.b.S1 Health and safety and working hours",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect the health and safety of workers AND does the company commit to respecting the ILO conventions on labour standards on working hours or does the company publicly state that workers shall not be required to work more than 48 hours in a regular work week or 60 hours including overtime and that all overtime work must be consensual and paid at a premium rate? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commitment to respect H&S of workers",
        "Commitment to ILO working hours standards or 48-hour regular work week",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.2.b.S1 Health and safety and working hours+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_b_S1_Health_and_safety_and_working_hours+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_b_S1_Health_and_safety_and_working_hours+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18021902,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.2.b.S2 Health and safety and working hours",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_b_S2_Health_and_safety_and_working_hours.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.2.b.S2 Health and safety and working hours",
      "question": "Does the company’s publicly available policy statement also expect its suppliers/extractive business partners to commit to respecting the health and safety of their workers AND does the company’s publicly available policy statement also expect its suppliers/extractive business partners to commit to the ILO conventions on labour standards on working hours or does the company has a public expectation that its extractive business partners shall not require workers to work more than 48 hours in a regular work week or 60 hours including overtime and that all overtime work must be consensual and be paid at a premium rate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Expects suppliers to commit to H&S of workers",
        "Expects suppliers to commit to ILO working hours standards or 48 hour regular work week",
        "Expects BPs/JVs to commit to H&S of workers",
        "Expects BPs/JVs to commit to ILO working hours standards or 48 hour regular work week",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.2.b.S2 Health and safety and working hours+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_b_S2_Health_and_safety_and_working_hours+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_b_S2_Health_and_safety_and_working_hours+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18021914,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AG.a.S1  Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_a_S1_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.AG.a.S1  Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect ownership/use of land and natural resources and respect legitimate tenure rights related to the ownership and use of land and natural resources as set out in the relevant part(s) of the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (VGGT) OR does the company has a publicly available policy statement committing it to the IFC Performance Standards AND does the company has a publicly available policy statement committing it to respecting indigenous peoples’ rights or references the relevant part(s) of the ILO Convention on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples No.169 or of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples AND does the company’s policy statement(s) also expect(s) its suppliers to make these commitments?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commitment to respect land ownership/natural resources as in VGGT OR Commitment to respect land ownership/natural resources as in IFC Performance Standards",
        "Commitment to respect indigenous rights or ILO No.169 or UN Declaration",
        "Expects suppliers to make these commitments",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_a_S1_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_a_S1_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18021926,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AG.a.S2  Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_a_S2_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.AG.a.S2  Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights",
      "question": "Does the company’s publicly available policy statement committing it to respecting ownership/use of land and natural resources also include a commitment to obtain free prior and informed consent (FPIC) from indigenous peoples and local communities for transaction(s) involving land and natural resources or to a zero tolerance for land grabbing AND does the company commits to respecting the right to water AND does the company’s policy statement(s) also expects its suppliers make these commitments?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commitment to obtain FPIC or zero tolerance to land grabbing",
        "Commitment to respect the right to water",
        "Expects suppliers to make these commitments",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_a_S2_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_a_S2_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18021938,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AG.b.S1 Vulnerable groups",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_b_S1_Vulnerable_groups.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.AG.b.S1 Vulnerable groups",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect: women’s rights OR does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect: children’s rights OR does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect: migrant workers’ rights AND, in addition to at least one of the above does the company’s policy statement(s) also expect(s) its suppliers to make these commitments? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commitment to women's rights OR Commitment to children's rights OR Commitment to migrant worker's rights",
        "Expects suppliers to respect at least one of these rights",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AG.b.S1 Vulnerable groups+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_b_S1_Vulnerable_groups+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_b_S1_Vulnerable_groups+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18021950,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AG.b.S2 Vulnerable groups",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_b_S2_Vulnerable_groups.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.AG.b.S2 Vulnerable groups",
      "question": "Does the company’s publicly available policy statement committing it to respect women’s rights also refer to the relevant part(s) of the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) or of the Women’s Empowerment Principles (WEP) OR does the company’s publicly available policy statement committing it to respect children’s rights also refers to the relevant part(s) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child or of the Children’s Rights and Business Principles OR does the company’s publicly available policy statement committing it to respect migrant workers’ rights also refers to the relevant part(s) of the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families AND does the company’s policy statement(s) also expect(s) its suppliers to make these commitments?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commitment refers to CEDAW/Women's Empowerment Principles OR Commitment refers to Child Rights Convention/Business Principles OR Commitment refers to Convention on migrant workers",
        "Expects suppliers to respect these rights",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AG.b.S2 Vulnerable groups+Vasiliki Gkatziaki"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_b_S2_Vulnerable_groups+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_b_S2_Vulnerable_groups+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18021962,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AP.S1 Vulnerable groups",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AP_S1_Vulnerable_groups.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.AP.S1 Vulnerable groups",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect: women’s rights OR does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect: children’s rights OR does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect: migrant workers’ rights AND, in addition to at least one of the above does the company’s policy statement(s) also expect(s) its suppliers to make these commitments?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commitment to women's rights OR Commitment to children's rights OR Commitment to migrant worker's rights",
        "Expects suppliers to respect these rights",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AP.S1 Vulnerable groups+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AP_S1_Vulnerable_groups+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AP_S1_Vulnerable_groups+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18021974,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AP.S2 Vulnerable groups",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AP_S2_Vulnerable_groups.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.AP.S2 Vulnerable groups",
      "question": "Does the company’s publicly available policy statement committing it to respect women’s rights also refer to the relevant part(s) of the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women or of the Women’s Empowerment Principles OR does the company’s publicly available policy statement commit it to respect children’s rights also refers to the relevant part(s) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child or of the Children’s Rights and Business Principles OR does the company’s publicly available policy statement commit it to respect migrant workers’ rights also refers to the relevant part(s) of the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families AND does the company’s policy statement(s) also expect its suppliers to make these commitments? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commitment refers to CEDAW/Women's Empowerment Principles OR Commitment refers to Child Rights Convention/Business Principles OR Commitment refers to Convention on migrant workers",
        "Expects suppliers to respect these rights",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AP.S2 Vulnerable groups+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AP_S2_Vulnerable_groups+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AP_S2_Vulnerable_groups+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18021989,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.EX.a.S1 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_a_S1_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.EX.a.S1 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect the ownership/use of land and natural resources and respect legitimate tenure rights related to the ownership and use of land and natural resources as set out in the relevant part(s) of the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (VGGT) OR does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to the IFC Performance Standards AND does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect indigenous peoples’ rights or references the relevant part(s) of the ILO Convention on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples No.169 or of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples AND does the company’s policy statement(s) also expect(s) its suppliers to make these commitments? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commitment to respect land ownership/natural resources as in VGGT OR Commitment to respect land ownership/natural resources as in IFC Performance Standards",
        "Commitment to respect indigenous rights or ILO No.169 or UN Declaration",
        "Expects EX BPs to make these commitments",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_a_S1_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_a_S1_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022001,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.EX.a.S2 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_a_S2_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.EX.a.S2 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights",
      "question": "Does the company’s publicly available policy statement committing it to respecting ownership/use of land and natural resources also include a commitment to obtain free prior and informed consent (FPIC) from indigenous peoples and local communities for transaction(s) involving land and natural resources or to a zero tolerance for land grabbing AND does the company commit to respecting the right to water AND does the company’s policy statement(s) also expect its extractive business partners to make these commitments? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commitment to obtain FPIC or zero tolerance to land grabbing",
        "Commitment to respect the right to water",
        "Expects EX BPs to make these commitments",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_a_S2_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_a_S2_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022013,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.EX.b.S1 Security",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_b_S1_Security.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.EX.b.S1 Security",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) OR does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to only using security providers who are members of the International Code of Conduct of Private Security Providers Association (ICoCA) AND does the company commit to respecting international humanitarian law (IHL)? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commitment to Voluntary Principles on Security and HRs OR Uses only ICoCA members as security providers",
        "Commits to International Humanitarian Law",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.EX.b.S1 Security+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_b_S1_Security+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_b_S1_Security+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022028,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.EX.b.S2 Security",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_b_S2_Security.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.EX.b.S2 Security",
      "question": "Does the company expect its extractive business partners to make these commitments?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.EX.b.S2 Security+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_b_S2_Security+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_b_S2_Security+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022040,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.ICT.a.S1 Responsible sourcing of minerals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_a_S1_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.ICT.a.S1 Responsible sourcing of minerals",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to the responsible sourcing of minerals AND does the company commit to following the OECD Guidance at least in respect of 3TG AND does the company require its suppliers to follow the company’s responsible sourcing policy, or does the company require its suppliers to follow the OECD Guidance? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commitment to responsible mineral sourcing",
        "Commitment to following OECD Guidance on 3GT",
        "Requires suppliers to commit to responsible mineral sourcing",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_a_S1_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_a_S1_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022052,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.ICT.a.S2 Responsible sourcing of minerals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_a_S2_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.ICT.a.S2 Responsible sourcing of minerals",
      "question": "Does the company’s responsible sourcing policy statement to follow the OECD Guidance explicitly cover all minerals AND does the company expect its suppliers to include a similar requirement for their suppliers? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commitment to OECD Guidance covers all minerals",
        "Expects suppliers to make similar requirements of their suppliers",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.ICT.a.S2 Responsible sourcing of minerals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_a_S2_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_a_S2_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022064,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.ICT.b.S1 Vulnerable groups",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_b_S1_Vulnerable_groups.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.ICT.b.S1 Vulnerable groups",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect: women’s rights OR does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect: children’s rights OR does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect: migrant workers’ rights AND, in addition to at least one of the above does the company’s policy statement(s) also expect(s) its suppliers to make these commitments? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commitment to women's rights OR Commitment to children's rights OR Commitment to migrant worker's rights",
        "Expects suppliers to respect at least one of these rights",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.ICT.b.S1 Vulnerable groups+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_b_S1_Vulnerable_groups+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_b_S1_Vulnerable_groups+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022079,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.ICT.b.S2 Vulnerable groups",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_b_S2_Vulnerable_groups.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.ICT.b.S2 Vulnerable groups",
      "question": "Does the company’s publicly available policy statement committing it to respect women’s rights also refer to the relevant part(s) of the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women or of the Women’s Empowerment Principles OR does the company’s publicly available policy statement committing it to respect children’s rights also refer to the relevant part(s) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child or of the Children’s Rights and Business Principles OR does the company’s publicly available policy statement committing it to respect migrant workers’ rights also refers to the relevant part(s) of the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families AND does the company’s policy statement(s) also expect(s) its suppliers to make these commitments? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commitment refers to CEDAW/Women's Empowerment Principles OR Commitment refers to Child Rights Convention/Business Principles OR Commitment refers to Convention on migrant workers",
        "Expects suppliers to respect these rights",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.ICT.b.S2 Vulnerable groups+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_b_S2_Vulnerable_groups+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_b_S2_Vulnerable_groups+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022091,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.4.S1 Commitment to remedy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_4_S1_Commitment_to_remedy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.4.S1 Commitment to remedy",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to remedy the adverse impacts on individuals and workers and communities that it has caused or contributed to AND does the company expect its suppliers/extractive business partners to make this commitment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commitment to remedy adverse HRs impacts",
        "Expects suppliers to make this commitment",
        "Expects EX BPs to make this commitments",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.4.S1 Commitment to remedy+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_4_S1_Commitment_to_remedy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_4_S1_Commitment_to_remedy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022106,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.4.S2 Commitment to remedy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_4_S2_Commitment_to_remedy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.4.S2 Commitment to remedy",
      "question": "Does the company’s publicly available policy statement also commit it to collaborate with judicial or non-judicial mechanisms to provide access to remedy AND the policy statement include a commitment to work with suppliers/extractive business partners to remedy adverse impacts that are directly linked to the company’s operations, products or services?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commitment to collaborate with judicial or non-judicial mechanisms",
        "Commitment to work with suppliers on remedy",
        "Commitment to work with EX BPs on remedy",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.4.S2 Commitment to remedy+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_4_S2_Commitment_to_remedy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_4_S2_Commitment_to_remedy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022118,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.5.S1 Commitment to respect the rights of human rights defenders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_5_S1_Commitment_to_respect_the_rights_of_human_rights_defenders.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.5.S1 Commitment to respect the rights of human rights defenders",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to neither tolerate nor contribute to threats, intimidation and attacks (both physical and legal) against human rights defenders AND does the company expect its suppliers/extractive business partners to make this commitment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Zero tolerance of threats/attacks on HRDs",
        "Expects suppliers to make this commitment",
        "Expects BPs to make this commitment",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.5.S1 Commitment to respect the rights of human rights defenders+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_5_S1_Commitment_to_respect_the_rights_of_human_rights_defenders+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_5_S1_Commitment_to_respect_the_rights_of_human_rights_defenders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022130,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.5.S2 Commitment to respect the rights of human rights defenders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_5_S2_Commitment_to_respect_the_rights_of_human_rights_defenders.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.5.S2 Commitment to respect the rights of human rights defenders",
      "question": "Does the company also commit to working with human rights defenders to create safe and enabling environments for civic engagement and human rights at local, national or international levels? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPolicy commitments<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  (UNGPs) expect?<br>\n  <br>\nA policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels  of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting  human rights and communicates this internally and externally.  <br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> The term “statement” is used to describe a wide range of forms a  company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments,  and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or  human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions  within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as  a company code, business principles, etc. </em><br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n <br>\nA policy commitment sets the “tone at the top” of the company  that is needed to continually drive respect for human rights into  the core values and culture of the business. It indicates that top  management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum  standard for conducting business with legitimacy; it sets out their",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nResearch note on commitment language  <br>\n<br>\nBecause of this, whenever a CHRB indicator requires a policy commitment, the CHRB researchers will look for an explicit commitment or any form of promise that companies will uphold the specific rights, instruments and/or standards listed in the indicator description. This means that language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.5.S2 Commitment to respect the rights of human rights defenders+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_5_S2_Commitment_to_respect_the_rights_of_human_rights_defenders+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_5_S2_Commitment_to_respect_the_rights_of_human_rights_defenders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022142,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.1.S1 Commitment from the top",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_1_S1_Commitment_from_the_top.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.1.S1 Commitment from the top",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that a board member or board committee is tasked with specific governance oversight of respect for human rights AND does the company describe the human rights expertise of the board member or board committee tasked with that governance oversight? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nBoard Level Accountability <br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe development and implementation of a company’s approach to human rights should be guided from the top of the business, which for larger companies is the Board. Companies need to strive for coherence between their responsibility to respect human rights and policies and procedures that govern their wider business activities and relationships. This should include, for example, policies and procedures that set financial and other performance incentives for personnel, procurement practices or lobbying activities where human rights are at stake. A Board committee is often the best placed to ensure such coordination. <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nSignals from and attention to human rights issues by the Board indicates that top management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum standard for conducting business with legitimacy.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Board level responsibility for HRs",
        "Describes HRs expertise of Board member",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.1.S1 Commitment from the top+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_1_S1_Commitment_from_the_top+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_1_S1_Commitment_from_the_top+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022154,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.1.S2 Commitment from the top",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_1_S2_Commitment_from_the_top.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.1.S2 Commitment from the top",
      "question": "Do Board members or the CEO clearly signal the company’s commitment to human rights (eg, speeches, presentations or other communications) by discussing why human rights matter to the business or any challenges to respecting human rights encountered by the business?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nBoard Level Accountability <br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe development and implementation of a company’s approach to human rights should be guided from the top of the business, which for larger companies is the Board. Companies need to strive for coherence between their responsibility to respect human rights and policies and procedures that govern their wider business activities and relationships. This should include, for example, policies and procedures that set financial and other performance incentives for personnel, procurement practices or lobbying activities where human rights are at stake. A Board committee is often the best placed to ensure such coordination. <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nSignals from and attention to human rights issues by the Board indicates that top management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum standard for conducting business with legitimacy.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.1.S2 Commitment from the top+Vasiliki Gkatziaki"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_1_S2_Commitment_from_the_top+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_1_S2_Commitment_from_the_top+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022166,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.2.S1 Board responsibility",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_2_S1_Board_responsibility.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.2.S1 Board responsibility",
      "question": "Does the company describe the processes it has in place to discuss and regularly review its human rights strategy or policy or management processes at the board level or a board committee OR does the company provide an example of specific human rights issues or trends in types of human rights issues discussed at the board level or a board committee during the company’s last reporting period? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br><br><br>Board Level Accountability <br><br>What do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect? <br><br>The development and implementation of a company’s approach to human rights should be guided from the top of the business, which for larger companies is the Board. Companies need to strive for coherence between their responsibility to respect human rights and policies and procedures that govern their wider business activities and relationships. This should include, for example, policies and procedures that set financial and other performance incentives for personnel, procurement practices or lobbying activities where human rights are at stake. A Board committee is often the best placed to ensure such coordination. <br><br>Why is this important? <br><br>Signals from and attention to human rights issues by the Board indicates that top management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum standard for conducting business with legitimacy.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br><br>Scoring:<br><br>Most CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.2.S1 Board responsibility+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_2_S1_Board_responsibility+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_2_S1_Board_responsibility+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022178,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.2.S2 Board responsibility",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_2_S2_Board_responsibility.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.2.S2 Board responsibility",
      "question": "Does the company meet both of the requirements under Score 1 AND does the company describe how the experiences of affected stakeholders or external human rights experts informed these discussions? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nBoard Level Accountability <br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe development and implementation of a company’s approach to human rights should be guided from the top of the business, which for larger companies is the Board. Companies need to strive for coherence between their responsibility to respect human rights and policies and procedures that govern their wider business activities and relationships. This should include, for example, policies and procedures that set financial and other performance incentives for personnel, procurement practices or lobbying activities where human rights are at stake. A Board committee is often the best placed to ensure such coordination. <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nSignals from and attention to human rights issues by the Board indicates that top management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum standard for conducting business with legitimacy.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Meets both requirements under score 1",
        "Describes how affected stakeholders / HRs experts inform board discussions",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.2.S2 Board responsibility+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_2_S2_Board_responsibility+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_2_S2_Board_responsibility+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022190,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.3.S1 Incentives and performance management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_3_S1_Incentives_and_performance_management.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.3.S1 Incentives and performance management",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that at least one board member has an incentive or performance management scheme linked to the company’s human rights policy commitment(s) or strategy?\n\nAND IF the company links its scheme to only one aspect of its human rights policy commitment(s) then this aspect must be one of the key sector risks the company considers salient IF that one aspect is health and safety, then it must include the health and safety of local communities or workers in the supply chain.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nBoard Level Accountability <br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe development and implementation of a company’s approach to human rights should be guided from the top of the business, which for larger companies is the Board. Companies need to strive for coherence between their responsibility to respect human rights and policies and procedures that govern their wider business activities and relationships. This should include, for example, policies and procedures that set financial and other performance incentives for personnel, procurement practices or lobbying activities where human rights are at stake. A Board committee is often the best placed to ensure such coordination. <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nSignals from and attention to human rights issues by the Board indicates that top management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum standard for conducting business with legitimacy.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "At least one board member incentive linked to HRs commitments",
        "Incentive scheme linked to key HRs risks beyond employee H&S",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.3.S1 Incentives and performance management+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_3_S1_Incentives_and_performance_management+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_3_S1_Incentives_and_performance_management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022202,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.3.S2 Incentives and performance management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_3_S2_Incentives_and_performance_management.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.3.S2 Incentives and performance management",
      "question": "Is the criteria linking board remuneration to human rights performance also made public  AND does the company indicate that it has reviewed other board performance incentives to ensure coherence with its human rights policy commitment(s)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nBoard Level Accountability <br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe development and implementation of a company’s approach to human rights should be guided from the top of the business, which for larger companies is the Board. Companies need to strive for coherence between their responsibility to respect human rights and policies and procedures that govern their wider business activities and relationships. This should include, for example, policies and procedures that set financial and other performance incentives for personnel, procurement practices or lobbying activities where human rights are at stake. A Board committee is often the best placed to ensure such coordination. <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nSignals from and attention to human rights issues by the Board indicates that top management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum standard for conducting business with legitimacy.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Performance criteria linked to HRs made public",
        "Review of other board incentives for coherence with HRs policies",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.3.S2 Incentives and performance management+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_3_S2_Incentives_and_performance_management+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_3_S2_Incentives_and_performance_management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022214,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.4.S1 Business model strategy and risks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_4_S1_Business_model_strategy_and_risks.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.4.S1 Business model strategy and risks",
      "question": "Does the company describe the process(es) it has in place to discuss and review its business model and strategy for inherent risks to human rights at the board level or a board committee OR does the company describe the frequency of and triggers for reviewing its business model or strategy and potential impacts on human rights? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br><br><br>Board Level Accountability <br><br>What do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect? <br><br>The development and implementation of a company’s approach to human rights should be guided from the top of the business, which for larger companies is the Board. Companies need to strive for coherence between their responsibility to respect human rights and policies and procedures that govern their wider business activities and relationships. This should include, for example, policies and procedures that set financial and other performance incentives for personnel, procurement practices or lobbying activities where human rights are at stake. A Board committee is often the best placed to ensure such coordination. <br><br>Why is this important? <br><br>Signals from and attention to human rights issues by the Board indicates that top management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum standard for conducting business with legitimacy.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br><br>Scoring:<br><br>Most CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.4.S1 Business model strategy and risks+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_4_S1_Business_model_strategy_and_risks+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_4_S1_Business_model_strategy_and_risks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022225,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.4.S2 Business model strategy and risks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_4_S2_Business_model_strategy_and_risks.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.4.S2 Business model strategy and risks",
      "question": "Does the company meet both requirements under Score 1 AND does the company provide an example of action(s) decided as a result of these discussions? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nBoard Level Accountability <br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe development and implementation of a company’s approach to human rights should be guided from the top of the business, which for larger companies is the Board. Companies need to strive for coherence between their responsibility to respect human rights and policies and procedures that govern their wider business activities and relationships. This should include, for example, policies and procedures that set financial and other performance incentives for personnel, procurement practices or lobbying activities where human rights are at stake. A Board committee is often the best placed to ensure such coordination. <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nSignals from and attention to human rights issues by the Board indicates that top management considers respect for human rights to be a minimum standard for conducting business with legitimacy.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Meets both requirements under score 1",
        "Example of actions resulting from reviews",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.4.S2 Business model strategy and risks+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_4_S2_Business_model_strategy_and_risks+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_4_S2_Business_model_strategy_and_risks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022236,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.1.S1 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights\nfunctions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_S1_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.1.S1 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights\nfunctions",
      "question": "Does the company indicate the senior manager role(s) accountable for implementation and decision-making on human rights issues within the company?\n\nNote: In order to get a score of 1, the company needs to meet the ILO requirement for own operations under indicator A.1.2.a (ie, the company has a publicly available statement of policy committing it to respect the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work and explicitly lists them in that commitment)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nEmbedding respect for human rights in company  culture and management systems<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe company’s statement(s) of commitment should be publicly  available in prominent locations and communicated actively to  workers, business relationships and others, including investors and  stakeholders, so that they are aware of the company’s commitments  and integrate the commitments into company culture. <br>\nThe company should align the policies and procedures that govern  its wider business activities and relationships with its responsibility  to respect human rights.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nThese steps of embedding policy commitments into company  culture and broader management systems and reinforcing them  with specific due diligence processes ensures that a company takes  a systematic and proactive, rather than ad hoc or reactive approach,  to respecting human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Senior responsibility for HRs implementation and decision making",
        "Score of 1 on A.1.2.a",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_S1_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_S1_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022248,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.1.S2 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights\nfunctions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_S2_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.1.S2 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights\nfunctions",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it assigns responsibility for implementing its human rights policy commitment(s) for day-to-day management across relevant departments AND does the company describe how it allocates resources and expertise for the day-to-day management of relevant human rights issues within its own operations AND does the company describe how it allocates resources and expertise for the day-to-day management of relevant human rights issues within its supply chain/with extractive business partners?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nEmbedding respect for human rights in company  culture and management systems<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe company’s statement(s) of commitment should be publicly  available in prominent locations and communicated actively to  workers, business relationships and others, including investors and  stakeholders, so that they are aware of the company’s commitments  and integrate the commitments into company culture. <br>\nThe company should align the policies and procedures that govern  its wider business activities and relationships with its responsibility  to respect human rights.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nThese steps of embedding policy commitments into company  culture and broader management systems and reinforcing them  with specific due diligence processes ensures that a company takes  a systematic and proactive, rather than ad hoc or reactive approach,  to respecting human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes day-to-day responsibility for implementing HRs commitments",
        "Day-to-day resources and expertise allocation in own operations",
        "Resources and expertise allocation in supply chain",
        "Resources and expertise allocation with EX BPs",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_S2_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_S2_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022260,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.2.S1 Incentives and performance management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_2_S1_Incentives_and_performance_management.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.2.S1 Incentives and performance management",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it has an incentive or performance management scheme linked to its human rights policy commitment(s) for at least one senior manager AND does the company indicate that it covers at least one of the key sector risks that the company considers salient  IF that one risk is health and safety, then it must include the health and safety of local communities or workers in the supply chain? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nEmbedding respect for human rights in company  culture and management systems<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe company’s statement(s) of commitment should be publicly  available in prominent locations and communicated actively to  workers, business relationships and others, including investors and  stakeholders, so that they are aware of the company’s commitments  and integrate the commitments into company culture. <br>\nThe company should align the policies and procedures that govern  its wider business activities and relationships with its responsibility  to respect human rights.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nThese steps of embedding policy commitments into company  culture and broader management systems and reinforcing them  with specific due diligence processes ensures that a company takes  a systematic and proactive, rather than ad hoc or reactive approach,  to respecting human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Senior manager incentives linked to HRs commitments",
        "Incentive scheme linked to key HRs risks beyond employee H&S",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.2.S1 Incentives and performance management+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_2_S1_Incentives_and_performance_management+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_2_S1_Incentives_and_performance_management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022272,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.2.S2 Incentives and performance management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_2_S2_Incentives_and_performance_management.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.2.S2 Incentives and performance management",
      "question": "Is the criteria linking the senior manager(s)’ remuneration to the company’s human rights performance is also made public AND does the company indicate that it has reviewed other senior management performance incentives to ensure coherence with its human rights policy commitment(s)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nEmbedding respect for human rights in company  culture and management systems<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe company’s statement(s) of commitment should be publicly  available in prominent locations and communicated actively to  workers, business relationships and others, including investors and  stakeholders, so that they are aware of the company’s commitments  and integrate the commitments into company culture. <br>\nThe company should align the policies and procedures that govern  its wider business activities and relationships with its responsibility  to respect human rights.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nThese steps of embedding policy commitments into company  culture and broader management systems and reinforcing them  with specific due diligence processes ensures that a company takes  a systematic and proactive, rather than ad hoc or reactive approach,  to respecting human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Performance criteria linked to HRs made public",
        "Review of other senior management incentives for coherence with HRs policies",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.2.S2 Incentives and performance management+Vasiliki Gkatziaki"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_2_S2_Incentives_and_performance_management+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_2_S2_Incentives_and_performance_management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022284,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.3.S1 Integration with enterprise risk management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_3_S1_Integration_with_enterprise_risk_management.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.3.S1 Integration with enterprise risk management",
      "question": "Does the company describe how attention to human rights risks is integrated into its broader enterprise risk management system(s) AND does the company provide an example of this?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nEmbedding respect for human rights in company  culture and management systems<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe company’s statement(s) of commitment should be publicly  available in prominent locations and communicated actively to  workers, business relationships and others, including investors and  stakeholders, so that they are aware of the company’s commitments  and integrate the commitments into company culture. <br>\nThe company should align the policies and procedures that govern  its wider business activities and relationships with its responsibility  to respect human rights.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nThese steps of embedding policy commitments into company  culture and broader management systems and reinforcing them  with specific due diligence processes ensures that a company takes  a systematic and proactive, rather than ad hoc or reactive approach,  to respecting human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "HRs risks integrated as part of enterprise risk system",
        "Provides an example",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.3.S1 Integration with enterprise risk management+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_3_S1_Integration_with_enterprise_risk_management+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_3_S1_Integration_with_enterprise_risk_management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022296,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.3.S2 Integration with enterprise risk management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_3_S2_Integration_with_enterprise_risk_management.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.3.S2 Integration with enterprise risk management",
      "question": "Does the company also describe how it assesses the adequacy of the enterprise risk management system(s) in managing human rights during the company’s last reporting year?\n\nThe assessment was either overseen by the Board Audit Committee or conducted by an independent third party.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nEmbedding respect for human rights in company  culture and management systems<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe company’s statement(s) of commitment should be publicly  available in prominent locations and communicated actively to  workers, business relationships and others, including investors and  stakeholders, so that they are aware of the company’s commitments  and integrate the commitments into company culture. <br>\nThe company should align the policies and procedures that govern  its wider business activities and relationships with its responsibility  to respect human rights.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nThese steps of embedding policy commitments into company  culture and broader management systems and reinforcing them  with specific due diligence processes ensures that a company takes  a systematic and proactive, rather than ad hoc or reactive approach,  to respecting human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.3.S2 Integration with enterprise risk management+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_3_S2_Integration_with_enterprise_risk_management+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_3_S2_Integration_with_enterprise_risk_management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022308,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.4.a.S1 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Workers and external stakeholders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_S1_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.4.a.S1 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Workers and external stakeholders",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it communicates its policy commitment(s) to all its workers, including in local languages where necessary? \n\nNote: In order to get a score of 1, does the company needs to get a score of 1 under indicator A.1.2.a  (ie, the company has a publicly available statement of policy committing it to respecting the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work and explicitly lists them in that commitment)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nEmbedding respect for human rights in company  culture and management systems<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe company’s statement(s) of commitment should be publicly  available in prominent locations and communicated actively to  workers, business relationships and others, including investors and  stakeholders, so that they are aware of the company’s commitments  and integrate the commitments into company culture. <br>\nThe company should align the policies and procedures that govern  its wider business activities and relationships with its responsibility  to respect human rights.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nThese steps of embedding policy commitments into company  culture and broader management systems and reinforcing them  with specific due diligence processes ensures that a company takes  a systematic and proactive, rather than ad hoc or reactive approach,  to respecting human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Communicates HRs policies to all workers in own operations",
        "Score of 1 on A.1.2.a",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_S1_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_S1_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022320,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.4.a.S2 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Workers and external stakeholders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_S2_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.4.a.S2 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Workers and external stakeholders",
      "question": "Does the company also describe how it communicates its policy commitments to affected stakeholders, including local communities and other groups AND does the company provide an example of how it ensures the form and frequency of the information communicated is accessible to its intended audience?  ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nEmbedding respect for human rights in company  culture and management systems<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe company’s statement(s) of commitment should be publicly  available in prominent locations and communicated actively to  workers, business relationships and others, including investors and  stakeholders, so that they are aware of the company’s commitments  and integrate the commitments into company culture. <br>\nThe company should align the policies and procedures that govern  its wider business activities and relationships with its responsibility  to respect human rights.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nThese steps of embedding policy commitments into company  culture and broader management systems and reinforcing them  with specific due diligence processes ensures that a company takes  a systematic and proactive, rather than ad hoc or reactive approach,  to respecting human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Communicates HRs policies to stakeholders",
        "Example of how HRs policies are accessible for intended audience",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_S2_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_S2_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022332,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.4.b.S1 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Business relationships",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_b_S1_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Business_relationships.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.4.b.S1 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Business relationships",
      "question": "Does the company describe the steps it takes to communicate its human rights policy down its supply chain or extractive business partners itself OR does the company demonstrate that it requires its suppliers to do so?  \r\n\r\nNote: In order to get a score of 1, does the company needs to meet the ILO requirements for suppliers/BPs under indicator A.1.2.a Score 2  (ie, the company’s publicly available policy statement also expects its suppliers to commit to respecting the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work and explicitly lists them in that commitment)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br><br><br>Embedding respect for human rights in company culture and management systems<br><br>What do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect? <br><br>The company’s statement(s) of commitment should be publicly available in prominent locations and communicated actively to workers, business relationships and others, including investors and stakeholders, so that they are aware of the company’s commitments and integrate the commitments into company culture. <br>The company should align the policies and procedures that govern its wider business activities and relationships with its responsibility to respect human rights. <br><br>Why is this important? <br><br>These steps of embedding policy commitments into company culture and broader management systems and reinforcing them with specific due diligence processes ensures that a company takes a systematic and proactive, rather than ad hoc or reactive approach, to respecting human rights.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br><br>Scoring:<br><br>Most CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes steps to communicate HRs policies to supply chain/EX BPs OR Requires them to communicate HRs policies",
        "Meets ILO requirement for suppliers on A.1.2.a",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_b_S1_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Business_relationships_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_b_S1_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Business_relationships+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022344,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.4.b.S2 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Business relationships",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_b_S2_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Business_relationships.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.4.b.S2 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Business relationships",
      "question": "Does the company also describe how its human rights policy commitments are reflected within contractual or other binding arrangements with its suppliers AND does the company demonstrate that it requires its suppliers to cascade the contractual or other binding requirements down their supply chain/ extractive business partners to cascade the contractual or other binding requirements with their business relationships?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nEmbedding respect for human rights in company  culture and management systems<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe company’s statement(s) of commitment should be publicly  available in prominent locations and communicated actively to  workers, business relationships and others, including investors and  stakeholders, so that they are aware of the company’s commitments  and integrate the commitments into company culture. <br>\nThe company should align the policies and procedures that govern  its wider business activities and relationships with its responsibility  to respect human rights.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nThese steps of embedding policy commitments into company  culture and broader management systems and reinforcing them  with specific due diligence processes ensures that a company takes  a systematic and proactive, rather than ad hoc or reactive approach,  to respecting human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes how HRs policies are contractual/binding for suppliers",
        "Requires suppliers to cascade contractual/binding HRs policies to its suppliers",
        "Requires EX BPs to cascade contractual/binding HRs policies to their BPs",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.4.b.S2 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Business relationships+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_b_S2_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Business_relationships+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_b_S2_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Business_relationships+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022356,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.5.S1 Training on human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_S1_Training_on_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.5.S1 Training on human rights",
      "question": "Does the company describe how its workers are trained on its human rights policy commitment(s)  OR does the company describe how relevant managers and workers, including those working on procurement, receive specific human rights training relevant to their role OR does the company describe how relevant managers and workers, including those working on security, receive specific human rights training relevant to their role?\n\nNote: In order to get a score of 1, the company needs to score at least 1 point under indicator A.1.2.a ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nEmbedding respect for human rights in company  culture and management systems<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe company’s statement(s) of commitment should be publicly  available in prominent locations and communicated actively to  workers, business relationships and others, including investors and  stakeholders, so that they are aware of the company’s commitments  and integrate the commitments into company culture. <br>\nThe company should align the policies and procedures that govern  its wider business activities and relationships with its responsibility  to respect human rights.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nThese steps of embedding policy commitments into company  culture and broader management systems and reinforcing them  with specific due diligence processes ensures that a company takes  a systematic and proactive, rather than ad hoc or reactive approach,  to respecting human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes how workers are trained on HRs policy commitments OR Trains relevant managers including procurement on HRs OR Trains relevant managers including security on HRs",
        "Score of at least 1 on A.1.2.a",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_S1_Training_on_human_rights_Cetegorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_S1_Training_on_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022368,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.5.S2 Training on human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_S2_Training_on_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.5.S2 Training on human rights",
      "question": "Does the company meet both of the requirements under Score 1 AND does the company describe the training it provides to suppliers/extractive business partners to help them meet its human rights policy commitment(s) AND does the company disclose the percentage of suppliers or business partners trained? \n\nNote: In order to get a score of 2 for the whole indicator, the company needs to score 2 points under indicator A.1.2.a",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nEmbedding respect for human rights in company  culture and management systems<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe company’s statement(s) of commitment should be publicly  available in prominent locations and communicated actively to  workers, business relationships and others, including investors and  stakeholders, so that they are aware of the company’s commitments  and integrate the commitments into company culture. <br>\nThe company should align the policies and procedures that govern  its wider business activities and relationships with its responsibility  to respect human rights.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nThese steps of embedding policy commitments into company  culture and broader management systems and reinforcing them  with specific due diligence processes ensures that a company takes  a systematic and proactive, rather than ad hoc or reactive approach,  to respecting human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Score of 2 on A.1.2.a",
        "Meets both requirements under score 1",
        "Trains suppliers to meet HRs commitments",
        "Trains BPs to meet HRs commitments",
        "Discloses % suppliers trained",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_S2_Training_on_human_rights_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_S2_Training_on_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022380,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.6.S1 Monitoring and corrective actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_S1_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.6.S1 Monitoring and corrective actions",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it monitors the implementation of its human rights policy commitment(s) across its global operations and supply chain/ with extractive business partners (eg, including external/independent third parties) AND the description includes the proportion of its supply chain/extractive business partners that is/are monitored AND does the company describe how workers are involved in the monitoring process? \n\nNote: In order to get a score of 1, does the company needs to score at least 1 point under indicator A.1.2.a ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nEmbedding respect for human rights in company  culture and management systems<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe company’s statement(s) of commitment should be publicly  available in prominent locations and communicated actively to  workers, business relationships and others, including investors and  stakeholders, so that they are aware of the company’s commitments  and integrate the commitments into company culture. <br>\nThe company should align the policies and procedures that govern  its wider business activities and relationships with its responsibility  to respect human rights.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nThese steps of embedding policy commitments into company  culture and broader management systems and reinforcing them  with specific due diligence processes ensures that a company takes  a systematic and proactive, rather than ad hoc or reactive approach,  to respecting human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Monitors implementation of HRs policy commitments across global ops and supply chain",
        "Discloses % of supply chain monitored",
        "Monitors implementation of HRs policy commitments across global ops and EX BPs",
        "Discloses % of EX BP's monitored",
        "Describes how workers are involved in monitoring",
        "Score of at least 1 on A.1.2.a",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_S1_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_S1_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022392,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.6.S2 Monitoring and corrective actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_S2_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.6.S2 Monitoring and corrective actions",
      "question": "Does the company describe its corrective action process(es) AND does the company publicly disclose the findings and number of corrective action process(es) as a result of the monitoring?  \n\nNote: In order to get a score of 2, does the company needs to score 2 points under indicator A.1.2.a ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nEmbedding respect for human rights in company  culture and management systems<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe company’s statement(s) of commitment should be publicly  available in prominent locations and communicated actively to  workers, business relationships and others, including investors and  stakeholders, so that they are aware of the company’s commitments  and integrate the commitments into company culture. <br>\nThe company should align the policies and procedures that govern  its wider business activities and relationships with its responsibility  to respect human rights.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nThese steps of embedding policy commitments into company  culture and broader management systems and reinforcing them  with specific due diligence processes ensures that a company takes  a systematic and proactive, rather than ad hoc or reactive approach,  to respecting human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Score of 2 on A.1.2.a",
        "Describes corrective actions process",
        "Discloses findings and number of correction action processes",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_S2_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_S2_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022404,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.7.S1 Engaging and terminating business relationships",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_7_S1_Engaging_and_terminating_business_relationships.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.7.S1 Engaging and terminating business relationships",
      "question": "Does the company describe how human rights performance is taken into account in the identification and selection of potential business relationships, including suppliers/extractive business partners AND does the company describe how human rights performance is taken into account in decisions to renew, expand, or terminate business relationships, including with suppliers/extractive business partners? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nEmbedding respect for human rights in company  culture and management systems<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe company’s statement(s) of commitment should be publicly  available in prominent locations and communicated actively to  workers, business relationships and others, including investors and  stakeholders, so that they are aware of the company’s commitments  and integrate the commitments into company culture. <br>\nThe company should align the policies and procedures that govern  its wider business activities and relationships with its responsibility  to respect human rights.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nThese steps of embedding policy commitments into company  culture and broader management systems and reinforcing them  with specific due diligence processes ensures that a company takes  a systematic and proactive, rather than ad hoc or reactive approach,  to respecting human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "HRs performance affects selection suppliers",
        "HRs performance affects selection EX BPs",
        "HRs performance affects continuation supplier relationships",
        "HRs performance affects ongoing BPs relationships",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.7.S1 Engaging and terminating business relationships+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_7_S1_Engaging_and_terminating_business_relationships+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_7_S1_Engaging_and_terminating_business_relationships+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022416,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.7.S2 Engaging and terminating business relationships",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_7_S2_Engaging_and_terminating_business_relationships.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.7.S2 Engaging and terminating business relationships",
      "question": "Does the company describe the specific incentives (eg price premiums, increased orders or longer contracts) offered to business relationships, including suppliers OR does the company describe how it supports business relationships, including suppliers/extractive business partners, in meeting the company's requirements?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nEmbedding respect for human rights in company  culture and management systems<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe company’s statement(s) of commitment should be publicly  available in prominent locations and communicated actively to  workers, business relationships and others, including investors and  stakeholders, so that they are aware of the company’s commitments  and integrate the commitments into company culture. <br>\nThe company should align the policies and procedures that govern  its wider business activities and relationships with its responsibility  to respect human rights.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nThese steps of embedding policy commitments into company  culture and broader management systems and reinforcing them  with specific due diligence processes ensures that a company takes  a systematic and proactive, rather than ad hoc or reactive approach,  to respecting human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.7.S2 Engaging and terminating business relationships+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_7_S2_Engaging_and_terminating_business_relationships+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_7_S2_Engaging_and_terminating_business_relationships+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022431,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.8.S1 Approach to engaging with affected stakeholders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_8_S1_Approach_to_engaging_with_affected_stakeholders.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.8.S1 Approach to engaging with affected stakeholders",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it has identified, and engaged with affected stakeholders, including workers or local communities in its supply chain, in the last two years OR does the company disclose the categories of stakeholders whose human rights have been or may be affected by its activities AND does the company provide two examples of its engagement with stakeholders whose human rights have been or may be affected by its activities (or their legitimate representatives or multi-stakeholder initiatives) in the last two years?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nEmbedding respect for human rights in company  culture and management systems<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe company’s statement(s) of commitment should be publicly  available in prominent locations and communicated actively to  workers, business relationships and others, including investors and  stakeholders, so that they are aware of the company’s commitments  and integrate the commitments into company culture. <br>\nThe company should align the policies and procedures that govern  its wider business activities and relationships with its responsibility  to respect human rights.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nThese steps of embedding policy commitments into company  culture and broader management systems and reinforcing them  with specific due diligence processes ensures that a company takes  a systematic and proactive, rather than ad hoc or reactive approach,  to respecting human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes how workers and communities identified and engaged in the last two years OR Discloses stakeholders whose HRs may be affected",
        "Provides two examples of engagement with stakeholders",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.8.S1 Approach to engaging with affected stakeholders+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_8_S1_Approach_to_engaging_with_affected_stakeholders+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_8_S1_Approach_to_engaging_with_affected_stakeholders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022443,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.8.S2 Approach to engaging with affected stakeholders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_8_S2_Approach_to_engaging_with_affected_stakeholders.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.8.S2 Approach to engaging with affected stakeholders",
      "question": "Does the company also provide a summary analysis of the input/views given by stakeholders on human rights issues AND does the company describe how these views have influenced the development or monitoring of its human rights approach? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nEmbedding respect for human rights in company  culture and management systems<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nThe company’s statement(s) of commitment should be publicly  available in prominent locations and communicated actively to  workers, business relationships and others, including investors and  stakeholders, so that they are aware of the company’s commitments  and integrate the commitments into company culture. <br>\nThe company should align the policies and procedures that govern  its wider business activities and relationships with its responsibility  to respect human rights.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nThese steps of embedding policy commitments into company  culture and broader management systems and reinforcing them  with specific due diligence processes ensures that a company takes  a systematic and proactive, rather than ad hoc or reactive approach,  to respecting human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Analysis of stakeholder views on company's HRs issues",
        "Describes how stakeholders views influenced company's HRs approach",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.8.S2 Approach to engaging with affected stakeholders+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_8_S2_Approach_to_engaging_with_affected_stakeholders+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_8_S2_Approach_to_engaging_with_affected_stakeholders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022455,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.1.S1 Identifying human rights risks and impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_S1_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.1.S1 Identifying human rights risks and impacts",
      "question": "Does the company describe the process(es) it uses to identify its human rights risks and impacts in specific locations or activities, covering its own operations AND does the company describe the process(es) it uses to identify its human rights risks and impacts in specific locations or activities through relevant business relationships, including its supply chain/extractive business partners?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nIdentifying and Assessing  <br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nCompanies should identify and assess any negative impacts on human  rights with which they may be involved. This includes actual impacts  (past or current) and potential impacts (those possible in the future –  also referred to as human rights risks), from the company’s own activities  and from its business relationships, direct relationships and those one or  more steps removed. The focus must be on risks to the human rights of  people, as distinct from risks to the business itself, although the two are  increasingly related.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nAssessing is the process by which the company gathers the basic  information it needs in order to know what its human rights risks are, so  it can prevent and mitigate them. It is the starting point for a company  to understand how to translate its human rights policy commitment  into practice. Therefore, involving different parts of the company in the  assessment process helps to build shared responsibility for addressing  the actual and potential impacts identified.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes process of identifying risks in own operations",
        "Describes process for identifying risks in business relationships",
        "Describes process for identifying risks in EX BPs",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_S1_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_S1_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022467,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.1.S2 Identifying human rights risks and impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_S2_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.1.S2 Identifying human rights risks and impacts",
      "question": "Does the company describe the global systems it has in place to identify its human rights risks and impacts on a regular basis across its activities involving consultation with affected stakeholders and internal or independent external human rights experts AND does the company describe how these systems are triggered by new country operations, new business relationships, new human rights challenges or conflicts affecting particular locations AND does the company describe the risks identified in relation to such events, including through heightened due diligence in any conflict-affected areas? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nIdentifying and Assessing  <br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nCompanies should identify and assess any negative impacts on human  rights with which they may be involved. This includes actual impacts  (past or current) and potential impacts (those possible in the future –  also referred to as human rights risks), from the company’s own activities  and from its business relationships, direct relationships and those one or  more steps removed. The focus must be on risks to the human rights of  people, as distinct from risks to the business itself, although the two are  increasingly related.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nAssessing is the process by which the company gathers the basic  information it needs in order to know what its human rights risks are, so  it can prevent and mitigate them. It is the starting point for a company  to understand how to translate its human rights policy commitment  into practice. Therefore, involving different parts of the company in the  assessment process helps to build shared responsibility for addressing  the actual and potential impacts identified.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes global risk identification system incl. stakeholder consultation",
        "Describes how risk identification system is triggered by new circumstances",
        "Describes risks identified in relation to new circumstances",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_S2_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_S2_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022479,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.2.S1 Assessing human rights risks and impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_S1_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.2.S1 Assessing human rights risks and impacts",
      "question": "Does the company describe its process(es) for assessing its human rights risks and disclose what it considers to be its salient human rights issues This description includes how relevant factors are taken into account, such as geographical, economic, social and other factors AND this description includes a description of how these processes apply to its supply chain/extractive business partners OR does the company publicly disclose the results of its assessments, which may be aggregated across its operations and locations? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br><br><br>Identifying and Assessing <br><br>What do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect? <br><br>Companies should identify and assess any negative impacts on human rights with which they may be involved. This includes actual impacts (past or current) and potential impacts (those possible in the future – also referred to as human rights risks), from the company’s own activities and from its business relationships, direct relationships and those one or more steps removed. The focus must be on risks to the human rights of people, as distinct from risks to the business itself, although the two are increasingly related. <br><br>Why is this important? <br><br>Assessing is the process by which the company gathers the basic information it needs in order to know what its human rights risks are, so it can prevent and mitigate them. It is the starting point for a company to understand how to translate its human rights policy commitment into practice. Therefore, involving different parts of the company in the assessment process helps to build shared responsibility for addressing the actual and potential impacts identified.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br><br>Scoring:<br><br>Most CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes assessment process and discloses salient HRs risks",
        "Describes how process applies to supply chain",
        "Describes how process applies to EX BPs",
        "Public disclosure of results of HRs risk assessment",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_S1_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_S1_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022491,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.2.S2 Assessing human rights risks and impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_S2_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.2.S2 Assessing human rights risks and impacts",
      "question": "Does the company meet all of the requirements under Score 1 AND does the company describe how it involves affected stakeholders in the assessment process(es)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nIdentifying and Assessing  <br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nCompanies should identify and assess any negative impacts on human  rights with which they may be involved. This includes actual impacts  (past or current) and potential impacts (those possible in the future –  also referred to as human rights risks), from the company’s own activities  and from its business relationships, direct relationships and those one or  more steps removed. The focus must be on risks to the human rights of  people, as distinct from risks to the business itself, although the two are  increasingly related.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?  <br>\n<br>\nAssessing is the process by which the company gathers the basic  information it needs in order to know what its human rights risks are, so  it can prevent and mitigate them. It is the starting point for a company  to understand how to translate its human rights policy commitment  into practice. Therefore, involving different parts of the company in the  assessment process helps to build shared responsibility for addressing  the actual and potential impacts identified.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Meets all requirements under score 1",
        "Describes how assessment involved affected stakeholders",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_S2_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_S2_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022506,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.3.S1 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact\nassessments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_S1_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.3.S1 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact\nassessments",
      "question": "Does the company describe its global system to prevent, mitigate or remediate its salient human rights issues AND this description includes a description of how its global system applies to its supply chain/extractive business partners OR does the company provide an example of the specific actions taken or to be taken on at least one of its salient human rights issues as a result of assessment processes in at least one of its activities/operations in the last three years?  ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br><br><br>Integrating and acting <br><br>What do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect? <br><br>To address negative human rights impacts, businesses should integrate the findings from their impact assessments across relevant internal functions and processes, act to prevent and mitigate the impacts identified, and have the internal decision-making, budget allocation and oversight processes in place to enable effective responses. <br><br>Why is this important? <br><br>Through the process of ‘integration’ a company can take the findings from its assessment of impacts, identify who in the company needs to be involved in addressing them, and work with them to decide on an effective response. It is through the actions it takes to prevent or mitigate impacts that the company actually reduces its impacts on people, which is central to achieving respect for human rights.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br><br>Scoring:<br><br>Most CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes system to prevent mitigate and remediate HRs issues",
        "Describes how global system applies to supply chain",
        "Describes how global system applies to EX BPs",
        "Example of actions decided on at least 1 salient HRs issue",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_S1_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_S1_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022518,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.3.S2 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact\nassessments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_S2_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.3.S2 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact\nassessments",
      "question": "Does the company meet all of the requirements under Score 1 AND does the company describe how it involves affected stakeholders in decisions about the actions to take in response to its salient human rights issues? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nIntegrating and acting  <br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nTo address negative human rights impacts, businesses should integrate the findings from their impact assessments across relevant internal functions and processes, act to prevent and mitigate the impacts  identified, and have the internal decision-making, budget allocation and  oversight processes in place to enable effective responses.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important? <br>\n<br>\nThrough the process of ‘integration’ a company can take the findings  from its assessment of impacts, identify who in the company needs  to be involved in addressing them, and work with them to decide on  an effective response. It is through the actions it takes to prevent or  mitigate impacts that the company actually reduces its impacts on  people, which is central to achieving respect for human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Meets all requirements under score 1",
        "Describes how stakeholders involved in decisions about actions taken",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_S2_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_S2_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022530,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.4.S1 Tracking the effectiveness of actions to respond to human\nrights risks and impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_S1_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.4.S1 Tracking the effectiveness of actions to respond to human\nrights risks and impacts",
      "question": "Does the company describe its system(s) for tracking or monitoring the actions taken in response to human rights risks and impacts and for evaluating whether the actions have been effective have missed key issues or have not produced the desired results OR does it provide an example of the lessons learned while tracking the effectiveness of its actions on at least one of its salient human rights issues as a result of its due diligence process(es)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nTracking  <br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nCompanies need to track their responses to actual and potential  human rights impacts to evaluate how effectively they are being  addressed. Tracking should be based on appropriate qualitative and  quantitative indicators and draw on internal and external feedback,  including from affected stakeholders.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this Important?  <br>\n<br>\nTracking how well the company is managing its human rights risks is the  only way the company can really know it is respecting human rights in  practice. Tracking is a crucial dimension of continuous improvement – it  helps the company identify trends and patterns; it highlights recurring problems that may require more systemic changes to policies or  processes, as well as good practices that can be shared across the  company. Tracking is also essential for the company to be able to  communicate accurately to all its stakeholders about what it is doing  to meet its responsibility to respect human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.4.S1 Tracking the effectiveness of actions to respond to human\nrights risks and impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_S1_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_S1_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022542,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.4.S2 Tracking the effectiveness of actions to respond to human\nrights risks and impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_S2_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.4.S2 Tracking the effectiveness of actions to respond to human\nrights risks and impacts",
      "question": "Does the company meet both of the requirements under Score 1 AND describe how it involves affected stakeholders in the evaluation(s) of whether the actions taken have been effective? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nTracking  <br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nCompanies need to track their responses to actual and potential  human rights impacts to evaluate how effectively they are being  addressed. Tracking should be based on appropriate qualitative and  quantitative indicators and draw on internal and external feedback,  including from affected stakeholders.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this Important?  <br>\n<br>\nTracking how well the company is managing its human rights risks is the  only way the company can really know it is respecting human rights in  practice. Tracking is a crucial dimension of continuous improvement – it  helps the company identify trends and patterns; it highlights recurring problems that may require more systemic changes to policies or  processes, as well as good practices that can be shared across the  company. Tracking is also essential for the company to be able to  communicate accurately to all its stakeholders about what it is doing  to meet its responsibility to respect human rights.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Meets all requirements under score 1",
        "Involves stakeholders in evaluation effectiveness of actions",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_S2_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_S2_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022554,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.5.S1 Communicating on human rights impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_5_S1_Communicating_on_human_rights_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.5.S1 Communicating on human rights impacts",
      "question": "Does the company provide at least two examples demonstrating how it communicates with affected stakeholders regarding specific human rights impacts raised by them or on their behalf? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nCommunicating  <br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nCompanies need to be prepared to communicate externally in  order to account for how they address their impacts, particularly  when concerns are raised by, or on behalf of, affected stakeholders.  Companies that may have severe human rights impacts should  report formally on how they address them.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this Important?  <br>\n<br>\nIt is by knowing and showing that they respect human rights in  practice that companies build trust in their performance, demonstrate  their reliability as partners, and gain a sustainable ‘social license to  operate’. More widely, it is part of being accountable for how they  do business, not least to those who may be impacted. Increasingly,  shareholders, governments, potential business relationships, stock  exchanges and civil society stakeholders also expect companies to  provide information on their human rights performance.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.5.S1 Communicating on human rights impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_5_S1_Communicating_on_human_rights_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_5_S1_Communicating_on_human_rights_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022565,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.5.S2 Communicating on human rights impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_5_S2_Communicating_on_human_rights_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.5.S2 Communicating on human rights impacts",
      "question": "Does the company describe any challenge(s) to effective communication it has identified and how it is working to address them?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nCommunicating  <br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights  expect?  <br>\n<br>\nCompanies need to be prepared to communicate externally in  order to account for how they address their impacts, particularly  when concerns are raised by, or on behalf of, affected stakeholders.  Companies that may have severe human rights impacts should  report formally on how they address them.  <br>\n<br>\nWhy is this Important?  <br>\n<br>\nIt is by knowing and showing that they respect human rights in  practice that companies build trust in their performance, demonstrate  their reliability as partners, and gain a sustainable ‘social license to  operate’. More widely, it is part of being accountable for how they  do business, not least to those who may be impacted. Increasingly,  shareholders, governments, potential business relationships, stock  exchanges and civil society stakeholders also expect companies to  provide information on their human rights performance.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_5_S2_Communicating_on_human_rights_impacts_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_5_S2_Communicating_on_human_rights_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022576,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.1.S1 Grievance mechanism(s) for workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_1_S1_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_workers.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.1.S1 Grievance mechanism(s) for workers",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it has one or more mechanism(s), or participates in a third-party or shared mechanism, accessible to all workers to raise complaints or concerns related to the company? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nRemedies and grievance mechanisms<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?<br>\n<br>\n• Where a company identifies that it has caused or contributed to negative human rights impacts, it should provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes.<br>\n• Companies should establish or participate in effective operational-level grievance mechanisms for stakeholders who may be negatively impacted by their activities.<br>\n• Remediation processes provided by the state or third-party institutions can provide alternative channels for affected stakeholders to raise complaints or concerns. Complainants should be free to choose which available channels they wish to use.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Access to effective remedy is a human right in itself and therefore a core part of respecting human rights. Unless a company actively engages in the remediation of impacts it has caused or contributed to, it cannot fully meet its responsibility to respect human rights. <br>\n• Negative impacts may occur despite a company’s best efforts, given the complexity of activities and business relationships involved. Companies need to be prepared for this situation so they can respond quickly and effectively.<br>\n• Strong remediation processes can help prevent impacts or conflicts from increasing or escalating.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.1.S1 Grievance mechanism(s) for workers+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_1_S1_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_1_S1_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022588,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.1.S2 Grievance mechanism(s) for workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_1_S2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_workers.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.1.S2 Grievance mechanism(s) for workers",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it ensures the mechanism(s) is available in all appropriate languages and that workers are aware of it (eg, specific communication(s)/training) AND does the company describe how it ensures workers in its supply chain/extractive business partners' operations have access to either the company’s own mechanism(s) to raise complaints or concerns about human rights issues at does the company’s suppliers or does the company expect its suppliers to establish a mechanism(s) for their workers to raise such complaints or concerns AND does the company expect its suppliers to convey the same expectation on access to grievance mechanism(s) to their own suppliers/extractive business partners?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nRemedies and grievance mechanisms<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?<br>\n<br>\n• Where a company identifies that it has caused or contributed to negative human rights impacts, it should provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes.<br>\n• Companies should establish or participate in effective operational-level grievance mechanisms for stakeholders who may be negatively impacted by their activities.<br>\n• Remediation processes provided by the state or third-party institutions can provide alternative channels for affected stakeholders to raise complaints or concerns. Complainants should be free to choose which available channels they wish to use.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Access to effective remedy is a human right in itself and therefore a core part of respecting human rights. Unless a company actively engages in the remediation of impacts it has caused or contributed to, it cannot fully meet its responsibility to respect human rights. <br>\n• Negative impacts may occur despite a company’s best efforts, given the complexity of activities and business relationships involved. Companies need to be prepared for this situation so they can respond quickly and effectively.<br>\n• Strong remediation processes can help prevent impacts or conflicts from increasing or escalating.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Grievance mechanism available in appropriate languages and workers made aware",
        "Describes how workers in supply chain access grievance mechanism",
        "Describes how workers in EX BPs access grievance mechanism",
        "Expects suppliers to convey expectation to their suppliers",
        "Expects EX BPs to convey expectation to their BPs",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_1_S2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_workers_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_1_S2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022600,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.2.S1 Grievance mechanism(s) for external individuals and\ncommunities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_2_S1_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_external_individuals_and_communities.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.2.S1 Grievance mechanism(s) for external individuals and\ncommunities",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it has one or more mechanism(s), or participates in a shared mechanism, accessible to all external individuals and communities who may be adversely impacted by the company, or those acting on their behalf, to raise complaints or concerns?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nRemedies and grievance mechanisms<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?<br>\n<br>\n• Where a company identifies that it has caused or contributed to negative human rights impacts, it should provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes.<br>\n• Companies should establish or participate in effective operational-level grievance mechanisms for stakeholders who may be negatively impacted by their activities.<br>\n• Remediation processes provided by the state or third-party institutions can provide alternative channels for affected stakeholders to raise complaints or concerns. Complainants should be free to choose which available channels they wish to use.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Access to effective remedy is a human right in itself and therefore a core part of respecting human rights. Unless a company actively engages in the remediation of impacts it has caused or contributed to, it cannot fully meet its responsibility to respect human rights. <br>\n• Negative impacts may occur despite a company’s best efforts, given the complexity of activities and business relationships involved. Companies need to be prepared for this situation so they can respond quickly and effectively.<br>\n• Strong remediation processes can help prevent impacts or conflicts from increasing or escalating.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.2.S1 Grievance mechanism(s) for external individuals and\ncommunities+Vasiliki Gkatziaki"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_2_S1_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_external_individuals_and_communities+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_2_S1_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_external_individuals_and_communities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022615,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.2.S2 Grievance mechanism(s) for external individuals and\ncommunities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_2_S2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_external_individuals_and_communities.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.2.S2 Grievance mechanism(s) for external individuals and\ncommunities",
      "question": "does the company describe how it ensures the mechanism(s) is available in local languages and that all affected external stakeholders at its own operations are aware of it (eg, specific communication(s)/training) AND does the company describe how it ensures external individuals and communities have access to either the company’s own mechanism(s) to raise complaints or concerns about human rights issues with the company’s suppliers/extractive business partners or does the company expect its suppliers/extractive business partners to establish a mechanism for them to raise such complaints or concerns AND does the company expect its suppliers/extractive business partners to convey the same expectation on access to grievance mechanism(s) to their suppliers/extractive business partners?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nRemedies and grievance mechanisms<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?<br>\n<br>\n• Where a company identifies that it has caused or contributed to negative human rights impacts, it should provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes.<br>\n• Companies should establish or participate in effective operational-level grievance mechanisms for stakeholders who may be negatively impacted by their activities.<br>\n• Remediation processes provided by the state or third-party institutions can provide alternative channels for affected stakeholders to raise complaints or concerns. Complainants should be free to choose which available channels they wish to use.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Access to effective remedy is a human right in itself and therefore a core part of respecting human rights. Unless a company actively engages in the remediation of impacts it has caused or contributed to, it cannot fully meet its responsibility to respect human rights. <br>\n• Negative impacts may occur despite a company’s best efforts, given the complexity of activities and business relationships involved. Companies need to be prepared for this situation so they can respond quickly and effectively.<br>\n• Strong remediation processes can help prevent impacts or conflicts from increasing or escalating.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Grievance mechanism available in appropriate languages and affected stakeholders made aware",
        "Describes how external individuals/communities access grievance mechanism",
        "Expects supplier to convey expectation to their suppliers",
        "Expects EX BPs to convey expectation to their BPs",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_2_S2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_external_individuals_and_communities_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_2_S2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_external_individuals_and_communities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022627,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.3.S1 Users are involved in the design and performance of the\nmechanism(s)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_3_S1_Users_are_involved_in_the_design_and_performance_of_the_mechanism_s.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.3.S1 Users are involved in the design and performance of the\nmechanism(s)",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it engages with potential or actual users on the design and performance of the mechanism(s) (such as on scope, methods of raising grievances, etc) OR does the company provide at least two examples of how it engages with potential or actual users on the design, implementation or performance of the mechanism(s)? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nRemedies and grievance mechanisms<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?<br>\n<br>\n• Where a company identifies that it has caused or contributed to negative human rights impacts, it should provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes.<br>\n• Companies should establish or participate in effective operational-level grievance mechanisms for stakeholders who may be negatively impacted by their activities.<br>\n• Remediation processes provided by the state or third-party institutions can provide alternative channels for affected stakeholders to raise complaints or concerns. Complainants should be free to choose which available channels they wish to use.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Access to effective remedy is a human right in itself and therefore a core part of respecting human rights. Unless a company actively engages in the remediation of impacts it has caused or contributed to, it cannot fully meet its responsibility to respect human rights. <br>\n• Negative impacts may occur despite a company’s best efforts, given the complexity of activities and business relationships involved. Companies need to be prepared for this situation so they can respond quickly and effectively.<br>\n• Strong remediation processes can help prevent impacts or conflicts from increasing or escalating.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.3.S1 Users are involved in the design and performance of the\nmechanism(s)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_3_S1_Users_are_involved_in_the_design_and_performance_of_the_mechanism_s+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_3_S1_Users_are_involved_in_the_design_and_performance_of_the_mechanism_s+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022639,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.3.S2 Users are involved in the design and performance of the\nmechanism(s)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_3_S2_Users_are_involved_in_the_design_and_performance_of_the_mechanism_s.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.3.S2 Users are involved in the design and performance of the\nmechanism(s)",
      "question": "Does the company also describe how it engages with potential or actual users (or individuals or organisations acting on their behalf) on the improvement of the mechanism(s) AND it provides at least two examples of doing so? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nRemedies and grievance mechanisms<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?<br>\n<br>\n• Where a company identifies that it has caused or contributed to negative human rights impacts, it should provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes.<br>\n• Companies should establish or participate in effective operational-level grievance mechanisms for stakeholders who may be negatively impacted by their activities.<br>\n• Remediation processes provided by the state or third-party institutions can provide alternative channels for affected stakeholders to raise complaints or concerns. Complainants should be free to choose which available channels they wish to use.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Access to effective remedy is a human right in itself and therefore a core part of respecting human rights. Unless a company actively engages in the remediation of impacts it has caused or contributed to, it cannot fully meet its responsibility to respect human rights. <br>\n• Negative impacts may occur despite a company’s best efforts, given the complexity of activities and business relationships involved. Companies need to be prepared for this situation so they can respond quickly and effectively.<br>\n• Strong remediation processes can help prevent impacts or conflicts from increasing or escalating.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes how users engaged on improvement of mechanism",
        "Provides user engagement examples (at least two) on improvement",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.3.S2 Users are involved in the design and performance of the\nmechanism(s)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_3_S2_Users_are_involved_in_the_design_and_performance_of_the_mechanism_s+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_3_S2_Users_are_involved_in_the_design_and_performance_of_the_mechanism_s+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022651,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.4.S1 Procedures related to the grievance mechanism(s) are\nequitable, publicly available and explained",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_4_S1_Procedures_related_to_the_grievance_mechanism_s_are_equitable_publicly_available_and_explained.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.4.S1 Procedures related to the grievance mechanism(s) are\nequitable, publicly available and explained",
      "question": "Does the company describe the procedures for managing the complaints or concerns, including timescales for addressing the complaints or concerns and for informing the complainant AND does the company describe the technical, financial or advisory support available to complainants to enable equal access to and participation in the grievance process? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nRemedies and grievance mechanisms<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?<br>\n<br>\n• Where a company identifies that it has caused or contributed to negative human rights impacts, it should provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes.<br>\n• Companies should establish or participate in effective operational-level grievance mechanisms for stakeholders who may be negatively impacted by their activities.<br>\n• Remediation processes provided by the state or third-party institutions can provide alternative channels for affected stakeholders to raise complaints or concerns. Complainants should be free to choose which available channels they wish to use.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Access to effective remedy is a human right in itself and therefore a core part of respecting human rights. Unless a company actively engages in the remediation of impacts it has caused or contributed to, it cannot fully meet its responsibility to respect human rights. <br>\n• Negative impacts may occur despite a company’s best efforts, given the complexity of activities and business relationships involved. Companies need to be prepared for this situation so they can respond quickly and effectively.<br>\n• Strong remediation processes can help prevent impacts or conflicts from increasing or escalating.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes procedure and timescales for managing complaints or concerns",
        "Describes technical & financial & advisory support to enable equal access",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.4.S1 Procedures related to the grievance mechanism(s) are\nequitable, publicly available and explained+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_4_S1_Procedures_related_to_the_grievance_mechanism_s_are_equitable_publicly_available_and_explained+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_4_S1_Procedures_related_to_the_grievance_mechanism_s_are_equitable_publicly_available_and_explained+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022663,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.4.S2 Procedures related to the grievance mechanism(s) are\nequitable, publicly available and explained",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_4_S2_Procedures_related_to_the_grievance_mechanism_s_are_equitable_publicly_available_and_explained.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.4.S2 Procedures related to the grievance mechanism(s) are\nequitable, publicly available and explained",
      "question": "Does the company explain the type(s) of outcome(s) to the complainant through the use of the grievance mechanism(s) AND does the company also describe how complaints or concerns for workers and all external individuals and communities may be escalated to more senior levels or independent third-party adjudicators or mediators to challenge the process or outcome? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nRemedies and grievance mechanisms<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?<br>\n<br>\n• Where a company identifies that it has caused or contributed to negative human rights impacts, it should provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes.<br>\n• Companies should establish or participate in effective operational-level grievance mechanisms for stakeholders who may be negatively impacted by their activities.<br>\n• Remediation processes provided by the state or third-party institutions can provide alternative channels for affected stakeholders to raise complaints or concerns. Complainants should be free to choose which available channels they wish to use.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Access to effective remedy is a human right in itself and therefore a core part of respecting human rights. Unless a company actively engages in the remediation of impacts it has caused or contributed to, it cannot fully meet its responsibility to respect human rights. <br>\n• Negative impacts may occur despite a company’s best efforts, given the complexity of activities and business relationships involved. Companies need to be prepared for this situation so they can respond quickly and effectively.<br>\n• Strong remediation processes can help prevent impacts or conflicts from increasing or escalating.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describe types of outcome to complainant through use of mechanism",
        "Describes escalation to senior levels / independent adjudicators",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.4.S2 Procedures related to the grievance mechanism(s) are\nequitable, publicly available and explained+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_4_S2_Procedures_related_to_the_grievance_mechanism_s_are_equitable_publicly_available_and_explained+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_4_S2_Procedures_related_to_the_grievance_mechanism_s_are_equitable_publicly_available_and_explained+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022675,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.5.S1 Prohibition of retaliation for raising complaints or concerns",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_5_S1_Prohibition_of_retaliation_for_raising_complaints_or_concerns.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.5.S1 Prohibition of retaliation for raising complaints or concerns",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it prohibits retaliation against workers and other stakeholders (including those that represent them) for raising human rights-related complaints or concerns AND does the company describe the measures in place to prevent retaliation (for example, through guaranteeing anonymity when complaints or concerns are raised or carrying out assessments of and addressing risks of retaliation)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nRemedies and grievance mechanisms<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?<br>\n<br>\n• Where a company identifies that it has caused or contributed to negative human rights impacts, it should provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes.<br>\n• Companies should establish or participate in effective operational-level grievance mechanisms for stakeholders who may be negatively impacted by their activities.<br>\n• Remediation processes provided by the state or third-party institutions can provide alternative channels for affected stakeholders to raise complaints or concerns. Complainants should be free to choose which available channels they wish to use.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Access to effective remedy is a human right in itself and therefore a core part of respecting human rights. Unless a company actively engages in the remediation of impacts it has caused or contributed to, it cannot fully meet its responsibility to respect human rights. <br>\n• Negative impacts may occur despite a company’s best efforts, given the complexity of activities and business relationships involved. Companies need to be prepared for this situation so they can respond quickly and effectively.<br>\n• Strong remediation processes can help prevent impacts or conflicts from increasing or escalating.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Public statement prohibiting retaliation against workers/stakeholders",
        "Describes practical measures to prevent retaliation",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.5.S1 Prohibition of retaliation for raising complaints or concerns+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_5_S1_Prohibition_of_retaliation_for_raising_complaints_or_concerns+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_5_S1_Prohibition_of_retaliation_for_raising_complaints_or_concerns+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022687,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.5.S2 Prohibition of retaliation for raising complaints or concerns",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_5_S2_Prohibition_of_retaliation_for_raising_complaints_or_concerns.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.5.S2 Prohibition of retaliation for raising complaints or concerns",
      "question": "Does the company also indicate that it will not retaliate against workers and stakeholders through legal action against persons or organisations who have brought or tried to bring a case against it involving credible allegations of adverse human rights impacts, or against the lawyers representing them; or firing or engaging in economic forms of retaliation against any workers or their representatives who have brought or tried to bring a case against it involving an allegation of human rights abuse; or engaging in violent acts or threats to the livelihoods, careers or reputation of claimants or their lawyers AND does the company expect its suppliers/extractive business partners to prohibit retaliation against workers and other stakeholders (including those that represent them) for raising human rights-related concerns?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nRemedies and grievance mechanisms<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?<br>\n<br>\n• Where a company identifies that it has caused or contributed to negative human rights impacts, it should provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes.<br>\n• Companies should establish or participate in effective operational-level grievance mechanisms for stakeholders who may be negatively impacted by their activities.<br>\n• Remediation processes provided by the state or third-party institutions can provide alternative channels for affected stakeholders to raise complaints or concerns. Complainants should be free to choose which available channels they wish to use.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Access to effective remedy is a human right in itself and therefore a core part of respecting human rights. Unless a company actively engages in the remediation of impacts it has caused or contributed to, it cannot fully meet its responsibility to respect human rights. <br>\n• Negative impacts may occur despite a company’s best efforts, given the complexity of activities and business relationships involved. Companies need to be prepared for this situation so they can respond quickly and effectively.<br>\n• Strong remediation processes can help prevent impacts or conflicts from increasing or escalating.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Specifies no legal action/firing/violence",
        "Expects suppliers to prohibit retaliation against workers/stakeholders",
        "Expects EX BPs to prohibit retaliation against workers/stakeholders",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_5_S2_Prohibition_of_retaliation_for_raising_complaints_or_concerns_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_5_S2_Prohibition_of_retaliation_for_raising_complaints_or_concerns+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022702,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.6.S1 Company involvement with state-based judicial and nonjudicial grievance mechanisms",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_6_S1_Company_involvement_with_state_based_judicial_and_nonjudicial_grievance_mechanisms.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.6.S1 Company involvement with state-based judicial and nonjudicial grievance mechanisms",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it does not require affected individuals or communities participating in a grievance process to permanently waive their legal rights to bring a claim through a judicial or non-judicial process as a condition of participating in the grievance process (eg by requiring binding arbitration or mediation) AND does the company indicate that it does not require confidentiality provisions (eg, non-disclosure agreements) with respect to human rights grievances? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nRemedies and grievance mechanisms<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?<br>\n<br>\n• Where a company identifies that it has caused or contributed to negative human rights impacts, it should provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes.<br>\n• Companies should establish or participate in effective operational-level grievance mechanisms for stakeholders who may be negatively impacted by their activities.<br>\n• Remediation processes provided by the state or third-party institutions can provide alternative channels for affected stakeholders to raise complaints or concerns. Complainants should be free to choose which available channels they wish to use.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Access to effective remedy is a human right in itself and therefore a core part of respecting human rights. Unless a company actively engages in the remediation of impacts it has caused or contributed to, it cannot fully meet its responsibility to respect human rights. <br>\n• Negative impacts may occur despite a company’s best efforts, given the complexity of activities and business relationships involved. Companies need to be prepared for this situation so they can respond quickly and effectively.<br>\n• Strong remediation processes can help prevent impacts or conflicts from increasing or escalating.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Complainants not asked to waive legal rights",
        "Does not require confidentiality provisions",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.6.S1 Company involvement with state-based judicial and nonjudicial grievance mechanisms+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_6_S1_Company_involvement_with_state_based_judicial_and_nonjudicial_grievance_mechanisms+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_6_S1_Company_involvement_with_state_based_judicial_and_nonjudicial_grievance_mechanisms+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022714,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.6.S2 Company involvement with state-based judicial and nonjudicial grievance mechanisms",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_6_S2_Company_involvement_with_state_based_judicial_and_nonjudicial_grievance_mechanisms.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.6.S2 Company involvement with state-based judicial and nonjudicial grievance mechanisms",
      "question": "Does the company also set out the process by which it cooperates with state-based non-judicial grievance mechanism(s) on complaints brought against it OR does the company provide an example of issues resolved (if applicable)? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nRemedies and grievance mechanisms<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?<br>\n<br>\n• Where a company identifies that it has caused or contributed to negative human rights impacts, it should provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes.<br>\n• Companies should establish or participate in effective operational-level grievance mechanisms for stakeholders who may be negatively impacted by their activities.<br>\n• Remediation processes provided by the state or third-party institutions can provide alternative channels for affected stakeholders to raise complaints or concerns. Complainants should be free to choose which available channels they wish to use.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Access to effective remedy is a human right in itself and therefore a core part of respecting human rights. Unless a company actively engages in the remediation of impacts it has caused or contributed to, it cannot fully meet its responsibility to respect human rights. <br>\n• Negative impacts may occur despite a company’s best efforts, given the complexity of activities and business relationships involved. Companies need to be prepared for this situation so they can respond quickly and effectively.<br>\n• Strong remediation processes can help prevent impacts or conflicts from increasing or escalating.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.6.S2 Company involvement with state-based judicial and nonjudicial grievance mechanisms+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_6_S2_Company_involvement_with_state_based_judicial_and_nonjudicial_grievance_mechanisms+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_6_S2_Company_involvement_with_state_based_judicial_and_nonjudicial_grievance_mechanisms+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022726,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.7.S1 Remedying adverse impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_7_S1_Remedying_adverse_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.7.S1 Remedying adverse impacts",
      "question": "For adverse human rights impacts that it has caused or to which it has contributed, does the company describe the approach it took to provide or enable a timely remedy for victims OR if no adverse impacts have been identified then does the company describe the approach it would take to provide or enable timely remedy for victims?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nRemedies and grievance mechanisms<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?<br>\n<br>\n• Where a company identifies that it has caused or contributed to negative human rights impacts, it should provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes.<br>\n• Companies should establish or participate in effective operational-level grievance mechanisms for stakeholders who may be negatively impacted by their activities.<br>\n• Remediation processes provided by the state or third-party institutions can provide alternative channels for affected stakeholders to raise complaints or concerns. Complainants should be free to choose which available channels they wish to use.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Access to effective remedy is a human right in itself and therefore a core part of respecting human rights. Unless a company actively engages in the remediation of impacts it has caused or contributed to, it cannot fully meet its responsibility to respect human rights. <br>\n• Negative impacts may occur despite a company’s best efforts, given the complexity of activities and business relationships involved. Companies need to be prepared for this situation so they can respond quickly and effectively.<br>\n• Strong remediation processes can help prevent impacts or conflicts from increasing or escalating.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.7.S1 Remedying adverse impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_7_S1_Remedying_adverse_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_7_S1_Remedying_adverse_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022738,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.7.S2 Remedying adverse impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_7_S2_Remedying_adverse_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.7.S2 Remedying adverse impacts",
      "question": "For adverse human rights impacts that it has caused or to which it has contributed, does the company also describe changes to systems, processes and practices to prevent similar adverse impacts in the future AND does the company describe its approach to monitoring the implementation of the agreed remedy OR if no adverse impacts have been identified then does the company describe the approach it would take to review and change systems, processes or practices to prevent similar adverse impacts in the future?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nRemedies and grievance mechanisms<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?<br>\n<br>\n• Where a company identifies that it has caused or contributed to negative human rights impacts, it should provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes.<br>\n• Companies should establish or participate in effective operational-level grievance mechanisms for stakeholders who may be negatively impacted by their activities.<br>\n• Remediation processes provided by the state or third-party institutions can provide alternative channels for affected stakeholders to raise complaints or concerns. Complainants should be free to choose which available channels they wish to use.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Access to effective remedy is a human right in itself and therefore a core part of respecting human rights. Unless a company actively engages in the remediation of impacts it has caused or contributed to, it cannot fully meet its responsibility to respect human rights. <br>\n• Negative impacts may occur despite a company’s best efforts, given the complexity of activities and business relationships involved. Companies need to be prepared for this situation so they can respond quickly and effectively.<br>\n• Strong remediation processes can help prevent impacts or conflicts from increasing or escalating.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.<br>\n<br>\nOn this particular metric, we have added the option of \"partially\" as companies can still score a half point for one of the <strong>AND</strong> questions. Full results for which one was met can be find in the full results in the linked source.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Partially"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.7.S2 Remedying adverse impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_7_S2_Remedying_adverse_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_7_S2_Remedying_adverse_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022753,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.8.S1 Communication on the effectiveness of grievance\nmechanism(s) and incorporating lessons learned",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_8_S1_Communication_on_the_effectiveness_of_grievance_mechanism_s_and_incorporating_lessons_learned.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.8.S1 Communication on the effectiveness of grievance\nmechanism(s) and incorporating lessons learned",
      "question": "Does the company disclose data about the practical operation of the mechanism(s), including the number of grievances about human rights issues filed, addressed or resolved and outcomes achieved for its own workers and for external individuals and communities that may be adversely impacted by the company AND does it provide an example of how lessons from the mechanism have contributed to improving the company's human rights management system(s)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nRemedies and grievance mechanisms<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?<br>\n<br>\n• Where a company identifies that it has caused or contributed to negative human rights impacts, it should provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes.<br>\n• Companies should establish or participate in effective operational-level grievance mechanisms for stakeholders who may be negatively impacted by their activities.<br>\n• Remediation processes provided by the state or third-party institutions can provide alternative channels for affected stakeholders to raise complaints or concerns. Complainants should be free to choose which available channels they wish to use.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Access to effective remedy is a human right in itself and therefore a core part of respecting human rights. Unless a company actively engages in the remediation of impacts it has caused or contributed to, it cannot fully meet its responsibility to respect human rights. <br>\n• Negative impacts may occur despite a company’s best efforts, given the complexity of activities and business relationships involved. Companies need to be prepared for this situation so they can respond quickly and effectively.<br>\n• Strong remediation processes can help prevent impacts or conflicts from increasing or escalating.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Discloses number of grievances filed/addressed or resolved and outcomes achieved",
        "Example of how lessons from mechanism improved HRs management system",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.8.S1 Communication on the effectiveness of grievance\nmechanism(s) and incorporating lessons learned+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_8_S1_Communication_on_the_effectiveness_of_grievance_mechanism_s_and_incorporating_lessons_learned+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_8_S1_Communication_on_the_effectiveness_of_grievance_mechanism_s_and_incorporating_lessons_learned+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022765,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.8.S2 Communication on the effectiveness of grievance\nmechanism(s) and incorporating lessons learned",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_8_S2_Communication_on_the_effectiveness_of_grievance_mechanism_s_and_incorporating_lessons_learned.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.8.S2 Communication on the effectiveness of grievance\nmechanism(s) and incorporating lessons learned",
      "question": "Does the company describe the process(es) to review the effectiveness of the grievance mechanism(s) and any changes made to improve it based on the review AND does the company describe the procedures it has in place to address delays or non-implementation of outcomes agreed with stakeholders? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nRemedies and grievance mechanisms<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights expect?<br>\n<br>\n• Where a company identifies that it has caused or contributed to negative human rights impacts, it should provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes.<br>\n• Companies should establish or participate in effective operational-level grievance mechanisms for stakeholders who may be negatively impacted by their activities.<br>\n• Remediation processes provided by the state or third-party institutions can provide alternative channels for affected stakeholders to raise complaints or concerns. Complainants should be free to choose which available channels they wish to use.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Access to effective remedy is a human right in itself and therefore a core part of respecting human rights. Unless a company actively engages in the remediation of impacts it has caused or contributed to, it cannot fully meet its responsibility to respect human rights. <br>\n• Negative impacts may occur despite a company’s best efforts, given the complexity of activities and business relationships involved. Companies need to be prepared for this situation so they can respond quickly and effectively.<br>\n• Strong remediation processes can help prevent impacts or conflicts from increasing or escalating.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes process to evaluate mechanism and changes made as a result",
        "Decribes procedures to address delays of outcomes agreed with stakeholders",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.8.S2 Communication on the effectiveness of grievance\nmechanism(s) and incorporating lessons learned+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_8_S2_Communication_on_the_effectiveness_of_grievance_mechanism_s_and_incorporating_lessons_learned+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_8_S2_Communication_on_the_effectiveness_of_grievance_mechanism_s_and_incorporating_lessons_learned+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022777,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1.a.S1 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_a_S1_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.1.a.S1 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "question": "Does the company discloses a time-bound target for paying all workers a living wage or does the company indicates that pays all workers a living wage AND does the company describe how it determines a living wage for the regions where it operates, which includes involvement of relevant trade unions (or equivalent worker bodies where the rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining are restricted under law) ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Pays living wage or sets time-bound target",
        "Describes how living wage determined",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1.a.S1 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_a_S1_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_a_S1_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022789,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1.a.S2 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_a_S2_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.1.a.S2 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it has achieved paying a living wage AND does the company indicate that it regularly reviews its definition of the living wage including with relevant trade unions (or equivalent worker bodies where the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining is restricted under law)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Achieved paying a living wage",
        "Reviews definition living wage with unions",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1.a.S2 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_a_S2_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_a_S2_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022804,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1.b.S1 Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_b_S1_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.1.b.S1 Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a timebound target for requiring its suppliers to pay all workers a living wage or does the company include requirements to pay workers a living wage in its contractual arrangements with its suppliers or its supplier code of conduct AND does the company describe how it works to support the payment of a living wage by its suppliers? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on living wage in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Describes work with suppliers on living wage",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1.b.S1 Living wage (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_b_S1_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_b_S1_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022816,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1.b.S2 Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_b_S2_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.1.b.S2 Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) payment below living wages in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress?  ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment of scope of payment below living wage in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1.b.S2 Living wage (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_b_S2_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_b_S2_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022828,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.2.S1 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_2_S1_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.2.S1 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "question": "Does the company describe the practices it adopts to avoid price or short notice requirements or other business considerations undermining human rights OR does the company describe the practices it adopts to pay suppliers in line with the agreed timeframe(s) and for the amount(s) agreed in the payment terms AND does the company review its own operations to mitigate the negative impacts of its purchasing practices in planning, merchandising and costing?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes practices to avoid price or short notice requirements that undermine HRs OR Describes practices to pay suppliers in line with agreed timeframes",
        "Reviews own operations to mitigate negative impact of purchasing practices",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.2.S1 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_2_S1_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_2_S1_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022839,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "question": "Does the company meet all of the requirements under Score 1 AND does the company provide an example of how it assessed, addressed, and made changes to its purchasing practices to avoid undermining its human rights commitments?  ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Meets all requirements under score 1",
        "Example of assessing and changing of purchasing practices",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022850,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.3.S1 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_3_S1_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.3.S1 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it identifies its suppliers, including direct and indirect suppliers? This needs to include the product source (eg farm, fishery, factories, manufacturing sites for components, mills, etc) ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.3.S1 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_3_S1_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_3_S1_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022862,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.3.S2 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_3_S2_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.3.S2 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "question": "Does the company also disclose the names and specific locations of the direct and indirect suppliers who make up the most significant parts of its supply chain and explain how it has defined what are the most significant parts of its supply chain AND does the company disclose which direct or indirect suppliers it considers to be involved in higher-risk activities, geographies, and products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Discloses names and locations of significant parts of the supply chain and how significance was defined",
        "Discloses direct or indirect suppliers involved in higher-risk activities",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.3.S2 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_3_S2_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_3_S2_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022874,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.4.a.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_a_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.4.a.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it does not use child labour AND does the company indicate that it verifies the age of workers recruited in its own operations to ensure that they are not engaged in child labour?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Indicates it does not use child labour",
        "Age verification of recruited workers",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.4.a.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_a_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_a_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022889,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.4.a.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_a_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.4.a.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company also describe how it develops, participates in or contributes to programmes for transition from employment to education, enabling children to attend and remain in education, if and when child labour is found in its operations and how it improves working conditions for young workers where relevant?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.4.a.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_a_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_a_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022901,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.4.b.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_b_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.4.b.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements with its suppliers or supplier code of conduct, does the company include child labour requirements, including a prohibition on using child labour, verifying the age of workers recruited, and remediation programmes AND does the company describe how it works with suppliers to eliminate child labour and to improve working conditions for young workers where relevant?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on child labour in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Describes work with suppliers on eliminating child labour",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.4.b.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_b_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_b_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022913,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.4.b.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_b_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.4.b.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) child labour in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment of scope of child labour in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.4.b.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_b_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_b_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022925,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.a.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_a_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.a.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "does the company indicate that job seekers and workers do not pay any recruitment fees or related costs to secure a job (The Employer Pays Principle) AND does the company commit to fully reimbursing them if they have been required to pay any fees or related costs during recruitment? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Job seekers/workers do not pay recruitment fee",
        "Commitment to fully reimburse recruitment fees paid",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.a.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_a_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_a_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022937,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.a.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_a_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.a.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company also describe how it implements and monitors this practice in its own operations, particularly with employment agencies/labour brokers/recruitment intermediaries?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.a.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_a_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_a_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022949,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.b.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_b_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.b.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements or supplier code of conduct, does the company prohibit suppliers and any third-party recruitment intermediaries from imposing financial burdens on job seekers and workers by collecting recruitment fees or related costs AND does the company describe how it works with suppliers to eliminate recruitment fees and related costs, including by ensuring full reimbursement to workers where relevant?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on debt/fees in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Describes work with suppliers on debt/fees for job seekers/workers",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.b.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_b_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_b_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022961,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.b.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_b_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.b.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) the payment of recruitment fees or related costs in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment scope of payment of recruitment fees in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.b.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_b_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_b_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022973,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.c.S1 Wage practices (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_c_S1_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.c.S1 Wage practices (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it pays workers regularly, in full and on time AND does the company indicate that all workers receive a payslip with their wages explaining any legitimate deductions? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Pays workers regularly in full and on time",
        "Worker payslips shows wages and legitimate deductions",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.c.S1 Wage practices (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_c_S1_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_c_S1_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18022985,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.c.S2 Wage practices (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_c_S2_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.c.S2 Wage practices (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company also describe how it implements and monitors this practice in its own operations, particularly with employment agencies/labour brokers/recruitment intermediaries?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.c.S2 Wage practices (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_c_S2_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_c_S2_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023000,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.d.S1 Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_d_S1_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.d.S1 Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements with suppliers or supplier code of conduct, does the company require the suppliers to pay workers directly, in full and on time AND does the company describe how it works with the supply chain to pay workers regularly, in full and on time? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on paying in full and on time in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Describes work with suppliers on paying workers regularly in full and on time",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.d.S1 Wage practices (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_d_S1_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_d_S1_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023012,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.d.S2 Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_d_S2_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.d.S2 Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) failure to pay directly, in full and on time in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment scope of failure to pay workers in full and on time in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.d.S2 Wage practices (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_d_S2_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_d_S2_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023024,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.e.S1 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_e_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.e.S1 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it does not retain workers’ personal documents or restrict workers’ freedom of movement or require workers to use company provided accommodation? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.e.S1 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+Vasiliki Gkatziaki"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_e_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_e_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023036,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.e.S2 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_e_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.e.S2 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company also describe how it implements and checks this practice in its operations, particularly with employment agencies/labour brokers/recruitment intermediaries?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.e.S2 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_e_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_e_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023048,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.f.S1 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_f_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.f.S1 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements or within its supplier code of conduct does the company prohibit suppliers from retaining workers’ personal documents or restricting workers’ freedom of movement or requiring workers to use company provided accommodation AND does the company describe how it works with suppliers to eliminate retention of worker’s documents or other actions to physically restrict movement? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on free movement in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Describes working with suppliers on free movement of workers",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.f.S1 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_f_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_f_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023060,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.f.S2 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_f_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.f.S2 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) retaining documents or restricting movement in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment of scope of restriction of movement in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.f.S2 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_f_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_f_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023072,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.6.a.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_a_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.6.a.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company put in place measures to prohibit any form of intimidation, harassment, retaliation or violence against workers seeking to exercise the right to form and join a trade union of their choice (or equivalent worker bodies where the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining is restricted under law) OR does the company disclose the proportion of its total direct operations workforce covered by collective bargaining agreements? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.6.a.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_a_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_a_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023083,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.6.a.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_a_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.6.a.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company meets both of the requirements under Score 1? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.6.a.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_a_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_a_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023094,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.6.b.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_b_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.6.b.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements with its suppliers or supplier code of conduct, does the company require respect for the right of all workers to form and join a trade union of their choice (or equivalent worker bodies where the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining is restricted under law) and to bargain collectively and prohibiting intimidation, harassment, retaliation and violence against trade union members and trade union representatives AND does the company describe how it works to support the practices of its suppliers in relation to freedom of association and collective bargaining? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on FoA/CB in suppliers codes and contracts",
        "Describes work with suppliers on FoA/CB",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.6.b.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_b_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_b_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023105,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.6.b.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_b_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.6.b.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) restrictions to freedom of association or collective bargaining in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment of scope of restriction of FoA/CB in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.6.b.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_b_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_b_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023116,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7.a.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_a_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.7.a.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "question": "Does the company describe the process(es) it has in place to identify its health and safety risks and impacts AND discloses quantitative information on health and safety for its workers related to injury rates or lost days (or near miss frequency rate) for the last reporting period AND does the company disclose fatalities for the last reporting period AND does the company disclose occupational disease rates for the last reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes process to identify H&S risks and impacts",
        "Discloses injury rate or lost days for own workers in last reporting period",
        "Discloses fatalities for own workers in last reporting period",
        "Discloses occupational disease rate for own workers in last reporting period",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_a_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_a_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023128,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7.a.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_a_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.7.a.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "question": "Does the company also set targets related to injury rates or lost days (or near miss frequency rate) and fatalities and occupational disease rates for the last reporting period AND has it met those targets or provides an explanation of why these were not met or how it works to improve its health and safety management systems?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Sets targets for H&S performance",
        "Met targets or explains why not or how improve H&S management systems",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7.a.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_a_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_a_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023140,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements with suppliers or supplier code of conduct, does the company set out clear health and safety requirements AND does the company disclose quantitative information on health and safety for workers at suppliers related to injury rates or lost days (or near miss frequency rate) for the last reporting period AND does the company disclose fatalities for the last reporting period AND does the company disclose occupational disease rates for the last reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on H&S in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Discloses injury rate or lost days in supply chain in last reporting period",
        "Discloses fatalities for workers in supply chain in last reporting period",
        "Discloses occupational disease rate in supply chain in last reporting period",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023152,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company also describe how it works with its supply chain to improve its practices in relation to health and safety AND does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) health and safety issues in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes work with suppliers of H&S",
        "Assessment of scope of H&S issues in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023167,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.8.a.S1 Land acquisition (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_a_S1_Land_acquisition_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.8.a.S1 Land acquisition (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company describe its approach to identifying land tenure rights holders and negotiating compensation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Conversion for Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.8.a.S1 Land acquisition (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_a_S1_Land_acquisition_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_a_S1_Land_acquisition_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023178,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.8.a.S2 Land acquisition (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_a_S2_Land_acquisition_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.8.a.S2 Land acquisition (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "For any new or on-going land resettlements, does the company also describe how it provides financial compensation or other compensation alternatives, including its valuation methods and how legitimate tenure rights holders were involved in determining the valuation AND if a state has been involved in the transaction, does the company follow IFC Performance Standard 5 on Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement and describes the steps it has taken to meet the standards with respect to legitimate tenure rights holders?  \n\nIF the company has not engaged in any land transactions in the past two years, it describes its approach in relation to all elements above  ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes approach to compensation including valuation",
        "Describes steps to meet IFC PS 5 in state deals",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.8.a.S2 Land acquisition (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_a_S2_Land_acquisition_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_a_S2_Land_acquisition_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023189,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.8.b.S1 Land acquisition (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_b_S1_Land_acquisition_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.8.b.S1 Land acquisition (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company include land requirements, including the requirements to have a process to identify legitimate tenure rights holders when acquiring, leasing or making other arrangements to use, with particular attention to vulnerable or marginalised tenure rights holders, and to negotiate with them to provide adequate compensation or requested alternatives to financial compensation in its supplier code of conduct AND does the company work with suppliers to improve their practices in relation to land use/ acquisition?  ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on land and tenure rights in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Describes work with suppliers on land issues",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.8.b.S1 Land acquisition (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_b_S1_Land_acquisition_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_b_S1_Land_acquisition_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023200,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.8.b.S2 Land acquisition (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_b_S2_Land_acquisition_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.8.b.S2 Land acquisition (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company include resettlement requirements that require that the supplier provide financial compensation or other compensation alternatives, including their valuation methods and how legitimate tenure rights holders were involved in determining the valuation when they were involved in the resettlement AND does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) land rights issues in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress?  ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirement for suppliers to provide compensation in resettlement",
        "Assessment of scope of land rights issues in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_b_S2_Land_acquisition_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_b_S2_Land_acquisition_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023211,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.9.a.S1 Water and sanitation (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_a_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.9.a.S1 Water and sanitation (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it implements preventive and corrective action plans for identified specific risks to the right to water and sanitation in its own operations? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.9.a.S1 Water and sanitation (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_a_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_a_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023222,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.9.a.S2 Water and sanitation (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_a_S2_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.9.a.S2 Water and sanitation (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company also set specific targets on water stewardship that take into consideration water use by local communities and other users in the vicinity of its operations AND does the company report on its progress in meeting targets, including an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Sets targets on water stewardship that consider water use by local communities",
        "Reports progress in meeting targets and trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.9.a.S2 Water and sanitation (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_a_S2_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_a_S2_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023233,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.9.b.S1 Water and sanitation (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_b_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.9.b.S1 Water and sanitation (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company include access to water and sanitation requirements, including refraining from negatively affecting access to safe water, in its contractual arrangements with its suppliers or in its supplier code of conduct AND does the company describe how it works with suppliers to improve their practices in relation to access to water and sanitation? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on access to water and sanitation in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Describes work with suppliers on access to water",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.9.b.S1 Water and sanitation (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_b_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_b_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023244,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.9.b.S2 Water and sanitation (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_b_S2_Water_and_sanitation_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.9.b.S2 Water and sanitation (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) lack of access to water and sanitation in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment of scope of water and sanitation issues in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.9.b.S2 Water and sanitation (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_b_S2_Water_and_sanitation_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_b_S2_Water_and_sanitation_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023255,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.10.a.S1 Women’s rights (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_a_S1_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.10.a.S1 Women’s rights (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations",
      "question": "Does the company describe its process(es) to prohibit and address harassment, intimidation and violence against women OR does the company describe how it takes into account differential impacts on women and men of working conditions, including to reproductive health AND does the company describe how it measures and takes steps to address any gender pay gap throughout all levels of employment? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes processes to stop harassment and violence against women OR Working conditions take into account gender issues",
        "Measures and steps to address gender pay gap at all levels of employment",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.10.a.S1 Women’s rights (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_a_S1_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_a_S1_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023270,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.10.a.S2 Women’s rights (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_a_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.10.a.S2 Women’s rights (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations",
      "question": "Does the company meet all of the requirements under Score 1 AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress on closing any gender pay gap? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Meets all requirements under score 1",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress closing gender pay gap",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_a_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_a_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023282,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.10.b.S1 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_b_S1_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.10.b.S1 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements with suppliers or supplier code of conduct, does the company require suppliers to provide equal pay for equal work, introduce measures to ensure equal opportunities throughout all levels of employment and eliminate health and safety concerns that are particularly prevalent among women workers AND does the company work with suppliers to improve their practices in relation to women’s rights? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on women's rights in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Describes work with suppliers on women's rights",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.10.b.S1 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_b_S1_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_b_S1_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023294,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.10.b.S2 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_b_S2_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.10.b.S2 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) discrimination or unsafe working conditions for women in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment of scope of women's rights issues in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.10.b.S2 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_b_S2_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_b_S2_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023306,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.1.a.S1 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_a_S1_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.1.a.S1 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a time-bound target for paying all workers a living wage or does the company indicate that pays all workers a living wage AND does the company describe how it determines a living wage for the regions where it operates, which includes involvement of relevant trade unions (or equivalent worker bodies where the rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining are restricted under law)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Pays living wage or sets time-bound target",
        "Describes how living wage determined",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.1.a.S1 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_a_S1_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_a_S1_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023318,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.1.a.S2 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_a_S2_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.1.a.S2 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it has achieved paying a living wage AND does the company indicate that it regularly reviews its definition of the living wage including with relevant trade unions (or equivalent worker bodies where the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining is restricted under law)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Achieved paying a living wage",
        "Reviews definition living wage with unions",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.1.a.S2 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_a_S2_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_a_S2_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023330,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.1.b.S1 Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_b_S1_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.1.b.S1 Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a timebound target for requiring its suppliers to pay all workers a living wage or does the company include requirements to pay workers a living wage in its contractual arrangements with its suppliers or its supplier code of conduct AND does the company describe how it works to support the payment of a living wage by its suppliers? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on living wage in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Describes work with suppliers on living wage",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.1.b.S1 Living wage (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_b_S1_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_b_S1_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023342,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.1.b.S2 Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_b_S2_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.1.b.S2 Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) payment below living wages in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress?  ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment of scope of payment below living wage in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.1.b.S2 Living wage (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_b_S2_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_b_S2_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023354,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.2.S1 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_2_S1_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.2.S1 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "question": "Does the company describe the practices it adopts to avoid price or short notice requirements or other business considerations undermining human rights OR does the company describe the practices it adopts to pay suppliers in line with the agreed timeframe(s) and for the amount(s) agreed in the payment terms AND does the company review its own operations to mitigate the negative impacts of its purchasing practices in planning, merchandising and costing?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes practices to avoid price or short notice requirements that undermine HRs OR Describes practices to pay suppliers in line with agreed timeframes",
        "Reviews own operations to mitigate negative impact of purchasing practices",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.2.S1 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_2_S1_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_2_S1_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023365,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "question": "Does the company meet all of the requirements under Score 1 AND does the company provide an example of how it assessed, addressed, and made changes to its purchasing practices to avoid undermining its human rights commitments?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Meets all requirements under score 1",
        "Example of assessing and changing of purchasing practices",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023376,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.3.S1 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_3_S1_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.3.S1 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it identifies its suppliers, including direct and indirect suppliers This needs to include the product source (eg farm, fishery, factories, manufacturing sites for components, mills, etc)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.3.S1 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_3_S1_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_3_S1_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023387,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.3.S2 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_3_S2_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.3.S2 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "question": "Does the company also disclose the names and specific locations of the direct and indirect suppliers who make up the most significant parts of its supply chain and explain how it has defined what are the most significant parts of its supply chain AND does the company disclose which direct or indirect suppliers it considers to be involved in higher-risk activities, geographies, and products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Discloses names and locations of significant parts of supply chain and how significance was defined",
        "Discloses direct or indirect suppliers involved in higher-risk activities",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.3.S2 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_3_S2_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_3_S2_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023399,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4.a.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_a_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.4.a.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it does not use child labour AND does the company indicate that it verifies the age of workers recruited in its own operations to ensure that they are not engaged in child labour? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Indicates it does not use child labour",
        "Age verification of recruited workers",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4.a.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_a_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_a_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023411,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4.a.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_a_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.4.a.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company also describe how it develops, participates in or contributes to programmes for the transition from employment to education, enabling children to attend and remain in education, if and when child labour is found in its operations and how it improves working conditions for young workers where relevant?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4.a.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_a_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_a_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023423,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4.b.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_b_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.4.b.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements with its suppliers or supplier code of conduct, does the company include child labour requirements, including a prohibition on using child labour, verifying the age of workers recruited, and remediation programmes AND does the company describe how it works with suppliers to eliminate child labour and to improve working conditions for young workers where relevant?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on child labour in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Describes work with suppliers on eliminating child labour",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4.b.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_b_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_b_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023435,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4.b.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_b_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.4.b.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) child labour in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment of scope of child labour in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4.b.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_b_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_b_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023447,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.a.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_a_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.a.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that job seekers and workers do not pay any recruitment fees or related costs to secure a job (The Employer Pays Principle) AND does the company commit to fully reimbursing them if they have been required to pay any fees or related costs during recruitment? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Job seekers/workers do not pay recruitment fee",
        "Commitment to fully reimburse recruitment fees paid",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.a.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_a_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_a_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023459,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.a.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_a_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.a.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company also describe how it implements and monitors this practice in its own operations, particularly with employment agencies/labour brokers/recruitment intermediaries? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.a.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_a_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_a_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023471,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.b.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_b_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.b.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements or supplier code of conduct, does the company prohibit suppliers and any third-party recruitment intermediaries from imposing financial burdens on job seekers and workers by collecting recruitment fees or related costs AND does the company describe how it works with suppliers to eliminate recruitment fees and related costs, including by ensuring full reimbursement to workers where relevant? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on debt/fees in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Describes work with suppliers on debt/fees for job seekers/workers",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.b.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_b_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_b_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023486,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.b.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_b_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.b.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) the payment of recruitment fees or related costs in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment scope of payment of recruitment fees in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.b.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_b_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_b_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023498,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.c.S1 Wage practices (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_c_S1_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.c.S1 Wage practices (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it pays workers regularly, in full and on time AND does the company indicate that all workers receive a payslip with their wages explaining any legitimate deductions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Pays workers regularly in full and on time",
        "Payslip workers shows wages and legitimate deductions",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.c.S1 Wage practices (in own production or manufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_c_S1_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_c_S1_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023510,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.c.S2 Wage practices (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_c_S2_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.c.S2 Wage practices (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company also describe how it implements and monitors this practice in its own operations, particularly with employment agencies/labour brokers/recruitment intermediaries?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.c.S2 Wage practices (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_c_S2_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_c_S2_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023522,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.d.S1 Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_d_S1_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.d.S1 Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements with suppliers or supplier code of conduct, does the company require the suppliers to pay workers directly, in full and on time AND does the company describe how it works with the supply chain to pay workers regularly, in full and on time? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on paying in full and on time in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Describes work with suppliers on paying workers regularly in full and on time",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.d.S1 Wage practices (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_d_S1_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_d_S1_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023534,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.d.S2 Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_d_S2_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.d.S2 Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) failure to pay directly, in full and on time in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment scope of failure to pay workers in full and on time in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.d.S2 Wage practices (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_d_S2_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_d_S2_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023546,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.e.S1 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_e_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.e.S1 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it does not retain workers’ personal documents or restrict workers’ freedom of movement or require workers to use company provided accommodation? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.e.S1 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_e_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_e_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023561,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.e.S2 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_e_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.e.S2 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company also describe how it implements and checks this practice in its operations, particularly with employment agencies/labour brokers/recruitment intermediaries?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.e.S2 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_e_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_e_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023573,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.f.S1 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_f_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.f.S1 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements or within its supplier code of conduct does the company prohibit suppliers from retaining workers’ personal documents or restricting workers’ freedom of movement or requiring workers to use company provided accommodation AND does the company describe how it works with suppliers to eliminate retention of worker’s documents or other actions to physically restrict movement? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on free movement in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Describes working with suppliers on free movement of workers",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.f.S1 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_f_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_f_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023585,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.f.S2 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_f_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.f.S2 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) retaining documents or restricting movement in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment of scope of restriction of movement in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.f.S2 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_f_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_f_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023597,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.6.a.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_a_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.6.a.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company put in place measures to prohibit any form of intimidation, harassment, retaliation or violence against workers seeking to exercise the right to form and join a trade union of their choice (or equivalent worker bodies where the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining is restricted under law) OR does the company disclose the proportion of its total direct operations workforce covered by collective bargaining agreements? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.6.a.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_a_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_a_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023608,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.6.a.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_a_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.6.a.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company meet both of the requirements under Score 1? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.6.a.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_a_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_a_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023619,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.6.b.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_b_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.6.b.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements with its suppliers or supplier code of conduct, does the company require respect for the right of all workers to form and join a trade union of their choice (or equivalent worker bodies where the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining is restricted under law) and to bargain collectively and prohibiting intimidation, harassment, retaliation and violence against trade union members and trade union representatives AND does the company describe how it works to support the practices of its suppliers in relation to freedom of association and collective bargaining? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on FoA/CB in suppliers codes and contracts",
        "Describes work with suppliers on FoA/CB",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.6.b.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_b_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_b_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023630,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.6.b.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_b_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.6.b.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) restrictions to freedom of association or collective bargaining in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment of scope of restriction of FoA/CB in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.6.b.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_b_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_b_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023641,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7.a.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.7.a.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "question": "does the company describe the process(es) it has in place to identify its health and safety risks and impacts AND does the company disclose quantitative information on health and safety for its workers related to injury rates or lost days (or near miss frequency rate) for the last reporting period AND does the company disclose fatalities for the last reporting period AND does the company disclose occupational disease rates for the last reporting period? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes process to identify H&S risks and impacts",
        "Discloses injury rate or lost days for own workers in last reporting period",
        "Discloses fatalities for own workers in last reporting period",
        "Discloses occupational disease rate for own workers in last reporting period",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023656,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7.a.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.7.a.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "question": "Does the company also set targets related to injury rates or lost days (or near miss frequency rate) and fatalities and occupational disease rates for the last reporting period AND it meet those targets or provide an explanation of why these were not met or how it works to improve its health and safety management systems? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Sets targets for H&S performance",
        "Met targets or explains why not or how improve H&S management systems",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7.a.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023668,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements with suppliers or supplier code of conduct, does the company set out clear health and safety requirements AND does the company disclose quantitative information on health and safety for workers at suppliers related to injury rates or lost days (or near miss frequency rate) for the last reporting period AND does the company disclose fatalities for the last reporting period AND does the company disclose occupational disease rates for the last reporting period? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on H&S in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Discloses injury rate or lost days in supply chain in last reporting period",
        "Discloses fatalities for workers in supply chain in last reporting period",
        "Discloses occupational disease rate in supply chain in last reporting period",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023683,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company also describe how it works with its supply chain to improve its practices in relation to health and safety AND does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) health and safety issues in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes work with suppliers of H&S",
        "Assessment of scope of H&S issues in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023695,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8.a.S1 Women’s rights (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_S1_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.8.a.S1 Women’s rights (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company describe its process(es) to prohibit and address harassment, intimidation and violence against women OR does the company describe how it takes into account differential impacts on women and men of working conditions, including reproductive health AND does the company describe how it measures and takes steps to address any gender pay gap throughout all levels of employment? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes processes to stop harassment and violence against women OR Working conditions take into account gender issues",
        "Measures and steps to address gender pay gap at all levels of employment",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8.a.S1 Women’s rights (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_S1_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_S1_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023707,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8.a.S2 Women’s rights (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.8.a.S2 Women’s rights (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company meet all of the requirements under Score 1 AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress on closing any gender pay gap?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Meets all requirements under score 1",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress closing gender pay gap",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023719,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8.b.S1 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_b_S1_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.8.b.S1 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements with suppliers or supplier code of conduct, does the company require suppliers to provide equal pay for equal work, introduce measures to ensure equal opportunities throughout all levels of employment and to eliminate health and safety concerns that are particularly prevalent among women workers AND does the company work with suppliers to improve their practices in relation to women’s rights?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on women's rights in contracts/codes with suppliers",
        "Describes work with suppliers on women's rights",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8.b.S1 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_b_S1_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_b_S1_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023731,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8.b.S2 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_b_S2_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.8.b.S2 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) discrimination or unsafe working conditions for women in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment of scope of unsafe working conditions/discrimination against women in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8.b.S2 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_b_S2_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_b_S2_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023743,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9.a.S1 Working hours (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_a_S1_Working_hours_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.9.a.S1 Working hours (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it respects applicable international standards concerning maximum hours and minimum breaks and rest periods in its own operations AND does the company assess the ability of workers within its factories to comply with its commitments to respect working hours and minimum breaks and rest periods when allocating work or setting targets? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Respects HRs regarding working hours/breaks/rest",
        "Assesses ability of workers to comply with working hours commitments when allocating work",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9.a.S1 Working hours (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_a_S1_Working_hours_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_a_S1_Working_hours_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023754,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9.a.S2 Working hours (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_a_S2_Working_hours_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.9.a.S2 Working hours (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it implements and checks this practice in its operations? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9.a.S2 Working hours (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_a_S2_Working_hours_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_a_S2_Working_hours_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023765,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9.b.S1 Working hours (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_b_S1_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.9.b.S1 Working hours (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements with suppliers or supplier code of conduct, does the company require suppliers to respect applicable international standards concerning maximum hours and minimum breaks and rest periods AND does the company describe how it works with suppliers to improve their practices in relation to working hours? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on working hours in codes/contracts with suppliers",
        "Describes work with suppliers on working hours",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9.b.S1 Working hours (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_b_S1_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_b_S1_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023776,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9.b.S2 Working hours (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_b_S2_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.9.b.S2 Working hours (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) excessive working hours in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assesment of scope of excessive working hours in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9.b.S2 Working hours (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_b_S2_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_b_S2_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023787,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.1.S1 Living wage (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_1_S1_Living_wage_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.1.S1 Living wage (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a time-bound target for paying all workers a living wage or does the company indicate that it pays all workers a living wage AND does the company describe how it determines a living wage for the regions where it operates, which includes the involvement of relevant trade unions (or equivalent worker bodies where the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining is restricted under law)? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Pays living wage or sets time-bound target",
        "Describes how living wage determined",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.1.S1 Living wage (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_1_S1_Living_wage_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_1_S1_Living_wage_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023802,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.1.S2 Living wage (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_1_S2_Living_wage_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.1.S2 Living wage (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it pays a living wage AND does the company indicate that it regularly reviews its definition of the living wage including with relevant trade unions (or equivalent worker bodies where the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining is restricted under law)? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Achieved paying living wage",
        "Reviews definition living wage with unions",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.1.S2 Living wage (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 56,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 56,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_1_S2_Living_wage_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_1_S2_Living_wage_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023814,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.2.S1 Transparency and accountability (in own extractive\noperations, which includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_2_S1_Transparency_and_accountability_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.2.S1 Transparency and accountability (in own extractive\noperations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": "Is the company a member of the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI) OR does the company publicly report, by country, the taxes and revenue payments to some countries beyond legal requirements for disclosure?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.2.S1 Transparency and accountability (in own extractive\noperations, which includes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 56,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 56,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_2_S1_Transparency_and_accountability_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_2_S1_Transparency_and_accountability_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023825,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.2.S2 Transparency and accountability (in own extractive\noperations, which includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_2_S2_Transparency_and_accountability_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.2.S2 Transparency and accountability (in own extractive\noperations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": "Does the company also publicly report, by country, taxes and revenue payments to ALL countries where it operates OR if the company operates in a non-EITI member country, does it describe the steps taken to be active participants in the process to promote transparency around revenue and tax payments and licensing/contracting/agreements or to becoming a member of EITI OR does it provide an example of public disclosure of contracts/agreements/licenses that provide the terms attached to the exploitation of oil, gas or minerals, in countries for which there are no such disclosure requirements? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.2.S2 Transparency and accountability (in own extractive\noperations, which includes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_2_S2_Transparency_and_accountability_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_2_S2_Transparency_and_accountability_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023836,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.3.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own\nextractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_3_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.3.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own\nextractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": "Does the company put in place measures to prohibit any form of intimidation, harassment, retaliation or violence against workers seeking to exercise the right to form and join a trade union of their choice (or equivalent worker bodies where the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining is restricted under law) OR does the company disclose the proportion of its total direct operations workforce covered by collective bargaining agreements? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.3.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own\nextractive operations, which includes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_3_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_3_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023847,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.3.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own\nextractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_3_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.3.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own\nextractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": "Does the company meet both of the requirements under Score 1? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.3.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own\nextractive operations, which includes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_3_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_3_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023861,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.4.S1 Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational\ndisease rates (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_4_S1_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.4.S1 Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational\ndisease rates (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "question": "Does the company describe the process(es) it has in place to identify its health and safety risks and impacts AND does the company disclose quantitative information on health and safety for its workers related to injury rates or lost days (or near miss frequency rate) for the last reporting period AND does the company disclose fatalities for the last reporting AND does the company disclose occupational disease rates for the last reporting period? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes process to identify H&S risks and impacts",
        "Discloses injury rate or lost days for last reporting period",
        "Discloses fatalities for last reporting period",
        "Discloses occupational disease rate for last reporting period",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_4_S1_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_4_S1_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023873,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.4.S2 Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational\ndisease rates (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_4_S2_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.4.S2 Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational\ndisease rates (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "question": "does the company also set targets related to injury rates or lost days (or near miss frequency rate) and fatalities and occupational disease rates for the last reporting period AND did it meet those targets or explain why these were not met or how it works to improve its health and safety management systems?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Set targets for H&S performance",
        "Met targets or explains why not or actions to improve H&S management systems",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.4.S2 Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational\ndisease rates (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_4_S2_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_4_S2_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023885,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.5.S1 Indigenous peoples’ rights and free prior and informed\nconsent (FPIC) (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_5_S1_Indigenous_peoples_rights_and_free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.5.S1 Indigenous peoples’ rights and free prior and informed\nconsent (FPIC) (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "question": "Where operations or proposed operations may impact indigenous peoples, does the company describe its process to identify and recognise affected indigenous peoples AND does it describe how it engages directly with indigenous community(ies) in carrying out the assessment? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Process to identify/recognise indigenous rights holders",
        "Describes how indigenous communities are engage during assessment",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.5.S1 Indigenous peoples’ rights and free prior and informed\nconsent (FPIC) (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_5_S1_Indigenous_peoples_rights_and_free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_5_S1_Indigenous_peoples_rights_and_free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023897,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.5.S2 Indigenous peoples’ rights and free prior and informed\nconsent (FPIC) (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_5_S2_Indigenous_peoples_rights_and_free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.5.S2 Indigenous peoples’ rights and free prior and informed\nconsent (FPIC) (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "question": "Does the company also indicate it is committed to free prior and informed consent (FPIC) AND does the company provide the most recent example where it has obtained free prior and informed consent (FPIC) or where it decided not to pursue the land or resources impacting on indigenous peoples?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Commitment to FPIC",
        "Recent example of obtaining FPIC or not pursuing indigenous people's land/resources",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.5.S2 Indigenous peoples’ rights and free prior and informed\nconsent (FPIC) (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_5_S2_Indigenous_peoples_rights_and_free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_5_S2_Indigenous_peoples_rights_and_free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023912,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.6.S1 Land rights: Land acquisition (in own extractive operations,\nwhich includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_6_S1_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.6.S1 Land rights: Land acquisition (in own extractive operations,\nwhich includes JVs)",
      "question": "When acquiring, leasing or making other arrangements to use or restrict the use of or access to land or natural resources, does the company describes how it identifies legitimate tenure rights holders, including through engagement with the affected or potentially affected communities in the process, with particular attention to vulnerable or marginalised tenure rights holders and negotiates with them to provide adequate compensation or requested alternatives to financial compensation?\n\nIF the company has not engaged in any land transactions in the past two years, does it describes its approach to identifying legitimate tenure rights holders generally? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.6.S1 Land rights: Land acquisition (in own extractive operations,\nwhich includes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_6_S1_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_6_S1_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023923,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.6.S2 Land rights: Land acquisition (in own extractive operations,\nwhich includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_6_S2_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.6.S2 Land rights: Land acquisition (in own extractive operations,\nwhich includes JVs)",
      "question": "For any new or ongoing land resettlements, does the company also describe how it provides financial compensation or other compensation alternatives, including its valuation methods and how legitimate tenure rights holders were involved in determining the valuation AND if a state has been involved in the transaction, does the company follow IFC Performance Standard 5 on Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement and describes the steps it has taken to meet the standards with respect to legitimate tenure rights holders?\n\nIF the company has not engaged in any land transactions in the past two years, does it describes its approach in relation to all elements above? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes approach to compensation including valuation",
        "Describes steps to meet IFC PS 5 in state deals",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.6.S2 Land rights: Land acquisition (in own extractive operations,\nwhich includes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_6_S2_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_6_S2_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023934,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.7.S1 Security (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_7_S1_Security_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.7.S1 Security (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": "does the company describe how it implements its security approach (including implementing its commitment to the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights or the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Providers) and provide an example of how it ensures respect for human rights (including the human rights of people in local communities) in the course of maintaining the security of company-managed operations, including when working with contracted private or public security providers, if applicable AND does the company describe how it ensures its business partners, including joint ventures, implement an equivalent approach to security management that ensures respect for human rights? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes security implementation (incl. VPs or ICOC) and provides an example",
        "Ensures Business Partners/JVs follow security approach",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.7.S1 Security (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_7_S1_Security_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_7_S1_Security_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023945,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.7.S2 Security (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_7_S2_Security_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.7.S2 Security (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": "Does the company also provide evidence that its security and human rights assessments include inputs from the local community, including about their security concerns AND does the company provide two examples of working with community members to improve security or prevent or address tensions related to its operations? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Security and HRs assessment includes input from local communities",
        "Two examples of working with local communities to improve security",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.7.S2 Security (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_7_S2_Security_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_7_S2_Security_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023956,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.8.S1 Water and sanitation (in own extractive operations, which\nincludes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_8_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.8.S1 Water and sanitation (in own extractive operations, which\nincludes JVs)",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it implements preventive and corrective action plans for identified specific risks to the right to water and sanitation in its own operations? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.8.S1 Water and sanitation (in own extractive operations, which\nincludes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_8_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_8_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023967,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.8.S2 Water and sanitation (in own extractive operations, which\nincludes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_8_S2_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.8.S2 Water and sanitation (in own extractive operations, which\nincludes JVs)",
      "question": "Does the company also set specific targets on water stewardship that take into consideration water use by local communities and other users in the vicinity of its operations AND does the company report on its progress in meeting targets, including an analysis of trends demonstrating progress?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Sets targets on water stewardship that consider water use by local communities",
        "Reports progress in meeting targets and trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.8.S2 Water and sanitation (in own extractive operations, which\nincludes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_8_S2_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_8_S2_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023978,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.9.S1 Women’s rights (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_9_S1_Women_s_rights_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.9.S1 Women’s rights (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "question": "Does the company describe its process(es) to prohibit and address harassment, intimidation and violence against women OR does the company describe how it takes into account differential impacts on women and men of working conditions, including to reproductive health AND does the company describe how it measures and takes steps to address any gender pay gap throughout all levels of employment? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes processes to stop harassment and violence against women OR Working conditions take into account gender issues",
        "Measures and steps to address gender pay gap at all levels of employment",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.9.S1 Women’s rights (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_9_S1_Women_s_rights_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_9_S1_Women_s_rights_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18023992,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.9.S2 Women’s rights (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_9_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.9.S2 Women’s rights (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "question": "Does the company meet all of the requirements under Score 1 AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress on closing any gender pay gap? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Meets all requirements under score 1",
        "Provides analysis of trends demonstrating closing gender pay gap",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_9_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_9_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024003,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.1.b.S1 Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_1_b_S1_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.1.b.S1 Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a timebound target for requiring its suppliers to pay all workers a living wage or does the company include requirements to pay workers a living wage in its contractual arrangements with its suppliers or its supplier code of conduct AND does the company describe how it works to support the payment of a living wage by its suppliers? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on living wage in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Describes work with suppliers on living wage",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.1.b.S1 Living wage (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_1_b_S1_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_1_b_S1_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024014,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.1.b.S2 Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_1_b_S2_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.1.b.S2 Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) payment below living wages in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress?  ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment of scope of payment below living wage in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.1.b.S2 Living wage (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_1_b_S2_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_1_b_S2_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024025,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.2.S1 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_2_S1_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.2.S1 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "question": "Does the company describe the practices it adopts to avoid price or short notice requirements or other business considerations undermining human rights OR does the company describe the practices it adopts to pay suppliers in line with the agreed timeframe(s) and for the amount(s) agreed in the payment terms AND does the company review its own operations to mitigate the negative impacts of its purchasing practices in planning, merchandising and costing? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes practices to avoid price or short notice requirements that undermine HRs OR Describes practices to pay suppliers in line with agreed timeframes",
        "Reviews own operations to mitigate negative impact of purchasing practices",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.2.S1 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_2_S1_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_2_S1_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024036,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "question": "Does the company meet all of the requirements under Score 1 AND does the company provide an example of how it assessed, addressed, and made changes to its purchasing practices to avoid undermining its human rights commitments?  ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Meets all requirements under score 1",
        "Example of assessing and changing of purchasing practices",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024047,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.3.S1 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_3_S1_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.3.S1 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it identifies its suppliers, including direct and indirect suppliers? \n\nThis needs to include the product source (eg farm, fishery, factories, manufacturing sites for components, mills, etc).",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.3.S1 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_3_S1_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_3_S1_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024061,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.3.S2 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_3_S2_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.3.S2 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "question": "Does the company also disclose the names and specific locations of the direct and indirect suppliers who make up the most significant parts of its supply chain and explain how it has defined what are the most significant parts of its supply chain AND does the company disclose which direct or indirect suppliers it considers to be involved in higher-risk activities, geographies, and products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Discloses names and locations of significant parts of supply chain and how significance was defined",
        "Discloses direct or indirect suppliers involved in higher-risk activities",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.3.S2 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_3_S2_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_3_S2_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024072,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.4.b.S1 Age verification and corrective actions\n (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_4_b_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.4.b.S1 Age verification and corrective actions\n (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements with its suppliers or supplier code of conduct, does the company include child labour requirements, including a prohibition on using child labour, verifying the age of workers recruited, and remediation programmes AND does the company describe how it works with suppliers to eliminate child labour and to improve working conditions for young workers where relevant? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on child labour in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Describes work with suppliers on eliminating child labour",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.4.b.S1 Age verification and corrective actions\n (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_4_b_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_4_b_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024084,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.4.b.S2 Age verification and corrective actions\n (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_4_b_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.4.b.S2 Age verification and corrective actions\n (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) child labour in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment of scope of child labour in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.4.b.S2 Age verification and corrective actions\n (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_4_b_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_4_b_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024096,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.b.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_b_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.5.b.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements or supplier code of conduct, does the company prohibit suppliers and any third-party recruitment intermediaries from imposing financial burdens on job seekers and workers by collecting recruitment fees or related costs AND does the company describe how it works with suppliers to eliminate recruitment fees and related costs, including by ensuring full reimbursement to workers where relevant?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on debt/fees in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Describes work with suppliers on debt/fees for job seekers/workers",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.b.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_b_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_b_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024108,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.b.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_b_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.5.b.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) the payment of recruitment fees or related costs in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment scope of payment of recruitment fees in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.b.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_b_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_b_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024120,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.d.S1 Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_d_S1_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.5.d.S1 Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements with suppliers or supplier code of conduct, does the company require the suppliers to pay workers directly, in full and on time AND does the company describe how it works with the supply chain to pay workers regularly, in full and on time? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on paying in full and on time in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Describes work with suppliers on paying workers regularly in full and on time",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.d.S1 Wage practices (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_d_S1_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_d_S1_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024135,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.d.S2 Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_d_S2_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.5.d.S2 Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) failure to pay directly, in full and on time in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment scope of failure to pay workers in full and on time in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.d.S2 Wage practices (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_d_S2_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_d_S2_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024147,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.f.S1 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_f_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.5.f.S1 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements or within its supplier code of conduct does the company prohibit suppliers from retaining workers’ personal documents or restricting workers’ freedom of movement or requiring workers to use company provided accommodation AND does the company describe how it works with suppliers to eliminate the retention of worker’s documents or other actions to physically restrict movement? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on free movement in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Describes working with suppliers on free movement of workers",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.f.S1 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_f_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_f_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024159,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.f.S2 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_f_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.5.f.S2 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) retaining documents or restricting movement in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment of scope of restriction of movement in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.f.S2 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_f_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_f_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024171,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.6.b.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_6_b_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.6.b.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements with its suppliers or supplier code of conduct, does the company require respect for the right of all workers to form and join a trade union of their choice (or equivalent worker bodies where the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining is restricted under law) and to bargain collectively and prohibiting intimidation, harassment, retaliation and violence against trade union members and trade union representatives AND does the company describe how it works to support the practices of its suppliers in relation to freedom of association and collective bargaining?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on FoA/CB in suppliers codes and contracts",
        "Describes work with suppliers on FoA/CB",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.6.b.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_6_b_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_6_b_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024182,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.6.b.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_6_b_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.6.b.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) restrictions to freedom of association or collective bargaining in its supply chain  \nAND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment of scope of restriction of FoA/CB in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.6.b.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_6_b_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_6_b_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024193,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates\n (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates\n (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements with suppliers or supplier code of conduct, does the company set out clear health and safety requirements AND does the company disclose quantitative information on health and safety for workers at suppliers related to injury rates or lost days (or near miss frequency rate) for the last reporting period AND does the company disclose fatalities for the last reporting period AND does the company disclose occupational disease rates for the last reporting period?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on H&S in supplier codes and contracts",
        "Discloses injury rate or lost days in supply chain in last reporting period",
        "Discloses fatalities for workers in supply chain in last reporting period",
        "Discloses occupational disease rate in supply chain in last reporting period",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024205,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates\n (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates\n (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company also describe how it works with its supply chain to improve its practices in relation to health and safety AND does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) health and safety issues in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes work with suppliers of H&S",
        "Assessment of scope of H&S issues in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024217,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.8.b.S1 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_8_b_S1_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.8.b.S1 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements with suppliers or supplier code of conduct, does the company require suppliers to provide equal pay for equal work, introduce measures to ensure equal opportunities throughout all levels of employment and eliminate health and safety concerns that are particularly prevalent among women workers AND does the company work with suppliers to improve their practices in relation to women’s rights? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on women's rights in contracts/codes with suppliers",
        "Describes work with suppliers on women's rights",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.8.b.S1 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_8_b_S1_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_8_b_S1_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024232,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.8.b.S2 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_8_b_S2_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.8.b.S2 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) discrimination or unsafe working conditions for women in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assessment of scope of women's rights issues in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.8.b.S2 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_8_b_S2_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_8_b_S2_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024244,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.9.b.S1 Working hours (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_9_b_S1_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.9.b.S1 Working hours (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements with suppliers or supplier code of conduct, does the company require suppliers to respect applicable international standards concerning maximum hours and minimum breaks and rest periods AND does the company describe how it works with suppliers to improve their practices in relation to working hours? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirements on working hours in codes/contracts with suppliers",
        "Describes work with suppliers on working hours",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.9.b.S1 Working hours (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_9_b_S1_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_9_b_S1_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024255,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.9.b.S2 Working hours (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_9_b_S2_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.9.b.S2 Working hours (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "Does the company provide its assessment of the number affected by (scope of) excessive working hours in its supply chain AND does the company provide an analysis of trends demonstrating progress? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Assesment of scope of excessive working hours in supply chain",
        "Analysis of trends demonstrating progress",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.9.b.S2 Working hours (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_9_b_S2_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_9_b_S2_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024266,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.a.S1 Arrangements with suppliers and smelters/refiners\n in the mineral resource supply chains",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_a_S1_Arrangements_with_suppliers_and_smelters_refiners_in_the_mineral_resource_supply_chains.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.10.a.S1 Arrangements with suppliers and smelters/refiners\n in the mineral resource supply chains",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it incorporates into commercial contracts/written agreements with suppliers’ requirements to conduct due diligence in accordance with the OECD Guidance for at least 3TG AND does the company describe how it works with smelters/refiners and with suppliers to contribute to building their capacity in risk assessment and improving their due diligence performance (including through industry-wide initiatives)? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirement on OECD Guidance aligned due diligence in contracts/codes with suppliers",
        "Describes work with smelters/refiners and suppliers on due diligence",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.a.S1 Arrangements with suppliers and smelters/refiners\n in the mineral resource supply chains+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_a_S1_Arrangements_with_suppliers_and_smelters_refiners_in_the_mineral_resource_supply_chains+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_a_S1_Arrangements_with_suppliers_and_smelters_refiners_in_the_mineral_resource_supply_chains+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024277,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.a.S2 Arrangements with suppliers and smelters/refiners\n in the mineral resource supply chains",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_a_S2_Arrangements_with_suppliers_and_smelters_refiners_in_the_mineral_resource_supply_chains.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.10.a.S2 Arrangements with suppliers and smelters/refiners\n in the mineral resource supply chains",
      "question": "Does the company also indicate that it incorporates into commercial contracts/written agreements with suppliers’ requirements to disclose to the company (as necessary on a confidential basis) updated smelter/refiner information for any 3TG mineral used in the production of its parts, materials, components and products  \nAND does the company indicate that these requirements cover all minerals? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Requirement to disclose smelter/refiner information in contracts/codes with suppliers",
        "Requirement on suppliers covers all minerals",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.a.S2 Arrangements with suppliers and smelters/refiners\n in the mineral resource supply chains+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_a_S2_Arrangements_with_suppliers_and_smelters_refiners_in_the_mineral_resource_supply_chains+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_a_S2_Arrangements_with_suppliers_and_smelters_refiners_in_the_mineral_resource_supply_chains+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024288,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.b.S1 Risk identification and responses in mineral supply\n chains",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_b_S1_Risk_identification_and_responses_in_mineral_supply_chains.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.10.b.S1 Risk identification and responses in mineral supply\n chains",
      "question": "Does the company describe its processes for identifying and prioritising risks and impacts in its supply chain as set out in the OECD Guidance and disclose the risks identified with respect to at least 3TG AND does the company describe its processes to identify the smelters/refiners in its supply chain and assess whether the smelters/refiners have carried out due diligence processes in accordance with the OECD Guidance with respect to at least 3TG? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes risk identification and disclosure in line with OECD Guidance",
        "Describes process to identify smelters/refiners",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.b.S1 Risk identification and responses in mineral supply\n chains+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_b_S1_Risk_identification_and_responses_in_mineral_supply_chains+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_b_S1_Risk_identification_and_responses_in_mineral_supply_chains+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024299,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.b.S2 Risk identification and responses in mineral supply\n chains",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_b_S2_Risk_identification_and_responses_in_mineral_supply_chains.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.10.b.S2 Risk identification and responses in mineral supply\n chains",
      "question": "Does the company also publicly disclose the list of all the qualified smelters/refiners in its supply chain that it has independently judged to conform to the due diligence processes set out in the OECD Guidance with respect to at least 3TG AND does the company indicate that the risk identification processes and disclosures cover all minerals? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Discloses smelters/refiners assessed in line with OECD Guidance",
        "Risk identification and disclosure covers all minerals",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.b.S2 Risk identification and responses in mineral supply\n chains+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_b_S2_Risk_identification_and_responses_in_mineral_supply_chains+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_b_S2_Risk_identification_and_responses_in_mineral_supply_chains+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024310,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.c.S1 Reporting on responsible sourcing of minerals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_c_S1_Reporting_on_responsible_sourcing_of_minerals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.10.c.S1 Reporting on responsible sourcing of minerals",
      "question": "Does the company describe the steps taken to manage and respond to risks in its mineral supply chain (which could include a summary of the risk management plan) with respect to at least 3TG AND the company describe the processes to monitor/track the performance of risk prevention/mitigation measures AND does the company describe the processes to monitor/track performance of risk prevention/mitigation measures AND does the company disclose whether there has been significant improvement in risk prevention/mitigation over time with respect to at least 3TG?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes risk management system for supply chain",
        "Describes process of monitoring risk prevention/mitigation system",
        "Discloses improvements in risk prevention/mitigation system",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_c_S1_Reporting_on_responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_c_S1_Reporting_on_responsible_sourcing_of_minerals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18024321,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.c.S2 Reporting on responsible sourcing of minerals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_c_S2_Reporting_on_responsible_sourcing_of_minerals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.10.c.S2 Reporting on responsible sourcing of minerals",
      "question": "Does the company also describe how it engages with suppliers and affected stakeholders to agree on its strategy for risk management AND does the company indicate that these risk management and response processes cover all minerals? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nPerformance: Company human rights practices<br>\n<br>\nWhat do the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<br>\nexpect?<br>\n<br>\n• Guiding Principle 14 asserts that businesses should have policies and processes in place that are proportionate to factors including size, sector, operational context, business structure, and the severity of the business' adverse human rights impacts.<br>\n• The commentary to Guiding Principle 14 states ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’.<br>\n• The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles elaborates further on ‘severity’, noting that the gravity of the impact (its scale) and the number of individuals that are or will be affected (its scope) and irremediability meaning any limits on the ability to restore those affected to a situation at least the same as, or equivalent to, their situation before the adverse impact are relevant factors in determining severity.<br>\n<br>\nWhy is this important?<br>\n<br>\n• Key sector risks are risks commonly regarded as potentially severe or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant.<br>\n• For businesses to effectively manage these key sector risks, identified by the gravity of their impact (scale) and irremediability, its important they first understand and can articulate the scope of the problem(s) being faced.<br>\n• As such, several indicators in Measurement Theme D require companies to demonstrate their understanding of key risks by providing an assessment of the number of individuals that are or will be affected (scope) within their sector.",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company’s website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring:<br>\n<br>\nMost CHRB indicators operate using '<strong>OR</strong>' and '<strong>AND</strong>' rules. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>AND</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete both or all of the options listed in order to obtain a full point but they can score half points if they meet at least one of the requirements. Where two or more requirements are separated by '<strong>OR</strong>', companies being benchmarked are required to complete one of the options listed.",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Describes engagement with suppliers/stakeholders on risk management strategy",
        "Risk management and response processes cover all minerals",
        "None of the above"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.c.S2 Reporting on responsible sourcing of minerals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_c_S2_Reporting_on_responsible_sourcing_of_minerals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_c_S2_Reporting_on_responsible_sourcing_of_minerals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18036897,
      "name": "Draft+Gender Career Growth Parity Index",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Gender_Career_Growth_Parity_Index.json",
      "designer": "Draft",
      "title": "Gender Career Growth Parity Index",
      "question": "What is the Gender Career Growth Parity Index in a company?\r\n\r\nThe Gender Career Growth Parity Index takes into account equal pay, equal hours of training and equal entitlement to parental leave between Female and Male.",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Parental Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  ((100 - Math.abs(100 - female_pay)) + (100 - (100 * Math.abs(training_female - training_male) / training_total)) + ((parental_leave / employees) * 100)) / 3;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~3447767",
          "name": "female_pay"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~837335",
          "name": "training_female"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~837376",
          "name": "training_male"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~837320",
          "name": "training_total"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~2311236",
          "name": "parental_leave"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~836097",
          "name": "employees"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 49,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 36,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Gender_Career_Growth_Parity_Index+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18037020,
      "name": "Draft+Increased temporary employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Increased_temporary_employees.json",
      "designer": "Draft",
      "title": "Increased temporary employees",
      "question": "Has a company had a decrease in permanent employees and an increase in temporary employees compared with the year before?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Temporary Work",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (temporary >= temporary_previous && permanent <= permanent_previous) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~836163",
          "name": "temporary"
        },
        {
          "year": "-1",
          "metric": "~836163",
          "name": "temporary_previous"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~836128",
          "name": "permanent"
        },
        {
          "year": "-1",
          "metric": "~836128",
          "name": "permanent_previous"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 850,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 343,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Increased_temporary_employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18037041,
      "name": "Draft+Increase in temporary workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Increase_in_temporary_workers.json",
      "designer": "Draft",
      "title": "Increase in temporary workers",
      "question": "Has a company had an increase in the number of temporary employees in comparison to the year before?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Temporary Work",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (temporary > temporary_previous) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~836163",
          "name": "temporary"
        },
        {
          "year": "-1",
          "metric": "~836163",
          "name": "temporary_previous"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 932,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 383,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Increase_in_temporary_workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18037080,
      "name": "Draft+Yearly change temporary workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Yearly_change_temporary_workers.json",
      "designer": "Draft",
      "title": "Yearly change temporary workers",
      "question": "Has the number of temporary employees changed compared with the year before?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Temporary Work",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  t1 - t2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~836163",
          "name": "t1"
        },
        {
          "year": "-1",
          "metric": "~836163",
          "name": "t2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 932,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 383,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Yearly_change_temporary_workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18037114,
      "name": "Draft+CEO gender average",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+CEO_gender_average.json",
      "designer": "Draft",
      "title": "CEO gender average",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+CEO_gender_average+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18037124,
      "name": "morespecificSylvia+Fatalities and injuries, no change",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/morespecificSylvia+Fatalities_and_injuries_no_change.json",
      "designer": "morespecificSylvia",
      "title": "Fatalities and injuries, no change",
      "question": "Have the number of fatalities and injuries both decreased or remained the same compared with the previous year?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (Fatality <= Fatality_previous && Injury <= Injury_previous) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~815203",
          "name": "Fatality"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "no_result",
          "metric": "~836080",
          "name": "Injury"
        },
        {
          "year": "-1",
          "metric": "~815203",
          "name": "Fatality_previous"
        },
        {
          "year": "-1",
          "metric": "~836080",
          "name": "Injury_previous"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 245,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 152,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/morespecificSylvia+Fatalities_and_injuries_no_change+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18037139,
      "name": "Draft+Gender Balance Index V2",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Gender_Balance_Index_V2.json",
      "designer": "Draft",
      "title": "Gender Balance Index V2",
      "question": "What is the Gender Balance Index in a company?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  100 - Math.abs(((female_employees / employees) * 100) - 50);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~836097",
          "name": "employees"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~837241",
          "name": "female_employees"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3558,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1752,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Draft+Gender_Balance_Index_V2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18038985,
      "name": "Commons+electronics supplied by",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+electronics_supplied_by.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "electronics supplied by",
      "question": "What companies supply electronics to this company?",
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Tier 0 Supplier",
        "Tier 1 Supplier",
        "Tier 2 Supplier",
        "Tier 3 Supplier"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+electronics_supplied_by+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18038996,
      "name": "Commons+electronics supplier of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+electronics_supplier_of.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "electronics supplier of",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2823,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+electronics_supplier_of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18046378,
      "name": "Australian Government Clean Energy Regulator+Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) Scope 1",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Australian_Government_Clean_Energy_Regulator+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_GHG_Scope_1.json",
      "designer": "Australian Government Clean Energy Regulator",
      "title": "Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) Scope 1",
      "question": "How many tonnes CO2-e of Scope 1 GHG Emissions has the company produced as reported on the Australian Government Clean Energy Regulator?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Corporations registered under the  [[https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2014C00813|National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 (NGER Act)]] must report their greenhouse gas emissions, and energy production and consumption to the Clean Energy Regulator (CER), by 31 October each year.</p>\r\n<p>By 28 February the following ​year, the CER is required to publish a point-in-time extract of  [[https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/NGER/About-the-National-Greenhouse-and-Energy-Reporting-scheme/Greenhouse-gases-and-energy|reported scope 1 and scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions]] in addition to net energy consumption for each corporation that exceeds the [[https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/NGER/National%20greenhouse%20and%20energy%20reporting%20data/What-data-is-published-and-why|publication threshold]].</p>\r\n<h4>Comparing published data between years</h4>\r\n<p>When comparing total emissions between reporting years, it is important to note that each year there may be minor changes to the [[https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/NGER/Legislation/Measurement-Determination|N​ational Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Determination 2008]], and in the number of reporters and facilities that meet the [[https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/NGER/Reporting-cycle/Assess-your-obligations/Reporting-thresholds|publication and reporting threshold]].</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The Australian Government Clean Energy Regulator take all reasonable efforts to ensure the information published on their website is accurate at the time of publication.</p>\r\n<p>Comparison of total emissions between reporting years may be affected by minor changes to the [[https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/NGER/Pages/Legislation/Measurement-Determination.aspx|National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Determination 2008 ]] and the number of reporters and facilities that meet a threshold</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Energy-related dataset",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "t CO2-e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4383,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 576,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Scope_1_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Australian_Government_Clean_Energy_Regulator+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_GHG_Scope_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18046402,
      "name": "Australian Government Clean Energy Regulator+Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) Scope 2",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Australian_Government_Clean_Energy_Regulator+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_GHG_Scope_2.json",
      "designer": "Australian Government Clean Energy Regulator",
      "title": "Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) Scope 2",
      "question": "How many tonnes CO2-e of Scope 2 GHG Emissions has the company produced as reported on the Australian Government Clean Energy Regulator?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Corporations registered under the  <a href=\"https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2014C00813\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 (NGER Act)</a> must report their greenhouse gas emissions, and energy production and consumption to the Clean Energy Regulator (CER), by 31 October each year.</p>\r\n<p>By 28 February the following ​year, the CER is required to publish a point-in-time extract of  <a href=\"https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/NGER/About-the-National-Greenhouse-and-Energy-Reporting-scheme/Greenhouse-gases-and-energy\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">reported scope 1 and scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions</a> in addition to net energy consumption for each corporation that exceeds the <a href=\"https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/NGER/National%20greenhouse%20and%20energy%20reporting%20data/What-data-is-published-and-why\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">publication threshold</a>.</p>\r\n<h4>Comparing published data between years</h4>\r\n<p>When comparing total emissions between reporting years, it is important to note that each year there may be minor changes to the <a href=\"https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/NGER/Legislation/Measurement-Determination\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">N​ational Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Determination 2008</a>, and in the number of reporters and facilities that meet the <a href=\"https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/NGER/Reporting-cycle/Assess-your-obligations/Reporting-thresholds\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">publication and reporting threshold</a>.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The Australian Government Clean Energy Regulator take all reasonable efforts to ensure the information published on their website is accurate at the time of publication.</p>\r\n<p>Comparison of total emissions between reporting years may be affected by minor changes to the <a href=\"https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/NGER/Pages/Legislation/Measurement-Determination.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Determination 2008</a> and the number of reporters and facilities that meet a threshold.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Energy-related dataset",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "t CO2-e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4381,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 576,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Scope_2_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Australian_Government_Clean_Energy_Regulator+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_GHG_Scope_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18046419,
      "name": "Australian Government Clean Energy Regulator+Net energy consumed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Australian_Government_Clean_Energy_Regulator+Net_energy_consumed.json",
      "designer": "Australian Government Clean Energy Regulator",
      "title": "Net energy consumed",
      "question": "How much energy, measured in gigajoules (GJ), is utilized or consumed by the company, as reported on the Australian Government Clean Energy Regulator?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Corporations registered under the  <a href=\"https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2014C00813\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 (NGER Act)</a> must report their greenhouse gas emissions, and energy production and consumption to the Clean Energy Regulator (CER), by 31 October each year.</p>\r\n<p>By 28 February the following ​year, the CER is required to publish a point-in-time extract of  <a href=\"https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/NGER/About-the-National-Greenhouse-and-Energy-Reporting-scheme/Greenhouse-gases-and-energy\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">reported scope 1 and scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions</a> in addition to net energy consumption for each corporation that exceeds the <a href=\"https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/NGER/National%20greenhouse%20and%20energy%20reporting%20data/What-data-is-published-and-why\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">publication threshold</a>.</p>\r\n<h4>Comparing published data between years</h4>\r\n<p>When comparing total emissions between reporting years, it is important to note that each year there may be minor changes to the <a href=\"https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/NGER/Legislation/Measurement-Determination\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">N​ational Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Determination 2008</a>, and in the number of reporters and facilities that meet the <a href=\"https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/NGER/Reporting-cycle/Assess-your-obligations/Reporting-thresholds\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">publication and reporting threshold</a>.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The Australian Government Clean Energy Regulator take all reasonable efforts to ensure the information published on their website is accurate at the time of publication.</p>\r\n<p>Comparison of total emissions between reporting years may be affected by minor changes to the <a href=\"https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/NGER/Pages/Legislation/Measurement-Determination.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"transition-property: all;\">National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Determination 2008</a> and the number of reporters and facilities that meet a threshold.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Energy-related dataset",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "gigajoules",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4383,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 576,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Energy_Consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Australian_Government_Clean_Energy_Regulator+Net_energy_consumed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113424,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A01.EA Sustainability Strategy Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A01_EA_Sustainability_Strategy_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A01.EA Sustainability Strategy Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its process for identifying and prioritizing its most relevant sustainability impacts as well as the outcome of this process, in relation to its sustainability strategy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company has sustainability objectives and targets embedded in its strategy and business model.</p><p>Rationale: A corporate sustainability strategy prioritizes and embeds sustainability objectives and targets and helps the company to deliver on key Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It facilitates the company's ability to adapt and change through forward planning, increasing its resilience, managing risks and protecting workers, the company and society at large.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric, the company needs to have a regular exercise at least every 2-3 years. The company needs to disclose a process which meets double materiality. The assessment must have involved external stakeholders, for example, through surveys or interviews. The company must report its environmental and social impact, instead of only taking a risk approach/assessment. It must also provide a list of the most relevant sustainability topics based on the process. </p><p>Keywords: Materiality matrix, assessment, creation of value map.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Materiality Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A01_Sustainability_Strategy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A01_EA_Sustainability_Strategy_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113436,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A01.EB Sustainability Strategy Coverage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A01_EB_Sustainability_Strategy_Coverage.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A01.EB Sustainability Strategy Coverage",
      "question": "Does the company have a sustainability strategy covering its most significant impacts and sustainability topics in relation to both its own operations and its value chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company has sustainability objectives and targets embedded in its strategy and business model.</p><p>Rationale: A corporate sustainability strategy prioritizes and embeds sustainability objectives and targets and helps the company to deliver on key Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It facilitates the company's ability to adapt and change through forward planning, increasing its resilience, managing risks and protecting workers, the company and society at large.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company needs to meet three criteria to score on this element: it must score in either the B1 or B2 indicators, in at least one of the indicators from B5 to B16, and in at least one of the indicators from C1 to C4.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A01_Sustainability_Strategy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A01_EB_Sustainability_Strategy_Coverage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113448,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A01.EC Group-Wide Sustainability Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A01_EC_Group_Wide_Sustainability_Strategy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A01.EC Group-Wide Sustainability Strategy",
      "question": "Does the company have group-wide targets on key sustainability topics for the most material parts of its value chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company has sustainability objectives and targets embedded in its strategy and business model.</p><p>Rationale: A corporate sustainability strategy prioritizes and embeds sustainability objectives and targets and helps the company to deliver on key Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It facilitates the company's ability to adapt and change through forward planning, increasing its resilience, managing risks and protecting workers, the company and society at large.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must have time-bound and measurable targets for at least six of the following key sustainability topics: </p><p>• biological alterations/interferences </p><p>• water use, water pollutants </p><p>• disturbances </p><p>• soil pollutants </p><p>• terrestrial ecosystem use </p><p>• solid waste </p><p>• marine ecosystem use </p><p>• non-GHG air pollutants </p><p>• freshwater ecosystem use </p><p>• GHG emissions </p><p>The key sustainability topics must cover the most material parts of the company's value chain, including their own operations, as well as upstream or downstream operations.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Materiality Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A01_Sustainability_Strategy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A01_EC_Group_Wide_Sustainability_Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113460,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A01.ED Sustainability Strategy Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A01_ED_Sustainability_Strategy_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A01.ED Sustainability Strategy Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report consistently against all its sustainability targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company has sustainability objectives and targets embedded in its strategy and business model.</p><p>Rationale: A corporate sustainability strategy prioritizes and embeds sustainability objectives and targets and helps the company to deliver on key Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It facilitates the company's ability to adapt and change through forward planning, increasing its resilience, managing risks and protecting workers, the company and society at large.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must report on all of the targets it has set. At least one of the targets must meet all of the three following conditions: it must be time-bound, it must reference a baseline year unless it is a target to 0%, 100% or absolute numbers, and the company must disclose performance on the target on the reporting year.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A01_Sustainability_Strategy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A01_ED_Sustainability_Strategy_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113472,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A02.EA Responsibility for Sustainable Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A02_EA_Responsibility_for_Sustainable_Strategy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A02.EA Responsibility for Sustainable Strategy",
      "question": "Does the company disclose having persons, teams or committees within the company who are responsible for the implementation of its sustainability strategy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company has a governance system that includes highest level responsibility and accountability for its sustainability objectives and targets. Senior executive members have incentives to reward the effective delivery of relevant company strategies and initiatives.</p><p>Rationale: Linking sustainable development objectives and targets to roles and remuneration is important to ensure the accountability of the company in relation to its contribution to sustainable development objectives and targets. Ensuring capability within decision-making bodies further indicates a company's commitment to transitioning to a sustainable future.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company needs to have a sustainability strategy that covers both nature and social aspects. Covering only one of the two aspects is not sufficient. In cases where the company does not have an explicit sustainability strategy, as long as it is acting on both environmental and social issues this is sufficient. the company must also disclose who is responsible for the implementation of this strategy. </p><p>Keywords: CSR Director, ESG Director, CSR Department, ESG Department, Sustainability Department, Sustainability Director, Sustainability Committee</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A02_Accountability_for_Sustainable_Strategy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A02_EA_Responsibility_for_Sustainable_Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113484,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A02.EB Accountability for Sustainable Strategy Assignation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A02_EB_Accountability_for_Sustainable_Strategy_Assignation.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A02.EB Accountability for Sustainable Strategy Assignation",
      "question": "Does the company provide evidence of assigning decision-making and oversight responsibility for its sustainability strategy to the highest governance body?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company has a governance system that includes highest level responsibility and accountability for its sustainability objectives and targets. Senior executive members have incentives to reward the effective delivery of relevant company strategies and initiatives.</p><p>Rationale: Linking sustainable development objectives and targets to roles and remuneration is important to ensure the accountability of the company in relation to its contribution to sustainable development objectives and targets. Ensuring capability within decision-making bodies further indicates a company's commitment to transitioning to a sustainable future.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric as a prerequisite to meet this element, the company must have met element a. It must then also attribute responsibility to the highest governance body. For example, it might describe that the Board reviews the sustainability strategy, or that a specific member of the Board is also the Chair of the Sustainability Committee. </p><p>Keywords: oversight, responsible</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A02_Accountability_for_Sustainable_Strategy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A02_EB_Accountability_for_Sustainable_Strategy_Assignation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113496,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A02.EC Accountability for Sustainable Strategy Remuneration",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A02_EC_Accountability_for_Sustainable_Strategy_Remuneration.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A02.EC Accountability for Sustainable Strategy Remuneration",
      "question": "Does the company provide evidence of linking performance criteria in senior executives' remuneration policies to its sustainability targets and objectives?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company has a governance system that includes highest level responsibility and accountability for its sustainability objectives and targets. Senior executive members have incentives to reward the effective delivery of relevant company strategies and initiatives.</p><p>Rationale: Linking sustainable development objectives and targets to roles and remuneration is important to ensure the accountability of the company in relation to its contribution to sustainable development objectives and targets. Ensuring capability within decision-making bodies further indicates a company's commitment to transitioning to a sustainable future.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must state that it links senior executives' remuneration to specific targets and objectives that cover both nature and social issues. Covering only one of the two aspects is not sufficient. The targets on which the remuneration depends must be explicitly stated. Topics related to nature include those covered by indicators B1 to B16. Social issues can include targets associated with diversity and inclusion, but do not include governance related topics such as corruption. The target should extend beyond the sales or revenues of a product, even if it is from a socially or environmentally focused product. </p><p>Keywords: LTIP (Long Term Incentive Plan), SHE, vesting</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A02_Accountability_for_Sustainable_Strategy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A02_EC_Accountability_for_Sustainable_Strategy_Remuneration+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113508,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A02.ED Accountability for Sustainable Strategy Evidence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A02_ED_Accountability_for_Sustainable_Strategy_Evidence.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A02.ED Accountability for Sustainable Strategy Evidence",
      "question": "Does the company provide evidence that its highest governance body has expertise with respect to the company's most material sustainability topics?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company has a governance system that includes highest level responsibility and accountability for its sustainability objectives and targets. Senior executive members have incentives to reward the effective delivery of relevant company strategies and initiatives.</p><p>Rationale: Linking sustainable development objectives and targets to roles and remuneration is important to ensure the accountability of the company in relation to its contribution to sustainable development objectives and targets. Ensuring capability within decision-making bodies further indicates a company's commitment to transitioning to a sustainable future.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric The expertise of the highest governance body must cover both nature and social aspects. The expertise must explicitly mention one of the following: academic or professional training, former experiences in specialized organizations, or proven technical knowledge. The conditions for this element can also be met in instances where companies describe that the highest governance body has direct access to expertise, such as a specialised committee composed of external experts for which a board member is the chairperson. In these cases it must be specified what the scope of the committee is and how often it meets. </p><p>Keywords: Competency matrix, board expertise, board biography</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Materiality Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A02_Accountability_for_Sustainable_Strategy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A02_ED_Accountability_for_Sustainable_Strategy_Evidence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113520,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A03.EA Stakeholder Engagement Issue Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_EA_Stakeholder_Engagement_Issue_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A03.EA Stakeholder Engagement Issue Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose an overview of the issues raised during its stakeholder engagement activities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company engages with stakeholders on sustainable development issues and incorporates the outcomes of these activities in its strategy and operations.</p><p>Rationale: Serving the interests of all stakeholders is key to businesses' long-term success. Regularly engaging with stakeholders contributes to the company's understanding of diverse and frequently opposing perspectives, drives innovation and helps to shape robust and inclusive approaches. Companies are expected to engage in meaningful stakeholder engagement. Engagement processes are expected to produce a clear output or action and an acknowledgment of how stakeholder inputs are used. </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company discloses the issues raised by stakeholders, and specifies what stakeholder group they correspond to. The list of issues should go beyond the materiality assessment.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_Stakeholder_Engagement.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_EA_Stakeholder_Engagement_Issue_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113532,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A03.EB Stakeholder Engagement Identification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_EB_Stakeholder_Engagement_Identification.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A03.EB Stakeholder Engagement Identification",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its process for identifying relevant stakeholders across its value chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company engages with stakeholders on sustainable development issues and incorporates the outcomes of these activities in its strategy and operations.</p><p>Rationale: Serving the interests of all stakeholders is key to businesses' long-term success. Regularly engaging with stakeholders contributes to the company's understanding of diverse and frequently opposing perspectives, drives innovation and helps to shape robust and inclusive approaches. Companies are expected to engage in meaningful stakeholder engagement. Engagement processes are expected to produce a clear output or action and an acknowledgment of how stakeholder inputs are used. </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company defines who they consider their stakeholder groups to be or how the company determined with which stakeholders to engage. A simple statement such as “based on their strategic importance to the company” or “based on its impact on our business” is sufficient.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_Stakeholder_Engagement.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_EB_Stakeholder_Engagement_Identification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113544,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A03.EC Stakeholder Engagement Process Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_EC_Stakeholder_Engagement_Process_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A03.EC Stakeholder Engagement Process Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its process for engaging with stakeholder groups, including frequency and channels, beyond its materiality assessment or a similar equivalent?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company engages with stakeholders on sustainable development issues and incorporates the outcomes of these activities in its strategy and operations.</p><p>Rationale: Serving the interests of all stakeholders is key to businesses' long-term success. Regularly engaging with stakeholders contributes to the company's understanding of diverse and frequently opposing perspectives, drives innovation and helps to shape robust and inclusive approaches. Companies are expected to engage in meaningful stakeholder engagement. Engagement processes are expected to produce a clear output or action and an acknowledgment of how stakeholder inputs are used. </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must disclose what channels it used to engage with the different stakeholder groups. It is insufficient for the company to specify a list of channels if they do not indicate how these correspond to each stakeholder group. the company must also state with what frequency it engages with stakeholders.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_Stakeholder_Engagement.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_EC_Stakeholder_Engagement_Process_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113556,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A03.ED Stakeholder Engagement Outcomes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_ED_Stakeholder_Engagement_Outcomes.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A03.ED Stakeholder Engagement Outcomes",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the outcomes of its stakeholder engagement activities and their integration into its sustainability strategy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company engages with stakeholders on sustainable development issues and incorporates the outcomes of these activities in its strategy and operations.</p><p>Rationale: Serving the interests of all stakeholders is key to businesses' long-term success. Regularly engaging with stakeholders contributes to the company's understanding of diverse and frequently opposing perspectives, drives innovation and helps to shape robust and inclusive approaches. Companies are expected to engage in meaningful stakeholder engagement. Engagement processes are expected to produce a clear output or action and an acknowledgment of how stakeholder inputs are used. </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company explains how it has responded to key issues raised by its stakeholders. the company must disclose specific and concrete outcomes based on the year's engagement. A general description of guidelines or a recap of the materiality assessment is insufficient.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_Stakeholder_Engagement.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_ED_Stakeholder_Engagement_Outcomes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113568,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A03.EE Stakeholder Engagement Coverage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_EE_Stakeholder_Engagement_Coverage.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A03.EE Stakeholder Engagement Coverage",
      "question": "Does the company's stakeholder engagement cover its most material sustainability topics?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company engages with stakeholders on sustainable development issues and incorporates the outcomes of these activities in its strategy and operations.</p><p>Rationale: Serving the interests of all stakeholders is key to businesses' long-term success. Regularly engaging with stakeholders contributes to the company's understanding of diverse and frequently opposing perspectives, drives innovation and helps to shape robust and inclusive approaches. Companies are expected to engage in meaningful stakeholder engagement. Engagement processes are expected to produce a clear output or action and an acknowledgment of how stakeholder inputs are used. </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric stakeholder engagement needs to cover both nature and social issues. The issues related to nature must go beyond GHG emissions and touch on aspects related to ecosystems or biodiversity. Social issues must go beyond safety, and include aspects such as diversity, inclusion, or women's representation.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_Stakeholder_Engagement.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_EE_Stakeholder_Engagement_Coverage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113580,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A04.EA Lobbying and Advocacy Trade Associations Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_EA_Lobbying_and_Advocacy_Trade_Associations_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A04.EA Lobbying and Advocacy Trade Associations Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a list of trade associations of which it is a member for all jurisdictions in which it operates?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company advocates nature-positive policies and regulations and discloses any misalignment with its lobbying activities as well as the measures it takes to address misalignment.</p><p>Rationale: Both individually and through trade associations, companies should advocate nature-positive policies and regulations. Companies should not finance trade associations that undermine nature-positive policies, including regarding the climate. Companies should conduct regular due diligence on the trade associations they support, and fully disclose the names of the associations, the alignment of their lobbying activities with policies and regulations that support nature-positive outcomes and their action plans to correct any misalignment.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company needs to disclose at least 5 trade/industry associations of which it is a member. Partnerships and other organisations other than trade or industry associations do not count.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_Lobbying_and_advocacy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_EA_Lobbying_and_Advocacy_Trade_Associations_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113592,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A04.EB Lobbying and Advocacy Assessment Framework",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_EB_Lobbying_and_Advocacy_Assessment_Framework.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A04.EB Lobbying and Advocacy Assessment Framework",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a clear and detailed framework for assessing the alignment of its trade associations with its sustainability targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company advocates nature-positive policies and regulations and discloses any misalignment with its lobbying activities as well as the measures it takes to address misalignment.</p><p>Rationale: Both individually and through trade associations, companies should advocate nature-positive policies and regulations. Companies should not finance trade associations that undermine nature-positive policies, including regarding the climate. Companies should conduct regular due diligence on the trade associations they support, and fully disclose the names of the associations, the alignment of their lobbying activities with policies and regulations that support nature-positive outcomes and their action plans to correct any misalignment.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must state a concrete framework that it uses to assess alignment with nature-positive policies. For issues related to climate a valid framework could be the Paris Agreement. For issues related to biodiversity, valid frameworks include policies and regulations that address any of the drivers of biodiversity loss, or those intended to protect specific species such as the Endangered species Act in the US or the Birds and Habitats Directives in the EU.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_Lobbying_and_advocacy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_EB_Lobbying_and_Advocacy_Assessment_Framework+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113604,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A04.EC Lobbying and Advocacy Framework Application",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_EC_Lobbying_and_Advocacy_Framework_Application.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A04.EC Lobbying and Advocacy Framework Application",
      "question": "Does the company provide evidence of annually applying the framework across all trade associations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company advocates nature-positive policies and regulations and discloses any misalignment with its lobbying activities as well as the measures it takes to address misalignment.</p><p>Rationale: Both individually and through trade associations, companies should advocate nature-positive policies and regulations. Companies should not finance trade associations that undermine nature-positive policies, including regarding the climate. Companies should conduct regular due diligence on the trade associations they support, and fully disclose the names of the associations, the alignment of their lobbying activities with policies and regulations that support nature-positive outcomes and their action plans to correct any misalignment.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company explains how the assessment has been applied to each industry association it is a member of.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_Lobbying_and_advocacy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_EC_Lobbying_and_Advocacy_Framework_Application+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113616,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A04.ED Lobbying and Advocacy Misalignment Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_ED_Lobbying_and_Advocacy_Misalignment_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A04.ED Lobbying and Advocacy Misalignment Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report any misalignment between the lobbying activities of its trade associations and its sustainability targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company advocates nature-positive policies and regulations and discloses any misalignment with its lobbying activities as well as the measures it takes to address misalignment.</p><p>Rationale: Both individually and through trade associations, companies should advocate nature-positive policies and regulations. Companies should not finance trade associations that undermine nature-positive policies, including regarding the climate. Companies should conduct regular due diligence on the trade associations they support, and fully disclose the names of the associations, the alignment of their lobbying activities with policies and regulations that support nature-positive outcomes and their action plans to correct any misalignment.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must provide details on the misalignment it has identified. General remarks about misalignment without explaining what it is and why it exists are not sufficient.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_Lobbying_and_advocacy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_ED_Lobbying_and_Advocacy_Misalignment_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113628,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A04.EE Lobbying and Advocacy Misalignment Escalation Action Plan",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_EE_Lobbying_and_Advocacy_Misalignment_Escalation_Action_Plan.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A04.EE Lobbying and Advocacy Misalignment Escalation Action Plan",
      "question": "Does the company disclose an action plan to address misalignment which includes clear escalation steps?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company advocates nature-positive policies and regulations and discloses any misalignment with its lobbying activities as well as the measures it takes to address misalignment.</p><p>Rationale: Both individually and through trade associations, companies should advocate nature-positive policies and regulations. Companies should not finance trade associations that undermine nature-positive policies, including regarding the climate. Companies should conduct regular due diligence on the trade associations they support, and fully disclose the names of the associations, the alignment of their lobbying activities with policies and regulations that support nature-positive outcomes and their action plans to correct any misalignment.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric \"We may\" is not accepted.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_Lobbying_and_advocacy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_EE_Lobbying_and_Advocacy_Misalignment_Escalation_Action_Plan+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113640,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A04.EF Lobbying and Advocacy Misalignment Escalation Action Plan Deadlines",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_EF_Lobbying_and_Advocacy_Misalignment_Escalation_Action_Plan_Deadlines.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A04.EF Lobbying and Advocacy Misalignment Escalation Action Plan Deadlines",
      "question": "Does the company disclose clear deadlines for each of its escalation steps and consistently report on their application?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company advocates nature-positive policies and regulations and discloses any misalignment with its lobbying activities as well as the measures it takes to address misalignment.</p><p>Rationale: Both individually and through trade associations, companies should advocate nature-positive policies and regulations. Companies should not finance trade associations that undermine nature-positive policies, including regarding the climate. Companies should conduct regular due diligence on the trade associations they support, and fully disclose the names of the associations, the alignment of their lobbying activities with policies and regulations that support nature-positive outcomes and their action plans to correct any misalignment.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric The action plan should include escalation steps and clear deadlines. the company should disclose examples of action to address misalignment.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_Lobbying_and_advocacy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_EF_Lobbying_and_Advocacy_Misalignment_Escalation_Action_Plan_Deadlines+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113652,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A04.EG Lobbying and Advocacy Annual Review Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_EG_Lobbying_and_Advocacy_Annual_Review_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A04.EG Lobbying and Advocacy Annual Review Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose an annual review of all the advocacy activities it has undertaken?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company advocates nature-positive policies and regulations and discloses any misalignment with its lobbying activities as well as the measures it takes to address misalignment.</p><p>Rationale: Both individually and through trade associations, companies should advocate nature-positive policies and regulations. Companies should not finance trade associations that undermine nature-positive policies, including regarding the climate. Companies should conduct regular due diligence on the trade associations they support, and fully disclose the names of the associations, the alignment of their lobbying activities with policies and regulations that support nature-positive outcomes and their action plans to correct any misalignment.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company should disclose all advocacy activities on specific items of regulation and legislation which are material to the company's operations, business sector, and/or the region(s) in which it operates.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_Lobbying_and_advocacy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_EG_Lobbying_and_Advocacy_Annual_Review_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113664,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A05.EA Circular and Nature-Positive Transition Assessment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A05_EA_Circular_and_Nature_Positive_Transition_Assessment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A05.EA Circular and Nature-Positive Transition Assessment",
      "question": "Does the company assess the risks and opportunities related to the transition to a circular economy and determine the impacts of staying in a linear economy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company's business model embeds circularity and follows a pathway that aligns with nature's full recovery by 2050.</p><p>Rationale: Biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse is one of the top five threats to humanity (WEF, 2020). Over half of the world's GDP is dependent on ecosystem services, and it has been estimated</p><p>that nature-positive actions could generate up to USD 10 trillion. There is an urgent need to act by adopting circular and nature-positive business models with a mitigation hierarchy approach at their core. This profound change in the way business interacts with nature is required in order to stabilize biodiversity in the decade to 2030, allow for the recovery of natural ecosystems in the next 20 years and achieve net improvements by 2050 (CBD, 2021).</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company needs to show that it looks at both the risks and opportunities of transitioning to a circular economy. A strong emphasis is given to how the company analyses its dependence on the linear economy as well as on it reflects on the impact that staying in a linear economy would have on the business model. </p><p>Keywords: Linear, linear risk, Circular risk assessment, circular scenario analysis.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A05_EA_Circular_and_Nature_Positive_Transition_Assessment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113676,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A05.EB Circular and Nature-Positive Transition Group-Level Evidence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A05_EB_Circular_and_Nature_Positive_Transition_Group_Level_Evidence.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A05.EB Circular and Nature-Positive Transition Group-Level Evidence",
      "question": "Does the company provide evidence of integrating circularity in its strategy at the group level?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company's business model embeds circularity and follows a pathway that aligns with nature's full recovery by 2050.</p><p>Rationale: Biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse is one of the top five threats to humanity (WEF, 2020). Over half of the world's GDP is dependent on ecosystem services, and it has been estimated</p><p>that nature-positive actions could generate up to USD 10 trillion. There is an urgent need to act by adopting circular and nature-positive business models with a mitigation hierarchy approach at their core. This profound change in the way business interacts with nature is required in order to stabilize biodiversity in the decade to 2030, allow for the recovery of natural ecosystems in the next 20 years and achieve net improvements by 2050 (CBD, 2021).</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric Evidence that a company is integrating circularity in its strategy includes a description of circular targets or commitments or mentions in policy documents or CEO messages about “circularity” or “resource-recycling/recycling-oriented society” (more often used by Japanese companies). There must be evidence of C-suite level responsibility for the circularity strategy, and thus isolated mentions on the company website, for example, are not sufficient. A mention in the sustainability report is typically enough. </p><p>Keywords: Circular, Circularity</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A05_EB_Circular_and_Nature_Positive_Transition_Group_Level_Evidence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113688,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A05.EC Circular and Nature-Positive Transition Strategy Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A05_EC_Circular_and_Nature_Positive_Transition_Strategy_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A05.EC Circular and Nature-Positive Transition Strategy Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a strategy that would lead its business model to become nature-positive, which includes a timeframe in line with milestones for halting biodiversity loss (no net loss) and reversing the trend (biodiversity net gain)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company's business model embeds circularity and follows a pathway that aligns with nature's full recovery by 2050.</p><p>Rationale: Biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse is one of the top five threats to humanity (WEF, 2020). Over half of the world's GDP is dependent on ecosystem services, and it has been estimated</p><p>that nature-positive actions could generate up to USD 10 trillion. There is an urgent need to act by adopting circular and nature-positive business models with a mitigation hierarchy approach at their core. This profound change in the way business interacts with nature is required in order to stabilize biodiversity in the decade to 2030, allow for the recovery of natural ecosystems in the next 20 years and achieve net improvements by 2050 (CBD, 2021).</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must disclose a specific timeline and action plan to become nature positive. Simply stating a long-term goal without interim milestones or KPIs is not sufficient. </p><p>Keywords: ‘No Net Loss' (NNL), ‘Net gain' (NG), “Net Positive Impact” (NPI), net positive, mitigation, mitigation hierarchy, AR3T, mitigate, avoid, reduce, conservation hierarchy</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A05_EC_Circular_and_Nature_Positive_Transition_Strategy_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113700,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A05.ED Circular and Nature-Positive Transition Mitigation Hierarchy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A05_ED_Circular_and_Nature_Positive_Transition_Mitigation_Hierarchy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A05.ED Circular and Nature-Positive Transition Mitigation Hierarchy",
      "question": "Does the company apply a mitigation hierarchy approach to its biodiversity targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company's business model embeds circularity and follows a pathway that aligns with nature's full recovery by 2050.</p><p>Rationale: Biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse is one of the top five threats to humanity (WEF, 2020). Over half of the world's GDP is dependent on ecosystem services, and it has been estimated</p><p>that nature-positive actions could generate up to USD 10 trillion. There is an urgent need to act by adopting circular and nature-positive business models with a mitigation hierarchy approach at their core. This profound change in the way business interacts with nature is required in order to stabilize biodiversity in the decade to 2030, allow for the recovery of natural ecosystems in the next 20 years and achieve net improvements by 2050 (CBD, 2021).</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must show a decision-making framework involving a sequence of steps starting with the avoidance of impacts, followed by the minimization of inevitable impacts, on-site restoration and finally, where feasible and necessary, biodiversity offsets. Evidence must be provided of both clear targets and that the mitigation hierarchy is applied systematically. </p><p>Keywords: ‘No Net Loss' (NNL), ‘Net gain' (NG), “Net Positive Impact” (NPI), biodiversity strategy, biodiversity plan, SBTN, CBD, Aichi Targets, science-based, net positive, nature positive, Global Biodiversity Framework.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A05_ED_Circular_and_Nature_Positive_Transition_Mitigation_Hierarchy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113712,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B01.EA Assessment of Impacts on Nature",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_EA_Assessment_of_Impacts_on_Nature.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B01.EA Assessment of Impacts on Nature",
      "question": "Does the company assess its impacts on nature, including biodiversity, within its own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company assesses its impacts on nature, including biodiversity and nature's contributions to people, both within its own operations and the upstream and downstream parts of its value chain.</p><p>Rationale: Impacts on nature can be broadly described as changes in the state of ecosystems and species, resulting from human activity, occurring because of both direct and indirect drivers of biodiversity loss (IPBES, 2019). The benefits provided by biodiversity are essential to human wellbeing. Yet despite past and current efforts, biodiversity continues to deteriorate and could reach a disastrous tipping point under business-as-usual conditions. This is becoming a major concern for corporate activity, and there is growing demand for companies to disclose reliable data on this topic. However, according to the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB, 2021), this is currently no common practice and only around 10% of companies (CDSB, 2020) report high-level commitments and some relevant metrics. Disclosure will play a key role in achieving global biodiversity targets and in triggering the systemic changes required to do so.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company discloses an identification process to determine the impacts its own operations have on nature. This includes disclosing the results of the process, along with the methodology used. The element focuses on all types of impact (actual, potential, direct, indirect). The assessment should cover all the company's (own) operations. In the case that it does not cover all operations, this can be met if it covers roughly a third of operations and the company discloses have a timebound commitment to cover all operations. Element can be partially met.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable",
        "Partially"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_Assessments_of_impacts_on_nature.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_EA_Assessment_of_Impacts_on_Nature+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113724,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B01.EB Assessment of Impacts on Nature Upstream Value Chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_EB_Assessment_of_Impacts_on_Nature_Upstream_Value_Chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B01.EB Assessment of Impacts on Nature Upstream Value Chain",
      "question": "Does the company assess its impacts on nature, including biodiversity, in the upstream activities of its value chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company assesses its impacts on nature, including biodiversity and nature's contributions to people, both within its own operations and the upstream and downstream parts of its value chain.</p><p>Rationale: Impacts on nature can be broadly described as changes in the state of ecosystems and species, resulting from human activity, occurring because of both direct and indirect drivers of biodiversity loss (IPBES, 2019). The benefits provided by biodiversity are essential to human wellbeing. Yet despite past and current efforts, biodiversity continues to deteriorate and could reach a disastrous tipping point under business-as-usual conditions. This is becoming a major concern for corporate activity, and there is growing demand for companies to disclose reliable data on this topic. However, according to the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB, 2021), this is currently no common practice and only around 10% of companies (CDSB, 2020) report high-level commitments and some relevant metrics. Disclosure will play a key role in achieving global biodiversity targets and in triggering the systemic changes required to do so.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company needs to disclose the same process as above, but for its upstream operations. This includes disclosing the results of the process, along with the methodology used. The assessment needs to cover all of its upstream operations. In the case it doesn't cover all upstream value chain, this can be met if it covers roughly a third of upstream value chain and the company discloses have a timebound commitment to cover all operations.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable",
        "Partially"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_Assessments_of_impacts_on_nature.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_EB_Assessment_of_Impacts_on_Nature_Upstream_Value_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113736,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B01.EC Assessment of Impacts on Nature Downstream Value Chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_EC_Assessment_of_Impacts_on_Nature_Downstream_Value_Chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B01.EC Assessment of Impacts on Nature Downstream Value Chain",
      "question": "Does the company assess its impacts on nature, including biodiversity, in the downstream activities of its value chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company assesses its impacts on nature, including biodiversity and nature's contributions to people, both within its own operations and the upstream and downstream parts of its value chain.</p><p>Rationale: Impacts on nature can be broadly described as changes in the state of ecosystems and species, resulting from human activity, occurring because of both direct and indirect drivers of biodiversity loss (IPBES, 2019). The benefits provided by biodiversity are essential to human wellbeing. Yet despite past and current efforts, biodiversity continues to deteriorate and could reach a disastrous tipping point under business-as-usual conditions. This is becoming a major concern for corporate activity, and there is growing demand for companies to disclose reliable data on this topic. However, according to the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB, 2021), this is currently no common practice and only around 10% of companies (CDSB, 2020) report high-level commitments and some relevant metrics. Disclosure will play a key role in achieving global biodiversity targets and in triggering the systemic changes required to do so.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company needs to disclose the same process as above, but to its downstream activities. This includes disclosing the results of such process, along with the methodology followed. The assessment needs to cover all of its downstream operations. In the case it doesn't cover all, this can be met if it covers roughly a third of downstream value chain and the company discloses have a timebound commitment to cover all operations.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable",
        "Partially"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_Assessments_of_impacts_on_nature.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_EC_Assessment_of_Impacts_on_Nature_Downstream_Value_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113748,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B01.ED Assessment of Impacts on Nature Stakeholder Assessment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_ED_Assessment_of_Impacts_on_Nature_Stakeholder_Assessment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B01.ED Assessment of Impacts on Nature Stakeholder Assessment",
      "question": "Does the company assess whether its impacts on nature, including biodiversity, contribute to a cumulative effect, with other stakeholders, on the locations within its own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company assesses its impacts on nature, including biodiversity and nature's contributions to people, both within its own operations and the upstream and downstream parts of its value chain.</p><p>Rationale: Impacts on nature can be broadly described as changes in the state of ecosystems and species, resulting from human activity, occurring because of both direct and indirect drivers of biodiversity loss (IPBES, 2019). The benefits provided by biodiversity are essential to human wellbeing. Yet despite past and current efforts, biodiversity continues to deteriorate and could reach a disastrous tipping point under business-as-usual conditions. This is becoming a major concern for corporate activity, and there is growing demand for companies to disclose reliable data on this topic. However, according to the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB, 2021), this is currently no common practice and only around 10% of companies (CDSB, 2020) report high-level commitments and some relevant metrics. Disclosure will play a key role in achieving global biodiversity targets and in triggering the systemic changes required to do so.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company identifies whether it contributes to cumulative impacts in its own operations. Results and methodology should be included in the disclosure.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable",
        "Partially"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_Assessments_of_impacts_on_nature.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_ED_Assessment_of_Impacts_on_Nature_Stakeholder_Assessment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113760,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B01.EE Assessment of Impacts on Nature Including Biodiversity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_EE_Assessment_of_Impacts_on_Nature_Including_Biodiversity.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B01.EE Assessment of Impacts on Nature Including Biodiversity",
      "question": "Does the company quantify its impacts on nature, including biodiversity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company assesses its impacts on nature, including biodiversity and nature's contributions to people, both within its own operations and the upstream and downstream parts of its value chain.</p><p>Rationale: Impacts on nature can be broadly described as changes in the state of ecosystems and species, resulting from human activity, occurring because of both direct and indirect drivers of biodiversity loss (IPBES, 2019). The benefits provided by biodiversity are essential to human wellbeing. Yet despite past and current efforts, biodiversity continues to deteriorate and could reach a disastrous tipping point under business-as-usual conditions. This is becoming a major concern for corporate activity, and there is growing demand for companies to disclose reliable data on this topic. However, according to the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB, 2021), this is currently no common practice and only around 10% of companies (CDSB, 2020) report high-level commitments and some relevant metrics. Disclosure will play a key role in achieving global biodiversity targets and in triggering the systemic changes required to do so.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company discloses methods and tools used to quantify its impacts, along with the results. Only own operations are required for this element.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable",
        "Partially"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_Assessments_of_impacts_on_nature.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_EE_Assessment_of_Impacts_on_Nature_Including_Biodiversity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113772,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B02.EA Assessment of Dependencies on Nature",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B02_EA_Assessment_of_Dependencies_on_Nature.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B02.EA Assessment of Dependencies on Nature",
      "question": "Does the company assess its dependencies on nature within its own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company assesses its dependencies on nature, including biodiversity and nature's contributions to people (NCP), both within its own operations and the upstream and downstream elements of its value chain.</p><p>Rationale: Nature's contributions to people (NCP), or ecosystem services, are the benefits that humans derive from ecosystems and on which human life and activities, including corporate activities, rely. Research shows that more than 50% of global gross domestic product is directly linked to these ecosystem services (WEF and PwC, 2020), with most companies depending on nature, including biodiversity and NCP, as part of their business model. Thus, for companies to understand their relation to biodiversity, it is necessary that they assess not only their impacts but also their dependencies.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company discloses an identification process to determine its dependencies on nature. This includes disclosing the results of such process, along with the methodology followed. The assessment should cover all (own) operations. In the case it doesn't cover all operations, this can be met if it covers roughly a third of operations and the company discloses have a timebound commitment to cover all operations.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B02_Assessment_of_dependencies_on_nature.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B02_EA_Assessment_of_Dependencies_on_Nature+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113784,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B02.EB Assessment of Dependencies on Nature Upstream Value Chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B02_EB_Assessment_of_Dependencies_on_Nature_Upstream_Value_Chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B02.EB Assessment of Dependencies on Nature Upstream Value Chain",
      "question": "Does the company assess dependencies on nature of its upstream business relationships?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company assesses its dependencies on nature, including biodiversity and nature's contributions to people (NCP), both within its own operations and the upstream and downstream elements of its value chain.</p><p>Rationale: Nature's contributions to people (NCP), or ecosystem services, are the benefits that humans derive from ecosystems and on which human life and activities, including corporate activities, rely. Research shows that more than 50% of global gross domestic product is directly linked to these ecosystem services (WEF and PwC, 2020), with most companies depending on nature, including biodiversity and NCP, as part of their business model. Thus, for companies to understand their relation to biodiversity, it is necessary that they assess not only their impacts but also their dependencies.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company needs to disclose the same process as above, but to its upstream operations. This includes disclosing the results of such process, along with the methodology followed. The assessment needs to cover all of its upstream operations. In the case it doesn't cover all upstream value chain, this can be met if it covers roughly a third of upstream value chain and the company discloses have a timebound commitment to cover all operations.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B02_Assessment_of_dependencies_on_nature.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B02_EB_Assessment_of_Dependencies_on_Nature_Upstream_Value_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113796,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B02.EC Assessment of Dependencies on Nature Downstream Value Chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B02_EC_Assessment_of_Dependencies_on_Nature_Downstream_Value_Chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B02.EC Assessment of Dependencies on Nature Downstream Value Chain",
      "question": "Does the company assess dependencies on nature of its downstream business relationships?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company assesses its dependencies on nature, including biodiversity and nature's contributions to people (NCP), both within its own operations and the upstream and downstream elements of its value chain.</p><p>Rationale: Nature's contributions to people (NCP), or ecosystem services, are the benefits that humans derive from ecosystems and on which human life and activities, including corporate activities, rely. Research shows that more than 50% of global gross domestic product is directly linked to these ecosystem services (WEF and PwC, 2020), with most companies depending on nature, including biodiversity and NCP, as part of their business model. Thus, for companies to understand their relation to biodiversity, it is necessary that they assess not only their impacts but also their dependencies.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company needs to disclose the same process as above, but to its downstream activities. This includes disclosing the results of such process, along with the methodology followed. The assessment needs to cover all of its downstream operations. In the case it doesn't cover all, this can be met if it covers roughly a third of downstream value chain and the company discloses have a timebound commitment to cover all operations.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B02_Assessment_of_dependencies_on_nature.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B02_EC_Assessment_of_Dependencies_on_Nature_Downstream_Value_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113808,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B02.ED Assessment of Dependencies on Nature Quantification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B02_ED_Assessment_of_Dependencies_on_Nature_Quantification.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B02.ED Assessment of Dependencies on Nature Quantification",
      "question": "Does the company quantify its dependencies on nature in its own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company assesses its dependencies on nature, including biodiversity and nature's contributions to people (NCP), both within its own operations and the upstream and downstream elements of its value chain.</p><p>Rationale: Nature's contributions to people (NCP), or ecosystem services, are the benefits that humans derive from ecosystems and on which human life and activities, including corporate activities, rely. Research shows that more than 50% of global gross domestic product is directly linked to these ecosystem services (WEF and PwC, 2020), with most companies depending on nature, including biodiversity and NCP, as part of their business model. Thus, for companies to understand their relation to biodiversity, it is necessary that they assess not only their impacts but also their dependencies.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company discloses methods and tools used to quantify its dependencies, along with the results. Only own operations required for this element.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B02_Assessment_of_dependencies_on_nature.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B02_ED_Assessment_of_Dependencies_on_Nature_Quantification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113820,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B03.EA Location Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B03_EA_Location_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B03.EA Location Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose all the locations (owned and controlled) where it conducts activities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses the locations where it operates as well as those locations' position and impact on areas important for biodiversity. </p><p>Rationale: According to the Key Biodiversity Areas Partnership (KBA Partnership, 2018), one of the main issues driving biodiversity loss is the destruction, degradation and overexploitation of nature. It is therefore a priority for companies to identify which areas of our planet where they operate – including their value chain – are critical to protect. Global goals and targets on biodiversity are currently under negotiation and should be adopted in 2022 as the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). The current negotiating draft of the GBF includes a goal of ‘an increase of at least 15% in the area, connectivity and integrity of natural ecosystems', and a target to conserve ‘at least 30% globally of land areas and of sea areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and its contributions to people' (CBD, 2021).</p><p> </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric companies should disclose the country and region for this to be met. A map without sufficient detail is not enough. All types of locations are to be included, such as offices and production sites.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B03_Key_areas_important_for_biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B03_EA_Location_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113832,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B03.EB Key Areas Important for Biodiversity Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B03_EB_Key_Areas_Important_for_Biodiversity_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B03.EB Key Areas Important for Biodiversity Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the locations that are in or adjacent to areas important for biodiversity within its own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses the locations where it operates as well as those locations' position and impact on areas important for biodiversity. </p><p>Rationale: According to the Key Biodiversity Areas Partnership (KBA Partnership, 2018), one of the main issues driving biodiversity loss is the destruction, degradation and overexploitation of nature. It is therefore a priority for companies to identify which areas of our planet where they operate – including their value chain – are critical to protect. Global goals and targets on biodiversity are currently under negotiation and should be adopted in 2022 as the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). The current negotiating draft of the GBF includes a goal of ‘an increase of at least 15% in the area, connectivity and integrity of natural ecosystems', and a target to conserve ‘at least 30% globally of land areas and of sea areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and its contributions to people' (CBD, 2021).</p><p> </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company should disclose the name of the location and the name of the area important to biodiversity. Areas important for biodiversity refers to areas of land, sea or fresh water which have been identified as important for biodiversity, such as: </p><p>• protected areas on national, regional and international lists </p><p>• areas of high biodiversity value and High Conservation Value Areas </p><p>• Key Biodiversity Areas </p><p>• biodiversity hotspots </p><p>• IUCN Protected Area Management Categories </p><p>• IUCN Green List </p><p>• UNESCO Heritage (natural criteria) </p><p>• Ramsar Convention</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B03_Key_areas_important_for_biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B03_EB_Key_Areas_Important_for_Biodiversity_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113844,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B03.EC Key Areas Important for Biodiversity Upstream Relationships",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B03_EC_Key_Areas_Important_for_Biodiversity_Upstream_Relationships.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B03.EC Key Areas Important for Biodiversity Upstream Relationships",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the locations of its upstream business relationships, including suppliers, that are in or adjacent to areas important for biodiversity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses the locations where it operates as well as those locations' position and impact on areas important for biodiversity. </p><p>Rationale: According to the Key Biodiversity Areas Partnership (KBA Partnership, 2018), one of the main issues driving biodiversity loss is the destruction, degradation and overexploitation of nature. It is therefore a priority for companies to identify which areas of our planet where they operate – including their value chain – are critical to protect. Global goals and targets on biodiversity are currently under negotiation and should be adopted in 2022 as the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). The current negotiating draft of the GBF includes a goal of ‘an increase of at least 15% in the area, connectivity and integrity of natural ecosystems', and a target to conserve ‘at least 30% globally of land areas and of sea areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and its contributions to people' (CBD, 2021).</p><p> </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company should disclose the name of the location and the name of the area important to biodiversity. Areas important for biodiversity refers to areas of land, sea or fresh water which have been identified as important for biodiversity, such as: </p><p>• protected areas on national, regional and international lists </p><p>• areas of high biodiversity value and High Conservation Value Areas </p><p>• Key Biodiversity Areas </p><p>• biodiversity hotspots </p><p>• IUCN Protected Area Management Categories </p><p>• IUCN Green List </p><p>• UNESCO Heritage (natural criteria) </p><p>• Ramsar Convention</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B03_Key_areas_important_for_biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B03_EC_Key_Areas_Important_for_Biodiversity_Upstream_Relationships+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113856,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B03.ED Key Areas Important for Biodiversity Management Plan",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B03_ED_Key_Areas_Important_for_Biodiversity_Management_Plan.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B03.ED Key Areas Important for Biodiversity Management Plan",
      "question": "Does the company have a management plan for locations within its own operations adjacent to areas important for biodiversity, and discloses the percentage of land, fresh water, and sea use in such locations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses the locations where it operates as well as those locations' position and impact on areas important for biodiversity. </p><p>Rationale: According to the Key Biodiversity Areas Partnership (KBA Partnership, 2018), one of the main issues driving biodiversity loss is the destruction, degradation and overexploitation of nature. It is therefore a priority for companies to identify which areas of our planet where they operate – including their value chain – are critical to protect. Global goals and targets on biodiversity are currently under negotiation and should be adopted in 2022 as the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). The current negotiating draft of the GBF includes a goal of ‘an increase of at least 15% in the area, connectivity and integrity of natural ecosystems', and a target to conserve ‘at least 30% globally of land areas and of sea areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and its contributions to people' (CBD, 2021).</p><p> </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company's management plan must rely on science-based metrics that integrate biodiversity. Management plans can be included in documents such as Environmental Policy, Sustainable Development Policy, or location-related documents. The management plan should specify the percentage of land or sea/freshwater covered by the management plan (or specify if other metric is used, for example, the percentage of operations), which metrics are used to track progress or application of management plan and whether timebound targets are established.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B03_Key_areas_important_for_biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B03_ED_Key_Areas_Important_for_Biodiversity_Management_Plan+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113868,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B04.EA Key Species Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_EA_Key_Species_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B04.EA Key Species Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose species populations existing in or adjacent to its own locations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses the species found within its own operations' locations as well as those within its business relationships' locations. The company also discloses the status of these species, in accordance with national and international conservation lists. </p><p>Rationale: Despite past multilateral policy efforts, like the Aichi Targets that expired in 2020, the rate of species extinction is approximately 1,000 times higher than ever before, and the total number of wild mammals is declining by 82% compared to historical records (WEF and PwC, 2020). As scientists have put bluntly, we are witnessing a ‘biological annihilation' amounting to the sixth mass extinction. In the past, the major threats to species have been well documented. However, establishing specific targets for threat reduction is complex because there are large numbers of threatened species as well as rapid deterioration of habitats. Along with efforts to preserve key areas for biodiversity, companies can contribute to the process of halting species abundance and richness loss and extinction.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company discloses all species present in or adjacent (or in close proximity) to its own locations, regardless of whether these species are listed in any type of conservation list (national or international).</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_Key_species.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_EA_Key_Species_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113880,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B04.EB Key Species Upstream Relationship Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_EB_Key_Species_Upstream_Relationship_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B04.EB Key Species Upstream Relationship Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose species populations existing in or adjacent to the locations of its upstream business relationships, including suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses the species found within its own operations' locations as well as those within its business relationships' locations. The company also discloses the status of these species, in accordance with national and international conservation lists. </p><p>Rationale: Despite past multilateral policy efforts, like the Aichi Targets that expired in 2020, the rate of species extinction is approximately 1,000 times higher than ever before, and the total number of wild mammals is declining by 82% compared to historical records (WEF and PwC, 2020). As scientists have put bluntly, we are witnessing a ‘biological annihilation' amounting to the sixth mass extinction. In the past, the major threats to species have been well documented. However, establishing specific targets for threat reduction is complex because there are large numbers of threatened species as well as rapid deterioration of habitats. Along with efforts to preserve key areas for biodiversity, companies can contribute to the process of halting species abundance and richness loss and extinction.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company discloses all species present in or adjacent (or in close proximity) to its business relationships locations, regardless of whether these species are listed in any type of conservation list (national or international).</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_Key_species.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_EB_Key_Species_Upstream_Relationship_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113892,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B04.EC Key Species Status Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_EC_Key_Species_Status_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B04.EC Key Species Status Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose status according to national and international conservation lists for species found both in its own locations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses the species found within its own operations' locations as well as those within its business relationships' locations. The company also discloses the status of these species, in accordance with national and international conservation lists. </p><p>Rationale: Despite past multilateral policy efforts, like the Aichi Targets that expired in 2020, the rate of species extinction is approximately 1,000 times higher than ever before, and the total number of wild mammals is declining by 82% compared to historical records (WEF and PwC, 2020). As scientists have put bluntly, we are witnessing a ‘biological annihilation' amounting to the sixth mass extinction. In the past, the major threats to species have been well documented. However, establishing specific targets for threat reduction is complex because there are large numbers of threatened species as well as rapid deterioration of habitats. Along with efforts to preserve key areas for biodiversity, companies can contribute to the process of halting species abundance and richness loss and extinction.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company discloses the status of all species, regardless of status (for example, disclosing species of Low Concern status).</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_Key_species.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_EC_Key_Species_Status_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113904,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B04.ED Key Species Status Upstream Relationship Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_ED_Key_Species_Status_Upstream_Relationship_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B04.ED Key Species Status Upstream Relationship Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose status according to national and international conservation lists for species found in its upstream business relationships locations, including suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses the species found within its own operations' locations as well as those within its business relationships' locations. The company also discloses the status of these species, in accordance with national and international conservation lists. </p><p>Rationale: Despite past multilateral policy efforts, like the Aichi Targets that expired in 2020, the rate of species extinction is approximately 1,000 times higher than ever before, and the total number of wild mammals is declining by 82% compared to historical records (WEF and PwC, 2020). As scientists have put bluntly, we are witnessing a ‘biological annihilation' amounting to the sixth mass extinction. In the past, the major threats to species have been well documented. However, establishing specific targets for threat reduction is complex because there are large numbers of threatened species as well as rapid deterioration of habitats. Along with efforts to preserve key areas for biodiversity, companies can contribute to the process of halting species abundance and richness loss and extinction.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company discloses the status of all species, regardless of status (for example, disclosing species of Low Concern status).</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_Key_species.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_ED_Key_Species_Status_Upstream_Relationship_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113916,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B04.EE Key Species Conservation Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_EE_Key_Species_Conservation_Strategy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B04.EE Key Species Conservation Strategy",
      "question": "Does the company have a strategy regarding the conservation of species impacted by its own operations and value chain, aiming for a net-positive impact on threatened species?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses the species found within its own operations' locations as well as those within its business relationships' locations. The company also discloses the status of these species, in accordance with national and international conservation lists. </p><p>Rationale: Despite past multilateral policy efforts, like the Aichi Targets that expired in 2020, the rate of species extinction is approximately 1,000 times higher than ever before, and the total number of wild mammals is declining by 82% compared to historical records (WEF and PwC, 2020). As scientists have put bluntly, we are witnessing a ‘biological annihilation' amounting to the sixth mass extinction. In the past, the major threats to species have been well documented. However, establishing specific targets for threat reduction is complex because there are large numbers of threatened species as well as rapid deterioration of habitats. Along with efforts to preserve key areas for biodiversity, companies can contribute to the process of halting species abundance and richness loss and extinction.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company has a strategy, policy document, or operations document regarding the conservation of species impacted by its activities (both own operations and value chain). At this stage, companies can meet this element with only own operations, or only value chain.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_Key_species.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_EE_Key_Species_Conservation_Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113928,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B05.EA Zero Ecosystem Conversion Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_EA_Zero_Ecosystem_Conversion_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B05.EA Zero Ecosystem Conversion Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company commit to ensuring zero conversion across its relevant high-risk commodities or across all material realms (land, fresh water and marine)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company demonstrates that it is minimizing its footprint from its business activities across all relevant ecosystems and/or looking to achieve conversion-free supply chains across relevant high-risk commodities.</p><p>Rationale: Land use change through the conversion of natural habitats is among the most significant drivers of biodiversity loss in terrestrial ecosystems. Agricultural production alone is responsible for 80% (WWF, 2020) of global deforestation. Moreover, extractive sectors including the metals and mining and oil and gas sectors have significant impact on converting ecosystems through their business activities, including land degradation or conversion of wetlands. Aligning with the SBTN interim targets to ensure zero deforestation and conversion from 2020 in all corporate supply chains, this indicator focuses on ensuring companies set targets to minimize their footprint across all relevant ecosystem realms. </p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the commitment must apply to all the company's high-risk commodities or material realms. When the company does not list all of its relevant high-risk commodities and/or material realms, a commitment is accepted if it applies to all company activities or to the company in the broader sense. Commitments are accepted even if the company does not specify if it applies to all its supply chains.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_Ecosystem_Conversion.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_EA_Zero_Ecosystem_Conversion_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113940,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B05.EB Zero Ecosystem Conversion Evidence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_EB_Zero_Ecosystem_Conversion_Evidence.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B05.EB Zero Ecosystem Conversion Evidence",
      "question": "Does the company provide qualitative evidence towards achieving conversion-free supply chains?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric demonstrating actual actions for at least one high-risk commodity, material realm, or supply chain is enough to score. Demonstrations of actual actions can be mentioning and/or describing initiatives or programs, engaging and collaborating with suppliers (in the context of ecosystem conversion issues), or disclosing commodities sourced according to certification programs and standards.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_Ecosystem_Conversion.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_EB_Zero_Ecosystem_Conversion_Evidence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113952,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B05.EC Zero Ecosystem Conversion Time-Bound Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_EC_Zero_Ecosystem_Conversion_Time_Bound_Targets.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B05.EC Zero Ecosystem Conversion Time-Bound Targets",
      "question": "Does the company have time-bound conversion-free targets for all of its relevant high-risk commodities or across all material realms (land, fresh water and marine)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company demonstrates that it is minimizing its footprint from its business activities across all relevant ecosystems and/or looking to achieve conversion-free supply chains across relevant high-risk commodities.</p><p>Rationale: Land use change through the conversion of natural habitats is among the most significant drivers of biodiversity loss in terrestrial ecosystems. Agricultural production alone is responsible for 80% (WWF, 2020) of global deforestation. Moreover, extractive sectors including the metals and mining and oil and gas sectors have significant impact on converting ecosystems through their business activities, including land degradation or conversion of wetlands. Aligning with the SBTN interim targets to ensure zero deforestation and conversion from 2020 in all corporate supply chains, this indicator focuses on ensuring companies set targets to minimize their footprint across all relevant ecosystem realms. </p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must have targets for each high-risk commodity and/or material realms.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Conversion for Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_Ecosystem_Conversion.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_EC_Zero_Ecosystem_Conversion_Time_Bound_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113964,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B05.ED Ecosystem Conversion High-Risk Commodities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_ED_Ecosystem_Conversion_High_Risk_Commodities.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B05.ED Ecosystem Conversion High-Risk Commodities",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the proportion of high-risk commodities which are conversion-free, if applicable?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must disclose progress for all its relevant high-risk commodities.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_Ecosystem_Conversion.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_ED_Ecosystem_Conversion_High_Risk_Commodities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113976,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B05.EE Ecosystem Conversion High-Risk Commodities Sourcing Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_EE_Ecosystem_Conversion_High_Risk_Commodities_Sourcing_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B05.EE Ecosystem Conversion High-Risk Commodities Sourcing Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the sourcing regions of its high-risk commodities and its traceability system, if applicable?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company demonstrates that it is minimizing its footprint from its business activities across all relevant ecosystems and/or looking to achieve conversion-free supply chains across relevant high-risk commodities.</p><p>Rationale: Land use change through the conversion of natural habitats is among the most significant drivers of biodiversity loss in terrestrial ecosystems. Agricultural production alone is responsible for 80% (WWF, 2020) of global deforestation. Moreover, extractive sectors including the metals and mining and oil and gas sectors have significant impact on converting ecosystems through their business activities, including land degradation or conversion of wetlands. Aligning with the SBTN interim targets to ensure zero deforestation and conversion from 2020 in all corporate supply chains, this indicator focuses on ensuring companies set targets to minimize their footprint across all relevant ecosystem realms. </p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must disclose the sourcing regions for all its high-risk commodities. Specific geographical boundaries are not required. If the company discloses this but not its traceability system, it will still score for this element.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_Ecosystem_Conversion.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_EE_Ecosystem_Conversion_High_Risk_Commodities_Sourcing_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18113988,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B05.EF Ecosystem Conversion-Free Supply Chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_EF_Ecosystem_Conversion_Free_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B05.EF Ecosystem Conversion-Free Supply Chain",
      "question": "Does the company provide evidence that it has achieved 100% conversion-free supply chains for all its relevant high-risk commodities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company demonstrates that it is minimizing its footprint from its business activities across all relevant ecosystems and/or looking to achieve conversion-free supply chains across relevant high-risk commodities.</p><p>Rationale: Land use change through the conversion of natural habitats is among the most significant drivers of biodiversity loss in terrestrial ecosystems. Agricultural production alone is responsible for 80% (WWF, 2020) of global deforestation. Moreover, extractive sectors including the metals and mining and oil and gas sectors have significant impact on converting ecosystems through their business activities, including land degradation or conversion of wetlands. Aligning with the SBTN interim targets to ensure zero deforestation and conversion from 2020 in all corporate supply chains, this indicator focuses on ensuring companies set targets to minimize their footprint across all relevant ecosystem realms. </p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must demonstrate that it sources all its high-risk commodities without any kind of conversion. Certification schemes will be assessed to verify they will achieve zero conversion.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_Ecosystem_Conversion.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_EF_Ecosystem_Conversion_Free_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114000,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B05.EG Ecosystem Conversion Minimization Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_EG_Ecosystem_Conversion_Minimization_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B05.EG Ecosystem Conversion Minimization Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company have a commitment to minimise ecosystem conversion in the most material parts of its value chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the commitment should specifically mention minimise/reduce-type terms and ecosystem conversion, land degradation, deforestation, and similar terms. Commitments do not have to specifically mention the whole supply chain. Broad terms such as “minimise environmental impact” are not accepted.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Materiality Assessment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_Ecosystem_Conversion.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_EG_Ecosystem_Conversion_Minimization_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114012,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B05.EH Ecosystem Conversion Minimization Evidence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_EH_Ecosystem_Conversion_Minimization_Evidence.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B05.EH Ecosystem Conversion Minimization Evidence",
      "question": "Does the company disclose qualitative evidence towards minimizing ecosystem conversion in areas important for biodiversity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company demonstrates that it is minimizing its footprint from its business activities across all relevant ecosystems and/or looking to achieve conversion-free supply chains across relevant high-risk commodities.</p><p>Rationale: Land use change through the conversion of natural habitats is among the most significant drivers of biodiversity loss in terrestrial ecosystems. Agricultural production alone is responsible for 80% (WWF, 2020) of global deforestation. Moreover, extractive sectors including the metals and mining and oil and gas sectors have significant impact on converting ecosystems through their business activities, including land degradation or conversion of wetlands. Aligning with the SBTN interim targets to ensure zero deforestation and conversion from 2020 in all corporate supply chains, this indicator focuses on ensuring companies set targets to minimize their footprint across all relevant ecosystem realms. </p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric examples of qualitative evidence could include a policy by the company, minimizing conversion-programs on sites, projects by the company in public disclosure on minimizing ecosystem conversion where it operates.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_Ecosystem_Conversion.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_EH_Ecosystem_Conversion_Minimization_Evidence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114024,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B05.EI Ecosystem Conversion Minimization System Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_EI_Ecosystem_Conversion_Minimization_System_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B05.EI Ecosystem Conversion Minimization System Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its system to monitor, review and improve its performance on minimizing its footprint across material realms (land, fresh water and marine) affected by its activities and upstream business relationships?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must provide details about the system. Including how it monitors, reviews, and improves its performance. Mentioning a system without detail is not enough to score.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_Ecosystem_Conversion.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_EI_Ecosystem_Conversion_Minimization_System_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114036,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B05.EJ Ecosystem Conversion Minimization Targets Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_EJ_Ecosystem_Conversion_Minimization_Targets_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B05.EJ Ecosystem Conversion Minimization Targets Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose quantitative targets to minimize conversion in all material realms (land, fresh water and marine)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company demonstrates that it is minimizing its footprint from its business activities across all relevant ecosystems and/or looking to achieve conversion-free supply chains across relevant high-risk commodities.</p><p>Rationale: Land use change through the conversion of natural habitats is among the most significant drivers of biodiversity loss in terrestrial ecosystems. Agricultural production alone is responsible for 80% (WWF, 2020) of global deforestation. Moreover, extractive sectors including the metals and mining and oil and gas sectors have significant impact on converting ecosystems through their business activities, including land degradation or conversion of wetlands. Aligning with the SBTN interim targets to ensure zero deforestation and conversion from 2020 in all corporate supply chains, this indicator focuses on ensuring companies set targets to minimize their footprint across all relevant ecosystem realms. </p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric targets related to offsetting are not valid. The target should be set per company's sites.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_Ecosystem_Conversion.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_EJ_Ecosystem_Conversion_Minimization_Targets_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114048,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B06.EA Ecosystem Restoration Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B06_EA_Ecosystem_Restoration_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B06.EA Ecosystem Restoration Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company have a commitment regarding the restoration of ecosystems?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company demonstrates restoration activities in its value chain across all relevant ecosystems. </p><p>Rationale: The UN has declared the ten years to 2030 the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration – a rallying call for the protection and restoration of ecosystems for the benefit of both people and nature. This indicator aligns with the SBTN interim targets on ensuring that a proportion of natural or semi-natural habitats are retained or regenerated in working lands from 2020, and areas under restoration in all ecosystems are increased.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company has a commitment to restore ecosystems across the most relevant parts of its value chain. The commitment can be in the form of a public policy or a statement by the company. Ideally, restoration and regeneration actions should align with existing commitments. For example, Bonn Challenge commitments exist in many countries and aim to have 350 million hectares of degraded land under restoration by 2030 (non-exhaustive, other challenges / commitments out there also).</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B06_Ecosystem_Restoration.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B06_EA_Ecosystem_Restoration_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114060,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B06.EB Ecosystem Restoration Project Outcomes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B06_EB_Ecosystem_Restoration_Project_Outcomes.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B06.EB Ecosystem Restoration Project Outcomes",
      "question": "Does the company disclose details and outcomes of ecosystem restoration projects in areas affected by its own operations or upstream business relationships?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company demonstrates restoration activities in its value chain across all relevant ecosystems. </p><p>Rationale: The UN has declared the ten years to 2030 the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration – a rallying call for the protection and restoration of ecosystems for the benefit of both people and nature. This indicator aligns with the SBTN interim targets on ensuring that a proportion of natural or semi-natural habitats are retained or regenerated in working lands from 2020, and areas under restoration in all ecosystems are increased.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric outcomes include measurable and quantifiable improvements of the restoration project directly related to the company's actions. Actions that a company might take to regenerate and restore might include the following, depending on whether they are looking at land, freshwater, oceans or biodiversity: </p><p>• Ecological restoration. </p><p>• Supporting individual species recovery and/or diversity. </p><p>• Rehabilitation of degraded lands. </p><p>• Replenishment of freshwater systems. </p><p>• Management of production areas. </p><p>• Allowance for ecological permeability. </p><p>• Compensatory conservation/target-based ecological compensation. </p><p>An example could be restoration of degraded land back to a productive state or even further back to its natural state, prehuman impact.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B06_Ecosystem_Restoration.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B06_EB_Ecosystem_Restoration_Project_Outcomes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114072,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B06.EC Ecosystem Restoration Time-Bound Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B06_EC_Ecosystem_Restoration_Time_Bound_Targets.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B06.EC Ecosystem Restoration Time-Bound Targets",
      "question": "Does the company have a time-bound target for its ecosystem restoration activities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company demonstrates restoration activities in its value chain across all relevant ecosystems. </p><p>Rationale: The UN has declared the ten years to 2030 the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration – a rallying call for the protection and restoration of ecosystems for the benefit of both people and nature. This indicator aligns with the SBTN interim targets on ensuring that a proportion of natural or semi-natural habitats are retained or regenerated in working lands from 2020, and areas under restoration in all ecosystems are increased.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric not differentiating between targets in this iteration though should be following existing commitment framework as outlined in part a). </p><p>Examples of targets could include: </p><p>• Land use change, specifically deforestation and conversion, using the Accountability Framework Initiative • Resource exploitation, for example specifically water quantity and quality, using contextual targets for water • Bonn Challenge commitments exist in many countries and aim to have 350 million hectares of degraded land under restoration by 2030. </p><p>• Ecosystem integrity, specifically on working lands using regenerative agricultural practices in line with the European Commission.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B06_Ecosystem_Restoration.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B06_EC_Ecosystem_Restoration_Time_Bound_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114084,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B06.ED Ecosystem Restoration Project Outcomes (areas beyond own operations/relationships)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B06_ED_Ecosystem_Restoration_Project_Outcomes_areas_beyond_own_operations_relationships.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B06.ED Ecosystem Restoration Project Outcomes (areas beyond own operations/relationships)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose details and outcomes of ecosystem restoration projects in areas affected by its own operations or upstream business relationships and disclose ecosystem restoration efforts beyond areas affected by its own operations or upstream business relationships (e.g. compensation or offset mechanisms)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company demonstrates restoration activities in its value chain across all relevant ecosystems. </p><p>Rationale: The UN has declared the ten years to 2030 the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration – a rallying call for the protection and restoration of ecosystems for the benefit of both people and nature. This indicator aligns with the SBTN interim targets on ensuring that a proportion of natural or semi-natural habitats are retained or regenerated in working lands from 2020, and areas under restoration in all ecosystems are increased.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>This metric looks beyond the company's value chain. Companies may refer to and align with the IUCN policy regarding offsets.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B06_Ecosystem_Restoration.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B06_ED_Ecosystem_Restoration_Project_Outcomes_areas_beyond_own_operations_relationships+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114096,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B07.EA Resource Exploitation and Circularity Performance Evidence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_EA_Resource_Exploitation_and_Circularity_Performance_Evidence.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B07.EA Resource Exploitation and Circularity Performance Evidence",
      "question": "Does the company provide qualitative evidence of working towards a circular economy at distinct phases of its products' life cycle?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company demonstrates it is working towards decoupling economic prosperity from resource consumption and environmental degradation. </p><p>Rationale: The current dependence on a linear economy is largely responsible for most impacts on nature and biodiversity. Some 90% of biodiversity loss is caused by the way we extract and process materials, fuels and food (UNEP, 2019). Approximately 60 billion tons of renewable and nonrenewable resources are extracted yearly, a 15% augmentation since the 1980s (IPBES, 2019). Furthermore, following land and sea use change, the largest negative impact on nature is the direct exploitation, especially overexploitation, of natural resources and organisms via harvesting, logging, hunting and fishing (IPBES, 2019). By decoupling economic prosperity from resource consumption and environmental degradation, circularity offers opportunities for new and better growth that not only help safeguard and rebuild biodiversity but also provide benefits. </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric examples covering at least two of the following are required: </p><p>• Avoid: Inputs, Recycled inputs/Material sourcing/other. (if b met, this is met) </p><p>• Reduce: Design/Manufacturing/More efficient </p><p>• Re-Use & Repair. With this, actions must not be one-off programmes; they must be at multiple locations and all year-round. Pilots do not count. </p><p>• Recycling/Waste: GRI 306, breakdown of waste and destination </p><p>Examples of not met: </p><p>• Lifecycle assessments and certifications alone are insufficient. </p><p>• The use of renewable energy </p><p>• Mentions of partnerships/alliances/associations without specific data on role and projects done by the company • Initiatives that require specific actions from consumers and/or only at employee level (such as volunteer programs). </p><p>Keywords: Circular, Input, Reuse, Recycling</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable",
        "Partially"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_Resource_exploitation_and_circularity_performance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_EA_Resource_Exploitation_and_Circularity_Performance_Evidence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114108,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B07.EB Resource Exploitation and Circularity Performance Input Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_EB_Resource_Exploitation_and_Circularity_Performance_Input_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B07.EB Resource Exploitation and Circularity Performance Input Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its inputs, including its material footprint, according to an international standard?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company demonstrates it is working towards decoupling economic prosperity from resource consumption and environmental degradation. </p><p>Rationale: The current dependence on a linear economy is largely responsible for most impacts on nature and biodiversity. Some 90% of biodiversity loss is caused by the way we extract and process materials, fuels and food (UNEP, 2019). Approximately 60 billion tons of renewable and nonrenewable resources are extracted yearly, a 15% augmentation since the 1980s (IPBES, 2019). Furthermore, following land and sea use change, the largest negative impact on nature is the direct exploitation, especially overexploitation, of natural resources and organisms via harvesting, logging, hunting and fishing (IPBES, 2019). By decoupling economic prosperity from resource consumption and environmental degradation, circularity offers opportunities for new and better growth that not only help safeguard and rebuild biodiversity but also provide benefits. </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company reports on materials used by weight or volume, recycled inputs (reused if there is), basic disclosure on material footprint elements (especially fuel and biomass). Quantitative breakdown of inputs is needed. Can be partially met. </p><p>GRI 301 -Inputs: </p><p>• Materials used by weight or volume </p><p>• Distinction renewable, non-renewable </p><p>• Recycled inputs </p><p>Keywords: Inputs, raw materials, resource use, fuel, biomass, inputs</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable",
        "Partially"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_Resource_exploitation_and_circularity_performance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_EB_Resource_Exploitation_and_Circularity_Performance_Input_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114120,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B07.EC Resource Exploitation and Circularity Performance Organism Exploitation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_EC_Resource_Exploitation_and_Circularity_Performance_Organism_Exploitation.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B07.EC Resource Exploitation and Circularity Performance Organism Exploitation",
      "question": "Does the company disclose which organisms it directly exploits for commercial uses, including wild animal and plant species?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company demonstrates it is working towards decoupling economic prosperity from resource consumption and environmental degradation. </p><p>Rationale: The current dependence on a linear economy is largely responsible for most impacts on nature and biodiversity. Some 90% of biodiversity loss is caused by the way we extract and process materials, fuels and food (UNEP, 2019). Approximately 60 billion tons of renewable and nonrenewable resources are extracted yearly, a 15% augmentation since the 1980s (IPBES, 2019). Furthermore, following land and sea use change, the largest negative impact on nature is the direct exploitation, especially overexploitation, of natural resources and organisms via harvesting, logging, hunting and fishing (IPBES, 2019). By decoupling economic prosperity from resource consumption and environmental degradation, circularity offers opportunities for new and better growth that not only help safeguard and rebuild biodiversity but also provide benefits. </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company should specify species (for example, saying ‘'mammals', ‘rodents', ‘reptiles' is not enough).</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_Resource_exploitation_and_circularity_performance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_EC_Resource_Exploitation_and_Circularity_Performance_Organism_Exploitation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114132,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B07.ED Resource Exploitation and Circularity Performance Management Plan",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_ED_Resource_Exploitation_and_Circularity_Performance_Management_Plan.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B07.ED Resource Exploitation and Circularity Performance Management Plan",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a management plan related to the direct exploitation of resources, to avoid overexploitation and the use of threatened species?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]]</p>\r\n<p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p>\r\n<p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company demonstrates it is working towards decoupling economic prosperity from resource consumption and environmental degradation.</p>\r\n<p>Rationale: The current dependence on a linear economy is largely responsible for most impacts on nature and biodiversity. Some 90% of biodiversity loss is caused by the way we extract and process materials, fuels and food (UNEP, 2019). Approximately 60 billion tons of renewable and nonrenewable resources are extracted yearly, a 15% augmentation since the 1980s (IPBES, 2019). Furthermore, following land and sea use change, the largest negative impact on nature is the direct exploitation, especially overexploitation, of natural resources and organisms via harvesting, logging, hunting and fishing (IPBES, 2019). By decoupling economic prosperity from resource consumption and environmental degradation, circularity offers opportunities for new and better growth that not only help safeguard and rebuild biodiversity but also provide benefits.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p>\r\n<p>This metric should include targets and metrics.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_Resource_exploitation_and_circularity_performance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_ED_Resource_Exploitation_and_Circularity_Performance_Management_Plan+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114144,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B07.EE Resource Exploitation and Circularity Performance Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_EE_Resource_Exploitation_and_Circularity_Performance_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B07.EE Resource Exploitation and Circularity Performance Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report quantitatively on its group-wide circularity performance (e.g. circular material productivity)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company demonstrates it is working towards decoupling economic prosperity from resource consumption and environmental degradation. </p><p>Rationale: The current dependence on a linear economy is largely responsible for most impacts on nature and biodiversity. Some 90% of biodiversity loss is caused by the way we extract and process materials, fuels and food (UNEP, 2019). Approximately 60 billion tons of renewable and nonrenewable resources are extracted yearly, a 15% augmentation since the 1980s (IPBES, 2019). Furthermore, following land and sea use change, the largest negative impact on nature is the direct exploitation, especially overexploitation, of natural resources and organisms via harvesting, logging, hunting and fishing (IPBES, 2019). By decoupling economic prosperity from resource consumption and environmental degradation, circularity offers opportunities for new and better growth that not only help safeguard and rebuild biodiversity but also provide benefits. </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric partially met could include Environment Profit & Losses with clear circular link (methodology used needs to be clear and accessible), turnover of products based on renewable resources and/or sustainable materials (if not at group-level but clear methodology). Can be partially met. </p><p>Keywords: CTI revenue, circular material productivity</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable",
        "Partially"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_Resource_exploitation_and_circularity_performance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_EE_Resource_Exploitation_and_Circularity_Performance_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114156,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B07.EF Resource Exploitation and Circularity Performance Reporting Decoupling Finance & Consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_EF_Resource_Exploitation_and_Circularity_Performance_Reporting_Decoupling_Finance_Consumption.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B07.EF Resource Exploitation and Circularity Performance Reporting Decoupling Finance & Consumption",
      "question": "Does the company report quantitatively on its group-wide circularity performance and demonstrate it is decoupling financial performance and linear resource consumption?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p>\r\n<p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p>\r\n<p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company demonstrates it is working towards decoupling economic prosperity from resource consumption and environmental degradation. </p>\r\n<p>Rationale: The current dependence on a linear economy is largely responsible for most impacts on nature and biodiversity. Some 90% of biodiversity loss is caused by the way we extract and process materials, fuels and food (UNEP, 2019). Approximately 60 billion tons of renewable and nonrenewable resources are extracted yearly, a 15% augmentation since the 1980s (IPBES, 2019). Furthermore, following land and sea use change, the largest negative impact on nature is the direct exploitation, especially overexploitation, of natural resources and organisms via harvesting, logging, hunting and fishing (IPBES, 2019). By decoupling economic prosperity from resource consumption and environmental degradation, circularity offers opportunities for new and better growth that not only help safeguard and rebuild biodiversity but also provide benefits. </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p>\r\n<p>For this metric, need to express quantification of financial results on the organisation: revenues coming from linear or circular inflows compared to all revenues. Need to meet element e. as without strong numbers, it would mean nothing and to show progress (moving away from linear economy). </p>\r\n<p>Keywords: CTI revenue, circular material productivity</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable",
        "Partially"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_Resource_exploitation_and_circularity_performance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_EF_Resource_Exploitation_and_Circularity_Performance_Reporting_Decoupling_Finance_Consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114168,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B08.EA Improving Soil Health and Increasing Agrobiodiversity Evidence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_EA_Improving_Soil_Health_and_Increasing_Agrobiodiversity_Evidence.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B08.EA Improving Soil Health and Increasing Agrobiodiversity Evidence",
      "question": "Does the company provide qualitative evidence on improving soil health and/or increase agrobiodiversity in its production and/or sourcing practices?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company adopts practices that reduce soil degradation and improve soil health across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: Over 40% of living organisms in terrestrial ecosystems associate directly with soils during their life cycle, making soils among the most important reservoirs of biodiversity (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). However, current unsustainable agricultural practices and other business activities have led to the degradation of around one-third of the world's soil, resulting in significant negative impacts on biodiversity and soil health (TEEB, 2018). This indicator focuses on practices that reduce soil degradation and encourage regeneration in the system by improving soil health and agrobiodiversity.These include helping to tackle climate change, improving air and water quality and reducing the cost of accessing goods and services.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric improving soil health includes reducing soil pollution, soil erosion, soil fertility reduction, soil salinization or waterlogging. Reporting can include regenerative practices on soil health parameters, such as soil organic carbon, soil pH, species diversity. Soil investigation does not count as met. This includes practices that involve the sustainable use of biodiversity in agriculture, food production, sourcing practices of commodities, manufacturing-sites for extractive industries. </p><p>Increasing agrobiodiversity includes adopting techniques such as crop rotation, mixed farming systems diversity, intercropping, crop livestock farming systems to increase the diversity and variety of plants, animals, and microorganisms. </p><p>Keywords: ‘Soil health', ‘regenerative practices', ‘regenerative agriculture', ‘soil fertility', ‘soil pollution'</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Soil Contamination",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_Soil_Health.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_EA_Improving_Soil_Health_and_Increasing_Agrobiodiversity_Evidence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114180,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B08.EB Improving Soil Health and Agrobiodiversity Evidence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_EB_Improving_Soil_Health_and_Agrobiodiversity_Evidence.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B08.EB Improving Soil Health and Agrobiodiversity Evidence",
      "question": "Does the company provide quantitative evidence on improving soil health and/or agrobiodiversity in its production and/or sourcing practices?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company adopts practices that reduce soil degradation and improve soil health across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: Over 40% of living organisms in terrestrial ecosystems associate directly with soils during their life cycle, making soils among the most important reservoirs of biodiversity (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). However, current unsustainable agricultural practices and other business activities have led to the degradation of around one-third of the world's soil, resulting in significant negative impacts on biodiversity and soil health (TEEB, 2018). This indicator focuses on practices that reduce soil degradation and encourage regeneration in the system by improving soil health and agrobiodiversity.These include helping to tackle climate change, improving air and water quality and reducing the cost of accessing goods and services.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric see guidelines on soil health also but the company is using quantitative metrics, such as: soil health parameters, soil organic carbon, soil pH, species diversity (increase in the variety of plants, animals and microorganisms etc).</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Soil Contamination",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_Soil_Health.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_EB_Improving_Soil_Health_and_Agrobiodiversity_Evidence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114192,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B08.EC Improving Soil Health Targets Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_EC_Improving_Soil_Health_Targets_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B08.EC Improving Soil Health Targets Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company have a target to improve soil health in its production and/or sourcing practices, and reports progress against it?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company adopts practices that reduce soil degradation and improve soil health across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: Over 40% of living organisms in terrestrial ecosystems associate directly with soils during their life cycle, making soils among the most important reservoirs of biodiversity (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). However, current unsustainable agricultural practices and other business activities have led to the degradation of around one-third of the world's soil, resulting in significant negative impacts on biodiversity and soil health (TEEB, 2018). This indicator focuses on practices that reduce soil degradation and encourage regeneration in the system by improving soil health and agrobiodiversity.These include helping to tackle climate change, improving air and water quality and reducing the cost of accessing goods and services.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric WBA is not differentiating between targets here.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_Soil_Health.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_EC_Improving_Soil_Health_Targets_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114204,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B08.ED Increasing Agrobiodiversity Targets Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_ED_Increasing_Agrobiodiversity_Targets_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B08.ED Increasing Agrobiodiversity Targets Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company have a target to increase agrobiodiversity in its production and/or sourcing practices, and reports progress against it?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company adopts practices that reduce soil degradation and improve soil health across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: Over 40% of living organisms in terrestrial ecosystems associate directly with soils during their life cycle, making soils among the most important reservoirs of biodiversity (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). However, current unsustainable agricultural practices and other business activities have led to the degradation of around one-third of the world's soil, resulting in significant negative impacts on biodiversity and soil health (TEEB, 2018). This indicator focuses on practices that reduce soil degradation and encourage regeneration in the system by improving soil health and agrobiodiversity.These include helping to tackle climate change, improving air and water quality and reducing the cost of accessing goods and services.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Monoculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_Soil_Health.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_ED_Increasing_Agrobiodiversity_Targets_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114216,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B08.EE Soil Health and Agrobiodiversity Impact",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_EE_Soil_Health_and_Agrobiodiversity_Impact.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B08.EE Soil Health and Agrobiodiversity Impact",
      "question": "Does the company disclose quantifiable data on its impact on soil health and/or agrobiodiversity in its production and/or sourcing practices?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company adopts practices that reduce soil degradation and improve soil health across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: Over 40% of living organisms in terrestrial ecosystems associate directly with soils during their life cycle, making soils among the most important reservoirs of biodiversity (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). However, current unsustainable agricultural practices and other business activities have led to the degradation of around one-third of the world's soil, resulting in significant negative impacts on biodiversity and soil health (TEEB, 2018). This indicator focuses on practices that reduce soil degradation and encourage regeneration in the system by improving soil health and agrobiodiversity.These include helping to tackle climate change, improving air and water quality and reducing the cost of accessing goods and services.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric improving soil health includes reducing soil pollution, soil erosion, soil fertility reduction, soil salinization or waterlogging. Reporting can include regenerative practices on soil health parameters, such as soil organic carbon, soil pH, species diversity. For extractive industries, elements can include quantifiable data on its impact on soil health, disclosing metrics such as soil organic matter and carbon and reduction of land affected by erosion, and agrobiodiversity, such as the increase in the variety of plants, animals and microorganisms. </p><p>Example of such targets/evidence includes companies disclosing x% of their land is currently under regenerative agriculture, measuring soil health after they have left extractive sites, levels of (agro-biodiversity.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Soil Contamination",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_Soil_Health.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_EE_Soil_Health_and_Agrobiodiversity_Impact+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114228,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B09.EA Water Withdrawal Reductions Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_EA_Water_Withdrawal_Reductions_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B09.EA Water Withdrawal Reductions Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose quantitative reductions in water withdrawal across its own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces water withdrawal across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: One-fifth of the world's river basins are experiencing significant changes in surface water available in the last five years (UN Water, 2021). Increasing exploitation of water resources is likely to lead to disruptions in ecosystem services in terms of renewing and purifying water resources. This indicator is aligned with the SBTN interim target to reduce water withdrawal in the most material parts of the value chain in line with environmental flow needs by 2030.</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must show year-on-year reduction. Aggregated reduction, for example from a baseline year, does not count. For this iteration of the benchmark, we accept water consumption for this element.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_Water_withdrawal.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_EA_Water_Withdrawal_Reductions_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114240,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B09.EB Water Withdrawal Reduction Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_EB_Water_Withdrawal_Reduction_Target.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B09.EB Water Withdrawal Reduction Target",
      "question": "Does the company have a target to reduce water withdrawal across its own operations and reports progress against the target?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces water withdrawal across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: One-fifth of the world's river basins are experiencing significant changes in surface water available in the last five years (UN Water, 2021). Increasing exploitation of water resources is likely to lead to disruptions in ecosystem services in terms of renewing and purifying water resources. This indicator is aligned with the SBTN interim target to reduce water withdrawal in the most material parts of the value chain in line with environmental flow needs by 2030.</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company's targets must show absolute reduction for water use. Targets tied to intensity, production, or profit does not count. Targeting specific areas (such as water stressed areas) do not count. Targets aimed at maintaining withdrawal levels does not count. For this iteration of the benchmark, we accept water consumption for this element.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_Water_withdrawal.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_EB_Water_Withdrawal_Reduction_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114252,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B09.EC Water-Stressed Area dependency",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_EC_Water_Stressed_Area_dependency.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B09.EC Water-Stressed Area dependency",
      "question": "Does the company provide evidence of dependency on water-stressed areas across its own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces water withdrawal across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: One-fifth of the world's river basins are experiencing significant changes in surface water available in the last five years (UN Water, 2021). Increasing exploitation of water resources is likely to lead to disruptions in ecosystem services in terms of renewing and purifying water resources. This indicator is aligned with the SBTN interim target to reduce water withdrawal in the most material parts of the value chain in line with environmental flow needs by 2030.</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must mention a water stress assessment, usually the WRI Aqueduct Tool or the WWF Water Risk Filter, but other assessments are accepted. Disclosure based on estimates do not count. If a company reports zero dependency on water-stressed areas, they get points for this and element (d) if there is evidence of assessment.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_Water_withdrawal.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_EC_Water_Stressed_Area_dependency+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114264,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B09.ED Water Withdrawal From Water-Stressed Areas",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_ED_Water_Withdrawal_From_Water_Stressed_Areas.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B09.ED Water Withdrawal From Water-Stressed Areas",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the proportion of withdrawals from water-stressed areas across its own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces water withdrawal across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: One-fifth of the world's river basins are experiencing significant changes in surface water available in the last five years (UN Water, 2021). Increasing exploitation of water resources is likely to lead to disruptions in ecosystem services in terms of renewing and purifying water resources. This indicator is aligned with the SBTN interim target to reduce water withdrawal in the most material parts of the value chain in line with environmental flow needs by 2030.</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric The best practice is site-specific breakdowns, but for this iteration, an aggregated proportion is enough to score.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_Water_withdrawal.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_ED_Water_Withdrawal_From_Water_Stressed_Areas+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114276,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B09.EE Water Withdrawal Reduction Engagement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_EE_Water_Withdrawal_Reduction_Engagement.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B09.EE Water Withdrawal Reduction Engagement",
      "question": "Does the company provide evidence of engaging with suppliers to reduce water withdrawal?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces water withdrawal across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: One-fifth of the world's river basins are experiencing significant changes in surface water available in the last five years (UN Water, 2021). Increasing exploitation of water resources is likely to lead to disruptions in ecosystem services in terms of renewing and purifying water resources. This indicator is aligned with the SBTN interim target to reduce water withdrawal in the most material parts of the value chain in line with environmental flow needs by 2030.</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must demonstrate efforts such as a policy or programme. General language like engagement or dialogue does not count.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_Water_withdrawal.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_EE_Water_Withdrawal_Reduction_Engagement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114288,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B09.EF Water-Stressed Area Dependency in Supply Chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_EF_Water_Stressed_Area_Dependency_in_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B09.EF Water-Stressed Area Dependency in Supply Chain",
      "question": "Does the company provide evidence of dependency on water-stressed areas in its supply chain, have a target to engage with suppliers on the management of water-stressed areas, and reports progress against it?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces water withdrawal across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: One-fifth of the world's river basins are experiencing significant changes in surface water available in the last five years (UN Water, 2021). Increasing exploitation of water resources is likely to lead to disruptions in ecosystem services in terms of renewing and purifying water resources. This indicator is aligned with the SBTN interim target to reduce water withdrawal in the most material parts of the value chain in line with environmental flow needs by 2030.</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric companies need to have all elements to score.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_Water_withdrawal.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_EF_Water_Stressed_Area_Dependency_in_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114300,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B10.EA Water Quality Pressure Reduction",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B10_EA_Water_Quality_Pressure_Reduction.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B10.EA Water Quality Pressure Reduction",
      "question": "Does the company provide qualitative evidence of reducing water quality pressures?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces water quality pressures across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: Approximately 80% of global wastewater is untreated when released back into the environment, causing significant negative effects on both ecosystem functioning and human health (IUCN, n.d.). This indicator is aligned with the SBTN interim target to reduce water quality pressures in high-impact parts of the value chain in line with good ambient water quality by 2030. </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric examples of qualitative evidence include policies, programmes, using new technology, or improving processes. the company must show actions beyond legal compliance.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B10Water_quality.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B10_EA_Water_Quality_Pressure_Reduction+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114312,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B10.EB Discharge Water Quality Management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B10_EB_Discharge_Water_Quality_Management.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B10.EB Discharge Water Quality Management",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its processes for managing and monitoring discharge water quality?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces water quality pressures across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: Approximately 80% of global wastewater is untreated when released back into the environment, causing significant negative effects on both ecosystem functioning and human health (IUCN, n.d.). This indicator is aligned with the SBTN interim target to reduce water quality pressures in high-impact parts of the value chain in line with good ambient water quality by 2030. </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must describe what the process involves or refer to external certifications they follow (such as ISO). Disclosure of having a process alone is not enough to score.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B10Water_quality.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B10_EB_Discharge_Water_Quality_Management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114324,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B10.EC Water Quality Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B10_EC_Water_Quality_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B10.EC Water Quality Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report regularly on water quality parameters?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces water quality pressures across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: Approximately 80% of global wastewater is untreated when released back into the environment, causing significant negative effects on both ecosystem functioning and human health (IUCN, n.d.). This indicator is aligned with the SBTN interim target to reduce water quality pressures in high-impact parts of the value chain in line with good ambient water quality by 2030. </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric on this iteration, reporting on just one element is sufficient, but best practice should be comprehensive.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B10Water_quality.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B10_EC_Water_Quality_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114336,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B10.ED Water Quality Pressure Reduction Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B10_ED_Water_Quality_Pressure_Reduction_Targets.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B10.ED Water Quality Pressure Reduction Targets",
      "question": "Does the company have targets to reduce water quality pressures and reports progress against them?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces water quality pressures across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: Approximately 80% of global wastewater is untreated when released back into the environment, causing significant negative effects on both ecosystem functioning and human health (IUCN, n.d.). This indicator is aligned with the SBTN interim target to reduce water quality pressures in high-impact parts of the value chain in line with good ambient water quality by 2030. </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must have both parts to score.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B10Water_quality.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B10_ED_Water_Quality_Pressure_Reduction_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114348,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B11.EA Hazardous Substances Reduction Evidence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_EA_Hazardous_Substances_Reduction_Evidence.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B11.EA Hazardous Substances Reduction Evidence",
      "question": "Does the company provide qualitative evidence of reducing the production of hazardous substances?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces the production of hazardous substances and/or hazardous waste across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: Pollution is among the primary drivers of biodiversity loss, with large amounts of hazardous chemicals and other pollutants affecting ecosystem function and leading to population decline (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). Persistence of such hazardous substances and waste in the environment can lead to uptake by wildlife and humans resulting in reproductive and carcinogenic effects. As such, this indicator covers the production and management of hazardous substances as well as waste management.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric examples for this element could include policies aimed at reducing hazardous substances, or evidence of having achieved reduction of hazardous substances. the company must show efforts beyond legal compliance. Partnerships, such as those with the ZDHC, does not count by itself. However, if the company shows efforts to use the partnership towards further action, such as supply chain engagement, policies, or programmes, then it could score for this indicator.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_Hazardous_substances_and_waste.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_EA_Hazardous_Substances_Reduction_Evidence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114360,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B11.EB Hazardous Substances Phase-Out Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_EB_Hazardous_Substances_Phase_Out_Targets.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B11.EB Hazardous Substances Phase-Out Targets",
      "question": "Does the company have targets to phase out the production of hazardous substances or increase the production of safer alternatives and reports progress against the targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces the production of hazardous substances and/or hazardous waste across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: Pollution is among the primary drivers of biodiversity loss, with large amounts of hazardous chemicals and other pollutants affecting ecosystem function and leading to population decline (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). Persistence of such hazardous substances and waste in the environment can lead to uptake by wildlife and humans resulting in reproductive and carcinogenic effects. As such, this indicator covers the production and management of hazardous substances as well as waste management.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric partnerships, such as those with the ZDHC, does not count by itself. However, if the company shows efforts to use the ZDHC guidelines as a methodology for setting targets, then it could score for this indicator.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_Hazardous_substances_and_waste.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_EB_Hazardous_Substances_Phase_Out_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114372,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B11.EC SVHC (substance of very high concern) Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_EC_SVHC_substance_of_very_high_concern_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B11.EC SVHC (substance of very high concern) Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company commit not to develop or market new chemicals or products with SVHC (substance of very high concern) properties?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces the production of hazardous substances and/or hazardous waste across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: Pollution is among the primary drivers of biodiversity loss, with large amounts of hazardous chemicals and other pollutants affecting ecosystem function and leading to population decline (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). Persistence of such hazardous substances and waste in the environment can lead to uptake by wildlife and humans resulting in reproductive and carcinogenic effects. As such, this indicator covers the production and management of hazardous substances as well as waste management.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must show efforts beyond legal compliance.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_Hazardous_substances_and_waste.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_EC_SVHC_substance_of_very_high_concern_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114384,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B11.ED Hazardous Waste Reduction Evidence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_ED_Hazardous_Waste_Reduction_Evidence.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B11.ED Hazardous Waste Reduction Evidence",
      "question": "Does the company provide qualitative evidence of reducing the production of hazardous waste?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces the production of hazardous substances and/or hazardous waste across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: Pollution is among the primary drivers of biodiversity loss, with large amounts of hazardous chemicals and other pollutants affecting ecosystem function and leading to population decline (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). Persistence of such hazardous substances and waste in the environment can lead to uptake by wildlife and humans resulting in reproductive and carcinogenic effects. As such, this indicator covers the production and management of hazardous substances as well as waste management.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric examples of this could include processes or policies.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_Hazardous_substances_and_waste.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_ED_Hazardous_Waste_Reduction_Evidence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114396,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B11.EE Hazardous Waste Reduction Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_EE_Hazardous_Waste_Reduction_Targets.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B11.EE Hazardous Waste Reduction Targets",
      "question": "Does the company have targets to reduce total amounts of hazardous waste and reports progress against them?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces the production of hazardous substances and/or hazardous waste across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: Pollution is among the primary drivers of biodiversity loss, with large amounts of hazardous chemicals and other pollutants affecting ecosystem function and leading to population decline (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). Persistence of such hazardous substances and waste in the environment can lead to uptake by wildlife and humans resulting in reproductive and carcinogenic effects. As such, this indicator covers the production and management of hazardous substances as well as waste management.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must report against the progress, and include a baseline year.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_Hazardous_substances_and_waste.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_EE_Hazardous_Waste_Reduction_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114408,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B11.EF Hazardous Waste Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_EF_Hazardous_Waste_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B11.EF Hazardous Waste Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report on (i) the proportion of hazardous waste treated to reduce pollution compared to total waste, (ii) hazardous waste diverted from disposal and (iii) directed to disposal?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces the production of hazardous substances and/or hazardous waste across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: Pollution is among the primary drivers of biodiversity loss, with large amounts of hazardous chemicals and other pollutants affecting ecosystem function and leading to population decline (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). Persistence of such hazardous substances and waste in the environment can lead to uptake by wildlife and humans resulting in reproductive and carcinogenic effects. As such, this indicator covers the production and management of hazardous substances as well as waste management.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must report information on the total amount of waste generated (including non-hazardous and if diverted, disposal or not by type), the proportion of this that was diverted from disposal (for example, through reusing, recycling and/or recovering) and the proportion of waste disposed by type (such as incineration or landfilling).</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_Hazardous_substances_and_waste.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_EF_Hazardous_Waste_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114420,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B12.EA Plastic Use and Waste Reduction Qualitative Evidence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_EA_Plastic_Use_and_Waste_Reduction_Qualitative_Evidence.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B12.EA Plastic Use and Waste Reduction Qualitative Evidence",
      "question": "Does the company provide qualitative evidence of reducing plastic use and waste in its own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]]</p>\r\n<p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">This metric relates to Indicator: The company reduces plastic use and waste across the most material parts of its value chain. </span></p>\r\n<p>Rationale:Since the 1980s, plastic pollution is estimated to have increased tenfold (IPBES, 2018). Estimates suggest that global plastic production will double by 2050, of which approximately 8 million tonnes will end up as marine debris (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). The debris breaks into microplastics that are then ingested by marine organisms, leading to toxic effects on their feeding, growth and reproductive patterns. Due to plastic’s prolonged negative impact on ecosystems and biodiversity, this indicator focuses on reducing plastic use and waste from the private sector through globally applicable commitments and targets. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p>\r\n<p>For this metric the focus is on the most relevant part of the company's material chain. For producers, it should relate to their own products. Examples include commitments, policies, or activities. Compostable plastics can be accepted, but recyclable, biodegradable, and bioplastics do not count. Recycling, volunteering, or partnership activities do not count.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_Plastic_use_and_waste.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_EA_Plastic_Use_and_Waste_Reduction_Qualitative_Evidence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114432,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B12.EB Plastic Use and Waste Reduction Quantitative Evidence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_EB_Plastic_Use_and_Waste_Reduction_Quantitative_Evidence.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B12.EB Plastic Use and Waste Reduction Quantitative Evidence",
      "question": "Does the company provide quantitative evidence of reducing plastic use and waste in its own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]]</p>\r\n<p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p>\r\n<p>This metric relates to Indicator: The company reduces plastic use and waste across the most material parts of its value chain. </p>\r\n<p>Rationale:Since the 1980s, plastic pollution is estimated to have increased tenfold (IPBES, 2018). Estimates suggest that global plastic production will double by 2050, of which approximately 8 million tonnes will end up as marine debris (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). The debris breaks into microplastics that are then ingested by marine organisms, leading to toxic effects on their feeding, growth and reproductive patterns. Due to plastic’s prolonged negative impact on ecosystems and biodiversity, this indicator focuses on reducing plastic use and waste from the private sector through globally applicable commitments and targets. </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p>\r\n<p>For this metric the focus is on the most relevant part of its value chain for each company. Metrics tied to intensity of plastic use are accepted.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_Plastic_use_and_waste.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_EB_Plastic_Use_and_Waste_Reduction_Quantitative_Evidence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114444,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B12.EC Plastic Use and Waste Reduction Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_EC_Plastic_Use_and_Waste_Reduction_Targets.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B12.EC Plastic Use and Waste Reduction Targets",
      "question": "Does the company have targets regarding the reduction of virgin polymer production or overall plastic use and waste, or an increase in the proportion of reusable or refillable packaging, and reports against the targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]]</p>\r\n<p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p>\r\n<p>This metric relates to Indicator: The company reduces plastic use and waste across the most material parts of its value chain. </p>\r\n<p>Rationale:Since the 1980s, plastic pollution is estimated to have increased tenfold (IPBES, 2018). Estimates suggest that global plastic production will double by 2050, of which approximately 8 million tonnes will end up as marine debris (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). The debris breaks into microplastics that are then ingested by marine organisms, leading to toxic effects on their feeding, growth and reproductive patterns. Due to plastic’s prolonged negative impact on ecosystems and biodiversity, this indicator focuses on reducing plastic use and waste from the private sector through globally applicable commitments and targets. </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p>\r\n<p>For this metric the focus is on the most relevant part of its value chain for each company. The targets must be set at the group level. The targets should aim for absolute reduction. Targets tied to intensity are not accepted.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_Plastic_use_and_waste.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_EC_Plastic_Use_and_Waste_Reduction_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114456,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B12.ED Plastic Use Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_ED_Plastic_Use_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B12.ED Plastic Use Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report on the proportion of reused or recycled products, or proportion of virgin polymer use, or the proportion of single-use plastics?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]]</p>\r\n<p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p>\r\n<p>This metric relates to Indicator: The company reduces plastic use and waste across the most material parts of its value chain. </p>\r\n<p>Rationale:Since the 1980s, plastic pollution is estimated to have increased tenfold (IPBES, 2018). Estimates suggest that global plastic production will double by 2050, of which approximately 8 million tonnes will end up as marine debris (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). The debris breaks into microplastics that are then ingested by marine organisms, leading to toxic effects on their feeding, growth and reproductive patterns. Due to plastic’s prolonged negative impact on ecosystems and biodiversity, this indicator focuses on reducing plastic use and waste from the private sector through globally applicable commitments and targets. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p>\r\n<p>For this metric the focus is on the most relevant part of its value chain for each company. This indicator only includes plastic. Metrics include any of the following: proportion of reused or recycled products, proportion of virgin polymer use, or proportion of single-use plastics. the company should report on the more material topic, either production or packaging. For example, a fashion company disclosing metrics on plastic packaging is not met.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_Plastic_use_and_waste.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_ED_Plastic_Use_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114468,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B12.EE Plastic Waste Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_EE_Plastic_Waste_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B12.EE Plastic Waste Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report on the amount of plastic waste generated, and proportions directed from or to disposal?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]]</p>\r\n<p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p>\r\n<p>This metric relates to Indicator: The company reduces plastic use and waste across the most material parts of its value chain. </p>\r\n<p>Rationale:Since the 1980s, plastic pollution is estimated to have increased tenfold (IPBES, 2018). Estimates suggest that global plastic production will double by 2050, of which approximately 8 million tonnes will end up as marine debris (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). The debris breaks into microplastics that are then ingested by marine organisms, leading to toxic effects on their feeding, growth and reproductive patterns. Due to plastic’s prolonged negative impact on ecosystems and biodiversity, this indicator focuses on reducing plastic use and waste from the private sector through globally applicable commitments and targets. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p>\r\n<p>For this metric the focus is on the most relevant part of its value chain for each company.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_Plastic_use_and_waste.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_EE_Plastic_Waste_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114480,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B12.EF Plastic Use and Waste Reduction Evidence Upstream",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_EF_Plastic_Use_and_Waste_Reduction_Evidence_Upstream.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B12.EF Plastic Use and Waste Reduction Evidence Upstream",
      "question": "Does the company provide evidence of actions to reduce plastic use and waste in its upstream activities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]]</p>\r\n<p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p>\r\n<p>This metric relates to Indicator: The company reduces plastic use and waste across the most material parts of its value chain. </p>\r\n<p>Rationale:Since the 1980s, plastic pollution is estimated to have increased tenfold (IPBES, 2018). Estimates suggest that global plastic production will double by 2050, of which approximately 8 million tonnes will end up as marine debris (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). The debris breaks into microplastics that are then ingested by marine organisms, leading to toxic effects on their feeding, growth and reproductive patterns. Due to plastic’s prolonged negative impact on ecosystems and biodiversity, this indicator focuses on reducing plastic use and waste from the private sector through globally applicable commitments and targets. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p>\r\n<p>For this metric examples include, working with suppliers to reduce plastic and waste.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_Plastic_use_and_waste.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_EF_Plastic_Use_and_Waste_Reduction_Evidence_Upstream+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114492,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B12.EG Plastic Use and Waste Reduction Evidence Downstream",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_EG_Plastic_Use_and_Waste_Reduction_Evidence_Downstream.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B12.EG Plastic Use and Waste Reduction Evidence Downstream",
      "question": "Does the company provide evidence of actions to reduce plastic use and waste in its downstream activities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]]</p>\r\n<p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p>\r\n<p>This metric relates to Indicator: The company reduces plastic use and waste across the most material parts of its value chain. </p>\r\n<p>Rationale:Since the 1980s, plastic pollution is estimated to have increased tenfold (IPBES, 2018). Estimates suggest that global plastic production will double by 2050, of which approximately 8 million tonnes will end up as marine debris (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). The debris breaks into microplastics that are then ingested by marine organisms, leading to toxic effects on their feeding, growth and reproductive patterns. Due to plastic’s prolonged negative impact on ecosystems and biodiversity, this indicator focuses on reducing plastic use and waste from the private sector through globally applicable commitments and targets. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p>\r\n<p>For this metric examples include, reducing plastic waste at consumer-level.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_Plastic_use_and_waste.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_EG_Plastic_Use_and_Waste_Reduction_Evidence_Downstream+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114504,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B13.EA Air Pollutants Reduction Evidence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_EA_Air_Pollutants_Reduction_Evidence.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B13.EA Air Pollutants Reduction Evidence",
      "question": "Does the company provide qualitative evidence of reducing air pollutants across the most material parts of its value chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces the production of air pollutants across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: The production of air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides and sulphur oxides, through companies' operations and business activities, has adverse effects on the climate, habitats, biodiversity, agriculture, air quality and the health of both animals and humans (GRI, 2021). Moreover, the increase in certain air pollutants can disrupt the provision of ecosystem services, for example nutrient cycling and carbon cycling, but also water supply, on which planetary and human life depends. As such, this indicator measures companies' approach to measuring and reducing harmful air pollutants across the value chain, including beyond national and international regulations. </p><p> </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric qualitative evidence includes descriptive evidence of measures taken to reduce non-GHG emissions across the most material parts of the company's value chain. Quantitative reductions in non-GHG emissions are also accepted.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_Air_pollutants.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_EA_Air_Pollutants_Reduction_Evidence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114516,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B13.EB Air Pollutants Management and Monitoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_EB_Air_Pollutants_Management_and_Monitoring.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B13.EB Air Pollutants Management and Monitoring",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its management and monitoring processes to measure and reduce its air pollutants?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces the production of air pollutants across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: The production of air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides and sulphur oxides, through companies' operations and business activities, has adverse effects on the climate, habitats, biodiversity, agriculture, air quality and the health of both animals and humans (GRI, 2021). Moreover, the increase in certain air pollutants can disrupt the provision of ecosystem services, for example nutrient cycling and carbon cycling, but also water supply, on which planetary and human life depends. As such, this indicator measures companies' approach to measuring and reducing harmful air pollutants across the value chain, including beyond national and international regulations. </p><p> </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric companies should publicly disclose an Air Quality Management Systems/Index. This includes detailed information about measures (such as techniques, processes, tools) the company has in place to measure, manage, and reduce air pollutants.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_Air_pollutants.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_EB_Air_Pollutants_Management_and_Monitoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114528,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B13.EC Air Pollutants Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_EC_Air_Pollutants_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B13.EC Air Pollutants Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report regularly on air quality parameters of air emissions identified in relevant regulations as harmful air pollutants by international bodies for its industry?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces the production of air pollutants across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: The production of air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides and sulphur oxides, through companies' operations and business activities, has adverse effects on the climate, habitats, biodiversity, agriculture, air quality and the health of both animals and humans (GRI, 2021). Moreover, the increase in certain air pollutants can disrupt the provision of ecosystem services, for example nutrient cycling and carbon cycling, but also water supply, on which planetary and human life depends. As such, this indicator measures companies' approach to measuring and reducing harmful air pollutants across the value chain, including beyond national and international regulations. </p><p> </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric reporting data on non-GHG emissions. the company should state that these have been identified as the most material to the company through a materiality process due to its industry and geographical locations. Air pollutants that companies should be reporting on include nitrous oxides (NOx), sulphur oxides (SOx), persistent organic pollutants (POP), volatile organic compounds (VOC), hazardous air pollutants (HAP), particular matter (PM) and other standard categories of air pollutants.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_Air_pollutants.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_EC_Air_Pollutants_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114540,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B13.ED Air Pollutants Time-Bound Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_ED_Air_Pollutants_Time_Bound_Targets.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B13.ED Air Pollutants Time-Bound Targets",
      "question": "Does the company have time-bound targets to reduce air pollutants across the most material parts of its value chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces the production of air pollutants across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: The production of air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides and sulphur oxides, through companies' operations and business activities, has adverse effects on the climate, habitats, biodiversity, agriculture, air quality and the health of both animals and humans (GRI, 2021). Moreover, the increase in certain air pollutants can disrupt the provision of ecosystem services, for example nutrient cycling and carbon cycling, but also water supply, on which planetary and human life depends. As such, this indicator measures companies' approach to measuring and reducing harmful air pollutants across the value chain, including beyond national and international regulations. </p><p> </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company has time-bound targets to reduce non-GHG emissions.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_Air_pollutants.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_ED_Air_Pollutants_Time_Bound_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114552,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B13.EE Air pollutants Target reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_EE_Air_pollutants_Target_reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B13.EE Air pollutants Target reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report regularly against its air pollutant targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces the production of air pollutants across the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: The production of air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides and sulphur oxides, through companies' operations and business activities, has adverse effects on the climate, habitats, biodiversity, agriculture, air quality and the health of both animals and humans (GRI, 2021). Moreover, the increase in certain air pollutants can disrupt the provision of ecosystem services, for example nutrient cycling and carbon cycling, but also water supply, on which planetary and human life depends. As such, this indicator measures companies' approach to measuring and reducing harmful air pollutants across the value chain, including beyond national and international regulations. </p><p> </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric company must meet element D for this to be met. Company has a target to reduce non-GHG emissions (element D) and reports its progress, which includes demonstrating a reduction against the previous year.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_Air_pollutants.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_EE_Air_pollutants_Target_reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114564,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B14.EA Scope 1 and 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B14_EA_Scope_1_and_2_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Reductions.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B14.EA Scope 1 and 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions",
      "question": "Does the company disclose quantitative reductions for its scope 1 and 2 emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces its scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in line with a 1.5- degree trajectory. </p><p>Rationale: Biodiversity and climate change are heavily interlinked (CBD, 2009), with conversion and degradation of ecosystems leading to increases in GHG emissions. Subsequently, the effects of climate change are driving further biodiversity loss through increased risk of extinctions and extreme weather events. As such, this indicator focuses on companies' emissions reductions in line with a 1.5- degree trajectory as recommended by the Paris Agreement. Furthermore, the indicator is aligned with the SBTi's interim target to reduce value chain GHG emissions by 50% by 2030, in accordance with sectoral ambitions, and by 90-95% by 2050, in accordance with sectoral ambitions by 2030. </p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company's combined scope 1 and 2 emissions total must decrease against the previous year.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B14_Scope_1_and_2_greenhouse_gas_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B14_EA_Scope_1_and_2_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Reductions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114576,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B14.EB Scope 1 and 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B14_EB_Scope_1_and_2_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Targets.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B14.EB Scope 1 and 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets",
      "question": "Does the company have targets to reduce its scope 1 and 2 emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces its scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in line with a 1.5- degree trajectory. </p><p>Rationale: Biodiversity and climate change are heavily interlinked (CBD, 2009), with conversion and degradation of ecosystems leading to increases in GHG emissions. Subsequently, the effects of climate change are driving further biodiversity loss through increased risk of extinctions and extreme weather events. As such, this indicator focuses on companies' emissions reductions in line with a 1.5- degree trajectory as recommended by the Paris Agreement. Furthermore, the indicator is aligned with the SBTi's interim target to reduce value chain GHG emissions by 50% by 2030, in accordance with sectoral ambitions, and by 90-95% by 2050, in accordance with sectoral ambitions by 2030. </p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric company has a time-bound target to reduce its scope 1 and 2 emissions. Net-zero targets are accepted only when it is clearly specified that this target includes the company's scope 1 and 2 emissions. Emission intensity targets are accepted only if the company discloses that the reduction in emission intensity this will lead to absolute emission reductions.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B14_Scope_1_and_2_greenhouse_gas_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B14_EB_Scope_1_and_2_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114588,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B14.EC Scope 1 and 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B14_EC_Scope_1_and_2_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Targets_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B14.EC Scope 1 and 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report progress against its scope 1 and 2 emissions reduction targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces its scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in line with a 1.5- degree trajectory. </p><p>Rationale: Biodiversity and climate change are heavily interlinked (CBD, 2009), with conversion and degradation of ecosystems leading to increases in GHG emissions. Subsequently, the effects of climate change are driving further biodiversity loss through increased risk of extinctions and extreme weather events. As such, this indicator focuses on companies' emissions reductions in line with a 1.5- degree trajectory as recommended by the Paris Agreement. Furthermore, the indicator is aligned with the SBTi's interim target to reduce value chain GHG emissions by 50% by 2030, in accordance with sectoral ambitions, and by 90-95% by 2050, in accordance with sectoral ambitions by 2030. </p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric company must meet elements A and B to meet this element. Company has a target to reduce its scope 1 and 2 emissions (element b) and reports its progress, which includes demonstrating a reduction against the previous year (element a).</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B14_Scope_1_and_2_greenhouse_gas_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B14_EC_Scope_1_and_2_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Targets_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114600,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B14.ED Scope 1 and 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1.5°C Alignment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B14_ED_Scope_1_and_2_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_1_5_C_Alignment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B14.ED Scope 1 and 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1.5°C Alignment",
      "question": "Are the company's scope 1 and 2 emissions reduction targets aligned with a 1.5°C trajectory?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces its scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in line with a 1.5- degree trajectory. </p><p>Rationale: Biodiversity and climate change are heavily interlinked (CBD, 2009), with conversion and degradation of ecosystems leading to increases in GHG emissions. Subsequently, the effects of climate change are driving further biodiversity loss through increased risk of extinctions and extreme weather events. As such, this indicator focuses on companies' emissions reductions in line with a 1.5- degree trajectory as recommended by the Paris Agreement. Furthermore, the indicator is aligned with the SBTi's interim target to reduce value chain GHG emissions by 50% by 2030, in accordance with sectoral ambitions, and by 90-95% by 2050, in accordance with sectoral ambitions by 2030. </p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric company has scope 1 and 2 emission reduction targets aligned with 1.5°C trajectory, approved by the Science Based Targets initiative.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B14_Scope_1_and_2_greenhouse_gas_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B14_ED_Scope_1_and_2_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_1_5_C_Alignment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114612,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B15.EA Scope 3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_EA_Scope_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B15.EA Scope 3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose only some categories of its scope 3 emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces its scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in line with a 1.5-degree trajectory. </p><p>Rationale: Scope 3 emissions are often the largest segment of companies' GHG, with business activities leading to a change in land use or degradation of ecosystems within companies' value chains. Companies can reduce scope 3 emissions by influencing business partners across their value chains as well as through their purchases or products they sell. It is estimated that about 40% of the global GHG emissions are driven, or influenced, by companies through their purchases and the products they sell (CDP, 2018). This indicator therefore seeks to hold companies accountable for their scope 3 emissions and aligns with the SBTi's guidance on the topic (SBTi, 2021).</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company reports quantitative data for segments of the company's scope 3 emissions. Segments refers to cases where companies do not provide full disclosure of their emissions – usually this is labelled as a limited disclosure and may be restricted by location or only contain a few of the emissions categories and not the entire list that comprises of scope 3 emissions.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_Scope_3_greenhouse_gas_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_EA_Scope_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114624,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B15.EB Scope 3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_EB_Scope_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Reductions_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B15.EB Scope 3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose quantitative reductions for its scope 3 emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces its scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in line with a 1.5-degree trajectory. </p><p>Rationale: Scope 3 emissions are often the largest segment of companies' GHG, with business activities leading to a change in land use or degradation of ecosystems within companies' value chains. Companies can reduce scope 3 emissions by influencing business partners across their value chains as well as through their purchases or products they sell. It is estimated that about 40% of the global GHG emissions are driven, or influenced, by companies through their purchases and the products they sell (CDP, 2018). This indicator therefore seeks to hold companies accountable for their scope 3 emissions and aligns with the SBTi's guidance on the topic (SBTi, 2021).</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company's scope 3 emissions show a reduction against the previous year. When the company reports its scope 3 segments separately, the overall total scope 3 emissions must show a reduction.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_Scope_3_greenhouse_gas_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_EB_Scope_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Reductions_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114636,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B15.EC Scope 3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_EC_Scope_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Targets.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B15.EC Scope 3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets",
      "question": "Does the company have targets to reduce scope 3 emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces its scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in line with a 1.5-degree trajectory. </p><p>Rationale: Scope 3 emissions are often the largest segment of companies' GHG, with business activities leading to a change in land use or degradation of ecosystems within companies' value chains. Companies can reduce scope 3 emissions by influencing business partners across their value chains as well as through their purchases or products they sell. It is estimated that about 40% of the global GHG emissions are driven, or influenced, by companies through their purchases and the products they sell (CDP, 2018). This indicator therefore seeks to hold companies accountable for their scope 3 emissions and aligns with the SBTi's guidance on the topic (SBTi, 2021).</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric company has a time-bound target to reduce its scope 3 emissions. Net-zero targets are accepted only if it is clearly specified that this includes the company's scope 3 emissions. Emission intensity targets are accepted only if the company discloses that the reduction in emission intensity this will lead to absolute emission reductions.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_Scope_3_greenhouse_gas_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_EC_Scope_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114648,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B15.ED Scope 3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_ED_Scope_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Targets_reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B15.ED Scope 3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report progress against its scope 3 emissions reduction targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces its scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in line with a 1.5-degree trajectory. </p><p>Rationale: Scope 3 emissions are often the largest segment of companies' GHG, with business activities leading to a change in land use or degradation of ecosystems within companies' value chains. Companies can reduce scope 3 emissions by influencing business partners across their value chains as well as through their purchases or products they sell. It is estimated that about 40% of the global GHG emissions are driven, or influenced, by companies through their purchases and the products they sell (CDP, 2018). This indicator therefore seeks to hold companies accountable for their scope 3 emissions and aligns with the SBTi's guidance on the topic (SBTi, 2021).</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric company must meet elements b and b to meet this element. the company has a target to reduce its scope 3 emissions (element c) and reports its progress, which includes demonstrating a reduction against the previous year (element b).</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_Scope_3_greenhouse_gas_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_ED_Scope_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Targets_reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114660,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B15.EE Scope 3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1.5°C Alignment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_EE_Scope_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_1_5_C_Alignment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B15.EE Scope 3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1.5°C Alignment",
      "question": "Does the company's scope 3 emissions reduction targets are aligned with a 1.5°C trajectory?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company reduces its scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in line with a 1.5-degree trajectory. </p><p>Rationale: Scope 3 emissions are often the largest segment of companies' GHG, with business activities leading to a change in land use or degradation of ecosystems within companies' value chains. Companies can reduce scope 3 emissions by influencing business partners across their value chains as well as through their purchases or products they sell. It is estimated that about 40% of the global GHG emissions are driven, or influenced, by companies through their purchases and the products they sell (CDP, 2018). This indicator therefore seeks to hold companies accountable for their scope 3 emissions and aligns with the SBTi's guidance on the topic (SBTi, 2021).</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric company has a scope 3 emission reduction target aligned with 1.5°C trajectory, approved by the Science Based Targets initiative.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_Scope_3_greenhouse_gas_emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_EE_Scope_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_1_5_C_Alignment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114672,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B16.EA Invasive Alien Species Activity Introduction Risk",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B16_EA_Invasive_Alien_Species_Activity_Introduction_Risk.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B16.EA Invasive Alien Species Activity Introduction Risk",
      "question": "Does the company identify the activities that could lead to the introduction of IAS in its own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses how it manages the risks posed by invasive alien species (IAS) in its own operations and the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: The accidental or voluntary introduction of IAS is one of the most common threats to species as well as a very important factor in ecosystems' decline and deterioration. IAS can be defined as species introduced into a foreign environment which adversely impact local biodiversity through competition and predation, provoking the disruption of local ecosystems and ecosystem functions. The CBD's Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework requires that the introduction of IAS be managed and the rate of their introduction and establishment be lessened by at least 50% (CBD, 2021).</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company discloses it has conducted an analysis (for example, a risk assessment) to identify the company's activities that might lead to the introduction of invasive species and discloses the outcomes of the assessment.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B16_Invasive_alien_species.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B16_EA_Invasive_Alien_Species_Activity_Introduction_Risk+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114684,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B16.EB Invasive Alien Species Introduction Risk in Value Chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B16_EB_Invasive_Alien_Species_Introduction_Risk_in_Value_Chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B16.EB Invasive Alien Species Introduction Risk in Value Chain",
      "question": "Does the company identify the activities that could lead to the introduction of IAS in its value chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses how it manages the risks posed by invasive alien species (IAS) in its own operations and the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: The accidental or voluntary introduction of IAS is one of the most common threats to species as well as a very important factor in ecosystems' decline and deterioration. IAS can be defined as species introduced into a foreign environment which adversely impact local biodiversity through competition and predation, provoking the disruption of local ecosystems and ecosystem functions. The CBD's Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework requires that the introduction of IAS be managed and the rate of their introduction and establishment be lessened by at least 50% (CBD, 2021).</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company discloses it has conducted an analysis (for example, a, risk assessment) to identify the activities throughout its value chain that could lead to the introduction of invasives species and discloses the outcomes of the assessment.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B16_Invasive_alien_species.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B16_EB_Invasive_Alien_Species_Introduction_Risk_in_Value_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114696,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B16.EC Invasive Alien Species Introduction Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B16_EC_Invasive_Alien_Species_Introduction_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B16.EC Invasive Alien Species Introduction Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose any introduction of IAS resulting from its own operations or its value chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses how it manages the risks posed by invasive alien species (IAS) in its own operations and the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: The accidental or voluntary introduction of IAS is one of the most common threats to species as well as a very important factor in ecosystems' decline and deterioration. IAS can be defined as species introduced into a foreign environment which adversely impact local biodiversity through competition and predation, provoking the disruption of local ecosystems and ecosystem functions. The CBD's Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework requires that the introduction of IAS be managed and the rate of their introduction and establishment be lessened by at least 50% (CBD, 2021).</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company discloses any introduction of invasive species due to its own activities. Mentioning invasive species that were introduced previously or by others in area where they operate is not enough.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B16_Invasive_alien_species.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B16_EC_Invasive_Alien_Species_Introduction_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114708,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B16.ED Invasive Alien Species Introduction Prevention",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B16_ED_Invasive_Alien_Species_Introduction_Prevention.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B16.ED Invasive Alien Species Introduction Prevention",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its processes to prevent the introduction of IAS or to manage IAS that have been introduced as a result of its own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses how it manages the risks posed by invasive alien species (IAS) in its own operations and the most material parts of its value chain. </p><p>Rationale: The accidental or voluntary introduction of IAS is one of the most common threats to species as well as a very important factor in ecosystems' decline and deterioration. IAS can be defined as species introduced into a foreign environment which adversely impact local biodiversity through competition and predation, provoking the disruption of local ecosystems and ecosystem functions. The CBD's Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework requires that the introduction of IAS be managed and the rate of their introduction and establishment be lessened by at least 50% (CBD, 2021).</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company has a process to either prevent introduction of invasive species (for example, pathway management) or to manage already introduced IAS (reproduction control, monitoring), or both in either element of the operations (own operations or value chain, or both).</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B16_Invasive_alien_species.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B16_ED_Invasive_Alien_Species_Introduction_Prevention+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114720,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C01.EA Right to a Safe, Clean, Healthy, and Sustainable Environment Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_EA_Right_to_a_Safe_Clean_Healthy_and_Sustainable_Environment_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C01.EA Right to a Safe, Clean, Healthy, and Sustainable Environment Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company commit to respecting the right to a safe, clean, healthy, and sustainable environment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company respects the right to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment. </p><p>Rationale: The United Nations recently recognised access to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment as a universal human right (UN, 2021b). Business activities and infrastructure projects may expose local communities to increased environmental risks and adverse impacts, for example related to toxic materials or spread of diseases (IFC, 2012). At the same time, human rights defenders across the globe remain highly vulnerable and face violent and sometimes fatal assaults – in conjunction with increasing intimidation, harassment, stigmatisation and criminalisation. There is growing concern about the role of business in causing, contributing or being directly linked to attacks against human rights defenders, or in failing to take action against such attacks (UN, UNEP, 2021).</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the indicator requires a reference to communities or other users in their surroundings, such as neighbours, neighbouring communities, local communities, affected communities. The commitment may reference aspects clean air, non-toxic environment, safe and clean environment as well. Health and Safety protocols are not accepted, as they generally target employees and not local communities. The indicator only accepts commitments in policy documents and not sustainability reports. However, a case-by-case review was done for this iteration.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_Right_to_a_safe_clean_healthy_and_sustainable_environment.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_EA_Right_to_a_Safe_Clean_Healthy_and_Sustainable_Environment_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114732,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C01.EB Impacts Identification Process includes Focus on Health of Local Communities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_EB_Impacts_Identification_Process_includes_Focus_on_Health_of_Local_Communities.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C01.EB Impacts Identification Process includes Focus on Health of Local Communities",
      "question": "Does the company demonstrate that its human rights risks and impacts identification process includes a focus on the health of local communities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company respects the right to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment. </p><p>Rationale: The United Nations recently recognised access to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment as a universal human right (UN, 2021b). Business activities and infrastructure projects may expose local communities to increased environmental risks and adverse impacts, for example related to toxic materials or spread of diseases (IFC, 2012). At the same time, human rights defenders across the globe remain highly vulnerable and face violent and sometimes fatal assaults – in conjunction with increasing intimidation, harassment, stigmatisation and criminalisation. There is growing concern about the role of business in causing, contributing or being directly linked to attacks against human rights defenders, or in failing to take action against such attacks (UN, UNEP, 2021).</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company identifies human health as a salient risk. A reference to local communities and/or other users in the surroundings is needed. In the current iteration, the indicator does not prescribe which salient issues are relevant, as this can vary by company. </p><p>Keywords: healthy environment, clean air, non-toxic environment, human health risks, local communities, affected local communities</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_Right_to_a_safe_clean_healthy_and_sustainable_environment.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_EB_Impacts_Identification_Process_includes_Focus_on_Health_of_Local_Communities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114744,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C01.EC Tracking Negative Impact on Local Communities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_EC_Tracking_Negative_Impact_on_Local_Communities.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C01.EC Tracking Negative Impact on Local Communities",
      "question": "Does the company provide evidence of tracking its actual or potential negative impacts on the health of local communities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company respects the right to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment. </p><p>Rationale: The United Nations recently recognised access to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment as a universal human right (UN, 2021b). Business activities and infrastructure projects may expose local communities to increased environmental risks and adverse impacts, for example related to toxic materials or spread of diseases (IFC, 2012). At the same time, human rights defenders across the globe remain highly vulnerable and face violent and sometimes fatal assaults – in conjunction with increasing intimidation, harassment, stigmatisation and criminalisation. There is growing concern about the role of business in causing, contributing or being directly linked to attacks against human rights defenders, or in failing to take action against such attacks (UN, UNEP, 2021).</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric this should include both scale (the outcome of the impact; frequency) and scope (the number of individuals who are or could be affected; frequency; geographies). ‘Tracking impacts' here is not to be confused with ‘tracking responses', which is not eligible. The indicator accepts “assessing” or “assessment” of impact in the health of local communities.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_Right_to_a_safe_clean_healthy_and_sustainable_environment.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_EC_Tracking_Negative_Impact_on_Local_Communities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114756,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C01.ED Preventing/Mitigating/Remediating Negative Impact on Local Communities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_ED_Preventing_Mitigating_Remediating_Negative_Impact_on_Local_Communities.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C01.ED Preventing/Mitigating/Remediating Negative Impact on Local Communities",
      "question": "Does the company provide evidence of how it prevents, mitigates or remediates its actual and potential negative impacts on the health of local communities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company respects the right to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment. </p><p>Rationale: The United Nations recently recognised access to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment as a universal human right (UN, 2021b). Business activities and infrastructure projects may expose local communities to increased environmental risks and adverse impacts, for example related to toxic materials or spread of diseases (IFC, 2012). At the same time, human rights defenders across the globe remain highly vulnerable and face violent and sometimes fatal assaults – in conjunction with increasing intimidation, harassment, stigmatisation and criminalisation. There is growing concern about the role of business in causing, contributing or being directly linked to attacks against human rights defenders, or in failing to take action against such attacks (UN, UNEP, 2021).</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company needs to show concrete actions taken to address actual/potential impacts. It can be an example of the specific conclusions reached or a global system to take action to prevent, mitigate or remediate its salient rights issue. the company would automatically achieve a score for C9 (CSI 5) for meeting this element, but it could meet C9 (CSI 5) without providing any specific information regarding the health of local communities.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_Right_to_a_safe_clean_healthy_and_sustainable_environment.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_ED_Preventing_Mitigating_Remediating_Negative_Impact_on_Local_Communities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114768,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C01.EE Commitment to Safety of Rights Defenders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_EE_Commitment_to_Safety_of_Rights_Defenders.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C01.EE Commitment to Safety of Rights Defenders",
      "question": "Does the company have a commitment to zero tolerance for acts of violence, threats, intimidation or judicial harassment committed against land and environmental rights defenders?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company respects the right to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment. </p><p>Rationale: The United Nations recently recognised access to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment as a universal human right (UN, 2021b). Business activities and infrastructure projects may expose local communities to increased environmental risks and adverse impacts, for example related to toxic materials or spread of diseases (IFC, 2012). At the same time, human rights defenders across the globe remain highly vulnerable and face violent and sometimes fatal assaults – in conjunction with increasing intimidation, harassment, stigmatisation and criminalisation. There is growing concern about the role of business in causing, contributing or being directly linked to attacks against human rights defenders, or in failing to take action against such attacks (UN, UNEP, 2021).</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric If the companies' commitment refers to ‘human rights defenders' but makes no reference to land/environment, it can still be considered met. the company should reference all types of attacks identified (acts of violence, threats, intimidation or judicial harassment), however, this has been checked on a case-by-case basis depending on the wording used. </p><p>Keywords: land and environmental rights defenders, human rights defenders, land defenders, environmental defenders.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_Right_to_a_safe_clean_healthy_and_sustainable_environment.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_EE_Commitment_to_Safety_of_Rights_Defenders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114779,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C02.EA Indigenous People' Rights Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C02_EA_Indigenous_People_Rights_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C02.EA Indigenous People' Rights Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company have a commitment to respect Indigenous Peoples' rights or reference the relevant part(s) of ILO Convention No. 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples or the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company respects indigenous peoples' rights and obtains affected Indigenous Peoples' free, prior and informed consent regarding whether and how to carry out projects. </p><p>Rationale: Indigenous peoples may be particularly vulnerable to the adverse impacts associated with project development, including risk of impoverishment and loss of identity, culture and natural resource-based livelihoods (IFC, 2012d). Protecting and securing Indigenous Peoples' rights has been recognised as crucial to advancing conservation, restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies (WRI, 2019).</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C02_Indigenous_people_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C02_EA_Indigenous_People_Rights_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114791,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C02.EB Indigenous People' Rights Impact Identification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C02_EB_Indigenous_People_Rights_Impact_Identification.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C02.EB Indigenous People' Rights Impact Identification",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its processes to identify and recognize the rights of Indigenous Peoples when activities in its own operations may impact their rights, and describes how it obtains Indigenous Peoples' free, prior and informed consent regarding whether and how to carry out projects?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company respects indigenous peoples' rights and obtains affected Indigenous Peoples' free, prior and informed consent regarding whether and how to carry out projects. </p><p>Rationale: Indigenous peoples may be particularly vulnerable to the adverse impacts associated with project development, including risk of impoverishment and loss of identity, culture and natural resource-based livelihoods (IFC, 2012d). Protecting and securing Indigenous Peoples' rights has been recognised as crucial to advancing conservation, restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies (WRI, 2019).</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric engagement must include carrying out assessment with Indigenous communities, not simply sharing the results with them. the company also needs evidence of a process whereby the company identifies with whom they should engage. the company must disclose their commitments in their own policies. The indicator does not accept ICMM membership because the ICMM has no monitoring mechanism to track whether members are upholding these commitments, and the ICMM does not have to report back.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C02_Indigenous_people_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C02_EB_Indigenous_People_Rights_Impact_Identification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114803,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C02.EC Business Relationships & Indigenous People' Rights Requirements",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C02_EC_Business_Relationships_Indigenous_People_Rights_Requirements.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C02.EC Business Relationships & Indigenous People' Rights Requirements",
      "question": "Does the company require its business relationships to identify and recognize affected Indigenous Peoples and to obtain their free, prior and informed consent regarding whether and how to carry out projects?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company respects indigenous peoples' rights and obtains affected Indigenous Peoples' free, prior and informed consent regarding whether and how to carry out projects. </p><p>Rationale: Indigenous peoples may be particularly vulnerable to the adverse impacts associated with project development, including risk of impoverishment and loss of identity, culture and natural resource-based livelihoods (IFC, 2012d). Protecting and securing Indigenous Peoples' rights has been recognised as crucial to advancing conservation, restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies (WRI, 2019).</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric Forest protection policies (FPP) will also be accepted if it includes clear language on requirements in regards to identifying and recognising Indigenous People and to obtain FPIC. </p><p>Keyword: Forest Protection Policy, Canopy, CanopyStyle, Pack4Good Initiative</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C02_Indigenous_people_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C02_EC_Business_Relationships_Indigenous_People_Rights_Requirements+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114815,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C02.ED Business Relationships & Indigenous People' Rights Practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C02_ED_Business_Relationships_Indigenous_People_Rights_Practices.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C02.ED Business Relationships & Indigenous People' Rights Practices",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it works with its business relationships to improve its practices in respecting the rights of Indigenous Peoples?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company respects indigenous peoples' rights and obtains affected Indigenous Peoples' free, prior and informed consent regarding whether and how to carry out projects. </p><p>Rationale: Indigenous peoples may be particularly vulnerable to the adverse impacts associated with project development, including risk of impoverishment and loss of identity, culture and natural resource-based livelihoods (IFC, 2012d). Protecting and securing Indigenous Peoples' rights has been recognised as crucial to advancing conservation, restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies (WRI, 2019).</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company should indicate how it is building the capacity of the supplier to improve their practices in respecting the rights of Indigenous Peoples. This can be, for example, through training, tools, resources, or awareness programmes.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C02_Indigenous_people_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C02_ED_Business_Relationships_Indigenous_People_Rights_Practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114827,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C03.EA Land Rights Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C03_EA_Land_Rights_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C03.EA Land Rights Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company commit to respect ownership and use of land and natural resources and related legitimate tenure rights, as set out in the relevant part(s) of the CFS Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (VGGT), or the IFC Performance Standards?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company respects the rights of legitimate tenure holders when acquiring, leasing or using land, paying particular attention to vulnerable tenure rights holders. </p><p>Rationale: When companies seek to acquire or lease land for their business activities, this can lead to relocation and loss of shelter or livelihoods for communities or individual households (IFC, 2012b). In countries where national governance and land administration are weak, local and indigenous communities are more exposed to rights violations and displacement (WRI, 2017).</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric where companies do not explicitly mention the VGGT, examples can include: </p><p>• Conducting due diligence around land rights during new business ventures. </p><p>• Stating that the company actively ensures that it does not infringe upon the existing legitimate land and forest tenure rights of communities present in the area during negotiations. </p><p>• Conducting FPIC </p><p>This is not the same as a commitment to Indigenous land rights. Rather, this indicator is relevant for every population or community, including urban communities. It is not sufficient to follow local applicable laws around land rights, as many countries have insufficient systems in place to secure land tenure rights.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C03_Land_Rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C03_EA_Land_Rights_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114838,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C03.EB Land Acquisition Engagement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C03_EB_Land_Acquisition_Engagement.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C03.EB Land Acquisition Engagement",
      "question": "Does the company, when acquiring, leasing land or making other arrangements to use or restrict the use or access to land or natural resources, discloses its processes to (i) identify legitimate tenure rights holders, including through engagement with affected communities in the process, paying particular attention to vulnerable or marginalized tenure rights holders, and (ii) negotiate with them to provide adequate compensation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company respects the rights of legitimate tenure holders when acquiring, leasing or using land, paying particular attention to vulnerable tenure rights holders. </p><p>Rationale: When companies seek to acquire or lease land for their business activities, this can lead to relocation and loss of shelter or livelihoods for communities or individual households (IFC, 2012b). In countries where national governance and land administration are weak, local and indigenous communities are more exposed to rights violations and displacement (WRI, 2017).</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company must describe how it identifies legitimate tenure rights holders. This can be through engagement with relevant local stakeholders or through processes regulated by international standards. It has to provide a negotiation process/FPIC process/engagement protocol to guarantee adequate compensation. This indicator looks for evidence of current and recent cases. If the company has not engaged in any land transactions in the past two years, it should describe its approach to identifying and negotiating legitimate tenure rights holders in general.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C03_Land_Rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C03_EB_Land_Acquisition_Engagement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114849,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C03.EC Business Relationships Requirements of Land Rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C03_EC_Business_Relationships_Requirements_of_Land_Rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C03.EC Business Relationships Requirements of Land Rights",
      "question": "Does the company require its business relationships to have a process to identify legitimate tenure rights holders when acquiring, leasing or making other arrangements to use land, paying particular attention to vulnerable or marginalized tenure rights holders, and negotiating with them to provide adequate compensation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company respects the rights of legitimate tenure holders when acquiring, leasing or using land, paying particular attention to vulnerable tenure rights holders. </p><p>Rationale: When companies seek to acquire or lease land for their business activities, this can lead to relocation and loss of shelter or livelihoods for communities or individual households (IFC, 2012b). In countries where national governance and land administration are weak, local and indigenous communities are more exposed to rights violations and displacement (WRI, 2017).</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric this information must be codified in a policy document, such as supplier code of conduct or similar.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C03_Land_Rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C03_EC_Business_Relationships_Requirements_of_Land_Rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114860,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C03.ED Business Relationships Land Rights Practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C03_ED_Business_Relationships_Land_Rights_Practices.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C03.ED Business Relationships Land Rights Practices",
      "question": "Does the company work with its business relationships to improve its practices on land use and acquisition?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company respects the rights of legitimate tenure holders when acquiring, leasing or using land, paying particular attention to vulnerable tenure rights holders. </p><p>Rationale: When companies seek to acquire or lease land for their business activities, this can lead to relocation and loss of shelter or livelihoods for communities or individual households (IFC, 2012b). In countries where national governance and land administration are weak, local and indigenous communities are more exposed to rights violations and displacement (WRI, 2017).</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company should indicate how it is building the capacity of the supplier to improve their practices on land use and acquisition. This could involve training, tools, resources developed for suppliers, and awareness programmes.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C03_Land_Rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C03_ED_Business_Relationships_Land_Rights_Practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114871,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C04.EA Respecting the Right to Water",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C04_EA_Respecting_the_Right_to_Water.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C04.EA Respecting the Right to Water",
      "question": "Does the company have a commitment to respect the right to water?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company respects the right to water and does not negatively affect access to safe water. </p><p>Rationale: Water scarcity affects more than 40% of people around the world – an alarming figure that is projected to increase due to climate change (UN, 2021). Water challenges include not only water scarcity but also pollution, flooding and access to drinking water and sanitation services. Companies are expected to adopt water stewardship practices that ensure water use and treatment are socially equitable and environmentally sustainable (UNGC, 2007).</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the commitment must be in a public policy document. The commitment must refer to local communities or neighbouring communities. The indicator also accepts the CEO Water Mandate. </p><p>Keywords: Safe water/access to water/right to water/water quality/water provision</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C04_Water_and_sanitation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C04_EA_Respecting_the_Right_to_Water+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114883,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C04.EB Preventing Risks to Right to Water and Sanitation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C04_EB_Preventing_Risks_to_Right_to_Water_and_Sanitation.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C04.EB Preventing Risks to Right to Water and Sanitation",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its processes to implement preventive and corrective action plans for identified specific risks to the right to water and sanitation in its own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company respects the right to water and does not negatively affect access to safe water. </p><p>Rationale: Water scarcity affects more than 40% of people around the world – an alarming figure that is projected to increase due to climate change (UN, 2021). Water challenges include not only water scarcity but also pollution, flooding and access to drinking water and sanitation services. Companies are expected to adopt water stewardship practices that ensure water use and treatment are socially equitable and environmentally sustainable (UNGC, 2007).</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric communities or other users should be a central part of what is being addressed with corrective action plan.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C04_Water_and_sanitation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C04_EB_Preventing_Risks_to_Right_to_Water_and_Sanitation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114895,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C04.EC Requiring Business Partners to Respect Right to Water and Sanitation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C04_EC_Requiring_Business_Partners_to_Respect_Right_to_Water_and_Sanitation.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C04.EC Requiring Business Partners to Respect Right to Water and Sanitation",
      "question": "Does the company require access to water and sanitation, including refraining from negatively affecting access to safe water, to be included in contractual arrangements with its business relationships?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company respects the right to water and does not negatively affect access to safe water. </p><p>Rationale: Water scarcity affects more than 40% of people around the world – an alarming figure that is projected to increase due to climate change (UN, 2021). Water challenges include not only water scarcity but also pollution, flooding and access to drinking water and sanitation services. Companies are expected to adopt water stewardship practices that ensure water use and treatment are socially equitable and environmentally sustainable (UNGC, 2007).</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric this information must be codified in a policy document, such as supplier code of conduct or similar.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6: Clean Water and Sanitation",
        "UN SDGs+SDG6.5 Implement integrated water-resources management at all levels, including transboundary cooperation.",
        "UN SDGs+SDG17 - Partnerships for the Goals",
        "UN SDGs+SDG17.17 Promote effective public, private, and civil society partnerships to support sustainable development."
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C04_Water_and_sanitation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C04_EC_Requiring_Business_Partners_to_Respect_Right_to_Water_and_Sanitation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114907,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C04.ED Improving Business Partner Practices on Right to Water and Sanitation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C04_ED_Improving_Business_Partner_Practices_on_Right_to_Water_and_Sanitation.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C04.ED Improving Business Partner Practices on Right to Water and Sanitation",
      "question": "Does the company work with its business relationships to improve its practices on access to water and sanitation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company respects the right to water and does not negatively affect access to safe water. </p><p>Rationale: Water scarcity affects more than 40% of people around the world – an alarming figure that is projected to increase due to climate change (UN, 2021). Water challenges include not only water scarcity but also pollution, flooding and access to drinking water and sanitation services. Companies are expected to adopt water stewardship practices that ensure water use and treatment are socially equitable and environmentally sustainable (UNGC, 2007).</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p>For this metric the company should indicate how it is working with its business relationships, for example, working with suppliers to build their capacity and improve their practices on access to water and sanitation. This could include training, tools and resources developed for suppliers, or awareness programmes. Access to water or local communities must be explicitly referenced, not just water usage or environmental targets in general.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C04_Water_and_sanitation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C04_ED_Improving_Business_Partner_Practices_on_Right_to_Water_and_Sanitation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114919,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Commitment to Respect Human Rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_Respect_Human_Rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Commitment to Respect Human Rights",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect human rights?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]]</p>\r\n<p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p>\r\n<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company publicly commits to respecting all internationally recognised human rights across its activities.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Commitment to Respect Human Rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_Respect_Human_Rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C05_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_Respect_Human_Rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114931,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.2.A Commitment to Respect the Human Rights of Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_2_A_Commitment_to_Respect_the_Human_Rights_of_Workers.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.2.A Commitment to Respect the Human Rights of Workers",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respecting the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]]</p>\r\n<p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p>\r\n<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company publicly commits to respecting the principles concerning fundamental rights at work in the eight ILO core conventions as set out in the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. It also has a publicly available statement of policy committing it to respect the human rights of workers in its business relationships.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.2.A Commitment to Respect the Human Rights of Workers+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_2_A_Commitment_to_Respect_the_Human_Rights_of_Workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C06_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_2_A_Commitment_to_Respect_the_Human_Rights_of_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114943,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.2.B Business Relationship Commitment to Respect the Human Rights of Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_2_B_Business_Relationship_Commitment_to_Respect_the_Human_Rights_of_Workers.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.2.B Business Relationship Commitment to Respect the Human Rights of Workers",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available statement of policy that expects its business relationships to commit to respecting the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company publicly commits to respecting the principles concerning fundamental rights at work in the eight ILO core conventions as set out in the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. It also has a publicly available statement of policy committing it to respect the human rights of workers in its business relationships.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.2.B Business Relationship Commitment to Respect the Human Rights of Workers+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_2_B_Business_Relationship_Commitment_to_Respect_the_Human_Rights_of_Workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C06_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_2_B_Business_Relationship_Commitment_to_Respect_the_Human_Rights_of_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114955,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.3.A Identifying Human Rights Risk and Impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_3_A_Identifying_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.3.A Identifying Human Rights Risk and Impacts",
      "question": "Does the company describe the process(es) to identify its human rights risks and impacts in specific locations or activities covering its own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company proactively identifies its human rights risks and impacts.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.3.A Identifying Human Rights Risk and Impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_3_A_Identifying_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C07_Identifying_human_rights_risk_and_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_3_A_Identifying_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114967,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.3.B Identifying Business Partner Human Rights Risk and Impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_3_B_Identifying_Business_Partner_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.3.B Identifying Business Partner Human Rights Risk and Impacts",
      "question": "Does the company describe the process(es) to identify its human rights risks and impacts in specific locations or activities through relevant business relationships, including its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]]</p>\r\n<p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p>\r\n<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company proactively identifies its human rights risks and impacts.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">2026 Methodology Update</span></p>\r\n<p>Makes explicit in the question to include its supply chain as part of the business relationships.</p>\r\n<hr>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.3.B Identifying Business Partner Human Rights Risk and Impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_3_B_Identifying_Business_Partner_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C07_Identifying_human_rights_risk_and_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_3_B_Identifying_Business_Partner_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114979,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.4.A Assessing Human Rights Risks and Impacts Processes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_4_A_Assessing_Human_Rights_Risks_and_Impacts_Processes.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.4.A Assessing Human Rights Risks and Impacts Processes",
      "question": "Does the company describe its process(es) for assessing its human rights risks and disclose what it considers to be its salient human rights issues? This description includes how relevant factors are taken into account, such as geographical, economic, social and other factors.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: Having identified its human rights risks and impacts, the company assesses them and then prioritises its salient human rights risks and impacts.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C08_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_4_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_4_A_Assessing_Human_Rights_Risks_and_Impacts_Processes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18114991,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.4.B Assessing Human Rights Risks and Impacts Results",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_4_B_Assessing_Human_Rights_Risks_and_Impacts_Results.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.4.B Assessing Human Rights Risks and Impacts Results",
      "question": "Does the company publicly disclose the results of its assessments, which may be aggregated across its operations and locations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: Having identified its human rights risks and impacts, the company assesses them and then prioritises its salient human rights risks and impacts.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.4.B Assessing Human Rights Risks and Impacts Results+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_4_B_Assessing_Human_Rights_Risks_and_Impacts_Results+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C08_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_4_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_4_B_Assessing_Human_Rights_Risks_and_Impacts_Results+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115003,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.5.A Integrating and Acting on Human Rights Risk and Impact Assessments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_5_A_Integrating_and_Acting_on_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impact_Assessments.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.5.A Integrating and Acting on Human Rights Risk and Impact Assessments",
      "question": "Does the company describe its global system to take action to prevent, mitigate or remediate its salient human rights issues, AND this includes a description of how its global system applies to its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company integrates the findings of its assessments of human rights risks and impacts into relevant internal functions and processes by taking appropriate actions to prevent, mitigate or remediate its salient human rights issues.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable",
        "Partially"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C09_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risk_and_impact_assessments.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_5_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risk_and_impact_assessments.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_5_A_Integrating_and_Acting_on_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impact_Assessments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115015,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.5.B Integrating and Acting on Human Rights Risk and Impact Assessments Specific Conclusions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_5_B_Integrating_and_Acting_on_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impact_Assessments_Specific_Conclusions.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.5.B Integrating and Acting on Human Rights Risk and Impact Assessments Specific Conclusions",
      "question": "Does the company provide an example of the specific conclusions reached and actions taken or to be taken on at least one of its salient human rights issues as a result of assessment processes in at least one of its activities/operations in the last three years?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company integrates the findings of its assessments of human rights risks and impacts into relevant internal functions and processes by taking appropriate actions to prevent, mitigate or remediate its salient human rights issues.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable",
        "Partially"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C09_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risk_and_impact_assessments.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_5_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risk_and_impact_assessments.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_5_B_Integrating_and_Acting_on_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impact_Assessments_Specific_Conclusions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115027,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.6.A Engaging with Affected and Potentially Affected Stakeholders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_6_A_Engaging_with_Affected_and_Potentially_Affected_Stakeholders.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.6.A Engaging with Affected and Potentially Affected Stakeholders",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the categories of stakeholders whose human rights have been or may be affected by its activities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: As part of identifying and assessing its human rights risks and impacts, the company identifies and engages with stakeholders whose human rights have been or may be affected by its activities.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.6.A Engaging with Affected and Potentially Affected Stakeholders+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_6_A_Engaging_with_Affected_and_Potentially_Affected_Stakeholders+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C10_Engaging_with_affected_and_potentially_affected_stakeholders.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_6_A_Engaging_with_Affected_and_Potentially_Affected_Stakeholders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115039,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.6.B Engaging with Affected and Potentially Affected Stakeholders Examples",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_6_B_Engaging_with_Affected_and_Potentially_Affected_Stakeholders_Examples.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.6.B Engaging with Affected and Potentially Affected Stakeholders Examples",
      "question": "Does the company provide at least two examples of its engagement with stakeholders whose human rights have been or may be affected by its activities (or their legitimate representatives or multi-stakeholder initiatives) in the last two years?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: As part of identifying and assessing its human rights risks and impacts, the company identifies and engages with stakeholders whose human rights have been or may be affected by its activities.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.6.B Engaging with Affected and Potentially Affected Stakeholders Examples+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_6_B_Engaging_with_Affected_and_Potentially_Affected_Stakeholders_Examples+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C10_Engaging_with_affected_and_potentially_affected_stakeholders.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_6_B_Engaging_with_Affected_and_Potentially_Affected_Stakeholders_Examples+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115051,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.7.A Grievance Mechanisms for Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_7_A_Grievance_Mechanisms_for_Workers.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.7.A Grievance Mechanisms for Workers",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it has one or more channel(s)/mechanism(s), or participates in a third-party or shared mechanism, accessible to all workers to raise complaints or concerns related to the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]]</p>\r\n<p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p>\r\n<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company has one or more channels/mechanisms (its own, third party or shared) through which workers can raise complaints or concerns, including in relation to human rights issues.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Partially"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.7.A Grievance Mechanisms for Workers+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_7_A_Grievance_Mechanisms_for_Workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C11_Grievance_mechanisms_for_workers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_7_A_Grievance_Mechanisms_for_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115063,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.8.A Grievance Mechanisms for External Individuals and communities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_8_A_Grievance_Mechanisms_for_External_Individuals_and_communities.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.8.A Grievance Mechanisms for External Individuals and communities",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it has one or more channel(s)/mechanism(s), or participates in a shared mechanism, accessible to all external individuals and communities who may be adversely impacted by the company (or individuals or organizations acting on their behalf or who are otherwise in a position to be aware of adverse impacts), to raise complaints or concerns?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company has one or more channels/mechanisms (its own, third party or shared) through which individuals and communities who may be adversely impacted by the company can raise complaints or concerns, including in relation to human rights issues.</p><p></p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.8.A Grievance Mechanisms for External Individuals and communities+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_8_A_Grievance_Mechanisms_for_External_Individuals_and_communities+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C12_Grievance_Mechanisms_for_External_Individuals_and_communities.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_8_A_Grievance_Mechanisms_for_External_Individuals_and_communities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115075,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.9.A Health and Safety Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_A_Health_and_Safety_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.9.A Health and Safety Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect the health and safety of workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company publicly commits to respecting the health and safety of workers and discloses relevant data. It also places health and safety expectations on and monitors the performance of its business relationships.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C13_Health_and_safety_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_Health_and_safety_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_A_Health_and_Safety_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115087,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.9.B Health and Safety Quantitative Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_B_Health_and_Safety_Quantitative_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.9.B Health and Safety Quantitative Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose quantitative information on health and safety for its workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company publicly commits to respecting the health and safety of workers and discloses relevant data. It also places health and safety expectations on and monitors the performance of its business relationships.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.9.B Health and Safety Quantitative Disclosure+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_B_Health_and_Safety_Quantitative_Disclosure+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C13_Health_and_safety_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_Health_and_safety_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_B_Health_and_Safety_Quantitative_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115099,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.9.C Health and Safety Business Relationship Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_C_Health_and_Safety_Business_Relationship_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.9.C Health and Safety Business Relationship Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available statement of policy that expects its business relationships to commit to respecting the health and safety of their workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company publicly commits to respecting the health and safety of workers and discloses relevant data. It also places health and safety expectations on and monitors the performance of its business relationships.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C13_Health_and_safety_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_Health_and_safety_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_C_Health_and_Safety_Business_Relationship_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115111,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.9.D Health and Safety Business Relationship Monitoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_D_Health_and_Safety_Business_Relationship_Monitoring.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.9.D Health and Safety Business Relationship Monitoring",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how it monitors the health and safety performance of its business relationships?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company publicly commits to respecting the health and safety of workers and discloses relevant data. It also places health and safety expectations on and monitors the performance of its business relationships.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.9.D Health and Safety Business Relationship Monitoring+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_D_Health_and_Safety_Business_Relationship_Monitoring+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C13_Health_and_safety_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_Health_and_safety_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_D_Health_and_Safety_Business_Relationship_Monitoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115123,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.10.A Living Wage Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_A_Living_Wage_Targets.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.10.A Living Wage Targets",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a time-bound target for paying all workers a living wage or that it has achieved paying all workers a living wage?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company is committed to paying its workers a living wage and supports the payment of a living wage by its business relationships.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.10.A Living Wage Targets+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_A_Living_Wage_Targets+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C14_Living_wage_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_Living_wage_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_A_Living_Wage_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115134,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.10.B Living Wage Determination",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_B_Living_Wage_Determination.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.10.B Living Wage Determination",
      "question": "Does the Company describe how it determines a living wage for the regions where it operates?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company is committed to paying its workers a living wage and supports the payment of a living wage by its business relationships.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.10.B Living Wage Determination+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_B_Living_Wage_Determination+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C14_Living_wage_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_Living_wage_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_B_Living_Wage_Determination+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115145,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.10.C Living Wage Business Relationship Support",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_C_Living_Wage_Business_Relationship_Support.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.10.C Living Wage Business Relationship Support",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it works to support the payment of a living wage by its business relationships?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company is committed to paying its workers a living wage and supports the payment of a living wage by its business relationships.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C14_Living_wage_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_Living_wage_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_C_Living_Wage_Business_Relationship_Support+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115156,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.11.A Fair Working Hours Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_11_A_Fair_Working_Hours_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.11.A Fair Working Hours Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company publicly state that workers shall not be required to work more than 48 hours in a regular work week or 60 hours including overtime?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company does not require workers to work more than the regular and overtime hours and places equivalent expectations on its business relationships. </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C15_Working_hours_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_11_Working_hours_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_11_A_Fair_Working_Hours_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115168,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.11.B Commitment to Fair Overtime",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_11_B_Commitment_to_Fair_Overtime.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.11.B Commitment to Fair Overtime",
      "question": "Does the company publicly state that all overtime work must be consensual and be paid at a premium rate?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company does not require workers to work more than the regular and overtime hours and places equivalent expectations on its business relationships. </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.11.B Commitment to Fair Overtime+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_11_B_Commitment_to_Fair_Overtime+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C15_Working_hours_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_11_Working_hours_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_11_B_Commitment_to_Fair_Overtime+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115180,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.11.C Fair Working Hours Commitment in Business Relationship Employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_11_C_Fair_Working_Hours_Commitment_in_Business_Relationship_Employees.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.11.C Fair Working Hours Commitment in Business Relationship Employees",
      "question": "Does the company have a public expectation that its business relationships shall not require workers to work more than 48 hours in a regular work week or 60 hours including overtime?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company does not require workers to work more than the regular and overtime hours and places equivalent expectations on its business relationships. </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C15_Working_hours_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_11_Working_hours_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_11_C_Fair_Working_Hours_Commitment_in_Business_Relationship_Employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115192,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.12.A Collective Bargaining",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_12_A_Collective_Bargaining.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.12.A Collective Bargaining",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the proportion of its total direct operations workforce covered by collective bargaining agreements?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses information about collective bargaining agreements covering its workforce and its approach to supporting the practices of its business relationships in relation to freedom of association and collective bargaining.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.12.A Collective Bargaining+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4100,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_12_A_Collective_Bargaining+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C16_Collective_bargaining_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_12_A_Collective_Bargaining+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115203,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.12.B Collective Bargaining in Business Relationships",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_12_B_Collective_Bargaining_in_Business_Relationships.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.12.B Collective Bargaining in Business Relationships",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it works to support the practices of its business relationships in relation to freedom of association and collective bargaining?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses information about collective bargaining agreements covering its workforce and its approach to supporting the practices of its business relationships in relation to freedom of association and collective bargaining.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.12.B Collective Bargaining in Business Relationships+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_12_B_Collective_Bargaining_in_Business_Relationships+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C16_Collective_bargaining_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_12_B_Collective_Bargaining_in_Business_Relationships+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115214,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.13.A Workforce Age Diversity Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_A_Workforce_Age_Diversity_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.13.A Workforce Age Diversity Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by age group?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses the percentage of employees for each employee category by at least four indicators of diversity.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.13.A Workforce Age Diversity Disclosure+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_A_Workforce_Age_Diversity_Disclosure+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C17_Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_A_Workforce_Age_Diversity_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115226,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.13.B Workforce Gender Diversity Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_B_Workforce_Gender_Diversity_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.13.B Workforce Gender Diversity Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by gender?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses the percentage of employees for each employee category by at least four indicators of diversity.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production"
      ],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.13.B Workforce Gender Diversity Disclosure+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_B_Workforce_Gender_Diversity_Disclosure+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C17_Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_B_Workforce_Gender_Diversity_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115238,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.13.C Workforce Race Diversity Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_C_Workforce_Race_Diversity_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.13.C Workforce Race Diversity Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by race or ethnicity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses the percentage of employees for each employee category by at least four indicators of diversity.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C17_Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_C_Workforce_Race_Diversity_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115250,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.13.D Workforce Other Diversity Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_D_Workforce_Other_Diversity_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.13.D Workforce Other Diversity Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by one or more additional indicators of diversity (e.g. disability, sexual identity and marital and family status, etc.)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company discloses the percentage of employees for each employee category by at least four indicators of diversity.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+LGBT Inclusion",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Disability Inclusion"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C17_Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_D_Workforce_Other_Diversity_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115262,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.14.A Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_A_Gender_Equality_and_Women_s_Empowerment_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.14.A Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company have a public commitment to gender equality and women's empowerment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company publicly commits to gender equality and women's empowerment and discloses quantitative information on gender equality and women's empowerment.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production"
      ],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.14.A Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment Commitment+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4101,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2294,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_A_Gender_Equality_and_Women_s_Empowerment_Commitment+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C18_Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_A_Gender_Equality_and_Women_s_Empowerment_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115274,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.14.B Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_B_Gender_Equality_and_Women_s_Empowerment_Targets.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.14.B Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment Targets",
      "question": "Does the company disclose one or more time-bound targets on gender equality and women's empowerment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company publicly commits to gender equality and women's empowerment and discloses quantitative information on gender equality and women's empowerment.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.14.B Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment Targets+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4101,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2294,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_B_Gender_Equality_and_Women_s_Empowerment_Targets+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C18_Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_B_Gender_Equality_and_Women_s_Empowerment_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115286,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.14.C At least 30% Women on Highest Governance Body",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_C_At_least_30_Women_on_Highest_Governance_Body.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.14.C At least 30% Women on Highest Governance Body",
      "question": "Does the company have at least 30% women on the highest governance body?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company publicly commits to gender equality and women's empowerment and discloses quantitative information on gender equality and women's empowerment.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C18_Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_C_At_least_30_Women_on_Highest_Governance_Body+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115298,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.14.D Gender Pay Ratio Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_D_Gender_Pay_Ratio_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.14.D Gender Pay Ratio Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the ratio of the basic salary and remuneration of women to men in its total direct operations workforce for each employee category, by significant locations of operation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company publicly commits to gender equality and women's empowerment and discloses quantitative information on gender equality and women's empowerment.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "UN SDGs",
        "UN SDGs+SDG5 - Gender Equality",
        "UN SDGs+SDG8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth",
        "UN SDGs+SDG12: Responsible Consumption and Production"
      ],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.14.D Gender Pay Ratio Disclosure+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_D_Gender_Pay_Ratio_Disclosure+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C18_Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_D_Gender_Pay_Ratio_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115310,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.15.A Personal Data Protection Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_15_A_Personal_Data_Protection_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.15.A Personal Data Protection Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company have a public commitment to protecting personal data?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company publicly commits to protecting personal data and has a global approach to data privacy. </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.15.A Personal Data Protection Commitment+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_15_A_Personal_Data_Protection_Commitment+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C19_Personal_data_protection_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_15_A_Personal_Data_Protection_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115321,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.15.B Personal Data Protection Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_15_B_Personal_Data_Protection_Policy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.15.B Personal Data Protection Policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a global publicly available privacy statement in relation to the collection, sharing and access to personal data?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company publicly commits to protecting personal data and has a global approach to data privacy. </p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.15.B Personal Data Protection Policy+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_15_B_Personal_Data_Protection_Policy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C19_Personal_data_protection_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_15_B_Personal_Data_Protection_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115332,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.16.A Responsible Tax Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_16_A_Responsible_Tax_Strategy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.16.A Responsible Tax Strategy",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available global tax strategy, which is approved by the highest governance body?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company has a public global tax approach and discloses its corporate income tax payments on a country-by-country basis.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C20_Responsible_tax_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_16_Responsible_tax_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_tax_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_16_A_Responsible_Tax_Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115344,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.16.B Responsible Tax Strategy Accountability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_16_B_Responsible_Tax_Strategy_Accountability.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.16.B Responsible Tax Strategy Accountability",
      "question": "Does the company have a governance body or executive-level position tasked with accountability for compliance with the company's global tax strategy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company has a public global tax approach and discloses its corporate income tax payments on a country-by-country basis.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C20_Responsible_tax_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_16_Responsible_tax_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_tax_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_16_B_Responsible_Tax_Strategy_Accountability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115356,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.16.C Corporate Income Tax Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_16_C_Corporate_Income_Tax_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.16.C Corporate Income Tax Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company clearly disclose the amount of corporate income tax paid for each tax jurisdiction where the company is a resident for tax purposes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company has a public global tax approach and discloses its corporate income tax payments on a country-by-country basis.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Country-by-Country Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C20_Responsible_tax_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_16_Responsible_tax_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_tax_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_16_C_Corporate_Income_Tax_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115368,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.17.A Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_A_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_Policy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.17.A Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement prohibiting bribery and corruption?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company publicly prohibits bribery and corruption and takes steps to identify and address bribery and corruption risks and incidents.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.17.A Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_A_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_Policy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C21_Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_A_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115380,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.17.B Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption Process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_B_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_Process.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.17.B Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption Process",
      "question": "Does the company describe the process(es) to identify its bribery and corruption risks and impacts in specific locations or activities covering its own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company publicly prohibits bribery and corruption and takes steps to identify and address bribery and corruption risks and incidents.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.17.B Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption Process+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_B_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_Process+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C21_Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_B_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_Process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115392,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.17.C Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption In Contractual Agreements",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_C_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_In_Contractual_Agreements.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.17.C Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption In Contractual Agreements",
      "question": "Does the company include anti-bribery and anti-corruption clauses in its contracts with business relationships?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company publicly prohibits bribery and corruption and takes steps to identify and address bribery and corruption risks and incidents.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.17.C Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption In Contractual Agreements+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_C_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_In_Contractual_Agreements+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C21_Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_C_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_In_Contractual_Agreements+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115404,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.17.D Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption Complaint Mechanism",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_D_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_Complaint_Mechanism.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.17.D Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption Complaint Mechanism",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it has a confidential and anonymous channel/mechanism accessible to all stakeholders to raise bribery and corruption concerns and complaints without fear of reprisals?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company publicly prohibits bribery and corruption and takes steps to identify and address bribery and corruption risks and incidents.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.17.D Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption Complaint Mechanism+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_D_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_Complaint_Mechanism+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C21_Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_D_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_Complaint_Mechanism+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115416,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.18.A Responsible Lobbying and Political Engagement Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_18_A_Responsible_Lobbying_and_Political_Engagement_Policy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.18.A Responsible Lobbying and Political Engagement Policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement(s) (or policy(ies) setting out its lobbying and political engagement approach?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company has an approach to lobbying and political engagement and has related controls in place.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C22_Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_18_Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_18_A_Responsible_Lobbying_and_Political_Engagement_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115428,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.18.B Political Contributions Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_18_B_Political_Contributions_Policy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.18.B Political Contributions Policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement that specifies that it does not make political contributions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company has an approach to lobbying and political engagement and has related controls in place.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C22_Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_18_Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_18_B_Political_Contributions_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115439,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.18.C Lobbying Expenditures Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_18_C_Lobbying_Expenditures_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.18.C Lobbying Expenditures Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its expenditures on lobbying activities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company has an approach to lobbying and political engagement and has related controls in place.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C22_Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_18_Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_18_C_Lobbying_Expenditures_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18115451,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.18.D Third-Party Political Lobbying and Engagement Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_18_D_Third_Party_Political_Lobbying_and_Engagement_Policy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.18.D Third-Party Political Lobbying and Engagement Policy",
      "question": "Does the company require third-party lobbyists to comply with its lobbying and political engagement policy (or policies)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/nature/about/|here]]. Sources and Alignments for each indicator can be found [[https://assets.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/app/uploads/2022/08/The-2022-Nature-Benchmark-Methodology-20-August-update.pdf|here]] as well as the scoring guidelines [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/2023-nature-benchmark-scoring-guidelines/|here]] </p><p>The World Benchmarking Alliance's Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect our environment and its biodiversity.</p><p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p>This metric relates to the Indicator: The company has an approach to lobbying and political engagement and has related controls in place.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.</p><p></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C22_Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_18_Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_18_D_Third_Party_Political_Lobbying_and_Engagement_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18819481,
      "name": "Vu Nguyen+AGL's current state in dealing with its operations against increase of Emission.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Vu_Nguyen+AGL_s_current_state_in_dealing_with_its_operations_against_increase_of_Emission.json",
      "designer": "Vu Nguyen",
      "title": "AGL's current state in dealing with its operations against increase of Emission.",
      "question": "How can AGL perform and action on their pathway of heading to Net-Zero Emission commitment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>chrome-extension://gphandlahdpffmccakmbngmbjnjiiahp/https://www.agl.com.au/content/dam/digital/agl/documents/about-agl/investors/2023/230810-agl-energy-tcfd-report-2023-5-5.pdf</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Integrated Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Vu_Nguyen+AGL_s_current_state_in_dealing_with_its_operations_against_increase_of_Emission+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18823564,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A01 Sustainability Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A01_Sustainability_Strategy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A01 Sustainability Strategy",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.A01 Sustainability Strategy in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>A corporate sustainability strategy prioritizes and embeds sustainability objectives and targets and helps the company to deliver on key Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It facilitates the company’s ability to adapt and change through forward planning, increasing its resilience, managing risks and protecting workers, the company and society at large.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Materiality Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A01 Sustainability Strategy+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var score;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  0.25 * score(strategy_disclosure) + 0.25 * score(strategy_coverage) + 0.25 * score(group_wide_strategy) + 0.25 * score(strategy_reporting);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18113424",
          "name": "strategy_disclosure"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113436",
          "name": "strategy_coverage"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113448",
          "name": "group_wide_strategy"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113460",
          "name": "strategy_reporting"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A01_Sustainability_Strategy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A01_Sustainability_Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18823574,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A01 Sustainability Strategy+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A01_Sustainability_Strategy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A01 Sustainability Strategy",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.A01 Sustainability Strategy in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>A corporate sustainability strategy prioritizes and embeds sustainability objectives and targets and helps the company to deliver on key Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It facilitates the company’s ability to adapt and change through forward planning, increasing its resilience, managing risks and protecting workers, the company and society at large.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Materiality Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Governance_and_strategy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A01_Sustainability_Strategy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18823587,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A02 Accountability for Sustainable Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A02_Accountability_for_Sustainable_Strategy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A02 Accountability for Sustainable Strategy",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.A02 Accountability for Sustainable Strategy in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Linking sustainable development objectives and targets to roles and remuneration is important to ensure the accountability of the company in relation to its contribution to sustainable development objectives and targets. Ensuring capability within decision-making bodies further indicates a company’s commitment to transitioning to a sustainable future.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Materiality Assessment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A02 Accountability for Sustainable Strategy+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var score;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  0.25 * score(responsibility_for_sustainable_strategy) + 0.25 * score(acoountability_for_assignation) + 0.25 * score(accountability_for_renumeration) + 0.25 * score(accountability_for_evidence);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18113472",
          "name": "responsibility_for_sustainable_strategy"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113484",
          "name": "acoountability_for_assignation"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113496",
          "name": "accountability_for_renumeration"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113508",
          "name": "accountability_for_evidence"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A02_Accountability_for_Sustainable_Strategy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A02_Accountability_for_Sustainable_Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18823597,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A02 Accountability for Sustainable Strategy+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A02_Accountability_for_Sustainable_Strategy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A02 Accountability for Sustainable Strategy",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.A02 Accountability for Sustainable Strategy in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Linking sustainable development objectives and targets to roles and remuneration is important to ensure the accountability of the company in relation to its contribution to sustainable development objectives and targets. Ensuring capability within decision-making bodies further indicates a company’s commitment to transitioning to a sustainable future.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Materiality Assessment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Governance_and_strategy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A02_Accountability_for_Sustainable_Strategy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18823615,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A03 Stakeholder Engagement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_Stakeholder_Engagement.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A03 Stakeholder Engagement",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.A03 Stakeholder Engagement in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Serving the interests of all stakeholders is key to businesses’ long-term success. Regularly engaging with stakeholders contributes to the company’s understanding of diverse and frequently opposing perspectives, drives innovation and helps to shape robust and inclusive approaches. Companies are expected to engage in meaningful stakeholder engagement. Engagement processes are expected to produce a clear output or action and an acknowledgment of how stakeholder inputs are used. </p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A03 Stakeholder Engagement+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var engagements, score;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  engagements = [stakeholder_issue_disclosure, stakeholder_identification, stakeholder_process_disclosure, stakeholder_outcomes, stakeholder_coverage];\n\n  engagements.reduce(function(weighted_sum, engagement) {\n    return weighted_sum + 0.2 * score(engagement);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18113520",
          "name": "stakeholder_issue_disclosure"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113532",
          "name": "stakeholder_identification"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113544",
          "name": "stakeholder_process_disclosure"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113556",
          "name": "stakeholder_outcomes"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113568",
          "name": "stakeholder_coverage"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_Stakeholder_Engagement+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_Stakeholder_Engagement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18823640,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A03 Stakeholder Engagement+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_Stakeholder_Engagement+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A03 Stakeholder Engagement",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.A03 Stakeholder Engagement in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Serving the interests of all stakeholders is key to businesses’ long-term success. Regularly engaging with stakeholders contributes to the company’s understanding of diverse and frequently opposing perspectives, drives innovation and helps to shape robust and inclusive approaches. Companies are expected to engage in meaningful stakeholder engagement. Engagement processes are expected to produce a clear output or action and an acknowledgment of how stakeholder inputs are used. </p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Governance_and_strategy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A03_Stakeholder_Engagement+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18823646,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A04 Lobbying and advocacy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_Lobbying_and_advocacy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A04 Lobbying and advocacy",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.A04 Lobbying and advocacy in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Both individually and through trade associations, companies should advocate nature-positive policies and regulations. Companies should not finance trade associations that undermine nature-positive policies, including regarding the climate. Companies should conduct regular due diligence on the trade associations they support, and fully disclose the names of the associations, the alignment of their lobbying activities with policies and regulations that support nature-positive outcomes and their action plans to correct any misalignment.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A04 Lobbying and advocacy+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var lobbying_advocacy, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.2, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.2];\n\n  lobbying_advocacy = [lobbying_advocacy_associations, lobbying_advocacy_assessment_framework, lobbying_advocacy_framework_application, lobbying_advocacy_misalignment_reporting, lobbying_advocacy_action_plan, lobbying_advocacy_action_plan_deadlines, lobbying_advocacy_annual_review];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(lobbying_advocacy[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18113580",
          "name": "lobbying_advocacy_associations"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113592",
          "name": "lobbying_advocacy_assessment_framework"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113604",
          "name": "lobbying_advocacy_framework_application"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113616",
          "name": "lobbying_advocacy_misalignment_reporting"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113628",
          "name": "lobbying_advocacy_action_plan"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113640",
          "name": "lobbying_advocacy_action_plan_deadlines"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113652",
          "name": "lobbying_advocacy_annual_review"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_Lobbying_and_advocacy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_Lobbying_and_advocacy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18823656,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.A04 Lobbying and advocacy+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_Lobbying_and_advocacy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.A04 Lobbying and advocacy",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.A04 Lobbying and advocacy in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Both individually and through trade associations, companies should advocate nature-positive policies and regulations. Companies should not finance trade associations that undermine nature-positive policies, including regarding the climate. Companies should conduct regular due diligence on the trade associations they support, and fully disclose the names of the associations, the alignment of their lobbying activities with policies and regulations that support nature-positive outcomes and their action plans to correct any misalignment.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Governance_and_strategy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_A04_Lobbying_and_advocacy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18823662,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Governance and strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Governance_and_strategy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Governance and strategy",
      "question": "What did the company score for Governance and strategy in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Materiality Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18823574",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18823597",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18823640",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18823656",
          "weight": 25
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nature_Benchmark_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Governance_and_strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824421,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B01 Assessments of impacts on nature",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_Assessments_of_impacts_on_nature.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B01 Assessments of impacts on nature",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B01 Assessments of impacts on nature in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Impacts on nature can be broadly described as changes in the state of ecosystems and species, resulting from human activity, occurring because of both direct and indirect drivers of biodiversity loss (IPBES, 2019). The benefits provided by biodiversity are essential to human wellbeing. Yet despite past and current efforts, biodiversity continues to deteriorate and could reach a disastrous tipping point under business-as-usual conditions. This is becoming a major concern for corporate activity, and there is growing demand for companies to disclose reliable data on this topic. However, according to the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB, 2021), this is currently no common practice and only around 10% of companies (CDSB, 2020) report high-level commitments and some relevant metrics. Disclosure will play a key role in achieving global biodiversity targets and in triggering the systemic changes required to do so.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B01 Assessments of impacts on nature+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var assessments_of_impacts_on_nature, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else if (x === \"Partially\") {\n      return 5;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.25, 0.125, 0.125, 0.25, 0.25];\n\n  assessments_of_impacts_on_nature = [impacts_on_nature, impacts_on_upstream_value_chain, impacts_on_downstream_value_chain, impacts_on_stakeholder, impacts_on_nature_including_biodiversity];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(assessments_of_impacts_on_nature[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18113712",
          "name": "impacts_on_nature"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113724",
          "name": "impacts_on_upstream_value_chain"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113736",
          "name": "impacts_on_downstream_value_chain"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113748",
          "name": "impacts_on_stakeholder"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113760",
          "name": "impacts_on_nature_including_biodiversity"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_Assessments_of_impacts_on_nature+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_Assessments_of_impacts_on_nature+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824430,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B01 Assessments of impacts on nature+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_Assessments_of_impacts_on_nature+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B01 Assessments of impacts on nature",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B01 Assessments of impacts on nature in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Impacts on nature can be broadly described as changes in the state of ecosystems and species, resulting from human activity, occurring because of both direct and indirect drivers of biodiversity loss (IPBES, 2019). The benefits provided by biodiversity are essential to human wellbeing. Yet despite past and current efforts, biodiversity continues to deteriorate and could reach a disastrous tipping point under business-as-usual conditions. This is becoming a major concern for corporate activity, and there is growing demand for companies to disclose reliable data on this topic. However, according to the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB, 2021), this is currently no common practice and only around 10% of companies (CDSB, 2020) report high-level commitments and some relevant metrics. Disclosure will play a key role in achieving global biodiversity targets and in triggering the systemic changes required to do so.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B01_Assessments_of_impacts_on_nature+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824527,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B02 Assessment of dependencies on nature",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B02_Assessment_of_dependencies_on_nature.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B02 Assessment of dependencies on nature",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B02 Assessment of dependencies on nature in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Nature’s contributions to people (NCP), or ecosystem services, are the benefits that humans derive from ecosystems and on which human life and activities, including corporate activities, rely. Research shows that more than 50% of global gross domestic product is directly linked to these ecosystem services (WEF and PwC, 2020), with most companies depending on nature, including biodiversity and NCP, as part of their business model. Thus, for companies to understand their relation to biodiversity, it is necessary that they assess not only their impacts but also their dependencies.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B02 Assessment of dependencies on nature+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var dependencies_on_nature, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.5, 0.125, 0.125, 0.25];\n\n  dependencies_on_nature = [dependencies_on_nature, dependencies_on_upstream_value_chain, dependencies_on_downstream_value_chain, dependencies_on_nature_quantification];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(dependencies_on_nature[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18113772",
          "name": "dependencies_on_nature"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113784",
          "name": "dependencies_on_upstream_value_chain"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113796",
          "name": "dependencies_on_downstream_value_chain"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113808",
          "name": "dependencies_on_nature_quantification"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B02_Assessment_of_dependencies_on_nature+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B02_Assessment_of_dependencies_on_nature+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824537,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B02 Assessment of dependencies on nature+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B02_Assessment_of_dependencies_on_nature+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B02 Assessment of dependencies on nature",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B02 Assessment of dependencies on nature in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Nature’s contributions to people (NCP), or ecosystem services, are the benefits that humans derive from ecosystems and on which human life and activities, including corporate activities, rely. Research shows that more than 50% of global gross domestic product is directly linked to these ecosystem services (WEF and PwC, 2020), with most companies depending on nature, including biodiversity and NCP, as part of their business model. Thus, for companies to understand their relation to biodiversity, it is necessary that they assess not only their impacts but also their dependencies.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B02_Assessment_of_dependencies_on_nature+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824562,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B03 Key areas important for biodiversity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B03_Key_areas_important_for_biodiversity.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B03 Key areas important for biodiversity",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B03 Key areas important for biodiversity in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>According to the Key Biodiversity Areas Partnership (KBA Partnership, 2018), one of the main issues driving biodiversity loss is the destruction, degradation and overexploitation of nature. It is therefore a priority for companies to identify which areas of our planet where they operate – including their value chain – are critical to protect. Global goals and targets on biodiversity are currently under negotiation and should be adopted in 2022 as the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). The current negotiating draft of the GBF includes a goal of ‘an increase of at least 15% in the area, connectivity and integrity of natural ecosystems’, and a target to conserve ‘at least 30% globally of land areas and of sea areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and its contributions to people’ (CBD, 2021).</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B03 Key areas important for biodiversity+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var key_areas_for_biodiversity, redistributed_weights, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else if (x === \"Partially\") {\n      return 5;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  redistributed_weights = function(weights, values) {\n    var i, index, j, k, len, len1, num_of_weighted_values, redistributed_weight_value, value, weight;\n    num_of_weighted_values = weights.length;\n    for (index = j = 0, len = values.length; j < len; index = ++j) {\n      value = values[index];\n      if (value === \"Not Applicable\") {\n        num_of_weighted_values -= 1;\n        redistributed_weight_value = weights[index];\n        for (i = k = 0, len1 = weights.length; k < len1; i = ++k) {\n          weight = weights[i];\n          if (weight === 0) {\n            continue;\n          }\n          weights[i] = weight + redistributed_weight_value / num_of_weighted_values;\n        }\n        weights[index] = 0;\n      }\n    }\n    return weights;\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25];\n\n  key_areas_for_biodiversity = [location_disclosure, key_areas_for_biodiversity_disclosure, key_areas_for_upstream_relationships, key_areas_for_management_plan];\n\n  redistributed_weights(weights, key_areas_for_biodiversity);\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(key_areas_for_biodiversity[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18113820",
          "name": "location_disclosure"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113832",
          "name": "key_areas_for_biodiversity_disclosure"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113844",
          "name": "key_areas_for_upstream_relationships"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113856",
          "name": "key_areas_for_management_plan"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B03_Key_areas_important_for_biodiversity+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B03_Key_areas_important_for_biodiversity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824584,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B03 Key areas important for biodiversity+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B03_Key_areas_important_for_biodiversity+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B03 Key areas important for biodiversity",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B03 Key areas important for biodiversity in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>According to the Key Biodiversity Areas Partnership (KBA Partnership, 2018), one of the main issues driving biodiversity loss is the destruction, degradation and overexploitation of nature. It is therefore a priority for companies to identify which areas of our planet where they operate – including their value chain – are critical to protect. Global goals and targets on biodiversity are currently under negotiation and should be adopted in 2022 as the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). The current negotiating draft of the GBF includes a goal of ‘an increase of at least 15% in the area, connectivity and integrity of natural ecosystems’, and a target to conserve ‘at least 30% globally of land areas and of sea areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and its contributions to people’ (CBD, 2021).</p><p> </p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B03_Key_areas_important_for_biodiversity+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824596,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B04 Key species",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_Key_species.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B04 Key species",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B04 Key species in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Despite past multilateral policy efforts, like the Aichi Targets that expired in 2020, the rate of species extinction is approximately 1,000 times higher than ever before, and the total number of wild mammals is declining by 82% compared to historical records (WEF and PwC, 2020). As scientists have put bluntly, we are witnessing a ‘biological annihilation’ amounting to the sixth mass extinction. In the past, the major threats to species have been well documented. However, establishing specific targets for threat reduction is complex because there are large numbers of threatened species as well as rapid deterioration of habitats. Along with efforts to preserve key areas for biodiversity, companies can contribute to the process of halting species abundance and richness loss and extinction.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B04 Key species+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var key_species, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2];\n\n  key_species = [key_species_disclosure, key_species_upstream_relationship, key_species_status, key_species_status_upstream_relationship, key_species_conservation_strategy];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(key_species[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18113868",
          "name": "key_species_disclosure"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113880",
          "name": "key_species_upstream_relationship"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113892",
          "name": "key_species_status"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113904",
          "name": "key_species_status_upstream_relationship"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113916",
          "name": "key_species_conservation_strategy"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_Key_species+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_Key_species+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824606,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B04 Key species+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_Key_species+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B04 Key species",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B04 Key species in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Despite past multilateral policy efforts, like the Aichi Targets that expired in 2020, the rate of species extinction is approximately 1,000 times higher than ever before, and the total number of wild mammals is declining by 82% compared to historical records (WEF and PwC, 2020). As scientists have put bluntly, we are witnessing a ‘biological annihilation’ amounting to the sixth mass extinction. In the past, the major threats to species have been well documented. However, establishing specific targets for threat reduction is complex because there are large numbers of threatened species as well as rapid deterioration of habitats. Along with efforts to preserve key areas for biodiversity, companies can contribute to the process of halting species abundance and richness loss and extinction.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B04_Key_species+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824611,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B05 Ecosystem Conversion",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_Ecosystem_Conversion.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B05 Ecosystem Conversion",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B05 Ecosystem Conversion in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Land use change through the conversion of natural habitats is among the most significant drivers of biodiversity loss in terrestrial ecosystems. Agricultural production alone is responsible for 80% (WWF, 2020) of global deforestation. Moreover, extractive sectors including the metals and mining and oil and gas sectors have significant impact on converting ecosystems through their business activities, including land degradation or conversion of wetlands. Aligning with the SBTN interim targets to ensure zero deforestation and conversion from 2020 in all corporate supply chains, this indicator focuses on ensuring companies set targets to minimize their footprint across all relevant ecosystem realms. </p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Conversion for Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Materiality Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B05 Ecosystem Conversion+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var ecosystem_conversion, redistributed_weights, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  redistributed_weights = function(weights, values) {\n    var i, index, j, k, len, len1, num_of_weighted_values, redistributed_weight_value, value, weight;\n    num_of_weighted_values = weights.length;\n    for (index = j = 0, len = values.length; j < len; index = ++j) {\n      value = values[index];\n      if (value === \"Not Applicable\") {\n        num_of_weighted_values -= 1;\n        redistributed_weight_value = weights[index];\n        for (i = k = 0, len1 = weights.length; k < len1; i = ++k) {\n          weight = weights[i];\n          if (weight === 0) {\n            continue;\n          }\n          weights[i] = weight + redistributed_weight_value / num_of_weighted_values;\n        }\n        weights[index] = 0;\n      }\n    }\n    return weights;\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1];\n\n  ecosystem_conversion = [commitment, evidence, time_bound_targets, high_risk_commodities, sourcing_disclosure, coversion_free_supply_chain, minimization_commitment, minimization_evidence, minimization_system_disclosure, minimization_targets_disclosure];\n\n  redistributed_weights(weights, ecosystem_conversion);\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(ecosystem_conversion[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18113928",
          "name": "commitment"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113940",
          "name": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113952",
          "name": "time_bound_targets"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113964",
          "name": "high_risk_commodities"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113976",
          "name": "sourcing_disclosure"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18113988",
          "name": "coversion_free_supply_chain"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114000",
          "name": "minimization_commitment"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114012",
          "name": "minimization_evidence"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114024",
          "name": "minimization_system_disclosure"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114036",
          "name": "minimization_targets_disclosure"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_Ecosystem_Conversion+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_Ecosystem_Conversion+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824620,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B05 Ecosystem Conversion+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_Ecosystem_Conversion+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B05 Ecosystem Conversion",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B05 Ecosystem Conversion in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Land use change through the conversion of natural habitats is among the most significant drivers of biodiversity loss in terrestrial ecosystems. Agricultural production alone is responsible for 80% (WWF, 2020) of global deforestation. Moreover, extractive sectors including the metals and mining and oil and gas sectors have significant impact on converting ecosystems through their business activities, including land degradation or conversion of wetlands. Aligning with the SBTN interim targets to ensure zero deforestation and conversion from 2020 in all corporate supply chains, this indicator focuses on ensuring companies set targets to minimize their footprint across all relevant ecosystem realms. </p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Conversion for Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Materiality Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B05_Ecosystem_Conversion+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824625,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B06 Ecosystem Restoration",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B06_Ecosystem_Restoration.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B06 Ecosystem Restoration",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B06 Ecosystem Restoration in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The UN has declared the ten years to 2030 the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration – a rallying call for the protection and restoration of ecosystems for the benefit of both people and nature. This indicator aligns with the SBTN interim targets on ensuring that a proportion of natural or semi-natural habitats are retained or regenerated in working lands from 2020, and areas under restoration in all ecosystems are increased.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B06 Ecosystem Restoration+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var ecosystem_restoration, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25];\n\n  ecosystem_restoration = [commitment, project_outcomes, time_bound_targets, project_outcomes_on_areas_beyond_own_operations];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(ecosystem_restoration[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114048",
          "name": "commitment"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114060",
          "name": "project_outcomes"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114072",
          "name": "time_bound_targets"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114084",
          "name": "project_outcomes_on_areas_beyond_own_operations"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B06_Ecosystem_Restoration+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B06_Ecosystem_Restoration+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824635,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B06 Ecosystem Restoration+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B06_Ecosystem_Restoration+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B06 Ecosystem Restoration",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B06 Ecosystem Restoration in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>The UN has declared the ten years to 2030 the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration – a rallying call for the protection and restoration of ecosystems for the benefit of both people and nature. This indicator aligns with the SBTN interim targets on ensuring that a proportion of natural or semi-natural habitats are retained or regenerated in working lands from 2020, and areas under restoration in all ecosystems are increased.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B06_Ecosystem_Restoration+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824640,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B07 Resource exploitation and circularity performance",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_Resource_exploitation_and_circularity_performance.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B07 Resource exploitation and circularity performance",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B07 Resource exploitation and circularity performance in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The current dependence on a linear economy is largely responsible for most impacts on nature and biodiversity. Some 90% of biodiversity loss is caused by the way we extract and process materials, fuels and food (UNEP, 2019). Approximately 60 billion tons of renewable and nonrenewable resources are extracted yearly, a 15% augmentation since the 1980s (IPBES, 2019). Furthermore, following land and sea use change, the largest negative impact on nature is the direct exploitation, especially overexploitation, of natural resources and organisms via harvesting, logging, hunting and fishing (IPBES, 2019). By decoupling economic prosperity from resource consumption and environmental degradation, circularity offers opportunities for new and better growth that not only help safeguard and rebuild biodiversity but also provide benefits. </p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B07 Resource exploitation and circularity performance+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var redistributed_weights, resource_exploitation, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else if (x === \"Partially\") {\n      return 5;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  redistributed_weights = function(weights, values) {\n    var i, index, j, k, len, len1, num_of_weighted_values, redistributed_weight_value, value, weight;\n    num_of_weighted_values = weights.length;\n    for (index = j = 0, len = values.length; j < len; index = ++j) {\n      value = values[index];\n      if (value === \"Not Applicable\") {\n        num_of_weighted_values -= 1;\n        redistributed_weight_value = weights[index];\n        for (i = k = 0, len1 = weights.length; k < len1; i = ++k) {\n          weight = weights[i];\n          if (weight === 0) {\n            continue;\n          }\n          weights[i] = weight + redistributed_weight_value / num_of_weighted_values;\n        }\n        weights[index] = 0;\n      }\n    }\n    return weights;\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.1, 0.2, 0.1, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2];\n\n  resource_exploitation = [evidence, input_disclosure, organism_exploitation, management_plan, reporting, decoupling_finance_and_consumption];\n\n  redistributed_weights(weights, resource_exploitation);\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(resource_exploitation[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114096",
          "name": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114108",
          "name": "input_disclosure"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114120",
          "name": "organism_exploitation"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114132",
          "name": "management_plan"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114144",
          "name": "reporting"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114156",
          "name": "decoupling_finance_and_consumption"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_Resource_exploitation_and_circularity_performance+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_Resource_exploitation_and_circularity_performance+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824650,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B07 Resource exploitation and circularity performance+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_Resource_exploitation_and_circularity_performance+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B07 Resource exploitation and circularity performance",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B07 Resource exploitation and circularity performance in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>The current dependence on a linear economy is largely responsible for most impacts on nature and biodiversity. Some 90% of biodiversity loss is caused by the way we extract and process materials, fuels and food (UNEP, 2019). Approximately 60 billion tons of renewable and nonrenewable resources are extracted yearly, a 15% augmentation since the 1980s (IPBES, 2019). Furthermore, following land and sea use change, the largest negative impact on nature is the direct exploitation, especially overexploitation, of natural resources and organisms via harvesting, logging, hunting and fishing (IPBES, 2019). By decoupling economic prosperity from resource consumption and environmental degradation, circularity offers opportunities for new and better growth that not only help safeguard and rebuild biodiversity but also provide benefits. </p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B07_Resource_exploitation_and_circularity_performance+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824655,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B08 Soil Health",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_Soil_Health.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B08 Soil Health",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B08 Soil Health in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Over 40% of living organisms in terrestrial ecosystems associate directly with soils during their life cycle, making soils among the most important reservoirs of biodiversity (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). However, current unsustainable agricultural practices and other business activities have led to the degradation of around one-third of the world’s soil, resulting in significant negative impacts on biodiversity and soil health (TEEB, 2018). This indicator focuses on practices that reduce soil degradation and encourage regeneration in the system by improving soil health and agrobiodiversity.These include helping to tackle climate change, improving air and water quality and reducing the cost of accessing goods and services.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Soil Contamination",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Monoculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B08 Soil Health+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var redistributed_weights, score, soil_health, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  redistributed_weights = function(weights, values) {\n    var i, index, j, k, len, len1, num_of_weighted_values, redistributed_weight_value, value, weight;\n    num_of_weighted_values = weights.length;\n    for (index = j = 0, len = values.length; j < len; index = ++j) {\n      value = values[index];\n      if (value === \"Not Applicable\") {\n        num_of_weighted_values -= 1;\n        redistributed_weight_value = weights[index];\n        for (i = k = 0, len1 = weights.length; k < len1; i = ++k) {\n          weight = weights[i];\n          if (weight === 0) {\n            continue;\n          }\n          weights[i] = weight + redistributed_weight_value / num_of_weighted_values;\n        }\n        weights[index] = 0;\n      }\n    }\n    return weights;\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2];\n\n  soil_health = [increasing_agrobiodiversity_evidence, agrobiodiversity_evidence, soil_health_targers_reporting, agrobiodiversity_impact, agrobiodiversity_targets_reporting];\n\n  redistributed_weights(weights, soil_health);\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(soil_health[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114168",
          "name": "increasing_agrobiodiversity_evidence"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114180",
          "name": "agrobiodiversity_evidence"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114192",
          "name": "soil_health_targers_reporting"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114216",
          "name": "agrobiodiversity_impact"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114204",
          "name": "agrobiodiversity_targets_reporting"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_Soil_Health+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_Soil_Health+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824665,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B08 Soil Health+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_Soil_Health+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B08 Soil Health",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B08 Soil Health in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Over 40% of living organisms in terrestrial ecosystems associate directly with soils during their life cycle, making soils among the most important reservoirs of biodiversity (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). However, current unsustainable agricultural practices and other business activities have led to the degradation of around one-third of the world’s soil, resulting in significant negative impacts on biodiversity and soil health (TEEB, 2018). This indicator focuses on practices that reduce soil degradation and encourage regeneration in the system by improving soil health and agrobiodiversity.These include helping to tackle climate change, improving air and water quality and reducing the cost of accessing goods and services.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Soil Contamination",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Monoculture"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B08_Soil_Health+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824670,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B09 Water withdrawal",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_Water_withdrawal.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B09 Water withdrawal",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B09 Water withdrawal in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>One-fifth of the world’s river basins are experiencing significant changes in surface water available in the last five years (UN Water, 2021). Increasing exploitation of water resources is likely to lead to disruptions in ecosystem services in terms of renewing and purifying water resources. This indicator is aligned with the SBTN interim target to reduce water withdrawal in the most material parts of the value chain in line with environmental flow needs by 2030.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B09 Water withdrawal+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var i, redistributed_weights, score, water_withdrawal, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  redistributed_weights = function(weights, values) {\n    var i, index, j, k, len, len1, num_of_weighted_values, redistributed_weight_value, value, weight;\n    num_of_weighted_values = weights.length;\n    for (index = j = 0, len = values.length; j < len; index = ++j) {\n      value = values[index];\n      if (value === \"Not Applicable\") {\n        num_of_weighted_values -= 1;\n        redistributed_weight_value = weights[index];\n        for (i = k = 0, len1 = weights.length; k < len1; i = ++k) {\n          weight = weights[i];\n          if (weight === 0) {\n            continue;\n          }\n          weights[i] = weight + redistributed_weight_value / num_of_weighted_values;\n        }\n        weights[index] = 0;\n      }\n    }\n    return weights;\n  };\n\n  weights = (function() {\n    var j, results;\n    results = [];\n    for (i = j = 0; j < 6; i = ++j) {\n      results.push(1 / 6);\n    }\n    return results;\n  })();\n\n  water_withdrawal = [reduction_disclosure, reduction_target, water_stressed_area_dependency, withdrawal_from_water_stressed_areas, reduction_engagement, water_stressed_area_dependency_in_supply_chain];\n\n  redistributed_weights(weights, water_withdrawal);\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(water_withdrawal[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114228",
          "name": "reduction_disclosure"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114240",
          "name": "reduction_target"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114252",
          "name": "water_stressed_area_dependency"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114264",
          "name": "withdrawal_from_water_stressed_areas"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114276",
          "name": "reduction_engagement"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114288",
          "name": "water_stressed_area_dependency_in_supply_chain"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_Water_withdrawal+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_Water_withdrawal+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824680,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B09 Water withdrawal+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_Water_withdrawal+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B09 Water withdrawal",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B09 Water withdrawal in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>One-fifth of the world’s river basins are experiencing significant changes in surface water available in the last five years (UN Water, 2021). Increasing exploitation of water resources is likely to lead to disruptions in ecosystem services in terms of renewing and purifying water resources. This indicator is aligned with the SBTN interim target to reduce water withdrawal in the most material parts of the value chain in line with environmental flow needs by 2030.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B09_Water_withdrawal+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824685,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B10Water quality",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B10Water_quality.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B10Water quality",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B10 Water quality in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Approximately 80% of global wastewater is untreated when released back into the environment, causing significant negative effects on both ecosystem functioning and human health (IUCN, n.d.). This indicator is aligned with the SBTN interim target to reduce water quality pressures in high-impact parts of the value chain in line with good ambient water quality by 2030. </p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B10Water quality+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var score, water_quality, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25];\n\n  water_quality = [pressure_reduction, discharge_water_quality, reporting, pressure_reduction_targets];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(water_quality[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114300",
          "name": "pressure_reduction"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114312",
          "name": "discharge_water_quality"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114324",
          "name": "reporting"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114336",
          "name": "pressure_reduction_targets"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B10Water_quality+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B10Water_quality+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824695,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B10Water quality+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B10Water_quality+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B10Water quality",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B10 Water quality in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Approximately 80% of global wastewater is untreated when released back into the environment, causing significant negative effects on both ecosystem functioning and human health (IUCN, n.d.). This indicator is aligned with the SBTN interim target to reduce water quality pressures in high-impact parts of the value chain in line with good ambient water quality by 2030. </p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B10Water_quality+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824700,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B11 Hazardous substances and waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_Hazardous_substances_and_waste.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B11 Hazardous substances and waste",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B11 Hazardous substances and waste in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Pollution is among the primary drivers of biodiversity loss, with large amounts of hazardous chemicals and other pollutants affecting ecosystem function and leading to population decline (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). Persistence of such hazardous substances and waste in the environment can lead to uptake by wildlife and humans resulting in reproductive and carcinogenic effects. As such, this indicator covers the production and management of hazardous substances as well as waste management.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B11 Hazardous substances and waste+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var hazardous_substances_and_waste, i, redistributed_weights, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  redistributed_weights = function(weights, values) {\n    var i, index, j, k, len, len1, num_of_weighted_values, redistributed_weight_value, value, weight;\n    num_of_weighted_values = weights.length;\n    for (index = j = 0, len = values.length; j < len; index = ++j) {\n      value = values[index];\n      if (value === \"Not Applicable\") {\n        num_of_weighted_values -= 1;\n        redistributed_weight_value = weights[index];\n        for (i = k = 0, len1 = weights.length; k < len1; i = ++k) {\n          weight = weights[i];\n          if (weight === 0) {\n            continue;\n          }\n          weights[i] = weight + redistributed_weight_value / num_of_weighted_values;\n        }\n        weights[index] = 0;\n      }\n    }\n    return weights;\n  };\n\n  weights = (function() {\n    var j, results;\n    results = [];\n    for (i = j = 0; j < 6; i = ++j) {\n      results.push(1 / 6);\n    }\n    return results;\n  })();\n\n  hazardous_substances_and_waste = [reduction_evidence, phase_out_targets, svhc, waste_reduction_evidence, waste_reduction_targets, waste_reporting];\n\n  redistributed_weights(weights, hazardous_substances_and_waste);\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(hazardous_substances_and_waste[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114348",
          "name": "reduction_evidence"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114360",
          "name": "phase_out_targets"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114372",
          "name": "svhc"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114384",
          "name": "waste_reduction_evidence"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114396",
          "name": "waste_reduction_targets"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114408",
          "name": "waste_reporting"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_Hazardous_substances_and_waste+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_Hazardous_substances_and_waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824709,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B11 Hazardous substances and waste+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_Hazardous_substances_and_waste+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B11 Hazardous substances and waste",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B11 Hazardous substances and waste in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Pollution is among the primary drivers of biodiversity loss, with large amounts of hazardous chemicals and other pollutants affecting ecosystem function and leading to population decline (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). Persistence of such hazardous substances and waste in the environment can lead to uptake by wildlife and humans resulting in reproductive and carcinogenic effects. As such, this indicator covers the production and management of hazardous substances as well as waste management.</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B11_Hazardous_substances_and_waste+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824714,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B12 Plastic use and waste",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_Plastic_use_and_waste.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B12 Plastic use and waste",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B12 Plastic use and waste in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Since the 1980s, plastic pollution is estimated to have increased tenfold (IPBES, 2018). Estimates suggest that global plastic production will double by 2050, of which approximately 8 million tonnes will end up as marine debris (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). The debris breaks into microplastics that are then ingested by marine organisms, leading to toxic effects on their feeding, growth and reproductive patterns. Due to plastic’s prolonged negative impact on ecosystems and biodiversity, this indicator focuses on reducing plastic use and waste from the private sector through globally applicable commitments and targets. </p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B12 Plastic use and waste+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var plastic_use_and_waste, redistributed_weights, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  redistributed_weights = function(weights, values) {\n    var i, index, j, k, len, len1, num_of_weighted_values, redistributed_weight_value, value, weight;\n    num_of_weighted_values = weights.length;\n    for (index = j = 0, len = values.length; j < len; index = ++j) {\n      value = values[index];\n      if (value === \"Not Applicable\") {\n        num_of_weighted_values -= 1;\n        redistributed_weight_value = weights[index];\n        for (i = k = 0, len1 = weights.length; k < len1; i = ++k) {\n          weight = weights[i];\n          if (weight === 0) {\n            continue;\n          }\n          weights[i] = weight + redistributed_weight_value / num_of_weighted_values;\n        }\n        weights[index] = 0;\n      }\n    }\n    return weights;\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.15, 0.15, 0.25, 0.15, 0.15, 0.075, 0.075];\n\n  plastic_use_and_waste = [reduction_qualitative_evidence, reduction_quantitative_evidence, reduction_targets, plastic_use_reporting, plastic_waste_reporting, reduction_evidence_upstream, reduction_evidence_downstream];\n\n  redistributed_weights(weights, plastic_use_and_waste);\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(plastic_use_and_waste[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114420",
          "name": "reduction_qualitative_evidence"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114432",
          "name": "reduction_quantitative_evidence"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114444",
          "name": "reduction_targets"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114456",
          "name": "plastic_use_reporting"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114468",
          "name": "plastic_waste_reporting"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114480",
          "name": "reduction_evidence_upstream"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114492",
          "name": "reduction_evidence_downstream"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_Plastic_use_and_waste+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_Plastic_use_and_waste+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824723,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B12 Plastic use and waste+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_Plastic_use_and_waste+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B12 Plastic use and waste",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B12 Plastic use and waste in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Since the 1980s, plastic pollution is estimated to have increased tenfold (IPBES, 2018). Estimates suggest that global plastic production will double by 2050, of which approximately 8 million tonnes will end up as marine debris (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). The debris breaks into microplastics that are then ingested by marine organisms, leading to toxic effects on their feeding, growth and reproductive patterns. Due to plastic’s prolonged negative impact on ecosystems and biodiversity, this indicator focuses on reducing plastic use and waste from the private sector through globally applicable commitments and targets. </p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B12_Plastic_use_and_waste+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824728,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B13 Air pollutants",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_Air_pollutants.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B13 Air pollutants",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B13 Air pollutants in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The production of air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides and sulphur oxides, through companies’ operations and business activities, has adverse effects on the climate, habitats, biodiversity, agriculture, air quality and the health of both animals and humans (GRI, 2021). Moreover, the increase in certain air pollutants can disrupt the provision of ecosystem services, for example nutrient cycling and carbon cycling, but also water supply, on which planetary and human life depends. As such, this indicator measures companies’ approach to measuring and reducing harmful air pollutants across the value chain, including beyond national and international regulations. </p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B13 Air pollutants+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var air_pollutants, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2];\n\n  air_pollutants = [reduction_evidence, management_and_monitoring, pollutants_reporting, time_bound_targets, target_reporting];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(air_pollutants[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114504",
          "name": "reduction_evidence"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114516",
          "name": "management_and_monitoring"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114528",
          "name": "pollutants_reporting"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114540",
          "name": "time_bound_targets"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114552",
          "name": "target_reporting"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_Air_pollutants+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_Air_pollutants+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824737,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B13 Air pollutants+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_Air_pollutants+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B13 Air pollutants",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B13 Air pollutants in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>The production of air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides and sulphur oxides, through companies’ operations and business activities, has adverse effects on the climate, habitats, biodiversity, agriculture, air quality and the health of both animals and humans (GRI, 2021). Moreover, the increase in certain air pollutants can disrupt the provision of ecosystem services, for example nutrient cycling and carbon cycling, but also water supply, on which planetary and human life depends. As such, this indicator measures companies’ approach to measuring and reducing harmful air pollutants across the value chain, including beyond national and international regulations. </p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B13_Air_pollutants+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824742,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B14 Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B14_Scope_1_and_2_greenhouse_gas_emissions.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B14 Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B14 Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Biodiversity and climate change are heavily interlinked (CBD, 2009), with conversion and degradation of ecosystems leading to increases in GHG emissions. Subsequently, the effects of climate change are driving further biodiversity loss through increased risk of extinctions and extreme weather events. As such, this indicator focuses on companies’ emissions reductions in line with a 1.5- degree trajectory as recommended by the Paris Agreement. Furthermore, the indicator is aligned with the SBTi’s interim target to reduce value chain GHG emissions by 50% by 2030, in accordance with sectoral ambitions, and by 90-95% by 2050, in accordance with sectoral ambitions by 2030. </p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B14 Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scope_1_n_2_ghg_emissions, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25];\n\n  scope_1_n_2_ghg_emissions = [reductions, targets, targets_reporting, alignment];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(scope_1_n_2_ghg_emissions[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114564",
          "name": "reductions"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114576",
          "name": "targets"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114588",
          "name": "targets_reporting"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114600",
          "name": "alignment"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B14_Scope_1_and_2_greenhouse_gas_emissions+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B14_Scope_1_and_2_greenhouse_gas_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824751,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B14 Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B14_Scope_1_and_2_greenhouse_gas_emissions+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B14 Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B14 Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Biodiversity and climate change are heavily interlinked (CBD, 2009), with conversion and degradation of ecosystems leading to increases in GHG emissions. Subsequently, the effects of climate change are driving further biodiversity loss through increased risk of extinctions and extreme weather events. As such, this indicator focuses on companies’ emissions reductions in line with a 1.5- degree trajectory as recommended by the Paris Agreement. Furthermore, the indicator is aligned with the SBTi’s interim target to reduce value chain GHG emissions by 50% by 2030, in accordance with sectoral ambitions, and by 90-95% by 2050, in accordance with sectoral ambitions by 2030. </p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B14_Scope_1_and_2_greenhouse_gas_emissions+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824756,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B15 Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_Scope_3_greenhouse_gas_emissions.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B15 Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B15 Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Scope 3 emissions are often the largest segment of companies’ GHG, with business activities leading to a change in land use or degradation of ecosystems within companies’ value chains. Companies can reduce scope 3 emissions by influencing business partners across their value chains as well as through their purchases or products they sell. It is estimated that about 40% of the global GHG emissions are driven, or influenced, by companies through their purchases and the products they sell (CDP, 2018). This indicator therefore seeks to hold companies accountable for their scope 3 emissions and aligns with the SBTi’s guidance on the topic (SBTi, 2021).</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B15 Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scope_3_ghg_emissions, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2];\n\n  scope_3_ghg_emissions = [disclosure, reductions_disclosure, targets, targets_reporting, alignment];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(scope_3_ghg_emissions[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114612",
          "name": "disclosure"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114624",
          "name": "reductions_disclosure"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114636",
          "name": "targets"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114648",
          "name": "targets_reporting"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114660",
          "name": "alignment"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_Scope_3_greenhouse_gas_emissions+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_Scope_3_greenhouse_gas_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824765,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B15 Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_Scope_3_greenhouse_gas_emissions+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B15 Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B15 Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Scope 3 emissions are often the largest segment of companies’ GHG, with business activities leading to a change in land use or degradation of ecosystems within companies’ value chains. Companies can reduce scope 3 emissions by influencing business partners across their value chains as well as through their purchases or products they sell. It is estimated that about 40% of the global GHG emissions are driven, or influenced, by companies through their purchases and the products they sell (CDP, 2018). This indicator therefore seeks to hold companies accountable for their scope 3 emissions and aligns with the SBTi’s guidance on the topic (SBTi, 2021).</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B15_Scope_3_greenhouse_gas_emissions+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824770,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B16 Invasive alien species",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B16_Invasive_alien_species.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B16 Invasive alien species",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B16 Invasive alien species in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The accidental or voluntary introduction of IAS is one of the most common threats to species as well as a very important factor in ecosystems’ decline and deterioration. IAS can be defined as species introduced into a foreign environment which adversely impact local biodiversity through competition and predation, provoking the disruption of local ecosystems and ecosystem functions. The CBD’s Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework requires that the introduction of IAS be managed and the rate of their introduction and establishment be lessened by at least 50% (CBD, 2021).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B16 Invasive alien species+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var invasive_alien_spieces, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25];\n\n  invasive_alien_spieces = [introduction_risk, introduction_risk_in_value_chain, introduction_disclosure, introduction_prevention];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(invasive_alien_spieces[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114672",
          "name": "introduction_risk"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114684",
          "name": "introduction_risk_in_value_chain"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114696",
          "name": "introduction_disclosure"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114708",
          "name": "introduction_prevention"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B16_Invasive_alien_species+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B16_Invasive_alien_species+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824779,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.B16 Invasive alien species+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B16_Invasive_alien_species+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.B16 Invasive alien species",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.B16 Invasive alien species in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>The accidental or voluntary introduction of IAS is one of the most common threats to species as well as a very important factor in ecosystems’ decline and deterioration. IAS can be defined as species introduced into a foreign environment which adversely impact local biodiversity through competition and predation, provoking the disruption of local ecosystems and ecosystem functions. The CBD’s Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework requires that the introduction of IAS be managed and the rate of their introduction and establishment be lessened by at least 50% (CBD, 2021).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_B16_Invasive_alien_species+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824888,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Ecosystems and Biodiversity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Ecosystems and Biodiversity",
      "question": "What did the company score for Ecosystems and Biodiversity in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Conversion for Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Materiality Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Soil Contamination",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Monoculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18824430",
          "weight": 6.4516
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18824537",
          "weight": 6.4516
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18824584",
          "weight": 6.4516
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18824606",
          "weight": 6.4516
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18824620",
          "weight": 6.4516
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18824635",
          "weight": 3.226
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18824650",
          "weight": 6.4516
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18824665",
          "weight": 6.4516
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18824680",
          "weight": 6.4516
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18824695",
          "weight": 6.4516
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18824709",
          "weight": 6.4516
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18824723",
          "weight": 6.4516
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18824737",
          "weight": 6.4516
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18824751",
          "weight": 6.4516
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18824765",
          "weight": 6.4516
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18824779",
          "weight": 6.4516
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nature_Benchmark_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystems_and_Biodiversity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824923,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C01 Right to a safe, clean, healthy, and sustainable environment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_Right_to_a_safe_clean_healthy_and_sustainable_environment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C01 Right to a safe, clean, healthy, and sustainable environment",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C01 Right to a safe, clean, healthy, and sustainable environment in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The United Nations recently recognised access to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment as a universal human right (UN, 2021b). Business activities and infrastructure projects may expose local communities to increased environmental risks and adverse impacts, for example related to toxic materials or spread of diseases (IFC, 2012). At the same time, human rights defenders across the globe remain highly vulnerable and face violent and sometimes fatal assaults – in conjunction with increasing intimidation, harassment, stigmatisation and criminalisation. There is growing concern about the role of business in causing, contributing or being directly linked to attacks against human rights defenders, or in failing to take action against such attacks (UN, UNEP, 2021).</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C01 Right to a safe, clean, healthy, and sustainable environment+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var right_to_safe_environment, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2];\n\n  right_to_safe_environment = [commitment, impacts_identification, tracking_negative_impact, preventing_mitigating_remediating_negative_impact, commitment_to_safety];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(right_to_safe_environment[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114720",
          "name": "commitment"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114732",
          "name": "impacts_identification"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114744",
          "name": "tracking_negative_impact"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114756",
          "name": "preventing_mitigating_remediating_negative_impact"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114768",
          "name": "commitment_to_safety"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_Right_to_a_safe_clean_healthy_and_sustainable_environment+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_Right_to_a_safe_clean_healthy_and_sustainable_environment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824931,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C01 Right to a safe, clean, healthy, and sustainable environment+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_Right_to_a_safe_clean_healthy_and_sustainable_environment+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C01 Right to a safe, clean, healthy, and sustainable environment",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C01 Right to a safe, clean, healthy, and sustainable environment in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>The United Nations recently recognised access to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment as a universal human right (UN, 2021b). Business activities and infrastructure projects may expose local communities to increased environmental risks and adverse impacts, for example related to toxic materials or spread of diseases (IFC, 2012). At the same time, human rights defenders across the globe remain highly vulnerable and face violent and sometimes fatal assaults – in conjunction with increasing intimidation, harassment, stigmatisation and criminalisation. There is growing concern about the role of business in causing, contributing or being directly linked to attacks against human rights defenders, or in failing to take action against such attacks (UN, UNEP, 2021).</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_inclusion_and_community_impact.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C01_Right_to_a_safe_clean_healthy_and_sustainable_environment+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824936,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C02 Indigenous people' rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C02_Indigenous_people_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C02 Indigenous people' rights",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C02 Indigenous people' rights in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Indigenous peoples may be particularly vulnerable to the adverse impacts associated with project development, including risk of impoverishment and loss of identity, culture and natural resource-based livelihoods (IFC, 2012d). Protecting and securing Indigenous Peoples’ rights has been recognised as crucial to advancing conservation, restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies (WRI, 2019).</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C02 Indigenous people' rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var indigenous_peoples_rights, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25];\n\n  indigenous_peoples_rights = [commitment, impact_identification, requirements, practices];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(indigenous_peoples_rights[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114779",
          "name": "commitment"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114791",
          "name": "impact_identification"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114803",
          "name": "requirements"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114815",
          "name": "practices"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C02_Indigenous_people_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C02_Indigenous_people_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824945,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C02 Indigenous people' rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C02_Indigenous_people_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C02 Indigenous people' rights",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C02 Indigenous people' rights in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Indigenous peoples may be particularly vulnerable to the adverse impacts associated with project development, including risk of impoverishment and loss of identity, culture and natural resource-based livelihoods (IFC, 2012d). Protecting and securing Indigenous Peoples’ rights has been recognised as crucial to advancing conservation, restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies (WRI, 2019).</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_inclusion_and_community_impact.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C02_Indigenous_people_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824955,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C03 Land Rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C03_Land_Rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C03 Land Rights",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C03 Land Rights in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>When companies seek to acquire or lease land for their business activities, this can lead to relocation and loss of shelter or livelihoods for communities or individual households (IFC, 2012b). In countries where national governance and land administration are weak, local and indigenous communities are more exposed to rights violations and displacement (WRI, 2017).</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C03 Land Rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var land_rights, redistributed_weights, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  redistributed_weights = function(weights, values) {\n    var i, index, j, k, len, len1, num_of_weighted_values, redistributed_weight_value, value, weight;\n    num_of_weighted_values = weights.length;\n    for (index = j = 0, len = values.length; j < len; index = ++j) {\n      value = values[index];\n      if (value === \"Not Applicable\") {\n        num_of_weighted_values -= 1;\n        redistributed_weight_value = weights[index];\n        for (i = k = 0, len1 = weights.length; k < len1; i = ++k) {\n          weight = weights[i];\n          if (weight === 0) {\n            continue;\n          }\n          weights[i] = weight + redistributed_weight_value / num_of_weighted_values;\n        }\n        weights[index] = 0;\n      }\n    }\n    return weights;\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25];\n\n  land_rights = [commitment, acquisition_engagement, requirements, practices];\n\n  redistributed_weights(weights, land_rights);\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(land_rights[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114827",
          "name": "commitment"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114838",
          "name": "acquisition_engagement"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114849",
          "name": "requirements"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114860",
          "name": "practices"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C03_Land_Rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C03_Land_Rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824964,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C03 Land Rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C03_Land_Rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C03 Land Rights",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C03 Land Rights in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>When companies seek to acquire or lease land for their business activities, this can lead to relocation and loss of shelter or livelihoods for communities or individual households (IFC, 2012b). In countries where national governance and land administration are weak, local and indigenous communities are more exposed to rights violations and displacement (WRI, 2017).</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_inclusion_and_community_impact.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C03_Land_Rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18824998,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C04 Water and sanitation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C04_Water_and_sanitation.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C04 Water and sanitation",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C04 Water and sanitation in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Water scarcity affects more than 40% of people around the world – an alarming figure that is projected to increase due to climate change (UN, 2021). Water challenges include not only water scarcity but also pollution, flooding and access to drinking water and sanitation services. Companies are expected to adopt water stewardship practices that ensure water use and treatment are socially equitable and environmentally sustainable (UNGC, 2007).</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C04 Water and sanitation+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var score, water_n_sanitation, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25];\n\n  water_n_sanitation = [right_to_water, preventing_risks, requiring_business_partners_to_respect_right, improving_business_partner_practices];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(water_n_sanitation[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114871",
          "name": "right_to_water"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114883",
          "name": "preventing_risks"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114895",
          "name": "requiring_business_partners_to_respect_right"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114907",
          "name": "improving_business_partner_practices"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C04_Water_and_sanitation+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C04_Water_and_sanitation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825007,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C04 Water and sanitation+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C04_Water_and_sanitation+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C04 Water and sanitation",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C04 Water and sanitation in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Water scarcity affects more than 40% of people around the world – an alarming figure that is projected to increase due to climate change (UN, 2021). Water challenges include not only water scarcity but also pollution, flooding and access to drinking water and sanitation services. Companies are expected to adopt water stewardship practices that ensure water use and treatment are socially equitable and environmentally sustainable (UNGC, 2007).</p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_inclusion_and_community_impact.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C04_Water_and_sanitation+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825036,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Social inclusion and community impact",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_inclusion_and_community_impact.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Social inclusion and community impact",
      "question": "What did the company score for Social inclusion and community impact in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18824931",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18824945",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18824964",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825007",
          "weight": 25
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nature_Benchmark_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_inclusion_and_community_impact+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825057,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C05 Commitment to respect human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C05_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C05 Commitment to respect human rights",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C05 Commitment to respect human rights in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p><strong>A note on the scoring system</strong></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C05 Commitment to respect human rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (commitment === \"Yes\") {\n    10;\n  } else {\n    0;\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114919",
          "name": "commitment"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1588,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C05_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C05_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825066,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C05 Commitment to respect human rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C05_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C05 Commitment to respect human rights",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C05 Commitment to respect human rights in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1588,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C05_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825071,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C06 Commitment to respect the human rights of workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C06_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C06 Commitment to respect the human rights of workers",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C06 Commitment to respect the human rights of workers in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C06 Commitment to respect the human rights of workers+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var human_rights, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.5, 0.5];\n\n  human_rights = [commitment, partner_commitment];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(human_rights[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114931",
          "name": "commitment"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114943",
          "name": "partner_commitment"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1588,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C06_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C06_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825080,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C06 Commitment to respect the human rights of workers+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C06_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C06 Commitment to respect the human rights of workers",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C06 Commitment to respect the human rights of workers in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1588,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C06_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825085,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C07 Identifying human rights risk and impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C07_Identifying_human_rights_risk_and_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C07 Identifying human rights risk and impacts",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C07 Identifying human rights risk and impacts in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C07 Identifying human rights risk and impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var identifying_risks, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.5, 0.5];\n\n  identifying_risks = [identifying_risks_and_impacts, identifying_partner_risks_and_impacts];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(identifying_risks[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114955",
          "name": "identifying_risks_and_impacts"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114967",
          "name": "identifying_partner_risks_and_impacts"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1588,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C07_Identifying_human_rights_risk_and_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C07_Identifying_human_rights_risk_and_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825094,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C07 Identifying human rights risk and impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C07_Identifying_human_rights_risk_and_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C07 Identifying human rights risk and impacts",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C07 Identifying human rights risk and impacts in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1588,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C07_Identifying_human_rights_risk_and_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825099,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C08 Assessing human rights risks and impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C08_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C08 Assessing human rights risks and impacts",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C08 Assessing human rights risks and impacts in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C08 Assessing human rights risks and impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var assessing_human_rights_risks, redistributed_weights, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  redistributed_weights = function(weights, values) {\n    var i, index, j, k, len, len1, num_of_weighted_values, redistributed_weight_value, value, weight;\n    num_of_weighted_values = weights.length;\n    for (index = j = 0, len = values.length; j < len; index = ++j) {\n      value = values[index];\n      if (value === \"Not Applicable\") {\n        num_of_weighted_values -= 1;\n        redistributed_weight_value = weights[index];\n        for (i = k = 0, len1 = weights.length; k < len1; i = ++k) {\n          weight = weights[i];\n          if (weight === 0) {\n            continue;\n          }\n          weights[i] = weight + redistributed_weight_value / num_of_weighted_values;\n        }\n        weights[index] = 0;\n      }\n    }\n    return weights;\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.5, 0.5];\n\n  assessing_human_rights_risks = [processes, results];\n\n  redistributed_weights(weights, assessing_human_rights_risks);\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(assessing_human_rights_risks[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114979",
          "name": "processes"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114991",
          "name": "results"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C08_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C08_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825108,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C08 Assessing human rights risks and impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C08_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C08 Assessing human rights risks and impacts",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C08 Assessing human rights risks and impacts in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C08_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825113,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C09 Integrating and acting on human rights risk and impact assessments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C09_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risk_and_impact_assessments.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C09 Integrating and acting on human rights risk and impact assessments",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C09 Integrating and acting on human rights risk and impact assessments in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C09 Integrating and acting on human rights risk and impact assessments+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var integrating_and_acting_on_rights_risk, redistributed_weights, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else if (x === \"Partially\") {\n      return 5;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  redistributed_weights = function(weights, values) {\n    var i, index, j, k, len, len1, num_of_weighted_values, redistributed_weight_value, value, weight;\n    num_of_weighted_values = weights.length;\n    for (index = j = 0, len = values.length; j < len; index = ++j) {\n      value = values[index];\n      if (value === \"Not Applicable\") {\n        num_of_weighted_values -= 1;\n        redistributed_weight_value = weights[index];\n        for (i = k = 0, len1 = weights.length; k < len1; i = ++k) {\n          weight = weights[i];\n          if (weight === 0) {\n            continue;\n          }\n          weights[i] = weight + redistributed_weight_value / num_of_weighted_values;\n        }\n        weights[index] = 0;\n      }\n    }\n    return weights;\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.5, 0.5];\n\n  integrating_and_acting_on_rights_risk = [impact_assessments, specific_conclusions];\n\n  redistributed_weights(weights, integrating_and_acting_on_rights_risk);\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(integrating_and_acting_on_rights_risk[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115003",
          "name": "impact_assessments"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115015",
          "name": "specific_conclusions"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C09_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risk_and_impact_assessments+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C09_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risk_and_impact_assessments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825122,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C09 Integrating and acting on human rights risk and impact assessments+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C09_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risk_and_impact_assessments+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C09 Integrating and acting on human rights risk and impact assessments",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C09 Integrating and acting on human rights risk and impact assessments in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C09_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risk_and_impact_assessments+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825127,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C10 Engaging with affected and potentially affected stakeholders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C10_Engaging_with_affected_and_potentially_affected_stakeholders.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C10 Engaging with affected and potentially affected stakeholders",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C10 Engaging with affected and potentially affected stakeholders in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C10 Engaging with affected and potentially affected stakeholders+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var engaging_with_affected_and_potentially_affected_stakeholders, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.5, 0.5];\n\n  engaging_with_affected_and_potentially_affected_stakeholders = [engagement, examples];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(engaging_with_affected_and_potentially_affected_stakeholders[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115027",
          "name": "engagement"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115039",
          "name": "examples"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C10_Engaging_with_affected_and_potentially_affected_stakeholders+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C10_Engaging_with_affected_and_potentially_affected_stakeholders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825136,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C10 Engaging with affected and potentially affected stakeholders+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C10_Engaging_with_affected_and_potentially_affected_stakeholders+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C10 Engaging with affected and potentially affected stakeholders",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C10 Engaging with affected and potentially affected stakeholders in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C10_Engaging_with_affected_and_potentially_affected_stakeholders+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825148,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C11 Grievance mechanisms for workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C11_Grievance_mechanisms_for_workers.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C11 Grievance mechanisms for workers",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C11 Grievance mechanisms for workers in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C11 Grievance mechanisms for workers+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (grievance_mechanisms === \"Yes\") {\n    10;\n  } else {\n    0;\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115051",
          "name": "grievance_mechanisms"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C11_Grievance_mechanisms_for_workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C11_Grievance_mechanisms_for_workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825156,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C11 Grievance mechanisms for workers+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C11_Grievance_mechanisms_for_workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C11 Grievance mechanisms for workers",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C11 Grievance mechanisms for workers in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C11_Grievance_mechanisms_for_workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825161,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C12 Grievance Mechanisms for External Individuals and communities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C12_Grievance_Mechanisms_for_External_Individuals_and_communities.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C12 Grievance Mechanisms for External Individuals and communities",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C12 Grievance Mechanisms for External Individuals and communities in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C12 Grievance Mechanisms for External Individuals and communities+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (grievance_mechanisms_for_external_individuals === \"Yes\") {\n    10;\n  } else {\n    0;\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115063",
          "name": "grievance_mechanisms_for_external_individuals"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C12_Grievance_Mechanisms_for_External_Individuals_and_communities+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C12_Grievance_Mechanisms_for_External_Individuals_and_communities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825171,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C12 Grievance Mechanisms for External Individuals and communities+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C12_Grievance_Mechanisms_for_External_Individuals_and_communities+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C12 Grievance Mechanisms for External Individuals and communities",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C12 Grievance Mechanisms for External Individuals and communities in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C12_Grievance_Mechanisms_for_External_Individuals_and_communities+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825176,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C13 Health and safety fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C13_Health_and_safety_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C13 Health and safety fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C13 Health and safety fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C13 Health and safety fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var health_and_safety, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25];\n\n  health_and_safety = [commitment, quantitative, business_relationship_commitment, monitoring];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(health_and_safety[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115075",
          "name": "commitment"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115087",
          "name": "quantitative"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115099",
          "name": "business_relationship_commitment"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115111",
          "name": "monitoring"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C13_Health_and_safety_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C13_Health_and_safety_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825185,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C13 Health and safety fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C13_Health_and_safety_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C13 Health and safety fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C13 Health and safety fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C13_Health_and_safety_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825190,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C14 Living wage fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C14_Living_wage_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C14 Living wage fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C14 Living wage fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C14 Living wage fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var i, living_wage, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = (function() {\n    var j, results;\n    results = [];\n    for (i = j = 0; j < 3; i = ++j) {\n      results.push(1 / 3);\n    }\n    return results;\n  })();\n\n  living_wage = [targets, determination, business_relationship_support];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(living_wage[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115123",
          "name": "targets"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115134",
          "name": "determination"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115145",
          "name": "business_relationship_support"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C14_Living_wage_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C14_Living_wage_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825199,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C14 Living wage fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C14_Living_wage_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C14 Living wage fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C14 Living wage fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C14_Living_wage_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825204,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C15 Working hours fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C15_Working_hours_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C15 Working hours fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C15 Working hours fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C15 Working hours fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var i, score, weights, working_hours_fundamentals;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = (function() {\n    var j, results;\n    results = [];\n    for (i = j = 0; j < 3; i = ++j) {\n      results.push(1 / 3);\n    }\n    return results;\n  })();\n\n  working_hours_fundamentals = [commitment, fair_overtime_commitment, commitment_in_business_relationship_employees];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(working_hours_fundamentals[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115156",
          "name": "commitment"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115168",
          "name": "fair_overtime_commitment"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115180",
          "name": "commitment_in_business_relationship_employees"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C15_Working_hours_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C15_Working_hours_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825213,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C15 Working hours fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C15_Working_hours_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C15 Working hours fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C15 Working hours fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C15_Working_hours_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825329,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C16 Collective bargaining fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C16_Collective_bargaining_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C16 Collective bargaining fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C16 Collective bargaining fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C16 Collective bargaining fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var collective_bargaining_fundamentals, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.5, 0.5];\n\n  collective_bargaining_fundamentals = [collective_bargaining, collecting_bargaining_in_business_relationships];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(collective_bargaining_fundamentals[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115192",
          "name": "collective_bargaining"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115203",
          "name": "collecting_bargaining_in_business_relationships"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1588,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C16_Collective_bargaining_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C16_Collective_bargaining_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825338,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C16 Collective bargaining fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C16_Collective_bargaining_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C16 Collective bargaining fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C16 Collective bargaining fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1588,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C16_Collective_bargaining_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825343,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C17 Workforce diversity disclosure fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C17_Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C17 Workforce diversity disclosure fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C17 Workforce diversity disclosure fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+LGBT Inclusion",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Disability Inclusion"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C17 Workforce diversity disclosure fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var score, weights, workforce_diversity_disclosure;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25];\n\n  workforce_diversity_disclosure = [age, gender, race, other];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(workforce_diversity_disclosure[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115214",
          "name": "age"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115226",
          "name": "gender"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115238",
          "name": "race"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115250",
          "name": "other"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C17_Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C17_Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825352,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C17 Workforce diversity disclosure fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C17_Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C17 Workforce diversity disclosure fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C17 Workforce diversity disclosure fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+LGBT Inclusion",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Disability Inclusion"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C17_Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825357,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C18 Gender equality and women's empowerment fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C18_Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C18 Gender equality and women's empowerment fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C18 Gender equality and women's empowerment fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C18 Gender equality and women's empowerment fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var gender_equality, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25];\n\n  gender_equality = [commitment, targets, gte_30_prercent_women_on_givernance, gender_pay_ratio];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(gender_equality[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115262",
          "name": "commitment"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115274",
          "name": "targets"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115286",
          "name": "gte_30_prercent_women_on_givernance"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115298",
          "name": "gender_pay_ratio"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C18_Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C18_Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825366,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C18 Gender equality and women's empowerment fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C18_Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C18 Gender equality and women's empowerment fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C18 Gender equality and women's empowerment fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C18_Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825371,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C19 Personal data protection fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C19_Personal_data_protection_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C19 Personal data protection fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C19 Personal data protection fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C19 Personal data protection fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var personal_data_protection, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.5, 0.5];\n\n  personal_data_protection = [commitment, policy];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(personal_data_protection[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115310",
          "name": "commitment"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115321",
          "name": "policy"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1588,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C19_Personal_data_protection_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C19_Personal_data_protection_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825380,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C19 Personal data protection fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C19_Personal_data_protection_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C19 Personal data protection fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C19 Personal data protection fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1588,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C19_Personal_data_protection_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825385,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C20 Responsible tax fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C20_Responsible_tax_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C20 Responsible tax fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C20 Responsible tax fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Country-by-Country Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C20 Responsible tax fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var i, responsible_tax, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = (function() {\n    var j, results;\n    results = [];\n    for (i = j = 0; j < 3; i = ++j) {\n      results.push(1 / 3);\n    }\n    return results;\n  })();\n\n  responsible_tax = [strategy, strategy_accountability, income_tax_disclosure];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(responsible_tax[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115332",
          "name": "strategy"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115344",
          "name": "strategy_accountability"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115356",
          "name": "income_tax_disclosure"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1588,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C20_Responsible_tax_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C20_Responsible_tax_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825394,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C20 Responsible tax fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C20_Responsible_tax_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C20 Responsible tax fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C20 Responsible tax fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Country-by-Country Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1588,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C20_Responsible_tax_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825399,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C21 Anti-bribery and anti-corruption fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C21_Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C21 Anti-bribery and anti-corruption fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C21 Anti-bribery and anti-corruption fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C21 Anti-bribery and anti-corruption fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var anti_bribery_anti_corruption, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25];\n\n  anti_bribery_anti_corruption = [policy, process, in_contractual_agreements, compaint_mechanism];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(anti_bribery_anti_corruption[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115368",
          "name": "policy"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115380",
          "name": "process"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115392",
          "name": "in_contractual_agreements"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115404",
          "name": "compaint_mechanism"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1588,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C21_Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C21_Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825408,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C21 Anti-bribery and anti-corruption fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C21_Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C21 Anti-bribery and anti-corruption fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C21 Anti-bribery and anti-corruption fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1588,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C21_Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825413,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C22 Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C22_Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C22 Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C22 Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-10",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C22 Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var responsible_lobbying, score, weights;\n\n  score = function(x) {\n    if (x === \"Yes\") {\n      return 10;\n    } else {\n      return 0;\n    }\n  };\n\n  weights = [0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25];\n\n  responsible_lobbying = [policy, political_contributions_policy, lobbying_expenditures, third_party_political_lobbying];\n\n  weights.reduce(function(weighted_sum, weight, index) {\n    return weighted_sum + weight * score(responsible_lobbying[index]);\n  }, 0);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115416",
          "name": "policy"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115428",
          "name": "political_contributions_policy"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115439",
          "name": "lobbying_expenditures"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115451",
          "name": "third_party_political_lobbying"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C22_Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C22_Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825422,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+NAT.C22 Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C22_Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "NAT.C22 Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals",
      "question": "What did the company score for NAT.C22 Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>WBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate, based on publicly available information, in order to drive transparency about responsible business conduct. The core social indicators are supplemented by transformation-specific social indicators that are relevant to the sectors being assessed (see also Section C – Social inclusion and community impact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+NAT_C22_Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825427,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Core Social Indicators",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Core Social Indicators",
      "question": "What did the company score for the Core Social Indicators in the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>A note on the scoring system</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Wikirate uses a standardized 10-point scoring system to enable comparison of company scores across different benchmarks. In the Nature Benchmark, companies can earn 1 point per indicator, which are then added together and calculated as a percentage of the total score for a measurement area (MA) to determine the final score for the MA. The overall Wikirate score is calculated by combining these scores with the appropriate weightings, and converting them to a 10-point scale. For instance, if a company achieves a final score of 50, the corresponding Rating will be 5.</p><p></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+LGBT Inclusion",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Disability Inclusion",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Country-by-Country Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18825066",
          "weight": 5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825080",
          "weight": 5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825094",
          "weight": 5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825108",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825122",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825136",
          "weight": 5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825156",
          "weight": 5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825171",
          "weight": 5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825185",
          "weight": 5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825199",
          "weight": 5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825213",
          "weight": 5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825338",
          "weight": 5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825352",
          "weight": 5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825366",
          "weight": 5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825380",
          "weight": 5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825394",
          "weight": 5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825408",
          "weight": 5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825422",
          "weight": 5
        }
      ],
      "answer": 895,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nature_Benchmark_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Core_Social_Indicators+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18825432,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Nature Benchmark Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nature_Benchmark_Score.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Nature Benchmark Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve on the Nature Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>The Nature Benchmark tracks and measures how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems. The level of action and progress these large businesses make will directly affect whether we achieve the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework.</p>\r\n<hr>\r\n<p>Suggested attribution:</p>\r\n<p><a target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, '<a href=\"/~18825432\" target=\"_blank\">Nature Benchmark Score</a>' by <a href=\"/~8080274\" target=\"_blank\">World Benchmarking Alliance</a>, licensed under <a href=\"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0\" target=\"_blank\">CC BY 4.0</a></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Materiality Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Impact Assessment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Habitat Protection",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Nature-based Solutions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity Agreements",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Conversion for Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Forestry",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Lifecycle Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Soil Contamination",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Monoculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wastewater Discharge",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Hazardous Waste",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Product Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Waste Management & Disposal Practices",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Products",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Air Pollution",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+LGBT Inclusion",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Disability Inclusion",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Country-by-Country Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18823662",
          "weight": 13.6
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18824888",
          "weight": 52.7
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825036",
          "weight": 13.6
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18825427",
          "weight": 20
        }
      ],
      "answer": 817,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 814,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nature_Benchmark_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18827714,
      "name": "Fair Wear Foundation+Fair Wear Foundation Category",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fair_Wear_Foundation+Fair_Wear_Foundation_Category.json",
      "designer": "Fair Wear Foundation",
      "title": "Fair Wear Foundation Category",
      "question": "What category did the brand achieve in the Fair Wear Foundation annual Brand Performance Check? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Fair Wear Foundation works with brands and industry influencers to improve working conditions in the clothing industry. </p>\r\n<p>When companies join Fair Wear Foundation, they commit to implementing the FWF Code of Labour Practices in their supply chains. During the annual Performance Check, FWF assesses whether brands meet the requirements that follow from this commitment and categorises them according to their performance.</p>\r\n<p>The categories are as follows:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Leader</strong>: This category is for member companies who score exceptionally well and operate on an advanced level. Leaders have made substantial progress in embedding and implementing human rights due diligence, especially strong risk assessments and remediation strategies. Leaders demonstrate responsible purchasing practices and demonstrate best practices in complex areas such as living wages and freedom of association. They also continuously review their internal processes and supply chain, regularly making improvements and adjustments.</li>\r\n<li><strong>Good</strong>: Member companies who are making a serious effort to implement the Code of Labour Practices (CoLP) are ‘doing good,’ and their efforts deserve to be recognised as such. They have set up strong systems and policies and are well underway in implementing responsible purchasing practices. Member companies within the Good category are progressing towards meeting all Fair Wear membership requirements and engage in remediation efforts. Most member companies receive a Good rating.</li>\r\n<li><strong>Needs Improvement</strong>: Member companies are most likely to find themselves in this category when problems arise that prevent them from implementing steps required to fulfil Fair Wear membership requirements or if they have not been able to demonstrate sufficient evidence of improvement during the annual performance check. Member companies can only be placed in this category for one year, after which they need to earn a Good rating or face demotion to Suspended.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Source: [[https://www.fairwear.org/join-the-movement/brand-performance-check/|Fair Wear Foundation]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Check the [[https://www.fairwear.org/brands/|Fair Wear Foundation member list]] for the company you are researching. Select the category the brand has achieved: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Leader</li>\r\n<li>Good</li>\r\n<li>Needs Improvement</li>\r\n<li>Suspended</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Leader",
        "Good",
        "Needs Improvement",
        "Suspended"
      ],
      "report_type": "Member List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Investment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 87,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 87,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fair_Wear_Foundation+Fair_Wear_Foundation_Category+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18830648,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.1.S1 Commitment to respect human rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_1_S1_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.1.S1 Commitment to respect human rights",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_1_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_1_S1_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18830652,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.1.S2 Commitment to respect human rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_1_S2_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.1.S2 Commitment to respect human rights",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_1_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_1_S2_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18830657,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.1 Commitment to respect human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_1_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.1 Commitment to respect human rights",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18830648",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18830652",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_A_1_Policy_commitments.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_1_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18830808,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.2.a.S1 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights\nat Work+Vasiliki Gkatziaki",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_S1_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.2.a.S1 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights\nat Work",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Commitment to ILO core principles\":\"5\",\"Explicitly lists all four ILO core principles\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_S2_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders_Categorical.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_S1_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders_Categorical.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_S1_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_S1_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18831481,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.2.a.S2 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights\nat Work+Vasiliki Gkatziaki",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_S2_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.2.a.S2 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights\nat Work",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Expects suppliers to commit to ILO core principles\":\"5\",\"Explicitly lists all four ILO core principles for suppliers\":\"5\",\"Expects BPs/JVs to commit to ILO core principles\":\"5\",\"Explicitly lists all four ILO core principles for BPs/JVs\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_S2_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18831998,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.2.a Commitment to respect the human rights of workers: ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.2.a Commitment to respect the human rights of workers: ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18830808",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19021900",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_S1_Training_on_human_rights_Cetegorical.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_S2_Training_on_human_rights_Categorical.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_S1_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions_Categorical.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_S2_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions_Categorical.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832015,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.2.a.S2 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_S2_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.2.a.S2 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfill all the requirements on CHRB A.1.2.a.S2 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.2.a.S2 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Categorical)+Vasiliki Gkatziaki"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var accepted_options_1, accepted_options_2, all,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_options_1 = [\"Expects BPs/JVs to commit to ILO core principles\", \"Explicitly lists all four ILO core principles for BPs/JVs\"];\n\n  accepted_options_2 = [\"Explicitly lists all four ILO core principles for suppliers\", \"Expects suppliers to commit to ILO core principles\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_a12as2, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (all(accepted_options_1, CHRB_a12as2) || all(accepted_options_2, CHRB_a12as2)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18021878",
          "name": "CHRB_a12as2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_S2_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work_Categorical+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_S2_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832070,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.2.b.S1 Health and safety and working hours+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_b_S1_Health_and_safety_and_working_hours+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.2.b.S1 Health and safety and working hours",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Commitment to respect H&S of workers\":\"5\",\"Commitment to ILO working hours standards or 48-hour regular work week\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_b_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers_Health_and_safety_and_working_hours.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_b_S1_Health_and_safety_and_working_hours+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832074,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.2.b.S2 Health and safety and working hours+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_b_S2_Health_and_safety_and_working_hours+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.2.b.S2 Health and safety and working hours",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Expects suppliers to commit to H&S of workers\":\"5\",\"Expects suppliers to commit to ILO working hours standards or 48 hour regular work week\":\"5\",\"Expects BPs/JVs to commit to H&S of workers\":\"5\",\"Expects BPs/JVs to commit to ILO working hours standards or 48 hour regular work week\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_b_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers_Health_and_safety_and_working_hours.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_b_S2_Health_and_safety_and_working_hours+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832079,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.2.b Commitment to respect the human rights of workers: Health and safety and working hours",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_b_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers_Health_and_safety_and_working_hours.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.2.b Commitment to respect the human rights of workers: Health and safety and working hours",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18832074",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18832070",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_b_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers_Health_and_safety_and_working_hours+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832084,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.EX.a.S1 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_a_S1_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.EX.a.S1 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfill all the requirements on CHRB A.1.3.EX.a.S1 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Partially"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.EX.a.S1 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  if (indexOf.call(land_resources_people_EX, 'None of the above') >= 0) {\n    'No';\n  } else if (land_resources_people_EX.length === 3) {\n    'Yes';\n  } else {\n    'Partially';\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18021989",
          "name": "land_resources_people_EX"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_a_S1_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_a_S1_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832094,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.EX.a.S1 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_a_S1_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.EX.a.S1 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Partially\":\"5\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_a_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Extractives_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_a_S1_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832099,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.EX.a.S2 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_a_S2_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.EX.a.S2 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfill all the requirements on CHRB A.1.3.EX.a.S2 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Partially"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.EX.a.S2 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  if (indexOf.call(land_resources_people_EX_2, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (land_resources_people_EX_2.length === 3) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022001",
          "name": "land_resources_people_EX_2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_a_S2_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_a_S2_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832109,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.EX.a.S2 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_a_S2_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.EX.a.S2 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Partially\":\"5\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_a_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Extractives_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_a_S2_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832115,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.a Commitment to respect human rights particularly relevant to the sector: Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples' rights (Extractives sector)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_a_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Extractives_sector.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.a Commitment to respect human rights particularly relevant to the sector: Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples' rights (Extractives sector)",
      "question": "What does the company score to public commitments to respecting, and ensures its business relationships respect, the human rights of particular relevance to communities' livelihoods and health, including the right to water and the ownership or use of land and natural resources.",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18832094",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18832109",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_a_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Extractives_sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832120,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.EX.b.S1 Security+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_b_S1_Security+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.EX.b.S1 Security",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Commitment to Voluntary Principles on Security and HRs OR Uses only ICoCA members as security providers\":\"5\",\"Commits to International Humanitarian Law\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_b_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Security_Extractives_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_b_S1_Security+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832128,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.EX.b.S2 Security+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_b_S2_Security+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.EX.b.S2 Security",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_b_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Security_Extractives_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_EX_b_S2_Security+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832142,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.b Commitment to respect human rights particularly relevant to the sector: Security (Extractives sector)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_b_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Security_Extractives_sector.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.b Commitment to respect human rights particularly relevant to the sector: Security (Extractives sector)",
      "question": "What does the company score on public commitments to respecting, and ensures that its business relationships respect, the human rights of particular relevance to communities’ livelihoods, security and health, including fundamental humanitarian norms such as protections for civilians and other protected persons when operating in conflict-affected areas.",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18832120",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18832128",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_b_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Security_Extractives_sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832221,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.4.S2 Commitment to remedy+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_4_S2_Commitment_to_remedy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.4.S2 Commitment to remedy",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Commitment to collaborate with judicial or non-judicial mechanisms\":\"5\",\"Commitment to work with suppliers on remedy\":\"5\",\"Commitment to work with EX BPs on remedy\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_4_Commitment_to_remedy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_4_S2_Commitment_to_remedy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832225,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.4.S1 Commitment to remedy+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_4_S1_Commitment_to_remedy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.4.S1 Commitment to remedy",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Commitment to remedy adverse HRs impacts\":\"5\",\"Expects suppliers to make this commitment\":\"5\",\"Expects EX BPs to make this commitments\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_4_Commitment_to_remedy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_4_S1_Commitment_to_remedy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832230,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.4 Commitment to remedy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_4_Commitment_to_remedy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.4 Commitment to remedy",
      "question": "What does the company score on public commitments to providing for or cooperating in remediation for affected individuals and workers and communities through legitimate processes (including judicial and non-judicial mechanisms, as appropriate), where it identifies that it has caused or contributed to adverse impacts",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18832221",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18832225",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_A_1_Policy_commitments.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_4_Commitment_to_remedy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832235,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.5.S1 Commitment to respect the rights of human rights defenders+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_5_S1_Commitment_to_respect_the_rights_of_human_rights_defenders+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.5.S1 Commitment to respect the rights of human rights defenders",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Zero tolerance of threats/attacks on HRDs\":\"5\",\"Expects suppliers to make this commitment\":\"5\",\"Expects BPs to make this commitment\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_5_Commitment_to_respect_the_rights_of_human_rights_defenders.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_5_S1_Commitment_to_respect_the_rights_of_human_rights_defenders+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832239,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.5.S2 Commitment to respect the rights of human rights defenders+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_5_S2_Commitment_to_respect_the_rights_of_human_rights_defenders+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.5.S2 Commitment to respect the rights of human rights defenders",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_5_Commitment_to_respect_the_rights_of_human_rights_defenders.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_5_S2_Commitment_to_respect_the_rights_of_human_rights_defenders+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832244,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.5 Commitment to respect the rights of human rights defenders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_5_Commitment_to_respect_the_rights_of_human_rights_defenders.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.5 Commitment to respect the rights of human rights defenders",
      "question": "What does the company score on public commitments to not tolerating threats, intimidation, violence, punitive action, surveillance or physical or legal attacks against human rights defenders, including those exercising their rights to freedom of expression, association, peaceful assembly and protest against the business or its operations. It also places equivalent expectations on its business relationships and commitments to engaging with human rights defenders as part of operational processes of risk assessment and due diligence or supporting the work of human rights defenders to create a safe and enabling environment for the work of civil society in locations where it operates, at both local and national levels. (see also indicator C.5)",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18832235",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18832239",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_A_1_Policy_commitments.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_5_Commitment_to_respect_the_rights_of_human_rights_defenders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832253,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.1.S1 Commitment from the top+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_1_S1_Commitment_from_the_top+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.1.S1 Commitment from the top",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Board level responsibility for HRs\":\"5\",\"Describes HRs expertise of Board member\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_1_Board_level_accountability_Commitment_from_the_top.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_1_S1_Commitment_from_the_top+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832257,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.1.S2 Commitment from the top+Vasiliki Gkatziaki",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_1_S2_Commitment_from_the_top+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.1.S2 Commitment from the top",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_1_Board_level_accountability_Commitment_from_the_top.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_1_S2_Commitment_from_the_top+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832262,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.1 Board level accountability: Commitment from the top",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_1_Board_level_accountability_Commitment_from_the_top.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.1 Board level accountability: Commitment from the top",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18832253",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18832257",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_A_2_Board_level_accountability.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_1_Board_level_accountability_Commitment_from_the_top+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832266,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.2.S1 Board responsibility+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_2_S1_Board_responsibility+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.2.S1 Board responsibility",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_2_Board_level_accountability_Board_responsibility.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_2_S1_Board_responsibility+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832270,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.2.S2 Board responsibility+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_2_S2_Board_responsibility+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.2.S2 Board responsibility",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Meets both requirements under score 1\":\"5\",\"Describes how affected stakeholders / HRs experts inform board discussions\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_2_Board_level_accountability_Board_responsibility.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_2_S2_Board_responsibility+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832275,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.2 Board level accountability: Board responsibility",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_2_Board_level_accountability_Board_responsibility.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.2 Board level accountability: Board responsibility",
      "question": "What does the company scores on processes in place at board level to discuss and address human rights issues and how they fit within the company’s overall purpose and strategy, or a board committee regularly reviews the company’s strategy, policy and management processes, as well as challenges and progress in managing human rights issues and provides examples of what was discussed",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18832266",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18832270",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_A_2_Board_level_accountability.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_2_Board_level_accountability_Board_responsibility+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832284,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.3.S1 Incentives and performance management+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_3_S1_Incentives_and_performance_management+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.3.S1 Incentives and performance management",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"At least one board member incentive linked to HRs commitments\":\"5\",\"Incentive scheme linked to key HRs risks beyond employee H&S\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_3_Board_level_accountability_Incentives_and_performance_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_3_S1_Incentives_and_performance_management+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832292,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.3.S2 Incentives and performance management+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_3_S2_Incentives_and_performance_management+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.3.S2 Incentives and performance management",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Performance criteria linked to HRs made public\":\"5\",\"Review of other board incentives for coherence with HRs policies\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_3_Board_level_accountability_Incentives_and_performance_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_3_S2_Incentives_and_performance_management+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832297,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.3 Board level accountability: Incentives and performance management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_3_Board_level_accountability_Incentives_and_performance_management.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.3 Board level accountability: Incentives and performance management",
      "question": "What does the company scores on incentives to the board linked to the implementation of its human rights policy commitments or targets and ensure to coherence with its human rights policy commitments",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18832284",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18832292",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_A_2_Board_level_accountability.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_3_Board_level_accountability_Incentives_and_performance_management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832302,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.4.S1 Business model strategy and risks+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_4_S1_Business_model_strategy_and_risks+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.4.S1 Business model strategy and risks",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_4_Board_level_accountability_Business_model_strategy_and_risks.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_4_S1_Business_model_strategy_and_risks+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832306,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.4.S2 Business model strategy and risks+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_4_S2_Business_model_strategy_and_risks+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.4.S2 Business model strategy and risks",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Meets both requirements under score 1\":\"5\",\"Example of actions resulting from reviews\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_4_Board_level_accountability_Business_model_strategy_and_risks.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_4_S2_Business_model_strategy_and_risks+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832311,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.2.4 Board level accountability: Business model strategy and risks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_4_Board_level_accountability_Business_model_strategy_and_risks.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.2.4 Board level accountability: Business model strategy and risks",
      "question": "What does the company score on addressing the impacts of its strategy and business model on the human rights of affected stakeholders at board level",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18832302",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18832306",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_A_2_Board_level_accountability.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_2_4_Board_level_accountability_Business_model_strategy_and_risks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832317,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB Theme A.2 - Board level accountability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_A_2_Board_level_accountability.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB Theme A.2 - Board level accountability",
      "question": "What the company score on indicators that seek to assess how the company's policy commitments are managed as part of the board's role and responsibility",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18832262",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18832275",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18832297",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18832311",
          "weight": 25
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_A_Governance_and_policy_commitments.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_A_2_Board_level_accountability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832916,
      "name": "Aureliane Frohlich+German Supply Chain Act: Risks identified (own operations and tier 1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aureliane_Frohlich+German_Supply_Chain_Act_Risks_identified_own_operations_and_tier_1.json",
      "designer": "Aureliane Frohlich",
      "title": "German Supply Chain Act: Risks identified (own operations and tier 1)",
      "question": "Which types of risks has the company identifies in their own operations and tier 1 suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Find the answer to this question in the company's report published under the German Supply Chain Act (Bericht zum LksG).</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The results of the risk analysis can be found in section B1. of the Bericht zum LksG,. </p>\r\n<p>Select the relevant types of risks identified by the company.</p>\r\n<p>- Modern slavery: if the company identified risk of child or forced labour, debt bondage, etc.</p>\r\n<p>- Health and Safety: threats to workers' health</p>\r\n<p>- Discrimination: gender or other types of discrimination</p>\r\n<p>- Environmental degradation: any risks related to environmental protection and pollution</p>\r\n<p>- Land grabbing: risks of illegal taking of land - Wages: any risk linked to the failure to ensure fair/living wages or delayed payment of wages</p>\r\n<p>- Other labour rights issues: risks linked to recruitment practices, contracts, working hours.</p>\r\n<p>- Other human rights issues: for example, risks to human rights defenders, gender violence, etc.</p>\r\n<p>- No: the company does not identify any risk</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Modern slavery (e.g. forced labour)",
        "Health and Safety of workers",
        "Discrimination and equal opportunities",
        "Environmental degradation",
        "Land grabbing",
        "Wages (living wages and payments)",
        "Other labour rights",
        "Other human rights issues",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "German Supply Chain Act report (Bericht zum LksG)",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aureliane_Frohlich+German_Supply_Chain_Act_Risks_identified_own_operations_and_tier_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832928,
      "name": "Aureliane+German Supply Chain Act: Identified violations (own operations and tier 1)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aureliane+German_Supply_Chain_Act_Identified_violations_own_operations_and_tier_1.json",
      "designer": "Aureliane",
      "title": "German Supply Chain Act: Identified violations (own operations and tier 1)",
      "question": "Which types of violations has the company identified in their own operations and direct suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Find the answer to this question in the company's report published under the German Supply Chain Act (Bericht zum LksG).</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Section C1 and C2 of the Bericht zum LksG.</strong></p>\r\n<p>Select the relevant types of violations identified by the company in their own operations and in their direct suppliers:</p>\r\n<p>- Modern slavery: if the company identified cases of child or forced labour, debt bondage, etc.</p>\r\n<p>- Health and Safety: failures to ensure workers' health and safety</p>\r\n<p>- Discrimination: gender or other types of discrimination</p>\r\n<p>- Environmental degradation: violations related to environmental protection and pollution</p>\r\n<p>- Land grabbing: illegal taking of land - Wages: failure to ensure fair/living wages or delayed payment of wages</p>\r\n<p>- Wages (living wages and payments): for any violation linked to low wages, etc. </p>\r\n<p>- Other labour rights issues: failure to ensure recruitment practices, contracts, working hours.</p>\r\n<p>- Other human rights issues: cases of violence against defenders, gender violence, etc.</p>\r\n<p>- No: the company does not identify any violation</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Modern slavery (e.g. forced labour)",
        "Health and Safety of workers",
        "Discrimination and equal opportunities",
        "Environmental degradation",
        "Land grabbing",
        "Wages (living wages and payments)",
        "Other labour rights",
        "Other human rights issues",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "German Supply Chain Act report (Bericht zum LksG)",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aureliane+German_Supply_Chain_Act_Identified_violations_own_operations_and_tier_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832939,
      "name": "Aureliane+German Supply Chain Act: Risks identified in indirect suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aureliane+German_Supply_Chain_Act_Risks_identified_in_indirect_suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Aureliane",
      "title": "German Supply Chain Act: Risks identified in indirect suppliers",
      "question": "Which types of risks has the company identified in their indirect suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Find the answer to this question in the company's report published under the German Supply Chain Act (Bericht zum LksG).</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric captures whether companies report risks in their indirect supply chain. You will find the answer in section B.1 of the LksG report. </p>\r\n<p>Select the relevant types of risks identified by the company.</p>\r\n<p>- Modern slavery: if the company identified risk of child or forced labour, debt bondage, etc.</p>\r\n<p>- Health and Safety: threats to workers' health</p>\r\n<p>- Descrimination: gender or other types of discrimination</p>\r\n<p>- Environmental degradation: any risks related to environmental protection and pollution</p>\r\n<p>- Land grabbing: risks of illegal taking of land</p>\r\n<p>- Wages: any risk linked to the failure to ensure fair/living wages or delayed payment of wages</p>\r\n<p>- Other labour rights issues: risks linked to recruitment practices, contracts, working hours.</p>\r\n<p>- Other human rights issues: for example, risks to human rights defenders, gender violence, etc.</p>\r\n<p>- No: the company does not identify any risk</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Modern slavery (e.g. forced labour)",
        "Health and Safety of workers",
        "Discrimination and equal opportunities",
        "Environmental degradation",
        "Land grabbing",
        "Wages (living wages and payments)",
        "Other labour rights",
        "Other human rights issues",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "German Supply Chain Act report (Bericht zum LksG)",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aureliane+German_Supply_Chain_Act_Risks_identified_in_indirect_suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832951,
      "name": "Aureliane+German Supply Chain Act: Violations identified in indirect suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aureliane+German_Supply_Chain_Act_Violations_identified_in_indirect_suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Aureliane",
      "title": "German Supply Chain Act: Violations identified in indirect suppliers",
      "question": "Which types of violations has the company identified in their indirect suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Find the answer to this question in the company's report published under the German Supply Chain Act (Bericht zum LksG).</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Violations in indirect suppliers are reported in <strong>section C.3.</strong></p>\r\n<p>Select the relevant types of violations identified by the company in their own operations and in their direct suppliers:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>- Modern slavery: if the company identified cases of child or forced labour, debt bondage, etc.</li>\r\n<li>- Health and Safety: failures to ensure workers' health and safety</li>\r\n<li>- Discrimination: gender or other types of discrimination</li>\r\n<li>- Environmental degradation: violations related to environmental protection and pollution</li>\r\n<li>- Land grabbing: illegal taking of land - Wages: failure to ensure fair/living wages or delayed payment of wages</li>\r\n<li>- Wages (living wages and payments): for any violation linked to low wages, etc. </li>\r\n<li>- Other labour rights issues: failure to ensure recruitment practices, contracts, working hours.</li>\r\n<li>- Other human rights issues: cases of violence against defenders, gender violence, etc.</li>\r\n<li>- No: the company does not identify any violation</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Modern slavery (e.g. forced labour)",
        "Health and Safety of workers",
        "Discrimination and equal opportunities",
        "Environmental degradation",
        "Land grabbing",
        "Wages (living wages and payments)",
        "Other labour rights",
        "Other human rights issues",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "German Supply Chain Act report (Bericht zum LksG)",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aureliane+German_Supply_Chain_Act_Violations_identified_in_indirect_suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832963,
      "name": "Aureliane+German Supply Chain Act: Remediation measures implemented (all tiers)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aureliane+German_Supply_Chain_Act_Remediation_measures_implemented_all_tiers.json",
      "designer": "Aureliane",
      "title": "German Supply Chain Act: Remediation measures implemented (all tiers)",
      "question": "Does the report describe remediation measures implemented in response to cases of human rights violation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Find the answer to this question in the company's report published under the German Supply Chain Act (Bericht zum LksG).</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Remediation measures are described in<strong> section C</strong> of the reports.</p>\r\n<p>This metric captures whether companies report on the remediation measures they have implemented in response to cases of human rights abuses in their supply chains, and which type of measures were implemented.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Only measures that have been implemented are taken into account for this metric.</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>If the company specifies that the remediation is available for individual workers affected, such as backpayment of wages or support to pursue a claim, please select the “<strong>Worker remediation</strong>” value.</li>\r\n<li>If the company specifies that senior management will be informed if instances of human rights violations have been identified, please select the “<strong>Senior managemen</strong>t” value. Note: Reports to an authority, only counts if it is clear the authority is from Senior Management.</li>\r\n<li>If the company supports the supplier to respond to instances of violations, please select the “<strong>Corrective action plan</strong>” value.</li>\r\n<li>If the company identifies punitive action, by canceling the contracts of suppliers, please select the “<strong>Cancel contracts</strong>” value. Note: Also select this option if the company mentions it didn't cancel any contracts.</li>\r\n<li>If the company mentions it conducted remediation but does not provide any details about the nature of the measures or processes, select \"<strong>Remediation is mentioned but no details of the processes or measures</strong>\".</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Senior Management",
        "Worker Remediation",
        "Corrective action plans",
        "Cancel contracts",
        "Remediation is mentioned but no details of the processes or measures",
        "No remediation measures were implemented"
      ],
      "report_type": "German Supply Chain Act report (Bericht zum LksG)",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aureliane+German_Supply_Chain_Act_Remediation_measures_implemented_all_tiers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18832975,
      "name": "Aureliane+German Supply Chain Act: Preventive measures implemented (all tiers)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Aureliane+German_Supply_Chain_Act_Preventive_measures_implemented_all_tiers.json",
      "designer": "Aureliane",
      "title": "German Supply Chain Act: Preventive measures implemented (all tiers)",
      "question": "Does the company describe preventive measures implemented in response to identified risks?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Find the answer to this question in the company's report published under the German Supply Chain Act (Bericht zum LksG).</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric captures whether companies report on the preventive measures they have implemented in response to risks of human rights abuses in their supply chains. Please make sure to leave a comment that reflects the type of measures the company has taken.</p>\r\n<p>You will find the answer in s<span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">ection B.2-B.4 of the Bericht zum LksG.</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "German Supply Chain Act report (Bericht zum LksG)",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 20,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 20,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Aureliane+German_Supply_Chain_Act_Preventive_measures_implemented_all_tiers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18991398,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB Theme A.1 - Policy commitments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_A_1_Policy_commitments.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB Theme A.1 - Policy commitments",
      "question": "What the company scores on public commitments to respecting all internationally recognised human rights across its activities?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>A policy commitment is a statement approved at the highest levels of the business that shows the company is committed to respecting human rights and communicates this internally and externally. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> The term \"statement\" is used to describe a wide range of forms a company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities, commitments, and expectations – this may be a separate human rights policy or human rights commitments within other formal policies, or provisions within other documents that govern the company’s approach such as a company code, business principles, etc.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>These sub-themes A1 is broken down into the following indicators:</p>\r\n<p><strong>A.1.1 Commitment to respect human rights</strong></p>\r\n<p><strong>A.1.2 Commitment to respect the human rights of workers</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">A.1.2.a ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">A.1.2.b Health and safety and working hours</p>\r\n<p><strong>A.1.3 Commitment to respect human rights particularly <em>relevant to the sector</em>: Vulnerable groups</strong></p>\r\n<p><strong>A.1.4 Commitment to remedy </strong></p>\r\n<p><strong>A.1.5 Commitment to respect the rights of human rights defenders</strong></p>",
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18830657",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245422",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244475",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18832230",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18832244",
          "weight": 12.5
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_A_Governance_and_policy_commitments.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_A_1_Policy_commitments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18994070,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.1.S2 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights functions (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_S2_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.1.S2 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights functions (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfill all the requirements on CHRB B.1.1.S2 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights functions?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.1.S2 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights functions (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var accepted_options_1, accepted_options_2, all,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_options_1 = [\"Describes day-to-day responsibility for implementing HRs commitments\", \"Day-to-day resources and expertise allocation in own operations\", \"Resources and expertise allocation in supply chain\"];\n\n  accepted_options_2 = [\"Describes day-to-day responsibility for implementing HRs commitments\", \"Day-to-day resources and expertise allocation in own operations\", \"Resources and expertise allocation with EX BPs\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (all(accepted_options_1, b11s2) || all(accepted_options_2, b11s2)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(b11s2, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022248",
          "name": "b11s2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_S2_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_S2_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 18994119,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.1.S2 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights functions (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_S2_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.1.S2 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights functions (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_S2_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19017215,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB Theme A - Governance and policy commitments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_A_Governance_and_policy_commitments.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB Theme A - Governance and policy commitments",
      "question": "What does the company score on human rights related policy commitments and how they are governed?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This measurement theme focuses on a company’s human rights related policy commitments and how they are governed. It includes two related sub-themes: </p>\r\n<p><strong>Policy commitments: </strong>These indicators aim to assess the extent to which a company acknowledges its responsibility to respect human rights, and how it formally incorporates this into publicly available statements of policy.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Board-level accountability: </strong>These indicators seek to assess how the company’s policy commitments are managed as part of the board’s role and responsibility.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The themes mentioned on the about section are broken down into the following indicators and weightings:</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A.1 Policy commitments (50%)</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">A.1.1 Commitment to respect human rights</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">A.1.2 Commitment to respect the human rights of workers</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\">A.1.2.a ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\">at Work</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\">A.1.2.b Health and safety and working hours</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">A.1.3 Commitment to respect human rights particularly relevant to</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">the sector</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\">A.1.3.a Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\">A.1.3.b Security</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">A.1.4 Commitment to remedy</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">A.1.5 Commitment to respect the rights of human rights defenders</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A.2 Board level accountability (50%)</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">A.2.1 Commitment from the top</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">A.2.2 Board responsibility</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">A.2.3 Incentives and performance management</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">A.2.4 Business model strategy and risks</p>",
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18991398",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18832317",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Total_Corporate_Human_Rights_Benchmark_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_E_Response_to_serious_allegations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_A_Governance_and_policy_commitments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19017429,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.2.S1 Incentives and performance management+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_2_S1_Incentives_and_performance_management+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.2.S1 Incentives and performance management",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Senior manager incentives linked to HRs commitments\":\"5\",\"Incentive scheme linked to key HRs risks beyond employee H&S\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_2_Incentives_and_performance_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_2_S1_Incentives_and_performance_management+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19017489,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.2.S2 Incentives and performance management+Vasiliki Gkatziaki",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_2_S2_Incentives_and_performance_management+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.2.S2 Incentives and performance management",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Performance criteria linked to HRs made public\":\"5\",\"Review of other senior management incentives for coherence with HRs policies\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_2_Incentives_and_performance_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_2_S2_Incentives_and_performance_management+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19017623,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.2 Incentives and performance management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_2_Incentives_and_performance_management.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.2 Incentives and performance management",
      "question": "What does the company score on providing incentives to senior managers linked to implementation of the company's human rights policy commitments or targets?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19017429",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19017489",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_1_Embedding_Respect_for_Human_Rights_in_Company_Culture_and_Management_Systems.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_2_Incentives_and_performance_management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19018344,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.3.S1 Integration with enterprise risk management+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_3_S1_Integration_with_enterprise_risk_management+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.3.S1 Integration with enterprise risk management",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"HRs risks integrated as part of enterprise risk system\":\"5\",\"Provides an example\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_3_Integration_with_enterprise_risk_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_3_S1_Integration_with_enterprise_risk_management+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19018360,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.3.S2 Integration with enterprise risk management+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_3_S2_Integration_with_enterprise_risk_management+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.3.S2 Integration with enterprise risk management",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_3_Integration_with_enterprise_risk_management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_3_S2_Integration_with_enterprise_risk_management+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19018450,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.3 Integration with enterprise risk management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_3_Integration_with_enterprise_risk_management.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.3 Integration with enterprise risk management",
      "question": "What does the company score on integrating attention to human rights risks into its broader enterprise risk management system(s)?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19018344",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19018360",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_1_Embedding_Respect_for_Human_Rights_in_Company_Culture_and_Management_Systems.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_3_Integration_with_enterprise_risk_management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19020914,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.4.a.S2 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Workers and external stakeholders (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_S2_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.4.a.S2 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Workers and external stakeholders (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfill all the requirements on CHRB B.1.4.a.S2 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Workers and external stakeholders and meet all ILO requirements for own operations under indicator A.1.2.a Score 1",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.4.a.S2 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Workers and external stakeholders (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var all, options,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  options = [\"Communicates HRs policies to stakeholders\", \"Example of how HRs policies are accessible for intended audience\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (indexOf.call(comms_policy_s2, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (all(options, comms_policy_s2) && ilo_declarations_s1 === 10) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022320",
          "name": "comms_policy_s2"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18830808",
          "name": "ilo_declarations_s1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_S2_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_S2_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19021466,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.4.a.S2 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Workers and external stakeholders (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_S2_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.4.a.S2 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Workers and external stakeholders (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_S2_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19021575,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.4.a Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s): Workers and external stakeholders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.4.a Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s): Workers and external stakeholders",
      "question": "What does the company score on communicating its human rights policy commitment(s) to employees and other workers as well as to external stakeholders, in particular affected stakeholders?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 12 and 16(d); UNGPRF A.1.3</em></p>\r\n<p>The company communicates its human rights policy commitment(s) to employees and other workers as well as to external stakeholders, in particular affected stakeholders. This includes the ILO core labour standards at a minimum.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19054807",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19021466",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_1_Embedding_Respect_for_Human_Rights_in_Company_Culture_and_Management_Systems.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19021900,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.2.a.S2 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Categorical)+Vasiliki Gkatziaki",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_S2_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work_Categorical+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.2.a.S2 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_b_S1_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Business_relationships_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_a_S2_ILO_Declaration_on_Fundamental_Principles_and_Rights_at_Work_Categorical+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19023141,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.4.b.S1 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Business relationships (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_b_S1_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Business_relationships_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.4.b.S1 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Business relationships (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfill all the requirements on CHRB B.1.4.b.S1 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Business relationships and meet all ILO requirements for own operations under indicator A.1.2.a Score 1",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.4.b.S1 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Business relationships (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var CHRB_b14bs1, accepted_value,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_value = \"Describes steps to communicate HRs policies to supply chain/EX BPs OR Requires them to communicate HRs policies\";\n\n  CHRB_b14bs1 = CHRB_b14bs1.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Meets ILO requirement for suppliers on A.1.2.a\";\n  });\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_b14bs1, accepted_value) >= 0 && CHRB_a12as2 === 10) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_b14bs1, \"None of the above\") >= 0 || CHRB_b14bs1.length === 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19021900",
          "name": "CHRB_a12as2"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18022332",
          "name": "CHRB_b14bs1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_b_S1_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Business_relationships_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_b_S1_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Business_relationships_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19023160,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.4.b.S1 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Business relationships (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_b_S1_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Business_relationships_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.4.b.S1 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Business relationships (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_b_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Business_relationships.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_b_S1_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Business_relationships_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19023269,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.4.b.S2 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Business relationships+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_b_S2_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Business_relationships+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.4.b.S2 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Business relationships",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Describes how HRs policies are contractual/binding for suppliers\":\"5\",\"Requires suppliers to cascade contractual/binding HRs policies to its suppliers\":\"5\",\"Requires EX BPs to cascade contractual/binding HRs policies to their BPs\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_b_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Business_relationships.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_b_S2_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Business_relationships+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19023403,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.4.b Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s): Business relationships",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_b_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Business_relationships.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.4.b Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s): Business relationships",
      "question": "What does the company score on communicating its human rights policy commitment(s) to its business relationships?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 16(d); UNGPRF A1.3 and A2.4 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company communicates its human rights policy commitment(s) to its business relationships. In addition, it reflects its human rights commitments within the terms of its contracts (or other equivalent,binding arrangements) with business relationships (see also indicator B.1.7). This includes the ILO core labour standards at a minimum.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19023160",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19023269",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_1_Embedding_Respect_for_Human_Rights_in_Company_Culture_and_Management_Systems.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_b_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Business_relationships+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19023845,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.5.S1 Training on human rights (Cetegorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_S1_Training_on_human_rights_Cetegorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.5.S1 Training on human rights (Cetegorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfill all the requirements on CHRB B.1.5.S1 Training on human rights and scores at least 1\r\npoint under indicator A.1.2.a?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.5.S1 Training on human rights (Cetegorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var CHRB_b15s1, accepted_value,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_value = \"Describes how workers are trained on HRs policy commitments OR Trains relevant managers including procurement on HRs OR Trains relevant managers including security on HRs\";\n\n  CHRB_b15s1 = CHRB_b15s1.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== 'Score of at least 1 on A.1.2.a';\n  });\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_b15s1, accepted_value) >= 0 && CHRB_a12a >= 5) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_b15s1, \"None of the above\") >= 0 || CHRB_b15s1.length === 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022356",
          "name": "CHRB_b15s1"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18831998",
          "name": "CHRB_a12a"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_S1_Training_on_human_rights_Cetegorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_S1_Training_on_human_rights_Cetegorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19024198,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.5.S1 Training on human rights (Cetegorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_S1_Training_on_human_rights_Cetegorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.5.S1 Training on human rights (Cetegorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_Training_on_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_S1_Training_on_human_rights_Cetegorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19024665,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.5.S2 Training on human rights (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_S2_Training_on_human_rights_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.5.S2 Training on human rights (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfill all the requirements on CHRB B.1.5.S2 Training on human rights and scores full points under A.1.2.a?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.5.S2 Training on human rights (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var CHRB_b15s2, accepted_options_1, accepted_options_2, all,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_options_1 = [\"Trains suppliers to meet HRs commitments\", \"Discloses % suppliers trained\"];\n\n  accepted_options_2 = [\"Trains BPs to meet HRs commitments\", \"Discloses % suppliers trained\"];\n\n  CHRB_b15s2 = CHRB_b15s2.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Score of 2 on A.1.2.a\";\n  });\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if ((all(accepted_options_1, CHRB_b15s2) || all(accepted_options_2, CHRB_b15s2)) && CHRB_a12a === 10) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_b15s2, \"None of the above\") >= 0 || CHRB_b15s2.length === 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022368",
          "name": "CHRB_b15s2"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18831998",
          "name": "CHRB_a12a"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_S2_Training_on_human_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_S2_Training_on_human_rights_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19025589,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.5.S2 Training on human rights (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_S2_Training_on_human_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.5.S2 Training on human rights (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_Training_on_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_S2_Training_on_human_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19025729,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.5 Training on human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_Training_on_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.5 Training on human rights",
      "question": "What does the company scores on trainings of its workers and business relationships on its\r\nhuman rights policy commitment(s)?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 12; UNGPRF A1.3; GRI 410-1 and 412-2</em></p>\r\n<p>The company trains its workers and business relationships on its human rights policy commitment(s). This includes the ILO core labour standards at a minimum.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19024198",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19025589",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_1_Embedding_Respect_for_Human_Rights_in_Company_Culture_and_Management_Systems.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_5_Training_on_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19026071,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.6.S1 Monitoring and corrective actions (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_S1_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.6.S1 Monitoring and corrective actions (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfill all the requirements on CHRB B.1.6.S1 Monitoring and corrective actions and scores at least half points under A.1.2.a?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.6.S1 Monitoring and corrective actions (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var CHRB_b16s1, accepted_options_1, accepted_options_2, all,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_options_1 = [\"Monitors implementation of HRs policy commitments across global ops and supply chain\", \"Discloses % of supply chain monitored\", \"Describes how workers are involved in monitoring\"];\n\n  accepted_options_2 = [\"Monitors implementation of HRs policy commitments across global ops and EX BPs\", \"Discloses % of EX BP's monitored\", \"Describes how workers are involved in monitoring\"];\n\n  CHRB_b16s1 = CHRB_b16s1.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Score of 1 on A.1.2.a\";\n  });\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if ((all(accepted_options_1, CHRB_b16s1) || all(accepted_options_2, CHRB_b16s1)) && CHRB_a12a === 5) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_b16s1, \"None of the above\") >= 0 || CHRB_b16s1.length === 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022380",
          "name": "CHRB_b16s1"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18831998",
          "name": "CHRB_a12a"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_S1_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_S1_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19026472,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.6.S1 Monitoring and corrective actions (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_S1_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.6.S1 Monitoring and corrective actions (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_S1_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19053753,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.6.S2 Monitoring and corrective actions (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_S2_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.6.S2 Monitoring and corrective actions (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfill all the requirements on CHRB B.1.6.S1 Monitoring and corrective actions and scores full points under A.1.2.a?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.6.S2 Monitoring and corrective actions (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var CHRB_b16s2, accepted_options, all,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_options = [\"Describes corrective actions process\", \"Discloses findings and number of correction action processes\"];\n\n  CHRB_b16s2 = CHRB_b16s2.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Score of 2 on A.1.2.a\";\n  });\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (all(accepted_options, CHRB_b16s2) && CHRB_a12a === 10) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_b16s2, \"None of the above\") >= 0 || CHRB_b16s2.length === 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022392",
          "name": "CHRB_b16s2"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18831998",
          "name": "CHRB_a12a"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_S2_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_S2_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19053930,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.6.S2 Monitoring and corrective actions (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_S2_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.6.S2 Monitoring and corrective actions (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_S2_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19054078,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.6 Monitoring and corrective actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.6 Monitoring and corrective actions",
      "question": "What does the company score on monitoring the implementation of its human rights policy commitment(s) across its operations and business relationships?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 12 and 20; UNGRPF C4, C4.3 and C5; GRI 414-2</em></p>\r\n<p>The company monitors the implementation of its human rights policy commitment(s) across its operations and business relationships and follows up on corrective actions and necessary changes to policies or processes and discloses its findings. The company involves workers in this process. This includes the ILO core labour standards at a minimum.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> Indicators B.1.6 and B.2.3 are related but focus on different dimensions of a company’s actions: B.1.6 (which is in section B.1 on management systems) is about the company’s systemic approach to on-going monitoring and follow up on policy implementation while B.2.3 (which is in section B.2 on human rights due diligence) is about a specific step in the human rights due diligence process in addressing salient (or other) human rights risks and impacts.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19026472",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19053930",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_1_Embedding_Respect_for_Human_Rights_in_Company_Culture_and_Management_Systems.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_6_Monitoring_and_corrective_actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19054174,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.7.S1 Engaging and terminating business relationships+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_7_S1_Engaging_and_terminating_business_relationships+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.7.S1 Engaging and terminating business relationships",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"HRs performance affects selection suppliers\":\"5\",\"HRs performance affects selection EX BPs\":\"5\",\"HRs performance affects continuation supplier relationships\":\"5\",\"HRs performance affects ongoing BPs relationships\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_7_Engaging_and_terminating_business_relationships.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_7_S1_Engaging_and_terminating_business_relationships+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19054238,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.7.S2 Engaging and terminating business relationships+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_7_S2_Engaging_and_terminating_business_relationships+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.7.S2 Engaging and terminating business relationships",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_7_Engaging_and_terminating_business_relationships.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_7_S2_Engaging_and_terminating_business_relationships+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19054316,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.7 Engaging and terminating business relationships",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_7_Engaging_and_terminating_business_relationships.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.7 Engaging and terminating business relationships",
      "question": "What does the company score on human rights considerations when deciding to engage or terminate business relationships?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 13 and 19; UNGPRF A2.4; HRIB, 8.1.1; GRI 103-2, 414-1 and 414-2</em></p>\r\n<p>The company takes human rights considerations into account when deciding to engage or terminate business relationships. This includes offering incentives and support to business relationships to meet the company's requirements.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19054174",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19054238",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_1_Embedding_Respect_for_Human_Rights_in_Company_Culture_and_Management_Systems.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_7_Engaging_and_terminating_business_relationships+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19054372,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.8.S1 Approach to engaging with affected stakeholders+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_8_S1_Approach_to_engaging_with_affected_stakeholders+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.8.S1 Approach to engaging with affected stakeholders",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Describes how workers and communities identified and engaged in the last two years OR Discloses stakeholders whose HRs may be affected\":\"5\",\"Provides two examples of engagement with stakeholders\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_8_Approach_to_engaging_with_affected_stakeholders.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_8_S1_Approach_to_engaging_with_affected_stakeholders+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19054405,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.8.S2 Approach to engaging with affected stakeholders+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_8_S2_Approach_to_engaging_with_affected_stakeholders+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.8.S2 Approach to engaging with affected stakeholders",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Analysis of stakeholder views on company's HRs issues\":\"5\",\"Describes how stakeholders views influenced company's HRs approach\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_8_Approach_to_engaging_with_affected_stakeholders.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_8_S2_Approach_to_engaging_with_affected_stakeholders+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19054506,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.8 Approach to engaging with affected stakeholders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_8_Approach_to_engaging_with_affected_stakeholders.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.8 Approach to engaging with affected stakeholders",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 18 and 21; UNGPRF C2 and C2.1; GRI 102-42, 102-43 and 102-44</em></p>\r\n<p>The company has an approach to engaging with stakeholders on a regular basis. In doing so, it identifies affected stakeholders and engages in regular dialogue on human rights issues with them and their legitimate representatives. It also pays particular attention to those at heightened risk of vulnerability or marginalisation and prohibits bribes or other favours that may divide communities. To facilitate informed engagement, the company provides meaningful information in accessible formats and languages. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> Engagement with affected stakeholders means engaging in a dialogue with the stakeholders who might be, or are, impacted by the company’s activities and/or with their legitimate representatives. Depending on the nature of the company's operations, this can include (but is not limited to) workers, their families, local communities, consumers, and any other person or group of people whose life and environment might be impacted. Legitimate representatives are those that the affected stakeholders have asked to represent them. This can include (but is not limited to) community representatives, legal representatives and trade unions, community-based organisations and civil society organisations.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19054372",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19054405",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_1_Embedding_Respect_for_Human_Rights_in_Company_Culture_and_Management_Systems.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_8_Approach_to_engaging_with_affected_stakeholders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19054751,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.4.a.S1 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Workers and external stakeholders (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_S1_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.4.a.S1 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Workers and external stakeholders (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfill all the requirements on CHRB B.1.4.a.S1 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Workers and external stakeholders and scores full points under A.1.2.a.S1?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.4.a.S1 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Workers and external stakeholders (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var CHRB_b14as1, accepted_option,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_option = \"Communicates HRs policies to all workers in own operations\";\n\n  CHRB_b14as1 = CHRB_b14as1.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Score of 1 on A.1.2.a\";\n  });\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_b14as1, accepted_option) >= 0 && CHRB_a12as1 === 10) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_b14as1, \"None of the above\") >= 0 || CHRB_b14as1.length === 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022308",
          "name": "CHRB_b14as1"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18830808",
          "name": "CHRB_a12as1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_S1_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_S1_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19054807,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.4.a.S1 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Workers and external stakeholders (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_S1_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.4.a.S1 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s) - Workers and external stakeholders (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_4_a_S1_Communication_dissemination_of_policy_commitment_s_Workers_and_external_stakeholders_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19056364,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.1 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights functions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.1 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights functions",
      "question": "What does the company score on outlining senior level responsibility for human rights within the company as well as the organisation of the day-to-day responsibility for human rights across relevant internal functions?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 19; UNGPRF A2 and A2.1; GRI 102-19 and 102-20</em></p>\r\n<p>The company outlines senior level responsibility for human rights within the company as well as the organisation of the day-to-day responsibility for human rights across relevant internal functions. This includes responsibility for the ILO core labour standards at a minimum. </p>\r\n<p>The company also allocates resources and expertise for the day-today management of human rights within its operations and business relationships. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> Board level responsibility is assessed under indicator A.2.1 and therefore not considered in this indicator</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18994119",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19122382",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_1_Embedding_Respect_for_Human_Rights_in_Company_Culture_and_Management_Systems.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19056463,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB Theme B.1 - Embedding Respect for Human Rights in Company Culture and Management Systems",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_1_Embedding_Respect_for_Human_Rights_in_Company_Culture_and_Management_Systems.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB Theme B.1 - Embedding Respect for Human Rights in Company Culture and Management Systems",
      "question": "What the company scores on embedding respect for human rights in company culture and management systems?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Key concepts:</p>\r\n<p><strong>Key sector risks:</strong> The risks commonly regarded as potentially severe and/or likely within the sector and that companies are expected to demonstrate, through a process of human rights due diligence, how they are preventing them or why they are not relevant. Therefore, while these risks are anticipated to be relevant given the company’s sector, they may not necessarily be the individual company’s most salient human rights issues. These may change over time.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Salient human rights issues:</strong> Those human rights that are at risk of the most severe negative impacts through a company’s activities or business relationships. Therefore they vary from company to company, and over time.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Materiality:</strong> Refers to what is really important or has great consequences. The various definitions of materiality take differing views depending on who is asking and for what purpose. For company public reporting, materiality often refers to a threshold used to determine what information a company will disclose in its formal reporting. Definitions of what constitutes that threshold vary considerably.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19056364",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19017623",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19018450",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19021575",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19023403",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19025729",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19054078",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19054316",
          "weight": 18.18
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19054506",
          "weight": 18.18
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_Embedding_respect_and_human_rights_due_diligence.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_1_Embedding_Respect_for_Human_Rights_in_Company_Culture_and_Management_Systems+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19122372,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.1.S1 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights functions (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_S1_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.1.S1 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights functions (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfill all the requirements on CHRB B.1.1.S1 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights functions and scores full points under A.1.2.a?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.1.S1 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights functions (Categorical)+Vasiliki Gkatziaki"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var CHRB_b11s1,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  CHRB_b11s1 = CHRB_b11s1.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Score of 1 on A.1.2.a\";\n  });\n\n  if (CHRB_b11s1.length === 1 && CHRB_a12as1 === 10) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_b11s1, \"None of the above\") >= 0 || CHRB_b11s1.length === 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022236",
          "name": "CHRB_b11s1"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18830808",
          "name": "CHRB_a12as1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_S1_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions_Categorical+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_S1_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19122382,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.1.1.S1 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights functions (Categorical)+Vasiliki Gkatziaki",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_S1_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions_Categorical+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.1.1.S1 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights functions (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_1_1_S1_Responsibility_and_resources_for_day_to_day_human_rights_functions_Categorical+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19144310,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.1.S1 Identifying human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_S1_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.1.S1 Identifying human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfill all the requirements on CHRB B.2.1.S1 Identifying human rights risks and impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.1.S1 Identifying human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var accepted_values_1, accepted_values_2, all,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_values_1 = [\"Describes process of identifying risks in own operations\", \"Describes process for identifying risks in business relationships\"];\n\n  accepted_values_2 = [\"Describes process of identifying risks in own operations\", \"Describes process for identifying risks in EX BPs\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_b21s1, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (all(accepted_values_1, CHRB_b21s1) || all(accepted_values_2, CHRB_b21s1)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022455",
          "name": "CHRB_b21s1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_S1_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_S1_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19144693,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.1.S2 Identifying human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_S2_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.1.S2 Identifying human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfill all the requirements on CHRB B.2.1.S2 Identifying human rights risks and impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.1.S2 Identifying human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var accepted_values, all,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_values = [\"Describes global risk identification system incl. stakeholder consultation\", \"Describes how risk identification system is triggered by new circumstances\", \"Describes risks identified in relation to new circumstances\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_b21s2, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (all(accepted_values, CHRB_b21s2)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022467",
          "name": "CHRB_b21s2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_S2_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_S2_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19144703,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.1.S2 Identifying human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_S2_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.1.S2 Identifying human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_S2_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19144711,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.1.S1 Identifying human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_S1_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.1.S1 Identifying human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_S1_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19144817,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.1 Identifying human rights risks and impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.1 Identifying human rights risks and impacts",
      "question": "What does the company score on proactively identifying its human rights risks and impacts on an on-going basis, including when these are triggered by key moments in the company’s activities (e.g. policy change, market entry, new projects)?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 17 and 18; UNGPRF B2 and C3; HRIB, 1.2.1; GRI 412-1 and 414-2</em></p>\r\n<p>The company proactively identifies its human rights risks and impacts on an on-going basis, including when these are triggered by key moments in the company’s activities (e.g. policy change, market entry, new projects). This includes engaging with stakeholders and vulnerable groups as part of the identification process.</p>\r\n<p><em><strong>Note:</strong> If a company describes that it has a clear global system for identifying human rights risks and impacts, then it is assumed that it has this system in each particular location where it operates. As such, by complying with all criteria in Score 2, a company is automatically assumed to have achieved Score 1.</em></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19144711",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19144703",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_2_Human_rights_due_diligence.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_1_Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19145233,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.2.S1 Assessing human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_S1_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.2.S1 Assessing human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all the requirements on CHRB B.2.2.S1 Assessing human rights risks and impacts?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.2.S1 Assessing human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var accepted_values, oneof,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_values = [\"Describes how process applies to EX BPs\", \"Describes how process applies to supply chain\", \"Public disclosure of results of HRs risk assessment\"];\n\n  oneof = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) >= 0) {\n        return true;\n      }\n    }\n    return false;\n  };\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_b22s1, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (oneof(accepted_values, CHRB_b22s1) && indexOf.call(CHRB_b22s1, \"Describes assessment process and discloses salient HRs risks\") >= 0) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022479",
          "name": "CHRB_b22s1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_S1_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_S1_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19145295,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.2.S1 Assessing human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_S1_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.2.S1 Assessing human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_S2_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_S1_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19145439,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.2.S2 Assessing human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_S2_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.2.S2 Assessing human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on CHRB B.2.2.S2 Assessing human rights risks and impacts?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.2.S2 Assessing human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var CHRB_b22s2,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  CHRB_b22s2 = CHRB_b22s2.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Meets all requirements under score 1\";\n  });\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_b22s2, \"None of the above\") >= 0 || CHRB_b22s2.length === 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (CHRB_b22s1 === 10 && indexOf.call(CHRB_b22s2, \"Describes how assessment involved affected stakeholders\") >= 0) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022491",
          "name": "CHRB_b22s2"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19145295",
          "name": "CHRB_b22s1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_S2_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_S2_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19145805,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.2.S2 Assessing human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_S2_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.2.S2 Assessing human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_S2_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19145856,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.2 Assessing human rights risks and impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.2 Assessing human rights risks and impacts",
      "question": "What does the company score on assessing and prioritize its salient human rights risks and impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 17, 18 and 24; UNGPRF B1, B2 and C3; HRIB, 1.2.1.; GRI 412-1 and 414-2</em></p>\r\n<p>Having identified its human rights risks and impacts, the company assesses them and then prioritises its salient human rights risks and impacts. This includes engaging with stakeholders and vulnerable groups as part of the assessment process.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19145295",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19145805",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_2_Human_rights_due_diligence.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_2_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19146755,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.3.S1 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact assessments (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_S1_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.3.S1 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact assessments (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on CHRB B.2.3.S1 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact assessments?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.3.S1 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact assessments (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var accepted_values, oneof,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_values = [\"Describes how global system applies to supply chain\", \"Describes how global system applies to EX BPs\", \"Example of actions decided on at least 1 salient HRs issue\"];\n\n  oneof = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) >= 0) {\n        return true;\n      }\n    }\n    return false;\n  };\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_b23s1, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (oneof(accepted_values, CHRB_b23s1) && indexOf.call(CHRB_b23s1, \"Describes system to prevent mitigate and remediate HRs issues\") >= 0) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022506",
          "name": "CHRB_b23s1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_S1_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_S1_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19146777,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.3.S1 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact assessments (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_S1_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.3.S1 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact assessments (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_S2_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments_Categorical.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_S1_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19146907,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.3.S2 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact assessments (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_S2_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.3.S2 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact assessments (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on CHRB B.2.3.S2 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact assessments?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.3.S2 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact assessments (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var CHRB_b23s2,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  CHRB_b23s2 = CHRB_b23s2.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Meets all requirements under score 1\";\n  });\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_b23s2, \"None of the above\") >= 0 || CHRB_b23s2.length === 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (CHRB_b23s1 === 10 && indexOf.call(CHRB_b23s2, \"Describes how stakeholders involved in decisions about actions taken\") >= 0) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19146777",
          "name": "CHRB_b23s1"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18022518",
          "name": "CHRB_b23s2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_S2_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_S2_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19146974,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.3.S2 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact assessments (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_S2_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.3.S2 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact assessments (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_S2_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19149138,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.3 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact assessments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.3 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact assessments",
      "question": "What does the company score on integrating the findings of its assessments of human rights risks and impacts into relevant internal functions and processes in order to take appropriate actions to prevent, mitigate or remediate its salient human rights risks and impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 17, 19 and 24; UNGPRF C4; GRI 103-2</em></p>\r\n<p>The company integrates the findings of its assessments of human rights risks and impacts into relevant internal functions and processes in order to take appropriate actions to prevent, mitigate or remediate its salient human rights risks and impacts. This includes engaging with stakeholders and vulnerable groups on any action taken or to be taken.</p>\r\n<p><em>Note: Indicators B.1.6 and B.2.3 are related but focus on different dimensions of a company’s actions: B.1.6 (which is in section B.1 on management systems) is about the company’s systemic approach to on-going monitoring and follow up on policy implementation while B.2.3 (which is in section B.2 on human rights due diligence) is about a specific step in the human rights due diligence process in addressing salient (or other) human rights impacts.</em></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19146777",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19146974",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_2_Human_rights_due_diligence.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_3_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19149931,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.4.S2 Tracking the effectiveness of actions to respond to human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_S2_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.4.S2 Tracking the effectiveness of actions to respond to human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on CHRB B.2.4.S2 Tracking the effectiveness of actions to respond to human rights risks and impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.4.S2 Tracking the effectiveness of actions to respond to human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var CHRB_b24s2,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  CHRB_b24s2 = CHRB_b24s2.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Meets all requirements under score 1\";\n  });\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_b24s2, \"None of the above\") >= 0 || CHRB_b24s2.length === 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_b24s2, \"Involves stakeholders in evaluation effectiveness of actions\") >= 0 && CHRB_b24s1 === 10) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022542",
          "name": "CHRB_b24s2"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19150053",
          "name": "CHRB_b24s1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_S2_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_S2_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19149948,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.4.S2 Tracking the effectiveness of actions to respond to human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_S2_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.4.S2 Tracking the effectiveness of actions to respond to human rights risks and impacts (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_S2_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19150012,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.4.S1 Tracking the effectiveness of actions to respond to humanrights risks and impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_S1_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_humanrights_risks_and_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.4.S1 Tracking the effectiveness of actions to respond to humanrights risks and impacts",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_S1_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_humanrights_risks_and_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19150053,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.4.S1 Tracking the effectiveness of actions to respond to human\nrights risks and impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_S1_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.4.S1 Tracking the effectiveness of actions to respond to human\nrights risks and impacts",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_S2_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_human_rights_risks_and_impacts_Categorical.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_S1_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19150299,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.4 Tracking the effectiveness of actions to respond to human rights risks and impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.4 Tracking the effectiveness of actions to respond to human rights risks and impacts",
      "question": "What does the company score on tracking and evaluating the effectiveness of actions taken  in response to its human rights risks and impacts and describes how  it uses that information to improve processes and systems on an ongoing  basis?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Sources: UNGP 17, 20 and 24; UNGPRF C5; GRI 103-3</p>\r\n<p>The company tracks and evaluates the effectiveness of actions taken  in response to its human rights risks and impacts and describes how  it uses that information to improve processes and systems on an ongoing  basis. This includes engaging with stakeholders and vulnerable  groups when evaluating the effectiveness of any action taken.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19150053",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19149948",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_2_Human_rights_due_diligence.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_4_Tracking_the_effectiveness_of_actions_to_respond_to_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19150752,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.5.S1 Communicating on human rights impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_5_S1_Communicating_on_human_rights_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.5.S1 Communicating on human rights impacts",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_5_S2_Communicating_on_human_rights_impacts_Categorical.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_5_Communicating_on_human_rights_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_5_S1_Communicating_on_human_rights_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19150822,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.5.S2 Communicating on human rights impacts (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_5_S2_Communicating_on_human_rights_impacts_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.5.S2 Communicating on human rights impacts (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all the requirements on CHRB B.2.5.S2 Communicating on human rights impacts?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.5.S2 Communicating on human rights impacts (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (CHRB_b25s2 === \"No\") {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (CHRB_b25s2 === \"Yes\" && CHRB_b25s1 === 10) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022565",
          "name": "CHRB_b25s2"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19150752",
          "name": "CHRB_b25s1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_5_S2_Communicating_on_human_rights_impacts_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_5_S2_Communicating_on_human_rights_impacts_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19150892,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.5.S2 Communicating on human rights impacts (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_5_S2_Communicating_on_human_rights_impacts_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.5.S2 Communicating on human rights impacts (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_5_Communicating_on_human_rights_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_5_S2_Communicating_on_human_rights_impacts_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19150977,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB B.2.5 Communicating on human rights impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_5_Communicating_on_human_rights_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB B.2.5 Communicating on human rights impacts",
      "question": "What does the company score on communicating externally how it addresses its human rights impacts (i.e., throughout its due diligence process(es)) in a manner that is accessible to its intended audiences, especially affected stakeholders who have raised concerns, provides enough information to evaluate the adequacy of the response(s) and does not pose risks to affected stakeholders or personnel?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Sources: UNGP 20 and 21; UNGPRF C2</p>\r\n<p>The company communicates externally how it addresses its human rights impacts (i.e., throughout its due diligence process(es)) in a manner that is accessible to its intended audiences, especially affected stakeholders who have raised concerns, provides enough information to evaluate the adequacy of the response(s) and does not pose risks to affected stakeholders or personnel. Such communications should provide accurate, balanced and complete information. This type of communication is distinct from engagement with affected stakeholders for the purposes of assessing or addressing specific impacts (see also indicators B.1.8, B.2.1 and B.2.2).</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19150752",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19150892",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_2_Human_rights_due_diligence.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_B_2_5_Communicating_on_human_rights_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19151085,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.1.S1 Grievance mechanism(s) for workers+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_1_S1_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.1.S1 Grievance mechanism(s) for workers",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_1_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_workers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_1_S1_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19151214,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.1.S2 Grievance mechanism(s) for workers (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_1_S2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_workers_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.1.S2 Grievance mechanism(s) for workers (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on CHRB C.1.S2 Grievance mechanism(s) for workers?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.1.S2 Grievance mechanism(s) for workers (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var accepted_values_1, accepted_values_2, all,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_values_1 = [\"Grievance mechanism available in appropriate languages and workers made aware\", \"Describes how workers in supply chain access grievance mechanism\", \"Expects suppliers to convey expectation to their suppliers\"];\n\n  accepted_values_2 = [\"Grievance mechanism available in appropriate languages and workers made aware\", \"Describes how workers in EX BPs access grievance mechanism\", \"Expects EX BPs to convey expectation to their BPs\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_c1s2, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (all(accepted_values_1, CHRB_c1s2) || all(accepted_values_2, CHRB_c1s2)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022588",
          "name": "CHRB_c1s2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_1_S2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_workers_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_1_S2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_workers_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19151275,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.1.S2 Grievance mechanism(s) for workers (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_1_S2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_workers_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.1.S2 Grievance mechanism(s) for workers (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_1_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_workers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_1_S2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_workers_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19151292,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.1 Grievance mechanism(s) for workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_1_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_workers.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.1 Grievance mechanism(s) for workers",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19151085",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19151275",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_C_Remedies_and_grievance_mechanisms.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_1_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19151329,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.2.S1 Grievance mechanism(s) for external individuals and\ncommunities+Vasiliki Gkatziaki",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_2_S1_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_external_individuals_and_communities+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.2.S1 Grievance mechanism(s) for external individuals and\ncommunities",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_external_individuals_and_communities.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_2_S1_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_external_individuals_and_communities+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19151424,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.2.S2 Grievance mechanism(s) for external individuals and communities (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_2_S2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_external_individuals_and_communities_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.2.S2 Grievance mechanism(s) for external individuals and communities (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on CHRB C.2.S2 Grievance mechanism(s) for external individuals and communities?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.2.S2 Grievance mechanism(s) for external individuals and communities (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var accepted_values_1, accepted_values_2, all,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_values_1 = [\"Grievance mechanism available in appropriate languages and affected stakeholders made aware\", \"Describes how external individuals/communities access grievance mechanism\", \"Expects EX BPs to convey expectation to their BPs\"];\n\n  accepted_values_2 = [\"Grievance mechanism available in appropriate languages and affected stakeholders made aware\", \"Describes how external individuals/communities access grievance mechanism\", \"Expects supplier to convey expectation to their suppliers\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_c2s2, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (all(accepted_values_1, CHRB_c2s2) || all(accepted_values_2, CHRB_c2s2)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022615",
          "name": "CHRB_c2s2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_2_S2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_external_individuals_and_communities_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_2_S2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_external_individuals_and_communities_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19151442,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.2.S2 Grievance mechanism(s) for external individuals and communities (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_2_S2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_external_individuals_and_communities_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.2.S2 Grievance mechanism(s) for external individuals and communities (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_external_individuals_and_communities.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_2_S2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_external_individuals_and_communities_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19151536,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.2 Grievance mechanism(s) for external individuals and communities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_external_individuals_and_communities.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.2 Grievance mechanism(s) for external individuals and communities",
      "question": "What does the company score on mechanisms in place (its own, third party or shared) through which individuals and communities who may be adversely impacted by the company can raise complaints or concerns, including in relation to human rights issues?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 22, 29 and 30; UNGPRF C6.1 and C6.3; GRI 103-2; ARP 7.1, 8.1 and 8.8</em></p>\r\n<p>The company has one or more mechanisms (its own, third party or shared) through which individuals and communities who may be adversely impacted by the company can raise complaints or concerns, including in relation to human rights issues. The mechanism(s) is available to all external individuals and communities and takes into account accessibility by marginalised groups. The mechanism(s) does not preclude access to judicial or other non-judicial grievance mechanisms. UN Guiding Principle 31 provides relevant criteria for the design and operation of such mechanisms.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19151329",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19151442",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_C_Remedies_and_grievance_mechanisms.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_2_Grievance_mechanism_s_for_external_individuals_and_communities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19151617,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.3.S1 Users are involved in the design and performance of the\nmechanism(s)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_3_S1_Users_are_involved_in_the_design_and_performance_of_the_mechanism_s+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.3.S1 Users are involved in the design and performance of the\nmechanism(s)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_3_Users_are_involved_in_the_design_and_performance_of_the_mechanism_s.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_3_S1_Users_are_involved_in_the_design_and_performance_of_the_mechanism_s+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19151636,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.3.S2 Users are involved in the design and performance of the\nmechanism(s)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_3_S2_Users_are_involved_in_the_design_and_performance_of_the_mechanism_s+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.3.S2 Users are involved in the design and performance of the\nmechanism(s)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Describes how users engaged on improvement of mechanism\":\"5\",\"Provides user engagement examples (at least two) on improvement\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_3_Users_are_involved_in_the_design_and_performance_of_the_mechanism_s.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_3_S2_Users_are_involved_in_the_design_and_performance_of_the_mechanism_s+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19151710,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.3 Users are involved in the design and performance of the mechanism(s)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_3_Users_are_involved_in_the_design_and_performance_of_the_mechanism_s.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.3 Users are involved in the design and performance of the mechanism(s)",
      "question": "What does the company scores on engaging with potential or actual users on the design, implementation, performance and improvement of the mechanism(s)?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Sources: UNGP 31(h); UNGPRF C6.1, C6.2 and C6.3; ARP 7.3 and 14.1</p>\r\n<p>The company (or the initiative, in the case of a shared mechanism) engages with potential or actual users on the design, implementation, performance and improvement of the mechanism(s).</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19151617",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19151636",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_C_Remedies_and_grievance_mechanisms.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_3_Users_are_involved_in_the_design_and_performance_of_the_mechanism_s+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19151752,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.4.S2 Procedures related to the grievance mechanism(s) are\nequitable, publicly available and explained+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_4_S2_Procedures_related_to_the_grievance_mechanism_s_are_equitable_publicly_available_and_explained+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.4.S2 Procedures related to the grievance mechanism(s) are\nequitable, publicly available and explained",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Describe types of outcome to complainant through use of mechanism\":\"5\",\"Describes escalation to senior levels / independent adjudicators\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_4_Procedures_related_to_the_grievance_mechanism_s_are_equitable_publicly_available_and_explained.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_4_S2_Procedures_related_to_the_grievance_mechanism_s_are_equitable_publicly_available_and_explained+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19151756,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.4.S1 Procedures related to the grievance mechanism(s) are\nequitable, publicly available and explained+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_4_S1_Procedures_related_to_the_grievance_mechanism_s_are_equitable_publicly_available_and_explained+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.4.S1 Procedures related to the grievance mechanism(s) are\nequitable, publicly available and explained",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Describes procedure and timescales for managing complaints or concerns\":\"5\",\"Describes technical & financial & advisory support to enable equal access\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_4_Procedures_related_to_the_grievance_mechanism_s_are_equitable_publicly_available_and_explained.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_4_S1_Procedures_related_to_the_grievance_mechanism_s_are_equitable_publicly_available_and_explained+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19151787,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.4.S1 Procedures related to the grievance mechanism(s) areequitable, publicly available and explained",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_4_S1_Procedures_related_to_the_grievance_mechanism_s_areequitable_publicly_available_and_explained.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.4.S1 Procedures related to the grievance mechanism(s) areequitable, publicly available and explained",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_4_S1_Procedures_related_to_the_grievance_mechanism_s_areequitable_publicly_available_and_explained+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19152361,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB Theme B.2 - Human rights due diligence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_2_Human_rights_due_diligence.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB Theme B.2 - Human rights due diligence",
      "question": "What does the company score on human rights due diligence?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19144817",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19145856",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19149138",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19150299",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19150977",
          "weight": 16.67
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_Embedding_respect_and_human_rights_due_diligence.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_2_Human_rights_due_diligence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19152549,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB Theme B - Embedding respect and human rights due diligence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_Embedding_respect_and_human_rights_due_diligence.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB Theme B - Embedding respect and human rights due diligence",
      "question": "What does the company score on embedding respect and human rights due diligence?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This measurement theme assesses the extent of systems and processes established to implement the company’s policy commitments in practice. It includes two related sub-themes: </p>\r\n<p><strong>Embedding respect for human rights in company culture and management systems: </strong>These indicators seek to assess how the company’s human rights policy commitments are embedded in company culture and across its management systems and day-to-day activities, including within the management systems covering their business relationships. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Human rights due diligence: </strong>These indicators focus on the specific systems the company has in place to ensure that due diligence processes are implemented to assess the real-time risks to human rights that the company poses, to integrate and act on these findings so as to prevent and mitigate the impacts, and to track and communicate those actions. These indicators are aligned with the human rights due diligence steps in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. </p>\r\n<p><em>Note: The systems/processes described may be dedicated to addressing human rights or they may be integrated into wider systems for managing risks and impacts, provided the systems address risks and impacts to people and not just risks to the company. </em></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>These sub-themes are broken down into the following indicators and weightings:</p>\r\n<p><strong>B.1 Embedding respect for human rights in company culture and management systems (40%)</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">B.1.1 Responsibility and resources for day-to-day human rights functions</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">B.1.2 Incentives and performance management</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">B.1.3 Integration with enterprise risk management</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">B.1.4 Communication/dissemination of policy commitment(s)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\">B.1.4.a Workers and external stakeholders</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\">B.1.4.b Business relationships</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">B.1.5 Training on human rights</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">B.1.6 Monitoring and corrective actions</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">B.1.7 Engaging and terminating business relationships</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">B.1.8 Approach to engaging with affected stakeholders</p>\r\n<p><strong>B.2 Human rights due diligence (60%)</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">B.2.1 Identifying human rights risks and impacts</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">B.2.2 Assessing human rights risks and impacts</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">B.2.3 Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact assessments</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">B.2.4 Tracking the effectiveness of actions to respond to human rights risks and impacts</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">B.2.5 Communicating on human rights impacts</p>",
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19056463",
          "weight": 40
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19152361",
          "weight": 60
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Total_Corporate_Human_Rights_Benchmark_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_E_Response_to_serious_allegations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_B_Embedding_respect_and_human_rights_due_diligence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19152686,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.4 Procedures related to the grievance mechanism(s) are equitable, publicly available and explained",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_4_Procedures_related_to_the_grievance_mechanism_s_are_equitable_publicly_available_and_explained.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.4 Procedures related to the grievance mechanism(s) are equitable, publicly available and explained",
      "question": "What does the company scores on procedures related to the grievance mechanism(s) are equitable, publicly available and explained?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 19 and 31(c); UNGPRF C6.3; ARP 9.1, 9.2, 10.1, 10.5 and 10.6</em></p>\r\n<p>The company describes how complaints or concerns are received, processed and addressed. It also describes how those making complaints are informed throughout the process as well as how complaints may be escalated or withdrawn. In addition the company takes steps to ensure equitable access to and participation in grievance process(es) through the provision of technical, financial or advisory support, as may be appropriate in light of the mandate, objectives and operations of the grievance mechanism(s). This includes an explanation of what outcomes the grievance mechanism(s) can and cannot offer to users in the form of remedy(ies) (including financial and non-financial).</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19151756",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19151752",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_C_Remedies_and_grievance_mechanisms.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_4_Procedures_related_to_the_grievance_mechanism_s_are_equitable_publicly_available_and_explained+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19152773,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.5.S1 Prohibition of retaliation for raising complaints or concerns+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_5_S1_Prohibition_of_retaliation_for_raising_complaints_or_concerns+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.5.S1 Prohibition of retaliation for raising complaints or concerns",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Public statement prohibiting retaliation against workers/stakeholders\":\"5\",\"Describes practical measures to prevent retaliation\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_5_Prohibition_of_retaliation_for_raising_complaints_or_concerns.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_5_S1_Prohibition_of_retaliation_for_raising_complaints_or_concerns+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19152943,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.5.S2 Prohibition of retaliation for raising complaints or concerns (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_5_S2_Prohibition_of_retaliation_for_raising_complaints_or_concerns_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.5.S2 Prohibition of retaliation for raising complaints or concerns (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfils all requirements on CHRB C.5.S1 Prohibition of retaliation for raising complaints or concerns?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.5.S2 Prohibition of retaliation for raising complaints or concerns (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var accepted_values_1, accepted_values_2, all,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_values_1 = [\"Specifies no legal action/firing/violence\", \"Expects suppliers to prohibit retaliation against workers/stakeholders\"];\n\n  accepted_values_2 = [\"Specifies no legal action/firing/violence\", \"Expects EX BPs to prohibit retaliation against workers/stakeholders\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_c5s2, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (all(accepted_values_1, CHRB_c5s2) || all(accepted_values_2, CHRB_c5s2)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022687",
          "name": "CHRB_c5s2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_5_S2_Prohibition_of_retaliation_for_raising_complaints_or_concerns_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_5_S2_Prohibition_of_retaliation_for_raising_complaints_or_concerns_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19152985,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.5.S2 Prohibition of retaliation for raising complaints or concerns (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_5_S2_Prohibition_of_retaliation_for_raising_complaints_or_concerns_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.5.S2 Prohibition of retaliation for raising complaints or concerns (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_5_Prohibition_of_retaliation_for_raising_complaints_or_concerns.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_5_S2_Prohibition_of_retaliation_for_raising_complaints_or_concerns_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19153048,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.5 Prohibition of retaliation for raising complaints or concerns",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_5_Prohibition_of_retaliation_for_raising_complaints_or_concerns.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.5 Prohibition of retaliation for raising complaints or concerns",
      "question": "What does the company score on prohibition of retaliation for raising complaints or concerns?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 22 and 31; UNGPRF C6.2 and C6.3; ARP 8.9 and 9.4</em></p>\r\n<p>The company prohibits retaliation for raising complaints or concerns, including in relation to human rights issues. Retaliation can take many forms including physical, psychological, economic or legal harm. In addition, retaliation may take place against many different people depending on the context, not only the person raising the complaint or concern, but also involving family, representatives, colleagues, trade union representatives, human rights defenders, witnesses, interpreters, friends, and others. Economic forms of retaliation can include negative actions connected with a person’s employment including demotion, disciplinary action, firing, salary reduction, job or shift reassignment, anti-union discrimination and blacklisting. Legal forms of retaliation can include vexatious litigation and strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs). These are civil, criminal or administrative lawsuits without merit, but with the intent of preventing individuals or groups (including persons and organisations acting on their behalf) from engaging in criticism, opposition, public participation or similar activities in relation to a business' operations. (see also indicator A.1.6).</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19152773",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19152985",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_C_Remedies_and_grievance_mechanisms.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_5_Prohibition_of_retaliation_for_raising_complaints_or_concerns+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19153446,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.6.S2 Company involvement with state-based judicial and nonjudicial grievance mechanisms+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_6_S2_Company_involvement_with_state_based_judicial_and_nonjudicial_grievance_mechanisms+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.6.S2 Company involvement with state-based judicial and nonjudicial grievance mechanisms",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_6_Company_involvement_with_state_based_judicial_and_non_judicial_grievance_mechanisms.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_6_S2_Company_involvement_with_state_based_judicial_and_nonjudicial_grievance_mechanisms+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19153499,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.6.S1 Company involvement with state-based judicial and nonjudicial grievance mechanisms+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_6_S1_Company_involvement_with_state_based_judicial_and_nonjudicial_grievance_mechanisms+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.6.S1 Company involvement with state-based judicial and nonjudicial grievance mechanisms",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Complainants not asked to waive legal rights\":\"5\",\"Does not require confidentiality provisions\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_6_Company_involvement_with_state_based_judicial_and_non_judicial_grievance_mechanisms.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_6_S1_Company_involvement_with_state_based_judicial_and_nonjudicial_grievance_mechanisms+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19153543,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.7.S1 Remedying adverse impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_7_S1_Remedying_adverse_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.7.S1 Remedying adverse impacts",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_7_Remedying_adverse_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_7_S1_Remedying_adverse_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19153550,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.7.S2 Remedying adverse impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_7_S2_Remedying_adverse_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.7.S2 Remedying adverse impacts",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Partially\":\"5\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_7_Remedying_adverse_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_7_S2_Remedying_adverse_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19153600,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.8.S1 Communication on the effectiveness of grievance\nmechanism(s) and incorporating lessons learned+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_8_S1_Communication_on_the_effectiveness_of_grievance_mechanism_s_and_incorporating_lessons_learned+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.8.S1 Communication on the effectiveness of grievance\nmechanism(s) and incorporating lessons learned",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Discloses number of grievances filed/addressed or resolved and outcomes achieved\":\"5\",\"Example of how lessons from mechanism improved HRs management system\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_8_Communication_on_the_effectiveness_of_grievance_mechanism_s_and_incorporating_lessons_learned.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_8_S1_Communication_on_the_effectiveness_of_grievance_mechanism_s_and_incorporating_lessons_learned+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19153605,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.8.S1 Communication on the effectiveness of grievancemechanism(s) and incorporating lessons learned",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_8_S1_Communication_on_the_effectiveness_of_grievancemechanism_s_and_incorporating_lessons_learned.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.8.S1 Communication on the effectiveness of grievancemechanism(s) and incorporating lessons learned",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_8_S1_Communication_on_the_effectiveness_of_grievancemechanism_s_and_incorporating_lessons_learned+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19153652,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.8.S2 Communication on the effectiveness of grievance\nmechanism(s) and incorporating lessons learned+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_8_S2_Communication_on_the_effectiveness_of_grievance_mechanism_s_and_incorporating_lessons_learned+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.8.S2 Communication on the effectiveness of grievance\nmechanism(s) and incorporating lessons learned",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Describes process to evaluate mechanism and changes made as a result\":\"5\",\"Decribes procedures to address delays of outcomes agreed with stakeholders\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_8_Communication_on_the_effectiveness_of_grievance_mechanism_s_and_incorporating_lessons_learned.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_8_S2_Communication_on_the_effectiveness_of_grievance_mechanism_s_and_incorporating_lessons_learned+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19170330,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.6 Company involvement with state-based judicial and non-judicial grievance mechanisms",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_6_Company_involvement_with_state_based_judicial_and_non_judicial_grievance_mechanisms.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.6 Company involvement with state-based judicial and non-judicial grievance mechanisms",
      "question": "What does the company score on its involvement with state-based judicial and non-judicial grievance mechanisms?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGPRF C6; ARP 8.4</em></p>\r\n<p>The company does not impede access to state-based judicial or non-judicial mechanisms or other mechanisms (such as international mechanisms) for persons who make allegations of adverse human rights impacts. The company operates on the assumption that it will not require individuals to permanently waive their legal rights to bring a claim through a judicial or non-judicial process as a condition of participation in a grievance/mediation process and does not require confidentiality provisions (e.g., non-disclosure agreements) with respect to human rights grievances. It also does not impede access by competent authorities investigating and adjudicating credible allegations of human rights impacts. It participates in non-judicial grievance mechanisms provided by the state where these are available to resolve grievances.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19153499",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19153446",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_C_Remedies_and_grievance_mechanisms.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_6_Company_involvement_with_state_based_judicial_and_non_judicial_grievance_mechanisms+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19170397,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.7 Remedying adverse impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_7_Remedying_adverse_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.7 Remedying adverse impacts",
      "question": "What does the company score on remedying adverse impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 19, 22 and 31; UNGPRF C6, C6.4 and C6.5; GRI 103-2 and 413-2; ARP 12.2 and 13.1</em></p>\r\n<p>The company provides for or cooperates in remediation to victims where it has identified that it has caused or contributed to adverse human rights impacts (or others have brought such information to the company’s attention, such as through its grievance mechanism(s)). It also incorporates changes to systems, processes (e.g., human rights due diligence processes) and practices to prevent similar adverse impacts in the future.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19153543",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19153550",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_C_Remedies_and_grievance_mechanisms.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_7_Remedying_adverse_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19170464,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB C.8 Communication on the effectiveness of grievance mechanism(s) and incorporating lessons learned",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_8_Communication_on_the_effectiveness_of_grievance_mechanism_s_and_incorporating_lessons_learned.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB C.8 Communication on the effectiveness of grievance mechanism(s) and incorporating lessons learned",
      "question": "What does the company score on the communication on the effectiveness of grievance mechanism(s) and incorporating lessons learned?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ARP 11.2, 12.3 and 13.2</em></p>\r\n<p>The company discloses information about the practical operation of the grievance mechanism(s) for its own workers and external individuals/ communities that may be adversely impacted by the company’s operations. This may include the types/nature of grievances filed, the number of complaints rejected and the grounds, and the outcomes and follow-up activities for completed cases. The company also describes how lessons from the mechanism contributed to improve its human rights management system and how it reviews the effectiveness of the grievance mechanism(s) on an ongoing basis to improve its functioning and address delays or non-implementation of outcomes agreed with stakeholders.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19153600",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19153652",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_C_Remedies_and_grievance_mechanisms.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_C_8_Communication_on_the_effectiveness_of_grievance_mechanism_s_and_incorporating_lessons_learned+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19170680,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB Theme C - Remedies and grievance mechanisms",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_C_Remedies_and_grievance_mechanisms.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB Theme C - Remedies and grievance mechanisms",
      "question": "What does the company score on remedies and grievance mechanisms?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This measurement theme focuses on the extent to which a company provides remedy in addressing actual adverse impacts on human rights. It covers a company’s approach to providing or cooperating in remediation when human rights harms – actual human rights impacts – have occurred. This measurement theme also aims to assess the extent to which a company has appropriate processes in place so that grievances may be addressed early and remediated directly where appropriate. It also tests the company’s willingness to participate in other remedy options and its approach to litigation concerning credible allegations of human rights impacts.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This measurement theme is broken down into the following indicators:</p>\r\n<p>C.1 Grievance mechanism(s) for workers</p>\r\n<p>C.2 Grievance mechanism(s) for external individuals and communities</p>\r\n<p>C.3 Users are involved in the design and performance of the mechanism(s)</p>\r\n<p>C.4 Procedures related to the grievance mechanism(s) are equitable, publicly available and explained</p>\r\n<p>C.5 Prohibition of retaliation for raising complaints or concerns</p>\r\n<p>C.6 Company involvement with state-based judicial and nonjudicial grievance mechanisms</p>\r\n<p>C.7 Remedying adverse impacts</p>",
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19151292",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19151536",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19151710",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19152686",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19153048",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19170330",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19170397",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19170464",
          "weight": 10
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Total_Corporate_Human_Rights_Benchmark_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_E_Response_to_serious_allegations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_C_Remedies_and_grievance_mechanisms+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19170779,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.1.S1 Living wage (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_1_S1_Living_wage_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.1.S1 Living wage (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Pays living wage or sets time-bound target\":\"5\",\"Describes how living wage determined\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_1_Living_wage_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_1_S1_Living_wage_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19170815,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.1.S2 Living wage (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_1_S2_Living_wage_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.1.S2 Living wage (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Achieved paying living wage\":\"5\",\"Reviews definition living wage with unions\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 56,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 56,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_1_Living_wage_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_1_S2_Living_wage_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19170876,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.1 Living wage (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_1_Living_wage_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.1 Living wage (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": "What does the company score on living wages?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: IICESCR, Art. 7; HRIB, 2.4.1, ETI, 5; SA8000; GLWC; SA8000, IV.8.1</em></p>\r\n<p>The company pays all its workers a living wage or discloses a time bound target to do so. The company regularly reviews its definition of the living wage and negotiates through collective bargaining with relevant trade unions (or equivalent worker bodies where the rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining are restricted under law). There are numerous definitions of living wage, but the core concept is to provide a decent living for a worker and his or her family (in line with Article 7 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights) based on a regular work week not including overtime hours. A living wage is sufficient to cover food, water, clothing, transport, education, health care and other essential needs for workers and their officially entitled dependents and provide some discretionary income. Workers also receive equal pay for equal work.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19170779",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19170815",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_EX_D3_Performance_Company_human_rights_practices_Extractives_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_1_Living_wage_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19170922,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.2.S2 Transparency and accountability (in own extractive\noperations, which includes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_2_S2_Transparency_and_accountability_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.2.S2 Transparency and accountability (in own extractive\noperations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_2_Transparency_and_accountability_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_2_S2_Transparency_and_accountability_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19170928,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.2.S1 Transparency and accountability (in own extractive\noperations, which includes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_2_S1_Transparency_and_accountability_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.2.S1 Transparency and accountability (in own extractive\noperations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 56,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 56,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_2_Transparency_and_accountability_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_2_S1_Transparency_and_accountability_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19170978,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.2 Transparency and accountability (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_2_Transparency_and_accountability_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.2 Transparency and accountability (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": "What does the company score on transparency and accountability?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: IEITI; RMF B.04.1</em></p>\r\n<p>The company understands the importance of more openness around how countries and businesses manage natural resource wealth to ensure that these resources can benefit all citizens and demonstrates this by participating in initiatives on transparency, in particular on revenue transparency or disclosing payments and contracts.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19170928",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19170922",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_EX_D3_Performance_Company_human_rights_practices_Extractives_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_2_Transparency_and_accountability_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19170999,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.3.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own\nextractive operations, which includes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_3_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.3.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own\nextractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_3_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_3_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19171003,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.3.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own\nextractive operations, which includes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_3_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.3.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own\nextractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_3_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_3_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19171032,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.3.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in ownextractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_3_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_ownextractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.3.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in ownextractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_3_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_ownextractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19171040,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.3.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in ownextractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_3_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_ownextractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.3.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in ownextractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_3_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_ownextractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19171147,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.3 Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_3_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.3 Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": "What does the company score on the freedom of association and collective bargaining?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7; ICCPR, Art. 22; ILO, No. 87 and No. 98; HRIB 2.6; FLA VI.FOA.1, VI.FOA.3 and VI.FOA.4; SA8000; GRI 407-1; SA8000 IV.4</em></p>\r\n<p>The company respects the right of all workers to form and join a trade union of their choice (or equivalent worker bodies where the rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining are restricted under law) and to bargain collectively. In addition, it provides workers’ representatives with appropriate facilities to assist in the development of effective collective bargaining agreement(s). The company also prohibits intimidation, harassment, retaliation and violence against trade union members and trade union representatives.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19171003",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19170999",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_EX_D3_Performance_Company_human_rights_practices_Extractives_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_3_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19171340,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.4.S1 Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs) (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_4_S1_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.4.S1 Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs) (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on D.3.4.S1 Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.4.S1 Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var accepted_values, all,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_values = [\"Describes process to identify H&S risks and impacts\", \"Discloses injury rate or lost days for last reporting period\", \"Discloses fatalities for last reporting period\", \"Discloses occupational disease rate for last reporting period\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (all(accepted_values, CHRB_d34s1)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d34s1, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18023861",
          "name": "CHRB_d34s1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_4_S1_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_4_S1_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19177220,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.4.S1 Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_4_S1_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.4.S1 Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs) (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_4_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_4_S1_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19177264,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.4.S2 Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational\ndisease rates (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_4_S2_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.4.S2 Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational\ndisease rates (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Set targets for H&S performance\":\"5\",\"Met targets or explains why not or actions to improve H&S management systems\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_4_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_4_S2_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19177354,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.4 Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_4_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.4 Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": "What does the company score on health and safety?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7; HRIB 3.3; FLA VII.HSE.30; SA8000; GRI 403-9; SA8000 IV.3.5</em></p>\r\n<p>The company describes the process(es) it has in place to identify its health and safety risks and impacts and it discloses quantitative information on health and safety related to its total workforce, namely: injury rate, fatality rate, lost days (or near- miss frequency rate), and occupational disease rates.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19177264",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19177220",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_EX_D3_Performance_Company_human_rights_practices_Extractives_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_4_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19177413,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.5.S1 Indigenous peoples’ rights and free prior and informed\nconsent (FPIC) (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_5_S1_Indigenous_peoples_rights_and_free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.5.S1 Indigenous peoples’ rights and free prior and informed\nconsent (FPIC) (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Process to identify/recognise indigenous rights holders\":\"5\",\"Describes how indigenous communities are engage during assessment\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_5_Indigenous_peoples_rights_and_free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_5_S1_Indigenous_peoples_rights_and_free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19177423,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.5.S2 Indigenous peoples’ rights and free prior and informed\nconsent (FPIC) (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_5_S2_Indigenous_peoples_rights_and_free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.5.S2 Indigenous peoples’ rights and free prior and informed\nconsent (FPIC) (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Commitment to FPIC\":\"5\",\"Recent example of obtaining FPIC or not pursuing indigenous people's land/resources\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_5_Indigenous_peoples_rights_and_free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_5_S2_Indigenous_peoples_rights_and_free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19177482,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.5 Indigenous peoples’ rights and free prior and informed consent (FPIC) (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_5_Indigenous_peoples_rights_and_free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.5 Indigenous peoples’ rights and free prior and informed consent (FPIC) (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": "What does the company score on indigenous peoples' rights and free prior and informed consent (FPIC)?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNDRIP; ILO, No. 169; UNSR IP 2013; HRIB, 5.5 and 5.2.1; IFC PS, 7; ICMM PS 2013; IPIECA SOC-10.C1 and SOC-10.A1; GRI 411-1; RMF D.08.1</em></p>\r\n<p>The company respects indigenous peoples' rights in line with international law and standards on indigenous peoples in its processes to decide whether and how to carry out projects (or changes to existing projects) that are located in or impact on lands or territories or resources traditionally owned or occupied or traditionally or customarily used by indigenous peoples (legitimate tenure rights holders as set out in the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security) or on their cultural heritage. These processes assess and address impacts of the company’s activities and those of their business relationships and any related actions of the government.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19177413",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19177423",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_EX_D3_Performance_Company_human_rights_practices_Extractives_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_5_Indigenous_peoples_rights_and_free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19177488,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.6.S1 Land rights: Land acquisition (in own extractive operations,\nwhich includes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_6_S1_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.6.S1 Land rights: Land acquisition (in own extractive operations,\nwhich includes JVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_6_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_6_S1_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19177500,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.6.S2 Land rights: Land acquisition (in own extractive operations,\nwhich includes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_6_S2_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.6.S2 Land rights: Land acquisition (in own extractive operations,\nwhich includes JVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Describes approach to compensation including valuation\":\"5\",\"Describes steps to meet IFC PS 5 in state deals\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_6_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_6_S2_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19177573,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.6 Land rights: Land acquisition (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_6_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.6 Land rights: Land acquisition (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": "What does the company score on land rights?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Sources: IUN Voluntary Guidelines; HRIB 5.2; IFC PS 5; Interlaken Group 2015; USAID 2015; FDC 2014</p>\r\n<p>When acquiring, leasing or making other arrangements to use, or restrict the use of, land, the company recognises legitimate tenure rights, (as set out in the relevant part(s) of the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (VGGT), with particular attention to vulnerable or marginalised tenure rights holders, recognising that claims to tenure rights may be legitimate under the VGGT even when they are not recognised or registered by the government.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19177488",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19177500",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_EX_D3_Performance_Company_human_rights_practices_Extractives_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_6_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19177623,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.7.S2 Security (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_7_S2_Security_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.7.S2 Security (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Security and HRs assessment includes input from local communities\":\"5\",\"Two examples of working with local communities to improve security\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_7_Security_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_7_S2_Security_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19177627,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.7.S1 Security (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_7_S1_Security_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.7.S1 Security (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Describes security implementation (incl. VPs or ICOC) and provides an example\":\"5\",\"Ensures Business Partners/JVs follow security approach\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_7_Security_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_7_S1_Security_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19177684,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.7 Security (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_7_Security_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.7 Security (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": "What does the company scores on safety and security of operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICCPR, Art. 6 and 9; VPSHR; ICoCA; HRIB, 6; IFC PS, 4; GRI 410-1; IPIECA SHS-7.C1, SHS-7.A1, SOC-3.C2, SOC-3.C3 and SOC-3.A4</em></p>\r\n<p>The company maintains the safety and security of operations within an operating framework that ensures respect for human rights and international humanitarian law and acts in a manner consistent with <span style=\"text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">applicable international standards, particularly with regard to the use </span>of force.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19177627",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19177623",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_EX_D3_Performance_Company_human_rights_practices_Extractives_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_7_Security_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19177781,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.8.S1 Water and sanitation (in own extractive operations, which\nincludes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_8_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.8.S1 Water and sanitation (in own extractive operations, which\nincludes JVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_8_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_8_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19177846,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.8.S1 Water and sanitation (in own extractive operations, whichincludes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_8_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_extractive_operations_whichincludes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.8.S1 Water and sanitation (in own extractive operations, whichincludes JVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_8_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_extractive_operations_whichincludes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19177883,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.8.S2 Water and sanitation (in own extractive operations, which\nincludes JVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_8_S2_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.8.S2 Water and sanitation (in own extractive operations, which\nincludes JVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Sets targets on water stewardship that consider water use by local communities\":\"5\",\"Reports progress in meeting targets and trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_8_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_8_S2_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19177897,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.8.S2 Water and sanitation (in own extractive operations, whichincludes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_8_S2_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_extractive_operations_whichincludes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.8.S2 Water and sanitation (in own extractive operations, whichincludes JVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_8_S2_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_extractive_operations_whichincludes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19178194,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.8 Water and sanitation (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_8_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.8 Water and sanitation (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": "What does the company score on water and sanitation?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 11 and 12; SDG, 6, HRIB 5.1, UNGC CEO Water Mandate, UN GA Res 64/292: IPIECA ENV-1.C4 IPIECA ENV-2.A2; RMF F.03.1</em></p>\r\n<p>The company does not negatively affect access to safe water, in line with the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the UN Global Compact’s CEO Water Mandate.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19177781",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19177883",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_EX_D3_Performance_Company_human_rights_practices_Extractives_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_8_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19178418,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.9.S1 Women’s rights (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_9_S1_Women_s_rights_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.9.S1 Women’s rights (in own extractive operations, which includes\nJVs)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Describes processes to stop harassment and violence against women OR Working conditions take into account gender issues\":\"5\",\"Measures and steps to address gender pay gap at all levels of employment\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_9_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs_Categorical.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_9_Women_s_rights_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_9_S1_Women_s_rights_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19178544,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.9.S2 Women’s rights (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs) (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_9_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.9.S2 Women’s rights (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs) (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on CHRB D.3.9.S2 Women's rights (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.9.S2 Women’s rights (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var CHRB_d39s2,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  CHRB_d39s2 = CHRB_d39s2.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Meets all requirements under score 1\";\n  });\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d39s2, \"None of the above\") >= 0 || CHRB_d39s2.length === 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d39s2, \"Provides analysis of trends demonstrating closing gender pay gap\") >= 0 && CHRB_d39s1 === 10) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18023992",
          "name": "CHRB_d39s2"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19178418",
          "name": "CHRB_d39s1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_9_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_9_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19178575,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.9.S2 Women’s rights (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_9_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.9.S2 Women’s rights (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs) (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_9_Women_s_rights_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_9_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19178640,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.3.9 Women's rights (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_9_Women_s_rights_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.3.9 Women's rights (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)",
      "question": "What does the company score on women's rights?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICEDAW; ILO, No. 100 &amp; No. 111; WEP; HRIB, 2.7; ETI, 7 and 9; FLA II.ND.8 FLA VII.HSE.11 FLA VII.HSE.12 FLA VIII.HOW.4; FWF, 2;</em></p>\r\n<p>The company recognises the relevance of women's rights for the sector, given the prevalence of women workers and the different dimensions of inequality they often face. The company has measures in place to implement its policy commitment to eliminate discrimination against women through providing equal pay for equal work and measures to ensure equal opportunities throughout all levels of employment. These may include setting up women’s committees that report to management to address and resolve issues, gender-equality training, and eliminating working or employment conditions linked to marital status or family responsibilities or the absence of pregnancy. In addition, the company has in place measures to eliminate health and safety concerns that are particularly prevalent among women workers (e.g., sexual harassment, physical security, and protection and accommodation of pregnant and nursing workers).</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19178418",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19178575",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_EX_D3_Performance_Company_human_rights_practices_Extractives_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_3_9_Women_s_rights_in_own_extractive_operations_which_includes_JVs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19178909,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB Theme D (EX-D3) - Performance: Company human rights practices (Extractives sector)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_EX_D3_Performance_Company_human_rights_practices_Extractives_sector.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB Theme D (EX-D3) - Performance: Company human rights practices (Extractives sector)",
      "question": "What does the company score on human rights practices?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This measurement theme focuses on selected human rights related practices specific to each sector. The indicators seek to assess the actual practices occurring within companies in order to implement key enablers and business processes and to prevent specific impacts on human rights particularly at risk of occurring given the sector in question. </p>\r\n<p>Many of these interconnect with the other CHRB measurement themes and company approaches to policy commitments and governance, embedding respect for human rights in culture and management systems, undertaking human rights due diligence or implementing remediation processes. </p>\r\n<p>However, these indicators aid the inter- and intra-comparative benefits of the benchmark. Complemented by the CHRB performance indicators on responses to serious allegations (measurement theme E), these indicators seek to achieve a more comprehensive overall proxy measure for the human rights performance of a company being benchmarked. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>There are nine indicators for the Extractives companies in theme D, all of which are equally weighted. </p>\r\n<p>D.3.1 Living wage (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)</p>\r\n<p>D.3.2 Transparency and accountability (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)</p>\r\n<p>D.3.3 Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)</p>\r\n<p>D.3.4 Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)</p>\r\n<p>D.3.5 Indigenous peoples’ rights and free prior and informed consent (FPIC) (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)</p>\r\n<p>D.3.6 Land rights: Land acquisition (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)</p>\r\n<p>D.3.7 Security (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)</p>\r\n<p>D.3.8 Water and sanitation (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)</p>\r\n<p>D.3.9 Women’s rights (in own extractive operations, which includes JVs)</p>",
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19170876",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19170978",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19171147",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19177354",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19177482",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19177573",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19177684",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19178194",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19178640",
          "weight": 11.11
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_Company_human_rights_practices.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_EX_D3_Performance_Company_human_rights_practices_Extractives_sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228271,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 1",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_1.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 1",
      "question": "Did the company respond publicly to the first incident of human rights violations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 1+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 61,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 61,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_1+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228287,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 2",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_2.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 2",
      "question": "Did the company respond publicly to the second incident of human rights violations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 2+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 33,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 33,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_2+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228302,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 3",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_3.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 3",
      "question": "Did the company respond publicly to the third incident of human rights violations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 3+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 21,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_3+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228313,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 4",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_4.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 4",
      "question": "Did the company respond publicly to the fourth incident of human rights violations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 4+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 18,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_4+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228328,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 5",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_5.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 5",
      "question": "Did the company respond publicly to the fifth incident of human rights violations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 5+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_5+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_5+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228340,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 6",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_6.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 6",
      "question": "Did the company respond publicly to the sixth incident of human rights violations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 6+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_6+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_6+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228351,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 7",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_7.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 7",
      "question": "Did the company respond publicly to the seventh incident of human rights violations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 7+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_7+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_7+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228362,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 8",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_8.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 8",
      "question": "Did the company respond publicly to the eigth incident of human rights violations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 8+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_8+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_8+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228377,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 9",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_9.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 9",
      "question": "Did the company respond publicly to the ninth incident of human rights violations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 9+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_9+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_9+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228388,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 1",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_1.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 1",
      "question": "Did the company investigate and take appropriate action in regards to the first human rights violation incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Investigation or Action",
        "Minimal Investigation or Response",
        "Basic Investigation and Limited Action",
        "Comprehensive Investigation and Some Engagement",
        "Full Engagement and Systemic Improvement"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 1+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 61,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 61,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_1+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228399,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 2",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_2.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 2",
      "question": "Did the company investigate and take appropriate action in regards to the second human rights violation incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Investigation or Action",
        "Minimal Investigation or Response",
        "Basic Investigation and Limited Action",
        "Comprehensive Investigation and Some Engagement",
        "Full Engagement and Systemic Improvement"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 2+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 33,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 33,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_2+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228414,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 3",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_3.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 3",
      "question": "Did the company investigate and take appropriate action in regards to the third human rights violation incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Investigation or Action",
        "Minimal Investigation or Response",
        "Basic Investigation and Limited Action",
        "Comprehensive Investigation and Some Engagement",
        "Full Engagement and Systemic Improvement"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 3+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 21,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_3+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228425,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 4",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_4.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 4",
      "question": "Did the company investigate and take appropriate action in regards to the fourth human rights violation incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Investigation or Action",
        "Minimal Investigation or Response",
        "Basic Investigation and Limited Action",
        "Comprehensive Investigation and Some Engagement",
        "Full Engagement and Systemic Improvement"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 4+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 18,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_4+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228436,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 5",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_5.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 5",
      "question": "Did the company investigate and take appropriate action in regards to the fifth human rights violation incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Investigation or Action",
        "Minimal Investigation or Response",
        "Basic Investigation and Limited Action",
        "Comprehensive Investigation and Some Engagement",
        "Full Engagement and Systemic Improvement"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 5+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_5+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_5+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228451,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 6",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_6.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 6",
      "question": "Did the company investigate and take appropriate action in regards to the sixth human rights violation incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Investigation or Action",
        "Minimal Investigation or Response",
        "Basic Investigation and Limited Action",
        "Comprehensive Investigation and Some Engagement",
        "Full Engagement and Systemic Improvement"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 6+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_6+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_6+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228462,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 7",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_7.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 7",
      "question": "Did the company investigate and take appropriate action in regards to the seventh human rights violation incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Investigation or Action",
        "Minimal Investigation or Response",
        "Basic Investigation and Limited Action",
        "Comprehensive Investigation and Some Engagement",
        "Full Engagement and Systemic Improvement"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 7+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_7+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_7+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228473,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 8",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_8.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 8",
      "question": "Did the company investigate and take appropriate action in regards to the eigth human rights violation incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Investigation or Action",
        "Minimal Investigation or Response",
        "Basic Investigation and Limited Action",
        "Comprehensive Investigation and Some Engagement",
        "Full Engagement and Systemic Improvement"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 8+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_8+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_8+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228488,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 9",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_9.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 9",
      "question": "Did the company investigate and take appropriate action in regards to the ninth human rights violation incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Investigation or Action",
        "Minimal Investigation or Response",
        "Basic Investigation and Limited Action",
        "Comprehensive Investigation and Some Engagement",
        "Full Engagement and Systemic Improvement"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 9+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_9+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_9+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228499,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 1",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_1.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 1",
      "question": "Did the company engage with the affected stakeholders to provide for or cooperate in remedy(ies) in regards to the first human rights violation incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Engagement or Remedy",
        "Minimal Engagement or Insufficient Remedy",
        "Basic Engagement and Remedy",
        "Substantial Engagement and Satisfactory Remedy",
        "Full Engagement and Comprehensive Remedy"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 1+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 61,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 61,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_1+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_1+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228510,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 2",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_2.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 2",
      "question": "Did the company engage with the affected stakeholders to provide for or cooperate in remedy(ies) in regards to the first human rights violation incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Engagement or Remedy",
        "Minimal Engagement or Insufficient Remedy",
        "Basic Engagement and Remedy",
        "Substantial Engagement and Satisfactory Remedy",
        "Full Engagement and Comprehensive Remedy"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 2+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 33,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 33,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_2+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228521,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 3",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_3.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 3",
      "question": "Did the company engage with the affected stakeholders to provide for or cooperate in remedy(ies) in regards to the first human rights violation incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Engagement or Remedy",
        "Minimal Engagement or Insufficient Remedy",
        "Basic Engagement and Remedy",
        "Substantial Engagement and Satisfactory Remedy",
        "Full Engagement and Comprehensive Remedy"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 3+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 21,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_3+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_3+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228532,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 4",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_4.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 4",
      "question": "Did the company engage with the affected stakeholders to provide for or cooperate in remedy(ies) in regards to the first human rights violation incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Engagement or Remedy",
        "Minimal Engagement or Insufficient Remedy",
        "Basic Engagement and Remedy",
        "Substantial Engagement and Satisfactory Remedy",
        "Full Engagement and Comprehensive Remedy"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 4+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 18,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_4+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_4+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228543,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 5",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_5.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 5",
      "question": "Did the company engage with the affected stakeholders to provide for or cooperate in remedy(ies) in regards to the first human rights violation incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Engagement or Remedy",
        "Minimal Engagement or Insufficient Remedy",
        "Basic Engagement and Remedy",
        "Substantial Engagement and Satisfactory Remedy",
        "Full Engagement and Comprehensive Remedy"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 5+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_5+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_5+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228558,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 6",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_6.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 6",
      "question": "Did the company engage with the affected stakeholders to provide for or cooperate in remedy(ies) in regards to the first human rights violation incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Engagement or Remedy",
        "Minimal Engagement or Insufficient Remedy",
        "Basic Engagement and Remedy",
        "Substantial Engagement and Satisfactory Remedy",
        "Full Engagement and Comprehensive Remedy"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 6+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_6+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_6+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228569,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 7",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_7.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 7",
      "question": "Did the company engage with the affected stakeholders to provide for or cooperate in remedy(ies) in regards to the first human rights violation incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Engagement or Remedy",
        "Minimal Engagement or Insufficient Remedy",
        "Basic Engagement and Remedy",
        "Substantial Engagement and Satisfactory Remedy",
        "Full Engagement and Comprehensive Remedy"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 7+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_7+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_7+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228584,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 8",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_8.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 8",
      "question": "Did the company engage with the affected stakeholders to provide for or cooperate in remedy(ies) in regards to the first human rights violation incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Engagement or Remedy",
        "Minimal Engagement or Insufficient Remedy",
        "Basic Engagement and Remedy",
        "Substantial Engagement and Satisfactory Remedy",
        "Full Engagement and Comprehensive Remedy"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 8+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_8+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_8+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228595,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 9",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_9.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 9",
      "question": "Did the company engage with the affected stakeholders to provide for or cooperate in remedy(ies) in regards to the first human rights violation incident?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric is from the [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/chrb/|Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)]], part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), which has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.<br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company's response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.<br>\n<br>\nWhich allegations are included? <br>\n<br>\nRecognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that 'severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character'. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of: <br>\n<br>\na. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or <br>\n<br>\nb. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or <br>\n<br>\nc. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).",
      "methodology": "The benchmark uses publicly available information from the company's website(s), its formal financial and non-financial reporting or other public documents, plus statements such as those related to its policy commitments. These could be codes of conduct, policies, values, guidelines, FAQs and other related documents. The CHRB also considers reports, such as annual, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reports, or human rights reports if these are available, or other reports written for other purposes if these contain information applicable to the CHRB indicators. Full methodology for each sector can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2022-corporate-human-rights-benchmark/|here]].<br>\n<br>\nScoring <br>\n<br>\nIn measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. <br>\n<br>\nThe scoring will operate according to the following rules: <br>\n<br>\n- companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified will receive a proxy score for measurement theme E that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\n- companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds, will be scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator. Where there are multiple allegations, companies will be given an average score for all the allegations investigated. <br>\n<br>\nThe overall potential score for a company with at least one allegation in measurement theme E will be capped at the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. <br>\n<br>\nActual versus potential impacts <br>\n<br>\nThis measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, 'alleged' refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "No Engagement or Remedy",
        "Minimal Engagement or Insufficient Remedy",
        "Basic Engagement and Remedy",
        "Substantial Engagement and Satisfactory Remedy",
        "Full Engagement and Comprehensive Remedy"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 9+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_9+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_9+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19228685,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E - Number of serious allegations of human rights violations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_Number_of_serious_allegations_of_human_rights_violations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E - Number of serious allegations of human rights violations",
      "question": "How many serious allegations of human rights violations that meet CHRB’s threshold were identified for the company in question?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric provides an overview of the number of serious human rights violations allegations a company was found to have in the scope of the benchmark.</p>\r\n<p>This measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source. While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company’s response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Which allegations are included?</strong></p>\r\n<p>Recognising the need for companies to focus their resources on responding to severe and substantiated allegations, the following criteria will be applied to assess whether an allegation is assessed under this measurement theme. Severe impacts This measurement theme covers allegations of severe human rights impacts. The commentary to UN Guiding Principle 14 states that ‘severity of impacts will be judged by their scale, scope and irremediable character’. The Interpretive Guide to the UN Guiding Principles provides additional information about severity. Severe negative impacts are defined in the Guiding Principles as those impacts that would be greatest in terms of:</p>\r\n<p>a. scale: the gravity of the impact on the human right(s); and/or</p>\r\n<p>b. scope: the number of individuals that are or could be affected; and/or</p>\r\n<p>c. irremediability: the ease with which those impacted could be restored to their prior enjoyment of the right(s).</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Actual versus potential impacts</strong></p>\r\n<p>This measurement theme covers allegations of actual impacts; allegations regarding potential impacts that have a likelihood of occurring in the future are not addressed in this measurement theme but in other measurement themes of the benchmark. Therefore, in the context of this measurement theme, ‘alleged’ refers to impacts that the company may or may not have acknowledged (i.e. denied that it occurred, or that it has caused or contributed to the impact).</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "violations",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_The_company_has_responded_publicly_to_the_allegation.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_The_company_has_investigated_and_taken_appropriate_action.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_The_company_has_engaged_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_for_or_cooperate_in_remedy_ies.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_E_Response_to_serious_allegations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_Number_of_serious_allegations_of_human_rights_violations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244119,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 1+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_1+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 1",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 61,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 61,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_The_company_has_responded_publicly_to_the_allegation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_1+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244123,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 2+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_2+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 2",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 33,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 33,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_The_company_has_responded_publicly_to_the_allegation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_2+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244127,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 3+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_3+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 3",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 21,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_The_company_has_responded_publicly_to_the_allegation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_3+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244131,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 4+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_4+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 4",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 18,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_The_company_has_responded_publicly_to_the_allegation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_4+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244135,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 5+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_5+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 5",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_The_company_has_responded_publicly_to_the_allegation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_5+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244139,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 7+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_7+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 7",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_The_company_has_responded_publicly_to_the_allegation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_7+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244143,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 6+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_6+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 6",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_The_company_has_responded_publicly_to_the_allegation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_6+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244147,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 8+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_8+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 8",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_The_company_has_responded_publicly_to_the_allegation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_8+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244151,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 9+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_9+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1. Public response to human rights violation incident 9",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_The_company_has_responded_publicly_to_the_allegation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_Public_response_to_human_rights_violation_incident_9+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244155,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 1+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_1+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 1",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No Investigation or Action\":\"0\",\"Minimal Investigation or Response\":\"2.5\",\"Basic Investigation and Limited Action\":\"5\",\"Comprehensive Investigation and Some Engagement\":\"7.5\",\"Full Engagement and Systemic Improvement\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 61,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 61,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_The_company_has_investigated_and_taken_appropriate_action.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_1+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244159,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 2+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_2+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 2",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No Investigation or Action\":\"0\",\"Minimal Investigation or Response\":\"2.5\",\"Basic Investigation and Limited Action\":\"5\",\"Comprehensive Investigation and Some Engagement\":\"7.5\",\"Full Engagement and Systemic Improvement\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 33,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 33,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_The_company_has_investigated_and_taken_appropriate_action.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_2+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244163,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 3+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_3+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 3",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No Investigation or Action\":\"0\",\"Minimal Investigation or Response\":\"2.5\",\"Basic Investigation and Limited Action\":\"5\",\"Comprehensive Investigation and Some Engagement\":\"7.5\",\"Full Engagement and Systemic Improvement\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 21,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 21,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_The_company_has_investigated_and_taken_appropriate_action.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_3+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244167,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 4+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_4+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 4",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No Investigation or Action\":\"0\",\"Minimal Investigation or Response\":\"2.5\",\"Basic Investigation and Limited Action\":\"5\",\"Comprehensive Investigation and Some Engagement\":\"7.5\",\"Full Engagement and Systemic Improvement\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 18,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 18,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_The_company_has_investigated_and_taken_appropriate_action.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_4+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244171,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 5+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_5+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 5",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No Investigation or Action\":\"0\",\"Minimal Investigation or Response\":\"2.5\",\"Basic Investigation and Limited Action\":\"5\",\"Comprehensive Investigation and Some Engagement\":\"7.5\",\"Full Engagement and Systemic Improvement\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 12,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 12,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_The_company_has_investigated_and_taken_appropriate_action.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_5+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244175,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 6+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_6+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 6",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No Investigation or Action\":\"0\",\"Minimal Investigation or Response\":\"2.5\",\"Basic Investigation and Limited Action\":\"5\",\"Comprehensive Investigation and Some Engagement\":\"7.5\",\"Full Engagement and Systemic Improvement\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_The_company_has_investigated_and_taken_appropriate_action.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_6+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244179,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 7+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_7+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 7",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No Investigation or Action\":\"0\",\"Minimal Investigation or Response\":\"2.5\",\"Basic Investigation and Limited Action\":\"5\",\"Comprehensive Investigation and Some Engagement\":\"7.5\",\"Full Engagement and Systemic Improvement\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_The_company_has_investigated_and_taken_appropriate_action.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_7+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244183,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 8+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_8+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 8",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No Investigation or Action\":\"0\",\"Minimal Investigation or Response\":\"2.5\",\"Basic Investigation and Limited Action\":\"5\",\"Comprehensive Investigation and Some Engagement\":\"7.5\",\"Full Engagement and Systemic Improvement\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_The_company_has_investigated_and_taken_appropriate_action.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_8+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244187,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 9+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_9+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2. Investigation and appropriate action to human rights violation incident 9",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No Investigation or Action\":\"0\",\"Minimal Investigation or Response\":\"2.5\",\"Basic Investigation and Limited Action\":\"5\",\"Comprehensive Investigation and Some Engagement\":\"7.5\",\"Full Engagement and Systemic Improvement\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_The_company_has_investigated_and_taken_appropriate_action.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_Investigation_and_appropriate_action_to_human_rights_violation_incident_9+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244191,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 1+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_1+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 1",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No Engagement or Remedy\":\"0\",\"Minimal Engagement or Insufficient Remedy\":\"2.5\",\"Basic Engagement and Remedy\":\"5\",\"Substantial Engagement and Satisfactory Remedy\":\"7.5\",\"Full Engagement and Comprehensive Remedy\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_The_company_has_engaged_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_for_or_cooperate_in_remedy_ies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_1+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244195,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 2+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_2+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 2",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No Engagement or Remedy\":\"0\",\"Minimal Engagement or Insufficient Remedy\":\"2.5\",\"Basic Engagement and Remedy\":\"5\",\"Substantial Engagement and Satisfactory Remedy\":\"7.5\",\"Full Engagement and Comprehensive Remedy\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_The_company_has_engaged_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_for_or_cooperate_in_remedy_ies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_2+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244199,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 3+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_3+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 3",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No Engagement or Remedy\":\"0\",\"Minimal Engagement or Insufficient Remedy\":\"2.5\",\"Basic Engagement and Remedy\":\"5\",\"Substantial Engagement and Satisfactory Remedy\":\"7.5\",\"Full Engagement and Comprehensive Remedy\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_The_company_has_engaged_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_for_or_cooperate_in_remedy_ies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_3+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244203,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 5+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_5+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 5",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No Engagement or Remedy\":\"0\",\"Minimal Engagement or Insufficient Remedy\":\"2.5\",\"Basic Engagement and Remedy\":\"5\",\"Substantial Engagement and Satisfactory Remedy\":\"7.5\",\"Full Engagement and Comprehensive Remedy\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_The_company_has_engaged_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_for_or_cooperate_in_remedy_ies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_5+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244207,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 6+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_6+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 6",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No Engagement or Remedy\":\"0\",\"Minimal Engagement or Insufficient Remedy\":\"2.5\",\"Basic Engagement and Remedy\":\"5\",\"Substantial Engagement and Satisfactory Remedy\":\"7.5\",\"Full Engagement and Comprehensive Remedy\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_The_company_has_engaged_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_for_or_cooperate_in_remedy_ies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_6+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244211,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 7+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_7+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 7",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No Engagement or Remedy\":\"0\",\"Minimal Engagement or Insufficient Remedy\":\"2.5\",\"Basic Engagement and Remedy\":\"5\",\"Substantial Engagement and Satisfactory Remedy\":\"7.5\",\"Full Engagement and Comprehensive Remedy\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_The_company_has_engaged_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_for_or_cooperate_in_remedy_ies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_7+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244215,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 9+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_9+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 9",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No Engagement or Remedy\":\"0\",\"Minimal Engagement or Insufficient Remedy\":\"2.5\",\"Basic Engagement and Remedy\":\"5\",\"Substantial Engagement and Satisfactory Remedy\":\"7.5\",\"Full Engagement and Comprehensive Remedy\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_The_company_has_engaged_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_for_or_cooperate_in_remedy_ies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_9+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244219,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 4+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_4+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 4",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No Engagement or Remedy\":\"0\",\"Minimal Engagement or Insufficient Remedy\":\"2.5\",\"Basic Engagement and Remedy\":\"5\",\"Substantial Engagement and Satisfactory Remedy\":\"7.5\",\"Full Engagement and Comprehensive Remedy\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_The_company_has_engaged_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_for_or_cooperate_in_remedy_ies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_4+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244223,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 8+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_8+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3. Engagement with affected stakeholders to provide remedy(ies) to human rights violation incident 8",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"No Engagement or Remedy\":\"0\",\"Minimal Engagement or Insufficient Remedy\":\"2.5\",\"Basic Engagement and Remedy\":\"5\",\"Substantial Engagement and Satisfactory Remedy\":\"7.5\",\"Full Engagement and Comprehensive Remedy\":\"10\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_The_company_has_engaged_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_for_or_cooperate_in_remedy_ies.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_Engagement_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_remedy_ies_to_human_rights_violation_incident_8+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244228,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.1 The company has responded publicly to the allegation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_The_company_has_responded_publicly_to_the_allegation.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.1 The company has responded publicly to the allegation",
      "question": "What does the company score in its response to serious allegations of human rights violations?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (number_of_allegations !== 0) {\n    (CHRB_e1inc1 + CHRB_e1inc2 + CHRB_e1inc3 + CHRB_e1inc4 + CHRB_e1inc5 + CHRB_e1inc6 + CHRB_e1inc7 + CHRB_e1inc8 + CHRB_e1inc9) / number_of_allegations;\n  } else {\n    \"No serious allegations meeting CHRB thresholds\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244119",
          "name": "CHRB_e1inc1"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244123",
          "name": "CHRB_e1inc2"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244127",
          "name": "CHRB_e1inc3"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244131",
          "name": "CHRB_e1inc4"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244135",
          "name": "CHRB_e1inc5"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244143",
          "name": "CHRB_e1inc6"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244139",
          "name": "CHRB_e1inc7"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244147",
          "name": "CHRB_e1inc8"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244151",
          "name": "CHRB_e1inc9"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19228685",
          "name": "number_of_allegations"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_E_Response_to_serious_allegations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_1_The_company_has_responded_publicly_to_the_allegation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244242,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.2 The company has investigated and taken appropriate action",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_The_company_has_investigated_and_taken_appropriate_action.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.2 The company has investigated and taken appropriate action",
      "question": "What does the company score on taking appropriate action when serious incidents of human rights violations occur?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The company has engaged with affected stakeholders to identify the causes of the impacts alleged. The company also reviewed and improved its management systems, informed by the views of affected stakeholders and/or their legitimate representatives, to prevent similar impacts from occurring in the future.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (number_of_allegations !== 0) {\n    (CHRB_e2inc1 + CHRB_e2inc2 + CHRB_e2inc3 + CHRB_e2inc4 + CHRB_e2inc5 + CHRB_e2inc6 + CHRB_e2inc7 + CHRB_e2inc8 + CHRB_e2inc9) / number_of_allegations;\n  } else {\n    \"No serious allegations meeting CHRB thresholds\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244155",
          "name": "CHRB_e2inc1"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244159",
          "name": "CHRB_e2inc2"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244163",
          "name": "CHRB_e2inc3"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244167",
          "name": "CHRB_e2inc4"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244171",
          "name": "CHRB_e2inc5"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244175",
          "name": "CHRB_e2inc6"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244179",
          "name": "CHRB_e2inc7"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244183",
          "name": "CHRB_e2inc8"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244187",
          "name": "CHRB_e2inc9"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19228685",
          "name": "number_of_allegations"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_E_Response_to_serious_allegations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_2_The_company_has_investigated_and_taken_appropriate_action+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244257,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB E.3 The company has engaged with affected stakeholders to provide for or cooperate in remedy(ies)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_The_company_has_engaged_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_for_or_cooperate_in_remedy_ies.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB E.3 The company has engaged with affected stakeholders to provide for or cooperate in remedy(ies)",
      "question": "What does the company score on remedies in regards to human rights violation incidents? ",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (number_of_allegations !== 0) {\n    (CHRB_e3inc1 + CHRB_e3inc2 + CHRB_e3inc3 + CHRB_e3inc4 + CHRB_e3inc5 + CHRB_e3inc6 + CHRB_e3inc7 + CHRB_e3inc8 + CHRB_e3inc9) / number_of_allegations;\n  } else {\n    \"No serious allegations meeting CHRB thresholds\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244191",
          "name": "CHRB_e3inc1"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244195",
          "name": "CHRB_e3inc2"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244199",
          "name": "CHRB_e3inc3"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244219",
          "name": "CHRB_e3inc4"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244203",
          "name": "CHRB_e3inc5"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244207",
          "name": "CHRB_e3inc6"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244211",
          "name": "CHRB_e3inc7"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244223",
          "name": "CHRB_e3inc8"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "0",
          "metric": "~19244215",
          "name": "CHRB_e3inc9"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19228685",
          "name": "number_of_allegations"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_E_Response_to_serious_allegations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_E_3_The_company_has_engaged_with_affected_stakeholders_to_provide_for_or_cooperate_in_remedy_ies+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244267,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB Theme E - Response to serious allegations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_E_Response_to_serious_allegations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB Theme E - Response to serious allegations",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source.</p>\r\n<p>While previous measurement themes focused on the specific policies, systems, processes, and practices the company puts in place to proactively avoid adverse impacts, indicators in this measurement theme seek to assess a company’s response to an allegation that an impact has occurred. The response to serious allegations measurement theme does not seek to assess the allegation itself.</p>\r\n<p>This measurement theme is broken down into the following indicators:</p>\r\n<p>E.1 The company has responded publicly to the allegation</p>\r\n<p>E.2 The company has investigated and taken appropriate action</p>\r\n<p>E.3 The company has engaged with affected stakeholders to provide for or cooperate in remedy(ies)</p>\r\n<p>In measurement theme E, companies against which no serious allegations meeting the CHRB thresholds are identified receive a proxy score that is the average of their scores in the other measurement themes. Companies where allegation(s) are found to meet the CHRB thresholds are scored across indicators E.1, E.2 and E.3, with a maximum of two points for each indicator.</p>",
      "methodology": "",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Conversion for Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB Theme E - Response to serious allegations+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (number_of_incidents === 0) {\n    (theme_a + theme_b + theme_c + theme_d) / 4;\n  } else {\n    0.25 * e1 + 0.25 * e2 + 0.5 * e3;\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244228",
          "name": "e1"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244242",
          "name": "e2"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244257",
          "name": "e3"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19228685",
          "name": "number_of_incidents"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19017215",
          "name": "theme_a"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19152549",
          "name": "theme_b"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19170680",
          "name": "theme_c"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246502",
          "name": "theme_d"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_E_Response_to_serious_allegations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_E_Response_to_serious_allegations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244275,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB Theme E - Response to serious allegations+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_E_Response_to_serious_allegations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB Theme E - Response to serious allegations",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>This measurement theme focuses on responses to serious allegations of negative impacts a company may be alleged or reported to be responsible for by an external source.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Conversion for Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Total_Corporate_Human_Rights_Benchmark_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_E_Response_to_serious_allegations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244287,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Total Corporate Human Rights Benchmark Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Total_Corporate_Human_Rights_Benchmark_Score.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Total Corporate Human Rights Benchmark Score",
      "question": "What is the total company score achieved in the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>The <strong>Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB)</strong>, part of the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), has been assessing the human rights disclosures of some of the largest global companies since 2017. By ranking these companies on their policies, processes and practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations, the CHRB aims to create a race to the top through which companies strive to fulfil their responsibility to respect the human rights of the individuals and communities that they impact.</p>\r\n<p><strong>The CHRB measurement themes and indicators</strong></p>\r\n<p> The CHRB methodology is composed of five measurement themes, each containing a series of indicators focusing on different aspects of how a business seeks to respect human rights across its own operations and supply chain.</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Measurement theme A</strong> focuses on governance and policy commitments.</li>\r\n<li><strong>Measurement theme B</strong> focuses on embedding respect for human rights and conducting human rights due diligence.</li>\r\n<li><strong>Measurement theme C</strong> focuses on grievance mechanisms and access to remedy.</li>\r\n<li><strong>Measurement theme D</strong> focuses on specific practices to prevent human rights impacts in each industry.</li>\r\n<li><strong>Measurement theme E</strong> focuses on responses to allegations of serious negative impacts on human rights.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>These indicators are grounded in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and other international human rights standards, with additional sector-specific requirements applied to some indicators.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact & Support Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Conversion for Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19017215",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19152549",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19170680",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246502",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244275",
          "weight": 20
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Total_Corporate_Human_Rights_Benchmark_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244313,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AG.a.S1 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples' rights (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_a_S1_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.AG.a.S1 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples' rights (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all the requirements on CHRB A.1.3.AG.a.S1 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples' rights?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AG.a.S1 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples' rights (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var accepted_options, all,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_options = [\"Commitment to respect land ownership/natural resources as in VGGT OR Commitment to respect land ownership/natural resources as in IFC Performance Standards\", \"Commitment to respect indigenous rights or ILO No.169 or UN Declaration\", \"Expects suppliers to make these commitments\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (all(accepted_options, CHRB_a13as1)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_a13as1, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18021914",
          "name": "CHRB_a13as1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_a_S1_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_a_S1_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244323,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AG.a.S1 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples' rights (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_a_S1_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.AG.a.S1 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples' rights (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_a_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_a_S1_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244328,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AG.a.S2 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples' rights (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_a_S2_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.AG.a.S2 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples' rights (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on CHRB A.1.3.AG.a.S2 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples' rights?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AG.a.S2 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples' rights (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var accepted_options, all,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_options = [\"Commitment to obtain FPIC or zero tolerance to land grabbing\", \"Commitment to respect the right to water\", \"Expects suppliers to make these commitments\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (all(accepted_options, CHRB_a13as2)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_a13as2, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18021926",
          "name": "CHRB_a13as2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_a_S2_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_a_S2_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244338,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AG.a.S2 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples' rights (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_a_S2_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.AG.a.S2 Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples' rights (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_a_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_a_S2_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244343,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.a Commitment to respect human rights particularly relevant to the sector: Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples' rights (Food and agricultural products sector)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_a_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.a Commitment to respect human rights particularly relevant to the sector: Land, natural resources and indigenous peoples' rights (Food and agricultural products sector)",
      "question": "What does the company score to public commitments to respecting, and ensures its business relationships respect, the human rights of particular relevance to communities' livelihoods and health, including the right to water and the ownership or use of land and natural resources?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 12; UNGPRF A1.2; GRI 103-2</em></p>\r\n<p>The company publicly commits to respecting, and ensures its business relationships respect, the human rights of particular relevance to communities' livelihoods and health, including the right to water and the ownership or use of land and natural resources.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244323",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244338",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_a_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Land_natural_resources_and_indigenous_peoples_rights_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244349,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AG.b.S1 Vulnerable groups+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_b_S1_Vulnerable_groups+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.AG.b.S1 Vulnerable groups",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Commitment to women's rights OR Commitment to children's rights OR Commitment to migrant worker's rights\":\"5\",\"Expects suppliers to respect at least one of these rights\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_b_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Security_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_b_S1_Vulnerable_groups+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244353,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AG.b.S2 Vulnerable groups+Vasiliki Gkatziaki",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_b_S2_Vulnerable_groups+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.AG.b.S2 Vulnerable groups",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Commitment refers to CEDAW/Women's Empowerment Principles OR Commitment refers to Child Rights Convention/Business Principles OR Commitment refers to Convention on migrant workers\":\"5\",\"Expects suppliers to respect these rights\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_b_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Security_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AG_b_S2_Vulnerable_groups+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244358,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.b Commitment to respect human rights particularly relevant to the sector: Security (Food and agricultural products sector)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_b_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Security_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.b Commitment to respect human rights particularly relevant to the sector: Security (Food and agricultural products sector)",
      "question": "What does the company score on public commitments to respecting, and ensures that its business relationships respect, the human rights of particular relevance to communities' livelihoods, security and health, including fundamental humanitarian norms such as protections for civilians and other protected persons when operating in conflict-affected areas?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 12; UNGPRF A1.2; GRI 103-2</em></p>\r\n<p>The company publicly commits to respecting, and ensures that its business relationships respect, the human rights of individuals belonging to specific groups or populations that require particular attention (for example, women, children, indigenous peoples, minorities, persons with disabilities, or migrant workers and their families), where they may be at heightened risk of becoming vulnerable or marginalised if adversely impacted by the company’s activities or its business relationships. </p>\r\n<p>Note: General commitments to non-discrimination are covered under A.1.1. and A.1.2 and therefore not considered in this indicator; This indicator is looking for more specific commitments to particular groups.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244349",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244353",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_b_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Security_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244364,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AP.S1 Vulnerable groups+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AP_S1_Vulnerable_groups+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.AP.S1 Vulnerable groups",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Commitment to women's rights OR Commitment to children's rights OR Commitment to migrant worker's rights\":\"5\",\"Expects suppliers to respect these rights\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Vulnerable_groups_Apparel_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AP_S1_Vulnerable_groups+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244368,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.AP.S2 Vulnerable groups+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AP_S2_Vulnerable_groups+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.AP.S2 Vulnerable groups",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Commitment refers to CEDAW/Women's Empowerment Principles OR Commitment refers to Child Rights Convention/Business Principles OR Commitment refers to Convention on migrant workers\":\"5\",\"Expects suppliers to respect these rights\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Vulnerable_groups_Apparel_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_AP_S2_Vulnerable_groups+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244373,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3 Commitment to respect human rights particularly relevant to the sector: Vulnerable groups (Apparel sector)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Vulnerable_groups_Apparel_sector.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3 Commitment to respect human rights particularly relevant to the sector: Vulnerable groups (Apparel sector)",
      "question": "What does the company score to public commitments to respecting, and ensures that its business relationships respect, the human rights of individuals belonging to specific groups or populations that require particular attention?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 12; UNGPRF A1.2; GRI 103-2</em></p>\r\n<p>The company publicly commits to respecting, and ensures that its business relationships respect, the human rights of individuals belonging to specific groups or populations that require particular attention (for example, women, children, indigenous peoples, minorities, persons with disabilities, or migrant workers and their families), where they may be at heightened risk of becoming vulnerable or marginalised if adversely impacted by the company’s activities or its business relationships. </p>\r\n<p>Note: General commitments to non-discrimination are covered under A.1.1. and A.1.2 and therefore not considered in this indicator; This indicator is looking for more specific commitments to particular groups.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244364",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244368",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Vulnerable_groups_Apparel_sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244380,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.ICT.a.S1 Responsible sourcing of minerals (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_a_S1_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.ICT.a.S1 Responsible sourcing of minerals (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on CHRB A.1.3.ICT.a.S1 Responsible sourcing of minerals?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.ICT.a.S1 Responsible sourcing of minerals (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var accepted_values, all,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  accepted_values = [\"Commitment to responsible mineral sourcing\", \"Commitment to following OECD Guidance on 3GT\", \"Requires suppliers to commit to responsible mineral sourcing\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (all(accepted_values, CHRB_a13as1)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_a13as1, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022040",
          "name": "CHRB_a13as1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_a_S1_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_a_S1_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244390,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.ICT.a.S1 Responsible sourcing of minerals (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_a_S1_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.ICT.a.S1 Responsible sourcing of minerals (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_a_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_ICT_manufacturing_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_a_S1_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244394,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.ICT.a.S2 Responsible sourcing of minerals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_a_S2_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.ICT.a.S2 Responsible sourcing of minerals",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Commitment to OECD Guidance covers all minerals\":\"5\",\"Expects suppliers to make similar requirements of their suppliers\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_a_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_ICT_manufacturing_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_a_S2_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244399,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.a Commitment to respect human rights particularly relevant to the sector: Responsible sourcing of minerals (ICT manufacturing sector)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_a_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_ICT_manufacturing_sector.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.a Commitment to respect human rights particularly relevant to the sector: Responsible sourcing of minerals (ICT manufacturing sector)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: GRI 103-2; OECD Guidance; Chinese Guidance</em></p>\r\n<p>The company publicly commits to the responsible sourcing of minerals from conflict- affected and high-risk areas, in line with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict- Affected and High-Risk Areas, including its current supplements on tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold (3TG) (3rd edition) (the OECD Guidance). The OECD Guidance Annex II includes the Model Supply Chain Policy for a Responsible Global Supply Chain of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High- Risk Areas that includes standards against which due diligence is to be conducted. For companies headquartered in mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau or controlled or owned by mainland Chinese nationals, as an alternative, the company publicly commits to the responsible sourcing of minerals from conflict- affected and high-risk areas, in line with the \"Chinese Due Diligence Guidelines for Responsible Mineral Supply Chains\" (2015) (Chinese Guidance), which are consistent with the OECD Guidance. </p>\r\n<p>Note: It is assumed that references to the OECD Guidance commit the company to following the OECD Guidance for conflict- affected and high-risk areas unless a more limited (geographic or other) scope is indicated in company documents or reporting. This assumption applies to all references to the OECD Guidance. Therefore, if a more limited scope is indicated, companies will not score points in this indicator A.1.3.a where the OECD Guidance is referred to, nor in the indicators on the application of the OECD Guidance covered in measurement theme D below.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244394",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244390",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_a_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_ICT_manufacturing_sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244405,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.ICT.b.S1 Vulnerable groups+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_b_S1_Vulnerable_groups+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.ICT.b.S1 Vulnerable groups",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Commitment to women's rights OR Commitment to children's rights OR Commitment to migrant worker's rights\":\"5\",\"Expects suppliers to respect at least one of these rights\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_b_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Vulnerable_groups_ICT_manufacturing_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_b_S1_Vulnerable_groups+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244409,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.ICT.b.S2 Vulnerable groups+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_b_S2_Vulnerable_groups+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.ICT.b.S2 Vulnerable groups",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Commitment refers to CEDAW/Women's Empowerment Principles OR Commitment refers to Child Rights Convention/Business Principles OR Commitment refers to Convention on migrant workers\":\"5\",\"Expects suppliers to respect these rights\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_b_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Vulnerable_groups_ICT_manufacturing_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_ICT_b_S2_Vulnerable_groups+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244418,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3.b Commitment to respect human rights particularly relevant to the sector: Vulnerable groups (ICT manufacturing sector))",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_b_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Vulnerable_groups_ICT_manufacturing_sector.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3.b Commitment to respect human rights particularly relevant to the sector: Vulnerable groups (ICT manufacturing sector))",
      "question": "What does the company score on public commitments to respecting, and ensures that its business relationships respect, the human rights of individuals belonging to specific groups or populations that require particular attention?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 12; UNGPRF A1.2; GRI 103-2</em></p>\r\n<p>The company publicly commits to respecting, and ensures that its business relationships respect, the human rights of individuals belonging to specific groups or populations that require particular attention (for example, women, children, indigenous peoples, minorities, persons with disabilities, or migrant workers and their families), where they may be at heightened risk of becoming vulnerable or marginalised if adversely impacted by the company's activities or its business relationships. </p>\r\n<p>Note: General commitments to non-discrimination are covered under A.1.1. and A.1.2 and therefore not considered in this indicator; This indicator is looking for more specific commitments to particular groups.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244405",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244409",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_b_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights_particularly_relevant_to_the_sector_Vulnerable_groups_ICT_manufacturing_sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244465,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3 Commitment to respect human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3 Commitment to respect human rights",
      "question": "What does the company score on commitments to respect human rights?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The calculation of indicator A.1.3 varies by sector, and a company may belong to multiple sectors. To derive the final score for this indicator, we compute the average of these scores.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3 Commitment to respect human rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var a13a, a13b, score;\n\n  a13a = [a13a_ex, a13a_ag, a13a_ict, a13_ap].filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"not in sector\";\n  });\n\n  a13b = [a13b_ex, a13b_ag, a13b_ict, a13_ap].filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"not in sector\";\n  });\n\n  score = function(array) {\n    var total;\n    if (array.length === 0) {\n      return 0;\n    }\n    total = array.reduce((function(sum, element) {\n      return sum + element;\n    }), 0);\n    return total / array.length;\n  };\n\n  (score(a13a) + score(a13b)) / 2;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "not in sector",
          "metric": "~18832115",
          "name": "a13a_ex"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "not in sector",
          "metric": "~19244343",
          "name": "a13a_ag"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "not in sector",
          "metric": "~19244399",
          "name": "a13a_ict"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "not in sector",
          "metric": "~18832142",
          "name": "a13b_ex"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "not in sector",
          "metric": "~19244358",
          "name": "a13b_ag"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "not in sector",
          "metric": "~19244418",
          "name": "a13b_ict"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "not in sector",
          "metric": "~19244373",
          "name": "a13_ap"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244475,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.3 Commitment to respect human rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.3 Commitment to respect human rights",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_A_1_Policy_commitments.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_3_Commitment_to_respect_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244479,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.1.b.S1 Living wage (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_1_b_S1_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.1.b.S1 Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on living wage in supplier codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on living wage\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_1_b_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_1_b_S1_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244483,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.1.b.S2 Living wage (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_1_b_S2_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.1.b.S2 Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment of scope of payment below living wage in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_1_b_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_1_b_S2_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244488,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.1.b Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_1_b_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.1.b Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on living wages in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7, HRIB, 8.2.3, ETI, 5; FWF, 5; SA8000; GLWC; SA8000, IV.8.1</em></p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers pay their workers a living wage or discloses a time bound target for requiring suppliers to do so. The company assess the number of workers affected by any payment below living wages in the supply chain and demonstrates progress. There are numerous definitions of living wage, but the core concept is to provide a decent living for a worker and his or her family (in line with Article 7 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights) based on a regular work week not including overtime hours. A living wage is sufficient to cover food, water, clothing, transport, education, health care and other essential needs for workers and their officially entitled dependents and provide some discretionary income. Workers also receive equal pay for equal work.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244479",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244483",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_ICT_D4_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_ICT_manufacturing_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_1_b_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244494,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.2.S1 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_2_S1_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.2.S1 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Describes practices to avoid price or short notice requirements that undermine HRs OR Describes practices to pay suppliers in line with agreed timeframes\":\"5\",\"Reviews own operations to mitigate negative impact of purchasing practices\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_2_S1_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244499,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on CHRB D.4.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var CHRB_d42s2,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  CHRB_d42s2 = CHRB_d42s2.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Meets all requirements under score 1\";\n  });\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d42s2, \"None of the above\") >= 0 || CHRB_d42s2.length === 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (CHRB_d42s1 === 10) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18024036",
          "name": "CHRB_d42s2"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244494",
          "name": "CHRB_d42s1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244509,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244514,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "question": "What does the company score on aligning purchasing decisions with human rights?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 16; UNGPRF C4.2: HRIB, 8.1.1; FLA, I.ER.24 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company ensures coherence between its purchasing policies and practices and its human rights commitment(s)and pays suppliers in line with agreed timeframes and for the amount agreed in the payment terms as well as communicate production needs to suppliers ahead of time. The company also mitigates negative human rights impacts of its purchasing practices in planning, merchandising and costing.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244494",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244509",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_ICT_D4_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_ICT_manufacturing_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244520,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.3.S1 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_3_S1_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.3.S1 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_3_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_3_S1_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244524,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.3.S2 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_3_S2_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.3.S2 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Discloses names and locations of significant parts of supply chain and how significance was defined\":\"5\",\"Discloses direct or indirect suppliers involved in higher-risk activities\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_3_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_3_S2_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244529,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.3 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_3_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.3 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "question": "What does the company score on mapping and disclosing the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: GRI 102-9</em></p>\r\n<p>The company maps its suppliers and discloses its mapping publicly. In order to gain greater visibility of the supply chain and reduce human rights risks, this process should include identifying higher-risk activities, geographies and products, and disclosing the names and specific locations of suppliers of the most significant parts of the company's supply chain. This information should be provided for stakeholders in a useable format (e.g. downloadable, machine-readable).</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244520",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244524",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_ICT_D4_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_ICT_manufacturing_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_3_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244535,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.4.b.S1 Age verification and corrective actions\n (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_4_b_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.4.b.S1 Age verification and corrective actions\n (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on child labour in supplier codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on eliminating child labour\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_4_b_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_4_b_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244539,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.4.b.S2 Age verification and corrective actions\n (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_4_b_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.4.b.S2 Age verification and corrective actions\n (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment of scope of child labour in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_4_b_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_4_b_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244544,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.4.b Prohibition of child labour: Age verification and corrective actions (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_4_b_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.4.b Prohibition of child labour: Age verification and corrective actions (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "How does the company score on prohibition of child labour?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: CRC, Art. 32; ILO, No. 138 &amp; No. 182; CRBP; HRIB 8.2.7; FLA V.CL.2, V.CL.4 and V.CL.8; ETI, 4.2 and 4.4; FWF, 3; SA8000; GRI 408-1; SA8000 IV.1.2</em></p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers and third-party recruitment services verify the age of workers recruited to ensure that they comply with the ILO requirements for minimum age for admission to employment and are therefore entitled to work (see table below for relevant definitions). If the company learns that it has child labour in its supply chain it requires that its supplier(s) enrol the child/ children in a remediation/education programme, rather than just dismissing them from employment. The objective is to ensure that children are not pushed into more dangerous survival strategies. If young workers are found to be involved in hazardous work, the company requires that its supplier(s) remove the young workers immediately from the situation and provide alternative work that is not hazardous and is age-appropriate and therefore not child labour. The objective is to ensure that no workers under the age of 18 are required to perform hazardous work.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244535",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244539",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_ICT_D4_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_ICT_manufacturing_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_4_b_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244550,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.b.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_b_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.5.b.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on debt/fees in supplier codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on debt/fees for job seekers/workers\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_b_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_b_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244554,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.b.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_b_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.5.b.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment scope of payment of recruitment fees in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_b_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_b_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244559,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.b Prohibition of forced labour: Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_b_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.5.b Prohibition of forced labour: Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on prohibition of forced labour in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICCPR, Art. 8; ILO, No. 29 &amp; No. 105; ILO 2019; HRIB, 8.2.6; ETI 1.2; FLA IV.F.7.1 and IV.F.11; SA8000; GRI 409-1; SA8000 IV.2.1-3 and IV.8.2-3 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company prohibits recruitment fees or costs being charged to workers by suppliers or any third-party recruitment intermediaries and works with suppliers to ensure full reimbursement to workers if they have been required to pay any fees and related costs during recruitment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244550",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244554",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_b_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244565,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.d.S1 Wage practices (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_d_S1_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.5.d.S1 Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on paying in full and on time in supplier codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on paying workers regularly in full and on time\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_d_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_d_S1_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244569,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.d.S2 Wage practices (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_d_S2_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.5.d.S2 Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment scope of failure to pay workers in full and on time in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_d_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_d_S2_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244574,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.d Prohibition of forced labour: Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_d_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.5.d Prohibition of forced labour: Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on wage practices in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: IFLA IV.F.2.3 and IV.F.12</em></p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers pay workers regularly, in full, and on time in a recognised currency, and do not withhold wages or expenses that should be covered by the suppliers.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244565",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244569",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_d_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244580,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.f.S1 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_f_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.5.f.S1 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on free movement in supplier codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes working with suppliers on free movement of workers\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_f_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_f_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244584,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.f.S2 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_f_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.5.f.S2 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment of scope of restriction of movement in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_f_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_f_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244589,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5.f Prohibition of forced labour: Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_f_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.5.f Prohibition of forced labour: Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on wage practices in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICCPR, Art. 12; ILO, No. 29 &amp; No. 105; ILO 2019; HRIB 8.2.6; ETI 1.2; FLA IV.F.4, IV.F.5, IV.F.6, IV.F.9 and IV.F.10; SA8000; GRI 409-1; SA8000 IV.2.4</em></p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers do not restrict workers' mobility, including through the retention of passports, other personal identification or travel documents or bank payment cards or similar arrangements workers use for accessing wages. The supplier also refrains from requiring workers to use company provided accommodation.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244580",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244584",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_f_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244595,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.6.b.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_6_b_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.6.b.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on FoA/CB in suppliers codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on FoA/CB\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_6_b_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_6_b_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244599,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.6.b.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_6_b_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.6.b.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment of scope of restriction of FoA/CB in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_6_b_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_6_b_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244604,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.6.b Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_6_b_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.6.b Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on freedom of association and collective bargaining in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7, ICCPR, Art. 22; ILO, No. 87 &amp; No. 98; HRIB 2.6; ETI, 2; FLA VI.FOA.1, VI.FOA.3 and VI.FOA.4; FWF, 4; SA8000; GRI 407-1; SA8000 IV.4</p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers respect the right of all workers to form and join a trade union of their choice (or equivalent worker bodies where the rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining are restricted under law) and to bargain collectively. In addition, the company requires that its suppliers provide workers' representatives with appropriate facilities to assist in the development of effective collective bargaining agreement(s). The company also requires that its suppliers prohibit intimidation, harassment, retaliation and violence against trade union members and trade union representatives.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244595",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244599",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_ICT_D4_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_ICT_manufacturing_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_6_b_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244619,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on CHRB D.4.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var all, requirements,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  requirements = [\"Requirements on H&S in supplier codes and contracts\", \"Discloses injury rate or lost days in supply chain in last reporting period\", \"Discloses fatalities for workers in supply chain in last reporting period\", \"Discloses occupational disease rate in supply chain in last reporting period\"];\n\n  all = function(target, source) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = target.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = target[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(source, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d47bs1, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (all(requirements, CHRB_d47bs1)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18024193",
          "name": "CHRB_d47bs1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244632,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244637,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on CHRB D.4.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var all, requirements,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  requirements = [\"Describes work with suppliers of H&S\", \"Assessment of scope of H&S issues in supply chain\", \"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\"];\n\n  all = function(target, source) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = target.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = target[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(source, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d47bs2, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (all(requirements, CHRB_d47bs2)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18024205",
          "name": "CHRB_d47bs2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244647,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244655,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.7.b Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.7.b Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7; HRIB 8.2.1; FLA VII.HSE.30; SA8000; GRI 403-9; SA8000 IV.3.5</p>\r\n<p>The company discloses quantitative information on health and safety related to suppliers' workers, namely: injury rate, fatality rate, lost days (or near miss frequency rate), and occupational disease rate.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244632",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244647",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_ICT_D4_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_ICT_manufacturing_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_7_b_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244661,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.8.b.S1 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_8_b_S1_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.8.b.S1 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on women's rights in contracts/codes with suppliers\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on women's rights\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_8_b_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_8_b_S1_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244665,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.8.b.S2 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_8_b_S2_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.8.b.S2 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment of scope of women's rights issues in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_8_b_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_8_b_S2_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244670,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.8.b Women's rights (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_8_b_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.8.b Women's rights (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on women's rights in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Sources: CEDAW; ILO, No. 100 &amp; No. 111; WEP; HRIB, 8.2.5; ETI, 7 and 9;FLA II.ND.8, VII.HSE.11, VII.HSE.12 and VIII.HOW.4; FWF, 2; SA8000; GRI 405-2; SA8000 IV.5</p>\r\n<p>The company recognises the relevance of women's rights for the sector, given the prevalence of women workers and the different dimensions of inequality they often face. The company requires that its suppliers have measures in place to implement its policy commitment to eliminate discrimination against women through providing equal pay for equal work and measures to ensure equal opportunities throughout all levels of employment. These may include setting up women’s committees that report to management to address and resolve issues, gender-equality training, and eliminating working or employment conditions linked to marital status or family responsibilities or the absence of pregnancy. In addition, the company requires that its suppliers have measures in place to eliminate health and safety concerns that are particularly prevalent among women workers (e.g., sexual harassment, physical security and protection and accommodation of pregnant and nursing workers).</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244661",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244665",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_ICT_D4_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_ICT_manufacturing_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_8_b_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244766,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.9.b.S1 Working hours (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_9_b_S1_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.9.b.S1 Working hours (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on working hours in codes/contracts with suppliers\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on working hours\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_9_b_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_9_b_S1_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244770,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.9.b.S2 Working hours (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_9_b_S2_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.9.b.S2 Working hours (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assesment of scope of excessive working hours in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_9_b_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_9_b_S2_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244783,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.9.b Working hours (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_9_b_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.9.b Working hours (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on working hours in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7; ILO, No. 1, 14 &amp; 106; HRIB, 8.2.2; FLA VIII.HOW Workplace Code Provisions FLA VIII.HOW.3 FLA VIII.HOW.8; ETI, 6; FWF, 6; SA8000 IV.7</p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers respect applicable international standards concerning maximum working hours and minimum breaks and rest periods. The company also assesses the ability of suppliers to comply with its commitments to respect working hours and minimum breaks and rest periods when allocating work or setting targets in its purchasing orders.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244766",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244770",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_ICT_D4_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_ICT_manufacturing_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_9_b_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244803,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.a.S2 Arrangements with suppliers and smelters/refiners\n in the mineral resource supply chains+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_a_S2_Arrangements_with_suppliers_and_smelters_refiners_in_the_mineral_resource_supply_chains+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.10.a.S2 Arrangements with suppliers and smelters/refiners\n in the mineral resource supply chains",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirement to disclose smelter/refiner information in contracts/codes with suppliers\":\"5\",\"Requirement on suppliers covers all minerals\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_a_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Arrangements_with_suppliers_and_smelters_refiners_in_the_mineral_resource_supply_chains.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_a_S2_Arrangements_with_suppliers_and_smelters_refiners_in_the_mineral_resource_supply_chains+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244807,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.a.S1 Arrangements with suppliers and smelters/refiners\n in the mineral resource supply chains+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_a_S1_Arrangements_with_suppliers_and_smelters_refiners_in_the_mineral_resource_supply_chains+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.10.a.S1 Arrangements with suppliers and smelters/refiners\n in the mineral resource supply chains",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirement on OECD Guidance aligned due diligence in contracts/codes with suppliers\":\"5\",\"Describes work with smelters/refiners and suppliers on due diligence\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_a_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Arrangements_with_suppliers_and_smelters_refiners_in_the_mineral_resource_supply_chains.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_a_S1_Arrangements_with_suppliers_and_smelters_refiners_in_the_mineral_resource_supply_chains+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244812,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.a Responsible sourcing of minerals: Arrangements with suppliers and smelters/refiners in the mineral resource supply chains",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_a_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Arrangements_with_suppliers_and_smelters_refiners_in_the_mineral_resource_supply_chains.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.10.a Responsible sourcing of minerals: Arrangements with suppliers and smelters/refiners in the mineral resource supply chains",
      "question": "What does the company score on arrangements with suppliers and smelters/refiners in the mineral resource supply chains?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244807",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244803",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_a_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Arrangements_with_suppliers_and_smelters_refiners_in_the_mineral_resource_supply_chains+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244817,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.b.S1 Risk identification and responses in mineral supply\n chains+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_b_S1_Risk_identification_and_responses_in_mineral_supply_chains+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.10.b.S1 Risk identification and responses in mineral supply\n chains",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Describes risk identification and disclosure in line with OECD Guidance\":\"5\",\"Describes process to identify smelters/refiners\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_b_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Risk_identification_in_mineral_supply_chains.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_b_S1_Risk_identification_and_responses_in_mineral_supply_chains+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244821,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.b.S2 Risk identification and responses in mineral supply\n chains+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_b_S2_Risk_identification_and_responses_in_mineral_supply_chains+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.10.b.S2 Risk identification and responses in mineral supply\n chains",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Discloses smelters/refiners assessed in line with OECD Guidance\":\"5\",\"Risk identification and disclosure covers all minerals\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_b_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Risk_identification_in_mineral_supply_chains.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_b_S2_Risk_identification_and_responses_in_mineral_supply_chains+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244826,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.b Responsible sourcing of minerals: Risk identification in mineral supply chains",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_b_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Risk_identification_in_mineral_supply_chains.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.10.b Responsible sourcing of minerals: Risk identification in mineral supply chains",
      "question": "What does the company score on risk identification in mineral supply chains?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: OECD Guidance; Chinese Guidance</em></p>\r\n<p>The company actively identifies and assesses risks and impacts in its mineral supply chain, including approaches to focus its risk assessments on those minerals and suppliers that raise red flags as identified in the OECD Guidance. These processes include identifying smelters/refiners in its supply chain and assessing their due diligence practices against the OECD Guidance, including by reviewing evidence on the due diligence practices of the smelters/refiners, reviewing information generated by the smelters’/ refiners’ assessment teams and reviewing the smelters’/refiners’ publicly available due diligence reporting. It also looks at whether the smelters/refiners participate in an sector scheme, or have undergone an independent third- party audit assessment. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> It is assumed that references to the OECD Guidance commit the company to following the OECD Guidance for conflict affected and high-risk areas unless a more limited (geographic or other) scope is indicated in company documents or reporting. This assumption applies to all references to the OECD Guidance. Therefore, if a more limited scope is indicated, companies will not score points in this section on the application of the OECD Guidance.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244817",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244821",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_b_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Risk_identification_in_mineral_supply_chains+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244832,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.c.S2 Reporting on responsible sourcing of minerals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_c_S2_Reporting_on_responsible_sourcing_of_minerals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.10.c.S2 Reporting on responsible sourcing of minerals",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Describes engagement with suppliers/stakeholders on risk management strategy\":\"5\",\"Risk management and response processes cover all minerals\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_c_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Risk_management_in_the_mineral_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_c_S2_Reporting_on_responsible_sourcing_of_minerals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244841,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.c.S1 Reporting on responsible sourcing of minerals (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_c_S1_Reporting_on_responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.10.c.S1 Reporting on responsible sourcing of minerals (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulful all requirements on CHRB D.4.10.c.S1 Reporting on responsible sourcing of minerals?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.c.S1 Reporting on responsible sourcing of minerals (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var all, requirements,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  requirements = [\"Describes risk management system for supply chain\", \"Describes process of monitoring risk prevention/mitigation system\", \"Discloses improvements in risk prevention/mitigation system\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (all(requirements, CHRB_d410cs1)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d410cs1, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18024310",
          "name": "CHRB_d410cs1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_c_S1_Reporting_on_responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_c_S1_Reporting_on_responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244851,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.c.S1 Reporting on responsible sourcing of minerals (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_c_S1_Reporting_on_responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.10.c.S1 Reporting on responsible sourcing of minerals (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_c_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Risk_management_in_the_mineral_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_c_S1_Reporting_on_responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19244856,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10.c Responsible sourcing of minerals: Risk management in the mineral supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_c_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Risk_management_in_the_mineral_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.10.c Responsible sourcing of minerals: Risk management in the mineral supply chain",
      "question": "What does the company score on risk management in the mineral supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244851",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244832",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_c_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals_Risk_management_in_the_mineral_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245026,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB Theme D (ICT- D4) - Performance: Company Human Rights Practices (ICT manufacturing sector)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_ICT_D4_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_ICT_manufacturing_sector.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB Theme D (ICT- D4) - Performance: Company Human Rights Practices (ICT manufacturing sector)",
      "question": "What does the company score on human rights practices?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This measurement theme focuses on selected human rights related practices specific to each sector. The indicators seek to assess the actual practices occurring within companies in order to implement key enablers and business processes and to prevent specific impacts on human rights particularly at risk of occurring given the sector in question. </p>\r\n<p>Many of these interconnect with the other CHRB measurement themes and company approaches to policy commitments and governance, embedding respect for human rights in culture and management systems, undertaking human rights due diligence or implementing remediation processes. </p>\r\n<p>However, these indicators aid the inter- and intra-comparative benefits of the benchmark. Complemented by the CHRB performance indicators on responses to serious allegations (measurement theme E), these indicators seek to achieve a more comprehensive overall proxy measure for the human rights performance of a company being benchmarked. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>There are 23 indicators for the ICT Manufacturing companies in Theme D, with a variety of single, half, third and sixth weightings. See Annex 1 for details on the individual weightings.</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.4.1 Living wage</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.1.a Living wage (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.1.b Living wage (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.4.2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights</strong></p>\r\n<p><strong>D.4.3 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain</strong></p>\r\n<p><strong>D.4.4 Prohibition of child labour</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.4.a Age verification and corrective actions (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.4.b Age verification and corrective actions (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.4.5 Prohibition of forced labour</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.5.a Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.5.b Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.5.c Wage practices (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.5.d Wage practices (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.5.e Restrictions on workers (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.5.f Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.4.6 Freedom of association and collective bargaining</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.6.a Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.6.b Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.4.7 Health and safety</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.7.a Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.7.b Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.4.8 Women's rights</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.8.a Women’s rights (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.8.b Women’s rights (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.4.9 Working hours</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.9.a. Working hours (own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.9.b. Working hours (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.4.10 Responsible sourcing of minerals</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.10.a. Arrangements with suppliers and smelters/refiners in the mineral resource supply chains</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.10.b. Risk identification and responses in mineral supply chains</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.4.10.c. Reporting on responsible sourcing of minerals</p>",
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19244488",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244514",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244529",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244544",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246428",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244604",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244655",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244670",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19244783",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246469",
          "weight": 10
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_Company_human_rights_practices.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_ICT_D4_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_ICT_manufacturing_sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245033,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.1.a.S1 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_a_S1_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.1.a.S1 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Pays living wage or sets time-bound target\":\"5\",\"Describes how living wage determined\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_a_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_a_S1_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245037,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.1.a.S2 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_a_S2_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.1.a.S2 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Achieved paying a living wage\":\"5\",\"Reviews definition living wage with unions\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_a_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_a_S2_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245041,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.1.b.S2 Living wage (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_b_S2_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.1.b.S2 Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment of scope of payment below living wage in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_b_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_b_S2_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245045,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.1.b.S1 Living wage (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_b_S1_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.1.b.S1 Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on living wage in supplier codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on living wage\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_b_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_b_S1_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245050,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.1.a.S2 Living wage (in own production or manufacturingoperations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_a_S2_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturingoperations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.1.a.S2 Living wage (in own production or manufacturingoperations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_a_S2_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturingoperations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245052,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.1.a Living wage (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_a_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.1.a Living wage (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on living wage in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7; HRIB, 2.4.1, ETI, 5; SA8000; GLWC; SA8000, IV.8.1</p>\r\n<p>The company pays all its workers a living wage or discloses a time bound target to do so. The company regularly reviews its definition of the living wage and negotiates through collective bargaining with relevant trade unions (or equivalent worker bodies where the rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining are restricted under law). There are numerous definitions of living wage, but the core concept is to provide a decent living for a worker and his or her family (in line with Article 7 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights) based on a regular work week not including overtime hours. A living wage is sufficient to cover food, water, clothing, transport, education, health care and other essential needs for workers and their officially entitled dependents and provide some discretionary income. Workers also receive equal pay for equal work.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245033",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245037",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_Living_wage.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_a_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245059,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.1.b Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_b_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.1.b Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on living wage in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7, HRIB, 8.2.3, ETI, 5; FWF, 5; SA8000; GLWC; SA8000, IV.8.1</p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers pay their workers a living wage or discloses a time bound target for requiring suppliers to do so. The company assess the number of workers affected by any payment below living wages in the supply chain and demonstrates progress. There are numerous definitions of living wage, but the core concept is to provide a decent living for a worker and his or her family (in line with Article 7 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights) based on a regular work week not including overtime hours. A living wage is sufficient to cover food, water, clothing, transport, education, health care and other essential needs for workers and their officially entitled dependents and provide some discretionary income. Workers also receive equal pay for equal work.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245045",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245041",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_Living_wage.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_b_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245065,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.2.S1 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_2_S1_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.2.S1 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Describes practices to avoid price or short notice requirements that undermine HRs OR Describes practices to pay suppliers in line with agreed timeframes\":\"5\",\"Reviews own operations to mitigate negative impact of purchasing practices\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_2_S1_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245070,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on CHRB D.2.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var CHRB_d22s2,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  CHRB_d22s2 = CHRB_d22s2.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Meets all requirements under score 1\";\n  });\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d22s2, \"None of the above\") >= 0 || CHRB_d22s2.length === 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d22s2, \"Example of assessing and changing of purchasing practices\") >= 0 && CHRB_d22s1 === 10) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18023365",
          "name": "CHRB_d22s2"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245065",
          "name": "CHRB_d22s1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245080,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245085,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "question": "What does the company score on aligning purchasing decisions with human rights?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 16; UNGPRF C4.2: HRIB, 8.1.1; FLA, I.ER.24 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company ensures coherence between its purchasing policies and practices and its human rights commitment(s)and pays suppliers in line with agreed timeframes and for the amount agreed in the payment terms as well as communicate production needs to suppliers ahead of time. The company also mitigates negative human rights impacts of its purchasing practices in planning, merchandising and costing. </p>\r\n<p>Note: This indicator is related to indicator B.1.7 but focuses on different aspects of human rights impacts in supply chains. This indicator focuses on how the company’s actions can impact human rights in the supply chain while B.1.7 is about how the suppliers’ actions (should) influence the company’s actions.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245065",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245080",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AP_D2_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Apparel_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245091,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.3.S1 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_3_S1_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.3.S1 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_3_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_3_S1_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245095,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.3.S2 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_3_S2_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.3.S2 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Discloses names and locations of significant parts of supply chain and how significance was defined\":\"5\",\"Discloses direct or indirect suppliers involved in higher-risk activities\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_3_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_3_S2_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245100,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.3 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_3_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.3 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "question": "What does the company score on mapping and disclosing the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: GRI 102-9 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company maps its suppliers and discloses its mapping publicly. In order to gain greater visibility of the supply chain and reduce human rights risks, this process should include identifying higherrisk activities, geographies and products, and disclosing the names and specific locations of suppliers of the most significant parts of the company’s supply chain. This information should be provided for stakeholders in a useable format (e.g. downloadable, machinereadable).</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245091",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245095",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AP_D2_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Apparel_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_3_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245106,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4.a.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_a_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.4.a.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Indicates it does not use child labour\":\"5\",\"Age verification of recruited workers\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_a_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_a_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245110,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4.a.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_a_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.4.a.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_a_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_a_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245115,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4.a.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in ownproduction or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_a_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_ownproduction_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.4.a.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in ownproduction or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_a_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_ownproduction_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245117,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4.a.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in ownproduction or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_a_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_ownproduction_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.4.a.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in ownproduction or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_a_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_ownproduction_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245119,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4.a Prohibition of child labour: Age verification and corrective actions (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_a_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.4.a Prohibition of child labour: Age verification and corrective actions (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on age verification and corrective actions in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245106",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245110",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_Prohibition_of_child_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_a_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245124,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4.b.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_b_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.4.b.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment of scope of child labour in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_b_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_b_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245128,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4.b.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_b_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.4.b.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on child labour in supplier codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on eliminating child labour\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_b_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_b_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245133,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4.b.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in thesupply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_b_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_thesupply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.4.b.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in thesupply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_b_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_thesupply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245135,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4.b.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in thesupply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_b_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_thesupply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.4.b.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in thesupply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_b_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_thesupply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245137,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4.b Prohibition of child labour: Age verification and corrective actions (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_b_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.4.b Prohibition of child labour: Age verification and corrective actions (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on age verification and corrective actions in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Sources: ICRC, Art. 32; ILO, No. 138 &amp; No. 182; CRBP; HRIB 8.2.7; FLA V.CL.2, V.CL.4 and V.CL.8; ETI, 4.2 and 4.4; FWF, 3; SA8000; GRI 408-1; SA8000 IV.1.2 </p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers and third-party recruitment services verify the age of workers recruited to ensure that they comply with the ILO requirements for minimum age for admission to employment and are therefore entitled to work (see table below for relevant definitions). If the company learns that it has child labour in its supply chain it requires that its supplier(s) enrol the child/ children in a remediation/education programme, rather than just dismissing them from employment. The objective is to ensure that children are not pushed into more dangerous survival strategies. If young workers are found to be involved in hazardous work, the company requires that its supplier(s) remove the young workers immediately from the situation and provide alternative work that is not hazardous and is age- appropriate and therefore not child labour. The objective is to ensure that no workers under the age of 18 are required to perform hazardous work. </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245128",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245124",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_Prohibition_of_child_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_b_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245143,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.a.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_a_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.a.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Job seekers/workers do not pay recruitment fee\":\"5\",\"Commitment to fully reimburse recruitment fees paid\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_a_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_a_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245147,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.a.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_a_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.a.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_a_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_a_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245151,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.b.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_b_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.b.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on debt/fees in supplier codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on debt/fees for job seekers/workers\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_b_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_b_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245155,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.b.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_b_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.b.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment scope of payment of recruitment fees in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_b_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_b_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245159,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.c.S1 Wage practices (in own production or manufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_c_S1_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.c.S1 Wage practices (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Pays workers regularly in full and on time\":\"5\",\"Payslip workers shows wages and legitimate deductions\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_c_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_c_S1_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245163,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.c.S2 Wage practices (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_c_S2_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.c.S2 Wage practices (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_c_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_c_S2_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245167,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.d.S1 Wage practices (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_d_S1_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.d.S1 Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on paying in full and on time in supplier codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on paying workers regularly in full and on time\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_d_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_d_S1_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245171,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.d.S2 Wage practices (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_d_S2_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.d.S2 Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment scope of failure to pay workers in full and on time in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_d_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_d_S2_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245175,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.e.S2 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_e_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.e.S2 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_e_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_e_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245179,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.e.S1 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_e_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.e.S1 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_e_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_e_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245183,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.f.S1 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_f_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.f.S1 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on free movement in supplier codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes working with suppliers on free movement of workers\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_f_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_f_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245187,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.f.S2 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_f_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.f.S2 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment of scope of restriction of movement in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_f_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_f_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245192,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.a Prohibition of forced labour: Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_a_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.a Prohibition of forced labour: Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on recruitment fees and costs in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Sources: ICCPR, Art. 8; ILO, No. 29 &amp; No. 105; ILO 2019; HRIB 2.2.; ETI, 1.2; FLA IV.F.7.1 and IV.F.11; SA8000; GRI 409-1; SA8000 IV.2.1-3 and IV.8.2-3 </p>\r\n<p>The company refrains from or prohibits recruitment fees or related costs being charged to job seekers and workers, and ensures full reimbursement to job seekers and workers if they have been required to pay any fees and related costs during recruitment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245143",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245147",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_a_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245199,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.b Prohibition of forced labour: Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_b_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.b Prohibition of forced labour: Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on Recruitment fees and costs in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Sources: ICCPR, Art. 8; ILO, No. 29 &amp; No. 105; ILO 2019; HRIB, 8.2.6; ETI 1.2; FLA IV.F.7.1 and IV.F.11; SA8000; GRI 409-1; SA8000 IV.2.1-3 and IV.8.2-3 </p>\r\n<p>The company prohibits recruitment fees or costs being charged to workers by suppliers or any third-party recruitment intermediaries and works with suppliers to ensure full reimbursement to workers if they have been required to pay any fees and related costs during recruitment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245151",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245155",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_b_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245206,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.c Prohibition of forced labour: Wage practices (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_c_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.c Prohibition of forced labour: Wage practices (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on wage practices in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: FLA IV.F.2.3 and IV.F.12</em></p>\r\n<p>The company pays workers regularly, in full and on time in a recognised currency, and does not withhold wages or expenses that should be covered by the company.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245159",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245163",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_c_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245220,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.e Prohibition of forced labour: Restrictions on workers (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_e_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.e Prohibition of forced labour: Restrictions on workers (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on restrictions on workers in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICCPR, Art. 12; ILO, No. 29 &amp; No. 105; ILO 2019; HRIB 2.2; ETI 1.2; FLA IV.F.4, IV.F.5, IV.F.6, IV.F.9 and IV.F.10; SA8000; GRI 409-1; SA8000 IV.2.4</em></p>\r\n<p>The company does not restrict workers' mobility, including through the retention of passports, other personal identification or travel documents or bank payment cards or similar arrangements workers use for accessing wages. The company also refrains from requiring workers to use company provided accommodation.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245179",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245175",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_e_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245227,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.f Prohibition of forced labour: Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_f_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.f Prohibition of forced labour: Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on restrictions on workers in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICCPR, Art. 12; ILO, No. 29 &amp; No. 105; ILO 2019; HRIB 8.2.6; ETI 1.2; FLA IV.F.4, IV.F.5, IV.F.6, IV.F.9 and IV.F.10; SA8000; GRI 409-1; SA8000 IV.2.4 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers do not restrict workers' mobility, including through the retention of passports, other personal identification or travel documents or bank payment cards or similar arrangements workers use for accessing wages. The supplier also refrains from requiring workers to use company provided accommodation.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245183",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245187",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_f_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245233,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.6.a.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_a_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.6.a.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_a_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_a_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245237,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.6.a.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_a_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.6.a.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_a_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_a_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245241,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.6.b.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_b_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.6.b.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on FoA/CB in suppliers codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on FoA/CB\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_b_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_b_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245245,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.6.b.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_b_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.6.b.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment of scope of restriction of FoA/CB in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_b_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_b_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245249,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7.a.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.7.a.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Sets targets for H&S performance\":\"5\",\"Met targets or explains why not or how improve H&S management systems\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245253,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8.a.S1 Women’s rights (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_S1_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.8.a.S1 Women’s rights (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Describes processes to stop harassment and violence against women OR Working conditions take into account gender issues\":\"5\",\"Measures and steps to address gender pay gap at all levels of employment\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_S1_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245257,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8.b.S1 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_b_S1_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.8.b.S1 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on women's rights in contracts/codes with suppliers\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on women's rights\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_b_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_b_S1_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245261,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8.b.S2 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_b_S2_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.8.b.S2 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment of scope of unsafe working conditions/discrimination against women in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_b_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_b_S2_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245265,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9.a.S1 Working hours (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_a_S1_Working_hours_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.9.a.S1 Working hours (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Respects HRs regarding working hours/breaks/rest\":\"5\",\"Assesses ability of workers to comply with working hours commitments when allocating work\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_a_Working_hours_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_a_S1_Working_hours_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245269,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9.b.S1 Working hours (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_b_S1_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.9.b.S1 Working hours (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on working hours in codes/contracts with suppliers\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on working hours\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_b_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_b_S1_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245273,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9.b.S2 Working hours (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_b_S2_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.9.b.S2 Working hours (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assesment of scope of excessive working hours in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_b_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_b_S2_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245277,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9.a.S2 Working hours (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_a_S2_Working_hours_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.9.a.S2 Working hours (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_a_Working_hours_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_a_S2_Working_hours_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245282,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9.a.S2 Working hours (in own production ormanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_a_S2_Working_hours_in_own_production_ormanufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.9.a.S2 Working hours (in own production ormanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_a_S2_Working_hours_in_own_production_ormanufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245284,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9.a.S1 Working hours (in own production ormanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_a_S1_Working_hours_in_own_production_ormanufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.9.a.S1 Working hours (in own production ormanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_a_S1_Working_hours_in_own_production_ormanufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245286,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8.a.S1 Women’s rights (in own production ormanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_S1_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_ormanufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.8.a.S1 Women’s rights (in own production ormanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_S1_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_ormanufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245288,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7.a.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational diseaserates (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_diseaserates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.7.a.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational diseaserates (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_diseaserates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245290,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7.a.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own production or manufacturing operations) (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.7.a.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own production or manufacturing operations) (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil the requirements on CHRB D.2.7.a.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7.a.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own production or manufacturing operations) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var all, requirements,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  requirements = [\"Describes process to identify H&S risks and impacts\", \"Discloses injury rate or lost days for own workers in last reporting period\", \"Discloses fatalities for own workers in last reporting period\", \"Discloses occupational disease rate for own workers in last reporting period\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (all(requirements, CHRB_d27as1)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d27as1, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18023641",
          "name": "CHRB_d27as1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245300,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7.a.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own production or manufacturing operations) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.7.a.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own production or manufacturing operations) (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245305,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil the requirements on CHRB D.2.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var all, requirements,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  requirements = [\"Requirements on H&S in supplier codes and contracts\", \"Discloses injury rate or lost days in supply chain in last reporting period\", \"Discloses fatalities for workers in supply chain in last reporting period\", \"Discloses occupational disease rate in supply chain in last reporting period\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (all(requirements, CHRB_d27bs1)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d27bs1, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18023668",
          "name": "CHRB_d27bs1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245315,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245320,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil the requirements on CHRB D.2.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var all, requirements,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  requirements = [\"Describes work with suppliers of H&S\", \"Assessment of scope of H&S issues in supply chain\", \"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (all(requirements, CHRB_d27bs2)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d27bs2, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18023683",
          "name": "CHRB_d27bs2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245330,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245335,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8.a.S2 Women’s rights (in own production or manufacturing operations) (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.8.a.S2 Women’s rights (in own production or manufacturing operations) (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil the requirements on CHRB D.2.8.a.S2 Women’s rights (in own production or manufacturing operations)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8.a.S2 Women’s rights (in own production or manufacturing operations) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var CHRB_d28as2,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  CHRB_d28as2 = CHRB_d28as2.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Meets all requirements under score 1\";\n  });\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d28as2, \"None of the above\") >= 0 || CHRB_d28as2.length === 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (CHRB_d28as2 === 10) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18023707",
          "name": "CHRB_d28as2"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245253",
          "name": "CHRB_d28as1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245345,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8.a.S2 Women’s rights (in own production or manufacturing operations) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.8.a.S2 Women’s rights (in own production or manufacturing operations) (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245350,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5.d Prohibition of forced labour: Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_d_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5.d Prohibition of forced labour: Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on wage practices in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: IFLA IV.F.2.3 and IV.F.1</em></p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers pay workers regularly, in full, and on time in a recognised currency, and do not withhold wages or expenses that should be covered by the suppliers.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245167",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245171",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_d_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245357,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.6.a Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_a_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.6.a Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on D.2.6.a Freedom of association and collective bargaining in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7; ICCPR, Art. 22; ILO, No. 87 and No. 98; HRIB 2.6; FLA VI.FOA.1, VI.FOA.3 and VI.FOA.4; SA8000; GRI 407-1; SA8000 IV.4 </p>\r\n<p>The company respects the right of all workers to form and join a trade union of their choice (or equivalent worker bodies where the rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining are restricted under law) and to bargain collectively. In addition, it provides workers’ representatives with appropriate facilities to assist in the development of effective collective bargaining agreement(s). The company also prohibits intimidation, harassment, retaliation and violence against trade union members and trade union representatives.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245233",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245237",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_a_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245364,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.6.b Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_b_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.6.b Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on freedom of association and collective bargaining in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7, ICCPR, Art. 22; ILO, No. 87 &amp; No. 98; HRIB 2.6; ETI, 2; FLA VI.FOA.1, VI.FOA.3 and VI.FOA.4; FWF, 4; SA8000; GRI 407- 1; SA8000 IV.4 </p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers respect the right of all workers to form and join a trade union of their choice (or equivalent worker bodies where the rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining are restricted under law) and to bargain collectively. In addition, the company requires that its suppliers provide workers’ representatives with appropriate facilities to assist in the development of effective collective bargaining agreement(s). The company also requires that its suppliers prohibit intimidation, harassment, retaliation and violence against trade union members and trade union representatives.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245241",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245245",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_b_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245371,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7.a Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.7.a Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7; HRIB 3.3; FLA VII.HSE.30; SA8000; GRI 403-9; SA8000 IV.3.5 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company describes the process(es) it has in place to identify its health and safety risks and impacts and it discloses quantitative information on health and safety related to its total workforce, namely: injury rate, fatality rate, lost days (or near- miss frequency rate), and occupational disease rates.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245300",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245249",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_Health_and_safety.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_a_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245378,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7.b Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.7.b Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7; HRIB 8.2.1; FLA VII.HSE.30; SA8000; GRI 403- 9; SA8000 IV.3.5 </p>\r\n<p>The company discloses quantitative information on health and safety related to suppliers' workers, namely: injury rate, fatality rate, lost days (or near miss frequency rate), and occupational disease rate.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245315",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245330",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_Health_and_safety.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_b_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245385,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8.a Women's rights (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.8.a Women's rights (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on women's rights in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICEDAW; ILO, No. 100 &amp; No. 111; WEP; HRIB, 2.7; ETI, 7 and 9; FLA II.ND.8 FLA VII.HSE.11 FLA VII.HSE.12 FLA VIII.HOW.4; FWF, 2; SA8000; GRI 405-2; SA8000 IV.5 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company recognises the relevance of women’s rights for the sector, given the prevalence of women workers and the different dimensions of inequality they often face. The company has measures in place to implement its policy commitment to eliminate discrimination against women through providing equal pay for equal work and measures to ensure equal opportunities throughout all levels of employment. These may include setting up women’s committees that report to management to address and resolve issues, gender-equality training, and eliminating working or employment conditions linked to marital status or family responsibilities or the absence of pregnancy. In addition, the company has in place measures to eliminate health and safety concerns that are particularly prevalent among women workers (e.g., sexual harassment, physical security, and protection and accommodation of pregnant and nursing workers).</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245253",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245345",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_Women_s_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_a_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245392,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8.b Women's rights (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_b_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.8.b Women's rights (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on women's rights in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Sources: ICEDAW; ILO, No. 100 &amp; No. 111; WEP; HRIB, 8.2.5; ETI, 7 and 9; FLA II.ND.8, VII.HSE.11, VII.HSE.12 and VIII.HOW.4; FWF, 2; SA8000; GRI 405-2; SA8000 IV.5 </p>\r\n<p>The company recognises the relevance of women’s rights for the sector, given the prevalence of women workers and the different dimensions of inequality they often face. The company requires that its suppliers have measures in place to implement its policy commitment to eliminate discrimination against women through providing equal pay for equal work and measures to ensure equal opportunities throughout all levels of employment. These may include setting up women’s committees that report to management to address and resolve issues, gender-equality training, and eliminating working or employment conditions linked to marital status or family responsibilities or the absence of pregnancy. In addition, the company requires that its suppliers have measures in place to eliminate health and safety concerns that are particularly prevalent among women workers (e.g., sexual harassment, physical security and protection and accommodation of pregnant and nursing workers).</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245257",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245261",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_Women_s_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_b_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245399,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9.a Working hours (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_a_Working_hours_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.9.a Working hours (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on working hours in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7; ILO, No. 1, 14 &amp; 106; HRIB, 8.2.2; FLA VIII.HOW Workplace Code Provisions FLA VIII.HOW.3 FLA VIII.HOW.8; FWF, 6; SA8000 IV.7 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company respects applicable international standards concerning maximum working hours and minimum breaks and rest periods. The company also assesses the ability of workers within its factories to comply with its commitments to respect working hours and minimum breaks and rest period when allocating work or setting targets.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245265",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245277",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_Working_hours.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_a_Working_hours_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245406,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9.b Working hours (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_b_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.9.b Working hours (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on working hours in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7; ILO, No. 1, 14 &amp; 106; HRIB, 8.2.2; FLA VIII.HOW Workplace Code Provisions FLA VIII.HOW.3 FLA VIII.HOW.8; ETI, 6; FWF, 6; SA8000 IV.7</em> </p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers respect applicable international standards concerning maximum working hours and minimum breaks and rest periods. The company also assesses the ability of suppliers to comply with its commitments to respect working hours and minimum breaks and rest periods when allocating work or setting targets in its purchasing orders.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245269",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245273",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_Working_hours.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_b_Working_hours_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245413,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB Theme D (AP-D2)  - Performance: Company Human Rights Practices (Apparel sector)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AP_D2_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Apparel_sector.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB Theme D (AP-D2)  - Performance: Company Human Rights Practices (Apparel sector)",
      "question": "What does the company score on human rights practices?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This measurement theme focuses on selected human rights related practices specific to each sector. The indicators seek to assess the actual practices occurring within companies in order to implement key enablers and business processes and to prevent specific impacts on human rights particularly at risk of occurring given the sector in question. </p>\r\n<p>Many of these interconnect with the other CHRB measurement themes and company approaches to policy commitments and governance, embedding respect for human rights in culture and management systems, undertaking human rights due diligence or implementing remediation processes. </p>\r\n<p>However, these indicators aid the inter- and intra-comparative benefits of the benchmark. Complemented by the CHRB performance indicators on responses to serious allegations (measurement theme E), these indicators seek to achieve a more comprehensive overall proxy measure for the human rights performance of a company being benchmarked.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>There are 20 indicators for the Apparel companies in Theme D, with a variety of single, half and sixth weightings. See Annex 1 for details on the individual weightings.</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.2.1 Living wage</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.2.1.a Living wage (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.2.1.b Living wage (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.2.2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights</strong></p>\r\n<p><strong>D.2.3 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain</strong></p>\r\n<p><strong>D.2.4 Prohibition of child labour</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.2.4.a Age verification and corrective actions (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.2.4.b Age verification and corrective actions (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.2.5 Prohibition of forced labour</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.2.5.a Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.2.5.b Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.2.5.c Wage practices (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.2.5.d Wage practices (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.2.5.e Restrictions on workers (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.2.5.f Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.2.6 Freedom of association and collective bargaining</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.2.6.a Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.2.6.b Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in the supply chain)</p>",
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19246283",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245085",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245100",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246297",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246312",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246331",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246359",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246388",
          "weight": 11.11
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246403",
          "weight": 11.11
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_Company_human_rights_practices.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AP_D2_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Apparel_sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245422,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB A.1.2 Commitment to respect the human rights of workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB A.1.2 Commitment to respect the human rights of workers",
      "question": "What does the company score on commitments to respect the human rights of workers?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18831998",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18832079",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_A_1_Policy_commitments.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_A_1_2_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245467,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1.a.S1 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_a_S1_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.1.a.S1 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Pays living wage or sets time-bound target\":\"5\",\"Describes how living wage determined\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_a_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_a_S1_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245471,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1.a.S2 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_a_S2_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.1.a.S2 Living wage (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Achieved paying a living wage\":\"5\",\"Reviews definition living wage with unions\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_a_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_a_S2_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245475,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1.b.S2 Living wage (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_b_S2_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.1.b.S2 Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment of scope of payment below living wage in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_b_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_b_S2_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245480,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1.a.S1 Living wage (in own production or manufacturingoperations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_a_S1_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturingoperations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.1.a.S1 Living wage (in own production or manufacturingoperations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_a_S1_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturingoperations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245482,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1.a.S2 Living wage (in own production or manufacturingoperations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_a_S2_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturingoperations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.1.a.S2 Living wage (in own production or manufacturingoperations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_a_S2_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturingoperations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245483,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1.b.S1 Living wage (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_b_S1_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.1.b.S1 Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on living wage in supplier codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on living wage\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_b_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_b_S1_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245487,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.2.S1 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_2_S1_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.2.S1 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Describes practices to avoid price or short notice requirements that undermine HRs OR Describes practices to pay suppliers in line with agreed timeframes\":\"5\",\"Reviews own operations to mitigate negative impact of purchasing practices\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_2_S1_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245492,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil the requirements on CHRB D.1.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var CHRB_d12s2,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  CHRB_d12s2 = CHRB_d12s2.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Meets all requirements under score 1\";\n  });\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d12s2, \"None of the above\") >= 0 || CHRB_d12s2.length === 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (CHRB_d12s1 === 10) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18022839",
          "name": "CHRB_d12s2"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245487",
          "name": "CHRB_d12s1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245502,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.2.S2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_2_S2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245506,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.3.S1 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_3_S1_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.3.S1 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_3_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_3_S1_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245510,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.3.S2 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_3_S2_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.3.S2 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Discloses names and locations of significant parts of the supply chain and how significance was defined\":\"5\",\"Discloses direct or indirect suppliers involved in higher-risk activities\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_3_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_3_S2_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245514,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.4.a.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_a_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.4.a.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_a_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_a_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245518,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.4.a.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_a_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.4.a.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in own\nproduction or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Indicates it does not use child labour\":\"5\",\"Age verification of recruited workers\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_a_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_a_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245523,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.4.a.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in ownproduction or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_a_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_ownproduction_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.4.a.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in ownproduction or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_a_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_ownproduction_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245524,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.4.b.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_b_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.4.b.S1 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on child labour in supplier codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on eliminating child labour\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_b_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_b_S1_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245528,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.4.b.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_b_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.4.b.S2 Age verification and corrective actions (in the\nsupply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment of scope of child labour in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_b_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_b_S2_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245532,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.b.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_b_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.b.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on debt/fees in supplier codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on debt/fees for job seekers/workers\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_b_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_b_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245536,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.b.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_b_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.b.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment scope of payment of recruitment fees in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_b_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_b_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245540,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.c.S1 Wage practices (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_c_S1_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.c.S1 Wage practices (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Pays workers regularly in full and on time\":\"5\",\"Worker payslips shows wages and legitimate deductions\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_c_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_c_S1_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245545,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.c.S1 Wage practices (in own production ormanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_c_S1_Wage_practices_in_own_production_ormanufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.c.S1 Wage practices (in own production ormanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_c_S1_Wage_practices_in_own_production_ormanufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245546,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.c.S2 Wage practices (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_c_S2_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.c.S2 Wage practices (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_c_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_c_S2_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245550,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.d.S2 Wage practices (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_d_S2_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.d.S2 Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment scope of failure to pay workers in full and on time in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_d_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_d_S2_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245554,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.d.S1 Wage practices (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_d_S1_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.d.S1 Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on paying in full and on time in supplier codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on paying workers regularly in full and on time\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_d_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_d_S1_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245558,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.e.S1 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+Vasiliki Gkatziaki",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_e_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.e.S1 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_e_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_e_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245562,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.e.S2 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_e_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.e.S2 Restrictions on workers (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_e_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_e_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245566,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.f.S1 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_f_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.f.S1 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on free movement in supplier codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes working with suppliers on free movement of workers\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_f_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_f_S1_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245570,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.f.S2 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_f_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.f.S2 Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment of scope of restriction of movement in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_f_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_f_S2_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245574,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.6.a.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_a_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.6.a.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_a_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_a_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245578,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.6.a.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_a_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.6.a.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_a_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_a_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245582,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.6.b.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_b_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.6.b.S2 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment of scope of restriction of FoA/CB in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_b_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_b_S2_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245586,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.6.b.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_b_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.6.b.S1 Freedom of association and collective bargaining\n(in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on FoA/CB in suppliers codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on FoA/CB\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_b_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_b_S1_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245591,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7.a.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own production or manufacturing operations) (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_a_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.7.a.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own production or manufacturing operations) (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil the requirements on CHRB D.1.7.a.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own production or manufacturing operations)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7.a.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own production or manufacturing operations) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var all, requirements,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  requirements = [\"Describes process to identify H&S risks and impacts\", \"Discloses injury rate or lost days for own workers in last reporting period\", \"Discloses fatalities for own workers in last reporting period\", \"Discloses occupational disease rate for own workers in last reporting period\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (all(requirements, CHRB_d17s1)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d17s1, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18023116",
          "name": "CHRB_d17s1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_a_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_a_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245601,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7.a.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own production or manufacturing operations) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_a_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.7.a.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own production or manufacturing operations) (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_a_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_a_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245606,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7.a.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_a_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.7.a.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease\nrates (in own production or manufacturing\noperations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Sets targets for H&S performance\":\"5\",\"Met targets or explains why not or how improve H&S management systems\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_a_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_a_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245645,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil the requirements on CHRB D.1.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var all, requirements,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  requirements = [\"Requirements on H&S in supplier codes and contracts\", \"Discloses injury rate or lost days in supply chain in last reporting period\", \"Discloses fatalities for workers in supply chain in last reporting period\", \"Discloses occupational disease rate in supply chain in last reporting period\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (all(requirements, CHRB_d17bs1)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d17bs1, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18023140",
          "name": "CHRB_d17bs1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245655,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.7.b.S1 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_S1_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245660,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil the requirement on CHRB D.1.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain)",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var all, requirements,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  requirements = [\"Describes work with suppliers of H&S\", \"Assessment of scope of H&S issues in supply chain\", \"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (all(requirements, CHRB_d17bs2)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d17bs2, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18023152",
          "name": "CHRB_d17bs2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245670,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.7.b.S2 Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_S2_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245686,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.8.b.S1 Land acquisition (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_b_S1_Land_acquisition_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.8.b.S1 Land acquisition (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on land and tenure rights in supplier codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on land issues\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_b_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_b_S1_Land_acquisition_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245691,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.8.b.S2 Land acquisition (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_b_S2_Land_acquisition_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.8.b.S2 Land acquisition (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil the requirements on CHRB D.1.8.b.S2 Land acquisition (in the supply chain)?",
      "metric_type": "formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.8.b.S2 Land acquisition (in the supply chain) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var all, requirements,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  requirements = [\"Requirement for suppliers to provide compensation in resettlement\", \"Assessment of scope of land rights issues in supply chain\", \"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\"];\n\n  all = function(source, target) {\n    var element, i, len;\n    for (i = 0, len = source.length; i < len; i++) {\n      element = source[i];\n      if (indexOf.call(target, element) < 0) {\n        return false;\n      }\n    }\n    return true;\n  };\n\n  if (all(requirements, CHRB_d18bs2)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d18bs2, \"None of the above\") >= 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18023200",
          "name": "CHRB_d18bs2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_b_S2_Land_acquisition_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_b_S2_Land_acquisition_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245701,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.8.b.S2 Land acquisition (in the supply chain) (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_b_S2_Land_acquisition_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.8.b.S2 Land acquisition (in the supply chain) (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_b_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_b_S2_Land_acquisition_in_the_supply_chain_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245705,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.9.a.S1 Water and sanitation (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_a_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.9.a.S1 Water and sanitation (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_a_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_a_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245709,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.9.a.S2 Water and sanitation (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_a_S2_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.9.a.S2 Water and sanitation (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Sets targets on water stewardship that consider water use by local communities\":\"5\",\"Reports progress in meeting targets and trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_a_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_a_S2_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245714,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.9.a.S1 Water and sanitation (in own production ormanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_a_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_production_ormanufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.9.a.S1 Water and sanitation (in own production ormanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_a_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_production_ormanufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245715,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.9.b.S1 Water and sanitation (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_b_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.9.b.S1 Water and sanitation (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on access to water and sanitation in supplier codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on access to water\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_b_Water_and_sanitation_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_b_S1_Water_and_sanitation_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245719,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.9.b.S2 Water and sanitation (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_b_S2_Water_and_sanitation_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.9.b.S2 Water and sanitation (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment of scope of water and sanitation issues in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_b_Water_and_sanitation_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_b_S2_Water_and_sanitation_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245723,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.10.a.S1 Women’s rights (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_a_S1_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.10.a.S1 Women’s rights (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Describes processes to stop harassment and violence against women OR Working conditions take into account gender issues\":\"5\",\"Measures and steps to address gender pay gap at all levels of employment\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_a_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_a_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_a_S1_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245728,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.10.a.S2 Women's rights (in own production or manufacturing operations (Categorical)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_a_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.10.a.S2 Women's rights (in own production or manufacturing operations (Categorical)",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on CHRB D.1.10.a.S2 Women’s rights (in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.10.a.S2 Women's rights (in own production or manufacturing operations (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var CHRB_d110as2,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; };\n\n  CHRB_d110as2 = CHRB_d110as2.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Meets all requirements under score 1\";\n  });\n\n  if (indexOf.call(CHRB_d110as2, \"None of the above\") >= 0 || CHRB_d110as1.length === 0) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (CHRB_d110as1 === 10) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18023270",
          "name": "CHRB_d110as2"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245723",
          "name": "CHRB_d110as1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_a_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_a_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245738,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.10.a.S2 Women's rights (in own production or manufacturing operations (Categorical)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_a_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.10.a.S2 Women's rights (in own production or manufacturing operations (Categorical)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_a_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_a_S2_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations_Categorical+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245742,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.10.b.S1 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_b_S1_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.10.b.S1 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Requirements on women's rights in supplier codes and contracts\":\"5\",\"Describes work with suppliers on women's rights\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_b_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_b_S1_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245746,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.10.b.S2 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_b_S2_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.10.b.S2 Women’s rights (in the supply chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Assessment of scope of women's rights issues in supply chain\":\"5\",\"Analysis of trends demonstrating progress\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_b_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_b_S2_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245756,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1.a Living wage (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_a_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.1.a Living wage (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on living wages in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7; HRIB, 2.4.1, ETI, 5; SA8000; GLWC; SA8000, IV.8.1 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company pays all its workers a living wage or discloses a time bound target to do so. The company regularly reviews its definition of the living wage and negotiates through collective bargaining with relevant trade unions (or equivalent worker bodies where the rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining are restricted under law). There are numerous definitions of living wage, but the core concept is to provide a decent living for a worker and his or her family (in line with Article 7 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights) based on a regular work week not including overtime hours. A living wage is sufficient to cover food, water, clothing, transport, education, health care and other essential needs for workers and their officially entitled dependents and provide some discretionary income. Workers also receive equal pay for equal work.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245467",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245471",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_Living_wage.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_a_Living_wage_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245763,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1.b Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_b_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.1.b Living wage (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on living wages in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7, HRIB, 8.2.3, ETI, 5; FWF, 5; SA8000; GLWC; SA8000, IV.8.1 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers pay their workers a living wage or discloses a time bound target for requiring suppliers to do so. The company assess the number of workers affected by any payment below living wages in the supply chain and demonstrates progress. There are numerous definitions of living wage, but the core concept is to provide a decent living for a worker and his or her family (in line with Article 7 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights) based on a regular work week not including overtime hours. A living wage is sufficient to cover food, water, clothing, transport, education, health care and other essential needs for workers and their officially entitled dependents and provide some discretionary income. Workers also receive equal pay for equal work.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245483",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245475",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_Living_wage.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_b_Living_wage_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245770,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1 Living wage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_Living_wage.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.1 Living wage",
      "question": "What does the company score on living wages?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1 Living wage+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scores, sum;\n\n  scores = [CHRB_d11a, CHRB_d11b].filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Unknown\";\n  });\n\n  sum = scores.reduce((function(sum, item) {\n    return sum + item;\n  }), 0);\n\n  sum / scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245756",
          "name": "CHRB_d11a"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245763",
          "name": "CHRB_d11b"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_Living_wage+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_Living_wage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245776,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights",
      "question": "What does the company score on aligning purchasing decisions with human rights?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UNGP 16; UNGPRF C4.2: HRIB, 8.1.1; FLA, I.ER.24 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company ensures coherence between its purchasing policies and practices and its human rights commitment(s)and pays suppliers in line with agreed timeframes and for the amount agreed in the payment terms as well as communicate production needs to suppliers ahead of time. The company also mitigates negative human rights impacts of its purchasing practices in planning, merchandising and costing. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> This indicator is related to indicator B.1.7 but focuses on different aspects of human rights impacts in supply chains. This indicator focuses on how the company’s actions can impact human rights in the supply chain while B.1.7 is about how the suppliers’ actions (should) influence the company’s actions.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245487",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245502",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AG_D1_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_2_Aligning_purchasing_decisions_with_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245783,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.3 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_3_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.3 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain",
      "question": "What does the company score on mapping and disclosing the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: GRI 102-9 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company maps its suppliers and discloses its mapping publicly. In order to gain greater visibility of the supply chain and reduce human rights risks, this process should include identifying higher-risk activities, geographies and products, and disclosing the names and specific locations of suppliers of the most significant parts of the company’s supply chain. This information should be provided for stakeholders in a useable format (e.g. downloadable, machine-readable.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245506",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245510",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AG_D1_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_3_Mapping_and_disclosing_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245790,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.4.a Prohibition of child labour: Age verification and corrective actions (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_a_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.4.a Prohibition of child labour: Age verification and corrective actions (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on age verification and corrective actions in regards to prohibition of child labour in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: CRC, Art. 32; ILO, No. 138 &amp; No. 182; CRBP; HRIB, 2.3; FLA V.CL.2, V.CL.4 and V.CL.8; ETI, 4.2 and 4.4; FWF, 3; SA8000; GRI 408-1; SA8000 IV.1.2</em> </p>\r\n<p>The company does not use child labour. It verifies the age of workers recruited in its own operations to ensure they comply with the ILO requirements for minimum age for admission to employment and are therefore entitled to work. If the company learns that it has child labour in its operations, it ensures that the child/children is/are enrolled in a remediation/education programme, rather than just dismissing them from employment. The objective is to ensure that children are not pushed into more dangerous survival strategies. If young workers are found to be involved in hazardous work, they are removed immediately from the situation and provided alternative work that is not hazardous and is age- appropriate and therefore not child labour. The objective is to ensure that no workers under the age of 18 are required to perform hazardous work.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245518",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245514",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_Prohibition_of_child_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_a_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245797,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.4.b Prohibition of child labour: Age verification and corrective actions (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_b_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.4.b Prohibition of child labour: Age verification and corrective actions (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on age verification and corrective actions in regards to prohibition of child labour in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: CRC, Art. 32; ILO, No. 138 &amp; No. 182; CRBP; HRIB 8.2.7; FLA V.CL.2, V.CL.4 and V.CL.8; ETI, 4.2 and 4.4; FWF, 3; SA8000; GRI 408-1; SA8000 IV.1.2 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers and third-party recruitment services verify the age of workers recruited to ensure that they comply with the ILO requirements for minimum age for admission to employment and are therefore entitled to work (see table below for relevant definitions). If the company learns that it has child labour in its supply chain it requires that its supplier(s) enrol the child/ children in a remediation/education programme, rather than just dismissing them from employment. The objective is to ensure that children are not pushed into more dangerous survival strategies. If young workers are found to be involved in hazardous work, the company requires that its supplier(s) remove the young workers immediately from the situation and provide alternative work that is not hazardous and is age- appropriate and therefore not child labour. The objective is to ensure that no workers under the age of 18 are required to perform hazardous work.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245524",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245528",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_Prohibition_of_child_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_b_Prohibition_of_child_labour_Age_verification_and_corrective_actions_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245803,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.a.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_a_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.a.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_a_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_a_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245808,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.a.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production ormanufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_a_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_ormanufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.a.S2 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production ormanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_a_S2_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_ormanufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245809,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.a.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_a_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.a.S1 Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Job seekers/workers do not pay recruitment fee\":\"5\",\"Commitment to fully reimburse recruitment fees paid\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_a_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_a_S1_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245814,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.a Prohibition of forced labour: Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_a_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.a Prohibition of forced labour: Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on recruitment fees and costs in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245809",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245803",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_a_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245876,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.b Prohibition of forced labour: Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_b_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.b Prohibition of forced labour: Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on recruitment fees and costs in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICCPR, Art. 8; ILO, No. 29 &amp; No. 105; ILO 2019; HRIB, 8.2.6; ETI 1.2; FLA IV.F.7.1 and IV.F.11; SA8000; GRI 409-1; SA8000 IV.2.1-3 and IV.8.2-3 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company prohibits recruitment fees or costs being charged to workers by suppliers or any third-party recruitment intermediaries and works with suppliers to ensure full reimbursement to workers if they have been required to pay any fees and related costs during recruitment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245532",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245536",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_b_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Recruitment_fees_and_costs_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245883,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.c Prohibition of forced labour: Wage practices (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_c_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.c Prohibition of forced labour: Wage practices (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on wage practices in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245540",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245546",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_c_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245889,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.d Prohibition of forced labour: Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_d_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.d Prohibition of forced labour: Wage practices (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on wage practices in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: IFLA IV.F.2.3 and IV.F.12</em></p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers pay workers regularly, in full, and on time in a recognised currency, and do not withhold wages or expenses that should be covered by the suppliers.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245554",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245550",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_d_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Wage_practices_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245900,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.e Prohibition of forced labour: Restrictions on workers (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_e_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.e Prohibition of forced labour: Restrictions on workers (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on restriction on workers in regards to prohibition of forced labour in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICCPR, Art. 12; ILO, No. 29 &amp; No. 105; ILO 2019; HRIB 2.2; ETI 1.2; FLA IV.F.4, IV.F.5, IV.F.6, IV.F.9 and IV.F.10; SA8000; GRI 409-1; SA8000 IV.2.4 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company does not restrict workers’ mobility, including through the retention of passports, other personal identification or travel documents or bank payment cards or similar arrangements workers use for accessing wages. The company also refrains from requiring workers to use company provided accommodation.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245558",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245562",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_e_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245907,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5.f Prohibition of forced labour: Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_f_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5.f Prohibition of forced labour: Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on restrictions on workers in regards to prohibition of forced labour in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICCPR, Art. 12; ILO, No. 29 &amp; No. 105; ILO 2019; HRIB 8.2.6; ETI 1.2; FLA IV.F.4, IV.F.5, IV.F.6, IV.F.9 and IV.F.10; SA8000; GRI 409-1; SA8000 IV.2.4 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers do not restrict workers’ mobility, including through the retention of passports, other personal identification or travel documents or bank payment cards or similar arrangements workers use for accessing wages. The supplier also refrains from requiring workers to use company provided accommodation.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245566",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245570",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_f_Prohibition_of_forced_labour_Restrictions_on_workers_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245914,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5 Prohibition of forced labour",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5 Prohibition of forced labour",
      "question": "What does the company score on the prohibition of forced labour?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5 Prohibition of forced labour+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scores, sum;\n\n  scores = [CHRB_d15a, CHRB_d15b, CHRB_d15c, CHRB_d15d, CHRB_d15e, CHRB_d15f];\n\n  scores = scores.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Unknown\";\n  });\n\n  sum = scores.reduce((function(sum, item) {\n    return sum + item;\n  }), 0);\n\n  sum / scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245814",
          "name": "CHRB_d15a"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245876",
          "name": "CHRB_d15b"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245883",
          "name": "CHRB_d15c"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245889",
          "name": "CHRB_d15d"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245900",
          "name": "CHRB_d15e"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245907",
          "name": "CHRB_d15f"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245924,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.6.a Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_a_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.6.a Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on freedom of association and collective bargaining in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7; ICCPR, Art. 22; ILO, No. 87 and No. 98; HRIB 2.6; FLA VI.FOA.1, VI.FOA.3 and VI.FOA.4; SA8000; GRI 407-1; SA8000 IV.4 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company respects the right of all workers to form and join a trade union of their choice (or equivalent worker bodies where the rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining are restricted under law) and to bargain collectively. In addition, it provides workers’ representatives with appropriate facilities to assist in the development of effective collective bargaining agreement(s). The company also prohibits intimidation, harassment, retaliation and violence against trade union members and trade union representatives.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245574",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245578",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_a_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245931,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.6.b Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_b_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.6.b Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on freedom of association and collective bargaining in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7, ICCPR, Art. 22; ILO, No. 87 &amp; No. 98; HRIB 2.6; ETI, 2; FLA VI.FOA.1, VI.FOA.3 and VI.FOA.4; FWF, 4; SA8000; GRI 407- 1; SA8000 IV.4 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers respect the right of all workers to form and join a trade union of their choice (or equivalent worker bodies where the rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining are restricted under law) and to bargain collectively. In addition, the company requires that its suppliers provide workers’ representatives with appropriate facilities to assist in the development of effective collective bargaining agreement(s). The company also requires that its suppliers prohibit intimidation, harassment, retaliation and violence against trade union members and trade union representatives.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245586",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245582",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_b_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245938,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7.a Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_a_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.7.a Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7; HRIB 3.3; FLA VII.HSE.30; SA8000; GRI 403-9; SA8000 IV.3.5</em></p>\r\n<p>The company describes the process(es) it has in place to identify its health and safety risks and impacts and it discloses quantitative information on health and safety related to its total workforce, namely: injury rate, fatality rate, lost days (or near- miss frequency rate), and occupational disease rates.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245601",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245606",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_Health_and_safety.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_a_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245945,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7.b Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.7.b Health and safety: Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 7; HRIB 8.2.1; FLA VII.HSE.30; SA8000; GRI 403- 9; SA8000 IV.3.5 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company discloses quantitative information on health and safety related to suppliers' workers, namely: injury rate, fatality rate, lost days (or near miss frequency rate), and occupational disease rate.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245655",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245670",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_Health_and_safety.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_b_Health_and_safety_Fatalities_lost_days_injury_occupational_disease_rates_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245952,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7 Health and safety",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_Health_and_safety.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.7 Health and safety",
      "question": "What does the company score on health and safety?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7 Health and safety+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scores, sum;\n\n  scores = [CHRB_d17a, CHRB_d17b].filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Unknown\";\n  });\n\n  sum = scores.reduce((function(sum, item) {\n    return sum + item;\n  }), 0);\n\n  sum / scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245938",
          "name": "CHRB_d17a"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245945",
          "name": "CHRB_d17b"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_Health_and_safety+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_Health_and_safety+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245959,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.8.a Land rights: Land acquisition (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_a_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.8.a Land rights: Land acquisition (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on land acquisition in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: UN Voluntary Guidelines; HRIB 5.2; IFC PS 5; Interlaken Group 2015; USAID 2015; FDC 2014 </em></p>\r\n<p>When acquiring, leasing or making other arrangements to use, or restrict the use of, land, the company recognises legitimate tenure rights, (as set out in the relevant part(s) of the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (VGGT), with particular attention to vulnerable or marginalised tenure rights holders, recognising that claims to tenure rights may be legitimate under the VGGT even when they are not recognised or registered by the government.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Conversion for Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245965",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245969",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_Land_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_a_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245965,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.8.a.S1 Land acquisition (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_a_S1_Land_acquisition_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.8.a.S1 Land acquisition (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Conversion for Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_a_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_a_S1_Land_acquisition_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245969,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.8.a.S2 Land acquisition (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_a_S2_Land_acquisition_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.8.a.S2 Land acquisition (in own production or\nmanufacturing operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Describes approach to compensation including valuation\":\"5\",\"Describes steps to meet IFC PS 5 in state deals\":\"5\",\"None of the above\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_a_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_a_S2_Land_acquisition_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245974,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.8.b Land rights: Land acquisition (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_b_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.8.b Land rights: Land acquisition (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on land acquisition in regards to land rights in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICEDAW; ILO, No. 100 &amp; No. 111; WEP; HRIB, 8.2.5; ETI, 7 and 9; FLA II.ND.8, VII.HSE.11, VII.HSE.12 and VIII.HOW.4; FWF, 2; SA8000; GRI 405-2; SA8000 IV.5 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers have a process to identify legitimate tenure rights holders, as set out in the relevant part(s) of the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security when acquiring, leasing or making other arrangements to use or restrict the use of land, with particular attention to vulnerable and marginalised tenure rights holders. The company engages directly with suppliers on this issue.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245686",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245701",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_Land_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_b_Land_rights_Land_acquisition_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245981,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.8 Land rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_Land_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.8 Land rights",
      "question": "What does the company score on land rights?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Conversion for Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.8 Land rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scores, sum;\n\n  scores = [CHRB_d18a, CHRB_d18b].filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Unknown\";\n  });\n\n  sum = scores.reduce((function(sum, item) {\n    return sum + item;\n  }), 0);\n\n  sum / scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245959",
          "name": "CHRB_d18a"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245974",
          "name": "CHRB_d18b"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_Land_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_Land_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245987,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.9.a Water and sanitation (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_a_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.9.a Water and sanitation (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on water and sanitation in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 11 and 12; SDG, 6, HRIB 5.1, UNGC CEO Water Mandate, UN GA Res 64/292: IPIECA ENV-1.C4 IPIECA ENV-2.A2; RMF F.03.1 </em></p>\r\n<p>The company does not negatively affect access to safe water, in line with the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the UN Global Compact’s CEO Water Mandate.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245705",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245709",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_Water_and_sanitation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_a_Water_and_sanitation_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19245994,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.9.b Water and sanitation (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_b_Water_and_sanitation_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.9.b Water and sanitation (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on water and sanitation in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Sources: ICESCR, Art. 11 and 12; SDG, 6, HRIB 5.2, UNGC CEO Water Mandate, UN GA Res 64/292; SASB CN0101-23, CN0102-22, CN0201-13 and CN0103-19 </p>\r\n<p>The company requires that its suppliers do not negatively affect access to safe water, in line with the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the UN Global Compact's CEO Water Mandate.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245715",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245719",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_Water_and_sanitation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_b_Water_and_sanitation_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246001,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.9 Water and sanitation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_Water_and_sanitation.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.9 Water and sanitation",
      "question": "What does the company score on water and sanitation?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.9 Water and sanitation+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scores, sum;\n\n  scores = [CHRB_d19a, CHRB_d19b].filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Unknown\";\n  });\n\n  sum = scores.reduce((function(sum, item) {\n    return sum + item;\n  }), 0);\n\n  sum / scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245987",
          "name": "CHRB_d19a"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245994",
          "name": "CHRB_d19b"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_Water_and_sanitation+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_Water_and_sanitation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246060,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.10.a Women's rights (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_a_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.10.a Women's rights (in own production or manufacturing operations)",
      "question": "What does the company score on women's rights in own production or manufacturing operations?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: CEDAW; ILO, No. 100 &amp; No. 111; WEP; HRIB, 2.7; ETI, 7 and 9; FLA II.ND.8 FLA VII.HSE.11 FLA VII.HSE.12 FLA VIII.HOW.4; FWF, 2; SA8000; GRI 405-2; SA8000 IV.5 </em><br>The company recognises the relevance of women’s rights for the sector, given the prevalence of women workers and the different dimensions of inequality they often face. The company has measures in place to implement its policy commitment to eliminate discrimination against women through providing equal pay for equal work and measures to ensure equal opportunities throughout all levels of employment. These may include setting up women’s committees that report to management to address and resolve issues, gender-equality training, and eliminating working or employment conditions linked to marital status or family responsibilities or the absence of pregnancy. In addition, the company has in place measures to eliminate health and safety concerns that are particularly prevalent among women workers (e.g., sexual harassment, physical security, and protection and accommodation of pregnant and nursing workers).</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245723",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245738",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_Women_s_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_a_Women_s_rights_in_own_production_or_manufacturing_operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246067,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.10.b Women's rights (in the supply chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_b_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.10.b Women's rights (in the supply chain)",
      "question": "What does the company score on women's rights in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em>Sources: CEDAW; ILO, No. 100 &amp; No. 111; WEP; HRIB, 8.2.5; ETI, 7 and 9; FLA II.ND.8, VII.HSE.11, VII.HSE.12 and VIII.HOW.4; FWF, 2; SA8000; GRI 405-2; SA8000 IV.5 </em><br>The company recognises the relevance of women’s rights for the sector, given the prevalence of women workers and the different dimensions of inequality they often face. The company requires that its suppliers have measures in place to implement its policy commitment to eliminate discrimination against women through providing equal pay for equal work and measures to ensure equal opportunities throughout all levels of employment. These may include setting up women’s committees that report to management to address and resolve issues, gender-equality training, and eliminating working or employment conditions linked to marital status or family responsibilities or the absence of pregnancy. In addition, the company requires that its suppliers have measures in place to eliminate health and safety concerns that are particularly prevalent among women workers (e.g., sexual harassment, physical security and protection and accommodation of pregnant and nursing workers).</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19245742",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245746",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_Women_s_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_b_Women_s_rights_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246074,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.10 Women's rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_Women_s_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.10 Women's rights",
      "question": "What does the company score on women's rights?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.10 Women's rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scores, sum;\n\n  scores = [CHRB_d110a, CHRB_d110b].filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Unknown\";\n  });\n\n  sum = scores.reduce((function(sum, item) {\n    return sum + item;\n  }), 0);\n\n  sum / scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19246060",
          "name": "CHRB_d110a"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19246067",
          "name": "CHRB_d110b"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_Women_s_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_Women_s_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246080,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.4 Prohibition of child labour",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_Prohibition_of_child_labour.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.4 Prohibition of child labour",
      "question": "What does the company score on prohibition of child labour?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.4 Prohibition of child labour+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scores, sum;\n\n  scores = [CHRB_d14a, CHRB_d14b].filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Unknown\";\n  });\n\n  sum = scores.reduce((function(sum, item) {\n    return sum + item;\n  }), 0);\n\n  sum / scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245790",
          "name": "CHRB_d14a"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245797",
          "name": "CHRB_d14b"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_Prohibition_of_child_labour+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_Prohibition_of_child_labour+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246086,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.6 Freedom of association and collective bargaining",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.6 Freedom of association and collective bargaining",
      "question": "What does the company score on freedom of association and collective bargaining?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.6 Freedom of association and collective bargaining+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scores, sum;\n\n  scores = [CHRB_d16a, CHRB_d16b].filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Unknown\";\n  });\n\n  sum = scores.reduce((function(sum, item) {\n    return sum + item;\n  }), 0);\n\n  sum / scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245924",
          "name": "CHRB_d16a"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245931",
          "name": "CHRB_d16b"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246092,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB Theme D (AG-D1) - Performance: Company Human Rights Practices (Food and agricultural products sector)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AG_D1_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB Theme D (AG-D1) - Performance: Company Human Rights Practices (Food and agricultural products sector)",
      "question": "What does the company score on human rights practices?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This measurement theme focuses on selected human rights related practices specific to each sector. The indicators seek to assess the actual practices occurring within companies in order to implement key enablers and business processes and to prevent specific impacts on human rights particularly at risk of occurring given the sector in question.</p>\r\n<p>Many of these interconnect with the other CHRB measurement themes and company approaches to policy commitments and governance, embedding respect for human rights in culture and management systems, undertaking human rights due diligence or implementing remediation processes.</p>\r\n<p>However, these indicators aid the inter- and intra-comparative benefits of the benchmark. Complemented by the CHRB performance indicators on responses to serious allegations (measurement theme E), these indicators seek to achieve a more comprehensive overall proxy measure for the human rights performance of a company being benchmarked.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>There are 22 indicators for the food and agricultural products sector companies in Theme D.</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.1.1 Living wage</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.1.a Living wage (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.1.b Living wage (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.1.2 Aligning purchasing decisions with human rights</strong></p>\r\n<p><strong>D.1.3 Mapping and disclosing the supply chain</strong></p>\r\n<p><strong>D.1.4 Prohibition of child labour</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.4.a Age verification and corrective actions (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.4.b Age verification and corrective actions (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.1.5 Prohibition of forced labour</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.5.a Recruitment fees and costs (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.5.b Recruitment fees and costs (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.5.c Wage practices (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.5.d Wage practices (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.5.e Restrictions on workers (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.5.f Restrictions on workers (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.1.6 Freedom of association and collective bargaining </strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.6.a Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.6.b Freedom of association and collective bargaining (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.1.7 Health and safety </strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.7.a Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in own production or manufacturing perations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.7.b Fatalities, lost days, injury, occupational disease rates (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.1.8 Land rights</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.8.a Land acquisition (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.8.b Land acquisition (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.1.9 Water and sanitation</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.9.a Water and sanitation (in own production or manufacturing operations)</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.9.b Water and sanitation (in the supply chain)</p>\r\n<p><strong>D.1.10 Women's rights</strong></p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.10.a Women's rights (in own production or manufacturing operations</p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">D.1.10.b Women's rights (in the supply chain)</p>",
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Conversion for Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19246115",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245776",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19245783",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246269",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246141",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246149",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246157",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246165",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246173",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246181",
          "weight": 10
        }
      ],
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_Company_human_rights_practices.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AG_D1_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246115,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.1 Living wage+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_Living_wage+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.1 Living wage",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AG_D1_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_1_Living_wage+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246141,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.5 Prohibition of forced labour+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.5 Prohibition of forced labour",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AG_D1_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246149,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.6 Freedom of association and collective bargaining+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.6 Freedom of association and collective bargaining",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AG_D1_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_6_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246157,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.7 Health and safety+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_Health_and_safety+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.7 Health and safety",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AG_D1_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_7_Health_and_safety+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246165,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.8 Land rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_Land_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.8 Land rights",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Conversion for Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AG_D1_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_8_Land_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246173,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.9 Water and sanitation+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_Water_and_sanitation+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.9 Water and sanitation",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AG_D1_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_9_Water_and_sanitation+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246181,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.10 Women's rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_Women_s_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.10 Women's rights",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AG_D1_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_10_Women_s_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246269,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.1.4 Prohibition of child labour+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_Prohibition_of_child_labour+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.1.4 Prohibition of child labour",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 10,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AG_D1_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Food_and_agricultural_products_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_1_4_Prohibition_of_child_labour+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246274,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.1 Living wage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_Living_wage.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.1 Living wage",
      "question": "What does the company score on living wages?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.1 Living wage+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scores, sum;\n\n  scores = [CHRB_d21a, CHRB_d21b].filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Unknown\";\n  });\n\n  sum = scores.reduce((function(sum, item) {\n    return sum + item;\n  }), 0);\n\n  sum / scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245052",
          "name": "CHRB_d21a"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245059",
          "name": "CHRB_d21b"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_Living_wage+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_Living_wage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246283,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.1 Living wage+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_Living_wage+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.1 Living wage",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AP_D2_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Apparel_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_1_Living_wage+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246288,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4 Prohibition of child labour",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_Prohibition_of_child_labour.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.4 Prohibition of child labour",
      "question": "What does the company score on prohibition of child labour?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4 Prohibition of child labour+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scores, sum;\n\n  scores = [CHRB_d24a, CHRB_d24b].filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Unknown\";\n  });\n\n  sum = scores.reduce((function(sum, item) {\n    return sum + item;\n  }), 0);\n\n  sum / scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245119",
          "name": "CHRB_d24a"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245137",
          "name": "CHRB_d24b"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_Prohibition_of_child_labour+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_Prohibition_of_child_labour+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246297,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.4 Prohibition of child labour+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_Prohibition_of_child_labour+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.4 Prohibition of child labour",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AP_D2_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Apparel_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_4_Prohibition_of_child_labour+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246303,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5 Prohibition of forced labour",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5 Prohibition of forced labour",
      "question": "What does the company score on prohibition of forced labour?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5 Prohibition of forced labour+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scores, sum;\n\n  scores = [CHRB_d25a, CHRB_d25b, CHRB_d25c, CHRB_d25d, CHRB_d25e, CHRB_d25f];\n\n  scores = scores.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Unknown\";\n  });\n\n  sum = scores.reduce((function(sum, item) {\n    return sum + item;\n  }), 0);\n\n  sum / scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245192",
          "name": "CHRB_d25a"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245199",
          "name": "CHRB_d25b"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245206",
          "name": "CHRB_d25c"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245350",
          "name": "CHRB_d25d"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245220",
          "name": "CHRB_d25e"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245227",
          "name": "CHRB_d25f"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246312,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.5 Prohibition of forced labour+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.5 Prohibition of forced labour",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Tranforming formula metric to score.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AP_D2_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Apparel_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246322,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.6. Freedom of association and collective bargaining",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.6. Freedom of association and collective bargaining",
      "question": "What does the company score on freedom of association and collective bargaining?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.6. Freedom of association and collective bargaining+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scores, sum;\n\n  scores = [CHRB_d26a, CHRB_d26b].filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Unknown\";\n  });\n\n  sum = scores.reduce((function(sum, item) {\n    return sum + item;\n  }), 0);\n\n  sum / scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245357",
          "name": "CHRB_d26a"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245364",
          "name": "CHRB_d26b"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246331,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.6. Freedom of association and collective bargaining+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.6. Freedom of association and collective bargaining",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AP_D2_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Apparel_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_6_Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246350,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7 Health and safety",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_Health_and_safety.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.7 Health and safety",
      "question": "What does the company score on health and safety?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7 Health and safety+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scores, sum;\n\n  scores = [CHRB_d27a, CHRB_d27b].filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Unknown\";\n  });\n\n  sum = scores.reduce((function(sum, item) {\n    return sum + item;\n  }), 0);\n\n  sum / scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245371",
          "name": "CHRB_d27a"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245378",
          "name": "CHRB_d27b"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_Health_and_safety+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_Health_and_safety+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246359,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.7 Health and safety+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_Health_and_safety+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.7 Health and safety",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AP_D2_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Apparel_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_7_Health_and_safety+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246378,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8 Women's rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_Women_s_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.8 Women's rights",
      "question": "What does the company score on women's rights?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8 Women's rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scores, sum;\n\n  scores = [CHRB_d28a, CHRB_d28b].filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Unknown\";\n  });\n\n  sum = scores.reduce((function(sum, item) {\n    return sum + item;\n  }), 0);\n\n  sum / scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245385",
          "name": "CHRB_d28a"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245392",
          "name": "CHRB_d28b"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_Women_s_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_Women_s_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246388,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.8 Women's rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_Women_s_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.8 Women's rights",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AP_D2_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Apparel_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_8_Women_s_rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246393,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9 Working hours",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_Working_hours.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.9 Working hours",
      "question": "What does the company score on working hours?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9 Working hours+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scores, sum;\n\n  scores = [CHRB_d29a, CHRB_d29b].filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Unknown\";\n  });\n\n  sum = scores.reduce((function(sum, item) {\n    return sum + item;\n  }), 0);\n\n  sum / scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245399",
          "name": "CHRB_d29a"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245406",
          "name": "CHRB_d29b"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_Working_hours+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_Working_hours+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246403,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.2.9 Working hours+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_Working_hours+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.2.9 Working hours",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 55,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 55,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_AP_D2_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_Apparel_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_2_9_Working_hours+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246419,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5 Prohibition of forced labour",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.5 Prohibition of forced labour",
      "question": "What does the company score on prohibition of forced labour?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5 Prohibition of forced labour+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scores, sum;\n\n  scores = [CHRB_d45b, CHRB_d45d, CHRB_d45f];\n\n  scores = scores.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Unknown\";\n  });\n\n  sum = scores.reduce((function(sum, item) {\n    return sum + item;\n  }), 0);\n\n  sum / scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19244559",
          "name": "CHRB_d45b"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19244574",
          "name": "CHRB_d45d"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19244589",
          "name": "CHRB_d45f"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246428,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.5 Prohibition of forced labour+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.5 Prohibition of forced labour",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_ICT_D4_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_ICT_manufacturing_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_5_Prohibition_of_forced_labour+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246460,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10 Responsible sourcing of minerals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.10 Responsible sourcing of minerals",
      "question": "What does the company score on responsible sourcing of minerals",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10 Responsible sourcing of minerals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var scores, sum;\n\n  scores = [CHRB_d410a, CHRB_d410b, CHRB_d410c];\n\n  scores.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Unknown\";\n  });\n\n  sum = scores.reduce((function(sum, item) {\n    return sum + item;\n  }), 0);\n\n  sum / scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19244812",
          "name": "CHRB_d410a"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19244826",
          "name": "CHRB_d410b"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19244856",
          "name": "CHRB_d410c"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246469,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB D.4.10 Responsible sourcing of minerals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB D.4.10 Responsible sourcing of minerals",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_ICT_D4_Performance_Company_Human_Rights_Practices_ICT_manufacturing_sector.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_D_4_10_Responsible_sourcing_of_minerals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246492,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB Theme D - Company human rights practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_Company_human_rights_practices.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB Theme D - Company human rights practices",
      "question": "What does the company score on human rights practices?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric calculates the aggregated company score on Theme D - Company human rights practices. It combines the scores the company achieve on different sectors the company belongs to. </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Conversion for Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB Theme D - Company human rights practices+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var sum, theme_scores;\n\n  theme_scores = [theme_d_ag, theme_d_ap, theme_d_ex, theme_d_ict];\n\n  theme_scores = theme_scores.filter(function(option) {\n    return option !== \"Unknown\";\n  });\n\n  sum = theme_scores.reduce((function(sum, item) {\n    return sum + item;\n  }), 0);\n\n  sum / theme_scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19246092",
          "name": "theme_d_ag"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245413",
          "name": "theme_d_ap"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19178909",
          "name": "theme_d_ex"
        },
        {
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19245026",
          "name": "theme_d_ict"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 110,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_Company_human_rights_practices+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_Company_human_rights_practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246502,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CHRB Theme D - Company human rights practices+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_Company_human_rights_practices+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CHRB Theme D - Company human rights practices",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Safety Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Conversion for Agriculture",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use & Degradation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Rehabilitation & Restoration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Pollution & Effluents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 110,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Total_Corporate_Human_Rights_Benchmark_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_E_Response_to_serious_allegations.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CHRB_Theme_D_Company_human_rights_practices+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246857,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Commitment to Respect Human Rights+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_Respect_Human_Rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Commitment to Respect Human Rights",
      "question": "What does the company score on public commitments to respecting all internationally recognized human rights across its activities?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements: 0 (not met), 10 (fully met)</p>",
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_A_Respect_human_rights.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_A_Respecting_Human_Rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_Respect_Human_Rights+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246866,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.2.A Commitment to Respect the Human Rights of Workers+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_2_A_Commitment_to_Respect_the_Human_Rights_of_Workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.2.A Commitment to Respect the Human Rights of Workers",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_2_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_2_A_Commitment_to_Respect_the_Human_Rights_of_Workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246871,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.2.B Business Relationship Commitment to Respect the Human Rights of Workers+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_2_B_Business_Relationship_Commitment_to_Respect_the_Human_Rights_of_Workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.2.B Business Relationship Commitment to Respect the Human Rights of Workers",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_2_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_2_B_Business_Relationship_Commitment_to_Respect_the_Human_Rights_of_Workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246890,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.2 Commitment to respect the human rights of workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_2_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.2 Commitment to respect the human rights of workers",
      "question": "What does the company score on public commitments to respecting the principles concerning fundamental rights at work in the eight ILO core conventions as set\r\nout in the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>The company receives a full score if both requirements, CSI.2.A and CSI.2.B, are satisfied.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19246866",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246871",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_A_Respect_human_rights.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_A_Respecting_Human_Rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_2_Commitment_to_respect_the_human_rights_of_workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246899,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.3.A Identifying Human Rights Risk and Impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_3_A_Identifying_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.3.A Identifying Human Rights Risk and Impacts",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_3_Identifying_human_rights_risk_and_impacts.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_3_A_Identifying_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246904,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.3.B Identifying Business Partner Human Rights Risk and Impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_3_B_Identifying_Business_Partner_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.3.B Identifying Business Partner Human Rights Risk and Impacts",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_3_Identifying_human_rights_risk_and_impacts.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_3_B_Identifying_Business_Partner_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246910,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 3 Identifying human rights risk and impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_3_Identifying_human_rights_risk_and_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 3 Identifying human rights risk and impacts",
      "question": "What does the company score of proactively identification of its human rights risks and impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>The company receives a full score if both requirements, CSI.3.A and CSI.3.B, are satisfied.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19246899",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246904",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_A_Respect_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_3_Identifying_human_rights_risk_and_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246932,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.6.A Engaging with Affected and Potentially Affected Stakeholders+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_6_A_Engaging_with_Affected_and_Potentially_Affected_Stakeholders+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.6.A Engaging with Affected and Potentially Affected Stakeholders",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2108,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2027,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_6_Engaging_with_affected_and_potentially_affected_stakeholders.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_6_A_Engaging_with_Affected_and_Potentially_Affected_Stakeholders+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246936,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.6.B Engaging with Affected and Potentially Affected Stakeholders Examples+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_6_B_Engaging_with_Affected_and_Potentially_Affected_Stakeholders_Examples+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.6.B Engaging with Affected and Potentially Affected Stakeholders Examples",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2108,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2027,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_6_Engaging_with_affected_and_potentially_affected_stakeholders.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_6_B_Engaging_with_Affected_and_Potentially_Affected_Stakeholders_Examples+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246941,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 6 Engaging with affected and potentially affected stakeholders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_6_Engaging_with_affected_and_potentially_affected_stakeholders.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 6 Engaging with affected and potentially affected stakeholders",
      "question": "What does the company score on identifying and assessing its human rights risks and impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>As part of identifying and assessing its human rights risks and impacts, the company identifies and engages with stakeholders whose human rights have been or may be affected by its activities.</p>\r\n<p>The company receives a full score if both requirements, CSI.6.A and CSI.6.B, are satisfied and half score if only one is met. </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19246932",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246936",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2108,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2027,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_A_Respect_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_6_Engaging_with_affected_and_potentially_affected_stakeholders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246947,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.7.A Grievance Mechanisms for Workers+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_7_A_Grievance_Mechanisms_for_Workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.7.A Grievance Mechanisms for Workers",
      "question": "What does the company score on grievance mechanisms for workers?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>The company has one or more channel(s)/mechanism(s) (its own, third party or shared) through which workers can raise complaints or concerns, including in relation to human rights issues.</p>\r\n<p>The company can fulfil the requirements fully (full points) or partially (half points) to get points. </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Partially\":\"5\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2108,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2027,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_A_Respect_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_7_A_Grievance_Mechanisms_for_Workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246953,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.8.A Grievance Mechanisms for External Individuals and communities+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_8_A_Grievance_Mechanisms_for_External_Individuals_and_communities+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.8.A Grievance Mechanisms for External Individuals and communities",
      "question": "What does the company score on grievance mechanisms for external individuals and communities?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>The company scores full points if fully meets the following requirements or half points if partially meets it:</p>\r\n<p>The company indicates that it has one or more channel(s)/mechanism(s), or participates in a shared mechanism, accessible to all external individuals and communities who may be adversely impacted by the company (or individuals or organisations acting on their behalf or who are otherwise in a position to be aware of adverse impacts), to raise complaints or concerns.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2108,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2027,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_A_Respect_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_8_A_Grievance_Mechanisms_for_External_Individuals_and_communities+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246967,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 9 Health and safety fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_Health_and_safety_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 9 Health and safety fundamentals",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on Health and Safety fundamentals?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Does the company fulfil all the following requirements:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>CSI.9.A The company has a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect the health and safety of workers.</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">CSI.9.B</span> The company discloses quantitative information on health and safety for its workers.</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">CSI.9.C</span> The company has a publicly available statement of policy that expects its business relationships to commit to respecting the health and safety of their workers.</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">CSI.9.D</span> The company discloses how it monitors the health and safety performance of its business relationships.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 9 Health and safety fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var csi9_requirements;\n\n  csi9_requirements = [csi9a, csi9b, csi9c, csi9d];\n\n  if (csi9_requirements.every(function(element) {\n    return element === \"No\";\n  })) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (csi9_requirements.every(function(element) {\n    return element === \"Yes\";\n  })) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115075",
          "name": "csi9a"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115087",
          "name": "csi9b"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115099",
          "name": "csi9c"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115111",
          "name": "csi9d"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_Health_and_safety_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_Health_and_safety_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246978,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 9 Health and safety fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_Health_and_safety_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 9 Health and safety fundamentals",
      "question": "What does the company score on health and safety fundamentals?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_B_Provide_and_promote_decent_work.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_Health_and_safety_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246984,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 10 Living wage fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_Living_wage_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 10 Living wage fundamentals",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirement on living wage fundamentals?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Does the company fulfil all the following requirements:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>CSI.10.A The company discloses a time-bound target for paying all workers a living wage or that it has achieved paying all workers a living wage.</li>\r\n<li>CSI.10.B The Company describes how it determines a living wage for the regions where it operates.</li>\r\n<li>CSI.10.C The company describes how it works to support the payment of a living wage by its business relationships.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 10 Living wage fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var csi10_requirements;\n\n  csi10_requirements = [csi10a, csi10b, csi10c];\n\n  if (csi10_requirements.every(function(element) {\n    return element === \"No\";\n  })) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (csi10_requirements.every(function(element) {\n    return element === \"Yes\";\n  })) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115123",
          "name": "csi10a"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115134",
          "name": "csi10b"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115145",
          "name": "csi10c"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_Living_wage_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_Living_wage_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19246995,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 10 Living wage fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_Living_wage_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 10 Living wage fundamentals",
      "question": "What does the company score on living wage fundamentals?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_B_Provide_and_promote_decent_work.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_Living_wage_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247003,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 11 Working hours fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_11_Working_hours_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 11 Working hours fundamentals",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on working hours fundamentals?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Does the company fulfil all the following requirements:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>CSI.11.A The company publicly states that workers shall not be required to work more than 48 hours in a regular work week or 60 hours including overtime. </li>\r\n<li>CSI.11.B The company publicly states that all overtime work must be consensual and be paid at a premium rate. </li>\r\n<li>CSI.11.C The company has a public expectation that its business relationships shall not require workers to work more than 48 hours in a regular work week or 60 hours including overtime.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 11 Working hours fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var csi11_requirements;\n\n  csi11_requirements = [csi11a, csi11b, csi11c];\n\n  if (csi11_requirements.every(function(element) {\n    return element === \"No\";\n  })) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (csi11_requirements.every(function(element) {\n    return element === \"Yes\";\n  })) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115156",
          "name": "csi11a"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115168",
          "name": "csi11b"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115180",
          "name": "csi11c"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_11_Working_hours_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_11_Working_hours_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247014,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 11 Working hours fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_11_Working_hours_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 11 Working hours fundamentals",
      "question": "What does the company score on working hours fundamentals?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_B_Provide_and_promote_decent_work.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_11_Working_hours_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247039,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.12.A Collective Bargaining+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_12_A_Collective_Bargaining+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.12.A Collective Bargaining",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4100,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_12_Collective_bargaining_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_12_A_Collective_Bargaining+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247043,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.12.B Collective Bargaining in Business Relationships+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_12_B_Collective_Bargaining_in_Business_Relationships+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.12.B Collective Bargaining in Business Relationships",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_12_Collective_bargaining_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_12_B_Collective_Bargaining_in_Business_Relationships+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247048,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 12 Collective bargaining fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_12_Collective_bargaining_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 12 Collective bargaining fundamentals",
      "question": "What does the company score on collective bargaining fundamentals?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>The company gets full points if it meets both of the following requirements:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.12.A</strong> The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce covered by collective bargaining agreements.</li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.12.B</strong> The company describes how it works to support the practices of its business relationships in relation to freedom of association and collective bargaining.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19247039",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19247043",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 4100,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_B_Provide_and_promote_decent_work.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_B_Providing_and_promoting_decent_work.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_12_Collective_bargaining_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247055,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 13 Workforce diversity disclosure fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 13 Workforce diversity disclosure fundamentals",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil the requirements on workforce diversity disclosure fundamentals?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">Requirements under workforce diversity disclosure:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">CSI.13.A</span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\"> </span></strong>The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by age group.</li>\r\n<li><strong><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">CSI.13.B</span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\"> </span></strong>The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by gender.</li>\r\n<li><strong><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">CSI.13.C</span></strong> The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by race or ethnicity.</li>\r\n<li><strong><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">CSI.13.D</span></strong> The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by one or more additional indicators of diversity (e.g. disability, sexual identity marital family status, etc).</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+LGBT Inclusion",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Disability Inclusion"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 13 Workforce diversity disclosure fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var csi13_requirements;\n\n  csi13_requirements = [csi13a, csi13b, csi13c, csi13d];\n\n  if (csi13_requirements.every(function(element) {\n    return element === \"No\";\n  })) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (csi13_requirements.every(function(element) {\n    return element === \"Yes\";\n  })) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115214",
          "name": "csi13a"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115226",
          "name": "csi13b"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115238",
          "name": "csi13c"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115250",
          "name": "csi13d"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247066,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 13 Workforce diversity disclosure fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 13 Workforce diversity disclosure fundamentals",
      "question": "What does the company score on workforce diversity disclosure fundamentals?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">The company gets full points if fulfils all the following requirements and half points if fulfils at least one:</span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">CSI.13.A</span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\"> </span></span>The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by age group.</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">CSI.13.B</span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\"> </span></span>The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by gender.</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">CSI.13.C</span></span> The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by race or ethnicity.</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">CSI.13.D</span></span> The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by one or more additional indicators of diversity (e.g. disability, sexual identity marital family status, etc).</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+LGBT Inclusion",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Disability Inclusion"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_B_Provide_and_promote_decent_work.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247073,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 14 Gender equality and women’s empowerment fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 14 Gender equality and women’s empowerment fundamentals",
      "question": "Does the company meet the requirements on gender equality and women's empowerment fundamentals?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Requirements under gender equality and women's empowerment fundamentals:</p>\r\n<p><strong>CSI.14.A </strong>The company has a public commitment to gender equality and women's empowerment.</p>\r\n<p><strong>CSI.14.B</strong> The company discloses one or more time-bound targets on gender equality and women's empowerment.</p>\r\n<p><strong>CSI.14.C </strong>The company has at least 30% women on the highest governance body.</p>\r\n<p><strong>CSI.14.D</strong> The company discloses the ratio of the basic salary and remuneration of women to men in its total direct operations workforce for each employee category, by significant locations of operation.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 14 Gender equality and women’s empowerment fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var csi14_requirements;\n\n  csi14_requirements = [csi14a, csi14b, csi14c, csi14d];\n\n  if (csi14_requirements.every(function(element) {\n    return element === \"No\";\n  })) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (csi14_requirements.every(function(element) {\n    return element === \"Yes\";\n  })) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115262",
          "name": "csi14a"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115274",
          "name": "csi14b"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115286",
          "name": "csi14c"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115298",
          "name": "csi14d"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247084,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 14 Gender equality and women’s empowerment fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 14 Gender equality and women’s empowerment fundamentals",
      "question": "What does the company score on gender equality and women's empowerment?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>The company gets full points if fulfils all the following requirements and half points if fulfils at least one:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.14.A</strong> The company has a public commitment to gender equality and women's empowerment.</li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.14.B</strong> The company discloses one or more time-bound targets on gender equality and women's empowerment.</li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.14.C</strong> The company has at least 30% women on the highest governance body.</li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.14.D</strong> The company discloses the ratio of the basic salary and remuneration of women to men in its total direct operations workforce for each employee category, by significant locations of operation.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_B_Provide_and_promote_decent_work.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247091,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI Theme B - Provide and promote decent work",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_B_Provide_and_promote_decent_work.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI Theme B - Provide and promote decent work",
      "question": "What does the company score on providing and promoting decent work?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This indicator grouping is comrpised of the following core social indicators weighted equally to the final score:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>CSI 9 - </strong><span style=\"text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">Health and safety fundamentals</span></li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI 10 - </strong>Living wage fundamentals</li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI 11 - </strong>Working hours fundamentals</li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI 12 - </strong>Collective bargaining fundamentals</li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI 13 - </strong>Workforce diversity disclosure fundamentals</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">CSI 14 - </span><span style=\"text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">Gender equality and women’s empowerment fundamentals</span><span style=\"font-weight: bolder; color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\"> </span></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+LGBT Inclusion",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Disability Inclusion",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19246978",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246995",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19247014",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19247048",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19247066",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19247084",
          "weight": 16.67
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_Benchmark_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_B_Provide_and_promote_decent_work+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247097,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.15.A Personal Data Protection Commitment+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_15_A_Personal_Data_Protection_Commitment+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.15.A Personal Data Protection Commitment",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_15_Personal_data_protection_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_15_A_Personal_Data_Protection_Commitment+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247101,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.15.B Personal Data Protection Policy+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_15_B_Personal_Data_Protection_Policy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.15.B Personal Data Protection Policy",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_15_Personal_data_protection_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_15_B_Personal_Data_Protection_Policy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247106,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 15 Personal data protection fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_15_Personal_data_protection_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 15 Personal data protection fundamentals",
      "question": "What does the company score on personal data protection?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">The company gets full points if fulfils both requirements and half points if fulfils one:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">CSI.15.A</span></strong><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> </span><span style=\"text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">The company has a public commitment to protecting </span><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"><span style=\"text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">personal data.</span></span></li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.15.B</strong> <span style=\"text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">The company has a global publicly available </span>privacy statement in relation to the collection, sharing and access to personal data.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19247097",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19247101",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_C_Act_ethically.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_C_Acting_ethically.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_15_Personal_data_protection_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247113,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 16 Responsible tax fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_16_Responsible_tax_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 16 Responsible tax fundamentals",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on responsible tax fundamentals?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Requirements on responsible tax fundamentals:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.16.A</strong> The company has a publicly available global tax strategy, which is approved by the highest governance body.</li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.16.B</strong> A governance body or executive-level position is tasked with accountability for compliance with the company’s global tax strategy.</li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.16.C</strong> The company clearly discloses the amount of corporate income tax paid for each tax jurisdiction where the company is a resident for tax purposes.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Country-by-Country Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 16 Responsible tax fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var csi16_requirements;\n\n  csi16_requirements = [csi16a, csi16b, csi16c];\n\n  if (csi16_requirements.every(function(element) {\n    return element === \"No\";\n  })) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (csi16_requirements.every(function(element) {\n    return element === \"Yes\";\n  })) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115332",
          "name": "csi16a"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115344",
          "name": "csi16b"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115356",
          "name": "csi16c"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_16_Responsible_tax_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_16_Responsible_tax_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247124,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 16 Responsible tax fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_16_Responsible_tax_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 16 Responsible tax fundamentals",
      "question": "What does the company score on responsible tax fundamentals?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>The company score full points if it meets all requirements and half points if meets at least one. The requirments can be found below: </p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 16px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">CSI.16.A</span> The company has a publicly available global tax strategy, which is approved by the highest governance body.</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">CSI.16.B</span> A governance body or executive-level position is tasked with accountability for compliance with the company’s global tax strategy.</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">CSI.16.C</span> The company clearly discloses the amount of corporate income tax paid for each tax jurisdiction where the company is a resident for tax purposes.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Country-by-Country Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_C_Act_ethically.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_16_Responsible_tax_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247131,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 17 Anti-bribery and anti-corruption fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 17 Anti-bribery and anti-corruption fundamentals",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on anti-bribery and anti-corruption fundamentals?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Requirements on anti-bribery and anti-corruption fundamentals:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.17.A</strong> The company has a publicly available policy statement prohibiting bribery and corruption.</li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.17.B </strong>The company describes the process(es) to identify its bribery and corruption risks and impacts in specific locations or activities covering its own operations.</li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.17.C </strong>The company includes anti-bribery and anti-corruption clauses in its contracts with business relationships.</li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.17.D</strong> The company indicates that it has a confidential and anonymous channel/mechanism accessible to all stakeholders to raise bribery and corruption concerns and complaints without fear of reprisals.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 17 Anti-bribery and anti-corruption fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var csi17_requirements;\n\n  csi17_requirements = [csi17a, csi17b, csi17c, csi17d];\n\n  if (csi17_requirements.every(function(element) {\n    return element === \"No\";\n  })) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (csi17_requirements.every(function(element) {\n    return element === \"Yes\";\n  })) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115368",
          "name": "csi17a"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115380",
          "name": "csi17b"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115392",
          "name": "csi17c"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115404",
          "name": "csi17d"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247142,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 17 Anti-bribery and anti-corruption fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 17 Anti-bribery and anti-corruption fundamentals",
      "question": "What does the company score on anti-bribery and anti-corruption?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>The company score full points if it meets all requirements and half points if meets at least one. The requirments can be found below: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.17.A</strong> The company has a publicly available policy statement prohibiting bribery and corruption.</li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.17.B</strong> The company describes the process(es) to identify its bribery and corruption risks and impacts in specific locations or activities covering its own operations.</li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.17.C</strong> The company includes anti-bribery and anti-corruption clauses in its contracts with business relationships.</li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.17.D</strong> The company indicates that it has a confidential and anonymous channel/mechanism accessible to all stakeholders to raise bribery and corruption concerns and complaints without fear of reprisals.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 4102,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2295,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_C_Act_ethically.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247149,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 18 Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_18_Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 18 Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil all requirements on responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>Requirements on r<span style=\"font-size: 16px; color: var(--bs-body-color); font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">esponsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.18.A</strong> The company has a publicly available policy statement(s) (or policy(ies)) setting out its lobbying and political engagement approach.</li>\r\n<li><strong><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">CSI.18.B</span></strong> The company has a publicly available policy statement that specifies that it does not make political contributions.</li>\r\n<li><strong><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">CSI.18.C</span></strong> The company discloses its expenditures on lobbying activities.</li>\r\n<li><strong><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">CSI.18.D</span></strong> The company requires third-party lobbyists to comply with its lobbying and political engagement policy (or policies).</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 18 Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var csi18_requirements;\n\n  csi18_requirements = [csi18a, csi18b, csi18c, csi18d];\n\n  if (csi18_requirements.every(function(element) {\n    return element === \"No\";\n  })) {\n    \"No\";\n  } else if (csi18_requirements.every(function(element) {\n    return element === \"Yes\";\n  })) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"Partially\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115416",
          "name": "csi18a"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115428",
          "name": "csi18b"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115439",
          "name": "csi18c"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115451",
          "name": "csi18d"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_18_Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_18_Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247160,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 18 Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_18_Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 18 Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals",
      "question": "What does the company score on responsible lobbying and political engagement?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>The company gets full points if meets all requirements and half points if meets at least one. The requirements can be found below:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">CSI.18.A</span> The company has a publicly available policy statement(s) (or policy(ies)) setting out its lobbying and political engagement approach.</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">CSI.18.B</span> The company has a publicly available policy statement that specifies that it does not make political contributions.</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">CSI.18.C</span> The company discloses its expenditures on lobbying activities.</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">CSI.18.D</span> The company requires third-party lobbyists to comply with its lobbying and political engagement policy (or policies).</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_C_Act_ethically.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_18_Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247167,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI Theme C - Act ethically",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_C_Act_ethically.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI Theme C - Act ethically",
      "question": "What does the company score on acting ethically?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This indicator grouping is comrpised of the following core social indicators weighted equally to the final score:</p>\r\n<p><strong>CSI 15</strong> - Personal data protection fundamentals</p>\r\n<p><strong>CSI 16</strong> - Responsible tax fundamentals</p>\r\n<p><strong>CSI 17 </strong>- Anti-bribery and anti-corruption fundamentals</p>\r\n<p><strong>CSI 18</strong> - Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Country-by-Country Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19247106",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19247124",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19247142",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19247160",
          "weight": 25
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_Benchmark_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_C_Act_ethically+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247178,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 4 Assessing human rights risks and impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_4_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 4 Assessing human rights risks and impacts",
      "question": "Does the company meet all the requirements on assessing human rights risks and impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The company should meet both of the following requirements:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.4.A</strong> The company describes its process(es) for assessing its human rights risks and discloses what it considers to be its salient human rights issues. This description includes how relevant factors are taken into account, such as geographical, economic, social and other factors.</li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.4.B</strong> The company publicly discloses the results of its assessments, which may be aggregated across its operations and locations.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> If any of the indicators do not apply to the company (answer value: \"Not Applicable\"), meeting just one of the two applicable indicators is sufficient for the company to fulfill the requirements.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 4 Assessing human rights risks and impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var csi4_requirements;\n\n  csi4_requirements = [csi4a, csi4b];\n\n  csi4_requirements = csi4_requirements.filter(function(value) {\n    return value !== \"Not Applicable\";\n  });\n\n  if (csi4_requirements.some(function(element) {\n    return element === \"Yes\";\n  })) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18114979",
          "name": "csi4a"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18114991",
          "name": "csi4b"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_4_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_4_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247193,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 4 Assessing human rights risks and impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_4_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 4 Assessing human rights risks and impacts",
      "question": "What does the company score on assessing human rights risks and impacts?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">The company should meet both of the following requirements to get full points:</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 16px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">CSI.4.A</span> The company describes its process(es) for assessing its human rights risks and discloses what it considers to be its salient human rights issues. This description includes how relevant factors are taken into account, such as geographical, economic, social and other factors.</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">CSI.4.B</span> The company publicly discloses the results of its assessments, which may be aggregated across its operations and locations.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Note:</span> If any of the indicators do not apply to the company (answer value: \"Not Applicable\"), meeting just one of the two applicable indicators is sufficient for the company to get full points.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_A_Respect_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_4_Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247204,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 5 Integrating and acting on human rights risk and impact assessments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_5_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risk_and_impact_assessments.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 5 Integrating and acting on human rights risk and impact assessments",
      "question": "Does the company fulfil any of the requirements under integrating and acting on human rights risk and impact assessments?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The company should fulfil one of the following requirements:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.5.A</strong> Integrating and Acting on Human Rights Risk and Impact Assessments</li>\r\n<li><strong>CSI.5.B</strong> Integrating and Acting on Human Rights Risk and Impact Assessments Specific Conclusions</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> The company can also partially meet each requirement. If any of the indicators do not apply to the company (answer value: \"Not Applicable\"), meeting or partially meeting just one of the two applicable indicators is sufficient for the company to meet or partially meet the requirements.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 5 Integrating and acting on human rights risk and impact assessments+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var csi5_requirements;\n\n  csi5_requirements = [csi5a, csi5b];\n\n  csi5_requirements = csi5_requirements.filter(function(value) {\n    return value !== \"Not Applicable\";\n  });\n\n  if (csi5_requirements.some(function(element) {\n    return element === \"Yes\";\n  })) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (csi5_requirements.some(function(element) {\n    return element === \"Partially\";\n  })) {\n    \"Partially\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115003",
          "name": "csi5a"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115015",
          "name": "csi5b"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2108,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2027,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_5_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risk_and_impact_assessments+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_5_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risk_and_impact_assessments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247219,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI 5 Integrating and acting on human rights risk and impact assessments+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_5_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risk_and_impact_assessments+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI 5 Integrating and acting on human rights risk and impact assessments",
      "question": "What does the company score on integrating and acting on human rights risk and impact assessments?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\">The company should fulfil one of the following requirements to get full points:</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 16px;\">\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">CSI.5.A</span> Integrating and Acting on Human Rights Risk and Impact Assessments</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">CSI.5.B</span> Integrating and Acting on Human Rights Risk and Impact Assessments Specific Conclusions</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Note:</span> The company can also partially meet each requirement. If any of the indicators do not apply to the company (answer value: \"Not Applicable\"), meeting or partially meeting just one of the two applicable indicators is sufficient for the company to meet (full points) or partially meet<span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\"> </span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">(half points)</span><span style=\"color: var(--bs-body-color); font-weight: var(--bs-body-font-weight); text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\"> the requirements.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 2108,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2027,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_A_Respect_human_rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_5_Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risk_and_impact_assessments+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247327,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI Theme A - Respect human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_A_Respect_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI Theme A - Respect human rights",
      "question": "What does the company score on respecting human rights?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This indicator grouping is comrpised of the following core social indicators weighted equally to the final score:</p>\r\n<p><strong>CSI 1</strong> - Commitment to respect human rights</p>\r\n<p><strong>CSI 2</strong> - Commitment to respect the human rights of workers</p>\r\n<p><strong>CSI 3 </strong>- Identifying human rights risk and impacts</p>\r\n<p><strong>CSI 4</strong> - Assessing human rights risks and impacts</p>\r\n<p><strong>CSI 5</strong> - Integrating and acting on human rights risk and impact assessments</p>\r\n<p><strong>CSI 6</strong> - Engaging with affected and potentially affected stakeholders</p>\r\n<p><strong>CSI 7</strong> - Grievance mechanisms for workers</p>\r\n<p><strong>CSI 8</strong> - Grievance mechanisms for external individuals and communities</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19246857",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246890",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246910",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19247193",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19247219",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246941",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246947",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246953",
          "weight": 10
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_Benchmark_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_Theme_A_Respect_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19247338,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Social Benchmark Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_Benchmark_Score.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Social Benchmark Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve on the Social Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><strong>Core social indicators (CSI)</strong> – Based on pre-existing tools and frameworks, WBA defined a set of core social indicators (CSIs) that reflect the expectations and provide an assessment of whether companies are on the path towards meeting these expectations. As such, they view the CSIs as 'signposts' towards the expectations for the social transformation. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Enablers for social Tranformation:</strong></p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>Respect human rights (50%)</li>\r\n<li>Provide and promote decent work (30%)</li>\r\n<li>Act ethically (20%)</li>\r\n</ol>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Enterprise Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Working Hours",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+LGBT Inclusion",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Disability Inclusion",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Country-by-Country Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Code of Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19247327",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19247091",
          "weight": 30
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19247167",
          "weight": 20
        }
      ],
      "answer": 2106,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 2025,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_Benchmark_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490745,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Executive Pay Linked to Carbon Reduction",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Executive_Pay_Linked_to_Carbon_Reduction.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Executive Pay Linked to Carbon Reduction",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how executive pay, bonuses and/or performance reviews are tied to achieving absolute carbon reduction across the whole value chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Incentivising staff beyond the CSR/Sustainability team such as sourcing, production, buying and design to contribute towards improving environmental impacts ensures there is accountability for those within the company whose decision making has an influence.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify how executive pay, bonuses and/or performance reviews are tied to achieving absolute carbon reduction across the whole value chain.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Incentives<br>\n- Performance reviews<br>\n- Bonuses<br>\n- Executive pay<br>\n<br>\nThings to watch out for:<br>\n- We are looking for disclosure of how these incentives are implemented, it is not enough to say that they are in place<br>\n- With 'executive' we mean e.g. CEO, CFO, president",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Executive Pay Linked to Carbon Reduction+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Executive_Pay_Linked_to_Carbon_Reduction+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Executive_Pay_Linked_to_Carbon_Reduction+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490756,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Percentage of Executive Pay Linked to Carbon Reduction",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Executive_Pay_Linked_to_Carbon_Reduction.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Percentage of Executive Pay Linked to Carbon Reduction",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the percentage of executive bonus or pay linked to achieving absolute carbon reduction across the whole value chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Incentivising staff beyond the CSR/Sustainability team such as sourcing, production, buying and design to contribute towards improving environmental impacts ensures there is accountability for those within the company whose decision making has an influence.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the percentage of executive bonus or pay linked to achieving absolute carbon reduction across the whole value chain.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Incentives<br>\n- Performance reviews<br>\n- Bonuses<br>\n- Executive pay<br>\n<br>\nThings to watch out for:<br>\n- We are looking for disclosure of how these incentives are implemented, it is not enough to say that they are in place<br>\n- With 'executive' we mean e.g. CEO, CFO, president",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Percentage of Executive Pay Linked to Carbon Reduction+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Executive_Pay_Linked_to_Carbon_Reduction+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Executive_Pay_Linked_to_Carbon_Reduction+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490767,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Supplier Incentives to Improve Environmental Impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supplier_Incentives_to_Improve_Environmental_Impacts.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Supplier Incentives to Improve Environmental Impacts",
      "question": "Does the company describe how suppliers incentives are tied to improvement in environmental management?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Incentivising staff beyond the CSR/Sustainability team such as sourcing, production, buying and design to contribute towards improving environmental impacts ensures there is accountability for those within the company whose decision making has an influence. While incentivising suppliers to improve environmental performance can be accomplished through guaranteeing longer contracts, increased order size, price premiums and fewer audits can motivate suppliers to improve and drive changes in their own operations and throughout their supply chain.",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>2025 Methodology Update</strong></p>\r\n<p>Training alone is not sufficient. Please note we will only accept disclosure on incentives linked to environmental management. <br><br>Incentives could include: long-term commitments to purchase, longer contracts, increased orders, price premiums, fewer audits, access to loans with lower interest rates for loans based on the suppliers' ESG performance</p>\r\n<p>For guidance on purchasing practices, see The Common Framework for Responsible Purchasing Practices.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>Previous Methodology</strong><br>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publishes how it incorporates human rights and environmental performance into purchasing practices. Start by looking for a disclosure of how suppliers are incentivised to improve human rights impacts and environmental management.<br><br>Where to look for this information:<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>Good keywords for your searches include:<br>- Long-term supplier relation<br>- Purchasing practices<br>- Price premium<br><br>Things to watch out for:<br>- We are looking for disclosure of how these incentives are implemented, it is not enough to say that they are in place<br>- With supplier \"incentives\" we mean e.g. long-term commitments to purchase, longer contracts, increased orders, price premiums, fewer audits<br>- Training is not sufficient</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Supplier Incentives to Improve Environmental Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supplier_Incentives_to_Improve_Environmental_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supplier_Incentives_to_Improve_Environmental_Impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490783,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Renewable Energy Target (Supply Chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Renewable_Energy_Target_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Renewable Energy Target (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a renewable energy target for the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing renewable energy data shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>2025 methodology update</strong></p>\r\n<p>A renewable energy target in the supply chain is a broader goal that encompasses all forms of renewable energy used throughout the entire supply chain of a company. This target considers not only the electricity consumed but also includes other forms of energy used in various stages of the supply chain, such as heating, cooling, transportation, and manufacturing processes.</p>\r\n<p>The target should be time-bound and measurable and best practice includes details like:</p>\r\n<p>- How many suppliers are covered by the claim (% of total supply chain and regions included) </p>\r\n<p>- What share of upstream scope 3 emissions/inputs these suppliers represent</p>\r\n<p>- What share of the supplier's energy demand is covered</p>\r\n<p>Brands disclosing this level of detail will be explicitly highlighted in the research. </p>\r\n<p>Points will only be awarded if the target explicitly covers the supply chain. </p>\r\n<p><br><strong>Previous methodology</strong><br><br>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses a renewable energy target for the supply chain<br><br>Where to look for this information:<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>Good keywords for your searches include:<br>- Renewable<br>- Energy<br><br>Things to keep in mind:<br>- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Renewable Energy Target (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Renewable_Energy_Target_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Renewable_Energy_Target_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490799,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress on Renewable Energy Target (Supply Chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Renewable_Energy_Target_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress on Renewable Energy Target (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose progress on a renewable energy target for the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing renewable energy targets shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>2025 methodology update</strong></p>\r\n<p>Progress is defined as an increase in renewable energy year-on-year. If there is no time-bound and measurable target defined, no points awarded. </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Previous methodology</p>\r\n<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses progress on a renewable energy target for the supply chain.<br><br>Where to look for this information:<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>Good keywords for your searches include:<br>- Renewable<br>- Electricity<br><br>Things to keep in mind:<br>- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress on Renewable Energy Target (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Renewable_Energy_Target_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Renewable_Energy_Target_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490815,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Renewable Electricity Target (Supply Chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Renewable_Electricity_Target_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Renewable Electricity Target (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a renewable electricity target for the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing renewable energy targets shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>2025 Methodology update</strong></p>\r\n<p>A renewable electricity target specifically relates to the share or percentage of electricity consumed that should be generated from renewable sources. It focuses exclusively on the electricity component of the overall energy consumption.</p>\r\n<p>This target must be time bound and measurable, with clarity on the target's scope e.g. if it covers Tier 1 (production units, cut make trim (CMT) facilities, garment sewing, garment finishing) and Tier 2 (spinning, knitting, weaving, dyeing and wet processing, tanneries, embroidering, printing, fabric finishing, laundries, etc.) </p>\r\n<p>Targets for 100% renewable electricity should be aligned with benchmarks for decarbonising the power sector. According to the IEA (2021), advanced economies should achieve overall net-zero emissions from electricity by 2035, with the rest of the world following in 2040.</p>\r\n<p>This means that companies with the majority of their operations in OECD countries should commit to 100% renewable electricity by 2035 at the latest, while companies in other parts of the world should reach this milestone no later than 2040.</p>\r\n<p>Points will only be awarded if the target explicitly covers the supply chain. </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>Previous Methodology</strong></p>\r\n<p><br>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses progress on a renewable energy target for the supply chain.<br><br>Where to look for this information:<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>Good keywords for your searches include:<br>- Renewable<br>- Electricity<br><br>Things to keep in mind:<br>- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Renewable Electricity Target (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Renewable_Electricity_Target_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Renewable_Electricity_Target_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490826,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Fossil Fuel Phase-Out Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fossil_Fuel_Phase_Out_Target.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Fossil Fuel Phase-Out Target",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a target to phase-out combustion of thermal coal (or other fossil fuels)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing carbon emissions data shows that a company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses a target to phase-out combustion of thermal coal (or other fossil fuels)<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Coal<br>\n- Fossil Fuel<br>\n- Target",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Fossil Fuel Phase-Out Target+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fossil_Fuel_Phase_Out_Target+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fossil_Fuel_Phase_Out_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490837,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress on Fossil Fuel Phase-Out Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Fossil_Fuel_Phase_Out_Target.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress on Fossil Fuel Phase-Out Target",
      "question": "Does the company disclose progress on a target to phase-out combustion of thermal coal (or other fossil fuels)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing carbon emissions data shows that a company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses progress on a target to phase-out combustion of thermal coal (or other fossil fuels).<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Coal<br>\n- Fossil Fuel<br>\n- Target",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress on Fossil Fuel Phase-Out Target+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Fossil_Fuel_Phase_Out_Target+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Fossil_Fuel_Phase_Out_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490853,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Electrify Manufacturing Processes Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Electrify_Manufacturing_Processes_Target.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Electrify Manufacturing Processes Target",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a target to electrify all energy-intensive processes in garment manufacturing where feasible?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing renewable energy targets shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses a target to electrify all energy-intensive processes in garment manufacturing where feasible.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Renewable<br>\n- Electricity<br>\n<br>\nThings to keep in mind:<br>\n- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>\n- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Electrify Manufacturing Processes Target+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Electrify_Manufacturing_Processes_Target+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Electrify_Manufacturing_Processes_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490864,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress on Electrify Manufacturing Processes Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Electrify_Manufacturing_Processes_Target.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress on Electrify Manufacturing Processes Target",
      "question": "Does the company disclose progress on a target to electrify all energy-intensive processes in garment manufacturing where feasible?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing renewable energy targets shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses progress on a target to electrify all energy-intensive processes in garment manufacturing where feasible.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Renewable<br>\n- Electricity<br>\n<br>\nThings to keep in mind:<br>\n- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>\n- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress on Electrify Manufacturing Processes Target+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Electrify_Manufacturing_Processes_Target+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Electrify_Manufacturing_Processes_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490875,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Scope 3 Emissions Breakdown",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Scope_3_Emissions_Breakdown.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Scope 3 Emissions Breakdown",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a breakdown of Scope 3 emissions by country, volume and emission type?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing carbon emissions data shows that a company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>2025 Methodology update</strong></p>\r\n<p>Brands should specify whether the calculation is based on location-based or market-based data. We are only awarding points if disclosure includes all criteria. </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>Previous Methodology</strong></p>\r\n<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses a breakdown of Scope 3 emissions by country, volume and emission type<br><br>Where to look for this information:<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>Good keywords for your searches include:<br>- Scope 3<br>- Emissions breakdown</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Scope 3 Emissions Breakdown+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Scope_3_Emissions_Breakdown+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Scope_3_Emissions_Breakdown+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490891,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Renewable Energy Definition",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Renewable_Energy_Definition.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Renewable Energy Definition",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how the company defines renewable energy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing detailed renewable energy information shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses progress on a target to electrify all energy-intensive processes in garment manufacturing where feasible.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Renewable energy<br>\n<br>\nThings to keep in mind:<br>\n- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>\n- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Renewable Energy Definition+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Renewable_Energy_Definition+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Renewable_Energy_Definition+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490902,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Energy Consumption Breakdown (Own Operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_Own_Operations.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Energy Consumption Breakdown (Own Operations)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a breakdown of the energy consumption profile in company's owned and operated facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing energy breakdown data informs to what extent the company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses a breakdown of the energy consumption profile in company's owned and operated facilities<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Energy consumption<br>\n- Consumtion profile<br>\n<br>\nThings to keep in mind:<br>\n- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>\n- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Energy Consumption Breakdown (Own Operations)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_Own_Operations+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_Own_Operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490913,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Energy Consumption Breakdown (Supply Chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Energy Consumption Breakdown (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a breakdown of the energy consumption profile in the company's supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing energy breakdown data informs to what extent the company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses a breakdown of the energy consumption profile in the company's supply chain.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Energy consumption<br>\n- Consumtion profile<br>\n<br>\nThings to keep in mind:<br>\n- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>\n- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Energy Consumption Breakdown (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490924,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Energy Consumption Breakdown by Country (Supply Chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_by_Country_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Energy Consumption Breakdown by Country (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a breakdown of the energy consumption by country in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing energy breakdown data informs to what extent the company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses a breakdown of the energy consumption by country in the supply chain.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Energy consumption<br>\n- Consumtion profile<br>\n<br>\nThings to keep in mind:<br>\n- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>\n- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Energy Consumption Breakdown by Country (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_by_Country_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_by_Country_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490935,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Energy Consumption Breakdown by Process (Supply Chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_by_Process_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Energy Consumption Breakdown by Process (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a breakdown of energy consumption by process in the company's supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing energy breakdown data informs to what extent the company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses a breakdown of energy consumption by process in the company's supply chain.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Energy consumption<br>\n- Consumtion profile<br>\n<br>\nThings to keep in mind:<br>\n- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>\n- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Energy Consumption Breakdown by Process (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_by_Process_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_by_Process_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490946,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Electricity Consumption Breakdown (Supply Chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Electricity_Consumption_Breakdown_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Electricity Consumption Breakdown (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its supply chain electricity consumption profile?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing energy breakdown data informs to what extent the company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses its supply chain electricity consumption profile.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Energy consumption<br>\n- Consumtion profile<br>\n<br>\nThings to keep in mind:<br>\n- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>\n- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Electricity Consumption Breakdown (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Electricity_Consumption_Breakdown_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Electricity_Consumption_Breakdown_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490962,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Energy Procurement Type Breakdown (Own Operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Procurement_Type_Breakdown_Own_Operations.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Energy Procurement Type Breakdown (Own Operations)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a detailed breakdown of energy procurement type in their company’s owned and operated facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing energy breakdown data informs to what extent the company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses a detailed breakdown of energy procurement type in their company’s owned and operated facilities.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Energy consumption<br>\n- Consumtion profile<br>\n<br>\nThings to keep in mind:<br>\n- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>\n- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Energy Procurement Type Breakdown (Own Operations)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Procurement_Type_Breakdown_Own_Operations+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Procurement_Type_Breakdown_Own_Operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490973,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Energy Procurement Type Breakdown (Supply Chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Procurement_Type_Breakdown_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Energy Procurement Type Breakdown (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a detailed breakdown of energy procurement type in their supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing energy breakdown data informs to what extent the company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses a detailed breakdown of energy procurement type in their supply chain.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Energy consumption<br>\n- Consumtion profile<br>\n<br>\nThings to keep in mind:<br>\n- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>\n- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Energy Procurement Type Breakdown (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Procurement_Type_Breakdown_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Procurement_Type_Breakdown_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490984,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Electricity Consumption Matched to Renewable Energy Generation (Supply Chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Electricity_Consumption_Matched_to_Renewable_Energy_Generation_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Electricity Consumption Matched to Renewable Energy Generation (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the share/percentage of supply chain electricity consumption matched to renewable generation on an annual basis?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing detailed renewable energy information shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the share/percentage of supply chain electricity consumption matched to renewable generation on an annual basis.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Renewable<br>\n- Matching<br>\n<br>\nThings to keep in mind:<br>\n- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>\n- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Electricity Consumption Matched to Renewable Energy Generation (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Electricity_Consumption_Matched_to_Renewable_Energy_Generation_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Electricity_Consumption_Matched_to_Renewable_Energy_Generation_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19490995,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses 24/7 Hourly Matching of Electricity Consumption (Supply Chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_24_7_Hourly_Matching_of_Electricity_Consumption_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses 24/7 Hourly Matching of Electricity Consumption (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the share/percentage of supply chain electricity consumption matched on an hourly basis (24/7 hourly matching)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing detailed renewable energy information shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>2025 Methodology update</strong></p>\r\n<p>Though brands may make claims of “100% renewable”, many may still be reliant on fossil fuels for a significant portion of their electricity production per day, enabling substantial underreporting of real-world emissions. The lack of data about the time of electricity production on Energy Attribute Certificates is a key root cause of this issue. The emerging scientific literature on hourly matching demonstrates clearly that its potential for responding to the challenges of the electricity system and ultimately decreasing emissions is far superior to the outcomes of annual matching. Companies that commit to match their electricity consumption on an hourly basis provide a critical demand pull for additional and novel renewable energy generation and storage technologies that will be necessary to completely decarbonise power systems in the most challenging times and locations (New Climate Institute). </p>\r\n<p>The United Nation's 24/7 Carbon-Free Energy Compact principles may help establish a set on principles for 24/7 renewable electricity. </p>\r\n<p>For Brands committed to RE100 - note that in 2023, RE100 updated its reporting guidance to include 24/7, rewarded with additional recognition. See pg. 6 of Guidance.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>Previous Methodology</strong></p>\r\n<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the share/percentage of supply chain electricity consumption matched on an hourly basis (24/7 hourly matching).<br><br>Where to look for this information:<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>Good keywords for your searches include:<br>- Renewable<br>- Matching<br>- 24/7 hourly matching<br><br>Things to keep in mind:<br>- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses 24/7 Hourly Matching of Electricity Consumption (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_24_7_Hourly_Matching_of_Electricity_Consumption_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_24_7_Hourly_Matching_of_Electricity_Consumption_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19491006,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Support for Renewable Electricity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Support_for_Renewable_Electricity.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Support for Renewable Electricity",
      "question": "Does the company disclose details on the renewable electricity constructs it plans to pursue to meet its future renewable electricity target or any other measures to support renewable electricity procurement in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing detailed renewable energy information shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company details on the renewable electricity constructs it plans to pursue to meet its future renewable electricity target or any other measures to support renewable electricity procurement in the supply chain.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Renewable<br>\n- Electricity procurement<br>\n<br>\nThings to keep in mind:<br>\n- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>\n- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Support for Renewable Electricity+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Support_for_Renewable_Electricity+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Support_for_Renewable_Electricity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19491022,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Climate-Related Risk Process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Climate_Related_Risk_Process.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Climate-Related Risk Process",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the process(es) for identifying, assessing and responding to climate-related risks including details of risks identified with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on their business?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Environmental due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the process(es) for identifying, assessing and responding to climate-related risks including details of risks identified with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on their business<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Risk<br>\n- Due diligence<br>\n- Climate-related",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Climate-Related Risk Process+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Climate_Related_Risk_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Climate_Related_Risk_Process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19491033,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Details on Climate-Related Risks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Details_on_Climate_Related_Risks.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Details on Climate-Related Risks",
      "question": "Does the company provide details of climate-related risks identified with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on their business?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Environmental due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company provides details of risks identified with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business.This indicator is aligned with the CDP questionnaire and Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).<br><br>Where to look for this information:<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>Good keywords for your searches include:<br>- Risk<br>- Due diligence<br>- Climate-related</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Details on Climate-Related Risks+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Details_on_Climate_Related_Risks+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Details_on_Climate_Related_Risks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19491044,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Annual Renewable Energy Investment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Annual_Renewable_Energy_Investment.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Annual Renewable Energy Investment",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the level of annual investment in renewable energy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing detailed renewable energy information shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses the level of annual investment in renewable energy<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Renewable investment<br>\n- Investment",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Annual Renewable Energy Investment+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Annual_Renewable_Energy_Investment+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Annual_Renewable_Energy_Investment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19491055,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Scale of Renewable Energy Support",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Scale_of_Renewable_Energy_Support.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Scale of Renewable Energy Support",
      "question": "Does the company disclose details on the scale of renewable energy support offered?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing detailed renewable energy information shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses details on the scale of renewable energy support offered<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Renewable<br>\n- Renewable investment",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Scale of Renewable Energy Support+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Scale_of_Renewable_Energy_Support+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Scale_of_Renewable_Energy_Support+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19491066,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Carbon Pricing",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Pricing.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Carbon Pricing",
      "question": "Does the company disclose if the company places an internal price on carbon and what that price is?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Setting and publishing carbon pricing data informs to what extent the company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses if the company places an internal price on carbon and what that price is. This indicator is aligned with CDP. Please refer to <a href=\"https://cdn.cdp.net/cdp-production/cms/reports/documents/000/006/374/original/ICP_White_paper_Final_%281%29.pdf\" style=\"text-decoration: none;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #1155cc; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: underline; -webkit-text-decoration-skip: none; text-decoration-skip-ink: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">this</span></a><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> </span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">resource for further information.</span></p>\r\n<p>Where to look for this information:<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>Good keywords for your searches include:<br>- Carbon price / pricing</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Carbon Pricing+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Pricing+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Pricing+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19491082,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Energy Efficiency Investments (Supply Chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Energy_Efficiency_Investments_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Energy Efficiency Investments (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how the brand invests in energy efficient solutions at supplier level?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Investment in energy efficiency at a supply chain level shows that a company is taking responsibility for and working to lower its environmental impact.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify how the brand invests in energy efficient solutions at supplier level.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Energy efficiency / efficient",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Energy Efficiency Investments (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Energy_Efficiency_Investments_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Energy_Efficiency_Investments_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19491093,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Just Transition Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Just_Transition_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Just Transition Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company publicly commit to a Just Transition strategy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "A Just Transition strategy show that brands are acknowledging the need for equitable decision-making models when making changes to their supply chain procurement in line with climate targets to ensure adequate protections for workers.",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>2025 Methodology update</strong></p>\r\n<p>This indicator is aligned with Climate Action 100+, the World Benchmarking Alliance &amp; the We Mean Business Coalition.</p>\r\n<p>This commitment should:</p>\r\n<p>- Be publicly accessible and approved at the most senior leadership levels.</p>\r\n<p>- Be communicated internally and externally, including to suppliers and their representatives.</p>\r\n<p>- Reference key frameworks such as the Paris Agreement on Climate Change and/or the International Labour Organisation’s (ILO’s) Just Transition Guidelines.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>Previous Methodology</strong></p>\r\n<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company publicly commits to a Just Transition strategy.<br><br>Where to look for this information:<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>Good keywords for your searches include:<br>- Just Transition<br>- Equitable</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion in Transition Planning",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Just Transition Commitment+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Just_Transition_Commitment+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Just_Transition_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19491104,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Supplier Engagement on Climate Target Setting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supplier_Engagement_on_Climate_Target_Setting.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Supplier Engagement on Climate Target Setting",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how suppliers were consulted in the establishment of climate targets that impact their supply chains?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Environmental due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>2025 Methodology update</strong></p>\r\n<p>Fashion brands often impose top-down targets on suppliers without meaningful consultation. Disclosure should explain how suppliers co-create climate targets and ensure these efforts aim to cease, prevent, or mitigate potential adverse impacts on suppliers. </p>\r\n<p>Brands could disclose:</p>\r\n<p>- How suppliers are meaningfully consulted in setting climate targets (e.g. net zero, emissions reduction) that affect the supply chain.</p>\r\n<p>- Whether climate goals are co-created to avoid adverse impacts on suppliers.</p>\r\n<p>- Support provided to help suppliers set their own, context-specific targets, including verified ones (e.g. SBTi-approved).</p>\r\n<p>- Evidence of a shift from top-down targets to supplier-led, locally appropriate approaches.</p>\r\n<p>The ILO-ITUC Issue Paper, 'Social dialogue as a driver and governance instrument for sustainable development' is a useful resource on this process. </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>Previous Methodology</strong></p>\r\n<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses how suppliers were consulted in the establishment of climate targets that impact their supply chains.<br><br>Where to look for this information:<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>Good keywords for your searches include:<br>- Stakeholder engagement<br>- Supplier consultations</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Supplier Engagement on Climate Target Setting+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supplier_Engagement_on_Climate_Target_Setting+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supplier_Engagement_on_Climate_Target_Setting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19491115,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Supplier Engagement in Climate Adaptation Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supplier_Engagement_in_Climate_Adaptation_Strategy.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Supplier Engagement in Climate Adaptation Strategy",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how the brand is engaging with suppliers across the supply chain to co-create local solutions and mitigations to climate adaptation, sensitive to local contexts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Environmental due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>2025 Methodology update</strong></p>\r\n<p>The focus is on fostering social dialogue with existing suppliers to collaboratively develop climate adaptation strategies, resilience measures, and local solutions, rather than brands relocating sourcing to new facilities. Brands should disclose how they work with suppliers to adapt facilities to climate risks (e.g., flood defences) and invest in the green transition.</p>\r\n<p>Research on potential adaptation measures can be found on pages 35-36 of the Higher Ground Report.</p>\r\n<p>The BSR Just Transition Planning Toolkit and the ILO-ITUC Issue Paper, 'Social dialogue as a driver and governance instrument for sustainable development', offer additional resources for supporting social dialogue and inclusive, equitable transitions.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>Previous Methodology</strong></p>\r\n<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses how the brand is engaging with suppliers across the supply chain to co-create local solutions and mitigations to climate adaptation, sensitive to local contexts<br><br>Where to look for this information:<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>Good keywords for your searches include:<br>- Stakeholder engagement<br>- Supplier consultations</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Supplier Engagement in Climate Adaptation Strategy+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supplier_Engagement_in_Climate_Adaptation_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supplier_Engagement_in_Climate_Adaptation_Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19491126,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Affected Stakeholder Engagement on Climate Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Affected_Stakeholder_Engagement_on_Climate_Strategy.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Affected Stakeholder Engagement on Climate Strategy",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how the brand is engaging with workers, local communities, and other affected stakeholders to identify the impacts of the climate strategy and co-create local solutions and mitigations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "A Just Transition approach show that brands are acknowledging the need for equitable decision-making models when making changes to their supply chain procurement in line with climate targets to ensure adequate protections for workers.",
      "methodology": "In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses how the brand is engaging with workers, local communities, and other affected stakeholders to identify the impacts of the climate strategy and co-create local solutions and mitigations.<br>\n<br>\nWhere to look for this information:<br>\n- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>\n- Company documents<br>\n- Company policies<br>\n- Company websites<br>\n- Company code of conduct<br>\n- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>\n<br>\nGood keywords for your searches include:<br>\n- Just Transition<br>\n- Stakeholder engagement<br>\n- Mitigation",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Affected Stakeholder Engagement on Climate Strategy+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Affected_Stakeholder_Engagement_on_Climate_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Affected_Stakeholder_Engagement_on_Climate_Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19491142,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Efforts to Upskill Supply Chain Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Efforts_to_Upskill_Supply_Chain_Workers.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Efforts to Upskill Supply Chain Workers",
      "question": "Does the company disclose brand efforts to retain and re- and/or up-skill supply chain workers whose jobs are at risk?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "A Just Transition approach show that brands are acknowledging the need for equitable decision-making models when making changes to their supply chain procurement in line with climate targets to ensure adequate protections for workers.",
      "methodology": "<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses brand efforts to retain and re- and/or up-skill supply chain workers whose jobs are at risk. This indicator aligns with the World Benchmarking Alliance and Climate Action 100+. Brands should disclose specific initiatives to support supply chain workers facing job displacement due to the climate crisis, focusing on efforts to retain, retrain, or upskill them for new roles within the brand's operations or broader industries. <br><br>Where to look for this information:<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>Good keywords for your searches include:<br>- Just Transition<br>- Stakeholder engagement<br>- Up-skill / upskill</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Efforts to Upskill Supply Chain Workers+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Efforts_to_Upskill_Supply_Chain_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Efforts_to_Upskill_Supply_Chain_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19491153,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Efforts to Compensate Workers Impacted by Climate Crisis",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Efforts_to_Compensate_Workers_Impacted_by_Climate_Crisis.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Efforts to Compensate Workers Impacted by Climate Crisis",
      "question": "Does the company disclose efforts to financially compensate workers affected by the impacts of the climate crisis and/or their decarbonisation strategy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "A Just Transition approach show that brands are acknowledging the need for equitable decision-making models when making changes to their supply chain procurement in line with climate targets to ensure adequate protections for workers.",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>2025 Methodology update</strong><br>For example: farmers impacted by the floods in Pakistan or garment workers by the earthquakes in Turkey. This also applies to workers in facilities (like factories) that are exited in favour of an alternative facility in line with the company's climate strategy. </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Under the UNGPs and OECD guidelines, the need for remediation must also be duly considered, even where supplier exit has taken place. In other words, exiting a facility due to a climate strategy or because of the impact of a climate hazard (flood, earthquake etc) does not exempt companies from their responsibility to remedy any harm they caused or to which they contributed. Remediation usually involves providing financial compensation and support to the workers. \"</p>\r\n<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses efforts to financially compensate workers affected by the impacts of the climate crisis and/or their decarbonisation strategy.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Previous Methodology</strong><br>Where to look for this information:<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>Good keywords for your searches include:<br>- Just Transition<br>- Decarbonisation / Decarbonization<br>- Compensation</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Efforts to Compensate Workers Impacted by Climate Crisis+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Efforts_to_Compensate_Workers_Impacted_by_Climate_Crisis+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Efforts_to_Compensate_Workers_Impacted_by_Climate_Crisis+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19491164,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Evidence of Renewable Energy Advocacy (Supply Chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Evidence_of_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Evidence of Renewable Energy Advocacy (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose evidence of past and current renewable energy advocacy in their supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing detailed renewable energy information shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>2025 Methodology update</strong></p>\r\n<p>Many garment-producing countries face significant barriers to generating and accessing renewable energy. We are seeking evidence of major fashion brands taking action to support national or sub-national renewable energy or greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets, as well as policies aimed at expanding access to renewable electricity procurement options in key supply chain markets.</p>\r\n<p>Major fashion brands should use their substantial purchasing power within supply chains to advocate for an end to investments in coal power stations or fossil fuel infrastructure linked to their operations in regions where clean energy procurement options are unavailable.</p>\r\n<p>We are specifically looking for evidence of the following actions:</p>\r\n<p>- Advocacy for an end to investments in coal power stations or fossil fuel infrastructure connected to supply chains.</p>\r\n<p>- Support for national or sub-national renewable energy or GHG reduction targets.</p>\r\n<p>- Support for green-energy-focused economic recovery packages.</p>\r\n<p>- Support for policies that enhance access to renewable electricity procurement options in key supply chain markets.</p>\r\n<p>Please provide links to published letters or other relevant examples where available, along with dates and details of involvement.</p>\r\n<p>Refer to these examples: Statement of Mutual Aspiration in Indonesia and Joint Statement of Support for High-Ambition Power Development Planning in Vietnam</p>\r\n<p>Brands who engage in 24/7 Coalitions e.g. Climate Group's 24/7 Carbon-Free Coalition, UN Energy's 24/7 Carbon-free Energy Compact will be awarded points if they are publicly communicated. </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>Previous Methodology</strong></p>\r\n<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses evidence of past and current renewable energy advocacy in their supply chain.<br><br>Where to look for this information:<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>Good keywords for your searches include:<br>- Renewable energy</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Evidence of Renewable Energy Advocacy (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Evidence_of_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Evidence_of_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19491175,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Outcome of Renewable Energy Advocacy (Supply Chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Outcome_of_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Outcome of Renewable Energy Advocacy (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose outcomes of past and current renewable energy advocacy in their supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing detailed renewable energy information shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>2025 Methodology update</strong></p>\r\n<p>Brands should disclose the outcomes of their advocacy for renewable energy within supply chains, including specific actions taken by policymakers or other stakeholders following these efforts. For example, this could include the implementation of renewable energy initiatives in factories in garment-producing countries, such as government funding, policy changes, or the adoption of renewable energy solutions. The disclosure should demonstrate how these outcomes contribute to the brand’s sustainability objectives and support the transition to renewable energy across the supply chain.<br><br><strong>Previous Methodology</strong><br>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses outcomes of past and current renewable energy advocacy in their supply chain<br><br>Where to look for this information:<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>Good keywords for your searches include:<br>- Renewable energy</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Outcome of Renewable Energy Advocacy (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Outcome_of_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Outcome_of_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19491186,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Commitment on State-Imposed Forced Labour in Supply Chain (Renewable Energy)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Commitment_on_State_Imposed_Forced_Labour_in_Supply_Chain_Renewable_Energy.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Commitment on State-Imposed Forced Labour in Supply Chain (Renewable Energy)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a public commitment to ensure that suppliers transitioning to renewable energy do not procure solar panels made with high-risk of State-Imposed Forced Labour?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "State-imposed forced labour is when governments force their citizens to work to for economic development, to punish political dissents, or to discriminate against minorities. When state-imposed forced labour occurs, it becomes impossible for brands to conduct third-party audits or due diligence to verify the absence of forced labour, prevent or mitigate forced labour, or remediate forced labour.",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>2025 Methodology update</strong></p>\r\n<p>Many suppliers within global supply chains are transitioning to solar energy to meet climate goals. However, the production of solar panels and their components, particularly in regions like the Uyghur Region (Xinjiang, northwest China), is linked to systemic state-imposed forced labour (SIFL). It is critical for brands to ensure that their suppliers are aware of these risks and take proactive steps to avoid sourcing from these regions. Brands must set clear expectations for suppliers while also upholding these commitments within their own operations. In addition to exposure to egregious human rights violations, the Uyghur region’s technology industry is heavily reliant on coal-based energy. </p>\r\n<p>Commitment Requirements:</p>\r\n<p>- Brands must make a public commitment to ensure that no solar panels or components associated with SIFL are procured, either within their own operations or by suppliers in the supply chain.</p>\r\n<p>- This expectation must be communicated clearly to suppliers as part of their renewable energy transition strategy.</p>\r\n<p>Resources:</p>\r\n<p>This guidance is based on the ‘Respecting Rights in Renewable Energy’ report. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Previous Methodology</strong></p>\r\n<p>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses a public commitment to ensure that suppliers transitioning to renewable energy do not procure solar panels made with high-risk of State-Imposed Forced Labour.<br><br>Where to look for this information:<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>Good keywords for your searches include:<br>- Forced labour</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Commitment on State-Imposed Forced Labour in Supply Chain (Renewable Energy)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Commitment_on_State_Imposed_Forced_Labour_in_Supply_Chain_Renewable_Energy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Commitment_on_State_Imposed_Forced_Labour_in_Supply_Chain_Renewable_Energy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575303,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Executive Pay Linked to Carbon Reduction+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Executive_Pay_Linked_to_Carbon_Reduction+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Executive Pay Linked to Carbon Reduction",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Incentivising staff beyond the CSR/Sustainability team such as sourcing, production, buying and design to contribute towards improving environmental impacts ensures there is accountability for those within the company whose decision making has an influence.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_1_Governance.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Executive_Pay_Linked_to_Carbon_Reduction+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575311,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Percentage of Executive Pay Linked to Carbon Reduction+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Executive_Pay_Linked_to_Carbon_Reduction+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Percentage of Executive Pay Linked to Carbon Reduction",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Incentivising staff beyond the CSR/Sustainability team such as sourcing, production, buying and design to contribute towards improving environmental impacts ensures there is accountability for those within the company whose decision making has an influence.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_1_Governance.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_1_Governance_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Percentage_of_Executive_Pay_Linked_to_Carbon_Reduction+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575318,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Supplier Incentives to Improve Environmental Impacts+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supplier_Incentives_to_Improve_Environmental_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Supplier Incentives to Improve Environmental Impacts",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Incentivising staff beyond the CSR/Sustainability team such as sourcing, production, buying and design to contribute towards improving environmental impacts ensures there is accountability for those within the company whose decision making has an influence. While incentivising suppliers to improve environmental performance can be accomplished through guaranteeing longer contracts, increased order size, price premiums and fewer audits can motivate suppliers to improve and drive changes in their own operations and throughout their supply chain.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_1_Governance.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_1_Governance_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Supplier_Incentives_to_Improve_Environmental_Impacts+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575325,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Renewable Energy Target (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Renewable_Energy_Target_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Renewable Energy Target (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing renewable energy data shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Renewable_Energy_Target_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575332,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress on Renewable Energy Target (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Renewable_Energy_Target_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress on Renewable Energy Target (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing renewable energy targets shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Renewable_Energy_Target_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575339,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Renewable Electricity Target (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Renewable_Electricity_Target_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Renewable Electricity Target (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing renewable energy targets shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Renewable_Electricity_Target_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575346,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Fossil Fuel Phase-Out Target+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fossil_Fuel_Phase_Out_Target+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Fossil Fuel Phase-Out Target",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing carbon emissions data shows that a company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fossil_Fuel_Phase_Out_Target+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575353,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress on Fossil Fuel Phase-Out Target+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Fossil_Fuel_Phase_Out_Target+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress on Fossil Fuel Phase-Out Target",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing carbon emissions data shows that a company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Fossil_Fuel_Phase_Out_Target+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575360,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Electrify Manufacturing Processes Target+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Electrify_Manufacturing_Processes_Target+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Electrify Manufacturing Processes Target",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing renewable energy targets shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Electrify_Manufacturing_Processes_Target+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575367,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Progress on Electrify Manufacturing Processes Target+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Electrify_Manufacturing_Processes_Target+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Progress on Electrify Manufacturing Processes Target",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing renewable energy targets shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Progress_on_Electrify_Manufacturing_Processes_Target+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575374,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Scope 3 Emissions Breakdown+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Scope_3_Emissions_Breakdown+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Scope 3 Emissions Breakdown",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing carbon emissions data shows that a company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Greenhouse_Gas_GHG_Footprint.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Greenhouse_Gas_GHG_Footprint_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Scope_3_Emissions_Breakdown+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575381,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Renewable Energy Definition+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Renewable_Energy_Definition+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Renewable Energy Definition",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing detailed renewable energy information shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Energy_Consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Renewable_Energy_Definition+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575388,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Energy Consumption Breakdown (Own Operations)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_Own_Operations+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Energy Consumption Breakdown (Own Operations)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing energy breakdown data informs to what extent the company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Energy_Consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_Own_Operations+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575395,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Energy Consumption Breakdown (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Energy Consumption Breakdown (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing energy breakdown data informs to what extent the company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Energy_Consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575402,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Energy Consumption Breakdown by Country (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_by_Country_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Energy Consumption Breakdown by Country (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing energy breakdown data informs to what extent the company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Energy_Consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_by_Country_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575409,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Energy Consumption Breakdown by Process (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_by_Process_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Energy Consumption Breakdown by Process (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing energy breakdown data informs to what extent the company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Energy_Consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Consumption_Breakdown_by_Process_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575416,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Electricity Consumption Breakdown (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Electricity_Consumption_Breakdown_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Electricity Consumption Breakdown (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing energy breakdown data informs to what extent the company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Energy_Consumption.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Electricity_Consumption_Breakdown_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575423,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Energy Procurement Type Breakdown (Own Operations)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Procurement_Type_Breakdown_Own_Operations+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Energy Procurement Type Breakdown (Own Operations)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing energy breakdown data informs to what extent the company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Energy_Procurement_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Procurement_Type_Breakdown_Own_Operations+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575430,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Energy Procurement Type Breakdown (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Procurement_Type_Breakdown_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Energy Procurement Type Breakdown (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing energy breakdown data informs to what extent the company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Energy_Procurement_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_Procurement_Type_Breakdown_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575437,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Electricity Consumption Matched to Renewable Energy Generation (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Electricity_Consumption_Matched_to_Renewable_Energy_Generation_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Electricity Consumption Matched to Renewable Energy Generation (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing detailed renewable energy information shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Energy_Procurement_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Electricity_Consumption_Matched_to_Renewable_Energy_Generation_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575444,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses 24/7 Hourly Matching of Electricity Consumption (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_24_7_Hourly_Matching_of_Electricity_Consumption_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses 24/7 Hourly Matching of Electricity Consumption (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing detailed renewable energy information shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Energy_Procurement_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Energy_Procurement_Score_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_24_7_Hourly_Matching_of_Electricity_Consumption_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575451,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Support for Renewable Electricity+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Support_for_Renewable_Electricity+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Support for Renewable Electricity",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing detailed renewable energy information shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Energy_Procurement_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Support_for_Renewable_Electricity+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575458,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Climate-Related Risk Process+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Climate_Related_Risk_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Climate-Related Risk Process",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Environmental due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Financing_Decarbonisation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Climate_Related_Risk_Process+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575465,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Details on Climate-Related Risks+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Details_on_Climate_Related_Risks+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Details on Climate-Related Risks",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Environmental due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Financing_Decarbonisation_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Financing_Decarbonisation_Score_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Details_on_Climate_Related_Risks+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575472,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Annual Renewable Energy Investment+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Annual_Renewable_Energy_Investment+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Annual Renewable Energy Investment",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing detailed renewable energy information shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Financing_Decarbonisation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Annual_Renewable_Energy_Investment+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575479,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Scale of Renewable Energy Support+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Scale_of_Renewable_Energy_Support+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Scale of Renewable Energy Support",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing detailed renewable energy information shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Financing_Decarbonisation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Scale_of_Renewable_Energy_Support+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575486,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Carbon Pricing+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Pricing+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Carbon Pricing",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Setting and publishing carbon pricing data informs to what extent the company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Financing_Decarbonisation_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_1_Governance_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Pricing+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575493,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Energy Efficiency Investments (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Energy_Efficiency_Investments_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Energy Efficiency Investments (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Investment in energy efficiency at a supply chain level shows that a company is taking responsibility for and working to lower its environmental impact.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Financing_Decarbonisation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Energy_Efficiency_Investments_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575500,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Just Transition Commitment+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Just_Transition_Commitment+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Just Transition Commitment",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "A Just Transition strategy show that brands are acknowledging the need for equitable decision-making models when making changes to their supply chain procurement in line with climate targets to ensure adequate protections for workers.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion in Transition Planning",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Just_Transition_Commitment+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575507,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Supplier Engagement on Climate Target Setting+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supplier_Engagement_on_Climate_Target_Setting+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Supplier Engagement on Climate Target Setting",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Environmental due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supplier_Engagement_on_Climate_Target_Setting+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575514,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Supplier Engagement in Climate Adaptation Strategy+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supplier_Engagement_in_Climate_Adaptation_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Supplier Engagement in Climate Adaptation Strategy",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Environmental due diligence is the process through which companies identify, prevent, mitigate and remedy their actual and potential adverse environmental impacts.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Supplier_Engagement_in_Climate_Adaptation_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575521,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Affected Stakeholder Engagement on Climate Strategy+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Affected_Stakeholder_Engagement_on_Climate_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Affected Stakeholder Engagement on Climate Strategy",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "A Just Transition approach show that brands are acknowledging the need for equitable decision-making models when making changes to their supply chain procurement in line with climate targets to ensure adequate protections for workers.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Affected_Stakeholder_Engagement_on_Climate_Strategy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575528,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Efforts to Upskill Supply Chain Workers+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Efforts_to_Upskill_Supply_Chain_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Efforts to Upskill Supply Chain Workers",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "A Just Transition approach show that brands are acknowledging the need for equitable decision-making models when making changes to their supply chain procurement in line with climate targets to ensure adequate protections for workers.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Efforts_to_Upskill_Supply_Chain_Workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575535,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Efforts to Compensate Workers Impacted by Climate Crisis+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Efforts_to_Compensate_Workers_Impacted_by_Climate_Crisis+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Efforts to Compensate Workers Impacted by Climate Crisis",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "A Just Transition approach show that brands are acknowledging the need for equitable decision-making models when making changes to their supply chain procurement in line with climate targets to ensure adequate protections for workers.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Efforts_to_Compensate_Workers_Impacted_by_Climate_Crisis+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575542,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Evidence of Renewable Energy Advocacy (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Evidence_of_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Evidence of Renewable Energy Advocacy (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing detailed renewable energy information shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Evidence_of_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575549,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Outcome of Renewable Energy Advocacy (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Outcome_of_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Outcome of Renewable Energy Advocacy (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing detailed renewable energy information shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Outcome_of_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575556,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Commitment on State-Imposed Forced Labour in Supply Chain (Renewable Energy)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Commitment_on_State_Imposed_Forced_Labour_in_Supply_Chain_Renewable_Energy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Commitment on State-Imposed Forced Labour in Supply Chain (Renewable Energy)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Score",
      "about": "State-imposed forced labour is when governments force their citizens to work to for economic development, to punish political dissents, or to discriminate against minorities. When state-imposed forced labour occurs, it becomes impossible for brands to conduct third-party audits or due diligence to verify the absence of forced labour, prevent or mitigate forced labour, or remediate forced labour.",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Just_Transition_Advocacy_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Just_Transition_Advocacy_Score_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Commitment_on_State_Imposed_Forced_Labour_in_Supply_Chain_Renewable_Energy+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575564,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+RE100 Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+RE100_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "RE100 Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a commitment to the RE100?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "Measuring and publishing renewable energy targets shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>2025 Methodology update</strong></p>\r\n<p>We are looking for membership to the RE100 initiative: https://www.there100.org/re100-members and information on the target. </p>\r\n<p>Public commitment to source 100% renewable electricity throughout entire operations, including any scope 1 emissions relating to generation of electricity by the company, all scope 2 emissions relating to company activities and the operations of businesses operating with the brand or company group.</p>\r\n<p>RE100 targets are consumption targets. The goal is to be consuming 100% renewable electricity by a target year. All electricity consumed, coming from both self-generation and purchases from utility/supplier is included in the target. The target boundary can be defined in terms of the organization’s GHG emission boundary (following the GHG Protocol convention). RE100 targets are for the electricity consumption which underlies, according to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol: </p>\r\n<p>• All Scope 2 emissions associated with purchased electricity; and</p>\r\n<p>• All Scope 1 emissions associated with the generation of electricity by the company, for the company’s consumption. </p>\r\n<p>For instance, a Combined Heat and Power plant used to generate electricity for self-consumption is within the scope of the RE100 target. If the electricity produced is sold to the grid or a third party, it does not fall in the scope of the target.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><strong>Previous Methodology</strong><br><br>In this question you are being asked to identify whether the company discloses a commitment to the RE100<br><br>Where to look for this information:<br>- Corporate Social Responsibility report<br>- Company documents<br>- Company policies<br>- Company websites<br>- Company code of conduct<br>- Parent company documents (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company policies (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company websites (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br>- Parent company code of conduct (only if the parent company is linked to from the brands website)<br><br>Good keywords for your searches include:<br>- Renewable<br>- Electricity<br>- RE100<br><br>Things to keep in mind:<br>- Examples of the company's owned and operated facilities include; head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.<br>- The supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+RE100 Commitment+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+RE100_Commitment+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+RE100_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19575616,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+RE100 Commitment+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+RE100_Commitment+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "RE100 Commitment",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Measuring and publishing renewable energy targets shows that a company is working to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce its carbon emissions.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Energy_Procurement_Score.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Energy_Procurement_Score_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+RE100_Commitment+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19576592,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.1 Governance",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_1_Governance.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.1 Governance",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>In this subsection, we examine who in the company is accountable for the brand's climate performance and impacts. We check if brands publish information that links CEO and executive-level pay and incentives to achieving absolute carbon reduction across the entire value chain. We also look at the percentage of executive bonuses or pay tied to these reduction targets.</p>\r\n<p>Additionally, we assess whether suppliers' incentives, such as long-term contracts, increased order sizes, price premiums, and reduced audits, are tied to decarbonisation improvements.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19575303",
          "weight": 33.3333333333333
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575311",
          "weight": 33.3333333333333
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575318",
          "weight": 33.3333333333333
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Accountability_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_1_Governance+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19576598,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.3 Overconsumption & Materials",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Overconsumption_Materials.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.3 Overconsumption & Materials",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Here we assess what brands are doing to increase the use of sustainable materials and address overproduction. We looked specifically at: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Public disclosure on brands' strategies and progress to use more sustainable materials </li>\r\n<li>Public disclosure on brands' overall fibre mix </li>\r\n<li>Public disclosure on how many items were produced in the reporting period </li>\r\n<li>Brands' public commitment to degrowth</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5954852",
          "weight": 33.3333333333333
        },
        {
          "metric": "~15366357",
          "weight": 33.3333333333333
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606360",
          "weight": 16.6666666666667
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5957129",
          "weight": 8.33333333333333
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5956876",
          "weight": 8.33333333333333
        }
      ],
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Accountability_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Overconsumption_Materials+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19576605,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2.1 Decarbonisation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2.1 Decarbonisation",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Examines transparency of brands' emission reduction targets, implementation plans, and progress, including disclosure on specific actions and strategies, timebound targets for renewable energy, coal phase-out, and electrifying energy-intensive processes in garment manufacturing.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606567",
          "weight": 8
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5958394",
          "weight": 8
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606576",
          "weight": 8
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575332",
          "weight": 8
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575325",
          "weight": 8
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575339",
          "weight": 12
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575346",
          "weight": 12
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575353",
          "weight": 12
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575360",
          "weight": 12
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575367",
          "weight": 12
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Decarbonisation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19576611,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2.2 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Footprint",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Greenhouse_Gas_GHG_Footprint.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2.2 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Footprint",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Examines transparency of how brands publicly define their company's scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions, and what they are disclosing about their GHG footprints across the different scopes.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19575374",
          "weight": 21.4285714285714
        },
        {
          "metric": "~13173149",
          "weight": 14.2857142857143
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19576656",
          "weight": 64.2857142857143
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Decarbonisation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Greenhouse_Gas_GHG_Footprint+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19576617,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2.3 Energy Consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Energy_Consumption.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2.3 Energy Consumption",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Examines transparency of how brands define renewable energy, publicly disclose their energy and electricity consumption in their own operations and supply chain level, broken down by country and production process.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19575381",
          "weight": 9.52380952380952
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575388",
          "weight": 9.52380952380952
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575395",
          "weight": 19.047619047619
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575402",
          "weight": 19.047619047619
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575409",
          "weight": 21.4285714285714
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575416",
          "weight": 21.4285714285714
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Decarbonisation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Energy_Consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19576623,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2. Decarbonisation Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Decarbonisation_Score.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2. Decarbonisation Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>In line with the urgency to reduce emissions, this section is the most heavily weighted of the report - worth 40% of brands' overall score.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19576605",
          "weight": 41.6666666666667
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19576611",
          "weight": 23.3333333333333
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19576617",
          "weight": 35
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2024_What_Fuels_Fashion_edition.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Decarbonisation_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19576629,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3. Energy Procurement Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Energy_Procurement_Score.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3. Energy Procurement Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><strong>What are fashion brands revealing about how they buy renewable energy, their use, and how effective and impactful their approaches are?</strong></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">In this section, we try to understand major fashion brands' progress on adopting renewable energy through their commitment to the RE100 initiative - a global corporate pledge to 100% renewable energy.</span></p>\r\n<p>We are also looking to assess the transparency levels and detail of their energy procurement strategies for both owned facilities and supply chains. This includes examining the types of procurement methods used and how robust and credible these approaches are.</p>\r\n<p>Alongside this, we are also evaluating the level of transparency on the scope and scale of renewable energy use and production in the supply chain by looking at the percentage of electricity consumption that is matched to renewable energy both annually and hourly - also known as 24/7 hourly matching.</p>\r\n<p>Finally, we are looking at brands’ future plans for renewable electricity procurement and what specific constructs they are pursuing, alongside what other measures they are seeking to support renewable electricity procurement in their supply chains.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19575616",
          "weight": 4.44444444444444
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575423",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575430",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575437",
          "weight": 15.5555555555556
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575444",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575451",
          "weight": 20
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2024_What_Fuels_Fashion_edition.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Energy_Procurement_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19576635,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4. Financing Decarbonisation Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Financing_Decarbonisation_Score.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4. Financing Decarbonisation Score",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>In this section, we measure transparency of efforts to finance fashion’s decarbonisation from fossil fuels to renewable energy. Firstly, we look for a brand’s efforts to identify and respond to climate-related risks - like floods, droughts and heatwaves - which have financial impacts on their business. When fashion brands identify substantive costs of climate risks on their business operations, they are more likely to act on them. This is why we look for disclosure of climate risks through a financial lens.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19575458",
          "weight": 13.3333333333333
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575465",
          "weight": 13.3333333333333
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575472",
          "weight": 22.2222222222222
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575479",
          "weight": 22.2222222222222
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575486",
          "weight": 8.88888888888889
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575493",
          "weight": 20
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2024_What_Fuels_Fashion_edition.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Financing_Decarbonisation_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19576640,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.1 Just Transition",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.1 Just Transition",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion in Transition Planning",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19575500",
          "weight": 12.1951219512195
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575507",
          "weight": 14.6341463414634
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575514",
          "weight": 14.6341463414634
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575521",
          "weight": 14.6341463414634
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575528",
          "weight": 14.6341463414634
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575535",
          "weight": 14.6341463414634
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5949032",
          "weight": 4.87804878048781
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5948779",
          "weight": 4.87804878048781
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19787496",
          "weight": 4.87804878048781
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Just_Transition_Advocacy_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19576645,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.2 Renewable Energy Advocacy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.2 Renewable Energy Advocacy",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19575542",
          "weight": 46.6666666666667
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575549",
          "weight": 53.3333333333333
        }
      ],
      "answer": 450,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 251,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Just_Transition_Advocacy_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19576651,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5. Just Transition & Advocacy Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Just_Transition_Advocacy_Score.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5. Just Transition & Advocacy Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This section looks at how transparent major fashion brands and retailers are about their efforts to support a clean, fair, and just energy transition from different angles. Firstly, we looked at what business strategies they have publicly outlined that explicitly commit to a Just Transition. Our assessment was shaped by what Climate Action 100+, the World Benchmarking Alliance and the We Mean Business Coalition advocate for when it comes to just transition policy. We also utilised the International Labour Organization’s Just Transition Guidelines.</p>\r\n<p>Secondly, we explored whether big fashion brands are transparent about how they consult and co-create with their suppliers on the setting of their climate targets. We also looked at how they are supporting suppliers to adapt to climate change, sensitive to their local contexts.</p>\r\n<p>Thirdly, we looked at how transparent big brands are when it comes to engaging with workers and local communities impacted by their climate strategies. This looks like public disclosure on how they are co-creating solutions, how they retain and or up-skill workers whose jobs may be at risk and also public disclosure on how they compensate workers who may be impacted by climate hazards.</p>\r\n<p>We also evaluated the extent to which brands publish their commitments to enabling rights like freedom of association and collective bargaining.</p>\r\n<p>Additionally, we sought to understand how major fashion brands might be fuelling change in their supply chains where access to renewable energy through public disclosure of their political advocacy for renewable energy and the outcomes of this advocacy. Finally, we looked at whether or not brands disclose a public commitment to ensure that their suppliers transitioning to renewable energy do not procure solar panels made with high-risk of State-Imposed Forced Labour.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion in Transition Planning",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19576640",
          "weight": 68.3333333333333
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19576645",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575556",
          "weight": 6.66666666666667
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2024_What_Fuels_Fashion_edition.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Just_Transition_Advocacy_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19576656,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Carbon Emissions+Fashion Transparency Index 2024 - Scoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Emissions+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2024_Scoring.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Carbon Emissions",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>Measuring and publishing carbon emissions data shows that a company is working to understand and address its contribution to climate change.</p>\r\n<p>A note on the scoring system</p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 150 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Owned and operated facilities\":\"2.2222222222222222\",\"Supply chain\":\"3.3333333333333333\",\"Raw material level (2021 only)\":\"4.4444444444444444\",\"None\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Greenhouse_Gas_GHG_Footprint.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Carbon_Emissions+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2024_Scoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689660,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses manufacturing facilities (specific location)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_manufacturing_facilities_specific_location.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses manufacturing facilities (specific location)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose manufacturing facilities (specific location)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.</p>\r\n<p>The 2024 and 2025 methodologies has been designed by the Fashion Revolution team with consultative input from a committee of experts including New Climate Institute, Stand.Earth, Action Speaks Louder, Transformers Foundation, Planet Tracker, CDP, InfluenceMap, EnergyTag, Peter Ford and Illishio Lovejoy (Laudes Foundation) among others. This research is funded by the Laudes Foundation, Pooled Fund on International Energy and Tara Climate Foundation.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"background-color: #ffffff;\"><a href=\"https://opensupplyhub.org/\" style=\"text-decoration-line: none; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: #000000; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve; background-color: #ffffff;\">We are looking for a map or list that represents a significant proportion of the suppliers, and not just a few. If brands do not disclose their percentage we will use our own discretion to determine if the list seems exhaustive and appears to represent a significant proportion. If a brand links to the </span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: #1155cc; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve; background-color: #ffffff;\">Open Supply Hub</span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: #000000; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve; background-color: #ffffff;\"> (formerly known as the Open Apparel Registry) and you can find suppliers linked to the brand on the platform, then we will allow points. The OSH houses data from tier one and beyond. By facility, we mean individual factories or manufacturing locations.</span></a></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses manufacturing facilities (specific location)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 459,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_manufacturing_facilities_specific_location+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supplier_Disclosure_combined.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_manufacturing_facilities_specific_location+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689670,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses address of manufacturing facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_address_of_manufacturing_facilities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses address of manufacturing facilities",
      "question": "<p>Does the company disclose address of its manufacturing facilities?</p>",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.</p>\r\n<p>The 2024 and 2025 methodologies has been designed by the Fashion Revolution team with consultative input from a committee of experts including New Climate Institute, Stand.Earth, Action Speaks Louder, Transformers Foundation, Planet Tracker, CDP, InfluenceMap, EnergyTag, Peter Ford and Illishio Lovejoy (Laudes Foundation) among others. This research is funded by the Laudes Foundation, Pooled Fund on International Energy and Tara Climate Foundation.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>If a brand links to OSH and you can find suppliers linked to the brand on the platform, then we will allow points.</p>\r\n<p>What Fuels Fashion' uses The Global Fashion Transparency Index's ratings methodology to benchmark brands' disclosure across five key areas, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisatin and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>We only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:</p>\r\n<p> • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or</p>\r\n<p> • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>The methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance. </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses address of manufacturing facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 459,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_address_of_manufacturing_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supplier_Disclosure_combined.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_address_of_manufacturing_facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689678,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses type of products or services (manufacturing facilities)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_type_of_products_or_services_manufacturing_facilities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses type of products or services (manufacturing facilities)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the type of products and services produced in its manufacturing facilities? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.</p>\r\n<p>The 2024 and 2025 methodologies has been designed by the Fashion Revolution team with consultative input from a committee of experts including New Climate Institute, Stand.Earth, Action Speaks Louder, Transformers Foundation, Planet Tracker, CDP, InfluenceMap, EnergyTag, Peter Ford and Illishio Lovejoy (Laudes Foundation) among others. This research is funded by the Laudes Foundation, Pooled Fund on International Energy and Tara Climate Foundation.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Best practice is a detailed breakdown of products or services - beyond just 'Apparel' </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>What Fuels Fashion' uses The Global Fashion Transparency Index's ratings methodology to benchmark brands' disclosure across five key areas, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisatin and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p> We only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:</p>\r\n<p> • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or</p>\r\n<p> • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>The methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance. </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses type of products or services (manufacturing facilities)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 459,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_type_of_products_or_services_manufacturing_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supplier_Disclosure_combined.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_type_of_products_or_services_manufacturing_facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689687,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publicly available list of manufacturing facilities in open data format",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publicly_available_list_of_manufacturing_facilities_in_open_data_format.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publicly available list of manufacturing facilities in open data format",
      "question": "Does the company make the list of its manufacturing facilities publicly available in an open data format (aligning with the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector) in order to make this information easy to use for trade unions and NGOs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.</p>\r\n<p>The 2024 and 2025 methodologies has been designed by the Fashion Revolution team with consultative input from a committee of experts including New Climate Institute, Stand.Earth, Action Speaks Louder, Transformers Foundation, Planet Tracker, CDP, InfluenceMap, EnergyTag, Peter Ford and Illishio Lovejoy (Laudes Foundation) among others. This research is funded by the Laudes Foundation, Pooled Fund on International Energy and Tara Climate Foundation.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Online maps and PDF documents do not count as not machine readable. Looking specifically for Excel, csv or json documents.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>What Fuels Fashion' uses The Global Fashion Transparency Index's ratings methodology to benchmark brands' disclosure across five key areas, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisatin and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>We only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:</p>\r\n<p> • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or</p>\r\n<p> • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.</p>\r\n<p>The methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Publicly available list of manufacturing facilities in open data format+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 459,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publicly_available_list_of_manufacturing_facilities_in_open_data_format+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Open_Format_for_Supply_Chain_Disclosure_Combined.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Transparency_Beyond_Basic_Pledge_Standard_Combined.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publicly_available_list_of_manufacturing_facilities_in_open_data_format+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689696,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+List of Manufacturing facilities contributed to Open Supply Hub",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+List_of_Manufacturing_facilities_contributed_to_Open_Supply_Hub.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "List of Manufacturing facilities contributed to Open Supply Hub",
      "question": "Does the company contribute the list of its manufacturing facilities to the Open Supply Hub, in order to enable collaboration, as well as easy and efficient access for trade unions & NGOs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.</p>\r\n<p>The 2024 and 2025 methodologies has been designed by the Fashion Revolution team with consultative input from a committee of experts including New Climate Institute, Stand.Earth, Action Speaks Louder, Transformers Foundation, Planet Tracker, CDP, InfluenceMap, EnergyTag, Peter Ford and Illishio Lovejoy (Laudes Foundation) among others. This research is funded by the Laudes Foundation, Pooled Fund on International Energy and Tara Climate Foundation.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Where a Contributor name includes [Public List] at the end, this means that the data has been accessed, formatted and contributed to the Open Supply Hub by their team. It is not actively managed and updated by the brand itself. In that case, the brand does not get the point.<br><br></p>\r\n<p>What Fuels Fashion' uses The Global Fashion Transparency Index's ratings methodology to benchmark brands' disclosure across five key areas, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisatin and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>We only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:</p>\r\n<p> • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or</p>\r\n<p> • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.</p>\r\n<p>The methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+List of Manufacturing facilities contributed to Open Supply Hub+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 459,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+List_of_Manufacturing_facilities_contributed_to_Open_Supply_Hub+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+List_of_Manufacturing_facilities_contributed_to_Open_Supply_Hub+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689705,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses processing facilities (specific location)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_processing_facilities_specific_location.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses processing facilities (specific location)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose processing facilities (specific location)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.</p>\r\n<p>The 2024 and 2025 methodologies has been designed by the Fashion Revolution team with consultative input from a committee of experts including New Climate Institute, Stand.Earth, Action Speaks Louder, Transformers Foundation, Planet Tracker, CDP, InfluenceMap, EnergyTag, Peter Ford and Illishio Lovejoy (Laudes Foundation) among others. This research is funded by the Laudes Foundation, Pooled Fund on International Energy and Tara Climate Foundation.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;\">We are looking for a map or list that represents a significant proportion of the suppliers. Disclosing one or two suppliers is not sufficient unless it specifies that these suppliers supply a significant chunk of the company's overall product volume. By facility, we mean individual factories or processing locations.If brands do not disclose their percentage we will use our own discretion to determine if the list seems exhaustive and appears to represent a significant proportion.<br><br></span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">What Fuels Fashion' uses The Global Fashion Transparency Index's ratings methodology to benchmark brands' disclosure across five key areas, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisatin and Just Transition and Advocacy. </span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">We only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">The methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance. </span></span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses processing facilities (specific location)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_processing_facilities_specific_location+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_processing_facilities_specific_location+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689749,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses address of processing facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_address_of_processing_facilities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses address of processing facilities",
      "question": "Does the company disclose address of its processing facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses address of processing facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_address_of_processing_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_address_of_processing_facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689758,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses type of products or services (processing facilities)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_type_of_products_or_services_processing_facilities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses type of products or services (processing facilities)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the type of products and services produced in its processing facilities? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.</p>\r\n<p>The 2024 and 2025 methodologies has been designed by the Fashion Revolution team with consultative input from a committee of experts including New Climate Institute, Stand.Earth, Action Speaks Louder, Transformers Foundation, Planet Tracker, CDP, InfluenceMap, EnergyTag, Peter Ford and Illishio Lovejoy (Laudes Foundation) among others. This research is funded by the Laudes Foundation, Pooled Fund on International Energy and Tara Climate Foundation.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;\">Best practice is a detailed breakdown of products or services - beyond just 'Apparel'</span></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">What Fuels Fashion' uses The Global Fashion Transparency Index's ratings methodology to benchmark brands' disclosure across five key areas, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisatin and Just Transition and Advocacy. </span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">We only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">The methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance. </span></span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses type of products or services (processing facilities)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_type_of_products_or_services_processing_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_type_of_products_or_services_processing_facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689767,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publicly available list of processing facilities in open data format",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publicly_available_list_of_processing_facilities_in_open_data_format.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publicly available list of processing facilities in open data format",
      "question": "Does the company make the list of its processing facilities publicly available in an open data format (aligning with the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector) in order to make this information easy to use for trade unions and NGOs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>'What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.</p>\r\n<p>The 2024 and 2025 methodologies has been designed by the Fashion Revolution team with consultative input from a committee of experts including New Climate Institute, Stand.Earth, Action Speaks Louder, Transformers Foundation, Planet Tracker, CDP, InfluenceMap, EnergyTag, Peter Ford and Illishio Lovejoy (Laudes Foundation) among others. This research is funded by the Laudes Foundation, Pooled Fund on International Energy and Tara Climate Foundation.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Online maps and PDF documents do not count as not machine readable. Looking specifically for Excel, csv or json documents.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>What Fuels Fashion' uses The Global Fashion Transparency Index's ratings methodology to benchmark brands' disclosure across five key areas, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisatin and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>We only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:</p>\r\n<p> • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or</p>\r\n<p> • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.</p>\r\n<p>The methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Publicly available list of processing facilities in open data format+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publicly_available_list_of_processing_facilities_in_open_data_format+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publicly_available_list_of_processing_facilities_in_open_data_format+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689776,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+List of Processing facilities contributed to Open Supply Hub",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+List_of_Processing_facilities_contributed_to_Open_Supply_Hub.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "List of Processing facilities contributed to Open Supply Hub",
      "question": "Does the company contribute the list of its processing facilities to the Open Supply Hub, in order to enable collaboration, as well as easy and efficient access for trade unions & NGOs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.</p>\r\n<p>The 2024 and 2025 methodologies has been designed by the Fashion Revolution team with consultative input from a committee of experts including New Climate Institute, Stand.Earth, Action Speaks Louder, Transformers Foundation, Planet Tracker, CDP, InfluenceMap, EnergyTag, Peter Ford and Illishio Lovejoy (Laudes Foundation) among others. This research is funded by the Laudes Foundation, Pooled Fund on International Energy and Tara Climate Foundation.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Where a Contributor name includes [Public List] at the end, this means that the data has been accessed, formatted and contributed to the Open Supply Hub (OSH) by the OSH Team. It is not actively managed and updated by the brand itself. In that case, the brand does not get the point</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>What Fuels Fashion' uses The Global Fashion Transparency Index's ratings methodology to benchmark brands' disclosure across five key areas, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisatin and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>We only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:</p>\r\n<p> • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or</p>\r\n<p> • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.</p>\r\n<p>The methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+List of Processing facilities contributed to Open Supply Hub+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+List_of_Processing_facilities_contributed_to_Open_Supply_Hub+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+List_of_Processing_facilities_contributed_to_Open_Supply_Hub+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689785,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses name of parent company for each manufacturing facility",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_name_of_parent_company_for_each_manufacturing_facility.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses name of parent company for each manufacturing facility",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the name of the parent company for each of its manufacturing facilities (if applicable)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.</p>\r\n<p>The 2024 and 2025 methodologies has been designed by the Fashion Revolution team with consultative input from a committee of experts including New Climate Institute, Stand.Earth, Action Speaks Louder, Transformers Foundation, Planet Tracker, CDP, InfluenceMap, EnergyTag, Peter Ford and Illishio Lovejoy (Laudes Foundation) among others. This research is funded by the Laudes Foundation, Pooled Fund on International Energy and Tara Climate Foundation.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">A parent company is a holding group that has majority ownership or control over a factory or supplier facility. If a facility does not have a parent company and that is indicated in the list, then points are allowed. </span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">We do not accept disclosure on a group agent for this indicator. Group Agents work as mediators between apparel buyers (retailers) and garment manufacturers. Therefore, the parent company information is more important as this expresses ownership.<br><br></span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">\"What Fuels Fashion' uses The Global Fashion Transparency Index's ratings methodology to benchmark brands' disclosure across five key areas, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisatin and Just Transition and Advocacy. </span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> </span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">We only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> </span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">The methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance. </span></span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses name of parent company for each manufacturing facility+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 459,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_name_of_parent_company_for_each_manufacturing_facility+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supplier_Disclosure_combined.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_name_of_parent_company_for_each_manufacturing_facility+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689794,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses name of parent company for each processing facility",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_name_of_parent_company_for_each_processing_facility.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses name of parent company for each processing facility",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the name of the parent company for each of its processing facilities (if applicable)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.</p>\r\n<p>The 2024 and 2025 methodologies has been designed by the Fashion Revolution team with consultative input from a committee of experts including New Climate Institute, Stand.Earth, Action Speaks Louder, Transformers Foundation, Planet Tracker, CDP, InfluenceMap, EnergyTag, Peter Ford and Illishio Lovejoy (Laudes Foundation) among others. This research is funded by the Laudes Foundation, Pooled Fund on International Energy and Tara Climate Foundation.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>A parent company is a company that has majority ownership or control over a factory or supplier facility</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>What Fuels Fashion' uses The Global Fashion Transparency Index's ratings methodology to benchmark brands' disclosure across five key areas, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisatin and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>We only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:</p>\r\n<p> • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or</p>\r\n<p> • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.</p>\r\n<p>The methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses name of parent company for each processing facility+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_name_of_parent_company_for_each_processing_facility+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_name_of_parent_company_for_each_processing_facility+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689803,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses raw material facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_raw_material_facilities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses raw material facilities",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its raw material facilities (specific location)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses raw material facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_raw_material_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_raw_material_facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689812,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses name of parent company of each raw material facility",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_name_of_parent_company_of_each_raw_material_facility.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses name of parent company of each raw material facility",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the name of the parent company for each of its raw material facilities (if applicable)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.</p>\r\n<p>The 2024 and 2025 methodologies has been designed by the Fashion Revolution team with consultative input from a committee of experts including New Climate Institute, Stand.Earth, Action Speaks Louder, Transformers Foundation, Planet Tracker, CDP, InfluenceMap, EnergyTag, Peter Ford and Illishio Lovejoy (Laudes Foundation) among others. This research is funded by the Laudes Foundation, Pooled Fund on International Energy and Tara Climate Foundation.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>We are looking for a list or map that represents a significant proportion of suppliers. Disclosing one or two suppliers is not sufficient unless it specifies that these suppliers supply a significant chunk of the company's overall volume. However, will accept if list covers only one or two types of fibre such as viscose, wool, cotton, etc.<br><br><br></p>\r\n<p>What Fuels Fashion' uses The Global Fashion Transparency Index's ratings methodology to benchmark brands' disclosure across five key areas, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisatin and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>We only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:</p>\r\n<p> • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or</p>\r\n<p> • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.</p>\r\n<p>The methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses name of parent company of each raw material facility+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_name_of_parent_company_of_each_raw_material_facility+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_name_of_parent_company_of_each_raw_material_facility+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689821,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses address of raw material facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_address_of_raw_material_facilities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses address of raw material facilities",
      "question": "Does the company disclose address of its raw material facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses address of raw material facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_address_of_raw_material_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_address_of_raw_material_facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689837,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses the specific raw material fiber, products or services (raw material facilities)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_the_specific_raw_material_fiber_products_or_services_raw_material_facilities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses the specific raw material fiber, products or services (raw material facilities)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the specific raw materials, fibers, products, and services produced by its raw material facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.</p>\r\n<p>The 2024 and 2025 methodologies has been designed by the Fashion Revolution team with consultative input from a committee of experts including New Climate Institute, Stand.Earth, Action Speaks Louder, Transformers Foundation, Planet Tracker, CDP, InfluenceMap, EnergyTag, Peter Ford and Illishio Lovejoy (Laudes Foundation) among others. This research is funded by the Laudes Foundation, Pooled Fund on International Energy and Tara Climate Foundation.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;\">For instance, viscose or synthetics<br><br><br></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">What Fuels Fashion' uses The Global Fashion Transparency Index's ratings methodology to benchmark brands' disclosure across five key areas, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisatin and Just Transition and Advocacy. </span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">We only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.</span></span></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">The methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance. </span></span></p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses the specific raw material fiber, products or services (raw material facilities)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_the_specific_raw_material_fiber_products_or_services_raw_material_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_the_specific_raw_material_fiber_products_or_services_raw_material_facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689846,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publicly available list of raw material facilities in open data format",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publicly_available_list_of_raw_material_facilities_in_open_data_format.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publicly available list of raw material facilities in open data format",
      "question": "Does the company make the list of its raw material facilities publicly available in an open data format (aligning with the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector) in order to make this information easy to use for trade unions and NGOs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.</p>\r\n<p>The 2024 and 2025 methodologies has been designed by the Fashion Revolution team with consultative input from a committee of experts including New Climate Institute, Stand.Earth, Action Speaks Louder, Transformers Foundation, Planet Tracker, CDP, InfluenceMap, EnergyTag, Peter Ford and Illishio Lovejoy (Laudes Foundation) among others. This research is funded by the Laudes Foundation, Pooled Fund on International Energy and Tara Climate Foundation.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Online maps and PDF documents do not count as not machine readable. Looking specifically for Excel, csv or json documents.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>What Fuels Fashion' uses The Global Fashion Transparency Index's ratings methodology to benchmark brands' disclosure across five key areas, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisatin and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>We only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:</p>\r\n<p> • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or</p>\r\n<p> • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.</p>\r\n<p>The methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Publicly available list of raw material facilities in open data format+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publicly_available_list_of_raw_material_facilities_in_open_data_format+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publicly_available_list_of_raw_material_facilities_in_open_data_format+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689855,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+List of raw material facilities contributed to Open Supply Hub",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+List_of_raw_material_facilities_contributed_to_Open_Supply_Hub.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "List of raw material facilities contributed to Open Supply Hub",
      "question": "Does the company contribute the list of its raw material facilities to the Open Supply Hub, in order to enable collaboration, as well as easy and efficient access for trade unions & NGOs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.</p>\r\n<p>The 2024 and 2025 methodologies has been designed by the Fashion Revolution team with consultative input from a committee of experts including New Climate Institute, Stand.Earth, Action Speaks Louder, Transformers Foundation, Planet Tracker, CDP, InfluenceMap, EnergyTag, Peter Ford and Illishio Lovejoy (Laudes Foundation) among others. This research is funded by the Laudes Foundation, Pooled Fund on International Energy and Tara Climate Foundation.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Where a Contributor name includes [Public List] at the end, this means that the data has been accessed, formatted and contributed to the Open Supply Hub (OSH)  by the OSH Team. It is not actively managed and updated by the brand itself. In that case, the brand does not get the point.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>What Fuels Fashion' uses The Global Fashion Transparency Index's ratings methodology to benchmark brands' disclosure across five key areas, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisatin and Just Transition and Advocacy. </p>\r\n<p>We only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:</p>\r\n<p> • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;</p>\r\n<p> • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or</p>\r\n<p> • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.</p>\r\n<p>The methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+List of raw material facilities contributed to Open Supply Hub+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+List_of_raw_material_facilities_contributed_to_Open_Supply_Hub+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+List_of_raw_material_facilities_contributed_to_Open_Supply_Hub+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689863,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses manufacturing facilities (specific location)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_manufacturing_facilities_specific_location+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses manufacturing facilities (specific location)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 459,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_manufacturing_facilities_specific_location+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689868,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses name of parent company for each manufacturing facility+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_name_of_parent_company_for_each_manufacturing_facility+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses name of parent company for each manufacturing facility",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 459,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_name_of_parent_company_for_each_manufacturing_facility+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689872,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses address of manufacturing facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_address_of_manufacturing_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses address of manufacturing facilities",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 459,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_address_of_manufacturing_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689876,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses type of products or services (manufacturing facilities)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_type_of_products_or_services_manufacturing_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses type of products or services (manufacturing facilities)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 459,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_type_of_products_or_services_manufacturing_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689880,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publicly available list of manufacturing facilities in open data format+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publicly_available_list_of_manufacturing_facilities_in_open_data_format+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publicly available list of manufacturing facilities in open data format",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 459,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publicly_available_list_of_manufacturing_facilities_in_open_data_format+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689884,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+List of Manufacturing facilities contributed to Open Supply Hub+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+List_of_Manufacturing_facilities_contributed_to_Open_Supply_Hub+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "List of Manufacturing facilities contributed to Open Supply Hub",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 459,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+List_of_Manufacturing_facilities_contributed_to_Open_Supply_Hub+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689888,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses processing facilities (specific location)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_processing_facilities_specific_location+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses processing facilities (specific location)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_processing_facilities_specific_location+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689892,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses name of parent company for each processing facility+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_name_of_parent_company_for_each_processing_facility+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses name of parent company for each processing facility",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_name_of_parent_company_for_each_processing_facility+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689896,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses address of processing facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_address_of_processing_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses address of processing facilities",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_address_of_processing_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689900,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses type of products or services (processing facilities)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_type_of_products_or_services_processing_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses type of products or services (processing facilities)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_type_of_products_or_services_processing_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689904,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publicly available list of processing facilities in open data format+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publicly_available_list_of_processing_facilities_in_open_data_format+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publicly available list of processing facilities in open data format",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publicly_available_list_of_processing_facilities_in_open_data_format+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689908,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+List of Processing facilities contributed to Open Supply Hub+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+List_of_Processing_facilities_contributed_to_Open_Supply_Hub+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "List of Processing facilities contributed to Open Supply Hub",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+List_of_Processing_facilities_contributed_to_Open_Supply_Hub+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689912,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses raw material facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_raw_material_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses raw material facilities",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_raw_material_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689916,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses name of parent company of each raw material facility+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_name_of_parent_company_of_each_raw_material_facility+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses name of parent company of each raw material facility",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_name_of_parent_company_of_each_raw_material_facility+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689920,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses address of raw material facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_address_of_raw_material_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses address of raw material facilities",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_address_of_raw_material_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689924,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses the specific raw material fiber, products or services (raw material facilities)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_the_specific_raw_material_fiber_products_or_services_raw_material_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses the specific raw material fiber, products or services (raw material facilities)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_the_specific_raw_material_fiber_products_or_services_raw_material_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689928,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Publicly available list of raw material facilities in open data format+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publicly_available_list_of_raw_material_facilities_in_open_data_format+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Publicly available list of raw material facilities in open data format",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Publicly_available_list_of_raw_material_facilities_in_open_data_format+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689932,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+List of raw material facilities contributed to Open Supply Hub+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+List_of_raw_material_facilities_contributed_to_Open_Supply_Hub+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "List of raw material facilities contributed to Open Supply Hub",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+List_of_raw_material_facilities_contributed_to_Open_Supply_Hub+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689937,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.2 Traceability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.2 Traceability",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This subsection focuses on whether brands are publishing supplier lists, focusing on the level of detail provided at three different levels: </p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>The factories where clothes are made are often referred to as the first-tier or tier 1 manufacturers — in other words, the facilities with which brands have a direct relationship and typically do the cutting, sewing and final trims of products; </li>\r\n<li>The processing facilities further down the supply chain — knitting, weaving and spinning mills, wet processing, embroidery, printing and finishing, dyehouses, tanneries and laundries; </li>\r\n<li>The suppliers of raw materials — primary materials such as fibres, hides, rubbers, chemicals and metals.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p>In this research, the methodology is more concise to focus on decarbonisation. Some indicators typically reviewed in the traceability section of the Global Fashion Transparency Index have been removed.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19689863",
          "weight": 4.444444444444444
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689868",
          "weight": 4.444444444444444
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689872",
          "weight": 4.444444444444444
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689876",
          "weight": 4.444444444444444
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689880",
          "weight": 4.444444444444444
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689884",
          "weight": 2.222222222222222
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689888",
          "weight": 8.88888888888889
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689892",
          "weight": 8.88888888888889
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689896",
          "weight": 8.88888888888889
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689900",
          "weight": 4.444444444444444
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689904",
          "weight": 4.444444444444444
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689908",
          "weight": 2.222222222222222
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689912",
          "weight": 8.88888888888889
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689916",
          "weight": 8.88888888888889
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689920",
          "weight": 8.88888888888889
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689924",
          "weight": 4.444444444444444
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689928",
          "weight": 4.444444444444444
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689932",
          "weight": 2.222222222222222
        }
      ],
      "answer": 454,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Accountability_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689943,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1. Accountability Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Accountability_Score.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1. Accountability Score",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This section covers three different areas. </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19576592",
          "weight": 5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689937",
          "weight": 75
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19576598",
          "weight": 20
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2024_What_Fuels_Fashion_edition.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Accountability_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19689949,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Fashion Transparency Index 2024 (What Fuels Fashion edition)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2024_What_Fuels_Fashion_edition.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Fashion Transparency Index 2024 (What Fuels Fashion edition)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index 2024 (What Fuels Fashion edition)?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p>The Fashion Transparency Index 2024 is a special edition reviews and <em><strong><span style=\"text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\">ranks </span>250 of the world's largest fashion brands</strong></em> on <strong><em>disclosure of their climate and energy-related policies</em></strong>, practices and impacts in their own operations and supply chains.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p>This year for the fifth time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate's open data platform. Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>\r\n<p>The Fashion Transparency Index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). It is not a Free Culture Licence. Please see the link for more information: <a href=\"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/\" target=\"_blank\">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</a></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion in Transition Planning",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19689943",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19576623",
          "weight": 40
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19576629",
          "weight": 15
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19576635",
          "weight": 15
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19576651",
          "weight": 20
        }
      ],
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 3,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Test_Network_Aware_Metric.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2024_What_Fuels_Fashion_edition+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19787487,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Commitment to Freedom of Association, Right to Organize and Collective Bargaining in the Supply Chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Commitment_to_Freedom_of_Association_Right_to_Organize_and_Collective_Bargaining_in_the_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Commitment to Freedom of Association, Right to Organize and Collective Bargaining in the Supply Chain",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its commitment to Freedom of Association, Right to Organize, and Collective Bargaining in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>In this question, you are looking for supply chain policies only. Freedom of association is an enabling right. Engaging with workers and their representatives is critical in achieving a Just Transition. Brands have a responsibility to respect workers' freedom of association and their right to collectively bargain on working conditions, including how their jobs will be affected by climate strategies. </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Commitment to Freedom of Association, Right to Organize and Collective Bargaining in the Supply Chain+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Commitment_to_Freedom_of_Association_Right_to_Organize_and_Collective_Bargaining_in_the_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Commitment_to_Freedom_of_Association_Right_to_Organize_and_Collective_Bargaining_in_the_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19787496,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Commitment to Freedom of Association, Right to Organize and Collective Bargaining in the Supply Chain+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Commitment_to_Freedom_of_Association_Right_to_Organize_and_Collective_Bargaining_in_the_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Commitment to Freedom of Association, Right to Organize and Collective Bargaining in the Supply Chain",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px; font-weight: 400;\">Freedom of association is an enabling right. Engaging with workers and their representatives is critical in achieving a Just Transition. Brands have a responsibility to respect workers' freedom of association and their right to collectively bargain on working conditions, including how their jobs will be affected by climate strategies. </span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 15.2px;\">Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 250,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 250,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Commitment_to_Freedom_of_Association_Right_to_Organize_and_Collective_Bargaining_in_the_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19822841,
      "name": "GreenDex+Annual Revenue",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Annual_Revenue.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Annual Revenue",
      "question": "What is the company's annual revenue?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~3341320"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~14312111"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~1884089"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 41055,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6497,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Company_size.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Annual_Revenue+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19822855,
      "name": "GreenDex+Scope 1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Scope_1_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Scope 1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions",
      "question": "What are the company's Scope 1 (direct) Greenhouse Gas Emissions, in terms of metric tonnes of CO2 equivalence?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "metric tonnes CO2 eq.",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~826615"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~170546"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18046378"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~21473238"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 9834,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2250,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Scope_1_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19822867,
      "name": "GreenDex+Company size",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Company_size.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Company size",
      "question": "What is the size of the company (based on a factor of their employee count and revenue)?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Small",
        "Medium",
        "Large"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var mediumEmployees, mediumRevenue, size, smallEmployees, smallRevenue;\n\n  size = annualRevenue * employees;\n\n  smallEmployees = 50;\n\n  smallRevenue = 35000000;\n\n  mediumEmployees = 1000;\n\n  mediumRevenue = 1000000000;\n\n  if (employees < smallEmployees && annualRevenue < smallRevenue) {\n    'Small';\n  } else if (employees < mediumEmployees && annualRevenue < mediumRevenue) {\n    'Medium';\n  } else {\n    'Large';\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19822841",
          "name": "annualRevenue"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19824931",
          "name": "employees"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 157988,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 49065,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Company_size+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19822878,
      "name": "GreenDex+Scope 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Scope_2_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Scope 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions",
      "question": "What are the company's Scope 2 (indirect) Greenhouse Gas Emissions, in terms of metric tonnes of CO2 equivalence?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "metric tonnes CO2 eq.",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~826629"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~169665"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18046402"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 9510,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2198,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Scope_2_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19822888,
      "name": "GreenDex+Energy Consumption",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Energy_Consumption.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Energy Consumption",
      "question": "What is the company's total annual energy consumption (in Gigajoules)?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "gigajoules",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fuel Consumption",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~846580"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18046419"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 8216,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1891,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Energy_Consumption+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19822898,
      "name": "GreenDex+Water Use",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Water_Use.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Water Use",
      "question": "How much water does the company use annually, in cubic meters?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "cubic meters",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Conservation",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Risk & Scarcity Exposure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~801164"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~2554759"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3011,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1159,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Water_Use+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19824931,
      "name": "GreenDex+Number of employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Number_of_employees.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Number of employees",
      "question": "How many employees does the company have?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var answers, isNumber, mapAnswer, mappedAnswers, mapper;\n\n  answers = [e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6, e7];\n\n  mapper = {\n    'Less than 250': 0,\n    '250 to 499': 250,\n    '500 to 999': 500,\n    '1000 to 4999': 1000,\n    '5000 to 19,999': 5000,\n    '20,000 or more': 20000,\n    'Not Provided': 0,\n    '0': 0,\n    '1-9': 1,\n    '10-49': 10,\n    '50-249': 50,\n    '250-999': 250,\n    '250+': 250,\n    '1000+': 1000,\n    'Less than 1000': 0,\n    '1001-5000': 1001,\n    '5001-10000': 5001,\n    'More than 10000': 10000\n  };\n\n  isNumber = function(n) {\n    return !isNaN(parseFloat(n)) && isFinite(n);\n  };\n\n  mapAnswer = function(answer) {\n    if (answer in mapper) {\n      return mapper[answer];\n    }\n    if (isNumber(answer)) {\n      return answer;\n    }\n    return 0;\n  };\n\n  mappedAnswers = answers.map(function(answer) {\n    return mapAnswer(answer);\n  });\n\n  mappedAnswers.reduce(function(a, b) {\n    return Math.max(a, b);\n  });\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~836097",
          "name": "e1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~3341341",
          "name": "e2"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~8674786",
          "name": "e5"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~4780588",
          "name": "e3"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~14544581",
          "name": "e7"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~13876554",
          "name": "e6"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~14312125",
          "name": "e4"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 124542,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 45194,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Company_size.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Number_of_employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19830493,
      "name": "GreenDex+Country",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Country.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Country",
      "question": "What country is the company primarily located in?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var answer;\n\n  answer = \"Unknown\";\n\n  if (isKnown(c1)) {\n    answer = c1;\n  }\n\n  if (isKnown(c2)) {\n    answer = c2;\n  }\n\n  answer;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~3641501",
          "name": "c1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~5456201",
          "name": "c2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 141343,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 138928,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Country+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19856210,
      "name": "GreenDex+Mean Gender Pay Gap (Bonus Pay)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Mean_Gender_Pay_Gap_Bonus_Pay.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Mean Gender Pay Gap (Bonus Pay)",
      "question": "What is the average gender pay gap present within the company's bonus pay? \r\nNegative values represent female pay being greater than male pay on average.",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8674646"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23242380"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 52149,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10567,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Mean_Gender_Pay_Gap_Bonus_Pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19856220,
      "name": "GreenDex+Median Gender Pay Gap (Bonus Pay)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Median_Gender_Pay_Gap_Bonus_Pay.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Median Gender Pay Gap (Bonus Pay)",
      "question": "What is the median gender pay gap present within the company's bonus pay? \r\nNegative values represent the median female pay being greater than the median male pay.",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8674661"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 52137,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10556,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Median_Gender_Pay_Gap_Bonus_Pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19856230,
      "name": "GreenDex+Mean Gender Pay Gap (Hourly Pay)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Mean_Gender_Pay_Gap_Hourly_Pay.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Mean Gender Pay Gap (Hourly Pay)",
      "question": "What is the average gender pay gap present within the company's hourly pay? \r\nNegative values represent female pay being greater than male pay on average.",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~3453141"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22339341"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 63354,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 11109,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Mean_Gender_Pay_Gap_Hourly_Pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19856240,
      "name": "GreenDex+Median Gender Pay Gap (Hourly Pay)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Median_Gender_Pay_Gap_Hourly_Pay.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Median Gender Pay Gap (Hourly Pay)",
      "question": "What is the median gender pay gap present within the company's hourly pay? \r\nNegative values represent the median female pay being greater than the median male pay.",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8674635"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 63119,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Median_Gender_Pay_Gap_Hourly_Pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19856250,
      "name": "GreenDex+Modern Slavery Statement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Modern_Slavery_Statement.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "question": "Has the company produced a statement in relation to any Modern Slavery legislation or Act?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var answers, mapAnswer, mappedAnswers, mapper;\n\n  answers = [a1, a2];\n\n  mapper = {\n    'Yes': 'Yes',\n    'No': 'No',\n    'Yes - UK Modern Slavery Act': 'Yes',\n    'Yes - California Transparency in Supply Chains Act': 'Yes',\n    'Yes - Australian Modern Slavery Act': 'Yes',\n    'Yes - Norwegian Transparency Act': 'Yes',\n    'Yes - Canadian Act': 'Yes',\n    'No - neither': 'No'\n  };\n\n  mapAnswer = function(answer) {\n    var category, i, len;\n    if (answer in mapper) {\n      return mapper[answer];\n    }\n    if (Array.isArray(answer)) {\n      for (i = 0, len = answer.length; i < len; i++) {\n        category = answer[i];\n        if (category in mapper) {\n          return mapper[category];\n        }\n      }\n    }\n    return \"Unknown\";\n  };\n\n  mappedAnswers = answers.map(function(answer) {\n    return mapAnswer(answer);\n  });\n\n  mappedAnswers[0];\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~12552057",
          "name": "a1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~1827651",
          "name": "a2"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 73496,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 27615,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Modern_Slavery_Statement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19856263,
      "name": "GreenDex+Number of Female Employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Number_of_Female_Employees.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Number of Female Employees",
      "question": "How many female people does the company employ?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "female employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~12280187"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~837241"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 16883,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 11524,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Percentage_of_Female_Employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Number_of_Female_Employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19856274,
      "name": "GreenDex+Number of Male Employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Number_of_Male_Employees.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Number of Male Employees",
      "question": "How many male people does the company employ?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "male employees",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~12280848"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~837254"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 15651,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10859,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Percentage_of_Female_Employees.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Number_of_Male_Employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19856286,
      "name": "GreenDex+Percentage of Female Employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Percentage_of_Female_Employees.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Percentage of Female Employees",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's employees are female?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var answer;\n\n  answer = \"Unknown\";\n\n  if (!(isKnown(answer)) && isKnown(p1)) {\n    answer = p1;\n  }\n\n  if (!(isKnown(answer)) && isKnown(p2)) {\n    answer = p2;\n  }\n\n  if (!(isKnown(answer)) && isKnown(p3)) {\n    answer = 100 - p3;\n  }\n\n  if (!(isKnown(answer))) {\n    if ((isKnown(female)) && (isKnown(male))) {\n      answer = 100 * (female / (female + male));\n    } else {\n      answer = \"Unknown\";\n    }\n  }\n\n  answer;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19856263",
          "name": "female"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~19856274",
          "name": "male"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~2933755",
          "name": "p1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~3233894",
          "name": "p2"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~3233883",
          "name": "p3"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 43683,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 25891,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Percentage_of_Female_Employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19856300,
      "name": "GreenDex+Women on Board",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Women_on_Board.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Women on Board",
      "question": "What percentage of the company's board of directors are women?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Board Composition & Independence"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~538693"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5358814"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~12631591"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 4826,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 2703,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Women_on_Board+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19856313,
      "name": "GreenDex+Employee Deaths",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Employee_Deaths.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Employee Deaths",
      "question": "During this reporting period, how many workers died because of a work-related incident?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "deaths",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workplace Accidents",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health Risk Assessments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~16098060"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~815203"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3730,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1536,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Employee_Deaths+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19856324,
      "name": "GreenDex+Reported Incidents of Discrimination",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Reported_Incidents_of_Discrimination.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Reported Incidents of Discrimination",
      "question": "During this reporting period, how many incidents of discrimination were reported?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "incidents",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Anti-Discrimination Measures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Ethnic & Racial Equity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~836314"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~16097945"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3650,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1473,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Reported_Incidents_of_Discrimination+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19874533,
      "name": "GreenDex+Penalties Accrued for Violations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Penalties_Accrued_for_Violations.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Penalties Accrued for Violations",
      "question": "In total, how much money has the company been penalized for violations imposed by US federal regulatory agencies and the Justice Department?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  p1.reduce((function(_this) {\n    return function(partialSum, num) {\n      return partialSum + num;\n    };\n  })(this));\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "year": "all",
          "metric": "~2242741",
          "name": "p1"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 691,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 691,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Penalties_Accrued_for_Violations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19876969,
      "name": "Walk Free+Preventive Measures (mHRDD pilot)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Preventive_Measures_mHRDD_pilot.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Preventive Measures (mHRDD pilot)",
      "question": "Does the company describe preventive measures implemented in response to identified risks related to modern slavery?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Preventive actions are key to addressing the known and widespread risks of modern slavery. This metric is designed to capture the type of preventive measures that companies report putting in place in their statements under different jurisdictions. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">This metric is used to assess Duty of Vigilance statements, German Supply Chain Acts reports, and Norwegian Transparency Act reports.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Preventive actions are implemented in response to risks and to prevent violations from occurring. By contrast, remediation is a response to identified incidents. </p>\r\n<p>Select the following options if: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Training for employees</strong>: training on modern slavery prevention is provided to the company's employees (people hired and paid directly by the company). </li>\r\n<li><strong>Training for suppliers</strong>: suppliers are offered training on modern slavery prevention. This might include human rights training or training on the code of conduct, as long as it entails a modern slavery component. </li>\r\n<li><strong>Recruitment processes</strong>: any measures taken during recruitment, such as translating contracts into workers' languages or imposing additional procedures to ensure workers are not asked to pay recruitment fees by agencies. It can also include training for recruitment agencies. </li>\r\n<li><strong>No</strong>: if no preventive measures have been taken. </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Training for employees",
        "Training for suppliers",
        "Targeted audits & on-site visits",
        "Recruitment processes",
        "Other preventive measures",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "German Supply Chain Act report (Bericht zum LksG)",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 181,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 177,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Preventive_Measures_mHRDD_pilot+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19877112,
      "name": "Walk Free+Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence Report",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Mandatory_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence_Report.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence Report",
      "question": "Did the company produce a statement in relation to any Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence legislation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">This metric records whether the company produced a statement in accordance with any Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence legislation, for example: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">German Supply Chain Act (Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz, or LKSG)</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">The Norwegian Transparency Act (Act relating to enterprises’ transparency and work on fundamental human rights and decent working conditions.</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">The French Corporate Duty of Vigilance (Devoir de Vigilance). Companies are required to publish a \"vigilance plan\".</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">This metric asks whether the company has published a statement in relation to the German Supply Chain Act (LKSG), the Norwegian Transparency Act, or the French Corporate Duty of Vigilance. </p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">If you can find a relevant statement give the company a \"Yes\" for the corresponding legislation. For example, if you find a report under the Norwegian Transparency Act, please select \"Yes - Norwegian Transparency Act\".</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Reports can be found on companies' website. </p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; color: #ff0000;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">* Note on choosing the Year of your answer</span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example:</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\"><br style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">April </span>2019 = 2018<br style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">Statement for FY2018/19 ending in <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">May</span> 2019 (or later) = 2019</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes - German Supply Chain Act (LKSG)",
        "Yes - Norwegian Transparency Act",
        "Yes - French Corporate Duty of Vigilance",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "German Supply Chain Act report (Bericht zum LksG)",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 103,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 99,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Mandatory_Human_Rights_Due_Diligence_Report+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 19884143,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Freedom of association and collective bargaining",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Freedom of association and collective bargaining",
      "question": "Does the company report publicly on the number or percentage of supplier facilities with democratically elected unions and that are covered by collective bargaining agreements?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (FTI1 === \"Yes\" && FTI2 === \"Yes\") {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else if (CCC === \"Yes\") {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~5822378",
          "name": "FTI1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~5822388",
          "name": "FTI2"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~13179121",
          "name": "CCC"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1590,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 378,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Freedom_of_association_and_collective_bargaining+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20244499,
      "name": "Walk Free+Identification of risks (mHRDD pilot)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Identification_of_risks_mHRDD_pilot.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Identification of risks (mHRDD pilot)",
      "question": "Does the company’s report identify specific geographic regions (e.g. Indonesia), industries (e.g. agriculture), resources (e.g. Palm Oil) or types of workforce (e.g. migrant workers) where the risk of modern slavery is the greatest?\"",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Understanding where the risk of modern slavery occurs, and assessing its level of importance, ensures that companies <em style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">are able to</em> put the most appropriate remedies in place. Disclosing in a modern slavery statement where this risk is helps to illustrate the effectiveness of risk assessment tools outlined in the previous metric.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">This metric is used to assess Duty of Vigilance statements, German Supply Chain Acts reports, and Norwegian Transparency Act reports.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Does the company’s statement <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">identify the greatest risks</span> of modern slavery in its organisation and supply chain? The company must explicitly state the specific geographic regions, industries, resources or types of workforce where the risk is greatest.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">The answer to this metric question may thus be one or several of these options:</p>\r\n<ol style=\"box-sizing: border-box; padding-left: 2rem; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">Geographic</span> - exposure may be greater in countries where protection against breaches of human rights are limited, particularly for migrant workers.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">Industry</span> - certain industries are more at risk of modern slavery than others. For example, those working in the extractives industry may differ to the risk in manufacturing. Risks linked to industries are of a more general nature than risks linked to specific resources, products or services.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">Resource, products and services</span> - some resources, products and services<span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; color: var(--bs-body-color); font-size: 1rem; text-align: var(--bs-body-text-align);\"> are more associated with modern slavery than others. For example, the extraction of mica or palm oil has been associated with high levels of debt bondage.</span> Adult care services have been linked to rising modern slavery risks.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">Workforce</span> - some workers are more vulnerable to modern slavery than others. For example, temporary, seasonal or migrant workers may not be covered by local labour laws, or may not be as aware of their rights. Prisoners are also vulnerable to modern slavery. </p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Please note this metric requires an explicit statement of the risk and where it occurs, it cannot apply to general statements about high levels of risk. Statements of a general nature are accepted, as long as the risks and the specific geographic regions, industries, resources/products/services or types of workforce are identified.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">If a company lists countries or geographic regions (such as South Asia) where the risk of modern slavery is high, please select the <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">“Geographic”</span> value.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">If a company identifies specific industries (such as the mining or apparel industry) where the risk of modern slavery is high, please select the <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">“Industry”</span> value.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">If a company identifies specific resources (such as mica or palm oil) as being associated with modern slavery, please select the <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">“Resource”</span> value.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">If a company describes a specific type of worker that is vulnerable to modern slavery, please select the <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">“Workforce”</span> value.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">***Please select as many values as apply.***</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">If the business indicates if it will identify risks specific to modern slavery or is planning to do so in the future, please indicate <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">“In Development”.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Where there are no details of specific risks, please give a <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">“No” </span>value.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">For each value, please include a comment that copies relevant information from the statement.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Geographic",
        "Industry",
        "Resource/products and services",
        "Workforce",
        "In Development",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "German Supply Chain Act report (Bericht zum LksG)",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 181,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 177,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Identification_of_risks_mHRDD_pilot+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20244516,
      "name": "Walk Free+Incidents identified (mHRDD pilot)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Incidents_identified_mHRDD_pilot.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Incidents identified (mHRDD pilot)",
      "question": "Has the company identified at least one incident related to modern slavery?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Given the size of the problem and the complex and far-reaching nature of the supply chains of large companies, it is perhaps not surprising that incidents of modern slavery in supply chains can be common. Companies should present an accurate picture rather than seeking to cover up problems. Revealing these incidents in their statements shows business partners and consumers that companies are taking the issue seriously, and have effective risk assessment strategies in place.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">This metric is used to assess Duty of Vigilance statements, German Supply Chain Acts reports, and Norwegian Transparency Act reports.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Has the company identified at least one incident related to modern slavery risks?</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;\">‘Incident’ (violations, non-compliances) is defined as a case study or description of any case of violation of the company policies or local laws involving an individual or group of individuals. Companies can identify different types of violations, ranging from modern slavery cases to other types of incidents, such as health and safety or payment of recruitment fees. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;\">Because definitions of modern slavery vary, incidents described in modern slavery statements (e.g. recruitment fees) do not always qualify as cases of modern slavery or forced labour, even though they are often considered as indicators or risk factors. This is why we are trying to capture the different categories of incidents disclosed by companies. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;\">Please note, the incident </span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;\">must refer to a specific example</span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;\">, not a general description of risk, which is covered by the metric 'MSA Identification of risks'. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 12pt; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;\">The answer options are the following: </span></p>\r\n<ul style=\"box-sizing: border-box; padding-left: 2rem; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff; padding-inline-start: 48px;\">\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box; list-style-type: disc; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">Modern slavery</span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">: cases of forced labour, child labour, state-imposed forced labour. </span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">The statement must refer to cases of modern slavery that the company recognizes as such, not to cases in which the company has identified a risk of modern slavery. </span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box; list-style-type: disc; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">Recruitment fees</span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">: cases in which workers paid fees to agencies or brokers for recruitment and placement in jobs, abuse of debt, and deposits.</span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box; list-style-type: disc; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">Freedom of movement and association: </span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">passport confiscation, restrictions on freedom of movement, confinement at workplace, prohibition of workers association. </span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box; list-style-type: disc; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">Wages and benefits</span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">: underpayment, withholding of wages, unpaid overtime, wages under the legal minimum or living wage level, and wage deductions. </span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box; list-style-type: disc; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">Working Hours: </span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">working hours above the legal maximum, excessive</span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\"> </span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">overtime, mandatory overtime. </span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box; list-style-type: disc; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">Working conditions</span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">: hazardous/unsafe conditions, health issues caused by work, workplace abuse and harassment.</span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box; list-style-type: disc; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; line-height: 1.38;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">Other incidents: </span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">data protection, discrimination, etc. </span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\"> </p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11.5pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #1d1c1d; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;\">No: </span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;\">If the company did not identify any incidents, or there is no relevant information in the statement, give them a value of “No”.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;\"><span style=\"color: #1d1c1d; font-size: 15.3333px;\">If incidents are mentioned but not described precisely enough for us to categorize them, select No. </span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Modern slavery",
        "Recruitment fees",
        "Freedom of movement",
        "Wages and benefits",
        "Working Hours",
        "Working conditions",
        "Other incidents",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "German Supply Chain Act report (Bericht zum LksG)",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 181,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 177,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Incidents_identified_mHRDD_pilot+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20244541,
      "name": "Walk Free+Incidents remediation (mHRDD pilot)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Incidents_remediation_mHRDD_pilot.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Incidents remediation (mHRDD pilot)",
      "question": "In the report, does the company explain one or more of the corrective steps it has taken (or would take) in response to modern slavery incidents in their operations and/or supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Should a company find instances of modern slavery in its own operations and/or supply chain, the company has a responsibility to respect the human rights of those affected, and should take steps to investigate and ‘provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes’ (<a href=\"http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"box-sizing: border-box; transition: 0.3s; color: #7164d0; text-underline-offset: 2px;\">UN Guiding Principles</a>). This can include taking <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 1rem;\">collaborative approaches, such as working with the supplier to tackle the problem through corrective action plans, or more </span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 1rem;\">punitive action such as cancelling contracts with the supplier. Working with suppliers will help to prevent such instances occurring in the future and will reinforce respect for human rights throughout the supply chain.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Remediation policies can be in place regardless of whether incidents have been identified. Where the company has identified at least one incident of slavery, this question can be answered in relation to their response to those incidents.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Where the company has not identified any incidents of slavery, this question should be answered based on whether they describe a clear plan or policy for remediating such incidents should they be identified in future.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">The option \"Remediation is mentioned but no details of the process or measures\" was added in 2024.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">This metric is used to assess Duty of Vigilance statements, German Supply Chain Acts reports, and Norwegian Transparency Act reports.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Has the company disclosed the steps it would take if a supplier or internal department is found to be engaging in any activities related to modern slavery or human trafficking?</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Examples of corrective steps include:</p>\r\n<ol style=\"box-sizing: border-box; padding-left: 2rem; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem;\">Providing remediation direct to the worker affected (backpayment of wages, support to prosecute or pursue a civil claim etc.)</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem;\">Informing senior management of instances of modern slavery</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem;\">Taking steps to support or work with the supplier to respond to instances of modern slavery by instigating corrective action plans, or</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem;\">Canceling the contracts of suppliers who are found to use modern slavery</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">If the company specifies the remediation available for individual workers affected by modern slavery, such as back payment of wages or support to pursue a claim, please select the <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">“Worker remediation”</span> value. </p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">If the company specifies that senior management will be informed if instances of modern slavery have been identified, please select the <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">“Senior management”</span> value. <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; background-color: #fbeeb8;\">Note: Reports to an authority, only counts if it is clear the </span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; background-color: #fbeeb8;\">authority </span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; background-color: #fbeeb8;\">is from Senior Management.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">If the company supports the supplier to respond to instances of modern slavery, please select the <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">“Corrective action plan”</span> value.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">If the company identifies potential punitive action, such as canceling supplier contracts, select the \"<strong>Cancel contracts\" </strong>option. <span style=\"background-color: #fbeeb8;\"><strong>Note:</strong> Also select this option if the company explicitly states that no contracts were canceled, as this implies they would take such action if an incident occurs.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">If the company mentions remediation but does not provide any details about the nature of the measures or processes, select <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">\"Remediation is mentioned but no details of the processes or measures\".</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">If no such information exists in the statement, then please select<span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\"> “No”</span>.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">Please select as many options as apply.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Please include a comment that copies relevant information from the statement.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">If the remediation action described in the statement is not listed above among the possible answer options, please include the information from the statement in the comments section, and flag for review.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">If the business indicates it is developing a remediation policy or planning to implement one in the future, please indicate <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">“In Development” </span>and again provide details in the comment.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Worker remediation",
        "Corrective action plan",
        "Senior management",
        "Cancel contracts",
        "In Development",
        "Remediation is mentioned but no details of the process or measures",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "German Supply Chain Act report (Bericht zum LksG)",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 181,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 177,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Incidents_remediation_mHRDD_pilot+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20244563,
      "name": "Walk Free+Whistleblowing mechanism (mHRDD pilot)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Whistleblowing_mechanism_mHRDD_pilot.json",
      "designer": "Walk Free",
      "title": "Whistleblowing mechanism (mHRDD pilot)",
      "question": "Does the company describe a grievance mechanism to facilitate whistle-blowing or the reporting of suspected incidents of slavery or trafficking?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Businesses should provide a hotline or other grievance mechanism so that anyone part of or witness to their operations and supply chains may report or flag suspected incidents of slavey or trafficking. As part of business’ responsibility to respect worker’s rights, those affected by modern slavery and those witnessing violations in any part of a company’s operations should be able to freely report incidents. These mechanisms should be clear and transparent, and any incidents should be recorded and monitored. </p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">This metric is used to assess Duty of Vigilance statements, German Supply Chain Acts reports, and Norwegian Transparency Act reports.</span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Does the company provide a <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">hotline</span> or <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">reporting mechanism</span> where grievances or suspected incidents of slavery or trafficking can be reported for <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">direct employees and/or supply chains workers</span>?</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">A whistleblowing mechanisms may include:</p>\r\n<ol style=\"box-sizing: border-box; padding-left: 2rem; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem;\">A<span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\"> reporting line or hotline</span> that workers can call (reporting managed by third parties, or reporting platforms like a 'Speak Up' tool, not policy, fall in this category too) </p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">Whistleblower protections</span> for employees so they will not be penalised if they report modern slavery cases (mention of any kind of protection is sufficient e.g. \"<em style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">we ensure that anyone raising such concern will not suffer dismissal, disciplinary action, threats or other unfavourable treatment as a result\" </em>). If the disclosure specifies that grievances can be reported anonymously or confidentially, that also is sufficient for this answer option. <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; background-color: #fbeeb8;\">Key words: Retaliation, repercussions, fear, reprisal, detriment </span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem;\">An <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">employee or independent focal point</span> to whom reports can be made. A focal point is in place permanently. If the statement states that reports of violations can be shared with auditors or other personnel operating at the company on a temporary basis, they would not qualify as a focal point.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">A <em style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">direct employee</em> is someone who is working directly for the company either in the company head office or in regional offices.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">A <em style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">supply chain worker</em> is someone who is employed by contractors or sub-contractors further down the supply chain.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">For many companies the risk of forced labour is much greater within their supply chain rather than in their own operations - as such the provision of a mechanism that extends to workers within the company’s supply chain is regarded as a positive step.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Please <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">select as many mechanisms as apply</span>.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">NOTE: 'Speak Up' or any other policy can be sufficient to meet the answer 'Hotline, Email, Contact Form' if details are provided specifying how workers' concerns can be raised. If it is not explicitly stated, it cannot be assumed.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">Where there is no mention in the statement of who the mechanism applies to, please assume it applies only to direct employees</span>.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">If the business indicates it is developing a whistleblowing or grievance mechanism or planning to implement one in the future, please indicate<span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\"> “In Development” </span>and again give details in the comments section.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Please select <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">\"No\" </span>if no whistleblowing mechanism is described in the statement.</p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">For each value, please include a comment that copies relevant information from the statement. If the policy that you wish to include is not listed, please add a comment and flag the section for review.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Hotline Email Contact Form  direct employees",
        "Hotline Email Contact Form  supply chain workers",
        "Whistleblower protection  direct employees",
        "Whistleblower protection  supply chain workers",
        "Focal Point  direct employees",
        "Focal Point  supply chain workers",
        "In Development  direct employees",
        "In Development  supply chain workers",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "German Supply Chain Act report (Bericht zum LksG)",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 181,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 177,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Walk_Free+Whistleblowing_mechanism_mHRDD_pilot+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20292094,
      "name": "Toni Anne McTaggart+Employees, GRI 102-8-a (formerly G4-10-a)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Toni_Anne_McTaggart+Employees_GRI_102_8_a_formerly_G4_10_a.json",
      "designer": "Toni Anne McTaggart",
      "title": "Employees, GRI 102-8-a (formerly G4-10-a)",
      "question": "What is the company's total number of employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "78,000",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Toni_Anne_McTaggart+Employees_GRI_102_8_a_formerly_G4_10_a+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20297476,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Discloses facility level wage data",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Discloses_facility_level_wage_data.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Discloses facility level wage data",
      "question": "Does the company disclose wage data at facility level for their supply chain facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project is co-funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative tool called Fashion Checker.<br><br><a href=\"https://fashionchecker.org/\">Fashion Checker</a> enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company discloses <strong>worker wage data at facility level</strong> for their supply chain facilities. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents for the company's supply chain disclosures. This might be a supply chain report, sustainability/transparency report or a list of suppliers. <br><br><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and Search Terms</span><br><br>- Supply chain<br>- Supply chain disclosure<br>- Wages<br><br><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answer Input</span><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information.<br><br>Please note: 'Unknown' is not a possible answer for this metric.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Supplier List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 256,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 255,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Wage_Data_Disclosure.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Discloses_facility_level_wage_data+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20297487,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Supply Chain Wage Data Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Wage_Data_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Supply Chain Wage Data Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose wage data at facility level for their supply chain facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project is co-funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative tool called Fashion Checker.<br><br><a href=\"https://fashionchecker.org/\">Fashion Checker</a> enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Clean Clothes Campaign+Supply Chain Wage Data Disclosure+Clean Clothes Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  if (m1 === \"Yes\" || m3 === \"Yes\" || [m2].flat().includes(\"Weekly take-home wage (assessed from 2023)\")) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~20297476",
          "name": "m1"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~5821888",
          "name": "m2"
        },
        {
          "unknown": "Unknown",
          "not_researched": "Unknown",
          "metric": "~22210831",
          "name": "m3"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1567,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 361,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Wage_Data_Disclosure+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Wage_Data_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20313671,
      "name": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology+MSA Organizational Structure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Organizational_Structure.json",
      "designer": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology",
      "title": "MSA Organizational Structure",
      "question": "Does the company describes its ownership structures? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<h5>Criteria 2.1: Organizational Structure</h5>\r\n<p>The structure is the legal and organizational form of the reporting entity. A reporting entity can describe its structure in multiple ways.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>A reporting entity can describe its structure in multiple ways. For example, it can:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Explain its general structure.</strong> This covers the entity’s legal classification  (company, partnership, trust, etc.). If the entity is part of a larger group, the  statement should provide details on the general structure of the overall group  (upstream and downstream from the reporting entity). The statement may also  describe the approximate number of workers employed by the entity and the  registered office location of the entity (i.e., its statutory address). </li>\r\n<li><strong>Explain what the entity owns or controls.</strong> If the entity does own or control  other entities, explain what these entities do and where they are located. For  example, the entity may own a foreign subsidiary in another country. </li>\r\n<li><strong>Identify any trading names or brand names</strong> associated with the reporting  entity and entities it owns or controls.  </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><em>Note: the presence of any relevant information should lead to a \"Yes\" label for this  requirement.</em></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unclear"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8207,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4942,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Organizational_Structure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20314073,
      "name": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology+MSA Organizational Operations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Organizational_Operations.json",
      "designer": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology",
      "title": "MSA Organizational Operations",
      "question": "Does the company describes its operations? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<h5>Criteria 2.2: Organizational Operations</h5>\r\n<p>The operations cover the activities undertaken by the reporting entity or any of its owned or controlled entities to pursue its business objectives and strategy in Australia or overseas.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>An entity can describe its operations by:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Explaining the nature and types of activities undertaken by the entity (for example, mining, retail, manufacturing) and any entities it owns or controls;</li>\r\n<li>Identifying the countries or regions where the entity's operations are located or take place; or</li>\r\n<li>Providing facts and figures about the entity's operations, such as factories, offices, franchises, and/or stores.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Here are examples of the types of activities that a reporting entity might describe:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li><strong>The direct purpose of employment of their workers. </strong>For example, a manufacturing company may describe that workers operate the company’s manufacturing facilities.</li>\r\n<li><strong>Processing, production, research and development, or construction activities. </strong>For example, a dairy food company may describe the processing and production of milk products. A building company may describe the construction of commercial and/or residential buildings. A mining company may describe its ore processing activities as well as activities related to the construction of new facilities to ship ore products. A medical research company may describe the development and trial of new medicines.</li>\r\n<li><strong>Charitable or religious activities.</strong> For example, a large bank may describe the activities of its charitable foundation, such as donations to child welfare projects overseas. An animal protection charity may describe its work to safeguard threatened habitats overseas. A religious entity may describe its provision of religious services, such as marriages.</li>\r\n<li><strong>The purchase, marketing, sale, delivery, or distribution of products or services.</strong> For example, a marketing agency may describe its activities to market the goods of another company. An accounting firm may describe the provision of financial services to clients. A charitable aged care facility may describe the delivery of aged care services. A bank may describe its financial lending services for its clients. A food and beverage company may describe the distribution of its products through a dedicated transport network it owns and operates. A property developer may describe the purchasing of land overseas. A hotel chain might describe how franchises deliver its services to clients across different locations.</li>\r\n<li><strong>Ancillary activities required for the main operations of the entity. </strong>For example, a mining company may provide transportation to remote locations for its employees. A software development company may offer child care services to its employees.</li>\r\n<li><strong>Financial investments.</strong> For example, fund managers may describe internally managed investment portfolios and assets. Investments may also include financial investments in joint ventures. For example, an oil company may describe investments in a non-operated joint venture for an offshore oil rig. Note: Externally managed portfolios, such as those managed by another fund manager, may be more appropriately considered part of the reporting entity’s supply chains.</li>\r\n<li><strong>Managed/operated joint ventures.</strong> For example, a mining company may describe domestic and overseas joint ventures that it directly manages/operates.</li>\r\n<li><strong>Leasing of property, products, or services.</strong> For example, a ship leasing business may describe its leasing of vessels. A property owner (or a leasing company) may describe the leasing of retail shops, commercial and/or industrial facilities.</li>\r\n</ol>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unclear"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8207,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4942,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Organizational_Operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20314338,
      "name": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology+MSA Supply Chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology",
      "title": "MSA Supply Chain",
      "question": "Does the company identify their supplier or geographic regions, industries or sector in which their suppliers are located?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<h5>Critera 2.3: Supply chains</h5>\r\n<p>The supply chains refer to the sequences of processes involved in the procurement of products and services (including labour) that contribute to the reporting entity's own products and services. Supply chains are not restricted to \"tier one\" (or direct) suppliers in the context of the statements; these should cover suppliers of products and services in Australia or overseas that extend beyond the reporting entity's direct suppliers.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>An entity can describe their supply chains in multiple ways, such as by describing:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li><strong>Products provided by suppliers.</strong> For example, a supermarket's supply chains include the provision of frozen vegetables via a wholesaler. A hospital's supply chains include the procurement of rubber gloves. A bank's supply chains include the procurement of uniforms and office supplies.</li>\r\n<li><strong>Services provided by suppliers.</strong> For example, a law firm's supply chains include the cleaning services provided to the law firm by a contractor. The supply chains of a superannuation fund or fund manager include its external investment managers, who provide a service by managing its portfolios. A building company's supply chains include its specialist subcontractors.</li>\r\n<li><strong>The location, category, or other attributes of the suppliers.</strong> For example, a company may state that they only interact with suppliers from a specific country or location (e.g. \"Bahamas\", or \"overseas\"). They may also describe constraints on the origin of workers in their supply chain (e.g. by mentioning that they prefer indigenous suppliers, or go with client preferences). A company may also describe a supplier based on the category of supplies it provides (e.g. \"commodity chemicals suppliers\").</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p><em>Notes: </em></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><em>The presence of any relevant information should lead to a \"Yes\" label for this requirement.</em></li>\r\n<li><em>Descriptions of products and services used by indirect suppliers in the reporting entity's supply chain must also be extracted as supporting text. For example, the description of the supply chains of an electronics manufacturer should ideally include the mining and refining of minerals used in electronic components purchased by the electronics manufacturer.</em></li>\r\n<li><em>References to any disclosures or documents by the reporting entity about the identity of their suppliers (such as a public supplier list) should be extracted as supporting text. The contents of those documents should however never be extracted.</em></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unclear"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8207,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4942,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20314500,
      "name": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology+MSA Risk Assessement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Risk_Assessement.json",
      "designer": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology",
      "title": "MSA Risk Assessement",
      "question": "Does the company identify and describe risks of modern slavery in its operations and supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<h5>Criteria 3.1: Risk descriptions</h5>\r\n<p>The reporting entity should describe in its statement the modern slavery risks in its operations and supply chains. By “risk of modern slavery”, we mean the potential for the entity to cause or to contribute to modern slavery through its domestic and international operations and through its supply chains.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The reporting entity might describe its modern slavery risks in relation to specific: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>geographic regions (e.g. Indonesia, south-east asia, or simply \"overseas\"); </li>\r\n<li>industries or industrial sectors (e.g. maritime shipping, or agriculture); </li>\r\n<li>resources or commodities that are commonly tied to modern slavery (e.g. petroleum, palm oil, electronics, cocoa, conflict minerals); </li>\r\n<li>product/service categories (e.g. fast fashion, gig work); </li>\r\n<li>workforces (e.g. migrant workers, temporary workers, third-party labour); </li>\r\n<li>world events (e.g. sporting events, natural disasters, the COVID-19 pandemic); </li>\r\n<li>existing or past cases of modern slavery; </li>\r\n<li>individual risks (i.e. risks tied to specific entities or suppliers linked with the reporting entity). </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>While entities may not have directly identified modern slavery cases (or, synonymously, incidents, issues, or situations) in their operations or supply chains, every entity possesses modern slavery risks that need to be declared. </p>\r\n<p><em>Notes: </em></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><em>Stating that the reporting entity in its entirety has a \"low risk\" of modern slavery or that its operations or supply chains are \"slavery-free\" is not sufficient to fulfill this requirement. The reporting entity needs to describe at least one specific area of its supply chains or operations that has a modern slavery risk (whether low or not), or an actual case of modern slavery. </em></li>\r\n<li><em>If the reporting entity only describes an actual case of modern slavery and describes no other risk, the label for this question should still be Yes. </em></li>\r\n<li><em>Modern slavery risks and cases can be properly declared without naming specific operations, subsidiaries, suppliers, facilities, or products. For example, a reporting entity may adequately declare its risks by reporting that it \"identified risks relating to its sourcing of timber products from countries A, B and C, which may be produced using forced labor\", or that it \"has suppliers providing cleaning services at higher risk for breaches of modern slavery obligations\".</em></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unclear"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8207,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4942,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Risk_Assessement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20314649,
      "name": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology+MSA Risk Remediation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Risk_Remediation.json",
      "designer": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology",
      "title": "MSA Risk Remediation",
      "question": "Does the company reports the existence and/or implementation of remediation processes for addressing issues linked to modern slavery?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<h5>Criteria 3.2: Modern slavery remediation</h5>\r\n<p>If one or more cases (or, synonymously, incidents, issues, or situations) have been declared by the reporting entity where it caused or contributed to modern slavery, the statement should describe the actions taken to remediate (or, synonymously, manage, address, or remedy) these cases. If no modern slavery case has been identified by the reporting entity, it may still describe an action plan used to remediate hypothetical cases if one should occur in the future. This is relevant information for this requirement.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The supporting text for this criteria should clearly refer to actions proposed by the reporting entity to remediate modern slavery cases, and not to actions proposed to mitigate the risks of modern slavery. The remediation actions could ensure that the harm that was caused cannot recur, they could include formal apologies and compensation, and they could lead to a stop in certain activities of the reporting entity. </p>\r\n<p>Specifically, examples of corrective actions and sanctions to remediate modern slavery cases include:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Inquiries and investigations into instances of modern slavery involving stakeholders;</li>\r\n<li>Workerassistance (e.g. giving back passports or helping file legal claims);</li>\r\n<li>Compensation (e.g. paying owed wages, penalties, or indemnities);</li>\r\n<li>Issuing formal apologies;</li>\r\n<li>Notifying management, authorities, or other organizations of incidents;</li>\r\n<li>Stopping business activities with partners or suppliers who are in violation (i.e., by canceling or terminating contracts).</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unclear"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8207,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4942,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Risk_Remediation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20314746,
      "name": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology+MSA Risk Mitigation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Risk_Mitigation.json",
      "designer": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology",
      "title": "MSA Risk Mitigation",
      "question": "Does the company describes the actions take to mitigate modern slavery risks?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<h5>Criteria 4: Risk mitigation</h5>\r\n<p>After describing the risks they face, reporting entities are required to describe how these risks are mitigated. This is done by describing the actions taken by the reporting entity to identify and assess risks as well as to avoid causing or contributing to modern slavery.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Mitigation actions may include:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Participating in or launching industry initiatives (e.g. UN Global Compact, or Finance Against Slavery and Trafficking Initiative), or by providing financial support to such initiatives;</li>\r\n<li>Requiring suppliers and third-party entities to comply with internal, regional, or international policies or labor laws;</li>\r\n<li>Requiring employees, suppliers, or other stakeholders to follow training sessions on modern slavery;</li>\r\n<li>Adopting or updating internal modern slavery-related policies, frameworks or standards, for instance:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Adopting formal processes used to identify and assess modern slavery risks. These processes may include:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Conducting desk research by reviewing secondary sources of information (e.g. reports from international organizations, frameworks such as the UN Guiding Principles, or research papers and articles on modern slavery) or by reviewing external expert advisers’ inputs;</li>\r\n<li>Utilizing risk management tools or software (e.g. SEDEX);</li>\r\n<li>Conducting risk-based questionnaires, surveys, or interviews with employees, suppliers, or other stakeholders;</li>\r\n<li>Auditing, screening, or directly engaging with employees, suppliers, or other stakeholders.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>Committing to paying all employees, migrant workers, temporary workers, and third-party workers a “living wage”, to support their freedom of association (or unionization), or to support collective bargaining;</li>\r\n<li>Adopting a code of conduct or code of ethics that relates to combatting or preventing modern slavery and forced labour practices; 110○ Incorporating provisions for onboarding and engaging with suppliers, including contract clauses and requirements, and extending the code of conduct to cover suppliers;</li>\r\n<li>Enforcing responsible recruitment of workers (e.g., by not allowing the payment of recruitment fees by workers, or by not withholding part of their compensation for housing or licensing costs);</li>\r\n<li>Implementing responsible procurement practices when establishing new supply chains (e.g., no excessive pressure on lead times for products or services they source);</li>\r\n<li>Having a zero-tolerance policy that would force the entity to take action regarding threats, regarding intimidation and attacks against human rights defenders, or regarding modern slavery cases tied to their suppliers;</li>\r\n<li>Establishing a whistleblowing policy that encourages and safeguards workers, employees, suppliers, or other stakeholders when reporting concerns;</li>\r\n<li>Ensuring the application of these policies or frameworks by having an executive or board member participate in their elaboration or in oversight committees.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><em>Notes:</em></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><em>Vague language stating that the reporting entity has “zero tolerance” towards modern slavery without mentioning a policy in this regard, or that it “is committed to fight” modern slavery is very common. However, such declarations are not evidence of risk mitigation by themselves. These declarations should be linked with an actual company policy or linked to industrial initiatives or certifications frameworks. If no other relevant information is found, the correct label in statements containing only such declarations is NO.</em></li>\r\n<li><em>Not all policies adopted by an entity may be relevant to modern slavery. If a policy does not explicitly cover modern slavery (which includes forced labour, human trafficking, child labour, etc.), then the entity should itself detail why it is relevant in this context for it to be considered evidence of a risk mitigation action. Only extract policy-related sentences if the policy is truly linked to modern slavery practices somewhere in the statement.</em></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unclear"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8207,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4942,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Risk_Mitigation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20314940,
      "name": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology+MSA Performance Indicators",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Performance_Indicators.json",
      "designer": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology",
      "title": "MSA Performance Indicators",
      "question": "Does the modern slavery statement define the performance indicators against which the company measures the effectiveness of its actions to combat slavery and trafficking? E.g. number of audits done, number of employee training provided",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<h5>Criteria 5: Assessing the effectiveness of actions</h5>\r\n<p>The reporting entity should describe in its statement how it assesses the effectiveness of actions taken to mitigate risks as well as to remediate modern slavery cases. This is important to ensure that the entity knows whether these actions are actually helping combat modern slavery.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The supporting text for this criteria should relate to the examination of whether the measures and processes implemented by the reporting entity are successful in achieving their intended goals related to mitigating risks and remediating cases of modern slavery. In practical terms, this means evaluating how well the company's strategies and initiatives are performing in practice. This assessment often involves tracking key performance indicators, monitoring the outcomes of risk mitigation efforts, seeking feedback from stakeholders, and conducting regular reviews to ensure that the actions in place align with the company's commitment to address modern slavery. </p>\r\n<p>Specifically, assessing the effectiveness of actions can be accomplished by:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Examining or revising action plans or policies, such as by forming a review committee or conducting annual assessments, to ensure that:</li>\r\n<li>they remain up to date, particularly when operating in high-risk countries, regions, or industries;</li>\r\n<li>they adhere to the internal organization guidelines regarding application deadlines or in terms of uniformity in their application; or</li>\r\n<li>they have the intended results (e.g. in terms of dissuasive power).</li>\r\n<li>Setting up a feedback process between key departments (or across owned or controlled entities) to facilitate regular engagement and communication among procurement, human resource management, and legal teams;</li>\r\n<li>Engaging with industry groups, external auditors, trusted NGOs, or stakeholders (such as the workers themselves) to provide feedback and/or conduct an independent review of actions;</li>\r\n<li>Implementing internal checks to evaluate the efficiency of the actions of risk identification, mitigation or remediation processes;</li>\r\n<li>Reviewing trends in reported modern slavery cases through grievance or whistleblowing mechanisms and evaluating the handling of these cases;</li>\r\n<li>Reporting and monitoring Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that measure the effectiveness of actions, such as:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>The number of contracts in which modern slavery cases were identified;</li>\r\n<li>The number of trainings delivered to employees, suppliers, or other stakeholders;</li>\r\n<li>The awareness of employees, suppliers, or other stakeholders towards modern slavery as measured through polls;</li>\r\n<li>The number of initiatives taken to enhance suppliers' capacity to respond to modern slavery risks;</li>\r\n<li>The number of filed grievances;</li>\r\n<li>The resolution rates of reports filed through grievance or whistleblowing mechanisms;</li>\r\n<li>The number of completed audits;</li>\r\n<li>The number of visits in facilities operated by the reporting entity, by one of its owned or controlled entities, or by a third-party;</li>\r\n<li>The number of assigned and completed corrective action plans;</li>\r\n<li>The number of contracts canceled due to identified modern slavery cases;</li>\r\n<li>The number of identified modern slavery incidents.  </li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><em>Note: entities will often state that they \"improved their modern slavery risk mitigation\" over a reporting period, but this is not useful information for this question. Supporting text for this question should instead detail how the reporting entity determined that its actions were effective or not effective. For example, if the reporting entity stated that it \"improved its modern slavery risk mitigation actions following a comprehensive review process\", then it can be considered relevant for this question.</em></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unclear"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8207,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4942,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Performance_Indicators+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20315064,
      "name": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology+MSA Consultation Process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Consultation_Process.json",
      "designer": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology",
      "title": "MSA Consultation Process",
      "question": "Does the statement describe consulting with any entities that it owns or controls?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<h5>Criteria 6: Process of consultation</h5>\r\n<p>This mandatory reporting criterion requires statements given by reporting entities to describe how they consulted on the preparation of their statement with any entities they own or control. If the reporting entity owns or controls other entities, the reporting entity must describe their process of consultation. Proper consultation ensures that all relevant areas of the reporting entity and any entities it owns or controls are aware of what actions they need to take and that modern slavery risks relating to these areas and entities have been identified, assessed, and addressed. If the reporting entity does not own or control other entities, it does not need to describe their process of consultation, but it needs to explicitly indicate so in the statement.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><em>Notes:</em></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><em>If the reporting entity states that it has consulted with any owned or controlled entities, the label for this question should still be \"Yes\".</em></li>\r\n<li><em>If the reporting entity has stated that it does not own or control other entities, then the label for this question should be \"No\".</em></li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unclear"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8207,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 4942,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Consultation_Process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20315196,
      "name": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology+MSA Signed by Responsible Member",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Signed_by_Responsible_Member.json",
      "designer": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology",
      "title": "MSA Signed by Responsible Member",
      "question": "Was the Modern Slavery Act statement signed by a responsible member of the reporting entity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<h5>Signature</h5>\r\n<p>Section 13 of the Act requires statements given by single reporting entities to be signed by a responsible member of the reporting entity. Section 14 of the Act sets out the same requirement for joint statements. In case there is a joint statement, the signature of a responsible member of one reporting entity's governing body is sufficient. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>A responsible member is a decision-making member of the reporting entity. Where a reporting entity has a principal governing body, the responsible member will be a member of that body. </p>\r\n<p>A statement cannot be signed by individuals who do not meet the definition of a responsible member. </p>\r\n<p>It is important to ensure that the text accompanying the signature shows that the individual signing has the authority to sign the statement by including all the following information:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>The name of the responsible member; </li>\r\n<li>The title or position (e.g., CEO, Director, Member of the Board, Chairman, President, etc.) of the responsible member; and </li>\r\n<li>A copy of their signature (an image) OR wording to explicitly indicate the signature of the statement (e.g. \"signed by\", \"signature\", \"s/\", a signature ID, or any form of electronic signature).</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>For this criterion, we should also check for a signature date, if available.</p>\r\n<p><em>Note: when extracting the supporting text for this criterion, if there are small segments of irrelevant formatting text.</em></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unclear"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 11490,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6296,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Signed_by_Responsible_Member+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20315407,
      "name": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology+MSA Principal Governing Body Approval",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Principal_Governing_Body_Approval.json",
      "designer": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology",
      "title": "MSA Principal Governing Body Approval",
      "question": "Was the company's Modern Slavery Act statement approved by the principal governing body?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<h5><strong>Approval</strong></h5>\r\n<p>There are two categories of statements: </p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>\"Normal\" statement that pertains to a single entity subject to the law in a given year, having a turnover exceeding 100 million AUD. </li>\r\n<li>\"Joint\" statement is a collective statement from multiple entities subject to the law, each having a turnover exceeding 100 million AUD.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<h6><strong>“Normal” statement - for a single reporting entity</strong></h6>\r\n<p>Section 13 of the Act requires statements given by single reporting entities to be approved by the principal governing body of the reporting entity. </p>\r\n<p>The principal governing body is the body or group of members with primary responsibility for the governance of the reporting entity.</p>\r\n<h6><strong>“Joint” statement - for multiple entities</strong></h6>\r\n<p>Section 14 of the Act provides three options for approval of joint statements:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>OPTION ONE</strong>: The principal governing body of each reporting entity covered by the statement approves the statement.</li>\r\n<li><strong>OPTION TWO</strong>: The principal governing body of a higher entity (such as a global parent), which is in a position to influence or control each entity covered by the statement, approves the statement. The higher entity does not have to be a reporting entity itself.</li>\r\n<li><strong>OPTION THREE</strong>: If it is not practicable to comply with Option One or Option Two, the principal governing body of at least one reporting entity covered by the statement may approve the statement. In this case, the statement must also explain why this option was taken.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<h6><strong>“Normal” statement - for a single reporting entity</strong></h6>\r\n<p>The Act does not permit delegation of approval authority, including to an Individual, Executive Committee, Sub-Committee, or Workgroup. </p>\r\n<p>To ensure an entity's statement can be published on the government's Register, entities should ensure there is no ambiguity in who approved the statement. Groups like ‘Executive Leadership Committee', ‘Members of the Board', and ‘Senior Executive on behalf of the Board' leave it unclear whether the entity's principal governing body has cleared their modern slavery statement, or if it was approved by a select few members. Any language that indicates that the statement was \"considered by the board\" or \"put forward to the board\" is not sufficient to meet this criterion.</p>\r\n<p><em>Note: If the the statement is approved by the reporting entity’s principal governing body the select the option: <strong>\"Approved by the principal governing body of each reporting entity\"</strong>.</em></p>\r\n<h6><strong>“Joint” statement - for multiple entities</strong></h6>\r\n<p>Select: </p>\r\n<p><strong>\"Approved by the principal governing body of each reporting entity\"</strong>: if the principal governing body of each reporting entity covered by the statement approves the statement.</p>\r\n<p><strong>\"Approved by principal governing body of a higher entity/global parent\"</strong>: If the principal governing body of a higher entity (such as a global parent), which is in a position to influence or control each entity covered by the statement, approves the statement. The higher entity does not have to be a reporting entity itself.</p>\r\n<p><strong>\"Approved by the principal governing body of at least on reporting entity covered in statement\"</strong>: If it is not practicable to comply with Option One or Option Two and the principal governing body of at least one reporting entity covered by the statement may approve the statement. In this case, the statement must also explain why this option was taken.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Approved by the principal governing body of each reporting entity",
        "Approved by principal governing body of a higher entity/global parent",
        "Approved by the principal governing body of at least one reporting entity covered in statement",
        "Unclear",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 11490,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6296,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Principal_Governing_Body_Approval+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20315534,
      "name": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology+MSA Reporting Entities Identification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Reporting_Entities_Identification.json",
      "designer": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology",
      "title": "MSA Reporting Entities Identification",
      "question": "Does the Modern Slavery Act statement clearly identify which entities covered by the statement are relevant reporting entities? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<h5>Mandatory Criterion 1: Identify the reporting entity</h5>\r\n<p>Entities may identify who is required to report in a number of ways, but they must ensure they clearly identify the reporting entities somewhere in the statement.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To justify a label of \"yes, this criterion is satisfied\", prioritize the information according to the following cases (1-3), where only one case need apply:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>Extract all sentences from the main text (including its visual elements) thatexplicitly state who are the reporting enties:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Normal statement: when the text explicitly names a \"reporting entity\" (or similar language such as \"required to report\" or \"required to submit a modern slavery statement\").</li>\r\n<li>Joint statement: when the text explicitly names several \"reporting entities\" (or similar language such as \"required to report\" or \"required to submit a modern slavery statement\").</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>If the information above is not explicitly stated, look for an introductory sentence that clearly presents the statement issuers with entity names in the main text (including its visual elements). </li>\r\n<li>In rare cases where none of the above information is provided, if an entity name or logo are found on a title page or in a significant location in the statement, then they should be extracted only once. \r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Note: A logo should only be flagged with the \"Infographic\" category in the \"Visual Element Category\" button if it is the only way in which the entity is identified in the statement.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p>Notes:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Evidence for this criterion is most commonly found on the first page of the statement but can be found anywhere in the statement.</li>\r\n<li>If there is relevant company information duplicated across multiple page footers or headers in the statement, this information should only be extracted once.</li>\r\n<li>There could be multiple reporting entities for one statement. In such cases, all of them should be extracted in the supporting text.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Unclear"
      ],
      "report_type": "Modern Slavery Statement",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 11489,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 6296,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+MSA_Reporting_Entities_Identification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 20532894,
      "name": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology+Meets Minimum Australian MSA Requirements",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements.json",
      "designer": "Mila & Queensland University of Technology",
      "title": "Meets Minimum Australian MSA Requirements",
      "question": "Does the company meet the minimum legal requirements of the Australian Modern Slavery Act?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var allTrue, criterion_0, criterion_1, criterion_2, criterion_3, criterion_4, criterion_5, criterion_6, options,\n    indexOf = [].indexOf || function(item) { for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++) { if (i in this && this[i] === item) return i; } return -1; },\n    slice = [].slice;\n\n  options = [\"Approved by the principal governing body of each reporting entity\", \"Approved by principal governing body of a higher entity/global parent\", \"Approved by the principal governing body of at least one reporting entity covered in statement\"];\n\n  criterion_0 = indexOf.call(options, approval) >= 0 && signed_by_responsible_member === \"Yes\";\n\n  criterion_1 = reporting_entities_identification === \"Yes\";\n\n  criterion_2 = organizational_structure === \"Yes\" && organizational_operations === \"Yes\" && supply_chain === \"Yes\";\n\n  criterion_3 = risk_assessment === \"Yes\" && risk_remediation === \"Yes\";\n\n  criterion_4 = risk_mitigation === \"Yes\";\n\n  criterion_5 = performance_indicators === \"Yes\";\n\n  criterion_6 = consultation_process === \"Yes\";\n\n  allTrue = function() {\n    var args;\n    args = 1 <= arguments.length ? slice.call(arguments, 0) : [];\n    return args.every(Boolean);\n  };\n\n  if (allTrue(criterion_0, criterion_1, criterion_2, criterion_3, criterion_4, criterion_5, criterion_6)) {\n    \"Yes\";\n  } else {\n    \"No\";\n  }\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~20313671",
          "name": "organizational_structure"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~20314073",
          "name": "organizational_operations"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~20314338",
          "name": "supply_chain"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~20314500",
          "name": "risk_assessment"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~20314649",
          "name": "risk_remediation"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~20314746",
          "name": "risk_mitigation"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~20314940",
          "name": "performance_indicators"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~20315064",
          "name": "consultation_process"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~20315196",
          "name": "signed_by_responsible_member"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~20315407",
          "name": "approval"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~20315534",
          "name": "reporting_entities_identification"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 8206,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 4942,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Mila_Queensland_University_of_Technology+Meets_Minimum_Australian_MSA_Requirements+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21035433,
      "name": "Vasiliki Gkatziaki+Test Network Aware Metric",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Test_Network_Aware_Metric.json",
      "designer": "Vasiliki Gkatziaki",
      "title": "Test Network Aware Metric",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Intensity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion in Transition Planning",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var avg;\n\n  avg = function(arr) {\n    var sum;\n    if (arr.length === 0) {\n      return 0;\n    }\n    sum = arr.reduce((function(a, b) {\n      return a + b;\n    }), 0);\n    return sum / arr.length;\n  };\n\n  avg(fti_2024);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "company": "Commons+Has Brands",
          "metric": "~19689949",
          "name": "fti_2024"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Test_Network_Aware_Metric+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403123,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Mean Hourly Pay Equality Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Mean_Hourly_Pay_Equality_Score.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Mean Hourly Pay Equality Score",
      "question": "To what extent is the average hourly pay between men and women equal across the organization?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric measures the degree to which men and women are paid equally on an hourly basis across the entire organization. It is based on the mean (average) hourly pay for male and female employees, regardless of job role, seniority, or function. A higher score indicates greater equality, with a score of 10 representing no difference in average hourly pay between genders.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Mean Hourly Pay Equality Score+Wikirate Research Team"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  100 - Math.min(Math.abs(MeanGenderPayGapHourly), 100);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~3453141",
          "name": "MeanGenderPayGapHourly"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 11098,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Mean_Hourly_Pay_Equality_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Mean_Hourly_Pay_Equality_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403136,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Median Hourly Pay Equality Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Median_Hourly_Pay_Equality_Score.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Median Hourly Pay Equality Score",
      "question": "To what extent is the typical hourly pay equal between men and women across the organization?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric assesses the degree of gender equality in typical hourly pay across the organization, based on the median hourly wages of male and female employees. The median is less affected by extreme values and provides a more representative view of the typical pay experience. A higher score indicates closer equality, with a score of 10 representing no difference in typical hourly pay between genders.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Median Hourly Pay Equality Score+Wikirate Research Team"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  100 - Math.min(Math.abs(MedianGenderPayGapHourly), 100);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8674635",
          "name": "MedianGenderPayGapHourly"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Median_Hourly_Pay_Equality_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Median_Hourly_Pay_Equality_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403151,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Median Hourly Pay Equality Score+Wikirate Research Team",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Median_Hourly_Pay_Equality_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Median Hourly Pay Equality Score",
      "question": "To what extent is the typical hourly pay equal between men and women across the organization?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>This metric measures the degree to which men and women are paid equally on average per hour across the organization. It is based on the mean hourly pay and is presented on a normalized scale from 0 to 10, where 10 represents full pay equality and 0 indicates maximum inequality. The normalization allows for easier comparison across organizations and reporting standards.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Hourly_Pay_Equality_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Median_Hourly_Pay_Equality_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403180,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Mean Hourly Pay Equality Score+Wikirate Research Team",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Mean_Hourly_Pay_Equality_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Mean Hourly Pay Equality Score",
      "question": "To what extent is the average hourly pay between men and women equal across the organization?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>The Mean Hourly Pay Equality Score measures the extent to which men and women are paid equally on average per hour within the organization. It is based on the mean gender pay gap and scaled from 0 to 10, where a score of 10 indicates perfect equality (no average pay gap) and a score of 0 indicates maximum inequality. This normalization allows for intuitive comparison across organizations and reporting periods.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 11098,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Hourly_Pay_Equality_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Mean_Hourly_Pay_Equality_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403187,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Hourly Pay Equality Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Hourly_Pay_Equality_Score.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Hourly Pay Equality Score",
      "question": "To what extent are men and women paid equally per hour across the organization, based on both average and typical earnings?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>The Hourly Pay Equality Score combines both the mean and median hourly pay equality scores to provide an overall assessment of gender pay equality across the organization. It reflects how equally men and women are paid on average (mean) as well as at the typical (median) level. The score is normalized on a 0–10 scale, where 10 indicates complete pay equality and 0 represents full pay inequality.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~21403180",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~21403151",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Gender_Pay_Equity_Index.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Hourly_Pay_Equality_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403194,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Mean Bonus Pay Equality Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Mean_Bonus_Pay_Equality_Score.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Mean Bonus Pay Equality Score",
      "question": "To what extent is the average bonus pay equal between men and women across the organization?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The Mean Bonus Pay Equality Score measures the degree to which men and women receive equal average bonus pay across the organization. It is calculated based on the mean bonus pay gap and presented on a 0–100 scale, where a score of 100 represents complete equality in average bonus pay, and 0 indicates maximum inequality. This metric provides insight into overall fairness in bonus distributions between genders, without adjusting for role or seniority.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Mean Bonus Pay Equality Score+Wikirate Research Team"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  100 - Math.min(Math.abs(MeanGenderPayGapBonus), 100);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8674646",
          "name": "MeanGenderPayGapBonus"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10556,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Mean_Bonus_Pay_Equality_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Mean_Bonus_Pay_Equality_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403206,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Mean Bonus Pay Equality Score+Wikirate Research Team",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Mean_Bonus_Pay_Equality_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Mean Bonus Pay Equality Score",
      "question": "To what extent is the average bonus pay equal between men and women across the organization?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>The Mean Bonus Pay Equality Score is based on the mean bonus pay gap and normalized on a 0–10 scale, where a score of 10 indicates complete equality in average bonus pay, and 0 indicates maximum inequality. This score reflects overall bonus distribution fairness but does not account for role-specific or seniority differences.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10556,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Bonus_Pay_Equality_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Mean_Bonus_Pay_Equality_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403214,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Median Bonus Pay Equality Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Median_Bonus_Pay_Equality_Score.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Median Bonus Pay Equality Score",
      "question": "To what extent is the typical bonus pay equal between men and women across the organization?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The Median Bonus Pay Equality Score measures the degree to which men and women receive equal typical (median) bonus pay across the organization. It is based on the median bonus pay gap and is presented on a 0–100 scale, where a score of 100 indicates complete equality in median bonus pay, and 0 indicates maximum inequality. Using the median reduces the influence of extremely high or low bonus amounts, offering a more representative view of typical bonus fairness between genders.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Median Bonus Pay Equality Score+Wikirate Research Team"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  100 - Math.min(Math.abs(MedianGenderBonusPay), 100);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8674661",
          "name": "MedianGenderBonusPay"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Median_Bonus_Pay_Equality_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Median_Bonus_Pay_Equality_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403233,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Median Bonus Pay Equality Score+Wikirate Research Team",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Median_Bonus_Pay_Equality_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Median Bonus Pay Equality Score",
      "question": "To what extent is the typical bonus pay equal between men and women across the organization?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>The Median Bonus Pay Equality Score is based on the median bonus pay gap and is normalized onto a 0–10 scale, where a score of 10 represents complete equality in median bonus pay and 0 represents maximum inequality. Using the median reduces the influence of extreme bonus values and provides a more typical view of gender bonus fairness.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10556,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Bonus_Pay_Equality_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Median_Bonus_Pay_Equality_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403248,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Bonus Pay Equality Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Bonus_Pay_Equality_Score.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Bonus Pay Equality Score",
      "question": "To what extent is bonus pay equally distributed between men and women across the organization, considering both average and typical bonus amounts?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>The Bonus Pay Equality Score provides an overall measure of bonus pay fairness between men and women, combining the mean and median bonus pay equality scores into a single value. It is normalized to a 0–10 scale, where a score of 10 represents full equality in bonus pay and 0 represents maximum inequality. This score captures both the average and typical experience of bonus pay distribution.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~21403206",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~21403233",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10556,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Gender_Pay_Equity_Index.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Bonus_Pay_Equality_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403255,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Bonus Pay Participation Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Bonus_Pay_Participation_Score.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Bonus Pay Participation Score",
      "question": "To what extent do men and women have equal access to receiving bonus pay in the organization?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The Bonus Pay Participation Score measures the extent to which men and women have equal access to receiving bonus pay within the organization. It is based on the absolute difference between the percentage of men and women who receive bonuses, and is scored on a 0–100 scale, where a score of 100 represents perfect equality in bonus pay participation and 0 represents maximum inequality.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Bonus Pay Participation Score+Wikirate Research Team"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  100 - Math.abs(PercentageReceivingBonusMale - PercentageReceivingBonusFemale);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8674683",
          "name": "PercentageReceivingBonusFemale"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8674672",
          "name": "PercentageReceivingBonusMale"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Bonus_Pay_Participation_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Bonus_Pay_Participation_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403266,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Bonus Pay Participation Score+Wikirate Research Team",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Bonus_Pay_Participation_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Bonus Pay Participation Score",
      "question": "To what extent do men and women have equal access to receiving bonus pay in the organization?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>The Bonus Pay Participation Score measures gender equality in access to receiving bonus pay, normalized to a 0–10 scale. A score of 10 represents perfect equality between men’s and women’s participation in bonus schemes, while 0 indicates maximum inequality.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Gender_Pay_Equity_Index.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Bonus_Pay_Participation_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403273,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Lower Quartile Pay Representation Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Lower_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Lower Quartile Pay Representation Score",
      "question": "To what extent are men and women equally represented in the lower pay quartile?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This Lower Quartile Pay Representation Score measures the gender representation equality in the organization's lower pay quartile. It is based on the absolute difference between male and female representation, transformed into a score where higher values indicate greater balance and 0 represents maximum imbalance.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Lower Quartile Pay Representation Score+Wikirate Research Team"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  100 - Math.abs(PercentageLowerPayQuartileMale - PercentageLowerPayQuartileFemale);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8674705",
          "name": "PercentageLowerPayQuartileFemale"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8674694",
          "name": "PercentageLowerPayQuartileMale"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Lower_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Lower_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403284,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Lower Quartile Pay Representation Score+Wikirate Research Team",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Lower_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Lower Quartile Pay Representation Score",
      "question": "To what extent are men and women equally represented in the lower pay quartile?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p>This metric is based on the absolute difference between male and female representation percentages and normalized to a 0–10 scale, where a score of 10 indicates perfect balance and a score of 0 indicates maximum imbalance.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Quartile_Representation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Lower_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403291,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Lower Middle Quartile Pay Representation Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Lower_Middle_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Lower Middle Quartile Pay Representation Score",
      "question": "To what extent are men and women equally represented in the lower middle pay quartile?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This Lower Middle Quartile Representation score measures gender representation equality within the organization's lower middle pay quartile. It is based on the absolute difference between male and female representation and scored from 0 to 100, where 100 indicates perfect balance.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Lower Middle Quartile Pay Representation Score+Wikirate Research Team"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  100 - Math.abs(PercentageLowerMiddlePayMale - PercentageLowerMiddlePayFemale);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8674727",
          "name": "PercentageLowerMiddlePayFemale"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8674716",
          "name": "PercentageLowerMiddlePayMale"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Lower_Middle_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Lower_Middle_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403302,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Lower Middle Quartile Pay Representation Score+Wikirate Research Team",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Lower_Middle_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Lower Middle Quartile Pay Representation Score",
      "question": "To what extent are men and women equally represented in the lower middle pay quartile?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">This metric is based on the absolute difference between male and female representation percentages and normalized to a 0–10 scale, where a score of 10 indicates perfect balance and a score of 0 indicates maximum imbalance.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Quartile_Representation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Lower_Middle_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403309,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Upper Middle Quartile Pay Representation Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Upper_Middle_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Upper Middle Quartile Pay Representation Score",
      "question": "To what extent are men and women equally represented in the upper middle pay quartile?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The Upper Middle Quartile Pay Representation Score measures gender representation equality within the organization's upper middle pay quartile. It is based on the absolute difference between male and female representation and scored from 0 to 100, where 100 indicates perfect balance.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Upper Middle Quartile Pay Representation Score+Wikirate Research Team"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  100 - Math.abs(PercentageUpperMiddleQuartileMale - PercentageUpperMiddleQuartileFemale);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8674753",
          "name": "PercentageUpperMiddleQuartileFemale"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8674742",
          "name": "PercentageUpperMiddleQuartileMale"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Upper_Middle_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Upper_Middle_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403320,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Upper Middle Quartile Pay Representation Score+Wikirate Research Team",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Upper_Middle_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Upper Middle Quartile Pay Representation Score",
      "question": "To what extent are men and women equally represented in the lower middle pay quartile?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">This metric is based on the absolute difference between male and female representation percentages and normalized to a 0–10 scale, where a score of 10 indicates perfect balance and a score of 0 indicates maximum imbalance.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Quartile_Representation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Upper_Middle_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403327,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Top Quartile Pay Representation Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Top_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Top Quartile Pay Representation Score",
      "question": "To what extent are men and women equally represented in the top pay quartile?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The Top Quartile Pay Represantation Score measures gender representation equality within the organization's top pay quartile. It is based on the absolute difference between male and female representation and scored from 0 to 100, where 100 indicates perfect balance.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": "0-100",
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Top Quartile Pay Representation Score+Wikirate Research Team"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  100 - Math.abs(PercentageTopPayQuartileMale - PercentageTopPayQuartileFemale);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~8674775",
          "name": "PercentageTopPayQuartileFemale"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~8674764",
          "name": "PercentageTopPayQuartileMale"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Top_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Top_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403338,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Top Quartile Pay Representation Score+Wikirate Research Team",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Top_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Top Quartile Pay Representation Score",
      "question": "To what extent are men and women equally represented in the top pay quartile?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">This metric is based on the absolute difference between male and female representation percentages and normalized to a 0–10 scale, where a score of 10 indicates perfect balance and a score of 0 indicates maximum imbalance.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer / 10;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Quartile_Representation_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Top_Quartile_Pay_Representation_Score+Wikirate_Research_Team+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403345,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Quartile Representation Score",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Quartile_Representation_Score.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Quartile Representation Score",
      "question": "How equally are men and women represented across all pay quartiles in the organization?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>The Quartile Representation Score provides an overall assessment of gender representation equality across all pay quartiles - lower, lower middle, upper middle, and top. It is based on the absolute differences between male and female representation in each quartile and aggregates these into a single score on a 0-10 scale. A score of 10 indicates perfect gender balance across all quartiles, while a lower score reflects greater imbalances, especially in higher pay levels.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~21403284",
          "weight": 10
        },
        {
          "metric": "~21403302",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~21403320",
          "weight": 30
        },
        {
          "metric": "~21403338",
          "weight": 40
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10924,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Gender_Pay_Equity_Index.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Quartile_Representation_Score+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21403352,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Gender Pay Equity Index",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Gender_Pay_Equity_Index.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Gender Pay Equity Index",
      "question": "How does the organization perform in promoting gender pay equity across wages, bonuses, and leadership roles?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><em><strong>The Gender Pay Equity Index measures the gender pay fairness across earnings, bonus participation, and representation levels.</strong></em></p>\r\n<p>More specifically, it assesses an organization's performance in achieving gender fairness across multiple dimensions: hourly pay, bonus pay, access to bonuses, and representation at different pay levels. It combines the Hourly Pay Equality Score, Bonus Pay Equality Score, Bonus Pay Participation Score, and Quartile Representation Score into a single overall score. The index is presented on a 0 - 10 scale, where a higher score indicates stronger performance in promoting equitable pay and opportunities for men and women across the organization.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Workforce Diversity"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~21403187",
          "weight": 30
        },
        {
          "metric": "~21403248",
          "weight": 15
        },
        {
          "metric": "~21403266",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~21403345",
          "weight": 35
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 10555,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Gender_Pay_Equity_Index+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21456517,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Report discoverability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Report_discoverability.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Report discoverability",
      "question": "Where does the company make their non-financial report available?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><em>Why is this important?</em></p>\r\n<p>Transparency isn’t just about what a company discloses – it's also about how they disclose it. Making  reports easy to find and accessible to a wide range of stakeholders is a key part of demonstrating transparency around operations and impacts. <span></span></p>\r\n<p><em>What does good practice look like?</em></p>\r\n<p>Companies should:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong>Archive reports on their website</strong> using stable, version-specific URLs for each report, ensuring that older versions do not change over time or get overwritten. Place them in a section that is easy to find from the homepage and accessible to all stakeholders—not just investors.</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Submit their reports to national or international databases</span></strong><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"> that provide free bulk downloads and/or API access to enable big data analyses.</span></p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p>Use a search engine of your choice and look for: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>[company name] annual report</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>[company name] sustainability report</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>You are looking for a webpage or database entry with a link to the non-financial report (not the report itself!)</strong>. Once you found the place where the report is hosted, create a new Source on Wikirate using that webpage and cite that in your answer.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> When adding a new Source, the pdf-snapshot maker does not always capture webpages well. In those cases, go back to the webpage, right-click 'Print', make sure the option 'Print headers and footer' is selected, and 'Save as pdf'. Then add it to Wikirate as a pdf, and add the URL address to the description of the Source.<br><br>Select the answer option <strong>‘on request’</strong> if you need to fill out a form or send an email requesting access to the report (so you are not able to simply download it). <br><br>It is possible that the company makes their report available on their own website AND in a central database, in which case you select both answer options. <br><br>Examples of databases to check:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Annual Reports: <a href=\"https://www.annualreports.com/\">https://www.annualreports.com/</a></li>\r\n<li>XBRL filings: <a href=\"https://filings.xbrl.org/\">https://filings.xbrl.org/</a> </li>\r\n<li>EFRAG report repository: <a href=\"https://insights.efrag.org/reports\">https://insights.efrag.org/reports</a> </li>\r\n<li>EDGAR database: <a href=\"https://www.sec.gov/search-filings\">https://www.sec.gov/search-filings</a></li>\r\n<li>European Single Access Point (ESAP is due to go live in 2027)</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Own website",
        "Central database",
        "On request",
        "other",
        "Nowhere"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Report discoverability+Wikirate International e.V."
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 89,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 88,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Report_discoverability+Wikirate_International_e_V.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Report_discoverability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21456528,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Report format",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Report_format.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Report format",
      "question": "What format(s) does the company publish its non-financial report in? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;\"><em><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; color: #34343b; background-color: #ffffff; font-weight: 400; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">W</span>hy is this important?</em><br><br>All company disclosures must be <a href=\"/Glossary\">machine readable</a> to enable tracking of company progress and identify best practice <strong>across sectors</strong>. </p>\r\n<p><br><em>Context:</em></p>\r\n<p>While AI is improving and making it easier to extract data from PDF reports, this approach is not accurate enough to depend on and remains expensive to run. Rather companies need to make use of formats with digital tags that enable machine readability at low costs. XBRL is a great example of a machine readable format. <span></span></p>\r\n<p>Under the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), companies will soon be required to use XBRL tags in the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF) for sustainability data. Although still voluntary, companies can prepare for future requirements by applying it to current reporting. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Start by looking in the place where the company hosts its report. Check there if the company offers multiple formats in which you can download the report. </p>\r\n<p>If there is only one link/format, search through that document with keyword searches for the other format options. Most likely you will be looking through a pdf report searching for \"XBRL\".</p>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> Some companies are required to make their <strong>financial </strong>data available in the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF) with digital XBRL (or also referred to as iXBRL) tags. Make sure not to mistake such a reference to XBRL for the company also making its <strong>non-financial</strong> data available in XBRL. </p>\r\n<p>Companies might provide their report in multiple formats so make sure to check for all options and select as many answer options as apply.</p>\r\n<p>If you found the answer to this question by looking at the company's website, use that page as the Source you cite. If you found the answer by searching through their report, then that should be the Source you cite.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "PDF (text based)",
        "PDF (image only)",
        "Standalone XBRL file",
        "Inline XBRL (iXBRL / XHTML with XBRL tags)",
        "Web HTML page",
        "Spreadsheet",
        "No report available"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 89,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 88,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Readability_of_Report_Formats.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Report_format+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21456659,
      "name": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First+Cumulative Penalties for Competition Violations Since 2010",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_Competition_Violations_Since_2010.json",
      "designer": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First",
      "title": "Cumulative Penalties for Competition Violations Since 2010",
      "question": "What is the total amount the company has paid in penalties for competition-related violations since 2010?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; margin: 0.75rem 0px; font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; font-size: 1rem !important;\">Each entry in [[</span><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/|</span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Violation Tracker Global]] is tagged with one of more than 90 Offense Categories. They divide those categories into eight broader Offense Groups. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; margin: 0.75rem 0px; font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; text-decoration-line: underline; font-size: 1rem !important;\">The Competition-related offenses group include:</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; margin: 0.75rem 0px; font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\">agribusiness violation, anti-competitive practices, energy market violation, export control violation, foreign exchange market manipulation, fraud, interest rate benchmark manipulation, kickbacks and bribery, maritime violation, state aid violation, theft of trade secrets, trade violations</p>\r\n<p style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; margin: 0.75rem 0px; font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\">[[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/pages/offense-groups|Source]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-family: Inter, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;\">The [[</span><span style=\"font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\">https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org</span><span style=\"font-family: Inter, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;\">|Violation Tracker Global]], produced by the Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First, brings together enforcement data from more than 700 regulatory agencies in more than 50 countries on issues such as consumer protection, antitrust/competition, banking, investor protection, labor standards, environmental protection, data protection, bribery, and money laundering. The data primarily comes from what is disclosed on agency websites. [[</span><span style=\"font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\">https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/pages/user-guide</span><span style=\"font-family: Inter, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;\">|Learn more]].</span></p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 500,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_All_Regulatory_Violations_Since_2010.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_Competition_Violations_Since_2010+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21456670,
      "name": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First+Cumulative Penalties for Consumer Protection Violations Since 2010",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_Consumer_Protection_Violations_Since_2010.json",
      "designer": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First",
      "title": "Cumulative Penalties for Consumer Protection Violations Since 2010",
      "question": "What is the cumulative value of fines incurred due to consumer protection violations since 2010?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Each entry in [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/|Violation Tracker Global]] is tagged with one of more than 90 Offense Categories. They divide those categories into eight broader Offense Groups. </p>\r\n<p style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; margin: 0.75rem 0px; font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; text-decoration-line: underline; font-size: 1rem !important;\">The Consumer-protection-related offenses group include:</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; margin: 0.75rem 0px; font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\">consumer protection violation, discriminatory practices (non-employment), gambling industry violation, housing code violation, mortgage abuses, privacy violation, service quality violation, telecommunications violation, unfair commercial practices, utility service violation</p>\r\n<p>[[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/pages/offense-groups|Source]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org|Violation Tracker Global]], produced by the Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First, brings together enforcement data from more than 700 regulatory agencies in more than 50 countries on issues such as consumer protection, antitrust/competition, banking, investor protection, labor standards, environmental protection, data protection, bribery, and money laundering. The data primarily comes from what is disclosed on agency websites. [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/pages/user-guide|Learn more]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 500,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_All_Regulatory_Violations_Since_2010.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_Consumer_Protection_Violations_Since_2010+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21456681,
      "name": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First+Cumulative Penalties for Employment Violations Since 2010",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_Employment_Violations_Since_2010.json",
      "designer": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First",
      "title": "Cumulative Penalties for Employment Violations Since 2010",
      "question": "How much has the company paid in penalties for employment-related violations since 2010?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Each entry in [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/|Violation Tracker Global]] is tagged with one of more than 90 Offense Categories. They divide those categories into eight broader Offense Groups. </p>\r\n<p style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; margin: 0.75rem 0px; font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; text-decoration-line: underline; font-size: 1rem !important;\">The Employment-related offenses group includes:</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; margin: 0.75rem 0px; font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\">benefit plan administrator violation, employment discrimination, labor standards violation, pension plan violation, sexual harassment</p>\r\n<p>[[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/pages/offense-groups|Source]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org|Violation Tracker Global]], produced by the Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First, brings together enforcement data from more than 700 regulatory agencies in more than 50 countries on issues such as consumer protection, antitrust/competition, banking, investor protection, labor standards, environmental protection, data protection, bribery, and money laundering. The data primarily comes from what is disclosed on agency websites. [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/pages/user-guide|Learn more]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 500,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_All_Regulatory_Violations_Since_2010.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_Employment_Violations_Since_2010+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21456692,
      "name": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First+Cumulative Penalties for Environmental Violations Since 2010",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_Environmental_Violations_Since_2010.json",
      "designer": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First",
      "title": "Cumulative Penalties for Environmental Violations Since 2010",
      "question": "What is the total amount of fines the company has paid for environmental violations since 2010?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Each entry in [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/|Violation Tracker Global]] is tagged with one of more than 90 Offense Categories. They divide those categories into eight broader Offense Groups. </p>\r\n<p style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; margin: 0.75rem 0px; font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; text-decoration-line: underline; font-size: 1rem !important;\">The Environment-related offenses group includes:</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; margin: 0.75rem 0px; font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\">air pollution violation, asbestos violation, dam collapse, deforestation, drinking water violation, energy conservation violation, environmental violation, fuel economy violation, GMO violation, greenhouse gas violation, hazardous waste violation, illegal mining, land use violation, lead violation, licensing violation, mining environmental violation, mining violation, MTBE violation, oil or gas drilling violation, oil spill, PCB violation, pesticide violation, petroleum gas violation, PFAS violation, pipeline accident, pipeline safety violation, pipeline use violation, radiation violation, radioactive waste violation, solid waste violation, toxic gas leak, underground storage tank violation, waste violation, water pollution violation, water use violation, wildfire liability, wildlife violation</p>\r\n<p>[[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/pages/offense-groups|Source]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org|Violation Tracker Global]], produced by the Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First, brings together enforcement data from more than 700 regulatory agencies in more than 50 countries on issues such as consumer protection, antitrust/competition, banking, investor protection, labor standards, environmental protection, data protection, bribery, and money laundering. The data primarily comes from what is disclosed on agency websites. [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/pages/user-guide|Learn more]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 500,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_All_Regulatory_Violations_Since_2010.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_Environmental_Violations_Since_2010+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21456703,
      "name": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First+Cumulative Penalties for Financial Violations Since 2010",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_Financial_Violations_Since_2010.json",
      "designer": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First",
      "title": "Cumulative Penalties for Financial Violations Since 2010",
      "question": "What is the cumulative amount of financial violation penalties incurred by the company since 2010?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Each entry in [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/|Violation Tracker Global]] is tagged with one of more than 90 Offense Categories. They divide those categories into eight broader Offense Groups. </p>\r\n<p style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; margin: 0.75rem 0px; font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; text-decoration-line: underline; font-size: 1rem !important;\">The Financial offenses group includes:</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; margin: 0.75rem 0px; font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\">accounting fraud or deficiencies, anti-money-laundering deficiencies, banking violation, economic sanction violation, insider trading, insurance violation, internal controls deficiency, investor protection violation, money laundering, risk management failure, securities violation, tax violations, toxic securities abuses</p>\r\n<p>[[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/pages/offense-groups|Source]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org|Violation Tracker Global]], produced by the Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First, brings together enforcement data from more than 700 regulatory agencies in more than 50 countries on issues such as consumer protection, antitrust/competition, banking, investor protection, labor standards, environmental protection, data protection, bribery, and money laundering. The data primarily comes from what is disclosed on agency websites. [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/pages/user-guide|Learn more]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 500,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_All_Regulatory_Violations_Since_2010.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_Financial_Violations_Since_2010+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21456713,
      "name": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First+Cumulative Penalties for Government Contracting Violations Since 2010",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_Government_Contracting_Violations_Since_2010.json",
      "designer": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First",
      "title": "Cumulative Penalties for Government Contracting Violations Since 2010",
      "question": "What is the total in penalties paid by the company for violations related to government contracting since 2010?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Each entry in [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/|Violation Tracker Global]] is tagged with one of more than 90 Offense Categories. They divide those categories into eight broader Offense Groups. </p>\r\n<p style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; margin: 0.75rem 0px; font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; text-decoration-line: underline; font-size: 1rem !important;\">The Government-contracting-related offenses group includes:</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; margin: 0.75rem 0px; font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\">drilling leasing royalty violation, government contracting deficiencies, government contracting fraud, government procurement violation </p>\r\n<p>[[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/pages/offense-groups|Source]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org|Violation Tracker Global]], produced by the Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First, brings together enforcement data from more than 700 regulatory agencies in more than 50 countries on issues such as consumer protection, antitrust/competition, banking, investor protection, labor standards, environmental protection, data protection, bribery, and money laundering. The data primarily comes from what is disclosed on agency websites. [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/pages/user-guide|Learn more]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 500,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_All_Regulatory_Violations_Since_2010.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_Government_Contracting_Violations_Since_2010+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21456721,
      "name": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First+Cumulative Penalties for Healthcare Violations Since 2010",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_Healthcare_Violations_Since_2010.json",
      "designer": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First",
      "title": "Cumulative Penalties for Healthcare Violations Since 2010",
      "question": "What is the cumulative amount of fines the company has incurred for healthcare-related violations since 2010?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Each entry in [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/|Violation Tracker Global]] is tagged with one of more than 90 Offense Categories. They divide those categories into eight broader Offense Groups. </p>\r\n<p style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; margin: 0.75rem 0px; font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; text-decoration-line: underline; font-size: 1rem !important;\">The Healthcare-related offenses group include:</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; margin: 0.75rem 0px; font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\">care quality violation, controlled substances violation, healthcare provider violation, off-label or unapproved promotion of medical products</p>\r\n<p>[[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/pages/offense-groups|Source]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org|Violation Tracker Global]], produced by the Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First, brings together enforcement data from more than 700 regulatory agencies in more than 50 countries on issues such as consumer protection, antitrust/competition, banking, investor protection, labor standards, environmental protection, data protection, bribery, and money laundering. The data primarily comes from what is disclosed on agency websites. [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/pages/user-guide|Learn more]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 500,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_All_Regulatory_Violations_Since_2010.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_Healthcare_Violations_Since_2010+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21456729,
      "name": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First+Cumulative Penalties for Safety Violations Since 2010",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_Safety_Violations_Since_2010.json",
      "designer": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First",
      "title": "Cumulative Penalties for Safety Violations Since 2010",
      "question": "How much has the company paid in fines for safety-related violations since 2010?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Each entry in [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/|Violation Tracker Global]] is tagged with one of more than 90 Offense Categories. They divide those categories into eight broader Offense Groups. </p>\r\n<p style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; margin: 0.75rem 0px; font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; text-decoration-line: underline; font-size: 1rem !important;\">The Safety-related offenses group includes:</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"border: 0px solid currentcolor; box-sizing: border-box; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgba(59,130,246,0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; margin: 0.75rem 0px; font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\">aviation safety violation, childcare and educational services violation, drug or medical equipment safety violation, fire safety violation, food safety violation, motor vehicle safety violation, nuclear safety violation, product safety violation, railroad safety violation, utility safety violation, workplace safety or health violation</p>\r\n<p>[[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/pages/offense-groups|Source]]</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org|Violation Tracker Global]], produced by the Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First, brings together enforcement data from more than 700 regulatory agencies in more than 50 countries on issues such as consumer protection, antitrust/competition, banking, investor protection, labor standards, environmental protection, data protection, bribery, and money laundering. The data primarily comes from what is disclosed on agency websites. [[https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/pages/user-guide|Learn more]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 500,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 500,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_All_Regulatory_Violations_Since_2010.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_Safety_Violations_Since_2010+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21456744,
      "name": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First+Cumulative Penalties for All Regulatory Violations Since 2010",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_All_Regulatory_Violations_Since_2010.json",
      "designer": "Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First",
      "title": "Cumulative Penalties for All Regulatory Violations Since 2010",
      "question": "What is the total amount the company has paid in fines across all violation categories since 2010?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-family: Inter, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;\">The [[</span><span style=\"font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\">https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org</span><span style=\"font-family: Inter, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;\">|Violation Tracker Global]], produced by the Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First, brings together enforcement data from more than 700 regulatory agencies in more than 50 countries on issues such as consumer protection, antitrust/competition, banking, investor protection, labor standards, environmental protection, data protection, bribery, and money laundering. The data primarily comes from what is disclosed on agency websites. [[</span><span style=\"font-family: Inter, sans-serif;\">https://violationtrackerglobal.goodjobsfirst.org/pages/user-guide</span><span style=\"font-family: Inter, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;\">|Learn more]].</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "USD",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  competition_violations + consumer_protection_violations + employement_violations + environmental_violations + financial_violations + government_contracting_violations + healthcare_violations + safety_violations;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~21456659",
          "name": "competition_violations"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~21456670",
          "name": "consumer_protection_violations"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~21456681",
          "name": "employement_violations"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~21456692",
          "name": "environmental_violations"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~21456703",
          "name": "financial_violations"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~21456713",
          "name": "government_contracting_violations"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~21456721",
          "name": "healthcare_violations"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~21456729",
          "name": "safety_violations"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 508,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 508,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Corporate_Research_Project_of_Good_Jobs_First+Cumulative_Penalties_for_All_Regulatory_Violations_Since_2010+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473038,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Entity identification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Entity_identification.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Entity identification",
      "question": "Did the company identify which reporting entities are covered in their non-financial report using entity IDs, if so using which ID system(s)? ",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><em>Why is this important?</em><br><br>Clear disclosure of which entities are covered in a company’s report is essential for accurately tracking its operations and impacts.<br><br><em>Context:</em></p>\r\n<p>When we think of a company, we often think of it as one entity.  In reality, however, companies are made up of many entities – sometimes hundreds. Different types of disclosed data may relate to different entities of the same company. So depending on the topic, different entities might be relevant for you. Additionally, different entities may fall under different jurisdictions and legal systems. </p>\r\n<p><em>Why is just a company name not enough?</em></p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Companies may be known by various names — legal names, brand names, or trademarks — but these are often not unique, especially at a global scale. A unique ID is therefore key in making sure data extracted from a Source is attributed to the correct entity.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>You will likely find this information at the beginning or at the end of the report.</p>\r\n<p>Search the document using keywords such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.2;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">LEI</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.2;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">LEI)</span></li>\r\n<li style=\"line-height: 1.2;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; text-wrap-mode: wrap;\">LEI:</span></li>\r\n<li>no.</li>\r\n<li>ID</li>\r\n<li>Registration</li>\r\n<li>Tax ID</li>\r\n<li>VAT ID</li>\r\n<li>Chamber of Commerce</li>\r\n<li>Add the IDs you found in the comments together with the page number where you found it/them.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Companies might provide several unique IDs for their entities so make sure to check for all options and select as many answer options as apply.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Company Registration Number/ID",
        "Legal Entity Identifier (LEI)",
        "Tax ID",
        "International Securities Identification Number (ISIN)",
        "OpenCorporates ID",
        "SEC Central Index Key",
        "Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Entity identification+Wikirate International e.V."
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 88,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 88,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Entity_identification+Wikirate_International_e_V.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Entity_identification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473051,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Reporting period specified",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_period_specified.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Reporting period specified",
      "question": "Did the company specify which timeframe the data in their non-financial report refers to? (NOT to be confused with publication date)",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span><em>Why is this important?</em><br><br>To ensure the reliability of ESG data insights, it is essential to know the timeframe the data in a report covers. <br><br><em>Context:</em><br><br>Without this context, it is impossible to extract the information and associate it with the correct year, making company comparisons and analyses over time unreliable. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Do not confuse the 'reporting period' with the publication date or the year that might be mentioned in the name of the report. These can differ at times. For example, a report might cover the companies financial year 2024 but because they published it early 2025 they could call it their '2025 Annual Report'.</p>\r\n<p>The reporting period of a non-financial report is usually the same timeframe as a company's financial year, so look for details specifying from when to when their financial year runs. This can be the same as a calendar year, but does not have to be. </p>\r\n<p>Search the document using keywords:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Financial year</li>\r\n<li>FY</li>\r\n<li>Reporting period</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span>You will likely find this information at the beginning or at the end of the report. Possibly also in an auditor's report (if included). </span></p>\r\n<p>Add in the comments what the reporting period is (e.g. 1 January - 31 December 2024) and the page number where you found that information.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Reporting period specified+Wikirate International e.V."
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 88,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 88,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_period_specified+Wikirate_International_e_V.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_period_specified+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473060,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Report structure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Report_structure.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Report structure",
      "question": "Does the company's CSRD report follow the predefined ESRS structure?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Machine readability</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Go to the content page of the report and check if the Sustainability Statement structured in 4 parts, following this order:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li><strong>general</strong> information</li>\r\n<li><strong>environmental</strong> information</li>\r\n<li><strong>social</strong> information</li>\r\n<li><strong>governance</strong> information</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>If the report does not follow this exact structure, note in the comments what structure is.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Report_structure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473071,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Integrated indicator codes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Integrated_indicator_codes.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Integrated indicator codes",
      "question": "Did the company integrate indicator codes in its report to help identify which disclosure requirements it has reported on?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><em>Why is this important?</em><br><br>Reporting standards help standardize non-financial disclosures. By integrating indicator codes in their reports, companies signal to readers which methodology was used to collect, analyze and disclose the data, avoiding the risk of misinterpretation. <br><br><em>Context:</em><span></span></p>\r\n<p>Although an index is a helpful tool for readers to identify and locate relevant data, best practice is to place indicator codes next to corresponding disclosures. This not only helps the human audience quickly identify key information, but also improves machine readability through the use of these metadata tags.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>An index is typically found toward the end of a report, possibly in an appendix.</p>\r\n<p>Use keyword searches to look for indicator codes. </p>\r\n<p>Different reporting frameworks use different codes so make sure to check which framework the company uses and which codes are part of that framework. For example, the CSRD's ESRS will use codes like E1-2 or S1-14, whilst GRI has codes like GRI 305-1-a.</p>\r\n<p>Select the answer option ‘Alongside disclosure’ if the indicators are listed in line with the relevant text OR on the same page. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Note: </strong>High-level codes in titles of sections (for instance “E1 Climate Change” for an CSRD aligned report) is NOT sufficient to qualify for ‘alongside disclosures' as it is too high-level for it to function as a consistent system that helps identify specific disclosures.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> If an index includes chapter references that is not sufficient, but if it includes direct links to the sections of the report where the indicator in question is disclosed that is sufficient.</p>\r\n<p>Companies might be referencing indicator codes on the page AND in an index so make sure to check for both and select as many answer options as apply.</p>\r\n<p>In the comments add the page number of the index or an example page where a reviewer could see the indicator codes are integrated alongside disclosures.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Alongside disclosures (in line or on the same page)",
        "Index with page references",
        "Other",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Integrated indicator codes+Wikirate Research Team"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 88,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 88,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Integrated_indicator_codes+Wikirate_Research_Team.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Integrated_indicator_codes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473080,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Data license explicit",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Data_license_explicit.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Data license explicit",
      "question": "Did the company make explicit which data license applies to the data it has published in its non-financial report?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span><em>Why is this important?</em><br><br>A data license clearly defines if and how the information in a report can be reused. While non-financial disclosures are publicly available, this does not automatically grant legal permission for reuse. To avoid confusion and legal disputes, companies should explicitly state the data license in their report.<br><br><em>Context:</em><br><br>A data license is critical for giving legal clarity, enabling reuse and showing company transparency:<br><br>1. <strong>Legal clarity</strong> - States the rights and responsibilities around the data<br>2. <strong>Enables reuse</strong> - Allows others to analyze, combine, or build upon the data<br>3. <strong>Supports transparency</strong> – Shows a company is genuinely committed to open and accountable reporting. <br><br>In short, a data license determines if the data is something others can legally use in their work. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To determine if the company explicitly states what data license applies to their disclosure, use keyword searches such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>license</li>\r\n<li>terms of use</li>\r\n<li>copyright</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>If a license is specified add the type of license in the comments, including the page number where you found the information.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Data license explicit+Wikirate International e.V."
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 88,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 88,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Data_license_explicit+Wikirate_International_e_V.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Data_license_explicit+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473089,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Direct links to referenced documents",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Direct_links_to_referenced_documents.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Direct links to referenced documents",
      "question": "Does the company provide direct links to the policies or documents that it references in their non-financial report?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><em>Why is this important?</em><br><br>To prevent confusion or misinterpretation, companies should include direct links to all documents they reference in their disclosures.<br><br><em>Context:</em><br><br>Companies often refer to policies or codes of conduct within their non-financial reports that outline their approach and commitment to social and environmental issues. These documents often contain essential information and should be easily accessible, via direct links, to provide a complete and accurate understanding of the company’s performance.</p>\r\n<p><span></span></p>\r\n<p>This accessibility best practice saves time and guarantees data accuracy: viewers do not need to conduct additional document searches and know they are viewing the correct version. Furthermore, providing direct links enables large scale analysis via machine-processing, allowing researchers to assess company impacts across entire sectors – not just among a top 100 or 1000.</p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Simply by searching for commonly reference documents you will be able to determine if the company provides a direct link to them. </p>\r\n<p>Use keyword searches, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>policy</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>code of conduct</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>If the search returns too many hits, try adding additional details like 'human rights policy' or 'supplier code of conduct'.</p>\r\n<p>When finding direct links specify in the comments what document they are referencing and on what page the direct link can be found.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> Two or three direct links to referenced documents is sufficient for the ‘Yes’ answer (establishing a systematic approach). You do not need to check if all referenced documents come with direct links.</p>\r\n<p><span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;\">Note: </span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;\">Direct links to other sections within the same report are NOT considered sufficient for a 'Yes’ answer.</span></span></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Direct links to referenced documents+Wikirate International e.V."
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 88,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 88,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Direct_links_to_referenced_documents+Wikirate_International_e_V.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Direct_links_to_referenced_documents+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473098,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Archive of referenced documents",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Archive_of_referenced_documents.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Archive of referenced documents",
      "question": "Does the company archive the policies or other external documents it refers to in its non-financial report?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><em>Why is this important?</em><br><br>Archiving disclosures is essential for enabling accurate assessments over time. </p>\r\n<p><em>Context:</em></p>\r\n<p>For example, if a company references a Human Rights policy in its annual report, but later removes it from their website or overrides the url with a newer version, researchers' assessments would not be able to accurately reflect a company’s past performance. </p>\r\n<p><span></span></p>\r\n<p>In other words, archiving disclosures improves data quality and enables companies to demonstrate progress over time.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This question most likely requires you to add a new Source. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Note:</span> When adding a new Source, the pdf-snapshot maker does not always capture webpages well. In those cases, go back to the webpage, right-click 'Print', make sure the option 'Print headers and footer' is selected, and 'Save as pdf'. Then add it to Wikirate as a pdf, and add the URL address to the description of the Source.</p>\r\n<p>Use a search engine of your choice and look for:</p>\r\n<p>[company name] [commonly referenced document] </p>\r\n<p>For example: Solar A/S human rights policy</p>\r\n<p><strong>Note: </strong>Make sure to look for a page on the company website that has an archive of different documents and reports, not a direct link to the document you included in your search terms. </p>\r\n<p>If you find such an archive, that is the page you now use to create a new Source on Wikirate and which you will cite for your answer.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>Make sure to check if it is an archive including historic copies of these documents or whether it is just a library of current policies, codes and other documents.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Archive with current and historic documents",
        "Library with current documents",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Archive of referenced documents+Wikirate International e.V."
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 88,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 88,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Archive_of_referenced_documents+Wikirate_International_e_V.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Archive_of_referenced_documents+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473107,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Assurance provider",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Assurance_provider.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Assurance provider",
      "question": "Which organization has provided assurance over the company's CSRD report?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Tracking which organizations are providing the assurance on which data and reports enable an accountability loop on the assurance providers. It is the jumping off point for research into the quality of assurance and potential conflicts of interest, which goes to the heart of understanding how reliable the data is.  </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Typically the annual report will include an 'auditor's report' which will include their findings and a statement on the level of assurance they provide. Either at the start or end of this report you will find the name of the independent auditor. </p>\r\n<p>For this indicator you record the name of the auditing <strong>organization</strong> NOT the individual auditors who conducted the audit. </p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Assurance_provider+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473117,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Level of assurance",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Level_of_assurance.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Level of assurance",
      "question": "Which level of assurance was given to the company's non-financial data?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><em>Why is it important?</em></p>\r\n<p>Assurance – an independent assessment of a company’s reported information – is essential for increasing credibility, accuracy and trustworthiness of that information for investors and other stakeholders.</p>\r\n<p><em>Context</em></p>\r\n<p>While assurance is standard for financial data, it is a new requirement for  non-financial disclosures. Under EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), assurance has been introduced with the goal to boost data reliability. The regulation currently allows for two levels of assurance: <strong>limited</strong> and <strong>reasonable</strong>.</p>\r\n<p>In the audit report, the auditor provides a conclusion stating whether the company’s report has obtained \"limited\" or \"reasonable” assurance that the reported information is free from material misstatement. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Limited assurance </strong>– also known as  moderate assurance – offers a lower level of confidence compared to reasonable (or full) assurance. This is due to its narrower scope, meaning:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>fewer tests</li>\r\n<li>smaller sample size of data examined</li>\r\n<li>practitioner mainly performs analytical procedures, inquiries, and reviews rather than detailed testing of the reported data</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>The goal is to understand the processes used to compile the information and to identify areas where material misstatements are likely to occur, rather than confirm the complete accuracy of the data. </p>\r\n<p><strong>Reasonable assurance</strong> refers to a higher level of assurance. Its goal is to provide stakeholders with confidence that the reported information is free from material misstatement or error.</p>\r\n<p>It involves comprehensive procedures, including:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Detailed testing of transactions and balances</li>\r\n<li>Gathering sufficient and appropriate evidence</li>\r\n<li>Performing substantive tests, such as vouching and tracing</li>\r\n<li>Conducting internal control assessments and inquiries with management</li>\r\n<li>Analytical reviews</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Despite its higher level of assurance, reasonable assurance is <strong>not absolute</strong>. There is always a risk that material misstatements may not be detected due to factors such as fraud, error, or limitations in the audit process. Auditors rely on sampling, judgment, and reasonable evidence, but this does not guarantee the complete accuracy of the financial or non-financial reports.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>If the non-financial data has been assured, the report typically includes an 'auditor's report' which will include their findings and a statement on the level of assurance they provide. If present, you will likely find the auditor's report towards the end of the document. </p>\r\n<p>Keyword searches include:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>limited assurance</li>\r\n<li>reasonable assurance</li>\r\n<li>auditor's report</li>\r\n<li>assurance report</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> In some cases the auditor has provided limited assurance on the bulk of the reported data AND reasonable assurance on a specific number of data points. If that is the case, select both answer options.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> Make sure to check that the reference you found to the level of assurance pertains to the sustainability data and NOT the financial data. If the non-financial data has been audited this will be a separate audit from the financial data, which means there will be two different audit reports, and so different levels of assurance might be given.</p>\r\n<p>Add in the comments the page number where you found the relevant information AND what level of assurance has been provided.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Limited assurance",
        "Reasonable assurance",
        "No assurance given"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 88,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 2,
      "companies": 88,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Level_of_assurance+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473128,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Number of material subtopics identified",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Number_of_material_subtopics_identified.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Number of material subtopics identified",
      "question": "How many material subtopics did the company identify in its ESRS double materiality assessment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Getting an impression of the quantity of material subtopics that the company has identified is a first basis comparison. It will help us understand if companies within the same sector are coming to similar or very different materiality conclusions. </p>\r\n<p>By providing a list of which material subtopics were identified in the comments, we will then be able to dig deeper and establish more detailed trends in the outcomes of the companies materiality assessments.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Using keyword search, identify the section of the report that outlines the double materiality assessment. Here it will include an overview of the identified material impacts, risks and opportunities (IROs). The company should disclose which ESRS subtopics are material to them. Often you will find them in a list or table format.</p>\r\n<p>Count the number of subtopics they have identified as material, and copy paste them (at the very least their codes) into the comments, also including the page number(s) of where you found this information.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "subtopics",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Number_of_material_subtopics_identified+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473139,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Discloses immaterial topical ESRS standards",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Discloses_immaterial_topical_ESRS_standards.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Discloses immaterial topical ESRS standards",
      "question": "Did the company disclose which topical ESRS standards it identified as not material through its double materiality assessment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>Search the document for an overview of topical ESRS standards that the company has identified as immaterial, using keywords:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>immaterial</li>\r\n<li>not material</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>If such an overview is provided, include the page number(s) in the comments.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Discloses_immaterial_topical_ESRS_standards+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473150,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+CSRD: Modern slavery incidents disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+CSRD_Modern_slavery_incidents_disclosure.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "CSRD: Modern slavery incidents disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose any cases of forced labour cases identified in its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Under CSRD reporting requirements, companies might disclose forced labour incidents identified in their supply chains. They are not explicitly required to disclose this information. </p>\r\n<p>Tracking companies' disclosures of such cases enables us to gain insights into their level of transparency. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The answer for this metric is likely to appear in disclosures under ESRS S2 in CSRD reports. </p>\r\n<p>If the company discloses at least one case of violation related to forced labour, select \"Yes\". If not, select \"No\". </p>\r\n<p>‘Incident’ (violations, non-compliances) is defined as a case study or description of any case of violation of the company policies or local laws involving an individual or group of individuals.</p>\r\n<p>Companies can identify different types of violations, ranging from modern slavery cases to other types of incidents, such as health and safety or payment of recruitment fees. For this metric, we will focus on cases that <strong>the company recognizes as a case of modern slavery, forced labour, bonded labour, or child labour. </strong></p>\r\n<p>Please note, the incident must refer to a specific example, not a general description of risk.</p>\r\n<p>If the company identifies modern slavery as not material in its operations and supply chain, please select \"No\" (not Unknown).</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+CSRD_Modern_slavery_incidents_disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473163,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+CSRD: Workers in supply chains",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+CSRD_Workers_in_supply_chains.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "CSRD: Workers in supply chains",
      "question": "Does the company disclose any quantitative data about workers beyond their direct suppliers (beyond tier 1)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>If the conditions of materiality are met under CSRD reporting requirements, companies must report on workers in their value chain, which includes workers beyond direct suppliers.</p>\r\n<p>Capturing whether companies disclose information about workers in their entire value chain allows us to assess their level of transparency and the status of workers' rights in the value chain. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The answer to this metric is likely to be found under <span>ESRS </span><span>S2 - Workers in the value chain. </span></p>\r\n<p><span>If the company discloses quantitative indicators that provide insights into the status of workers' rights and working conditions in the company's value chain </span>(DR S2-7)<span>, </span>select \"Yes\". For example: </p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>n<span>umber </span><span>of </span><span>workers </span><span>in </span><span>the </span><span>value </span><span>chain </span><span>covered </span><span>by </span><span>collective </span><span>bargaining</span></li>\r\n<li><span>n</span><span>umber </span><span>of </span><span>labor </span><span>rights </span><span>incidents, </span><span>and </span><span>how</span> they were addressed </li>\r\n<li><span>remediation </span><span>of v</span><span>iolations</span></li>\r\n<li><span>health and safety data</span></li>\r\n<li><span>training on labor rights </span></li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>If the report contains no information, select \"No\". </p>\r\n<p>Please use the comment section to indicate which indicators and values are presented in the report.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+CSRD_Workers_in_supply_chains+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473176,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+CSRD: Living Wages in value chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+CSRD_Living_Wages_in_value_chain.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "CSRD: Living Wages in value chain",
      "question": "Does the company provide a commitment on, or detail their action to ensure living wages throughout their supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The European Sustainability Reporting Standards do not require the disclosure of a dedicated “adequate wage” indicator for workers in the value chain (unlike for the company's workforce). However, if low or unfair wages in the value chain are material to the company’s operations, then the company must report on it, most likely under DR S2-5 and S2-6.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"font-size: 16px; box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 1.38; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 0pt 0pt 12pt;\"><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;\">T</span>o meet this metric, companies must disclose that they have made commitments, or taken action, to <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">tackle low wages in their supply chains</span>.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px; box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;\">This can include:</p>\r\n<ul style=\"font-size: 16px; box-sizing: border-box; padding-left: 2rem; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;\">\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">Commitment to paying living wage or fair wages</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">Action plan to pay living wage</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">Number of suppliers where living wage is paid</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box;\">% of suppliers that have committed to pay living wage</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px; box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;\">If the company discloses that it has made these commitments, or taken these actions to ensure that supply chain workers are paid a fair or living wage, please indicate <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">“Yes”</span>, and provide details.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px; box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;\">Mention of minimum wage is <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">not</span> sufficient.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px; box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;\">If no action exists or is described in the statement, please select <span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;\">“No”</span>.</p>\r\n<p style=\"font-size: 16px; box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;\">If yes, in your comment please add the relevant section of the statement, including what type of information on supply chain workers’ wages is disclosed.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+CSRD_Living_Wages_in_value_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473202,
      "name": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards+ESRS E5-4: Resource Inflows",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_E5_4_Resource_Inflows.json",
      "designer": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards",
      "title": "ESRS E5-4: Resource Inflows",
      "question": "Which percentage of reused or recycled input materials does the company disclose?\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Circular economy practices are key to saving resources and protecting the environment from exploitation. The European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) require companies to publish the percentage of input materials used in production that are either recycled or reused. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Provide the figure (in percentage) of reused or recycled input materials used by the company as found in the report.</p>\r\n<p>Please select \"Unknown\" if the figure is not disclosed. </p>\r\n<p>In your comment, indicate whether the report provides a breakdown of recycled input materials (e.g. steel, minerals).</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Circular Economy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Recycled Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Material Recovery & Reuse"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 301 - Materials",
        "GRI Standards+301-2 Recycled input materials used",
        "GRI Standards+301-2-a Percentage of recycled input materials used to manufacture primary products and services",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E5 - Resource Use & Circular Economy",
        "ESRS Standards+E5.4 - Resource Inflows"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_E5_4_Resource_Inflows+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473216,
      "name": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards+ESRS E1-6: Total GHG emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_E1_6_Total_GHG_emissions.json",
      "designer": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards",
      "title": "ESRS E1-6: Total GHG emissions",
      "question": "What is the total gross greenhouse gas emissions (location-based) reported by the company?\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The <span style=\"background-color: #ffffff; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;\">European Sustainability Reporting Standards require companies to report on the GHG emissions. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies must report their GHG emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂e). If the unit used by the company does not correspond to tCO₂e, convert the value, outlining the methodology used in your comments. Please outline in the comments any calculations you’ve had to use to arrive at the answer.</p>\r\n<p>Do not include punctuation when inputting numbers. </p>\r\n<p>Please select \"Unknown\" if the data is not disclosed in the report. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tCO₂e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 305 - Emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-3 Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E1 - Climate Change",
        "ESRS Standards+E1.8 - Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 GHG emissions"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_E1_6_Total_GHG_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473238,
      "name": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards+ESRS E1-6: Scope 1 emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_E1_6_Scope_1_emissions.json",
      "designer": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards",
      "title": "ESRS E1-6: Scope 1 emissions",
      "question": "What is the total gross Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions reported by the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">The </span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">European Sustainability Reporting Standards require companies to report on the GHG emissions. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies must report their GHG emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂e). If the unit used by the company does not correspond to tCO₂e, convert the value, outlining the methodology used in your comments. Please outline in the comments any calculations you’ve had to use to arrive at the answer.</p>\r\n<p>Do not include punctuation when inputting numbers. </p>\r\n<p>Please select \"Unknown\" if the data is not disclosed in the report. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tCO₂e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 305 - Emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-1-a Gross direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E1 - Climate Change",
        "ESRS Standards+E1.8 - Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 GHG emissions"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Scope_1_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_E1_6_Scope_1_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473251,
      "name": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards+ESRS E1-6: Location-based Scope 2 emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_E1_6_Location_based_Scope_2_emissions.json",
      "designer": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards",
      "title": "ESRS E1-6: Location-based Scope 2 emissions",
      "question": "What is the total gross location-based Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions reported by the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">The </span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">European Sustainability Reporting Standards require companies to report on the GHG emissions. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies must report their GHG emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂e). If the unit used by the company does not correspond to tCO₂e, convert the value, outlining the methodology used in your comments. Please outline in the comments any calculations you’ve had to use to arrive at the answer.</p>\r\n<p>Do not include punctuation when inputting numbers. </p>\r\n<p>Please select \"Unknown\" if the data is not disclosed in the report. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tCO₂e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 305 - Emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-2-a Gross location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E1 - Climate Change",
        "ESRS Standards+E1.8 - Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 GHG emissions"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_E1_6_Location_based_Scope_2_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473264,
      "name": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards+ESRS E1-6: Market-based Scope 2 emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_E1_6_Market_based_Scope_2_emissions.json",
      "designer": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards",
      "title": "ESRS E1-6: Market-based Scope 2 emissions",
      "question": "What is the total gross market-based Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions reported by the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">The </span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">European Sustainability Reporting Standards require companies to report on the GHG emissions. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies must report their GHG emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂e). If the unit used by the company does not correspond to tCO₂e, convert the value, outlining the methodology used in your comments. Please outline in the comments any calculations you’ve had to use to arrive at the answer.</p>\r\n<p>Do not include punctuation when inputting numbers. </p>\r\n<p>Please select \"Unknown\" if the data is not disclosed in the report. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tCO₂e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 305 - Emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-2-b Applicability and total amount of gross market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E1 - Climate Change",
        "ESRS Standards+E1.8 - Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 GHG emissions"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_E1_6_Market_based_Scope_2_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473277,
      "name": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards+ESRS E1-6: Scope 3 emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_E1_6_Scope_3_emissions.json",
      "designer": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards",
      "title": "ESRS E1-6: Scope 3 emissions",
      "question": "What is the total gross Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions reported by the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">The </span><span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">European Sustainability Reporting Standards require companies to report on the GHG emissions. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Companies must report their GHG emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂e). If the unit used by the company does not correspond to tCO₂e, convert the value, outlining the methodology used in your comments. Please outline in the comments any calculations you’ve had to use to arrive at the answer.</p>\r\n<p>Do not include punctuation when inputting numbers. </p>\r\n<p>Please select \"Unknown\" if the data is not disclosed in the report. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "tCO₂e",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 305 - Emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-3 Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions",
        "GRI Standards+305-3-a Gross other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E1 - Climate Change",
        "ESRS Standards+E1.8 - Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 GHG emissions"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Scope_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_E1_6_Scope_3_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473290,
      "name": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards+ESRS E4-5: sites near or in key biodiversity areas",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_E4_5_sites_near_or_in_key_biodiversity_areas.json",
      "designer": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards",
      "title": "ESRS E4-5: sites near or in key biodiversity areas",
      "question": "How many sites does the company own, lease or manage in or near protected areas or key biodiversity areas that it is negatively affecting?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Under the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), companies must disclose the number and area (in hectares) of sites owned, leased or managed in or near these protected areas or key biodiversity areas.</p>\r\n<table cellpadding=\"0\" border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" style=\"font-size: 1em;\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td> </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>If the company reports owning, leasing or managing sites near protected or key biodiversity areas that it is negatively affecting, input the number of sites disclosed in the report. </p>\r\n<p>If the company discloses the number of sites near or in <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">protected or key biodiversity areas but fails to share information about the number of sites that were found to impact biodiversity negatively, select \"Unknown\". Make sure to copy-paste relevant sections of the report to highlight the lack of information disclosed by the company. </span></p>\r\n<p>If the issue is considered \"not material\" by the company, please add it to your comment and copy the relevant excerpt and page number. </p>\r\n<p>Please select \"Unknown\" if the data is not disclosed in the report. </p>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "number of sites",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Biodiversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Land Use"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 304 - Biodiversity 2016",
        "GRI Standards+304-1 Operational sites owned, leased, managed in, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas",
        "GRI Standards+304-1-a Operational sites owned, leased, managed in, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E4 - Biodiversity and Ecosystems",
        "ESRS Standards+E4.5 - Metrics related to biodiversity and ecosystems change"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_E4_5_sites_near_or_in_key_biodiversity_areas+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473303,
      "name": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards+ESRS E3-4: Water consumption in areas at water risk",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_E3_4_Water_consumption_in_areas_at_water_risk.json",
      "designer": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards",
      "title": "ESRS E3-4: Water consumption in areas at water risk",
      "question": "What is the total water consumption in areas at water risk, including areas of high-water stress, in the company's operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Under the European Sustainability Reporting Standards, companies must report the total water consumption in m3 in areas at water risk, including areas of high-water stress in their own operations. </p>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">If the company reports the total water consumption in areas at water risk, including areas <span style=\"font-family: sans-serif;\">of high water-stress, input the value in m3. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\"><span style=\"font-family: sans-serif;\">If the issue is considered \"not material\" by the company, please add it to your comment and copy the relevant excerpt and page number. </span></p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Please select \"Unknown\" if the data is not disclosed in the report. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "m3",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Water Usage"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 303 - Water and Effluents",
        "GRI Standards+303-5 Water consumption",
        "GRI Standards+303-5-b Water consumption from all areas with water stress",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+E3 - Water",
        "ESRS Standards+E3.4 - Water metrics"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_E3_4_Water_consumption_in_areas_at_water_risk+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473315,
      "name": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards+ESRS G1-5: Political contributions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_G1_5_Political_contributions.json",
      "designer": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards",
      "title": "ESRS G1-5: Political contributions",
      "question": "What is the total financial and in-kind political contributions made by the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Under the European Sustainability Reporting Standards, companies must provide information on the activities and commitments related to exerting their political influence, including lobbying activities related to their material impacts, risks, and opportunities.</p>\r\n<p>The data collected under this metric corresponds to the definition of direct political contributions, as defined by EFRAG in Annex of Disclosure Requirements for ESRS G1-5.</p>\r\n<p>AR 9. For purposes of this Standard ‘political contribution’ means financial or in-kind support provided directly to political parties, their elected representatives or persons seeking political office. Financial contributions can include donations, loans, sponsorships, advance payments for services, or the purchase of tickets for fundraising events and other similar practices. In-kind contributions can include advertising, use of facilities, design and printing, donation of equipment, provision of board membership, employment or consultancy work for elected politicians or candidates for office. </p>\r\n<table cellpadding=\"0\" border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" style=\"font-size: 1em;\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td> </td>\r\n<td> </td>\r\n<td> </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">If the company reports the financial and/or in-kind contributions it made to political parties, elected representatives, or candidates, input the value in euros. </p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">The amount spent on lobbying, trade associations and think tanks is collected through another metric. </p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Please select \"Unknown\" if the data is not disclosed in the report. </p>",
      "value_type": "Money",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Euros",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "GRI Standards+GRI 415 - Public Policy",
        "GRI Standards+415-1 Political contributions",
        "GRI Standards+415-1-a Political contributions by country, recipient, and total monetary value",
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+G1 - Business Conduct",
        "ESRS Standards+G1.5 - Metrics related to political influence and lobbying activities"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_G1_5_Political_contributions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21473328,
      "name": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards+ESRS G1-5: Lobbying expenses",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_G1_5_Lobbying_expenses.json",
      "designer": "European Sustainability Reporting Standards",
      "title": "ESRS G1-5: Lobbying expenses",
      "question": "What is the total amount the company has reported for internal and external lobbying expenses?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Under the European Sustainability Reporting Standards, companies must provide information on the activities and commitments related to exerting their political influence, including lobbying activities related to their material impacts, risks, and opportunities.</p>\r\n<table cellpadding=\"0\" border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" style=\"caption-side: bottom; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 1em; background-color: #ffffff;\">\r\n<tbody style=\"box-sizing: border-box; border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;\">\r\n<tr style=\"box-sizing: border-box; border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;\">\r\n<td style=\"box-sizing: border-box; border: 0px solid inherit;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"box-sizing: border-box; border: 0px solid inherit;\"> </td>\r\n<td style=\"box-sizing: border-box; border: 0px solid inherit;\"> </td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">This metric combines the expenses disclosed for indirect political contributions and lobbying activities, as defined by EFRAG in the Disclosure requirements G1-5 and Defined Terms. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Indirect political contributions</span>: </p>\r\n<p>AR 10, G1-5. ‘Indirect political contribution’ refers to those political contributions made through an intermediary organisation such as a lobbyist or charity, or support given to an organisation such as a think tank or trade association linked to or supporting particular political parties or causes. </p>\r\n<p>Lobbying activities, as defined in the Defined Terms.</p>\r\n<p>Activities carried out with the objective of influencing the formulation or implementation of policy or legislation, or the decision-making processes of governments, governmental institutions, regulators, European Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies or standard setters. Such activities include (non-exhaustive list):</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>organising or participating in meetings, conferences, events;</li>\r\n<li>contributing to/participating in public consultations, hearings or other similar initiatives;</li>\r\n<li>organising communication campaigns, platforms, networks, grassroots initiatives;</li>\r\n<li>preparing/commissioning policy and position papers, opinion polls, surveys, open letters, research work as per the activities covered by transparency register rules.</li>\r\n</ol>",
      "methodology": "<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">If the company reports the amount spent on:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Internal and external lobbying</li>\r\n<li style=\"box-sizing: border-box; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Amount paid to industry/trade associations, think tanks, NGOs, or other organizations that are NOT political parties</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Combine the values (if reported separately) and input the value in euros. </p>\r\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1rem; color: #34343b; font-family: 'IBM Plex Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Please select \"Unknown\" if the data is not disclosed in the report. </p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Annual Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "Euros",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [
        "ESRS Standards",
        "ESRS Standards+G1 - Business Conduct",
        "ESRS Standards+G1.5 - Metrics related to political influence and lobbying activities"
      ],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 48,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 48,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/European_Sustainability_Reporting_Standards+ESRS_G1_5_Lobbying_expenses+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21476514,
      "name": "Open Terms Archive+Community Guidelines Word Count",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Community_Guidelines_Word_Count.json",
      "designer": "Open Terms Archive",
      "title": "Community Guidelines Word Count",
      "question": "How long is the Community Guidelines document in number of words (average number for all the different versions within the year)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The Community Guidelines are tracked continuously with Open Terms Archive. The number of words in the collected documents is calculated by using spaces, new lines and tabulations as separators. CJK symbols are counted as words, and punctuation is taken into account. More information can be found on the <a href=\"https://github.com/ngryman/reading-time/\"><code>reading-time</code></a> library. This value is calculated and averaged over all versions published in the year.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Community Guidelines Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "words",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 54,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Community_Guidelines_Read_Time.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Community_Guidelines_Word_Count+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21476532,
      "name": "Open Terms Archive+Community Guidelines Flesch-Kincaid Grade",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Community_Guidelines_Flesch_Kincaid_Grade.json",
      "designer": "Open Terms Archive",
      "title": "Community Guidelines Flesch-Kincaid Grade",
      "question": "What education level is required to understand the Community Guidelines based on the Flesch-Kincaid Grade?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The Community Guidelines are tracked continuously with Open Terms Archive. The <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flesch–Kincaid_readability_tests\">Flesch-Kincaid</a> readability test result is calculated with the <a href=\"https://www.npmjs.com/package/text-readability\"><code>text-readability</code></a> module. This value is then averaged over all versions published in the year.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Community Guidelines Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 54,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Community_Guidelines_Flesch_Kincaid_Grade+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21476540,
      "name": "Open Terms Archive+Community Guidelines Reading Ease",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Community_Guidelines_Reading_Ease.json",
      "designer": "Open Terms Archive",
      "title": "Community Guidelines Reading Ease",
      "question": "How easy is it to read the Community Guidelines according to the Flesch Reading Ease score?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The Community Guidelines are tracked continuously with Open Terms Archive. The <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flesch–Kincaid_readability_tests\">Flesch-Kincaid</a> readability test result is calculated with the <a href=\"https://www.npmjs.com/package/text-readability\"><code>text-readability</code></a> module. This value is then averaged over all versions published in the year.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Community Guidelines Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 54,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Community_Guidelines_Reading_Ease+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21476556,
      "name": "Open Terms Archive+Privacy Policy Word Count",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Privacy_Policy_Word_Count.json",
      "designer": "Open Terms Archive",
      "title": "Privacy Policy Word Count",
      "question": "How long is the Privacy Policy document in number of words?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The Privacy Policy is tracked continuously with Open Terms Archive. The number of words in the collected documents is calculated by using spaces, new lines and tabulations as separators. CJK symbols are counted as words, and punctuation is taken into account. More information can be found on the <a href=\"https://github.com/ngryman/reading-time/\"><code>reading-time</code></a> library. This value is calculated and averaged over all versions published in the year.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "words",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 69,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 23,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Privacy_Policy_Read_Time.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Privacy_Policy_Word_Count+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21476574,
      "name": "Open Terms Archive+Privacy Policy Flesch Grade",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Privacy_Policy_Flesch_Grade.json",
      "designer": "Open Terms Archive",
      "title": "Privacy Policy Flesch Grade",
      "question": "What education level is required to understand the Privacy Policy based on the Flesch-Kincaid Grade?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The Privacy Policy is tracked continuously with Open Terms Archive. The <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flesch–Kincaid_readability_tests\">Flesch-Kincaid</a> readability test result is calculated with the <a href=\"https://www.npmjs.com/package/text-readability\"><code>text-readability</code></a> module. This value is then averaged over all versions published in the year.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 69,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 23,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Privacy_Policy_Flesch_Grade+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21476582,
      "name": "Open Terms Archive+Privacy Policy Reading Ease",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Privacy_Policy_Reading_Ease.json",
      "designer": "Open Terms Archive",
      "title": "Privacy Policy Reading Ease",
      "question": "How easy is it to read the Privacy Policy according to the Flesch Reading Ease score?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The Privacy Policy is tracked continuously with Open Terms Archive. The <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flesch–Kincaid_readability_tests\">Flesch-Kincaid</a> readability test result is calculated with the <a href=\"https://www.npmjs.com/package/text-readability\"><code>text-readability</code></a> module. This value is then averaged over all versions published in the year.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Privacy Policy Document",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 69,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 23,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Community_Guidelines_Grade_Level.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Privacy_Policy_Grade_Level.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Privacy_Policy_Reading_Ease+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21476598,
      "name": "Open Terms Archive+Terms of Service Word Count",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Terms_of_Service_Word_Count.json",
      "designer": "Open Terms Archive",
      "title": "Terms of Service Word Count",
      "question": "How long is the Terms of Service document in number of words?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The Terms of Service are tracked continuously with Open Terms Archive. The number of words in the collected documents is calculated by using spaces, new lines and tabulations as separators. CJK symbols are counted as words, and punctuation is taken into account. More information can be found on the <a href=\"https://github.com/ngryman/reading-time/\"><code>reading-time</code></a> library. This value is calculated and averaged over all versions published in the year.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Terms of Service",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "words",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 70,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 22,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Terms_of_Service_Read_Time.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Terms_of_Service_Word_Count+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21476616,
      "name": "Open Terms Archive+Terms of Service Flesch Grade",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Terms_of_Service_Flesch_Grade.json",
      "designer": "Open Terms Archive",
      "title": "Terms of Service Flesch Grade",
      "question": "What education level is required to understand the Terms of Service based on the Flesch-Kincaid Grade?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The Terms of Service are tracked continuously with Open Terms Archive. The <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flesch–Kincaid_readability_tests\">Flesch-Kincaid</a> readability test result is calculated with the <a href=\"https://www.npmjs.com/package/text-readability\"><code>text-readability</code></a> module. This value is then averaged over all versions published in the year.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Terms of Service",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 70,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 22,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Terms_of_Service_Flesch_Grade+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21476624,
      "name": "Open Terms Archive+Terms of Service Reading Ease",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Terms_of_Service_Reading_Ease.json",
      "designer": "Open Terms Archive",
      "title": "Terms of Service Reading Ease",
      "question": "How easy is it to read the Terms of Service according to the Flesch Reading Ease score?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>The Terms of Service are tracked continuously with Open Terms Archive. The <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flesch–Kincaid_readability_tests\">Flesch-Kincaid</a> readability test result is calculated with the <a href=\"https://www.npmjs.com/package/text-readability\"><code>text-readability</code></a> module. This value is then averaged over all versions published in the year.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Terms of Service",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 70,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 22,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Terms_of_Service_Grade_Level.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Terms_of_Service_Reading_Ease+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21476640,
      "name": "Commons+Digital Service of",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Digital_Service_of.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Digital Service of",
      "question": "Who operates or owns this digital service?",
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Active",
        "Discontinued"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 69,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 23,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Digital_Service_of+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21476648,
      "name": "Commons+Provides Digital Service",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Provides_Digital_Service.json",
      "designer": "Commons",
      "title": "Provides Digital Service",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 62,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Commons+Provides_Digital_Service+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21480073,
      "name": "Open Terms Archive+Community Guidelines Read Time",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Community_Guidelines_Read_Time.json",
      "designer": "Open Terms Archive",
      "title": "Community Guidelines Read Time",
      "question": "How much time (in minutes) does the average user need to read the entire Community Guidelines?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "minutes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  word_count / 200;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~21476514",
          "name": "word_count"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 54,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 19,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Community_Guidelines_Read_Time+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21480095,
      "name": "Open Terms Archive+Privacy Policy Read Time",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Privacy_Policy_Read_Time.json",
      "designer": "Open Terms Archive",
      "title": "Privacy Policy Read Time",
      "question": "How much time (in minutes) does the average user need to read the entire Privacy Policy?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The Privacy Policy is tracked continuously with Open Terms Archive. The reading time of the collected documents is estimated with an average English reading speed of 200 words per minute. It is then averaged over all versions published in the year.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "minutes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  word_count / 200;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~21476556",
          "name": "word_count"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 69,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 23,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Privacy_Policy_Read_Time+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21480107,
      "name": "Open Terms Archive+Terms of Service Read Time",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Terms_of_Service_Read_Time.json",
      "designer": "Open Terms Archive",
      "title": "Terms of Service Read Time",
      "question": "How much time (in minutes) does the average user need to read the entire Terms of Service?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The Terms of Service are tracked continuously with Open Terms Archive. The reading time of the collected documents is estimated with an average English reading speed of 200 words per minute. It is then averaged over all versions published in the year.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "minutes",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  word_count / 200;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~21476598",
          "name": "word_count"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 70,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 22,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Terms_of_Service_Read_Time+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21480137,
      "name": "Open Terms Archive+Community Guidelines Grade Level",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Community_Guidelines_Grade_Level.json",
      "designer": "Open Terms Archive",
      "title": "Community Guidelines Grade Level",
      "question": "What is the school grade level needed to understand the Community Guidelines?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The Community Guidelines are tracked continuously with Open Terms Archive. The [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flesch–Kincaid_readability_tests|Flesch-Kincaid]] readability test result is calculated with the [[https://www.npmjs.com/package/text-readability|text-readability]] module. This value is then averaged over all versions published in the year. The resulting grade is derived based on cohort assessments made in the USA.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "5th grade (Very easy)",
        "6th grade (Easy)",
        "7th grade (Fairly easy)",
        "8th & 9th grade (Plain English)",
        "10th to 12th grade (Fairly difficult)",
        "College (Difficult)",
        "College graduate (Very difficult)",
        "Professional (Extremely difficult)"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var getReadabilityGradeLevel;\n\n  getReadabilityGradeLevel = function(score) {\n    if (score >= 90) {\n      return '5th grade (Very easy)';\n    }\n    if (score >= 80) {\n      return '6th grade (Easy)';\n    }\n    if (score >= 70) {\n      return '7th grade (Fairly easy)';\n    }\n    if (score >= 60) {\n      return '8th & 9th grade (Plain English)';\n    }\n    if (score >= 50) {\n      return '10th to 12th grade (Fairly difficult)';\n    }\n    if (score >= 30) {\n      return 'College (Difficult)';\n    }\n    if (score >= 10) {\n      return 'College graduate (Very difficult)';\n    }\n    return 'Professional (Extremely difficult)';\n  };\n\n  getReadabilityGradeLevel(score);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~21476582",
          "name": "score"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 69,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 23,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Community_Guidelines_Grade_Level+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21480149,
      "name": "Open Terms Archive+Privacy Policy Grade Level",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Privacy_Policy_Grade_Level.json",
      "designer": "Open Terms Archive",
      "title": "Privacy Policy Grade Level",
      "question": "What is the school grade level needed to understand the Privacy Policy?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The Privacy Policies are tracked continuously with Open Terms Archive. The [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flesch–Kincaid_readability_tests|Flesch-Kincaid]] readability test result is calculated with the [[https://www.npmjs.com/package/text-readability|text-readability]] module. This value is then averaged over all versions published in the year. The resulting grade is derived based on cohort assessments made in the USA.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "5th grade (Very easy)",
        "6th grade (Easy)",
        "7th grade (Fairly easy)",
        "8th & 9th grade (Plain English)",
        "10th to 12th grade (Fairly difficult)",
        "College (Difficult)",
        "College graduate (Very difficult)",
        "Professional (Extremely difficult)"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var getReadabilityGradeLevel;\n\n  getReadabilityGradeLevel = function(score) {\n    if (score >= 90) {\n      return '5th grade (Very easy)';\n    }\n    if (score >= 80) {\n      return '6th grade (Easy)';\n    }\n    if (score >= 70) {\n      return '7th grade (Fairly easy)';\n    }\n    if (score >= 60) {\n      return '8th & 9th grade (Plain English)';\n    }\n    if (score >= 50) {\n      return '10th to 12th grade (Fairly difficult)';\n    }\n    if (score >= 30) {\n      return 'College (Difficult)';\n    }\n    if (score >= 10) {\n      return 'College graduate (Very difficult)';\n    }\n    return 'Professional (Extremely difficult)';\n  };\n\n  getReadabilityGradeLevel(score);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~21476582",
          "name": "score"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 69,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 23,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Privacy_Policy_Grade_Level+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21480161,
      "name": "Open Terms Archive+Terms of Service Grade Level",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Terms_of_Service_Grade_Level.json",
      "designer": "Open Terms Archive",
      "title": "Terms of Service Grade Level",
      "question": "What is the school grade level needed to understand the Terms of Service?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>The Terms of Service are tracked continuously with Open Terms Archive. The [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flesch–Kincaid_readability_tests|Flesch-Kincaid]] readability test result is calculated with the [[https://www.npmjs.com/package/text-readability|text-readability]] module. This value is then averaged over all versions published in the year. The resulting grade is derived based on cohort assessments made in the USA.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "5th grade (Very easy)",
        "6th grade (Easy)",
        "7th grade (Fairly easy)",
        "8th & 9th grade (Plain English)",
        "10th to 12th grade (Fairly difficult)",
        "College (Difficult)",
        "College graduate (Very difficult)",
        "Professional (Extremely difficult)"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var getReadabilityGradeLevel;\n\n  getReadabilityGradeLevel = function(score) {\n    if (score >= 90) {\n      return '5th grade (Very easy)';\n    }\n    if (score >= 80) {\n      return '6th grade (Easy)';\n    }\n    if (score >= 70) {\n      return '7th grade (Fairly easy)';\n    }\n    if (score >= 60) {\n      return '8th & 9th grade (Plain English)';\n    }\n    if (score >= 50) {\n      return '10th to 12th grade (Fairly difficult)';\n    }\n    if (score >= 30) {\n      return 'College (Difficult)';\n    }\n    if (score >= 10) {\n      return 'College graduate (Very difficult)';\n    }\n    return 'Professional (Extremely difficult)';\n  };\n\n  getReadabilityGradeLevel(score);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~21476624",
          "name": "score"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 70,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 22,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Open_Terms_Archive+Terms_of_Service_Grade_Level+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21495798,
      "name": "Jaiguru Jewellers+Shopping & retail",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Jaiguru_Jewellers+Shopping_retail.json",
      "designer": "Jaiguru Jewellers",
      "title": "Shopping & retail",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<div style=\"border: 0px solid rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.08); box-sizing: border-box; overflow-wrap: break-word; --tw-border-spacing-x: 0; --tw-border-spacing-y: 0; --tw-translate-x: 0; --tw-translate-y: 0; --tw-rotate: 0; --tw-skew-x: 0; --tw-skew-y: 0; --tw-scale-x: 1; --tw-scale-y: 1; --tw-scroll-snap-strictness: proximity; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: #3b82f680; --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-shadow-colored: 0 0 #0000; color: rgba(38, 38, 38, 0.75); --tw-space-y-reverse: 0; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-top: 16px; font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, 'Apple Color Emoji', 'Segoe UI Emoji'; font-size: 14px; background-color: #ffffff;\"><strong>Jai Guru Jewellers </strong>is your trusted destination for exquisite gold and silver jewellery that blends timeless tradition with modern elegance. With a legacy of craftsmanship and quality, we offer a wide range of finely crafted ornaments perfect for every occasion. From classic bridal sets to daily wear treasures, each piece reflects precision and passion. Discover jewellery that complements your style and celebrates your moments with Jai Guru Jewellers. https://www.jaigurujewellers.in/</div>\r\n<p> </p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Jaiguru_Jewellers+Shopping_retail+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 21496953,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Archive of non-financial reports",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Archive_of_non_financial_reports.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Archive of non-financial reports",
      "question": "Does the company archive its non-financial reports on its own website?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span><em>Why is this important?</em><br><br>It is essential that companies archive their disclosures to enable accurate assessments over time. <br><br><em>Context:</em><br><br>When a company removes or replaces the URL of its annual report with the latest version, it becomes nearly impossible for analysts to track progress. Maintaining an organized archive of past disclosures is therefore a key transparency practice. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This question most likely requires you to add a new Source.  </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Note:</span> When adding a new Source, the pdf-snapshot maker does not always capture webpages well. In those cases, go back to the webpage, right-click 'Print', make sure the option 'Print headers and footer' is selected, and 'Save as pdf'. Then add it to Wikirate as a pdf, and add the URL address to the description of the Source.</p>\r\n<p>Go to the company's homepage (link can be found on the company profile on Wikirate) and look for the place where they publish their disclosures. Common names for such pages are ‘Downloads', ‘Reports’, and 'Sustainability'. If you cannot easily find such a page, use their search bar to look for the report. </p>\r\n<p>Alternatively, use a search engine of your choice and look for:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>[company name] annual report</p>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>\r\n<p>[company name] sustainability report</p>\r\n</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> Make sure to look for a page on the company website that has an <strong>archive</strong> of their current AND previous sustainability/annual reports, not a direct link to the document you included in your search terms. </p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>If you find such an archive, that is the page you now will use to create a new Source on Wikirate and which you will cite for your answer.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Archive of non-financial reports+Wikirate International e.V."
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Archive_of_non_financial_reports+Wikirate_International_e_V.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Archive_of_non_financial_reports+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22167310,
      "name": "Spatial Finance Initiative+capacity_daily",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Spatial_Finance_Initiative+capacity_daily.json",
      "designer": "Spatial Finance Initiative",
      "title": "capacity_daily",
      "question": "What is the total beef slaughtering capacity (heads/day) of a facility?\r\n",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Spatial_Finance_Initiative+capacity_daily+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22197265,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Aligned page numbering",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Aligned_page_numbering.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Aligned page numbering",
      "question": "Does the page numbering of the company's non-financial report align with the numbering of the (PDF) viewer tool?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><em>Why is this important?</em><br><br>Misalignment between the page numbers on the report's pages and the page numbering of a (PDF) viewer tool can lead to confusion or even misrepresentation of the data when extracted from the report. <br><br><em>Context:</em></p>\r\n<p>Many digital tools, including many AI tools, treat the first page of a PDF as page 1 by default. If a company has a different approach and for instance considers page 1 to be the first page after the cover pages, that results in misalignment. </p>\r\n<p><span></span></p>\r\n<p>Standardization, even for something seemingly minor like page numbers, is an important data hygiene practice. When data is extracted from a report, evidence of where that information was found in the report is gathered and stored with the data. When a report's page numbers do not match it can create confusion or even misrepresentation of the data.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>You are looking to determine if the report's page numbers match the page numbering of the (PDF)  viewer tool. A mismatch happens when (for instance) the company only starts with page 1 after the cover pages.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Aligned page numbering+Wikirate International e.V."
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Aligned_page_numbering+Wikirate_International_e_V.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Aligned_page_numbering+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22197278,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Reporting standards",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_standards.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Reporting standards",
      "question": "Which of the following standards does the company use for its non-financial reporting?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><em>Why is this important?</em><br><br>When more companies use the same reporting standards, non-financial data becomes easier to compare due to standardization.<br><br><em>Context:</em><br><br>There are lots of national and international standards that companies can use to organize and report their non-financial data. Most standards provide guidance and a methodology for collecting, analyzing, and reporting data. <span></span></p>\r\n<p>Each standard puts a different emphasis on materiality – that is what data is relevant or significant for a company to disclose. By identifying the most commonly used standards, we can better understand which materiality perspective is currently dominant.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>You will likely find this information at the beginning or the end of the report, or in an appendix.</p>\r\n<p>Search the document using the abbreviations of the different standards, such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>GRI</li>\r\n<li>SASB</li>\r\n<li>IFRS</li>\r\n<li>CSRD</li>\r\n<li>ESRS</li>\r\n<li>etc</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Companies might use several standards for their reporting so make sure to check for all options and select as many answer options as apply.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Note:</strong> It is not sufficient when a company has been rated by one of the standards providers. For instance, if they have been rated by CDP that does NOT qualify as them using CDP in their reporting. You need to see them really using the standard in the methodology of their own reporting.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Note: </strong>For the IFRS standards (developed by the ISSB) only IFRS S1 (general sustainability disclosures) and IFRS S2 (environmental) would be relevant  standards that apply to non-financial data. </p>\r\n<p><span></span></p>\r\n<p>Add in the comments on which page number you found the standard(s) that the company uses.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "GRI Standards",
        "ISSB (IFRS)",
        "SASB",
        "CSRD (ESRS)",
        "CDP",
        "CDSB",
        "Greenhouse Gas Protocol",
        "National standards",
        "Other",
        "None"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Reporting standards+Wikirate International e.V."
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_standards+Wikirate_International_e_V.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_standards+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22197291,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Data license type",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Data_license_type.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Data license type",
      "question": "Did the company apply an open or closed data license to its non-financial report?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><span><em>Why is it important?</em><br><br>An open data license is essential to maximize the potential of the data provided in non-financial reports. <br><br><em>Context:</em><br><br>An open data license allows  third parties to reuse the data– enabling analysis, combination with other sources and generation of additional insights. Additionally, it builds trust in the reporting company as it signals its commitment to transparency and innovation. </span></p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To determine if the company explicitly states what type of data license applies to their disclosure, use keyword searches such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>license</li>\r\n<li>terms of use</li>\r\n<li>copyright</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>If a license is specified add the type of license in the comments, including the page number where you found the information.</p>\r\n<p>Select ‘<strong>Open license</strong>’ if: The data is made available under a license that permits reuse, redistribution, and possibly modification, with or without conditions.</p>\r\n<p>Select ‘<strong>Closed license</strong>’ if: The data is provided under restrictive terms that limit reuse or redistribution.</p>\r\n<p>Select ‘<strong>Not specified</strong>’ if: The license status is unknown or not explicitly stated by the company.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Open license",
        "Closed license",
        "Not specified"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Annual Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Data license type+Wikirate International e.V."
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Data_license_type+Wikirate_International_e_V.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Data_license_type+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22197308,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Double materiality assessment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Double_materiality_assessment.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Double materiality assessment",
      "question": "Did the company conduct a double materiality assessment to inform its non-financial reporting?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>A materiality assessment helps companies to identify which data is  relevant or significant to include in their reporting. It typically considers their impacts, risks and opportunities from a particular viewpoint.</p>\r\n<p><strong>Double materiality</strong> refers to the concept that a company's non-financial reporting should consider two perspectives:</p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li>Financial materiality - <em>the impact of sustainability issues on the company’s financial performance </em></li>\r\n<li>Impact materiality -  <em>the company's impact on the environment and society</em></li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p>In other words, double materiality combines the <strong>inward</strong> <strong>perspective</strong> (how external factors impact the company) and the <strong>outward</strong> <strong>perspective </strong>(how the company impacts its surroundings).</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To determine if the company has conducted a double materiality assessment, use keyword searches such as:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Double materiality</li>\r\n<li>DMA</li>\r\n<li>IRO-1</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>If the company only mentions a materiality assessment but does not specify that it is a <strong>double</strong> materiality assessment, select 'No'. </p>\r\n<p>If the company mentions the concept of double materiality but does not specifically state it has done an <strong>assessment</strong> to inform its reporting, select 'No'. </p>\r\n<p>Add in the comments the page number where you found the relevant information for the answer you selected.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Materiality Assessment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Double_materiality_assessment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22197321,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Lobbying budget disclosed",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Lobbying_budget_disclosed.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Lobbying budget disclosed",
      "question": "Did the company disclose the size of their lobbying budget?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p><em>Why is it important?</em></p>\r\n<p>Transparency around lobbying activities – including budgets, goals and actions –  is essential to assess if the company is supporting or undermining social and environmental progress. </p>\r\n<p><em>Context:</em></p>\r\n<p>Like many other stakeholders, companies take part in political lobbying to influence legislation and  policy decisions. This can include bilateral meetings, advisory groups and roundtables, running campaigns, or through participation in industry associations.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>To determine if the company disclosed its lobby budget (total monetary value), search for the following key words:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>lobby</li>\r\n<li>contribution</li>\r\n<li>donation</li>\r\n<li>politic</li>\r\n<li>G1-5 (relevant ESRS disclosure requirement)</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>If a lobbying budget is specified add the size of the budget and any relevant disclosure in the comments and include the page number where you found the information.</p>\r\n<p>If the company does not disclose a lobby budget but a political contributions budget, that can also be accepted as a \"Yes\" for this metric question.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying Expenditures",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Lobbying_budget_disclosed+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22197335,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Supplier audits",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Supplier_audits.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Supplier audits",
      "question": "Did the company conduct any type of supplier audits?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Companies conduct supplier audits to ensure their suppliers meet defined quality, safety, and compliance standards. This proactive approach gives companies greater visibility in their supply chain, helping them to identify potential risks, improve supplier performance, and maintain product quality.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>At this point we are simply looking to determine if the company is conducting any type of supplier audits. We do not screen for social and environmental issues or whether it was conducted by an independent party.</p>\r\n<p>Keyword searches include:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Audit</li>\r\n<li>Supplier audit</li>\r\n<li>Site visit</li>\r\n<li>Onsite</li>\r\n<li>On-site</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Add in the comments the page number where you found the relevant information.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Supplier_audits+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22210820,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Proportion of the supply chain that the brand directly owns or controls at finished product manufacturing factories",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Proportion_of_the_supply_chain_that_the_brand_directly_owns_or_controls_at_finished_product_manufacturing_factories.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Proportion of the supply chain that the brand directly owns or controls at finished product manufacturing factories",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the proportion of the supply chain that the brand directly owns or controls at finished product manufacturing factories (e.g. production units, cut make trim (CMT) facilities, garment sewing, garment finishing, etc.)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "We only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Proportion of the supply chain that the brand directly owns or controls at finished product manufacturing factories+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 204,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 204,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Proportion_of_the_supply_chain_that_the_brand_directly_owns_or_controls_at_finished_product_manufacturing_factories+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Proportion_of_the_supply_chain_that_the_brand_directly_owns_or_controls_at_finished_product_manufacturing_factories+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22210831,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Weekly or monthly take-home wage for entry-level workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Weekly_or_monthly_take_home_wage_for_entry_level_workers.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Weekly or monthly take-home wage for entry-level workers",
      "question": "Does the company disclose weekly or monthly take-home wage for entry-level workers based on a standard work week of no more than 48 weekly working hours, excluding overtime?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "We are looking for disclosure per facility. <br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Weekly or monthly take-home wage for entry-level workers+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 204,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 204,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Weekly_or_monthly_take_home_wage_for_entry_level_workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Wage_Data_Disclosure.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Weekly_or_monthly_take_home_wage_for_entry_level_workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22210842,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Proportion of the supply chain that the brand directly owns or controls at intermediate material processing & material manufacturing level",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Proportion_of_the_supply_chain_that_the_brand_directly_owns_or_controls_at_intermediate_material_processing_material_manufacturing_level.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Proportion of the supply chain that the brand directly owns or controls at intermediate material processing & material manufacturing level",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the proportion of the supply chain that the brand directly owns or controls at intermediate material processing & material manufacturing level (e.g. spinning, knitting, weaving, dyeing and wet processing, tanneries, embroidering, printing, fabric finishing, laundries, etc.)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "We only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Proportion of the supply chain that the brand directly owns or controls at intermediate material processing & material manufacturing level+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 204,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 204,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Proportion_of_the_supply_chain_that_the_brand_directly_owns_or_controls_at_intermediate_material_processing_material_manufacturing_level+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Proportion_of_the_supply_chain_that_the_brand_directly_owns_or_controls_at_intermediate_material_processing_material_manufacturing_level+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22210853,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Long-term (2040-2050) science-based targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Long_term_2040_2050_science_based_targets.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Long-term (2040-2050) science-based targets",
      "question": "Does the company publish long-term (2040-2050) science-based targets (aligned with the 1.5°C pathway) in line with the Science Based Targets Initiative?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "We are looking for disclosure that is approved by SBTi and covers scopes 1,2 and 3 and includes accounting for land-based emissions or removals in their targets or disclosures. Further guidance for Apparel and Footwear and Forest, Land and Agriculture guidance (FLAG)<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Long-term (2040-2050) science-based targets+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Long_term_2040_2050_science_based_targets+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Long_term_2040_2050_science_based_targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22210864,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Strategy or efforts to electrify supply chain manufacturing processes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Strategy_or_efforts_to_electrify_supply_chain_manufacturing_processes.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Strategy or efforts to electrify supply chain manufacturing processes",
      "question": "Does the company disclose strategy or efforts to electrify supply chain manufacturing processes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "Electrification is defined as transitioning from fossil fuels for heating to electrified solutions like boilers and heat pumps that can decarbonise when powered by renewable electricity sources.<br>\n<br>\nWe are looking for efforts to electrify processes including textile production, spinning and weaving, dyeing and printing and garment assembly.<br>\n<br>\nWe will also accept disclosure on other actions such as feasibility studies and energy auditing costs. <br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Strategy or efforts to electrify supply chain manufacturing processes+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Strategy_or_efforts_to_electrify_supply_chain_manufacturing_processes+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Strategy_or_efforts_to_electrify_supply_chain_manufacturing_processes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22210875,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Target to phase-out combustion of coal on-site at finished garment manufacturing factories",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Target_to_phase_out_combustion_of_coal_on_site_at_finished_garment_manufacturing_factories.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Target to phase-out combustion of coal on-site at finished garment manufacturing factories",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a time-bound and measurable target to phase-out combustion of coal on-site at finished garment manufacturing factories?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "By finished product manufacturing factories, we mean production units, cut make trim (CMT) facilities, garment sewing, garment finishing, etc. For more details, view the Tier 1 categorisation of Textile Exchange's Supply Chain Taxonomy Framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe target must be time-bound, measurable and disclosed in the public domain. Citing membership to the United Nation's Fashion Industry Charter for Climate Action alone is not sufficient to receive points. <br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Target to phase-out combustion of coal on-site at finished garment manufacturing factories+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Target_to_phase_out_combustion_of_coal_on_site_at_finished_garment_manufacturing_factories+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Target_to_phase_out_combustion_of_coal_on_site_at_finished_garment_manufacturing_factories+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22210886,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Target to phase-out combustion of coal on-site at material processing/manufacturing facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Target_to_phase_out_combustion_of_coal_on_site_at_material_processing_manufacturing_facilities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Target to phase-out combustion of coal on-site at material processing/manufacturing facilities",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a time-bound and measurable target to phase-out combustion of coal on-site at material processing/manufacturing facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "By material processing/manufacturing facilities, we mean spinning, knitting, weaving, dyeing and wet processing, tanneries, embroidering, printing, fabric finishing, laundries, etc. For more details, view the Tiers 2 and 3 categorisation of Textile Exchange's Supply Chain Taxonomy Framework.<br>\n<br>\nThe target must be time-bound, measurable and disclosed in the public domain. Citing membership to the United Nation's Fashion Industry Charter for Climate Action alone is not sufficient to receive points. <br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Target to phase-out combustion of coal on-site at material processing/manufacturing facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Target_to_phase_out_combustion_of_coal_on_site_at_material_processing_manufacturing_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Target_to_phase_out_combustion_of_coal_on_site_at_material_processing_manufacturing_facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22210897,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Coal phase-out target specify the percentage of total production volume it applies to",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Coal_phase_out_target_specify_the_percentage_of_total_production_volume_it_applies_to.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Coal phase-out target specify the percentage of total production volume it applies to",
      "question": "Does the coal phase-out target specify the percentage of total production volume it applies to?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "We acknowledge and reward brands that demonstrate transparency in their coal phase-out targets. Brands that explicitly disclose the percentage of production volume covered by their target will be recognised.<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Coal phase-out target specify the percentage of total production volume it applies to+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Coal_phase_out_target_specify_the_percentage_of_total_production_volume_it_applies_to+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Coal_phase_out_target_specify_the_percentage_of_total_production_volume_it_applies_to+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22210908,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Coal-phase-out target include purchased steam",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Coal_phase_out_target_include_purchased_steam.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Coal-phase-out target include purchased steam",
      "question": "Does the coal-phase-out target include purchased steam?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "We acknowledge and reward brands that are transparent about their coal phase-out targets. Brands that clearly state that their coal phase-out target includes purchased steam will receive recognition. Additionally, brands may earn points if they have a separate target specifically addressing purchased steam.<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Coal-phase-out target include purchased steam+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Coal_phase_out_target_include_purchased_steam+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Coal_phase_out_target_include_purchased_steam+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22210919,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Disclose real-time heat and humidity levels in production facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_real_time_heat_and_humidity_levels_in_production_facilities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Disclose real-time heat and humidity levels in production facilities",
      "question": "Does the company disclose real-time heat and humidity levels in production facilities within the brand's supply chain to assess and track worker heat stress risk (e.g., wet bulb globe temperatures exceeding 30.5°C for moderate heat stress)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "Heat stress is a significant occupational health risk for workers, particularly in garment factories located in production countries and regions with high temperatures and humidity. Exposure to high wet bulb globe temperatures (WBGT) above 30.5°C, which corresponds to 'moderate' heat stress, can cause severe health effects, including heat stroke and dehydration, and impair worker productivity.<br>\n<br>\nTo address this issue, it is critical for brands to track and disclose primary data on temperature and humidity levels in their supply chain factories. The technology to monitor heat and humidity is readily available, inexpensive, and reliable. Tracking and transparency of this data are essential so that manufacturers, unions, and brands can establish baselines, track productivity changes against various WBGT thresholds, and calculate returns on adaptive investments such as cooling systems and flood defences.<br>\n<br>\nThis guidance aligns with the Hot Air report, which highlights the increasing frequency of high-heat days in major garment production hubs, including Vietnam. Given this trend, urgent adaptation measures - such as improved ventilation, cooling systems, and worker heat safety protocols - are necessary to protect workers. Additionally, relevant national laws and standards on occupational heat stress, such as those in Vietnam (see Hot Air report, p. 14), should be referenced to ensure compliance and best practice.<br>\n<br>\nBest practice would include the following disclosure:<br>\n<br>\n- Regular, publicly available data on daily high WBGT levels in factories, including instances where worker safety thresholds (e.g., WBGT exceeding 30.5°C) are surpassed.<br>\n- The number of days in which WBGT levels exceed 30.5°C.<br>\n- The percentage of supplier factories included in monitoring efforts and the geographical regions covered.<br>\n<br>\nSee the Hot Air report for more information on the impact of rising temperatures on workers' health and recommendations for addressing heat stress in garment production.<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Disclose real-time heat and humidity levels in production facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_real_time_heat_and_humidity_levels_in_production_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_real_time_heat_and_humidity_levels_in_production_facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22210930,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Disclose exit strategy when a brand leaves a supplier",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_exit_strategy_when_a_brand_leaves_a_supplier.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Disclose exit strategy when a brand leaves a supplier",
      "question": "Does the company disclose exit strategy when a brand leaves a supplier?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "We are looking for the specific steps that the company takes when ending a relationship with a supplier to manage the possible adverse impacts and risks to workers. This may be referred to as a responsible exit strategy. We will not accept vague disclosure to ‘responsibly exit’ unless qualified with details on the steps taken. We are looking for the specific steps that the company takes when ending a relationship with a supplier to manage the possible adverse impacts and risks to workers - e.g. ensuring that policy is not to just cut-and-run, including an assessment on potential adverse human rights impacts and ensuring suppliers are given reasonable notice of intent to terminate the relationship.<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Disclose exit strategy when a brand leaves a supplier+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 204,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 204,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_exit_strategy_when_a_brand_leaves_a_supplier+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_exit_strategy_when_a_brand_leaves_a_supplier+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22210941,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Disclose annual percentage change in average price per item paid to suppliers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_annual_percentage_change_in_average_price_per_item_paid_to_suppliers.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Disclose annual percentage change in average price per item paid to suppliers",
      "question": "Does the company disclose annual percentage change in average price per item paid to suppliers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "For example, the average price paid to a supplier in 2024 was US$11 per item, and the average price in 2023 was US$10 per item. This represents a 10% increase in the average price paid to suppliers.<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Disclose annual percentage change in average price per item paid to suppliers+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 204,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 204,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_annual_percentage_change_in_average_price_per_item_paid_to_suppliers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_annual_percentage_change_in_average_price_per_item_paid_to_suppliers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22210952,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Total annual investment in grid-scale renewable energy projects",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Total_annual_investment_in_grid_scale_renewable_energy_projects.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Total annual investment in grid-scale renewable energy projects",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the brand's total annual investment in grid-scale renewable energy projects in garment-producing countries that contribute to increasing the share of renewable energy in the national grid?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. <br>\n<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "Points will only be awarded if the annual investment amount is explicitly disclosed.<br>\n<br>\nThe investment must be directed towards renewable energy in garment-producing countries. Joint pledges that disclose the total investment amount will also be accepted, even if the contribution from each individual fashion brand is not disaggregated.<br>\n<br>\nFor example, a brand's commitment to investing in an offshore wind project in a production country as part of a joint pledge will be recognised.<br>\n<br>\nFor projects announced prior to 2024, to receive points we require updates on the project's stage (e.g., planning, construction, operational) and tangible, measurable progress (e.g., completion milestones, capacity added to the grid). <br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Total annual investment in grid-scale renewable energy projects+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Total_annual_investment_in_grid_scale_renewable_energy_projects+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Total_annual_investment_in_grid_scale_renewable_energy_projects+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22210963,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Progress against the coal-phase out target in the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Progress_against_the_coal_phase_out_target_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Progress against the coal-phase out target in the supply chain",
      "question": "Does the company disclose progress against the coal-phase out target in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. <br>\n<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "We are looking for transparency on the number of sites or the percentage of sites still using coal fired boilers. <br>\n<br>\nWe will also accept disclosure of the alternative energy sources being pursued, along with evidence of feasibility studies for phasing out fossil fuels. This should be broken down by country and include key outcomes, such as identified barriers and corresponding action plans.<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Progress against the coal-phase out target in the supply chain+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Progress_against_the_coal_phase_out_target_in_the_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Progress_against_the_coal_phase_out_target_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22210974,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Annual carbon footprint or GHG emissions in Scopes 1&2",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Annual_carbon_footprint_or_GHG_emissions_in_Scopes_1_2.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Annual carbon footprint or GHG emissions in Scopes 1&2",
      "question": "Does the company publish annual carbon footprint or GHG emissions in Scopes 1&2 owned and operated facilities (e.g. head office, retail stores, distribution centres, warehouses, transport and mail orders, etc.)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. <br>\n<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "We are looking for carbon footprint data broken down by country and emission type as well as a detail of the approach to quantify - whether location based or market-based. Please refer to the GHG Protocol's definition of market-based versus location-based methodology. This may be disclosed in CDP questionnaire C6, C7.2, C7.5.<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Annual carbon footprint or GHG emissions in Scopes 1&2+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Annual_carbon_footprint_or_GHG_emissions_in_Scopes_1_2+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Annual_carbon_footprint_or_GHG_emissions_in_Scopes_1_2+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22210985,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Annual value chain/scope 3 carbon footprint",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Annual_value_chain_scope_3_carbon_footprint.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Annual value chain/scope 3 carbon footprint",
      "question": "Does the company publish annual value chain/scope 3 carbon footprint, focusing on detailed calculations on GHG emissions in the supply chain (e.g. at product manufacturing factories and material processing facilities, textile production, raw material production), with estimations for downstream impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. <br>\n<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "Points will only be awarded if brands disclose emissions aligned with GHG protocol under purchased goods and services.<br>\n<br>\nThe supply chain means supplier factories, processing facilities, fabric suppliers, tier one and beyond. This may be disclosed in CDP questionnaire C6. <br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Annual value chain/scope 3 carbon footprint+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Annual_value_chain_scope_3_carbon_footprint+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Annual_value_chain_scope_3_carbon_footprint+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22211119,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Disclose what energy is used in the company's owned and operated facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_what_energy_is_used_in_the_company_s_owned_and_operated_facilities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Disclose what energy is used in the company's owned and operated facilities",
      "question": "Does the company disclose what energy is used in the company's owned and operated facilities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "We are looking for a detailed breakdown of energy use by source, showing the percentage of renewable and non-renewable energy used for Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions. This should be reported as a percentage of the company's total energy consumption. This information may also be included in CDP questionnaire section C8.<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Disclose what energy is used in the company's owned and operated facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_what_energy_is_used_in_the_company_s_owned_and_operated_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_what_energy_is_used_in_the_company_s_owned_and_operated_facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22211130,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Disclose what energy is used in the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_what_energy_is_used_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Disclose what energy is used in the supply chain",
      "question": "Does the company disclose what energy is used in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "We are looking for a detailed breakdown of energy use by source, showing the percentage of renewable and non-renewable energy used for Scope 3 emissions. This should be reported as a percentage of the company's total energy consumption.<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Disclose what energy is used in the supply chain+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_what_energy_is_used_in_the_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_what_energy_is_used_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22211141,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Breakdown of the energy consumption by country in the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Breakdown_of_the_energy_consumption_by_country_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Breakdown of the energy consumption by country in the supply chain",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a breakdown of the energy consumption by country in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "The data should be presented as a percentage of total energy consumed in that country. For example: Bangladesh – 60% natural gas, 27% biomass, 10% imported oil, and 3% solar electricity.<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Breakdown of the energy consumption by country in the supply chain+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Breakdown_of_the_energy_consumption_by_country_in_the_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Breakdown_of_the_energy_consumption_by_country_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22211152,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Energy sources used for heating and steam in the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_sources_used_for_heating_and_steam_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Energy sources used for heating and steam in the supply chain",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the energy sources used for heating and steam in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "We are looking for transparency on the types of energy used for thermal processes across the supply chain. For material processing/manufacturing, thermal processes include heating water for fabric dyeing and generating steam for textile manufacturing.<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Energy sources used for heating and steam in the supply chain+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_sources_used_for_heating_and_steam_in_the_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_sources_used_for_heating_and_steam_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22211163,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Disclose details on how much electricity is used in the supply chain and where it comes from",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_details_on_how_much_electricity_is_used_in_the_supply_chain_and_where_it_comes_from.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Disclose details on how much electricity is used in the supply chain and where it comes from",
      "question": "Does the company disclose details on how much electricity is used in the supply chain and where it comes from?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "We are looking for:<br>\n- Total MWH of electricity consumed in the supply chain<br>\n- Annual electricity consumption across the supply chain<br>\n- A breakdown of electricity consumption to specific suppliers, locations or activities<br>\n- Full upstream scope 3 emissions<br>\n- Disclosure of who major suppliers are, and their location<br>\n- Historical data (at least 3 years) for all data points<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Disclose details on how much electricity is used in the supply chain and where it comes from+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_details_on_how_much_electricity_is_used_in_the_supply_chain_and_where_it_comes_from+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_details_on_how_much_electricity_is_used_in_the_supply_chain_and_where_it_comes_from+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22211174,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Disclose how the company sources energy for its own facilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_how_the_company_sources_energy_for_its_own_facilities.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Disclose how the company sources energy for its own facilities",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how the company sources energy for its own facilities (such as head office, retail stores, distribution centers, and warehouses)? This includes whether energy is self-generated, bought through Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs), contracted with energy suppliers, or sourced via renewable energy certificates (EACs/RECs) and other methods",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "This may be disclosed in CDP questionnaire C8.2. Disclosure should include details on the following:<br>\n<br>\n- Type of renewable electricity/supply construct (such as PPA, utility contract…)<br>\n- Location of renewable electricity generation capacity for each construct<br>\n- Volume of electricity procured through each construct<br>\n- % of electricity demand covered by the construct <br>\n- For PPAs, agreements regarding the bundling (or cancellation) of any associated certificates<br>\n<br>\nFor definitions on these procurement types, please view the RE100 Technical Criteria on pg. 8<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Disclose how the company sources energy for its own facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_how_the_company_sources_energy_for_its_own_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_how_the_company_sources_energy_for_its_own_facilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22211185,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Disclose how energy is currently sourced in the supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_how_energy_is_currently_sourced_in_the_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Disclose how energy is currently sourced in the supply chain",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how energy is currently sourced in the supply chain, including product manufacturing factories, material processing facilities, textile production, and raw material production? This includes whether energy is self-generated, bought through Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs), contracted with energy suppliers, or sourced via enewable energy certificates (EACs/RECs) and other methods",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "The purpose of this indicator is for transparency on the procurement type to assess its quality. Disclosure should include details on the following:<br>\n<br>\n- Type of renewable electricity/supply construct (such as PPA, utility contract…)<br>\n- Location of renewable electricity generation capacity for each construct<br>\n- Volume of electricity procured through each construct.<br>\n- For PPAs, agreements regarding the bundling (or cancellation) of any associated certificates<br>\n<br>\nFor definitions on these procurement types, please view the RE100 Technical Criteria on pg. 8 <br>\n<br>\nBy supply chain we mean product manufacturing factories, material processing facilities, textile production, raw material production, etc.<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Disclose how energy is currently sourced in the supply chain+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_how_energy_is_currently_sourced_in_the_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_how_energy_is_currently_sourced_in_the_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22211196,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Annual investment and the type of financial support for decarbonisation in supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Annual_investment_and_the_type_of_financial_support_for_decarbonisation_in_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Annual investment and the type of financial support for decarbonisation in supply chain",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the brand's total annual investment and the type of financial support provided to suppliers for capital expenditure (CapEx) aimed at meeting supply chain decarbonisation targets? This includes funding for renewable energy infrastructure, decarbonisation technologies, and energy-efficient solutions to lower energy consumption and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "Brands should demonstrate how they financially support suppliers in transitioning to meet decarbonisation targets by investing in:<br>\n<br>\n- Renewable Energy Infrastructure: Funding for solar panels, wind energy, or other clean energy solutions.<br>\n- Decarbonisation Technologies: Support for replacing coal-powered boilers with electric alternatives or installing renewable energy systems.<br>\n- Energy-Efficient Manufacturing Solutions: Investment in technologies such as heat pumps, waterless dyeing tech, energy-efficient machinery, metering, optimising and repairing equipment, better building insulation or any other energy efficient or innovative machinery that reduces thermal energy need. Energy efficiency improvements are readily implementable changes that can be made in facilities to reduce the energy required to perform the same process.<br>\n- Participation in Industry Programmes: Engagement in initiatives like Aii’s Clean by Design Programme and the Partnership for Cleaner Textiles (PaCT).<br>\n<br>\nPoints will only be awarded where the annual investment amount is explicitly disclosed. Regarding financial support, examples could include direct grants, low-interest or interest-free loans, subsidies, rebates, equity investments, power purchase agreements (PPAs), and risk-sharing mechanisms.<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Annual investment and the type of financial support for decarbonisation in supply chain+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Annual_investment_and_the_type_of_financial_support_for_decarbonisation_in_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Annual_investment_and_the_type_of_financial_support_for_decarbonisation_in_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22211207,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Brand support for decarbonisation in supply chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Brand_support_for_decarbonisation_in_supply_chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Brand support for decarbonisation in supply chain",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how the brand is supporting its suppliers with operational expenses (OpEx) required to meet brand supply chain decarbonisation targets, particularly in transitioning to renewable energy and electrification?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "Operational expenses (OpEx), such as increased energy costs, can significantly impact and burden suppliers when transitioning to renewable energy. For example, renewable electricity costs significantly more than coal in some regions. To enable a just transition, brands should show they are willing to cover these higher costs by including them in the prices they pay for products or by directly helping to pay for them.<br>\n<br>\nBrands could disclose:<br>\n- A commitment to absorb the increased operational costs (e.g. higher electricity prices from renewable energy use) in purchasing prices <br>\n- Specific examples of how OpEx support is being provided, including the regions or suppliers involved.<br>\n- How the brand plans to subsidise increased OpEx e.g. brand pays the difference between coal-based electricity and renewable energy costs for 5 years to help suppliers transition or the brand gives suppliers a fixed yearly payment to offset renewable energy costs like maintenance and tariffs.<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Brand support for decarbonisation in supply chain+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Brand_support_for_decarbonisation_in_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Brand_support_for_decarbonisation_in_supply_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22211218,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Investment in climate adaptation measures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Investment_in_climate_adaptation_measures.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Investment in climate adaptation measures",
      "question": "Does the company disclose brand investment in capital expenditures (CapEx) for climate adaptation measures, such as installing air conditioning or other cooling systems to mitigate heat stress in supply chain facilities and flood defenses?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. \r<br>\n\r<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "As climate change increases the frequency and severity of heatwaves, brands must take action to protect workers in their supply chains from heat stress. Installing air conditioning or other cooling systems in facilities is crucial for safeguarding worker health and safety. Brands should disclose their investments in climate adaptation measures, including the installation of cooling systems in factories.<br>\n<br>\nBrands should disclose:<br>\n<br>\n- Total investment in climate adaptation measures, particularly cooling systems, to mitigate heat stress.<br>\n- The geographic regions and/or named facilities where these adaptations have been implemented.<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Investment in climate adaptation measures+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Investment_in_climate_adaptation_measures+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Investment_in_climate_adaptation_measures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22211229,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Progress against Renewable Electricity Target (Supply Chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Progress_against_Renewable_Electricity_Target_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Progress against Renewable Electricity Target (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "Does the company report progress against renewable electricity targets (Supply Chain)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "What Fuels Fashion?’ is a special edition report of the Global Fashion Transparency Index. It has been designed to measure transparency of brand disclosure about climate and energy-related data in their own operations and supply chains. The research is broken down into five key themes, including: Accountability, Decarbonisation, Energy Procurement, Financing Decarbonisation and Just Transition and Advocacy. <br>\n<br>\n200 of the world's largest fashion brands have been selected based on their annual turnover, over $1 billion USD and representing a spread of market segments including high street, luxury, sportswear, accessories, footwear and denim from across Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Africa. Where brands are privately held, estimates have been made regarding their size and turnover. Geographic spread is considered too.",
      "methodology": "Progress should be demonstrated through publicly disclosed strategies or actions that support the use of renewable electricity in the supply chain. This may include evidence of a structured approach that prioritizes local and/or additional renewable energy procurement, such as:<br>\n- Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) or Virtual Power Purchase Agreements (VPPAs)<br>\n- Contracts with energy suppliers<br>\n- On-site renewable energy generation<br>\n<br>\nTo be considered progress, disclosures should include details on:<br>\n- The type of renewable electricity procurement method (e.g., PPA, utility contract)<br>\n- The location of renewable electricity generation for each method<br>\n- The volume of electricity procured through each method<br>\n- For PPAs, whether associated certificates (e.g., RECs/EACs) are bundled, unbundled, or canceled<br>\n- Any mandatory renewable electricity requirements for suppliers, such as setting targets or meeting specific thresholds<br>\n<br>\nWe only award points for publicly disclosed information on the brand or parent company's own website. This means information disclosed on:<br>\n • Sustainability/CR microsite, provided there is a direct web link to it from the main brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In annual reports or annual sustainability/CSR reports (only counted if dated January 2023 or later) published on the brand or parent company website;<br>\n • In any other documents which are publicly available and can be downloaded freely from the brands' website; or<br>\n • Via external, third party websites but only when there is a direct web link from the brand or parent company's website to the third party website (e.g. Bangladesh Accord, Better Work, CDP, FLA, ETI, BSCI/amfori websites) where specific disclosures can be found.<br>\n<br>\nThe methodology is based on existing international standards and benchmarks such as: SDGs, ETI Base Code, UNGPs, OECD Due Diligence Guidelines, Fair Labor Association’s Freedom of Association guidelines, the GhG Protocol, CDP, Climate Action 100+ among others. It has also been developed to align with other industry benchmarks and relevant initiatives including the Transparency Pledge, Corporate Human Rights Benchmark, the Open Data Standard for the Apparel Sector and the World Benchmarking Alliance.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fashion Revolution+Progress against Renewable Electricity Target (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Progress_against_Renewable_Electricity_Target_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Progress_against_Renewable_Electricity_Target_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22220013,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+SIC Code",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+SIC_Code.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "SIC Code",
      "question": "What is the company’s SIC code?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The <strong>Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)</strong> is a system for classifying industries by a four-digit code as a method of standardizing industry classification for statistical purposes across agencies. Established in the United States in 1937, it is used by government agencies to classify industry areas. Similar SIC systems are also used by agencies in other countries, e.g., by the United Kingdom's Companies House.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": "{\"Agricultural Production-Crops\": \"0100\", \r\n\"Agricultural Prod-Livestock & Animal Specialties\": \"0200\", \r\n\"Agricultural Services\": \"0700\", \r\n\"Forestry\": \"0800\", \r\n\"Fishing, Hunting And Trapping\": \"0900\", \r\n\"Metal Mining\": \"1000\", \r\n\"Gold And Silver Ores\": \"1040\", \r\n\"Miscellaneous Metal Ores\": \"1090\", \r\n\"Bituminous Coal & Lignite Mining\": \"1220\", \r\n\"Bituminous Coal & Lignite Surface Mining\": \"1221\", \r\n\"Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas\": \"1311\", \r\n\"Drilling Oil & Gas Wells\": \"1381\", \r\n\"Oil & Gas Field Exploration Services\": \"1382\", \r\n\"Oil & Gas Field Services, Nec\": \"1389\", \r\n\"Mining & Quarrying Of Nonmetallic Minerals (No Fuels)\": \"1400\", \r\n\"General Bldg Contractors - Residential Bldgs\": \"1520\", \r\n\"Operative Builders\": \"1531\", \r\n\"General Bldg Contractors - Nonresidential Bldgs\": \"1540\", \r\n\"Heavy Construction Other Than Bldg Const - Contractors\": \"1600\", \r\n\"Water, Sewer, Pipeline, Comm & Power Line Construction\": \"1623\", \r\n\"Construction - Special Trade Contractors\": \"1700\", \r\n\"Electrical Work\": \"1731\", \r\n\"Food And Kindred Products\": \"2000\", \r\n\"Meat Packing Plants\": \"2011\", \r\n\"Sausages & Other Prepared Meat Products\": \"2013\", \r\n\"Poultry Slaughtering And Processing\": \"2015\", \r\n\"Dairy Products\": \"2020\", \r\n\"Ice Cream & Frozen Desserts\": \"2024\", \r\n\"Canned, Frozen & Preservd Fruit, Veg & Food Specialties\": \"2030\", \r\n\"Canned, Fruits, Veg, Preserves, Jams & Jellies\": \"2033\", \r\n\"Grain Mill Products\": \"2040\", \r\n\"Bakery Products\": \"2050\", \r\n\"Cookies & Crackers\": \"2052\", \r\n\"Sugar & Confectionery Products\": \"2060\", \r\n\"Fats & Oils\": \"2070\", \r\n\"Beverages\": \"2080\", \r\n\"Malt Beverages\": \"2082\", \r\n\"Bottled & Canned Soft Drinks & Carbonated Waters\": \"2086\", \r\n\"Miscellaneous Food Preparations & Kindred Products\": \"2090\", \r\n\"Prepared Fresh Or Frozen Fish & Seafoods\": \"2092\", \r\n\"Tobacco Products\": \"2100\", \r\n\"Cigarettes\": \"2111\", \r\n\"Textile Mill Products\": \"2200\", \r\n\"Broadwoven Fabric Mills, Cotton\": \"2211\", \r\n\"Broadwoven Fabric Mills, Man Made Fiber & Silk\": \"2221\", \r\n\"Knitting Mills\": \"2250\", \r\n\"Knit Outerwear Mills\": \"2253\", \r\n\"Carpets & Rugs\": \"2273\", \r\n\"Apparel & Other Finishd Prods Of Fabrics & Similar Matl\": \"2300\", \r\n\"Men's & Boys' Furnishgs, Work Clothg, & Allied Garments\": \"2320\", \r\n\"Women's, Misses', And Juniors Outerwear\": \"2330\", \r\n\"Women's, Misses', Children's & Infants' Undergarments\": \"2340\", \r\n\"Miscellaneous Fabricated Textile Products\": \"2390\", \r\n\"Lumber & Wood Products (No Furniture)\": \"2400\", \r\n\"Sawmills & Planting Mills, General\": \"2421\", \r\n\"Millwood, Veneer, Plywood, & Structural Wood Members\": \"2430\", \r\n\"Mobile Homes\": \"2451\", \r\n\"Prefabricated Wood Bldgs & Components\": \"2452\", \r\n\"Household Furniture\": \"2510\", \r\n\"Wood Household Furniture, (No Upholstered)\": \"2511\", \r\n\"Office Furniture\": \"2520\", \r\n\"Office Furniture (No Wood)\": \"2522\", \r\n\"Public Bldg & Related Furniture\": \"2531\", \r\n\"Partitions, Shelvg, Lockers, & Office & Store Fixtures\": \"2540\", \r\n\"Miscellaneous Furniture & Fixtures\": \"2590\", \r\n\"Papers & Allied Products\": \"2600\", \r\n\"Pulp Mills\": \"2611\", \r\n\"Paper Mills\": \"2621\", \r\n\"Paperboard Mills\": \"2631\", \r\n\"Paperboard Containers & Boxes\": \"2650\", \r\n\"Converted Paper & Paperboard Prods (No Contaners/Boxes)\": \"2670\", \r\n\"Plastics, Foil & Coated Paper Bags\": \"2673\", \r\n\"Newspapers: Publishing Or Publishing & Printing\": \"2711\", \r\n\"Periodicals: Publishing Or Publishing & Printing\": \"2721\", \r\n\"Books: Publishing Or Publishing & Printing\": \"2731\", \r\n\"Book Printing\": \"2732\", \r\n\"Miscellaneous Publishing\": \"2741\", \r\n\"Commercial Printing\": \"2750\", \r\n\"Manifold Business Forms\": \"2761\", \r\n\"Greeting Cards\": \"2771\", \r\n\"Blankbooks, Looseleaf Binders & Bookbindg & Relatd Work\": \"2780\", \r\n\"Service Industries For The Printing Trade\": \"2790\", \r\n\"Chemicals & Allied Products\": \"2800\", \r\n\"Industrial Inorganic Chemicals\": \"2810\", \r\n\"Plastic Material, Synth Resin/Rubber, Cellulos (No Glass)\": \"2820\", \r\n\"Plastic Materials, Synth Resins & Nonvulcan Elastomers\": \"2821\", \r\n\"Medicinal Chemicals & Botanical Products\": \"2833\", \r\n\"Pharmaceutical Preparations\": \"2834\", \r\n\"In Vitro & In Vivo Diagnostic Substances\": \"2835\", \r\n\"Biological Products, (No Disgnostic Substances)\": \"2836\", \r\n\"Soap, Detergents, Cleang Preparations, Perfumes, Cosmetics\": \"2840\", \r\n\"Specialty Cleaning, Polishing And Sanitation Preparations\": \"2842\", \r\n\"Perfumes, Cosmetics & Other Toilet Preparations\": \"2844\", \r\n\"Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels & Allied Prods\": \"2851\", \r\n\"Industrial Organic Chemicals\": \"2860\", \r\n\"Agricultural Chemicals\": \"2870\", \r\n\"Miscellaneous Chemical Products\": \"2890\", \r\n\"Adhesives & Sealants\": \"2891\", \r\n\"Petroleum Refining\": \"2911\", \r\n\"Asphalt Paving & Roofing Materials\": \"2950\", \r\n\"Miscellaneous Products Of Petroleum & Coal\": \"2990\", \r\n\"Tires & Inner Tubes\": \"3011\", \r\n\"Rubber & Plastics Footwear\": \"3021\", \r\n\"Gaskets, Packg & Sealg Devices & Rubber & Plastics Hose\": \"3050\", \r\n\"Fabricated Rubber Products, Nec\": \"3060\", \r\n\"Miscellaneous Plastics Products\": \"3080\", \r\n\"Unsupported Plastics Film & Sheet\": \"3081\", \r\n\"Plastics Foam Products\": \"3086\", \r\n\"Plastics Products, Nec\": \"3089\", \r\n\"Leather & Leather Products\": \"3100\", \r\n\"Footwear, (No Rubber)\": \"3140\", \r\n\"Flat Glass\": \"3211\", \r\n\"Glass & Glassware, Pressed Or Blown\": \"3220\", \r\n\"Glass Containers\": \"3221\", \r\n\"Glass Products, Made Of Purchased Glass\": \"3231\", \r\n\"Cement, Hydraulic\": \"3241\", \r\n\"Structural Clay Products\": \"3250\", \r\n\"Pottery & Related Products\": \"3260\", \r\n\"Concrete, Gypsum & Plaster Products\": \"3270\", \r\n\"Concrete Products, Except Block & Brick\": \"3272\", \r\n\"Cut Stone & Stone Products\": \"3281\", \r\n\"Abrasive, Asbestos & Misc Nonmetallic Mineral Prods\": \"3290\", \r\n\"Steel Works, Blast Furnaces & Rolling & Finishing Mills\": \"3310\", \r\n\"Steel Works, Blast Furnaces & Rolling Mills (Coke Ovens)\": \"3312\", \r\n\"Steel Pipe & Tubes\": \"3317\", \r\n\"Iron & Steel Foundries\": \"3320\", \r\n\"Primary Smelting & Refining Of Nonferrous Metals\": \"3330\", \r\n\"Primary Production Of Aluminum\": \"3334\", \r\n\"Secondary Smelting & Refining Of Nonferrous Metals\": \"3341\", \r\n\"Rolling Drawing & Extruding Of Nonferrous Metals\": \"3350\", \r\n\"Drawing & Insulating Of Nonferrous Wire\": \"3357\", \r\n\"Nonferrous Foundries (Castings)\": \"3360\", \r\n\"Miscellaneous Primary Metal Products\": \"3390\", \r\n\"Metal Cans\": \"3411\", \r\n\"Metal Shipping Barrels, Drums, Kegs & Pails\": \"3412\", \r\n\"Cutlery, Handtools & General Hardware\": \"3420\", \r\n\"Heating Equip, Except Elec & Warm Air; & Plumbing Fixtures\": \"3430\", \r\n\"Heating Equipment, Except Electric & Warm Air Furnaces\": \"3433\", \r\n\"Fabricated Structural Metal Products\": \"3440\", \r\n\"Metal Doors, Sash, Frames, Moldings & Trim\": \"3442\", \r\n\"Fabricated Plate Work (Boiler Shops)\": \"3443\", \r\n\"Sheet Metal Work\": \"3444\", \r\n\"Prefabricated Metal Buildings & Components\": \"3448\", \r\n\"Screw Machine Products\": \"3451\", \r\n\"Bolts, Nuts, Screws, Rivets & Washers\": \"3452\", \r\n\"Metal Forgings & Stampings\": \"3460\", \r\n\"Coating, Engraving & Allied Services\": \"3470\", \r\n\"Ordnance & Accessories, (No Vehicles/Guided Missiles)\": \"3480\", \r\n\"Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Products\": \"3490\", \r\n\"Engines & Turbines\": \"3510\", \r\n\"Farm Machinery & Equipment\": \"3523\", \r\n\"Lawn & Garden Tractors & Home Lawn & Gardens Equip\": \"3524\", \r\n\"Construction, Mining & Materials Handling Machinery & Equip\": \"3530\", \r\n\"Construction Machinery & Equip\": \"3531\", \r\n\"Mining Machinery & Equip (No Oil & Gas Field Mach & Equip)\": \"3532\", \r\n\"Oil & Gas Field Machinery & Equipment\": \"3533\", \r\n\"Industrial Trucks, Tractors, Trailors & Stackers\": \"3537\", \r\n\"Metalworkg Machinery & Equipment\": \"3540\", \r\n\"Machine Tools, Metal Cutting Types\": \"3541\", \r\n\"Special Industry Machinery (No Metalworking Machinery)\": \"3550\", \r\n\"Printing Trades Machinery & Equipment\": \"3555\", \r\n\"Special Industry Machinery, Nec\": \"3559\", \r\n\"General Industrial Machinery & Equipment\": \"3560\", \r\n\"Pumps & Pumping Equipment\": \"3561\", \r\n\"Ball & Roller Bearings\": \"3562\", \r\n\"Industrial & Commercial Fans & Blowers & Air Purifing Equip\": \"3564\", \r\n\"Industrial Process Furnaces & Ovens\": \"3567\", \r\n\"General Industrial Machinery & Equipment, Nec\": \"3569\", \r\n\"Computer & Office Equipment\": \"3570\", \r\n\"Electronic Computers\": \"3571\", \r\n\"Computer Storage Devices\": \"3572\", \r\n\"Computer Terminals\": \"3575\", \r\n\"Computer Communications Equipment\": \"3576\", \r\n\"Computer Peripheral Equipment, Nec\": \"3577\", \r\n\"Calculating & Accounting Machines (No Electronic Computers)\": \"3578\", \r\n\"Office Machines, Nec\": \"3579\", \r\n\"Refrigeration & Service Industry Machinery\": \"3580\", \r\n\"Air-Cond & Warm Air Heatg Equip & Comm & Indl Refrig Equip\": \"3585\", \r\n\"Misc Industrial & Commercial Machinery & Equipment\": \"3590\", \r\n\"Electronic & Other Electrical Equipment (No Computer Equip)\": \"3600\", \r\n\"Power, Distribution & Specialty Transformers\": \"3612\", \r\n\"Switchgear & Switchboard Apparatus\": \"3613\", \r\n\"Electrical Industrial Apparatus\": \"3620\", \r\n\"Motors & Generators\": \"3621\", \r\n\"Household Appliances\": \"3630\", \r\n\"Electric Housewares & Fans\": \"3634\", \r\n\"Electric Lighting & Wiring Equipment\": \"3640\", \r\n\"Household Audio & Video Equipment\": \"3651\", \r\n\"Phonograph Records & Prerecorded Audio Tapes & Disks\": \"3652\", \r\n\"Telephone & Telegraph Apparatus\": \"3661\", \r\n\"Radio & Tv Broadcasting & Communications Equipment\": \"3663\", \r\n\"Communications Equipment, Nec\": \"3669\", \r\n\"Electronic Components & Accessories\": \"3670\", \r\n\"Printed Circuit Boards\": \"3672\", \r\n\"Semiconductors & Related Devices\": \"3674\", \r\n\"Electronic Coils, Transformers & Other Inductors\": \"3677\", \r\n\"Electronic Connectors\": \"3678\", \r\n\"Electronic Components, Nec\": \"3679\", \r\n\"Miscellaneous Electrical Machinery, Equipment & Supplies\": \"3690\", \r\n\"Magnetic & Optical Recording Media\": \"3695\", \r\n\"Motor Vehicles & Passenger Car Bodies\": \"3711\", \r\n\"Truck & Bus Bodies\": \"3713\", \r\n\"Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories\": \"3714\", \r\n\"Truck Trailers\": \"3715\", \r\n\"Motor Homes\": \"3716\", \r\n\"Aircraft & Parts\": \"3720\", \r\n\"Aircraft\": \"3721\", \r\n\"Aircraft Engines & Engine Parts\": \"3724\", \r\n\"Aircraft Parts & Auxiliary Equipment, Nec\": \"3728\", \r\n\"Ship & Boat Building & Repairing\": \"3730\", \r\n\"Railroad Equipment\": \"3743\", \r\n\"Motorcycles, Bicycles & Parts\": \"3751\", \r\n\"Guided Missiles & Space Vehicles & Parts\": \"3760\", \r\n\"Miscellaneous Transportation Equipment\": \"3790\", \r\n\"Search, Detection, Navagation, Guidance, Aeronautical Sys\": \"3812\", \r\n\"Laboratory Apparatus & Furniture\": \"3821\", \r\n\"Auto Controls For Regulating Residential & Comml Environments\": \"3822\", \r\n\"Industrial Instruments For Measurement, Display, And Control\": \"3823\", \r\n\"Totalizing Fluid Meters & Counting Devices\": \"3824\", \r\n\"Instruments For Meas & Testing Of Electricity & Elec Signals\": \"3825\", \r\n\"Laboratory Analytical Instruments\": \"3826\", \r\n\"Optical Instruments & Lenses\": \"3827\", \r\n\"Measuring & Controlling Devices, Nec\": \"3829\", \r\n\"Surgical & Medical Instruments & Apparatus\": \"3841\", \r\n\"Orthopedic, Prosthetic & Surgical Appliances & Supplies\": \"3842\", \r\n\"Dental Equipment & Supplies\": \"3843\", \r\n\"X-Ray Apparatus & Tubes & Related Irradiation Apparatus\": \"3844\", \r\n\"Electromedical & Electrotherapeutic Apparatus\": \"3845\", \r\n\"Ophthalmic Goods\": \"3851\", \r\n\"Photographic Equipment & Supplies\": \"3861\", \r\n\"Watches, Clocks, Clockwork Operated Devices/Parts\": \"3873\", \r\n\"Jewelry, Silverware & Plated Ware\": \"3910\", \r\n\"Jewelry, Precious Metal\": \"3911\", \r\n\"Musical Instruments\": \"3931\", \r\n\"Dolls & Stuffed Toys\": \"3942\", \r\n\"Games, Toys & Children's Vehicles (No Dolls & Bicycles)\": \"3944\", \r\n\"Sporting & Athletic Goods, Nec\": \"3949\", \r\n\"Pens, Pencils & Other Artists' Materials\": \"3950\", \r\n\"Costume Jewelry & Novelties\": \"3960\", \r\n\"Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries\": \"3990\", \r\n\"Railroads, Line-Haul Operating\": \"4011\", \r\n\"Railroad Switching & Terminal Establishments\": \"4013\", \r\n\"Local & Suburban Transit & Interurban Hwy Passenger Trans\": \"4100\", \r\n\"Trucking & Courier Services (No Air)\": \"4210\", \r\n\"Trucking (No Local)\": \"4213\", \r\n\"Public Warehousing & Storage\": \"4220\", \r\n\"Terminal Maintenance Facilities For Motor Freight Transport\": \"4231\", \r\n\"Water Transportation\": \"4400\", \r\n\"Deep Sea Foreign Transportation Of Freight\": \"4412\", \r\n\"Air Transportation, Scheduled\": \"4512\", \r\n\"Air Courier Services\": \"4513\", \r\n\"Air Transportation, Nonscheduled\": \"4522\", \r\n\"Airports, Flying Fields & Airport Terminal Services\": \"4581\", \r\n\"Pipe Lines (No Natural Gas)\": \"4610\", \r\n\"Transportation Services\": \"4700\", \r\n\"Arrangement Of Transportation Of Freight & Cargo\": \"4731\", \r\n\"Radiotelephone Communications\": \"4812\", \r\n\"Telephone Communications (No Radiotelephone)\": \"4813\", \r\n\"Telegraph & Other Message Communications\": \"4822\", \r\n\"Radio Broadcasting Stations\": \"4832\", \r\n\"Television Broadcasting Stations\": \"4833\", \r\n\"Cable & Other Pay Television Services\": \"4841\", \r\n\"Communications Services, Nec\": \"4899\", \r\n\"Electric, Gas & Sanitary Services\": \"4900\", \r\n\"Electric Services\": \"4911\", \r\n\"Natural Gas Transmission\": \"4922\", \r\n\"Natural Gas Transmisison & Distribution\": \"4923\", \r\n\"Natural Gas Distribution\": \"4924\", \r\n\"Electric & Other Services Combined\": \"4931\", \r\n\"Gas & Other Services Combined\": \"4932\", \r\n\"Water Supply\": \"4941\", \r\n\"Sanitary Services\": \"4950\", \r\n\"Refuse Systems\": \"4953\", \r\n\"Hazardous Waste Management\": \"4955\", \r\n\"Steam & Air-Conditioning Supply\": \"4961\", \r\n\"Cogeneration Services & Small Power Producers\": \"4991\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Durable Goods\": \"5000\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Motor Vehicles & Motor Vehicle Parts & Supplies\": \"5010\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Motor Vehicle Supplies & New Parts\": \"5013\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Furniture & Home Furnishings\": \"5020\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Lumber & Other Construction Materials\": \"5030\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Lumber, Plywood, Millwork & Wood Panels\": \"5031\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Professional & Commercial Equipment & Supplies\": \"5040\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Computers & Peripheral Equipment & Software\": \"5045\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Medical, Dental & Hospital Equipment & Supplies\": \"5047\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Metals & Minerals (No Petroleum)\": \"5050\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Metals Service Centers & Offices\": \"5051\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Electrical Apparatus & Equipment, Wiring Supplies\": \"5063\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Electrical Appliances, Tv & Radio Sets\": \"5064\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Electronic Parts & Equipment, Nec\": \"5065\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Hardware & Plumbing & Heating Equipment & Supplies\": \"5070\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Hardware\": \"5072\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Machinery, Equipment & Supplies\": \"5080\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Construction & Mining (No Petro) Machinery & Equip\": \"5082\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Industrial Machinery & Equipment\": \"5084\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Misc Durable Goods\": \"5090\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Jewelry, Watches, Precious Stones & Metals\": \"5094\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Durable Goods, Nec\": \"5099\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Paper & Paper Products\": \"5110\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Drugs, Proprietaries & Druggists' Sundries\": \"5122\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Apparel, Piece Goods & Notions\": \"5130\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Groceries & Related Products\": \"5140\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Groceries, General Line\": \"5141\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Farm Product Raw Materials\": \"5150\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Chemicals & Allied Products\": \"5160\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Petroleum Bulk Stations & Terminals\": \"5171\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Petroleum & Petroleum Products (No Bulk Stations)\": \"5172\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Beer, Wine & Distilled Alcoholic Beverages\": \"5180\", \r\n\"Wholesale-Miscellaneous Nondurable Goods\": \"5190\", \r\n\"Retail-Building Materials, Hardware, Garden Supply\": \"5200\", \r\n\"Retail-Lumber & Other Building Materials Dealers\": \"5211\", \r\n\"Retail-Mobile Home Dealers\": \"5271\", \r\n\"Retail-Department Stores\": \"5311\", \r\n\"Retail-Variety Stores\": \"5331\", \r\n\"Retail-Misc General Merchandise Stores\": \"5399\", \r\n\"Retail-Food Stores\": \"5400\", \r\n\"Retail-Grocery Stores\": \"5411\", \r\n\"Retail-Convenience Stores\": \"5412\", \r\n\"Retail-Auto Dealers & Gasoline Stations\": \"5500\", \r\n\"Retail-Auto & Home Supply Stores\": \"5531\", \r\n\"Retail-Apparel & Accessory Stores\": \"5600\", \r\n\"Retail-Women's Clothing Stores\": \"5621\", \r\n\"Retail-Family Clothing Stores\": \"5651\", \r\n\"Retail-Shoe Stores\": \"5661\", \r\n\"Retail-Home Furniture, Furnishings & Equipment Stores\": \"5700\", \r\n\"Retail-Furniture Stores\": \"5712\", \r\n\"Retail-Radio, Tv & Consumer Electronics Stores\": \"5731\", \r\n\"Retail-Computer & Computer Software Stores\": \"5734\", \r\n\"Retail-Record & Prerecorded Tape Stores\": \"5735\", \r\n\"Retail-Eating & Drinking Places\": \"5810\", \r\n\"Retail-Eating Places\": \"5812\", \r\n\"Retail-Miscellaneous Retail\": \"5900\", \r\n\"Retail-Drug Stores And Proprietary Stores\": \"5912\", \r\n\"Retail-Miscellaneous Shopping Goods Stores\": \"5940\", \r\n\"Retail-Jewelry Stores\": \"5944\", \r\n\"Retail-Hobby, Toy & Game Shops\": \"5945\", \r\n\"Retail-Nonstore Retailers\": \"5960\", \r\n\"Retail-Catalog & Mail-Order Houses\": \"5961\", \r\n\"Retail-Retail Stores, Nec\": \"5990\", \r\n\"National Commercial Banks\": \"6021\", \r\n\"State Commercial Banks\": \"6022\", \r\n\"Commercial Banks, Nec\": \"6029\", \r\n\"Savings Institution, Federally Chartered\": \"6035\", \r\n\"Savings Institutions, Not Federally Chartered\": \"6036\", \r\n\"Functions Related To Depository Banking, Nec\": \"6099\", \r\n\"Federal & Federally-Sponsored Credit Agencies\": \"6111\", \r\n\"Personal Credit Institutions\": \"6141\", \r\n\"Short-Term Business Credit Institutions\": \"6153\", \r\n\"Miscellaneous Business Credit Institution\": \"6159\", \r\n\"Mortgage Bankers & Loan Correspondents\": \"6162\", \r\n\"Loan Brokers\": \"6163\", \r\n\"Finance Lessors\": \"6172\", \r\n\"Asset-Backed Securities\": \"6189\", \r\n\"Finance Services\": \"6199\", \r\n\"Security & Commodity Brokers, Dealers, Exchanges & Services\": \"6200\", \r\n\"Security Brokers, Dealers & Flotation Companies\": \"6211\", \r\n\"Commodity Contracts Brokers & Dealers\": \"6221\", \r\n\"Investment Advice\": \"6282\", \r\n\"Life Insurance\": \"6311\", \r\n\"Accident & Health Insurance\": \"6321\", \r\n\"Hospital & Medical Service Plans\": \"6324\", \r\n\"Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance\": \"6331\", \r\n\"Surety Insurance\": \"6351\", \r\n\"Title Insurance\": \"6361\", \r\n\"Insurance Carriers, Nec\": \"6399\", \r\n\"Insurance Agents, Brokers & Service\": \"6411\", \r\n\"Real Estate\": \"6500\", \r\n\"Real Estate Operators (No Developers) & Lessors\": \"6510\", \r\n\"Operators Of Nonresidential Buildings\": \"6512\", \r\n\"Operators Of Apartment Buildings\": \"6513\", \r\n\"Lessors Of Real Property, Nec\": \"6519\", \r\n\"Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others)\": \"6531\", \r\n\"Real Estate Dealers (For Their Own Account)\": \"6532\", \r\n\"Land Subdividers & Developers (No Cemeteries)\": \"6552\", \r\n\"Blank Checks\": \"6770\", \r\n\"Oil Royalty Traders\": \"6792\", \r\n\"Patent Owners & Lessors\": \"6794\", \r\n\"Mineral Royalty Traders\": \"6795\", \r\n\"Real Estate Investment Trusts\": \"6798\", \r\n\"Investors, Nec\": \"6799\", \r\n\"Hotels, Rooming Houses, Camps & Other Lodging Places\": \"7000\", \r\n\"Hotels & Motels\": \"7011\", \r\n\"Services-Personal Services\": \"7200\", \r\n\"Services-Advertising\": \"7310\", \r\n\"Services-Advertising Agencies\": \"7311\", \r\n\"Services-Consumer Credit Reporting, Collection Agencies\": \"7320\", \r\n\"Services-Mailing, Reproduction, Commercial Art & Photography\": \"7330\", \r\n\"Services-Direct Mail Advertising Services\": \"7331\", \r\n\"Services-To Dwellings & Other Buildings\": \"7340\", \r\n\"Services-Miscellaneous Equipment Rental & Leasing\": \"7350\", \r\n\"Services-Equipment Rental & Leasing, Nec\": \"7359\", \r\n\"Services-Employment Agencies\": \"7361\", \r\n\"Services-Help Supply Services\": \"7363\", \r\n\"Services-Computer Programming, Data Processing, Etc.\": \"7370\", \r\n\"Services-Computer Programming Services\": \"7371\", \r\n\"Services-Prepackaged Software\": \"7372\", \r\n\"Services-Computer Integrated Systems Design\": \"7373\", \r\n\"Services-Computer Processing & Data Preparation\": \"7374\", \r\n\"Services-Computer Rental & Leasing\": \"7377\", \r\n\"Services-Miscellaneous Business Services\": \"7380\", \r\n\"Services-Detective, Guard & Armored Car Services\": \"7381\", \r\n\"Services-Photofinishing Laboratories\": \"7384\", \r\n\"Services-Telephone Interconnect Systems\": \"7385\", \r\n\"Services-Business Services, Nec\": \"7389\", \r\n\"Services-Automotive Repair, Services & Parking\": \"7500\", \r\n\"Services-Auto Rental & Leasing (No Drivers)\": \"7510\", \r\n\"Services-Miscellaneous Repair Services\": \"7600\", \r\n\"Services-Motion Picture & Video Tape Production\": \"7812\", \r\n\"Services-Allied To Motion Picture Production\": \"7819\", \r\n\"Services-Motion Picture & Video Tape Distribution\": \"7822\", \r\n\"Services-Allied To Motion Picture Distribution\": \"7829\", \r\n\"Services-Motion Picture Theaters\": \"7830\", \r\n\"Services-Video Tape Rental\": \"7841\", \r\n\"Services-Amusement & Recreation Services\": \"7900\", \r\n\"Services-Racing, Including Track Operation\": \"7948\", \r\n\"Services-Miscellaneous Amusement & Recreation\": \"7990\", \r\n\"Services-Membership Sports & Recreation Clubs\": \"7997\", \r\n\"Services-Health Services\": \"8000\", \r\n\"Services-Offices & Clinics Of Doctors Of Medicine\": \"8011\", \r\n\"Services-Nursing & Personal Care Facilities\": \"8050\", \r\n\"Services-Skilled Nursing Care Facilities\": \"8051\", \r\n\"Services-Hospitals\": \"8060\", \r\n\"Services-General Medical & Surgical Hospitals, Nec\": \"8062\", \r\n\"Services-Medical Laboratories\": \"8071\", \r\n\"Services-Home Health Care Services\": \"8082\", \r\n\"Services-Misc Health & Allied Services, Nec\": \"8090\", \r\n\"Services-Specialty Outpatient Facilities, Nec\": \"8093\", \r\n\"Services-Legal Services\": \"8111\", \r\n\"Services-Educational Services\": \"8200\", \r\n\"Services-Social Services\": \"8300\", \r\n\"Services-Child Day Care Services\": \"8351\", \r\n\"Services-Membership Organizations\": \"8600\", \r\n\"Services-Engineering, Accounting, Research, Management\": \"8700\", \r\n\"Services-Engineering Services\": \"8711\", \r\n\"Services-Commercial Physical & Biological Research\": \"8731\", \r\n\"Services-Testing Laboratories\": \"8734\", \r\n\"Services-Management Services\": \"8741\", \r\n\"Services-Management Consulting Services\": \"8742\", \r\n\"Services-Facilities Support Management Services\": \"8744\", \r\n\"American Depositary Receipts\": \"8880\", \r\n\"Foreign Governments\": \"8888\", \r\n\"Services-Services, Nec\": \"8900\", \r\n\"International Affairs\": \"9721\", \r\n\"Non-Operating Establishment\": \"9995\"}",
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6427,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6427,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Industry_SIC_Major_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+SIC_Code+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22245768,
      "name": "US Securities and Exchange Commission+Industry (SIC Major Group)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Industry_SIC_Major_Group.json",
      "designer": "US Securities and Exchange Commission",
      "title": "Industry (SIC Major Group)",
      "question": "What is the company’s SIC Major Group (2-digit category) based on its SIC code",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": "<p>This metric maps a company’s Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code to its Major Group (2-digit) category. SIC codes are a U.S. government industry classification system maintained by the U.S. Department of Labor and used by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in company filings. The Major Group provides a higher-level categorization than the detailed 4-digit SIC code (e.g., “3674 - Semiconductors &amp; Related Devices” maps to Major Group “36 - Electronic and Other Electrical Equipment and Components”)</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": "{\"Agricultural Production Crops\":\"01\",\r\n\"Agriculture Production Livestock And Animal Specialties\":\"02\",\r\n\"Agricultural Services\":\"07\",\r\n\"Forestry\":\"08\",\r\n\"Fishing, Hunting, And Trapping\":\"09\",\r\n\"Metal Mining\":\"10\",\r\n\"Coal Mining\":\"12\",\r\n\"Oil And Gas Extraction\":\"13\",\r\n\"Mining And Quarrying Of Nonmetallic Minerals, Except Fuels\":\"14\",\r\n\"Building Construction General Contractors And Operative Builders\":\"15\",\r\n\"Heavy Construction Other Than Building Construction Contractors\":\"16\",\r\n\"Construction Special Trade Contractors\":\"17\",\r\n\"Food And Kindred Products\":\"20\",\r\n\"Tobacco Products\":\"21\",\r\n\"Textile Mill Products\":\"22\",\r\n\"Apparel And Other Finished Products Made From Fabrics And Similar Materials\":\"23\",\r\n\"Lumber And Wood Products, Except Furniture\":\"24\",\r\n\"Furniture And Fixtures\":\"25\",\r\n\"Paper And Allied Products\":\"26\",\r\n\"Printing, Publishing, And Allied Industries\":\"27\",\r\n\"Chemicals And Allied Products\":\"28\",\r\n\"Petroleum Refining And Related Industries\":\"29\",\r\n\"Rubber And Miscellaneous Plastics Products\":\"30\",\r\n\"Leather And Leather Products\":\"31\",\r\n\"Stone, Clay, Glass, And Concrete Products\":\"32\",\r\n\"Primary Metal Industries\":\"33\",\r\n\"Fabricated Metal Products, Except Machinery And Transportation Equipment\":\"34\",\r\n\"Industrial And Commercial Machinery And Computer Equipment\":\"35\",\r\n\"Electronic And Other Electrical Equipment And Components, Except Computer Equipment\":\"36\",\r\n\"Transportation Equipment\":\"37\",\r\n\"Measuring, Analyzing, And Controlling Instruments; Photographic, Medical And Optical Goods; Watches And Clocks\":\"38\",\r\n\"Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries\":\"39\",\r\n\"Railroad Transportation\":\"40\",\r\n\"Local And Suburban Transit And Interurban Highway Passenger Transportation\":\"41\",\r\n\"Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing\":\"42\",\r\n\"United States Postal Service\":\"43\",\r\n\"Water Transportation\":\"44\",\r\n\"Transportation By Air\":\"45\",\r\n\"Pipelines, Except Natural Gas\":\"46\",\r\n\"Transportation Services\":\"47\",\r\n\"Communications\":\"48\",\r\n\"Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services\":\"49\",\r\n\"Wholesale Trade-durable Goods\":\"50\",\r\n\"Wholesale Trade-non-durable Goods\":\"51\",\r\n\"Building Materials, Hardware, Garden Supply, And Mobile Home Dealers\":\"52\",\r\n\"General Merchandise Stores\":\"53\",\r\n\"Food Stores\":\"54\",\r\n\"Automotive Dealers And Gasoline Service Stations\":\"55\",\r\n\"Apparel And Accessory Stores\":\"56\",\r\n\"Home Furniture, Furnishings, And Equipment Stores\":\"57\",\r\n\"Eating And Drinking Places\":\"58\",\r\n\"Miscellaneous Retail\":\"59\",\r\n\"Depository Institutions\":\"60\",\r\n\"Non-depository Credit Institutions\":\"61\",\r\n\"Security And Commodity Brokers, Dealers, Exchanges, And Services\":\"62\",\r\n\"Insurance Carriers\":\"63\",\r\n\"Insurance Agents, Brokers, And Service\":\"64\",\r\n\"Real Estate\":\"65\",\r\n\"Holding And Other Investment Offices\":\"67\",\r\n\"Hotels, Rooming Houses, Camps, And Other Lodging Places\":\"70\",\r\n\"Personal Services\":\"72\",\r\n\"Business Services\":\"73\",\r\n\"Automotive Repair, Services, And Parking\":\"75\",\r\n\"Miscellaneous Repair Services\":\"76\",\r\n\"Motion Pictures\":\"78\",\r\n\"Amusement And Recreation Services\":\"79\",\r\n\"Health Services\":\"80\",\r\n\"Legal Services\":\"81\",\r\n\"Educational Services\":\"82\",\r\n\"Social Services\":\"83\",\r\n\"Museums, Art Galleries, And Botanical And Zoological Gardens\":\"84\",\r\n\"Membership Organizations\":\"86\",\r\n\"Engineering, Accounting, Research, Management, And Related Services\":\"87\",\r\n\"Private Households\":\"88\",\r\n\"Miscellaneous Services\":\"89\",\r\n\"Executive, Legislative, And General Government, Except Finance\":\"91\",\r\n\"Justice, Public Order, And Safety\":\"92\",\r\n\"Public Finance, Taxation, And Monetary Policy\":\"93\",\r\n\"Administration Of Human Resource Programs\":\"94\",\r\n\"Administration Of Environmental Quality And Housing Programs\":\"95\",\r\n\"Administration Of Economic Programs\":\"96\",\r\n\"National Security And International Affairs\":\"97\",\r\n\"Nonclassifiable Establishments\":\"99\"}",
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var groups;\n\n  groups = sic_codes.map(function(c) {\n    return String(c).slice(0, 2);\n  });\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22220013",
          "name": "sic_codes"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 6427,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 6427,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/US_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission+Industry_SIC_Major_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22245823,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Antwerp Declaration Signatory",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Antwerp_Declaration_Signatory.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Antwerp Declaration Signatory",
      "question": "Did the company sign the Antwerp Declaration for a European Industrial Deal?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic) is the influential association of the European chemical industry. Its 650 members include major corporations such as Bayer, BASF, and BP, as well as national trade associations such as the German Chemical Industry Association (VCI). The association is regularly led by the heads of major chemical companies, and more frequently by the CEO of BASF.</p>\r\n<p>In February 2024, Cefic hosted a chemicals summit with Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo. The \"Antwerp Declaration for a European Industrial Deal\" was adopted at the BASF site in Antwerp. As a counterpoint to the Green Deal, this EU Industrial Deal calls, among other things, for far-reaching and rapid deregulation under the guise of competitiveness and innovation, including the dismantling of existing social and environmental regulations. It also aims to make the future development and implementation of effective regulations more difficult.</p>\r\n<p>There was strong <a href=\"https://www.lobbycontrol.de/lobbyismus-in-der-eu/interessenkonflikte-in-der-eu-wettbewerbsbehoerde-die-fusion-bayer-und-monsanto-114472/\">protest</a> against this. In an <a href=\"https://corporateeurope.org/en/2024/06/prioritise-people-environment\">open letter</a> shortly after the election, more than 120 organizations called on the EU to abandon these plans.</p>\r\n<p>Source: Automated translation from <a href=\"https://www.lobbycontrol.de/lobbyismus-in-der-eu/neue-eu-kommission-vorfahrt-fuer-konzerne-116259/\">https://www.lobbycontrol.de/lobbyismus-in-der-eu/neue-eu-kommission-vorfahrt-fuer-konzerne-116259/</a> </p>\r\n<p>The undersigned companies and organisations express their full support for a European Industrial Deal to complement the Green Deal and keep high quality jobs for European workers in Europe.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://antwerp-declaration.eu/signatories\">https://antwerp-declaration.eu/signatories</a> </p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Check on the Antwerp Declaration website whether the company in question has signed on: <a href=\"https://antwerp-declaration.eu/signatories\">https://antwerp-declaration.eu/signatories</a> </p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Standard",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Antwerp_Declaration_Signatory+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22248054,
      "name": "GreenDex+UNGC Communication on Progress Reporting Level",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+UNGC_Communication_on_Progress_Reporting_Level.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "UNGC Communication on Progress Reporting Level",
      "question": "What level of reporting does a company have according to the UN Global Compact's standards (Learner, Active, Advanced, or Not Listed)?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": "<p>The Communication on Progress Report (COP) is an annual effort submitted by companies about their efforts to implement the principles of the UN Global Compact. Companies whose COP reports do not meet the UN Global Compact's minimum requirements receive the <strong>Beginner</strong> level.</p>\r\n<p>Companies whose reports meet all of the minimum requirements receive the <strong>Active</strong> level.</p>\r\n<p>Companies that meet the minimum requirements and also cover the company’s implementation of advanced criteria and best practices receive the <strong>Advanced</strong> level.</p>\r\n<p>Companies that have been confirmed to have not submitted a progress report for the year specified are marked as <strong>Not Listed</strong>.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric descends fom UN Global Compact, allowing for community research and adding the ability for companies to be marked as Not Listed.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "GC Learner",
        "GC Active",
        "GC Advanced",
        "Not Listed"
      ],
      "report_type": "Communication on Progress",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~413415"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 5109,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1118,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+UNGC_Communication_on_Progress_Reporting_Level+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253766,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.1 Governance (revised)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_1_Governance_revised.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.1 Governance (revised)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19575311",
          "weight": 40
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575318",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575486",
          "weight": 40
        }
      ],
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Accountability_Score_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_1_Governance_revised+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253784,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Proportion of the supply chain that the brand directly owns or controls at finished product manufacturing factories+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Proportion_of_the_supply_chain_that_the_brand_directly_owns_or_controls_at_finished_product_manufacturing_factories+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Proportion of the supply chain that the brand directly owns or controls at finished product manufacturing factories",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 204,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 204,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Proportion_of_the_supply_chain_that_the_brand_directly_owns_or_controls_at_finished_product_manufacturing_factories+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253789,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Weekly or monthly take-home wage for entry-level workers+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Weekly_or_monthly_take_home_wage_for_entry_level_workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Weekly or monthly take-home wage for entry-level workers",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 204,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 204,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Weekly_or_monthly_take_home_wage_for_entry_level_workers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253802,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Proportion of the supply chain that the brand directly owns or controls at intermediate material processing & material manufacturing level+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Proportion_of_the_supply_chain_that_the_brand_directly_owns_or_controls_at_intermediate_material_processing_material_manufacturing_level+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Proportion of the supply chain that the brand directly owns or controls at intermediate material processing & material manufacturing level",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 204,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 204,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Proportion_of_the_supply_chain_that_the_brand_directly_owns_or_controls_at_intermediate_material_processing_material_manufacturing_level+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253827,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.2 Traceability (revised)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.2 Traceability (revised)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19689863",
          "weight": 3.57
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689868",
          "weight": 3.57
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689872",
          "weight": 3.57
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689876",
          "weight": 3.57
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689880",
          "weight": 1.79
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689884",
          "weight": 5.36
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22253784",
          "weight": 7.14
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689888",
          "weight": 7.14
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689892",
          "weight": 7.14
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689896",
          "weight": 7.14
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689900",
          "weight": 3.57
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689904",
          "weight": 1.79
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689908",
          "weight": 5.36
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22253802",
          "weight": 7.14
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689912",
          "weight": 7.14
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689916",
          "weight": 7.14
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689920",
          "weight": 7.14
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689924",
          "weight": 3.57
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689928",
          "weight": 1.79
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19689932",
          "weight": 5.36
        }
      ],
      "answer": 204,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 204,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Accountability_Score_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_2_Traceability_revised+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253872,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1.3 Overproduction",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Overproduction.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1.3 Overproduction",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~5954852",
          "weight": 44.45
        },
        {
          "metric": "~15366357",
          "weight": 55.55
        }
      ],
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Accountability_Score_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_3_Overproduction+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253883,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+1. Accountability Score (revised)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Accountability_Score_revised.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "1. Accountability Score (revised)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22253766",
          "weight": 11.9
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22253827",
          "weight": 66.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22253872",
          "weight": 21.43
        }
      ],
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2025.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+1_Accountability_Score_revised+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253918,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Long-term (2040-2050) science-based targets+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Long_term_2040_2050_science_based_targets+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Long-term (2040-2050) science-based targets",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Long_term_2040_2050_science_based_targets+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253925,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Strategy or efforts to electrify supply chain manufacturing processes+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Strategy_or_efforts_to_electrify_supply_chain_manufacturing_processes+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Strategy or efforts to electrify supply chain manufacturing processes",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Strategy_or_efforts_to_electrify_supply_chain_manufacturing_processes+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253930,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Target to phase-out combustion of coal on-site at finished garment manufacturing factories+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Target_to_phase_out_combustion_of_coal_on_site_at_finished_garment_manufacturing_factories+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Target to phase-out combustion of coal on-site at finished garment manufacturing factories",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Target_to_phase_out_combustion_of_coal_on_site_at_finished_garment_manufacturing_factories+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253935,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Target to phase-out combustion of coal on-site at material processing/manufacturing facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Target_to_phase_out_combustion_of_coal_on_site_at_material_processing_manufacturing_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Target to phase-out combustion of coal on-site at material processing/manufacturing facilities",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Target_to_phase_out_combustion_of_coal_on_site_at_material_processing_manufacturing_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253940,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Coal phase-out target specify the percentage of total production volume it applies to+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Coal_phase_out_target_specify_the_percentage_of_total_production_volume_it_applies_to+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Coal phase-out target specify the percentage of total production volume it applies to",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Coal_phase_out_target_specify_the_percentage_of_total_production_volume_it_applies_to+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253945,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Coal-phase-out target include purchased steam+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Coal_phase_out_target_include_purchased_steam+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Coal-phase-out target include purchased steam",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Coal_phase_out_target_include_purchased_steam+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253950,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Progress against the coal-phase out target in the supply chain+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Progress_against_the_coal_phase_out_target_in_the_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Progress against the coal-phase out target in the supply chain",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Progress_against_the_coal_phase_out_target_in_the_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253955,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Progress against Renewable Electricity Target (Supply Chain)+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Progress_against_Renewable_Electricity_Target_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Progress against Renewable Electricity Target (Supply Chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Progress_against_Renewable_Electricity_Target_Supply_Chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253961,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2.1 Decarbonisation (revised)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation_revised.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2.1 Decarbonisation (revised)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7606567",
          "weight": 5.26
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22253918",
          "weight": 5.26
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7606576",
          "weight": 5.26
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575325",
          "weight": 5.26
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575332",
          "weight": 5.26
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575339",
          "weight": 13.16
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22253955",
          "weight": 10.53
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22253925",
          "weight": 7.89
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22253930",
          "weight": 7.89
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22253935",
          "weight": 10.53
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22253940",
          "weight": 7.89
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22253945",
          "weight": 7.89
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22253950",
          "weight": 7.89
        }
      ],
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Decarbonisation_Score_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_1_Decarbonisation_revised+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253968,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Annual carbon footprint or GHG emissions in Scopes 1&2+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Annual_carbon_footprint_or_GHG_emissions_in_Scopes_1_2+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Annual carbon footprint or GHG emissions in Scopes 1&2",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Greenhouse_Gas_GHG_Footprint_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Annual_carbon_footprint_or_GHG_emissions_in_Scopes_1_2+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253973,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Annual value chain/scope 3 carbon footprint+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Annual_value_chain_scope_3_carbon_footprint+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Annual value chain/scope 3 carbon footprint",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Greenhouse_Gas_GHG_Footprint_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Annual_value_chain_scope_3_carbon_footprint+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253979,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2.2 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Footprint (revised)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Greenhouse_Gas_GHG_Footprint_revised.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2.2 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Footprint (revised)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22253968",
          "weight": 28.57
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22253973",
          "weight": 28.57
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575374",
          "weight": 42.86
        }
      ],
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Decarbonisation_Score_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_2_Greenhouse_Gas_GHG_Footprint_revised+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253986,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Disclose what energy is used in the supply chain+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_what_energy_is_used_in_the_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Disclose what energy is used in the supply chain",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Energy_Consumption_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_what_energy_is_used_in_the_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253991,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Disclose what energy is used in the company's owned and operated facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_what_energy_is_used_in_the_company_s_owned_and_operated_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Disclose what energy is used in the company's owned and operated facilities",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Energy_Consumption_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_what_energy_is_used_in_the_company_s_owned_and_operated_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22253996,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Breakdown of the energy consumption by country in the supply chain+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Breakdown_of_the_energy_consumption_by_country_in_the_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Breakdown of the energy consumption by country in the supply chain",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Energy_Consumption_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Breakdown_of_the_energy_consumption_by_country_in_the_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22254001,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Energy sources used for heating and steam in the supply chain+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_sources_used_for_heating_and_steam_in_the_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Energy sources used for heating and steam in the supply chain",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Energy_Consumption_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Energy_sources_used_for_heating_and_steam_in_the_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22254006,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Disclose details on how much electricity is used in the supply chain and where it comes from+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_details_on_how_much_electricity_is_used_in_the_supply_chain_and_where_it_comes_from+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Disclose details on how much electricity is used in the supply chain and where it comes from",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Energy_Consumption_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_details_on_how_much_electricity_is_used_in_the_supply_chain_and_where_it_comes_from+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22254012,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2.3 Energy Consumption (revised)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Energy_Consumption_revised.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2.3 Energy Consumption (revised)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22253991",
          "weight": 11.76
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22253986",
          "weight": 17.65
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22253996",
          "weight": 23.53
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22254001",
          "weight": 23.53
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22254006",
          "weight": 23.53
        }
      ],
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Decarbonisation_Score_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_3_Energy_Consumption_revised+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22254020,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+2. Decarbonisation Score (revised)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Decarbonisation_Score_revised.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "2. Decarbonisation Score (revised)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22253961",
          "weight": 61.29
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22253979",
          "weight": 11.29
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22254012",
          "weight": 27.42
        }
      ],
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2025.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+2_Decarbonisation_Score_revised+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22254027,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Disclose how the company sources energy for its own facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_how_the_company_sources_energy_for_its_own_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Disclose how the company sources energy for its own facilities",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Energy_Procurement_Score_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_how_the_company_sources_energy_for_its_own_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22254032,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Disclose how energy is currently sourced in the supply chain+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_how_energy_is_currently_sourced_in_the_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Disclose how energy is currently sourced in the supply chain",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Energy_Procurement_Score_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_how_energy_is_currently_sourced_in_the_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22254038,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+3. Energy Procurement Score (revised)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Energy_Procurement_Score_revised.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "3. Energy Procurement Score (revised)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19575616",
          "weight": 7.69
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22254027",
          "weight": 23.08
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22254032",
          "weight": 30.77
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575444",
          "weight": 38.46
        }
      ],
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2025.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+3_Energy_Procurement_Score_revised+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22254045,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Investment in climate adaptation measures+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Investment_in_climate_adaptation_measures+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Investment in climate adaptation measures",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Financing_Decarbonisation_Score_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Investment_in_climate_adaptation_measures+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22254051,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Brand support for decarbonisation in supply chain+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Brand_support_for_decarbonisation_in_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Brand support for decarbonisation in supply chain",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Financing_Decarbonisation_Score_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Brand_support_for_decarbonisation_in_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22254057,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Annual investment and the type of financial support for decarbonisation in supply chain+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Annual_investment_and_the_type_of_financial_support_for_decarbonisation_in_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Annual investment and the type of financial support for decarbonisation in supply chain",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Financing_Decarbonisation_Score_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Annual_investment_and_the_type_of_financial_support_for_decarbonisation_in_supply_chain+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22254063,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+4. Financing Decarbonisation Score (revised)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Financing_Decarbonisation_Score_revised.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "4. Financing Decarbonisation Score (revised)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19575465",
          "weight": 21.05
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22254057",
          "weight": 26.32
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22254051",
          "weight": 26.32
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22254045",
          "weight": 26.32
        }
      ],
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2025.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+4_Financing_Decarbonisation_Score_revised+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22254149,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Disclose real-time heat and humidity levels in production facilities+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_real_time_heat_and_humidity_levels_in_production_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Disclose real-time heat and humidity levels in production facilities",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_real_time_heat_and_humidity_levels_in_production_facilities+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22254155,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.1 Just Transition (revised)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition_revised.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.1 Just Transition (revised)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion in Transition Planning",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19575500",
          "weight": 9.09
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575507",
          "weight": 13.64
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575514",
          "weight": 13.64
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575528",
          "weight": 13.64
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575535",
          "weight": 18.18
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22254149",
          "weight": 22.73
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5949032",
          "weight": 4.55
        },
        {
          "metric": "~5948779",
          "weight": 4.55
        }
      ],
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Just_Transition_Advocacy_Score_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_1_Just_Transition_revised+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22254162,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Total annual investment in grid-scale renewable energy projects+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Total_annual_investment_in_grid_scale_renewable_energy_projects+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Total annual investment in grid-scale renewable energy projects",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Total_annual_investment_in_grid_scale_renewable_energy_projects+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22254168,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5.2 Renewable Energy Advocacy (revised)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy_revised.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5.2 Renewable Energy Advocacy (revised)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22254162",
          "weight": 36.36
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575542",
          "weight": 27.27
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575549",
          "weight": 36.36
        }
      ],
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Just_Transition_Advocacy_Score_revised.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_2_Renewable_Energy_Advocacy_revised+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22254175,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+5. Just Transition & Advocacy Score (revised)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Just_Transition_Advocacy_Score_revised.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "5. Just Transition & Advocacy Score (revised)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion in Transition Planning",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22254155",
          "weight": 62.86
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22254168",
          "weight": 31.43
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19575556",
          "weight": 5.71
        }
      ],
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2025.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+5_Just_Transition_Advocacy_Score_revised+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22254195,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Fashion Transparency Index 2025",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2025.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Fashion Transparency Index 2025",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the Fashion Transparency Index 2025 (What Fuels Fashion edition)?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>While we are seeing companies share their policies and commitments on human rights and the environment, there is still much crucial information about the practices of the fashion industry that remains concealed — particularly when it comes to impacts on the lives of workers in the supply chain and on the environment.</p>\r\n<p>The Fashion Transparency Index 2025 is a special edition reviews and <em><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><span>ranks </span>200 of the world's largest fashion brands</span></em> on <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\"><em>disclosure of their climate and energy-related policies</em></span>, practices and impacts in their own operations and supply chains.</p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.fashionrevolution.org/about/transparency/\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.fashionrevolution.org/transparency/</a></p>\r\n<p>This year for the sixth time, Fashion Revolution has partnered with Wikirate to make the Fashion Transparency Index and its underlying data more accessible and comparable through Wikirate's open data platform. Wikirate supports benchmarking initiatives in making their company data and scoring systems available for anyone to use in research and advocacy. </p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">A note on the scoring system</span></p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On <a href=\"http://wikirate.org/\" target=\"_blank\">Wikirate.org</a>, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.</p>\r\n<p>The Fashion Transparency Index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). It is not a Free Culture Licence. Please see the link for more information: <a href=\"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/\" target=\"_blank\">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</a></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Targets & Transition Plans",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Code of Conduct",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Audits & Monitoring",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change Policy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Local Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Management & Efficiency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Clean and Renewable Energy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Energy Sourcing",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Risk Integration",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Equity in Climate Policies",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Inclusion in Transition Planning",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Reskilling & Workforce Transition",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supplier Diversity",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employee Training & Development",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Education & Training",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22253883",
          "weight": 14
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22254020",
          "weight": 41.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22254038",
          "weight": 8.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22254063",
          "weight": 12.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22254175",
          "weight": 23.33
        }
      ],
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Fashion_Transparency_Index_2025+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22333612,
      "name": "GreenDex+UNGC Status",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+UNGC_Status.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "UNGC Status",
      "question": "Does this company participate in the UN Global Compact Initiative? If so, what is their participation status?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": "<p>This Metric reports the company's Participation Status in <a href=\"https://www.unglobalcompact.org/\">UN Global Compact</a> initiative.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p><a href=\"https://www.unglobalcompact.org/participation/report/cop\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.unglobalcompact.org/participation/report/cop</a></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Active",
        "Delisted",
        "Non-Communicating",
        "Not Listed"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~1603109"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3081,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1968,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+UNGC_Status+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22334479,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Disclose exit strategy when a brand leaves a supplier+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_exit_strategy_when_a_brand_leaves_a_supplier+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Disclose exit strategy when a brand leaves a supplier",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 204,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 204,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_exit_strategy_when_a_brand_leaves_a_supplier+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22334484,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Disclose annual percentage change in average price per item paid to suppliers+Fashion Revolution Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_annual_percentage_change_in_average_price_per_item_paid_to_suppliers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Disclose annual percentage change in average price per item paid to suppliers",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 204,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 204,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Disclose_annual_percentage_change_in_average_price_per_item_paid_to_suppliers+Fashion_Revolution_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22334497,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Supply Chain Wage Data Disclosure+Clean Clothes Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Wage_Data_Disclosure+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Supply Chain Wage Data Disclosure",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1567,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 361,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Transparency_Score_testing.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Transparency_Score.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Wage_Data_Disclosure+Clean_Clothes_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22334511,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Supply Chain Transparency Score (testing)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Transparency_Score_testing.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Supply Chain Transparency Score (testing)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Goals & Targets",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Materials",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainable Supply Chains",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Engagement Programs",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~7733755",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~7733759",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22334497",
          "weight": 25
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Supply_Chain_Transparency_Score_testing+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22335077,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Report discoverability+Wikirate International e.V.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Report_discoverability+Wikirate_International_e_V.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Report discoverability",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Own website\":\"5\",\"Central database\":\"5\",\"On request\":\"0\",\"other\":\"0\",\"Nowhere\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_Integrity_Index_2025.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Report_discoverability+Wikirate_International_e_V+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22335083,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Archive of non-financial reports+Wikirate International e.V.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Archive_of_non_financial_reports+Wikirate_International_e_V.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Archive of non-financial reports",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_Integrity_Index_2025.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Archive_of_non_financial_reports+Wikirate_International_e_V+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22335089,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Direct links to referenced documents+Wikirate International e.V.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Direct_links_to_referenced_documents+Wikirate_International_e_V.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Direct links to referenced documents",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_Integrity_Index_2025.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Direct_links_to_referenced_documents+Wikirate_International_e_V+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22335095,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Archive of referenced documents+Wikirate International e.V.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Archive_of_referenced_documents+Wikirate_International_e_V.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Archive of referenced documents",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Archive with current and historic documents\":\"10\",\"Library with current documents\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_Integrity_Index_2025.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Archive_of_referenced_documents+Wikirate_International_e_V+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22335101,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Entity identification+Wikirate International e.V.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Entity_identification+Wikirate_International_e_V.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Entity identification",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Company Registration Number/ID\":\"10\",\"Legal Entity Identifier (LEI)\":\"10\",\"Tax ID\":\"10\",\"International Securities Identification Number (ISIN)\":\"10\",\"OpenCorporates ID\":\"10\",\"SEC Central Index Key\":\"10\",\"Other\":\"0\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_Integrity_Index_2025.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Entity_identification+Wikirate_International_e_V+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22335107,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Reporting period specified+Wikirate International e.V.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_period_specified+Wikirate_International_e_V.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Reporting period specified",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_Integrity_Index_2025.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_period_specified+Wikirate_International_e_V+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22335113,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Aligned page numbering+Wikirate International e.V.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Aligned_page_numbering+Wikirate_International_e_V.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Aligned page numbering",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_Integrity_Index_2025.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Aligned_page_numbering+Wikirate_International_e_V+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22335119,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Reporting standards+Wikirate International e.V.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_standards+Wikirate_International_e_V.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Reporting standards",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"GRI Standards\":\"10\",\"ISSB (IFRS)\":\"10\",\"SASB\":\"10\",\"CSRD (ESRS)\":\"10\",\"CDP\":\"10\",\"CDSB\":\"10\",\"Greenhouse Gas Protocol\":\"10\",\"National standards\":\"10\",\"Other\":\"0\",\"None\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_Integrity_Index_2025.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_standards+Wikirate_International_e_V+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22335125,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Data license explicit+Wikirate International e.V.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Data_license_explicit+Wikirate_International_e_V.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Data license explicit",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_Integrity_Index_2025.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Data_license_explicit+Wikirate_International_e_V+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22335131,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Data license type+Wikirate International e.V.",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Data_license_type+Wikirate_International_e_V.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Data license type",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Open license\":\"10\",\"Closed license\":\"0\",\"Not specified\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_Integrity_Index_2025.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Data_license_type+Wikirate_International_e_V+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22335146,
      "name": "GreenDex+Border Militarization & Immigration Criminalization",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Border_Militarization_Immigration_Criminalization.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Border Militarization & Immigration Criminalization",
      "question": "Is this company involved in any aspects of border militarization or the criminalization of immigration? If not, they do not need an answer under this metric. If so, please explain.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Libre Franklin', sans-serif; font-size: 18px;\">Borders between the global north and south are fortified and militarized to secure the movement of wealth and goods while limiting the movement of poor immigrants and refugees. These borders can correspond to national borders, and they can also divide areas according to ethnic, racial, or religious lines. At times, these borders cut through ancestral lands, nature reserves, take over resources, isolate and strangle occupied peoples. The fortification of these borders is never-ending, using ever-growing physical barriers, armed presence, and technological surveillance and monitoring. The border and surveillance industries have been similarly growing, with the development of \"virtual\" borders and mass surveillance technologies.</p>\r\n<p style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Libre Franklin', sans-serif; font-size: 18px;\">This Metric focuses on the main companies involved in all aspects of border militarization and the criminalization of immigration.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Data for this Metric may be drawn from various places, but for now is primarily drawn from <a href=\"https://investigate.info/borders\">https://investigate.info/borders</a>. Investigate is a project of The American Friends Service Committee.</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 9,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 9,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Border_Militarization_Immigration_Criminalization+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22335293,
      "name": "GreenDex+Occupation Violence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Occupation_Violence.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Occupation Violence",
      "question": "Is this company involved in state violence and/or human rights violations as a part of occupations? If not, they do not need an answer under this metric. If so, please explain.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Libre Franklin', sans-serif; font-size: 18px;\">This Metric includes companies involved in state violence and human rights violations as a part of occupations through:</p>\r\n<ul style=\"margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding: 0px 20px; color: #000000; font-family: 'Libre Franklin', sans-serif; font-size: 18px;\">\r\n<li style=\"margin-bottom: 15px;\"><a href=\"http://investigate.afsc.org/tags/settlement-industry\" style=\"background-color: transparent; color: #0a8c00;\">The Settlement Industry</a> - companies that support and maintain illegal settlements in occupied lands.</li>\r\n<li style=\"margin-bottom: 15px;\"><a href=\"http://investigate.afsc.org/tags/exploitation-natural-resources\" style=\"background-color: transparent; color: #0a8c00;\">Exploitation of Natural Resources</a> - companies involved in the exploitation and plundering of natural resources in occupied lands.</li>\r\n<li style=\"margin-bottom: 15px;\"><a href=\"http://investigate.afsc.org/tags/wall-and-checkpoints-palestine\" style=\"background-color: transparent; color: #0a8c00;\">Wall and Checkpoints</a> - companies that support the system of severe travel restrictions Israel imposes on Palestinians.</li>\r\n<li style=\"margin-bottom: 15px;\"><a href=\"http://investigate.afsc.org/tags/weapons-and-military-equipment\" style=\"background-color: transparent; color: #0a8c00;\">Weapons and Military Equipment</a> - companies that provide militant groups in Palestine/Israel with weapons and militarized equipment specifically designed for and consistently used in war crimes or attacks on civilians.</li>\r\n<li style=\"margin-bottom: 15px;\"><a href=\"http://investigate.afsc.org/tags/discrimination\" style=\"background-color: transparent; color: #0a8c00;\">Discrimination</a> - companies that discriminate against Palestinians in their services or goods, in the workplace, or by exploiting the unequal and discriminatory legal situation for their commercial benefit.</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p>Data for this Metric may be drawn from various places, but for now is primarily drawn from <a href=\"https://investigate.info/occupations\">https://investigate.info/occupations</a>. Investigate is a project of The American Friends Service Committee.</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Conflict Minerals Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Child Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Modern Slavery",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Indigenous Peoples Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 14,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 14,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Occupation_Violence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22335305,
      "name": "GreenDex+Prison Industry Involvement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Prison_Industry_Involvement.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Prison Industry Involvement",
      "question": "Is this company involved in or profiting from the prison industry? If not, they do not need an answer under this metric. If so, please explain.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Libre Franklin', sans-serif; font-size: 18px;\">The prison industry in the United States is massive and growing. Since 1970, the number of incarcerated people in the U.S. has increased by 700 percent, to the point that the U.S. prison population is the largest in the world both per capita and in total numbers. As of 2019, there are an <a href=\"https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/pie2019.html\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: transparent; text-decoration-line: none; color: #0a8c00;\">estimated</a> 2.3 million people behind bars and 4.5 million people on probation or parole. The <a href=\"http://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/money.html\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: transparent; text-decoration-line: none; color: #0a8c00;\">estimated cost</a> of the U.S. mass incarceration system is $182 billion a year, with hundreds of private companies competing for government contracts.</p>\r\n<p style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Libre Franklin', sans-serif; font-size: 18px;\">The most visible and publicly debated corporate involvement in the prison industry is through private prisons, i.e. prisons that are owned, managed, or operated by private for-profit companies instead of by government agencies. As of 2019, an <a href=\"https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/private-prisons-united-states/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"background-color: transparent; text-decoration-line: none; color: #0a8c00;\">estimated</a> 8.2 percent of people in U.S. federal and state prisons are incarcerated in private prisons, and nearly three-quarters of all people in immigration detention are held in privately-run facilities.</p>\r\n<p style=\"color: #000000; font-family: 'Libre Franklin', sans-serif; font-size: 18px;\">However, <strong style=\"font-weight: bold;\">private prisons are just the tip of the iceberg for prison profiteering</strong>. Whether public or private, all prisons, jails, and immigration detention centers rely on for-profit companies for their operations, as nearly every aspect of the prison industry has been privatized to a certain degree.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Data for this Metric may be drawn from various places, but for now is primarily drawn from <a href=\"https://investigate.info/prisons\">https://investigate.info/prisons</a>. Investigate is a project of The American Friends Service Committee.</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Forced Labor",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Conflict-Affected Areas",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Migrant Worker Protections"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 8,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Prison_Industry_Involvement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22335317,
      "name": "GreenDex+Consumer Boycott",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Consumer_Boycott.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Consumer Boycott",
      "question": "Is this company currently the subject of a popular consumer boycott? If not, they do not need an answer under this metric. If so, please explain.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Boycotts are most effective at enacting change when they are targeted and specific. This Metric aims to capture a relatively-small handful of companies, each of which are currently (for the year given) subject to a widespread <em>consumer-level</em> boycott for reasons related to their specific practices and impact.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Data for this Metric may be sourced from various different places, provided it is sufficiently clear that the company in question is subject to a widespread, targeted, consumer-level boycott. For example, the Palestinian-led Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement provides a small, highly-targeted list of boycott targets which millions of consumers regularly engage with.</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Accountability Index",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Community Impact",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Impact on Local Communities",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Fair Marketing & Consumer Information",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Consumer Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+LGBT Inclusion",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Business Ethics",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Bribery & Corruption Prevention",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Compliance and Corrective Action",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Non-compliance and Sanctions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Whistleblowing Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+AI Ethics & Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 28,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 28,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Consumer_Boycott+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22338473,
      "name": "GreenDex+Scope 3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Scope_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Scope 3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions",
      "question": "What are the company's Scope 3 (supply chain/value chain) Greenhouse Gas Emissions, in terms of metric tonnes of CO2 equivalence? Scope 3 includes all categories of potential GHG emissions that do not belong to Scope 1 or 2.",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": "metric tonnes CO2 eq.",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "yes",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Climate Change",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Carbon Footprint of Supply Chain"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~849642"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~21473277"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 3559,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1241,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Scope_3_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339318,
      "name": "GreenDex+Wage Ratio",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Wage_Ratio.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Wage Ratio",
      "question": "What is the ratio of the annual total compensation for the highest paid individual at this company to the median annual total compensation for all employees at the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": "<p>For example, if the annual total compensation for the highest paid individual was $300,000 and the median annual total compensation for all employees was $90,000, the ratio between them would be approximately 3.33.</p>",
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "times the median annual wage",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance Structure",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Executive Pay & Bonuses"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Wage_Ratio+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339341,
      "name": "GreenDex+Mean Gender Hourly Pay Gap (researched)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Mean_Gender_Hourly_Pay_Gap_researched.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Mean Gender Hourly Pay Gap (researched)",
      "question": "What is the average gender pay gap present within the company's hourly pay? \r\nNegative values represent female pay being greater than male pay on average.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Corporate Social Responsibility Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Gender Equality",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Pay Equity Analysis"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 3,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 3,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Mean_Gender_Pay_Gap_Hourly_Pay.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Mean_Gender_Hourly_Pay_Gap_researched+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339607,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Disclosure of corporate political contributions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Disclosure_of_corporate_political_contributions.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Disclosure of corporate political contributions",
      "question": "Does the company publicly disclose corporate contributions to political candidates, parties, and committees, including recipient names and amounts given?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy prohibiting corporate contributions to all candidates, parties, and committees.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company provides itemized disclosure (i.e., names of recipients and amounts given to each).<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The company partially discloses (e.g., provides a list of recipients but not the amount each received).<br>\n<br>\nNo: No disclosure is provided, or the company provides a single, aggregate amount of its political spending.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Disclosure of corporate political contributions+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Disclosure_of_corporate_political_contributions+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Disclosure_of_corporate_political_contributions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339619,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Payments to 527 groups",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_527_groups.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Payments to 527 groups",
      "question": "Does the company publicly disclose payments to 527 groups, such as governors associations and super PACs, including recipient names and amounts given?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy prohibiting corporate contributions to all groups organized under § 527 of the Internal Revenue Code.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company provides itemized disclosure (i.e., names of recipients and amounts given to each).<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The company partially discloses (e.g., provides a list of recipients but not the amount each received).<br>\n<br>\nNo: No disclosure is provided, or the company provides a single, aggregate amount of its political spending.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Payments to 527 groups+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6430,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_527_groups+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_527_groups+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339631,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Independent political expenditures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Independent_political_expenditures.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Independent political expenditures",
      "question": "Does the company publicly disclose independent political expenditures made in direct support of or opposition to a campaign, including recipient names and amounts given?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy prohibiting independent expenditures using corporate funds.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company discloses any direct independent expenditures made to support or oppose a candidate or ballot measure, identifying the candidate or measure being supported or opposed.<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The company partially discloses (e.g., provides a list of beneficiaries but not the amount each received).<br>\n<br>\nNo: No disclosure is provided, or the company provides a single, aggregate amount of its political spending.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Independent political expenditures+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Independent_political_expenditures+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Independent_political_expenditures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339643,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Payments to trade associations for political purposes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_trade_associations_for_political_purposes.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Payments to trade associations for political purposes",
      "question": "Does the company publicly disclose payments to trade associations that the recipient organization may use for political purposes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy that it prohibits trade associations of which it is a member from using its payments for election-related purposes.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company provides itemized disclosure of all nondeductible payments, including special assessments (i.e., names of trade associations and amounts given to each).<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The company partially discloses (e.g., provides a list of associations but not the amount of payments).<br>\n<br>\nNo: No disclosure is provided, or the company provides a single, aggregate amount of its nondeductible spending.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Payments to trade associations for political purposes+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_trade_associations_for_political_purposes+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_trade_associations_for_political_purposes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339655,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Payments to tax-exempt organizations for political purposes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_tax_exempt_organizations_for_political_purposes.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Payments to tax-exempt organizations for political purposes",
      "question": "Does the company publicly disclose payments to other tax-exempt organizations, such as 501(c)(4)s, that the recipient may use for political purposes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy that it prohibits tax-exempt groups to which it contributes from using its payments for election-related purposes, or clearly prohibits such contributions entirely.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company provides itemized disclosure of all payments (i.e., names of politically active tax-exempt groups and amounts given to each).<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The company partially discloses (e.g., provides a list of recipients but not the amount each received).<br>\n<br>\nNo: No disclosure is provided, or the company provides a single, aggregate amount of its political spending.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Payments to tax-exempt organizations for political purposes+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6430,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_tax_exempt_organizations_for_political_purposes+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_tax_exempt_organizations_for_political_purposes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339667,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Amounts paid to trade associations and tax-exempt organizations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Amounts_paid_to_trade_associations_and_tax_exempt_organizations.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Amounts paid to trade associations and tax-exempt organizations",
      "question": "Does the company publicly disclose a list of the amounts and recipients of payments made by trade associations or other tax exempt organizations of which the company is either a member or donor?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy that it does not contribute to trade associations or tax-exempt groups, or the company restricts its payments to third-party groups to non-election related purposes.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company provides itemized disclosure of candidates or organizations that received money from third-party organizations to which it has contributed.<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The company discloses some, but not all, contributions made by third parties to whom it has given corporate money.<br>\n<br>\nNo: No such disclosure is made.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Amounts paid to trade associations and tax-exempt organizations+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Amounts_paid_to_trade_associations_and_tax_exempt_organizations+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Amounts_paid_to_trade_associations_and_tax_exempt_organizations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339679,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Payments to influence ballot measures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_influence_ballot_measures.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Payments to influence ballot measures",
      "question": "Does the company publicly disclose payments made to influence the outcome of ballot measures, including recipient names and amounts given?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy prohibiting corporate contributions to ballot initiatives.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company provides itemized disclosure (i.e., names of initiatives and amounts given to each).<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The company partially discloses (e.g., provides a list of initiatives supported but not the amount each received).<br>\n<br>\nNo: No disclosure is provided, or the company provides a single, aggregate amount of its political spending.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Payments to influence ballot measures+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_influence_ballot_measures+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_influence_ballot_measures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339691,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Senior managers with authority over political spending",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Senior_managers_with_authority_over_political_spending.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Senior managers with authority over political spending",
      "question": "Does the company publicly disclose the company’s senior managers (by position/title of the individuals involved) who have final authority over the company’s political spending decisions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy prohibiting election-related expenditures from corporate funds and restricts its payments to third-party groups to non-election related purposes.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company discloses the positions and titles of senior managers with final authority over political spending decisions.<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The company only discloses a department or unit with such responsibility, or the disclosure is otherwise ambiguous.<br>\n<br>\nNo: No such disclosure is made.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Senior managers with authority over political spending+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Senior_managers_with_authority_over_political_spending+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Senior_managers_with_authority_over_political_spending+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339703,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Archived political expenditure reports",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Archived_political_expenditure_reports.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Archived political expenditure reports",
      "question": "Does the company publicly disclose an archive of each political expenditure report, including all direct and/or indirect contributions, for each year since the company began disclosing the information (or at least for the past five years)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The current report is the company’s first disclosure report, or the company has a clear policy prohibiting election-related expenditures from corporate funds and restricts its payments to third-party groups to non-election related purposes.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company website includes links to all political spending disclosure reports issued since voluntary disclosure was adopted, or for at least the past five years.<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The company maintains a partial archive of its political spending reports (i.e., fewer than five and fewer than it has issued).<br>\n<br>\nNo: The company does not maintain historical political spending disclosure reports on its website.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Archived political expenditure reports+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Archived_political_expenditure_reports+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Archived_political_expenditure_reports+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339715,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Political expenditure policy from corporate funds",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_expenditure_policy_from_corporate_funds.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Political expenditure policy from corporate funds",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a detailed policy governing its political expenditures from corporate funds?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: (A company cannot receive “Not Applicable” for this indicator.)<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company publicly discloses a detailed policy that includes information about the kinds of corporate election-related spending permitted as well as information about managerial and board oversight of spending decisions.<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The company discloses a brief policy, perhaps only in its code of conduct or code of ethics.<br>\n<br>\nNo: No policy regarding corporate political spending can be found on the website.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Political expenditure policy from corporate funds+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_expenditure_policy_from_corporate_funds+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_expenditure_policy_from_corporate_funds+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339727,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Policy permitting only employee-funded PAC contributions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Policy_permitting_only_employee_funded_PAC_contributions.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Policy permitting only employee-funded PAC contributions",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy permitting political contributions only through voluntary employee-funded PAC contributions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: (A company cannot receive “Not Applicable” for this indicator.)<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company’s policy permits PAC contributions but prohibits the use of corporate funds for direct political expenditures (indirect spending through third parties is not considered for this indicator).<br>\n<br>\nPartial: (A company cannot receive “Partial” for this indicator.)<br>\n<br>\nNo: The company may use corporate funds for political spending.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Policy permitting only employee-funded PAC contributions+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Policy_permitting_only_employee_funded_PAC_contributions+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Policy_permitting_only_employee_funded_PAC_contributions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339739,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Company interests over executives’ preferences policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Company_interests_over_executives_preferences_policy.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Company interests over executives’ preferences policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy stating that all of its contributions will promote the interests of the company and will be made without regard for the private political preferences of executives?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy prohibiting election-related expenditures from corporate funds.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company’s policy includes this statement or something very similar.<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The policy includes language vaguely relevant to the spirit of this language, or covers one part but not the other.<br>\n<br>\nNo: No such statement is made.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Company interests over executives’ preferences policy+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Company_interests_over_executives_preferences_policy+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Company_interests_over_executives_preferences_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339751,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Entities considered proper recipients of political spending",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Entities_considered_proper_recipients_of_political_spending.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Entities considered proper recipients of political spending",
      "question": "Does the company publicly describe the types of entities considered to be proper recipients of the company’s political spending?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy prohibiting election-related expenditures from corporate funds.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The policy describes the types of recipients that may receive the company’s money (see indicators 1–5 and 7).<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The policy includes vague language somewhat relevant to the spirit of this indicator, or offers a short or incomplete list of permissible recipients of the company’s political spending.<br>\n<br>\nNo: No such statement is made.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Entities considered proper recipients of political spending+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Entities_considered_proper_recipients_of_political_spending+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Entities_considered_proper_recipients_of_political_spending+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339763,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Public policy positions guiding corporate political spending",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Public_policy_positions_guiding_corporate_political_spending.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Public policy positions guiding corporate political spending",
      "question": "Does the company publicly describe its public policy positions that become the basis for its spending decisions with corporate funds?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy prohibiting election-related expenditures from corporate funds.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company’s policy describes specific issues that form the basis for the company’s political spending decisions (e.g., for a pharma company, “barriers to access, counterfeits, and challenges to intellectual property protection”).<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The policy includes vague language somewhat relevant to the spirit of this indicator (e.g., “candidates whose positions are consistent with the best interests of the company; elections in areas where we do business”).<br>\n<br>\nNo: No such statement is made.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Public policy positions guiding corporate political spending+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Public_policy_positions_guiding_corporate_political_spending+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Public_policy_positions_guiding_corporate_political_spending+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339775,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Senior management oversight of political spending policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Senior_management_oversight_of_political_spending_policy.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Senior management oversight of political spending policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a public policy requiring senior managers to oversee and have final authority over all of the company’s political spending?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy prohibiting election-related expenditures from corporate funds.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company’s policy requires senior managers to approve or make final decisions on political spending.<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The policy includes language somewhat relevant to the spirit of this indicator.<br>\n<br>\nNo: No such statement is made.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Senior management oversight of political spending policy+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Senior_management_oversight_of_political_spending_policy+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Senior_management_oversight_of_political_spending_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339787,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Board oversight of corporate political activity policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_oversight_of_corporate_political_activity_policy.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Board oversight of corporate political activity policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy that the board of directors regularly oversees the company’s corporate political activity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy prohibiting election-related expenditures from corporate funds.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company’s policy indicates that the board of directors regularly reviews or oversees the company’s political spending.<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The policy suggests that there is board involvement, but the nature and extent of such involvement are unclear or ambiguous.<br>\n<br>\nNo: There is no indication that the board oversees company political spending.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Board oversight of corporate political activity policy+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_oversight_of_corporate_political_activity_policy+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_oversight_of_corporate_political_activity_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339799,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Board committee reviewing political expenditure policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_reviewing_political_expenditure_policy.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Board committee reviewing political expenditure policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s policy on political expenditures?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: (A company cannot receive “Not Applicable” for this indicator.)<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company identifies a specific board committee that reviews the company’s political spending policy.<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The policy suggests that there is board committee involvement, but whether the committee reviews the company’s policy is unclear or ambiguous.<br>\n<br>\nNo: There is no indication that a specified board committee reviews the company’s policy.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Board committee reviewing political expenditure policy+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_reviewing_political_expenditure_policy+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_reviewing_political_expenditure_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339811,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Board committee reviewing political expenditures from corporate funds",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_reviewing_political_expenditures_from_corporate_funds.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Board committee reviewing political expenditures from corporate funds",
      "question": "Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s political expenditures made with corporate funds?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy prohibiting election-related expenditures from corporate funds.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company identifies a specific board committee that reviews direct political expenditures made from corporate funds.<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The policy suggests that there is board committee involvement, but whether the committee reviews the company’s direct political expenditures is unclear or ambiguous.<br>\n<br>\nNo: There is no indication that a specified board committee reviews corporate political expenditures.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Board committee reviewing political expenditures from corporate funds+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_reviewing_political_expenditures_from_corporate_funds+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_reviewing_political_expenditures_from_corporate_funds+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339823,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Board committee reviewing payments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_reviewing_payments.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Board committee reviewing payments",
      "question": "Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s payments to trade associations and other tax-exempt organizations that may be used for political purposes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy prohibiting election-related expenditures from corporate funds and restricts its payments to third-party groups to non-election related purposes.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company identifies a specific board committee that reviews indirect political expenditures made from corporate funds.<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The policy suggests that there is board committee involvement, but whether the committee reviews the company’s direct political expenditures is unclear or ambiguous.<br>\n<br>\nNo: There is no indication that a specified board committee reviews corporate political expenditures.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Board committee reviewing payments+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_reviewing_payments+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_reviewing_payments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339835,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Board committee approving political expenditures",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_approving_political_expenditures.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Board committee approving political expenditures",
      "question": "Does the company have a specified board committee that approves political expenditures from corporate funds?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy prohibiting election-related expenditures from corporate funds.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company identifies a specific board committee that approves direct and indirect political expenditures made from corporate funds (typically, this entails approval of a budget or spending plan).<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The policy suggests that there is board committee involvement, but whether the committee approves the company’s political expenditures is unclear or ambiguous.<br>\n<br>\nNo: There is no indication that a specified board committee approves corporate political expenditures.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Board committee approving political expenditures+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_approving_political_expenditures+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_approving_political_expenditures+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339847,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Board committee outside directors overseeing political activity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_outside_directors_overseeing_political_activity.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Board committee outside directors overseeing political activity",
      "question": "Does the company have a specified board committee, composed entirely of outside directors, that oversees its political activity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy prohibiting election-related expenditures from corporate funds.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The board committee identified by the company is composed entirely of independent directors.<br>\n<br>\nPartial: (A company cannot receive “Partial” for this indicator.)<br>\n<br>\nNo: The independence of the committee members cannot be determined, or there is no indication that a board committee oversees indirect political expenditures.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Board committee outside directors overseeing political activity+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_outside_directors_overseeing_political_activity+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_outside_directors_overseeing_political_activity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339859,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Semiannual report of political spending on website",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Semiannual_report_of_political_spending_on_website.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Semiannual report of political spending on website",
      "question": "Does the company post on its website a detailed report of its political spending with corporate funds semiannually?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy prohibiting election-related expenditures from corporate funds and restricts its payments to third-party groups to non-election related purposes.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company’s disclosure reports are issued semi-annually.<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The reports are issued annually.<br>\n<br>\nNo: The company does not issue disclosure reports.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Semiannual report of political spending on website+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Semiannual_report_of_political_spending_on_website+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Semiannual_report_of_political_spending_on_website+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339871,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Accessibility of political disclosure page",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Accessibility_of_political_disclosure_page.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Accessibility of political disclosure page",
      "question": "Does the company make available a dedicated political disclosure web page found through search or accessible within three mouse-clicks from homepage?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: The company has a clear policy prohibiting election-related expenditures from corporate funds.<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company has a webpage dedicated to its political spending policy and/or disclosure reports that can be easily found through an internet search (i.e., company name and “political contributions” or “political expenditures”) or can be navigated to within 3 clicks from the company’s home page.<br>\n<br>\nPartial: The company has a dedicated political spending webpage, but it is somewhat difficult to find.<br>\n<br>\nNo: The company’s political spending policy and/or disclosures cannot be found through a basic search, or extensive navigation through the website is required.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Accessibility of political disclosure page+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Accessibility_of_political_disclosure_page+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Accessibility_of_political_disclosure_page+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22339883,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Internal process or statement of compliance with political spending policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Internal_process_or_statement_of_compliance_with_political_spending_policy.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Internal process or statement of compliance with political spending policy",
      "question": "Does the company disclose an internal process for or an affirmative statement on ensuring compliance with its political spending policy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.<br>\n<br>\nThe Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the [[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/|CPA-Zicklin Index]] highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.",
      "methodology": "Not Applicable: (A company cannot receive “Not Applicable” for this indicator.)<br>\n<br>\nYes: The company includes a statement that it conducts compliance measures to ensure adherence to the political spending policy, or company disclosure reports include a statement confirming that all contributions were made in compliance with company policy.<br>\n<br>\nPartial: A statement on compliance is included, but it is ambiguous (e.g., it’s unclear whether the compliance measures apply to the political spending policy or general legal and ethical requirements).<br>\n<br>\nNo: No explicit statement is made concerning compliance with the company’s own political spending policy.<br>\n<br>\nScores are based on publicly available information, with companies receiving credit when disclosure or policy commitments are clearly documented.<br>\n<br>\n[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|The “Scoring Key” (see Appendix C)]] lists the 2024 indicators and the maximum points given for each. Numerical scores were assigned following a simple arithmetic system, described below.<br>\n• A response of “No” to an indicator resulted in a score of zero;<br>\n• A response of “Yes” or “Not Applicable (Not Applicable)” resulted in the maximum score; and <br>\n• A response of “Partial” resulted in half of the maximum score.<br>\nThe indicators that are highlighted in the Scoring Key are considered “key performance indicators” (KPIs), which are scored more heavily than the rest.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Not Applicable",
        "Yes",
        "Partial",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Center for Political Accountability+Internal process or statement of compliance with political spending policy+Center for Political Accountability Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Internal_process_or_statement_of_compliance_with_political_spending_policy+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Internal_process_or_statement_of_compliance_with_political_spending_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22346551,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Entities considered proper recipients of political spending+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Entities_considered_proper_recipients_of_political_spending+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Entities considered proper recipients of political spending",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Policy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Entities_considered_proper_recipients_of_political_spending+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22347293,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Internal process or statement of compliance with political spending policy+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Internal_process_or_statement_of_compliance_with_political_spending_policy+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Internal process or statement of compliance with political spending policy",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Oversight.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Internal_process_or_statement_of_compliance_with_political_spending_policy+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22347655,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Accessibility of political disclosure page+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Accessibility_of_political_disclosure_page+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Accessibility of political disclosure page",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Oversight.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Accessibility_of_political_disclosure_page+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22347909,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Semiannual report of political spending on website+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Semiannual_report_of_political_spending_on_website+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Semiannual report of political spending on website",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Oversight.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Semiannual_report_of_political_spending_on_website+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348075,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Board committee outside directors overseeing political activity+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_outside_directors_overseeing_political_activity+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Board committee outside directors overseeing political activity",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Oversight.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_outside_directors_overseeing_political_activity+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348353,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Board committee approving political expenditures+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_approving_political_expenditures+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Board committee approving political expenditures",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Oversight.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_approving_political_expenditures+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348359,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Board committee reviewing payments+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_reviewing_payments+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Board committee reviewing payments",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Oversight.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_reviewing_payments+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348365,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Board committee reviewing political expenditures from corporate funds+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_reviewing_political_expenditures_from_corporate_funds+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Board committee reviewing political expenditures from corporate funds",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Oversight.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_reviewing_political_expenditures_from_corporate_funds+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348371,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Board committee reviewing political expenditure policy+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_reviewing_political_expenditure_policy+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Board committee reviewing political expenditure policy",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Oversight.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_committee_reviewing_political_expenditure_policy+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348377,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Board oversight of corporate political activity policy+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_oversight_of_corporate_political_activity_policy+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Board oversight of corporate political activity policy",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Policy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Board_oversight_of_corporate_political_activity_policy+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348383,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Public policy positions guiding corporate political spending+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Public_policy_positions_guiding_corporate_political_spending+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Public policy positions guiding corporate political spending",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Policy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Public_policy_positions_guiding_corporate_political_spending+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348389,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Disclosure of corporate political contributions+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Disclosure_of_corporate_political_contributions+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Disclosure of corporate political contributions",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10.0\",\"Yes\":\"10.0\",\"Partial\":\"5.0\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Disclosure.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Disclosure_of_corporate_political_contributions+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348395,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Company interests over executives’ preferences policy+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Company_interests_over_executives_preferences_policy+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Company interests over executives’ preferences policy",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Policy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Company_interests_over_executives_preferences_policy+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348401,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Archived political expenditure reports+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Archived_political_expenditure_reports+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Archived political expenditure reports",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Disclosure.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Archived_political_expenditure_reports+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348407,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Policy permitting only employee-funded PAC contributions+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Policy_permitting_only_employee_funded_PAC_contributions+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Policy permitting only employee-funded PAC contributions",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Policy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Policy_permitting_only_employee_funded_PAC_contributions+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348413,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Payments to 527 groups+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_527_groups+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Payments to 527 groups",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10.0\",\"Yes\":\"10.0\",\"Partial\":\"5.0\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6430,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Disclosure.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_527_groups+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348419,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Payments to trade associations for political purposes+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_trade_associations_for_political_purposes+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Payments to trade associations for political purposes",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Disclosure.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_trade_associations_for_political_purposes+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348425,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Independent political expenditures+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Independent_political_expenditures+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Independent political expenditures",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5.0\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Disclosure.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Independent_political_expenditures+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348431,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Payments to tax-exempt organizations for political purposes+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_tax_exempt_organizations_for_political_purposes+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Payments to tax-exempt organizations for political purposes",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6430,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Disclosure.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_tax_exempt_organizations_for_political_purposes+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348437,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Amounts paid to trade associations and tax-exempt organizations+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Amounts_paid_to_trade_associations_and_tax_exempt_organizations+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Amounts paid to trade associations and tax-exempt organizations",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Disclosure.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Amounts_paid_to_trade_associations_and_tax_exempt_organizations+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348443,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Political expenditure policy from corporate funds+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_expenditure_policy_from_corporate_funds+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Political expenditure policy from corporate funds",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Policy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_expenditure_policy_from_corporate_funds+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348449,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Senior managers with authority over political spending+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Senior_managers_with_authority_over_political_spending+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Senior managers with authority over political spending",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Disclosure.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Senior_managers_with_authority_over_political_spending+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348455,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Payments to influence ballot measures+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_influence_ballot_measures+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Payments to influence ballot measures",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Disclosure.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Payments_to_influence_ballot_measures+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22348461,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Senior management oversight of political spending policy+Center for Political Accountability Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Senior_management_oversight_of_political_spending_policy+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Senior management oversight of political spending policy",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Not Applicable\":\"10\",\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partial\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0.0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Policy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Senior_management_oversight_of_political_spending_policy+Center_for_Political_Accountability_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363455,
      "name": "Fairwork+Local minimun wage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Local_minimun_wage.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Local minimun wage",
      "question": "Does the platform ensure that workers earn at least the local minimun wage after costs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric is important: Ensuring that workers earn at least the local minimum wage after costs is a fundamental protection of fair work. Platform workers often face significant expenses—such as fuel, maintenance, insurance, or unpaid waiting time—that can reduce their take-home pay below legal minimum standards. A clear commitment to covering these costs and guaranteeing minimum earnings ensures that workers’ take-home pay does not fall below legal minimum standards.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point (location-based platform/AI):<br><br>- Payment must be on time and in full.<br>- Workers must earn at least the local minimum wage, or the wage set by collective sectoral agreement (whichever is higher) in the place where they work, in their active hours, after costs.<br>- Evidence may include either (a) a documented policy guaranteeing compliance, or (b) summary statistics of transactions and costs.<br><br>Requirements to score the point (Cloudwork):<br><br>- For hourly-paid work, workers earn at least their local minimum wage after costs.<br><strong>OR</strong><br>- For piece-rate work:<br>The vast majority of workers earn at least their local minimum wage after costs (this can be evidenced either through a policy, or by provision of aggregated earnings data. The ‘vast majority’ of workers is understood as 85% or more of all workers engaged on the platform), and a reasonable estimate of the time it takes to complete each task is provided to each worker before they accept the work.<br><br>For more information on the location-based platform methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre October 2024, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/fairwork-principles-location-based-work/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on the cloudwork methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre June 2024, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/cloudwork-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on the AI methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre July 2023, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/ai-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Local minimun wage+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Local_minimun_wage+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Local_minimun_wage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363467,
      "name": "Fairwork+Local living wage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Local_living_wage.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Local living wage",
      "question": "Does the platform ensure that workers earn at least a local living wage after costs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric is important: A living wage goes beyond legal minimums to guarantee workers a decent standard of living. In many regions, minimum wages are insufficient to cover basic needs such as food, housing, and healthcare. Ensuring workers earn at least a local living wage after costs allows them to cover basic needs and sustain a decent standard of living.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- Workers must earn at least the local living wage, or the wage set by collective sectoral agreement (whichever is higher) in the place where they work, in their active hours, after costs.<br>- Where a living wage does not exist, Fairwork will use the Global Living Wage Coalition’s Anker Methodology to estimate one.<br>- Evidence may include either (a) a documented policy guaranteeing that workers receive at least the local living wage after costs in their active hours, or (b) summary statistics of transaction and cost data showing compliance.<br><br>For more information on the location-based platform methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre October 2024, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/fairwork-principles-location-based-work/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on the AI methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre July 2023, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/ai-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Local living wage+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Local_living_wage+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Local_living_wage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363479,
      "name": "Fairwork+Task specific risk mitigation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Task_specific_risk_mitigation.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Task specific risk mitigation",
      "question": "Does the platform mitigate task specific risk?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric is important: Platform workers are often exposed to task-related risks such as accidents, injuries, exposure to harmful materials, or even crime and violence. Ensuring that workers receive adequate equipment, training, and support—at no additional cost—is essential to safeguarding their health and safety. Providing equipment, training, and support at no cost helps prevent avoidable injuries and shields workers from additional financial burdens.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- Adequate equipment and training are provided to protect workers’ health and safety from task-specific risks, at no additional cost to the worker.<br>- The platform mitigates the risks of lone working by providing adequate support and designing processes with occupational safety and health in mind.<br>- The platform takes meaningful steps to ensure that workers do not suffer significant costs as a result of accident, injury, or disease resulting from work.<br><br>For more information on the methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre October 2024, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/fairwork-principles-location-based-work/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Task specific risk mitigation+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Task_specific_risk_mitigation+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Task_specific_risk_mitigation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363491,
      "name": "Fairwork+Safe condition & safety net",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Safe_condition_safety_net.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Safe condition & safety net",
      "question": "Does the platform ensure safe working conditions and a safety net?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric is important: Platform workers often lack access to basic social protections such as sick pay, parental leave, or compensation for income lost due to unforeseen circumstances. Because many rely on platform work as their main source of income, the absence of such protections exposes them to sudden poverty and financial insecurity. By providing a safety net and ensuring that pay structures and practices do not incentivize risky behavior, it reduces the risk of sudden income shocks from sickness or caregiving and protects workers’ long-term security.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- Platform take meaningful steps towards the social protection of its workers.<br>- Where workers are unable to work for an extended period due to unexpected circumstances, their standing on the platform is not negatively impacted. <br>- The platform implements policies or practices that protect workers’ safety from task-specific risks. In particular, the platform should ensure that pay is not structured in a way that incentivizes workers to take excessive levels of risk.<br><br>For more information on the methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre October 2024, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/fairwork-principles-location-based-work/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Safe condition & safety net+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Safe_condition_safety_net+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Safe_condition_safety_net+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363503,
      "name": "Fairwork+Transparent terms & conditions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Transparent_terms_conditions.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Transparent terms & conditions",
      "question": "Does the platform provide clear and transparent terms and conditions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric is important: The terms and conditions governing platform work are not always clear and accessible to workers. Clear and transparent contracts are essential for protecting workers’ rights and ensuring accountability in platform work. When terms and conditions are written in accessible language, identify the contracting party, and remain easily available at all times, workers can properly understand the basis of their employment relationship and seek legal recourse if needed. Transparent contracts also prevent unfair practices, such as hidden clauses or exploitative data use, and ensure that workers can fully understand their rights and hold platforms accountable.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- The party contracting with the worker must be identified in the contract, and subject to the law of the country/state/region in which the worker works.<br>- The contract/terms &amp; conditions are presented in full in clear and comprehensible language that all workers could be expected to understand.<br>- Workers have to sign a contract and/or give informed consent to terms of conditions upon signing up for the platform.<br>- The contracts/terms and conditions are easily accessible to workers in paper form, or via the app/platform interface at all times.<br>- Contracts/terms &amp; conditions do not include clauses that revert prevailing legal frameworks in the respective countries.<br>- The platform has a documented data protection and management policy that is adequate, responsible, and ethical. This policy should cover aspects such as legitimacy and lawfulness, proportionality, purpose limitation, transparency, quality, data subject’s rights (access, rectification, evaluation, erasure, portability), accountability, and collective rights.<br><br>For more information on the methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre October 2024, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/fairwork-principles-location-based-work/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Transparent terms & conditions+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Transparent_terms_conditions+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Transparent_terms_conditions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363515,
      "name": "Fairwork+No unfair contract terms",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+No_unfair_contract_terms.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "No unfair contract terms",
      "question": "Does the platform ensure that no unfair contract terms are imposed?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric is important: In some cases, especially under ‘independent contractor’ classifications, workers carry a disproportionate amount of risk, including liability for damages and restrictions on seeking legal redress. Unfair contract terms can shift these risks further onto workers, leaving them responsible for harms beyond their control. Ensuring that contracts are balanced, transparent, and free from exploitative clauses is essential to protecting workers’ rights and dignity. By sharing risks more fairly and safeguarding access to grievance mechanisms, this protects workers from excessive liability and gives them real avenues for redress.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- Every worker is notified of proposed changes in clear and understandable language within a reasonable timeframe before changes come into effect; and the changes should not reverse existing accrued benefits and reasonable expectations on which workers have relied.<br>- The contract/terms and conditions neither include clauses which exclude liability for negligence nor unreasonably exempt the platform from liability for working conditions. The platform takes appropriate steps to ensure that the contract does not include clauses which prevent workers from effectively seeking redress for grievances which arise from the working relationship.<br>- In case platform labour is mediated by subcontractors: The platform implements a reliable mechanism to monitor and ensure that the subcontractor is living up to the standards expected from the platform itself regarding working conditions.<br>- In cases where algorithms are used to determine pricing, bonuses, ratingsand/or allocate jobs, the data collected, and calculations used must be transparent and documented in a form available to workers in clear and comprehensible language that all workers could be expected to understand.<br><br>For more information on the methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre October 2024, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/fairwork-principles-location-based-work/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+No unfair contract terms+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+No_unfair_contract_terms+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+No_unfair_contract_terms+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363527,
      "name": "Fairwork+Due process in decisions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Due_process_in_decisions.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Due process in decisions",
      "question": "Does the platform provide due process for decisions affecting workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric is important: Platform workers can experience arbitrary deactivation, being barred from accessing the platform without explanation and potentially losing their income. They may also face other penalties or disciplinary decisions without the ability to challenge them. Without due process, workers risk sudden loss of income and unfair treatment, with little or no recourse. Providing clear, accessible channels for communication and appeals ensures that workers can contest disciplinary decisions and resolve disputes fairly, protecting them from arbitrary deactivation and sudden loss of income.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point (location-based platform):<br><br>- There is an easily accessible channel for workers to communicate with a human representative of the platform and to effectively solve problems. This channel is documented in the contract and available on the platform interface. Platforms should respond to workers within a reasonable timeframe.<br>- There is a process for workers to meaningfully and effectively appeal low ratings, non-payment, payment issues, deactivations, and other penalties and disciplinary actions. This process is documented in a contract and available on the platform interface. It should include the option of escalating grievances that have not been satisfactorily addressed and, in the case of automated decisions, should have the option of escalating it for human mediation.<br>- In the case of deactivations, the appeals process must be available to workers who no longer have access to the platform.<br>- Workers are not disadvantaged for voicing concerns or appealing disciplinary actions.<br><br>Requirements to score the point (Cloudwork):<br><br>- There is a channel for workers to communicate with a human representative of the platform. This channel is documented in policies that are easily accessible to workers, and communications are responded to within a reasonable timeframe.<br>- There is documentation of things the worker isn’t allowed to do, and workers receive an explanation for all punitive actions, including reductions in their rating/platform standing, non-payment, work rejections, penalties, account blocks, deactivation and any other disciplinary actions.<br>- Explanations for punitive actions and work rejections include information on how they can be appealed.<br>- The process for workers to appeal punitive actions and work rejections is non-arduous, documented in the contract, and available to workers who no longer have access to the platform.<br><br>For more information on the location-based platform methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre October 2024, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/fairwork-principles-location-based-work/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on the cloudwork methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre June 2024, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/cloudwork-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Due process in decisions+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Due_process_in_decisions+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Due_process_in_decisions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363539,
      "name": "Fairwork+Equitable management practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Equitable_management_practices.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Equitable management practices",
      "question": "Does the platform provide equity in the management process?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric is important: Even when platforms do not intend to discriminate, their design and management practices can reinforce existing inequalities and exclude disadvantaged groups. Ensuring equity means going beyond non-discrimination policies to actively remove barriers, promote inclusion, and provide fair opportunities for all workers. Transparent processes, fair algorithmic design, and measures against user bias help ensure equal access to work and pay for disadvantaged groups.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point (location-based platform):<br><br>- The platform has an effective anti-discrimination policy laying out a clear process for reporting, correcting and penalising discrimination of workers on the platform on grounds such as race, social origin, caste, ethnicity, nationality, gender, sex, gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, disability, religion or belief, age or any other status.<br>- The platform has measures in place to promote diversity, equality and inclusion on the platform. It takes practical measures to promote equality of opportunity for workers from disadvantaged groups, including reasonable accommodation for pregnancy, disability, and religion or belief.<br>- Where persons from a disadvantaged group (such as women) are significantly under-represented among a pool of workers, it seeks to identify and remove barriers to access by persons from that group.<br>If algorithms are used to determine access to work or remuneration or the type of work and - pay scales available to workers seeking to use the platform, these are transparent and do not result in inequitable outcomes for workers from historically or currently disadvantaged groups.<br>- It has mechanisms to reduce the risk of users discriminating against workers from disadvantaged groups in accessing and carrying out work.<br><br>Requirements to score the point (Cloudwork):<br><br>- There is a policy which guarantees that the platform will not discriminate against persons on the grounds of racial, ethnic, social or minority background, caste, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, language, gender, gender identity, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, geographical location, or any other status.<br>- There are mechanisms to reduce the risk of clients discriminating against workers on any basis listed above.<br>- The platform specifies the methods used to manage and allocate work (including when algorithms are used). Substantive changes to methods of managing and allocating work are preceded by a worker consultation.\"<br><br>For more information on the location-based platform methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre October 2024, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/fairwork-principles-location-based-work/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on the cloudwork methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre June 2024, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/cloudwork-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Equitable management practices+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Equitable_management_practices+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Equitable_management_practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363551,
      "name": "Fairwork+Freedom of association & worker voice",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Freedom_of_association_worker_voice.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Freedom of association & worker voice",
      "question": "Does the platform assure freedom of association and the expression of worker voice?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric is important: Freedom of association and collective voice are fundamental labour rights, recognised by the ILO and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. They enable workers to organise, express their concerns, and negotiate fairer conditions without fear of retaliation. Yet rates of organisation among platform workers remain low. Guaranteeing these rights and creating formal mechanisms for worker voice enables workers to organise collectively, raise concerns, and negotiate better conditions without fear of retaliation.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- There is a documented mechanism for the expression of collective worker voice that allows ALL workers, regardless of employment status, to participate without risks. It will allow workers to participate in the setting of agendas so as to be able to table issues that most concern them. This mechanism can be in physical or virtual form (e.g. online meetings) and should involve meaningful interaction (e.g. not surveys). It should also allow for ALL workers to participate in regular meetings with the management.<br>- There is a formal, written statement of willingness to recognise, and bargain with, a collective, independent body of workers or trade union, that is clearly communicated to all workers, and available on the platform interface.<br>- Freedom of association is not inhibited, and workers are not disadvantaged in any way for communicating their concerns, wishes and demands to the platform, or expressing willingness to form independent collective bodies of representation. <br><br>For more information on the location-based platform methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre October 2024, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/fairwork-principles-location-based-work/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on the AI methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre July 2023, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/ai-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Freedom of association & worker voice+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Freedom_of_association_worker_voice+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Freedom_of_association_worker_voice+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363563,
      "name": "Fairwork+Support for democratic governance",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Support_for_democratic_governance.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Support for democratic governance",
      "question": "Does the platform support democratic governance?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric is important: While overall rates of organisation among platform workers remain low, worker associations are emerging across many sectors and countries, alongside a growing number of cooperative, worker-owned platforms.Ensuring fair representation means giving workers a genuine say in shaping their conditions, whether through collective bargaining, elected councils, or cooperative governance, so that they have real influence over the terms of their work.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- Workers play a meaningful role in governing it.<br>- In a written document available at all times on the platform interface, the platform publicly and formally recognises an independent collective body of workers, an elected works council, or trade union. This recognition is not exclusive and, when the legal framework allows, the platform should recognise any significant collective body seeking representation. If workers choose to seek representation from an independent collective body of workers or union that is not readily recognized by the platform, the platform should then be open to adopt multiple channels of representation, when the legal framework allows, or seek ways to implement workers’ queries to its communication with the existing representative body.<br><br>For more information on the location-based platform methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre October 2024, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/fairwork-principles-location-based-work/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on the AI methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre July 2023, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/ai-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Support for democratic governance+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Support_for_democratic_governance+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Support_for_democratic_governance+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363575,
      "name": "Fairwork+Payment reliability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Payment_reliability.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Payment reliability",
      "question": "Does the platform pay workers on time and for all the completed work?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric matters: Workers must have full confidence that they will be paid for the work they do. Too often, platform workers face the risk of clients withholding payment even when tasks have been completed. To achieve this standard, platforms must guarantee that non-payment is not an option. Where work is disputed, there must be a clear and reasonable process for rejection decisions. In addition, payment must be both timely and regular. Ensuring reliable, predictable remuneration is essential to evidencing fair pay and building worker trust in the platform.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- Non-payment is not an option for clients and there are mechanisms to ensure workers are paid.<br>- Payments are made within an agreed timeframe.<br>- Workers can choose to be paid in a recognised national currency.<br>- Workers can request funds from their account on a regular basis with reasonable withdrawal thresholds.<br><br>For more information on the methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre June 2024, please see this [[http://https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/cloudwork-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Payment reliability+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Payment_reliability+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Payment_reliability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363587,
      "name": "Fairwork+Precarity & overwork",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Precarity_overwork.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Precarity & overwork",
      "question": "Does the platform mitigate precarity and overwork?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric matters: Platform workers often spend large portions of their day applying for jobs, sending credentials, or developing pitches—time that counts as work but goes unpaid. This problem is intensified when there is an oversupply of labour and too few jobs available. To reduce precarity and overwork, platforms should manage the allocation of work and the entry of new workers in ways that promote job availability and minimise unpaid working time.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- The allocation of work and/or supply of new workers is managed to promote job availability, and reduce unpaid work and overwork (this could include regular guaranteed hours, managed supply and demand, or minimum and maximum hours).<br><br>For more information on the methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre June 2024, please see this [[http://https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/cloudwork-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Precarity & overwork+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Precarity_overwork+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Precarity_overwork+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363599,
      "name": "Fairwork+Health & safety risk",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Health_safety_risk.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Health & safety risk",
      "question": "Does the platform mitigate health and safety risks?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric matters: Platform work can expose workers to a wide range of health and safety risks, from physical dangers and financial scams to breaches of data privacy or exposure to harmful content. Protecting workers requires clear policies, proactive risk assessments, and transparent communication of risks before tasks are accepted. Platforms must also provide reporting channels and enforce penalties against clients who jeopardise worker safety. Ensuring strong protections not only reduces harm but also fosters a safer, more sustainable platform economy.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- There are policies to protect workers from risks that arise from the processes of work.<br>- There are processes for job-related health and safety risks (including psychological risks) to be identified and addressed.<br>- Risks related to a specific job are flagged to workers before they accept the job (such as indicating that they might be exposed to violent content).<br>- There are clear reporting channels and documented penalties for clients who jeopardise workers’ health and safety.<br>- There are adequate and ethical data privacy and security measures applicable to workers, laid out in a documented policy. To fulfil this criterion, platforms must have clear policies about what kind of data is collected from workers, when it is collected, how long it is kept, and how it is processed. They must take responsibility of data handling, storing and management processes, and ensure that personal data is kept safe and secure and is not sold or shared with third parties, without workers’ specific consent.<br><br>For more information on the methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre June 2024, please see this [[http://https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/cloudwork-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Health & safety risk+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Health_safety_risk+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Health_safety_risk+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363611,
      "name": "Fairwork+Clear terms & condtions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Clear_terms_condtions.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Clear terms & condtions",
      "question": "Does the platform provide clear terms and conditions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric matters: Workers must be able to clearly understand and access the conditions of their work. When contracts are written in complex or inaccessible language, workers may be unaware of their rights or vulnerable to unfair practices. Platforms should therefore provide terms and conditions in clear, accessible language, notify workers of changes in advance, and avoid clauses that strip workers of accrued benefits or legal recourse. Transparent and accessible contracts are essential for fair and accountable platform work.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- The contract is written in clear and comprehensible language that the worker could be expected to understand.<br>- The contract is available for workers to access at all times.<br>- Workers are notified of proposed changes in a reasonable timeframe before changes come into effect.<br>- Changes should not reverse existing accrued benefits and reasonable expectations on which workers have relied.<br>- The contract does not require workers to waive rights to reasonable legal recourse against the platform.<br><br>For more information on the methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre June 2024, please see this [[http://https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/cloudwork-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Clear terms & condtions+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Clear_terms_condtions+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Clear_terms_condtions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363623,
      "name": "Fairwork+Contract consistency",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Contract_consistency.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Contract consistency",
      "question": "Does the platform provide consistent contracts with workers’ terms of engagement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric matters: Platforms mediate the relationship between workers and clients, and therefore have a duty to ensure that contracts are fair and consistent with workers’ terms of engagement. This includes protecting workers from restrictive clauses, such as non-compete agreements, and ensuring they retain the freedom to choose their schedules and the tasks they accept. Clear oversight of contracts helps safeguard workers’ rights, prevents unfair disadvantages, and promotes genuine autonomy in platform work.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- Clients are encouraged to inform workers about how their work will be used.<br>- The worker is not subject to non-compete clauses.<br><br>Except in cases where the worker is in a standard employment relationship the platform makes clear to workers and clients that:<br><br>- Working schedules cannot be imposed upon workers.<br>- The worker retains the freedom to choose which tasks to accept or refuse.<br>- When workers choose not to accept tasks, this does not punitively impact their rating or reputation.<br><br>For more information on the methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre June 2024, please see this [[http://https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/cloudwork-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Contract consistency+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Contract_consistency+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Contract_consistency+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363635,
      "name": "Fairwork+Worker representation & association",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Worker_representation_association.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Worker representation & association",
      "question": "Does the platform provide workers access to representation and freedom of association?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric matters: Workers must be able to raise concerns and defend their rights without fear of retaliation. Access to representation ensures that workers can rely on independent support in disputes, while freedom of association guarantees their right to organise collectively. These protections, rooted in international human rights and labour standards, are essential for giving workers a voice in how platforms are managed and ensuring their interests are fairly represented.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- The platform commits to a dispute resolution process in which workers can access an independent representative freely chosen by them or an unbiased, independent, and accessible dispute resolution system. The platform publicly commits to support any effort by its workers to collectively organise or form a trade union. <br>- Freedom of association is not inhibited and groups of workers are not disadvantaged in any way for communicating their concerns, demands and wishes to management.<br><br>For more information on the methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre June 2024, please see this [[http://https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/cloudwork-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Worker representation & association+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Worker_representation_association+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Worker_representation_association+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363646,
      "name": "Fairwork+Collective Bargaining",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Collective_Bargaining.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Collective Bargaining",
      "question": "Does the platform ensure there is collective governance or bargaining?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric matters: Collective representation allows workers to organise, bargain, and shape the conditions under which they work. Platforms that recognise or engage with independent worker organisations, unions, or democratically governed bodies ensure that workers’ voices are not only heard but acted upon. Where such structures do not exist, platforms have a responsibility to support dialogue that enables workers to build them. Strengthening collective governance empowers workers and lays the foundation for fairer, more sustainable platform work.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- It is democratically governed by workers.<br>- It formally engages with an independent collective body of workers, an elected works council or trade union, and has not refused to engage with collective bodies who seek representation and/or bargaining. New workers are advised of the existence of these bodies.<br>- If such a body does not exist, or such bodies have not requested recognition by the platform, the platform has engaged in a formal process of dialogue with local and/or international representative bodies of workers to discuss what structures and processes of representation could look like for platform workers.<br><br>For more information on the methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre June 2024, please see this [[http://https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/cloudwork-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Collective Bargaining+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Collective_Bargaining+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Collective_Bargaining+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363658,
      "name": "Fairwork+Working conditions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Working_conditions.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Working conditions",
      "question": "Does the employer ensure safe working conditions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric matters: Workers face a variety of health and safety risks, ranging from physical strain to psychological harm. Without safeguards, platform work can expose workers to exhaustion, stress, traumatic content, or unsafe workloads. Employers have a responsibility to identify these risks, communicate them clearly before tasks are accepted, and implement protections such as limits on working hours, breaks, and fair shift arrangements. Ensuring protection from task-specific risks is essential for safeguarding workers’ health and dignity in AI-mediated workplaces.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- Implement policies and practices that protect workers’ safety from task specific risks. This should, at a minimum, account for well-evidenced risks such as:<br>High job strain, which can lead to a range of negative health impacts including cardiovascular disease and mental health disorders. <br>Secondary traumatic stress, which can be associated with repeated exposure to traumatic content. <br>Muscular skeletal injuries, which may emerge as a result of unsuitable equipment, excessive workload or perverse incentivisation in physical jobs.<br>- Risks related to a specific job are flagged to workers before they accept the job (such as indicating that they might be exposed to violent content.) <br>- The employer places a maximum limit on standard working time that meets either the applicable national regulation or, in cases where there is no applicable national regulation, the ILO standard of 40 hours a week.<br>- Workers are entitled to take breaks during working time that is defined under the applicable national regulation, or in cases where there is no applicable national regulation, is equivalent to a minimum of one hour for every eight hours worked.<br>- If the work arrangements require workers to work in shifts, workers are given the option to choose their shifts, and reasonable accommodations are made for workers with additional needs due to health, safety and other personal reasons <br><br>For more information on the methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre July 2023, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/ai-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Working conditions+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Working_conditions+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Working_conditions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363670,
      "name": "Fairwork+Paid leave & safety net",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Paid_leave_safety_net.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Paid leave & safety net",
      "question": "Does the employer ensure paid leave and a safety net?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric matters: Workers risk sudden loss of income due to illness, injury, or personal circumstances beyond their control. Without adequate protections, this can quickly lead to poverty and insecurity. Employers have a responsibility to provide paid leave, healthcare access where public systems do not cover it, and compensation for periods when workers are unable to work. A strong safety net not only reduces vulnerability but also ensures that workers can maintain their health and livelihoods with dignity.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- Workers have access to paid time-off (such as bereavement, parental, sick and annual leave.)<br>- Where core medical treatment is not provided by a public system, such as a national healthcare scheme, the employer makes a meaningful provision to the health care costs of its workers<br><br>For more information on the methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre July 2023, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/ai-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Job Security"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Paid leave & safety net+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Paid_leave_safety_net+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Paid_leave_safety_net+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363682,
      "name": "Fairwork+Decent contracts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Decent_contracts.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Decent contracts",
      "question": "Does the employer provide decent contracts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric matters: Contracts are the foundation of fair employment. When contracts are unclear, temporary, or impose unfair conditions, workers face insecurity and risk to their well-being. Ensuring decent contracts means workers understand their terms, can access them easily, and are legally protected under the law where they work. Providing fair and stable agreements reduces precarity and gives workers the security they need to plan their lives and work with confidence.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- Workers must sign a contract and/or give informed consent to terms of conditions upon signing up, and for each subsequent contract extension.<br>- The contract or terms and conditions is presented in full, in clear and comprehensible language that all workers could be expected to understand.<br>- The contract or terms and conditions are easily accessible to workers in paper and/or electronic form. If these conditions differ for different contract types, reasonable steps are taken to inform workers about the differences in contract types.<br>- The party employing the worker must be identified in the contract or terms and conditions, and subject to the law of the place in which the worker works.<br>- Workers working on long-term projects that exceed the probation time are provided with the option to sign an employment contract lasting at a minimum the same length of time as the project.<br>- The contracts or terms and conditions do not include clauses that revert prevailing legal frameworks in the countries where workers work.<br><br>For more information on the methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre July 2023, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/ai-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Decent contracts+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Decent_contracts+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Decent_contracts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363694,
      "name": "Fairwork+Secure employment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Secure_employment.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Secure employment",
      "question": "Does the employer provide secure employment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric matters: While fixed-term contracts may suit some circumstances, secure employment provides workers with stability, protection, and fairer treatment. Offering pathways to permanent contracts, ensuring equal conditions across contract types, and providing fair severance and retraining opportunities all help reduce precarity. Employers also have a duty to ensure that subcontracted workers enjoy the same protections. Secure employment strengthens worker security and promotes fairer, more sustainable working relationships.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- Workers with three years or more of consistent short-term employment should be provided with the option to move onto permanent contracts if they so desire.<br>- The employer should make reasonable adjustments in wages and conditions between both: fixed-term and permanent employees and outsourced workers; and any outsourced or indirectly employed workers and directly employed workers. Workers who are outsourced or indirectly employed should be compensated for additional costs incurred, including visa/work permits and their extensions, insurance, pensions, and other social security premiums.<br>- In cases of justified redundancy or contract non-renewal, the employer should provide workers with severance allowance commensurate with tenure at the company and retraining opportunities. In cases where the redundancies are being made because reasons of an economic, technological, structural or similar nature, workers or their representatives are consulted, and steps are taken to minimise the resulting redundancies.<br>- If desired, workers should be able to invite worker representatives to their end of contract meetings with the relevant HR departments.<br>- In the case of subcontracting arrangements, where part or all of the work is subcontracted to other companies, management implements a reliable mechanism to monitor and ensure that the subcontractor is living up to the standards expected from the company itself regarding working conditions.<br><br>For more information on the methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre July 2023, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/ai-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Employment Contracts"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Secure employment+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Secure_employment+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Secure_employment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363706,
      "name": "Fairwork+Fair treatment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fair_treatment.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Fair treatment",
      "question": "Does the employer treat workers fairly?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric matters: The workplace relationship often places significant power in the hands of employers and managers, creating risks of discrimination, harassment, or unfair treatment. Ensuring fair treatment means protecting workers from bullying, harassment, and discrimination of any kind, while also safeguarding their right to voice concerns and appeal disciplinary measures without retaliation. These protections are fundamental to building respectful, inclusive, and equitable workplaces.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- Management should refrain from deploying any form of depersonalised bullying or mobbing in order to ensure organisational goals are met.<br>- There is a policy in place which guarantees that any form of harassment in the workplace will not be tolerated.<br>- There is a policy in place which guarantees that the employer will not discriminate against persons on the grounds of racial, ethnic, social or minority background, caste, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, language, gender, gender identity, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, geographical location, or any other status.<br>- Workers should have the right to appeal dismissals and other disciplinary measures.<br>- Workers are not disadvantaged for voicing concerns or appealing disciplinary actions.<br><br>For more information on the methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre July 2023, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/ai-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Discrimination and Harassment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Fair treatment+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fair_treatment+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fair_treatment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363718,
      "name": "Fairwork+Data management & appeals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Data_management_appeals.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Data management & appeals",
      "question": "Does the employer create clear and effective systems for data management, explanations, and appeals?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Fairwork project is an action-research initiative that examines how technological changes shape working conditions worldwide. By evaluating digital platforms and employers against principles of fairness—such as minimum wage after costs, safe working conditions, fair contracts, non-discriminatory management, and collective representation—Fairwork produces ratings and rankings that highlight good practices and expose labour standards in the platform economy. Its goal is to help shape a fairer future of work for all.<br><br>Why this metric matters: As workplaces become increasingly shaped by AI and data-driven management, protecting workers’ rights to transparency, explanation, and appeal is essential. Without safeguards, automated systems can lead to unfair decisions, invasive surveillance, or excessive data collection. Employers must therefore provide clear explanations of algorithmic decisions, create fair channels for appeals, and respect data privacy principles. These measures ensure accountability, protect worker autonomy, and help prevent the misuse of technology in the workplace.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>Requirements to score the point:<br><br>- Where AI systems are involved in work, employers must create explainability mechanisms such as transparency reports or question and answer processes that allow workers to understand both the model behaviour of the system as a whole and specific decisions.<br>- Workers must be able to appeal decisions made by AI systems through a multi-stakeholder process that reflects collective worker voice, and successful appeals to lead not only that specific decision being revised but also wider revisions of decision-making process.<br>- Management avoids excessive surveillance in the workplace, and avoids use of invasive technologies.<br>- Workers must not be subject to excessive data collection practices and should be informed about the data that is being collected about them. Employers must apply the principle of data minimisation (collecting the minimum amount of personal data required to fulfil a legitimate purpose) in their collection processes.<br><br>For more information on the methodology, including previous versions applying to research pre July 2023, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/ai-principles/ | page]].<br><br>For more information on how the data is collected and analyzed, please see this [[https://fair.work/en/fw/methodology/ | page]].</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Fairwork+Data management & appeals+Fairwork Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Data_management_appeals+Fairwork_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Data_management_appeals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363777,
      "name": "BankTrack+1.1 Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+1_1_Policy.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "1.1 Policy",
      "question": "Has the bank adopted a statement of policy through which it expresses its commitment to respect human rights?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.<br>\n<br>\nWhy this metric is important: A policy statement clearly committing to respect all internationally recognised human rights is an important signal to those inside and outside a bank that management understands that respect for human rights is a minimum standard for conducting business with legitimacy.",
      "methodology": "Requirements for full and half score: <br>\n<br>\nFull score: A written commitment to \"respect\" human rights, as part of a statement of policy.<br>\n<br>\nHalf score: The bank has a statement or policy addressing human rights, but this does not include a commitment to respect human rights.<br>\nOr, the bank has a commitment to respect human rights but not as part of a formal statement of policy (e.g. in reporting)<br>\n<br>\nFull methodology can be found in the [[https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds|report]].",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "BankTrack+1.1 Policy+BankTrack Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+1_1_Policy+BankTrack_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+1_1_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363789,
      "name": "BankTrack+1.2 Policy approval",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+1_2_Policy_approval.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "1.2 Policy approval",
      "question": "Is the bankʼs human rights policy commitment approved at the most senior level of the business?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.<br>\n<br>\nWhy this metric is important: The UN Guiding Principles state that a business’ human rights policy should be approved at the most senior level of the business enterprise. Ensuring senior management attention to and accountability for human rights is likely to help ensure policies and procedures are effective, as is also recognised by the Corporate Human Rights Bench- mark, with which this criterion is aligned.",
      "methodology": "Requirements for full and half score:<br>\n<br>\nFull score: The bankʼs human rights policy commitment is approved by the Board or the CEO by name <strong>AND</strong> a Board member or Board committee is tasked with specific governance oversight of one or more areas of respect for human rights.<br>\n<br>\nHalf score: The bankʼs human rights commitment is explicitly approved by the Board or the CEO by name, but without a Board member or committee being tasked with governance, or vice versa. Or, the bank meets the criteria for a full score, but its policy commitment does not meet the standard of a commitment to respect human rights in 1.1.<br>\n<br>\nFull methodology can be found in the [[https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds|report]].",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "BankTrack+1.2 Policy approval+BankTrack Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+1_2_Policy_approval+BankTrack_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+1_2_Policy_approval+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363801,
      "name": "BankTrack+1.3 Scope of policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+1_3_Scope_of_policy.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "1.3 Scope of policy",
      "question": "Does the bank's policy commitment stipulate the bank's human rights expectations of personnel, business partners and other parties directly linked to its operations, products or services - including the bank's client and investee relationships?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.<br>\n<br>\nWhy this metric is important: Most of a bank’s significant human rights impacts are likely to stem from its core activity, its provision of finance. This requirement tests whether a bank’s human rights policy is broadly applied, particularly in relation to the bank’s financing activities, including its lending, underwriting and asset management. It is important to note that guidance from the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the OECD has made clear that the responsibility to respect human rights also extends to minority shareholdings, and to situations where a bank acts as a custodian of shares, but is not the beneficial owner.",
      "methodology": "Requirements for full and half score:<br>\n<br>\nFull score: The bank's human rights commitment extends to its provision of finance, as source of the banking sectorʼs most significant potential human rights impacts, alongside personnel and other parties such as suppliers.<br>\n<br>\nHalf score: For example, the bank's human rights commitment extends to some but not all of its finance (e.g. asset management is excluded). Or, the bankʼs commitment extends to its provision of finance, but does not meet the standard of a commitment to respect human rights in 1.1.<br>\n<br>\nFull methodology can be found in the [[https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds|report]].",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "BankTrack+1.3 Scope of policy+BankTrack Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+1_3_Scope_of_policy+BankTrack_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+1_3_Scope_of_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363813,
      "name": "BankTrack+2.1 Due diligence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_1_Due_diligence.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "2.1 Due diligence",
      "question": "Does the bank describe how it carries out human rights due diligence?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.<br>\n<br>\nWhy this metric is important: Human rights due diligence (HRDD) is at the heart of the UN Guiding Principles approach to identifying, avoiding and mitigating adverse human rights impacts. Businesses including banks need to “know and show” that they respect human rights, and to do this they should describe how they carry out HRDD.",
      "methodology": "Requirements for full and half score:<br>\n<br>\nFull score: The bank describes how it carries out human rights due diligence, for example describing its process for identifying and assessing human rights impacts and its decision-making criteria. This extends across its entire business operations, including impacts linked to the bankʼs finance.<br>\n<br>\nHalf score: The bank describes how it carries out human rights due diligence, but this is limited in scope to certain sectors or business areas only.<br>\n<br>\nFull methodology can be found in the [[https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds|report]].",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "BankTrack+2.1 Due diligence+BankTrack Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_1_Due_diligence+BankTrack_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_1_Due_diligence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363825,
      "name": "BankTrack+2.2 Consultation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_2_Consultation.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "2.2 Consultation",
      "question": "Does the bank show how its process for identifying and assessing human rights impacts involves meaningful consultation with potentially affected groups and other relevant stakeholders?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.<br>\n<br>\nWhy this metric is important: Enterprises need to understand, as far as possible, the concerns of those who may be directly affected by their operations.26 This requirement considers whether banks are taking the views of rights-holders into account when identifying actual or potential adverse human rights impacts.",
      "methodology": "Requirements for full and half score:<br>\n<br>\nFull score: The bank details how its process for identifying impacts involves meaningful consultation with potentially affected groups. For example, the bank assesses the quality of consultations conducted by clients, and supplements this with its own direct consultation where this is insufficient, or in other high risk circumstances.<br>\n<br>\nHalf score: For example, the bank details a process for identifying impacts which includes consultation, but this is limited to certain groups of stakeholders or business divisions. For example, potentially affected groups are not involved.<br>\n<br>\nFull methodology can be found in the [[https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds|report]].",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social Dialogue & Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Just Transition"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "BankTrack+2.2 Consultation+BankTrack Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_2_Consultation+BankTrack_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_2_Consultation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363837,
      "name": "BankTrack+2.3 Allocating responsibility",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_3_Allocating_responsibility.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "2.3 Allocating responsibility",
      "question": "Does the bank clearly allocate responsibility for addressing human rights impacts to specific levels and functions within the business enterprise?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.<br>\n<br>\nWhy this metric is important: Allocating responsibility for addressing human rights impacts clearly in a bank’s due diligence process is part of ensuring that the findings of the bank’s impact assessments are effectively integrated across the business. Describing the differentiated responsibilities of staff and the referral and escalation processes is an indicator of a well-elaborated due diligence process.",
      "methodology": "Requirements for full and half score:<br>\n<br>\nFull score: The bank details differentiated responsibilities of staff in different functions (e.g. business development, relationship managers, analysts, ESG staff) including referral and escalation processes and ultimate responsibilities.<br>\n<br>\nHalf score: For example, the bank details limited information on the main teams responsible for assessing human rights due diligence.<br>\n<br>\nFull methodology can be found in the [[https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds|report]].",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "BankTrack+2.3 Allocating responsibility+BankTrack Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_3_Allocating_responsibility+BankTrack_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_3_Allocating_responsibility+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363849,
      "name": "BankTrack+2.4 Assessing relationship to impact",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_4_Assessing_relationship_to_impact.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "2.4 Assessing relationship to impact",
      "question": "Does the bank have a process for assessing whether it has caused or contributed to an adverse impact?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.<br>\n<br>\nWhy this metric is important: Under Principle 13 of the UN Guiding Principles, a business’ relationship to a human rights impact – whether causing or contributing to it through its own activity, or being directly linked via its business relationships – determines whether it has a responsibility to participate in remedy. As made clear by UN and other authoritative advice, banks, in certain cases, may contribute to adverse human rights impacts through their financing. To understand how best to address impacts, and if they have a responsibility to remedy, banks must have a systematic process in place to assess their relationships to an impact.",
      "methodology": "Requirements for full and half score:<br>\n<br>\nFull score: The bank has a process in place for assessing whether it has caused or contributed to an adverse impact, and details the process, including decision-making criteria and lines of responsibility. This process is applicable across the bankʼs entire business operations, including impacts linked to the bankʼs finance. <br>\n<br>\nHalf score: For example, the bank indicates that it assesses whether it has caused or contributed to an adverse impact as part of its human rights due diligence, without detailing the process.<br>\n<br>\nFull methodology can be found in the [[https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds|report]].",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "BankTrack+2.4 Assessing relationship to impact+BankTrack Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_4_Assessing_relationship_to_impact+BankTrack_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_4_Assessing_relationship_to_impact+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363861,
      "name": "BankTrack+2.5 tracking effectiveness",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_5_tracking_effectiveness.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "2.5 tracking effectiveness",
      "question": "Does the bank verify whether adverse human rights impacts are being addressed, by tracking the effectiveness of its response?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.<br>\n<br>\nWhy this metric is important: As outlined in the official guidance to the UN Guiding Principles: “what gets measured gets managed”. Tracking and measuring if specific actions are successful in addressing impacts is a crucial aspect of a comprehensive due diligence process. Banks ought to have systems in place to verify their responses to identified impacts are effective and their actions are making a difference. Transparent disclosure of what these systems entail demonstrates to stakeholders that the bank takes addressing impacts seriously and holds itself account- able for meaningful action.",
      "methodology": "Requirements for full and half score:<br>\n<br>\nFull score: The bank describes a process for tracking the effectiveness of its response to adverse human rights impacts to verify whether they are being addressed. This process details indicators and draws on feedback from internal and external sources, including affected stakeholders. It is applicable across the bankʼs entire business operations, including impacts linked to the bankʼs finance.<br>\n<br>\nHalf score: For example, the bank describes a process for tracking effectiveness of its response to adverse human rights impacts, but: this is limited in scope to impacts arising from certain business activities or sectors; indicators are not detailed; or the process does not include feedback from internal and external sources.<br>\n<br>\nFull methodology can be found in the [[https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds|report]].",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "BankTrack+2.5 tracking effectiveness+BankTrack Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_5_tracking_effectiveness+BankTrack_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_5_tracking_effectiveness+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363873,
      "name": "BankTrack+3.1 Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+3_1_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "3.1 Reporting",
      "question": "Does the bank report formally on how it addresses risks of severe human rights impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.<br>\n<br>\nWhy this metric is important: Banks need to communicate how their commitment to respect human rights is implemented in practice. Reporting on human rights, whether in a stand-alone human rights report or integrated with other reporting, is needed for banks to show the impact of their policies in terms of practical action to manage, prevent and mitigate risks of severe human rights impacts.",
      "methodology": "Requirements for full and half score: <br>\n<br>\nFull score: The bank reports formally on how it addresses its main risks of human rights impacts.<br>\n<br>\nHalf score: The bank reports on some internal human rights developments (e.g. policy developments, training carried out, data on human rights related internal complaints), but this does not include reporting on how it addresses its main risks of human rights impacts. Or, the bank reports formally on what its main risks of human rights impacts are, but it doesnʼt detail how it addresses them.<br>\n<br>\nFull methodology can be found in the [[https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds|report]].",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "BankTrack+3.1 Reporting+BankTrack Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+3_1_Reporting+BankTrack_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+3_1_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363885,
      "name": "BankTrack+3.2 Adequacy of response",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+3_2_Adequacy_of_response.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "3.2 Adequacy of response",
      "question": "Does the bank's reporting provide information that is sufficient to evaluate the adequacy of its response to particular human rights impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.<br>\n<br>\nWhy this metric is important: To respect human rights, banks need to take steps to avoid or prevent specific human rights impacts occurring, and to address or mitigate such impacts when they do occur. Strong human rights reporting from banks, including specific examples of how impacts are prioritised and dealt with, signals transparency and accountability to relevant stakeholders, including affected people and investors. To be meaningful, reporting should be detailed enough to demonstrate actions taken were adequate in addressing impacts. By selecting examples for reporting thoughtfully and explaining their relevance, banks can demonstrate they prioritise<br>\nthe most severe, and those where delayed response would make them irremediable, in line with the UN Guiding Principles’ recommended approach.",
      "methodology": "Requirements for full and half score:<br>\n<br>\nFull score: The bank reports on how it has sought to address particular human rights impacts, and the reporting is sufficient to evaluate the adequacy of its response (e.g. describing information on sector, geographic location, concrete actions taken, follow-up steps requested from clients or investee companies.) Reporting covers three impacts at least, and where prioritisation is necessary, the bank prioritises impacts that are most severe or where delayed response would make them irremediable.<br>\n<br>\nHalf score: The bank reports on how it has sought to address particular human rights impacts, but the reporting is not sufficient to evaluate the adequacy of the response, is limited to one example, or does not set how impacts are prioritised for reporting (e.g. examples are presented without clarity on how they are selected).<br>\n<br>\nFull methodology can be found in the [[https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds|report]].",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "BankTrack+3.2 Adequacy of response+BankTrack Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+3_2_Adequacy_of_response+BankTrack_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+3_2_Adequacy_of_response+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363897,
      "name": "BankTrack+3.3 Quality of reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+3_3_Quality_of_reporting.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "3.3 Quality of reporting",
      "question": "Does the bankʼs reporting include appropriate indicators and independent verification?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.<br>\n<br>\nWhy this metric is important: To be meaningful, human rights reporting should go beyond a “ticking-the-box” approach. To show stakeholders that they effectively manage risks of severe human rights impacts, banks should comprehensively disclose how they identify and address these risks, including qualitative or quantitative indicators informing their due diligence. Independent third-party verification through auditing can further enhance the credibility and reliability of human rights reporting, ensuring that this reflects a genuine commitment to respect human rights rather than just compliance.",
      "methodology": "Requirements for full and half score:<br>\n<br>\nFull score: The bankʼs human rights reporting is independently verified and includes indicators concerning how it identifies and addresses adverse impacts.<br>\n<br>\nHalf score: The bankʼs human rights reporting is independently verified, or it includes indicators concerning how it identifies and addresses adverse impacts (but not both).<br>\n<br>\nFull methodology can be found in the [[https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds|report]].",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "BankTrack+3.3 Quality of reporting+BankTrack Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+3_3_Quality_of_reporting+BankTrack_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+3_3_Quality_of_reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363909,
      "name": "BankTrack+4.1 Remediation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_1_Remediation.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "4.1 Remediation",
      "question": "Does the bank provide for, or cooperate in, the remediation of adverse impacts to which it identifies it has caused or contributed?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.<br>\n<br>\nWhy this metric is important: Banks, like any other business, can either cause, contribute to, or be directly linked to adverse human rights impacts, and it has been well-established that banks can contribute to adverse impacts through their provision of finance.38 A bank can identify its relationship to an impact, actual or potential, through human rights due diligence. If a bank identifies that it has caused or contributed to an adverse impact, it has a responsibility to actively participate in its remediation. To fulfil their human rights responsibilities, banks must be committed to remediation and have the necessary processes in place to remedy impacts they have caused or contrib- uted to when these are identified.",
      "methodology": "Requirements for full and half score:<br>\n<br>\nFull score: The bank makes a clear commitment to providing for or cooperating in the remediation of human rights impacts to which it has caused or contributed, and details a process for remediating such impacts.<br>\n<br>\nHalf score: The bank makes a clear commitment to providing for or cooperating in the remediation of human rights impacts to which it has caused or contributed, but without detailing a process for their remediation.<br>\n<br>\nFull methodology can be found in the [[https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds|report]].",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "BankTrack+4.1 Remediation+BankTrack Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_1_Remediation+BankTrack_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_1_Remediation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363921,
      "name": "BankTrack+4.2Evidence of remedy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_2Evidence_of_remedy.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "4.2Evidence of remedy",
      "question": "Does the bank show how it has provided for, or cooperated in, the remediation of adverse impacts to which it identifies it has caused or contributed?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.<br>\n<br>\nWhy this metric is important: The UN Guiding Principles implement the UN’s “protect, respect and remedy” framework, and are grounded in the need for rights and obligations to be matched to appropriate and effective remedies when breached. Yet so far, precious few examples have been seen of banks delivering, or supporting the delivery of, remedy to rights-holders. By reporting on instances in which they have either provided remedy directly (a responsibility in circumstances where the bank has contributed to the impact), or supported, cooperated in or enabled remedy (for example, together with a client or investee company, where the bank is directly linked to an impact), banks can show that their human rights due diligence is leading to positive impacts for rights-holders on the ground.",
      "methodology": "Requirements for full and half score:<br>\n<br>\nFull score: The bank is able to show a track record of providing remedy, or used its leverage to support remedy, in specific instances and provides sufficient detail (e.g. form of remedy achieved).<br>\n<br>\nHalf score: The bank describes one example of how it has provided remedy, or used its leverage to support remedy, for adverse human rights impacts <strong>OR</strong> the examples of remedy it provides are not sufficiently detailed (e.g. outcome or role of bank unclear).<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> Examples of provision of remedy from the last five years will be considered for scoring.</em><br>\n<br>\nFull methodology can be found in the [[https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds|report]].",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "BankTrack+4.2Evidence of remedy+BankTrack Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_2Evidence_of_remedy+BankTrack_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_2Evidence_of_remedy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363933,
      "name": "BankTrack+4.3 Grievance mechanism",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_3_Grievance_mechanism.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "4.3 Grievance mechanism",
      "question": "Has the bank established or participated in a grievance mechanism for individuals and communities who may be adversely impacted by its activities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.<br>\n<br>\nWhy this metric is important: Banks not only have a responsibility to remediate human rights impacts that they identify as having caused or contributed to, but also to ensure that those who feel their rights have been impacted are able to raise grievances and seek remedy. This is relevant both to situations where banks have caused or contributed to harm themselves, and where banks are directly linked to an impact through their business relationships. Banks can establish their own company-level grievance mechanism, or opt to join third-party mechanisms, for example, sector-level grievance mechanisms for other sectors, or with other banking industry peers.",
      "methodology": "Requirements for full and half score:<br>\n<br>\nFull score: The bank operates or participates in a grievance mechanism through which complaints or grievances can be raised to the bank, which is supported by a clear process for handling complaints; is explicitly able to address human rights related issues; and which is open to all who may be adversely impacted by its operations, products and services.<br>\n<br>\nHalf score: The bank operates or participates in a grievance mechanism through which complaints or grievances can be raised to the bank, but it is restricted to certain sectors or business areas, or is not supported by a clear process for handling complaints. Complaints mechanisms for employees are not scored in this benchmark.<br>\n<br>\nFull methodology can be found in the [[https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds|report]].",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "BankTrack+4.3 Grievance mechanism+BankTrack Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_3_Grievance_mechanism+BankTrack_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_3_Grievance_mechanism+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363945,
      "name": "BankTrack+4.4 Effectiveness",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_4_Effectiveness.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "4.4 Effectiveness",
      "question": "Does the bankʼs grievance mechanism meet effectiveness criteria?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.<br>\n<br>\nWhy this metric is important: The UN Guiding Principles outline a set of eight effectiveness criteria to ensure that non-judicial grievance mechanisms, whether State-based or non-State-based, are effective in serving the rights-holders they are intended for. These criteria require that grievance mechanisms are legitimate, accessible, predictable, equitable, transparent, and rights-compatible, among other requirements. Banks should use the effectiveness criteria as a guiding framework when designing, assessing and revising their own grievance mechanisms, or the mechanisms they participate in, to ensure they meet their purpose.",
      "methodology": "Requirements for full and half score:<br>\n<br>\nFull score: the bank shows how the grievance mechanism that it has established (or in which it participates) meets all of the UNGPs effectiveness criteria found in Guiding Principle 31, for example by conducting and reporting on assessment against these criteria, whether itself or via a third party.<br>\n<br>\nHalf score: the bank shows how the grievance mechanism that it has established (or in which it participates) meets at least two aspects of the UNGPs effectiveness criteria.<br>\n<br>\nFull methodology can be found in the [[https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds|report]].",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "BankTrack+4.4 Effectiveness+BankTrack Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_4_Effectiveness+BankTrack_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_4_Effectiveness+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363957,
      "name": "BankTrack+5.1: Human Rights Defenders (HRDs)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+5_1_Human_Rights_Defenders_HRDs.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "5.1: Human Rights Defenders (HRDs)",
      "question": "Does the bank publicly commit not to tolerate attacks on human rights defenders in connection with its operations or business relationships, and integrate HRD-specific considerations into its human rights due diligence processes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.<br>\n<br>\nWhy this metric is important: Human rights defenders are a particularly vulnerable group of rights-holders. As they challenge powerful actors and advocate for human and environmental rights, they often work in high-risk environments, where they are increasingly targets for harassment, threats, violence, and other forms of repression. Their specific rights are enshrined in the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders. The UN Guiding Principles also acknowledge the importance of human rights defenders in the context of corporate harms. Banks can impact on the specific rights of human rights defenders by financing or supporting companies or projects that pose a threat to them because of the nature of their advocacy. In 2021, the UN published interpretative guidance emphasising that business, including banks, must do more to safeguard the specific rights of human rights defenders, both through policy and in practice.",
      "methodology": "Requirements for full and half score:<br>\n<br>\nFull score: The bank commits not to tolerate attacks on HRDs, in connection to its own operations or its business relationships, in a statement of policy <strong>AND</strong> integrates HRD-specific considerations into human rights due diligence processes to identify and mitigate risks (including meaningful and safe stakeholder engagement).<br>\n<br>\nHalf score: The bank includes considerations on HRDs in a statement of policy, or as part of its human rights due diligence processes.<br>\n<br>\nFull methodology can be found in the [[https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds|report]].",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "BankTrack+5.1: Human Rights Defenders (HRDs)+BankTrack Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+5_1_Human_Rights_Defenders_HRDs+BankTrack_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+5_1_Human_Rights_Defenders_HRDs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363969,
      "name": "BankTrack+5.2: Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+5_2_Free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "5.2: Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)",
      "question": "Does the bank’s policy commitments reference the right to Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), and require clients and investee companies to provide evidence of FPIC wherever applicable?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.<br>\n<br>\nWhy this metric is important: Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) is a fundamental and inalienable right of Indigenous Peoples, protecting their collective rights, cultural identity and self-determination. The right of Indigenous Peoples to provide or withhold FPIC is protected by international human rights law, and is elaborated in global authoritative instruments such as the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). Without a clear commitment to respect FPIC, banks run the risk of financing activities – especially in high-risk sectors such as mining or energy – that endanger Indigenous People’s rights and livelihoods. Banks should embed FPIC considerations in policies and processes, and expect their business relationships to do the same, to fulfil their responsibility to protect human rights as outlined in the UN Guiding Principles.",
      "methodology": "Requirements for full and half score:<br>\n<br>\nFull score: The bankʼs policy commitment includes reference to the right to Free, Prior and Informed Consent, and requires that clients and investee companies, regardless of sector, provide evidence of FPIC to the bank wherever it is applicable.<br>\n<br>\nHalf score: The bankʼs policy commitment includes reference to the right to Free, Prior and Informed Consent.<br>\n<br>\nFull methodology can be found in the [[https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds|report]].",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "BankTrack+5.2: Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)+BankTrack Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+5_2_Free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC+BankTrack_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+5_2_Free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22363981,
      "name": "BankTrack+5.3: Environmental rights as human rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+5_3_Environmental_rights_as_human_rights.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "5.3: Environmental rights as human rights",
      "question": "Does the bank’s policy commitments recognise environmental rights as human rights, and does its due diligence process identify, prevent, and mitigate risks of environmental impacts on human rights?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.<br>\n<br>\nWhy this metric is important: In 2022, the UN General Assembly adopted a landmark resolution recognising the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment. Environmental degradation – such as deforestation, pollution, and climate change – can have severe and direct impacts on the enjoyment of basic human rights, including the rights to life, health, and food. The UN resolution calls on business enterprises, among other stakeholders, to adopt policies and scale up efforts to ensure environmental rights are enjoyed by all. Therefore, businesses, including banks, must acknowledge and respect environmental rights as human rights, and seek to identify, prevent and mitigate risks of environmental impacts on people.",
      "methodology": "Requirements for full and half score:<br>\n<br>\nFull score: The bankʼs policy commitment includes a recognition of environmental rights as human rights; for example, with reference to the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment (as recognised in 2022 by the UN General Assembly) <strong>AND</strong> its due diligence process identifies, prevents and mitigates risks of environmental impacts on human rights.<br>\n<br>\nHalf score: The bankʼs policy commitment includes a recognition of environmental rights as human rights; for example, with reference to the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment (as recognised in 2022 by the UN General Assembly).<br>\n<br>\nFull methodology can be found in the [[https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds|report]].",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "Partially",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "BankTrack+5.3: Environmental rights as human rights+BankTrack Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+5_3_Environmental_rights_as_human_rights+BankTrack_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+5_3_Environmental_rights_as_human_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22420463,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Readability of Report Formats",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Readability_of_Report_Formats.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Readability of Report Formats",
      "question": "What is the highest readability level of the formats in which the company publishes its non-financial report?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Inline machine-readable structured data",
        "Structured reporting format",
        "Combined static formats",
        "Structured tabular format",
        "Text-based static format",
        "Image-based static format",
        "No disclosure"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "Wikirate International e.V.+Readability of Report Formats+Wikirate Research Team"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var getAccessibilityCategory;\n\n  getAccessibilityCategory = function(report_formats) {\n    var f, formats, has, hasAny, hasDoc, i, len, onlyOne;\n    formats = (report_formats != null ? report_formats : []).map(function(s) {\n      return (\"\" + s).trim().toLowerCase();\n    });\n    has = {\n      pdfImage: false,\n      pdfText: false,\n      webHtml: false,\n      sheet: false,\n      xbrlStandalone: false,\n      xbrlInline: false,\n      noReport: false\n    };\n    for (i = 0, len = formats.length; i < len; i++) {\n      f = formats[i];\n      if (/no report available/.test(f)) {\n        has.noReport = true;\n      } else if (/pdf.*image/.test(f)) {\n        has.pdfImage = true;\n      } else if (/^pdf|pdf.*text|text.*pdf/.test(f)) {\n        has.pdfText = true;\n      } else if (/web.*html|^html$|^xhtml$/.test(f)) {\n        has.webHtml = true;\n      } else if (/spreadsheet|excel|xlsx|csv/.test(f)) {\n        has.sheet = true;\n      } else if (/(inline|ixbrl).*xbrl|^ixbrl$|inline xbrl|xhtml.*xbrl/.test(f)) {\n        has.xbrlInline = true;\n      } else if (/standalone.*xbrl|^xbrl$/.test(f && !/(inline|ixbrl)/.test(f))) {\n        has.xbrlStandalone = true;\n      }\n    }\n    hasDoc = has.pdfText || has.webHtml;\n    hasAny = has.pdfImage || has.pdfText || has.webHtml || has.sheet || has.xbrlStandalone || has.xbrlInline;\n    onlyOne = Object.values(has).filter(function(v) {\n      return v;\n    }).length === 1;\n    if (has.xbrlInline) {\n      return \"Inline machine-readable structured data\";\n    }\n    if (has.xbrlStandalone && hasDoc) {\n      return \"Structured reporting format\";\n    }\n    if ((has.pdfText && has.webHtml) || (hasDoc && has.sheet)) {\n      return \"Combined static formats\";\n    }\n    if (has.sheet) {\n      return \"Structured tabular format\";\n    }\n    if (hasDoc) {\n      return \"Text-based static format\";\n    }\n    if (has.pdfImage && onlyOne) {\n      return \"Image-based static format\";\n    }\n    if ((has.noReport && onlyOne) || !hasAny) {\n      return \"No disclosure\";\n    }\n  };\n\n  getAccessibilityCategory(report_formats);\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~21456528",
          "name": "report_formats"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 89,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 88,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Readability_of_Report_Formats+Wikirate_Research_Team.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Readability_of_Report_Formats+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22420473,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Readability of Report Formats+Wikirate Research Team",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Readability_of_Report_Formats+Wikirate_Research_Team.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Readability of Report Formats",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Reporting Integrity Index?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Inline machine-readable structured data\":\"10\",\"Structured reporting format\":\"8\",\"Combined static formats\":\"6\",\"Structured tabular format\":\"5\",\"Text-based static format\":\"4\",\"Image-based static format\":\"1\",\"No disclosure\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 89,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 88,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_Integrity_Index_2025.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Readability_of_Report_Formats+Wikirate_Research_Team+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22420480,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Integrated indicator codes+Wikirate Research Team",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Integrated_indicator_codes+Wikirate_Research_Team.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Integrated indicator codes",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for this indicator in the Reporting Integrity Index?",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Alongside disclosures (in line or on the same page)\":\"10\",\"Index with page references\":\"5\",\"Other\":\"\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 88,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 88,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_Integrity_Index_2025.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Integrated_indicator_codes+Wikirate_Research_Team+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22422755,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+Reporting Integrity Index 2025",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_Integrity_Index_2025.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "Reporting Integrity Index 2025",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve on the Reporting Integrity Index 2025?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Wikirate exists to cultivate open company data, but open alone is not enough. The data needs to be understandable, actionable and placed in the hands of decision-makers, who can then push for the changes people and the planet need.</p>\r\n<p>Benchmarks are an essential tool for making company data understandable and actionable. They not only tap into corporate competitiveness by shining a light on how companies perform comparatively but also provide an opportunity to set the bar and communicate good practices. </p>\r\n<p>Wikirate has therefore translated its mission into metrics and developed the Reporting Integrity Index that outlines what corporate disclosures should entail to ensure ESG data is open and reliable.</p>\r\n<p> </p>\r\n<p>The 2025 Index assesses data presentation practices among 50 of Germany’s largest companies in their non-financial reporting. For more details, analysis, and good practice guidance go to: <a href=\"https://wikirate-intl.org/Reporting_Integrity_Index_2025\">https://wikirate-intl.org/Reporting_Integrity_Index_2025</a> or download the [[https://wikirate-intl-production-storage.fra1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/files/8781/59039.pdf |full report]].</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Integrated Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22335077",
          "weight": 8.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22335083",
          "weight": 8.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22335089",
          "weight": 8.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22335095",
          "weight": 8.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22335107",
          "weight": 8.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22335113",
          "weight": 8.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22335119",
          "weight": 8.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22335125",
          "weight": 8.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22335131",
          "weight": 8.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22420480",
          "weight": 8.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22335101",
          "weight": 8.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22420473",
          "weight": 8.33
        }
      ],
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 1,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+Reporting_Integrity_Index_2025+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22432209,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+CPA-Zicklin Index: Political Disclosure and Accountability Benchmark",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+CPA_Zicklin_Index_Political_Disclosure_and_Accountability_Benchmark.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "CPA-Zicklin Index: Political Disclosure and Accountability Benchmark",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve in the CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">The </span><a href=\"https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"font-size: 16px;\">CPA-Zicklin Index</a><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> is a leading benchmark that evaluates how publicly traded companies in the United States disclose and manage their political spending. Developed by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA) in collaboration with the Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, the Index provides investors, stakeholders, and the public with a clear view of corporate transparency and accountability in political engagement.</span><br style=\"font-size: 16px;\"><br style=\"font-size: 16px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">The Index assesses companies across multiple dimensions, including whether they disclose direct and indirect political contributions, how they oversee such spending at the board and executive levels, and the extent to which they publicly communicate policies governing political activity. By tracking trends over time, the </span><a href=\"https://www.politicalaccountability.net/cpa-zicklin-index/\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"font-size: 16px;\">CPA-Zicklin Index</a><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> highlights best practices, identifies risks, and encourages companies to adopt greater openness in their political expenditures.</span></p>\r\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">[[https://www.politicalaccountability.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/2025-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf|Read the latest report here.]]</span></strong></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  ({\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Disclosure of corporate political contributions+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 5.71,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Payments to 527 groups +Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 5.71,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Independent political expenditures+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 5.71,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Payments to trade associations for political purposes+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 8.57,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Payments to tax-exempt organizations for political purposes+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 8.57,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Amounts paid to trade associations and tax-exempt organizations+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 2.86,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Payments to influence ballot measures+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 5.71,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Senior managers with authority over political spending+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 2.86,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Archived political expenditure reports+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 5.71,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Political expenditure policy from corporate funds+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 8.57,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Policy permitting only employee-funded PAC contributions+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 0.00,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Company interests over executives’ preferences policy+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 2.86,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Entities considered proper recipients of political spending+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 2.86,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Public policy positions guiding corporate political spending+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 2.86,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Senior management oversight of political spending policy+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 2.86,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Board oversight of corporate political activity policy+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 2.86,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Board committee reviewing political expenditure policy+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 2.86,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Board committee reviewing political expenditures from corporate funds+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 2.86,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Board committee reviewing payments+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 2.86,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Board committee approving political expenditures+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 2.86,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Board committee outside directors overseeing political activity+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 2.86,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Semiannual report of political spending on website+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 5.71,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Accessibility of political disclosure page+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 2.86,\n    \"Center for Political Accountability+Internal process or statement of compliance with political spending policy+Center for Political Accountability Research Group\": 2.86\n  });\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22586291",
          "weight": 51.43
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22580661",
          "weight": 22.86
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22587448",
          "weight": 25.71
        }
      ],
      "answer": 6429,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+CPA_Zicklin_Index_Political_Disclosure_and_Accountability_Benchmark+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22450916,
      "name": "BankTrack+1.1 Policy+BankTrack Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+1_1_Policy+BankTrack_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "1.1 Policy",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Policy_Commitment.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+1_1_Policy+BankTrack_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22450924,
      "name": "BankTrack+1.2 Policy approval+BankTrack Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+1_2_Policy_approval+BankTrack_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "1.2 Policy approval",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Policy_Commitment.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+1_2_Policy_approval+BankTrack_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22450932,
      "name": "BankTrack+1.3 Scope of policy+BankTrack Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+1_3_Scope_of_policy+BankTrack_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "1.3 Scope of policy",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Policy_Commitment.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+1_3_Scope_of_policy+BankTrack_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22450938,
      "name": "BankTrack+2.1 Due diligence+BankTrack Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_1_Due_diligence+BankTrack_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "2.1 Due diligence",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Due_Diligence_Process.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_1_Due_diligence+BankTrack_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22450944,
      "name": "BankTrack+2.2 Consultation+BankTrack Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_2_Consultation+BankTrack_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "2.2 Consultation",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Due_Diligence_Process.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_2_Consultation+BankTrack_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22450950,
      "name": "BankTrack+2.3 Allocating responsibility+BankTrack Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_3_Allocating_responsibility+BankTrack_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "2.3 Allocating responsibility",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Due_Diligence_Process.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_3_Allocating_responsibility+BankTrack_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22450956,
      "name": "BankTrack+2.4 Assessing relationship to impact+BankTrack Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_4_Assessing_relationship_to_impact+BankTrack_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "2.4 Assessing relationship to impact",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Due_Diligence_Process.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_4_Assessing_relationship_to_impact+BankTrack_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22450962,
      "name": "BankTrack+2.5 tracking effectiveness+BankTrack Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_5_tracking_effectiveness+BankTrack_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "2.5 tracking effectiveness",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Due_Diligence_Process.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+2_5_tracking_effectiveness+BankTrack_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22450968,
      "name": "BankTrack+3.1 Reporting+BankTrack Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+3_1_Reporting+BankTrack_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "3.1 Reporting",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Human_Rights_Reporting.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+3_1_Reporting+BankTrack_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22450974,
      "name": "BankTrack+3.2 Adequacy of response+BankTrack Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+3_2_Adequacy_of_response+BankTrack_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "3.2 Adequacy of response",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Human_Rights_Reporting.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+3_2_Adequacy_of_response+BankTrack_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22450980,
      "name": "BankTrack+3.3 Quality of reporting+BankTrack Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+3_3_Quality_of_reporting+BankTrack_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "3.3 Quality of reporting",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Human_Rights_Reporting.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+3_3_Quality_of_reporting+BankTrack_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22450986,
      "name": "BankTrack+4.4 Effectiveness+BankTrack Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_4_Effectiveness+BankTrack_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "4.4 Effectiveness",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Remedy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_4_Effectiveness+BankTrack_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22450992,
      "name": "BankTrack+4.3 Grievance mechanism+BankTrack Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_3_Grievance_mechanism+BankTrack_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "4.3 Grievance mechanism",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Remedy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_3_Grievance_mechanism+BankTrack_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22450998,
      "name": "BankTrack+4.2Evidence of remedy+BankTrack Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_2Evidence_of_remedy+BankTrack_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "4.2Evidence of remedy",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Remedy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_2Evidence_of_remedy+BankTrack_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22451004,
      "name": "BankTrack+4.1 Remediation+BankTrack Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_1_Remediation+BankTrack_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "4.1 Remediation",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Remedy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+4_1_Remediation+BankTrack_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22451010,
      "name": "BankTrack+5.1: Human Rights Defenders (HRDs)+BankTrack Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+5_1_Human_Rights_Defenders_HRDs+BankTrack_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "5.1: Human Rights Defenders (HRDs)",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Specific_Rights_Indicators_non_core.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+5_1_Human_Rights_Defenders_HRDs+BankTrack_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22451016,
      "name": "BankTrack+5.2: Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)+BankTrack Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+5_2_Free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC+BankTrack_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "5.2: Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Specific_Rights_Indicators_non_core.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+5_2_Free_prior_and_informed_consent_FPIC+BankTrack_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22451022,
      "name": "BankTrack+5.3: Environmental rights as human rights+BankTrack Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+5_3_Environmental_rights_as_human_rights+BankTrack_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "5.3: Environmental rights as human rights",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"Partially\":\"5\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Specific_Rights_Indicators_non_core.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+5_3_Environmental_rights_as_human_rights+BankTrack_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22451052,
      "name": "BankTrack+Policy Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Policy_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "Policy Commitment",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for its human rights policy commitment under the BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>A clear policy commitment is the foundation for effective human rights due diligence. It demonstrates that the company acknowledges its responsibility to respect human rights and sets expectations for its operations and business relationships.</p>\r\n<p>This metric forms part of the BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark under Category 1: Policy Commitment, which evaluates financial institutions on their human rights policies and practices.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22450916",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22450924",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22450932",
          "weight": 33.33
        }
      ],
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Global_Human_Rights_Benchmark.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Policy_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22451066,
      "name": "BankTrack+Due Diligence Process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Due_Diligence_Process.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "Due Diligence Process",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for its human rights due diligence process under the BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Human rights due diligence is a central expectation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). It involves assessing potential and actual impacts, taking action to prevent or mitigate harm, tracking the effectiveness of responses, and communicating how impacts are addressed.</p>\r\n<p>This metric forms part of the BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark under Category 2: Due Diligence Process, which evaluates how companies embed respect for human rights through systematic risk identification and management.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22450938",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22450944",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22450950",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22450956",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22450962",
          "weight": 20
        }
      ],
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Global_Human_Rights_Benchmark.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Due_Diligence_Process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22451200,
      "name": "BankTrack+Human Rights Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Human_Rights_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "Human Rights Reporting",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for its human rights reporting under the BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Transparent reporting is a key expectation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). It enables stakeholders to evaluate how effectively a company identifies, prevents, and addresses human rights risks, and demonstrates progress over time.</p>\r\n<p>This metric forms part of the BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark under Category 3: Reporting, which evaluates how companies communicate their human rights practices and performance to the public.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22450968",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22450974",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22450980",
          "weight": 33.33
        }
      ],
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Global_Human_Rights_Benchmark.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Human_Rights_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22451208,
      "name": "BankTrack+Remedy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Remedy.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "Remedy",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for remedy and grievance mechanisms under the BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Access to remedy is a central expectation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). Companies are expected to enable affected individuals or communities to raise concerns, seek solutions, and have harms addressed in a fair and timely manner.</p>\r\n<p>This metric forms part of the BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark under Category 4: Remedy and Grievance Mechanisms, which evaluates how companies ensure accountability and provide avenues for remedy when human rights are adversely impacted.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22451004",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22450998",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22450992",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22450986",
          "weight": 25
        }
      ],
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Global_Human_Rights_Benchmark.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Remedy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22451216,
      "name": "BankTrack+Specific Rights Indicators (non-core)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Specific_Rights_Indicators_non_core.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "Specific Rights Indicators (non-core)",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve for specific human rights indicators under the BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This metric assesses whether the company discloses performance on targeted human rights issues that are especially relevant to its operations and relationships.</p>\r\n<p>It focuses on areas where companies face heightened responsibilities, such as respecting and protecting human rights defenders, ensuring meaningful consultation and consent with affected communities, and recognizing environmental rights as integral to human rights. Reporting on these issues provides stakeholders with insight into how the company addresses critical and sensitive human rights risks in practice.</p>\r\n<p>This metric forms part of the BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark under Category 5: Specific Indicators, which evaluates how companies provide measurable, issue-specific information on their human rights performance in areas of heightened concern.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22451010",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22451016",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22451022",
          "weight": 33.33
        }
      ],
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Global_Human_Rights_Benchmark.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Specific_Rights_Indicators_non_core+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22451224,
      "name": "BankTrack+Global Human Rights Benchmark",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Global_Human_Rights_Benchmark.json",
      "designer": "BankTrack",
      "title": "Global Human Rights Benchmark",
      "question": "What score did the company achieve on the BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>The [[https://www.banktrack.org/hrbenchmark|BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark]] is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.</p>\r\n<p><strong>[[More information here. |https://www.banktrack.org/article/most_large_banks_still_failing_to_implement_un_human_rights_principles_new_banktrack_benchmark_finds#inform=1]]</strong></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22451052",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22451066",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22451200",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22451208",
          "weight": 26.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22451216",
          "weight": 0
        }
      ],
      "answer": 50,
      "bookmarkers": 1,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 50,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/BankTrack+Global_Human_Rights_Benchmark+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22455875,
      "name": "Wikirate International e.V.+CSRD Report Publication",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+CSRD_Report_Publication.json",
      "designer": "Wikirate International e.V.",
      "title": "CSRD Report Publication",
      "question": "Does the company publish a CSRD-aligned sustainability",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric tracks whether a company publishes a sustainability report aligned with the <strong>Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)</strong>. The CSRD is a European Union directive that standardizes and strengthens corporate sustainability reporting, requiring companies to disclose information on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters in line with the <strong>European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS)</strong>.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>By indicating \"Yes\", a company confirms that it has published a report aligned with CSRD requirements. A \"No\" response means that no such CSRD-aligned report was identified or published.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Sustainability Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 641,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 641,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Wikirate_International_e_V+CSRD_Report_Publication+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22580661,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Political Spending Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Policy.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Political Spending Policy",
      "question": "What is the company's Policy score under the CPA-Zicklin Index for Corporate Political Accountability?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This metric represents a company's overall Policy score as defined by the Center for Political Accountability Zicklin Index.</p>\r\n<p>It evaluates the strength, clarity, and governance quality of a company's publicly available policies governing political spending.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22348443",
          "weight": 37.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22348407",
          "weight": 0
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22348395",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22346551",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22348383",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22348461",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22348377",
          "weight": 12.5
        }
      ],
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+CPA_Zicklin_Index_Political_Disclosure_and_Accountability_Benchmark.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22586291,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Political Spending Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Political Spending Disclosure",
      "question": "What is the company's Disclosure score under the CPA-Zicklin Index for Corporate Political Accountability?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This metric represents a company's overall Disclosure score as defined by the Center for Political Accountability Zicklin Index.</p>\r\n<p>It measures the transparency and accessibility of a company's reporting on its political spending and related activities.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22348389",
          "weight": 11.11111111
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22348413",
          "weight": 11.11111111
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22348425",
          "weight": 11.11111111
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22348419",
          "weight": 16.66666667
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22348431",
          "weight": 16.66666667
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22348437",
          "weight": 5.555555556
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22348455",
          "weight": 11.11111111
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22348449",
          "weight": 5.555555556
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22348401",
          "weight": 11.11111111
        }
      ],
      "answer": 6429,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+CPA_Zicklin_Index_Political_Disclosure_and_Accountability_Benchmark.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22587448,
      "name": "Center for Political Accountability+Political Spending Oversight",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Oversight.json",
      "designer": "Center for Political Accountability",
      "title": "Political Spending Oversight",
      "question": "What is the company's Oversight score under the CPA-Zicklin Index for Corporate Political Accountability?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>This metric represents a company's overall Overight score as defined by the Center for Political Accountability Zicklin Index.</p>\r\n<p>It evaluates the governance structures and board-level oversight that ensure a company's political spending aligns with its stated policies, values, and risk management practices.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22348371",
          "weight": 11.11111111
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22348365",
          "weight": 11.11111111
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22348359",
          "weight": 11.11111111
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22348353",
          "weight": 11.11111111
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22348075",
          "weight": 11.11111111
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22347909",
          "weight": 22.22222222
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22347655",
          "weight": 11.11111111
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22347293",
          "weight": 11.11111111
        }
      ],
      "answer": 6431,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1170,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+CPA_Zicklin_Index_Political_Disclosure_and_Accountability_Benchmark.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Center_for_Political_Accountability+Political_Spending_Oversight+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22972497,
      "name": "Sustainable Apparel Coalition (SAC)+Cascale Membership",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainable_Apparel_Coalition_SAC+Cascale_Membership.json",
      "designer": "Sustainable Apparel Coalition (SAC)",
      "title": "Cascale Membership",
      "question": "Is the company a Cascale Member, and if so, what is its membership status?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>Cascale (formerly the Sustainable Apparel Coalition) is a global organization that convenes companies and other stakeholders in the apparel, footwear, and textile sectors. It develops shared tools and frameworks, such as the Higg Index, for assessing environmental and social impacts across supply chains.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The list of Cascale members can be found on the membership page: https://cascale.org/our-members/</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Corporate Full Member",
        "Corporate Candidate Member",
        "Affiliate Member"
      ],
      "report_type": "Member List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 146,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 146,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Sustainable_Apparel_Coalition_SAC+Cascale_Membership+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22973169,
      "name": "International Accord+International Accord Signatory",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/International_Accord+International_Accord_Signatory.json",
      "designer": "International Accord",
      "title": "International Accord Signatory",
      "question": "Is the organization a signatory to the International Accord for Health and Safety in the Garment and Textile Industry?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The International Accord is a legally binding agreement between global brands and trade unions to improve health and safety in garment factories. It grew out of the Bangladesh Accord, which was established after the 2013 Rana Plaza disaster to address factory safety through independent inspections and enforceable commitments. The International Accord expands this model to multiple countries through national programs and oversight mechanisms.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The list of signatories can be accessed on the International Accord website: <a href=\"https://internationalaccord.org/signatories/?_signatory_categories=international-accord\">https://internationalaccord.org/signatories/?_signatory_categories=international-accord</a></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Please note</span>: The International Accord, the Bangladesh Accord, and the Pakistan Accord are separate, legally distinct agreements that operate under the same overarching framework and shared principles. Make sure you are using the company signatory list <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">for the International Accord only</span>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Signatory List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Health & Safety",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Occupational Health & Safety"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 270,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 270,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/International_Accord+International_Accord_Signatory+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22973182,
      "name": "International Accord+Pakistan Accord Signatory",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/International_Accord+Pakistan_Accord_Signatory.json",
      "designer": "International Accord",
      "title": "Pakistan Accord Signatory",
      "question": "Is the organization a signatory to the Pakistan Accord on Health and Safety in the Textile and Garment Industry?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>The Pakistan Accord is a legally binding agreement between global brands and trade unions to improve health and safety in garment factories in Pakistan. It builds on the model of the Bangladesh Accord and the International Accord, using independent inspections, required remediation, and worker protections. The Accord establishes a national program with shared oversight by brands and unions.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The list of signatories can be accessed on the International Accord website: <a href=\"https://internationalaccord.org/signatories/?_signatory_categories=pakistan\">https://internationalaccord.org/signatories/?_signatory_categories=pakistan</a></p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Please note</span>: The International Accord, the Bangladesh Accord, and the Pakistan Accord are separate, legally distinct agreements that operate under the same overarching framework and shared principles. Make sure you are using the company signatory list <span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">for the Pakistan Accord only</span>.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Signatory List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 139,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 139,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/International_Accord+Pakistan_Accord_Signatory+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22976023,
      "name": "IndustriALL Global Union+IndustriALL Global Framework Agreement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/IndustriALL_Global_Union+IndustriALL_Global_Framework_Agreement.json",
      "designer": "IndustriALL Global Union",
      "title": "IndustriALL Global Framework Agreement",
      "question": "Is there an active Global Framework Agreement between IndustriALL Global Union and the company?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric tracks whether a company has an active Global Framework Agreement (GFA) with IndustriALL Global Union. GFAs are negotiated agreements between multinational companies and trade unions that aim to uphold workers’ rights, such as freedom of association and safe working conditions, across the company’s global operations or supply chain. An active agreement indicates that the company is formally engaged with IndustriALL to maintain these standards.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>The list of Global Framework Agreements can be found on IndustriALL's website: <a href=\"https://www.industriall-union.org/global-framework-agreements\">https://www.industriall-union.org/global-framework-agreements</a></p>\r\n<p>Please cite the website as well as a link to the GFA for the year you are researching. </p>\r\n<p><em>Note: The agreements are sometimes renewed with updated terms so <strong>make sure you have selected the correct year</strong>. </em></p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Signatory List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 93,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 8,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/IndustriALL_Global_Union+IndustriALL_Global_Framework_Agreement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22991942,
      "name": "Fairwork+Precarity & overwork+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Precarity_overwork+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Precarity & overwork",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_2_Fair_Conditions_Cloudwork.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Precarity_overwork+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22992595,
      "name": "Fairwork+Data management & appeals+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Data_management_appeals+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Data management & appeals",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_4_Fair_Management_AI.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Data_management_appeals+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22992711,
      "name": "Fairwork+Fair treatment+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fair_treatment+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Fair treatment",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_4_Fair_Management_AI.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fair_treatment+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22993196,
      "name": "Fairwork+Secure employment+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Secure_employment+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Secure employment",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_3_Fair_Contracts_AI.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Secure_employment+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22993362,
      "name": "Fairwork+Decent contracts+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Decent_contracts+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Decent contracts",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_3_Fair_Contracts_AI.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Decent_contracts+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22993500,
      "name": "Fairwork+Paid leave & safety net+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Paid_leave_safety_net+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Paid leave & safety net",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_2_Fair_Conditions_AI.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Paid_leave_safety_net+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22993603,
      "name": "Fairwork+Working conditions+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Working_conditions+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Working conditions",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_2_Fair_Conditions_AI.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Working_conditions+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22993837,
      "name": "Fairwork+Collective Bargaining+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Collective_Bargaining+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Collective Bargaining",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_5_Fair_Representation_Cloudwork.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Collective_Bargaining+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22994022,
      "name": "Fairwork+Worker representation & association+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Worker_representation_association+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Worker representation & association",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_5_Fair_Representation_Cloudwork.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Worker_representation_association+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22994144,
      "name": "Fairwork+Contract consistency+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Contract_consistency+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Contract consistency",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_3_Fair_Contracts_Cloudwork.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Contract_consistency+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22994286,
      "name": "Fairwork+Clear terms & condtions+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Clear_terms_condtions+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Clear terms & condtions",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_3_Fair_Contracts_Cloudwork.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Clear_terms_condtions+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22994408,
      "name": "Fairwork+Health & safety risk+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Health_safety_risk+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Health & safety risk",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_2_Fair_Conditions_Cloudwork.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Health_safety_risk+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22994566,
      "name": "Fairwork+Local minimun wage+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Local_minimun_wage+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Local minimun wage",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_1_Fair_Pay.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_1_Fair_Pay_Cloudwork.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Local_minimun_wage+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22994739,
      "name": "Fairwork+Payment reliability+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Payment_reliability+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Payment reliability",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_1_Fair_Pay_Cloudwork.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Payment_reliability+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22994882,
      "name": "Fairwork+Support for democratic governance+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Support_for_democratic_governance+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Support for democratic governance",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_5_Fair_Representation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Support_for_democratic_governance+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22994998,
      "name": "Fairwork+Freedom of association & worker voice+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Freedom_of_association_worker_voice+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Freedom of association & worker voice",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_5_Fair_Representation.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Freedom_of_association_worker_voice+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22995074,
      "name": "Fairwork+Equitable management practices+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Equitable_management_practices+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Equitable management practices",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_4_Fair_Management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Equitable_management_practices+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22995174,
      "name": "Fairwork+Due process in decisions+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Due_process_in_decisions+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Due process in decisions",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_4_Fair_Management.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Due_process_in_decisions+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22995271,
      "name": "Fairwork+No unfair contract terms+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+No_unfair_contract_terms+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "No unfair contract terms",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_3_Fair_Contracts_Location_Based.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+No_unfair_contract_terms+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22995403,
      "name": "Fairwork+Transparent terms & conditions+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Transparent_terms_conditions+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Transparent terms & conditions",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_3_Fair_Contracts_Location_Based.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Transparent_terms_conditions+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22995630,
      "name": "Fairwork+Safe condition & safety net+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Safe_condition_safety_net+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Safe condition & safety net",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_2_Fair_Conditions_Location_Based.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Safe_condition_safety_net+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22995726,
      "name": "Fairwork+Task specific risk mitigation+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Task_specific_risk_mitigation+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Task specific risk mitigation",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_2_Fair_Conditions_Location_Based.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Task_specific_risk_mitigation+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 22995853,
      "name": "Fairwork+Local living wage+Fairwork Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Local_living_wage+Fairwork_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Local living wage",
      "question": "What is the numerical score given to the company based on its response",
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_1_Fair_Pay.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Local_living_wage+Fairwork_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23003990,
      "name": "Fairwork+Principle 1: Fair Pay",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_1_Fair_Pay.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Principle 1: Fair Pay",
      "question": "How many points did the platform receive for Principle 1 (Fair Pay) in the Fairwork Rating?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Principle 1: Fair Pay evaluates whether workers on the platform earn at least the applicable local minimum wage after accounting for work-related costs.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22994566",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22995853",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Location_Based_Work_Rating.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_AI_Rating.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_1_Fair_Pay+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23004747,
      "name": "Fairwork+Principle 2: Fair Conditions (Location-Based)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_2_Fair_Conditions_Location_Based.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Principle 2: Fair Conditions (Location-Based)",
      "question": "How many points did the platform receive for Principle 2 (Fair Conditions) in the Fairwork Location-Based Rating for the specified year?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Principle 2: Fair Conditions assesses whether the platform takes adequate measures to protect workers from risks arising in the course of their work.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22995726",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22995630",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Location_Based_Work_Rating.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_2_Fair_Conditions_Location_Based+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23005395,
      "name": "Fairwork+Principle 3: Fair Contracts (Location-Based)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_3_Fair_Contracts_Location_Based.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Principle 3: Fair Contracts (Location-Based)",
      "question": "How many points did the platform receive for Principle 3 (Fair Contracts) in the Fairwork Location-Based Rating for the specified year?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Principle 3: Fair Contracts evaluates whether the platform’s terms and conditions are clear, transparent, and fair to workers.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22995403",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22995271",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Location_Based_Work_Rating.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_3_Fair_Contracts_Location_Based+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23006361,
      "name": "Fairwork+Principle 4: Fair Management",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_4_Fair_Management.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Principle 4: Fair Management",
      "question": "How many points did the platform receive for Principle 4 (Fair Management) in the Fairwork Rating for the specified year?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Principle 4: Fair Management evaluates whether the platform ensures equity in its management processes and protects workers from unfair treatment.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22995174",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22995074",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Location_Based_Work_Rating.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Cloudwork_Rating.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_4_Fair_Management+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23006984,
      "name": "Fairwork+Principle 5: Fair Representation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_5_Fair_Representation.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Principle 5: Fair Representation",
      "question": "How many points did the platform receive for Principle 5 (Fair Representation) in the Fairwork Rating for the specified year?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Principle 5: Fair Representation assesses whether the platform recognizes and supports workers’ rights to collective voice and representation.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22994998",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22994882",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Location_Based_Work_Rating.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_AI_Rating.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_5_Fair_Representation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23007669,
      "name": "Fairwork+Principle 1: Fair Pay (Cloudwork)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_1_Fair_Pay_Cloudwork.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Principle 1: Fair Pay (Cloudwork)",
      "question": "How many points did the platform receive for Principle 1 (Fair Pay) in the Fairwork Cloudwork Rating for the specified year?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Principle 1: Fair Pay evaluates whether workers on the online-based (cloudwork) platform earn at least the applicable local minimum wage for the time they spend working.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22994739",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22994566",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Cloudwork_Rating.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_1_Fair_Pay_Cloudwork+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23007693,
      "name": "Fairwork+Principle 2: Fair Conditions (Cloudwork)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_2_Fair_Conditions_Cloudwork.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Principle 2: Fair Conditions (Cloudwork)",
      "question": "Principle 2: Fair Conditions evaluates whether the platform identifies and mitigates risks arising from online-based work and takes steps to protect workers from harm.",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22991942",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22994408",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Cloudwork_Rating.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_2_Fair_Conditions_Cloudwork+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23007702,
      "name": "Fairwork+Principle 3: Fair Contracts (Cloudwork)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_3_Fair_Contracts_Cloudwork.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Principle 3: Fair Contracts (Cloudwork)",
      "question": "How many points did the platform receive for Principle 3 (Fair Contracts) in the Fairwork Cloudwork Rating for the specified year?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Principle 3: Fair Contracts evaluates whether the platform’s terms and conditions are transparent, accessible, and fair to workers engaged in online-based work.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22994286",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22994144",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Cloudwork_Rating.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_3_Fair_Contracts_Cloudwork+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23007712,
      "name": "Fairwork+Principle 5: Fair Representation (Cloudwork)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_5_Fair_Representation_Cloudwork.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Principle 5: Fair Representation (Cloudwork)",
      "question": "How many points did the platform receive for Principle 5 (Fair Representation) in the Fairwork Cloudwork Rating for the specified year?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Principle 5: Fair Representation assesses whether the platform respects and supports workers' rights to collective voice and representation in the context of online-based work.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22994022",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22993837",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Cloudwork_Rating.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_5_Fair_Representation_Cloudwork+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23007722,
      "name": "Fairwork+Principle 2: Fair Conditions (AI)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_2_Fair_Conditions_AI.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Principle 2: Fair Conditions (AI)",
      "question": "How many points did the platform receive for Principle 2 (Fair Conditions) in the Fairwork AI Rating for the specified year?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Principle 2: Fair Conditions evaluates whether the platform identifies, mitigates, and responds to risks arising from AI-related work and the broader AI data supply chain.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22993603",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22993500",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_AI_Rating.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_2_Fair_Conditions_AI+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23007732,
      "name": "Fairwork+Principle 3: Fair Contracts (AI)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_3_Fair_Contracts_AI.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Principle 3: Fair Contracts (AI)",
      "question": "How many points did the platform receive for Principle 3 (Fair Contracts) in the Fairwork AI Rating for the specified year?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Principle 3: Fair Contracts evaluates whether the platform's terms and conditions governing AI-related work are transparent, accessible, and fair to workers.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22993362",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22993196",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_AI_Rating.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_3_Fair_Contracts_AI+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23007742,
      "name": "Fairwork+Principle 4: Fair Management (AI)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_4_Fair_Management_AI.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Principle 4: Fair Management (AI)",
      "question": "How many points did the platform receive for Principle 4 (Fair Management) in the Fairwork AI Rating for the specified year?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p>Principle 4: Fair Management evaluates whether the platform ensures transparent, equitable, and accountable management processes in AI-related work, including the use of automated or algorithmic systems.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~22992711",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~22992595",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_AI_Rating.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Principle_4_Fair_Management_AI+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23007752,
      "name": "Fairwork+Fairwork Location-Based Work Rating",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Location_Based_Work_Rating.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Fairwork Location-Based Work Rating",
      "question": "What overall score did the platform receive in the Fairwork Location-Based Work Rating for the specified year?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 12pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">The location-based Fairwork Ratings assess how digital platform companies treat workers in specific countries or regions. Developed by </span><a href=\"https://fair.work/en/fw/homepage/\" style=\"text-decoration: none;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #1155cc; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: underline; -webkit-text-decoration-skip: none; text-decoration-skip-ink: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Fairwork</span></a><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">, these ratings recognise that working conditions, legal frameworks, and labour protections can vary significantly by location.</span></p>\r\n<p><span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 12pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Companies are evaluated against five principles: fair pay, fair conditions, fair contracts, fair management, and fair representation. A company can receive one point for each principle met in a given location, for a maximum score of five. Scores are determined using publicly available evidence, information provided by companies, and, where applicable, worker testimonies relevant to that location.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~23003990",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23004747",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23005395",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23006361",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23006984",
          "weight": 20
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Rating.json",
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Holding_Company_Average_Rating.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Location_Based_Work_Rating+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23007762,
      "name": "Fairwork+Fairwork Cloudwork Rating",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Cloudwork_Rating.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Fairwork Cloudwork Rating",
      "question": "What overall score did the platform receive in the Fairwork Cloudwork Rating for the specified year?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 12pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">The cloudwork Fairwork Ratings assess how digital labour platforms treat workers who perform tasks remotely via online systems. Developed by </span><a href=\"https://fair.work/en/fw/homepage/\" style=\"text-decoration: none;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #1155cc; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: underline; -webkit-text-decoration-skip: none; text-decoration-skip-ink: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Fairwork</span></a><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">, these ratings focus on labour practices in cloudwork, where work is location-independent but often shaped by global power imbalances and limited regulation.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 12pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 12pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Platforms are evaluated against five principles: fair pay, fair conditions, fair contracts, fair management, and fair representation. A platform can receive one point for each principle met, for a maximum score of five. Scores are based on publicly available evidence, information provided directly by platforms, and, where applicable, testimonies from cloudworkers.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~23007669",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23007693",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23007702",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23006361",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23007712",
          "weight": 20
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Rating.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Cloudwork_Rating+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23007772,
      "name": "Fairwork+Fairwork AI Rating",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_AI_Rating.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Fairwork AI Rating",
      "question": "What overall score did the platform receive in the Fairwork AI Rating for the specified year?",
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": "<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 12pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">The AI Fairwork Ratings assess how companies involved in artificial intelligence systems treat the workers who support their development, deployment, and maintenance. Developed by </span><a href=\"https://fair.work/en/fw/homepage/\" style=\"text-decoration: none;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #1155cc; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: underline; -webkit-text-decoration-skip: none; text-decoration-skip-ink: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Fairwork</span></a><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">, the ratings focus on labour practices affecting workers engaged in tasks such as data annotation, content moderation, model training, and system evaluation.</span></p>\r\n<p><span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 12pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Companies are assessed against five principles: fair pay, fair conditions, fair contracts, fair management, and fair representation. One point is awarded for each principle met, for a maximum score of five. Ratings are based on publicly available evidence, information provided by companies, and, where applicable, testimonies from workers involved in AI-related labour.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~23003990",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23007722",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23007732",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23007742",
          "weight": 20
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23006984",
          "weight": 20
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Rating.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_AI_Rating+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23007782,
      "name": "Fairwork+Fairwork Rating",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Rating.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Fairwork Rating",
      "question": "What is the platform’s overall Fairwork rating under the applicable methodology?",
      "metric_type": "Descendant",
      "about": "<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 12pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">The Fairwork Ratings assess how digital platform companies treat the people who work through them. Developed by </span><a href=\"https://fair.work/en/fw/homepage/\" style=\"text-decoration: none;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #1155cc; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: underline; -webkit-text-decoration-skip: none; text-decoration-skip-ink: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Fairwork</span></a><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">, the ratings provide an evidence-based evaluation of platform working conditions against a set of fair labour standards.</span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 12pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">Companies are scored on five principles: fair pay, fair conditions, fair contracts, fair management, and fair representation. For each principle met, a company receives one point, for a maximum score of five. Scores are based on publicly available evidence, information provided directly by companies, and, where applicable, testimonies from workers.</span></p>\r\n<p><span></span></p>\r\n<p style=\"line-height: 1.38; margin-top: 12pt; margin-bottom: 12pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;\">The Fairwork Ratings aim to improve transparency in the platform economy and support workers, consumers, investors, and policymakers in understanding and comparing labour practices across platforms.</span></p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~23007752"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23007762"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23007772"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Fairwork_Rating+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23008266,
      "name": "Fairwork+Operates platform",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Operates_platform.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Operates platform",
      "question": "Which country-specific digital platform(s) does this company operate?",
      "metric_type": "Relation",
      "about": "<p>This metric captures the relationship between a company and a digital labour platform that it operates.</p>\r\n<p>A company is considered to “operate” a platform if it owns, controls, manages, or is responsible for the platform’s business activities in a given country.</p>",
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Location-based",
        "Cloudwork",
        "AI"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Operates_platform+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23008277,
      "name": "Fairwork+Platform operated by",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Platform_operated_by.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Platform operated by",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Inverse Relation",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Platform_operated_by+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23065562,
      "name": "Fairwork+Holding Company Average Rating",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Holding_Company_Average_Rating.json",
      "designer": "Fairwork",
      "title": "Holding Company Average Rating",
      "question": "What is the average Fairwork score across all platforms operated by this company?",
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  scores.reduce((function(sum, n) {\n    return sum + n;\n  }), 0) / scores.length;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "company": "Fairwork+Operates_platform",
          "metric": "~23007752",
          "name": "scores"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fairwork+Holding_Company_Average_Rating+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23207629,
      "name": "ACT Action, Collaboration, Transformation+ACT Cambodia Signatory",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/ACT_Action_Collaboration_Transformation+ACT_Cambodia_Signatory.json",
      "designer": "ACT Action, Collaboration, Transformation",
      "title": "ACT Cambodia Signatory",
      "question": "Is the company a signatory to the ACT Cambodia binding agreement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Signatory List",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 26,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 13,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/ACT_Action_Collaboration_Transformation+ACT_Cambodia_Signatory+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23241954,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+CSRD Applicability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+CSRD_Applicability.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "CSRD Applicability",
      "question": "Is the company within the scope of the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric assesses whether a company falls within the scope of the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). The metric supports transparency by identifying which companies are legally required to disclose standardized ESG information under the CSRD. </p>\r\n<p>The EU CSRD has been revised through the EU Omnibus process which sets in place new thresholds for inclusion which will apply from FY2027. Please see the current and future scopes below: </p>\r\n<p><strong>Original CSRD scope (Directive (EU) 2022/2464, applicable 2024–2026):</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>EU companies meeting at least 2 of 3 thresholds: 250+ employees, €40m+ turnover, €20m+ assets</li>\r\n<li>EU-listed companies (excluding micro-enterprises)</li>\r\n<li>Non‑EU companies with EU activity generating over €150 million in turnover</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>Revised CSRD scope (post-Omnibus reforms, expected from FY 2027):</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>EU companies with more than 1,000 employees and net annual turnover exceeding €450 million</li>\r\n<li>Non-EU companies with EU activity generating over €450 million in turnover</li>\r\n<li>The revised scope significantly reduces the number of companies covered and is expected to apply from financial year 2027 onward (with reporting from 2028).</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Steps for researchers</strong>:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Company type and location</strong>: Check whether the company is EU-based or non-EU with EU operations.</li>\r\n<li><strong>Employee and financial thresholds</strong>:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Original scope (2024–2026): Large EU companies meet at least 2 of 3 thresholds — 250+ employees, €40 million+ turnover, €20 million+ assets.</li>\r\n<li>Revised scope (2027 onward): Companies with more than 1,000 employees and net EU turnover exceeding €450 million.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n<li><strong>Listing status</strong>: For the original scope, check if the company is listed on an EU regulated market; micro-enterprises are excluded. For the revised scope, listing alone does not trigger applicability.</li>\r\n<li><strong>Non-EU companies</strong>: Verify EU turnover and presence of qualifying subsidiaries or branches.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>Sources to consult:</strong></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>CSRD reports (this indicates they are in scope)</li>\r\n<li>Company annual reports and financial statements (for employees, turnover, and total assets)</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability / ESG reports (may indicate anticipated CSRD reporting)</li>\r\n<li>Regulated EU stock exchange listings (to check listing status and micro-enterprise exemption)</li>\r\n<li>National corporate registries (legal form, headquarters, subsidiaries, branches, sometimes employee counts)</li>\r\n<li>Company websites and investor relations pages (information on EU operations, subsidiaries, and branches)</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+CSRD_Applicability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23241976,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Norwegian Transparency Act Applicability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Norwegian_Transparency_Act_Applicability.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Norwegian Transparency Act Applicability",
      "question": "Is the company within the scope of the Norwegian Transparency Act?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric assesses whether a company falls within the scope of the Norwegian Transparency Act (Åpenhetsloven).</p>\r\n<p>The Norwegian Transparency Act  is a law that requires large companies operating in Norway to conduct due diligence to identify, prevent, and address adverse impacts on human rights and decent working conditions across their operations and supply chains. It also mandates public reporting and a right-to-information, meaning companies must disclose how they manage these risks and respond to information requests from the public.</p>\r\n<p>The Norwegian Transparency Act sets thresholds for inclusion based on company size and activity:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Norwegian companies meeting at least 2 of 3 thresholds:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>NOK 70 million+ annual revenue</li>\r\n<li>NOK 35 million+ total assets</li>\r\n<li>50+ full-time employees</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>Foreign companies offering goods or services in Norway, taxable in Norway, meeting the same size thresholds</li>\r\n<li>Subsidiaries are aggregated with parent companies for assessment</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p><strong>Steps for researchers</strong>:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Company type and location</strong>: Check whether the company is Norwegian or a non-Norwegian company with operations in Norway (i.e., offering goods or services and subject to Norwegian taxation).</li>\r\n<li><strong>Employee and financial thresholds</strong>:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Companies must meet at least 2 of 3 thresholds:</li>\r\n<li>NOK 70 million+ annual revenue</li>\r\n<li>NOK 35 million+ total assets</li>\r\n<li>50+ full-time employees</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n<li><strong>Group structure</strong>:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>For Norwegian parent companies, assess thresholds on a consolidated (group) basis</li>\r\n<li>For foreign companies, assess only the Norwegian part of the business</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n<li><strong>Non-Norwegian companies:</strong> confirm taxable presence in Norway (e.g., subsidiary, branch, or other business activity)</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><strong>Sources to consult</strong>:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Transparency Act Statement (published annually; indicates the company is in scope). Sometimes companies also indicate this within other legal statements such as Modern Slavery Act statements.</li>\r\n<li>Company annual reports and financial statements (revenue, assets, employee count)</li>\r\n<li>Company websites and investor relations pages (operations in Norway, subsidiaries, and group structure)</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Norwegian Transparency Act report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Norwegian_Transparency_Act_Applicability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23242380,
      "name": "GreenDex+Mean Gender Bonus Pay Gap (researched)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Mean_Gender_Bonus_Pay_Gap_researched.json",
      "designer": "GreenDex",
      "title": "Mean Gender Bonus Pay Gap (researched)",
      "question": "What is the average gender pay gap present within the company's bonus pay? \r\nNegative values represent female pay being greater than male pay on average.",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Research Document",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": "%",
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Wage Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Mean_Gender_Pay_Gap_Bonus_Pay.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/GreenDex+Mean_Gender_Bonus_Pay_Gap_researched+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23251995,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Commitment to Remedy Adverse Impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_Remedy_Adverse_Impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Commitment to Remedy Adverse Impacts",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement\ncommitting it to remedy the adverse impacts on\nindividuals and workers and communities that it has\ncaused or contributed to?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Commitment to Remedy Adverse Impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_Remedy_Adverse_Impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_Remedy_Adverse_Impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252007,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Business Relationship Commitment to Remedy Adverse Impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Business_Relationship_Commitment_to_Remedy_Adverse_Impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Business Relationship Commitment to Remedy Adverse Impacts",
      "question": "Does the company expect its business relationships to commit to the right to remedy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Business Relationship Commitment to Remedy Adverse Impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Business_Relationship_Commitment_to_Remedy_Adverse_Impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Business_Relationship_Commitment_to_Remedy_Adverse_Impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252019,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Stakeholder Involvement Identifying Human Rights Risk and Impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Stakeholder_Involvement_Identifying_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Stakeholder Involvement Identifying Human Rights Risk and Impacts",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it involves affected stakeholders and internal or independent\nexternal human rights experts in its human rights risks and impacts identification process(es)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Stakeholder Involvement Identifying Human Rights Risk and Impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Stakeholder_Involvement_Identifying_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Stakeholder_Involvement_Identifying_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252031,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Assessing Human Rights Risks and Impacts Processes (Supply Chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessing_Human_Rights_Risks_and_Impacts_Processes_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Assessing Human Rights Risks and Impacts Processes (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "Does the company describe the process(es) it has in place to assess its human rights risks and\nimpacts in its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Assessing Human Rights Risks and Impacts Processes (Supply Chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessing_Human_Rights_Risks_and_Impacts_Processes_Supply_Chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessing_Human_Rights_Risks_and_Impacts_Processes_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252043,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Stakeholder Involvement Assessing Human Rights Risk and Impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Stakeholder_Involvement_Assessing_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Stakeholder Involvement Assessing Human Rights Risk and Impacts",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it involves affected stakeholders in its human rights risks and\nimpact assessment process(es)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Stakeholder Involvement Assessing Human Rights Risk and Impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Stakeholder_Involvement_Assessing_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Stakeholder_Involvement_Assessing_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252055,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Assessing Human Rights Risks and Impacts Processes (Own Operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessing_Human_Rights_Risks_and_Impacts_Processes_Own_Operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Assessing Human Rights Risks and Impacts Processes (Own Operations)",
      "question": "Does the company describe the process(es) it has in place to assess its human rights risks and\nimpacts and discloses what it considers to be its salient human rights issues, covering its own\noperations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Assessing Human Rights Risks and Impacts Processes (Own Operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessing_Human_Rights_Risks_and_Impacts_Processes_Own_Operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessing_Human_Rights_Risks_and_Impacts_Processes_Own_Operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252067,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Integrating and Acting on Human Rights Risk and Impact Assessments (Own Operations)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Integrating_and_Acting_on_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impact_Assessments_Own_Operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Integrating and Acting on Human Rights Risk and Impact Assessments (Own Operations)",
      "question": "Does the company describe the process(es) it has in place to prevent, mitigate or remediate its salient human rights issues in its own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Integrating and Acting on Human Rights Risk and Impact Assessments (Own Operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Integrating_and_Acting_on_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impact_Assessments_Own_Operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Integrating_and_Acting_on_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impact_Assessments_Own_Operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252079,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Integrating and Acting on Human Rights Risk and Impact Assessments (Supply Chain)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Integrating_and_Acting_on_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impact_Assessments_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Integrating and Acting on Human Rights Risk and Impact Assessments (Supply Chain)",
      "question": "Does the company describe the process(es) it has in place to prevent, mitigate or remediate its salient human rights issues in its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Integrating and Acting on Human Rights Risk and Impact Assessments (Supply Chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Integrating_and_Acting_on_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impact_Assessments_Supply_Chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Integrating_and_Acting_on_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impact_Assessments_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252091,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Specific Actions Taken on human rights risks and impact assessments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Specific_Actions_Taken_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Specific Actions Taken on human rights risks and impact assessments",
      "question": "Does the company provide an example of the specific actions taken or to be taken on at least one\nof its salient human rights issues as a result of assessment process(es) in at least one of its\nactivities/operations in the last three years?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Specific Actions Taken on human rights risks and impact assessments+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Specific_Actions_Taken_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Specific_Actions_Taken_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252103,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Stakeholder involvement acting on human rights risks and impact assessments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Stakeholder_involvement_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Stakeholder involvement acting on human rights risks and impact assessments",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it involves affected stakeholders in decisions about the actions\nto take in response to its salient human rights issues?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Stakeholder involvement acting on human rights risks and impact assessments+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Stakeholder_involvement_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Stakeholder_involvement_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252115,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Living Wage Gap",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_Wage_Gap.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Living Wage Gap",
      "question": "Has the company measured the gap between current wages and living wages for all workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Living Wage Gap+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_Wage_Gap+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_Wage_Gap+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252127,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Gender Balance on Highest Governance Body",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Balance_on_Highest_Governance_Body.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Gender Balance on Highest Governance Body",
      "question": "Does the company maintain a gender balance (between 40-60%) at the highest governance body?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Gender Balance on Highest Governance Body+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1989,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1989,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Balance_on_Highest_Governance_Body+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Balance_on_Highest_Governance_Body+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252139,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Direct financial and in-kind political contributions Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Direct_financial_and_in_kind_political_contributions_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Direct financial and in-kind political contributions Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the total monetary value of financial and in-kind political\ncontributions made directly by the organisation by country and by recipient/beneficiary?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Direct_financial_and_in_kind_political_contributions_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252151,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Indirect financial and in-kind political contributions Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Indirect_financial_and_in_kind_political_contributions_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Indirect financial and in-kind political contributions Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the total monetary value of financial and in-kind political\ncontributions made indirectly by the organisation by country and by recipient/beneficiary,\nincluding its lobbying expenses?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Indirect_financial_and_in_kind_political_contributions_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252163,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Grievance Mechanisms for Workers",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Grievance_Mechanisms_for_Workers.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanisms for Workers",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it has one or more mechanism(s), or participates in a third-party\nor shared mechanism, accessible to all workers to raise complaints or concerns related to the\ncompany without fear of reprisals?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Grievance Mechanisms for Workers+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1994,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1994,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Grievance_Mechanisms_for_Workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Grievance_Mechanisms_for_Workers+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252175,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Grievance Mechanisms for External Individuals and Communities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Grievance_Mechanisms_for_External_Individuals_and_Communities.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanisms for External Individuals and Communities",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it has one or more mechanism(s), or participates in a shared\nmechanism, accessible to all external individuals and communities who may be adversely\nimpacted by the company, or those acting on their behalf, to raise complaints or concerns\nwithout fear of reprisals?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Grievance Mechanisms for External Individuals and Communities+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1994,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1994,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Grievance_Mechanisms_for_External_Individuals_and_Communities+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Grievance_Mechanisms_for_External_Individuals_and_Communities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252187,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Living Wage Business Relationship Evidence",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_Wage_Business_Relationship_Evidence.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Living Wage Business Relationship Evidence",
      "question": "Does the company disclose evidence of activities to further the payment of living wages by its\nbusiness relationships?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Living Wage Business Relationship Evidence+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_Wage_Business_Relationship_Evidence+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_Wage_Business_Relationship_Evidence+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252199,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Fair Working Hours Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Fair_Working_Hours_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Fair Working Hours Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect the ILO conventions on working hours or stating that workers shall not be required to work more than 48 hours in a regular work week or 60 hours including overtime?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Fair Working Hours Commitment+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Fair_Working_Hours_Commitment+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Fair_Working_Hours_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252211,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Fair Working Hours Commitment in Business Relationship Employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Fair_Working_Hours_Commitment_in_Business_Relationship_Employees.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Fair Working Hours Commitment in Business Relationship Employees",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement that expects its business relationships to commit to respecting the ILO conventions on working hours or not require workers to work more than 48 hours in a regular work week or 60 hours including overtime?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Fair Working Hours Commitment in Business Relationship Employees+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Fair_Working_Hours_Commitment_in_Business_Relationship_Employees+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Fair_Working_Hours_Commitment_in_Business_Relationship_Employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23252223,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Workforce Other Diversity Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workforce_Other_Diversity_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Workforce Other Diversity Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each\nemployee category by one or more additional indicators of diversity (e.g., race and ethnicity,\ndisability)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "This metric was designed by The World Benchmarking Alliance, more information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark|here]]. The Methodology and scoring guidelines can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/social-benchmark#methodology|here]] <br>\n<br>\nWBA benchmarks integrate a common set of core social indicators into all system transformation methodologies to assess whether companies demonstrate a sufficient commitment to responsible conduct. These indicators are used to assess companies, regardless of the sector in which they operate.<br>\n<br>\nThese indicators also make up the Social Benchmark that assesses the world’s 2,000 most influential companies – also known as the SDG2000 – on their responsibility to meet society’s fundamental expectations towards respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically.<br>\n<br>\nTogether, these companies directly employ 95 million people and hundreds of millions more through their supply chains, and generate USD 45 trillion in revenue each year – the equivalent of 45% of global GDP. If they all met these expectations regarding socially responsible business conduct, we would make massive strides towards a more sustainable and equitable world. However, results reveal that there are significant gaps and areas that companies urgently need to progress on.",
      "methodology": "WBA analysed all publicly available group-level disclosure in English on the applicable group website, which was predominantly annual reports and sustainability reports. Draft assessments were then sent to each company inviting them to provide feedback. This feedback could include additional publicly available group disclosure published. These were then reviewed and finalised. Final assessments were then shared with each company before being published online.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Workforce Other Diversity Disclosure+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1987,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1987,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workforce_Other_Diversity_Disclosure+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workforce_Other_Diversity_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23424749,
      "name": "Fashion Revolution+Discloses Percentage of Workers Paid By Piece Rate+Vasiliki Gkatziaki",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Percentage_of_Workers_Paid_By_Piece_Rate+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki.json",
      "designer": "Fashion Revolution",
      "title": "Discloses Percentage of Workers Paid By Piece Rate",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 704,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 256,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Towards_Paying_Living_Wages_Score_2023.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Fashion_Revolution+Discloses_Percentage_of_Workers_Paid_By_Piece_Rate+Vasiliki_Gkatziaki+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435144,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Identification of material sustainability impacts in operations and value chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Identification_of_material_sustainability_impacts_in_operations_and_value_chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Identification of material sustainability impacts in operations and value chain",
      "question": "Does the company identify material sustainability impacts across its operations and value chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Impact materiality assessments allow companies to identify and prioritise their most<br>\nsignificant environmental, social and governance impacts. Embedding the results into their<br>\nsustainability strategy ensures that companies address these critical areas effectively, enhancing their<br>\nlong-term resilience and aligning the company’s operations with the SDGs.<br>\n<br>\nThe company must conduct an impact or sustainability materiality assessment and meet both of the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\nThe company must disclose material impacts across its operations and value chain. <br>\nThe organization must describe the criteria, sources or evidence it has used to identify and judge the materiality of the impacts. It must be clear that identified material sustainability impacts are based on actual or potential impacts, not merely the result of stakeholder preferences.<br>\n<br>\nExamples of criteria:<br>\nMagnitude of impact<br>\nLikelihood of impact<br>\nDuration of impact<br>\nSeverity or irreversibility<br>\n<br>\nExamples of sources and external standards and frameworks:<br>\nPublicly available company data and reports<br>\nAcademic and scientific research<br>\nIndustry best practices<br>\nNGO reports<br>\nGlobal Reporting Initiative (GRI): Provides guidelines for materiality assessments and impact reporting<br>\nSustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB): Industry-specific standards for material sustainability issues<br>\nTask Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD): Focused on climate risks and impacts.<br>\nTask Force on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD): Focused on environmental risks and impacts<br>\nUnited Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Identifies key global challenges that businesses can align with.<br>\nGuidance from regulatory bodies (e.g., European Commission‚Äôs Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive)<br>\n<br>\nTypes of evidence:<br>\nScenario and impact modelling<br>\nThird-party audits<br>\nBenchmark data<br>\nQuantitative data: e.g. measurements<br>\nQualitative data: e.g. interviews, case studies",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Identification_of_material_sustainability_impacts_in_operations_and_value_chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435160,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Identification and prioritisation of material sustainability impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Identification_and_prioritisation_of_material_sustainability_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Identification and prioritisation of material sustainability impacts",
      "question": "Does the company identify and prioritise its most material impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Impact materiality assessments allow companies to identify and prioritise their most significant environmental, social and governance impacts. Embedding the results into their sustainability strategy ensures that companies address these critical areas effectively, enhancing their long-term resilience and aligning the company’s operations with the SDGs.<br>\n<br>\nThe company must conduct an impact or sustainability materiality assessment and meet both of the following aspects: <br>\nThe company must prioritise a set of material impacts (i.e. to act upon and report) based on their significance. A materiality matrix with an impact materiality axis alone is insufficient; the company must explicitly and unambiguously identify which material impacts it will prioritize.<br>\nThe company must describe the process, method, rationale or criteria used for prioritizing these impacts.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Identification_and_prioritisation_of_material_sustainability_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435172,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Stakeholders and experts consulted in determining material impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Stakeholders_and_experts_consulted_in_determining_material_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Stakeholders and experts consulted in determining material impacts",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the stakeholders and experts consulted in determining its material impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Impact materiality assessments allow companies to identify and prioritise their most significant environmental, social and governance impacts. Embedding the results into their sustainability strategy ensures that companies address these critical areas effectively, enhancing their long-term resilience and aligning the company’s operations with the SDGs.<br>\n<br>\nThe company must consult relevant stakeholders (e.g. individuals and communities most directly impacted by the company) and/or experts to inform the identification of its material impacts and disclose who they are.It is not necessary to identify stakeholders by name (e.g. WBA, WWF), as confidentiality agreements may apply; general descriptions of the types of stakeholders and experts consulted are acceptable.<br>\n<br>\nStakeholders (a-c) and/or relevant experts (d-g) must include at least one of the following categories:<br>\naEmployees (if they are directly impacted parties)<br>\nbIndigenous peoples, local communities, and marginalized communities<br>\nc NGOs and advocacy groups (representing the interests of directly impacted groups)<br>\ndAcademia, scientific, and technical experts<br>\neLabor unions and workers‚Äô councils<br>\nfNGOs and advocacy groups<br>\ngYouth and student organizations",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Stakeholders_and_experts_consulted_in_determining_material_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435188,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sustainability strategy covering material impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainability_strategy_covering_material_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sustainability strategy covering material impacts",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a sustainability strategy covering its material impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Impact materiality assessments allow companies to identify and prioritise their most significant environmental, social and governance impacts. Embedding the results into their<br>\nsustainability strategy ensures that companies address these critical areas effectively, enhancing their long-term resilience and aligning the company’s operations with the SDGs.<br>\n<br>\nThe company must have a specific document clearly and explicitly labelled as a ‚sustainability strategy,\" or a clearly identifiable stand-alone section(s) in another document that describes its sustainability strategy. This strategy must include all the following three aspects:<br>\nThe strategy must include forward looking aspects.<br>\nThe strategy must focus on integrating environmental, social and economic development (e.g. improving local conditions; increasing employment) considerations into its business, operations and planning. Hence the sustainability strategy shall not be seen as a separate, peripheral activity, but as central to the company‚Äôs operations. <br>\nThe strategy must at least cover the priority material impacts (A01.B).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainability_strategy_covering_material_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435200,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Targets covering all priority material impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Targets_covering_all_priority_material_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Targets covering all priority material impacts",
      "question": "Does the company set targets covering all its priority material impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Having concrete targets and plans allows companies to track progress and demonstrate<br>\naccountability towards their most material sustainability issues. Transparency in relation to targets and<br>\nplans ensures that the improvements companies make are measurable and impactful.The company must disclose time-bound and measurable targets for each of the priority material impacts (A01.B). <br>\nEven if the company does not describe the process, method, rationale, or criteria used to prioritize its impacts, it can still meet this element as long as it clearly links each priority material impacts with time-bound and measurable targets. <br>\n<br>\nIf a priority material impact is not covered by a target, the company must specify why. The company must also describe progress made towards addressing the priority material topic. <br>\nThe reason, for example, may be because outcome-oriented targets are not applicable, or because the impact will be addressed via a policy or action plan.<br>\nProgress refers to alternative measures used to track performance on the topic, such as specific performance metrics or other measures of success.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Targets_covering_all_priority_material_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435212,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting against all targets covering priority material impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_against_all_targets_covering_priority_material_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting against all targets covering priority material impacts",
      "question": "Does the company report against all the targets covering its priority material impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Having concrete targets and plans allows companies to track progress and demonstrate<br>\naccountability towards their most material sustainability issues. Transparency in relation to targets and<br>\nplans ensures that the improvements companies make are measurable and impactful.The company must provide information regarding its progress towards all of the targets covering its priority material impacts. <br>\nIf the company does not set targets covering all its priority material impacts (A02.A), it cannot meet this element. <br>\nIf the company is off-track on any of its targets, it must explain why this is the case.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_against_all_targets_covering_priority_material_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435228,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Action plans for implementing sustainability strategy and targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Action_plans_for_implementing_sustainability_strategy_and_targets.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Action plans for implementing sustainability strategy and targets",
      "question": "Does the company disclose action plans for implementing its sustainability strategy and targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Having concrete targets and plans allows companies to track progress and demonstrate<br>\naccountability towards their most material sustainability issues. Transparency in relation to targets and<br>\nplans ensures that the improvements companies make are measurable and impactful.The company provides detailed descriptions of relevant and achievable short-term actions it expects to implement each of the priority material impacts (A01.B). If a priority material impact is not covered by a target, the action plan for that impact must be time-bound.<br>\nDepending on the content of the strategy, the action plans may refer to the continuation of existing initiatives and/or future initiatives. <br>\nEven if the company does not describe the process, method, rationale, or criteria used to prioritize its impacts, it can still meet this element as long as it clearly links each priority material impacts along with time-bound and measurable targets. <br>\nUnlike setting targets for priority material impacts (A02.A) to understand what the company wants to achieve, this element looks at how the company plans to get there.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Action_plans_for_implementing_sustainability_strategy_and_targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435240,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Resource allocation for implementing sustainability strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Resource_allocation_for_implementing_sustainability_strategy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Resource allocation for implementing sustainability strategy",
      "question": "Does the company allocate resources to implement its sustainability strategy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Having concrete targets and plans allows companies to track progress and demonstrate<br>\naccountability towards their most material sustainability issues. Transparency in relation to targets and<br>\nplans ensures that the improvements companies make are measurable and impactful.The company must identify the financial or human resources needed to implement its sustainability strategy, targets and/or plans. As this element is directly linked to the sustainability strategy (A01.D), targets (A02.A) and action plans (A02.C), a company cannot meet this element if it does not meet any of those three elements. If no additional resources are disclosed, the company must clearly state that no additional resources are necessary to implement its sustainability strategy. This may be, for example, because existing resources are sufficient.<br>\n<br>\nFor the resources that the company disclosed:<br>\nThe identified resources can be quantitative, such as financial allocation, or qualitative, such as the recruitment of a new role to lead a project.<br>\nDepending on the content of the strategy, the resources may refer to the continuation of existing allocation and/or future allocation.<br>\nCosts associated with the strategy, such as write-downs, site remediation, contract penalties, regulatory costs, are accepted as resources. <br>\nSite- or topic-specific investments are acceptable as long as they cover any of the priority material topics (A01.B).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Resource_allocation_for_implementing_sustainability_strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435252,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sustainability strategy responsibility assigned to highest governance body",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainability_strategy_responsibility_assigned_to_highest_governance_body.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sustainability strategy responsibility assigned to highest governance body",
      "question": "Does the company assign responsibility for its sustainability strategy to its highest governance body?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Assigning responsibility for sustainability decision-making and oversight to the highest<br>\ngovernance body ensures strategic alignment and accountability at the top level. Additionally, having<br>\ndedicated sustainability functions, teams or committees can drive effective implementation of the<br>\nsustainability strategy across the organisation. Linking senior executives’ remuneration to<br>\nsustainability targets and having a supervisory board with relevant expertise incentivises leadership to<br>\nprioritise and achieve meaningful progress on the company’s most material sustainability issues.This element assesses if companies assign responsibility for sustainability-related decision-making and oversight, including transition planning and climate change mitigation, to the highest governance body.Attributes required: Highest governance body responsible for the broader sustainability strategy and for climate change mitigation strategy/transition plan.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainability_strategy_responsibility_assigned_to_highest_governance_body+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435264,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Functions, teams or committees responsible for implementing sustainability plans",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Functions_teams_or_committees_responsible_for_implementing_sustainability_plans.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Functions, teams or committees responsible for implementing sustainability plans",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the functions, teams or committees that are responsible for the implementation of its sustainability plans?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Assigning responsibility for sustainability decision-making and oversight to the highest<br>\ngovernance body ensures strategic alignment and accountability at the top level. Additionally, having<br>\ndedicated sustainability functions, teams or committees can drive effective implementation of the<br>\nsustainability strategy across the organisation. Linking senior executives’ remuneration to<br>\nsustainability targets and having a supervisory board with relevant expertise incentivises leadership to<br>\nprioritise and achieve meaningful progress on the company’s most material sustainability issues.Companies are expected to disclose which functions, teams, or committees are responsible for implementing its sustainability plans, strategies, or activities, including those related to transition planning and climate change mitigation. It is sufficient to list the function, teams, and committees that are assigned responsibility; the allocation of responsibility between them need not be specified.**Attributes required:** Functions, teams or committees responsible for the implementation of sustainability plans, strategies, or activities, including climate change mitigation strategy/transition plan.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Functions_teams_or_committees_responsible_for_implementing_sustainability_plans+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435280,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Senior executive remuneration linked to sustainability targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Senior_executive_remuneration_linked_to_sustainability_targets.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Senior executive remuneration linked to sustainability targets",
      "question": "Does the company link senior executive remuneration to its sustainability targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Assigning responsibility for sustainability decision-making and oversight to the highest<br>\ngovernance body ensures strategic alignment and accountability at the top level. Additionally, having<br>\ndedicated sustainability functions, teams or committees can drive effective implementation of the<br>\nsustainability strategy across the organisation. Linking senior executives’ remuneration to<br>\nsustainability targets and having a supervisory board with relevant expertise incentivises leadership to<br>\nprioritise and achieve meaningful progress on the company’s most material sustainability issues.This element assesses if companies explicitly link senior executives' remuneration to metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) related to GHG emissions reductions, within its long-term incentive plan (likely to include equity in the company).Furthermore, additional environmental and/or social metrics and KPIs that are material to the company (e.g., percentage of sustainable sourcing of materials, single use plastic reduction, etc.) are expected to be linked to senior executives‚Äô remuneration.Climate targets are required to be linked to long-term incentives, whereas this is not mandatory for environmental and social targets.**Attributes required:** GHG emissions reduction metrics and KPIs linked to senior executives‚Äô remuneration through long-term incentive plans. Environmental and/or social targets in executive compensation structures.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Senior_executive_remuneration_linked_to_sustainability_targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435292,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Highest governance body expertise in material sustainability topics",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Highest_governance_body_expertise_in_material_sustainability_topics.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Highest governance body expertise in material sustainability topics",
      "question": "Does the company's highest governance body have expertise with respect to its material sustainability topics?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Assigning responsibility for sustainability decision-making and oversight to the highest<br>\ngovernance body ensures strategic alignment and accountability at the top level. Additionally, having<br>\ndedicated sustainability functions, teams or committees can drive effective implementation of the<br>\nsustainability strategy across the organisation. Linking senior executives’ remuneration to<br>\nsustainability targets and having a supervisory board with relevant expertise incentivises leadership to<br>\nprioritise and achieve meaningful progress on the company’s most material sustainability issues.The companies are expected to prove that they have adequate climate change and low-carbon transition planning expertise represented at the highest governance body. There has to be at least two instances of expertise/competences related to climate change and the low-carbon transition represented among the members of the highest governance body. The instances are as follows:<br>\n- Academic qualification: An understanding of the impacts, risks and implementable solutions acquired via a bachelor‚Äôs, master‚Äôs or doctoral degree, professional certification, diploma, etc. A purely energy-related background with no relationship to climate change and the low GHG emissions transition is not enough to qualify as expertise.<br>\n- Professional experience: Previous employment with an organisation or in a role related to climate change or the low GHG emissions transition.<br>\n- Recent/active membership of relevant organisations: Positions in organisations driving corporate knowledge and action on climate change and the low GHG emissions transition. Examples include positions in bodies such as the World Business Council For Sustainable Development (WBCSD), or relevant industry associations for the sector the company operates in, such as the Solar Energy Industry Association (SEIA).<br>\n- Technical knowledge: Evidence of knowledge related to climate change and the low GHG emissions transition through recently published outputs written by the individual/committee, such as technical statements, industry reports, etc.The expertise does not all have to be held by one person; it can be distributed across different members of the board or highest governance body. The conditions for this element can also be met in instances where companies describe that the highest governance body has direct access to expertise, such as a specialised committee composed of external experts with a board member as the chairperson. In these cases, it must be specified what the scope of the committee is and how often it meets.Furthermore, the assessment also evaluates whether the highest governance body possesses expertise related to environmental (non-climate) or social impacts. As with the accepted types of expertise on the low-carbon transition, environmental and social expertise must fall within one of the four recognized categories of expertise.While the following list is non-exhaustive, the area of expertise should be relevant to the company‚Äôs material impacts:<br>\n- Environment: biodiversity, ecosystems (e.g., conversion or restoration), circularity, soil health, water, air, hazardous materials, waste, plastic, and invasive species.<br>\n- Social: Human rights. Indigenous people, economic development, labour rights/rights, gender, and nutritionGeneral references to expertise or environmental, social, and governance (ESG) competence are insufficient, as they may reflect familiarity with reporting rather than expertise on actual impacts. Furthermore, competency matrices disclosed by companies alone do not suffice. Claimed expertise must be supported by objective evidence, such as detailed biographies of board members, so that relevant experience can be clearly classified under one of the four aforementioned types of expertise.\\*\\*Attributes required: \\*\\*Types and frequency of low-carbon transition-related expertise or competencies among members of the highest governance body, as well as the presence of environmental and social impact expertise within the body.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Highest_governance_body_expertise_in_material_sustainability_topics+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435308,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Interface with ecologically sensitive locations identified",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Interface_with_ecologically_sensitive_locations_identified.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Interface with ecologically sensitive locations identified",
      "question": "Does the company identify its interface with ecologically sensitive locations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The private sector has historically been one of the main contributors to environmental<br>\ndegradation. It is crucial for companies to reverse this trend to ensure a sustainable future, and a vital<br>\nfirst step in this process is for them to transparently disclose their impacts on nature. Frameworks<br>\nprovided by organisations such as Business for Nature, Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Nature Action<br>\n100 (NA100) and the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) offer comprehensive<br>\nguidelines to help companies report and mitigate their environmental footprints.Companies must disclose the locations of assets or activities in the organization’s direct operations (and where possible, value chain) that are in or near ecologically sensitive locations, following [TNFD guidance (pg. 58)](https://tnfd.global/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Guidance_on_the_identification_and_assessment_of_nature-related_Issues_The_TNFD_LEAP_approach_V1.1_October2023.pdf?v=1698403116). <br>\n<br>\nIf the company reports that none of its operations are located in or near ecologically sensitive locations, in order for the element to be met, the company must provide justification with a methodology or tool used for determination, and additionally report which products and services in its value chain have the most significant impacts on nature, as well as the countries or jurisdictions where the activities associated with these products and services take place.<br>\n<br>\nSensitive locations include any of the following:<br>\nAreas important for biodiversity (e.g. protected areas, biodiversity hotspots, areas important for species, areas containing rare or threatened ecosystems, ecological corridors.)<br>\nAreas of high ecosystem integrity (e.g. areas that contain large opportunities for safeguarding stocks of environmental assets and maintaining ecosystem service provision.)<br>\nAreas of rapid decline in ecosystem integrity (e.g. areas with declining resilience of ecosystem service provision, areas with high exposure to an organisation’s dependency-related risks, areas potentially at risk of ecological tipping points.)<br>\nAreas of high physical water risks (e.g. limited water availability, flooding, poor quality of water.)<br>\nAreas of importance for ecosystem service provision (e.g. areas in which healthy ecosystems and biodiversity support local livelihoods, areas in which biodiversity and ecosystem services are important for the realisation of human rights, areas important for Indigenous Peoples and local communities.)<br>\n<br>\nIn addition to the guidance provided in the LEAP approach, organizations can use other metrics and datasets for identifying and measuring sensitive locations. Examples include:<br>\n- Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs) dataset;<br>\n- The IMMA e-Atlas Marine Mammal Protected Areas Task Force;<br>\n- Ocean+ Habitat Datasets;<br>\n- The FAO Database for Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems (VMEs);<br>\n- The Mapping Ocean Wealth Explorer – in particular, the mangroves dataset;<br>\n- The OSPAR List of Threatened and/or Declining Habitats;<br>\n- IMO’s Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas;<br>\n- Birdlife International’s List of Important Bird Areas;<br>\n- Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) – in particular, those with a no-take policy in place;<br>\n- Coastal Risk Index; and<br>\n- Convex Seascape Survey<br>\n- CBD Ecologically or biologically significant marine areas.<br>\n- FAO Vulnerable marine ecosystems.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Interface_with_ecologically_sensitive_locations_identified+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435320,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Assessment of impact drivers related to changes in the state of nature",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessment_of_impact_drivers_related_to_changes_in_the_state_of_nature.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Assessment of impact drivers related to changes in the state of nature",
      "question": "Does the company assess its impact drivers related to changes in the state of nature?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The private sector has historically been one of the main contributors to environmental<br>\ndegradation. It is crucial for companies to reverse this trend to ensure a sustainable future, and a vital<br>\nfirst step in this process is for them to transparently disclose their impacts on nature. Frameworks<br>\nprovided by organisations such as Business for Nature, Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Nature Action<br>\n100 (NA100) and the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) offer comprehensive<br>\nguidelines to help companies report and mitigate their environmental footprints.Companies must: <br>\n<br>\nExplicitly identify their most material impact drivers (following [TNFD guidance](https://tnfd.global/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Guidance_on_the_identification_and_assessment_of_nature-related_Issues_The_TNFD_LEAP_approach_V1.1_October2023.pdf?v=1698403116), pg. 70), and<br>\nQuantify at least one of them (e.g. size in hectares of ecosystems converted, quantity of wild species harvested, water withdrawal in megalitres, etc.).<br>\n<br>\nThe impact drivers can include a company’s own operations, their value chain, or a combination thereof. Impact drivers that are covered by other Nature indicators should only be considered in for this element if the company itself identifies them as impact drivers affecting the state of nature, for example, as be an explicit reference to these drivers being associated with its main impacts on ecosystems or species.<br>\n<br>\nPossible impact drivers include:<br>\n<br>\n**Land-/freshwater-/ocean-use change** <br>\nLand-use change<br>\nFreshwater-use change<br>\nOcean-use change<br>\n<br>\n**Climate change**<br>\nGreenhouse gas emissions<br>\n<br>\n**Resource use/replenishment**<br>\nWater use<br>\nSpecies harvested/hunted<br>\nMaterials harvested/extracted<br>\nOther resources<br>\n<br>\n**Pollution**<br>\nAir pollution (non-greenhouse gases)<br>\nWater pollution<br>\nSoil pollution<br>\nWaste<br>\nDisturbances<br>\n<br>\n**Invasive species and other**<br>\nBiological alterations<br>\n<br>\nExamples of tools that companies may refer to include:<br>\nSBTN Materiality Screening Tool<br>\nSBTN High Impact Commodity List<br>\nTNFD LEAP<br>\nNatural Capital Protocol<br>\nENCORE",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessment_of_impact_drivers_related_to_changes_in_the_state_of_nature+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435332,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Assessment of impact on ecosystems and species",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessment_of_impact_on_ecosystems_and_species.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Assessment of impact on ecosystems and species",
      "question": "Does the company assess its impact on ecosystems and species?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The private sector has historically been one of the main contributors to environmental<br>\ndegradation. It is crucial for companies to reverse this trend to ensure a sustainable future, and a vital<br>\nfirst step in this process is for them to transparently disclose their impacts on nature. Frameworks<br>\nprovided by organisations such as Business for Nature, Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Nature Action<br>\n100 (NA100) and the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) offer comprehensive<br>\nguidelines to help companies report and mitigate their environmental footprints.Companies must disclose changes in the state of nature** **(which encapsulates ecosystems, species or biodiversity)** **at location(s) impacted by their operations, or their value chain, using science-based metrics. For a list of metrics, please consult the [TNFD guidance](https://tnfd.global/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Guidance_on_the_identification_and_assessment_of_nature-related_Issues_The_TNFD_LEAP_approach_V1.1_October2023.pdf?v=1698403116), p. 208.<br>\n<br>\nExamples of databases/tools that can be used to guide companies to measure environmental impacts include:<br>\nIntegrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool (IBAT)<br>\nWWF Biodiversity Risk Filter<br>\nGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF)<br>\nWorld Database on Protected Areas (WDPA).<br>\nIntegrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) <br>\nGlobal Biodiversity Standard (GBS)<br>\nIUCN Red List of Threatened Species<br>\nKey Biodiversity Areas (KBA)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessment_of_impact_on_ecosystems_and_species+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435348,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Assessment of societal impacts from impacts on nature",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessment_of_societal_impacts_from_impacts_on_nature.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Assessment of societal impacts from impacts on nature",
      "question": "Does the company assess the impacts to society stemming from its impacts on nature?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The private sector has historically been one of the main contributors to environmental<br>\ndegradation. It is crucial for companies to reverse this trend to ensure a sustainable future, and a vital<br>\nfirst step in this process is for them to transparently disclose their impacts on nature. Frameworks<br>\nprovided by organisations such as Business for Nature, Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Nature Action<br>\n100 (NA100) and the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) offer comprehensive<br>\nguidelines to help companies report and mitigate their environmental footprints.Companies must quantify impacts to people stemming from its impact on nature. This can be done, for example, by:<br>\nApplying environmental valuation techniques (either monetary or non-monetary) to assess the impact to society stemming from the company’s impacts on nature.<br>\nQuantifying numbers of people impacted.<br>\n<br>\nDatabases/tools that can be used to measure environmental values include:<br>\nEnvironmental Profit & Loss (EP&L)<br>\nNatural Capital Protocol<br>\nUN-SEAA EA",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessment_of_societal_impacts_from_impacts_on_nature+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435364,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Assessment of dependence on ecosystem services",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessment_of_dependence_on_ecosystem_services.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Assessment of dependence on ecosystem services",
      "question": "Does the company assess its dependence on ecosystem services?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Ecosystem services are the benefits that humans derive from ecosystems and on which<br>\nhuman life and activities, including corporate activities, rely. Research shows that more than 50% of<br>\nglobal gross domestic product is directly linked to these ecosystem services (WEF and PwC, 2020),<br>\nexposing companies to significant nature-related dependencies, risks and opportunities. The 2024<br>\nGlobal Risks Report shows that the top four risks identified over the next ten years are all<br>\nenvironmental: extreme weather events, critical change to Earth systems, biodiversity loss and<br>\necosystem collapse, and natural resource shortages. Understanding and disclosing these factors is<br>\nessential for companies to develop resilient strategies and contribute to a sustainable economyCompanies must: <br>\n**Identify the main ways it is dependent on nature **(e.g. **ecosystem services** or **nature’s contributions to people**). This could include both direct dependence for their own operations or indirect dependence via their value chain. The dependence must be made explicit by the company. Vague or general references to a dependence on nature are insufficient to meet this element. Companies can use, for example, the ENCORE tool to identify those for their industry.<br>\n**Quantify the extent of dependence** on at least one identified ecosystem service, expressed in relevant units such as volume, area, or monetary value, to highlight the significance of these services to their business operations.<br>\n<br>\nExample metrics that can be used for **quantifying the extent of dependence**:<br>\n**Volume or quantity**: For provisioning services, measure the amount of water, raw materials, species, or products sourced from the environment.<br>\n**Economic value**: Assess the economic value contributed by each service to the business, which for example could include cost savings from natural water purification versus mechanical methods or revenues generated from ecotourism.<br>\n**Area**: For land-based services, calculate the area of ecosystem crucial for maintaining regulatory and supporting services. For example, geographic information systems (GIS) can be used to map and quantify area-based services.<br>\n<br>\n**Ecosystem Services** are the benefits that humans receive from the natural environment which include: <br>\n**Provisioning services**: Products obtained from ecosystems, such as organisms, food, water, timber, and fiber.<br>\n**Regulation and maintenance services**: Benefits obtained from the regulation and maintenance of ecosystem processes, including pollination, air quality maintenance, climate regulation, water purification, soil quality regulation, and flood and disease control.<br>\n**Cultural services**: Non-material benefits obtained from ecosystems such as recreation, education, spiritual enrichment, cognitive development, reflection, and aesthetic experiences.<br>\n<br>\n**[Nature’s Contributions to People (NCP)](https://www.ipbes.net/glossary-tag/natures-contributions-people)** is the concept favoured by [IPBES](https://www.ipbes.net/). They include the contributions, both positive and negative, of nature to the quality of life of people. NCP can be categorized into three partially overlapping categories:<br>\n**Material contributions**: substances, objects or other material elements from nature that directly sustain people’s physical existence and material assets, including food, energy and materials.<br>\n**Non-material contributions:** nature’s effects on subjective or psychological aspects underpinning people’s quality of life. This includes things like learning and inspiration, experiences and recreation, and supporting identities.<br>\n**Regulating contributions**: functional and structural aspects of organisms and ecosystems that modify environmental conditions experienced by people, or those that regulate the generation of material and non-material contributions. These include things like pollination, regulation of air and water quality, and regulation of climate and hazards.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessment_of_dependence_on_ecosystem_services+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435376,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Assessment of nature-related opportunities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessment_of_nature_related_opportunities.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Assessment of nature-related opportunities",
      "question": "Does the company assess its nature-related opportunities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Ecosystem services are the benefits that humans derive from ecosystems and on which<br>\nhuman life and activities, including corporate activities, rely. Research shows that more than 50% of<br>\nglobal gross domestic product is directly linked to these ecosystem services (WEF and PwC, 2020),<br>\nexposing companies to significant nature-related dependencies, risks and opportunities. The 2024<br>\nGlobal Risks Report shows that the top four risks identified over the next ten years are all<br>\nenvironmental: extreme weather events, critical change to Earth systems, biodiversity loss and<br>\necosystem collapse, and natural resource shortages. Understanding and disclosing these factors is<br>\nessential for companies to develop resilient strategies and contribute to a sustainable economyCompanies must:<br>\n<br>\nIdentify nature-related opportunities that could impact their business positively.<br>\nQuantify the potential benefits of these opportunities (e.g., how it can enhance operational efficiencies, reduce costs, or open new revenue streams), using financial metrics or qualitative descriptions to articulate the anticipated value to the business.<br>\n<br>\nNature-related opportunities, following [TNFD guidance](https://tnfd.global/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Recommendations_of_the_Taskforce_on_Nature-related_Financial_Disclosures_September_2023.pdf?v=1695118661) (p. 36), are activities that create positive outcomes for organisations and nature through (i.) positive impacts or (ii.) mitigation of negative impacts on nature. These can be split into two categories, which are not mutually exclusive:<br>\n<br>\n**Business performance opportunities**:<br>\n**Markets: **Access to new markets or locations arising from changes to things like consumer demands, consumer and investor sentiment, and stakeholder dynamics.<br>\n**Products and services**: Developing new products or services that capitalize on environmental conservation and restoration, such as eco-tourism or sustainable product lines.<br>\n**Resource efficiency**: Improvements in the efficiency of natural resource use, such as energy, water, and raw materials, which reduce costs and enhance resilience.<br>\n**Capital flow and financing: **Attracting** **investors interested in sustainable practices, potentially leading to improved financing conditions.** **<br>\n**Reputational capital**: Enhancing brand reputation by actively engaging in natural capital conservation, appealing to a growing base of environmentally conscious consumers.<br>\n****<br>\n**Sustainability performance opportunities**:<br>\n**Sustainable use of natural resources**: Substitution of natural resources by recycled, regenerative, renewable or ethically responsibly sourced organic inputs.<br>\n**Ecosystem protection, restoration, and regeneration**: Activities that support the protection, regeneration or restoration of habitats and ecosystems, including areas both within and outside organisation’s direct control. For example, by investing in green infrastructure like wetland restoration, companies can reduce costs associated with natural hazards or water filtration, leading to operational cost savings.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessment_of_nature_related_opportunities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435392,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Assessment of nature-related risks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessment_of_nature_related_risks.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Assessment of nature-related risks",
      "question": "Does the company assess its nature-related risks?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Ecosystem services are the benefits that humans derive from ecosystems and on which<br>\nhuman life and activities, including corporate activities, rely. Research shows that more than 50% of<br>\nglobal gross domestic product is directly linked to these ecosystem services (WEF and PwC, 2020),<br>\nexposing companies to significant nature-related dependencies, risks and opportunities. The 2024<br>\nGlobal Risks Report shows that the top four risks identified over the next ten years are all<br>\nenvironmental: extreme weather events, critical change to Earth systems, biodiversity loss and<br>\necosystem collapse, and natural resource shortages. Understanding and disclosing these factors is<br>\nessential for companies to develop resilient strategies and contribute to a sustainable economyCompanies must:<br>\nIdentify nature-related risks, and<br>\nQuantify how these risks could impact the company’s operations, financial performance, or reputation, using metrics such as potential financial losses, affected area (in hectares), or other relevant units.<br>\n<br>\nNature-related risks, following [TNFD’s definition](https://tnfd.global/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Recommendations_of_the_Taskforce_on_Nature-related_Financial_Disclosures_September_2023.pdf?v=1695118661) (p. 33), are potential threats posed to an organisation that arise from both its (and society’s) dependencies and impacts on nature.<br>\n<br>\nTypes of nature-related risks:<br>\n<br>\n**Physical Risks** are risks to an organisation that result from the degradation of nature and consequential loss of ecosystem services. These risks are usually location-specific:<br>\n**Acute risks**: Short-term, specific events that change the state of nature. For example, oil spills, forest fires or pests affecting harvests<br>\n**Chronic risks**: Gradual changes to the state of nature. For example, pollution stemming from pesticide use or climate change.<br>\n<br>\n**Transition Risks** are risks to an organisation that result from a misalignment of economic actors with actions aimed at protecting, restoring and/or reducing negative impacts on nature:<br>\n**Policy risks**: Changes in the policy context due to new (or enforcement of existing) policies associated with creating positive impacts on nature or mitigating negative impacts on nature.<br>\n**Market risks**: Changing dynamics in overall markets, including changes in consumer preferences, which arise from other risk categories as a result of changing physical, regulatory, technological and reputational conditions and stakeholder dynamics<br>\n**Technology risks**: Substitution of products or services with a reduced impact on nature and/or reduced dependency on nature.<br>\n**Reputational risks**: Changes in perception concerning an organisation’s actual or perceived nature impacts, including at the local, economic and societal level. This can result from direct company impacts, industry impacts and/or impacts of activities upstream and/or downstream in a value chain.<br>\n**Liability risks**: Risks that arise from legal claims. <br>\n<br>\n**Systemic Risks** are risks to an organisation that arise from the breakdown of the entire system, rather than the failure of individual parts. These risks are characterised by modest tipping points combining indirectly to produce large failures, where one loss triggers a chain of others, and prevents the system from reverting to its prior equilibrium: <br>\n**Ecosystem stability risk**: Risk of the destabilisation of a critical natural system, so it can no longer provide ecosystem services in the same manner as before.<br>\n**Financial stability risk**: Risk that a materialisation and compounding of physical or transition risk leads to the destabilisation of an entire financial system<br>\n<br>\nTools/methodologies that companies can use to assess nature-related risks include but not limited to: <br>\nNatural Capital Protocol<br>\nTaskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD)<br>\nLEAP (Locate, Evaluate, Assess, Prepare) Approach by TNFD",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessment_of_nature_related_risks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435404,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Management of nature-related risks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Management_of_nature_related_risks.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Management of nature-related risks",
      "question": "Does the company manage its nature-related risks?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Ecosystem services are the benefits that humans derive from ecosystems and on which<br>\nhuman life and activities, including corporate activities, rely. Research shows that more than 50% of<br>\nglobal gross domestic product is directly linked to these ecosystem services (WEF and PwC, 2020),<br>\nexposing companies to significant nature-related dependencies, risks and opportunities. The 2024<br>\nGlobal Risks Report shows that the top four risks identified over the next ten years are all<br>\nenvironmental: extreme weather events, critical change to Earth systems, biodiversity loss and<br>\necosystem collapse, and natural resource shortages. Understanding and disclosing these factors is<br>\nessential for companies to develop resilient strategies and contribute to a sustainable economyThe company must provide evidence that it is taking action in response to the identified nature-related risks by carrying out concrete actions or by integrating the nature-related risks into their risk management strategy.<br>\n<br>\nExamples of actions companies can take in response to nature-related risks include:<br>\n**Physical Risks: **<br>\n**Acute Risks** (e.g., typhoons, floods): Companies can implement robust monitoring systems, invest in infrastructure to prevent and respond to extreme events (e.g., embankments, fire breaks), and adopt sustainable resource management practices.<br>\n**Chronic Risks** (e.g., droughts, rising sea levels, temperature shifts): Companies can integrate long-term nature-related risk assessments into their strategies, shift to water-efficient processes, and support ecosystem restoration initiatives to mitigate gradual environmental changes.<br>\n**Transition Risks: **<br>\n**Policy Risks:** Companies can align business strategies with emerging environmental policies and complying with new regulations ahead of enforcement.<br>\n**Market Risks: **Companies can adapt by shifting to sustainable product offerings, embracing eco-friendly packaging, and responding to the growing demand for green alternatives.<br>\n**Technology Risks:** Companies can invest in alternative technologies and develop innovative, low-impact products.<br>\n**Reputational Risks: **Companies can engage with stakeholders on sustainability initiatives and invest in transparency to improve public perception.<br>\n**Liability Risks: **Companies can strengthen environmental risk management practices, implement stricter internal policies, and actively remediate past environmental damage.<br>\n**Systemic Risks: **<br>\n**Ecosystem Stability Risk: **Companies can ensure their supply chains are free from practices that lead to ecosystem degradation and support restoration projects.<br>\n**Financial Stability Risk:** Companies can assess nature-related risks to their business and integrate mitigation strategies.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Management_of_nature_related_risks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435416,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting on activities or commodities posing risk of ecosystem degradation or loss",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_activities_or_commodities_posing_risk_of_ecosystem_degradation_or_loss.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting on activities or commodities posing risk of ecosystem degradation or loss",
      "question": "Does the company report on activities or commodities that pose the risk of ecosystem degradation or loss?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The UN has declared the ten years to 2030 the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration Рa<br>\nrallying call for the protection and restoration of ecosystems for the benefit of both people and<br>\nnature. This indicator aligns with recommended disclosures by the European Sustainability Reporting<br>\nStandards (ESRS), Science Based Targets Network (SBTN) and the Taskforce on Nature-related<br>\nFinancial Disclosures (TNFD), and focuses on ensuring that companies protect and restore impacted<br>\necosystems in their operations and value chain.This element has different requirements based on whether the companies are identified as belonging to industries which have a high land footprint, which include:<br>\nAgricultural products and commodities<br>\nAnimal proteins<br>\nFood and beverage manufacturers/processors<br>\nFood retailers<br>\nRestaurants or food services<br>\nPaper and forest<br>\nOil & gas<br>\nMetals and mining<br>\nConstruction materials<br>\n<br>\nThese companies must disclose quantitative data on at least one of the following: <br>\nIdentify conversion-driving commodities **and** disclose the proportion of these that are deforestation and conversion-free (DCF). Key conversion driving commodities include: timber, palm oil, cattle products, soy, coffee, cocoa, rubber<br>\nReport on the area (i.e. in ha, km2, acres) of land or aquatic habitat that is affected (i.e. converted, lost, or degraded) by its operations, <br>\nReport location information regarding all production units and project sites. These must be demarcated by georeferenced boundaries (i.e., polygons). For sectors with lower land footprints (less than 10 ha), a one point coordinate near the centre of production is sufficient.<br>\nReport on the proportion of land or aquatic ecosystems affected by the company’s operations that have yet to be restored within a given time frame.<br>\nReport quantitative data on any other type of activities or commodities that it has identified as posing risks associated with ecosystem degradation or loss risks associated specifically with land/ water/ ocean-use change <br>\n<br>\nAs an exception to the general scoring principles, the company does not need to have 3 datapoints to meet this element. Only one is required. <br>\n<br>\nCompanies involved in high-impact commodities (HICs) that are not classified as conversion-driving commodities must explicitly identify these in their value chain and disclose at least one of MD2–MD6, as appropriate (see Table 2).<br>\n<br>\nCompanies in other industries can also meet this element if they disclose at least one of the following:<br>\nDisclose activities or commodities that pose ecosystem degradation or loss risks via another impact driver (i.e. resource use, pollution or invasive species). They must make this connection explicitly.<br>\nProvide evidence that they have carried out an assessment that demonstrates that there is no risk of ecosystem degradation or loss via their operations or value chain.<br>\n<br>\nFor the above to be met, the company should provide at least some qualitative indication of the potential severity/ scale of actual or potential ecosystem degradation/ loss caused by the impact driver. Vague or generic references to ecosystem degradation and loss are insufficient.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_activities_or_commodities_posing_risk_of_ecosystem_degradation_or_loss+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435428,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Target to achieve ecosystem protection, restoration or regeneration",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Target_to_achieve_ecosystem_protection_restoration_or_regeneration.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Target to achieve ecosystem protection, restoration or regeneration",
      "question": "Does the company set a target to achieve ecosystem protection, restoration or regeneration?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The UN has declared the ten years to 2030 the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration Рa<br>\nrallying call for the protection and restoration of ecosystems for the benefit of both people and<br>\nnature. This indicator aligns with recommended disclosures by the European Sustainability Reporting<br>\nStandards (ESRS), Science Based Targets Network (SBTN) and the Taskforce on Nature-related<br>\nFinancial Disclosures (TNFD), and focuses on ensuring that companies protect and restore impacted<br>\necosystems in their operations and value chain.Companies must provide quantitative and time-bound targets associated with ecosystem protection, restoration or regeneration. Examples of valid targets could relate to:<br>\nAchieving deforestation and conversion-free (DCF) status for **all **of the company’s most relevant conversion-driving commodities. If the company excludes any of its commodities in this target, it must explicitly explain why. Targets must aim for 100% of commodity volumes to be DCF. **A baseline value and year are not required**.<br>\nEnsuring all production sites and project locations adhere to no-conversion standards. For a no-conversion target to be valid, the company must report location information regarding all production units and project sites. Targets that would continue to allow any degradation or conversion (including deforestation) past 2020 are not valid (in alignment with SBTN and the [Accountability Framework initiative](https://accountability-framework.org/fileadmin/uploads/afi/Documents/Operational_Guidance/OG_Environmental_Restoration_Compensation-2020-52.pdf)). Thus, targets that seek to reduce rather than avoid ecosystem conversion or degradation are not valid. **A baseline value and year are required**, and this should be no later than 2020 (based on SBTN guidance). <br>\nA goal to reduce total land footprint. It must be clear that the reduction includes all of the company’s (or its supply chain’s) operations, rather than just a specific site or subset of them, as this could otherwise lead to leakage (reduction in one site offset by an increase in another). **A baseline value and year are required**, and this should be no earlier than 2015.<br>\nA goal to restore degraded ecosystems affected by the company’s operations. **A baseline value and year are required**. Restoration targets are only valid for companies following best practices such as those described by the [Accountability Framework initiative](https://accountability-framework.org/fileadmin/uploads/afi/Documents/Operational_Guidance/OG_Environmental_Restoration_Compensation-2020-52.pdf). These include initiatives such as prioritising restoration in locations with the greatest ecological importance or harm, focusing on reinstating ecological processes and services, prioritising native species in reforestation or habitat rebuilding, ensuring restoration does not displace or degrade surrounding areas, collaborating with local and indigenous communities, or implementing ongoing monitoring to ensure long-term effectiveness. ​<br>\nA goal to source 100% of its commodities from areas known to be conversion-free from 2020. **A baseline value and year are required**.<br>\nA requirement for all direct and indirect suppliers to adopt and implement ecosystem protection, restoration or regeneration targets across their entire businesses. The company must have a non-compliance protocol in place for suppliers. **A baseline value and year are not required.**<br>\n<br>\nIf (i) all the company’s conversion-driving commodities are conversion-free, or (ii) it has 100% restored all degraded ecosystems, or (iii) it provides evidence that they have carried out an assessment that demonstrates that there is no risk of ecosystem degradation or loss via their operations or value chain, they meet this element.<br>\n<br>\nFollowing guidance from SBTN, we may also accept targets with the following format: <br>\n[Company name] will have zero conversion of natural ecosystems by [target year], compared with a 2020 baseline.<br>\n[Company name] will remediate all past conversion occurring between 2020 and [target year].<br>\n[Company name] commits to reduce absolute agricultural land footprint, from direct operations [and upstream impacts], [percent reduction] by [target year] from a [base year] base year.<br>\n[Company name] will source 100% of volumes of commodities from areas known to be conversion-free from 2020.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Target_to_achieve_ecosystem_protection_restoration_or_regeneration+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435444,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting progress towards ecosystem protection, restoration or regeneration",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_progress_towards_ecosystem_protection_restoration_or_regeneration.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting progress towards ecosystem protection, restoration or regeneration",
      "question": "Does the company report progress towards ecosystem protection, restoration or regeneration?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The UN has declared the ten years to 2030 the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration Рa<br>\nrallying call for the protection and restoration of ecosystems for the benefit of both people and<br>\nnature. This indicator aligns with recommended disclosures by the European Sustainability Reporting<br>\nStandards (ESRS), Science Based Targets Network (SBTN) and the Taskforce on Nature-related<br>\nFinancial Disclosures (TNFD), and focuses on ensuring that companies protect and restore impacted<br>\necosystems in their operations and value chain.The company must report quantitate progress over 3 consecutive years. If the company has a target, it must report progress against it. If the company does not have a target, it must demonstrate it is effectively protecting ecosystems, for example by reporting: <br>\nAn increase in the uptake of DCF-aligned certifications for key commodities (see Table 1) sourced through its supply chain (i.e. an increase in % of commodities certified to DCF standards)<br>\nReductions in the total land footprint. It must be clear that the reduction includes all the company’s (or its supply chain’s) operations, rather than just a specific site or subset of them, as this could otherwise lead to leakage (reduction in one site offset by an increase in another).<br>\nHaving achieved no conversion and providing information regarding all production units and project sites. These must be demarcated by georeferenced boundaries (i.e., polygons), with the exception of small sites (less than 10 ha), for which one point coordinate near the centre of production is sufficient.<br>\nProgress towards full restoration of affected ecosystems. Progress on restoration is only valid for companies following best practices such as those described by the [Accountability Framework initiative](https://accountability-framework.org/fileadmin/uploads/afi/Documents/Operational_Guidance/OG_Environmental_Restoration_Compensation-2020-52.pdf).<br>\n<br>\nIf the company explicitly states and provides evidence to justify that its operations and supply chain have achieved no conversion (e.g. all the company’s high-risk commodities are conversion-free, or it has 100% restored all degraded ecosystems), they meet this element.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_progress_towards_ecosystem_protection_restoration_or_regeneration+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435460,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Disclosure of support for value chain traceability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Disclosure_of_support_for_value_chain_traceability.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Disclosure of support for value chain traceability",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how it supports traceability along the value chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The UN has declared the ten years to 2030 the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration – a<br>\nrallying call for the protection and restoration of ecosystems for the benefit of both people and<br>\nnature. This indicator aligns with recommended disclosures by the European Sustainability Reporting<br>\nStandards (ESRS), Science Based Targets Network (SBTN) and the Taskforce on Nature-related<br>\nFinancial Disclosures (TNFD), and focuses on ensuring that companies protect and restore impacted<br>\necosystems in their operations and value chain.The company must do one of the following:<br>\nProvide a description of traceability systems that are in place, which includes at least an explanation of how the company traces products. The system may be electronic (e.g. using blockchain, RFID tags) or paper-based. A company only mentioning that they have a traceability system without a description or explanation is not enough.<br>\nDisclose the key data elements (KDEs) that they collect. KDEs are crucial pieces of information used in traceability systems to track the movement and history of products through the supply chain (e.g. traceability lot code, date of harvesting, location of extraction, supplier information)<br>\nEngage with others in their value chain to support traceability (e.g. by doing supplier audits, collaboration on data sharing, or joint initiatives to improve traceability). The company must mention concrete outcomes being achieved. <br>\nCollaborate with NGOs or industry initiatives focused on traceability (e.g. Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, or Responsible Cobalt Initiative). The company must mention concrete outcomes being achieved.<br>\nDisclose the identity of their direct and indirect suppliers.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Disclosure_of_support_for_value_chain_traceability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435472,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Disclosure of goals, policies and strategies aligned with international biodiversity goals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Disclosure_of_goals_policies_and_strategies_aligned_with_international_biodiversity_goals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Disclosure of goals, policies and strategies aligned with international biodiversity goals",
      "question": "Does the company disclose goals, policies and strategies that align with international biodiversity goals?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services<br>\n(IPBES) Global Assessment has estimated that 1 million animal and plant species are threatened with<br>\nextinction. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) finds that more than a quarter<br>\nof all assessed species are threatened. There is thus an ever-growing need for companies to report<br>\nprogress on halting biodiversity loss, despite the challenges of measuring biodiversity impacts.Companies must:<br>\nDisclose goals, policies or strategies that align with international biodiversity goals and standards, and<br>\nProvide a rationale for how they contribute to achieving these frameworks’ goals or targets<br>\n<br>\nInternational goals and policies related to biodiversity include but are not limited to:<br>\n<br>\n**Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF)**: Aims to halt and reverse biodiversity loss globally by setting specific targets for conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. <em><strong>Note:</strong> The company may refer the GBF as the “Biodiversity Plan” </em><br>\n**Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)**: An international treaty focusing on conserving biological diversity, promoting sustainable use, and equitable sharing of genetic resources.<br>\nUN **Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)**: Include goals specifically addressing biodiversity under SDG 14 (Life Below Water) and SDG 15 (Life on Land).<br>\n**Recommendations by IPBES (e.g. Global Assessment)**: Provides an extensive evaluation by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, offering insight into past changes and future preservation strategies.<br>\n**Planetary Boundaries**: A framework outlining limits within which humanity can continue to develop and thrive for generations to come, emphasizing the safe operating space for nine critical earth system processes including biodiversity integrity.<br>\n**EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030**: Part of the European Green Deal, aiming to lead urgent action on biodiversity conservation in Europe, including setting up protected areas and restoring degraded ecosystems.<br>\n**Nature-positive **- A global societal goal defined as ‘Halt and Reverse Nature Loss by 2030 on a 2020 baseline and achieve full recovery by 2050’. In other words, ensuring more nature in the world in 2030 than in 2020 and continued recovery after that.<br>\n**Other National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)**: Developed by countries in accordance with the CBD, these plans include customized strategies to conserve and sustainably manage biodiversity.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Disclosure_of_goals_policies_and_strategies_aligned_with_international_biodiversity_goals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435484,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Target to halt and reverse biodiversity loss",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Target_to_halt_and_reverse_biodiversity_loss.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Target to halt and reverse biodiversity loss",
      "question": "Does the company set a target to halt and reverse biodiversity loss?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services<br>\n(IPBES) Global Assessment has estimated that 1 million animal and plant species are threatened with<br>\nextinction. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) finds that more than a quarter<br>\nof all assessed species are threatened. There is thus an ever-growing need for companies to report<br>\nprogress on halting biodiversity loss, despite the challenges of measuring biodiversity impacts.Companies must set a target to halt and reverse biodiversity loss, specifying one of the following: <br>\nA target to halt or reverse biodiversity loss<br>\nA target to restore or protect habitats<br>\nA target specific to species that are conserved or the status change in species conservation. These should be aligned with frameworks such as (i) Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, (ii) The Biodiversity Plan, (iii) Science-Based Target for Nature (SBTN), and (v) Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD)<br>\nHas a target specific to the number of ecological corridors established to connect fragmented habitats or crucial for species migration and genetic diversity <br>\nHas a target specific to area of habitat restored, protected, or enhanced, which it clearly and explicitly associates with biodiversity <br>\nHas a target specific to ecosystem services like amount of carbon sequestered or water purified, or soil stability improved, which it clearly and explicitly associates with biodiversity <br>\n<br>\nTargets must be: <br>\n1)Clearly biodiversity-related (or species-related) and linked to acceptable metrics (see metrics below), <strong>OR</strong>;<br>\n2)Outline specific commitments using acceptable formats (see accepted formats below), <strong>OR</strong>; <br>\n3)Use established biodiversity tools and frameworks to guide target setting<br>\n<br>\nMetrics that can be used for measuring biodiversity targets include but not limited to:<br>\n**Species-Specific Metrics**: Including the number of individuals of particular species that are conserved or the status changes in species conservation (e.g., moving from 'endangered' to 'vulnerable' on the IUCN Red List).<br>\n**Connectivity Metrics**: Such as the number of ecological corridors established to connect fragmented habitats, crucial for species migration and genetic diversity.<br>\n**Area-Based Metrics**: Such as hectares of habitat restored, protected, or enhanced. This is common for conservation projects focused on specific geographic areas. These metrics will only count towards this element when the target is clearly and explicitly biodiversity-related.<br>\n**Ecosystem Services Metrics**: Measures like the amount of carbon sequestered, water purified, or soil stability improved through ecosystem restoration or conservation efforts. These metrics will only count towards this element when the target is clearly and explicitly biodiversity-related.<br>\n<br>\nCompanies may refer to SBTN and TNFD biodiversity target-setting tools.<br>\n<br>\nFollowing guidance from SBTN, for biodiversity targets we may also accept targets with the following format: <br>\n\"By [target end date], [Company X] will cap (not increase) its sourcing of [species] from [stock name] compared to a [date] baseline.\"<br>\n\"[Company X] will engage in [initiative name] in [location] by [target start date] to reduce overexploitation in [stock name] by [target end date] as compared to [target start date] baseline.\"<br>\n\"By [target end date], [Company X] will reduce its sourcing of [species] from [stock name] by X% compared to a [date] baseline.\"<br>\n\"By [target end date], [Company name] will cease to source seafood with material impacts on [ETP marine wildlife] in [location].\"<br>\n\"By [target end date], [Company name] will reduce risk of negative impacts to [ETP marine wildlife] in [location] from [fishery operations].\"<br>\n\"[Company name] is engaged in [initiative name] in [location] to reduce risks to [ETP marine wildlife] by [target end date] as compared to a [target set date] baseline.\"<br>\n\"By [target end date], [Company name] will enact standards of best practice for [fisheries/aquaculture] at [fishery/farm location] to avoid impacts to [found habitats].\"<br>\n\"[Company name] is engaged in [initiative name] in [location] to achieve [stated goal relevant to habitat protection] by [target end date] as compared to a [target set date] baseline.\"",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Target_to_halt_and_reverse_biodiversity_loss+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435496,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting progress on halting and reversing biodiversity loss",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_progress_on_halting_and_reversing_biodiversity_loss.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting progress on halting and reversing biodiversity loss",
      "question": "Does the company report progress on halting and reversing biodiversity loss?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services<br>\n(IPBES) Global Assessment has estimated that 1 million animal and plant species are threatened with<br>\nextinction. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) finds that more than a quarter<br>\nof all assessed species are threatened. There is thus an ever-growing need for companies to report<br>\nprogress on halting biodiversity loss, despite the challenges of measuring biodiversity impacts.Companies must:<br>\n<br>\nReport quantitative progress on halting biodiversity loss, and<br>\nDisclose positive change(s) on at least one biodiversity-related metric since the last reporting period (or in its absence, a stated baseline).<br>\n<br>\nProgress can relate to: <br>\na)Species-specific metrics <br>\nb)Connectivity metrics<br>\nc)Area-based metrics<br>\nd)Ecosystem service metrics<br>\ne)Other biodiversity-related restoration metrics <br>\n<br>\nGiven that this topic is comparatively less mature than others, in this iteration of the Benchmark we will accept disclosure on specific projects (even if these do not cover the entirety of the company’s operations), as long as the methods used are robust and transparent.<br>\n<br>\nTo meet this element, at least two measurements are needed in order to demonstrate an improvement (e.g. a baseline and a subsequent measurement). Year on year metrics are not strictly mandatory as progress on biodiversity may take several years to be measurable. For example: <br>\n**Pollinator diversity** might be monitored every 2 to 3 years, balancing the need for timely data with the natural variability in populations. <br>\n**Species abundance** is typically evaluated every 3 to 5 years, allowing enough time to observe meaningful trends and the impact of conservation efforts. <br>\n**The connectivity of ecosystems** is generally assessed every 5 years to gauge long-term ecological landscape changes. <br>\n**Genetic diversity **within key species, reflecting complex and slow-changing dynamics, may require a longer interval, such as every 5 to 10 years.<br>\n**Invasive species coverage** can be monitored annually, as those metrics are crucial for tracking rapid changes and adjusting management strategies promptly. <br>\n<br>\nRestoration metrics will only count for this element when they are clearly biodiversity-related (e.g. to protect a species).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_progress_on_halting_and_reversing_biodiversity_loss+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435512,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Application of mitigation hierarchy or AR3T framework",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Application_of_mitigation_hierarchy_or_AR3T_framework.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Application of mitigation hierarchy or AR3T framework",
      "question": "Does the company apply the mitigation hierarchy or AR3T framework?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services<br>\n(IPBES) Global Assessment has estimated that 1 million animal and plant species are threatened with<br>\nextinction. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) finds that more than a quarter<br>\nof all assessed species are threatened. There is thus an ever-growing need for companies to report<br>\nprogress on halting biodiversity loss, despite the challenges of measuring biodiversity impacts.Companies must report on how it applies the mitigation hierarchy or “SBTN’s Action Framework: AR3T” at locations with potential impacts on nature. General statements that the mitigation hierarchy or AR3T framework was applied are insufficient to meet this element. Concrete information for how each step was followed is needed.<br>\n<br>\nThe **mitigation hierarchy** includes the following steps:<br>\n**Avoid **Impacts: Implement strategies to avoid impacts where possible. This might involve altering project designs, changing locations, or modifying operational practices.<br>\n**Minimize** Impacts: For impacts that cannot be avoided, develop and implement management measures to minimize their extent, duration, and severity. e.g. Preventing the spread of invasive alien species.<br>\n**Restore:** Where impacts occur, take actions to restore biodiversity through rehabilitation or restoration of habitats to their natural state.<br>\n**Offset**: As a last resort, compensate for any residual impacts by supporting biodiversity offsets that provide ecological benefits equivalent to those lost. Offset is not accepted for this element. <br>\n<br>\n**SBTN’s Action Framework: AR3T** includes the following steps:<br>\n**Avoid** impacts: Prevent impacts from happening in the first place or eliminate the impacts entirely.<br>\n**Reduce** impacts: Minimize impacts without necessarily eliminating them.<br>\n**Regenerate**: Take actions designed within existing land uses to increase the biophysical function and/or ecological productivity of an ecosystem or its components, often with a focus on a few specific ecosystem services or nature’s contributions to people<br>\n**Restore**: Initiate or accelerate the recovery of an ecosystem with respect to its health, integrity, and sustainability, with a focus on permanent changes in state<br>\n**Transform**: Take actions contributing to system-wide change, notably to alter the drivers of nature loss, e.g. through technological, economic, institutional, and social factors and changes in underlying values and behaviors",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Application_of_mitigation_hierarchy_or_AR3T_framework+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435524,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Nature transition plan aligned with Global Biodiversity Framework or nature-positive principles",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nature_transition_plan_aligned_with_Global_Biodiversity_Framework_or_nature_positive_principles.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Nature transition plan aligned with Global Biodiversity Framework or nature-positive principles",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a nature transition plan aligned with the Global Biodiversity Framework or nature-positive principles?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "While climate-related transition plans are becoming more prevalent in corporate agendas,<br>\nit is imperative for companies to also disclose nature-positive transition plans to address the<br>\ninterconnected challenges of climate change, environmental degradation and pollution. A holistic<br>\napproach that integrates these efforts is essential to effectively confront the environmental polycrisis<br>\nand ensure long-term sustainability. This must be achieved in a just manner that supports, rather than<br>\nharms, the most vulnerable stakeholders on the ground.Companies must have a biodiversity plan or a nature transition plan. A nature transition plan should function as both a strategic tool and a practical action plan, translating the organization's nature-related ambitions into specific goals, targets, and actions. It promotes accountability by clearly and transparently communicating the organization’s intentions in a way that can be monitored. It can be expected that the content of the nature transition plan addresses the company’s nature-related impacts, dependencies, risks and opportunities that were covered in indicators B01 and B02. The plan should:<br>\n<br>\n(i)Define clear objectives <br>\n(ii)Provide specific actions <br>\n(iii)Establish accountability <br>\n<br>\nThe goal of the nature transition plan should lay out how the company intends to contribute to the Global Biodiversity Framework’s (aka the Biodiversity Plan) goal to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030 and live in harmony with nature by 2050 (a goal referred to as “nature-positive”). However, it can also include references to other frameworks such as the planetary boundaries, NBSAPs, international treaties (e.g. Ramsar Convention, UN Convention to Combat Desertification), or regional policies (e.g. EU Green Deal).<br>\n<br>\nActions covered in the nature transition plan can include:<br>\nAvoiding and reducing negative impacts on nature<br>\nProtecting, conserving, regenerating and restoring nature<br>\nCreating positive impact drivers<br>\nUsing nature-based solutions (NBS)<br>\nDeveloping solutions and transforming underlying systems to address drivers of nature loss<br>\nCollaborating with stakeholders such as governments, Indigenous Peoples and local communities<br>\nBusiness model evaluation where necessary to avoid certain types of location-specific nature-related risks<br>\nContributions towards wider societal/economic transition<br>\n<br>\nSimply stating a vague long-term goal to become aligned with the GBF or with nature-positive without providing an implementation strategy, concrete steps to follow, interim milestones or KPIs is not sufficient.<br>\n<br>\nA comprehensive transition plan should include the same components of climate transition plans, as recommended by GFANZ and the Transition Planning Taskforce (TPT). However, at this stage this element can be met even if some of the aspects below are missing. At the very least there should be clarity that the company has established the** foundations** or **implementation strategy:**<br>\n1\\.**Foundations:** An articulation of the organisation’s overall approach to the nature transition, including specific objectives and high-level timelines. It should cover ambition, priorities, principles, scope, and impacts on the business model and value chains;<br>\n2\\.**Implementation strategy:** A strategy to align business activities, products, services and policies with the overall approach to the nature transition;<br>\n3\\.**Engagement strategy:** A strategy to engage with external stakeholders in support of the overall approach to the nature transition;<br>\n4\\.**Metrics and targets:** A suite of metrics and targets to assess and monitor progress towards the nature-related objectives; and<br>\n5\\.**Governance:** A set of structures to oversee, incentivise and support implementation of the plan.<br>\n<br>\nUseful resources for companies include:<br>\nTNFD (2024): [Discussion paper: Nature transition plans](https://tnfd.global/nature-transition-plans/)<br>\nGFANZ (2022) [Recommendations and Guidance on Financial Institution Net-zero Transition Plans](https://www.gfanzero.com/our-work/financial-institution-net-zero-transition-plans/); <br>\nGFANZ (2022) [Expectations for Real-economy Transition Plans](https://www.gfanzero.com/our-work/financial-institution-net-zero-transition-plans/#real-economy).<br>\nTPT (2023) [Disclosure Framework](https://transitiontaskforce.net/disclosure-framework/).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nature_transition_plan_aligned_with_Global_Biodiversity_Framework_or_nature_positive_principles+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435536,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Alignment or trade-offs between nature and climate transition plans",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Alignment_or_trade_offs_between_nature_and_climate_transition_plans.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Alignment or trade-offs between nature and climate transition plans",
      "question": "Does the company explain the alignment or tradeoffs between its nature and climate transition plans?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "While climate-related transition plans are becoming more prevalent in corporate agendas,<br>\nit is imperative for companies to also disclose nature-positive transition plans to address the<br>\ninterconnected challenges of climate change, environmental degradation and pollution. A holistic<br>\napproach that integrates these efforts is essential to effectively confront the environmental polycrisis<br>\nand ensure long-term sustainability. This must be achieved in a just manner that supports, rather than<br>\nharms, the most vulnerable stakeholders on the ground.This element can be met by a company without a nature transition plan as long as it explains how its nature-related plans or targets support, align, integrate or have trade-offs with its climate change targets.<br>\n<br>\nThe company must demonstrate an understanding of the synergies and trade-offs between tackling biodiversity loss and climate change. They must do one of the following:<br>\nDescribe Linkages: highlight how biodiversity-related targets support, align, integrate or have trade-offs with its climate change mitigation or pollution reduction targets <br>\nProvide evidence: share examples of integrated strategies that address the nexus of biodiversity loss and climate change, detailing how the achievement of one target supports progress in the others.<br>\n<br>\nAn integrated climate and nature transition plan may be most effective in enabling considerations of the links between the issues, including both synergies and trade-offs, however it is not necessary for this to be the case, and companies can still meet this element if they have separate climate and nature transition plans.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Alignment_or_trade_offs_between_nature_and_climate_transition_plans+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435552,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Addressing social impacts for a just nature-positive transition",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Addressing_social_impacts_for_a_just_nature_positive_transition.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Addressing social impacts for a just nature-positive transition",
      "question": "Does the company address its social impacts to ensure a just nature-positive transition?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "While climate-related transition plans are becoming more prevalent in corporate agendas,<br>\nit is imperative for companies to also disclose nature-positive transition plans to address the<br>\ninterconnected challenges of climate change, environmental degradation and pollution. A holistic<br>\napproach that integrates these efforts is essential to effectively confront the environmental polycrisis<br>\nand ensure long-term sustainability. This must be achieved in a just manner that supports, rather than<br>\nharms, the most vulnerable stakeholders on the ground.The company must show evidence of at least one of the following, in at least one location where the company operates: <br>\nDemonstrate how it addresses the impact of the nature transition on affected stakeholders’ social protection in the contexts in which it operates (e.g. provide job severance packages to workers who lose their jobs or create community funds to support the local economy).<br>\nOrganize stakeholder engagement processes to identify and respond to the impacts of a nature-positive transition. <br>\nBuild the resilience of communities affected by the nature-positive transition.<br>\nQuantifie the number of jobs created or destroyed and where. In instances where the number of jobs created are smaller than those destroyed, impact mitigating measures must also be described.<br>\nDemonstrate the measures it takes to create and provide or support access to green and decent jobs for workers and other affected stakeholders.<br>\nHas a public commitment (or describes measures it takes) to re- and/or up-skill workers displaced by the nature-positive transition.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Addressing_social_impacts_for_a_just_nature_positive_transition+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435564,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Results of collaboration to promote a nature-positive economy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Results_of_collaboration_to_promote_a_nature_positive_economy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Results of collaboration to promote a nature-positive economy",
      "question": "Does the company describe the results of collaborating with other actors on efforts to promote a nature-positive economy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "While climate-related transition plans are becoming more prevalent in corporate agendas,<br>\nit is imperative for companies to also disclose nature-positive transition plans to address the<br>\ninterconnected challenges of climate change, environmental degradation and pollution. A holistic<br>\napproach that integrates these efforts is essential to effectively confront the environmental polycrisis<br>\nand ensure long-term sustainability. This must be achieved in a just manner that supports, rather than<br>\nharms, the most vulnerable stakeholders on the ground.The company must describe concrete outcomes from efforts it is engaging in with other actors (e.g. other companies, civil society organizations, cities) to work towards a nature-positive economy. The element can be met if the company does one of the following:<br>\n<br>\nDemonstrates results from collaboration, for example aature-positive impacts associated with joint advocacy or lobbying efforts<br>\nDemonstrating clear agreements or measurable outcomes achieved in collaboration with peers or municipalities <br>\nProvides evidence of knowledge sharing, for example creating guidance documents or shared frameworks to drive industry-wide change <br>\nHighlights measurable impacts, including metrics or data showing tangible results or joint efforts<br>\n<br>\nPositive nature-related outcomes associated to joint advocacy or lobbying<br>\nSpecific pro-environmental agreements (e.g. joint water agreements) that have been reached with peers<br>\nSupporting the uptake of environmental standards by less advanced peers<br>\nJoint development of knowledge products used to advance environmental goals<br>\nOutcomes of collaborations with municipalities (e.g. specific amount of waste reduction after the end of life of a product)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Results_of_collaboration_to_promote_a_nature_positive_economy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435576,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting on greenhouse gas emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_greenhouse_gas_emissions.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting on greenhouse gas emissions",
      "question": "Does the company report on its greenhouse gas emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Biodiversity and climate change are heavily interlinked (CBD, 2009), with conversion and<br>\ndegradation of ecosystems leading to increases in GHG emissions. Subsequently, the effects of<br>\nclimate change are driving further biodiversity loss through increased risk of extinctions and extreme<br>\nweather events. This indicator focuses on companies’ emissions reductions in line with a 1.5°C<br>\ntrajectory as recommended by the Paris Agreement. The indicator is also aligned with the interim<br>\ntarget of the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) to reduce value chain GHG emissions by 50% by<br>\n2030 and by 90-95% by 2050, in accordance with sectoral ambitions for 2030. This element will be BASIC if:<br>\n  \\- ALL of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n    \\- Valid Accounting<br>\n    \\- Disclosure Level is in Basic,Relevant,Full<br>\nAdditional conditions to be STANDARD:<br>\n  \\- Disclosure Level is in Relevant,Full<br>\nAdditional conditions to be ADVANCED:<br>\n  \\- Disclosure Level = Full<br>\nAdditional conditions to be NEXT PRACTICE:<br>\n  \\- Valid Methodology = Yes<br>\nAdditional conditions to be LOW-CARBON ALIGNED:<br>\n  \\- Independently verified is in Tags",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_greenhouse_gas_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435588,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Targets_to_reduce_greenhouse_gas_emissions.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions",
      "question": "Does the company set targets to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Biodiversity and climate change are heavily interlinked (CBD, 2009), with conversion and<br>\ndegradation of ecosystems leading to increases in GHG emissions. Subsequently, the effects of<br>\nclimate change are driving further biodiversity loss through increased risk of extinctions and extreme<br>\nweather events. This indicator focuses on companies’ emissions reductions in line with a 1.5°C<br>\ntrajectory as recommended by the Paris Agreement. The indicator is also aligned with the interim<br>\ntarget of the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) to reduce value chain GHG emissions by 50% by<br>\n2030 and by 90-95% by 2050, in accordance with sectoral ambitions for 2030. This element will be BASIC if:<br>\n  \\- Valid Targets >= 1<br>\nAdditional conditions to be STANDARD:<br>\n  \\- ALL of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n    \\- Number of S1+2 valid targets >= 1<br>\n    \\- ANY of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n      \\- The following statement should not be true:<br>\n        \\- Significant S3 Emissions<br>\n      \\- Number of S3 valid targets >= 1<br>\nAdditional conditions to be ADVANCED:<br>\n  \\- If:<br>\n    \\- Significant S3 Emissions<br>\n  \\- Then:<br>\n    \\- Valid Targets >= 4<br>\n  \\- Else:<br>\n    \\- Number of S1+2 valid targets >= 2<br>\nAdditional conditions to be NEXT PRACTICE:<br>\n  \\- Valid Targets >= 4<br>\nAdditional conditions to be LOW-CARBON ALIGNED:<br>\n  \\- ALL of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n    \\- Number of S1+2 SBTi validated targets >= 2<br>\n    \\- ANY of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n      \\- The following statement should not be true:<br>\n        \\- Significant S3 Emissions<br>\n      \\- Number of S3 SBTi validated targets >= 2",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Targets_to_reduce_greenhouse_gas_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435604,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting progress on reducing greenhouse gas emissions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_progress_on_reducing_greenhouse_gas_emissions.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting progress on reducing greenhouse gas emissions",
      "question": "Does the company report progress on reducing its greenhouse gas emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Biodiversity and climate change are heavily interlinked (CBD, 2009), with conversion and<br>\ndegradation of ecosystems leading to increases in GHG emissions. Subsequently, the effects of<br>\nclimate change are driving further biodiversity loss through increased risk of extinctions and extreme<br>\nweather events. This indicator focuses on companies’ emissions reductions in line with a 1.5°C<br>\ntrajectory as recommended by the Paris Agreement. The indicator is also aligned with the interim<br>\ntarget of the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) to reduce value chain GHG emissions by 50% by<br>\n2030 and by 90-95% by 2050, in accordance with sectoral ambitions for 2030. Companies are expected to disclose GHG emissions across relevant scopes and emissions categories, considering the sectoral context in which the company operates and its activity profile.The following conditions must be evaluated in order to properly score this element:<br>\n- GHG emissions from companies are reported at least on an annual basis.<br>\n- The company describes how its GHG emissions were calculated. o for real economy companies, the company mentions the GHG accounting standards it used, e.g. ISO 14064-1 or GHG Protocol. o financial institutions outline the methodology for calculating scopes 1, 2, and 3 emissions (including financed GHG emissions) and total footprint. This should include<br>\n- The company discloses its operational GHG emissions (scopes 1 and 2) as separate categories.<br>\n- The company specifies whether its reported scope 2 emissions are location-based and/or market-based. Companies belonging to electricity-intensive sectors shall report location-based scope 2 emissions and may also report market-based emissions. Companies in these sectors shall also report scope 3 category 3 emissions, which are associated with their electricity use.<br>\n- The company discloses its value chain (scope 3) emissions per category for all relevant scope 3 categories\\* and provides a relevant rationale for any excluded category. The relevance is identified in terms of the GHG emissions categories that most contribute to the overall profile of total GHG emissions in which the company sits.<br>\n- For sectors for which non-CO2 emissions are significant, the company must report the CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) for all relevant GHG emissions.<br>\n- The company has its GHG inventory independently certified.<br>\n- Avoided emissions and carbon credits should be reported separately.**Attributes required**: Full emissions inventory, methodology for calculating emissions, andindependent verification of emissions disclosure.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_progress_on_reducing_greenhouse_gas_emissions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435616,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sectoral pathways for target-setting compatible with a 1.5°C scenario",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sectoral_pathways_for_target_setting_compatible_with_a_1_5_C_scenario.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sectoral pathways for target-setting compatible with a 1.5°C scenario",
      "question": "Are sectoral pathways used for target-setting compatible with a 1.5 °C scenario?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Biodiversity and climate change are heavily interlinked (CBD, 2009), with conversion and<br>\ndegradation of ecosystems leading to increases in GHG emissions. Subsequently, the effects of<br>\nclimate change are driving further biodiversity loss through increased risk of extinctions and extreme<br>\nweather events. This indicator focuses on companies’ emissions reductions in line with a 1.5°C<br>\ntrajectory as recommended by the Paris Agreement. The indicator is also aligned with the interim<br>\ntarget of the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) to reduce value chain GHG emissions by 50% by<br>\n2030 and by 90-95% by 2050, in accordance with sectoral ambitions for 2030. This element will be MET if:<br>\n  \\- If:<br>\n    \\- Scoring Class is Financial sector<br>\n  \\- Then:<br>\n    \\- ANY of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n      \\- GMC\\_01889 is in 1.5∞C,Well-below 2∞C,2∞C,NA<br>\n      \\- GMC\\_01894 is in 1.5∞C,Well-below 2∞C,2∞C,NA<br>\n      \\- unspecified is in GMC\\_01898<br>\n      \\- unspecified is in GMC\\_01899<br>\n  \\- Else:<br>\n    \\- ALL of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n      \\- ANY of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n        \\- GMC\\_01879 = 1.5∞C<br>\n        \\- GMC\\_01884 = 1.5∞C<br>\n        \\- Scope 1+2 is in GMC\\_01898<br>\n        \\- Scope 1+2 is in GMC\\_01899<br>\n      \\- ANY of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n        \\- Significant S3 Emissions = false<br>\n        \\- GMC\\_01889 is in 1.5∞C,Well-below 2∞C,2∞C,NA<br>\n        \\- GMC\\_01894 is in 1.5∞C,Well-below 2∞C,2∞C,NA<br>\n        \\- Scope 3 is in GMC\\_01898<br>\n        \\- Scope 3 is in GMC\\_01899<br>\n<br>\nGMC descriptions:<br>\n \\- GMC\\_01884: S1+2 long-term target SBTi temperature classification<br>\n \\- GMC\\_01889: S3 near-term target SBTi temperature classification<br>\n \\- GMC\\_01899: 1.5∞C pathway reference from credible institutions<br>\n \\- GMC\\_01894: S3 long-term target SBTi temperature classification<br>\n \\- GMC\\_01898: 1.5∞C pathway reference from SBTi Net-Zero standard or ISO Net-zero guidelines<br>\n \\- GMC\\_01879: S1+2 near-term target SBTi temperature classification",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sectoral_pathways_for_target_setting_compatible_with_a_1_5_C_scenario+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435628,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting on air pollutants",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_air_pollutants.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting on air pollutants",
      "question": "Does the company report on its air pollutants?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The production of air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides and sulphur oxides, through<br>\ncompanies’ operations and business activities has adverse effects on agriculture, air quality,<br>\nbiodiversity, climate, habitats and the health of both animals and humans (GRI, 2021). This indicator<br>\nmeasures companies’ approaches to measuring and reducing harmful air pollutants across their value<br>\nchains. The company must disclose NOx and SOx to meet this element. Emissions must be disclosed using absolute values.<br>\n<br>\nOther common air pollutants that companies could report on include: <br>\n<br>\nPersistent organic pollutants (POP) <br>\nVolatile organic compounds (VOC) <br>\nHazardous air pollutants (HAP) <br>\nParticulate matter (PM).<br>\n<br>\nAdditionally, companies from the following industries must disclose at least one additional pollutant: <br>\n<br>\nChemicals (e.g. HAP)<br>\nConstruction materials (e.g. PM, VOC, dioxins, heavy metals)<br>\nContainers and packaging (e.g. PM)<br>\nCruise lines (e.g. PM)<br>\nElectric utilities and power generators (e.g. PM, lead and mercury)<br>\nFreight (e.g. PM)<br>\nIron & Steel Producers (e.g. PM, VOC, lead, carbon monoxide and manganese)<br>\nMarine transportation (e.g. PM)<br>\nMetals and mining (e.g. PM, lead, mercury, cadmium, arsenic)<br>\nOil & gas (e.g. VOC)<br>\nPulp & Paper Products (e.g. PM)<br>\nRoad transportation (e.g. PM)<br>\n<br>\nReporting must cover the company's entire operations. Datapoint must be from the most recent reporting period. Intensity metrics are not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_air_pollutants+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435644,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Targets to reduce air pollutants",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Targets_to_reduce_air_pollutants.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Targets to reduce air pollutants",
      "question": "Does the company set a target to reduce its air pollutants?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The production of air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides and sulphur oxides, through<br>\ncompanies’ operations and business activities has adverse effects on agriculture, air quality,<br>\nbiodiversity, climate, habitats and the health of both animals and humans (GRI, 2021). This indicator<br>\nmeasures companies’ approaches to measuring and reducing harmful air pollutants across their value<br>\nchains. To meet this element, the company must disclose at least one target to reduce the absolute emission reduction of one of its most materialair pollutants for all of the company‚Äôs operations.<br>\n<br>\nTargets that are applied to a one-off or isolated project are only accepted if the company provides explicit reasoning and evidence that location/project specific targets are more impactful. E.g. Pollutant X in Location Y is particularly harmful or close to communities and must be targeted at that location specifically.<br>\n<br>\nIf the company states that they have already reached optimal levels of air pollutants, or levels that are consistent with best practice, they will meet this element as long as their standards are clearly stated and widely recognized (for example, in accordance with WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines).<br>\n<br>\nTargets must be timebound, with a defined baseline value and year, and include clear, quantitative, and measurable metrics. They should focus on short-term progress up to 2030, with any longer-term goals broken down into interim targets no more than five years apart. Intensity targets are generally not accepted, as they do not ensure absolute improvements. Year-on-year targets and qualitative targets may be accepted on a case-by-case basis, depending on their ambition and measurability. Any changes to targets or their underlying assumptions must be explained, particularly in terms of impact on comparability. Additionally, targets aimed solely at maintaining current performance are not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Targets_to_reduce_air_pollutants+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435656,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting progress on reducing air pollutants",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_progress_on_reducing_air_pollutants.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting progress on reducing air pollutants",
      "question": "Does the company report progress on reducing its air pollutants?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The production of air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides and sulphur oxides, through<br>\ncompanies’ operations and business activities has adverse effects on agriculture, air quality,<br>\nbiodiversity, climate, habitats and the health of both animals and humans (GRI, 2021). This indicator<br>\nmeasures companies’ approaches to measuring and reducing harmful air pollutants across their value<br>\nchains. The company must either:<br>\nreport reduction progress against its targets in element (b). Progress must be reported using absolute values. Progress against a target is only accepted if the target is timebound and measurable as specified by the requirements in element (b), or<br>\nShow year-on-year, absolute reductions for all material pollutants for three consecutive years. If the company reports data on multiple air pollutants, but are only improving in one, the element is only Met if it is NOT regressing in another.<br>\n<br>\nProject or location specific progress is only accepted if the company provides explicit reasoning and evidence that this is more impactful to the specific location",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_progress_on_reducing_air_pollutants+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435668,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Identification of societal impacts in air pollution risk assessment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Identification_of_societal_impacts_in_air_pollution_risk_assessment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Identification of societal impacts in air pollution risk assessment",
      "question": "Does the company identify societal impacts in its air pollution risk assessment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The production of air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides and sulphur oxides, through<br>\ncompanies’ operations and business activities has adverse effects on agriculture, air quality,<br>\nbiodiversity, climate, habitats and the health of both animals and humans (GRI, 2021). This indicator<br>\nmeasures companies’ approaches to measuring and reducing harmful air pollutants across their value<br>\nchains. This element can be met either by:<br>\nhaving a policy stating that the company has conducted social impact assessments associated its air pollution risks across substantial operations, or <br>\nproviding a high-level summary of a social risk or impact assessment for its most material operations or value chain impacts.<br>\n<br>\nEvidence of having conducted a risk or impact assessment for their most material sites can include:<br>\ndisclosing the actual or potential negative impact on air quality associated with its operations, products or services, contractual or business relationships, or value chain. <br>\ndisclosing tools, approaches, or external standards followed to conduct the self-assessment, or external audits or inspections they engage in.<br>\ndisclosing affected stakeholders (customers, local communities, tenants, etc.)<br>\ndisclosing frequency, timing, or factors that trigger the company to conduct risk assessments (or reassessment) on air pollution (e.g. proposed business activity, in response to or in anticipation of changes in the operating environment, periodically throughout the life of an activity or relationship, etc.)<br>\n<br>\nCompanies may refer to the following as evidence of having conducted a risk assessment:<br>\nthe first two steps of the SBTN guidance, or equivalent (ie. Assessment/Prioritization).<br>\nFERA: [Air: Fate, Exposure, and Risk Analysis (FERA) | US EPA](https://www.epa.gov/fera)<br>\nAir Quality Health Index<br>\nHealth impact assessments (HIA)<br>\nExamples of impacts to society that the company can measure include impacts to:<br>\nhuman health<br>\nthe wellbeing of local communities<br>\nmarginalized populations, such as Indigenous Peoples <br>\naccess to land or areas<br>\n<br>\nThis is unmet if:<br>\nCompany assessments are ongoing, or will be conducted in the future<br>\nThe risk assessment does not specifically disclose risks to society",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Identification_of_societal_impacts_in_air_pollution_risk_assessment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435680,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting on water use",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_water_use.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting on water use",
      "question": "Does the company report on its water use?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "According to the United Nations, nearly two-thirds of the global population experiences<br>\nsevere water scarcity for at least one month a year, and over two billion people live in countries with<br>\ninadequate water supply. By 2025, half of the world’s population could face water scarcity, and by<br>\n2040, one in four children may live in areas with extreme water stress. Global water use has increased<br>\nsix times over the past century, primarily through agriculture (around 70%) and industrial activities<br>\n(around 20%), according to the United Nations World Water Development Report 2020. This<br>\nunderscores the significant role companies play in water consumption and the need for sustainable<br>\nand transparent water management practices.The company must report the following metrics on the company‚Äôs entire operations:<br>\nWater withdrawal<br>\nWater consumption<br>\nWater withdrawal and consumption from water-stressed areas, at least from areas with high water stress and above<br>\n<br>\nWater-stressed areas must be identified following a recognized tool or methodology (e.g., the WRI Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas).<br>\nDatapoint must be from the most recent reporting period. Intensity metrics are not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_water_use+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435696,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Targets to reduce water use",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Targets_to_reduce_water_use.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Targets to reduce water use",
      "question": "Does the company set a target to reduce its water use?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "According to the United Nations, nearly two-thirds of the global population experiences<br>\nsevere water scarcity for at least one month a year, and over two billion people live in countries with<br>\ninadequate water supply. By 2025, half of the world’s population could face water scarcity, and by<br>\n2040, one in four children may live in areas with extreme water stress. Global water use has increased<br>\nsix times over the past century, primarily through agriculture (around 70%) and industrial activities<br>\n(around 20%), according to the United Nations World Water Development Report 2020. This<br>\nunderscores the significant role companies play in water consumption and the need for sustainable<br>\nand transparent water management practices.The company must set a target on its water withdrawal <strong>OR</strong> water consumption that covers at least its own operations (including aggregated targets, e.g. reducing total net water consumption). If the target covers only a subset of the company‚Äôs operations or value chain (e.g. a specific water basin; specific water-stressed areas), it should be methodologically justified.<br>\n<br>\nFor a list of methodologies the companies could use, refer to element (d).<br>\n<br>\nTargets must be timebound, with a defined baseline value and year, and include clear, quantitative, and measurable metrics. They should focus on short-term progress up to 2030, with any longer-term goals broken down into interim targets no more than five years apart. Intensity targets are not accepted, as they do not ensure absolute improvements. Year-on-year targets and qualitative targets may be accepted on a case-by-case basis, depending on their ambition and measurability. Any changes to targets or their underlying assumptions must be explained, particularly in terms of impact on comparability. Additionally, targets aimed solely at maintaining current performance are not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Targets_to_reduce_water_use+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435708,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting progress on reducing water use",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_progress_on_reducing_water_use.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting progress on reducing water use",
      "question": "Does the company report progress on reducing its water use?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "According to the United Nations, nearly two-thirds of the global population experiences<br>\nsevere water scarcity for at least one month a year, and over two billion people live in countries with<br>\ninadequate water supply. By 2025, half of the world’s population could face water scarcity, and by<br>\n2040, one in four children may live in areas with extreme water stress. Global water use has increased<br>\nsix times over the past century, primarily through agriculture (around 70%) and industrial activities<br>\n(around 20%), according to the United Nations World Water Development Report 2020. This<br>\nunderscores the significant role companies play in water consumption and the need for sustainable<br>\nand transparent water management practices.The company must report on both withdrawal and consumption for its entire operations. It must report year-on-year, absolute reductions for three consecutive years on one of the two. If the company reports data on withdrawal and consumption, but is only improving in one, the element is only Met if it is not worsening in the other.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_progress_on_reducing_water_use+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435724,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Site-level water risk assessment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Site_level_water_risk_assessment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Site-level water risk assessment",
      "question": "Does the company assess water risk at site level?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "According to the United Nations, nearly two-thirds of the global population experiences<br>\nsevere water scarcity for at least one month a year, and over two billion people live in countries with<br>\ninadequate water supply. By 2025, half of the world’s population could face water scarcity, and by<br>\n2040, one in four children may live in areas with extreme water stress. Global water use has increased<br>\nsix times over the past century, primarily through agriculture (around 70%) and industrial activities<br>\n(around 20%), according to the United Nations World Water Development Report 2020. This<br>\nunderscores the significant role companies play in water consumption and the need for sustainable<br>\nand transparent water management practices.Companies must show evidence of having conducted assessments of water risks at the site level, following established methodological guidance, and report quantitative data at the site or basin level.<br>\n<br>\nIn the best case scenario, companies should show evidence of setting local, context-specific targets at each water basin they operate in that take into account the context-specific properties of each site. <br>\n<br>\nExamples of guidance companies could use include:<br>\nSBTN Freshwater Guidance<br>\nCEO Water Mandate Guidance<br>\nAWS Standard 2.0 Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThis is unmet if company assessments are ongoing, or will be conducted in the future.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Site_level_water_risk_assessment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435736,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting on water pollutants",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_water_pollutants.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting on water pollutants",
      "question": "Does the company report on its water pollutants?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Approximately 80% of global wastewater is untreated when released back into the<br>\nenvironment, causing significant negative effects on both ecosystem functioning and human health<br>\n(IUCN, 2017). Water pollution not only degrades freshwater sources, contributing to the global water<br>\ncrisis, but also threatens biodiversity. As industrial activities are a major contributor to water pollution,<br>\ncompanies have a responsibility to implement more effective and transparent wastewater treatment<br>\nand pollution control measures.The company must report data on its discharge of water pollutants. Examples of water pollutants that companies could report on include: <br>\nBiochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)<br>\nChemical Oxygen Demand (COD)<br>\nTotal Suspended Solids (TSS)<br>\nheavy metals (e.g. mercury, lead, zinc)<br>\nVolatile Organic Chemicals (VOCs) (e.g. solvents, pesticides, synthetics)<br>\nPhosphorus<br>\nNitrogen<br>\nPesticides<br>\n<br>\nReporting must cover the company’s entire operations. Datapoint must be from the most recent reporting period. Intensity metrics are not accepted",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_water_pollutants+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435748,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Targets to reduce water pollutants",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Targets_to_reduce_water_pollutants.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Targets to reduce water pollutants",
      "question": "Does the company set a target to reduce its water pollutants?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Approximately 80% of global wastewater is untreated when released back into the<br>\nenvironment, causing significant negative effects on both ecosystem functioning and human health<br>\n(IUCN, 2017). Water pollution not only degrades freshwater sources, contributing to the global water<br>\ncrisis, but also threatens biodiversity. As industrial activities are a major contributor to water pollution,<br>\ncompanies have a responsibility to implement more effective and transparent wastewater treatment<br>\nand pollution control measures.The company must have a quantitative target to reduce its water pollutantsor at least one of its most material pollutants.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Targets_to_reduce_water_pollutants+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435764,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting progress on reducing water pollutants",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_progress_on_reducing_water_pollutants.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting progress on reducing water pollutants",
      "question": "Does the company report progress on reducing its water pollutants?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Approximately 80% of global wastewater is untreated when released back into the<br>\nenvironment, causing significant negative effects on both ecosystem functioning and human health<br>\n(IUCN, 2017). Water pollution not only degrades freshwater sources, contributing to the global water<br>\ncrisis, but also threatens biodiversity. As industrial activities are a major contributor to water pollution,<br>\ncompanies have a responsibility to implement more effective and transparent wastewater treatment<br>\nand pollution control measures.The company must either report progress against targets or show absolute, year-on-year reductions for three consecutive years for all pollutants disclosed in element (a). Any increases in any pollutants would be Unmet.<br>\n<br>\nProgress against a target is only accepted if the target is timebound and measurable as specified in the requirements in element (b).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_progress_on_reducing_water_pollutants+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435776,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Identification of societal impacts in water pollution risk assessment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Identification_of_societal_impacts_in_water_pollution_risk_assessment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Identification of societal impacts in water pollution risk assessment",
      "question": "Does the company identify societal impacts in its water pollution risk assessment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Approximately 80% of global wastewater is untreated when released back into the<br>\nenvironment, causing significant negative effects on both ecosystem functioning and human health<br>\n(IUCN, 2017). Water pollution not only degrades freshwater sources, contributing to the global water<br>\ncrisis, but also threatens biodiversity. As industrial activities are a major contributor to water pollution,<br>\ncompanies have a responsibility to implement more effective and transparent wastewater treatment<br>\nand pollution control measures.The company must either: <br>\nHave a policy stating that the company has conducted social impact assessments associated with its water use or pollution risks across substantial operations, or<br>\nProvide at least a high-level summary of a social risk or impact assessment for its most material operations or value chain impacts.<br>\n<br>\nEvidence of having conducted a risk or impact assessment for their most material sites can include:<br>\ndisclosing the actual or potential negative impacts stemming from its water use or pollution associated with its operations, products or services, contractual or business relationships, or value chain. <br>\ndisclosing tools, approaches, or external standards followed to conduct the self-assessment, or external audits or inspections they engage in.<br>\ndisclosing affected stakeholders (customers, local communities, tenants, etc.)<br>\ndisclosing frequency, timing, or factors that trigger the company to conduct risk assessments (or reassessment) on water use or pollution (e.g. proposed business activity, in response to or in anticipation of changes in the operating environment, periodically throughout the life of an activity or relationship, etc.)<br>\nExamples of impacts to society that the company can measure include impacts to:<br>\n<br>\nhuman health<br>\nthe wellbeing of local communities<br>\nmarginalized populations, such as Indigenous Peoples <br>\naccess to land or areas<br>\n<br>\nThis is unmet if the company:<br>\nconducts a risk assessment that does not disclose specifically the risks to society<br>\ndiscloses an ongoing assessment, or that one will be conducted in the future",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Identification_of_societal_impacts_in_water_pollution_risk_assessment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435788,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting on material inputs",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_material_inputs.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting on material inputs",
      "question": "Does the company report on its material inputs?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The global reliance on a linear economy is a major driver of environmental degradation,<br>\nwith the extraction and processing of materials, fuels and food responsible for 90% of biodiversity loss<br>\n(UNEP, 2019). At the same time, global material consumption continues to climb: in the last six years<br>\nalone, we have consumed over half a trillion tonnes of materials Рnearly matching the total material<br>\nuse throughout the whole of the 20th century (Circularity Gap Report, 2023). This unsustainable<br>\npattern underscores the urgent need for companies to adopt more responsible and transparent<br>\nresource use practices.The company must disclose both:<br>\nTotal weight/volume of input materials across operations<br>\nDisaggregated breakdown of input materials<br>\n<br>\nThe total can be calculated from the disaggregated breakdown, but it should be clear that the disclosed information comprises all of its input materials. Note that while water is defined as an input material by GRI 301, it can be omitted from input materials here, as they is assessed separately by indicator B8.<br>\n<br>\nAdditionally, the disaggregated breakdown should ideally be separated clearly into renewable and non-renewable, but the element can be met as long as the breakdown is sufficient to allow the reader to separate the inputs into renewable and non-renewable.<br>\n<br>\nThis is unmet if:<br>\nThe metrics are disclosed in aggregate, without breakdown of materials into categories<br>\nThe metrics are disclosed only for particular segments of the operations (eg. Packaging only) or limited locations.<br>\n<br>\nReporting must cover the company’s entire operations. Datapoint must be from the most recent reporting period. Intensity metrics are not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_material_inputs+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435804,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Targets to improve material input use",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Targets_to_improve_material_input_use.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Targets to improve material input use",
      "question": "Does the company set a target to improve its material input use?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The global reliance on a linear economy is a major driver of environmental degradation,<br>\nwith the extraction and processing of materials, fuels and food responsible for 90% of biodiversity loss<br>\n(UNEP, 2019). At the same time, global material consumption continues to climb: in the last six years<br>\nalone, we have consumed over half a trillion tonnes of materials – nearly matching the total material<br>\nuse throughout the whole of the 20th century (Circularity Gap Report, 2023). This unsustainable<br>\npattern underscores the urgent need for companies to adopt more responsible and transparent<br>\nresource use practices.Companies must set a target improve its material input that covers the whole operation. Eligible targets can include:<br>\nDecreasing total weight of non-renewable input materials<br>\nIncreasing % of renewable materials<br>\nIncreasing % of reused/recycled products <br>\n<br>\nThis is unmet if the target only applies to specific product lines or for specific parts of the operation.<br>\n<br>\nTargets must be timebound, with a defined baseline value and year, and include clear, quantitative, and measurable metrics. They should focus on short-term progress up to 2030, with any longer-term goals broken down into interim targets no more than five years apart. Intensity targets are generally not accepted unless stated otherwise, as they do not ensure absolute improvements. Year-on-year targets and qualitative targets may be accepted on a case-by-case basis, depending on their ambition and measurability. Any changes to targets or their underlying assumptions must be explained, particularly in terms of impact on comparability. Additionally, targets limited to isolated projects or aimed solely at maintaining current performance are not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Targets_to_improve_material_input_use+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435816,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting progress on improving material input use",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_progress_on_improving_material_input_use.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting progress on improving material input use",
      "question": "Does the company report progress on improving its material input use?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The global reliance on a linear economy is a major driver of environmental degradation,<br>\nwith the extraction and processing of materials, fuels and food responsible for 90% of biodiversity loss<br>\n(UNEP, 2019). At the same time, global material consumption continues to climb: in the last six years<br>\nalone, we have consumed over half a trillion tonnes of materials – nearly matching the total material<br>\nuse throughout the whole of the 20th century (Circularity Gap Report, 2023). This unsustainable<br>\npattern underscores the urgent need for companies to adopt more responsible and transparent<br>\nresource use practices.The company must demonstrate progress towards its material input use target or show absolute, year-on-year reductions for three consecutive years in the total weight of its material inputs.<br>\n<br>\nProgress against a target is only accepted if the target is timebound and measurable as specified by the requirements in element (b).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_progress_on_improving_material_input_use+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435828,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting on recycled or reclaimed input materials",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_recycled_or_reclaimed_input_materials.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting on recycled or reclaimed input materials",
      "question": "Does the company report its recycled/reclaimed input materials?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The global reliance on a linear economy is a major driver of environmental degradation,<br>\nwith the extraction and processing of materials, fuels and food responsible for 90% of biodiversity loss<br>\n(UNEP, 2019). At the same time, global material consumption continues to climb: in the last six years<br>\nalone, we have consumed over half a trillion tonnes of materials Рnearly matching the total material<br>\nuse throughout the whole of the 20th century (Circularity Gap Report, 2023). This unsustainable<br>\npattern underscores the urgent need for companies to adopt more responsible and transparent<br>\nresource use practices.In addition to the metrics disclosed in element (a), the company must disclose the percentage of recycled or reclaimed material input, covering the company’s entire operations. <br>\n<br>\nAs we assess plastics separately in indicator 11, this is unmet if the disclosure only mentions plastics, to avoid double-counting.<br>\n<br>\nDatapoint must be from the most recent reporting period. Intensity metrics are not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_recycled_or_reclaimed_input_materials+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435844,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting on plastic use",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_plastic_use.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting on plastic use",
      "question": "Does the company report on its plastic use?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Since the 1980s, plastic pollution has increased tenfold (IPBES, 2018). Projections indicate<br>\nthat global plastic production will double by 2050, with approximately 8 million tonnes entering<br>\nmarine environments annually (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). Notably,<br>\naround 50% of all plastic produced is designed for single-use purposes, contributing significantly to<br>\nthis escalating issue. There is an urgent need for companies to adopt and disclose comprehensive<br>\nplastic management strategies to reduce their plastic use.The company must report on:<br>\nTotal weight of plastic usage, and<br>\n% of renewable or recycled plastic, such as: the % of virgin fossil-based content, the % of renewable content (from renewable biological sources), or the % of recycled content.<br>\nAdditionally, companies that produce plastics must also report on plastic production. <br>\n<br>\nIf the company does not report on its total weight of plastic used, it must at the very least report on the most material uses of plastic. If the company is not explicit about what its most material uses of plastic are, use the attached table for reference.<br>\n<br>\nThe company must report on categories classified as Moderate **and** High materiality for the industry, based on the [CDP Plastics Sector Guidance](https://cdn.cdp.net/cdp-production/comfy/cms/files/files/000/009/314/original/CDP_Plastics_sector_relevance_2024.pdf).<br>\n<br>\nIn the case of industries for which both categories are classified of Low materiality, they must report on either of them. If a company does not report on plastic use but explicitly states it does not use plastic in their products or packaging, they may get a Met for this element. This will be analysed on a case-by-case basis.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_plastic_use+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435856,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Targets to reduce plastic use",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Targets_to_reduce_plastic_use.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Targets to reduce plastic use",
      "question": "Does the company set a target to reduce its plastic use?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Since the 1980s, plastic pollution has increased tenfold (IPBES, 2018). Projections indicate<br>\nthat global plastic production will double by 2050, with approximately 8 million tonnes entering<br>\nmarine environments annually (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). Notably,<br>\naround 50% of all plastic produced is designed for single-use purposes, contributing significantly to<br>\nthis escalating issue. There is an urgent need for companies to adopt and disclose comprehensive<br>\nplastic management strategies to reduce their plastic use.Eligible targets companies could set include:<br>\nReduce the total weight of virgin content in plastic polymers produced and/or sold<br>\nIncrease the proportion of post-consumer recycled content in plastic polymers produced and/or sold<br>\nReduce the total weight of plastic packaging used and/or produced<br>\nEliminate single-use plastic packaging<br>\nReduce the total weight of virgin content in plastic packaging<br>\nIncrease the proportion of post-consumer recycled content in plastic packaging<br>\nIncrease the proportion of plastic packaging that is recyclable/reusable in practice and at scale<br>\nEliminate single-use plastic products<br>\nReduce the total weight of plastics or of virgin content in goods/products<br>\nIncrease the proportion of plastic goods/products which are recyclable/reusable in practice and at scale<br>\nIncrease the proportion of post-consumer recycled content in plastic goods/products<br>\n<br>\nTargets must be timebound, with a defined baseline value and year, and include clear, quantitative, and measurable metrics. They should focus on short-term progress up to 2030, with any longer-term goals broken down into interim targets no more than five years apart. Intensity targets are not accepted unless stated otherwise, as they do not ensure absolute improvements. Year-on-year targets and qualitative targets may be accepted on a case-by-case basis, depending on their ambition and measurability. Any changes to targets or their underlying assumptions must be explained, particularly in terms of impact on comparability. Additionally, targets aimed solely at maintaining current performance are not accepted.<br>\n<br>\nThis is unmet if:<br>\nTargets are for a subset of products<br>\nTargets increase the % of biodegradeable and compostable plastics",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Targets_to_reduce_plastic_use+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435868,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting progress on reducing plastic use",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_progress_on_reducing_plastic_use.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting progress on reducing plastic use",
      "question": "Does the company report progress on reducing its plastic use?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Since the 1980s, plastic pollution has increased tenfold (IPBES, 2018). Projections indicate<br>\nthat global plastic production will double by 2050, with approximately 8 million tonnes entering<br>\nmarine environments annually (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). Notably,<br>\naround 50% of all plastic produced is designed for single-use purposes, contributing significantly to<br>\nthis escalating issue. There is an urgent need for companies to adopt and disclose comprehensive<br>\nplastic management strategies to reduce their plastic use.Companies must either:<br>\n<br>\nDisclose progress against the targets in element (b); only accepted if the target is timebound and measurable as specified by the requirements in element (b), or:<br>\nIf there is no target, the company must disclose three years in a row with continuous, absolute improvements on the topics assessed in element (a).<br>\n<br>\nAligned with element (a) this is unmet if the progress:<br>\nAre based on financial metrics (e.g. sales)<br>\nOnly include single product lines, or only regarding part of its operations (e.g. specific sites)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_progress_on_reducing_plastic_use+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435884,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+No use of single-use plastics",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+No_use_of_single_use_plastics.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "No use of single-use plastics",
      "question": "Does the company not use single-use plastics?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Since the 1980s, plastic pollution has increased tenfold (IPBES, 2018). Projections indicate<br>\nthat global plastic production will double by 2050, with approximately 8 million tonnes entering<br>\nmarine environments annually (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). Notably,<br>\naround 50% of all plastic produced is designed for single-use purposes, contributing significantly to<br>\nthis escalating issue. There is an urgent need for companies to adopt and disclose comprehensive<br>\nplastic management strategies to reduce their plastic use.The company reports that it uses no single-use plastics, or has disclosed a target to achieve this by 2030.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 745,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 745,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+No_use_of_single_use_plastics+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435896,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting on waste generation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_waste_generation.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting on waste generation",
      "question": "Does the company report on its waste generation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The world generates more than 2 billion tonnes of municipal solid waste annually, with at<br>\nleast 33% of it not managed in an environmentally safe manner. Without urgent action, global waste<br>\nis projected to increase by 70% by 2050, reaching 3.4 billion tonnes annually (World Bank, 2018). This<br>\ngrowing problem poses significant environmental and health risks. Companies must adopt and<br>\ndemonstrate comprehensive waste management strategies to address this critical issue. This indicator encompasses multiple forms of waste.<br>\nThe company must report quantitative metrics related to its total waste generation, including hazardous waste, non-hazardous waste and other material categories, where relevant, with clear categorical distinctions. The following categories are deemed potentially material for the listed industries.<br>\nPlastic waste:<br>\nAgricultural Products: Use of plastic in agriculture (e.g., plastic mulch) and packaging can be significant. <br>\nApparel & Footwear: Use of synthetic fibers (often plastic-based) and packaging can make plastic waste material. <br>\nChemicals: Plastics production and waste management are directly tied to this industry. <br>\nContainers & Packaging: Plastic waste is central to this industry due to packaging materials. <br>\nFood Production: Packaging waste, especially single-use plastics, is a major concern in this sector. <br>\nFood Retailers: Packaging, including plastic bags and containers, is a significant issue. <br>\nFreight & Logistics: Plastic is widely used in packaging, shipping materials, and single-use plastics. <br>\nPersonal & Household Products: High reliance on plastic packaging. <br>\nRetail: Plastic packaging and consumer waste are critical concerns here. <br>\n<br>\nFood waste:<br>\nAgricultural Products<br>\nFood Production<br>\nFood Retailers<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nTailings: <br>\nMetals & Mining: This industry generates tailings from extraction and processing of materials.<br>\n<br>\nAdditionally, a company might report on other specific types of waste that it explicitly identifies as material to their operations. <br>\nMaterial categories other than hazardous waste will be revised on a case-by-case basis. <br>\nReporting must cover the company’s entire operations. Datapoint must be from the most recent reporting period. Intensity metrics are not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_waste_generation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435908,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Targets to reduce waste generation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Targets_to_reduce_waste_generation.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Targets to reduce waste generation",
      "question": "Does the company set a target to reduce its waste generation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The world generates more than 2 billion tonnes of municipal solid waste annually, with at<br>\nleast 33% of it not managed in an environmentally safe manner. Without urgent action, global waste<br>\nis projected to increase by 70% by 2050, reaching 3.4 billion tonnes annually (World Bank, 2018). This<br>\ngrowing problem poses significant environmental and health risks. Companies must adopt and<br>\ndemonstrate comprehensive waste management strategies to address this critical issue. The company must disclose at least one target to reduce its general waste production, or at least one of its most material categories of waste (e.g. hazardous waste). <br>\n<br>\nThe target must cover all of the company’s operations. Targets that are applied to a one-off or isolated project are not accepted.<br>\n<br>\nTargets must be timebound, with a defined baseline value and year, and include clear, quantitative, and measurable metrics. They should focus on short-term progress up to 2030, with any longer-term goals broken down into interim targets no more than five years apart. Intensity targets are not accepted unless stated otherwise, as they do not ensure absolute improvements. Year-on-year targets and qualitative targets may be accepted on a case-by-case basis, depending on their ambition and measurability. Any changes to targets or their underlying assumptions must be explained, particularly in terms of impact on comparability. Additionally, targets aimed solely at maintaining current performance are not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Targets_to_reduce_waste_generation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435924,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting progress on reducing waste generation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_progress_on_reducing_waste_generation.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting progress on reducing waste generation",
      "question": "Does the company report progress on reducing its waste generation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The world generates more than 2 billion tonnes of municipal solid waste annually, with at<br>\nleast 33% of it not managed in an environmentally safe manner. Without urgent action, global waste<br>\nis projected to increase by 70% by 2050, reaching 3.4 billion tonnes annually (World Bank, 2018). This<br>\ngrowing problem poses significant environmental and health risks. Companies must adopt and<br>\ndemonstrate comprehensive waste management strategies to address this critical issue. The company must demonstrate absolute, year-on-year, quantitative reductions for three consecutive years in either its general waste generation, or metrics related to its most material category/categories of waste. <br>\n<br>\nThe company must do one of the following:<br>\nreport reduction progress against its targets in element (b). Progress against a target is only accepted if the target meets the general scoring guidance to be considered a well-defined target.<br>\nshow reductions in either its general waste generation, or in its most material category/categories of waste. If the company reports data on multiple waste categories but is only improving in one, this element can only be met if it is not regressing in any other waste category. Any increases in a waste category will result in an unmet.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_progress_on_reducing_waste_generation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435936,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Reporting on waste diverted from landfill and incineration",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_waste_diverted_from_landfill_and_incineration.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Reporting on waste diverted from landfill and incineration",
      "question": "Does the company report the proportion of its waste diverted from landfills and incineration?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The world generates more than 2 billion tonnes of municipal solid waste annually, with at<br>\nleast 33% of it not managed in an environmentally safe manner. Without urgent action, global waste<br>\nis projected to increase by 70% by 2050, reaching 3.4 billion tonnes annually (World Bank, 2018). This<br>\ngrowing problem poses significant environmental and health risks. Companies must adopt and<br>\ndemonstrate comprehensive waste management strategies to address this critical issue. The company must disclose metrics on all three of the following categories, drawn from [GRI 306-4](https://www.globalreporting.org/pdf.ashx?id=12521):<br>\n1\\.Preparation for reuse<br>\n2\\.Recycling<br>\n3\\.Other recovery operations<br>\n<br>\nReporting must cover the company’s entire operations. Datapoint must be from the most recent reporting period. Intensity metrics are not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Reporting_on_waste_diverted_from_landfill_and_incineration+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435948,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Commitment to the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_the_right_to_a_clean_healthy_and_sustainable_environment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Commitment to the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment",
      "question": "Does the company commit to respect the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The United Nations has recently declared access to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable<br>\nenvironment as a universal human right (UN, 2021). However, business activities and infrastructure<br>\nprojects often expose local communities to heightened environmental risks and adverse effects. This<br>\nchallenge is further exacerbated by the violent and sometimes fatal assaults faced by environmental<br>\nhuman rights defenders globally, who also endure intimidation, harassment and criminalisation. In<br>\nresponse to these pressing issues, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has<br>\ndeveloped a guide to help businesses incorporate environmental impacts into their human rights due<br>\ndiligence processes (UNDP).The commitment must:<br>\n<br>\nBe a publicly available policy statement (e.g. human rights policy/standards; code of conduct). A statement in a sustainability report is insufficient. <br>\nUse sufficient commitment language. The wording used in the commitment must be unequivocally clear that the company strongly commits to respect the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment, or to any of its substantial and procedural elements. Language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment. For more guidance, please refer to [The Methodology for the 2026 Social Benchmark | World Benchmarking Alliance](https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2026-social-benchmark/).<br>\nThe policy should be applied consistently across all locations regardless of law. A commitment to or compliance with local/national laws alone is not accepted. When conflicting with local/national laws, the commitment must explicitly adhere to the highest possible standard.<br>\nThe policy should cover the company’s own operations and supply chain, or the whole value chain. If the commitment is extended directly to other business relations, the compliance must go beyond an ‘expectation’ or an ‘encouragement’.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_the_right_to_a_clean_healthy_and_sustainable_environment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435964,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Environmental integration in human rights risk and impact assessment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Environmental_integration_in_human_rights_risk_and_impact_assessment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Environmental integration in human rights risk and impact assessment",
      "question": "Does the company apply environmental dimensions in its processes to identify and assess human rights risks and impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The United Nations has recently declared access to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable<br>\nenvironment as a universal human right (UN, 2021). However, business activities and infrastructure<br>\nprojects often expose local communities to heightened environmental risks and adverse effects. This<br>\nchallenge is further exacerbated by the violent and sometimes fatal assaults faced by environmental<br>\nhuman rights defenders globally, who also endure intimidation, harassment and criminalisation. In<br>\nresponse to these pressing issues, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has<br>\ndeveloped a guide to help businesses incorporate environmental impacts into their human rights due<br>\ndiligence processes (UNDP).The company must identify and assess its business’ (potential) adverse impacts that:<br>\ncause or worsen air, land, and water pollution, climate change, or biodiversity loss <strong>AND</strong> <br>\nremove or reduce the ability of individual persons, groups, and peoples to exercise and enjoy their human rights",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Environmental_integration_in_human_rights_risk_and_impact_assessment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435976,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Prevention and mitigation of human rights impacts from environmental harms",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Prevention_and_mitigation_of_human_rights_impacts_from_environmental_harms.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Prevention and mitigation of human rights impacts from environmental harms",
      "question": "Does the company prevent and mitigate actual and potential negative human rights impacts resulting from environmental harms?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The United Nations has recently declared access to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable<br>\nenvironment as a universal human right (UN, 2021). However, business activities and infrastructure<br>\nprojects often expose local communities to heightened environmental risks and adverse effects. This<br>\nchallenge is further exacerbated by the violent and sometimes fatal assaults faced by environmental<br>\nhuman rights defenders globally, who also endure intimidation, harassment and criminalisation. In<br>\nresponse to these pressing issues, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has<br>\ndeveloped a guide to help businesses incorporate environmental impacts into their human rights due<br>\ndiligence processes (UNDP).  The company describes an example of the specific actions taken or to be taken to mitigate (potential) human rights risks associated with the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment in the last three years. These measures must be linked to the company’s regular operations and respond to concrete community or individual issues.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Prevention_and_mitigation_of_human_rights_impacts_from_environmental_harms+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23435988,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Commitment to not tolerate threats or attacks against human and environmental rights defenders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_not_tolerate_threats_or_attacks_against_human_and_environmental_rights_defenders.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Commitment to not tolerate threats or attacks against human and environmental rights defenders",
      "question": "Does the company commit to neither tolerate nor contribute to threats, intimidation and attacks against human and environmental rights defenders?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The United Nations has recently declared access to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable<br>\nenvironment as a universal human right (UN, 2021). However, business activities and infrastructure<br>\nprojects often expose local communities to heightened environmental risks and adverse effects. This<br>\nchallenge is further exacerbated by the violent and sometimes fatal assaults faced by environmental<br>\nhuman rights defenders globally, who also endure intimidation, harassment and criminalisation. In<br>\nresponse to these pressing issues, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has<br>\ndeveloped a guide to help businesses incorporate environmental impacts into their human rights due<br>\ndiligence processes (UNDP).The commitment must:<br>\n<br>\nBe a publicly available policy statement (e.g. human rights policy/standards; code of conduct). A statement in a sustainability report is insufficient. <br>\nUse sufficient commitment language. The wording used in the commitment must be unequivocally clear that the company strongly commits to respect the rights of human rights defenders. Language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment. For more guidance, please refer to [The Methodology for the 2026 Social Benchmark | World Benchmarking Alliance](https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2026-social-benchmark/).<br>\nThe policy should be applied consistently across all locations regardless of law. A commitment to or compliance with local/national laws alone is not accepted. When conflicting with local/national laws, the commitment must explicitly adhere to the highest possible standard.<br>\nThe policy should cover the company’s own operations and supply chain, or the whole value chain. If the commitment is extended directly to other business relations, the compliance must go beyond an ‘expectation’ or an ‘encouragement’<br>\nIn addition, this commitment is accepted only if the company commits to not tolerate nor contribute to threats, intimidation and attacks against human rights defenders **or **to respect the rights of human rights defenders.<br>\nAttacks on human rights defenders include both physical and legal attacks. An attack/threat/harassment/intimidation can be of many kinds so a company does not need to explicitly mention both legal and physical attacks. If a policy refers to attacks/threats/harassment/intimidation in a broad sense, then this would be accepted.<br>\nCompanies do not have to explicitly mention human rights defenders in their policy as there is not a universally accepted definition of this term. Many human rights defenders on the ground don’t define themselves as such and they may be community leaders or workers’ leaders. However, in such cases, the company needs to make clear that its commitment includes people who oppose a company’s operations or have raised questions about a company’s activities, whoever they are.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_not_tolerate_threats_or_attacks_against_human_and_environmental_rights_defenders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23436004,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Commitment to respect land and natural resource rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_respect_land_and_natural_resource_rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Commitment to respect land and natural resource rights",
      "question": "Does the company commit to respect rights related to the ownership and use of land and natural resources?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "When companies seek to acquire or lease land for their business activities, it can lead to<br>\nrelocation and loss of shelter or livelihoods for communities or individual households (IFC, 2012). In<br>\ncountries where national governance and land administration are weak, local and Indigenous<br>\ncommunities are more exposed to rights violations and displacement (WRI, 2017). Indigenous peoples<br>\nare particularly vulnerable to the adverse impacts associated with land development projects,<br>\nincluding risk of impoverishment and loss of culture, identity and natural resource-based livelihoods<br>\n(IFC, 2012). Protecting and securing Indigenous peoples’ rights has been recognised as crucial to<br>\nadvancing conservation, restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies (WRI,<br>\n2019).The company must disclose an explicit commitment to respect the ownership and use of land and natural resources and related legitimate tenure rights as set out by either:<br>\nThe [Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (VGGTs](https://www.fao.org/tenure/voluntary-guidelines/en/)), or<br>\nThe [International Finance Corporation (IFC) performance standards](https://www.ifc.org/en/insights-reports/2012/ifc-performance-standards)<br>\n<br>\nThis element goes beyond a commitment to Indigenous land rights as it is relevant for every population or community, including urban communities or communities relying on resources that are not on land (e.g. coastal and marine). It is not sufficient to follow local applicable laws around land rights, as many countries have insufficient systems in place to secure land tenure rights.<br>\n<br>\nThe commitment must:<br>\nBe a publicly available policy statement (e.g. human rights policy/standards; code of conduct). A statement in a sustainability report is insufficient. <br>\nUse sufficient commitment language. The wording used in the commitment must be unequivocally clear that the company strongly commits to respect rights related to the ownership and use of land and natural resources. Language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment. For more guidance, please refer to [The Methodology for the 2026 Social Benchmark | World Benchmarking Alliance](https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2026-social-benchmark/).<br>\nThe policy should be applied consistently across all locations regardless of law. A commitment to or compliance with local/national laws alone is not accepted. When conflicting with local/national laws, the commitment must explicitly adhere to the highest possible standard.<br>\nThe policy should cover the company‚Äôs own operations and supply chain, or the whole value chain. If the commitment is extended directly to other business relations, the compliance must go beyond an ‚Äòexpectation‚Äô or an ‚Äòencouragement‚Äô",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_respect_land_and_natural_resource_rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23436016,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Commitment to obtain free, prior and informed consent",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_obtain_free_prior_and_informed_consent.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Commitment to obtain free, prior and informed consent",
      "question": "Does the company commit to obtain free, prior and informed consent?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "When companies seek to acquire or lease land for their business activities, it can lead to<br>\nrelocation and loss of shelter or livelihoods for communities or individual households (IFC, 2012). In<br>\ncountries where national governance and land administration are weak, local and Indigenous<br>\ncommunities are more exposed to rights violations and displacement (WRI, 2017). Indigenous peoples<br>\nare particularly vulnerable to the adverse impacts associated with land development projects,<br>\nincluding risk of impoverishment and loss of culture, identity and natural resource-based livelihoods<br>\n(IFC, 2012). Protecting and securing Indigenous peoples’ rights has been recognised as crucial to<br>\nadvancing conservation, restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies (WRI,<br>\n2019).The company must disclose an explicit commitment to obtaining free, prior and informed consent, including clearly demonstrating whether FPIC was a determining factor for the way in which a project proceeds. Accepted examples include:<br>\nCommitment to obtaining (and maintaining) Free, Prior and Informed Consent (for all relevant projects)<br>\nCommitment to the [ICMM position statement on Indigenous Peoples](https://www.icmm.com/en-gb/our-principles/position-statements/indigenous-peoples), which includes a commitment to obtain agreement with affected indigenous peoples by following an FPIC process.<br>\n<br>\nThe commitment must:<br>\nBe a publicly available policy statement (e.g. human rights policy/standards; code of conduct). A statement in a sustainability report is insufficient. <br>\nUse sufficient commitment language. The wording used in the commitment must be unequivocally clear that the company strongly commits to obtain free, prior and informed consent. Language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment. For more guidance, please refer to [The Methodology for the 2026 Social Benchmark | World Benchmarking Alliance](https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2026-social-benchmark/).<br>\nThe policy should be applied consistently across all locations regardless of law. A commitment to or compliance with local/national laws alone is not accepted. When conflicting with local/national laws, the commitment must explicitly adhere to the highest possible standard.<br>\nThe policy should cover the company‚Äôs own operations and supply chain, or the whole value chain. If the commitment is extended directly to other business relations, the compliance must go beyond an ‚Äòexpectation‚Äô or an ‚Äòencouragement‚Äô<br>\n<br>\nExamples of weak language leading to unmet includes:<br>\nCommitment to respect the rights of Indigenous Peoples to consultation.<br>\nRecognition of FPIC as an important process / promoting FPIC, or similar.<br>\nStatements with insufficient commitment language. E.g., seeking to apply (the principles of) FPIC / striving to obtain FPIC.<br>\nLimitations on when FPIC should and should not be obtained, i.e. ‚Äòwhere practical‚Äô, or only mentioning specific locations.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_obtain_free_prior_and_informed_consent+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23436028,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Business relationships required to obtain free, prior and informed consent",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Business_relationships_required_to_obtain_free_prior_and_informed_consent.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Business relationships required to obtain free, prior and informed consent",
      "question": "Does the company require its business relationships to obtain free, prior and informed consent?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "When companies seek to acquire or lease land for their business activities, it can lead to<br>\nrelocation and loss of shelter or livelihoods for communities or individual households (IFC, 2012). In<br>\ncountries where national governance and land administration are weak, local and Indigenous<br>\ncommunities are more exposed to rights violations and displacement (WRI, 2017). Indigenous peoples<br>\nare particularly vulnerable to the adverse impacts associated with land development projects,<br>\nincluding risk of impoverishment and loss of culture, identity and natural resource-based livelihoods<br>\n(IFC, 2012). Protecting and securing Indigenous peoples’ rights has been recognised as crucial to<br>\nadvancing conservation, restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies (WRI,<br>\n2019).The company must disclose an explicit commitment to expecting or requiring its business partners to obtain free, prior and informed consent, including clearly demonstrating whether FPIC was a determining factor for the way in which a project proceeds. Companies must demonstrate at least one of the following:<br>\nCommitment to obtaining (and maintaining) Free, Prior and Informed Consent (for all relevant projects)<br>\nCommitment to the [ICMM position statement on Indigenous Peoples](https://www.icmm.com/en-gb/our-principles/position-statements/indigenous-peoples), which includes a commitment to obtain agreement with affected indigenous peoples by following an FPIC process.<br>\n<br>\nThe commitment must:<br>\nBe a publicly available policy statement (e.g. human rights policy/standards; code of conduct). A statement in a sustainability report is insufficient. <br>\nUse sufficient commitment language. The wording used in the commitment must be unequivocally clear that the company requires its business relationships to obtain free, prior and informed consent for its. Language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment. For more guidance, please refer to [The Methodology for the 2026 Social Benchmark | World Benchmarking Alliance](https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2026-social-benchmark/).<br>\nThe policy should cover all company‚Äôs business relationships comprehensively and none should be excluded. <br>\nThe policy should be applied consistently across all locations regardless of law. A commitment to or compliance with local/national laws alone is not accepted. When conflicting with local/national laws, the commitment must explicitly adhere to the highest possible standard.<br>\n<br>\nExamples of weak language leading to unmet includes:<br>\nCommitment to respect the rights of Indigenous Peoples to consultation.<br>\nRecognition of FPIC as an important process / promoting FPIC, or similar.<br>\nStatements with insufficient commitment language. E.g., seeking to apply (the principles of) FPIC / striving to obtain FPIC.<br>\nLimitations on when FPIC should and should not be obtained, i.e. ‚Äòwhere practical‚Äô, or only mentioning specific locations.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Business_relationships_required_to_obtain_free_prior_and_informed_consent+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23436044,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Disclosure of examples of free, prior and informed consent or negotiation with rightsholders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Disclosure_of_examples_of_free_prior_and_informed_consent_or_negotiation_with_rightsholders.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Disclosure of examples of free, prior and informed consent or negotiation with rightsholders",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the most recent example where it has obtained free, prior and informed consent or negotiated with rightsholders?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "When companies seek to acquire or lease land for their business activities, it can lead to<br>\nrelocation and loss of shelter or livelihoods for communities or individual households (IFC, 2012). In<br>\ncountries where national governance and land administration are weak, local and Indigenous<br>\ncommunities are more exposed to rights violations and displacement (WRI, 2017). Indigenous peoples<br>\nare particularly vulnerable to the adverse impacts associated with land development projects,<br>\nincluding risk of impoverishment and loss of culture, identity and natural resource-based livelihoods<br>\n(IFC, 2012). Protecting and securing Indigenous peoples’ rights has been recognised as crucial to<br>\nadvancing conservation, restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies (WRI,<br>\n2019).The company must:<br>\nProvide evidence of a situation where it negotiated with Indigenous Peoples or local communities to use their land/resources <strong>OR</strong> <br>\nDecided to not pursue a project due to impacts on IP or legitimate tenure right holders.<br>\n<br>\nEligible examples could include:<br>\nEvidence of a negotiation process.<br>\nHaving obtained free, prior and informed consent (FPIC), and not just evidence of a consultation.<br>\nEvidence of a decision to not pursue the land or resourced impacting Indigenous Peoples‚Äô after consultation, engagement or research (for example, because FPIC was not obtained).<br>\nAn engagement protocol to guarantee adequate compensation. <br>\nAn example of benefit sharing with IPLCs arising from using land and/or natural resources where they hold rights or interests.<br>\n<br>\nIf the company has not engaged in any land transactions in the past three years which could impact Indigenous Peoples or local communities, it should describe its approach to identifying and negotiating legitimate tenure rights holders in general. <br>\n<br>\nCompanies whose operations do not require consulting and negotiating with legitimate tenure rightsholders can meet this element by demonstrating an instance in which one of their business relationships has done any of the above.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Disclosure_of_examples_of_free_prior_and_informed_consent_or_negotiation_with_rightsholders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23436056,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Disclosure of stakeholder engagement process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Disclosure_of_stakeholder_engagement_process.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Disclosure of stakeholder engagement process",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its stakeholder engagement process?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Meeting the interests of all stakeholders is essential for a business’s long-term success.<br>\nRegular engagement with stakeholders enhances the company’s understanding of diverse and often<br>\nconflicting perspectives, fosters innovation and facilitates the development of robust and inclusive<br>\nstrategies. Companies are expected to undertake meaningful stakeholder engagement, which should<br>\nyield clear outcomes or actions, as well as transparently acknowledge how stakeholder inputs are<br>\nused.The company must disclose the channel and frequency it uses to engage with different societal stakeholder groups. Examples of eligible societal stakeholder groups includes:<br>\n<br>\nNGOs and CSOs<br>\ngovernments<br>\nlocal communities<br>\nacademic institutions<br>\nmedia<br>\nvulnerable groups<br>\ntenure rights holders<br>\n<br>\nStakeholder groups that do not count as societal includes <br>\nEmployees<br>\ninvestors <br>\nsuppliers<br>\ncustomers<br>\nshareholders<br>\nbusiness partners<br>\n****<br>\nIt is insufficient for the company to specify a list of channels if they do not indicate how these correspond to each stakeholder group.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Disclosure_of_stakeholder_engagement_process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23436072,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Disclosure of issues raised during stakeholder engagement process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Disclosure_of_issues_raised_during_stakeholder_engagement_process.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Disclosure of issues raised during stakeholder engagement process",
      "question": "Does the company disclose issues raised during its stakeholder engagement process?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Meeting the interests of all stakeholders is essential for a business’s long-term success.<br>\nRegular engagement with stakeholders enhances the company’s understanding of diverse and often<br>\nconflicting perspectives, fosters innovation and facilitates the development of robust and inclusive<br>\nstrategies. Companies are expected to undertake meaningful stakeholder engagement, which should<br>\nyield clear outcomes or actions, as well as transparently acknowledge how stakeholder inputs are<br>\nused.The company should disclose specific and concrete concerns raised by each stakeholder group in the reporting year's engagement. It is insufficient for the company to provide a list of issues without specifying the corresponding stakeholder groups. <br>\nWhile the list of issues should go beyond the materiality assessment, companies can have overlapping issues with what they identified in the materiality assessment, as long as these issues are directly raised during stakeholder engagement.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Disclosure_of_issues_raised_during_stakeholder_engagement_process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23436084,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Disclosure of responses to issues raised during stakeholder engagement process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Disclosure_of_responses_to_issues_raised_during_stakeholder_engagement_process.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Disclosure of responses to issues raised during stakeholder engagement process",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its responses to issues raised during its stakeholder engagement process?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Meeting the interests of all stakeholders is essential for a business’s long-term success.<br>\nRegular engagement with stakeholders enhances the company’s understanding of diverse and often<br>\nconflicting perspectives, fosters innovation and facilitates the development of robust and inclusive<br>\nstrategies. Companies are expected to undertake meaningful stakeholder engagement, which should<br>\nyield clear outcomes or actions, as well as transparently acknowledge how stakeholder inputs are<br>\nused.The company should disclose at least two systemic actions taken in response to key issues raised by its stakeholders in the reporting year's engagement. Systemic actions refer to comprehensive and transformative measures that aim for a holistic and sustainable impact, such as actions that cover the majority of the company's locations or business activities, address the root causes of problems, or bring about changes in business models. <br>\n<br>\nProviding only a general description of guidelines or a recap of the materiality assessment is insufficient. Disclosing only the output, such as the number of sessions held, without detailing the actual outcomes and actions, is also insufficient. <br>\n<br>\nIf the company links to the relevant chapters to signal their responses, and those responses are indeed systemic actions, it is considered sufficient. The responses must be explicitly linked to the corresponding issues in the appropriate report section.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Disclosure_of_responses_to_issues_raised_during_stakeholder_engagement_process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23436100,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Engagement with marginalised stakeholders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Engagement_with_marginalised_stakeholders.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Engagement with marginalised stakeholders",
      "question": "Does the company engage with marginalised stakeholders?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.<br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/nature-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Meeting the interests of all stakeholders is essential for a business’s long-term success.<br>\nRegular engagement with stakeholders enhances the company’s understanding of diverse and often<br>\nconflicting perspectives, fosters innovation and facilitates the development of robust and inclusive<br>\nstrategies. Companies are expected to undertake meaningful stakeholder engagement, which should<br>\nyield clear outcomes or actions, as well as transparently acknowledge how stakeholder inputs are<br>\nused.The company should identify and recognize marginalized, vulnerable, and/or Indigenous stakeholders or their representatives in areas where operations or proposed operations may impact these stakeholders. The company should disclose at least one systemic action that demonstrates engagement with such stakeholders (see element (c) for guidance). This engagement must be relevant to the company‚Äôs regular operations.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 750,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 750,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Engagement_with_marginalised_stakeholders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23448826,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Digital Access Programme for Vulnerable Groups",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Digital_Access_Programme_for_Vulnerable_Groups.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Digital Access Programme for Vulnerable Groups",
      "question": "Does the company have a programme that contributes to expanding digital access for vulnerable groups through infrastructure development, affordability measures or devices provision?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "SDG target 9.c calls for universal and affordable access to the Internet. Additionally, the Global Digital Compact calls for increasing the availability and affordability of digital technologies for an inclusive, open, sustainable, fair, safe and secure digital future for all.xi Yet the world remains far from achieving this target. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) estimates that 33% of the world’s population – around 2.6 billion people – was still offline in 2023.xii Most of these people reside in low- and middle-income countries, while those who lack digital access in high-income countries are mainly vulnerable groups, such as ethnic minorities, people with disabilities and elderly people.<br>\n<br>\nCompany best practices for this indicator involve measurable actions to help those lacking digital access get and stay connected. In the case of telecommunication companies, this could involve offering reduced connectivity prices for those with low incomes. Similarly, hardware companies might provide subsidised devices, enabling digital access for disadvantaged people. Participation in open, vendor-neutral initiatives to lower deployment costs in remote and rural areas is another example. These examples are illustrative, and companies may have other ways in which they support the goal of improving availability and affordability of digital technologies.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses a programme that actively contributes to expand digital access for vulnerable groups through infrastructure development, affordability measures or devices provision (e.g.: provision of subsidised devices that help people going online; infrastructure development in underserved areas; digital centres). To meet the requirements of this element, the programme must be explicitly designed to serve vulnerable groups, such as children, youth, women, older persons, rural, persons with disabilities, migrants, refugees, indigenous people, people living in poverty, LGBTQIA+ people, people of African descent, Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities. The programme or initiative must be operated by the company or have company‚s support in the form of funding (e.g. grant, donation). Evidence shall include a description of the programme. To be considered, the programme must have been running in the reporting period of interest of the assessment in question.<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> programmes from the company‚s Foundation are accepted. If this element is not met, elements c to e can‚t be met.</em><br>\nNot in scope: initiatives for people with disabilities not focusing on infrastructure, affordability and devices provision.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Digital_Access_Programme_for_Vulnerable_Groups+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23448838,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sustained Digital Access for Vulnerable Groups",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustained_Digital_Access_for_Vulnerable_Groups.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sustained Digital Access for Vulnerable Groups",
      "question": "Does the company demonstrate a sustained approach to expand digital access for vulnerable groups through infrastructure development, affordability measures or devices provision?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "SDG target 9.c calls for universal and affordable access to the Internet. Additionally, the Global Digital Compact calls for increasing the availability and affordability of digital technologies for an inclusive, open, sustainable, fair, safe and secure digital future for all.xi Yet the world remains far from achieving this target. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) estimates that 33% of the world’s population – around 2.6 billion people – was still offline in 2023.xii Most of these people reside in low- and middle-income countries, while those who lack digital access in high-income countries are mainly vulnerable groups, such as ethnic minorities, people with disabilities and elderly people.<br>\n<br>\nCompany best practices for this indicator involve measurable actions to help those lacking digital access get and stay connected. In the case of telecommunication companies, this could involve offering reduced connectivity prices for those with low incomes. Similarly, hardware companies might provide subsidised devices, enabling digital access for disadvantaged people. Participation in open, vendor-neutral initiatives to lower deployment costs in remote and rural areas is another example. These examples are illustrative, and companies may have other ways in which they support the goal of improving availability and affordability of digital technologies.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company provides evidence that it advances digital access for vulnerable groups specifically through infrastructure build-out, affordability initiatives, or provision of devices, and does so with durable resourcing and governance (e.g., multi-year funding, ongoing delivery, mechanisms for scale).<br>\nTo meet this element, the company must provide evidence of one or more of the following:<br>\n- evidence that digital access is not treated as a short-term commitment or ad hoc issue, but rather as a core area of sustained social investment;<br>\n- evidence of having more than one programme running to support digital access;<br>\n- evidence of a multi-year roadmap and dedicated multi-year funding for supporting digital access for vulnerable groups.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustained_Digital_Access_for_Vulnerable_Groups+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23448850,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Goal Disclosure: Digital Access for Vulnerable Groups",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Goal_Disclosure_Digital_Access_for_Vulnerable_Groups.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Goal Disclosure: Digital Access for Vulnerable Groups",
      "question": "Does the company disclose information on the goal for its programme to support the availability and affordability of digital technologies for vulnerable groups?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "SDG target 9.c calls for universal and affordable access to the Internet. Additionally, the Global Digital Compact calls for increasing the availability and affordability of digital technologies for an inclusive, open, sustainable, fair, safe and secure digital future for all.xi Yet the world remains far from achieving this target. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) estimates that 33% of the world’s population – around 2.6 billion people – was still offline in 2023.xii Most of these people reside in low- and middle-income countries, while those who lack digital access in high-income countries are mainly vulnerable groups, such as ethnic minorities, people with disabilities and elderly people.<br>\n<br>\nCompany best practices for this indicator involve measurable actions to help those lacking digital access get and stay connected. In the case of telecommunication companies, this could involve offering reduced connectivity prices for those with low incomes. Similarly, hardware companies might provide subsidised devices, enabling digital access for disadvantaged people. Participation in open, vendor-neutral initiatives to lower deployment costs in remote and rural areas is another example. These examples are illustrative, and companies may have other ways in which they support the goal of improving availability and affordability of digital technologies.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses the goal or intended impact of its programme that contributes to the availability or affordability of digital technologies, demonstrating a clear understanding of the issue being addressed and how its activities contribute to a meaningful solution for the impact individuals/communities. To meet the requirements of this element, the company must disclose one or more of the following: <br>\n- The company states the specific objective(s) of its programme. Objectives should be specific and clearly aligned with the programme‚s activities and the needs of vulnerable groups;<br>\n- The company discloses the anticipated results of the programme, which gives an indication of how success will be measured qualitatively or quantitatively over time; <br>\n- The company sets concrete targets** **for the programme, either for the short- or long-term.<br>\n- General statements of support or purpose without specific objectives, outcomes, or targets will not meet the requirements of this indicator.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Goal_Disclosure_Digital_Access_for_Vulnerable_Groups+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23448862,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Input/Output Metrics: Digital Access for Vulnerable Groups",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Input_Output_Metrics_Digital_Access_for_Vulnerable_Groups.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Input/Output Metrics: Digital Access for Vulnerable Groups",
      "question": "Does the company report input or output metrics for its programme to support the availability and affordability of digital technologies for vulnerable groups?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "SDG target 9.c calls for universal and affordable access to the Internet. Additionally, the Global Digital Compact calls for increasing the availability and affordability of digital technologies for an inclusive, open, sustainable, fair, safe and secure digital future for all.xi Yet the world remains far from achieving this target. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) estimates that 33% of the world’s population – around 2.6 billion people – was still offline in 2023.xii Most of these people reside in low- and middle-income countries, while those who lack digital access in high-income countries are mainly vulnerable groups, such as ethnic minorities, people with disabilities and elderly people.<br>\n<br>\nCompany best practices for this indicator involve measurable actions to help those lacking digital access get and stay connected. In the case of telecommunication companies, this could involve offering reduced connectivity prices for those with low incomes. Similarly, hardware companies might provide subsidised devices, enabling digital access for disadvantaged people. Participation in open, vendor-neutral initiatives to lower deployment costs in remote and rural areas is another example. These examples are illustrative, and companies may have other ways in which they support the goal of improving availability and affordability of digital technologies.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses information on the resources invested in its programme, the activities delivered, as well as the immediate results or reach of the programme. This includes but not limited to information on how much money was allocated, donated, or invested in the programme; metrics related to personnel involvement, such as number of volunteer hours, number of employees deployed, or time allocated to the specific programme development or delivery; disclosures of material, technology, or infrastructure provided; participation, satisfaction or engagement metrics, number of people directly reached or supported, number of organisations supported. A company‚s reporting of aggregated metrics for all their digital inclusion efforts is not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Input_Output_Metrics_Digital_Access_for_Vulnerable_Groups+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23448874,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Progress or Impact of Digital Access Programme",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Progress_or_Impact_of_Digital_Access_Programme.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Progress or Impact of Digital Access Programme",
      "question": "Does the company demonstrate the progress or impact of its programme?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "SDG target 9.c calls for universal and affordable access to the Internet. Additionally, the Global Digital Compact calls for increasing the availability and affordability of digital technologies for an inclusive, open, sustainable, fair, safe and secure digital future for all.xi Yet the world remains far from achieving this target. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) estimates that 33% of the world’s population – around 2.6 billion people – was still offline in 2023.xii Most of these people reside in low- and middle-income countries, while those who lack digital access in high-income countries are mainly vulnerable groups, such as ethnic minorities, people with disabilities and elderly people.<br>\n<br>\nCompany best practices for this indicator involve measurable actions to help those lacking digital access get and stay connected. In the case of telecommunication companies, this could involve offering reduced connectivity prices for those with low incomes. Similarly, hardware companies might provide subsidised devices, enabling digital access for disadvantaged people. Participation in open, vendor-neutral initiatives to lower deployment costs in remote and rural areas is another example. These examples are illustrative, and companies may have other ways in which they support the goal of improving availability and affordability of digital technologies.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company provides evidence of the changes that happen to vulnerable groups, organisations supported, the company employees, or company business as a result of the programme. The company may disclose one or more of the following:<br>\n- Evidence of the progress made toward the programme‚s stated goals or targets. This may include interim updates showing how the programme is tracking against milestones across time, coverage goals, or other indicators of planned progress.<br>\n- Evidence of outcome or impact data, comparing results to a baseline measurement taken before the programme began.<br>\n- Findings of internal or external monitoring efforts, including: the methods used (e.g. surveys, interviews, usage data, case studies), sources of data, limitations or context for interpreting the results.<br>\nIn best-case disclosures, the company may provide results from a third-party evaluation, such as an impact assessment comparing with a control group or other inferential methods, which enhances the credibility and robustness of the data.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Progress_or_Impact_of_Digital_Access_Programme+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23448886,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Digital Access Programme Targeting Women and Girls",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Digital_Access_Programme_Targeting_Women_and_Girls.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Digital Access Programme Targeting Women and Girls",
      "question": "Does the company have an availability and affordability programme that is intended specifically for women and girls, with clear targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "SDG target 9.c calls for universal and affordable access to the Internet. Additionally, the Global Digital Compact calls for increasing the availability and affordability of digital technologies for an inclusive, open, sustainable, fair, safe and secure digital future for all.xi Yet the world remains far from achieving this target. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) estimates that 33% of the world’s population – around 2.6 billion people – was still offline in 2023.xii Most of these people reside in low- and middle-income countries, while those who lack digital access in high-income countries are mainly vulnerable groups, such as ethnic minorities, people with disabilities and elderly people.<br>\n<br>\nCompany best practices for this indicator involve measurable actions to help those lacking digital access get and stay connected. In the case of telecommunication companies, this could involve offering reduced connectivity prices for those with low incomes. Similarly, hardware companies might provide subsidised devices, enabling digital access for disadvantaged people. Participation in open, vendor-neutral initiatives to lower deployment costs in remote and rural areas is another example. These examples are illustrative, and companies may have other ways in which they support the goal of improving availability and affordability of digital technologies.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses a programme that contributes to the availability or affordability of digital technologies that is explicitly designed to address the needs of women and/or girls. The company is taking intentional and targeted action to address gender-based digital inequality when it comes to access to these technologies.<br>\nGeneral programmes that incidentally include women and girls are not sufficient to meet this element. The programme must be specifically intended for women and/or girls and reflect that intent through its design, goal or intended impact. The programme or initiative must be operated by the company or have company‚s support in the form of funding (e.g. grant, donation). Evidence shall include a description of the programme. To be considered, the programme must have been running in the reporting period of interest of the assessment in question.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Digital_Access_Programme_Targeting_Women_and_Girls+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23448898,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+School Digitalisation Programme",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+School_Digitalisation_Programme.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "School Digitalisation Programme",
      "question": "Does the company have a programme that enables or improves digitalisation in primary or secondary schools?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Digital technology companies can play a critical role in reducing digital inequality and educational disparity, and promote inclusive access to learning. They can make an important contribution to improving school digitalisation as part of a broader commitment to digital skills development and connectivity. This can be done, for example, by promoting access to devices, labs, Internet connection or other connected devices; digital educational technologies; teacher training to integrate digital technologies, etc.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses a programme that actively contributes to providing or improving digitalisation in primary or secondary schools. <br>\nThe programme must have at least one of the following:<br>\n- Provide hardware or digital technology component such as internet connection, routers, satellite or Wi-Fi; digital devices, ICT labs or any physical digital infrastructure.<br>\n- Support a school connectivity initiative by sharing relevant data.<br>\n- Provide free internet access.<br>\n- Provide digital educational technologies that support school digitalisation<br>\n- Develop, offer or improve multimedia, educational online resources, educational apps, open education digital resources or platforms. <br>\n- Provide access to software. <br>\n- Provide training to teachers on the use of digital tools for learning, digital technologies integration in learning, or on skills to teach students to use digital technologies or to develop knowledge and skills for a digital society.<br>\nTo meet the requirements of this element, the programme must be explicitly designed to serve schools or students. In addition, the company must collaborate with relevant partners‚Äîsuch as NGOs, community groups, government bodies, or other companies‚Äîin the implementation or scaling of the programme. To be considered, the programme must have been running in the reporting period of interest of the assessment in question. <br>\nOne-off donations, funding to grantees, foundation grants are accepted for this element. <br>\nNote: programmes from the company‚s Foundation are accepted. If this element is not met, elements c to e can‚t be met.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+School_Digitalisation_Programme+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23448910,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sustained Approach to School Digitalisation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustained_Approach_to_School_Digitalisation.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sustained Approach to School Digitalisation",
      "question": "Does the company demonstrate a sustained approach to support school digitalisation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Digital technology companies can play a critical role in reducing digital inequality and educational disparity, and promote inclusive access to learning. They can make an important contribution to improving school digitalisation as part of a broader commitment to digital skills development and connectivity. This can be done, for example, by promoting access to devices, labs, Internet connection or other connected devices; digital educational technologies; teacher training to integrate digital technologies, etc.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company provides evidence of commitment to school digitalisation through long-term investments, continued programme delivery, and/or institutional mechanisms that ensure continuity and scale over time. To meet this element, the company must provide evidence of one or more of the following:<br>\n- evidence that school digitalisation is not treated as a short-term commitment or ad hoc issue, but rather as a core area of sustained social investment;<br>\n- evidence of having more than one programme running to support school digitalisation;<br>\n- evidence of a multi-year roadmap and dedicated multi-year funding for supporting school digitalisation.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustained_Approach_to_School_Digitalisation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23448922,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Goal Disclosure: School Digitalisation Programme",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Goal_Disclosure_School_Digitalisation_Programme.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Goal Disclosure: School Digitalisation Programme",
      "question": "Does the company disclose information on the goal for its programme to support school digitalisation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Digital technology companies can play a critical role in reducing digital inequality and educational disparity, and promote inclusive access to learning. They can make an important contribution to improving school digitalisation as part of a broader commitment to digital skills development and connectivity. This can be done, for example, by promoting access to devices, labs, Internet connection or other connected devices; digital educational technologies; teacher training to integrate digital technologies, etc.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses the goal or intended impact of its programme that contributes to providing or improving digitalisation in primary or secondary schools, demonstrating a clear understanding of the issue being addressed and how its activities contribute to a meaningful solution for the impacted individuals/communities. To meet the requirements of this element, the company must disclose one or more of the following: <br>\n- The company states the specific objective(s) of its programme. Objectives should be specific and clearly aligned with the programme‚s activities and schools‚ needs;<br>\n- The company discloses the anticipated results of the programme, which gives an indication of how success will be measured qualitatively or quantitatively over time; <br>\n- The company sets concrete targets** **for the programme, either for the short- or long-term.<br>\nGeneral statements of support or purpose without specific objectives, outcomes, or targets will not meet the requirements of this indicator.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Goal_Disclosure_School_Digitalisation_Programme+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23448934,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Input/Output Metrics: School Digitalisation Programme",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Input_Output_Metrics_School_Digitalisation_Programme.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Input/Output Metrics: School Digitalisation Programme",
      "question": "Does the company report input or output metrics for its programme to support school digitisation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Digital technology companies can play a critical role in reducing digital inequality and educational disparity, and promote inclusive access to learning. They can make an important contribution to improving school digitalisation as part of a broader commitment to digital skills development and connectivity. This can be done, for example, by promoting access to devices, labs, Internet connection or other connected devices; digital educational technologies; teacher training to integrate digital technologies, etc.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses information on the resources invested in its school digitalisation programme, the activities delivered as well as the immediate results or reach of the programme. This includes but not limited to information on how much money was allocated, donated, or invested in the programme; metrics related to personnel involvement, such as number of volunteer hours, number of employees deployed, or time allocated to the specific programme development or delivery; disclosures of material, technology, or infrastructure provided; participation, satisfaction or engagement metrics, number of people directly reached or supported, number of organisations supported. A company‚s reporting of aggregated metrics for all their digital inclusion efforts is not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Input_Output_Metrics_School_Digitalisation_Programme+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23448946,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Progress or Impact of School Digitalisation Programme",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Progress_or_Impact_of_School_Digitalisation_Programme.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Progress or Impact of School Digitalisation Programme",
      "question": "Does the company demonstrate the progress or impact of its programme?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Digital technology companies can play a critical role in reducing digital inequality and educational disparity, and promote inclusive access to learning. They can make an important contribution to improving school digitalisation as part of a broader commitment to digital skills development and connectivity. This can be done, for example, by promoting access to devices, labs, Internet connection or other connected devices; digital educational technologies; teacher training to integrate digital technologies, etc.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company provides evidence of the changes that happen to vulnerable groups, organisations supported, the company employees, or company business as a result of the school digitisation programme. The company may disclose one or more of the following:<br>\n- Evidence of theprogress made toward the programme‚s stated goals or targets. This may include interim updates showing how the programme is tracking against milestones across time, coverage goals, or other indicators of planned progress.<br>\n- Evidence of outcome or impact data, comparing results to a baseline measurement taken before the programme began.<br>\n- Findings of internal or external monitoring efforts, including: the methods used (e.g. surveys, interviews, usage data, case studies), sources of data, limitations or context for interpreting the results.<br>\nIn best-case disclosures, the company may provide results from a third-party evaluation, such as an impact assessment comparing with a control group or other inferential methods, which enhances the credibility and robustness of the data.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Progress_or_Impact_of_School_Digitalisation_Programme+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23448958,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Commitment to Accessible Design Principles",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_Accessible_Design_Principles.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Commitment to Accessible Design Principles",
      "question": "Does the company commit to integrating accessible design principles in its digital products or services?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The SDGs call for a reduction in inequalities. SDG target 10.2 is particularly relevant here: ‘By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion or economic or other status.’ The ability of diverse groups of users to access digital products is critical for inclusion.<br>\nAn estimated 1.3 billion people – or 16% of the global population – experience a significant disabilityxiii. People with disabilities are less likely to use digital technologies, such as a computer or the Internet. In the United States, for example, 72% of people with disabilities said that they owned smartphones, compared with 88% of those without a disability.xiv<br>\nFor digital technology companies, prioritising accessibility is critical not only for digital inclusion but also for compliance with global human rights frameworks, such as the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which advocates for accessible technology as a fundamental right. Companies should strive to ensure that no one is digitally excluded for economic, physical or social reasons.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company publicly acknowledges its responsibility to ensure that digital interfaces are usable by all individuals, including people with disabilities, and whether this is supported by adherence to recognized accessibility standards or frameworks. To meet the requirements of this element, the company shall:<br>\n- commit to integrating accessible design principles in its digital products or services. For companies selling consumer-facing technological products or services (e.g. mobile phones, TVs, VR sets, delivery services, etc), the commitment must apply to all products (i.e a commitment to an accessible website is not enough). For other companies, the commitment must apply at least to the website or other digital service platforms used by clients or the public. The commitment must apply at group level.<br>\n- disclose its accessible or inclusive design principles into its digital products or services in a standalone policy document or webpage, or has obtained a certification of universal accessibility<br>\nThe commitment should reflect a company-wide approach, not just isolated product features or pilot efforts .<br>\nThis element requires a company to make a commitment in a policy document or webpage. WBA does not accept a commitment found in a report (e.g. an annual or sustainability report that is updated annually) even if the company explains that it is company policy and/or it is approved by the highest governing body. This requires the company to make a commitment using strong language such as:<br>\n- We respect,<br>\n- We commit to respect,<br>\n- Aligned with,<br>\n- We adhere to inclusive design, accessible design, universal design.<br>\n- We adhere as closely as possible to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), published by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).<br>\n- We adopt the digital accessibility standards laid out by the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines.<br>\n- Our products or services are accessible to all.<br>\n- When the principles are disclosed as part of another Policy document, it is accepted.<br>\nWords that are NOT accepted:<br>\nWe follow, We support the right to, Consistent with, In line with, Informed by, Striving to ensure rights are upheld, Recognise the principles of, Guided by, Based on, We base our requirements on, We promote, We subscribe to, We have respect for, We embrace.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_Accessible_Design_Principles+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23448970,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Digital Accessibility Enhancements for Products or Services",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Digital_Accessibility_Enhancements_for_Products_or_Services.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Digital Accessibility Enhancements for Products or Services",
      "question": "Does the company provide evidence of enhancing digital accessibility of its products or services?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The SDGs call for a reduction in inequalities. SDG target 10.2 is particularly relevant here: ‘By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion or economic or other status.’ The ability of diverse groups of users to access digital products is critical for inclusion.<br>\nAn estimated 1.3 billion people – or 16% of the global population – experience a significant disabilityxiii. People with disabilities are less likely to use digital technologies, such as a computer or the Internet. In the United States, for example, 72% of people with disabilities said that they owned smartphones, compared with 88% of those without a disability.xiv<br>\nFor digital technology companies, prioritising accessibility is critical not only for digital inclusion but also for compliance with global human rights frameworks, such as the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which advocates for accessible technology as a fundamental right. Companies should strive to ensure that no one is digitally excluded for economic, physical or social reasons.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company provides evidence of systemic action to improve the digital accessibility of its products or services for end users. Systemic actions refer to comprehensive and transformative measures that aim for a holistic and sustainable impact, such as actions that cover the majority of the company's locations or business activities, address the root causes of problems, or bring about changes in business models. Actions should have been taken (or initiatives active) in the last three years. To meet this element, the company may disclose one or more of the following:<br>\n- Product or service design changes aimed at making digital content more accessible.<br>\n- Systemic implementation of accessibility standards or features across a significant portion of the company‚s digital platforms, channels, or services. <br>\n- Proactive feedback mechanisms involving persons with disabilities to test and improve product accessibility. <br>\nGeneral statements such as ‚our products are for everyone‚ without concrete accessibility features are not accepted. Likewise, accessibility initiatives focused only on the workplace or internal users are not included here.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Digital_Accessibility_Enhancements_for_Products_or_Services+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23448982,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Workplace Inclusivity for Persons with Disabilities",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workplace_Inclusivity_for_Persons_with_Disabilities.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Workplace Inclusivity for Persons with Disabilities",
      "question": "Does the company promote inclusivity for persons with disabilities in the workplace?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The SDGs call for a reduction in inequalities. SDG target 10.2 is particularly relevant here: ‘By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion or economic or other status.’ The ability of diverse groups of users to access digital products is critical for inclusion.<br>\nAn estimated 1.3 billion people – or 16% of the global population – experience a significant disabilityxiii. People with disabilities are less likely to use digital technologies, such as a computer or the Internet. In the United States, for example, 72% of people with disabilities said that they owned smartphones, compared with 88% of those without a disability.xiv<br>\nFor digital technology companies, prioritising accessibility is critical not only for digital inclusion but also for compliance with global human rights frameworks, such as the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which advocates for accessible technology as a fundamental right. Companies should strive to ensure that no one is digitally excluded for economic, physical or social reasons.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company demonstrates that it promotes inclusivity for persons with disabilities (PWDs) in the workplace. To meet the this element, the company must: 1) disclose data on the employment of persons with disabilities within its workforce such as number of employees who identify as having a disability. Disclosure may be limited to specific jurisdictions if national legislation restricts global data collection; 2) provide evidence that its workplace is accessible to employees with disabilities. This may include physical accessibility (e.g. wheelchair access, adapted workspaces) and disability inclusive practices (e.g. staff training on disability inclusion, disability-inclusive HR and promotion policies, etc.)<br>\nWorkplace actions must benefit employees, not only customers or external stakeholders with disabilities.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workplace_Inclusivity_for_Persons_with_Disabilities+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23448994,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Digital Literacy Programme for Vulnerable Groups",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Digital_Literacy_Programme_for_Vulnerable_Groups.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Digital Literacy Programme for Vulnerable Groups",
      "question": "Does the company have a programme that aims to support digital literacy development for vulnerable groups?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Digital literacy covers the proficiencies needed to carry out fundamental digital tasks, such as using a computer keyboard or smartphone touchscreen, managing privacy settings, sending emails, searching the web or filling out an online form. These skills allow users to communicate with others and access online commerce and public and financial services.xv Digital literacy also encompasses important security skills, such as protecting privacy, minimising the digital trail left on social media and elsewhere and distinguishing between fact and misinformation.<br>\nWithout digital literacy, many people are unable to use digital technologies. This predominantly impacts women, people with no or little level of education, the elderly and low-income groups. The lack of digital literacy among vulnerable and marginalised groups is a missed opportunity for digital companies. It is in companies’ interest to support programmes that build the digital skills of these potential customers.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses a programme that actively contributes to improve the digital skills of vulnerable groups so that they can become proficient in carrying out fundamental digital tasks such as using a keyboard or touchscreen, managing privacy settings, sending emails, searching the web, etc. The scope of this element includes interventions that address basic digital skills needs, security skills, such as protecting privacy, minimising the digital trail left on social media and elsewhere and distinguishing between fact and misinformation, as well as digital technology skills for primary or middleschool-aged children (e.g. robotics, AI, coding). To meet the requirements of this element, the programme must be explicitly designed to serve vulnerable groups, such as children, youth, women, older persons, rural, persons with disabilities, migrants, refugees, indigenous people, people living in poverty, LGBTQIA+ people, people of African descent, Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities. The company must demonstrate that the programme is part of a strategic effort and aligns with the company‚s core business, social investment strategy or long-term sustainability goals. In addition, the company must collaborate with relevant partners‚Äîsuch as NGOs, community groups, government bodies, or other companies‚Äîin the implementation or scaling of the programme. The nature of collaboration should be described. To be considered, the programme must have been running in the reporting period of interest of the assessment in question.<br>\nNote: programmes from the company‚s Foundation are accepted. If this element is not met, elements c to e can‚t be met.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Digital_Literacy_Programme_for_Vulnerable_Groups+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449006,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sustained Approach to Digital Literacy for Vulnerable Groups",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustained_Approach_to_Digital_Literacy_for_Vulnerable_Groups.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sustained Approach to Digital Literacy for Vulnerable Groups",
      "question": "Does the company demonstrate a sustained approach to support digital literacy for vulnerable groups?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Digital literacy covers the proficiencies needed to carry out fundamental digital tasks, such as using a computer keyboard or smartphone touchscreen, managing privacy settings, sending emails, searching the web or filling out an online form. These skills allow users to communicate with others and access online commerce and public and financial services.xv Digital literacy also encompasses important security skills, such as protecting privacy, minimising the digital trail left on social media and elsewhere and distinguishing between fact and misinformation.<br>\nWithout digital literacy, many people are unable to use digital technologies. This predominantly impacts women, people with no or little level of education, the elderly and low-income groups. The lack of digital literacy among vulnerable and marginalised groups is a missed opportunity for digital companies. It is in companies’ interest to support programmes that build the digital skills of these potential customers.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company provides evidence of commitment to digital literacy for vulnerable groups through long-term investments, continued programme delivery, and/or institutional mechanisms that ensure continuity and scale over time. To meet this element, the company must provide evidence of one or more of the following:<br>\n- evidence that digital literacy is not treated as a short-term commitment or ad hoc issue, but rather as a core area of sustained social investment;<br>\n- evidence of having more than one programme running to support digital literacy; <br>\n- evidence of a multi-year roadmap and dedicated multi-year funding for supporting digital literacy for vulnerable groups.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustained_Approach_to_Digital_Literacy_for_Vulnerable_Groups+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449018,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Goal Disclosure: Digital Literacy for Vulnerable Groups",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Goal_Disclosure_Digital_Literacy_for_Vulnerable_Groups.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Goal Disclosure: Digital Literacy for Vulnerable Groups",
      "question": "Does the company disclose information on the goal for its programme to support digital literacy development for vulnerable groups?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Digital literacy covers the proficiencies needed to carry out fundamental digital tasks, such as using a computer keyboard or smartphone touchscreen, managing privacy settings, sending emails, searching the web or filling out an online form. These skills allow users to communicate with others and access online commerce and public and financial services.xv Digital literacy also encompasses important security skills, such as protecting privacy, minimising the digital trail left on social media and elsewhere and distinguishing between fact and misinformation.<br>\nWithout digital literacy, many people are unable to use digital technologies. This predominantly impacts women, people with no or little level of education, the elderly and low-income groups. The lack of digital literacy among vulnerable and marginalised groups is a missed opportunity for digital companies. It is in companies’ interest to support programmes that build the digital skills of these potential customers.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses the goal or intended impact of its programme that contributes to digital literacy, demonstrating a clear understanding of the issue being addressed and how its activities contribute to a meaningful solution for the impact individuals/communities. To meet the requirements of this element, the company must disclose one or more of the following: <br>\n- The company states the specific objective(s) of its programme. Objectives should be specific and clearly aligned with the programme‚s activities and the needs of vulnerable groups;<br>\n- The company discloses the anticipated results of the programme, which gives an indication of how success will be measured qualitatively or quantitatively over time; <br>\n- The company sets concrete targets** **for the programme, either for the short- or long-term.<br>\nGeneral statements of support or purpose without specific objectives, outcomes, or targets will not meet the requirements of this element.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Goal_Disclosure_Digital_Literacy_for_Vulnerable_Groups+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449030,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Input/Output Metrics: Digital Literacy for Vulnerable Groups",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Input_Output_Metrics_Digital_Literacy_for_Vulnerable_Groups.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Input/Output Metrics: Digital Literacy for Vulnerable Groups",
      "question": "Does the company report input or output metrics for its programme to support digital literacy development for vulnerable groups?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Digital literacy covers the proficiencies needed to carry out fundamental digital tasks, such as using a computer keyboard or smartphone touchscreen, managing privacy settings, sending emails, searching the web or filling out an online form. These skills allow users to communicate with others and access online commerce and public and financial services.xv Digital literacy also encompasses important security skills, such as protecting privacy, minimising the digital trail left on social media and elsewhere and distinguishing between fact and misinformation.<br>\nWithout digital literacy, many people are unable to use digital technologies. This predominantly impacts women, people with no or little level of education, the elderly and low-income groups. The lack of digital literacy among vulnerable and marginalised groups is a missed opportunity for digital companies. It is in companies’ interest to support programmes that build the digital skills of these potential customers.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe companydisclosesinformation on the resources invested in its digitalliteracyprogramme,the activities delivered,as well as the immediate results or reach of the programme. This includesbut not limited toinformation on how much money was allocated, donated, or invested in the programme; metrics related to personnel involvement, such as number of volunteer hours, number of employees deployed, or time allocated tothe specificprogramme development or delivery; disclosures of material, technology, or infrastructure provided; participation, satisfaction or engagement metrics, number of people directly reached or supported, number of organisations supported. A company‚s reporting of aggregated metrics for all their digital inclusion efforts is not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Input_Output_Metrics_Digital_Literacy_for_Vulnerable_Groups+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449042,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Progress or Impact of Digital Literacy Programme",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Progress_or_Impact_of_Digital_Literacy_Programme.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Progress or Impact of Digital Literacy Programme",
      "question": "Does the company demonstrate the progress or impact of its programme?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Digital literacy covers the proficiencies needed to carry out fundamental digital tasks, such as using a computer keyboard or smartphone touchscreen, managing privacy settings, sending emails, searching the web or filling out an online form. These skills allow users to communicate with others and access online commerce and public and financial services.xv Digital literacy also encompasses important security skills, such as protecting privacy, minimising the digital trail left on social media and elsewhere and distinguishing between fact and misinformation.<br>\nWithout digital literacy, many people are unable to use digital technologies. This predominantly impacts women, people with no or little level of education, the elderly and low-income groups. The lack of digital literacy among vulnerable and marginalised groups is a missed opportunity for digital companies. It is in companies’ interest to support programmes that build the digital skills of these potential customers.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company provides evidenceof the changes that happen tovulnerable groups, organisationssupported,the company employees,or company businessas a result ofthe digital literacyprogramme..The company maydiscloseone or more of the following:<br>\n- Evidence oftheprogressmade toward the programme‚sstatedgoals or targets. This may include interim updates showing how the programme is tracking against milestones across time, coverage goals, or other indicators of planned progress.<br>\n- Evidence of outcome or impact data, comparing results to a baseline measurement taken before the programme began.<br>\n- Findings of internal or external monitoring efforts, including: the methods used (e.g. surveys, interviews, usage data, case studies), sources of data,limitationsor context for interpreting the results.<br>\nIn best-case disclosures, the company may provide results from a third-party evaluation, such as an impact assessment comparing with a control group or other inferential methods, which enhances the credibility and robustness of the data",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Progress_or_Impact_of_Digital_Literacy_Programme+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449054,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Digital Literacy Programme Targeting Women and Girls",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Digital_Literacy_Programme_Targeting_Women_and_Girls.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Digital Literacy Programme Targeting Women and Girls",
      "question": "Does the company have a digital literacy programme that is intended specifically for women and girls, with clear targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Digital literacy covers the proficiencies needed to carry out fundamental digital tasks, such as using a computer keyboard or smartphone touchscreen, managing privacy settings, sending emails, searching the web or filling out an online form. These skills allow users to communicate with others and access online commerce and public and financial services.xv Digital literacy also encompasses important security skills, such as protecting privacy, minimising the digital trail left on social media and elsewhere and distinguishing between fact and misinformation.<br>\nWithout digital literacy, many people are unable to use digital technologies. This predominantly impacts women, people with no or little level of education, the elderly and low-income groups. The lack of digital literacy among vulnerable and marginalised groups is a missed opportunity for digital companies. It is in companies’ interest to support programmes that build the digital skills of these potential customers.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses a programme that contributes to digital literacy that is explicitly designed to address the needs of women and/or girls. This element assesses whether the company is taking intentional and targeted action to address gender-based digital inequality when it comes to digital literacy.<br>\nGeneral programmes that incidentally include women and girls are not sufficient to meet this element.<br>\nThe programme or initiative must beoperatedby the company or have company‚s support in the form of funding (e.g. grant, donation). Evidence shall include a description of the programme.To be considered, the programme must have been running in the reporting period of interest of the assessment in question.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Digital_Literacy_Programme_Targeting_Women_and_Girls+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449066,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Digital Skills Programme for Employability or Entrepreneurship",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Digital_Skills_Programme_for_Employability_or_Entrepreneurship.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Digital Skills Programme for Employability or Entrepreneurship",
      "question": "Does the company have a programme that supports digital skills development for employability or entrepreneurship?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "SDG target 4.4 aims to ‘substantially increase the number of youth and adults who have relevant skills, including technical and vocational skills, for employment, decent jobs and entrepreneurship.’ As digital technology permeates all sectors, digital skills have become essential for general employability and entrepreneurship.<br>\nAdditional digital skills beyond digital literacy are important for people's livelihoods. Such digital skills include web design, desktop publishing and digital marketing, which prepare students for jobs in these areas or help entrepreneurs use these tools to publicise and grow their business. They also include technical digital skills that are needed to become a specialist in digital professions, such as data analysis, hardware design, network management and software programming. There is a large technological skills gap across gender and income and between high-income and low- and middle- income countries.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe companydisclosesa programme that actively contributes topromote digital skills needed to stay relevant in the digital transformation and improve people‚s livelihoods, particularly around employment and entrepreneurship opportunities. These skills include developing digital content,integrating and re-elaborating digital content, copyright and licences, above-basic programming skills, solving technical problems (with a device, software or connectivity), identifying needs and technological responses, creatively using digital technologies, identifying digital competence gaps, computational thinking, operating specialized digital technologies for a particular field, interpreting and manipulating data, information and digital content for a particular field.To meet the requirements of this element, the programme must be explicitly designed to serveat least women, workers, unemployedpeopleor youth.The company mustdemonstratethat the programme is part of a strategic effort and aligns with the company‚s core business, social investmentstrategyor long-term sustainability goals. In addition, the company must collaborate with relevant partners‚Äîsuch as NGOs, community groups, government bodies, or other companies‚Äîin the implementation or scaling of the programme.The nature of collaboration should be described.To be considered, the programme must have been running in the reporting period of interest of the assessment in question.<br>\n<br>\nNote: programmes from the company‚s Foundation are accepted. If this element is not met, elements c to ecan‚tbe met.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Digital_Skills_Programme_for_Employability_or_Entrepreneurship+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449078,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sustained Approach to Digital Skills for Employability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustained_Approach_to_Digital_Skills_for_Employability.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sustained Approach to Digital Skills for Employability",
      "question": "Does the company demonstrate a sustained approach to support digital skills development for employability or entrepreneurship?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "SDG target 4.4 aims to ‘substantially increase the number of youth and adults who have relevant skills, including technical and vocational skills, for employment, decent jobs and entrepreneurship.’ As digital technology permeates all sectors, digital skills have become essential for general employability and entrepreneurship.<br>\nAdditional digital skills beyond digital literacy are important for people's livelihoods. Such digital skills include web design, desktop publishing and digital marketing, which prepare students for jobs in these areas or help entrepreneurs use these tools to publicise and grow their business. They also include technical digital skills that are needed to become a specialist in digital professions, such as data analysis, hardware design, network management and software programming. There is a large technological skills gap across gender and income and between high-income and low- and middle- income countries.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company provides evidence of commitment to digitalskills developmentthrough long-term investments, continued programme delivery, and/or institutional mechanisms that ensure continuity and scale over time. To meet this element, the company must provide evidence of one or more of the following:<br>\n- evidence that digitalskills developmentis not treated as a short-term commitment or ad hoc issue, but rather as a core area of sustained socialinvestment;<br>\n- Evidence of having more than one programme running to support digitalskillsdevelopment;<br>\n- Evidence of a multi-year roadmap and dedicated multi-year funding for supporting digitalskillsdevelopment for women, workers, unemployedpeopleor youth.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustained_Approach_to_Digital_Skills_for_Employability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449090,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Goal Disclosure: Digital Skills for Employability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Goal_Disclosure_Digital_Skills_for_Employability.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Goal Disclosure: Digital Skills for Employability",
      "question": "Does the company disclose information on the goal for its programme to support digital skills development for employability or entrepreneurship?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "SDG target 4.4 aims to ‘substantially increase the number of youth and adults who have relevant skills, including technical and vocational skills, for employment, decent jobs and entrepreneurship.’ As digital technology permeates all sectors, digital skills have become essential for general employability and entrepreneurship.<br>\nAdditional digital skills beyond digital literacy are important for people's livelihoods. Such digital skills include web design, desktop publishing and digital marketing, which prepare students for jobs in these areas or help entrepreneurs use these tools to publicise and grow their business. They also include technical digital skills that are needed to become a specialist in digital professions, such as data analysis, hardware design, network management and software programming. There is a large technological skills gap across gender and income and between high-income and low- and middle- income countries.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe companydisclosesthe goal or intended impact of its programme that contributes to digitaldigitalskills development,demonstratinga clear understanding of the issue being addressed and how its activities contribute to a meaningful solution for the impact individuals/communities. To meet the requirements of this element, the company mustdiscloseone or more of the following:<br>\n- The companystatesthe specificobjective(s)of its programme. Objectives should be specific and clearly aligned with the programme‚s activities and the needs ofwomen, workers, unemployedpeopleor youth<br>\n- The companydisclosestheanticipatedresults of the programme, which givesan indicationof how success will be measured qualitatively or quantitatively overtime;<br>\n- The company sets concrete targets****for the programme, either for the short- or long-term.<br>\nGeneral statements of support or purpose without specificobjectives, outcomes, or targets will not meet the requirements of this element.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Goal_Disclosure_Digital_Skills_for_Employability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449102,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Input/Output Metrics: Digital Skills for Employability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Input_Output_Metrics_Digital_Skills_for_Employability.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Input/Output Metrics: Digital Skills for Employability",
      "question": "Does the company report input or output metrics for its programme to support digital skills development for employability or entrepreneurship?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "SDG target 4.4 aims to ‘substantially increase the number of youth and adults who have relevant skills, including technical and vocational skills, for employment, decent jobs and entrepreneurship.’ As digital technology permeates all sectors, digital skills have become essential for general employability and entrepreneurship.<br>\nAdditional digital skills beyond digital literacy are important for people's livelihoods. Such digital skills include web design, desktop publishing and digital marketing, which prepare students for jobs in these areas or help entrepreneurs use these tools to publicise and grow their business. They also include technical digital skills that are needed to become a specialist in digital professions, such as data analysis, hardware design, network management and software programming. There is a large technological skills gap across gender and income and between high-income and low- and middle- income countries.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe companydisclosesinformation on the resources invested in its digitalskills developmentprogramme,the activities,as well as the immediate results or reach of the programme. This includesbut not limited toinformation on how much money was allocated, donated, or invested in the programme; metrics related to personnel involvement, such as number ofvolunteer hours, number of employees deployed, or time allocated tothe specificprogramme development or delivery; disclosures of material, technology, or infrastructure provided; participation, satisfaction or engagement metrics, number of people directly reached or supported, number of organisations supported. A company‚s reporting of aggregated metrics for all their digital inclusion efforts is not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Input_Output_Metrics_Digital_Skills_for_Employability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449114,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Progress or Impact of Digital Skills Programme",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Progress_or_Impact_of_Digital_Skills_Programme.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Progress or Impact of Digital Skills Programme",
      "question": "Does the company demonstrate the progress or impact of its programme?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "SDG target 4.4 aims to ‘substantially increase the number of youth and adults who have relevant skills, including technical and vocational skills, for employment, decent jobs and entrepreneurship.’ As digital technology permeates all sectors, digital skills have become essential for general employability and entrepreneurship.<br>\nAdditional digital skills beyond digital literacy are important for people's livelihoods. Such digital skills include web design, desktop publishing and digital marketing, which prepare students for jobs in these areas or help entrepreneurs use these tools to publicise and grow their business. They also include technical digital skills that are needed to become a specialist in digital professions, such as data analysis, hardware design, network management and software programming. There is a large technological skills gap across gender and income and between high-income and low- and middle- income countries.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company provides evidenceof the changes that happen tovulnerable groups, organisationssupported,the company employees,or company businessas a result ofthe digital skillsprogramme..The company maydiscloseone or more of the following:<br>\n- Evidence oftheprogressmade toward the programme‚sstatedgoals or targets. This may include interim updates showing how the programme is tracking against milestones across time, coverage goals, or other indicators of planned progress.<br>\n- Evidence of outcome or impact data, comparing results to a baseline measurement taken before the programme began.<br>\n- Findings of internal or external monitoring efforts, including: the methods used (e.g. surveys, interviews, usage data, case studies), sources of data,limitationsor context for interpreting the results.<br>\nIn best-case disclosures, the company may provide results from a third-party evaluation, such as an impact assessment comparing with a control group or other inferential methods, which enhances the credibility and robustness of the data.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Progress_or_Impact_of_Digital_Skills_Programme+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449126,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Skills Gap Identification for Workers Affected by Technological Change",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Skills_Gap_Identification_for_Workers_Affected_by_Technological_Change.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Skills Gap Identification for Workers Affected by Technological Change",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its process(es) for identifying skills gaps for workers affected by technological change, digitalisation or automation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The digital skills gap among workers is a growing concern. Technological change, digitalisation and automation are creating changes in jobs, requiring workers to adapt continuously to use evolving digital tools. Digital literacy and upskilling are critical, as articulated in global frameworks like the Global Digital Compactxvii and UN definition of digital inclusionxviii, to ensure workers can effectively adapt to and benefit from digital advancements. The World Economic Forum and McKinsey highlight the transformative impact of technological disruption on jobs, stressing the urgency for corporate-driven upskilling and reskilling initiatives. By integrating workforce development into their strategies, digital technology companies address economic disparity, safeguard employee futures, and align workforce capabilities with evolving business needs. This approach is also an opportunity for inclusive growth and innovation.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nBy havingaprocess toidentifyskills gapthe companydemonstratesitscommitment to future-proofing its workforce and ensuring a just and inclusive transition as technologies evolve.Evidenceof the processcanbethe use of assessment tools and analytics to systematically identify existing or emerging skills gaps amongthe company‚sworkforce; worker consultation to gather insights into perceived skills needs and challenges; collaboration with external partners to identify skills gaps or forecast future skills needs linked to technological change; disclosure of structured pathways for addressing identified skills gaps.Descriptions of general workforce development efforts without a specific focus on skills gap identification in relation to technological change, digitalisation or automationare not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Skills_Gap_Identification_for_Workers_Affected_by_Technological_Change+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449138,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Programme to Mitigate Impact of Technological Change on Workforce",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Programme_to_Mitigate_Impact_of_Technological_Change_on_Workforce.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Programme to Mitigate Impact of Technological Change on Workforce",
      "question": "Does the company have a programme(s) for mitigating the impact of technological change, digitalisation or automation on their workforce?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The digital skills gap among workers is a growing concern. Technological change, digitalisation and automation are creating changes in jobs, requiring workers to adapt continuously to use evolving digital tools. Digital literacy and upskilling are critical, as articulated in global frameworks like the Global Digital Compactxvii and UN definition of digital inclusionxviii, to ensure workers can effectively adapt to and benefit from digital advancements. The World Economic Forum and McKinsey highlight the transformative impact of technological disruption on jobs, stressing the urgency for corporate-driven upskilling and reskilling initiatives. By integrating workforce development into their strategies, digital technology companies address economic disparity, safeguard employee futures, and align workforce capabilities with evolving business needs. This approach is also an opportunity for inclusive growth and innovation.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company supports its workforce in adapting to emerging technologies, ensuring employees remain agile and future-ready in the face of digital transformation. The company discloses an initiative implemented during the reporting period that is aimed at mitigating the impact of technological disruption. The focus is on initiatives for upskilling, reskilling, job redesign, or other measures that help workers adapt to changes driven by technological change. This includes but not limited to training on new technologies, digital skills, AI, coding, cloud computing. Programmes implemented at either the group level or for a specific location or subsidiary are acceptable, recognising that needs may vary by geography. General employee development programmes that do not explicitly focus on these transformations will not be considered sufficient.<br>\nCompanies shall state that the initiative supports digital transformation, addresses future challenges, or enables adaptation to emerging technologies.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Programme_to_Mitigate_Impact_of_Technological_Change_on_Workforce+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449150,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Input/Output Metrics: Workforce Technological Change Programme",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Input_Output_Metrics_Workforce_Technological_Change_Programme.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Input/Output Metrics: Workforce Technological Change Programme",
      "question": "Does the company report input or output metrics for the programme(s)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The digital skills gap among workers is a growing concern. Technological change, digitalisation and automation are creating changes in jobs, requiring workers to adapt continuously to use evolving digital tools. Digital literacy and upskilling are critical, as articulated in global frameworks like the Global Digital Compactxvii and UN definition of digital inclusionxviii, to ensure workers can effectively adapt to and benefit from digital advancements. The World Economic Forum and McKinsey highlight the transformative impact of technological disruption on jobs, stressing the urgency for corporate-driven upskilling and reskilling initiatives. By integrating workforce development into their strategies, digital technology companies address economic disparity, safeguard employee futures, and align workforce capabilities with evolving business needs. This approach is also an opportunity for inclusive growth and innovation.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe companyreportsquantitatively on the coverage or completion of its upskilling or reskilling programme(s)To meet thiselement,the company mustdiscloseat least one type of the following:<br>\n1\\. Average hours of training per employee per year (e.g., per GRI 404-1)<br>\n2\\. Number or proportion of employees that have completed upskilling programs<br>\n3\\. Total budget spent on trainingas a proportion of overall budget<br>\n4\\. Per capita training budget<br>\n5\\. Other",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Input_Output_Metrics_Workforce_Technological_Change_Programme+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449162,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Annual Workforce Redundancy Rate Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Annual_Workforce_Redundancy_Rate_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Annual Workforce Redundancy Rate Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company report the proportion of its workforce that is made redundant annually?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The digital skills gap among workers is a growing concern. Technological change, digitalisation and automation are creating changes in jobs, requiring workers to adapt continuously to use evolving digital tools. Digital literacy and upskilling are critical, as articulated in global frameworks like the Global Digital Compactxvii and UN definition of digital inclusionxviii, to ensure workers can effectively adapt to and benefit from digital advancements. The World Economic Forum and McKinsey highlight the transformative impact of technological disruption on jobs, stressing the urgency for corporate-driven upskilling and reskilling initiatives. By integrating workforce development into their strategies, digital technology companies address economic disparity, safeguard employee futures, and align workforce capabilities with evolving business needs. This approach is also an opportunity for inclusive growth and innovation.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company reports the number or share of employees that have been laid off during the reporting year.<br>\nThe company can either report the rate of redundancy, the involuntary turnover rate, the number of severance packages, or other similar metrics.<br>\nThe voluntary turnover rate alone is not accepted, as it captures resignations and retirements rather than job losses due to transitions. However, if the company reports both the total turnover rate and the voluntary turnover rate, this is sufficient as the involuntary turnover rate is implied.<br>\nIt is not necessary to cite the reason for dismissal (e.g. automation, plant closure), though this is noted as best practice.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Annual_Workforce_Redundancy_Rate_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449174,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Cybersecurity Policy Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Cybersecurity_Policy_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Cybersecurity Policy Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company have a policy commitment to maintain cybersecurity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Cybersecurity threats discourage Internet use as they give rise to fears about online safety. Digital companies are at particular risk as the digital industry is one of the most targeted by cybercriminals.xix Yet, companies often do not assign sufficient high-level accountability for cybersecurity. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission requires public companies to disclose cybersecurity risks and incidents.xx Companies need to assure stakeholders that they take cybersecurity seriously and assign high-level accountability and resources to maintaining it.<br>\nSenior-level oversight of cybersecurity can serve to indicate that the company dedicates appropriate accountability, managerial capacity and resources to preventing, mitigating and resolving cybersecurity risks.xxi If companies are proactive about cybersecurity, digital inclusion will improve because users will feel safer using digital technologies.<br>\nRapid response to information security incidents is essential. Companies have created special units (e.g. computer emergency response team, computer security incident response team) to protect, detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents. As cyber threats often extend across borders, global cooperation is essential. The Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams, with over 500 members, fosters global ‘cooperation and coordination in incident prevention, to stimulate rapid reaction to incidents, and to promote information sharing among members and the community at large’.xxii<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nCybersecurity refers to the safeguarding of digital assets and infrastructure from cyberattacks, and it is distinct from,but mayinclude,data privacy.<br>\nThe company mustdisclosea formal statement approved at the highest level (e.g. board of directors, executive leadership) that includes specific commitment(s)to cybersecurity. A generic or high-level mention of security or privacy is not sufficient.The statement must explicitly mention ‚cybersecurity‚,‚information security‚,or recognized synonyms.The statementmustdefinewhat is covered(e.g. systems, personnel, third parties, data, users) anddistinguishcybersecurity from general IT or data protection.<br>\nThis element requires a company to make a commitment in aformalpublicly disclosedgovernance document such as standalone cybersecurity policy, code of conduct, corporate governance statement, business principles, dedicated webpage. WBA does not accept a commitment found in a report (e.g. an annual or sustainability report that is updated annually) even if the company explains that it is company policy and/or it is approved by the highest governing body. This requires the company to make a commitment using strong languagesuch as, but not limited to‚We respect‚,‚We commit to respect‚,‚We adhere to‚,‚We uphold‚,‚We are committed to‚.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Cybersecurity_Policy_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449186,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Senior-Level Accountability for Cybersecurity",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Senior_Level_Accountability_for_Cybersecurity.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Senior-Level Accountability for Cybersecurity",
      "question": "Does the company assign accountability for cybersecurity at the senior level?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Cybersecurity threats discourage Internet use as they give rise to fears about online safety. Digital companies are at particular risk as the digital industry is one of the most targeted by cybercriminals.xix Yet, companies often do not assign sufficient high-level accountability for cybersecurity. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission requires public companies to disclose cybersecurity risks and incidents.xx Companies need to assure stakeholders that they take cybersecurity seriously and assign high-level accountability and resources to maintaining it.<br>\nSenior-level oversight of cybersecurity can serve to indicate that the company dedicates appropriate accountability, managerial capacity and resources to preventing, mitigating and resolving cybersecurity risks.xxi If companies are proactive about cybersecurity, digital inclusion will improve because users will feel safer using digital technologies.<br>\nRapid response to information security incidents is essential. Companies have created special units (e.g. computer emergency response team, computer security incident response team) to protect, detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents. As cyber threats often extend across borders, global cooperation is essential. The Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams, with over 500 members, fosters global ‘cooperation and coordination in incident prevention, to stimulate rapid reaction to incidents, and to promote information sharing among members and the community at large’.xxii<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe companydisclosesthe designation of a specific individual who holds formal and direct responsibility for cybersecurity governance. Accepted titlesinclude, butare not limited to: Chief information Security Officer (CISO), Chief Information Officer (CIO), Chief Security Officer (CSO), Global Head of Cybersecurity, Global Cybersecurity Officer, Vice President of Information Security, General Manager of Information Security. The individual must be accountable for cybersecurity across the group level. Disclosing only a subsidiary-level or business unit-specific cybersecurity officer does not meet the requirements.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Senior_Level_Accountability_for_Cybersecurity+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449198,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Cybersecurity Committee",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Cybersecurity_Committee.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Cybersecurity Committee",
      "question": "Does the company have a committee with clear responsibility for cybersecurity?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Cybersecurity threats discourage Internet use as they give rise to fears about online safety. Digital companies are at particular risk as the digital industry is one of the most targeted by cybercriminals.xix Yet, companies often do not assign sufficient high-level accountability for cybersecurity. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission requires public companies to disclose cybersecurity risks and incidents.xx Companies need to assure stakeholders that they take cybersecurity seriously and assign high-level accountability and resources to maintaining it.<br>\nSenior-level oversight of cybersecurity can serve to indicate that the company dedicates appropriate accountability, managerial capacity and resources to preventing, mitigating and resolving cybersecurity risks.xxi If companies are proactive about cybersecurity, digital inclusion will improve because users will feel safer using digital technologies.<br>\nRapid response to information security incidents is essential. Companies have created special units (e.g. computer emergency response team, computer security incident response team) to protect, detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents. As cyber threats often extend across borders, global cooperation is essential. The Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams, with over 500 members, fosters global ‘cooperation and coordination in incident prevention, to stimulate rapid reaction to incidents, and to promote information sharing among members and the community at large’.xxii<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company has a permanent committee (standing oroperating) that addresses cybersecurity as part of its formal mandate. The committee‚s responsibilities must explicitly cover cybersecurity, information security, and/or data security. The committee must report directly to the Board of Directors, a Board committee, or an equivalent governing body. Ad-hoc committees, task forces, or advisory councils that are temporary or informal are not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Cybersecurity_Committee+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449210,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Cybersecurity Management Documentation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Cybersecurity_Management_Documentation.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Cybersecurity Management Documentation",
      "question": "Does the company have a document that details how cybersecurity is managed within the organisation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Cybersecurity threats discourage Internet use as they give rise to fears about online safety. Digital companies are at particular risk as the digital industry is one of the most targeted by cybercriminals.xix Yet, companies often do not assign sufficient high-level accountability for cybersecurity. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission requires public companies to disclose cybersecurity risks and incidents.xx Companies need to assure stakeholders that they take cybersecurity seriously and assign high-level accountability and resources to maintaining it.<br>\nSenior-level oversight of cybersecurity can serve to indicate that the company dedicates appropriate accountability, managerial capacity and resources to preventing, mitigating and resolving cybersecurity risks.xxi If companies are proactive about cybersecurity, digital inclusion will improve because users will feel safer using digital technologies.<br>\nRapid response to information security incidents is essential. Companies have created special units (e.g. computer emergency response team, computer security incident response team) to protect, detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents. As cyber threats often extend across borders, global cooperation is essential. The Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams, with over 500 members, fosters global ‘cooperation and coordination in incident prevention, to stimulate rapid reaction to incidents, and to promote information sharing among members and the community at large’.xxii<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe companydisclosesa document(s) or an equivalent webpage(s) that explains how cybersecurity is managed within the organisation. The company must provide a structured and operationally specific description of its cybersecurity management processes, not just a general statement of intent.<br>\nFor this element to be met, the company should:1) explain how the company identifies vulnerabilities in its information systems that may pose a data security risk;2) describe the company's operational response to identified cybersecurity risksand vulnerabilities,such asoperational procedures, management processes, product structures, business partner selection, employee training, and use of technology.<br>\nThe document should show a systematic and proactive cybersecurity management approach, rather than isolated measures. The focus must be on the company‚s internal cybersecurity management, not customer-facing product security.<br>\nThe company mustdisclosethat it has a process for protecting the following from cyber threats: data (e.g. internal, customer, or partner data), information systems (e.g. IT networks, infrastructure, applications), users (e.g. employees, customers, or third-party users interacting with the company‚s digital systems)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Cybersecurity_Management_Documentation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449222,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Security Response Team",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Security_Response_Team.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Security Response Team",
      "question": "Does the company have a security response team?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Cybersecurity threats discourage Internet use as they give rise to fears about online safety. Digital companies are at particular risk as the digital industry is one of the most targeted by cybercriminals.xix Yet, companies often do not assign sufficient high-level accountability for cybersecurity. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission requires public companies to disclose cybersecurity risks and incidents.xx Companies need to assure stakeholders that they take cybersecurity seriously and assign high-level accountability and resources to maintaining it.<br>\nSenior-level oversight of cybersecurity can serve to indicate that the company dedicates appropriate accountability, managerial capacity and resources to preventing, mitigating and resolving cybersecurity risks.xxi If companies are proactive about cybersecurity, digital inclusion will improve because users will feel safer using digital technologies.<br>\nRapid response to information security incidents is essential. Companies have created special units (e.g. computer emergency response team, computer security incident response team) to protect, detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents. As cyber threats often extend across borders, global cooperation is essential. The Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams, with over 500 members, fosters global ‘cooperation and coordination in incident prevention, to stimulate rapid reaction to incidents, and to promote information sharing among members and the community at large’.xxii<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company has an established security incident response team responsible for managing cybersecurity incidents that may affect the organisation. The company must disclose the existence of a formal security response team‚Äîsuch as a CERT (Computer Emergency Response Team), CSIRT (Computer Security Incident Response Team), PSIRT (Product Security Incident Response Team), or a functionally equivalent team. The team may exist at a business unit level, provided it carries out incident response for that part of the company. The team must address organization-wide cybersecurity threats, including internal systems, enterprise infrastructure, and supply chain vulnerabilities. A customer-only incident response team (e.g. one that responds only to customer data breaches or external-facing services) is not accepted. The presence of the word ‚response‚ and evidence of remediation capabilities are critical to assess this element.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Security_Response_Team+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449234,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+ISO/IEC 27001 Certification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+ISO_IEC_27001_Certification.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "ISO/IEC 27001 Certification",
      "question": "Does the company have a valid ISO/IEC 27001 certification?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Cybersecurity threats discourage Internet use as they give rise to fears about online safety. Digital companies are at particular risk as the digital industry is one of the most targeted by cybercriminals.xix Yet, companies often do not assign sufficient high-level accountability for cybersecurity. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission requires public companies to disclose cybersecurity risks and incidents.xx Companies need to assure stakeholders that they take cybersecurity seriously and assign high-level accountability and resources to maintaining it.<br>\nSenior-level oversight of cybersecurity can serve to indicate that the company dedicates appropriate accountability, managerial capacity and resources to preventing, mitigating and resolving cybersecurity risks.xxi If companies are proactive about cybersecurity, digital inclusion will improve because users will feel safer using digital technologies.<br>\nRapid response to information security incidents is essential. Companies have created special units (e.g. computer emergency response team, computer security incident response team) to protect, detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents. As cyber threats often extend across borders, global cooperation is essential. The Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams, with over 500 members, fosters global ‘cooperation and coordination in incident prevention, to stimulate rapid reaction to incidents, and to promote information sharing among members and the community at large’.xxii<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe companydisclosesthat it hasaISO/IEC 27001 certificate.Certificates from subsidiaries or business units are accepted.To be considered valid, the certificate must be current at the time of the assessed reportingperiod(ISO 27001 certifications typicallyremainvalid for three years).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+ISO_IEC_27001_Certification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449246,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Data Privacy as Material Topic",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Data_Privacy_as_Material_Topic.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Data Privacy as Material Topic",
      "question": "Does the company consider data privacy a key topic in its materiality analysis?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Companies routinely collect personal information on their clients and users. This data is used for various purposes, such as analytical insights, client contact and targeting paid advertisements. As custodians of personal data, companies play a critical role in ensuring the data is kept safe and not used for nefarious purposes.<br>\nProtection of personal data is a fundamental right linking to SDG target 16.10: ‘Protect fundamental freedoms.’ SDG target 16.10 calls for ‘public access to information’. In this regard, it is important for stakeholders to know about data breach incidents to better understand risk and how companies are dealing with it. Both the GRI and SASB global reporting frameworks recommend that companies should disclose the number of data breaches they experience.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company recognises data privacy as a strategic priority byidentifyingit as a key topic in its materiality analysis or through a high-level public policy statement that treats data privacy as a core business, ethicalvalueor human right. References to data privacy laws (e.g. GDPR) without connecting to strategic or stakeholder relevance are not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Data_Privacy_as_Material_Topic+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449258,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Group-Wide Privacy Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Group_Wide_Privacy_Policy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Group-Wide Privacy Policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a group-wide privacy policy with principles applicable to all subsidiaries and all locations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Companies routinely collect personal information on their clients and users. This data is used for various purposes, such as analytical insights, client contact and targeting paid advertisements. As custodians of personal data, companies play a critical role in ensuring the data is kept safe and not used for nefarious purposes.<br>\nProtection of personal data is a fundamental right linking to SDG target 16.10: ‘Protect fundamental freedoms.’ SDG target 16.10 calls for ‘public access to information’. In this regard, it is important for stakeholders to know about data breach incidents to better understand risk and how companies are dealing with it. Both the GRI and SASB global reporting frameworks recommend that companies should disclose the number of data breaches they experience.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe companydisclosesa group-wide privacy policy that sets out principles for how it collects, uses, processes, and protects personal data, and explicitlystatesthat these principles apply to all subsidiaries and all geographic locations where the companyoperates. The company must show evidence of a formal privacy policy or equivalent document (e.g. privacy strategy, data governance framework) that outlines how it manages personal information. The statement should apply at minimum to employees and customers and should cover all company‚s activities comprehensively and none should be excluded.<br>\nFor mobile operators, a privacy policy limited to their single country of operation is acceptable, provided it is clearly group-wide within that national context. Local legal provisions (e.g. GDPR in the EU or CCPA in California) may be acknowledged as enhancements to the global policy. These are acceptable only if they elevate protections, not if they reduce or fragment them.<br>\nTo meet this element, the company's statement mustbe found in a publicly available policy document or policy webpageandprovide evidence that user consent isrequiredto process user data.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Group_Wide_Privacy_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449270,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Government Data Request Transparency Report",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Government_Data_Request_Transparency_Report.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Government Data Request Transparency Report",
      "question": "Does the company publish a transparency report at least once a year in which it details the number of government demands for user information it has received by country and the number of requests it has complied with?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Companies routinely collect personal information on their clients and users. This data is used for various purposes, such as analytical insights, client contact and targeting paid advertisements. As custodians of personal data, companies play a critical role in ensuring the data is kept safe and not used for nefarious purposes.<br>\nProtection of personal data is a fundamental right linking to SDG target 16.10: ‘Protect fundamental freedoms.’ SDG target 16.10 calls for ‘public access to information’. In this regard, it is important for stakeholders to know about data breach incidents to better understand risk and how companies are dealing with it. Both the GRI and SASB global reporting frameworks recommend that companies should disclose the number of data breaches they experience.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company publishes a statement thatdiscloses1) the number ofgovernmentdemands for user data it has received by country, including from their home and foreign governments, as well as from law enforcement and courts, 2) the number ofgovernments demands it hascomplied with. If the company is legally prohibited from publishing certain country-level data, it must include a note explaining the countries involved and the legal or regulatory reason for non-disclosure. If a companyoperatesin only one country anddisclosesrequests received in that country only, it can still meet the criteria.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Government_Data_Request_Transparency_Report+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449282,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Customer Privacy Breach Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Customer_Privacy_Breach_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Customer Privacy Breach Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose information about breaches of customer privacy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Companies routinely collect personal information on their clients and users. This data is used for various purposes, such as analytical insights, client contact and targeting paid advertisements. As custodians of personal data, companies play a critical role in ensuring the data is kept safe and not used for nefarious purposes.<br>\nProtection of personal data is a fundamental right linking to SDG target 16.10: ‘Protect fundamental freedoms.’ SDG target 16.10 calls for ‘public access to information’. In this regard, it is important for stakeholders to know about data breach incidents to better understand risk and how companies are dealing with it. Both the GRI and SASB global reporting frameworks recommend that companies should disclose the number of data breaches they experience.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe companydiscloseswhether it has experienced breaches of customer privacy, including relevant details where applicable. To meet this element, the company must either report on breach incidents or clearlystatethat no breaches occurred during the reporting period.<br>\nThe company mustdisclosethe following three items: number of data breaches that occurred, number or percentage of those breaches that involved personal data, number of accounts or users affected by breach(es). Best practice alsoincludea process for responding to data breaches when discovered, including steps taken to notify users,containthe incident, and prevent recurrence.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Customer_Privacy_Breach_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449294,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Child Rights Protection Policy in Digital Environment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Child_Rights_Protection_Policy_in_Digital_Environment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Child Rights Protection Policy in Digital Environment",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a policy commitment to protect child rights in the digital environment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The rights of every child must be respected, protected and fulfilled in the digital environment, as set out in General Comment 25 by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. Globally, over 1 in 3 Internet users is a child, and yet, according to the UN International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF), children are at heightened risk of exploitation, data breaches and privacy violations online.<br>\nAs more children engage with digital technologies, they face specific risks, including exposure to harmful content, cyberbullying and the potential misuse of personal data. Companies that offer digital services, whether directly or through their value chains, must take an approach integrating safety-by- design and privacy-by-design to protect these vulnerable users by, for example, establishing robust policies, conducting risk assessments and ensuring transparent data handling practices.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThis element assesses whether the company has recognised its responsibility to respect and promote child rights, in line with international frameworks, and made this responsibility visible in a senior-level approved statement.<br>\nThe company must provide a publicly available statementapplicable at group levelthat1)refersspecifically to the rights of childrenin the digital environment, not just generic userprotectionsor data privacy, 2)is informed by international/regional/national instruments,frameworksand/or standards.<br>\nThe term ‚Äòstatement‚ is used to describe a wide range of forms a company may use to set out publicly its responsibilities,commitmentsand expectations. This may be a separate policy or commitments within other formal policies, or provisions within other documents that govern the company‚s approach, such as a company code, business principles, governance statements, human rightspolicyor risk assessment framework, etc.<br>\nA standalone child rights policy is notrequired‚Äî the commitment may be embedded in broader policies (e.g. human rights, ethics, governance) if it explicitly refers to protecting child rights in the digital environment.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Child_Rights_Protection_Policy_in_Digital_Environment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449306,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Grievance Mechanism for Child Rights in Digital Environment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Grievance_Mechanism_for_Child_Rights_in_Digital_Environment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism for Child Rights in Digital Environment",
      "question": "Does the company have a grievance mechanism that is focused on child rights in the digital environment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The rights of every child must be respected, protected and fulfilled in the digital environment, as set out in General Comment 25 by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. Globally, over 1 in 3 Internet users is a child, and yet, according to the UN International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF), children are at heightened risk of exploitation, data breaches and privacy violations online.<br>\nAs more children engage with digital technologies, they face specific risks, including exposure to harmful content, cyberbullying and the potential misuse of personal data. Companies that offer digital services, whether directly or through their value chains, must take an approach integrating safety-by- design and privacy-by-design to protect these vulnerable users by, for example, establishing robust policies, conducting risk assessments and ensuring transparent data handling practices.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe companyprovidesa grievance mechanism that allows stakeholders,including children, their families, or their representatives-toraise andreport concerns,complaintsor grievances about the impact of the company‚s operations or activities on the rightsor wellbeing of childrenthe digital environment.The companyhasaccessible, child-sensitive, and effective channel(s)/mechanism(s)  e.g. a webpage, phoneline, online portal, or by mail or email, or a combination, etc.) for raising complaints related to how its digital platforms, products, or services mayimpactchildren‚s rights.<br>\nThe company mustdemonstratethatthegrievance mechanism thatisdesigned to handle concerns related to children‚s digital rights, such as: online safety or wellbeing, privacy violations or intrusive data collection, exploitative content or commercial targeting, freedom of expression or opinion in digital spaces. The mechanism may be standalone or integrated into a broader human rights or ethics channel, provided that child-specific issues are explicitly included in its scope.The grievance mechanism can come from a 3rdparty, but it must be clear that the company partners with them.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Grievance_Mechanism_for_Child_Rights_in_Digital_Environment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449318,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Child Rights Impact Assessment in Digital Environment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Child_Rights_Impact_Assessment_in_Digital_Environment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Child Rights Impact Assessment in Digital Environment",
      "question": "Does the company carry out an impact assessment in relation to child rights in the digital environment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The rights of every child must be respected, protected and fulfilled in the digital environment, as set out in General Comment 25 by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. Globally, over 1 in 3 Internet users is a child, and yet, according to the UN International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF), children are at heightened risk of exploitation, data breaches and privacy violations online.<br>\nAs more children engage with digital technologies, they face specific risks, including exposure to harmful content, cyberbullying and the potential misuse of personal data. Companies that offer digital services, whether directly or through their value chains, must take an approach integrating safety-by- design and privacy-by-design to protect these vulnerable users by, for example, establishing robust policies, conducting risk assessments and ensuring transparent data handling practices.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe companydisclosesthat it conducts a child rights impact assessment (CRIA) or equivalent processtoidentifyand assess child rights risks andimpactsin the digital environment. The impact assessment must explicitly address child rights in the digital environment (or_child rights online_), including risks related to online safety and wellbeing, privacy and data protection for children, exposure to harmful content or manipulation, age-appropriate content and digital interactions, freedom of expression, thought, or access to information.The company should provide a publicdescription of its risk assessment process, explaining when and how the assessment is triggered, which child rights issues are considered, what steps are taken to mitigateidentifiedrisks.The company must assess risks in its own operations.<br>\nDisclosuremaydescribe how the company's products, services, and business activities impact children, regardless of whether the company's products and services are designed for use by children. Children may interact with digital products and services not designed for them (e.g., services are not designed for children but accessible to them, such as maps or smart home devices), and adult use of products and services mayimpactchildren (e.g., surveillance cameras, or sharing CSAM).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Child_Rights_Impact_Assessment_in_Digital_Environment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449330,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Educational Resources for Child Rights in Digital Environment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Educational_Resources_for_Child_Rights_in_Digital_Environment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Educational Resources for Child Rights in Digital Environment",
      "question": "Does the company provide educational tools/resources about the services or products it offers for protecting child rights in the digital environment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The rights of every child must be respected, protected and fulfilled in the digital environment, as set out in General Comment 25 by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. Globally, over 1 in 3 Internet users is a child, and yet, according to the UN International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF), children are at heightened risk of exploitation, data breaches and privacy violations online.<br>\nAs more children engage with digital technologies, they face specific risks, including exposure to harmful content, cyberbullying and the potential misuse of personal data. Companies that offer digital services, whether directly or through their value chains, must take an approach integrating safety-by- design and privacy-by-design to protect these vulnerable users by, for example, establishing robust policies, conducting risk assessments and ensuring transparent data handling practices.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company provides educational resources or tools aimed at supporting children, parents, and educators in the safe and responsible use of its digital products and services. The company provides user-facing resources that should directly help users understand how to navigate the company‚s services responsibly, particularly when children are involved.The resources should be practical and easy to understand(e.g. includingexamples, hypothetical situations, tips, advice), ideally available in multiple languages or in accessible formats (e.g. infographics, videos, simplified guides). Resources may be hosted by the company or offered via partnerships,as long asthey are clearly linked to the company‚s services.Generic disclosuresregardingchild rights in the digital environment are not considered for this element.Companiesthatdon‚tdirectly target end usersmayalso take initiatives to support education on the safe and responsible use of digital products and services.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Educational_Resources_for_Child_Rights_in_Digital_Environment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449342,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Responsible Handling of Children's Data",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_Handling_of_Children_s_Data.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Responsible Handling of Children's Data",
      "question": "Does the company handle children's data responsibly?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The rights of every child must be respected, protected and fulfilled in the digital environment, as set out in General Comment 25 by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. Globally, over 1 in 3 Internet users is a child, and yet, according to the UN International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF), children are at heightened risk of exploitation, data breaches and privacy violations online.<br>\nAs more children engage with digital technologies, they face specific risks, including exposure to harmful content, cyberbullying and the potential misuse of personal data. Companies that offer digital services, whether directly or through their value chains, must take an approach integrating safety-by- design and privacy-by-design to protect these vulnerable users by, for example, establishing robust policies, conducting risk assessments and ensuring transparent data handling practices.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company demonstrates a clear and responsible approach to handling children's personal data, in alignment with international child data protection principles. The company must request parental or guardian consent before collecting, storing, or processing any personal data from children below the digital age of consent (typically 13‚16 years, depending on jurisdiction).It must also state that it only collects children's data that is strictly necessary for the functioning of the service or platform (i.e. service-critical). Additionally, the company states that it commits to not share children's data with third parties (unless legally required or essential for service delivery), not use children's data for marketing purposes, not make children's data public.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_Handling_of_Children_s_Data+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449354,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Membership in International Standards Organisation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Membership_in_International_Standards_Organisation.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Membership in International Standards Organisation",
      "question": "Is the company a member of an international standards organisation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Open source has transformed the way software is developed and is driving innovation across the globe. Communities of dispersed developers are building on open source software to make it better and adaptable to new innovative uses. The Global Digital Compact and Pact for the Future emphasise the importance of digital public goods, including open source software, open data, open AI models and open standards, which empower societies and facilitate digital cooperation.<br>\nSupporting start-up ecosystems, particularly those led by vulnerable groups, also drives bottom-up innovation. Many digital companies have a dedicated venture capital fund. There is an opportunity for companies to channel some of that funding into promising start-ups whose founders are from vulnerable groups. Company support for incubators and affordable access to relevant products for start-ups can also help boost the tech ecosystem.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses that it is a member of an international standards organisation, such as the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Linux Foundation, or another recognised international standards body relevant to the digital sector. Membership must be at the company level. Individual participation or affiliations by employees, consultants, or contractors do not qualify. Subsidiary companies or regional offices can qualify if they are formally recognised as members by the standards organisation.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Membership_in_International_Standards_Organisation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449366,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Open Source or Standards Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Open_Source_or_Standards_Strategy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Open Source or Standards Strategy",
      "question": "Does the company have an open source/standards strategy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Open source has transformed the way software is developed and is driving innovation across the globe. Communities of dispersed developers are building on open source software to make it better and adaptable to new innovative uses. The Global Digital Compact and Pact for the Future emphasise the importance of digital public goods, including open source software, open data, open AI models and open standards, which empower societies and facilitate digital cooperation.<br>\nSupporting start-up ecosystems, particularly those led by vulnerable groups, also drives bottom-up innovation. Many digital companies have a dedicated venture capital fund. There is an opportunity for companies to channel some of that funding into promising start-ups whose founders are from vulnerable groups. Company support for incubators and affordable access to relevant products for start-ups can also help boost the tech ecosystem.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses a formal open source and/or open standards strategy, outlining how it uses, contributes to, publishes, and promotes open source technologies or standards. While many companies may document such strategies internally, public disclosure is strongly encouraged to support transparency and community accountability. The company must have a dedicated webpage or portal for its open-source and/or open-standards activities. The company lists or links to open-source projects it has created or contributes to. The company must provide a clear explanation of its approach to open-source and standards development. This may include policies on the use and contribution to open-source software by employees; the company may share internal tools, infrastructure, or support services for managing open-source engagement; the company may outlines key considerations for integrating open-source code into its own products (e.g., security checks, legal compliance, code review). Legal guidance or policies related to intellectual property, licensing, or software reuse may be disclosed.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Open_Source_or_Standards_Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449378,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Open Source or Standards Projects and Initiatives",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Open_Source_or_Standards_Projects_and_Initiatives.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Open Source or Standards Projects and Initiatives",
      "question": "Does the company have open source/standard projects and initiatives?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Open source has transformed the way software is developed and is driving innovation across the globe. Communities of dispersed developers are building on open source software to make it better and adaptable to new innovative uses. The Global Digital Compact and Pact for the Future emphasise the importance of digital public goods, including open source software, open data, open AI models and open standards, which empower societies and facilitate digital cooperation.<br>\nSupporting start-up ecosystems, particularly those led by vulnerable groups, also drives bottom-up innovation. Many digital companies have a dedicated venture capital fund. There is an opportunity for companies to channel some of that funding into promising start-ups whose founders are from vulnerable groups. Company support for incubators and affordable access to relevant products for start-ups can also help boost the tech ecosystem.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses one or more active (at the time of the assessment) open-source or open standards projects or initiatives that it has launched, contributed to, or is participating in. These initiatives may include open-source software, open data projects, open AI models, or involvement in the development or maintenance of open standards. The company must provide clear evidence of active participation in at least one open-source or standards-related project. The company must be an active contributor or maintainer—for instance, submitting code, managing repositories, developing documentation, or participating in governance. Projects that are no longer maintained or were discontinued before the time of the assessment are not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Open_Source_or_Standards_Projects_and_Initiatives+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449390,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Venture Capital Investment in Underrepresented Founders",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Venture_Capital_Investment_in_Underrepresented_Founders.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Venture Capital Investment in Underrepresented Founders",
      "question": "Does the company invest in start-ups founded by persons from underrepresented groups through its venture capital initiatives?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Open source has transformed the way software is developed and is driving innovation across the globe. Communities of dispersed developers are building on open source software to make it better and adaptable to new innovative uses. The Global Digital Compact and Pact for the Future emphasise the importance of digital public goods, including open source software, open data, open AI models and open standards, which empower societies and facilitate digital cooperation.<br>\nSupporting start-up ecosystems, particularly those led by vulnerable groups, also drives bottom-up innovation. Many digital companies have a dedicated venture capital fund. There is an opportunity for companies to channel some of that funding into promising start-ups whose founders are from vulnerable groups. Company support for incubators and affordable access to relevant products for start-ups can also help boost the tech ecosystem.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company must demonstrate that it operates or contributes to venture capital initiatives (either directly or through a dedicated investment arm) that focus on supporting start-ups led by founders from underrepresented groups. The initiative includes the allocation of equity or investment capital, and not other forms of support such as grants, technical assistance, mentorship, or training. The disclosure specifies the nature of the company‚s investment role (e.g. lead investor, limited partner in a diversity-focused fund, etc). General claims of support or partnerships without detail on the financial investment structure or targeted founder demographics are not sufficient. The initiative must be external-facing, focused on start-ups beyond the company‚s internal operations or employee-led ventures.<br>\nUnderrepresented groups include minoritized groups that face specific social, political, and economic barriers to employability and professional growth in digital sectors. For the purposes of this indicator, underrepresented groups are defined as individuals whose identities fall within one or more of the following categories:ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, and neurodiversity.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Venture_Capital_Investment_in_Underrepresented_Founders+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449402,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Programme Supporting Start-Ups from Underrepresented Groups",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Programme_Supporting_Start_Ups_from_Underrepresented_Groups.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Programme Supporting Start-Ups from Underrepresented Groups",
      "question": "Does the company have a specific programme for supporting start-ups founded by persons from underrepresented groups?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Open source has transformed the way software is developed and is driving innovation across the globe. Communities of dispersed developers are building on open source software to make it better and adaptable to new innovative uses. The Global Digital Compact and Pact for the Future emphasise the importance of digital public goods, including open source software, open data, open AI models and open standards, which empower societies and facilitate digital cooperation.<br>\nSupporting start-up ecosystems, particularly those led by vulnerable groups, also drives bottom-up innovation. Many digital companies have a dedicated venture capital fund. There is an opportunity for companies to channel some of that funding into promising start-ups whose founders are from vulnerable groups. Company support for incubators and affordable access to relevant products for start-ups can also help boost the tech ecosystem.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company provides evidence of a dedicated programme designed to support start-ups founded by individuals from underrepresented groups, such as women, racial and ethnic minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals, Indigenous peoples, persons with disabilities, etc. The company must operate or actively participate in an initiative that provides non-equity-based support to underrepresented start-up founders. The support can take various forms, including accelerator programmes, incubators, mentoring schemes, technical training, capacity building, co-working spaces, access to networks, or other forms of non-financial or grant-based assistance. The initiative must be clearly structured and targeted, with defined eligibility criteria that explicitly focus on start-ups led by individuals from underrepresented groups.<br>\nUnderrepresented groups include minoritized groups that face specific social, political, and economic barriers to employability and professional growth in digital sectors. For the purposes of this indicator, underrepresented groups are defined as individuals whose identities fall within one or more of the following categories:ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, and neurodiversity.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Programme_Supporting_Start_Ups_from_Underrepresented_Groups+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449414,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Support for Social or Non-Profit Enterprises",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Support_for_Social_or_Non_Profit_Enterprises.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Support for Social or Non-Profit Enterprises",
      "question": "Does the company provide support to social or non-profit enterprises?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Open source has transformed the way software is developed and is driving innovation across the globe. Communities of dispersed developers are building on open source software to make it better and adaptable to new innovative uses. The Global Digital Compact and Pact for the Future emphasise the importance of digital public goods, including open source software, open data, open AI models and open standards, which empower societies and facilitate digital cooperation.<br>\nSupporting start-up ecosystems, particularly those led by vulnerable groups, also drives bottom-up innovation. Many digital companies have a dedicated venture capital fund. There is an opportunity for companies to channel some of that funding into promising start-ups whose founders are from vulnerable groups. Company support for incubators and affordable access to relevant products for start-ups can also help boost the tech ecosystem.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company shows evidence of one or more programmes, partnerships, or initiatives that provide support to social or non-profit enterprises with a clearly defined social or environmental mission. This includes support for start-ups, NGOs,cooperativesor social businesses that are working to address challenges such as inequality, education, climate change,or other sustainabilityissues..Evidence should describe the intended social or environmental outcomes the support aims to achieve.<br>\nThe initiative should specificallydemonstratesupport to non-profit or social enterprises/start-ups thatoperatewith an explicit social or environmental mission. This may be reflected through alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) or reference to a defined sustainability challenge the initiativeseeksto address.<br>\nThe support provided must be distinct from activities already captured under measurement areas A or B, and the initiative must have been active during the reporting period of interest.<br>\nThe company should alsoindicatesome form of commitment - formal or informal - to supporting enterprises with a social or environmental mission,demonstratingongoing engagement in advancing positive social or environmental impact.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Support_for_Social_or_Non_Profit_Enterprises+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449426,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Group-Level AI Principles",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Group_Level_AI_Principles.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Group-Level AI Principles",
      "question": "Does the company have AI principles at the group level?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The emergence of frontier technologies, particularly AI, has immense potential for solving some of the world's greatest challenges, but it also presents many risks. These include reducing the need for human intervention, threatening job security, posing dangers to privacy and enhancing potential for discrimination.<br>\nAI can play an important role in achieving the SDGs. But it also carries huge human rights and other risks that can cause serious harms if it is developed without careful scrutiny, transparency and commitment to responsible principles. In 2023, 28% of ICT firms used AI, higher than any other sector.xxvi Holding digital technology companies accountable for the way they develop and use AI has become more critical than ever.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company publicly discloses its own AI principles that apply at the group level. AI principles must be developed by the company itself, not adopted from or limited to international or regional frameworks. The disclosure must clearly state the company‚s guiding principles for the ethical development, use, or deployment of AI technologies. Accepted formats include a standalone document, AI principles webpage, or relevant company policy document such as a human rights or data privacy policy; annual or sustainability reports do not qualify.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Group_Level_AI_Principles+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449438,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Alignment with Regional or International AI Frameworks",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Alignment_with_Regional_or_International_AI_Frameworks.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Alignment with Regional or International AI Frameworks",
      "question": "Does the company commit to align its practices with regional or international AI frameworks/principles?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The emergence of frontier technologies, particularly AI, has immense potential for solving some of the world's greatest challenges, but it also presents many risks. These include reducing the need for human intervention, threatening job security, posing dangers to privacy and enhancing potential for discrimination.<br>\nAI can play an important role in achieving the SDGs. But it also carries huge human rights and other risks that can cause serious harms if it is developed without careful scrutiny, transparency and commitment to responsible principles. In 2023, 28% of ICT firms used AI, higher than any other sector.xxvi Holding digital technology companies accountable for the way they develop and use AI has become more critical than ever.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThecompany shows alignment with at least one recognizedregional or internationalethical AIframework, via a formal commitment orwithinrobust AI governance documentation.<br>\nAcceptable frameworksarethe EU AI Act, The Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI, UN General Assembly Resolution ‚Seizing the opportunities of safe, secure, and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems for sustainable development‚, UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI, OECD AI Principles, G20 AI Principles, ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics, the IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems,,Information technology-Artificial intelligence-Overview of ethical and societal concerns,US Executive Order on AI,Continental AI African Union Strategy, AI Ethics Code by AI Alliance Russia.,Continental AI African Union Strategy.<br>\nThis element requires a company to make a commitment in aformal, publicly disclosed governance document. Acceptable examples include, but are not limited to, astandalone policy,code of conduct,corporate governance statement,businessprinciples,dedicated webpage, or being asignatory to a formal initiative suchas the AI Pact.WBA does not accept a commitment found in a report (e.g. an annual or sustainability report that is updated annually) even if the company explains that it is company policy and/or it is approved by the highest governing body. This requires the company to make a commitment using strong language such as, but not limited to ‚We respect‚,‚We commit to respect‚,‚We adhere to‚,‚We uphold‚,‚We are committed to‚ .",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Alignment_with_Regional_or_International_AI_Frameworks+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449450,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Human Rights Integration in AI Principles",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Human_Rights_Integration_in_AI_Principles.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Human Rights Integration in AI Principles",
      "question": "Do the company's AI principles incorporate respect for human rights?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The emergence of frontier technologies, particularly AI, has immense potential for solving some of the world's greatest challenges, but it also presents many risks. These include reducing the need for human intervention, threatening job security, posing dangers to privacy and enhancing potential for discrimination.<br>\nAI can play an important role in achieving the SDGs. But it also carries huge human rights and other risks that can cause serious harms if it is developed without careful scrutiny, transparency and commitment to responsible principles. In 2023, 28% of ICT firms used AI, higher than any other sector.xxvi Holding digital technology companies accountable for the way they develop and use AI has become more critical than ever.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company explicitly integrates respect for human rights within its AI principles or related documents. This means the principles must refer to ‚human rights‚ or be informed by international human rights law or the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). References to human well-being, values, or agency are not sufficient. General opposition to harmful technology use is also not accepted unless it is directly tied to AI and specific human rights.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Human_Rights_Integration_in_AI_Principles+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449462,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Human Rights Impact Assessment for AI Systems",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Human_Rights_Impact_Assessment_for_AI_Systems.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Human Rights Impact Assessment for AI Systems",
      "question": "Does the company carry out human rights impact assessments for the AI systems it develops or uses?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The emergence of frontier technologies, particularly AI, has immense potential for solving some of the world's greatest challenges, but it also presents many risks. These include reducing the need for human intervention, threatening job security, posing dangers to privacy and enhancing potential for discrimination.<br>\nAI can play an important role in achieving the SDGs. But it also carries huge human rights and other risks that can cause serious harms if it is developed without careful scrutiny, transparency and commitment to responsible principles. In 2023, 28% of ICT firms used AI, higher than any other sector.xxvi Holding digital technology companies accountable for the way they develop and use AI has become more critical than ever.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe companydisclosesthat it conducts human rights impact assessments (HRIAs) on its AI systems, whether developed internally or sourced from others. These assessments may be periodic or case-specific and must go beyond general human rights due diligence. The company must describe the scope of the HRIA (e.g., which tool, region, or community it applies to),identify the individuals, groups, or communities that are currently or potentially affected,and identify the human rights risks and impacts associated with the company‚s AI use or deployment.In addition, the company shoulddemonstratethat it carries out stakeholder consultation and continuous monitoring of human rightsimpactsthroughout the AI lifecycle to ensure respect for human rights.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Human_Rights_Impact_Assessment_for_AI_Systems+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449474,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+AI Governance Mechanisms Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+AI_Governance_Mechanisms_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "AI Governance Mechanisms Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its AI governance mechanisms?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The emergence of frontier technologies, particularly AI, has immense potential for solving some of the world's greatest challenges, but it also presents many risks. These include reducing the need for human intervention, threatening job security, posing dangers to privacy and enhancing potential for discrimination.<br>\nAI can play an important role in achieving the SDGs. But it also carries huge human rights and other risks that can cause serious harms if it is developed without careful scrutiny, transparency and commitment to responsible principles. In 2023, 28% of ICT firms used AI, higher than any other sector.xxvi Holding digital technology companies accountable for the way they develop and use AI has become more critical than ever.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company describes its internal governance structures for AI oversight. This includesidentifyingthe committee or governance body responsible for overseeing AI-related issues and clarifying how AI principles are implemented throughout the AI lifecycle. The company must alsodisclosethatit engages with external stakeholders on AI risks and regulation.Additionaldisclosures may include the seniority of the governance body, guidance for stakeholder engagement, and training provided to employees or users of AI systems.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+AI_Governance_Mechanisms_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449486,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Employment Metrics by Underrepresented Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Employment_Metrics_by_Underrepresented_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Employment Metrics by Underrepresented Group",
      "question": "Does the company disclose employment metrics by underrepresented group?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Development of digital goods and services needs to be inclusive to meet the needs of diverse global users. Yet, women and other vulnerable groups remain underrepresented in the digital sector. As digital technologies increasingly underpin how we work and live, it becomes equally crucial for underrepresented groups to have a voice in shaping and creating these technologies, to ensure these do not perpetuate bias and discrimination. Digital technology companies are influential towards achieving digital inclusion of underrepresented groups through the employment they provide, the R&D they undertake and the products and services they deliver globally.<br>\nFor a digital technology company, representation of minority groups is even more important in the tech teams that build products and services. Increasing the number of underrepresented groups (beyond gender) involved during the design process leads to more innovation in the development of digital products and services.<br>\nCompanies need to exhibit leadership in diversifying their technical workforce, moving past the common lament that those with requisite skills are not available. If the educational system is failing, companies need to take concrete actions to preserve their resilience and adaptability in a changing world.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses quantitative employment data broken down by at least one underrepresented group, such as gender, ethnicity, disability status, LGBTQ+ identity, national origin.<br>\nThe company must report workforce representation or representation in leadership as a percentage for at least one underrepresented group (e.g. ‚25% of the global workforce identifies as female‚). For gender data, the company must report at the group or global level. Subsidiary-level reporting alone is not sufficient for gender metrics. For all other underrepresented groups beyond gender, data can be reported at any level (e.g. subsidiary, regional, or global) as long as the methodology and group definition are clearly laid out.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Employment_Metrics_by_Underrepresented_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449498,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+STEM and Tech Staff by Underrepresented Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+STEM_and_Tech_Staff_by_Underrepresented_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "STEM and Tech Staff by Underrepresented Group",
      "question": "Does the company report its number of staff in STEM, IT or tech/engineering/R&D roles, by underrepresented group?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Development of digital goods and services needs to be inclusive to meet the needs of diverse global users. Yet, women and other vulnerable groups remain underrepresented in the digital sector. As digital technologies increasingly underpin how we work and live, it becomes equally crucial for underrepresented groups to have a voice in shaping and creating these technologies, to ensure these do not perpetuate bias and discrimination. Digital technology companies are influential towards achieving digital inclusion of underrepresented groups through the employment they provide, the R&D they undertake and the products and services they deliver globally.<br>\nFor a digital technology company, representation of minority groups is even more important in the tech teams that build products and services. Increasing the number of underrepresented groups (beyond gender) involved during the design process leads to more innovation in the development of digital products and services.<br>\nCompanies need to exhibit leadership in diversifying their technical workforce, moving past the common lament that those with requisite skills are not available. If the educational system is failing, companies need to take concrete actions to preserve their resilience and adaptability in a changing world.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses quantitative workforce data for employees in STEM, ICT, engineering, or R&D-related roles, broken down by at least one underrepresented group, such as gender, ethnicity, nationality, sexual orientation.<br>\nThe company must report percentages for employees working per technical role.<br>\nFor gender, sex-disaggregated data (e.g. proportion of women in R&D) is acceptable.<br>\nThe data can be reported at any level (subsidiary, country, regional, or group level) as long as the role-specific and demographic breakdown is clearly presented.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+STEM_and_Tech_Staff_by_Underrepresented_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449510,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Programme Supporting Underrepresented Staff in Technical Roles",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Programme_Supporting_Underrepresented_Staff_in_Technical_Roles.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Programme Supporting Underrepresented Staff in Technical Roles",
      "question": "Does the company have a program to support staff from at least one underrepresented group in their technical or professional growth?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Development of digital goods and services needs to be inclusive to meet the needs of diverse global users. Yet, women and other vulnerable groups remain underrepresented in the digital sector. As digital technologies increasingly underpin how we work and live, it becomes equally crucial for underrepresented groups to have a voice in shaping and creating these technologies, to ensure these do not perpetuate bias and discrimination. Digital technology companies are influential towards achieving digital inclusion of underrepresented groups through the employment they provide, the R&D they undertake and the products and services they deliver globally.<br>\nFor a digital technology company, representation of minority groups is even more important in the tech teams that build products and services. Increasing the number of underrepresented groups (beyond gender) involved during the design process leads to more innovation in the development of digital products and services.<br>\nCompanies need to exhibit leadership in diversifying their technical workforce, moving past the common lament that those with requisite skills are not available. If the educational system is failing, companies need to take concrete actions to preserve their resilience and adaptability in a changing world.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses a programme or initiative aimed at supporting the technical or professional development of employees from at least one underrepresented group, such as women, ethnic minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals, etc.<br>\nThe programme must be embedded in the company‚s business operations, not a one-off event or ad hoc support, and must have run at least once during the reporting period of interest. The focus should be on advancing career growth, technical skill development, or professional leadership for underrepresented groups.<br>\nAcceptable forms of support include: mentorship or sponsorship programmes, technical training, leadership or career coaching, peer learning communities, internal/external networking initiatives, scholarships, grants, partnerships with external organisations or institutions (e.g. non-profits, universities) that help deliver these programmes.<br>\nThe initiative must go beyond self-guided learning or access to general content platforms (e.g. Coursera). It should include structured engagement, tailored content, and a clear goal of improving equity in professional development outcomes.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Programme_Supporting_Underrepresented_Staff_in_Technical_Roles+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449522,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Time-Bound Target for Underrepresented Groups in STEM Roles",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Time_Bound_Target_for_Underrepresented_Groups_in_STEM_Roles.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Time-Bound Target for Underrepresented Groups in STEM Roles",
      "question": "Does the company have a time-bound target to increase the proportional number of employees from at least one underrepresented group in STEM, IT or tech/engineering/R&D roles?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Development of digital goods and services needs to be inclusive to meet the needs of diverse global users. Yet, women and other vulnerable groups remain underrepresented in the digital sector. As digital technologies increasingly underpin how we work and live, it becomes equally crucial for underrepresented groups to have a voice in shaping and creating these technologies, to ensure these do not perpetuate bias and discrimination. Digital technology companies are influential towards achieving digital inclusion of underrepresented groups through the employment they provide, the R&D they undertake and the products and services they deliver globally.<br>\nFor a digital technology company, representation of minority groups is even more important in the tech teams that build products and services. Increasing the number of underrepresented groups (beyond gender) involved during the design process leads to more innovation in the development of digital products and services.<br>\nCompanies need to exhibit leadership in diversifying their technical workforce, moving past the common lament that those with requisite skills are not available. If the educational system is failing, companies need to take concrete actions to preserve their resilience and adaptability in a changing world.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses numerical time-bound targets to increase the proportional number or employees from at least one underrepresented group in STEM, ICT or R&D roles. In the case of gender employees targets, time-bound targets must meet the following criteria: (1) be group-wide rather than country-specific, (2) specify its baseline year, unless it is a target for 0%, 100%, or absolute numbers, and (3) specify its target year.‚‚",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Time_Bound_Target_for_Underrepresented_Groups_in_STEM_Roles+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449533,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Diversity and inclusion policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Diversity_and_inclusion_policy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Diversity and inclusion policy",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a policy committing to building a diverse and inclusive workplace?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Development of digital goods and services needs to be inclusive to meet the needs of diverse global users. Yet, women and other vulnerable groups remain underrepresented in the digital sector. As digital technologies increasingly underpin how we work and live, it becomes equally crucial for underrepresented groups to have a voice in shaping and creating these technologies, to ensure these do not perpetuate bias and discrimination. Digital technology companies are influential towards achieving digital inclusion of underrepresented groups through the employment they provide, the R&D they undertake and the products and services they deliver globally.<br>\nFor a digital technology company, representation of minority groups is even more important in the tech teams that build products and services. Increasing the number of underrepresented groups (beyond gender) involved during the design process leads to more innovation in the development of digital products and services.<br>\nCompanies need to exhibit leadership in diversifying their technical workforce, moving past the common lament that those with requisite skills are not available. If the educational system is failing, companies need to take concrete actions to preserve their resilience and adaptability in a changing world.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses a Diversity and Inclusivity policy that applies at group level.‚The Diversity and Inclusivity policy shall be disclosed in a standalone document or webpage.‚The policy must contain anti-discrimination or anti-harassment principles. The following terms are also accepted: Diversity\\Diverse\\Inclusion\\Inclusive\\Inclusivity Guidelines, Policy, Principles‚.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Diversity_and_inclusion_policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449545,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Economic Value Generated and Distributed Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Economic_Value_Generated_and_Distributed_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Economic Value Generated and Distributed Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose, in one table, all of the elements of its direct economic value generated and distributed (EVG&D), except community investments?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Some digital businesses are able to provide digital services remotely to customers around the world using little to no infrastructure of their own, yet they gain substantial value from interaction with users. This can lead to imbalanced economic value distribution, particularly in tax payments, which impacts governments’ abilities to fund essential services in developing countries. <br>\nTaxation, critical to achieving SDG target 17.1 on resource mobilisation, is increasingly challenged by digitalisation, prompting global efforts like the OECD/G20 framework to address these issues.  Digital companies need to be transparent about their global economic value generation and distribution. Inaction on the part of companies only serves to strengthen reasons to be critical of them and harms their reputations. Moreover, without vibrant and growing economies across the globe, digital companies will find it increasingly challenging to sell their goods and services.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThis element evaluates a company's ability to comprehensively disclose its Direct Economic Value Generated and Distributed (EVG&D) in alignment with international sustainability reporting standards, particularly GRI 201-1. The disclosure should provide a detailed breakdown of how the organization creates and distributes economic value to key stakeholders, including employees, suppliers, capital providers, governments, and communities.‚The presentation of EVG&D data should be in a single table, covering global operations, and reported on an accruals basis. Key components include revenues, operating costs, employee wages and benefits, payments to providers of capital, payments to governments, and economic value retained.‚",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Economic_Value_Generated_and_Distributed_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449557,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Community Investments Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Community_Investments_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Community Investments Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose community investments?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Some digital businesses are able to provide digital services remotely to customers around the world using little to no infrastructure of their own, yet they gain substantial value from interaction with users. This can lead to imbalanced economic value distribution, particularly in tax payments, which impacts governments’ abilities to fund essential services in developing countries. <br>\nTaxation, critical to achieving SDG target 17.1 on resource mobilisation, is increasingly challenged by digitalisation, prompting global efforts like the OECD/G20 framework to address these issues.  Digital companies need to be transparent about their global economic value generation and distribution. Inaction on the part of companies only serves to strengthen reasons to be critical of them and harms their reputations. Moreover, without vibrant and growing economies across the globe, digital companies will find it increasingly challenging to sell their goods and services.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nCommunity investments refer to voluntary expenditures made to support the broader community, including funding for educational programs, health initiatives, arts and culture, or infrastructure projects unrelated to the company‚s core business needs. These investments exclude activities that are legal or commercial in nature or those aimed solely at facilitating the organization‚s operations.‚<br>\nThe company needs to report the total value of community investments, specifying the form of contributions, such as cash donations, in-kind support, or employee volunteer time. The disclosure must align with sustainability reporting standards, such as GRI 201-1, and emphasize actual expenditures during the reporting period rather than commitments.‚",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Community_Investments_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449569,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Income Tax Disclosure by Country",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Income_Tax_Disclosure_by_Country.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Income Tax Disclosure by Country",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the income taxes it pays in all its countries of operation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Some digital businesses are able to provide digital services remotely to customers around the world using little to no infrastructure of their own, yet they gain substantial value from interaction with users. This can lead to imbalanced economic value distribution, particularly in tax payments, which impacts governments’ abilities to fund essential services in developing countries. <br>\nTaxation, critical to achieving SDG target 17.1 on resource mobilisation, is increasingly challenged by digitalisation, prompting global efforts like the OECD/G20 framework to address these issues.  Digital companies need to be transparent about their global economic value generation and distribution. Inaction on the part of companies only serves to strengthen reasons to be critical of them and harms their reputations. Moreover, without vibrant and growing economies across the globe, digital companies will find it increasingly challenging to sell their goods and services.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThis element requires companies to disclose income taxes paid in a manner that reflects the geographical distribution of their activities. The company discloses a break-down of income taxes on a country-by-country basis. For companies operating in a single country, disclosures should provide a provincial breakdown.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Income_Tax_Disclosure_by_Country+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449581,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Workforce Breakdown by Country",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workforce_Breakdown_by_Country.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Workforce Breakdown by Country",
      "question": "Does the company provide a breakdown of its workforce across all countries of operation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Some digital businesses are able to provide digital services remotely to customers around the world using little to no infrastructure of their own, yet they gain substantial value from interaction with users. This can lead to imbalanced economic value distribution, particularly in tax payments, which impacts governments’ abilities to fund essential services in developing countries. <br>\nTaxation, critical to achieving SDG target 17.1 on resource mobilisation, is increasingly challenged by digitalisation, prompting global efforts like the OECD/G20 framework to address these issues.  Digital companies need to be transparent about their global economic value generation and distribution. Inaction on the part of companies only serves to strengthen reasons to be critical of them and harms their reputations. Moreover, without vibrant and growing economies across the globe, digital companies will find it increasingly challenging to sell their goods and services.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses its workforce distribution across its main countries of operation. The disclosure should include the total number of employees or the proportion of employees by country. Regional aggregations (e.g., ASEAN, North America) are not accepted. For companies operating predominantly in one country, a provincial or state-level breakdown is accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workforce_Breakdown_by_Country+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449593,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Indirect Economic Impacts Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Indirect_Economic_Impacts_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Indirect Economic Impacts Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report its indirect economic impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Some digital businesses are able to provide digital services remotely to customers around the world using little to no infrastructure of their own, yet they gain substantial value from interaction with users. This can lead to imbalanced economic value distribution, particularly in tax payments, which impacts governments’ abilities to fund essential services in developing countries. <br>\nTaxation, critical to achieving SDG target 17.1 on resource mobilisation, is increasingly challenged by digitalisation, prompting global efforts like the OECD/G20 framework to address these issues.  Digital companies need to be transparent about their global economic value generation and distribution. Inaction on the part of companies only serves to strengthen reasons to be critical of them and harms their reputations. Moreover, without vibrant and growing economies across the globe, digital companies will find it increasingly challenging to sell their goods and services.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses indirect economic impacts resulting from its operations, beyond its direct financial transactions. Positive and negative impacts may be reported but inclusion of at least some specific examples is required.<br>\nSpecific examples of indirect economic impacts caused by its business activities may include (but are not limited to): changes in productivity of industries, sectors, or the broader economy, economic development in underserved areas (e.g. job creation, poverty reduction, infrastructure development), supply chain impacts, availability of products/services to low-income populations, skills and knowledge development, social or environmental condition changes with economic consequences, foreign direct investment stimulation or limitation, relocation of operations and its economic effects, etc.<br>\nAlternatively, the company may disclose the significance of its indirect economic impacts in the context of external benchmarks and stakeholder priorities, such as national and international standards, protocols, and policy agendas.‚",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Indirect_Economic_Impacts_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449605,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report on its greenhouse gas emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Emissions among digital companies rose by 8% between 2020 and 2022. Regardless, GHG emissions reporting by digital companies suffers increasingly from transparency issues. According to the GHG Protocol guidance, disclosing scope 2 location-based emissions is mandatory, while market-based emissions should only be included if applicable. However, some companies only report the generally lower market-based figure, which can be misleading as it does not accurately reflect their actual emissions from electricity consumption. Furthermore, as companies increasingly consider upstream and downstream emissions (scope 3), they sometimes shift emissions from one scope or category to another, hampering transparency and comparability.<br>\nSome digital companies have large supply chains with significant GHG emissions. Supply chain emissions generally far outnumber companies’ operational emissions. It is, therefore, crucial for companies to work with their supply chains to reduce emissions. Some companies already obligate suppliers to meet some type of environmental obligations, particularly for GHG emissions (e.g. reporting emissions inventories, moving to renewables, establishing an emissions reduction target).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThis element will be BASIC if:<br>\n  ALL of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n    Valid Accounting<br>\n    Disclosure Level is in Basic,Relevant,Full<br>\nAdditional conditions to be STANDARD:<br>\n  Disclosure Level is in Relevant,Full<br>\nAdditional conditions to be ADVANCED:<br>\n  Disclosure Level = Full<br>\nAdditional conditions to be NEXT PRACTICE:<br>\n  Valid Methodology = Yes<br>\nAdditional conditions to be LOW-CARBON ALIGNED:<br>\n  Independently verified is in Tags",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449617,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Reduction_Targets.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Targets",
      "question": "Does the company set targets to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Emissions among digital companies rose by 8% between 2020 and 2022. Regardless, GHG emissions reporting by digital companies suffers increasingly from transparency issues. According to the GHG Protocol guidance, disclosing scope 2 location-based emissions is mandatory, while market-based emissions should only be included if applicable. However, some companies only report the generally lower market-based figure, which can be misleading as it does not accurately reflect their actual emissions from electricity consumption. Furthermore, as companies increasingly consider upstream and downstream emissions (scope 3), they sometimes shift emissions from one scope or category to another, hampering transparency and comparability.<br>\nSome digital companies have large supply chains with significant GHG emissions. Supply chain emissions generally far outnumber companies’ operational emissions. It is, therefore, crucial for companies to work with their supply chains to reduce emissions. Some companies already obligate suppliers to meet some type of environmental obligations, particularly for GHG emissions (e.g. reporting emissions inventories, moving to renewables, establishing an emissions reduction target).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThis element will be BASIC if:<br>\n  Valid Targets >= 1<br>\nAdditional conditions to be STANDARD:<br>\n  ALL of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n    Number of S1+2 valid targets >= 1<br>\n    ANY of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n      The following statement should not be true:<br>\n        Significant S3 Emissions<br>\n      Number of S3 valid targets >= 1<br>\nAdditional conditions to be ADVANCED:<br>\n  If:<br>\n    Significant S3 Emissions<br>\n  Then:<br>\n    Valid Targets >= 4<br>\n  Else:<br>\n    Number of S1+2 valid targets >= 2<br>\nAdditional conditions to be NEXT PRACTICE:<br>\n  Valid Targets >= 4<br>\nAdditional conditions to be LOW-CARBON ALIGNED:<br>\n  ALL of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n    Number of S1+2 SBTi validated targets >= 2<br>\n    ANY of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n      The following statement should not be true:<br>\n        Significant S3 Emissions<br>\n      Number of S3 SBTi validated targets >= 2",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Reduction_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449629,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Progress on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Progress_on_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Reduction.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Progress on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction",
      "question": "Does the company report progress on reducing its greenhouse gas emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Emissions among digital companies rose by 8% between 2020 and 2022. Regardless, GHG emissions reporting by digital companies suffers increasingly from transparency issues. According to the GHG Protocol guidance, disclosing scope 2 location-based emissions is mandatory, while market-based emissions should only be included if applicable. However, some companies only report the generally lower market-based figure, which can be misleading as it does not accurately reflect their actual emissions from electricity consumption. Furthermore, as companies increasingly consider upstream and downstream emissions (scope 3), they sometimes shift emissions from one scope or category to another, hampering transparency and comparability.<br>\nSome digital companies have large supply chains with significant GHG emissions. Supply chain emissions generally far outnumber companies’ operational emissions. It is, therefore, crucial for companies to work with their supply chains to reduce emissions. Some companies already obligate suppliers to meet some type of environmental obligations, particularly for GHG emissions (e.g. reporting emissions inventories, moving to renewables, establishing an emissions reduction target).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nCompanies are expected to disclose GHG emissions across relevant scopes and emissions categories, considering the sectoral context in which the company operates and its activity profile.The following conditions must be evaluated in order to properly score this element:<br>\n- GHG emissions from companies are reported at least on an annual basis.<br>\n- The company describes how its GHG emissions were calculated. o for real economy companies, the company mentions the GHG accounting standards it used, e.g. ISO 14064-1 or GHG Protocol. o financial institutions outline the methodology for calculating scopes 1, 2, and 3 emissions (including financed GHG emissions) and total footprint. This should include<br>\n- The company discloses its operational GHG emissions (scopes 1 and 2) as separate categories.<br>\n- The company specifies whether its reported scope 2 emissions are location-based and/or market-based. Companies belonging to electricity-intensive sectors shall report location-based scope 2 emissions and may also report market-based emissions. Companies in these sectors shall also report scope 3 category 3 emissions, which are associated with their electricity use.<br>\n- The company discloses its value chain (scope 3) emissions per category for all relevant scope 3 categories\\* and provides a relevant rationale for any excluded category. The relevance is identified in terms of the GHG emissions categories that most contribute to the overall profile of total GHG emissions in which the company sits.<br>\n- For sectors for which non-CO2 emissions are significant, the company must report the CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) for all relevant GHG emissions.<br>\n- The company has its GHG inventory independently certified.<br>\n- Avoided emissions and carbon credits should be reported separately.**Attributes required**: Full emissions inventory, methodology for calculating emissions, andindependent verification of emissions disclosure.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Progress_on_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Reduction+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449641,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+1.5°C Compatible Sectoral Pathways for Target-Setting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+1_5_C_Compatible_Sectoral_Pathways_for_Target_Setting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "1.5°C Compatible Sectoral Pathways for Target-Setting",
      "question": "Are Sectoral pathways used for target-setting compatible with a 1.5 °C scenario?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Emissions among digital companies rose by 8% between 2020 and 2022. Regardless, GHG emissions reporting by digital companies suffers increasingly from transparency issues. According to the GHG Protocol guidance, disclosing scope 2 location-based emissions is mandatory, while market-based emissions should only be included if applicable. However, some companies only report the generally lower market-based figure, which can be misleading as it does not accurately reflect their actual emissions from electricity consumption. Furthermore, as companies increasingly consider upstream and downstream emissions (scope 3), they sometimes shift emissions from one scope or category to another, hampering transparency and comparability.<br>\nSome digital companies have large supply chains with significant GHG emissions. Supply chain emissions generally far outnumber companies’ operational emissions. It is, therefore, crucial for companies to work with their supply chains to reduce emissions. Some companies already obligate suppliers to meet some type of environmental obligations, particularly for GHG emissions (e.g. reporting emissions inventories, moving to renewables, establishing an emissions reduction target).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nThis element will be MET if:<br>\n  If:<br>\n    Scoring Class is Financial sector<br>\n  Then:<br>\n    ANY of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n      GMC\\_01889 is in 1.5∞C,Well-below 2∞C,2∞C,NA<br>\n      GMC\\_01894 is in 1.5∞C,Well-below 2∞C,2∞C,NA<br>\n      unspecified is in GMC\\_01898<br>\n      unspecified is in GMC\\_01899<br>\n  Else:<br>\n    ALL of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n      ANY of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n        GMC\\_01879 = 1.5∞C<br>\n        GMC\\_01884 = 1.5∞C<br>\n        Scope 1+2 is in GMC\\_01898<br>\n        Scope 1+2 is in GMC\\_01899<br>\n      ANY of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n        Significant S3 Emissions = false<br>\n        GMC\\_01889 is in 1.5∞C,Well-below 2∞C,2∞C,NA<br>\n        GMC\\_01894 is in 1.5∞C,Well-below 2∞C,2∞C,NA<br>\n        Scope 3 is in GMC\\_01898<br>\n        Scope 3 is in GMC\\_01899<br>\n<br>\nGMC descriptions:<br>\n GMC\\_01884: S1+2 long-term target SBTi temperature classification<br>\n GMC\\_01889: S3 near-term target SBTi temperature classification<br>\n GMC\\_01899: 1.5∞C pathway reference from credible institutions<br>\n GMC\\_01894: S3 long-term target SBTi temperature classification<br>\n GMC\\_01898: 1.5∞C pathway reference from SBTi Net-Zero standard or ISO Net-zero guidelines<br>\n GMC\\_01879: S1+2 near-term target SBTi temperature classification",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+1_5_C_Compatible_Sectoral_Pathways_for_Target_Setting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449653,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Water Use and Energy Consumption Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Water_Use_and_Energy_Consumption_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Water Use and Energy Consumption Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report its water use and/or its energy consumption?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Growing digitalisation is resulting in increasing use of natural resources. For digital inclusion to be truly beneficial, it must not lead to environmental degradation. Monitoring and improving energy use and water pollution helps ensure that digital expansion does not come at the cost of environmental harm, which can affect the same populations that digital inclusion aims to empower.<br>\nEnvironmental sustainability is closely tied to digital inclusion and rights because communities that benefit from digital inclusion efforts may also bear the environmental costs associated with digital infrastructure, such as energy-intensive data centres and potential water pollution from manufacturing facilities. Ensuring that digital inclusion initiatives are sustainable helps protect these communities from environmental harm, supporting their right to a clean and safe environment.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nFor water use: This element follows the same guidelines as element B05.A in the FAB benchmark and element B08.A in the Nature benchmark.‚<br>\nThe company must report the following metrics on the company‚s entire operations:<br>\nWater withdrawal<br>\nWater consumption<br>\nWater withdrawal and consumption from water-stressed areas, at least from areas with high water stress and above<br>\nWater-stressed areas must be identified following a recognized tool or methodology (e.g., the WRI Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas).Aggregatedmetricsfrom water-stressed areasare acceptable, although best practice isdisaggregated. Exceptions to accepting one ofthe two metricsare possible for some industries(e.g.realestate)if the****ability to return water to the network is restricted due to local infrastructure,or if the company explicitly states that its withdrawal and consumption figures are equal (e.g.a restaurant chainthat consumes all the water it withdraws). Reporting must cover the company‚s entire operations.Datapoint must be from the most recent reporting period. Intensity metrics are not accepted.<br>\n-----<br>\nFor energy consumption: This element follows the same guidelines as Urban benchmark. <br>\nThe company must disclose the following information:<br>\nEnergy consumption from renewable sources.<br>\nBreak down its reporting on its energy consumption from renewable sources into clear categorical distinctions.<br>\nEnergy consumption from non-renewable sources.<br>\nBreak down its reporting on its energy consumption from non-renewable sources into clear categorical distinctions.<br>\nNote that if the company reports its overall energy consumption, it must disclose non-renewable and renewable consumption with clear categorical distinctions of the energy sources.<br>\nDatapoints must be no older than three years.The data must cover the company‚s entire operations, and must be disclosed using absolute values.<br>\n <br>\nThis element applies to both energy and water consumption for companies in the following sectors: Content Production and Distribution, Financial Services, Hardware, Retail of Goods and Services, and Software and Information Services. For the Telecommunications sector, only energy consumption is applicable.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Water_Use_and_Energy_Consumption_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449665,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Targets for Water Use Reduction or Energy Efficiency",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Targets_for_Water_Use_Reduction_or_Energy_Efficiency.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Targets for Water Use Reduction or Energy Efficiency",
      "question": "Does the company set targets to reduce its water use and/or increase its energy efficiency?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Growing digitalisation is resulting in increasing use of natural resources. For digital inclusion to be truly beneficial, it must not lead to environmental degradation. Monitoring and improving energy use and water pollution helps ensure that digital expansion does not come at the cost of environmental harm, which can affect the same populations that digital inclusion aims to empower.<br>\nEnvironmental sustainability is closely tied to digital inclusion and rights because communities that benefit from digital inclusion efforts may also bear the environmental costs associated with digital infrastructure, such as energy-intensive data centres and potential water pollution from manufacturing facilities. Ensuring that digital inclusion initiatives are sustainable helps protect these communities from environmental harm, supporting their right to a clean and safe environment.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nFor water use: The company must set a target on its water withdrawal <strong>OR</strong> water consumption that covers at least its own operations (including aggregated targets, e.g. reducing total net water consumption). If the target covers only a subset of the company‚s operations or value chain (e.g. a specific water basin; specific water-stressed areas), it should be methodologically justified.<br>\n<br>\nTargets must be timebound, with a defined baseline value and year, and include clear, quantitative, and measurable metrics. They should focus on short-term progress up to 2030, with any longer-term goals broken down into interim targets no more than five years apart. Intensity targets are not accepted, as they do not ensure absolute improvements. Year-on-year targets and qualitative targets may be accepted on a case-by-case basis, depending on their ambition and measurability. Any changes to targets or their underlying assumptions must be explained, particularly in terms of impact on comparability. Additionally, targets aimed solely at maintaining current performance are not accepted.<br>\n-----<br>\nFor renewable energy share: <br>\nThe company must disclose at least one of the following types of targets:<br>\nReducing energy consumption<br>\nIncreasing the proportion of renewable energy use<br>\nImproving energy efficiency<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> Targets aimed at maintaining energy consumption levels are not accepted.</em><br>\nTargets must be timebound and include the baseline value and base year from which progress is measured.<br>\nTargets must have clear, quantitative, and measurable metrics.<br>\nTargets must be short-term (now to 2030). Longer term targets (i.e. those with an end date past 2030) are only accepted if they are broken down into interim targets, that are 5 years away or less.<br>\nThe target must cover all of the company‚s operations.<br>\nFor Real Estate companies, the company should set targets that not only cover its own operations but also portfolio, managed or operating properties.<br>\nThe targets must be clearly relevant to the company‚s operations, core businesses, or products and services.<br>\nThe target must refer to absolute emissions reductions. Intensity targets are accepted if they can lead to absolute improvements.<br>\n <br>\nThis element applies to both energy and water consumption for companies in the following sectors: Content Production and Distribution, Financial Services, Hardware, Retail of Goods and Services, and Software and Information Services. For the Telecommunications sector, only energy consumption is applicable.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Targets_for_Water_Use_Reduction_or_Energy_Efficiency+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23449677,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Progress on Water Use Reduction or Energy Efficiency",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Progress_on_Water_Use_Reduction_or_Energy_Efficiency.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Progress on Water Use Reduction or Energy Efficiency",
      "question": "Does the company report progress on reducing its water use and/or increasing its energy efficiency?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core. <br>\n<br>\nMore information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/digital-inclusion-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Growing digitalisation is resulting in increasing use of natural resources. For digital inclusion to be truly beneficial, it must not lead to environmental degradation. Monitoring and improving energy use and water pollution helps ensure that digital expansion does not come at the cost of environmental harm, which can affect the same populations that digital inclusion aims to empower.<br>\nEnvironmental sustainability is closely tied to digital inclusion and rights because communities that benefit from digital inclusion efforts may also bear the environmental costs associated with digital infrastructure, such as energy-intensive data centres and potential water pollution from manufacturing facilities. Ensuring that digital inclusion initiatives are sustainable helps protect these communities from environmental harm, supporting their right to a clean and safe environment.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\nFor water use: The company must report on both withdrawal and consumption for its entire operations. It must report year-on-year, absolute reductions for three consecutive years on one of the two. If the company reports data on withdrawal and consumption, but is only improving in one, the element is only Met if it is not worsening in the other.<br>\nFor renewable energy share:‚‚The company must demonstrate monotonic, quantitative reductions or improvements in relevant topic-specific metrics over the previous three years (i.e. three years in a row with continuous year-on-year improvement). The company must demonstrate: <br>\n- Quantitative absolute or relative reductions in its non-renewable energy consumption.<br>\n- Increase in renewable energy metrics. <br>\nThe company must report reduction in non-renewable energy consumption must include at least one of the following: <br>\n- Absolute reductions in non-renewable energy consumption.  <br>\n- Reductions in emission intensity are accepted only if the company discloses that the reductions in emission intensity lead to absolute emission reductions.<br>\n- Relative reductions in their rate of energy consumption relative to their activity. For this indicator, this would mean that the company would need to report quantitative metrics related to their activity and their energy consumption reporting data, to obtain a rate of energy consumption.<br>\nThis element applies to both energy and water consumption for companies in the following sectors: Content Production and Distribution, Financial Services, Hardware, Retail of Goods and Services, and Software and Information Services. For the Telecommunications sector, only energy consumption is applicable.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 200,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 200,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Progress_on_Water_Use_Reduction_or_Energy_Efficiency+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23698925,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+CSDDD Applicability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+CSDDD_Applicability.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "CSDDD Applicability",
      "question": "Is the company within the revised scope of the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric assesses whether a company falls within the scope of the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD).</p>\r\n<p>The CSDDD is a law that requires large companies operating in the EU to implement due diligence processes to identify, prevent, mitigate, and account for adverse impacts on human rights, the environment, and good governance across their operations and value chains. It also mandates reporting on due diligence measures and risk management.</p>\r\n<p>The CSDDD sets thresholds for inclusion based on company size and activity:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>EU-based companies meeting one of the following two thresholds in the previous fiscal year:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>€1.5 billion+ annual net turnover</li>\r\n<li>5000+ employees</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n<li>Non-EU companies generating €1.5 billion+ in net turnover in the EU in the year preceding the last financial year</li>\r\n<li>Subsidiaries are aggregated with parent companies for assessment</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Steps for researchers</span>:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Company type and location</span>: Check whether the company is EU-based or non-EU with EU operations.</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Employee and financial thresholds</span>:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>EU-based companies meeting one of the following two thresholds in the previous fiscal year: €1.5 billion+ annual net turnover and/or 5000+ employees</li>\r\n<li>Non-EU companies generating €1.5 billion+ in net turnover in the EU in the year preceding the last financial year</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Non-EU companies</span>: Verify EU turnover and presence of qualifying subsidiaries or branches.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Sources to consult:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><a href=\"https://www.somo.nl/csddd-datahub/\">SOMO CSDDD Datahub</a></li>\r\n<li>CSDDD reports (this indicates they are in scope)</li>\r\n<li>Company annual reports and financial statements (for employees, turnover, and total assets)</li>\r\n<li>Sustainability / ESG reports (may indicate anticipated CSRD reporting)</li>\r\n<li>Regulated EU stock exchange listings (to check listing status and micro-enterprise exemption)</li>\r\n<li>National corporate registries (legal form, headquarters, subsidiaries, branches, sometimes employee counts)</li>\r\n<li>Company websites and investor relations pages (information on EU operations, subsidiaries, and branches)</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Integrated Report",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Environment",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+CSDDD_Applicability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23698938,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Duty of Vigilance Applicability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Duty_of_Vigilance_Applicability.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Duty of Vigilance Applicability",
      "question": "Is the company within the scope of the French Duty of Vigilance Law?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric assesses whether a company falls within the scope of the French Duty of Vigilance Law (La loi sur le devoir de vigilance).</p>\r\n<p>The French Duty of Vigilance Law requires large companies headquartered in France to implement a vigilance plan to identify and prevent risks of severe impacts on human rights, fundamental freedoms, health and safety, and the environment throughout their operations and supply chains. Companies must publicly disclose their vigilance plans and report on the measures taken.</p>\r\n<p>The Duty of Vigilance sets thresholds for inclusion based on company size:</p>\r\n<p>French companies with:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>5,000+ employees worldwide if headquartered in France, or</li>\r\n<li>10,000+ employees worldwide if the company has its headquarters outside France but has significant operations in France</li>\r\n<li>Subsidiaries are aggregated with parent companies for assessment</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "methodology": "<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Steps for researchers</span>:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Company type and location</span>: Check whether the company is EU-based or non-EU with EU operations.</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Employee and financial thresholds</span>:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>5,000+ employees worldwide if headquartered in France, or</li>\r\n<li>10,000+ employees worldwide if the company has its headquarters outside France but has significant operations in France</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Listing status</span>: For the original scope, check if the company is listed on an EU regulated market; micro-enterprises are excluded. For the revised scope, listing alone does not trigger applicability.</li>\r\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Non-EU companies</span>: Verify EU turnover and presence of qualifying subsidiaries or branches.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Sources to consult:</span></p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><a href=\"https://vigilance-plan.org/search/\">Search the Duty of Vigilance Radar</a></li>\r\n<li>Vigilance plans (this indicates they are in scope)</li>\r\n<li>Company annual reports and financial statements (for employees, turnover, and total assets)</li>\r\n</ul>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Duty_of_Vigilance_Applicability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699531,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Living Wages Paid Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wages_Paid_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Living Wages Paid Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company publicly disclose, based on data from the past two years, the percentage of supplier factories where a living wage is paid, and indicate which part of the supply chain this covers (at minimum by country)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, Fashion Checker, is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative transparency tool.<br><br><a href=\"https://fashionchecker.org/\">Fashion Checker</a> enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>Clean Clothes Campaign defines a living wage as wage that is <em>earned in a standard working week of no more than 48 hours and allows the garment worker to be able to buy food for herself and her family, pay the rent, pay for healthcare, clothing, transportation and education and have a small amount of savings for when something unexpected happens.</em></p>\r\n<p>(Source: <a href=\"https://cleanclothes.org/faq/pay-living-wages\">CCC</a>)</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company publicly discloses the percentage of supplier factories where a living wage is paid, and indicates which part of the supply chain this covers.</p>\r\n<p>If the company does publish living figures, the data <strong>must be from the last two years </strong>and be broken down <strong>at minimum by country-level</strong>. </p>\r\n<p>Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents, annual reports and sustainability reports.<br><br><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and Search Terms</span><br><br>- Living wage<br>- Supply chain<br>- Supplier list<br><br><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answer Input</span><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information.</p>\r\n<p>If the company has published publicly discloses the percentage of supplier factories where a living wage is paid with an indication of which part of the supply chain this covers, enter the answer as 'Yes'.</p>\r\n<p>If the company has no public disclosure of supplier factories where living wage is paid, enter the answer as 'No'.</p>\r\n<p>Please note: 'Unknown' is not a possible answer for this metric.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Living_Wages_Paid_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699543,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Grievance Mechanisms",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Grievance_Mechanisms.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanisms",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available grievance mechanism accessible to workers, and if so, what form does this grievance mechanism take?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative tool called Fashion Checker.<br><br><a href=\"https://fashionchecker.org/\">Fashion Checker</a> enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company has a publicly available grievance mechanism accessible to workers and, if so, what form it takes.</p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">The company grievance mechanism <strong>must be publicly available</strong>. The mechanism could be an email address, a phone number hotline and/or a webform. The company may have more than one mechanism.</span></p>\r\n<p>Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents and sustainability reports.<br><br><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and Search Terms</span><br><br>- Grievance mechanism<br>- Reporting mechanism<br>- Ethics hotline / channel / email / phone number<br><br><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answer Input</span><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information.</p>",
      "value_type": "Multi-Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Email",
        "Phone number",
        "Webform",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Grievance_Mechanisms+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699562,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Grievance Resolution Communication",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Grievance_Resolution_Communication.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Grievance Resolution Communication",
      "question": "Does the company communicate how grievances are addressed, in line with the OECD Guidelines?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative tool called Fashion Checker.<br><br><a href=\"https://fashionchecker.org/\">Fashion Checker</a> enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking whether the company publicly communicates how grievances are addressed, in line with the OECD Guidelines. </p>\r\n<p>The OECD guidelines state that companies should:</p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>track grievances and provide information about the functioning of the grievance mechanism</li>\r\n<li>publish the types of complaints received, the results of grievance processes, and the lessons learned, while respecting the confidentiality of complainants.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p>Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents, annual reports and sustainability reports.<br><br><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and Search Terms</span><br><br>- Grievances<br>- Grievance mechanism<br>- Remediation<br><br><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answer Input</span><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information.</p>\r\n<p>If the company does publicly communicate how grievances are addressed <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">in line with the OECD Guidelines</span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">, enter the answer as 'Yes'.</span></p>\r\n<p>If the company does not publish this information, enter the answer as 'No'.</p>\r\n<p>Please note: 'Unknown' is not a possible answer for this metric.</p>",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No"
      ],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Grievance_Resolution_Communication+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699574,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Grievance Mechanism (Email Address)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Grievance_Mechanism_Email_Address.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism (Email Address)",
      "question": "What is the company's publicly available email address for submitting grievances?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative tool called Fashion Checker.<br><br><a href=\"https://fashionchecker.org/\">Fashion Checker</a> enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking for the company's <strong>publicly available email address for submitting grievances</strong>. If the company does not have a <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">publicly available email address for grievances, do not answer this metric. </span></p>\r\n<p>Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents and sustainability reports.<br><br><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and Search Terms</span><br><br>- Grievance mechanism<br>- Reporting mechanism<br>- Email / contact point<br><br><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answer Input</span><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information.</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Grievance Mechanisms"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Grievance_Mechanism_Email_Address+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699586,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Grievance Mechanism (Hotline)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Grievance_Mechanism_Hotline.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism (Hotline)",
      "question": "What is the company's publicly available hotline / phone number for submitting grievances?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative tool called Fashion Checker.<br><br><a href=\"https://fashionchecker.org/\">Fashion Checker</a> enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking for the company's <strong>publicly available hotline</strong> for submitting grievances. If the company does not have a <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">publicly available hotline for grievances, do not answer this metric. </span></p>\r\n<p>Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents and sustainability reports.<br><br><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and Search Terms</span><br><br>- Grievance mechanism<br>- Reporting mechanism<br>- Hotline / phone number<br><br><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answer Input</span><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information.</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Grievance_Mechanism_Hotline+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699597,
      "name": "Clean Clothes Campaign+Grievance Mechanism (Webform)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Grievance_Mechanism_Webform.json",
      "designer": "Clean Clothes Campaign",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanism (Webform)",
      "question": "What is the company's publicly available webform / contact form URL for submitting grievances?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "<p>This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project is co-funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative tool called Fashion Checker.<br><br><a href=\"https://fashionchecker.org/\">Fashion Checker</a> enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.<br><br>The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.</p>",
      "methodology": "<p>This metric is asking for the company's <strong>publicly available webform / contact form URL</strong> for submitting grievances. If the company does not have a <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">publicly available URL for grievances, do not answer this metric. </span></p>\r\n<p>Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents such as policy documents and sustainability reports.<br><br><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Keywords and Search Terms</span><br><br>- Grievance mechanism<br>- Reporting mechanism<br>- Hotline / phone number<br><br><span style=\"font-weight: bolder;\">Answer Input</span><br><br>Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information.</p>",
      "value_type": "Free Text",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": "Company Website",
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/Clean_Clothes_Campaign+Grievance_Mechanism_Webform+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699615,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Commitment to Remedy Adverse Impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_Remedy_Adverse_Impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Commitment to Remedy Adverse Impacts",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_remedy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_Remedy_Adverse_Impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699631,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Business Relationship Commitment to Remedy Adverse Impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Business_Relationship_Commitment_to_Remedy_Adverse_Impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Business Relationship Commitment to Remedy Adverse Impacts",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_remedy.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Business_Relationship_Commitment_to_Remedy_Adverse_Impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699637,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Commitment to remedy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_remedy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Commitment to remedy",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~23699615",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699631",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_A_Respecting_Human_Rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Commitment_to_remedy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699645,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Stakeholder Involvement Identifying Human Rights Risk and Impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Stakeholder_Involvement_Identifying_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Stakeholder Involvement Identifying Human Rights Risk and Impacts",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Stakeholder_Involvement_Identifying_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699651,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Identifying human rights risks and impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Identifying human rights risks and impacts",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19246899",
          "weight": 33.3333
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246904",
          "weight": 33.33333
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699645",
          "weight": 33.33333
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_A_Respecting_Human_Rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Identifying_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699658,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Assessing Human Rights Risks and Impacts Processes (Own Operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessing_Human_Rights_Risks_and_Impacts_Processes_Own_Operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Assessing Human Rights Risks and Impacts Processes (Own Operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessing_Human_Rights_Risks_and_Impacts_Processes_Own_Operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699663,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Assessing Human Rights Risks and Impacts Processes (Supply Chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessing_Human_Rights_Risks_and_Impacts_Processes_Supply_Chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Assessing Human Rights Risks and Impacts Processes (Supply Chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessing_Human_Rights_Risks_and_Impacts_Processes_Supply_Chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699668,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Stakeholder Involvement Assessing Human Rights Risk and Impacts+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Stakeholder_Involvement_Assessing_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Stakeholder Involvement Assessing Human Rights Risk and Impacts",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Stakeholder_Involvement_Assessing_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impacts+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699673,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.4.B Assessing Human Rights Risks and Impacts Results+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_4_B_Assessing_Human_Rights_Risks_and_Impacts_Results+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.4.B Assessing Human Rights Risks and Impacts Results",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\",\"Not Applicable\":\"\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_4_B_Assessing_Human_Rights_Risks_and_Impacts_Results+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699680,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Assessing human rights risks and impacts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Assessing human rights risks and impacts",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~23699658",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699663",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699673",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699668",
          "weight": 25
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_A_Respecting_Human_Rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Assessing_human_rights_risks_and_impacts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699687,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Integrating and Acting on Human Rights Risk and Impact Assessments (Own Operations)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Integrating_and_Acting_on_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impact_Assessments_Own_Operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Integrating and Acting on Human Rights Risk and Impact Assessments (Own Operations)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Integrating_and_Acting_on_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impact_Assessments_Own_Operations+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699692,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Integrating and Acting on Human Rights Risk and Impact Assessments (Supply Chain)+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Integrating_and_Acting_on_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impact_Assessments_Supply_Chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Integrating and Acting on Human Rights Risk and Impact Assessments (Supply Chain)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Integrating_and_Acting_on_Human_Rights_Risk_and_Impact_Assessments_Supply_Chain+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699697,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Specific Actions Taken on human rights risks and impact assessments+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Specific_Actions_Taken_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Specific Actions Taken on human rights risks and impact assessments",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Specific_Actions_Taken_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699702,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Stakeholder involvement acting on human rights risks and impact assessments+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Stakeholder_involvement_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Stakeholder involvement acting on human rights risks and impact assessments",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Stakeholder_involvement_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699707,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Grievance Mechanisms for Workers+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Grievance_Mechanisms_for_Workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanisms for Workers",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1994,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1994,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_A_Respecting_Human_Rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Grievance_Mechanisms_for_Workers+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699717,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Grievance Mechanisms for External Individuals and Communities+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Grievance_Mechanisms_for_External_Individuals_and_Communities+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Grievance Mechanisms for External Individuals and Communities",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1994,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1994,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_A_Respecting_Human_Rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Grievance_Mechanisms_for_External_Individuals_and_Communities+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699728,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact assessments",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impact assessments",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~23699687",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699692",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699697",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699702",
          "weight": 25
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_A_Respecting_Human_Rights.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Integrating_and_acting_on_human_rights_risks_and_impact_assessments+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699746,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Theme A - Respecting Human Rights",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_A_Respecting_Human_Rights.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Theme A - Respecting Human Rights",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19246857",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19246890",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699637",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699651",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699680",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699728",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699707",
          "weight": 12.5
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699717",
          "weight": 12.5
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1992,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1992,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_Benchmark_2026_Methodology.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_A_Respecting_Human_Rights+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699753,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Living Wage Gap+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_Wage_Gap+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Living Wage Gap",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_wage_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_Wage_Gap+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699758,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Living Wage Business Relationship Evidence+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_Wage_Business_Relationship_Evidence+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Living Wage Business Relationship Evidence",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_wage_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_Wage_Business_Relationship_Evidence+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699763,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Fair Working Hours Commitment+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Fair_Working_Hours_Commitment+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Fair Working Hours Commitment",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Working_hours_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Fair_Working_Hours_Commitment+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699768,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Fair Working Hours Commitment in Business Relationship Employees+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Fair_Working_Hours_Commitment_in_Business_Relationship_Employees+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Fair Working Hours Commitment in Business Relationship Employees",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Working_hours_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Fair_Working_Hours_Commitment_in_Business_Relationship_Employees+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699773,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Workforce Other Diversity Disclosure+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workforce_Other_Diversity_Disclosure+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Workforce Other Diversity Disclosure",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1987,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1987,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workforce_Other_Diversity_Disclosure+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699778,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Gender Balance on Highest Governance Body+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Balance_on_Highest_Governance_Body+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Gender Balance on Highest Governance Body",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1989,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1989,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Balance_on_Highest_Governance_Body+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699783,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.10.B Living Wage Determination+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_B_Living_Wage_Determination+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.10.B Living Wage Determination",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_wage_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_B_Living_Wage_Determination+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699789,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.10.A Living Wage Targets+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_A_Living_Wage_Targets+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.10.A Living Wage Targets",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_wage_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_10_A_Living_Wage_Targets+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699796,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Living wage fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_wage_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Living wage fundamentals",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~23699783",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699753",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699789",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699758",
          "weight": 25
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_B_Providing_and_promoting_decent_work.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_wage_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699803,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.9.D Health and Safety Business Relationship Monitoring+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_D_Health_and_Safety_Business_Relationship_Monitoring+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.9.D Health and Safety Business Relationship Monitoring",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Health_and_safety_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_D_Health_and_Safety_Business_Relationship_Monitoring+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699809,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.9.B Health and Safety Quantitative Disclosure+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_B_Health_and_Safety_Quantitative_Disclosure+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.9.B Health and Safety Quantitative Disclosure",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Health_and_safety_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_9_B_Health_and_Safety_Quantitative_Disclosure+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699816,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Health and safety fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Health_and_safety_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Health and safety fundamentals",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~23699809",
          "weight": 50
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699803",
          "weight": 50
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_B_Providing_and_promoting_decent_work.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Health_and_safety_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699823,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.11.B Commitment to Fair Overtime+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_11_B_Commitment_to_Fair_Overtime+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.11.B Commitment to Fair Overtime",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Working_hours_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_11_B_Commitment_to_Fair_Overtime+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699830,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Working hours fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Working_hours_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Working hours fundamentals",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~23699763",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699823",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699768",
          "weight": 33.33
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_B_Providing_and_promoting_decent_work.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Working_hours_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699837,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.13.A Workforce Age Diversity Disclosure+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_A_Workforce_Age_Diversity_Disclosure+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.13.A Workforce Age Diversity Disclosure",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_A_Workforce_Age_Diversity_Disclosure+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699843,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.13.B Workforce Gender Diversity Disclosure+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_B_Workforce_Gender_Diversity_Disclosure+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.13.B Workforce Gender Diversity Disclosure",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_13_B_Workforce_Gender_Diversity_Disclosure+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699855,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Workforce diversity disclosure fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Workforce diversity disclosure fundamentals",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~23699837",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699843",
          "weight": 33.33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699773",
          "weight": 33.33
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1987,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1987,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_B_Providing_and_promoting_decent_work.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workforce_diversity_disclosure_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699862,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.14.A Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment Commitment+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_A_Gender_Equality_and_Women_s_Empowerment_Commitment+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.14.A Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment Commitment",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1995,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1995,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_A_Gender_Equality_and_Women_s_Empowerment_Commitment+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699873,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.14.B Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment Targets+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_B_Gender_Equality_and_Women_s_Empowerment_Targets+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.14.B Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment Targets",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1995,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1995,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_B_Gender_Equality_and_Women_s_Empowerment_Targets+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699879,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.14.D Gender Pay Ratio Disclosure+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_D_Gender_Pay_Ratio_Disclosure+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.14.D Gender Pay Ratio Disclosure",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_14_D_Gender_Pay_Ratio_Disclosure+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699892,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Gender equality and women’s empowerment fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Gender equality and women’s empowerment fundamentals",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~23699862",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699873",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699778",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699879",
          "weight": 25
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1987,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1987,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_B_Providing_and_promoting_decent_work.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_equality_and_women_s_empowerment_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699911,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Theme B - Providing and promoting decent work",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_B_Providing_and_promoting_decent_work.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Theme B - Providing and promoting decent work",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~23699816",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699796",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699830",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~19247048",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699855",
          "weight": 16.67
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699892",
          "weight": 16.67
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1976,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1976,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_Benchmark_2026_Methodology.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_B_Providing_and_promoting_decent_work+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699924,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Responsible tax fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_tax_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Responsible tax fundamentals",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Financial Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Tax Policy & Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Corporate Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Stakeholder Accountability",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Country-by-Country Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Effective Tax Rate Disclosure"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Responsible tax fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var elements, indicatorScore, relevantRequirements, requirementsMet;\n\n  elements = [A, B, C];\n\n  relevantRequirements = elements.filter(function(x) {\n    return x !== 'Not Applicable';\n  });\n\n  requirementsMet = relevantRequirements.filter(function(x) {\n    return x === 'Yes';\n  });\n\n  indicatorScore = (requirementsMet.length / relevantRequirements.length) * 10.0;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115332",
          "name": "A"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115344",
          "name": "B"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115356",
          "name": "C"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_tax_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_tax_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699936,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Responsible tax fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_tax_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Responsible tax fundamentals",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_C_Acting_ethically.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_tax_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699941,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.17.A Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_A_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_Policy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.17.A Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_A_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_Policy+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699947,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.17.B Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption Process+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_B_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_Process+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.17.B Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption Process",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_B_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_Process+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699953,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.17.C Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption In Contractual Agreements+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_C_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_In_Contractual_Agreements+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.17.C Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption In Contractual Agreements",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_C_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_In_Contractual_Agreements+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699959,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+CSI.17.D Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption Complaint Mechanism+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_D_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_Complaint_Mechanism+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "CSI.17.D Anti-bribery and Anti-Corruption Complaint Mechanism",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": "{\"Yes\":\"10\",\"No\":\"0\"}",
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+CSI_17_D_Anti_bribery_and_Anti_Corruption_Complaint_Mechanism+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699966,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Anti-bribery and anti-corruption fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Anti-bribery and anti-corruption fundamentals",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~23699941",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699947",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699953",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699959",
          "weight": 25
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_C_Acting_ethically.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Anti_bribery_and_anti_corruption_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699980,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Formula",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": "Number",
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Lobbying & Political Engagement",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Political Contributions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Policy Influence Strategies"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [
        "World Benchmarking Alliance+Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group"
      ],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  var elements, indicatorScore, relevantRequirements, requirementsMet;\n\n  elements = [A, B, C, D];\n\n  relevantRequirements = elements.filter(function(x) {\n    return x !== 'Not Applicable';\n  });\n\n  requirementsMet = relevantRequirements.filter(function(x) {\n    return x === 'Yes';\n  });\n\n  indicatorScore = (requirementsMet.length / relevantRequirements.length) * 10.0;\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~18115416",
          "name": "A"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23252139",
          "name": "B"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23252151",
          "name": "C"
        },
        {
          "metric": "~18115451",
          "name": "D"
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699991,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals+World Benchmarking Alliance Research Group",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "score",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n  answer;\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_C_Acting_ethically.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Responsible_lobbying_and_political_engagement_fundamentals+World_Benchmarking_Alliance_Research_Group+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23699997,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Theme C - Acting ethically",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_C_Acting_ethically.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Theme C - Acting ethically",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~19247106",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699936",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699966",
          "weight": 25
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699991",
          "weight": 25
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1996,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1996,
      "calculations": [
        "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_Benchmark_2026_Methodology.json"
      ],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Theme_C_Acting_ethically+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 23700006,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Social Benchmark (2026 Methodology)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_Benchmark_2026_Methodology.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Social Benchmark (2026 Methodology)",
      "question": null,
      "metric_type": "Rating",
      "about": null,
      "methodology": null,
      "value_type": null,
      "value_options": [],
      "report_type": null,
      "assessment": "Community Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Social",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Human Rights Due Diligence",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Governance",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Public ESG Commitments",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Governance & Oversight",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability & ESG Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+ESG Integration into Business Strategy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Sustainability Reporting",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Risk Management",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Risk",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Supply Chain Transparency",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Labor Rights & Working Conditions",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Collective Bargaining",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Freedom of Association",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Responsibility",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Data Protection & Privacy",
        "Wikirate ESG Topics+Digital Rights"
      ],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": [
        {
          "metric": "~23699746",
          "weight": 45
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699911",
          "weight": 33
        },
        {
          "metric": "~23699997",
          "weight": 22
        }
      ],
      "answer": 1972,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1972,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_Benchmark_2026_Methodology+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24047326,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Social Dialogue Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_Dialogue_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Social Dialogue Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company have a public commitment to engage in social dialogue with appropriate parties for bipartite or tripartite negotiations, including workers, unions or equivalent worker bodies (where the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining is restricted under law)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Just Transition Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to ensure the transition to a low-carbon, resilient economy is fair and inclusive, tracking how companies integrate social equity, support workers and communities affected by the shift, and embed meaningful stakeholder engagement throughout their transition planning. The 2026 edition assessed 1,600 companies across multiple industries and sectors on three core indicators: fundamentals of social dialogue and stakeholder engagement, fundamentals of just transition planning, and fundamentals of decent work, workers and skills for a just transition. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond treating social impacts as separate from climate strategy, ensuring that workers and communities are included and empowered throughout the entire process, with decent work and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/just-transition|here]].",
      "methodology": "As one of the ILO’s four pillars of decent work, social dialogue should guarantee the effective<br>\nparticipation of workers, unions or equivalent worker bodies in meaningful negotiation so that they<br>\nhave the opportunity to influence decisions and outcomes. Companies should engage in continuous<br>\nsocial dialogue with these groups and, where necessary, with governments, to explore climate-related<br>\nrisks and opportunities and anticipate the impacts of the transition on workers and communities.<br>\nCompanies are expected to be transparent and inclusive of diverse racial, ethnic, gender and<br>\nsocioeconomic backgrounds to prevent exclusion of marginalised groups. By fostering continuous<br>\nsocial dialogue and inclusive stakeholder engagement, companies can make more equitable decisions that not only mitigate risks but are essential for long-term success.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nTo meet this element, the company must either:  <br>\n1\\. Explicitly commit to social dialogue with its workers and/or their representatives, whereby elements of negotiations within social dialogue processes are present; **<strong>OR</strong>** <br>\n2\\. Have a signed global framework agreement (GFA) with unions, or a just transition agreement covering most of the workforce.  <br>\n<br>\n**Clarifications and additional guidance:  **<br>\n**‚ Definition and scope of social dialogue  **<br>\nAccording to the International Labour Organisation (ILO) Guidance on Social Dialogue, it includes ‚all types of negotiation, consultation or simply exchange of information between, or among, representatives of governments, employers and workers, on issues of common interest relating to economic and social policy. Social dialogue takes many different forms. It can exist as a tripartite process, with the government as an official party to the dialogue or it may consist of bipartite relations only between labour and management (or trade unions and employers' organisations), with or without indirect government involvement.‚<br>\n<br>\n**‚ Distinction from stakeholder engagement  **<br>\nThis element emphasises social dialogue rather than stakeholder engagement, as the former takes place between social partners such as unions, employers, and sometimes governments, while the latter involves a broader range of parties. <br>\n<br>\n**‚ Insufficient evidence  **<br>\nIt is not sufficient for the company to disclose examples of social dialogue having occurred in the past, since that does not imply a commitment for it in the future. <br>\nIt is not sufficient for the company to disclose that collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) are present, since only CBAs cover specific aspects of management-employee relationship.<br>\n<br>\n**‚ Not evaluating Just Transition dialogue in this element  **<br>\nThis element does not assess whether social dialogue occurs on the topic of Just Transition; that is assessed by elements B, C and D under Indicator one.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1600,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1600,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_Dialogue_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24047337,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Just Transition Stakeholder Identification Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Just_Transition_Stakeholder_Identification_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Just Transition Stakeholder Identification Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the categories of stakeholders it engages with on a just transition and how they are identified (at a minimum including workers, unions or equivalent worker bodies where the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining is restricted under law, and other affected stakeholders)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Just Transition Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to ensure the transition to a low-carbon, resilient economy is fair and inclusive, tracking how companies integrate social equity, support workers and communities affected by the shift, and embed meaningful stakeholder engagement throughout their transition planning. The 2026 edition assessed 1,600 companies across multiple industries and sectors on three core indicators: fundamentals of social dialogue and stakeholder engagement, fundamentals of just transition planning, and fundamentals of decent work, workers and skills for a just transition. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond treating social impacts as separate from climate strategy, ensuring that workers and communities are included and empowered throughout the entire process, with decent work and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/just-transition|here]].",
      "methodology": "As one of the ILO’s four pillars of decent work, social dialogue should guarantee the effective<br>\nparticipation of workers, unions or equivalent worker bodies in meaningful negotiation so that they<br>\nhave the opportunity to influence decisions and outcomes. Companies should engage in continuous<br>\nsocial dialogue with these groups and, where necessary, with governments, to explore climate-related<br>\nrisks and opportunities and anticipate the impacts of the transition on workers and communities.<br>\nCompanies are expected to be transparent and inclusive of diverse racial, ethnic, gender and<br>\nsocioeconomic backgrounds to prevent exclusion of marginalised groups. By fostering continuous<br>\nsocial dialogue and inclusive stakeholder engagement, companies can make more equitable decisions that not only mitigate risks but are essential for long-term success.<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nTo meet this element, the company must: <br>\n‚ Disclose the categories of stakeholders it engages with on the topic of sustainability or its sustainability plan, for example clients, shareholders, suppliers and commercial partners, workers and their representatives, the public sector, and civil society. <br>\n‚ Include workers and/or their representatives in the stakeholder categories engaged.<br>\n‚ Make clear that a just transition or the social impacts of its sustainability plan are topics that the company engages on with the listed stakeholders.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1600,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1600,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Just_Transition_Stakeholder_Identification_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24047348,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Just Transition Stakeholder Engagement Process Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Just_Transition_Stakeholder_Engagement_Process_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Just Transition Stakeholder Engagement Process Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the steps it takes to engage with stakeholders (at a minimum including workers, unions or equivalent worker bodies where the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining is restricted under law, and affected stakeholders) as part of its approach to supporting just transitions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Just Transition Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to ensure the transition to a low-carbon, resilient economy is fair and inclusive, tracking how companies integrate social equity, support workers and communities affected by the shift, and embed meaningful stakeholder engagement throughout their transition planning. The 2026 edition assessed 1,600 companies across multiple industries and sectors on three core indicators: fundamentals of social dialogue and stakeholder engagement, fundamentals of just transition planning, and fundamentals of decent work, workers and skills for a just transition. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond treating social impacts as separate from climate strategy, ensuring that workers and communities are included and empowered throughout the entire process, with decent work and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/just-transition|here]].",
      "methodology": "As one of the ILO’s four pillars of decent work, social dialogue should guarantee the effective<br>\nparticipation of workers, unions or equivalent worker bodies in meaningful negotiation so that they<br>\nhave the opportunity to influence decisions and outcomes. Companies should engage in continuous<br>\nsocial dialogue with these groups and, where necessary, with governments, to explore climate-related<br>\nrisks and opportunities and anticipate the impacts of the transition on workers and communities.<br>\nCompanies are expected to be transparent and inclusive of diverse racial, ethnic, gender and<br>\nsocioeconomic backgrounds to prevent exclusion of marginalised groups. By fostering continuous<br>\nsocial dialogue and inclusive stakeholder engagement, companies can make more equitable decisions that not only mitigate risks but are essential for long-term success.<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nTo meet this element, the company must demonstrate that: <br>\n‚ Clear and ongoing engagement steps are outlined, such as consultation processes, surveys, meetings, other forms of stakeholder engagement.<br>\n‚ Workers and/or their representatives are included in the stakeholder categories engaged.<br>\n‚ The engagement clearly addresses just transition or other social impacts related to the company‚s sustainability transition.    <br>\n<br>\n**Clarifications and additional guidance:  **<br>\n**‚ Examples of Just Transition topics **<br>\nSome examples of Just Transition topics that are accepted for this element are: just transition planning; creating and providing or supporting access to green and decent jobs for an inclusive and balanced workforce; retaining and re- and/or up-skilling workers for an inclusive, balanced workforce; social protection and social impact management; and advocacy for policies and regulation supporting a just transition.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1600,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1600,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Just_Transition_Stakeholder_Engagement_Process_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24047359,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Just Transition Stakeholder Engagement Practice",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Just_Transition_Stakeholder_Engagement_Practice.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Just Transition Stakeholder Engagement Practice",
      "question": "Does the company demonstrate social dialogue and meaningful engagement with stakeholders (at a minimum including workers, unions or equivalent worker bodies where the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining is restricted under law, and affected stakeholders) on a just transition?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Just Transition Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to ensure the transition to a low-carbon, resilient economy is fair and inclusive, tracking how companies integrate social equity, support workers and communities affected by the shift, and embed meaningful stakeholder engagement throughout their transition planning. The 2026 edition assessed 1,600 companies across multiple industries and sectors on three core indicators: fundamentals of social dialogue and stakeholder engagement, fundamentals of just transition planning, and fundamentals of decent work, workers and skills for a just transition. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond treating social impacts as separate from climate strategy, ensuring that workers and communities are included and empowered throughout the entire process, with decent work and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/just-transition|here]].",
      "methodology": "As one of the ILO’s four pillars of decent work, social dialogue should guarantee the effective<br>\nparticipation of workers, unions or equivalent worker bodies in meaningful negotiation so that they<br>\nhave the opportunity to influence decisions and outcomes. Companies should engage in continuous<br>\nsocial dialogue with these groups and, where necessary, with governments, to explore climate-related<br>\nrisks and opportunities and anticipate the impacts of the transition on workers and communities.<br>\nCompanies are expected to be transparent and inclusive of diverse racial, ethnic, gender and<br>\nsocioeconomic backgrounds to prevent exclusion of marginalised groups. By fostering continuous<br>\nsocial dialogue and inclusive stakeholder engagement, companies can make more equitable decisions that not only mitigate risks but are essential for long-term success.<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nTo meet this element, the company must demonstrate that: <br>\n‚ It carried out social dialogue processes, or has some in progress.<br>\n‚ Such processes include, at minimum, workers and/or their representatives, and incorporate mechanisms for meaningful dialogue with other affected stakeholders, such as vulnerable groups.<br>\n‚ The dialogue and engagement should specifically address the topic of Just Transition.<br>\n‚ It discloses how frequently and/or depth of its engagement with affected stakeholders.<br>\n<br>\n**Clarifications and additional guidance: **<br>\n**‚ Examples of Just Transition topics **<br>\nSome examples of Just Transition topics that are accepted for this element are: just transition planning; creating and providing or supporting access to green and decent jobs for an inclusive and balanced workforce; retaining and re- and/or up-skilling workers for an inclusive, balanced workforce; social protection and social impact management; and advocacy for policies and regulation supporting a just transition.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1600,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1600,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Just_Transition_Stakeholder_Engagement_Practice+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24047370,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Social Dialogue Integration in Just Transition Planning",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_Dialogue_Integration_in_Just_Transition_Planning.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Social Dialogue Integration in Just Transition Planning",
      "question": "Does the company demonstrate how it engages in social dialogue and with stakeholders in the development of its just transition planning \nOR \nDoes the company demonstrate how its just transition planning relates to social impacts from the company‚ own decarbonization plan or sustainability strategy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Just Transition Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to ensure the transition to a low-carbon, resilient economy is fair and inclusive, tracking how companies integrate social equity, support workers and communities affected by the shift, and embed meaningful stakeholder engagement throughout their transition planning. The 2026 edition assessed 1,600 companies across multiple industries and sectors on three core indicators: fundamentals of social dialogue and stakeholder engagement, fundamentals of just transition planning, and fundamentals of decent work, workers and skills for a just transition. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond treating social impacts as separate from climate strategy, ensuring that workers and communities are included and empowered throughout the entire process, with decent work and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/just-transition|here]].",
      "methodology": "Effective planning ensures accountability in ensuring a just transition. Companies should base their<br>\njust transition plans on commitments towards ensuring human rights, decent work and reducing<br>\ninequalities, with a focus on vulnerable groups. Through ongoing social dialogue (see indicator 1),<br>\ncompanies should make robust, measurable and evidence-based plans covering all business activities, with short- and long-term goals aligned with broader climate actions. Companies should also require their business partners to mitigate social impacts of the transition on workers and communities. <br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nTo meet this element, the company‚s just transition planning should be grounded in either: <br>\n1\\. Social dialogue and stakeholder engagement; **<strong>OR</strong> **<br>\n2\\. A thorough assessment of the social impacts arising from its own sustainability transition plan. <br>\n<br>\nThis element is not limited strictly to the existence of a formal just transition ‚plan.‚Broader just transition efforts are also recognised, as long as they demonstrate a clear process of planning to minimise the social impacts of the company‚s sustainability transition.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1600,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1600,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Social_Dialogue_Integration_in_Just_Transition_Planning+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24047381,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Just Transition Worker Impact Indicators",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Just_Transition_Worker_Impact_Indicators.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Just Transition Worker Impact Indicators",
      "question": "Does the company have time-bound, measurable indicators to mitigate the impacts of sustainability transitions on workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Just Transition Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to ensure the transition to a low-carbon, resilient economy is fair and inclusive, tracking how companies integrate social equity, support workers and communities affected by the shift, and embed meaningful stakeholder engagement throughout their transition planning. The 2026 edition assessed 1,600 companies across multiple industries and sectors on three core indicators: fundamentals of social dialogue and stakeholder engagement, fundamentals of just transition planning, and fundamentals of decent work, workers and skills for a just transition. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond treating social impacts as separate from climate strategy, ensuring that workers and communities are included and empowered throughout the entire process, with decent work and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/just-transition|here]].",
      "methodology": "Effective planning ensures accountability in ensuring a just transition. Companies should base their<br>\njust transition plans on commitments towards ensuring human rights, decent work and reducing<br>\ninequalities, with a focus on vulnerable groups. Through ongoing social dialogue (see indicator 1),<br>\ncompanies should make robust, measurable and evidence-based plans covering all business activities, with short- and long-term goals aligned with broader climate actions. Companies should also require their business partners to mitigate social impacts of the transition on workers and communities. <br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nTo meet this element, the company must demonstrate that: <br>\n‚ It has a time-bound, measurable indicator(s) to mitigate the social impacts of its sustainability transition on workers.  <br>\n‚ Indicators must address transition-related social impacts. The indicators should focus on mitigating social impacts that arise as a result of the company‚s sustainability transition. General employee welfare measures are not sufficient to meet this element. <br>\n‚ Indicators must be time-bound and specific. Accepted indicators should relate to defined actions or milestones within a specific timeframe. General commitments, or a program without a clear timeline, are not accepted. <br>\n<br>\n **Clarifications and additional guidance: **<br>\n**‚ Stakeholder categorisation  **<br>\nThis element specifically refers to the company‚s direct employees and workers engaged in its own operations. Indicator 2 distinguishes among three stakeholder groups: workers (Indicator 2B), affected stakeholders (2C), and business relationships (2D). Female workers, for example, are categorised under ‚workers‚ (2B) rather than under ‚vulnerable groups‚ or ‚affected stakeholders‚ (2C). Similarly, supply chain workers should be assessed under ‚business relationships‚ (2D), not as part of the company‚s own workforce. Maintaining this distinction ensures consistency across assessments and avoids misclassification or double counting of mitigation efforts. <br>\n<br>\n**‚ Indicators can be process-based, not just numerical. **<br>\nSocial impact mitigation often involves qualitative or process-based approaches. Project-specific targets with a defined timeframe (e.g., a socialisation or consultation plan involving stakeholders) are acceptable, even if they are not expressed in numerical terms.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1600,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1600,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Just_Transition_Worker_Impact_Indicators+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24047392,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Just Transition Affected Stakeholder Impact Indicators",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Just_Transition_Affected_Stakeholder_Impact_Indicators.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Just Transition Affected Stakeholder Impact Indicators",
      "question": "Does the company have time-bound, measurable indicators to mitigate the impacts of sustainability transitions on affected stakeholders, including vulnerable groups?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Just Transition Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to ensure the transition to a low-carbon, resilient economy is fair and inclusive, tracking how companies integrate social equity, support workers and communities affected by the shift, and embed meaningful stakeholder engagement throughout their transition planning. The 2026 edition assessed 1,600 companies across multiple industries and sectors on three core indicators: fundamentals of social dialogue and stakeholder engagement, fundamentals of just transition planning, and fundamentals of decent work, workers and skills for a just transition. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond treating social impacts as separate from climate strategy, ensuring that workers and communities are included and empowered throughout the entire process, with decent work and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/just-transition|here]].",
      "methodology": "Effective planning ensures accountability in ensuring a just transition. Companies should base their<br>\njust transition plans on commitments towards ensuring human rights, decent work and reducing<br>\ninequalities, with a focus on vulnerable groups. Through ongoing social dialogue (see indicator 1),<br>\ncompanies should make robust, measurable and evidence-based plans covering all business activities, with short- and long-term goals aligned with broader climate actions. Companies should also require their business partners to mitigate social impacts of the transition on workers and communities. <br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nTo meet this element, the company must demonstrate that:  <br>\n‚ It has a time-bound, measurable indicator(s) to mitigate the social impacts of its sustainability transition on affected stakeholders, including vulnerable groups. <br>\n‚ Indicators must address social impacts of its transition. General investments in community welfare are not sufficient to meet this element. The company‚s efforts must be directly tied to mitigating the social impacts of its sustainability transition. For example, this may include supporting economic diversification in its fossil fuel-communities or establishing profit-sharing mechanisms in renewable energy projects to address conflicts over land use and natural resources. <br>\n‚ Indicators must be time-bound and specific. Accepted indicators should relate to defined actions or milestones within a specific timeframe. General commitments, or a program without a clear timeline, are not accepted. <br>\n<br>\n **Clarifications and additional guidance: **<br>\n**‚ Stakeholder categorisation**<br>\nIndicator 2 distinguishes between three groups: workers (covered under Indicator 2B), affected stakeholders (under 2C), and business relationships (under 2D). For example, female workers are categorised under ‚workers‚ (2B) rather than under ‚vulnerable groups‚ or ‚affected stakeholders‚ (2C). Maintaining this distinction ensures consistency across the assessment and prevents misclassification or double counting of social impact mitigation efforts. <br>\n<br>\n** ‚ Indicators can be process-based, not just numerical **<br>\nSocial impact mitigation often involves qualitative or process-based approaches. Project-specific targets with a defined timeframe (e.g., a socialisation or consultation plan involving stakeholders) are acceptable, even if they are not expressed in numerical terms.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1600,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1600,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Just_Transition_Affected_Stakeholder_Impact_Indicators+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24047403,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Just Transition Business Relationship Impact Indicators",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Just_Transition_Business_Relationship_Impact_Indicators.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Just Transition Business Relationship Impact Indicators",
      "question": "Does the company have time-bound, measurable indicators to mitigate the impacts of sustainability transitions on its business relationships?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Just Transition Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to ensure the transition to a low-carbon, resilient economy is fair and inclusive, tracking how companies integrate social equity, support workers and communities affected by the shift, and embed meaningful stakeholder engagement throughout their transition planning. The 2026 edition assessed 1,600 companies across multiple industries and sectors on three core indicators: fundamentals of social dialogue and stakeholder engagement, fundamentals of just transition planning, and fundamentals of decent work, workers and skills for a just transition. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond treating social impacts as separate from climate strategy, ensuring that workers and communities are included and empowered throughout the entire process, with decent work and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/just-transition|here]].",
      "methodology": "Effective planning ensures accountability in ensuring a just transition. Companies should base their<br>\njust transition plans on commitments towards ensuring human rights, decent work and reducing<br>\ninequalities, with a focus on vulnerable groups. Through ongoing social dialogue (see indicator 1),<br>\ncompanies should make robust, measurable and evidence-based plans covering all business activities, with short- and long-term goals aligned with broader climate actions. Companies should also require their business partners to mitigate social impacts of the transition on workers and communities. <br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nTo meet this element, the company must demonstrate that: <br>\n‚ It has a time-bound, measurable indicator(s) to mitigate the social impacts of its sustainability transition on its business relationships, including suppliers and consumers. <br>\n‚ Indicators must address social impacts of its transition. The purpose is to mitigate social impacts resulting from the transition. Indicators that only cover supplier screening or compliance processes, without addressing resulting impacts on stakeholders, are not sufficient. <br>\n‚ Indicators must be time-bound and specific. Accepted indicators should relate to defined actions or milestones within a specific timeframe. General commitments, or a program without a clear timeline are not accepted. <br>\n<br>\n**Clarifications and additional guidance: **<br>\n**‚ Stakeholder categorisation**<br>\nIndicator 2 distinguishes between three groups: workers (covered under Indicator 2B), affected stakeholders (under 2C), and business relationships (under 2D). Supply chain workers should be assessed under business relationships (2D), not as part of the company‚s own workforce. Conversely, 2B refers specifically to the company‚s direct employees and operations. This distinction ensures consistency across the assessment and avoids double-counting or misclassification of social impact mitigation efforts. <br>\n<br>\n**‚ Indicators can be process-based, not just numerical **<br>\nSocial impact mitigation often involves qualitative or process-based approaches. Project-specific targets with a defined timeframe (e.g., a socialisation or consultation plan involving stakeholders) are acceptable, even if they are not expressed in numerical terms. <br>\n<br>\n**‚ Clarification on Consumer**<br>\nConsumers of energy and products, especially those affected by lack of access to low carbon energy or future sustainable offerings. For example, by disclosing by when it will provide or make available clean energy or another novel sustainable solution to a specific number of consumers.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1600,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1600,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Just_Transition_Business_Relationship_Impact_Indicators+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24047414,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Decent Jobs Commitment in Sustainability Transition",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Decent_Jobs_Commitment_in_Sustainability_Transition.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Decent Jobs Commitment in Sustainability Transition",
      "question": "Does the company have a public commitment to creating or supporting access to decent jobs as part of a sustainability transition?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Just Transition Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to ensure the transition to a low-carbon, resilient economy is fair and inclusive, tracking how companies integrate social equity, support workers and communities affected by the shift, and embed meaningful stakeholder engagement throughout their transition planning. The 2026 edition assessed 1,600 companies across multiple industries and sectors on three core indicators: fundamentals of social dialogue and stakeholder engagement, fundamentals of just transition planning, and fundamentals of decent work, workers and skills for a just transition. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond treating social impacts as separate from climate strategy, ensuring that workers and communities are included and empowered throughout the entire process, with decent work and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/just-transition|here]].",
      "methodology": "A sustainability transition will likely require a change in the nature of work. Companies should ensure<br>\nthat they have the skills they need to continue their sustainability transition and not be held back by<br>\nskills gaps. Companies also need to minimise the impact of the transition by creating and providing or<br>\nsupporting access to new green and decent jobs. Creating decent jobs on the journey to a more<br>\nsustainable future and ensuring that the needed skills are in place are intertwined processes, which<br>\nrequire companies to plan, understand the contexts they work in and make the best possible use of<br>\nlocal circumstances. Where possible, companies should retain and re-educate their workers to take<br>\nthem along in the sustainability transition.<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nTo meet this element, the company must either:  <br>\n‚ Commit to the creation of new or future jobs; **<strong>OR</strong>**<br>\n‚ Commit to supporting access to decent employment opportunities. <br>\n<br>\n** Clarifications and additional guidance:  **<br>\n**‚ Sustainability transition framing **<br>\nThe commitment must be clearly framed within the context of a sustainability transition, such as a shift to low-carbon operations, circular economy models, or climate resilience. <br>\n<br>\n**‚ Insufficient evidence ** <br>\nActions aimed at creating jobs that already exist within the company‚s current operations are insufficient.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1600,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1600,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Decent_Jobs_Commitment_in_Sustainability_Transition+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24047425,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Worker Reskilling and Upskilling Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Worker_Reskilling_and_Upskilling_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Worker Reskilling and Upskilling Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company have a public commitment to re-and/or up-skill workers that are displaced by a sustainability transition?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Just Transition Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to ensure the transition to a low-carbon, resilient economy is fair and inclusive, tracking how companies integrate social equity, support workers and communities affected by the shift, and embed meaningful stakeholder engagement throughout their transition planning. The 2026 edition assessed 1,600 companies across multiple industries and sectors on three core indicators: fundamentals of social dialogue and stakeholder engagement, fundamentals of just transition planning, and fundamentals of decent work, workers and skills for a just transition. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond treating social impacts as separate from climate strategy, ensuring that workers and communities are included and empowered throughout the entire process, with decent work and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/just-transition|here]].",
      "methodology": "A sustainability transition will likely require a change in the nature of work. Companies should ensure<br>\nthat they have the skills they need to continue their sustainability transition and not be held back by<br>\nskills gaps. Companies also need to minimise the impact of the transition by creating and providing or<br>\nsupporting access to new green and decent jobs. Creating decent jobs on the journey to a more<br>\nsustainable future and ensuring that the needed skills are in place are intertwined processes, which<br>\nrequire companies to plan, understand the contexts they work in and make the best possible use of<br>\nlocal circumstances. Where possible, companies should retain and re-educate their workers to take<br>\nthem along in the sustainability transition.<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nTo meet this element, the company must:  <br>\n‚ Explicitly commit to reskilling or upskilling workers who are or may be displaced or affected by the sustainability transition.  <br>\n<br>\n** Clarifications and additional guidance:  **<br>\n**‚ Sustainability transition framing **<br>\nThe commitment must be clearly framed within the context of a sustainability transition. <br>\n<br>\n**‚ Insufficient evidence  **<br>\nExisting training programs or numbers of trained workers are not sufficient unless part of a broader plan to equip the workforce for the transition. <br>\n<br>\n**‚ Key stakeholder groups **<br>\nThe company should consider: <br>\n-** At the minimum, worker**s ‚ including direct employees and/or supplier workers. <br>\n**Affected stakeholders** ‚ including individuals or groups who are directly or indirectly, intentionally or unintentionally, impacted by a company‚s activities, decisions, or inaction. Such as, local communities, civil society organisations, consumers, customers, and vulnerable groups.  <br>\nThe commitment must explicitly include workers to meet this element.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1600,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1600,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Worker_Reskilling_and_Upskilling_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24047436,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Skills Gap Identification Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Skills_Gap_Identification_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Skills Gap Identification Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose its processes for identifying skills gaps for workers and affected stakeholders in the context of the company‚ decarbonisation plan or sustainability strategy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Just Transition Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to ensure the transition to a low-carbon, resilient economy is fair and inclusive, tracking how companies integrate social equity, support workers and communities affected by the shift, and embed meaningful stakeholder engagement throughout their transition planning. The 2026 edition assessed 1,600 companies across multiple industries and sectors on three core indicators: fundamentals of social dialogue and stakeholder engagement, fundamentals of just transition planning, and fundamentals of decent work, workers and skills for a just transition. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond treating social impacts as separate from climate strategy, ensuring that workers and communities are included and empowered throughout the entire process, with decent work and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/just-transition|here]].",
      "methodology": "A sustainability transition will likely require a change in the nature of work. Companies should ensure<br>\nthat they have the skills they need to continue their sustainability transition and not be held back by<br>\nskills gaps. Companies also need to minimise the impact of the transition by creating and providing or<br>\nsupporting access to new green and decent jobs. Creating decent jobs on the journey to a more<br>\nsustainable future and ensuring that the needed skills are in place are intertwined processes, which<br>\nrequire companies to plan, understand the contexts they work in and make the best possible use of<br>\nlocal circumstances. Where possible, companies should retain and re-educate their workers to take<br>\nthem along in the sustainability transition.<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nTo meet this element, the company must:  <br>\n‚ Report the number or share of employees that have been laid off during the reporting year.  <br>\n<br>\n** Clarifications and additional guidance: **<br>\n‚ The voluntary turnover rate is not accepted (unless the company also reports the total turnover rate and thereby indicates the involuntary turnover rate), as it captures resignations and retirements rather than job losses due to transitions.  <br>\n‚  The involuntary turnover rate of number of severance packages are accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1600,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1600,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Skills_Gap_Identification_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24047447,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sustainability Transition Impact Assessment Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainability_Transition_Impact_Assessment_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sustainability Transition Impact Assessment Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company assess and disclose the impacts of their sustainability transition plans on workers and affected stakeholders?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Just Transition Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to ensure the transition to a low-carbon, resilient economy is fair and inclusive, tracking how companies integrate social equity, support workers and communities affected by the shift, and embed meaningful stakeholder engagement throughout their transition planning. The 2026 edition assessed 1,600 companies across multiple industries and sectors on three core indicators: fundamentals of social dialogue and stakeholder engagement, fundamentals of just transition planning, and fundamentals of decent work, workers and skills for a just transition. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond treating social impacts as separate from climate strategy, ensuring that workers and communities are included and empowered throughout the entire process, with decent work and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/just-transition|here]].",
      "methodology": "A sustainability transition will likely require a change in the nature of work. Companies should ensure<br>\nthat they have the skills they need to continue their sustainability transition and not be held back by<br>\nskills gaps. Companies also need to minimise the impact of the transition by creating and providing or<br>\nsupporting access to new green and decent jobs. Creating decent jobs on the journey to a more<br>\nsustainable future and ensuring that the needed skills are in place are intertwined processes, which<br>\nrequire companies to plan, understand the contexts they work in and make the best possible use of<br>\nlocal circumstances. Where possible, companies should retain and re-educate their workers to take<br>\nthem along in the sustainability transition.<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nTo meet this element, the company must:  <br>\n‚ Explain how it assesses the impacts of its sustainability transition on both workers and affected stakeholders. <br>\n‚ Disclose the results of its assessment of the impacts of its sustainability transition on both workers and affected stakeholders. <br>\n<br>\n** Clarifications and additional guidance: **<br>\n**‚ Key stakeholder groups **<br>\nThe company should consider **both: **<br>\n**Workers **‚ including direct employees and/or supplier workers. <br>\n**Affected stakeholders** ‚ including individuals or groups who are directly or indirectly, intentionally or unintentionally, impacted by a company‚s activities, decisions, or inaction. Such as, local communities, civil society organisations, consumers, customers, and vulnerable groups.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1600,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1600,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainability_Transition_Impact_Assessment_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24047458,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Annual Workforce Redundancy Rate",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Annual_Workforce_Redundancy_Rate.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Annual Workforce Redundancy Rate",
      "question": "Does the company report the proportion of its workforce that is made redundant annually?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Just Transition Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to ensure the transition to a low-carbon, resilient economy is fair and inclusive, tracking how companies integrate social equity, support workers and communities affected by the shift, and embed meaningful stakeholder engagement throughout their transition planning. The 2026 edition assessed 1,600 companies across multiple industries and sectors on three core indicators: fundamentals of social dialogue and stakeholder engagement, fundamentals of just transition planning, and fundamentals of decent work, workers and skills for a just transition. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond treating social impacts as separate from climate strategy, ensuring that workers and communities are included and empowered throughout the entire process, with decent work and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/just-transition|here]].",
      "methodology": "A sustainability transition will likely require a change in the nature of work. Companies should ensure<br>\nthat they have the skills they need to continue their sustainability transition and not be held back by<br>\nskills gaps. Companies also need to minimise the impact of the transition by creating and providing or<br>\nsupporting access to new green and decent jobs. Creating decent jobs on the journey to a more<br>\nsustainable future and ensuring that the needed skills are in place are intertwined processes, which<br>\nrequire companies to plan, understand the contexts they work in and make the best possible use of<br>\nlocal circumstances. Where possible, companies should retain and re-educate their workers to take<br>\nthem along in the sustainability transition.<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe company reports the number or share of employees that have been laid off during the reporting year.<br>\nThe company can either report the rate of redundancy, the involuntary turnover rate, the number of severance packages, or other similar metrics.<br>\nThe voluntary turnover rate alone is not accepted, as it captures resignations and retirements rather than job losses due to transitions. However, if the company reports both the total turnover rate and the voluntary turnover rate, this is sufficient as the involuntary turnover rate is implied.<br>\nIt is not necessary to cite the reason for dismissal (e.g. automation, plant closure), though this is noted as best practice.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 1600,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 1600,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Annual_Workforce_Redundancy_Rate+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24133743,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment Policy Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Equality_and_Women_s_Empowerment_Policy_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment Policy Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to gender equality and women's empowerment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality makes a public commitment to gender equality<br>\n(e.g. signatory to the UN Women’s Empowerment Principles). It has a stand-alone gender strategy or<br>\nhas incorporated gender equality and women’s empowerment into its business strategy, which<br>\nincludes specific targets that are monitored regularly.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The company either:<br>\n         a.Is a signatory to the UN Women's Empowerment Principles in all locations of operation; or<br>\n         b.Has a high-level  policy  commitment to gender equality and women's empowerment (not only in a specific setting, location, or function). This commitment must be in a policy document or webpage and cover the whole company, not a subsidiary or only certain locations.<br>\n2\\.It is not sufficient if the company discloses programmes/initiatives/targets on gender equality or women's empowerment. <br>\n3\\.                        Being a signatory to other external initiatives or programs as well as disclosure related to external gender equality or women's empowerment rankings or scores is not sufficient for this element.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Equality_and_Women_s_Empowerment_Policy_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24133759,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment Strategy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Equality_and_Women_s_Empowerment_Strategy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment Strategy",
      "question": "Does the company have a gender strategy or has it integrated gender equality and women's empowerment into its business strategy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality makes a public commitment to gender equality<br>\n(e.g. signatory to the UN Women’s Empowerment Principles). It has a stand-alone gender strategy or<br>\nhas incorporated gender equality and women’s empowerment into its business strategy, which<br>\nincludes specific targets that are monitored regularly.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1. The company has a gender strategy or has integrated gender equality and women's empowerment into its business strategy. <br>\n2. The gender strategy (or incorporation of gender into another strategy) must explicitly mention gender equality and/or women's empowerment and go beyond general support for diversity and inclusion. This can be part of its sustainability or diversity and inclusion strategy. <br>\n3. The strategy must cover a company's entire value chain (not only the business or only the supply chain). The strategy must, at a minimum, address both the workplace and supply chain.<br>\n4. The strategy should be broad and not focused only on a specific issue (e.g. representation or pay). Examples of focus areas:<br>\n    1. Pay<br>\n    2. Representation<br>\n    3. Leadership and development",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Equality_and_Women_s_Empowerment_Strategy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24133775,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Workplace Gender Equality Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workplace_Gender_Equality_Targets.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Workplace Gender Equality Targets",
      "question": "Has the company identified specific, timebound targets on gender equality and women empowerment with regard to its workplace?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Gender targets help a company prioritise delivery on its gender strategy. They facilitate a<br>\ncompany’s ability to adapt and change through forward planning by increasing its resilience,<br>\nmanaging risks and protecting workers, the company and society at large.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1. The company discloses one or more targets on gender equality or women's empowerment in the workplace e.g.:<br>\n    1. Representation (e.g. gender equality in leadership)<br>\n    2. Closing the gender pay gap<br>\n    3. Improving women's health and well-being<br>\n    4. Preventing violence and harassment <br>\n2. Please note that the list provided is tentative and not exhaustive. It is intended as a starting point and may not cover all items or issues. If you identify anything missing or have additional information that may be relevant, please flag it to us.<br>\n3. Reporting on only 1 target is sufficient.<br>\n4. The target(s) must be time-bound, forward-looking or was achieved in the reporting year of the assessment.<br>\n5. Reporting of having met targets in the past beyond the reporting year cannot be accepted. <br>\n6. Targets can be at the subsidiary level but are not accepted if only cited on a subsidiary website or in a subsidiary report.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workplace_Gender_Equality_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24133791,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Workplace Gender Equality Target Progress Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workplace_Gender_Equality_Target_Progress_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Workplace Gender Equality Target Progress Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose progress against its targets for gender equality and women's empowerment in its workplace?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Gender targets help a company prioritise delivery on its gender strategy. They facilitate a<br>\ncompany’s ability to adapt and change through forward planning by increasing its resilience,<br>\nmanaging risks and protecting workers, the company and society at large.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses progress against its targets for gender equality and women's empowerment in its workplace.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workplace_Gender_Equality_Target_Progress_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24133807,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supply Chain Gender Equality Targets",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Gender_Equality_Targets.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supply Chain Gender Equality Targets",
      "question": "Has the company identified specific, timebound targets on gender equality and women's empowerment with regard to its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Gender targets help a company prioritise delivery on its gender strategy. They facilitate a<br>\ncompany’s ability to adapt and change through forward planning by increasing its resilience,<br>\nmanaging risks and protecting workers, the company and society at large.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1. The company discloses one or more targets on gender equality or women's empowerment in the supply chain e.g.:<br>\n    1. Representation (e.g. gender equality in leadership)<br>\n    2. Closing the gender pay gap<br>\n    3. Improving women's health and well-being<br>\n    4. Preventing violence and harassment <br>\n    5. Other<br>\n2. Reporting on only 1 target is sufficient.<br>\n3. The target(s) must be time-bound, forward-looking or was achieved in the reporting year of the assessment.<br>\n4. Reporting of having met targets in the past beyond the reporting year cannot be accepted. <br>\n5. Targets can be at the subsidiary level but are not accepted if only cited on a subsidiary website or in a subsidiary report.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Gender_Equality_Targets+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24133823,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supply Chain Gender Equality Target Progress Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Gender_Equality_Target_Progress_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supply Chain Gender Equality Target Progress Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose progress against its targets for gender equality and women's empowerment in its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Gender targets help a company prioritise delivery on its gender strategy. They facilitate a<br>\ncompany’s ability to adapt and change through forward planning by increasing its resilience,<br>\nmanaging risks and protecting workers, the company and society at large.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses progress against the targets for gender equality and women's empowerment in its supply chain mentioned in GEB.A02.C",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Gender_Equality_Target_Progress_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24133839,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Gender Equality Accountability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Equality_Accountability.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Gender Equality Accountability",
      "question": "Does the company have an individual (or multiple individuals) responsible for gender equality and women's empowerment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality appoints specific individuals with direct and<br>\noverall responsibility for gender equality and women’s empowerment across the company and has<br>\nthem report on progress against targets to the highest levels of leadership. It may also undertake a<br>\nself- or third-party assessment and/or certification on gender equality.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.There should be a clear and specific mention to gender within the scope covered by the person(s) role or department (e.g. if there is evidence of a head of Diversity & Inclusion/ CSR / sustainability and gender is mentioned as falling into scope of this department, this would be sufficient)<br>\n<br>\n2\\.If there is a dedicated  committee‚ that clearly includes gender within its scope, this is sufficient and would be evidence of multiple individuals responsible.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Equality_Accountability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24133855,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Gender Equality Assessment or Certification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Equality_Assessment_or_Certification.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Gender Equality Assessment or Certification",
      "question": "Has the company undertaken a self-assessment or third-party assessment and/or certification for gender equality (e.g. EDGE, WGEA Employer of Choice, Arborus-GEEIS*, UNDP Gender Equality Seal, WEPs-GAT)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality appoints specific individuals with direct and<br>\noverall responsibility for gender equality and women’s empowerment across the company and has<br>\nthem report on progress against targets to the highest levels of leadership. It may also undertake a<br>\nself- or third-party assessment and/or certification on gender equality.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The parent company must be awarded the third-party gender assessment or certification   not only specific subsidiaries <br>\n<br>\n2\\.The company has disclosure on a  self-assessment‚ tool that they used, e.g. WEPs GAP or the UNDP Gender Equality Seal.<br>\n<br>\nRecognition in other rankings (e.g. Bloomberg GEI, Equileap Top 100, Corporate Equality Index) without disclosing the full assessment is not sufficient.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Equality_Assessment_or_Certification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24133871,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Gender-Related Human Rights Salience Assessment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Related_Human_Rights_Salience_Assessment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Gender-Related Human Rights Salience Assessment",
      "question": "Does the company assess and prioritise gender-related human rights impacts as being salient?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality incorporates gender-related human rights<br>\nimpacts that specifically affect women and girls (e.g. sexual harassment, human trafficking, gender discrimination) into its human rights due diligence process.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The company assesses and prioritises gender-related human rights impacts as being salient.<br>\n<br>\n2\\.The company either:<br>\na.Screens for at least 1 gender-related human rights impacts as part of its human rights' due diligence process. Screening cannot be limited to the supply chain audit programme. There must be evidence of how this data feeds into a wider risk assessment and identification process.<br>\nb.Has assessed and prioritized at least 1 gender-related human rights impact as being salient (i.e., the most severe and potentially irremediable if not addressed).<br>\n<br>\n3\\.The assessment should describe how it determines its salient risks and disclose what they are i.e. those with most severe negative impacts on people affected by the company's activities.<br>\n<br>\n4\\.The company discloses a description of the process for assessing its gender-related human rights risks and impacts by describing how it has determined which of its human rights risks are most salient, including the social, economic, geographical or other factors considered in the assessment.<br>\nAn audit alone is not sufficient for human rights risk identification and assessment. A materiality assessment alone is not sufficient as this is different to a saliency assessment as usually considers risk to business, as well as, risk to people.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Related_Human_Rights_Salience_Assessment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24133887,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Women's Inclusion in Risk Identification Process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Women_s_Inclusion_in_Risk_Identification_Process.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Women's Inclusion in Risk Identification Process",
      "question": "Does the company engage with women as part of its risk identification and assessment process?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality incorporates gender-related human rights<br>\nimpacts that specifically affect women and girls (e.g. sexual harassment, human trafficking, gender discrimination) into its human rights due diligence process.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The company engages with women as part of its risk identification and assessment process.<br>\n<br>\n2\\.The company consults with stakeholders as part of its risk identification and assessment process. The evidence must include, at a minimum:<br>\na.with which stakeholder the company has engaged. The stakeholder must have a clear focus on gender or women's empowerment, or be a potentially impacted woman/women; and <br>\nb.how it engaged with the stakeholders (e.g., via surveys, interviews, roundtables, one-to-one consultations).<br>\n<br>\n3\\.It must be clear the company explicitly sought women's inputs   for example, if a varied group was consulted and the group includes women, this will not be sufficient (e.g. all employees are consulted, and a part of the employees are women). Instead, it must be clear the company either specifically addressed women in the consultation or analysed their feedback separately to identify their point of view.<br>\n<br>\nIt must be clear that the stakeholders affected are those identified as part of the human rights due diligence process and not as part of a materiality assessment or general stakeholder engagement.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Women_s_Inclusion_in_Risk_Identification_Process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24133903,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Worker Grievance Mechanism Accessibility",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Worker_Grievance_Mechanism_Accessibility.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Worker Grievance Mechanism Accessibility",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it has one or more mechanism(s), or participates in a third-party or shared mechanism, accessible to all workers to raise complaints or concerns related to the company without fear of reprisals?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality has a grievance mechanism which considers and<br>\naddresses the additional barriers women face to access and/or use these mechanisms (e.g. allowing<br>\nfor anonymity) and requires the same from its suppliers. It recognises that women employees may<br>\nface additional barriers to accessing and using the mechanism and obtaining an<br>\neffective remedy.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe company indicates it has one or more formal grievance mechanisms available to raise complaints or concerns related to the company. It should include the following:<br>\n1\\.Be available to **all workers** in the company's own operations.<br>\n2\\.Ensure **both anonymous and non-anonymous **reporting.<br>\n Disclosure of an  option  to report anonymously is accepted <br>\n If an email is provided, it is assumed to provide non-anonymous reporting.<br>\n All reports are considered regardless of whether they are anonymous or non-anonymous.<br>\n It is accepted if anonymous reporting is conditional on local laws, but not if it is available in only some locations that is not due to local laws. <br>\n3\\.The complainant should be able to report on **all aspects of human rights**, not only specific rights (e.g. discrimination).<br>\n An explicit reference to human rights is not required but it must be clear to stakeholders that a channel/mechanism designed to cover other topics (e.g. a corruption hotline) can be used to raise human rights complaints or concerns as well. <br>\n It is sufficient if reports can be made on violations of a code of conduct which includes human rights. <br>\n4\\.The company should ensure **non-retaliation** for raising complaints. <br>\n5\\.The mechanism needs to be available in** all appropriate languages**: e.g. if the channel is only available in one language, the company should indicate the reason behind that choice.<br>\n<br>\nThe form of the grievance mechanisms does not matter.  Formal‚ in the context of this indicator means grievances can be made via a webpage, phoneline, online portal, or by mail or email, or a combination.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Worker_Grievance_Mechanism_Accessibility+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24133924,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+External Stakeholder Grievance Mechanism Accessibility",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+External_Stakeholder_Grievance_Mechanism_Accessibility.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "External Stakeholder Grievance Mechanism Accessibility",
      "question": "Does the company indicate that it has one or more mechanism(s), or participates in a shared mechanism, accessible to all external individuals and communities who may be adversely impacted by the company, or those acting on their behalf, to raise complaints or concerns without fear of reprisals?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality has a grievance mechanism which considers and<br>\naddresses the additional barriers women face to access and/or use these mechanisms (e.g. allowing<br>\nfor anonymity) and requires the same from its suppliers. It recognises that women employees may<br>\nface additional barriers to accessing and using the mechanism and obtaining an<br>\neffective remedy.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe company indicates it has one or more formal grievance mechanisms available to raise complaints or concerns related to the company. It should include the following:<br>\n1\\.Be available to **external individuals and communities**. It must be clear it is open to all stakeholders, not only specific groups e.g. suppliers.<br>\n It is sufficient for the company to state that its grievance channel/mechanism(s) are open to  anyone  or the public.<br>\n2\\.The channel must ensure **both anonymous and non-anonymous **reporting.<br>\n Disclosure of an  option  to report anonymously is accepted <br>\n If an email is provided, it is assumed to provide non-anonymous reporting.<br>\n All reports are considered regardless of whether they are anonymous or non-anonymous.<br>\n It is accepted if anonymous reporting is conditional on local laws, but not if it is available in only some locations that is not due to local laws.<br>\n3\\.The complainant should **be able to report on all aspects of human rights**, not only specific rights (e.g. discrimination).<br>\n An explicit reference to human rights is not required, but it must be clear to stakeholders that a channel/mechanism designed to cover other topics (e.g. a corruption hotline) can be used to raise human rights complaints or concerns as well. <br>\n It is sufficient if reports can be made on violations of a code of conduct which includes human rights. <br>\n4\\.The company should ensure **non-retaliation** for raising complaints. <br>\n5\\.The mechanism is to be available in **all appropriate languages**: e.g. if the channel is only available in one language, the company should indicate the reason behind that choice.<br>\n<br>\nThe form of the grievance mechanisms does not matter.  Formal‚ in the context of this indicator means grievances can be made via a webpage, phoneline, online portal, or by mail or email, or a combination.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+External_Stakeholder_Grievance_Mechanism_Accessibility+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24133940,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sex-Disaggregated Grievance Data Collection",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Grievance_Data_Collection.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sex-Disaggregated Grievance Data Collection",
      "question": "Does the company collect, analyse, and monitor sex-disaggregated grievance data (e.g., number of grievances reported, number of grievances remediated)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality has a grievance mechanism which considers and<br>\naddresses the additional barriers women face to access and/or use these mechanisms (e.g. allowing<br>\nfor anonymity) and requires the same from its suppliers. It recognises that women employees may<br>\nface additional barriers to accessing and using the mechanism and obtaining an<br>\neffective remedy.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe company collects, analyses and monitors sex-disaggregated grievance data (e.g., number of grievances reported, number of grievances remediated).<br>\n<br>\nThe evidence must include sex-disaggregated data of grievances. It can be expressed in numbers or percentages, it can refer to any number of years (even just the last year), and it can refer to filed grievances and/or remediated grievances.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Grievance_Data_Collection+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24133956,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supply Chain Worker Grievance Mechanism Access",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Worker_Grievance_Mechanism_Access.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supply Chain Worker Grievance Mechanism Access",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it ensures workers in its supply chain have access to either: the company's own mechanism(s) to raise complaints or concerns related to the company's suppliers, or does the company expect its business relationships to establish a mechanism(s) for their workers to raise such complaints or concerns?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality has a grievance mechanism which considers and<br>\naddresses the additional barriers women face to access and/or use these mechanisms (e.g. allowing<br>\nfor anonymity) and requires the same from its suppliers. It recognises that women employees may<br>\nface additional barriers to accessing and using the mechanism and obtaining an<br>\neffective remedy.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThis element focuses on the presence of a grievance committee for workers in the supply chain. The company can either set up a mechanism that suppliers  workers can use to raise complaints or require suppliers to do so. If the company's statement indicates that their channel is open for suppliers or general audience (or anyone), the point can be awarded.<br>\n<br>\nA shared mechanism is a third party complain system that workers in the supply chain can use to file grievances. It is set up by an external party and made available to supply chain workers through their employer - in this case, the company's suppliers. Differently from the company's own mechanism, the shared grievance mechanism is not managed directly by the company but rather by an external party mandated by the company.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Worker_Grievance_Mechanism_Access+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24133972,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Employee Gender Equality Engagement Mechanisms",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Employee_Gender_Equality_Engagement_Mechanisms.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Employee Gender Equality Engagement Mechanisms",
      "question": "Does the company have employee surveys or other engagement mechanisms that specifically address gender equality and women's empowerment issues?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality collects feedback on gender issues and uses this<br>\nfeedback to evaluate its actions and inform its gender policies, practices and strategy. A company that<br>\nengages with its women employees and gender diverse external stakeholders (including women’s<br>\norganisations and/or other gender experts) on its gender impacts shows its commitment to<br>\nunderstanding and addressing any potential adverse gender impacts that result from the business<br>\nactivities within its value chain. Furthermore, suppliers should try to understand their women workers’<br>\nneeds by conducting factory surveys that cover gender issues. In turn, the company can use this<br>\nfeedback to inform its gender equality and women’s empowerment efforts and evaluate performance.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The company seeks feedback from its employees to inform its gender equality and women's empowerment efforts.<br>\n<br>\n2\\.Evidence must be found of employee surveys (or other feedback mechanisms e.g. engagement survey, pulse survey) with specific mention to gender issues. This does not mean that the whole engagement exercise must only relate to gender issues, though there must be at least 1 question that is gender specific. <br>\n<br>\nIt should be clear the employee feedback is either reported to management or that the results of employee surveys are actively used by the management. If a working group on feedback consists of employees where feedback is discussed but not reported to management this is not sufficient.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Employee_Gender_Equality_Engagement_Mechanisms+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24133998,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+External Stakeholder Engagement on Gender Equality",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+External_Stakeholder_Engagement_on_Gender_Equality.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "External Stakeholder Engagement on Gender Equality",
      "question": "Does the company engage with external stakeholders to inform its gender equality and women's empowerment efforts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality collects feedback on gender issues and uses this<br>\nfeedback to evaluate its actions and inform its gender policies, practices and strategy. A company that<br>\nengages with its women employees and gender diverse external stakeholders (including women’s<br>\norganisations and/or other gender experts) on its gender impacts shows its commitment to<br>\nunderstanding and addressing any potential adverse gender impacts that result from the business<br>\nactivities within its value chain. Furthermore, suppliers should try to understand their women workers’<br>\nneeds by conducting factory surveys that cover gender issues. In turn, the company can use this<br>\nfeedback to inform its gender equality and women’s empowerment efforts and evaluate performance.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.At least one of the stakeholder(s) the company has listed must have a clear focus on gender equity/women's empowerment or it must specify exactly what gender-related issue the company engaged with them on.<br>\n<br>\nThere must be evidence/statement that the company has collected feedback from this engagement that is specifically related to gender issues.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+External_Stakeholder_Engagement_on_Gender_Equality+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134024,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supply Chain Worker Gender Feedback Programmes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Worker_Gender_Feedback_Programmes.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supply Chain Worker Gender Feedback Programmes",
      "question": "Does the company have one or more programmes in place for obtaining feedback from its supply chain workers on gender-related issues?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality collects feedback on gender issues and uses this<br>\nfeedback to evaluate its actions and inform its gender policies, practices and strategy. A company that<br>\nengages with its women employees and gender diverse external stakeholders (including women’s<br>\norganisations and/or other gender experts) on its gender impacts shows its commitment to<br>\nunderstanding and addressing any potential adverse gender impacts that result from the business<br>\nactivities within its value chain. Furthermore, suppliers should try to understand their women workers’<br>\nneeds by conducting factory surveys that cover gender issues. In turn, the company can use this<br>\nfeedback to inform its gender equality and women’s empowerment efforts and evaluate performance.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The gender needs assessment does not need to be called a  gender needs assessment . In most instances it will not be called that, but something else like  In-factory survey ,  factory worker survey , \"worker voice survey\" etc. While it could include other issues, gender issues must be included in the survey (e.g. on sexual harassment within a factory).<br>\n<br>\n2\\.The company either needs to require its suppliers to undertake a gender needs assessment (e.g. in contractual arrangements or in a supplier code of conduct) or the company must have a specific programme in place for obtaining the feedback of workers in the supply chain or for suppliers to obtain feedback from their workers (this must include gender issues, but results do not necessarily need to be shared with the company).<br>\n<br>\n3\\.It is not necessary that the company requires all its suppliers to undertake this exercise. Evidence related to specific suppliers will be accepted.<br>\n<br>\n4\\.Examples of issues captured in the assessment:<br>\na.Representation (e.g. economic empowerment, professional development) <br>\nb.Health and well-being (e.g. contraception, mental health)<br>\nc.Violence and harassment<br>\nOther",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Worker_Gender_Feedback_Programmes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134040,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Integration of Gender Stakeholder Feedback into Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Integration_of_Gender_Stakeholder_Feedback_into_Policy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Integration of Gender Stakeholder Feedback into Policy",
      "question": "Has the company integrated stakeholder feedback regarding gender issues into its company policies and/or practices?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality collects feedback on gender issues and uses this<br>\nfeedback to evaluate its actions and inform its gender policies, practices and strategy. A company that<br>\nengages with its women employees and gender diverse external stakeholders (including women’s<br>\norganisations and/or other gender experts) on its gender impacts shows its commitment to<br>\nunderstanding and addressing any potential adverse gender impacts that result from the business<br>\nactivities within its value chain. Furthermore, suppliers should try to understand their women workers’<br>\nneeds by conducting factory surveys that cover gender issues. In turn, the company can use this<br>\nfeedback to inform its gender equality and women’s empowerment efforts and evaluate performance.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The company should have at least 1 example of how feedback from its engagement captured has resulted in a change to a policy or practice.<br>\n<br>\nCompanies can ONLY meet ED, if they have met EA, EB, and/or EC for this indicator (i.e. if there's evidence of any of the engagement efforts resulting in changes in company policies/practices).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Integration_of_Gender_Stakeholder_Feedback_into_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134056,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Gender Audit Screening",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Gender_Audit_Screening.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Gender Audit Screening",
      "question": "Does the company screen for gender-related issues among its suppliers as part of its audit process?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality screens for gender-related issues (e.g. sexual<br>\nharassment, gender-based violence, gender discrimination) among suppliers as part of its supplier<br>\naudit process as well as identifies and addresses the ones in need of corrective action with<br>\nconsequences for adverse actions to discourage adverse gender impacts among its suppliers.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The company screens for at least three gender-related issues among its suppliers, as part of its audit process.<br>\n<br>\n2\\.Example of gender-related issues:<br>\na.Sexual harassment <br>\nb.Gender-based violence (other than sexual harassment) <br>\nc.Discrimination against pregnant or married women <br>\nd.Discrimination against divorced or widowed women <br>\ne.Intimidation, harassment, retaliation or violence against trade union members/representatives <br>\nf.Informal workers <br>\ng.Lack of access to quality health information and services <br>\nh.Lack of gender-segregated washrooms and toilet facilities <br>\ni.Absence of policy covering gender discrimination <br>\nj.Absence of policy on sexual harassment <br>\nk.Lack of communication of non-discrimination policy <br>\nl.Other (e.g. discrimination based on gender, adequate health and safety provision and procedures for pregnant, postpartum or lactating workers, no mandatory pregnancy or HIV tests, prohibited opposite sex frisking) <br>\n<br>\n3\\.The evidence must show that the company is really committing to carrying out audits. Therefore, if the company only discloses that it reserves the right to do so, the disclosure will not be accepted. It must be clear that the company commits to conduct audits on at least three or at least four of the issues listed above.<br>\n<br>\n4\\.This information will usually be found in the supplier audit/remediation program/policy. Since few companies publicly disclose which issues are looked at during audits, if the issues are clearly outlined in the supplier code of conduct and the company states that they audit against all code requirements, the evidence can be accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Gender_Audit_Screening+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134072,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Gender-Related Corrective Action",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Gender_Related_Corrective_Action.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Gender-Related Corrective Action",
      "question": "Has the company identified any gender-related issues as requiring corrective action to be taken by a supplier within a set period of time in order to remediate the issue?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality screens for gender-related issues (e.g. sexual<br>\nharassment, gender-based violence, gender discrimination) among suppliers as part of its supplier<br>\naudit process as well as identifies and addresses the ones in need of corrective action with<br>\nconsequences for adverse actions to discourage adverse gender impacts among its suppliers.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The company identified any gender-related issues as requiring corrective action to be taken by a supplier within a set period of time to remediate the issue.<br>\n<br>\nThe evidence must show that the company discloses the remediation timeframe associated gender-related issues. However, since few companies categorize issues based on whether they are gender-related, if it is clearly disclosed that all non-compliances with the supplier code of conduct require remediation within a certain timeframe and details of this process is described then the evidence can be accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Gender_Related_Corrective_Action+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134093,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Gender Balance at Highest Governance Body",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Balance_at_Highest_Governance_Body.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Gender Balance at Highest Governance Body",
      "question": "Does the company maintain a gender balance (between 40-60%) at the highest governance body?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality has women actively participating in leadership<br>\npositions at all levels in the organisation (e.g. board, senior executive, senior management,<br>\nmiddle/other management). It recognises that increased participation of women across the different<br>\nlevels of a company leads to improved company governance, business performance, innovation, and<br>\nrecruitment and retention of women.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The company discloses that it maintains a gender balance (between 40-60%) on its highest governing body.<br>\n2\\.The company can provide evidence from any type of public document or webpage belonging to the company.<br>\n3\\.\t\t\tDiagrams and pictures that display the proportion of women and/or men are accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Balance_at_Highest_Governance_Body+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134109,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Gender Balance at Senior Executive Level",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Balance_at_Senior_Executive_Level.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Gender Balance at Senior Executive Level",
      "question": "Does the company maintain a gender balance (between 40-60%) at the senior executive level?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality has women actively participating in leadership<br>\npositions at all levels in the organisation (e.g. board, senior executive, senior management,<br>\nmiddle/other management). It recognises that increased participation of women across the different<br>\nlevels of a company leads to improved company governance, business performance, innovation, and<br>\nrecruitment and retention of women.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.Senior executives are the C-suite (CEO, COO, CFO, CSO, CLO, CTO, etc.).<br>\n<br>\n2\\.Some companies may also use the following terms to refer to senior executives:<br>\na.Executive committee<br>\nb.Executive officers<br>\nc.Women executives <br>\nThis list is purely indicative and not exhaustive.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Balance_at_Senior_Executive_Level+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134125,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Gender Balance at Senior Management Level",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Balance_at_Senior_Management_Level.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Gender Balance at Senior Management Level",
      "question": "Does the company maintain a gender balance (between 40-60%) at the senior management level?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality has women actively participating in leadership<br>\npositions at all levels in the organisation (e.g. board, senior executive, senior management,<br>\nmiddle/other management). It recognises that increased participation of women across the different<br>\nlevels of a company leads to improved company governance, business performance, innovation, and<br>\nrecruitment and retention of women.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nSenior management could include general managers, VP etc. <br>\n<br>\nSome companies also use the term  People leader  to refer to senior management. In such a case it should be clear that this is a senior position, or the company should disclose accompanying figure for middle/other management.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Balance_at_Senior_Management_Level+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134141,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Gender Balance at Middle Management Level",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Balance_at_Middle_Management_Level.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Gender Balance at Middle Management Level",
      "question": "Does the company maintain a gender balance (between 40-60%) at the middle/other management level?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality has women actively participating in leadership<br>\npositions at all levels in the organisation (e.g. board, senior executive, senior management,<br>\nmiddle/other management). It recognises that increased participation of women across the different<br>\nlevels of a company leads to improved company governance, business performance, innovation, and<br>\nrecruitment and retention of women.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.Some companies may use the following terms to refer to middle management/other management:<br>\na.Women in management <br>\nb.Women as a percentage of leadership<br>\nc.Women professional<br>\nd.Supervisors<br>\ne.Officers<br>\nThis data should be disclosed at the entire workforce level.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Balance_at_Middle_Management_Level+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134157,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Gender Balance Across All Employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Balance_Across_All_Employees.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Gender Balance Across All Employees",
      "question": "Does the company maintain a gender balance (between 40-60%) across all employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality has women actively participating in leadership<br>\npositions at all levels in the organisation (e.g. board, senior executive, senior management,<br>\nmiddle/other management). It recognises that increased participation of women across the different<br>\nlevels of a company leads to improved company governance, business performance, innovation, and<br>\nrecruitment and retention of women.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n40   60% gender balance in the entire workforce of the company if available.<br>\n<br>\nThis element serves as a data collection point and does not affect <br>\nthe company's assessment. Therefore, it is scored as  Non-Applicable",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Balance_Across_All_Employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134173,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Women's Professional Development Programmes",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Women_s_Professional_Development_Programmes.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Women's Professional Development Programmes",
      "question": "Does the company offer professional development programmes to its women employees (e.g., mentoring programme(s), leadership coaching, access to internal and/or external professional networks, educational programs, formal sponsorship programmes)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality monitors and grows its pipeline of women<br>\nleaders by offering them professional development opportunities (including those with specific<br>\nsupport for women) so they feel empowered to grow in their roles. Furthermore, it recognises that<br>\nwomen have traditionally been discriminated against and focuses on removing bias from its<br>\nrecruitment process, for example by provide training (e.g. unconscious bias training) to its hiring<br>\nmanagers. This company can confer productivity benefits to wider society and the economy through<br>\ncontributing to closing the gender gap in labour force participation.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.Programs must be specifically designed for women employees. General internal training or programmes covering all employees do not count. Men employees can participate, but women employees should be in the majority/target group. <br>\n<br>\n2\\.For this indicator, evidence is accepted of implementation in specific location/subsidiary. Evidence focused on certain levels or job positions is also valid, as long as the program is well-structured and explicitly designed to support women employees.<br>\n<br>\n3\\.Must be a robust programme. for instance, it is important to not simply look at networks or count how many programmes they have but make sure the programmes are substantial and provide women with skills, opportunities, etc.<br>\n<br>\n4\\.Professional development programmes may look like:<br>\na.Mentoring programmes <br>\nb.Leadership coaching <br>\nc.Access to professional networks (internal and/or external)<br>\nd.Educational programmes<br>\ne.Formal sponsorship programmes<br>\nOther",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Women_s_Professional_Development_Programmes+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134189,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Women's Professional Development Programme Participation Tracking",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Women_s_Professional_Development_Programme_Participation_Tracking.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Women's Professional Development Programme Participation Tracking",
      "question": "Does the company track the number of women who are participating in these programmes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality monitors and grows its pipeline of women<br>\nleaders by offering them professional development opportunities (including those with specific<br>\nsupport for women) so they feel empowered to grow in their roles. Furthermore, it recognises that<br>\nwomen have traditionally been discriminated against and focuses on removing bias from its<br>\nrecruitment process, for example by provide training (e.g. unconscious bias training) to its hiring<br>\nmanagers. This company can confer productivity benefits to wider society and the economy through<br>\ncontributing to closing the gender gap in labour force participation.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n  The company tracks the number of women participating in programmes specifically targeted towards them mentioned in GEB B02.A.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Women_s_Professional_Development_Programme_Participation_Tracking+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134205,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Bias Removal in Hiring Process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Bias_Removal_in_Hiring_Process.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Bias Removal in Hiring Process",
      "question": "Has the company taken specific actions to actively remove bias from its hiring process?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality monitors and grows its pipeline of women<br>\nleaders by offering them professional development opportunities (including those with specific<br>\nsupport for women) so they feel empowered to grow in their roles. Furthermore, it recognises that<br>\nwomen have traditionally been discriminated against and focuses on removing bias from its<br>\nrecruitment process, for example by provide training (e.g. unconscious bias training) to its hiring<br>\nmanagers. This company can confer productivity benefits to wider society and the economy through<br>\ncontributing to closing the gender gap in labour force participation.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n  This needs to be a hiring action, for example ensuring that the company hires at least 50% women. Therefore, general company-wide bias trainings would not count unless they re specifically held for the hiring managers.<br>\nStating that the company has a growing percentage of women in the company is not enough. A specific plan of actions action should be demonstrated.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Bias_Removal_in_Hiring_Process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134221,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sex-Disaggregated Data on Workforce by Occupational Function",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Data_on_Workforce_by_Occupational_Function.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sex-Disaggregated Data on Workforce by Occupational Function",
      "question": "Does the company collect sex-disaggregated data on the gender balance of its employees by occupational function?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality has women employees actively participating in<br>\nall occupational functions as much as their men counterparts. It acknowledges that women are<br>\noverrepresented in certain functions (e.g. HR, Admin) and underrepresented in others (e.g. Finance,<br>\nfunctions with profit and loss responsibility). Therefore, it systematically collects, monitors and<br>\nanalyses sex-disaggregated data about the gender balance of its occupations, along with sex-<br>\ndisaggregated data on employee promotion, turnover and absenteeism rates. It uses this data to<br>\nidentify any gender-related issues and to inform the effectiveness of its gender strategy.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.Company discloses sex-disaggregated data on at least 3 occupational functions. Could be found in disclosure on the workforce by job classification or occupation. <br>\n<br>\n2\\.This element is not looking for \"gender balance\" (i.e. 40-60% women), but rather if the company discloses sex-disaggregated data for occupational functions.<br>\n<br>\n3\\.The data does not need to be categorized to cover the entire workforce. We accept data on occupational functions that covers at least 90% of the total workforce.<br>\nIf the occupational function categories used do not cover the entire workforce, the total workforce figure must be disclosed with the data as well. <br>\n<br>\nCompanies that are based in USA are required to publish an Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Report. Such a report has sex-disaggregated data for occupational functions being reported by the company. This evidence can only be accepted if the company has operations solely in USA. If it has operations beyond USA, it needs to disclose this data for all its locations.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Data_on_Workforce_by_Occupational_Function+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134237,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sex-Disaggregated Data on Employee Promotions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Data_on_Employee_Promotions.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sex-Disaggregated Data on Employee Promotions",
      "question": "Does the company collect sex-disaggregated data on the percentage of employees promoted?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality has women employees actively participating in<br>\nall occupational functions as much as their men counterparts. It acknowledges that women are<br>\noverrepresented in certain functions (e.g. HR, Admin) and underrepresented in others (e.g. Finance,<br>\nfunctions with profit and loss responsibility). Therefore, it systematically collects, monitors and<br>\nanalyses sex-disaggregated data about the gender balance of its occupations, along with sex-<br>\ndisaggregated data on employee promotion, turnover and absenteeism rates. It uses this data to<br>\nidentify any gender-related issues and to inform the effectiveness of its gender strategy.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The company collects sex-disaggregated data on the percentage of employees promoted.<br>\n<br>\n2\\.Disclosure of the number of women vs. men who have been promoted in the company's workforce—without the calculation or publication of a formal promotion rate—can be accepted as valid evidence. <br>\nDisclosure that shows % of female against total workforce is also accepted",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Data_on_Employee_Promotions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134253,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sex-Disaggregated Data on Employee Turnover",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Data_on_Employee_Turnover.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sex-Disaggregated Data on Employee Turnover",
      "question": "Does the company collect sex-disaggregated data on the annual turnover of employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality has women employees actively participating in<br>\nall occupational functions as much as their men counterparts. It acknowledges that women are<br>\noverrepresented in certain functions (e.g. HR, Admin) and underrepresented in others (e.g. Finance,<br>\nfunctions with profit and loss responsibility). Therefore, it systematically collects, monitors and<br>\nanalyses sex-disaggregated data about the gender balance of its occupations, along with sex-<br>\ndisaggregated data on employee promotion, turnover and absenteeism rates. It uses this data to<br>\nidentify any gender-related issues and to inform the effectiveness of its gender strategy.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n  1\\.Turnover refers to how many employees left the company, either voluntarily or involuntarily. The company doesn t need to specify/break down the total of which was voluntary or involuntary, a total figure is accepted. <br>\n<br>\n2\\.This figure does not have to be global, but it should cover the company's main operating country/region to show that it understands whether women are leaving the company at a faster rate than men.<br>\n<br>\n3\\.Disclosure of the number of women vs. men who have exited the company's workforce—without the formal turnover rate—can be accepted as valid evidence. <br>\na.Disclosure that shows % of female against total workforce is also accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Data_on_Employee_Turnover+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134269,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sex-Disaggregated Data on Employee Absenteeism",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Data_on_Employee_Absenteeism.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sex-Disaggregated Data on Employee Absenteeism",
      "question": "Does the company collect sex-disaggregated data on the annual absenteeism levels of employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality has women employees actively participating in<br>\nall occupational functions as much as their men counterparts. It acknowledges that women are<br>\noverrepresented in certain functions (e.g. HR, Admin) and underrepresented in others (e.g. Finance,<br>\nfunctions with profit and loss responsibility). Therefore, it systematically collects, monitors and<br>\nanalyses sex-disaggregated data about the gender balance of its occupations, along with sex-<br>\ndisaggregated data on employee promotion, turnover and absenteeism rates. It uses this data to<br>\nidentify any gender-related issues and to inform the effectiveness of its gender strategy.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The company collects sex-disaggregated data on the annual absenteeism levels of employees.<br>\nWe can also accept evidence that shows % of female against total, as we can calculate the male % from it.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Data_on_Employee_Absenteeism+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134290,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sex-Disaggregated Supply Chain Leadership Data Collection",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Supply_Chain_Leadership_Data_Collection.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sex-Disaggregated Supply Chain Leadership Data Collection",
      "question": "Does the company collect or require its suppliers to collect sex-disaggregated data by leadership level across the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality collects or requires its suppliers to collect sex-<br>\ndisaggregated data by leadership level (e.g. supervisors/line managers, workers). It also supports its<br>\nsuppliers in offering professional development opportunities to women workers in the supply chain.<br>\nWomen can serve as supervisors or managers and occupy similar leadership roles in the supply chain<br>\nas effectively as men, but currently they are not extended equal opportunities to lead.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nLooking for disclosure on a breakdown of at least two levels (i.e. worker and supervisor) within the supplier, not only a total supplier workforce breakdown.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Supply_Chain_Leadership_Data_Collection+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134311,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Women's Professional Development Support in Supply Chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Women_s_Professional_Development_Support_in_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Women's Professional Development Support in Supply Chain",
      "question": "Does the company support its suppliers in offering professional development opportunities to women workers in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality collects or requires its suppliers to collect sex-<br>\ndisaggregated data by leadership level (e.g. supervisors/line managers, workers). It also supports its<br>\nsuppliers in offering professional development opportunities to women workers in the supply chain.<br>\nWomen can serve as supervisors or managers and occupy similar leadership roles in the supply chain<br>\nas effectively as men, but currently they are not extended equal opportunities to lead.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe programme need not be a group/parent-level initiative, though the evidence should be found in group/parent's reporting to show the parent company is aware and supports these kinds of initiatives. <br>\n<br>\nAn example of one initiative within one factory is sufficient.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Women_s_Professional_Development_Support_in_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134327,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supply Chain Women's Programme Participation Tracking",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Women_s_Programme_Participation_Tracking.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supply Chain Women's Programme Participation Tracking",
      "question": "Does the company track the number of women who are participating in these programmes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality collects or requires its suppliers to collect sex-<br>\ndisaggregated data by leadership level (e.g. supervisors/line managers, workers). It also supports its<br>\nsuppliers in offering professional development opportunities to women workers in the supply chain.<br>\nWomen can serve as supervisors or managers and occupy similar leadership roles in the supply chain<br>\nas effectively as men, but currently they are not extended equal opportunities to lead.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n  The company tracks or requires its suppliers to track the number of women participating in programmes specifically targeted towards them. The programme must be the one mentioned in B.04.B",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Women_s_Programme_Participation_Tracking+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134343,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Non-Discrimination Policy for Pregnant and Married Women",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Non_Discrimination_Policy_for_Pregnant_and_Married_Women.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Non-Discrimination Policy for Pregnant and Married Women",
      "question": "Does the company require its suppliers to have an equal opportunity or non-discrimination policy that explicitly protects pregnant and married women workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality requires its suppliers to have a non-<br>\ndiscriminatory policy that explicitly protects pregnant and/or married women workers and to train<br>\nsupervisors and hiring managers accordingly. It supports its suppliers in preventing the discrimination<br>\nof pregnant/married women workers in the supply chain to help discourage any further negative<br>\ngender impacts.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nFor the element to be met, the company should require its suppliers to have an equal opportunity or non-discrimination policy that explicitly protects both groups: pregnant and married women workers.<br>\n<br>\nNon-discrimination clauses regarding workers employment status for example from hiring, dismissal, demotion are also acceptable as evidence.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Non_Discrimination_Policy_for_Pregnant_and_Married_Women+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134359,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Support to Prevent Discrimination Against Pregnant and Married Women",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Support_to_Prevent_Discrimination_Against_Pregnant_and_Married_Women.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Support to Prevent Discrimination Against Pregnant and Married Women",
      "question": "Does the company provide support to its suppliers to prevent discrimination against pregnant and/or married women workers in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality requires its suppliers to have a non-<br>\ndiscriminatory policy that explicitly protects pregnant and/or married women workers and to train<br>\nsupervisors and hiring managers accordingly. It supports its suppliers in preventing the discrimination<br>\nof pregnant/married women workers in the supply chain to help discourage any further negative<br>\ngender impacts.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nAny training for hiring managers addressing bias is counted as evidence. <br>\n<br>\nA social audit alone cannot be regarded as support",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Support_to_Prevent_Discrimination_Against_Pregnant_and_Married_Women+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134380,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supply Chain Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining Requirement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Freedom_of_Association_and_Collective_Bargaining_Requirement.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supply Chain Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining Requirement",
      "question": "In its contractual arrangements or code of conduct, does the company require business relationships to respect the right of all workers to form and join a trade union of their choice (or equivalent worker bodies where the rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining are restricted under law) and to bargain collectively and also prohibit intimidation, harassment, retaliation and violence against trade union members and trade union representatives?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality requires its suppliers to recognise agreements<br>\nwith trade unions, welcome collective bargaining agreements, prohibit intimidation, retaliation and<br>\nviolence against trade union members (particularly women), and support and educate workers on<br>\ntheir rights.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nContractual arrangements:<br>\nTo meet this element, the company must disclose evidence that it has formal, binding contractual arrangements with suppliers that contains such requirements, such as a Supplier Code of Conduct or an equivalent contract.<br>\n<br>\nThe right to freedom of association and collective bargaining:<br>\n<br>\nThe company mentions specifically that it requires respect for the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining, and suppliers are prohibited from intimidating, harassing, or retaliating against workers for exercising these rights.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Freedom_of_Association_and_Collective_Bargaining_Requirement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134396,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supply Chain Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining Support",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Freedom_of_Association_and_Collective_Bargaining_Support.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supply Chain Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining Support",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it works to support the practices of its business relationships in relation to freedom of association and collective bargaining?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality requires its suppliers to recognise agreements<br>\nwith trade unions, welcome collective bargaining agreements, prohibit intimidation, retaliation and<br>\nviolence against trade union members (particularly women), and support and educate workers on<br>\ntheir rights.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses how it supports suppliers to facilitate freedom of association and collective bargaining by, for example:<br>\na. Providing training to suppliers or;<br>\nb. Conducting joint projects to support suppliers or;<br>\nc. Supporting unionisation, workers  groups or worker empowerment or;<br>\nd. Going beyond observing or monitoring its business relationships in relation to freedom of association and collective bargaining.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Freedom_of_Association_and_Collective_Bargaining_Support+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134412,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Gender-Responsive Procurement Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Responsive_Procurement_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Gender-Responsive Procurement Commitment",
      "question": "Has the company made a public commitment to gender-responsive procurement?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality acknowledges that women entrepreneurs face<br>\ndisproportionate barriers to market access globally. It actively procures from women-owned<br>\nbusinesses and has taken specific actions to increase its procurement spend on them to provide<br>\ngreater market access to and economic inclusion of women entrepreneurs who disproportionately<br>\nlack this access due to social norms that limit their access to information and networking<br>\nopportunities. This can confer benefits on the company, including a more diversified supplier base<br>\nand increased market competition among suppliers.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe company has made a public commitment to gender-responsive procurement. This does not need to be a high-level policy commitment and therefore it is accepted if this public commitment is found in a webpage or in a company report.<br>\n<br>\nFor this indicator, we accept evidence of implementation in specific location/subsidiary.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Responsive_Procurement_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134428,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Procurement from Women-Owned Businesses",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Procurement_from_Women_Owned_Businesses.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Procurement from Women-Owned Businesses",
      "question": "Does the company procure from women-owned businesses?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality acknowledges that women entrepreneurs face<br>\ndisproportionate barriers to market access globally. It actively procures from women-owned<br>\nbusinesses and has taken specific actions to increase its procurement spend on them to provide<br>\ngreater market access to and economic inclusion of women entrepreneurs who disproportionately<br>\nlack this access due to social norms that limit their access to information and networking<br>\nopportunities. This can confer benefits on the company, including a more diversified supplier base<br>\nand increased market competition among suppliers.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe company should show evidence they are procuring from Women Owned Businesses (WOB). A women-owned businesses is at least 51% owned and controlled by women.<br>\nWhile good practice, disclosure on total amount spent on diverse suppliers without specifying the amount spent specifically on women-owned business is not accepted here.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Procurement_from_Women_Owned_Businesses+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134444,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Gender Pay Gap Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Pay_Gap_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Gender Pay Gap Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the ratio of the basic salary and remuneration of women to men in its total direct operations workforce for each employee category, by all locations of operation?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality and actively seeks to address pay inequalities<br>\nacross its own operations. It measures and publishes its gender pay gap, even if this is not mandated<br>\nby law, and takes concrete steps to address its root causes. It is expected to collect sex-disaggregated<br>\npay data by different pay bands and occupational functions and include other financial benefits in its<br>\nanalysis at least annually. It can also use a third-party to undertake or verify its gender pay gap<br>\nanalysis.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The company discloses the ratio of the basic salary and remuneration of women to men in its total direct operations workforce for each employee category, by all locations of operation.<br>\n2\\.The company can refer to 'employees' or 'workers' instead of 'total direct operations workforce'.<br>\n3\\.'Employee category' refers to seniority or function:<br>\na.'Function' can be defined in the company's own terms e.g. technician, production, administrative. <br>\nb.'Seniority' can be defined in the company's own terms e.g. junior, senior management, middle management.<br>\n4\\.\t\t'Locations of operation' must include all countries of operation.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Pay_Gap_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134460,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sex-Disaggregated Pay Data Collection",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Pay_Data_Collection.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sex-Disaggregated Pay Data Collection",
      "question": "Does the company collect sex-disaggregated pay data by different pay bands, occupational functions or other financial benefits?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality and actively seeks to address pay inequalities<br>\nacross its own operations. It measures and publishes its gender pay gap, even if this is not mandated<br>\nby law, and takes concrete steps to address its root causes. It is expected to collect sex-disaggregated<br>\npay data by different pay bands and occupational functions and include other financial benefits in its<br>\nanalysis at least annually. It can also use a third-party to undertake or verify its gender pay gap<br>\nanalysis.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1. The company collects sex-disaggregated pay data by different pay bands, occupational functions or other financial benefits.<br>\n2\\.\tThe company either:<br>\na.\tCollects sex-disaggregated pay data for at least 3 pay bands or 3 occupational functions when analysing its gender pay gap, or;<br>\nb.\tincludes other financial benefits (e.g., insurance benefits, bonuses, retirement contributions) when analysing its gender pay gap.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Pay_Data_Collection+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134471,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Third-Party Gender Pay Gap Verification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Third_Party_Gender_Pay_Gap_Verification.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Third-Party Gender Pay Gap Verification",
      "question": "Does the company use a third-party to undertake / verify its gender pay gap analysis?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality and actively seeks to address pay inequalities<br>\nacross its own operations. It measures and publishes its gender pay gap, even if this is not mandated<br>\nby law, and takes concrete steps to address its root causes. It is expected to collect sex-disaggregated<br>\npay data by different pay bands and occupational functions and include other financial benefits in its<br>\nanalysis at least annually. It can also use a third-party to undertake or verify its gender pay gap<br>\nanalysis.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nFor this element, we accept evidence related to verification of equal pay for equal work. This verification can be determined through certifications the company might have obtained. This verification does not need to cover all operations but can be obtained for a specific country or region.<br>\n<br>\nAssurance of annual reports and sustainability reports by third parties is not counted. However, if the assurance specifically gives a detailed review of the gender pay gap, that will be accepted. <br>\n<br>\nTypes of certifications that are deemed best practice for this element: EDGE certification and EQUAL-SALARY certification.<br>\n<br>\nAcceptable if the company partners with a third-party organisation to conduct pay gap analysis or the company uses third-partymethodologyto conduct the analysis.<br>\n<br>\nIf company has obtained third-party assurance on its periodic report, it must explicitly specify that the assurance was obtained for the gender pay gap disclosure.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Third_Party_Gender_Pay_Gap_Verification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134482,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Primary Carer Leave Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Primary_Carer_Leave_Policy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Primary Carer Leave Policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a global policy of providing at least 14 weeks of paid primary carer leave offered to full-time employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality respects employees’ reproductive rights and<br>\ntheir right to family life as well as women employees’ maternal health needs to physically recover from<br>\nchildbirth. In accordance with the ILO convention, it offers paid (at least 2/3 of full salary) primary<br>\ncarer/ maternity leave of at least 14 weeks and at least 2 weeks of secondary carer/paternity leave<br>\neven in locations/countries where it is not mandated by law. Unpaid leave contributes to the gender<br>\npay gap and lower levels of women’s workforce participation and senior leadership representation. A<br>\ncompany that provides such paid leave can be rewarded with higher levels of staff recruitment and<br>\nretention as well as health benefits for staff and society as a whole.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.Must be a global/group-level policy. <br>\n<br>\n2\\.Must be at least 2/3 paid.<br>\n<br>\n3\\.Points are awarded even if there is a seniority clause (i.e. with the company for minimum one year), because we cannot be sure of the seniority clauses in all the companies' policies, so we don't want to penalise those companies who are sharing it publicly.<br>\n<br>\nPoints are awarded only if company discloses that the leave is \"at least\" or \"more than\" 14 weeks as this is the language of ILO convention. While the number of weeks disclosed by the company is captured by our research, points are not awarded if the disclosure reads \"up to\".",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Primary_Carer_Leave_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134498,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Primary Carer Leave Return-to-Work and Retention Monitoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Primary_Carer_Leave_Return_to_Work_and_Retention_Monitoring.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Primary Carer Leave Return-to-Work and Retention Monitoring",
      "question": "Does the company monitor the return-to-work rate of employees after primary carer leave and their retention a year after primary carer leave?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality respects employees’ reproductive rights and<br>\ntheir right to family life as well as women employees’ maternal health needs to physically recover from<br>\nchildbirth. In accordance with the ILO convention, it offers paid (at least 2/3 of full salary) primary<br>\ncarer/ maternity leave of at least 14 weeks and at least 2 weeks of secondary carer/paternity leave<br>\neven in locations/countries where it is not mandated by law. Unpaid leave contributes to the gender<br>\npay gap and lower levels of women’s workforce participation and senior leadership representation. A<br>\ncompany that provides such paid leave can be rewarded with higher levels of staff recruitment and<br>\nretention as well as health benefits for staff and society as a whole.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe company monitors the return-to-work rate of employees after primary carer leave and their retention a year after primary carer leave.<br>\n<br>\nThe data should cover its global workforce, number in a specific location is not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Primary_Carer_Leave_Return_to_Work_and_Retention_Monitoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134514,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Secondary Carer Leave Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Secondary_Carer_Leave_Policy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Secondary Carer Leave Policy",
      "question": "Does the company have a global policy of providing at least two weeks of paid secondary carer leave offered to full-time employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality respects employees’ reproductive rights and<br>\ntheir right to family life as well as women employees’ maternal health needs to physically recover from<br>\nchildbirth. In accordance with the ILO convention, it offers paid (at least 2/3 of full salary) primary<br>\ncarer/ maternity leave of at least 14 weeks and at least 2 weeks of secondary carer/paternity leave<br>\neven in locations/countries where it is not mandated by law. Unpaid leave contributes to the gender<br>\npay gap and lower levels of women’s workforce participation and senior leadership representation. A<br>\ncompany that provides such paid leave can be rewarded with higher levels of staff recruitment and<br>\nretention as well as health benefits for staff and society as a whole.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.Must be a global / group-level policy.<br>\n<br>\n2\\.Must be at least 2/3 paid.<br>\n<br>\n3\\.Points are awarded even if there is a seniority clause (i.e. with the company for minimum one year), because we cannot be sure of the seniority clauses in all the companies' policies, so we don't want to penalise those companies who are sharing it publicly.<br>\n<br>\nPoints are awarded only if company discloses that the leave is \"at least\" or \"more than\" 2 weeks as this is the language of ILO recommendation. While the number of weeks disclosed by the company is captured by our research, points are not awarded if the disclosure reads \"up to\".",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Secondary_Carer_Leave_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134530,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Secondary Carer Leave Uptake Tracking",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Secondary_Carer_Leave_Uptake_Tracking.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Secondary Carer Leave Uptake Tracking",
      "question": "Does the company track the number of employees who take secondary carer leave?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality respects employees’ reproductive rights and<br>\ntheir right to family life as well as women employees’ maternal health needs to physically recover from<br>\nchildbirth. In accordance with the ILO convention, it offers paid (at least 2/3 of full salary) primary<br>\ncarer/ maternity leave of at least 14 weeks and at least 2 weeks of secondary carer/paternity leave<br>\neven in locations/countries where it is not mandated by law. Unpaid leave contributes to the gender<br>\npay gap and lower levels of women’s workforce participation and senior leadership representation. A<br>\ncompany that provides such paid leave can be rewarded with higher levels of staff recruitment and<br>\nretention as well as health benefits for staff and society as a whole.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe company tracks the number of employees who take secondary carer leave. <br>\n<br>\nThe data should cover its global workforce, number in a specific location is not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Secondary_Carer_Leave_Uptake_Tracking+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134546,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Childcare Support for Employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Childcare_Support_for_Employees.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Childcare Support for Employees",
      "question": "Does the company offer childcare support to its employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality demonstrates its commitments to family life and<br>\nwork-life balance by supporting childcare and other care responsibilities (e.g. breastfeeding,<br>\ndependent care). It recognises that work-life balance leads to improved business performance in<br>\nterms of talent retention. Unpaid childcare and other care responsibilities can be particularly<br>\nchallenging for employees with families, and these responsibilities disproportionately fall on women<br>\nas a result of gender norms.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.\tChildcare/other support does not need to be offered globally but the company must specify the locations (HQ and/or branches) offer childcare benefits and to which employees.<br>\n<br>\n2\\.\tFor now, it is okay if there are no further details on childcare benefits, but ideally we should note if some companies offer more details like the location of the childcare centre, the amount of childcare subsidies, etc.<br>\n<br>\n3\\.\tChildcare support:<br>\na.\tOn-site childcare facilities (e.g., crèche)<br>\nb.\tChildcare subsidies for off-site care<br>\nc.\tReferrals for off-site childcare facilities<br>\nd.\tOther",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Childcare_Support_for_Employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134562,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Family Support for Employees",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Family_Support_for_Employees.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Family Support for Employees",
      "question": "Does the company offer other family support to its employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality demonstrates its commitments to family life and<br>\nwork-life balance by supporting childcare and other care responsibilities (e.g. breastfeeding,<br>\ndependent care). It recognises that work-life balance leads to improved business performance in<br>\nterms of talent retention. Unpaid childcare and other care responsibilities can be particularly<br>\nchallenging for employees with families, and these responsibilities disproportionately fall on women<br>\nas a result of gender norms.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.\tOther family care support does not need to be offered globally but must specify the locations (HQ and/or branches) offer other family support and to which employees.<br>\n2\\.\tOther family care support:<br>\na.\tPaid time off for breastfeeding and lactating<br>\nb.\tPaid time off to attend healthcare appointments with children/dependents<br>\nc.\tFlexible working options for parents or carers<br>\nd.\tElder care or special needs care<br>\ne. Back up childcare<br>\nf.\tOther (for example, education scholarships for children/dependents, insurance coverage for families, etc.)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Family_Support_for_Employees+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134578,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Flexible Working Hours Availability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Flexible_Working_Hours_Availability.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Flexible Working Hours Availability",
      "question": "Does the company offer flexible working hours to its employees (the ability to alter the start and end of the day)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality demonstrates its commitments to family life and<br>\nwork-life balance by providing flexible working options to all employees, both in terms of when and<br>\nwhere they work (e.g. workday start/end times; away from company site). It recognises that the<br>\navailability of flexible working options supports work-life balance, respects family and other<br>\nresponsibilities of employees and leads to increased talent retention.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nPaid time off (PTO) or offering shift options does not count as flexible work. <br>\n<br>\nFlexible work arrangement with no further details does not count here.<br>\n<br>\nFlexible work hours after parental leave also does not count here.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Flexible_Working_Hours_Availability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134594,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sex-Disaggregated Data on Flexible Working Hours Uptake",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Data_on_Flexible_Working_Hours_Uptake.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sex-Disaggregated Data on Flexible Working Hours Uptake",
      "question": "Does the company collect sex-disaggregated data on the number of employees who have flexible working hour arrangements?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality demonstrates its commitments to family life and<br>\nwork-life balance by providing flexible working options to all employees, both in terms of when and<br>\nwhere they work (e.g. workday start/end times; away from company site). It recognises that the<br>\navailability of flexible working options supports work-life balance, respects family and other<br>\nresponsibilities of employees and leads to increased talent retention.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n The company collects sex-disaggregated data on the number of employees who have flexible working hour arrangements",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Data_on_Flexible_Working_Hours_Uptake+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134605,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Flexible Work Location Availability",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Flexible_Work_Location_Availability.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Flexible Work Location Availability",
      "question": "Does the company offer flexible work locations to its employees (the ability to work from home/telecommuting)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality demonstrates its commitments to family life and<br>\nwork-life balance by providing flexible working options to all employees, both in terms of when and<br>\nwhere they work (e.g. workday start/end times; away from company site). It recognises that the<br>\navailability of flexible working options supports work-life balance, respects family and other<br>\nresponsibilities of employees and leads to increased talent retention.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n  The company offers flexible work locations to its employees (the ability to work from home/telecommuting).<br>\n  <br>\nFlexible work arrangement with no further details cannot be accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Flexible_Work_Location_Availability+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134616,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sex-Disaggregated Data on Flexible Work Location Uptake",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Data_on_Flexible_Work_Location_Uptake.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sex-Disaggregated Data on Flexible Work Location Uptake",
      "question": "Does the company collect sex-disaggregated data on the number of employees who have flexible work location arrangements?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality demonstrates its commitments to family life and<br>\nwork-life balance by providing flexible working options to all employees, both in terms of when and<br>\nwhere they work (e.g. workday start/end times; away from company site). It recognises that the<br>\navailability of flexible working options supports work-life balance, respects family and other<br>\nresponsibilities of employees and leads to increased talent retention.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n  The company collects sex-disaggregated data on the number of employees who have flexible work location arrangements.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Data_on_Flexible_Work_Location_Uptake+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134627,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Formal Employment Contracts Requirement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Formal_Employment_Contracts_Requirement.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Formal Employment Contracts Requirement",
      "question": "Does the company require that its suppliers employ workers through formal contracts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality acknowledges that women globally are the<br>\nvictims of informal work or through low-quality, indirect or ‘flexible’ contracts, if any, with low wages,<br>\nand no benefits or social protection which can lead to precarious working conditions and potentially<br>\nforced labour and human trafficking. It requires its suppliers to offer formal contracts and takes<br>\nspecific actions to ensure suppliers support formal rather than informal work.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe company must require suppliers to offer ALL workers (not only migrant workers) with contracts or agreements, not just comply with local labour law or requirements, because not all countries' laws require contracts.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Formal_Employment_Contracts_Requirement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134643,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Formal Work Support",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Formal_Work_Support.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Formal Work Support",
      "question": "Does the company take specific actions to help ensure its suppliers support formal rather than informal work?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality acknowledges that women globally are the<br>\nvictims of informal work or through low-quality, indirect or ‘flexible’ contracts, if any, with low wages,<br>\nand no benefits or social protection which can lead to precarious working conditions and potentially<br>\nforced labour and human trafficking. It requires its suppliers to offer formal contracts and takes<br>\nspecific actions to ensure suppliers support formal rather than informal work.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The company takes specific actions to help ensure its suppliers support formal rather than informal work. <br>\n2\\.Examples of specific actions include: <br>\na.The company requires that its suppliers subcontract to registered businesses<br>\nb.The company requires that its suppliers collect sex-disaggregated data by contract type (e.g. permanent, temporary, piece-rate, agency, sub-contracted)<br>\nc.The company recognises the existence of home-based workers<br>\nOther",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Formal_Work_Support+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134659,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supply Chain Living Wage Activities Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Living_Wage_Activities_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supply Chain Living Wage Activities Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose evidence of activities to further the payment of living wages by its business relationships?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality acknowledges that wages paid to workers in the<br>\nsupply chain are often insufficient to provide a decent living to cover the basic needs – food, water, clothing, transport, education, healthcare and other essentials – of the worker and his or her<br>\ndependents as well as provide them with some discretionary income. It requires its suppliers to pay<br>\ntheir workers a living wage and or living income, contributing to closing the gender pay gap in the<br>\nsupply chain and takes specific actions to help ensure its suppliers pay their workers a living wage.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The company should describe at least one activity to further the payment of living wages by its business relationships. <br>\n2\\.Examples of accepted activities include (this is a non-exhaustive list):<br>\n The company discloses how it determines a living wages for the regions in which its business partners operate.<br>\n The company collects data on wages paid by business relationships.<br>\n The company measures gaps between current wages provided by business relationships and living wages.<br>\n The company analyses and adapts its purchasing practices to enables business relationships to pay a living wage.<br>\n The company supports business relationships in developing effective and responsible wage management systems, which include wage transparency, skills-based wage systems, annual wage revisions and negotiations with workers representatives.<br>\n3\\.The activity should be more advanced than training business relationships on living wage or participating in initiatives on living wage with business relationships. <br>\n4\\.\t\t\tIt is not accepted if the company has a written requirement that its business relationships pay their workers a living wage or an expectation that its business relationships pay their workers a living wage and it provides a description of how it works with its business relationships to support the payment of a living wage.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Living_Wage_Activities_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134675,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supply Chain Living Wage Joint Action Plan",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Living_Wage_Joint_Action_Plan.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supply Chain Living Wage Joint Action Plan",
      "question": "Does the company have established a joint action plan(s) with business relationships to work towards achieving living wages with measurable and time-bound milestones?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality acknowledges that wages paid to workers in the<br>\nsupply chain are often insufficient to provide a decent living to cover the basic needs – food, water, clothing, transport, education, healthcare and other essentials – of the worker and his or her<br>\ndependents as well as provide them with some discretionary income. It requires its suppliers to pay<br>\ntheir workers a living wage and or living income, contributing to closing the gender pay gap in the<br>\nsupply chain and takes specific actions to help ensure its suppliers pay their workers a living wage.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nA joint action plan (JAP) is a well-defined scope with a focus on output, results and achieving a pre-defined objective. It may consist of several related objectives or strive towards a single objective. <br>\n <br>\nFocus of the JAP <br>\n1. directly target the payment of living wages / incomes (i.e. achieving the payment of living wages / incomes by X% of business relationships)  <br>\n2. target factors that enable the payment of living wages (i.e. implementing effective wage management systems, strengthening freedom of association) <br>\n <br>\nWith business relationships <br>\nA JAP is generally agreed on between the different parties (company and its business relationships). This may be with only a proportion of the company's business relationships.  <br>\n <br>\nMeasurable and time-bound milestones <br>\nThe JAP needs to have milestones that can be measures (i.e. quantitative) and time-bound (i.e. have a target date).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Living_Wage_Joint_Action_Plan+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134691,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supply Chain Living Wage Progress",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Living_Wage_Progress.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supply Chain Living Wage Progress",
      "question": "Does the company demonstrate progress towards achieving the payment of living wages by its business relationships?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality acknowledges that wages paid to workers in the<br>\nsupply chain are often insufficient to provide a decent living to cover the basic needs – food, water, clothing, transport, education, healthcare and other essentials – of the worker and his or her<br>\ndependents as well as provide them with some discretionary income. It requires its suppliers to pay<br>\ntheir workers a living wage and or living income, contributing to closing the gender pay gap in the<br>\nsupply chain and takes specific actions to help ensure its suppliers pay their workers a living wage.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThis element assesses whether companies provide quantitative data on living wage in their supply chains <strong>AND</strong> whether this data demonstrates progress. The company thus needs to fulfil two requirements: <br>\n <br>\nQuantitative data <br>\nTo fulfil this requirement, companies need to disclose quantitative data on living wages in their supply chain, for example: <br>\n1. % or number of supply chain workers that earn below a living wage (may be an estimate)  <br>\n2. % or number of suppliers that pay below a living wage (may be an estimate)  <br>\n3. % of suppliers audited that are in (non-)compliant with the payment of living wages  <br>\nOther types of quantitative data acceptable could be for example, specific agreements between the company and its suppliers aimed at advancing the payment of living wages within the supply chain (% of factories that have signed such agreements).<br>\nProgress <br>\nTo fulfil this requirement, the quantitative data reported by the company needs be comparable over at least two years and show progress in relation to the year prior.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Living_Wage_Progress+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134707,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Primary Carer Leave Requirement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Primary_Carer_Leave_Requirement.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Primary Carer Leave Requirement",
      "question": "Does the company require its suppliers to offer at least 14 weeks of paid primary carer leave to their workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality acknowledges that women workers in the<br>\nsupply chain bear the burden of family care, including children and elderly relatives, and requires its<br>\nsuppliers to provide family-friendly benefits. It recognises that work-life balance can drive positive<br>\nimpacts for workers (e.g. improved work-life balance), companies (e.g. increased worker retention)<br>\nand society as a whole (e.g. greater gender balance of unpaid care burden). Requiring its suppliers to<br>\nprovide these benefits to their workers further demonstrates a company’s commitment to gender<br>\nequality and women’s empowerment.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The company requires its suppliers to offer at least 14 weeks of paid primary carer leave to their workers.<br>\n2\\.A requirement to comply with local laws only is not sufficient.<br>\n3\\.Must be at least 2/3 paid.<br>\n4\\.Points are awarded even if there is a seniority clause (i.e. with the supplier for minimum one year)<br>\nPoints are awarded only if supplier discloses that the leave is \"at least\" or \"more than\" 14 weeks as this is the language of ILO convention. While the number of weeks disclosed by the supplier is captured by our research, points are not awarded if the disclosure reads \"up to\".",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Primary_Carer_Leave_Requirement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134723,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Secondary Carer Leave Requirement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Secondary_Carer_Leave_Requirement.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Secondary Carer Leave Requirement",
      "question": "Does the company require its suppliers to offer at least two weeks of paid secondary carer leave to their workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality acknowledges that women workers in the<br>\nsupply chain bear the burden of family care, including children and elderly relatives, and requires its<br>\nsuppliers to provide family-friendly benefits. It recognises that work-life balance can drive positive<br>\nimpacts for workers (e.g. improved work-life balance), companies (e.g. increased worker retention)<br>\nand society as a whole (e.g. greater gender balance of unpaid care burden). Requiring its suppliers to<br>\nprovide these benefits to their workers further demonstrates a company’s commitment to gender<br>\nequality and women’s empowerment.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The company requires its suppliers to offer at least two weeks of paid secondary carer leave to their workers.<br>\n2\\.A requirement to comply with local laws only is not sufficient.<br>\n3\\.Must be at least 2/3 paid.<br>\n4\\.Points are awarded even if there is a seniority clause (i.e. with the supplier for minimum one year)<br>\nPoints are awarded only if supplier discloses that the leave is \"at least\" or \"more than\" 2 weeks as this is the language of ILO convention. While the number of weeks disclosed by the supplier is captured by our research, points are not awarded if the disclosure reads \"up to\".",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Secondary_Carer_Leave_Requirement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134734,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Childcare Support",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Childcare_Support.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Childcare Support",
      "question": "Does the company help ensure its suppliers provide childcare support to their workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality acknowledges that women workers in the<br>\nsupply chain bear the burden of family care, including children and elderly relatives, and requires its<br>\nsuppliers to provide family-friendly benefits. It recognises that work-life balance can drive positive<br>\nimpacts for workers (e.g. improved work-life balance), companies (e.g. increased worker retention)<br>\nand society as a whole (e.g. greater gender balance of unpaid care burden). Requiring its suppliers to<br>\nprovide these benefits to their workers further demonstrates a company’s commitment to gender<br>\nequality and women’s empowerment.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.Company recognizes the importance of childcare support in its supply chains and expects its suppliers to provide the following or supports its suppliers in providing:<br>\na.On-site childcare facilities (e.g., cr√®che)<br>\nb.Childcare subsidies for off-site care<br>\nc.Referrals for off-site childcare facilities<br>\nd.Other<br>\n<br>\nAcceptable if support is provided for some suppliers through an initiative",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Childcare_Support+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134750,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Family Support",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Family_Support.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Family Support",
      "question": "Does the company help ensure its suppliers provide other family support to their workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality acknowledges that women workers in the<br>\nsupply chain bear the burden of family care, including children and elderly relatives, and requires its<br>\nsuppliers to provide family-friendly benefits. It recognises that work-life balance can drive positive<br>\nimpacts for workers (e.g. improved work-life balance), companies (e.g. increased worker retention)<br>\nand society as a whole (e.g. greater gender balance of unpaid care burden). Requiring its suppliers to<br>\nprovide these benefits to their workers further demonstrates a company’s commitment to gender<br>\nequality and women’s empowerment.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.Company recognizes the importance of other family support in its supply chains and expects its suppliers to provide the following or supports its suppliers in providing:<br>\na.Paid time off for breastfeeding and lactating<br>\nb.Paid time off to attend healthcare appointments with children/dependents<br>\nc.Flexible working options for parents or carers <br>\nd.Elder care or special needs care<br>\ne.Other (for example, education scholarships for children/dependents, insurance coverage for families, etc.)<br>\n<br>\nAcceptable if support is provided for some suppliers through an initiative",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Family_Support+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134766,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Worker Health and Safety Policy Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Worker_Health_and_Safety_Policy_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Worker Health and Safety Policy Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect the health and safety of its workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company should be transparent about health and safety impacts experienced by women<br>\nwho work for them and commit to providing a safe and healthy work environment for them.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe company has a policy statement committing respecting the ILO fundamental right to health and safety at work. This must be found in:<br>\n<br>\nThis is required to:<br>\n<br>\n1. Be a publicly available policy statement.<br>\n2. Use sufficient commitment language to commit to fundamental rights at work, in particular the right to health and safety.<br>\n3. The policy should cover all company's activities comprehensively and none should be excluded.<br>\n4. The policy should be applied consistently across all locations regardless of law. A commitment to or compliance with local/national laws alone is not accepted.<br>\nElement can also be met by the company committing to respect  all the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work  collectively (the ILO core labour standards or the ILO conventions on the fundamental rights at work) as it now incorporates the right to health & safety at work.<br>\n<br>\nThe term  hygienic‚ is not sufficient to meet this element's requirements. While related to occupational safety and health,  hygienic‚ focuses on cleanliness and sanitation, missing the broader physical, mental, and social well-being encompassed by  healthy‚ working conditions.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Worker_Health_and_Safety_Policy_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134777,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sex-Disaggregated Worker Health and Safety Data",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Worker_Health_and_Safety_Data.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sex-Disaggregated Worker Health and Safety Data",
      "question": "Does the company disclose sex-disaggregated information on health and safety for its workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company should be transparent about health and safety impacts experienced by women<br>\nwho work for them and commit to providing a safe and healthy work environment for them.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n  1\\.The company discloses sex-disaggregated data on health and safety information in line with GRI 403-9:<br>\na.The number and rate of fatalities as a result of work-related injuries <br>\nb.The number and rate of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) <br>\nc.The number and rate of recordable work-related injuries<br>\nd.The main types of work-related injuries <br>\ne.The number of hours worked. <br>\n<br>\n2\\.If the  rate  and/or  number  can be calculated, it does not need to be explicitly disclosed. <br>\n3\\. Types of work-related injuries  refers to injuries or illnesses (e.g. broken limbs, concussion, slips/falls/cuts) not activities (e.g. working at a height, heavy object handling).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Worker_Health_and_Safety_Data+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134793,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Maternal Health Coverage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Maternal_Health_Coverage.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Maternal Health Coverage",
      "question": "Does the company provide coverage of the costs associated with maternal health information and services?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality invests in women’s health and well-being,<br>\nincluding in maternal health, sexual and reproductive health (e.g. contraception, abortion, assisted<br>\nreproductive technologies), and mental health, stands to not only improve the lives, health and<br>\nworkforce participation of women employees but also generate business returns in terms of its<br>\nproductivity, recruitment, retention and reputation.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.\tThe company provides support to attendance to pre-natal and post-natal care for expectant and new mothers at work<br>\n2\\.\tThe company provides maternity insurance coverage. Maternity coverage needs to be specifically mentioned in the evidence.<br>\n3\\.\tThe company provides support to expectant and new mothers in any other ways. This could include flexibility in work arrangements in working hours beyond childcare and maternity leave or similar systems. Specific to new or expectant mothers only.<br>\n<br>\nGeneral statements as \"supporting mothers \"or  providing benefits to mothers‚ is not sufficient.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Maternal_Health_Coverage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134809,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sexual and Reproductive Health Coverage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sexual_and_Reproductive_Health_Coverage.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sexual and Reproductive Health Coverage",
      "question": "Does the company provide coverage of the costs associated with sexual and reproductive health information and services?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality invests in women’s health and well-being,<br>\nincluding in maternal health, sexual and reproductive health (e.g. contraception, abortion, assisted<br>\nreproductive technologies), and mental health, stands to not only improve the lives, health and<br>\nworkforce participation of women employees but also generate business returns in terms of its<br>\nproductivity, recruitment, retention and reputation.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.\tFor reproductive health we accept fertility treatment, breast and uterus cancer information, gynaecological services.We also accept birth control services. For maternity health, post and pre partum healthcare among others.<br>\n2\\.\tWe accept paid leave for fertility treatment and miscarriage.<br>\n3\\.\tUnder  health education services that promote preventive health  we can accept trainings, seminars, awareness campaigns that help increase awareness about breast cancer, HIV etc.Statements thatindicatethe company's recognition of critical sexual illness as HIV/AIDS and the importance to respond to these health issues is not sufficient.<br>\n4.Provision of general checkups and vaccinations recommended by theHealthauthority is not sufficient.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sexual_and_Reproductive_Health_Coverage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134825,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Mental Health Coverage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Mental_Health_Coverage.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Mental Health Coverage",
      "question": "Does the company provide coverage of the costs associated with mental health information and services?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality invests in women’s health and well-being,<br>\nincluding in maternal health, sexual and reproductive health (e.g. contraception, abortion, assisted<br>\nreproductive technologies), and mental health, stands to not only improve the lives, health and<br>\nworkforce participation of women employees but also generate business returns in terms of its<br>\nproductivity, recruitment, retention and reputation.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.At least online one-on-one sessions with licensed professionals (counselling, clinical counselling) or more. <br>\na. Licensed professionals  can be inferred through other terms as well like health specialists, doctors, psychologists etc. <br>\nb.Important to clarify that the service is provided by a health professional or an external service provider. <br>\nc. Mental health services that are focused on occupational mental health are enough if there are services provided after diagnosis. E.g. a stress test isn't enough, but support/counselling provided after the test counts.<br>\n2\\.Not acceptable if the service is just a stand-alone an internal questionnaire or app or an internal HR initiative without professional follow-ups.<br>\n3\\.Wellness programs, information services on Mental health and mental health workshops are not accepted. Access to a life coach, access to counselling (with no reference to mental health) are not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Mental_Health_Coverage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134836,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Health and Safety Policy Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Health_and_Safety_Policy_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Health and Safety Policy Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company have a publicly available statement of policy that expects its suppliers to commit to respecting the health and safety of their workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company should be transparent about health and safety impacts experienced by women<br>\nwho work in the supply chain. A company committed to gender equality requires its suppliers to<br>\naddress the specific health, safety and hygiene needs of women workers to reduce occupational<br>\nhealth risks in its supply chain. This is in a context where, for example, many workers may not have<br>\naccess to adequate toilet facilities or dedicated breastfeeding rooms and may be exposed to strenuous work and hazardous chemicals and dyes which have implications for their reproductive<br>\nhealth.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe company expects its business relationships to respect the ILO fundamental right to health and safety at work. This must be found in:<br>\n<br>\n1. A publicly available policy statement.<br>\n2. Use sufficient language expecting business partners to commit to respecting the ILO fundamental right of health and safety at work. Element would be met by placing a  requirement  instead of an  expectation  on business relationships. However, it would not be met by using language such as  business relationships are encouraged to respect .<br>\n3. The policy should cover all of company's business relationships comprehensively and none should be excluded.<br>\n4. The policy should be applied consistently across all locations regardless of law. A commitment to or compliance with local/national laws alone is not accepted.<br>\n5. Element can also be met by a requirement for suppliers to commit to respecting  all the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work  collectively (the ILO core labour standards or the ILO conventions on the fundamental rights at work) as it now incorporates the right to health & safety at work.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Health_and_Safety_Policy_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134852,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Gender-Responsive Health and Safety Requirements",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Gender_Responsive_Health_and_Safety_Requirements.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Gender-Responsive Health and Safety Requirements",
      "question": "Does the company require its suppliers to address the specific health, safety and hygiene needs of their women workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company should be transparent about health and safety impacts experienced by women<br>\nwho work in the supply chain. A company committed to gender equality requires its suppliers to<br>\naddress the specific health, safety and hygiene needs of women workers to reduce occupational<br>\nhealth risks in its supply chain. This is in a context where, for example, many workers may not have<br>\naccess to adequate toilet facilities or dedicated breastfeeding rooms and may be exposed to strenuous work and hazardous chemicals and dyes which have implications for their reproductive<br>\nhealth.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nAt least 4 examples are required for this element:<br>\na.Ensure adequate and safe toilet facilities for women workers that accommodate their hygiene needs, such as clean water and soap and disposal methods for feminine hygiene products. (NB: For toilets, we are looking for at a minimum gender-segregated facilities, but the company does not need to mention disposal methods for feminine hygiene products to tick the box.)<br>\nb.Regularly check company premises to ensure they are adequately lit and secure <br>\nc.Provide access to clean drinking water <br>\nd.Provide dedicated breastfeeding/lactating rooms that are clean and safe <br>\ne.Provide access to transportation to and from work and while on business travel (including in environments where public transport is unsafe or unavailable) <br>\nf.Provide training to staff on ergonomics, exposure to hazardous materials and other occupational risks, considering the differential biological impacts of health and safety on women and men <br>\ng.Provide personal protective equipment for men and women, taking into consideration the needs of pregnant and nursing women <br>\nh.Consult with men and women workers to determine if the health, safety and hygiene services and protections provided meet workers  needs<br>\ni.Evidence of women being required to be on the health and safety committee would be evidence of women being consulted to determine if the health, safety and hygiene services and protections provided meet workers  needs <br>\n<br>\nNote: providing ergonomics training, PPE, transport etc. does not need to specify women but could include all employees.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Gender_Responsive_Health_and_Safety_Requirements+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134868,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Health and Safety Performance Monitoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Health_and_Safety_Performance_Monitoring.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Health and Safety Performance Monitoring",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how it monitors the health and safety performance of its business relationships?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company should be transparent about health and safety impacts experienced by women<br>\nwho work in the supply chain. A company committed to gender equality requires its suppliers to<br>\naddress the specific health, safety and hygiene needs of women workers to reduce occupational<br>\nhealth risks in its supply chain. This is in a context where, for example, many workers may not have<br>\naccess to adequate toilet facilities or dedicated breastfeeding rooms and may be exposed to strenuous work and hazardous chemicals and dyes which have implications for their reproductive<br>\nhealth.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1. The company discloses how it monitors its suppliers  performance on health and safety. For example, a company can disclose that it conducts audits against a code of conduct in which it requires suppliers to commit to health and safety. <br>\n2. Only 'reserving the right' to conduct an audit or view supplier documents (or similar) is not sufficient.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Health_and_Safety_Performance_Monitoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134884,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Gender-Responsive Work Environment Support",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Gender_Responsive_Work_Environment_Support.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Gender-Responsive Work Environment Support",
      "question": "Does the company support its suppliers in ensuring a gender-responsive, safe and healthy work environment for their workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality supports its suppliers in providing access to a<br>\nsafe and healthy work environment for their women workers as well as support workers to realise their<br>\nreproductive health rights. It also recognises that many women workers in the supply chain lack<br>\ncritical health information and services and that supporting its suppliers to promote women’s health<br>\nand well-being, including in maternal health, sexual and reproductive health, and mental health, can<br>\nimprove the lives and workforce participation of the women workers.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.\tSupports provided must be related to building the suppliers and/or workers knowledge or awareness in how to ensure a gender responsive, safe and healthy work environment.<br>\n<br>\n2\\.\tTraining and other types of support are merged here.<br>\n<br>\na.\tSupport - Support can be in multiple forms (e.g. provide a Guidance Document, provide Capacity Building / Training, provide Best Practice Examples within the Supplier Code of Conduct). However simply having the issue in the Supplier Code of Conduct does not constitute support.<br>\nb.\tThe support provided to suppliers to gain the points in this question should be related to building the suppliers (and/or workers) knowledge/awareness in how to ensure a safe and healthy work environment for women<br>\nc.\tTraining - health and safety training to workers (e.g. required, encouraged, supported).<br>\n<br>\nPrograms that are related to advancing women's health more generally (e.g. sexual health programs, healthy eating, menstrual health) are not accepted here, they are accepted in element GEB D04.B",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Gender_Responsive_Work_Environment_Support+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134900,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Gender-Responsive Health Information and Services Support",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Gender_Responsive_Health_Information_and_Services_Support.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Gender-Responsive Health Information and Services Support",
      "question": "Does the company support its suppliers in providing their workers with access to gender-responsive health information and services?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality supports its suppliers in providing access to a<br>\nsafe and healthy work environment for their women workers as well as support workers to realise their<br>\nreproductive health rights. It also recognises that many women workers in the supply chain lack<br>\ncritical health information and services and that supporting its suppliers to promote women’s health<br>\nand well-being, including in maternal health, sexual and reproductive health, and mental health, can<br>\nimprove the lives and workforce participation of the women workers.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nCompany provides supports to suppliers covering at least three of the following gender-responsive health aspects:<br>\na.Menstrual health<br>\nb.Maternal health (e.g. breastfeeding support, prenatal and postpartum care)<br>\nc.Contraception/family planning<br>\nd.Reproductive cancers<br>\ne.STDs/STIs<br>\nf.Gender-based violence screen<br>\ng.Other (e.g. nutrition and anaemia; water and sanitation; pre-/post-natal care; infectious diseases; non-communicable diseases; maternal health; abortion (where legal); mental health; public health issues/outbreaks that can disproportionately impact women)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Gender_Responsive_Health_Information_and_Services_Support+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134916,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Workplace Violence and Harassment Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workplace_Violence_and_Harassment_Policy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Workplace Violence and Harassment Policy",
      "question": "Does the company have publicly available policies in place regarding violence and harassment in the workplace?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality demonstrates and enforces zero tolerance to<br>\nviolence and harassment in the workplace by having effective policies in place, providing regular<br>\nemployee training and actively taking additional preventative actions including trying to address any<br>\nelements of the company culture that may encourage violence and harassment.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe company has publicly available policies in place regarding <br>\nviolence and harassment in the workplace. It can be part of a Code of Conduct, Human Rights Policy, Whistleblower Policy or similar. <br>\n<br>\nIt must be clear the evidence is in a policy document or in an official report. If the evidence is contained in a policy document (or is a standalone policy), such as a global Code of Conduct, then it is accepted that it has received sign off at the highest level, even if that is not clearly indicated in the policy. <br>\nHowever, if the disclosure is contained on a webpage, a blog page <br>\nor a report, it will not be accepted as having received sign off at the highest level of the company governance.<br>\n<br>\nThe evidence must be specific to the workplace and cover all <br>\nemployees globally.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workplace_Violence_and_Harassment_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134932,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Workplace Violence and Harassment Training",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workplace_Violence_and_Harassment_Training.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Workplace Violence and Harassment Training",
      "question": "Does the company provide training on violence and harassment to its employees (e.g., bystander training)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality demonstrates and enforces zero tolerance to<br>\nviolence and harassment in the workplace by having effective policies in place, providing regular<br>\nemployee training and actively taking additional preventative actions including trying to address any<br>\nelements of the company culture that may encourage violence and harassment.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The evidence must make it clear that the training is covering violence and harassment in sufficient detail and that it is mandatory to all employees.<br>\n<br>\n2\\.Trainings that cover a very broad array of issues (including violence and harassment) cannot be accepted; examples are trainings that cover the whole Code of Conduct of a company. However, trainings that cover a limited number of issues (including violence and harassment) can be accepted; an example could be a training on Diversity and Inclusion (that also covers violence and harassment).<br>\n<br>\nEvidence to include information on the following:<br>\nWhat the training entails: <br>\na.Training defines what violence and harassment comprise <br>\nb.Training is conducted by a gender expert <br>\nc.Training is conducted in the local language <br>\nd.Training includes bystander training <br>\ne.Other <br>\n<br>\nTraining scope: <br>\nf.Training is mandatory for all full-time employees <br>\ng.Training is mandatory for all part-time employees <br>\nh.Training is conducted as part of the employee induction/on-boarding process <br>\n3\\.Training is conducted at least annually<br>\nOnline trainings and self-paced trainings can be accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workplace_Violence_and_Harassment_Training+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134953,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Workplace Violence and Harassment Prevention Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workplace_Violence_and_Harassment_Prevention_Actions.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Workplace Violence and Harassment Prevention Actions",
      "question": "Does the company take additional actions to help prevent violence and harassment in the workplace?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality demonstrates and enforces zero tolerance to<br>\nviolence and harassment in the workplace by having effective policies in place, providing regular<br>\nemployee training and actively taking additional preventative actions including trying to address any<br>\nelements of the company culture that may encourage violence and harassment.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The evidence must show specific actions, going beyond commitments or a policy. Examples include monitoring of actions that might lead to incidences of harassment within the workplace. It might also include initiatives that the company has created beyond policy that are geared toward employees preventing violence and harassment within the workplace as well as outside the workplace. A policy stating company has zero tolerance for harassment is not sufficient.<br>\n<br>\n2\\.Example of actions that are considered for this element:<br>\na.The company implements internal communications/campaigns that reinforce the company's zero tolerance of violence and harassment in the workplace<br>\nb.The company explores its culture to understand and address underlying gender social norms <br>\nc.The company has a process in place to monitor/assess business travel and client entertainment expenses to detect inappropriate business expenses such as company funds being used to sexually exploit women and girls or adult  entertainment  involving nudity or lewd behaviour <br>\nd.The company provides access to transportation to and from work and while on business travel (including in environments where public transport is unsafe or unavailable) <br>\ne.The company regularly checks company premises to ensure they are adequately lit and secure<br>\nf.The company has a policy and/or implements internal communications/campaigns on violence and harassment/gender-based violence outside of the workplace, e.g. on domestic violence.<br>\nOther",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workplace_Violence_and_Harassment_Prevention_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134969,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Workplace Violence and Harassment Perpetrator Consequences",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workplace_Violence_and_Harassment_Perpetrator_Consequences.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Workplace Violence and Harassment Perpetrator Consequences",
      "question": "Does the company outline clear consequences for the perpetrator(s) of violence and harassment grievances in the workplace?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality has an effective remediation process for<br>\naddressing violence and harassment grievances in the workplace. It implements a philosophy of<br>\n‘believing the victim’, does not require private arbitration or silencing agreements, supports the<br>\naggrieved party during remediation and has clear disciplinary actions for the perpetrator, including<br>\nalerting legal authorities if required. It monitors violence and harassment grievances (particularly of<br>\nwomen employees) and their effective remediation. It recognises that a safe working environment<br>\nreduces absenteeism and increases productivity and staff retention.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.While the remediation process does not need to be violence and harassment specific, the company will only receive a score if they have a policy on violence and harassment.<br>\n<br>\n2\\.The company provides a remediation process for violations of its code of conduct that includes clear disciplinary actions for perpetrators. Stating disciplinary actions for anyone who breaches the code of conduct is not enough.<br>\n<br>\n3\\.Features of a remediation process focused on the perpetrator or remediation process itself: <br>\na.The process outlines clear disciplinary action/sanctions for the perpetrator <br>\nb.The process sets out the process for alerting external authorities if the complaint is about criminal behaviour <br>\nThe process is regularly assessed and updated with the participation of women and men employees and/or gender experts.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workplace_Violence_and_Harassment_Perpetrator_Consequences+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24134985,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Survivor-Centric Workplace Violence and Harassment Grievance Process",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Survivor_Centric_Workplace_Violence_and_Harassment_Grievance_Process.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Survivor-Centric Workplace Violence and Harassment Grievance Process",
      "question": "Does the company have a survivor-centric process for addressing violence and harassment grievances in the workplace?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality has an effective remediation process for<br>\naddressing violence and harassment grievances in the workplace. It implements a philosophy of<br>\n‘believing the victim’, does not require private arbitration or silencing agreements, supports the<br>\naggrieved party during remediation and has clear disciplinary actions for the perpetrator, including<br>\nalerting legal authorities if required. It monitors violence and harassment grievances (particularly of<br>\nwomen employees) and their effective remediation. It recognises that a safe working environment<br>\nreduces absenteeism and increases productivity and staff retention.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.While the remediation process does not need to be violence and harassment specific, the company will only receive a score if they have a policy on violence and harassment.<br>\n<br>\n2\\.The company has a remediation process for addressing grievances in the workplace which takes a survivor-centric approach. <br>\n<br>\n3\\.Features of a remediation process focused on the victim: <br>\na.The process does not require private arbitration of violence and harassment claims (through company policy or mandatory arbitration clauses in employment contracts). <br>\nb.The process prohibits the inclusion of a confidentiality provision (non-disclosure/silencing agreement) in violence and harassment settlement agreements, unless requested by the victim <br>\nc.The process offers support for the aggrieved during/after remediation (e.g. leave from work, counselling/mental health support, financial/non-financial compensation, restitution) and utilizes root-cause analysis<br>\nOther",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Survivor_Centric_Workplace_Violence_and_Harassment_Grievance_Process+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24135001,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sex-Disaggregated Workplace Violence and Harassment Grievance Data",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Workplace_Violence_and_Harassment_Grievance_Data.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sex-Disaggregated Workplace Violence and Harassment Grievance Data",
      "question": "Does the company collect, analyse, and monitor sex-disaggregated data on the remediation of violence and harassment grievances?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality has an effective remediation process for<br>\naddressing violence and harassment grievances in the workplace. It implements a philosophy of<br>\n‘believing the victim’, does not require private arbitration or silencing agreements, supports the<br>\naggrieved party during remediation and has clear disciplinary actions for the perpetrator, including<br>\nalerting legal authorities if required. It monitors violence and harassment grievances (particularly of<br>\nwomen employees) and their effective remediation. It recognises that a safe working environment<br>\nreduces absenteeism and increases productivity and staff retention.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n  The evidence must include sex-disaggregated data of violence and harassment grievances remediation. It can be expressed in numbers or percentages, it can refer to any number of years (even just the last year), and it has to refer to remediated grievances, not to reported grievances.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sex_Disaggregated_Workplace_Violence_and_Harassment_Grievance_Data+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24135017,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Violence and Harassment Policy Requirement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Violence_and_Harassment_Policy_Requirement.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Violence and Harassment Policy Requirement",
      "question": "Does the company require its suppliers to have a violence and harassment policy that covers their workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality requires its suppliers to enforce and enact zero<br>\ntolerance to violence and harassment in the supply chain by requiring the presence of and access to<br>\nrelevant policies and by providing regular training and support to suppliers where necessary. It<br>\nrecognises that a safe working environment reduces absenteeism and increases productivity and staff<br>\nretention.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe evidence must show the company has a requirement to its suppliers to have a violence and harassment policy that covers their workers.<br>\n<br>\nThe evidence must be specific to the supply chain and cover all suppliers  employees globally. The evidence can for example be contained in a policy document (or is a standalone policy), such as a global Code of Conduct.<br>\nA statement is also sufficient on the part of the company.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Violence_and_Harassment_Policy_Requirement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24135033,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Violence and Harassment Policy Local Language Requirement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Violence_and_Harassment_Policy_Local_Language_Requirement.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Violence and Harassment Policy Local Language Requirement",
      "question": "Does the company require that the policy be made available in one or more local language(s)?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality requires its suppliers to enforce and enact zero<br>\ntolerance to violence and harassment in the supply chain by requiring the presence of and access to<br>\nrelevant policies and by providing regular training and support to suppliers where necessary. It<br>\nrecognises that a safe working environment reduces absenteeism and increases productivity and staff<br>\nretention.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe evidence must show that the company requires its suppliers to make the violence and harassment policy available in the languages spoken by their workers. It is not sufficient to have the violence and harassment policy to be translated in more than one language as that does not ensure all languages are covered.<br>\n<br>\nRather, it is necessary for the company to ensure all its suppliers  workers can access the violence and harassment policy by requesting suppliers to translate it to the relevant languages.<br>\nA statement saying the policy in made available in the languages of the workers (or that workers canunderstand) isalso accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Violence_and_Harassment_Policy_Local_Language_Requirement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24135049,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Violence and Harassment Training Requirement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Violence_and_Harassment_Training_Requirement.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Violence and Harassment Training Requirement",
      "question": "Does the company require its suppliers to provide training on violence and harassment to their managers and workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality requires its suppliers to enforce and enact zero<br>\ntolerance to violence and harassment in the supply chain by requiring the presence of and access to<br>\nrelevant policies and by providing regular training and support to suppliers where necessary. It<br>\nrecognises that a safe working environment reduces absenteeism and increases productivity and staff<br>\nretention.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe evidence must make it clear that the required training is covering violence and harassment in sufficient detail and that it is mandatory to suppliers  employees. Online trainings and self-paced trainings can be accepted. Trainings that cover a very broad array of issues (including violence and harassment) cannot be accepted; examples are trainings that cover the whole Code of Conduct of a company. However, trainings that cover a limited number of issues (including violence and harassment) can be accepted; an example could be a training on Diversity and Inclusion (that also covers violence and harassment).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Violence_and_Harassment_Training_Requirement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24135060,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Violence and Harassment Prevention Support",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Violence_and_Harassment_Prevention_Support.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Violence and Harassment Prevention Support",
      "question": "Does the company provide support to its suppliers to prevent violence and harassment in the supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality requires its suppliers to enforce and enact zero<br>\ntolerance to violence and harassment in the supply chain by requiring the presence of and access to<br>\nrelevant policies and by providing regular training and support to suppliers where necessary. It<br>\nrecognises that a safe working environment reduces absenteeism and increases productivity and staff<br>\nretention.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe company must show evidence that it supports its suppliers in implementing actions to prevent violence and harassment beyond what is already part of the other elements of this Measurement area. It is accepted when companies support their suppliers in preventing violence and harassment by providing training programs or working with local organizations to detect cases. The support programs do not need to cover the entire value chain and can be carried out with partner organizations.<br>\n<br>\nSupport could also include training provided by the company or an NGO or an audit process by the company of how its supply chain handles violence and harassment.<br>\n<br>\nA general audit on violence and harassment is not enough",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Violence_and_Harassment_Prevention_Support+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24135076,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Violence and Harassment Remediation Process Requirement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Violence_and_Harassment_Remediation_Process_Requirement.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Violence and Harassment Remediation Process Requirement",
      "question": "Does the company require its suppliers to have an effective remediation process for addressing violence and harassment grievances of their workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality requires its suppliers to have an effective<br>\nremediation process for addressing violence and harassment at work and monitors and supports its<br>\nsuppliers where necessary.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nEvidence shows that the company requires its suppliers to have a remediation program for violence and harassment, for example in its Suppliers  Code of Conduct. While the remediation process does not need to be violence and harassment specific, the company will only receive a score if they require suppliers to have a policy on violence and harassment.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Violence_and_Harassment_Remediation_Process_Requirement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24135092,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Violence and Harassment Grievance Remediation Monitoring",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Violence_and_Harassment_Grievance_Remediation_Monitoring.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Violence and Harassment Grievance Remediation Monitoring",
      "question": "Does the company monitor its suppliers' remediation process for addressing violence and harassment grievances filed by their workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality requires its suppliers to have an effective<br>\nremediation process for addressing violence and harassment at work and monitors and supports its<br>\nsuppliers where necessary.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nEvidence must show that the company commits to monitoring its suppliers  remediation process on violence and harassment cases. This can be done through audits, case-by-case follow ups, suppliers surveys, etc. It must be clear the company regularlyconducts such monitoring and follow up activities rather than reserving the right to do it in specific circumstances.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Violence_and_Harassment_Grievance_Remediation_Monitoring+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24135108,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supplier Sex-Disaggregated Violence and Harassment Grievance Data Requirement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Sex_Disaggregated_Violence_and_Harassment_Grievance_Data_Requirement.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supplier Sex-Disaggregated Violence and Harassment Grievance Data Requirement",
      "question": "Does the company require that its suppliers collect sex-disaggregated data on the remediation of violence and harassment grievances reported by their workers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality requires its suppliers to have an effective<br>\nremediation process for addressing violence and harassment at work and monitors and supports its<br>\nsuppliers where necessary.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe evidence must show the company requires its suppliers to track sex-disaggregated data of violence and harassment grievances remediation. It can be expressed in numbers or percentages, it can refer to any number of years (even just the last year), and it has to refer to remediated grievances, not to reported grievances. The evidence does not need to include the actual data.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supplier_Sex_Disaggregated_Violence_and_Harassment_Grievance_Data_Requirement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24135124,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Gender Stereotype-Free Marketing Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Stereotype_Free_Marketing_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Gender Stereotype-Free Marketing Commitment",
      "question": "Has the company made a public commitment to address how gender stereotypes are portrayed in its marketing campaigns?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality recognises the role of harmful gender<br>\nstereotypes in marketing and advertising to society and proactively manages its marketing approach<br>\nto ensure its marketing content is non-discriminatory and elevates women rather than degrades them.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The company has an advertising policy where it commits to avoiding offensive or dated stereotypes related to gender.<br>\n<br>\nFor example, in its Marketing/Advertising Policy or in a public statement from its CEO. Or membership in the UNWomen's Un stereotype Alliance. Must refer specifically to \"women\" <strong>AND</strong>/<strong>OR</strong> \"gender\".",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Stereotype_Free_Marketing_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24135140,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Non-Discriminatory Marketing Practices",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Non_Discriminatory_Marketing_Practices.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Non-Discriminatory Marketing Practices",
      "question": "Has the company taken specific actions to avoid discriminatory marketing practices?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality recognises the role of harmful gender<br>\nstereotypes in marketing and advertising to society and proactively manages its marketing approach<br>\nto ensure its marketing content is non-discriminatory and elevates women rather than degrades them.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.The company has taken specific actions to avoid discriminatory marketing practices. Examples of actions that are considered:<br>\na.The company has a marketing approach that seeks to challenge existing gender norms and promote positive portrayals of women and girls (products that defy harmful stereotypes are usually marketed, in which case would be picked up under this element)<br>\nb.The company reviews marketing materials and tactics to protect against negative gender stereotypes <br>\nc.The company consults with focus groups to ensure that marketing approaches do not perpetuating gender-based stereotypes <br>\nd.The company has a mechanism for screening marketing campaigns/materials <br>\ne.The company tracks the number of marketing-related complaints that relate to gender stereotyping and/or negative portrayals of women <br>\nOther",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Non_Discriminatory_Marketing_Practices+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24135156,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Gender Equality Community Initiatives",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Equality_Community_Initiatives.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Gender Equality Community Initiatives",
      "question": "Does the company support several initiatives to drive gender equality and women's empowerment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality supports initiatives that drive gender equality<br>\nand women’s empowerment in the communities where it operates and beyond (e.g. education, health<br>\nor finance programmes that explicitly benefit women and girls; proactive engagement and advocacy<br>\non the legal constraints that still limit women and girls globally due to gender discriminatory laws).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n1\\.\tThe company has more than one initiative to drive gender equality and women's empowerment. Examples of initiatives include:<br>\na.\tCash donations/ Grants (e.g. financial/pro-bono support for gender work, financial support to civil society organisations working to empower women/girls)<br>\nb.\tIn-kind donations (e.g. product/ facilities)<br>\nc.\tEmployee volunteering<br>\nd.\tAdvocacy<br>\ne.\tOther<br>\n2\\.\tPartnership with RISE (formerly BSR's HERProject) is also considered good practice if the programme is extended to women in the community beyond the factory workers, and in that case best practice would be that the company publishes information like which specific initiative they are supporting<br>\na.\tFinancial Health<br>\nb.\tRespect<br>\nc.\tFoundation<br>\nd.\tDigital (formerly HERFinance, HERHealth, HERrespect, HERessentials),<br>\ne.\twhich communities are participating.<br>\nIf the BSRHer Project works with women beyond the factories, it can be considered here.<br>\n<br>\nSupplier Diversity programmes are not accepted here.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Gender_Equality_Community_Initiatives+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24135172,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Women and Girls Community Initiative Beneficiary Tracking",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Women_and_Girls_Community_Initiative_Beneficiary_Tracking.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Women and Girls Community Initiative Beneficiary Tracking",
      "question": "Does the company track the number of women and girls benefiting from its community initiatives?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality supports initiatives that drive gender equality<br>\nand women’s empowerment in the communities where it operates and beyond (e.g. education, health<br>\nor finance programmes that explicitly benefit women and girls; proactive engagement and advocacy<br>\non the legal constraints that still limit women and girls globally due to gender discriminatory laws).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\nThe company reports the number of women and girls benefitting from its community initiatives mentioned in GEB F02.A.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Women_and_Girls_Community_Initiative_Beneficiary_Tracking+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24135188,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Women and Girls Community Initiative Feedback Collection",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Women_and_Girls_Community_Initiative_Feedback_Collection.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Women and Girls Community Initiative Feedback Collection",
      "question": "Does the company gather feedback from the women and girls benefiting from its community initiatives?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Gender Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance gender equality and women's empowerment, tracking how companies integrate gender across their governance and strategy, promote fair representation at all levels of leadership, close the gender pay gap, support workers' health and well-being, prevent violence and harassment, and drive gender equality through their supply chains and communities. The 2026 edition assessed 105 companies across two sectors identified as having a particularly significant impact on gender equality: apparel, and food and agriculture. Companies were scored on 91 elements across six measurement areas: governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, violence and harassment, and marketplace and community. The benchmark is designed to incentivise companies to move beyond policy commitments and take concrete, measurable action to respect and promote gender equality throughout their full value chains, keeping women workers' rights and human rights at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/gender-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A company committed to gender equality supports initiatives that drive gender equality<br>\nand women’s empowerment in the communities where it operates and beyond (e.g. education, health<br>\nor finance programmes that explicitly benefit women and girls; proactive engagement and advocacy<br>\non the legal constraints that still limit women and girls globally due to gender discriminatory laws).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance<br>\n<br>\n  The company reports the number of women and girls benefitting from its community initiatives mentioned in GEB F02.A and GEB F02.B.<br>\nThis could be through feedback gathered from participants after the initiative is complete, or it could be an impact study on what women and girls have done with the knowledge gained from the community initiatives after some time.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 105,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 105,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Women_and_Girls_Community_Initiative_Feedback_Collection+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136002,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Material Sustainability Impact Identification",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Material_Sustainability_Impact_Identification.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Material Sustainability Impact Identification",
      "question": "Does the company identify material sustainability impacts across its operations and value chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Impact materiality assessments allow companies to identify and prioritise their most<br>\nsignificant environmental, social and governance impacts. Embedding the results into their<br>\nsustainability strategy ensures that companies address these critical areas effectively, enhancing their<br>\nlong-term resilience and aligning the company’s operations with the SDGs.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must conduct an impact or sustainability materiality assessment and meet both of the following aspects:<br>\n<br>\nThe company must disclose material impacts across its operations and value chain. <br>\nThe organization must describe the criteria, sources or evidence it has used to identify and judge the materiality of the impacts. It must be clear that identified material sustainability impacts are based on actual or potential impacts, not merely the result of stakeholder preferences.<br>\n<br>\nExamples of criteria:<br>\nMagnitude of impact<br>\nLikelihood of impact<br>\nDuration of impact<br>\nSeverity or irreversibility<br>\n<br>\nExamples of sources and external standards and frameworks:<br>\nPublicly available company data and reports<br>\nAcademic and scientific research<br>\nIndustry best practices<br>\nNGO reports<br>\nGlobal Reporting Initiative (GRI): Provides guidelines for materiality assessments and impact reporting<br>\nSustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB): Industry-specific standards for material sustainability issues<br>\nTask Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD): Focused on climate risks and impacts.<br>\nTask Force on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD): Focused on environmental risks and impacts<br>\nUnited Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Identifies key global challenges that businesses can align with.<br>\nGuidance from regulatory bodies (e.g., European Commission‚s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive)<br>\n<br>\nTypes of evidence:<br>\nScenario and impact modelling<br>\nThird-party audits<br>\nBenchmark data<br>\nQuantitative data: e.g. measurements<br>\nQualitative data: e.g. interviews, case studies",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Material_Sustainability_Impact_Identification+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136018,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Material Impact Prioritisation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Material_Impact_Prioritisation.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Material Impact Prioritisation",
      "question": "Does the company identify and prioritise its most material impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Impact materiality assessments allow companies to identify and prioritise their most<br>\nsignificant environmental, social and governance impacts. Embedding the results into their<br>\nsustainability strategy ensures that companies address these critical areas effectively, enhancing their<br>\nlong-term resilience and aligning the company’s operations with the SDGs.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must conduct an impact or sustainability materiality assessment and meet both of the following aspects: <br>\nThe company must prioritise a set of material impacts (i.e. to act upon and report) based on their significance. A materiality matrix with an impact materiality axis alone is insufficient; the company must explicitly and unambiguously identify which material impacts it will prioritize.<br>\nThe company must describe the process, method, rationale or criteria used for prioritizing these impacts.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Material_Impact_Prioritisation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136034,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Materiality Stakeholder Consultation Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Materiality_Stakeholder_Consultation_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Materiality Stakeholder Consultation Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the stakeholders and experts consulted in determining its material impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Impact materiality assessments allow companies to identify and prioritise their most<br>\nsignificant environmental, social and governance impacts. Embedding the results into their<br>\nsustainability strategy ensures that companies address these critical areas effectively, enhancing their<br>\nlong-term resilience and aligning the company’s operations with the SDGs.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must consult relevant stakeholders (e.g. individuals and communities most directly impacted by the company) and/or experts to inform the identification of its material impacts and disclose who they are.It is not necessary to identify stakeholders by name (e.g. WBA, WWF), as confidentiality agreements may apply; general descriptions of the types of stakeholders and experts consulted are acceptable.<br>\n<br>\nStakeholders (a-c) and/or relevant experts (d-g) must include at least one of the following categories:<br>\naEmployees (if they are directly impacted parties)<br>\nbIndigenous peoples, local communities, and marginalized communities<br>\nc NGOs and advocacy groups (representing the interests of directly impacted groups)<br>\ndAcademia, scientific, and technical experts<br>\neLabor unions and workers‚ councils<br>\nfNGOs and advocacy groups<br>\ngYouth and student organizations",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Materiality_Stakeholder_Consultation_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136050,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sustainability Strategy Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainability_Strategy_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sustainability Strategy Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a sustainability strategy covering its material impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Impact materiality assessments allow companies to identify and prioritise their most<br>\nsignificant environmental, social and governance impacts. Embedding the results into their<br>\nsustainability strategy ensures that companies address these critical areas effectively, enhancing their<br>\nlong-term resilience and aligning the company’s operations with the SDGs.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must have a specific document clearly and explicitly labelled as a sustainability strategy,\" or a clearly identifiable stand-alone section(s) in another document that describes its sustainability strategy. This strategy must include all the following three aspects:<br>\nThe strategy must include forward looking aspects.<br>\nThe strategy must focus on integrating environmental, social and economic development (e.g. improving local conditions; increasing employment) considerations into its business, operations and planning. Hence the sustainability strategy shall not be seen as a separate, peripheral activity, but as central to the company‚s operations. <br>\nThe strategy must at least cover the priority material impacts (A01.B).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainability_Strategy_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136066,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Material Impact Target Setting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Material_Impact_Target_Setting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Material Impact Target Setting",
      "question": "Does the company set targets covering all its priority material impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Having concrete targets and plans allows companies to track progress and demonstrate<br>\naccountability towards their most material sustainability issues. Transparency in relation to targets and<br>\nplans ensures that the improvements companies make are measurable and impactful.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must disclose time-bound and measurable targets for each of the priority material impacts (A01.B). <br>\nEven if the company does not describe the process, method, rationale, or criteria used to prioritize its impacts, it can still meet this element as long as it clearly links each priority material impacts with time-bound and measurable targets. <br>\n<br>\nIf a priority material impact is not covered by a target, the company must specify why. The company must also describe progress made towards addressing the priority material topic. <br>\nThe reason, for example, may be because outcome-oriented targets are not applicable, or because the impact will be addressed via a policy or action plan.<br>\nProgress refers to alternative measures used to track performance on the topic, such as specific performance metrics or other measures of success.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Material_Impact_Target_Setting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136082,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Material Impact Target Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Material_Impact_Target_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Material Impact Target Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report against all the targets covering its priority material impacts?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Having concrete targets and plans allows companies to track progress and demonstrate<br>\naccountability towards their most material sustainability issues. Transparency in relation to targets and<br>\nplans ensures that the improvements companies make are measurable and impactful.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must provide information regarding its progress towards all of the targets covering its priority material impacts. <br>\nIf the company does not set targets covering all its priority material impacts (A02.A), it cannot meet this element. <br>\nIf the company is off-track on any of its targets, it must explain why this is the case.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Material_Impact_Target_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136098,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sustainability Strategy Action Plans",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainability_Strategy_Action_Plans.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sustainability Strategy Action Plans",
      "question": "Does the company disclose action plans for implementing its sustainability strategy and targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Having concrete targets and plans allows companies to track progress and demonstrate<br>\naccountability towards their most material sustainability issues. Transparency in relation to targets and<br>\nplans ensures that the improvements companies make are measurable and impactful.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company provides detailed descriptions of relevant and achievable short-term actions it expects to implement each of the priority material impacts (A01.B). If a priority material impact is not covered by a target, the action plan for that impact must be time-bound.<br>\nDepending on the content of the strategy, the action plans may refer to the continuation of existing initiatives and/or future initiatives. <br>\nEven if the company does not describe the process, method, rationale, or criteria used to prioritize its impacts, it can still meet this element as long as it clearly links each priority material impacts along with time-bound and measurable targets. <br>\nUnlike setting targets for priority material impacts (A02.A) to understand what the company wants to achieve, this element looks at how the company plans to get there.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainability_Strategy_Action_Plans+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136114,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sustainability Strategy Resource Allocation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainability_Strategy_Resource_Allocation.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sustainability Strategy Resource Allocation",
      "question": "Does the company allocate resources to implement its sustainability strategy?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Having concrete targets and plans allows companies to track progress and demonstrate<br>\naccountability towards their most material sustainability issues. Transparency in relation to targets and<br>\nplans ensures that the improvements companies make are measurable and impactful.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must identify the financial or human resources needed to implement its sustainability strategy, targets and/or plans. As this element is directly linked to the sustainability strategy (A01.D), targets (A02.A) and action plans (A02.C), a company cannot meet this element if it does not meet any of those three elements. If no additional resources are disclosed, the company must clearly state that no additional resources are necessary to implement its sustainability strategy. This may be, for example, because existing resources are sufficient.<br>\n<br>\nFor the resources that the company disclosed:<br>\nThe identified resources can be quantitative, such as financial allocation, or qualitative, such as the recruitment of a new role to lead a project.<br>\nDepending on the content of the strategy, the resources may refer to the continuation of existing allocation and/or future allocation.<br>\nCosts associated with the strategy, such as write-downs, site remediation, contract penalties, regulatory costs, are accepted as resources. <br>\nSite- or topic-specific investments are acceptable as long as they cover any of the priority material topics (A01.B).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainability_Strategy_Resource_Allocation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136130,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Governance Body Sustainability Responsibility",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Governance_Body_Sustainability_Responsibility.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Governance Body Sustainability Responsibility",
      "question": "Does the company assign responsibility for its sustainability strategy to its highest governance body?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Assigning responsibility for sustainability decision-making and oversight to the highest<br>\ngovernance body ensures strategic alignment and accountability at the top level. Additionally, having<br>\ndedicated functions, teams or committees can drive effective implementation of the sustainability<br>\nstrategy across the organisation. Linking senior executives’ remuneration to sustainability targets and<br>\nhaving a supervisory board with relevant expertise incentivises leadership to prioritise and achieve<br>\nmeaningful progress on the company’s most material sustainability issues.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis element assesses if companies assign responsibility for sustainability-related decision-making and oversight, including transition planning and climate change mitigation, to the highest governance body.Attributes required: Highest governance body responsible for the broader sustainability strategy and for climate change mitigation strategy/transition plan.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Governance_Body_Sustainability_Responsibility+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136146,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sustainability Implementation Responsibility Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainability_Implementation_Responsibility_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sustainability Implementation Responsibility Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the functions, teams or committees that are responsible for the implementation of its sustainability plans?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Assigning responsibility for sustainability decision-making and oversight to the highest<br>\ngovernance body ensures strategic alignment and accountability at the top level. Additionally, having<br>\ndedicated functions, teams or committees can drive effective implementation of the sustainability<br>\nstrategy across the organisation. Linking senior executives’ remuneration to sustainability targets and<br>\nhaving a supervisory board with relevant expertise incentivises leadership to prioritise and achieve<br>\nmeaningful progress on the company’s most material sustainability issues.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nCompanies are expected to disclose which functions, teams, or committees are responsible for implementing its sustainability plans, strategies, or activities, including those related to transition planning and climate change mitigation. It is sufficient to list the function, teams, and committees that are assigned responsibility; the allocation of responsibility between them need not be specified.**Attributes required:** Functions, teams or committees responsible for the implementation of sustainability plans, strategies, or activities, including climate change mitigation strategy/transition plan.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainability_Implementation_Responsibility_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136162,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Executive Remuneration Sustainability Linkage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Executive_Remuneration_Sustainability_Linkage.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Executive Remuneration Sustainability Linkage",
      "question": "Does the company link senior executive remuneration to its sustainability targets?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Assigning responsibility for sustainability decision-making and oversight to the highest<br>\ngovernance body ensures strategic alignment and accountability at the top level. Additionally, having<br>\ndedicated functions, teams or committees can drive effective implementation of the sustainability<br>\nstrategy across the organisation. Linking senior executives’ remuneration to sustainability targets and<br>\nhaving a supervisory board with relevant expertise incentivises leadership to prioritise and achieve<br>\nmeaningful progress on the company’s most material sustainability issues.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis element assesses if companies explicitly link senior executives' remuneration to metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) related to GHG emissions reductions, within its long-term incentive plan (likely to include equity in the company).Furthermore, additional environmental and/or social metrics and KPIs that are material to the company (e.g., percentage of sustainable sourcing of materials, single use plastic reduction, etc.) are expected to be linked to senior executives‚ remuneration.Climate targets are required to be linked to long-term incentives, whereas this is not mandatory for environmental and social targets.**Attributes required:** GHG emissions reduction metrics and KPIs linked to senior executives‚ remuneration through long-term incentive plans. Environmental and/or social targets in executive compensation structures.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Executive_Remuneration_Sustainability_Linkage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136178,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Governance Body Sustainability Expertise",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Governance_Body_Sustainability_Expertise.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Governance Body Sustainability Expertise",
      "question": "Does the company's highest governance body have expertise with respect to its material sustainability topics?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Assigning responsibility for sustainability decision-making and oversight to the highest<br>\ngovernance body ensures strategic alignment and accountability at the top level. Additionally, having<br>\ndedicated functions, teams or committees can drive effective implementation of the sustainability<br>\nstrategy across the organisation. Linking senior executives’ remuneration to sustainability targets and<br>\nhaving a supervisory board with relevant expertise incentivises leadership to prioritise and achieve<br>\nmeaningful progress on the company’s most material sustainability issues.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe companies are expected to prove that they have adequate climate change and low-carbon transition planning expertise represented at the highest governance body. There has to be at least two instances of expertise/competences related to climate change and the low-carbon transition represented among the members of the highest governance body. The instances are as follows:<br>\n- Academic qualification: An understanding of the impacts, risks and implementable solutions acquired via a bachelor‚s, master‚s or doctoral degree, professional certification, diploma, etc. A purely energy-related background with no relationship to climate change and the low GHG emissions transition is not enough to qualify as expertise.<br>\n- Professional experience: Previous employment with an organisation or in a role related to climate change or the low GHG emissions transition.<br>\n- Recent/active membership of relevant organisations: Positions in organisations driving corporate knowledge and action on climate change and the low GHG emissions transition. Examples include positions in bodies such as the World Business Council For Sustainable Development (WBCSD), or relevant industry associations for the sector the company operates in, such as the Solar Energy Industry Association (SEIA).<br>\n- Technical knowledge: Evidence of knowledge related to climate change and the low GHG emissions transition through recently published outputs written by the individual/committee, such as technical statements, industry reports, etc.The expertise does not all have to be held by one person; it can be distributed across different members of the board or highest governance body. The conditions for this element can also be met in instances where companies describe that the highest governance body has direct access to expertise, such as a specialised committee composed of external experts with a board member as the chairperson. In these cases, it must be specified what the scope of the committee is and how often it meets.Furthermore, the assessment also evaluates whether the highest governance body possesses expertise related to environmental (non-climate) or social impacts. As with the accepted types of expertise on the low-carbon transition, environmental and social expertise must fall within one of the four recognized categories of expertise.While the following list is non-exhaustive, the area of expertise should be relevant to the company‚s material impacts:<br>\n- Environment: biodiversity, ecosystems (e.g., conversion or restoration), circularity, soil health, water, air, hazardous materials, waste, plastic, and invasive species.<br>\n- Social: Human rights. Indigenous people, economic development, labour rights/rights, gender, and nutritionGeneral references to expertise or environmental, social, and governance (ESG) competence are insufficient, as they may reflect familiarity with reporting rather than expertise on actual impacts. Furthermore, competency matrices disclosed by companies alone do not suffice. Claimed expertise must be supported by objective evidence, such as detailed biographies of board members, so that relevant experience can be clearly classified under one of the four aforementioned types of expertise.\\*\\*Attributes required: \\*\\*Types and frequency of low-carbon transition-related expertise or competencies among members of the highest governance body, as well as the presence of environmental and social impact expertise within the body.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Governance_Body_Sustainability_Expertise+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136194,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Greenhouse Gas Emissions Target Setting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Target_Setting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Target Setting",
      "question": "Does the company set targets to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Food systems contribute to approximately a third of total global GHG emissions annually<br>\n(Crippa et al., 2021). Transforming food and land use systems is crucial to staying within the 1.5°C<br>\ntemperature rise, as highlighted in the recent COP28 UAE Declaration on Sustainable Agriculture, Resilient Food Systems and Climate Action (FOLU, 2024). This indicator focuses on companies’<br>\nemissions reductions in line with a 1.5°C trajectory as recommended by the Paris Agreement. The<br>\nindicator is also aligned with the interim target of the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) to reduce<br>\nvalue chain GHG emissions by 50% by 2030 and by 90-95% by 2050, in accordance with sectoral<br>\nambitions for 2030.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis element will be BASIC if:<br>\nValid Targets >= 1<br>\nAdditional conditions to be STANDARD:<br>\nALL of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n  Number of S1+2 valid targets >= 1<br>\n  ANY of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n    The following statement should not be true:<br>\n      Significant S3 Emissions<br>\n    Number of S3 valid targets >= 1<br>\nAdditional conditions to be ADVANCED:<br>\nIf:<br>\n  Significant S3 Emissions<br>\nThen:<br>\n  Valid Targets >= 4<br>\nElse:<br>\n  Number of S1+2 valid targets >= 2<br>\nAdditional conditions to be NEXT PRACTICE:<br>\nValid Targets >= 4<br>\nAdditional conditions to be LOW-CARBON ALIGNED:<br>\nALL of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n  Number of S1+2 SBTi validated targets >= 2<br>\n  ANY of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n    The following statement should not be true:<br>\n      Significant S3 Emissions<br>\n    Number of S3 SBTi validated targets >= 2",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Target_Setting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136210,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Progress",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Reduction_Progress.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Progress",
      "question": "Does the company report progress on reducing its greenhouse gas emissions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Food systems contribute to approximately a third of total global GHG emissions annually<br>\n(Crippa et al., 2021). Transforming food and land use systems is crucial to staying within the 1.5°C<br>\ntemperature rise, as highlighted in the recent COP28 UAE Declaration on Sustainable Agriculture, Resilient Food Systems and Climate Action (FOLU, 2024). This indicator focuses on companies’<br>\nemissions reductions in line with a 1.5°C trajectory as recommended by the Paris Agreement. The<br>\nindicator is also aligned with the interim target of the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) to reduce<br>\nvalue chain GHG emissions by 50% by 2030 and by 90-95% by 2050, in accordance with sectoral<br>\nambitions for 2030.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nCompanies are expected to disclose GHG emissions across relevant scopes and emissions categories, considering the sectoral context in which the company operates and its activity profile.The following conditions must be evaluated in order to properly score this element:<br>\n- GHG emissions from companies are reported at least on an annual basis.<br>\n- The company describes how its GHG emissions were calculated. o for real economy companies, the company mentions the GHG accounting standards it used, e.g. ISO 14064-1 or GHG Protocol. o financial institutions outline the methodology for calculating scopes 1, 2, and 3 emissions (including financed GHG emissions) and total footprint. This should include<br>\n- The company discloses its operational GHG emissions (scopes 1 and 2) as separate categories.<br>\n- The company specifies whether its reported scope 2 emissions are location-based and/or market-based. Companies belonging to electricity-intensive sectors shall report location-based scope 2 emissions and may also report market-based emissions. Companies in these sectors shall also report scope 3 category 3 emissions, which are associated with their electricity use.<br>\n- The company discloses its value chain (scope 3) emissions per category for all relevant scope 3 categories\\* and provides a relevant rationale for any excluded category. The relevance is identified in terms of the GHG emissions categories that most contribute to the overall profile of total GHG emissions in which the company sits.<br>\n- For sectors for which non-CO2 emissions are significant, the company must report the CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) for all relevant GHG emissions.<br>\n- The company has its GHG inventory independently certified.<br>\n- Avoided emissions and carbon credits should be reported separately.**Attributes required**: Full emissions inventory, methodology for calculating emissions, andindependent verification of emissions disclosure.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Reduction_Progress+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136226,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+1.5°C Sectoral Pathway Alignment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+1_5_C_Sectoral_Pathway_Alignment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "1.5°C Sectoral Pathway Alignment",
      "question": "Are the sectoral pathways used for target-setting compatible with a 1.5°C scenario?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Food systems contribute to approximately a third of total global GHG emissions annually<br>\n(Crippa et al., 2021). Transforming food and land use systems is crucial to staying within the 1.5°C<br>\ntemperature rise, as highlighted in the recent COP28 UAE Declaration on Sustainable Agriculture, Resilient Food Systems and Climate Action (FOLU, 2024). This indicator focuses on companies’<br>\nemissions reductions in line with a 1.5°C trajectory as recommended by the Paris Agreement. The<br>\nindicator is also aligned with the interim target of the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) to reduce<br>\nvalue chain GHG emissions by 50% by 2030 and by 90-95% by 2050, in accordance with sectoral<br>\nambitions for 2030.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis element will be MET if:<br>\nIf:<br>\n  Scoring Class is Financial sector<br>\nThen:<br>\n  ANY of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n    GMC\\_01889 is in 1.5¬∞C,Well-below 2¬∞C,2¬∞C,NA<br>\n    GMC\\_01894 is in 1.5¬∞C,Well-below 2¬∞C,2¬∞C,NA<br>\n    unspecified is in GMC\\_01898<br>\n    unspecified is in GMC\\_01899<br>\nElse:<br>\n  ALL of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n    ANY of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n      GMC\\_01879 = 1.5¬∞C<br>\n      GMC\\_01884 = 1.5¬∞C<br>\n      Scope 1+2 is in GMC\\_01898<br>\n      Scope 1+2 is in GMC\\_01899<br>\n    ANY of the following conditions should be true:<br>\n      Significant S3 Emissions = false<br>\n      GMC\\_01889 is in 1.5¬∞C,Well-below 2¬∞C,2¬∞C,NA<br>\n      GMC\\_01894 is in 1.5¬∞C,Well-below 2¬∞C,2¬∞C,NA<br>\n      Scope 3 is in GMC\\_01898<br>\n      Scope 3 is in GMC\\_01899<br>\n<br>\nGMC descriptions:<br>\n  GMC\\_01884: S1+2 long-term target SBTi temperature classification<br>\n  GMC\\_01889: S3 near-term target SBTi temperature classification<br>\n  GMC\\_01899: 1.5¬∞C pathway reference from credible institutions<br>\n  GMC\\_01894: S3 long-term target SBTi temperature classification<br>\n  GMC\\_01898: 1.5¬∞C pathway reference from SBTi Net-Zero standard or ISO Net-zero guidelines<br>\n  GMC\\_01879: S1+2 near-term target SBTi temperature classification",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+1_5_C_Sectoral_Pathway_Alignment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136247,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Ecosystem Risk Activity Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystem_Risk_Activity_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Ecosystem Risk Activity Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report on activities or commodities that pose the risk of ecosystem degradation or loss?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The UN has declared the ten years to 2030 the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration – a<br>\nrallying call for the protection and restoration of ecosystems for the benefit of both people and<br>\nnature. This indicator aligns with recommended disclosures by the European Sustainability Reporting<br>\nStandards (ESRS), Science Based Targets Network (SBTN) and the Taskforce on Nature-related<br>\nFinancial Disclosures (TNFD), and focuses on ensuring that companies protect and restore impacted<br>\necosystems in their operations and value chain.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis element has different requirements based on whether the companies are identified as belonging to industries which have a high land footprint, which include:<br>\nAgricultural products and commodities<br>\nAnimal proteins<br>\nFood and beverage manufacturers/processors<br>\nFood retailers<br>\nRestaurants or food services<br>\nPaper and forest<br>\nOil & gas<br>\nMetals and mining<br>\nConstruction materials<br>\n<br>\nThese companies must disclose quantitative data on at least one of the following: <br>\nIdentify conversion-driving commodities **and** disclose the proportion of these that are deforestation and conversion-free (DCF). Key conversion driving commodities include: timber, palm oil, cattle products, soy, coffee, cocoa, rubber<br>\nReport on the area (i.e. in ha, km2, acres) of land or aquatic habitat that is affected (i.e. converted, lost, or degraded) by its operations, <br>\nReport location information regarding all production units and project sites. These must be demarcated by georeferenced boundaries (i.e., polygons). For sectors with lower land footprints (less than 10 ha), a one point coordinate near the centre of production is sufficient.<br>\nReport on the proportion of land or aquatic ecosystems affected by the company‚s operations that have yet to be restored within a given time frame.<br>\nReport quantitative data on any other type of activities or commodities that it has identified as posing risks associated with ecosystem degradation or loss risks associated specifically with land/ water/ ocean-use change <br>\n<br>\nAs an exception to the general scoring principles, the company does not need to have 3 datapoints to meet this element. Only one is required. <br>\n<br>\nCompanies involved in high-impact commodities (HICs) that are not classified as conversion-driving commodities must explicitly identify these in their value chain and disclose at least one of MD2MD6, as appropriate (see Table 2).<br>\n<br>\nCompanies in other industries can also meet this element if they disclose at least one of the following:<br>\nDisclose activities or commodities that pose ecosystem degradation or loss risks via another impact driver (i.e. resource use, pollution or invasive species). They must make this connection explicitly.<br>\nProvide evidence that they have carried out an assessment that demonstrates that there is no risk of ecosystem degradation or loss via their operations or value chain.<br>\n<br>\nFor the above to be met, the company should provide at least some qualitative indication of the potential severity/ scale of actual or potential ecosystem degradation/ loss caused by the impact driver. Vague or generic references to ecosystem degradation and loss are insufficient.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystem_Risk_Activity_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136263,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystem_Protection_and_Restoration_Target.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Target",
      "question": "Does the company set a target to achieve ecosystem protection, restoration or regeneration?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The UN has declared the ten years to 2030 the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration – a<br>\nrallying call for the protection and restoration of ecosystems for the benefit of both people and<br>\nnature. This indicator aligns with recommended disclosures by the European Sustainability Reporting<br>\nStandards (ESRS), Science Based Targets Network (SBTN) and the Taskforce on Nature-related<br>\nFinancial Disclosures (TNFD), and focuses on ensuring that companies protect and restore impacted<br>\necosystems in their operations and value chain.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nCompanies must provide quantitative and time-bound targets associated with ecosystem protection, restoration or regeneration. Examples of valid targets could relate to:<br>\nAchieving deforestation and conversion-free (DCF) status for **all **of the company‚s most relevant conversion-driving commodities. If the company excludes any of its commodities in this target, it must explicitly explain why. Targets must aim for 100% of commodity volumes to be DCF. **A baseline value and year are not required**.<br>\nEnsuring all production sites and project locations adhere to no-conversion standards. For a no-conversion target to be valid, the company must report location information regarding all production units and project sites. Targets that would continue to allow any degradation or conversion (including deforestation) past 2020 are not valid (in alignment with SBTN and the [Accountability Framework initiative](https://accountability-framework.org/fileadmin/uploads/afi/Documents/Operational_Guidance/OG_Environmental_Restoration_Compensation-2020-52.pdf)). Thus, targets that seek to reduce rather than avoid ecosystem conversion or degradation are not valid. **A baseline value and year are required**, and this should be no later than 2020 (based on SBTN guidance). <br>\nA goal to reduce total land footprint. It must be clear that the reduction includes all of the company‚s (or its supply chain‚s) operations, rather than just a specific site or subset of them, as this could otherwise lead to leakage (reduction in one site offset by an increase in another). **A baseline value and year are required**, and this should be no earlier than 2015.<br>\nA goal to restore degraded ecosystems affected by the company‚s operations. **A baseline value and year are required**. Restoration targets are only valid for companies following best practices such as those described by the [Accountability Framework initiative](https://accountability-framework.org/fileadmin/uploads/afi/Documents/Operational_Guidance/OG_Environmental_Restoration_Compensation-2020-52.pdf). These include initiatives such as prioritising restoration in locations with the greatest ecological importance or harm, focusing on reinstating ecological processes and services, prioritising native species in reforestation or habitat rebuilding, ensuring restoration does not displace or degrade surrounding areas, collaborating with local and indigenous communities, or implementing ongoing monitoring to ensure long-term effectiveness. ‚Äã<br>\nA goal to source 100% of its commodities from areas known to be conversion-free from 2020. **A baseline value and year are required**.<br>\nA requirement for all direct and indirect suppliers to adopt and implement ecosystem protection, restoration or regeneration targets across their entire businesses. The company must have a non-compliance protocol in place for suppliers. **A baseline value and year are not required.**<br>\n<br>\nIf (i) all the company‚s conversion-driving commodities are conversion-free, or (ii) it has 100% restored all degraded ecosystems, or (iii) it provides evidence that they have carried out an assessment that demonstrates that there is no risk of ecosystem degradation or loss via their operations or value chain, they meet this element.<br>\n<br>\nFollowing guidance from SBTN, we may also accept targets with the following format: <br>\n[Company name] will have zero conversion of natural ecosystems by [target year], compared with a 2020 baseline.<br>\n[Company name] will remediate all past conversion occurring between 2020 and [target year].<br>\n[Company name] commits to reduce absolute agricultural land footprint, from direct operations [and upstream impacts], [percent reduction] by [target year] from a [base year] base year.<br>\n[Company name] will source 100% of volumes of commodities from areas known to be conversion-free from 2020.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystem_Protection_and_Restoration_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136284,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Progress",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystem_Protection_and_Restoration_Progress.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Progress",
      "question": "Does the company report progress towards ecosystem protection, restoration or regeneration?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The UN has declared the ten years to 2030 the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration – a<br>\nrallying call for the protection and restoration of ecosystems for the benefit of both people and<br>\nnature. This indicator aligns with recommended disclosures by the European Sustainability Reporting<br>\nStandards (ESRS), Science Based Targets Network (SBTN) and the Taskforce on Nature-related<br>\nFinancial Disclosures (TNFD), and focuses on ensuring that companies protect and restore impacted<br>\necosystems in their operations and value chain.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must report quantitate progress over 3 consecutive years. If the company has a target, it must report progress against it. If the company does not have a target, it must demonstrate it is effectively protecting ecosystems, for example by reporting: <br>\nAn increase in the uptake of DCF-aligned certifications for key commodities (see Table 1) sourced through its supply chain (i.e. an increase in % of commodities certified to DCF standards)<br>\nReductions in the total land footprint. It must be clear that the reduction includes all the company‚s (or its supply chain‚s) operations, rather than just a specific site or subset of them, as this could otherwise lead to leakage (reduction in one site offset by an increase in another).<br>\nHaving achieved no conversion and providing information regarding all production units and project sites. These must be demarcated by georeferenced boundaries (i.e., polygons), with the exception of small sites (less than 10 ha), for which one point coordinate near the centre of production is sufficient.<br>\nProgress towards full restoration of affected ecosystems. Progress on restoration is only valid for companies following best practices such as those described by the [Accountability Framework initiative](https://accountability-framework.org/fileadmin/uploads/afi/Documents/Operational_Guidance/OG_Environmental_Restoration_Compensation-2020-52.pdf).<br>\n<br>\nIf the company explicitly states and provides evidence to justify that its operations and supply chain have achieved no conversion (e.g. all the company‚s high-risk commodities are conversion-free, or it has 100% restored all degraded ecosystems), they meet this element.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Ecosystem_Protection_and_Restoration_Progress+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136300,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Value Chain Traceability Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Value_Chain_Traceability_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Value Chain Traceability Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how it supports traceability along the value chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The UN has declared the ten years to 2030 the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration – a<br>\nrallying call for the protection and restoration of ecosystems for the benefit of both people and<br>\nnature. This indicator aligns with recommended disclosures by the European Sustainability Reporting<br>\nStandards (ESRS), Science Based Targets Network (SBTN) and the Taskforce on Nature-related<br>\nFinancial Disclosures (TNFD), and focuses on ensuring that companies protect and restore impacted<br>\necosystems in their operations and value chain.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must do one of the following:<br>\nProvide a description of traceability systems that are in place, which includes at least an explanation of how the company traces products. The system may be electronic (e.g. using blockchain, RFID tags) or paper-based. A company only mentioning that they have a traceability system without a description or explanation is not enough.<br>\nDisclose the key data elements (KDEs) that they collect. KDEs are crucial pieces of information used in traceability systems to track the movement and history of products through the supply chain (e.g. traceability lot code, date of harvesting, location of extraction, supplier information)<br>\nEngage with others in their value chain to support traceability (e.g. by doing supplier audits, collaboration on data sharing, or joint initiatives to improve traceability). The company must mention concrete outcomes being achieved. <br>\nCollaborate with NGOs or industry initiatives focused on traceability (e.g. Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, or Responsible Cobalt Initiative). The company must mention concrete outcomes being achieved.<br>\nDisclose the identity of their direct and indirect suppliers.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Value_Chain_Traceability_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136321,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainable_Fisheries_and_Aquaculture_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report on its sustainable fisheries and aquaculture operations and products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Aquatic systems are increasingly recognised as vital for food security, nutrition and<br>\nsustaining livelihoods. In 2022, global fisheries and aquaculture production reached 223.2 million<br>\ntonnes, constituting about 15% of the world’s animal protein supply, with levels exceeding 50% in<br>\nseveral countries across Africa and Asia. However, the sector faces significant challenges, including<br>\nbiodiversity loss, climate change, natural disasters, pollution, water scarcity and other anthropogenic<br>\nimpacts (FAO, 2024). To safeguard fish populations and marine biodiversity, companies need to<br>\ncontribute to sustainable management of marine aquatic resources.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must report on the proportion of fisheries and/or aquaculture operations:<br>\n      Covering its whole portfolio, i.e. all companies‚ seafood species, products and operations.<br>\n      Covered by one or more of the following certifications/ratings/programmes:<br>\n      Certification schemes (e.g., MSC, ASC, Global GAP, BAP, BSP, MarinTrust)<br>\n      Improvement programmes (SASSI standards FIPs, AIPs, MarinTrust improver programme). The company must report on the list of FIPs, AIPs and respective ratings<br>\n      Ratings\\* (e.g., Seafood Watch program)<br>\n      FishSource scores. Same comment as above for green rating.<br>\n<br>\nFor animal feed manufacturers and aquaculture (farmed fish companies): the reporting must include marine feed ingredients<br>\n<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable only to companies with animal proteins (seafood) as a part of their operations or supply chain.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainable_Fisheries_and_Aquaculture_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136337,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainable_Fisheries_and_Aquaculture_Target.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture Target",
      "question": "Does the company set a target for sustainable fisheries and aquaculture covering its operations and products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Aquatic systems are increasingly recognised as vital for food security, nutrition and<br>\nsustaining livelihoods. In 2022, global fisheries and aquaculture production reached 223.2 million<br>\ntonnes, constituting about 15% of the world’s animal protein supply, with levels exceeding 50% in<br>\nseveral countries across Africa and Asia. However, the sector faces significant challenges, including<br>\nbiodiversity loss, climate change, natural disasters, pollution, water scarcity and other anthropogenic<br>\nimpacts (FAO, 2024). To safeguard fish populations and marine biodiversity, companies need to<br>\ncontribute to sustainable management of marine aquatic resources.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe target must:<br>\nCover company‚s whole portfolio, i.e. all companies‚ seafood species, products and operations<br>\nReference one of the certification/sustainability programmes mentioned in element A<br>\nAnimal feed manufacturers and aquaculture: the target must include marine feed ingredients<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable only to companies with animal proteins (seafood) as a part of their operations or supply chain.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainable_Fisheries_and_Aquaculture_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136353,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture Progress",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainable_Fisheries_and_Aquaculture_Progress.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture Progress",
      "question": "Does the company report progress on maintaining sustainable fisheries and aquaculture operations and products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Aquatic systems are increasingly recognised as vital for food security, nutrition and<br>\nsustaining livelihoods. In 2022, global fisheries and aquaculture production reached 223.2 million<br>\ntonnes, constituting about 15% of the world’s animal protein supply, with levels exceeding 50% in<br>\nseveral countries across Africa and Asia. However, the sector faces significant challenges, including<br>\nbiodiversity loss, climate change, natural disasters, pollution, water scarcity and other anthropogenic<br>\nimpacts (FAO, 2024). To safeguard fish populations and marine biodiversity, companies need to<br>\ncontribute to sustainable management of marine aquatic resources.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company reports a monotonic increase in the proportion of sustainable fisheries and aquaculture over the previous three reporting periodsyears. Reporting requirements are the same as element A and regarding coverage and certifications, programmes, ratings accepted.<br>\nIf the company demonstrate it has achieved 100% sustainable portfolio, it automatically meet element a, b, and c.<br>\nAnimal feed manufacturers and aquaculture: the reporting must include marine feed ingredients<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable only to companies with animal proteins (seafood) as a part of their operations or supply chain.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainable_Fisheries_and_Aquaculture_Progress+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136369,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Digital Traceability Commitment for Fisheries and Aquaculture",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Digital_Traceability_Commitment_for_Fisheries_and_Aquaculture.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Digital Traceability Commitment for Fisheries and Aquaculture",
      "question": "Does the company set a time-bound commitment to achieve digital and interoperable traceability for its fisheries and aquaculture operations and products?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Aquatic systems are increasingly recognised as vital for food security, nutrition and<br>\nsustaining livelihoods. In 2022, global fisheries and aquaculture production reached 223.2 million<br>\ntonnes, constituting about 15% of the world’s animal protein supply, with levels exceeding 50% in<br>\nseveral countries across Africa and Asia. However, the sector faces significant challenges, including<br>\nbiodiversity loss, climate change, natural disasters, pollution, water scarcity and other anthropogenic<br>\nimpacts (FAO, 2024). To safeguard fish populations and marine biodiversity, companies need to<br>\ncontribute to sustainable management of marine aquatic resources.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company‚s commitment must:<br>\n        Cover 100% of seafood portfolio, stock inputs and feed (marine and terrestrial)<br>\n        Mention the goal of being able to trace products to vessel/farm/feed source<br>\n        Mention alignment with leading standards such as the GDST and, when relevant, the ASC feed standard<br>\n<br>\nDigital: digital traceability means that the relevant data is stored electronically, rather than in paper systems. Storing data electronically enables systems to communicate information easily, reduces the opportunity for human error, and improves data security.<br>\nInteroperable: means that the data is stored and represented in a universal way among different operators so that different supply chain actors can read, communicate, and interpret data consistently without the need for transforming data.<br>\n<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable only to companies with animal proteins (seafood) as a part of their operations or supply chain.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Digital_Traceability_Commitment_for_Fisheries_and_Aquaculture+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136390,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Sustainable Agriculture and Soil Health Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainable_Agriculture_and_Soil_Health_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Sustainable Agriculture and Soil Health Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report on its sustainable agriculture practices to improve soil health?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "According to the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO, 2021b), approximately one-<br>\nthird of the world’s soils show moderate to high degradation. Soil erosion causes significant negative<br>\nimpacts, such as disrupting the soil’s ability to store and cycle carbon, nutrients and water, and<br>\nreducing crop yields – resulting in production losses of around 7.6 million tonnes for cereals alone.<br>\nCompanies have the opportunity to implement and scale up regenerative agricultural practices, which<br>\ncan enhance soil health, increase biodiversity and boost total productivity and the nutritional status of<br>\ndiets, while reducing the need for water and other agricultural inputs (FOLU, 2023).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must disclose data on the scale of regenerative and sustainable agricultural practices. It can provide data on:<br>\n\tLand managed or sourced from under sustainable/regenerative agriculture practices (hectares)<br>\n\tpercentage of ingredients/commodities grown or sourced from sustainable/regenerative agriculture practices<br>\n\tNumber of farmers trained to adopt sustainable agricultural practices, including responsible nutrient management (4R principles), Integrated pest management<br>\nFor chemical manufacturers, disclosure on number of farmers trained on the responsible use of fertilizers and/or pesticides can be counted as evidence.<br>\n<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is not applicable to companies only operating in the seafood sector (fishing and aquaculture).<br>\n<br>\nDefinition<br>\nRegenerative, climate-smart, agroecological and other good agricultural practices that reduce soil erosion, promote soil health and increase biodiversity.<br>\nExamples of sustainable/regenerative agricultural practices<br>\ncrop rotation, cover crops, agroforestry, mixed farming systems diversity, intercropping, no- or reduced-tillage agriculture integrated crop-livestock farming and systems to increase the diversity and variety of plants, animals, and microorganisms.‚ÄØBut also responsible nutrient management (4R principles), Integrated pest management, organic farming, alternatives methods to synthetic pesticides/fertilisers",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Sustainable_Agriculture_and_Soil_Health_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136406,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Fertiliser and Pesticide Use Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Fertiliser_and_Pesticide_Use_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Fertiliser and Pesticide Use Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report on its use of fertilisers and pesticides?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "According to the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO, 2021b), approximately one-<br>\nthird of the world’s soils show moderate to high degradation. Soil erosion causes significant negative<br>\nimpacts, such as disrupting the soil’s ability to store and cycle carbon, nutrients and water, and<br>\nreducing crop yields – resulting in production losses of around 7.6 million tonnes for cereals alone.<br>\nCompanies have the opportunity to implement and scale up regenerative agricultural practices, which<br>\ncan enhance soil health, increase biodiversity and boost total productivity and the nutritional status of<br>\ndiets, while reducing the need for water and other agricultural inputs (FOLU, 2023).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company can report on:<br>\n        Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), ratio of total N inputs and total N outputs to produce a crop, animal product or agrifood product and disclose the calculation methodology<br>\n        Phosphorus balance, phosphorus input, phosphorus output<br>\n        The volume and intensity of pesticides used/manufactured by the following toxicity hazard levelsWHO classification (2019)<br>\n Extremely hazardous;<br>\n Highly hazardous;<br>\n Moderately hazardous;<br>\n Slightly hazardous;<br>\n Unlikely to present an acute hazard<br>\n        percentage of reduction in input (fertilisers and/or pesticide) use<br>\n        Revenues or quantity of pesticides manufactured (tonnes) by toxicity hazard level<br>\n(TNFD, GRI 13)<br>\n<br>\nFertilisers manufacturers can report on:<br>\n        Quantity of fertilisers manufactured (tonnes) with improved nutrient efficiency, with reused and recycled materials/nutrients with clear reduced impact on soil health and emissions<br>\n<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is not applicable to companies only operating in the seafood sector (fishing and aquaculture)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Fertiliser_and_Pesticide_Use_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136422,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Soil Health Target Setting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Soil_Health_Target_Setting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Soil Health Target Setting",
      "question": "Does the company set a target to improve soil health?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "According to the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO, 2021b), approximately one-<br>\nthird of the world’s soils show moderate to high degradation. Soil erosion causes significant negative<br>\nimpacts, such as disrupting the soil’s ability to store and cycle carbon, nutrients and water, and<br>\nreducing crop yields – resulting in production losses of around 7.6 million tonnes for cereals alone.<br>\nCompanies have the opportunity to implement and scale up regenerative agricultural practices, which<br>\ncan enhance soil health, increase biodiversity and boost total productivity and the nutritional status of<br>\ndiets, while reducing the need for water and other agricultural inputs (FOLU, 2023).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company has a time-bound target to improve soil health through the implementation of sustainable and regenerative agriculture practices.<br>\n<br>\nExamples of targets:<br>\nIncreasing land area under sustainable/regenerative agricultural practices (hectares)<br>\n        Increasing the percentage of ingredients/commodities sourced from sustainable/regenerative agriculture practices<br>\n        Soil health improvements. e.g. reduction of soil erosion, increase soil carbon content<br>\n        Increase number of farmers trained or land under integrated pest management, precision fertilisers applications (4R principles, controlled-released)<br>\n<br>\nThe company must specify the type of agricultural practices/land management used;<br>\nIf the company has a target on regenerative agriculture‚, it must include the responsible use of agricultural input (fertilisers and pesticides).<br>\n<br>\nExamples:<br>\n        The company‚s framework for regenerative agriculture includes optimisation of fertilisers through improved nutrient efficiency, precision fertilisers applications (e.g. 4R principles), responsible or integrated nutrient management.‚ÄØAnd/or minimisation of fertilisers through integrated pest management, alternatives technics to reduce the use of synthetic input.<br>\n<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is not applicable to companies only operating in the seafood sector (fishing and aquaculture)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Soil_Health_Target_Setting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136443,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Soil Health Improvement Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Soil_Health_Improvement_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Soil Health Improvement Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report improvements in soil health as a result of its practices?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "According to the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO, 2021b), approximately one-<br>\nthird of the world’s soils show moderate to high degradation. Soil erosion causes significant negative<br>\nimpacts, such as disrupting the soil’s ability to store and cycle carbon, nutrients and water, and<br>\nreducing crop yields – resulting in production losses of around 7.6 million tonnes for cereals alone.<br>\nCompanies have the opportunity to implement and scale up regenerative agricultural practices, which<br>\ncan enhance soil health, increase biodiversity and boost total productivity and the nutritional status of<br>\ndiets, while reducing the need for water and other agricultural inputs (FOLU, 2023).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses data (at the global or local/farm level) related to its regenerative and sustainable agriculture practices (own operations and/or sourcing). These metrics can be linked to soil health improvements, increased (agro)biodiversity, carbon sequestration.<br>\nExamples of metrics include:<br>\n\tsoil erosion: Metric tons/ha<br>\n\tsoil organic carbon: MT CO2e total; SOC/Area or tons of carbon/ha; % of organic carbon content<br>\n\tGreen water: Soil water holding capacity (%)<br>\n\tEnvironmental Impact Quotient field-use ratings (EIQ score ecological<br>\n\tInfiltration rate: mm/hr<br>\n\tAvailability of soil nutrients to plants: Amount (mg/kg) of plant available macro/ micronutrient in soil sample (N, P, K, SOM)<br>\n\tSoil microbial diversity: Microbial biomass; DNA-based metrics<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is not applicable to companies only operating in the seafood sector (fishing and aquaculture)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Soil_Health_Improvement_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136464,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Water Use Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Water_Use_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Water Use Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report on its water use?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "According to the United Nations, nearly two-thirds of the global population experiences<br>\nsevere water scarcity for at least one month a year, and over two billion people live in countries with<br>\ninadequate water supply. By 2025, half of the world’s population could face water scarcity, and by<br>\n2040, one in four children may live in areas with extreme water stress. Food systems account for<br>\napproximately 70% of freshwater withdrawals globally (FAO, 2021b, Willet et al., 2019). This<br>\nunderscores the significant role companies play in water consumption and the need for sustainable<br>\nand transparent water management practices.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must report the following metrics on the company‚s entire operations:<br>\nWater withdrawal<br>\nWater consumption<br>\nWater withdrawal and consumption from water-stressed areas, at least from areas with high water stress and above<br>\n<br>\nWater-stressed areas must be identified following a recognized tool or methodology (e.g., the WRI Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas).<br>\nDatapoint must be from the most recent reporting period. Intensity metrics are not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Water_Use_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136483,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Water Use Reduction Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Water_Use_Reduction_Target.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Water Use Reduction Target",
      "question": "Does the company set a target to reduce its water use?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "According to the United Nations, nearly two-thirds of the global population experiences<br>\nsevere water scarcity for at least one month a year, and over two billion people live in countries with<br>\ninadequate water supply. By 2025, half of the world’s population could face water scarcity, and by<br>\n2040, one in four children may live in areas with extreme water stress. Food systems account for<br>\napproximately 70% of freshwater withdrawals globally (FAO, 2021b, Willet et al., 2019). This<br>\nunderscores the significant role companies play in water consumption and the need for sustainable<br>\nand transparent water management practices.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must set a target on its water withdrawal <strong>OR</strong> water consumption that covers at least its own operations (including aggregated targets, e.g. reducing total net water consumption). If the target covers only a subset of the company‚s operations or value chain (e.g. a specific water basin; specific water-stressed areas), it should be methodologically justified.<br>\n<br>\nFor a list of methodologies the companies could use, refer to element (d).<br>\n<br>\nTargets must be timebound, with a defined baseline value and year, and include clear, quantitative, and measurable metrics. They should focus on short-term progress up to 2030, with any longer-term goals broken down into interim targets no more than five years apart. Intensity targets are not accepted, as they do not ensure absolute improvements. Year-on-year targets and qualitative targets may be accepted on a case-by-case basis, depending on their ambition and measurability. Any changes to targets or their underlying assumptions must be explained, particularly in terms of impact on comparability. Additionally, targets aimed solely at maintaining current performance are not accepted.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Water_Use_Reduction_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136501,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Water Use Reduction Progress",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Water_Use_Reduction_Progress.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Water Use Reduction Progress",
      "question": "Does the company report progress on reducing its water use?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "According to the United Nations, nearly two-thirds of the global population experiences<br>\nsevere water scarcity for at least one month a year, and over two billion people live in countries with<br>\ninadequate water supply. By 2025, half of the world’s population could face water scarcity, and by<br>\n2040, one in four children may live in areas with extreme water stress. Food systems account for<br>\napproximately 70% of freshwater withdrawals globally (FAO, 2021b, Willet et al., 2019). This<br>\nunderscores the significant role companies play in water consumption and the need for sustainable<br>\nand transparent water management practices.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must report on both withdrawal and consumption for its entire operations. It must report year-on-year, absolute reductions for three consecutive years on one of the two. If the company reports data on withdrawal and consumption, but is only improving in one, the element is only Met if it is not worsening in the other.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Water_Use_Reduction_Progress+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136517,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Water Pollutant Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Water_Pollutant_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Water Pollutant Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report on its water pollutants?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Water pollution is a rising global crisis that directly affects health, economic development<br>\nand food security (FAO, 2021b). Agriculture is a leading source of water pollution due to fertiliser and<br>\npesticide runoff (FAO, 2023a). Given their significant role in contributing to this crisis, companies have<br>\na responsibility to implement more effective and transparent wastewater treatment and pollution<br>\ncontrol measures.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must report data on its discharge of water pollutants. Examples of water pollutants that companies could report on include: <br>\nBiochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)<br>\nChemical Oxygen Demand (COD)<br>\nTotal Suspended Solids (TSS)<br>\nheavy metals (e.g. mercury, lead, zinc)<br>\nVolatile Organic Chemicals (VOCs) (e.g. solvents, pesticides, synthetics)<br>\nPhosphorus<br>\nNitrogen<br>\nPesticides<br>\n<br>\nReporting must cover the company‚s entire operations. Datapoint must be from the most recent reporting period. Intensity metrics are not accepted",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Water_Pollutant_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136533,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Water Pollutant Reduction Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Water_Pollutant_Reduction_Target.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Water Pollutant Reduction Target",
      "question": "Does the company set a target to reduce its water pollutants?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Water pollution is a rising global crisis that directly affects health, economic development<br>\nand food security (FAO, 2021b). Agriculture is a leading source of water pollution due to fertiliser and<br>\npesticide runoff (FAO, 2023a). Given their significant role in contributing to this crisis, companies have<br>\na responsibility to implement more effective and transparent wastewater treatment and pollution<br>\ncontrol measures.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must have a quantitative target to reduce its water pollutantsor at least one of its most material pollutants.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Water_Pollutant_Reduction_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136549,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Water Pollutant Reduction Progress",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Water_Pollutant_Reduction_Progress.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Water Pollutant Reduction Progress",
      "question": "Does the company report progress on reducing its water pollutants?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Water pollution is a rising global crisis that directly affects health, economic development<br>\nand food security (FAO, 2021b). Agriculture is a leading source of water pollution due to fertiliser and<br>\npesticide runoff (FAO, 2023a). Given their significant role in contributing to this crisis, companies have<br>\na responsibility to implement more effective and transparent wastewater treatment and pollution<br>\ncontrol measures.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must either report progress against targets or show absolute, year-on-year reductions for three consecutive years for all pollutants disclosed in element (a). Any increases in any pollutants would be Unmet.<br>\n<br>\nProgress against a target is only accepted if the target is timebound and measurable as specified in the requirements in element (b).",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Water_Pollutant_Reduction_Progress+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136570,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Societal Impact in Water Pollution Risk Assessment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Societal_Impact_in_Water_Pollution_Risk_Assessment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Societal Impact in Water Pollution Risk Assessment",
      "question": "Does the company identify societal impacts in its water pollution risk assessment?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Water pollution is a rising global crisis that directly affects health, economic development<br>\nand food security (FAO, 2021b). Agriculture is a leading source of water pollution due to fertiliser and<br>\npesticide runoff (FAO, 2023a). Given their significant role in contributing to this crisis, companies have<br>\na responsibility to implement more effective and transparent wastewater treatment and pollution<br>\ncontrol measures.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must either: <br>\nHave a policy stating that the company has conducted social impact assessments associated with its water use or pollution risks across substantial operations, or<br>\nProvide at least a high-level summary of a social risk or impact assessment for its most material operations or value chain impacts.<br>\n<br>\nEvidence of having conducted a risk or impact assessment for their most material sites can include:<br>\ndisclosing the actual or potential negative impacts stemming from its water use or pollution associated with its operations, products or services, contractual or business relationships, or value chain. <br>\ndisclosing tools, approaches, or external standards followed to conduct the self-assessment, or external audits or inspections they engage in.<br>\ndisclosing affected stakeholders (customers, local communities, tenants, etc.)<br>\ndisclosing frequency, timing, or factors that trigger the company to conduct risk assessments (or reassessment) on water use or pollution (e.g. proposed business activity, in response to or in anticipation of changes in the operating environment, periodically throughout the life of an activity or relationship, etc.)<br>\nExamples of impacts to society that the company can measure include impacts to:<br>\n<br>\nhuman health<br>\nthe wellbeing of local communities<br>\nmarginalized populations, such as Indigenous Peoples <br>\naccess to land or areas<br>\n<br>\nThis is unmet if the company:<br>\nconducts a risk assessment that does not disclose specifically the risks to society<br>\ndiscloses an ongoing assessment, or that one will be conducted in the future",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Societal_Impact_in_Water_Pollution_Risk_Assessment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136586,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Food Loss and Waste Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Food_Loss_and_Waste_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Food Loss and Waste Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report on its food loss and waste?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "In 2022, the world wasted 1.05 billion tonnes of food at the retail, food service and<br>\nhousehold level. This is in addition to the 13% of the world’s food lost in the supply chain, as<br>\nestimated by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), post-harvest up to and excluding retail.<br>\nMoreover, food loss and waste generates 8-10% of global greenhouse gas emissions and takes up the<br>\nequivalent of nearly 30% of the world’s agricultural land (UNEP 2024). This level of inefficiency also<br>\nhas significant social impacts, such as increasing food insecurity. Investing in efforts to reduce food<br>\nloss and waste can ease the food system’s pressure on the environment, help mitigate climate change<br>\nand increase food availability. At the same time, it can boost economic benefits for companies,<br>\nfarmers and households (Champions 12.3, 2022).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nWe adopt the WRAP Roadmap‚s definition of FLW, which excludes any material that is sent for: Redistribution to people (e.g. through a charity or commercial redistributor); Animal feed; Bio-based materials / biochemical processing (e.g. feedstock for other industrial products). Reporting on inedible FLW is only accepted when edible FLW is also reported.<br>\n<br>\nAs per the FLW Protocol‚s Accounting Standard, the company must report on four dimensions of FLW:<br>\n\tThe total weight of food loss and/or waste (metric tons) <strong>OR</strong> food loss and/or waste as a proportion of total food produced/ handled (%)<br>\n\tDestination (see eligible list of destinations in Definitions tab, WRAP Roadmap guidance here. This should also include volumes / % of FLW per destination)<br>\n\tTimeframe (reporting period, including start and end date)<br>\n\tScope/ Boundary (food category, lifecycle stage, geography, organisation). See FLW Protocol Table 2 p. 9 or WRAP Reporting Template<br>\n<br>\nTwo exceptions are made from the FLW Protocol‚s Accounting guidance:<br>\n<br>\n1\\.\tMaterial type: We deviate from the FLW Standard and instead follow the WRAP Roadmap: Reporting on inedible components of FLW are only accepted if edible FLW is also reported. Therefore, we follow WRAP‚s definition for FLW, which excludes any material that is redistributed to people, used as animal feed, or used for bio-based materials or biochemical processing (e.g. feedstock for other industrial products  see the WRAP Roadmap Definitions tab for more information.<br>\n2\\.\tDestination: We also follow the WRAP Roadmap‚s list of destinations. Unlike the FLW Standard, this list does not include animal feed or bio-based materials or biochemical processing, although these may be reported as long as categories in the eligible list of destinations are also reported.<br>\n<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is not applicable to agricultural inputs companies.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Food_Loss_and_Waste_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136602,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Food Loss and Waste 50% Reduction Target by 2030",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Food_Loss_and_Waste_50_Reduction_Target_by_2030.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Food Loss and Waste 50% Reduction Target by 2030",
      "question": "Does the company set a target to reduce food loss and waste by 50% by 2030 in alignment with SDG 12.3?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "In 2022, the world wasted 1.05 billion tonnes of food at the retail, food service and<br>\nhousehold level. This is in addition to the 13% of the world’s food lost in the supply chain, as<br>\nestimated by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), post-harvest up to and excluding retail.<br>\nMoreover, food loss and waste generates 8-10% of global greenhouse gas emissions and takes up the<br>\nequivalent of nearly 30% of the world’s agricultural land (UNEP 2024). This level of inefficiency also<br>\nhas significant social impacts, such as increasing food insecurity. Investing in efforts to reduce food<br>\nloss and waste can ease the food system’s pressure on the environment, help mitigate climate change<br>\nand increase food availability. At the same time, it can boost economic benefits for companies,<br>\nfarmers and households (Champions 12.3, 2022).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company‚s target must aim for at least 50% absolute reduction in generated food loss and waste by 2030, in alignment with the SDG 12.3 goal. The company does not need to explicitly refer to SDG 12.3.<br>\n        Targets must be related to FLW generation  targets related to waste destination (e.g. FLW diversion from landfill) are not accepted.<br>\n        A baseline value <strong>OR</strong> year is required.<br>\n        The target should cover the company‚s entire operations at a minimum. It may also cover supply chains.<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is not applicable to agricultural inputs companies.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Food_Loss_and_Waste_50_Reduction_Target_by_2030+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136618,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Food Loss and Waste Reduction Progress",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Food_Loss_and_Waste_Reduction_Progress.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Food Loss and Waste Reduction Progress",
      "question": "Does the company report progress on reducing food loss and waste?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "In 2022, the world wasted 1.05 billion tonnes of food at the retail, food service and<br>\nhousehold level. This is in addition to the 13% of the world’s food lost in the supply chain, as<br>\nestimated by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), post-harvest up to and excluding retail.<br>\nMoreover, food loss and waste generates 8-10% of global greenhouse gas emissions and takes up the<br>\nequivalent of nearly 30% of the world’s agricultural land (UNEP 2024). This level of inefficiency also<br>\nhas significant social impacts, such as increasing food insecurity. Investing in efforts to reduce food<br>\nloss and waste can ease the food system’s pressure on the environment, help mitigate climate change<br>\nand increase food availability. At the same time, it can boost economic benefits for companies,<br>\nfarmers and households (Champions 12.3, 2022).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company reports monotonic, quantitative reductions in food loss and waste over the previous three reporting years. They do not need a target to meet this element.<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is not applicable to agricultural inputs companies.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Food_Loss_and_Waste_Reduction_Progress+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136639,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Value Chain Food Loss and Waste Prevention",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Value_Chain_Food_Loss_and_Waste_Prevention.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Value Chain Food Loss and Waste Prevention",
      "question": "Does the company work across its value chain to prevent food loss and waste?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "In 2022, the world wasted 1.05 billion tonnes of food at the retail, food service and<br>\nhousehold level. This is in addition to the 13% of the world’s food lost in the supply chain, as<br>\nestimated by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), post-harvest up to and excluding retail.<br>\nMoreover, food loss and waste generates 8-10% of global greenhouse gas emissions and takes up the<br>\nequivalent of nearly 30% of the world’s agricultural land (UNEP 2024). This level of inefficiency also<br>\nhas significant social impacts, such as increasing food insecurity. Investing in efforts to reduce food<br>\nloss and waste can ease the food system’s pressure on the environment, help mitigate climate change<br>\nand increase food availability. At the same time, it can boost economic benefits for companies,<br>\nfarmers and households (Champions 12.3, 2022).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must report detailed evidence of investments, activities, or partnerships/agreements with suppliers (with financial and training support if needed) or other value chain partners (e.g other companies, consumers, farmers). The company must clearly state that the objective is the reduction of food loss and waste.<br>\n<br>\nInitiatives may include:<br>\n\tStorage measures: cold storage facilities, improved storage technologies and investments<br>\n\tAdjusting cosmetic specifications or other requirements that are contributing to loss and waste by suppliers<br>\n\tNot cancelling orders<br>\n\tClose collaboration to align forecasting and demand planning considering the inherent uncertainty of weather patterns impacting crop availability<br>\n\tImprovement in distribution and logistics<br>\n\timprovement in processing and packaging<br>\n\timproved food monitoring and technologies to track and reduce supply chain inefficiencies<br>\n\tMembership to 10X20x30 (time-bound commitment is embedded)<br>\n\tUsing food by-products to produce food ingredients<br>\n<br>\nDisclosure about diversion, donation, repurposing, reutilising, or raising consumer awareness is not acceptable unless it is reported **alongside** upstream initiatives to reduce FLW generated (such as those listed above).<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is not applicable to agricultural inputs companies.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Value_Chain_Food_Loss_and_Waste_Prevention+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136660,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Plastic Use Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Plastic_Use_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Plastic Use Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report on its plastic use?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Since the 1980s, plastic pollution has increased tenfold (IPBES, 2019). Projections indicate<br>\nthat global plastic production will double by 2050, with approximately 8 million tonnes entering<br>\nmarine environments annually (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). Notably,<br>\naround 50% of all plastic produced is designed for single-use purposes, contributing significantly to<br>\nthis escalating issue. There is an urgent need for companies to adopt and disclose comprehensive<br>\nplastic management strategies to reduce their plastic use.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must report on:<br>\nTotal weight of plastic usage, and<br>\n% of renewable or recycled plastic, such as: the % of virgin fossil-based content, the % of renewable content (from renewable biological sources), or the % of recycled content.<br>\nAdditionally, companies that produce plastics must also report on plastic production. <br>\n<br>\nIf the company does not report on its total weight of plastic used, it must at the very least report on the most material uses of plastic. If the company is not explicit about what its most material uses of plastic are, use the attached table for reference.<br>\n<br>\nThe company must report on categories classified as Moderate **and** High materiality for the industry, based on the [CDP Plastics Sector Guidance](https://cdn.cdp.net/cdp-production/comfy/cms/files/files/000/009/314/original/CDP_Plastics_sector_relevance_2024.pdf).<br>\n<br>\nIn the case of industries for which both categories are classified of Low materiality, they must report on either of them. If a company does not report on plastic use but explicitly states it does not use plastic in their products or packaging, they may get a Met for this element. This will be analysed on a case-by-case basis.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Plastic_Use_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136681,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Plastic Use Reduction Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Plastic_Use_Reduction_Target.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Plastic Use Reduction Target",
      "question": "Does the company set a target to reduce its plastic use?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Since the 1980s, plastic pollution has increased tenfold (IPBES, 2019). Projections indicate<br>\nthat global plastic production will double by 2050, with approximately 8 million tonnes entering<br>\nmarine environments annually (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). Notably,<br>\naround 50% of all plastic produced is designed for single-use purposes, contributing significantly to<br>\nthis escalating issue. There is an urgent need for companies to adopt and disclose comprehensive<br>\nplastic management strategies to reduce their plastic use.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nEligible targets companies could set include:<br>\nReduce the total weight of virgin content in plastic polymers produced and/or sold<br>\nIncrease the proportion of post-consumer recycled content in plastic polymers produced and/or sold<br>\nReduce the total weight of plastic packaging used and/or produced<br>\nEliminate single-use plastic packaging<br>\nReduce the total weight of virgin content in plastic packaging<br>\nIncrease the proportion of post-consumer recycled content in plastic packaging<br>\nIncrease the proportion of plastic packaging that is recyclable/reusable in practice and at scale<br>\nEliminate single-use plastic products<br>\nReduce the total weight of plastics or of virgin content in goods/products<br>\nIncrease the proportion of plastic goods/products which are recyclable/reusable in practice and at scale<br>\nIncrease the proportion of post-consumer recycled content in plastic goods/products<br>\n<br>\nTargets must be timebound, with a defined baseline value and year, and include clear, quantitative, and measurable metrics. They should focus on short-term progress up to 2030, with any longer-term goals broken down into interim targets no more than five years apart. Intensity targets are not accepted unless stated otherwise, as they do not ensure absolute improvements. Year-on-year targets and qualitative targets may be accepted on a case-by-case basis, depending on their ambition and measurability. Any changes to targets or their underlying assumptions must be explained, particularly in terms of impact on comparability. Additionally, targets aimed solely at maintaining current performance are not accepted.<br>\n<br>\nThis is unmet if:<br>\nTargets are for a subset of products<br>\nTargets increase the % of biodegradeable and compostable plastics",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Plastic_Use_Reduction_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136697,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Plastic Use Reduction Progress",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Plastic_Use_Reduction_Progress.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Plastic Use Reduction Progress",
      "question": "Does the company report progress on reducing its plastic use?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Since the 1980s, plastic pollution has increased tenfold (IPBES, 2019). Projections indicate<br>\nthat global plastic production will double by 2050, with approximately 8 million tonnes entering<br>\nmarine environments annually (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). Notably,<br>\naround 50% of all plastic produced is designed for single-use purposes, contributing significantly to<br>\nthis escalating issue. There is an urgent need for companies to adopt and disclose comprehensive<br>\nplastic management strategies to reduce their plastic use.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nCompanies must either:<br>\n<br>\nDisclose progress against the targets in element (b); only accepted if the target is timebound and measurable as specified by the requirements in element (b), or:<br>\nIf there is no target, the company must disclose three years in a row with continuous, absolute improvements on the topics assessed in element (a).<br>\n<br>\nAligned with element (a) this is unmet if the progress:<br>\nAre based on financial metrics (e.g. sales)<br>\nOnly include single product lines, or only regarding part of its operations (e.g. specific sites)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Plastic_Use_Reduction_Progress+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136713,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Single-Use Plastic Elimination",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Single_Use_Plastic_Elimination.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Single-Use Plastic Elimination",
      "question": "Does the company avoid the use of single-use plastics?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Since the 1980s, plastic pollution has increased tenfold (IPBES, 2019). Projections indicate<br>\nthat global plastic production will double by 2050, with approximately 8 million tonnes entering<br>\nmarine environments annually (UNEP, BRS Conventions and Minamata Convention, 2021). Notably,<br>\naround 50% of all plastic produced is designed for single-use purposes, contributing significantly to<br>\nthis escalating issue. There is an urgent need for companies to adopt and disclose comprehensive<br>\nplastic management strategies to reduce their plastic use.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company reports that it uses no single-use plastics, or has disclosed a target to achieve this by 2030.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Single_Use_Plastic_Elimination+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136729,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nutrition_Sensitive_Agriculture_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report on its nutrition-sensitive agriculture activities that contribute to improving the nutritional quality of crops and foods?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Effectively addressing the causes of malnutrition requires interventions across the food<br>\nsystem. Making agriculture and food systems nutrition sensitive1F1F1F<br>\n2 is important to ensure the<br>\nproduction of a variety of affordable, nutritious, culturally appropriate and safe foods of an adequate<br>\nquantity and quality to meet the dietary requirements of populations in a sustainable manner (FAO,<br>\n2019). Nutrition-sensitive interventions are actions taken across sectors that may not have nutrition as<br>\nthe predominant goal but are aimed at addressing the underlying determinants of nutrition. Examples<br>\ninclude biofortification and crop diversification, which enhance the production and variety of more<br>\nnutrient-dense crops (FAO, 2017). Nutrition-sensitive agriculture is regarded as an effective approach<br>\nto transition towards sustainable food systems and healthy diets (Di Prima et. Al, 2022) and companies<br>\nshould demonstrate their efforts in this area.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must<br>\n\tclearly state that the objective is to improve nutrition and or diets, or address malnutrition. It is enough if the company mentions addressing any of these issues in its sustainability disclosure, framework or materiality assessments<br>\n\tdiscloses a description of business activities implemented which cover at minimum one crop (such as rice, wheat, maize, sorghum, vegetables, pulses, indigenous crops better adapted to local conditions) or food product, and one country/geography.<br>\n<br>\nExamples of activities per industry:<br>\n\tFertilisers: mineral fertilisers to address micronutrient deficiencies (zinc, iron, iodine, etc.), use of fertilisers/plant nutrition to improve the nutrient content of crops and/or support crop diversification<br>\n\tSeeds and agrochemicals: biofortification of staple crops, diversification strategies (to increase fruit and vegetables, legumes to increase local/indigenous crops and diversify, activities linked to improving and supporting plant-based diets<br>\n\tGrains and oilseed: crop diversification, fortification, logistics and post-harvest techniques to reduce losses and maintain safety. Collaborations with customers to reduce trans-fats<br>\n\tAnimal feed: use of by-products for animal feed.<br>\nIt is not sufficient if the company only mentions improvement in yields and productivity<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable to companies operating primarily in the upstream value chain segments, comprising agricultural inputs and agricultural products and commodities.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nutrition_Sensitive_Agriculture_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136750,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Nutrition-Sensitive Activity Quantitative Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nutrition_Sensitive_Activity_Quantitative_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Nutrition-Sensitive Activity Quantitative Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report quantitative data on its nutrition-sensitive activities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Effectively addressing the causes of malnutrition requires interventions across the food<br>\nsystem. Making agriculture and food systems nutrition sensitive1F1F1F<br>\n2 is important to ensure the<br>\nproduction of a variety of affordable, nutritious, culturally appropriate and safe foods of an adequate<br>\nquantity and quality to meet the dietary requirements of populations in a sustainable manner (FAO,<br>\n2019). Nutrition-sensitive interventions are actions taken across sectors that may not have nutrition as<br>\nthe predominant goal but are aimed at addressing the underlying determinants of nutrition. Examples<br>\ninclude biofortification and crop diversification, which enhance the production and variety of more<br>\nnutrient-dense crops (FAO, 2017). Nutrition-sensitive agriculture is regarded as an effective approach<br>\nto transition towards sustainable food systems and healthy diets (Di Prima et. Al, 2022) and companies<br>\nshould demonstrate their efforts in this area.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company provides metrics linked to nutrition outcome. Examples of metrics can be linked to:<br>\n\tScale (e.g. number of people reached with fortified/nutrient-dense crops/foods, hectares of biofortified/diversified/ nutrient-dense crops)<br>\n\tYields of nutrient-dense crops<br>\n\tPercentage of (bio)fortified crops/foods<br>\n\tIncreased diversity of crops grown<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable to companies operating primarily in the upstream value chain segments, comprising agricultural inputs and agricultural products and commodities.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nutrition_Sensitive_Activity_Quantitative_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136766,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture Target Setting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nutrition_Sensitive_Agriculture_Target_Setting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture Target Setting",
      "question": "Does the company set a target to implement nutrition-sensitive agriculture activities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Effectively addressing the causes of malnutrition requires interventions across the food<br>\nsystem. Making agriculture and food systems nutrition sensitive1F1F1F<br>\n2 is important to ensure the<br>\nproduction of a variety of affordable, nutritious, culturally appropriate and safe foods of an adequate<br>\nquantity and quality to meet the dietary requirements of populations in a sustainable manner (FAO,<br>\n2019). Nutrition-sensitive interventions are actions taken across sectors that may not have nutrition as<br>\nthe predominant goal but are aimed at addressing the underlying determinants of nutrition. Examples<br>\ninclude biofortification and crop diversification, which enhance the production and variety of more<br>\nnutrient-dense crops (FAO, 2017). Nutrition-sensitive agriculture is regarded as an effective approach<br>\nto transition towards sustainable food systems and healthy diets (Di Prima et. Al, 2022) and companies<br>\nshould demonstrate their efforts in this area.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\n The company has set a time-bound target in relation to nutrition-sensitive agriculture activities (see element a and b)<br>\n <br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable to companies operating primarily in the upstream value chain segments, comprising agricultural inputs and agricultural products and commodities.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nutrition_Sensitive_Agriculture_Target_Setting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136782,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Nutrition-Sensitive Activity Progress Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nutrition_Sensitive_Activity_Progress_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Nutrition-Sensitive Activity Progress Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report progress on its nutrition-sensitive activities?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Effectively addressing the causes of malnutrition requires interventions across the food<br>\nsystem. Making agriculture and food systems nutrition sensitive1F1F1F<br>\n2 is important to ensure the<br>\nproduction of a variety of affordable, nutritious, culturally appropriate and safe foods of an adequate<br>\nquantity and quality to meet the dietary requirements of populations in a sustainable manner (FAO,<br>\n2019). Nutrition-sensitive interventions are actions taken across sectors that may not have nutrition as<br>\nthe predominant goal but are aimed at addressing the underlying determinants of nutrition. Examples<br>\ninclude biofortification and crop diversification, which enhance the production and variety of more<br>\nnutrient-dense crops (FAO, 2017). Nutrition-sensitive agriculture is regarded as an effective approach<br>\nto transition towards sustainable food systems and healthy diets (Di Prima et. Al, 2022) and companies<br>\nshould demonstrate their efforts in this area.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company reports quantitative progress on its activities.The latest reporting should be not older than two years/reporting periods<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable to companies operating primarily in the upstream value chain segments, comprising agricultural inputs and agricultural products and commodities.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nutrition_Sensitive_Activity_Progress_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136798,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Portfolio Nutritional Quality Improvement Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Portfolio_Nutritional_Quality_Improvement_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Portfolio Nutritional Quality Improvement Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report on improving the nutritional quality of its portfolio?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Almost a third of the world’s population, 2.3 billion people, faced moderate or severe food<br>\ninsecurity in 2021, up from 25% before the Covid-19 pandemic. At the same time, what we eat across<br>\nthe world continues to fall short of the minimum standards for healthy and sustainable diets,<br>\ncontributing to a marked rise in obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases (NCDs): around<br>\n40% of all adults and 20% of all children are now overweight or obese (GNR, 2022). By improving the<br>\nnutritional quality of their portfolio, food companies can play a crucial role in helping transform our<br>\nfood system and enabling access to healthy, affordable and sustainably produced food (GNR, 2022).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nBased on its portfolio, the company reports on at least two of the following: reduction of salt/sodium, sugar, fat, portion size, level of processing, addressing micronutrient deficiencies.<br>\nThe reporting should cover 2 years.<br>\n<br>\nTypes of accepted time-bound targets and reporting:<br>\nSalt/sodium<br>\n\tpercentage reduction of salt/sodium/ across product category/portfolio <br>\n\tpercentage of products meeting national, or in the absence of national targets the WHO global sodium benchmarks, for sodium content in all relevant products.<br>\n\tTarget to increase percentage of products meeting WHO sodium<br>\nFat<br>\n\tpercentage reduction saturated fat across product category/portfolio <br>\n\tpercentage of products that have achieved a reduction in saturated fats<br>\n\tPhase out or time-bound target to eliminate iTFA across all products categories<br>\n\tTarget to reduce levels of saturated fats across product categories/portfolio<br>\nSugar<br>\n\tpercentage reduction of free/total sugar across product category/portfolio <br>\n\tpercentage of products that have achieved a reduction in free/total sugar<br>\n\tTarget to reduce levels of free/total sugars across product categories/portfolio<br>\nPortion size<br>\n\tpercentage of products from single serve products or smaller packages or menu items that offer smaller package sizes, compared with larger package sizes, in relevant categories<br>\nLevel of processing<br>\n\tpercentage reduction in ultra-processed foods<br>\n\tpercentage increase in unprocessed or minimally processed foods<br>\nPremixes, supplements to address micronutrient deficiencies (vitamins, minerals)<br>\n\tReach of these products in low- and middle-income countries<br>\n\tEvidence can be about fortification of edible oils<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable to companies operating primarily in the downstream value chain segments, comprising food and beverage manufacturers and processors, food retailers and restaurants and food services.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Portfolio_Nutritional_Quality_Improvement_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136819,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Nutrient Profile Model Usage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nutrient_Profile_Model_Usage.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Nutrient Profile Model Usage",
      "question": "Does the company use a nutrient profile model to assess the nutritional quality of its portfolio?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Almost a third of the world’s population, 2.3 billion people, faced moderate or severe food<br>\ninsecurity in 2021, up from 25% before the Covid-19 pandemic. At the same time, what we eat across<br>\nthe world continues to fall short of the minimum standards for healthy and sustainable diets,<br>\ncontributing to a marked rise in obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases (NCDs): around<br>\n40% of all adults and 20% of all children are now overweight or obese (GNR, 2022). By improving the<br>\nnutritional quality of their portfolio, food companies can play a crucial role in helping transform our<br>\nfood system and enabling access to healthy, affordable and sustainably produced food (GNR, 2022).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must disclose that it has:<br>\n\tbenchmarked its definition of healthier‚ against at least one government-endorsed NPM <br>\n<strong>OR</strong><br>\n\tIt uses the NPM for reporting purposes<br>\n<br>\nList of accepted NPM:<br>\n\tHealth Star Rating System<br>\n\tNutri-score<br>\n\tUK Traffic Lights<br>\n\tWHO regional nutrient profile models to identify unhealthy foods and beverages. (EURO, EMRO, WPRO, SEARO, PAHO, AFRO)<br>\n\tFull list here<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable to companies operating primarily in the downstream value chain segments, comprising food and beverage manufacturers and processors, food retailers and restaurants and food services.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nutrient_Profile_Model_Usage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136840,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Nutritious Product Portfolio Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nutritious_Product_Portfolio_Target.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Nutritious Product Portfolio Target",
      "question": "Does the company set a target to increase the proportion of nutritious products/menus it offers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Almost a third of the world’s population, 2.3 billion people, faced moderate or severe food<br>\ninsecurity in 2021, up from 25% before the Covid-19 pandemic. At the same time, what we eat across<br>\nthe world continues to fall short of the minimum standards for healthy and sustainable diets,<br>\ncontributing to a marked rise in obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases (NCDs): around<br>\n40% of all adults and 20% of all children are now overweight or obese (GNR, 2022). By improving the<br>\nnutritional quality of their portfolio, food companies can play a crucial role in helping transform our<br>\nfood system and enabling access to healthy, affordable and sustainably produced food (GNR, 2022).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\n\tNutritious foods: products defined healthy‚ in accordance with a government-endorsed/widely recognised nutrient profiling or (minimally processed) fruit and vegetables, legumes<br>\n\tThe target must be sales-based<br>\n<br>\nThe target can be about:<br>\n\tIncreasing the proportion of products meeting certain NPM score (e.g. 3.5 with Health Star Rating, Score A,B,C Nutri-score, etc)<br>\n\tIncreasing the proportion of (minimally processed) fruit and vegetables. (Food retailers)<br>\n<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable to companies operating primarily in the downstream value chain segments, comprising food and beverage manufacturers and processors, food retailers and restaurants and food services.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nutritious_Product_Portfolio_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136856,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Nutritious Product Portfolio Progress",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nutritious_Product_Portfolio_Progress.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Nutritious Product Portfolio Progress",
      "question": "Does the company report its progress on increasing the proportion of nutritious products/menus it offers?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Almost a third of the world’s population, 2.3 billion people, faced moderate or severe food<br>\ninsecurity in 2021, up from 25% before the Covid-19 pandemic. At the same time, what we eat across<br>\nthe world continues to fall short of the minimum standards for healthy and sustainable diets,<br>\ncontributing to a marked rise in obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases (NCDs): around<br>\n40% of all adults and 20% of all children are now overweight or obese (GNR, 2022). By improving the<br>\nnutritional quality of their portfolio, food companies can play a crucial role in helping transform our<br>\nfood system and enabling access to healthy, affordable and sustainably produced food (GNR, 2022).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company reports increase in the proportion of nutritious foods. The latest reporting should be not older than two years/reporting periods.<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable to companies operating primarily in the downstream value chain segments, comprising food and beverage manufacturers and processors, food retailers and restaurants and food services.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Nutritious_Product_Portfolio_Progress+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136877,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Plant-Based and Alternative Protein Portfolio Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Plant_Based_and_Alternative_Protein_Portfolio_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Plant-Based and Alternative Protein Portfolio Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report the proportion of plant-based and/or alternative proteins within its portfolio?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The animal protein sector is a significant contributor to climate change (Xu et al., 2021).<br>\nResearch has shown that simply improving dairy and meat production practices will be insufficient; a<br>\nshift in consumption patterns is required (IPCC, 2019). Companies have a crucial role to play in<br>\ndelivering nutritious diets that respect and stay within planetary boundaries. To this end, they need to<br>\ndemonstrate how they are increasing the diversity and share of plant-based products in their<br>\nportfolios (WBCSD, 2024).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company should report data on the proportion of plant based and/or alternative vs animal-based proteins in its portfolio.<br>\nAbsolute values (e.g. number of products sold/procured etc) are not accepted.<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable only to companies with animal proteins as a part of their operations or supply chain.<br>\n<br>\nDEFINITIONS<br>\nPlant based proteinsinclude products made by conventional fermentation (e.g., tofu or tempeh), as well as plant-based whole food proteins and fats such as legumes, pulses, wholegrains, nuts.<br>\nAlternative proteinsinclude analogues that directly substitute animal-derived products (e.g., meat or dairy) or ingredients (e.g., fat or whey protein) using precision or biomass fermentation, cultivated, or hybrid food technologies.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Plant_Based_and_Alternative_Protein_Portfolio_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136893,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Plant-Based and Alternative Protein Target",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Plant_Based_and_Alternative_Protein_Target.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Plant-Based and Alternative Protein Target",
      "question": "Does the company set a target to increase the proportion of plant-based and/or alternative proteins across its portfolio?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The animal protein sector is a significant contributor to climate change (Xu et al., 2021).<br>\nResearch has shown that simply improving dairy and meat production practices will be insufficient; a<br>\nshift in consumption patterns is required (IPCC, 2019). Companies have a crucial role to play in<br>\ndelivering nutritious diets that respect and stay within planetary boundaries. To this end, they need to<br>\ndemonstrate how they are increasing the diversity and share of plant-based products in their<br>\nportfolios (WBCSD, 2024).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nTargets should specifically relate to increasing proportions in its portfolio, or through procurement/sourcing. Targets related to absolute amounts (tonnes sold or volume sales) are not accepted. <br>\nTargets could include:<br>\n\tincreasing proportion of average baskets that are plant based/alternative proteins (retailers)<br>\n\tincreasing percentage of products or sales (within a specific brand or category) that are plant based/alternative proteins proteins<br>\n\tincreasing percentage of protein sourced/procured that are plant based/alternative proteins.<br>\n\tincreasing percentage of menus that are composed of plant based/alternative proteins proteins.<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable only to companies with animal proteins as a part of their operations or supply chain.<br>\n<br>\nDEFINITIONS<br>\nPlant based proteinsinclude products made by conventional fermentation (e.g., tofu or tempeh), as well as plant-based whole food proteins and fats such as legumes, pulses, wholegrains, nuts.<br>\nAlternative proteinsinclude analogues that directly substitute animal-derived products (e.g., meat or dairy) or ingredients (e.g., fat or whey protein) using precision or biomass fermentation, cultivated, or hybrid food technologies.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Plant_Based_and_Alternative_Protein_Target+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136909,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Plant-Based and Alternative Protein Progress",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Plant_Based_and_Alternative_Protein_Progress.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Plant-Based and Alternative Protein Progress",
      "question": "Does the company report its progress on increasing the proportion of plant-based and/or alternative proteins in its portfolio?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The animal protein sector is a significant contributor to climate change (Xu et al., 2021).<br>\nResearch has shown that simply improving dairy and meat production practices will be insufficient; a<br>\nshift in consumption patterns is required (IPCC, 2019). Companies have a crucial role to play in<br>\ndelivering nutritious diets that respect and stay within planetary boundaries. To this end, they need to<br>\ndemonstrate how they are increasing the diversity and share of plant-based products in their<br>\nportfolios (WBCSD, 2024).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThis indicator is applicable only to companies with animal proteins as a part of their operations or supply chain.<br>\n<br>\nDEFINITIONS<br>\nPlant based proteinsinclude products made by conventional fermentation (e.g., tofu or tempeh), as well as plant-based whole food proteins and fats such as legumes, pulses, wholegrains, nuts.<br>\nAlternative proteinsinclude analogues that directly substitute animal-derived products (e.g., meat or dairy) or ingredients (e.g., fat or whey protein) using precision or biomass fermentation, cultivated, or hybrid food technologies.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Plant_Based_and_Alternative_Protein_Progress+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136930,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Plant-Based and Alternative Protein Advancement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Plant_Based_and_Alternative_Protein_Advancement.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Plant-Based and Alternative Protein Advancement",
      "question": "Does the company advance the production or promote the consumption of plant-based and/or alternative proteins?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "The animal protein sector is a significant contributor to climate change (Xu et al., 2021).<br>\nResearch has shown that simply improving dairy and meat production practices will be insufficient; a<br>\nshift in consumption patterns is required (IPCC, 2019). Companies have a crucial role to play in<br>\ndelivering nutritious diets that respect and stay within planetary boundaries. To this end, they need to<br>\ndemonstrate how they are increasing the diversity and share of plant-based products in their<br>\nportfolios (WBCSD, 2024).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\n\tFor retailers, restaurants and food service: This element includes strategies to promote plant based/alternative proteins, including pricing strategies, choice architecture strategies, having defined marketing/merchandising campaigns etc.<br>\n\tFor animal proteins manufacturers: This element includes strategies to advance the plant based/alternative protein sector, including investment into R&D, establishing/engaging in partnerships to innovate etc.<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable only to companies with animal proteins as a part of their operations or supply chain.<br>\nDEFINITIONS<br>\nPlant based proteinsinclude products made by conventional fermentation (e.g., tofu or tempeh), as well as plant-based whole food proteins and fats such as legumes, pulses, wholegrains, nuts.<br>\nAlternative proteinsinclude analogues that directly substitute animal-derived products (e.g., meat or dairy) or ingredients (e.g., fat or whey protein) using precision or biomass fermentation, cultivated, or hybrid food technologies.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Plant_Based_and_Alternative_Protein_Advancement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136946,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Unhealthy Product Marketing Policy (Under 18)",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Unhealthy_Product_Marketing_Policy_Under_18.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Unhealthy Product Marketing Policy (Under 18)",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a policy of not marketing unhealthy products to anyone below the age of 18?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Food marketing is pervasive and persuasive, and food and beverage companies play a<br>\nsignificant role in shaping children’s food environments. Children around the world are exposed to<br>\nlarge volumes of unhealthy food marketing, with negative consequences for their diets and health.<br>\nNumerous global and regional calls to action to end the harmful impact of food marketing have been<br>\nmade by governments and international agencies alike, including the United Nations Children’s Fund<br>\n(UNICEF) and the World Health Organization (WHO) (UNICEF-WHO, 2023).<br>\nFurther, information about food can influence consumer preferences, purchasing behaviour and<br>\nconsumption patterns (GNR, 2020). Next to following ethical marketing practices, companies should<br>\nprovide clearly visible, accurate and easy-to-understand on-pack food labelling to help consumers make healthier food choices and incentivise food manufacturers and suppliers to deliver more<br>\nnutritious foods (WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2020).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nUnhealthy products: products high fat, sugar, salt (HFSS) and associated brands<br>\n<br>\nThe policy and marketing restrictions must cover<br>\n\tall children below age 18<br>\n\tPrint media (newspapers, magazines, books), broadcast media (TV, radio), online (company-owned and third-party websites and platforms), social media, apps (company/brand accounts)<br>\n\tPrimary and secondary schools and proximity<br>\n\tCelebrities, influencers, and other people with strong appeal to children (e.g. sport celebrities).<br>\n\tPaid ads on third-party websites, social media, and apps<br>\n\tIn-store and point-of-sale marketing (on-shelf, checkout, and end-of-shelf displays; vending machines; special offers/incentives/points schemes)<br>\n\tPackaging design with strong appeal to children (colors, graphics, fonts, characters, etc)<br>\n\tProduct placements across all media (movies, TV shows, online series, computer games, etc)<br>\n\tCinema<br>\n\tSponsorship of sport, cultural events/activities frequented by children<br>\n\tOutdoor (billboards, posters, vehicles, etc)<br>\n\tInfluencers (compensated in-kind)<br>\n\tToys, premiums, vouchers, giveaways<br>\n\tThird-party fantasy and animated/cartoon characters with a strong appeal to children<br>\n\tStreaming platforms (TV, movies. music)<br>\n\tBrand advertising<br>\n\tIn game promotions<br>\n\tUser-generated content campaigns<br>\n\tNative advertising<br>\n\tAll these criteria need to be met without exceptions<br>\nAlcohol companies:<br>\nThe company responsible marketing policy revolves around:<br>\n\tLimit appeal and exposure of alcohol marketing to minors by not using any marketing practice and technique that is likely to be appealing to minor (see list here - Appendix)<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable to companies operating primarily in the downstream value chain segments, comprising food and beverage manufacturers and processors, food retailers and restaurants and food services.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Unhealthy_Product_Marketing_Policy_Under_18+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136962,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+WHO Nutrient Profile Model for Children's Marketing",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+WHO_Nutrient_Profile_Model_for_Children_s_Marketing.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "WHO Nutrient Profile Model for Children's Marketing",
      "question": "Does the company use a WHO regional nutrient profile model to avoid marketing unhealthy products to children?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Food marketing is pervasive and persuasive, and food and beverage companies play a<br>\nsignificant role in shaping children’s food environments. Children around the world are exposed to<br>\nlarge volumes of unhealthy food marketing, with negative consequences for their diets and health.<br>\nNumerous global and regional calls to action to end the harmful impact of food marketing have been<br>\nmade by governments and international agencies alike, including the United Nations Children’s Fund<br>\n(UNICEF) and the World Health Organization (WHO) (UNICEF-WHO, 2023).<br>\nFurther, information about food can influence consumer preferences, purchasing behaviour and<br>\nconsumption patterns (GNR, 2020). Next to following ethical marketing practices, companies should<br>\nprovide clearly visible, accurate and easy-to-understand on-pack food labelling to help consumers make healthier food choices and incentivise food manufacturers and suppliers to deliver more<br>\nnutritious foods (WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2020).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company‚s policy mustuse a government-led nutrient profile model to classify foods to be restricted from marketing.<br>\n<br>\nList of accepted NPM:<br>\n\tHealth Star Rating System<br>\n\tNutri-score<br>\n\tUK Traffic Lights<br>\n\tWHO regional nutrient profile models to identify unhealthy foods and beverages. (EURO, EMRO, WPRO, SEARO, PAHO, AFRO)<br>\n\tFull list here<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable to companies operating primarily in the downstream value chain segments, comprising food and beverage manufacturers and processors, food retailers and restaurants and food services.<br>\nThis element is not applicable to companies producing primarily alcoholic beverages.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+WHO_Nutrient_Profile_Model_for_Children_s_Marketing+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136978,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Marketing Practices Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Marketing_Practices_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Marketing Practices Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report information on its marketing practices?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Food marketing is pervasive and persuasive, and food and beverage companies play a<br>\nsignificant role in shaping children’s food environments. Children around the world are exposed to<br>\nlarge volumes of unhealthy food marketing, with negative consequences for their diets and health.<br>\nNumerous global and regional calls to action to end the harmful impact of food marketing have been<br>\nmade by governments and international agencies alike, including the United Nations Children’s Fund<br>\n(UNICEF) and the World Health Organization (WHO) (UNICEF-WHO, 2023).<br>\nFurther, information about food can influence consumer preferences, purchasing behaviour and<br>\nconsumption patterns (GNR, 2020). Next to following ethical marketing practices, companies should<br>\nprovide clearly visible, accurate and easy-to-understand on-pack food labelling to help consumers make healthier food choices and incentivise food manufacturers and suppliers to deliver more<br>\nnutritious foods (WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2020).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nExamples of reporting:<br>\n\tProportion of marketing spend on healthy and unhealthy products, stratified by media type and by age<br>\n\tProportion of advertising impressions for healthy and unhealthy, stratified by age and media type<br>\n\tDetails (number and value) of sponsorships provided for sporting, cultural or other events/activities that are popular with children and families, using unhealthy brands<br>\n\tNumber of unhealthy products that have elements of package or product design that appeal to children (e.g., cartoon characters, celebrities, competitions)<br>\n<br>\nThe definition of healthy must be linked to government-endorsed NPM<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable to companies operating primarily in the downstream value chain segments, comprising food and beverage manufacturers and processors, food retailers and restaurants and food services.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Marketing_Practices_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24136999,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Front_of_Pack_Nutrition_Labelling_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report on front-of-pack nutrition labelling roll-out across products and geographies?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Food marketing is pervasive and persuasive, and food and beverage companies play a<br>\nsignificant role in shaping children’s food environments. Children around the world are exposed to<br>\nlarge volumes of unhealthy food marketing, with negative consequences for their diets and health.<br>\nNumerous global and regional calls to action to end the harmful impact of food marketing have been<br>\nmade by governments and international agencies alike, including the United Nations Children’s Fund<br>\n(UNICEF) and the World Health Organization (WHO) (UNICEF-WHO, 2023).<br>\nFurther, information about food can influence consumer preferences, purchasing behaviour and<br>\nconsumption patterns (GNR, 2020). Next to following ethical marketing practices, companies should<br>\nprovide clearly visible, accurate and easy-to-understand on-pack food labelling to help consumers make healthier food choices and incentivise food manufacturers and suppliers to deliver more<br>\nnutritious foods (WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2020).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nIf the company operates in markets where voluntary FOPL are available, the company must disclose on:<br>\n\tProportion of eligible products displaying the government-endorsed voluntary Front of pack labelling scheme, by category<br>\n<br>\nIf the company operates in markets where there is no voluntary FOPL (e.g. operating and selling products only in e.g.: China, US, Japan or only Latin American countries with mandatory labelling), it must report on:<br>\n\tNumber of incidents of non-compliance with industry and regulatory labelling codes, and report on actions taken to remediate non-compliance (where applicable)<br>\n<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable to companies operating primarily in the downstream value chain segments, comprising food and beverage manufacturers and processors, food retailers and restaurants and food services.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Front_of_Pack_Nutrition_Labelling_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137015,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Workplace Breastfeeding Support Policy",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workplace_Breastfeeding_Support_Policy.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Workplace Breastfeeding Support Policy",
      "question": "Does the company disclose a programme/policy for workplace breastfeeding support?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Approximately 58% of the world’s population spends a third of their time at work during<br>\ntheir adult life (CGF, n.d.). Companies can promote nutrition at work through a set of interventions,<br>\nincluding access to and supply of healthy foods and breastfeeding support (Workforce Nutrition<br>\nAlliance, 2022). Moreover, they can make their workforce nutrition programmes even more impactful<br>\nby targeting their supply chain workers in low- and middle-income countries, where rates of<br>\nmalnutrition are higher (ATNI, 2021).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must disclose at least one of the following:<br>\n\tA global/group-level parental leave policy that includes maternity leave of at least 14 weeks with at least 2/3 paid;<br>\n\tPrivate, hygienic, safe rooms to express breastmilkAND the company must specify/be clear about where the support has been implemented;<br>\n\tA supporting policy for flexible working time and/or breaks to breastfeed and/or express breastmilk <strong>AND</strong> the company must specify/be clear about where the support has been implemented.<br>\n <br>\nDEFINITIONS<br>\nGAIN Workforce nutrition scorecard<br>\nBreastfeeding support programmes<br>\nWorkplace breastfeeding support includes programmes or company policies which enable working mothers to breastfeed. Such programmes can include: respecting or exceeding national laws on duration of paid maternity leave; providing an appropriate place and time to express/pump milk during work hours and providing options for working mothers such as on-site child care and flexible work schedules. Some programmes include awareness-raising or nutrition education campaigns for mothers and coworkers on the importance of breastfeeding.<br>\nHealthy foods at work<br>\nThese are programmes which focus on increasing employees‚ access to healthy and safe foods at work. Employers may provide healthy food for free, with a subsidy, or at full cost to the employee. These programmes change the food environment through healthier canteen meals (some include promotion alongside options), snack offerings, vending machine options, more balanced portion sizes. All of these shape people‚s access to nutritious foods and encourage healthier choices.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Workplace_Breastfeeding_Support_Policy+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137031,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Employee Healthy Food Programme Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Employee_Healthy_Food_Programme_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Employee Healthy Food Programme Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report on its programmes for providing healthy foods to its employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Approximately 58% of the world’s population spends a third of their time at work during<br>\ntheir adult life (CGF, n.d.). Companies can promote nutrition at work through a set of interventions,<br>\nincluding access to and supply of healthy foods and breastfeeding support (Workforce Nutrition<br>\nAlliance, 2022). Moreover, they can make their workforce nutrition programmes even more impactful<br>\nby targeting their supply chain workers in low- and middle-income countries, where rates of<br>\nmalnutrition are higher (ATNI, 2021).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must disclose a description of the programme, and metrics and scope.<br>\n\tDescription of the programme: for example, free or subsidized healthy foods/meals/snacks\\*, fruit & vegetables, fortified food, balanced meals, clean drinking water offered on-site/canteen/offices, kitchen gardens, vegetable gardens.<br>\n\t The programme must be long-term and not a single intervention<br>\n\tMetrics: for example, number/percentage of healthy foods items made available, the number of occasions that healthy food is made available, the number of workers reached with healthy foods items, the number of workers consuming nutritionally balanced meals<br>\n\tScope: the company discloses the reach of its programme, i.e. how much of its workforce is covered<br>\n<br>\nExamples covering only some locations/countries are accepted, provided that the programme covers all employees in the company‚s location<br>\n\\*Healthy foods: The company can share the Healthy Food checklists in the Workforce Nutrition Guidance or the provide the data from the WNA scorecard Healthy Food at work [guidance for companies]<br>\n <br>\nDEFINITIONS<br>\nGAIN Workforce nutrition scorecard<br>\nBreastfeeding support programmes<br>\nWorkplace breastfeeding support includes programmes or company policies which enable working mothers to breastfeed. Such programmes can include: respecting or exceeding national laws on duration of paid maternity leave; providing an appropriate place and time to express/pump milk during work hours and providing options for working mothers such as on-site child care and flexible work schedules. Some programmes include awareness-raising or nutrition education campaigns for mothers and coworkers on the importance of breastfeeding.<br>\nHealthy foods at work<br>\nThese are programmes which focus on increasing employees‚ access to healthy and safe foods at work. Employers may provide healthy food for free, with a subsidy, or at full cost to the employee. These programmes change the food environment through healthier canteen meals (some include promotion alongside options), snack offerings, vending machine options, more balanced portion sizes. All of these shape people‚s access to nutritious foods and encourage healthier choices.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Employee_Healthy_Food_Programme_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137047,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Employee Healthy Food Programme Progress",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Employee_Healthy_Food_Programme_Progress.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Employee Healthy Food Programme Progress",
      "question": "Does the company report its progress on providing healthy foods to its employees?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Approximately 58% of the world’s population spends a third of their time at work during<br>\ntheir adult life (CGF, n.d.). Companies can promote nutrition at work through a set of interventions,<br>\nincluding access to and supply of healthy foods and breastfeeding support (Workforce Nutrition<br>\nAlliance, 2022). Moreover, they can make their workforce nutrition programmes even more impactful<br>\nby targeting their supply chain workers in low- and middle-income countries, where rates of<br>\nmalnutrition are higher (ATNI, 2021).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company reports quantitative metrics on healthy food offerings <strong>AND</strong> the data reported must be comparable and demonstrate improvements for at least two reporting periods. The last reporting should not be older than two years.<br>\nExamples covering only some locations/countries are accepted, provided the example cover ALL employees in the company‚s location.<br>\n <br>\nDEFINITIONS<br>\nGAIN Workforce nutrition scorecard<br>\nBreastfeeding support programmes<br>\nWorkplace breastfeeding support includes programmes or company policies which enable working mothers to breastfeed. Such programmes can include: respecting or exceeding national laws on duration of paid maternity leave; providing an appropriate place and time to express/pump milk during work hours and providing options for working mothers such as on-site child care and flexible work schedules. Some programmes include awareness-raising or nutrition education campaigns for mothers and coworkers on the importance of breastfeeding.<br>\nHealthy foods at work<br>\nThese are programmes which focus on increasing employees‚ access to healthy and safe foods at work. Employers may provide healthy food for free, with a subsidy, or at full cost to the employee. These programmes change the food environment through healthier canteen meals (some include promotion alongside options), snack offerings, vending machine options, more balanced portion sizes. All of these shape people‚s access to nutritious foods and encourage healthier choices.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Employee_Healthy_Food_Programme_Progress+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137063,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supply Chain Workforce Nutrition Programme Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Workforce_Nutrition_Programme_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supply Chain Workforce Nutrition Programme Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report on its workforce nutrition programmes for workers in its supply chains?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Approximately 58% of the world’s population spends a third of their time at work during<br>\ntheir adult life (CGF, n.d.). Companies can promote nutrition at work through a set of interventions,<br>\nincluding access to and supply of healthy foods and breastfeeding support (Workforce Nutrition<br>\nAlliance, 2022). Moreover, they can make their workforce nutrition programmes even more impactful<br>\nby targeting their supply chain workers in low- and middle-income countries, where rates of<br>\nmalnutrition are higher (ATNI, 2021).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe beneficiaries of the project/program(s) must not be directly employed by the company, but must be part of the company‚s supply chain. For example, farmers (and families) in low- or middle-income countries.<br>\nThe project/program(s) must include an explicit focus on nutrition, involving at least one element of enabling availability, access, and/or affordability of nutritious foods, or breastfeeding support.<br>\nTypes of foods include: fruit and vegetables, fortified grains or oils, proteins, micronutrient supplements<br>\nExamples:<br>\nAccess to healthy foods: kitchen gardens, access to seeds/vines, animal husbandry. Food should be available at a subsidized cost or for free.<br>\nBreastfeeding support: knowledge sharing, space allocated to breastfeed<br>\n<br>\n <br>\nDEFINITIONS<br>\nGAIN Workforce nutrition scorecard<br>\nBreastfeeding support programmes<br>\nWorkplace breastfeeding support includes programmes or company policies which enable working mothers to breastfeed. Such programmes can include: respecting or exceeding national laws on duration of paid maternity leave; providing an appropriate place and time to express/pump milk during work hours and providing options for working mothers such as on-site child care and flexible work schedules. Some programmes include awareness-raising or nutrition education campaigns for mothers and coworkers on the importance of breastfeeding.<br>\nHealthy foods at work<br>\nThese are programmes which focus on increasing employees‚ access to healthy and safe foods at work. Employers may provide healthy food for free, with a subsidy, or at full cost to the employee. These programmes change the food environment through healthier canteen meals (some include promotion alongside options), snack offerings, vending machine options, more balanced portion sizes. All of these shape people‚s access to nutritious foods and encourage healthier choices.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Workforce_Nutrition_Programme_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137079,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+GFSI Certification Coverage Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+GFSI_Certification_Coverage_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "GFSI Certification Coverage Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the percentage of its own operations that are certified under a Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI)-recognised food safety scheme/certification programme or other widely recognised (industry-specific) certification?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Every year, an estimated 600 million people – almost 10% of the global population – fall ill<br>\nafter eating contaminated food, out of which about 420,000 die (WHO, 2022). Unsafe food creates a<br>\nvicious cycle of disease and malnutrition, and particularly affects infants, young children, the elderly<br>\nand the sick. It also disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries (GAIN, 2024).<br>\nCompanies have a crucial responsibility to ensure that they meet all the expected standards to ensure<br>\nfood safety.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nCertifications must be GFSI-recognized or widely accepted industry-specific standards.<br>\nAcceptable disclosures may include specific percentages (e.g., 95% of our facilities are certified‚) or the exact number of certified facilities relative to the total number.<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is not applicable to agricultural inputs companies.<br>\nList of GFSI-recognised certifications<br>\nBRCGS, CanadaGAP, EFI, Freshcare, FSSC 2200, GRMS, GRMA, Global Seafood Alliance, GlobalG.A.P., IFS, JapanFood Safety Management, Association, ASIA GAP, PrimusGFS, SQF<br>\nList by sector here",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+GFSI_Certification_Coverage_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137090,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+GFSI 100% Certification Achievement Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+GFSI_100_Certification_Achievement_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "GFSI 100% Certification Achievement Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose whether it has achieved Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI)-recognised food safety certification for 100% of its own operations?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Every year, an estimated 600 million people – almost 10% of the global population – fall ill<br>\nafter eating contaminated food, out of which about 420,000 die (WHO, 2022). Unsafe food creates a<br>\nvicious cycle of disease and malnutrition, and particularly affects infants, young children, the elderly<br>\nand the sick. It also disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries (GAIN, 2024).<br>\nCompanies have a crucial responsibility to ensure that they meet all the expected standards to ensure<br>\nfood safety.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nStatements such as \"all operations are certified\" or \"100% of our facilities are GFSI-certified\" are acceptable.<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is not applicable to agricultural inputs companies.<br>\nList of GFSI-recognised certifications<br>\nBRCGS, CanadaGAP, EFI, Freshcare, FSSC 2200, GRMS, GRMA, Global Seafood Alliance, GlobalG.A.P., IFS, JapanFood Safety Management, Association, ASIA GAP, PrimusGFS, SQF<br>\nList by sector here",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+GFSI_100_Certification_Achievement_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137106,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Food Supplier Food Safety Certification Support",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Food_Supplier_Food_Safety_Certification_Support.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Food Supplier Food Safety Certification Support",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how it supports food suppliers and other value chain partners to work towards a food safety certification/programme?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Every year, an estimated 600 million people – almost 10% of the global population – fall ill<br>\nafter eating contaminated food, out of which about 420,000 die (WHO, 2022). Unsafe food creates a<br>\nvicious cycle of disease and malnutrition, and particularly affects infants, young children, the elderly<br>\nand the sick. It also disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries (GAIN, 2024).<br>\nCompanies have a crucial responsibility to ensure that they meet all the expected standards to ensure<br>\nfood safety.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company describes how it is supporting its suppliers in achieving certifications and adhering to food safety standards, especially in middle and low-income countries.<br>\n\tThe company must clearly describe specific actions or programs through which it supports its suppliers. <br>\nAcceptable forms of support include, but are not limited to:<br>\n\tFinancial assistance: Providing direct funding, cost-sharing, or subsidies to help suppliers cover the costs associated with obtaining certifications.<br>\n\tCapacity-building and training: Offering targeted educational workshops, technical assistance, or dedicated training programs to suppliers focused explicitly on food safety standards and certifications.<br>\n\tResource provision: Providing guidance documents, certification toolkits, technical resources, equipment, or dedicated staff support to help suppliers achieve certification.<br>\n\tIt is insufficient for the company to only state that it audits or evaluates supplier compliance. The company must actively engage and invest in enhancing suppliers' capabilities and standards.<br>\n\tSpecific mention or examples of support in low- and middle-income countries and/or SMEs<br>\n\tCompanies should disclose evidence through clearly defined programs or specific examples of support provided to suppliers, not merely general statements of expectation or requirements.<br>\n<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is not applicable to agricultural inputs companies.<br>\nList of GFSI-recognised certifications<br>\nBRCGS, CanadaGAP, EFI, Freshcare, FSSC 2200, GRMS, GRMA, Global Seafood Alliance, GlobalG.A.P., IFS, JapanFood Safety Management, Association, ASIA GAP, PrimusGFS, SQF<br>\nList by sector here",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Food_Supplier_Food_Safety_Certification_Support+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137122,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Food Supplier GFSI Certification Coverage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Food_Supplier_GFSI_Certification_Coverage.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Food Supplier GFSI Certification Coverage",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the percentage of food suppliers in its value chain certified under a GFSI-recognised food safety scheme/certification programme?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Every year, an estimated 600 million people – almost 10% of the global population – fall ill<br>\nafter eating contaminated food, out of which about 420,000 die (WHO, 2022). Unsafe food creates a<br>\nvicious cycle of disease and malnutrition, and particularly affects infants, young children, the elderly<br>\nand the sick. It also disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries (GAIN, 2024).<br>\nCompanies have a crucial responsibility to ensure that they meet all the expected standards to ensure<br>\nfood safety.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nAcceptable disclosures include explicit percentages (e.g., \"85% of our suppliers are GFSI-certified\")<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is not applicable to agricultural inputs companies.<br>\nList of GFSI-recognised certifications<br>\nBRCGS, CanadaGAP, EFI, Freshcare, FSSC 2200, GRMS, GRMA, Global Seafood Alliance, GlobalG.A.P., IFS, JapanFood Safety Management, Association, ASIA GAP, PrimusGFS, SQF<br>\nList by sector here",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Food_Supplier_GFSI_Certification_Coverage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137138,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Antibiotic Phase-Out Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Antibiotic_Phase_Out_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Antibiotic Phase-Out Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company have a time-bound commitment to phase out the use of antibiotics both for prophylactic purposes and as growth promoters across its geographies?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "More than 70 billion land animals are farmed for food annually, with two-thirds in<br>\nconditions that prevent them from moving freely or living naturally. Approximately 600 million pigs,<br>\nfor instance, are estimated to live in intensive and confined conditions that deny their natural instincts<br>\nto forage and to nest (World Animal Protection, 2021).<br>\nSuch intensive farming practices serve as optimal breeding grounds for viral pathogens, leading to the<br>\nrise of infectious diseases. Over half of all infectious diseases transferred from animals to humans<br>\nsince 1940 have stemmed from intensive livestock production systems (UNEP and ILRI, 2020).<br>\nMoreover, the use of antibiotics in livestock and aquaculture production leads to antimicrobial<br>\nresistance and is a significant public health threat (FAO, n.d.). Companies must respond to the call of<br>\ngovernments and stakeholders around the world to ensure the welfare of their farmed animals and<br>\neliminate antibiotics use in their farming practices.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe commitment must:<br>\n\tInclude a timebound target<br>\n\tCover all species if the company sources 1 or 2 species<br>\n\tCover at least three species if the company sources multiple animal products.<br>\n\tBe short-term (now-2030)<br>\n\tBe global or cover at least two geographical regions (especially if the company operates in EU, where regulations already strictly limit the prophylactic use and ban the use of antibiotics as growth promoters in animal feed).<br>\nIf the company already states zero use of antibiotics for both purposes across all geographies, they meet this element.<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable only to companies with animal proteins as a part of their operations or supply chain.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Antibiotic_Phase_Out_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137154,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Animal Welfare Target Setting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Animal_Welfare_Target_Setting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Animal Welfare Target Setting",
      "question": "Does the company set targets to address animal welfare issues?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "More than 70 billion land animals are farmed for food annually, with two-thirds in<br>\nconditions that prevent them from moving freely or living naturally. Approximately 600 million pigs,<br>\nfor instance, are estimated to live in intensive and confined conditions that deny their natural instincts<br>\nto forage and to nest (World Animal Protection, 2021).<br>\nSuch intensive farming practices serve as optimal breeding grounds for viral pathogens, leading to the<br>\nrise of infectious diseases. Over half of all infectious diseases transferred from animals to humans<br>\nsince 1940 have stemmed from intensive livestock production systems (UNEP and ILRI, 2020).<br>\nMoreover, the use of antibiotics in livestock and aquaculture production leads to antimicrobial<br>\nresistance and is a significant public health threat (FAO, n.d.). Companies must respond to the call of<br>\ngovernments and stakeholders around the world to ensure the welfare of their farmed animals and<br>\neliminate antibiotics use in their farming practices.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nTarget content: <br>\nTargets must be related to the following key welfare issues (see table below for a specific list per species): <br>\noEnding (100%) mutilation practices<br>\noCompletely (100%) phasing out confinement or overcrowding during housing and/or transport<br>\noEnsuring 100% humane slaughter (e.g. 100% of animals subject to pre-slaughter stunning). <br>\nTargets to partially reduce the incidence of mutilation or overcrowding/confinement, or partially improve slaughter methods, are not accepted.<br>\n<br>\nNumber of targets: <br>\nIf the company only sources 1 species, they must have targets or achievements that cover at least TWO key welfare issues for that species.<br>\nIf the company sources 2 species, they must have at least one key welfare issue target or achievement per species. <br>\nIf the company sources 3 or more species, they must have key welfare issue targets or achievements related to at least three species. <br>\nIf chickens and/or pigs are sourced, these must have associated key welfare issue targets. <br>\nComplete achievements of key welfare issues (e.g. 100% cage-free hens) across all geographies sourcing that species count. <br>\n<br>\nAdditional requirements: <br>\nTargets do not require a baseline value or year<br>\nTargets must be short-term (i.e. with target years within 5 years of the reporting year).<br>\n For food retailers, targets must cover the company‚s own-branded products at a minimum. <br>\n<br>\n<br>\n\\* See FARMS stocking densities per species:  . <br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable only to companies with animal proteins as a part of their operations or supply chain.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Animal_Welfare_Target_Setting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137170,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Animal Welfare Progress Reporting",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Animal_Welfare_Progress_Reporting.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Animal Welfare Progress Reporting",
      "question": "Does the company report progress on animal welfare?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "More than 70 billion land animals are farmed for food annually, with two-thirds in<br>\nconditions that prevent them from moving freely or living naturally. Approximately 600 million pigs,<br>\nfor instance, are estimated to live in intensive and confined conditions that deny their natural instincts<br>\nto forage and to nest (World Animal Protection, 2021).<br>\nSuch intensive farming practices serve as optimal breeding grounds for viral pathogens, leading to the<br>\nrise of infectious diseases. Over half of all infectious diseases transferred from animals to humans<br>\nsince 1940 have stemmed from intensive livestock production systems (UNEP and ILRI, 2020).<br>\nMoreover, the use of antibiotics in livestock and aquaculture production leads to antimicrobial<br>\nresistance and is a significant public health threat (FAO, n.d.). Companies must respond to the call of<br>\ngovernments and stakeholders around the world to ensure the welfare of their farmed animals and<br>\neliminate antibiotics use in their farming practices.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\n\tThe company must report continuous quantitative improvements in all key animal welfare parameters (i.e. metrics related to mutilation, overcrowding/confinement, and humane slaughter) it reports on, across the previous three reporting years.<br>\n\tThe company does not need targets (i.e. they do not need to meet element B) to meet this element.<br>\n\tQuantitative improvements could include, for example, continuous (i.e. 3 yearly) increases in the percentage of chickens housed in cage-free systems or continuous (i.e. 3 yearly) reductions in pigs subjected to teeth clipping. Disclosure of certifications or third-party audits are not accepted as progress.<br>\n\tIf the company reports data on multiple key welfare issues, but are only improving in one, they will meet this element as long as they are NOT regressing in any others. If they regress in any one of the key welfare issues they report on, it is an unmet.<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable only to companies with animal proteins as a part of their operations or supply chain.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Animal_Welfare_Progress_Reporting+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137191,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Animal Welfare Target Geographic Coverage",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Animal_Welfare_Target_Geographic_Coverage.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Animal Welfare Target Geographic Coverage",
      "question": "Are the company's animal welfare targets applicable to all geographies?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "More than 70 billion land animals are farmed for food annually, with two-thirds in<br>\nconditions that prevent them from moving freely or living naturally. Approximately 600 million pigs,<br>\nfor instance, are estimated to live in intensive and confined conditions that deny their natural instincts<br>\nto forage and to nest (World Animal Protection, 2021).<br>\nSuch intensive farming practices serve as optimal breeding grounds for viral pathogens, leading to the<br>\nrise of infectious diseases. Over half of all infectious diseases transferred from animals to humans<br>\nsince 1940 have stemmed from intensive livestock production systems (UNEP and ILRI, 2020).<br>\nMoreover, the use of antibiotics in livestock and aquaculture production leads to antimicrobial<br>\nresistance and is a significant public health threat (FAO, n.d.). Companies must respond to the call of<br>\ngovernments and stakeholders around the world to ensure the welfare of their farmed animals and<br>\neliminate antibiotics use in their farming practices.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company provides evidence of implementing all of its animal welfare targets in all operational regions, including developing countries. This could include an explicit statement or policy that the company‚s welfare targets apply to all geographies.<br>\n <br>\nThis indicator is applicable only to companies with animal proteins as a part of their operations or supply chain.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Animal_Welfare_Target_Geographic_Coverage+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137207,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Child Labour Age Verification in Own Operations",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Child_Labour_Age_Verification_in_Own_Operations.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Child Labour Age Verification in Own Operations",
      "question": "Does the company disclose whether it verifies the age of workers recruited in its own operations to ensure that they are not engaged in child labour?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Worldwide, 70% of child labour occurs in agriculture, affecting 112 million children, with<br>\nthree-quarters being under the age of 11. A significant 72% of this takes place on small-scale family<br>\nfarms, and half of all children in child labour engage in hazardous work posing severe risks to their<br>\nsafety and development (ILO and UNICEF, 2021). Child labour not only deprives children of their rights<br>\nto education and development but also perpetuates cycles of poverty, limiting future societal growth<br>\nand sustainable development. Companies, particularly those operating in global supply chains, bear<br>\nthe responsibility to ensure that their operations do not contribute to or benefit from child labour.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must ensure it verifies the age of workers in its own operations to prevent child labour.<br>\n<br>\nAge verification<br>\n\tThe company must have a formal system to verify the age of all workers before recruitment. This could include checking identification documents and cross-referencing these records with educational and employment histories.<br>\n\tIf the company is part of a third-party auditing scheme, such as SMETA (Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit), they must ensure auditors record the process by which age is checked at recruitment and how these records are maintained.<br>\nScope: It must ensure this verification is applied universally across all its operations and geographies.<br>\n<br>\nIt is not sufficient if the company simply mentions that they comply with local child labour laws without demonstrating a clear process for age verification.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Child_Labour_Age_Verification_in_Own_Operations+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137223,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Child Labour Remediation Programme Participation",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Child_Labour_Remediation_Programme_Participation.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Child Labour Remediation Programme Participation",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it develops, participates in or contributes to child labour remediation programmes?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Worldwide, 70% of child labour occurs in agriculture, affecting 112 million children, with<br>\nthree-quarters being under the age of 11. A significant 72% of this takes place on small-scale family<br>\nfarms, and half of all children in child labour engage in hazardous work posing severe risks to their<br>\nsafety and development (ILO and UNICEF, 2021). Child labour not only deprives children of their rights<br>\nto education and development but also perpetuates cycles of poverty, limiting future societal growth<br>\nand sustainable development. Companies, particularly those operating in global supply chains, bear<br>\nthe responsibility to ensure that their operations do not contribute to or benefit from child labour.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must describe how it develops, participates in or contributes to child labour remediation programmes for transition from employment to education, enabling children to attend and remain in education, if and when child labour is found in its operations and how it improves working conditions for young workers where relevant.<br>\n<br>\nThe company should describe at least one of the following actions:<br>\n\tTransition from Employment to Education: The company describes how it ensures that, when child labour is found, children are transitioned from employment into education programs.<br>\n\tEnabling Children to Attend and Remain in Education: The company must demonstrate efforts to enable children to attend and remain in education, providing long-term support to ensure children do not return to work.<br>\n\tImproving Working Conditions for Young Workers: If the company employs young workers, it must show how it improves working conditions for them, ensuring that they are not engaged in hazardous work and are protected in line with international standards.<br>\n\tHaving remediation programmes in compliance with: [Child Labour Monitoring and Remediation Systems ](https://www.cocoainitiative.org/our-work/operational-support/child-labour-monitoring-and-remediation-systems)(CLMRS) <strong>OR</strong> Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit ([SMETA](https://www.sedex.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/SMETA-6.1-Measurement-Criteria.pdf)) (pg. 37-40)",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Child_Labour_Remediation_Programme_Participation+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137239,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Business Relationship Child Labour Age Verification Requirement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Business_Relationship_Child_Labour_Age_Verification_Requirement.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Business Relationship Child Labour Age Verification Requirement",
      "question": "Does the company require business relationships in its contractual arrangements or code of conduct to verify the age of workers they recruit?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Worldwide, 70% of child labour occurs in agriculture, affecting 112 million children, with<br>\nthree-quarters being under the age of 11. A significant 72% of this takes place on small-scale family<br>\nfarms, and half of all children in child labour engage in hazardous work posing severe risks to their<br>\nsafety and development (ILO and UNICEF, 2021). Child labour not only deprives children of their rights<br>\nto education and development but also perpetuates cycles of poverty, limiting future societal growth<br>\nand sustainable development. Companies, particularly those operating in global supply chains, bear<br>\nthe responsibility to ensure that their operations do not contribute to or benefit from child labour.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nContractual arrangements:<br>\nThe company must disclose evidence that it has formal, binding contractual arrangements with suppliers that mandate the verification of workers' ages, such as a Supplier Code of Conduct or an equivalent contract.<br>\n<br>\nAge Verification Process:<br>\n\tThe company requires suppliers to verify the age of workers through government-issued documents (such as passports, national IDs, birth certificates).<br>\n\tThe company can also meet the indicator by demonstrating that its suppliers comply with child labour requirements under third-party standards such as SMETA or Amfori BSCI. The company must clearly indicate that these third-party audits cover 100% of the suppliers and include the age verification requirement.<br>\n<br>\nIt is not sufficient if the company relies on non-binding supplier guidelines or recommendations. Binding contractual obligations are required or if the disclosure does not explicitly mention age verification or how it is enforced.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Business_Relationship_Child_Labour_Age_Verification_Requirement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137260,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Business Relationship Child Labour Elimination Efforts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Business_Relationship_Child_Labour_Elimination_Efforts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Business Relationship Child Labour Elimination Efforts",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it works with its business relationships to eliminate child labour and to improve working conditions for young workers where relevant?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Worldwide, 70% of child labour occurs in agriculture, affecting 112 million children, with<br>\nthree-quarters being under the age of 11. A significant 72% of this takes place on small-scale family<br>\nfarms, and half of all children in child labour engage in hazardous work posing severe risks to their<br>\nsafety and development (ILO and UNICEF, 2021). Child labour not only deprives children of their rights<br>\nto education and development but also perpetuates cycles of poverty, limiting future societal growth<br>\nand sustainable development. Companies, particularly those operating in global supply chains, bear<br>\nthe responsibility to ensure that their operations do not contribute to or benefit from child labour.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company should indicate how it is building the capacity of the supplier to prevent child labour impacts. The disclosure should include specific examples and actions that indicate meaningful engagement with suppliers. This goes beyond simple monitoring or supplier codes and must demonstrate proactive measures taken by the company.<br>\n<br>\nExamples could include (non-exhaustive list):<br>\n\tWorker training, human resource training or awareness raising programs on child labour issues<br>\n\tPre-qualification process of private recruitment and employment agencies, and formalisation of worker contracts<br>\n\tJoint project with partners to address the root causes of child labour, for example through improving access to education, and helping farmers to increase their incomes<br>\n\tPartner with suppliers or expert organisations to provide remediation measures when child labour risk is identified in its supply chain",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Business_Relationship_Child_Labour_Elimination_Efforts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137276,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Child Labour Supply Chain Progress",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Child_Labour_Supply_Chain_Progress.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Child Labour Supply Chain Progress",
      "question": "Does the company demonstrate progress towards eliminating child labour in its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Worldwide, 70% of child labour occurs in agriculture, affecting 112 million children, with<br>\nthree-quarters being under the age of 11. A significant 72% of this takes place on small-scale family<br>\nfarms, and half of all children in child labour engage in hazardous work posing severe risks to their<br>\nsafety and development (ILO and UNICEF, 2021). Child labour not only deprives children of their rights<br>\nto education and development but also perpetuates cycles of poverty, limiting future societal growth<br>\nand sustainable development. Companies, particularly those operating in global supply chains, bear<br>\nthe responsibility to ensure that their operations do not contribute to or benefit from child labour.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must provide quantitative data on child labour in its supply chain and show a trend of improvement over time. The data should be clear, comparable, and demonstrate progress toward eliminating child labour.<br>\n<br>\n**Quantitative Data**<br>\nTypes of quantitative data could include:<br>\n\tPercentage of supplier audits where child labour issues were detected<br>\n\tPercentage of suppliers audited in compliance with child labour provisions<br>\n\tNumber of incidents related to child labour<br>\n**Progress**<br>\nTo fully meet the element, the data disclosed must be comparable across at least two reporting periods and demonstrate progress. This could include:<br>\n\tShowing a reduction in the number or percentage of incidents where child labour is detected.<br>\n\tDemonstrating an increase in the percentage of suppliers that are in compliance with child labour standards.<br>\n\tTracking improvements over multiple years to clearly show how the company‚s efforts are making an impact.<br>\n<br>\nIt is not sufficient if:<br>\n\tThe company only provides data for a single point in time without showing comparisons or trends.<br>\n\tThe data is not connected to a clear analysis of progress or does not indicate measurable improvement in child labour issues",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Child_Labour_Supply_Chain_Progress+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137292,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Employer Pays Principle and Worker Freedom Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Employer_Pays_Principle_and_Worker_Freedom_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Employer Pays Principle and Worker Freedom Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose that jobseekers and workers do not pay any recruitment fees or related costs to secure a job (Employer Pays Principle), that it does not restrict workers' freedom and that it pays workers in full and on time?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A recent estimate shows 27.6 million people are currently in situations of forced labour and<br>\nthe agriculture sector accounts for 12% of adult forced labour (ILO, Walk Free and IOM, 2022).<br>\nWorkers face various forms of coercion, the most common being wage withholding. Migrant workers<br>\nare particularly vulnerable, being three times more at risk due to unfair recruitment practices and the<br>\ninability to exercise their rights, among other factors (ILO, Walk Free, and IOM, 2022). Meeting the<br>\nSDG targets to end forced labour among children by 2025 and universally by 2030 requires faster<br>\nprogress. With nearly two-thirds of forced labour occurring in the private economy, companies must<br>\nstep up efforts to eliminate it within their operations and supply chains.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must disclose all of the following 3 requirements:<br>\n<br>\n1\\. Workers do not pay any recruitment fees or related costs to secure a job. To meet this requirement, the company must disclose one of the following:<br>\n        Companies indicating to prohibit ANY of the following:<br>\n-Recruitment fees<br>\n-Fees (in exchange) for employment<br>\n-Employment-related fees<br>\n-Bonded labour<br>\n-Indentured labour<br>\n        Companies disclose they are aligned with / follow the RBA Code of Conduct<br>\n<br>\n2\\. The company does not restrict workers' freedom. To meet this requirement, the company must disclose/state (or similar) one of the following:<br>\n        to not retain workers' personal document<br>\nCompanies meet this requirement by stating (or similar); do not retain / hold / withhold / confiscate / workers are not required to hand over / not required to deposit  identity documents / personal documents / immigration documents / government-issued identification<br>\n        to not restrict workers' freedom of movement.<br>\nCompanies meet this requirement by stating (or similar); no unreasonable restrictions / excessive facility entrance and exit restrictions shall not be imposed / employees are free to leave work at any time or terminate their employment / do not restrict freedom of movement<br>\n        to not require workers to use company provided accommodation<br>\nCompanies meet this requirement by stating (or similar); do not require workers to stay at and pay for company accommodations.<br>\n        Companies disclose they are aligned with / follow the RBA Code of Conduct<br>\n<br>\n3\\. Workers are paid regularly, in full and on time<br>\n        _regularly_‚<br>\nCompanies can be assumed to pay regularly if they give indicate paying workers at a consistent frequency. This can be a specified frequency (i.e. daily, weekly, monthly) but this is not necessary. Generally stating workers are paid regularly‚ on on fixed pay days‚ is sufficient.<br>\n        _in full_‚<br>\nCompanies can be assumed to pay in full if they state (or similar): in full / accurate payment amounts / no improper deductions / deductions are prohibited.<br>\n        _on time_‚<br>\nCompanies can be assumed to pay on time if they state (or similar); on time / timely payment / by the pay date / paid in a timely manner.<br>\nNote: reference to both in full and on time (or similar wording) is required. If the company does not mention the frequency (regular), the requirement is met.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Employer_Pays_Principle_and_Worker_Freedom_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137308,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Business Relationship Forced Labour and Recruitment Fee Prohibition",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Business_Relationship_Forced_Labour_and_Recruitment_Fee_Prohibition.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Business Relationship Forced Labour and Recruitment Fee Prohibition",
      "question": "Does the company prohibit business relationships in its contractual arrangements or code of conduct from charging recruitment fees and restricting workers' freedom, and require they pay their workers in full and on time?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A recent estimate shows 27.6 million people are currently in situations of forced labour and<br>\nthe agriculture sector accounts for 12% of adult forced labour (ILO, Walk Free and IOM, 2022).<br>\nWorkers face various forms of coercion, the most common being wage withholding. Migrant workers<br>\nare particularly vulnerable, being three times more at risk due to unfair recruitment practices and the<br>\ninability to exercise their rights, among other factors (ILO, Walk Free, and IOM, 2022). Meeting the<br>\nSDG targets to end forced labour among children by 2025 and universally by 2030 requires faster<br>\nprogress. With nearly two-thirds of forced labour occurring in the private economy, companies must<br>\nstep up efforts to eliminate it within their operations and supply chains.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must include requirements related to the prohibition and prevention of forced labour in contracts with suppliers. All disclosure must be found in a contractual document for suppliers, such as a Supplier Code of Conduct.<br>\n<br>\nTo fulfil the element the company must disclose the following three requirements:<br>\n<br>\n1\\. Prohibit suppliers from charging recruitment fees<br>\nCompanies indicating to prohibit suppliers (including through their recruitment partners, if any) from any of the following fulfill this requirement:<br>\n\tRecruitment fees<br>\n\tFees (in exchange) for employment<br>\n\tEmployment-related fees<br>\n\tBonded labour<br>\n\tIndentured labour<br>\n<br>\n2\\. Prohibit suppliers from restricting workers‚ freedom<br>\nTo fulfil this element, a company must require at least one of the following from its suppliers:<br>\n\t _to not retain workers‚ personal document_<br>\nCompanies meet this requirement by stating (or similar); do not retain / hold / withhold / confiscate / workers are not required to hand over / not required to deposit  identity documents / personal documents / immigration documents / government-issued identification<br>\n\t_to not restrict workers‚ freedom of movement_<br>\nCompanies meet this requirement by stating (or similar); no unreasonable restrictions / excessive facility entrance and exit restrictions shall not be imposed / employees are free to leave work at any time or terminate their employment / do not restrict freedom of movement<br>\n\t_to not require workers to use company provided accommodation_<br>\nCompanies meet this requirement by stating (or similar); do not require workers to stay at and pay for company accommodations.<br>\n<br>\n3\\. Require suppliers to pay workers regularly, in full and on time<br>\n\t_regularly_‚<br>\nCompanies can be assumed to pay regularly if they give indicate paying workers at a consistent frequency. This can be a specified frequency (i.e. daily, weekly, monthly) but this is not necessary. Generally stating workers are paid regularly‚ on on fixed pay days‚ is sufficient.<br>\n\t_in full_‚<br>\nCompanies can be assumed to pay in full if they state (or similar): in full / accurate payment amounts / no improper deductions / deductions are prohibited<br>\n\t_on time_‚<br>\nCompanies can be assumed to pay on time if they state (or similar); on time / timely payment / by the pay date / paid in a timely manner<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> reference to both in full and on time (or similar wording) is required. If the company does not mention the frequency (regular), the requirement can still be awarded.</em><br>\n<br>\nExamples that are not sufficient:<br>\n\tStating that workers are paid in line with local legislation.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Business_Relationship_Forced_Labour_and_Recruitment_Fee_Prohibition+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137324,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Business Relationship Forced Labour Elimination Efforts",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Business_Relationship_Forced_Labour_Elimination_Efforts.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Business Relationship Forced Labour Elimination Efforts",
      "question": "Does the company describe how it works with its business relationships to eliminate forced labour?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A recent estimate shows 27.6 million people are currently in situations of forced labour and<br>\nthe agriculture sector accounts for 12% of adult forced labour (ILO, Walk Free and IOM, 2022).<br>\nWorkers face various forms of coercion, the most common being wage withholding. Migrant workers<br>\nare particularly vulnerable, being three times more at risk due to unfair recruitment practices and the<br>\ninability to exercise their rights, among other factors (ILO, Walk Free, and IOM, 2022). Meeting the<br>\nSDG targets to end forced labour among children by 2025 and universally by 2030 requires faster<br>\nprogress. With nearly two-thirds of forced labour occurring in the private economy, companies must<br>\nstep up efforts to eliminate it within their operations and supply chains.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must disclose activities to combat forced labour in their supply chain. It must disclose at least one activity related to 1) recruitment fees; 2) restricting workers‚ freedom; or 3) paying workers in full and on time. An example in specific locations/commodities is accepted to get a met.<br>\n<br>\nActions may include at least one of the following (non-exhaustive list):<br>\n\ttrainings or capacity building to suppliers on recruitment fees / workers‚ freedom / wage practices<br>\n\tconducting root cause analysis on forced labour in its supply chain<br>\n\tprovision of tools for suppliers to carry out audit of their recruitment partners\\*<br>\n\tconducting root cause analysis on forced labour at suppliers<br>\n<br>\nExamples that would NOT be met on their own:<br>\n\tMonitoring or auditing suppliers for forced labour<br>\n<br>\n\\* Recruitment partners may include employment agencies / labour brokers / recruitment intermediaries / labour agents / recruitment providers.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Business_Relationship_Forced_Labour_Elimination_Efforts+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137340,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Forced Labour Supply Chain Progress",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Forced_Labour_Supply_Chain_Progress.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Forced Labour Supply Chain Progress",
      "question": "Does the company demonstrate progress towards eliminating forced labour in its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "A recent estimate shows 27.6 million people are currently in situations of forced labour and<br>\nthe agriculture sector accounts for 12% of adult forced labour (ILO, Walk Free and IOM, 2022).<br>\nWorkers face various forms of coercion, the most common being wage withholding. Migrant workers<br>\nare particularly vulnerable, being three times more at risk due to unfair recruitment practices and the<br>\ninability to exercise their rights, among other factors (ILO, Walk Free, and IOM, 2022). Meeting the<br>\nSDG targets to end forced labour among children by 2025 and universally by 2030 requires faster<br>\nprogress. With nearly two-thirds of forced labour occurring in the private economy, companies must<br>\nstep up efforts to eliminate it within their operations and supply chains.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must provide quantitative data on how it has improved over the years on decreasing the incidence of forced labour in its supply chain.<br>\n<br>\nThe company thus needs to fulfil two requirements:<br>\n**Quantitative data**<br>\nTo fulfil this requirement, companies need to disclose quantitative data on forced labour in general, or one of the manifestations of forced labour (recruitment fees, illicit wage practices, restrictions on workers). Examples are (non-exhaustive):<br>\n\t% of supplier audits where forced labour issues were detected<br>\n\t% of suppliers audited that are in compliance with forced labour provisions<br>\n\tNumber of incidents related to forced labour<br>\n**Progress**<br>\nTo fully meet the element, the data disclosed must be comparable across at least two reporting periods and demonstrate progress. This could include:<br>\n\tShowing a reduction in the number or percentage of incidents where forced labour is detected.<br>\n\tDemonstrating an increase in the percentage of suppliers that are in compliance with forced labour provisions.<br>\n\tTracking improvements over multiple years to clearly show how the company‚s efforts are making an impact.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Forced_Labour_Supply_Chain_Progress+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137356,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Living Income Gap Assessment Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_Income_Gap_Assessment_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Living Income Gap Assessment Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how it assesses living income gaps for some commodities and/or regions?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "In many parts of the world, farming households continue to struggle to make ends meet,<br>\nwith average incomes often hovering around or below the poverty line (Oxfam, 2021) and falling far<br>\nshort of the living income benchmark. Living income, which represents the cost of a decent standard<br>\nof living, is conceptually different from living wages2F2F2F<br>\n3. It represents the earnings of those who are self-<br>\nemployed and is particularly relevant to the food and agriculture sector, wherein a vast number of<br>\nsmall-scale farmers, fishers and other producers are self-employed. Companies that source products<br>\nfrom small-scale farmers, fishers and other producers have a shared responsibility to ensure these<br>\nproducers earn a fair and decent livelihood.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses the regions and/or commodities for which it has identified living income benchmarks and describes how it calculates the difference between the living income benchmark and current income of a typical farming/fishing household in a particular location. It also discloses the source of these benchmarks, for example:<br>\n\tLiving Income Community of Practice,<br>\n\tAnker Research Institute,<br>\n\tALIGN,<br>\n\tHeifer International<br>\n\tFor some regions, there are no benchmarks available, and in these cases the company can describe how it determines the benchmarks, or utilizes existing secondary data.<br>\n<br>\nExample of how a company assesses living income gaps:<br>\n\tBy collecting data on farmer/fisher and household income, and comparing it with a living income benchmark<br>\n\tUsing existing secondary income data and, when relevant, applying adjustments and compare it with a living income benchmark<br>\n<br>\n <br>\nDEFINITIONS<br>\nLiving income: The net annual income required for a household in a particular place to afford a decent standard of living for all members of that household. Elements of a decent standard of living include food, clean water, sanitary housing, education, healthcare, transportation, clothing, and other essential needs including provision for unexpected events.<br>\nHow is it different from living wage? The concept of a living wage is applicable in the context of hired workers, such as farm or factory workers, who receive a salary for their labour. Living income, on the other hand, refers to situations of self-employment and is applicable to farmers, fishers and small-scale producers.<br>\nLiving income benchmark: An estimate of the cost of a basic and decent standard of living for a household in the area. It answers the question: how much does a typical household in a particular place need to earn, from all income sources, in order to live a decent standard of living?‚<br>\nLiving income gap: The difference between the living income benchmark and current income of a typical farming/fishing household in a certain location.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_Income_Gap_Assessment_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137372,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Living Income Gap Closure Efforts in Supply Chain",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_Income_Gap_Closure_Efforts_in_Supply_Chain.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Living Income Gap Closure Efforts in Supply Chain",
      "question": "Does the company disclose how it works with food producers or suppliers to improve livelihoods and close living income gaps through responsible procurement practices or support to its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "In many parts of the world, farming households continue to struggle to make ends meet,<br>\nwith average incomes often hovering around or below the poverty line (Oxfam, 2021) and falling far<br>\nshort of the living income benchmark. Living income, which represents the cost of a decent standard<br>\nof living, is conceptually different from living wages2F2F2F<br>\n3. It represents the earnings of those who are self-<br>\nemployed and is particularly relevant to the food and agriculture sector, wherein a vast number of<br>\nsmall-scale farmers, fishers and other producers are self-employed. Companies that source products<br>\nfrom small-scale farmers, fishers and other producers have a shared responsibility to ensure these<br>\nproducers earn a fair and decent livelihood.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must disclose a living income program(s) in relation to procurement practices, pricing practices or supports to its supply chain.<br>\nA living income program is defined as a program where: 1) a baseline living income gap has been measured and challenges have been assessed, 2) a mix of interventions are used to address challenges to multiple income drivers, 3) the goal of the program is explicitly to narrow the living income gap, 4) the program is accompanied by a monitoring and learning agenda (LICOP, 2024).<br>\n<br>\n<em><strong>Note:</strong> reference to both 1) baseline living income gap measured and challenges identified and 3) the goal of the program is explicitly to narrow the living income gap (or similar wording) is required. If the company does not disclose 2) a mix of interventions and 4) monitoring and learning agenda, the requirement is met. </em><br>\n<br>\nThe company discloses at least one of the following:<br>\nA) The company demonstrates activities to improve farmer/fisher income resilience through its trading practices and supply chain relationships for some commodities and/or regions.<br>\nThis element considers how companies can positively influence the income prospects and stability of farmers and fishers through negotiating favourable terms of exchange.<br>\n<br>\nExamples of accepted disclosure (non-exhaustive list):<br>\n\tThe company demonstrates more direct and long-term trading relationships with farmers/fishers<br>\n\tThe company demonstrates how it contributes to the stability of farmers‚/fishers‚ income through contracts (contract length, price guarantees and premiums)<br>\n\tThe company demonstrates how it is sourcing more types of products from farmers/fishers<br>\n\tThe company demonstrates how it creates new products that could increase farmers‚/fishers‚ income (for example, a supermarket creates a new consumer facing dairy product from which the dairy farmer that provided the milk, also receives a percentage of all the sales).<br>\n\tThe company discloses how it pays premiums towards living income for some commodities, for example by paying the Living Income Reference Price or Living Income Differential.<br>\n<br>\nB) The company demonstrates that it works with and supports farmers and fishers in its supply chain.<br>\nThe company discloses how it works to support individual and groups of farmers/fishers and enable them to exert more influence and act strategically in their relationships with buyers.<br>\n<br>\nExamples of accepted disclosure (non-exhaustive list):<br>\n\tThe company demonstrates how it supports strengthening farmer organizations and cooperatives, for example by providing them support in professionalising their operations, business management, or access to markets<br>\n\tThe company demonstrates how it fosters the active participation and leadership of farmers and their representative organisations in the design and implementation of living income strategies <strong>OR</strong> how it makes robust farmer/fisher feedback loops and grievance mechanisms central to assessing the progress and success of living income strategies<br>\n\tThe company demonstrates how it supports income diversification and on-farm improvements, such as storage facilities, to increase farmer/fisher bargaining power and their ability to act strategically (e.g. not sell when prices are at lowest)<br>\n\tThe company demonstrates how it supports farmer/fishers‚ ability to upgrade into higher value-added activities e.g. through facilitating access to finance.<br>\n<br>\nIn case the company doesn‚t have farmers/fishers directly in its supply chain, it can demonstrate activities that create enabling environment to improve livelihoods and closing living income gaps, such as advocacy efforts, analysing and adapting purchasing practices to enable suppliers to work toward closing living income gaps.<br>\n<br>\n <br>\nDEFINITIONS<br>\nLiving income: The net annual income required for a household in a particular place to afford a decent standard of living for all members of that household. Elements of a decent standard of living include food, clean water, sanitary housing, education, healthcare, transportation, clothing, and other essential needs including provision for unexpected events.<br>\nHow is it different from living wage? The concept of a living wage is applicable in the context of hired workers, such as farm or factory workers, who receive a salary for their labour. Living income, on the other hand, refers to situations of self-employment and is applicable to farmers, fishers and small-scale producers.<br>\nLiving income benchmark: An estimate of the cost of a basic and decent standard of living for a household in the area. It answers the question: how much does a typical household in a particular place need to earn, from all income sources, in order to live a decent standard of living?‚<br>\nLiving income gap: The difference between the living income benchmark and current income of a typical farming/fishing household in a certain location.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_Income_Gap_Closure_Efforts_in_Supply_Chain+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137393,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Living Income Gap Strategy and Action Plan",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_Income_Gap_Strategy_and_Action_Plan.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Living Income Gap Strategy and Action Plan",
      "question": "Does the company have an established strategy/joint action plan(s) to work towards closing living income gaps in its supply chain with measurable and time-bound milestones?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "In many parts of the world, farming households continue to struggle to make ends meet,<br>\nwith average incomes often hovering around or below the poverty line (Oxfam, 2021) and falling far<br>\nshort of the living income benchmark. Living income, which represents the cost of a decent standard<br>\nof living, is conceptually different from living wages2F2F2F<br>\n3. It represents the earnings of those who are self-<br>\nemployed and is particularly relevant to the food and agriculture sector, wherein a vast number of<br>\nsmall-scale farmers, fishers and other producers are self-employed. Companies that source products<br>\nfrom small-scale farmers, fishers and other producers have a shared responsibility to ensure these<br>\nproducers earn a fair and decent livelihood.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nJoint action plan (JAP): A well-defined scope with a focus on output, results and achieving a pre-defined objective. It may consist of several related objectives or strive towards a single objective.\tThe JAP may directly target the achievement of living income or target factors that enable the achievement of living income (e.g., productivity, volume sold, cost per unit of production, price).<br>\n<br>\nA JAP is generally agreed on between the different parties (company, suppliers, other State or non-State entities directly linked to the company‚s operations/productions/services). <em><strong>Note:</strong> listing key partners of the strategy/action plan is sufficient.</em><br>\n<br>\nMeasurable and time-bound milestones: The JAP needs to have milestones that can be measured (i.e. quantitative) and time-bound (i.e. have a target date). This may cover only certain regions or commodities.<br>\n<br>\n <br>\nDEFINITIONS<br>\nLiving income: The net annual income required for a household in a particular place to afford a decent standard of living for all members of that household. Elements of a decent standard of living include food, clean water, sanitary housing, education, healthcare, transportation, clothing, and other essential needs including provision for unexpected events.<br>\nHow is it different from living wage? The concept of a living wage is applicable in the context of hired workers, such as farm or factory workers, who receive a salary for their labour. Living income, on the other hand, refers to situations of self-employment and is applicable to farmers, fishers and small-scale producers.<br>\nLiving income benchmark: An estimate of the cost of a basic and decent standard of living for a household in the area. It answers the question: how much does a typical household in a particular place need to earn, from all income sources, in order to live a decent standard of living?‚<br>\nLiving income gap: The difference between the living income benchmark and current income of a typical farming/fishing household in a certain location.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_Income_Gap_Strategy_and_Action_Plan+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137409,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Living Income Gap Progress Tracking",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_Income_Gap_Progress_Tracking.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Living Income Gap Progress Tracking",
      "question": "Does the company track progress towards closing living income gaps in its supply chain?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "In many parts of the world, farming households continue to struggle to make ends meet,<br>\nwith average incomes often hovering around or below the poverty line (Oxfam, 2021) and falling far<br>\nshort of the living income benchmark. Living income, which represents the cost of a decent standard<br>\nof living, is conceptually different from living wages2F2F2F<br>\n3. It represents the earnings of those who are self-<br>\nemployed and is particularly relevant to the food and agriculture sector, wherein a vast number of<br>\nsmall-scale farmers, fishers and other producers are self-employed. Companies that source products<br>\nfrom small-scale farmers, fishers and other producers have a shared responsibility to ensure these<br>\nproducers earn a fair and decent livelihood.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must provide quantitative data on how it has improved over the years on closing living income gaps in its supply chain.<br>\n<br>\nTo meet this element, the company must have a living income programme in place and thus it must meet two requirements:<br>\nQuantitative data<br>\nTo fulfil this requirement, companies need to disclose quantitative data on living income. Living income metrics can include actual net income of focus area and change in the living income gap, or other progress metrics to track changes in income drivers over time. Examples are (non-exhaustive):<br>\n\tNet household income<br>\n\tNumber/share of producers who earn a living income<br>\n\tProgress metrics related to income drivers: total volume sold; yield; production cost; volume purchased with premium; off-farm income.<br>\nProgress<br>\nTo fulfil this requirement, the quantitative data reported by the company needs be comparable and demonstrate improvement.<br>\nThe data should not be older than the last two years. <br>\n<br>\n <br>\nDEFINITIONS<br>\nLiving income: The net annual income required for a household in a particular place to afford a decent standard of living for all members of that household. Elements of a decent standard of living include food, clean water, sanitary housing, education, healthcare, transportation, clothing, and other essential needs including provision for unexpected events.<br>\nHow is it different from living wage? The concept of a living wage is applicable in the context of hired workers, such as farm or factory workers, who receive a salary for their labour. Living income, on the other hand, refers to situations of self-employment and is applicable to farmers, fishers and small-scale producers.<br>\nLiving income benchmark: An estimate of the cost of a basic and decent standard of living for a household in the area. It answers the question: how much does a typical household in a particular place need to earn, from all income sources, in order to live a decent standard of living?‚<br>\nLiving income gap: The difference between the living income benchmark and current income of a typical farming/fishing household in a certain location.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Living_Income_Gap_Progress_Tracking+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137420,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Small-Scale Producer Supply Chain Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Small_Scale_Producer_Supply_Chain_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Small-Scale Producer Supply Chain Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the total number of small-scale producers, including farmers and fishers, in its supply chain and/or in its customer base?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Small-scale producers are vital to the global food system, yet they often face significant<br>\nchallenges that threaten their livelihoods and sustainability. These challenges include climate change,<br>\nmarket volatility, limited access to resources and socio-economic inequalities. Small-scale producers<br>\nengage with companies in multiple ways. They can be part of companies’ supply chains, providing raw<br>\nmaterials or fresh products for direct consumption, or they can be key buyers of companies’ products,<br>\npurchasing inputs like feed or fertiliser. Companies efforts towards enhancing the resilience of small-<br>\nscale producers is crucial for improving the livelihoods of millions of producers worldwide, as well as<br>\nensuring stable and sustainable value chains.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must:<br>\n\tpublish disaggregated data showing how many (or what proportion) of the farmers or fishers in its supply chain it considers small-scale<br>\n disclose a clear definition of small-scale‚, for example using land area, method of farming/fishing, or use of family labour<br>\nIn the case of input companies, the company discloses what percentage of its sales are made to small-scale producers, or how many small-scale producers use or buy their products",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Small_Scale_Producer_Supply_Chain_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137436,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Small-Scale Producer Climate Resilience Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Small_Scale_Producer_Climate_Resilience_Actions.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Small-Scale Producer Climate Resilience Actions",
      "question": "Does the company take concrete actions to improve the climate resilience of small-scale producers in its supply chain and/or in its customer base?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Small-scale producers are vital to the global food system, yet they often face significant<br>\nchallenges that threaten their livelihoods and sustainability. These challenges include climate change,<br>\nmarket volatility, limited access to resources and socio-economic inequalities. Small-scale producers<br>\nengage with companies in multiple ways. They can be part of companies’ supply chains, providing raw<br>\nmaterials or fresh products for direct consumption, or they can be key buyers of companies’ products,<br>\npurchasing inputs like feed or fertiliser. Companies efforts towards enhancing the resilience of small-<br>\nscale producers is crucial for improving the livelihoods of millions of producers worldwide, as well as<br>\nensuring stable and sustainable value chains.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nBeing a participant in a multi-stakeholder initiative is not enough to meet this indicator. The company should actively improve the climate adaptability and resilience of small-scale producers through specific interventions. For example, this could include:<br>\n\tOffering access to credit and risk management tools (e.g. subsidising insurance premiums) to help them cope with changing climate conditions.<br>\n\tProviding training on sustainable farming or fishing practices, climate-resilient seed varieties, crop diversification, soil conservation, water management etc.<br>\n\tTraining could include, for example, helping small-scale producers understand and adapt to changing climate conditions by using localized weather data, predictive models, and monitoring systems to make informed decisions.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Small_Scale_Producer_Climate_Resilience_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137452,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Supply Chain Gender Equality Actions",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Gender_Equality_Actions.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Supply Chain Gender Equality Actions",
      "question": "Does the company take concrete actions to improve gender equality in its supply chains and/or its customer base?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Small-scale producers are vital to the global food system, yet they often face significant<br>\nchallenges that threaten their livelihoods and sustainability. These challenges include climate change,<br>\nmarket volatility, limited access to resources and socio-economic inequalities. Small-scale producers<br>\nengage with companies in multiple ways. They can be part of companies’ supply chains, providing raw<br>\nmaterials or fresh products for direct consumption, or they can be key buyers of companies’ products,<br>\npurchasing inputs like feed or fertiliser. Companies efforts towards enhancing the resilience of small-<br>\nscale producers is crucial for improving the livelihoods of millions of producers worldwide, as well as<br>\nensuring stable and sustainable value chains.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nBeing a participant in a multi-stakeholder initiative is not enough to meet this indicator. The company should actively support women small-scale producers through specific targeted interventions.<br>\nFor example, this could include:<br>\n\tTraining programs that focus on leadership, financial literacy, sustainable farming practices and the use of digital tools<br>\n\tMicrofinance initiatives<br>\n\tProcurement policies that prioritise women small-scale producers",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Supply_Chain_Gender_Equality_Actions+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137468,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Small-Scale Producer Initiative Outcome Tracking",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Small_Scale_Producer_Initiative_Outcome_Tracking.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Small-Scale Producer Initiative Outcome Tracking",
      "question": "Does the company track, assess or evaluate the outcomes and impact of its climate resilience, gender equality and women's empowerment initiatives targeted towards small-scale producers in its supply chains and/or its customer base?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "Small-scale producers are vital to the global food system, yet they often face significant<br>\nchallenges that threaten their livelihoods and sustainability. These challenges include climate change,<br>\nmarket volatility, limited access to resources and socio-economic inequalities. Small-scale producers<br>\nengage with companies in multiple ways. They can be part of companies’ supply chains, providing raw<br>\nmaterials or fresh products for direct consumption, or they can be key buyers of companies’ products,<br>\npurchasing inputs like feed or fertiliser. Companies efforts towards enhancing the resilience of small-<br>\nscale producers is crucial for improving the livelihoods of millions of producers worldwide, as well as<br>\nensuring stable and sustainable value chains.<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe outcomes and impact of climate adaptation initiatives could be measured through metrics such as<br>\n\tMeasuring improvements in water use efficiency<br>\n\tMeasuring the percentage of farmers adopting climate-smart agricultural practices and/or climate-smart fisheries and aquaculture practices<br>\n\tMeasuring improvements in infrastructure, such as irrigation systems and storage facilities, that support climate adaptation<br>\n<br>\nThe outcomes and impact of gender equality and women's empowerment initiatives could be measured through metrics such as<br>\n\tImprovements in their economic status<br>\n\tCollecting feedback from the women small-scale producers to adjust and improve their initiatives<br>\n<br>\nThe outcomes and impact of climate adaptation and/or gender equality and women's empowerment initiatives should be disclosed for the element to be met.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Small_Scale_Producer_Initiative_Outcome_Tracking+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137484,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Land and Natural Resource Rights Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Land_and_Natural_Resource_Rights_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Land and Natural Resource Rights Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company commit to respect rights related to the ownership and use of land and natural resources?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "When companies seek to acquire or lease land for their business activities, it can lead to<br>\nrelocation and loss of shelter or livelihoods for communities or individual households (IFC, 2012a). In<br>\ncountries where national governance and land administration are weak, local and Indigenous communities are more exposed to rights violations and displacement (WRI, 2017). Indigenous peoples<br>\nare particularly vulnerable to the adverse impacts associated with land development projects,<br>\nincluding risk of impoverishment and loss of culture, identity and natural resource-based livelihoods<br>\n(IFC, 2012b). Protecting and securing Indigenous peoples’ rights has been recognised as crucial to<br>\nadvancing conservation, restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies (WRI,<br>\n2019).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must disclose an explicit commitment to respect the ownership and use of land and natural resources and related legitimate tenure rights as set out by either:<br>\nThe [Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (VGGTs](https://www.fao.org/tenure/voluntary-guidelines/en/)), or<br>\nThe [International Finance Corporation (IFC) performance standards](https://www.ifc.org/en/insights-reports/2012/ifc-performance-standards)<br>\n<br>\nThis element goes beyond a commitment to Indigenous land rights as it is relevant for every population or community, including urban communities or communities relying on resources that are not on land (e.g. coastal and marine). It is not sufficient to follow local applicable laws around land rights, as many countries have insufficient systems in place to secure land tenure rights.<br>\n<br>\nThe commitment must:<br>\nBe a publicly available policy statement (e.g. human rights policy/standards; code of conduct). A statement in a sustainability report is insufficient. <br>\nUse sufficient commitment language. The wording used in the commitment must be unequivocally clear that the company strongly commits to respect rights related to the ownership and use of land and natural resources. Language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment. For more guidance, please refer to [The Methodology for the 2026 Social Benchmark | World Benchmarking Alliance](https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2026-social-benchmark/).<br>\nThe policy should be applied consistently across all locations regardless of law. A commitment to or compliance with local/national laws alone is not accepted. When conflicting with local/national laws, the commitment must explicitly adhere to the highest possible standard.<br>\nThe policy should cover the company‚s own operations and supply chain, or the whole value chain. If the commitment is extended directly to other business relations, the compliance must go beyond an expectation‚ or an encouragement‚",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Land_and_Natural_Resource_Rights_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137500,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Free Prior and Informed Consent Commitment",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Free_Prior_and_Informed_Consent_Commitment.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Free Prior and Informed Consent Commitment",
      "question": "Does the company commit to obtain free, prior and informed consent?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "When companies seek to acquire or lease land for their business activities, it can lead to<br>\nrelocation and loss of shelter or livelihoods for communities or individual households (IFC, 2012a). In<br>\ncountries where national governance and land administration are weak, local and Indigenous communities are more exposed to rights violations and displacement (WRI, 2017). Indigenous peoples<br>\nare particularly vulnerable to the adverse impacts associated with land development projects,<br>\nincluding risk of impoverishment and loss of culture, identity and natural resource-based livelihoods<br>\n(IFC, 2012b). Protecting and securing Indigenous peoples’ rights has been recognised as crucial to<br>\nadvancing conservation, restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies (WRI,<br>\n2019).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must disclose an explicit commitment to obtaining free, prior and informed consent, including clearly demonstrating whether FPIC was a determining factor for the way in which a project proceeds. Accepted examples include:<br>\nCommitment to obtaining (and maintaining) Free, Prior and Informed Consent (for all relevant projects)<br>\nCommitment to the [ICMM position statement on Indigenous Peoples](https://www.icmm.com/en-gb/our-principles/position-statements/indigenous-peoples), which includes a commitment to obtain agreement with affected indigenous peoples by following an FPIC process.<br>\n<br>\nThe commitment must:<br>\nBe a publicly available policy statement (e.g. human rights policy/standards; code of conduct). A statement in a sustainability report is insufficient. <br>\nUse sufficient commitment language. The wording used in the commitment must be unequivocally clear that the company strongly commits to obtain free, prior and informed consent. Language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment. For more guidance, please refer to [The Methodology for the 2026 Social Benchmark | World Benchmarking Alliance](https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2026-social-benchmark/).<br>\nThe policy should be applied consistently across all locations regardless of law. A commitment to or compliance with local/national laws alone is not accepted. When conflicting with local/national laws, the commitment must explicitly adhere to the highest possible standard.<br>\nThe policy should cover the company‚s own operations and supply chain, or the whole value chain. If the commitment is extended directly to other business relations, the compliance must go beyond an expectation‚ or an encouragement‚<br>\n<br>\nExamples of weak language leading to unmet includes:<br>\nCommitment to respect the rights of Indigenous Peoples to consultation.<br>\nRecognition of FPIC as an important process / promoting FPIC, or similar.<br>\nStatements with insufficient commitment language. E.g., seeking to apply (the principles of) FPIC / striving to obtain FPIC.<br>\nLimitations on when FPIC should and should not be obtained, i.e. where practical‚, or only mentioning specific locations.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Free_Prior_and_Informed_Consent_Commitment+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137516,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Business Relationship FPIC Requirement",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Business_Relationship_FPIC_Requirement.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Business Relationship FPIC Requirement",
      "question": "Does the company require its business relationships to obtain free, prior and informed consent?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "When companies seek to acquire or lease land for their business activities, it can lead to<br>\nrelocation and loss of shelter or livelihoods for communities or individual households (IFC, 2012a). In<br>\ncountries where national governance and land administration are weak, local and Indigenous communities are more exposed to rights violations and displacement (WRI, 2017). Indigenous peoples<br>\nare particularly vulnerable to the adverse impacts associated with land development projects,<br>\nincluding risk of impoverishment and loss of culture, identity and natural resource-based livelihoods<br>\n(IFC, 2012b). Protecting and securing Indigenous peoples’ rights has been recognised as crucial to<br>\nadvancing conservation, restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies (WRI,<br>\n2019).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must disclose an explicit commitment to expecting or requiring its business partners to obtain free, prior and informed consent, including clearly demonstrating whether FPIC was a determining factor for the way in which a project proceeds. Companies must demonstrate at least one of the following:<br>\nCommitment to obtaining (and maintaining) Free, Prior and Informed Consent (for all relevant projects)<br>\nCommitment to the [ICMM position statement on Indigenous Peoples](https://www.icmm.com/en-gb/our-principles/position-statements/indigenous-peoples), which includes a commitment to obtain agreement with affected indigenous peoples by following an FPIC process.<br>\n<br>\nThe commitment must:<br>\nBe a publicly available policy statement (e.g. human rights policy/standards; code of conduct). A statement in a sustainability report is insufficient. <br>\nUse sufficient commitment language. The wording used in the commitment must be unequivocally clear that the company requires its business relationships to obtain free, prior and informed consent for its. Language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment. For more guidance, please refer to [The Methodology for the 2026 Social Benchmark | World Benchmarking Alliance](https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2026-social-benchmark/).<br>\nThe policy should cover all company‚s business relationships comprehensively and none should be excluded. <br>\nThe policy should be applied consistently across all locations regardless of law. A commitment to or compliance with local/national laws alone is not accepted. When conflicting with local/national laws, the commitment must explicitly adhere to the highest possible standard.<br>\n<br>\nExamples of weak language leading to unmet includes:<br>\nCommitment to respect the rights of Indigenous Peoples to consultation.<br>\nRecognition of FPIC as an important process / promoting FPIC, or similar.<br>\nStatements with insufficient commitment language. E.g., seeking to apply (the principles of) FPIC / striving to obtain FPIC.<br>\nLimitations on when FPIC should and should not be obtained, i.e. where practical‚, or only mentioning specific locations.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Business_Relationship_FPIC_Requirement+Answer.json"
    },
    {
      "id": 24137532,
      "name": "World Benchmarking Alliance+Free Prior and Informed Consent Example Disclosure",
      "type": "Metric",
      "url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Free_Prior_and_Informed_Consent_Example_Disclosure.json",
      "designer": "World Benchmarking Alliance",
      "title": "Free Prior and Informed Consent Example Disclosure",
      "question": "Does the company disclose the most recent example where it has obtained free, prior and informed consent or negotiated with rightsholders?",
      "metric_type": "Researched",
      "about": "The WBA Food and Agriculture Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential food and agriculture companies on their efforts to transform global food systems, tracking how companies work towards food that is healthy and nutritious, produced sustainably within planetary boundaries, and accessible and fairly produced for all. The 2026 edition assessed 350 companies spanning the entirety of the food and agriculture value chain, from agricultural inputs and commodities through to manufacturing, retail, and food service. Companies were scored on 23 food and agriculture-specific indicators and 18 core social indicators across four measurement areas: governance, sustainable food systems, healthy food systems, and inclusive food systems. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and is designed to incentivise the most influential companies in the sector to adopt sustainable business practices across their own operations and supply chains, addressing critical issues including greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater use, nutrition, and living incomes for farmers, with human rights and social equity at its core. More information can be found [[https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/benchmark/food-and-agriculture-benchmark|here]].",
      "methodology": "When companies seek to acquire or lease land for their business activities, it can lead to<br>\nrelocation and loss of shelter or livelihoods for communities or individual households (IFC, 2012a). In<br>\ncountries where national governance and land administration are weak, local and Indigenous communities are more exposed to rights violations and displacement (WRI, 2017). Indigenous peoples<br>\nare particularly vulnerable to the adverse impacts associated with land development projects,<br>\nincluding risk of impoverishment and loss of culture, identity and natural resource-based livelihoods<br>\n(IFC, 2012b). Protecting and securing Indigenous peoples’ rights has been recognised as crucial to<br>\nadvancing conservation, restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies (WRI,<br>\n2019).<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nResearch Guidance:<br>\n<br>\n<br>\nThe company must:<br>\nProvide evidence of a situation where it negotiated with Indigenous Peoples or local communities to use their land/resources <strong>OR</strong> <br>\nDecided to not pursue a project due to impacts on IP or legitimate tenure right holders.<br>\n<br>\nEligible examples could include:<br>\nEvidence of a negotiation process.<br>\nHaving obtained free, prior and informed consent (FPIC), and not just evidence of a consultation.<br>\nEvidence of a decision to not pursue the land or resourced impacting Indigenous Peoples‚ after consultation, engagement or research (for example, because FPIC was not obtained).<br>\nAn engagement protocol to guarantee adequate compensation. <br>\nAn example of benefit sharing with IPLCs arising from using land and/or natural resources where they hold rights or interests.<br>\n<br>\nIf the company has not engaged in any land transactions in the past three years which could impact Indigenous Peoples or local communities, it should describe its approach to identifying and negotiating legitimate tenure rights holders in general. <br>\n<br>\nCompanies whose operations do not require consulting and negotiating with legitimate tenure rightsholders can meet this element by demonstrating an instance in which one of their business relationships has done any of the above.",
      "value_type": "Category",
      "value_options": [
        "Yes",
        "No",
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "report_type": "Aggregate Data Report",
      "assessment": "Steward Assessed",
      "unit": null,
      "range": null,
      "hybrid": "no",
      "topics": [],
      "topic_frameworks": [],
      "scores": [],
      "formula": "(function() {\n\n\n}).call(this);\n",
      "rubric": null,
      "variables": "",
      "answer": 0,
      "bookmarkers": 0,
      "datasets": 0,
      "companies": 0,
      "calculations": [],
      "answers_url": "https://wikirate.org/World_Benchmarking_Alliance+Free_Prior_and_Informed_Consent_Example_Disclosure+Answer.json"
    }
  ],
  "links": [],
  "ancestors": [],
  "html_url": "https://wikirate.org/Metric",
  "created_at": "2015-04-22 18:36:26 UTC",
  "updated_at": "2023-09-04 13:20:57 UTC",
  "requested_at": "2026-06-01 17:44:45 UTC",
  "license": "Wikirate.org, licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). See https://wikirate.org/Attribution_Guide."
}